The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1985-07-15 (Regular) Meeting Agenda• - • • 0 City Council Meeting -Regular -July 15, 1985 • • • • • • '/J U<t-~0A:. ~ ~ . Jc, 21 I ')l ) e.__ /A-1'~, -?--</ • 0 0 I . • • • - AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY ------- Hladav NeaT Vobe1da Weist Biio Bradshaw Otis MOTION: I . . • • • • • I AGENDA ITEM --~~------PRESENTED BY-------------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain -mQifav .- Neal t--- Vobe1da L---" Weist v 8if0 v-- Bradshaw v Otis t-- MOTION: I • • • • • • - ./ AGENDA ITEM _b=-_tL __ _ PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes N•y Absent AbstaIn Hlgday Neal - VobeJda -v We 1st I Bllo v Bradshaw I Otis I I • • • MOTION: c-yJ tA1 U- • • • • • AGENDA ITEM P RE SENTED B Y -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent AbstaIn Hlgday Neal -Vobe,da j/ Weist v Bl lo / Bradshaw / Otis / • MCYI'ION: po J I • • • • • - AGENDA ITEM I() ~---P RE SENTED B Y -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlgday Neal Vobe,da -Wei s t I <./ Bllo / v--Bradshaw / Otis MOTION: I • • • • - AGENDA ITEM ----- PRESENTED BY ------- ( l_J )/1 t .( !U l'-' t"'.Jl .:;;;;,_";, /</ ~-·'L>" (,_ { {J /V&l'-{d (~,u f' v~s-a q S (}cu lt /../ (L~ ~() ~E._ s ( (u) ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlgday NeaT Vob e 1da Weist v Bi io / ·"' Bradshaw -7 Otis LL MOTION: I . • • • • AGENDA ITEM PRESENTE D BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain liTCiOaY -- (./" Neal -Vobe1da Weist J v--Bllo 7 Bradshaw / Otis I MOTION : ( 1::>1 ·- J I • • • • • AGENDA ITEM ----- Moved Seconded ...... v MOTION: /i) (___X'~~ HIQday Neal Vobe--ida We i st Bi lo Bradshaw Ot i s • • - PRESENTED BY 711 (. t (1 I ?< . ROll CALL Ayes Nay Absent AbstaIn -I / I I . . • • • • . - AGENDA ITEM ~ ~ ~ P RES ENTED B Y -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain HIQ<Iav Neal Vo beida ,._/ Weist / Bllo / J, Bradshaw / Otis 1/ I • • • • • • • AGEN DA ITEM -----PRESENTED BY In (_ c ,u ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlgday - v-Neal - Vobeida - Weist I 4/ Bile Bradshaw I Otis I MOTION: c ~ { • _.- I • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM -----PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlqdav v-Neal - Vobe,da Weist I ,/ Bi lo / Bradshaw / Otis MOTION: I • • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM II ~--PRESENTED BY ('(\ j/1'"- ~/:;'"~ ~ .· <~ ~ /) i. ~~u)-fV1l<V ~ J~ c: L;.jl_ j) -/1_ • jA..t--< 1 x { r J''--( _/-~- _.A-4J v -'-"I.U - Moved Seconded Hlgday Neal _,(- r ; -£ ~ "'J~l?r /u. 1...._, ;(_ 6 ROLL CALL Ayes Nay Absent Vobe1da v Weist Bile v Bradshaw Otis MOTION: (}__ ~ :# + lo . Abstain I . -- AGENDA ITEM ----- Z:fcJ I ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Hlgday Neal Vobe1da Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: • • • • PRESENTED BY ------- L ?"-_., )Li J- ~~ r~-<--r Ayes Nay Absent Abstain --- I / / I • I . • • • AG ENDA ITEM _;__.:;_·b __ _ P RESENTED BY ) } 7 (__ ( /2 t l"-.__ ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent AbstaIn Hlgday Neal -Vobe1da -._....-Weist I Bllo I v Bradshaw I Otis rr MOTION: 0(3-11 ::5 j I . • • • • • AG E NDA ITEM ----- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstai n Hlgday v' Neal Vobe1da Weist Bllo v Bradshaw Otis MOTION: I . • • • • • AGENDA ITEM ----- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain HTQaaY Neal Vobe1da Weist v Bl To v Bradshaw Otis MariON: c{j tf Z { I • • • AGEN DA ITEM Moved Seconded IIVV v v MOTION: <..7 1:;~ cg c ? e (/ <-\ -J " r7 • Hlgday Neal Vobe1da Wei s t Bllo Bradshaw Otis l 4 ROLL CALL • • • PRESENTED BY ------- Ayes Nay Absent Abstain I • • • • • PRESENTED BY lh ( {! ()/ ]l_ ~b:J? j /( a/-a----1'--ca_,e_ 0 -£-~-/._ ~ c.__--/ '( e: 0 D 1-1 fi--u:) J\-( ~LVJ ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlg<lay Neal Vobe1da -_V Weist I Bllo / v Bradshaw / Otis 1/ I . • MOTION : C(J J:t c:~ • • • • - AG ENDA >TEM ~ PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlgday -{./ Neal -Vobe]da - Weis t I ,.., Bi lo / v Brads haw / Otis 1/ I • MOTION : t .t (' I .f L ,- (_/_/ • • • • • • .. - -_,---------------~-___;;" AG ENDA I TEM ----PRESENTED BY ------ j!rtL!-~~~i-'2_-~_ n ~.:>.~~, fLtl~:J-L 1J £c)/d /r rYll p ~~J~) _ ~~ ;) Oz -JLR..J ~) tj/1£-_;;;L ?>\ I 1 T'" ROLL CALL ____- l l:/z I ' dv l I'l l ' /, 4 < ,_,.., r ~_.,___. fl J/1.-<J, .b-"L-0-> /f'.z_ J.-~_ 1..4t: >'--~ ... o..u~ .... ~ Moved Seconded J Ayes Nay Absent Hlqdav -Neal Vobe1d a Weist //" Bi lo v Bradshaw Otls MOTION: ( • (p -/cJ J /U ~ Abstain I • • • • .. • AGENDA I TEM ----PRESENTED BY ------ ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Na Ab y sent Abstain Hladav v Neal Vobe1da v Weist Bi to Bradshaw Otis MOTION: ?le-{1/~ i (=/)Lv<~ fot.-h<> (_ ._1 ){./] /{'~f"" 1/ ( IL · f u 21 -(._ ) ::J ( ( ---I (?rf)! -f /U?. l . 7 l<-I' c.~ ( ,~ u ,, < Ct r A~ • • &v ~ j.t.(•<J /5 )a ~-;(:, ~ ;t lu;( r )<-( ,(~- • • • , . • AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY ;3-r 1 c{.._;;: tc t£ / j' /./<-<-hcl( l_ .. j) I• /I< 'J.- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded A yes Nay Absent Abstain ladav Neal - Vo b eid a - WeTst - Bllo - Bradshaw Otis - MariON: I . • • • • AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlgday v Neal Vo beida Weist J .,...-Bi lo I Bradshaw I Otis I MOTION : .__:_ ~~,;:t 5 I I . • • .. 1. 4. 5. • • • AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL JULY 15, 1985 7:30 P.M. Call to order . 71 Invocation by Dr. Rolland A. Andrews, Grace Baptist Church, 4200 South Acoma Street. Pledge of allegiance by Boy Scout Troop 1151. Roll call. ~~ ~ Minutes. { f ~yz_(l a_ (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of July 1, 1985. I £ • 6. 7. Pre-Scheduled Visitors. (Please limit your presentat ion to 10 minutes.) Non-Sch e duled Visitors. (Please limit your presentation to 5 m i nutes.) 8 . Communicati ons and Proclamations. 9 . Consent Agend a . (a) Ordina n ce on final reading amending the operat i ng ag r eeme n t between the City of Englewood and the URA for the purpose of clarifying relationships and responsi b i l i ties for the Downtown Redevelopment Project . • I • • • • .. - Page 2 July 15, 1985 Agenda 9. Consent Agenda (Continued). (b) Minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of May 21, 1985. (c) Minutes of the Urban Renewal Authority meetings of June 5 and 13, 1985. (d) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meet ing of June 18 , 19 8 5. J \ \ (', Ill'* .., ' \(be (e) Recommendation from the Water and Sewer Board to approve Southgate Sanitation District's Supplement 1106 to annex approximately 10.4 acres to the District. 10. (f) Transmittal of the 1984 Annual Financial Report. Public Hearing. (a) (b) (C) To consider To consider citizens input for the 1986 Budget. A U t1 t;tn, '-?-.c....,w !]l}};, - General Revenue Sharing Funds. '""-(]>-•-:r-- To consider the Ordinance on final reading authorizing the issuance of special assessment bonds in the amount of $856,000 for Paving District No. 30. 11. Ordin a nc e s, Resolutions and Motions. (a) (c) Recommendation from the Fire Department to approve a B il l for an Ordinance expanding the mutual aid agreeme n t between the City of Englewood and the City of Sheridan into an automatic aid agreement and to i nclude a provision for a joint volunteer fire p e rsonnel program. Re commend a t i on from the Public Works Department Director to approve a Bill for an Ordinance amending the mai ntenance contract between the City of Engle- wood and t he Colorado State Highway Department to inc r ease the C i ty's fees for the maintenance of tr a ffic control devices. Recomme nd a t i on from the Water and Sewer Board to approve a Qui t Claim Deed, Reservation of Easement a n d Agreement between the City of Englewood and Ri chard K. and June K. Clark in the amount of $1 2 ,0 00. I • • • • • • Page 3 July 15, 1985 Agenda 11 . Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions {Continued). {d) Recommendation from the Water and Sewer Board to approve a Bill for an Ordinance amending the City's industri al waste pretreatment program in order to comply with federal requirements and to recognize that the Englewood sewer service received treatment from the Metro Denver Sewage Disposal District No. 1. Recommendation from the Community Development Depart- ment to a pprove a Bill for an Ordinance amend ing the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance regarding auto and recreational vehicle sales and lease lots; gas and oil service stations; and adding development requireme nts. Recommendat i on from the Community Development Depart- ment to approve an agreement between the City of Englewood and the Regional Transportation District to install a passenger shelter at South Broadway and Hampden Avenue. 12. City Manager's Report . 13 . City Attorney's Report. 14. Gener a l Discussion. {a) Mayor's Choice. {b ) Council Member's Choice . { i ) Recommendation concerning appointments to Boards and Commissions. ~ ~- \ .. :1£ J <J -' /U. CLf j»< !JJ::fi~~ ~~i~n a g er AM /sb '{)" . , l 71dtr.A 1 -(c . t M 1 L, ~ f (7v fof-i _ c ~~ -=If-~ +, a .,,lhl-d 1 LO I • I • • • • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS City of Englewood, Colorado July 1, 1985 REGULAR MEETING: Th e C ity Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, met in regular session on July 1, 1985, at 7:30 p.m. Mayor Otis, presiding, called the meeting to order. The invocation was given by Reverend Tom McEwen, Grace Evange- lical Luthe ran Church, 4750 South Clarkson Street. The pledge of al- legiance wa s led by Boy Scout Troop 1151. Ma yor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bi lo, Bradshaw, Oti s. Absent: Cou nc i l Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared a quorum present. * * * * * * * Also present were : City Manager McCown * * • Assistant City Manager Vargas City Attorney Olsen Assistant City Manager for Economic Development Powers Assistant Director of Community Development (Planning) D. Rom ans Deputy City Clerk Owen * * • • MAYOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGU- LAR MEETING OF JUNE 17 , 1985 . Council Member Weist seconded the motion . City Manager McCown noted corrections on page 7 . In the last motion on the page "appointment" should be changed to "appoint"; and in the middle of the page "Rutchman" should be changed to "Ru tschman." The corrections were accepted. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradsha w, Ot is . No ne. • I • • - ( • July 1, 1985 Page 2 Absent: • • • Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * There were no pre-scheduled visitors . * * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there were any other visitors. Gary Kozacek, 1260 West Oxford, came forward and discussed his ideas concerning the Oxford interchange proposal. Mr. Kozacek stated by leaving Oxford Avenue at grade, constructing a ramp over Santa Fe and the railroad tracks, and leaving the thoroughfares underneath would eliminate the bridge across Oxford and the need to buy out property owners. Council Member Higday noted Council met with the State Depart- ment earl i er on some other alternatives. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw instructed City Manager McCown to include Mr. Kozacek's suggestion as another alternative for the State to consi- der. Mr. Kozacek offered a side note on how to make the area (Lipan and Oxford) accessible to emergency vehicles. Council Member Bilo stated he would be getting together with residents at that location on Lipan for further discussion. * * * * * * * MAYOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE A PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE MONTH OF SEPTEMBER, 1985 AS "PEACE MONTH." Council Member Weist seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as fol-lows : Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * • I • • ( • • • - July 1, 1985 Page 3 "Consent Agenda" items were: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Ordinance on final reading transferring a one-half interest in the real property at the Bi-City Treatment Plant to the City of Littleton as per agreement. Minutes of the Board of Career Service Commiss i oners meeting of April 4 , 1985. Minutes of the Downtown Development Authority meeting of May 8, 1985. Minutes of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals meeting of May 8, 1985. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of June 4, 1985. Minutes of the Library Advisory Board meeting of June 11, 1985. MAYOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS 9(A)-9(F). Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: 1985 . Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Consent Agenda item (a) was numbered Ordinance No. 39, Series of * * * * * * * COU NCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSI- DER AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHE NSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays : Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Oti s. None . • I • ( • July 1, 1985 Page 4 Absent: • • • Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Assistant Director of Community Development (Planning) Dorothy Romans presented the amendments. In respo nse to Council Member Bilo's questions, Ms. Romans stat- ed barbed-wire fencing would no longer be allowed in the business dis- trict. Ms . Romans entered into the record the notice of public hearing as pub lished timely in the Englewood Sentinel. Ms. Romans discussed a point of clarification on a matter brought to her at tention by Council Member Vobejda concerning the place- ment of trees at 40-feet intervals along the street. Ms. Romans stated staff pr oposed to add the following wording to 16.4-18: "if when a total stree t frontage is divided by 40 feet, there is a rema i nder of 20 feet or more, an additional street tree shall be required ." Ms. Romans gave the option of adding the language at conclusion of this hearing. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw preferred to have the proposed wording reviewed by the Commiss i on for written clarification and inclusion in the ord i nance. Ms. Romans so noted the directive. May or Otis asked if there was anyone in the audience wishing to speak either in favor or against the amendments. There were no further commen ts . COU NC IL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Council Member Higday seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as foll ows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, We ist , Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 40 SERIES OF 1985 BY AUTHORITY • COUNCIL BILL NO. 41 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL I • ( ( • July 1 , 1985 Page 5 • • • MEMBER NEAL AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPREHENS IVE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO 16.4-8, R-3, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENCE DISTRICT; 16.4-10, B-1, BUSINESS DISTRICT; 16.4-11, DESIGN GUIDELINES; 16 .4-1 3 , I-L, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT; 16.4-15, P.O., PLANNED DEVELOPMEN T DIS- TRICT; 16 .4-17, FENCES AND RETAINING WALLS; 16.4-18, LANDSCAPING. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 41, SERIES OF 1985, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Abs e nt: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Vobejd a . The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * MAYOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC llEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN EXPANDING THE BOUNDAR IES OF THE REDEVE LOPMENT AREA AND UPDATING THE TEXT. Counc il Member Nea l seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the v ote re- sulted as follows : Ayes: Nays: Abs ent : Council Members Higday, Neal, We i st, Bilo, Bradsha w, Otis. None . Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Assistant City Manager for Economic Development Susan Pow ers presented the eighth amendment to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan wh ich wo uld expand the boundaries of the area and update the text to reflect the present plan , i.e . street names. Ms. Powers entered into the record the publisher's affidavit for notice of public hearing , Resolut io n No. 10, Series of 1985 passed by the Urban Ren e wal Authority recommending passage of the amendment, Resolution No. 2 , Series of 1985 passed by the Planning and Zoning Commission recom- mending passage of the amendment . • I • ...... ( • July 1, 1985 Page 6 • • .. Ms. Powers noted the criteria for implementing the plan were that City Council found: l) the amendment was necessary and beneficial to the whole, and 2) the area was blighted. Ms. Powers stated appraisals have been ordered and conversations with businesses have been positive. Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone in the audience wishing to speak on this matter. Joe Montana, 1401 -17th Street, attorney for Park Floral, came forward. Mr. Montana discussed his client's request for at least one year lead time to relocate. William Gunesch, 30030 Shady Croft Drive, Littleton, owner of Park Floral came forward and explained his request for a one year minimum was based on the fact there were certain times and conditions for growing plans that would be less disruptive to his business than other times. Mr. Gunesch preferred the first of September or October. In response to a question from Council Member Neal, Mr. Gunesch was not opposed to reasonable offers. Council Member Higday asked the URA's legal counsel, Paul Benedetti, whether or not Council could bind URA with requirements on settling this ma t t er. Mr. Benedetti responded affirmatively. T.W. Anderson, 3798 South Elati, came forward. Mr. Anderson stated he owned property behind Burger King which was included in the new boundar i es. Mr. Anderson stated his willingness to cooperate, and he would wi thhold getting a building permit until a decision was made even though t wo buildings were erected already. Mr. Anderson was not opposed to the i nclusion of his property in the plan. The r e were no further comments. MA YOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Coun- cil Me mber Bil o s e c onded t h e motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as fol low s : Ayes: Nays : Absent: Co u n cil Members Higday, Neal, Weis t , Bilo, Br a dshaw, Otis. None. Counci l Member Vobejda. The May o r declared the motion carried. I • • ( ( • July 1 , 1985 Page 7 RESOLUTION NO. 25 SER IES OF 1985 • • • A RESOLUTION OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL TO AMEND THE ENGLEWOOD DOWN- TOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. MAYOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 25, SERIES OF 1985. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion . Council Member Higday stated he hesitated to stipulate certain co nd i io ns under which the URA could negotiate with Park Floral and as ked if there were provisi ons to pay for loss of business. Assistant City Manager Powers stated loss of business has nev e r been prov ided for in the handbook. Ms. Powers noted there were possibil- i ties for phasing the move. Council Member Neal stated the URA would actually be an aid for the transition. Council Mem ber Higday stated he had faith the URA would work with Park Floral in this matter. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, B il o, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * Assistant Director of Community Development (Planning) Dorothy Romans presented a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 16.4-12, B-2 Business District . Council Member Higday stated the recommendation was in his line of thinking and inquired about making it retroactive. City Atto rney Olsen was to resea rch this question . Council Member Bilo noted his appreciation for the efforts made by the Planning and Zoning Commission and asked Ms. Romans to relay his appreciation to the Commission . • I • • July l , 1985 Page 8 , . • • Council Member Neal asked why make the used car lots a condi- tional use rather than require a license so that revenue could be real- ized to pay for city services which they receive. Ms. Romans stated this would not be in lieu of a licensing fee. The Commission was looking at the land use regulation only. The licens- ing fee could be another issue outside the Commission's scope. Council Member Neal stated he would like to see how enforcement for off-street park i ng would be addressed. Ms. Romans stated these requirements were addressed in existing ord i nances. MAYOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO RECEIVE THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND REQUEST THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PRE- PARE AN ORDI NANCE IN PREPARATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING. Council Member Silo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Silo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared t he motion carried. * * * * * * * RESOLUTION NO. 26 SERIES OF 1985 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENT OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO, TO ISSUE BONDS TO PROVIDE FINANCING FOR A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECT TO BE UNDERTAKEN BY HG, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, THE MANAGING GENERAL PARTNER OF WHICH WILL BE HAMPDEN LTD., AS DESCRIBED HEREIN FOR PERSONS OF LOW AND MIDDLE INCO ME; PRESCRIBING CERTAIN TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH BONDS; AND CONTAINING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT. The resolution was presented by Steve Bell of Hanifen, Imhoff, Inc . Council Member Neal asked that provisions concerning the bene- fits to the City be written in the ordinance. • I • • ( • July 1, 1985 Page 9 • • .. MAYOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 26, SERIES OF 1985. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday , Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * City Manager McCown presented a communication and recommendation for award of a construction contract for Paving District No. 30 to RKS Industries, Inc., the lowest bidder. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO AWARD THE BID FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT FOR PAVING DISTRICT NO. 30 TO RKS INDUSTRIES, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $602,084.91. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * Steve Bell, Hanifen, Imhoff, Inc. presented the results and recommendation of bond bid opening for the special assessment bond issue for Paving District No. 30. Mr. Bell recommended awarding the contract for the purchase of bonds to Kirchner , Moore & Company, the lowest bid- der, for a net interest rate of 8.0496%. Mr. Bell also provided informa- tion specific to certain sections of the council bill authorizing the issuance of bonds. RESOLUTION NO. 27 SERIES OF 1985 A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $856,000, FOR PAVING DISTRICT NO. 30 , IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD • • I • • ( ( • July 1, 1985 Page 10 • • - COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 1985, AWARDING THE PURCHASE TO KIRCHNER, MOORE & COMPANY. Higday seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the as follows: 27, SERIES OF Council Member vote resulted Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Silo, Bradshaw, Otis . None. Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1985 BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 48 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $856,000 OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, FOR PAVING DISTRICT NO. 30; PRESCRIBING THE FORM OF THE BONDS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE BONDS AND THE INTEREST THEREON. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 48, SERIES OF 1985, ON F I RST READING AND TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS COUNCIL BILL FOR MONDAY, J'ULY 15, 1985, AT 7:30 P.M. Council Member Silo seconded the mot io n. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays: Absent: Counc i l Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Silo, Br a dshaw, Ot i s. Non e . Council Mem b er Vobe j d a . Th e Mayor decla r e d the mot i on car ri ed • • • • • • • • Assistant City Ma nage r Powers presented the following counc il bill and n oted an inserti on on pag e 2 o f the supplemental agreemen t . Ms. Po wers stated "En ginee r i ng" was t o be wr i tten in the blank before the word "Department ." • 0 I • • ( • July 1, 1985 Pa ge 11 ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1985 BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR • • • COUNCIL BILL NO. 47 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND THE ENG LEWOOD URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY PROVIDING FOR OPERATING STAFF, EQUIP- MENT , REL ATED SUPPORT AND DEFINING RESPONSIBILITIES. MAYOR PROTEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 4 7 , SERIES OF 198 5 , ON FIRST READING . Council Member Bilo seconded the mot i on. Upon a ca ll of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ay es: Nays: Abs e nt: Counc i l Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Ot i s. None. Counc i l Member Vobejda. Th e Mayor decla r ed the motion carried. City At t orney reques t ed permission to transmit his opin i on on this matter t o the P u b lic Ser vi c e Company. Council so granted • • • • • • • • MAYOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO SET MONDAY, JULY 15, 1985, AT 7 :30 P .M. AS THE PUBLIC HEAR I NG DATE FOR PRE-BUDGET INPUT AND GENERAL REVE NUE SHAR IN G FUND I NP UT FOR THE 1 986 BUDGET. Counc i l Member Neal sec o nded the mo ti o n . Upo n a call o f the ro l l, the vot e resulted a s fo l - lows : Ayes: Na ys: Ab s ent: Council Members Higday , Neal , Weist , Bilo , Bradshaw, Ot i s. None . Council Me mber Vo b ejda . Th e Mayor decla r ed the moti o n ca r ried • • • • • • • • BY AUT HO RITY • 0 I • • ( • July 1, 1985 Page 12 ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1985 A BILL FOR • • • COUNCIL BILL NO. 44 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING RESTITUTION TO BE PAID BY DEFENDANTS FOUND GUILTY OF DAMAGING OR DESTROYING PERSONAL PROPERTY OR OF CAUSING BODILY INJURY OR OTHER DAMAGES TO THEIR VICTIMS. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 44, SERIES OF 1985, ON FIRST READING. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Vobejda. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Council Member Neal instructed the City Manager's office to notify the Court of Council's action on this bill. * * * * * * * There being no further business, COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN. The Mayor declared the meeting adjourned without a vote at 9:30 p.m. • I . - r ( • • • • BY AUTHORITY 9 A ORDI!:WCE 00 • .1/ SERIES CF 1985 COUNCIL BILL NO. 47 Im'ROOOCID BY COUtCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW AN ORDI!:WCE APPROVING AN AGRE»>Em' BE'IWEEN 'mE CITY OF ~000 AND 'mE ENGLDiQOO URBAN ~ AUTHORITY PROVIDING FOR OPERATING STAFF, flJUIPHFNr, RELATED SUPPORT AND DEFINING RESPONSIBILITIES. WHEREAs, the City and the Authority have determined that for purposes of econany and efficiency of operation, it is in the best interests of the public that the operating staff of the Authority be provided by the City through its employees, subject to the terms and conditions of that certain ~rating Agreanent contained in Ordinance No. 9, Series of 1983; and WHEREAs, the Authority and the City desire to clarify the respective duties of the parties with respect to the Englewood Downtown Redevelopnent Plan (the "Urban Renewal Plan") and to supplement the ~rating Agreanent by and between the parties dated February 22, 1983; t«M, 'llfEREFORE, BE IT ORD.\INED BY 'llfE CITY COUNCIL OF 'llfE CITY OF~. CX>LORAOO: Section 1. '1he agreanent entitled "&lpplanent to ~rating Agreanent" (Supplement No. 1) between City of Englewood and the Englewood urban Renewal Authority is hereby approved, a copy of which Agreanent is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. '1he Mayor and ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer are hereby author1zed to sign and attest said Supplement to ~rating Agreanent for and on behalf of City Council and the City of Englewood. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 1st day of July, 1985. Published as a Bill for an Ord inance on the 3rd day of July, 1985. • I • • - ( ( • • • • Read by title and passed on final reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1985, on the 17th day of July, 1985. -- Attest: EUgene L. 0t1s, Mayor ex offic1o C1ty Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Ehglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. __ , Series of 1985. Gary R. Hlgbee • I • • - ( • • • • SUPPLEMENT TO OPERATING AGREEMENT THIS SUPPLEMENT TO OPERATING AGREEMENT dated as of ----- 1985, ("Supplement No. 1") is made by and between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, a municipal corporation and home rule charter city organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of Colorado (the "City"), and the ENGLEWOOD URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY, a body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado (the "Authority"). RECITAL: The Authority and the City desire to clarify the respective duties of the parties with respect the EnglewOOd Downtown Redevelopment Plan (the "Urban Renewal Plan") and to supplement the Operating Agreement by and between the parties dated February 22, 1983. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and other gOOd and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Utility Relocation in Urban Renewal Project. The parties acknowledge and agree that under the approvals of the Urban Renewal Plan given by th e C ity, a ll mat ters involving public utilities in the Urban Renewal Area are under th e dire c t s uperv ision and control of the City and are to be governed by appli cable f ranchise agreements by and between the City and the respective public utility co mpanies or by common law ; and, further, that the City agrees that all requests, directives, commu ni- cations and orders to be issued to or directed to any public utility in conn ection with t he e xe cution of the Urban Renewal Plan shall be the sole respons ib ili t y of t he Cit y • I • ( ( • • • • acting by and through the Department. It is the intention of the part ies ------ that, as between the City and the Authority, the City shall be responsible for carrying out any and all utility relocation, upgrading, installation modification or any other matter requiri ng action or activity by any public utility operating within the area covered by the Urban Renewal Plan. Section 2. Effect of Supplement. Except as supplemented and clarified by this Supplement No. 1, the Operating Agreement by and between the City and the Authority dated February 22, 1983, shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: ATTEST: City Clerk (SEAL) Secretary (SEAL) CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO By---------~~~-------------Mayor ENGLEWOOD URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY By _______ ~~~~------------Chairman -2- • 0 I • • • ( • • • WATER AND SEWER BOARD May 21, 1985 Regular Meeting 9 B 1 The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. Chairman Best declared a quorum present. Members present: Members absent: Also present: Vobejda, Best, Resley, Fullerton, Gulley, Higday, Otis Thompson, Lay Stewart Fonda, Director of Utilities Jane Coleman 3901 S. Galapago Mr. Feagin, 3895 S. Elati Mrs. Robert Perdew, 3990 S. Galapago Mr. Ronald Blatchley, Blatchley & Assoc. 1) CITY DITCH AT FOX AND MANSFIELD. Jane Coleman presented a petition to the Board for fencing and partial piping of the City Ditch at Fox and Mansfield. Jane Coleman, Mr. Feagin and Mrs. Perdew presented the concerns of the citizens, parents and property owners regarding the City Ditch at this location. The Board recommended the petition be forwarded to Council. The Board discussed piping one or two sections of the Ditch at this location to get the open section away from the street, rebuilding the street and putting in a fence to lessen the dangerous situation. Mayor Otis moved; Ms. Gulley seconded: Ayes: Nays : Me mbers absent : Motion carried. To give the Director of Utilities the authority to design facilities to correct the problem of the City Ditch located at Fox and Mansfield and to make a recommendation to City Council for construction when the Ditch is shut down in November. Vobejda, Best, Resley, Fullerton, Gulley, Higday, Otis None Thompson, Lay Pag e 1 of 4 • I • • • • • .. r r 3 ) RON BLATCHLEY -HISTO RIC WA TER US E STU DY AND THE NON-TRIB UTA RY GROUND WATER STUDY. Ron Blatchley discussed his proposed Historic Water Use Study and Non - Tributary Ground Water Study with the Board . The reasons and potential uses of the studies were discussed. Mr. Blatchley also reviewed the cost of the studies and how these figures were reached . The Board recommended Mr. Blatchley attend the next available Council Study Session to explain the proposed studies to the City Council. The Board expressed interest in being notified of the upcoming study session. Ms. Gulley moved> Mayor Otis seconded : Ayes : Nays : Members absent : Motion carried . To recommend to Council a study session to examine Ron Blatchley's Historic Water Use Study and the Non-Tributary Ground Water Study . Vobejda , Best, Re s ley, Fullerton , Gulley, Hig day, Otis None Thompson, Lay 2) VI CTOR BOWEN-OWNER OF 30 29 S. GRANT. Mr. Bowen appeared to discuss the situat i on created when, after removin g a patio in his yard, a part of the City Ditch retaining wall collapsed in the section running through his property. Mr. Bowen presented pictures of th e Di tch. Mr . Bowen requested assistance from the City in correcting t he situat i on. The Board stated Mr . Bowen could be a ssis ted wi t h s andb agg ing, t em porarily patching or shutting dow n the ditch for repairs, but could not be assisted with piping the Ditch . Mr . Don Fu l lerton excused himself and left at 6 :03 p.m. 4 ) MI NUTES OF THE APRI L 9, 1985 MEETING . The Engl ew ood Wat e r and Sew er Boa r d mi nute s of the Apr il 9, 19 85 mee t i ngwere a ppro ved a s wri tten. Mr . Hig day mo ved ; Page 2 of 4 • I • • • ( Ms. Gulley seconded: Ayes: Nays: Members absent: Motion carried. • • .. To approve the April 9, 1985 meeting minutes as written. Vobejda, Best, Resley, Fullerton, Gulley, Higday, Otis None Thompson, lay 5) GRANT OF WATER LINE EASEMENT FOR CAMDEN PLACE I LOCATED AT W. GRAND AVE. BETWEEN S. ACOMA AND S. DELAWARE ST. Stewart Fonda reviewed the request for Grant of Water line Easement for Campden Place I. Mr. Fonda noted the water line in the proposed easement would create a desirable water main loop through to Belleview. Mr. Higday moved; Mr. Vobejda seconded : Ayes: Nays: Members absent: Motion carried. To recomm end to Council approval of the Grant of Water line Easement for Ca mden Place I. Vobejda, Best, Resley, Fullerton, Gulley, Higday, Otis None Thompson, lay 6) LETTER FROM RICHARD CLARK DATED APRIL 24, 1985. Mr. Fonda explained Mr. Clark's letter regarding 1504 Cottonwood lane. Mr. Clark is receptive to the City ~~Y~A~ negotiating w~tR him to terminate his Exclusive lease agreement to build a tennis court on the City 's reservoir behind 1504 Cottonwood lane. The Board recommended the City Attorney negot i ate with Mr . Clark to purchase his Exclusive Lease agreement. Mr.Higday moved; Page 3 of 4 • I • • • ( Mr. Resley seconded: Ayes: Nays : Members absent : Motion carried. • • - To instruct the City Attorney to negotiate with Mr. Richard Clark to purchase his exclusive lease agreement which was granted for building a tennis court on the City's reservoir behind 1504 Cottonwood Lane. Vobejda, Best, Resley, Fullerton, Gulley, Higday, Otis None Thompson, Lay 7) CHRIS PAULSEN'S REPLY TO HOUSE BILL #1271. Mr. Fonda discussed Chris Paulsen's reply to the City regardin g House Bill #1271. 8) MISSION VIEJO YIELD STUDY BY BLATCHLEY & ASSOC. The Board received a copy of this study. This will be discussed at the next Water and Sewer Board meeting. 9) ARTICLE FROM DENVER POST METRO SECTION DATED APRIL 21, 1985. The Board received copies of a newspaper article that appeared April 21, 1985 in the Metro section of The Denver Post. Mr. Fonda discussed the article with the Board . 10) UNION AVENUE . Mr. Fonda reviewed steps being taken at the Union Avenue Dam in lieu of the two drownings at that location. The meeting adjourned at 6 :40 p.m. The next Englewood Water and Sewer Board meeting will be held June 18, 1985 in the Library Conference Roo m. Respectufully sub mitted, c»~ ll, ·vu:~ ca thy Bu fra ge Rec ording Sec retary Page 4 of 4 • ) I • • • I. CALL TO ORDER. • • • URBAN RENEI-IAL AUTHORITY June 5, 1985 The r egular meeting of the Englew ood Urban Ren ewal Authority was called to o rder by Chairman Vo th at 5:30 P. M. Members present: Novicky, Totton, VanDyke, Voth, Minnick Powers, Executive Director Members absent: Cole , Neal Mcintyre , Non-voting Alternate Also present: Assistant URA Director Hinson EDDA Executive Director Penney Dietrich Tom Fitzpatrick, Former URA Membe r II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES. May 1, 19 85 May 15, 19 8 5 Chairman Voth stated that the Mi nut es of May 1, 1985 and May 15, 1 9 8 5 we re to be co nside r ed for approval. 9 c To tton moved: Minnick seconded : The Minutes of May 1, 1985 and May 15, 1985 be approved as written. AYES: Tot t on, VanDyke , Voth , Minn ick , Novicky NAYS : No ne ABSENT: Cole , Neal ABSTAIN: None The motion carried. III. RELOCATION CLAIM . Colorado 's Finest Meats Mr. Hinson presented and discussed the relocation claim filed by Colorado 's Finest Meats . This claim includes compensation for advertising, reprinted materials, and licenses. Staff has reviewed the request, and has determined that the license renewal fees are not compe nsable items . Staff recommends payment of $658.49 to Colorado 's Finest Meats; this is the final claim which will be conside red from this business. Minnick moved: Totton seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority approve payment of $658 .49 to Colorado's Finest Meats for the Fin al Relocation Payment . AY ES: VanDyke, Minnick , Novicky , Totton, Voth NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole, Neal ABSTAI : None I • • • • -2- The motion carr ied. IV. RELOCATION CLAIM Nielsen Investment Company Mr. Hinson presented and discussed a relocation claim filed by Mrs. Barbara Holthaus for Nielsen Investment Company. The request includes compensation for installing the telephone system, sign relocation, and reprinting obsole te materials. This is the final claim which wi ll be considered from this business. Staff recommends payment of $474.73 to Nielsen Investment Company. Nov icky moved: Minnick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority approve payment of $474 .73 to Nielsen Investment Company for the final relocation payment. AYES: Voth, Minnick, Novicky, Totton, VanDyke NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole, Neal ABSTAIN: None The motion carried. Mr. Neal entered the meeting and took his place with the Authority members. V. RELOCATIO CLAIM lves tern Union Mr. Hinson stat ed that the lvestern Union facility had been quartered at 3311 South Broadway. Mr. Hinson described the facilities that were used in the Western Union operation, pointing out that this operation could not be "shut down" during the move. Western Union , by the nature of their business, had to create a duplicate facility at the new location, and switch over to the new facility on each account individually. \Vhile there was no actual "cartage" involved in the relocation, Western Union is asking the Authority consider the act of transferring the service to the new location comparable to cartage. The total request was for $31,184.08, which Mr. Hinson analyzed, pointing out items which the staff does not feel ar e compensable, and those items which the s taff does recommend paying. Mr. Hinson pointed out that there is documentation in the file of the attempts made by staff to contact Western Union personnel regarding the relocation of this facility, which documentation begins six to eight months prior to the actual move; however, \,Testern Union personnel did not pursue the relocation of the facility until the building at 3311 South Broadway was in the actual process of demolition, and Western Union is now requesting reimbursement for overtime charges of Mountain Bell personnel . In light of the staff documentation on contacts with Western Union , staff does not recommend compensation for the overtime charges. Mr. Hinson discussed further items claimed by Western Union, $10,321 of which is for the travel and lodging expenses for Western Union personnel. I • • • • • -3- In light of Urban Renewal Autho rity policies, this would not be a com- pensable item. Discussion ensued. Mr. Hinson stated that he was cer- tain that Western Union will appeal the staff recommendation, if this is approved by the Authority, and request more compensation for some of the items he has mentioned. Further discussion ensued . Novicky moved: Minnick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority recommend payment of $3,063 to Western Union for relocation expenses. Mr. Minnick stated that he felt it should be made very clear that the staff did make numerous attempts to contact Western Union personnel re- garding the relocation, and that Western Union personnel did not pursue the relocation efforts vigorously; therefore, the overtime charges from Mountain Bell are, in his opinion, unjustified. The vote was called: AYES: Minnick, Neal , Novicky, Totton, VanDyke, Voth NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion carried. VI. RELOCATI ON CLAIM. Merchant 's Oil Mr. Hinson stated that repeated attempts to contact Mr. Calkins of Merchants Oil were made by Relocation Officer Belnap; telephone calls are documented , and letters were sent to Mr. Calkins pointing out the deadline for filing the relocation claim for relocation of the warehouse and a tenant that he had on the property at 3464 South Bannock Street. The six month deadline for filing the claim was March 31, 1985; the claim was not submitted to the office until April 30, 1985. The Urban Renewal Authority has es- tablished a six-month period of time in which displaced businesses and residents may file for relocation compensation; inasmuch as this time period was exceeded by Merchant's Oil, the staff recommends that the c laim for compensation be disallowed. Tot ton moved: Neal seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority disallow the relocation claim filed by Merchants Oil for relocation of the warehouse at 3464 South Bannock Street because the six-month filing time had expired prior to receipt of the claim. AYES: Minnick, Neal, Novicky, Totton, VanDyke, Voth NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion carried . • I • • - • • • • -4- VII . FINANCIAL REPORT. Ms . Powers reviewed the financial report with the Authority members. Several questions we r e raised on figures cited in the r epo r t. Ms. Powers stated that she wo u ld check into the discrepancies cited. Ms. Powers then discus s ed th e request f r om the audit ors that t he Authority pass a new resolution adop t i n g a budget fo r 1 984, an d t o also pass a resolution a dop t i n g t h e 1 9 85 budg e t f o r the Authority . Ms . Powers dis- cussed action that th e Autho r i t y has alrea dy t ake n i n a do pt i n g the budgets fo r 19 84 a n d 1985 , but poi nted o u t t hat the audito rs ar e asking t hat the Autho r i t y r eaffirm t he ir pr evi ous ac t io n by a do pti n g th e pro po sed resolu- tion s . Totton moved: Minnick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority adop t Resolution 118 , Series of 1985 , A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ENGLEWOOD URBAN RENEWAL AUTH ORITY 'S 1984 BUDGET . AYES: Neal , Novicky, Totton, Va n Dyke, Voth, Minnick NAYS : None ABSENT : Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion car ried . Minnick moved: Novicky seconded: Th e Urba n Re n ewal Au t ho r ity adopt Resolution 119 , Series of 1985, A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ENGLEWOOD URBAN RENE\o/AL AUTHORITY 'S 1985 BUDGET. AYES: Novicky, Totton , VanDyke , Voth , Mi nn ick, Neal NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion carried. Vlll . DOWNTOWN REDEVELOP~ffiNT PLAN . Ms . Powers discussed proposed changes to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan which will facilitate acquisition of property by the Urban Renewal Au- thority. It is also proposed to modify the boundaries of the urban re- newal project area to include an area south of U.S. 285 and to e n compass the former Safeway building on East Hampden Avenue. The boundary will also n eed modification on the north of the new Safeway Store at U.S. 285 and South Logan due to a realignment of the building from the original proposal. Proposed changes in wording for the Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the proposed map changes were reviewed in more depth. Ms. Powers stated that specific properties to be acquired by the Authority will n o longer be listed, but a generalized statement on acquisition by the Authority will be incorporated into the Plan. Further discussion ensued . • I • • • • • • -5- Mr. Novicky suggested that the Attachment for Items #19 and #20 be modified in the last sentence to state that "Nothing stated or ... required to purchase ANY OR all of •.• " Minnick moved: Novicky s econded: The Urban Renewal Authority adopt Resolution #10, Series of 1985, A RESOLUTION OF THE ENGLEWOOD URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY RECOMMENDING TO ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL AN AMENDMENT OF THE ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN RE- DEVELOPMENT PLAN. AYES: Totton, VanDyke, Voth, Minnick, Neal, Novicky NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion carried . IX . COOPERATION AGREEMENT. Ms . Powers discussed the Cooperation Agreement between the City of Englewood , Colorado, and the Englewo od Urban Renewal Authority, which Cooperation Agreement was approved by the City Council on June 3, 1985. Ms. Powers discussed the area around the existing King Soopers Store, noting that none of the parking area is on the tax rol ls, having been deeded back to the City by the developer of Cinderella City . The down- town redeveloper, Mr. Brady, is now in discussion with KRAVCO and King Soopers regarding the acquisition of this property by Brady Corporation, and there is a need for this parking area to be back on the tax rolls. Steps are being taken t o separate the parking area east of So uth Elati Street from the parking ar ea west of South Elati Street in legal descrip- tions. Under the Cooperation Agreement, the City will deed to the Urban Renewal Authority the parking area on the east side of South Elati Street; the Urban Renewal Authority may deed this parking area to the redeveloper. TI1e redeveloper is obligated to develop and use the prop- erty in accordance with the guidelines of the Redevelopment Agr eement; if he fails to do so , the property will r e vert to the Urban Renewal Au- thority, which body will then deed the property back to the City of Englewood. Mr. Novicky pointed out that on Page 2 of the Agreement the statement is made that" .•. protective of the health, safety, morals, and welfare ... " Mr. Novicky suggested that the terminology be clarified ; he understood that there had been a court determination that the word "morals" could no longer be included in such statements. Ms. Powers stated that this would be verified with Legal Counsel Benedetti. Totton moved: Neal seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority approve and authorize Chair- man Voth to sign the Cooperation Agreement between the City of Englewood, Colorado and the Englewood Urban Re- newal Authority. AYES: VanDyke , Voth, Minnick, Neal, Novicky, Totton NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole ABSTAIN: None • I • • • • • - -6- The motion carried. X. FINER WAREHOUSE. Mr. Hinson discussed a communication from Civil Engineer Ragland per- taining t o the new Finer Warehouse. Th e Authority approved Spring Gulch Exc avating demolishing and regrading an existing rubble wall adjacen t to Mr. Finer's property on South Lincoln. In the Contract with Spring Gulch was a provision for Spring Gulch to excavate down to the f oo ting of the concrete retaining wall located in the alley at the west e nd of the Finer prope rty. This was done, and measurements were taken on th e construction of the wall inasmuch as no plans are in existence on the retaining wall . The area was backfilled and co mpacted, but no compaction t e sts we r e made i nas much as it was unknown that the excavation would affect the founda- tion of the new warehouse. Onc e co nstruction of the warehous e was begun , it was found that a portion of the f o undation would be constru cted over the area previously excavated; the l o t is small, and the building could not be resituated on the site. Therefore, the contractor's soils e n gineer recommended over-excavating the fill, and replacing it with concrete, the total cost of whi ch is $605 .00. Ms. Ragland's initial reco mm endation was for payment of $418.50; however, after discussion with the contrac t or staff does recommend payment of the full amount of $605.00 . These funds would be from the Englewoo d Parkway Bid Package No. 1 Co ntinge n cy Budget. Discussion ensued. Min n ick moved: Novicky seco nd ed : The Urban Renewal Autho rity approv e payment to Hr. Murphy of $605 .00 fo r excavation a nd concrete wo r k on the retaining wall . The funds are to be taken from th e Englewood Parkway Bid Package No. 1 Co nt ingency b ud ge t. AYES: Voth, Mi n nick , Neal , Novicky , Totton, VanDyke NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion carried . Mr. Totton asked when Mr. Finer would be moving into the new building. Mr. Hinson stated that the Authority is to close on the purchase of lr. Finer's property before Jun e 30, 1985. XI. CONSTRUCTION REPORT. The construction report from Is. Ragland was in the packets. Mr. Hinson pointed out that the poor weather i n the last few days may delay the finish work by one or tw o days , but they are pretty much on schedule. XII. LAND ACQUISITION. Mr. Hinson discussed negotiations on the acquisition of the Forington property, 3422 South Bannock Street. Mr. Forington had declined to ac- I • • • • • • -7- cept either the initial offer or the counter offer made by the URA, and a valuation hearing had been scheduled for sometime this month. Mr. Forington's legal counsel, John Criswell, had advised Mr. Opperman, legal counsel to the URA, that Mr. Forington is willing to settle for the $65,000 counter offer made by the Authority. An update o f the Au- thority's appraisal came in at $57,000, and Mr. Opperman advised that there would be considerable court costs incurred in pursuing the matter through the courts; he, therefore, recommended that the Auth ority se ttl e the acquisition for $65 ,000. The Authority was notified of this by tele- phone, and agreed to settle for $65,000. Mr. Hinson stated that the Su p er Yarn Ma r t valuation was settled out -of- court, and the papers hav e been signed . Mr . Hinson then discussed the negotiations with Richard N. Graham for the acquisition of his property on South Acoma Street. Through negotia- tions, a mutually acceptable selling price of $111,000 has been reached, which is contin gen t on resolution of the leases Mr . Graham has with three tenants, two of which are billboard companies. One lease is with the Trailways Bus Company, and Mr . Hinson is working with these people to assist in their relocation. This selling price was also discussed with the Authority by telephone and agreed to by the Authority . Novicky moved: Minnick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority reaffirm the payment of $65,000 to Mr. Wm. Forington for his property at 3422 South Bannock Street . AYES: Minnick, Neal, Novicky, Totton, VanDyke, Voth NAYS: None ABSE NT: Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion carried. Nov icky moved: VanDyke seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority reaffirm acceptance of Mr . Richard Graham's counter offer of $111,000 for his property on South Acoma Street. AYES: Minnick, Neal, Novicky, Totton, VanDyke , Voth NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion carried . Mr. Hinson discussed contacts that have been made on the Midland Federal Savings property; Midland Federal Savings owns the improvements on the site, and the land is owned by Ms. Alice Crowe and Richard McKinley. The Authority has received the appraisals ordered on the property, and the property owners have been advised to obtain appraisals, for which the Au- thority will pay. These appraisals should be com pleted within 30 to 45 days • • I • • • • • • -8- XIII. PUBLIC FORUM. Mr. Tom Fitzpatrick , former City Councilman/Urban Renewal Authority member, addressed the Authority on the "rumors" that are circulating about the project. Mr. Fitzpatrick suggested that someone should dis- cuss with King Soopers representatives what is going on so that the King Soopers employees have a clearer understanding of the situation , and advised a more intense public relations effort. Ms. Dietrich of the EDDA stated that she has made a ppl ication for loans to pay for the public improvements on Broadway. Ms. Powers stated that Mr. Kaufman has presented plans for the r enovation of his building ; this renovation is scheduled to begin on July 1 . XIV. LAND ACQUISITION . Minnick moved: Totton seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority go into Executive Session for further discussion on land acquisition. AYES: Minnick, Neal, Novicky , Totton, VanDyke, Voth NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion carried. * * * * * Minnick moved: Novicky seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority come out of Executive Session. AYES: Neal, Novicky, Totton, VanDyke, Voth, Minnick NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion carried . Novicky moved: Minnick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority authorize the staff to make a counter offer to purchase Mr. Ed Dinkel's property at 3434 South Acoma Street in the amount of $110 ,000.00. AYES: Novicky, Totton, VanDyke, Vo th, Minnick, Neal. NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole ABSTAIN: None The motion carried . • I • • - • • • • • -9- Ms. Powers stated that Ms. Belnap has submitted a notice of resignation from her position of Relocation Officer . Mr. McDowell h a s relocated to Santa Fe, New Mexico, and Mr . Hinson is filling in on both the relocation officer and negotiator duties . The meeting adjourned at 7:50 P . M. • I • • • I. CALL TO ORDER. • • • URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY SPECIAL MEETING June 13, 1985 9 r. ., The special meeting of the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority was called to order at 5:50 P. M. By Chairman Voth. M~mbers present: VanDyke, Voth, Minnick, Novicky Mcintyre, Non-voting Alternate Members absent: Totton, Cole, Neal Powers, Executive Director Also present: Assistant Director Hinson Civil Engineer Ragland Rob Carlson, Muller Engineering II. ENGLEWOOD PARKWAY Bid Package 02 Ms. Ragland stated that three bids were received for the construction of Englewood Parkway, and that the bids were opened Monday, June 10. Copies of the bids broken down by line item were handed to members of the Authority. Bituminous Roadways of Colorado was low bidder on the project, having s ubm itted a bid of $1 ,513,608.05 on the project. The Engineer's estimate for the project was $1,559,149.67. Ms. Ragland stated that she has checked the references for Bituminous Roadways of Colorado; they have worked for the cities of Aurora, Greenwood Village, Lakewood, the Colorado Department of Highways, and have previously worked for Englewood . All the references were good, and people to whom Ms. Ragland spoke said they would hire the company to do further work. Ms. Ragland stated that she has also checked with the bonding company for Bituminous Roadways, and this report is also satisfactory. Ms. Ragland stated that the staff recommends awarding the construction contract to Bituminous Roadways of Colorado in the amount of $1,513,60 8.05, plus a 10% contingency of $151,391,95 for a total project budget of $1,665,000.00. Ms. Ragland reviewed the previous bidding of the total project last Fall when one bid was received that exceeded the engineers estimate by $700,000 and the ultimate determination was made to break the project into two phases . Ms. Ragland stated that it appears by pursuing the two-phas e construction project on the Parkway, there will be a savings to the Au- thority. Also, additional work items have been included in the specifica- tions which were not included in the original bidding specifications last Fall. Ms. Ragland estimated a savings of $290,000 . Ms. Ragland stated that the Parkway project will be completed approximately one later than initially proposed, but at a monetary savings to the Authority. Mr. Voth asked whether any problems with the low bidder was mentioned in discussions with other cities for whom they have done work. Ms. Ragland stated that the city representatives she spoke to s tated that while there are problems on any major construction project, Bituminous Roadways was willing to work with them to reach an amic~ble solution, and that the • I • • • • • -2- work they did was good work. Ms . Ragland discussed the supporting back- up the City of Englewood/Urban Renewal Authority will have on this pro- ject, such as a consulting engineer, and CTL Thompson will be doing the testing on the project. Mr . Novicky asked if the 10% cont inge ncy would cover future chang e orders that might come in. Ms. Ragland stated that it would, and discussed on e change order that the staff would like to put through at the beginning of the project; this is for work along the Midland Federal Savings property along South Cherok ee , and along U. S. 285 from approximately Broadway west along the north side of the right-of-way. Mr. Voth asked what all is included in this phase of the public improve- ment construction. Ms . Ragland stated that an acceleration/deceleration lane on U.S. 285 from Broadway west-bound, curb and gutter along U. S. 285 to Bannock, closing of Bannock access after present tenants are gone, l andscaping on both sides of South Cherokee Street except in front of the Midland property is proposed. This phase does not include any construc- tion work on South Acoma Street. Ms. Ragland stated that there is a com- pletion time of 120 days, and it is anticipated that the Parkway will be completed and open to traffic on November 1, 1985. She pointed out that a lot of work has already been completed for the Parkway, but that such things as undergrounding of electrical service cables, etc . need to be completed in this phase before the Parkway is compacted and paved. Mr. Novicky expressed concern about "building in" the 10% contingency in the project budget . Ms. Ragland stated that the 10% contingency is not considered as part of the project construction cost; but it does aid in the smooth flow of the project if a problem arises . Ms. Ragland stated that a contractor may not know that a contingency fund has been budgeted. Mr. Carlson stated that there will be problems on any construction pro- jec t, and agreed with Ms . Ragland that i.t is well to have a contingency fund approved for those times. Mr. Minnick inquired about the linear footage of "temporary work" along U. S . 285 and South Cherokee Street. Mr. Carlson stated that the proposal is to bring the curb and gutter around the corner from Cherokee and run it ac ross South Bannock Street, cl os ing off access at this point to and from South Banno c k. Th is is part of the change order that the staff hopes to get in before the temporary work is done, because it will be cheaper if the temporary work does not have to be done and then removed to put in the permanent curb/gutter, a ccess lane, and landscaping. Discussion e nsued. Minnick moved: VanDyke seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority accept the low bid from Bituminous Roadways of Colorado in the amount of $1,513,608,05, with a 10% contingency budget of $151,391.95 for a total budget amount of $1,665,000.00 and that the construction contract for Englewood Parkway Bid Package #2 be awarded to Bituminous Roadways of Colorado. • I • • - • • • • -3- Discussion followed. The vote o n the motion was called: AYES: VanDyke, Voth, Minnick, Novicky NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole, Neal, Totton ABSTAIN: None The motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 6:15 P. M. * * * * * Prior to the meeting being called to order, Ms. Ragland had displayed pictures of th e trees which have been pre-purchased for the Englewood Parkway; these trees include maple, oak, ash and hawthorne . A pur- chase estimate of $70,000 to $75,000 had been made at the time pre-pur- chase approval was granted by the Authority, but appears that the actual purchase price will more nearly approximate $45 ,000. The trees and landscaping (shrubbery) will not be planted along the Parkway until next Spring. The nurseries have advised that because of the size of the trees purchased, a Fall planting could result ~ a poor survival rate. Sod will be laid this Fall. Median areas will be finished with wood chips this Fall and Winter, and will be planted in the Spring. The tree grates will be placed this Fall, removed and reinstalled next Spring after the trees are planted. The contractors submitting bids on Englewood Parkway Bid Package #2 will have 45 days next Spring in which to do the landscaping work, and this is included in the figures they have submitted in the bid. Ms. Ragland discussed the paving of the common areas --sidewalks, inter-sections, etc. I • • ~In ( • • • .. • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Jun e 18, 1985 5:00 P. M. Members of the Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission convened in Con- ference Room A for a study session at 5:00 P. M. on June 18, 1985. Members present: Magnuson, Allen, Beier, Stoel, Barbre, Carson, Venard, Gourdin Members absent: Also present: Vargas, Acting Direc tor of Community Development McBrayer Susan Powers, Assistant City Manager for Economic Development Dorothy Romans, Assistant Director of Community Development Susan T. King, Senior Planner Mr. Venard stated that the purpose of the study session is to further discuss the goals and objectives of the Commission for 1985/1986. Goal #1 , REPORT ON THE INVESTIGATION OF A CITY-WIDE RESIDENTIAL TRASH COLLECTION BY THE CITY. INVESTIGATE THE FEASIBILITY OF CONVERSION OF TRASH TO USEFUL PRODUCT, was discussed by Mr. Allen. He stated that the ad hoc committee studying this problem has met, and members have discussed the sco pe of concern. The minimum recommendation would be for the City to contract the pick-up and disposal of trash with an in- dependent disposal company, and charge this fee against the water and sewer bills. This would assist in elimina ting the "loose trash" around the City . Mr. Allen stated that the committee has not considered any bottom-line cost figures on the proposal at this point in time. Mr. Allen stated that the ideal would be to have a full-blown trash re- moval , recycling, energy conversion system. He stated that prior to requesting funds from the City, it is his opinion that there needs to be a clearer definition of the problem and the proposed resolutions . No time frame has been cited as yet. Mr. Carson stated that he understood that the Council asked the Com- mission and staff to look into the matter of the trash collection in the City. He urged that a recommendation be forwarded to City Council. Mr. Allen stated that he has spoken with Mayor Otis regarding the issue of trash collection, and has also spoken with the City Manager. Mr. Allen stated that the committee needs to define what is best for Engle- wood, and that any recommendation made to City Council must be based on what is best for the City. Mr. Carson reiterated his suggestion that a recommendation be sent to City Council asking that the trash pick-up be contracted out, and that haulers be asked to submit bids on the cost of the residential trash pick-up service. Mr. Allen reiterated his opinion that the committee needs more information prior to any recommendation being made. Mr. Vargas suggested a need to determine the scope of any survey that is to be done, such as an analysis of the problem, and suggested reso- lutions to the problem . • I • • • • • • -2- Mr. Stoel asked if an o rdinance could be enacted requiring that every residential unit must have trash pick-up. Mr. Carson stated that he wo uld rather see the Ci t y ask for bids to have the trask pick-up do n e. Mr . Allen again stated that he felt action beyond defining the scope of the problem and the economic needs is premature. He stated that there is a n eed to also look at the long-range needs --pick-up, in- c ineration, conversion. He pointed out that a complete incineration program probably would not cos t as much as a new City Hall, and that we have wait e d too long t o "ease" into the program. The committ ee is to do further refinement on the scope of the pro blem, a nd furth e r define propo sed resolutions, and report back to the Com- miss ion a s a whol e . Goal II, REVIEW SWEDISH HOSPITAL MASTER PLANS AND POTEN TIAL IMPACT ON THE NEIGHBO RHOOD, was considered. Mrs. Romans stated that the Commis- sion has traditionally met with the Swedish Ho spital Board in the Fal l. Goal III , DEVELOP A PROMOTION PLAN FOR ENGLEWOOD UTILIZING THE NEW BROCHURE, was next discussed. Mr. Stoel asked if EDDA was not to wo rk with the City in developing a brochure and a promotion plan fo r the City. Ms. Powe rs stated that EDDA has developed the e nglewo od , which is an i n formational brochure. Mr . Stoel asked if there were some way the Commission could be kept informed on the activi ties of the EDDA . Ms. Po wers stated that EDDA is doing a marketing study for the area e a s t o f Broadway . Discussion ensued. Mr. Venard sugg ested that copies o f the Co mmissio n minutes be sent to EDDA , and ask the Direc tor of EDDA if co pies of their minutes could be availab l t o the Planning Commi s sion . Go a l IV, REVIEW REPORT BEING GENERATED REGARDING CIT Y TRAFFIC PATTERNS. REVI EW TH E MASTER STREET PLAN FOR NECESSARY CHAN GES , was discussed . Mrs. Rom ans r e ported that th e Traffic Engineering Division has nearly com- pleted the traffic counts; when this information is avail able, it will b e used in the revision of the Mas ter Street Plan, a nd designation of col lector and a r te rial str eets will be bas e d o n thi s info rmation . Coal V, ESTABL I SH SOLAR AC CESS ORDINANCE, was then considered . Mrs. Romans stated that Mr s . Ro thwe i l e r, Planner I , h a s b een do ing research on this topic , and on the sat e llite dish issue, and the staff hopes t o have s o meth ing to present to the Commission in the near future. Goal VI , INITIATE STUDY TO DETERMINE THE FEASIBILITY AND SOURCE OF FUNDS FOR OXFO RD PARKWAY FROM BROADWAY TO SANTA FE (M EDIAN), was dis- cussed . Mr . Ve nard stated that an ad hoc committee com pos e d o f Mr. McB r ayer , Mr. Ma gnuson, and himself were looking into this issue. Mr. Va rg as sugg est e d that this project might also be considered in conjun c - tion with the Capital Im provements Program. Mrs. Romans stated that the Co mmissio n will have the C.I.P. on the agenda for the meeting of J uly 2 . I • • • • • • -3- Goal VII, IDENTIFY AREAS TO ANNEX THAT WOULD BE OF BENEFIT TO THE CITY . ENCOURAGE ANNEXATION OF THE IDENTIFIED AREAS, was considered . Mr. Carson asked what prog ress had been made on th e discussions with Home Lumber. Mrs . Romans stated that she has not had further discussions wi th this business owner, but she will attempt to contact him. Mr. Carson then inquired about the areas in the proximity of West Tufts Avenue. Mrs. Romans pointed out t hat the City has annexed some of these same prop- erties previously, but the annexations we r e voided. These property owners a r e opposed to annexation, and pref er th e ir status in Arapahoe County. Discussion ensued . Mr. Vargas stated that it might be ap- propriate for the Commission to recommend to Ci ty Council that steps be taken to pursue th e annexation of these enclave areas in the vicinity of West Tufts Avenue. Carson moved: Steel seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that action be taken to annex th e e nclave pro perties in the vicinit y of West Tufts Avenue, and t o annex Home Lumber Company . Further discussion ensued . The vote was called : AYES: Magnuson, Stoel, Ven a rd, Allen, Barbre , Beier, Carson, Gourdin NAY S : None ABSENT: McB rayer ABSTAIN: None The motion carried. Goal VIII, HOLD JOINT MEETINGS WITH COMMISSIONERS OF ADJAC ENT CITIES. DEVELOP ~~ IMPLEMENT EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS FOR OUR COMMISS IONERS , was considered . Mr. Venard tated that it is the intent of the Commission to pursue setting up meetings with the various jurisdictions. Ms. Powers suggested that the Commission might consider adding the Arapahoe Cou n ty Planning Commission to this group . Coal IX/ COMPLETE REVIEW OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS, will be pursued after the completion of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance revision. Goal X, REQUEST MEETING WITH CITY COUNCIL. FINALIZE AGENDA SUGGESTIONS FOR SUCH MEETING, was discussed. Mr. Stoel suggested that the Commission should begin compiling a list of agenda items they would like to discuss with the City Council. Mr. Vargas was also asked to write a letter asking for a meeting with the City Council sometime in September. Goal XI, STUDY ZONE CHANGES AND CONSIDER REVISIONS OF THE ZONING MAP, was considered. Mrs. Romans stated that she would plan a tour of these areas at the pleasure of the Commission. The Commission suggested the date of July 27, 1985, to begin the tour at 7:30 A. M . • I • • - • • • • -4- Goal XII, REVIEW HANDBOOK, is in progress. Goal XIII, SATELLITE DISH ORDINANCE, was discussed. Mrs. Romans stated that Mrs. Rothweiler, Planner I, is researching this matter in conjunc- tion with her research of the Solar Access Ordinance. Mrs. Romans stated that proposed regulations will be drafted in the format of the Zoning Ordinance, and that satellite dishes will be listed as Accessory Uses; some controls on setbacks of such Accessory Uses will be exercised in this manner. Mrs. Rothweiler has also arranged to have a speaker on the satellite dishes address the Commission at the meeting of July 16. Goal XIV, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW, was considered. Mr. Allen felt this item should be eliminated from the list. Mr. Venard stated that he was of the opinion that the objective in including this on the list was to gain more information. Mrs. Romans stated that the staff would get a draft of proposed regulations to the Commission. Mr. Venard asked Mrs. Romans to also submit to the Commission a list of the areas in town where the zoning designation is of concern to the staff. Mr. Carson suggested that enlargement of the Golf Course cl ub house should be included on this list. Mr. Venard suggested that this item would be more appropriately included on the Capital Improvement Program. Mr. Venard asked if the staff had gotten a report on the sidewalks around Burt Chevrolet, and at Belleview and Broadway. Mrs. Romans stated that th staff had a meeting with State Highway representatives, and it seems to be the policy of the State to assume responsibility for the area between the "curbs"; anything back of the curb line is the City responsibility. Mrs. Romans stated that she has written to the City Attorney to try to find out what the City's responsibility is, but has not received a reply as of this time. Mr. Venard stated that if there were no further comments, the meeting would recess and reconvene at 7:00 P. M. in the City Council Chambers for the regular Commission meeting. * * * * * • I - • • • • -5- CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION June 18, 1985 I . CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of t he• CIty I' I ann lng and Zoning Commission was called to order by Cha I nnan V!•oturd at 7 :00 P. M. Members present: Stoc l, Venard , All en, llarhrc , Be ier, Carson, Gou rdin, Magnuson Members absent: Also present: Vargas, Act lng 01 r ector of Community Development Mcllrayer Susan Powers, Executive Director of the Urban Renewal Authority D. A. Romans, Assistant Director of Community Development Susan King, Senior Planner Jack Olsen , City Attorney II. APPROVAL OF MI NUTES. J une 4, 1985 Chairman Venard stated that the Minutes of June 4, 1985 were to be considered for approval. Carson moved: Stoel seconded: The Minutes of June 4, 1985 be approved as written. AYES: Stoel, Venard, Barbre, Beier, Carson , Gourdin, Magnuson NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Allen ABSENT: McBrayer The motion carried. I II. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Amendment 11 8 CASE 11 14-85 Hs. Powers, Exec utive Director of the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority, addressed the Commission , and stated that the purpose of the presenta- tion is to ask the Commission to review proposed Amendment 1/8 for the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. This proposed amendment must be considered by the Commission, and found to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan of the City. City Council has scheduled a Public Hearing on this proposed amendment for July 1, 1985. Previous amendments to the Plan have been to add properties to the list for acquisition by the Authority, and changes in the text. Amendment #8 is concerned with a change in the boundaries of the Urban Renewal Project Area, and with changes to the text of the Plan • • I • • • - -6- Ms. Powers discussed the modifications to the boundaries of the Urban Renewal Project Area, one of which is the addition of the present Park Floral property south of U. S. 285, and several adjacent properties. There are serious storm drainage problems in this area, and the present system cannot adequately serve the industrial area on Kalamath and Kenyon. Ms. Powers stated that Urban Renewal statutes require solicita- tion of dev elo pers for a ny area to be developed, which will be done . The sales tax and property tax generated by the new development on the site will help to pay for the storm sewer improvements; the redevelop- ment cannot occur until the storm sewer problems are alleviated, and the storm sewer problems canno t be alleviated until a firm commitme nt is made for the redevelopment of the property. Includi ng this area in the Urban Renewal Project Area is the first step to enable negotiations with property ow ners and developers to occur. Ms. Powers also discussed access problems to the site, and which properties will be required to pro- vide the access from U. S. 285. Mr. Stoel asked if this area was zoned for industrial development. Ms. Powers answered in the affirmative . Ms. Powers indicated the second area where the boundary will be changed; this is around the former Safeway Store, and straightening the boundary to include the total new Safeway Store. ~m. Powers stated that the Planning staff has reviewed the amendments to the Plan, and have concluded that the proposed boundary modifications and text changes are compatible with the Comprehensive Plan. Approval of proposed Amendment #8 is recommended, and a proposed resolution is part of the staff report which has been submitted to the Commission. This resolution, if approved by the Commission, will be referred to the City Council for their Public Hearing on July 1. Mr. Venard asked if there were further questions from the Planning Com-mission. Carson moved: Stoel seconded: The Planning Commission approve Resolution #2, Series of 1985, A RESOLUTION OF THE ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGARDING CONSISTENCY OF THE AMENDED OOWNTOWN REDEVEI.DPMENT PLAN WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, and refer said Resolution and Amendment #8 to the Downtown Redevelopment Plan to the City Council. AYES: Venard, Allen, Barbre, Beier, Carson, Gourdin, Magnuson, Stoel NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: McBrayer The motion carried. • I • • - • IV. CONDITIONAL USE 3986-1/2 South Broadway -7- • • • CASE 1111-85 Mr. Venard stated that this case is a request for approval of a Condi- tional Use, an automotive repair shop, in the B-2 Zone District. Barbre moved: Carson seconded : The Public Hearing on Case 1111-85 be opened. AYES: Allen, Barbre, Beier, Carson, Gourdin, Magnuson, Stoel, Venard NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: McBrayer The mot ion carried. Mr. Venard stated that he has been handed a list of members in the audience, who he will call on the address the Commission. He asked that those speak- ing to the Commission come to the podium, state their name and address, and be sworn in. Mr. Vena rd stated that he does have a copy of the notice of public hearing, which was published in the Englewood Sentinel on May 29, 1985. Mr. Venard asked if the staff wished to make further statements at this time. Mrs. Romans stated that the staff had nothing to add to what is contained in the staff report. Mr. Venard then called on Hr . Heitler; Mr. Heitler stated that he had no comment . Hr. Vena rd called on Mr. Sorenson; Mr . Sorenson had no comment. Mr. Venard called on Mr. Henke. Mr . Philip Henke, 3986 South Broadway, was sworn in . He testified that he appeared before the Planning Commission previously on January 22, 1985, at which time they were also requesting approval of the automotive repair shop as a Conditional Use in the B-2 Zone District. At that time, there were several conditions the Commission wanted to place on the approval of the r equest , one of which he and Mr. Jha took exception to. This con- dition was the imposition of a fence across the rear of the property; if this fence were to have been constructed, it would have eliminted the use of the rear of the building and the two parking spaces which are located there. They appealed this issue to the Board of Adjustment, which Board granted a varance and said that it would not be reasonable to require the parking for Hr. Jha's business to be screened. Mr. Henke and Mr. Jha are now asking that the Commission approve the Con ditional Use at this loca- tion. Mr. Henke stated that h e has had an architect make a survey of the building, and a list of items has been submitted that are needed to bring the building up to Code. Mr. Henke presented a letter from Robert W. Naudack, owner of properties at 3997 South Lincoln Street, 3983 South Lincoln Street, and 3971 South Lincoln Street, which indicates that Mr. Naudack has no objection to the operation of an automotive repair shop at 3986-1/2 South Broadway. Mr. Henke stated that the staff report ad- dresses the issue o f parking on-street by the employees and customers of these businesses. Mr. Henke stated that the on-site parking is limited to two spaces in the rear of the building, which hi has assigned to Mr . I • • • • - -8- Jha . Hr . Henk e stated his employees, and Mr . Jha a nd his empl oyee, pa rk on Nassau Aven u e . Mr. He nke stated tha t he has leased and o perated h is business at this location f o r six yea rs, and he has n ever provided off- street parking for his empl oyees in that period of tim e . Mr . Nau da ck has stated that he has no problem with th e parking alo n g Nassau Avenue by the employees of these two businesses. No vehicles a r e l eft on -street ove r night. Mr . He nk e stated tha t he did not feel this small business operated by ~lr .• Th a is co mp o unding th e park ing problem on Broadway or on Nassau . Mr. Henke stat ed that th e r e i s space in Mr. Jha 's portion of the buildin g to park tw o ve hicl e s, plus the two spaces at the r ear o f his building whi ch h e h a s been assigned . This will be used for c ustomer parking and for vehicles that are bein g worke d o n. Mr. Carson asked the numb e r of emp loyees for each o f th ese businesses. Mr . He nke stated that he has three e mpl oyees in a dditio n t o himself; Mr. Jha has one employee a nd himsel f for a total o f fiv e emp loyees for the two business es. Mr. Ca r son noted that this is five peopl e that are bein g asked to park on r esidential streets; h e asked Mr. Henk e if he felt this was right . Mr . Henke stated that h e hasn't had any parking for his employees for a long time; h e did have an ag r eeme nt with Mr . Markham; this property is now being used as a ca r sales lot, so he l o st that area for parking. Mr. Stoel n oted that Mr. Henke stated that an architect has surveyed the building and submitted a list o f changes, which the City has accepted wi th the addition of on e ex it door. Mr. Stoel asked if the applicant plans to do the remodeling t o the b uildin g . Mr . Henke stat ed that he will do it if it is n ecessary, and it will be do n e at his expense . Mr. Stoel asked if a co ndition for approval were that t he remodeling would be done as outlined by the architect a nd with the addit i o nal exit doo r, would the applicant be willing to do them . Mr . Henke replied in the aff irmative . Mr. Allen asked if people parked in the alley . Mr. Henke stated tha t people do not pa r k in the alley, but in the back of th e ga r age. The vehicles to be repaired are parked on the north side of the garage building . The r e ls not sufficient r oom to park in the alley . Mr . Henke pointed out that Little Wheels has the parking rights to a part of the area at the rear of his building, and a l so uses street parking for a number of their lot vehicles they are preparing for sale . Mr. Donald Rippen, 304 Wellington, Nort h glenn , was sworn in. Mr. Rippen testified that he is the owner of the property in question, and wanted to reassure the Planning Commissio n that he has been in control of the property since 1970. There had been no change in the parking n eeds of the leasees of the property since that time. Mr. Rippen stated that if the Commission denies the use of the garage "you will deny another small businessman in Englewood ." Spaces for small business garage areas are very difficult to find; he s tated that he get s no more money from the lease of this building to Mr . Jha, who sub-leases f r om Mr. Henke, so that is not a factor in his urging approval of the request. Mr. Allen asked if Mr . Rip pen opera t ed a business o n the property. Mr . Rippen stated that h e did not; he owns the property, leasing the buildings to other businessmen. He stated that he did have a business on the site from 1970 to 1979 . • I • ( ( • • • • -9- Mr. Allen asked if Mr. Rippen had occasion to view the property and ob- serve the parking co ng estion. Mr. Rippen stated that he does view the property from time to time. Mr. Venard asked if Mr . Rippen was aware of the off-street parking re- quirements for this type of business. Mr. Rippen stated that he possibly was not aware. Mr . Venard asked if Mrs. Romans could give the minimum requirements for off-street parking on these businesses. Mrs. Romans stated that this is a "mixed-use" and should be figu r ed as separate uses. Computing the parking needs at one space per each two employees, plus two spaces for each 300 square feet of repair or maintenance area would be the formula to be used. She stated that the applicant has not sub- mitted a floor plan giving the square footage, so it would be difficult to determine at this time what the minimum parking should be. Mr. Rippen estimated that the square footage of the building is 2, BOO sq. ft . Mrs. Romans estimated a minimum of 9 off-street parking spaces would be required based on the square footage alone. Mr. Venard pointed out that Mr. Rippen has stated that if the Commission were to deny approval of this request, they would be denying another small business in Englewood; Mr. Venard asked Mr. Rippen what he felt his responsibility to be to provide parking for those businesses using his property. Mr. Rippen stated that if he owns the property, he would have to provide the parking to make it a viable business. Mr. Venard stated that it did not appear that Mr. Rippen could provide the needed parking for these businesses on this property. Mr. Rippen stated that the "spaces are there but th e way it's divided up they aren't provided for these uses." Mr. Ve nard suggested that merchants should be r esponsible e nough to provide parking on their property for the use of that property, and not to rely on the over-loading of streets to provide the parking for the business. Mr. Allen asked if Mr. Rippen had a plan for the subject site showing where the parking is located. Mr. Rippen stated that he did not. Mr. Allen asked if Mr. Rippen planned to develop a plan showing the City where the parking would be provided. Mr. Rippen stated that his "future use [of the property] is unknown at this time." Mr. Carson asked how many parking spaces were provided on the lot on the corner at Broadway and Nassau. Mr. Rippen stated that h e is not prepared to answer this question. Mr. Carson stated that a lot of the vehicles from the corner business are parking on the street. Mr. Rippen stated "Is that a fact, sir?" Mr. Carson stated "It's a fact." Mr. Venard asked if there were additional questions of Mr. Rippen. He then asked that Mr. Jha come to the podium. Shiv Jee Jha, 3986 South Broadway, was sworn in. Mr. Jha stated that he is sub-leasing space from Englewood Motor Supply, and does minor repair. There have been no concerns and no problems e xpressed to him since the previous hearing; there is onfy one e mployee besides himself in his por- tion of the business. Mr. Jha stated that there are spaces for two ve- hicles in the building, and two at the rear of the building; none of the vehicles remain over-night. Mr. Steel stated that the staff report indicates that Mr. Jha has been in business since November, 1984. Mr. Jha stated that this is correct • • I • • • • • • -10- He ap plied for a sales tax license at that time , and was told th at this use would have to be app r oved by the Commissio n before the Sales Tax License could be issued . Mr. Jha stated that he was told by th e City that he could operat e the business, but had to get the business approved by the Commission before he could get a sales tax license. Mr . Venard stated that th e staff report also indicates that Mr . Jha does not have an Occupancy Permit for his portion of the building. Mr. J ha stated th at his application is in; this is the third public hearing he has been through o n this matter. Mr. Jha reiterated that he was told by "people" i n Ci ty Hall that he could continue o perating his business until the Planning Co mmission makes a decision . Mr. Allen stat ed that the Ci t y has receive d complaints reg arding the parking co ngestion in t he area . Mr . Jha stated that there a re n ow three busin e sses operating there; the car sales lot is parking cars o n the street, pl us Little Wheels, a nd his business . Mr. Allen stated that he understo o d that Mr. Jha was alleging he has had n o co nta c t from City Hall on the parking issue, or the lack o f sales tax license, o r occupan cy permit; is this corr ect. Mr. Jha again st a ted that the City has told him that he co uld continue to operate his business; that a sales tax license could n ot be issued until the business was approved for this location . Mr . Vargas stat ed that it was h is understanding that Mr. Jha had applied for his sales tax license after he had been in operation f o r a while; he was told that he wo uld have to get approval from the Planning Co mmission for this typ e of business to operate at this location, and was informed tha t he wo uld n o t be "shut down" until h e got a det e rmination from the Plannin g Commission on his applicat ion f o r app r oval of the business. ~lr. Jh a has been pursuin g this sin c e January , 1985 . Mr. Venard asked if there were any qu estions from the Co mmis sio n. Mr. Ve n a rd then asked if there was anyone else in the audience who wished t o spe ak on this matter. No one else indicated they wanted to address th e Co mmission o n this issue. Mr. St oel stat e d that this is a very difficult situation. Mr . Stoel st a t ed that Mr. Jha is trying to do business. Concern was expressed by some of t hen ighb o rs at th e previous h e aring; however, Mr. Jha and Mr . Henke h av e now ob taine d a letter from Mr . Naudack who says h e has no pro blem with the oper a tion o f this business at this location, so at least one adjacent n e i ghbor has changed his mind about the probl e ms thi s use may cause . Mr . Stoe l also pointed out that the building is an e xisting structure ; p arking s pace s c annot be provided for th e us e s on the site b cause t h e space isn 't available for the parking. Mr . Stoel stated tha t he does want t o mak e s ure that the building is safe, a n d the applicants have had an archite ct view th e building and have submitted his recommenda- tion s , t o wh ich t he City has also added a r equirement. Mr. Stoel stated that h e want ed to see Mr. Jha obtain the proper licenses and permits to o p e r a t e th bu s iness, and would like to s e Mr. Jha continue to operate h is busine ss at this location. Mr. Stoel stated that he does see the p r ob lems that ar e b e ing c r e ated by the auto sales lot on the corner, but on t he s u bject prop e rty he do es not s ee a pro bl e m other than the saf e ty o f th e building. • I • • • • .. -11- Mr. Allen stated that h e did not see how there could be sufficient parking to accommodate thes e uses. Mr. Stoel stated that the space for the parking is not ther e , and this situation will not change, no matter what type of use might be on the site. This entire structure would have to be raz e d and a new structure erected with the required parking figured into th e new d evelo pm e nt. Mr. Ve nard sta t ed that he could appreciate what Mr. Stoel is saying; it is an un fortunat e situation, and Mr. Jha is caught in the middle. Wh a t- ever the Commiss ion does, the parking area is not available, and the em- ployees will be using parking on the public streets. Mr. Venard stated that we do have problems in this area and the business density on this site does compound the parking problems. Mr. Venard stated that he did not feel that h e could support the application. Ca r son mo ved: Stoel seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #11-85 be closed . AYES: Barbre, Beier, Carson, Gourdin, Magnuson, Stoel, Venard, Allen NAYS: None ABSENT: McBrayer ABSTAIN: No n e The motion carried . Mr. Venard asked f o r furth e r discussion on this matt e r. Mr. Carson stated tha t he had to agree with Mr. Venard; there is insuf- ficient parking, and the business density on this corner is too crowded. All the parki n g for employees from these businesses is on-stree t. Mr. Stoel pointed out that a business other than automotive-related could lease this s i te, wh ich might require more parking, but the Commission could have no voice in the matter because it might no t b e a Conditional Use in the B-2 Zo ne Dis trict. Mr. Stoel em phasized that this is an existing building, th e r e is ins uf ficie nt p a rking space, an d it will not be solved no matter what t y pe of business is o n this site. Mr. Stoel acknowledged that the used car lot is the problem, but it is not the point of concern at this time; he asked wh y Mr. Jha should be put out of business because of the lack of parking which he cannot change . Mr. Allen stated that there are some types of business that might be able to us e the premises that woul d have fewer employees, and would not require the number of parking spaces that are presently required. He stated that bringing vehicles for repair does add to the parking con- gestion . Mr . Gourdin stated that Mr . Naudack may have given approval o r said he has no problems with this particular business , but pointed out that there are three residential properties adjacent to the rear of the site which are owned by Mr . Naudack . Mr . Courdin stated that he felt one of the Commiss i on 's responsibilities is to the residents living adjacent to business areas, and cited factors such as noise, additional t raffic , air pollution, which must all be taken into co ns ideration. Mr. Magnuson stated that he felt there were good points in e v erything that has been said; however, there is a business there, and the matter • I • • • • • ,. - -12- of lack of parking and parking on-street goes back to the matter of en- forcement. If a car is only parked on-street for 24 hours, it is legal. Mr. Naudack 's rent e rs did not appear at the first meeting in January to protest the us e of the property as an auto repair shop, and Mr. Naudack himself has apparently changed his mind about the problems experienced with the use. Mr. Magnuson stated that he would have to support the ap- plication, but emphasized that Mr. Jha would have to meet all the co n- ditions of bringing the building up to Code, obtainin g the proper licenses and permits, e tc. Carson moved: Allen seconded: The Planning Commission deny approval for a Conditional Use at 3986 South Broadway as requested by Mr. Shiv Jee Jha for use as an auto repair shop. This denial is sub- stantiated by the staff recommendation in Case #11-85, staff recommendation being that the subleasing to Caesar's Auto Service compounds on-street parking by customers and employees; there is heavy use of the alley by vehicles, with vehicles parked in the back of the property in various states of repair; and that this location cannot accommodate the increased intensity of business resulting from Caesar 's Auto Service. AYES: Beier, Carson, Gourdin , Venard, Allen, Barbre NAYS : Magnuson, Stoel ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: ~lcBrayer The motion carried. V. SUBDIVISION WAIVER Centennial Shopping Center Mr. Venard asked if the applicant was present. CASE #12-85 Mr. Bruce Heitler stated that he is a general partner of Centennial Limited Partnership, which owns the Centennial Acres Shopping Center. Mr. Heitler stated that there have been problems with access, and with a water and sewer line running across the lot with no easement of record for this line. They have made plans to expand the shopping center, and this is when the water and sewer lines were located; in their present location, they would have to run under a building, which is not approved by the City. To re- solve these problems, Mr. Heitler stated that he and Mr. Sorenson, who o wns th property at 5000 South Federal Boulevard, have agreed to a trade of property, and Mr . Heitler will construct a new building for Mr. Sorenson. The Centennial Acre s Shopping Center is not part of an approved subdivision, and to effectuate the property exchange and the expansion of the shopping center, they have to request a waive r to the Subdivision Regulations. Mr. So renson stated that he does agree with Mr. Heitler 's presentation, and pointed out that while two addresses, 5000 and 5050 South Federal Boulevard are listed in the staff report, the correct address is 5000 South Fed ral Boulevard. Mr. Venard asked if there were any questions or comments from the Com-mission. • I • • • • • • -13- Mr. Stoel commended the two applicants on working out a satisfactory solution to the problem. Stoel moved: Carson seconded : The Planning Commission approve granting a Subdivision Waiver to Mr. Bruce F. Heitler and Leonard C. Sorenson as r equested in Case #12 -85 for the Centennial Acres Shopping Center . AYES: Carson, Gourdin, Magnsuon, Stoel, Venard, Allen, Barbre, Beier NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: McBrayer The motion carried. VI. COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE §16.4-17 CASE 1115 -85 Mr. Venard stated that at the last meeting, the Commission discussed the matter of fences in relation to the B-2 Business District. It was the consensus of t he Commission that it might be more appropriate to modify some provisions in the Fence Ordinance than to further modify the business district regulations. Mr. Carson asked if fences were required in the B-1 Zo ne District. Mrs. Romans stated that fences are not "required"; they a r e "permitted". Mr . Carson stated that he would not object to fences along the alley line in the business districts; he does not want to see fences along the street frontage on South Broadway . Hr. Carson stated that he has driven through several municipalities and viewed their car lots, and "there is no city that has car lots with fencing except the City of Englewood." Mr. Stoel asked if the Commission wanted t o address the issue of fencing differently in the B-1 and B-2 districts. Mr. Carson stated that he did not feel that there were that many areas in downtown with alleys where fencing might be installed; he stated that he did not object to decorative planters along the front of properties. Mrs. Romans pointed out some areas that are zoned B-1 where fencing is installed, and cited St. Louis School, the Malley Center, Simon Center Parking Lot, for instance; these are legitimate use of fencing. Hr. Allen stated that his primary objection is to the "type" of fencing that might be installed. Discussion ensued. ~Irs . Romans noted that on the Malley Center corner l o t, the fencing is set back to the front building line. Hr. Gourdin cited a provision from the City of Aurora whereby a triangle 30 ft. back from the point of intersection is restricted from fencing. Mr. Stoel asked how fencing could be eliminated only from the front of a property. Mr. Allen suggested that it be eliminated on the "street side" of a property. • I • • • • -14- Mr. Magnuson stated that h e felt the decorative masonry walls, Class I, should be left as an option , p r ovided the height could be restrict e d. Mrs. Romans s uggested that fences be excluded in the front of the pro perty, and o n corner lots, the "triangle" could be used, or the prohibition could a p ply t o any fence on the "street side". Mr. Ca rson suggested that Class I type fences, (decorative masonry walls), up to a maximum height of 30 inches, could be allowed on street frontages. It was also suggest e d that there should be an exclusion of public buildings or educatio nal insitutions from these provisions; they c ould install fencing on street side s. Mr. Stoel asked why public buildings should be excluded; he was opposed t o this provision. He would approve fencing a r ou nd educatio nal institutions because it is a safety factor for the children. Wording of th e proposed amendment was discussed. ~Irs. Romans suggested tha t a new section d.l. b e added, readin g : Fences of Class 2, 3, 4, or 5 shall not b e permitted on the street side of any property. Fences of Class 1 on the street side shall not exceed 30 inches in height. This provision shall not apply to educational institutions. Fences in the rear yard or interior side yard may be of Class 1, 2, 3, 4, or S, and shall not exceed 6 feet in height." This wording was acceptable to the Commission. Mr. Venard asked about section e .G. Mr. Allen stated that he did not want to permit a barbed wire fence at all. Mr. Stoel stated that he did not feel this issue needed to be addressed; barbed wire would be restricted to industrial areas, and at a height not less than six feet. Carson moved: Stoel seconded: AYES: Mag nuso n, NAYS : None ABSTAIN: No n e ABSENT: McBrayer The Planning Commission schedule a Public Hearing on July 16, 1985 at 7:00 P. M. to consider amendment o f §16.4-17 d.l. Stoel, Venard, Allen, Barbre, Beier, Carson, Gou rd in The motion carried. VI. FINDINGS OF FACT B-2 Zo n e District CASE 1110-85 Mr. Stoel noted on Page 1 of th e Findings of Fa c t, it indicates that Mr. Thompso n "testified"; inasmuch as the date Mr . Thompson addressed the Commission was not th e date of the Public Hearing, Mr. St oel sug- gested it should read that Mr . Thomps on "stated". It was also suggested that the phrase "on e car lo t owne r" should b e stricken. Magnuson moved: Stoel seconded: The Findings of Fact for Case 111 -85 be approved as corrected . AYES: Stoel, Venard, Allen , Barb r e, Beier, Carson, Gou rdin, Magnuson • • I • • ( • NAYS: None ABSTAIN: one McBrayer ABSENT: The motion carried. VII. PUBLIC FORUM . • • .. • -15- There was no one present to address the Commission. VIII. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE . Nothing was brought before the Commission under Director's Choice. IX. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE. Mr. Beier noted that view of some stop signs is obstructed by vehicles parking in front of them; he asked how close parking is permitted to corners and stop signs. Mr . Vargas stated that he understood parking is restricted 25 feet from any corner. Mr. Stoel stated that according to the Engineering office, it is restricted for 30 feet. Mr. Vargas stated he would clarify this and report back to the Commission. Mr . Carson also noted that some traffic regulatory signs are visually obstructed by tree branches. Mr. Magnuson stated that one of the sessions he attended at the APA Con- ference in Montreal pertained to a vote by acclamation rather than having a voice vote on every motion. He asked why this could not be done on matters such as opening public hearings . Mr. Vargas stated that this is a procedural matter which may be addressed in the Commissioner 's Handbook. Mr . Stoel stated that on matters where there is possible litigation, he felt it would be better to have the individual voice vote . Further discussion ensued on the Conditional Use case heard earlier. Mr. Magnuson pointed out that some use might go in on this site that could have many more vehicles than Mr. Jha 's business, but the Commis- sion might not get to address the issue if it is not a Conditional U e. Mrs. Romans stated that a large part of the problem is that parking for this building has b een allotted to the businessman operating on the cor- ner of Broadway and Nassau. The meeting adjourned at 8:55 P. M. tertrude G. Welty Recording Secretary 7 I • - ( ( • • • • C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM 'I(!., SUBJECT Southgate Supplement #106 DATE May 15, 1985 INITIATED BY Englewood Water and Sewer Board ACTION PROPOSED _____ A~p~pr_o_v_a_l_o_f __ So_u_t_h~ga_t_e __ sa_n_i_t_at_,_·o_n __ o,_·s_t_r_ic_t ____________ ___ Supplement #106 BACKGROUND A request was made by the Southgate Sanitation District representing the owner/developer for annexation to the Southgate Sanitation District area. Inclusion of this land does not increase the tap allocation to the Southgate Sanitation District. a. The sub j ect land parcel is approximately 10.4 acres. The property is zoned R-2.5 and will be used for four custom residential building sites at the existing zoning . b. Legal : See "E xhibit A" attached to Supplement #106. c. Owners: Sa nford Homes, Inc. FINANCIAL DETAILS None. RECOMMENDATION At the May 21, 19 85 meeting the Water and Sewer Board recommended that the City Council approve the annexation of the property described in Supplement #106 to the Southgate Sanitation Distri ct. I • - ( • ORDINAN:E NO. SERIES OF 198_5_ • • • BY AtJJ'HORITY A BILL FOR <lXJN:IL BILL t«>. 51 Ilf1'RODI.X::~ BY CCUCIL PmmER '-/v 1 c AN ORDINAN:E APPROVING SUPPLEMENT t«>. 106 ro SOtrrHGII.TE SANITATION DISTRICT'S AGREEMmr WITH THE CITY OF DG.BroOD ro IICLUDE ADDITIONAL LAND WITHIN THEIR DISTRICT BOUNDARIES, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 10.4 IICRES, IN AN R-2.5 ZONE DISTRICT. WHEREAS, Southgate Sanitation District desires to include an additional area of approxtmately 10.4 acres within their District boundaries; and WHEREAS, subject property is zoned R-2.5 and will be used for four custom residential building sites; and WHEREAS, inclusion of this additional land does not increase the tap allocation to the Southgate Sanitation District; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for said District to amend its agreement with the City to include this additional land; N:M, THEREFORE, BE IT ORD.\INED BY THE CITY COUlCIL OF THE CITY OF~~. COLORADO: Section 1. 'lbat City Council hereby approves the agreanent entitled "&Jpplement No. 106 to Connector's Agreement" between the City of f)lglewood and Southgate Sanitation District, a copy of which agreement is incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. 'lbat City Council hereby authorizes the Hayer and ex off1c1o C1ty Clerk-Treasurer to sign and attest said agreement for and on behalf of the City Council and the City of Ehglewood. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 17th day of July, 1985. Attest: D.Jgene L. Otis, Hayer ex off1c1o C1ty Clerk-Treasurer • I • • ( • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of &lglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on firat reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Gary R. Higbee • ( l I • • - ( • • • • SUPPLP.MENT NO. ~ TO CONNECTOR 'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and betwP.en the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, acting by and through its duly authorized Mayor and City Clerk, hereinafter referred to a a "City , • and SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties, Colorado, hereinafter referred to aa "District,• WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on the 20th day of June, A.D. 1961, the City entered into a Connector's Agreement with the District concerninq the connection of the District sewer collection facilities to the City's sewage system, which Connector's Agreement was modified and amended by agreement dated the 4th day of April, 1966; and WHEREAS, said agreement and modification thereof provided that addit ional service areas could be included within the limits of the District with the written consent of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, it ia agreed as follows: 1. The City does hereby consent to the inclusion of the additional area, s ituate in the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, described a s follows , to wit: Property Owne r: Property Des cription: Sanford Homes, Inc. Aa more fully described in Exh ibi t A attached hereto and incorporated herein by referanc~. into Southgate Sanitation District, and agrP.e& that said actditional area may be served with the sewer facilities of the District, and that thP City will treat the sewage discharged into the City's trunk line from said additional area, all in accordance with the Connector's Agree .. nt dated June 20, 1961, and the modification thereof dated the 4th day of April, 1966, between the City and the District. Accordingly, Exhib it A referred to in paragraph 1 of the Modification to the Connector's • I • • - • ( • • • • Agreement dated the 4th day of April, 1966, is hereby amended to include the additional area as set forth hereinabove. 2. Each and every other provision of the Modification to the Connector's Agreement dated the 4th day of April, 1966, shall remain unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their names and seals to be hereunto subscribed and affixed this __ day of ------------------· 198 __ ATTEST: CITY CLERK (SEAL) ATTEST: SECRETARY (SEAL) MAYOR SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT ARAPAHOE AND DOUGLAS COUNTIES, COLORADO By ~P~RE~S~I~D~E~N~T~---------------------- • I • • ( • • • • EXHIBIT A Beginning at a point on the extended East line of Lot 247, South Denver Gardens, which is 15.0 feet North of the Northeast corner of the said Lot 247, and which is on the center line of the former Williamette Avenue, now vacated, thence South along the East and projected East line of the said Lot 247 and of the adjacent Lot 248, a distance of 658.38 feet to the center line of the former Price or Prince Avenue, now vacated. Thence Westerly parallel to and 15.0 feet South of the South line of Lots 248 and 246, South Denver Gardens, 645.0 feet1 thence North parallel to the East line of said Lot 248, a distance of 329.16 feet, more or less to the extended North line of the said Lot 2481 thence West 25 .0 feet1 thence North 329.16 feet, more or less, to the center line of the former Williamette Avenue, now vacated1 thence along said center line Easterly 670 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado. Together with the West 30 feet of vacated Colorado Boulevard adjoining subject property by vacation ordinance recorded March 28, 1956 in Book 960 at Page 209. • I • • I I I_ L [ [ l l L I I I • • • COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT I- t-n t- = F= v 1\ - a a z z a ~ ~ z z ~ ... ~ a ... Ill Ill .... .... • !! Ill c • a: Ill ~ a: a: ~ CD a: L L ~ 0 ¥ > u a: a: 0 u a: a: Ill Ill Ill u ~ 0 c a: .... .... c 1: a: z z ... • • Ill Ill ... L ~:::i 0 u ., a: Ill a: u ~ Ill ~ ~~~~ ¥ z • Ill a: .... ~ 1: ~ :I a: c c 0 Ill :I L ... L 1: L ., a~ ~ ~ CITY OF ENGI EWOOD, COLORADO I ~ ~ FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1984 • • I . -• • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT the city of englewood, colorado 1-fiscal year ended december 3 I , I 984 G submitted by department of finance • \....JI I • I . • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO -------- DIRECI'ORY OF ELEX::TID OFFICIALS lligene L. otis, Mayor Beverly Bradshaw, Mayor Pro Tern, Council Merri>er, At-Large Joe Bilo, Council Member, At-Large William F. Vobejda, Council Member, District I John Neal, Council Member, District II Jim Higday, Council Member, District III Robert B. Weist, Council Member, District IV Al:l1INISTRATIVE STAFF Andy~. City Manager Peter Vargas, Assistant City Manager Susan Powers, Assistant City Manager for Economic Development Jack Olsen, City Attorney DEPARTMENT OF FINAOCE Gary Higbee, Director of Finance Margaret Freeman, Assistant Director of Finance Alfred Rhoades, Purchasing Agent Julie Lucas, CPA, Chief Accountant • II II I • • - • • 0 En ole wood I Citizens Englewood, Colora do H Mu nic ipal JudQ e ~' Advisory Boords a Commissions r City Counci l I Other Comm issions 8 Au t horities I I I Mayo r and 6 Counc i lmen I I I I f,voter a Sewer Library Ci t y Boord of Hous ino Urban ~ Ad j ustment Rene wa l Boord Boord Att orney and Author ity Author i t y Aooeals 1 Board of Planning 8 Parks 8 l Elect ion Zoning Recreation City Manaoer Career Service Co mm ission II Ant. C ity Manag er ,i Commission Commission Commission a n d Ec onomi c De v e lo pm ent Assistant I I City I I I Manager Pubhc Community Employee Porks 8 Fi nance Works Library Development Relations Recreation ! r-..J--T-------1 i E ng oneenng Wastewater Pollee Fire Utilities Ser voces Treatment 0 H 11 -20 -78 • • )> z z c )> r () =< -< ~ m z Gl r m 8 0 () 0 5 :D )> 0 0 • ~ • • • • ANNUAl FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO ----- Transmittal Letter Finance Director's Report Certificate of Conformance TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY SEX:I'ION FINANCIAL SEX:TION Report of Certified Public Accountants General Purpose Financial Statements Canbined Balance Sheet -All Fund Types and Account Groups PAGE iii xiii 1 2 Canbined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Olanges in Fund Balance -All Governmental Fund Types and Expendable Trust Funds 4 Canbined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Encumbrances, and Olanges in Unreserved Fund Balances - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Basis) -All Budgeted Governmental Types 6 Canbined Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Olanges in Retained Earnings/Fund Balance -All Proprietary Fund Types and Similar Trust Funds 8 Canbined Statement of Changes in Financial Position - All Proprietary Fund Types and Similar Trust Funds 9 Notes to Financial Statements 10 Canbining and Individual Fund and Account Group Statements and Schedule General Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures, and Encumbrances, and Olanges in Fund Balance -Budget and Actual - (Non-GAAP Basis) • 24 II I • II - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENG LEWOOD COLORADO TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Special Revenue Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Cllanges in Fund Balance Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Cllanges in Fund Balance -Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP Basis) Debt Service Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Cllanges in Fund Balance Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Cllanges in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Capital Projects Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Cllanges in Fund Balance Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Cllanges in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual (Non-GAAP-Basis) Special Assessment Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance • PAGE 28 30 32 35 36 37 40 41 42 46 48 I • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUID) PAGE Enterprise Funds Water, Sewer and Municipal Golf Course Funds Canbining Balance Sheet 52 Canbining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings 54 Canbining Statement of Changes in Financial Position 55 water Utility Fund -Statements of Revenues and Expenditures -Budget and Actual 56 Sewer Utility Fund -Statements of Revenues and Expenditures -Budget and Actual 57 Municipal Golf Course Fund -Statements of Revenues and Expenditures -Budget and Actual Internal Service Funds Canbining Balance Sheet 58 60 Canbining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings 62 Canbining Statement of Changes in Financial Position 63 Fiduciary Funds Canbining Balance Sheet -Fiduciary Funds 65 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Balance -Pension Trust Funds 66 Combining Statement of Changes in Financial Position - Pension Trust Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances -Expendable Trust Funds • 67 68 II I • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) PAGE General Fixed Asset Account Group Schedule of Olanges in General Fixed Assets by Fund, Function and Activity 69 Combined Schedule of Investments and Ce ntral Ca s h 70 Schedule of Grant Activity 71 Compliance Report on Single Audit 72 STATISTICAL SECTION General Governmental Expenditures by Function General Governmental Revenues by Source Property Tax Levies and Collections Assessed and Estimated Actual Value of Ta xable Property Property Tax Rates per $1,000 Assessed Valuation - All Overlapping Governments Special Assessment Collections Canparative Ratio of Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and Bonded Debt Per Capita Computation of Legal Debt Margin Computation of Direct and Overlapping Debt - General Obligations Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures Revenue Bond Coverage -Water and Sewer Bonds Debt Service Requirements to Maturity Demographic Statistics • TABLE Nli1BER 1 75 2 76 3 77 4 78 5 79 6 80 7 80 8 81 9 81 10 82 11 83 12 84 13 87 I • • -• • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Property Value, Construction, and Bank Deposits 1984 Assessed Valuation of Ten Largest Taxpayers Miscellaneous Statistical Data CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO 14 15 16 PAGE 88 89 90 l fl (J II I . I f [ (_ I I • • • • • z ~ ::tl 0 0 c (') ~ 0 z I . . - • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Mar c h 31 , 1985 The Honor a ble Mayor: and Members of the City Council 3400 Sou th Elat i Street Eng lewood, Colorado 80110 Dea r: Mayor: a nd Council Members: • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLO RAD O The a nnual financial report for: the year: ended December: 31, 1984, is submitted herewith in compliance with provisions of the Charter: of the City of Engl e wood. Mana gement believes that the data is presented in a manner: designed to accurate- ly set forth the financial position and results of operations of the City as measured by the financial activity of its various funds; and tha t all disclo- sures necessary to enable the reader: to gain the maximum understanding of the City's financial affairs have been included. In developing and evaluating the City's accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls as discussed by the Finance Director: in his accompanyi ng letter: of transmittal, and within tha t framework , I believe that the City's internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide recording of financial transactions . This r e port utilized the guidelines recommended by the Governmen t Fina nce Officers Association of t he United States and Canada. The Government Fina nce Officers Assoc iation awards Certificates of Conformance to those governments whose a nnual financial reports are judged to conform substant ia lly with high standards of publ ic fi nanci al reporting including genera lly accepted accounting principles promulgated by the National Council of Governmental Accounting. Th e City of Englewood was awarded the Certificate of Conformance for its annual financial report for fiscal year 1983. It is my belief that the accompan y i ng 1984 financial report continues to meet Certif i cate of Conformance program standards and will be submi tted to the Go vernmen t Finance Officers Association for r e view . In a c c ordance with the above-mentioned guidelines the accompanying Ci ty of Eng lewood financial r e port consists of three parts: 1. I n t roductory section , including the Finance Director 's letter of transmittal ; 2 . Fi na nc ial section , including the financial s tatements ann supplemental data of the government accompan ied by our independent auditor 's op inion ; I • I • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO The Mayor and Council Members Mar ch 31, 1985 Page 2 3 . Statistical section , including a number of tables of unaudited data depicting the financial history of the government for the past 10 years , information on ove rlapping governments , and demographic and other miscellaneous information . In order to give a complete overview of the City's operations in 1984, included in the Special Re venue Funds are the Eng lewood Downtown Developner.t Au thority and the Englewood Urban Renewal 1\uthori ty. The City maintains oversight responsibility for these authorities, and thus considers them entities of the City. While the City of Englewood completed f i scal year 1984 in a generally sound financial condition, several areas should be closely monitored as we progress through 1985 . The increased competition for the consumer dollar in the south- west metropolitan area should be analyzed on a continuing basis. It will only be through this active monitoring that we will be able to ascertain the fiscal impact that the new Southwest Mall and the new Englewood downtown redevelopnent will have on the City of Englewood . The fiscal integrity of our enterprise funds continues to be a priority for Administration and the City Council. City Council recently denonstrated priority by authorizing drainage constructi on for the Golf Course Fund so it may remain competitive with the growing number of golf courses in the the this that area. Recent economic indicators have shown positive indications that 1985 will be a recovery year. Hopefully, this trend will continue and the City will be able to maintain its economic growth rate. The plan for the redevelopnent of the down- town Englewood area i s a positive step towards maintaining the City's sound fiscal condition for the future and I commend the City Counci l on their fore- sight to see the need for an aggressive econom ic developmen t plan. II • I . • • • • ANNJAL F-INANC'IAL Rf PQFIT C'IT Y OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO March 31 , 1985 To the Honorable Mayor , Members of City Council and City Manager Ci y of Englewood , Color ado The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Englewood Co lorado, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1984, is submi tted herewith in accordance with the provisions of the Horne Rule Charter of the City of Englewood , Colorado, Article X, Section 98 (k). This report was prepa red by the City of Englewood Finance Department. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the presented data and the completeness a nd fairness of the presentati on i ncluding all disclosures, rests with the City. We believe the d ata , as presented , is accurate in all material aspects; that it is presented in a manner designed to f ai rly set forth the financial position and results of operations of the City as mea sured by the financial activity of its various funds; and that all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to ga in the maximum understanding of the City's financial affairs have been included. Accounting System and Budgetary Control In developing and evaluating the City's accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls. Inte rnal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, nssuran~· re- garding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unau horized use or disposition ; and (2 ) the reliability of financial records for preparing fi - nancial statements and maintaining accounta b ility for assets. Th e concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not ex - ceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. Al l internal control evaluations occur within the a bove framework. We believe tha the City 's internal accounting controls ad equa tely safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions . Budgetary control is maintained at the subfunction level by the encumbr a nce of estimated purchase amounts prior to the release of purchase orders to vendors . Purchase orders which result in an overrun of department balances are not released until additional appropriations are approved. Open encumbrances are reported as reservations of fund balance at December 31, 1984. The City's accounting records for general governmental operations a~l e xpend- able trust funds are maintained on a modified accrual basis, with r evenues generally being recorded when received and e xpend itures being recorded when incurred . The City maintains the accou nt ing records for all proprietary and pension funds on the full accrual basis. This report has n developed to conform to generally principles , and to meet the requirements set forth by the III • accepted accounting Government Finance I • • n • • • - ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOO D COL ORA DO Off1cers Association Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting Program . Th e r e port is presented on a "pyramid" approach whereby canbined statements, including notes, are presented in the front of the report and supplemental statements follow . Much emphasis has been placed on the combined or "general purpose" financial statements so that they are considered "liftable" for ana-lytical review. City Administration The City of Englewood is organized under the Municipal Home Rule Laws of Colorado . City government is directed by a seven member city council. The Council is comprised of four members elected from each of the City 's districts , with three members elected at large . This legislative body selects fran its members the Mayor , and appoints a City Manager who is responsible for the City 's operation . City Council meets on the first and third Monday of each mon th at 7 :30 p .m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall , 3400 South Elati , Englewood , Colorado . The Reporting Entity and Its Services The City of Englewood's Comprehensive Annual Financial Re po rt (CAFR) includes all the funds , account groups and entities controlled by t he City . The City provides the full range of municipal services contemp lated by the City Charter . This includes public safety (police , fire , and emergency medical services), highways , streets , water and sewer services , culture and recredtion , public improvements , and general government services including general administration, municipal court services and planning and zoning. The City of Englewood , in determining the entity to be reported on , used the NCGA's guidelines in Statement 3 , "Defining the Governmental Reporting Ent ity ." This statement requires the city to include in its CAFR all entities over which the City exercises oversight responsibility , including entities having spec ial financing relationships with the City , as well as entities whose scope of public services are closely aligned with the City . Entities which meet these requirements, and consequently , are included in the CAFR are the Englewood ~mtown Development Authority , the Englewood Urb~n Renewal Authority , (included in the Special Revenue Funds) and the Pension and Re irement Funds for the City police, fire, and non-emergency employees. The City of Englewood participates with the City of Littleton in a joint ve nture to construct and operate a wastewater treatment facility . Control of his venture is vested in a four member committee , with two members from each City . Oversight responsibilities a r e divided equally between the two Ci ies, and each City holds a 50% ownership. The City of Englewood 's investment in this venture is therefore accounted for on the equity method in the Sewer Fund financial statements. Audited statements for the Bi-city Wastewate r Tr edtment Plant joint ventu re are not included in this report , but ~y be obtained through the Ci y of Englewood or the City of Littleton . IV • I • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO The Englewood Downtown Development Authority was created to improve the econom ic viabi lity of the downtown district. To further this object i ve, the Englewood Urban Re newal Authority was created to acquire and redevelop propert y in the downtown area . The Engl ewood Housing Authority is considered a separate entity (a l though the i nitial board members were appointed by Ci ty Council) because the Au t ho r ity i s f i nanc i ally independent, maintains its own management and staff, and generally ha s compl e te administrative authority . Financial data for the Authority is not incl uded in this report, but may be obtained through the Englewood Housing Au- thority offices located at 3400 South Elati Street, Englewood, Colorado. Cash Management Cash not used for operations during the year, in accordance with the provisions of the Home Rule Charter of the City of Englewood, Section 98(g), was pooled a nd invested in numerous forms of investments, including certificates of depos i t, negotiable certificates of deposit and federal agency securities . For the year, 100% of available cash was invested . By using "float," interest i n the amount of $2,368,398.05 was earned , which resulted in an annua l yield of 10 .64%. General Governmental Functions The General Fund unreserved fund balance for December 1984, was $1 ,593 ,297 com- pared to $1,680,797 the previous year . The fund balance for year end 1985 i s estimated to be $2,555,564. The City's current policy is to maintain a minimum fund balance of $1,000,000 to provide a contingency for either f l uctuations in the City's revenues or emergency purchases . Re venue: Revenu e s (e xcludi ng transfers) in the General Fund totaled $16 ,905,495 in 1984, an increas e of 14.8% over the previous fiscal year. Gener a l Fund taxes produced 81 .1% of the General Fund revenues compared to 84.4% the prev ious year . The amount of revenue from the major sources and differe nces from the previous year are shown in the follow i ng t abulation (reference the GENERAL FUND STATEM ENT OF REVENUES EXPENDITURES AND EOCUMBRAOCES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BJI.LA.OCE BUDGET AND ACI'UAL, NON-GMP BAS I S). Inc r eas e Pe r cent (Decr eas e) Revenue Sources Amoun t of To tal over 1983 Taxes $1 4,201 ,361 81.1 $---r;77o ;s4l Licenses and permits 382,36 8 2.2 72 ,973 Intergover nmental r evenu e 661,31 9 3.8 131 ,59 8 Charges for service 921,261 5.3 48,913 Fines and forfeitures 257,03 1 1.5 (16 ,113) Earnings on invesbnents 340,865 1.9 172,09 6 Miscellaneous revenue 141,280 0.8 (1,36 4 ) -----------------------------$16,905,485 96.6% $ 2,178,644 ----------------------------- v I • • • ANNlJAl FINANCIAL RE:PORT Other Sources Transfers in (PubJic Improvement Fund and Revenue Sharing Fund) Total 594 ,125 $17 ,499 ,610 ========== • • • CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO 3 .4 51 ,166 100.0% $ 2,229,810 ========= ========= Sales and use tax collections are up 16.8% over 19 8 3. This i ncrease is attributable to an i ncrease in construction in the City , as well as increased spending within the City limits . The value of new commercial and residential construction went from $10 ,4 26 ,636 in 1983 to $20 ,375 ,373 in 1984, an increase of $9,948 ,737. Retail sales in 1984 have also increased by $202,08 3 ,3 39 over 1983 . Expenditures : Expenditures and encumbrances for the General Fund totaled $15,854,810, an increase of 9 .3% over 1983 . In addition , transfers to other funds amounted to $1,732 ,300 . Increases in levels of expenditures for major functions of the General Fund over the previous year a r e shown in the following tabu lation (reference the cet1BINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND ENCUMBRANCES , WI> CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE -BUDGET AND ACTUAL): Increase Percent (Decrease) Function Activitl Amount of Total over 1983 General government $ 2 ,738,890 15 .6 $ 70 ,986 Public safety 7 ,321 ,14 9 41.6 639 ,421 Public works 2,834,506 16 .1 279 ,660 Culture and recreation 2 ,739 ,721 15 .6 256 ,994 Debt service 220,544 1.3 96 ,807 -------------------------------Subtotal 15 ,854 ,810 90.2 1 ,343 ,868 -------------------------------Transfers to other funds 1,732 ,300 9 .8 482 ,400 Total $ 17 ,587,110 100 .0 $ 1 ,826,268 ========== ========== ========== The sound financial condition of the General Fund was maintained by excess revenu es over expenditures (excluding transfers) of $1 ,050 ,675 . However , since the City is undergoing major downtown redevelopment and flood control projects, the General Fund transferred the excess of revenues over expendi t ures (including transfers in), plus $87 ,500 from the fund balance to aid these projects. The General Fund's fund bala nce, including the transfers , rema i ns more than adequate . However , the financial status will be conti.nunlly monitored in light of the dernands placed on surplus funds in the 1985 budget. This continued monitoring is especially important as competition fr~n the surrounding areas , such as the Littleton Riverfront Development and Southwest Plaza Shopping Center may cause a deterioration of Englew~'s sales tax base . VI • I • • - • • • • AN~ UAL ~INANCoAL HEPOR1 !,ITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Special Revenu e Funds Special Re venue Funds are created when resources are designatE~ projects. The Special Revenue Funds of following: legally restricted the City include for the Revenue Sharing Fund -established to administer Federa l Re ven ue Sh ari ng funds . State Lottery -established to administer State Lottery funds used only in Parks and Recreation projects . Community Development Block Grant -established to administer State Block Grant funds used to make low interest loans to existing bus i nesses in downtown Englewood to promote revitalization of the area. Englewood Downtown Development Authority (EDDA) -created by ordinance on October 16, 1978 by the City Council of the City of Englewood under authorization of the State Statutes . The EDDA's purpose is to improve the economic viability of Englewood's downtown district. Englewood Urban Renewal Authority (EURA) -created by ordinance on July 17, 1972 by the City Council of the City of Englewood under authorization of the State Statutes. The purpose of the EURA is to redevelop certain blighted areas of the City to promote public welfare . The EURA administers the EURA Projects Fund which issued $16,490,000 worth of Tax Anticipation Bond Notes in 1984 to acquire and develop land in the downtown area . This development includes flood control projects and construction of West Girard Boulevard to link Cinderella City and businesses east of South Broadway Street. Capital Projects Fund (PIF) The City of Englewood continues to have Program fina nced mainly from use tax and year $2 ,123,808 was appropriated in the 1983 . a pay-as-you-go Capital Improvement General Fund transfers. D.Jring the fund as compared to $9,132,110 in The 1983 appropriations were greater than those in 1984 due mainly o thP issuance of $4,600,000 general obligation bonds used to construe th Englewood Recreation Center during 1983 . The current policy is , if additional funds are available in the Gener al Fund a year end, these funds are considered for ransfer to the Capital Projects Fund for specific projects . In 1984 , $525,000 was transferred from the General Fund , and $87 ,431 from th State Lot ery Fund to the Public Improvement Fund. Dur ing 198 4, actual expenditures and encumbrances were $1 ,360 ,826 . The ?~b lic Improvemen Fund had a balance of $806,453 at year end available for appropria ion in 1985. Of the total fund balance of $2,407,356, $783 ,279 i s reserved for encumbrances and $1,624,077 is a "carry forward" on a non-GAAP basis. The "carry forward" is primarily associated with the Storm Drainage appropria ion to be used for Little Dry Creek in conjunction with the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority's efforts to redevelop downtown Englew~l. Future VII • I • - • • • • • AN UAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO requi rements in this area are es i pr ovides an additional $1,021,841 for Wa e r Fu nd $5 milli on. Dry Cr k. The 1985 budge t Comparative data for the last two fi s cal yea rs for the Water Fund is presented i n the following tabulation: Gross revenues (includes system development fees) Expenses (excluding items not requir ing work i ng capital) Total available for debt service Annual debt service Coverage (income available for debt service divided by annual debt service) 1984 1983 $ 4,429,278 $ 3,103,036 1,660,302 1,550,334 -----------·---------2,768,976 1 ,552,702 --------------------960,205 1,168,605 --------------------2.88 1.33 -------------------- Th e future financial status of the Water Fund is favorable with the potential of generating substantial revenues through the sale of water and tap fees from new developments. However, the City continues to monitor the Wat e r Fund on an annual basis to determine the necessity of any potential future rate increases. Some major indicators which are watched are: net income of $686,589 in 1983 to $609,900 in 1984; and working c a pital has increased from $450,282 in 1983 to $482 ,783 in 1984 . Sewer Fund Sewer rates were increased approximately 65% on January 1, 1983 as a result of a rate study which indicated a need for the increase to provide funding for future operating a nd capital needs. Since the Sewer Fund has maintained a strong financial position resulting from the rate increase, no additional rate increases are anticipated in the near future. Comparative data for the last two fiscal years for the Sewer Fund is presented in the following tabulation: Gross revenues (includes system development fees) Expenses (excluding i t ems not requiring working capital) Total available for debt service Annual debt service Coverage (income available for debt service divided by annual debt service) 1984 1983 $ 6 ,126 ,24 1 $ 6 ,882 ,362 2,507,405 2,519,815 --------------------3,618,836 4,362,547 --------------------36 2,745 470,994 --------------------9.98 9.26 -------------------- VIII • I • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO The City presently has a policy requ1r1ng that all tap fees first be used for debt service and certain other costs, with the excess going into a designated expansion account . This amount of $3,101,274 is expected to be used for future plant development. System development fees (tap fees) are those fees received from developers and homeowners for providing plant capacity and sewer service through Englewood and /or sanitation districts. The City has existing connector agreements with 18 sanitation districts to provide sewer treatment. Each connector agreement defines its relationship with the City for service to its customers within these districts. Due to increasing demands made on the City of Englewood's sewer system, plans are being drawn up to increase the capacity of the Englewood Wastewater Treat- ment Plant by approximately SO%. Construction began early in 1984 on the plant expansion and should be completed early in 1985 at an estimated cost of $1,604 ,500. Both Englewood and Littleton will participate in the construction and operation of the expanded facility. Golf Course Fund The City of Englewood owns and operates an 18 hole golf course located at 2101 West Oxford. Comparative data for the last two fiscal years for the Golf Course is presented in the following table: Operating and other revenue: Menberships Green fees Rentals Earnings on investments Other Total operating revenue 1984 $ 19,881 289,008 93,246 24,910 71,927 ---------- 498,972 ---------- Operating expenses (excluding depreciation) Administrative and general 190,358 Commodities and contractual services 213,418 Interest expense 42,313 Total operating expenses Extraordinary item-loss on bond defeasance Net income ----------446,089 $ 52,883 ========== 1983 $ 25,676 302,210 96,165 18,002 70,070 --------- 512,123 --------- 154,974 194,494 34,337 383,805 15,000 $ 11.1,318 =========== The Golf Course has experienced some problems with drainage in the past year, however, this will be corrected by early 1985. The future financial status of the Golf Course is favorable, however, it must be closely monitored duP to increasing competition from surrounding areas such as the Raccoon Creek Golf Course. IX • I • • • • • A UAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Debt Administration The City issued no new bonds during 1985. The Englewood Urban Authority, however , issued $16,490,000 of Tax Increment Bond Anticipation Notes. During the year, $6,500,000 of these notes were refunded. These notes are not legal obligations of the City , nor do they affect the City's legal debt margin. The City's legal debt limi t , the maximum allowed under Charter, is 3% of assessed valuation, or $5,144,602 . Bonds issued to finance the Englewood Community Center the legal limits. the City's Home Rule The General Obligation in 1983 are well wi thin The City continues its fine name in the municipal bond market . '!he last rating the City received was A-1 from Moody's while Standard and Poors was BBB+. Tables 7 through 12 in the Statistical Section of this report presents more detailed information about the debt position of the City. Internal Service Funds The City began operating internal service funds in 1972. Three functions are served by these funds -Central Service, Servicenter, and Self-Insurance. The Central Services function handles all office supplies , printing,ma il , etc., for the City . All departments share in the costs of this function by the use of charge-backs to the users. The Servicenter function, started in 1974, handles all repairs and maintenance to City-owned equipment and vehicles . In 1976 a program was adopted by the City Council to provide funding for capital equipment replacement through the Servicenter . The Self-Insurance Fund began operations in 1974 for the purpose of self-insur- ing a portion of the City's employee benefit program, i.e. basic medical and dental . The estimated liabilities for unfiled claims of $166,195 were fully funded at year end 1984. The City maintains "stop loss" coverage to avoid any adverse financial impact in the event of major losses. Pension Funds The financial condition of the police, fire , and employees' pension fu~1s have been emphasized on numerous occasions. The unfunded liabilities of these pro- grams place a significant financial burden on the City. The unfunded li a bili- ties for the police and fire pension f•lnds use the minimum funding term of 37 years, based on the Colorado Revised Statutes, Section 31-30-805(2) (a). The newest of the three programs, the Employees' Retirement Fu~l for non-emer- gency employees, is by far in the best financial pos ition. Established by local ordinance in 1969 and effective, January 1 , 1970, the plan granted pas service credits to all current employees. X • I • • • • - CITY OF ENGLEWOOD~~ Following is a summary of actuarial valuations for Actuarial the pension funds: Date of Latest Fund Actuarial Valuation Policemen January 1 , 1984 Firemen January 1 , 1984 E}nployees January 1, 1984 Present Value of Accumulated Plan Benefits Vested Non-Vested $4 ,450 ,733 $ 4,864 ,622 2,736,762 176,144 Net Assets Available for Plan Benefits at Valuation Date $ 2,727 ,914 4,330 ,275 4 ,594,13 3 The assumed rates of return used in determining the actuarial present value of accumulated plan benefits were 7 .5% for the policemen's and firemen's funds, and 6 .0% for the employee's fund . City contributions in 1984 amounted to $252,251 , 348 ,072 and 396,674 for the policemen's, firemen's and employee's funds, respectively. Irrlependent Audit The City Charter requires an annual audit to be made of all City accounts by certified public accountants . The accounting firm of Lehman , Butterwick and Co ., P.C., was selected by City Council to audit the 1984 financial statements . This annual audit requirement has been complied with , and the auditor's opinions have been included in this report . Financial Outlook The City of Englewood canpleted 1984 in a strong financial position . With construction of the downtown redevelopment project moving steadily along , and the first year of operations for the Englewood Recreation Center , 1985 should be a year of growth for Englewood. Nevertheless, due to volatile economic pressures, the Finance Department will continue to monitor all economic indicators on a monthly basis. Certificate of Conformance The Government Finance Officers Association of the United State and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting to the City of Englewood for its comprehensive annual financial report for the fiscal ye r ended December 31, 1983. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Conformance, a governmental uni must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Camformance is valid for a period of one year believe our current report continues to conform to Certificate of Program requirements, and we are submitting it to GFOA to de eligibility for another certificate. xr • only. We Confor'Tlance e rmillt" i s I • • • • • ANNUAL FINA NCIAL REPORT __ CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Acknowled~ I should like to express my appreciation to all members of the Finance Depart- ment for their efficient and dedicated service during 1984. A special thanks is extended to the independent certified public accounting firm for their able assistance and for the professional manner in which they have handled the audit for the City's financial records. I would also like to thank the members of City Council and the City Manager's Office for their interest and support in planning and conducting ~~e financial operations of the City in a responsible and progressive manner. Respectfully submitted, I I ("'7 7 / \_t'l. I c;M .y /'. ,~ / c~._(..._., Gary R. Higbee Director of Finance XII I • • • ANNliA~ FINANCIAL RI:PORT • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Englewood , Colorado For its C ompre hensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31 , 1983 A Certificate o f Conformance in Financial Reporti ng is p resented by t he Government Finance Officers A ssoci ation of the United States and Canada to governmental units and p ublic emp loyee retirement systems whose comprehensive annual financial reports (CAFR 's) are judged to substantially conform to program standards Execu tive D irector XIII • I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO T HIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I • • • • • - • - I I (') ~ ID 2 ,... 0 L en -1 l> -1 ,... 1: r ,... ~ en L [ [ l L L [ • ul I • • I • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Be COMPANY. P . C . The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of Englewood, Colorado CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO We have examined the combined financial statements of the City of Englewood, Colorado, as of and for the year ended December 31, 1984, as listed in the accompanying table of contents. Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and, accordingly, included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing proce- dures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. In our opinion, the aforementioned financial statements of the City of Englewood, Colorado, present fairly the financial position of the City of Englewood at December 31, 1984, the results of its operations and the changes in financial position of its Enterprise, Internal Service and Pension Trust Funds for the year then ended, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles which have been applied on a consistent basis with that of the preceding year. Our examination was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the combined financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemen- tal information in the combining and individual fund and account group statements and schedules is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the combined financial statements. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the examination of the combined financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the combined financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying statistical information was not audited by us and, according ly, we do not express an opinion on it. Mar c h 29, 1985 CERTIFIED PU BLIC ACCOUNTANTS 101 25 W. 6th Ave.. Suite 200 lakewood. C o lo rado 80215 (303) 238·5300 1 • I • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO a:telNED 8.\LNCE SMrrr -AU. PlH) 1"tP!S NC> IICXXUfT G10UPS tzi:!Joe!R 31, 1984 O:.....~t.alP\rd~ Prq>r i etary 8pecia1 Dobt ~!tal ~ta l Dlterpr i H ~ ~ ~ Projecu ~ P'urds \note 7) ASSI':I'S Central c:..ah afi! lnwta~ta $ 1,769,695 s 1,261,993 • (25,278) 812, 155.728 589,156 $ 5,317,268 Other cash and i nW!II~ta 1 ,390 75,691 6,631 3,102,294 Certlficatea of depoa it Accounta receivable 360,804 Due f rc:n Bi ..City Joint Venture ~ fre~~~ other goverr'lllenta 33,763 152,670 388,018 57,242 100 ,286 Property tax• recei vable, net 952,752 430,741 l'li~~cell•r.::JW~ receiv.bl• 237,569 81,907 955 48,715 49,230 Other current .... ta 676 Jnventori• of •te.rial .m .uppli .. 88,823 ~ frc. other fund. 38,394 M,078 ...._,t.e nteeivabl.e : Oolrrent O.ferrecS lfil,156 lm.oetta.Jt in Bi..cJty Joint 'loltlnture 7SC,599 (note 3) U,l08,298 antrtcted cuh en~t invabllllmt.e 4,398,01J 1,280, 77 2 Property, plant .00 .;ui ,_.t {net) (note 5) Alaount •VIIUable in debt •rvi ce turda )4,982,148 ~t to be provid-' for r:-y.ent of long-t.111 debt !'DUl-. $ 3,033,563 $ 2,003,678 8 4,373 ,690 512,690,539 $ 1,568,784 $57,389,923 LIABILITIF.S t Oiiren£ ln~~tal~ Of long-tem dlibt (note 4) -$ 695 ,000 Inte~t r:-yab1e 26J 175 ,267 Accounta r:-yab1e 119,282 8,899 560,831 6,050 4l,C4 3 O.ferred ~ 952,752 U0,741 75 4,599 Da to other 9CMt~ta 10,253 30,252 Da to other fund• 97,301 18,078 Ot:hl!lr cun:ent liabil i t1• 90,001 1,113 ,376 llonda p.yeble, inclUI!ing pr•h •, excludi ng curr~W~t i n.ull-\ta (note 4) 1,453,399 8 ,3)9 , 790 Ctptuu..s 1 .... ob li ~tlon., excl..-!irq current 1n.ta1~ta (not• C ard 8) Mol::t~ note, ucl\ding current JMUllaenta (note C) Tax inr:r-.nt band antici petion not .. Other note. p.yable (note 4) Accnal for ~ted (note 4) ·-'totAl liabilttt .. 1,242,288 439,154 0 688,384 1,232,389 10 ,1"4,1!76 CDt1 1~ Alll <Dn'Jt«ZZrn' LIAII JLt'riES (not." 6, 8, ard 10) lnwt~tment In :=r~~r* ... u ContribJtett cepJtal 14,%:,4 14 P\.11) MINCP.S: Rner~ for 81C\Ilbcancn U 7,978 m 2,055,176 Reserved for debt. eervice 4,311,690 (767,10 )1 ANerved for ..,l O)'@e8' rettr_,..t l-"lreMrWCS 1,593,2'97 1,563,117 9,946,979 103 ,498 1'ot.al furd balance (deficit) (note 2) 1, 791,275 1,564 ,038 4 ,)73,00 12 ,002,155 (663.605) I RrrA.INm !'ARNJNGS -RESERV0> 1,280 , 711 • Rr:TA.lNm DJIHINGS -WRESERVm 10, 776,8Gl Total ret•Jned eernJ nga 12,057 ,63 ! 1'otal fund equity 1,191,275 1,564,038 4,373,1590 12,002,155 (66),60S) 47,025,04'7 1'olal ltabillt.l .. and fund .:JUity • ),033,563 s 2,003,1571 • 4,373,1590 512,690,539 S 1,568,7U n7,l89,92l 2 • • • - • • ANNUAL FI N ANCIAL REPORT CI T Y OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO l'iduciuy -..,. ~ ~ Aceaunt ~ ~rarzbl Onlx! InterN! a.n.r::al Clonorol Service Ttuot ri .., .....,_,.., O.O...r 31 o.c..ber 31 ~ !!!:'!!! ~ !!!!!1!. .!!!! .!ru s 1,20),234 $ 38,133 - $ 22 ,109,929 $ U,955,907 25 11,398 ,294 14,584 ,325 10,896,469 t,aso,ooo 104 ,710 f65,5U 184 ,722 731 ,979 1,053,818 l,l8J,t9l 1,113, 78) U I ,J76 29,562 18,908 l6l ,f42 111,026 195 ,017 )59,531 U I ,J54 167,675 136 ,472 16 1,156 205 ,741 7S4,599 1,024 ,)97 12,101,291 11,6$4,864 5,678,185 683,959 1,343,709 20,)95,508 56,721,365 49 ,474 ,276 4,)73,690 4,371,690 l9,067 ,C98 19,067,498 7,160,731 s 2,925,407 I ll , 702,579 S20 ,395,508 $23,441,188 $139,524 ,859 $100,4S0,991 ·-········ -········· 0 280 ,107 $ 975 ,107 154,212 175,530 190,972 34 ,256 3l 840,192 723,~5 2 ,1J8,092 2,lll,l80 40,505 16,909 21,093 136,472 166,195 1,369,572 1,062,624 4 ,495,000 14,288,189 15,452,211 463 ,370 463,)70 586,)21 49),9)3 16,<90,000 493~9]] 16.4~.000 52),941 26,))7 l 1,211, 77 8 1,211, 771 1,279 ,911 200,451 21,124 23,441,188 38,6)0,)40 22,855,212 l 20,195,.501 20,195,501 14,151,)56 I 1 ,406,133 36,374,247 )),311,4)9 2,~.075 4,244,96 1 3,606,517 1928,452 1 11,681,455 11 ,611,455 9,969,144 ll,206,H1 5,116,976 11,681,.55 lO, 749,003 li,401,J l l I • )91,197 1,671,969 1,101,401 • 919,926 11,696,711 I0,5!t4,24S l,Jll,l2J 13,)75, 756 2, 724,9!.6 11,611,.55 20,395,.501 100,194,519 71,595,779 $2,925,407 $11,702,579 $20,395,501 f2)~44 1,111 llt,524 ,15t Sl00,4S0,991 3 • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINA NC IAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO C!J1BINID SI'ATEMDfl' (F REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND YEAR I!Hl!D DEX:El'1BER 31, 1984 Taxes Intergoverrmental revenue 0\arges for services City contributions and assessments Other contributions Licenses and perm! ts Fines and forfeitures Earnings or, investments Miscellaneous EXPENDITURES Current: General goverrment Public safety Public works Culture and recreation Miscellaneous Construction Cap! tal outlay Bond issue costs Debt service: Principal Interest Revenues over (under) expend! tures Other financing sources (uses)- cperating transfers in C\>erating transfers out Proceeds of general obligation bonds EXCESS (DEFIC I EICY) OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINA!CING SOUICES OllER EXPEtlli'ruRES AND CYn1ER ~ES ruNO BALAOCES -JANUARY 1 ruNO BALAOCES -DEX:El'1BER 31 Special Debt Capital Spec ial ~ ~ ~ Projects Assessmen t $14,201,361 $ 211,995 $ 399,631 $ 1 ,191,942 $ 661,319 777,224 578 ,073 921,261 287 ,876 382 ,368 257,031 1,661 340,865 158 ,523 228,789 87 1 ,328 68,286 141,280 1,010 342,158 33 ,166 ----------------------------------------------16 ,905,485 1,150,413 628,420 2 ,983 ,501 389 ,328 -------------------------------------------- 2, 772 ,796 241,296 3,216 ,031 7 ,271,939 1 ,40 2,833 , 797 4 ,14 7 2, 709,412 89 ,02 1 1,000 5,19 7 14,0"' 7 ,048 8 3 ,19 ,9 6 ,44 7 ,210 514,550 145 ,517 2 ,917 75 ,027 3,300 1,276 ,533 160 ,6 5 --------------------------------------------15 ,808,488 255,561 1 ,281, 730 11,63 2,566 213 ,736 --------------------------------------------------1 ,096 ,997 894,852 (653,310) (8,649 ,065) 175 ,592 594,125 111,899 80,000 5,278 ,201 (1 , 732,300) (7 45,031) (2 ,307 ,894 ) 350 ,000 4,947,000 ll,l93 ,000 ------------------------------------------------ (41 ,178) 611 ,720 4, 373 ,690 5, 514.242 175 ,592 1,832,453 952,318 6 ,487 ,9 13 (839 , 19 7) ---------------------------------------------------$ 1 , 791 ,275 $ 1,564,038 $ 4,373,690 $12 ,002,155 $ (663 ,605 1 ··········· ··········· ••••••••••• ••••••••••• ••••••••z-=;.z '!be !ICCO!plnying ootes are an integral pert of this statEI1'ent . 4 • I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO ~ble __ ~~~To~taTl=•~~~- Trust {Hanorand~.~n Only) ~ I984 1981 S -A6,0~,9~A3,~3,U5 2,016,616 2, 760,384 921,261 872,348 287,876 486,084 2,990 2,990 5,084 382,368 309,395 258,692 273,372 1,968 1,669 , 759 542,192 517,614 208,491 --------------------- 4,958 22,062,105 18 ,980,475 ------------------ 6,230,202 3,820,148 7,288,347 6,393,487 3 ,319,944 2,985,251 2, 798,433 2,469,955 4,489 23,765 37,170 910,160 1,991,919 6,447,210 568,320 514,550 148,434 73,826 1,515,525 187,698 -------------------------- 4,489 29,196,570 18,527,774 ---------------------------- 469 (7 ,134. 465 ) 452,701 6,064,225 (579,900) (4 , 785,225) 16,490,000 4,600,000 --------------------- ----------- 469 10,634,535 4,472,801 19,814 8,453,301 3,980,500 I • • -------------------------------- $ 20,283 $19,087 ,836 $ 8,453,301 ··········· ··········· ··········· 5 • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WO OD COLORADO CXM!INID STATDIENT CF REVENUES, EXP!XJI'IVRES, AND l!I!CIHIRA!CES AND 011\NGES IN llNRESERVID rutv 1WMCEs -BWGET AND 1CruAL (101-GMP BI\S IS) ALL 8UlGETm 00\IER!Io!Dn'AL nHJ TYPES !'OR 'nfE YEAR EM>ID lli!C!MIER 31, 1984 Genera 1 Fund Var1ance l'avorable (tlnfavorable) Special Revenue REVENUES Taxes $13 . 405.405 $14. 201, 361 Licenses aOO permits 276,000 382,368 Intergovernnental 658,151 661,319 Charges for services 917,434 921,261 Fines and forfeitures 296,500 257 ,031 Earnings on deposits 159,000 340,865 Miscellaneous 87,897 141,280 -----------------Tota 1 revenues 15,800,387 16,905,485 ------------ EXP!XJITURES AND f20M!RA!cES General goverrment 2,871,914 2, 738 ,890 Public safety 7,330,631 7 ,321,149 Public works 2,847,100 2,834,506 Culture a nd recreation 2 ,829,637 2, 739,721 Storm drainage Capital outlay Bond issue costs Debt service: Principal 145,517 145,517 Interest 75 ,027 75,027 ----------Total expend! tures and encurbrances 16 ,099 ,826 15,854,810 ---------- Revenues over (under) expenditures and encurbrances (299,439) 1,050,675 O'lliER FI!WCI ~ 00URCES (USES) -Transfers in (note 9) 616,525 594,125 Transfers out (1, 732,300) (1 , 732,300) Proceeds fran general obligation bonds ---------------- Revenues over (under) expend! tures and other sources (uses) (1,415,214) (87 ,500) Variance Favorable ~ ~ (Unfavorable) $ 795,956 212,699 $ 211,995 $ (704) 106,368 3 ,168 695 ,000 777 ,224 82,224 3,827 (39,469) 100 1 ,661 1,561 181 ,865 15,770 158 ,523 142,753 53,383 1,010 1,010 -------·------------------------·-1 ,105,098 923,569 1,150 ,413 226,844 ---------------------------·----- 133,024 9,482 327,683 242,249 85,434 12,594 89,916 7,969 (7 ,969 ) 2,600 2,917 (317) 4,300 3 ,300 1 ,000 ---------------------------------- 245,016 334,583 256,435 78,148 ------------------------------ 1 ,350,114 588,986 893,978 304 ,992 (22,400) 111,899 111,899 (745,031) (745,031 ) 350,000 350 ,000 -------------------------------------- 1,327, 714 305 ,854 610,846 30 4,992 UNRESERVID miD IIAI.AI«:E-JANUARY 1 1,299,978 1,680,797 380,819 297,425 952,271 654,846 ----------------------------------------------------UNRESERVID rutv IIAI.AI«:E-DEX::D1BER 31 $ (115,236) $1,593,297 $1,708,533 $ 603,279 $ 1,563,117 $ 959 ,838 -········· ······-·· .......... ··········· ········=~· .............. ... 'nle IIICC'O!!J>!nying notes are an integral part of this stat......,t. Please refer to "IIOOgetary Data" in Note 1 for a detailed explanation regarding the above presentati on. 6 • I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Debt Service ca11i tal Projects !Public !!!Ji!rovaoentl Totals (Hemorandlml Onl:z:l variance variance Van a nee Favorable Favorable Favorable ~ Actual !Unfavorablel ~ ~ !tlnfavorablel ~ Actual (Unfavorable) 398,291 $ 399,631 $ 1,340 $ 725,000 $1,191,942 $ 466,942 $14,741,395 $16.004.929 $ 1 ,263,534 276,000 382 ,368 106,368 439,152 578,073 138,921 1, 792,303 2,016,616 224,313 917,434 92 1 ,261 3,827 296,600 258,692 (37 ,908) 32,807 228,789 195,982 340,000 871,328 531,328 547,577 1 ,599,505 1 ,051 ,928 1,093,080 342,158 (750,922) 1,180,977 484,448 (6 96,529) ---------------------------·------------------------------------ 431,098 628,420 197,322 2,597 ,232 2,983,501 386,269 19,752,286 21,667 ,819 1 ,915,533 --------------------------------------------------------------------- 5,200 5,197 864,165 605,952 258,213 4,068,962 3,592,288 476,674 34,715 760 33,955 7,365, 346 7,321,909 43,437 721,365 514,135 207,230 3,568,465 3,348,641 219,824 238,345 105,632 132,713 3,067,982 2,845,353 222,629 365,218 134,347 230,871 365,218 134,347 230 ,871 17,880,865 7. 719 ,107 10,161,758 17,880,865 7 . 727,076 10,153,789 514,550 (514,550) 514,550 (514,550) 148,117 148,434 (317) 1,276,532 1 ,276,533 (1) 593,926 1,354,860 (760,934 ) -------------------------------------------------------------- 1,28 1 , 732 1 ,281, 730 20,104,673 9,594,483 10,510,190 37,058,881 26,987,458 10 ,071,423 ------------------------------------------------------------------- (850,634 ) (653,310 ) 197,324 (17,507 ,441) (6 ,610 ,982) 10 ,896,459 (17,306 ,595) (5,319,639) 11 ,986,956 80,000 80,000 6,175, 700 5 ,278,201 (897 ,499 ) 6,984,124 6,064,225 (919,899 ) (2,387 ,894 ) (2,307 ,89 4 ) 80,000 (4,865,225 ) (4, 785 ,225) 80,000 4,947,000 4,947 ,000 13,356,085 11,193,000 (2 ,163,085) 18,653,085 16,490,000 (2 ,163,085) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4,176,366 4, 373 ,690 197.324 (363,550) 7 ,552, 325 7 ,915 ,875 3 ,465 , 389 12,449 ,361 8,983,972 423,872 2,394,654 1 ,970, 782 2 ,021,275 5,027 . 722 3,006 ,44 7 I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------• • $ 4,176,366 $ 4,373,690 $ 197,324 $ 60,322 $9,946,979 $9,886,657 $ 5,486,664 $17,477,083 $11 ,990,419 ········•··· -········· -········· -········· .......... . ......... ···~~~~······· -········· ............... 'nle !!CCa!pn:z:i ng not• are an i nt!IJral ert of this atat-t. Please refer to "'ludqetary Data" in Note l for a detailed explanation regarding the above presentation. 7 • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WO OD CO LO RADO CXH!INID STATI>iEHr <F REVENUES, EXPD<SES, AND O!ANGES IN RE'i'AINID EARNINGS/PUNl BALAICE AU. POOPRIETARY !'tiD TYPES AND SIHILAR TRUST ftiDS OPERATING REVENUES Olarges for services Billings to departments Billings to joint venturer Dividend and interest incane Contnbutions Miscellaneous OPERATING EXPD<SES Insurai'K."e claims and premhns Direct system operating costs City's share of Bi<ity joint venture cperating expen.ses Personal and achinistrative services Olstcmer accounting and collection Camodittes and contractual services Cost of JMterial used Depredation Benefit. paid Other YEAR fHl!D I>!OM3ER 31, 1984 Proprietary Punds Enterprise P'Un:ls 5 7,114,337 5 Internal Service ~ 2,224,600 30,070 1,053,671 1,126, 783 160,364 --------------------------- 7,114,337 2,254,670 2,340,818 ------------·-----·---------- 1;369,066 1, 780,764 628,834 383,000 222,164 881,494 751 ,834 330,781 361,569 571,679 257.797 590,448 Unrealized loss co marketable securities Eacr01o1 agent fees 187,655 Miscellaneous 27,360 l7 ,965 11,868 -------------------5,452,977 2,291,625 629,676 ------------------- I~ (UlSS) FRQ1 OPERATIONS, BEFORE OPERATING 1'RA115FERS 1,661,360 (36 ,955) 1 , 711,142 ------------------------- OiliER I~ (EXPENSE) Gain on sale of land 1,178,802 Earnings on investments 852,332 119,540 Interest expense (648,869) Miscellaneous 51,089 16,094 -------------------·-------1,433,354 135 ,634 ----------------------INIXME BEI'ORE OPERATING 1'RAIISFERS 3,094, 714 98,679 1, 711 ,142 OPERATING TRAIISl'ERS (note 9) (1,279,000) -------------·---------NET I~ BEfORE EX'l'RAORDINARY ITD15 1,815, 714 98,679 1,711,142 EXTRAORDINARY IT!l'I-UlSS ON BONl Da'F.ASANCE NET!~ 1,815, 714 98,679 1, 7ll,142 RETAINID EARNINGS/PlJNl BALAICE..JANUARY 1 10,443,209 1,219 ,444 9, 950,030 TRANSFER TO OJIITRIOOI'!D CAPITAL (201, 290) ---------------------------RETAINID EARNINGS/FUND BALAICE-D!X:DIBER 31 512,057,633 5 1,318,123 $11,661,172 •.......... ....•...... ··········· Totals HBnorandtn Only Year ErxSed I:leca!iJer 31 Dece!ber 31 illi ~ $ 7,114,337 2,224,600 30,070 1,053,671 1, 126,783 160,364 5 7 ,596,131 1 ,993 , 785 41,831 827,907 1,090,803 7,804 --------·------------ 11,709,825 11,558,261 ------------------- 751,834 811,895 1,369,066 1,299,498 1, 780,764 1,651,648 959,615 847,689 383,000 363,000 583,733 506,229 571,679 551,084 1,139, 291 1,162,016 590,448 550 ,484 187,655 192,889 218,424 27.360 20 ,389 29,833 24,936 ------------------- 8,374,278 8,200,181 ------------------- 3,335,547 3,358,080 -------------------- 1,178,802 971,8 2 544, JiO (648 ,869) (650,257) 67,183 41 ,352 -------------------1,568,988 (6 4,515 ) -------------------4,904,51:5 ",293 ,54 5 (1 ,279 ,000) ------------------3 ,625,5)5 3,293 ,545 (190 ,000 ) 3,625 ,535 1,103 ,545 21,612,683 18,584 ,908 (201 ,290) (75 , .,.,o, ------------------- $25,036,928 511 ,612 ,68J ........... ••••:a:•a:••za 'Itae aC'C?!J)anying notes are an integral eert of th i s BUt&N!Ot. 8 • I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WO OD COLORAD O OMIINED S'l?.T1>1Dn' CF OWIGES IN FINAICIAL !'OSITION ALL PIOOPRI !TARY P'lHl TYPES AN:> SIHILAR TRim l'tNlS YEAR !H>!D DfJ:II>ef!R 31, 1984 Fiduciary Totals Pr~rieta!:l Pund ~ ~ (MII!!Irorand~.~n Onl~~ Year Enied Internal Pins ion Ilecomber n---Ilecomber 31 Enterpriee Service Trust 1984 1983 SOOIO:s CF WORltiNG CAPITAL Net irlC'ale before extraordtnary Ita $1,815,714 98,679 $1,711,142 $ 3,625,535 s 3,293,546 Extraordinary ittm-loes on bonS defeasa~ (190,000) -----------Net i nc:aoe (loas) 1,815, 714 98,679 1, 711,142 3,625,535 3,103,546 Items not requiring (providing) working capital: Depreciation 881,494 Abardorment of utility plant ond equipaent 257.797 1,139,291 1,162,016 Gain oo sale of laOO and e:JUipnent (1,178. 802) (12,823) (1,191,625) 3,550 ----------------Working capital provided by operations 1,518,406 343,653 1, 711,142 3,573,201 4,269,112 Proceeds fraa sale of land 1,279,000 1,279,000 Proceeds frcn aale of I::Jc:nis 2,280,000 Proceeds from d i apoei tion of fhed aaseta 46,243 46,243 Contributions 928,256 8,180 936,436 72,282 5yst ... developnent fees 1,857,932 1,857,932 2,440,002 Contribution frCJa federal and () state qoverraenta -Bi~ity joint venture 150 150 2,236 ------------------Total aources of work ing capital 5,593, 744 398,076 1, 711,142 7 ,692, 962 9,063,632 ----------------- USES CF WORltiNG CAPITAL 1dd1 tlons to plant W 8l'Jlpaent 1,680,829 289,220 1,970,049 567 ,882 Reductions in long-teem debt 703,922 703 ,922 2,661,44 0 Investment in Bi-city Joint Venture 759,231 759 ,231 543,738 Increase in restricted caah 596,813 596,813 377 ,226 ----------Total uses of working capital 3, 740,795 289,220 4,030,015 4,1 50 , 286 --------!!CREASE (D!J:REASE) IN WORKING CAPITAL 1,842,949 108,856 1, 711,142 3,662,947 4,91),346 WORJ<It«; CAPITAL -JAI«JARY 1 5,150,671 1,272,392 9 ,950 ,030 16 ,373 ,093 11 ,459,747 -----------------WORJ<It«; CAPITAL -Ilf.ClMIER 31 $6,993,620 $1,381,248 $11,661,172 $20. 036.040 516,373 ,093 ........... . .......... I !CREASE ( Dl!l::IW.SE ) IN 1«lR!CING CAPITAL REPRf:SEHrm BY Increase cc:teCreaae) In current aaaeta Cash $2 ,078,113 (71 ,920) 10,189 s 2,016, 382 53,42),057 Investments 3 , 539 ,779 3 ,5)9, 779 4, l96,4SO Certificates of clepoeit (1 ,850,000) {1 ,850,000) 13 ,1,0,000 1 Recei vablea (81,245) (5 ,196) (86,441 ) 481,984 Due f rcra other goverrnents 68,667 28,212 %,879 C85 ,1j71 I Inventor in (11,941) 92,620 80,679 n ,4ll Deposits (2 ,175) (2 ,17 5) {2 , ""~l I Prepa id i nsurance ( 813) (813) 9 ,602 -----------2,053,594 17,712 1 , 722 ,984 3, 794,290 4,912 ,0~2 ----------Increase {decrease) in current liabilities OJrrent installments of long-teen debt (15,000) (15 ,000 ) (210 ,000 J I Interest payable (15 ,697) (15,697) (35,11AJ • • Accounts payable (51 ,189) (33 ,270) 11,842 (72 ,617) (26 ,851 Es timated dental and bila ic med ical clo iml payable (55 , 73 1) (55 , 731 ) 4,118 Unea n*.i revenue 277 .537 277,537 3:2 ,r.{ Other fees poyoble 14,994 ( 2,143) 12,851 4,224 210,645 (91,144) 11,842 --------- 131,343 (1 ,25~1 ------·--!!CREASE (DI!l::JW.SE) IN WORKING CAPITAL $1,842,949 $ 108,856 $1,711,142 $ 3 ,662,947 $4,91), 146 •.......... The acc:arpanyinq notes are •n tnt!C)r•l f!tt of thb ata~t. 9 • • • • • - ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO CITY OF EN:;[.DiOOD OOTES ro FINAICIAL STAT!MEm'S Deceti:>er 31, 1984 (1) S>.mnary of Significant Accounting Policies 'nle accounting pollc1es of the city of i!hglewood conform to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to govermental units. Following is a SLmnary of the m:>re significant policies: Reporting Entity 'nle accarpanying financial statE!Il'ents include the various furds ard account groups of the City of Englewood; the Englewood, Colorado , Downtown Developrent Authority (EDOA); ard the Englewood, Colorado , Urban Renewa l Au thority (EURA). In determining the reporting entity, the City has considered the following cr i ter ia : exercise of oversight respons i bility, scope of public service, and special f inanci ng relationships. Man ifestati ons of oversight include: • Financial i nterdeperdency • Selection of governing authority • Designation of managE!Il'en t • Ability to significantly i nfluence operat i ons • Accountability for fiscal matters Legal constra i nts are not considered a controlling faetor in determining the report ing entity. 'nle EllOA is included in the reporti ng entity due to the following: Board nsnbers are appointed by the City Council ard include one Council nsnber. 'nle City has significant control over EIJOA's operations 'nle EIJOA's acti vities benefit the res idents of the City , m:>St i nportantly its downtown businesses . 'nle EURA is included i n the reporting entity due to the following : Board nsnbers are appointed by the City Council ard include one Council nsnber 'nle EURA is staffed by City errployees ard i s executive director is a City errployee. 'nle City Council reviews ard approves the EURA's budget. 'nle EURA's purpose is to rehabilitate and reclevelop areas of the C1ty according to a plan approved by the Counci I. As m:>re fully described in Note 3, the City participates with the Ci ty of ~lttleton 1n a joint venture IE!9arding the operation of a wastewa er treatment faciltty. Con rol of the venture is vested in a four-ment>er carmi tee , with two nsnbers appointed by each C1ty. OVersight responsibilities are divided fairly equally bet_.n the two cities, ard ownership is held 50\ by each City . Variable operating expenses are shared based on actua l plant usage, and fixed expenses are shared equally. '!he City's investment in this joint venture is therefore accounted for on the equity rre t hod i n the Sewer Fund financial statE!Il'ents. S>.mnary financial information for the Bi-<:ity Joint Venture for Deceti:>er 31, 1984 follows: Assets Liabilities (all current) Venturer's Equity Revenues Expend i tures Net increase in Venturers' Equity Other financing sources (uses) Venturers' Contributions ~ S24,488,872 272 ,276 24,176,596 2,958,680 3,646,880 906 ,868 l, 518,163 City of Englewood Share 10 Sl2 ,244,4 36 136,138 12 ,088,298 l , 780 ,76 4 2,124. 963 453,434 759 ,082 • the year ended I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENG LE WOO D , COLORADO 'lhe Venture has no long-term iOOebtedness. 1he City of Englewood Housing Authority has been excluded fran the reporting entity, although the nurtleu of the Authority's Soard are initially Council-appointed, and the Authority operates withi n the boundaries of the City, because the Authority is financially irdependent of the City, has ita own rMMC}flftent and staff, and generally has C:XItf)1ete a.Di nist.ntive authority. Financial statements fraa f'lX». and PJJRA are included i n the accarpanying financid statements as follows: Ca!ponent 1'\Jnd fi:O\ Genera 1 f\md EDDA Gc!nera l Fh:ed Assets !1:0\ General Long-Tez:m Debt !lJRA General f'Und l!ltiRA Cap! tal Projects 1'\Jnd !liRA General Fixed Mseta Et1RA General Long-Term Debt fhti ty P'Und/Account Croup ~ial Revenue General P'1xed Aaeete General Long-Term Debt ~ial Revenue Capt ta 1 Pro jecta Genera 1 Fixed Aneta General Long-Term Debt f'urrj Accounting 1he accounts of the City are organized oo the blllais of funds or account 9Youpe:, each of wh ich is considered to be a separate accounting entity. The operat ions of each fund are accounted for by providing a separate Rt of eelf-balanc::ing accounts \otlich cmpr:tae ita assets, li abil ities, fund bl!llance, revenues and experditures. 'ftW! following fund types and account groups are used by the City: Goverl"'''''fmtal Funds The General P\Jnd -to account for all financial rHOUrc::es except thoee requ f red to be accounted for in another fund. 5pecial Revenue l"Unds -to account for the proceeds of ~~pe<:if ic revenue sources (other than special as&es!llments or for ftll!ll jor capital projects) that are legally restricted to expenditure for specified purJX*!S. At present. the Special Revenue funds include the Revenue Sharing fund, the qeneral funds of c:atpaoent units {Etn\ and P.lJRA) , the Caml.Jni ty Developrent Block Grant fund and the State Lottery fuoo. Debt Service l"Unda -In 1984,the City established a debt service fund to account for interest am pr incipal payments r~rdillCJ the 1983 Camuni ty Center bond iuue. 'nle EXJRA establ i shed a debt eervice fund to account for principal and interest payments and certain "Aetserve" accounts required by the identure regarding the Ta x Anticipation Notes issued. Capital Projects (Public lnprovement} f'Unda -to account for financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of rMjor capital facilities (other than those financed by proprietary fur.:ta or special assessment funds), including those of the ElJRA. Sub8tant ially all of the City's capital projects are accounted for in the Public lrrprovement P'Und. 'nle capi tal projects of the fl1RA are accounted for separately, and the City has, in 1984, established a Special Construction Pund. \oo'hose activities will be coor~ ina ted with the I!11RA projects. Special Aases~nent Funds -to account for the linancing of PJblic i npr-ovatents or •rvices deemed to benefi t the properties aga i n.t wh ich 11pec i al assessments are levi ed. Proprietary f\Jrk!a !:nterprise Funds -to account for operations that are f1nai"'Ced ard operated in a manner similar to private b.Jstness enterprises where the intent o f the governing body is that the coats (expenses, including depreciation) of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis be financed or recovered primarily through uaer charges. 'nle enterprise funds of the City include the Water, Sewer, and Golf Course fuOOa. 'nle Water and Sewer funds account for the provision of water and sewer tervic::es to the resi dents of the City and of certain other I!Unicipelities aOO un incorporated areas of Arapahoe County. All activities necessary to provide .uch services are accounted for in tMse funds, including. but not limited to, acbinistratlon, operatiorw, maintenance, financing and related debt aervice, and billing and collection. ~rat ion and matntenanc::e of the City golf course, and financing am related debt Mrvic:e , are accounted for in the Golf Course P\rd. Internal Service ~ -to account for the financing ot 900d• or •rvic:ee provided by one dilpertlllent or agency to other cleparO.Ota or .genet" of the C)OVertr~Wnt.al tr~lt on a cost reinb.Jr...-..nt baata. The internal eerviee fln.ia of the City incluc.te the Central Servic»e fund, 11 • I • • • • • ANNUAL FINA NCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO the Servicenter P\ln:t, and the Self-Insurance P'Und. 'ftle Central Services FU~ bCCOUnts for the costs of qeneral office eervices and supplies provided to the var.ious City departments. Billings .ue at estimated actual cost, including depreciation. 'Ihe Servicenter provides repair and maintf!fllllnce services, including autanot i ve equipnent , to various City departments. Bill i ngs are a t estitMted ~ual cost, i ncluding depreciation, plus eight percent to provide for equ i (l'l'lent replacement. 'Ihe Self-I nsurance FUnd bas ically accounts for rredical and certain other coverage for City EITployees. Billings, claims payable, a nd reserves are based upon an annual repor t of an att:~loyee benefits consultant , wh ich also cdninisters the various plans. Fi duci ary f\J.nds Pension Trust Funds -to account for the Policemen's and the Firemen's Pension FUnds , and the f)tployees' Ret irement Fund . 9.Jbatantially all City arployees are covered under these plans , or under the plan initiated by the State o f Colorado (see Note 6 ). Expendable Trust f\Jnds -to account for aesets held by the City in a trustee capacity where principal and ii"'C'ane may be expended in the course of des i gnated operations. At present , the only such trust funds are the Mall ey Center Trust P"Und, which is used to account for rmn ies held by the City as trustee !or the senior citizens recreation center knc:M'1 as the "Elsie Malley Cent ennial Center", and the Parks and Recreation Trust Fund, wh ich is used to account for monies donated to the City as trustee to expaOO programs and facilities for the City's Parks and Recreation Department. Acx::ount Groups General Fixed Assets -to account for all fixed assets of the reporting entity not accounted for in the proprietary fun:Js. General Long-Term Debt -to account for all urrnatured long~term i rdebtedness of the reporting entity not accounted for in the proprietary or special assessrrent funds. Basis of Accounting Basis of accounting refers to ~ revenues and expend i tures or elq)enses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements . Bas is of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made , regardless of the neaaureraent focus applied. '!he ftl:ldif ied accrual basis of accounting is followed for the qoverrwmtal funds (grneral, specia l revenue, debt service , capital in.,rovanent , and spec ial assessment ), and the experdable trust funds. Under this met hod, expenditures, other than tnterest on long-term debt, are recorded when the li abi lity is i ncurred, exoep for lnMtured interest on epec1al assessment indebtedness aecured by interest -bNr ing special assestment levtes; and revenues are recorded ~ received, unless susceptible to accrual, i.e., measurable and available to fi nance the City's operations. S1gn iftcant revenue eources i n the qoverrmental funds considered not to be auac::ept ible to accrual include sales aoo use taxes, cigate te tax, licenses and permits, d"larges for services , and fines and forfeitures. 'ftle accrual basis is followed by the propr ietary funds and the pPn&ion trust funds. a.dgetary Data The C1ty adopts an annual budqet generally for NC'h of iu funds , e xeept internal service , special assessment and trust funds in SeptenDer of each year for the follow i ng calendar yeat. Budgets are prepared on the same baa 1a aa that U8ed for accounting purposes except as follows: (l) Expend itures for budgetary p.zrpooses include enc::uTb r ances. (2) Enterprise funds include debt service and capital expenditures aM exclude depreciation for budget pu rposes. Approval of the City Council fa required !or budc}et reviai0011, except that the City Manager may transfer any ~red appropnation !rom one expenditure classifi- cation to another within the sa:ne department, office , or agency. Accordingly, the City COtWideu ellpenditurea catpared to appropr i ati0011 for an entire department/d1 - viaion (Cimenl P'Und ) or fund (all other fundal to be an appropnate budqet ~rison for pur(XI!Hs o! de erm.ininq whether a legal violation e xists . t1nenc:I..ITbered epproprtatiONI lapee at the elose of the calendar year. Individuel b.xtqeury carperiaona in the ~nying CCI!O i ned financial statanenta are preaented •t leaat • the level cf control conaideud neceaury to identify any legal violation.; and, within the General f\md, at a level in the i nd ividual fund statements to f.cllitAte r110re dt"'tailed financial anelyala. Budge ed ..::»Un • a.re u ong1nally adopted, or u 8lilerded by the City Council at vuioua till'lell during the year. Siqnificant ~tl included • total of $2,279,000 appropriated for the Special Construction Pund; •rd n ,•oo,ooo tren•ferred from the Public lnprOWI'I'ent P\n! to the I!11RA lot land ~Ja itton. Other ~t• were not mlltertel Jn relation to the odqinal appropdatione -.t'lich were amended. 12 • I • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO Because budgeted expend1tur:es include encurbrances, the balances in the "actual" col~ in the acc."'Ol"panying Statenent of Revenues, Experditures al'\1 Ent.vttlrances and Ou!lnges in Unreserved f\lnd Balance -Budget and Actual differ fran expeOOi tures reported in the Carbined Staterrent of Revenues, Expenditures and Olanges in P\md B!llance. Bealuse eocutbrances are included for budget carpariaon, "'actual" reverues and expenditures in this statement reflect changes in the Wlteaerved portion of fund balance, except for debt service whose fund ~lance is considered fully reserved. A reconciliation of budgeted amounts to revenues a nd expenses or expenditures per qenerally accepted accountiOCJ principles (GMP) for budgeted goverrmental funds follows: ~Ia! Debt Public Generd Revenue Service lnprovement Fund ~ ~ ~ RevenuE!&, per GA.AP and budgetary basis 516,905,485 Sl, 150,4 13 628,42 0 s 2 ,983,501 Expend itures, per GMP $15,808,488 255,561 1,281, 730 $11,532 ,566 Feserve for enc:utt>unces: Oecetber 31, 1983 (lSI ,656) (47) (4,093,259) Oeca!ber 31, 1984 197,978 921 2 ,055,176 E:xpend1t.ures, budgetery basis SlS,854,8lO S 256,435 $1,281,130 $9 ,494 ,483 !no.nbrancee b'iCil!&'anoe accounting lS tnployed by the <)Overmental funds. Under this method, purdla-ae orcSen, ccntucta aOO other CO!Initments for the future ewpenditure of funds are recorded u • r@RtVII ion of fund balance based on the ~red appropriation .Uthority c:erritd OYer, and do not constitute expenditures or liabilities. I nveatznenu Pen~ion plan inYH u ace stated a the lower of cost or market value at ~r-end . Ottwr i~W~Ntmen • are Stilted lit coat or anortized cost, which approximates market. Prcperty Tax Pr~rty t.xet~ are l~ied by ~r 1 of eadl year, and are due in full the following year. 1tle lien date lS January 1 following the levy. Taxes may be pa id in equal insullmenu, on or before February 28 and July 31; or in full, on or before ).pril 30. Property taxes are collected by Arapahoe County and then rErRitted to the C1ty. SUch taxu are initially recorded as a receivable and deferred revenue, and eubeequently recognized aa ceverue W'hen IMde available to the City . Inventories Inventor!• consist of material and supplies used in the course of operations and are atated at cost (lint in-fast out basis), f>ixed Aaaeu and Long-Term Liab1lities 'the accounting and reporting treatment applied to the fixed assets and long-term liabilities associated wi h a fund are determined by its tnellsurement focus. All qoverrmental funds and expendable trust funds are accounted for on a spending or "financial flow" measurenent focus. This means that only current assets and current liabilitin are generally included on thelr b!llance sheets . Their reported fund balance (net current assets) 1s eoneidered a sure of "available spendable resources." Govetl"'nental fund operating statements present Increases (revenues and other financing aourcea) aOO decreases (l!xpenChtures and other financing uses) in net currf!nt assets. Accordlngly, they are said to present a SUtmary of sources and uses of "available ~ble resources" during a period. Fixed assets used in <)Overrrnental fund type operations (general fixed assets) are o!ICCOUnted for Jn the General Fued Assets Account Croup, rather than in 1}0\lerrmental funds. Public dcma in ("infrastructure") general Cued assets consisting of C@rta.in lJ'It)rovanenta other than b.uldings, Including roads, bndqes , curbs and gutters, •treets and sidewalks, drainage systens, and li9hting systems, are not reported along with other general fixed assets , although the City and the ElJRA ru i ntain records for auch expenditures. No depreciation has been provided on general fixed assets. f>hed a .. ets are valued at historical cost or estimated hietorical coat if aetual historical coat Ja not available. Donated fixed aaseu are va.lued at their estimated fair velue on the date donated. 13 • I • • • • • ANNUAL FINA NCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Long-term liab ilities expected o be financed fran governnental funds are accounted for in the General Long-Term Debt Account Group, not in the goverrnental funds. The single exception to this general rule is for special assessmE!'nt bonds , which are accounted for i n Special Assessment Funds . See Note 4 for a sumnary of notes payable a rd bonds outstanding for the reporting entity . 'll1e blo account groups are no "fuOOs •• , 'Mley are concerned only with the rreasurenent of financial fX)Sition. 'Ihey are not i nvolved with ITII!aSUten'Eflt of results of operations. Noncurrent portions of long-term receivables due to goverrmental funds , if any, are reported on their balance sheets , in spite of their spending neasurement focus. Speci al reporting treatments are used to indicate , however, that they should not be considered "available spendable resources ," since they do not represent net current a ssets . Recogniti o n of governmental fund type revenues represented by noncu r rent receivables is deferred unti 1 they becane current receivables. Because of their spend ing rreasurenent focus , expenditure recognition for qoverrmental fuOO types is limited to exclude anounts represented by noncurrent l iabilities. Si nce they do not affect net current assets , such long-term arrounts are not recogn i zed as goverrrnental fund type expenditures or fund liabilities. They are i nstead reported as liabilitie s in the General Long-Te rm Debt Account Gr oup. All proprietary funds and pension trust funds are accounted f o r on a cost of services or "capital maintenance" mea surement focus. Th is means that all assets and all liabilities {whether current o r noncurrent) associated with their activity are included on their balance sheets. 'their reported fund equ ity (net total assets) i s segregated into contributed capital and retained earnings canponents. Proprietary fuOO type opera ting statements present incr eases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in net total assets . Depreci ation of all exhaustible fixed assets used by proprietary f unds is dlarged as an expense aga i nst their operations. Accurulated depreciation is reported on proprietary fund balance sheets. Depreciation has been provided over the estiJMted useful lives using the straight line methOO. 'I'he estimated useful lives a re as follows: Water distribut ion system 5eo<age collection sys em Water treabnent plant 5eo<llge treatment plant Raw water service facilittes Treate1 water s torage Buildings Vehi cles Machinery and equipnent 50 years 50 years 50 years 50 years 15-50 yea r s 15-50 years 50 years 2-15 years 2-25 years Systems Developnent Fees Systems developnent fees represent contnbuttons frO'TI subdividers f o r system additions and construct i on, and accordingly are r~rded as capi al contributtons for fi nancia l statement purposes. For budge ary purposes , sud1 fees are considered revenues. Reserves ~rves represent those portions of fund balance not available for appropriation for future expenditure or wh ich are legally segregated for a speci fie future use. 'Ihe pr inciple reserves, other than for encut'brances, in the accanpanying financial statenents are c1s follows: Debt Service Jrnounts reserved were primarily establi shed to ccrrply with legal requirerrents regarding debt service for tax tncrement bond anticipat ion notes issued by the WRA . Internal Service 1be reserve for "Stop Loss " was est<"~blished to cover the dt (ferential between the total of projected incorre for the year and the "S op Loss" attachment point. 'Iha "S op Loss" attadment point is the pomt at whidl the City ceases to be self-insured for major medtcal and dental claims and such claims becane covered ~hrough an insurance CCII'pany. 'I1'le reserve for long-te-rm disability res ricts contributions o the disability plan based upon an actuarial study by the aaninistrator o! the plan . Enterprise Funds ii1e reserve for Sewer Refunding and Use Tax bonds reth:enent (included in Reserve for Deb t Service) was established to """'ly with legal requirements regarding debt ser vice and security to bondholders for these i ssues. "nle reserve for Bi...Clty construction inchcates the amount of cash restricted in the Sewer Fund to finance future construction at Ule plan (ace also Note )J. Trust funds 'rile reserve for erployees• retirement tndicates the restricted nature of pension plan fund balances . 14 • I • I • • • • ANNUAL FINA NC IAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO Special Assessment Punds Reserve for Debt Service -the reserve for debt service was establishecJ to identify and restrict the p:>rtion of fund balance required for payment of special assessment long-term debt principal maturing 1 0 future years. Proprietary FUnds A 5\.I!'IMry of proprietary fund reserves in the &ccatpranying CCI'ttl i ned balance sheet follows: Internal Service: Stop loss Long-tenn disability Enterprise: OeM service Bi-city joint venture construction Refunded Bonds Retained Earnirwzs $317,281 80,916 398,197 416,108 864.664 1 ,280, 772 $1,678,969 Ttle C1ty and the fl1RA have entered into refundiOCJ transactions whereby refunding tx>nds and tax increrrent boOO anticlpation notes have been issued to facilitate the retiranent of their OOligation with respect to certain issues already outstand ing . 'the proceeds of the refuOO i ng issues have been placed in irrevocable escrow accounts ard invested in U.S. Treasury obligations that, together with interest earned thereon, will provide mounts sufficient for future payment of interest and pr incipal on the issues be ing refunded . Refunded bonds and notes are not included in ou s Anding long-term debt s ince the City and the ttJRA legally satisfied their obligation with respect thereto through COOSl.mnation of the refundi ng transaction described herein. Any ~in or loss on refunc:Jings i s recogn ized in the period in ...tlich the refunding occurs as an extraordinary item (See Note 4 for a sumary of refunded boros ootatanding}. Ca!pensated Absences 8eg1nn1ng 1n 1982 , govermental funds recognize expend itures for accrued vacation carpensation and sick leave earned prior to January 1, 1981 (date of pol icy change) when earned, to the extent that such accrual is material t o the financial statenents and will be liquidated wi t h experdable available financial resources . "nle remainder of arr.t such liab ility is recognized in the general lonq-term debt account group . Proprietary funds recognize the entire liability for vacation pay when earned and deaned material. Sick leave earned since January 1, 1981 does not vest , aOO no liability for sick leave is accrued after that date. Water and Sewer Fund Billi]:;s 'lhe C1ty has no Ul1bll ed receivables f or wa ter o r sewer serv ice. Sewer btllings a re billed in advance of such services, and are recorded as unearned revenue un ti l the service is rendered. Ca!parative Data Catparative data for the prior year has been prese nt ed 1n certain of the accorpanyH'KJ financial statenents to provide an understa nd i ng o f changes in the City's financ i al position and operations . However, canpl ete ~rative data (i.e. presentation of prior year totals by fund type) have not been presented in each of the statements since thei r inclusion would rrake the sta tements unduly ~lex and difficult to read. Certain accounts relating to 1983 ha ve been reclassified t o conform to current year presentation. Total CollltllS on Carbi ned Statanents Total colt.m'lB on the cantilned Statements are captioned Hsnorandtn Only to indicate that they are presented only to facilitate f i nancial analysts . Data in these collml.S do not present f i nancial position, results of operatioNJ, or dlanges in financial position in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Neither is such data ~rable to a consolidation. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of this data. 1 5 • I • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD , CO LORADO (2) Fund Deficits ffie deficits of special assessment funds arise because of the application of generally accepted accounting principles to the financial reporting for such funds. Although liabilities for special assessment bonds payable are accounted for in special assessment funds, bond proceeds used to finance construction of special asses811alt projects are oot recognized as an "other financing source". 5pecial assessments are recognized as revenue only to the extent that individual installments are considered current assets. 'l1le deficits of these funds will be reduced and eliminated as deferred special assessments installments becane current assets . Special assessment funds with deficit balances at llecent>er 31, 1984 are: Paving Districts: -r 22 -r 24 -r 25 -r 26 North -r 26 South -r 27 -r 28 -r 29 !blt>er 30 Downtown Development $ 16,293 $ 7,432 $ 125,479 $ 12 ,166 $ 13,692 $ 58,994 $ 101,565 $ 156 ,009 s 19,803 $ 256,606 'l1le debt service fund regarding the 1983 Camun i ty Center bonds also has a deficit fund balance at Decelrber 31, 1984, i n the amount of $24,323, ...,i ch will be elimi na t ed in 1985 by an operating transfer . (3) Investment in Bi~i~ Joint Venture ffie City partl2pates 1n a joint venture with the City of Littleton, formed for the conatruction and operation of a wostewater treatment facility. Federal and state qranta to the cities provided approximately 55\ and 25\ of conatruction costs, respectively. 'l1le joint venturers provided funds for the remaining costs in equal proportions.. 'ftle cities' share of ~rating expenses, excluding depreciation, is bsaed upon usaqe of the facility (38.4\ for Li ttleton and 61.6\ for l!h:jlewoo:l during 1984)for variable operating expenses, and egually for fixed operating expenses 'l1le City's investment in the joint venture has been reduced by the City's share of the joint venture net operating loss, ...,ich represents SOl of the depreciation of the facility. 16 • I • • • • • ANN UAL FINANC IAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO (4) Long-Term Debt t:Oii9-term debt at Decenber 31 , 1984, is catt>tised of the following issues: Fund Servicing Interest Q.Jtstanding Issued Retired C\ltstanding D.le in ~ ~ Rates JanW!I~ 1, 1984 in 1984 ~ !lecelt>er Jl, 1984 1985 GENERAL OOLIGIITION BONDS Refunding water 1978 Water 6\ $5 ,285,000 545,000 $4,740,000 $245,000 Water 1980 Water 6.6-8.0\ l , 270,000 10,000 1,260,000 250,000 Cumuni ty Center 1983 General 8 .5-11\ 4,600,000 4,600,000 105 ,000 Total general obligation bonds 11,155,000 s 555,000 $10,600,000 $600 ,000 . .., .......... REVDIUE BOII)S Refunding sewer revenue 1976 Sewer 5. 7-6.25\ 816,000 110,000 706 ,000 $125,000 Use tax revenue: Refunding 1983 ... Golf Course 8.5 -10.5\ 465,000 10,000 455,000 15,000 Refund ing 1983 8 Sewer 8.5 -10.5\ 1,860,000 35,000 1,825,000 60,000 Total revenue bonds $3,141,000 $ 155,000 $2,986,000 $200,000 SP!X:IAI. ASSESSMENT Pav ing District t22 Same 6 .25-6.75\ 91,000 45,000 46,000 Paving District 124 Same 5.25\ 21 ,000 8,000 13 ,000 Paving District t25 Same 4.6-5 .3\ 299,000 120 ,000 179,000 Paving District t26 North and South Same 12\ 56,999 20,000 36,999 Paving District t27 Same 7-8\ 120 ,000 40,000 80,000 Paving District f28 Same 7-8\ 472,600 472,600 0 Paving District f29 Same 7.5-8 .875\ 349,100 122,100 227,000 Downtown Irrprovement District No. 1980-l Same 11-11.9\ 398 ,800 398, BOO Tota l special assess- ment bonds $1 ,808,499 s 355,100 $1,453,399 KlRTGAGE INSTAI.UIDrr t«lTE City Hall property General 5.625\ $ 552 ,324 s 28,377 $ 523 ,947 $ 30 ,014 CAPITAI.IZ!D !.EASES (See Note 8) General Various s 699,269 $ 117,143 $ 582 ,126 $118,756 MJl"E PAYABLE BY EIXll., FIXlA (secured by land) General 12\ 29,225 2,888 26,337 $ 26,337 ~~~BON> ANrlCIPATION OOl"ES (El.JRA) Refunding E1JRA series l984C E1JRA 10\ 6,500,000 6, 500,000 E1JRA series 1984!1 E1JRA 10\ 9,990,000 9 ,990,000 E1JRA series 19848 E1JRA 10\ 6 ,500,000 6,500 ,000 $22,990,000 $6 ,500,000 $16,490,000 Neither the EIDA note payable nor the Fl.1'RA tax anticipation notes constitute liabilities to the Ci t y of Eng1ewooJ . I Annual requiranents to emortize long-term debt at Oecettler 31, 198 4 are as follows: Mortgage EllOA El.JRA Tax Year Ending General Special Installment Capitalized Note Ant icipation Oecerber 31 Obligation Revenue Assessment Note ~ Payable ~ ~ 1985 1,412, 790 449,237 136,337 58,720 159,102 29,322 $ 1,649,000 3 ,894 ,508 1986 1,392,040 464,237 193,492 58,720 155,403 1,649,000 3,912,892 • 1987 1,372 ,290 501,328 209,471 58,720 114,684 1,649,000 3 ,905 ,493 1988 1,360,915 537,639 508,727 58,720 114,684 17,177,083 19,757 .768 1989 1 ,352,202 546,981 708,725 58 ,720 13 ,200 2,679 ,828 1990-1994 5,467. 753 1,927,163 344,709 293,600 268,200 8,301,425 "-1995-1999 4,284,625 142,079 4,426, 70 4 200Q-2002 1,658,030 I . 1,658,030 ----------------------------------------------------------------------$18,300,645 $ 4,426,585 $ 2,101,461 729,279 825,273 29,322 $22,124,083 $48,536,648 ··········· ........... ........... ··········· ··········· ........... . ........... 17 • • • • • • ANNUAL FINA NCIAL RE:PORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO 'There ~re a 1'1lmber of limitations and restrictions contained in the various boOO indentures. The City believes it is in <:.."QTpliance with all significant limitations and restrictions. A sumnary of all refunded issues as of Dec::erber 31, 1984 follows: Description of Issue Housing Refunding, 1976 Water lrt1?rovement, 1971 Water Irrprovement, 1978 Sewer Revenue, 1975 Housing , 1976 1981-A (Golf Course) 1981-B (Sewer) 1984 EllRA Tax An ticipation Notes Amount Outstanding 1,835,000 405,000 5,430,000 800,000 1 ,647 ,000 385,000 1,435,000 6,500 ,000 (5) General F ixed As sets A 5\DMry of changes in general fixed assets follows: Balance January 1, 1984 ~ Land 5,084,954 s 5 ,279,262 Balance ~ Ilecetber 31 , 1984 $10 . 364 . 216 Buildings 4,661,316 183,084 4,844,400 ln'provements other than bu ildings fljui~J~~ent 386 ,331 4,018, 755 ---------- $1 4 ,151, 356 = .............. 276,515 511,699 6,408 ----------- $ 6,250,560 6,408 ............ A 8\m'Rary of propr ietary fund type property, plant and equipment follows : Land and water rights Buildings {including construction in process) lnprovanent s other than buildings Less: aCC'\I'Tlllated depreciation (6) Pension Punds Enterprise $ 8,551,610 16,397,402 10,012 ,857 6 ,079,039 41,040,908 6,058 , 760 $34,982 ,148 Internal ~ $ 633 ,672 2,802 ,213 3,435,885 2,092 ,1 76 s 1 ,343, 709 662 ,846 4,524,046 $20 ,395 ,508 (a) ~anization and General Pohcemen 1s and Firemen's Pension Funds wer established by the Clty in accordance with Colorado State law and cover substantially all erployees of each department not covered under the State plan (see below). The C> ty Counci 1 has established separ•te policemen's and firemen 's benefit funds to provid benef1ts for permanent disability in excess of those provided by the statutory fund. Included with the F1remen 's Pension fUnd is a special fund known as the "Vo lunteer Firefighters' Pension Fund" used to provide benefits to 1/Qlunteer firemen. The F>rst llatlonal Bank of Englewoo:l Is trustee for all of these pension funds . Annual contributions to these funds by the arployer and 911'loyee are not less than the normal cost of the s a tutory and bencfi t funds plus the unfunded past service cost of the beneflt funds 5t'l:lrti zed over a 40-year period . Policanen's and Faemen's Pension Funds have been funded in accordance with state statutes. The City of Englewood has a pens ion plon for E!l{>loyees of the City other than policemen, firanen, and elected officials. Ani"'Ulll contributions o the fund are not less than normal cost plus the unfunded past service coat mcrtiEed over a ten year period. The plan io currently funded solely fran city contributions. State law, effective January 1, 1980, created a new retir nt benefit plan for policenen nd firei'N!n hired on or after April 8, 1978; c reated a new death and disability benef it plan for policenen and flnmen, regardlesa of the time they were hired; and created a s ate flre and po lic. pension assoc:Jation to a&nini ster the new 18 • I • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLE WO OD COLORA DO plans and to perfoon certain other functions relating" to policemen's and firemen's pensions. Policemen and firenen hired before April 8, 1978, may voluntarily assc:ciate wi th the new retirB1ent plan uOOer certain ciro.anstances, while those hired after April 8, 1978, are autanatically associated with the new retiranent plan. ftrployees may withdraw fran the retirerrent plan and establish their own alternative plan if certain conditions are rret. 'nle bill established initial BTployer and enployee contribution rates of 8\ which are still in effect, and which are designed to eliminate any unfunded accrued liability over a forty year period carrnencing January 1, 1979. 'Ihe state association will determine further contributions to the plan. The State of Colorado will cont.ribute certain lli'OOUnts to be allocated between the retirement and death and disability plans, and all previous state contribution fornulas are terminated. 'Mlere were no significant plan ~ts durinq 1984. (b) Acam.Jlated Plan Benefits Acam.Jlated plan benefits are those future periodic pa)'lllents, iocluding lll!p-Sllll distrib.ltions, which are attributable under the Plans' provisions to the service mployees hove rendered to the benefit informat i on date. Acam.llated plan benefits include benefits expected to be P3 i d to (i) retired or terminated t!ll'r(Jloyees or their beneficiaries, (ii) beneficiaries of arployees ~ have died, and (iii} present mployees or their benef i ciaries. Benefits under the Non-Dnerqency Eltployee plan are baaed on fi'Ployees' ~nsation during their last 60 consecutive calendar rronths of credited service. 'n1e a<:."C\mllated plan benefits for active E!n'ployees are based on their average ~tion during the 60 consecutive caleroar months ending on the date as of ..tlich the benefit informat i on is presented (January l , 1984). As for the Policemen's and Firemen's plans, both the benefits and the acom.Jlated plan benefits are based on one year of credited service. Benefits peyable under all circunstances - retiranent, death, disability, and tennination of STployment -are included, to the extent they are deene::! attributable to erployee service rendered to the valuation date. A 5\D'Mry of acctmJlated plan benefits and net assets available for benefits as of January 1, 1984 is presented below: Actuarial present value of accurulated plan benefits: Vested $4,450,733 $4,864,622 $2,736,762 Nonvested 176 ,144 Unfurded actuarial accrued liability Net assets available for benefits ---------------------- $4,450 ,733 $4,864,622 $2,912,906 $3,401,214 $2 ,635,571 s 960,428 -········ .•........ -········ $2,355,546 S3, 744,854 $3,842 ,130 ........... ., ........ ·········· The actuarial present value of aCC\.ITl.llated plan benefits is derived fran an actuarial study, and is that amount that results fran applying actuarial ass~.mptions to adjust the accurulated plan benefits to reflect the time value of money (through discounts for interest) a nd the probability of payment (by means of decr.....,.,ts such as for retirement , death, disability, or termination) between the valuation date and the expected date of payment. 'n1e significant actuarial ass~tions used in the valuation as of January 1, 1984 were Ci) life e>q>ectancy of participants (the 1971 Group Annuity Morta lity Table projected to 1975), (h) retirerrent age assl>!Pt i ons, and (iii) investment return. 'Ihe retirement age for non-emergency erployees is age 65, for pollcanen it is age 55 and 20 years of credited service , or 25 years of credited service , ard for firemen it is age 50 and 20 years of credited service . 11le assuned average rates of return were 7\ for the Non-Dnergency El'Tployees Plan, and 7 . 5\ for both the Policemen's and Firemen's plans. (c) Invesbnents Plan 1nvestments are ~rried at the lower of coat or market value at year-end . 19 • I • • n - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWO OD COLORADO Investments at Oec.-erber 31, 1984, are smmnized as follO\IIS: fbployees' Retirement P\1nd U S Goverrmental Securities-Short Term U S Treasury Notes and Coupons Corporate Borljs Pol iC"SMm 'a Pens ion Fund U S Goverrwnental Securities-Short Term U S Treasury Notes Corporate Bonds Pi rtnen • s Pension P\md U S Gover mental Securities-Short Term U s Treasury Notes Corporate Bonds (d) Plan contributions Market ~ Excess of Cost ~ Over Market $1,593,400 $1 ,593,400 $ 2,681,809 2,693,409 11 ,600 225, 853 246,055 20,202 $4,501,062 $4,532,864 $ 31,802 ·········· ................... . s 655,000 s 655,000 s 1,858,303 1,864,593 6,290 146,390 160,032 13,642 $2,659,693 $2,679,625 s 19,932 .................... -········· $1,446,000 $1,446,000 $ 2,565,686 2,577,286 11,600 225,853 246,056 20,203 $4 ,237,539 $4,269,342 s 31,803 .......... ·········-· -········ COOtritiltions by the City to each of the plans for the year ended Orec.wtber 31, 1984 are as follows: ~ Percent of Payroll &lployees' Retirement Fund s 396,674 7\ Policanen 'a Pension Fund $ 252,251 20.88\ Firemen's Pension Fund $ 348,072 28.125\ The C.ity also contributed $123,878 to the State plan for p:>licemen ard firenen in 1984. All contribJtiona were made either during 1984 or within 30 days after year-end. Fire and p:~lice .ployees contribute 5\ of payroll to their respective pension funds. The contribJtion rates to each of the City pension plans are not expected to change aignificantly in the foreeeeable future. C,perating revenues Depreciation and ~rthation ~rating lncane (loss) ~rating transfers: In OUt t~t incane (loss) OJnent c apital contributions Goverrrnenta Systtrn developtent fees Plant, property, and equi~t:: Add itions Deletions Net working capital Tctaluaeta Bonds and other lOf"':J-tem liabilitin, Payable ftcm operating revenues (inclucUnq cunent p:lttion) Total oqui ty ~ s 2,947,015 326,971 959,742 s 1,279,000 609,900 161,591 662,237 ------- 100,198 -------- 482,782 $23, 987, 329 $ 6,048, 790 $17,775,636 20 ~ $ 3,693,260 --------- 48 3 ,560 -------- 702,295 ---------- ---------- s 1 ,223,894 ---------- s 928,406 s 1,696 ,341 ---------- 949,094 -------- --------s 6,348,423 -------- $27,756, 566 --------- $ 2,531,000 ------- 524,068,609 ------ • 1984 Is .. ~ Olterpr i se ~ 474,062 s 7,1H,3l7 ---------------------70 ,963 881 ,494 ------·----- (677) s 1,661, 360 -------------------- s 1,279,000 --------------------- (18,080) s 1 ,8 15 , 71 4 ----------- s 928 ,406 s 1,857,932 ---------- 69,498 s 1,680,829 ------------------- 100,198 --------- 162,414 $ 6,993,619 ----------------$ 5,646,028 $57,389,923 ----------------- 455,000 $ 9,034, 790 -------------$ 5,180,802 $47,025,047 --------- ll I • I I - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOO D , CO LORADO (81 Lease ea..! '-nta Lease camtlt:ments include parcela of land currently ~Jed by the Polioe-Pire Center (capital lease) and the Servicenter (operating leaae) and a capital leue for ~ter equipnent. "nle City pays $1 ,100 per month uncSer the capital land leue, Wlich expires in Mardl, 2005. However, the City haa an option to p.Jrchue thb land in 111!1rch, 1990, for approxilletely $266,000 ($2 .50 per 8q!Jare foot). Becau. of the Pl'obability that the City will exerciee ita option, the leaae haa been capitali~ in the aoc:::a~~panying <:'Cid>!nod balance .._t. 1be following iJ a IK'hedule by yean of future mi niaua leue ~ta IDler capt tA 1 leaaea and the preHnt value of the net miniran lease peynena • of lleclllber 31, 1984: Calplter !!!!! ~ ~ lear ending llec:entler 31: 1985 13,200 145,902 159,102 1986 13,200 142,203 155,403 1987 13,200 101,484 114,684 1988 13,200 101,484 114,684 1989 13,200 13,200 Later Y .. n 261,200 286,200 Total ainU.. lease pa)'lftltnta 334,200 Ul,073 825,273 Leu: ..ount reprnenting interest 163,671 79,470 243,147 Pr-.nt value of net minim.n 1-. ~ywenta $ 170,523 $ 411,603 $ 582, l26 rr-rt: wlue of net minintlft 1 .. p.y.nu clle in 1985 7,451 $ 111,305 S ll8, 756 ,_ ServJoenter 1 .... gives the City the option to purchue the pr•i._ urder the ._ tem. u offered by any other purch .. er. The 1 .... expir .. on f'tlrch Jl , 2004, but ia ~le for • further term of JS yeara W'der the current te~. A ...... ry of 1 .... ~t8 follow: Y .. r .n:ting ~r31 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 ~tyee.n 2 1 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 85,500 S ll5, 500 • I • • ;In - • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO (9) Inter-fund Tnnaectiona l'Und tra,.fero during flocal 1984 lnc:ludll the following: .....::=1•1 -.,. £!el tol Pro1«:U lileehl Dlter:prlM lllM Debt ~ Sherin; ~ Lottery !!! ~ Oonatructlon ~ ~ Activity- Op.nting Tr.rwter• In (~t): ' -· Glneral PUrd to PU' (575,000) 575,000 Cill'leral P\n! to IUIA (157,300) 157,300 Clonerol Pin! to -cial oon~truction (1,000,000) 1,000,000 --ohoring to O.Wral Pund 577,600 (577,600) PIP to -•1 Pin! 16,5~5 (16,5~5) PIP to a:JIIA -P<O:)eote ~~.179,470) 2,179,470 PIP to lla 111,199 (111 ,199) Lottety to PIP (87,431) 87 ,431 Lottety to-eervice (80,000) 80,000 --to ~iol oanotructian 1,279,000 (1,~79,000) 1(1,131,175) 1(577,600) 1111,899 $(167,431) 1(1,645,463) f2,336,770 f2,279,000 $ 80,000 $(1 ,~79,000) Clae To Clae PrCIII --of"Yuno! Poll---..-..n.ion Pin! -•1 l'Und lllpl-...,.!on Pin! CllnKal P\h! Pi~'• Pwwion P\n! -•1 Pin! P\lbllc lllpr-t Pin! l'llbllc~-- -Pin! lllRA Project Pin! l'llblic~-- _,t Pin! Clancrete Ropac...,t Pin! (10)00nti!!Q!nt LlllbllltiM Mount $5;"n6 10,092 5,535 17,301 80,000 18,078 $136,472 A -r of clot.. ere P<-.tly l*lding _!,.t the City, but City -t belt.,. that tt .. l Mttl~t of ttwee •ttera will not •tert.Uy affect the flnMClol ete-..o of the City. h City nc.tv. ~ frc. ... .rtou. federal ...., etate grant ~ogr-, 111hich are oubject to fl,.l rwl., on! -ovo1 M to oll-lllty by the ~lve grontor -~-. 22 • ~ [I l I • lo _____ ~ L I l I_ I I I I • • • • C) ,., z ,., ::11 ,.. ,... .... c z 0 I . • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI T Y OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I . • 23 • • Jn n - • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLO RADO s:HIDULE OF REVEilUES , EXI'ENDI'ruRES, AN> D1::tK11wcES AND OW«;ES IN FUt.ll BALAN:E BUDGET AND AC'IUAL (I«:JN-GMP BASIS ) YEAR l'2iDfD OEX:!JoeER 31 , 1984 REVDiUES: TAXES Propert y tax 5peci flc -.ershl p tax Sales and use tax Ci garette tax util i t i es lloin i ss i ons Hotel/Hot el Total taxes LICDISI!!'.S AN> PERHITS Business licenses and permits Building licenses and permits Total licenses and permits III'I'EAOOVERM!EAL REVENUE l"ederal grants State llhare:l revenue Total intergoverm.ental OiMGI!!'.S I!OR SERVICES Genera l goverrment Public 11afety Hig'-y and street An i ma l she! ter Debris raooval Recreati on program Li brary Bi -<:ity l!dn i n i s tration Total d>a rges f or services FINES AN> FORFE ITURES Court fi nes Library fines &\RNIN:;S ON DEPOSITS II I~ REIIENJE Total revenues 011!ER FIIWCI N:; SOURCES -TRANSFERS IN Total r """"""s a nd o ther financing sources 24 Es timate:! Revenues (As Rev i sed) Actual Aeve~ $ 916,455 $ 910 ,229 70 ,000 112,068 10 ,605,000 11,381,353 650 ,000 703,302 1 ,126,950 1,090,298 37,000 4,111 ----------------·--13 ,405,405 14,201 ,361 ----------------- 131 ,000 127,500 145,000 254,868 -----------------276,000 382 ,368 -------------------- 83,151 575,000 661,319 ---------------·----658,151 661,319 --------------- 430,800 42 1 ,670 6 ,000 9,697 53 ,968 54,641 40 ,400 45 ,94 5 1 ,500 1 , 551 233 ,066 250 ,640 36 ,500 46,054 115,200 91,063 -------------------917 ,434 921,261 -------------------- 281 ,500 244 ,753 15 ,000 12 ,278 -------------------- 296,500 257 ,031 --------------------- 159 ,000 340 ,865 -------------------- 87 ,897 141 ,280 -------------------15,800,387 16 ,905 ,485 ---------------------616 ,525 59 4,125 --------------------16 ,416 ,912 17 ,499 ,610 -------------------- • Var i a nce Fa vora ble (Unfavorable) $ (6,226) 42,068 77 6,353 53 ,302 (36,652) (37 ,000 ) 4,111 -------- 795,956 --------- (3 ,500) 109,868 ---------- 106,368 --------- (8 3 ,151) 86,319 --------- 3 ,168 -------- (9,130) 3 ,697 673 5 ,54 5 51 17 ,574 9 ,55 4 (24 ,137) ----------- 3 ,827 ---------- (36 , 747) (2, 722) ----------- (39 ,469) ---------- 181,865 ---------- 53,383 ----------- 1,105, 098 ----------- (22,400) ----------- 1 ,082 ,698 ----------- I • II • • • • A 'NUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO BliXZT AfC JC'!UAL (~ MSlS) YEAR OC>r:D CIJ::DieER Jl, 1984 Ceonttf'IJild) Actual ~t tu:r .. -..... (~I~ !XPDC>JruRES Me Da.tiNWC!:S: li.CISLATIVE Ate CD.16!L ct ty Oounc:J 1 s 138,276 s 129,470 llollrd of Mj ~ta .00 AppNl8 7 ,053 7 ,043 Board of Car•r Strvi c. 17,020 ),409 Plaming ..S Zont,_., ec-iQJon 12,396 12,415 Libruy ao.rd 2,0) 2,100 Ci ty AttOf"MY 2)2,502 245,168 ax.tot.l legialni w ard ~1 t09, 740 :!99,605 ADtiNIS'ntATION City ,..,...r 228,162 237,737 Blployee rebtlcxw 250,843 245,494 Tt"euury ..S record 151,174 143,629 Accounting and eu.!it:ing 202,134 178,290 -298,542 286 ,650 I'IJl:<:IIU !nq 255,616 256,918 Dllta pr-oceulng 287,488 J25,24l 9Jbtotal a&ainhtratJon 1,673,959 1,671,959 fiUfiCIPN. CXXJRT 218,047 216,783 CDOUIITY llEV!LOftiDn' Cr:.t.Wor~t 237 ,929 216,242 lb.a8 1ng ard ~los-nt 116,769 107,504 Plalming 306,014 285,341 aabtot..l ~tty deovelq:.ont 720,712 609,087 Total C)e~Wnl gover~t ),092,458 2,959,4).4 Jl\a.IC ICJaS A&ftinletratlon 84,753 90,430 PrCIJf• coord i n~tion and .rlC)i rwet:irq 316,426 315 ,175 Bt.r•ts ~ dtai n.ge 1,275,572 1,250 ,165 '!'raffle raqulat ion. 402,156 42 5,196 C..nl cp..rn ion~ and •i nten~~nce 735,712 718,929 Slln i oc a.rr;ey 32,481 34,021 T'bta l publ Jc works 2,847 ,100 2,834,506 IUitS Ml) ltii::Rr.ATJCif Plu:ks 1,125,592 1,136,642 a.c:r: .. uon 1, 115 ,736 1,014, 770 A.lbt:ota l perka and rtlc:Tution 2,241,321 2,151,4 12 LIUAIIY 588,309 588,309 T'otel culture and r KTHtion 2,829,617 2, 739 ,721 POLICE DEPM"ntDrr' Polic. pltrol 2,352, 788 2,235,293 Pol tee a&al nlstration 411,2)) 461,342 a-..ant eatiON 538,818 554 ,2)7 AniNI 8hel ter 130,641 140,250 ltTYMtil}lltiON 64 7 ,158 692,431 <bn..lni ty relatiorw 54,952 48,619 SUbtotal pollc. depertaent 4,14 1,660 4 ,1J2,178 FlU DrPA1mtDrr rire .tluni•tntion 150,549 148,425 rt re aJCII)CHa lon 2,113,247 2 ,234,209 Pire r.acue 495,1!158 41!13 ,416 Yolunt.n 14,465 12,595 Prewntion 180,255 176,118 1'ralnh'19 164 ,597 U 4,208 ~l f l redlllplr~t 3,111,971 3,188,971 ,_.1 p.lbl ic N!ety 7,ll0,6ll 7,321,149 'l'otal fti*wUtur• 16,099,121 15,154,110 ........... ovu furdac) ewprtnditur• 317 ,086 1,644,100 O!'HEI FI*'CI NG UII'.S • ,.._.. lO ontD rutllS u. 1J2,l00) {1, 1)2,300) atYDI.ta CND (tAla) IDDC)ITUIII:S MD onta U118 (1,41 5,214) 117,SOO) P\110 MLANCZ -JN1.UY 1 1,299,971 1,610,797 V.riano. Favorable (~favorable) 8,806 10 13,611 (19) )9J (12,666) 10,135 (9,575) 5,349 7,545 2J,8U 11,892 (1,302) (37, 753) 11 ,264 21,611 69,265 20,673 111,625 1JJ,024 (5,677) 651 25 ,407 {23 ,030) 16 ,783 (1,540 ) 12 ,594 (11 ,050} 100,966 89 ,916 89,916 lL7 ,495 (U,l09) (15,)49) (9,609) (45,279) 6,3)] 9 ,482 2,124 150,962) 12,44 2 1,170 4 ,1)7 30 ,389 9,41 2 245,016 1,327,114 1,)27, 7 14 )10,119 f'LIC)MLNCE-~11 f (1U,2l6) 11,591,297 • 1,701,533 25 • 0 I • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • I • • 26 II • • I n - • I f I ~ I J I f L [ [ l L [ I [ I I • • • • 0 C/l , , 0 ;; r ::u I , • < , z c , .., c z 0 C/l • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I • • 27 • • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO SPOCIAL REVENUE FUNll'l C01BINING BALAN:E SHEET DB:EMBER 31, 1984 WITH Ol1PARATIVE 'roTALS FOR YEAR ENDED DB:EMBER 31, 1983 ASSETS Central cash and 1nvestments Other investments Due fran other governments Property taxes receivable less uncollectibles Loans receivable other current assets Total assets LIABILITIES Accounts payable Deferred property tax revenue Total liabilities Fund balance: Reserved for E!OC\mlbrances lklreserved Total fund equity 28 Revenue Sharing s 63,710 144,089 ------- $20 7 ,799 =====•== ------- ------ 207,799 ----- 207,799 ------ $207,799 ==:===== • Camrunity State Developnent Lottery Block Grant $172,971 s 75,691 7,500 81,907 -------------$172,971 $165,098 ===·===== ======== --------------ll --------·---- 172,971 165,098 ------- 172,971 165,098 -------s 172,971 $165,098 ==:z====== ======== I l I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO EURA 1984 1983 EOOI'. General Total Total $134,969 $ 890,343 $ 1,261,993 $ 641,939 75,691 145,434 1,052 29 152,670 165,021 139,045 291,696 430,741 202,185 81,907 1,173 676 676 653 --------------------------------·-$275,742 1,182,068 2,003,678 $1,156,405 -=======· =a-===•==:a::= =========== ========== 939 7,960 8,899 1,902 139,045 291,696 430,741 202,185 -------------------------------------139,984 299,656 439,640 204,087 ------------------------------------- 921 921 47 135,758 881,491 1,563,117 952,271 -----------------·---·------135,758 882,412 1,564,038 952,318 -----------------------------$275,742 $ 1,182,068 $ 2,003,678 $1,156,405 c:aa::a•:a c-•••=••::z•= :a::::z:::::::a::::: ========== I • • 29 • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO SPOCIAL REVENUE FUNDS cn1BINING SI'ATF.MENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND mANGES IN FUND BALAtCE YEAR rnDED DOCEMBER 31, 1984 WITH CD1PARATIVE TOTALS FOR YEAR ENDED DOCEMBER 31, 1983 REVENUES Taxes Intergovernmental revenue Fines and forfeitures Earnings on investments Miscellaneous Total revenues EXPENDITURES General government Capital outlay Debt Service: Principal Interest Miscellaneous Total expenditures Revenues over (under ) expend itures other financing sources (uses ) - operating transfers i n operating trans fe rs out Bond proceeds Revenues over (under) expenditures and other sources (uses) FUND BALAOCE -JANUARY 1 D;)UITY TRANSFERS -Source (Uses) FUND BALAOCE -DOCEMBER 31 30 $ Revenue Sharing 613,567 11,357 624,924 1,000 1,000 623,924 (577 ,600) 46 ,324 161,475 $ 207,799 ===::.::====z • $ State Lottery 163,657 9,516 173,173 173,173 (1 67 ,431 ) 5,742 167 ,229 $ 172 ,971 =••:z••=• $ Carmun i ty Devel()(:ment Block Grant 10,991 10,991 10,991 10 ,991 154,107 $ 165,098 ll r 1 I • • • • • ANNUAL FINA NCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOO D , COLORADO EURA 1984 1983 ~ ~ ~ Total $ 135,460 $ 76,535 $ 211,995 $ 200,163 777 ,224 918,006 1,308 353 1,661 228 10,009 116,650 158,523 59 ,435 1,010 1,010 2,667 ----------------------------------146,777 194,548 1,150,413 1,180,499 ---·----------------------------- 94,896 146,400 241,296 142,064 7,048 7,048 568,320 2,917 2,917 2,589 3,300 3,300 3,668 1,000 600 -----------------------------------101,113 153,448 255,561 717,241 ----------------------------------- 45,664 41,100 894,852 463,258 111,899 111,899 (745 ,031) (595,291) 350,000 350 ,000 ----·-------------------------------- 45,664 502,999 611,720 (132,033) 90,094 379,413 952,318 249 ,351 835,000 -----------------------------------$ 135,758 $ 882,412 1,564,038 $ 952,318 ========= ==:a::ccc: ~========= ========= I • • 31 • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO SP!CIAL REV!HJE PUOS CDeiNINC s::tm:IULE CF REY!XJE.S , EXPDIU'MU:S Nil 0WC:ZS IN rtN> !WNCE 8UXZT At«> ACTt.IAL I ~ MSIS) YEAR Dl>rD DrJ:::!Je!JI ll, 1984 lllil'verue Shllr1!:5J P\lnd SUte Lott!!l ea....,t ~ DIYel!:!J!.!!!t Block Grant Variance Vir I~ van&~ .._, ravorabl• .._, ruorable .._, Favorable I~) ~ C~f•vorablel 1~1 ~ ~ta'lfavor4iblel (~) ~ ftktfavorablel IIEII!>ms .,.., .. • Interqoyernnentel r~ 575,000 611,567 Jl,567 120 ,000 16),657 43,657 Pine. and fotfeJtur• ~rn t nga an ~iu 5,000 U,JS7 fi,l57 9,516 9,516 10,991 10,99 1 Othot Tot..al r.-...ruM 510,000 624,t24 .. ,924 no,ooo 17),11) 53,173 10,991 10,991 ....,.,,.,... Gllntral 9C)Ver,_,t o.bt Service: 2,400 1,000 1,400 Pri ncipal Int.ltr•t C.pl tal out by Total expend I turn 2,400 1,000 1,400 ~o....r (under) 517,600 6ll,924 46,)24 120,000 111,173 53,11) 10,991 10 ,991 ·~t tut .. OU.r fin.nclngo .:JUre. (-.-.) - operating tr.,..f•r• In opuaUng tra~f•n out 1517,600) (577,600) (U 7,4Jl) (167,Ul) ......... .._ ...,....._ ov.r (under) •III*W!IItur• 46,324 "6 ,324 ff1,Ul) 5,742 53,17] 10 ,991 10 ,991 t am ott.r eourc. (u..) ftM) M.r.AII:Z ~ JMlJUY 1 llO, 196 161 ,475 31,279 167,229 167,229 154,107 1S4 ,107 P\.11) BAL.AIC! -~ ll $ l.J0 ,196 $ 207,?99 • 77,60) • 119,191 • 172,971 • 51,171 s 165,098 S 16S,098 I • • 32 • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENG LE WOOD , COLORADO ,., .. ~ General Purd 1'0t.o1 Vutance V..dar'IIC» Variance ....,., hvorable -· hvorable -· hvorabla (Aa ~1Md) ~ {tk\f.vorablel (.\8 Rwi-.:t) ~ {~t.vorablel (At~ "-'ti-.1) ~ (lklfavorabl!l_ $ 131,879 s 13~,460 ),511 • 10,820 $ 76,535 • (4,2t!i} • 212,699 $ 211,995 (704) 695,000 n1,22c 12,224 100 l,)Ofl 1.,201 353 353 100 1,661 1,561 2,270 10,009 7,7)9 1,500 116,650 101,150 15,770 Ut,52) 142, 75) 1,010 1,010 1,010 1,010 134,249 146,777 L2,528 19,320 194,S48 105,221 12.1,569 l,l50,4 U 226,8U 127,349 14,149 32,500 197,914 146,400 51,5)4 l27,61l 242,249 85,434 2,600 2,917 (317) 2,600 2,917 ()17) •• 300 l,lOO 1,000 .,lOO ),)00 1,000 7,969 (7,969) '·'" (7 ,969) 134,249 101,066 JJ,liiJ 197,934 U4,l69 4),565 ))4,51) 256,4)5 11,148 45,711 45,711 (101,614) 40,179 141,79) SII,M6 193,978 l04,t92 111 ,899 111,899 111 ,199 111,899 )50,000 350,000 (745,0)1) (745,0)1) )50,000 350 ,000 U,7U 45 ,711 151 ,285 502,078 148,19) l05,8S4 610,846 304,992 90,047 90,047 )79,413 l79,4l) 297,US 9S2,271 65-4,846 • 135,758 $ ll5, 758 $ 3Sl,285 • 881,491 S S28,2t)6 s 603,279 41,56),117 s 959,831 I 3 3 • • ~n • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL. REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I • • 34 • • - I I [ I I . [ [ [ [ L L [ • I I I • • • • • 0 rr1 CD -i (/) rr1 :0 < () rr1 ...., c z 0 I . • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPOR T CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO DmT SERVICE EU!VS CIHIINING I!AL.'.K:E SHE!:!' ll!X:D1BER 31, 1984 ~ Central cash and $ (25 , 278) inveatmenta Restricted cash: Bond reserve account Bond debt aervice account Total restri cted cash Total cash Miscellaneous receivables (25, 278 ) 955 $ (24,323 ) ~ 1, 716 ,656 2,681, 357 ------- 4,398,013 ------ 4,398,013 ------ $ 4,398,013 ···•······ ~ $ (25, 278) 1, 716,656 2,681, 357 ----- 4, 398,013 -------- 4,372, 735 955 ---- $ 4,373,690 ---········ -rved for debt service $ (24,323) $ 4,398,013 S 4,373,690 Note -There were no debt service funds prior to 1984 . 35 • I • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO DI2T S!JMCE nK6 crJ'IDJNir«;; STAT!HDn' OF' REV!Nt.fES, EXPEfriH'!UlES AN> QW«ZS TN P'tJrl> BAIAICES Y!AR EHlED DfC!J1BER 31, 1984 Olnun ity C.Oter ~ ~ ~ ~ Property taxu $ 399,6)1 $ 399,63l tat"nings on deposits 15,843 212,946 228,789 415,474 212,946 628,420 EXPDI>l tuu:s lnt.ernt 514,600 761,933 1 ,276,533 Other 5,197 5,197 519,797 761,9)) 1, 281,730 Experditur•s in excess of revenues (104,323) (5 48,987) (653,310) O'mER PitWC'It«; SCXR:&s: Bond pr~ 4,947,000 4,947,000 'l"ranafere in 80,000 80,000 Pund balance (deficit) $ (2 4,321) $4,398,0ll $4,373,690 • I • • 36 • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF E NG LE WOOD COLO RADO Df.3T SERVICE PlNJS CXMBINING STAT91ENr at REVEMJES, !XPDI>l~ES .tH> CHANGES IN P'tN) BALMCE -BLIXZT Afrl) ~L YEAR EM>ED Df!C!MBDt 31, 1984 c::am..a,tt~ Center Bonds ....... Total vanance V.nance Variance l'avorable l"'lvor&ble Favorable ~ !21!! ~ lll'lfavor&ble) ~ ~ (lbfavorable} !21!! ~ (llnfavocable) Property ta.x .. s 398,291 $ 399,631 1,340 s 398,291 s 399,631 1,340 Earnlnga on dep)1 J te 32,807 15,843 (16,964) 212,946 212,946 32,807 228,789 195,982 43l,098 US,474 (15,624) 212,946 212,~6 431,098 628,420 197,322 !XP£tG> I TlllES Int.er"t 514,599 514,600 (1) 761 ,933 761,9Jl 1,276,532 1 ,276,533 (1 ) Other 5,200 5,197 3 5,200 5,197 3 519,799 519,797 761,933 761,933 1, 281,732 1,281,130 ontER PI taN: I II: S1.X1CES Bond pr"'--a 4,94 7,000 4,947,000 4,947,000 4,947,000 Tranafeu 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 P'und balance (deficit) (8, 701) s (24 ,323) s (15,622) $4,185,067 $4,398,0ll s 212,946 $4,176,366 $4,373,690 $ 197,324 • I • • 37 • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI T Y OF ENG LEWOOD . COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I • • 38 • • - I r I • • • • I . • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK f • I • • 39 • • -·~-lo ___ _ - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO ASSETS Central cash and investments CAPITAL PROJ&:TS FUNOO aMBINING BAIAICE SHEET Dfx::EMBER 31, 1984 WITH CDIPARATIVE TOTALS FOR YEAR ENDED DEOMBER 31, 1983 Public ImprovEment FUnd EURA Project ~ City Construction FUnd $ 2,196,855 $ 7,689,873 $ 2,269,000 rue from other governments 354,043 33,975 1'1iscellaneous receivables 48,715 rue from other funds 98,078 ----------------------------Total assets $ 2,648,976 $ 7, 772,563 $ 2,269,000 :s:========z =====:=== ===-::•====== LIABILITIES Accounts payable $ 224,319 $ 336,512 $ Due to other governments 30,252 Due to other funds 17,301 80,000 --·------------------------Total liabilities 241,620 446,764 ------------------------ FIN) fXXJITY FUnd balance: Reserved for enc:unbrances 783,279 l , 271,897 lklreserved 1,624,077 6,053,902 2,269,000 --------------------- Total fund balance 2,407,356 7,325,799 2,269,000 ------------------------- Total fund equity 2,407,356 7,325 ,799 2,269,000 --------------------------- $ 2,648,976 $ 7 ,772 ,563 $ 2,269,000 •-=•••za•a• :s:::u:z::a:a::a: ·····•••:a• 4 0 • 1984 ~ $12,155,728 388,018 48,715 98,078 -----·----$12 ,690,539 ===s=:===::.a $ 560,831 30 ,252 97,301 ----------688,384 --------- 2,055,176 9,946,979 --------- 12,002,155 ---------- 12,002,155 ---------- $12,690,539 ·····=•::.:=• 1983 ~ $ 5, 777,257 847,070 ----------$ 6,624,327 ::::::z=====•= $ 136,414 ------·---- 136,414 ---------- 4,093,260 2,394,653 --------- 6,487,913 ---------- 6,487,913 ---------- s 6,624,327 as•==-•,.••= fl J ! I j I • • ll r 1 II ~ - • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT • • • CITY OF ENGLEWO OD . COLORADO CAPITAL PR0J fX:TS l'UII>S CXH3INING SI'ATIMENT Cf' REV!KJES, EXP!H>InJRES A!V O!ANGES IN FtlNl BALA1CE YFAR mom DI!OM!ER 31, 1984 WI'ni CX»1PARATIVE TOTALS FOR YFAR !HliD DfX:!MIER 31, 1983 REVENUES Taxes Intergoverrmental revenue Earn i ngs on investments Miscellaneous Total revenues EXPfX>ITURES Current: General government Public safety Public works Culture and recreation Construction Cap! tal outlay Bond issue costs Revenues over (under) expend i ture Other financing sources used: Operating transfers in Operating transfers out Proceeds of general obligation bonds Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other uses Fund balance -January 1 Fund balance -llecenber 31 Public Inprovemen t Fund $ 1,191,942 578,073 311,038 154,659 ----------2,235,712 3,216,031 16,408 486,147 89,021 863,199 ----------4,670,806 ----------(2, 435,094) 662,431 (2,307,894) ----·----- (4,080,557) 6 ,487 ,913 ---------$ 2 ,407 ,356 ••••••••sa $ &IRA Project ~ 560,290 187,499 ---------747,789 6,437,210 514,550 ---------6,951,760 -------- (1,203,971) 2,336,770 11,193,000 -------- 7,325,799 --------- $ 7,325 ,799 --······· 41 st>ecia1 Construction 1'\mds $ -------- 10,000 ------- 10,000 ----·---- (10,000) 2,279,000 -------- 2,269,000 ---------$ 2,269,000 asa aasa:aaa $ 1984 Total 1,191,942 578,073 871,328 342,158 -------- 2,983,501 3,216,031 16,408 486,147 89,201 863,199 6,447,210 514,550 -------- 11,632,566 -------- (8,649,065) 5,278,201 (2,307,894) 11,193,000 --------- 5,514,24 2 6,487,913 ---------- $12,002,155 ····••:c••• $ 19 83 To tal 892,142 1,312,657 259,153 23,175 -------- 2,487,127 1,225,476 2,403 491,111 85,451 1,604,800 -------·--409,241 ---------(922,114) 620,000 (835, 000) 4,600,000 --------- 3,462,886 3,025,027 ----------$ 6,48 7,913 ••••a•a=:r= • I . • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO CAPITAL PROJI!X:TS FUt«lS <D1B IN ING &l!EilULE OF REVENuEs, EXPEII>ITURES AID ClfANGES IN F'U!I> Bo\LAICE IIUDGET AID ACruAL (fllN-GMP BASIS) YEAR EII>ED DEX»!BER 31, 1984 PUBLIC IMPRO\I!)!Dfi' !lJRA PROJI!X:TS Variance Var1ance Budget Favorable a>dget Favorable (as revised) ~ (Unfavorable) (as revised) ~ (Unfavorable) ~ Taxes $ 725,000 $ 1,191,942 $ 466,942 $ $ $ Intergovernnental revenue 439,152 578,073 138,921 Earnings on investments 240,000 311,038 71,038 100,000 560,290 460,290 Miscellaneous 154,659 154,659 1,093,080 187,499 (905, 581) --------------------------------------1,404,152 2,235, 712 831,560 1,193,080 747' 789 (445, 291) ---------------------------------------E~nditures General goverl"ll'l!nt 864,165 605,952 258,213 Public safety 34,715 760 33,955 Public works 721,365 514,135 207,230 Culture and recreation 238,345 105,632 132,713 Construction 365,218 134,347 230,871 Cap! tal outlay 17,870,865 7, 709,107 10,161,758 Bond issue costs 514,550 (514,550) ------·--------------------------------·-----------------2,223,808 1,360,826 862,982 17 ,870,865 8,223,657 9,647,208 ----------------------------------·--------------Revenues over (unler) expend! tures (819,656) 874,886 1,694,542 (16,677, 785) (7 ,475,868) 9,201,917 Other financing soorces (uses): ~rating transfers in 575,000 662,431 87,431 3,321, 700 2,336, 770 (984,930) ~rating transfers out (2,387,894) (2,307,894) 80,000 Proceeds of general obligation bonds 13,356,085 11,193,000 (2, 16 3 ,085 ) ---------------------------------------------------Revenues over (unler) expend! tures and other sources (uses) (2,632,550) (770,577) 1,861,973 6,053,902 6 ,053,902 Pund balance -Ja..,..ry 1 423,872 2,394,654 1,970, 782 ----------------------------------------------------Pund balance -Deol!ni>er 31 $(2,208,678) $ 1,624,077 $ 3,832,755 $ $ 6,053,902 s 6 ,053 ,902 ·········· ..... ,..z ..... ·········· ·······=..,· c=aaa:&ca:za •::::aaz:o:z 11::: 42 II • • • I . I ; • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOO D , COLORADO SPJ:X:IAL OJNS'I'RUCTION TOTAL Var 1ance Var1ance Budget Favorable Budget Favorable (as revised) ~ (Unfavorable) (as revised) ~ (Unfavorable) $ $ $ s 725,000 s 1,191,942 s 466,942 439,152 578,073 138,921 340,000 871,328 531,328 1,093,080 342,158 (750,922) ------------------------------------------2,597,232 2,983,501 386 ,269 ---------------------------------------- 864,165 605,952 258,213 34,715 760 33,955 721,365 514,135 20 7 ,230 238,345 105,632 132,713 365,218 134,347 230,871 10,000 10,000 17,880,865 7, 719,107 10,161,758 514,550 (514,550) -----------------------------------------------• 10,000 10,000 20,104,673 9,594,483 10,510,190 ------------------·------------------------- (10,000) (10,000) (17,507,441) (6,610,982) 10,896,459 2,279,000 2,279,000 6,175, 700 5,278,201 (897 ,499) (2,387,894) (2,307,894) 80,000 13,356,085 11,193,000 (2 ,163 ,085) ------------------------------------------ 2,269,000 2,269,000 (363,550) 7 ,552,325 7,915,875 423,872 2,394,654 1,970, 782 --------------------------------------------$ 2,269,000 s 2,269,000 s s 60,322 $ 9,946,979 s 9,886,657 --······· ·····•··••· ·•········ ·==··"'···· ........... ······=·==- • I • • 43 • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK I • • 44 • • • • • • • (/) , IT1 () jj; r )> (/) (/) IT1 (/) ~ IT1 z ~ ..., c z 0 (/) I . . - • I I l I_ • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO ~~~~~~~-------------------------- THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 0 I • 4 5 • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO SPEX: IAL ASSESSHEin' FUNDS CXMliNING BALAN::E SHEET DEX:D1BER 31, 1984 WITH COo1PARATIVE TOTALS FOR DtX:D1BER 31, 1983 ASSETS Central cash and investments (deficiency) Other cash CUrrent assessments receivable Deferred asses.....,ts receivable D.Je fran other governnents Total assets LIABILITIES AM> PUIIl ~ (DEFICIT) $ 13,046 16,661 16,661 --------- $ 46,368 -.za.azcaaa $ 6,465 4,284 8,568 --------- $ 19,317 -••••-=zaa Accounts payable $ $ Matured interest coupons payable Deferred revenues 16,661 8,568 Bon:ls payable 46,000 D.Je to other furds Total liabilities l"Und balance (Deficit) : Reserved for er~C~mbrances Reserved for debt aervice Unreserved --------------- $ 62,661 $ 8 ,568 (16,293) 10,749 PAVIr«:; DISTRICTS $ 2,378 $ 12,112 6 ,000 3,190 41,409 9 ,570 165,637 ----------------- $ 15,138 $ 225,158 ae:aaaazaea ==-.. ·••••••• $ $ 6,000 9,570 165,637 13,000 179,000 -----------------$ 22,570 $ 350,637 ----------------- 7,432) (125,479) $ No. 26 ~ (11,687) 106 2, 762 9,666 --------- $ 847 ···=-=·· .. -=· 106 9,666 3 ,241 --------- $ 13 ,013 ---------- (12,166) flo. 26 ~ $ 16,491 157 3 ,57 5 l7 ,875 --------- 38 ,098 .... =•===::.:== $ 157 17,875 33,758 --------- $ 51' 790 ---------·- (13,692) Total fund balance (de fie! t) ----·------------------------------------------------(16,293) 10,749 ( 7,432) (125,479) (12,166) (13 ,692) -------------------------------------------------- $ 46,368 $ 19,317 $ 15,138 $ 225,158 $ 847 $ 38 ,098 ••••,:.aaaaa •••••••••• •••••••·•-=• •=-••=••••• •••••••••• ••••=aaa:za 46 • I • • • • ,. • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO Sidewalk Surplus or Downtown Concrete Total ~ ~ No. 29 ~ ~ Deficiency Developnent Distr ict ~ 1983 $ 10,724 $ 358,476 $ 50,336 $ (19,033) $ ll,280 $ 77,200 $ 51,489 $ 9,879 $ 589,156 $ 793 ,666 336 32 6,631 4,897 9,946 12,559 20,655 4,237 33,463 8,415 161,156 205 ,741 59,676 100,471 165,238 460 200,777 754 ,599 1 ,024,397 57,242 57,242 ------------------------------------------------------------------------$ 80,682 $ 471 ,506 $ 236,229 $ (19,033) $ 16,009 $ 77,200 $ 342,971 $ 18,294 $1,568,784 $2 ,028 ,701 ........... -···-=····· -········ -·-···· -·······= --···•••:.;: -······· ................ c::.:••=•z-=== $ $ 50 $ $ $ 6,050 $ 34,845 263 157 59 ,676 100,471 165,238 460 200,777 754 ,599 1 ,0 24,39 7 80,000 472,600 227,000 398,800 1,453,399 1 ,808 ,4 99 18,078 18,078 ------------------------------------------------------------------139,676 573,071 392,238 50 460 599,577 18,078 2,232,389 2 ,867,898 ----------------------------------------------------------------- (58 , 994 ) (101 ,565 ) (156 ,009) (19,083) (256 ,606 ) 216 (767 ,103 ) (928 ,4 52 ) 1 5,549 77,200 103 ,498 89,255 -------------------------------------------------------------------(58,994) (101,565) (156 ,009 ) (19,083) 15,549 77,200 (256,606) 216 (663 ,605 ) (839 ,197 ) ------------------------------------------------------------------$ 80,682 $ 471,506 $ 236,229 $ (19,033) $ 16,009 $ 77,200 $ 342,971 18.294 1 ,568,78 4 $2 ,028 ,701 .•........ -·······--········ -····=-=-=·· ••••s::s•••• ••a=-=-•z=::z =••=:a:===== ==z'l'::z•==== I • • 4 7 • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO IPEI.U. .UIUSMIII'!' rut01 c."CIIal.I.C IYA,_,-CW ..v.ua, u..mx1\M.a uo cauas n. rum ~ T&U. aom ~-11, 1N6 Wlft <::aii'UATIYW: 'I'O'raLI fm: RU. MtC ~ ll, 1913 ... " ... ,. ~ ~ .!2:-.!! ~ ~ ~ .!!.:......!! !!!!:....!! ~ aEVDtUES &1rnJ.n911 on ln..,.staent.a • 3,1]2 ... .. , 1,211 • 2,229 • 1,91)] ' 12,082 I 7,)81 "-••••-nt of propt11rty ownen 21,0Jl 2,220 1,110 52,410 1,]11 J,S7S 1S,415 2),126 104,4 )2 Contr1buti0ft fro. City of ... l_oodl I nt•r•at on u••••-nu c,su 101 -15,00) 2,JH 7,721 ... Mi.acellaneoua ---------'fotal re.,.n!Ha "·'" ),4 71 5,440 15,01 ,,,., I,U2 25,1]6 56,20) ll l ,lllJ IDDIOI'nla.U Con.t.ructlon 1,111 Interea t ••PIMa 6 ,0 16 1,10) 15 ,4 7l '·"' ,, ... 9,290 5),649 ]7 ,468 lltlacellaneou.a .. , I ll ,. t,o:u '" ,. ,,. ,. 8,682 Total upendit.uea '·'" Ill 1,471 ''··" 2,116 ),206 10,026 54,)73 47,911 DCUI IDIPICIDC't) ar ..,_,.. ot'a IIPDIDl'!'Uaa UD OI'Ua DID 22,171 '·-l,MJ H,112 (115 1 5,U6 1 5 ,1 10 1,1)0 6),812 PUWO 1.\LMCa (DIPICI~I -J'UIUU.I 1 U l,t1D I '·"'' l11,lt!U {1 14 ,171 ) (11,)71 ) 111,911) (14 , 1041 (1 0),395) (219,84 11 n.D 1.\LUCa I DC'lCl!'l ~~)1 • (11,2t)) I 10, 74t • f 7,4)21 1(1U,47tl • (12,116 ) • I U,lt2) I ISI,994 1 1(101,565) SI1S6,0091 I . 48 f I • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL RfPORT __ _ CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLO RADO Side¥.lk lurplu or _,,_, Conc ~reu ~ ~ ~ O.fl.elencx ~ .-ept.e ... nt !!!! .!.!!! 909 6,9t! ),125 600 61,216 • 5],491 ),161 39,119 18,018 287,876 107,684 171,400 , .. 115 ]),1 66 19,756 ,.. 4,161 6,915 42,Sot 18,678 119,)28 579,586 1t,oe1 18 ,071 li,Hl 11 7,119 U,ln 160,665 1]1 ,Sl0 , ... "' ... 14 ,019 16,070 tt,Oil , ... ll, Ul 11,461 211,1)6 554,7 19 11 9,01)) 4,190 6,165 9 ,111 ... ll5,59l 24,861 11,)51 70,415 (liS, 717) (1]9,191) (864,064 1 -----------------1 19,011 1 • 15,541 • 71,200 Jl256,606) , .. 1661,6051 t tl19 ,1971 ········· - [ I • I • • 49 • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • I • • 50 • • • • • • • ,.., ~ I . . ::.g Cii ,.., ..... c z 0 (/) • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL RlPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • I • • 51 • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO ENTERPRISE FUNDS a::t1B I NING BAIA!CE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 1984 WITH <XlMPARATIVE TOTALS FOR DECEMBER 31, 1983 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Central cash and investments Other cash and investments Accounts receivable Miscellaneous receivables Due fran other goverrments Inventories of material and supplies Total current assets CY!'HER ASSETS: Investment in Bi-city Joint Venture RESTRICTED ASSETS Central cash restricted for bond reserve Central cash restricted for debt service Central cash restricted for Bi-city construction Total restricted assets PROPERTY, PLANT, AND ~IPHmr Distribution and collection systems Treatment plant and buildings Raw water and treated water service • facilities Raw water -storage facilities Land other Construction in progress Less accumulated depreciation Total property, plant and equipnent ~ $ 893,994 1,020 111,521 25,000 20,327 88,823 ----------1,140,685 ---------- 4, 724 '903 7,186,605 6,079,039 3,234,273 1,094,238 956,397 3,298,688 26,574,143 3, 727,499 22,846,644 $23,987,329 a:a:••x•==•== 52 1984 Golf ~ ~ $ 4,235,634 3,101,274 $ 187,640 249,283 24,230 79,959 ---------·------------ 7,690,380 187,640 --------------------- 12,108,298 -------------------- 309,000 60,000 37,702 9,406 864,664 -------------------·--1,211,366 69,406 -------------------- 3,837,334 3,758,124 1,103,216 59,500 4,163,599 68,351 425,872 1,050,769 ---------------------- 8,774,078 5,692,687 -------------------- 2,027,556 303,705 --------------------- 6, 746 ,522 5,388 ,982 ----------------------$27 ,756,566 $ 5 ,64 6 ,028 ======••=:cs :::z::x===:=:aa: • 1983 ~ ~ $ 5,317,268 $ 3,455,26] 3, 102,294 2,886, l8E 360,804 490,424 49,230 20,855 100,286 11 ' 619 88,823 100,764 ---------------------- 9,018, 705 6, 965,111 ---------------------- 12,108,298 11,654,864 ---------------------- 369,000 327,000 47,108 39,146 864,664 317 ,813 --------------------1 ,280,772 683,959 ------------·---------- 8,562,237 8,394,667 12,047,945 11,971,751 6,079,039 6,079,039 3,234,273 3,225 ,!>10 5,317,337 5,4 17 ,535 1,450, 620 1 ,330 ,572 4,349,457 3,04 3 , 703 ----------------------41,040,908 39 ,4 63,177 ---------------------- 6 ,058 , 760 5,485 ,9b' ---------------------- 34,982,148 33 ,977' 214 ---------------------- $ 57 ,3?9 ,923 $5 3 ,2Bl ,l 4 " =="~~====3'=:::~::: :zta:::;:;::;==-== " • I • • • - • • ANNUAL FII~ANCIA.L REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLO RADO 1984 Golf 1984 1983 LIABILITIES AND FUll> EQUITY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CURRENT LIABILITIES CUrrent installments of long-tem debt $ 495,000 $ 185,000 $ 15,000 $ 695,000 $ 710,000 Interest payable 126,796 41,565 6,906 175,267 190,815 Account s payable 36,107 2,016 3,320 41,44 3 92,441 Other current liabilities 1,113,376 1,113,376 821 ,185 -----·------------------------------------------------Total current liabilities 657,903 1,341,957 25,226 2,025,086 1 ,814,441 ------------------------·--------------------------LONG-TERM DEBT General obligation refunding water bonds, including bond prsni..n of $48,790 5,553, 790 5,553, 790 6 ,057 ,712 Refund i ng sewer revenue bonds, series 1976 58 1 ,000 581,000 706 ,000 Use tax refunding bonds, eeries 1983 l, 765,000 440,000 2,205,000 2 ,280,000 ----·-----------------------------------------------Total long-term debt 5,553,790 2,346,000 440,000 8,339, 790 9,04 3 ,712 ------------------------------------------·----------Total liabilities 6,211,693 3,687,957 465,226 10,364,876 10,858,153 -----------------------------------------------FUND EQUITY Contributions: t.timated acquiaition coets of property, plant and equi!ITO!flt 5,845 ,542 1 ,809 ,583 7 ,655,125 7 ,655 ,125 General qoverrnent 4,172,120 4,172,120 4,172,120 Federal Gover!'lnllnt 63,231 918,275 940,446 1,921,952 1 ,921 ,952 State Goverl'1111!nt 6,397 6,397 6 ,397 Other Gover1'1111!nts 928,256 928,256 Federal and State Goverl'1111!nts -Bi-city treatment plant 9, 257.329 9,257 ,329 9 ,257 ,179 Systsn developnent fees 900,070 10,126,165 11 ,026,235 8 ,967 ,013 ----------------------------------------------------Total contributed cap! tal 6,808,84 3 23 ,046,005 5,112,566 34,967,414 31 ,979 ,786 ---------------------------------------------------Retained earnings (deficit): Reserved for Bi-city Joint Venture construction 864,664 864 ,664 317 ,813 Reserved for revenue bonds, series 1976 and 1983 346,702 69 ,406 416 ,108 166 , 146 ---------------------------------------------------·-Total reserves 1,211, 366 69,406 1,280, 772 683 ,959 -----------------------------------------------------Unreserved 10,966 ,793 (188, 7621 (1 ,170) 10,776,861 9 ,759,250 -----------------------------------------------------Total retained earnings 10,966,793 1 ,022,604 68 ,236 12 ,057 .633 10 ,44 3 ,209 I --------------------------------------------------• • Total Fund ~ity 17 .775 ,636 24,068,609 5,180 ,802 47,025 ,04 7 42 ,4 2l ,995 ----------------------------------------------------$23.987.329 $27,756 ,566 $ 5,646,028 s 57 .389,923 $5J ,2fll ,l4 8 ··········· ........... ........... ·•········· •~~~•••• •"""-lnr: 53 • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLE WOOD CO LORADO Dri'ERPRISE ruNDS CCf1BINING STATEMEm' OF REVENuES, EXPENSES, AND OlANGES IN RETA I NED EARNINGS DEX:fl'1BER 31 , 1984 WITH CXJ1PARATIVE 'roTALS FOR DEX:fl'1BER 31, 1983 1984 Gol 1983 OPERATING REVENuE ~ ~ ~ Total Total Wate r sales $ 2 ,289, 726 $ $ 2,289, 726 $ 2,263 ,058 Disposal services 3,605,293 3 ,605 ,293 4,166,578 Connection fees 24,904 61,908 86 ,812 60,626 Raw water sales 632,385 632,385 588 ,014 Herber ships 19,881 19,881 25,676 Green fees 289,008 289,008 302,210 Rentals 6,050 93,246 99,296 102,784 Other 20,009 71,927 91,936 87 ,185 ------------------------------------------------Total charges for services 2,947,015 3 ,693,260 474,062 7,114,337 7 ,596 ,131 ----------------------------------------------OPERATING EXPENSES Source of supply 255,374 255,374 289,728 Power ar>:l pmping 452,661 452,661 390 ,805 Pur i ficat i on 331,942 331,9 42 319,791 Transmission ar>:l distribution 230,289 23 0,289 205,579 San! tary systBn 98,800 98,800 93,595 -------------------------------·--------------------Total direct systBn operating costs 1,270,266 98,800 1,369,066 1 ,29 9,498 City's share of Bi-Ci ty Joint Venture operations expenses 1, 780,764 l, 780,764 1,651,648 CUstomer accounting ar>:l collecti on 113,000 270,000 383,000 36 3,000 Mni n i strati ve ar>:l general 205,251 23 3 ,225 190 ,358 628,834 528,833 Ca!mod i ties ar>:l contract ual servi ces 8, 746 213,418 222,1 64 202 ,975 Other 71,785 115,870 187 ,655 192 ,889 Deprec iat ion, i nclud i ng Bi -C ity Joi nt Venture depreci ati on i n sewer fur>:l of $305,797 ar>:l $290,807 i n 1984 aoo 1983 respect! vely 326,971 483,560 70,963 881,4 94 86 1 ,418 ---------------------------------------------------To ta l operating expenses 1,987 ' 273 2,990,965 47 4,739 5,452,977 5 , 100 ,261 -----------------------------------------------------I NCXJ1E (LOSS) FRQ1 OPERATIONS 959,742 702 ,29 5 677) 1,661 ,360 2 ,495 ,870 OTHER INCXJ1E (EXPENS E) Gain on sale o f lar>:l 1 ,178 ,802 l , 178 ,802 Earnings on i nves bnents 90,781 736 ,6 41 24,910 852 ,332 426 ,895 Interest expense (39 1 ,514 ) (2 15 ,042) (4 2 , 313) (6 48,869 ) (650 ,257) Mi scella neous 51 ,089 51 ,08? 40 ,158 ------------------------------------------------929,158 52 1 ,599 (17 ,403 ) 1,4 33 ,354 (183 ,20 4 1 -------------------------------------------------NET INCXJ1E (LOSS ) BEFORE OPERATING TRANSF ER 1 ,888 ,900 1 ,223 ,894 (18 ,080) 3 ,094, 71 4 2 ,3L2 ,b6U OPERATING TRANSFER (1,279,000) (1,279 ,0 00) -----------------------------------------------------NET INCXJ1E (LOSS) BEFORE EXTRAORD I NARY I TEMS 609,900 1 ,223 ,89 4 (18 ,080) 1 ,815 , 7 14 2 ,312 ,6bb EXTRAORD 1 NARY ITEM-LOOS 00 BONJ llEFEASAN::E 1190 ,000) ----------------------------------------------------NET fNCXJ1E (LOSS) 609 ,900 1 ,223 ,89 4 (18 ,080) 1 ,815 , 714 2 ,122 ,666 ----------------------------------------------------RET AI NED EARN ! NGS (DfF ICIT) -J ANUARY l 10,356 ,893 86 ,316 10 ,4 4 3 ,209 8 ,396 ,313 TRANSFER TO SYST EM DEVELOPMENT FEES - CONTRIBUTED CAP I TAL (201 , 290 ) (201 ,290) (75 ,770) -------------------------------------------------RETAINED EARNINQ> (DfF ICIT) -DEX:EMB ER 31 $10. 96 6 ' 793 $ 1 ,022 ,604 $ 68 ,236 12 ,057 ,6 33 SI0 ,44 J ,20Q ··········· ........... ·········· . ......... .... _~&·-. I . 5 4 • • - • • • • • r-.'.J Al INANCIAL R~ POR f ITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLO RADO Em'ERPRISE f'UN)S a:t1BIN ING STATfMENT OF O!ANGES IN FINAICIAL POSITION YEAR E!VED DOCD1BER 31, 1984 WITH CCt!PARATIVE TOTALS FOR 1983 SOURCES OF WORK! NG CAPITAL Net ir.cane (loss) before extraordinary items EXtraordinary !tan-loss on bord defeasance 609,900 Net incane (loss) !tans oot requiring (providing) working capital: Depreciation Abardonnent of utility plant ard aqu i pnent Gain on sale of land WOrking capital provi ded (used) by q>entiona Proceeds frCIII sale of lard Proceeds frCIII aale of borda Contrib.Jtiona frCIII City Contrib.Jtion frCIII other Goverments Contrib.Jtiona frCIII Federal ard State governnents -Bi..City Joint Venture Systen development fees Total sources of working capital USES OF WORKING CAPITAL Add i tions to plant ard equ i pment Reductions in long-tem debt Invest:nent in Bi -city Joint Venture Inc:rea se i n restricted cash Total uses of work ing cap! tal INCREASE (DECREASE ) IN WORKING CAPITAL WORKING CAPITAL -JANUARY 1 WORKING CAPITAL -DfX:D1BER 31 609,900 326,971 (1 ,178,802) (241,931) 1,279,000 161,591 1,198,660 662,237 503,922 1,166,159 32, SOl 450,282 48 2 ,783 INCREASE (DECREASE) IN WORK ING CAPITAL REPRESEm'ED BY Increase (decrease) in current assets Cash Receivables Due fran other governnents Material ard supply inventories Increase (decrease) in current liabilities Current installments of long-tem debt Interest payable Accounts payable Due to other furds ard Bi..Cl ty Joint Venture Unearned disposal service revenue other fees payable INCREAS! (Dtx:REASE) IN WORKING CAPITAL (61 ,002) 29,792 ( 6,832) (11 ,941 ) ---------- (49,983) -------- (60,000) (12,671) ( 9,813) ---------- (82 ,484) --------- $ 32 ,501 ..•........ 55 1984 Golf ~ 1, 223 ,894 (18 ,080) -------------------- 1 ,223,894 483,560 1 , 707,454 928,256 150 1,696 ,341 4,332,201 949,094 185,000 759,231 589,322 2,482,647 1,849, 554 4,498,869 (18,080) 70,963 52,883 52,883 69,498 15,000 7,491 91,989 (39 ,106) 201,520 s 6,348,4 23 s 162,414 ••••••••••• -~'"'"""""'==·· .. 2,173 , 720 (111 ,037) (34 ,605) 75,499 -------------------- 2,138,182 (3 4,605) ------------------- 40,000 5 ,000 (2, 702) (324) (41,201) (175) 277 .537 14,994 ---------------------- 288,628 4, SOl --------------------- s 1,849,554 (39 ,106) ........... ........... • 1984 Total 1 ,815, 71 4 1, 815 ,714 881,494 (1,178,802) 1 ,518,406 1,279,000 928,256 150 1,857,932 5 , 583.744 1 ,680 ,829 703 ,922 759 ,231 596 ,813 3 , 740 ,795 1 ,842,949 5,150 ,671 1983 Total 2 , 312,667 (190,000) 2,122, 667 861,418 3 ,550 2 ,987 ,635 2,280 ,000 47,185 2,236 2,44 0 ,002 7 . 757 ,058 355 ,056 2 , 661,440 543,738 377 .226 3 , 93 7 .460 3,819,598 1 ,331 ,073 6,993,620 s 5 ,150 ,671 2 ,078 ,11 3 3,502 ,945 (81 , 245) 362 ,293 68,667 (7 4,148 ) (11,941) nq --------------------- 2,053, 594 3 , 7ql ,8 19 --------------------- (15 ,000) (270 ,000) (15,697) (35 , 118) (51,189) (49,258) 277 .517 322 ,373 14.994 4, 224 --------------------- 210 ,645 (2 7 ,779) --------------------- 1,842,949 s 3 ,819,5~~ .......... ......... ;~, I • -• • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORAD O WATER UTILITY l'tHl FOR '!HE YEAR I!H>ID DFOMIER 31, 1984 water sales Connect ion charges ~ System Development ~ $ Tap fees paid by developers Equipnent contributed by developers Raw water sales $2,289,726 24,904 632,385 90,781 1,178,802 51,089 77,900 83,691 Rentals Earnings on investments Gain on sale of lard Miscellaneous Source of supply Power ard I'Uil'ing Purification Transmission ard distribution Mninistration, general accounting ard other Debt service Acquisitions of property, plant ard equipaent Depreciation Transfer to General l'IJnd $4,267,687 $ 161,591 ·········· ........... EXPI!H>I'ruRES Expenses l!:hc\Jn- ard brances Capital Transfers 12(31(84 Outlay $ 255,374 $ 25,096 $ 452,661 331,942 15,245 230,289 390,036 13,593 391,514 326,971 662,237 1,279,000 ----------------------$3,657.787 $ 53,934 $ 662,237 ·········· ·········· ·········· 56 ~ $2,289,726 24,904 77,900 83,691 632,385 90,781 1,178,802 51,089 ------- $4,429,278 -········ Depreciation ard Debt Service $ 568,691 (326,971) --------- $ 241,720 ·········· Variable Budget Favorable (As Revised) (Unfitvorable) $2,325 ,000 $ (35,274) 24,904 50,000 27,900 83,691 600,000 32,385 3,000 (3,000) 82,080 8, 701 1,178,802 25,000 26,089 ---------------$3,085,080 $1,344,198 ··········· ·········· Enc\Jn- brances Budget 12/31 /83 ~ As Revised $ (41, 507) s 238,963 s 269,052 (1,430) 451,231 392,597 (6,210) 340,977 338 ,81 3 (8,670) 221,619 322 ,233 (12, 296) 391,333 364 ,882 960,205 960 ,205 (92,297) 569,940 638 ,500 1,279 ,000 1 ,279 ,000 ----------------------------$ (162,410) $4.453.268 $4 ,565,282 ·····••:.:•• az,..=raaaaa:a a:aza:;a•aa • • Variance 'I Favorable {Unfavorable, s 30,089 (58 ,634) (2 ,164) 100 ,614 ( 26,451) 68 ,560 ---------- $ ll2 . 014 a:o:aaaaa:z~:a t I . -• • • ANNLAL FINANCIAL RI::.POnT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Disposal services Connection charges Mninistrative fee -Bi-city Joint Venture Earnings on investments Rentals Miscellaneous Bi-ci ty treatment Sanitary systE!IIIS Mninistrative and general, accounting, contractual services and other Debt service Acquisition of property, plant and equipment Depreciation • S9iER tJI'ILITY PUll !!'OR 'n!E YEAR IH>fD DS:!M1ER 31, 1984 $3,605,293 61,908 736,641 6,050 20,009 $4,429,901 ~ System Developnent ~ $ 1,696,341 $1,696,341 Expenses Encun- and branc:es Capital ~ 12/31/84 Oltlay $1,780 ,764 $ $ 98,800 627,841 18,072 215,042 483,560 949,094 ---------------------$3,206,007 s 18,072 s 949,094 .......... -·····-·· ·········· 57 ~ $3,605,293 1, 758,249 736,641 6,050 20,009 ----- $6,126,242 -········ Depreciation and Debt Service $ 112,702 (483,560) --------- $ (370,858) . ......... • Variance Budget Favorable (Aa Revised) (Un~ble) $3,842,300 (237 ,007) 794,800 963,449 243,000 493,641 4,100 1,950 9,300 10,709 ---------------$4,893,500 $1,232,742 ··········-= ....... ,. ... Encum- brances Budget 12/31/83 ~ l\s Revised s $1,780,764 $1,846 ,446 (17) 98,783 99,003 (4 ,429) 641,484 457,600 327.744 362.745 (24,144) 924,950 1,100,000 -------------------------$ (28, 590) $3,773,725 $3,865,794 ·······-·· .......... ·········· Variance Favorable (Un~ble) s 65,682 220 (1 83,884 ) 35,001 175,050 ----------s 92,069 ....... ,..,.. I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Memberships Green fees Golf cart rental Interest incane Other: Concessions Miscellaneous Aaninlstratlve & General Cannodi ties & Contractual Services llcquisl tiona of Property Plant and fl:juipnent Debt Service Depreciation • Expenses and Transfers $ 190,358 213,418 42,313 70,963 ------ $ 517,052 ·········· $ I'IJNICI PAL 00LF CXXIRSE FU!IJ POR 'n1E YFAR EH>E%> Dl!x:rMIER 31, 1984 Revenues and &xlqet Contributions (As Revised) $ 19,881 289,008 93,246 24,910 29,047 42,880 $ 498,972 ··········· $ 20,000 335,000 100,000 12,000 40,000 28,800 $ 535 ,800 -········· EXPEH>ITUREs Encun-Depreciation brances Capital and 12/31/84 t\ltlay Debt Service $ $ 2,120 69,498 10 ,175 (70,963) $ Variance Favorable (Unfavorable) (119) (45,992) ( 6, 754) 12,910 (10 ,953) 14,080 $ (36,828) Encun- brai'K:es 12/31 /83 ~ s 190,358 (968) 214,570 69,498 52,488 -----------------------------------------$ 2,120 $ 69,498 $ (60, 788) $ (968) s 526,914 -·········· -········ ·········· ·=·=-· ... ·=·= •*'•=••••z= 58 • Variance Budget Fa vorable As Re vi sed (Unfavorable 204' 789 14.431 220,576 6 ,006 49,580 (19,918) 52 .48 8 --------------------s 527 .433 519 ·=·==-=•=:z• •=•====a:a& I • • • • • • • z -i rr1 ::0 z l> r (/) rr1 ::0 < C'i rr1 "T1 c z 0 (/) I . • I . I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI T Y OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 59 • I • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WO OD COLO RADO CURRENT ASSETS Central cash and investments Cash on hand Inventories of material and supplies Other current assets Total current assets PLANT AND El;)U I 1'MENI' Building • Office furniture, fixtures, and inprovements Autanotive Machines and equi(nent Less aCCI.III.ll ated depreciation Total plant and equi(lnent Im'ERNAL SERVICE FUNDS CCHHNING BALAM::E SHEET DECEMBER 31, 1984 WITH tnfi>ARATIVE 'TOTALS roR DECEMBER 31, 1983 $ Central Services 110,806 28,431 3,686 ---------$ 142,923 --------- 1,911 54,352 ----------56,263 36,761 ------- 19,502 ------- $ 162,425 ·········* 60 1984 Servi-Self ~ Insurance $ 508,380 $ 584,048 25 331,100 15,222 -------- 839,505 $ 599,270 -------- 633,672 12,226 2,429,029 304,695 -------- 3,379,622 2,055,415 ----------1,324,207 --------- $2,163,712 $ 599,270 e:a2:S!:za:: =======·=- • 1983 ~ Total $ 1,203 ,234 $1,275 ,154 25 25 359,531 266,911 18,908 21,896 -------------------$ 1,581,698 $1,563,986 ----------------·-- 633,672 633,672 14,137 14,137 2,429,029 2,272, 771 359,047 348,287 --------------------3,435,885 3,268,867 2,092,176 1 ,923,161 -------------------1,343,709 1,345,706 --------------------- $ 2,925,407 $2,909,692 =========== ======:::=== II r 1 II I • • ANNL.AL fINANCIAL R PORT LIABILITIES AND FUtl> D;lUITY JURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts payable other current liabilities: Estimated dental and basic medical claims payable Deposits Total current liabilities fUI>V D;lUITY • Retained earnings: Unreserved Reserves: Stop loss Long-term disability Total reserves Total retained earnings Contributions : Water Utility Fund Sewer Utility Fund City of f:nglewood other scurces Total contributions Total fund equity Central Services $ 3,031 ----------3,031 --------- 146,036 -------- -------- ------ 146,036 ------- 13,358 -------- 13,358 ---------159,394 ---------$ 162,425 ·:ill···=··=· 61 • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO 1984 Servi-Self 1983 Center Insurance Total Total $ 28,528 $ 2,697 $ 34,256 $ 67,526 166,195 166,195 221,926 2,143 ------·---------------------------------28,528 168,892 200,451 291,595 --------------------------------------- 741,709 32,181 919,926 794,995 ----------------------------------------- 317,281 317 ,281 406,706 80,916 80,916 17,743 --------------------------------------398,197 398,197 424,449 -----·-------------------------------741,709 430,378 1,318 ,123 1,219 ,44 4 ------------------------------------- 118,379 118,379 11 8,379 52,000 52,000 52 ,000 1,184,601 1,197,959 1 ,189, 779 38,495 38,495 38 ,495 ------------------------------------··---1,393 ,475 1,406,833 1,398,653 ----------------------------------------2,135,184 430,378 2, 724,956 2,618,097 -----------------------------------------$2,163,712 $ 599,270 $ 2,925,407 $2 ,909,692 ••~••=•••a ===z=====• ======::z::a:::z ==•=::=::z::z:: I . • -• • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS <D1BINING srATEMEm' CF REVDroES, EXPENSES, AK> OiANGES IN RETAINED FARNINGS DECEMBER 31, 1984 WITH <:n!PARATIVE TOTALS FOR Dl'l:018ER 31, 1983 1984 Central Servi-Self OPERATING REVDIUE ~ Center Insurance Total Billings to departments $ 207,470 $1,315,925 $ 701,205 2,224,600 Billings to joint venture 30,070 30,070 ---------------------·----------------207,470 1,315,925 731,275 2,254,670 OPERATING EXPENSES Cost of material used 82,249 489,430 571,679 Personal and aaninistrati ve services 20,921 297,210 12,650 330,781 Commodities and contractual services 88,184 273,385 361,569 Insurance expense: Basic medical 444,762 444,762 Major medical 15,567 15,567 Dental 121,449 121,449 Life 100,999 100,999 Long-term d isability 69,057 69,057 Miscellaneous 17,965 17,965 Depreciation 4,148 253,649 257,797 -----------------------------------Total operating expenses 195,502 1,313,674 782,449 2,291,625 --------------------------------- IICOME (LOSS) PRO! OPERATIONS 11,968 2,251 (51,174) (36,955) OTHER IICOME Earnings on investments 8,240 57,276 54,024 119,540 Hi soe llaneous i ncane 16,094 16,094 ---------------------------- NET I ICOME (LOSS) 20,208 75,621 2,850 98,679 -----------------------------------RETAINfll EARNINGS -JANUARY 1 125,828 666,088 427,528 1,219,444 ---------------------------------------RETAINED EARNINGS -DEX:EM!ER 31 $ 146,036 $ 741,709 $ 430,378 1,318,123 ···-=···-=·· ---······ ··===-===== ·=··=·==·= 62 • • 1983 ~ $1,993,785 41,831 ---------- 2,035,616 551,084 318,856 303 ,254 579,873 10,945 lll,228 48,249 61,600 15,681 300,598 --------- 2,301,368 --------- (265, 752) 117 ,475 1,194 ---------- (147 ,083 ) ----------1,366,527 ---------- $1,219,444 z====•:z:z:::r. I • • - • • • • A~'\IUAL I lf~ANC AL R PORT C TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO I m'ERNI\L SERVICE P'UNDS <n1BINING STATFl'1Em' CF 01ANGES IN FINAN:! AL POSIT! ON DD:»1BER 31, 1984 WITH CCt!PARATIVE TOTALS FOR DEX:EMBER 31, 1983 SOURCES OF WORKING CAPITAL Net incare (loss) Items not requiring (providing) working capital: Depreciation Gain on Sale of Equi(nent Working capital provided (used) by operations Proceeds from disposition of fixed assets Capital contributed from other funds Total sources of work ing capital USES OF WORKING CAPITAL Additions to plant and equipment Total uses of workinq capital INCREASE (DEX:REASE) IN WORKING CAPITAL WORK! NG CAPITAL -JANUARY 1 WORKING CAPITAL -DB:El'mER 31 II-CREASE (DEX:REASE) IN WORKING CAPITAL REPRESE!n'ID BY Increase (decrease) in current assets Central ~ $ 20,208 4,148 --------- 24,356 --------- 24,356 -------- -------- -------- 24,356 115,537 ------ $ 139,893 ··=·=>="=··· Cash $ Inventories 28,893 (520) (2,175) Deposits Prepaid insurance 26,198 Increase (decrease) in current liabilities Accounts payable 1,842 Estimated dental and basic medical claims payable Deposits payable 1,842 II-CREASE (DEX:REASE) IN WORKING CAPITAL $ 24,356 • 1984 Servi-Self Center Insurance $ 75,621 $ 2,850 253,649 (12,823) ------------------- 316,447 2,850 46,243 8,180 ------------------·- 370,870 2,850 ------------------- 289,220 --------------·-·----- 289,220 ------------------- 81,650 2,850 729,327 42 7 ,528 ------------------ $ 810,977 $ 430 ,378 aaaaz:=:aa•• :=•·=·=·=· $ (41,989) $ (58,824) 93,140 (813) ------------------- 51,151 (59 ,637) (28,356) (6, 756) (55, 731) (2,143) --------------------(30,499) (62,487) -------------------- $ 81,650 $ 2,850 •m:=~~:.••==r::.=: •=••==•azs 63 • 1983 Total Total 98,679 $ (147 ,083) 257,797 300 ,598 (12,823) ----------·--------- 343,653 153,515 46,24 3 8,180 25,097 --------------------398,076 178,612 -------------------- 289,220 212,826 --------------------289,220 212 ,826 -------------------- 108,856 (3 4,214 ) 1 ,272,392 1 ,306 ,606 -------------------$1,381,248 $1,272,392 ========== =======·== (71 , 920) $ (60 ,51 4 ) 92,620 36 ,692 (2 ,175) (2 , 751) (813) 9 ,602 -------------------- 17.712 (16 ,971' (33,270 ) 13 ,1 2~ (55, 731) 4 , 1 I~ (2 ,14 3) -------------------- (91,144) 17 .24 J -------------------- 108,856 $ (3 4,2141 :==···=··= z:::..J::I:I:IZz:.,:; I • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK • I • • 64 • • - • I ) L [ [ l I I • • • • • ., 0 c (") j; ::0 -< ., c z 0 C/) I . . • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO l'IDOCIARY PIJNDS <XH!ININ:: BALA1CE SHEET DI!OMIER 31, 1984 WITH a:t!PARATIVE TOTALS 1'011 THI!! YEAR llllli!D DI!X:lMIER 31, 1983 l'ena!on Trust Pllnda ~le Trust Pllnds Total Ma~ter Parks and ~ ~ ~ Trust Pllnd llecreat! on 1984 1983 ASSETS cash 7,601 $ 3,481 $ 6, 768 $ 15,789 $ 4,494 $ 38,133 $ 27,475 Certificates of depoe!t 1 ,850,000 Accounts rece! vable 33,025 26,572 45,113 104,710 76 ,498 D! v !denda and !ntar .. t receivable 62,568 40,559 58,315 161,442 166,638 Investment•, at •rket 4,501,062 2,659,693 4,237,539 11,398,294 7 ,858,515 -----------------------------------------------Total Aaaeta $4,604,256 $2,730,305 $4,347.735 $ 15,789 $ 4,494 $11,702,579 $9,979,126 -········ -········ -········ -········ •••••:s:::za••• ·····-=··== LIABILITIIS Account• Payable $ 31 $ $ $ $ 31 $ 9,282 Due to other funds 10,092 5,466 5,535 21,093 l'tMl !!Q!1ITY FUnd Balance 4,594,133 2, 724,839 4,342,200 15,789 4,494 11,681,455 9,969,844 ----------------------------------------------$4,604,256 $2,730,305 $4,347.735 $ 15,789 $ 4,494 $11,702,579 $9 ,979 ,126 -······=-· .......... -········ -···-····· •••••::a••••a ........... 65 • • I . - - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL_ AEPOR.:!:.__ CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORAD O PfliSION 'l'RUS'l' PUflS a:H!INI~ STA1'!11Em' ca' Rr:VEI«ll:S, ~ AI«> OfANGES IN nHJ BMA1CE YEAR !Kl!Zl IB:!Ie!R 31, 1984 WITH CX»>PARATIVE TOTALS I!"'R YEAR !Kl!Zl IB:!Ie!R 31, 1983 Total !lrplovees' Poll~·· Firanen•s ~ Operating reve..._: City contributions $ 396,674 252,251 $ 348,072 $ 996,997 !lrployee contributiona 60,405 61,881 122,286 Volunteer Firenen'a contribution 7,500 7,500 -------------------------------Total contributiona 396,674 312,656 417,453 1,126,783 ------·-------------------------Dividend and interest incane 409 ,825 247,479 396,367 1,053,671 Revaluation of marketable MC- uri ties (not in exceea of cost) 49,884 35,120 49,884 134.888 Hi sce11aneoua 10,696 4,382 10,398 25,476 -----------------------------·--Total operating revenues 867,079 599,637 874,102 2,340,818 -------------------------·-------Operating expenaes: unrealized loss on marketable aecuri ties Benefi ta paid 97,555 221,432 271,461 590,448 Escrow agent f-10,504 6,521 10,335 27 ' 360 Hisce11aneoua 7,017 2,391 2,460 11,868 ----------------------------Total operating expenaea 115,076 230,344 284,256 629,676 --------------------------------Net incane 752,003 369,293 589,846 1, 711 ,142 Fund balance-January 3,842,130 2,355,546 3, 752,354 9,950,030 -------------------------Fund balance-oec...ber 31 $4,594,133 $2,724,839 $4,342,200 $11,661,172 -·········· -········ ·········· ····~·,..··· 66 • Total ~ $ 961,005 122,298 7,500 --------- 1,090, 803 --------- 827,907 7,804 ---------·- 1,926,514 ---------- 218,424 550,484 20,389 9,255 ---------- 798,552 ---------- 1,1 27 ,962 8,822,068 ---------- $9 ,950,030 •••••~r•••;z I • • II • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO <XK!INING S'l'ATI'.MENT a! 01ANGES IN FINAICIAL POSITION WITH CX»!PARATIVE TOTM.S P0R YFAR !NliD D1!0K1ER 31, 1983 Total ill.! Total ~ !lployees ' Policemen's Sources of worki!!!i ca12i tal Net lncane $ 752,003 $ 369,293 $ 589 ,846 $ 1, 711,142 $1,127,962 l«lRKING 0\PITAL-JI\WARY 1 3,842,130 2,355,546 3, 752,354 9,950 ,030 8,822,068 ------------------------------------- i«lRKING CAPITAL-OECfHIER 31 $ 4,594,133 $2,724,839 $4,342 ,200 $11,661,172 $9,950,030 -········· -········· .......... sra:aaa:aaaz;z; ••=•••c••• IN:RI!'ASE (DfX:RF.ASEI IN ~ING CAPITAL REi'RESEIITm BY Increase (decrease) In mrrent assets: Cash $ 4,230 $ 1,938 $ 4,021 10,189 $ (19,374) Certificates of deposit (800,000) (250,0001 (800,000) (1,850,000) (3,150,000) I>.Je frao the Cl ty of Englewood 9,315 7,086 11,811 28,212 (11,523) Di vldencSa and interest reoel vab1e (573) 202 (4,825) (5,196) 121,691 Investments 1,546,022 612,458 1,381,299 3,539,779 4,196,450 ----------------------------------------758 ,994 371 ,684 592,306 1,722,984 1,137,244 Increase (decrease) liablll t lee: in current Accounts payable 6,991 2,391 2,460 11,842 9,282 --------------·--------------------------- IN:RFASE (DI'J:RFASI!i) IN ~ING CAPITAL 752,003 $ 369,293 $ 589.846 $ 1, 711,142 $1,127,962 ........... -········ ·········· ............ ... ,. .. ,.:. .. I • • 67 • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO CD1BININ:; STAT!MJ!m' OP REYEN!JEs, EXPENDITI.RES All) ClW«ZS IN P'Uit) BAI.\!CES YEAR Eti>I'D DI!X:I!HBER 31, 1984 WITH CXJ1PARATIVE TOTALS POR YEAR ENDEO DOCD1BER 31, 1983 Parka and Malley Recreation Center Trust Trust ~ l'llnd l984 Revenues: Contributions $ 2,990 $ 2,990 Earnings on cleposi ts 1 ,572 396 1,968 Total revenues 4,562 396 4,958 Expendi turea 4,489 4,489 Excess of revenues over expenditures 73 396 469 !'IJnd balances at beginning of year 15,716 4,098 19,814 l'llnd balances at end of year $ 15,789 $ 4,494 $ 20,283 68 • Totals l98) $ 5,084 1, 338 6,422 500 5,922 13,892 $ 19,814 I • • • • • • • )> () () 8 z ..... C) ;:o 8 , en () :I: 1"'1 0 c r 1"'1 en I . . • • • ANNUA.l HNANCIAL REPOR T CITY OF ENGLE WOOD CO LORADO GENERAL FIXID ASSET NXOUNr GROUP OCI!EDULE <P OlANGES IN GENERAL FIXID ASSETS BY FUM), FUICTION, AND ACTIVITY GENERAL FIXID ASSETS Land Buildings lrtprovements other than buildings Equipnent Total General Fixed Assets SOURCE <P IIIVES'n1ENI' IN GENERAL FIXID ASSETS Public IrtproVEJnent Fund General Fund water Fund ServiCenter Fund Special Assessnent other catpOnent units: l'DOA EURA Total PUN:.'TION AND ACTIVITY -General Fund Leg islative and Counsel • City Manager City Attorney l!l!ployee relations Treasury and records Purchasing ltmicipal Court Accounting Data processing Revenue division Public works aaninistration Engineering Streets Traffic Fire Police Parks Senior recreation center Housing and redevelopnent Code enforcerrent Planning Comrunications General goverrment Building rraintenance Library Recreation Center other catpOnent units : l'DOA EURA Total reporting entity YEAR mlED DEX:!M!ER 31, 1984 General Fixed Assets January 1, 1984 Retirements Transfers and and Other Additions ~ Adjustments $ 5,084,954 4,661,316 $5,279,262 $ s 183,084 386,331 4,018, 755 276,515 511,699 6,408 ------- $14,151,356 ------·------·------------$6,250,560 $ 6,408 $ z.a,.a•zz:=••• -=•••s""•·:a• -=•::o:za:=::;=• :z:.-aa:z••== $ 7,949 ,441 5,089,050 8,185 $ 586,154 $ $ 328,633 6,408 3,920 399,284 --------- 13,449,880 -----------------------914,787 6,408 ---------------------------------- 66,399 789 635,077 5,334,984 ------ $14' 151 '356 ----------------------------$6,250,560 $ 6,408 s ............. asaz:=a:z:o:""a .,.a:zazaa:a:o;:a a:a::=raza:a::az:o:: $ 10,673 8,112 20,600 $ $ $ 1,450 1,845 8,399 22,813 1,020 450 2,000 23,301 29,124 348 5, 743 864 493,351 22,172 13 ,467 318 3,505 34,938 2,584 316,807 5,600 585,852 2,025,210 974,352 2,579,367 1,865,341 111,933 182,704 5 ,958 6,477 86,282 86,281 1,273 14,680 11,090 1,050 1,821 448,145 3 ,322 2, 771,756 12,919 (757 ' 136) 1,169,062 82,772 313,944 757 ' 136 -------------------------------13,449,880 914,787 6,408 ----------------------------------- 66,399 789 635,077 5,334,984 --------------------------------------$14' 151' 356 $6,250,560 s 6,408 s -········· -········ .......... . ......... 69 • Genera l Fixed Assets Decerrber 31 , 1984 10,364,216 4,844,400 662,846 4,524,046 ----------- 20,395,508 :==r:=:z:a:::J:=::== 8,535,595 5,411,275 8,185 3 ,920 399,284 ---------- 14,358,259 ----------- 67,188 5,970,061 ----------- 20,395,508 =-=••=•a•=•== 10 ,673 9 ,562 22,445 8 ,969 24.813 23,301 29 ,4 72 6,6C ":' 5 15 ,523 13 ,785 3 , 'iO'i 37 .522 32?' 40' ~9", -R'i 7 ,201 , ... Jn ~90, R29 2,? S ,b.tr, 1, qc;j , : ... 1 , 2 ' !<;, ;JO '.l ,Gi 4'i:,•H .l ,I)L ~~~"0 1~.91" J , 251 , P14 1 ,071 ,n .. ~ -------~- 14 ,35::.,2'~ ----------- (//,! W); S.970 ,v·,, 2J, 3 9 ~. 5~. ••1.~•a-2aa• I • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO COMBINED SCHEDULE OP INVI!!S'l'ICI!!NTS AND CENTRAL CASH DI!!C!Mlii!R 31, 1984 Intereat !!!.!!...J.ll CERTIPICATI!!S OF DEPOSIT Centennial State Bank ColUJibia Savinqa and: Loan 12,00 -12.01 10.35 Firat Interatate Bank of Enqlewood Pirat National Bank of Enqlewood International Bank of Englewood Repub lic National Bank 10.85 -11.50 Total certificatee of dapoa it GOV I!!RIIMI!NTJU. SECURITIES Federal Hc.e Loan Bank Federal National Mortgage ~aociation Federal Land Banka u. s. Treaaury Bond u. s. Treasury Billa u. s. Treaaury Hotea Total GoverNiental Securitiea CORPO RATE SECURITIES Louisville Rail l!quipMnt Truot Soaboarc! Coaotline Rail l!quip .. nt 'l'ruot Southern Rail &quipMnt Truat Union Pacific Equip.ent Truat B&nkera Trua t Acceptance Morgan Guarantee Truat Total Corporate Securitiea TOTAL -JU.L PU»OS -DIVI!!STMENTS ADO CASH AND MISCELLANIIOUS REC!IVULES HISC!LLANilOUS PAYULI!!S /PREPJI.IO I NVI!!S TMEII'I' OI!!S I GilA TEO CASH AND INVI!!STM!NTS, EXCLUDING PI!!NSION PUWOS INVI!!S'I'HI!!IITS III!!LO POR OTHIIRS RESTRICTED CASH AND INVI!!STMENTS CENTRAL CASK AND INVI!!S'l'MENTS • 8.90 -12.00 8.oo - 10.70 - 11.30 - 8.23 - 9.25 - 8.5o 8.75 11.5D 12.03 8.10 8.625 11.68 9.875 10.50 11.50 9.00 8.25 9,96 9.25 Maturity ~ 3/05/85 - 6/17/85 1/07/85 - 1/07/85 - 3/19/85 2/25/85 - 2/25/85 - 5/10/85 - 7/22/85 11/15/93 2/21 /85 - 1/31/85 9/0l/85 9/15/85 9/15/85 3/01/85 3/18/85 5 /14/85 70 6 /1 8 /85 4 /22/85 5/11/85 3/18/85 1/25/93 5/1 4 /85 8/08/85 11/15/85 • Par Value 300,000 100,000 525,000 •• 100,000 100,000 425 ,000 $ 5,550,000 1, 230,000 1, 200,000 75,000 200,000 10,210,000 6,000,000 $18,915,000 250,000 100,000 250,000 100 ,000 1,000,000 1. 000,000 s 2,700,000 $27,165,000 Market ~ 300,000 300,000 100,000 100,000 525,000 525,000 4 ,100 ,000 4,100,000 100,000 100,000 425,000 42 5,000 ---------------------- $ s, 550,000 $ 5, 550,000 ---------------------- 1, 226,303 1 ,203,682 1,198,906 1, 201 ,750 72,188 7 4,5 78 193,375 169,250 9, 699,366 9, 966,956 5,992, 343 6,024,090 ---------------------- $18,382,481 $18,64 0,306 ---------------------- 252,057 252,18 7 100,881 100,000 24 1,608 250.000 97.554 100 ,000 963,661 1, 000,00 0 961,022 1 '000, 000 ---------------------- $ 2,616, 783 $ 2, 702,187 _____ .., _____ ----------- $26,5 4 9,264 $26,89 2,4 93 ··········· 555,7 46 (46. 2 17) (3,20 3 ,685 ) (28 2,486) ( 1, 280 , 7 7 2) ----------- $22,291,8 50 ··········· t II II I • • - l L • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIII.L REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOO D COLORADO s::HmUt.E OF GRAN!' ACTIVITY YFAR EHJ!l) DEX:!l'18ER 31, 1984 Federal Grant Title Grant Numer Share Grants Grants of Receivable Grants Grant Receivable Total (Payable) Earned Revenues (Payable) ~ l/l/84 ~ ~ 12/31/84 ComunJ ty Development Block Grants B-81-05-08-008 11-82-DH-08-0054 State~ity Development-Block Grant C-85-3387 Envi ronnental Protection Agency C080-329-0l-O F'ederal Revenue Sharing 06-200-300-3 River Development 08-00856 Phase u NOTE: Grants idoinistered by the City of !h;llewood Housing Authority have been excluded fran this schedule since the Housing Author! ty is excluded fran the City of !h;llewood 's reporting entity. See Note 1 in "Notes to the F'inancial Statements" for further explanation. Grant l'llllli:Jer 11-82-ai-08-0054 has been divided between the City of !h;llewood and the Housing Authority for $312,750 and $318,750 respectively. <klly the City's portion of the grant and expend! tures is reported above. 71 • • Grant Expend itures ~ Total Gr ant Expenditures To Date I • • • AN UAL FINANCIAL REPORT & COMPANY . P . C . The Honorable Ma yor and Members of City Counc il City of Englewood, Co lorado • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO We have examined the com bined f inanc i al statements of the Cit y of Eng l e wood, Colo rado, as of a nd for the year ended December 31, 1984, and have issued our report there on dated March 29, 1985 . Our examination was made in accordance with g enerally accepted auditing standards; the provi- sions of "Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations , Programs, Activities and Functions," promulgated by the Comptroller General , which pertain to financ ial compliance audits; the Office of Management and Budget's "Compliance Supplement for Single Audits of State and Local Governments " (Compliance Supplement); and provisions of Office of Mana g ement and Budget (OMB) Circular A-102, "U niform Administrative Requirements f or Grants-in-Aid to State and Local Governments," Attachment P, "Audit Requirements " and th e Guidelines for Financial and Compliance Audi t s of Federally As s i s ted Programs (Guidelines) and, accordingly, includes such tests of the accounting record s and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessa r y in the circumstance s. Th e r e porting ob j e c tives for compliance audits contained i n th e Guide- lines su gg est an examination of all transactions for complia nce purposes, as o pposed to the selec tive testing required by Attachment P; therefore , we have followed t he reporting ob j ectives of Attachment P. In addition, the Gu i de li nes do not provide suf ficient guidance for determining the re presen- t at ive number o f charges t o be examined and performing the proc edures to ascertain compliance . Acco rd i ngly , we u tilized othe r mater ials a s s u pp le- ments i n those a r eas . Attachment P r equires that the examination include a determina tion o f whether the federal financial repo rt s (includ ing financial status reports, cash reports, and claims for advances and reimburs ements) prepared by t he City of Englewood contain acc urate and reliable financial data. We have been informed that OMB interprets the phrase "accurate and reliable finan- cial data" to mean that the federal financial reports pr esent the underlying financial data of the grants within limits that are reasonable and practic- able to attain under the circumstances. CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 10125 W. 6t h Ave .. Suite 200 Lakewood. Colora do 802 15 (303) 238-5300 72 • I • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPOW The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of Englewood, Colorado Page Two • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO In our opinion, except for the matters that might have come to our attention had our examination encompassed the provision of the Guidelines referred to in the second preceding paragraph, for the tested operations and records, the City of Englewood complied with the material terms and condi- tions of its federal grants, contracts and agreements, and the tested federal financial reports present the underlying financial data of the grants within the limits described in the preceding paragraph. Further, based upon our examination and the procedures referred to above and except for the matters that might have come to our attention had our examination encompassed the provisions of the Guidelines referred to in the second preceding paragraph, nothing came to our attention to indicate that the City of Englewood had not complied with the compliance matters referred to above, and the federal financial reports do not present the underlying financial data of the grants within the limits described in the preceding paragraph. This report is intended solely for the use of the City of Englewood and the cognizant audit agency and should not be used for any other purpose. ~At~=r~ i G; .. tJ /P.e . LEHMAN, BUTTERWICK & COMPANY, P.C. March 29, 1985 73 • I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK II I • • 74 • • • • • • C/) _. l> I _. • en • • _. 0 l> r C/) 1""1 (") _. ~ • • L • • • ANNL..AL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO TABLE l GENERAL <DVERtH:NTAL EXPENDITURFS BY FIJICI'ION (2) lASI' TEN FIOCAL YEARS Fi s cal General P.Jblic Public Culture & Debt Year Governnent (3) Safety Works Recreation Service(l) Total 19 75 1,196,987 2,992,087 1,141,521 1,120,427 58,720 6,509,742 1976 1,218,001 3,257,570 1,437,435 1 ,263,810 58,720 7,235,536 1977 1,421,484 3,748,746 1,651,020 1,940,415 58,720 8,820,385 197 8 1,670,508 4,202,562 1,967,407 1,825,616 58,720 9, 724,813 1979 1,880,585 4,757,373 2,456,998 1,889, 778 58,720 11,043,454 1980 2,029,759 4,993,093 2,391,568 2,006,120 58,720 11,479,260 1981 2,359,541 5,434, 715 2,713,442 2,196,547 58,720 12 ,762,965 1982 2,787,850 8,076,484 2,548, 775 2,451,387 58,720 15,923,216 1983 3,378,935 6,681, 728 2,554,846 2,482, 727 129,994 15,228,230 1984 2,986,336 7,320,525 2,834,506 2, 739,721 1,503,294 l7, 384 ,382 (l) Pays for debt servi ce on mortgage installment note on City Hall property which was assumed upon purchase of City Hall, as well as debt service for Special Revenue Funds and Debt Service Funds. The debt service for City Hall is included in general goverment, but broken out for this table. The debt service for the City's General Obl igation Bonds is $519,797. (2) Includes expend itures by Genera l , Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds. (3) Includes capital outlay in the Spec ial Revenue Fund. Source: Carbined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Encunbrances and Changes in Unreserved Fund Balances -Budge t and Actual (Non-GMP Bas i s). .... .... .... .... •••• .... .... .... ''" .... .... •••• •••• ... . .. ... ... • •• Indicator # 1 REVENUES PER CAPITA CPI WAiti lll' Uft11i! O.crwu t-e .. t .,.,.,u., ""''"""• "" uptu ,_...,, .. u .... , UU lt16 lf'n 1 171 un 1 .. 0 lMl IHJ l MJ I Mt • 75 .. .. .. .. . ... . ... . ... Indicator #2 SALES TAX ELASTIC REVENUES lllHiflli TIOD : hcr .. •t•t ••Wit ef e1uttc ~rttht renftHI U I "rc.ef!Ute If Nt .,.rott•t rt111enw.1 ••• ..,.,.. ..... nt41. .OIIIIIIiiUl.aliCNit, , ......................... .. ................ _ 1111 1"1 ltll 1e11 leJJ lMO lMl lNJ lMJ ltU • I - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD , COLORADO TABLE 2 GENERAL OOVErut'lmt'AL RE11ENUES BY SOURCE (1) LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Earn i ngs on Deposit Licenses Inter-Charges Fines and Fiscal and Goverrmental for and Miscellaneous Year Taxes Permits ~ ~ ~ ~ Total 1975 4, 716,120 112,264 1,189,766 349,859 99,129 144,765 6,611,903 1976 5,442,223 133,955 1,069,618 391,676 95,966 333,611 7,467,049 1977 7,355,885 157,953 1,230,465 520,249 125,016 133,163 9,522,731 1978 8,207,856 176,402 1,227,501 553,665 162,290 335,276 10,662,990 1979 8,743,248 168,182 1,089,356 579,488 179,845 318,193 11,078,312 1980 9,575,183 195,112 1,182,667 657,084 300,536 327,452 12,238,034 1981 11,164,532 345,815 1,041,934 786,100 315,365 522,005 14,175,751 1982 12,018,609 269,535 1,125,243 848,117 304,906 570,991 15,137,401 1983 12,630,983 309,395 1,447,727 872,348 273,372 373,515 15,907,340 1984 14,812,987 382,368 1,438,543 921,261 258,692 870,467 18,684,318 (1) Includes General, 5pecial Revenue and Debt Service P\mds. Source: Canbined Statement of Revenues, Expend i tures, -Budget and Actual (Non--GAAP Basis) Indicator #3 ONE TIME REVENUES IIIAIUUNi TI£ND ; IM.reUhlt UU Of ON- t1• o~re ttng rt\'•1'1.,., u • """"~" of Mt operet h•t ,..v~t.tts and Ehcunbrances ........ ········ ........ ,, ..... . •....... ••oo .eoo IUO,ho and Olanges in Unreserved FUnd Bal ances Indicator +4 PROPERTY TAX REVENUES CPI WARMING li[IIC!): Otclhd l'lg or Mgtttvt vrowtll h proPt rty tu rtVt i'I IIU (COIUl•l'll Oo 11trs) l tM,MO MAT .. W.TC"'-'OMM.U.na.t ":ti:.~~:,•~-::,~• un UJ'& U1J Ull lilt lMO 1Nl l MJ l N J liN UU 1"6 lt'J1 ltll 1971 lMO lMl lHJ lMJ 1 ,... 76 • • ~ I • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO TABLE 3 PROPERTY TAX LEVIES liND COLLI!X:TIONS UIST TEN FISCAL YEARS Ourent Total Olrrent COllections Delirquent Total Total COllections Levy Collection Tax Tax as Percoent of Tax Tax Tax Year: .!!!!. ~ Collections O..rrent ~ Collectiona COllections • O..rrent ~ 1974 1975 652,891 651,327 99.76 87 651,414 99.77 1975 1976 789,074 771,827 97.81 184 772,0ll 97.84 1976 1977 842,152 835,216 99.18 1,557 836,773 99.36 1977 1978 872,589 869,648 99.66 2,234 871,882 99.92 1978 1979 769,976 765 ,452 99.41 4,069 769,521 99.94 1979 1980 795,448 790,400 99.37 4,241 794,641 99.90 1980 1981 818,479 813,840 99.43 3,854 817,694 99.90 1981 1982 805,968 801,697 99.47 5,218 806,916 lOO.ll 1982 1983 837.939 818,827 97.72 3,447 822,274 98.13 1983 1984 l, 319,946 1,306,681 98.99 1,915 1,308,596 99.14 Inclur:le8 interest and penalties. (l) Taxes are levied on January l for collection in the followirg calendar year. (2, Tues are duo and poyable on January l and becaDe delirquent for the first half po}'llent on Horch 1, eecond half po-nt on August l, or full poyment on Hoy l. (3) IW>altiea ..-after the delirquent date are l/2 of l\ ~r~til August l, 2/3 of l\ after August 1. (4) After October l, delirquent real estate is advertised for sale. '!be tax sale is held about !leoeber of~ year. (5) 'ft1e collectirg agent is Arapahoe County wich ra::eives a l\ collection fee for services renderad. COllections -are net of the 1\ collection fee, except for the 1973 collection~~ wich are shown as actual. Sourcoo -Ar-'>oe County Aaaeuor and Treasurer Indicator #5 UNCOLUClED I'IIOI'EIITY TAX[$ IMNnt-e ... t •f ~~~Me11ec:telll ...... rt.t t.•• •• • ,.,,_.,.u11 ,,,..,~..,.t_,u. lntH ...... ICM.~---........... ,._ ... "'-"'•·Uoo• ltll U'K lt'tl 1..,. U,. 1.. 1•1 a•a t•J UN 77 Indicator #6 Ull[lt CHAIIG£ COIIEIIAG£ .. ,,.. .. ,., ... ,._, f~••rclw"ttt'" • ,.rced.a,. ef ._.ul ••IIIII'I'NIIt"""'-' ~,.,,.,,..lautl ··""'''' • I • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWO OD COLORADO TABLE 4 .O.SSESSED AND ESTIMATED 1CnP.L VAWE OF TAXABLE PROPERTY lAST TEN FIOCAL YEARS Real Property Per80nal utilities Total Pr't~?'loc:tual Levy Assessed Fat. Actual Aasesaed Aaoes~t. llctual Assessed --Est. l\ctual Year Value Value value Value Value Value Value 1975 90,173,990 300,579,966 15,400,258 92,880,155 5, 310,560 17,701,866 110,884,808 1976 96,849,190 322,830,633 18,116,818 109,798,897 6,054,090 20,180,300 121,020,098 1977 98,672,810 328,909,367 20,568,214 124,655,842 6,054,090 20,180,300 125,295,114 1978 100. 238,120 334,127.067 21,346,634 129,373,539 6, 769,890 22,566,300 128,354,644 1979 102,192,350 340,641,166 23,397.326 141,801,975 6, 942,430 23,141,433 132 ,532 ,106 1980 103,323,570 344,411,900 26,139,377 158.420.466 6,979,900 23,266,333 136,442,847 1981 105,632,730 352,109,100 •20,694,958 125,423,980 8,091,690 26,972,300 134,419,378 1982 107.475,240 358,250,800 21,273,438 128,929,927 8,091,690 26,972,300 136,840,368 l983H 130,807,023 436,023,410 23,423,467 141,960,406 7 ,421, 980 25,593,034 161,652,470 1984 138,815,436 544.689. 832 24,699,025 149.691,060 7,972,260 27,490,551 171,486,721 (1) Real Property is aaaeued at 21\ for residential and 29\ for Comlerc i al/Industrial. (2) Rersonal Property is taxable on a variable rate -5\ for inventory and 29\ for others. (3) Utilities are aueaed at a 29\ value for taxing purposes. Source -Arapahoe Olunty ,......,110r Olange in valuation 10ethod directed by State Statute. Hojor property revaluation occurred in 1983. Indicator #7 liE VENUE EXCESSES 011 SlfOIITf ALLS hw::re1u I• ,.. • .,..,. t "-rt h lh ..... ~ .... ll .. . , .. , ...... , ... ,...,..."" ... ... Indicator #8 )fttrtU iflfNl opertt l •l •• ,.,.41t vrel hofllt.,lt •CII hrt ) ,..., u pl u Value 411,161,987 452,809,830 473,745,509 486,066,906 505,584,574 526,098,699 504. 505. 380 514,153,027 603,576,850 721,871,443 • ....... ntal ......... ~ ~-·c-o···-··· a•n ltl l u n 1111 aen a... 1111 nu u., 1-. 78 • • I • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO T~E 5 PROPERTY TAX RATES PER $1000 ASSESSED VALLIITION -AIL 01/ERIAPPING GJVER!f!Dn'S [A5T '!'J!2j FISCAL YEARS (l) (2) 5pecial Total Levy Collection City of School Tax Tax Year Year l'l'lglewood District RA~~)' ~ Rate ~X 1974 1975 3.970 53.430 8.800 .820 67.020 1975 1976 6.970 56.480 8.800 l.OOO 73 .250 1976 1977 7 .000 51.920 9. 798 1 .940 70 .658 1977 1978 7 .000 53 .100 8. 769 .us 69 .287 1978 1979 6 .000 52.900 8. 702 .436 68 .038 1979 1980 6 .000 48.870 9.223 .455 64 .548 1980 1981 6 .000 51.850 l3.329 .875 72.054 1981 1982 6.000 57 .410 13.981 .900 78 .291 1982 1983 6 .000 54 .400 16.261 .900 77.561 1983 1984 8.211 55.830 16.783 .879 Bl. 721 TAX LEVIES !974 1975 349,415 4, 702,584 5,041,503 452,805 10,546,307 1975 1976 653 ,894 4,179,994 5,913 ,969 773 ,979 11,521,836 1976 1977 789,074 4, 461,371 8 ,053,642 1,540,605 14,844,692 1977 1978 872,589 5,627,435 10,931,929 521,102 17,953,055 1978 1979 769,976 5 , 721,871 ll, 167,212 559,515 18 ,218,574 1979 1980 795,44 8 5, 435,730 12,227,363 603,215 19 ,061,756 1980 1981 818,479 5,904,673 17,820,338 1, l39 , 846 25,683,336 1981 1982 805,968 6, 391,770 20,252,489 1, 266,867 28,717 ' 094 1982 1983 837,939 6, 259,654 26,211,310 1,401,172 34,710,075 1983 1984 1,319,946 7 ,374,292 32,641,404 1,691, 761 43,027 ' 40 3 (l) Average of achool districts in the City proportioned by assessed valuatton for 1972 thru 1979 levy years. (2) Enqlewood Diotrict ll, does not include Sheridan or 0\erry Creek for 1980-1981 levy year . Source -Arapahoe County Assessor. I • • 79 • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLOR ADO TABLE 6 CITY CF m::L81000 Billed Percent of OJrrent OJrrent Collections Fiscal A.ssessnents Assessments To amount -..!!!!_ ~ ~ 1978 $112,293 $118,333 1979 97,371 95,468 1980 141,778 177,825 1981 208,403 170,909 1982 148,734 150,503 1983 136,144 137,085 1984 137.078 181,442 Information required for this table prior to 1978 is not readily available. SOurce -Arapahoe County Assessor. Placal lear 1975 1976 1977 1983 1984 TABLE 7 COIPARATIVE RATIO CF <Z11ERAL B01D!D D£BT TO ASSESSED Vl\LUES Alll NET BONDED D£BT PER CAPITA LAST TEN FIOCAL YEARS Percent of Asaeued Value *Bonded Bordad Debt to ~at ion of Real !state Debt Asses!led Value 35,933 $110. 884. 808 $2,225,000 .0200 36,564 121 ,020,098 2 ,112,000 .0174 36,645 125,295,114 2,072,000 .0165 30,438 161 ,652,470 4,600,000 .0285 30,577 171,486,721 4,600,000 .0268 ~ lOS\ 98\ 125\ 82\ lOU lOU 133\ Bordad Debt Per eaeita $ 61.92 57.76 56.54 151.13 150 .44 • General obligation bonded debt only awlicable for years shown for last ten years . Source -Arapahoe County Assessor. Indicator #9 FIX[D COlTS VIU:IfltiG TIIWD : hiC:,...II"f ftqc~ CMtell e 1 a Mt'Cet~t. .. •t Mt .,.,..ll"f•"""'tt"'"•• 80 Indicator # 10 ~ •• ,. ... ,,.,,,.t.., ..... ttt •......,ttYI"ftala,.,.(.ef!Uia ef .. lart-. ..... ,u • I t I • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WO OD COLORADO TABLE 8 COIPI1TATION Q> LEGI'.L Dl'l3T MAR>IN Assessed value Debt limit -3\ of assessed value 11mount of debt applicable to debt 1 illll t Total bonded debt Other debt Lese: Mortgage installrEnt note Water refln:l i ng bonds Sewer refWld i ng revenue bonJs ~ial aasea~~~~ent bonds Golf Courae bonds &lglewood lll:ban llerael bonds Calputer leaae -capitalized Cl:lmputer leaae -capitalized Net Debt QJtstanding $ 523,948 6,000,000 2,531,000 1,453,399 455,000 22,990 ,000 75,888 335,717 Total anount of debt applicable to debt limit Legal debt margin (1 ) ~rcentage Applicable to Goverrmental tni t $38. 029. 399 935,553 $38,964 ,952 34,364,952 &lglewood 's Share o f Debt $171,486,721 5,144,602 4,600,000 $ 544,602 Excerpt fr0111 Section lot of the ._ "'le 0\arter of the City of &lglewood: Indebted.-. and obligati ons of the City shall be i ncurred and limited aa provi ded in Article lU of the Constitution of the State of Colorodo applicable to towns and c i ties except u otherwloe provided i n th i s 0\art er. Council shall have power to I ssue general obligat i on bonds of the Ci ty for any (><Kllic capital purpose, upon ma j or! ty vote of the taxpayi ng electora of the Cl ty voting thereon at a apeci a l elect i on, prov i ded, howll!'ver, that w t er ext ens i on aOO \e ter lmpr"ovanent bonds may be iasued without an e l ect i on upon a det eD!I i natl on to that effect by Council. The t otal outstandi ng general obligat i on l rdebtedness o f the City , other than for wa ter bocxbt, s hall not a t any tiae exceed three percent (3\) o f the assessed valuation of the taxable proper t y wi thin the City oa shown by the l ast preced i ng asaes......,t fo r tax purposes. lill ter bonds shall 100 t ure and be paya b l e as provided by the ordinance authorizi ng the 18suarce of sol d bonds . (2) Pleaoe refer to the No tes to Financial Statenents, particularly No te 4, for detailed infolliiOtion roogardlng long-te011 irdebtednesa of the City. TABLE 9 COIPIITATION cr DIR!I:T AID OVERLAPPING DEBT <Z11E1W. <IlL I Gt. TIONS City of &lglewood ca...ni ty Center bonds of 198 3 Ooneral obl gation lOiter bond& of 1978 and 1980 Leas: ,.ter fin:! -r ted bonds School Diattict No. 5 Total direct and overlapping cW>t Net Debt QJtstand i ng $ 4,600 ,000 $ 6 ,000 ,000 6 ,000,000 $ 4,600 ,000 $113,390,000 81 Ple rcentage Applicable to Goverrmental ~ 100.000 100.000 ~ 100.000 1.000 • &lglewood'• Share of ~ $ 4,600,000 6,000 ,000 6,000,000 4,600,000 $ 1,133,900 5, 733 ,900 I • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO TABLE 10 RATIO (F ANNU1U. DEBT SERVICE IOO'E!Ili'IU!ES I'OR GENERAL BCN>E0 DEBT TO TOTAL GENERAL IOO'EIIDI'IUIES Percent of Debt ServiCe to Fi scal *Total Debt Total General Total General !!.!!. Principal ~ ~ !rpend1 tures Expendt tures 1975 1976 $113,000 $93,910 $206,910 $7,233,121 .03 1977 40,000 91,960 131,960 8,142,978 .02 1984 519,797 519,797 17,392 ,975 .03 •General obligation debt service i s only applicable for years shc:Nn for laat ten years. Indicator # 11 OI'[AATtHG INCOM[ 0.. O[,tCfTa _.IIIC T!£110 : ... ,...,, ........ t.f Jl'ftlttlf-epertUttt *ftctts •• • "~"-ta ,, .. ,....,It, .......... -----~· .. 82 Indicator #12 !!!!!J.!i..!!l! lrH1t•tt~~~ ..,..urtc1.H fwMM1.-ce•f_.,....,1 filM •• • ,.f'U'IU .. '' •t.....-•tt"',...,...., • I • • - • liN ~ JAL ~ I'~ANCIAL Rf:-PORT 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Gtoss(2 1 ~ 838,669 1,318,850 2, 485,334 1,990,511 2,406,606 2,603,102 3, 467.736 3, 762,853 6,882,362 6,126,242 1,135,024 1,484,841 l, 731,917 3,129,284 3,218,297 3,013,583 3,018,227 2,983, 780 3,103,036 4,429,278 (3 ) ~ 494,213 582,571 1,089,301 l, 576,497 1,879,194 2, 326,925 2,372,580 2,452,546 2,519,815 2,507,405 555,301 638,478 719,943 1,092,068 1,036,369 l, 144,982 1,403,852 1,511,592 1,550,334 1,660,302 Net Rovenue Available for Debt Service 344,456 736,279 1 ,396,033 414,014 527,412 276,177 1,095,156 l, 310,307 4, 362,547 3,618,837 579,723 846,363 1,011,974 2,037. 216 2,181,928 1,868,601 1,614,375 1,472,188 l, 552,702 2, 768,976 • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO ---------------- Tl\BLE 11 Debt Service llocfl i r......,t Principal ~ Total 65,000 135 ,000 145,000 150,000 160,000 160,000 95,000 165,000 230,000 145,000 425,000 370,000 400,000 410,000 545,000 605,000 650,000 680,000 720,000 555,000 85,788 98,124 91,120 84 ,487 77,666 70,528 128,445 286,981 240,994 217,745 197,217 192,853 172,427 437,202 493,675 512,270 512,738 489,605 448,605 405,205 150,788 233,124 236,120 234,487 237,666 230,528 223,445 451,980 470,994 362,745 622,217 562,853 572,427 847' 202 1,038,675 1,117. 270 l, 162,738 1,169,605 1,168,605 960,205 COverage 2.28 3.16 5.91 l. 77 2. 22 1.20 4.90 2.90 9.26 9.98 .93 1.50 1.77 2.40 2.10 1.67 1.38 l. 26 1.33 2.88 (l) lelile wter banda iaauad in recent )'eM& hove-., qeneral obligation borda, it is the Ci ty's stated i ntention to pay the Mbt 11ervice fr<111 the wter fl.lnd. (2 ) Gross revemet~ incllde tap fees. (3 ) Excludes depreciation, interest eq>ense, ard fl.lnd transfera. Source -Arapahoe Olunty AMeuor Indicator #13 UOUIDrTY ~ .. ,. ... t ... ....,,., u ........ ,., ... ht.-.1'-'ltl u • fr.~~~f:, •f CYPrnt 83 Indicator #14 LCMIG 1'(.1bif1 kiT .... , ... lUIID : hac~''""..._, ef tWt '''*' lMf ............ • .-rw-u,. •' ,,.._,_, "'l•U• • I • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT .!!!!. 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 .!.!!!. 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 tH5 ltK 1!117 1911 1919 1990 1991 lt92 1993 1985 1986 1917 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 ~ 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 ~ 5. 70 5.70 5.85 6.00 6.10 6.25 !:!.:.!! Pr i ncipal 245,000 260,000 275,000 300,000 315,000 345,000 365,000 395,000 420,000 445,000 485,000 515,000 375,000 6 '· 740,000 ill! Principd 125,000 130,000 U5,ooo 145,000 155,000 16,000 706,000 ~ 10.50 10.50 10.50 1.50 8.50 8. 75 8. 75 9.00 9.25 !!!!! 10.75 10.75 10 .75 10.75 10.75 8.50 8.50 8. 75 9.00 9.15 9.30 9.45 9.60 '· 70 9.80 9.90 10,00 10.00 • • • CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO .!:!:!! ~ !!!!... Pr i nci pol .!!!!:!!.!!! Totol ~i [.ant. 284,400 7.80 250,000 11,105 866,705 269,700 6.60 250,000 61,105 847,505 254,100 6. 70 250,000 51,)05 no, tos 237,600 6. 75 250,000 34,555 822,155 219,600 6.80 260,000 17,680 812,280 200,700 545,700 110,000 545,000 158,100 553,100 134,400 554,400 109,200 5S4,200 82,SOO S67,SOO 53,400 S68,400 22,500 397,500 $ 2,206,200 ' 1,260,000 251,650 ., 8,464,850 SlifER REV!l«JE ...... 1983 Tota l ~ .... Prineif!r!l ~ Raqu i r..enu 4l,S87 10.50 60,000 166,213 392,800 14,463 10.50 80,000 159,912 404,375 27,052 10.50 120,000 lSl ,SlJ 0),565 19,115 8.50 160,000 U8,912 463,027 10,455 8.50 180,000 125,313 n o, 768 1,000 8. 75 220,000 110,012 )C7,012 a. 75 210,000 90,763 370, 76) 9.00 320,000 66,262 386,262 9.25 405,000 37,463 442,463 133,672 s 1,825,000 $ 1,046,363 $ 3,711 ,0)5 CJ:U COlltS! 1.1)£ TAX REVP'.MJE 101) ~19SJJ 1'ot.•l Prirci£:!1 ~ ~.-!£~t..! 15 ,000 41,4)7 S6,4)7 20,000 )9,862 59,862 )0,000 37,763 67 ,761 40,000 34,612 14 ,612 45,000 11,21) 76 ,213 5",000 27,388 82 ,)&8 70 ,000 22,575 92 ,575 80,000 16 ,450 96,4 ~ 100,000 9,250 l09,2SO • 455,000 s 260 ,550 S 7l5,550 CI:M1tlflTY ~ CZNERAL CIK..IQTION 80t1:6 Totol Pr inC'ipel ~ l[eftenr• 105 ,000 44 1,085 546 ,085 115 ,000 429,5)5 !.44 ,535 125,000 416,885 5H,b85 135 ,000 40 3,760 SJB , 7 t~O 150,000 )89,922 519 ,922 165,000 37 4,548 539,548 180 ,000 360,110 540 ,1:0 I 200 ,000 344,810 544 ,810 215,1)00 327,41 0 su ,uo • 240,000 308,275 548 ,275 260 ,000 286 ,435 546,435 290,000 262,385 1)52, J"S llS,OOO 235,125 550 ,125 )45,000 205,200 s;o, 200 310,000 172,080 552,080 420,000 115,220 555,220 460,000 94,060 55 4,060 500 ,000 48,750 548,7~ ----------------$4,600,000 15,235,595 • 9,815,595 ---------------- 84 • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI T Y OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO TABLE 12 (COIII'IN!JED ) Pa vi ng Di s trict f22 Year Princ1pal In t erest Pav i ng Distri ct f24 Pnnc:i pel Interest Pav ing District f25 Princ1pal Interest Pav i ','5 Distr ict f26 Pr1nc1pal ~ 1985 3,089 682 9,390 3,145 1986 46,000 1,545 13,000 341 9,390 3,145 1987 9,390 3,14 5 1988 9,390 3,145 1989 179,000 4,695 3,145 1990 36,999 1 ,572 $ 46,000 $ 4,634 $ 13,000 $ 1,023 $179,000 $ 42,255 $ 36,999 $ 17,297 Downtown Pavi!!j District f27 Pavi~ Di strict 128 Pavi~ District f29 ~ovaoent Distr i ct Total ~ Princ>pel ~ Prlnc:pal ~ Pr 1nc pal Interest Prtnctpal ~ ~i ranents 1985 6,270 63,398 17,586 32,817 136 ,377 1986 6,270 63,398 17,586 32,817 193,492 1987 80,000 3,135 63,398 17,586 32,817 209,471 1988 63,398 17,586 $398,800 16,408 SOB, 72 7 1989 472,600 31,699 17,586 708,725 1990 17,586 56,157 1991 17,586 17 ,586 1992 17,586 17 ,586 1993 17,586 17.586 1994 227 ,000 B, 794 235,794 $ 80 ,000 $ 15,675 $472,600 $285,291 $227,000 $167,068 $398,800 $114,859 $2,101 ,501 ····-···· • Bonds are callable on any i nterest ~t dote (June l and Decaober 1) except Paving Distr i ct f2 7 am Doointown Impl:""'-f1t District (hbruary l anll l\ugWit l) Note : 'ft1e principal am i nterest on the speci a l asoetl"""'"t bonds a re baaed on the bond agr........,ts . tto..lever, the bonds •Y be reti red u IDCJI"ieY becotes availabl e and, thus, these tabl es are uject to atl j ust8ent. IClR'lQ(Z IIISTALU4Drl' NOTE 5 . 625\ Total To tal Yea r Pr incipal ~ Requ i r""""ta Year Pr i nc i pal Interest Aaqu i ranents 1 985 30 ,014 28,706 58 ,720 1992 44,456 14 ,264 58 ,720 1986 31 ,746 26 ,97 4 58 ,720 1993 47 .022 11,698 58 ,720 1987 33 ,579 25 ,141 58 ,720 1994 49,736 8 ,98 4 58,720 1988 35 ,517 23 ,203 58 ,720 1995 52 ,607 6,113 58,720 1989 37,567 21 ,153 58 ,720 1996 55,644 3,076 58 ,720 1990 39,736 18,984 58,720 1997 24 ,294 345 24,639 1991 42 ,030 16,690 58,720 'I'DTN. $523 ,948 $205 ,331 $729 ,279 8 5 • I • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO TABLE U (<Difl'IIIUED) OU>ITAL LFASES CD1Pin'ER LEASE CD1Pin'ER L!'ASE Total Year Pr i ncipol ~ ~innents Total Pr i ncipal ~ ~iraoen ts 1985 37 .944 6,474 44,U8 1986 37 ,944 2, 77 5 40,719 1987 1988 73,361 28,123 101,484 79,997 21,487 101 ,484 87.234 14,250 101,484 95,U5 6,360 101,485 'IUTAL $ 75 ,888 $ 9,249 $ 85,137 -----$335 ,717 $ 70 ,220 $ 405,937 -'·······- ~ Total lllocF i raoents Year Principal 1985 7,451 1986 8,196 1987 9,016 1988 9,917 1989-1990 135,943 5, 749 5,004 4,184 3,283 145,457 13,200 13,200 13,200 13,200 281,400 Total $170,523 $163,677 $334,200 I':IDI -NOTE PAYABLE Year Pr incipol ~ Total ~iranenta 1985 26,337 2,985 29,322 Total $ 26,337 $ 2,985 $ 29,322 Eln TAX I!CRmENT AND R!PUNDING NOTES 1984 1984 c ~ ~ Principal ~ Rate Pr incipal ~ ~iranents 1985 10.00 999,000 10.00 $ 650,000 $ 1,649,000 1986 10.00 999,000 10.00 650 ,000 1,649,000 1987 10.00 999,000 10.00 650,000 1,649,000 1988 10 .00 9,990 ,000 U6 ,250 10.00 6,500,000 270,833 17,177,083 ---------------------$ 9,990,000 $ 3,U3,250 $ 6,500,000 $ 2 ,220,833 $22,124,083 ··-······ ·--··-·· --······· .......... 86 • I • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO • llfMOQ!ApHIC STATISTICS l'iacal Pl!r capita &!ucation Level Of MacHan School !!!E. ~ation (l) InoaN! !2) ft>DMI School! !!!j ~ Pru:ollment !41 1984 30,577 7,837 NA 30 3,369 1983 30,438 7,837 NA 30 3,369 1982 30,229 7,837 (8) NA 30 3,524 1981 30,160 NA NA 30 3,504 1980 30,021 11,615 (A) NA 30 3,698 1979 30,388 10,580 NA NA 3, 710 1978 30,756 9,494 NA NA 4,022 1977 31,122 8,557 NA NA 4,229 1976 31,489 7,686 NA NA 4,531 1975 31,858 6,940 NA NA 4,630 (l) 197!>-79 Staff I!Btimote Decline -1.09\ annually a 367 persons per year. 1980 1980 Census 1981-84 Staff I!Btimote Growth Rate + .4\ annually a 139 persons per )'l!ar. L (2) Colorado llepaJ::tment of Labor -Research. 1980 latest available, 1972 -Arapahoe O>unty Data (A) City of l!l:lgl"""'>d only (B), 1980 census. (3) 1980 Census (4) Engl"""'>d Schools l (5) U.S. Department of Labor -Annual Averages, Denver/Boulder area available only. ~ • Not Available l L I I I • Indicator # 15 OEaT 8E"YtCE IJtC"9UIItf.._..t of •ttfr"Kt*tltM ... Ic:. 111 ~t .... , .. t etlertotffltN..,..l ------'t\t::'.~'"'"' 87 Indicator +16 OY[IJILAfJ~NC DEll 1"""'"'1"1-tof ... rh iiP i llf ,...,_u,. ••t u 1 peru•ugeof .............. , .. l\011 10" U?6 liU 19,. U,. lteO lMl IMl n•) I M4 • ~loyment Rate (5) 5.0 4.8 5.5 4.0 4.3 3.5 3.9 4.6 4.6 5 .6 0 I • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOO D COLORADO TABLE l4 PROPERTY WJ.UE, CONS'i'RlCTION, AKl !Wilt DEPOSITS ODDerc i al Res i dentia l Constri.IC't i on Construc:t i on Bani< P'i acal !Qnber -r Fi .cal Depos i ts (1 ) Year of ltlits Value of fll i ta Vlll ue Year (in thousarr:!s) ------------------l97S 16 20,500,855 21 us, 785 1975 167,916 1976 32 3, 016,131 122 2, 337,891 1976 181,710 1977 44 2,439,987 29 1,120,653 1977 210,633 1978 37 2,179,623 63 1 ,996,156 1978 222,381 1979 45 6, 989,526 30 1,034,800 1979 248,472 1980 55 8,187, 397 32 2,429,860 1980 259,443 1981 32 3, 325,722 177 10,631,964 1981 301,866 1982 46 6, 424,648 49 1,556,629 1982 314,039 1983 28 5,043, 749 70 5,382,887 1983 363,685 1984 43 15,271,029 296 5,104,344 1984 393,616 Source (1) &.lildir¥3 pemits issued regardi nrJ construction data; (2) Area banks regard i ng bank depos i ts Indicator #17 UWUNO£D fJ£NitON UAIILfTY ~ 1-.,...,,..,~tef a.~f.,..,...~tOII•l •n :.!:~!!!f !:-!'::rut~u,. •f ""'M4 nlwttlctft 88 Indicator #18 P'lNitON AII£TI IKrMst .. ••1• ef ,_.,.,. •'•••• .. u•••,.~u,.. ., .... ,u,,.,, ....... ,...,_...._~ • I • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD CO LORADO 1984 ASSESSm VMm.T I ON CP TEN LMGEST TAXP.\YDtS IN Tt1E CITY CP l!1liGLl'J«XD 1. Cirdel"lll!lrk • J\ssoc (Cirderella City) 2 . Mountain Bell 3. Public Service of Colorado 4. Welbourne Investment Co. (West Dartmouth Warehouses) 5. General Iron Works $ 8,651,863 4 , 778,100 2,478,960 2,165,192 1 ,894, 760 1,375,500 1,239,594 1,237 ,193 1,223,605 1,031,823 6. First Nati onal Banlc of Engl.....,OO 7. lllgo an:l Helen Olson (750 West Hanplen ) 8. Kintlerly4ioods-Denver, Ltd . 9. Wilkerson Corp. 10. Englewood Joslin's Store Source -Arapahoe Coun t y J\ssessor Indicator # 19 WIT[IIt rUND C& .. l OR LO&I£1 ~: C...'ttaftt~N rc::t!t ':11!,.,, Indicator #20 &[W[IIt rUIIIfD C.-eNI Otll LOII£1 un un ••n • .,. .. .,, 1110 ue1 .,., ueJ 1•4 89 I • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD CO LOR A DO ....... ..... _ ...... TABLE 16 M!s::EL!.ANrouS STAT!ST!C!U. DATA Date of Incorporation Date Hane Rule Olarter adop ad Form of Goverment Area -squar~ miles Hiles of s treets and alleys Streets Alleys Fire protection tbnber of stations -r of mployees -r of calls Po lice Protection -r of mployees tbrber of law violations Vehicular patrol unf ts llducation (School District No. 1) -r of schools (by type) NllfDer of teachers lbrber of students Water enterprise system ~r of users Average annual usage Plant capacity Sewer enterprises system -r of taps Plant capacity Mi. les of &ewier Bu ildi ng 1 :;5its 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 •I ncludes Bi-city sewer Plant Indicator #21 80LF COI.nll[ rUfrC) CA .. I CMt L.O&I[I Cpt ~ C..lhlet~t "'--'""'h' F:~!t!:;, ':!~j!n) ..................... ~ ._-=-""'::.:.~ • j\ . \ ,' \ -----------/:;_--\. ____ ~ / "'-! 90 Hoy 9, 1903 July 8, 1958 Counc i l-4'1onoger 6.52 116.93 39.5 4 70 2,925 102 21,516 35 2 high achools 2 midclle schools 5 el.......,tary achools 200 3 ,369 10,705 2,860,280,000 gallons 34 million gallons daily 38,522 26 mill i on gallons per day 70.94 -r Value 2B-;!I'1;881* 11,050 ,981 9,928,163 11,373,850 nw 2,659 2,523 2,532 2,401 2,282 2,242 2,687 2,039 2,693 16,177,940 l8,ll1,003 27,956,076 27,630,654 21 ,226 ,219 39,067,404 Indicator #22 c .. WUIIIIfl§llfiiO· OKl\1111"1 M' ... tth• ,..""""-" , .... , .. , "''"'' lf rufdl'flt l t l,c:-cftl ...-lllf111ttn•l ,.. • ...,.,J' (C:CHIUt llt .. lht~) • I • • .... - I • f • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO '"' .... .... .... ····I .... '5 .... , ,,., ! ... , .... TABLE 16 (<XllniNUID) Parks and recreation Parks -mmDer and acres Med ian stri ps -rumer and acres tbmer of swinmi ng pools -r of golf courses tbrtler of Sen ior Citizen Centers frblber of Recreati on Centers ltlp l~s as of Ileca!Oer 31, 1984 Career Service Systan Exenpt Total Popu lation 1980 census 1970 census 1960 census 1950 census 1940 census I ncane leve 1 average Current populati on estimate Retail sales 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Zoning classification by area 15 parks 120 acres 2 strlpa 2.00 acres 3 (2 i ndoor; 1 outdoor ) 1-18 holes 23 4.5 acres 1 1 461 32 m 30,021 33 ,695 33,398 16,869 9,609 21,700 30,577 415,039,940 526,301,456 634,542,155 666,160,630 787,275,493 851,190.240 1,039,463,227 1,199,841,675 1,341,143,271 1,534,226,610 Single fi!ID.ily residential 1\oo f..,ily residential l'l1l ti -f..,ily residential Res idential and professional Business Area in Acres \ of Total 46 .981 7.42 3 7.411 Industr i al le d y Annexed Not Zoned Local med ian heme value Financial institutions Cmrnercial banks, r'LI!iler of Bank deposits, 12-31-84 1 ,958 .36 309.4 30 8.918 32 .043 464.56 1,095.1 None 4,168.381 • 769 11.145 26.271 0 100.00\ s 65,300 Savings ' Loan Assoc iations , rutber of 6 $393,616,000 5 Indicator #24 Indicator #23 8111:011 M:C[Ifltl lt[TAIL lAlli Cl'l c•• lifMW!Ii T!(!p• IIKH•t•1 tfl lllltt .. " Hlhh111 ... 1Wr .. " ............ .. ..... "' . ... liM 'a .. ,. I .... .... ' .... ' .... .... ! 91 . ..... ,., ,..,. ., ........... .. ecu.,,,,,_, ..... .,. H\.111 .. ,.. • I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORAD O THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 92 • I J l l1 II I J r i 11 I • • - • • { I I L L L l [ [ [ [ [ l I • • ••• I . • • • • • • ~ ..... ~ .. ~ ~ .. . ... . . . .. I . • • - • • • • 1 0 " J BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO . ,fcJ SERIES OF 1985~~---COUNCIL BILL NO. 48 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER NElli AN OR DINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF S PECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS IN THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $856,000 OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, FOR PAVING DISTRICT NO . 30; PRES CRIBING THE FORM OF THE BONDS , AND PROV I DING FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE BONDS AND THE IN TEREST THEREON. WHER EAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood , Colorado, has, by Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1985, finally passed and adopted on May 20, 1985, created Paving Distric t No. 3 0 , wi thin the City , for the purpose of constructing and i nstall i ng street paving, c u rb and gutter and sidewalk improvements, t og ethe r with necessary incidentals on certain streets in the City; and WHEREAS, Notice to Contractors to submit bids for the construction of the improvements in the District has been advertised and bids for such construction we r e received on June 1 7 , 19 8 5 ; a nd WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that special assessment bonds of the City for the District should be issued in the a moun t of $856,000 for the payment of part o f such cons t ruct i o n c o s t; and l'lHE REAS , i n a ccordanc e wi t h t he City Char t e r and a resolution passed on May 20 , 19 8 5 , the City Council h as advertised for the sale of Special Assessment Bonds and said bonds in the amount of $856 ,000 have been awarded to Kirchner Moore & Company __________________ : and WHEREAS , it is now necessary to provide for the issuan ce of such bonds and the form and payment thereof; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. Authorization and Bond Details . That by virtue of and pursuant to the City Charter and the procedu re -43 - • I • - • • • - Section 1. Authorization and Bond Details. That by virtue of and pursuant to the City Charter and the procedure Ordinance of the City (Chapter 12 of the Municipal Code), Special Assessment Bonds of the City of Englewood for Paving District No. 30 (the "Bonds") shall be issued for the purpose of paying part of the costs of local improvements to be constructed and installed in the District. The Bonds shall be in the principal amount of $856,000, dated August 1, 1985, and be in the denomination of $1,000 each. The Bonds shall be issued only as fully registered bonds without coupons and shall be due and payable on August 1, 1996, subject to prior redemption in accordance with Section 3 hereof. The Bonds shall bear interest payable semiannually on each February 1 and August 1, commencing on February 1, 1986, as follows: Amount $301,000 R-1 145,000 R-30 2 120,000 R-447 85,000 R-567 85,000 R-652 60,000 R-737 60,000 R-797 Initial Bond Numbers to R-301, incl. to R-44 6, incl. to R-566, incl. to R-651, incl. to R-736, incl. to R-796, incl. to R-856, incl. "A" Interest Rate 6. 0 ' 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.25 8.5 In addition to the "A" interest rate indicated above, Bonds numbered ~ to R-856 inclusive, shall bear additional "B" interest for the period from August 1, 1985 to the dates indicated below, or to the redemption date of the Bond, whichever is the earlier date , such "B" interest being payable on the same dates as the "A" interest, during said period of time: Bond Numbers R-1 to R-856 Inclusive "B" Interest Rate 1. 625% -44 - • For Period To Aug. 1, 1986 I • • • • • • Such "B" interest shall be evidenced by an appropr iate i nstrument, which shall be fully registered. The maximum net effective interest rate authorized for this issue of Bonds shall be 14.00% per annum. The actual net effect i ve i nterest rate is~% per annum. Section 2. Payment of Bonds; Paying Agent and Bond Registrar, The principal of the Bonds is payable in lawful mon ey of the United States of America to the registered owner of each bond upon presentation at the principal office of The Fir st Nat i onal Bank of Englewood, in Englewood, Colorado, or its s uc c essor, as paying agent (the "Paying Agent"). Notwithstand inq anything contained in this Ordinance to the contrary, interest on any Bond is payable to the person in whose name such Bond is registered, at h i s address as i t appears on the regi strat i on b o o ks mainta i ned by or on behalf of the City by The First National Ba nk of Englewood, i n Englewood, Colorado, or its successor, as Bo nd Registrar (the "Bond Registrar"), at the close of business on t he fifteenth (15th) day of the calendar month next preceding ea ch interest payment date (the "Reco r d Date"), irrespect i ve of a ny transfe r o r exchan g e of s uch Bo nd su b sequent t o su ch Re cord Da te and p r ior t o s uch intere s t p ayment d ate. Such payment s ha ll b e paid by check or d raft o f the Payi n g Ag ent. Th e p rinc ipa l o f and i n t ere st on the Bo nds shall b e paid in accordanc e with te rms of a "Bond Pay i ng Age n t and Agreeme n t " b e t ween t he City and Th e Fi rst Na tio nal Englewood , in Engle wood , Colorado . Registra r Bank o f Section 3 . Prior Redemption . The Bonds are subject t o call and prior payment on any interest payment date, in direc t numerical order, upon payment of par and accrued interest . Notic e of such prior redemption will be given by the mailing a copy of the redemption notice by (postage prepaid) not less than 15 days prior for redemption , to the registered o wner of Bond Registrar b y first class ma il to the date fixe d redeemed at the address shown on the registration books maintaine d by or on behalf of the City by the Bond Registrar . Notice of prior redemption shall also be given by advertisement once a wee k each Bond to b e -4 5 - I • • • • • • • for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, in accordance with Section 31-25-536 C.R.s. Failure to give such notice by mailing to any Bondowner, or any defect therein, shall not affect the validity of any proceeding for the redemption of other Bonds. All Bonds so called for redemption will cease to bear interest after the specified redemption date, provided funds for their redemption are on deposit at the place of payment at that time. Section 4. Form and Execution of Bonds. The Bonds shall be signed with the facsimile or manual signature of the Mayor, sealed with a facsimile or manual impression of the seal of the City, attested and countersigned with the facsimile or manual signature of the Director of Finance, ex-officio City Clerk- Treasurer. Should any officer whose facsimile or manual signature appears on the Bonds cease to be such officer before delivery of the Bonds to the purchaser, such facsimile or manual signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes. The Bonds shall be in substantially the following form: -46 - • I • • No. R----- • • - [Form of Bond] [Front of Bond] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PAVING DISTRICT NO. 30 , SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BOND s __ _ "A" INTEREST RATE MATURITY DATE ORIGINAL ISSUE DAT E AUGUST 1, 1996 AUGUST 1, 198 5 REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS The City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, for value received, hereby promises to pay out of the special fund hereinafter designated, but not otherwise, to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, on the maturity date specified above, the principal amount specified above, and in like manner t o pay interest on such principal amount (computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months) from the interest payment date next preceding the date of registration and authentication of this Bond, unless this Bond is registered and authenticated prio r to February 1, 1986, in which event this Bond shall bear interest from August 1, 1985 , at the "A" interest rate per annum specified above, payable semiannually on February 1 and August 1 each year, commencing on February 1, 1986, until such principal amount is paid, unless this Bond shall have been previously called for redemption and payment shall have been duly provided for or made. In addition to the "A" interest rate set forth above, this Bond shall bear supplemental "B" interest, at the rate of annum, for the period from 1, 198_, to 198_, or to the redemption date of the Bond, whichever earlier date, payable on the same dates as the "A" interest said period of time. Such "B" interest shall be evidenced -47 - % per 1, is the during by one I • • • • • • or more separate instruments which shall be fully registered. The principal of this Bond is payable in lawful money of the United States of America to the registered owner upon presentation at The First National Bank of Englewood, in Englewood, Colorado, or its successor, as Paying Agent. Payment of each installment of interest shall be made to the registered owner hereof whose name shall appear on the registration books of the City maintained by or on behalf of the City by The First National Bank of Englewood, in Englewood, Colorado, or its successor, as Bond Registrar, at the close of business on the fifteenth (15th) day of the calendar month next preceding each interest payment date (the •Record Date•), an d shall be paid by check or draft of the Paying Agent mailed to such registered owner at his address as it appears on such registration books. REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO FURTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS BOND SET FORTH ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, WHICH FURTHER PROVISIO NS SHALL FOR ALL PURPOSES HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS IF FULLY SET FORT H IN THIS PLACE. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the author i zing Bond Ordinance until the certificate of authenticat ion hereon shall have been signed by the Bond Registrar. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the City of Englewood, Colorad o, has caused this Bond to be executed in its name with the facsimil e signature of the Mayor, sealed with a facsimile of the City seal, -48 - I • • ~ • • • • • attested and countersigned with the Director of Finance, ex-officio City the 1st day of August, 1985. facsimile signature of the Clerk-Treasurer, all as of (FACSIMILE S E A L ) ATTESTED AND COUNTERSIGNED: By: (Facsimile Signature) Director of Finance, ex- officio City Clerk-Treasurer CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO By: ____ ~(~F=a~c=s~i~m~i~l~e~=S~i·g~n~a~t~u~r~e~) __ _ Mayor [Form of Bond Registrar's Certificate of Authentication) CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds of the issue described in the within mentioned Bond Ordinance . Date of Registration and Authentication: The First National Bank of Englewood, Englewood, Colorado, as Bond Registrar By: ____ A~u~tLh~o~r~i~z~e~d~S"'i~g~n~a~t~o~r~y~---- -49 - • I . • • • • [Back of Bond) ADDI TIONAL PROVISIONS This Bond is one of a series aggregating Eight Hundred Fifty Six Thousand Dollars ($856,000) par value, all of like date, principal amount, maturity date, tenor, and effect except as to number , and interest rate, issued by the City of Englewood, in the County of Arapahoe and State of Colorado, for the purpos e of paying part of the costs of constructing and installing st reet paving , curb and gutter and sidewalk improvements, together with necessary incidentals, in Paving District No. 30, in the City of Englewood, Colorado. The Bond is issued under the Authority of the City Charter, the procedure Ordinance of the City ado pted pursuant to the City Charter (Chapter 12 of the Municipal Code) and the Ordinance authorizing the issuance of Bonds of the City duly adopted, approved, published and made a law of said City prior to the issuance hereof. Pursuant to Chapter 12 of the Municipal Code, such recital shall conclusively impart full compliance with all of the provisions thereof, and all bonds issued containing such recital shall be incontestable for any cause whatsoever after their delivery for value. It is he reby recited, certified, and warranted that all of the requirement s of law have been fully complied with by the proper officers in issuing this Bond. Payment of this Bond and the interest thereon shall be made from, and as security for such payment there is pledged , a special fund designated as "Paving District No. 30 Bond and Interest Fund", which Fund shall contain initially any moneys in the construction account remaininq after the cost of improveme nts has been paid in full and thereafte r to contain the proceeds f rom special assessme nts to be levied against the property incl uded within the Distri ct and specially benefited by the construc t ion and installation of improvements therein. The assessments to be levied will constitute a lien o n and against each lot or tract o f land in the respective amounts to be apportioned by an ordinan c e of the City . Pursuant to the City Charter , and the Ordinan ce -50 - I • • • • • • authorizing the issuance of this Bond, whenever four-fifth s {4 /5) of the Bonds of this issue have been paid and cancelled, and fo r any reason the remaining assessments are not paid in time to take up the final Bonds and interest thereon, then the City shall pay said Bonds when due and interest due thereon and reimburse itself by collecting the unpaid assessments due the District. It is hereby certified and recited that the tot al issue of Bonds of the City for the District, including this Bond, d oes not exceed the amount authorized by lawr that every requirement of law relating to the creation of Paving District No. 30 , the construction of said local improvements, and the issuance of this Bond has been fully complied with by the proper officers o f the City, and that all conditions required to exist and thing s required to be done precedent to and in the issuance of th is Bo nd to render the same lawful and valid, have happened, been properl y done and performed, and did exist in regular and due time, form, and manner, as required by law. This Bond does not constitute a debt or an indebte d n ess of the City of Englewood within the meaning of the City Cha rter , or any constitutional or statutory 1 imitation or provisi on, and shall not be considered or held to be a general obligation of the City. The payment of this Bond and the interest thereon i s not secured by an encumbrance, mortgage, or other pledge of property of the City except for such special assessments and other moneys pledged f o r the payment of Bonds, as set forth above. No pro pe r ty of the City, subject to such exception, shall be liable to be forfeited or taken in payment of the Bonds . For the payment of this Bond and the interest thereon, the City pledges to exercise all of its lawful corporate powers to collect the assessments. Bonds of this issue, of which this Bond is on e, are subject to call and prior payment on any interest payment dat e, in direct numerical order , upon payment of par and accrued interest. Notice of prior redemptio n shall be given by mailing a copy of the redemption notice not less than fifteen {15) days prior to the date fixed for redemption , to the registered owner of this Bond at -51 - • I • • • • • .. - the a d dress shown on the registration books maintained by the Bond Reg istrar, in the manner set forth in the authoriz i ng Bond Ord i nance. All Bonds called for redemption will cease to be ar i nterest after the specified redemption date, provided fund s for their re d emption are on deposit at the place of payment at that time. The City and the Bond Registrar shall no t be required to issue or transfer any Bonds: (1) during a peri o d beginning on t h e Record Date and ending at the close of business on the ensu ing interest payment date, or (2) during the period beginning on a ny d ate o f selection of Bonds to be redeemed and ending on the day on which the applicable notice of redemption is given. The Bo nd Re g istrar shall not be required to transfer any Bonds selected or call ed fo r redempt i on, in wh ole or in part. The City, the Pa y ing Agent, and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the registe red owner of any Bond as the absolute owner thereof for all pur pos es (whether or not suc h Bond shall be overdue) and any notice to the contrary shall not be binding upon the City, the Paying Agent, or the Bond Registrar. This Bond i s t ransferable by t he r e g istered o wner he r e of i n p er so n o r b y his a t torney d u ly author i zed in wr i t i n g , a t the prin cipal o ffice of the Bond Re g istrar, but o n l y in the manne r, s ub j e ct to the limitations, and upon payment of the cha rges provided in t h e autho r i zing Bo nd Ordi nan ce a nd upon surr e n d e r and cancellation o f th is Bon d . This Bo nd may be transferr ed u po n the registration books upon delivery to the Bond Reqistrar of this Bond, accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer in form and with guaranty of signature satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the owner of this Bond or his attorney-in-fact or legal representative, containing written instructions as to the details of the transfer of the Bond , along with the social security number or federal employer identification number of such transferee . In the event of the transfer of this Bond, the Bond Registrar shall enter the transfer of ownership in the registration books and shall authenticate and deliver in the name of the transferee or transferees a new fully registered Bond -52 - • I • • • • • • or Bonds of authorized denominations of the same maturity and interest rate for the aggregate principal amount which the registered owner is entitled to receive at the earlies t practicable time. The City shall pay for any transfer fee required by the Bond Registrar relating to the transfer of such Bond, but the City or the Bond Registrar may charge the owner of such Bond for any tax or other governmental charge required t o be paid with respect to such transfer. The sequential numbers s hall remain the same (i.e., R-1 will be reissued as R-lA, then R-l B, etc.) following each transfer of ownership. -53 - • I . • • • - [Form of Transfer] ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, assigns, and transfers unto SOCIAL SECURITY OR FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (Name and Address of Assignee) the with in Bond and does hereby irrevocably con stitute and appoint ~--~--~~----~~~~----~~~--~--~--~~------~~--~· attorney, to transfer said Bond on the books kept for registration thereof with full power of substitution 1n h premise s. Dated: __________________________________ __ Signature of Registered Owner: NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must correspond with the name of the registered owner as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever. Signature guaran teed: (Bank, Trust Company, or Firm) -54 - • I • • • • • UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PAVING DISTRICT NO. 30, SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BOND "B" INTEREST CERTIFICATE REGISTERED OWNER: The City of Englewood , Arapahoe County, Colorado (the "City"), hereby promises to pay to the registered owner named above, or registered assigns, the amount represented as "B" interest on the outstanding principal amount of the Special Assessment Bonds, of the City for Paving District No. 30, d ated August 1, 1985, issued in the principal amount of $ (the "Bonds") numbered at the rate of ._% per annum, for the period from , 19 , to , 19 , or to the redemption date of thesond or Bonds, whichever is theearlier date. The "B" interest shall be payable on the same dates as the "A" interest for each Bond, during said period of time. Such interest shall be computed on the basis of a 360-day year of twelve 30-day months, from the interest payment date next preceding the date of registration and authenticatio n of this Certificate , unless this Certificate is register ed an d authenticated prior to February 1, 1986, in which event th is Certificate shall represent interest from 19_, at the rate set forth above . The Bonds and the "B" interest thereon represented by this Certif icate have been authorized by an Ordinance finally passed and adopted by the City on July 15, 1985. The Bonds are issued as fully registered bonds, and mature, bear int erest, and are sub ject to redemption, all as specific ally set forth in the authorizing Bond Ordinance cited above. Notice o f prior redemption of the Bonds shall be given by The First National Bank of Englewood , in Englewood , Colorado (the "Bond Registrar"), by mailing a copy of the redemption notice, not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date fixed for r edemption , to the registered owner of this Certificate at the address shown on the registration books maintained by the Bond Re gistrar, as more particularly set forth in the Bond Ordinance . The "B" interest on said Bonds r ep resent ed by this Certificate shall be payable by the Bond Registrar to the registered owner hereof, at his ad dress as it appears on the registration books maintained by or on beha lf o f the City, at the close of bus iness on the Record Date , such date being the close of business on the fifteenth (15) day of the calendar month next preceding the interest paymen t date ; such payment shall be paid by check or draft of the Bond Registra r. -55 - • I • • • • • • • The Bond Registrar shall maintain the books of the City for the registration of ownership of each Bond and this "B" Interest Certificate, as provided by the Bond Ordinance authorizing the issuance of said Bonds. REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO FURTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS CERTIFICATE ATTACHED HERETO, WHICH FURTHER PROVISIONS SHALL FOR ALL PURPOSES HAVE THE SAME EFFECT AS IF FULLY SET FORTH IN THIS PLACE. This Certificate shall not be valid or become obliqatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under the Bond Ordinance authorizing this Certificate until the certificate of authentication hereon shall have been signed by the Bond Registrar. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado has caused this Certificate to be executed in its name with the manual or facsimile signature of the Mayor of the City, sealed with a manual or facsimile of the seal of the City, attested and countersigned with the manual or facsimile signature of the Director of Finance, ex-officio City Clerk-Treasurer, as of the 1st day of August, 1985. ( S E A L ATTESTED: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO By:(Manual or Facsimile Signature) By:(Manual or Facsimile Signature) Director of Finance, ex-officio Mayor City Clerk-Treasurer CERTIF ICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This "B" Interest Certificate is the instrument evidencing the "B" interest described in the within mentioned Bond Ordinance. Date of Registration and Authentication By: The First National Bank of Englewood Englewood, Colorado, as Bond Registrar Author1zed S1gnatory -56 - • I • • • • • ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS The City and the Bond Registrar shall not be required to issue or transfer any Certificate during a period beginning at the close of business on the fifteenth (15th) day of the calendar month next preceding any interest payment date and ending at the close of business on the interest payment date, The City, the Bond Registrar, and the Paying Agent may deem and treat t he registered owner hereof as the absolute owner hereof (whether or not this Certificate shall be overdue) for the purpose of receiving payment of or on account of the interest represented hereby and for all other purposes, and neither the City, the Bond Registrar, nor the Paying Agent shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. This Certificate is transferable by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing, at the principal office of the 9ond Registrar, but only in the manner, subject to the limitations, and upon payment of the charges provided herein, and upon surrender and cancellation of this Certificate. This Certificate may be trans fer red upon the registration books upon delivery to the Bond Registrar of the Certificate, accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in form and with guaranty of signature satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the owner of the Certificate to be transferred or his attorney-in-fact or legal representative, containing written instructions as to the details of the transfer of such Certificate, along with the social security number or federal employer identification number of such transferee. In all cases of the transfer of a Certificate, the Bond Registrar shall enter the transfer of ownership in the registration books and shall aut henticate and deliver in the name of the transfe ree or transfere es a new fully registered Certificate or Certificates of the same interest rate which the reg i stered owner i s e n t i t l e d to receive at the earliest prac t i cable time. The City o r Bond Re gi st r ar may charge the own e r o f this Cert i f ie ate fo r e very s u ch tra nsfer of a Ce rtif i cate a n am oun t suff i c i ent t o re imburse it for i t s r e ason a ble f e es and for any tax o r o ther governmenta l charge required to be paid with respect to such t rans f e r. -57 - • I . - • • • • • ASSIGNMENT FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned sells, as signs and transfers unto SOCIAL SECURITY OR FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDE NTIFICATION NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (Name and Address of Assignee) the within "B" Interest Certificate and does hereby i r r evocab l y constitute and appoint----------------~~------~----~--~~----~~ -:=----,-...-=----:------..,.-,---:----,.----:----:--::--' a t torn e y to trans f er sa i d Cert1 ficat e on the books kept for registration thereof with f ull power of substitution in the premises. Dated: ________________________ ___ Signature of Registered Owner : NOT ICE: Th e signature to this a ssig nme nt must correspond with the name o f the reg i stered owner as it appears upo n the face of t he within Ce rti f ica t e in every parti c ular, wi t hout alteration or enla rg ement or any change whatever . S ignature guaranteed: (Bank , Trust Co mp any, or Firm) -58 - • I • • • c • • • • Section 5. Authentication. No Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under this Ordinance unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond substantially in the form hereinabove set forth shall have been duly executed by the Bond Registrar, and such executed certificate of the Bond Registrar upon any such Bond shall be conclusive evidence that such Bond has been authenticated and delivered under this Ordinance. The Bond Registrar's certificate of authentication on any Bond shall be deemed to have been executed by it if signed by an authorized officer or signato ry of the Bond Registrar, but it shall not be necessary that the same officer or signatory sign the certificate of authentication on all of the Bonds issued hereunder. Section 6. Delivery of Bonds. Upon the adoption of this Ordi nance, the City shall execute the Bonds and deliver them to the Bond Registrar, and the Bond Registrar shall authenticate the Bonds and deliver them to the purchasers thereof as directe d by the City, and in accordance with a Bond Purchase Agreement between the City and -"-'K-=i-=r-=c""h""n~e"-r=-_H..;;.o_o..;;:r_e_&_c __ om-=-p_a_n-=y'---------- Section 7. Reg is tration and Transfer of Bonds1 Persons Tr ea te d as Owners. The Bond Re gis trar shall maintain the books of the City for the registration of o wnershi p of each Bond a s provided in this Ordinance. Bonds may be transferred upon the registration books upon delivery of the Bonds to the Bond Registrar, accompanied by a written instrument or instruments of transfer in form and with guaranty of signature satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the owner of the Bonds to be transferred or his attorney-in-fact or legal representative, containing written instructions as to the details of the transfer of such Bonds, along with the social security number or federal employer identification number of such transferee. No transfer of any Bond shall be effective until enter-ed on the registration books . In all cases of the transfer of a Bond, the Bond Registrar shall enter the transfer of ownership in the registration books and shall authenticate and deliver in the name -59 - • I • - c • • • - o f the transferee or transferees a new fully registered Bond or Bonds of authorized denominations of the same maturity and inte rest rate for the aggregate principal amount which the registered owner is entitled to receive at the earl iest prac ticable time in accordance with the provisions of this Ordinance. The City shall pay for any transfer fee required by the Bond Registrar relating to the transfer of any Bond, but the City or the Bond Registrar may charge the owner of a Bond for an y tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respe ct to such transfer. The City and Bond Registrar shall not be required to i ssue o r transfer any Bonds: (1) during a period beginning on the Record Date and ending at the close of business on the ensuing interest payment date, or (2) during the period beginning on any date of selection of Bonds to be redeemed and ending on the day on which the applicable notice of redemption is given. The Bond Registrar shall not be required to transfer any Bonds selected or called for redemption, in whole or in part. New Bonds delivered upon any transfer shall be valid special obligations of the City, evidenc i ng the same obligation as the Bonds surrender ed, shall be secured by this Ordinance, and shall be entitled to all of the security and benefits hereof to the same extent as the Bonds surrender ed . The City , the Paying Agent, and the Bond Registrar ma y deem and treat the registered owner of any Bond as the abso lute owner thereof for all purposes (whether or not such Bond shall be overdue), and any notice to the contrary shall not be binding u pon the City , the Paying Agent , or the Bond Registrar. Sec ti on 8. Destruction of Bonds. ~-Jhenever any out- standing Bond shall be delivered to the Bond cancellation pursuant to this Ordi nance and upon principal amount and interest represented thereby, outstandinq Bond shall be delivered to the Bond transfer pursuant to the provisions hereof, such Re gist rar payment of or wh enever Registrar Bond shall for the any for be cancelled and destroyed by the Bond Registrar ann counterparts of -60 - • I • c • • • - a certificate of destruction evidencing such destruction sha ll be furnished by the Bond Registrar to the City. Section 9. Lost Bonds. destroyed, or mutilated may be Regist rar in accordance with and applicable law. The applicant for Any Bond replaced subject any such that is lost, stolen, or paid by the Bond to the limitat i ons of replacement Bond shall post such security, pay such costs, and present such p r oof of ownership and loss as may be required by applicable law, or i n t he absence of specific requirements, as may be required by the Bond Registrar. Section 10. Disposition and Investment of Bo n d Proceeds. The Bonds shall be issued and sold for the purpo se of paying part of the costs and expenses of constructing and installing improveme nts in said District and all other cos ts and expenses incident thereto. In the event that all of the proceeds of the Bonds are not required to pay such costs and expenses, any rel'laining amount shall be paid into the bond fund for the pu rpose o f call inq in and paying the principal of and inte r est on the Bonds . Neither the original purchaser of the Bonds nor any subsequent o wn ers shall he responsible for the applicati on o r dispo sal by the Issuer or any of its officers of the funds de rived fro!'\ the sa le thereof . All or any portion of the Bond proc eeds ma y be temporarily invested or reinvested, pending such use, in securities or obligations which are lawful investments. It is hereby covenanted and agreed by the City that the tem pora ry investment or r einvestment of the original proceeds of the Bonds, or o f an y mon e ys treated as proceeds of the Bonds wit hin the mean i ng o f Section 103(c) of the Internal Revenue Code o f 1 954, as ame n d e d (the "Code"), and pertinent regulations, rulinqs , an d d ec i si ons, shall be of suc h nature and extent, for suc h period, and at s uch yield, that the Bonds shall not be or bec o me ar bitrage bonds wi thin the meaning of Section 103(c) of the Code and p e r ti n e nt regulations, rulings , and decisions . S ection 11. Incontestable Recital in Bo n ds . In a cco r dance wi th Sect i on 12-1-13 of the Municipal Code o f the City, -61 - I • • c • • • • each bond shall recite that it is issued under the Authority of the City Charter and the procedure ordinance or ordinances adopt ed pursuant to the City Charter: such recital shall conclusive ly impart full compliance with all of the provisions thereof, and all bonds issued containing such recital shall be incontestable fo r any cause whatsoever after their delivery for value. Section 12. Limitation of ~· In accordance wi t h Section 12-1-12 of Chapter 12 of the Municipal Code, any person filing with the City Council at the time of the hearing on the creation of the district a complaint, protest, or objection, sh all have the right, within thirty (30) days after the final passage of the ordinance creating the district or the ordinance authoriz ing the issuance of bonds, to commence an action or suit in any c ourt of competent jurisdiction to correct or set aside any determination by the City Council or questioning the authority o r proceedings taken by the City Council relating to the creation of the District, the issuance of bonds, the method of assessment, or the construction of improvements. Section 13. Pavinq District No. 30 Bond and Interest Fund. The Bonds and the interest thereon shall be payable sol ely from the local improvement fund, designated as the "Pav ing District No. 30 Bond and Interest Fund", which shall conta in initially any moneys in the construction account remaining af ter the cost of improvements has been paid in full and thereafter t o contain the proceeds from special assessments to be levied agai n st the property within the District and specially benefited by t he construction of improvements therein. When there is on hand a sufficient amount to pay six months' interest on outstandinq Bonds for the District, the City shall call for payment, on the next interest payment dat e, outstandinq Bonds in direct numerical order with funds availa ble therefor . After the expiration of the period for cash payments of assessments in full, the City shall, to the ext ent possible, pay each year not less than 10% of the total amount of -62 - • I • • c • • • - Bonds outstanding after the payment of the Bonds with the pr oceeds of such cash payments of assessments in full. Section 14. Additional Security for the Pavment of Principal and Interest. l?ursuant to the City Charter, when ever four-fifths (4/5) of the Bonds of this issue have been pai d and cancelled, and for any reason the remaining assessments are not paid in time to take up the final Bonds and interest thereon, then the City shall pay said Bonds when due and interest due the reon and reimburse itself by collecting the unpaid assessments due the District. Section 15. Assessment of Costs. Upon completio n o f the local im~;>rovements, or upon completion from time to time of any part thereof, and upon acceptance thereof by the Council, or whenever the total cost can be definitely ascertained, it will cause a statement showing the total cost of the improvements to be prepared and filed in the office of the Director of Finance. The City Council shall further cause assessments to be levied aga inst the property included within the District and specially bene fited by the construction and installation of such improvements, in accordance with law. Section 16. Repealer. All Ordinances or resolution s, or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 17. Severability. Should any one or more sections or provisions of this Ordinance be judicially determine d invalid or unenforceable, such determination shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining provisions hereof, the intention being that the various provisions hereof are severa ble. Section 18. Ordinance Irrepealable . After said Bonds are issued , this Ordinance shall be and remain irrepealable un t il said Bonds and the interest thereon shall have been fu lly p aid, satisfied and discharged . Section 19. Hearing. In accordance with Section 4 0 of the City Charter, the City Council shall hold a public hear inq on this ordinance, before final passaqe, at 7:30P.M. on '1onday, July 15, 1985. -63 - I • • - c • • • • Section 20. Publication and Effective Date. This Ordinance after its final passage, shall be numbered and recorded, and the adoption and publication shall be authenticated by the signature of the Mayor and the Director of Finance, ex-officio City Clerk-Treasurer, and by the Certificate of Publication. This · ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after publication following final passage . Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading the 1st ~ay of July, 1985. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 3rd day of July, 1985. Read by title and passed on final reading the 15th day of July, 1985. Published by title as Ordinance No. on the 17th day of July, 1985. , Series of 1985, Attest: Eugene L. Ot1s, Mayor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate, and complete copy of Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. Series of 1985 . Gary R. H1gbee -64 - I • • • r C 0 U N C I l DATE July 2 , 1985 • .. C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM ll~ SUBJECT Automatic Aid Agreement with Sheridan Fire Department INITIATED BY __ J __ a __ me_s __ B_r_o_m_a_n~·~F-~_·r_e __ C_h __ i_e_f ______________________________ ___ ACTION PROPOSED To approve an ordinance authorizing an intergovernmental ~reement for automatic aid between the City of Englewood and City of • Sheridan Fire Departments. The City of Englewood is currently operating under a standard mutual aid agreement with the City of Sheridan. In order to strengthen the capabili- ties of our department without in creasing costs, we have pursued the es - tablishment o f automatic aid agreements. We are currently successfully operating unde r automatic agreements with both Littleton and Cherry Hills Fire Departments. The automatic aid agreement allows us to use the closest fire companies on the fi rst alarm response, irregardless of their jurisdictio nal boundaries. Since its inception in 1981, this program has produced very f a vorable results . It is our de s i re to expand this program along our western limits in con- j unction with t he Sheridan Fire Department. Since January 1, 1985, Sheridan F ire h a s made some significant improvements in their staffing. They currently have three personnel on duty at all times and are now operating an advanced life support paramedic system that is compatible with o u r s ys t e m. The attached automatic aid agreement will allow us to enhance our fire response into the h i gh hazard industrial areas in the west and northwest s e ctio n s o f En glewood. It will also allow us to keep our distant station (Acom a ) in ser vi c e f or its own call demands. In exchange, we will pro- v i d e ladder comp any se rvice (the Snork e l) throughout the City of Sheri- dan. Because the S n o rkel i s h oused at Federal Station, it will be ideally located for th i s prog ram. Additionally , this agr eement provides for a joint program o f volunteer fi r e p erson n el . Sher i dan Fire Department will provide the bulk of the vol unteer traini n g , i n accordance with accepted standards, in exchange fo r t he u se of En glewo o d volunteer personnel in their responses. Engle- wood will then h ave access to both Englewood and Sheridan volunteer per-son nel for major or unusual incidents. ( I see this agreemen t a s an even exchange of services from which the city ~ of En glewood is certa in to benefit. I would recommend your favorable consideration of t h is item. ~-----------------------------------------------------------------------------·-- • • I • ( • ORDINAOCE NO. SERIES OF 198_5_ • • • BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUOCIL BILL NO. 46 INTRODOCY3BY COUtCIL MnmER '2 0-~ AN ORDINAOCE APPROVING MUTUAL AND Al1l'CMATIC AID AGREEMENT BE'IWEEN THE FIRE DEPAR'IMENTS OF THE CITY OF DG..&IOOD, COLORADO, AND THE CITY OF SHEIHDAN, COLORADO, FOR ONE TO AID THE OO'HER IN CASES OF GREAT EMERGEOCY WHICH CANNOT BE HANDLED SOLELY BY ONE FIRE DEPAR'IMENT. WHEREAS, both the City of Fnglewood and the City of Sleridan maintain a fire department consisting of regular and volunteer personnel and anergency equiiJnent; and WHEREAS, anergencies may arise in one jurisdiction or the other resulting in greater dEJIIands on manpower and equipnent than the one jurisdiction can handle alone; and WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of each jurisdiction to have the aid of the other when such anergencies arise; ~. 'mEREFORE, BE IT ORIA\INED BY THE CITY COUtCIL OF 'mE CITY OF DG..&IOOO, COLORADO: Section 1. '!bat the City Council hereby approved the agree- ment between the City of Fnglewood and the City of Sleridan entitled "ttltual and Autanatic Aid Agreanent," a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. '!bat the Mayor and ex officio City Clerk- Treasurer s1gn and attest said agreanent for and on behalf of the City Counc il and the City of Fnglewood. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th d ay of July, 1985. Published a s a Bi ll for an Ordinance o n the 17th day of July , 1985. Attest : fugene L. 0t1s, Mayor ex o ff1c 1o C1ty Clerk-Treasurer • I • • ,.. - • • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Gary R. Hlgbee • I • ( • • • • MUTUAL AND AUTOMATIC AID AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made b y and between the CITY OF SHERIDAN, hereinafter ca l led "Sherida n," and the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, hereinafter ca lled "Englewood," WITNESSETH THAT WHEREA S , Sheridan is a municipal corporation organized and exist i ng pur s uant to the statutes of the State of Colorado, and its terr i tor i al jurisdiction generally is the legal boundaries of the City of Sher i dan, Colorado ; and WHEREAS, Englewood i s a municipal corporation organized and existing pur s uant to Article XX of the Colorado Constitution, its Charter, a n d Ordinances , and its territorial jurisd icti on generally is the lega l boundaries of the City of Englewood, Colorado; and WHEREAS, each of the parties hereto maintains a fire depart- ment consisting of volunteer and paid personnel and emergency equipment; and WHEREAS, emergencie s may arise in one or the other of the jurisdictions of the parties resulting in greater demands than the manpower and equipment of that par ty can handle, or emergenc ies of such intens i ty may occur that they cannot be handled solely by the equ i pmen t of the party in whose jurisdiction the emergency occu rs ; and WHERE AS , i t is in the interest of each of the parties that it ha ve service o f and from the o ther party to aid and assist it in th e purpo se of f ig hting fires or responding to other emergencies; NO W, THEREFORE , IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the p a r ties as foll ow s : I . MUTUAL AID 1 . Areas i n S he ridan. For and in consideration of promises of Sher1dan , hereinafter set forth, Englewood agrees with S heridan that , i n the e vent there are fires or other emergencies in the territory served by Sheridan wh i ch are beyond the control of t he Fire Departme nt of Sheridan, whether because of use of Sheridan 's eq u ipment at other places or because of the intensity of the emergency , or ot herwise, Englewood agrees, subject to the limitation hereinaf ter set forth, to aid and assist Sheridan by 1 • I • ( ( • • • .. causing and permitting its Fire Department and its equ ipment to be used in responding to emergencies in the territorial area of Sheridan, and the need for such aid and assistance shall be det e r- mined by the Fire Department of Sheridan; subject, however, to the limitation that Engl e wood s hal l be excused from making its equip- ment and services available to Sheridan in the event of the prior need of the emergency equipment and the manpower within the terri- torial area of Englewood, or pr i or use of Englewood equipment and services at any place, which dec ision of availability shall be made by the Fire Department of Englewood, and which decision sh a ll be conclusive . 2 . Areas in Englewood. For and in consideration of the promises of Englewood , here1nafter set forth, Sheridan agrees with Englewood that in the event there are fires or other emer gen c ies in the territory served by Englewood which are beyond the control of the Englewood Fire Department, whether because of use of Englewood equipment at other places, or bec a use of the intensity of the emerg e n c y, or otherwise , Sheridan agrees, subject to t he limitation hereinafter set forth , to aid and assist Englewood by causing and permitting Sheridan Fire Depar tment and equipment to be used in responding to emergencies in the territorial area of Englewood, and the need for such aid and assistance shall be determined by the Englewood Fire Department; subject, however, to the limitation that Sheridan shall b e exc used from mak i ng its equipment or service available to Englewood in th e event of the prior need of the emergency equipmen t or need of the manpower within the territorial ar ea of Sheridan , or the prior use of Sheridan's equ ipment and services at any place , which decision of availability shal l be made by the Fire Depa r tment of Sheridan, and which decision shall b e conclus iv e. 3 . No Charge . The services rendered by on e party to the other are of equal value to the service rende red by the other party, and there shall be no charges made by the one party for the ser vices r endered to the other party , except that in the event of equipment damage by reason of the action of the employees of the other party , the lia bility and loss shall be determined on the basis of the f ult or negligence of any employee . If the employe e is determined to be at fault or negligent, the party employing that employee shall be liable for the loss. 4. Norma l Efficiency. Each party shall be expected to maintain its e quipment and organize its emergency response method with both manpo wer and equipment to the degree necessary to cope with the ordinary and routine emergencies arising within its bo undaries and for which the party is organized. Neither party shall expect the other to respond to emergency calls where the emergency arises due to a failure to organize available manpower or maintain eyuipment in proper working order and in sufficient qu antity to meet the respective demands of the persons and property within each of the p a rty's respective jurisdictions. 2 • I • • • • ,. • II . AUTOMATIC AID l. Area in Sheridan. It is understood and agreed that an Englewood Fire Department truck company unit will respond from the Fed eral Station into Sheridan's response area as part of the initial response through automatic dispatching by dispatch per- sonnel. Sheridan's response area includes the entire City of Sheridan . 2. Area in Englewood. It is understood and agreed th at a Sheridan Fire Department pumper unit or pumper and rescue un it will respond from the Ham il ton Station into Englewood's response area as part of the initial response through automatic dispatching by dis- patch personnel. Englewood's response area includes and is limited to all areas located West of and including South Jason Street between West Evans Avenue and West Oxford Avenue, which are wit hin the city limits of Englewood. III . VOLUNTEER PROGRAMS 1 . Ava i lability of Volunteers. The service of i ndiv iduals holding membersh i ps w1th either the Englewood Volunteer Fire Department or the Sh e ridan Fire Department, or both Departments, shall be available to both Englewood and Sheridan in times of emergency or as otherwise directed by the Chief of the Fire ( Departme nt of either Englewood or Sheridan. ( • 2. Training. Engl e wood volunteer firefighters will receive from the Sheridan Fire Department technical training in fire suppression and med ica l areas in accordance with current She ridan requirements, including specific training requirements of the State o f Colorado for certification. In order to maintain coordinat io n with Englewood 's paid firefighters, the Englewood volunteers will attend scheduled training with the Englewood p aid firefighters approximately once a month. This training may be applied to She ridan 's minimum training requirements. 3 . Protective Equipment . Members of the Englewood Volun teer Fire Department who also serve as volunteers on the Sheridan Fire Department shall be provided all necessary protective equipment by Engl e wood. 4. Pension Benefits. Members of the Englewood Volunt eer Fire Department who -arso-serve as volunteers on the Sheridan Fire Department shall continue to be entitled to pension benefits p aid by Englewood. Vo l unteers who terminate their membership with Engle wood a nd continue or transfer the ir memb ership with the Sheridan Fire Department may transfer their pension benefits to Sheridan only as permitted by the laws of the Stat e of Colorado. Such transferred pension benefits shall be administered in accord- ance with the ordinances of She rid an, the laws of the State of Colorado , and any policies now in effect or hereafter adopted. 3 • I • • • ( • • • • IV. OTHER PROVISIONS 1. Termination. Either party hereto may terminate this contract without cause upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other. 2. Administration. This agreement shall be administered pursuant to such wr1tten agreements as the Fire Chiefs of each party deem appropriate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement t h is day of , 1985. CITY OF SHERIDAN, COLORADO a mun i cipal corporation By By By Roger B. Rowland, Mayor A1leen F. Marple Commissioner Roger K. Steinberg, Chief APPROVED AS TO FORM: S her1dan C1ty At t orney 4 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO a municipal corporation By By Eugene L. Otis, Mayor Gary R. Hfgbee, ex-off1cio City Clerk-Treasurer APPROVED AS TO FORM: Englewood C1ty At~ney _____ _ • I • • C 0 U N C I L DATE Ju ly 1, 1985 • • - C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT Jib Maintenance of Traffic Signals INITIATED BY Kells Waggoner, Director of Public Works ACTION PROPOSED ______ A~p~p_r_ov_a_l __ o_f_c_o_n_t_ra_c_t __ w_i_th __ t_h_e_S_t_a_t_e_D_e~p_a_r_tm_e_n_t ________ __ of Highways BACKGROUND Senate Bill #8 provides that the State shall maintain, at State expense, all traffic control devices •n the State highway system within cities and incorporated towns. The State does not have the necessary equipment and manpower to do an adequate job, therefore, they contract with the municipality where the devices are located. DISCUSSION When cha nges occur that affect the contract, then an ordinance approving the new contract needs to be passe d. The same contract has been used for several years and the only changes have related to number of signals, mi le s of signi ng and striping or unit costs to the State. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Englewood asked for, and recei ved , a 10 % increase in the mainte nance cost for signals, etc. The amou nt for this contract has increased from a "not to exceed of $50,000" to a "not to exceed of $52,000." Monies received are based upon the number of signals and miles of striping, and for 1985 are pro jected at $46,668 . For this contract , which applies to 1986, the projection is $51,307. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the contract with the State Dep artme nt of Highways increasing the fees for maintenance of traffic co ntrol devices . I • • • ORDINAOCE NO. SERIES OF 198_5_ • • • BY A1.11'HORITY A BILL FOR COI.JOCIL BILL NO. 53 ~az~L AN ORDINAOCE APPROVING A COOI'RACT BE'IWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLI')>JOOO AND THE STATE OF COLORADO DEPAR'IMENT OF HIGIWAYS, DIVISION OF HIGIWAYS, COI'CERNING HAINTENAOCE OF TRAFFIC a:N!'ROL DEVICES ON STATE HIGIWAYS WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLl')>l()(){). WHEREAS, the Ci ty of Englewood is desirous of entering into a contract with the State Department of Highways, Division of Highways, which requires the City to maintain traffic control devices on state highways and to receive payment from the State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, the current contract supersedes the July 18, 1983 contract between the parties; NCM, THEREFORE, BE IT OROl\INED BY THE CITY COUOCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLI')>JOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. '!hat the contract between the City of Englewood, Colorado, and the Colorado State Department of Highways, Division of Highways, for the City's maintenance of traffic control devices on state highways within the City limits is hereby approved. A copy of sa i d contract is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Secti on 2. '!hat the Mayor and ex officio City Clerk- Tr e asurer are hereby aut horized to sign and attest sa i d contract for and on behalf o f the Ci t y Council and the City o f Englewood. Introduced , r ead in full , and passed on f i rst read i ng on the 15th day of July, 1985. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 17th day of July, 1985. Attest: Eug ene L. ot1s, Mayor ex-orf1c1o C1ty Clerk-Treas urer • I • • • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above aoo foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, aoo passed on first reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Gary R. Higbee • [ I . ( • • 0157V MAINTENANCE CONTRACT (SENATE BILL 8) • • • CONTRACT THlS CONTRACT, aacle tllis ---clay of ------• 19 __ , by and between tile State of Colorado for the use and benefit of THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHNAYS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, llereinafter referred to as the State, and CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, STATE OF COLORADO, llereinafter referred to as tile contractor, WHEREAS, authority exists in tile Law and Funcla have been buclqetecl , appropriated and otllerwise aacle ava i lable and a sufficient unencuaberecl balance thereof reaains available for payaent in Fund Nuaber 2001, G/L Account Number 52046, contract Encuabrance Nuaber 65800; and WHEREAS, requ i red approval, clearance and coordination llas been accoapliabecl froa and with appropriate agencies: and WHEREAS , tbia contract is executed under autllority of Sections 42 -4 -502 , 43 -l -106 , 43 -2-102 , 43 -2 -135 and 43-2 -144, C.R.S., sa aaenclecl and an applicable ordinance or resolution baa been duly pasaecl and adopted by the contractor , aarkecl Exhibit "A", attached hereto and aacle a part hereof : and WHEREAS. Section 43 -2 -135 (i ) C .R .S., aa aaencled provides that the St ate a hal l install , operate. a a i n t a i n and control at State expense all t ra f f ic co ntr o l de vices on t he s ta t e h i ghway ayatea , wi th i n c ities and incorporate d towns: and WHEREAS, the State d oes not have the neces sary equ i paent and aanpower to operate and aaintain the traffic co n tr o l dev ices : and WHEREAS, the contractor has adequate f a cilities to opera te and aaintain such traffic control devices. NOW. THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that: 1 . The co ntract dated July 18, 19 83, i s her e by s uper s eded and aer q ed into this contract . 2 0 The contractor shall provide the aa npow e r , equipaent and services necessary to operate a nd a ainta i n cert ai n I • • • • .. traffic control devices on state highways within the city liaita. as detecained and directed by the State. l. The contractor shall fro• time to tiae in consultation with and upon advice and approval of the State, provide the State with lists identifying the specific traffic control devices to be operated and aaintained by the contractor during the tara of this contract. 4. The rates to be charged by the contractor under thia agreeaent shall be as set forth in Exhibit •a•. attached hereto and aade a part hereof provided that the total chargee to be paid by the State during each fiscal year of the contract tera shall not exceed $52,000 . The ratea in Exhibit •a• ehall reaain constant throughout the tera of this contract and shall be subject to State audit at any tiae during noraal business hours. The contractor will bill the State aonthly according to the rates aa set forth in Exhibit •a•, and the State will pay such billa within 60 days. 5. The traffic control devices shall be aaintained in conforaance with applicable portions of the "Manual on Unifora Traffic control Devices• and the •colorado Suppleaent• thereto , referred to collectively ae the "Manual" and incorporated herein by reference. 6. The State reserves the right to deteraine tbe quality and adequacy of aa intenance under this contract. Any deficiencies will be brought to the attention of the contractor and a reasonable tiae will be allowed foe compliance. tn the event the contractor, for any reaaon, does not or cannot comply. the State ceaecves the right to do the work or have the work done by others and deduct the actual coat fcoa the subsequent payments to the contractor . 7 . The contractor will aainta i n both operational and coat recorda aa the parties hereto aay froa tiae to tiae agree upon ae being necessary to deteraine the adequacy of the control devices , both operationally and aechanically. to pectora their intended function . Said cecotdl lhall be available for rev iew by the state during noraal working hours. -2 - I • • - ( • • • • • 8 . The Di v i e i on of Hi ghways wi l l , through i ta District Engineer, be responsible for aon it oring this contract for the State. All correspond@nce and billings should be addressed to hia . The District Engineer 's address for this contract is: R, J. Brasher, 2000 So . Holly Street, Denver, CO 80222 . 9. This contract affiras the peraission granted to the contractor to aaintain the traffic control devicee pureuant to Section 42 -4-502(2), C.R .S., as aaended . 10. This contract shall reaain in effect until euch tiae •• the State or contractor desires to chanqe the ratee, •• ehown in Exhibit •s • or change the total charqGe ae ehown in paraqraph Wo. 4 whereupon this contract will be euperaeded and a new contract aiqned . Should chanqea in ratee be deeired, a revised Exhibit •s• shall be subaitted to the District Engineer by March l of the designated year . 11. The Special Provi sions which are attached hereto are aade a part of thie contract . -3 - • I • • - ( • • • • • IN WITNESS WHEREOF , ~he par~i ea here~o have cauaed the foreqoinq con~ract to be executed the day and year first above written . ATT!ST : Chief Clerk APPROVED: State Con t roller By ------------ ATT!ST : By -.---=-------City Cleek STATE OF COLORADO RICHARD D. LlUVI, GOVERNOR By =---~--~--~--------Executive Director · STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHMAYS DUANE WOODARD Attorney General By ---~~--~----LYNN OBERNY!R Firat Aaaiatant Attorney General Natural Resources Section CITY OF ENGL!IIOOD, COLORADO By ------------ Title -·- • I • • (1 .. ( • • • • LOCAL AGENCY RESOLUTION OR ORDINANCE TO BE ATTACHED TO EXECUTORY COPIES • I . • • - S P~CI4L PROVISIONS COI'mtOLLER'S 4PPROV4L I Thi1 cont r.ct lhall not be deemed \'llhd unt1 l11 ~II ~vc been approved by the C<Wroller of the S&Mr of Co&ondo or wch bSti&anl ll ht ml)' dntJNitC Tlu~ prOYI\IOft l!o ii~JCa blc tn I n)' COfllr¥1 tftY ~V InJ l.hc ~)'mctiC o( money by the SIMc FIJI\11 4Y.ULAIIU.rrv 2 Fu.nt.a obtiJ.IliON or cht S.. ~y~ afkr the CUI'TtT'C ft!al )Ut art COr'l.l~ YpOn rundl for 1hlt P'I'JOIC ..... IIPP'DPf'\*ld . budJC'U!d and CJtht""'IK medt IVII~bk 3 lfthtl contran m¥01~ 1ht po~yrntnt til' mu rc than fifty ttw:lu~nd dolllrs for the cOMfNCtion . uce1ion. ~"· rnaintm~M"C. or •mpro~,. of any butldmc . "*· bntJ,c. vladun. runnel , u cnat10n or ochtr pubhc wort: for tJtu S&Mr , lhr ~rv1or lohlll . bdcn cr.c:nna upon tht pr.rfOI'TNintt of a.ny \UCh worl. 1ntludc:d tn th u, coni rae~, dlil y uecvw: and dr:l iYU to Md file: •Mh the offtC'Ial whoo.c ~o~s narurc ~an bdow for the-Sutc. ;a cuoaJ ~nd wfflc ~~rnt bond or othtr ~ surety 10 be lfliP'O"''!d by uld ofTIC ... 1ft I penal Wm ....... k 11 than one-half Of 1~ ltlbl IIRIOUnl pl)'lbk by lJrw lC'flm of thiS CONrac1, Such baNI sh.IJ be duly t&CICVIOd b)' I quahfted corpontt Wrety. conditaoncd for the: d~ lind faithful pr:rfonnancc of the COIMract , Md ill edditioft , lohall prcwldr dw 1f tht con1ranor or h" wbroneracton fad tn dul) """" fnt any labor, mattnal1. am h1~. W~~e~WU , pr'O\'~. pr'O¥mdor or oo.rr MIJ'rl~ uw:d or roru.umcd by WK"h contrac1•or •If h•\ Mlbcontrxtor •n prrfonnant"t: of tht wort CONf'lltlcd 10 be dcMC , tht wmy wtll pi)' the: W~mc '"an amount not nceod•nc dw: \URI \f'Uifted 1n the bond, totf1hrr wnh lnttrftl M dw: rMr o( ap. per CCI'II per ennum Unttu Midi bond, when 10 reqwmd , u, ClCLUOO , drhvcrcd 1nd fiki.J. no r b1m 1n fa\<'01" o( lhr contr'IICIOr ariwfta ltMkr lh,~ rontract tihall br e\ldlled, aUowcd or r-Id A ctn&fiCid nr a-.h~tr \ check or 1 t.ni money order rNdt fM)'Ibk to tht be.wrn o( rht S.. o( Colorado N)' bt ~ 1A kN o( I boh:t MINIMUM W4GE 4. Eattpt as ofht"rwtw pronckd by t .. w . 1f t h" contrarl providn fOf tM p.~~ynwnt of MOft' than fiw thnuwnd dollan; and reti wtrn or l n vol ~ 1M t"nlpl oynw nt nf l:tborers o r nwr h•n•c~ in tht C'OMinK'tion . allt'ratton or "'~ir or any bwild ina or o thtr pwbhc •orit.. lt'U't'fH h•l hwa\ "· h•&h w1y hridlf''· undf'rpeswt; •nd .. iah••Y structuf'l'\ of ell lund\ I Wlt htn lhf Jf'OV8phiC'af l1 m1 fS Of t hf' Se:atf', lht riff' Of WIJt' for 11J J.aborrn 1nd nwch.an~ tmpfoyrcf It)' fhf' ront rKt or nt' any wbcontr»C tor on thf' bluldtnJ nr publiC wo rk cuwo"'d b y thi\ contract shalt bf' not tf'~~o~~o fh.n thf' prt'\' .. IIR J (Jff' of WIJn f(H' •nrk ur I )lmllar RlfUff' tn lhf' cifV, town , \'illaet (W Ofhrr ci\'il '"Ubdt¥tWoft or fht Scalf' in whte h t hf' b utldiAJ or othtr pwNtc. wo~ "luatf'd o.,pulf'\ "'~Clint prf'"-ilina rwtn rif k rnolvot4 as proYIIIIN in N-16-101 . CRS 1971 ." a~Mnckd DISCRIMI N4 TIO AND 4FFikM4 TI VE ~C TI ON S Tht con1rac10r llrtltl lO ctwnpty wnh tht lmtr and ~pmt of tht Colcndo An!ldtscr•nun.hon An o( 19S7, 11 arntnded ahd other Al'phc:abk law ~tnl dl~rlmlft.lll•lfl and unfillf t mploymtnl ptiC't tccs !24 ·34-402. CRS 197t ~).and" requuud by El tt\lll¥t Ordtr. Equal Oppon1.uNI\ and AflirTT\;all"t' Acuon. dated Apnl 16, 197' PufWMff dtnfto, lht followt'W pnm- """" WJI be ronutned ,. all SlMr contfk1~ ,., \Ub-('rltWrxh Durin& the: pt"rfo mu oc~ of th~ nNIIro~Ct thf' cun tract ur aJ,rt"n a!> follows : (I) Tht cuntr•tur win nuc dt'oC'·nntw .. tr aptn!.l any t mployet or appl k anl for nnploy,..nt Mc-auw of rae~. crnd. colut, ntlton~ n na:m ""' m.mtaJ \l l f u~~o , tt'hpon , ancntry , nwnt .. or phy.-11 handicap. or Ill' The runlrKior •,JI ••~ aftimuh\f' .K tiUn In m~urr I hal appl ic ants an f'mP'oyf'd . Md that f'tnployft'S '"' trntn.l dunn& rmplu) rrwnl "'11houl n-,;:.u.l to thr :a bovt mt'nhurwd c hararff'n~CK:l Suc-h IC'IHNII ~.U Hid *. but not blf' l1mtttd tu the: fullu •1111 tmpfu)nwnt. upcr~dmJ. dtmo11on . or l,.m-frr, '"'NtiMntl or rKI'\IIInwnl MhuiiJMft~ lay ofh ur t~nntna hun ~ rift\ o f pay or o thtr fonm. of cotftpt1Kih0ft. M4 Welton fOf tmntnJ. 1Adudma app~n l terlltur Thr contrxtor II'H" to JXKI •n cnnjpteuovs pltt'ft. ftliab&t to rmployett: and epphColR h fur c:mpluymrnt, nottet\ lu ~ provt dtd hy the: t'Ofttr.rttna orrll'ff JtUiftl fMh pro~t\Kfn l of fhjj, nun-dt-.cnmtnauun dausco . flj Tht contrxtur •lll . '" all ~~ooltc tl3ttom o r adverti'tC rntn ls for f'mployffl piKtd by or Oft behalf of the c-on tractor »ltlt' fhal .,, qu.ahflf'd <~jJpltca uh w.ll rrcetn con~~ot dt rJi m fl for tmploynwnt without rq.rd t o racr trrtd ctAur nlltunal u n¥1"· "4'\, man! .&I ~t a l us. rei Jpon, ancnlry , mrnlaf or ph ywal hlndinp, or • 0) Tht' tonlf'IC'Ior w•lt 'C'ttd lu t'aLh lilhllf uJuuu ur ttprtwo nlaflwf' of wo r\~trs wtth wh ic h he: has coll«tift birCIIOtnt lpt'f'mt'nl ur othtr runlr3l'l ur undt-"t:mdmx. JlUitC't" to bt prol>'i M-d by the: contrarli•l ofrttff, lchlltnJ lht ltbor unton ur """rf..•·n ' n:prr.~~otnU itn nf lhf' co ntractor's comnuflmc:nt un•r lhe Eurcut;.c: Order Eqwtl Opportuntry and Allinna!JVt Achon datt"d ApnJ 16 , 197 5, and of tfNo ndes., rqulaltont, and rdc:u.nt Ordt., of tht Go,rmor (~) Thr conti'ICior and labor umoth "'"II fum1sh :a.ll mfomul!on and n'poru rc:qui ~d by Executin On:lf'r, [qu:lll OpptHiun•ty and Affinn:.••~t> A~l•o••••f Apn.l 16 . 19 7~. and by lhf' ru les, n'1Uiat io ns1nd Orc:Wn: u f 1M C,m tmor o r pumt<tn t tht'"lu ""d "''II ptnntl .K'~t\\ to hti books, rteQrdi, and accounts by tht contrKiinl Al'f'nf )' 1nd lht ufr.ct" of the GuvtnJOr or h1~~o lk-"~~ fur putpUSf'S nf lftVHhption lo ..cc:rtlin c omphancc: wtth ~ch ruin, n',Uiahnn\ and urd~l') HJ A ltbor oraantuhon Willllol ndudt iln) tndiYWduaf othf'r'*llit qualtf~ from r .. u membmhtp nfus in w ch lebor uraantulton, or upd an y .!.Ut'h mdmdulf from mrmbt'Nup in Mteh labor CH'JiftiutMNI Of dttcnmtnllt 1pms t O) of 115 mt"mbt'n tn lht full rnJUynwnl of worif. opportu.Ury, bec:tuw o ( f'Kf, t'r'ftd, culur. W\, nauunal onpn , or anct\11')' (6' 4 l•bof o'1anJuhon, or lht" f'm ph.lft"e!io C.ll mtmbt~ th~rf'Of wtl l not etd , abtt, incl lt, cOMpel or t'Dnl'C thf' doma uf any act ck fi ned '" r h t~ contrKI t o bt th'Cnmtnetury nr obstruct or p~wnl M )' ptrscMI r""" rnm pl yma •11h tht pru\'1\Jttn!io ur th" cuntr~et or en y onJtor tuutd lh«-mt ndtt , or lffhltpl, ,;chc:f clerf'Ctl y or mdlf''tt'tly ,lo comm11 any act t:k fi ned 111 thn, tonlrac:t to be: diJc:ntNnalory. pa .. _,_.rj_p• ... • I • • - ( ( • • • • (7) In 1M .... , ol,.,.<•-•or·s --.:OMpl-. widldl< n-.lioc:--olllols--•• wid! _, ol-............. .-.or ....... dlis c•l,..l ""Y bo c...tlc4.-.! or_...._;, wtsalo or 1st poll Md 1M c-lot_,. bo dod•d loelitilll< lor lu...., SlaiO --1st occ--. with ,._.,.., •llloriud 1st Eaoculioo< a....~ Opportllllil)' Md Amr .. IM 4<1;. o1 April 16. 1975 Md 1M ............ ..-. or-.. prorrooolpled in ace-. ....,.wid!. Md----a -Y.,. ~-' ....-o • _,..,. .,....., •,........ irl heculiw Ordn. [.-J o,.n-il)' Md Am-lloo Acl-or April 16. 1915 ... by ............... ions, Of ................... ed .. --............... . ................... ..,. .... (I) 11w •--lor will ioocl .... 1M ,..,.n;o.. or,_.,.., (I) .......... (I) 1st....,._, _ _,, Md • .....,._.., ,-..-. ...... utmplrd by ruin ......... ioN. or..,... __ ,,. b<nlloo Ordn. E .... Opportuaicy Md Affinuc;.. Accioft ol April 16 . 1975 .so dool-,.-willloo blo4ina .. ,_ ~ .-.c.nctOf or wndor. 11M c011tr.ctor WI lab IUC'h a:tion witt. rn,«l te..,. wkoatncliwl 0< _...-. lhc eon-lin& -y moy di"'<l .• I lilt-or..,,_.,.,----. ioocl .... IMC..._ r. .....c.....,..._.; ........... h~r. thai in the nent the corMftldor .__. ... .....,ill, • II ... ....-widli, litiplioa widt dtt subtonlrw:tot or ~f'Hior aa a ft'llllt of~ 4inctioR lay the co.tnct-.: ..,_,, the c•tnct•IMY rt..,.. tilt St•te of Colorado to mkrinto IUCh lilirllt• to protect 1M i.Rinftt ollloo Slalo ol ColorMo. COLOaADO LA-PREFERENCE 6.-oll-11·101. A 102 . CllS 1973 for.,..,..._ ofColorodoloboror011pplicolllt lo lhil-n<lif pulllic-. wifhio 1M SUit ort .......... _.....,. tnd ... linoncrd in whalo or in poll by Slalt ru ..... GlNEIIAL 1. 11w lows or , ... Slolt ol Colnrodo >nd ruin _. ...... ,...,, itourd pu""onl 1hoft1o lhlll bt lpplitd in the iRierptfllfion, ntcutiotl ..d rnf~l of th.s conrnct Any pro-'tfott of thil HttfNCI wMtMr ot ftoC -...,..rfll ~in by ~f~nn which pro .. cW~ for arbtrrario" by any uc,.-judici.a body or pntot~ or Mtirh il ot...,.._ ift connict wilh said &.WI , ruiH and rql.llattoM shiM be coMidftord .... 1nd ¥Did . Nothiftc conllliM4 ift Ill)' ~" incorpon~d Mftoift by ~ftrt~ wluch pu'l")fts to rwt~tt this or •Y other speci-e proftsioft ift wMit or in ,ert sh.U bt waltd ur tnfora1b&t ur 1\'llillb&t in 1ny actiDfl 11 llw wMttwr by way of COtftPiei•t . drf'tntt or otMnwilt. Aft)' prcMMon rrndrml nufl and woid by tht optraliott of this pn»fttioft will 1101 iftftlidale tht NtMinder of lhis cofttrKI to tht nlrnt lhat llw contr.cl is capabk uf r.ec:utiun. 8. T'tw lii:Niorits heftto IW'tt' that they an familiar wilh 18-R-301 . rt wq .. (lribfty 1ttd Com.pf lnftwftCft) Md 11-8-401. <1 ooq .• (Abu,. nl ,ublic: Ofroe<t . C.R .S. 1971 . •• amtnd<d . and lh>lno •ioblion or rudl --is _. .. 9. Thf sienltorin ~rr thll IO thrif knowlt'dlf, no ~Uir tmplo)'ft Ju, any prnoul or brMrece.l iRtftftt whltiOIWt' in the ~ice or property de1tribed htrt-1n WHEREOF . tM part its hrrrto hnr utcuttd this A~:r«rnrnr on the d1y fim lbowc wriu STATE OF COLORADO RIC :HAHU ll. I.A!IUI. (;OVERNOR OE,ARTMENT --------~~-------------OF ------------~----------~ I • • (l ( • • • CITY or En9le wood DATE Novemb er 26, 1984 EXHIBIT •a• -RATES FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 1. Tr aff1c Signals* 138 .00 per signal per month 2 . Emergency Signals s per signal per month 3 . Sa11pling Stations s per sa11pler location per month 4 . Si gning s per mile per month s. Striping $ per mile per 1110nth 6 . Signing and Striping s 151.00 per •111 e per month • Maintenance of traffic sig nals includes painting of crosswalks and stop bars. tl-15 5/1/84 I • ' I • C 0 U N C 1 l DATE July 3, 19B5 • • • C 0 M M U N 1 C A T 1 0 N AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT Jl (!., 1504 Cottonwood Lane Clark Agreement Englewood Water and Sewer Board INITIATED BY Approv a l of the Qui t Clai m Deed, Reserva ti on of ACTION PROPOSED'----~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~------- Easement and Agreem ent betw ee n th e City of Englewood and Ri chard K. and June K. Cl ar k BACKGROUND The origi na l co nt r act between Banbury and the City was signed in 197B in lieu of li t i gation over the fact th e tank elevation was in violation of pre vi ou s agree men t s t hat were assigned to Mr. Banbury . Mr. Richard Clark i nhe rited , as s ucc e ssor in interest to Brooke Banbury, the agreement with the prop erty at 150 4 Cottonwood Lane. The agreement states that 1504 Cottonwood Lane cou l d us e the to p of the storage tank for a tennis cou r t. Wh ile t his was undesireab le, it was the least undesireable alternative at the tim e . The new owner has indicated a preference for other t en nis court arrang em ents. It would be mutually beneficial for the City to purch ase his agreement at this time. This would release the City from potential damages, liability and deter trespassing in the area. Th i s would also end Englewood's obligation with outside interests at th e s torage reservoir. FINANCIAL DETAILS Mr. Cla r k has indicated he would accept $12,000, enabling him to make ot her arrangements for tennis facilities, for the Quit Claim Deed , Res ervation of Easement and Agreement for the property behind 1504 Co ttonwood Lane. Adequate funds are available in the water ut ili t y wor ki ng capital. RECO MM ENDATIO N Cou nci l app rove the Quit Claim Deed, Reservation of Easement and Agr eemen t between the City of Englewood and Richard K. and June K. Clark for the amount of $12,000 . • I • • • RESOLUTION NO. ~ SEHIES OF 1985 • • • A RES0Ll1l'ION APPROVING QUIT CIAIH DEED, RESERVATION OF EASEMEm' AND AGREEMENI' BE"IWEEN THE CITY OF mG-~000 AND RICHARD K. AND JUNE K. ClARK AFFEX::TING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY com'AINING THE mG.&lOOD RESERVOIR AND amED BY THE CITY OF ~000. WHEREAS, on March 20, 1978, the City entered into an agree- ment with Rampart Investments Corporation and Brooke w. Banbury affecting certain real property owned by the City of Englewood; and WHEREAS, Richard K. Clark and .JWlE! K. Clark are successors in interest to Brooke w. Banbury in said agreaoent; and WHEREAS, said agreenent provided, in part, for an exclusive lease for a term of twenty years fran date of the agreement for a portion of the surface of the north part of Englewood Reservoir sufficient to build and allow access to a tennis court; and WHEREAS, the City desires to buy out the rights to said lease fran the Clarks; ~. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUOCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGL~OOD, COLORADO: Section 1. '!bat the doc~nent entitled "~it Claim Deed, Reservat1on of Easement and Agreement" between the City of Englewood and Richard K. and JWlE! K. Clark whereby the City pays Richard K. Clark and JWlE! K. Clark a lump sum of $12,000 for their exclusive lease of a portion of the surface of land containing Englewood Reservoir is hereby approved. A copy of said ~it Claim Deed, Reservation of Fasement and Agreenent is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. That the Mayor and ex officio City Clerk- Treasurer are authorized to sign and attest said ~it Claim Deed, Reservation of Easement and Agreanent for and on behalf of the City Council and the City of Englewood. APPROVED AND AOOPTEO this 15th day of July, 1985. Eugene L. 0t1s, Mayor Attest: ex oHicio city Clerk-Treasurer • I • ( • ( • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify the foregoing to be a canplete, accurate and correct copy of Resolution No. __ , Series of 1985. • [ I • • ( ( • • • • QUIT CLI>.IM DEED, RESEIWATION OF El\Sf}o!EN'J' AND AGREf}o!Etrr THIS AGREf}o!Em', made and entered into this day of , 1985, by and between the CITY OF ~ooo, a "Co;::;-l-=o=-ra=-d:;-o::-::m:-:un:=7l-::-cipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," and RICHARD K. CLI>.RK and JUNE K. ClARK, hereinafter referred to as "Clark," successors in interest to Brooke W. Banbury. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, City entered into an agreement dated March 20, 1978 with Rampart Invesbnents Corporation, a Colorado corporation, and Brooke W. Banbury affecting certain real property owned by the City o f Englewood; and WHEREAS, Richard K. Clark and June K. Clark have purchased the property at 1504 Cottonwood lane, Englewood, Co l orado and are successors in interest to Brooke w. Banb ury ; ar~ WHEREAS , that agreement provided, in part, for an exclusive lease for a term of twenty (20) years from date of the agreement of a portion of the surface of Englewood Reservoir north part suffi- cient to build and allow access to a tennis court; NOW, THEREFORE, it is the desire of Clark to quit claim to the City certain rights acquired pursuant to that March 20, 1978 agreement between the City and Rampart Investments Corporation and Brooke W. Banbury. 'Ihe parties do hereby mutually agree as fo llows: 1. City pays Clark the l~m~p s~m~ of 'lWelve 'Ihousand Dollars ($12 ,000) and Clark hereby sells and quit claims to the City all rights and privileges acqu ired by Clark by way of the March 10, 1978 agreement between the City and Rampart and Banbury, Clark reserving only a personal easement right for maintenance of landscaping the property located between the City's water tank and 1504 Cottonwood Lane. Said water tank is located on City property legal ly described as: A tract of land in the North 1/2 of SW 1/4 of ~~ 1/4 of Section 14, Township 5 South, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the SE corner of the North 1/2 of SW 1/4 of N-J 1/4 of said Section 14 , thence North along the East line of the No r th 1/2 of SW l/4 of Nrl 1/4 of s aid Section 14, 559.59 f eet , thence South 88o 48 ' We st 391.8 f eet ; t he nce South OCo 48 ' East 561.6 f eet to the South line of s aid North 1/2; thence North 88o 48' East 330.7 feet to t he point of hL~inning , Arapahoe County, Colorado • • I • • ( ( • • • • The: parties agree that the easanent shall be subject to the restrictions contained in this agreement. 2. 'Itlis easanent shall be personal to Clark; shall not be transferrable to their heirs or assigns; and shall remain in effect only so long as Clark owns the property at 1504 Cottonwood Lane, Qlglewood, Colorado, legally described as: Lot 9, except beginning at SE corner of said lot, thence SN 184.88 feet; thence N 90 feet; thence NE 157.52 feet; thence S 30 feet to beginning, Greenwood Highlands First Filing, Arapahoe County, Colorado. and complies with all terms and conditions hereof. 3. Clark agrees that the maintenance of the landscaping shall only be performed by canpetent persons and that such maintenance will not interfere with OWner-City's use of the property. 4. Clark agrees to hold the City harmless for any injury occurring by virtue of the use of this easanent and to release the City from all liability for any injury or damage which may occur as a result of their or their agents' use of this easement. 5. Clark will use reasonable care in the exercise of this easanent and shall keep the gate behind 1504 Cottonwood Lane locked at all times except when access for maintenance is required. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. Rlchard K. Clark June K. Clark CITY CF ~000, COLORADO 8¥~~--~~~~~---&lgene L. 0t1s, Mayor Attest: Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer • r I • • • C 0 U N C I L DATE July 9, 1985 • • • C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM lid SUBJECT Amendment to the Waste- water Pretreatment Ordinance INITIATED BY ________ E~n~g~l~e~w~oo~d~W~a~t~er~a~n~d_S~e~w~e~r_B~o~a~r~d~--------------------- ACTION PROPOSED, ______ A_P_P_r_o_va_l __ o_f_a_n __ o_r_d_in_a_n_c_e_A_m_e_n_d_i_ng~t_h_e_c_1_·t~y_'_s __________ _ Industrial Waste Pretreatment Program BACKGROUND Changes were necessary in the ex isting Pretreatment Ordinance to more accurately comply with Federal requirements and to recognize that a small portion of the Englewood sewer service area receives treatment from the Metropolitan Denver Sewage Dis pos al District #1 (Metro). The changes are in two categories: A. Errors or ommissions in the ori g inal ordinance found by the City, EPA and Metro staffs during their respective reviews of the ord i nan ce. B. Metropolitan Denver Se wage Disp osal Dis trict No. 1 was excluded from the original ordinance . In the amended ordinance all the powers that Metro must have in their service area are i ncl uded, but are limited to areas of the City served by Metro. FINANCIAL DETAILS None. RECOMMENDATION Council approval of the Ordinance amending the City's Industrial Waste Pretreatment Program. • I • • • • • - BY AtrrHORITY ORDINAOCE ~. SERIES OF 198'-=5---CXX!N::IL BILL ~. 27 =~f?YL~ A BILL FOR AN ORDINA!CE AMENDING TITLE YN, 011\PI'ER 5, I2G.Ewooo ~ICIPAL CXDE AS ENAC'l'Eo tDVD1BER 21, 1983, RmARDING EtG..DiOOO'S LEGAL Alm«>RIT! TO lMPLEMmr AND OPERATE A PRE'I'REA'IMEm'/INIXJSTRIAL WASTE CXltn'ROL PROGRAM, PURSUAtlr TO 'niE EPA'S CITIES' INDUSTRIAL ~E PRE'l'RFAT- KENT PROGRAM, CC>IUUX::TING AND CLARIFYING FORHutAS, AND OTHER AOOITIONS REQUIRED BY 'niE EPA. WHEREAS, Metropolitan Denver Sewage Disposal District No. 1 has reviewed the City of &lglewood' s authority to implanent and operate a pretreatment/industrial waste control program as it appears i n Title YN, Chapter 5, &lglewood MUnicipal Code '69, as . amended; and WHERFAS, Metropolitan Denver Sewage Disposal District No. 1 has determined it has insufficient legal authority Under Chapter 5 of Title XV, E.M.C., in several areas to protect itself and has requested several amendme nts thereto; ~. 'niEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CIT! COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~000, COLORADO, AS FOLJ..a.JS: Section 1. City Council hereby approves the following amendments : 15-5-1: GENERAL PROVISIONS (c) Definitions/Abbreviations Pm"l'RO DISTRICT. THE KETROPOLITAN DENVER SEWAGE DISPOSAL DISTRICT ~. 1, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION CF 'niE SI'ATE OF COLORADO. Publicly..Q.med Treatment Works (PO'IW). 'Jbe wastewater system owned by the City OR '1'HE KETRO DISTRICT. '!his definition includes any sewer that conveys wastewater to the PO'IW treatment plants, except private sewers. For the purposes of this Chapter, POTW sha ll also include any sewers that convey wastewater to the POTW from persons outside the POTW boundaries Who are by contract or agreement with the POTW actually users of the POTW. 1 • I • • - • • • - Significant Industrial User. Any industrial user of the City's wastewater treatment system whose flow (a) exceeds twenty-five thousand (25,000) gallons per day, or (b) exceeds five percent {5\) of the daily capacity of the treatment system, (c) is subject to a surcharge for excessive BOD, COD and/or TSS as provided for in this Chapter, {d) has toxic material in its waste stream in toxic amounts as defined in standards issued under section 307 (a) of the Act, or {e) is deteDilined by the Director, THE METRO DISTRICT, 'mE COLORADO DEPAR'IMEm' OF HFALTH OR THE U.S. ENVIRONMEm'AL PRO'l'E:TION AGEICY, to have significant impact, either singly or in combination with other contributing industries, on the treatment works such that the quality of the effluent, or sludges, fran the treatment works deviates fran the requiranents set forth in the NPDFS Permit issued to the City, OR THE METRO DISTRICT, or such that interference with the treatment process or facilities would result. Significant Violator. A person Who remains in non- canpliance with conditions of this Chapter forty-five (45) days after notification of such noncompliance and which is part of a pattern of noncompliance over a twelve~nth period, or which involves a failure to accurately report noncompliance, OR WHICH RESULTED IN THE PO'IW HAVING TO EXERCISE ITS EMERGE~Y AUTHORITY TO HALT OR PREVENT THE INDUSTRY'S DISCHARGE OF POLLliTANTS. THE CITY SHALL ANNUALLY PUBLISH IN THE ENGL~OOD SEm'INEL NDJSPAPER A LIST OF 'niE USERS WHICH WERE NOT IN C<MPLIAOCE WITH ANY PRETREA'IMENT REQUIIID'\Em'S OR STANDARDS AT LEAST ON.:E DURING THE 'IWELVE (12) PREVIOUS MONTHS. THE OOI'IFICATION SHALL ALSO SUI+1ARIZE ANY ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS TAKEN AGAINST USERS DURING THE SAME 'IWELVE ( 12) I'DNI'HS. 15-5-2: GENERAL REGULATIONS (I) Accidental Discharges Each user shall provide protection from accidental dis- charge of prohibited materials or other substances regulated herein. Facilities to prevent accidental discharge of prohibited materials shall be provided and maintained at the user's own cost and expense. In the case of an accidental discharge, it is the responsib il ity of the user to Unnediately notify the Director of Utilities and the PO'IW of the incident. IF THE DISCHARGE OCCURS TO THE PORTION OF THE PO'IW WHICH ULTIMATELY DISCHARGES TO THE METRO TREA'IMENT PLANT, METRO MUST ALSO BE NOTIFIED I.l'f1EDIATELY. 'nle notification s hal l incl ud e location of the discharge, type of waste, conc entration, volume, and corrective a ctions. Wi thin five (5) days following a n a ccidental discharge, the user shall submit t o the DU a d etai led ~itten report des ~ribing the cause of the 2 • I • • - • • • • discharge and the measures to be taken by the user to prevent similar future expense, loss, damage, or other liability which may be incurred as a result of damage to the POTW, fish kills, or any other damage to persons or property, and such user shall be liable therefor, nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fines, civil penalties, or other liability which may be imposed by this Ordinance or other applicable law. Failure to report accidental discharges may, in addition to any other r811edies, result in the revocation of the discharger's wastewater discharge pennit. If the POTW is fined by the State or Federal goverrments for violation of the POTW's NPDES Pecmit or violation of water Quality standards as the result of a spill or intentional slug discharge of a toxic pollutant, then the fine, including all POTW legal, sampling, analytical testing costs and any other related costs shall be charged to the responsible user. I«>TICE TO EMPLOYEES. A NOTICE SHALL BE PERHANEm'LY POSTED ON THE USER'S BULLETIN BOMD OR OI'HER PR~INENT PIACE ADVISING E"'PLOYEES WHCI1 TO CALL IN THE EVEm' OF AN ACX:IDENTAL DI&:HARGE. EMPLOYERS SHALL INSURE THAT ALL EMPLOYEES WHO HAY CAUSE OR SUFFER SUCH AN ACCIDENTAL DISCAARGE TO 0XUR ARE ADVISID OF THE EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE. 15-5-2: {c) Specific Prohibitions {1) (C) Any wastewater having a pH less than 5.0 or more than 9.0 unless the POTW is specifically designed to accannodate any such wastewater, or wastewater having any other corrosive property capable of causing damage or hazard to struc- tures, equipnent, and/or personnel of the POTW. {4) 1M Dkee~ ef Uhl4~M&T w.~ tiM ~-* '-Ae ~HeY~ ef Wils~t;e~ ~~He-...~..-y .-.. ~ a vuM~we Hall ~ PHYYMM ef t!R•s ~~ M 4iAHe PHHA& AJI'P*Y•R! le~ illleh a WI~W!Ree Mt a&eeNaRee wlo~ '-Ae HHs aM HfJWht:i•R& Pi&*•&Ae& 8y ~ ~He~~.... \lit~••Rees -Y lile eeR&Wei:aa IIA&a -.Ae leUew•A! fi~eiM!st;aReeS• (A ) ~&lllpHaRee wit;'R ~ PHR·&·~ tii&eka~e PHYi&i-eRs -wW Mlpe&e itR IIM~~E< kaftis'Rip eR ~ pe~&eR fi&eA.i~•A! wast;es ~ t;Ae ~t (B ) Aeee~aRee ef t;ke e+se'Raf'!!:! tiees RErt .Sye~&e*y af~t ~ ~- 3 • I • • • • (g) PO'JW' s Right of Revision Nil Y&eF &AiiU "-IHHtse 4iAe &e M pt:Ne&& -HF -., ~ aRy -yy M~~ M Hl-11~ • liHeM~ H • puUal H --~ 81i&&.,.IIM fet: ...... ~ ..._,_ IleA~ H MAHtYe tMI'II~MRee wKh My -.plie;UH.e ~ ... .._. THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGn' TO ESTABLISH BY ORDIIWCE HORE S'J'RINGEm' LIMITATIONS OR ~IIUMDn'S ON Dis- OiARGES 'ro 'l'HE P01W IF DEfMED NE0:SSARY TO CXMPLY WI'fti THE <mJ"!X:TIVES PRESEm'ID IN Brl'ION 15-5-1 B CF 'l'HIS ORDINAN:E. (p) LIMITS ON HL"l'RO DISTRICT AlmtORITY. ANY Al1l'HORITY OR RIGfTS GWll'ED TO METRO DISTRICT BY THIS ORDINNCE SHALL ONLY APPLY TO THOSE AREAS OF THE EIG..m400D Sm4ER SERVICE ARFA REX:EIVING S~ SERVICE FRQi METRO DISTRICT. 15-5-3: FEES AND CAARGES (d) If any water or wastes are discharged, or are proposed to be discharged to the public sewers, which waters contain the substances or possess the characteristics enumerated in Subsection 15-5-2(b) above and, in the judgment of the Director of Utilities, may have a deleterious effect upon the sewage works, processes, equipment or receiving waters, or which otherwise create a hazard to life or constitute a public nuisance, the Director shall also charge the following fees: Require payment to cover the added cost of handling and treating the wastes considered as "Industrial Wastes,• by imposing the following formula: s: • a-t,xa. 34 lOCo (AOO > + OCs (ss 300) 1. S: • surcharge in dollars and cents. pel' .... ~ QM & volume of sewage in million gallons per year discharged to the public sewer. 8.34 =conversion factor; one gallon o f water to pounds. UCo "' unit charge for AOD (additional oxygen demand) in dollars per pound. (i) unit cha rg e for BOD: $.0133. 4 • I • • • • (ii) if~ is less than 3.0, then A0Dc(BOD5-200 119/L) BODS if COO is greater than 3.0, then 1tCD&(C00-SOO 1119/L) BODS COO • chanical oxygen denand strength index in milligrams per liter (500 milligrams per liter or over). BODS • five day biochanical oxygen danand strength index in milligrams per liter (200 milligrams per liter . or over). u::s • unit charge for SS in dollars per pound. SS • suspended solids strength index in milligrams per liter (300 milligrams per liter or over). Unit charge for SS: $.0324. 200 c nonnal BODS strength in milligrams per liter. ~g 300 c nonnal SS strength in milligrams per liter. 4ijg 500 • nonnal COO strength in milligrams per liter. The application of the above fonnula ~ovides for a surcharge for BOD, CX>D and for ss. If the strength index of BOO, COO or ss is less than the base nlmlber that is being subtracted fran it, then there shall be no surcharge for that particular category, nor shall there be a credit given to the total surcharge. 1!>-5-5: INDUSTRIAL WAS'l'DlATER DI&:HARGE PERMITS (a) (2) (C) The ~oposed discharge would not result in a violation by the City OR THE METRO DISTRICT of the teons and conditions ..&: IN its NPDES Pennit. (a) (3) Permit Denial and Appeal (A) In the event an application for a wastewater discharge permit is denied, the Director of Utilities shall notify the applicant in writing of such denial. Su c h notification shall state the grounds for denial with that degree of specificity which wi ll inform the a ppl icant OF TH C MEhSURES OR ACTIONS WHICH MUST BE TAKEN BY THE APPLICANT prior to issuanct of a permit. 5 • I • • • • • • (c) Industrial Permits (l)(A) wastewater Quantity and Quality. Quality characteristics include, but are not limited to, those mentioned in Section 15-5-7 of this Chapter as detecnined by a reliable analytical laboratory; sampling aoo analysis ahall be perfoDIIed in accordance with procedures established by the EPA pursuant to .action iQ4~~t 30C(g) of the Act and contained in CO CFR, part 136, as amended. (d) Monitoring Facilities (1) The industrial user shall provide and operate, at its expense, monitoring equipnent and facilities sufficient to allow inspection, sampling and flow measurements of the .-1-Ya~ BUIIDING sewer AND/or internal drainage systems. ~ eee~~Ra~ ~~R ~~*&~A! ~a~R &y&~&T The monitoring facility should norm al l y be situated on the industrial user's prem ises , b ut the City may, when such a location would be impractical or cause undue hardship on the industrial user, allow the facility to be constructed in the public street or sidewalk area and located so that it wi ll not be obstructed by landscaping or parked vehicles. The facility should be capped with watertight lid and that facility shall not be located in street or gutter. (6) ANY USER H1\S 'DIE OPI'ION 'ro CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OR ANY PRIVATE ENTITY 'ro PROVIDE SOCH SERVICES AS DE&IED tm:ESSARY, IICLUDING, BlJI' tor tm:ESSARILY LIMITED 'ro, 'DIE FO~ING: 1) MONITORING FACILITIES 2) INSPr!'ION AND SAMPLING 3) LABORATORY ANT\LYSIS. ~ Inspection (e) (1) The Director of Utilities, ~ his representatives, OR REPRFSEm'ATIVES OF THE METRO DISTRICT may inspect the equipment and facilities o f any user a t any time during normal business hours to ascertain wh e ther the applicable ordinances, rules and regulations are being complied with. Persons or occupants of premises w!"lere wastewater is created or discha rged shall allow the Director of Ulilities or his representatives, OR REPRESENTATIVES OF THE 6 • I • • • • • • METRO DISTRICT, ready access at all reasonable times to all parts of the premises for the purpose of inspection, sampling, records examination, or the performcmce of other duties. 'Jhe PO'IW, METRO DISTRICT, State ard EPA shall have the right to Rt up on the user's property such devices as are necessary to corduct aampl ing inspection, canplianoe monitoring and/or metering cperations. ~re a user has 8eCUr i ty measures in force lllich would require proper identification and clearance before entry into their prardaes, the user .tw.ll make necessary arrangements with their lleCUrity guards so that upon presentation of suitable identi f ;c ation, personnel fran the PO'IW, METRO DISTR I 1', State, ard EPA will be peDDitted to enter, without delay, for the purposes of perfocning their specific responsibilities. ~t Failure to Fermi t Inspection {f) {lettering change only) ~t Sa.i!pling {g ) A},* ~~~ea&WHBeRtsT ~ts 7 AM -a*-yses H 4iAe 8RA~ae~i-sties ei wa~ ..W wastoes ~ •iel:l ~HAee ie JM8e MMi-R MilU lite tieHa~Red 1-R He&MaRee ~ ~aRiialfti MKRNs!!._ if! ~ ewtAli ~., Jlle &pee~a* Mfi*•Sy Ra& MeR iffMIWKeaT ~ p8loRl; ei HuipeeU•R IIRaU lite eeMMeMa ~ lite 4iAe 4iewR- MHNIII -Me*e i-R SA& 11'18*ie 118We~ -~-" M 4iAe pel-A" M wRMR 4iAe INU4.R! II8We§ H -RRHHa ~ ~ 11'18*ie ~ .. ALL ANALYSES SHALL BE PERl"'AHHD IN AOCORDo\lCE WITH PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED BY 'ftfE ADMINISTRATOR PORSUANI' 'ro SEX:TION 304 {g) OF 'DIE 1tCT AND CONTAINED IN 40 CFR, PART 136, AND AKENI:l1Em'S THERETO, OR WITH ANY O'nfER TEST PROCIDURS APPROVED BY 'DIE ADMINISTRA'roR. !W1PL ING SHALL BE PERFORMED I N liCX:ORIWCE WITH THE TPX:HNIQUES APPROVED BY THE ADM I NI STRATOR. 7 • I . • • • - +'t Confidential Information Provisions (h) (1) Information and data on an industrial user obtained fran reports, questionnaires, permit applications, permits and monitoring progrsns and fran inspections shall be available to the public or other governmental agency without restriction unless the user specifically requests and is able to danonstrate to the satisfaction of the Director of Utilities that the release of •uch infocnation would divulge info~tion, processes or methods of production entitled to protection as trade secrets of •uch user. tllen requested by such user furnishing a report, the portions of a report which might disclose trade secrets or eecret processes shall not be made available for inspection by the public but shall be made available upon written request to governmental agencies for uses related hereto, the NPDES pecnit, and/or the pretreatment requirements; provided, however, that such portions of a report shall be available for use by the State or any State agency in judicial review or enforcement proceedings involving the user furnishing the report. WAST&lATER CONSTITUENTS AND CHARACTERISTICS WILL NOT BE REx::OGHZEO AS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. Information accepted by the City as confidential shall not be transmitted to any governmental agency~ ~ ~~Y EXCEPTING THE METRO DISTRICT, OR 'ro THE GENERAL PUBLIC until and unless a ten (10) day written notification is given to the user by certified mail or personal service. (2) ALL REx::ORDS RElATING 'ro CXMPLlA!CE WITH PRE'TRFA'IMENT SI'AND.\RDS SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE 'ro CPFICIALS CF THE METRO DISTRICT, EPA, OR THE APPROVAL Atn'HORITY UPON IID;JUEST. ~t 'My a.ell!' hit& ~ ep4;i.eR -MR-II!'tte~ whA ~ ~~y H MY PII!'W~~ 8A~i-~y ~ Pll!'eYMe &li&A liiHYMe& H a-e8 Reee&&iUyy i-Aellilii-Aijy ltli~ M~ Aeee&&UUy 1-Mii,~ -T ~ ieU&W~Aijf lt M8R~sell!'i-Aij ~i,l+~i-es a!t iftspee~~&R aRB GiRphAij 6r ba»eii!'~~EY ARalys~s~ B • I • • • • • - +;t Deleg ation o f Authority (i) 'ftiE 11ETRO DISTRICT SHALL HIWE FULL Al11'HORITY TO ICT AND PERFORM SOCH FI.JN:TIONS AS ARE PROVIDED FOR IN ARTICLE IV <F 'ftiE SPOCIAL CONNfX::TOR AGREfMENJ' BE'IWEEN 'niE CITY AND ntE METRO DISTRICT. (j) REPoRTING REOUIREMEm'S FOR INDUSTRIAL USERS (1) NOTIFICATION REQUIRD1Dn'S. 'DIE DIROCTOR CF t1I'ILITIES SHALL NOTIFY ALL AFFOCTED INDUSTRIAL USERS CF 'DIE APPLICABLE REPORTING REQUIR!MENTS UNDER 40 CFR, SOCTION 403.12 <F 'niE FEDERAL GENERAL PRETRFA'IMfNI' RFG.IIATIONS FOR EXISTING AND NEW SOURCES. (2) BASELINE REPORT. WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS AFTER THE EFFOCTIVE Dll.TE OF 'DIE PRETREATMENT ORDINMCE OF THE CITY OF ~OOD, COLORADO, (ORDINAOCE NO. 54, SERIES OF 1983), ALL EXISTING SIGNIFICANT INDUS- TR I AL USERS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBI1IT A REPORT WH I CH CO NTAINS THE INFORMATION LISTED IN PARAGRAPHS (b) (1)-(7) OF SOCTION 403.12 OF THE FEDERAL GENERAL PRETRFJ.TMENT REGUIATIONS FOR EXISTING AND NEW SOURCES. NEl-l SIGNIFICANI' INDUSTRIAL USERS ARE REQUIRED TO SUIJiiT TO THE CITY A REPOR T WHICH CONTAINS 'DIE INFORMATION LISTED IN PARAGRAPHS (b) (1)-(5) OF SOCTION 403.12 OF THE FEDERAL GENERAL PRETRFATMENT REGUIATIONS FOR EXISTING AND NEW SOURCES. (3) WITHIN NINETY (90) DAYS l"'I.I.CMING THE Dll.TE FOR FINAL OOiPLIAN::E WITH APPLICABLE PRETREA'IMENT S'l'ANOMIDS OR, IN 'DIE CASE CF A lm'J SOURCE, l"'~ING CXJ+IEtCfMEm' OF 'niE INTROOUCTION CF ~TER INTO 'DIE PO'lW, ANY USER SUBJEX:T TO PRETRFA'IMfNI' STANOA.RDS AND RD;)UIRfMEm'S SHALL SUBMIT TO 'DIE DIROCTOR OF t1I'IL I TIES A REPOR T INDICATING THE NATURE AND CON::ENTRA TION OF ALL POLLUTAm'S IN THE DISCHARGE FR<Jol THE REGUlATED PROCESSES WHICH ARE LIMITED BY PRETREATMENT STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS, AND THE AVERAGE AND MhXIMUM Dll.ILY FLO.V FOR THOSE PROCESS UNITS IN THE USER'S FACILITY WHICH ARE LIMITED BY SUCH PRE - TREA'IMENT STANDT\RDS OR REQUIREMENTS. THE REPORT SHALL STATE WHETHER THE APPLICABLE PRETREATMENT STANDARDS OR REQUIREMENTS ARE BEING MET ON A CON S ISTEtiT BASIS AND, IF NOT , WHAT ADu iTIONhL O&M MP/OR PRETREATMENT IS NU::ESSARY TO BRING TH I: USE R INTO Co-1PLIAOCE WITH THE APPLICABLE PRETREA TMENT 9 • I • • • • • • • STAND.\RDS OR REQUIRfMEI'li'S. 'nilS STATEMEI'll' SHALL BE SIGNED BY AN At.rrHORIZED REPRESEI'li'ATIVE OF TliE INDUSTRIAL USER AND CERTIFIED TO BY A CUALIFIED PROFESSIONAL. (C) PERIODIC C01PLIA!CE REPORTS . a) ANY USER SUB.nX:T TO A PRE'l'REA"mENT S'I'ANDt\RD, AFTER 'DIE CCMPLIA!CE ~TE CF SOCH PRE'l'REA'lMENT STANDo\RD, OR, IN 'DIE CASE CF A NfW SOURCE, A1"TER CXJotmCEMENT CF 'DIE DI&:HARGE ltn'O THE P0'1W, SHALL SUB"! IT TO 'DIE DIR!r'l'OR CF tn'ILITIES DURING 'DIE HONTHS OF JUNE AND DEX::fMBER, tK.ESS lm;JUIRED K>RE FREQUENTLY IN THE PRE'l'REA'll1Em' STANDo\RD OR BY THE DI R!rTOR CF tn'ILITIES, A REPORT COVERING THE PRfX:EDING SIX (6) K>m'HS AND INDICATING THE IP.TURE AND COtCENTRATION OF I'OLLUTANI'S IN 'nfE EFFLUEm' WHICH ARE LIMITED BY SOCH PRETREA'IMENT STAND!I.RDS. IN ADDITION, THIS REPORT SHALL IN:LUDE A lm:ORD OF AVERAGE AND MAXIMUM lli'.ILY f'L(XoVS FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD FOR ALL REGULATED PROCESSES. AT THE DISCRETION OF THE DIREX::TOR OF t1I'ILITIES AND IN CONSIDERA- TION OF SOCH FACTORS AS LOCAL HIGf OR IDJ n.ow RATES, HOLI!lr\YS, BUDGET cYCLES, E'I\:., THE DIREX:TOR OF tn'ILITIES MAY AGREE TO ALTER THE P«>NTHS DURING WHICH THE ABOVE REPORTS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED. b) THE DIREX::TOR OF tn'ILITIES MAY IMPOSE MASS LIMITATIONS ON USERS WHICH ARE USING DILtn'ION TO MEET APPLICABLE PRE'l'REA"mENT STANDMDS OR REQUIRfMEm'S, OR IN OTHER CASFS WHERE THE IMPOSITION OF 111\SS LIMITATIONS ARE APPROPRIATE. IN SOCH CASES, THE REPORT RD;)UIRED BY SUB- PARAGRAPH a) OF THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL INDICATE THE MASS CF POW11'ANI'S Rm.JIATED BY PRETREAT- MENT STAN!WIDS IN THE EFFLUENT OF THE USER. THESE REPORTS SHALL CONTAIN THE RESULTS OF SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF THE DISCHARGE, INCLUDING THE FLCJr;l AND THE NAT'JRE AND COOCEN- TRATION, OR PRODtx:TION AND MASS WHERE Rf)JUESTED BY THE DIREX:TOR OF t1I'ILITIES OF I'OLLt1I'ANI'S CONTAINED THEREIN WHICH ARE LIMITED BY THE APPLICABLE PRETREA'IMEI'tl' STANDARDS. ALL ANALYSES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCOR!lr\NCE WITH PROCEDURES ESTABLISHED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR PURSUAIIT TO SECTION 304 (g) OF THE ACT AND CON- TAINED IN 40 CFH, PART 136 AND A"1ENDMEt.J'I'S 10 • I • • f • • • • THERETO OR WITH ANY OI'HER TEST PROCEDURES APPROVED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR. &.MPLING SHALL BE PERFORHEO IN ~E WITH THE TD:HNIQUES APPROVED BY THE AIX'IINISTRATOR. lS..s-6: ENFORC!MENT AND PENALTIES (d) Suspension of Service 1!>-5-7: 'lhe City may suspend the wastewater treatment 11ervice and/or a Wastewater Discharge Femi t when such suspension is necessary, in the opinion of the Directo~ of utili ties and/or Director of Wastewater Treatment in order to stop an actual or threatened discharge which presents or may present an imninent or substantial endangerment to the health or welfare of persons, to the enviroBnent, causes interference to the PO'JW, or causes the PO'lW OR THE METRO DISTRICT to violate any condition of its NPDES Femit. Any person notified of suspension of the wastewater threatment service and/or the wastewater discharge permit shall Unnediately stop or eliminate the discharge. In the event of a failure of the user to comply voluntarily with the suspension order, the Director of Utilities may take such steps as deemed necessary, including imnediate severance of the sewer connection, to prevent or mintmize damage to the PO'lW or endangerment to any individuals. 'lhe Director of Utilities shall reinstate the wastewater discharge permit and/or the wastewater treatment service upon proof of the eltmination of the noncomplying discharge. 'lhe user shall pay all PO'lW costs and expenses for any such suspension and restoration of service. A detailed written stat.anent subnitted by the user describing the causes of the hamful contributiion and the measures taken to prevent any future occurrence shall be subnitted to the Director of utilities within fifteen (15) days of the date of occurrence. LIMITATIONS ON DISCHARGE (A) Pollutant or Pollutant Property Haxtmlnl Concentration, mg/1 Grab Sample Compos ite Sample Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD ) pH, miniml.nl maxtmtrr. 11 • 4.§ s.o 9.0 ~(I 500 I • - • f ' • • • • Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Publiahed as a Bill for an ~dinance on the 17th day of JUly, 1985. Eijene L. Ohs, Mliyor Attest: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of lbglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Gary R. Higbee 12 • I • - • • • - C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE .Tune 26 19B5 AGENDA 'ITEM lit.- SUBJECT Proposed Amendments to the Com- prehensive Zoning Ordinance, §16.4-12 B-2 Business Distri ct INITIATED BY City Planning and Zoning Commission ACT I ON PROPOSED Receive the recommcndat ion of the Planning Commission relative to certain amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, and request the City Attornev to oreoare Ordinances in orenaration of a Public Hearin2. INTROD UCTION AND BACKGROUND: At the request of the City Council, the Planning Commission has reviewe d the B-2, Business District regulations to determi ne whether or not they impose adequate re- quirements for new and used car sales lots to minimize the negative impact of those businesses on adjacent residential areas and to reverse th e appearance of deteri o ration that is intruding into the B-2 Zone District, most especially alo n g South Broadway . The Commission members have given considerable thought t o t his issue, includin g the testimony received at the Public Hearing, statements made by car dealers at suhse- qu en t p ublic meetings , information ob tained from commercial insurers, and from ot her jurisdictions and the staff report, al l of which has formed the basis for their de- cisio n. Members have also driven the Broadway area, paying particular attention t o dev elopment along its length, and several members have driven through other jurisdic- tions to com pare the development along South Broadway in Englewo od with that in Denver, Lakew ood, Aurora , and Littleton. Th e Planning Commission members concluded that all automobile-related busin esses c an have similar effect upon adjacent u ses for the following reasons: --The uses typically generate a fairly h i gh v o lume of traffic from customers and employees and usually r ely upon adjac nt streets for parking. --The layout of the property and the structur s have quite often been desi~ned for other u es and do not adequatel y accommodate the aut o -rel ated u se . --The lots are not always properly designed and surfaced t o accommod ate runo ff from wushing the cars, and th e water pond in the alley s . --Tiw us of the ca r sales lots is typically m ximized with inadequat e r N>. for em rg nc · arce s and maneuvering o f tnv ntory witho ut using adjacent rtrh t-of-way. --TI1e own er /nprratnrs have not made on ffort to comply with minimal land ~rap lnr rl·quir,·ml'n t5 and h£> usN; d£>l ract fr c>r•. rath r t •~nn furthct·in~, l hl' dL" J rptl imn l.,l t n 1 • c r £>a tc d al nng Sou h ll roaJ ... ',,i , whi c'• I ~ u •l f ot t h in t h <· t'<•mpt. 1 • n- s i vt' 1'1 a • I • - • • • • • -2- With th ese issues in mind, the Planning Commission is of the opinion that all auto- mob ile/vehi cle related uses should be permitted only as a Conditional Use in the B-2 Business District. Automobile car laundries and polishing businesses and motor re- pair business es have been Conditional Uses for some time. The Commission would recom- mend that sales lots and filling stations also be permitted only as a Conditional Use. In this wa y , each specific automobile/vehicle-related business will be considered at a specific lo cation and any foreseen or anticipated problems can be addressed and res o lved before the use is approved. The provisions would apply to all new sales lots and up o n a c hang e of ownership for any sales lot or business after the effective date of the Ordinan ce . If the sales lot approved as a Conditional Use were to be sold, th e new owner would have to reaffirm compliance with any conditions imposed at the time of th e initial approval. To this end, the f ollowing sections of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance would be repealed: §16 .4-12 c (4) Automobile sales or lease not including commercial vehicle wrecking, dismantling or junk yards, §16.4-2 c (8) Gasoline and oil service stations, §16.4-12 c (10) Motor vehicle sales or leas e , §16.4-12 c (14) Recreational vehicle sales or lease to include boats, trailer, motorcycles and other recreational ve h icle~. A new §16.4-12 e (2) Sales lots for new and used automobiles, mo tor veh icles, recre- ational vehicles, boats, trailers, or mot orcycles , and §16.4-12 e (3) Automobile service stations, wou ld be adopted. Section 16.4-12 e (2)(b) and (c) set forth information to be provided with the site plan at the time of application for the sales lot Conditional Use and the ma tters to be specifically considered by the Com- mission when revi ewi ng t he site plan. Section 16.4-12 e (3) also cites specific criteria for s ervice stations. There are some issues which the Planning Commission f eels should apply t o all businesses in the B-2 Zone District , not just to sales lots. These includ e re- stric tions relative to fencing a long street frontages, the percent of landscaping to be in the front of the lot and setbacks. As to fencing and landscaping, the Commission members are of the opinion that any amendments should be addressed in §16.4-17, Fences and Retainin g Walls, and §16.4-18 Landscape Ordinance, as they would app ly to all businesses rather than in the B-2 Zone District as they would apply to one specific use . The Commissio n has initiated these changes and wil l con- sider them at Public Hearing. As to setbacks, the Commission would recommend that a new section, §16 .4-12 9 (2) Setbacks, sub-sections (a) and (b) be added, which would require a minimum setback for any buildings of 10 feet on non-corner lots and a minimum setback of five (5) f eet for the first 100 feet from the corner on a corner lot, and 10 feet for any frontage in excess of the 100 f et. Becaus e the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance already includes requirements for the sur- facing of sales lots, minimum off-street parking requirements and sign age , the Com- mission members did not feel it was necessary to address th ose issues specifically in th e B-2 regulations r lative to sales lots. To do so could create a point of conflict between the diff rent sections and make enforcement difficult. The Planning Commission considered th • attached revision of the B-2 Business District at a Puhlic Hearing h ld on May 14, 1985, and at two subsequent meetings, and have vot d to send th proposed amendments to the B-2 Business District regulation~ t o t loc City Counc I 1 f or its co nsideration . • I • • - • • • • t' • -3- Th e Findings of Fact were considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting on June 18, 1985, and it was the decision of the Commission that these Findings of Fact should also be accepted and referred to City Council. RECOMMENDATION: After giving careful consideration to the drafting of the proposed amendments to the B-2 Zone District regulations, and after considering the proposed regulations at a public hearing and at two subsequent regularly scheduled meetings, it is the opinion of the Commission that the City Council should give consideration to the proposed amendments to the B-2 Business Zone District regulations. The members of the Commis- sion further recommend that the City Attorney be requested to prepare an ordinance for the proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, and that a Public Hearing be scheduled to consider the proposed amendments to §16.4-12 of the Compre- hensive Zoning Ordinance. ATTACHMENTS: 1. The B-2 Zone District regulations as proposed to be amended. 2 . The Findings of Fact for the June 18, 1985 meeting. 3. The Minutes of the June 4 meeting. 4. A memorandum to the Commission regarding regulations from other communities. 5. The Findings of Fact for the May 14, 1985 Public Hearing. 6. The Minutes of the May 14, 1985 meeting. 7. The Minutes of the May 7, 1985 meeting. 8. The Minutes of the April 16, ·1985 meeting. 9. Memo dated April 8, 1985 from Peter Var~as to the Planning Commission, with attached memo from D. A. Romans to Peter Vargas (complete). THIS COUNCIL COMMUNICATION WAS PREVIOUSLY SENT IN THE JULY 1, 1985 CITY COUNCIL PACKET, ITEM 11 (a). PLEASE REFER TO THAT PACKET FOR COPIES OF ATTACHMENTS. SUGGESTED ACTION: MOVED BY ___________________________ ___ SECOND ________________ _ YES _____________ NO _____________ ~ABSENT ____________________ _ • I • • • ORDINAOCE 00. SERIES OF 198_5_ • • - BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 50 INTROOOCED BY COI.JOCIL ~ER __________ __ AN OROINAOCE AMENDING THE C01PREHENSIVE ZONING OROINAOCE OF THE CITY OF ENGI.Elr.'OOD, COLORADO, BY REPEALING SEX:TIONS 16.4-12 c (4) AUTOMOBILE SALES OR LEASE NOT IOCLUDING C~IAL VEHICLE WRD:K- ING, DISMANTLING OR JUN K YARDS; 16.4-12 c (8) GASOLINE AND OIL SERVICE STATIONS; 16.4-12 c (10) MOTOR VEHICLE SALES OR LEASE; 16.4-2 c (14 ) REX:REATIONAL VEHICLE SALES OR LEASE ro IOCLUDE BOATS, TRAILERS, MOTORCYCLES AND OTHE R REX:REATIONAL VEHICLES; AND ADDING NEl'l SEX:TIONS 16.4-12 e (2) SALES LOTS FOR NEl'J AND USED AU'I'Ct100ILES, MCY.l'OR VEHICLES, REX:REATIONAL VEHICLES, BOATS, TRAILERS, OR MOTOR- CYCLES; AND 16.4-12 e (3 ) A~OBILE SERVICE STATIONS AND ADDING SOCTION 16.4-12 g (2) DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS, SETBACKS. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Carrnission has reviewed the B-2 Zone Di strict regulations to determine whether or not that section of the COmprehensive Zoning Ordinance adequately reflects the goals o f the City as set forth in the COmprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Carrnission has considered the B-2 Zone District a t public hearing on May 14, 1985 and announced a study session for May 21, 1985; and WH EREAS, at sa i d study sess i on, only one person (a car lot owne r ) spoke ; and WHEREAS, at the study session of May 21, 1985, it was announced there would be further discussion on the B-2 Zone District on June 4, 1985 Planning and Zoning Commis s ion meeting; and WH EREAS , a t the June 4, 1985 discussion, three car lot dealers were pres ent , had been pr esent at the Ma y 14 publ i c hearing, but did not address t he Comm iss ion on the B-2 Zone Distric t matter; and WHEREAS, after said public hearing , study session and d i scuss i on, the recommendation of the City Planning and Zoning Commiss i on to the City Council is that the p~oposed revisions to the COmprehensive Zoning Ordinance be adopted; NOd , THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUOC I L OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: 1 • I • • • • • Section 1. That the following sections of the Gamprehensive Zoning Ordinance be repealed: *' ... -441!-e-Ht Aw\\1111e&He &aleG el' *ease Re\\ ~llllii-~ sa a tet:sHl wki-e*e WI!@Cki-R~J,. fi-u•~ el' ;wtk yal74i&-. *'·.f-li!-e-.f8t ~i-Ae iiLAii eU &et:~ 8\\a\;i-eR&-. *' ... -4-*i!-e-.fHt Aeet:ea\\i-eRal YE!Ri-e*e &aleG el' lease ~ i-Aellllie IMa\\&,. kill-lei:&,. llb5\;e17CyeleG,. iiiRii Maei7 17CCHiil\\i-5Ral YE!Ri-ele&-. All other sections under 16.4-12 c are renumbered so as to be consecutive. Section 2. That the following new sections are hereby added to read as follows: 16.4-12 e (2) SALES L<Yl'S FOR NEW AND USED AlJT()1CBILES, I'Ul'OR VEHICLES, REX::REATIONAL VEHICLES, BOATS, TRAILERS, OR l'K)T()RCYCLES. (a) THE SALE OF NEW AND USED AIJl'a1CIHLES, l'K)T()R VEHICLES, REX::REATIONAL VEHICLES, BOATS, TRAILERS, OR f'oVI'ORCYCLES AT REI'AIL SHALL BE BY A DFALER LICENSED BY THE STATE <F COLORADO AW SOCH BUSINESS MAY IOCLUDE SERVICE AND ACX:ESSORIES, BlJI' SHALL NOT IOCLUDE THE REBUir.DING, OVERHAULING OR STEAM CLEANING OF f'oVI'ORS, REPAIRING OR REPAINTING <F BODIES, OR REUPHOLSTERING, EXCEPT AS A USE IOCIDENTAL 'ro THE SAID SALES, AND EXCEPT WHERE ENTIRELY <XlNDOCTED IN AN EOCLOSED STROCTURE. REX::APPING OF TIRES SHALL NOT BE PE~ITTED UNDER ANY CIRCl.J1STAtCES. (b) SITE PLAN SUBMITTED. THE APPLICANI' FOR APPROVAL <F A SALES L<Yl' FOR NEW AND USED AIJl'a1CBILES, l'K)T()R VEHICLES, REX::REATIONAL VEHICLES, BOATS, TRAILERS OR MO'roRCYCLES SHALL SUBMIT A SITE PLAN AT A OCALE NO S1ALLER THAN ONE lOCH D;)UALS FIFTY FEET (1" • 50') 'ro THE DEPAR'IMENT OF CCM1UNITY DEVELOPMENI' IN CONFO~E WITH SECTION 16.5--21 OF THIS ORDINAOCE. THIS SITE PLAN SHALL IOCLUDE: * A DRAINAGE PLAN. 2 • [ I • • ( • • • • * A IAYO!JI' OF THE PORTION OF THE SITE 1Q BE DEVOTED ro THE DISPlAY AND/OR S'l'ORAGE OF INVENTORY, IOCLUDING, B!JI' NOT LIMITED 'I'O, NUMBER, TYPE AND/OR SIZE OF UNITS ro BE DISPlAYED OR SWRED, THEIR ARRANGEMEm' AND L<X:ATION IN RELATIONSHIP ro FROm' AND SIDE PROPERTY LINES. THE MAXIMU1 NUMBER OF VEHICLES ro BE PERMITTED ON THE LOr SHALL BE POSTED (SEE SFrTION (d) • A MINIMU1 SE'mACK OF 12 IOCHES FRCM ALL PROPERTY LINES WILL BE REQUIRED. * THE L<X:ATION AND TYPE OF LIGiTING. * SURFACING SPECIFICATIONS. * A LANDSCAPING PLAN IN CONFORMAN:E WITH SFrTION 16.4-18 OF THIS ORDINANCE. * DESIGNATION OF PARKING SPACES FOR EMPLOYEES AND OJSTCMERS IN CONFORMAOCE WITH SFrTION 16.5-5 OF THE ORDINANCE. * THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE (SEE SFrTION 16.4-19 OF THIS ORDINANCE) • * THE L<X:ATION, TYPE AND HEIGiT OF FEN:ING, IF ANY (SEE SECTION 16.4-17 OF THIS ORDINANCE). * ANY OTHER INFORMATION WHICH WILL FACILITATE THE REVlE)i OF THE APPLICATION. (c) IN REV!E)iiNG THE SITE PLAN AND ACXXMPANYING Do\TA, THE PLANNING CXM1ISSION SHALL ALSO CONSIDER THE FOLLCMING: (i) LIGiTING SHALL BE DIREX:TED SO THAT THE BEAM, IF ANY, SHINES ON THE PREMISES. (ii) THE DRAINAGE PLAN AND SURFACE AT GRADE HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE DEPAR'lMEm' OF EN:iiNEERING SERVICES. (d) THE MAXIMU1 NUMBER OF AU'l'Cl10BILES, l'fJTOR VEHICLES, RECREATIONAL VEHICLES, BOATS, TRAILERS, OR l'fJTORCYCLES Ar.ImED FOR ALL PURPOSES SHALL BE SPECIFICALLY APPROVED ON THE SITE PLAN, AND THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF SAID VEHICLES PERMITTED ON THE PREMISES SHALL BE POSTED IN A CONSPICUOUS SPOT ON THE PREMISES. I'[)RE THAN THE PERMITTED MAXIMU1 NUMBER OF PARKED OR STANDING VEHI CLES ON THE SITE SHALL BE A VIOLATION OF THIS ORDINANCE. 3 • I • • • • • - (e) APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE. ( i) APPROVAL OF THE SALE OF NEfJ AND USED AUTCMOBILES, MOTOR VEHICLES, IW:REATIONAL VEHICLES, BOATS, TRAILERS, OR MOTOICYCLES SHALL BE CONDITIONAL IN CCMPLIANCE WITH THE FORECDING IIDJUIRFMENTS. (ii) THE a>NDITIONAL USE MAY BE AMENDED FRCM TIME '1'0 TIME AS REQUESTED BY THE <MNER OF THE PREMISES IN THE SAME MANNER AS A NEfJ APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE. (f) APPLICABILITY OF THIS ORDINANCE. THE PROVISIONS CF THIS SOCTION SHALL BE IMPUMENTED BY ALL mw USES FOR THE SALE OF mw OR USED AtJTCJ100ILES, MOTOR VEHICLES, IW:REATIONAL VEHICLES, BOATS, TRAILERS, OR MOTOICYCLES, AND UPON <MNERSHIP CHANGE FOR ANY SALES LOI' OR BUSINESS AFTER THE EFFOCTIVE Do\TE OF THIS ORDINANCE. WHEN THERE IS A CHANGE IN OfolNERSHIP OF A SALES LOI' OR BUSINESS WHICH HAS BEEN APPROVED AS A CONDITIONAL USE, THE NEfJ CWNER SHALL APPEAR BEFORE THE PLANNING <XH-IISSION '1'0 REAFFIRM THE CONDITIONS OF THE APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE. (3) At:J'I'CMOBILE SERVICE STATION STANDARDS. THE FOLLC:MING PERFORMANCE AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SHALL APPLY '1'0 ALL PERMITTED Aln'Ct10BILE SERVICE STATION USES. (a) USES PERMITTED. AN AUTCMOBILE SERVICE STATION SHALL BE A RETAIL PLACE OF BUSINESS ~GED IN THE SALE CF MOTOR FUELS AND IN SUPPLYING 00005 AND SERVICES GENERALLY REQUIRED IN THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF AIJI'(l1CYI'IVE VEHICLES AND THE FULFILLING OF MOTORISTS' NEEDS. MAJOR At:J'I'CMCYI'IVE REPAIRS, PAINTING, BODY AND FENDER WORK ARE PROHIBITED. (b) BUII.DING LINE REQJLATIONS. BUII.DING SETBACK LINE FOR ALL STROCTURES SHALL BE 1WENTY {20) FEET FRQ1 THE ULTIMATE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, EXCEPT CAOOPY ROOFS OVER PUMP ISLANDS AND LIGiTING FIXTURES MAY BE CANTILEVERED TO WITHIN FIVE (5) FEET OF THE ULTIMATE STREET RIGiT-OF-WAY LINE. {c) EXTERIOR DISPLAYS AND TRASH AND STORAGE. NO DISPLAYS OR STORAGE OF MERCHANDISE, AUTCMOBILES, PARTS OR REFUSE SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSER THAN 1WENTY (20) FEET FRCM THE ULTIMATE STREET RIGiT-OF-WAY LINE, AND ALL TRASH AND REFUSE SHALL BE S'IORED IN A BUII.DING OR WITHIN AN AREA ENCLOSED BY A WALL AT LEAST SIX {6) FEET HIGi. 4 • [ I • - ( • • • • (d) LIGiTING. ALL LIGlTING SHALL BE DESIGNED AND LOCATED SO AS 'ro CONFINE DIRB:T RAYS 'ro 'ruE PREMISES. (e) <XJl'SIDE l\CTIVITY. AIL l\CTIVI TIES, OI'HER THAN 'ruE SALE OF HCJroR FUEl.S AND 'ruE OORMAL SERVICES II'I:IDENTAL 'niERETO, ARE PROHIBITED <XJl'SIDE OF 'mE MAIN BUILDING. (f) OCREENING. A MASONRY WALL SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED ALONG PROPERTY LINES WHERE THE PRfMISES ABIJI' A RESIDENTIAL AREA. SOCH WALL SHALL HAVE A TOO'AL HEIGiT OF OOT LESS THAN SIX (6) FEE'r, EXCEPI' WITHIN 'lWENTY (20) FEET OF ANY ULTIMATE SrREET RIGlT-OF-wAY LINE, WHERE 'ruE HEIGlT SHALL BE OOT LESS THAN THREE (3) FEET NOR t-DRE THAN THREE AND ONE-HALF (3 l/2) FEET. (g) I..NDOCAPING. A IANDOCAPE PlAN IN CONFORMAtCE WITH THE LANOSCAPE ORDINA!CE SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION FOR 'ruE CONDITIONAL USE. ~+-tt:>tor Vehicle Repair businesses, not including body or (4) fender work, dismantling or collision repair, and provided that: (e) IANDOCAPING. A LANDSCAPE PlAN IN CONFORMAN:E WITH THE LANDSCAPE ORDINA!CE SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH 'ruE APPLICATION FOR 'ruE CONDITIONAL USE. ~ tt:>tor Vehicle Laundry or Polishing business, which shall (5) comply with the following conditions: (e) LANDSCAPING. A LANOSCAPE PlAN IN CONFORMAN:E WITH THE LANOOCAPE ORDINA!CE SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH 'ruE APPLICATION FOR 'ruE CONDITIONAL USE. +4+-Amusanent establisnnents including, but not limited to, (6) billiard halls, bowling alleys, coin-operated games, dance halls, electronic or video games, night clubs, outdoor commercial recreational facilities, pool halls or skating rinks. 16.4-12 g. Development Hequirements. (2) SE'IBACKS. (a) MINIMll-1 SETBACK FOR NOtCORNER LOTS SHALL BE TEN (10) FEET. 5 • I • - ( • • • • (b) CORNER WI'S SHALL HAVE NOT LESS THAN A FIVE-EWI' (5') SETBACK THE FIRST ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET FI01 THE CORNER. K>RE THAN ONE HUNDRED (100) FEET FRa1 THE CORNER SHALL HAVE A ~-EWI' (10') SE'IWICK. (c) WHERE A PROPERTY ZONED B-2, ·BUSINESS, ABI1l'S UPON ANY PROPERTY ZONED "R" RESIDDn'IAL DISTRICT, THE RESIDEm'IAL FRONT YARD RD;JUIIUMENT CF THE ABIJM'ING RESIDENI'IAL DISTRICT SHALL APPLY TO 'mAT PORTION CF THE PROPERTY IN THE B-2 BUSINESS DISTRICT EXCEPl' AS TO SIDE YARilS ON CORNER LOTS. Section 3. Public Hearing. In accordance with Section 40 of the City Oi8rter, the City Council shall hold a public hearing on this Ordinance, before final passage, at 7:30 p.m. on l'bnday, August 5, 1985, in City Council Chambers, 3400 s. Elati Street, f))glewood, Colorado. Introduced, read in full, ard passed on first reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 17th day of July, 1985. &Jgene L. ot1s, Mayor Attest: ex officio city Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of f))glewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, ard passed on first reading on the 15th dayof July, 1985. Gary R. H1gbee 6 • I • • • • • • • C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE July 11, 1985 INITIATED BY ACTION PROPOSED AGEN~~ ITEM IlL SUBJECT Agreement to locate a bus shelter on the Southwest corner of Broad- way and Hampden. Department ft Community Development Approve an agreement with the Regional Transportation District to locate a bus shelter in public right-of-way on the west side of South Broadway, south of Hamoden Avenue. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: David Apodaca, Construction Coordinator with the Regional Transportation District, has requested the City of Englewood to permit the installation of a pass enger shelter with in the public right-of-way for South Broadway in front of Key Savings. Several patrons have requested the shelter and RTD has taken a survey which shows that 45 people boarded the southbound 0 bus at that location between 7:00 A. M. and 7:00 P. M. This number of patrons meets the criteria for a passenger shelter. A member of the RTD Board of Directors has also requested the passenger shelter at this location. The City has requested that the bronze passenger shelter be installed, and Mr. Apodaca has agreed to that installation. This is the same type of shelter that will be in- stalled in the Englewood Parkway area, and it will be in harmony with the street furniture which will be installed in the redevelopment area. Installation of the passenger shelter is expec ted to occur sometime between July and the end of September. Work orders will be issued to the RTD contractor following the execution of the license agreement. RECOMMENDATION: It is the recommendation of the Department of Community Development that the City of Englewood e nter into an agreement with the Regional Transportation District to install an RTD standard stre t-side passenger shelter with benches, and having a dark-bronze- anod ized finish on a rectangular-shaped parcel of land 18'0" in length as measured in the north/south direction , by 9'0" in width as measured in the east/west direction, the northeast co m er of said parcel being situated 90'9" south of the existing south extended curb line of West Hampden Avenue, and 5'0" west of the existing west curb line of South Broadway. A copy of the agr ement is attached. gw • I • • - • ORDINAOCE 00. SERIES OF 198_5_ • • • BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUtCIL BILL 00. 52 Ull'ROOOC~Y COUtCIL MEMBER j) tfL ' AN ORDINAOCE APPROVING A BUS SHELTER ~ENT BE'IWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AND THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT FOR A BUS SHELTER ON "niE WEST SIDE OF SOl1l'H B~Y AT WEST HAMPDEN AVENUE. WHEREAS, the Regional Transportation District has conducted a survey as to the nlnber of persons boarding the southbolni 0 bus on South Broadway at West Hl!rnpden Avenue between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. and has determined that a bus shelter is needed at that location; and WHEREAS, based on this survey, the Regional Transportation District has submitted an agreement to the City of Englewood for construction of a bronze bus shelter at South Broadway and west Hclnpden Avenue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLaKlOD, COLORADO: Section 1. 'lhat the agreement between the City of Englewood and the Regional Transportation District entitled "am Passenger Shelter 8.ls ~te Information Agreement" is hereby approved, a copy of wh ich Agreement is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. That the Mayor and ex officio City Clerk- Treasurer are authorized to sign and attest said Agreement for and on behalf of City Council and the City of Englewood. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 17th day of July, 1985. Attest: &Jgene L. OtlS, Mayor ex offic1o C1ty Clerk-Treasurer • I • • • • • • I , Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the Ci ty of &lglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above arx'l foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ord i nance, introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Gary R. H1gbee • [ I • • • • • • BUS PASSENGER SHELTER BUS ROUTE INFORMATION AGREEMENT DUPLICATE 01\IGH•:AL _-L.-__ of .3 AGREEMENT made this---day of--------' 198.5, by and between CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, 3400 South Elati Street, Englewood, CO 80110, hereinafter referred to as "Licensor," and the REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, 1600 Blake Street, Denver, Colorado 80202, hereinafter referred to as "Licensee." In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: SECTION 1 THE LICENSE Subject to all the terms and conditions hereof, Licensor hereby grants to Licensee a license to occupy and use the premises described in the diagram attached hereto marked Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein, to wit: A rectangular shaped parcel of land being 18'-0" in length as measured in the north-south direction, by 9'-0" in width as measured in the east-west direction, the northeast corner of said parcel being situated 90'-9" south of the existing south extended curb line of Hampden Avenue and .5 feet west of the existing west curb line of Broadway . SECTION 2 TERM OF AGREEMENT The above described premises may be occupied and used by Licensee for a bus passenger shelter, bus route information, and for incidental purposes related thereto during the period beginning June 1, 198.5, and c ontinuing until this Agreement is terminated as hereinafter provided. -1- • I • • • • • • SECTION 3 TERMINATION Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving written notice to the other party specifying the date of termination, such notice to be given not less than six (6) months prior to the date specified therein. SECTION 4 MAINTENANCE Licensee shall, at its own expense, keep and maintain in good repair any improvements placed by it on the premises, and at the expiration of this Agree- ment restore the premises to their original condition, ordinary wear and tear excepted. SECTION .5 LIABILITY Licensee shall assume liabilities and losses for bodily injury or tangible property damage caused solely by the negligence of Licensee arising out of and in connection with the use and occupancy of the demised premises by Licensee, its agents, or employees. In the event of any such claims made or suits filed, Licensor shall give Licensee prompt written notice thereof, and Licensee shall have the right to defend or settle the same to the extent of its interest hereunder. Licensee shall not be liable for any injury or damages that may arise out of or in connection with the use and occupancy of any area under the control of Licensor. SECTION 6 NOTICE Any notices given pursuant hereto by either party to the other party shall be in wr i t ing and mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: -2- I • • - • To Licensor: To Licensee: • • • City of En~lewood c/o Densil Ragland 3400 South Elati Street Englewood, CO 80 II 0 Regional Transportation District 1600 Blake Street Denver, Colorado 80202 ATTENTION: Legal Office The address to which any notice, demand, or other writing may be given or made or sent to any party as above provided may be changed by written notice given by such party as above provided. SECTION 7 PROHIBITED INTERESTS No officer, member, or employee of the Licensee and no members of its governing body, and no other public official or employee of the governing body of the locality or localities included with the Regional Transportation District during his or her tenure or for one year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof. SECTION 8 MISCELLANEOUS 1. Agreement Binding. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. 2. Laws to Applv. The laws of the State of Colorado and applicable Federal, State and local Jaws, rules, regulat io ns, and guidelil"es shall govern th is Agreement. 3. Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended except in writing by mutual agreement of the parties, nor may rights be waived except by an instru- ment in writing signed by the party charged with such waiver. -3- I • • ( • • • • 4. Headings. The headings of the sections of this Agreement are inserted for reference purposes only and are not restrictive as to content. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement, effective the day and date first above written. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM FOR THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT Legal Counsel LICENSOR CITY OF ENGLEWOOD By __________________________ _ Title --------------- LICENSEE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT By~r=~~~~~------------General Manager -4- • I • • - • • • • • 1!>~!4A'( 61-1A1'1P~IJ CfT'f~,., IOiiJ,~!.-1000 A~PAI40i; NEW 4 '' FLATWORK ~MPOt;t-J AV[;. \ ~ 'lcl'-0" tL ~ • u 0 ...... ~ . I .J, " v ~:z ~ ~ ' ~~ ~ II\' ~ ~ i . ~lA co , .J ' LIVI ~ ~ ~-ti( ... tS~ 2 ~ ~-. ti tl~ s~ il ~~ -~ u . . . ~ ~~Li ~-~ ~eo uu S:~ ~2 a )l~\1 <l: u II e 0 uu2 at ~~~ 00 U{)( al u ~uo ._ltF :J' ~j \.1~0 "'~ ··~UI- 3: ~~~! ... 2~ SITE DESCRIPTION A rectangular-shaped pncel of land being 18'0' i n 1 ength IS ooeuured in the north-south direction, by 9'0 ' in width as measured in the east-west direction, the northeast corner of said parcel being situated 90 '9' south of the existing south extended curb 1 i ne of Hampden Avenue and 5'0' weH of the existing west. curb 1 ine of Broadway . 1-1 E9 .- I • • - J -• , ( • • • • C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT July 8, 1985 11 bi APPOINTMENTS TO BOA RDS/CO MM ISSIONS INITIATED BY City Coun ci l ACTION PROPOSED City Cou n cil officially a pp oi nt ci t ize n s to boards/ com mission s Background There curren t ly exists one vacancy on the Housing Authority (5-years to expire July 1, 1990) (Mayoral appointment). On the Liquor Lice n si n g Authority, t he r e is o n e vacan cy (t o expire August 4, 1986); there are also t wo terms of office expiring August 4, 1985, currently held by Do n ald J. St yes and R. L. Lunders. Attached are letters from both members indicating their interest in reappointment. Action Proposed Appointments be made as City Council deem appropriate . • I • • - • • • • City of Englewood ------- June 24, 1985 Honorable Eugene L. Otis Mayor City of Englewood 3400 SoUth Elati Englewood, ()) 80110 Dear Mayor Otis: 3400 S. Elali Street Englewood , Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 761-1140 I request to be reappointed for another term as a mell'ber of the Englewood Liquor Licensing Authority when my present term expires on August 4, 1985. RespeCtfully, .~ A ~';e~~~ 4320 South Lipan Street I • • - • City of Englewood June 24, 1985 Honorable Eugene L. Otis Mayor City of Englewood 3400 South Elati Street Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Mayor Otis: • • • 3400 S. Elatl Street Englewood , Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 761 -1140 I request reappointment to the Englewood Liquor Licens in g Autho r ity upon the exp i rat i on of my present term on August 4, 1985. I enjoy participating in this Authority and I value the importance of its work and missio n in our City. This is especially so during the period of Englewood 's redevelopment and growth. ~;:;:;:;;1~ ~~ Ronald L . Lunders b...s,~ 3000 South Washington Stree{ • I . ( l ( • ORDINA.OCE NO. SERIES OF 198_5_ • • - BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 54 Im'RODOCED BY COUOCIL MEMBER NEAL AN ORDINA.OCE SUBMITTING TO A VOTE OF THE QUALIFIED ELErTORS OF THE CITY OF ENGL~OOD AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELEX::TION TO BE HEW ON NOVEMBER 5, 1985 A QUESTION Rm.\RDING THE MEANS OF RESIDENTIAL TRASH PICKUP IN THE CITY. ~. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUOCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGL~OOD, COLORADO, AS FO~S: Section 1. '!here is hereby sul:nlitted to the qualified electors of the City of Englewood at the general municipal election to be held November 5, 1985 the question set forth below in Section 2. Section 2. 'Ihe voting machines and paper ballots for said elect10n Shall carry the following designation, which shall be the submission clause: FOR I AMENI:t1Em NO. ~ AGI'\INST Shall the City of &lglewood conduct a study to determine if it should authorize and undertake, by contract, municipal trash pickup services for residential users in the City? Section 3. Each elector voting at said election and desirous of vot1ng for or against said amendment shall indicate his choice by depressing the appropriate counter of the voting machine which indicates the word "For" or "Against" or by appropriate marking upon paper ballots, where used • 1 • I • • ( • • • - Section 4. The proper officials o f the City o f Englewood shall give notlce of said general munic i pal election, which notice shall be published in the manner and for the length of time required by law, and the ballots cast at such election shall be canvassed and the result ascertained, detecnined, and certified as requi red by law. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first read i ng on the 15th day of July, 1985. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 17th day of July, 1985. Attest: Euge£14:! L. 0t1s, Mayor ex officio C1ty Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 15th day of July, 1985. Gary R. Higbee 2 • [ I • •