HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-10-28 (Special) Meeting Agenda•
• •
•
•
• •
0
0
I . .
• •
-
•
•
SPECIAL MEETING:
•
• •
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
City of Englewood, Colorado
October 28, 1985
The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado, met in special session on October 28, 1985, at 7:30 p.m.
Mayor Otis, presiding, called the meeting to order.
The invocation was given by Council Member Higday. The pledge of
allegiance was led by Mayor Otis.
Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the
following were present:
Council Members Higday, Van Dyke, Vobejda, Weist, Bile,
Bradshaw, Otis.
The Mayor declared a quorum present.
* * * * * * *
Also present were: Acting City Manager Powers
City Attorney Olsen
Fire Chief Broman
Assistant Director of Community
Development (Planning) D. Romans Deputy City Clerk Owen
* * * * * * *
MAYOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO
CONSIDER A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
REGARDING THE MARKS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Council Member Bile seconded
the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Van Dyke, Vobejda, Weist,
Bile, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
Harold Stitt, 7000 West 24th, Lakewood, Planning and Zoning
staff member, presented the case on behalf of the Planning and Zoning
Commission and Department of Community Development (Planning). Mr. Stitt
entered into the record the following documentation:
1. Certificate of posting of the property
•
I • •
•
October 28, 1985
Page 2
•
• •
2. Certificate of public notice publ ished in the newspaper
3 . Resolution from the Englewood Chamber of Commerce support-
ing the Marks Planned Development
4. Letter from the Englewood Board of Educatio n supporting
the Marks Planned Development
The case before the Council was a proposed devel opm ent of a
632-unit apartment project located on US 285 and Gilpin Street (The
Marks). The developer of the project wa s Chasewood Company of Colorado,
a Trammell Crow Resident ia l Company.
Mr. St itt stated the case was reviewed by the Planning and
Zoning Commission and approved conditional upon 1 4 items being accomplished.
Mr. St itt sta ted the matter was now before City Counc il for final considerat i on.
* * * * * * *
Dick Campbell, president of the Chasewood Company, came forward.
Mr. Campbell described the proposed d e velopment and provided historical
information on the site plan. Mr. Campbell stated the project would be
financed by industrial development bonds. Mr. Campbell stated he met
with r ep r e sen tatives of the Waterford just east of the proposed si te and
was willing to make c ha nges to the project at the requ est of the se representatives.
* * * * * * *
Pearl e Rae Kortz, 1900 Eas t Girard Pl ace , came forward as
spokesperson for the Waterford r e s idents . At the request of Ms. Kortz
approximately 67 attendees stood up in show of opposition to The Marks
project. Ms. Kortz expressed opposition herself to the project .
* * * * * * *
Alice Meanwell, 1900 East Girard Place, came forward. Ms. ~eanwell spoke in opposition based on the problems of the buildings being
too high and blocking the Waterford residents ' mountain view , problems
with open trash areas , crowded parking, weak security, and the increase
in traffic . Ms. Meanwell also noted there was the possibility of a
retail center being constructed which would complicate the aforementioned problems even further.
* * * * * * *
•
I •
•
October 28, 1985
Page 3
•
• •
Tip Polumbus, 1900 East Girard P lace , came forward. Mr.
Polumbus opposed The Ma rks developm ent because it contradicted the
concept of the Wate rford.
* * * * * * *
Donald Pick, 1900 Eas t Girard Pla ce , came forward. Mr . Pick
opposed The Marks development and spoke to the security and traffic
problems that the development could create . Mr. Pick submitted
photographs of the traffic in the area at different times of th e d ay .
* * * * * * *
James Broman , Fire Chief for the City of Englewood, came forward
and stated t hat his departmen t could s till pro vi de the same level of fire
protection in the area if The Marks was built.
* * * * * * *
Tom Ragonetti, 636 Monaco Parkway, attorney representing the
Waterford res i dents, came forward. Mr. Ragonetti requested mor e time to
study the traffic study that was conducted on the subject area.
* * * * * * *
Ms. Kortz came forward again and stated the developer only began
work ing with the residents of the neighborhood last week . Even though
some progress has been made , e .g. the elimination of certain easterly
buildings, there wa s much work remaining. Ms. Kortz asked that Council
request the groups o f the Waterford and the Chasewood to continue to work
together , and that a reasonable timeframe be granted within wh ich to do it .
* * * * * * *
Sidney Parr, 3229 South Franklin , came forward . Mr. Parr
spoke for the neighborhood outside the Waterford. Mr. Parr stated
members of Chasewood failed to talk to these homeowners. Mr. Parr stated
there have been accidents in the area of Lafayette and Floyd. The
project wou ld further compound the traffic problems; and therefore , Mr.
Parr opposed the development.
* • * * * * *
Ronald Fish , 3210 South Franklin, came forward. Mr. Fish
opposed the project because it was contrary to the single-family concept
and that federal monies were going to be used to finance the
development • I • •
-
•
•
October 28, 1985
Page 4
* * * *
•
• •
* * *
Melvin s. Dills, 1801 East Girard Avenue, came forward. Mr.
Dills lived in Kimberly Village, a neighboring apartment complex. Mr.
Dills stated he was unsupportive of the Waterford project. Mr. Dills
stated his concern was whether or not a drainage study had been conducted .
approved. Mr. Stitt responded that the drainage plans had been tentatively
Mr. Dills asked that some sort of sprinkler system be addressed
because of potential drainage problems. Further, that the traffic study
covered too short of a period to accurately protray the problems in the area .
Mr. Dills was also concerned about the s afety rules that would
be observed during construction in light of children in the area.
* * * * * * *
The Mayor declared a recess at 9:20 p.m. and reconvened the
meeting at 9:30 p.m.
Upon a call of the roll, the following were present:
Council Members Higday, Van Dyke, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo,
Bradshaw, Otis.
The Mayor declared a quorum present .
* * * * * * *
Joann Edsel, 3200 South Lafayette, came forward . Ms. Edsel
stat ed each time a developer has wanted to build apartments in this area,
there have been promises of many amenities. Ms. Edsel stated she could
not recall that any of these promises were ever kept. Ms. Edsel
expressed an opinion that the Chasewood Company would be no different
from previous developers.
* * * * * * *
John Beinder, 2099 East Floyd Place, came forward , and supported
the previous speakers opposing the projects.
* * * * * * *
•
•
I •
-
•
October 28, 1985
Page 5
•
• •
At the request of Council, Mr. Stitt came forward are reviewed
the conditions of this development as set forth by the Pl anning and
Zoning Commission.
* * * * * * *
At the request of Council Member Higday, Dorothy Romans provided
testimony in the 60 ft easement along Franklin Street.
* * * * * * *
Luis Romero, 3220 South Humboldt, came forward . Mr. Romero
expressed concern about the impact of traffic at Girard and Lafayette as
well as the problems occurring from cars decelerating at the exit of Old
Hampden Avenue and Hampden Avenue. Other than this particular concern,
Mr. Romero stated the project look good.
* * * * * * *
Torn Crane, 3270 South Gilpin, came forward. He pointed out that
the exit from Kimberly Village to Girard was a blind spot and should be
improved if this development was approved .
* * * * * * *
There were no further comments
COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Mayor
Pro Tern Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote
resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Van Dyke, Vobejda, Weist,
Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * * *
COUNCIL MEMBER VAN DYKE MOVED TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT
INCLUDING ALL THE AMENDMENTS AS PRESENTED BY THE CHASEWOOD COMPANY; AND
FURTHER, THAT THE CHASEWOOD COMPANY COMPLY WITH THE 14 POINTS AS OUTLINED
BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, THE TRAFFIC REPORT AS OUTLINED BY
THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER JOE PLIZGA AND STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT; AND THAT
THE CHASEWOOD COMPANY PLEDGE TO CONTINUE TO WORK WITH THE NEIGHBORHOODS
TO FURTHER RESOLVE ANY PROBLEMS. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw seconded the
motion •
•
I • •
-
•
•
October 28, 1985
Page 6
•
• •
0
Council Member Higday opposed the development on the basis of incompatibility with the neighboring areas.
Council Member Bil o opposed the development on the basis of it
being inadequate compared to the surrounding neighborhoods.
Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Weist, Bradshaw, Otis.
Nays: Council Members Higday, Van Dyke, Vobejda, Bilo.
The Mayor declared the motion defeated.
* * * * * * *
MAYOR PRO TEM BRADSHAW MOVED TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING ON NOVEMBER
25, 1985, AT 7:30 P.M. TO HEAR THIS MATTER AGAIN. Council Member Van
Dyke seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Council Members Higday, Van Dyke, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * * *
There being no further business, Mayor Otis adjourned the meeting without a vote at 10:30 p.m.
•
1()
I • •
-"
(
.. -
0
•
•
• •
M E M 0 R A N D U M
To: Mayor Otis and City Council /~if)dJV"
From: Susan Powers, Assistant Ci ty Manager for Economic Developmen tl)v
Date: October 25 , 1985
Subject: Chasewoo d Planned Development
When the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Planned Development for
the Chasewood project on September 17 , 1985 their action was contingent upon
compliance with 14 conditions. Subsequently Chasewood Company submitted a
letter to Walter Stoel, Chairman of the Planning Commissio~which outlined how
they will comply with these conditions . This letter is attached as well as
the traffic study which was prepared by KKBNA.
The Staff has reviewed both the letter and traffic study and conclude that
they sufficiently meet the conditions set out by the Planning and Zoning
Commission . The traffic study has also been reviewed by the Colorado High-
way Department and their comments include the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The level of service at buildout appears to be adequate.
Acceleration and deceleration lane at Gilpin and U.S. 285, as well as
the left turn pocket at east bound U.S. 285 must conform to the High-
way a ccess code .
Double left hand turns may be required at Gilpin and U.S. 285.
No light at Girard and U.S . 285 will be permitted.
A full review by the Highway Department will take an additional 30 days and any
further requirements will be linked to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
I have discussed these requirements with representatives of Chasewood and they
have agreed to comply with Highway Depa rt men t requirements.
The staff recommends that the Highway Department comments as well as the co n-
clusions of the traffic study and the staff comments (Joe Plizga, Traf fic
Engineer) become additional conditions to the approval of the planned develop-
ment.
Also attached is a Resolution of the City of Englewood Chamber of Commerce
encouraging the City Council to support the Chasewood Development .
cmp
attachments
•
I • •
•
•
• -
c
THE CHASEWOOD COMPANY
A Trammell Crow Reoidential Company
Mr. Walter Stoel
Chairman
Planning Commission
City of Englewood
3400 South Elati Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Dear Mr. Stoel:
September 27, 1985
The Chasewood Company of Colorado, a Trammell Crow
Residential Company, is proposing the development of a 632-
unit apartment project located on U.S. 285 and Gilpin
Street, to be hereinafter referred to as ~ ~-
A preliminary plan was submitted to the City of
Englewood on August 2, 1985, which was then distributed to
the various departments of the City for comments. These
comments were incorporated into a planning staff report,
in which the staff recommended approval of the development
subject to the following conditions:
1) A fireflow
residential
site.
delivery rate of 4,000 gpm at
main pressure be made available
20
at
psi
the
2) The dedication statement on the plat be rewarded to
eliminate reference to streets, alleys, and right-of-
ways.
3) A drainage plan be approved by the Department of
Engineering Services.
4) An OPTICOM emergency vehicle traffic control device be
installed at South Gilpin Street and u.s. 285.
5) Fire lines be designated and meet the requirements of
the Fire Department.
6)
7)
Parking is to be prohibited on Girard unless the
street is widened as required by the Engineering and
Fire Departments.
Fire hydrants be located as required by the Fire
Department.
W PMf'rll f)aVUIIOn
112<• Lmcoln Stret•t I Suut· lfil~ /llenHo . Cnluosrlo ll(l~fl:l /l'hr.tw .1111//l'l~ 4~2
•
I • •
•
Walter Stoel
September 27, 1985
Page Two (2)
c
•
• •
8) An amenities/recreation package must be specified and
included in the plan.
9) The tot lot is to be relocated to the west of South
Franklin Street extended.
10) Legal descriptions for all water and sewer easements
must be approved. Water and sewer easements are to be
labeled as such and not as utility easements.
11) The Mountain Bell easement language is to be included
on the plat.
12) All ancillary service uses and subsequent changes in
uses are to be approved by the Director of Community
Development. Uses such as, but not limited to, barber
shops, beauty shops, gift shops, coffee shops, and
dining facilities may be permitted as ancillary
serv1ces for the convenience of persons living in the
development. No building permits will be issued for
construction of the ancillary services building until
a list the specific uses or businesses has been
submitted, and those uses are approved by the Director
of Community Development. Any subsequent changes in
the approved businesses shall be submitted to the
Director of Community Development for approval.
At the public hearing conducted before the Planning
Commission on September 17th, The Chasewood Company agreed
to comply with each of the twelve staff recommendations, as
well as the two recommendations that were borne of the
hearing:
13) The dedication on the final plat for Public
Service of an open, undefined easement for the
installation, operation, and maintenance of
service facilities in any common area, Public
Service further requests a 10-foot Gas Easement,
Book 3663, Page 142 shown on the plat.
14) A traffic study be conducted by a
engineer for the proposed development.
traffic
The purpose of this letter is to inform you .of the
progress being made in addressing these recommendations,
and to schedule their completion dates.
We have agreed to the recommendation calling for a
fireflow delivery rate of 4,000 gpm at 20 psi residual main
pressure, and we will provide this for the site •
•
I •
•
•
• •
c
Walter Stoel
September 27, 1985
Page Three (3)
We also agree to remove the dedication statement
referring to street, alleys, and right-of-ways on the final plat.
As for the nine comments concerning the drainage
report, seven have been addressed in a letter submitted by
the Holland Corporation that attaches to this package. The
comments numbered four and seven in the letter from Greiner
are to be addressed in the final plat after review of the
final drainage report, which is currently being generated.
The OPTICOM emergency vehicle traffic control device
will be installed during construction at a cost to be borne
by The Chasewood Company, as agreed upon.
Fire lanes will be designated on the final design, and
these will meet the requirements of the Fire Department as
determined in a meeting with Fire Chief Broman, Walt
Graditski, and Galen Miller during the preliminary review.
The same holds true for fire hydrants as their locations
have been mutually agreed upon and will be indicated on the
final plat.
The amenities proposed for our development are
indicated on the site plan. These would include three
swimming pools and three clubhouses.
The accompanying site plan shows that the tot lot has
been relocated to the west side of South Franklin Street
extended.
sewer
the
Water
not as
The legal descriptions for all water and
easements wil l be included in the plat after
preliminary plans have been approved and finalized.
and sewer easements will be labeled as such and
utility easements.
The recommendation that calls for the addition of
Mountain Bell easement language will likewise be addressed
on the final plat.
are
and
will
We will insure that only those ancillary services that
in compliance with the comprehensive zoning ordinance
are approved by the Director of Community Development
be located in the facility.
A traffic study has been conducted by the traffic
engineers of KKBNA, and it accompanies this package •
•
I •
-
•
Walter Stoel
September 27, 1985
Page Four (4)
c
•
• •
The final recommendation concerns the granting of
easements to Public Service for the construction,
operation, maintenance, and replacement of their facilities
as may be necessary when these locations become known. We
agree to supply these easements at tbe specified time, as
well as a 10-foot Gas Easement, Book 3663, Page 142 ahown
on the final plat.
The target date for submitting a final plat to tbe
City of Englewood currently stands for the week of October
14th, at which time virtually all of these comments and
recommendations will have been addressed.
Thank you for your time, effort, and counsel.
RC/lb
Enclosures
Yours truly,
~~
Rick Campbell
Project Coordinator
•
I • •
-
•
•
TO:
fROM:
SUBJECT:
•
• •
"' • a .. 4 • • • •• • •,. • o • • • • • •"
D. A. R~ans. Assistant Director for
C~unity OeveloP"ent Orper~
R. A. Ka~. Office Engineerl ~
Preli"inary Drainage Study for "The
~~ Plann>no.~ ~
The preli"inary drainage study for "The Harks" was originally
prepared by the Holland Corporation on 8~6~85. R review of this
study was ecc~plished by Greiner Engineering Sciences on
9/17/85. The Holland Corporation has responded to the concerns
addressed in that review end has su~itted a revised preli"inary
drainage study dated 9/Z6~85. I believe that this revised study
adequately addresses our concerns regarding "The Harks"
develoP"ent. Although there re"ains a couple of technical ite"s
to be addressed in the final drainage report. I would think it
reasonable to proceed with the develop"ent based on this
preli"inary study.
/lo
•
I • •
•
•
• •
.. ..... ··········· .
li Pfl P tr ll ' ,, I '\ : ;; .I!Uil : ..,
1.1 li..() "I 0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dorothy Romans, Assistant Director of Community Development
FROM: Joseph B. PlizgX:y Traffic Enl(ineer
DATE: October 25, 1985
SUBJECT: THE MARKS
I basically concur with the KKBNA Traffic Study pertaining to the
proposed development of THE MARKS, but have the following
comments:
Eastbound traffic on U.S. 285 occasionally queues
to S. Gilpin Street during the evening peak hour.
c ondition will not be alleviated until improvements
made at the U.S. 285 and University intersection.
back
This
are
2. Colorado Division of Highways should review and comment
on the proposed development.
3. "OPTICOM" emergency pre-empt equipment should be added
to the signalized intersection at U.S. 285 and S. Gilpin
Street (City forces will provide the coat of labor and
technical expertise pertaining to the installation).
4. Parking is to be prohibited on both aides of West Girard
Avenue within the proposed development.
5. Facilities are to be provided for the safe and orderly
flow of pedest rians and handicap persona ei t her within
the d e v e lopmen t or adjacent to the roadway. The roadway
i s n o t to be used for pedestrian travel.
6. Provis ions should be made for school buses to pull off
of t he roadway for the safe boarding and deboarding of
school c h ildren .
7.
JBP/sn
T h e r o adway b YBtem within the proposed develop10ent was
not designed o .· constructed in accordance with Englewood
s tandards and therefore will remain a private r11adwa y .
All maintenance including, but not limited to, s t reet
repairs, c urb, gutter and s i dewalks, signing, croHawalk
painting, drainage, snow removal, sanding and atref t
s w ee p i ng must b e borne by the property owners.
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
THE MARKS ~AFF IC STUDY
Prepared for:
THE CHASEWOOD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 1515
Denver, CO 80203
October 1985
By
KKBNA, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
4251 Kipling Street
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033
Nanette Neelan
Project Manager
W. R. Hamilton, P.E.
Principal-in-Charge
•
I . •
•
• •
TABLE OF CONTENTS
~
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. TRIP GENERATION AND DESIGN HOUR VOLUMES 2
I II. TRIP DISTRIBUTION 2
IV. TRIP ASSIGNMENTS 3
v. EXISTING AND PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 3
VI. LEVELS OF SERVICE 4
VII. CAPACITY ANALYSES 4
VI II. TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS 5
IX. SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS 5
X. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5
APPENDIX
Critical Movement Analyses
I . .
.-~--------------------~~~ •
~
I
•
• ..
-~ ~ . . . . . ............ ..
INTRODUCTION
This traffic study is prepared to address traffic related issues
relative to the proposed development of THE MARKS, a 632-unit luxury
apartment complex at West Hampden Avenue and Gilpin Street. The
Chasewood Construction Company proposes to develop this 25.5-acre site
into a 632-unit apartment complex consisting of 18 3-story buildings of
24 units each and ten 3-story buildings of 20 units each. This parcel
has had a long history of proposed develop~nt. starting with its
annexation to the City of Englewood in 1962. Current zoning on the
parcel is R-3 high density. The most recent previously approved
proposed land uses for this site included the development of high-rise
residential towers of 1100 units. The remainder of the study area is
occupied by two apartment complexes (Kimberly Woods and Kimberly
Village) and one high-rise condominium tower (Waterford). Kimberly
Village and Kimberly Woods account for 384 units and the Waterford Tower
accounts for 112 units. (Only 49 units were occupied at the time of the
study.)
The study area is bounded by West Hampden Avenue on the south. South
Lafayette Street on the west. Floyd Avenue on the north. and
Girard/Hampden on the east (see Vicinity Map. Figure 1). The site is
served by Girard Street. a 2-lane local private road. Girard Street
i ntersects with West Hampden Avenue and at South Lafayette Street. The
si te i s also served by South Gilpin Street with intersections with West
Hampden Avenue at an actuated signal and with Girard Street.
The primary purpose of the study i s to analyze the exist i ng 2-lane
Girard Avenue from safety and capacity considerations and to recommend
necessary i mprovements. Another purpose is to project the traffic
volumes that will impact the internal road system (Gira rd Avenue and
Gilpin Street) and the city-state system (US 285 and South Lafayette
Street).
.~-------------------------•
I •
1
•'
; i
·-:1 . _-: !.i ..
(
J [ ---·r · •. :J : :;_ • -~I :._ --.-
,.. -.. -.
•• . i '. --•
• •• •' 0 -•• ~ i -:~~: ~ ~ ~ ;! I ·---_.~:-.: :l
) l!; ; r~~~~:~;:
...... 1 --' -~~ -=--
1· :..!:. . -=-!
·~··
•
A Y(
•
• •
i :l i
I : .1' : . ,,
~t _.:_h
0
·~
.. ' :! •' :j' :: u I
: t, ·' I ... -1 ~ •. •I : " ~! .•
m .I i ... ;l .~ .. · p · ~·· .... ~: ·•
CAL£:: ... :1·.~~ · .:,i -·:J· ~; .··~ .!: . i _
... ~.-:.:..l~. ~i .~-1 ... 1 .1. ..
0 •·' 200 f\~YD
---~· -.. :;-;;-·. ... _ ---c · .. -----.JL.------·--
K ... IERL Y WOOOI
... ,ROMANI PARK
.. _______ .-""'--ftl.L --· --,.-,-----
THE MAAKI
IU8.1E CT BITE
•
KMERL Y ftUOE
LB. ::: ·.
=~----
THE
WATERFORD
·-...
I I ··. ':"""' ··~· ... : .... , .
I f ;
I . .• . . • ~
l ..... : .
.... I
:
•
•
• ..
In this study, existing and proposed land uses are considered~ trip
generations, distributions, and assignments are made~ traffic volumes,
existing and proposed street system operation, capacities, levels of
service, signal warrants and traffic accident histories are considered.
TRIP GENERATION AND DESIGN HOUR VOLUMES
Trip generation for the proposed apartment complex at build-out
conditions is presented in Table 1. Generation rates are taken from the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual. An
analysis is performed to evaluate the various trip generation categories
of apartment and condominium usage to arrive at generation rate that
best matches the current usage in the adjacent areas. These were
verified with extensive hand counts.
MOVEMENT
Total
Enter
Exit
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
TABLE 1
TRIP GENERATION FOR PROPOSED PROJECT
259
41
218
PEAK HOUR VOLUME PM
322
217
105
Trip distributions for the cardinal directions are determined utilizing
best available information and coordination with the City of Englewood
Traffic Department. Recent traffic studies in the vicinity of the site
are used to indicate major travel patterns. An investigation of current
market studies, relationship of the site to major employment, shopping,
major thoroughfares, and expressways also is made to provide additional
information regarding the traffic distribution patterns. The cardinal
directional distributions are shown in Table 2 as follows:
•
I • •
2
-
.. •
•
DIRECTION
East AM
West AM
East PM
West PM
TRIP ASSIGNMENT
•
• •
ENTER siTE EXIT siTE
48
52
70
30
49
51
52
48
Extensive research into the way in which existing residents use the
street system serves as the primary basis for making trip assignments.
Simultaneous physical observations during peak hour times of the
complete site area provides the necessary insight regarding the way in
which the street system is utilized and how well the street system
functions. This information, along with machine counts to determine
volumes, provides the basis for making trip assignments. Once
assignments are known, the street system can be checked for performance
by conducting capacity analyses.
EXISTING AND PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Existing traffic volumes are determined from several sources. Available
data from the Colorado Department of High ways and the Englewood Tr affic
Department are used in addition to supplemented counts taken by machine
and with turning movements taken by hand. Figure 3 i ndicates existing
traffic volumes near the site.
Both site generated and total projected traffic volumes for the
build-out case are presented in Figure 4.
•
I •
3
• -
•
•' •
~. UNIVERSii'Y SLVQ
.S.Cl.ARI<.SO._. ST.
£X!SnNG ADT TRAFFIC COUNTS I .
AGURE 3
•
•
• -
' . , .
i< "'t;'AROjLAFAYE17E J
' '~ 2J7o. . ~ GIRARD AVE
("737 ' -• . %-..
I#~
So.LAFA"fE-.,...1 r~e ST.
I . •
US. 2S5
BUILD OUT VOLUMES
• •
{
•
•
•
.. •
LEVELS OF SERVICE
Critical lane volume analyses are performed on the intersections at the
following locations:
1. Girard and West Hampden Avenue
2. Girard and South Lafayette Street
3. South Gilpin Street and West Hampden Avenue
Table 3 indicates the levels of service provided for the build-out
case.
INTERSECTION
Girard/Hampden
Girard/Lafayette
Gil pin/Hampden
TABLE 3
LEVEL OF SERVICE
AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
B
A
c
B
A c
As can be seen, there is considerable excess capacity at each of the
site access points.
CAPACITY ANALYSES
Capacity analyses are performed on Girard/West Hampden Avenue,
Girard/South Lafayette Street, and South Gilpin Street/West Hampden
Avenue. The capacity analyses are based upon the planning analysis
techniques presented in the TRB Circular 212 as updated by TRB Circulars
281 and 284.
Part of this analysis involves investigating the suitability of the
traffic signal at South Gilpin Street and West Hampden Avenue.
Currently, the signal is actuated on South Gilpin Street and for left
turns, from West Hampden Avenue. The green phase begins 30 seconds I . •
4
(
•
•
• •
following actuation and has a 10-second duration. Capacity analysis
indicates that the current signal operation should be adequate for
existing traffic on W. Hampden Avenue. A volume growth of about 451 on
W. Hampden Avenue could occur before it would be necessary to modify the
signal operation. (See Critical Movement Analysis US 285/Gilpin. AM in
Appendix.)
TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS
An investigation of traffic accidents associated with the site is
conducted for the period January 1. 1984 to September 24. 1985. In 22
months. there were a total of 17 accidents. Of these accidents. there
were three injury accidents and one fatality. The fatality occurred at
South Lafayette Street and West Hampden Avenue. The intersection at
West Hampden Avenue and South Gilpin Street had seven accidents; South
Lafayette Street and West Hampden Avenue had five accidents; and there
were five accidents at 1401 East Girard parking area.
SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS
An analysis of vertical and horizontal sight distance requirements for
Girard Avenue has been conducted. Figure 5 indicates the areas of
required clean horizontal vision. This generally means that a clear
sight window of between about 1.5 feet and 7.0 feet is required over the
area indicated. Also indicated are the areas where there is marginal
vertical sight distance. These areas generally meet the minimum
vertical sight distance requirements but are less than the desirable
values.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The traffic analysis of the proposed development supports the following
conclusions and recommendations: I • •
5
-
' &-:.
I,
•
•
• •
1. At build-out conditions. traffic level increases on West Girard
Street. South Lafayette Street. South Gilpin Street and West Hampden
Avenue are within acceptable levels. (See Figure 4)
2. Traffic volumes on Girard east of South Lafayette Street are
expected to increase 135 percent to a total AM peak hour
of 200 vehicles/hour.
3. The AM peak hour traffi c volumes on West Girard Street at W. Hampden
Avenue are expected to increase 47 percent to a total of 25
vehicles/hour.
4. Traffi c volumes on S. Gi lpin Street near West Hampden Avenue are
expected to increase by 150 percent to a total of 175 vehicles/hour.
5. Level of service for the intersection of South Lafayette Street and
West Girard Street at build-out is expected to be A.
6. Level of serv i ce for the i ntersect i on of West Girard Street and Wes t
Hampden Avenue i s expected to be B at build-out.
7. Leve l of serv i ce for the i ntersection of South Gil pi n Street and
West Hamp den Avenue is expec t ed to be C i n the AM peak and B i n the
PM pe ak at build -o ut .
8. The signal phase timing at South Gilpin Stree t and West Ham pden
Avenue should be acceptable up to a 45~ gr owt h in traffic on W.
Hampden Avenue.
g. The existing ri gh t -o f -way of West Gi rard Street shoul d be ade qua te
for a local street . pro viding pa r king is rest ricted. I • •
6
. '
•'
•
(
•
• •
THE MARKS
D ISTANCE ANALYSIS SIGHT
•
0
•
.:: ,..
_f~
•
•
• •
10. Obstructions (including parked cars) should not be allowed in the
areas shown in the Sight Distance Analysis. Only low spreading
plantings should be allowed.
•
I . •
7
-
-
•
•
•
•
• •
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
WHRERAS, the City of Englewood Chamber of Commerce is
aware of proposed development of property known as the
Chase Wood Development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood Chamber of Commerce
believes the increased residential development is in the
best interests of the City of Englewood community and
would benefit business in the City of Englewood trade area.
NON, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Englewood
Chamber of Commerce, that the Board of Directors:
Encourages the City of Englewood City Council to
lend it support to this endeavor.
DONE BY THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD CHAMBER OF CO~~RCE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS THIS 22nd DAY OF OCTOBER, A.D. 198 5 .
701 West Hamp,jen Su1te G 34 Eng lewood , Colorado 80154 (303) 78D-4473
•
I
-
-
•
•
• •
r~ ... ~ ......... AS iS
~b
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
City of Englewood, Colorado
October 28, 1985
SPECIAL MEETING:
The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado, met in special session on October 28, 1985, at 10:30 p.m.
Mayor Otis, presiding, called the meeting to order.
The invocation and pledge of allegiance were waived since both
were given at the preceding meeting that convened at 7:30 p.m. on this date.
Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present:
Council Members Higday, Van Dyke, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo,
Bradshaw, Otis.
The Mayor declared a quorum present.
* * * * * * *
Also present were: Acting City Manager Powers
City Attorney Olsen
RESOLUTION NO. 40
SERIES OF 1985
* * *
Fire Chief Broman
Assistant Director of Community
Development (Planning) D. Romans
Deputy City Clerk Owen
* * * *
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AtiD AUTHORIZING SUPPORT FOR MAINTAINING THE
DESIGNATION OF THE DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (DRCOG) AS THE AREA AGENCY ON AGING (AAA).
COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 40, SERIES OF
1985. Council Member Vobejda seconded the motion. Upon a call of the
roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Van Dyke, Vobejda, Weist,
Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
_1~.
• I -......... · -· ...
October 28, 1985
Page 2
•
• •
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 1985
* * * *
BY AUTHORITY
A BILL FOR
* * *
COUNCIL BILL NO. 82
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER MAYOR OTIS
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF NOT EXCEEDING
$50,000,000 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE
REVENUE BONDS (TROLLEY SQUARE APARTMENTS PROJECT) 1985 SERIES A, TO
FINANCE PROPERTY SUITABLE FOR USE FOR RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PROJECTS;
RATIFYING CERTAIN ACTIONS HERETOFORE TAKEN; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
DELIVERY BY THE CITY OF A FINANCING AGREEMENT AND INDENTURE OF TRUST,
SAID BONDS AND CLOSING DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; REPEALING
ACTION HERETOFORE TAKEN IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
Council Member Higday expressed his displeasure with the project
design as presented by attorney Bob Joyce.
MAYOR OTIS MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 82, SERIES OF 1985, ON
FIRST READING. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call
of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Van Dyke, Vobejda, Weist,
Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * * *
There being no further business to discuss, MAYOR PRO TEM
BRADSHAW MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Mayor Otis adjourned the meeting
without a vote at 11:00 p.m.
•
-
I • •
(
•
•
• •
__ f~
AGENDA FOR THE
PUBLIC HEARING OF
THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 28, 1985
7:30 P.M.
/CQ»'J ~~ .
1. Call to order, invocation, ple ge of allegiance and roll call.
2.
~1 Public Hearing.
(a) To consider a recommendation from the Planning and
Zoning Commission regarding the Marks Planned
Development. A..~'L-)J I 0: 3o r.
::~Adjournment. ~lj ~_g5
{
I , f)" J ,~;/~J.t:Y 12~tdf, /c·(~~ it /tv
AND MC COWN L i-1\
Ci Manager , J
~UJ_u AM/sb
I . .
•
• -
-
I . •
•
•
•
_j
I . .
• •
•
• -
-• • • ~ • .J_ J ...... ---"'·-· • •• • • • ............. .
I . .
•
•
AGENDA ITEM ----
I I 1_ __ c ~j,,J I._ {i ~-( I u ~
~; j l
U;~·c!oL-/ ~
od;. ;et lv...~ 1-{;
f() /lA ? <iJ
(]»_ ~.__)
ROLL CALL
•
• •
PRESENTED BY ------
Hoved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
Hlgaay
Ne1rt 7/M, ~
Vobe ida
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION : .
•
I .
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM -----PRESENTED BY --------
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
HlqelaY ~
. Nee+ ~~ {LJL ~
vobeida -, (..,.--'
Weist ---;:;;;:::
Bllo v-
Bradshaw v-
Otis v
MariON:
• I .
• •
•
• •
• t I -
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY --------
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
Hlg<lay
~7MAL -fL.i11
Vobeida a
Weist
v Bllo
77 4'b'r Bradshaw
l Otis
MC1l'ION:
I .
• •
•
• •
• dt ' t b m
AGENDA ITEM ----
rCJ
PRESENTED BY~ 1J l..fJ
(c/ () 1 I d u t~ -( :7 ~ •j/(ad ~
ltfl'() 0 z'ffi_ ~
(J2_ .co ~ rr..L
) [tuy-!~._.A)-
ROLL CALL
Lc i_ -~tu -v ~ /')<
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
HiQdav
Ne1tt 7JA... 'f.Jj,
Vobe i da ll
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOT ION:
• I . •
• •
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY ----
ROL L CA LL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
Hladay
fte'1ri 7J fuA </lt.-Jbo
Vobeida 0
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOT ION.
I . •
•
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY -------
/ I(• { t'J \V J
'u n ~&.
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Ab sta n
HIQCiay
1 .~7JIJM ~~
Vo b ejda u
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
I . •
• •
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY ----
<J o~ &~(~
I q 0 ° t: _)!k t tf-L .ci ;VjJ& ~
, h~,,~ r ;U~.fi -Gv
-o-r~ r ~ '6cn 61
.l_f [· /u oL ~) -;!. It~ __, /l 1
)d-1-11 dl/il.__
/U l'-'
-.'11~ ~,;_'1.
-,{A.?-1 ~/-~t C--<..A..)/ a;C'Y)IL--1~Mu )
-,d..L J-J '-.:) ~ ~ ~ (j -<-<-:r-7 ~ ~~-J --v 1? ( /----'
-c l ,._ k, .. -u ,._ / -/ u ~vu(p-d//UO-c-AL--.,vG
-ar~--
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Ab sent Abstain
Hlqdav
~ Y..ur .'-f . .14.
Vobeida n
Weist
IIIIo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION: .
I . •
• •
•
• •
• $ I !
AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY -------
(l V d---
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
HIQdav
~ 714M -{}d;--~...
Vobe1da u
Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
t
• I . •
• •
•
• •
AGENDA I TEM ----PRESENTED BY -------
t_ I l ' t:x-( 7A. Z;;
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
HIQ<Iav
. Nee+ 7r eM<. 'l.l.iP.I
Vo b eid a v
Weist
81 to
Bradshaw
Oti s
MOTION:
I .
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY ------
Moved Seconded Ayes N ay Ab sent Abstain
Hlgdav
ftH+!Ja"'' '11/..k.t..
Vobe;da
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION: .
I . •
•
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY -------
ROLL CALL
Hoved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
IQCiav
~ltTrhti. 'f~
vobe1da D
Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION :
I .
•
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY ------
~ I ) I 1 ;2 1--/ j ~c1C--<-.
ro 3 ~ );~~~ ~ Cf M#-t ~1 ~
-/)~-L~ ...____,.___ '(; /~ -<--<-; (_{!J'L~uuc.6 {._r
L{tj dY. -. -yrvn:£-dJ /1--'_j_ c~_A~/i Wv
-,_ L~ -l'u--?2/: lk_ Ct~'lunou _ _j/CA"~)~ ~o t'-" ~L
~ a LW ~ ~ r yKc ,J.
-YJLVl'_); .___,u ~ c-h-1 'Y--<--& o '1-A'· 'l· ~ t l
-r J t_. .... -J -t L /, f) u..) -')').. a J "/'-<'-1-'-d. f
-------
J (I t-711 I
-.. ~-~... l ' l ... JIV-Lf
)) l r <' [;_/;. -....... ,.,'
-. ) (; ).l......,__r[
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
Hlgday
~ '7/!LM. "{j_~.A7i..
Vobeida p
WeTst
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
•
I . .
n
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
HTgday
Neal
Vobe1da
We s t
Bll o
Brads haw
Otis
MOTION:
I . •
•
•
• •
PRESENTED BY AGENDA ITEM -----------
c_d
~/ {
-o L(..
~~ ~/ LJ
~ 1 Ot jil. ~ . ~-< c"-./ <-,[ ( c 1 '-
\) '-'l' 'J--LC of l, 'J r11 ~~
..L L___. c: ~ ~ D-' ') ~ --'I LC ---be_~
.:::z-1 } a <-P
c! ?( QL UAt'-./ ?< ¥2 t -{-K. .:1 j J ~OLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Abs t en
KTqdav
Neal
Vobeida
Weist
IIllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
•
Ab stain
I .
•
• -
AGENDA ITEM -r ~-1---~~ fj_ c -,.J
PRESENTED BY ------
((.f) 00 5---~---
Hoved Seconded A yes Nay Absent Abstain
Hlgdav
Neal
Vobe i da
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
I . •
• •
•
•
.. •
AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY ------
Moved Seconded en Ayes Nay Abs t Ab sta n
Hlqdav
Neal
Vobeida
We i st
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otls
MOTION:
I . •
• •
•
• •
_ _,.f~
~~----~~------~---
AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY -------
-/' t'll (!l2 ~1t_,·dL ~ cdrzrul--04 , ~
C-frw.-lu.J..Ju: tJ. ~Lc.L-dL .;-tn.L<:'tl~
"OLL CALL
Hoved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
HTQcfay v
-~-c: ,.. , 'b..ll_ v
.vobeida v
Weist v
Bi lo v-
Bradshaw v-
Otls ...
MOriON:
I . •
• •
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY -----------
--t ~ .)_(~ e__
32 tj ) uu Yt "J<j~-~
VI , ~ , j G~-r----r J-<., , t.> ,. >
J Yl ( A../l-' .,_) k{) I~ " J---c:)_p__ u-U7"r ,.,_ ~
--_/J·L 0 /I lL-sf :_,.-{ T"-!J
-/)L-0 ~~~--'-" lh{ l_
c.-'' ........_ ""'
ROL L CALL
1 Zc".,u.-<.....;:-·
Moved Seconded A yes Nay Absent Abstain
Hfgday
Neal
Vobeida
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
I .
• •
•
• -
_1~~-~--------------~------------------m+~l--~---
AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY -------
--L L L.AUcL t-U 'J.~ i
tuc~ Hl It ( bu
7<-6-·-. ~ \ t J. '-( < J-/) -tl--c_J ~ c.
Ck...: /). 15-. L /' ' 1 --r/c_ t d ~ ,____, y{G.-« ( I -
7L/. J', t cf '--l~ , o "-" ' o C ,~, 'rf u LLifL e_, 'Yl'f · h 'J-
u_y' 1 <-<:' t v" eLL~-<1 ~ ~ ~~L
-4-U> :' ~ 1 ,, ,, '" ' /}1 ,, J I ' ~ ~,, f"c:tJ,:.
-__AI. L lf/ -tJ-p0 JoJ tn-£p1. tL.--:.~cUe unJ
J
Moved Seconded
MOTI ON : .
•
Hlgday
Neil
Vobeida
Weist
Rllo
1i/J
-1.//f ?.4'2LJ
ROLL CALL
Ayes Nay Absent
Bradshaw
Otis
•
Abstain
I . •
•
• -
..
AGENDA ITEM ----
PRESENTED BY -------
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
Hlgday
Neal
Vobe=lda
Weist
Bl lo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
I . •
• •
• -
• -
_J
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY -----------
1-z L t~ t.<. 1...., T!..t 1-..t--1-I ) -~, 2t-t< .-::;-A) .. ~ Y----t· "-
-· _ 1 /)' ,____, c '"J, _. J c ... e~
,ol -t:• v __...A---
_,K. e ') .:uc d:. • u
)"J L )L /:.J /dK.
(1 J.LC--<..A.-t' '' ( -f...-" <l <-..., 0 (I '"j t"Lf~? ?'"2"'-~ {.t ) _,...)
/[L R l ..-d<-~ . I )._J.. 'I ;f 7 l LU-<-) 1 '---0 { cL<J-) ~~_p f
-
0 ~-,., {_ /LA') /)"1~ (A .. .:y/__ !..._,___, ;J<.J..-U_L ,.....__
-(Y,:J 3 '-(, ( ( L • '1 L?-{.l. c <-~ L L ·' 6--< .__.,.
{V l-;-;--
--FfA'Y\ (1)1 ~J:~l " I ~r-
v# /J( op 1 -;!. ,z£~< -d.' f-'[__/ ,Jt -<-------'
) ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye~ Nay Ab~ent
Hfqdily
Neal
vo be1da
Weist
Bile
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
• •
Ab~taln
·-
I . •
____ J
AGENDA ITEM ---
)_\ !2 lf'l l. ~ 1-.)
{e(lj{ }tf
;(;u<~~, t ,~tfi
I m "t1/) -~ }L----
Jic l -p t-/t~~· f [-
!1-t-tw (~]-1 t,-
{v_ f C:L ~ {v.
Moved Seconded
Hlgday
Neal
Vobe1da
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
•
•
• •
PRESENTED BY ------
ROLL CALL
Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
I . •
•
•
• -
_J
AGENDA ITEM ----
PRESENTED BY ------
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
Hlgday
Neal
Vobe1da
Welst
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION: I . •
•
_J
AGENDA ITEM -.::p:::.----
( t a c "){..,-./
(
.{_}__/){ ~
/ /'1 l 161 --)')l l ( /)
3 z (C.I I
~ 7 ~-1-.
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded
77 Hlgday
Neal
vobeida
Weist
Bi lo
L/' Bradshaw
Otis
•
•
• •
PRESENTED BY -------
Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
I . •
•
• •
_J
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY ------
p u l" h 1 uJ fi u , rj 1dr _ r ""~ -~ ,~ 2 ''f"·' 1 -u_/)J .
p .J....LU!4J 0-0 ..--~<: L4~ / .. [ Lu<-j [t ~ u_/ j -'t /'0-l<A-~-b-.
~ v{.U--1~---Tt~cJ r·
1) M'L -i!A'I-' HU¥ ' f..' ·--~ J;uu 1~ d.._,
- . I J<--t? c t J'~<j.Jf~ J.j._,.(_J
-l {i.A~ nc -{uu '1-?} (
t'"I.--6___):0.;L<..-l \·~~t ' /}~-) :c;,. 6-tJ <J
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes N ay Ab sent Abstain
Hlgdav
v Neal
Vobeida
WiT st
Silo
j/ Bradshaw
Otis
I . •
•
•
• •
AGENDA I T EM ----
PRESENTED BY ------
/it '?ICc{-(ff" ~--_A'c,a C fjJ {} f< ~.,_( c" "" ,_._.,"-
7 ic [u·-~-/.:S o-zr-zc -i..-,/}J ~{_._.l L -!J-/c_ cu-
/,1 vu1h2 i:, J'r t! /]'t/u ' ~ -~-,C-,-7>~
"-( /c /lL j;;tf~
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
Hlgday -
Neal -
vobe i da -
Weist -
Bllo -
Bradshaw -
Otis -
MOTIO N:
I .
•
•
• .. •
AG ENDA ITEM ----
PRESENTED BY ------
--+~'' 1 .''-' 1, t") -, cl • J 1 j tu-
( jl <~'f ....-1 "'it 3 {I I!)J V _
/01'-'~ M-odJ-
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent
HTQdav v Neal I
vobeida 7
Weist I
Bi lo l
7 ,/ Bradshaw \
Otis "-..
AbstaIn
I/-2 s ·::: ~ /. ,~E.), )J
~· tlL.J... 1 ct. L(._ t -I •
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM ----P RESENTED BY ------
5b .
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes N ay Absent Abstain
Hladay
Neal
Vobeida
Welst
Bllo
Bradshaw
Ot l s
MOTION:
I . •
• •
-
(
(
•
•
• •
AGENDA FOR THE
PUBLIC HEARING OF
THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 28, 1985
7:30 P.M.
1. call to order, invocation, pledge of allegiance and roll
call.
2. Public Hearing.
(a) To consider a recommendation from the Planning and
Zoning Commission regarding the Marks Planned
Development.
3; Adjournment.
{a~'~cl J/c"-t ~~
AND MC COWN
ci Manager
AM/Sb
•
I • •
•
•
• •
NOTICE OF CALL BY THE MAYOR
FOR A SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1985
7:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, is
called to a special meeting at City Hall, 3400 South Elati Street, for the
purpose of taking action by ordinance, or other appropriate means as follows :
Call to order, invocation, pledge of allegiance and roll call.
1. To consider a Resolution approving and authorizing support for
maintaining the designation of the Denver Regional Council of
Governments (DRCOG) as the area agency on aging (AAA).
2. To consider a bill for an ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale
of up to $50,000,000 of City of Englewood Multi-family Housing
Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1985 Series A, for the Trolley Square
Apartment Project, and declaring an emergency.
Adjournment .
AM/s b
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE
The following persons , all Council Members of the City of Englewood , do
hereby acknowledge receipt of notice of the above special call 24 hours prior
to the special meeting in accordance to Section 1--5--2-2 of the 1985
Englewood Municipal Code , as amended .
•
I • •
j
•
• •
I . •
• •
•
CERTIFICATI ON OF POSTING
Attached is a photograph of a sign as it is erected on the following
described p1·ope 1· t y : ___ H_a_m_p_de_n_a_n_d_G_i_lp_i_n_; __ P_Pr_n_u_m_h_e_r _1_9_7_1_-_3_5_-3_-_o_o_-_o_o_J_-o_o_4_:; __
1971-35-4-00-007
Legal Description
I hc~eby certify und er oath th at the above described proper ty was posted
continlously f or a peri od of 16 d ys, from --~O~c ~to~b~e~r~-------
12 19 85 t o ______ o_c_t_o_be_r __________ ----~2~8~---19 85
Sig natu re
1 Q -&--a -crs
Date
State of Color ado
ss
ounty of Arapahoe
. -"J(d, :?~, Subscribed and SWOI'n to be f ore me this .? day o f ...L.L:t~e(...L;.;:_:L£u:Io:::~""'~-~------
19 jb .
A separate ccrti f i , rio n s hall b e presented to the Depa rtment
of Community Dev lopn e nt for each Notice of Hearing sign.
Such certificaU on sho uld be submitted to the Department prior
to th e Publi c: l ll.-arin : in orde r that it ca n b e i n clu ded in the
information pre se n t '-d to the Public body b efore whom the
Hearing is being held.
(_j uf
~--------------------------------~ • •
I • •
•
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Attached is a photograph of a sign as it is erected on the following
described property: Hampd e n a nd Gilpin; PPI numb e r 1971-35-3-00-003-004;
-------------------------------------------------
1971-35-4-00-007
Legal Description
I het·eby certify under oath that the above described property was posted
continuously for a period of 16 October
-----------days, from----------------------
12 19 85 , to October 28 19 85
State of Colorado
ss
County of Arapahoe
Subscribed and sworn to before me this .;2-£-dt day of {f~l;;t~
19 g.;
Q 1?/tt~?!:? ' ~yPubliCj;f~~ (!ZtZ · c ;;tyet-tt~~a J'o110
A separate certific ati on shall be presented to the Department
of Community DevelOJJmeut for each Notice of Hearing sign,
Such certification should be submitted to the Department prior
to the Public ll e arirw in order that it can be included in the
information presentu d to the Public body before whom the
Hearing is being held.
• •
I • •
-
•
•
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Attached is a photograph of a sign as it is erected on the following
described property :
-------------------------------------------------1971-35-4-00-007
Hampden and Gilpin; PPI number 1971-35-3-00-003-004;
Legal Description
I hereby certify under oath that the above described property was posted
continuously for a period of 16 days, from ____ oc __ to_b_e_r ____________ _
____ 1_2 _____ , 19 ~, to ______ o_c_t_o_b _er ____________________ 2_8 ___ __
Signature
t o -o?-rs
Date
State of Colorado
County of Arapahoe
ss
Subscribed and sworn to before me this .;J ,("c/ day of Je.tig,_
19 J~.
Q ~~ ,--J?~a_/
19~.
~-y Puc 3<!-oo /~
c;~U)&~~ c; ?oil&
A separate certifica tion shall be presented to the Department
of Community Development for each Notice of Hearing sign.
Such certification should be submitted to the Department prior
to the Public llt ·arinl ~ in order that it can be included in the
information presented to the Public body before whom the
Hearing is being held.
;o -z r -~
•
I • •
•
•
-
1
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Attached is a photograph of a sign as it is erected on the following
described property : Hampden and Gilpin; PPI number 1971-35-3-00-003-004; -------------------------------------------------
19 71 -35-4-00-007
Legal Description
I hereby certify under oath that the above described property was posted
continuously for a period of --~1~6~-----days, from ___ o~c~t~o~b~e~r ____________ _
___ 1_2 _____ , 19 85 to October 28 ---~~~~-------------------~-----
LO .;}6-(1 5
Date
State of Colorado
ss
County of Arapahoe
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ~:::).(7:1. day o!fk~
19 f5
19 85
~y ~~t)~&!X
~?~cf) !iJP.l//(J
A separate certific a tion shall b e presented to the Department
of Community Development for each Notice of Hearing sign.
Such certification should be submitted to the Department prior
to the Public ll ~o·arin i: in order that it can be i n cluded in the
information presented to the Public body before whom the
Hearing is being held.
•
I •
•
•
-
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Attached is a photograph of a sign as it is erected on the following
described property :
--------------------------------------------------1971-35-4-00-007
Hampden and Gilpin; PPI number 1971-35-3-00-003-004;
Legal Description
I hereby certify under oath that the above described property was posted
continuously for a period of 16 days, from October -------------------------------_____ 1_2 _____ , 19~, to ______ o_c_t_o_be_r ______________________ 2_8 ____ __
19 85
Signature
ID -a -OS
State of Colorado
County of Arapahoe
ss
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,;y:rti day of d~
19 '/6
(} 7JJ-ut. ~Au A , ~riPu61'1~~~ 22...
0rw" c. 6 ~, // o
A separate certifi c :d .ion shall be presented to the Department
of Community Development for each Notice of Hearing sign.
Such certification should be submitted to the Department prior
to the Public llt•arin J; in order that it can be included in the
information prcsen ted to the Public body before whom the
Hearing is being held •
I •
I
•
•
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Attached is a photograph of a sign as it is erected on the follow1ng
described property: ___ H_a_m~p_d_e_n_a_n_d __ G~i_l~p -in_;~_P_P~I~nu=m=b=e=r~1=9=71=-=3~5=-~3_-~o~o-_o~0~3~-=0~0~4~; ____ ___
1971-35-4-00-007
Legal Description
I hereby certify under oath that the above described property was posted
continuously for a period of 16 ---':..:.... ____ _ days, from --~O~c~t~o~b~e~r ____________ _
___ 1~2~----' 19~, to --------~O~c~to~b~e~r~----------------~2~8~----· 19~.
Signature
I D -;;~--6'5
Date
State of Colorado
ss
County of Ar apahoe
Subscr1bed and sworn to before me this ()_JJ -d; day of (j,~
19 is--
.. t?;~~
"3 'loo __./ a~ .
c!. ~,. / (] ~C)/10
A s eparate ccrtif j :•liv n shall be presented to the Department
of Community Developme nt for each Notice of Hearing sign.
Such certification should be suboitted to the Department prior
to the Puhll e Jt , ar1n 1 1n or·der that it can be included in the
information pre s ent 'd to the Public body before whom the
Hearing is being held.
t ;._< ,, I f .
•
I • •
~· : ::= ..:!.:..::~"".::':!:. "":::. ~ ..::--~~ -.::.. ...
_ ..... __ lr __ ......... -•• ---·
-·., .. _ .......... (lo ..__, ._ -··-.-.--·· '"'-....... .,.. a..",.,_ ..... ~-·--• ... w.•uoo~~ ...... __ _ ·-......... "" --· ·--··-··-.... _,, ,_ .. ---.......... "' ,_ ...... --·· ,_ .............. -...... ---.. -. ._ ... _,,, ____ , ........... """.,. .. , ____ ., __
..... -··-.......... ----··-·-... -·· ,_ .. -......... :::.·.: :.:.: i.= .. -..;: ::-::·~~~~:. ..... .: ~ =--=.:..... _,., -·-·•coa.-.
~ . .._ ..• ._ ~--.. ----.---_ .. ,,--. ,. ... --..... -.... ---"" -·--... ·--.. -· ·-· ... -... ''" --··--··-......... -u.--..---o il·~ -•l.ool ""1_._.,-•-••
C.I..:SII). _,.,_ CIIIEU. IIIU. ••• --·-.... VOHt JOA .........
• ...._._,UCTm.&l.~&~taf-lM
_...., ... ICr -. ca., • -· to ... ~an .. -ar ~.__,,CillO._...._. ... --~ ~~~---......:-.-~. ~-a111a111 ~ • .., -EI"'Im-•a.a.-. -· -.. --...of te. ..... ~Ul~ oC • '-7 .........
fttu~u-._,,. ~~~~~~ .attt~n .._ ac, oC -~ ~ -w a..--.-... 1t:tro , .e.q ... 11 .. oe tt.e -'k t r u.n _. • .._....._ 1.-J.•U.. ......._ --.w., ...
_,, U. O ty .._... ~ ~ --• .. __,
• ...Uict ft -of IIU.U ... tfWI tt. Oty ..wt1 ·--· r.~lel .. , ................... -------......... .-.w..ua~ ·--a -1ft •• a.n t.a • ~•tt• oe
,..._ ... ~cl--.fa -u. -•ic.lllhy ., .. a.taal ._i._ •&euLct _. ~Le a~1
-· ~ •• rr C..~ • ,_ ctft CIIICIL ~ ,_ ctft ~ _...,.,, ~. ttletl
-~i ,.ITI~I .. ~~ ~-=-=·:,.~~~
~Ja..l l -.a.... ....... a...,.
L Vpt,<-.,.lf>S f oitll,.poo tro tg HO\/.to(JI)u" C rw"II.C::.III' Of Othef O.tltq4tf0u ..
Ari!Oes fht> r.o ,.,., ,,.,,..rootl lo '" ~101)11 1130:1 111 at !I'll'
Ut~-lntm r .... C0\1 .. lot ..... n.c;-toao "f))Otmq "•P'"..,"'""" blastul{l
ill)ef\l"i ""''9t''OU'" lllrf"•c; 11 .. 01 "''"'-"' d tnqo .. Oto,. ~·hcht' a •f'
J\el"''h~ • ~···•ol·~llf'd 14 ... .,..,..., .....
I 5,.,,, .. F.,. Oo tvc
? US 11 '0''.,•'W 28'• t.ACLIJ 1\lt"l'l' BETW£Ut 'HE HOU AS
CCIAMi: ~oCING A t tf) on I'M .&'-0 lNOI"fG At 6 00 A M ··-··-··-6 , .........._.
(M.~. ~ 1ft hll\,-..... -u •• «.-r'-f ....
•• .;.., A ~ ~ \GIIItr", • ..r. .
.-1! ....... , ...... Oitt.__ .... .., ..
~.1 •• ....c ., .....
h t C....,I .IU ~
•Ci'lCiidtja.'i .........
J•l co.-r•·"'..,.. SiiL .....
•-•-t
1 -JI • 1 101~~ ................ _._."' ..
~r .. c..-.tWteiM.._-....., .. ...._........_
o.-Of ,... -.....u 011 n. ~ .............. , .. .,_.,_. ....
-fiMVIfojflON ~
C~ncJH C~ n.c.,A._..,._ .. C~ft/1 ......... ~
................ 101114 .... 1tiJI
•nT'Unc:w n-..........,_._ ... .....,..,-......,..,
~ ............... ~ .......
,......~ ............. _. . ._....,
• .., --_.._....., ...... ~-10 ... ....
I -
' (_ t l f
•
•
• •
~
NORTH
~110 .-ouna 'Oflt .,. .. cua CMR'f..O HAZ~ MATI:MA4.a
, CITY OF
'',ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
'· ~.t _u_ .
~
NORTH
'::;
--.. ·-.__
..,..," rw .u•uc IIIUtTIIO
:!!::.!~ :~~r!-:-,!.~:~ ~::.~::.: :-IIM~•d~~ Cl~'/ o:lc=~~·'
l ttt , .t 1 , ••. l~t '"-e-11 oro~,. •' ,,..-cti r •• .,,.,....,., uea .... ,r,a..rnr-•, •• __ , .. , .,.,. •••• "•..., o. .... t~···
.._, •• ,. t ..... II .. M I t 0.. ...... c..,.._.,
... ,_ ........ , ........ ,. -, ........ , ... ~ _, .,.., ht .. ,._ •• the
.......... ll• ... ph".
., M .. r ef .... Cltl' CMMil 1 t t M Clt p •I lft1ile-.., Ceh r ... , I t I U -~~ .. -o. ...... '· ""·
'*' ... , •. "'• .... .. ell lele (ltf ClMih fflll'ffet --.. ·-.__
•
I •
-
•
•
• •
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD CHAMBER OF COKMERCE
WHRERAS , the City of Englewood Chamber of Commerce is
aware of proposed development of property known as the
Chase Wood Development; and
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood Chamber of Commerce
believes the increased residential development is in the
best interests of the City of Englewood community and
would benefit business in the City of Engle'<lOOd trade
area.
NO\v, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Engle\~ood
Chamber of Commerce, that the Board of Directors:
Encourages the City of Englewood City Council to
lend it support to this endeavor.
DONE BY THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD CHAMBER OF CO~MERCE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS THIS 22nd DAY OF OCTOBER, A.D. 1985.
701 West Hampden Su1te G 34 Englewood Colorado 80154 (303) 789-44 73
'-(' i c I IL<. I.'-<. ( f{ ;o /zr !g-r
•
I • •
•
Englewood Schools
A Slep A head
BOARD OF EDUCATION
October 25, 1985
Ms. Susan Powers
Assistant City Manager
for Economic Development
City of Englewood
3400 South Elati Street
Englewood, CO 80110
Dear Ms . Powers:
•
• •
IT " 198~
The purpose of this letter is to indicate the Englewood Board of Education's
endorsement and full support of "The Marks" project to be constructed by the
Chasewood Construction Company on the west portion of the Waterford site which
is in the Englewood school district .
We are pleased with the prospect of this development because of its potential
for adding attractive and much-needed housing in the City of Englewood and the
Englewood School District. Furthermore, this project will be of significant
value to the school district because of its potential for adding some student
enrollment . As you know , the school district has experienced enrollment
decline for many years . It is important for the strength and well-being of the
community to do everything possible to stabilize the school enrollment --both
in the interests of the school district and our educational programs , and
also as another means of adding to the stability of Englewood as an attractive
residential community.
Again, on behalf of the Board of Education , I want to indicate our strong
support of "The Marks" project .
Sincerely,
~:~:.1.~
Bo ard of Education
RMW : rh
; ___
Adm•n•strot1ve Off1ces 4101 South Bannock Street Englewood , CoiOf'odo 80110 (303) 761 ·7050
•
I • •
• . I
....... f-7
-::::---..!.--1
--t __...,
_..,
uteuqy 1u a s qy Ae N saAy
_, .. ,I 1 .... 1 1
3400 South Elatl
1#4 Maddox School
700 West Mansfield Ave.
DISTRICT 3
1#9 Lowell School
3784 South Logan
1#10 Volunteer Fire Station
590 East Quincy
1#11 Cherrelyn School
4550 South Lincoln
#12 Duncan School Building
4800 South Pennsylvania
}.8 03J.N3Salid
-•
•
cl: .:< F : c7 I --y',<--t uuf ;; N
· Lt<..Gr3<e :JI '7') 1:
' /'I l .--.·;pi) fri)" lJ :NO I .LOW
spo
1"11!4SPI!JQ
0 1 !II
~SlaM
ep~aqo[l.
teaN
AI!P b!H
papuo:>as pall OW
11VJ 11011
"' ""I I U I I O "" I l U I "'"'\.#I I VV t
3195 South Lafayette
1#8 Baptist Seminary
•
3401 South University Blvd .
DISTRICT 4
1#13 Clayton School
4600 South Fox
1#14 Clayton School
4600 South Fox
1#15 Sincla i r Middle School
300 West Chenango Ave .
1#16 Centennial Luth~ran Church
3595 West Belleview Ave .
--V_t\h crm"'" .,.,,.
-
JOE BILO-___,
•
REPRESENTS YOU ...
( *Citizens who take pride in themselves )
and their community
Incumbent , Counc ilman (A t Large)
Joe Bllo has been a res ident of Englewood since 1958. He and his wi fe Jan, a native of Englewood , live at 4095 So . Jason
St. They have four ch i ldren · Suzanne , Mi chael , Christopher and Alan who have graduated from Englewood High School.
Joe Is 49 years old. He served In the USAF for four years and has been employed by the Civil Serv ice for the past 27
years. The Englewood community and his family have been most Important to Joe. Throughout the year s he has been
very active In our Eng lewood commun ity, as well as metropolitan affairs [Cubmaster Pack 333 ; Scout Troup 92 ; Old
Timers; Englewood High School Boosters; Past Pres ident Maddox Parent Group ; Englewood High Schoo l Long Range
Plann ing Comm iss ion and HUB Committee; past member of the Englewood Planning and Zoning Comm i ssion ; presen t
Member At Large/City Council; School/C ity comm ittee member; present member Board of Directors of the De nve r
Reg iona l Counc il of Governments (DRCOG); chairman of Plann i ng Services Polley Sub-comm ittee, program comm ittee
membe r, Urban Systems Committee member and Congress of Local Governments member). Joe and his fam il y atten d
t he St. Lou is Catholic Church , and he Is a member of the Elks Lodge 12122. Joe feels t hat he Is an Integral part of yo ur
stron g, compatible, "people-oriented " council which works together fo r t he betterment of Eng lewood .
De•rFrlencls
You m•ke very crltlc•l •nd lmport•nt decisions concerning your represent•tlon on city council .
• You selected me as one of your choices .
• It has been an honor to have bee n your representative . With the full support of my family, I am willing to be your voice In city affairs for an other term .
• Please Jo i n me .... make this a united effort to maintai n a strong 'people oriented ' counc il wh ich can "work together"
fo r the betterment of our communi t y.
• Your vote Ia needed November 5, 198 5.
• May 1 reemphas ize that 1:
• strongly advocate the preservation of t he si ngle fa mily res ident ial 'Life Style' In Engl ew ood .
• bel ieve In the encouragement & deve lopmen t of bus ine s s fo r the ec onom ic su pport of our city.
• feel the need for a community s uppo rted comprehen s ive growth prog ram .
• encourage the part i c ipation of En glewood citizens In all ph ases of city development .
• propose "work i ng together" to make Eng lewood 'A grea t place to Live ' for all those who take pr ide In
themselves and their community.
• prom i se to continue to listen to your point of vi ew on Issues.
• "Our city Is an Important Inves t ment · Let 's pro t ect Ill "
I ""d your vote November 5, 1885.
Paid b)' ttte commlttM to e lect Joe Bllo
Ch airman Th .ct C.r.on, TrNaurtf Jan 1 /lo
Si nce rely, ~ on~-4 0 57
•
I • •
•
• •
This Is where you vote:
DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2
1#1 Scenic VIew School 1#5 Washington School 2323 West Baker 3185 South Washington
1#2 First Baptist Church 16 Malley Center 3170 South Broadway 3380 South Lincoln
113 City Hall 1#7 Charles Hay School 3400 South Elatl 3195 South lafayette
1#4 Maddox School 1#8 Baptist Seminary
700 West Mansfield Ave. 3401 South University Blvd.
DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4
1#9 lowell School 1#13 Clayton School 3784 South logan 4600 South Fox
1#10 Volunteer Fire Station 1#14 Clayton School 590 East Quincy 4600 South Fox
1#11 Cherrelyn School 115 Sinclair Middle School 4550 South lincoln 300 West Chenango Ave.
112 Duncan School Building 116 Centennial lutheran Church 4800 South Pennsylvania 3595 West Belleview Ave .
I .
• •
,----JOE BILO ~
REPRESENTS
( *Citizens who like pride in themselves )
1nd their community
I need your vote November 5, 1985
•
• •
•
0
0
I • •
AG'"DA-:lwiJ 'f>Utr-
~d~
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded
rrrgcray
Neal
Vo b eida
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
Mal' ION: ( ((/ ( tf. ( ...__
/{):3~y
•
• -
PRESENTED BY -------
Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
t-
t---
L--
q -; --::::::--r;. p
I .
•
• -
• •
AGENDA ITEM -----PRESENTED BY --------
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
~'!l ..!:::__ Nea_J v--
VobEU_da ~ We_!_st .~
_1.1 lo ~ Bradshaw y--
Otis .!::::..
MOTION:
I • •
• •
-
•
•
•
• •
NOTICE OF CALL BY THE MAYOR
FOR A SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1985
7:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, is
called to a special meeting at City Hall, 3400 South Elati Street, for the
purpose of taking action by ordinance, or other appropriate means as follows:
Call to order, invocation, pledge of allegiance and roll call.
I . To consider a Resolution approving and authorizing support for
maintaining the designation of the Denver Regional Council of
Governments (DRCOG) as the area agency on aging (AAA).
2. To consider a bill for an ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale
of up to $50,000,000 of City of Englewood Multi -family Housing
Mortgage Revenue Bonds, 1985 Series A, for the Trolley Square
Apartment Project, and declaring an emergency.
/.3. ·' Adjournment .
[}Wy~c ~ ~-
ANDY pi'IC COWN
City Manager
AM/sb
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE
The following persons, all Council Members of the City of Englewood, do
hereby acknowledge receipt of notice of the above special call 24 hours prior
to the special ~eting in accordance to Section 1--5--2-2 of the 1985 Englewoo · u ieipal Code , as ded.
I-~A/-"'~
--r u..,qwlt.._ .~ · ,;?.{ ~·
1/z_~fJ:rt~.-!/~.f;L
•
I • •
(
•
•
• •
NOTICE OF CALL BY THE MAYOR
FOR A SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, OCTOBER 28, 1985
7:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, is
called to a special meeting at City Hall, 3400 South Elati Street, for the
purpose of taking action by ordinance, or other appropriate means as follows:
Call to order, invocation, pledge of allegiance and roll call.
I.
2.
AM/sb
To consider a Resolution approving and authorizing support for
maintaining the designation of the Denver Regional Council of
Governments (DRCOG) as the area agency on aging (AAA).
To consider a bill for an ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale
of up to $50,000,000 of City of Englewood Multi-family Housing
Mortgage Revenue Bonds , 1985 Series A, for the Trolley Square
Apartment Project, and declaring an emergency .
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE
The follow i ng person s, all Counc il Member s of the City of Englewood , do
he re by ac knowled ge receipt of no ti ce of th e ab ove speci al call 24 ho ur s prior
to the sp eci al meet i ng in accordan ce t o Secti on 1--5--2-2 of the 1985 Engle wood Mu nici pal Code, as ame nde d.
I .
•
• •
AGENDA ITEM _ __,/'-----
Gn/)'
PRESENTED BY _ _1!__""-~-=(j)_:....::c_::;_ __ _
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye !t-, Nay Absent b A sta n
Hlgoay
Neal
v Vobeida I
Weist I
v Bi lo _j_
Brads haw ~
Otis '-
I • •
• •
-
•
•
•
•
• •
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING SUPPORT FOR MAINTAINING THE
DESIGNATION OF THE DENVER REGIONAL CO!.JOCIL OF OOVERNiENTS (DRCOG)
AS THE AREA AGEICY ON AGING (AM) •
WHEREAS, the Older Americans Act of 1965 requires States to
designate Area Agencies on Aging which plan, coordinate and fund
services for older people; and,
WHEREAS, On February 8, 1974, the Denver Regional Council of
Governments was designated by the State of Colorado to receive and
administer Older Americans Act programs for the eight-county
Denver metropolitan area; and,
WHEREAS, the Denver Regional Council of Governnents has served
eleven years as the state designated Area Agency on Aging for
Colorado Plann ing and Managanent Region III which represents Adams,
Arapahoe, Boulder, Denver, Clear Creek, Gilpin, Douglas and
Jefferson Counties; and,
WHEREAS, the Denver Regional Council of Governments has
equitably administered the allocation process for funding senior services in the past; and,
WHEREAS, the Denver Regional Council of Governments is urged
to continue its actions for equitable and increased allocation of
funds to the Denver region; and,
WHEREAS, the growth in the aging population and the increasing
needs of our older constituents are a concern for every local
government. Local governments should participate in the planning
and allocation of resources through efficient, cost-effective regional programs.
NCM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUOCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLCMS:
That the City of Englewood supports maintaining the existing
eight-county planning and service area and maintaining the
designation of the Denv er Regional Council of Governments as the
Area Agency on Aging .
ADOPT ED AND APPROVED the 28th day of October, 1985 .
Attest:
Eugene L. otis;-Mayor--·
•
I • •
•
•
• •
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City
o f Engle<.K>Od, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and canplete copy of Resolution No. _, Series
of 1985.
Gary R. Hlgbee
•
I
I • •
C 0 U N C I L
DATE
Octobe r 24, 1985
•
• -
C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N
AGENDA ITEM
~ ..
SUBJECT Bill for ordinance for the
issuance of Industrial Development Bonds
for the Trollev Sauare Aoartments
INITIATED BY City Manager's Office
ACTION PROPOSED Approve Bill for Ordinance as emeuency ordinance for issuance
of Industrial Revenu·e Bonds for Trolley Square Apartments
BACKGROUND:
Recently the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority purchased the "old" King Sooper's block
with the intent of selling the property to Brady Corporation for redevelopment. The
contract between the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority and Brady for this trar.saction is
being presented to the Urban Renewal Authority within two weeks. In order to finance
a portion of the redevelopment, Brady is requesting the issuance of Industrial Develop-
ment Bonds for the Trolley Square Apartments which will be located on the west e rn portion
of the site . The City has already approved the inducement resolut ion for the issuance
of up to $50,000,000.00 in Industrial Development Bonds.
The documents have been reviewed by Tom Bishop, financial advisor for the City (Hanifen,
Imhoff & Co.) and Diane Barrett, attorney with Lamm Eastrom and their comments have been
incorporated.
The City has been requested to approve the ordinance with an emergency clause due to the
pending changes in the federal tax law which may affect our ability to issue industrial
development bonds in the future. Since this possibility exists, many developers are
requesting issuance of bonds in November and December and the interest rates may not be
as favorable due to the volume of bonds in the market place. The second readin g on the
ordinance will be on November 4, 1985.
The proposed project consists of 340 units of adult housing (age 55+) in three buildings
joined together by a central corridor. The complex is being designed by Pouw Architects
and it is estimated to begin construction in early 1986. The project i s anti cipat e d to
be insured by FHA which will further enhance Brady's ability to o btain finan cing.
The buildings are currently being designed and when th~ final budget is available , the
staff will inform the Council. The ordinance allows up to $50 million in Industrial
Development Bonds to be issued but we don't expect the final amount to approach that
figure. The budget will be final prior to closing which will occur in late November or t early December, 1985 .
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
•
• •
---------------------------------------------------------------------.
-2-
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Mayor and Council approve the Bill for Ordinance as an
emergency ordinance for the issuance of Industrial Development bonds for the Trolley
Square Apartments .
SUGGESTED ACTION:
MOVED BY ______________________________ _
SECOND·--------------------------------
YES ____________ ~NO ____________ ~BSENT __________________________ _
•
I •
-
•
•
•
•
• •
BOND CIIOINNICI
CITY OF I!NGLIIIOOO, COLORADO
MULTI-FAMILY HOUSIIC IOt'I'GIIGE IU:VEIIIE BONDS
!Trolley Squere AplorU.enta Project)
1985 SERIES A
FIRST REAOING1
FINAL ADOPI'ION :
•
I • •
-
•
•
ORDINA!CE l«l.
SERIES OF 198~
BY Alli'HORITY
A BILL FOR
•
• •
CXlUNCIL BILL l«l. 8 2 llfl'RODUCM COUICIL
KEMBER h
AN CJ!DINAICE AlmtORIZING 1liE ISSlWCE AM> SALE OF lOT EXCEEDING
$50,000,000 CITY OF DQ.DI(XX), Cl>LORADO, lt.JLTI-Fl\MILY HJUSING
rt:JR'I'Go\GE REIIENUE BONDS (TROLLEY SQUARE APAR'll'IENI'S PROJ!X."'') 1985
SERIES A, TO FINAICE PROPERTY SUITABLE FOR USE FOR RESIDE!fl'IAL
Rmi'AL PROJE:TS; RATIFYING CERTAIN ICI'IONS ~ 'l'AKEN;
AIJI'IIORIZ I NG 'niE EXB:l11'ION AND DELIVERY BY 'n1E CITY OF A FINAICING
IIGREfMENl' AM> INDENJ'URE OF TRUST, 51.10 BONDS AND CLOSING J:XJCa1ENI'S
IN CXlNNECTION 1l!ERa<ITH; REPEALING ICI'ION HERETOFORE TAKEN IN
CONFLICT IIEimWI'Ill; AND Ofl:IARING AN I:MERGE!CY.
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood Colorado, (the "Issuer") is a
legally ..00 regularly created , established municipal corporation
duly organized ..00 existing as a hane rule city pursuant to Article
XX of the Constitution of the State of Colorado; and
WHEREAS, the provisions of the County and lt.micipali ty
Developnent Revenue Bond Act, constitut ing Article 3, Title 29 ,
O>lorado Revised Statutes (the "Act"), authorize municipalities to
finance, refinance, acquire, own, lease, iq>rove ..00 dispose of one
or more projects, including any 1..00, b.lilding or other iq>IOV8lle!lt
and all real or per&onal properties sui table or used for or in
connection with residential rental projects upon auch conditions as
the aunicipality may deem advisable; and
-1-
•
I • •
•
•
• •
WHEREAS , such aunicipelitiea ere further authorized by the
Act to iuue revenue bonds for the purpoa of defrayifiCJ the coat of
f1 nancing any such project 1 end
IIBEREAS, such aunicipalitiea aay .. thor ir.e the ... r at the
project, or an agent of the user or • trustee, to diabur• the pro-
ceeds of such bond& to pay certain ooata author h:ed by the Act under
certain conditions aet forth therein, including the oondition Ulat
the user thereof agree to pay to such aunicipality an •ount B&lffi-
cient to pny, when due, the principal, interest and pr•iua, if any,
on such bonds, and any other ape~• incurred by the 11unicipal1ty in
connection therewith, such bOnd& to be payable solely fraa the rev.-
nuea der iYed f raa payaenta to the aunicipal ity by the user of the
project 1 end
WHEREAS, the Brady Corporation Cthe •corporation"), on
behalf of ~rolley Square Aper~nta Associates, Ltd,, e Colorado
liaited partnership, to be organized end exist under the l.,s of the
State of Colorado I the "Partnership"), h88 pre~~ented to the Issuer a
propoul whereby the Iaa .. r will, purauant to the Act, i .... the rev-
enue bonds hereinafter described and loan the proceeds therefraa to
the Partnecahip to finance the s(JiuisiUon, oonlltruction and iaprov-
ing of e residential rental facility consisting of approxiaately 200
apertaenta units, propo~~ed to be located within the City, 88 well u
all real estate, fixtures and equipaent necessary or convenient
therefor !collectively, the "Project"), which Project will be located
within the boundaries of the Issuer and qualifies as a •project•
-2 -
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
within the •eaning of the Act in that auch facilitiea are auitable
for reaidential rental housing, and
WHEREAS, the Corporation hae repreaented to the City that
the Project will be deaigned to qualify aa a •project• within the
•eaning of the Act 1 and
WHEREAS, the City coneidotra that the Project, if located
within the City, will provide •ore adequate residential housing
facilitiea for low -and •iddle-inco•e f .. iliea and peraona 1 and
WHERE.AS, the City haa conaidered the Partnerahip'a pro-
po .. l and hu concluded that the econo~~ic and other benefit& to the
City will be aubatantial and that it wiahea to proceed with the
develop.ent and financing of the Project1 and
WHEREAS, the "City of Inglewood, Colorado, "ulti-r .. ily
Rouaing "ortgage Revenue Bond& !Trolley Square Apert.enta Project)
1985 Seriea A,• in an aggregate principal a.ount of not exceeding
f50,000,000 lthe "Bonde" I, will be haued, aold and delivered bY the
Iaauer to Capital "-rket Corporation, Inc. of Denver, Colorado and
Aaaociatea It he •origi,..l Purchaaera• I, to pcovide f .... d& to finance
the Project, and to pey certain incid&ntial costa incurred in connec-
tion with the iuuance of the llonda1 and
WHERI.AS, there have been preaented to the City eo .... cil of
the Ieauer: lal a propoaed for• of Financing Agr-nt to be dotted
aa of Nov .. ber 1, 1985 (the "Financing Agreeaent•), between the
Iaauer and the Partnerahip and lbl a propoaed for• of Indenture of
Truat to be dated a a of Novetlber 1, 1915 Cthe "Indenture" I, between
-3-
•
I • •
•
•
• •
the Ieeuer end a bank to be named by reaolution of the Iesuer, as
tr.-tae It he "Trustee• 1.
-, 'niEIIEPOJIE, BE IT OIIDAINt:D BY 'niE CITY CXIUICIL IF 'I'll£
CITY OF IIC>LIWOOD, CCI.OIIADO 'niATa
sastign 1. All action <not inconeietent with the provi-
aione of thie Ordirwncel heretofoce taken by the City Co~a~cil and the
effocte of tbe laeuer directed toward financing the Project, the
ieauance and aale of the Bonde therefor, and loaning the proceeds
thereof to the Partnerahip therefor be, and the aa•e hereby are,
ratified, approved and confi~d.
Sest!gn 2. Tbe Iaauer aball finance the Project, includ-
ing the p~ing of incidental iaauance eapenau and, if neceaury, a
portion of the intereat to accrue on the Bond&, by depositing the
proceed& of the Bonde with the '1\'uatee, the proceed& of which will be
disbursed by the Trustee for auch purpoaes in accordance with the
provieiona and conditione of the Indenture.
Sestiop J. To defray the coat of financing the Project,
the paying of incidentiel ieauence expeneee, and, if neceeaery, a
portion of the intere10t to accrue on the Bond&, there h hereby
authorized and created en ieeue of reven~~e bonds desigl'lllted ae the
"City of Englewood, Co10fado, Nu1ti-Pa•ily llouaing Mortgage llevenue
Bonde <Trolley Square Apart.ente Project) 1!185 Series A,• in the
aggregate pcincipel •ount oL not exceeding fSO,ooo,ooo, to be dated
ae of Nove.ber 1, 1985. Tbe Bonde ahall bear intereet fraa their
date payable ae•iennual1y ca..encing on Key 1, 1986 and on each
llov•ber 1 and Key 1 thereafter until -turity oc priOJ recleption at
-·-
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
the rates, and the Bonds shall •ture on the dates and in the ~unt.a
Mt forth in the Suppl•ental Reeolution to be edo~ed IJV the lMuer
on the date of the aale of the lllonda (the "Su(lpl-ntal .. aolutlon"l,
provided. however, that the initial net effective inter .. t rates on
the Bonds shall not exceed 9.00' per annua.
'ftle Bonds ahall be subject to redea~ion •• set forth in
the Indenture, and shall be issuable solely •• fully re9iatered
bonds, all in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture.
The Bonds shall be in aubatenthlly the fora provided for
in the Indenture. 'ftle llonda shall be sold to the Ori9inal I'Urd\-ra
for a purchase price eet forth in the &uppl-ntal Resolution. all in
accordance with a Bond Purchase A<)r-ent to be appt"oved by the
Suppl-ntal lteaolution.
Sactigo •· The followin9 deterainetiona and findift98 ere
hereby .. de in a c cordance with the Act :
Ia) The Issuer is authorized by the Act to enter
into the Financin9 A9reeaent for the public purpoMa
expressed in the Act, and to aMiCJII ita interest therein to
the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture;
lbl The Iaauer has aade the neceaury arran')eaenta
with the Partnership for the eatabliahaent within the
boundar iea of the Issuer ~ the Project. oonaiatiR9 of cer-
tain property aore fully described in the Financin9
A<)reeaent. which vill be of • character described in, and
will accoapliab certain public purposes cont•plated by,
the Act;
-5-
•
I • •
•
•
• •
lcl ~he Bonds shall be limited obll9ations o f the
Issuer. The principal of, pc .. iua, if any, and interest
shall be payable solely out of the revenues derived fro•
the Financin9 A9re .. ent. The Bonds and interest thereon
shall not conatitute a venera! obli98tion or an indebted-
nasa of the Iaauer within the -•nin<J of ·~ provision or
li•itstion of the Constitution or atatutes of the State of
Colorado, or the Charter of the City, and aha11 .. ver a>n-
stitute nor 9ive rise to a pecuniary liability of the
Iaauer or • c:bar9e S<Jainat ita 4J8neral credit oc tadng
powers. •either the faith and credit nor the tadn9 power
of the Isauer, the State oL Colorado or ~ other IX)litic:al
subdiviaion thereof, 1a pledged to the ~nt of tbe prin-
cipal of the Bonds or the interest thereon or other a>ata
incidental thereto 1
ldl ~he ••ount necessary in each year to pay the
principal of and the interest on the Bonds will be Ht
forth in the Supple•ental Reaolution sa Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference, and the Financing
Agree•ent requires auch pay•ents to be ••de by the
Partnership; and aince the Financing Agreaaent provides
that the Partnership shall .. intain the Project and carry
certain inaurance with reapect thereto, no dete~ination of
the eatl•ated coat of .. intaining or inaurinq the Project
need be .. de 1 and
-6-
•
I .
-
•
•
•
•
• •
lel The revenue& of the Partnerahip will be
aufficient to, and that the Pinancin9 Agre .. ent providea
that the Partnerahip ah•ll, ~ all taaea which~ be due
and owing with reapect to the Project.
lcctlgn 5. The for••• ter•• and proviaione of th•
Financing Agree.ent •nd the Indenture be, and they hereby are,
BPSKoved, and the Ieauer llhall enter into the rh*'el"'J llgr-nt ~
the Indenture, aubatantially in the f« .. ~ -.cto ~ aldl ma.enta
pre•nted at thia •eeUng but with •eh •inor c:bM98a therein aa are
eonaiatent herewith and aa tlle offican of the 1-r -cuting aucb
tSoc-nta ah•ll approve their e•cution thereof bel"'J de-.1 oonclu-
ahe of thai r approval of any auch eha"'J8&1 or with auch other
Chan988 aa ahall be approved in tbe 8uppl-ntal Reaolution and the
Kay or of the Iaauar h hereby ~II« i•ed and directed to eKecute and
deliver aucb docu.enta and the Ex Officio City Clerk/Treaaurer il
hereby autbor hed •nd directed to •ff h the ••I of the Iaeuer to,
and to •tteat, aueh docu.enta in 8ubatantial1y the f-of Mc:h of
auch doeu•enta preaented •t thia •eeting.
S.stign 6. The for•, ter.a and provhiona of the Bonde,
in aub8tanti8lly the for• contained in the Indenture, be and they
hereby •re, •pprovedr and the Nayor h here~ autborbed and directed
to eauae hh faeai•ile aign•ture to be affbad to the 1110nd111 the £a
Officio City Clerk/Tre•aurer ia hereby •uthori•ed and directed to
atteat the Bonde with hie faeai•ile aignature, and each ia •uthori•ed
to deliver the Bonde in the fom contained in the Indenture but with
auch •lnor ch•n98• therein •• are conaiatent with the Indenture and
-7-
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
thia Ordinance end •• the officer• of the Iaau~r executin9 the Bonde
ahell approve, their execution thereof beln9 deeaed conclualve of
their approul til arrt auch change a. '1'lw •al til the Iuuer h hereby
autborhed and directed to be affixed to« iapcinted on the aonda.
§cctlgo 1. The Mayor of the Iaauer 1& hereby autborlaed
to a tr ... t coapany or bank in IJDOd atandi"9• u Tn•t .. , bOnd re<)ie-
trar and peyln9 a9Bnt, the execution til the Indenture by the lMuer
bein9 conclualve evidence of the appointaent of the Truatee.
&ect;lpn 1. The officer& of the Iaauer ahall take all
action which they dNa ne~-ry cc r•mnably required in confor-ity
with the Act to finance the conatruction and iaprov-nt of the
Project which ia hereby authorhed, 1ncludi"9 tba payi"9 of inciden-
tial iaauance eapenaes froa the proceed& of the aonde, and for
carryi09 out, 9lvin9 effect to and cona~atift9 the tranBActlona
conteapleted by thia Ordinance, the rinancin9 A9re-nt and the
Indenture, includi"9 without lialltation the aecution and delivery til
any cloain9 doc.-enta to be delivered in connection with the Bale end
delivery of the Bonde.
&cctlon '· The coat of financin9 the Project, lncludin9
the peyin9 of incidental hauance expen••• will be peld out of the
proceed& of the Bonde. The Bonde t.,..ether with interest payable
thereon are apecial, Halted obligation• of the I .. uer payable aolely
•• provided in the Indenture. '1'lw Bonde or inter eat payele thereon
aball never conatitute the debt or indebtedneae of the Iuuer, the
State of Colorado or any political aubdivi&lon thereof within the
aeanin9 of any provi&ion or liaitation of the conetitution or
-·-
•
I .
-
•
•
•
• •
atatutea of the State of Colorado, or the Charter of the City, nor
ahall anything contained in thia Ordinance oc in the Bonds, the
Financing Agree.ent, the Indenture or any othec inatru.ent constitute
oc give ciae to • pecuniary liability of, or a charge against the
general credit or taxing power of, the Iaauer, noc ahell the breach
of any agreeaent contained in thia Ordinance, or any of the above-
8entioned docu8enta oc inatru .. nta i8poae any pecuniary liability
upon the Iaauer, tbe Iaauer hevl.ng no powec to pay out of ita general
fund, or otherviae contribute any part of tbe coata of finanCing the
Project, nor ahall the laauer conde.n any additional land or otber
pcoperty for the Project nor contribute any land or other propecty to
tbe Project.
8ection 10. After any of the Bond a are haued, thia
Ordinance ahall be and ceaain irrepealable until the Bonds and
intereat theceon ahall have been fully paid, cancelled and
diacharged.
8ect.ipn 11. lf any aection, paragraph, clauae or
pcoviaiona of thla Ordinance ahall for any reason be held to be
invalid or unenfocceabla, the imralidity or unenfoccellbillty of auch
section, pacagcaph, clauae or provlaion ahall not effect any of the
ceaaining provisions of thia Ordinance .
&cct.ipn 12. All bylave, ordera, reaolutiona and
ocdinancea, oc parte thereof, inconaiatent hecevith and vith the
docu-nta hereby approved, are hereby repealed to the extent only of
auch lnconaiatency . t'bia repealec ahall not be conatrued M revivin<)
any bylav, order, resolution oc ordinance, or part thereof.
_,_
•
I .
-
•
•
•
• •
Section 13. Imnediately upon its final passage, this
Ordinance shall be recorded in the City bool< of ordinances kept for
that purpose, shall be authenticated by the signatures of the Player
and the Ex officio City Clerl<-Treasurer, and shall be p.lbliahed in
the Englewood Sentinel, a legal newspaper of general circulation in
the City.
Section 14. Insofar as it is necessary to issue the b<nls
i.mnediately in order to:
l. tal<e advantage of presently ex i sting interest rates;
2. take advantage of the legal authority to issue this type
of bord, wh i c h authority may not continue to exist after
Dec:enber 31, 1985;
3. IIUppOrt the C1 ty and the Urban Renewal Authority in
effect i ng in a timely ~~r thei r planned financing of
downtown renewal projects;
the provisi ons of th i s Ordinance are hereby declared to be
necessary for the imned i ate preservation of p.lblic property,
heal th, peace or safety and shall becane effective upon final
passage in &..."'CCrdance "i th Ti tle V, Section 41, of the IIane Rule
Charter of the Ci ty of Eng l ewood, Colorado.
I ntrodiJC'ed, read i n full , and pas&ed on tint reading on the
28th day of October , 1985.
Publ i shed as a Bill f or an ~di nance on the 30th day of
October, 1985 .
Attest:
ISlijeile L. ob s, Hayor
ex off1c 1o Clty Cler k-Treasllrer
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex o f!tcto Ctty Clerk-Treasurer of the
C>ty o f Eng l ewood, Co lorado, hereby certtfy that the above and
forego i ng is a true , a ccurate and canp1ete copy of a Bi 11 for an
Ordi nance, introdiJC'ed , r ead in f ull , and passed a s a n emergency
ord i nance on f>rat read >ng on the 28th d ay o f October, 198 5 .
-10-
•
I • •
n
•
•
• •
lt vee thereupon •oved by Council•eabec and
eeconded by Council•e•bec that the foregoing
Ordinance which vee introduced at thia .. eting, aa afoceaaid, be
publiehed by publiehing the ordinance in full, together vith a
etate .. nt that the te•t ie available foe foe public inepection and
acquieition in the office of the C.-officio City Clecktrceaaucec, in
the IAglcygod &cptioel, a o~c of 98ftecal circulation publiehed
in the City, and that eaid Ordinance be cooaidered for final paaaage
at a regulae •eeting of the City Council to be held at Council
Cba8bece, on Ronday, ----------• 1115, et the hour of 7•30 P·•·
~he queetion being upon the adoption of eaid .ation, tbe
coll vee celled vith the following ceeult•
~ee voting Aye;
~hoee Voting Nay•
,.hoee Abeent•
•eabere of the City Council having voted in
favor of eaid action, the pcaeiding officer thereupon declared eaid
action carried, and eaid Ordinance ordered publiahed aa eforeeaid.
•
I • •
•
•
• •
,.he Council then considered other buaine&a. !t>ereafter, on
.ation duly aade, aeconded and adopted, the aeettng waa adjourned.
I SEAL)
At teats
Ea-officio City Clerk/,.reaauer
CJ'fY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLOIUIDO
llayor
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF 1\RAPAIIOE aaa
CITY OF EIIOLDIOOO
1 Gary R. li,.t>ee. tbe &~ly choaen, qualified and actin<.~ £a-
Officio City Clerk/Treaaurer of the City of En9lewood, Colorado Ctbe
•ctty•l, do hereby certify a
1. That the foregoing pagea nuabered 1 to 10, both
incluaive, are true, perfect and cc.plete oopiea of the reCOI"d of tbe
proc:eecUnga of the City Council of tbe City lt.he -council•), in..hr
•• aaid ainutea relate to an ordinance, a true copy of which ia
hereinbefore aet forth, had and taken at a regular -•ting of the
Council, held at Council Cblllben, on Oct.ober 22, 1985 at the hour of
7a30 p.a, aa recorded in the regular official book of reoocda of tbe
proceeding• of the Council kept in ay office, and that aaid
proceeding• were &lly had and taken a• therein allown.
2. That the .. eting therein ahown waa duly held, that tbe
peraona therein naaed a& prennt at Mid aeettng vere preaent aa
allown by aaid ainutea, and that all ..-... of the Council were duly
notified of Mid aeeting.
WlTIIESS ay hand and the •al of tbe City of EncJl•ood u of
CITY OP EIIGLDIOOO, (X)LORADO
IS SAL I
!a-Officio Ci ty Clerk/Treaaurer
•
I •
•
•
• •
(Attach affidavit of publication of ordinance after firlt
uadin9)
•
I • •
-
•
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNrY OF AJIAPAHOE aa 1
CITY OP ENGLEWOOD
•
• •
The City Council of the City of Engl~. Color8do, held a
regular .. eting open to the public at Council ~ra in Engl~,
Colorado, on Ronday tha day of October 1115 at tbe hour of 7130
P·•·
~he following ae~era of the City Council were preaent1
llayor 1
llayor Pro Tea:
Council ll~era1
The following aeabera of the City Council were abaent1
The following paraona ware alao preaent•
Thereupon, the following proceeding&, aaong othera, were
had and taken.
The £a-Officio City Clerk/Treaaurer announced that an
ordinance entitled •
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIIING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE Of NOT
EXCEEDJIIG f50,000,000 CITY OP ENGLEWOOD, COLOIIADO, IIULTl-
PAMILY HOUSING MORTGAGE REVBNUE BONDS (~OLLEY SQUARE
APARTMENTS PROJECT! 1985 SERIES A, TO PINANCE PROPERTY
SUITABLE FOR USE fat RESIDBII'I'IAL UHI'AL P110Ja:'!'S1 MTIFYIIIG
CERTAIN ACYJOIIS HERB'l'CI'OIIE 'r'M£111 AIJftiORIIUG ftE IUCOTlotl
AND DELIVERY BY THE CITY Of A PINANCIIIG AGREEMENT AND
INDENTURE OP TRUST, lAID BO!mS Aim CLOSING DOCUMENTS IN
CONNECYION THERIWI'nll Aim UPIALIIIG IICTIOII B~ 'I'NtEN
IN CONFLICY HEREWITH.~~~ ~,-t J.-01
which ordinance wee, Oc:tobe~ 1915, introduced and ordered
publiehed •• a propoeed ordinance, had, aa ordered by the COuncil,
been publiahed in full in the £nqleyoo4 5tntiptl, a newepepec of
general circulation in tht City of Inglewood, and that tbe
publiahece' affidavit of publication of atid Ordinance 1s nov on filt
in tht office of tht la-Dfficio City Cleck/Tceaaurec.
Thereupon, aaid Ordinance wta cetd in full foe the aecond
Councilaeaber tben aoved thtt atid
Ordinance heretofore introduced and publithed be now fintlly petted
and adopted •• read. Councilaeaber ---------------aeconded the
aotion. The question being upon the peeaage and adoption of aaid
Ordinance, the roll waa celled with the following reaulta•
Thoae Voting Aye •
•
I .
-
•
•
• •
'J'be preeidiag officer thereupon declared that a .. jorlty of
the ..-berahip of the Council having voted in favor thereof, the
•otion vae carried and the Ordinance duly and finally paaaed and
adopted •• raad.
After conaideretion of other buaineaa to ca.. before the
Council, the -ttng vu edjourned on -uon duly Mde, .aconded end
..Sopted.
IS&ALI
Attest a
Ex-officio City
Cled:/Treasurer
Cl!'Y OF INGL!IiOCil, COLORADO
•
I • •
-
(
•
STATE Of COLORADO
COUNTY Of AAAFIIHOE
ClTY OF &ICOL.DIOCID
•••
•
• •
1, Gary B. Bi<Jbee, tne &>ly q•Hfled lind acting &a-officio
City Clork/Tr ... urer of tbe City of 1ft91ewood (herein tbe •city" I, in
tbe county of Arapahoe an4 &tate of Colocado, do hereby cartlfy:
1. Ordinance No. __ , waa introduced and ordered publiabed
aa a propo•d ordiMnce at a r0191lar -ung of tne City Council bald
on llonday, October 22, 1915, and waa publiabed in full in the
E;ng1WM4 Sept;ilw1, a neV8papu of ~Jeneral cJ raahtion in the City.
2. After aucto publication, at a reC)Ular -tln9 of tbe City
Co..,cil bdd on -----
__ , 1915, aid ordiMnoe wu
then finally paa•d, adoptad, epprOMd and ordered publiabed by title
end atat~ent in tbe Eng11WQQ4 sept;lpcl.
l. At the .eetift'J referred to in para9raph 2, the .-.hera
of the City Council were preaent and voted on the paaaa9e of
OrdiMnce llo. __ , •• ln aaid ainute& aet forth, an4 aaid ord1Nnca
waa published by title and atat-nt in tne r.pglcygp4 fieptipcl, tbe
aaae hein9 the official newspaper of the City, and of 9eneral
circulation therein.
4. Ttle ordinance wu not .. ended after ita imro&>ction on
flnt reading.
5. Ttle fore4JC)ift'J pa9ea nuabered froe 1 to 10, lncluaive,
are a true, full and couect copy of the proeeedin9a of tbe City
Council of the City inaofer •• aaid ainutea relate to tbe final
adoption of Ordinance No. __ , and to the aubject aatter therein
deai9nated, a copy of which Ordinance i& aet fot:th in full in the
ainutea of the aeeting held on October 22, 1985, and a <»PY of whlc:b
•
I • •
(
•
•
• •
ia likeviaa attached to the affidavit of publication on file in ~
office.
6. ___ •e•bera of the City Council vera preaant at the
October 22, lt15 .. etin9 and ___ .. ~,. of tha City Council ware
praaant at the , ltl5 .. atin9. All -..bera of tbe City
Council vera duly notified of aaid .. atin9a.
7. Said ordinance waa ai9ned, atteated and recorded in
accordance with the charter and lava of tba City and State of
Color ..So.
IN WI~ESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto aet •Y hand and the
aeal of aaid City of lnglevood, aa of -----------
C I'I'Y 01' &IIGLEWOOD, COLORADO
I SEAL I
£a-officio City Clerk/~raaaurer
•
I • •
-
•
STATE OP' COLORADO
COUNTY or ARAPAHOE au
CITY Of ENGLEWOOD
•
• •
I, Gary R. Higbee, the duly .... lifted and .cti119 la-officio
City Clerk/Treaaurer of Inglewood, Colorado, do hereby cectify that
the foC890i"9 pe<Jea, incluaive, CONititute a true and con.ct copy of
the Recocd of the Pcoceedinga of the City Council of the City,
adopted at cegular .. etinga of the City Council held at Council
Cha.bera in Englewood, Colocedo, on llanday, the 22nd dey of Oetobec,
U85, c~i119 at the houc of 7a30 P·•·• .nd ____ _. t.be-dey
of -------• 1915, ca..encing at the houc of 7al0 P·•·• all aa
reeocded in tbe official a.cocda of the Pcoceedinga of the City kept
in -r offica, inaofac aa aaid proceeding• relate to tbe ocdinance
tbeceon contained, tbat aa1d proceeding• were duly bad and taken1
tbat the .. eting waa duly bald1 and that tba pec.ana wece pceaent at
aaid aeeting aa thecein ahovn.
WIT•Ess ay band and aeal of -r office aa of the day of
------· 1115.
CITY or EIIGL.EWOOD, COLORADO
Ex-officio City Cleck/Tceaaurec
I SEAl. I
•
I • •
•
•
• •
(Attach affidavit of publication of ordinance by title aa finally
adopted aftec aecond and final ceadingl
•
..
I • •
-
•
•
•'
STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE
ClTY OF Et«;LDIOOD
....
•
• •
The City Council oL the City of lnglwood, Colorado, held a
regular -eUng open to the public at Council Ch-.era ln Dlglw~.
Col ora do, on llonday the 22nd .s.y of October uas at the hour ot 7, 30
p •••
The foll011ing ••beca of the City Council were preaent:
Mayor :
Mayor Pro Ta:
Councll-bera:
The following •e•bera of the City Council were Abaent:
The fol1011ing person& were Al&o present:
Ordi1111nce No. _ waa read in full and, and no objection•
being aade, the Mayor announced that a aecond reading on Ordi1111nce
No. _ would be held on • 1985.
•
I • •
•
• -
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY --------
Moved Seconded Ayes l Nay Absent Abstain
Hlgdav
Neal
Vobe da I
Weist /
Bllo 7
v Bradshaw v Otis
MOTION:
I •
• •