The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985-01-07 (Regular) Meeting AgendaCity Council Meeting -Reg ular -Ja nuary 7, 1985 • • • 0 • • - 0 0 I . . • • • • • • AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 7, 1985 1. Call to order.~~ ~ 2. Invocation by Father Timetk) Ryan, Saint Louis Catholic Church, 3310 South Sherman Street. 3. 4. s. 7. Pledge of al legia nce by Boy Scout troop #92. //)J') (Jct)_~ Roll Call. b'J Minutes. (a) Minutes of th e r eg ular mee t ing of December 17, 1984. Pr e-Sc heduled Visitors. to 10 minut es .) (Please limit your presentation (a) Mr. William Owen, Director of Wastewater Treatm ent Plant, w ill be present to discuss a recommendation to award a construction contrac t to Weaver Con- struction for the Littleton/Englewood WWTP Phas e III Construction in the amount of $4,127,202 plus a ten percent construction contingency of $410,000 for a total authorization of $4,537,202. These funds have been set aside and are available in the 1985 budget. Non-Scheduled Visitors. to 5 minutes.) (Please limit your presentation • I • • ( • • • - Page 2 January 7, 1985 A ge nda 8. Communi c ation s and Pr oc l ~~at i on s . (a) Letter from Mr s . Lo i s Sterling, Vice Chairman of the Library Advis ory Board, recommendin g reapp o int- me nt for Mr. Bruc e Hogue and Mr. Jerry Valdes. (b) Letter from Mr. Bruce Hogu e , Library Adv is or y Board Member, concerning reappointment. (c) Letter from Mr. Doyet Barbre, Planning and Zo n i n g Commission Member , con c erning r e appointm e nt. (d) Letter f rom Mr s . Vi r gin ia Dawson, Board of Adj ustm e nt and App e als Memb e r, con ce r n in g her reapp o intm e nt. (e) Letter f rom Mrs. Bett y K eena , Board of Caree r Servic e Commis sio n e r s Me mb e r, co n ce rn i n g he r te rm expiration. (f) Letter from Mr. E dd ie Tangu ma , Pla nnin g and Z on i n g Commission Me mb e r, conce rn i n g r e appointment. (g ) Coun ci l Commu nica t ion fro m Mr . Harr y Fl eeno r, Chai r - man, Court Adv iso r y Co mm i tt ee , c on c er ning th e te rms of ser v ic e f or th e Comm i t tee . 9. Consent Age nda It e ms . (a ) Mi nut e s of th e D o wnto wn Develo pm ent Aut ho r i t y me e tin g of Nove mb er 14 . 1 9 84 . Mi nut es o f t h e Board of Adjus tm e nt and A p p e a ls mee t ing of Nove mb er 14 . 1984 . ( b ) Minutes of the Planning and Zoni n g C om mission meeting of December 4. 1984 . (c) (d) Minutes of the Englewood Public Library Advisory Board of December II, 1984. (e) Transmittal of the Englewood Downtown Development Authority Budget for the year 1985. ( f ) Information from the Library Advisory Board concern- ing organizational procedures, officers of the Board and their duties, and annual election of officers . Ordinance on final reading approving an easement to the Public Service Company for the installation of a gas line at the Bi-City Waste water Treatment Plant to serv the proposed north return activated sludge pump station. • I • • • • • Page 3 6)i January 7, 1985 Agenda ~ 9. Consent Agenda (Continued). (h) ty e ~1ft0 I ~~~ \ 10. Ordinance on final reading approving an amend e d Bill which provides a process for the appointment of Associate Judges. Public Hearin g . ( • 11. Ordinances, Resolut ions and Motions. S . (a) d~\~ ( b) ( c) (d) (e) Recommendation from the Water and Sewer Board to approve Southgate Sanltat io n District's Supplement #104 to annex approximately 2 .3 acres to th e Distri c t. Recommendat ion from th e Water and Se wer Board to approve Greenwood Villa g Sewer General Improvement District's Supplement #9 to annex approximately 30 acres to the District. Recommendation from the Water and Sewer Board to approve the Tri-City Dissolution enabling th e ci ti es of Den ver and Englewood to ind •pendently o wn an d operate th e respecti ve water rights held for each City b y the Trust. Recommendati on from the Wattr and Se wer Board t o approve a Lic ense Agrte ment betwe e n the Ci ty of Englewood and Leslie N . John son to allow the installation of an 8" du c til e iron wat e r pipe across the City's right-o f-way at Windermere and Belleview. Recommendation fro m Council Member Jo e Bilo, DRCOG Representative, to approve a Resolution supporting the proposed location of the Correctional Facility on State land located at the Lowry Bombing Ran ge . (f) Recomm endation from the City Manager to approve a Resolution appropriating funds in the amount of $10 ,000 for the Taxi-Coupon Program for the elderly and handicapped citizens of Engle wood. • I • • - • • • • • • Page 4 January 7, 1985 Agenda 12. City Manager's Report. 13. Letter from Mr. David Bean, Assistant Director/ Governmental Accounting Programs concerning the City qualifying for Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1983. (b) Manager's Choice~~ j) .A JJ -W'-' '&.J., t ~ t"i-· · · -I /UH.A...:, i ~ ~ -~~~ ·~~~~~~ City Attorney'f'Report. 1 Q (a) City Attorney's Cho i ce. '-1~*~ ~ lJ'-1 14. General Discussion. (a) Mayor's Choice.-~~~ v ~~ (b) Council Member's Choice. l~. Adjournment. I , /) , , ~: ~ ~ c7"" / //lo[;V: //,c(,·;,i Y\.. L AND / MC COWN Cit Manager AM/sb • I • • • 1. 2. • • • AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL 7:30 P.M. Call to order. rn~{]kt;j Invocation by -J-~ ~ 3. Pledge of allegiance by J \~ ~ ~ Ro\htl. l '::/-~A_,, mt ( ;; 4/l/fb-;r---=--- 5 . Minutes. (a) 6. Pre-Scheduled Visitora (Please limit your presentation to 10 minutes.) • I • • • • • AGENDA ITEM .-:::::::~ PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlqday v Neal i-- Vobe1da V" Wei st ~ 81 ln v- Bradsh-v- Otis '-"' MOTION: • I • • • • • • - AGENDA ITEM s a__ PRESENTED BY ~~~~~~~~ ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain _11_1gaay I Nea1 - Vobe1da l Weist I y Bl lo I v Bradshaw I Otis \. I • MO!ION:~ • • • • AGENDA ITEM 6 t2__ PRESENTED BY ~ Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain t1tQoav ,_. Neal J,-- Vobeida ) Wei st I ,,,...... RI lo I v Bradshaw l Otis ' I . • • • • • .. • AGENDA ITEM/ ____ _ PRESENTED BY --------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hladay Neal Vobeida Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: I . • • • .. - ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes N•y Absent Abstain HTae1av Neal -Vobeida ""\ Weist I ... Al lo I v--Bradshaw I Otis \.... MOTION: I . • • • • • PRESENTED BY -------AGENDA ITEM ~ D [) ;J ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Aye 5 N ay Absent Abstain Hlg(ia~ Neal ..- t7 Vobeida ' Wei s t I v-Rllo I Bradshaw I Ot i s I. I . • • • • • - AGEND A ITEM I I tt---'-'----PRESENTED BY ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain ,_. HTQdav -Neal --,,..... Vobe-ida ' Weist I RI lo I Bradshaw I Otis '- MOTION: I • • • • • • • 1! lo AG E NDA ITEM ----- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain lITaday Neal -v-Vobe-;da ") Wei s t I R l ln I ../ Bradshaw I Ot is ' MOTION: I • • • • • - AG ENDA ITEM I I(.__- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes N•y Absent Abst•ln Hladay Neal -V' Vobeida ) Weist I v Bl lo I Bradshaw ( Ot i s "- MOTION: (}_, r3 Ji 1 • I • • • • • • • AG ENDA ITEM ----- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes N•y Absent Abstain _11_1_9oay -Nea1 -Vo be i da \ / Wet st J ... Bl lo I ,,/ Bradshaw I Otis \. • MOTION: 0f} ,p-([J I • • • • • - AGENDA ITEM --il,/1--e---=--PRESENTED BY -~i'--'U~'---~--- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain 111aaav Neal -Vobe1da I Weist I /,/""" Bl lo I v Bradshaw I Otis \ ""'"'"' V0o"~ I I I • • • • • - AGENDA >TEM ~ ~u~ ~~ ~6.S ~ ~Vil~~~ 3&nw~~?>o~ ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes N•y Absent Abstain _r1_1gaay ~ Neal -vobeida We1 st / Bllo I ......... Bradshaw I Otis '\. MOTION: • I • • • • • AG ENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY 711 ~ ~M1<J ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Mluuay Neal Vobe1da Weist 8119 Bradshaw Otis MOTION: I . • • • • - AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY ------ tJ~ ~ ~ tf)MVM vJ_~ ~iu l,~ ~~ ~~ ~ IYt ~ 2r ~ ~ ~~ () rYt1 ' ~DJ~ 7J>~?7'1&,oq~~ 11?J ~ ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes N•y Absent Abst•ln MIQOay Ne•I Vobeida We_1 st Bl lo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: • • I . • • • AG ENDA ITEM /3 e-PRESENTED BY ~ ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abs ta In Hlaaay Neal -Vnbeida ' Wei s t J v Bl lo I v-Bradshaw I Otis \. MOTION: I • • • • • • • AGENDA ITE M -~/_3 __ _ PRESENTED BY --------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Abstain HIQClav - Neal - Vobe,da I \Jelst 7 I/' Bl lo I v Bradshaw \ Otis ....... I • • • • • • • PRESENTED BY ~(jj;u---"----·--- ~ /.,ak 31> ~ o ~ ~r 0-J7t · ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H!Qdav Neal Vobe;da Weist Al lo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: I • • • • - • REGULAR MEETING: • • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS City of Englewood, Colorado December 17, 1984 5 A The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado , met in regular session on December 17, 1984, at 7 :30 p.m. Mayor Oti s , presiding, called the meeting to order. The invocation was given by Council Member Higday. The pledge of allegiance was led by Boy Scout Troop #115 and #154. Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, .Bradshaw, Otis. Absent: None. The Mayor declared a quorum present. * * * * * * * Also present were: City Manager Mccown * * Assistant City Manager Vargas City Attorney Olsen Fire Chief Broman Director of Utilities Fonda Deputy City Clerk Owen * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER WEIST MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 1984. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. City Manager Mccown noted a correction on Page 11, para- graph 4. The proper spelling of the plaintiff's name was Dulin. Council accepted the editorial change. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * • I • • • • - December 17, 1984 Page 2 COUN CIL MEMBER NE AL MOVED TO APPROVE A PROCLAMAT I ON COMMENDING DAVID R. BEECH ER F OR HEROIC EFFORTS I N SAVIN G TH E L IFE OF BARBARA MATTHEWS ON DEC EMB E R 8, 1984 . Council Memb e r Bilo seco nded the motion. Upon a call o f the roll, the v o te resulte d as follows: Ayes : Na y s: Council Members Hi g day , Neal, Vo b ej da , Wei st , Bilo, Bra d shaw, Otis. No n e . The mayor declared the motion c a rried. Mayor Otis pres e nted the proclamation t o Da v id Beech er . Mr. Beecher and Ms. Matthews explained the accident. Mr . Beech er praised the Englewood F i r e Department and the P o l ice Department for r e spo nding so quickly to the c all. ova t i on. Council and the audience g a v e Mr. Beecher a standing Ms. Matthews stated how thankful she was that Mr. Beec h er h ero ically "preser ved h e r li fe ." * * * * * * * Direc t or of Uti li t ies S t u Fond a came forwa rd a nd p resented a r ecommendation t o awa r d t he bid fo r t h e c ons truc t ion of Union Avenue Pum p Statio n to Lil l ard a n d Clark. Ma yor Oti s noted the Water and Sewer Board h as reviewed this project and recommended the a ward to Lillard and Clark. Director Fonda stated when the projects costs are known, he would return to Council; however, the present time his best estimate was $1,267,629 . COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE UNION AVENUE PUMP STATION TO LILLARD AND CLARK FOR $1,2 6 7 ,629. Council Member Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda , Weist, Bilo , Bradshaw , Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried . • I • • December 17, 1984 Page 3 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO ISSUE THE NOTICE TO PROCEED WITH THE UNION AVENUE PUMP STATION. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda , Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * Director Fonda presented a recommendation from the Water and Sewer Board to approve the electric distribution line extension agreement for the Englewood Pump Station at West Union Avenue and South Platte River Drive. The cost of this line is shared with the Colorado Water Conservation Board. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE THE ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE EXTENSION AGREEMENT WITH THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR THE AMOUNT OF $17,505. Council Member Vobejda seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday , Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis . None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis presented a resignation letter from Marjorie L. Becker. Ms. Becker is resi g ning from the Planning & Zoning Commission. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO ACCEPT THE LETTER OF RESIGNATION FROM MARJORIE L. BECKER WITH REGRET. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. • * • • • • • • I • • n - • December 17, 1984 Page 4 • • • "Consent Agenda" Items were: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Minutes of the Englewood Housing Authority meeting of September 26, 1984. Minutes of the Urban Renewal Authority meeting of November 7, 1984. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of November 20, 1984. Ordinance on final reading approving an inter- governmental agreement with DRCOG establishing a centralized firefighter recruitment/testing program at a first year cost of $1,542 to the City of Englewood. Ordinance on final reading approving the Land- owners Extended Service Area Participation Agreement to investigate facilities needed t o serve properties on the periphery of the Highland Ranch Sanitation District. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS (a) -(e). Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The mayor declared the motion carried. Consent Agenda Item (d), Council Bill No. 64, Series of 1984, was hereby numbered Ordinance No. 61, Series of 1984. Consent Agenda Item (e), Council Bill No. 65, Series of 1984, was hereby numbered Ordinance No. 62, Series of 1984 . RESOLUTION NO. 49 SERIES OF 1984 • • • • • • • A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING OPPOSITION TO SALES TAX "SIMPLIFICATION" LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD ELIMINATE LOCAL CONTROL OF THE MUNICIPAL SALES TAX BASE AND LOCAL CONTROL OF SALES AND USE TAX ENFORCEMEN'r. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 49, SERIES OF 1984. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: • I • • December 17, 1984 Page S Ayes: Nays: • • - Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The mayor declared the motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. SO SERIES OF 1984 * * * * * * * A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF THE FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN CERTAIN LAND IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD FOR THE PURPOSE OF REALIGNING FLOYD AVENUE EAST OF BROADWAY. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO . SO, SERIES OF 1984. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1984 * * * * BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR * * * COUNCIL BILL NO. 66 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A SEWER EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY TO INSTALL A GAS SERVICE LINE TO THE NEW PORTION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO . 66, SERIES OF 1984, ON FIRST READING . COUNCIL Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist , Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * • I • ' • December 17, 1984 Page 6 RESOLUTION No. 51 SERIES OF 1984 • • • A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1985 BUDGET TO SET ASIDE $10,000 FOR A TAXI "CHIP" PROGRAM TO REPLACE THE SENIOR SURREY. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 51, SERIES OF 19 8 4. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO AMEND THE RESOLUTION UNDER "3." TO READ AS FOLLOWS: " THE INCOME ELIGIBILI~TIMITATION FOR APPLICANTS WHO ARE SENIOR PERSONS OVER AGE 65 YEARS OR HANDICAPPED PERSONS WHO CANNOT DRIVE, FOR THE TAXI CHIP PORG IS AS FOLLOWS:" Council Member Higday seconded the motion. Upon call of the roll, the vote on the amendment resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the amendment carried. Upon a call of the roll the vote on the original motion resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Council Member Neal stated he was in receipt of the report prepared by Jim Espinoza of the City Manager's office regarding 1983 income limitations used by other public agenc ies. He would pass on the report to other Council Members if they wanted to view it. Council instructed Dorothy Dalquist, Public Relations Manager, to inform the Sentinel newspapers of this program. RESOLUTION NO. 52 SERIES OF 1984 * * * * * * * A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1985 GENERAL FUND BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING THE POSITIONS OF PROPERTY CUSTODIAN (PART-TIME IN THE POLICE DEPART- MENT) AND EXPANDING A CURRENT PART-TIME CLERK-TYPIST POSITION TO A FULL-TIME POSITION IN LIBRARY DEPARTMENT . • I • • • • • • December 17, 1984 Page 7 COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 52, SERIES OF 1984. Council Member Vobejda seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday , Neal , Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None . The Mayor declared the motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 53 SERIES OF 1984 * * * * * * * A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1984 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO THE SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FUND AND THE AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER FUNDS FROM THE SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION FUND TO THE WATER FUND. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 53, SERIES OF 1984. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Council discussed the rationale behind the transfer. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Nea~ Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Council Member Neal instructed staff to prepare a resolu- tion that would transfer monies that were in excess of $1,000,000 to the special construction fund when it is determined what monies are in excess and carryover. * * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO BRING OFF THE TABLE COUNCIL BILL NO. 61, SERIES OF 1984. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried . I • • .. • • • • December 17, 1984 Page 8 BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1984 COUNCIL BILL NO. 61 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE I, CHAPTER 9, SECTION 2, OF THE ENGLE- WOOD MUNICIPAL CODE 1969, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING A PROCESS BY WHICH ASSOCIATE JUDGES ARE APPOINTED; AND PROVIDING FOR TERMS THEREOF. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 61, SERIES OF 1984, AS AMENDED, ON FIRST READING . Council Member Vobejda seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Council noted this council bill contained the recommenda-tions from the Court Advisory Committee. * * * * * * * Council moved to executive session at 8:25 p.m. to consider the salaries for the City Manager , City Attorney, Municipal Court Judge, and Associate Judges for the year 1985. Council reconvened at 8:45 p.m. Mayor Otis asked for a roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present. Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Absent: None. The Mayor declared a quorum present. * * * * * * * I • • l- • Dec ember 17, 1984 Page 9 RESOLUTION NO. 54 SERIES OF 1984 • • • A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SALARIES FOR THE CI TY MANAGE R, CITY ATTORNEY, MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE AND ASSOCIATE J UDGES FOR TH E CALENDAR YEAR 1985. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 54, SERIES OF 1984 AND THE SALARIES TO READ AS FOLLOWS: CITY MANAGER $ 64,890 CITY ATTORNEY 60,400 MUN I CIPAL COURT JUDGE 48,1S8 ASSOCIATE JUDGE 250 PER DA Y Council Member Higday seconded the motion. Upon a ca ll o f the roll, the vote r e sulted as f ollows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, We ist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Ma y or declared the motion carr i ed. RESOLUT I ON NO. SS S E RIES OF 1984 * * * * * * * A RES OLUT I ON WI THDRAW ING FROM THE FIRE AND POLICE PENSION ASSOCIATION . City Manager Mccown noted this resolution corrected the date of hired to April 8 , 1978, and would supercede the incorrect resolution. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. SS, SERIES OF 198 4 . Council Member Brad shaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Member s Higday, Vobejda, Weist , Bilo , Bradshaw, Otis. Council Member Neal. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * • I • ( • December 17, 1984 Page 10 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT THE RECREATION TRAILWAY EASEMENT FROM THE CITY OF SHERIDAN. Council Member Vobejda seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal , Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None . The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * City Attorney Olsen thanked Council for the raise and confidence in him even though he has been with the City for a short time. * * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO AUTHORIZE CITY ATTORNE Y OLSEN TO DEFEND THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD IN THE DULIN CASE. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * Council Member Neal offered a plan for the purpose of reviewing the zoning matters he previously discussed a few weeks ago. Mr. Neal suggested a process that would begin with Council Members and move through the City organization structure with interim review by the planning staff. Nr. Neal suggested brainstorming this idea at the study session on January 14, 1985. * * * * * * * There was no further business to be discussed. Wishes for a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year were exchanged. • I • • • • December 17, 1984 Page 11 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN. 8 :55 p.m . Mayor Otis adjourned the meeting without a vote at • I . l J I I j • • • '. • C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEH lo°'-- DATE January 7, 1984 SUBJECT Award of Contract for Littleton/ Englewood WVI1' Phase III Construction INITIATED BY William F. Owen, PhD, P.E., Director of Wastewater Treatment ACTION PROPOSEDCouncil to a ward co ntract for Littleton/En&lewood WWTP Phase III Expansion Pro1ect to Weaver Construction Co .• of Denyer. Colorado. I ~'TRODUCTION: The Wastewater Treatment Department is requesting approval and award o f the Phase III construction contract to the low bidder (of five}, Weaver Construc- tio n, for a sum of $4,537,202 to cover contingency allowance. BACKGROUND: For some time now the Cities of Littleton and Englewood have been ?lanning expansion of the Bi-City WWTP to accomodate future growth. Currently, the Cities are constructing an addition to the Englewood WWTP which will provide a n additional ) mgd capacity, raising the total treatment capabilities to 28 mgd. Co upled with this, the c ities hired the Engineering/Architectural firm of Henningson, Durham & Richardson (HDR} of Colorado to design a Phase III expansion to the Joint- Cse WWTP which would increase treatment capacity by another 7 mgd raising the o verall c apabilities to 35 mgd. The design for this expansion, which is expected t o accomodate future ~rowth for 7 to 10 years, was completed in October, 1984. \.le advertised and solicited bids in conformance with the Cities' competitive bidding requirements therefor, and publicly opened bids on December 11, 1984 at the City of Englewood Library conference room at 2:00 pm. A tabulation of the 5 b ids received follows: Weaver Construction 2115 S. Valentia St. Denver, Colorado 80213 McKee Construction 5975 S. Syracuse Suite 100 Englewood, Colorado 80111 Centric Corporation 5490 W. 13th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80214 Robert Dougan Construction Co. 2100 S. Valentia Street 'Denver, Colorado 80231 Suamit Constru c tor~ ~4 72 Valley Hlghwav o~nver, Co l or 1do 8n2 L6 $ 4,127,202 4,302,500 $ 4,434,000 4,466,000 4,674,000 • I • • • • • January 7, 1984 paii;e 2 Award of Contract for Littleton/Enii;lewood WWTP Phase III Construction The Engineer's cost estimate for this work was $5,683,946. FINANCIAL DETAILS: The Cities of Littleton and En~lewood budgeted $6,006,000 in their 1985 budgets for this project (50% each city), distributed as f o llows: Construction $ 4,462,000 Contingencies 594,000 Construction Engineering 300,000 Construction Management 150,000 Other Set Aside 500,000 Total $ 6,006,000 The above costs include prepurchase equipment and provisio n s for e xpanding the existinii; administration buildinii;, whi c h will be bid as a separate co nstruc tio n project later next s pring. Costs for the administrati o n building e xpan sio n are es timated to be $221,983. At the December 3, 1984 council meetinii; the Cit y Co un ..:i l a pproved award of prepurchase equipment c ontract for a total sum of $348,166. The Engineer's cost estimate for the Phase III Construc tion Contrac t .e x clu sive o f the admini~tration buildinii; was $6,123,946, of which $440,000 was apportioned t o pr e purchase equipment and $5,683,946 to the co n struction co ntract pro per . We re cotmnend award of the construc tio n co ntrac t with a 10 % co ntinge ncv allowance to accomodate unforeseen c osts. Hence, should coun c il elect to award t o the low bidder, the total recommended ~ward would be $4,537,202 , of wh i c h $4, 127,202 for construction and $410 ,000 for contin gency. This a ward wo uld fall wi thin the budget for this 1'0rk o f $4,462,000 which had an a dditional contingency al l o wance of $594,000. DISCUSSION: The low bidder, Weaver Construction, is a Denver-based con st ru c t io n f irm. They do construction work nationally but focus in the mid-we s t. Both RDR and OEMC met with the firm's vice president and proposed s uper i n- tendent to assess their understanding of the project and interest in the work. Furthermore, we contacted several references o f past work. We also met 1.:ith the s upervisors and investigated the principal subcontractors proposed for this proj e c t. Sheesley Plumbing and Heating (mechanical) and Gardner-Zemke (elec trical ). Ba sed o n this review, we feel that Weaver Construction will do good work for the ci tie s if they are properly managed, and if all work is closely inspected. Bids and credentials of Weaver Construction were reviewed with the Bi-City Wastewater Treatment Plant Supervisory Coounittee at their regularl y scheduled meeting on December 19, 1984. The Supervisory Committee unanimously recomme nded approval of the c ontract award to Weaver Construction. • I • • - • • January 7, 1985 pa~e 3 • • • Award of Contract for Littleton/Englewood WWTP Pha s e III Construction. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: The low bidder, Weaver Construction, met all the require- ments of the bid specifications and submitted appropriate insurance and bid forms. Based on the Engineer's (HDR) and our review of this firm and their princ ipal subcontractors we are quite confident they will do a ~ood job at a fair price. We recoonnend the council award the 1985 Phase III Expansion co ntrac t to the low bidder, Weaver Construction, for the sum of $4,127,202, with a l0% construc tio n co ntin~ency of $410,000 for a total authorization of $4,537,202 . I • • Mayor Otis, City of Englewood, 343~ South Elati Street Englewood, CO 8~11~ Dear Mayor Otis, • • • Re: Appointment to Election Commission Please be advised that I am willing to serve as a membe r of the Election Commission for the coming four year term. Yours very truly, ·,kit:' L f n_ l .;_.,,_,__, Hazel E. Nilsen January 3, 1985 \ 1/\ j l CITY Mn ,c,,,1 r ,, J t HL. EN GllNIJ{JO • I • • - • ( • City of Englewood Englewood Public Library The Honorable Eugene Otis Mayor of Englewood Colorado My dear Mayor Otis: • • • December 12, 1984 3400 S. Elatl Street Englewood , Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 761·1140 The Library Advisory Board unanimously endorses the candidacies of Bruce Hogue and Jerry Valdes for reappointment to the Board for additional four-year terms. Jerry has served as both Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Board; Bruce has chaired several Board committees. Both are interested in the Li- brary and well-informed about its service to the Englewood community. The next few years will bring many changes to the Library --improved security, an automated system, and a new facility. It would be most helpful to the Board if Jerry and Bruce could continue to serve as Board member s during this crucial period for the Library's development . Co un cil's consideration of their reappointment would be greatly appreciated by all Library Advisory Board members. Sincerely yours, ~ (J,.-' :'J d-U .. y;_-'?./~·.-; ./ . . ' Loi s Ste rling, Vice Chairman Library Advisory Board l ' (I,· '· I • • - ( • • • • • 3844 S. Gr;rn t Engl•wood 80110 Englewood City Council 3400 S. Elati Engl•wood 80110 Mayor Oti• and M•mb•r• of Engl•wood City Council 1 hav• •njoy•d ••rving on th• Engl•wood Public Library Advisory Board for th• past Y•ar and would 1 ik• to b• con•ld•r•d for r•appo in tm•n t. and would 1 ik• to r•spond by making mY••lf availabl• to ••rv• on a board wh•r• I f••l I have som•thing to off•r. Thank you v•ry much for your dil ig•nt •fforts as Council m•mb•r• and for •ol iciting citiz•n input. r.;: ._ r· .. I'' 1·. l . , •. CI TY IMIN~t;r :-~ IHV;t E;o;l;LiW ,JI • Sinc•r•1Y 1 Brue• Hogu• I • • - ( • r " • Mayor 81.J.gene Otis 3400 S . 8lati St reet i nglewo od , Colorado De ar S ir: • • - 4 52 1 S . Ci arks on Englewood, Col orado December 22 , 1984 1 am writing to request that you and members of the City Counc il r e appoint me to the Planning and l.o ning Co mmissi o n when my term expires February 1, 1984. I have enjoyed my terms o n the Commission , ~nd the exciting things that are happening in Englewood make me wish t o c o ntinue t o be a part of them. thank yo u for your confidence in appointing me t o this post f ur the pa.at five years and your consideration of t h i s re quest will be greatly apprec iated . 1:1 ' ' ' 1 "I: 'I ' 1 r, I~, . I I ' ~. I /,' t ·I '""' I H••.I • • . / ,, • • • 3D R r · ;.-.... ·-. . I ~I -• Of: :? Ii 98 4 CITY MAN AG EP S OffJCf £N Gt E vcon I . -• • • 8E Combellick, O'Connor & Reynolds, Inc. Mayor Eugene L. Otis City of Englewood 3400 S. Elati Street Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Gene: Certified Publi c A ccoun ta nts January 2, 1985 Thank you for your letter of December 21, 1984 and the rem i nder my term as member of the Career Serv i ce Board exp ires March 15 , 1985 . Though these three years have been an interesting expe ri ence, I do not i ntend to seek reappo i ntment. If I can assist you or the new appo i nt ee dur i ng the trans i t i on, I wi ll be happy to do so. Si ncerely yours, ,, ~ ' • cc: Don Weber, Cha i rman of the Board Andy Mccown, Ci ty Manager \1emtim Anw.-nran lMtrtutt «If <.i:n.1't>J hibla Arn:•munu ~ [ ( atW ~ll' Ci .. rue, Pnct.cr Stct.:ns Ot\~nl <4 f 111~ ~s.,ll~(/(A"f'b6rdfl\,hl A 1\1A.lntant\ Betty K. !eena RECE I VE D JA N 3 19R ; CITY MANAGElfS OFFICE EN GL EWO OD ln tttNtxlftAl C1r•-.ip c; AwiunlJl\jf fltfn. Alblwtn m P'rn..-J L11.W'5 d tht Wortd 7600 Eas1 Or hard Rd • Harlequin Pl aza Sou ih • u11• I 0 • Eng l•v.ood , <.olo rad o 80 1 11 • !O • H -9}00 • I • • \ (' • • Honorable Eugene L. is "ayor , Ci t y or Ene;lewood 3400 So . Elati ~treet Englewood , Co l orado 8011 0 near Sir: • • • January 1 , 1985 Thank you ror your letter of December 21 , 1984, repardin['; the expiration of my tenn of ot'fice on the Planning and Zoniw Conrnission on Februar:v 1 , 1985 . Tnis letter is for the purpose of requesting that the Englewood City Council consider ~e f'or reappointment to the Planning and Zoning Corenission . I wish to continue lT\Y serv ce to the cit" of' Englei-•ood in thi s capacity . . ince my irs appointment to this omnission j n Petruary , 1973 , I have "'ained a rreat deal of' knowled.P"e and valuable experience in regard to planninr and zonin,,. matters. I bel eve I can con t inue t o be a responsible and errective Comnission memrer. EI':tt Thank you ~or your consjderation . incerel. .rours , Eddie T~, Jr . 1020 West Tu" s ~venu En"'lewood , CoJorqdo Bono • I • - '. • • • • M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: FROM: DA'I'E: SUBJECT: Mayor Otis and Members of City council Harry Fleenor, Chairman Court Advisory Committee December 20, 1984 Term of Service This memo is to bring to your attention that the term of service for the Court Advisory Committee expires December 31, 1984, according to Resolution No. 1, Series of 1984. I am requesting your review of this Committee and determina- tion as to whether City Council wants to extend service for another year. Thank you for your review, and if there is anything you need further please let the Committee know. attachment • I • • t • • • • RESOLUTION NO. l SERIES OF 84 ~~~ A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE TERM OF THE "COURT ADVISORY COMMITTEE". WHEREAS, the Court Advisory Committee is established and existing pursuant to Resolution No. 48, Series of 1981, and Resolution No. 12, Series of 1982; and WHEREAS, the Court Advisory Committee has been helpful in its advisory role; and ' 1984; WHEREAS, City Council desires to extend its term to December 31, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. Resolution No. 48, Series of 1981, Section l thereof, is amended to read as follows: There is hereby established a Judiciary Administrative Review Commission composed of five persons, four of whom shall be residents of the City of Englewood, one of whom shall be an attorney. All members shall serve for a term expiring December 31, 1984, at which time Council shall review the merits of the Commission. Section 2. All terms of the current and future appointed members of the •court Advisory Committee• are extended to December 31, 1984. Section 3. All other provisions of Resolution No. 48, Series of 1981, and Resolution No. 12, Series of 1982, are hereby continued in their approved form until December 31, 1984. ADOPTED AND APPROVED the 3rd day of Janua r y 198'1 Mayor ? ATTEST: ex~o4Yffde~r I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above is a true, a cc urate, and complete copy of Resolution No. l , Series of 1 9 u4. -~1. ~-di?~&/ • I • • • • • - ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3535 S . Sherman -Englewood , CO 80110 MINUTES November 14, 1985 9 Board Members Present: Coleman, Green, Holthaus , Kaufman, Mausolf, Neal, Oswald, Owens , Pendleton, Tomooka Staff Present: P. Dietrich Guests and Visito r s: Steve Albright, Vice President, Pueblo Economic Develop- ment Corporation; Susan Powers, Dorothy Dalquist The regular meeting of the Englewood Downtown Development Authority ~oard of Directors was called to order by Chairman Bill Pendleton at 12:12 PM on Novembe r 14, 1984. The minutes from the October 10, 1984 regular meeting were presented for approval. Mr. Miufman moved, seconded by Mr. Mausolf, to approve the minutes from the previous meeting. The motion was passed unanimously by voice vote. The Treasurer's Report was presented by Dan Green. Mr. Neal moved, seconded by Ms . Owens, to accept the Treasurer's Report. Mr. Green noted that the Bud- get Subcommittee had met and will be prepared to recommend a budget for 1985 at the December regualr meeting. He also noted that year-to-date r even ues have exceeded the es timated projection for 1984. The motion was pa ssed unanimously by voice vote. CHAIRMAN 'S REPORT Mr. Pendleton introduced Stev Albright, Vice Presdient, Pueblo Economic Develop- ment Corporation. Because Pueblo has had some unique problems in the past, Mr. Albright discussed the topic of How To Market A City. He emphasized their advertising campaign , with specific targeted markets. Also, he noted that their information packet regarding the City and County of Pueblo has been a very effective promotional tool. Further, he stated that the downtown realized that it would not go back to its previous viability, but that it could still be very economically healthy. He explained the Small Business Assistance Develop- ment and the land assistance programs that Pueblo offers. Meeting ~ City Council -Mr. Pendleton recapped the meeting with the EDDA Board of Directors and City Council in October. Two important projects that cam from this meeting were a newsletter regarding the downtown activities and th continuation of the Broadway Facade Programs . • I • • Minutes November 14, 1984 Page Two .. • - Transportation Report -South Santa Fe Corridor -The future development of the Santa Fe Corridor was discussed and how it relates to th e Englewood downtown area. Mr. Kaufman noted that the lobbying efforts by the Centennial Chamber of Commerce have been very effective in communicating issues to RTD and the Highway Department . 1984 Parade -Five Board members particpated in the 1984 Annual Englewood Parade. Because of the nubmer of people in the area during the day, it is hoped to do some cooperative promotional work with the merchants next year . DIRECTOR'S REPORT ~ Educational Program -The two visual merchandising seminars/workshops that the EDDA sponsored in October were very successful. Over 40 participants attends these workshops. They were timely and very appropriate to the many types of merchants in the area. Landscaping -~ Improvements~ Broadway -Ms. Dietrich noted that she is working with the Urban Renewal Authority and the Budget Sub Committee for further definition of the proposed design and the financial commitm e nt towards this project. Newsletter -The Executive Director noted that there will be a newsletter published in No vember and also one published in December this year . This is in response to the communication of downtown activities to the merchants and property owners in the area. Slide Show -In cooperation with the City, Ms. Dietrich has written a pre-~ary outline and script for a slide show about the downtown redevelopment project and related activities. This will be used to communicate to local organizations and service groups any information and update regarding the project. Safeway ~ Opening -The Safeway Super Store at 201 East Jefferson will have a grand opening on November 16, 1984 at 5:00 PM. The Board of Director s is invited to attend. Mill Levy for 1985 -The City Council approved a 5 mill levy for 1985. This is an increase from 4.63. Other -Mr. Coleman presented a rendering of a possible lighting effect for Broadway. He noted that the area could be very distinctive and id ntifiable with this concept. • I • • - ( • { • Minutes November 14, 1984 Page Three • • • Urban Renewal Authority -The URA has added a provision to the Relocation Handbook that offers a 'cash in lieu' paym~ of $2500 for businesses that cease operation because of relocation ~ci sions . The business is then not eligible for any other claims. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 1:35 PM. • I • • ( { • • - M1 Nl'Tl . f.l\G U :WC1 0 Jl , COLORAD O BOA RD OJ AJJJllSTM D:l AND APPEALS 9 R Nct v.:!mber ] , 1984 The• regular me ting of th e Board of Adjustmeut and Appeals b e ga n Ht 7 :)f) p .m. wit h C11 aj rm.'.ln Fi s h pre s idin g . .tLMJJI:R S I RESENl: NIJ'IBCRS ABSENT: ALS O PRESLNT: Seym o ur, Ha ] la g in, Brc:"•'Tl, Ga g e , Daws o n , Fer r u son, a nd fi s h . No n . Dor o thv A. Roman s , Staff Advis o r l\an c y R i d , AFsistant Citv Attorney Sh ryl Rousses, Re co rding Secretary * * * * * BOARD ME.'IBER HALLAGJ N MO\'ED THAT THE MH\t;TES OF OCTOBER 10, J 98 L , Bf APPRO\TTJ AS Wl<lTTLN . B0 ard .'!ember Dawson second£d the motion. Upon a v o te , all seve n members voted in the affirmative, a n d th Chairman ruled that the Minutes were APPR O\TD as written. * * * * * The Board un animously approved the findings of Fact in Case No . 26 -84 . * * * * * The Chairman opened the Publ ic Hear ing for Case No . 29-84 . He stat d that th Board is authorized t o grant or den y a variance by Part 3 , Section 60 of th e Englewood City Charter. He stated that he had verification of publica ti o n and posting for the case, and asked that the staff identify the requ es t. Mrs. Rom ans stated that the applicant wishes t o divide thi s propert y so that each of the two hou&es on the Jot can be sold separately. Th applicant is r questing varianc s to p rmit the d ivision of this property into two separate lots, Parcel A and Pare l B, eac h of which would contain one of the existing single-family dw llin .s . The houses ar at 5 50 East Eastman and 3201 South Pear l Street. lf th, varian ce& ne c e s sary to divide th property are denied, the applicant request. that a Lat R gistration of a Nonconforming Use be granted to permit t he continu d use of two singl -family dw elli ng units on a single lot. Thi use has been constant since som time in the 1940 's when th housing dem and en t'nuraged tlw re I ax:it ion of norma l zoninr re gulations. Till' subject propert y is in an R-1-C Single-Family Residen ce District, and the current two-family u se is n ot p rmitted. The division of the propert , as pro- posed hv th e applicant , would requlr th fol l owinn variances: Both r.1r c l H: T0 permit t1.•o dw ]!inns on one lot in a single-family zon district. l'ar e c I A (550 t:n<.t hastmil n) 1. A r•·du , tin11 jn til t• m1nimuri lc>r ar o fror ,000 i;qu ·1r,• f ll l <' 2 .I S'l sq1111n fPl't. • I • • ( ( • • • • -2- 2. 3. 4. A reductio n in the mi nimum rear ya rd from 25 feet to 18 fee t. A redu c tio n in the front ya rd setback f r om 25 feet to 13 feet. A redu c tion in the minimum side yard setback fr om 3 feet to 0 feet. A reduction in the mi nimum required l o t frontage from 50 feet to 47 feet. 5. 6. A reductio n in the minimum numb e r o f off-street parking spaces fr om the requ i red two spaces to one space. Parcel B (3201 South Pearl): 1. A reductio n i n the minimum l o t a rea from the required 6,000 square feet t o 3,900 square feet. 2. A redu ction in the rear yard setback from the required 25 feet t o 18 feet. 3. An increase in the maximum lot coverage from 30% to 35.89%. 4 . A r e duction in the minimum r equired off-street parking f r om two pa r king spaces to 0 spaces. These are variances f rom the Comp r ehens i ve Zoning Ordinance, Section 22.4-4 b (1) - Permitted Principal Uses; Section 22.4-4 c (2) -Minimum area of lot; Section 22.4-4 e -Maximum pe r centage of l o t cov e r age ; Section 22.4-4 f -Minimum frontage of lot; Section 22 .4-4 h -Minimum f r o nt ya rd; Section 22.4-4 i -Minimum side yard; Section 22.4-4 j (2) -Minimum r ear ya rd; Section 22.4-4 k -Minimum off- street parking, whi ch sec tion refers t o Section 22 .5-5 a 10, Private o ff-street parking standards. If the above variances are denied , th e applicant r eq uests a variance from the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance , Section 22 .6 a and b, Continuances of Non conforming Uses, to permit the uses on this property t o be g r a nted Late Registration of a Nonconforming Use. The Chairman asked that the applicant come forward fo r testimony. John Vlasman, 2835 West 128th Avenu e , North glenn, c ame forward a nd was sworn in. He stated that the two houses had belonged to his pa r e nt s . His mother willed the houses t o the four children, and the property has to be liquidated. He said his fami l y owned the ho u ses for 14 years and had no idea that they were no t a legal use. He said that many of the prospective buyers asked to buy one of the houses rather than both. There have always been two families living on the property and there have never been any problems . He suggested that his real estate a ge nt should give evidence . Ther were no questions from the Board . Beverly DeFalco, 1295 Ch rry Hill Road , Littleton, came forward and was sworn in. She sta ted that she is the realtor involved in marketing the property. She said that this is a unique property because there are two houses on one lot. Most of the prospective buyers have been interested in buying o n ly one of the houses, a nd the reason for splitting the property is to hasten the settlement of the estate. The property has always been occupied by two families; and, s he said, granting a variance would not alter the environment e xcept for the squa r e foo ta ge of th e ya rd s. Potential buy e rs have said they would like the smaller ya rd s so that there will be less yard work. Mr. Ferg uson asked how the property is listed. Ms. Defalco said they are listed as indivi dual properties in the milti-list book with a not ation that they must be sold together at this time. Mr. Brown asked if it is impossible to sell both units to one individual. Ms. Defalco said most of the interest has been from people who want only one unit • • I • ( • • • -3- Mr. Fish asked if Ms. Defalco understood t ha t the six requirements for a va riance mu st be met befor e a variance can be granted . He r ead the list to her. She s aid there would be n o i n j ust ice because there would s till be two single families inhabiting the propert y . She said the property is listed fo r $1 10,000 for both houses. There has been no app raisal, but they are expec ting that the total pric e will remain the same with or wi thout the lot s plit. She said the plight of the owner is the difficulty of finding qualified buyers who can afford to purcha se both houses . She said that splitting the l o ts will not weaken the Ordinance, a nd that, because the home s have been there a long time, there would be no chan ge i n the n eighb o rhood. There were no questions from the Board. There wer e no further speakers either for or against the requ es t. The Chairman asked that the St aff Rep ort be made part of the record. The staff had no further comme nts . Th e Chai rman closed the Public Hearing for Case No . 29 -84. BOARD MEMBER SEYMOUR MOV ED THAT IN CASE NO. 29 -84, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 550 EAST EASTMAN AVENUE AND 3201 SOUTH PEARL STREET, THE APPLICANT BE GRANTED A VARIANCE TO DIVIDE THIS PROPERTY SO THAT EAC H HOUSE ON THE LOT CAN BE SOLD SEPARATELY. THE APPLICANT WOULD BE GRANTED VARIANCES TO PERMIT THE DIVISI ON OF THIS PROPERTY INTO TWO SEPARATE LOTS, PARCEL A AND PARC EL B, EAC H OF WHICH WOULD CONTAIN ONE OF THE EXISTING SINGLE -FAMILY DWELLINGS. THE DIVISION OF THE PROPERTY WOULD REQUIRE THE FOLLOWING VARIANCES: BOTH PARCELS: TO PERMIT TWO DWELLINGS ON ONE LOT IN A SINGLE-FAMILY ZONE DISTRICT. PARCEL A (550 EAST EASTMAN AVENUE): 1 . A REDUCTION IN THE MINIMUM LOT AREA FROM 6,000 SQUARE FEET TO 2 ,350 SQUARE FEET . 2. A REDUCTION IN THE MINDfUM REAR YARD FROM 25 FEET TO 18 FEET. 3 . A REDUCTI ON IN THE FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 13 FEET. 4 . A REDUCTION IN THE MINIMUM SIDE YARD SETBACK FROM 3 FEE T TO 0 FEET . 5. A REDUCTION IN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LOT FRONTAGE FROM SO FEET TO 47 FEET. 6 . A REDUCTION IN THE MINIMUM NUM BER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES FROM THE REQUIRED TWO SPACES TO ONE SPACE. PARCEL B (3201 SOUTH PEARL STREET): 1. A REDUCTION IN THE MINIMUM LOT AREA FROM THE REQUIRED 6,000 SQUARE FEET TO 3 ,900 SQUARE FEET. 2 . A REDUCTION I THE R!'AR YARD SETBACK FROM THE REQUIRED 25 FEET TO 18 FEET. 3. AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE FROM 30% TO 35.89%. 4. A REDUCTION IN THE MINI~fUM REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING FROM TWO PARKING SPACES TO 0 PARKING SPACES. THESE ARE VARIANCES FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 22.4-4 b (1) - PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES; SECTION 22 .4-4 c (2) -MINIMUM AREA OF LOT; SECTION 22 .4-4 e -MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVE RAGE; SECTION 22.4-4 f -MINIMUM FRONTAGE OF LOT; SECTION 22.4-4 h -MINIMUM FRONT YARD; SECTION 22 .4 -4 i -MINIMUM SIDE YARD; SECTION 22.4-4 j (2) -MINIMUM REAR YARD; SECTION 22.4-4 k -MINIMUM OFF- STREET PARKING, WHICH SECTION REFERS TO SECTION 22.5-5 a 10, PRIVATE OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS . • I • • 0 c • • - -4- Board Member Gage second ed th e motion. The votes were locked i n and th e me mb e rs gav e their fi ndings as follows: Mr. Seymour stated that he voted against the variance becau se there was no d emo n s trated hardship and the property can yield a r easonable return without the lot split . The l o ts and th e se tbac k s , as pro posed, are t oo small . Mr. Hallagi n vot e d "no" becau se the lots would be too s ma ll and there were too man y variances require d. There wa s no sid e setback on on e side of the s maller unit. Mr. Brown vo ted "no", saying tha t the smaller house cann ot be bro ught up t o Code without the g ranting of further variances. Mr. Gage voted "no " be ca use g r a nt i ng this variance would mak e the lots too small, and the applicant did not me e t all six cond i tions for g r a nting a variance . Mrs. Dawson voted "no" because there is no t enou gh lot a r ea for two homes. The subject property can be sold as a unit as i ncome property Mr. Fe r g uson voted "no " because the six condition s were not met . The division of the property might s ubs t antially i n j ure the a r ea . Mr. Fish stated the six conditions were not met, a nd a n economic hardship is not a sufficient reason for a variance. When the vot es were displayed, there were sev e n votes o pposed to the granting of the variance , a nd the Chairman ruled that the variance was denied. BOARD MEMBER SEYMOUR MOVED THAT IN CASE NO. 29 -84 , 3201 SOUTH PEARL STRE ET AND 550 EAST EASTMAN AVENUE, THE APPLICANT , JOHN VLASMAN, BE GRANTED A LATE REGISTRA- TION OF A NONCONFO RM ING USE TO PERMIT THE CONTINUE D USE OF TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON A SINGLE LOT . THIS IS A VARIANCE FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE , SECTION 22.6 a AND b, CONTINUANCE OF NONCONFORMING USES. Board Member Gage seconded the motion. The Board locked in the votes and the members gave their findin gs : Mr. Seymour stated that the units have existed for many years; there were no objections from the neighbors, and he voted "yes". Mr. Hallagin voted in favor of the late registration because the unit s have been there since 1940 and they have been continuously used since that time. Mr. Brown voted "yes" because the neighborhood would not be changed since the units have existed for 44 years. Mr. Gage voted "yes" because th re re unique circumstances with having two single-family r sidences on one lot. Mrs. Dawson said that th re are many nonconforming uses in the area, and this will permit th houses to exist legally, but will keep the lot in a single ownership. Mr. Ferguson voted "y s" b caus th requirements for granting a late registration re that th use must have been legal at on time, and that the use be in continuous • I • • I • • • - -5- existence since that time . Mr. Fish said granting the late r egis tratio n wo uld do justice to the ne i gh bo rhood and the applicants; housing is need e d; a nd he conc urred with the o the r members of the Board. There were seven v o tes in favor of grant i ng the late reg istra tion, and th e Chairman ruled that the motio n was GRAN TED. Mrs. Romans said that Mr. Vlasman s hould co ntac t Mrs. Rousses in the Planni ng Division concerning the reg istration of the nonconforming us e and the yea rly required questionnaire . * * * * * The Chairman opened th e Public Hearing on Case No. 31-84. He s t a ted that the Board is authorized t o g rant or deny a variance by Part 3, Section 60 of the Englewood City Charter. He sta ted that he had verification of publication and posting for the case and asked that the s taf f i d e ntify the reque s t. Mrs. Romans said that the applicant, Mary Kring , is requesting a variance for property loca t ed at 4876 a nd 4876~ So uth Lincoln Street, t o permit the continued use of a detached two -family dwelling with no party wall o r common roof. This is a variance from the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance , Section 22.4-5 b (2), Permitted Prin cipal Uses, whi ch requires that a tw o -family dwel ling must have a party wall a nd be under a common roof. The Chairm an asked that the applicant come forwa rd. Mary Kring, 14300 E . Marina Drive #302, came fo r ward and was sworn i n for tes t imo n y . She said that she and her late husband bought the property in 1970 and it had been sold as a rental . She said that in the Staff Report there were s t atements from neighbors stating that the property had been r ented since 1942. She said that the smaller unit provides an inexpensive rental , and there is plenty of off-street parking on th property . The tenants have always been good neighbors, and there have been no problems. They have kept the houses in good condition. It is difficult for her to continue caring for the property, and she would like to sell her property and retire. She had not known that the two separate houses were not legal and needs a late registration to sell her property. She said that she had a buyer who wanted to close on the following day, November 15, 1984. Mr. Hallagin asked if the neighbors approved. Mrs. Kring said that three neighbors signed letters stating that they had no objection to the granting of a variance. There were no further questions from the Board, and no further speakers in favor of the request. The Chairman asked if there were any speakers in opposition to the request. Deborah Weems and Dave Weems, of 4855 South Lincoln Street and Mrs. Lavinia Weems , 4851 South Lin coln Street, were sworn in a nd spoke in opposition to the request. They stated that they live across the street, and feel that t h e neighborhood is deteriorating. They thought that passing this variance would rezone the neighborhood. They did agree that Mrs. Kring had always taken care of the property and t hey had no objections to her renters, but they were afraid t hat future renters a nd owners might be objectionable • • I • • ,. I • • • • -6- Mr. Fish explained that the neighborhood is zoned for two-family use and that the only problem with this property is that the two-family us es are supposed to be attached. Mr. Ferguson stated that these houses could be torn down and replaced with a duplex that would bring the same number of people into the neighborhood. There was no further opposition. BOARD MEMBER BROWN MOVED THAT THE APPLICANT BE GRANTED A VARIANCE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4876 AND 4876~ SOUTH LINCOLN STREET TO PERMIT THE CONTINUED USE OF A TWO-FAMILY USE NOT HAVING A PARTY WALL OR COMMON ROOF. THIS IS A VARIANCE FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 22.4-5 b (2), PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, WHICH REQUIRES THAT A TWO-FAMILY DWELLING MUST HAVE A PARTY WALL AND BE UNDER A COMMON ROOF. Board Member Gage seconded the motion. The Board members locked in their v otes and gave their findings as follows: Mr. Seymour stated that the applicant needs to change her investment profile. The two-family use has been there for many years, and the zoning permits two- family use; therefore he voted "yes". Mr. Hallagin said that he voted "yes" because the conditions were met. The second unit has been there for a long time and there have been no problems. The area is R-2, and this property has not contributed to any deterioration of the neighborhood. Mr. Brown stated that the use was legal at one time, and the continued use has not had an adverse effect on the neighborhood. There were letters supporting this variance. He voted in favor of granting the late registration. Mr. Gage said there is a hardship; the situation has been there for many years; and this will not c hange the neighborhood; therefore, he voted in favor of the late registration. Mrs. Dawson voted "yes" becaus e the area is zoned for medium density ; some of the neighbors approved; and Englewood needs rental units. Mr. Ferguson said he voted "yes" because this would not c hange the character of the neighborhood. The units have been there for over 40 years. Authorizing the registration would not change the neighborhood or weaken the Ordinance. Mr. Fish said that he voted "yes" because the use has been there for many years and because the neighborhood is essentially in compliance with this request. There were seven votes in favor of granting the late registration, and the Chairman ruled that it was GRANTED. The Chairman instructed Mrs. Kring to contact Mrs. Rousses in the Planning Office for instructions concerning Nonconforming Uses. He declared a recess at 8:35 p.m. * * * * * The meeting re convened at 8:45 p.m. All members were present. • I • • • • • - -7- The Chairman opened the Public Hearing fo r Case No . 32-84, stating that the Baord is authorized to grant or deny a varianc e by Part 3, Section 60 of the Englewood City Charter. He said that he had verification of publication and posting for the case, and he asked that the staff identify the request. Mrs. Romans stated that the applicants, Mark Lee Levine, Robert L. Pitler and Kent Jay Levine, have recently purchased the property at 2303 East Dartmouth Avenue a nd are requesting an expansion of a variance g ranted to the previous owner of the subject property, Leonard Chessler, on August 8, 1984 . This variance would change the permitted use from a professional office building for attorneys and a rchitects to an office building for attorneys, architects, engineers and real estate brokers. This is a variance from the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Section 22.4-2 b, Permitted Principal Uses. The Chairman asked that the representative for the applicants come forward for testimony . Robert L. Pitler, 1150 Delaware Street, Denver, came forward and was sworn in. He stated the property was purchased for the use of their law firm and real estate compa ny . They specialize in real estate law; all of the partners are both lawyers and real estate brokers o r associate brokers. They work for both the law firm and the brokerage company. He said he was asking for a slight expansion of the variance. He said it is difficult to have an architecture company without also having engineers because most architects are engineers or they staff engineers. This would not damage the neighborhood o r substantially affect the traffic pattern. Mr. Pitler said that the majority of the real estate activity planned for this structure will be in the a dministrative aspect . The administrative staff will be located on that property. The difference would be slight and could not be d tected; but, he said, his firm wished to begin its residency in Englewood on good terms with the neighbors and the City, and, therefore, requested the varianc . The main selling wo rk for the real estate section will b located at the 1150 Delaware Street property. Most of the work done on th Dartmouth property will be don on phones, although there will be some clients wh o will go to the Dartmouth property. Mr. Pitler said the neighborhood would not be affected by the change from the original variance. He stated it would be unjust of the Board to close off his firm's use and to require it to separate the real estate aspect of the business from the legal aspect. Mr. Pitler said that the existing variance was granted to improve the neighborhood. The property has been an eyesore for several years. This variance would permit the owners to landscape and restore the property, and this would benefit the neighborhood. He said that the house is divided from th residential part of the neighborhood, and the offices will not generate the traffi c which the c hurch generates. He said the house is unique and will be an artistic statement . • I • • • • • - -8- Mr. Pitler s aid tha t the own e r s p l a n t o work wi th th e s t aff a nd me et th e staf f 's r e quests fo r drainage a nd lands ca p i n g . Th ey will imp rove the b e rm i f the varia nce i s g rante d. He s a id th e p r o p e rt y i s u niqu e becau se of i t s size a nd l oca tio n. Mr. Pi tl e r stated that there will n o t b e mu c h traffic g ene rat e d by th e law a n d r e al estat e business . He s a id th a t there would no t be of fi ce hour s a t n ight; a nd , although members o f the firm's staff would occa siona l l y wo rk at n ight it would seldom be past 9:00. He s a i d the noise leve l would be l ower tha n i f th e h ou se were used as a sing le-f amily residenc e, and th a t the firm wou l d wo rk wi th th e s t a ff and the neig hbo rs t o e nsure that a goo d parking plan would be f o llowed. He stated that the extension o f the varian c e would n o t we a ken the Ordinance b ecaus e the change would be slight. He said it would not harm the n e i g hb o rh oo d bec ause the house is not in a r es idential are a bec au se it is n e xt t o the c hurc h. Mr. Pitler des c ribed h is f irm, a nd s a id th ey wer e a n o ld e s t ab l ish ed a nd respec t e d law prac t ice . Mr. Ferguson asked if Mr. Pitler was aware of the c ond i t ions a tta c hed t o the original varianc e. Mr. Pitler s aid he was awar e of th e m. He s a id the s ew e r c ovenant had also been cons i dered aft e r they purc ha sed the pro pe rt y on Oc t o ber 16, 1984. Mr. Seymo ur stat e d that the ho us e is re a lly a p a rt of the resident ia l n e i ghb o r- h ood and wo uld be affe c t e d by traf fic go ing eas t o n Da rtmou th. Mr. Br own qu e st ion e d Mr. Pit l er's p l an fo r th e be rm a nd th e land scap i n g . Mr. Pitler s aid they wo u l d h i r e a n a r c h i t ec t wh o specia l izes i n l and scaping , wh o , wi th the City st aff a nd th e ne ighb orhoo d, will mee t t o d ecid e wh a t should b e d one. Mr. Halligin r efe rre d t o the sewe r an d c ur b a n d gutter , a n d ask ed wha t Mr. Pi tle r was planning t o d o . Mr. Pitler said h e wou l d follow the direc t ion of the Ci t y s ta f f. Mr. Fe r guson ask e d the St aff if n egotia t ion s have been ma de wi th Mr. Pitle r on t hese mat t ers . Mrs. Roma n s said that the staff has ma d e Mr. Pitler a wa r e of the r equ i r eme n ts . All t he conditions of th e pr e v iou s v a r i ance were r ecord e d alon g wi th t he cond i t ion s of t he o r iginal d ivision of th e p r ope rty . She said that th e r e ha s been ever y i nd ica t ion tha t Mr. Pitle r will coo pe rat e rega r din g land scapin g a nd curb , gutte r and sidewalk . Mr. Ferguson asked if there would be an easing of the sewer r equ i r emen t. Mr s . Romans said it woul d be considered when the property to the north is developed . Mr. Fish asked why brokers and engineers cannot work under attorneys and architects under the present variance. Mr. Pitler said his business cannot be divided . He has support staff that operates only the real esta t e part of the business. He said that they would not be able to rent to an architect if there are engineers on the staff. Ms . Reid, Assis t a n t City Attorney , stated that it would be better to gran t o r deny this variance to permit or forbid the expansion . She said that the o r ig inal variance would permit t he brokerage to operate only as it relates to Mr. Pitler 's being an attorney. Mr. Ferguson said that permitting engineers and real estate brokers and agent s will permit engineers to hire surveyors, who can hire a nother profession. Mr. Pitler said that this would not happen; he suggested that the building be granted a varianc to permit the b u ilding to be called a professional office building. • I • • • • • - -9- Mr. Seymour said that the previous variance excluded engineers. He also pointed out that if Mr. Pitler sells the building, the next owner may expand the engineering staffs . He said that the first variance was granted in a very limited way because they wanted to reduce the impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Seymour called Mr. Pitler's attention to the second requirement on the previous variance which would not permit working on the property after normal office hours. Mr. Pitler said that lawyers have normal working hours at night. Mr. Pitler said he did not think this provision applied to an attorney working alone in his office at night. He said this would not hurt the neighborhood or violate the letter or the spirit of the Ordinance. Mr. Seymour said this provision was a trade-off with the neighbors, in that, if this condition was made, the neighbors would not object so much to the granting of the variance . Mr. Pitler said that most of the time people would not be working late. Mr. Ferguson asked how many offices would be in the house. Mr . Pitler said they would use all the rooms as offices , whi c h would make ten offices. Mr. Ferguson said that this property is in a residential zone. The Board allowed a business to move into a residential area. There will be 10 offices with a minimum of 20 cars. This is a substantial increase in cars and traffic from that of a single-family residence. The Board limited the office hours to day hours to limit the impact on the neighborhood . Working at night will bring new lights and traffic into the neighborhood, and the Board intended to limit that. Mr. Pitler said this purpose can be accomplished and still eliminate the eyesore that is presently on that property. Mr. Brown asked if the variance would pass with the property if it is sold. Mrs. Romans said that it would, unless the variance contains a provision that it will go only with one owner . Mr. Pitler said that the conditions would also go with the variance to the new owners. There were no further questions. The Chairman asked if there were any other speakers in favor of the variance. Kent Jay Levine, 3121 South Josephine , c ame forward and was sworn in for testimony. He said he is a partner in the law corporation and a real estate broker. He teaches real estate primarily at Red Rocks Community College. He said that there is a great deal of overlap between the law firm and the real esta t e brokerage firm. He said that real estate brokers may not work in an area that does not permit real estate work. This is the reason they coul d not simply work under the attorneys at this location. He said that the real estate business done at the Dartmouth address would be mostly administrative. Most client s will go to the Delaware address. He said that the car count at the subject property will be minimal. The daily count of ca rs going by on Dartmouth is about 5 ,000 and the real estate firm 's impa c t on that will be small. The Chairman asked if Mr. Levine would be teaching at the Dartmouth office. Mr. Levine said he would not be teaching there. He said that even if all th ir business were done at the Dartmouth office , there would not be much more traffic, because much of the work is done outside the office. Th Chairman asked if there were any other speakers in favor of the request. Lynne Starnes, 7771 West Quarto Drive, Littleton, came forward and was sworn in for testimony. She stated that she is the business manager for the law firm and she works in the accounting part of the real estate firm. She said most of her work is done on the phone and with the clients of the law firm • I • • • • • .. - -10- Ms. Starnes does occasionally work at night, usually not beyond 9:00. There would only be one or two cars after normal office hours. Val Newcombe, 1282 South Vance Street, Lakewood, was sworn in for testimony. She stated that if the law firm had to be kept separate from the real estate business, much time would be wasted travelling back and forth, and her work time would be increased. Sue Roybal, 2652 South Holland Street, Lakewood, came forward and was sworn in for testimony. She said that she is a legal assistant with the real estate part of the business. She said there would not be a lot of traffic, and most of the traffic that would be there would be connected with the law firm. She said there would not be much parking at the building as there is already a car pool which has been organized. Joan McAllister, 888 Logan #3H, Denver, came forward and was sworn in. She said that she is in the administrative real estate section and works with attorneys, approving bills and talking on the phone. She must have close contact with the attorneys. Statements arrive by mail. There would be little traffic, and she could 4~ot imagine any harm her work at the property would do to the neighborhood. ~ Deni Weaver, 7449 West Fremont Avenue, Littleton, was sworn in for testimony. She said that she is a real estate assistant and meets clients at the properties. She is in a car pool. Mr. Fish asked how often she deals with engineers and architects and attorneys. Ms. Weaver said she works mostly with the three attorneys. Janet Perlstein, 2685 South Dayton Way #112, Denver, was sworn in for testimony. She said she is a lawyer who works for the firm of Levine and Pitler. She works closely with both Joan McAllister and Deni Weaver. They are the property managers, and she needs constant contact with them to do her job. Mr. Pitler said he had no more evidence. Chairman Fish said he would give Mr. Pitler a chance for rebuttal after any opposition had been heard. The Chairman asked if there were any speakers in opposition to the granting of the variance. Frank Velzen, 2270 East Columbia Place, Denver, came forward and was sworn in for testimony. He stated that he spoke in opposition to the original variance, and he was opposing the extension in a qualified manner. He said that at the first meeting he had been afraid that there would be further requests for further variances. He said he was concerned about enforcing the conditions on the property in the future and whether future owners would obey the conditions. He listed some of his concerns: Condition #2 of the original variance stated "the re-use may not generate a high volume of traffic and the use shall be operated during regular daytime office hours during the work week." He asked what the regular daytime office hours would be and if night work violates this condition. Under Condition #3, "off-street parking shall be provided on site to the north of the house to minimize visability by the people on the west and shall be screened." Mr. Velzen said that off-street parking on the north will create problems in terms of lights shining into the neighbors' homes, and he would like specific terms added to the variance . • I • - • • • • -11- Mr. Velzen said that the condition concerning the removal of the berm on the west side of the property and landscaping and drainage, should be further researched and possibly expanded to the north and east sides o f the building. He asked that the berm be designed so it can be maintained properly, that trees be planted to prevent headlights from shining into the houses to the north of the property, and that the drainage problem be handled when landscaping problems are addressed. He asked that the edge of the parking lot be kept at least 50 feet from the west and north property lines, and limited on the north side to avoid affecting the residential flavor of the neighb oring properties. He suggested parking for clients on the east side of the b u ilding close to the lot line by the RTD parking facilities, and that the landscaping plans be shared with the neighboring residents before they are approved. Mr. Velzen said that if these modifications are included in the variance, the residents he has talked with would not oppose the variance, although he does question engineers' being added to the building. He said that if a new brokerage firm entered the building, they might not be as limited as far as clients are concerned as the Levine-Pitler firm is. The Board discussed conditions for the variance. Harold Bremers, M.D., 2292 East Dartmouth Avenue, came forward and was sworn in for testimony. He stated that he would like this property limited to archi- tects and attorneys who would be permitted to work only during regular daytime work week hours. He objected to people going there at night, although if it is strictly for work, it might be all right. There were no further speakers in opposition to the request. The Chairman made the Staff Report part of the Record, and the Staff had no further comme nts. The Chairman closed the Public Hearing. After discussing various conditions to be attached to the variance, the Board decided to continue the case t o the next meeting to be held at 7:30 p.m. on December 12, 1984. Sheryl ;g;;sses, Recording Secretary I . • • • ,. - CIT Y OF ENGLEWOOD PLAN NING AND ZONING COMMISSIO N De cembe r 4 , 1 984 I . CAL L TO ORDER. 9 " { Th e re gular me e ting of the City Plannin g and Zoning Comm i s s i on was called to o rd e r by Chairma n McBra ye r at 5:30 p .m. in Con f erence Room A. Me mber s pres ent: Carson, St o el, Barbre , Ve n ard, Tanguma, Ma gnuso n an d McBra ye r. Romans, As sistan t Directo r of Communit y Dev e l opm ent. Me mber s absent : Becker and Allen. Also pre s ent: Susan T. Kin g , Senior Planne r Walt Gr o ditski, Code Adm i ni s tra t o r Jack Olsen, City Attorney II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. No vemb e r 20, 1984 Cha irma n Mc Braye r s tated that the Mi nut es of Nove mb e r 20, 1 98 4 , we r e t o be consider ed f o r a pprov al . Carson moved : Sto el s eco nd e d: Th e Mi nutes of Nov emb e r 20 , 19 84 , b e ap proved a s wr it t en. AYES: NAYS : ABSTA I N: ABSENT : III. Ca r son, St oe l, Barbre, Ve nard , Tan guma . No ne . Ma gnu son and Mc Braye r. Be c k e r and Al len . COMPREHEN SIVE ZOKING ORDINANCE. Mr . Gr odit s k i s ug gested some change s i n the pro pos ed revi sio n s t o Sec t ion 16.2 of t h e Zon ing Ordinanc e . He asked t h at the sec t ion b e b ro ught int o con forma n ce wi th t he Buildin g and F i r e Codes . He sug ge sted that a s ec t ion b e ad ded s t at ing "fo r pur poses of en fo r c e ment of th is ord i na n ce , the Di r ec tor a nd hi s d es i gn ees s h all h ave t he po we r s of a law e n forcemen t officer ." Mr . Ca r son ob j e c ted t o grant i n g such p o w e~s t o an i n spe c tor, es peciall y search powers. Mr. Grod i t ski sai d that there are n o sea r c h power s g r a nted t o law enfo r c ement officers , wh o mu s t obtain sear c h war r ant s , j u s t a s in spect o r s h ave t o d o i f ac c es s i s d enied . Mr. Groditski said t hat i t woul d be impossible t o f i n d zo n i ng v i o l ati o ns a n d co nst r uc ti on wo r k do n e wi t hout permi t s if n o ''righ t of e ntry" we r e given t o t he inc;pe c t o r s . Mr . Olsen said the Zo ning Or din a n ce ca nnot b e e n forc d if "r ight of ent r v" is no t inc lud ed . Mr . Tang uma a s k ed the di f f e r e n c e b e twee n "right t o tres pa ss " and "righ t of e ntry ". Mr . Gr o d i t ski sai d tha t ins p ec t o r s wou l d no t a c tually b e tre s pa s s i n g becau se th ey would h av a rig ht t o be on the pro p rt y . Th e wo rd t r espas s is offen 5 ive, moreov er , a nd they wer s ugg e s t i ng tha t "righ t t o tres pas s " be change d t o "ri ght of entry ". Mr. St oe l sa id t ha t th r pr sent a tives o f the Direc tor sho uld no t be c alled "his r pres entat i v es " an d s ugges ted "a r e presentative" or an "an autho rized repre s e nt a tive". Mr . Gr o d i t s k i s ugges t d the f ol l owin g n e w wo rdin g f o r the s e c tio n on Certifi c ate o f O cupancy: "A f t r th eff c t iv d a t of this o rdina n c , o r a ny am e ndm e nt h e reto , a Ce rt ifi c at of Occ u pan y sha l l b i ssu e d f o r a ll buil d ingb a nd pr o p rt y when t her • I • • • • - MINUTES ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD December 11, 1984 Chairman Jerry Valdes called the regular meeting of the Library Advisory Board to order at 7:36 p.m. PRESENT: REGRETS; ALSO PRESENT: Jerry Valdes, Bruce Hogue, John Peterson, Al Quaintance Gerald Sampson, Kay Van Valkenburg, Dorothy Wheelehan Lois Sterling, Debbie Dix Sharon Winkle, Director of Libraries Donna Gottberg, Recording Secretary There were no committee reports. Fou r Board members and Ms. Winkle attended the Joint Arapahoe County Library Board Meeting of November 19, 1984 with Ms . ll'heelehan giving a capsule report. The next Joint Board Meeting will be Monday, February 11, 1985, hosted by Arapahoe Regional Library District. Mr. Valdes reminded the Board of the election of officers to be held at the January meeting. Mr. Valdes turned the meeting over to Ms . Sharon Winkle for the Director's Report. 9t Ms. Winkle announced the request from the Joint Board that a member of Englewood Public Library's Board join Bill Grace and Joyce Lottner in forming a committee to evaluate the County's FY 1985 contract with Denver Public Library for walk-in library services. Mr. Valdes volunteered to serve on that committee. There was discussion on the Metropolitan Library District (MLD). Ms. Winkle gave a brief update regarding the Metropolitan Library District and the Arapahoe County contract for FY 1985. A letter from Mr. Dick Akroyd of DPL was discussed (copy attached). After further discussion the Board felt the figure of $245,000 was valid. Jefferson County does not plan to participate in the contract with Denver. The current contract between Arapahoe County and Denver expires December 31, 1984. 84-27 ~tOTION: The Board highly recommend s that the County Commissioners of Arapahoe County enter into an agreement with Denver Public Library in the interest of providing continued service to County residents. Moved by: John Peterson Seconded by; Al Quaintance Motion carried. Ms. Winkle gave an update on the building program. Mr. David Smith, the Library Building Consultant, plans to be in Englewood on Friday, December 14 to meet with the City's architectural firm. There will be a discussion of space planning and sharing and also expansion possibilities. continued .... • I • • • • • - -2 - is a n } c hange in the type of use of the pro pert y , .1ny c hang e in th e t yp e of use of a n e xi s ting building as defined in the Englewood Build i n g Co de , a nd p rio r t o t he use o r o cc upan cy of a n e ;. b uild i ng . The c~r tifi cate of Occ up a n cy s h all be posted in a cocd pic u o•1 s place o n r he p r e mi s es a nd s hall no t b e r e moved e x c ept bv the Directo r o f CoMl!l u n ity Deve ·opme nt o--a n au t ho r i .;ed r ep r esent at i v e ." Mr. Gn-..d i tiski s1id they would b e enfo r c ing th e pos ti n,:; o f t ' Ce rti fic ate of Occu p ancy i n a ll p u bli c buildin gs . Ir. Mc Brave r s t t ed that si1g le-fami lv a nd two-f mily res i denc ~ s ho uld be s pecific ally L.cmpt f r om t h e posli ng r eq ui r em n c . ~1rs . Roma ns s t. ,gested a S..i tu rday Study Ses sion wit Rick De l l t c an d Jack : sen on January 12 , i u3 5 , a t 8:00 a.m . The Co mmissio n ag r eed. ~!r. Gn-..ditski a n d Mr . Olsen left the meetin i!, a nd Mr . Allen e ntere d . ~r . Ve nard r equested tha t ec tion 16. be tabled wi i.l e h e obtains copies o f the Ar v ad a nd \./hea t r idge o rd inan c es. The Commissi o n ;;reed . The C mmission c onsidered Section 16.5, General Reg ula tions. Mr. Tanguma questioned the i n c lusion o f des criptions of permi ssib le parking lo t surfaces. Mrs. P ma ns sa id t hat it wa s a des •r ip tion o f materials the De par tme n t of En gineering >e rv ices would r e quire . The Comnissio n asked tha t the word "dust" be changed t .:i "d irt". ~I r. Mc Braye r a s ked that provi sio n s fo r the p arking o f three-wh e eled v hicles be ma de fo r senio r c itizen LO mplexes . On pa e 19, line 22 , th e f r nt yn rd setback sho uld be chan g ed to 15 fee t it into c onformance wi th t ne r es t o f the r e J"ised Ordinance . b ring The Comm i;sion a ske d ,1a t the vis ibility tria n g le J esc r ibed in the Fe nce Ordinanc e be app lie d to the front a nd side ya rd setbacks o n co rne r lo t s. A t y po g raphical error was fo und on page 20, l ine 21; and o n page 33 the Pl .. nin g Commissio n wa s designated as t he reviewing b o d y f o r the a daptive reuse 0 f h 'sto r ical buildings , v acated s cho ols , e tc . ~!rs . Ro mans explcined the c hang e s made in Sec t i o n 16 .6 , Nonconforming Uses . She stated tha t t he P l anning Commission meeting on Dec emb er 18 would cover the de finitio n sec tio n o f t he Zoning Ordinance. She sugges ted set ting a date late in January o r ea rl y in Febr "a ry for -he ublic H ~arin ~ on the Zo ning Ordinance . rv . DIRECT (' ... s CH OICE. ~!rs . Romans said there had been some changes in the Dy er-Hamburg Subdivision Waiver and explained t e changes . The Commission approved the c hang es. \'. COM~1IS ::i [Q NERS I CHOIC E. No o ne had a ny commen t s . Th e ~eting a djourned a~ 8:0 5 p.m. ~,~;P~ sheryl~es Record ing Se c ret ry • I • • t - • • - -2- At the Board's request a letter will be drafted to the Mayor inviting City Council to a dinner February. Director's Choice Hank Long (formerly of Aurora Public Library) has been appointed to the position of Library Services Administrator and began work at EPL on December 3. Ms. Arlene Smith, Library Aide, has resigned as of 'ovember 30, and is moving to California. She will be replaced with two part-time workers, Is. Kathy Kolenc, former Page, and Ms. Joy Perez, who will begin work on December 17. The Request for Proposal for the Security System should be ready for mailing by the end of this week. Proposals are due by the end of January for evaluation in February. Ir. Mark Thomas , Adult Services Manager, is now in charge of all public service microcomputers in the Library. A reminder that the Children's Tree Trimming party wil 1 be held December 17 at 7:00 p.m. Karen Kelley, Children's Services Manager will be in charge. Ms. Kelley has a display in the foyer of the Library from the Tell and Draw Programs of this Fal 1. Since the "Suggestion Book" has been replaced by individual comment forms from the patrons, only two suggestions/comments have been made. It was suggested that both methods of communication with the public could be operated in tandem. Members' Choice Mr. Valdes commented that the efforts on the part of the Reference staff to find a book for him were commendable. Ms . Wheelehan brought up an old and ongoing complaint. The parking problem, especially at this time of year, is grave. She noted one day there were 47 employee cars plus several City trucks parked in the north parking lot, thus leaving limited space for Library patrons. She feels circulation will drop because of the lack of parking. Ms. Winkle noted that in the planning of the new facility there will be space for 200 cars underground plus 50 surface spaces. She further noted that the parking problem wil 1 be addressed in great depth for the new facility. Ms . Wheelehan asked that this problem be put on the agenda for further d iscu ss ion a nd possible action in the near future . Ms . Winkle noted that the Library plan s to have the book drop open 24-hour s a day to help patrons drop off book s wi thout having to park. Mr. Quaintance asked if the Library c ould have an Amne s ty Time, po ssi bl y fr om now to the end of the year. Ms . Winkl e 's reply was that it was too late to a dv e rti se s uc h a plan now, but s he was planning on suc h a time later when we go on -line and possibly at the opening of the new fa c ility. Ir. Quaintanc e suggested flower s for the staff from the Board as Chri s tmas decor - ations. The Board agreed and asked Ms. Gottberg to purchase the flower s or plant s . continued .... • I • • • • • • -3- ( Ms. Van Valkenburg asked if there was a way staff could be identified, such as name placards. There was a brief discussion regarding the pros and cons of such a step. Ms. Winkle said she would discuss this with her staff. Mr. Hogue asked for an updated list of s taff members and their positions. Ms. Winkle noted there would be a new one soon, since all positions at the Library have now been filled. Mr. Hogue asked if the patron filing the Reque s t for Reconsideration of Library Materials in October had pursued it further. Ms. Winkle stated there was no formal follow up. Mr. Valdes suggested that the Unfinished Business of the Job Description for Board Members be tabled until the February meeting . The Statistical Report for November 1984 was briefly discussed. Mr. Quaintance asked if he could have a breakdown of the circulation on the Bookmobile by adult and juvenile. 84-29 MOTION: That the Minutes from the November 14, 1984 Meeting be approved as written. Moved by: Al Quaintance Seconded by : Gerald Sampson Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:23 p.m. 12-13-84 dg • I • • I • • • - f' ....... ---1/ "\( ·-· ·.,,....&' • , ..... I r• :-·1 !·~~::.; L!:J1 ~ry ---------------------------------- R 1c.1.•rr1 G t. ... t-•o y d . J r. A r 1np C1 1v L 1:-i r ari •n 30.:. ~7 1 73 80 r:o ,:m!.l e r 21 , 198 4 De a r Tom : Mr . Th om as R. [o oe rt Board o f Cou nty -Co mm is s ion ers 5 334 So uth Pr i nce Stre et Littleton, Colora do 80166 1.JS7 ,.., • .,.,.._., o ... , .... t ou ... a c. H u .~01i 1 6 !> J0 .11 ~n JOOO Tha nk y o u f o r y o ur let ter of Oc t ob e r 30 r ega rd i ng a contin ue d contr ac t h l lh the Lib -ary for se r vice s in 198 5 . Le t me t ry to c l ea r up a ny c o nfu si on whi ch may t-.ave be en rau s e d by my lett e r of Oc tob e r JO. The du a l c o st s we r e in c l ude d to r e fle c t my se nse o f U1e d i s - c ussi on a t t he ORCO G MLD Ta sk Fo r ce mee ting on Au9ust 15 . As y o u will r e c a ll, we a l l a5 r e ed t o r e all oc ate t he c o s ts f o r ea c h co J nt y's part ic ipati on i n ~L O in 198 5 r ase d u po n t he p 2 r c ent ~g es i or 'Lhe ldst ful 1 ,::-a r i n h'hic h J r-f ii::-· so n Coun t y h;,d a cc ess to t he Cen ·cra l Li br ary . l ha t ye ar h c S 198 3. The E ffc-ct o f th i s woul d be to l owe r th e cost s for a l l oth e r coun t ies s i nce Je ffer son ha d a h igher percen tage o f use i n 1983 than t he Grif f i t hs study f ig ur e s indicat e d. I i ncluded t he t wo cost f i gures . in my let t e r in orde r t o demo n st r a t e t he i~~a c t of that reall o cation . You are co r r ect , of cours e , i n pointi ng out t ha t wi t ho ut Jeffe r s o n Cou nty's par t i cipa tio n i n 198 5 , Ara pahoe Cou nty's cos t s s ho uld be l o1 e r tha n t he }2 3 ,465 .DO quot e d in my l e tter. You r <!ssum ption i s co r rect t hat tha t figu re reflec ts th e Griffith s s t ud y r e ald own plu s t he a ddi t ion al S40D,0 00 .00 wh i ch he fel t was no t p rope r l y talen i n to a c c ount . lo be very spec i f ic , t he 5283 ,G65 00 is 13 .9i o f 52,0 02,587.00 (the CRC co~t o f Sl,6 0 2 .~67 f r um t he Augus t 2, 1984 Griff i t hs stu dy, plus 5400 ,000 .00 ). The c o st f i gu re of $154,790 .0D f o r Ara pohoe Cou nty in 1985 l'.'111 ol d, t .. ne r, on ly 1f J e ff e rso n Co unty deci de s to c ont r a c t wi th us fo r 'Ervices i n J~ss. Sin c e H .e y hove n o 1~ i11d i cated th;,t they do rio t ir.:e nd t o cc.n:1 c c t h i t h us , I fee l no ob l i gat i o n t o use t he 1983 pe 1rcn t age s agr ee d upo n i n t he MlD Tc:s l. r orc e me !t i ng . Ra t he r, I f ee l t hat I mu~t use t he 198 4 pe rc e nta ge data include d i n t he Gri ff iths s t udy , si nce th i s re f l ects t he r.0s t dCCll rat e en d mo t c urr ~n t d a t a fo r us e o f t he r e n tr a l Lib rdry by a ll u f t he-co un t ie s E>(f pt J e ff r son and Do ugl ds c ou ntie s . Sin c e th r se f i gu r s we re 1n1tia l ly r a lculate d, we ha ve re cci \e d a r e v ise d <.tud y fr t Gr iff i t hs, dd t <d Oct ohe r 11, 193 4 , \., ich st.01-.·s t he cr.c co s t t o be S l,'1 /?.720 . I c un t i nl!C t o t•n •e 't 1e 1cs u ·1ot 1Un s c out t ~ . ., G11f11;h s t udy , H'.ic h co11r t:1n tt.e u<.e o r1 d ir.t E 1p rc•tct H•n of Clu r d ~ta c l•d 11 u t t i.e • I • • - :.:.(-.;,e r l'l, 1984 r .. .,:r.as P.. tgge rt r n ge l' - • • • me thodology. These reservations aside, I will accept the revised Griff i ths stu dy costs for the purpose of calculating 1985 CRC costs. My calculation of cost for Arapahoe County, then, will be based upon the follow i ng: CRC cost per Griffiths study: Additional DPL costs: Total CRC costs: Douglas County costs per Griffi ths study: Jefferson County costs per Griffiths study: Total adjusted CRC costs: ~rapahoe County costs @13 .9%: $1,472,000.00 400,000.00 $1,872,000 .00 (6,DOD .00) (102,000.00) Sl,764,000 .'00 $ 2 ~ :, ' l 96 . 00 hope this will serve to clarify the points which you reised in res ponse t o my earlier letter, and to give you a mo re accurate indication of y our costs for 1985. Pl e ase feel fr ee to contact me if you wish further i~for mat ion. Ve ry truly yours , Ri chard G. A~eroyd, Jr. Ac t ing City Librarian c: Tom Nicholas, Aurora P.L. Judy Ellis, Director RGA: l c Bemis Public Library 6014 S . Datura St. Littleton, CO 80120 Sharon Winkle, Director/ Englewood Public Library 3400 S. Elati St . Englewood, CO 80110 Eloise Fasold, Asst . Dir. Arapahoe Library District 2305 E. Arapahoe Road, SG Plaza Littleton, CO. 80122 I . r • ( • ENGLEWOOD DoWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3535 s. She!mc>'l Slreet Engiowood, Colofodo 80110 Phone 3031 781 -7865 • • • MEMO TO: Mayor Otis and Members of City Council FROM: Penny Dietrich, Executive Director, EDDA DATE: December 12, 1984 SUBJECT: 1985 BUDGET FOR THE ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMFN'.!" AUTHORITY Per the State of Colorado Statutes, Part 8, Downtown Development Authorities, it is stated in 31-25-816 that "The Authority shall adopt a budget for each fiscal yea r ...•.•• Administrative review of the pro- posed budget shall be in accordance with the policies of each municipality, prior to submission of tl1,;-proposed budget to the governing body for approval." I have attached the EDDA 1985 budget for your approval. As you will note, the budget is very detailed and conservative. Three specific line items, ~rinting, Outside; Technical and Professional Services; and Contingency have been broken out into the specific projects (Page Three) that are directly related to the 1985 Work Program as presented to the City Council in October. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. I look forward to a very prosperous and productive yea r in 1985. • 9 I • • • • • • • ENGLEWOOD D~ITOWN DEVELOPMENT AlrrHORITY 3535 S. Sherman -Englewood, CO 80110 Proposed ~ Budget ESTIMATED REVENUES: Property Tax Specific Ownership Tax Penalty and Interest on Delinquent Tax Interest Earnings Total Revenues: EXPENDITURES: Salaries: Salary, Director, full t ime Salary, Sec retary, Flex Time Pensions and Retirement: ICMA Social Security Insurance: AD & D Health Insurance Long Term Disabil i t y Dental In s urance Office Suoplies: General Off ice Books Postage Paper Printing -City Printing -Outside Food Film Miscellaneous Professional Services: Audit County Collection Legal Technical and Professional • $139,660 11,000 125 9,000 $159,785 $ 26,000 5,000 2 ,300 280 1,600 100 400 800 150 900 150 1,000 4,100 800 200 200 1,000 2,800 3,500 46 ,550 _, ' I - • • • • • Proposed 1985 Budget Page Two Expenditures Education and Travel: Travel and COnference Registration Mileage (includes car allowance) Tuition and Training Memberships and Dues Communication and Utilities: Advertising Telephone Electrical and Gas Bills Water and Sewer Rental: ~~~Buildi ng Rental Office Equipment Rental ~air and Maintenance: $ iiOO 1,800 700 100 2 ,400 800 300 7,000 1,200 Office Equipment Repair and Maintenance 100 Aid to Other Agencies and Programs: Aid to Other Agencies and Programs Miscellaneous Expenses: Land Mortgage Interest Insurance Contingency Land (Principal -Sachter Property) TOTAL EXPENDITURES: • 500 3,000 1,600 3S;4oo 3,255 $159,785 I • • - : • • • • ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3535 S. Sherman -Englewood, CO 80110 1985 Work Program -Projects BUDG!:T Printing Landscaping Sachter Payment Promotion/Downtown Parade/Adver/Promotion $ 500 Newsletter 600 Calendar 2,000 Promotion/Grants 1,000 Banners Rewards/Facade Retail Merchandising Colo. Bus. Magazine Slide Show Farmers' Market Board Education TOTAL $4 p 100 • Technical/ Professional $20,000 500 1,200 2,500 3,000 200 800 15,000 650 1,200 1,500 $46,550 Contingency $23,400 15,000 $38,400 :/ I • • • • • • C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE AGENDA ITEM l\F INITIATED BY LIBRARY ADYISORY BOARD SUBJECT LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD ORGANIZATIONAL PROCEDU RES ACTION PROPOSED Coun c il r eceiv e as i n fo r mation INTRODUCTION: Due to the recent a mendme nt to Englewood Municipal Code which removed the requirement that the Board meet on the first Tuesday in February of each year for the purpose of electing its officers, t he Board at its meeting of November 13, 1984, adopted the attached Procedures effect ive Januar y I, 1985. RECQl.~1ENDED ACTION: Counci l review and receive as information. • I • • • • • • ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD LIBRARY BOARD ORGANIZATIONAL PROCEDURES OFFICERS OF 1HE BOARD AND THEIR DUTIES: Chai rman -prepares monthly meeting agenda with Library Director. -conducts the monthly Library Advisory Board ~le eting . -calls special Library Board meetings when needed. -appoints c ommittee s of Board members as needed. -appears in the community as the Board's representative. -attends annual American Library Association Conference if funding is provided by City Council. May appoint a lternate representat ive. -other duties as appropriate. Vice-Chairman -fulfills duties of absent chairman. -is willing to become c hairman after 12 months. -other duties as appropriate. ANNUAL ELECTIO OF OFFICERS The annual election of officers shall occur at the regular January meeting of the Library Advisory Board, with new officers assuming their responsibilities ( at the regular February me eting . Adopted: Effective: November 13, 1984 January 1, 1985 • I • • (f ( ( • .. ORDINAOCE NO. I ----SERIES OF 1985 • • • BY AlJrHORITY COUOCIL BILL NO. 66 INTRODOCED BY COUOCIL MFMBER BRAOOHAW AN ORDINAOCE APPROVING A SEWER EASEMENI' AGREEMENT WITH FUBLIC SERVICE CCMPANY TO INSTAIL A GAS SERVICE LINE TO THE NEW PORTION OF THE ENQ.EWOOD W~ATER TREA'IMENT PLAN!'. WHEREAS, it is necessary to expand the wastewater Treatment Plant sludge handling facilities; and WHEREAS, PUblic Service Canpany requires an easement to install a gas serv ice line to the new portion of the Englewood wastewater Treatment Plant; ~. 'lliEREFORE, BE IT ORDl\INED BY THE CITY COUOCIL OF THE CITY OF EN:il.EWOOD, COLORAOO, AS FO~S: Section 1. There is hereby approved the attached easanent for Public Service Canpany to install a gas service line to a new portion of the Englewood wastewater Treatment Plant expansion. Said easement is incorporated herein and mooe a part hereof by reference. Section 2. City CollllCil authorizes the Mayor to sign and the ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer to attest said easanent for and on behalf of the City Council and the City of Englewood. Introduced , read in full , and passed on first reading on the 17th day of Decanber , 1984. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 19th day of Decanber, 1984 . Read by title and passed on final reading on the 7th day of January, 1985. 9 6 Published by t i tle as Ordinance No. ___ , Series of 1985 , on the 9th day of January, 1985. Attest: Ellgene L. Otis, Mayor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer • I • • - ( f ' • ( • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, COlorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. , series of 1985. Gary R. Higbee I • • • ( ( • - GRANT OF E'.AS™ENT THIS GRANT of a utility easement (this "Grant") is made this day of , 198 by the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, a Colorado municipal corporation, ("Granter") whose address is 3400 S. Elati Street, Englewood, Colorado 80110, in favor of PUBLIC SERVICE Ca1PANY OF COLORAOO, ("Grantee") whose address is 550 15th Street, Denver, CO 80202-4205. The parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. Easement Property. The "Easement Property" shall mean the real property located in the City of Englewood, County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, more particularly described as: Carmencing at the Northwest corner of the NE 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Section 33 , Township 4 South, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian; thence s. 00o07'00" E, along the West line of said NE 1/4 NE 1/4, a distance of 531.35 feet ; thence N. 87o41'58" Ea distance of 304.22 feet to the point of beginning; thence S. 00o07'00" E. a distance of 488.56 feet to the point of terminus. The easement is 10 feet in width. '!tie side boundary lines of the easement shall be lengthened and shortened as necessary to encanpass a continuous strip of not less than the above width at all points on Grantor's property crossed by the above described centerline . 2. Consideration. As consideration for this Grant, Grantee shall pay to Granter the sun of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration paid by Grantee, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by Granter . 3 . Grant of F.asement. Gran tor hereby grants to Grantee, its successors and assigns, and all public utilities or those with proper license or franchise, a perpetual , nonexclusive easement (the "Utility F.asemen t ") Oller, under, across and through the Easement Property for the purpose of constructing , operating, maintaining , repairing, replacing, removing and enlarging those structures or improvements of Grantee that Grantee finds necessay or desirable for public utility purposes, including, but not limited to, electrical equipnent, telephone equipnent, caimunication equipnent, sewer equipnent and water equipnent. 4. Access. Grantee shall have the perpetual, nonexclusive right of ingress and egress in , to, over, through and across the Easement Property for any purpose necessary or desirable for the full enjoyment of the rights granted to Grantee under this Grant. 5. Restoration. Grantee, or the public utility, or those entities with proper license or franchise, agree that after the construction , maintenance, repair, replacement, or enlargement of • I • • j ( • • • - any of the Lines and ll!?Purtenances, the party exercising rights hereunder shall restore the surface of the Easement Proper ty as nearly as reasonably possible to the grade and corrlition it was in inrne:Jiately prior to said construction, maintenance, repair, replacement, or enlargernent, except as may be necessary to accoornodate the Lines arrl ll!?Purtenances. Party exercising rights hereunder agrees to restore and repair any improvements of Granter on the Easement Property which are d~age:J, modified or altere:J by party exercising rights hereurrler during said construction, main- tenance, repair, replacement or enlargement and, further, agree to replace any topsoil remove:J from any cultivated or larrlscaped areas on the Easement .Property arrl to remove any excess earth resulting from said construction, maintenance, repair, replacement or enlargement, at its sole cost and expense. 6. SUbjacent arrl Lateral support. Granter covenants arrl agrees that Grantee shall have the right of subjacent arrl lateral support on the Easement Property to \oklatever extent is necessary or desirable for the full, complete and urrlisturbed enjoyment of the rights granted to Grantee urrler this grant. 7 . Rights of Granter. Granter reserves the full right to the undisturne:J ownership, use, and occupancy of the Easement Property insofar as said ownership, use, and occupancy is consistent with and does not impair the rights granted to Grantee in this Grant. 8. No Improvements. Granter covenants and agrees not to construct, erect, place or plan any "Improvemen ts ," as hereinafter define:J, on the Easement Property without obtaining the prior written consent of Grantee. "Improvements" shall mean any structure or building. Grantee shall have the right to remove, without any liability to Granter, any improvements constructed, erected , place:J or planted on the Easement Property without Grantee's having obtaine:J the prior written consent of Granter. 9. Abandorrnent. In the event that Grantee shall abandon the rights granted to it urrler this Grant, all right , title and interest hereurrler of Grantee shall cease and terminate, and Granter shall hold the Easement Property, as the same may then be, free fran the rights of Grantee so abandoned and shall own all materials and structures of Grantee so abandoned, provide:J that Grantee shall have a reasonable period of time after said abandon- ment in \oklich to remove any or all Lines and ll!?Purtenances fran the Easement Property . In the event that Easement is abandoned by Grantee, Granter shall have the right , at its sole option, to require Grantee to remove or neutralize any improvements constructed in the Easement by Grantee. 10 . Warranty of Title . Granter warrants and represents that Granter is the fee simple owner of the Easement Property and that Granter has full right, title and authority , and that this Grant is effective to grant and convey to Grantee the Utility Easement. Granter further covenants and agr s to indemnify , defend and hold • I • • ( ( • • • • Grantee harmless from and against any adverse claim to the title of the F.asanent Property by all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the "*1ole or any part thereof. 11. Binding Effect. 'lllis Grant shall extend to and be binding ~n the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. 'Ille terms, covenants, agreements and corrlitions in this Grant shall be construed as covenants running with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Grant of Utility F.asement the day and year first above written. Attest: Gary R. Higbee, ex off1c10 City Clerk-Treasurer Attest: Title: GRANl'QR: CITY OF ENGL&IOOD By~~~~~~~~ E>Jgene L. Otis, Mayor GlANl'EE: FUBLIC SERVICE CCMPANY OF COLORAOO By Title: • I • • - ( ( • • • • srATE OF <X>LORADO SS. COONTY OF ARAPAHOE The foregoing instrunent was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 by-=---..,=-..,..------=-=.,--,..---= by fugene L. Otis as Mayor ari(jc;ary R. Higbee as ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood. Witness my harrl arrl official seal. Hy Qamlission expires: srATE OF <X>LORADO ss. COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE Notary Pl.Jbllc Address: 3400 S. Elati Englewood, <X> 80110 The foregoing instrunent was acknowledged before me this day of , 19 by fugene L. Otis as Mayor arrl Gary R. Higbee as ex officio City--c1erk-Treasurer of the City of Engle-..ood, COlorado. Witness my harrl arrl official seal. My cannission expires: Notary Pl.Jbl ic Address: • I • • ( • • • .. • 9 4 BY AITTHORITY ORDINAOCE NO. _cl__ SERIES OF 1985 COIJN:IL BILL NO. 61 INTRODUCED BY COUOCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW AN ORDINMCE AMENDING TITLE I, OiAE'l'ER 9, SOCTION 2, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE 1969, 1\S AMENDED, PROVIDING A PRCX:ESS BY WHICH ASSOCIATE JUDGES ARE APPOINTED; AND PROVIDING FOR TERMS THEREOF. WHEREAS, Council has received a reccrmiendation of the Englewood Court l'dvisory camiittee; NCM, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COIJN:IL OF THE CITY OF 'ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOL~S: sec ion 1. 'Ihat Title I, 01apter 9, section 2, of the Englewood l'U01c1pal Code of 1969, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: 1-6-2: SUBSTITl!rE MUNICIPAL JUDGE As necessary, the City Council eRall MAY appoint a 6'i86€4€~€e ONE OR MORE ASSOCIATE ~e JUDGES ai ~l'Fl:l!Fi: ~ MlQ i;et'Ye ~ ~ EeJ~lill' ~e ei ~ ltiftie4pal ~€ *6 &ieltT ffieapae4€a€eliT l:lftijYa4la8leT 94~a*4£4ee M 0€\teEw4se t9'1a&*e €9 f11*£9Bll €Ae ~4es ef €Ri6 ef~ Sa40 6'i86€4E~Ee ~e eRaU RaYe aU ~ ~6 ef EAe fieE!llaAeRE ~e ..tio SHALL SIT AT SUCH TIMES AND UPON SUCH CAUSES AS SHALL BE DETE~INED BY THE PRESIDING MUNICIPAL JUDGE. WHEN ACTUALLY PERFORMING JUDICIAL DUTIES, SUCH ASSOCIATE JUDGE SHAU. HAVE ALL THE JURI SDICTION AND ro-lER OF A MUNICIPAL JUDGE AND HIS ORDERS AND JUDGMENI'S SHALL BE THOSE OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT. THE ASSOCIATE JUDGE SHAu. HAVE THE SAME QUALIFICATIONS AS THE MUNICIPAL JUOOE. THE PROCESS BY WHICH AN ASSOCIATE JUDGE IS SELOCTED AND THE TE~ OF THE ASSOCIATE JUDGE SHALL BE AS FOL~: A) ASSOCIATE JUDGES SHALL BE APPOINTill BY CITY CQUN:IL QNI!: M A ~ME: Mi SQ w;p,~l!:Q BY RESOLUTION. B) THE TE~ OF THE ASSOCIATE JUDGE APPOINTMENTS SHALL BE A Mll.XJM"4 ~ FOUR YEARS. C) AT COUNCIL DISCRETION , ASSOCIATE JUDGES MAY BE REAPPOINTED. THE W::UMBENI' ASSOCIATE JUDGES' T~ WOOLD BE FOUR YEARS CCfflEN:ING JANUARY 1 , 1985 EXPIRING JANUARY 1 , 1989.Wi!FH Qill\PP9UliM9'P M iiKI!: 918"RE'i'JQN QF GJ!FlJ ~U .... Introduced , read in full , and passed on first readi03 on the 5th day of November, 1984 • • I • • - • • • • Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 7th day of Nov ember, 1984. Read in full and passed as amended on the 17th day of December, 1984. Puhl ished as amended on the 19th day of December, 1984. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 7th day of January, 1985. Published by title as Ordinance No._d ___ , Series of 1985, on the 9th day of January, 1985. Dlgene L. Otis, Mayor Attest: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Engl~, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of the Ordinance P!issed on final reading and µ.iblished by title as Ordinance No.A-, Series of 1985. Gary R. Higbee • I • • n • • • BY Al1l'HORITY ORDINAOCE 00. ~ SERIES OF 1985 COUNCIL BILL 00. 61 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL M™BER BRADSHAW AN ORDINAOCE l\MENDING TITLE I, CHAPTER 9, SEX:TION 2, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE 1969, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING A PR<X:ESS BY WHICH ASSOCIATE JUDGES ARE APPOINTED; AND PROVIDING FOR TERMS THEREOF. WHEREAS, Council has received a reccmnendation of the Engle....ood Court Advisory Carmittee; ~. THEREFORE, BE IT ORmINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FO~S: Section 1. 'nlat Title I, Olapter 9, Section 2, of the Englewood M.m1cipal COde of 1969, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: 1-6-2: SUBSTITUl'E MUNICIPAL JUDGE As necessary, the City Council &Ra** MAY appoint a ~4~1:14'e ONE OR MORE ASSOCIATE ~e JUDGES~ ~I~ !!-'QR AH9 &eEYe ~ ~ f.'e'j~aE ~e ef ~ ~Rie4pa* Gel:IE~ is ~T iRE!apae4~aieT 1:1RaYa4*~ Q4~a*4f4eEI eE &Ei'let;~&e l:iRaB*e €9 fiel!.'feat ~ ~4es ef ~is eff~ Saie sl:IB6~4~1:1~e ~e &AaU i=laYe aU ~ ~s ef ~ pe!flllaAeR~ ~e llkto SHALL SIT AT SU::H TIMES AND UPON SOCH CAUSES AS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE PRESIDING MltHCIPAL JUDGE. WHEN ACTUAILY PERFORMING JUDICIAL DUTIES, SOCH ASSOCIATE JUDGE SHALL HAVE AIL THE JURISDICTION AND ~ OF A MUNICIPAL JUDGE AND HIS ORDERS AND JUDQ1ENI'S SHALL BE THOSE OF THE MUNICIPAL COURT. THE ASSOCIATE JUDGE SHALL HAVE THE SAME QUALIFICATIONS AS THE MWICIPAL JUDGE. THE PROCESS BY WHICH AN ASSOCIATE JUDGE IS SELa::TED AND THE TERMS OF THE ASSOCIATE JUDGE SHALL BE AS FOu.a-15: A) ASSOCIATE JUcx;ES SHALL BE APPOINTED BY CITY COUOCIL QHE MA !fIME AS SQ ~ilB BY RESOLUTION. B) THE TERM OF THE ASSOCIATE JUDGE APPOIN'IMENTS SHALL BE A ~IMl:l4 G! FOUR YEARS. C) AT COl.JOCIL DISCRETION, ASSOCIATE JUDGES MAY BE REAPPOINTED. THE EN::UMBENT ASSOCIATE JUDGES' TERMS WOOLD BE FOUR YEARS CCff1E!CING JANUARY 1, 1985 EXPIRING JANUARY 1, 1989.Wi!fH ~PP9ItlD4QIP M !fHE 91~RSIFIQN Q¥ Gi!flJ ~UrT Introdoced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 5th day of November, 1984. • I • • - • • • ' I • • • Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 7th day of November, 1984. Read in full a00 passed as amended on the 17th day of December, 1984. Published as emended on the 19th day of December, 1984. Read by title a00 passed on final reading on the 7th day of January, 1985. Published by title as Ordinance No. c:( , Series of 1985, on the 9th day of January, 1985. E>.Jgene L. otis, Mayor Attest: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above a00 foregoing is a true, accurate a00 canplete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading a00 published by title as Ordinance No.~, Series of 1985. Gary R. Higbee • I • • - • C 0 U N C I L DATE Decemb e r 28, 1984 • • • C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITE M 11 a_, SUBJECT Southgate Sanitation District Supplement #10 4 Englew ood Water and Se wer Board INITIATED BY ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ACTION PROPOSED·~~~A_P _P r_o_v_a_l _o_f~S_o _ut_h_g_a_te~S_a_n_i _ta_t_i_o_n _D_i_s_t_r_ic_t_'_s~~~~~~ Supple men t #104 BACKGROUND Districts r eceivi ng sewe rage treatme nt from t he City of Englewood must ame nd their contracts with the City if they desire to include add- itional land within their district bou ndaries. A request was made by the Southgate Sanitatio n District representing the owner/deve l oper for annexation to the Southgate Sanitation District area . Inclusion of this land does not increase the tap allocation to the Southgate Sa nitation District. The land is surrounded by the Southgate Sanitation District and can be served by the District sewers. a. The subject land parcel is approximately 2.3 acres in size and is presently zoned B-1 with the proposed zoning to re main the same. b. Legal: See "Exhi bit A" attached to Supplement M104 c. Owne rs : Greenwood Centre, Ltd. FINANCIAL DETAILS None. RECOMMENDA Tl ON At the December 11, 1984 meeting the Water and Sewer Board recommended that the City Council approve the annexation of the property described in Supplement #104 to the Southgate Sanitation District . • I • • • 19 )1 J _,, ~ • • i i • -;1l lf rrfP _,.L/.""'" I ~)! J ~,, ,.,, .l' !" j./ . , ; • • • ~ '/ a:: LITTLETON 11 \ 1e tit\' Of' ENGLEWOOO , COLO SANITATION DISTR ICTS BOW .. AA Cl«.fn'Y HILL 5 SAN ASS OC ! CHERRY HILLS SAN NO I 4 CH[,.JtY HILLS HUGHTS S CHEMtY HILLS lltANCHO I. CHUtAY Hit.LS VILL.&OE 7. CHEA-.Y ftlOGE I CHClltAY MOORE I. CH£ARYVAL[ Ml, COlUlllllN( VALL[Y ___ '" __ -u"· =::!Yu HOtllt5 \llJ. GM:ENWOOO YILLAM toll 9H['"OAN Htll S 9 SOUTH ARAPAHO[ it SOUTH £NOL£WOOO f SOUTHCAT[ ... YALL[Y I '\ HILLS VILLAGE '~ g f \ ·~ \· \ \~ ~10+ \ 17 _L \ ' _-l __ ~jl~ ~-~~ .. --.11 ii' : ' .. I IJ •• 5 ••.. JI ""l ~ J ---·----~-.!!--..!.~- I · • • ~ - • ORDINAOCE NO. SERIES OF 19 8_5 ____ _ • • • BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR Cc::A.Jl'CIL BILL NO . 5 INTRODU~ COUOCIL MEMBER ~ AN ORDINAN:E APPROVING SUPPLEMENT NO. 104 TO SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT 'S AGRED-IENT WITH THE CITY OF ENGLEWCX>D TO IOCLUDE ADDITION/\L IAND WITHIN THEIR DISTRICT BOUNDARIES. WHEREAS, Southgate Sanitation District desires to include additional land with in their d i s t rict boundaries; and WHERE:i\S , annexation of this additional parcel of land will not increase the tap allocation to the Southgate Sanitation District; and WHER&l\S, it is necessary for said District to anend its contracts witi1 the City of Englewood to include this additional land within the District; Na-I, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORAOO, AS FOLL.CMS: Section 1. Tne City Council of Engle1o10od hereby approves the agreement entitled "Slpplement No. 104 to Connector's Agreement" between Southgate Sanitation District and the City of En gle1o10od , a copy of ...tiich is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. 'rhe Mayor and ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer are hereby authorized to sign and attest, respectively, the said agreanent for and on behalf of the City Council and the City of Englewood. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 7th day of January, 1985. Published as a Bi 11 for an Ordinance on the 9th day of January, 1985. Attest: &:!gene L. Otis, Mayor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treas~rer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, • I • - • j I • • • int roduced , read in full, and passed o n firs t reading o n the 7th d ay of J a nuary, 1985. Gary R. Hi g bee • I I l I • • I I • • • :;(ll'PLEMENT fl. 10'4 TO CONNECTOR'S AGREFMENT TllIS AGREEMENT, mad e a nd entered into by and betwec,n the CITY OF CN GLCWOOD, •Ctlng by and through its dul y authorized Mayor and City Clerk, here1na:ter referred to as •city,• and SOUTHGATE SAN ITATTON DISTR ICT . Arapahoe and Dougl as Counties. Colorado, hereinafter referred to as ~Distric t,• WIT NESSETH: WH EREAS, on th e 20th day of June, A.O. 1961, the City entered into a Co nnector's ~greemen t with the District concerning the c o nnection of the D1str1c t sewer c o l l ect1on fac ili ties to th~ City's sewage system, wh ich Co nnector's Agreeme nt was modified and .1mended by agreement dated the 4th day of Apr il, 1966: and WHEREAS, said agre emen t and modification thereof provided th ~t additional se rvice areas could be included within the l imi ts of the District with the written con sent of the City ; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual c over.ants of the parties hereto, it is ag reed as foll o ws: 1. The City does hereby cons ent to the inclusion ot the additional area, situate in the County of Arapahoe, State of Col o rado, described as fo l _o ws, to wit : Property Owner: Property Desc r1pt1 on: Greenwood Centre, Ltd., a Co lorado Limi ted Partnership 1873 South Bellaire Street Su i te 900 Denve r, CO 80222 As more fully described in Exhibit A attached hereto and inco rpor ated h rein by reference. into ~au hqate Son1tat1or 01st r1ct, ard aqrees t hat said add1t1onal area muy be serv~d with the sewer fac1l1t1c ~ o f the District, nd that th~ C1 y w1 l treaL the sewa ge d1scharg~d in o th e City's trunk line frcrr sa td ad d1 ional are a , all in nccordancu with Lhe CorrucLor'• Agreerrtt n t dated June 20, 1961, and the modif1cat1on tl"<'rPof d~t ed th 4th duy of Apri l , 19t6 , hrtwcen the Cit;y ~nd th" 01~lr1ct. Accordi ngly, E>:h ib1 t A r ~fer r~d to in p ara~rarh I of the, Mod1f1cat 1on to the Conn c tor'• • I • • - • • • • • Agreement ~J L~d the 4th d~y of April , 1966, is hereby amendtd t 0 i1lclud ~ Lh ~ add itional d rCd a~ set forth hereindbove. 2 . F..:ic h and t::Vt•ry \)t her p r o vision of the Modi f i cd ti o n to th e C un n~~tor's A~rcemcn t dated che 4t h ddy ot Apri l, l ~L,, bhJl rema1n un cn~n g~d. IN WITNC SS WHF.R EOP, the pdrtie5 have caused their names an d seals to be herPunt o subscribed and affixed this __ day o f ATTE~T: CITY CLERK (SEAL) ATTEST: SECRETARY ISE f.L) 198_ MAYOR SOUTHGATE SANITATI ON DIST r.ICT ARAPAHOE J..ND DOU GLAS COUNTIES, COLOPJ\00 By=p=n=E=s=r=o=EN_T ________ _ -i- • I • • • • • . I -. '· .-• .:--:.,.:<""~~,y rr ~ ........ ~--~•I· , .. . . . :, vv.· --:-~ . . . : I -.. ---~~ ;.1 ...; r ··-//. i . '.. -.. _, . -t--.... ) I _. .. .{ . ..,. _yf 0}' '-i -1-/ · ~ .. • ../. ~ ' ~ l'., •· -· . -'-• ..• .'.--:.. • :. . ._:.... : • .=: ~ -·-. -. : ·.'!>::-__ -=:;:;,if ,;s.·...:_: :;..-,::.:·· ; . -~ • . •. . . -· . . . .. . . ' -. . _:'. , ;'.;· : . : . ·'. . . ... "~ . . .. - . ... . , ' . .. ·' ::-:-•~ •• --: c_o• •• ...;,:,...-::-·~)! ~ -.------;_;-·.··.;:: ... ·-:·-. --· -~. '. ·• , .. ,.~ : .• _;.· •. ;.· .. •. :.;·::.--_...,...: ".; •. : . .>. ::.· ·::~ ' ~ ...... ---- ·' ' I • ---·---·-------·-------·------:-~-------.... - ~ ~Sl c:ine -tw.lf of LDt •• alo.:k l, .. &:lIVlSIO'l er SD-~JO" 1', 'IO«SlllP S SOJnt, AA..:X ~7 .. 'EST . CDwn\Y ol '-'•?"--· Sut.e o! CD\orado. dc~r U)(!d •• foll°"'5 : ~ncu·.q •l ~ wc•l onc~rter corner r ' S.l :d Sc<t1on 16 : U°'Cr-..'V norU"c rly , ..,\Qn9 t.t~ .... _.~t h .. ~ of t.tc oo~\Jl ..cst onc~ctcr of ~id Sr.-ct.1on 16, • dist.M\...~ of l0 .00 fC"Ct to Ve lJlt.efM!Cl'-on "'lth t..hl! nort.J'1 r19~t~!-..sy line of Derry ,.,\olen .c utcrded : ~on .n ~le to the 0 9:1t of eg• 4.2' oo·, •lcrq w1d rLqht-<>f.....,.,)' l~ exh:t~. • daU.l'\.i:.C of l0 .00 (eel t.o • point O\ uw u•t r-.c;ht-<>f ...,..y l i..rc of South O.,..C::.:C Street , •ud poUlt bci..n; the '°'"'t..~~t o.:i mer of ~id lot I and t.he uue p:>i.nt ot b.!'l l.Nl~; tnenor on Al'\ &."l'fl« to tJ'-.e artl o( 19• 42 ' oo• iL.J •lo....q w1C r ~i. ~ .. r;"'lt.-o C-•) }!.: .. ~ c~ :,... .... _, :•.-·;··; suecl • d1•tA.'lC9 of 121.12 tc.-e l to t..."le ro.v-~~t C'1:-ncr ot w1d Lot. I; t.he..""Ce Cl\ .n a.--.~le to the n~t o f 19• t 2' 01"'. •l~ t.he ron)I l~ of !:r.H d lDt. I , • d u~"'IOe of ll l . 96 f Cll!t to Uw n:Jrt.ht"..s»l coiner of tJc w.:st cn--to4lt c! s .. ud lot I ; t.t...z CS\ e.n iL-.qlc U> U"c c 1rjrt o! 90• 20' ~s·, a l~ t..tc c..Ht llla of w i d >en aw:-hAlf, • d.utA<""' of )l).12 fort '"' • p>U\t en U1E n..rt)1 n9f'l-<>f _,y li..ne o l Sen)' ,.._"" ard U... ~th line of wad Lat (', t)"c'""2 on a.n iL"'Qle tD tJ"e ucf'lt, alonr,J • .,d ""'-'VI l1J11 ol a;ud lDt I a:d t.lc ro::-Ul oq"l\-ol-r llla of krl)' ,.WJ>U<, • d.l.•Un<r of 31).U foe\ tn t)'c poll'\ ol bo."l1J"""'9 · • ·1 < ' ) ii '".:• ·: ; ' , "> '\ l ., : l .. .:,:-1 . i 1 ,·, ,1· l -.... .• ! .· l ~r ' -. -.. , , .. · "·'. J I )\ .\ :- I • • ' • • r • C 0 U N C I L DA TE De cember 28, 1984 • • • C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM II b SUBJECT Greenwood Village Supplement #9 INITIATED BY ~~~~-E n_g_l_e_w_o_od~W_a_te_r~a_n_d_S_e_w_e_r_B_o_a_r_d~~~~~~~~~~~ ACTION PROPOSED~~~A_p_p_r_o_v_a~lo_f_G_r_e_e_n_w_oo_d~V_i_l_la_g_e~S_up_p_l_e_m_en_t~#-9~~~~~~ BACKGROUND Districts receiving sewerage t r e atment from the City of En glewood must amend their contra ct s with the City if they desire to incl ude additional land within their dis tr ic t boundaries. A request was made by the Greenwood Village Sewer General Improvem en t District representing the owner/develop e r for annexation to the Greenwood Village Sewer General Improve ment District area. In c lusi on of this land does not in c r ease the tap allocation to the Greenwood Village Sanitation Distri ct . The land is surrounded by the Greenwood Village San i tation District and can be served by the Di s t rict sewer s . a . The sub j ec t land pa rc el is ap pro xi mately 30 acres of vacant l and. The pro pose d zoning is to be fo r single fa mi l y residences. b . Legal : See Parcel A and Parce l B De s c ri pt i on attached to Supplement #9. c . Owners: Eulalia Reagan Cer vi, Mary Clare Symo ns and Clara Rod r iquez, c/o Leonard M. Camp bell FINANCIAL DETAILS None. RECOM MENDATION At the December 11, 1984 meeting the Water and Sewer Board reco11111ended that the City Council approve the a nnexation of the property described in Supplement #9 to the Greenwood Village Se wer General Improvement District. • I • • • ~ • •• ll 9" ='' }I ~ ·~ ;,J ....._, . ._. -· . 92)\ \\ 0 • ~ :- 6: ! r ' • • • I I ~· : .. --- f '/ ~!.' f/! ii f' i •' -- f I I L~_.w, I' :I 1!5 :ii ,, r .I sl1 Ji ~· ~. •' ,1 - \~ '\ -\, Cr!'V or E'-" r._'.lD. ':O LC S•NITATll'IN o• .... 1c rs ----- "ow ... ,. c ..-.lltP'f Hll l ~ i;a~ ·~t:("IC ' CH['Utl' Mil l S c;AN lrrfO I 4 C .. [RRl !till S Mf"l(jt4 T, S CMfMtY HILLS A&~C +-'O & ('M[RlltY ..,._l 5 Vlll Ari( l' Ct-ir""' pltOGf' llt 04!:11tlltY M()('U~[ 9.. CMClltA YV&Lf. t0 COLU .. AINE VALLEY II . COUNl" Y MOM(S I It. OllCEN~~LT \ I!. OllC [NWOO~ VILLlll( t4 9H[ftl0Mril MfLL S 15 900T H APU,PAM()[ rt. !(IUTH ENGL[W000 I~ 11 !OUTHGlTE '-___ " Vlll[Y .._ _____ -4. \ ... lll 9 \1 1LL AGC \ fl Ii JI jl 1: I' 11 , __ 1 .:I i ·~ \ \. I 12 ,, \\ ~lo+ ·~ 17 i __ _ T ----~1--- • 1 ~ ' I I ------... ----• I · • • ( • ORDINAN:::E NO. SERIES Of 198_5 __ _ • • • BY Al.Jl'llOR!TY A BILL FOR COUOCIL BILL NO. 4 JNTR~~K:IL MFJ1BEF< A'.~ OPDINAOCE APPHOVING SUPPLEMEITT NO. 9 TO CITY OF ENGLEMoon CONN!:X'TORS AGREE}1ENT, SEWER CONTRACT NO. 12, GREENWCX>O VILLAGE SEWE!< GENERAL IMPIWVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1. WHEREAS, Greenwood Village Sewer General Improvanent District No. 1 desires to include additional land within their district boundaries; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for said District to anend its contracts with the City of Englewood to include this additional land within the District; NCM, 'Il!EREFOR E, BE IT ORO.l\INED BY THE CITY COUOCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLO.-JS: Section 1. 'n'le City Council of Englewood hereby approves tht> agreanent entitled "Greenwood Village Sewer General Improvanent District No. 1, SUpplanent No. 9 to City of Englewood Connectors Agreanent, Sewer Contract No. 12," a copy of W"lich is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. 'n'le M:iyor and ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer are hereby authorized to sign and attest, respectively, the said agreenent for and on behalf of the City Council and the City of Englewood. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 7th day of January, 1985. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 9th day of January, 1985. Attest: Eugene L. Otis, M:iyor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer • I • • ( ( • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 7th day of January, 1985. Gary R. Higbee • r I • • ( <, • • • - GRE ENW OOD VI LLAG E SEWER GE NERAL I MPkOVEMENT DISTRICT NO. I SUPPL EMENT NO . 9 TO CITY OF ENGLEWOOD CON1'ECTORS AGREEMENT SEWJ.:H CO!'.'rHACT NO. 12 THIS AGREEMLNT made dnd e n t e r e d into by and b e tween the CITY OF ENG LE l·IOOD, acti ng by and thro ugh its duly authoriz .,d Mdyor d nd City Clerk, ht:re1 na ftcr r<. . .;fcrred t o as "City", and GREENWOOD VILLAGE SEWER GENERAL IMPkOVEMENT DISTRICT NO. I, Ara pahoe County, Colorado , hereinaft e r refer r ed t o as "D i stri ct.", WlTNES SE Tll THAT: WHEREAS, o n the first day o f May 1969, the City entered into a Connectors Agreement w i~h the District concerning the connec - tion of the District's sewer collection fac i l ities t o the Ci Ly 's sewage s y stem; and WHEREAS, said Agreen1 en t provided th at additiona l service areas could be included within the limi ts of the D1&tr1c with the wri tten consent of the City; and WHEREAS, said District has included by st a t uto r y procedure the following d scribed lo~ds wi hin its boundaries; NOW, THEREFORE, in cons1dera t1on of the premises and the mutual covenan t s of the part1c~ he r eto, it is agreed as tullows: 1. That the City douto hcr~by consf'nt to t.hc inclu sion of the following described ddd1 tlondl ldnds w1 thin the bounduri<·& of s~1d District, all si Udte within the County of Ardpahoe, St tu of Colorado, to wit: Pet1t1011t rs or Ownt:rs: Eulalia Re agan Cervi, Mary Cla r e Symons c/o Leona rd M. Campbell , 1 4 01 17th Stre Denver, ColorddO 80 02 Legal DPncr1ption Pl\RCEL A: nd Cla r u Rorlr1quez, , Sui t e llGL, That part of tht. NE', < t Section 14, Town ship 5 South, R n<J<: 68 Webt of the blh P.M., rormeily known as Tr cts io , n, 22 , 27 , 28 and 29, ROJAMOND PAHK (now v Cdt~dl' EXCEPT th W bl -) l~ ·L bl Luld Tr Clb 20 and 29, • I • - ( • <; • • • • PAl<CC:L B: TOGETHER WITH the si, of vacated Wilamette Avenue ad ]uccnt to Tracts 20 , 21 and 22, ROSAMOND PAkJ; (now vacated), EXCEPT th" w~st 25 fe~t thereof and th~ N~ of vacated Garden Avenul! ad]acent t o Tracts 27 , 28 and 29 , ROSAMOND PAl<K l r.ow vacat e d) , EXCE~T the West 25 feet thcrco1, in the Co unt y of Arapahoe , s ate of Colora d o. ~-That the City hereby dgrees thdt said additio nal area may be served W>t h the e x•sting sewe r fac•lities of said District, and that the C•ty will treat the sewage disc hdrged •nto the District's sanitary sewage system and into tl1~ City 'ti tru nk line from said add1t.1onal area , all in accordance wit h the Connectors AgreemE:nt between the Ci ty and the D•stri c 1 und the rules and regulations governing such matters promulgated by the City . 3. That each and every oth"r prov•sion of said Connectors Agreement shall remained unchange d. IN WITNESS Wfl EREm', the parties have set th.,ir hdnds and seals this ~~-day o f 11.TT I:ST: City Clerk (SEAL) ATTEST: -....;:__/ ~ .. Secretar;,{ (SEAL) CITY OF ENGLEWOOD GRl:.1:.Ni.OOD VILLAGE SEWEil GENekAL IMPROVEMENT UlSTklCT NO. ~~~ B y~C~h-d-i~r-m_a_n~o7f~th~e~B~o-u_r_d.--~~- • I • • ( ( • • • COUNCIL C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE December 28, 1984 AGENDA ITEM I c.. SUBJECT Tr i-Ci ty Tr us t Di sso l ution INITIATED BY En gl ewood Water and Se wer Board ACT ION PROPOSED~~~-C_o~u n~c~i~l_;;;.a p~p~r~o~v~a~l~o~f--"t ~he;:.......;T~r~i --C~1~·t~y-'-Tr~u~s~t_;;;.D ~is~s~o~l ~u ~t1~·o~n-'-~~ • BACKGROUND The Tri-City Trust was originally created by Denver, Englewood and Littleton for the purchase of senior water rights on the South Platte River between Alameda Avenue and the entrance to Wate r ton Canyon in the 1950's . When Denver took over Littleton's water system, Littleton's share went to the Denver Water Board. Denver and Englewood now agree that it would be mutually advantageous to dissolve the Trust so that we can each proceed to use our respective water rights as we see fit. On December 15, 1983 the Trustees directed the engineers of Denver and Eng lewood to detenTiine the best method of transfer of the water rights of the Trust. The engineers agreed that the most expeditious and fair method would be to quantify on a consumptive use basis. This has been done, and the results a~ presented in the attached rep..Qrt su11111ary. The City owned about ~·of the Trust and will retain~' of the consumptive use in the ditches that are most advantageous for the City of Englewood to utilize . An independent audit is being perfonTied prior to the final dissolution action. FINANCIAL DETAILS None. RECOMMENDATION The Englewood Water and Sewer Board recommended at their December 11, 1984 meeting that Council approve the Tri-City Trust Dissolution as presented in the attached report surrmary . • I • ( ( • • • • TRI-CITY TRUST DISSOLUTION DENVER WATER DEPARTMENT AND CITY OF ENGLEWOOD by J . Patrick Quinlan Edwin D. James DENVER WATER DEPARTMENT Ronald K. Blatchley BLATCHLEY ASSOCIATES , INC. November 1984 • I . ( ( • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Section No. I. II. III. IV. Figures Tables Appendixes INTRODUCTION RIGHTS • . . DITCH CONSUMPTIVE USE A. Brown Ditch ••....... B. Epperson Ditch ......• C. Nevada Ditch ....... . D. Last Chance Ditch Co. No. 2. E. City Ditch DIVISION OF RIGHTS ..... Figure 1. Historic Straight Line Diagram. Table 1. Average Potential Consumptive Use Requirement For Six Crops 1911 -1950 Brown Ditch ...• Appendix A -Brown Study . . . Appendix B -Epperson Study .. Appendix C -Nevada Study ... Appendix D -Last Chance Study Appendix E -City Study .... • Page 1 3 4 7 10 12 17 19 22 23 Beige Orange Yellow Blue Red I • • - ( ( • • • • TRI-CITY TRUST DISSOLUTION I. INTRODUCTION The Tri-City Trust was created on June 3, 1956 by Denver, Englewood, and Littleton for the purchase of senior water rights on the South Platte River between Alameda .Avenue and the entrance to Waterton Canyon. Water rights were purchased by each city and delivered to the Trust, which held title to the rights. As the rights were delivered an account was established for each city for value received, and credit was given as a percentage of total assets. Additionally, a cash account was established as a purchasing fund. Cities received credit for cash deposited with the fund. No water has been purchased since August of 1962. In 1963 an audit, done by McMahon, Maddox and RodriQUez, was made of the assets and the percentage of ownership of each city was established as follows. City Littleton Denver Englewood Percentage of Ownership of Trust's Assets 42.1624 37.1180 20. 7196 100.0000 • I • • • • .. - I n 1970 De nver acquired all water rights of the city of Littleton, includi ng its interest i n the Tri-City Trust, when a total service co ntract was executed . Since 1963, several meetings have been held to discuss the dissolution of the Trust and to distribute the assets. A method of distributing the assets has bee n di fficu l t t o identify because of the complexi t y of evaluating the water rights for future use. Neither Englewood nor Denver was anxious to acQUire a right that was of questionable or uncertain usefulness. Another factor complicating the distribution was the aw kwardness of Denver and Englewood potentially acquiri ng approximately 79% and 21i, respectively, of each r i ght owned by the Trust . Operationall y, each city would ~h rather work wi t h one or two di tches than wi th five ditches which would actually entai l the use of proportionate shares of ten different water rights. On Decemb er 15, 1983 the Trustees directed t he eng i neers of Denver and Engl ewood to determi ne the best method of transf e r of the water r i ght s of the Trust. The eng i ree rs agreed tha t the most expeditious and fair method available would be to quantify the historical consllJlltive use of irrigation water of the rights. Then distribution would proceed based on a 79/21 split according to consllJlltive use of irrigation water, with the intention that the rights themselves would remain as whole as possible. The one exception would be if it were necessary to divide one of the rights in order to make the entire distribution equal to an overall 79/21 split. -2- • I • • ~I. -, • • • • RIGHTS The Tri-City Trust, in its short life, purchased rights in five different ditches, totaling 24.653 cubic feet per second (cfs). (See Figure l for a brief familiarization of the ditch locations.) As of February 1984, the Trust has title to the following rights: Ditch Last Chance Ditch No. 2 Nevada Brown Epperson City Trust Ownership Shares or Inches Diversion Rate 9. 712 shares 1.265 cfs 29.33 shares 7.038 cfs 518.10 inches 13.438 cfs 86.40 inches 2.25 cfs 25.43 incrie 0.662 cfs 24.653 cfs Each of these rights has been used historically for irrigation, domestic and municipal use, or all three. However, some of the record keeping has been poor or nonexistent, and in the case of the ditch c~anies, it has been difficult, if not i~ssible, to connect actual shares or inches to a parcel of land, crops and a historic consunptive use nunber. Each ditch has its own unique history and analytical problems. Hence, each ditch was examined individually and analyzed according to the most practical and acceptable method. Each ditch is discussed in the following section. -3- • I • • • • • It i s recormiended that 42.6 llF of historic consurrptive use of irrigation water for the City Ditch be used for dissolution of the Tri-City Trust. IV. DIVISION OF RIGHTS The consurptive use of irrigation water attributed to the Tri-City Trust r i ghts has been evaluated, and the following estimates of historic consurptive use of irrigation water should be used for division of the water rights presently Owned by the Tri-City Trust. ~ Epperson Ditch Brown Ditch Ne vada Ditch La st Chance Di tch City Di tch Total ConsL!!J>tive Use in Acre-Feet Per Year 284.2 207.4 5D7.2 157.5 42.6 - 1198.9 The Brown Ditch should not be divided at this time. The PrOductivity of the Brown Ditch depends on reviewing the municipal and irrigation uses of the ditch or transferring the historic consunptive use to Denver and Englewood intake structures. Neither proposition could be acCOfllllished within the time frame desired for dissolution or the Trust. For this reason, the Trust should be dissolved by placing the Brown Ditch in a 79121 joint ownership by EnglewoQd and Denver and dividing the Last O'lance, (f Nevada, City and Epperson Ditch rights as follows: -19- • I • - • • • • Pr912osed DwnershiE Historic Pa rticieant Structure QJ in PF l't_r Shares/Inches ~ Remarks ~ Denver Epperson Ditch 284.2 86.40 inches 2.25 entire ownership Last Chance Ditch 157.5 9.712 shares l.265 entire ownership Nevada Ditch ~ 19.92 shares ~ Sut>total 786. l 8.255 Englewood City Ditch 42.6 25.43 inches 0.662 entire ownership Nevada Ditch ~ 9.41 shares ~ Subtotal ~ ~ Total 991.5 ll.215 This division would be consistent with the 79/21 split, and it would also have the advantage of leaving the Epperson Ditch intact. Englewood owns the City Ditch headgate and ditch down to Harvard Gulch and is desirous of obtaining additional contract water. Cit should be noted that when the structure was deeded over to Englewood in the contract dated February 6, 1970, Englewood was limited to obtaining a maximun of 2.25 cfs of contract water. The acquisition or the Tri-City Trust inches will bring their holdings to 2.6522 crs, requiring a modification of the original agreement between Englewood and Denver.) This study has quantified the historic consumptive use of irrigation water which in our combined opinions would be transferable in water court f proc Pedings. Many ass1.111ptions were made and generalizations utilized to -20- • • I • • - ' 1 1. I f • • • • arrive at these nunbers, but there is a dearth of data in this area and what was available was used. It is unlikely that material differences would be found with more research. It is reasonable to expect that significant funds would be required for transfer or change in use, 111hich in our opinion would have the same end result as to allowable future consunptive use. It is our combined reCOlllnendation that these nunbers be utilized for dissolution of .the Trust. -21- • I • • • • • f 11 !I ii :E c a: /I 0 c c Ill s > c I l&I 11 z .. ::; "' ~ Ill :z: ,.I llC 2 ~ :::t ~ 0 c c ii: a: ~ 1:1 en ~ .. !.! ID "': a: ID 'I 0 ~ ~ en -!r % I I. ID 1· • I • • • t f -22- • 0 • • • ...... ~ili'f•iiil··-~---'•tt'lllil:ZtlOI, tti..' ................. ___ ... ,,_ ............. -----.,. -= ( 1 ---- FIGUR E 1 HISTORIC STRAIGHT LINE DIAGRAM I "' "' I • 3.0 9.5 PLATTE RIVER • 0 - • 1' /l'4 - • • • • • • • Table I Average Potential Consumptive Use Requirement For Six Crops 1911 -1950 Brown Ditch ---·---- Average Number of Potential c.u. Cit(;![l A'augi:: vuu gf l2iiU Aliiit!i:-FlilU 1 A!litri Pasture Grass 20 3 Alfalfa 70 39 Orchard 8 4 Sugar Beets 20 11 Garden (Small Vegetables) 64 28 Cereals 61 31 Average unit c~nsumptive use or irrigation water = l.46 acre-feet /Ac re l. 73 l. 95 l. 66 l.61 .97 l. 24 • The average unit consumptive use requirement for all the crops for the Brown Ditch analysis was calculated by adding the entire consumptive use for all crops for the 40-year study period and dividing it by the total amount of acres irrigated in those 40 years. -23- • I / . I • • - • • ORDHIAOCE NO. SE RIES OF 198:""'5 __ _ • • • BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUOCIL BILL NO. 7 INTROO~B~OUNCIL MEMBER AN ORDINAl'CE APPROVING TH E DISSOLUTION OF THE TRI-CITY TRUST ORIGINALLY CREATED BY DENVE R, ENGLEWOOD AND LITTLE'roN FOR PURCHASE OF SENIOR WATER RIGHTS ON SOUT H PLATTE RIVER. WHERE.&.S, the Tri-City Trust was originally cr ~ated by De~ver, Englewood and Littleto n for the purchase of senior water righ s on the South Plat te River between Al~eda Avenue and the entrance to Waterton Canyon in the 1950's; an:l WHEREAS, Whe n Denver took over Littleton's wa ter system, Littleton's sha re went to the Denver water Board; and WHEREAS, Denve r and Englewood now agree tha t it would be mutually ad vantageous to dissolve the Trust s o that each can proceed to use their respective water rights as they see fit; and , WHEREAS, the Englewood Wat e r and Sewer Bo a r d recoomended at their Decembe r 11, 1984 meeting that Counc il approve the Tri-City Trust Dissolution as presented in the attached report SL?mlary; Na-<, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUOClL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEW()()f), COLORAOO, AS FOLLCMS: Section 1. City Council hereby approves the b asis of d issolution presented i n the report entitled "Tri-City Trust Dissolution Den ver Water Department and City of Englewood." Section 2. City Council authorizes the Ma yor to vote for the dissolution of the Tri-City Trust on the basis presented in the above mentioned report at the next meet ing of the Tri-City Trust. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 7th day of January, 1985. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 9th day of January, 1985 . Attest: D.lgene L. Otis, Mayor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I • • - • • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ord i nance , introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 7th day of January, 1985. Gary R. Higbee • I l I • • - ( . • C 0 U N C I L DATE De cem ber 28, 1984 INITIATED BY • • • C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM II cl. SUBJECT City Ditch Licen se Agreement for Windermere and Belleview Engl ewood Water and Sewer Board ACTION PROPOSED~~~A~p~pr_o_v_a_l_o_f~t_h_e_L_i_c_e_n_se~A~g_r_ee_m_e_n_t~be_t_w_e_e_n_t_h_e~C_it~y~o_f~~ Englewood and Leslie N. Johnso n BACKGROUND If an landowner wished to make an installation which crosses the City Ditch, the landowner must receive a license from the City which specifies the conditions under which the installation may be made and maintained. This License Agreement allows Leslie N. Johnson to install an 8" ductile iron water pipe across the City's right-of-way, located at approximately Windennere and Belleview . Licensee shall clear the crossing area of all construction debris and restore the area to its previous condition as near as may be reasonable. In the event the water line should interfere with any future use of the City's right-of-way, the Licensee shall, upon request and at its sole expense, relocate, rearrange, or remove its installation so as not to interfere with any such use. FINANCIAL DETAILS None RECOMMENDATION Council approve the License Agreement between the City of Englewood and Leslie N. Johnson. • I . - • ORDINAN.:r. NO. SCRIES Of 198~-- • • • BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUl-K:IL BILL NO. 6 INTROOOC~lJOCIL MFMBER AN ORDINAN2E APPROVING LICENSE AGREFl'1ENT BE'IWEEN LESLIE N. JOHt~SOtJ AND THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO INSTALL A WATER PIPE ACROSS THE CITY'S R!GHT-OF-\~AY NEAR WINDERMERE AND BELLEVIJ:lV. WHEREAS, landowner I.esl ie N. Johnson desires to insta ll an 8" ductile iron water pipe across the City of Englewood right-of-way at approximately Windermere and Belleview; and WHEREAS, landowner must receive a license fr001 the City of Englewood specifying the terms and conditions for installation a:-id maintenance of the water pipe; NCM, 'IHEREFORE, BE IT ORJ),11.INEO BY THE CITY COUOCIL OF THE CITY OF El-Kil.~, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. 'Ille City Council of Englewood hereby approves the license agreemen t between Leslie N. Johnson and the City of Englewood for licensee• s construction and installation of an 8" ductile iron water pipe across the City's right-of-way at or near s. Windermere and W. Belleview, a copy of which agreenent is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. 'ITie Mayor and ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer are hereby authorized to sign and attest, respectively, the said License Agreanent for and on behalf of the City Council and the City of Englewood. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 7th day of January, 1985. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 9th day of January, 1985. Attest: Eugene L. Otis, Mayor ex off1c10 city Clerk-Treasurer • I • - • ( • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above arrl foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 7th day of January, 1985. Gary R. Higbee • t I l I • • ( • • • • LI CEN SE AGRE EM (NT THIS AGREEMENT, made a nd e ntered into a s of the __;,:_day of I··- 19_t:i._ by and between the CIT Y (JF EN GL EWOOD, a municipal corporat i on of th e State of Colorado, here i nafter r t ferred t o as the "City", and LESLIE N. JOHN SON, an individual, here i nafter referred t o as "LICENSEE.• WITNESSETH : The City without a ny wa rra n ty of its t i tle or interes t whatsoever, hereby authorizes Li censee, i ts successor and assign s , to construct, utilize, maintain, repair and replace one (I) 8" DUCTILE IRON WATER PIPE within and across the City 's rights-of-way for the CITY DITCH, situated in the SE 1/4, SW 1/4 of SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST of the 6th PRINCIPAL '1ERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO, along the followi ng described centerline: Beginning at the S 1/4 corner of Section 9, Township 5 South, Ra ng e 68 West of the 6th Prir.cipal Meridian; thence N 0 2° 52' 34" W a distance of 605 .84 feet, mor e or less, to the TRUE POINT Of BEGINNING; thence S 89 ° 52' 53" Ea distance of 25.96 feet, mo re or less, to the po i nt of termi nus . I. Any construction contemplated or performed under this 1 icen se shall comply with and conform to standards formulated by the Director of Util i t i es of the City and such construc ti on shal 1 be performed and com pleted according to the plan and wi th i n the to lerances gi ven on the Ci ty 's drawings, co p i e s of which are attached hereto and ma de a pa rt hereof. 2 . The Licensee sha l l no t ify t h" Ci ty 's Dire c tor of Ut11 i t i es, at least three ( 3) days prior to the ti me of comnencement of the co nstruction o f, or any repairs made to, Licens ee 's on e (1) 8 " DU CTI LE IRON WA TE R PIPE the reof so, that the City ma y i n i t s d isc retion i nspect such o perat i on s. 3. With in f i fteen (15 ) days from date of the commen cement of construct i on o f s aid on e (I ) B" DUC TILE JORN WATER PIPE the Li cen see sh a ll complete such construction, and s hall c lear t he cross i ng area of a ll cons truct i on debr is and r e store t he area to i t s p rev i ous cond ition as near a s ma y be r es t o rable . In the event the c lea ri ng a nd r e s torat ion of the crossing area is not comp lete within the t ime spe ci fied, the City may comple te the work at the so le expense of the Li censee . 4 . The Ci ty s ha ll ha ve the ri ght to maintain, insull, repair , remove or re 1 ocate t he City Ditch o r any o t her of its f ac ii It I es or ins ta 11 at ions within the City 's rig ht -of-way , at any time and in such manner as the City deems necessary or convenient. The City reserves the exclusive right to control all easemen t s and installations. In the event the one (I) 8" DUCTILE IRON WAT£R PIPE should interferP. with ony future use of the City's right-of-way by the Ci t y, the Licensee shall, upon request and at its sole expense , relocatt, rearrange, or remove its installotions so as not t o interfere with any suc h use. • I • • ( ( • • • • 5. Any repair or re p lac ement of any City installation ma de necessary, in the opinion of the City's Director of Utilities, because of the construction, utilization, repair, replacement or maintenance of the one (I) 8" DUCTILE IRON WATER PIPE or other a1 purtenant installations thereof, shall be made at the sole expense of the Licensee . 6 . The stipulations and co nditions of this License shall be incorporated into contract specifications if the construction herein authorized is to be done on a contract basis . 7 . The rights and privileges granted in this License shal 1 be subject to prior Agreements, Licenses and /or grants, recorded or unrecorded, and it shall be the Licensee's so 1 e res pons i bil ity to determine the existence of said documents or conflicting uses or installations. 8 . The Licensee shall contact and fully cooperate with the City's ditch foreman and the crossing shall be made wi thout interference with any lawful, usual or ordinary flow of water through the City Ditch . Licens ee shall assume all risks incident to the possible presence of such water, or of storm waters, or of surface waters in the City Ditch. 9. The Licensee will not p 1 ace, nor all ow to be p 1 aced, any manho 1 es, meters or similar appurtenances within the City's rights-of-way for the City Ditch . 10 . All trenches within the City's rights-of-way shall be backfill ed and tamped to the original ground 1 ine in layers not to exceed six (6 ) i nches loose measure to a compact ion of ninety percent (90 %) Standard Proctor Maximum Density . 11. Licensee, by acceptance of th is license, expressly assumes full and strict liability for any and all damages of every nature to persons or property caused by water from the ditch leaking through, or break i ng through, the ditch bank or banks at the point or po i nts where the Licensee performs any work in connection with the cross i ng provided by this Licensee. 12 . Licensee shall indemnify and save harmless the City, its off i cers and employ ees, against any and all claims, damages, act i ons or causes of action and expenses to which it or they may be su bjec ted by reason of s aid one (1) 8" DUCTILE IRON WATER PI PE being with in and across the premises of the City or by reason of any work done or omission made by Licensee , i ts agents or employees, in connect ion wi th the construction, rep 1 a cement, maintenance or repair of said installation. 13. It is expressly agreed that in case of L 1censee's breach of any of the within promises, the City may, at its option, have specific performance thereof, or sue for damages resu It ing from such breac h . 14. Upon abandonl!l(:nt of any right or privilege herein granted, the right of Licensee to that eitent shall terminate, but its obl ig•tlon to 1nd em n1fy and save harmless the City, its offilers ond emplo1ees , shall not terminate in any event , for acts of Licensee octurri11g prior t u termination of this License. • I • • ( • • • • In g1011ti11y the abuvc •uthoriza t10n, the City reserves the nylol tu 111a~t full use of the prop.rty involve d as may be necessary or conven1em in tile oper·a t 1 on of the water works p lont an d sys tern ur1der the contra 1 of the C it1 . IN WITNES S WHEREOF, t111 s ins trun .. !llt hds been e•ecu ted as of t ht day a rod ycor first above written . Al'PROVEO: CITY OF ENGLEWOOO act i 119 through and by its Water Advisory Board 01 rector of Ut l1 it ies Cha1 rman LESLI [ N. JOHNSON ATTEST : • I • • - ( • ----- N B'!o~,·~1•E 130.78° 'I I \ '-.I I I I ... ~ I I,~ I I ~ I ~ !14"1.D. I I CONC. PIPE I I ·"' " I •"'· II N89°56':SO"W 132 .64' \ \ \ \ \ \~~ \ . '~· ,~. , .. '~'ti \ii. ' \ \ ' \ \ PLAN SCALE 1• .. ~· SE CORNER~ THE 5£ 1/4,SW 1/4, SEC 9, T!IS ,II 6IW 1 6t~ PM "' . ... .. Or N 0 0 0 z \ \ \ \ W 8 Fl LtV~VE ____ • • • I I I I I I I I I I 4.7&' I I' I ., .1 I ., 'I !:' I. ~ t I -7·eaa'' " "'>17:08 ''1'. I I ., I I I I I I I I I I I I so' I I 30' i I~ I I I -:I ~I .,I ,.;I 2\ t !'1 . I • ~I~ -~ -~1 ~I % 0 • • ~1 8 1 ~8 zl zl •z I :r DETAIL I I I"' SCALE ' 1":20 ' I 1 I I I I I I I I 11 11 \I, 11 1' ,1 ,1 I I THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD I • UTILITIES DEPARTMENT • I I TO EOUITY CONCEPTS FOR WATER MAIN CROSSING OF CITY DITCH AT SOUTH WINDERMERE STREET ' BELLEVIEW & WINDERMERE SUBDIVISION . ' SURVEY NO O~TE DEC I, 1914 \ \ SHEET I OF I \ \ APP. __ CR __ l uo --·"'M • ( • RESOLUTION NO. I SERIES OF 1985-- • • • A RESOLUTION ro REXX11MEND ro THE DEPAR'IMENI' OF CORREx::TIONS, THE OOVERNOR AND LEGISLATURE OF COLORADO 'ro APPROVE AND SITE A N&I CORROCTIONAL FACILITY ON STAT E LAND LOC:ATED AT THE LCMRY BCl1BING RANGE. WHEREAS, the final SLITlllary report of the DRCOG Jail Needs Task Force work in 1983 identified housing costs for state prisoners in county jails to be approximately $1.6 million per year. 'nle task force report also iooicated five of the six metro counties are currently transporting approximately 6 ,000 state prisoners a year to aoo fran facilities at canon City aoo Buena Vi sta; aoo WHEREAS, the Denv e r Reg i onal Coun ci l of Goverrrn e nts created a Corrections Facility Si t ing Task Force i n Augu s t of 1984 t o locate a site in the metropolitan area for formal recamieooation by DRCOG; aoo WHEREAS, the Task Force, as a result of work in deve loping a correctional facility s i t e proposal , recamieooed DRCOG's forma l approval and support for the correct ional facil i ty s i te proposal for laoo in the Lowry Banb i ng Range; aoo WHEREAS, the State Board of Laoo Carmissioners has assi sted in identifying this state laoo; NCM, 'lllEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY 'lllE CITY COOOCIL OF 'lllE CITY OF ENGL~OOD, COLORADO: Section 1. 'nlat Ci ty Council r ecamierrl s that the Department of Corrections, the Governor and Leg i s lature of the State of Colorado a pprove and s ite the new correctiona l faci lity on state laoo i n the Lowry Banb ing Rang e ; Section 2 . 'nlat soch a new corrections facility at the Lowr y s ite contain a diagnostic init so as to maximize benefits to the public and the facility itself; Section 3. 'nlat a specific site selection be determined by the affected-parties. AOOPl'ED AND APPROVED the 7th day of January, 1985. Attest : &lgene L. Otis, Mayor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer • I • • - ( • • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the foregoing is a canplete, true and accurate copy of lesolution No. __ , Series of 1985. Gary R. Higbee • I • • ( • C 0 U N C I L DATE January 3 , 1985 • • • C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM 11 F SUBJECT Taxi Coupon Service INITIATED BY City Manager ACT I ON PRO POSED ___ Reccmre ___ naa_t_i_· on __ to_a_pp_ro_v_e_a_Re_so_l_u_u_· o_n_tr_an_s_f_e_r_r _i _ng_$_l_o_,_o_oo_ fran the General Fund Reserve to the Parks and Recreation Senior Citizen Recreat ion Account BACKGROUND On December 17 , 1984 Ci ty Council pa s sed Reso l ution No . 51 a mending the 1985 Budget and s ett i ng aside $1 0,000 f or a Taxi Coupon Se r vice t o replace the Senior Surrey . The program which has been placed under the control o f the Malle y Senior Re c reation Center was i mplemented January 1, 1985 and will cont i nue on a trial basis through Decemb e r 31, 198 5 . Se rv i ce wi l l be limi t ed to Englewood seniors ov e r a ge 65 who meet cer t ain i ncome c r i t e r ia and to h a nd icappe d residents who cannot drive. Th e City will purchase pre-printed coupon books (each valued at $20 .00) from the Yellow Cab Company over the course of the year. The Ci t y will in turn sell the books to eligible persons for $5 .00. Each eligible person will be limited to one coupon book per month and the books will be sold until the supply runs out. The budgeted amount will buy 500 coupon books. Through their sale, the City will see a return of $2,500 through which an additional 125 books may be purchased. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council approve the attached Resolution transferring $10,000 from the General Fund Reserve to the Parks and Recreation Senior Citizens Recreation account for the Taxi Coupon Service. • I • - ( • ( • RFSOLlJI'ION NO.~ SERIE.S OF 1985-- • • • A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE GENERAL FUND. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, approved the taxi chip progrcm by Resolution No. 51, Series of 1984, on Decanber 17, 1984; and WHEREAS, said Resolution was adopted after the 1985 budget has been canpleted; and WHEREAS, the senior citizen recreat ion account will need $10,000 for the taxi coupons; and WHEREAS, the Treasurer has certified that there is a sufficient cash surplus to meet the appropriation; t-Di, 'rnEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED BY 'rnE CITY COUOCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGL~, COLORAOO, as follows: Section 1. 'Itle following appropriation is hereby made: Source of E\lnds General E\lnd Reserve Appropriation Senior Citizen Recreation (Account No. 02-79-31931) $10,000 $10,000 Section 2. 'Itle City Manager and Director of Finance are hereby authorized to make the above changes to the 1985 budget for the City of Englewood. AOOPI'EO AND APPROVED this __ day of January, 1985. Attest: Eugene L. Otis, Mayor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer • I • • - • \. • • • • I Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Ei'lglewooa, Colorado, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of Iesolution No. , Series of 1985. - Gary R. Higbee • I • • ( December 12, 1984 Mr. Andy Mccown City Manager City of Englewood 3400 S. Elati Englewood, Colorado 80110 Dear Mr. Mccown: • • • ·;1 r! I l .... ~J' i1 """""" ,i..-.i -' !...'GOVERNMENT FINANC E 0 F. :_ l 7 198 4 CITY r.rn N.~ll~f :, U ~fl t;E EN GLEWOOD O FFI CER S AS SOCI ATI ON We are pleased to notify you that your comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1983 qualifies for a Certi- ficate of Conformance in Financial Reporting. The Certificate of Confor- mance is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomp- lishment by a government and its management. When a Certificate of Conformance is awarded to a government an Award of Financial Reporting Achievement is also presented to the individual designated by the government as primarily responsible for its having earned the certificate. Enclosed is an Award of Financial Reporting '\chievement for: City of Englewood Finance Department The Certificate of Conformance will be shipped under separate cover in about six weeks. We hope that you will arrange for a formal presentation of the Certificate and Award of Financial Reporting Achievement, and that appropriate publicity will be given to this notable achievement. A sample news release is enclosed. We suggest that you provide copies of it to the local newspapers and radio and television stations. We hope that this example will encourage other government officials in their efforts to achieve and maintain an appropriate standard of excel- lence in financial reporting. If you have any questions regarding this matter, or if we may be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION \ . ._:I 02:-R,__ ~id R. Bean Ass istant Director/Governmental Accounting Programs ORB/p p Encl o s ures JORMEOLV fl<! ""-"'IC""''*'"'° OfACl.l!S ASSOCWION DC •.IOO.Je •20'146o 20<4 • • I • • • • • • The Municipal Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada presents this 0 AWARD OF FINANCIAL REPORTING ACHIEVEMENT to : CITY OF ENGLEWOOV FINANCE DEPARTMENT CITY OF ENGLEWOOV, COLORADO '11te Award of Financial Reporting Achievemmt is presented by the Municipal Finance Off1t:ers A11oclation to those individ....ls who ha11t bem instn.mmtal in tmir go11tmmental unit achievin( a C-tificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting. A Qrtificate of Conformance is presented to those go11emmmtal units whose comprehensi11t anmuJ fi"""<wl reports (CAF R ~) are judged to substantially conform to program stand4rds. Execvti11e Director ~ ;{ ~ Dote VecembeA 11, 1984 • • ( r ( • • • • RESOLUTION NO . c5 SERIES OF 1985 __ _ A RESOLUTION FSTABLISHING ANNUAL SALARY FOR PARAL~ BEVERLY J. BRIZEE FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1985. WHEREAS, the City Council, by Olarter, may adopt a Resolution authorizing payment of annual s a laries for anployees; ~. niEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'THE CITY OF ENGLE)olOOD, COLORADO I as follows: '!he following annual s alary is hereby established for the following anployee for the calendar year 1985, retroactive to January 1, 1985, to wit: Beverly J. Brizee. Paralegal • $28,404 ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 7th day of January I 1985. Eugene L. Otis, Mayor Attest: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above is a true, accurate and canplete copy of Resolution No • ..,j_ , Series of 1985. -- Gary R. Higbee I • • ( • RESOLUTION NO.~ SERIES OF 1985 • • • A RESOLUTION FSTABLISHING ANNUAL SALARY FOR ASSISTANT CITY A'M'ORNEY CHARLES C. GRIMM FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR 1985. WHEREAS , the City Coun cil , by Oiarter , may adopt a Resolution authorizing paym ent of annual s alaries fo r an ployees; NOfl, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVE u BY THE CITY COUN::IL Of THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO, as follows: The following annual salary is hereby established for the following anployee for the calerxjar year 1985 , retro active to Janua ry 1, 1985, to wit : Charles c. Gril!l'll • Assistant City Attorney • $30 ,800 ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 7th day of January, 1985 . Eug ene L. Otis , Mayor Attest : ex offic io City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of t he City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above is a true, accurate arxj canplete copy of lesolution ~ • ...±__, Series of 1985. Ga ry R. Higbee • I • • • C !TY Of EN6L£WO OD 1984 S~L E S AN n US[ !A r I UDG[T 10 COl lECllOH • • • /\T~'A C HM ENT A ----------------------198 3 6ENHA _ FU~D----------------------------------------1984 &EllE RA L FUllO ------------------- TOTA ->: 1034 1 00~.o o mmz.oo -.06 -5e5se s .oo : 10605000.00 me109J,oo .07 776093.1)()' 16259al .oo .17 -------------------------------------------------------------:----------------------------------------------------:----------------- Tom TOTA L SALES ----JUD 6ET ----ACCUllllAm : TOTAL TOTAL SA ES ----IUDGET ----AC CUNULATEO :---t'UR TO TEllft --llOll TH SA LH I USE USE TA X --JIFFERE•c r --llFFERENCE : SALES/USE US E TA Y. --DIF FERE NCE-· l lFFEREICE : CllAll6£ TA X JUDGn COLLECTEV AllOLlllT W IU!GET COLLECTED AllOU NT ' AllOUlil -------------------------------------------------------------: ----------------------------------------------------: ----------------- IAIUA" 1428094.00 1428230.00 m.oo o.oo 136.oo : 1506700 . 00 1527237' 00 18537. 00 .01 18537.0 0: 9900 7.00 .07 FEI RUAP I 655 085.00 664309 .00 9224 . 00 .01 936 0.00 : 709470. 00 676341. 00 -33129 .00 -.05 -14592. oo : 1203 2.00 .oz IA RCH 639 C'9 .00 588942 .00 -5om.oo -.oe -40"77. 00' 649595 . 00 69 2639. oc 4J044. 00 .07 2845 2. oo: 103697.00 .18 AP RIL 970 01 3.00 931727. 00 -382 86.0 0 -.04 -79063.00 : 101 04J5.00 1256865.00 2464JO.OO .24 2748 82. oo: 325138. 00 .JS m 707503 .00 651978.00 -55525.00 -.09 -mm.oo: 714995.00 798444. 00 8J44 9.00 .12 358331.0o : 146466.00 .22 IUll E nmz.oo 639452.00 -84910.00 -.12 -2m9a.oo : 71 6705.00 740l8 0. 00 23675.00 .OJ 35200 6. oo: 100928.00 .16 IUtr 1079616.00 1os1J~.oo -21262 .00 -.02 -24 07 60. 00 : 1147270 .00 llJ7015.00 -1om.oo -.01 mm .oo: 716 61. 00 .07 AU6UST 7206'9.0G 702977.00 -17772.00 -.02 -~J2.oo : 748800 . 00 8J6486. 00 87686 .00 .12 459437.oo : lll559.00 .19 SEPTEIQEP 76'506.00 mm.oo -mm.oo -.15 -373266 .00: 753765.00 775476 .00 21711.00 .OJ 4El148 .IO : 120704 .00 .18 DClOIU 104~.oo 1030941.00 -14144.IO -.OJ -387410.00: 1087195.00 1268737.00 180842.00 .17 6'1no .oo : 237796 .00 .23 llOYUJfR 74I09J.OO 'nm.oo -7'5Jl9.00 -.10 -467729.oo: 748~5.00 141460 .00 n11s.oo .12 755105. oo: 1"'86.00 .25 I IECElllER 153865.00 730706.oo -mm.to -.14 -58'HS.OO : 109025.IO IJOOIJ.DO 20988.00 .03 77609J.oo : "307.00 .14 m FUO S o.oo o.oo 1.00 o.oo -585818.oo: .. .. ·~ 1.1 : o.oo .. I 1984 &A LES TA X JUD6£T IS 2." AIOVE TH£ 1'83 IUKrT • I • - • • DH . JI, 1984 C Jn Of £N6LEVOO D USE TA X I UOGET TO COLL ECTION • • • ATTACHMEN T B ---------------·-----Im l'UILIC JllPROVENE KT flJfj0-------------------------1984 PUlllC llll'ROVEll£NJ FUllD ------------- TO AlS: 774000.0 0 1667J2 .00 .12 9273 2.00 : nsooo. o~ 1162Bl8.00 .60 437138.00 : 296106 .00 .34 -------------------------------------------------------------:----------------------------------------------------:----------------- TDUL TOTAL SALES ----IUD6£1----ACCU"ut ATED : Tom TO TAL SALES ----IU0 6t T----ACCllll UL ATED ;---TU R TO TEAP.--llOM TH SALE S/USE USE TAX --llFFEREllCE--llFFERENCE : SALES/USE USE TA Y. --DIFFERENCE--JIFFERENCE : CIWKiE m IUKET COLLEcm AllDIJll T TAX IUDGEl COLLECTED AllOUN T ' AllDUll T -------------------------------------------------------------: ----------------------------------------------------:----------------- J~N UARY 41100.00 63891.00 16791.00 .36 16791.oo : 4tt95.0D 57176. 00 1081.00 .16 8081.00 : -6715.0 0 -. II FEIR UARY 5130 2.00 48013. 00 -3m.oo -.06 13502.00 : 43360. DD 5249 7. 00 9137.0 0 .21 172 18.00 : 4484.00 .09 NAP CH 56500.00 63575. 00 70 5. OD .13 2osn.oo : 54'45.0 0 908 64.00 35919.00 .65 53137.oo : 2721 9.00 .4l I AP RIL 82 826. 00 47269.0~ -13559.00 -.4l -14982.00 : 60565. Ou 68 174 .00 7609.00 . Jl .a746.00 • 209 05.00 .44 "A r 61466 . 00 63223. 00 1755 .00 .03 -13227.0D: s.m .oo 120502.00 65822. 00 I. 20 126568 .00 : 57279.00 .91 JUN E 7153 >.oo 607JJ .OO -1oe2uo -.15 -24052.00 : 66235. 00 77780.00 JJ545.00 .17 llBm.oo : 17069.00 .25 J UlT 67006 . 00 65406.00 -1600 . oo -.o; -25652.0Ci: 645~.oo 141029 .00 76444.00 1.18 21455 7.00 : 75623 .00 1.16 AU6US 6646 0. 00 I0009.00 13!149.00 .20 -12103.oo : 62m.oo 128687. 00 6595 .oo J.05 280514.0 0: 41678.00 .61 sEPmm 86816 .00 J1769V.OO JG86 3. 00 .36 u1ao.oo : 1mo.to 94494. DO 7'14.00 .OS 21 72i . oo : -23205.00 -.20 : OC TDm 67230.00 "574.DO 1344 . 00 .12 21124.oo : 67015. 00 mm.oo "575. 00 J. 44 JMJOJ .oo: 11016.00 1.16 IDVEl!IU 6534 2.00 6l7711.00 -1564.to -.02 25560.00 : 6lnD.OO 97548 .to 3'198.00 .5' 420501. IO : 33770.00 .53 I 1£cmu 5041 2.00 IJ7514.00 '7171 .IO 1.33 'm2.oo: 53160. 00 70497.00 1733 7.00 .33 4l713i .to: -47017.00 -.40 llA FUllD S o.oo o.oo t.oo o.oo •2732.00 I II.I .. II.I 11.1 : o.oo IA f 1'184 US E TA X IUMrT IS 16. 3Jl I IELOll TllE 1983 IUIGET • I • - • • • • J\TTA llMCNT C DEC . 31 J9 84 C ITT Of EN&LEVDOD 1'84 SA LES All D us r TAT IUt!i rl TD COLLECTlOli 1Jf84 REVIS£0 IU»6 £.I -------------------· --198 3 &DUAL FUllO ----------------------------------------1 '84 &E•ERAl FIMD -------------------- TO AlS: J034 JOO O.OO 97:i ~I J2.00 -.0 6 -58588 8.oo: 1130m4 .00 1138 109l.OO .OJ 7455 9.00 : J625981. DO • J7 -------------------------------------------------------------: -----------------------------------------------------: ----------------- TO TAL TOTAL SALE S ----JUD6 £T----ACCUW'JUTED : TOT AL TOTAL SALES ----IUOGET-----ACCUllULATEO :---YEAR TO TEAR--llOll TH SALES /USE US E TAX --llFFERDCE--llFFERElltE : SALES /USE US E TAX --llFFERENLE ---DIFFERENCE : tffAllG E TAX JUIS ET COLLECTED llll OUM TAX IUIGET COLLECTED AllilUN ; All OUll i -------------------------------------------------------------: -----------------------------------------------------: ----------------- JAM UA0 J 428 0•4 . O!l 1426230 .00 J36.00 o.oo J36 .00 ' 152~:J7 .00 J5272 37 . 00 o.oo 0.00 o.oc: 9900).00 .O J FE!PUm 655oss oi 6 ~430 9 .oo 9224 .00 .OJ mo .oo : 676341. 00 67634 J .OO o.oo o.oo o.oo : J2 032.00 .02 m e 63j 079.00 5Bf94 2,00 -)OJ 37.oo -.oe -40 777.oo: 69263 9.00 692 639 .00 o.oc o.oo o.oo : 10li9 .oo .16 AP RIL 9700J3.00 mm.oo -38286.00 -.04 -79063.00 : 12S6865.00 J256865.00 o.oo o.oo o.oo: 325136.00 .35 "~ 707503. 00 651'78 .00 -55525.o o -.oe -ll45S 8.00: 79844 •.o o 798444.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 ' 146466.0 0 .2' JUN E n m ;. oo 63 94 52' 00 -emo.oo -.J2 -21me.oo : 74 037 E. 00 740380.00 2.00 o.o c 3.00 : J0 09 2i.OO .16 JULY 10 79616.00 1058 354.00 -21262.00 -.02 -24 0;~0 .o o: 1mm.oo lll7015.00 0.00 o.oo 3.0Ci : 7S06J.OO .07 AU6 US 7206'9.00 70292 7. 00 -17772.00 -.o z -~532 .0 0 , 836486.00 136486.0G o.oo o.oo 1.00 : lll551.00 .19 SEPTElllER 76'506 .00 654772.DO -114734.00 -.15 -3732'6 . OG : 77$475.10 7754 76.00 1.00 o.oo 4.oo: 1207@4.00 .JS OCTOIE' 1045085.00 1'30'41.00 -14144.IO -.O J -38 7410.0 C: 1166460 .00 1268737.00 J02277.00 ·°' 102211.00 : 237796.IO .23 IOl'DIE~ 740093. 00 mm.at -75319.00 -.JG -442729.oo: 12108Cl.OO 1414'G.llO 2G3IO .OO .02 1226'1.00 : 1'86U.IO .25 1Em1u 9'3865.00 7J0 706 .oo -mm.oo -.14 -"'811.00 : 171115.10 llDOll.00 ·41102.00 -.05 74559 .oo : '9307.IO .14 U A FIM DS o.oo 0.00 o.oo 0.00 ·5n888.00: IA llA IA u : O.IO llA THE 1984 REl'ISEZ SA LES TAX IUD&ET IS 6.6' UO VE THE lll l &l llAL 1984 IUKE T AU 15 .fl AIOVE 111£ 1913 ACTUAL &AUS lax tolutTIOIS . • I • • • DEt. 31,19 84 c l1Y or EN GL EWO OD US[ TA X • • • IU06ET TD COLLECTION 11 m Rt:VI SEO IUDGE!I AT Tl\C ll MU~T D ---------------------1'183 l'UILIC lllPR OVENENT FUN 0-------------------------1984 PU BLIC IN~ROVEllEN T FUllD ------------- TOTAU ; 7740 00 .00 166732 .0 0 . " 92 73 2.00: 105000 0.00 116283 8.00 • JI JJ28 38. OO: 2961 06 . 00 .3• -------------------------------------------------------------:----------------------------------------------------:----------------- ro m TOTA L SA LES ----IUD 6El----mURULATEI : TOTAL TOTAL SALE S ----IUDGET----ACCUllUL Am :---THR TO TUR --RON TH SALES/USE USE TA X --tIFF Emn--DIFFERE NCE : SA LES/USE USE TAX --llFFERENCE --l l FFEREN CE I CHAN GE TAX IUD6ET COLLECTED A"OUNT I TAX IUtGET COLLECTED HOUN T ' MllUNl ----------.. --------------.. -----.. -.. -.... -------------------.... -.. -: ----.... -------.. -----------.... --.... -.. -.... -.. ----------.... --: .... --.. -----.. --.. --- 1AMUAR I' 471 00.00 63 891.00 16791.00 .3 6 16791.00: 57176.0 0 57176.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo : -6715.00 -.11 FEBR UAF Y 5130 2. OD 480 13.00 -3289.00 -.06 13502.0D! 5249 7 .oo 52497. 00 o.oo 0.00 o.oo : 4484.0 0 .09 N~R C~ 565 00. 00 635 75. 00 70 75. 00 .13 20 577 .oD: 9086 4. 00 '0864. DO 0.00 o.oo o.oo: 2728 9.00 .43 APRIL 82 828. 00 47269.00 -35559.00 -.43 -14982.oo : 681 74.0 0 68174.0 0 o.oo o.oo o.oo: 209 05.00 .44 RA Y 614 66.00 632 23.00 1755.00 .03 -1m1.oo : 120502.00 120m.oo 0.00 0.00 O.D o: 57279.00 .91 JUN E 7153 6. 00 60 7JJ.OO -10825 .00 -.15 -24052.00 : 77780.0 0 7778 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo : 1706 9.00 .28 1UlY 670 06 .0D 65406.0 0 -1600.00 -.02 -256 52 .00 : 141029. 00 14102 9.00 0.00 o.o o o.oo: 756 23.00 l .16 MJi UST 6646 0.00 IOOOf.00 mo.oo .20 -12103 .00: 128667 . 00 128687. 00 o.oo o.oo o.oo: 486 78. 00 .6 1 S£PTU IER '6816.00 1176,,. 00 3088 3.00 .36 11110.00 : '4494 .00 ,4494 . 00 0.00 o. 00 o.oo: -23205.00 -.20 OCTOIER 67230 .00 75:174.00 8J44.IO .12 27124.00 : 7876 7. 00 umo.oo 14823.00 J.M 14123.oo : 81016.00 l. J6 llOVERIER 65 342.00 63778 .00 -1564.tO -.02 25560.00 : 74391.00 ,7548 . 00 2JU7.00 .31 107980 . oo : 33770.00 .53 IECUIE R 50412.00 JJ7'514 .00 mn .oo 1.3l '2n2.oo: 6563'. 00 704 97.00 4858.00 .07 112831 .00: -4708 7.00 -.40 U. FUND S 0.00 0.00 o.oo o.oo 92 732.00: llA llA IA IA : 0.00 IA THE 1984 RE VISED IUKl:T IS 44 .ft AIOV£ TH£ 11116i.Al 1914 1Uti£1 AIU 21 .IS UOVE THE ACTUAL 1'83 USE TAX CDl.LECTIDllS. • I • •