The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1989-10-05 (Town Hall) Meeting Agenda• • • 0 October 5, 1989 Town ~leetin9 Re: Santa Fe Corridor • • • TOWN MEETING SINCLAIR MIDDLE SCHOOL AUDITORIUM 300 WEST CHENANGO AVENUE OCTOBER 5, 1989 7:00 P.M. Meeting co..enced at 7:10 p.M. Mayor Van Dyke welcOied citizens and explained that the intent of the Meeting was two-fold -I) to provide inforMation on possible connections with South Santa Fe to the City of Englewood, and 2) to obtain citizen input on the infonaation being presented. City Manager Fraser addressed the citizens regarding the iMportance of the Santa Fe Corridor in shaping, in part at least, the future of the City of Englewood. He stated that with the cooperation of the State Highway Depart .. nt the Santa Fe Corridor can and will be one of the .ast attractive stretches of roadway ca.ing southwest out of .. tro Denver. He noted that it was i~rtant to deter.ine what is best for the City of Englewood . Mr . Fraser assured the citizens that there were a nUMber of alternatives on the drawing board and the decision h&d not been predeter.ined . He explained the forMat for the presentations and introduced the others at the podiu. -Ragland, City Engineer; Wanu sh, Director of Ca..unity Develop.ent; Joe T.-ple, State Depart.ent of Highw~Ys and the City 's liaison; Waggoner, Director of Public Works . Director W1910Mr presented the over all project of the Santa Fe Corridor II!Prov-...ts , and briefly eJCplatned the four alternatives .tlich affect the Tufts/Uri1CNI area, ustng bl«*ft up area slides. The following data was prov ided for each of the alternat i ves : A) Nulber of buslftts ses Nulber of -.loyees Nulber of res tdetlc:es Tax revenue s (total) Sales lad use Property (schools) Property (Clty) co t of Co 0 ( s T tal c t I) To l ii!Pacted i i!Pacted ted 4 sz l $3 7,479 115 ,984 Sl8 ,079 Sl ,416 Sl .7 • 2.4 • 11 n S4 .t 11 J6 .t · 7.1 alll I . • 7. 11t I . • • • -2- C) Number of business impacted 3 Number of e.ployees 102 NuMber of residences impacted 5 Tax revenues (total) $38,784 Sales and use $23,175 Property (schools) $13,137 Property (City) $2,472 Cost of ROW $2.4 million Cost of construction $4.8 million Total cost $7. 2 mi 11 ion D) Nu.ber of business i~acted I Nu.ber of ~loyees 15 Nu.ber of residences i~acted 2 Tax revenues (total) $2,173 Sales and use $-0-Property (schools) $1,828 Property (City) $345 Cost of ROW $0 .5 •illion Cost of construction $}.} -2.1 •illion Total cost $1 .6 -2.6 •illion Mayor Van Dyke introduced the Englewood City Council Mt.btrs, Alex Habenicht, Gary Kozacek, Rita Hathaway, Willi .. Clayton, Roger Koltay , and Erica Byrne . The •et 1119 was opened for quest10fls . Sheryl East .. n, residing at South HurOfl just north of Oxford, expressed concern about the increased traffic Ofl Oxford (truck traffic has tripled) as a result of the closure of KenyOfl . She stated that truck traffic has tripled , Oxford Is not .. rked, and the hill creates • very daft91rous sttua on . Ms. Eastaan ~stloned If Oxford ._,ld bt .. rked If the 11111 would bt cu t down, and would the trucks still bt using It? I • • • -3- this year we're anticipating $1.4 million in sales tax revenue fro. that sa.e area Dave Paul, a business owner at Winden.ere just north of Belleview, stated that he relies •heavily• on the traffic count. He inquired as to the traffic count for that area with Option D. Director Waggoner, noted that they had conducted two counts there, both within the range of 2800 vehicles. With the closure they would project about 3500 vehicles, and by the year 2010 about 4900 vehicles. An unidentified citizen ca..ented upon the nu~r of businesses and homes which will be affected. He asked tf consideration had been given as to how they will be affected 20 years fro. now if Oxford beca.es four lanes? He noted it will probably reduce the value of the ha.es and perhaps eliminate others. Director Waggoner stated that there is enough right-of-way on Oxford to aake it a four lane street without taking additional right-of-way. He stated that Oxford h the only proposed access to Santa Ft, betwen Belleview and Ha.pden. He questioned whether he (the unidentified citizen) would like to see another access or tf Oxford would be sufficient? The unidentified citizen responded that he dtd not see any reason to cut off all the streets, as it will cause ~re notse and traffic congestion along Oxford. Henry Ganyon, business owner at 1340 West Radcltff, questioned whether the railroad tracks would extend across, tf they were to extend Navajo north? He noted that they use about four ra t1 roed cars a IIOflth and if the ra t1 road tracks where not extended across Navajo tt would put tl•• out of bustness. Otrector W1990ft1r, stated that there is a proposal before the PUC to close several of the spur tracks that 90 across Wtndtn.ere . Mr . GanyOft stated t spur track he ts cCNteerned about IIICMild 90 across bet Stanford aftd Radcliff, re t old Publ c Strvfct yard s. Joe T lt of the State HI aft r the tlftt aftd • • • • -4- Mr. TeMple advised that there would be another crossing at Oxford, an eight foot sidewalk which will go underneath the tracks beside the roadway on the north side of Oxford to connect to the Platte River Trail. Mayor Van Dyke expressed her support for addressing this situation in the future. Howard McGregor, speaking on behalf of the Englewood Chamber of Commerce, stated that in general the business community does not care if Tufts is closed or left open, as long as there is a north-south frontage road. Wanda Crawford, "connected" with 1 Santa Fe Business, inquired as to what additional footage would be taken along Santa Fe in the future, particularly if later on they would need to widen Santa Fe even .are? She also asked what type of "finish" they were anticipating along the Santa Fe Corridor, such as a 20 foot fence? Mr. Te.ple stated that pri•arily the frontage road and all the widening of Santa Fe will be to the east of the existing right-of-way line. He told her if she had 1 particular area she could .. et with hi• after the .. eting and go over the aerial In detail. He noted that at this ti .. noise fences where not planned, according to the reca..endatlon of the EnvironMental Assess .. nt done In 1986. An unidentified citizen requested other alternatives besides Union and Tufts . She asked why they couldn 't put so.ethlng through at Quincy with the use of a bridge . She noted that at 1 ... tlng she had attended at Clayton school they were told that the only reason a bridge was not put through at Quincy or further do.n was that Sheridan could not afford lt. She felt that the City should be able to work out so.ethlng with Sheridan . Director W1g90ntr, stated that the original proposal was to have a grade separation that wowld go all the way across the railroad tracks and Santa Fe at Oxford aftd 1ft tRterchange at Quincy . Thi"'UUtt the years and btcaus of the cblftgradtng on Quincy, both by C rry Htlh ¥111 and the overall .. ster plan for our streets " t .. tropolltaft area , the fact that Quincy did ROt hav a br , Ou ncy d d ROt to on througe. with rlght ·of -way fro. Sanh Fe, rid n too pos ft on that 0 ford shovld t con t on wlth Santa F £ng1 C 1 foll that po l on and ag that 0 ford h plat to t t on w th Santa F • • • -5- without Major iMPacts to the businesses there. To •ini•ize impacts they have left the right-in, right-outs. Today they are pretty low volume, however, when they co.e in for redeveloPMent they'll have to apply for an access permit from the State Highway Depart .. nt. At that ti .. they will reevaluate the situation. Mr. Te.ple stated that so.e day they would like to see a frontage road syste. in that area as it redevelops. Rick Torfin, officer of 1 co.pany on Stanford at Navajo, questioned whether they had a ti .. table to start work on Navajo? Mr. Te.ple responded yes, that Navajo would be one of the first pieces of roadway built. Next year they would start right-of-way acquisition and •aybe so.e construction on Navajo, but .are than likely they will start in 1991 . They need Navajo, at least between Quincy and Oxford to divert traffic to Quincy, while building the Oxford underpass. Mr . Torfin asked how .uch advance notice the people would be receiving? Mr. Te.ple stated regular updates would be provided to infor. of closures, phasing, and anything that •ight inconvenience people . Ernie Saucier, Saucier R V's, asked if any study had been done regarding tax revenue that will be lost when the west side businesses are closed off fro. the southbound traffic? He stated his business did not have any ingress or egress. Nr . Te~~ple stated the CORCept .. , to provide •adequate• access by furnishing a front191 road . He COftCeded that they would proDibly be a difference of opini011 011 lllhat .. , •adequate•. Mr . Saucier questiOMd lllho would pay for the frontage road? Nr . Te~~ple re.,....._. U.at .....,..lly the property ~MMrs are responsible for buildiftl the h•tental circt~lat • syst•. Nollllver, how that would be COMeCted to Ufti• ud lllho PtJS for tlaat cOMeCthM to Uni011 Is not clear at this ti... He stated l t .or\ traffic, trylft9 to get Into Sauc i er l V's, would hne to 1 U·t si9ftal at Uftt011 . on loss of sales ta tnt to be v ry bust s s. p $1 c r l . I • • • -6- alternatives are. Mr. Fraser stated that clearly the City is not in a position to afford that kind of project . Mr. Wiggins stated that costs increase over the years, perhaps even double, before the project is ca.pleted. He did not feel that the citizens could afford it. Maureen Duggan, Duggan Petroleu• at Stanford and Santa Fe, asked about what the State plans to do about all the trucks that use the Phillips Station? Mr. Te.ple said that they show the Phillips Gas Statton as a •take• because of the access probl .. s at that location. He explained that that ~ant they would have to acquire that property. The option would be hers if she wanted to re.atn, however, on the relocations they want to try to relocate the. back into the area at .are convenient locations. Council "--ber Kozacek ca..ented upon the reallocation of funds by the State Highway Depart.ent. Gary Shields, business at Wtnder.ere north of Tufts, ca..ented that with traffic counts on Oxford showing a projected increase fro. 6,000 to 12,000, and Oxford and Belleview being the only accesses to Santa Fe, that Oxford would be a huge bottleneck. Mr . T~~~ple responded that they are looking at the intersection of Navajo and Oxford on how best to design ft. They will be doing a ~lficatton to the current dest9n. They will four lane Oxford up to Navajo, then to the east drop to two lanes, which they feel will acc~ate the traffic. Eleanor S.ith, resides on Oxford, stated she was not clear on who wanted to close Quincy. Director w...,_r explained that at OM tt• Oxford was proposed to have a gr.O. separation all the .,.y across Santa fe, and Quincy was to be an tnterchuge. ...._ver, Qufncy was .... raded fn the overall •tropolttan •ster street plat~; Cherry Hflls Vlll~te did not want It to go through their cfty, and the Sheridan and Envle.ood Cfty COUftCtls took the posftfon that they •re fn favor of Oxford betnv t • tn COMec:t ton w th Santa Fe and Quincy could be clos..S. th f red IS to It r dan ld be contrtbut ng to t ts plan? tdlng on l pan, as ed f • vajo n w 1l Y~Jo . ld d st • • • • l • -7- An untdenttfted citizen stated he had already helped pay for cutting down the hill on Oxford. He wanted to know who was going to pay for the widening of Oxford if it's dee.ed necessary? Director Waggoner stated there are no plans to widen Oxford, just stripe it. Mike Burgan, who lives at Tufts and Kala .. th, asked if Navajo would be one or two lanes? Director Waggoner responded that Navajo will be 44 feet wide, one lane in each direction. Mr . Burgan felt that would create a bottleneck. Director Waggoner reiterated that Mr. Te.ple had just stated that they •ight have to widen it a little .ure at the Oxford intersection to provide a double left through and a right lane. Mr. T~~~ple stated they are projecting as .uch traffic on Navajo in the year 2010 as exists on Oxford today, approxi .. tely 6,000 to 7,000 vehicles a day . Council Mellber Kozacek questioned whether the nUIIber of co.ings and goings of ~~~ployees in the area had beeft considered? Mr . T~~~ple responded that yes they wre considered In their traffic projections . OM of the o.ners of ,.rfo,.. Brobrs (?) on the st side of Santa Fe and south of Kenyon , stated they had just re.odeled their showra. and asked about access . Nr . T~~~plo advhed t"-t the ff"'ftt• road syst• would have to be used to tet In Md out of that area . C.int south on S...ta fo they could tunt at Kenyon, or north 011 Santa fo they would have to tunt at O.ford to get Into t ff"'ftt• road syst . . Me told w t 1 would be .. lntatnlnt co s to t bus1Ns s dur "9 t period of cot~struc:t1011 . tf '1 of t c areas ! ld caus l 11y 11 , t • • • . . .. ~ . -8- Director Waggoner expliined thit Oxford is not striped now, they could stripe it for t~ lanes, one lane in either direction, with a.ybe sa.e turn lines down the •iddle. The triffic thit 's there now could travel Sifely ind not put .,ch pressure on any of the roadway if there were just t~ lines . Mr. Te.ple clirified thit they will be building 1 sa.ll piece of four-line roadway on Oxford up to the Navajo intersection, which will be paid for by the State Highway Depart~nt. The adjacent residents or businesses will not be hxed for that. Don Cooper inquired as to what the next step will be ind whit does the City of £ngl.-ood plan to do? City Nin~ter Fraser explained the City is still in the process of evaluating with the State the four alternatives. The City Council and staff of Public Works will ... t with hi• to provide direction on how to interact with the State on our future with respect to Santa Fe . All unidentified citizen asked how they will be advised of the decisions . City Nln~ter Fraser stated the Sentinel and Citizen wfll carry infon.~tion. Nlyor Van Oyb stated their Council they would choose to call t rs would be happy to update ttl .. , if All untdeftttfted citizen said that earl fer • Saucl r hid as ed tf he would be COIIIPeftsated for lack of access 101119 ..orth, llh property h located south of Union, he said did not hear the ans r . Mr . T..,le stated Jtr . Saucier -.y ella,. tt•at t re •tgllt be so. da.ates to hh property by rMIKI"' t tl.-ct of ceu htto II s property tllat has tod.,, by bet119 able to all h CMtt of h s properti today . But their txperte.ce is t t t rt t ·t~rl t ·CMtt c ss is tt access, at least in t '"' of t cCMtrt . Tllat s~t 't t ts ca ldft 't be dtffer'ftt. Ht ,..afft,_., t t t w 11 be a U·t at t • • • ...... . . . , • f .. • .. • -9- Union, they •tght look into it. They just could not justify the 1ddition1l expense of taking out so.e .. jor buildings to get to Union to provide th1t service road south. Nr. Waechter expressed concern that if we hold off on this project, which needs to be done, it will end up costing us .. ny •illions of doll1rs to do it because of cost increases. Director Waggoner agreed th1t if it is not put in now, it would indeed be .are expensive at 1 later date. Councfl .....,_r lkbenicht uked if they would be recessed at Nanjo 12 feet on Oxford? Mr. Tt!llple stated that it was •re like four or five feet, which is .,.sed on tht ~viron.ental assess.ent approved thnee or four years ago. Councfl .....,_r lkbenicht questiOMd, INsed on traffic counts and projections which wrw llede of the four alternatives (thnee of which call for 1 depression for the raflroad tracks), if thtre arw sipificant differences in their f111»acts on Oxford traffic in the residential area? Dirwctor W1990Mr rwsponded no, that tht .. jor cha119e Is bet~ Navajo and Santa Fe. Councfl .....,_r lkbenicht stated that •ther thtre fs a depression or bypass, her Uftderstaftdi!MJ ts that the four -laM S«tion of Oxford will 90 all the way to Broadway. Dirwctor WavtDMr explained that tht four liM S«tton e.ould 90 fro. Santa Fe to Navajo Mel theft taper INck to b•o -lMes towards Kila..th . COURCtl .....,_r Habelticht stated that 110M of tht proJ«ts calls for the Meesstty of havtiMJ four 1 s f,.. Navajo to ......._, througtl tht rwsidenttal ...... fir . T~~~ple stated te..t .. , con-ect. Dt rwctor r slated t. t It dots -.t It Tufts or Ullion, Oxford s lbou c t a lot. of di ff: • t you do 0 t • • .. • ~ ...... ~ ... ' .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ ....... ~"" .... , ............ ,.. .. -10- point the State only intends to put up Sl •illion to provide sa.e type of connection as to the alternatives A, 8, C, or D. Mr. Watson asked if there -.re any ideas as to when the final decision will be llide? Director Waggoner stated it will have to be ude fairly soon, as the Highway Depart.ent is ready to begin the final design, with construction starting as soon as possible. He noted that the State Highway Depart~nt is under a lot of pressure fro. the Air Pollution Co..ittee to ca.plete the Santa Fe Corridor. Mr . T-.ple stated that they will proceed with acquisition next year, and construction in 1n1. Charles Todd (?), expressed his concern with the nUIIber of people and bust•sses affected ud tu dollars that wtll be spent to relocate these people. He suggested an alternative to the Navajo proposal that would involve T-intersections. Director MaggDner stated that his proposal really wouldn't change anyth ing. You could bring • Wiftderwre to T into Tufts, part of Navajo is already butlt, Md Jog over to 111.,.re which h •re than a 90 degree turn, and theft 90 • QuiRCy Md llavajo, it 1s Just not u s.oth a flow u they want to provide . Howver, it 1s u alternative . Nr. TIIIIPle stated that it was the original rec-..ctatton . The intet~t with llavajo h to eRCourage traffic to use llavajo rather than fflter up through the •ifhbort.oods. Wiftderwre ...,ld foster •re people •fgrath'9 through the •i~s . . Todd questi-.d U.. relocathMI of busi•sses . . T le stated that r t they have M relocation planned under t lavajo ,-o,osal . n.ent ld be .._ acqufsft ons . t -out . y 1 • t • - . '' • • • : .. : .. =~ -11- Ji• Skaggs, o.ner of El Maderos on S1nt1 Fe, st1ted th1t three of the projects had wiped hi• out . He uked why the State put the service ro1d behind hh business 1nd what does he have left? He does not understand the econo.ics of it. Mr. Te.ple stated that the frontage road to the west of El Maderos was 1 reca..endation fro. the City of Sheridan, as they felt it was the best w1y to serve future develop.ent. He noted that custo.ers to El Maderos would hne access at the Union sign1lized intersection. Mr. Skaggs explained how difficult it was going to be for any custo.er to gain access to his restaurant. Council Me.ber Kozacek ca..ented on the State Highway Depart.ent 's dealings with the City of Sheridan. He felt that Engle.ood has beeft short changed. An unidentified citizen questioned the safety of pedestrians crossing Oxford , particularly to use the Recreation Center. Mayor Van Dyke stated that Council has 1 obligation to be totally ~Ware of the transition that occurs as they begin to close streets and rebuild Intersections. The City Traffic EngiMer will be instructed to keep t..._ abreast of the clwtges in traffic so that ttMy can be addressed, u they are very viable concerns. An Uftidefttifted citizen asked if they are 901"9 to drop the intersection 1t Navajo fCMir or five fHt, CCMild they not drop tt elgt.t or ten feet and let the kids 90 under? Mr. Te~~Ple cluffied that the entire Intersection at Navajo and Oxford will be dropped fCMir to five fHt. The pedestrius will cross at grade at the sigNltzed intersection. There wtll not be 1 pedestriu underpass at that locatton. Mayor Vu Dyb stated that Mr. Te~~Plt was txplahtf"9 the curnttt plus for that l~tterchuge. ......_r, Ctty eo-en, to address so. of t cone rns for pedestrlu crossl"9s will be s.parat ng CMit those cone rns to 1 at specifically ud c-up w th rec. t ons . An Ufttdefttlfted clttz st -.d t s 1 ty of a "9 Tufts jog ftlo vajo . She felt that cuttl-. off trafftc at Tuft ld only pus t on o Oxford, creat ng a v ry rous sttuat • or V " Oy • • • . . • -1 2- The ~ting ended At 9:25 p.• . . . . DiPirtYc ty c1 er I • - . .... . . ' ss /l J L · ~ /7 6 ~?-0 ;;,...-- .s r - -' / 116 -r / r ..,......, ,; 7~ .-.// J ~ ..-- _) / #v "" .J I , . -.. .. .. . . . . .. ., 'I • •..... • • / ~-;; / / • - L I • - /f J nrP 7' ~ (_ ~/" 2V ,[,1/1_/lthneUl C-So -t ~ ;a~~ a-u~ If -~ ( _r-QP?· ~ 0 ~ ~/'- 7[1, Jf_ I . • • - · D a/ktP_ ~ 1 s /- ~~ /?.__ ,L_ / ~~ ({_; ~ /2__ -J /0) /1~ I ( cL v-'-_/ ~ ;s- __.f2_:J; q;;7V )f _,--.. u 5i ./ l___..; lcf ~~ ~R d)!~ ....-z7/ q· /Yl y /7~/,) /-t,· ~ / J /)J • • • • • • . " . . . . ....... \ ........... I 7 s- 1 v I . • • - " • • "' • ,. .. r . ~Mu_ (}~ I c~~~·;:-<--j ~ ~ -v _ .P a .... uz c;L.) --z (/ y :AG d/'uo ~ ~.7 c3SCo ~ t/9ca c.... (J__,_ c... r / '-----" J--& / -. n ) < r c.__· -....,..=r I . • • , . - • • t • t 0 ' f f I # <' f 0 I • • * 0 o o 0 o • o o • o o 0 • o o ., o • ,_ • • 1 1 0 o 1 t • 1 t 0 ~ $ _/!-~ f 9~ ~ /~ ~<-~ ~r a-u_ c_ ~ ,---..,.-_ ~ ~ ~ox /44 I . • • - p • .. t I I • • 0' •• 1111 • • I I I I I 1 ·a cc -cYrY; / ~ ;s~ ./ . .-QJ c..-/~ ~ ~ ~---v' 0 -o c:::r-r I '-d < £__ /) )C!. $u J ,...__ J~ ( ~rl-/ j I c ,-~ -.) . Oz., IL • • • . . ............... ~ . . ... . . .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. ...... . (, ',L-t ,_h_ 1--1 -c__.) ?"~ ,.. y w~ -c../ JO <.::> !,1 / I I • • • I • • ,. • . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . . .. .. .... . ... ... . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . ... . . .. . .. . 7 /!tJJ · ;?_. )<~. z ~ r .,;::. __....., tl/ v (---.--/tP---; ~ y _.c:.--, . r daL -\ .. ..... '?-' I ( (/ "' ,;:;t ~ c--..._ / .. ;;.. ~ 9 ~ , t -(;, t?/.) ( ?- f I • • • • • .. 4 • ~ • ' • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • j·· y v ~ (} c; /}/) ~7 0/ t./7C ~--~ A----= v /} ---o J ,--S F~/\ ( L U ~"' U c..::>'-<:..-<..~--<:A ~e-G 7.,,/ /',.ceo IY' -.. . ,., , I • • • . . . . . . . . . ~ . .. . r I • • • o-• o • o I • • o o • o •• o • 4<'~---~u ~. ~ C2t&-y {~A ,. ~~ -/ .F;L---9' ~ 7 , -/ I • • - o • o o • lllo o • • C • o I o t • •,.. .-• '"' o o ., o • • • o 1Jzd:ce ~'!12-vu - L_) A/~/~~ ~ f/c_j ~ -~ L G F~( ~~~ I "CCO a-o -CR_,.. r /ceo ~~~ • • - . " . . ...... ~ . .. . . . :Jctl~ ;J ?O ~7 c. J ~~- " I • - • - , • • • \ v ~ c_.. , y, ,../"' v _j~ _.L..--t.~~t. ~ ) I • • • . . . .. ~~ <:?_? c/ @Ld ~. f-_~ /2/C<.--tr/c:) n/l ___, _, -r.rl./2---t:.e_ vc_ 0)-- <:_ ~.-c 2 C/ ;..------., ~ "" ~ ,,. --~.___/X / ~~ 3 ? ~d~ I"" , _/. -~~ <!". /.-v' '- X .J,~ tl .. I yo~! I y "') /(_ • • • , ;.;. I • • • . ' ) J I • • - ) ) 1 7 v • • • (.L. ' , I' 9 ? I • • • r~~(f~~~ c:fJ 'l-tJ7 d / C-Y . (,/ ~ ~ 7. ..L. ---~ :-; ,..., (.... I • • .. - ~ ;1~ ~'-__/ /LLR ~ 1- ~ r-~~ i-<:2CJ . --=-~ 0 )-/?v ~-v Q U/1 u cf/1~//'U lj_ '/ 'tl L(~ It cu _/ (.) ,- 1 sF~"( l ;J.< J. ,""_) \ I • • • ~~=-l- <SP ~t-<-~ / ~ ~er--r-.s-:...v---; ~ £_d;y fl J~ ~ '-----~~ IV~o \,.___....; - ( • • • I . • • • , I . . • • • • I . . • • • 8DfCLUJt IIIDDta 8CIM)OL AODI'I'OJliUII 300 W. CIIDAifGO AVD~tq TIIUit8DlY, OC'l'OBD 5, lilt 7100 P.ll. I. Weloa.e and IntroducUona -llayor 8\aaan Van Dyke ~toter rn..r, City ......,_ II. ~taUon -.. lh We1101116Z', Director of ~Uc Woru A. aanta Pa Project Biatory and OWUView a. KenyonJOXfol"d/Quiftcy lliatory e. 'l'Ufta/Uftlon Project AlternaU,.. III. Queetlona and Anften City of b9lewood 8t.aff and COlorado Dapu'bent of IIi ya 8t.aff vill be avallable to anMMr ...-u .... I . . • • • • • Cc l q 10 ME ETING COMMENCE D AT 7:10 P.M. VAN DYKE WELECO MED CITIZENS AND EXPLAINED FORMAT FOR PRESENTATIONS. IDEA BEHIND ~1EETING IS TWO-FOLD -1) PROVIDE INFO RMATION ON POSSIBLE CONNECTION OF SOUTH SANTA FE DRIVE TO THE CITY, AND 2) OBTA IN CITIZE N INPU T ON THE INF ORNATION BEING PRESENTED. FRASER -SANTA FE CORRIDOR NEED ED TO ASSURE THE FUTURE OF THE CITY. WITH COOPERATION OF THE STATE , THE SANTA FE CORR IDOR CAN AND WILL BE THE MOST ATT RACTIVE ROADWAY. NEED TO DE TERMI~E WHAT 'S BEST FOR THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. AS SURED THE CIT IZENS THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF ALTERNATIVES ON THE DRAWING BOAR D. MENTIONED TH E IHPAc:TS AND WHAT THE FUTURE IS FOR ONE SCENERIO OVER THE OTH ER. INTRODUCED OTHERS ON TH E PODIU M -RAGLAND, WANUSH, TEMPLE, WAGGONER. KELLS WAGGONER PRESENTED THE OVER ALL PROJECT OF THE CORRIDOR, AND BRIEFLY EXPLAIN ED THE FOUR ALTERNATIVES WHICH AFFECT THE TUFTS /UNION AREA, USING BLOWN UP AREA SLIDES. C0~1ENTS: GRADE SEPARATION AT DARH10UTH AND SAf TA FE HAMPDEN IMPROV(D INTERCHANGE PUC RULLING WAS TO CLOSE KEtiYO I A VEt UE OXFORD AVENU -QUitCY GRADE SEPARATIO AT RAILROAD TRACKS -GRADE INTER SECTIO N AT OXFO D QUI Will B CLOSED ROAD I Oi 0 ro Off A ;.JO AliC, r T ', TO TUFTS c c l . CCESS -ROAD OFF SANTA FE TO THE WEST I . • - • • • • c· M!Oo'S 1. SHERYL EASTMAN (SOUTH HUR Ot, NORTH OF OXF ORD) EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT INCREASED TRAFFIC 0 OXFORD. ST ATED OXFORD IS BADLY MARKED. OXFORD IS ALREADY PROBLEI·l, AND WI Til THE KEllY ON CLOSUR E, SHE FELT TRUCK TRAFFIC WOULD TRIPLE. ASKED IF Ifi LL WILL BE CUT DOWN, AND HOW ABOUT TRAFFIC LIGHTS ON OXFORD? KELLS RESPONDED: THERE ARE SIGNALS ON OXFORD NOW; HILL WAS CUT DOWN YEARS AGO, AND BECAUSE OF CITY DITCH, NO WAY TO CUT IT DOWN LOWER. GRADE SEPARATION COULD POSSIBLY SOLVE SO ME OF THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS, THAT AND STRIP THE STR EET . KELLS AGREED THAT TRAFFIC WILL CERTAINLY INCREASE WITH THE CLOSURE. 2 . DON COOPER (LIV ES ON OXFORD) CO MMENTED THAT SOMETHING SHOULD BE DONE ABOUT TRUCK DRIV ERS. EXPRESSE D ANGER ABOUT THE BUSINESSES WHICH WOULD BE DISPLACED, COMMENTING UPOIJ THE HlPTY BUILDINGS IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA WHICH HAS AFFECTED TAX REVENUE . VAtl DY KE STATED THAT ISSUF WAS NOT RELE VANT TO THE PURPOSE OF THE TOWN l[TitlG. WANUSII OfFERED DATA m 1982 TAX BA SE COMPARED TO ANTICIPATED REVf UES 0~ Sl. M. 3 . D VE PA UL (BUSINESS OWtiER WHO RELIES 0 HEA VY TRAFF IC) INQUIRED ABOUT THE TRAFFIC COU T, PARTICULARLY Ot OPTION ~l) 4. U 10£ TIFIED CIT lZE C NTEO UPO THE NUMBER OF BUS IN ESSES AND HOMES ICII WILL BE AFFECT D. AS ED lf CONSIDERATION HAD BEE N GI VEN TO HOW DOl I AL ES OUlD BE FFECTEO ALO G OXFORD 20 YEARS FROM NOW IF 0 FO 0 SEC 4 LA ES . ll (S 0 T AT THERE IS £t OUC H RIGHT ·OF -AY CURRE NTLY TO FOUR -LANE OXfO H SlAlEO A I THAT OXFORD lS THE 0 L PROPOSED ACCESS TO SANTA [. s. ; TAT D ID T A I f.ATH TO T JTH TA J • I . • • • 7. HOWARD MCG REGOR, ENGLE WOOD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, STATED THAT IN GENERAL THE BUSINESS CO MMUNITY DOESN 'T CARE IF TUFTS IS CLOSED OR LEFT OPEN, AS LONG AS THER E IS A NORTH SIDE ACCESS. 8. LINDA CRAWFORD (SANTA FE BUSINESS) INQUIRED WHAT ADDITIONAL FOOTAGE WILL BE TAKEN AND ABOUT THE TYP E OF FINISH (FENCE) TO BE ALONG THE SANTA FE CORRIDOR, 20 FT. FEN CE, OR WHAT? TEMPLE -WILL BE EAST OF SA NTA FE LINE???? REGARDING FENCE, NONE IS PLANNED IN THIS AREA. 9. UNIDENTIFIED CITIZ EN -REQUESTED OTHER ALTER NATIVES. 10 . DAN HAN (?), DECAL CO. ASKED ABOU T WINDERMERE NORTH AND SOUTH. PLANS DOW T MAKE SENSE CAN'T SEE ~lONEY BEING SPENT THERE. 11 . DOl CAMERON (PROPERTY O~rlER SO UTH OF UNION , WEST SIDE OF SANTA FE) ASKED ABOUT ACCES ROADS OUTH OF UNION. TE PLE -TO MINIMIZE IM PACT RIGHT-IN, RIGHT -OUTS. SEES THEM AS LOW VO LU E. 12 . RIC TORPIN ASKED ABOUT TIMETABLE TO START WOR ON NAVAJO . ADVANCE IOTJCE? T£ PlE -0 £ OF Til( rl ST PlfCES OF ROAD AY BUILT -199 1. REGARD ING '• Tl r , £ Pl( AID THE WOULD UTILIZE WS RELEASES. 1~. [ IE ??? A ED IF A r TUD HAD BEEN REGARDING TAX REVENUE THAT Will BE LOST [ THE W ST SIDE GUS! ESSES ARE CLOSED OFF FROM THE OUTIIBOU D TRAFFIC? STATED HIS BUS! [SS 010 NOT HAVE ANY INGRESS OR [(; ss . Tl TAGE ROAD. IE 01 [ I TO G T I TO 80 l SSES. 'T IS . T T TATl • l I . -• • • L:PLE -AT THIS POINT IT'S A TAKE, TRY TO RELOCATE THEM BACK INTO LEWOOD. ACEK COMMENTED UPON THE REALLOCAT ION OF FUNDS BY THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. 1 17 ,. GARY SHIELDS, BUSINESS 011 ~JINDER1·1ERE rmRTH OF TUFTS, COMMENTED THAT WITH TRAFFIC COUNTS ON OXFORD UPPED TO 12,000 FROM 6,000 AND OXFORD AND BELLEVIEW THE ONLY TWO STREE TS TO GET ONTO SANTA FE, THAT OXFORD WOULD BE A HUGE BOTTLENECK. TE11PLE -LOOKING AT THE INTERSECTIO N OF NAVAJO AND OXFORD ON HOW BEST TO DESIOGN IT. WILL BE DOING A MODIFICATION TO THE CURRENT DESIGN, ADDING /ADDITIONAL LANES; FOUR LANE OXFORD UP TO NAVAJO, THEN TWO LANE TO THE EAST; WILL ACCOMMODATE IT . 18 . ELEANOR SMITH, LI VE S ON OXFOR D, STATED SHE WAS NOT CLEARN ON WHO WANTED TO CLOSE QUINCY. KELLS PROVIDED INFORMAT!Ol ON WH Y QUINCY WAS CLOSED -SHERIDAN, ETC. SMITH AS ED WHAT IS SHERI OA N CONTRIBUTING TO THIS? 19. UNIDENTIFIED CITIZEN WHO LIVES ON LIPAN ASKED IS NAVAJO GOING TO BE DESIGNED TO CARRY THE TRUCK TRAFFIC? TEMPLE · YES, TRAFFIC WILL FLOW S OOTHLY ALONG NAVAJO . ElLS-lOT MUCH CHAtGE IN CURRENT PATTERN ON LIPAN. KELLS ALSO EXPLAINED THAT COUfCIL HAD SUPPORTED SHERIDAN'S RESOLUTION RE QUINCY CLOSURE. 20. BOB CHROEDER. ENGLEWOOD SCHOOL BOARD, STATED THE SCHOOL BOARD HAD TAKEN A U AI I US POSITION A D READ l EXCERPT FROM LETTER REGARDING SAFETY OF THE SCI OOL CHILDREI CROSS! G TUrTS. 11L ,, • 1 l (I • '· TO IOEI 0 FORO, JUT STRIP IT. 0 -ILL IT BE [A It DIR CT I rr AJO I 2010 AS liST ox AFfECT 0, TC. TAT 0 . .. • 3 • I . • • • 24. UNIDENTIFIED CITIZEN ASKED IF ANY OF THE CHANGES WOULD CAUSE REZONING THAT WOULD AFFECT RESIDENTIAL ARE AS. KELLS -NOTHING TO BE INITIATED . 25. FAIRY ????, 4500 BLOCK OF SOUTH HURO N -WILL TRAFFIC INCREASE? ELLS -TRAFF IC WILL TAKE PAT H OF LEAST RESISTENCE, SO YES, THERE WILL BE ~ SOME INCREASE, BUT PR OBABLY NOT MORE TRUCKS. FRASER -WHEN NAVAJO IS COMPLETED, THE TRAFFIC WILL FLOW THAT WAY. 26. COOPER -ASKED ABOUT CRITERIA FOR FOUR LANES ON OXFORD, STATING OXFORD WAS ALREADY A FOUR-LA~E. LLS -SAID OXFORD WAS UOT STR IP PED FOUR LANE. TRAFFIC THAT IS THERE NOW COULD TRAVEL SAFELY AND NOT PUT ~UCH PRESSURE ON THE ROADWAY IF THERE WERE JUST TWO LANES. TEMPLE -WILL BE BUILDING A FOUR-LANE SHORT STRETCH UP TO THE NAVAJO I TERSECTIO . ~OPER · 'HAT IS THE NE XT STEP -WHAT DOES ENGLEWOOD PLAN TO 007 FRA . ER · TILL EVALUATHIG THE FOUR ALTERNATES; CITY COUNCIL WILL BE EUitG TO PROVIDE OIRECTIO Otl UO TO INTERACT WITH THE STATE; SENTINEL AD CITZ£1 Will CARR INFO ATIO . 27. U 10 TIFED CIZI T N (SALSE '??)A EO HOW SALSER Wi ll BE REIMBURSED FOR HI LOST ACCESS? 7 • 31. IGHT·II Rl HT·OUT IS AD QUATE ACCESS, HAVEN 'T HAD TO PAY DAMAGES Will B A AILA l£ AT U 10 . QUI Y ???? Sl AT I T RS CTION 0 LIP AND p L£ 7??7 'l • T 0 C T ll TO llO IT AT I . 0 AT I • • • • TE MPLE -FOUR OR FIV E FEE T -PR ELI MINA RY DESIGNED BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS MENT APP RO VED 3-4 YEARS AGO. HABE NI CHT -2 . ON TRAFFI C COUN TS AND PRO J ECTIO NS WHICH WERE MADE ON THE FO UR ALTER NATE S -A. B. C OR D, THREE OF WHICH HAVE A DEPRESSION, ARE THE IR SIGN IFI CANT DI FFER EN CES I N IMP ACT S? KELLS -MAJ OR CHA NGE IS BETWEEN NAVAJO AND SANTA FE. HABEN ICHT -3 . IF TH ER E I S A DEPRESS ION ON A BYPASS , HER UNDERSTANDING IS THAT Til E FO UR-L ANE SEC r ION THAT YO U ARE TAL KING ABOUT, IS TO ALL THE WAY TO BROADWAY? KE LLS -FO UR LAN E SECTIO N WOULD BE FR OM SAN TA FE TO NAVAJO AND THEN TAPER BACK TO TWO -L ANE . HABE IC HT -4 . I ONE OF THE PROJECTS CAL L FOR THE NEC ESSIT Y OF HAVING FOUR LANE S FRO NAVAJO TO BROAD WAY? TE PLE-CORRECT. flABE lCHT -5. 'H T II f'P EN TO WI DERHERE A D UNTION ON FIRST THR EE ALTER ATIVES? ELLS -WI DE ERE WOU LD TIE I ~TO THE NAVAJO ALIGNMENT . 32 . OA E WA l OO'l? (TUFTS A 0 I CA) -Of THE FOUR ALTER ATIVES, WHICH ONE WI LL BE •• SAlTA FE I GOING TO BE BUILT. THE RUCT AV AJO DOWN TO TUFTS; STATE PUTT ING • C, 0 D. L U SIG HA Y TO B IWl 1 T 0 0 TH EAR . PROPOS 0 • AJO TAl I • • • SALSER -WHAT ALTERNATIVE DID THE CITY COUNCIL AGREE TO -WHAT ARE THEY IN FAVOR OF? VAN DYKE -COUNCIL DOESN'T AGREE WITH ONE PARTICULAR ALTERNATIVE AT THIS TIME -DIFFEREN CES OF OPENIO N. WIL L BE ASKING CITY COUNCIL TO MAKE STATE MEN TS ABOUT THE ALTERNATIVES LATER IN THE MEETING . HOPEFULLY COME UP WI TH THE BEST RESOLUTION. 35 . CARLA DAVIDSON, 560 PEN NW OOD CIRCLE -STATED THE REAL PURPOSE OF TONIGHT'S ~1 EETING IS TO HEAR THE ALTERNATIVES. COUNC IL SHOULD TAKE CARE OF THE TRAFFIC PROBLEMS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN AND AROUND THE SCHOOLS AS THEY HAVE EVIDENCED IN THE PAST. 36. Jlf1 SCAGGS, ELMADERO Ot l SANTA FE -THREE OF THE PROJECTS WOULD WIPE HIM OUT. ASKED: NO. I -WHY DID THE ST ATE PUT THE SERVICE ROAD BEHIND HIM? AND NO. 2 -WH AT DOES HE HAVE LErT. DOESN 'T UNDERSTAND THE ECONOMICS TEMPLE -DONE AT THE RECO~~ENDATION OF THE CITY OF SHERIDAN WHO FELT THE FRONTAGE ROAD WEST Of EL HADERO WOULD BEST SERVE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. SCAGGS DISAGREED. OZACEK -CO -1EfHS REGARDING THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 'S DEALINGS WITH C JTY OF SHER !DAti liAS HORT CIIA GED £ GLEWOOD. 37. U I IDE TIFIED CITlZEI QUESTIO 1£0 IIOW OXFORD WILL BE AFFECTED FOR PEDESTRIAIS CROSSI G £ ST. VAN DY E • V IABLf COt C £RII. T£. PLE · liiE WHOLE I TERS CliO T AVAJO WILL BE DROPPED 4 TO 5 FEET AS WELL AS OXFORD. PEDE IRIAtS Ill C OSS AT GRAD AT SIGNAL . 38. U JOE TJFIED CITIZE RE CO I CliO Of TUFTS JOGGI NG INTO NAVAJO -WHAT 00[ CUlT! G OFF TRAFFICT 0 TUFTS 00 BUT PUSH THE M ONTO OXFORD • SI MILAR TO r S II CH RRY Hill Vlll GE. 39 . c CLA PAVI G. AGREED WITH SHUTTI TR T. E 0 ENFORCE T 0 FICERS 10 S REAllY STI • • I . • • • • HATHAWAY -NORTHWEST END or TOWN. SANTA FE CON CERNS ALONG DARTMOUT. COMMITMENT TO MAKE SURE MITIGATING DEVISE CAN KE EP THE TRUCK TRAFFIC OUT OF THE AREA TO THE EAST. HABENI CHT -PROVIDE ADEQUATE AC CESS TO IND USTRIA L AND COHHERICAL AREA . PROTECT THE RESIDENTIAL AREAS AriD AT TH E SA ME TI ME BE COST EFFECTIVE. LEANING TOWARD ALTER NATE D -THINKS IT WOULD ANSWER ALL OF TH E CON CE RNS AND HAVE LESS IMPA CT ON THE RESIDENTIAL STREETS. KOZA CEK -SANTA FE CORR ID OR IS HHAT GO T HIM INTO CO UN CIL 4-5 YEARS AGO. CONCERfl ED ABOUT THE KIDS AND TH EIR SAFETY. TRUCK TRAFFI C WIL L TRAVEL NAVAJO . CAR TRAF FIC WILL GO ACROSS INTO RESIDENTIAL AREA . DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THE POSITION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT. CO NCERN ED ABOUT THE CENTENNIAL AREA -HOW WILL WE BE ABLE TO SUPPLY THEM WITH POL I CE AND FIRE PROTECTION? CONCERNlD ABOUT ALL THE CITIZENS , ETC., ETC . fNDED -9:25 P.M. • 7 • I I . • A Nuaber of Businesses I•pacted Nuaber of Eaployees Nuaber of Residences I•pacted Tax Revenues (Total) Sales ' Use Property (Schools) Property (City) Coat of ROW coat of construction Total Coat • • • 4 52 3 $37,479 15,984 18,079 3,416 1.7 -2.4 Million $4.9 Million $6.6 -7.3 Million I . • • - • • B NUJiber of Buaineaaea Iapacted 4 NUJiber of bployeea 52 NUJiber of Reaidence• Iapacted 3 Tax Revenue• (Total) $37,479 Sale• ' Uae 15,984 Property (Schoola) 18,079 Property (City) 3,416 coat of ROW $1.7 -2.4 Million Coat of Conatruction $4.9 Million Total Coat $6.6 -7.3 Million c Nuaber of Businesses Iapacted Nuaber of Eaployeea Nuaber of Residences Iapacted Tax Revenues (Total) Sales ' Use Property (Schools) Property (City) Coat of ROW Coat of Construction Total Coat • • • 3 102 5 $38,784 23,175 13,137 2,472 $2. 4 Million $4.8 Million $7.2 Million • I . . D Number ot Businesses I•pacted Number ot Eaployees Number ot Residences I•pacted Tax Revenues (Total) Sales ' Use Property (Schools) Property (City) Co s t ot ROW Cost ot Construction Total Cost • • • 1 15 2 $2,173 -o- 1,828 345 $0.5 Million $1.1 -2.1 Million $1.6 -2.6 Million 0 I . • -• • • SIJfCIAIR MIDDLE SCHOOL AUDI'l'ORIOII 300 If. CIIDAHGO AVDUJ: TIIURS~Y I OCTOBER 5 I lilt 7:00 P.M. I. lfeloo.e and IntroductioM -Mayor •uaan Van Dyke Roger rreeerl City Kana9er II. Preeentation -Jtelle wawoner 1 Director of 1\ablio Worke A. 8anta re Project Bi•tory and OVerview a. Kenyon/OxfOrd/Quincy Hbtory c. '1'\lfta/Uftion Project Alternau,.. III. Quutione and Anewen City of bcJlewood 8taff and colorado DepartJient of Hifbvey• 8taff will avallable to anaver queatione. • I . • • . .. . . . . · .. : .......................... •.• .... , ',., ... •J;;;;: ·; 'i:ii~· "· ') ;'): i ; . lljh) -I) I -~ I I d 07 v 7 :J 1 I 1 I -tdt// /d ,t}/ tfl...f_ I I/~- J - I • • • • I • ~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • "• • • • • • '• • .,. • • ''"'-' • • • • """""'· • • I • \ I<' •'; I' • • ' • • ~ • • • • ' ' • • • • " • > ' > • ' ' ' • • . .-1./k .JJ f.; C:~Jw -11 -'A .A / /i d7 , ~ j/ ~ ltJfk4--- ./ /J r-. ~ , r J f&/,, :J/.; t// • • r T I' T _.>I-' I-'_.'> I'' .. , , I # 1 ;' • • • • > ) .. , 1 <',, , r 'r , , , ',,.,., , • , ,..,.,..,., J , , , > ,r ,I ,·_,,, • J" • > > • , • • • • • • • • • • • • • <" • • • • , , I I (J;h I ) l.,h (_J ' )'.)/..,/./Me I )oJ.. l1· ' t' -J :J.N-f~ ~~ -;,_ • • I . • • r f" ~ ",• • '\ ~ !> • ~ l J 1 r l • t I ' K t • ' 1 '\ l l • • '• • -, ...-·. ""' ._ 4 ,F •""• • t -, # ~ .. • • • t ·~, # I • I • • ~., ,_ ' .,. ". • ~ • ,,..,_ P 11 >,;;I • • ,. • • /J.J WA/u rJ~ fk ' I 1 1 /tf { /J ) j.b ~ 1 flt.J I /_..(./ tfJ •' j//Jl I 1.1' / "'-_:_!fd!-- -/ ~~ /il Jfl1 //..(/ I I J IJ! - I . • l y ~ --)z, u .,.. f ll«.l~ .It 1 i.Jd.l ~ .J 'bfL .1 ; # f. .) ~"' ub tP 1 ~ M//m It i.U , I .,':/. {/ r UJ #j Y I .f. yj # ·./ {/., ft I l I • • ••~• ;t" '•·~~ f•1? I '~--,, ••~tat.lll,.-~-.,...,,,..,, ... ., ..... ~,,.,,·,.,,• • .-, •• ..; ~. ,., ,.,..,,,..~~ .,.,.., . Ill-_,~- -;/ 1/ / ~ , _/PI I dt._ f., r'"' • A I - j_..t jl • • //l///7 1'"-/;d~-~ , vu.:f ~~ ~ t!T 'I i'/ dltlltV.., .Jv -&b !J~ - -' , / • ''~''"'" r • .~r ... "'"' '~'•'• , .•.•• .,,,.. . .. '•• ............. . • • ./ _/Y,_. ~ __,. (>..., ./ 1 1'7 1 .~" -, 1/J 1 -;-}) ....r- -....,/./"" !. -)P ~ / >.r-/11 ,;;/~f-j :J~ cf.ur. tJ J_p;JJ I J-}. J i (j ;f-) /, J I ,{ - ./)J. I '.A -r ~ ::;_, 1././_V "-r ?;/ • -.J , J..J J (L ---/' I. ;../'.1;1_ 7 -.././}!. I I I I I I ' )~(k / lJ 1. J - • • • • .. ... •J .... -• * • • •., • J I • • I,.·., • • • • .-.-.-• ~ ,._ •• ... ... -. ,, ... ·~ .... , .... ~,. ..... J ........... . I • .. . .., ,. . . . . . . . • . . . .. • . . . . • . . . , . • .. • • ~ · •• ., , • • • . , -~ •,, · · , 'r r. 1 I - I . • • • , ........ ~ .. ~ ............... _ • • . • .. .. • .. ........ t., ~ , ~ ... ,. .... , • • -~ .. ~ ·' t ' t r r . t • - I[ cf~ //IVV'J"-' -,..)~ t/.J?LI.J~ ,/_ ) -!/UJ ~ .... or...t.,_,.-::4 , ./)(/. /~ . ./ -"' 'I I • • .. ~ . .. . .. .. .. .. .. ~ ........................ . ·· ............. '··· JJ. '/]II -.!~ j~ ~/} ,/ J I './.. -/ • • .... .-........... .-.... ... ······ )j;/J-1! -IJJJJ J ,j 1 '/~r;JJ r.J11/1J/;;{,4 1 ~11PJ/J ~1 J An---f./1.-U ) V,y~lz ~v., )q /..J f tl£d /t. .. ;A 'h /I.J 1/Jlf - • • ........ , ... ~ .. ; I .