The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-06-18 (Regular) Meeting Agenda• • • • City Council Meeting -Regular June 18, 1984 0 J - • • • • • ~~,9~ ~~~y~c2:;' ~ #lt.~A~~-;;¥ • 0 0 • I . - 1£ P R 0 C L A N A T I 0 N WH EREA S, the flag of the United States of America is a visible symbol of our history for virtually all U. S. citizens living today; and WHEREAS, for citizens of other countries, particularly those behind the iron curtain, the Stars and Stripes kindle hopes of liberty and independence; and KHEREAS, to com memorate the anniversar y of its adoption on June 14, 1 977 , Congress ha s set aside th e t~enty -one da ys fro m Flag Day t hrough Independence Day a s a period to honor America; and WH EREAS , by displaying the national colors during thi s twenty-one -day salute to America, ~e symbolize a united de moc racy, a country that stands alone as a pillar of fre e- dom and a gateway to opportunit y; NOW, THEREFORE, 1, EUGENE L. OTIS, Mayo r of the City of Englewood , Colorado, h ereby proclaim th e twent y-one days, June 14 through July 4, a s a p eri od to honor America and th at th e r e be public gatherings and activiti es at ~hich th e p e o ple can celebrate and hon or th ei r country in an appropriate manner. GIVEN under my hand and seal thi s 18th da y of June, 19 84. Eugen? L. Otis, Mayor I • • • • AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL JUNE 18, 1984 f ~ •'"'~-" (}{;:-" / r (j 7:30 P.M. Call to o{der, invocation by Reverend Robert Thompson Hampden Hills Baptist Church, East Dartmouth and / J., South University Blvd., pledge of allegiance by _j' Boy Scout Troop 1115 acd 1154, and roll call. 4 ,~.t ..).lt...-1-«---';(Yil.U .... J 'Cllt...l • u 'f"4 Minutes. f lt l"-'-'--" , ' ~t.-Cuv--- l 3. 4. 5. (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of June 4, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Minutes of the special meeting of June 11, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) ~re-Scheduled Visitors. (Please limit your pre- sentation to 10 minutes.) (a) Mr. Richard Dutro of the Englewood Jaycees will be present to give a progress report con- cerning the 4th of July fireworks display. (b) Officer John Wing, President of the Englewood Police Benefit Association, will be present to discuss the Board of Career Service Com- missioners. Other Visitors. (Please limit your presentation to 5 minutes.) Public Hearing. Communications -No Action Recommended. (a) Minutes of the Englewood Housing Authority meetings of the February 29 annual meeting, the regular meeting of February 29, the regular meeting of March 28, and the regular meeting of April 25, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) • I • • - • • • • • Page 2 June 18, 1984 Agenda 5. Communications -No Action Recommended. (b) Minutes of the Urban Renewal Authority meetings of April 25, Hay 2, and Hay 16, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (c) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of May 22, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) 6. Communications -Action Recommended. 7. Council Communication from the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning an amendment to the Dartmouth Industrial Park Development. (Copies enclosed.) City Attorney. Ordinances on Final Reading. CJ3 -JI ;q J.. (a) Ordinance providing for the increase of the hotel/motel room tax by amending Title XIII, Chapter 4, Section 3(b), of the Englewood Municipal Code, 1969 as amended. (Copies enclosed.) (Ou{ If d. 1 (b) Ordinance approving transit street improve- ment agreement with the Regional Transportation District. (Copies enclosed.) C/;J .u ~ ~ :;- {!!L J.-Resolutions. (c) Resolution appointing David J. Menzies as Assistant City Attorney. (Copies enclosed.) (d) Resolution appointing Beverly J. Brizee as Paralegal to the City Attorney. (Copies enclosed.) Proclamation. (e) Pfoclamation approv ~ent agreement wit tion District. (C Other Hatters. (f) Attorney's Choice • ng transit st~ove the Regional Transporta- ies enclosed.) :f_U U"C I • - ( • • • Page 3 June 18, 1984 Agenda B. City Manager. (a) (b) (c) Council Communication from the Director of Engineering Services concerning the 1984 Con- crete Program -30 day notices. (Copies enclosed.) Setting a public hearing on July 16, 1984 at 7:30 p.m. for citizen's input concerning the 1985 Pre-Budget Hearing and the General Revenue Sharing Funds. Manager's Choice. 9. General Discussion. (a) Mayor's Choice. (b) Council Member's Choice. Council Communication concerning the appointments to the Englewood Downtown Development Authority. (Copies enclosed.) Resolution establishing an annual salary for the City Manager for the remainder of the calendar year 1984. (Copies enclosed.) 10. Adjournment. a !l /J,g o; t j ()MI' 11 (1, #tt'$~ l) MC COWN Ci Manager AM/sb I . - • • • • • AGENDA ITEM ---PRESENTED BY ----- ll (J__f_} 6 (Jl dJ_1--1 (J__-t_t_,~ ~,~~ It! h /lfA ci Jlvflon'"- i/-t ~ 13 n-,r · -~ 0..tv:f:., Ji I I S o !!J V 7!Jt_ J IJ f'-0 L,l ~ \ [/-~ . . Jhc 2tl L It_ ROLL CALL Moved Seconded .I! lg<lay Neal Vobe1da Weist Bllo Bradsh- Otis MOTION: • • I . • • • • AGENDA ITEM -----PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain _H!gday ~ Nea_!_ _V Vob~da ,_.. Weist ...... Bllo .Y Bradshaw __1:.---Otis v MOTION: I • • • • • • - AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlgday v Neal Vobe1da Weist t--v Bllo Bradshaw Otis - MOTION: ( •· t I( I • • • • • • • l b AGENDA ITEM -----PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain nlgday -Nea_!_ J • VobE!_l_da j_ v We_!_st 1 ~ _B_IIo 1 Bradshaw -Otis I • • MOTION:{ --·. p-y'_t? ,_ u· v . • • • • ,. - AGENDA ITEM ~ PRESENTED BY ----- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain liTqday v Neal -t -Vobe1da - We s t -R l lo Bradshaw Ot i s I . • • • - AGENDA ITEM ::¥'h Moved Seconded "lgCiay Neal Vobe1da Weist • Bllo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: • • / '--- ROLL CALL • • • PRESENTED BY -------- Ayes N.y Absent Abstain • I • • • - • • 3 AGENDA ITEM ----- PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain HTgdav Neal Vobe1da Weist • Bi fo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: • I . • • • - • • ...--- \ C'- AGE NDA ITE~ PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain HlgCiay Neal Vobeida ~ Weist • ...--Bllo Bradshaw ~ Otis - MCYI'ION: ~ S c-- I • • • • • • - • • AGENDA ITEM 6 A -. PRESENTED BY Q,.....::..::....h~..::::~:.__--- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain 111gaay v Neal Vobe1da Weist v-Bllo Bradshaw Otis • I • • • • • - AGENDA ITEM ----PRESENTED BY ------ I ~4--12c: ~( ;-l~ut 4 d 0 ~. 8 C{ /f2 {<) !l#!u-L j {)1 f1JA)_;£J -d-£· /> ~' ~ r/0' ti'= 0 CC Qt c,~L--L-t)>-~-~ u--1-..__L f' ,mLU!-'T t..L / (fk '-/).JLfl"LJ<"--( J J or3 C/--,s-& 1 f ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlgdav -Neal I Vobeida I Weist I Bllo Bradsh--Otis - MOTION: • I . . • - • • .-/7 c--- AGENDA ITEM_L-~-------PRESENTED BY -------------- ROLL CALL Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hoved Seconded "ladav - Neal 1 vobe,da I v Weist I Bllo 1 ---.J...- Bradshaw • Otis --- MOTION: • I • • r ) t • • • • PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlqelay Neal I Vobe1da I y Weist v Bilo I Bradshaw -Otis - MOTION: I • • • • • - AGEN DA I TEM ~ ~ PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Hoved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain liTgday ~ Neal I y Vo be]da I • Wei s t I J.--Bllo I Bradshaw - Otis MOTION: • I • • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM J d · PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlgaay --v Neal r J...--Vo be1da I Weist I Bllo J Bradshaw --Otis - MariON: I • • • • • - • • AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Hoved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain 111gaay £,. Neal I t/' Vobe1da I • Weist I Bllo Bradshaw -Otis MOTION:(( .. / I • • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM I~' / PRESENTED BY 7 a '2-f Q _ / fs_, lA. Lict-( o_f.Hu)-. Clu~ IJ)--L, Lu , _,__% ( Lc____ '1 ch(_ hi (ru. __ ) t )<___/, 1-<.)---1 r - { fl "t --0<-fJJ-'-t k> ,..__, C{/'IJ; cl 1k ,__,_1 Jl._j tL I '-/!"( '-h ,L__ --/1 Q__ ~jJ __ ' f\'----0---------g ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes N•y Absent Abstain tfiQdav --Neal ----Vobe1da v Weist ,_ Bllo Bradsh- Otis MOTI I . • • • - • • P><ESENTED );...:..-..::_C._L_' !...:..2...:...t _lt_:__. _ ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Abstain Hlgday - v NeaT I Vobeida I Weist I v-Biio I Bradshaw - Otis - MCYI'ION: • I • • • - • • • • • AGENDA ITEM ~ PRESENTED BY _ __.Lo..c..·~{?f._=-.... ~=·-~<-'- Hoved 1/ RO LL CALL Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain liTCiOaY Neal 7 Vobeida I Weist I V" Bllo I Bradshaw Otis -- (}'1 /:J~ /!Lt> J-Jl-('? / ~-4~ rJ -/rJ '7l..UG Cf/d< t U.f ti ~{ lrf( ,52z ,..L cTJV7Uol vr~- ~ D (2 LC~-- • I . • • • - AGENDA ITEM ~· PRESENTED BY ------- ROLL CALL !'loved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain RT<iCfay - t--Neal - Vobe1da -• Weist -t..--Bllo Bradshaw - Otis - MOTION: ;! fl ~t • ~ I • • ){: tt ( ( ({.1 fl! lJ (::;t ! , tJ ';t ( ( }t. . { ~ • • AGENDA ITEM ___ _ }nc.[u l ~ '-~Q , (3 .i r • • • PRESENTED BY ------- a /Q?r'L '----_j y , !3 p\. ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlodav NeaT Vo be-lda Weist Bllo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: • • I . . - ' • • • REGULAR MEETING: • • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS City of Englewood, Colorado June 4, 1984 The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, met in regular session on June 4, 1984, at 7:40 p.m. Mayor Otis, presiding, called the meeting to order. The invocation was given by Council Member Higday. The pledge of allegiance was led by Boy Scout Troop 1154. Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Absent: Council H.ember Weist. Mayor Otis declared a quorum present. * * * * * * * Also present were: City Manager McCown * * * Assistant City Manager Vargas City Attorney Olsen Director of Community Development Powers Deputy City Clerk Owen * * * * Mayor Otis and Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw presented awards to Englewood High School athletes and coaches in recognition of their participation in the 1983-1984 state tournaments. Hr. Nesbitt, Athletic Director for Englewood High School, thanked Council for the recognition • * * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 23, 1984. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis • • I • • - • , • • • ' June 4, 1984 Page 2 • Nays: None. Absent: Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 24, 1984. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 30, 1984. Council Member Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 7, 1984. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Council Member Vobejda noted a correction on page 3, fourth paragraph to insert "was" between "he" and "a" in the second line. Council Members Bradshaw and Neal accepted the editoral comments. Ayes: Council Members Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, • I • - • • • June 4, 1984 Page 3 Nays: Abstain: Absent: • • • Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Higday. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. • • • • • • • COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF HAY 14, 1984. Council Member Vobejda seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. • • • • • • • COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF HAY 21, 1984. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Council Member Vobejda noted a correction on page 3, last paragraph, his statement was he "noted a tremendous amount of fencing"; "that there was a limitation of 50 fee by 50 feet". Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw • None. Mayor Otis. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried • • • • • • • • • •• • • - ' , • • June 4, 1984 Page 4 • • • There were no other visitors at this time • • • • • • • • COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS OF PAVING DISTRICT NO. 29; APPROVING THE APPRORTIONMENTS; AND PRESCRIBING THE MANNER FOR COLLECTION AND PAYMENT. Council Member Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Mayor Otis stated the purpose was to consider the ordinance and to receive public comment. Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak. No one responded. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO CLOSE TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. Council Member Higday seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 19 SERIES OF 1984 BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 16 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE WHOLE COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE WITHIN PAVING DISTRICT NO. 29, IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO; APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE APPORTIONMENT OF SAID COST TO EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN SAID DISTRICT; ASSESSING A SHARE OF SAID COST AGAINST EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND; PRESCRIBING THE MANNER FOR THE COLLECTION AND PAYMENT OF SAID ASSESSMENTS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY . • I • ( • June 4, 1984 Page 5 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 16, SERIES OF 1984, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Vobejda seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. • • • • • • • "Communications -No Action Recommended" on the agenda were: (a) (b) (c) (d) Minutes of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals meet- ing of April 11, 1984. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of May 8, 1984. Minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of May 8, 1984. Minutes of the Downtown Development Authority meet- ing of May 16, 1984. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO ACCEPT "COMMUNICATIONS -NO ACTION RECOMMENDED" AGENDA ITEMS 5(A) -5(D). Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried • • • • • • • • City Manager McCown presented a letter from the Executive Director of the Englewood Downtown Development Authority to Mayor Otis concerning appointments to the Board. • I • • - t • ' • June 4, 1984 Page 6 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED THAT STAFF MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR INTERVIEWS WITH THE PEOPLE MENTIONED IN THE LETTER AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES PARTICULARLY THOSE THAT HAVE ALREADY SUBMITTED A LETTER OF INTEREST IN THIS POSITION. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Council desired that interviews be set for the next study session on June 11, 1984. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL TO APPOINT DAN GREEN FOR THE BALANCE OF CLET GASSON'S TERM WHICH EXPIRES JULY 1, 1986. Council Member Higday seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried • ORDINANCE NO. 20 SERIES OF 1984 • • • • BY AUTHORITY • • • COUNCIL BILL NO. 17 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BILO AN ORDINANCE VACATING STREET RIGHT OF WAY AND A SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT AND ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT FOR A NEW WATER LINE IN THE VICINITY OF SOUTH SHERMAN STREET, U.S. 285, AND SOUTH LOGAN STREET. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 17, SERIES OF 1984, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Bradshaw seconded the motion • Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Counc i l Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, • I • • June 4, 1984 ( Page 7 Nays: Absent: • • • Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1984 * * * * * * BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR * COUNCIL BILL NO. 19.2 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE INCREASE OF THE HOTEL/MOTEL ROOM TAX BY AMENDING TITLE XIII, CHAPTER 4, SECTIONS 2 AND 3, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE '69, AS AMENDED. 1 COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 19.2, SERIES OF 1984, ON FIRST READING. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: I • Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1984 * * * * BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR * * * COUNCIL BILL NO. 20 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BILO AN ORDINANCE APPROVING TRANS I T STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT WITH REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT. • I • • - • • • • June 4, 1984 I'' Page 8 • COUNCIL MEMBER SILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 20, SERIES OF 1984, ON FIRST READING. Council Member Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Silo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * • * * City Attorney Olsen requested authority from Council to defend two lawsuits --one involving Physical Whimsical and the second involving Eugene Issen. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO DEFEND THE CITY IN THE TWO LAWSUITS. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Silo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. • • • • * * • City Manager McCown presented a Council Communication concerning an award of contract for installation of burglary/security system at the Englewood Recreation Center. Mr. McCown recommended awarding the low bid to Wells Fargo Alarm System in the amount of $10,388.00. Mr. McCown stated the budget for the security system was original set at $15,000.00. Mr. McCown noted the community center was about one-third completed and plans were to open the center in January of 1985. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR INSTALLATION OF BURGLARY/SECURITY SYSTEM AT THE ENGLEWOOD RECREATION CENTER TO WELLS FARGO ALARM SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,388.00. • I • • - • • June 4, 1984 Page 9 • • • Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 21 SERIES OF 1984 * * * * * * * A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO AUTHORIZING, APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO TO ENTER INTO A CERTAIN COOPERATION AGREEMENT WITH FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ENGLEWOOD; RATIFYING CERTAIN ACTIONS HERETOFORE TAKEN; AND REPEALING ANY ACTION HERETOFORE TAKEN IN CONFLICT HEREWITH. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 21, SERIES OF 1984. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Director Powers at the request of Council Member Neal explained why the City was engaging a trustee. Director Powers stated the purpose the resolution was to commit the sales tax collected above the base in the tax increment district (downtown area only, not Cinderella City) to pay off bonds. The trustee would hold, monitor, and distribute funds for the City in the downtown redevelopment project. Council Member Higday asked if there was anyone in the audience who came to the meeting specifically to ask questions on this subject. No one came forward. Council Member Higday stated the bond proceeds would finance the private portion of the downtown redevelopment project; and would not interfer with the citizens' property taxes except to make sure the taxes do not increase. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis • None. • I • • - • • June 4, 1984 Page 10 Absent: • • • Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * Richard Dutro, Englewood Jaycees, came forward. Mr. Dutro stated the Jaycees were planning to celebrate the 4th of July with fireworks again this year. Mr. Dutro stated he would provide further information at the next City Council meeting and alerted Council that the Jaycees may be asking permission to charge admission again this year. * * * * * * * There was no further business discussed. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN. Mayor Otis adjourned the meeting without a vote at 8:20 p.m • • I • - • SPECIAL MEETING: • • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS City of Englewood, Colorado June 11, 1984 \b The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, met in special session on June 11, 1984, at 5:00 p.m. Mayor Otis, presiding, called the meeting to order. The invocation was given by Mayor Otis. The pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Otis. Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Absent: Council M~mber Weist. (arrived at 5:10p.m.) The Mayor declared a quorum present. • • • • • • • Also present were: Acting City Manager Vargas City Attorney Olsen Director of Community Development Deputy City Clerk Owen • • • • • • • BY AUTHORITY Powers ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1984 COUNCIL BILL NO. 22 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE RATIFYING ADOPTION OF THE ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; RATIFYING CERTAIN FINDINGS PREVIOUSLY MADE AND ACTIONS HERETOFORE TAKEN; APPROVING IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN IN ALL PERTINENT PARTS, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 22, SERIES OF 1984, ON FIRST READING, AND TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:00 P.M. ON JUNE 28, 1984. Council Member Higday seconded the motion. • I • - - • • • June 11, 1984 ~ Page 2 • Council Member Weist arrived at 5:10 p.m. and reviewed the council bill under consideration. status. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Weist, Bradshaw, Otis. Nays: None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. No further business was discussed due to special meeting COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN. Mayor Otis adjourned the meeting without a vote at 5:15 p.m • . ({)~ • I • - • • ' • • • • MINUTES OF ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY Regular Meeting February 29, 1984 The Regular Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority was called to order at 5:15 p.m. on February 29, 1984, by Chairman Tom Burns at Simon Center, 3333 South Lincoln, Englewood, Colorado, 80110. ROLL CALL Mer.~bers Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Thomas J. Burns, Chairman Valerie Lash, Member Cindy Peterson, Member Betty Beier, Vice Chairman Beverly Bradshaw, Member Frances Buck Jonas, Executive Director -EHA Linda A. Knopinski, Housing Administrator Maudie Wilson, Orchard Place Tenant Council Theresa Girtin, Acting Recording Secretary Reading and Approval of Minutes Minutes of the February 1, 1984, Regular Meeting are to be submitted at another meeting. Sta~us Reports: The Duplexes, Orchard Place, and Maintenance Super- visor Status Reports for January were accepted by the Board with the following comments: Duplexes and Orchard Place are leased up . Executive Director informed the Board that the Staff is now upgrading the monthly status reports to better inform the Board of what is occurring in each program. Ms. Jonas felt it important that the Board know how many applications we are now taking and names for the Waiting List as well, to be better informed of the size of the list and also be aware of when to re-open the list. This could occur sometime at the end of the year. Some sug- gestions as to what the monthly status reports could include were equal opportunity kind of figures showing age, sex, race, etc., in order to better monitor the kind of people seeking assistance . If tnere was anything the Board wanted on the status reports that was not presently being included, the Board can request information be added to these reports. Questions arose from the Maintenance Report as to what kind of re- furbishing was being done. The units now being worked on have never been painted, drapery cleaned, carpets shampooed, etc., and this type of maintenance was now being taken care of in order to put the Five- Year Plan into effect. • I • • - • • • • • -2-Minutes, EHA, 2/29/84 revised « The Executive Director explained that as a follow up to the work session held on February 13, 1984, to review the 1983 and 1984 Op- erating Budgets and 1982 Financial Statements, the Board needed to pass Resolutions approving the Operating Eudgets. I • Resolution No. 4 for Approval of Public Housing Project No. C048-2 Operating Budget for fiscal year ending December 31, 1983, was sub- mitted to the Board. M/S PETERSON/LASH TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 4 SERIES OF 1984 APPROVING PUBLIC HOUSING PROJECT NO. C048-2 OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1983, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: ASSENT: BURNS, LASH, PETERSON NONE BEIER, BRADSHAW M/S PETERSO~/LASH TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 5 SERIES OF 1~84 APPROVING PUBLIC HOUSING PROJECT NO. C048-2 OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1984, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, LASH, PETERSON NONE BEIER, BRADSHAW Performance Fundin' System -Questions were discussed as to why we have to do the wor sheets for Performance Funding if it did not effect our budget. Executive Director replied that we do these worksheets as a matter of routine. We do not get Performance Funding, but there has to be something of record with HUD to determine if we are eligible. The advantages and disadvantages of being eligible for Performance Funding were stated by the Executive Director. It was stated that this type of funding gives HUD more control over the Housing Authority due to the agreements the PHA has to sign in order to receive it. The Executive Director discussed the Brooke Amendment, which sets rents as a percentage of income, and higher utility costs since the early 1970's, which have forced many Housing Authorities to deperid on operating subsidies . SIMON CENTER Status Report for Simon Center was noted and accepted by the Board. Floyd Avenue Realignment -The drawings for the Simon Center Parking Lot design are not ready according to a memo from Susan Powers, Director of Community Development; and for this reason, this item will be scheduled for the March Board Meeting. • I • • • • • • -3-Minutes, EHA, 2/29/84, revised Resolution No. 6 for Approval of_Simon Center Operating Budget for Fiscal Year ending December 31, 1983, was submitted to the Board. MIS LASH/PETERSON TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 6 SERIES OF 1984 APPROVING SIMON CENTER OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1983, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, LASH, PETERSON NONE BEIER, BRADSHAW R: s o 1 u t i on No . 7 f Q r A p p r o v a l o f S i m on C en t e !_Q_p_ e r a t i .!!.~~ f o r F1scal Year ending December 3T, 1984, was submitted to the Board. M/S LASH/PETERSON TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 7 SERIES OF 1984 APPROVING SIMON CENTER OPERATING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1984 MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, LASH, PETERSON NONE BEIER, BRADSHAW Discussion on the procedure for taking names for the Section 8 waiting list followed with comments on how many are now signed up and what types of persons are seeking assistance through Englewood Housing. We are getting people outside of the City of Englewood calling to be put on our list, but still give Englewood residents priority. Letter from Ed Carrera, HUD Branch Chief-Letter from Ed Carrera, HUD Housing Management Branch Chief was brought to the attention of the Board by the Executive Director who explained that the Englewood Housing Authority was granted a 60-day extension to get the year-end financial statements for Project C0048002 and C099-E048-001 through 007 turned in to HUD. The Executive Director also explained the letter to HUD Financial Analyst Sheryl Miller in response to a request from Ms. Miller for copies of the 1979 financial statements on Projects C099-E048-001 through 004, after Ms. Miller discovered that the Englewood Housing Author~ty's reserve account had been adjusted by HUD accountants due to not receiving the 1979 statements. The Executive Director explained that Ms. Miller sent copies of the reports which were originally submitted on ~ovember 9, 1979, and expressed concern that the adjustments had been made with no notice or explanation to the Englewood Housing Authority. • I • • - • • • • • -4-Minutes, EHA, 2/29/84, revised REHABILITATION PROGRAM A memo from Assistant Director for Planning, Dorothy Romans, was discussed. Mrs. Romans recommended that the Englewood Housing Authority should apply to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals for variances for the triplex at 3034 South Galapago in order to sell the units as single family attached. It was the sense of the Board that Staff should apply for variances and that Chairman, Tom Burns, and Attorney, Bob Mach, would make the presentation to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. Sanford Companies Offer to Donate House -Mr. Sanford Metzel has donated a house located at 358 West Belleview Avenue, Englewood, to the City of Englewood Housing Authority. Mr. Metzel had left the letter, a key to the house, and the Bill of Sale on Executive Director's desk sometime in February. Executive Director is now having this house checked by the housing moving contractor before any decision can be made on accepting the donation. One possibility is to store the house if the mover feels it will be cost effective. After reports are made to Executive Director, she will inform the Board of the results. Pass Through Loan Policy -A staff recommendation to establish new eligibility criteria for pass through loans was discussed in detail. The Board requested that Staff do outreach to attempt to get currently eligible households to apply for pass through loans. If there is little response, the Board would like staff to discuss the situation with local bankers and realtors to determine the need for such a program for the moderate-income households with incomes up to 120 % of median as recommended by staff. Staff had suggested that moderate income households may be having difficulty qualifying for 18-20 % re- habilitation loans from local lending institutions due to the high cost of mortgage and housing related payments. The Executive Director reported that on May 9, 10, and 11, the State CDBG Advisory Board will hold hearings to determine which CD grant applications will be funded. The City's applicat ion for $350,000 for the Housing Rehabilitation program will be considered at that time. Since most of the 1982 CDBG funds for Rehab have been committed, the Director stated that it is crucial to the program to be funded this year. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE Letter from James McCabe of Robert Sylvester, CPA -Acknowledged. Mr. McCabe explained that he had resigned from the firm of Robert J. Sylvester, Certified Public Accountant, and would no longer be handl- ing the Englewood Housing Authority's accounting work for that firm. Administrative Review of Accounting Controls Proeosal -Lehman, Butterwick & Company is preparing an administrat1ve review of account- ing controls in effect for the Englewood Housing Authority per the proposa 1 • • I • • • • • • -5-Minutes, EHA, 2/29/84, revised Invitation for A lications for Director exp ained that this is elderly housing, and it is only Housing Authorit~es cannot make application for this unless they set themselves up as a separate non-profit body. At this time, we do not have the time to look into this in greater detail, but have requested information be sent to us on this Program. This is a very competitive program so we would have to demonstrate the need in order to qualify. After knowing the needs of our community, we would better determine if this was an alternative for us to look into. Housing Division Section of City Annual Report -Acknowledged. EHA Classification and Compensation Plan -Linda Knopinski has now been officially classified as a Supervisor with the City. Although she supervised people before she was not officially recognized as a supervisor. Accountant/Fee Accountant Cost Comparison -The Board will read over material presented to them and discuss at the next Board meeting. 1984 Staff Goals -The Executive Director suggested a retreat for the Englewood Housing Authority Board in order to set goals for the future of the Englewood Housing Authority. Executive Director Evaluation -The Board will meet on March 14, 1984, to do the six-month evaluatfOn of the Executive Director. COMMISSIONER'S CHOICE Maudie Wilson, Tenant Council/Orchard Place, was given this time to speak. She thanked the Board for the $300 Tenant Services donation, and explained that it was being used to purchase certain kitchen equipment. She also asked for clarification of the duties of the Resident Managers. PUBLICATIONS The publications were general information items and wer noted and accepted by the Board. M/S PETERSON/LASH THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS : AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, LASH, PETERSON NONE BEIER, BRADSHAW Meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Recording Secretary • I • • - • • • • • The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, held February 29, 1984, stand approved as submitted. Dated this 25th Day of April, 1984 . -~ · -'"-~L·f:?~~dr--M GX-~ces tu'fic. Jon Executive Directo • I • • • • • • ANNUAL f~EETING ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY February 29, 1984 .4 . The Annual Meet ing of the Englewood Housing Authority was called to order by Chairman Thomas J. Burns at 5:00p.m. on February 29, 1984, at the Simon Center, 3333 South lincoln, Englewood, Colorado, 80110. Members Present: Tom Burns, Chairman Valerie lash, Member Cindy Peterson, Member Members Absent: Betty Beier, Vice Chairman Beverly Bradshaw, Member Also Present: Frances Buck Jonas, Executive Director linda Knopinski, Housing Administrator Maudie Wilson, Orchard Place Tenant Council Theresa Girtin, Acting Recording Secretary. The first order of business was the election of Officers of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners. The nominations were opened for Chairman of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners. Thomas J. Burns was nominated for Chairman by Cindy Peterson. The nominations were opened for Vice-Chairman of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners. Ms. Betty Beier was nominated for Vice Chairman by Valerie lash. MOTION IT WAS MOVED BY CINDY PETERSON AND SECONDED BY VALERIE LASH THAT THE NOMINATIONS FOR CHAIRMAN AND VICE-CHAIRMAN OF THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BE CLOSED. AYES: NAYS : ABSENT : BURNS, LASH, PETERSON NONE BEIER, BRADSHAW A voice vote was taken for Chairman of the Engle wood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners. All those in favor of Thomas J. Burns for Chairman were asked to indicate so. AYES: NAYS: ABSTAINED : ABSENT : LASH, PETERSON NONE BURNS BEIER, BRADSHAW A voice vote was taken for Vice-Chairman of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners. All those in favor of Betty Beier for Vice-Chairman were asked to indicate so. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, LASH, PETERSON NONE BEIER, BRADSHAW I • - - • • • Page 2 • • • Annual Meeting, EHA, 2/2 9/8 4 Minutes Chairman Burns asked for a motion to reappoint Fran c es Buc k J on as as the Executive Director of the Englewood Housing Authority. MOTION IT WAS MOVED BY CINDY PETERSON AND SECONDED BY VALERIE LASH TH AT FRANCES BUCK JONAS BE REAPPOINTED EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY. AYES: NAYS : ABSENT: BURNS, LASH, PETERSON NONE BEIER, BRADSHAW The Annual Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority Boa rd o f Commi s s i oners was ad j ourned at 5:15p.m., February 29, 1984 . • I . n - - • • • • • The Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, held February 29, 1984, stand approved as submitted. ~A .. ~•:L~~-~~-(7'--P-fr:~ces Buck J as Executive Dire or Dated this 25th Day of April, 1984 . • I . - • • • • • MINUTES OF ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY Regular Meeting March 28, 1984 A I. CALL TO ORDER . The Regular meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority was called to order by Chairman Thomas J. Burns at 5:00 p.m. at the Simon Center, 3333 South lincoln, Englewood, Colorado. New Recording Secretary, Mary Ryan,was introduced to the Board. Members present: Members absent: Others present: Thomas J. Burns, Chairman Betty Beier, Vice-Chairman Beverly Bradshaw (joined meeting at 6 :15 p.m.) Valerie lash Cindy Peterson Susan Powers, Director of Community Development Frances Buck Jonas, Executive Director, EHA Christy Wall, Public Housing Manager Mary A. Ryan, Acting Recording Secretary II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. February 29, 1984 Chairman Burns stated that from the comments made by the Board, the Minutes should be considered again because of the fairly extensive changes to them. Chairman Burns said that if no other additions or corrections were suggested, perhaps the Board could move that the suggested amendments to the Minutes be inserted and the Minutes could be reviewed at the next meeting. MOTION VICE-CHAIRMAN BEIER MOVED AND VALERIE LASH SECONDED THE MOTION TO INSERT THE SUGGESTED CORRECTIONS INTO THE MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 29, 1984, AND THOSE MINUTES BE REVIEWED AT THE MEETING HELD APRIL 25, 1984. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, BEIER, LASH NONE BRADSHAW, PETERSON Ms. Beier brought up that there were so many minutes in the offing, the minutes should reflect that minutes from previous meetings should be submitted at another date. Chairman Burns suggested the Agenda note which minutes were still not done to serve as a reminder to the Board . III. PUBLIC HOUSING Duplexes Chairman Burns referenced the Duplex Status Report and presumed from the reference to the increased rent due to a resident's change in employment, that it was a positive change. Public Housing Manager, • I • • - • • • • • -2-EHA Minutes, 3/28/84 Christy Wall replied in the affirmative. Chairman Burns then asked if there was anything else to report on the Duplexes other than the information about the frozen water lines. Ms. Wall replied that there was not. In reply to a question from Chairman Burns, Frances Buck Jonas, Executive Director, EHA, explained that the developer had resolved the pipe insulation deficiency and that there had been no burst pipes and no damage to tenants' property. Orchard Place Ch a irman Burns introduced Item B-3 on the Agenda, Status Report for Orchard Place. There were no comments or discussions on this item. Item B-4, the Naintenance Status Report for Orchard was then intro- duced by Chairman Burns . There were no comments or discussions on this item. Item B-5, the Recommended Addendum to EHA Collection Policy, a memo from Linda A. Knopinski, Housing Administrator and Frances Buck Jonas, Executive Director, EHA, was then introduced for discussion. Ms. Jonas stated the main thrust here was putting a collection agency into the process so that delinquent accounts would be turned over to a professional collection agency. Ms. Jonas further added that Linda Knopinski had talked to three companies, two of which were not interested in dealing with the problem because there was not enough volume, the amount of each debt was too small; and because of the fact that the tenants were simply not collectable. In many cases, the tenants do not have jobs and there is no way to attach wages. Ms. Knopinski did find one collection agency who for a fairly rea- sonable amount was willing to work at collecting past rents. EHA Vice-Chairman Beier added that she liked to see the effort to collect these debts made simply for the principle of the matter. Chairman Burns asked if this memo was just informational or was the policy to be adopted. At this point, Ms. Jonas said the Board needed to adopt this policy as an addendum to the attached Resolution. MOTION VALERIE LASH MOVED AND VICE-CHAIRMAN BETTY BEIER SECONDED THE MOTION TO ADOPT THE ADDENDUM TO FURTHER CLARIFY THE COLLECTION POLICY OUTLINED IN RESOLUTION NO. 5 OF 1983. THE MOTJOH CARRIED AS FOLLOWS : AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, BEIER, LASH NONE PETERSON, BRADSHAW • I • • - • • • • -3-EHA Minutes, 3/28/84 Orchard Place Continued Chairman Burns then introduced Item B-6 on the Agenda, Financial Statements for HUD. Executive Director Jonas said that these are the same types of financial statements go e over at the Work Sess ion for the years of 1982 and part of 1983. She reiterated that EHA Staff had asked for a sixty-day extension this year from HUD. The forms were re- turned from the Fee Accountant, Robert J. Sylvester, the day before they were due and sent to HUD on time. Ms. Jo nas added that they are the financial st ate ments for both the Public Housing and Section 8 Existing programs. Chairman Burns then proceeded to Item B-7, the HUD letter regarding acquisition programs. Executive Director Jonas found it interesting that HUD was doing this kind of program; because, she said, she did not realize that there was going to be anything available in public housing acquisition . Ms. Jonas further stated that HUD must have something in mind because they (HUD) were trying to get an idea of whether there was any interest. Ms . Jonas further stated she was not sure at the present time if the Englewood Housing Authority knew enough to ascertain whether there would be anything available for acquisition. She felt that perhaps this was something which could be used in an area recently discussed with the Assistant Director for Planning, Ms. Dorothy Romans. Chairman Burns pointed out that the letter was to be returned by March 30, 1984. Ms. Jonas e xp lained that in order to keep our options open, EHA Staff should put something in since there was not sufficient time to properly evaluate the situation. Ms. Beier stated that the three and four-bedroom houses have been unavailable for Section 8 Existing and wondered if the Housing Authority should request some. Ms. Jonas suggested that the houses could be rehabilitated and, if necessary, bedrooms added. It was decided that after confirming the demand for three and four-bedroom units with Leased Housing Manager, Joyce Brei, that a reasonable request would be submitted. Units to be possibly acquired could be identified later, if necessary. Item B-8 on the Agenda was next introduced by Chairman Burns, this being a memo from Linda A. Knopinski, Housing Administrator. Also included was the Orchard Place Occupancy Policy being recommended by Christy Wall, Public Housing Manager, concerning various items on extended families. Chairman Burns asked Ms. Wall to comment on this policy. The Public Housing Manager briefed the Board by stating that several persons had requested extended family members be allowed to live with them. Ms. Wall pointed out that since the apartments are so small, only one bedroom, that it was felt only married couples , or one person should be allowed to rent apart ments at Orchard Place. Ms. Wall further stated this was the main reason the policy was being requested. I • • • • • • -4-EHA Minutes, 3/28/8 4 Englewood Housing Author ity Executive Director, Frances Jonas , added that at Simon Cente r , a mother and daughter had requested they be allowed to share an apartment, but since those apart ments were also so small the request was denied. It was decided they should have separate apa rtments. Vice-Chairman Beier wondered at this point, about handicapped persons who needed f ul l-time at- tendents; asking is this policy would not restrict these people from the building. Ms. Wall agreed that it would exclude handi- capped persons needing attendan c e niaht and day, but pointed out that these persons were referred to the duple xes because of the two-bedroom unit designed especially for the handic apped . Ms. Beie r considered thi s a good idea, but could still concei ve of sit uations in which someone would desire an apartment and st ill need full-time help; to which Ms. Jonas replied that the situation had been tried in the past with nothing but trouble resultin g. MOTION VALERIE LASH MOVED AND VICE -CHAIRMAN BEIER SECONDED THE MOTION TO ADOPT THE ORCHARD PLACE OCCUPANCY POLICY. THE MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWES: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, BEIER, LASH NONE PETERSON, BRADSHAW Chairman Burns recommended a memo be prepared for the next Board Meeting regarding a similar policy for Simon Center. I I I. SIMON CENTER Chairman Burns introduced the Status Report for February on the Simon Center, Item C-1 on the Agenda. He commented that there was some good information contained in the Report; for instance, that the average age was 77, the median age, which he found particularly in- teresting, was 75, and that there were two sets of sisters. (Public Housing Manager, Ms. Christy Wall, departed from the meeting at this point). Mayor ProTem, Beverly Bradshaw was still absent from the meeting at this time; therefore, it was determined best to put off Community Development Director, Susan Powers' presentation on the Floyd Avenue Realignment until Ms. Bradshaw was present . Ms. Powers asked how often new Section 8 Existing allocations came out. Executive Director Jonas replied that it was yearly. Ms. Jonas added further that ft has been on the decline. Ms. Jonas said that the way it had been done in the last few years was that HUD had invit~d certain hou si ng authorities to make applications. last year, Englewood Housing Authority was not invited, but the year before had been . • I • • -• • • -5-EHA Minutes, 3/28/84 Ms. Powers asked how HUD did that, on what basis. Ms. Jonas pointed out that in the past, a notice was sent out and everyone would compete. However, in the past couple of years, Ms .Jonas said, certain Authorities were invited to submit applications at the end of the fiscal year. She added that she would ask HUD how the de- cision is made on which authorities are invited. IV. SECTION 8 EXISTING Chairman Burns then questioned Item D-1, the Section 8 Existing Status Report, Page Two. He pointed out that at the bottom of Page Two it said one landlord owed the Englewood Housing Authority $217.20. He asked if this was a payover. Ms. Jonas replied that it was ~ £~~e of ~omeon~ moving out without notice; and the c .1ec~ for that month had already been sent out before the landlord d1scovered the move. Ms. Jonas further explained that the checks go out some- where around the 25th of the month in order that they may arrive by the first of the next month. Chairman Burns brought up Item D-2 of the Agenda, the 1983 Financial Statements to HUD for the Section 8 Existing Program . Ms. Jonas noted that this year HUD owed the Englewood Housing Authority $749.20 on the year-end settlement. The Executive Director explained that the Statements indicated ex- cellent financial condition for the Section 8 Existing Program due to the $559,066.62 in the Project Account. Th1s is a reserve account which can be drawn upon to fund the program should the $523,726.00 Annual Contributions not be enough to cover the increase in rents. The total administrative expenses, Ms. Jonas said, were $46,004.72 which gave the Englewood Housing Authority a net income of $24,777.g6 which goes into the operating reserve of the EHA. Thus, the Executive Director explained, the Englewood Housing Authority has a cumulative operating reserve of $38,324.00, which is money earned by the Housing Authority. Therefore, this is money which the Housing Authority may spend, without HUD approval, in any way it chooses to spend it related to Assisted Housing. Chairman Burns commented that Section 8 Existing has been remarked at the Commissioners ' Councils as an area where a very nice looking balance sheet for the entire program may be built up . Executive Director J onas pointed out under Administrative Salaries, that her salary and that of Linda Knopinski, Housing Administrator, will be prorated and some of these salaries will be paid back to the City. Hs. Jonas said this had not been done yet because the reimburse- ment was done as part of the audit which was not going to be done until the City's audit is finished this year. I • • - • • • • • -6-EHA Minutes, 3/28/84 v. REHABILITATION PROGRAM Chairman Burns brought up the Rehab Status Report, Item E-1 on the Agenda. There was no comment or discussion on thi s item. Item E-2 was then presented to t he Board by Chairman Burns. Executive Director Jonas commented that she had requested the information con- tained in the Construction Section Status Report from Robb Short, Rehab ilitation Supervisor, in order to show the monthly activity in the construc tion section. At this point, Ms. Valerie Lash, brought up a concern which had been discussed at the last Rehab Loan Committee Meeting regarding the possibility of having investors who receive Rehab loans sign a stipu - lation stating that they will keep the property in good re pair for the 20 year term of the loan. After considerable discussion, it was decided that Staff would discuss this type of stipulation with the bank representative and EHA attorney to determine if this type of stipulation would be enforceable and if it would discourage landlords from taking part i n the program. The Board felt that a better answer would be some kind of City Housing Code enforcement involving mainte nance of rental properties similar to the Rental Licensing Program in the City of Boulder. Beverly Bradshaw joined the meeting at this point. The time being approximately 6 :15 p.m. Community Development Director, Susan Powers, made her presentation on the Floyd Avenue Realignment at this point. Present and proposed parking was discussed. Ms.Powers explained the landscaping and elevation changes which would be made. She also discussed the signage for the new lot which would designate parking for Malley Center and Simon Center, residents and visitors. Some of the landscape work and fencing was then explained by Ms.Powers and discussed among the Board Members. The Community Development Director also explained the expense of this work would be the City's since it was part of the whole realignment. She also stated that traffic counters were used to determine actual numbers of vehicles per day on Floyd Avenue; but, Ms. Powers explained, when a street is realign ed, it changes people's behavior. For example, people might use the street who had never used it before. It is estimated that there will be a 50 1 increase in traff ic alon g Floyd Avenue, Ms. Powers said. Considerable discu ssion took place about the realignment and parking lot changes. The possibility of sharing visitor parking space with Malley Center was also discussed • Chairm an Burns stated that he had no great personal objection to thi s plan since it had been handled in a fairly constructive manner. He also said he realized that the alternative was to take Floyd Avenue I • • - • • • • -7-EHA Minutes, 3/28/84 straight through on the other side of Broadway and st r aighten it out; but his understanding was that this plan was c ost prohibitive . Chairman Burns then asked if someone wanted t o move to indicate a favorable reaction to the proposed Floyd Avenue Realignment. Vice-Chairman Beier stated that she felt the Authority should request as many new parking spaces as are being eliminated, and that the land should be attached to the Simon Center --an actual transfer of owner-ship. Ms. Jonas stated that Staff should keep track of times and numbers of vi sit or s parking their cars in the Simon Center parking lot. She pointed out that there was a need for specific data on this subject . Ms. Lash stated that at this time, it would be difficult to make an educated decision since not all the facts were in on this matter. She suggested a letter be sent to Council letting them know of the Authority's feelings on this matter. Chairman Burns said that the most the Housing Authority could say is that the Board indicated it's positive reception of the plan subject to several items needing further study and clarification . These items would be enumerated in the letter to Council. Ms. Powers said that a letter to the City Manager had already been done stating the concerns raised by the Authority. The City Manager had taken it to Council. Mr. Burns indicated that there should be a follow up, a direct communication from the Housing Authority. Chairman Burns brought up Item E-3, Status of 19B2 CDBG and 1983 City Funds Report from Janet Grimmett, Housing Finance Specialist. Ms. Jonas s aid that the Rehabilitation applications now being processed will commit all monies, and the Enolewood Housing Autho rity was eagerly anticipating the 1984 funding. She said EHA was applying for another $100,000.00 from the State Division of Housing as of the first of April. She anticipated receiving approximately $50,000.00. Also, Ms. Jonas stated that one of the staff persons reviewing the Fiscal Year 1984 CDBG Application was very impressed with EHA's program and application; meaning, she said, that we should get a good staff report and have a good chance of being funded. Chairman Burns then brought Item E-4, regarding the tax the Rehabilitation Program. Representative, Tom Dinkle, that the Loan Agreement met up the letter to Bob Moch, EHA Attorney, exempt status of the bank loan to EHA for The Executive Director stated that Bank and EHA Attorney Moch were still satisfied the requirements for tax exemption. • I • • • • • • -8-EHA Minute s , 3/28/84 Item E-5 on the Ag e nda, Request to Extend Bank Loa n Agreement and Item E-6, letter from Tom Dinkle regarding Lo an Agreement Extension were next discussed. Chairman Burns told the Board that there was a letter in the packet which he had sent to Tom Dinkle and a copy of one to Nick Panetta, Vice President of Republic National Bank. Executive Director Jonas explained that what was being req ues ted wa s an extension to the term of the Loan Agreement con tract between Englewood Housing Authority and the First Interstate Bank of Engle- wood of one year. This money, Ms. Jonas said, would be use d along with the additional money the EHA would recei ve from t he State and CDBG Grant. Chairman Burns expressed his reservations about the length of the extension in terms of time, but said that Mr. Dinkel felt that the EHA should get moving on this program. Vice-Chairman Beier asked if there was a chance that more time would be spent promoting the Pass Through Loans; to which Ms. Jonas answered that two Pass Through Loans had been approv ed during the month of March, as well as a subsidized loan. Chairman Burns asked if there was a particular type of outr each done for Pass Through Loans. Executive Director Jonas explained that since the extension had not been approved yet, no outreach had been done because it was felt by EHA Staff that it would not be desirous to have people applying for something which may or may not be a p- proved. But, Ms. Jonas said , when we are ready to do some outreach, the EHA would work with City Public Relations Sp ecialist, Dorothy Dalquist and Janet Grimmett to put together a city -wi de campaign explaining exactly what the Pass Through Progra m is and what the requirements for it are. Chairman Burns then brought up Item E-7, the ARRP Status Report. He expressed his regrets at missing the house tour that afternoon. Vice-Chairman Beier said the home was very attractive, and added that the sidewalk would be completed when the weather became decent. Ms. Beier also said that the home would look quite nice when there was furniture in it. She emphasized that the home was light and airy because of the nice windows. She told the Boa r d that the kitchen countertops had been redone along with the kitchen floor and related that there was a space in the back hall for a washer and dryer. A new furnace and a new water heater were also installed. Vice-Chairman Beier also told the Board that she felt the duplexes across the street were quite attractive, but the west side was General Iron Works which was ghastley looking. She felt so mething had to be done to block out the view of General Iron Works or nobody would buy the building with that particular view to the west . I • • • • • • -9-EHA Minutes, 3/28/84 Executive Director Jonas then told the Board about the house at 434 Clayton in Denve r . She said there was a family whose home at 4235 S. Delaware had been condemned by the City's Bu i lding Depart- ment. She said the EHA had been working with them , they had a verbal committment from the FHA, were waitin g for the written commit- tment, but had not received it as yet from the Savings and Loan . Therefore, Ms. Jonas said , EHA would now be able to work with these people and put the donated house on their lot after de molition of the condemned house. The next item discussed by the Board was the Board of Adjustment and Appeals guidelines. Mr. Burns said he submitted the application for variances on the duple xes and triple x . The units need to be sold as single-family attached units rather than sold as a building to a single owner. Ms. Jonas did not ant icip ate any real problems with the Board of Adjustments which would meet April 11, 1984. Chairman Burns asked if Robb Short, Housing Rehab Supervisor , planned to go to the Adjustment Board Meeting. Ms. Jonas said that he would. She expressed her opinion that it would be a good idea i f everyone involved got together and discussed the testimony in advance. Chairman Burns agreed with that idea and said that Mr. Short had to stick to legal issues in the guidelines. Executive Director Jonas said that usually the owner-developer wa s accompanied by counsel at those kinds of meetings. Item E-8 on the Agenda, the letter to Sanford Comp an ies regarding not accepting the donation of the house located at 358 West Belleview Avenue in Englewood was noted. VI. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE Item F-1 the City Fair Housing Month Proclamation was then introduced and discussed by the Executive Director. Item F-2, the Accounting Analysis was discussed next. Ms. Jonas stated that Gregg Gibson and Mr. Sylvester of the fee accounting firm would be in the EHA office during the next week to discuss the accounting procedures of the Englewood Housing Authority. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw wanted to see how an accounting c lerk would fit into the EHA accounting checks and balances system before the permanent position was authorized. Ms . Jonas talked about hiring a temporary accounting clerk from TOPS to take over the accounting work on a temporary basis. • I • • - • • • • • • -10-EHA Minutes, 3/28/84 t40T I ON MAYOR PRO TEM BEVERLY BRADSHAW MOVED AND VALERIE LASH SECONDED THE MOTION THAT THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD AUTHORIZE THE HIRING OF A TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE WHO WOULD HELP WITH THE ACCOUNTING WORK. AYES: NAY S : ABSENT: BURNS, BEIER, BRADSHAW, LASH NONE PETERSON Item F-2, Filing Consultant Proposals, was next discussed. The filing system presently used by the EHA was discussed and Executive Director Jonas said it was unacceptable in that item s filed were often not retrievable in a reasonable amount of time . Chairman Burns asked Ms . Jonas if she wanted to evaluate the two proposals received on revamping the system. Ms. Jonas indicated that she desired to do an evaluation of what was wanted by the EHA and what was offered by the two companies. It was generally agreed by the Board that the proposal from Austin Associates was the more professional of the two, and Ms . Jonas said that they were totally professional during their v i sits to the office. Chairman Burns indicated a need to set a meeting date for the six- month eval~ation of the Executive Director. Ms. Bradshaw told the Board about the Great Relay Race on June 10 and indicated her desire to have a team from the Housing Authority or the City. MOTION MS. VALERIE LASH MOVED AND MS. BEIER SECONDED THE MOTION THAT THE MARCH 29, 1984 MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD BE ADJOURNED. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8 :30 p.m. AYES : NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, BEIER, LASH, BRADHSAW NONE PETERSON u/uv ' ~4.~7L/ Mar~/Ryan~ R cording Secretary • I • • • • • • • The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Englewood !lousing Authority Board of Commissioners, held March 28, 1984, stand approved as submitted . 0-v, AA ~_J__&_d_F--~..d (3>'-J~ii.ces Buck Jon Executive Direct • I • • - • • • • • ~IINUTES ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY A Regular Meeting April 25, 1984 The Regular Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority was called to order at 5:20 p.m. on April 24, 1984, by Vice-Chairman Betty Beier, at Simon Center, 3333 South Lincoln, Englewood, Colorado 80110. ROLL CALL Members Present : Members Absent: Also Present: Betty Beier -Vice Chairman Beverly Bradshaw-Member (Present after 5:3 7p .m.) Valerie Lash -Member Cindy Peterson -Member Thomas J. Burns-Chairman Frances Buck Jonas -Executive Director, EHA Robb Short -Housing Rehab Supervisor Marie Gutterres -President, Orchard Place Tenant Council Maudie Wi lson ·-Secretary, Orchard Place Tenant Council Mary A. Ryan -Recording Secretary The Vice-Chairman declared a quorum to be present. II. READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES llinutes of the February 29, 1984, Annual t·leeting were read and approved with Amendments as follows : Amendment No. 1: /\mendment No. 2: Amendment No. 3: Amendment No. 4: Amendment No. 5: Add time meeting was called to order, date of meeting, address of meeting to first paragraph. Jl.dd Roll Call Add Cindy Peterson as the person who nomin a ted Thomas J. Burns for Chairman of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners to the First paragraph. Add Valerie Lash as the person who nominated Betty Beier as the Vice-Chairman of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners to Second paragraph • Add time of adjournment of Annual Meet ing. I • • • • • • Minutes, Regular Meeting EHA Board of Commissioners April 25, 1984 Page Two The Minutes of the February 29, 1984, Regular Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners were read and approved with the amendments as follows : Amendment No. 1: Amendment No. 2: Amendment No. 3: Page one, Public Housing, Second paragraph, third line, delete "them " add "the Board " in lieu thereof. Page one, Public Housing, Status Reports, Second paragraph, third line, change "she" to "Ms. Jonas". Page three, Sect i on 8 Ex isting, letter fro m Ed Carrera, HUD Branch Chief, Second paragraph fourth and seventh lines, change "she " to "Ms. Miller". The Minutes of the March 28, 1984, Regular Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners were read and approved with the amendments as follows: Amendment No. l: Amendment No. 2: Amendment No. 3: Amendment No. 4 : Amendment No . 5: Page three, Orchard Place, fifth paragraph, eighth line, delete entire sentence: "Ms. Wall cited an example of one young man who wanted his friend to live with him." Page four, Orchard Place, Third paragraph, delete entire paragraph. Add "Chairman Burns recommended a memo be prepared for the next Board Meeting re- garding a similar policy for Simon Center." in lieu thereof. Page seven, Rehabilitation Program, Third para- graph, delete "hold out for as many parking spaces as possible" add "request as many new parking spaces as are being eliminated", in lieu there- of. Page eight, Rehabilitation Program, Sixth para- graph, eighth and ninth lines, add "city wide " campaign within the ... Delete "tar g et areas " add "city wide campaign ", delete "of the City". Page nine, Rehabilitation Program, Second para- graph sixth through eighth lines. Delete "and this was also the opinion of Dorothy Romans, Planning Director, as far as getting these vari- ances was concerned." • I • • - • • • • ,. • Minutes, Regular Meeting EHA Board of Commissioners April 25, 1984 Page Three MOT! ON IT WAS MOVED BY VALERIE LASH AND SECONDED BY CINDY PETERSON THAT THE MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HELD FEBRUARY 29, 1984; THE MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COM- MISSIONERS HELD FEBRUARY 29, 1984; AND THE MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MHTING OF THE ENGLn/OOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HELD MARCH 28, 1984, BE APPROVED AND ACCEPTED WITH THE AMENDME"TS NOTED. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BEIER, BRADSHAW, LASH, PETERSON NONE BURNS The Vice-Chairman declared the Motion carried. Cindy Peterson wondered at this point about any Minutes which might be missing. Frances Buck Jonas, Executive Director, stated that a review of the Minutes Book was in order and a report of which minutes were missing would be presented at the next meeting. III. PUBLIC HOUSING Duplexes The Status Report on the Duplexes was noted with brief discussion. Orchard Place The Status Report was noted. Beverly Bradshaw commented on the nursing care provided by the Home Health Care Professionals. It was the general consensus of the members that this was a necessary and worthwhile ser- vice. Marie Gutterres, President of the Orchard Place Tenant Council mentioned that the nurse was at Orchard Place once each month. The Maintenance Report was noted. Cindy Peterson commented about the snow on the sidewalk after the meeting on February 29, 1984. Frances Jonas said she would check with Frank McCoumb on the matter of snow removal. Vice-Chairman Beier brought up the subject of dates on the Status Reports. It was decided that a "from" and "to" date would be used on all Status Reports from this point on in order to more clearly state the time period covered by each report . I - • • • - Minutes, Regular Meeting EHA Board of Commissioners April 25, 1984 Page Four Item B-4, the On-The-Job Training for a Maintenance Worker was dis- cussed. Frances Jonas gave the Board some background on the man who is being considered for this position. His salary as a trainee was discussed as well as his salary if he should be hired as a full- time permanent employee after completion of the training period. Frances Jonas explained the researc h involved in the request to hire this person as a trainee which involved determining the maintenance needs of other housing authorities in the area; and coupled with Frank McCoumb's requests for additional maintenance help, it was deemed necessary to hire and train an additional maintenance worker . Ms. Peterson asked if this trainee would be eligible for public hous- ing while he was in training . Ms. Jonas replied that he would be eligible for public housing, but hopefully after his training was completed, he would then be able to f i nd adequate housing without public assistance and therefore make the Duplex where his family now resides available for another low income family. _tlOTION IT WAS MOVED BY BEVERLY BRADSHAW AND SECONDED BY CINDY PETERSON THAT THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY THROUGH THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT WITH ARAPAHOE COUNTY EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING CENTER FOR THE EMPLOYMENT OF AN ON-THE-JOB MAINTENANCE • TRAINEE. • AYES: BEIER, BRADSHAW, LASH, PETERSON NAYS: NONE ABSENT: BURNS The Vice-Chairman declared the motion carried. Item B-5 on the Agenda, Acquisition with Rehab HUD Survey was noted with minimal discussion. IV. SIMON CENTER The Status Report for Simon Center was noted. sion concerning how the contract rent increase Ms. Jonas explained that the Annual Adjustment on the anniversary day of the contract and HUD Adjustment Factor for each part of the country There was some discus- was deter mined . factor goes into effect publishes the Annual in the Federal Register. Item C-2, Susan Power's Memo regarding Floyd Avenue Realignment was noted. Item C-3. letter from Thomas J. Burns to Mayo r Otis was also noted relative to the Floyd Avenue Realignment. · Item C-4. the Visitor Parking Survey was explained by Frances Jonas. Ms. Jonas and Beverly Bradshaw discussed the s haring of parking spaces at Simon Center with Malley Center. It was decided that approximately I • - • • • • • Minutes, Regular Meeting EHA Board of Commissioners April 25, 1984 Page Five five spaces could be shared since visitor parking space requirements at Simon Center tend to be greatest during the evenings, weekends, and holidays. Ms. Bradshaw would like to see a survey sent out to the tenant s of the Simon Center and Orchard Place concerning visitor parking spaces. Such questions as: a) Length of visitor's stay; b) when visitors visit most often, i.e., morning, afternoon, evening , weekends; should be on the questionnai re. Ms. Beier wondered if this questionnaire could be included in the monthly newsletter "S imon Sez". After some discussion with Marie Gutterres, Pr es ident of Tenant Council at Orchard Place, it was noted that the tenants of Orchard Place had adequately worked out most of the problems they encountered with visitor and tenant parking. v. SECTION 8 EXISTING Item D-1, the Section 8 Existing Status Report was noted with mi nimal discussion. VI. REHABILITATION PROGRAM The Status Reports for the Rehab Section and construction Section were noted. Robb Short, the Housing Rehab Supervisor reported on the work being done as far as handling emergencies with the money left in the Rehab Account. The Loan Default Status on the Rehab Status Report was discussed. Items E-3 and E-4 were noted, letters from Zadie and Mayor Otis respectively. The Board conveyed their pride in Robb Short and Janet Grimmett for jobs well done. Item E-5 was then discussed. The Deed of Trust was included in the EHA Board Packet because of questions raised concerning stipulations regarding upkeep of property. Ms. Jonas reported that she had dis- cussed this situation with EHA Attorney Robert Mach and he had re- ported that he had never encountered a situation in which the enforce- ment of this type of stipulation was considered. It was decided that this was not enforceable through the EHA and that a duplication of services would occur since Code Enforcement also does some of this kind of work. Item E-6, the Bank Loan Agreement Extension was noted and all Members of the Board concurred that the approval of the Extension was good news. I • • • • • • Minutes, Regular Meeting EHA Board of Commissioners April 25, 1984 Page Six Item E-7, the ARRP Status Report was noted . Robb Short indicated that bid packets are in the process of being compiled for 2758 South Delaware, in order to determine the cost of the program, including landscaping, by the next meeting . Frances Jonas reported that an appraisal is being done on the single family dwelling at 2758 South Delaware in order to determine what the actual market value is. Robb Short explained that the project at 4235 South Delaware, which used to be 435 South Clayton, was being used to set the guidelines for the remainder of the ARRP moves to be done with pre -qualifie d persons, as far as setting up the procedures with the ban k on the construction loan line-of-credit . Mr. Short a ls o pointed out th at all variances applied for in regard to the triplex and duplex were granted by unanimous vote by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals . The memo from Frances Buck Jonas regarding the 1984 CDBG Application, Staff Evaluation and Hearing Schedule was discussed. Frances Jonas explained that the EHA wa s now planning on a c ampaign to determine the needs of people in target area No. 2 who would be interested in this Rehab Program. This information will be used in the presentation to the CDBG Advisory Board. Frances Jonas then discussed the Utilities Service Proposals for Solar Retrofits at Orchard Place and Simon Center. The Executive Director pointed out that the Aurora Housing Authority had used this service. Ms. Jonas said she would discuss USA with Aurora and see how Aurora liked the service . VII. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE Item F-1, the Filing Proposal Analysis was discussed at length. Ms. Jonas analyzed the proposals of Austin Company and BRC A/I. It was the recommendation of the Executive Director, considering cost differences and impressions gained from office visits and the proposals submitted, that the EHA accept the proposal from the Aust in Company. MOTION IT WAS MOVED BY CINDY PETERSON AND SECONDED BY VALERIE LASH THAT THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BE AUTHORIZED TO HIRE AUSTIN COMPANY TO PROVIDE THE FILING SYSTEM FOR THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY. AYES: BEIER, BRADSHAW, LASH, PETERSON NAYS: NONE ABSENT: BURNS The Vice-Chairman declared the motion carried . • I • - • • • ' • • • • Minutes, Regular Meeting EHA Board of Commissioners April 25, 1984 Page Seven Item F-2 on the Agenda, Memo to EHA from Linda A. Knopinski regarding the 1983 Annual Report was next discussed. Ms. Jonas said that a small statement from each Board member for the 1983 Annual Report along with a picture of each Board member was desired. It was noted at this time how much the EHA Board enjoyed the input of Marie Gutterres and Maudie Wilson, Tenant Council Members from Orchard Place regarding the parking spaces at Orchard Place for visitors and tenants, and also the information regarding the nur$ing care provided by the Home Health Care Professionals. It was decided at this time that a permanent slot on the EHA Board Meeting Agenda should be provided for Tenant Council. Marie Gutterres stated that it was her opinion that the tenants of Orchard Place are finding out that the Tenant Council is a good way to get problems solved regarding Orchard Place. Ms. Beier asked at this time about the status of the Audit Report. Ms. Jonas replied that the EHA Audit would not be done until the City Audit was complete. MOTION IT WAS MOVED BY CINDY PETERSON AND SECONDED BY VALERIE LASH THAT THE APRIL 25, 1984, REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BE ADJOURNED. AYES: BEIER, BRADSHAW, LASH, PETERSON NAYS: NONE ABSENT: BURNS The Vice-Chairman declared the motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 8:25 p.m . • I • - • ' • • • • The Minutes of th~ Regular Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, held April 25, 1984, stand approved as submitted. --~<¥YMAA A Cha i Wa~·~14'-V~ -dA~~J --~'l(i. \.C(.. ')_ Frances Buck Jon Exe c utive Dir e c • I • • • I. CALL TO ORDER. • • • URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY April 25, 1984 5 R The Special Meeting of the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority was called to order at 7:00 P. M. by Vice-Chairman Novicky. Members present: Totton, VanDyke, Cole, Minnick, Neal, Novicky Non-voting Alternate Mcintyre Executive Director Susan Powers Members absent: Voth Also present: Economic Development Director Hinson Mr. Novicky read a letter from Robert Voth, Chairman of the Urban Renewal Authority, which letter was d i rected to Mayor Otis. Mr. Voth is requesting a l eave of absence from the Authority until such time as the leasehold and property acquisitions in the 3300 block of South Broadway are settled by Brady Corporation, or are in litigation. Mr. Voth is a businessman in this block, and is requesting the leave of absence to eltainate any possible charges of conflict of interest. II . REVIflo/ OF LEASEHOLD NEGOTIATIONS. Ks. Powers stated that Mr. Marlin Opper.an, attorney for the Urban Re- newal Authority, will be arriving s hortly . Minnick moved: VanDyke s econded: Th e Urban Renewal Autho rity go into Execut i v e Ses s ion to con- s ider the leasehold negotiations by Brady Corporation . AYES : Van Dyke, Cole , Minnick, Nea l , Novicky, Totton NAYS: No ne ABSENT: Voth The motion carried. * * * * * Me. Opperman arrived during the Executive Session . Mr. Mcintyre excused himself from the meeting at 9:10 P. M. * * * * * Minnick moved: VanDyke seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority c o -ou t of Executive Session. AYES: Cole, Minnick , Neal, Novicky , Totton , VanDyk e NAYS: None ABSENT: Voth The 1110tion carried • • I • • • • • • -2- Discussion ensued. VanDyke moved: Cole seconded: The staff be asked to prepare a resolution finding that good faith negotiations have been co nducted hy Brady Corporation in the matter of the l e asehold agreements with tenants at the following addresses: 3315 South Broadway, 3333 South Broadway, 3365 South Broadway, 3340 South Acoma Street, 3378 South Acoma Street, and 33 West Girard Avenue; further, that there have been good faith negotiations on the part of Brady Corporation in the acquisition of the property at 3311 South Broadway. The staff is to conduct a telephone poll of the Authority members following the preparation of the Resolution to obtain the vote of the individual members on the actual resolution. AYES: Cole, Minnick, Neal, Novicky, Totton, VanDyke NAYS: None ABSENT : Voth The motion carried. Mr. Nuvicky stated that Ms. Powers had a report regarding some of the prope cty owned by the Authority. Ms. Powers stated that during this latest snowstorm, the building at 3550-54 South Broadway collapsed. A contract for demolition is being prepared and will be expedited to avoid being cited by the City for an unsafe structure. Bids will be obtained on the demolition of the structure, and a report will be made to the Authority at the next meeting . Brief discussion ensued. The meeting adjourned at 9:30 P. M. x. _, -tu.-& ~ I Gertrude G. Welty /! Recording Secretary • • • • • SECRETARY 'S NOTE: A telephone poll was conducted on April 27, 1984 on Resolution 813, 1984. AYES: NAYS: Novicky, Minnick, Cole, Neal, Totton, VanDyke None Mr. Voth was not contacted inasmuch as he was not in att ndanc at th 11 eting of April 25. gw I • • - t ( • • • • • URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY May 2, 1984 I. CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority was called to order by Vice-Chairman Novicky at 5:50 P. M. Members present: Novicky, Totton, Cole, Minnick No n-voting Alternate Member Mcintyre Susan Powers, Executive Director Members absent: Neal, VanDyke, Voth Also present: Economic Development Planner Hinson Director of Engin eering Services Gary Di ede URA Negotiato r Sco tt McDowell Steve Bell, Hanifen-Imhoff II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. April 4, 1 984 Mr. Novicky stated that the Minutes of Apr il 4, 1984 , were to be co n-sidered for approval. Tot ton moved: Cole seconded: The Minutes of April 4, 1984 be approved as written. AY ES : Novicky, Totton, Cole , Minnick NAYS: No n e ABSENT: VanDyke, Voth, Neal The motion carried. Mr . Novicky welcomed Ms. Rosemary LaPorta, Messrs. Coleman, Cordova, Robohm and Sachter to the meeting. Mr. Novicky stated that the Auth o rity did have an extensive agenda for the meeting, but that the Public Forum section would be moved up to follow the pre-scheduled guests Diede and Bell. III. NEW BUSINESS. A. Huller Engine ring -Increase in Fees. Hr. Diede displayed drawings of the proposed water system along Little Dry Creek which drawings were in three parts: the Lower Falls, the Middle Falls, and the Upper Falls. Hr . Diede stated that the falls have been made a feature of the water system to provide seriation, which will assist in the elimination of algae from the water. Mr. Diede then addressed two requests from Huller Engine ring for n incr ase in the fees for the Civic Center Boulevard design. The first B 4 I • - • • • • -2- r e quest for an additional $8 ,000 i s necessitated by the relocatio n of the sanitary sewer lin es , and the necessity to go under the box culvert at Little Dry Creek . The lin e will have to be longer than originally planned, and an inverted siphon will have to be designed . Mr. Diede th e n discus sed th~ second requ es l fo r an i n c r ease in f ees , whi ch is n ecessit ated by the n eed for a cceleration and d eceler atiun lanes along U. S . 285 at So uth Cherokee Street; this is at the requ est of the State Highway Department . This increase r e qu est is $5 ,000 . The original contract wit h Muller Engineering wa s for $1~8 ,0 7 0; th e two requests, totalling $13,000, will increase the amo unt of the contract for Civic Center Boulevard design to $211,070. Mr . Diede stated that we are in th e final design stage o n the Bou levard now, a nd that he did not anticipate additional reques ts for fee increases . Mr. Novicky asked how th e acceleration/decleration l anes on U.S . 285 at South Cherokee Street will mesh with the lane at South Elati Street. Mr. Diede stated that he is of the opinion that the lanes will mesh properly. Mr . No vicky asked fo r a motion t o approve the increase of design fees for Muller Engineering in the amount of $1 3,000 for sewe r design and design of the highway imp r ovements . Minnick moved: Totton seconded: The Urban Renewal Autho r ity approve the request of Mul ler Engine ring for an increase in design f ees in t he amount of $13 ,000 for additio n al sewer design work, and the design of the acceleration/deceleration l an s on U. S. 285. AY ES: To tton , Cole , Minnic k, Novicky NAYS: Non ABS ENT : VanDy , Voth, .eal The mo tion carri d. B. Street Lights and Signals -Civic Center Boulevard . Mr. Diede discussed a need to begin ordering such items as st reet light s and signals to be used along Civic C nter Boulevard in the very near future. Mr. Diede noted that th Boulevard is scheduled for completio n in November, and there is a 12-week delivery time on some o f the items. Mr . Diede discussed the style of poles that is being considered , and displayed a drawing of a typical pole , mastarm , signal heads, and light combination. Mr . Diede stated that poles , mastarms , signal heads and traffic controllers will have to be purchased. The Public Works Depart- ment of the City wmts a larger traffic controller than wh at was budgeted, a nd have agreed to provide labor to install some of th e signal equip- ment, and t o provide $27,000 to match th increased cost of the larger co ntroller. Th total estimated cost for this equipment is $168,000, and th requ est is that the e n gineers be allowed to negotiat e for and ord er then d d equipment • • I • • ( • • • • -3- Mr. Mcintyre asked why the drawing depicted three signal s on the ma s t a~. Mr. Diede stated that one signal head is required for each lane of traffic. Mr. Minnick questioned the lighting of the intersections as compared to the lighting along the Boulevard itself; he was of the opinion that there is a difference in the lighting. Mr. Diede stated that he understood the lighting to be the same, but along the Boulevard, the lighting would be alternated. At the intersections, a light would be on each corner. Mrs. Cole asked if the $168 ,000 es timat e wa s what was budgeted for the lighting and signalization. Mr. Diede stated that this would not be ex- ceeding the budget. The $168,000 would include the $27,000 which would be contributed by the Traffic Division on toward the larger master traffic controller. Mr. Novicky asked i f there were any questions of Mr. Diede. He then stated that the Chair would entertain a motion that the Autho rity allow the engineers to negotiate and o rder the signalization and st reet lighting equipment. Minnick moved: Cole seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority grant approval to the engineers to begin negotiations and ordering of traffic signalization and street lighting equipment, total cost not to exceed $168,000 . AYES: Cole, Minnick, Movicky, Totton NAYS: None ABSENT: VanDyke, Voth, Neal The motion carried. C. Tax Increment Bond Issue. Mr. St ve Bell of Hanifen-Imhoff, was present to discus the bond issue. Mr. Bell stated that he want e d to review the status of th financing, and review the schedules that have been devised for th bo nd anticipation notes. He stated that they are in the process of drafting the required documents and agreements. Mr. Bell stated that the financing schedule was reviewed with the City Council on April 30th; a r evised draft on Schedule II is due on May 3rd. Mr. Bell stated that within the next 10 to 14 days, it is anticipated that the documents will b drafted, and will b submitted to the Authority for their review. Mr. B 11 emphasized th n d for careful reading and review on the part of th Authority mem- bers; a representativ of the Authority will have to sign off that the documents are correct. Mr. Bell furth r reviewed the proposed schedule for th bond notes, and pointed out that May 21 is the date scheduled for the official relea e and market in of th bonds. Mr. Bell stated that the "municipal cal end r" must be taken into account; it would not be wise to releas th bond for th Authority on that d te if there are several other municlp~l bond is- au s on the same date. Mr. Bell stated that th Authorit y will hav to approv a Bond Resolution. Mr. Bell stated that the ch dule that has b n proposed is a "fast-track" schedule , and it is posaibl that ther will b del ys. H noted that member of the Authority should plan to • I • - • • • • -4- be available for the next four to six weeks for spec ial meetings re- ga rding the bond issue. Mr. Bell then discussed in g r eater detail the Bond Pu r chase Ag reement, the Bond Re s olution, Trust Indenture, a n d Official Statement, all do cu- me nts whic h will have to be ca r efully read a nd reviewed by the Authority. Mr. Bell stated that the initial thought had been to have two bond is- suances, Phase I being issued in late Spr ing of 1984, and Phase II being issued later this year or the first part of 1985. Mr . Bell stated that they now feel the security is available to issue both phases at the same time, and there is no indication that interest rates will be any better in late Fall or early next year. By issuing bo th phases now, the Authority can take advantage of a better interest rate now in selling the bonds, and a higher interest rat e on reinvestment of the bo n d pro- ceeds. Mr. Bell then discussed the financing secu rity structure, wh ich is broken into three facets: 1) the land purchase agreement with the developer; 2) escrow disbursement procedure by th e Trustee Bank ; and 3) unsecured proceeds. Mr. Bell stated that the t o t al project cost is estimated at $11,800 ,000. The total bond iss u e will be $14,900 ,000. Mr. Bell stated that with the redevelopment currently underway, such as the new King Soopers , he did feel that the "unsecured" bonds could be financed with the i n come generated. Mrs. Cole asked about insurance on the bonds; did she understand that there would be n o insurance on the short-term notes . Mr. Bell s tat ed that there is interest in insuring the bonds after some develo pm e nt oc- curs, but the insurance companies do not want to insure the bonds up front. He s tated that the bond issue will not have a rating now; a rating will probably be g iven in the future --say three years from now. The idea now i s to do a short-term nonrated note issue. Mr. Bell discussed the differenc in th project cost of $11,810,000 and the amount of the issu which is $14 ,900,000. He stated that the bond issue will need to be large enough to cover interest exp n ses on the bond s until sufficient revenue from the redevelopment comes in, o r over the next three years. Mr. Bell discussed "capitalized interest", or the investment of money borrowed at one rate of interest and invested at a higher rate of in-terest. Ms . VanDyke entered the meeting at 6:45 P. M. Mr. Bell noted that the source of income to retire the bond s will he the sales and property tax increments within the tax increment district over the next twenty years. Mrs. Cole asked if the notes would be for three years or four y rs. Mr. B 11 stated that th notes would be a four year issu , with a thre year call option. Th signing of th Bond Purchas Agreement by th r dev lop r wa dis- cuss d at greater length • I • - ( • • • • -5- Mr. Bell discussed Schedule III, which is an estimate of expenditures by month. Mr. Totton asked if the funds transferred from the City wer e to be used for these expenditures. Ms. Powers stated that the funds transferred from the City are already committed. Schedule IV, a Cash Flow Analysis through June of 1987, was discussed . Mr. Totton asked what the deposits would be in CD's or what. Mr. Bell stated that the deposits could be in T-bills, notes, bonds or obligations guaranteed by the government --CD's , etc. Mr . Bell stat ed that if there is more than $100,000 for deposit, negotiation for a "super CD" can be done. Mr. Hinson asked the arbitrage difference. Mr. Bell stated the dif- ference is three to four points. Mr. Minnick asked what the trustee bank would charge for their service. Mr. Bell stated that he felt most trustee banks had a fixed schedule, and cited charges in a recent bond issue, which were: study of documents --$3,000; legal fees --$1 ,500; annual administrative fees --$2,500. Mr. Bell reiterated that the fees are pretty much the same no matter which bank is the trustee. Ms. Powers stated that consideration is being given to designating the Director of Finance for the city as the disburser of the funds; he is doing this same function on City-related bond issues. By combining the funds from the Urban Renewal Authority bond issue with the City funds, perhaps better investments could be made, although the interest income would be segregated and credited to the individual body. Mr. Bell stated that it is better to have an individual representing the Authority than to have a bank do it. Mr. Bell stated that authorizing the spending of funds from the bond issue is the responsibility of the Authority; only by action of the Authority can these funds be disbursed. Further discussion ensued. Ms. Powers noted that in Schedule II, a section is designated as administrative expenses of the Urban Renewal Authority, and $350 ,000 was budgeted; she stated that this will be used for legal fees, etc. that were to be reimbursed by the bond issue. The Authority does have an agreement with the City t o provide administrative services to the Authority, and these services were to be reimbursed from the bond proceeds, but in all likelihood, the reimbursement will cover the legal fees. Mr. Novicky stated that the Authority will have a lot of work ahead of it for the next six weeks; if a member of the Authority will not be available to please let the staff know. Mr. Novicky expressed the ap- preciation of the Authority to Mr. Bell for his presentation. IV. PUBLIC FORUM. Mr. Novicky asked if the guests wanted to address the Authority. Mr. Ed Cordova stat d that he is a businessman in the 3400 block of South Bro dway. H has received som unofficial information that part of th 3400 block of South Broadway will b taken over by the Brady D - velopm nt Corporation and that plan to that effect have b n submitted to • I • • - 0 • • • • -6- the City. Is the Urban Renewal Authority going to hold the condemnation "umbrella" over downtown Englewood so that Brady can continue to take over these properties. The o riginal redevelopmen t plan wa s for the area west of the Sou th Broadway/South Acoma Street alley; has thi s plan changed. If someone does not want to sell, would this club be he l d over them. Ms. Powers stated that the Plan has not been chan ged. The Plan as ap- proved does not include the acquisition of the 3400 block o f South Broad- way by th e Urban Renewal Authority. Any plan that Brady Co rporation may have for this block is not endorsed by the Urban Renewal Author ity, nor have any plans been formally presented to the City. Brady Corporation has been told by the staff that the City is not interested in that block, and that Brady Corporation does have commitments to the Urban Renewal Authority to develop other properties. Mr. Cordova stated that he understands the redeveloper wants the north half of the 3400 block for a new Key Savings building. Ms. Powers stated that Brady is negotiating with Mr. Fiedelman on the purchase of his property, part of which is necessary for the Boulevard right-of-way. The negotiations are between two private entities, and the Authority is not involved. Mr. Cordova asked if it is likely that Key Savings cannot be located somewhere west of the alley (Broadway/A coma alley) that the redev eloper would come into the 3400 block of South Broadway. Ms. Powers pointed out the area that she understands Brady is negotiating on, and that he has mentioned the construction of an "L" shaped building along Gi r ard Avenue and South Acoma Street, which would encompass the Fiedelman prop- erty on West Girard Avenue. Mr. Cordova asked if the redeveloper could ask for City help in acquiring these properties. Ms. Powers reiterated that the City is not interested in redevelopment of the 3400 block at this time. Mr. Cordova stated that he did not want to see what happened in the 3300 block of South Broadway occur in the 3400 block. Mr. Cordova stated that he would not oppose improvement in this block if it is done by private sector. People should be able to decide whether they want to sell their business . Mr. Cordova stated that he moved the location of his business three years ago, and paid $50 ,000 to set up his new store. lie stated that he is thinking about some of the oth r merchants in this area, and that he would like to see some of "old Englewood" remain. Ms . Powers suggested that Mr. Cordova contact Brady Corporation directly to discuss plans for the 3400 block of South Broadway. Mr. Cordova stated that he has done this, and understood that within the last 10 days, tentative plans were submitted to the City for the redevelopment of th 3400 block. Ms. Powers reiterated that Brady Corporation has been in- formed that the City does not want to deal with the 3400 block South Broadway at this time. Ms. LaPorta asked when the merchants in the 3300 block South Broadway hav to be out. Ms. Powers stated that for thos merchants who s ttl d with Brady Corporation, sh w s not aware of th date they had to be out. For thos t nants who will b negotiating with the Urban Renewal • I • • ( • • • .. • -7- Authority, the Authority has yet to authorize the negotiation proces s to begin. Mr. Barry Coleman stated that he is a member of the EDDA, and owner of Barry's Paint Store. He stated that he had attended the public hearing before the City Council on April 30th; while he understands that City Council could not question some of the proceedings, he questioned the thoroughness of the Urban Renewal Authority in determining that good faith negotiations did occur. He stated that he would like to ask each member if they "feel comfortable with your determination; do you feel undue pressure was used and was the Urban Renewal Authority used as a club . Have you learned anything from this experience to make better judgements in t h e f uture . You are citizens of Englewood, and we need to look to you for protection. A lot of nasty things were brought up, and [he] was not able to defend you or to accuse you. Would you be honest -- are you comfortable." Mr. Totton stated that he feels very comfortable with the decision. Mr. Totton stated that the Authority went through a packet o f privileged in- formation before reaching their decision. Mr. Totton stated that he also attended the Public Hearing on April 30, and it is his opinion that only one side of the story was being presented to the City Council, and pointed out that the Authority could not present a good portion of the informa- tion they had because it is privileged. Mr. Totton stated that he would not be comfortable expanding the Plan into the 3400 block of South Broad- ay. He feels that the redeveloper "should digest" what he is attempting to do now. Mr. Novicky stated that the Authority has been advised by legal counsel, because of pending litigation, of the necessity to determine good faith negotiations. The Authority did spend lots of time considering the material among themselves, and with the legal counsel, and keeping in mind the legal definition of "good faith negotiations." He stated that the Au- thority determinations is that the redeveloper did meet the criteria of good faith negotiations as set out in the Agreement between the Authority and the redeveloper. Mr. Coleman stated that if the Authority is facing litigation h could understand why they could not commit themselves. Mr. Coleman stated he would admit that sitting in the City Council meeting, and hearing the pleas that were made and not having the information the Authority has, he could se further problems, and was very distressed at the end of the meeting. He stated that he "wants to impress upon you as fellow c itizens the importance of your decision and the devastating results that can result"; give the greatest amount of consider at ion as is possible, and don't allow yourselves to be pressured by anyone for expediency's sake. Mr. Novicky stated that speaking for himself, he does feel the burden of responsibility in serving as an Authority member, but he does also feel that the Brady Corporation is working for the Authority and the City; he does feel that the Urban Renewal represents the citizens of Englewood. Mrs. Cole stated that the only thing that disturbs her about th situation is the fact that the redeveloper did not settle the matter of the lease- hold interests when he purchased the property. This would have eliminated any need for the Authority to step in. Mrs. Cole stated that the redevelop- ment will benefit a great many people. When a number of people are com- • I • • - • • • - -8- mitted t o an idea or a plan, it is difficult to let a f ew hold back pro- gress of the e n tir e plan . Mrs . Cole sta t ed that the Authority did spend a g r eat deal of t ime considerin g the n egotia tion s and contac ts made wit h each individ ua l , a nd felt t h a t the redevelop er has offer ed as much as he possibly could. Mr. No vic ky s t ated t h at it has been the policy of this boa r d, a n d o f the City Co unc i l, th a t cond emn a t ion would be used only as a la s t reso r t, and that i t canno t b e u sed by t he redeveloper . This is a r esponsibility t he Authority respects . It is the desir e of t he Authority t o make th e tran- sition peri od as eas y as po ss i b l e , but po int e d o ut that t he Authority does have f i nancial cons traints. Ms. LaP o rta aske d wh a t the r e d ev eloper plan s for the 3300 block. Ms . Power s stat e d tha t t he Ac oma Stree t s ide will have a parking structur e and new r e tail bus in es s will fr ont on So uth Br oadway . Ms . Powers pointed out that by the a gree ment b e tw een th e r e dev elo p e r and Kin g Soopers, th e s tore is s c hedul e d t o o pen on Decem b e r 1 , 19 84. Mr. No v icky aske d if the r e were further questions of the Authority . He thanked the audien ce for coming . Mr . Cordova than ked the Authority f or l i st e ning t o them. III. NEW BUSI NE SS . D. Demolit ion Pr ojects . Mr. Hinson s t a t ed that as reported at t he special mee ting of Ap r il 25 , t he roof of t he structure at 3550-54 South Broadway coll apsed un der t he weight of the s n ow s t o r m which hit on April 20 t h . Ther e was a n eed t o expe d i t e a co nt ract for demolition of t his s tructur e because it posed a health h azar d a n d was an unsafe building . Bids we r e r e ques t ed and three were received . In asking for the bids , demolition of the structure at 3601 South Logan Street was included, so the bids were to encompass demolition of two structures. Mrs. Cole asked if the Authority would receive any insurance benefits on the collapsed structure. Mr . Hinson stated that he had checked with the insurance company; their concern was with the parapet wal l which fell onto an adjoining building . It was Mr . Hinson's understanding that this adjoining building could not be used until the brick from 3550- 54 South Broadway was removed from the roof. Inasmuch as the structure at 3550-54 South Broadway was slated for demolition, it is unlikely that there would be a paymen t to the Authority. A claim filed against the Authority because of damage to the adjoining structure would be covered. Mrs. Cole noted that the structure at 3550-54 South Broadway has a base- ment; in the demolition process, will this basement be dug out and th e site leveled. Mr . Hinson discussed the topography of the site, and th e situation that could occur if the basement were to be totally dug out and the site sloped to the creek; it is the proposal to leave part of the "retaining wall" or part of the basement wall to prevent a possibl e accident if some motorist should jump the curb. The retaining wall could prevent the vehicle from going into the Creek. Mr. Hinson stated that the Authority is currently renting fencing along South Broadway for $150/month during the period of demolition • • I • • • • • - -9- Mrs. Cole asked if the basement area would be filled. Mr. Hinson s t at e d it would be. Mr. Mcintyre asked if the City owns 3601 South Logan Street. Ms. Powers stated that the Authority does own this property, and ob t ained it through condemnation. Mr. Hinson discussed the condemnation process on this prop- erty, and what steps yet have to be followed before the procedure is com- pleted. The Authority was granted immediate possession of the property on September 1, 1983, and can have the structure demolished. The Authority reviewed the proposed contracts for demolition. Mr. Novicky asked if the height of the fence should not be spelled out. Ms. Powers stated that fence requirements are listed in the Building Code and this would have to comply. Ms. Powers asked if the insurance figures were adequate. Mr. Hinson stated that there is a hold harmless provision, the Authority is covered by CIRSA, and the contractor is required to have insurance. Mr. Minnick asked if the site at 3601 South Logan Street would also be fenced during and after the removal of the structure and the gasoline tanks. Mr. Hinson discussed the problems of a safety hazard on the site, with the holes in the ground from the tanks, and problems of a fence with barbed wire on the top, and kids who might try to scale the fence. Mr. Mcintyre stated that after the tanks are removed, and the site is filled, would it be left as a "dirt pile" that the wind could blow across town. Ms. Powers stated that this site will eventually be developed as a small park or green area but not until the first part of next year. Channel improvements along Little Dry Creek have to be made prior to the landscaping. Mr. Minnick asked if there was anything salvagable from the structures. Mr. Hinson stated that he had received a call from someone wanting to move the structure at 3601 South Logan Street, but has not heard further. The previous owner was contacted some time ago, and told to remove any-thing of value. Minnick moved: Cole seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority reaffirm the contract with Eagle Wrecking Company for demolition of the structur at 3550-54 South Broadway, in the amount of $14,970. AYES: Cole, Minnick, Novicky, Totton, VanDyke NAYS: None ABSENT: Neal, Voth The motion carried. Minnick moved: VanDyke seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority award the contract for demolition of 3601 South Logan Street to Eagle Wrecking Company in the amount of $5,030. AYES: Cole, Minnick, Novicky, Totton, VanDyke NAYS: None ABSENT: Neal, Voth Th • I • • • • • - -10- IV . OLD BUSIN ESS . A. Property Acqu isition . Totton moved: VanDyke seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority go into Executive Session to conside r property acquisition. AYES: Minnic k, Novicky, To tton, VanDyke , Cole NAYS: None ABSENT: Neal, Voth * * * * * VanDyke moved: Cole seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority come out of Executive Session. AYES: Novicky, Totton, VanDyke, Cole, Minnick NAYS: None ABSENT: Neal, Voth The motion carried. Mr. Mcintyre excused himself from the meeting at 9:10 P. M. VanDyke moved: Totton seconded: The Urban Ren ewal Authority authorize Scot t McDo we ll t o accept the counte r off e r from Messr s . Buchanan a nd No rds trom of 34 30 South Bannock Stree t o f $75,000 . AYES: Novicky, Totton, VanDyke, Cole, Minnick Nays ; None ABSENT: Voth, Neal The motion carried . III. NEW BUSINESS. E. Resolution Authorizing Negotiations for Properties and/or Lease- hold Interests . Ms. Powers stated that the text of this Resolution has been approved by Mr . Opperman, legal counsel to the Au t hority. This resolution would authorize negotiations on properties and leasehold interests lis ted by the City Council for acquisition by the Authority . Mr . Novicky asked if the appraisal should not be more fully identified in the resolution--who did the appraisal . Mr . Hinson sta ted that Mr. Opperman indicated that this was not necessary. Mr. Novicky stated that he felt we should identify what the fair market value is. Mr. Hinson stated that Mr. Opperman stated that this form for the resolution is acceptable and proper. Discussion ensued. It was the co n census that the resolution s hould be amended to identify the appraiser • • I • - ( • Minnick moved: Cole seconded: • • • -11- The Urban Renewal Authority accept Re s olution #14, Se ri es of 1984 , A RESOLUTION OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY ASSERTINC: THAT THE APPRAISED VALUE AS DET ERMINED BY FOR TilE PROPERTY /LEASEHOLD INTEREST AT 3311 SOUTH BROADWAY, ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80110 IS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF SAID PROP ERTY/LEASEHOLD INTEREST, AND DIR ECTI NG THE AUTHORITY'S NEGOTIATOR TO USE SAID FAIR MARKET VAL UE AS THE BASIS OF NEGOTIATIONS TO ACQUIRE SAID PROfERTY/ LEASEHOLD INTEREST BY THE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY . The Authority further directs negotiator Scott HcDowell to commence negotiations on the acquisition of this property. AYES: Totton, VanDyke , Cole, Minnick, Novicky NAYS: None ABSENT: Voth, Neal The motion carried. Cole moved: Minnick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority accept Resolution #15, Series of 1984, A RESOLUTION OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AU- THORITY ASSERTING THAT THE APPRAISED VALUE AS DETERMI NED BY JOSEPH FARBER AND COMPANY, INC. FOR THE PROPERTY/LEASE- HOLD INTEREST AT 3315 SOUTH BROADWAY, ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80110 IS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF SAID PROPERTY/LEASEHOLD INTEREST, AND DIRECTING THE AUTHORITY'S NEGOTIATIOR TO USE SAID FAIR ~~ET VALUE AS THE BASIS OF NEGOTIATIONS TO ACQ UIRE SAID PROPERTY/LEASEHOLD INTEREST BY THE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY. The Authority directs negotiator Scott McDowell to com- mence negotiations on the acquisition of this leasehold interest. AYES: VanDyke, Cole, Minnick, Novicky, Totton NAY S : Non e ABSENT: Voth, Neal Th e motion c arried. Minnick moved: Cole s econde d: The Urban Renewal Authority accept Resolution #16, Series of 1984, A RESOLUTION OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AU- THORITY ASSERTING THAT THE APPRAISED VALUE AS DETERMI NED BY JOSEPH FARBER AND COMPANY, INC. FOR THE PROPER TY/LEAS E- HOLD INTEREST AT 3333 SOUTH BROADWAY, ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80110 IS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF SAID PROPERTY /LEASEl!OL D INTEREST, AND DIRECTING THE AUTHORITY'S NEGOTIATOR TO USE SAID FAIR MARKET VALUE AS THE BASIS OF NEGOTIA TIONS TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY/LEASEHOLD INTEREST BY THE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY. Further, the Authority directs negotiator Scott McDowell to commence negotiations on the acquisition of this lease- hold interest • • I • • - • • • • • -12- AYES: Totton, VanDyke , Cole , Min nick , Novicky NAYS: None ABSENT: Voth, Neal The motion carried. Cole moved: Minnick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority accept Resolution #17, Series of 1984, A RESOLUTION OF TH E URBAN RENEW AL AUTHORITY ASSERTI NG THAT THE APPRAISED VAL UE AS DETER- MINED BY JOSEPH FARBER AND COMPANY, INC . FOR TilE PROP- ERTY/LEASEHOLD INTEREST AT 3365 SOUTH BROADWAY, E CLEWOOD , COLORADO 80110 IS THE FAIR MARK~< VALUE OF SAID PR OPERTY/ LEASEHOLD INTEREST, AND DIRECTING THE AUTHORITY'S NEGOTIATOR TO USE SAID FAIR MARKET VALUE AS THE BASIS OF NEGOTIA TION S TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY/LEASEHOLD INTEREST BY THE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORTTY . Fu rthe r, the Authority directs negotiator Scott McDow e ll to commence negotiations on the acquisition of this leasehold interest. AYES: Va nDyke, Cole, Minnick, Novicky, Totton NAYS: None ABSENT: Voth, Neal The motion carried. Minnick moved: ~ole seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority accept Resolution #18, Series of 1984, A RESOLUTIO N OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AU- THORITY ASSERTING THAT THE APPRAISED VALUE AS DETER- MINED BY JOSEPH FARBER AND COMPANY, INC . FO R THE PROP- ERTY/LEASEHOLD INTEREST AT 3340 SOUTH ACOMA STREET, ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80110 IS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF SAID PROPERTY/LEASEHOLD INTEREST , AND DIRECTING THE AUTHORITY'S NEGOTIATOR TO US E SAID FAIR ~~RKET VALU E AS THE BASIS OF NEGOTIATIONS TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERT Y/ LEASEHOLD INTEREST BY THE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY. The Authority directs negotiator Scott McDowell to com- mence negotiations on the acquisition of this leasehol d interest. AYES: Totton , VanDyke, Cole, Minnick, Novicky NAYS: None ABSENT: Voth, Neal The motion carried. Totton moved: VanDyke seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority accept Resolution #19, Series of 1984, A RESOLUTION OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AU- THORITY ASSERTING THAT THE APPRAISED VALUE AS DETERMINED BY JOSEPH FARBER AND COMPANY, INC. FOR THE PROPERTY/ LEASEH OLD INTEREST AT 3370 SOUTH ACOMA STREET, ENGLEWOO D, COLORADO, 80110, IS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF SAID PROP ERTY / • I • • ( ( • • • • -13- LEASEHOLD INTEREST, AND DIREC TING THE AUT HORIT Y'S NEGOTIAT OR TO USE SAI D FAI R MARKET VALUE AS THE BASI S OF NEGOTIATIONS TO ACQUIRE SAID PROPERTY /LEASEHOLD INTEREST BY THE URBAN RENEW AL AUTH ORITY . Furth e r, the Auth ority dir ects n egotiator Scot t McDow 11 t o co mm ence n egotiations on th e acquisition o f this l easehold inte r est . AYES: Cole, Minnick, Novicky, Totton, VanDyke NAYS: Non e AB SENT: Voth , Neal The motion carried . Minnick moved: Cole seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority accept Resolut ion #20, Series of 1984, A RESOLUTION OF THE URBAN RENEWAL AU- THORITY ASSERTING THAT THE APPRAIS ED VALUE AS DETERMI NE D BY JOSEPH FARBER AND COMPANY, INC. FOR THE PROPERTY/ LEA SEHOLD INT EREST AT 3378 SOUTH ACOMA STREET, ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 8011 0 IS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF SAID PROPERTY/ LEASEHOLD INTEREST, AND DIRECTING THE AUTHORITY 'S NEGOTIATOR TO USE SAID FAIR MARKET VALUE AS THE BASIS OF NEGOTIATIONS TO AC QUIRE SAID PROPERTY/LEASEHOLD INTEREST BY THE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY. Further, the Authority directs negotiator Scott HcDowell to commence negotiations on the acquisitio n of this leasehold i nterest . AY ES : Cole , Hi nn ick, Novicky, To tton, VanDyke NAYS: None ABSENT: Voth , Neal Th e motio n carried . Totton mov ed : VanDyke seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority accept Resolution #21 , Series of 1984, A RESOLUTION OF TH E URBAN RENEWAL AU- THORITY ASSERTING THAT THE APPRAISED VALUE AS DETER- MINED BY JOSEPH FARBER AND COMPANY, INC . FOR THE PROP- ERTY LEASEHOLD INTEREST AT 33 WEST GIRARD AVENUE, ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80110 IS THE FAIR MARKET VAL UE OF SAID PROPERTY/LEASEHOLD INTER EST, AND DIRECTING THE AUTHORITY'S NEGOTIATOR TO USE SAID FAIR MARKET VALUE AS THE BASIS OF NEGOTIATIONS TO ACQ UI RE SAID PROPERTY /LEASEHOLD INTEREST BY THE URBAN RENEWAL AU- THORITY . Further, the Authority directs negotiator Scott HcDow ell to commence negotiation s on the acquisition of this lease- hold interest. AYES: Cole, Minnick, Novicky, Totton, VanDyke NAYS: None ABSENT: Voth, Neal The motion c rricd . • I • - • • • • • -14- V. SECRETARY'S REPORT . Ms . Powers s tated that an evalua tion on the taxes a nd income generated must be done by an independent CPA to go in with th e bond documen ts. The staff has received a proposal from Laventhol-Horwath t o do this study. It has not been determine d whether this report should be done for the Urban Renewal Authority o r the redeveloper, and who sho uld pay for the report. Ms . Po wers s t ated that it is possible the Authority could end up paying for part of the study, or paying t he full cost of the report. Discussion e nsued. Ms. Powers suggested that the Authorit y might be more comfo rtable au - tho r izin g a contract between this firm and the Authority to do the r e-port. Mi nnic k moved: Cole seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority authoriz e th e staff to negotiate with Brady Corpo r ation to purchase the services of La venthol-Horwath t o make a revenue pro- jection report to be used for the bo nd issue, for th e sum of $9 ,500 or less. AY ES: Cole , Min nick, Novicky , Totton, VanDyke NAY S: No n e ABSENT: Neal , Voth The motion carried . B. 4702 South Washin g ton Street. Ms. Powers stated that the contract with the r eal es tat e b r oker who had the house listed for sale has expired , and she recommended against re- newing the co ntract with this firm. Discussion ensued on the listing of the house with a firm. C. Liability Insurance. Ms . Powers stated that a recommendation will be available at the next regula r meeting on an increase in the liability i nsurance for the Au-thority. The meeting adjourned at 9:35 P. M. • I • - ( ( • I. CALL TO ORDER. • • • URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY May 16, 1984 Spec i a l ~leeting B ' The Special Meeting of the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority was called to order at 5:45 P . M. by Acting Chairman Novicky. Members present: Minnick, Neal, Novicky, Cole Mcintyre, Non-voting Alternate Susan Powers, Executive Director Members absent: Totton, Voth, VanDyke Also present: Economic Development Planner Wm. Richard Hinson Ken Bleakley, Laventhol-Horwath City Manager McCown II. TAX INCREMENT BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE . Ms. Powers introduced Mr. Bleakley of Laventhol-Horwath. Mr. Bleakley will give a report in relation to the Tax Increment Bond Anticipation Note. Ms. Powers stated that everything is pretty close to schedule. Ms. Powers discussed the projected total of the bond issue, and noted that a lot of the figures used for income projections are very conser- vative, and there are other sources of income that are not built into the revenue projections. It is anticipated that the tax increment notes can be supported by the increase from the sales and property tax in the District. Ms. Powers reviewed the financing of three major public improvements, such as Englewood Parkway (Civic Center Boulevard), Little Dry Creek improvements, and the Floyd Avenue realignment. Mr. Minnick asked what provision will be made for the bus station in the 3400 block of South Acoma Street when Girard Avenue will be closed off. Ms. Power s stated that there will still be access from Hampden Avenue. Mr. Minnick discussed the loca tion of a new city hall, pointing out conflic ts that he could envis ion if it was in close proximity to the hotel complex. Mr. Minnick emphasized the need for adequate parking for City Hall wherever the location is determined. Mr. McCown stated that several alternative locations are being considered for City Hall, including making it a part of the civic center complex . Further discussion ensued. Mr. Scott McDowell, Urban Renewal Authority negotiator, entered the meeting at 6:10 P. M. Ms. Powers stated that it is estimated to be four years before an in- c rease in the sales and property tax revenues is realized from the re- development; the bond issue must be large enough to pay the interest on the bonds until such time as the revenues come in . • I • • • • • -2- Mr. Minnick asked who will be paying for plan checking services by out- side agencies. Ms. Powers stated that the City hired an individual wh o does the plan checking for the City, and very few plans are referred out. However, the redeveloper would pay for any plan checking services whether done in-house or by an outside agency. Ms. Powers discussed some of the information which is needed to go with the bond information, including brief biographical histories of all mem- bers of the Authority. Ms. Powers stated that Laventhol and Horwath is the independent CPA firm reviewing the issue, and the r ev e nues projected to retire the bonds. Ms . Powers stated that Mr. Bleakley will make his presentation now. Mr. Bleakley discussed the report that he has prepared, which report pre- sents the projections of revenues to be generated by property, sales, use and lodging taxes in the City of Englewood. In terms of the bond issue, only the property and sales taxes can be used to retire the bonds. The use and lodging taxes could be used by the City Council for other purposes, or could be committed if there was a "short-fall" of revenues needed for bond payment. Mr. Bleakley discussed the procedure they followed to ar- rive at the figures cited in the report. Mr. Bleakley noted that an in- flation factor has been built in on sales tax projections, but no increase has been projected on property tax revenue projections. Mr. Neal asked what effect a decrease in the mill levy would have. Mr. Bleakley stated that a decrease in the mill levy would have an effect on the revenues to be realized to retire the bonds. Mr. Mcintyre asked who made the determination that another liquor store is needed in Englewood, noting the proximity of several other liquor out- lets to the proposed King Soopers site. Mr. Bleakley stated that Laventhol and Horwath does not make the determination on the use, but only the pro- jected revenues that a proposed use may bring in. He stated that he under- stood the liquor store was to be part of the King Soopers complex. The lodging and use tax was discussed. Mr. Bleakley stated that the hotel is projected to open in 1986. Mr. Minnick asked what percent occupancy per night was used in computing the revenues. Mr. Bleakley stated that 60 % occupancy per night was the figure used. He reiterated that the use tax and lodging tax are not revenues pledged to the bond issue. Ms. VanDyke entered the meeting at 6:45 P. M. Mr. McCown emphasized that revenues from the use and lodging taxes could not be used on the bond issue unless so approved by the City Council. Ms. Powers thanked Mr. Bleakley for his attendance. III. ACQUISITION OF PROPERTIES. Minnick moved: Cole seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority go into Executive Session to discuss property acquisition. • • I • • ' ( • • • • -3- AYES: Neal, Novicky, VanDyke, Cole, Minnick NAYS: None ABSENT: Totton, Voth The motion carried. * * * * * Minnick moved: Cole seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority come out of Executive Session. AYES: Novicky, VanDyke, Cole, Minnick, Neal NAYS: None ABSENT: Totton, Voth The motion carried. Minnick moved: Neal seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority direct negotiator Scott McDowell to accept the counter offer of $71,350 as the purchase price of 3456 South Bannock Street. AYES: VanDyke, Cole, Minnick, Neal, No vicky NAYS: None ABSENT: Totton, Voth The motion carried. Neal moved: Minnick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority direct negotiator Scott McDowell to continue negotiations with the other prop- erty owners: Mr. Schmidt, Mr.· Breidenstine, and Mr. Richardson, within the parameters discussed in Executive Session. AYES: VanDyke, Minnick, Cole, Neal, Novicky NAYS: None ABSE NT: Voth, Totton The motion carried . IV. RELOCATION CRITERIA. Mr. Hinson discussed a memorandum to the Authority setting forth additional relocation criteria regarding the matter of telephone installation for busines ses that are being relocated. Mr. Hinson stated that this has been discussed with Legal Counsel Opperman. The reinstallation of tele- phone lines is an eligible relocation expense, and the proposed guidelines will assure that all businesses being relocated are being treated equally. Mr. Minnick stated that he felt the Authority should make clear that this would be for a system comparable to the existing system the business has; there would be no "up-grading" that would be paid for by the Authority. Mr. Novicky discussed concerns that he has with the criteria; he stated that he feels this is one way that the $10,000 limit on relocation benefits • I • • - 0 • • • • • -4- could be exceeded. He asked why telephone s ervice is being specifically set forth. Mr. Hinson pointed out o ther specific items which are designated as being eligible for payment by the Autho rity. Mr. Hinson stat e d that Mr. Opperman has stated that the criteria is n e eded, and that this would assure equal treatment to everyon e ; o therwis e th e Authority co uld be termed arbitrary, capricious , and unfair. The relocation benefits were further discus s ed. Ms. Power s s tated that the intent of the $10,000 figure was a guide line, and that in most cases the $10 ,000 will probably cover relocation c osts; however, there are some businesses that will require in excess of the $10,000 to relocate and they should receive those funds. Mr . Nov icky pointed out that the relocation benefits are not a "right" of anyone, but are a benefit "granted" by the Authority. Mr. Novicky stated that he understood the $10 ,000 was the maximum amount any business could receive in relocation benefits. Discussion ensued . Ms . Va nDyke stated that she agreed with the relocation criteria as proposed, and that this would be another way to assist larger businesses in relocation. Mr. Neal pointed out that it could cost some of the larger businesses $5,000 just to inventory stock in the present location; the actual move and reloca- tion could be in addition to that. Mr. Neal stated that while the Authority cannot pay everyone all they may want in relocation benefits, the Authority can make a good faith effort to recognize special problems and assist the businessman. Mrs. Cole stated that the proposed guidelines only spells out that tele- phone installation is a part of the relocation benefit, and that this would be an eligible expense. Further discussion ensued. Ms. Powers stated that the Authority must con- sider relocation benefits on a case-by-case basis, and still treat all re- locatees fairly. Cole moved: VanDyke seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority adopt the following criteria as an amendment to the Relocation Handbook, making tele- phone installation expenses an eligible relocation ex- pense. 1. The connection or installation of telephone access lines to a relocated business shall be considered an eligible relocation expense by the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority. 2. The number of lines and level, or type, of service provided shall be comparable to the number of lines and level, or type, of service used by the business immediately prior to relocation. AYES: Cole, Minnick, Neal, Novicky, VanDyke NAYS: None ABSENT: Voth, Totton The motion carried • • , I • • • • • • -5- V. RELOCATION REQUESTS. Ms . Po wers discussed a tele phone co nversation she had with a businessman who is moving as a result of the Little Dry Creek improvements; he wants t o take the sign for his business with him; however, the municipality to whic h he is moving will not allow a sign of this size. The businessman feels that the move has made his sign "obsolet e", and he should be reim- bursed for this. Discussion ensued. Mr. Minnick stated that he did not feel this wa s an eligible relocation expen se . He feels that in this instance, the sign is "personal property" because the business owner is taking it with him. Further discussion en- s ued. It was the consensus of the Authority the sign replacement in this case is not an eligible relocation expense. Minnick moved: Va nDyke seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority go into Executive Session to consider a request for Relocation Benefits. AYES: Cole, Minnick, Neal, Novicky, VanDyke NAYS : None ABSENT: Voth, Totton The motion carried. * * * * * Mr. McCown excused himself from the meeting at 8:30 P. M. * * * * * VanDyke moved: Neal seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority come out of Executive Session. AYES: Minnick, Neal, Novicky , VanDyke , Cole NAYS: None ABS ENT: Totton, Voth The motion carried. VanDyke moved: Cole seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority authorize the offer of approxi- mately $44,314 in relocation benefits to Action Answering Service, subject to any variance in actual charges for telephone line installation. AYES: Neal, Novicky, VanDyke, Cole, Minnick NAYS : None ABSENT: Totton, Voth The motion carried . V. NAMING OF "CIV IC CENTER BOULEVARD". Ms. Powers stated that there is a real need to determine a name for the Boulevard; some are calling it "Civic Center Boulevard", while others refer to it as "Englewood Parkway." Discuss ion ensued • • I • • • • • • -6- Novicky moved: Minnick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority defer the honor of naming the Boulevard to City Council. AYES: Novicky, VanDyke, Cole, Minnick, Neal NAYS: None ABSENT: Totton, Voth The motion carried. VI. RESOLUTION ON LEASEHOLD INTERESTS. Ms. Powers stated that a resolution authorizing condemnation proceedings to begin if leasehold interests have not been settled by May 21 has been prepared for consideration of the Authority. This resolution has been ap- proved by Mr. Opperman. Some of the leaseholders may settle with the re- developer, or with the Authority in which event condemnation proceedings would not be instituted against that particular leaseholder. Minnick moved: Neal seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority adopt Resolution #22, 1984, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OR CONDEMNATION OF THE FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN CERTAIN PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD BY ENGLEWOOD URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY IMPLE- MENTING THE ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. AYES: VanDyke, Cole, Minnick, Novicky, Neal NAYS: None ABSENT: Totton, Voth The motion carried. Ms. Powers stated that this resolution will not apply to 3311 South Broadway; this property is being reappraised, and the appraisal has not come in yet. VII. MISCELLANEOUS. Ms. Powers stated that members of the Authority are invited to the dedica- tion of the Little Dry Creek Detention Pond on May 22, at 4:00 P. H. Ms. Powers stated that members of the Authority will be receiving a total packet of documents to be reviewed on the bond issue. The meeting adjourned at 9:25 P. M. • ) I • • ( • • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY 22, 1984 I. CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 P. M. by Chairman McBrayer. Members present: Venard, Allen, Barbre, Becker, Carson, McBrayer, Stoel D. A. Romans, Assistant Director of Community Development Members absent: Magnuson, Tanguma Also present: Senior Planner Susan King II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. May 8, 1984 Chairman McBrayer stated that the Minutes of May 8, 1984, were to be considered for approval. Barbre moved: Stoel seconded: The Minutes of May 8, 1984 be approved as written. AYES: Barbre, McBrayer, Stoel, Venard NAYS: None ABSTAIN: Allen, Becker, Carson ABSENT: Tanguma, Magnuson Chairman McBrayer declared the Minutes stand approved as written. III. FINDINGS OF FACT/WRITTEN AGREEMENT Dartmouth Industrial Park Planned Development Amendment. CASE 1120-84 Chairman McBrayer stated that the Findings of Fact on Case #20-84, the amendment of the Dartmouth Industrial Planned Development, are before the Commission. The staff has also prepared a written agreement as re- quested by the Commission at the last meeting, for the consideration of the Commission. Mr. McBrayer stated that he would like to approve both documents in one motion. Mr. McBrayer noted that there were some members who were absent at the last meeting, but who were in attendance at the time the Public Hearing on the amendment of the Planned Develop- ment was initially opened; if these members of the Commission had read the minutes of the last meeting to acquaint themselves with the action, he was of the opinion that these members were entitled to vote on the Findings of Fact and the written agreement. Mr. Carson asked if the staff is satisfied with the Agreement as written. Mrs. Romans pointed out that this Agreement is to be signed by the City Council, and that the City Council and/or City Attorney may wish to make changes in the Agreement • • I • - ( • • • • • -2- Brief discussion ensued. St oel moved : Venard seconded : The Planning Commission approve the Findings of Fact on Case #2 0-84 and the proposed writt en Agreement be- tween Mr . Paul Welbourne a n d the City of Englewood, and refer both documents to the En glewood City Council . AYES: Barbre, Becker, Carson, McBraye r, Stoel, Venard, Allen NAYS: None ABSENT: Magnuson, Tanguma Th e motion carried. IV. GOALS AND OBJ ECTIVES FOR 1984 V. TOPICS FO R CITY COUNCIL /PLANNING CO~~IISSION MEETING . Mr. McBrayer stated that the dinn er meeting with the Ci t y Council is scheduled for May 31, a nd that one of the items he wants to discuss is the 1984 Goal s /Work Program of the Commission . He sugg ested that each goal should b e reviewed at th is time to determine the status of each. Mr. McBrayer stat ed th at he would like t o show the Counc il all o f the goals the Commission has developed, and that anyone who is "spons oring" a goal should be pre pare d to lead a brief discussion on that goal at the dinner meeting. Goal Il l, (a) "Report on the investigation of a City-wide , residential trash collection by th e City, a nd (b) Investigat e the feasibilit y of the conversion of trash to a useful product", was discussed. Mr. Allen and Mrs. Becker will lead the discussion on this topic. Mr. Allen stated that the scope of this problem is tremendous, and much g reat er than he had ever expected . He stated that it is appearing more and more that the trash collection should be a "metropolitan" project , and not that of an individual jurisdiction. This is particularly true if the intent is to convert the trash to a source of energy. Discussion ensued. Mr. Allen noted that with the projected closing of the Arapah oe County Landfill, he has received notification that costs to Englewood homeowners will increase approximately 20%; he stated that he is of the opinion that this will almost make it mandatory for the City to do something. Mr. Carson stated that he would rather see a study session by the Com- mission on this topic prior to taking it to City Council. Discussion followed. Mr. Stoel stated that he would like to hear what the City Council has to say about the matter of municipal trash collection be- fore the Commission devotes a considerable amount of time to this pro- ject . Mrs. Becker stated that she collected a considerable amo unt of informa- tion at the APA Conference on the matter of trash collection/conversion to energy, and would like to incorporate this information with the other information that has been collected. The consensus is that Mr. Allen and Mrs. Becker will be prepared to dis- cuss progress to this point in time, but point out that the Commission is not prepared to make a full presentation at the dinner meeting on May 31 • • I • • - • • • • • -3- Goal 112, "Encourage and support development of property along Santa Fe and the River, i.e., Riverfront to Windermere. Develop waterway and bikeways along the river" was considered. Mr . McBrayer asked if any progress has been made on this, such as co ntacting the Highway Depart- ment or the Parks and Recreation Department . Mrs. Romans stated that this has not been started, but she would make calls t o schedule meetings. Mr. McBrayer stated that he would like to have a meeting with the Parks and Recreation Department on the agenda in the n ear future. Goal 11 3, "Plan and implement an informal work session r egarding possible uses for the fairground property", was then considered. The Commission has met informally with representatives of Brock Homes , a nd has toured the site. Mr. McBrayer asked Mr. Venard to lead the discussion on this topic at the Commission/Council dinner. Goal /1 4, "Review Swedish Hospital master plans, and any potential im- pact on the adjacent neighborhood" was discussed. There is little that can be presented on this Goal at this time, because the Commission won't be meeting with Swedish until this Fall. Goal 11 5, "Voice support of the construction of a new Ci ty Hall, utilizing historical artifacts as part of the decor", was discussed. Mr. McBrayer stated that the letter has been written to the Mayor and City Counc il. He is of the opinion that the Commission should elicit the opinion of the City Council on this topic. Goal 116, "Perform survey with other communities t o determine the image of the City", was addressed. Mr. Mc Brayer asked if Ms . Powers would be present at the dinner meeting, and if she would want to lead the dis- cussion on this topic. Goal /1 7, "Develop a promotion plan for Englewood utilizing the new bro- chure", was next discussed. Mr. McBrayer asked the status of the brochure. Mrs. Romans stated that she has been given to understand that it is at the printers. Mr. McBrayer suggested a meeting with Mrs. Dalquist on the brochure and requested Mrs. Romans to ask Mrs. Dalquist to call him. Goal /18, "Review the report being generated regarding the City traffic patterns", was discussed. Mr. McBrayer asked if this report has been completed. Mrs. Romans stated that she had discussed the matter with Mr. Plizga, and he still has some concerns. She stated that she will try to get a date when it may be completed. Goal 119 , "Establish Solar Access Ordinance", was considered. Mr. McBrayer stated he would like Mr. Magnuson to lead the discussion on this topic at the Council/Commission dinner. He asked the staff to so notify Mr. Magnuson. Goal 1110, "Initiate study to determine the feasibility and source of funding for the West Oxford Parkway median from Broadway to Santa Fe" was addressed. Mr. McBrayer stated that he would like to combine this with Goal #2, and discuss both at a meeting with Parks and Recreation. He stated that it would be nice to improve this main thoroughfare in the City. Mr. Stoel remarked on the improvement along Santa Fe where the trees are being planted in the medians • • I • • ( • • • • -4- Goal 1111, "Identify areas to annex that would be of benefit to the City. Encourage annexation of the identified areas", was considered. Mrs. Romans stated that she would be glad t o work with whoever will be making the presentation at the dinner meeting. Mr . McBrayer stated that he would work with Mrs. Romans on this. Goal 1112, "H old joint meetings with Commissioners of adjacent c ities. Dev elop and implement educational programs for our commissioners ", was considered. Mr. McBrayer asked if the staff has co ntacted anyone yet . Mrs. Romans stated that the staff has not contacted any municipality; she asked if the Commission wanted to meet with all adjoining commissioners at one time, or with each jurisdiction individually. Mr. McBrayer stated that his thought was to meet individually. Mrs. Romans stated that a number of years ago, Planning Commissions from the adjoining agencies met collectively at various restaurants, and took turns presenting the program for the evening . This seemed to work quite well. Mrs. Becker suggested that this might work into a topic for the Colorado Chapter of the APA to consider, also. Goal 1113, "Compl ete Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance changes and review of Subdivision Regulations" was co nsidered. Mr. McBrayer stated that this is progressing well. Goal 1114, "Finalize agenda suggestions for meeting with City Co un cil" was discussed. Mr. McBrayer stated that this is what the Commission has been discussing; he asked i£ there were other suggestions from Commission mem- bers for the agenda for May 31. Mrs. Becker stated that she felt the "rumors" and unrest that are being circulated regarding the downtown development plan need to be addressed. Mr. Carson stated that there is a meeting this evening of the group ex- pressing opposition to the redevelopment, and that at least two City Councilmen will be in attendance. Mrs. Becker stated that she felt there is a need to talk about the development programs, and the future of down- town Englewood. Discussion ensued . Mr. McBrayer suggested that a transmittal be sent to City Council before the dinner meeting on May 31 with the following items listed for considera- tion and discussion at that time. 1. 1984 Goals/Work Program for the Planning Commission. 2. The status of the Downtown Redevelopment Plan and the resistance being voiced thereto. 3. City Council's Choice. Mr. McBrayer asked if the Commission wanted to discuss the role of the Planning Commission with the City Council; he stated that he was not personally in favor of it. Mrs. Becker stated that she did not feel this was the proper way to address this issue; she suggested that the City Attorney should sit down with the Commission and the role be deter- mined with his counsel. Discussion ensued. Mr. McBrayer asked if the staff wanted time to discuss issues individually at this meeting. Mrs. Romans stated that this is a meeting between the Commission members and City Council members. It would be much better if several of the Planning Commission members participated in the discussion. Mr. McBrayer stated that he would welcome any member who wanted to participate • • I • • r I • • • • -5- VI. PUBLIC FORUM. Ther e wa s no one present to address the Commission. VII. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE. Mrs. Romans stated that the dinner meeting on May 31 is at 6:00 P. M. at the Duffers Restaurant. The staff needs t o know how many members of the Commission will be attending to turn in th e reservations for dinner. Mr . Barbre stated that he would be out of town on that date and could not attend. Mrs. Becker and Messrs. McBrayer, Stoel , Ve na rd, Carson and Allen stated they would attend. The staff will confirm at- tendance with Messrs. Magnuson and Tanguma. Mrs. Romans discussed an inquiry regarding housing for retired persons who hav e income levels which fall between that required for subsidized housing and the rather expensive cooperative housing which will be avail- able in Englewood. A meeting has been scheduled for June 12, at 7:30P.M. in the City Cou ncil Chambers, to bring together persons who are i nteres ted in the possible development of such senior housing, and senior residents who are interested in this type of housing. This will be an informational meeting, and members of the Commission are invited t o attend. Mrs. Romans announced that Harold Stitt, Planner I in the Department of Community Development, and his wife are the proud paren t s o f a baby girl named Kylie Marin, who was born on May 4th. VIII. COMMISSION'S CHOICE . Mr. Allen stated that the City of Englewood Chamber o f Commerce luncheon meeting will be on May 24th; Mr. Brady of the Brady Corporation has been invited to make a presentation on the downtown redevelopment project. Mr. Brady requested that Ms. Susan Powers attend this meeting also. Mrs. Becker discussed her concern with the printed information which is circulating regarding the downtown redevelopment project. Mr. Allen stated that the members of the City of Englewood Chamber of Commerce were presented with answers to the questions posed by the opposition, which answers were prepared by the City Attorney. He stated that this is one reason the invitation was extended to Mr. Brady to address the City of Englewood Ch amber of Commerce. Mrs. Becker stated that she sits on the Colorado Chapter of the APA Executive Board, as a Commissioner Advisor. This board is a very active, hard working board. The annual meeting of this group will be in Grand Junction, and she is planning to attend. There is an "Educational Com- mittee" that she felt would be interested in hearing what topics the Commissioners would like to study; if there are suggestions, please let her know and she will pass this information on . Mrs. Becker discussed the APA National Conference which was held in Minneapolis/St. Paul. She viewed redevelopment which is being done in Stillwater, Minnesota . She also toured Redwing, Minnesota, which is in the process of redevelopment. Mrs. Becker stated she also studied the matter of the trash/incineration system, and was quite impressed • • I • • - • ~ I • • • • -6- She will report more fully on this in her written repo rt. Mrs. Becker stated that Minneapolis was the primary city where the actual convention was held; she discussed the mall which is restricted t o f oot traffic or special buses, with regular vehicular traffic prohibited. Mrs. Becker also discussed the "skywalk", which connects 21 downtown businesses. Mrs . Becker also discussed the "sand barriers" along the highways which reduce the amount of sand coming from the highways; some of these bar- riers are concrete, some are wood, and some are a combination. Mrs. Becker addressed the freeway system in Minneapolis, noting that it is very different from the Colorado freeway system . Mrs . Becker stated that she has the written report nearly completed, and will have some slides to show the Commission in the near futur e . Mr. McBrayer asked if anyone else had anything to discuss. He reminded the Commission of the dinner meeting with City Council on May 31 at 6:00 P. M. The meeting adjourned at 8:00 P . M. • I • • -• • • COUNCIL C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT May 23, 1984 loA Dartmouth Industrial Park Planned Develo pm ent INITIATED BY City Plannin& and Zqnina Cammissign • ACT I ON PROPOSED Receive and review the recommendation of the City Planning and Zoning Commission relative to an amendment to an approved Planned Development. BACKGROUND: An application for an amendment to an approved 1973 Planned Development was filed by Paul Welbourne with the Department of Community Development on March 16, !984. The amendment is necessary because Mr. Welbourne would like to construct an 11,500 square foot industrial building at 3110 South Shoshone Street, which property is located in the Dartmouth Industrial Park Planned Development. The proposed building has not been pre-leased; however, the use will be consistent with the I-2 General Industrial zone classification. In making their determination at a Public Hearing on May 8, 1984, the Commission considered building location, traffic circulation, off-street parking, and landscaping. It was determined that the development is in compliance with the I-2 General Industrial requirements and the intent of the Planned Development regulations. Testimony was received from Mr. Volmers, the architect acting on behalf of Mr. Welbourne. No other persons were present who wished to speak in opposition to or in favor of the request. RECOMMENDATION: The City Planning and Zoning Commission approved the Planned Development amendment subject to limiting the diagonal width of the curb cut at the southwest corner of 3155-99 South Platte River Drive to 60 feet, and installing the landscaping shown on the amended plat prior to issuing the Certificate of Occupancy, and referred the amendment to the City Council for its approval. There are some problems related to the sewer aervice that have been brought to the staff's attention by Stu Fonda, Director of Utilities. They are outlined in more detail in the attached memorandum. • I • • ( ( • • • • CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO IN THE HATTER OF CASE NO. 20-84 ) FINDING OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING TO THE .. ) APPLICATION OF HR. PAUL WELBOURNE ) FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO ) AN APPROVED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ) AS PROVIDED IN 122. 4A, PLANNED ) DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT, OF THE ) COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE ) OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, ) roLORADO. ) A Public Hearing was held on May 8, 1984 in connection with Case No. 20-84 in the City Council Chambers in the Englewood City Hall. The following members were present. Messrs . Barbre, Magnuson, McBrayer, Stoel and Venard. Mrs. Becker, Messrs. Carson, Tanguma and Allen were absent. Upon review of the evidence taken in the form of testimony, presentations, reports and filed documents, the City Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following Findings of Fact: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of the Public Hearing held on May 8, 1984, was given in the Englewood Sent'inel, the official City newspaper, on March 28, 1984. 2. That the property was posted not less than 15 days prior to the Public Hearing. 3. That the application is concerned with a proposed building at 3110 South Shoshone Street located in the Dartmouth Industrial Park. 4 . That the property baa been zoned for General Industrial since its annexation to the City in 1957. s. 6. That the subject site ia part of the Dartaouth Industrial Park Planned Develop.ent, which vas approved in 1973. That Paul Welbourne, owner of the subject site, wishes to de- velop the site with one 11,500 square foot etructure and is propoeing to amend the existing Dart.outb Induetrial Park Planned Developaent in order to do eo • • I • - ( • ( • • • • -2- 7, That the application for approval of the amendment to the existing Dartmouth Industrial Park Planned Development was filed with the Department of Community Development on March 16, 1984. 8. That upon review of the proposed amendment by various City depart- ments, the following comments have been received: Utilities: A Certificate of Occupancy cannot be issued until the back charges for sewer treatment are paid to the City of Englewood. Community Development: The required landscaping must be in- stalled prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 9. That there were no persons who spoke in favor of the proposed development. 10. That there were no persons who spoke in opposition to the proposed development. CONCLUSIONS The City Planning and Zoning Commission concludes: 1. That proper notice of the Public Hearing was given. 2. That no persons other than the representative of the applicant spoke in favor of the proposed development. 3. That no persons spoke in opposition to the proposed development. 4. That evidence relative to the proposed amendment to the approved 1978 Dartmouth Industrial Park Planned Development was entered into the record of the Public Hearing which demonstrates compliance with applicable zoning regulations . RECOMMENDATION Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Planning and Zoning Commission to the City Council that the proposed Planned Development be ap- proved with the following conditions: 1. 2. The landscaping plans ahovn on the original Planned Development dated October 10, 1973, and the a.en&.ent to the landscaping plan dated March 8, 1984, be iaplaaented prior to iaauance of a Certificate of Occupancy. A curb cut .. y be provided on the aoutbweat eornar of the buildiQ& addr .. sed aa 3155 -3199 South Platte River Driva, aa defined by the exiating eaaaaent for the roadway, not to exeeed 60 feet on the diagonal in width • • I • - ( • ( • • • • -3- 3. The terms of the ~tion be reduced to a written aareement, to be prepared by the Planning staff and to be signed by Mr. Paul Welbourne to aive him notice of these conditione prior to is- suance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Upon the vote on a ~tion aade by Mr. Stoel and seconded by Mr. Magnuson: Those voting in favor were Mr. Stoel, Mr. Venard, Mr. Barbre, Mr. Magnuson and Mr. McBrayer. No one voted in opposition to the motion. Mr. Tanguma, Mr. Allen, Mrs. Becker and Mr. Carson were absent. By Order of the City Planning and Zoning Co-ission. • I • - • ( • STAFF REPORT PAGE -1- STAFF REPORT RE: • • • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT CASE 120-84 Request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Development, DATE TO BE CONSIDERED: May 8, 1984 APPLICANT AND OWNER: Paul Welbourne 420 East 58th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80216 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Dartmouth Industrial Park. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS: The applicant's architect has met with the staff and provided ad- ditional landscape information. The approved Planned Development pro- vided for approximately 71,000 square feet of landscaping. This is approximately 3.7% of the total aite area. At the present time, ap- proximately 25,000 square feet of landscaping is in place. The pro- posed Planned Development amendment indicatea approximately 167,000 square feet of landscaping, or 8.6% of the total site area. Of the 167,000 square feet of landscaping, 15% will be in living plant material. The Planned Development amendment proposes to double the amount of land- scape over the original Planned Development, and increase the living plant material area by 5,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing to use only rock landscape material along the railroad spur due to the maintenance problem associated with plants in an active rail area. Total Landscaping Area Existing Landscape Area Living Plant Material Original P.D. 71,000 aq. ft. 25,000 aq. ft. 25,000 aq. ft. • Amended P.D. 167,000 aq. ft. 30,000 sq. ft. I • • c ( ( • STAFF REPORT Page -1- STAFF REPORT RE: • • • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT CASE 120-84 Request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Development. DATE TO BE CONSIDERED : April 17, 1984 APPLICANT AND OWt-."ER: Paul 'Welbourne 420 East 58th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80216 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: Dartmouth Industrial Park. The proposed building is to be addressed 3110 South Shoshone Street. ISSUE TO BE CONSIDERED: The City Planning and Zoning Commission is to consider the layout of the proposed amendment to the Development Plan of the Dartmouth In- dustrial Park. The Commission will consider the location and relation- ship of the existing buildings to the proposed building, landscaping, drainage, off-street parking, off-street loading, lighting, points of access, open space, flood plain, and availability of utilities. ACTION TO BE TAKEN: A developer proposing to amend an approved Planned Development must submit such amendment to the Planning Commission. The proposed amendment must be considered by the Planning Commission at a public hearing, fol- lowing which hearing the Planning Commission may approve, conditionally approve, or refer the proposed amendment back to the applicant for cor- rections. If the proposed aaendaent ia approved or conditionally ap- proved, it is referred to the City Council for final action. The City Council .. y accept the recommendation of the Planning Commiaaion and approve the aaended Planned Development, or, if the Council ia of the opinion that additional inforaation ia neceaaary, a public hearing on the propoaed aaendment aay be held by the Council. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached Plan. • I • • - ( ( • ( STAFF REPORT Page -2- ZONE DISTRICT: I-2, General Industrial District. ANNEXATION DATA: • • • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT CASE 1120-84 This area was annexed by Ordinance 23 of 1957. DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject site is known as the Dartmouth Industrial Park and is located in the 1400-1600 blocks of West Dartmouth Avenue. The site is bounded by South Platte River Drive on the east, West Dartmouth Avenue which is the Englewood/Denver boundary on the north, South Shoshone Street on the west, and the Englewood/Sheridan boundary on the south at approxi- mately West Floyd Avenue extended. The area to the east is zoned I-1, Light Industrial, and the area to the west is zoned I-2, General Industrial. BACKGROUND: The subject property was annexed by Ordinance 23 of 1957, and a zone classification of H-2, Industrial, was placed on it. This classification was amended to 1-2, General Industrial, by Ordinance 26 of 1963. In 1974, a Planned Development was approved for the subject site. Since that time the three buildings fronting on West Dartmouth Avenue have been sold to individual owners. Hr. Paul Welbourne, owner of the balance of the site, has proposed to construct an additional building on the site, which would be located in the northwest corner of the site. The Public Service Company easement running through the northwest corner of the site has been pur- chased by Hr. Welbourne who has granted Public Service Company an easement for the existing utility lines. COMMENTS FROM OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS AND PUBLIC AGENCIES: Building and Safety: No problem with the proposed development. Engineering Services: No major problems with this proposal. Public Works: No objections • Utilities: A Certificate of Occupancy can not be issued until the back charges for sewer treatment are paid to the City of Englewood. Staff Note: This aatter is being resolved by the Utilities Departaant, and should not be at issue in the case before the Commission. Public Service Company: No coament received. • • I • • ( STAFF REPORT Page -3- .. Mountain Bell: No comment received. • • • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT CASE #20-84 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS: The applicant is proposing to amend the existing Dartmouth Industrial Park Planned Development to add one additional structure of approximately 11,500 square feet. The site has adequate parking and off-street loading. The original Planned Development required landscaping, of which only a portion bas been planted and which will have to be extended to the new building site. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATION: The Department of Community Development recommends that the amend- ment of the Dartmouth Industrial Park Planned Development be approved with the following condition: 1. The required landscaping be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. ( 0 • • I • • - ( r • • • .. • AGREEMENT between MR. PAUL WELBOURNE on behalf of WELBOURNE INVESTMENT CO. and the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD This Agreement, made and executed this-----day of----- 1984, by and between Paul Welbourne on behalf of Welbourne Investment Co., hereinafter called property owner, and the City Council of Englewood, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado, hereinafter called City. WHEREAS, Mr. Paul Welbourne has requested the City Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of Englewood, Colorado, to amend the Dartmouth Industrial Park Planned Development, which was·· approv.cd on July 2, 1973, being the area indicated on the plat accompanying this Agreement, and being property now vested of record in the aforementioned property owner; and WHEREAS, it is believed that the amendment of said Dartmouth In- dustrial Park Planned Development to permit an additional industrial building containing 11,532 square feet ef floor area and which will be identified as 3110 South Shoshone Street, will be in the interest, wel- fare and convenience of the people of Englewood, Colorado, and will in- clude a.ang other things, that: a. The t.prov .. ent of landscaping as shown on the .. ended land- scaping plan dated March B, 1984 will be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancyi and • I • • ( • • • • -2- b. That the curb cut on the aouthwest corner of the building ad- dressed as 3155-3199 South Platte River Drive, as defined by the existing easement for the roadway, will not exceed 60 feet on the diagonal in width; and WHEREAS, the aforementioned owners of the property for which the Planned Development has been approved have agreed to develop the afore- mentioned property as an individual warehouse in consideration of the City's requirement that the property owner install landscaping and main- tain the landscaping as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH, that the City Council of Englewood, Colorado approves the amendment to the Dartmouth Industrial Park Planned Development recorded at Book ----------• Page --------- and for mutual benefits to each of the parties hereto, the property owner and their respective successors and assigns do hereby covenant and agree: 1. That landscaping as shown on the landscape plans incorporated in the original Planned Development dated October 10, 1973, and the amendment to the landscaping plan dated March 8, 1984 ahall be installed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building to be identified by street address as 3110 South Shoshone Street, Englewood, Colorado. 2. That a curb cut will be provided on the aouthwest corner of the building addreasad aa 3155-3199 South Platte River Drive, as defined by the u:btin& aaa•ent for the roadway which ahall not exceed 60 feat on the diaaonal in width. 3. That the property owner will lay ·out, devalop and -intain the aforaaantionad property only in the ~•r approved on the .. andad Dartaouth lnduatrial Park Planned Devalopaent dated ------- • I • • • • • • -3- Further, the City and property owners understand and agree: 1. That the property owner shall comply with all applicable rules, regulations, ordinances and laws of the City of En&lawood, Colorado. 2. That the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and enforceable against the said property owner, his successors and assigns, and all subsequent owners, their respective heirs, auccessors, and assigns, of the property herein described, 3. That an executed copy of this Agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Arapahoe County, Colorado, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement have caused these presents to be executed the day and year aforesaid, WELBOURNE INVESTMENT CO. by: WITNESS: Paul Welbourne -------------------------------Title CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO by: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk • I • • • • • • ORDINNCE oo.// SERIES CF 1984 • • - BY AIJI'HORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 19.2 INTRODUCED BY CXlUOC IL HFMBER BRAOOHAW AN ORDINAN:E PROVIDitl; FOR 'mE IICREASE CF 'mE HOTEL,ncrEL ROa1 TAX BY AHEH>Itl; TITLE XIII, <liAPI'ER 4, SEx::TIONS 2 AND 3, CF 'mE !Kil.9i000 Mt.IIICIPAL COOE '69, AS AHDIDED. WHEREAS, it is necessary for the amount of tax imposed for the rental or lease of hotel/motel roans to be increased to conform to present economic factors; tO<J, THEREFORE, BE IT ORD!UNED BY 'mE CITY COUNCIL CF 'mE CITY OF EI'(;LEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. That a new Subsection (c) be added to 13-4-2, EMC '69, as ameJi3ed, to read as follows: 13-4-2 (C) UPON 'mE RENTAL FEE, PRICE, OR O'ffiER CONSIDERATION PAID OR REX::EIVED FOR 'mE RENTAL OR LEASE CF ANY RO<l1, RO<l15, OR POHLE tOlE FOR LOOGitl; PURPOSES IN ANY ESTABLISHMENl' MAKitl; StDi AVAILABLE TO 'mE PUBLIC • Section 2. That &lbsection (b) of Section 13-4-3, EMC '69, as amended, is illlel1ded to read as follows: 13-4-3: SALES TAX LEVY itt .w•~HR M ~ ._ ~ ~ IN&seed-fi* N!M&f, ~ ... title ~ ~ • ......., ...... wp8fl HMiH: ~ p8ee H -~ 88R&MHM~ pilM H 11888l'<'llli ~JJef&JJp llp8R ~ ~ H ~ H Mty Hally MalliS 11188Ue h4Mte& HI! H~J~J•R! ~N~Jpe&es HI MlY W-y IIIMEN:-y HIJI)e-y H&eJJ~.,. "*..,. IJM!Iifl! ~..-~MR.~ ~ esuW:isAIIIeRty Malt~ IMieA MalliS ;wti~ H ~ pYliH:M.,. lliheEe ~ peHeil H ~~ Mt; whi-eR 1MieA HMa* He.,. P*Me H e4thH eeMil!ieJJ~ K paM w MetiYeli &MU lie *e8& 4iAaR ~~~~y ~~ My&.. !Ate U. heHity ~ &MU lie ..._ IIP8fl ~ 11aRe ll8halilile H M 11M MI!*A ~ Qllae_.._ fi* heMH aRII ~ peii&&Rr pilii4MHMp. 881Jp&llilld-H MRH ~·4y lllillk~ eweR ~JeaN iiiYilliHliH:e Mill*~ feJJ ill* P'illpe&a& ei ~e Qwlp&eJJ, lie -..-H lie a "JJeMU.eJJ!!. ill& -fiMI!i HI ilee~i ~.....t-l: .. \ 1 I . • - • • (b) 'ftU: P'OlLOWit«; TAXES ARE HEREBY LEVIED UPON 'DIE RDfi'AL PEE , • PRICE, OR OTHER CDISIDERATION PAID OR RI!X:EIVID , tJION 'DIE IIIII'I'AL OR LEASE CP ANY RXI1, RXJoiS OR KBILE toas Pal LODCIIIO PURPOSES IN ANY HOTEL, MOrEL, WDGE, RI:90RT, cum , IOO'IIIC IUJSE, APAR'1t1Dn' BUIIDit«; OR 0'1'tiER ISTABLI SHVJrr , IIUaiiO stDt RXItS AVAILABLE 'ro THE PUBLIC, MIDE 'DIE PERIOD CP LCIDGit«; FOR WHICH stX:H RDfi'AL PEE, fRICE OR [ O'ftii:R CDISIDERATION IS PAID OR R!X:EIVID SHALL BE LISS 'ftiAH THIRTY (30) DUS. 'ntOSE TAXES HERmY L!VIR> ARE: (1) 'DIE SALES TAX SET !'OR'nf IN THE PRI!CEDit«; ~ (a) HERPXF LEVIED IN ACCORDt\H:E WITH 'DIE 9::HIDULE AS IS SET FCRTH 'mEREIN. (2) '1WO PEia:Nr (2') CP THE CXlST CP THE RDfi'AL FEE, PRICE, OR 0'1'tiER CDISIDERATION PAID OR RB:EIVID FOR 'DIE LOOOit«; ON EAQt l!'lLL llOLLAR CF SAID RDfi'AL FEE. 'DIE PERSON, PIUmmRSHIP, CX>RPORATION, OR OTHER ENTITY 19.Klt«; stX:H RXJoiS AVAILABLE SHALL, FOR AU. PURPOSES CP THIS CHAPI'ER, BE D!llm> TO BE A "RETAILER" AS DEFINED IN S!X:TION 13-4-7. Introduced, read in full, and passed on 4th day of June, 1984 • first reading on the • Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 6th day of June, 1984. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 18th day of June, 1984. Published by title as "<kdinanoe to. the 20th day of June, 1984. , Series of 1984, on Attest: 11lgene L. 0t1s , Mayor ex o fficio City Clerk-Treasurer [ • I • • f 2 • - - • (' • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of l!bglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and oanplete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1984. --- Gary R. H1gbee 3 ~~~~-·----------------~~----~~~-·--~------------~~~-•[1 I • • • ORDINAN:E ood' / SERIFS CF 1984 .. • • • BY AlJI'HORITY COUNCIL BILL 00. 19.2 IN'l'ROOOCID BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW AN ORDINA!CE PROVIDI~ FOR 'lliE !!CREASE CF 'lliE HOTEL/MJI'EL ROCJot TAX BY AMDIDI~ TITLE XIII, OiAPI'ER 4, SEX::TIONS 2 AND 3, CF 'lliE !H;L~OOO MUNICIPAL CODE '69, AS AHFliDED. WHEREAS, it is necessary for the amount of tax imposed for the rental or lease of hotel/motel roans to be increased to confoDn to present economic factors; NCM, THEREFORE, BE IT ~INED BY 'lliE CITY COUNCIL CF 'lliE CITY OF ~~. COLORADO: Section 1. 'lhat a new Subsection (c) be added to 13-4-2, EM: '69, as ililended, to read as follows: 13-4-2 (c) UPON 'lliE REm'AL FEE, PRICE, OR <miER CONSIDERATION PAID OR IID:EIVED FOR 'lliE REm'AL OR LEASE CF ANY ROCJot, RX»15, OR I'UHLE HCJolE FOR LODGitl:i PURFOSFS IN ANY ESTABLI~ MAKI~ SOCH AVAILABLE TO 'lliE PUBLIC. Section 2. 'lhat &lbsection (b) of Section 13-4-3, EM: '69, as il'ileiided, is ll!lended to read as follows: 13-4-3: SALES TAX LEVY ~ IIIW-i-~ H ~ Ytf le¥teli 8¥ IMIINee~ -fi* heHei 1 ~ -ie tiae ~ ~ • ...._, MM1i YP8R lleMal ~ ~Me H MRH 88MMel'e,ieR pit._ H l'asai..,al ~niei'F 11f18R ~ HMal H Mta&e ei My ~ Mllll& -w.*e heRes fel' lllli!iRIJ Jl'll'p&MII -i-R My RMtiy ~ ~ .--.t!y fi~ 1'81111lRIJ hewae., ·H·eR-INHe*RfJ MAe!' eMaWiliiHIIeR-, ~ IIW8A HaN -..~ " ~ pwW-iey whel'e ~ peHed ei l81111J iRIJ HI' •.teA 11W8A l!'eMa* ~~Me M MAe!' 811n&i.lllal'e,i8R H pit._ H l'e&fi.Yflll IIMU 8a lellll ~ ~~ ~ Myth 1M u• ~ HY4elli IIMU 8a IMIMlli ypeR --11-.e ae'Reiltia H -ie ee4! HI'~ -i-R QM~a&Mi• -fi* hHeH Mill ~ p&l'&eR, pitl'~i-py eel'p&l'eU8R H MMI' &MMy -~*RIJ 11W8A IHMiiiiB MIH~ IIAilll-y fel' •U Plil'peaaa ei ~~~ Qwap&al', M llla8ll8li W 8a e ~le§l1 H IIIM*Mii -i-R &ee"- ~~l~ \ 1 • I • • • • I I t I .I I • • • (b) THE FOLLaolir«; TAXES ARE HEREBY LEVIID UPON THE Rml'AL PEE, PRICE, OR O'niER CONSIDERATION PAID OR R!X:EIVID 1 UPON THE REm'AL OR LEASE <F AN! RXJ1, RX1tS OR f«.BILE 104ES rat LCIDGIN:; PURPOSES IN AN! ll>'lU. I K1nL I UlDGE I RESORT I a.ua I RXJ1It«; HOUSE, APAR'lM!Nr BUIIDIN:i OR OTHER ESTABLISII1mr, MP.Iar«; StX:H RXItS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC, WHERE THE PERIOD <F LOOGIN:i FOR WHIQf StX:H Rml'AL PEE, PRICE OR OTHER CONSIDERATION IS PAID OR R!X:EIVID SHAU. BE LESS 'mAN 'nfiRTY (30) ~YS. 'DfOSE TAXES HEREBY LEVIBD ARE: (1) THE SALES TAX SET J!'OR'Df IN THE PR!X:IDIN:; PAIWW.PH (a) HERECJ! LEVIID IN Aa:ORD.\lCE WITH THE lDIIDULE AS IS SET FORTH 'DIEREIN. (2} '1WO PER::Dlr (2\) <F THE ClJST <F THE Rml'AL PEE, PRICE, OR O'niER CONSIDERATION PAID OR Rl!a:IVID FOR THE LOOGIN:i ON EAQf l"tLL DOLLAR <F SAID Rml'AL PEE. THE PERSON, ~IP, <X>RPORATION, OR OTHER Ufl'ITY M!Uat«; StX:H RXJ1S AVAILABLE SHAU., FOR AIL PURPOSI!'S <F 'nilS OiAPI'ER, BE DEI!M!D TO BE A "RETAILER" AS DEFINID IN Sf£'~' ION 13-4-7. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 4th day of .1\me, 1984. 1984. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 6th day of June, Read by title and passed on final reading on the 18th day of June, 1984. Published by title as -<kdinance No. ___ , Series of 1984, on the 20th day of .1\me, 1984. Attest: &Jgene L. 0t1s, Mayor ex officio city Clerk-Treasurer 2 f { I . • - ! I I I I I . t I I I I I I • i • • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Inglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and CCIIIplete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1984. --- Gary R. H1gbee 3 I • • • • • • 7 8 I <R>INAta NO. J,:). SERIES CF 1984 BY At11'HORITY COUlCIL BILL NO. 20 Im'ROIXX:m BY ClXJN:IL MEMBER BILO FOR AN ORDINAta APPROVIt«; TRANSIT STREET IHPROVEMENr AGU:FMf.Nr Wl'nf REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISl'RICT. WHEREAs, the City of Englewood has received fran the Regional Transportation District an agreement for transit related street improvanents; and WHEREAs, these City desires to enter into an agreement to accanplish the improvanents; NOW, 'DfEREFoRE, BE IT ORD.\INID BY THE CITY CXXJlCIL CF THE CITY CF EN:;[.~, CX>LORAOO I AS FOLLCJiS: Section l. An Agreement titled "Regional Transportation District Trans1t Street Improvanent Agreement," attached hereto marked Exhibit A and incorporated herein, is hereby approved by the City Co~meil of the City of Englewood, Colorado. Section 2. Said Agreement generally provides for concrete repair at the following locations: 1) W. Di!lrbnouth Ave. at s. Fox Street, 8fl corner 2) w. Flo}'d Ave. at s. Fox Street, * corner 3) s. Broadway at W. ()lincy Ave., 8fl corner 4) S. Broadway at w. Stanford Ave., 8fl corner. Section 3. 'ftle Mayor of the City of Englewood is authorized to sign and the City Clerk is authorized to attest the Agreement. Introduced, read in full, and paSSed on first reading on the 4th day of June, 1984. 1984. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 6th day of June, Aaad by title and paSSed on final reading on the 18th day of June, 1984. • I • • • • • • ·-·-------- •• -··------------4 ---- Published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1984, on the 20th day of June, 1984. --- Attest: &Jgene L. 0t1s, Mayor ex officio city Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of lbjlewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and caoplete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1984. --- Gary R. Hig'tJee r I . - ( • • • ,. • REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT TRANSIT STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 1984, by and betw~ the City of Englewood;'tiereinafter referred to as "Grantee," and the REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "RTD." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the RTD has established a Transit Street Improvement fund for the purpose of implementing transit related street improvements; and WHEREAS, the Grantee has filed an application for funding of certain improvements and the Board of Directors of the RTD has approved the use of RTD local funds for the Project{s) described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to implement capital improvements described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: SECTION ONE PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to assist the Grantee in implementing the transit related street improvement(s) described below (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "the Project"). The Grantee, in turn, will carry out the Project in acoordance with the terms of this Agreement. SECTION TWO THE PROJECT The Project consists of the design and construction of one (1) reconstruct radius, two (2) reconstructions of curb gutter and sidewalk and one ( 1) reconstruc- tion of radius with an accompanying drainage improvement as described in Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION THREE THE GRANT The RTD will provide the Grantee the total cost of the project or TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND EIGHTY EIGHT AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($2,,488.00) whichever is less. -1- • I • - (' • • • • • • --·--·"-.. ---- a. Where the Grantee performs the Project work through its own work force, the RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of invoices received and approved by the RTD for equipment, labor, and materials expended. b. Where the Grantee performs the Project work through a con- tractor, the RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of the contract award price (as may be modified by change orders) all approved by the RTD. c. Where the Project work is part of a larger capital improvement, the RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of the unit prices bid as part of such larger contract and RTD approval of all costs including items which may not be identified in the larger contract. SECTION FOUR ELIGIBLE COSTS Costs eligible for reimbursement by the RTD under this grant Agreement are limited to the actual cost of the acquisition of real property and construction of the approved Project. SECTION FIVE GRANTEE REQUIREMENTS a. The Grantee will prepare any necessary right-of-way or other real property acquisition instruments for the Project, if any. b. The Grantee will provide design document review, construction inspec- tion, and engineering services for the Project. c. The Grantee will obtain any required appraisals, permits, and approvals and will be responsible for all citizen review and public agency coordination, if any. d. The Grantee will maintain the completed Project. e. The Grantee will construct the Project through its own work force or cause it to be constructed through formally advertised, free, open, and competitive bidding, and in accordance with such additional terms and conditions as the RTD may require • f. The Grantee shall permit and shall require its contractors to permit the RTD to inspect all data and records with regard to the Project. The RTD also may require the Grantee to furnish at any time prior to closeout of the Project, audit reports prepared according to generally accepted accounting principles. g. To the extent the work to be performed under this Agreement is performed by other than the employees of the Grantee or other Governmental entity and the total cost of such work is in excess of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($.5,000.00) the Project Labor Agreement incorporated herein by reference shall apply. -2- • I • • - • • • • • • h. Reimbursement by RTD for eligible costs is expressly contingent upon completion of the work to be performed under this Agreement on or before November 30, 1984. Grantee shall obtain the RTD's final inspection and written concurrence in the acceptance of the completed project improvement on or before December 1.5, 1984. SECTION SIX DESIGN APPROVAL The Grantee shall obtain the RTD's written approval of any street improve- ment plans prior to receiving construction bids. As part of this approval process, the RTD shall have the right to inspect any contract documents. SECTION SEVEN CONTINUING TRANSPORTATION USE In consideration for this Grant, the Grantee shall permit the RTD free use of the improvements funded hereunder for transportation purposes for a period of not less than five (.5) years from the date said improvements are completed and made available for public use. In the event the Grantee interrupts, eliminates, or interferes with the RTD's use of said improvements, the Grantee shall immediately refund to the RTD the full amount of the Grant funds received hereunder, pro- rated over the five-year period. SECTION EIGHT FINAL INSPECTION The Grantee shall obtain the RTD's final inspection and written concurrence in the acceptance of completed Project improvements. The RTD, upon granting final acceptance, and receipt of Invoices acceptable to and approved by RTD will within thirty (30) days thereafter, make payment in the amounts specified In Section Three above, in conformance with the conditions stated therein. SECTION NINE HOLD HARMLESS -RTD NOT LIABLE Grantee, agrees to save and hold the RTD harmless from and against all suits, claims, and demands based upon any alleged damage to property or any alleged Injury to persons (including death) which may occur or be alleged to have occurred by or on account of any negligent act or omission on the part of the said Grantee, its subcontractors, or any of their servants, employees, or agents. The Grantee, at its own expense, will settle or defend any c laims or litigation arising out of the performance of this Agreement. The RTD shall not be liable for any damage to the Project improvements through the routine use thereof unless caused solely by the negligence and/or omission of RTD employees. -3- I • • \ • • • • SECTION TEN TERMINATION Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by g1vmg written notice specifying the date of termination, such notice to be given not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date therein specified. In the event the Grantee desires to cancel this Agreement after RTD has expended funds for design, but before construction has begun, Grantee shall reimburse the RTD for all design funds expended by RTD. In the event the Grantee desires to cancel this Agreement after Project construction during the initial five (5) year period, it may do so upon giving written notice to the RTD, specifying the date of termination, such notice to be given not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date therein specified. As a condition precedent to termination after Project construction, the Grantee shall reimburse the RTD for all Grant funds received under this Agreement, pro-rated over said five-year period. SECTION ELEVEN PROHIBITED INTERESTS No officer, member, or employee of the RTD, and no members of its governing body, and no other public official or employee of the governing body of the locality or localities included within the District, during his or her tenure or for one year therafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, or the proceeds thereof. SECTION TWELVE MISCELLANEOUS I. ~· Any notice to be given hereunder shall be deemed given when sent by registered or certified mail to the addresses below: RTD Department of Legal Counsel 1600 Blake Street Denver, CO 80202 Grantee: The City of Englewood 3400 S. Elati Street Englewood, CO 80110 2. Severabilit'i· Should any provision of this agreement be declared invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect regardless of such declaration. 3. Equal Emplo'iment Opportunit'i· In connection with the performance of this Agreement, the Grantee shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status, being handicapped, a disadvantaged person, or a disabled or Viet Nam era veteran. The Grantee shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status, being handicapped, a disadvantaged person, or a disabled or Viet Nam era veteran. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: -4- • I • • - (\ • • • • • • employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment adver- tising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 4. Agreement Binding. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto • .5. Laws to Apply. The Project shall be carried out in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and all applicable Federal laws & regulations, and all local laws, ordinances and regulations. 6. Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended except in writing by mutual agreement of the parties, nor may rights be waived except by an instrument in writing signed by the party charged with such waiver. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement, effective the day and date first above written. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM FOR THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT By Legal Counsel ATTEST: By REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT By General Manager GRANTEE: The City of Englewood By Title----------------- _,_ • I • • • • • EXHIBIT A City of Englewood 1984 Transit Street Improvement Projects Location Project RTD Funds Dartmouth Avenue at Fox St., southwest corner intersection Reconstruct Radius s 3,468 Floyd Ave. at Fox St., northwest Relocate traffic signal, corner and Floyd Ave. west of reconstruct radius, Fox St. remove crosspan, 14,177 construct catch basin, 18" RCP, curb, gutter, and sidewalk South Broadway Avenue at Reconstruct curb, .5,.526 Quincy Avenue, southbound gutter, and sidewalk (\ South Broadway Avenue at Reconstruct curb, 2 1 317 Stanford Avenue, southbound 'utter, and sidewalk OTAL s 2.5,488 I • • • • - • • \ ' .,,." Balt ic lliH ~ We !;ley Bo ktr I . . • • • • • 0 SW Corner Dartmouth & Fox REMOVE VC&G 41.3 LF CONSTRUCT 8" VC&G 5.0 LF REMOVE CURBWAU< 41.7 LF CONSTRUCT CW I 5.0 LF REMOVE WALK 105 SF ASPHALT PATCH 8TOHS CONSTRUCT 8··'1./C&G 87 LF BAfiECCUt&E 15 TONS CONSTRUCT 4" WALK :; 243 SF SOD WORK LS s. Fox St. E&adlle 17· Ft. R8dlua 40' Radlua at Lip EN&INEERING DEPARTMfNT ' CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO RECONSTRUCTION for R. T.D. Drawn BJ : JDL Date : Jon , 1914 ( ·-· • - • • I • ... U) >< 0 LL • U) I 1----~-- ! 34.8' I r __.-·· MATCH LINE • • • / ~/~7 I • ( . I / / 0 / i t ! I I ' I I I w. Floyd : 'Ave . ( westbound ) 2 • - MATCH LJNe REMOVE vco&G 23.0 LF ....,. QIWI M.K 11ULF ...,_CMIPXS 330 IF COII8DUCT r vc:&G 23.0 LF ~CWI H.1 LF . co.T r VCAG wl 4• WALK MONO 11.1 LF co.T r vco&G w/ 4• WALK MONO 158.7 LF ca.n..cT 4• WALK 62 8F &AW 12.8 LF co.T CATQt U.. w/ r VC&G -1r ll.CI. eo LF MMDV£ ASI'HAL T 1ee IF AUIW. T PATQt 18 TONS UIICO'IRIE 24 TOH8 80D a ..... IICUR WORI( La -REMOVE a REaET 8IGNAL POU La { • • • • 0 See SMel2 Grass ; ! I I I I I I i I I i I 2a \--,------------~Ali --.-:---:::::_ ( W. Floyd Ave . ( eastbound ) -----------------------~---- -------------. ----------------- ===· -------------- ~, . .....,...,. CITY OF EN6LEI'OOD, ctiLDIIADD RECONSTRUCTION for R. T.D. n Drawn Br : 1.8 . Dele : )' • 1914 • • - • CD > c( • • • q ~ ... () c -:::l 0 • • ~ • • • • 0 SW Corner Quincy & Broadway 4 8.0' ... \ R.TASign •• ChaM 8ec:tiDn REMOVE Vc::&G 1HJI Lf REMOIIE WAU< 161 IF REMOVE CROSSPAN 821F CONSTRUCT e• VC&G 12 Lf CONSTRUCT e• VC&G 22 Lf COHST e• VC&G w/ 6' PAN ML.f CONSTRUCT e• CR088PAN 31 8F N • h \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~ CONSTRUCT r CAOSIPMI CONSTRUCT 4• WAU< REPAIR CHASE SECTION SAW REMOVE ASPHALT ASPHALT PATCH BA&ECOIIASE ' a1 IF 161 IF LS 10Lf 32611' UTONS 7ATON8 EIIIINEDIN5 DENRTIENT CITY OF EN6LEWOOD, COI.DRADO RECONSTRUCTION for R.T.D. Drawn By : JDL Date . )... , 1984 • • - • • 0 SW corner Stantord a l::iroadway ' S. BROADWAY vcaG • w > < c 0: REMOVE VC&O tell' 0 CON8TAUCT tf' VC&G 101.1' u. CONSTRUCT tf' VC&G w/ I , PAN MIJ' z REMOVE AIPHALT • 2241F ~ A&PtW..T PATCH I TON (JJ • ~ ENGINEERWG DENin'MEIIT CITY OF£~ COLORADO • RECONSTRUCTION for R.T.D DrChlft By : DLH Date : Jon, 1984 ' • • - - • • • I ' ' I I ' • I ' I • • • • CIIDINAtCE NO. ~ SERIES CF 1984 BY Al1I'HORITY CXlJtCIL BIU.. NO. 20 IN'l'R()[)(X:ID BY CXJUN::: IL MEMBER BILO FOR AN ORDINA!CE AI'ProVIt«; TRANSIT STREET IHPROVEMmr ~ WITH RFX>IONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT. WHEREAs, the City of f.hglewood has received fran the Regional Transportation District an agreement for transit related street improvements; and WHEREAs, these City desires to enter into an agreement to accanplish the improvanents; ~. 'l'HEREFORE, BE IT ORD.\INED BY THE CITY <XXJlCIL CF THE CITY CF ~. CDLORAoo, AS F'OLLCMs: Section 1. An Agreement titled "Regional Transportation District Trans1t Street Improvement Agreement," attached hereto marked Exhibit A and incorporated herein, is hereby approved by the City Co~meil of the City of f.hgleii«XXd, Colorado. Section 2. Said Agreement generally provides for concrete repair at the following locations: 1) W. Dartmouth Ave. at s. Fox Street, 8l'i corner 2) w. Floyd Ave. at s. Fox Street, * corner 3) s. Broadway at W. ()Jincy Ave., 8l'i corner 4) s. Broadway at W. Stanford Ave., 8l'i corner. Section 3. '1be 11ayor of the City of l!'hgleii«XXd is authorized to sign and the City Clerk is authorized to attest the .llgreement. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 4th day of .June, 1984. 1984 • .June, Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 6th day of .June, Aaad by title and passed on final reading on the 18th day of 1984 • • I • • • • • • • • ---·------.. -----·-·· Publiahed by title as Ordinance No •. ___ , Series of 1984, on the 20th day of June, 1984. Attest: EUgene L. 0t1s, Mayor ex off1c1o City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of l!hglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and f?'blished by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1984. --- Gary R. Higbee • r I • • - • • • • • REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT TRANSIT STREET IMPROVEMENT AGR~EMENT DLJIUCAll ORIGINAL I cl. !! AGREEMENT made this __ day of , 1984, by and between the City of Englewood, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee," and the REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "RTD." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the RTD has established a Transit Street Improvement fund for the purpose of implementing transit related street improvements; and WHEREAS, the Grantee has filed an application for funding of certain improvements and the Board of Directors of the RTD has approved the use of RTD local funds for the Project(s) described in Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to implement capital improvements described herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency f of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: • SECTION ONE PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to assist the Grantee in implementing the transit related street improvement(s) described below (hereinafter sometimes referred to as "the Project"). The Grantee, in turn, will carry out the Project in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. SECTION TWO THE PROJECT The Project consists of the design and construction of one (I) reconstruct radius, two (2) reconstructions of curb gutter and sidewalk and one (I) reconstruc- tion of radius with an accompanying drainage improvement as described in Exhibit A attached hereto. SECTION THREE THE GRANT The RTD will provide the Grantee the total cost of the project or TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND EIGHTY EIGHT AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($2,,488.00) whichever is less. -1 - • I • • ' • • • • ---....-·~-__ .. .__ f • a. Where the Grantee performs the Project work through its own work force, the RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of invoices received and approved by the RTD for equipment, labor, and materials expended. b. Where the Grantee performs the Project work through a con- tractor, the RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of the contract award price (as may be modified by change orders) all approved by the RTD. c. Where the Project work is part of a larger capital improvement, the RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of the unit prices bid as part of such larger contract and RTD approval of all costs including items which may not be identified in the larger contract. SECTION FOUR ELIGIBLE COSTS Costs eligible for reimbursement by the RTD under this grant Agreement are limited to the actual cost of the acquisition of real property and construction of the approved Project. SECTION FIVE GRANTEE REQUIREMENTS a. The Grantee will prepare any necessary right-of-way or other real property acquisition instruments for the Project, if any. b. The Grantee will provide design document review, construction inspec- tion, and engineering services for the Project. c. The Grantee will obtain any required appraisals, permits, and approvals and will be responsible for all citizen review and public agency coordination, if any. d. The Grantee will maintain the completed Project. e. The Grantee will construct the Project through its own work force or cause it to be constructed through formally advertised, free, open, and competitive bidding, and in accordance with such additional terms and conditions as the RTD may require. f. The Grantee shall permit and shall require its contractors to permit the RTD to inspect all data and records with regard to the Project. The RTD also may require the Grantee to furnish at any time pr ior to closeout of the Project, audit reports prepared according to generally accepted accounting principles . g. To the extent the work to be performed under this Agreement is performed by other than the employees of the Grantee or other Governmental entity and the total cost of such work is in excess of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00) the Project Labor Agreement incorporated herein by reference shall apply. -2- • I • • f • • • • h. Reimbursement by RTD for eligible costs is expressly contingent upon completion of the work to be performed under this Agreement on or before November 30, 1984. Grantee shall obtain the RTD's final inspection and written concurrence in the acceptance of the completed project improvement on or before December 15, 1984. SECTION SIX DESIGN APPROVAL The Grantee shall obtain the RTD's written approval of any street improve- ment plans prior to receiving construction bids. As part of this approval process, the RTD shall have the right to inspect any contract documents. SECTION SEVEN CONTINUING TRANSPORTATION USE In consideration for this Grant, the Grantee shall permit the RTD free use of the improvements funded hereunder for transportation purposes for a period of not less than five (5) years from the date said improvements are completed and made available for public use. In the event the Grantee interrupts, eliminates, or interferes with the RTD's use of said improvements, the Grantee shall immediately refund to the RTD the full amount of the Grant funds received hereunder, pro- rated over the five-year period. SECTION EIGHT FINAL INSPECTION The Grantee shall obtain the RTD's final inspection and written concurrence in the acceptance of completed Project improvements. The RTD, upon granting final acceptance, and receipt of invoices acceptable to and approved by RTD will within thirty (30) days thereafter, make payment in the amounts specified in Section Three above, in conformance with the conditions stated therein. SECTION NINE HOLD HARMLESS -RTD NOT LIABLE Grantee, agrees to save and hold the RTD harmless from and against all suits, claims, and demands based upon any alleged damage to property or any alleged Injury to persons (including death) which may occur or be alleged to have occurred by or on account of any negligent act or omission on the part of the said Grantee, its subcontractors, or any of their servants, employees, or agents. The Grantee, at its own expense, will settle or defend any claims or litigation arising out of the performance of this Agreement. The RTD shall not be liable for any damage to the Project improvements through the routine use thereof unless caused solely by the negligence and/or omission of RTD employees. -3- • I • f • SECTION TEN TERMINATION • • • Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by g1vmg written notice specifying the date of termination, such notice to be given not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date therein specified. In the event the Grantee desires to cancel this Agreement after RTD has expended funds for design, but before construction has begun, Grantee shall reimburse the RTD for all design funds expended by RTD. In the event the Grantee desires to cancel this Agreement after Project construction during the initial five (5) year period, it may do so upon giving written notice to the RTD, specifying the date of termination, such notice to be given not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date therein specified. As a condition precedent to termination after Project construction, the Grantee shall reimburse the RTD for all Grant funds received under this Agreement, pro-rated over said five-year period. SECTION ELEVEN PROHIBITED INTERESTS No officer, member, or employee of the RTD, and no members of its governing body, and no other public official or employee of the governing body of the locality or localities included within the District, during his or her tenure or for one year therafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, or the proceeds thereof. SECTION TWELVE MISCELLANEOUS I. Notices. Any notice to be given hereunder shall be deemed given when sent by registered or certified mail to the addresses below: RTD Department of Legal Counsel 1600 Blake Street Denver, CO 80202 Grantee: The City of Englewood 3400 S. Elati Street Englewood, CO 80 II 0 2. Severability. Should any provision of this agreement be declared invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect regardless of such declaration. 3. Egual Employment Opportunity. In connection with the performance of this Agreement, the Grantee shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status, being handicapped, a disadvantaged person, or a disabled or Viet Nam era veteran. The Grantee shall take affirmative action to insure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, marital status, being handicapped, a disadvantaged person, or a disabled or Viet Nam era veteran. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: -4- • I • • - f • • , • • • employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment adver- tising; layoff or termination; rates of pay or other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 4. Agreement Binding. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 5. Laws to Apply. The Project shall be carried out in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and all applicable Federal laws &: regulations, and all local laws, ordinances and regulations. 6. Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended except in writing by mutual agreement of the parties, nor may rights be waived except by an instrument in writing signed by the party charged with such waiver. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement, effective the day and date first above written. APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM FOR THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT By Legal Counsel ATTEST: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT By General Manager GRANTEE: The City of Englewood By ------------By Title---------------- _,_ I • • - ' ( • , • • • EXHIBIT A City of Englewood 1984 Transit Street Improv~~ent Projects Location RTD Funds Dartmouth Avenue at Fox St., southwest corner intersection Floyd Ave. at Fox St., northwest corner and Floyd Ave. west of Fox St. South Broadway Avenue at Quincy Avenue, southbound South Broadway Avenue at Stanford Avenue, southbound Reconstruct Radius Relocate traffic signal, reconstruct radius, remove crosspan, construct catch basin, 18" RCP, curb, gutter, and sidewalk Reconstruct curb, gutter, and sidewalk Reconstruct curb, gutter, and sidewalk TOTAL s 3,468 14,177 .5,.526 2,317 s 2.5,488 lOr I . ---~- ' ---- \ Wesley Boktr City of ~nglewood Harvard Vossor ColleQe .....,.__~~!=. • • • I . • • • • • 0 SW Corner Dartmouth & Fox REMOVE VC&G 41.3 lF CONSTRUCT ... VC&G 5.D lF REMOVE CUABWALK 41.7 lF CONSTRUCT CW I 5.D lF REMOVE WALK 105 SF A8PHALT PATCH I TONS CONSTRUCT a· 'l e&G 17LF BA8ECOUR8E 15 TONS CONSTRUCT 4" WALK -243 SF 800WOAK l8 s. Fox St. Ealedllg17·Ft.AM!ua I ~~~~~~~~~---------/ ' 40' Radlua at lip ENiii NEER INCI DEPAR TMUT CITY OF ENGL EWOOD, COLORADO ·. • RECONSTRUCTION for R. T.D. Drawn Br : .JDL Date : .loll • 1984 • • • ... U) )( 0 u. • I (/) I --1---f----34.8' • • • ---· r / / / 0 40' Rac!M at Lip / Z-, / . ! ; " . I • ~ 18 .. ·Dia Tree w. ' I I : I Floyd ; :Ave. ( westbound ) See Sheet 2a ----~(~--------------------=M:AT:C:H~:L~:::E::::~:;.::::~ r 7 2 • - MATCH LJE REMOVE VC&G 23.0 LF IIBDIIE ~AUt 11ULF ..,. ...... 330 IF C0118TRUCT r VC&G 23.0 LF ~CWI H.1 LF . ~ r vc:&G wl 4• WALK MONO 11.1 LF COII8T r VC&G wl 4• WALK MONO 18.7 LF COMaTRUCT 4• WALK 6281' aAW 12.1 LF COII8T CATQt U.. wl r VC&G -18 .. R.C.P. aoLF REMOV£ ASPHALT 1M 8f' A8PttAL T PATQI 18 TONS .._.IECOIMIE 24 TONI 800 & ...... 18 WORK L8 • REMOVE & IIUET IIGNAL POLE L8 ( • • • • See SMel2 0 , I 2a 'C: ----------..::=;,J:.~~,l,-._.--------·--· ; (£~ I I I I I I I I Grass ! 1 i I \--(-- - - ----- -- -~ --.-:---~:-_ ! W. Floyd Ave. ( eastbound ) -----------------------~---- ---·------t--. -~~~---=·-.-_ -~;·_ :::;:.::===..:=-' IIIII--, .. ...,...,. CITY OF EllfiL£I'ODD, ctii.DRA/)() RECONSTRUCTION for R. T .D. Dr•n a,: 1.8 . Dele . J •• 1184 • • MATCH LliiE REMOVE vc:&G 23.0 Ll' ..._aawMK 11ULF _.,. CR088PMI 330 IF COIIIDUCT r vc:&G 23.0 LF ~CWI H.1 LF . COlleT r YCAG wl 4' WALK 11110110 11.1 LF COIIIT r VC&G wl 4' WALK 11110110 68.7 LF COIIITRUCT 4'" WALK 62 8F ... 12.8 LF COMaT CATCH IIAa. wl 8'" VC&G -18" ll.C.P. 10 LF REMOV£ ASPHALT 1M IF AU'HALT PATCH 18 TONI &AIECOIIRIE 24 TONI 800 & aPM•LD WOM L8 -REMOVE & RUET 8IGNAL POLE Ll ( • • • • S..SM812 0 Grass , I I I i I I I 2a \--,------------wm-- !_ ________ ~~ _ ~~~~~-~ ~ v-e~ ______ _ ,----·-·--·-----·----- ~--------·· ====· ·----··------ U.IEE.._ 'DENIITMEIIT CITY OF ENSLEI'ODD, ctJI. DIIADD RECONSTRUCTION for R. T .D. -Drawn By : I. B. Dote : ) ' • 1914 • • • -• • 0 SW Corner Quincy & Broadway 4 4'CrOMPM • Q) > c( • • • \ R.T.D. Sign ... CheN 8ec:tiDn q >-.. (.) c: -::s 0 REMOVE VC&G 12ULF ~WALK 161 8F REMOVE CAOSSPAN 82 SF CONSTRUCT 8" CROSIPAN 81 8F CONSTRUCT 4 .. WALK 11518F REPAIR CHASE SECTION La CONSTRUCT 8" VC&G 12 LF SAW 10LF • • ~ CONSTRUCT 8" VC&G 22LF CONST e• VC&G wl 6' PAN MLF CONSTRUCT 8" CR088PAN at8F REMOVE A8PHAL T .... ASPHALT PATCH UTONI IAIECOIIRIE \ 7.6TONa • ~ DENitTIEIIT CITY OF EN6LEWOOD, COLORADO RECONSTRUCTION for R.T.D. ·. N .· Drawn By : JDL Date : ....... ~84 • • ( • • • • A RESOLuTION APPOINTING D.\VIO .J. ~ZIF.S ASSISTANT CITY A'M'ORNEY. WHEREAs, the City of fhgleWOOd, a Cblorado bane rule m...,icipal corporation, desires to anploy tavid .J. Menzies as Assistant City Attorney on a retainer basis; to>J, 'llfEREFoRE, BE IT RESOLVFD BY THE CITY CXlUN:IL CF THE CITY OF DCL&iOOO, OlLORAOO: 1. 'lhat tavid .J. Menzies, Attorney at Law, is appointed Assistant City Attorney. 2. 'lhat Hr. Menzies• specific duties will be to provide legal services in the area of enployee labor relations and as a substitute for the fotmicipal Cburt Prosecutor. He will also be available for special cases assigned to him by the City Attorney. 3. 'lhat Hr. Menzies will be paid a minimun monthly retainer of $1,000 at an hourly rate of $90. 4. Billing for excess hours over the $1,000 minimun monthly retainer will be accumulative and not monthly. s. This contract will became effective .July 1, 1984. 6. This contract may be terminated by either party upon thirty days• written notice to the other. 7. It is expressly understood that the services performed are contract services not entitling Assistant City Attorney to benefits of the City anplo;rees, specifically excluding health and dental insurance, life insurance, disability insurance, N:>rkmen• s Canpen&ation, Social Security, vacation leave, personal leave, disability leave, and/or such other and further benefits of an anployee of the City. AOOPI'ID AND APPRovm this 18th day of .June, 1984. Attest: Eugene L. Ot1s, Mayor ex off1clo Clty Clerk-Treasurer , I • • - - ' ' I I. : ': /. I' I I '· I· I: I i • r: • • • • -...__._ __ _ I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of !hglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of Resolution No._, Series of 1984. Gary R. H1gbee • [ [ I • • - - I I .. • .. ( [ • RESOLUTION NO. ~~ SERIES CF 1984- A RESOLUTION APPOINTING DIWID J. • • • ce:~-~ ~· MmZIES ASSISTANT CITY A~~ WHEREAs, the City of fllglewood, a Cblorado bane rule m~micipal corporation, desires to anploy David J. Menzies as Assistant City Attorney on a retainer basis; ~. THEREFoRE, BE IT RESOLVID BY THE CITY c:xJUlCIL CF THE CITY OF F:NGI..KXX>, CXX.ORAOO: 1. 'lhat David J. Menzies, Attorney at Law, is appointed Assistant City Attorney. 2. 'lhat Hr. Menzies' specific duties will be to provide legal services in the area of anployee labor relations and as a substitute for the Plmicipal Cburt Prosecutor. He will also be available for special cases assigned to him by the City Attorney. 3. 'lhat Hr. Menzies will be paid a minim1.111 monthly retainer of $1,000 at an hourly rate of $90. 4. Billing for excess hours over the $1,000 minim1.111 monthly retainer will be acc1.111ulative and not monthly. s. This contract will became effective July 1, 1984 • 6. This contract may be terminated by either party upon thirty days' written notice to the other. 7. It is expressly understood that the services performed are contract services not entitling Assistant City Attorney to benefits of the City anployees, specifically excluding health and dental insurance, life insurance, disability insurance, Workmen's Canpensation, Social Security, vacation leave, personal leave, disability leave, and/or such other and further benefits of an anployee of the City. AOOPriD AND APPRoVID this 18th day of June, 1984. ;s/~~ Attest: EUgene L. Otls, Plllyor ex off1c1o City Clerk-Treasurer I • • • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of &lglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and for;;x is a true, accurate and oanplete copy of Resolution No. , Series of 1984. Gary R. Higbee --- f [ I • • RESOLUTION t«>.~ SERIES <F 1984 • • • A RESOLUTION APPOINTING BEVERLY J. BRIZEE AS PARAI..EX;M. 'ro THE CITY AT'roRNEY. WHEREAS, City Co~n::il, at the request of the City Attorney Attorney, deans it advantageous to appoint a paralegal to the City Attorney, being that a paralegal is needed for the operation of the City Attorney's office; lUi, 'DfEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY CXlUtCIL CF THE CITY <F DGLfl«XD, COLORADO: 1. '!hat Beverly J. Brizee is hereby appointed paralegal to the City Attorney caaneuc:ing June 19, 1984 for an indefinite period of time. 2. '!hat the salary for Beverly J. Brizee shall be at the rate of $26,796 per year, said 5'110~t to be prorated fran the effective date of appointment to the end of calendar year 1984. AOOPTID AY> APPROVID this 18th day of June, 1984. Attest: &Jgene L. 0t1s, l'tllyor ex off1cio city Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of Resolution No. __ , Series of 1984. Gary R. Higbee 7 o ... I • • - - • • • • e:e: RESOLUTION 00. c{ .a SERIES CF 1984 __ _ A RESOLUTION APPOINTING BEVERLY J. BRIZEE AS PARALEX>M. TO THE CITY ATTORNEY. WHEREAS, City Co~il, at the request of the City Attorney Attorney, deans it advantageous to appoint a paralegal to the City Attorney, being that a paralegal is needed for the operation of the City Attorney's office; t-Oi, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVID BY THE CITY <XXJOCIL CF THE CITY OF Eta.S«XX>, COLORADO: 1. 'lhat Beverly J. Brizee is hereby appointed paralegal to the City Attorney commencing June 19, 1984 for an indefinite period of time. 2. 'lhat the salary for Beverly J. Brizee shall be at the rate of $26,796 per year, said ~unt to be prorated fran the effective date of appointment to the end of calendar year 1984. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 18th day of June, 1984. Attest: ex off1cio city Clerk-Treasurer I, Gny R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of fhglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoi!19 is a true, accurate and canplete copy of Resolution No • .d..,i, Series of 1984. Gary R. Higbee I . .. P R 0 C L A M A T I 0 N WH EREAS , the flag of th e United State s of Am e rica i s a visible symbol of our history for virtually all U. S. citizen s living today; and WH EREAS, for citi z ens of other countries, particularly those behind the iron curtain, the Star s and Stripes kindle hopes of libert y and independence; and WH EREAS , to commemorate th e anniversary of its adoption on Jun e 14, 1 97 7, Con g ress ha s set a s id e the twenty -on e da ys from Flag Da y through Independence Day as a per i od to honor Am e rica; and WH EREAS , b y displaying the national colors during th i s twenty-one-day salute to America, we symbolize a united democracy, a country that stands alone as a pillar of free- dom and a gatewa y to opportunity; NOW, TH EREFOR E , I, EUGENE L. OTIS, Ma y or of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby proclaim th e twenty-one days, June 14 through July 4, as a period to honor America and that there be public gathering s and act iv ities at which the people can celebrate and honor th e ir country in an appropriate mann e r. GIV EN under my hand and seal th is 18th da y o f J une, 1 98 4 . Eugene L. Otis, Mayor • I -• • • C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE June 13, 1984 SUBJECT CONCRETE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1984 INITIATED BY Andy McCown, City t~anager ACTl ON PROPOSED Motj on aythorj zing Pi rector of Engineering Servj ces to send • 30-day concrete repair notices to propert¥ owners per attached list BACKGROUND By City Code, construction and maintenance -of-curb, gutter, and sidewalk on City right-of-way, is the responsibility of adjacent property owners. Accordingly, the City accepts responsibility for concrete within street intersections, at alley intersections, and adjacent to City-owned facilities. Each year, in an attempt to reduce the amount of curb, gutter, and/or sidewalk in need of repair, monies are budgeted in the PIF ($50,000 for 1984). Property owners are asked, by means of 30-day concrete notices, to make necessary repairs. When owners fail to comply, the City contracts for the required replacement and files a lien against the property, with the total amount due with the next property tax payment. Monies expended in this manner are collected by Arapahoe County and reimbursed to the City of Englewood. The cost of necessary concrete repairs that are of City responsibility are liquidated from the program fund balance. This year, in much the same manner as last year, the Department of Engineering Services is proposing to spend the majority of available concrete replacement fundingon streets and avenues scheduled for asphaltic overlay in our annual Over- lay Program. Again, we will ·be cold planing portions of these streets prior to overlay; and properly maintained curb and gutter is essential to provide proper drainage and proper asphalt edging adjacent to the concrete. The proposed 1984 Overlay Project, to be addressed at a later date, is as follows: 1800-2300 W. Bates Ave. *3000-3100 W. Chenang::;Ave. 1 • *400-700 W. Dartmouth Av~ -(_{ ~ *3100-3200 S. Fox St. *200-1100 W. Kenyon Av • *4200 ~. lincoln St. 1100-1300 W. Nassau Ave. 2700-2800 S. Raritan St. 2700 -2800 S. Shoshone St. 3700-4000 S. Windermere St. • I • • - • (~ • • • -2- Broadway overlay Quincy to Belleview by Colorado State Dept. of Highways in August at CDOH expense of approximately $200,000 Streets and avenues scheduled for necessary concrete replacement, and 30-day concrete repair notices, are noted with an asterisk. Streets and avenues not scheduled for concrete work are excluded for budgeting rea- sons. To address all of the curb and gutter needing repair on all of the proposed 1984 Overlay Streets (and not including unattached .sidewalk} would require a 1984 concrete budget of approximately $90,000--some $40,000 more than the available fund- ing of $50,000. FINANCIAL The required work would involve approximately 75 properties, and total assessments would be in the range of $41,700. As you will note from the attached list, bills to property owners ~ill range between $40.00 and $2,100.00. Total of assessments Total of City responsibility Funding available in PIF RECOrtriENDATION $41,700.00 8,300.00 $50,000.00 In accordance with the City Code, we would like for Council to authorize the Depart- ment of Engineering Services to send 30-day concrete repair notices to all of the affected property owners. Council should allow for comments from these owners at their regular meetings of July 2, and July 16. Work adjacent to properties not com- plying with the 30-day notices would be accomplished by the City in August and September, 1984, with a list of liens to be submitted to Council in October. These liens would be payable in April, 1985 with their regular 1984 property taxes. As mentioned before, we are addressing mainly that work which is required in con- junction with our 1984 Overlay Program. The remainder of the work in the Overlay Program, as well as work required throughout Englewood, will be submitted to City Council as a recommended City-wide concrete replacement program at a later date . RK/lo Attachs.: list of 30-day notices, proposed program schedule; proposed not i fication letter to owners; standard 30-day concrete repair notice SUGGESTED ACTION: MOVED BY SECOND YES NO ABSENT • • I • - - • • • • • • PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR CONCRETE REPLACEMENT PROGRAt-1 1984 MONDAY, June 18, 1984 Council authorizes Director of Engineering Services to send 30-day concrete repair notices WEDNESDAY, June 20, 1984 30-day notices mailed; 1st publication of Notice to Contractors MONDAY, June 25, 1984 Plans and specifications available WEDNESDAY, June 27, 1984 2nd publication of Notice to Contractors MONDAY, July 2, 1984 Regular Council meeting; comments from affected owners TUESDAY, July 3, 1984 3rd publication of Notice to Contractors MONDAY, July 9, 1984 Open bids MONDAY, July 16, 1984 Regular Council meeting; Award of Contract; comments from affected property owners MONDAY, July 23, 1984 Permit cutoff for private construction MONDAY, July 30, 1983 Private construction cutoff WEDNESDAY, August 1, 1984 Start construction (45 days) FRIDAY, September 14, 1984 Estimated date construction completed OCTOBER, 1984 List of assessments complete NOVEMBER, 1984 liens filed with Arapahoe County APRIL, 1985 Lien payment due with property taxes PK/lo 6/13/84 • I • n- • • • • • • City of Englewood Dear Englewood Property Owner: 3400 S. Elatl Straat Engi-OOd, Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 7111·1140 Later this summer. the City plans to cold plane and overlay from . Before we can do-:-t:-h-:i-s-.-t7h_e __ _ concrete curb and gutter that is deteriorated adjacent to your property needs to be repaired. Properly maintained curb and gutter is essential to provide proper drainage. According to the City Code. the concrete repair costs are the respon- sibility of the property owner. The attached letter explains the minimum amount of concrete that needs to be repaired. along with an estimated cost. You may have additional sidewalks or driveways that also need repair. but we are only requiring replacement of the concrete that directly affects the overlay project at this time. You may wish to consider doing all the needed repairs nov. As described in the attachment. you can hire the work to be done by your own licensed contractor within the next 30 days. or the City will hire one to complete your work and collect the costs through the 1984 property taxes due in April. 1985. If you have any questions about your concrete repairs. please call •Y office for additional information at 761-1140. Ext. 500. If you have comments that you would like to express to the City Council concerning the concrete repairs. you .. y do so at either the July 2 or July 16th regular City Council aeeting at 7:30 p.a . in the Council Chambers at City Hall. 3400 S. Elati Street • Thank you for your cooperation. Yours truly. Gary R. Diede Director of Engineering GRD/mh Attachment • _J_ I • • ~ ·!n • • • • City of Englewood 3400 S. Eleti Street Englewood, Coloredo 10110 Phone (303) 761-1140 As the owner of the following-described property: your attention is called to the following condition(s) that exist in the concrete adjacent to that property: broken, displaced, or deteriorated to the point of being hazardous to pedestrians. You are requested to eliminate contractor,who is licensed and within the next thirty days. this condition by having a concrete bonded in Englewood, do the work Failure on your part to comply with this request in the time speci- fied will be cause for this office to proceed with the repair under the authority of Section 12-2-36, 1969 Revised Municipal Code of the City of Englewood. Further information can be obtained by con- tacting the office of the Director of Engineering Services at 761-1140, Ext. 500. Sincerely, Gary R. Diede, P.E. Director of Egineering Services lo • IJ.J.J4 t CONSTaUCTION AND aiPAia Of IIDIWA.Lill 11-l ·IS• COHSTIUCT-..... Alai ey CIT'I- COli.ICT-I • ,. SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 4520 Mortgage Inv. Co. of El Paso, Texas 9034 E. Easter Pl., St. 200 Englewood, CO 80112 4524 Helm, Kathleen Byron 3706 S. Bannock St. Englewood, CO 80110 4528 Hall, Oneta M. 4530 4615 4575 4755 • 4528 S. Broadway Englewood, CO 80110 Capra, David E. 3990 S. Holly St. Engl ewood, CO 80110 Hill, Gladys M. 6641 S. Greenwood St. Littleton, CO 80121 K & P Corporation 4575 S. Broadway Englewood, CO 80110 Larson, Daniel L. 7865 E. Mississippi Ave. #403 Denver, CO 80231 • • • 0 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 4300-5000 South Broadway LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2077-10-1-24-002 Lots 5 & 6, Blk. 56, S. Bdwy. Hts., 4520 S. Bdwy. 2077-10-1-24-003 Lots 7, Blk 56, S. Bdwy Hts., 4524 S. Bdwy. 2077-10-1-24-005 Lots 9-11, Blk. 56, S. Bdwy Hts., 4528 S. Bdwy 2077-10-1-24-006 Lots 12-13, Blk. 56 S. Bdwy. Hts., 4530 S. Bdwy 2077-10-2-00-005 Beg. 472 ~ Ft. N & 50 Ft. W. of S.E. Cor. of N.W ~ Sec. 10, TH W. 125Ft., TH N. 62 ~ Ft. TH. E. 125 Ft. TH. S. 62 ~ Ft. to Beg. 10-5-68, 2077-10-2-17-014 Lots 25 -36, Blk. 1, Green Sub., 4575 S. Bdwy. 2077-10-3-01-019 Lots 40 -41, Blk. 8 Leeland Hts. 4755 S. Broadway • ESTIMATED QUANTITIES R & R 42.0 L.F. VC&G R & R 50.5 L.F. VC&G R & R 74.0 L.F. VC&G R & R 28.7 L.F. VC&G ~ & R 6.0 L.F. VC&G R & R 6.0 L.F. VC&G R & R 6.0 L.F. VC&G EST.TOTAL COST 811.40 975.70 $1,429.60 $ 554 .50 $ 116.00 $ 116.00 $ 116.00 • SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 4391 5001 4830 4840 4876 • Golden. Stephen S. 2000 E. 12th Avenue. #40 Denver. CO 80206 Crouch. J. William 5001 S. Broadway Englewood. CO 80110 Ratliff. Alvin Jay 3501 S. Corona St •• Suite 1 Englewood. CO 80110 Verner. R. H. & Beverly D. Jt. Ten. 5520 E. Iliff Ave. Denver. CO 80222 Case. James L. & Constance H. Jt. Ten. 50 Midland Road Colorado Springs. CO 80906 • • • () 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 4300-5000 South Broadway LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2077-10-2-01-020 Lots 25-31 Blk. 1. Wollenwebers Bdwy Hts. 2nd Add . When plat is filed desc. as being 50 Ft. W. & 45 Ft. S. of N.E. Cor . N.W. ~ Sec. 10-5-68. Th . S. 175Ft •• Th. W. 125 ft •• 4391 S. Bdwy. ESTIMATED QUANTITIES R & R 10 L.F. VC&G R & R 25.6 S. F. 4" S. W. Saw 5 L.F. Cone. 2077-10-3-15-025 R & R 19.5 L.F. VC&G Lots 1-16 & Lots 30-31 & Lots 37-48. together with vac. alley lying between Lots 1-12 & 37-48 & 1/2 Vac. alley adj. Lots 13-16 & Lots 30-31 & Vac.Grand Ave. adj. on N .• Blk a. Harlem 2nd Add. 5001 S. Bdwy. 2077-10-4-09-007 R & R 8.0 L.F. VC&G Lots 15-16. Blk 73 Harlem. 4830 S. Bdwy. 2077-10-4-09-008 Lots 17-18. Blk 73. Harlem. 4840 S. Bdwy. 2077-10-4-09-009 Lots 19-20. Blk 73. Harlem. 4876 S. Bdwy. • R & R 2.0 L.F. VC&G R & R 12.0 L.F. VC&G EST.TOTAL COST $ 339.60 $ 376.70 $ 154.60 $ 38.60 • $ 231.80 - • • SITUS ADD. <MfEll & ADDRESS 4900 General Electric Pension 4950 • Trust -With Trustees of % Kinney Shoes 233 Broadway Nev York. N.Y. 10007 Crouch. Williaa J. 5001 S. Broadway • • • 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 4300-5000 South Broadway LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2077-10-4-22-001 150.01 Ft. of TR. 13 and 150.01 Ft. of N ~ of TR. 14. Locust Gdns. 4900 S. Broadway ESTIMATED QUANTITIES R & R 25.7 L.F. VC&G Saw. 22.6 Ft. 2077-10-4-22-044 R & R 18 L.F. VC&G S ~ TR. 14. except E. 20 Ft. and all TR. 15. Locust Gdns. 4940 S. Broadway • EST. TOTAL COST $ 607 .10 $ 347.80 • SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 3255 Ellingson, Dennis J. & Patricia A., Jt Ten 3255 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 3225 Hines, Elizabeth J. 3225 w. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 3205 Meehl, Florence F. 3205 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, co 80110 3195 3169 3143 3119 3103 • Apjoke, John W. & LaVonne P.,JtTen 3195 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Freeman, David A. & Becky S., Jt Ten 3169 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Dixler, Jerry Eugene & Anna Marie, Jt Ten 3143 w. Chenango Ave. Englewood, co 80110 Corn, Herbert R. & Graham, Richard N. 300 E. Hampden Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Mikita, Michael Andrew II & Linda Anne, Jt Ten 3101 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 • • • 0 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPR OVEMENTS 3000-3100 W. CHENANGO LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2077-08-3-01-003 Lot 18, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres 3rd Flg. 3255 W. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-01-004 Lot 19, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres 3rd Flg. 2077-08-3-01-005 Lot 20, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres 3rd Flg. 2077-08-3-01-006 Lot 21, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres 3rd Flg. 2077-08-3-01-007 Lot 23, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres 3rd Flg. 2077-08-3-0l-008 Lot 23, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres 3rd Flg. 2077-08-3-01-009 Lot 24, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres 3rd Flg. 2077-08-3-01-010 Lot 25, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres 3rd Flg. • Page 1 ESTIMATED QUANTITIES EST. TOTAL COST Rem. 70 L.F. CWI; Const. $1,633.30 lb L.F. CWI (6"); Const. 54 L.F. CWI (4") Rem. 47.5 L.F. CWI; Const. 1,198.10 25 L.F. CWI (4"); Const. .!2.5 L.F. CWI (6"); Saw 10.6 L.F. R & R 5 L.F. CWI; Saw 138.90 5.3 L.F. Saw 10.6 L.F .; Cons~ 5 L.F. CWI (4"); Const. 5 L.F. CWI (6"); Rem. 10 L.F. CWI Rem. 35 L.F. CWI; Const. 25 L.F. CWI (6"); Const. 10 L.F. CWI (4"); Saw 10.6 L.F. R & R 10 L.F. CWI; Saw 5.3 L.F. R & R 12 L.F. CWI Rem. 33 L.F. CWI; Const. 12 L.F. CWI (6"); Const. 21 L.F. CWI (4"); Saw 5.3 L.F. 294.00 897.80 251.80 271.10 810.40 - SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 3071 3045 3005 3280 3004 3030 3060 • Bell, Frederick W., III & Linda K., Jt Ten 3071 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Santangelo, Loretta A. & Hall, G. Bradley, Jt Ten 3045 w. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Rayburn, Susan Joy 3005 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Brown, Bonnie J. 3280 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Thomas, David George 3004 w. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Nguyen, Njoc Van & Dang, Quyet Dinh, Jt Ten 3030 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Ciero, Richard C. & Judith A., Jt Ten 3060 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 • • • 0 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 3000-3100 W. CHENANGO LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2077-08-3-0l-012 Lot 27, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres 3rd Flg. 3071 W. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-01-013 Lot 28, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres 3rd Flg. 3045 w. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-01-015 Lot 30, Blk. 23, Centennial Acres, 3rd Flg. 3005 W. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-04-001 Lot 15, Blk. 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3280 W. Chenango Ave. 2077-03-3-04-017 Lot 1, Blk. 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3004 W. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-04-018 Lot 2, Blk. 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3030 W. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-04-019 Lot 3, Blk. 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3060 W. Chenango Ave . • ESTIMATED QUANTITIES R & R 20 L.F. CWI; Saw 10.6 L.F. R & R 10 L.F. CWI R & R 10 L.F. CWI R & R 10 L.F. CWI Rem. 32.8 L.F. CWI; Const. 10 L.F. CWI (6"); Const. 22.8 L.F. CWI (4") R & R 26.2 L.F. CWI (6") Rem. 80 L.F. CWI; Const. 14.3 L.F. CWI (6"); Const. 65.7 L.F. CWI (4") EST. TOTAL COST $ 503.60 225.90 225.90 225.90 773.50 677.10 • 1,853.60 - SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 3084 Destefano, Charles F. 3084 w. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 3098 Lord, Bobby D. & Janice 3108 3168 3198 3200 3220 • I., Jt Ten 3098 w. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Yonker, Phillip W. & Norma K., Jt Ten 3180 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Waldron, Robert T. & Gina 3168 w. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Lewis, Wayne F. & Retta L., J t Ten 3198 w. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 P i tney, Kenneth A. & Gwendolyn L., Jt Ten 3200 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Rogers, Harold & Judy L., J t Ten 3220 W. Chenango Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 • • - 0 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE H!PROVEME!<TS 3000-3100 W. CHENANGO LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2077-08-3-04-020 Lot 4, Blk. 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3084 W. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-04-021 Lot 5, Blk. 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3098 W. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-04-022 Lot 6, Blk. 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3108 W. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-04-024 Lot 8, Blk. 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3168 W. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-04-026 Lot 1 0 , Blk . 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3198 w. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-04-027 Lot 11, Blk. 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3200 w. Chenango Ave. 2077-08-3-04-028 Lot 12, Blk. 21, Centennial Acres 2nd Flg. 3220 w. Chenango Ave . • ESTIMATED QUANTITIES Rem. 69.8 L.F. CWI; Const. 40 L.F. CWI (4"); Const. 19.8 L.F. CWI (6") R & R 35.5 L.F. CWI; Saw 10.6 L.F. Rem. 10 L.F. CWI; Const. 10 L.F. CWI R & R 10 L.F. CWI; Saw 10.6 L.F. Rem. 53.5 L.F . CWI; Const. 24.5 L.F. cwr (6"); Const. 29 L.F. CWI (4"); Saw 5.3 L.F. Rem. 48 L.F. CWI; Con st. 14 L.F. CWI (6"); Const. 34 L.F. CWI (4") I Saw 5.3 L.F. Rem. 63 L.F. CWI; Const. 22 L.F. CWI (6")1 Con st. 41 L.F. CWI (4") I Saw 5.3 L.F . EST. TOT AL COST $1,4 6 9.80 808.60 225.90 2 77.70 1, 314.10 1,1 55 .70 1,520.60 - - SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 481 415 511 509 607 607 3100 • Dyche, Gerald R. Roth Mary Lou & Noller, Darlene M. 481 W. Dartmouth Avenue Englewood, CO 80110 Walsh, James E. & Mary L. Jt. Ten. 3242 S. Elati Englewood, CO 80110 Kucharski, Lawrence F. & Marthabell 511 W. Dartmouth Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Boshell, Marian L. 1430 E. Cornell Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Bittner, Lyman H. 607 W. Dartmouth Englewood, CO 80110 Bittner, Lyman H. 607 W. Dartmouth Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Chaput, Francis P. & Betty J, Jt. Ten. 3372 S. P ar1 Street Englevood, CO 80110 • • • 0 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 400-700 W. Dartmouth Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1971-34-2-22-012 Lots 23-24, Blk. 4, S.G. Hamlins Add. 481 W. Dartmouth 1971-34-2-22-013 Lots 25-26, Blk 4, S.G. Hamlins Add. 415 W. Dartmouth Ave. 1971-34-2-23-011 Lots 22-24, Blk. 3, Taylors Add. 511 W. Dartmouth 1971-34-2-23-012 Lots 25, 26 & W. 15 Ft. of 27, Blk. 3, Taylors Add. 509 W. Dartmouth 1971-34-2-24-010 Lots 20-24, Blk 2, Taylors Add. 1971-34-2-24-012 Lots 27-29, Blk. 2, Taylors Add. 607 W. Dartmouth Ave. 1971-34-3-06-001 Lot 1, Blk. 1, Uhlman Sub. 3100 s. Fox Street • ESTIMATED QUANTITIES R & R 18.8 L.F. VC&G Saw. 7 . 5 L. F. R & R 32 L.F. VC&G Saw 9.0 L.F. R & R 18 L.F. VC&G R & R 12 L.F. VC&G R & R 5 L.F. VC&G Saw 5 L.F. Cone. R & R 31 L.F. VC&G Saw. 12.5 L.F. R & R 5 L.F. VC&G Saw. 2.5 L.F. EST. TOTAL COST $ 399.90 $ 662.20 $ 347.80 $ 261.10 $ 121.10 $ 660.10 $ 108.80 - • c I SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 3101 Waldschmidt , Daniel & Joy Jt. Ten. • 11030 W. Tulane Avenue Littleton, CO 80127 ,. • • • 0 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 400-700 W. Dartmouth Avenue LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1971-34-3-06-024 Lot 24, Blk. 1, Uhlman Sub. 3101 S. Elati St. • ESTIMATED QUANTITIES R & R 75 L.F. VC&G Saw. 8 L.R. EST. TOTAL COST $1,488.10 • • • • 0 ( I 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 3100-3200 S. Fox Street SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED gUANTITIES EST. TOTAL COST 595 Besser, Albert William & 1971-34-3-06-012 R & R 36 L.F. CWI(4") $ 813.30 Paula Faye, Jt. Ten. Lot 12, Blk. 1, 595 w. EastiMn Uhlman Sub. Englewood, CO 80110 595 W. Eastman Ave. • • ( SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 3698 3696 3655 3690 3686 3695 3660 • McKinney, Marlene & Kinch, Robert & Frederick, Larry 2130 E. Floyd Ave. Englewood, CO 80110 Fray, Norma Isabel 3696 S. Delaware St. Englewood, CO 80110 Bowaut, Inc. c/o Gary Autreg *16 Cherrymoor Dr. Englewood, CO 80110 Lee, James H. 3690 s. Fox Englewood, CO 80110 Garrett, Kenneth Lee & Esther June, Jt Ten 3810 s. Fox St. Englewood, CO 80110 Sax, R. w. & Julia, & Roehrs, R. C. & Shirley, Jt Ten 4 Waring Lane Littleton, CO 80121 Hellberg, Inc. c/o Francis H. Peterson 237 Cameron Ave. Santa Haria, CA 93454 • • • Q 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 200-11 00 w. Kenyon LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2077 -03-2-14-007 Lots 7-8, Blk. 3, Killies' l/3 Ea. Bdwy. Hts. 3698 s. Cherokee 2077 -03-2-15-007 Lot 7, Blk. 1, Bobay Sub. 3696 S. Delaware St. 2077 -03 -2-16-013 Lots 1-16, Blk. 18, Englewood 3655 S. Delaware 2077-03 -2-17-007 Lots 17-20, Ex. N. 10' of Lot 20 , Blk. 19, Englewood 3690 s. Fox St. 2077-03-2-18-007 Lots 17-20, Blk. 20, Englewood 3686 S. Galapago St. 2077-03-2-18-008 Lots 15-16, B1k. 20, Englewood 3695 S. Fox St. 2077-03-2-19-001 Lots 1-32, Blk. 21, Englewood, & Vac. alley 3660 s . Huron St • • ESTIMATED QUANTITIES R & R 4 3.0 L.F . VC&G R & R 1 5 L.F. VC&G; Saw 7.5 L .F . R & R 15.0 L.F. VC&G; Saw 2. 50 L.F. R & R 33.4 L.F. VC&G R & R 33.4 L.F. VC&G R & R 5.0 L.F. VC&G; Saw 2.5 L.F. R & R 11.0 L.F. VC&G; Saw 2.5 L.F. EST. TOTAL COST s 830 .80 326.50 365 .10 645 .3 0 64 !>.30 108.80 • 224.80 - • ( SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 3700 3701 3700 3701 3710 3705 3675 • Fox, Elizabeth D. 3700 s. Huron St. Englewood, CO 80110 Siegel, Craig F. 3701 s. Galapago St. Englewood, CO 80110 Pillow, Harold L. & Beverly D., Jt Ten 3700 s. Fox St. Englewood, CO 80110 Ortgysen, Nellie & Shannon, Cornelia Elizabeth, Jt Ten 3701 S. Elati St. Englewood, CO 80110 Warren, Steve M. & Mai, Charles F., Jr., Jt. Ten. 3710 s. Elati Street Hoskins, William Ward & Lucille M., Jt. Ten. 3939 s. Acoma EngleWood, CO 80110 Cherokee Kivas Homeowners Association 3675 s. Cherokee St., fl08 c/o Robert Hildebrand Englewood, CO 80110 • • • Q 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 200-1100 W. KENYON LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2077-03-2-20-001 Lots 1-2 & N. 10' of 3, Blk. 4, Logandale 3700 S. Huron St. 2077-03-2-20-018 Lots 46-48, Blk. 4, Logandale 3701 s. Galapago St. 2077-03-2-22-001 Lots 1-2, Blk. 2, Logandale 3700 S. Fox St. 2077-03-2-22-019 Lots 46-98, Blk. 2, Logandale 3701 S . Elati St. 2077-03-2-23-001 Lot 1, Blk. 1, Fowler Sub. 3710 S. Elati St. 2077-03-2-25-025 W. 45 Ft. of Lots 47-48, Blk. 6, Ham & Killies Bdwy. Hts. 28400-006-047 2077-03-2-35-001-040 Unit 104-Unit 710 as per condo declaration recorded in 82920, P457, Cherokee Kivas Condos 3675 S. Cherokee • ESTIMATED QUANTITIES R & R 24.0 L.F. CW I (4") R & R 47.4 L.F. CWI (4"); Saw 10.6 L.F. R & R 22.0 L.F. CWI (4"); Saw 15.0 L.F. R & R 33.5 L.F. CWI (4"); Saw 10.5 L.F. Rem. 90 L. F. CWI Replace 71.0 L.F. CWI (4") Replace 19.0 L.F. CWI (6") R & R 2 L.F. VC&G Saw. 2.5 L.F. R & R 23 L.F. VC&G Saw. 2.5 L.F. Page 2 EST. TOTAL COST $ 54 2.10 1,122.10 574.30 808.10 2,077.70 50.80 • 4 56.50 SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 3690 B.P.O.E. 2122 3677 3701 3701 3700 3700 • 3690 s. Jason st. Englewood, CO 80110 Englewood Executive Center, lnc. 3677 s. Huron St . Englewood, CO 8011 0 Eckman , Navalyn F . 3701 s. Huron St. Englewood , co 80110 Winchester Investments 3001 S. Tejon St. Englewood, CO 80110 Preferred Machining Corp. 3730 s. Kalamath St. Englewood, co 80110 Lifetime Til & Mfg. Co., Inc. 3700 S. Lipan St. Englewood, CO 80110 • • • 0 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 200-1100 w. Ken yon LEGAL DESCRIPTI ON 2077-04-1-06-0 02 Lots 26-3 2 , Blk . 23, Englewood 36 90 S . J ason St. 2077-04-1-06-011 Part of Lots 15 and 18 and all of Lots 16-17 , Blk. 13 and Lots 1-32, Blk. 2 2 and Lots 1-16, Blk.23, Englewood and vac . Sts. and Alleys between S.D. Lots Desc. as ESTIMATED QUANTITIES R & R 78 L.F. VC&G R & R 30.8 L.F. VC&G Saw . 7.5 L.G. Beg. S.E. Cor. Lot 16, Blk. 22 Th. W. 4 51.19 Ft., Th. N: 392.16 Ft ., Th. E. 18 5.06 Ft., Th. N. 85.04 Ft., Th. E. 266 .13 Ft., Th. S . 4 77 .17 Ft. to Beg. 3677 S . Huron St. 2077-04 -1-07-017 N. 10 Ft. of Lot 46, All 4 7-48 , Blk. 5, Logandale 3701 Huron St. 2077-04-1-08-012 Lots 43-48, Blk. 6 Logandale 3701 s. Inca St. 2077-04-1-09-001 Lots 1-6, Blk. 7, Logandale 3700 s. Kalamath St. 2077-04-1-10-001 Lots 1-2, Blk. 8, Logandale 3700 s. Lipan St. • R & R 27.6 L.F. CWI (4") R & R 10.0 L.F. CWI (4") Saw. 2.5 R & R 8.3 L.F. VC&G; Saw 6.5 L.F. R & R 45 L.F. VC&G; Saw 2.5 L.F. Page 3 EST. TOTAL COS T $1,529 .50 63 1 .80 623.50 229.90 192.20 881.60 - SITUS ADD. OWNER 5o ADDRESS 3701 3703 • Joy Industries, Inc. c/o Colorado State Bank 1801 S. Kal ... th St. Denver, CO 80234 HocJlund, Leonard L. " Granthaa, Evaline H., Ten. in ~n 3703 s. Delaware St. Enqlewood, CO 80110 • • • 0 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 200-1100 W. KENYON Page 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ESTIMATED QUANTITIES EST. TOTAL COST 2077-04-1-10-017 R' R 10.0 L.F. VCloG $ 193.20 N~ of Lot 42 and all Lots 43-48, Blk. 8, Logandale 3701 s. Kalamath St. 2077-03-2-23-018 R 5o R 12 L.F. CWI (4") $ 271.10 Parcel in NE Cor. 100' N. 5o S. X 125Ft. E. 5o W., Blk. B, Logandale, Ex. W. 8 Ft. 3703 S. Delaware St. • - ( SITUS ADD. OWNER & ADDRESS 4244 4249 4257 • Brane, Francis L. 4244 S. Lincoln St. Englewood, CO 80110 Weber, Sally & Waite, Willi• 4249 S. Lincoln St. Englewood, CO 80110 Johnson, Annabel G. & Shirley Ann and Donald Otis 4257 S. Lincoln St. Englewood, CO 80110 • • • 0 1984 OVERLAY CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 4244-4257 S. Lincoln St. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2077-03-4-26-Q05 S ~ Lot 10 All Lots 11-12, Blk. 26, S. Bdwy. Hts. 4244 S. Lincoln St. 2077-03-4-25-016 Lot 36, Blk. 25, S. Bdwy. Hts. 4249 S. Lincoln St. 2077-03-4-25-014 Lot 31, Blk. 25, S. Bdwy Hts. Lot 32 and S. 4/5 of 33, Blk. 25 S. Bdwy Hts. 4257 S. Lincoln St • • ESTIMATED QUANTITIES R & R 6 L.F. VC&G Saw. 5 • 3 L. F. R & R 12 L.F. C.W.I. (4") R & R 12 L.F. VC&G EST. TOTAL COST $ 141.90 271.10 231.80 - - C 0 U N C I L DATE June 12, 1984 • • • C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM l1 B i SUBJECT -APPOINTMENTS TO ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY INITIATED BY --------~C~i~t~y~C~o~u~n~c~i~l~--------------------------------- ACTION PROPOSED· ___ A_p~p~o __ in __ t __ me_n_t_s __ b_e __ m_a_d_e __ t_o __ t_h_e __ E_n~g_l_e_w_o __ o __ d_D_o_w_n_t_o_w_n ____ __ Development Authority Background Two four-year terms of office as members of the Englewood Downtown Development Authority will expire June 30, 1984. Interviews for these two positions were conducted by City Council. ~ Directive • It is the directive of City Council that the following individuals be appointed to four-year terms of office to the Englewood Downtown Development Authority effective June 30, 1984, expiring June 30, 1988: KEN MAUSOLF -reappointment JOHN OSWALD -new appointment. • I . - • • RESOLUTION NO. ,A SERIES OP 1984, • • • A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL SALARY FOR THE CITY MANAGER FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE CALENDAR YEAR 1984. WHEREAS, the City Council, by Charter, has the responsibility to adopt a Resolution authorizing payment of annual salaries for Council appointees; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows: The following annual salary is hereby established for the following appointee of City Council effective June 25, 1984 for the remainder of the calendar year 1984, to wit: City Manager . , . • ..... . $63,700.00 ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 18th day of June, 1984. EUGENE L. OTIS, Mayor Attest: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk -Treasurer o f the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above is a true, accurate and complete copy of Resolution No. , Series of 1984. Gary R. Rla6ee • I • • • RESOLUTION NO. c2( ~ SERIES OP 1984. • • - A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL SALARY FOR THE CITY MANAGER FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE CALENDAR YEAR 1984. WHEREAS, the City Council, by Charter, has the responsibility to adopt a Resolution authorizing payment of annual salaries for Council appointees; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows: The following annual salary is hereby established for the following appointee of City Council effective June 25, 1984 for the remainder of the calendar year 1984, to wit: City Manager .•.. . $63,700.00 ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 18th day of June, 1984. EUGENE L. OTIS, Mayor Attest: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood , Colorado, hereby certify that ~~bove is a true, accurate and complete copy of Resolution No. , Series of 1984. Gary R. Higbee • I • • • RESOLUTION NO. SERIES OF 1984. • • • A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ANNUAL SALARY FOR THE CITY MANAGER FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE CALENDAR YEAR 1984. WHEREAS, the City Council, by Charter, has the responsibility to adopt a Resolution authorizing payment of annual salaries for Council appointees; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows: The following annual salary is hereby established for the following appointee of City Council effective June 25, 1984 for the remainder of the calendar year 1984, to wit: City Manager .... . . . . . • $63,700.00 ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 18th day of June, 1984. EUGENE L. OTIS, Mayor Attest: ex offtcio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk -Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above is a true, accurate and complete copy of Resolution No. , Series of 1984. Gary R. Higbee • I • •