HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-10-20 (Public Hearing) Meeting Agenda•
•
• •
Special Public Hearing City Council
October 20, 1988
0
• -
•
, . •
0
~_;d ~AI. 0
C::Ocf-zo} ;ct.?!
72 7:3 7</ 7.)
I / ./ •
•
• I . .
• •
•
•
• •
fMI E1IDCm CITY CCIUIICI L
EWIDIDCm, MAP._ CCUITY, COLOUDO
Special Session
OctoMr 20, 1-
I. The special ~ttng of the Englewood City Council was called to order by
Mayor Van Dyke at 7:15 p.•. The Invocation was given by Council Me.ber Kol -
tay . The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Van Dyke. Roll was called .
Present:
Absent:
A quoru. was present.
Council Metlbers Hathaway, Koltay, Kozacek, Habenicht,
Clayton, Van Dyke
Council Metlber Byrne
Council Ne.ber Byrne entered the ~ttng at 7:16 P·•·
Also present: Acting City MAnager Waggoner
City Attorney DeWitt
City Clerlt Crow
2. Mayor Van Dyke announced that the purpose of the special ~ting was to
set the •ill levy for property tax in the City of Englewood to becc.e effec -tive January 1, 1919.
Counc i1 B i 11 No. 34 was ass t gned a ftUIIber and read by t f t 1 e :
ORDINANCE NO. 31, SERIES OF 1911, llfTIIODUCED BY COUNCIL MDIBER HABENICHT :
AN OIIDUWICE FIXIIG THE TAX lEVY II MillS UPG1 EACH DOLLAR OF THE ASSESSED
VALUATION OF All TAXABlE PIIOPERTY WITHII THE CITY OF EIGLEWOOO, COlORADO, AM>
ESTABLISHING A Mill lEVY FOR THE EIGLEWOOO, COLORADO, DOWNTCMI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .
CCIUIICIL ._. HAIEIIICHT IIDWED, CCIUIICJL ._. Ul.TAY SU.O, TO Al'fiD(
-IIIAK£ •. 31, SOlES Of 1-.
Ayes : Council Metlbers Koltay, Hathaway, Kozacek, Byrne ,
lllays: Habenicht, Clayton , Van Dyke
None
Abstain : None
None Absent :
Motfon carried .
3 . CCIUIICIL .,_. UlACEl IIDftD TO .... The ~tlng adjourned at 7 :17 p •••
•
I . •
•
•
• •
AG~ FOR THE
SPECIAL IIDTIJIG OP'
THE EIICL!!WOOD CITY COOlfCIL
OCTOBER 20, 1911
7:15 P.ll.
1. C.ll to order, invocation, pledcJe of allegiance, and roll call.
2. To conaider an ordinance on final r.actinv fixing the tax levy
in aill8 upon -ch dollar of the ........ valuation of all
taxable property within the City of EIMJlevoocl, Colorado, and
.. tabliab!DIJ a aill levy for the EIMJlevoocl, Colorado, Down-
town DeYelos-ent Authority. /
~.3;
~1 ,0
3 • Adjourn.ent.
~4;t-
Peter B. v
Act!DIJ City r
PBV/ab
•
I . .
•
CIID!lWCE !«). 0 I
SFlUES CF 1988--
•
• •
CCXH:IL BILL 00. 34
IN'I'KI:U.::ED BY CCXH:IL
~ HABENIOIT
AN CIIDINNCE FIXI!«; '!'HE TAX lEVY m tm..LS UPCN E1V:H IXI..T.AR CF '!'HE ASSESSED
Vi\LUM'ICW CF N..L 'n\XMU: J?RCI>DttY WI'l'HIN 'l'HE CI'IY CF ~I <XLCJWx) I AW
ES'l'AEILISHIK; A HilL lEVY PCR THE f:'G.!llXD, CXLCIWX>, IXJoNl'CiofJ OE'JEL<PHI'Nr AlmDU'IY.
~Hm:AS, it is the dlty of the City Council of the City of ~lewood,
Colorack>, under the EnglE!\«JQd fblle Rule Olarter a."ld Colorad:> Revised Statutes,
to make the iSMual levy for City purposes; and
~. the City Council has &lly cx:nsidered the estimated valuation of
all the taxable prcp!rty wi.t.tti.n the City and the needs of the City o f each of
said levies and has detenni.ned that the levies as hereinafter set forth, are
prq>er and wise;
101 I ~I BE IT <Pno\INID BY 'lHE CI'IY <D.H:IL CF 'lHE CI'IY CF ~. ~. AS I"CLL<Jt5:
Section 1. 'nlat there be and hereby is levied for the year 1988, due
and payable as required by statutes in the year 1989, a tax of 5.419 mills on
the ctlllar for the General Fund of the City of ~lewood, Color.OO, and 1.802
Mills on the dollar for the Debt Servi.oe Fund of the City of fl'lglewood, --Color.OO.
'l!lat the 1~ hereinabove set forth shall be levied l.p:ln each dollar of
the assessed valuation of all taxable prqlerty within the cmporate limits of
tl-.e City of Englewood, Colorack>, and the said levy shall be certified as
required by lsw .
Section 2 . '!hat under the authority of the Colorado Revised Statutes
and t.~ fl'lglewood Home Rule Charter, there is hereby levied for the year 1988,
due and payable as required by law in 1989, a tax of bill. mills on the IX!llar
for the use and benefit of the fl'lglewood, Colorado, Dol.fJtown DeYelopEnt
Authori y.
'lha the levy hereinabove set forth shall be levied l.p:ln each dollar of
the valuation of all taxabl!! ptq:Jerty within the fl'lglewood, Colorado,
town De\: loprent District, and the said levy shall be certified as irod by law.
Intl':cduc::ed , read in full, and passed on firs readi.ng' on the 3rd day of nr-t-nv•r, 19 8.
-1 -
•
I . •
I
•
•
• -
Publis.'led as a Bill for an Ordinance oo the 5th day of O::tcber, 1988.
Read and ane:uded on second readi.nq the lith day of O::tcber, 1988.
Published in full as al1ended oo the Uth day of October, 1988.
Read by ti t.le and passed oo final ~ oo the 20th day of October, 1988.
P\l:llished by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1988, on the 26th
day of 0cto1:e:r, lMS. --
Attest: Susan Van Dyke, Mayor
Patri.c:ia H. Crtw, city Clerlt
I, Patricia H. crow, City Clerlt foe the City of ~lewood, COloract>,
hereby certify the abc:Jve and fcregoinq u • true copy of the Ordinance passed
oo final readinq and pdllish@d by title as Ordinance r~. __ , Series of 1988.
Patricia H. crow
-2 -
I . .
•
•
•
• •
1 &1Pt.. 11./Sf-.m .f /8 . ~d ~,_
~!-!'-K-1 ~IUr
•
f11!c' y j / 8-
'ul CL t.e_
A&Dm ITDI __ _
PI£SEJIT£D IY -----
/
n•: -..L..:..:~~:::!..!:::2-~......Z.---..:::::::!t!~-#:z=._~:l~v_
----., /' a£;-· / -/
J.;/ ~ ~ .
•
I . •
•
•
• -
Special Session
October 20, 1-
1. The speci1l -.ting of the Engl...ood City Council w1s c&lled to order by
Mlyor Y1n Dyke 1t 7:30 P·•· Roll w1s c1lled.
Present: Council Me.bers H&thlw&y, Kolt&y, Koz&cek, Byrne ,
HAbenicht, Cl1yton, Y1n Dyke
Absent: None
A quoru. w1s present.
Also present: Acting City Nln~ger W&ggoner
City Attorney DeWitt
City Clerk c,.._
Director Rlgl1nd, Engineering Services
Office Engineer Kit., Engineering Services
2. Mayor Y1n Dyke IMOUIICed thlt the purpose of the speci1l -.ting w1s to
consider the cre1tion of P&ving District Mo. 33.
auiCJL ._. 1t1UaX MIED, auEJL ._. ULTAY Sfia.ED, TO OPBI TIE
,.._IC 11011• TO C:.SIDD TIE CIOTI. Of M¥1. DISTIICT •• ll.
Ayes: Council Nellbers Kolhy, HlthiWiy, Koucek, Byrne ,
lllys:
HAbenicht, Cl1yton, Vln Dyke
None
Abstlin: None
Absent: None
Mot i on c1rried.
Acting City Man~ger Waggc~Mr uphined th1t stiff ..ould present detAiled n-
foi"'UtiOfl concerning the P1ving District fn 1n effort to 1ns r in 1dnnce
uny of the c011cerns 1nd questiCMis of the audience .
Director R~gllnd , duly SliOrn, g1ve 1 brief history of the City 's pnfng dis -
tr i ct progrM , .tlich w1s developed n 1956 to c011strvct or rec011strvct 1ll
streets in the City not -.tfng est1bl tshed st1ncl1nb . Thue h1ve been 27
Districts since 1956, lnd tll of the City 's streets hne been included in
those districts . The ten ·yelr progr• as developed in 1913 for the purpose
of cc,..,letfng COflstrvctiCMI or retCMistrvctiCMI of 1ll ,...infnt streets in the
Ci ty . Three ye1rs of the ten -ye1r plan h1ve been cc,..,leted; P1vtng District
No . 33 is ye1r four of the pl1n. CCMistructiCMI of P1ving District No. 33 will
not ca.ence until 1989, usess.nts w 11 not be deterwfned untfl 1990 .
Ms . R1gl1ncl expl1fned th1t the purpose of this public he1rfng w1s to deterwfne
th publi c's sentf-.nts . After t Iring , Council 111y delete streets fc h
•
I . •
•
•
•
.. -
Engle.ood City Council
October 20, 1988, Public Hearing -Paving District llo. 33, Page 2
hne been proposed. Esti .. ted costs wre explAined as follows: Assesuble
costs are esti .. ted to be $893,850 and include certain construction costs,
bond, legal and fiscal fees, bond interest, and a Zl contingency fee to offset
collection costs and delinquencies; the costs to the City are esti .. ted to be
$469,350 and includes construction costs for street and alley intersections,
all ston1 sewr related iiiProve.nts, engineering, surveying, and inspection
costs, and any costs associated with printing, .. iling, transportation and
other •iscellaneous costs, such as tree re.oval and replace.ent; total
$1,363,200. The tree rephce.nt progr• and the assess.ent process wre ex -
plained. Standards for concrete work for sidewalks, curbs and gutters, widths
for streets, and style of curbwalks wre ~~entioned.
Office Engineer KaM , duly sworn, stated he will be the project engineer for
Paving District llo. 33, and would be involved in the coordination of the
design, overseeing the acquisition of rights-of-way/ease.ents, phns and
specifications for the project, unagaent of the construction during 1989,
and preparation of the final asseswent roll in 1990. Mr . KaM offered to
.eet with any of the property owners who •ight have questions or concerns. He
wnt over in detail the handout et~titled "Propo sed Pning District Mo . 33",
specifying the streets which are to be involved i n the proposed district, the
schedule as proposed, the various typical paving sections as wll as alternate
pave.ent sections . Costs for the various assess.ents wre defined and
explAined.
Nayor Van Dyte expllined that it was Council's intet~t to take into consider-
at ton all c.-nts by those present COftCerning the creation of Paving District
llo . 33, and she set the fo,.. for receiving public c.-nts, stating those
c.-nts will be ude on a street-by -street basis . All witnesses wre duly
sworn prior to presenting ca..ents.
1800 -1900 W. Iaker Ave. -Construct 40 '-wide paving (8 l 3), install Type •a•
Industrial on north and south sides .
S.U.l "· Va,...n, Vardeun l Solis Junk Yards, 1915 W. Baker Ave . -
stated these assess.nts would be unjust and unfair to taxpayers . He
questioned what happens to tax _...y paid by the citizens. He felt paving
caused pollution tlltlich would affect waterways . He questioned the a•unt
of property for street right -of-way , s tat ing they had donated property
already for the ins tallation of streets, s.ett• in the 1960s. He felt
the dirt street had sufficed all these years and did not feel it was
necessary to change. Council ....,_r Clayton inquired if he was of the
opinion that 1800 -1900 W. Baker Ave . should be re.oved fro. the pav i ng
district . Mr . Vardelun stated for hitielf, yes. He confinled that he was
speaking only for the 1900 block . Discussion followd regarding selection
of contractors, why the City does not use tax •ney to construct the
streets, and the high level of taxes.
Guy Sandritter , 1835 W. Baker Ave . • expressed concern about cost, but
stated he was in favor of the paving district as Iaker Ave . is quite
naM"OW and when i t rains, erost011 creates a Pf'Obl•. He also c.-nted
that trying to ruft a business at thlt loCitiOII was a probl•, as •st
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
Engl~ City Council
October 20. 1988. Public IIHring -hving District llo. 33. Page 3
people as$'-e the street is an alley since it's not paved. He confir.ed
he had 125 feet of front footage.
2000-2100 W. Baltic Place -Construct 32 '-wide paving (6 I 2), install CWII on
north and south sides. Relocate poles to north side of street.
llorvin Larson, 2020 W. Warren/2033 W. Baltic Pl. -strongly opposed the
asses~t. stating taxes were already too high and that the property was
already assessed for .,re than it could be sold for. He was concerned,
since .,st of the lots were vacant, that when they were sold and developed
the street would have to be torn up to access utilities. He COIIPlained
that in the past Councils have not gone along with the taxpayer, but have
sided with the Engineering Depart.ettt. He inforwed Council that the City
had taken 6• of his property when Tejon was widened and he resented having
to pa,y for the street construction. Council Nellber HathM~ay assured Mr.
Larson thd his concerns would be considered. She inforwed Mr. larson
that she knew fn. her own experience that it was possible to h.ve
deferred or deleted certain streets fn. paving districts. She also
advised hi• that 80S of the proposed paving district lies within Council
District I which she represents; if enough public opinion is expressed in
opposition to a particular street, she would follow through on that
position. Further discussion ensued.
Pat fkhoney, 2000 W. Warren Av. -spoke in favor of Baltic Ave . being
paved based 011 the fact that the property in the area is building up and
uny -.11 child"" ..., Hve in the neighborltood. He stated that one
reason ~ of the lots ,..in vacut with bad erosion is because there is
no way to ct..nel the draiuge . He did question the installation of
•Holl1"00d curtts• Md would prefer 6• curbs and a 4 ' sidewalk. He
requested that this be considered. Further discussion followd concerning
costs, labor, dratuge. curb cuts for driveways if vertical curbs are
installed. It was c011firwed that vertical curb and gutter would be
acceptable tf the rest of the property owners agreed . Director Ragland
pointed out for tftt"JJM's info,...tion that the utility poles which are
currently ._ the •iddle of Baltic would be .oved to the north side of
the r tgllt-of-way , keeping the poles within the right-of-way of the street;
further that electrical and telephone services to the houses would be
overhead .
3500 S. Bannock St. -CCMtstruct 32 '-wide paving (6 I 2), ,...,,e and replace
existing vertical curb I gutter with 5 ' walk on east I west sides u
necessary .
Mike Cooper, 3597 S. Bannock St. -questioned the width of sidewalks and
suggested that 4 ' width be installed instead of 5'. It was explained to
Mr. Cooper that tn order to uintain uniforwity with what is already in
his block, 5' sidewalks would be installed. He also questioned why the
asphalt could not be resealed. Mr . Ita• explained the probl•s which
exist wfth the high C"*ll, whid1 will be elt•tnated wtth excavating the
street to a lower level, lowering the gas and water 1 ines (those costs to
be absorbed by Publtc Service and the Water Depart.nt). Nr . Cooper asked
if the assess-..t costs inchlded tree re.oval. r,... ,._,,.1 and
•
I . •
-
•
•
• -
Engle.ood City Council
October ZO, 1988, Public Hearing -Paving District No. 33, Page 4
rephce.ent wre discussed. Mr. Cooper info.-.d Council th~t he would
like to see the reconstruction of ~nnock put off due to the poor econ011y.
Council Mellber tqthawl} pointed out that plans for ~nnock St. are that it
will re.ain a one-wl} street. It was clarified that the width of ~nnock
will be 30'.
Colleen Burke, 3594 S. ~nnock St. -questioned the percentage being
charged now as c0111pued to what was charged in 1956. Ns . Ragland and Mr.
Kat. explained that the percentage being paid by the '"--ner today is
less than in the early years of the paving progr•. Up until 1982 the
ho.ecMters paid for all the cost of work done in front of their property,
paid for all the bond costs and interest, and the ZS contingency, and in
addition they also paid for the engineering costs, all •iscellaneous costs
associated with construction -about 15 or 20S mre than the current
assesst~ents include. Ns. Burke pointed out that this construction h~d
been delayed for about a year due to the econ_, and she did not feel the
ec~ had iiiiProved . She inquired how it was decided what needed to be
replaced; she did not understand the urkings. The standards for concrete
rephce.ent and the urkings wre exphined, and Ns. Burke was invited to
contact ""· Kat. to discuss this further. Ns. Burke objected to re110val
of the trees . It was explained that the !I.e CMter has the option of not
,_ving the trees, but the !I.e CMter would have to accept future
responsibility for t~.
Vickie Russ, representing leo Huh, 3560 S. laMOCk St. -explained that
her uncle, ""· Huh, CMM!d four lots (105' frontage), but was retired and
on a li•ited tncc.e. This asseswent would be a hardship even if spread
over the allowed 10-year period. The special deferral for assesS~~ents for
certain !I.e o.ners was explained.
Terry Schaff, 3590 S. Bannock -asked cOftCerning width of driveway cuts
and he was infor.ed that the current drt...., wtdth probably dtd not ... t
the City 's standards . He also questiOMd the advisability of ....,ving and
replacing sc.e of the COftCrete blocks .-... the adjacent blocks wre okay.
He stated thts action sc.ett .. s causes the good blocks to becc.e d..aged.
He -.ntiOMCI the ,..,.ving of fox in a previous district which has caused
probl.-s for his dri y at that location. He didn 't think a 1/4•
difference warranted replac t . He was tssured that Engineering would
work with ht• cOftCern ng this . "". Schaff also expressed cOftCern about
industrial traffic and d-.ge to the st-..allt . It was explained that
after the street has bee reconstructed to standards, it becc.es the
responsibility of the Ci ty to utntain; ~ver, concrete work (sidewalk ,
curb, gutter) reaain the responsibility of the '"--ner.
Bill Batt representing 1......,.1 lutheran Church, 3695 S. Acou St . -
stated the Church couldn 't afford the assess.ents for the property it owns
at 3600 South laMock and st lerlyon, also 3700 South ~nnock . He
presented 1 petition tn opposition to the paving of ~nnoclt which had been
•
I . •
•
•
• -
Englewood City Council
October 20, 1188, Public Hearing -Paving District Mo. 33, Page 5
signed by ..-bers of l..anuel Lutheran Church. On behalf of the
congregation, he requested that the work be delayed. Ms . Ragland
explained that if the asseswent wasn 't paid, it would be considered &
lien upon the property. At Mayor Van Dyke 's request, ..-bers of the
Church who were in attendance stood up . The various pieces of property
owned by the Church were identified. Mr. B&tt explained the Church 's
financial predic.ent , and requested that Council t&ke that predicuent
into consideration.
~rk Wolf, Ch&inun of the Board of Trustees, I..anuel Lutheran Church,
3695 S. Ac~ St. -concurred with st&te.ents -.de by Mr. B&tt, and felt
it placed &n undue hardship upon the Church with both Kenyon and Bannock
being in the District. He added that he felt this work could be put off
for &while.
3700 S. Bannock St. -Construct 32 '-wide paving (6 l 2), rMOve and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter with 5 '-w&lk on east and west sides as
necessary.
Dorothy Willia.s, 3766 S. Bannock St. -questioned why the curbs need to
be raoved, stating she has replaced the sidewalk in front of her h011e
three different ti.es in the past 14 years. She has been told that the
probla is due to ground swelling, not tree roots. She objected to having
trees raoved when they were not the cause of the d.age. She felt this
additional tax is unwuranted &nd would create a hardship for her . ~yor
Van Dyke requested Mr . Ka~ to reevaluate her sidewalks.
Joyce and Pfltl bgas, 3764 S. laMOCk St . -both spoke in opposition to
the paving district, and prese~~ted the following issues: I) high increase
in property taxes (over lSOI within the past year), and why isn't there
mney to fix the streets?; 2) And considering the general city budget of
total Englewood, especially the industrial areas, such as the Denver Tech
Center, why do those c-..anies not share the cost instead of assessing the
property owners? COUftCtl .._.,.r Hathaway explained that the Denver Tech
Center is not within the city ltaits of Englewood along with & lot of
other industrial areas which aay have an Englewood aailing address. She
further coa.ented and rainded Mr . and Mrs. Regas that 9a of the streets
within the City of Englewood have been included in prior paving districts .
Concerning the property tax, Council r Hath-.y explained that a very
saall ..aunt of the property tax is ntturned to Englewood, the rest is
absorbed and used by the County, School District, and other special
districts. Mrs . Regas questioned why the costs for the paving district
went not budgeted in the general budget. Mr. WlggOMr explained that the
City's portion of t iaprov .. nts wnt budgeted. Mr . Regas e)(pressed
concern about how parking would be aanaged during t construction period,
and was assured that the project would be done in phases and it was hoped
that the neighborftood would not be inconvenienced for aore than two to
four hours; also that .. rgency access would be aaintatned. Mr . Regas
also questioned y the driveways whi ch exist are aarked to be reaoved.
He also felt the si alks re oltay. He obj ted to the •thod of
aarking the sld alks. Ms . Ragland responded that the are& had been
aarked so that the res dents would be nforaed of t cost apl cation of
I . •
•
•
• •
Englewood City Council
October 20. 1988. Public Hearing -Paving District No. 33. Page 6
the i~rov~nts prior to the public hearing. This was also done so that
the owners of the property could aake any provisions they deewed necessary
(hire their own contractor with possible savings in costs) over the next
two years. She info~ the Regas she would be happy to have so.eone fro.
the Engineering Depart.ent discuss the aatter with thet1. Regarding the
drivew~J, Ms. Ragland explained that if the drivewtY is not 1 "dust free
surface" the apron between the sidewalk and curb and gutter .ust be filled
in with concrete. Mr. Regu stated he disagreed with the 11ethod of
aarking the concrete and suggested it would be .,re appropriate to work
with the property owner individually, exphining what wu wrong and why
certain sections •st be replaced. Ms. Ragland exphined there were 33
blocks within this paving district, and there was not sufficient ti11e to
COIIPlY with this suggestion. Mrs. Regas inquired about the standards and
stated that there was very little variance (less than 1/4") between any of
their sidewalk blocks. Ms. Ragland explained that, for consistency, only
one person did the aarkings and that person, bued on 17 years of
experience, had lllde the decisions. She offered to have the aarkings
reviewed by staff. Mr. Regas pointed out that it would be difficult to
get bids during the winter .unths, and co.plained that adequate ti11e was
not allocated for owners to get a private contractor and suggested this
ti11e be extended. It was explained to hi•, that the calendar listed only
deadlines and that the work could be done anyti .. before those deadlines.
It was confi~ for Mrs. Regas that this district did not affect
alleyways and that it was estiaated that four hours should be the aaxi.u.
for the citizens to be without water and gas.
Mrs. Wtllia.s, previously swon~ above, c~ted f,.. the audience
concen~ing digging up the streets after they have been paved to work on
water aftd gas liMs. It was uplained that this is ""•t the City is
trying to avoid by doing the utility work prior to the paving.
Genevieve Tressler, 3769 S. Bannock St. -wanted to know how they could
request that their block be take~~ out of the District. She wu info~
that It would be necessary to get the other property owners to sign a
petition or speak up In s.-wa.y. M.,or Van Dyke exphined that the
street could be raoved fro. this District, but it would have to be put
back Into a District in the future to ~t the criteria established for
the City. It wu further pointed out that the aaxt-tt .. it could be
defer.-.cl would be st• years. "s . Tressler stated she did not feel the
work was necessary at thi s tt ...
Darell Lakin, 3733 S. Bannock St . -Inquired If the cost of lowering the
hu.p is to be assessed to the owners ; he wa Info~ that It wasn 't . He
also wondered ""Y "Hollywood" curbs •re being installed, and he wu
tnfo.-.d that wasn 't the case on Bannock, only on newly constructed
streets . Mr . Lakin was of the opinion 1 thin coat of oil would be
sufficient. Mrs . Ragland e•phined the core SIIIPles taken fr• the street
indicate there is not sufficient base beneath the asphalt, the asphalt is
thin, and structurally the street does not .. t the standards . Mr . lakin
c-..nted that the street was no longer 1 "busy street• and asked wt\y
parking couldn 't be perw tted on both sides. Thfs wu discussed and
••phined .
I • •
•
•
•
.. -
Englewood City Council
October 20, 1988, Public Hearing -Paving District No. 33, Page 7
Doug and Crystal Ol•stead, 3715 and 3715-1/2 S. Bannock St. -were of the
opinion that the street was not in bad shape, that it would cost too much
to do it now, and suggested we wait until it needs it. They were
concerned the City was taking steps to open Bannock to two-way traffic.
And they pointed out that if the potentia 1 exists for it to be made
two-way traffic, we should wait until that time to reconstruct the street
and do the concrete work. Council Member Kozacek interjected that the
Highway Department will not allow Bannock to become a two-way street
because of the islands, etc., constructed on US285. Mr. Ol•stead
suggested that Bannock Street should be reevaluated to see if the
construction is actually needed or if less expensive repair work would
suffice. Ms. Ragland explained that the longer the street is delayed, the
more expense the City incurs for maintenance and the more of a hazard it
becomes for drivers. To add an overlay increases the problem with the
high crown, and would not meet the City 's standards. Mrs. Ol•stead
inquired about when the current road was built and was infol"'led that
Bannock had not been included in any paving district since 1956, records
prior to that are sketchy. Mrs. Ol•stead was of the opinion that it
should be the City's responsibility to maintain the road. Mr. Ol•stead
agreed, stating that it appeared as if the City was trying to avoid its
responsibilities in the maintenance of Bannock. Ms . Ragland responded
that the street does not meet the City's standards of all other streets
which have been in paving districts since 1956, in terms of base, asphalt
and crown section.
Dorothy Willi.-s, who was previously sworn, made additional c~nts
concerning the condition of Kenyon as opposed to Bannock. She did not
feel that Bannock should be reconstructed at this time, as the street
isn't that bad . She i~lied the only reason for the paving district was
to provide work for contractors.
3800 S. Bannock St. -Construct 32 '-wide paving (6 l 2, raove and replace
existing vertical curb and gutter with 5 ' -walk on east and west sides IS
necessary .
Elizabeth Granger, 3819 S. Bannock St. -asked about the three large el•s
tn front of her hOM which are scheduled to be raoved. She wondered
re they could be replaced. Mr . Kahil explained that the trees would be
replaced w th an equal nUIIber of t,...s with replac-nt stock in 1-112• to z• s ze . planted professionally, and the owner has the option of putting
t blc i n the par ing area or any place in the front yard. Ms . Granger
wa s assured that the City would still remove the trees even if she hired a
pr vate contractor to do the concrete work . It was pointed out that there
were certain distance restrictions for trees to be planted f~ the
concrete, also a standard for how close the trees can be planted to each
other . Ms. Ragland pointed out that the t,... ...oval would have to be
coordInated with the concrete work if done by a private contractor. Ms .
Granger wu advised that the savings she could realize by having the
concrete done by a private contractor could approximate 20 -251 . I • •
•
•
• •
Englewood City Council
October 20, 1988, Public Hearing -Paving District No. 33, Page 8
3900 S. B1nnock St. -Construct 32'-wide p1ving (6 l 2), re110ve and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter with 5'walk on east and west sides as
necess•ry.
No one appeared.
4000 S. Bannock St. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 l 2), ret10ve and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter with 5' -walk on east and west sides as necesury.
Arlene Erickson, 4097 S. Bannock St. -stated her support of the request
of I ... nuel lutheran Church. She further stated that she felt that
B1nnock was in good condition and reconstruction could be deferred for
awhile. She pointed out that there isn't .uch traffic on B1nnock, .ostly
local tnffic.
1800-1900 W. Caspian Pl1ce -Construct 40 '-wide paving (8 l 3), install Type •a• Industrial on south side; install Type •a• Industrial where not existing
on north side.
Alan Huggins representing Merrill Engineering, 2390 S. Tejon, for property
bordered by Caspian, Tejon, Raritan, and Wesley -explained that Mrs.
Nerr ill was out of to.n, and he i nqu i red i f "'"s . Nerr i 11 cou 1 d send a
letter to Council addressing her concems . "-yor Van Dyke repl led in the
affi,..tive. "'"· Huggins further stated that their assess.ent would be
$65,000 and that business had not been very good the last few years. Mr .
Huggins assured Council that Mrs . Merrill 's letter would be forthco.ing.
3800 S. Del ... re St. -Construct 32 '-wide paving (6 l 2); re.ove and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter with 5 '-walk on west side as necessary; re.ove
and replace existing vertical curb l gutter with 4 '-walk and install 4 '-walk
where not existing on east side .
laura BI"CMM, 3147 S. Delaware St . -presented a petition signed by all the
ha.o.ners in the 3800 block of South Delware, stating their oppos i tion
to Paving District No. 33. She explained to Council why this assess .. nt
would be a hardship for her, stating she would .uch prefer to use the
.oney for windows, landscaping. etc . She did not feel that the sidewalk
warranted repair based on the •tnute fraction of differences in th
stones . She objected to the spray paint urkfngs , stati ng i t looked
really bad . She expla i ned that the reason she had asked her neighbors to
sign the petition was bec ause she knew they were not in favor of the
Distr i ct, but that they probably wouldn 't attend the hearing to uke the i r
position known to Council. She urged Council to exclude their block fro.
the paving district. Ms . Ragland advised Council that this fs the last
block on Delaware to be tn a paving district. "-yor Van Dyke explained
that a deferral, If approved, could only be for a uxi.u. of six years.
J ... s Kelley , 3876 S . Delware St . -,...inded Council Mellbers that in
addition to the elct.rly in the 3800 block of S. Delware , there ts another
group -young f•il ies -wt.o would also find the assess.nts a hardship .
He felt .,st of th• would rather s pend .oney on the neces s ities of
•
I • •
•
•
• -
Englewood City Council
October 20, 1988, Public Hearing -Paving District No. 33, Page 9
i~roving their ha.es thAn on street repAirs. He Ad•itted thAt the street
wAsn't in the best condition, but felt it WAS livAble. He felt if it wAs
to be done, it should be done correctly (widened to •Atch the rest of
DelAware). He inquired about tax .oney being used in Arapahoe County for
street repairs, And he asked why Englewood did not have the opportunity to
use sa.e of those funds for its repairs. Mr. Waggoner Advised Mr . Kelley
that Arapahoe County wi 11 not ca.e into Englewood to pave streets. The
Apport io.ent of .antes received fro. AnpAhoe County for the Road and
Bridge Fund was explained. Mr. Kelley further stated he felt his
neighborhood had been vandalized as a result of the spray paint.
Audrey l. Scott, 3855 S. Delaware St. -tran~itted to Council copies of a
written stat..ent which she read into the record of the .eating. She WAS
strongly opposed to the creation of Paving District No . 33.
• • • • •
City Clerk's Note: During Ms. Scott's testi.ony, MAyor Van Dyke wAs absent
fro. the .eating fro. 10:06 P·•· to 10:12 p.• .
• • • • •
MAry Trouth, 3868 S. Delaware St. -stated she realized that eventually
she would be required to put in a sidewalk. She inquired About lowering
the crown and replac-nt of the utility lines. Based on her experience
in this type of construction work, she was of the opinion that this work
should not be done tn the spring and felt it should be done in the s-r
.onths. She also stated that a seal coat would be sufficient and that
Delaware does not have to be reconstructed . She quest toned what a •Prt•
Coat• was, and it was explained that a pri .. coat is applied on top of the
base coat only when there is a delay tn lf)l)lytng the asphalt on top of the
base coat, thAt the pri .. coat holds the base coat tn place until the
asphalt can be applied. It was conftrwed that the width of the sidewalk
on the east stde of Delaware would be 4 '. She concluded, stating the
street was not tn bad shape, that a seal coat would be appropriate .
3400 S. E .. rson St. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 & Z), install CWII on east
side. Install curt.alk II where not existing on we st side. Re.ave and
replace existing curbwalk II where necessary on west side.
Cliff Johnson representing Swedish Medical Center, SOl E. Hupden Ave . -
advised Council that the hospital C*Md about 901 of the 3400 block of
South E .. rson , and infor.ed Council that Swedish would like to have this
block deferred for about a year, possibly two. He stated it wa s Swedish 's
intention to eventually close the street. He was unable to predict
exactly when the street would be closed since Swedish would have to own
1001 of the property to take the street over and close it to traffic . It
was explained to Mr . Johnson that Swedish's request would be considered.
City Clerk Crow ldvised Council that a letter fro. s.edish Medical Center,
stating their position, hid been received and would be entered Into the
official record of the hearing and that Council will receive a copy .
•
•
I . •
-
• •
•
•
•
,. •
Englewood City Council
October 20, 1188, Public Hearing -Paving District Mo. 33, Page 10
2900 S. Galipago St. -Construct 30'-wide paving (8 l 3), install Type "B"
Industrial on east side. Install vertical curb and gutter on west side.
No one appeared.
2000-2300 W. Hillside Ave. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 l 2), instill
CurbWalk II on north and south sides where not existing. Relocate poles to
back lot line ease.ents.
Trent Meininger, 2332 and 2334 W. Hillside Ave. -stated he was in favor
of i~roving Hillside, that it was a very dangerous street with the power
poles in the •iddle of the street. He c~nted that he had already paid
for the i~rove.ents (through develo~nt escrow] and felt the City should
go ahead with the i~rove.ents.
Dean Reid, 2024 W. Harvard Ave. and 2000 W. Harvard Ave. -stated this
asseswent would be a hardship, having already paid assess•nts for
Harvard and Tejon. He CCIIIPlained about c~rcial parking on his street,
and stated he will not dedicate his land for Hillside. He objected to the
construction and paving of the street as he prefers open space which is
one reason why he bought the land. He questioned whether sewer or water
lines would be an added expense. Ms . Ragland explained that water and
sewer lines will be installed by the Utilities Depart.ent, and further, if
there is no building there now, sewer taps will be ude to the side of the
road and when developed, tap fees, installation, and other pro rated costs
would have to be paid; there would be no i.ediate cost assessed to Mr .
Reid. He advised Council that he wuld incur additional expenses due to
this construction such as fences, utility poles, etc. Ms. Ragland
revl..ed the proposal for Hillside Avenue to relocate the utility poles to
the back lot 1 ine eas.-nt, the eas....t on the property that would face
Hillside Ave~~ue; the City would pick up the costs of relocation and
negotiate with Public s.tvlce tc.pany for reducing that cost. Therefore,
that cost has not beet! Included as a part of the asseswent to the
property CMMtr. Howver, Ms. RaglMCI elqllained this proposal would
require COUM:tl's approval. •· Reid CCIIIPlained about a •bad• section of
Harvard Ave~~ue, about the pot holes on Tejon Street. He felt the City dtd
a very poor job of •intainint the streets which had been tn previous
paving districts. He didn't want to ,..ve his fence, and felt that if
the area is opened up it would cause increased crt• tn his area . He
suggested the City adotlt •a freez • and that the •creat he graff itt • be
cleaned up and ,..ved.
Rodney Hansen, 2288 W. Hillside Ave. -stated he would be delighted to s
the street put in and he felt it would be safer for the chtldre~~. He felt
it would help police and ftre protection for their area. Transportation
is a probl• as the School District refuses to provide tha the s ..
services given to the rest of Englewood's citizens. He stressed that
presently it Is not a safe situation, and stated he had no objection to
any of the assess .. nts involved in the proposed paving district.
Ross Henderson, CMMtr of three Ufltts on Hillside Ave. -stated he had
dedicated his property baclt tn ltll and had been under the i~resston t
•
I . •
•
•
•
,. •
Englewood City Council October 20, 1988, Public Hearing -Paving District No. 33, Page 11
street would be built shortly after that. However, since it wasn't, he
felt the property values had decreased in those five years. He felt it
was ti.e to get on with the paving district. He confir.ed that he still
owned the units and did not object to any of the assess.ents.
000 W. Jefferson Ave. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 l 2), re10ve and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter with 5'-walk on north and south sides as
necessary. Extra paving width on west end of block to be paid for by City.
and
000 W. Kenyon Ave. -Construct 32' -wide paving (6 l 2), re10ve and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter with 4' -walk on north and south sides as
necessary.
Pat Shank, 3606 S. AcOM St., CMter of tri-plex on Kenyon and AcOM -
stated she had been in four previous paving districts, and that this
district would affect her on both AcOM and Kenyon. She advised Council
that she had continually cOIIPlained about the 11-wheelers on Kenyon, and c~ted that traffic had increased on Kenyon even though Kenyon had been
blocked off at Santa Fe. She felt she had done her share of paving
Englwood streets. Council .....,_r Kozacek inforwed Its. Shank that Council
had objected to the closure of Kenyon, that it was closed at the request
of Sheridan . He also explained that others had beeft affected by n.-rous
paving districts and/or na.erous streets in one paving district, however,
he understood her concern. She further advised Council about the da.age
done b,r trucks on Jefferson durt, the construction of the Overseas
Chrhttan Servic-"'s Center. She elt theJ should share the expense of
repairtng it.
100 W. Ken~ Ave . -construct lZ ' -wtde pavt .. (6 l Z), ...ave and replace
existing vi ical curb l gutter wtth 4'-walk on north and south stdes as
necessary.
No one appeared.
construct lZ ' -wtde pavt.. (i l Z), ...ave and replace
curb l gutter wtth 4' -walk on south side as
No one appeared.
100 E. Ken Ave . -Construct lZ ' -wtde pavtng (6 l Z), ,_ve and ret> lace
ex s , ve ca curb l gutt r wtth 9 ' -walk on north s de as necessary.
Reeove ...,lace extsttng verttcal curb l gutter wtth 4 '-walk on south stde as
necessary.
No one appeared.
•
'
I . •
•
•
•
• •
Englewood City Council
October 20, 1988, Public Hearing -Paving District No. 33, Page 12
3600 S. Lincoln St. -Construct 32' -wide paving (6 & 2), re110ve and replace
existing vertical curb and gutter with walk (walk width varies) on east and
west sides as necessary. Install 4'-walk on cul-de-sac where not existing.
No one appeared.
3700 S. Lincoln St. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 & 2), re110ve and replace
existing vertical curb & gutter with 5'-walk on east and west sides as
necessary.
David Miller, 3700 S. Lincoln St. -requested that Paving District 33 be
disbanded, based on the consensus of the people addressing Council at the
hearing as .,st of the people at the hearing said they couldn't afford
these i11prove~~ents and didn't think the i11prove~~ents were needed. He
c~nted upon the unner in which the spray paint urltings were ude. He
co.plained about the unner and quality of work which had been done in a
previous paving district about four years ago on Kenyon. He stated that
instead of repairing and uintaining the streets as it should, the City
had adopted a plan to ulte the citizens pay for it. He suggested that
when the paving district progr .. was adopted uybe it was a good idea, but
not now. With the econa.y what it is, the people don't want these
t11prove~~ents and can't afford tha. He further suggested that the City
take the ~Y it would spend on its share of this district and use that
110ney to repair the streets, do .,re street sweeping, provide better
snow/tee re.oval. He felt the citizens were overtaxed on all levels, and
urged all govern.ents to find ways to reduce expenditures, not continue to
spend .oney. He dtd not feel these t~~prov-..ts would enhance his
property, and that the street was in good condition tf the City dtd tts
part of •intaining tt. Council .....,.r Kozacek tnforwed Mr. Miller that
considerable effort had bHft !lade by this Council to cut expenses and the
budget has bHft decreased over the past three years. He also advtsed Nr.
Milfer that a new draining syste.s ts being installed to alleviate .,st of
the tee proble.s on Kenyon. Mr. Miller concluded stating he was not
asking for extra services and he hoped Council understood the .. ssage the
people were gtvtng tha about not wanting or needing these t11prove~~ents .
He concluded with derogatory c.-nts concerning the Director of
Engineering Services and the Office Engineer .
The fact that the 3700 block of South Lincoln had bHft deferl'ed previou s ly
wa s confir.ed for Council "'-ber Koltay.
Shelly Frttz, 3762 S. Lincoln St . -was opposed , and stated she would 1 ike
to see tt deferred until the econa.y was better . She c~nted that the
street ts quite dark and requested that a Hght be installed for the
safety of the children . Mr. Waggoner responded that the City 's policy ts
that the intersections are lighted but lights are not installed at
•fd -block tn residential streets . He advised that Public Service C01pany
will install area lights for residents who request t~. "
•
I . •
•
•
• .. •
Englewood City Council
October 20, 1988, Public Hearing -Paving District No. 33, Page 13
No one appeared.
3100-3200 S. Shoshone St. -Construct 40' -wide paving (8 l 3); install Type 1 81 Industrial on east and west sides.
Bruce lowden.ilk representing the lowden.ilk fa.ily, owners of the
property at 1950 W. Dart~uth Avenue, stated their opposition. He
infon.ed Council that the fa.ily is in the process of selling the
property; any costs of i~rove.ents would have to be added to the value of
the land, and it is estiuted their assess•nt would be approxiutely
$70,000. He c.-nted that the purchaser would probably have to redo ~st
of these i~rov-nts, and it doesn't uke good sense to do this work
right now. He further c.-nted that since Shoshone ts now dead-ended at H~en, the street doesn't carry •ch traffic; and since it's already
paved, it doesn't uke •ch sense to install curb and gutter at this ti•.
Council Mellber Clayton inquired about the curb and gutter and was advised
that it was 6-112• wide, co.parable to continuous curbcut so that access
wouldn't be a probl .. for future develo~t.
Steven Mulhern, agent for the lowden.ilk property at 1950 W. Dart~uth
Avenue -advised Council of the benefits of this property, i.e., size,
zoning, access to rail service. He was of the opinion that including
Shoshone in the paving district at this ti• was detrt•ntal to the
devel.,...nt of the area and for that reason it should be exe.pted fr011 the district.
David Frost, representh19 Welbourne property on east side of Shoshone -
infon.ed Council that he agreed with Mr. Mulhern's c~ts. He also
advised Council that the assess.nts for the three large buildings owned
by Welbourne (business address 420 E. 58th Avenue) would be passed on to
the tenants as stipulated by leases with the tenants. Econo.ically, it is
not a good ti• to do these i~rov-.nts, it would be an ext,._ hardship
on those tenants . He expressed concern that if Shoshone ts kept in the
paving district it could adversely affect leases under consideration .
Clerk Crow infon.N Council of three letters of protest which had been received as follows :
Two letters fro. the lowden.tlk f•ily; one letter fr011 Paul lbourne .
All three letters re ccepted into the record of the aring; copies will be provided to Council .
Agnes Vardeaan , Var-d-.n l Son Junk Yard, 1915 st Baker • asked if Baker
is done bet TeJon and Raritan, how long the work wfll tak 7 Sh c~nttd that it is necessary to get their 2-ton trucks tn and out of th
yard ev ry day of t k . Nr . kiM advised htr that If there is ~
than one drtv ay accessible, tht drtv ays could bt done at different
tt•s or half oft drlv ay done at one tt• and half at another . This
didn 't an r r cone rn . Nlyor Van Oylt SU9f'sttd that t Eng ring
Depart nt find 1 way to solv this probl .. for s . Ya n .
•
•
I . •
•
•
• •
Englewood City Council
October 20, 1988, Public Hearing -Paving Dtstrtct No. 33, Page 14
liary Sandritter, previously st~~Urn, returned to the podi .. and shted he
owned the warehouse next door to the Varde.ans. He offered parking to the
Varde.ans, but Mrs. Varde.an was concerned about vandal is•.
1600-1700 W. Weslef Ave. -Construct 40'-wide paving (8 l 3), install Type •a•
Industrial on nort side. Construct Type •a• Industrial where not existing on south side.
No one appeared.
1800-1100 W. Wes~ Ave. -Construct 40'-wide paving (8 l 3), install Type •a• lndustrta1 on nort illd south sides.
No one appeared.
There wre no further witnesses wishing to testify.
CGIIICIL ._. DDCa _,., CIIIICIL ._. MTIIMIIY sua.a, TO CLOSE THE ..... c NEAll •.
Ayes:
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent:
Notion carried.
3. Mj~
Council .._.rs Kolta,y, Hathawa,y,
Habefticht, ClaytOft, Van Dyke ...... ...... ......
Kozacek, Byrne
CIIIICIL _. IATAY ... ll ..,MBJ. TM .. ttng MJourned at 11:10 p.11.
I . .
•
•
• •
AGENDA FOR THE
PUBLIC HEARING OF
'riiB DGLBWOOD CITY COOlfCIL
OCTOBER 20, 1988
7:30 P.M.
1. Call to order, invocation, pled9e of all~iance and roll
call.
2. Public Bearin;.
(a) To conaider the creation of Pavi"9 Di•trict No. 33.
3. Adj~t.
'I /
• ...c.-4,.·~-t-.---
Peter a. ••
Acti"9 Ci 11anaver
PKV/U
8_ (/!'nf JJ, s 1 V t~ f
No ~3 o (.eta I
.[I I .f r' I i+t'J
0 cc 'I'd.. .
p -t I 10)1!, I It'~
+ Pv. b f·C. f../to(J.'('I. t
Pc
•
I . •
•
•
,. •
PROPOSED
PAVING DISTRICT
N0.33
PUBLIC HEARING •
OCTOBER 20, I 988
•
I . .
•
/10
Li8tl31t
•
• •
PAVXMG DISTRICT MO. 33
LIST OF STREETS
2000-2100 w. Baltic Place
3500-~S. Bannock Street
3100 s. Delaware St.
3400 s. z.eraon st.
2000-2300 w. Bill•ide Ave.
000 w. Jefferson Ave.
000-100 w. K*ynon Ave.
000-100 E. Kenyon Ave.
3600-3100 s. Lincoln St.
1100-1900 w. Baker Ave.
1100-1900 W. Ceapian Place
1600-1900 w .... ley Avenue
3100-3200 1. aboebone St.
2100 •· aal...,o at.
I . .
• -
• •
PAVING DISTRICT NO. 33
Reconstruction
City of Englewood
........ _...,
I • I • • ' I • • I • I ..
::1 -
• •
•
• •
ABIIREVUTZD PROPOSED SamDULE P'OR PAVING DISTRICT NO. 33
'l'bur.day, October 20, 1911
Monday, •ovaber 7, 1911
Monday, •OYaber 21, 1911
Monday, April 10, 1919
Friday, Kay 12, ltlt
Monday Kay 15, ltlt
Friday, Septeaber 15, ltlt
cb/pd33
Public hearing on foraation of
Di•trict. (Special Mtg.) at
7:30 p.a.
Introduction of a bill for an
ordinance creating the
Di•trict.
Final reading of bill for
ordinance.
CUrb, gutter, •idewalk perait
cut-off date.
Final date for private concrete
con•truction.
bt. date of atart of
conatruction (120 day•).
ht. date of ca~~pletion of
project.
I . .
•
•
•
.. •
CITY OF ENGLEWOQQ
TYPICAL PAVING SECJ!QNS
~'::·
1
..
1
r ·o·
1
"' b.: .. :~·-,, kJ.----~~~~ Curbwal ·k ::··,··_._:;;;.-,.~5<;:/C•-~~-'~;f====;=-:::-..-;;r-----::~;C"--=-';:-----= .,-::~;-;-;A'_ ~ -.. 7 -.sa 4" Type II-$18. 75/F: F. •. -
6" Type II-$22. 50/F. F. _... -· .... IFP!fme
Rem. CW-$5.00/F.F.
RESIDENTIAL S I REEl
PaH8g 32'-wide 65/F.F.
Vert ic'a 1 Cu~b I Gutter
Install -$10.30/F.F.
Renove -$3.45/F.F.
,...,.._.
..... ...... Sidewalk (4' wide)
4"-thick -S9.00/F.F.
6"-thick -$11.25/F.F ARTERIAL
R~ve-$5.00/F.F.
~ 30'-wfde $24.20/F.F OR INQUSTRIAL STREET 40'-wide $32.20/F.F
5 '' ._-.-, (,. 2 f_ u......... 11 -1-) '-"~r' !"'¥~a"-'(..,_ .. ..:.:•=t'z---:.a'r~' _.._r ·:a.r --i
TYPE '8' INDUSTRIAL SJREE I
........ ..., ..................
---··----~~
§[)£WALK §ACKSLQPE
-----·-----··-'
•
r r ... ,_.
I . •
-
Asgh•lt Pning St .65;f'.f'.
Concrete Pnf ng
$48.00/F .F.
-·-
•
• •
0
ALTERNATE PAVEMENT SECTIONS
/"" ..... .,......
32' ASPHALT RESIDENTIAL STREET
---~ .... -·-
32' CONC~TE • RESIDENTIAL. STREET
SIOENTIAL 5 T •
•
• •
PAVING DISTRICT NO. 33
FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT
PAVING ONLY
32' (6&2)
.... • "" ....... IU llo '' . ..... • .....
.$93 .so 1 8 S.Q!l $1 1 165.63 $1
• ... ~ _..
~
~ •• . .
"' I "' ~ I ::. l I· I""'" .... , ",..,, -.... . ... "! I U "" ""'" i; 699 38 . . . . . .
0
2000-2100 W. Baltic Place
3500-4000 S. Bannock St.
3800 S. Delaware St.
3400 S. Emerson St.
2000-2300 W. Hillside Ave.
3600-3800 S. Linco l n St .
.. .... -~ ..
39 8 . 5
... ...
t
J!!..
al Cost 51,865.00
. .. .. ~· $532 6 .•... t ~··
II \• $266 43 ........ ..... \·llifi .43
\• $26 .~? .. . .... , . $266 43 . . ..... L4 ;]""j \• ll261i •
•
KEY
0 cos -TO
CITY ;. LARGE
~
CX.ST
OISTR I.UTEO
TH=<UiH
ZCES
•
• •
PAVING DISTRICT NO. 33
32 1 (6&2>
0
000-100 E. Kenyon Ave.
000-100 W. Kenyon Ave.
000 W. Jefferson Ave.
SKE STREET ASSESSME NT ( PAJ1NG ONLY)
50' REAR ZQ\E $333.04
ti 50' REAR ZOf'.£ $333.04 r
II)
50' REAR ZOt£ $333.04
~ l 25' COST • Sl66 .52
25' COST • $16 6.52
a
50' REAR ZONE $333.04 ~ PAliNG COST
50' FRONT ZOtE $666.07 .1ry PAIN) COST
I
ANY •••••• ·······: •
•
• •
0
PAVING DISTRICT NO. 33 2900 S. Galapago St.
FR ONT FOOT ASSESSMENT
PAVING ONLY
301 (8&3>
·" .. • .... .. ~ .... .._, ... '" . ... ,. • .. , . I""'' • fall .., ...
$1, '10. ~ $2 ,4 , 0.0( $1,512.50 Sl 815. [)0
t
. -... ... .. ~
~~~ ~
~::= -... . :v
..-;, • • • . • . . • • n
lot· : 8 i ..... -·-.......... ~ .n : \• .
C> ~ : I · ....... ....... ····· .....
fl'" • .. ,,. """ -"" -~· "' au r'" "''" ...... ...
,. S901 Sf ,. . ....... ····· ..... .. .....
~· .
-··~ 1" .... . .... ! .... '; . ,. •
U4.20/r.r •
•
•
• •
PAVING DISTRICT NO. 33
FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT
PAVING OM..Y
401 (8&3)
.. .. .... ....... IU .. ''
1. 10. SJ. 0. 2.012 .50
nz .xur .
• •
0
1800-1900 W. Baker Ave.
1800-1900 W. Caspian Place
1600-1900 W. Wesley Avenue
3100-3200 S. Shoshone St.
-" lO • ,,
•
•
•
• •
II
(
.lt01'08BD •an• DI8'1'1liC'I' .-o. 33
2) 2000-2100 w ... ltic •laoe -Coawtruct 32'-wide paving (I ' 2),
inatall CWII on north and .autb aiel... Relocate polea to north aide of atr.et.
-...~,.~~ Nt1u;-,
Q51~ ~b{~
•
I . .
• -
• •
I . .
•
•
• •
5) 3700 s. Bannock St. -Construct 32'-vide pavinq (6 '2),
re•ove and replace existinq vertical curb ' qutter V/5-valk on east and vest aides as necessary.
)!,li> d~~ h~/ .37"-G. S . .fE~Dck '!>~> Jt1-(ju. -P-(J..AU. ft.L~ J 3rfRI/ ,5 . ~~~c-e 91~> ~~ ."nG.'JS. ~c:-t!!!:..
l0'7tl/' ~~,;f~.~--3733So .).1J~c-£
/?v:, Z-) ,fQ.,.,.._,_ I e.rv ~1~7 ,s-f /S---c-i.
6) 3100 s. Bannock st. -Construct 32'-vide paving (6 ' 2,
reaove and replace existing vertical curb and vutter V/5' -walk on eaet and v.et aides aa neceeeary.
?
I . .
-
•
•
• .. •
7) 3900 s. Bannock St. -Conatruct 32'-wide pavinq (6 • 2),
r .. ove and replace exiatinq vertical curb ' qutter W/5'walk on eaat and weat aide• aa neceaaary.
I) 4000 s. Bannock st. -Conatruct 32'-wide pavincJ (I • 2),
re.ove and lreplaoe uiati.Ja9 vertical curb • vutter V/5'-valk on eaat and V88t aidea u neoeaaary.
.....
I . .
•
• •
9) 1800-1900 W. Caapian Place -Conatruct 40'-wida paving (8 '
3), inata11 Type "B" Induatrial on aouth aida; inatall Type 11 8 11 Induatrial where not exiating on north aide.
10) 3100 a. Delaware st. -Conatruct 32'-vida pavin«J (6 ' 2) 1 reJ~CWa and replace axi•tiDCJ vertical curb ' vuttar V/5 •-walk on
veat •ida u ~ 1 r_,.. and replace axiatiDCJ vertical curb
' vuttar V/ • • -walk and inatall 4 • -walk vbere not axiatiDCJ on ... t aida.
1 1tP~Aw~ 33'(/-7 So ddc~V4-u...,
~~ ~~~. .317'-J . ""t(J.-L,-4(,4-L-t..<.,., ?.,1""'7 V• ];
/)33¥) ~ '-· Sl!RI,~ 3Ks.r S .Qd~
1' ~~-> /?7~ ~I 31''-1 s , &d~
Rot.<
-I -
•
I . .
•
•
•
.. •
11) 3400 S. Emerson St.-Construct 32 1 -wida pavinq (6' 2),
install CWII on east side. Install curbwalk II whara not
axistinq on waat aida. Raaova and replace axistinq curbwalk II whara nacasaary on wast aida.
;).-,(p '7 ~~ eli#~
~1~,J
~ ,_--
12) 2100 a. Galapa9o at. -Coantruct 30'-wida paving (8' 3),
in.tall Type •a• Induatrial on aaat aida. In.tall vertical curb
and vuttar on we.t aida.
'.
I . •
•
• •
13) 2000-2300 w. Hillaide Ave. -Conatruct 32 1 -wide paving (6 '
2), in•tall CUrbwalk II on north and aouth aidea where not
exiaing. Relocate polea to back lot line eaa .. enta.
'IZJ~ ~:,.,,...,1 t:. r t-3114 ~B3s' ~OFt • ·,__, ;J332. cu . ~ ._. --1 ~~ ~ ~ /2.4c·,p(_ 01o.:~~ tU· ~~.e. .... -,v,.,.;..,. ;j~W·~(?H.~
g'3? 12~~,22tt310· ~
? .
2.2."/ ~~~ ~#tf' .a~ c:..~
•
14) ooo w. Jetfenon Ave. -eon.truct 32 1 -vide pavinv (' ' 2) ,
re.ove and replace exiatiNJ vertical curb ' vutter V/5 1 -walk on
north anct 80Uth aiclea aa neoeaaary. lhctra pavinv width on veat
end ot block to by paid tor by City.
- 7 -
I . .
•
•
• •
15) ooo w. Kenyon Ave. -Conatruct 32'-vide paving (6' 2),
r .. ove and replace exiating vertical curb 'gutter V/4'-valk on
north and aouth aidea aa neceaaary.
16) 100 w. Kenyon Ave.-Coentruct 32'-vide pavillCJ (6' 2),
re.ove and nplaoe exl.tinc, Yertloal curb ' vuttar V/4 •-walk on north and 80Utb a idee •• naoaaaary.
.. . -
I . .
•
• •
17) ooo E. Kenyon Ave. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6' 2),
reaove and replace existing vertical curb ' gutter W/7'-walk on
north aide as necessary. R .. ove and replace vertical curb '
gutter W/4'-walk on south aide as necessary.
11) 100 z. ltanyon Ave. -Construct 32'-wide pav1"9 (6 ' 2),
reaove and replace exiati"9 vertical curb 1 tutter v;t' -walk on
north aide aa neceeary. a..ove I replace axiatinq vertical curb
1 gutter V/4'-walk on eout.b aide aa neceaaary.
• I -
I . •
-
•
•
•
•
• •
19) 3600 s. Lincoln St. -Construct 32'-wide pavinq (6' 2),
r .. ove and replace existinq vertical curb and qutter w;walk (walk
width varies) on east and west sides as necessary. Install
4'-walk on cul-de-sac where not existinq.
20) 3700 a. Linooln st. -construct 32'-vide pavinv (I • 2),
re.ove and replace existinv vertical curb • vutter v/5'-valk on east and veat sides as necessary •
• "s~> ~~ ~, ~700S. J~~ S-f.
f7o? ~ 14, 37"2 So. ot-.:_-4... S-1
-10 -
I . •
•
•
•
.. •
21) 3800 S.Lincoln St.-Construct 32 1 -wide pavinq (6' 2),
reaove and replace existinq vertical curb ' qutter W/5'-walk on
eaat and weat aide• as necessary.
22)
3),
-11 -
I . .
•
I •
•
• •
23) 1600-1700 w. Wesley Ave. -Construct 40'-wide paving (8 & 3),
install Type "B" Industrial on north side. Construct Type "B"
Industrial where not existing on south aide.
34) 1100-1100 w .... ley Ave. -COnstruct 40'-vida pevinq (I & 3),
install Type •a• Industrial on north and south aides.
... 13 ..
I . •
I
•
•
• •
1800-1900 W. Baker Ave. -Construct 40'-wide paving (8 & 3), install Type "B"
Industrial on north and south sides.
Samuel M. Vardeman, Vardeman Junk Yards, 1985 W. Baker Ave. (1100)
Gary Sandritter, 1835 W. Baker Ave. (1420)
2000-2100 W. Baltic Place -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 & 2), install CWII on
north and south sides. Relocate poles to north side of street.
Norvin Larson, 2020 W. Warren/2033 W. Baltic Pl. (1511)
Pat Mahoney, 2000 W. Warren Av.
3500 S. Bannock St. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 & 2), remove and replace
existing vertical curb & gutter with 5' walk on east & west sides as necessary.
Mike Cooper, 3597 S. Bannock St. (2030)
Colleen Burke, 3594 S. Bannock St . (2245)
Vickie Russ, representing Leo Huls, 3560 S. Bannock St . (2503)
Terry Schaff, 3590 S. Bannock (2620)
3600 S. Bannock St. -Construct 32 -wide paving (6 & 2), ~ve and replace
existing vertical curb & gutter w/5 -.. lk on east and west sides as necessary .
Bill Batt representing 1 .. ...,.1 L11tMn1 C rc:h, HtS S. k-St.
Mark Wolf, Chah .. an of the Board of Tn~st•s, •---1 llltMrn Church, 3695 S. AcOIN St.
3700 S. Bannock St. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 & Z), re.ove and replace
existing vertical curb & gutter w/5 -.. lk on east and .. st sides as necessary.
Dorothy Wi111.-s, 3766 S. Bannock St .(Z56)
Joyce and Phil Regas, 3764 S. Bannock St . (liS)
Genevieve Tressler, 3769 S. Bannock St .(ttl)
Darell Lakin, 3733 S. Bannock St . (1094)
Doug and Crystal Ol•stead, 3715 S. Bannock St . (1262)
Dorothy will t .. s returned to podtu. (1545)
Elt~abtth Grang r , 3819 S. Bannock St. (1593)
•
•
I . .
•
•
• •
3900 S. Bannock St. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 l 2), remove and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter w/5'walk on east and west sides as necessary.
No one appeared.
4000 S. Bannock St. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 l 2), remove and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter w/5'-walk on east and west sides as necessary .
Arlene Erickson, 4097 S. Bannock St. (1705)
1800-1900 W. Caspian Place-Construct 40'-wide paving (8 l 3), install Type
~a~ Industrial on south side; install Type "B" Industrial where not existing
on north side.
Alan Huggins representing Merrill Engineering, 2390 S. Tejon, for property
boardered by Caspian, Tejon, Raritan, and Wesley (1803)
3800 S. Delaware St. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 l 2); re.ove and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter w/5'-walk on west side as necessary; re.ave
and replace existing vertical curb l gutter w/4'-walk and install 4'-walk
where not existing on east side.
Laura Brown, 3847 S. Delaware St . (1843)
J ... s Kelley, 3876 S. Delaware St . (2100)
Audrey L. Scott, 3855 S. Delaware St. (2334)
Mary Trouth, 3868 S. Delaware St. (2500)
3400 S. E .. rson St. -Construct 32'-wtdt pavtng (6 a 2), tnstall CWII on east
stdi. Install curbwalk II where not existing on .. st side. -..ave and
replace extsttng curbwalk II where necessary on .. st stdt.
Cliff Johnson representing Swedtsh Medical Center, 501 E. Ha.pden Ave .
Letter of protest ude 1 utter of record.
2900 S. Galapago St . -Cosntruct 30'-wtde pavtng (8 a 3), Install Type "B"
Industrial on east side. Install vertical curb and gutter on west side.
No one appeared .
Trent Meininger , 2332 and 2334 W. Hillside Ave . (2835)
Dtan Reid, 2024 W. Harvard Av e. and 2000 W. Harvard Ave. (2890)
Rodney Hansen, 2288 W. Htllstdt Ave . (83)
Ross Henderson, owner of thrtt blocks on Htllstde Ave . (226)
,
I . •
•
•
•
• •
000 W. Jefferson Ave. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 & 2), remove and replace
existing vertical curb & gutter w/5'-walk on north and south sides as
necessary. Extra paving width on west end of block to by paid for by City.
Pat Shank, 3606 S. Acoma St. (269)
000 W. Kenyon Ave. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 & 2), remove and replace
existing vertical curb & gutter w/4'-walk on north and south sides as
necessary.
No one appeared.
100 W. Kenyon Ave. -Cosntruct 32'-wide paving (6 & 2), re.ove and replace
existing vertical curb & gutter w/4'-walk on north and south sides as
necessary.
No one appeared.
000 E. Kenyon Ave. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 & 2), re.ove and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter w/7'-walk on north side as necessary. Re.ove
and replace vertical curb l gutter w/4'-walk on south side as necessary.
No one appeared.
100 E. Kenyon Ave. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 l 2), re.ove and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter w/9'-walk on north side as necesary. Re.ove l
replace existing vertical curb l gutter w/4'-walk on south side as necessary.
No one appeared.
3600 S. lincoln St. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 l Z), re.ove and replace
existing vertical curb and yutter w/walk (walk width varies) on east and west
sides as necessary. Instal 4'-walk on cul-de-sac where not existing.
No one appeared.
3700 S. lincoln St. -Construct 32'-wide paving (6 l 2), re.ove and replace
existing vertical curb l gutter w/5 '-walk on east and west sides as necess1ry .
D1vid Miller , 3700 S. lincoln St. (455)
Shelly Fritz, 3762 S. lincoln St. (870)
re.ove and rep lace
st sfdes as necessary .
No on app .. red.
~.,_.:;:.:.~=:=::.r-St~. • Construct 40 '-wide paving (8 l 3); install Type
and st sides.
Bruc LC*d raflk, 1950 W. Dart.outh Av., representing the LC*d raflk r .. ny
Sttv n lh rn, ag nt for the LC*deratlk property (1050)
O.v d rost.. repr s nt ng lbcMirne property on Shotshon (1143)
•
I . •
•
•
• •
thre' let.~ers of pro~e t ccepted into the record
1/ a; ~.n'? ~ ck-tPl-'
1600-1700 w. Wesle~ ve. ~nstruct 4~are p~ving {8 l 3), inst~ll Type "B" lndustri~l on nort side. Construct Type "B" Industri~l where not existing on south side.
No one appeared.
1800-1900 W. Wesle~ Ave. -Construct 40'-wide paving {8 l 3), inst~ll Type "B" Industrial on nort and south sides.
No one appeared .
I . .
/. Ch/£:: ;//) /.30 jJ· 7JJ .
. '/l<n •27' 2
tf{;ld~
~ ~L.L-i
AGOOA ITEM __ _
•
• •
PIESENTm IY ------
~ ~ ~ ~~eM
(Y~fn,
j/~~
;:;~;--1-cu~~
SI:C_: ___ ~:::..::....!::..!!::::.~:.._
0
USUUS: ____________ _.L..£L#J,~
•
I . •
•
•
. . •
11/i tj f t:JY . ~ (3 /f(.
;J If# 33
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTm BY --------
.). if-/
!:33 Lt
dlh1-i!.t ~A ~ '-" u / _/ Y u o--..
•
~v ~
f ~· ';;-f 0-J
;( ? t::k,/-t/? 9
9~~(/ /~ f ~ l't?a -/l,.9 ~ -g ~
J > ),_ t' y r c.....-
( ~~
•
I . •
•
•
, . •
~/ / /9.P2 ./ ~ -/9J?9 .... c
tJ/1.;._ ~ ~ ~-~= ~
AGEJI)A ITEM
•
I . •
•
•
• •
j /)/,{--" ~//~ ~ 9· g_
~~, '-------~ r ~ (
....-c:__-,...-~ ~ -.5] •
_ ;/~vr ~ J /C19; ,5<
-.e:--~.~ /~(
.)
IIOTIOih P7 ______ ...::::::;:._____..£:____.t.~~+__J_~_.i.?~-~/~t:J ~f!) ~
I . •
• -
•
, . •
AGEJI)A ITEM ---
j
..e~~t.~~ /' e ----=r---;>.w::=-if;J//d::.tt,~_ ~7~ 7
~ (!,t9-fk d ,A-
•
• • SfCOIIh _--:.;-IC.J~~~~:.....O
lUUlTSa _____ ~~~~2-;~~~::..:.=~c I . •
•
•
, . •
-----79 I 5
9 --15" 'Y' / v~ _ v c-h
AGENDA ITEM L--f / • ---PRESENTm BY ------
tj/) ;J-/ /a_d;/!
fi~
f J ~ ;tJe..-;-1-1'1'1 I
Pa-r" ? J ~ flj .~,
Aift .. ,. iP r~ _; ~ "? ~J
~~G/~ \
/ § tUihuh f__ f? / 5
/'&. -/Z " / • ? .2 f
':?A~ f.tSIC f-i.~-
•
•
I . •
•
•
, .
I •
JOC/0 !/ lfM y
~ ~...--> (f) (@
fiOTIOih
IUSULTS-:-1 -------I . •
•
• •
!) I ?00 -/Cfoo teJ . 43~
~/}1. f/!V?~~j PRESoom "'iv
;qt~ w. /3:J_.kvv
/ ---qA 6~~-oo -~~c-~ ~ ~~ /'__k! E' yY .v~/
If"'/-Q~ fJJ-vrj-~__/)~
'I/ ,.--r~ ../'7 ~ 7 /~c_
,r r f (>j· J ,. f -.) ,--
!?-~ + ,:; -.r'. '-
~r. /);,.I c,
~ •' ~ /""& J f~ {
_f A ' · ~~ , .q,k.::"l!u7T .t-t'-..:&~ J. 'J ' ,-j ~Kua"ff'h v o.J
MOTJOih • / /1" (D L _.) C' A __.,..v ~e...c e ~---'d'--?
I . •
•
• •
AGEJI)A ITEM ---PIESENTm IY
!4hP-t~ -:rv ,2. '/'] ~?'-' h
/ /. /9/SaJ d~ h _)-r
~ ,u---, /2..--y c; re-, ~~I{ so~r ../ Crc/:'
/ -4---'
~-Ci4tt £i.,. ~ !)<. )< ~ ? ,;:; ~
(/~;#n.t~ --z.' c., @ f ~ /"-'-"au-OL.,
Olqk -l /' .-----.rr / ?<.-A4 "£' C.:C
1
f/a -?tltHftUCn -tP / / _ ~ ..-v .-<> .:/ b
-f..J/'/S
c:l~h-_) L-/ J
I . •
•
•
)/d;cA tr> ~ 9-7
4~l ;;;2-j
•
• •
)5/J.{}
;} OCJo-:J too w.~~ ~
rY'MAJt?n ~oAo ww~
cuk3~
3!~~
..t:,..tJ/'~~(k-'6~ .(~__)
~/·
8 f~,......., r-...)
MOTIOII:
-:t. .L -~ /. r-<?r)
S(CCJIID :
USUlTS a
../ 70 f; :tj o/ .,.
I • •
• -
• •
~"-~-twre-ad I ffi~
-/ //?~.,/-~ /
--I 1;} ~ 7) J k~1 1
/Jmd~
I . •
•
•
(}) /?t7
(])~~ CJ = _) p 9~ ?c(/
ASElmA ITER ; 0 ~ '-
•
PIESENTm IY ------
~~ / fd/k /\
0e )C:.>C-.X::
../
)!~-~~~ 9/!J ~_.....
~~ ~~aad
k ~/-t / ,./
~ )C.. )L. ~
~-
~ CO..,~/
~
/ye/
IIOTIOM: • 2< ------~~-------
p
•
I . •
-
•
• •
•
• •
U b;/ '--c ~ 2-v r .JA-~
AGEII)A ITEM ---
L ) ~ r~J/ r
~ ~~cJ c--r-/G-CJW
PRESENTED BY -----~J-::f__! ~7-----{ o_;----
e-~ j c:-r -J ,;;;;J../ .___/-
CJO~'/
35t:Jo S . ~~-n(Jc/_
~~~ ~~97S.~,
t(. ~h#'~
-r~ ( ~d, J(_
~~ c
IIOTJOih V ~~~~~~~--
I . •
•
•
, . •
~-Cut:U( ,/ ~ ' 6 U)a.c:l ~
2-y cf \
.. EIIJA ITIII ( /' ~..fm.: 9 L' t '\
f c72-7 , cJ -cuay ~ \
~n ~~ o--v-J~ /'
"'/ / ,.,,
~
S£COIIh
c -c...-&'
j .~.-/(t
//'{ G/ 7 (" ~
~~? ~ (.
____..c;;..;:...· --7 • ;; ~
t ~~~~~
. { r ~ (____./ /'2_~
~~-;.r;pr-
\
:--------I . •
•
• .. •
AGENDA ITEM ---PRESENTm BY -----
~--r-' ~ .3 5'"1'( _( ~
6, r d-:Z /9s-6 Po
{/~~d_ r /~ ~ ~ /" ........__;, -c=-P ~ ~
I . •
• •
•
• •
~~::::::!!!!~~~~~.~-:-= . ..;..;..~-:-~~--...:..:._::__..~~=--
A/at,~ ~ _) ~---
PRESEHTm BY -----
~-/ ~;;~ L--~
//~
~v~
cCe/ ( ~zj
/f v ~ ./' (!.tud ..b~
I . •
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTm IY --------
7'~ /CJ:; ~~<>-~___.,/
__/2_-~ ~ z G/ ,
/Oe.-~
'-----{ . ~ \ c--.r> ~----( £
Af2;ut4d ( / ( ~d¢u.d
/5
;)67!> ;:;~~ ----3s-roSo.~
@ 0--<A? r.(
MTIOih @
/ l.__,./ a:::.c
SECOIIh
l[SUlTSI I . •
(/(/. c
•
AGEfi)A ITEM ---
•
• •
PRESENTm IY -----
/?~fo 30ooJ ~~
37&0 .J. /3~c{
~~~·4 r-~~~
{?~ /"] c; / r~
-z; c.-/~~
....... ~/
'!Uf ?l% / _/ /'
'7,~~ ~ /~
•
I . •
-•
• •
----·
AGOOA ITEM ---
1/£2 ~/ ( 7 (// (!p._;p1 ~
!0'1 elay~ tf1 ~ f v fi
...__..,}c.-~{Poo I kS~t:?cK &, a-ut(_~
•
&d 7~ ~ /ZJ ae&-:7 6 &......._
~~ ~ 3700 J. ~oc-6
c-a~-<-lr'~~"-~~
j2..J
d.tr!n. >-/ / ~.dv 1/ Jc " .>(
~a;:tt )/ ? J u ~~ r y __,~_./;;-' ...1~ Co ,-/'/
F --o. /'~~ ,)C...')LX
ddt _/.--<f),..-~ Ca-...-~/~
J L
ltOTICih
-~~~4 --:::z~. ---:v=:;::=:-~-.J:--.. .~-~--.
S(COII):
l£sut.TS-: -------
/3
•
I . •
• -
• •
or' .------; / tl s /J
PREsEifllti)ay v -----
h / /' /) <.__...) '-ti' / .:/'-r--,d./
/' ~c-pv C¥ D-~oc £ ~
YJ?rz:l-"/G i -" ~ ;r-r
Y~""j}L .-r = ~/] ~ ~~__,7 ~
0 7/ ~ ,?-7 __; ~
--------=---
3?ooJ ~~·
• I . •
-I'
• -
• •
---
NOTIC*:
SECOII»: • I . •
•
• -
• •
-..---:.__._---=-=--~-=--
/:;db {{/af/ 5.:<-f ~.H-<kd. . /
-v ~ m~ --f,!. v
,.-z_&
@ /) ~~ /2L c{~&~Ck ~ c_f'
t ~d.---'
(2_/ '-----' .-) ) / ~ ~-/
r( ---7 ' 7 '----' -p7 ./""
///~~~)(._/~57
/~~ a4?? -.; ~ 'C.__p ~ ~7---e
~-r -~ ~~
~_/9-r~/
•
74.~
. ) ,.-__IT, ?
MOTION:
• I . • •
•
•
• •
MOTICII:
I . •
•
•
• •
AGEJI)A ITEJIJ ----, PIESDITm IY
tf 4!U-V / ~ ,; ./ ..__, ~ _)_ c '
/?·~~,r ~<-../)/{X -c./~~
I,~~---/" ~-9~ _-;r-,
~
c-r; ~ / ,..-y" hdo / ~ ~~
~ @ ____{" Cl.L.L t?c~d / ~ / <..--? /
;']~r--/-;;t~fi? ~\
/r~/ ~~-<"~
__ ,_, --~ ~
IIOTIOIC: A:-:::~~~--=----=~::_~/.::::'.&~---
)(
•
I . •
•
•
• •
~~-~/?·/~
r-~p~/~,
~ c..-h?L-OJ
f/~-~L-P 7 / {/L--~ ~ ~//P -----_h -
~ ~ / ~t...L~
,;(/,a/uu7' -t;l'-.., ~ /0 ~
r--e__ ~ .7 ~ ~ 7r~
,., r"7 ~· r
IIOTI•: ====-----=71-::z..:=:~~~~~·:::::·~:::_-YJ.
•
I . •
•
• •
--~ --~-------~----
•
,,
y~~;J~~
/~ (9 ---u r' OJ~~ /~
MTJ•: -------------------
SU.: -------
IUUUS: ------------------I . •
........___ --
A&EJI)A ITEJII
•
• •
---PIESEIITm IY -----
c____--,. ..u--A ~. "7: / z:r;> _,
c/: _/ .;; -c.ua.y A~
~~ 'La--~ 2 ·r! -/ _/_.;?
~ -=--r-~ f-_..cU.d!L v ~
~
~-wa-y ~ ~ //'? ~
..... ---a~ ffcJ ....--v--...__/ -,a_... h_
. ;;.. -u.Ja_y ~
~-r.-
I . •
•
• •
MEJI)A ITER ---
4e<uL-tc/u--t / r .1--z ~ r<1v7 J
~ /t?l./7 _...., /t:?s-~ • ,~r--/~
d-r /9~
c;.--/',1 ' ·---~
!!t -$/-/'1<17 cT" /6 .),/" ;7' ? -_;, ~~r~....-
..,ta•: 6) ~ r--_f r~
?. \
• I . •
•
• •
AGOOA ITDI ---
~ ~.L t'~ ,-a_ (~-~ r
~ f:;, /' ~ r' _...-,
•
SEC-: RESUlTS -: ____ __:__ I . •
•
-
•
• •
•
•
• •
AGOOA ITEM __ _ PIESOOm IY -----
J7r'J
~~-~~
~~
~~~J-~
~d _)~/y
d~cf_.) -~
V9-r ~ e-/
J---,...< -~a ~J
-/ cuu-~ /~~
~ ~~-/'~
S£COIID:._--:--:~---....,..._
lESUl.TS: _ _£_:_::::.::==::~_Jj2..:::,!~~~:...:.___=:::~c= .
.r J (J.,.,
" 0 . Jl~ . 0 ----
I . •
•
•
• •
We, the undesigned, residing in the 3800 block of South Delaware
Street, oppose Paving District 33.
I . .
•
•
.. •
--•
3~c90 _J. ~
JJ:r~ lTrr~ fd? ~ rt£SOOf1J"' __ 3_e_q_7_J_. £Jd
~a/___,-J
.;b /,
~-<..l.~t~ r-/
,....-,
~
• MTIC*: -------------,.....-~~-
• I . •
\ UCO.: _________ ,___
U TS :--.A:_....;._ __ ____,:;~---,-,r':lll'-------
•
• • . '
3f7&, J . &/
-r-~ / e...__--t r "'-f /1 . /
~ ~ J~~.__.~-c??~
yf /f'v ---,
~ ~~ ·~T J
~~
S(CCJM»: g
~$oo '3ooo
~C/O
I£SUl.TS:_---=-~--r--J.....,......_~~,...._...,._ ____ _ I . •
•
• •
())J gf ~_/ h-£~ ~ \
~ (/~0-f-c( /-->:-x. F, &:('-
AGENDA ITEit PIESOOm IY -----
•
.;ls i)?;> ma ,~ Jt
..,TIOih -~~~-.L..diollla::UU::."-'"::::l...£1ir:s/.LJt....___.c~--
• $(CCIII): ____ ___, ____
U TS: .. _:_:_:....__..:.__~_z:...::;:.7.:___:/:__~~:..L_~~&_ • I .
(f(tS
/}
•
• •
~7 ff
AGOI)A ITEM ---PI£SEXrm IY -----
I . .
) % /
•
• •
PRESENTm BY
I . •
A&EimA ITEM
MOTI t
S(t I
•
•
, . •
..../ \
---PRESENTED IY
~-..A' / d------
1 ___/ J/ ./' c# 7 c ~ r
fo /"" ---<::JIIE ,/a-~ ~ ol4_
~'
-.!!--" 9 -t ~ /& e..P
1 /' / cr __..J/"
~/
.ty.; c.__. /"" __) / -./' ~
I . •
•
•
, . •
12s~~~
~/ d-/~t? -'
J'3)
AGEJI)A ITEM ---PIESDfTED IY -----
~,{tn<-£ ...:._.. ~ :n ~ "'--s...p_ ~ '
ol'>')" ,o--r-r~' ~ ..R~ ~~a4..,
I . •
•
• •
-v c:::::J
AGOOA ITEM PRESENTm IY ------
MTIOih --:--:--------------~ --~~~~~~~~~v~~
SlCOIID I __ ~ _ _...c;.....;._----. __ ..-...~
l£SUl.TS 1_-t2~~~~~!2.,2--------I . •
•
AGENDA ITEM __ _
•
• •
PRESENTm IY -----
£RMU;f
---nr.dlA._;
c_fi 37ooJ CC~~
)..../
I . •
•
• •
:!'a~~ ~r ~ r'c.-J ~
/~ c./ t2-itL~'
A&EIIlA ITEM ~ // PI£SOITm IY
./ -
------
I . •
•
•
,. •
PIESEIITm IY -----
&~1 ---~~ '--7 ~·.J~
~-~ vv,-o6,
~v .
_ "". J :;/ ;;_~_./r /-<9. \ r~
,----.y-r ~tr-2, ~..-A ~ _, ~,
tfs-7
y<-b' ~ ,£_/ J ~ ~~~ '9r
P?o/ 4A4;1~ 3 7C. Z-s e):_.-~
d(~ £' _.,., .> /
/ 0 •
ltOTIOeh
•
• •
A600A ITEM PRESENTED IY -----
~ /)
/ ~ v LJ, fo
_, --:z__,. ~ ----P' ~ ./-(
~ c-/' --~ c, / c_a_/
c_,r--6'
1'70,CO:? ~
~ /f )/ /v/ .., '-"~
z I'
IIOTIOih ~ _/ 7 ./" i
C'~
I . •
•
•
,·
l •
AGEJI)A ITEM PIESENTm IY -----
.-----
;;413
MOlJOih =~::::::,:::::_:~~=~~~~~~~
• I .
-
•
•
. --------
//,
•
• •
1~&%-~-_52-~~.,_ ~ K v
AGENDA naf 0 "-PRESEJITm IY ---........... ~,., ( _r ~ ~~_Q..j(~
"?_/I~
~
;2q3) d~ --~~~~
J/a4 dtm~ 4:---~-t#a-kv
/~)~r~'l
/f'M.d~
~r-~ ~ --e?J ,.-?
tf?_....~ ~Y ~ //~.><.,)(.~
_/ fV / ~~"
I . •
•
•
,. •
PRESENTED IY
9 // / { /_a_c_c-~-~--~ ...-?,
I . •