HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-04-24 (Special) Meeting Agenda• -
• •
• •
0
City Council Meeting -Special
April 24, 1984
• •
-
•
•
• •
,WENDA FOR THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF
THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
1\PRIL 24, 1984
5:30P.M. /~ Call to order.~·'f{ .
1. Conaideration f ~ ;
the 3300 o amendment block of s to parking 1 outh Acoma S ease in
2. Adj treet.
ANDY KC COWN
City Kanaaer
AM/dd
ournment.
•
I
-
•
•
• •
NOTICE OF CALL BY THE MAYOR
FOR A SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 1984
The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado, is called to a special meeting at City Hall, 3400
South Elati Street, at 5:30 p.m. for the purpose of considering
an amendment to a parking lease in the 3300 block of South
Acoma Street. An agenda detailing the nature of this business
is attached.
4~~~
EUGENE L. OTIS
Mayor
ELO/dd
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE
The following persons, all Council Members of the City of
Englewood, do hereby acknowledge receipt of notice of the
above special session.
,4'¥""'~~~~~
~~Jts~,
~fitil -.:~.J ~ 0~.v
a~
•
0
I • •
.....
(
COU NCIL CHAMBERS
City o f' Englewood,COl o r ado
April 24 , 1984 lh
SPE.., •~L MEETINQ ·
The Ci t~ Council of the Cit~ of Englewood, Arapahoe Count~,
Color ado , met in 5pecial ••••ion on April ~24, 1984, at ': 30 p .m.
Mayor Otis, presil!ing, c ~led .!!!.•_m••ting to order .
The invocation was given by Council Member Higday .
of dttegia nc• was led by Mayor Otis .
The pledg•
Mayor Otis asked for roll call .
foltow1ng were present :
Upon a call of the roll, the
Cou ncil Members Higday, Neal. VobeJda, Weitt, Bilo , Bradshaw.
Otil .
Absent : Non ct .
The Ma~or declared a quorum present .
* *
Also present were :
* *
* * * * *
*
City Man•g•r McCown
City Attorn•~ Olsen
Assistant City Manager Vargas
Director of Com.unity Development Powers
Deputy City Clerk Owen
* * * *
Mayor Otis stated the purpose of the meeting was to consider an
amenoment to the parking I•••• ~the 3300 block of South Acoma Street . vn
•
If
~
---
-
-
--
--·---
-----
---,
....
'
j;
·:1
;' ,,
I" "' j,,~ ,.,
r·
t':: .
' ..
_J!i
fj
·" ,,
--I
-
--------,
~
'I t, 11
~··
.
"!..,
.,! ,,
"
•
·t
L
Ap r 1 l 2 4 , 1984
Pa g~ 2
.....,
and i
4lfld it -----we oqen the mee ~ng at 5 :30 P ym~nd
Just( isn't r · t, an~ if you would
I'd rea be grate~
-uu_
~~~~~~
~~
Council Member Neal stated another issue was the resolution of
th em having some substantial right to renew the lease after 20 years and ~
how that was resolved .
'•
~ ..
1.,
{ii
"I
{
_r.l
In:
)Ol
}I
!"
t'' --t'"l
}:II:
b•
.!"'
!41 ~,!
l.Jt
"'
-~--r.
Council Member Bilo asked if the right to purchase was an
op t 1 on
-1., ~
''J"!
·:
f
~·
"' i"-'': ... ... . ..
z:
•'
:: ..
1984
Council Member Neal a sk ed i f that was an outright option or an
optLon contin ge n t upon a futur e C ouncil declining to renew.
Cit~ A ttorn e ~ Ols e n s tated it would be an outright option to
sell not to l e ase . Mr Ols e n not ed the arrival of Mr . Deacon .
Bruce Deacon. attorn e~ wi th Calk i ns, Kramer , Qr i mshaw &c Harr i n g.
represen~ B u d d , came forward . Mr . Deacon transmitted the
r e vise d •· prov1 w
the d e velo per has a b ilit~ to be there for approximate!~ 1' ~wars plus one
renewal term so the maximum time t he de v eloper could be there without
getting furth e r consent from the Ci t ~ is 2 0 ~ears . ~6Jh's •• ~eftew afteT
..... ,a Pt I " o P tt m• b ut Uiil V :i r thay ••• tsha eaflle•nt a' ta.e Gi••· -WheiT-
:::: :::: -~al pwPillcli lie the IWCOiid I WIIWe&l pii 1Ud
...__-~-----
~~~~~
• r g1v w n ot i ce to the C~t~j~ ~a~~~bw~orw the end
of the current renewa l t e rm and then the Cit~~~ after that , _A_
notice •• deli u e• to eith e r consent or ,':ll'!...cp§!S(!l.t . U the City ~ d.d /4~ ~
~•• sew •"•'"'~• *heft the r e n ewal er i o 1f~_~t~vwffect . I f the C i ty ~~~ . ~~~·~-
••ve ~e thill t h e renewal pe riod. 1nto effwct . T NII •• llhwt · a-~·---'· -a--·-----,
~ if the City the renewal that would trigger
an opportunity for th e t e n ant to purchase the propwrty at its fair ma r ket
value at the end of the cur re n t r enewal period 11111e:ld II., ....,he fai r
market v a lue would be eith e r determined i n acc~dance with agreement o f
th• p•rties or W that &&aii 't ;umatlninl tb,'J CA"'d ·•••• qp tt.e~ ••a.l• 11
through a method of being ap p ra is ed us i ng three appraisor s . Tllell lllcthocf
.. , •• ,,._, app;wtwa t i u '"' ••"'• mcthe4 •hat uau uwwd latwr lri thi d·&'····
...;'
"II ]
~IZ
" ~u!
•: .. r
~~
" ., .,
" ~-
f
-------~·
"'
"' ~· r
" "'i ~·· "'
"
"'
In respons e to Counci l Membe r H i gday 's ~uestion , Mr . Deacon
stated Brady h a d an option to renew up through 20 ~ears s o after the 15
or lo years wh e never the p e rio d end s, i f he wanted to renew1 c ol}.s~t f r om
the Cit11 woul d not b e r e~ui red at that point because the idea .R-t·o h a ve ~y _ 1 _
the abiht11 to lean it for u p to ;zo 11urs without •-a;a~haddtJi(n~I!!"1P .,. ~ /.L . L. ~ ~~ tJ ~
consent . &..11 vu uu11t to hen •• Jeyond :ZO 11wars ,; I ~~~ n' _
C"a ftiUii iJ r: Gila tbe ,,.,. I , •tuu &,., 1•'!11 1118 ..... ••igge; I t'he ~ ---~~!
opport"D l t\1 o ' • p ur c h•s• ap ti ... at talt Mlflit V81 01 .
Council Member Weist a s ked if a t the end of ;zo years wou l d the
lease also be at fair market v a lu e o r be a continuation of the term s of
the first .
•
~ •
r
""I
• t r~
•
(
Apr1l 24,
Page 4
1984
~ Mr Deacon stat ed cont1nuation of the terms wh ich ~the initial
amount , then the fa1r market valu e adJUstments at 47. rate -4 tliell" every
four years t1f-CPI increases .
De referred ~o th~ lease statJ ng er•.wa !. a 0r~ edure
h w that ia structure d in terms tim1ng for, f the
an 't renew, th~eveloper then as a per i od time in
hether or not h wants to exercise the option ~
not bound to y-it .
Mr . Deacon
the parti
Mr .~·ac~ atated there were chant•• of dates~ ~~v ision
maviet val Qe to~~ the datea with ~~h ~~Justment is~·~ on
Mr . Dea n n ted a correction to~~y the terms of payi~g .
Th right of fi r st re uaal for the deve f oper t purchaae the la n dlord's
in ereat in the prope ty in the event the City doea deal with some third
pa ty . r . Deacon at ted he ina erted language to clarify that right
ahou exiat during th ~~i~d of time the lea ia tn enforce . ------
change ahould bw on ~age 9 which was
h ia indeanfty from ~. tenant fn
In paragraph 11 imm e41ately following there ia a ~inor i n the
ine where there is a carr~t ia simply to correct a ry error in the
f paragraph 8 ~ich ia haa been changed . The title of the
parag aph is only Finance . In language in that same section that says
that a tranafer to an entity i~ which Mr . Brady is involved has been
revi ed to ••~entity which h ·is general partner which .he has
sub tantial ~nerahip in . A ao ia added which aaya in ~eapect to
aaa gnees ~ the Brady in te eat , the tenant'• intereatt aa those as to
whic lan dlord 's consen is re~uired ia the, that aaaignee must
provid• a-r easonable •viden e to ~t~landlord th•t the assignee has the
•
I
--
f ~~~~~~! ~~~~Y~:t A
r!'r0 .
L-
1 .•.
--l'-1:' li ,,
'I .. I
~· ~·
~· "
"' ~ ~ -t~tw LlAka: ~;
-. ..., . t
J ttu {1 ~
~ a-~
d.J__ef. ~
~~~;&7XJ ~:I ---1
~I
Zl
'•
~¥
.,j
A£.!.11 24 , 1984
P•ge ~
~ --------fl~ncial ~•c1 t~ Us1ng s tand•rd .ecounting ~inciplws consis~ntl~ _.p~_!!!!wt thw Qb 1 ig_•!J.orrs of thw twnant U"!der the pound lwase .
Page 3 H. tenth
th•t it re•d has• of'f'•~ t
--
Mr . Deacon st•twd additional ch•nges •ppeared on pagw 10. D. to ~(
simp!~ ~. languagw of' rwnt being paid in adv•nc•·___________---U 0
STAR T PAQE 9
~auu-d-.J.fJ
with
Qe•fteil "•~~~~ Ne•l•rd if introduced at this meeting . -· compromise l•ngu•g• would be
th
Council Member N••l suggested limiting the time in which they
could assign it .
M•vor Otis decl•r•d • recwss at 6 :~0 p .m. Council reconvenwd at
7 :00 p .m. Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of' thw roll. the
following were present :
par•gr
Council Member Higday. N••l• vobeJda. Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw.
Otis .
Absent : Nonw .
Thw Mayor declared a quorum preswnt .
and sta.t'ed
~J~ I
·----.-------~
~ '•I J
,•
' I' ~ :10/
" ! .. ,
I ~~
I"' li
1 .. "' "' ·--I , ..
~
jl\'
~
1 t -I
~
» ~
~ ,' r ft
~ r J ~
j 4
·~
~ ~~
i R
r~
l p
~
t' ~·:
~
~
J
-
•
April 24, 1984
Page 6
•
• •
ed the idea is to reGeive -;-
epaid but was aJter the term ' ation
ere was a minor change in pa aqraph
the addition l thin ~p ut into the lea e in
form lease sH we end up recording one.
that ~iOd~
of the ~ease call-
2 which is simply
spect to what we
City Attorney Olsen stated he a concern on page 2 , paragraph F ,
it appeared to be an automatic renewal if the City does not act/ within 15
days. That is an amazingly short time for a muni cipality to act or not ~
act. ~'@ :l:a difficu 1 $ fgr a not fw.ll t:itfte eoaueil to meet and make a cruc1al
decision like that ili 15 d&J'!5 nit~ tbe prep&r rpcgrd l;>QiRtj "'aQe, liE W8!5
worried that that might mean upon il fwt.wrQ ConRocil xeuereif'HJ aototuatic renewal
and if it did me~n tllilt then that wpnld iii uiglat!ieA of the tnatter. Mr. Olsen
asked Mr Deacon to di&CW.i'li pjth tbg Council the possibilit:y of ma)tliJg that
...a long tem .-eSw.FR period dpring uAigA 1s:Ae Cettueil cotsld cDIISEJIL uz noi: or
"' sbnpl~ eliminatoin~ Sli& atteeooaeie na'ettre ef i~ a~oi ]!ltt'etoil'!~ iR "l7&<f'li.&:i.ng
the Co\lReil to meet 011 Ute saLject i11 fU!Ii'Rilp& il iQ Eia} peried te di:5ct~:5a it!'
'1:16eR Qetirteil wot:rl:O have to have Lime to ask staff i£ theze weze additional lea!lee s
pgteatially iu the market place that they would want to lease lt.. He COal~
not jmagina CQ\IAGil fj pdj og another tea See fof a ffiajOt parcel like Lha t iii
~-Mr. Olsen stated it ~uld not be an automatic renewal if the Council
does not act.. M bst!ne:il doe!l uet act during that period it is fqr a gpad rea-
s au tHat they a1e COIICEtiied ..
~ It was the consensus that a 30-day time period be allowed.
!)' Mr. Olsen fu:rF~~ ~t.~ted two other i terns. One related •e~o~it.-Mpii!"'l~'~;l;r,o&IIJo to
whether~the Council ~w~to create the right for Brady to purchase after
20 years which would be irreservsible. Meaning the Council would have to sell
if a reasonable market offer were made.. M.ir II?Pt to ana 1 )'Z& uhetheF '6he reueaue
liMWjl tgrm under the 1 aaoehold is what COWICll WOUld father haue t:ftaJJ selliuy
~ The second concern was over the assignability clause.
Mr .. Deacon stated ttl a g ·tv does not haye to Jet ru;, if the City lets
the developer renew, then no purchase option comes up unless the City is deal-
ing with a third party. So it does not mean automatically after 20 years~;here
is an automatjc purchase right. There~nly a purchase right ~ i• (;l&~ the
City declin ~to let the developer renew.
to
a
a
So re is t
developer, there is the interest of the
•
I .
""'
-..
......
.......
.......,
-..
April 24 . 1984
Page 3
----·--
----~--~-
City Attorn•y Ols•n stat•d it was an option that th•Y could
•••rc1s• und•r t•rmonolojy that would apprais• th• prop•rty to its
curr•nt valu• at that time. 20 vears from now . It would also creat• a
m•chanism by~hich we could submit an appraisal of our own; th•Y could;
and if w• dis~r••d th•n a neutral appraisor would be ••l•cted to --d•t•rmin
opt1on
sell not
Neal asked if that was an outright option or an
future Council declining to renew .
of option to
n .
Bruce Deac n. attorney with Calkins. Kramer• •• ....... ---· Harring.
repr•s•nting S . Bud radv· ca111e forward . I'll'. Deacon transm ed the
r•vis•d revision . Th changes we ~~~ad• in the terms were provide that
the dev•lop•r has abil tv to b• th•r• for approximatel ' vears plus one
ren•wal term so th• max mum time th• dev•loper could there without
g•tting furth•r consent rom th• Citv is 20 vears . ights to r•n•w after
that p•riod of tim• but o lV if th•V get th• con nt of the Citv . When
th•v co•• in for those r•n wal periods be the cond renewal period
thereafter. thev have to gi • notice to the tv 90 dav• before the end
of the current renewal ter111 nd then the tv has 1' dav• after that
notice is delivered to either not consent . If the Citv does
not sav anvthing then the rene goes into effect . If the City
says no then the renewal period go into effect . Th•n at that
point if the Citv would denv con t for the renewal that would trigger
an opportunity for the tenant rchase the propertv at its fair market
value at th• end of the curr 1 period would be . And the fair
market value would be eithe d in accordance with agre•m•nt of
the parties or if that wa th•V could agr•• on they would go
through a 111ethod of bei three appraisors . That method
of getting appraisal t t at was used later in the
docu111ent .
stated Brady ha an option to renew up through years so aft•r the 15
In resp we to ~ounc11 nemu••· n•11 ... 11 ~-----
or tb vears w never the period ends. if he want• o r•n•w consent from
the Citv wou ~ not b• r•,uired at that point b•cause ~· idea is to have
th• abilit to leas• it for up to 20 years without giving additional
nee vou want to l•as• it b•vond 20 vears vou hav• to g•t
om the Citv . If th• CitV savs no. that triggers the
itv of a purchas• option at fair mark•t valu•.
Council Me111b•r W•i•t asked if at th• end of 20 vears would the
l•as• also be at fair ~~~ark•t value or be a continuation of th• t•rms of
the first .
•
---
-
---~
--
---
.
101
II
--Jl\1
.:\
" -,,' ,.·
il:~
•I
"I aj
~I
--' -{,1 •
'"
•I
f'"'
•I
-· --i:l ..
~!
~ ~:j
,o
i::
'I
•I
'I
'•
•
A ril 24, 1984
Page 7
•
• -
;,..nk or finan c ial institwt.io11 is yotng t o fihdiice auy development plan iii whiCh
there-i s a rea=nable-pR>spee t to have the l:oau ii" @!!IY8Rt tlut t!.e~· pw t i nt:o t:hi!!!
.J:.Qpaif!. In ballltH~iR! tfteee tf:tiPHfe "'' eerteetrA i& that tt1e eity gets tltose t~
~ the City: the ze uePJtte !lettFee!J 1 greeery et:el!'e 1 e6e iut there is onfil tf:tiR~
tJ:uay are keeping here in additio n t o a rr thOSe t11111gs aoel: 'thae ie the basic vMue
e£ tli@ gzoaud tli&L Lh@y a.-e lea!!!in'!• I£ "@ w@£@ !!!@lliu'! @iii!!! '!~Bttnl!l t:a 81'Hi~·
at some ridjcgnsl y lgw pricg ilB Qenuer ftas EiBPU! iA the 81'iiyliR9 px-o j tHi't I tA i Ptk
~re 'KHtla a seueze qaestiou iaooloed. ~ giv i n g ~Br ady the right to pur-
c hase the p rop ert y in 20 year s at fa i r marke t va lue ~ g uarantee,( to the
c itize ns tha t they wil l r eceive the full ma r ket va lue fo r that land . ~
net lacking the c jtjzgp s iA 2 Q )'ears tg ~ceeiue !!e"'e fii888JAt9d price. The key
thing \il$tha t t he v alue of the grou nd be p r eserved fo r t he citizens benefit;
i f th e not the ~an d t hen the do lla r s a s we ll .as ge t~i n g ~~' ~~
G&WRB!:l f1eMeF tlaal &5aet!til t:he ussxqna'l:nl±LJ 0±8: Ret l!ethez lam 111
t erns 00'' ejther Brad y Aas to ltaoe a !lttb:!~aRtie:l iutezest Of has to p rove tFfe
finaPLeie:l 8i:fi'iiJeili:~, ef whee ·a.-i::! tekiug the asslymuent, ~Nea l f ~
comfo rtable with t+w ':laiy it Ras Jioon &et lllP• ~ ~
~-
shoul
the c·
they were providing two
Th e y c o uld e ithe r con-
the th i r d opt i on wa s if Brady is unabl e to p urc has e
ptio of attempting to release
ve a lease offer at a r ms
op t ion of matching that the
Mr. Olsen discussed the assignability clause . oMt:. Dt&LOII hd § tlidiigee
-the lBR'Jiila!e i11 that Ute &aucil i:! giuen t:tte zi~Jht: •• •PFli'ii'"C the ae:!iqtdnCht:r. "1 _
WJU.l t h at~ irad) be i11V01oed iR ~try assignment snbstantiall'' Tb;s sti 1 l ~ ~permi t:;rady to assign the lease to an entity which Council would have
no control over the select ion other than throu gh the gener al zoning provisions .
As a landlo/rd you could ask Mr . Deacon to provide a clause permitting veto
power over any assignment . a»wt j s the turnin'1 &' el! ill' t he r jfR~t fli&WI 13ra4J
to someone e l se penrits&iR~ Bzady to drap aws of t h e pi c tu r e wjth tlae Reo: obliL
~ti o n f aJ J i ng on t h e Pi lea see N¥ Doacgn does not aP\t t:e p111S el-la\ in and
: wan:
8 *:i::;·::11.d:: ::\~o~::i;::::: :::z::: :~: ::::w::i:: =~a;;,te:~i:~e: tJ/<\
n ee" &Wileasee tot llllaucial atstllty to pay the S it:' t:he reuc aue. Ml' 9le ..
s tated hp i1C cepte d that BE 3 1 A~al COJt:Siilera\i.eR iA *OTJPS and it wo uld gi"e
ee'e.t!Aci 1 tlta ~ri fl:tt if thA}' saw someone ··}tg li i ft "ot ar;peas. t:e h~or e ~e fiuauc i al
-:::11~1 ' ::d!n::l' &!Tal ua ti on to P~l aul!l if e uauc i l ~;·:rll ~R 8 ) wottll!l uot
l aav" a5 t .,Q !!!~ t o t:hetlh-But CouncJ.l should di~s l. t wants to have
blanket a u thority to veto any assignment state d jp h jg eMperie~e
•
I • •
•
•
"'
......
..
(
April 2 4 , 1 984
Page '
fin a nc ial c apa ci ty
a ppli•d t o m••t £
consist•ntly
ground l•ase .
C i ty Attorn•y ••n not• a chang• h• want•d on Pag• 3 H . t•nth
l i n• down you 'r• r•f•rrin to t • •••cution sol•lv of a l•a•• off•r from
a pot•ntial l•a••• not to th ••cution of a full 1••••· So on that
1 i n• ...
Mr . D•acon st~t• that was~t
would not r•ally know if. you had a d•a
with som•bodv and th•n • would hav• to
the term lease offer
characterized it . You
vou had signed a lease
Mr. Deacon stated he used
it .
the tenth l i n• dnwh • · -,------... __ --."-lease offer in
10, D. to
si•p.lv
----
------
-
---
---
-
--.... --
----
~-
--
-----
•
-----~
---r:
j:
' .
~:
'u;
'" !,,·
l~
"·
-
•
April 24, 1984
Page 8
•
• •
!fad CO be ofie Lite 1881!81!' haa ~~~ ltaow what kiad of C3tMl~SRIII8At wa3 '!'Bifllj Yp
en tA& p£epez cy . =-
Mr. Deacon gave argument for keeping the language as it. Mr. Deacon
stated the assignee would have comply with the current lease and comply with
zoning.
Mr. Olsen stated i-f fez WlJ •aaean King Soapers djd not .-aRe•e afte.-
12 yeara, Pradr c:arporzti.&R wottl~ haue the !5! rar to assign anyone ujthont Council's
say as to wbg 5"01'1 4 Qo there l&r 0 1 sec aske,Gi Ce~neil to CUliSidet if they Wdrtter
...cgntro] rnrer fi pdj nq a A8\l wee~ igr that sppt of whom yon wou 1 d Be ~l:l8t a p:roati
of as Kill! Saapara a~ wheal~ YOU W&ht tO fiSk Btady assig:uirtg: eemebe:i) \oitoft Alilm
yet~ do nut lw e She feeli111! ai 5rtae4! and SISiliaRly fiRi the bailt!tng sabdiwieied
!~!i,i!!i::J:• b!"::::J ::~::s ~= ~ :::7 ::2:::-:":n~!~~ w}. ~
as wou~di~k~it~to be in terms of th~ co~rt's decisions and in terms of how
long }'2 --.:" ... lll .. ~o enforce the zom.ng,~ they talte us to coatt.
i Mr. Olsen statea I th nk Mr. Deacon_..· cer ainly correct _j.Jl that it
affe alienabi~? because · they dete fn to a ign it to ~ebody that
assi has ~meet with yo approva~ gues eir co ~ is that Council
would un~aasonably be too s icky about who it wan ed e there. _.,
Mr. Olsen stated we were lking about ground lease and that other ~uld have the authority to ase to somebody else. The assignabilit ~
refers to after the term w ther Brady can simp~ wak up next Th~s ay
to assign to new entity and they can o what they want.
itted to drop out of the cture ~d you would
hom you are now dealing. ou wouldn't know if
st or not to do somethin comp t 1 ble with the
•
I • •
""
......
,....,
......
.....
....... ..
0
j ~
"' :.
:t
'i
< ~
-'
"'
fuu: i 1 :24, 1984
Page 4 ------------
Mr . Deacon stat ed continuation of the terms which is the initial ~ount, then the fair market value adJustments at 4X rate and then ever~ four years the CPI increases .
Mr .
to go through
City sa~s no
which to deci
purchase . Th
on referred to the lease statin_g t!!_era was • procedure
ow that is structured in terms of timing for, if the
c•n •t renew, the developer then has a period of time in wh~ther or not he wants to exercise the option of
not bound to buv it .
was a method to determin fair market
can not agree upon it . It talks about closing the
ng to be a purchase by the end of then of what was
then the current ter of the lease so that by the end of the current term
the developer wou d h ve bought it . The other situation which is • new
section in that ar a s if for so•• r•ason th• Citv again •l•ct•d not to
giv• its cons•nt an th• d•v•lop•r at the sam• ti•e did not want to
exercise his purchase tion then th•r• is a right of first refusal in
favor of th• developer r • P•riod of on• vear . If the City did not
ren•w Brady and d•cided to ase it to som•bodv else durin ~
following th• •nd of th• curr t•r• Bradv has t of
refusal to I•••• it on th •••• t•r that d
the Citv work•d out with t • third partv .
Mr . Deacon
of f'air mark•t
th• r•nt .
Mr . The
Mr . D•acon stat•d th•
in paragraph 10, the ind•mnity
favor of the landlord .
b• on page 9 which was
from th• tenant in
In paragraph 11 i diat•Iv following there is • •inor in the
second lin• wh•re th•r• i • carrot is simplv to correct an error in the
titl• of paragraph B whi is has b••n chang•d . Th• title of the
paragraph is only Fina •· In language in that same section that says
•ntity in which Mr . Brady is involved has been
which h• is general partner which he has
substantial owner ip in . ~lso is add•d which says in respect to
assign••• Brady inter•st, th• t•nant's interest, •• those •• to
which th• la lord 's cons•nt is r•quired is the, that assignee must
provide a re ason able •vidence to the landlord that the assignee has the
•
----
~ ------
----
-
"""\
,,
-1 '
:; I
----!'I
I•
t•fl
i"
" ' ,. .. ,
f
r.l '"
"' ... )
---·-c/
I
-------
~-,
~·· In'
_j'·l ..
f,i ..
1:
•• 1
J _: -.
''/ / ..
~:
~:, .,
. •• ~.,
-t
t: ••
'"
•
•
April t2 4 . 1984 "'"" -
P •g e 6
Mr Deacon stated ~~propos~ alter the languagefs~
the City ha ~the consent right \q r••peet with an assign•• who ~ -
~ an entity of which Bud Brady .,.1 -a-·e' por*n•r .-h~ i substantial
own•rship tnt•r••t . We ace t·1 h'na ·b·:o• •• ,.,,.1 tha J'lsiaiou so tstoats ••••
l*Dg"•g• t•1 k• about qlaiah 2Cii1Wht ihall R8* be ugr•••gp•h'U 'P'i*llhel• e-f!
dWi at•• i1 11111; to bw chaugwcP. 'lll• g••~e" aa•wd if Hf . Ols•n had an-.,
ob~•ction to leaving in the ~n~~t of ~~~dela~ing
s~ethiRI a~ c~a~•• to unr•asonable withholding .
,..,. DliWit ••a$ed *a not unreasonably dehy tile llecisTO'rr WliU11f b r
. 1)./vP-t tl
Mr . Deacon stated the language would read~ l ;t"~fourth
lin• Jown ahicto scvw w; t•••~ ••••aRt el laft•lutdr •hirh eaftii"C ah•l~
ftl ••• bill WWIOIIG'l• Gild dWlWtW tfiU Ubi di WltilliWid 01 Wild i' would i aad '
"Tenant shall not assign Cexc ept pursuant to paragraph 8 (financing) )
all of its rights as tenant under this ground lease without the prior
written consent of the landlor d . which consent shall not be unreasonably delayed~ and the rest of it would be as it is written .
Mr . Olsen *-d~ •• ~./Jh-:L..g~ng •*"' ,,.. eouudl
•ho"':rf tlla Buu;;cll &pp;uua tb'• 1•·ae ~would h•v• in ••••nc• bl•nket
authority to appro ve an assignee . ~
Mr . Deacon stated that was correct .
COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED THAT THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD APPROVE
THE GROUND LEASE MADE WITH S . BUD BRADY . Council Member Bradshaw
seconded the Illation .
COUNCIL I'IE"BER HIQDAY MOVED TO AMEND ON PAQE 3 SECTION H. LINE
10, BY ADDINQ "OFFER" BETWEEN "LEASE" AND "FOR" IN THAT SENTENCE; AND ON
PAGE 2, SECTION F . CHANGE 1~ DAYS TO 30 DAYS; ON PAGE 9 SECTION 11, FIFTH
LINE DOWN STRIKE "WITHHELD OR". Counc i 1 Member Bradshaw second•d the
Illation . Upon a call o' the roll. the vote on the •mendment resulted as
follows ·
Ayes : Council Members Higday. Neal . VobeJda , Wei s t.
Bilo. Bradshaw. Otis .
N•ys : None . ~ ----... ~
The Mayor declared th•A~ntion carried .
------
•
-~---
--
-----
----~ ----·-
--
!:~1 li
~ii
.. ; -.. :I
"
·1 --j
_i li
1
(
Ap rtl 2 4 , 1984
Pag• 7
Upon a call of the roll, the vote on the original motion
a• follow•:
All••:
Na!Js :
Council Member• Higd•!J• Neal. VobeJda,
Silo , Bradshaw, Otis .
Council Memb•r W•ist .
The Ma!Jor declar•d th• motion carri•d .
* * * * * * *
COUNCIL MEMBER HIQDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN .
Mavor Otis adJourned the meeting without a vote at 7 :10p .m.
Deputv Citv Clerk
------------------
•
-----------------------
---------
J
1:) ..
,. ,:
----
---~:
" -·--------l . ..
' ------------. ---1
i" :11
-----------~ --·--·--_J:
--
---
---
-
·-~-
------
. ---------------
----
"
r.:
f:
-----------f'
I'' ·"' ~ -·--]
;"'
'
' .
'
1
'
'
" l
' ..
' .
' ~. ---J ~
J
-•
• -
AGENDA ITEM __ _ PRESENTED BY -----
~c;~~
~~~~
O.fLLo-
fl;recu.o~
/111c_~
~r
6~ o~
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
Hlgday
Neal
Vobe,da
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
M<YriON:
• •
I .
• -
• •
AGENDA ITEM-----PRESENTED BY --------
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Abstain
Hlgday ,_.
Neal //'
Vobe1da ,........
Weist v
Bllo t,...--"
Bradshaw I/"
Otis v
MOTION :
I • •
• •
• -
• •
AGENDA ITEM I/-.--.
)
PRESENTED BY&~
Hoved Seconded Ayes ~Y Absent Abstal n
lHqCSay
Neal
vobe1da
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION: • I . •
• •
•
•
r· •
----~--~-~~~-
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes N Ab ay sent Abstain
Hlgday
Neal
Vo be1da
Wei s t
Bi Ia
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
I . •
• -
• •
AGENDA ITEM ------------PRESENTED BY ----
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Kly Absent Abstain
Hlqelav
Neal
Vobe1da
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
I . .
.~------------------------~------•
•
• •
AGENDA I TEM ______ ______ PRESENTED BY ----
Moved Seconded
HT<iGav
Neal
Vobe1da
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
I . •
•
• -
• •
AG ENDA ITEM --PRESENTED BY ----
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes May Absent Abstain
IITQcSay
Neal
vobe,da
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
• I .
•
•
• •
•
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded
Ayes ~y Absent Abstain
MOTION:
I .
• •
• -
• •
AGENDA ITEM ---
PRESENTED BY ----
ROLL CALL
l'loved Seconded Ayes Kly Absent Abstain
-mQ"day
Neal
Vobe1da
Welst
8if0
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
I . •
• •
• -
• •
AGENDA ITEM ----------PRESENTED BY ----------------
ROLL CALL
Hoved Seconded Abstain
Hlgday ...
Neal ...
Vobe:1da v
Weist ,...
Rllo v
Bradshaw v
Otis ..
MOI'ION:
• I .
• •
• -
• •
AGENDA ITEM ---PRESENTED BY ----
0
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
Hlgday
Neal
Vobeida
Weist
Bllo
Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
I . • •
• •
• -
• •
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY -------------
0
ROLL CALL
Hoved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
y-Hlgday
Neal
Vobe,da
Weist
Bi lo v Bradshaw
Otis
MOTION:
I • • •
•
•
• •
AGEN DA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY -------
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Ab t I s a n ,.., HTqday
Neal
Vobe]da
Weist
IIi lo ,__ Bradshaw
Otis
I . •
• •
• -
• •
AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED B Y -------
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ay es y Absent Abstain
Hlgda'(
Neal I
Vobe1da I
Wei s t 1--Bi lo 1
Bradshaw I
Otis
MOTION:
I • •
• •