The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-10-01 (Regular) Meeting Agenda• - • • 0 City Council Meeting -Regular October 1, 1984 • • - • • • • • %--~.~~I, ~¢ ~ ~ /t:i?. J~. ~q ~ -;pl. ,<j-'/, #$~ J/.C, • 0 0 • I . - • • • • • • AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 1, 1984 7:30 P.M. Call to order, invocation by Reverend Jim Clark, Mayflower Congregational Church, 3001 South Acoma Street, pledge of allegiance by Boy Scout Troop Nos. 115 and 154, and roll call. 1. Minutes. (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of September 17, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Minutes of the special meeting of September 24, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) 2. Pre-Scheduled Visitors. (Please limit your pre- sentation to 10 minutes.) ~~~~n.S (a) Ms. Evelyn ~. President of Englewood Chapter of the Business and Professional Women, will be present to accept a proclamation con- cerning National Business Women's Week. (b) Mrs. Mary Carter , Chairman of the Bo a rd o f T rus t ees, South Suburban Park Founda ti on , will b e prese n t t o d i scuss mat te r s co n c e rning t h e Colora d o Greenway Trai l • 3. Other Visitors. to 5 ainutes.) (Please limi t your presentation 4 . Public Hearing. • I • - • • • • • Page 2 October 1, 1984 5. Communications -No Action Recommended. (a) Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of July 12, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Minutes of the Board of Career Service Com- missioners meeting of July 19, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (c) Minutes of the Englewood Housing Authority meetings of July 25 and 27, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (d) Minutes of the Englewood Downtown Development Authority meeting of August 1, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (e) Minutes of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals meeting of August 8, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (f) Minutes of the Water and Sever Board meeting of August 24, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (g) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Coaaission meeting of September 5, 1984. (Copies enclosed .) (h) Minutes of the Englewood Pub lic L ibrary Advisory Board meeting of Septeabe r 11, 1 984. (C opies enclosed.) 6. Coamunications -Actio n Recoaaended. (a) Council Communicat ion froa the Water and Sever Board concerning Rancho Suppl e aent 13. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Council Communication froa the Water and Sewer Board concerning Rancho Suppleaent 14. (Copies enclosed.) (c) Council Communication from the Water and Sewer Board concerning Southgate Supplement #101. (Copies enclosed.) (d) Council Coaaunication from the Water and Sewer Board concerning Southgate Suppleaent #102 . (Copies enclose d.) (e) Council Communication from the Planning and Zoning Comaisaion concerning the 1985-1986 Highway Work Program. (Copies enclosed.) • I • • ( • • • • Page 3 October 1, 1984 Agenda 6. Communications -Action Recommended (Continued). (f) Council Communication from the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning "The Broadway Planned Development." (Copies enclosed.) (g) Proclamation concerning the National Business Women's Week. (Copies enclosed.) 7. City Attorney. Ordinances on Final Reading. (a) Ordinance vacating a storm sewer and water line easement and granting an easement for a new water line in the Cinderella City parking lot. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Englewood, Colorado, and the Arapahoe Regional Library District and approving Addendum thereto for establishaent of the APAL Book Fund to better library services to citizens of Englewood and the County. (Copies enclosed.) Bills for Ordinances. (c) Bill vacating a storm sewer and water line easement and granting an easement for a new water line in the Cinderella City parking lot. (Copies enclosed.) (d) Bill granting to the Englewood Housing Authority $250,000 for the Englewood Home Rehabilitation Program and amending an agreeaent between the City of Englewood and the Englewood Housing Authority for administration of the Home Re- habilitation Program. (Bill and Council Communication enclosed.) Other Matters. (e) Attorney's Choice. • I • - ( • • • .. • Page 4 October I, 1984 Agenda 8. City Manager. (a) Resolution determining the Rules of Order and Procedure governing meetings by the City Council of the City of Englewood. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Council Communication from the City Manager concerning Englewood Recreation Center Landscape Material bid award. (Copies enclosed.) (c) Council Communication from the City Manager concerning Englewood Recreation Center Trees bid award. (Copies enclosed.) (d) Manager's Choice. 9. General Discussion. (a) Mayor's Choice. {b) Council Member's Choice. 10. Adjournment. /) ;i ., {dJ?c1::.~~ Cl~ Manager AM/sb I • • ( { • • • • AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 1, 1984 7:30 P.M. Call to order, invocation by Reverend Jim Clark, Mayflower Congregational Church, 3001 South Acoma Street, pledge of allegiance by Boy Scout Troop Nos. 115 and 154, and roll call. 1. Minutes. (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of September 17, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Minutes of the special meeting of September 24, 1984. (Copies enclosed.} 2. Pre-Scheduled Visitors. (Please limit your pre- sentation to 10 ainutes.) (a} Ms. Evelyn Hodges, President of Englewood Chapter of the Business and Professional Woaen, will be present to accept a proclamation con- cerning National Business Woaen's Week. (b) Mrs. Mary Carter, Chairaan of the Board of Trustees, South Suburban Park Foundation, will be present to discuss aatters concerning the Colorado Greenway Trail. 3. Other Visitors. (Please limit your presentation to 5 ainutes.) 4. Public Hearing. I • • ( ( • • • • Page 2 October 1, 1984 5. Communications -No Action Recommended. (a) Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of July 12, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Minutes of the Board of Career Service Com- missioners meeting of July 19, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (c) Minutes of the Englewood Housing Authority meetings of July 25 and 27, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (d) Minutes of the Englewood Downtown Development Authority meeting of August 1, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (e) Minutes of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals meeting of August 8, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (f) Minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of August 24, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (g) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of September 5, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (h) Minutes of the Englewood Public Library Advisory Board meeting of September 11, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) 6 . Communications -Action Re co mmended. (a) Council Communication from the Water and Se wer Board concerning Rancho Supplement #3. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Council Communication from the Water and Sewer Board concerning Rancho Supplement #4. (Copies enclosed.) (c) Council Communication from the Water and Sewer Board concerning Southgate Supplement #101. (Copies enclosed.) (d) Council Communication from the Water and Sewer Board concerning Southgate Supplement #102. (Copies enclosed.) (e) Council Communication from the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning the 1985-1986 Highway Work Program. (Copies enclosed.) I • • ( ( • • • • Page 3 October 1, 1984 Agenda 6. Communications -Action Recommended (Continued). (f) Council Communication from the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning "The Broadway Planned Development." (Copies enclosed.) (g) Proclamation concerning the National Business Women's Week. (Copies enclosed.) 7. City Attorney. Ordinances on Final Reading. (a) Ordinance vacating a storm sewer and water line easement and granting an easement for a new water line in the Cinderella City parking lot. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Englewood, Colorado, and the Arapahoe Regional Library District and approving Addendum thereto for establishaent of the APAL Book Fund to better library services to citizens of Englewood and the County. (Copies enclosed.) Bills for Ordinances. (c) Bill vacating a stora sewer and water line easement and granting an easeaent for a new water line in the Cinderella City parking lot. (Copies enclosed.) (d) Bill granting to the Englewood Housing Authority $250,000 for the Englewood Hoae Rehabilitation Program and amending an agreeaent between the City of Englewood and the Englewood Housing Authority for adainistration of the Hoae Re- habilitation Prograa. (Bill and Council Communication enclosed.) Other Matters. (e) Attorney's Choice. • I I • • ( ( • • • • Page 4 October 1, 1984 Agenda 8. City Manager. (a) Resolution determining the Rules of Order and Procedure governing meetings by the City Council of the City of Englewood. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Council Communication from the City Manager concerning Englewood Recreation Center Landscape Material bid award. (Copies enclosed.) (c) Council Communication from the City Manager concerning Eng l ewood Recreation Center T rees bid award. (Copies enclosed.) (d) Manager's Choice. 9. General Discussion. (a) Mayor's Choice. (b) Counci l Kember's Choice. 10. Adjournment. /) . ., (dJ ?c~it-~ cf.~ Manager AK/ab • • I • • ( ( ( • • • • PROPOSED CONSENT AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL October 1 , 1984 7:30 P, M. 1. Call to order. 2. Invocation by Reverend Jim Clark, Mayflower Congregational Church, 3001 South Acoma Street. 3. Pledge of Allegiance 154, and roll call . Boy Scout Troop Nos. 115 and 4. Roll Call. 5. Minute s . (a) Minutes of the regular meeting of September 17, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Minutes of the special meeting of September 24, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) 6. Pre-scheduled Visitors. (Please limit presentation to 10 minutes.) (a) M5. Evelyn Hodges, President of Englewood Chapter of the Business and Professional Women, will be present to accept a proclamation concerning National Business Women's Week. (b) Mr s. Mary Carter, Chairman of the Board of Trustees, South Suburban Park Foundation, will be present to discuss matters concerning the Colorado Greenway Trail. 7. Non-scheduled Visitors. (Please limit presentation to 5 minutes.) 8. Communications and Proclamations. (a) Communication from Business and Professional Women requesting proclamation. (Copies enclosed) • • I • ...... ( 10. • 11. ( • Consent Agend a Page 2 October 1, 1984 ·' 9. Consent Agenda Items. • • .. (a) Minute s of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of July 12, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (b) Minutes of the Board of Career Service Co mmi ssioners meeting of July 19, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (c) Minut es of the Englewood Hou si ng Author i t y meeting of J uly 25 and 27, 1984. (C opies enclosed.) (d ) Minute s of the Englewood Downtown Development Authority meeting of August 1, 1984. (C opi es enclosed.) (e) Mi nute s of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals mee t i ng of August 8, 1984. (C opies enclosed.) (f) Minut es o f the Wat er and Sewer Board meeting of August 24 , 1984. (Copies e nclosed.) (g) Minute s of th e Pla nn ing and Zoni ng Comm ission mee ting of September S , 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (h ) Minutes of th e Engl ewood Public Library Advisory Board meeting of September 11, 1984. (Copies enclosed.) (i) Ord ina n ce vacati ng a storm s ew er and water l i n e easement a nd gr ant ing an easement for a new water line in the Ci nder ella City parking lot. (Copies enclosed.) (j) Ordinance approving an agreement between the City of Englewood, Colorado, and the Arapahoe Regional Library District and approving Addendum thereto for establishment of the APAL Book Fund to better library services to citizens of Englewood and the County. (Copies enclosed.) Public Hearing. Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions. (a) Bill vacating a storm sewer and water line ease ment a nd granting an easement for a new water line in the Cinderella City parking lot. (Copies enclosed.) • I • • -• • • Con s ent Agenda Page 3 October 1, 1984 11. Ordinances, Resolutions and Motion s (continued) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) (g) (h ) (i) ( j) Council Communication recommending adopting Bill for Ordinance approving an amending agreement between the City of Englewood and the Englewood Housing Authority for admini s tration of the Home Rehabilitation Program. (C ouncil Comm uni cation and Bill enclosed.) Counci l Commun icatio n fro m the Water and Se we r Board recommending approval by Council o f th e annexation of Rancho Supplement No. 3. (C op ies e nclosed.) Council Communi c ation from Wat e r and Se wer Board re c ommending approval b y Co un ci l of th e annexation of Rancho Supplement No. 4. (C opies enclosed .) Council Communication from Water and Sewer Board r ecom mending approval by Council of the annexation o f Southgate Supplement No. 101. (C opie s e n close d.) Coun cil Communication from Water and Sewer Board re com me ndin g approval by Council of the annexation of Sou th ga t e Supplement No . 102. (C opi es e n closed.) Council Communication from Planning and Zo nin g Co mmis sio n rec ommendin g approval of the 1985 -8 6 Highway Work Prog r a m. (C opie s enclosed.) Council Co mmun ication fr om the Planning and Zo ning Commission recommending approval of the amended "Broadway Planned Development." (Copies enclosed.) Resolution determining the Rules of Order and Procedure governing meetings of the City Council of the City of Englewood. (Copies enclosed.) (k) Council Co mmun ica t ion from City Manager recommending award of bid for Recreation Center Trees. (Copies enclosed .) (1) Council Communication from City Manager recommending award of bid for Englewood Recreation Center Land- scape Material s. (Copies enclosed.) • • I • - Consent Agenda Page 4 October 1, 1984 12. City Manager Report. 13. City Attorney Report. 14. General Discus sion . (a) Mayor's Choice. (b) Council Member's 15. Adjournment, • • • Choice, I • • • - • • AGENDA ITEM -----PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlgday _Nul Vobe1da _Wei s t 81~ Bradshaw Ot i s MOTION: I . • • • • • AGENDA ITEM --4--..:jtli:-..!... __ PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded AbstaIn Hlgd•y ~ .• -:vobe1da Weist >< a1ro v Br•dsh.w Otis MOTION: JU I • • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM I ( b l --~--PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Abstain ~ -"...!..!l..!!.'!.t Nea_!_ -'i2hltlda .c.. We_!_st ....D_il.Q. Bradshaw Otis MOTION: D I • • • • • - • .. • AGENDA ITEM _..!.l _f_b~l-PRESENTED BY -------- Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlg<lay v. Neal vobeida y Weist Bllo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: II '' f\.D I • • • • • AGEND A ITEM PRESENTED BY ----------- 0 f ROLL CALL Moved Seconded A yes Nay Absent Abstain KTQday Mea Vobe,da Weist Bll<> Bradsh- I Otis MOTION: I . • • • - • • AGENDA >TEH ~ PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Abstain HrgGay I >I' Neal \ Vobeida \ We-Ist \ Bllo X. Bradshaw I Ot is MOTION: • I • • • • • - • • -- AGENDA ITEM -----PRESENTED BY ------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Abstain HIQ<Iay ,)( Neal ·vobeida WeTst Rll<> v Bradshaw Otis MOTION: \>r &~ {;. frr-~J~u~ ""2_\-l-( • I ( p( CIA ;. t; I uJv.~ :-• • I' j \ • II , ) ~·t ~, • • • - • • AGENDA ITEM -~rf:~_::::::.~ PRESENTED BY ------- u~~ r~v.r ( ~ l~ r".l ,(~r s.;~) 'l ]?, c , 'vt' ft< ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Abstain IITQOay Nea Vobejda We-Tst Bllo Bradshaw Otis MariON: I • • • • • - • • • • • AG ENDA ITEM -~=:....__ __ PRESENTED BY ------- ( . ~ c~ .. ?'~ y};H (t ~~ .,_ . -t "~, rt ~«.-9J _ lL-~..u l· uti 1- t rur,(t., •. u_:-).1 .. ~ "-nffl CALL , ( -r { ~' ~ ~1' 'f.(· ... Hu ~.4il -1 I Moved MOTION: I l't... ""~ v 0 ~A< .:.<-'-<A '.I.V -/.1....!! ( .....u 7.-- Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Hlgday Neal Vo b eida Weist Bllo Bradshaw Otis 'S .. f 'I l{)' I (;, ( )'i\~ .. • Abstain I • • • • - • • AGEN DA ITEM _.:::S:._ __ PRESENTED BY -------- [ r --' v _., 01/.Ar't... ... ., _ ! Y·'"""'l •. 1 I--~I)~< v f 1'\~l-/ Lv-._. ~' <,-.r- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hladav Neal vobeida Weist A Bl lo X Bradshaw I Otis I MOTION: 1 • , ( r •• • • I • • • • • • AG ENDA ITEM P RESENTED BY ------- I ~ ... ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain l( "IQCiay Neal Vob eida WeTst >( Rl lo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: I . • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM -----PRESENTED BY-------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain X.. HlgCiay X: Neal Vobeida Weist Bllo Bradshaw I Otis MOTION: I • • • • • • - AGENDA ITEM -----PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain __6::: Hlq<lav Neal Vobeida Weist Bllo ~ Bradshaw Otis MOTION: r I • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM ----------PRESENTED BY ----------------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain / X H1g<1av Neal ~ Vobeida Weist Bllo Bradshaw Otis I MOTION: I • • I • • • • • PRESENTED BY ------- ) r ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain RHiday Neal Vnbe;da Weist ~ 8110 X" Bradshaw Otis MOTION: ('-)r~ I L'~ H -~. ... ( QA_... I '--!) t'-"...........--~ I • 'IJ • I ~ l • • • • • AGEN DA ITEM ~ PRESENTED BY -------- (14 l' 'l.. ( -v ~ "r~ T s· u .; ;: ~~ i / ~-,. IJ ,;;. " [ ,J ( 11 ;.. ,ar 1 (~1L. ~ ~ I '. I..._. (\.~ ' rl _,"" c.. +-< a.u -..f;,.'¥j(.,(_(••l-~~f I 1-. n ROLL CALL ' -' I I ''v' . . .,../ t) 11 . -~-v-~ Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain lffqelay v Neal Vobe1da We st X Rllo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: ~ r .:t'~. ;, j. ""'""'' "''( ~I (>. . c~wrr (1.' ~ 1.1-/ t< (.........._ .0.__._ ~~ I 0~·~ E(.A..~ ......_, ).~-.(...,!._ ... ><..-. • )-.. , (. c ~ .. 1 A.~ -0 ~.,. I • • • - • • AGENDA ITEM _]""'_.!..-::(L:>..:,___ PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain HI gday Neal -y Vo be;da Weist Iiiio y Bradshaw Otis MOTION: r • I • • • • • • - • • AGENDA ITEM ----------P RES ENTED BY --------------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlqday Neal X vobei da Weist Bllo X Bradshaw Otis MOTION: • I • • • • • • • AGEND A ITEM PRESENTED BY -------- ROll CAll Moved Seconded Abstain .><;., "lgoay T Neal I X Vobeida I Weist Bllo Bradshaw Otis I • • • • • AGENDA ITEM _/__;._b __ _ Moved Seconded "liTQOiY )( --x MOTION: Neal Vobi'lda Weist Bllo Bradshaw Otis I 1.-- • • • PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Ayes Nay Absent AbstaIn I • • • • - • • AGEN DA ITEM __ l...L..-"'~~-PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes May Absent Abstain rHCfdiv T Meal Vobeida Weist X. Bllo X Bradshaw Otis \ MOTION: tl • I . • • • • • AGENDA I TEM ~ PRESENTED BY ------- r~~~ ,uJJ r)<~»)t t hct, -- ROLL CALL Abstain Moved Seconded Hlgday I )< Meal vobe1da WeTs t Bl lo X Bradshaw I Ot i s MOTION: I . • • • • • AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED !3'! ------- (l I (; () l I v {I '7 .. "' ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain / t11gCI~ Neal Vobeida Weist ~ Bl k> Bradshaw Otis MOTION: l "' • I • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Abstain ~ay_ X Neal I Vobeida I Weist Silo X Bradsh- Otis 1 \ MOI'ION: I . • • • • • AG ENDA ITEM -~~~!::::J __ PRES ENTE D BY -------- ;) ( ''" l ~ -1 ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlgday Neal Vobe i da Weist Bilo Bradshaw Otis MOTION: I • • • • • • • AGENDA I TEM PRESENTED BY -------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain I , Hlqdav Neal Vo beida )( ~ k Weist Bi lo v X Bradshaw '\ Ot i s \ MCYriON: I .,. ~, f ''l 't t./ .:."" .... » J)~ v L._~ v< t . { L.. '> ;-r I I , '/ ) • • • • • • • AGENDA ITEM ----------PRESENTED BY ---------------- RO LL CALL Moved Seconded Abstain HIQdav Neal Vobeida X Weist Biio v Bradshaw \ Otis Yb r MOTION: ,_,, (' .... -c.·c· c) ,_...,.._ j c~ k.-l_. -~ .r-{f_ ·....v-~L ~ I • • \.... ( ( J \) ~ p ( P-'1 A _)_ 'i.-- • • AGENDA I TEM ---- Moved Seconded Hlgday Neal Vo beida Weist Bl lo Bradshaw Otis MCYI'ION: • ROLL CALL • • • P RESENTED BY ------- Ayes Nay Absent • l' l . Abstain I . • - I • ( • REGULAR MEETING: • • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS City of Englewood, Colorado September 17, 1984 j(J_ The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, met in regular session on September 17, 1984, at 7:30p.m. Mayor Otis, presiding, called the meeting to order. The invocation was given by Reverend Adrian House, First Christian Church, 3190 South Grant Street. The pledge of allegiance was led by Boy Scout Troop 192. Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Absent: None. The Mayor declared a quorum present. * * * * * * * Also present were: Acting City Manager Holmes City Attorney Olsen Fire Chief Broman Deputy City Clerk Owen * * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF AUGUST 27, 1984. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Weist. The Mayor declared the motion carried • * * * * * * * • I • { ( • • September 17, 1984 Page 2 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 4, 1984. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Council Members Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Otis. None. Council Members Higday, Bradshaw. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw stated she was absent from the September 4th meeting because of a school appointment. * * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO BRING FORWARD AGENDA ITEM 6B, A PROCLAMATION CONCERNING HUNTING AND FISHING. Council Member Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROCLAMATION DECLARING SEPTEMBER 22, 1984 AS "HUNTING AND FISHING DAY." Council Member Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Mr. Walter Samuelson, 3855 South Lincoln Street, was present and accepted the proclamat ion with appreciation. * * * * * * * There were no other visitors at this time • I • • - ' September 17, 1984 Page 3 * * • • • • • • • • "Communications -No Action Recommended" on the agenda were: (a) (b) (c) Minutes of the Urban Renewal Authority meetings of August 1 and 8, 1984. Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of August 21, 1984. Memorandum from the Assistant Director of URA to the Executive Director of URA concerning his attendance at the ALI-ABA Eminent Domain Conference in San Diego, CA. COUNCIL MEMBER WEIST MOVED TO ACCEPT "COMMUNICATIONS -NO ACTION RECOMMENDED" AGENDA ITEMS S(A) -5(C). Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * • * COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW DECLARING OCTOBER 7 -13, 1984 AS Member Neal seconded the motion. resulted as follows: • * • * MOVED TO APPROVE A PROCLAMATION "ALCOHOL AWARENESS WEEK." Council Upon a call of the roll, the vote Ayes: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Nays: None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 40 SERIES OF 1984 • * • * * * BY AUTHORITY * COUNCIL BILL NO. 38 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL • ~~--------------~~----~~--------~~1 0 I • • - • (I • September 17, 1984 Page 4 • • • AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO THE SOUTHWEST CHERRY HILLS WATER DISTRICT, A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A WATER CONDUIT THROUGH THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 38, SERIES OF 1984, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 41 SERIES OF 1984 * * * * BY AUTHORITY * * * COUNCIL BILL NO. 41 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BILO AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A LEASE BETWEEN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO, AND THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, FOR ROOM 16 AT MADDOX SCHOOL TO BE USED AS A SMALL NATURE CENTER. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 41, SERIES OF 1984, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Weist seconded the motion. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw stated she would be abstaining from the vote on the basis of her employment with the School District. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Otis. None. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * • BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. 42 COUNCIL BILL NO. 40 • I • - \ • (f • September 17, 1984 Page 5 SERIES OF 1984 • • • INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BILO AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A PERMANENT EASEMENT TO MOUNTAIN STATES TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY FOR INSTALLATION OF TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT AT ENGLEWOOD RECREATION CENTER AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 40, SERIES OF 1984, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Vobejda seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobe j da, We i st , Bi lo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1984 * * * * BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR * * * COUNC I L BILL NO. 4 3 INTRODUCED BY COUNC I L MEMBER VOBEJDA AN ORDINANCE VACATING A STORM SEWER AND WATER LINE EASEMENT AND GRANTING AN EASEMENT FOR A NEW WATER LINE IN THE CINDERELLA CITY PARKING LOT. COUNCIL MEMBER VOBEJDA MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 43, SERIES OF 1984, ON FIRST READING. Council Memb e r Nea l seconded the mot i on. Upon a call of the rol l , t h e v o te re s ulted as f ollows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda , Weist, Bilo , Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Council Member Neal requested a map outlining the subject easement prior to second reading • * * * * * * * BY AUTHORITY • I • - (I • September 17, 1984 Page 6 ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1984 • • • A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 44 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AND THE ARAPAHOE REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT AND APPROVING ADDENDUM THERETO FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APAL BOOK FUND TO BETTER LIBRARY SERVICES TO CITIZENS OF ENGLEWOOD AND THE COUNTY. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 44, SERIES OF 1984, ON FIRST READING. Council Member Silo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 34 SERIES OF 1984 * * * * * * * A RESOLUTION APPOINTING NANCY N. REID, ESQ. ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 34, SERIES OF 1984. Council Member Weist seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the mo ti on ca rr i ed. RESOLUTION NO. 35 SERIES OF 1984 * * * * * * * A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1984 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND TO TRANSFER FUNDS TO THE ENGLEWOOD URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY FOR REMOVAL OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY SUBSTATION AT LI TTLE DRY CREEK ON EAST SIDE OF BROADWAY IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. • I • • • • .. September 17, 1984 \ Page 7 • • COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 35, SERIES OF 1984. Council Member Higday seconded the motion. Council Member Neal stated he requested the resolution. Mr. Neal explained the Urban Renewal Authority has agreed to go along with Public Service on this project, and could realize a net savings on its bond issue. Mr. Neal stated he felt this was the kind of project involving Little Dry Creek and the downtown program that was primarily oriented to not only the "bricks and mortar"; but also highly targeted to the aesthetics and final look of Little Dry Creek. Mr. Neal stated he thought this was the kind of project that Council might like to participate in. Council Member Bilo stated even though he agreed with Council Member Neal he opposed the resolution on the basis that it was offered under such short notice. Mr. Silo wanted additional time to think about the matter. Council Member Higday asked Council Member Neal if the Engineering Department projected a net savings of $15,000 if $170,000 was expended now to change the design in the channel. Council Member Neal stated to the total project, yes. Council Member Bilo stated his point was that the URA has already approved this project as one of its own. The City was being asked to subsidize the URA and it should not be done in an emergency situation. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobe jda , Weist, Bradshaw, Otis. Council Member Silo. The Mayor declared the motion carried. • * • * * • • Fire Chief Broman presented a Council Communication concerning a bid award for the purchase of a fire pumper. Chief Broman requested an increase in the purchase price for the procurement of optional equipment, and he explained the options would upgrade the equipment for safety and maintenance care which ultimately prolongs the life of the equipment. Chief Broman stated by adding the cost of the options the purchase price would be $143,760 which was still the lowest in competitive bids • • I • • • • • • September 17, 1984 Page 8 COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO APPROVE THE AWARD OF BID TO AMERICAN FIRE PREVENTION, INC IN THE AMOUNT OF $143,760 FOR ONE PETER PIRSCH CUSTOM FIRE PUMPER. Council Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Silo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis reappointed Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw to the Housing Authority to the term expiring July 1, 1989. * * * * * * * Council Member Neal requested the vacancy on the EDDA remain open. * * * * * * * Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw expressed appreciation to Council for permitting her to attend the NLC in San Antonio, Texas September 14 -15, 1984. * * * * * * * Council Member Higday extended good luck wishes to Linda Roberts of the Littleton Independent on her new assignment to the Denver Post. * * * * * * * No further business was discussed. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN. Mayor Otis adjourned the meeting without a vote at 8:00 p.m • • I • • • SPECIAL MEETING: • • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS C ity of Englewood, Colorado September 24, 1984 /b The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, met in special session on September 24, 1984, at 7:30 p.m. Mayor Otis, presiding, called the meeting to order. The invocation was given by Council Member Higday. The pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Otis. Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weis t , Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Absent: None. The Mayor dec lared a quorum present • • • • • • • • Also present were: City Manager McC own Ass i stan t City Manager Vargas City Attorney Olsen Deputy City Clerk OWen • • • • • • • Mayor Otis stated the purpose of the 1985 budget public hearing was to receive citizen i nput. Mayor Ot i s stated no tice of the hear i ng was published i n the local newspaper on September 5, 1 984. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 1985 BUDGET. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. • I • • - ... "' • • • • September 24, 1 984 Pa ge 2 City Manager McCown stated the proposed 1985 budget was transmitted two weeks ago of which a detailed review was planned at the budget retreat. Mr. McCown asked Assistant C ity Manager Vargas to present the overall budget in summary form • Assistant City Manager Vargas stated the 1985 budget was being presented with no tax increases. Total expend i tures were proposed at $31,879,965 and total revenues at $37,528,246. Mr. Vargas reported four new positions were being proposed, a part time clerk typist at the Ser vi center, a deputy city clerk, and two custodians for the recreat ion center. Two new programs for 1985 were a phys ic al fitness program for the Fire Department, and a tree p lanting program through Parks and Recreation. Mr. Vargas further reported a stable condition ex i sted i n the enterprise funds. Assistant City Manager Vargas entered the following requests for 1 985 funding assistance: l. 2. 3. 4. 5. Inter-Fa ith Task Force Arapahoe Mental Health Center, Inc Arapahoe House City of Englewood Chamber of Commerce League of Women Voters of Arapahoe County City Manager McCown entered a Commun ication from the Parks and Recreation Comm i ss i on recommending a subs i dy of $100,000 be granted to the South Suburban Park Foundat i on for construction of South Platte River hike and bike trail. Mr. McCown further informed Council he has received i nqu i rying calls on whether or not the Senior Surrey would be continued for 1985. Mr. McCown noted the program does not appear i n the 1985 budget. Mayor Otis a sked if there was anyone i n the audience wi shing to speak to Council on the 1985 budget. Sidney White, 4760 South Jason , appeared before Council. Mr. White introduced himself as one of the original charter members. He congratulated Council on their dutiful performance . Mr. White queried spending money for a new city hall when recovery of the present building would not provide for a new building. Mr. White suggested keeping the old building and relocating some of the city departments to provide more space. There were other citizens in the audience to speak. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw noted on page 64 of the General Fund under capital outlay for the senior citizen recreation center, the Malley Center Trust Fund Committee has proposed that it buy this item. Hs • I • • c • Sep t ember 24, 1984 Page 3 • • • Bradshaw stated a recommendation would be forthcoming at either the Council meeting on October 1st or 15th. There were no further comments. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis . None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * • * * * COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING 1985 GENERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, We i st, Bilo, Bradshaw, Ot i s. None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. Mayor Ot i s stated not ic e of the hearing was published i n the local newspaper September 5, 1984. Ass istant City Manager Vargas stated the City would probably receive $625,968 in general revenue sharing funds in 1985. Mr. Vargas stated these monies are used to offset salaries in the Pol ice Department . Council Member Neal inquired about the handicapped requirements recently incorporated in the regulations for use of these funds. Mr. Vargas stated so far the requirements refer to public notification which the City has complied with through the means of several media. There were no other comments. I • - • ( • September 24, 1984 Page 4 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Council Members Higday, Neal, Vobejda, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Nays: None. The Mayor declared the motion carried • • • * • • • • There was no further discussion which is prohibited by special meeting status. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN. Mayor Otis adjourned the meeting without a vote at 7:55 p.m • • I • • ... "' / • • - THE ARAPAHOE GREENWAY Ph .. Two : The South Pinta River -Hampden to Bellevi- The South Suburbln Park Foundation, Inc. • I . THE SOUTH SUBURBAN PARK FOUNDATION 6315 South University Boulevwd Littlfton, Coloredo 80121 (303) 788-2483 or (303) 784-5074 • • • I . • • • • - • The Arapahoe Greenway • Project Oetcription and Cost Estimates • About the Foundation I • • • The Foundat ion Board of Trustees • Listing of Contributors to the 1983-84 Campaign • - THE ARAPAHOE GREENWAY "The highway of empire and the lifeblood of a continent!" That is how James Michener described the South Platte River in his bestselling novel Centennial. Once the focal point of a beautiful high plains valley, the river bore the brunt of man's progress . In a few short decades the Platte had become hardly more than a sewer lined with railroads, junk yards, and utility lines. It was the sorriest, most blighted sector-a dumping ground and back alley to a booming metropolis. Now this is all changing! Denver has recently completed its nationally acclaimed 10-mile, $12 million Platte River Greenway running from city limit to cit y limit. And now, the South Suburban Park Foundation is pleased to announce the completion of its $420,000 Pilot Project! This high quality river restoration effort now extends the Platte Greenway from the Denver city limit at Bates Avenue to Hampden Avenue . At Hampden, a newly completed seg- ment of trail continues along the west bank of the Platte to Bear Creek, forming the "Colorado Greenway." This amenity developed by the Colorado Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation provides trail connections to Southwest Denver and Lakewood via Bear Creek and Sanderson Gulch. In addition to these current improvements, a number of other stunning transformations are taking place along the Platte in Arapahoe County . Englewood has completed a new 18-hole golf course and club house along the banks of the Platte between Bear Creek and Oxford Avenue . A riparian natural area has been set aside near the confluence with Bear Creek offering future generations an oppor- tunity to see the Platte as it was in more pristine times. South of Oxford, the U.S . Army Corps of Engineers is channelizing the Platte . The improvements will permit new mixed-use development along the river in Littleton including new residents, restaurants, offices and cultural facilities . South of Coal Mine Road the Platte and over 600 acres of flood plain have been permanently set aside as a Flood Plain Park-a place where the river will remain in its natural state. Sound exciting? We think it is! We also think the process by which the river is being returned to the people of our community is unique. The process involves the creation of a public sector/private sector partnership to fund the Greenway . In an era of cutbacks on government spending, projects like the Arapahoe Greenway require the commitment of all segments of the community . Our 1983·84 Pilot Project (Bates Avenue to Hampden Avenue) proved that this could be done. Fueled with a $125,000 challenge grant from the Gates Foundation, the South Suburban Park Foundation was able to ra ise an add itional $295,000 from both private and public donors. Twelve municipal and quas i-municipal entities as well as over 100 businesses and individuals contributed . The effort transcended community boundaries. Several communities, not even fronting the river , gave funds. They saw the county-wide and metro-wide value of the Arapahoe Greenway . Support for the project was v irtually unanimous in all the communities we approached . This year we're back at it again . Our ultimate goal is to extend the Greenway to the Chatfield State Recreation Area w ith a continuous paved hike/bike path , riverbank cleanup and landscaping, parks, feature areas and boating/fishing improvements. Our immediate objective is to raise $791 ,750. This money w ill be used to extend the Greenway from Hampden to Belleview . • I • • • - With over 1000 people per week moving into the metro area and many more joining the ranks of Front Range Coloradoans, the people of Arapahoe County have set out to preserve the Platte as a valuable part of our heritage. Transforming the river is a wise investment in our future-already paying off with exciting new public and private development as well as preservation along the Platte. The Arapahoe Greenway project is now underway! But, to continue this worthy effort, we need your help! BENEFITS OF THE GREENWAY: • Close-in Recreation & Tourism • Community Health & Fitness • Flood Channel Management • Quality Urban Redevelopment • Restoration & Preservation of the Natural Environment • Interpretive Education • Source of Community Pride 2 • I • • I • - THE ARAPAHOE GREENWAY-PHASE TWO TRAIL CONNECTION FROM HAMPDEN TO BELLEVIEW The Phase Two project will extend the existing Platte River Greenway system an additional 2 .1 miles, effectively linking downtown Denver to Littleton! Presently , the Arapahoe County ponion of the Greenway extends just over one mile into the cities of Englewood and Sheridan via the recently completed Bates to Hampden trail connection. To continue the PlatteR iver trail southward, an attractive pedestrian span will be con· structed roughly 1200 feet south of Hamp · den . The trail will cross the Platte and con· tinue along the east bank through the Englewood Golf Course. The trail will again cross the river on an existing pedestrian bridge just nonh of Oxford. From here the trail will run along the west bank of the river to Belleview. This new segment of trail will represent a significant step toward the South Suburban Park Foundation's ultimate goal of a con· tinuous Arapahoe Greenway following the Platte to Littleton's South Platte Park and the Chatfield State Recreation Area . The proposed Phase Two trail segment will pass through the cities of Englewood, Sheridan, unincorporated Arapahoe County as well as Littleton . In addit ion to extend ing the Greenway sys- tem, the trail will offer a number of unique features and amenities. The trail will provide the people of Littleton and southern Arapa· hoe County with d irect access to the Denver Greenway as well as the Bear Creek trail. It will also provide the communities to the nonh w ith access to Li ttleton. The trail will feature a nature preserve near the conflu ence with Bear Creek, a rest stop/ interpretive center in the old Englewood Golf Course club house near Oxford, access to an expanded Centenn ial Park near Union, and access to new commercial, residential and retail development at Belleview. The trail improvements will feature the same high qual ity design standards as the dartmouth hampdan ox lor un on belleview 3 • N I • • ~ i 0 I Miles • • • recently completed Bates to Hampden trail. These inc lude an e ight-foot-wide , warm tone conc rete path, natural rock riverbank stabilization, restoration of the river channel, attractive rest areas, safety handrail ing (where needed), and landscaping along the edges of the path. In add it ion to a 275-foot wood and "Cor-Ten" steel bridge spanning the Platte, Phase Two will also include a park ing/ access point at Oxford. Funding for the project will come from a number of sources including the Colorado State Trails Program and the U-S. Army Corps of Engineers_ We are turning to the communities of Arapahoe County and private sector donors for the balance of the funds necessary to complete the effort. An itemized budget is presented below: ITEMIZED BUDGET FOR PHASE TWO TRAIL (HAMPDEN TO BELLEVIEW) 1. River Cleanup 2. Pedestrian Span (275') 3 . B'-wide Concrete Path (11,300') 4. Grading/Native landscaping/Sprinklers 5 . Rock Rip Rap (at Hampden, Oxford, Union and Belleview) 6. Underpasses at Oxford and Union 7. Culverts and Drainage B. Security Fencing (at golf course and concrete plant) 9 . Parking/Access Area at Oxford 10. Bike Rest Areas (Benches and Bike Rack, 2) 11 . Pedestrian Safety Rail (at Hampden, Oxford and Union) 12. Signage (10signs) Construction Subtotal Plus 5% Contingency Plus Engineering, Planning and Administration Total Project Budget • by Corps of Engineers $225,000 226,000 35,000 23,000 24,000 20,000 38,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 4,000 $635,000 31,750 125,000 $791,750 I • • - ABOUT THE SOUTH SUBURBAN PARK FOUNDATION The South Suburban Park Foundation was established in 1979 to enrich the environment and improve open space and recreational amenities for residents in the South Suburban communities of metropolitan Denver. The Foundation serves as a means for private citizens to contribute either funds or volunteer efforts toward shared community objectives. As a tax exempt, non -profit corpo· ration , donations to the Foundation are deductible as charitable contributions. Your support of the South Suburban Park Foundation will help to enhance the quality of life and have a positive impact on our local fam ilies, neighborhoods and communities. The Foundation is committed this year to the Arapahoe Greenway-Phase Two, a continuation of the South Platte R iver Greenway into our communities. We have completed construction of the "South Suburban Connection" (Bates to Hampden Avenues) and intend to work in cooperation with the communities of Arapahoe County until the Greenway extends along the South Platte River from Denver to the Chatfield State Recreation Area . 5 • I - • SOUTH SUBURBAN PARK FOUNDATION BOARD OF TRUSTEES AUTUMN 1984 Mary Carter, Chairman Mayor, City of Bow Mar 5201 Bow Mar Drive Littleton, Colorado 80123 794 -5074 Ann Feeney, First Vice Chairman Executive Editor, Independent Newspapers 5812 South Laurel Place Littleton, Colorado 80123 795-5854 Chuck Stroh, Treasurer Vice President for Marketing, Cherry Creek National Bank 2988 East Euclid Place Littleton, Colorado 80121 798-4239 John Knutson , Second Vice Chairman Vice President, Operations Cooley Gravel Company 9285 North Clermont Thornton, Colorado 80229 795-7930 Maura Collins, Secretary Real Estate Owner and Manager 4541 Sumac lane Littleton, Colorado 80123 794-8282 6 • • - Beverly Bradshaw Mayor ProTem, City of Englewood 2910 South Marion Street Englewood, Colorado 80110 789-2407 Steve Knowlton Co-owner, Cafe Kandahar 7 Cimarron Drive Littleton, Colorado 80121 789-0676 Ann M . Polumbus Member of Council, Cherry Hills Village 4590 South Downing Circle Englewood , Colorado 80110 761 -8196 Jack Ross President, Saunders, Snyder, Ross and Dickson, P.C . 5275 Bow Mar Drive Littleton, Colorado 80123 794-4167 Dewllopment ConsultMt: Robert Seams Urban Edges 1624 Humboldt Denver, Colorado 80218 837-0118 • I . - The first phase of the Arapahoe Greenway is now complete extending from the Denver cit y l i m i t at Bates Avenue to Hampden Avenue. This project proved that the public/private partnership approach can work. Transforming the Platte River corridor through Arapahoe County from an eyesore to an asset is a wise investment in our future, already paying off in new recreation facl'lities and quality development. 7 I - LISTING OF CONTRIBUTORS TO THE 1983·84 CAMPAIGN PUBLIC SECTOR CONTRIBUTORS City of Englewood ; The South Suburban Metropolitan Recreation & Park District; Arapahoe County; The Denver Urban Drainage & Flood Control District; City of Littleton; City of Sheridan ; Cherry Hills Village ; Greenwood Village; City of Glendale; Town of Bow Mar; Columbine Valley; Leawood Recreation District ; City of Denver; Colorado Lottery Conservation Trust Allocation FOUNDATION CONTRIBUTORS The Gates Foundation (the prime sponsor with a $125,000 Challenge Grant); The Denver Founda· tion; The Union Pacific Foundation; The Colorado Open Land Foundation (in memory of Bart Hoag and his work in furthering the Greenway) BUSINESS & INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTORS Patron Sponsors Bingo King ; United Bank of Littleton ;Castlewood Investment ; Cooley Gravel; King Soopers; Osprey Properties ; Talley Corporation ; Writer Corporation Sponsors Petroleum I nfonnation Corp .; Southwest Properties; Bow Mar Gardeners ; Lakes 0' Bow Mar Garden Club; William T . & Jean Easley; American Express; Brook ridge Shopping Center; Brad Bradford Auto Body; Burt Chevrolet ; Colorado National Bank; C & C Auto Sales; D & D Sales; Denver Marble Co .; Empire Savings; First Bank of the Denver Technical Center, N.A.; First Interstate of Englewood ; First National Bank of Englewood ; Getty Oil Co.; Jim Gammon & Assoc .; Jones lntercable ; KWGN Television, Channel 2 ; Kellogg Corp .; Lankford & Assoc.; Long & Assoc .; McMartin, Burke, Loser & Fitzgerald ; Mission Viejo Co.; Modern Plastics; Platte River Properties Ltd .; Sterling Stainless Tube Co .; Sundeco Coal Co .; United Cable T .V. of Colorado Contributors Academy Cleaners ; Ball Metal Container Corp .; Bear Sales & Service; Blue Sky Cleaning; Bosley's TV & Radio Repair ; Carder Concrete Products; Cordle & Co . CPA's; Deluxe Check Printers; Denver Consumers Ltd.; The First Edition Ltd .; First Engineering Development Corp.; Hamilton Brothers Oil Corp.; Hanifen, Imhoff, Inc .; High Country Retail ; Hopp's Auto Body; Howard Electrical & Mechanical Inc.; Jade Garden Restaurant ; Kennedy & Mitchell ; Lautenbach Agency ; Lowrey's Meat Division of Beatrice Foods Co .; Mclaughlin Engineering Consultants International ; Metro Components; Mobil Oil Co.; D.F. Oatley & Associates ; Over-Lowe Co.; PPG Industries; PRC Engi · neering; Patterson Hardware; Pentax Corp.; Platte River Properties; Ragsdale Bros. Inc .; Riely Furniture Co .; Rob Roy Construction Co .; Fred B. Rothman & Co .; Ralph Schomp's Oldsmobile/ Honda ; Shorty'sConoco Service; Spinning Wheel ; Sundeco Energy Development Co.; Syn Com Ltd .; TMCO ; Williams Concrete Construction Co .; Windows West; Woodlawn Shopping Center; Woodman Brothers, Inc . Libby Bortz ; Jack & Mary Carter; Ralph Cole ; Laurence & Jeanette Currier; Robert & Ann Feeney; Sam & Talie Freedman ; Arthur Garfein; Robert Gow; Melanie Grant; Mrs. George Keeley ; Richard & Lucretia Koeppe; George Kreye; Sam Langstaff; Alan Lowe; Ronald Loser; David B. & Janet D. MacKenzie; T . Magee ; Drs. Morrell, Needham & Nichelson ; Brian Pendleton; F . Silverman; Robert & Phoebe Smedley; Raymond C. & Carol Vojir 8 • I • • • • • Englewood Parks and Recreation Ccmnission Minutes of July 12, 1984 After a ride on the Lions Club Miniature Train at Belleview Park to view the recently coopleted renovation of the train track bed, and a tour of a portion of the Ile!lDnstration Trail along Bear Creek , the regular llU!lthly ueeting of the Englewood Parks and Recreation Ccmnission was called to order at 6 :25 p .m. by Olainnan Poole at the Englewood M.Jnicipal Golf Course Clubhouse. Me!Ders present : Allen, Board:nan, Bradshaw, Ganes, Hi.gday, Hixon, Poole, Radanacher, Ra:nans, ex officio Melli>ers absent : Howard Also present : Leon Kuhn, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation Ikn.lg Foe, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation Ken Ballard, Recreation Supervisor Andy M:CcMl, City Manager 01airman Poole asked if there -were any additions or corrections to the minutes of June 14, 1984. 'nlere -were none. A llDtion was made and seconded that the minutes be ,.rapproved as presented. 1be llDtion passed . Director Ra:nans distriruted a ca11>arison sheet to Ccmnissioo tiiE!Ibers illustrating the present golf course fees, reccmnendations of the Golf Pro, City Manager, Assistant City Manager and Parks and Recreation Cc:mni.ssioo, and City C'.otalcil' s actioo on the Ccmnission' s reccmnendation regarding golf course fee increases . RaDans explained that City C'.otalcil agreed with the Ccmnission' s reccmnendations on fee increases except they retained the current fee of $6.75 for 18 hole residents and $4.50 for 18 hole senior residents. 01airman Poole read a letter he received fran the President of the Englewood School Board ~ stated that the Ccmnissioo' s reccmnendation to reinstate elementary and middle school swim prograns will be given full coosideration by the School Board . 'nle letter stated that the Board has asked the City/School Ccmn:l.ttee to explore sane alternatives for expanding after-school swimning prograns. Director Ra:nans distriruted copies of the latest draft of the Joint Recreatioo Agree- ' ll8lt between the City and Schools coocerning the City's use of the high school pool 'When the recreatioo center is caq:>leted in January, 1985. Ranans stated that the City/School • I • • -• • • Engl~ Parks and Recreation Ccmnission Minutes of July 12, 1984 Page -2- mmittee had agreed that the school will receive payment fran the City for use of the high school pool based on a fornula that produces a 100'1. recovery rate for adult programs and 25'7. recovery rate for youth programs. After Ul.ICh discussion, Camd.ssicner Higday made a IIDtion, seconded by Ccmni.ssioner Allm, that a reccmnendation be made to City CDuncil to approve the Joint Recreation Agreenent on the Engl~ High School swimning pool. The IIDtion passed with one dissenting vote fran Ccmni.ssioner Board:nan. Concerning the Detmtion Pond ballfields, Director Ranans reported that it was deter- mined at a meeting last -week with Leon l<llhn, Assistant Director of Parks and Recreation, Gary Diede, Director of Engineering Services , and Densel Ragland, Civil Engineer, that the fields are now playable. Ranans reported that several Engl~ ball teans have now been transferred to the new Detmtion Pond fields fran Miller Field but that the City is waiting for approval fran Roscoe Davidson, Superintendent of rngl~ Sch:x>ls, before the \ng1~ Redbirds are transferred to the field . Ranans reported that during a meeting with Leon l<llhn, Jim Phillipe, Director of Property Services for Englei«X>d Schools , and himself, Phillipe suggested that the Detmtion Pond be considered a city park and tumed over to the City for maintenance . Director Ranans stated that similar to the high school pool, the area was not designed as a park and con- siderable changes \laJUld have to be made in order for the area to offer park facility services . Ccmni.ssioner Boaranan stated that tw> weeks ago, a water pipe broke aloog the drip line feed for the trees along Clarkson St. and a school maintenance Sll>loyee stated that the systan's fittings are pressure-fitted and he dicn't believe there were any expansion valves to prevent the camecti.cns fran popping loose. Assistant Director Ku1n stated there is no dol.n strean relief valve and the systan was designed so that there 'WUld not be enough pressure to cause this problan. Ku1n stated he 'WOuld check into the matter . Ccmnissi.oner Boarcinan stated that water collects in the northeast comer of the det- f mtion pond. Ku1n reported that Densel Ragland of the Engineering office is calling sane- one in to take care of that problan . • • I • • • • • • Englewood Parks and Recreation Camri.ssion Minutes of July 12, 1984 Page -3- Catm:issioner Boarcknan stated that the detention pond looks very good with exception to the diseased area . Kuhn reported that fungicide has been applied twice and believes the disease is now under control. Boaramn asked if a gate and fence could be put up at the ~t end of the detention pond to seal off that entrance in an atterpt to prevent cars fran entering and driving on the turf. Kuhn reported the area around that entrance will be developed with grass and a bike trail, and that Densel Ragland plans to install a tenporary barricade, wh:i.ch will be replaced with a permanent gate when the area is cooplete. Catm:issioner Boaranan inquired about an article that appeared in the Englewood Sentinel newspaper ~ein it stated that bleachers may be added to the Detention Pond along the 3rd and 1st base lines. He asked if there ~d be proble:ns in the event the bleachers ~e installed witlnut a pad. Assistant Director Kuhn informed him that a base material should be put down to prevent problems fran occurring. Kuhn stated he didn't believe • , there is space enough between the slope and flat section for bleachers. He stated that there is presently seating for 500 people . Recreation Supervisor 1<en Ballard distril:uted an informational sheet concerning the Junior Golf Program. Ballard reported that the second session of lessons is currently being conducted, wh:i.ch is an advanced beginler class with 24 students enrolled. Fran ob- servation and in talking with Jr. Golf instructor Mark Kin:iahl, Ballard believes that the program operation is going very well. Ballard stated also that persmnel time and IIDney contril:uted to this program fran the various golf clubs and organizations is very tlllCh appreciated and has added to the success of the program. Ballard stated that the inter- est in this program fran the public is definitely there and he believes the prog- ram will be even stronger by getting an earlier start in planning for next year. Ballard also reported that this year, Englewood was lucky in that they were able to get a small tean into the Metro Tean Golf League at the last minute due to another tean dropping out. This league is played with seven other golf courses . There was sane discussion ccnceming the enrollment of the youth golf progran becaning • I • • Engl~ Parks and Recreation Ccmnission Minutes of July 12, 1984 Page -4- • • • (too large. Ballard stated that a group of fifty to sixty would be considered large in canparison to other Engl~ recreation programs and the size can be controlled in order that a reascnably sized and quality group can be maintained . Ballard reported that the adult golf lessons program has also beEn very successful with 22 people enrolled. Lessons for adults will be offered again in the Fall. Ccmnissioner Boaranan referred to an article he read in the Engl~ Sentinel where- in it stated that the Engl~ Golf Course is a slow course. Director Ranan.s explained that sane courses are referred to as slow-playing because they are UDre challenging and for the better golfer, lohile other courses are with:lut sand traps or lakes lohich make than easier and faster to play. The Ccmnission thanked Ken Ballard for his efforts in setting up the youth golf program. City Manager kdy fot:~ was present to discuss future plans for the lUlcan Building. Giving sane backgrolnd information, fot:~ stated that the City was approar..hed at a City/ ( , School Cannittee meeting approximately three UDnths ago by the school representatives of ' • the the City/School Ccmnittee to see if the City agx:ewa:nt for use of D.ncan Scrool Build- ing could be tetminated sooner than January 1, 1985 so that the school could lease the llincan facility to Swedish Medical Center for a gerontology center. Swedish requested the lease be effective in Sept&Iber if the City could arr~ to DDve its progrlml else- where. fot:Cown went en to exPlain that the City has looked at several scrool facilities and made arrangauents to UDve City D.Jncan progrlml at the Elld of August tS!p)rarily to O:lerrelyn Elanentary School, and the nature center will be IOOVed to Maddox Scrool on a permanent basis. Concerning the present D.ncan Park agreenent of 1968 lohich is a 25 year agreanent for the park area south of the school building, fot:Colon explained that in 1993, the agreanent may be renewed annually autanatically Ull.ess either party gives a 30 day notice of cancellation. In 1978, ~stated, a lease was entered into by the City for the use of the D.Jncan Building. He stated this lease also mistakenly included a legal description of the entire property including the park ptoperty. The city park crew, as stipulated in the lease, is also maintaining the grass area north of the building. ~ • I . • ~1~ Parks and Recreation Ccmn:ission Minutes of July U, 1984 Page -5- • • • ( stated that in recent discussions with the City/School Ccmnittee, it was decided that the 1978 agreEIIelt w:ruld be cancelled. They also decided to extend the 1968 agreenent to cover the area rorth of the I:Ulcan Building and state in the agreEIIelt that the entire area aromd the building will be leased as a park and maintained by the City exclusive of the school building. Also included in that lease w:ruld be a provision that the users of the park area w:ruld have access to the Uolo outdoor restrocms on the outside of the IUncan Building. McCowl stated that Swedish Hospital wants to UDVe into I:Ulcan Building by Septeuber 1 and his office is w:Jrking very hard to prepare an ordinance to effectuate this changeover to be ready for the next City Council meeting. He stated that in the event the ordinance is rot ready in time for that Council meeting, he w:JUld ask City Colrlcil, subject to the Ccmn:i.ssion 1 s recameldation to Council, to approve this cax:ept which w:ruld allow Swedish Hospital to begin making :i.Irprovenents in the IUncan Building, and then CCI!l! back to Council at a later date with the prepared ordinance. ( Ccmnissioner Higday reported that at a recent meeting with Swedish Hospital represent- atives, he was able to ask SaDe pertinent questions \oihich were asked him by several I:Ulcan neighbors regarding Swedish &spital 1 s future plans for the IUlcan Building: (1) Will Swedish request the School Board to permit than to extend the J>..ncan Building? ; (2) Will Swedish, as in the past, attalpt to purchase residences near IUlcan?; (3) Will Swedish ask, because of progr111111 going on within the coofines of the building, for a parking fac- ility anywhere en the property? Each of these questions was answered with "rw:>". Higday asked than ~t kind of parking problans they anticipate, and they informed him that dur- ing the peak period of activity they expect arCUld 35 to 40 participants within the bW.ld- ing '\otv:> will drive cars, others will be transported in Interfaith vans or similar trans- portation. They, therefore, do rot anticipate a parking problEIII. It was agreed at this meeting, Higday stated, that the Swedish progrsn participants will park en the lbncan Park side of the street and rot en the residential side of the street. Higday asked also if ( the outside rest:roam will be kept open for park users and was informed that they w:JUld be kept open . Higday stated that '\b!n the City/Scrool cxntract expires in 1993, or ~ • • I . Englewood Parks and Recreation Camiission Minutes of July 12. 1984 Page -6- • • • 1 'll;pe D.Jncan property beccmes available for sale by the Sch:x>l Board. the City sOOuld make every attmpt to make that purchase in order to secure the property permanently for a city park. • Ccmnissioner Boar<ban stated that the agreement betweEn the scbx>l and Swedish lbsp- ital will include a stipulation '-lherein the scbx>l may renegotiate that agreerent in the event there is a future need to use the building as a scbx>l facility . Ccmnissioner Allen asked if Swedish 'lomlld be willing to pay a portion of the mainten- ance costs on upkeep of the park area around IU1can Building . Ccmnissioner Higday informed her that this was discussed in length with sch:x>l and Swedish representatives and <hle to cnly one water tap on the premises and several other factors, the City/Sch:x>l agreenent was extended to include all grotnds arOIDd the building to be maintained by the City as a park facility. After considerable discussion concerning future plans for I>.Jncan Building, Camiissioner ( ares made a IIDtion, seconded by Ccmnissioner Allen, that the Parks and Recreation Ccmnission recaiiiii!lld to City COI.ncil that they approve the plan and concept of the Parks and Recreation Department's tiDVe fran D.n:an and Swedish's tiDVe into DJncan as presented by City ~er l'tCcMl. The IIDtion passed. lhder Director's clK>ice, Director Ranans rEminded the Ccmnission that they are in- vited to the Malley Senior Advisory Ccmnittee piarl.c en August 2, 1984, at the heme of Ccmnission meober Fran Howard. Ranans asked the Ccmnissien if they wished to hold their regularly scheduled August 9th Ccmnission meting since they will be meting en August 2. After sane discussion, Ccmnissioner Galles made a IIDtion, secooded by Ccmnissioner Boaranan, that the Ccmnission dispense with the August Ccmnission meting uU.ess a need arises in which a meting becanes necessary. The IIDtion passed. There was sane discussion concerning the 1985 Parks and Recreation Wdget. Ccmniss- ioner Bradshaw stated it 1D.lld be beneficial to City Cculcil that after the aaninistrative ( :eview of the Wdget that the Ccmnission present their b.Jdget concerns to the Cculcil. Concerning b.Jdgeting for the recreation center staff. Director RaDans stated the • I . • - • Englewood Parks and Recreation Ccmn:ission Minutes of July 12, 1984 Page -7- • • - f '"'recreation staff has surveyed m:!tro area recreation centers and examined their budgets ( to determine the m.ni>er of staff that will be needed for the Englewood Recreation Center. IA.Iring discussion cmcerning recreation center staffing, Director Ranans inform:!d the Ccmnission that he will reccmrend Ken Ballard to be director of the new recreatioo center ; however, because of her experience and knowledge of aquatics, Carolyn Tracy will be in charge of the swi.mning pool. It was explained that Ken ~d continue his present respons- ibilities in addition to directing the recreation center. There was considerable discussioo cooceming staffing of the recreation center and the many responsibilities of the center director~ includes supervising adult sports prograns. Foe stated that in checking into the staffing of other area recreation centers, South Sub.trban has one indivicbal. directing bolo recreation centers \oJh::> also is in charge of the adult sports programs . Foe believes that Ken Ballard is capable of carrying out the many responsibilities that will be turned over to him as center director. Foe stated that they have requested to hire for the recreation center, in additioo to present staff, bolo new full time custodians, one new full time clerk/receptionist and three new part time b.rl.lding supervisors . llider Ccmni.ssicner' s croice, Ccmnissioner Galles asked that a report be prepared cover- ing the Carousel Progran (sumaer playgr'OI.Kld progran) and asked that it include the TlLIIiler of youth enrolled, lilat scrools are being used for the progran, daily attendance and staffing of the centers . Assistant Director Foe will write the report . Ccmnissioner Bradshaw stated it is time to consider the solicitation of applicatioos for the bolo youth Ccmni.ssion llll!llbers tb:>se terms will expire October 1, 1984 . Discussion ensued concerning the appropriate procedlre to follow in soliciting the applicatioos. In an effort to reach all Ehglewod youth of high scrool age, the Ccmnission decided that the best approach 'Wllld be to advertise in the Englewod Citizen and Englewood Sentinel news- papers and to inform Englewod High School principal Gary Price that applications are available. The deadline for turning in applicatioos will be Septalber 7, 1984. Ccmnissioner Boarchan asked the Ccmnission if they \Oll.d like to reply to an article • I • • - • F.ngle.oxi Parks and Recreation Coomissicn Minutes of July U, 1984 Page -8- • • • f# 'le recently read in the NRPA Dateline cmceming acid rain and air polution and how it is effecting the nation's forests. Director Rcmans said he \IUU!d check to see where such a reply \IUU!d be DDst beneficial . The meeting was adjourned at 8 :30p .m . • • I . . • (I • PRESENI': ABSENI': • • • OOARD OF CAREm SERVICE <DMISSIOOERS July 19, 1984 Betty Keena, Janet I<erzic, catherine Pokraka, 'lhanas Fitzpatrick, Donald Weber None <:miERS PRESmr: Benjamin Craig, Career Service Board Attorney Olainnan Heber called the neetin;J to order. CCmnissi.oner I<eena llUITed, secxn:led by Ckmnissioner Kerzic, to approve the mirrutes of the May 19, 1984 regular neeti.n:J. AYES: Pokraka, I<erzic, Keena, Fitzpatrick, Heber NP.YS: None Itan three on the agenda was the Association's Clloice. No representative was present. Itan foor on the agenda was the City Manager's Clloice. '!here was no repre- sentative fran the City Manager's office present. Itan five on the agenda was the o:mnissioner's Clloice. 'lhe first item of business was the approval of l:udget expeniitures. Ckmnissioner Pokraka IIIJIIIed, sea:n:led by o:mnissioner Keena to approve the Wdget expenditures. 'lhe second itan for consideration fran l'Uiber five on the agenda was the noted change of E.F.F.A. officers as brought to the Board's attention by ODnissioner Pokraka. 'lhe next itan for consideration was to set the hellrir¥3 dates for the Ivory O'lby case. Assistant City Attorney 'Ian Holland, on behalf of the City, sti!;W.ated that the awea1 of Ivory O'lby had been filed in a timely nanner. 'lhe Board determined that O'lby's appeal had been filed in a timely fashion. HearirJ3s have been set for .Auqust 16 and 23, 1984. '!here being no WUIChsduled visitors, <lla:iiman Weber aooept.ed a DDtion for adja.uTment and adjoorned the July 19, 1984 regular IIIBeti.R3. Donald Weber, Olaiiman • I • • ' • CALL TO ORDER • • • ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOAR D OF COMMISSIONERS Regular Meet i ng Wednesday, July 25, 1984 The Regular Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority was called to order at 5:10 p.m. on July 25, 1984, by Chairman Thomas J. Burns, at Simon Center, 3333 South Lincoln St., Englewood, Colorado, 80110. I . ROLL CALL Members Present: Members Absent: Also Present: Thomas J. Burns, Chairman Betty Beier, Vice Chairman Valerie Lash, Member Cindy Peterson, Member Beverly Bradshaw, Member Ms. Barbara Laube, WHERE Project Director Ms. Michelle Buck, WHERE Adm i nistrative Assistant Mr. Jess Robinson, WHERE Board President Frances Buck Jonas, Executive Director -EHA Robb Short, Housing Rehab Superv i sor for ARRP Tou r Frank E. McCoumb, Maintenance Supervisor Marie Gutterres, President, Orchard Place Tenant Co uncil Mary A. Rya n , Re cordi ng Secretary The Chai rm an declared a quoru m to be presen t. The Meet i ng began wi t h a t ou r of ARRP Pr oj ec ts conducted by Robb Short, Hou si ng Rehab i l i tation Supervi sor. Mult i ple s visi t ed we r e 3034 South Gala pago, 274 3 Sou th Delaware, 2758 South Dela ware and t he City of Englewood relocati on pro j ect loc at ed at 30 73 South Ela ti . Th e tour wa s ve ry enlighte ning and all who at tende d gained much insight from Mr. Short's educational briefing. The Meeting resumed at 3333 South lincoln St. with a presentation by Barbara Laube of WHERE who talked with the Board of Commissioners and others present about the planned widening of South Santa Fe by the State Highway Department. The problems created by such a realignment for the mobile home parks along that highway such as noise poloution, access to the City of Englewood bicycle path by residents of Englewood living elst of South Santa Fe, access to the business district of Englewood by residents of the mobile home parks, and safety of mo bile home resi dents who try to cross South Santa Fe into Englewood's business dist r ict were broug ht to the at- tention of the Board. Ms. Laube further explained WHERE's proposed purchase of the mobile home parks and the formation of a co-op community which would preserve 150 existing mobile home sites. Ms. Laube further explained the proposed amendment to the zoning law to allow mobile homes in 1-1 (light industria l ) zone. Also exp l ained by Ms. Laube was a proposal to use the mobile homes for future rehab projects and the assisting of persons to purchase these rehabilitated units . • I • • , ( • Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting July 25, 1984 • • • Page Three Frances Buck Jonas then informed the Board of Commissioners of a meeting held July 25, 1984, with Jim Ethier of Triad Colorado concerning boiler conversion which would result in substantial savings for Orchard Place and Simon Center. Also relative to this discussion about solar retrofit equipment was a letter from Art Tonelli, Technical Services Officer, Architechtural, Eng ineering and Cost Branch of HUD, which was submitted for the review of the Board of Commis- sioners. Further discussion on the matter of solar retrofit equipment to be used at Orchard Place and Simon Center was tabled until more information could be obtained on Ji m Ethier's plan. The r~ai ntenance Status Reports for Simon Center, Orchard Place and the Duplexes were noted by the Boa rd of Commissioners. In this regard, Frances Buck Jonas briefly informed the Board of Commissioners that the problem of watering the lawn at the Duplex at 3125 South Lincoln, occupied by a disabled tenant, has been solved by hiring someone to do the work at a cost of $10.00 per week . IV. SIMON CENTER The Simon Center Status Report was noted with brief mention by Thomas Burns that the building was 100 % leased up. Ms. Jonas mentioned that the manager of Simon Center, Joyce Perry, who has been on maternity leave will be returning to work the first week of August. v. SECTION 8 EXISTING The Section 8 Existing Status Report was noted by the Board of Commissioners. The Board then reviewed the Project Self Sufficiency pre-application with a brief discus- sion concerning possible day-care centers within the City of Englewood which could possibly be utilized by this program. The Action Alert from NAHRO concerning NAHRO's victory in urging HUD to drop the proposed Section 8 Ex. administrative fee reduction was briefly explained to the Board of Commissioners by Ms. Jonas. Also briefly discussed was the 3.5% increase in Fa ir Market Rents. The resignation of Joyce Brei as Leased Housing Manager ~1as next brought to the at- tention of the Board of Commissioners. Ms. Jonas said that Ms. Brei had done a wonderful job in upg radi ng the quality of work done for the Engle~10od Housin g Authority's Section 8 Existing program and that Ms. Brei would be missed a great deal. VI. REHABILITATION The Rehab Status Report was noted by the Board of Commissioners with brief mention by Ms. Jonas that the State funding had been received by the Englewood Housing Authority. The Rehab loan limits on the multiple family dwellings was discussed. Concerns such as loans made to owners of multiple units and dollar amounts to be spent on units increasing in proportion to the number of units were touched upon briefly. It was agreed upon by the Board of Cor.111issioners that a more indepth analysis needed to be done on the subject before ratification of the new loan limits . • I • • r • Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting July 25, 19B4 • • - Page Two High density of mobile homes in the parks and ways to lower that density, a bicycle path/si dewalk overpass to connect the mobile home parks with the business district of Englewood, and homeownership to a broader range of low to moderate income persons through the co-op were also discussed. II. READING AND APPROVAL OF MINUTES The t1i nutes of the June 27, 1984, meeting were approved with the fo 11 owing amendments: Page 5 Page 6 First Paragraph -eleventh line add, "and approved" after discussed. Last Paragraph -first line delete, "laborious" MOTION IT WAS MOVED BY VALERIE LASH THAT THE MINUTES OF THE JUNE 27, 1984, REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS BE ACCEPTED AS AMENDED. CINDY PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT : BURNS, BEIER, LASH, PETERSON NONE BRADSHAW The Chairman declared the Motion carried. I I I . ~UBh.!.f . HOUSING The Status Report submitted for the Duplexes was noted with no discussion by the Board of Commissioners. New Income Limits for Public Housing were noted with a brief explanation by Ms . Jonas that the income limits for the Section 8 Existing and Public Housing Programs were now to be identical. Previously, the programs had different income limits. Chairman Thomas J. Burns stated that the City Council of Englewood was very grateful for the PILOT (Payment In Lieu ~f Taxes) Payment in the amount of $19,945.84. The Orchard Place Status Report was noted with little discussion. Al so given brief discuss i on was the letter from the Office of Energy Conservation of the State of Colorado to Utilities Service Association notifying USA that they were a 1984 Energy Conservation Pacesetter Award winner. Included in the discussion con- cerning USA was a letter from Jimmie Mil l s of Bernick and Moch, Legal Counsel for the Englewood Housing Authority which contained a review of the proposal from Utilities Service Association . • I • • c • Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting July 25 , 1984 • • • Page Three Frances Buck Jonas then informed the Board of Commissioners of a meeting held July 25, 1984, with Jim Ethier of Triad Colorado concerning boiler conversion whi ch would result in substantial savings for Orchard Place and Simon Center. Also relative to this discussion about solar retrofit equipment was a letter fro m Art Tonelli, Technical Services Officer, Architechtural, Enginee ring and Cost Branch of HUD, which was submitted for the review of the Board of Commis- sioners. Further discussion on the matter of solar retrofit equipment to be used at Orchard Place and Simon Center was tabled until more information could be obtained on Ji m Ethier's plan. The f~aintenance Status Reports for Simon Center, Orchard Place and the Duplexes were noted by the Board of Commissioners. In this regard, Frances Buck Jonas briefly informed the Board of Commissioners that the problem of watering the lawn at the Duplex at 3125 South Lincoln, occupied by a disabled tenant, has been solved by hiring someone to do the work at a cost of $10.00 per week. IV. SIMON CENTER ----- The Simon Center Status Report was noted with brief mention by Thomas Burns that the building was 100 % leased up. Ms. Jonas mentioned that the manager of Simon Center, Joyce Perry, who has been on maternity leave will be returning to work the first week of August. v. SECTION 8 EX!STING The Section 8 Existing Status Report was noted by the Board of Commissioners. The Board then reviewed the Pro ject Self Sufficiency pre-application with a brief discus- sion concerning possible day-care centers within the City of Englewood which could possibly be utilized by this program. The Action Alert from NAHRO concerning NAHRO's victory in urgi11g HUD to drop the proposed Section 8 Ex. administrative fee reduction was briefly explained to the Board of Commissioners by Ms. Jonas. Also briefly discussed was the 3.5% increase in Fair Market Rents. The resignation of Joyce Brei as Leased Housing Manager ~1as next brought to the at- tention of the Board of Commissioners. Ms. Jonas said that Ms . Brei had done a wonderful job in upgrading the quality of work done for the Englewood Housing Authority's Section 8 Existing program and that Ms. Brei would be missed a great deal. VI. REHABILITAI!Q~ The Rehab Status Report was noted by the Board of Commissioners with brief mention by Ms. Jonas that the State funding had been received by the Englewood Housing Authority. The Rehab loan limits on the multiple family dwellings was discussed. Concerns such as loans made to owners of multiple units and dollar amounts to be spent on units increasing in proportion to the number of units were touched upon briefly. It was agreed upon by the Board of Co~issioners that a more indepth analysis needed to be done on the subject before ratification of the new loan limits . • I • • Englewood Housing Authority Board of Conmissioners f1eeting July 25, 1984 • • • Page Four The telephone poll authorizing the Executive Director to open a ~arket Interest Account at First Interstate Bank of Engle~'lood, N.A. in which would be deposited the funds received from the State of Colorado for the rehab program was ratif ied . Such questions as how long the money 1-10uld be in the account and when it would be drawn down were discuss ed. !•lOTION IT WAS ~lOVED BY CINDY PETERSON TO RATIFY THE TELEPHONE POLL AUTHORIZING THE EXECU- TIVE DIRECTOR OF THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY TO OPEN A MARKET INTEREST ACCOUNT AT FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF ENGLEWOOD, N.A., IN WHICH TO DEPOSIT THE 1984 STATE REHAB GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $67,500.00. VALERIE LASH SECONDED THE MOTION. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, BEIER, LASH, PETERSON NONE BRADSHAW The Chairman declared the Motion carried. The ARRP Status Report was noted by the Board of Conmissioners . The memorandum from Janet Grimmett, Housing Finance Specialist, and the letter from Robert G. Moch, Engle~ J Housing Authority Legal Counsel regarding the proposed shared equity lien were discussed. No action was taken on this matter since the Board of Commissioners felt more infbrma- tion was needed and suggested that t1r. Moch attend the next meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissio~ers to inform the Board of the different types of financing to consider for the ARRP units. VII. TENANT COUNCIL 11arie Gutterres, Tenant Council President of Orchard Place introduced for discussion the topic concerni ng the problem of children playing on the premises of Orchard Place. The safety and security risks involved and the noise created by the children and proposed solutions to these problems were discussed. Frank McCoumb, Maintenance Super- visor reported to the Board of Commissioners that he had talked with the parents of the children caught playino on the Orchard Place property and informed the parents that the police would be called the next time the children were caught playing on the premises. Also discussed was the noise created by the trash disposal people picking up garbage early in the mornino. It was suggested that the Executive Director investi- gate to see if an ordinance existed governing this problem and/or writing a letter of complaint to the disposal company handling trash removal at Orchard Place. VIII. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE The 1984 Tax Reform Act was then brought up for discussion with Mortgage Subsidy Bonds (liSB's), 11ortgage Credit Certificates (MCC's) and Industrial Development Bonds (lOB's, being covered . • I • • - • Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting July 25, 1984 • • • Page Five Submitted for the information of the Board of Commissioners was a letter from Steve Giles concerning HUD's Affordable Housing Infill Demonstration Program for ECHO Housing. The reorganization of the Community Development Department was briefly discussed. The Board of Commissioners asked how long Ms. Knopinski, Housing Administrator, 1~ould be working part time with the Urban Rene~1al Authority. The status of the filing system conversion with costs of equipment and supplies was explained by Frances Jonas. MOTION IT wAS ~~VED BY BETTY BEIER TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO PURCHASE THE EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES TO IMPLEMENT THE FILING SYSTEM AS PROPOSED BY AUSTIN ASSOCIATES FROM FUNDS IN THE SECTION 8 EXISTING OPERATING RESERVE. CINDY PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, BEIER, LASH, PETERSON NONE BRADSHAW The Chairman declared the motion carried. The Department of Housing and Urban Development's Denver Regional Office of Housing notice of acceptance of applications for the development of public housing projects pursuant to Notice PIH 84-6 (HUD) dated June 5, 1984, was briefly discussed. ~lOTION IT WAS MOVED BY CINDY PETERSON TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO HUD FOR FUNDING TO BE USED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC HOUSING PRO- JECTS WITH ACQUISITION WITH OR WITHOUT REHABILITATION AS THE METHOD OF PRODUCTION OF UNITS FOR LARGE FAMILIES (THREE OR rlORE BEDROOMS). VAL[RIE LASH SECONDED THE I-10TION. AYES : NAYS : ABSENT: BURNS, BE I ER , LA SH , PETERSON NONE BRADSHAW The Chairman de c lared the motion carried. • I - • • Englew ood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners Meeting July 25, 1984 • • • The matter of NAHRO Conferences was next discussed. MOTION Page Six IT WAS MOVED BY VALERIE LASH TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND THE HOUSING ADMINISTRATOR TO ATTEND THE f"'OUNTAIN PLAINS REGIONAL COUNCIL OF NAHRO IN JACKSON HOLE, WYOMING, AT A COST OF $500.00 EACH; TO AUTHORIZE TWO COMMISSIONERS TO ATTEND THE NAHRO NATIONAL CO~HSSIONERS EDUCATIOt\AL CONFERENCE IN DEN 'JER, COLORADO, AT A COST OF $250.00 EACH; AND TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND TWO COMMISSIONERS TO AT- TEND THE NATIONAL NAHRO CONFERENCE AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS, IN ST . LOUIS, MISSOURI, AT A COST OF $1 ,200.00 EACH, WITH THE COST BEING ADDED TO THE SIMON CENTER AND SECTION 8 EXISTING BUDGETS, PRORATED BY NUMBER OF UNITS. CINDY PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. AYES: NAYS : ABSENT : BURNS, BEIER, LASH, PETERSON NONE BRADSHAW The Chairman declared the motion carried. MOTION IT WAS MOVED BY CINDY PETERSON THAT THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT THIS POINT IN THE MEETING TO DISCUSS A PROPOSAL FROM A DEVELOPER REGARDING IDB BOND ISSUANCE FOR MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING. VALERIE LASH SECONDED THE MOTION . AYES: NAYS: ABSENT : BURNS, BEIER, LASH, PETERSON NONE BRADSHAW The Chairman declared the motion carried. MOTION IT WAS MOVED BY BETTY BEIER THAT THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS LEAVE EXECUTIVE SESSION AND AJOURN THE REGULAR PORTION OF THE MEETING HELD JULY 25, 1984. CINDY PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION . AYES : BURNS, BEIER, LASH, PETERSON NAYS : NONE ABSENT : BRADSHAW The Chairman declared the Motion carried. The Meeting adjourned at 10 :20 p.m. Mary A. Ryan, Recording Secretary • I . - • • • • The l~inutes of the Regula r t~eeting of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners held July 25, 1984, stand approved as amended. • I • • ( • • • • ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, July 27,1983 Simon Center 3333 South Lincoln Street Englewood, Colorado 80110 CALL TO ORDER The Regular Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority was called to order by Chairman Thomas J. Burns at 5:05p.m. on July 27, 1983, at Simon Center, 3333 South Lincoln Street, Englewood, Colorado, 80110. !10LL CALL Members Present: Thomas J. Burns, Chairman Beverly Bradshaw, Member Cindy Peterson, f~ember Valerie Lash, Member Members Absent : Betty Beier, Vice Chairman Also Present: Frances Buck Jonas, Executive Director Linda A. Knopinski, Housing Administrator Donna Bauman, Recording Secretary I. APPROVAL OF r1INUTES --------- M/S BRADSHAW, PETERSON TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 25, 1983 AS AMENDED, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT : BURNS, BRADSHAW, PETERSON, LASH NONE BEIER M/S PETERSON, BRADSHAW TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 29, 1983, AS ANENDED, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES : NAYS : ABSENT: II. BURNS, BRADSHAW, PETERSON, LASH NONE BEIER PUBLIC HOUSING PROJECTS Duplexes Status Report for June, 1983, noted and accepted by Board of Commissioners. Orchard Place Status Report for June, 1983, noted and accepted by Board of Commissioners. Orchard Place fire in he t ~a s hroom . • I • • • Englewood Housing Authority Board of Corm1i ss i one rs l~eet i ng July 27, 1983 • • • Page Two M/S PETERSON , BRADSHAW, TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS LEGAL ISSUES OF THE ~lATTER OF THE FIRE IN THE ORCHARD PLACE TRASHR00~1. MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLDrJS : AYES: NAYS : ABSENT: BURNS, BRADSHAW, PETERSON, LASH NONE BEIER ~1/S PETERSON, LASH, TO END EXECUTIVE SESSION . I·IOT!ON CARR I ED AS FOLLDrJS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, BRADSHAW, PETERSON, LASH NONE BEIER Or c hard Place Broad Range of Income Report -noted and accepted by the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Corm1issioners. Orchard Place Water Proble ~/Elastomeric Coating -Tom Chandler and Jim Nel son disc us sed this with the Executive Director and stated they were r eady to go with thi s as soon as the weather cooperates. Wanted Executive Director to talk to Carl Fisher and have him do the sp ecs and oversee the installation . Executive Dire c t or talked to f·1r. Fi sher and Mr . Fisher stated he would be glad to do this; however, was some concern that if he wrote specs and oversaw installation, that it might make the Englewood Housing Autho rity responsible and liable instead of Brady/Nel son -Rot h. It was decided that Carl Fisher should inspect but not design and over see as it would be a confl ict of interest. Board instructed Executive Dire cto r to tell Carl Fisher he wo uld inspect, but should not write specs, only approve them; and approve, but NOT supervise installation. Ma intenan ce SupervisQ! Re ort -This is a new report. The new Ma intenance Supervisor, Frank McCoumb willprepare a report each month to keep the Board informed of time spent, as well as where time is spent and type of ma;ntenance required. Noted and accepted by the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners. Listin for Schedule of Repair and Replacement Charges -the main change is the labor charge. Before, the Englewood Housing Authority had a set rate, and due to rising cost of labor, it is more feasible to say "at rate of the employee's hourly rate plus pro-rated fringe benefits' rather than set a definite time or do 11 ar ar.~ount. M/S PETERSON, BRADSHAW, TO ACCEPT THIS NEW SCHEDULE OF REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT CHARGES, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT : BURNS, BRADSHAW, PETERSON, LASH NON E BEIER I • • • Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners r~eeting July27,1983 • • • Page Three Letter from HUD regarding PHA, LEPH Cost Containment -Noted and accepted by Board. Let~er to HUD regardin~YE~~l_~ -This was to inform HUD of EHA corrective act1on taken on the HUD Audit conducted March 7, 1983. Noted and accepted by Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners. Letter from Kathleen Allin reoarding Mares Case M/S PETERSON, BRADSHAW TO ENTER EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS THE NARES PERSONNEL f~TTER, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BURNS, BRADSHAW, PETERSON, LASH NONE BEIER M/S BRADSHAW, PETERSON, TO END EXECUTIVE SESSION, f10TION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: I I I. BURNS, BRADSHAW, PETERSON, LASH NONE BEIER SIMON ~ENTER Simon Center Status Report f~r June, 1983, Noted and accepted by the Englewood Housing Author1ty Board of Commissioners. IV. SECTION 8 EXISTIN§ Section 8 Existing Status Re port for J~~~. 1983 -Noted and accepted by Englewood Housing Authority Board of Comm1ss1oners. V. REHABILITATION PROGRAM Rehab Status Report for June, 1983. r~oted and acceoted by Engle1·1ood Housing Authority Board of Comm1ssione rs.----- ARRP Status Report for June, 1983. Chairman Thomas J. Burns received a call from an attorney who had a client who wanted to donate some property to the Englewood Hou si ng Authority if they could get a tax writeoff . Kehab Financial Status Repo~~ -Executive Director stated that since Galen Dalton, Finance Department accountant, left, the Englewood Housing Authority has not had a financial status report on Rehab . t1s. Jonas reported that Mr . Dalton is being brought in on a private consulting basis to work with his replacement to familiarize her with the reporting procedures. Therefore, the Englewood Housing Authority should be getting financial reports on Rehabs . • I • • - • Engl ewood Hou s ing Autho ri ty Board of Corrmis s ioners l~eeting Ju l y 27, 1983 • • - Page Fou r M/S BRADSHAW, PETERSON TO AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE ENGLEWOOD HOU SI NG AUTHORITY TO GAIN PERMISSION OF THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD DF COMMISSIONE RS TO CONDUCT A TELEPHONE POLL I N ORDER TO GAIN AUTHORIZATION FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF TilE ENGLEWOOD HOU SING AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE ARRP SI TES. MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLO WS : AYE S: NAY S: ABSENT: BURNS , BRADSHAW, PETERSON, LASH NONE BEIER M/S BRADSHAW, PETERSON, THAT THE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY NOT BUY TH E TWO HOUSES PURC HASED BY MR. RYBERG FOR THE ARRP PROGRAM. THE 110TION CARRIED AS FOLLOW S: AYES : NAYS : ABSENT: VI. BURNS, BRADSHAW, PETERSON, LASH NONE BEIER DIRECTORS' CHOI CE Let t e r from HUD rega r ding O~ating Budget Submi ssion . The Englewood Housing Autho rit . Budget is being completed. A work ses sion for the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commiss i oners will be called i n order to gain approval of the 1982 Budget and that Budget can be submitted to HUD. Th e Execu ti ve Di r ector repo r ted that she (The Execut i ve Direc to r) wi ll be in touch wi th Do m Nes si, Assis tant Dir ec tor for Hou si ng Managemen t , and ex pla i n to Mr . Ne ssi ou r sta t us a s f ar a s the En glewood Hous i ng Auth or i ty 's f i nan c ial report and budget and what the Engl ewood Hou si ng Authority i s do i ng t o res ol ve t he Budget acc ounting situat ion. NAHRO an d Hou si ng Dev e l opme nt articles. Noted and acce pted by t he Engl ewood Housing Authori t y Boa rd of Commissioners . Public Housing Computer Accounting Study Executi ve Dir ector to mee t wi t h head of Englewood Finance Department and discuss revising City of Englewo od's account numbers so that the computer would provide data in the form necess a ry to prepare the Englewood Housing Authority financial reports . It was decided by the Board of Com- missioners that more information was needed. Memo Regarding Cit~ of En~lewood Picnic, 7/30/83, Cook Park -noted and accepted by the Englewood Hous1ng Aut ority Board of Comm1ssio ners. Possible Date for Housing Authority Picnic-Date de ci ded upon wa s Augu st 27, 19 83 , Saturda y, at 11:00 a.m. ·-- • I • • • • Englewood Housing Authority Boa rd of Commissioners Meeting July 27, 1983 • • • Page Five Prospective EHA Attorneys It was the recommendation of the Executive Directo r that the Board of Commissioners review proposals and do interviews and decide who to retain as the Englewood Housing Authority Attorney. Tenant Representation at Board 1·1eetings -The Building Managers have made tenants at Orchard Place and Siroon Center aware of the opportunity to attend Engle~10od llousing Authority Board of Commissioners Meetings, and it is expected that either the Tenant Council or an individual tenant will attend the meetings. VII. COMMISSIONERS CHOICE Appointment to Board of Commissioners of Housing Authority of the City of Englewood of Valerie Lash was reported. NAHRO r1ilwaukee Commissioners' Seminar was discussed. Rehab Loan Committee -The Rehab Loan Committee needs a new Housing Authority Member representat1ve. Their being no further business to be brought before the Board of Commissioners, the motion was made and seconded and the Meeting was adjourned. Transcribed from Rough Draft found in original Minutes book. Draft done by D. Bauman, but not finalized. I • • - • • • • The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority Board of Commissioners held July 27, 1983, stand approved as amended. • I • • • • • • ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 3535 S. Sherman -Englewood, CO 80110 MINUTES August 1, 1984 Board Members Present: Green, Holthaus, Kaufman, Oswald, Owens, Pendleton, Tomooka Board Members Absent: Coleman, Mausolf, Neal Staff PResent: M. Haviland, P. Dietrich Guests: Dorothy Dalquist, Andy McCown, Susan Powers The regular meeting of the EDDA Board of Directors was called to order by Chairman Pendleton at 12:01 PM on August 1, 1984. The minutes from the July 11, 1984 regular meeting were presented for approval. Mr. Tomooka moved, seconded by Mr. Green, to approve the minutes from the previous meeting. The motion was passed unant.ously by voice vote. The Treasurer's Report was presented by Dan Green. Mr. Tomooka moved, seconded by Ms. Owens, to accept the Treasurer's Report. The motion was passed unanimously by voice vote. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT Mr. Pendleton presented a resolution thanking Gordon Close for his time and dedication to the downtown effort: WHEREAS, Gordon Close has been dedicated to the betterment of the downtown district of Englewood, and WHEREAS, Gordon Close has been committed to the promotion of the downtown business association, and WHEREAS, Gordon Close has been a downtown merchant who has made a great contribution to the City of Englewood, I • • - • • Page Two Minutes August 1, 1984 • • • NOW, THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED that the Board of Directors sincerely thank Gordon Close for his time, effort and dedtcation as a Director of the Englewood Downtown Development Authortty. Ms. Owens moved, seconded by Mr. Kaufman, to adopt the resolution. The motion was passed unanimously by voice vote. Vacancy -Because the Board wanted a representative from Cinderella City as a Director, it was decided to send a letter to Mayor Otis recommending Linda Harmon, Marketing Director, for this vacancy. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Banners -Penny Dietrich presented several ideas for the banner program for South Broadway. Specific costs and necessary permits, insurance, and approvals will have to be determined before we can proceed with this project. Section II -Penny Dietrich is following up on a Section II edition of the Colorado Business Magazine. This would be an editorial and pictoral story of the City of Englewood, with particular emphasis on the retail flavor of the community. Specific costs and a time frame will be researched during the next month. Marketing Study Update -Mr. Kaufman suggested that the Brady marketing staff be included in the study. Mr. Haviland noted that the direction will be two step approach -one with Cinderella City and one with Swedish Medical Center. EDDA will act as a facilitator for the two major research projects. Statewide Development Corporation -Ms. Owens reported on the organizational meeting of this Corporation. It has been established primarily for the purpose of creating new jobs . The funding is from HUD, through the state of Colorado. CDBG Fund s -Some of the money allocated for the low interest loan program has been reallocated for relocation expenses to merchants in the impacted downtown redevelopment area. First priority will be given to those merchants that are relocating within the downtown area. Second priority will be given to those merchants that are relocating within the City of Englewood. Ms. Powers noted that $50,000 is left in the low interest loan program for facade improvements . Other - A request from Kells Waggoner was received for the funding of a shuttle ~ce between Cinderella City and Swedish Medical Center. The cost of this I • • • Page Three Minutes August 1, 1984 • • • would be approximately $30,000 a year. Mr. Pendleton referred this to the Executive Committee for further consideration and recommendation. The Board recessed into an Executive Session at 12:50 PM. The Board came out of Executive Session at 1:05 PM. Michael Haviland submitted his resignation as Executive Director, effective August 31, 1984. He indicated that he had accepted an opportunity in another state to further his career. The Board accepted his resignation. Mr. Pendleton indicated that the Executive Committee would meet and decide what course of action to recommend to the Board. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 1:10PM. I • • • ( • • • • 5E MINUTES ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS August 8, 1984 The regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals began at 7 :30 p.m . MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: ALSO PRESENT: Seymour, Hallagin, Brown, Dawson, Fish, Ferguson and Gag . None. Dorothy A. Romans, Staff Advisor Jack Olsen, City Attorney David Menzies, Assistant City Attorney Larry D. Yenglin, Planner I Sheryl Rousses, Recording Secretary * * * * * Chairman Gage called the meeting to order and stated that with seven members present, five votes would be required to grant a variance. BOARD MEMBER SEYMOUR MOVED THAT THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF JULY 11, 1984, BE APPROVED AS WRITTEN. Board Member Hallagin seconded the motion. Upon a vote all seven members voted in the affirmative, and the Chairman ruled that the Minutes from July 11, 1984, were APPROVED as written. * * * * * The Chairman stated that the Public Hearing for Case No. 22-84 was open and said that he had proof of posting and publication. He stated that the Board has been authorized to grant or deny a variance by Part 3, Section 60 of the Englewood City Charter. He asked that the staff identify the request. Larry D. Yenglin, Planner I for the City of Englewood, was sworn in for testimony. He stated that the applicants, Dallas and Phyllis Lemon, were requesting a variance for 4910 South Huron Street permitting a reduction in the minimum required front yard setback from 25 feet to 15 feet for a car port. This is a variance from the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Section 22.4-2 h (2) (a) - Minimum Front Yard. The Chairman asked that the applicant com forward for testimony. Phyllis Lemon, 4910 South Huron Street, came forward, and was sworn in. She stated that the carport extends 20 feet from the house into the front yard, but only a 10 foot addition is allowed. She stated that the carport wa s not for personal gain, but would provide them with required off-street parking • • I • • • • • • -2- Mr. Hallagin asked why no permit had been obta ined. She replied that they had applied for it, but started work before they obtained the permit because they had help available. When they discovered that there was a problem with the permit, and they were told to stop, they continued, as the y knew there was no opposition from the neighbors. She said they measured their property line as 29 feet from the house, assuming the sidewalk was the property line, and it turned out that their property line is 14 feet from the sidewalk. Mr. Seymour said that the carport is already built. He stated that there was a Stop Work Order issued. Mrs. Lemon said that was incorrect. She said that the City Inspector came by on Tuesday, and Mrs. Lemon told him that she had applied for a permit and that the office had said there was no problem, but there was a question. She said that the Inspector said that he could give her a Stop Work Order, but since she had applied for a permit, he did not. She said when she talked to the City they t old her t o say she was applying for a variance. Mr. Gage and Mr. Seymour said that they were t old in the Staff Report that a Stop Work Order had been issued, and approximately 50 % of the work had been done after that. She said that the framing was up, and they had finished it because that was when the help 'Was available, and their neighbo rs had no objections. The whol e project took about five days excludi ng the painting. Mr. Ferguson asked what hardship or unique circumstance was present in this case. If all the neighbors want a carport, will the y all want to be granted a variance. Mrs. Lemon said that they w re entitled to two off-street parking spaces. Mr. Ferguson said this can be a concrete pad. She said the carport provides protection for the car s . Mrs. Lemon said th y have four vehicles, and they are close to the corner, and ther have been several acciden ts in the intersection. Mrs. Dawson asked if the applicant understood that she would have t o obtain a permit and have inspections to see that th ca rpo rt m ets the Building Codes. Mrs. Lemon said she understood that. Hr. Dallas Lemon, 4910 South Hur on , was sworn in for testimony . He stated that he drives a service truck which c reates an obstacl at th corner, and he does not want to keep parking on the street . Visibility is difficult when the cars are parked on the street. He repeated that a Stop Work Order was not issued, and said it was only discussed. There were no further speakers for or against the variance. The Chairman included the Staff Report in the Record, and closed the Public Hearing for Case #22-84 . BOARD MEMBER HALLAGIN MOVED THAT THE APPLICANTS , DALLAS AND PHYLLIS LEMON, BE GRANTED A VARIANCE FOR 4910 SOUTH HURON STREET PERMITTING A REDUCTION IN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM 25 FEET TO 15 FEET FOR A CARPORT. THIS IS A VARIANCE FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 22.4-2 h (2) (a) -MINIMUM FRONT YARD. Board Member Ferguson seconded the motion. Discussion followed. Mr. Seymour stated that under the proposed new ordinance the setback requirement would be changed to 15 feet . • I • • - ( • • • • -3- The members voted and gave their findings as follows: Mr. Seymour voted "yes" because there was no opposition; there was a hardship, and the six conditions required for a variance were met. He then read the six requirements set forth in Section 22.2-6 c (1) (c) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. He said that the new ordinance will permit construction to within 15 feet of the front property line. Mr. Hallagin voted "yes", agreeing with Mr. Seymour. He said that, in his opinion, the construction looked very nice. Mr. Brown voted "yes". There were letters from the neighbors approving the carport. There is a hardship, and the truc k will be removed from the street. The neighborhood will be improved. Mrs. Dawson said there were three letters approving the variance and there was no opposition. The carport will help with the snow removal and remove some of the parked cars from the co rner. The general purpose of the Ordinance will not be weakened. Mr. Fish said that the request did meet the six requirements fairly well, although the hardship case was very weak. He voted "yes" beca use the proposed ordinance will permit this construction. Mr. Ferguson voted "yes" because the applicants did fulfill the six requirements necessary for granting a variance. It would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. He emphasized that he disapproved of the method used by the applicants in erecting the carport without obtaining a Building Permit. Mr. Gage said that the applicant met the six conditions necessary to grant a variance. He said there was a hardship because there is no alley. The structure looks nice and enhances the neighborhood. When the votes were displayed, all seven memb rs had voted in the affirmative. The Chairman ruled that the requ st was granted, and instructed the applicants to contact the Building Division to obtain a p rmit and inspections. * * * * * The Chairman opened the Public Hearing on Case #23-84 . He stated that he had proof of publication and posting of the subject property. He stated that this Board has the authority to authorize or deny a request for a variance. The authority is Part 3, Section 60 of the Englewood City Charter . He asked that the Staff identify the request. Larry D. Yenglin, Planner I for the City of Englewood, was sworn in and stated that the applicant is requesting permission to use the structure and premises at 2303 East Dartmouth Avenue as a professional office building for occupancy by attorneys and/or architects. This is a variance from the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Section 22.4-2 b -Permitted Principal Uses. The Chairman asked that the applicant come forward and testify in the case. Bernard B. Beradini stated that he is the attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Chesler. He submitted an index of the exhibits which had been given previously to the Secretary. He pr sented a loos leaf notebook to each member of the Board and to the Secretary. The notebook contained copi s of all the exhibits for th applicant. He stated that h had submitt d th justification for the request for a variance in which all six of the questions necessary for a variance are • I • • • • • -4- addressed. He stated that the notebooks contain copies of 16 exhibits . There was proof of posting of the properties. Petitions were submit t ed containing 66 names of owners of 49 properties who were in favor of the request . A plat showing the location of those owners was also submitted . Also submitted were a survey of the parking area, a letter from the National Register of Historic Places Inventory, a letter from the Hampden Hills Baptist Church indicating the activities throughout Sunda ys and other days of the week, and photographs of the property's interior and exterior. He ca lled Mr. Chesler to address the Board, and said he would have othe r witnesses. Mr. Beradini said that the y felt it was b et ter to ask for a variance rather than a rezoning to have better control over the use. He stated that if the use should change, the Board wo uld be able to require th e v a riance t o continue or th e o riginal zoning wo uld apply . Mr. Leonard M. Chesler, 11 Cherrymoor Drive, Englewood, was sworn in for testimony. He stated that five years ago it came t o Mrs. Chesler 's attentio n that the property at 2303 East Dartmouth Avenue was in danger of being torn down. This property had been the Cou ntry Day School for man y years . The Cheslers were able to obtain the building for about $15,000 on condition that the house be moved. Mr. Chesler said that the area is zoned single-family residential, but churches a nd schools are exempt from the zoning requirements. He said that to permit a professional office building in this location would not change the nature of the neighborhood or its traffic pattern s , as there is presently a church nearby a nd the house was once a school. He said that there would be less traffic than in the past . Mr . Ch esler said that the house was not in good condition when they bought it. The Cheslers feel that the house is beautiful and something that should be protected. The Denver Symphony Guild recently sold 35,000 tickets to people who wanted to see the house. He said that he thinks the house is beautiful , but it has caused a financial c risis for him and his family. They had dreamed of living in the house , but will not be able to afford to do so. The Planning Commission granted a subdivision waiver so that they could move the house further back on the land on property wh ich was owned by the Hampden Hills Baotist Church. The Cheslers bought land on the corner of Dartmouth and University in an L shape , with the actual corner becoming a parking lot for the Church. That waiv r would permit one leg of the L, the property north of the Church and facing University, to be sold. He said there is a real possibility that the bank will foreclose on the property. Mr. Chesler said the house and property have been listed with seve ral excellent real estat companies. There wer offers made, but each of them was unacceptable morally t o th Cheslers. It was important to Mrs. Chesler, having had the house placed on historical designation in the Stat and being ace pted on the National Re gister of Historical Properties designated by the Department of Interior, that the hous be preserved. Mrs. Chesler wanted to sell to people who would keep the property in good condition , and Mr. Chesler did not want to bring questionable peopl into the neighborhood where they had h oped to live. When they h d offers from rehabilitation schools for troubled people and a church of a Satanic cult, those offers were turned down. The Cheslers had th property studi d by a real estate and energy investment company which looked at the off rs mad on the property, talked to the realtors, test markPted th property. nd did traffic studies. They reported that the • I • • • • .. -5- best use would be a hi gh level professional office. This is the reason the variance was sought. These offices would be accommodated in this building, not in a new structure. He said that in this way the hist o rical and beautiful building would be preserved, and the neighborhood would barely n otice the change, because little traffic would be added. There would be approximately eight offices housed in the building. He said that if the bank takes over the house, the bank will not be interested in preserving the house or pro- tecting the neighborhood. Mr. Gage asked how many suites would be accommodated. Mr. Ch sler said th planners think about eight would be built, with few alterations to the exterior except as required by Building Codes and requested by the neighbors . Mr. Brown expressed his concern about the landscapin g and what will be done if the variance is granted. Mr. Chesler said that because of the financial situation in which the Cheslers have found themselves with interest cos ts of $260 per day, they have n o t been able to ca re for the landscaping as they would have wished. If the professional offices are a break-even project, the professional environment will require good landscaping. The property has been vandalized in the past. He hopes that the project will be aesthetically pleasing. He cannot afford at the present time to do the landscaping himself. Mr. Seymour stated that he would include in the motion that the berm be removed, the grounds landscaped, and tall trees planted for sc reenin g . He asked if Mr. Chesler could afford to do that as well as bring the building up to Code. Mr. Chesler said those conditions were brought up by the neighbors, and will be incorporated in the plan. He cannot afford to do those things at the present, but with the variance the investors will be responsible for the landscaping as a term of the variance permitting the offices. Mr . Gage asked, if the variance limits the professional offices to architects and lawyers, would there be a problem with getting those people to invest. Mr. Chesler said that he would either have to reapply, or lose the variance. He said that the plan is that each of the occupants would actually own a part of the building in a condominium arrangement for tax purposes. They would be investing capital in the property. There could be a primary investor who would rent or lease to architects or lawyers. Mr. Chesler said that his advisors say this is feasible. Mr. Seymour asked if engineers were included. Mr. Johnson said the plan had been changed to exclude engineers. Mr. Fish asked if Mr. and Mrs. Chesler were involved in placing the house on the National Register. Mr. Chesler said that his wife and a friend did all the preparation, and he did the actual presentation at two public gatherings. He said that three years before the house had received the State Award for Excellence in Restoration, which is seldom awarded to a house outside Denver. Mr. Ferguson asked what is gained by listing property on the National Register. Mr. Chesler said that a certain percentage of the renovation money is a direct deduction from taxes. He had such a break in 1981 of about $20,000. If a business is operated from that property, a 100% direct deduction is available for the historical renovation costs. There is a better benefit to a business than to a residential use. Grants are also available; although when they applied, their application was not sucessful. He was doubtful if the building could be torn down. There we r e no further questions • • I • • • • • • -6- Larry S. Johnson, 585 East Jamison Place, Little ton, CO 80122, was sworn in for testimony. He said that he and his associate, Dr. Egan, had been requested to evaluate the house and the financial condition of the Cheslers because of the house. He said that in three years of intensive effort, the property had not sold as a residence. The house is not in a good location for this kind of house. The house must bring $700,000, and in this neighborhood it will not. Granting the variance will not bring a profit to the Cheslers, it will only minimize the loss. It has a disaster value t o the bank; as a professional office use, there is a different financial picture. There canno t be an office building without the varian c e. Three yea r s have been spent trying to sell the house as a single-family residence, and there has not been a buyer found. Mrs. Chesler tried to preserve historical value, and thought that she was doing the right thing . What she had expected to cost $115,000 for buying the house and moving it has turned into a $700,000 disaster. They are trying to bring economic sense to the situation in a way that will not damage the neighbor- hood. They are planning eight office suites, each suite being occupied by one architect or lawyer, with a total of between six a nd eight staff members; this would put between 14 and 16 people on the property at any o ne time. Mr. Johnson said that Mrs. Chesler had not known of the unhappiness of the neighbors before the r ecent meeting, but she had only intended to preserve a beautiful old house. The varianc e would permit the investors to improve the house and to improve the situation in the neighborhood. He said that it is possible and legal for the house to be torn down. There are 2~ acres on the site and six single-family homes could be built on the property, and this would only compound the financial problem. The bank will sell to anyone who makes an offer, re ga rdless of the kind of person who will take over the property. Mr. Seymour asked what kind of client traffic there would be. He said there should not be a large volume of traffic whic h would have a ne gligible influence especially when compared to the nearby church. There would be no traffic after 5:00 p.m. or on weekends. Mr. Johnson said that the worst case would be 48 clients spread over an eight hour day. They had eliminated engineers from the request because there may be a higher traffic pattern with the engineers. Mr. Brown asked about parking spaces. Mr. Johnson said there are 18,000 square feet of ground availabl to the north of the property. Whatever is the least abusive parking material will be used, and there is room for at least 50 cars, and they only expect a need for 15 to 20 parking spaces at any one time. There should be no problem, a nd it can be kept away from the other residences. Mr. Gage asked if there were people planning on moving into the building if the variance is granted. Mr. Johnson said there are investors who would be willing to buy into a limited partnership because of the specific tax advantages that the partnership would provide. They do not have specific tenants because it cannot be displayed as an office at the present time. Mr. Fish asked if th property would be sold or if there would be a limited partnership. Mr s. Johnson said either way the ownership would change, although the Cheslers, be cause of th ir love for the house, might be part of a limited partnership. Mr. Fish said that the testimony depends on the Chesler's retaining ownership. Mr. Johnson s id that th Cheslers have devoted themselves to this house. If th bank has th house, the odds are that the house will be sold to sorn body wh o will not maintain th house or consider the n ighborhood. The Cheal rs woul d like to s e the residence mold d into som thing perman nt . I • ( • • • • • -7- Mr. Fish said the Cheslers will probably lose a substantial amount of control if they sell; and if the variance is g ranted, the future owners will be bound by the conditions attached to the variance. Mr. Johnson said he understood that. Mr. Ferguson asked if Mr. Johnson was saying that if the variance is gran t ed , the property could be sold, but if it is not granted the property cannot be sold. Mr. Johnson said tha t was correc t. There were no further questions. Edie Marks, 6562 South Pontiac Court, Englewood, CO was s worn in for testimony . She said she is the realtor who for the past ten months has bee n marketing the Chesler property for Dawson and Company. She said it became a labor of love for her . The Cheslers have rejected contracts that would have relieved the financial straits of the Cheslers and agreed with the decision even though she and her company were denied fi nancial rewards, be cause those buyers would have changed or destroyed the nature of the property. The Lane Foundation wanted to house approximately 25 children who had been abandoned or abused by their families. The International School went through a lengthy process to get the property for use as a school. Churches and restaurants have applied. There were offers to make the house a public house similar to the Phipps Mansion; however, it it were to be used for public functions, the neighbors feared that their lives would be disrupted. She said the offers were never really put together because of the basic cost of the house and because many of the changes would have been in conflict with the zoning laws, building codes and fire codes . Even though the Cheslers have exceeded codes in renovating the mansion, changes would have to be made to the structure if any use other than residential were contemplated. She said that with 35,000 people touring the house with the Symphony Guild, there was not a residential offer, even though the for sale signs were posted at that time, and even though pictures and stories were in all the papers and magazines. The house has not been sold for a residential use because the price is high, the upkeep is high and so are the Public Service bills. There is no airconditioning. There are major expenses to taking care of a property like that. People who buy $700,000 houses like to be surrounded by homes of nearly equal value, and the houses around this house are worth from $150,000 to $200,000. There were no further questions. Lily Vranesic, 4010 South Logan, was sworn in for testimony. She said she has been a resident of Englewood for 46 years and has seen the City g row. She watched the Country Day School and the deterioration of this house. She watched the house being moved and watched the improvements and care that Mrs. Chesler gave to the house. It is an historical house and Englewood is honored to have it. Mr. Fish asked if she lived near the house. She said she does not. Ray Berlin, 2132 East Dartmouth, was sworn in for testimony. He said that he has lived in Englewood for 10 years and lives on East Dartmouth Avenue. He said that the traffic is heavy and there is a great deal of speeding. 48 or SO cars would make an insignificant impact on the area. He said it is a beautiful house. Any church could take up residence in this house without a variance. Only successful professionals can afford the price of a unit in this house. He said that the Cheslers had made the mistake of falling in love with a house and did not protect themselves. He said he respected them for not taking th first offer that would have solved their financial diffic ulties. He said, in his opinion, the use of this property as a professional office seems good if there are controls on what changes can be mad • There were no questions. Kurt Suppes, 2108 East Dartmouth Circle, was sworn in for testimony. H said that he liv a on th Circle to th w st of the house, and he was originally I • • • • • -8- opposed to the granting of the variance. After talking with the Cheslers and hearing some of the alternatives that could be moved onto the property, they changed their minds. They feel that this would be the best use of the property. The bank can do anything profitable with the property. He said he would hate to see the financial problems of the Cheslers compounded with the lower property values which may result from people moving into the neighborhood who have no regard for the ne ighbors. There were n o more submitted a letter City and County of Chesler property. the variance . speakers in favor of granting the variance. Mrs. Romans from John A. Harris, City Planner, Neighborhood Section, Denver, which expressed support for the change in use for the (Exhibit XIII) There were no further speake rs in favor of The Chairman reces sed the meeting at 9:31 p .m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:43p.m ., with the same members present. The Chairman asked if there were any speakers in opposition to the variance. Harold Bremers, 2292 East Dartmouth, was sworn in. He stated that his wife and he belong to the Denver Historic Society and they have a great interest in the area and in history. They do not want the character of their neighborhood changed. He said he is sorry for the Cheslers, but he also has money invested . The Cheslers have not taken care of the property, but Mr. Bremers mowed the lawn and watered for over a month, and then was not able to continue. The Cheslers did not use the sprinkler system provided by the Symphony Guild. He said that our area has the highest rate of office vacancies in the United States, and this is an inconvenient location for an office for a lawyer or architect. Few lawyers or architects could afford such an expensive office. The fear of unsuitable tenants is unnecessary, as the structure is not suitable due to modern zoning and codes. He asked that his neighborhood be left as it is and asked that the variance be denied. Mr. Brown asked if Mr. Bremers was aware that a school or church could be put in the structure without a variance. Mr. Bremers said the building is unsuitable and the "Zoning Board" said they c ould not function in this building. The Fire Codes also would not permit its use without substantial alterations. Mr. Ferguson stated that if the loan is forfeit, the building might be torn down and a school built. Mr. Bremers said that "would be preferable to the mess that is there now." Frank Velzen, 2270 East Columbia Place, Denver 80210, was sworn in for testimony. He said that he has lived in the neighborhood for 17 years and purchased his property expecting a church or school at the subject site since this is a residential area. While he sympathized with the Cheslers ' financial problems, there are other people wh o could feel financial pressures too because of the choices made by the Cheslers. The value of their homes is also at stake. The Cheslers have neglected the yard around their home and have caused their neigh- bors extra time and money spP.nt on maintenance for their own homes. Mr. Velzen asked what kind of controls could be put on the professionals who move into this hom , and also o n the people who might work for them. He asked who would monitor the situation so that no one but lawyers and architects would have offices in th building. He asked who would clean the offices and at what times, and who would want to have their hours defined for them by a variance. He also was concerned that the limit d partnership might fail and the property be back in trouble . I • • ( ( • • • .. -9- Mr. Velzen said that the love of the Cheslers for the house was not the reason for moving the structure, and questioned the reasons the Cheslers obtained the historical designation for the house. He said th at he is affected by the decisions of the Board and the Chesler s . He has lived with the berms: there is a drainage problem t ha t would affect the property to the north if the berm is removed. He said he was con cerned about the property maintenance in the future. Mr. Velzen said it wo uld be difficult to limit the number o f persons who c ould work in each of eight offices . He said it is purely speculative as to how many clients might b e present at any given time . He asked if the limited partner ship might increase the size of the bu ilding . Mr. Fish asked what Mr. Velzen would like t o see do ne with the property. Mr . Velzen said they should allow it t o revert to the bank who would be required to use it as a single-fa mily dw elling . Mr. Brown asked how the adjoining property owners h ad been forced to spend money on their property due to t he Che sler property. Mr. Velzen said he put time, effort and money on his own lawn taking care of the constant weeds which have blown on to his lawn, and spent hours on the telephone calling the City of Englewood asking tha t the weeds be c ut. He stated that he h as sprayed the berms so the weed s would not blow into his yard. Sol Tucker, 2204 East Dartmouth Ci r cle was sworn in. He s t ated that h e has been treated badly by the owners of the property; he has been looking at the weed patch for five years. He has called the Cit y many times t o have the weeds cut, but even when they were c ut, they were allowed t o grow back. He said it was hard for him t o believe tha t th e Cheslers are concerned about the neighborhood. He presented a list signed by some of the neighbors asking that certain things be required if a variance is g r a nted. This list stated: "Several of th e neighb ors whose property is closes t to the building in question respe c tfully subm i t this list of improvements that we feel would enhance the propert ies involved in the event the variance is granted. These things to be done befo r e occupancy: No further buildings s u c h as a ga rage or covered parking. I n stallatio n of cu rbing along Dartmo uth Avenue. Removal of berm. Installation of a long gr eenb elt approximately 30 feet wid e along the fence line of the neighbors . Plant trees and s hrubs close to the house particularly on the west side in order to give more sun for gardens and yards of those living in Dartmouth Circle. Such planting would also give more privacy for occupants of the house in question. Paint building an eye-pleasing subdued color. Continual maintenance of grounds and building equal to surrounding residences." Mr. Gage asked if those conditions wer e attached to the variance, would Mr. Tucker support the granting of the variance. He said he would no longer object. The Chairman asked if there were any further speakers in opposition. Mr. Harold Dwyer, 2302 East Dartmouth, was sworn in. He said he was not really opposed to granting the variance but is concerned about further deterioration of property values. After the structure was moved, he said, property values were lowered. His main objection has been the berm. There was an effort made to fence in the front, and bricks were stored for two years on the property. The berms are full of weeds, however, there may be a drainage problem without them. He would not object if the list submitted by the previous speaker was included as conditions for the variance . • I • • • • • -10- Mr. Dwyer stated that nobody wants the building torn down or to continue to deteriorate . It has been neglected. He arranged for some workers to mow, and Mrs. Chesler agreed to pay them, but the mowers did not continue, and the grounds continued to deteriorate. Mr. Hallagin asked if the runoff couldn't be used for irrigation. Mr. Dwyer said it might, but the removal of the berm on that side would not solve the problem. Mr. Brown said that a variance would be void if the conditions were not followed. He emphasized that there is a problem for all the neighborhood, not just the Cheslers. Edwa r d J. White, 2208 East Dartmouth Circle, Englewood, was sworn in for testimony. He said everyone on Dartmouth Circle, who faces this "giant white building", signed the petition asking for those conditions to be attached to the variance. He said that the white reflects the glaring sun at night, and the building keeps the morning sun from his house. There were no further speakers, but there were five other people in the audience in opposition to granting the variance. Mrs . Romans submitted a letter from George Bodley, 2300 East Columbia Place, Denver, CO 80210, opposing the variance (Ex . XV). The Chairman asked if there was any rebuttal. Mr. Beradini said that Mr. Johnson would like to respond. Mr. Johnson returned to the podium and stated that many problems occurred with the move of the house and with its maintenance. There have been many constructive suggestions made by the neighbors, and they will be accommodated if the variance is approved. He stated that the Cheslers ar a better alternative than the bank. Mr. Seymour asked about the berms. Mr. Johnson said that the berms have created problems. The neighborhood wants the berms removed or moved closer to the house. He said that a 30 foot greenbelt is a little harsh, but 18 feet would be acceptable. He said that the drainage would have to be approved, and a landscape plan approved. They will do what is the general consensus of the neighborhood. He thought that the maintenance of the berms was more of a problem than the berms themselves. He said the berms do provide insulation to the neighbors. Mr. Gage asked where they would put trees. Mr. Johnson said it might be on top of the berm for additional shelter or not on the top of the berm because it would further block the sun. He said he would suggest putting trees on top of the berm. Harold Dwyer suggested that the Board ask if Mr. Chesler would relocate his law offices to the mansion. Mr. Chesler said that he would like to be a limited partner or a general partner. At the present time his practice would not fit the plans for the house, as it is a criminal practic and he has fiv lawyers responsible to him, each of whom has a support person. In the future there might be modifications in his practice, and he might be putting more emphasis on national lecturing, and the offices planned might suit his smaller practice. Mr. Gage asked what type of lawyer would practice out of this building. Mr. Chesler said that som one who has be n succ ssful, a pensioned judge, for instance, with a limited practic lookin toward retir m nt, and who would I • • - ( ( • • • -11- like to own rather than rent. Also, prospective tenants might be young legal representatives of banks and financial institutions where the majority of the conferences are done on the c lient's premises rather than on the lawyer's. Mr. Fish asked what would happen if the limited partnership fails. Mr. Chesler said what would happen to it in case of failure is what would happen to it now if the variance is denied. The financial institution would reposs ess and sell the proeprty. He said that he believes that this partnership will s ucceed . There were no further questions. The Chairman included the Staff Report in the Record. There were no additional staff comments. The Chairman closed the Public Hearing . BOARD MEMBER SEYMOUR MOVED THAT IN CASE NO. 23-84, LEONARD M. CHESLER BE GRANTED A VARIANCE FOR 2303 EAST DARTMOUTH AVENUE TO PERMIT THE USE OF THE STRUCTURE AND PREMISES AS A PROFESSIONAL OFFICE BUILDING FOR OCCUPANCY BY ATTORNEYS AND/OR ARCHITECTS. THIS IS A VARIANCE FROM THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 22.4-2 b -PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. THE OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE WILL NOT BE ALTERED. IF AN OUTSIDE STAIRWAY IS REQUIRED BY CODE TO ACCOMMODATE OCCUPANCY OF THE UPPER FLOOR, THE STAIRWAY SHALL BE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, AWAY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. 2. THE RE-USE MAY NOT GENERATE A HIGH VOLUME OF TRAFFIC AND THE USE SHALL BE OPERATED DURING REGULAR DAYTIME OFFICE HOURS DURING THE WORK WEEK. 3. OFF-STREET PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED ON-SITE TO THE NORTH OF THE HOUSE TO MINIMIZE VISABILITY BY THE PEOPLE ON THE WEST AND SHALL BE SCREENED. 4. THE "BERM" ON THE WEST SIDE OF TH E PROPERTY SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE GROUNDS LANDSCAPED WITH PROPER AND ADEQUATE APPROVED DRAINAGE TO BE PROVIDED. TALL TREES SHALL BE PLANTED NEAR THE WEST SIDE OF THE STRUCTURE RATHER THAN BY THE WEST PROPERTY LINE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A PRIVACY SCREEN WITHOUT BLOCKING THE SUN FROM THE HOMES OF THE RESIDENTS TO THE WEST. 5. CURB, GUTTER, AND SIDEWALK WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EAST DARTMOUTH AVENUE AND THE PAVING ON EAST DARTMOUTH AVENUE WILL BE TAKEN OVER TO THE CURB AND GUTTER. THIS WILL BE AT THE PROPERTY OWNER'S EXPENSE. 6 . IF THIS USE IS VACATED IN THE FUTURE, NO USE OF THE BUILDING OTHER THAN AS A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WILL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY AN AGENCY OF THE CITY FOLLOWING A PUBLIC HEARING. 7. IN ADDITION, THERE WILL HAVE TO BE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL THE APPLICABLE CODES BEFORE THE BUILDING COULD BE OCCUPIED. 8. NO ADVERTISING WILL BE PERMITTED EXCEPT ONE IDENTIFICATION SIGN NO LARGER THAN PERMITTED UNDER THE SIGN CODE. Board Member Fish seconded the motion. Discussion followed, and the members vot d. Th m mbers gave their findings as follows: • • I • • - • • • • -1 2- Mr. Seymour said that this seems t o be the highest and best us e . He s aid t ha t he believes that for all concerned this solution is better than what mi ght happen without the variance . He said that some of the property owners sign e d petitions for and a g ainst the variance . He said the six po ints wer e an s we red: 1 . The variance will do substantial justic e to all. If it is a pro fitable piece of property and properly maintai ned, a nd there is a l ow-tra f f ic use, the neighborhoo d will be b e tter than it is now , o r mi ght be und e r a no th er use . 2. That there be unique c onditions no t brought on by the owners a nd no t d ue to the general c onditions o f the district in which the prope rty is loca t ed . He said that this is a unique house, it is an historical bui l ding . 3. A reasonable return could not be yielded. Th e pro pert y cann o t b e so l d as a single family house. There is not only a lack o f return, th e re i s a loss . 4. The variance will not weaken the general purpose o f the o rdinan ce . Th e r e are no similar house s , and this i s a uniqu e si tua t ion. 5. The variance will not alter the essential c harac ter o f the district. He said that given the maintenanc e on the pr o pe rty , making this a pay ing property should ma k e pro pe r ma int e nance possible , a nd i mpr ove the n e ighborhoo d. 6. The variance will not injure a dj ace nt conf o rming prope rties. If the conditions of the varianc e a re me t, i t will i mpr ov e the ne ighbori ng pro pert ies. 7. There is a hardship f inancially , a nd this h a rd s hip ext e nds to the wh o l e neighborhood. Mr. Hallag in voted "yes " becau se t here were 49 people who signe d t he peti t ion i n favor of granting the v a r ian ce, wi th 15 agains t. There were , however , people who signed both p e t i tion s , a nd some of th e peo p le again s t the var iance said that they would approve i f th e co nd i t ion s we r e adde d . He said the r e was a hard s h i p. There will be plenty of pa rk i ng , and t r a f fic s ho u ld not b e a pr oblem. Th e six c onditions neces sary fo r gr a nt i ng a v a ria nce we re me t, a nd the va r iance should he lp the neighb orhood. Mr. Brown s a i d he v o t ed "yes" because the conditions give protection to t he neighborhood , a nd because the six condition s necessa r y for the granting of a varian ce we r e me t . He said there was a hardship; he would prefer single-family use, but it doesn 't seem possible. There will be control over th office building in the futu r e and the neighborhood will be improved . Mrs. Dawso n voted "yes" because the house is presently deter iorating. It cannot b sold the way it is , as no one can afford to use this as a single-family horne . If the neighbors and Cheslers will work toge t her, the problems can be work d out. There is a h a r dship for the family and the ordinance will not be weakened by granting the v ariance. Mr. Fish voted "yes" becaus th re was no real alternative. The variance seemed to b the only viable possiblity. He said that th variance will do just ice to all and will upg r ade the prop rty. Th circumstances ar unique d ue to t he location and limited use. No r asonable use can be obtain d if the prope r ty r mains a single-family hom . Th ordinance will not b w akened because t h situ tion is un ique. Whil th property will b conv rted to comm rcial use, it will not affect th n ighborhood, as the building its lf will not b alt r d • I • • - ( ( • • • • -13- to any great xtent. This will not permanently injure th e n ighboring propertie , but wi ll enhance them by eliminating a substant ial probl Mr. Fer uson aid h bad to disagree with the other member . H said that th varianc will do justice only to Mr. Chesler . The Ch sler s created the problem, which is economic. The variance will convert the highest, s t restrictive use, R-1-A, into an office building. He did fe 1 that th a r ea might not be negatively altered, but stated that tearing down th hous and building single-family homes would improve the neighb orhood. He said he thought that 20 -40 cars parked in a neighborhood might affec t the prop rty values. Mr. Gage stated that he voted "yes" because the applicant did meet the six conditions . There is a hardship. The conditions put on the variance will protect the neighborhood, and he said that the offices should not do any harm to the neighborhood. While he would n ot want a high-rise or commercial store, this would benefit all of Englewood. When the votes were revealed, six members one, Mr. Ferguson, voted in the negative. was granted. The Chairman instructed the Department for the necessary permits. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE. had voted in the affirmative, and The Chairman ruled the variance applicant to go to the Building Mrs. Romans said that at the Monday City Council meeting the Fence Ordinance was approved, the I-1 Ordinance was adopted, and the B-1 maximum height was changed from 60 feet to 100 feet. There are other sections which have not yet been approved, but they hope that by spring all of the Ordinance will be in place. BOARD'S CHOICE. There were no speakers from the Board. The meeting adjourned at 11:08 p.m. Sheryl Rousses, Rec o rding Secretary • _____ ____::J ....... v In I • • - ( ( • • ( • • • WATER AND SEWER BOARD August 24, 1984 Regular Meeting ( SF The meeting was called to order at 5:02 p.m. The Chairman declared a quorum present. Members present: Members absent: Also present: Best, Fullerton, Resley, Higday, Otis, Lay, Gulley, Vobejda None Stewart Fonda Director of Utilities 1) DARTMOUTH INDUSTRIAL PARK/WELBOURNE PROPERTY. Stewart Fonda reviewed the memorandum from Peter Vargas, Acting City Manager for Englewood dated July 18, 1984 and a letter from George Rupert of the City and County of Denver dated August 13, 1984, discussing the Welbourn'e Dartmouth Industrial Park. Alternative courses of action were discussed. The Board concurred that Mr. Fonda should send Welbourne a registered letter explaining the Englewood Utilities' Department position. No motion was made. 2) MINUTES OF THE JULY 10, 1984 MEETING. The Englewood Water and Sewer Board Minutes of July 10, 1984 were approved as written. Mr. Fullerton moved; Mr. Resley seconded: Ayes: Nays : Motion carried . To approve the July 10, 1984 meeting minutes as written. Best, Fullerton, Resley, Higday, Otis, Lay, Gulley, Vobejda None Page 1 of 4 • () I . - r • • • • • ( ( 3) COUNTY LINE LANDFILL -CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT. The Board received a copy of the fully executed Connector's Agreement with County Line Landfill. Mr. Fonda explained the agreement states County Line will receive space in the plant, but it is not a permanent committment. This arrangement does not affect South Arapahoe's allocation. 4) RESIGNATION OF ELEANOR HAVILAND. Eleanor Haviland's letter of resignation was accepted by the Water and Sewer Board. The Board wishes Eleanor success with her move to Michigan. 5) KAMPHAUSEN/McLELLAN RESOLUTION. The Board was given a copy of the Council Communication that was passed by Council approving an easement held by Karnphausen in connection with Mclellan Reservoir. The original agreement is not formally complete until the grant of an easement for access is given. The easement fulfills the obligation of the City. 6) 1984 ABANDONED WATER RIGHTS. Mr. Fonda discussed the 19B4 Lists of Abandoned Water Rights with the Board. Mr. Ron Blatchley with Blatchley and Associates will be investigating the list to see which rights would affect Englewood and if they would be worth pursuing. Blatchley will prepare a report which will be discussed at a future meeting. 7) LICENSE AGREEMENT -SOUTHPARK FILING #5. A License Agreement for an 8" sanitary sewer was submitted by the 3190 Corp. This is to install a sanitary sewer line across the City's right-of-way for the City Ditch located at SouthPark Filing #5 near Dad Clark Gulch. Mclaughlin Water Engineers recommended some provisions be complied with before approval is given, as outlined in their July 10, 1984 letter. Mayor Otis recommended; Mr. Resley seconded: To recommend to Council approval of the License Agreement for the 3190 Corp. for an 8" sanitary sewer at SouthPark Filing #5. This is con- tingent upon the provisions outlined in Mclaughlin Water Engineer's letter of July 10, 1984, being fulfilled. Page 2 of 4 • I • - ( • ( Ayes: Nays: Motion carried. • • • ( Best, Fullerton, Resley, Higday, Otis, Lay, Gulley, Vobejda None B) NEW POLICY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF HOMES USING OLD WATER TAP SERVICE LINES. The new policy for construction of homes using old water tap service lines was given to the· Board. The new policy requires replacement of the service line where an old home is being removed to construct a new home, if the service line is 20 years old. Any service less than 20 years old should be excavated at the tap on the main and at the curb stop for inspection from this department to determine if lowering or replacement is required. 9) URBAN DRAINAGE AND FLOOD CONTROL RESULUTION NO. 34. The Urban Drainage and Flood Control Resolution No. 34 was discussed. The resolution is part of the Railroad Depression project to construct the section of Little's Creek drainage and flood control facilities from Prince Street to Bemis Street. 10) LETTER FROM CITY OF LITTLETON REGARDING McLELLAN TRAINING EXERCISES. The City of Littleton submitted an agreement for using Mclellan Reservoir for the purpose of training a team for underwater search and recovery operation. The Board recommended that the same agreement be submitted, but instead of a specific date, stating "on any day which is mutually agreed upon in advance by the parties." Mr. Fullerton moved; Ms. Gulley seconded: Ayes: Nays: Motion carried. To approve the agreement with the City of Littleton for the purpose of training a team for underwater search and recovery operations on August 25, 1984. Best, Fullerton, Resley, Higday, Otis, Lay, Gulley, Vobejda None Page 3 of 4 • I . • ( • • • • ( 11) SHERMAN TANK WATER TOWER. Stewart Fonda discussed the Colorado Supreme Court decision to remand the case back to Littleton District Court. The Supreme Court has ordered the case reheard in Littleton District Court, taking into consideration the City Council's 1983 amendment exempting the City from zoning regulations. 12) WATER AND SEWER BOARD ANNUAL FIELD TRIP. The Board discussed the date and what to tour during the Water and Sewer Board's annual field trip. The trip will be either September 15 or September 22, 1984. The Board will be notified of the exact time and date. 13) BUDGET. Stewart Fonda reviewed the budget and financial state of the Utilities Fund. The meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m. The next Englewood Water and Sewer Board meeting will be held September 11, 1984 at 5:00 p.m. in the Library Conference Room. Respectfully submitted, az;~ Cathy Burrage Recording Secretary City of Englewood Page 4 of 4 I • • • • • • CITY 01' ENGLEWOOD PLANNIN G AND ZONING COHMISSlON Septemb e r 5, 1984 I. CALL TO ORDER. The r egula r meet i n g o f the City Planning and Zonin g Commission was ca lled to order b y Chairman Be c ker a t 7:00 p.m. Hembers present: Carson, Magnuson, Allen, St oe l, Tanguma, Venard, Barbre, Becke r. Peter Var gas, Acting Director of Communit y Developmen t, Ex Officio. Members absent: McBrayer. Also present: D. A. Romans, Assistant Director of Commun i t y Deve l opmen t Susan King, Senior Planner Jack Olsen, City Attorney IT. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. August 22, 1984 Chairman Becker stated that the Minutes of August 22, 1984 , were t o b e consider ed for approval. Carson moved: Tanguma seconded: The Minutes of August 22, 1984, be approved as writ ten. AYES : NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Barbre, Tanguma, Carson, Magnuson, Stoel, Venard, Allen. None . Becker. McBrayer. Th e motion carried. III. FINDINGS OF FACT. Conditional Use for 50 West Belleview. Carson moved: Ca se 112 8-84 Magnuson seconded: The Findings of Fact for Case 028-84 be approved. AYES: NAYS: Barbre, Tanguma, Carson, Magnuson, Stoel, Becker, Venard and Allen. None. ABSENT: McBrayer. The motion carried. IV. AMENDMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. 5200 South Broadway. Carson moved: Tanguma seconded: The Public Hearing for Case #31-84 be opened. Case 1131-84 AYES: NAYS: Barbre, Tanguma, Carson, Magnuson, Stoel, Venard, Allen, Becker. Non e. ABSENT: McBrayer. The motion was carried . • I • • • • • -2- Chairman Becker stated that she had proof of posting and publication, and asked if there were any questions from the Commissioners concerning the Staff Rep o rt. Th e re were no questions from the Commissione rs and no additions to the report b y the Staff. Mr. Dale Boyd 9 50 South Cherry, Denver, CO 80222 -was sworn in, and testified that he is representing the d eve lope r, Mr. Zeff. He stated that the Broadway Development Plan approved by the En g lewoo d City Council on July 12, 1984, called for a mixture of cond ominium and townhom e development . The c u rrent market would better support only cond ominium development . They , therefore, requested approval of a change in the Developme nt Plan . William Baer 2910 East 6th Avenue, Denver -was sworn in, and testified th a t h e is a repre- sentative of Baer Hickman Archite c ts. Mr. Baer stated that the original plan contained looped roadway and 24 buildings , 17 of which were to be townhouses. Th e new plan will decrease the number of buildings, eliminate townhou ses, and provide 312 instead of 290 unit s . There will be only six buildings replacing the 17 buildings which would h ave been devoted to townhouses, and there wi ll be n o buildings on the extreme east of the site adjacent t o the properties having frontage on Sunset Lane. Dr. Ro y Lininger 5 Sunset Lane, Littleton -was sworn in, and testified that h e is representing re sidents direc tly east of the development. They have no objection to the n ew plan because the developer is screening with a privacy fence. The increased number of units will increase traffic, however, and the neighborhood group would like this monitored. Irene Dubois 6 Sunset Lane, Littleton -was sworn in, and testified that she own s property adjoining the project. She said she did not object to the plan, but she asked if the roofline would be different. Mr. Baer stated that the buildings would be further away than the ones in the original plan, and t he roof line of the closest building would be well below --about 30 feet below --Mrs. Dubois' first floor. Mr. Tanguma noted that the new plan would raise density while decreasing parkin g space. Mr. Baer said that the condominium s would h ave many one bedroom units, which should attract fewer people than might have moved into the two bedroom townhouses. They are expecting to have about the same number of p eople as would have been provided for in the old plan. They are well within the requirements for parking spaces. There were n o further que stions from the Public, Commis sion or Staff. Carson moved: Stoel seconded; That the Public Hearing for Case Number 31-84 b e closed. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Barbre, Tanguma, Car on, Magnuson, Stoel, Venard, Allen, Be cker. None. McBray r. Th motion carri d. • • I • • , • • • -J- Carson moved: Stoel seconded: The Broadway Development Plan for 5200 South Broadway be amended as shown on the Development Plan dated August JO, 1984. The conditions attac~ed to the original plan will still apply. These conditions are: 1. The drive lanes shall be designated as "fire lanes" as determined by the Fire Marshal. 2. The proposed design of the water system for fire protection purposes must be submitted on blueprints and approved prior to permit issuance for building construction. J. The water system for this property must be designed to supply enough water to meet the required fire flow calculations (ISO) for the largest, most severely exposed structure in the development and must provide an adequate number of on-site fire hydrants, as determined by the Fire Chief. (Section 10-JOl (c), 1982 Uniform Fire Code.) 4. 5. 6. 7 0 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. All fire hydrants and access roads must be usable immediately prior t o and during any construction involving combustible materials. (Section 10-JOl (d), 1982 Uniform Fire Code.) All streets are to be built to City standards. The South Broadway Big Dry Creek bridge should be widened with adequate acceleration and deceleration lanes and a center storage lane for south- bond traffic exiting from site . The street providing access to the site should be named as per metro area grid system. Egress from the site may be limited to right-turn only if the number of accidents increase at this intersection. The 100-foot drainage easement should be expanded, where necessary, to include the entire Big Dry Creek channel to the top of the bank. A maintenance access right across the private drives and parking lots as well as two ramps from the top of the bank to the channel bottom should be provided to the Urban Drainage District. The 100-year flood plain limit should be shown on the Development Plan. The flood plain exceeds the channel limits at the south end of the property and should be so documented. Initial maintenance responsibility for the channel must be established. Urban Drainage and Flood Control must approve design plans for any flood control facilities to be constructed if the facilities are to be eligible for District maintenance assistance. Discussion followed. As amended 9/11~ • I • • • • • - -4- AYES: NAYS: Magnuson, Stoe l, Venard, Allen, Barbre, Tanguma, Carson, Becker. None. ABSENT: McBrayer. The motion carried, and Chairman Becker stated that the amendment to the Plan would be sent to City Council with the Commission's approval. V. PUBLIC FORUN. No one in the audience wished to speak; however, there were several persons present, and Mrs. Becker stated that there would soon be openings on the Cit y Bo ards and Commissions, and suggested that people present might be interested in applying for those opening s. VI. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE. Mrs. Romans said that the WHERE organization had received financin g for the first parcel for the Mobile Homes Park. There would be a Planned Development filed only if new land is added. Mrs. Romans asked if the Commission \JOuld like a note of congratulations sent. The Commission agreed. Mrs. Romans anno unced a breakfast meetin g on the 17th of September at 7:30 a.m. at Swedish Hospital. Mr. Carson said he would not be able to attend. Mrs. Romans said she had not been able to contact Mr. McBra y er. She said the Commissioners would be called to r em ind them of the meeting. Mrs. Romans said that the Grease Monkey had given the quit-claim deed for the right-of-way, as required by the Commission. She stated that the Fence Ordinance will become law on October 5, and the Fairgrounds property has been zoned. Mrs. Becker stated that there was a rumour that the previous owner would not permit the Fairgrounds land to be sold fo r other than public purposes. Mr. Olsen stated that there was no condition attached when that owner sold the land. VII. COMMISSION'S CHOICE. Mrs. Becker said that the vaccuum cleaners on West Hampden Avenue had been removed. Mr. Olsen said that his office is considerin g strengthening the ordinance to help clean problem properties. Mr. Allen said his recent trash bill stated that his rates were being raised due to the expense of transporting and disposing of the trash. Mrs. Becker said that there would be an American Planning Association Commissioner's Worksh o p which will be held the last Friday and Saturday of October at Copper Mountain. The last Friday of September there will be an American Planning As sociation meeting in Fort Collins. She asked if there is an ordinance against large vehicles on residential streets. She said there are large recreation vehicles and Rometimes the vehicles have boats attached; there is a farm truck parked near her home several nights a week. Mr. Olsen said he would look into the matter. Mrs. Becker showed slides of her recent trip to Minneapolis where there is a great deal of downtown development in progress. Th e meeting adjourned at 7:48p.m. c r e t a r y I • • • • • • MINUTES ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD September 11, 1984 5h Chairman Jerry Valdes called the regular meeting of the Library Advisory Board to order at 7:30 p.m. PRESENT : Jerry Valdes, Lois Sterling, Debbie Dix, Bruce Hogue, John Peterson, Al Quaintance, Gerald Sampson, Kay Van Valkenburg REGRETS: ALSO PRESENT: Dorot hy Wheelehan Mrs. Barbara Hogue Sharon Winkle, Director of Libraries Donna Gottberg, Recording Secretary Roll call was taken and a quorum declared present . There were no committee reports. Chairman's Report Mr. Valdes asked if any Board members planned to attend the Colorado Library As- sociation Conference, October 6-9. There was a brief discussion regarding the agenda. Ms . Sterling and Ms. Wheelehan plan to attend on Sunday, the 7th, Ms. VanValkenburg will attend on Monday, the 8th and Mr. Valdes will attend on Saturday, the 6th. Staff member, Karen Kelley, who is on the Public Relations Committee will also attend. No report is available from the Book Sale held September 8-9. It was noted that the sale was very well organized this year. Chairman's Choice The Board expressed that they were favorably impressed by Mr. Smith, the building consultant, and with the draft program. The City has been using his interim draft reports. Mr. Valdes turned the meeting over to Ms. Sharon Winkle for the Director's Report. Ms. Winkle noted that the Fall Reference Staff schedule wa s in force . Through previous surveys, she wa s able to determine peak hours and thus provide more reference personnel during those times. A second phone needs to be installed at the desk to provide better telephone service. In response to a question from Ms. Dix, Ms. Winkle answered that the Healthlink program has been well received. Be ca use of theft of some very expensive books at the beginning of the program, the collection had to b e placed in locked cases , which was something staff members had hoped to avoid. There have been no problems in a nswering health-related questions. There was a brief discussion on the Health collection. continued ••••. I • • • • • • -2- Ms. Winkle detailed the schedule of events for the Library building program, with September 24 being the tentative date for the architect's site evaluation being presented to City Council. The first fourteen pages of the building document from Mr. Smith (the process and design) were then discussed. Ms. Winkle asked that the Board members read this document fully by Friday, the 14th, and report any comments to her by that day. The final site for the Library has not been determined and Ms. Winkl e noted the options that have been under discussion. Ms . Winkle brought forth a Council Communication, dated February 10, 1984, regarding the Central Colorado Library System (CCLS) Reciprocal Borrowing Agreement. She noted that as of October 1, 1984 the intracounty activity will no longer be re- imbursed via this Agreement, thus reducing annual income to the City by approx i mat e l y $3400. She further noted that this change in the CCLS Agreement might affec t the Agreement for Library Services with Arapahoe Regional Library Distric t (ARLO). The 1985 ARLO Agreement has been sent to Council for approval. Because of an interpretation of the enabling legislation for the Metropo litan Library District (MLD), it will not be placed on the ballot at this time. Th e Distric t must be formed first, then it can be voted upon. Update note s from Ms. Winkle .•. Ms. Ann Kelver, Director of the ARLO, is resigning effec tive December 31, 1984. Library staff member, Ms. Ann Trowbridge, will resign as of September 14 to j oin her husband in Boston. Ms. Winkle presented information on both the Library Budget Request and the Board Budget Request. The Library Budget Request includes an automated library manag eme n t system as a status quo item. The electronic security system will be purc ha s ed (no t leased), if approved for f unding. There were a few reductions in c apital and collection materials items . The Board Budg e t Re quest was dec reased by $340 i n the general o ff i c e, postage a nd food i t e ms, but there was no dec rease in the travel and c onference area. Memb e r s ' Ch oice None of o ur Board members attended the Joint Board Heeting at ARLO on August 28. Mr. Quaintance noted the report submitted by Mr . Smith was extremely thorough. Mr. Quaintance presented a resolution {following on next page) regarding the Board's appreciation of Ms. Trowbridge. The Boar d agr eed to the resolution. Ms . Van Valkenburg is glad to be back at the meetings. She was able to take advantage of the Healthlink program this s ummer and fo und it very informative. Ms. Dix, too, is glad to be back attend ing t he meetings and get~ing involved. There was no un finished business. continued •••. • I • - 84-21 • • • • • • -3- The Statistical Report for August was introduced, with Ms. Winkle noting that there are more figures available than those printed, for anyone wishing more in- formation regarding Library activities. She uses the printed figures to show long-term trends in the Library. MOTION: That the Minutes of the August 14, 1984 Meeting be approved as written. ~by: Bruce Hogue Seconded by: Lois Sterling Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:17 p.m • 9-17-8 4 dg I • • - • • • • RESOLVED, that the Englewood Public Library Advisory Board extend sincere thanks to Ann Trowbridge for her tenure of service at the Englewood Public Library, that we commend her for her professional expertise and contribution to the position and, further, we extend our heartfelt best wishes for her future in the Boston area. 9-11-84 • I • • ( • C 0 U N C I l DATE September 26, 1984 • • • C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM (t;O- SUBJECT Cherry Hills Rancho Supplement #3 INITIATED BY Englewood \tlater and Sewer Board ACTION PROPOSED ______ A~p~p_ro_v_a_l __ of __ C_h_er_r~y __ H_il~l~s_R~a~n~c~ho~-------------------- Supplement #3 BACKGROUND A request was made by the Cherry Hills Rancho Water and Sanitation District representing the owner/developer for annexation to the Cherry Hills Rancho Water and Sanitation District area. Inclusion of this land does not increase the tap allocation to Cherry Hills Rancho Water and Sanitation District. a. The subject land parcel is approximately .96 acre in size and is presently zoned R-1 with the proposed zoning to remain the same. b. Legal: See "Ex hibit A" attached to Supplement #3 . c. Owner: Stanley L. Hannah and Betty M. Hannah FINANCIAL DETAILS None. RECOMMENDATION At the September 15, 1984 meeting the Water and Sewer Board recommended that the City Council approve the annexation of the property described in Supplement #3 to the Cherry Hills Rancho Water and Sanitation District. • I • • ( • • • • SUPPLEMENT NO. __3__ TO CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, acting by and through its duly author- ized Mayor and City Clerk, hereinafter referred to as "City,• and CHERRY HILLS RANCHO WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT, Arapahoe County, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "District, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on the 4th day of October, 1971, the City entered into a Connector's Agreement with the District concerning the connection of the District's water distribution and sewer collection facilities to the City'a water supply and sewage systems; and WHEREAS, said Agreement provides that additional service areas can be included within the limits of the District with the written consent of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, it is agreed aa follows: 1. The City does hereby consent to the inclusion of the following described additional area into CHERRY HILLS RANCHO WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT and agrees that said additional area .. y be aarved with the water distribution and sewage system facilities of the District, and that the City will supply water from the City'a facilities for aaid additional area and treat the sewage diacharged into the District's sanitary sewer system and into the City's trunk line from said additional area, all in accordance with the Connector's Agreement between the City and the District aa now constituted. Accordingly, the Exhibit "A" referred to in paragraph 1 of said Connector's Agreement is hereby amended to include the follow i ng additional real property, situate in Arapahoe County, Colorado, to wit : Petitioners• Name : Pet i tioners• Addresa: Stanley L. Hannah and Betty H. Hannah See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference • • I • • l - • • • • • • 2. Except for the agreements set forth in paragraph 1 hereinabove, each and every other proviaion of said Connector's Agreeaent remaina unchanged and continues in full force and effect, and the additional area hereinabove included shall be aubject to all the terms and agreeaenta contained in aaid Connector'• Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the partie• hereto have cauaed their namea and aeals to be hereunto aubacribed and affixed thia __ day of ATTEST: clty cierk (SEAL) ,, ATTEST: secretary (SEAL) ---------------· 1984. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD By Miyor CHERRY BILLS RANCHO WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT Arapahoe County, Colorado By .! ••=r~.~.~I~a~.~n~t~------------------------ -2 - • I • • - ., • • • • . ........ , ....... -. EXHIBIT "A" STANLEY L. HANNAH AND BETTY M. HANNIIH PAIIC:;:t. liO ~ 21:!) fY\A'RT;N J..-'.Nc X parca'l ;1 biUl locat.a d 'in the wi or s-t o! ·If,.~ of Sac t.ion 2, To'"l• •hip S 1out.h, Iiane• 68 ,. .. t., Arapahoe Co .nt.y, Colorado, baing aora part.ioul.arlJ daecribad a• fo1low•, t.o-v1tt c:o-nc1:11 at. a point. in t.hol cant.ar of !)")' Creek, tro'" w~ich I)Ol.."lt. t.111 DDrt.h,.lt corner of •1 d \ll ot sw; of IIWt bean N. 2e 0 2.)' SO" v., a dbt.anc• ot 950.6 l11t.1 fbanca s. 1&1° 50' &., alone t.la-canter lino of tr)' Craak, a dilt.anca ot 152.7 fa&t.J fbaace s. Tl0 15' &., a~ t.ha oant.er 11m of tr)' Cnak, a tll.n&noa of ~~tllfMt. \a a poiat. aD \Ill aa1t. l1no ot eaid vl at svl ot Dfl !linea aout.b, aloq t.ba au\ liD& at aaid \4 at S"oli of wwt. • dllt.&Doa ot 11&2 .o fMt. \a a poillt. an u.a IICII't.h line af l'.art.in I.AD&J ft.oca •. ·na 0 1 v., alMlll \ba DOr\l\ 11m at Marlin Lana, a dia- \uaa ot 2S6.9S faat.J TbaDM •~ lD' 16• 1., a dUt.aooa ot 1)7 .67 faat. ..rtt or lea t.o \Ill point. at llal1noin1J .. id abo~da•cribatl pvoal ot land oonUin• 0.96 acre •r• or 1&••· • I • • • - • • 0 ~\ I CITY Of ENGLfWOOD, COLO SANITATION D ICTS liTTl ETOW v I I• -]· ~~-;ii'.- 15 t-----~---------------~~------~~~~~-=~---{~=---~--~ l. ___ ~~~ -~-~~~~..._L ..... _ • • • - • • • • • C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I a N DATE September 26, 1984 AGENDA ITEM ~b SUBJECT Cherry Hills Rancho Supplement #4 INITIATED BY Englewood Water and Sewer Board ACTION PROPOSED ____ ~A~p~p~ro~v~a~l~of~C~h~er~r~y~Hl~·l~l~s~R~a~n~c~h~o ____________________ __ Supplement #4 BACKGROUND A request was made by the Cherry Hills Rancho Water and Sanitation District representing the owner/developer for annexation to the Cherry Hills Rancho Water and Sanitation District area. Inclusion of this land does not increase the tap allocation to Cherry Hills Rancho Water and Sanitation District. a. The subject land parcel is approximately 1.48 acres in size and is presently zoned R-1 with the proposed zoning to remain the same. b. Legal: See "Exhibit A" attached to Supplement #4. c. Owner: Edgar Edwards Warren and Gladys Wirz FINANCIAL DETAILS None. RECOMMENDATION At the September 15, 1984 meeting the Water and Sewer Board recommended that the City Council approve the annexation of the property described in Supplement #4 to the Cherry Hills Rancho Water and Sanitation District. • I • ...... • f l • • .. SUPPLEMENT NO . ~TO CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, acting by and through its duly author- ized Mayor and City Clerk, hereinafter referred to as "City,• and CHERRY HILLS RANCHO WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT, Arapahoe County, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "District, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on the 4th day of October, 1971, the City entered into a Connector's Agreement with the District concerning the connection of the District's water distribution and sewer collection facilities to the City's water supply and sewage systems; and WHEREAS, said Agreement provides that additional service areas can be included within the limits of the District with the written consent of the City; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the autual covenants of the parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. The City does hereby consent to the inclusion of the following described additional area into CHERRY HILLS RANCHO WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT and agrees that said additional area aay be served with the water distribution and sewage system facilities of the District, and that the City will supply water from the City's facilities for said additional area and treat the sewage discharged into the District's sanitary sever system and into the City's trunk line from said additional area, all in accordance with the Connector's Agree .. nt between the City and the District as nov constituted. Accordingly, the Exhibit "A" referred to in paragraph 1 of said Connector's Agreement is hereby aaended to include the following additional real proparty, situate in Arapahoe County, Colorado, to wit: Petitioners' Name: Petitioners' Address : Edgar Edwards warren and Gladys Wirz See Exhibit "A" attached bereto and aade a part hereof by reference • • I • • - f ! • • • • 2. Except for the agreements set forth in paragraph 1 hereinabove, each and every other provision of said Connector's Agreement remains unchanged and continues in full force and effect, and the additional area hereinabove included shall be subject to all the teras and agreements contained in said Connector's Agree .. nt. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused their names and seals to be hereunto subscribed and affixed this ___ day of ATTEST: City clerk (SEAL) ATTEST: secretary (SEAL) ---------------· 1984. CITY OP ENGLEWOOD By liiyor CHERRY BILLS aARCHO WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT Arapahoe County, Colorado By President -2 - • :, I • • • • • • EXHIBIT "A" EDGAR WARR~N AND GLAD¥5 WIRZ P.UC~ II) -1 •3 ny:.,i:r,t<J J.Ail/r 1 ....... ;do lalld locat.ed 111 t.tw wt of Swt ot IIWl of Section 2 .~onab1p S S.ut.ll, lfance 6! wat., Arapahoe CoWit.y, Coloredo, be• Sac •re parUCl&l.-q ducribed u tollova to-wU1 c-.aciAc at. a point. 1111 t.lle aout.twut.el'l:r ript.-ot-vay 1W ot U. C1 t.,. lllt.ch troa llbich 1111int. t.ha nort.hvast. corner ot ea1d wt et swt at IWi bean •· 11&0 laS• lO" w., a d1at.anc:e . ot 7112.1.2 taetJ !IInce 1. 58° O'lalonc t.tw e.f~t.twall.erly r1Cht.-ot-way line ot U. Clt.:r DU.cll, a dut.ance et 171..0 teat. t.o e point. 1n t.tw eent.ar at Dry CrHir and 2S.O t .. t. aolltheut.arly tro:a t.tw cent.er ltna at C1t.J' DUell Dipb:>n -•111·ed at. 1'1Cht. ~1 .. t.lleret.o1 f!l.-s. UO 10• v., alone t.lle -w 1w at Dr7 er.-, a d1e-t.uce ot u6.6 r .. ,, T~ s. 0?" lao• 1., alolli; t.lla -wr ltna ot Dr7 Creek, • d1e- Uao:e at lla3.8 t•t.J "' theMa s:· 10° loS• v., a ~•t.ance ot 237 .• 67 r .. t. to a point. on t.lle -t.ll line at llu'UD W..J Tlllance s. 8!1° )71 v., a~ the _.,h un. ot ll&l't.lll Lane, a d1a- t.DIIca et llal.Bl t•t.J ~ llel't.ll, e dlet.anae at m.i teet., "--••t., • c11at.ance at I&S.o teet., n-. IIOI't.h, a d1at.anc:e ot 167 .)2 teat _.e or le11 to t.ha point. et llac1..,1nc. S.id allewe •acr1bed parcel or 1-.-.d contain• 1.1&8 acru, ..,,.,. or lau~ I • • - • I • • • • 0 trn CW ENGLEWt eOLO . S&MTATION DISTRICTS ~--1. CMt:IOIIY IIlLI SAil. anoc. !1 --IlLLI !IAN 000 1 I. 04!'''" MilLS lltA'K:Mt" & -'"'T NUl VllLAOf: .. --~100[ •• -~ ..... 1110()11( a CM['"'1'YAL[ L 4. et«lltl'l lfiLLI MI: ... TI 1D. COl.utllllfN[ YALL[V a:~=:~]!=====:~!L:~~ .. ~~~,==-~~=-~r---r--=---==--~-~-~==~SJJ~ ~":::.0( M SM[MOA.If Mtl.LS Ill. lOUTH AIIA ... MO( Ill. lOUTH 011\.(WOOO 1?. IOUT"'AT( ... LLU • SouTHGfiT£ SwP. tot • • • • • 0 C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE September 26, 1984 AGENDA ITEM f.t;G SUBJECT Southgate Sannitation District Supplement #101 INITIATED BY Englewood Water and Sewer Board ACTION PROPOSED ______ A~p~p_ro_v_a_l_o_f __ S_ou_t_h~g_a_te __ s_an_i_t_a_t_io_n __ D_is_t_r_i_ct ______________ _ Supplement #101 BACKGROUND A request was made by the Southgate Sanitation District representing the owner/developer for annexation to the Southgate Sanitation District area. Inclusion of this land does not increase the tap allocation to the Southgate Sanitation District. a. The subject land parcel is approximately 10.106 acres. The existing zoning is Town Center District with the proposed zoning use to be for a shopping village. b. Legal: See "Exhibit A" attached to Supplement #101. c. Owners: Beau Monde, Ltd., 4414 Vine Street, Denver, Colorado 80216 FINANCIAL DETAILS None . RECOMMENDATION At the September 15, 1984 meeting the Water and Sewer Board recommended that the City Council approve the annexation of the property described in Supplement #101 to the Southgate Sanitation District . • I . ( • • • .. • SUPPLEMENT NO. ~ TO CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CIT¥ OF ENGLEWOOD, acting by and through its duly autho- rized Mayor and City Clerk, hereinafter referred to as "City•, and SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "District•, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on the 20th day of June, A.D. 1961, the City entered into a Connector's Agreement with the District concerning the connection of the District sewer collection facilities to the City's sewage system, which Connector's Agreement was modified and amended by agreement dated the 4th day of April, 1966; and WHEREAS, said agreement and modification thereof provided that additional service areas could be included within the limits of the District with the written consent of the City; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants of the parties hereto, it is agreed as follows: 1. The City does hereby consent to the inclusion of the additional area, situate in the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado described as follows, to-wit: Property Olomer: Beau Honda, Ltd. A Colorado Limited Partnership Property Description: See Exhibit "A" attached. into Southgate Sanitation District, and agrees that said additional area may be served with the sewer facilities of the District, and that the City will treat the sewage dis- charged into the City's trunk line from said additional area, all in accordance with the Connector's Agreement dated June 20, 1961, and the modification thereof dated the 4th day of April, 1966, between the City and the District. • I • ( • • • • Accordingly, Exhibit A referred to in paragraph 1 of the Modification to the Connector's Agreement dated the 4th day of April, 1966, is hereby amended to include the additional area as set forth hereinabove. 2. Each and every other provision of the Modification to the Connector's Agreement dated the 4th day of April, 1966, &hall remain unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOr, the parties have caused their names and aeala to be hereunto aubscribed and affixed this day of ---------------------• 1984. ATTEST: CITY CLERX ( S B A L) ATTEST: By __ ~SEC~RE~T~A~R~yr------------ ( S E A L ) -2 - MAYOR SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT ARAPAHOE AND DOUGLAS COUNTIES, COLORADO ay __ WpR£~s~rno"£N~rr------------------- • ... I . - ( • • • • ... .. •· _u ......... ~ ... ~ • '• ... ·• , •• ..--~ • BEAU MONDE, LTD. INCLUSION INTO THE SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT, A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST '-· AND THE SOUTHEAST '-• SECTION 16, TSS, R67W, 6TH Pl1 AND THE NORTHWEST ,., AND NORTHEAST '-• SECTION 21 , T5S, R6711, 6TH PH, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE , STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARILY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMHENCIIIG AT THE S,_ CORNER, SAID SECTIOII 16, THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE Of SOUTH ULSTER STREET AS PLATTED BY A SUBDIVISION OF SAID SECTION 21, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1 , AT PAGE 12, OF THE ARAPAHOE COUNTY RECORDS, A DISTANCE OF 62.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT·OF·WAY LINE OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO . 25 : THENCE II 22°00 '23"E, ALONG SAID WESTERLY R.O.W., 99 .54 FEET ; THENC6 N 00°06'10"E ALOtiG SAID WESTERLY R.O.W ., A DISTANCE OF 324.77 FEET; THENCE N 16 08'50"11, ALONG SAID WESTERLY R.O .W., A DISTA~CE OF 214.42 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTH ULSTER STREET AS PLATTED IN A SUBDIVISION OF SAID SECTION 16, AND AS R6CDRDEO IN PLAT BOOK 2, AT PAGE 10 OF THE ARAPAHOE COU~TY RECORDS; THENCE S DO 06'10"W, ALONG SAID WESTERLY R.O,W. OF SOUTH ULSTER STRHT, A OISTAIICE OF 531.20 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE SAID WESTERLY R.O.II. LINE OF SOUTH ULSTER STREET AND THE NORTHERLY R.O.W. LINg OF ORCHARD ROAD AS RECORDED IN SAID SUBDIVISIO :r OF SAID SECTION 16; THENCE S B9 31 '47"W, ALOJIG SAID NORTHERLY R.O .W., A DISTANCE OF 511.07 FEET; THENCE S 80°40'40"E, A DISTANCE OF 540.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BE GI NNING CONTAINING 1.193 ACRES, MORE OR LESS . DHIBIT "A" • 0 I . - - • f l j I • • • • 0 tltlf OF ENGLtV COLO . SANITATION OIST "'v TS l--1. Ct«llll't HILLI SAil A!!OC:. !. ~Hil L S-100 I I. -~~~~y HII.U RUCHI' I. CHf'""' HILLS Vli..LAW: T. CI«MtT "100( I. CHtRRT 100001[ e. CMf:'"'TVIL[ 1). CIOLUII8tN£ VALL EY L 4. CHt'""' MUS -n -·---II. COUIITU HOIO[S ~UJ====::,1kf=~Ti[~TT~"-==1 ~ ::.=: ~ ... \ 10, !Hti!IOAN HILLS tl. lOUT H a•aNMO[ II. MIUTM [NOL[WOOO IT. SOUTMIAT( II. YALLlY LITTL£TOII • 15 Soun-lc;;qrc. 'S'w P . /(;( DATE • • • C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I a N September 26 ,198~ AGENDA ITEM &ct SUBJECT Southgate Sanitation District Suppleme nt #102 INITIATED BY _________ En~g~l_e_w_o_od __ W~a_t_er __ a_n_d_S_e_w~e_r_B_o_a_r_d ______________________ _ ACTION PROPOSED ______ A~p~p_r_o_va_l __ o_f __ So_u_t_h~g_a~te~S~a~n_it_a_t_i~o~n_D_i~s~t~rl~·c~t ______________ _ • Supplement #102 BACKGROUND A request was made by the Southgate Sanitation District representing the owner/developer for annexation to the So uthgate Sanitati on District area. Inclusion of this land does not increase the tap allocation to the Southgate Sanitation District . a. The subject land parcel is approximately 1 acre in size and i s presently zoned R-1 with the proposed zonin g to remain the same. This is for construction of a new residence, requiring one tap. b. Legal: Lot 5, Block 5, Harbo ld Acres, Arapahoe County, Colorado c . Owners: Jacqueline W. Davis and Louis J. Davis FINANCIAL DETAILS None. RECOMMENDATION At the September 15, 1984 meeting the Water and Sewer Board recommended that the City Council approve the annexation of the property described in Supplement #102 to the Southgate Sanitation District. • I • • ( • • • • SUPPLEMENT NO. ~TO CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, acting by and through ita duly autho- rized Mayor and City Clerk, hereinafter referred to aa "City•, and SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "District•, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on the 20th day of June, A.D. 1961, the City entered into a Connector's Agreement with the District concerning the connection of the District sewer collection facilities to the City's sewage system, which Connector's Agreement was modified and amended by agreement dated the 4th day of April, 1966: and WHEREAS, said agreement and modification thereof provided that additional service areas could be included within the limits of the District with the written consent of the City: NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants of the -parties hereto, it is agreed aa follows: 1. The City does hereby consent to the inclusion of the additional area, situate in the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado described as follows, to-wit: Property Owner: Property Description: Louis J. Davia and Jacqueline W. Davia Lot 5, Block 5, Harbold Acres, Arapahoe County, Colorado into Southgata Sanitation District, and agrees that said additional area may be served with the sever facilities of the District, and that the City will treat the aewage dis- charged into the City's trunk line froa said additional area, all in accordance with the Connector's Agreement dated June 20, 1961, and the .edification thereof dated the 4th day of April, 1966, between the City and the District. • I • • - • • • • Accordingly , Exhib i t A referred to in paragraph l of the Mod i f i cati on to the Connector's Agreement dated the 4th day of April, l 966, is hereby amended to include the additional area as set forth hereinabove. 2. Each and every other provision of the Modification to the Connector's Agreement dated the 4th day of April, l966, shall remain unchanged. IN liiTNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their nu.s and seals to be hereunto subscribed and affixed this day of --------------------· 1984. ATTEST: CITY CLERX ( SEAL I ATTE ST: By_~~~~r-----------SECRETARY ( S E A L I -2 - MAYOR SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT ARAPAHOE AHD DOUGLAS COUNTIES , COLORADO By_~~~~~---------------PRESID bi1' • ,, I • • • • • 0 I:IT'f Of' ENGLEW COLO SAMTATION OIST , _ fS SauTH6=f/T£. S"u P. /0/ liTTL[TOOI 18 • • 11!1 • • • • • - C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE Se ptember 19 1984 AGENDA ITEM £De.- SUBJ ECT Sta te Highwa y Department Work Program for Fiscal Yea r 1985/1986 INITI ATED BY City Planning and Zo ning Commission ACTION PR OPOSED Approve proj ec ts for the F.Y. 1985/1986 Highway Work Program and refer them to the Arapaho e County Commissioners. INTRODUCT IO N: You will recall that each year at this tim e, the Cou nty Commissioners in each of the Colorado co unties are invited to identify those highway-related maintenance and/or con- struc tion projects with i n the county which they feel should be included in the Highway Department work program during the following fiscal year. Thes e r e quests are submitted to the State Highwa y Commissioners at a series of public meetings following which the Highway Comm issioners, together with the Highway Department staff , determine the pro- jects to be undertaken. In o rder to prepare a comprehensive proposal, the County Commission ers ask each of the munici palities within their jurisdict ion to submit work program projects which can be included in the Cou nt y request. The Co unty Engineer prepares the request for improve- ments in the unincorporated section s of the County . The Englewood request is prepared by the Planning Division staff with the assistance of the Di rector of Public Works and the Engineering Department. The cities of Che rry Hills, Greenwood Village and Sheridan were also contacted to see if there were any problems in common on which we could coordinate. The report is submitted to the City Planning and Zoning Commission, and is then referred to the City Council with any additions or dele- tions which the Commission members feel are necessary. The City Council gives final ap- proval t o the request, and forwards th City's requests to the Arapahoe County Commis- sioners. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission considered the Highway Work Program requests for fiscal year 1985/1986 , at its meeting on September 18, 1984. Several of the projects are not new-- th y hav been included in previous Englewood requests, but have not been funded. These ar th improvements to South Broadway, th interchange at Dartmouth and Santa Fe, the sheeting on U.S . 285 in the vicinity of South Pearl Street and the U.S. 285/Ithaca Avenue couplet. The City also r quested a study of Belleview Avenue last year, and th Commiss ion recommends that we again point out the need for improvements along this route. Th Planning Commission members recomm nd th t th Broadw y/B lleview inter- sectio n improvements and a compr h nsive study of th tr ffic mov m nt on Belleview Av nue b the City's top priority request. • I • • ( ( • • • • The request to upgrade the U.S. 285/South University Boulevard intersec tion t o pro- vide double left-turns and free-flow right turn lanes was suggested last year and is repeated in this request. Again, th e University/U.S. 285 request is added in co- operation with Cherry Hills Village. If Englewood is to continue to accommodate the heavy volume of local and through traffic safely and efficiently, these improvements must be undertaken. It is recommended that the City Council forward these requests to the attention of Mrs. Betty Ann Dittemore, Chairman of the Arapahoe County Commissioners, for inc lusion in the County F.Y. 1985/1986 Highway Work Program proposal. SUGGESTED ACTION: MOVED BY SECOND YES NO ABSENT • I • ( • STAFF REPORT Pa e -1- STAFF REPORT RE: • • • STATE HIGHWAY WORK PROGRAM Case 1/34-84 Requests for the State Highway Department's 1985-1986 Work Pro- gram. DATE TO BE CONSIDERED: September 18, 1984 BACKGROUND: Once again, it is that time of year when the municipalities and counties throughout the State submit requests to the State Highway Com- mission for projects which they want to have included in the State Highway Department work program for the following fiscal year. These are projects for which there may be state or federal monies available for implementation. The Englewood request is to be submitted to the Arapahoe County Commissioners by October 5th to be incorporated in the County report to the Highway Commission. The State Highway Commission will then hold hearings in Denver on November 16th to consider the requests from the several counties in this region. It will be at this hearing that the county and city representatives will have an opportunity to explain their particular needs to the Highway Commissioners. Fol lowing the hearings, the Commissioners will determine which projects will be funded. The projects which are included in the County report are those on the Interstate System, the Primary System, the Secondary System, and the Urban System. The requests for the Federal Aid Urban System must also be submitted to the Denver Regional Council of Governments for review by the Urban Systems Committee at the beginning of the calendar year. The staff has prepared a list of projects for the Planning Com- mission 's consideration , whi ch projects have been coordinated with the Director of Public Works and the Director of Engineering Services. The staff has also contacted Cherry Hills Village, Greenwood Village, and Sheridan to determine whether or not there are projects of mutual in- terest or concern which we can submit. As last year, Cherry Hills is submitting the South University Boulevard/U.S. 285 intersection, and Sheridan's primary concern is the improvements to South Santa Fe Drive. The Greenwood City Engineer indicated they do not have any request which we could jointly support. You will see that the requests are not new, they ar projects whi ch hav been submitted befor and not yet funded • • I • • - • STAFF REPORT Page -2- • • • STATE HIGHWAY WORK PROGRAM Case 1134-84 The staff would propose that one request from last year not be repeated. Th a t is the construction project on South Broadway between Yale and Floyd Avenues on the Federal Aid Urban System. The project, you will recall, was to widen it and to add a planted median. It would appear it will not be funded and if there is sufficient interest in the improvements in the future, it can be submitted directly to the DRCOG Urban Systems Committee. In the 1984-85 Work Program, the City had requested the Highway Department to undertake a study of Belleview Avenue between South Clarkson Street and South Windermere Street, especially in relation to major development anticipated west of South Broadway. It was pointed out that left-turning movements off of Belleview is hazardous at this time, and this will be compounded as additional development occurs. The Highway Department has striped a continuous left-turn lane from Broadway west to the median at the Windermere approach. This is, at best, an attempt at an interim solution to the problem along this stretch of Belleview. The staff recommends that we again request that a more detailed study be made and design standards established so at such time as development does occur, the cities of Englewood and Littleton can tell the developer what improvements to Belleview will be required, rather than having the developers propose the measures they feel will handle the access to and from their development. As new projects, the staff would suggest that we request a 2" over- lay on South Broadway from Quincy Avenue to U.S. 285 and that we modify the Belleview/Broadway intersection to provide a double left-turning movement in each of the four patterns. After the Commission's review, a recommended list of projects will be forwarded to the City Council for its consideration at the October 1st meeting. The projects approved by the Council will then be referred to the County Commissioners. The following requests are proposed for inclusion in the 1985-86 Work Program: A. Construction Projects on the State Highway System: 1. South Santa Fe Drive: a. The construction of an interchange at the intersection of West Dartmouth Avenue snd South Santa Fe Drive.* *At this time, the plans for the improvements at this intersection do not provide a grade separation. The staff is of the opinion that a grad separation is necessary and recommends that the interchange continu to be requested . • I • - • c • STAFF REPORT Pa e -3- 2. u. s. 285: • • • STATE HIGHWAY WORK PROGRAM Case 1134-84 a. The construction of a one-way couplet between South Broadway and South Santa Fe Drive utilizing the present alignment of U.S. 285 and West Ithaca Avenue, and the upgrading of the U.S. 285/South Broadway interchange as a part thereof. b. The extension of the drainage system along U. S. 285 to take care of the sheet flow across U.S. 285 between South Downing Street and South Pearl Street. c. Upgrade the South University Boulevard/U. S. 285 inter- section to permit double left-turns. Right-tum lanes should feed into through lanes. 3. Belleview Avenue a. Upgrade the South Broadway/Belleview Avenue intersection to provide double left-turning movements. b. Study prevailing and projected roadway and service con- ditions to develop standards for corrective measures to be required of persons constructing new developments which will have access to West Belleview Avenue. II. Requests Relative to the Federal Aid Urban System. A. Construction Projects on the Federal Aid Urban System. 1. South Broadway from Quincy Avenue to U.S. 285 to be overlayed, and from Quincy to Belleview to be provided with a landscaped median. Please review these projects and be prepared to suggest additions, modifications, or deletions at the meeting on September 18th. If the Commission can act on the matter that night, it can be referred to the City Council for consideration on October 1st, and forwarded to the Arapahoe County Commissioners by the October 5th deadline . • 0 I • • • • • Ltal l· <•I C..c·1 ~H A 0 ( ()e p arlmt n l ol H ,~hway~ Date September 18 1984 1 t8 1')SPOriR hOn Ptenrung D •v•s•o n ' lJ 0 H Forn 1 No ~07 PROJECT REQUEST Rev Seplernber . 1981 FIVE YEAR HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF COLORADO To Be Completed By Originator NOTE TO ORIGINATOR . Projects located within des ignated urban•zed ereas (50.000 or greater populat•on ) must be in the Tran!tponet •on Improvement Prog ram (TIP) adopled by lhe Me1ropo1111n Plannmg Organrzahon (MPO) before Budgetmg and C o nstruct•on can beg•n , . Request in g Agency . City of Englewood 2 . Name and Title of Representative : Eugene L. Otis, Mayor 3 Proposea Project is : a) State Highway 1/85 M 11e Mile Number SH Post to Post b .) Federal A id Mile Mile Urban Number Post to Post c .) Mile M ile Local Road No . Post to Post d .) New Road? (Yes or No) 4 . Is addition to the S .H . or F.A .U . System being requested? (S .H ., F.A .U .) 5 . Describe the specific location of the project. Intersection of West Dartmouth Avenue ,, and South Santa Fe Drive 6 . Is the proposed project in the currently adopted Five Year Program? XX (Yes , No) 7 . II No. 6 is "yes," indicate the type and extent , it any, of the change be i ng requested Construction of an interchange at the above mentioned location. I • II 8 . II No . 6 is "No" a .) Nature of the project being requested b .) What problem will the project solve? l ~ 9 . Is the project included in any local or regional plan? Yes XX No 10. If No. 9 is "Yes ." specify the date and title of the plan . 1979 Com2rehensive Plan I • • 11 . How would you numerically rank this project In Importance relative to all projects being aubmitted in L your area (Include those projects In the currently adopted Five Year Program)? Priority No. -- For Department Use Only Engmeenng Begm M P. Route No D 1strict No Projecl Length Item No • • • • • ~.,,,,t-o t ( o t ~.:r "Oc• Oepa n"w nt o l H tgh ..... a y!:. Date Septemb er 18 , 1 9 84 1 I Bn spOr!Rt tOn P !Ann tng O•v•S •On 0 0 H For m N o ~0 7 PROJECT REQUEST R•• SeptPmber . 1981 FIVE YEAR HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF COLORADO To Be Completed By Ori ginator NOTE TO ORIGINATOR Pro1e cts locolod wrthrn des l gnoted urbon rzed oreas (50,000 o r g reeter populotron) m u st be i n l he 1 r a nsport at ton Improvement Prog r am {TIPJ adopted b y the Me tr opolitan Plannmg Organ tzat ton (MPO) bet ore B udget tn g a no Const ruct•on can beg •n 1 . Reque sting Agency : ____ C:::.i::.t::.y,__,o::..:f'--'E"'"n"'g""l..,e..,w,o,:.:o,:.:d"--------------------- 2 . Name and T itle of Rep resentat i ve : Eugen e L . Oti s , May o r 3 Proposed Proje c t is : a ) State H ig hw ay Mile Mil e Number u. s . 285 Post to Post b .) Federal A i d M 1le M il e Urban Number Po st to Post c .) M i le Mi le Local Road No . Post to Post d .) New Road ? (Yes or No ) 4 Is add iti on to the S.H . or F.A .U . System being requested? No (S .H .. F .A .U .) 5 . Describe the specifi c location of the project. U . S. Highway 2R5 (Hampden Avenue) and West Ithaca Avenue between Sou th Bro adway and U . S. Highway 85 (South Santa Fe Drive • 6 . Is the proposed proj ect in the currently adopted Fiv e Year Program? (Yes , 7 . If No.6 is "yes ," indicate the type and extent . If any , of the change be in g requested . 8 If No. 6 is "No" XX No) a) Nature of the project bei ng requested Construct ion of one-way parallel couplet U.s . Highway 285 one-way westbound; West Ithaca Avenue one-way eastbound between inter- c hang e at South Santa F e Drive and South Broadway. Upgrade Broadway interchange. b ) What problem w i ll the prOJeCt solve? ----------------------- 9 . Is the project Included in any local or reg ional p l an ? 10 If No. 91s "Yes ," apecify the date and title of the plan Yes XX No ---- 1979 Comprehensive Plan 11 . How would you numerically rank th i s project In Importance relative to al l project• being aubmltted In your 1ru (Include those projects In the currently adopted F1ve Ye1r Program)? Priority N o . For Department Uae Only Eng one ermg D 1~t rtC I N o Beg i n M .P PrOJe Ct Length Route No Item No • • I • • • • - ~tttlt · (II C.o •t r a n ~· Oet l&rtmu nl of H•Qh~A'B '(~ Date September 18, 1984 1 tB I"t sportft lton Plltrtn 1n g 01v 151 0n D 0 H f orm N o ~(li PROJECT REQUEST Rev SeptembE-r . 19R1 FIVE YEAR HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF COLORADO To Be Completed By Originator N OTE TO ORIGINATOR Projects located w ithin des i gnated urbaniz ed ereas (50,000 or greater population) must bt in the Tran!lportahon Improvement Program (TIP) ed opted by the Metropol itan Plannmg Organ1ZII10n (MPO) befo re B udget •ng a nd Constructton ten beg rn 1. Request in g Agency . Citl of Englewood 2 . Name and T itle of Representa tive : Eugene L. Ogis, Mayor 3 . Proposed Project is : a) State H1ghway Mile M11e Number u. s . 285 Post to Post b .) Federal Aid Mile Mile Urban Number Post to Post c) M il e M il e Local Road No. Post to Post d) New Road ? (Yes or N o) 4 . Is add iti on to the S.H . or F.A .U . System be i ng requested? (S .H ., F.A .U .) 5 . Describe the spec ific location of the project . u. s. Highwal 285 between South Downing Street and South Pearl St r eet. 6 . Is the proposed p roject in the currently adopted Five Year Program? XX (Yes , N o) 7 . If No.6 is "yes ," i nd icate the type and extent , if any , of the change being requested . 8 If No. 6 is "No" a .) Nature of the project be ing requested . Extension of drainage s~stem alQng U , s I 285 with necess~r~ !nl~t~ t2 ~QII~~t h~~v~ ~h~~tin~ 2f 5t2Im IUD2ff AtiQS5 tbl: Hi~thwav b ) What problem w i ll the project solve? Heav~ sheeting of storm runoff !li;IQU thl: Highw~I {!,!,S, jl85l, 9 Is the project included In any local or regional plan? Yes let No II 10 If No 9 11 "Yes ." apecify the date and title of the plan . l!W.! Camg~:~hec&ille Elan :' I • • [1 11 . How would you numencally rank this project In Importance relative to a ll projects bemg aubmltted In your area (Include those projects In the currently adopted Five Year Program)? Pnonty No. -- For Deparlment Use Only Engmeenng Begm M P. Route No I• D1~1nc1 N o Project Length Item No • • • • • - S t&lt-o l C olo ra u ()epa r tmt n l 01 H •gh ways Date Septembe r 18, ] 984 1 18n sC'OriA1 tO'l Plimn tn g OtlltS •o n U 0 H form N o 50 7 PROJECT REQUEST Rev Septembe r, 1981 FIVE YEAR HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF COLORADO To Be Completed By Onginator NOTE TO OR I GINATOR PrOJe cts locat ed wtthin desi gnated urbani zed areas (50,000 or g reater popu lat•on ) must be en the 1 r an sportat ton lmprCivement P1ogram (TIP) eo opted b y the Me t ropolitan Planni ng Organ izat eon (MPO) before Budget rn g and Construct•on can beg•n . , . Request ing Agency . Cit~ of En~lewood 2 . Name and Title of Represen tative . Eugene L. Otis, Ma~or 3 . Proposed Project is . a l State H ighway M tle M tle Number SH 177 /US 285 Post to Post b .) Federal A id M il e M ile Urban Number Post to Post c .) M tle M tle Local Road No . Post to Po st d .) New Road ? (Yes or No ) 4 . Is add ttion to the S .H . or F.A .U . System betng requested? (S .H ., F.A.U .) 5 . Descr ibe the spec if ic locat ion of the p roject. The intersection of South Universitz: Boulevard (SH 177) and U.S. 285. 6 . Is the proposed project in the currently adopted Five Year Program? XX (Yes , No) 7 . If No. 6 is "yes ," indicate the type and extent , if any , of the change being requested . 8 . If No . 6 is "No" a .) Nature of the project be ing requested . The turn lanes need to be upgraded to permit d ouble left turns and the right-turn lanes should feed into a through lane. b .) What problem w ill the project solve? The volume of peak a.m. and p.m. traffic can n ot be accommodated sa fe ly and efficiently at this intersection. 9 . Is the project included in any local or regional plan? Yes No XX 10. If No. 9 is "Yes ," specify the date and title of the plan . It I • • 11 . How would you numerically rank th i s project In Importance relettve to all projects be i ng aubmltted In your area (Include those projects In the currently adopted Five Year Program)? Pr ionty No --- For Department Use Only Eng i neertng Begtn M P. Route No. OtSirttt N o Project Length Item No • • • • • SUitt> of C oh•r a o c· Oepanmtnt of H 1gh w 1 y~ Date . Septemher 18, 1984 1 l e nsr-or!At+On Pla nn+ng O PI IS +Or• 0 0 H Form N o ~07 PROJECT REQUEST RE:: ... September , 1881 FIVE YEAR HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF COLORADO To Be Com p leted By Or ig inator N O TE TO ORIGINATOR . Projecls l ocated w ithon des l gnlled urbenired ereos (50.000 o r greeter population) must be In th• Tra ns por1 at +o n Improvement Progr a m (TIP) ed opted by the Metropolitan Plannrng Orga ntz et•on (MPO ) befo re B udget •n g e nd ConsHuct•on ca n beg +n Request ing Agency : City of Englewood 2 . Name and Tttle of Represe nt at iv e : Eugene L. Otis , Mayor 3 P ro posed Project is : a) State Highway Mil e Mtl e Number 1/88 Post to Post b) Federal Aid Mile Mtle Urba n Nu mbe r Pos t to Post c .) Mile Mtl e Local Roa d No . Post to Post d .) New Road ? (Yes or No) 4 . Is add ition to the S .H . or F.A.U . System being requested? --~LC....------------- (S .H .. F.A.U.) 5 . Describe the specific locat ion of the project. Belleview Avenue from South Windermere Street east through the South Clarkson Street intersection. 6 . Is the proposed project in the currently adopted Five Year Program? XX (Yes. No) 7 . II No .6 is "yes," In d icate the type a nd extent , if any , of the change being requested 8 . If No . 6 Is "No" 9 . 10. a .) Nature of the project being requested . The prevailing and projected roadway and service conditions should be the subject of a comprehensive study and corrective measures taken in the 1985/86 Work Program, or a design developed to which persons (continued b .) What problem w ill the project solve? There is an extremely hazardous conflict between the heavy volume of through traffic on Belleview and left-turning movement at street intersections and at entrances to rivate develo ment. This will be com ounded Is the project Included In any local or regional plan? Yes----No _ _.xxtlo/l.. __ continued) If No . 9 Is "Yes," specify the date and title of the plan. ----------------- 11 . How would you numerically rank th i1 project in Importa nce relative to a ll project• being aubmltted In your erea (Include those projects In the currently ad opted Five Yaar Program)? Pnonty No For Depanment Uie Only • Engmeermg D1stnct No Begtn M P . Project Leng1h • Route No Item No I • • ( • • • • Ba. (continued) constructing projects having access to Belleview would be required to implement. Bb. with the traffic generated by proposed development. Right-turn only restrictions are not observed and are, therefore, impractical, and the opposing left-turn lanes which have been provided, offer only an interim solution to the problem. The study would provide standards for implementation by developers as new projects are sub- mitted to both Littleton and Englewood. • I . • • • !.r a t( cd L< •<·r an=" Df'PBllnlt'flt Ol H t ~f ""'"') ~ Date September 18, 1984 1 l anspori Bt•on P le nn •ng D •v •StOn u o f' r o<rr No ~07 PROJECT REQUEST Rev Septe m be r, 198l FIVE YEAR HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF COLORADO To Be Completed By Originator NOTE TO ORIGINATOR ProJects located withi n desl gneted urban•zed ereas (~.000 o r greater populat•on ) must be in the lra n•~orl ot o on Improvement Program (TIP) odopted by th e Met ropototon Plonnmg Orgon ozot oon (MPO ) belore Budg eton g ond Construct •on can begm . 1 . Requesting Agency : Cit~ of En!.\lewood 2 . Name and T i tle ot Representat ive . Eu!.\ene L. Otis 1 Ma~or 3 . Proposed Project is : a ) State H i ghway M 11e M tle N umber Post to Pos t b) Federa l A id M il e M il e Urban Number Post to Post c .) M il e M i le Local Road No. Post to Post d .) New Road ? (Yes or No) 4 . Is add ition to the S .H . or F.A .U System be i ng requested? No (S .H ., F.A .U) 5. Describe the specif ic location of the project . South Broadwa~ from u. s. 285 to Quine~ ~ Avenue, and from Quincy Avenue south to Belleview Avenue. 6 . Is the proposed project in the currently adopted Five Year Program? XX (Yes , No) 1 . II No. 6 is "yes," indicate the type and extent , if any , of the change being requested . 8 . II No. 6 IS "No" a ) Nature ot the project being requested . Overlay South Broadway between U .S. 285 and ,, Quincy Avenue, and provide left-turn l!ockets and a landsca2ed median between II Quincy and Belleview. b ) W hat problem w ill the project solve? 9 Is the project included in any local or regi onal plan? Yes XX No 10. If No. 9 is "Yes ," speci fy the date and title of the plan . 1979 Co!!!£rehensive Plan. I • ,, How would you numerically rank th i s proj ect tn importance relative to ell projects being aubmitttd in l you r area (Include those proj ects in the currently edopted Five Year Progrem)? Priority No. -- For Depa rt ment Use Only Engmeenng Begtn M P Route No D1stnct No Project Length Item No • • • • • ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 6 NORTH IIi I C~SR\I(T IOH PI OJlCTS O"f TM E STATE HlCHWA'I SYSTOt I 1. S.nta r e ttrtv• •. li p r •d• t o tnunh•nae 2 . U, I 711 •. On•-wa y covpht t.. Ct-rnrtton of I ut nOt> • t. l'r&red• htener t.ton. l. hllnS w Av t'nue, • •. t•urad tnt er u ct ton . "· l tu~y •nd 4•v .. Jor •••t a n f Gr t•rrovuf'nt• ne 1n1ar) t • a ce ·•r l t• , .. t t ct••t •4 t •ovt h . ~· Ou incy lblcll ff Stonford 4SOC) s. Tutts Un io Lay tOll • I • • • • - ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO Worren Bail ie Il iff ~oley 3oker Vosso r Co li•;• 6 NORTH • I COl>STRUCTlOl> FIIOJtCTS O:> T\1[ f[D[I\A\. I!UA' SY n:u 1, South lroadwa y a . ln•t •ll plantrd .. dian fr o Quine) t o l<ll•vlr• • f r~ u.s. 28 ~ t r Quin cy. b. Overlay fro• U.S. 28~ t r Quincy Av e nu<, • .. 8 .. .. I . • • • • C 0 U N C I L DATE September 26, 1984 • • • C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM U.F SUBJECT Amendment to The Broadway Planned Development INITIATED BY The City Planning and Zoning Commission ACTION PROPOSED Receive and rev iew the recommendation of the City Planning and Zoning Commission relative to the proposed amendment to The Broadway Development Plan and to annrove the amended Plan which is dated Au2Ust 30 1984 and attached hereto. BACKGROUND: On April 16, 1984, the City Council approved The Broadway Planned Development by Cou ncil Resolution No. 16, Series of 1984, following a public hearing on April 9th. The Planning Commission had held a public hearing on February 22, and had recommended that th e City Council approve the Planned Development with certain conditions. Council will recall that The Broadway will be located on the former Pasternak property, which lies east of Target and Burt Chevrolet, and south of the Englewood water tower. Greenwood Village and unincorporated land is to the east of the site, and Littleton is to the south . The approved Plan would have permitted 290 residential units in 24 two a nd three story buildings. This would include 130 townhouse units and 160 dwelling un its in multi- family buildings. At the Planning Commission hearing on February 22, there wa~ considerable concern ex- pressed by the adjacent Greenwood Village residents to the east, that the structures would adversely affect their view of the mountains as well as generate a number of persons who would live in close proximity to their property rather than the open area they have previously enjoyed. As a result of the testimony at the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant, Kal Zeff of CDM , had the Plan revised to reduce the impact on the residents to the east and it was the revised Plan which was approved by the City Council. On July 26, 1984, CDM submitted an application to amend the approved Planned Development in order to accommodate the changing market. In amending the Development Plan, CDM eliminated all of the structures on the east side of the site in the area which was of concern to the Greenwood Village residents. They also redu ced the number of buildings from 24 to 13 while increasing the number of condominium units from 290 to 312. Be- cause there would be more one-bedroom condominiums than originally proposed, less parking would be required and more o pen space would be provided. The density of the revised development would be 15.35 units per acre; 40 units per acre is the permitted density in the R-3 Zone District. Landscaping would be provided on 50 percent of the total site. The original density was 14.27 units per acre, and 46 per- cent of the site would have been landscaped. Under the requirements of the Landscaping I • • f • • • • Ordinance, only 25 percent of the site would have to be landscaped. Two persons from Greenwood Village testified at the hearing before the Planning Commis- sion on September 5. Dr. Roy Lininger, No. 5 Sunset Lane, said the Greenwood Village residents have no objection to the new Plan, but asked that the traffic be monitored as to any impact on South Clarkson Street. Mrs. Irene DuBois, No. 6 Sunset Lane, testified that she did not object to the revised Plan but wanted clarification of the height of buildings in relation to her property. She was told that the elevation of the site will be changed and the closest building will be 190 feet from her property and the roof line will be 30 feet below the first floor of her home. No other persons from that area addressed the Planning Commission . RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission has been very much impressed with the effort on the part of Mr. Zeff and the CDM representatives to meet with the residents of Greenwood Village to discuss the impact of-The Broadway development on their properties and the steps CDM has taken on its own initiative to mitigate any adverse effect. It was apparent at the public hearing that the objections expressed at the earlier hearing have been over- come by the applicant. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council approve the amend- ment to the Planned Development. The conditions to this approval are of the type customarily imposed on a Planned Development. They are as follows: 1. The drive lanes shall be designated as "fire lanes" as determined by the Fire Marshal. 2. The proposed design of the water system for fire protection purposes must be sub- mitted on blueprints and approved prior to permit issuance for building construction 3. The water system for this property must be designed to supply e nough water to meet the required fire flow calculations (ISO) for the largest, most severely exposed structure in the development and must provide an adequate number of on-site fire hydrants, as determined by the Fire Chief. (§10-30l(c), 1982 Uniform Fire Code.) 4. All fire hydrants and access roads must be usable immediately prior to and during any construction involving combustible materials. (§10-30l(d) 19R2 Uniform Fire Code 5. All streets are to be built t o City standards. 6. The South Broadway/Big Dry Creek bridge should be widened with adequate accelera- tion and deceleration lanes and a center storage lane for southbound traffic exiting from site. 7. The street providing access to the site should be named as per metro grid system. 8. Egress from the site may be limited to right-'tnrn only if the number of accidents increase at this intersection. 9. The 100-foot drainage easement should be expanded, where necessary, to include the entire Big Dry Creek channel to the top of the bank. 10. A maintenance access right across the private drives and parking lots as well as two ramps from the top of the bank to the channel bottom should be provided to the Ur- ban Drainage District. 11. The 100-year flood plain limit should be shown on the Development Plan. Th flood plain exc eds th channel limits at the south end of the property and should b so documented • I • • • , • • • • 12. Initial maintenance responsibility for the channel must be established. 13. Urban Drainage and Flood Control must approve design plans for any flood control facilities to be constructed if the facilities are to be eligible for the District maintenance assistance • SUGGESTED ACTION: MOVED BY SECOND YES ~0 ABSENT • I • • • ' • • • • CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF CASE NO. 31-84, ) FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING TO ) THE APPLICATION OF MR. KAL ZEFF ) FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO ) A DEVELOPMENT PLAN AS PROVIDED ) IN H6.4-15, PLANNED DEVELOPHENT ) DISTRICT, OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ) ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY ) OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. ) A Public Hearing was held on September 5, 1984, in connection with Case No. 31-84 in the City Council Chambers in the Englewood City Hall. The following members were present: Mr. Barbre, Mr. Tanguma, Mr. Carson, Mr. Magnuson, Mr. Allen, Mr. Stoel, Mrs. Becker and Hr. Venard. Hr. McBrayer was absent . Upon review of the evidence taken in the form of testimony, presentations, reports, and filed documents, the City Planning and Zoning Commission makes the following Findings of Fact: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That notice of the Public Hearing held on September 5, 1984 was given in the Englewood Sentinel, the official City newspaper, on August 15, 1984. 2. That the property was posted for not less than 15 days prior to the Public Hearing. 3. That the application is concerned with the eastern portion of an area east of the 5200 block of South Broadway and south of East Centennial Avenue, also formerly known as the "Pasternak Property", and identified as P.P.I. Number 2077 15 1 00 022, 020, and 005 in the"records of the Arapahoe County Assessor. 4. That the property has been zoned for High Density Resi- dence use since 1964, and that the High Density Residence District per- mits a density of 40 dwelling units per acre. 5. That the area with which the application is concerned is owned by Hr. Kal Zeff, 950 South Cherry Street, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado, 80231, and to be developed by CDH Construction Co., Inc., 950 South Cherry Street, Suite 1110, Denver, Colorado 80231. 6. That the Broadway Planned Development application submitted by Mr. Kal Zeff was approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council • I • • f • • • • -2- 7. That the application for an amendment to the approved De- velopment Plan for the above described property was filed with the Depart- ment of Community Development on July 26, 1984. 8. That the objective of Mr. Kal Zeff in filing an application to amend the approved Planned Development, is to construct 312 condominium units because of a change in the housing market. 9. That the density of the proposed amended Planned Develop- ment is 15.35 units per acre, with 61% of the total lot area, including the Big Dry Creek easement, as open space, and SO% of the total lot area landscaped. This is an .08 unit per acre increase in density over the approved Broadway Planned Development. 10. That all buildings will be set back from the east property line at least 190 feet. 11. That upon review of the proposed amendments to the approved Development Plan by various City departments, adjacent municipalities and other public agencies, no new concerns were raised. 12. That Mr. Dale Boyd, representative of CDM and Mr. Kal Zeff, and Mr. Bill Baer, architect for the project, explained the revisions. 13. That Dr. Roy Lininger and Mrs. Irene DuBois spoke and stated that they had no objections to the revised site plan, but their original concerns about the traffic generated by the development had not changed. CONCLUSIONS The City Planning and Zoning Commission concludes: 1. That proper notice of the Public Hearing ttas given. 2. That no persons other than the representatives of the applicant spoke in favor of the proposed development. 3. That two persons spoke but had no opposition to the pro- posed amendment to the development plan. 5. That evidence relative to the proposed Planned Development was entered into the record of the Public Hearing which demonstrates com- pliance with applicable zoning regulations . RECOMMENDATIONS Therefore it is the recommendation of the City Planning and Zoning Commission to the City Council that the proposed amendments to the Planned Development be approved with the following conditions: 1. The drive lanes shall be designated as "fire lanes" as determined by the Fire Marshal. 2. The proposed design of the water system for fire protection purposes must be submitted on blueprints and approved prior to perait is- susnc for building construction • I • • , • • • • -3- 3. The water system for this property must be designed to supply enough water to meet the required fire flow calculations (ISO) for the largest, most severely exposed structure in the development and must provide an adequate number of on-site fire hydrants, as deter- mined by the Fire Chief. (Section 10-301 (c), 1982 Uniform Fire Code.) 4. All fire hydrants and access roads must be usable immediately prior to and during any construction involving combustible materials. (Section 10-301 (d), 1982 Uniform Fire Code.) 5. All streets are to be built to City standards. 6. The South Broadway/Big Dry Creek bridge should be widened with adequate acceleration and deceleration lanes and a center storage lane for southbound traffic exiting from site. 1. The street providing access to the site should be named as per metro grid system. B. Egress from the site may be limited to right-turn only if the number of accidents increase at this intersection. 9. The 100-foot drainage easement should be expanded, where necessary, to include the entire Big Dry Creek channel to the top of the bank. 10. A maintenance access right across the private drives and parking lots as well as two ramps from the top of the bank to the channel bottom should be provided to the Urban Drainage District. 11. The 100-year flood plain limit should be shown on the De- velopment Plan. The flood plain exceeds the channel limits at the south end of the property and should be so documented. 12. Initial maintenance responsibility for the channel must be established. 13. Urban Drainage and Flood Control must approve design plans for any flood control facilities to be constructed if the facilities are to be eligible for District maintenance assistance. Upon the vote on a motion made by Mr. Carson and seconded by Mr. Steel. Those voting in favor were: Mr. Barbre, Mrs. Becker, Mr. Carson, Mr. Magnuson, Mr. Venard, Mr. Steel, Mr. Allen and Mr. Tanguma. Mr. McBrayer was absent. By Order of the City Planning and Zoning Commission • Edwin E. McBrayer, Jr. Chairman I • • - • ( • STAFF REPORT Page -1- STAFF REPORT RE: • • • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Case 1131-84 Request for approval of an amendment to the eastern portion of the approved Broad~ay Planned Development. DATE TO BE CONSIDERED: September 5, 1984. APPLICANT AND OWNER: Kal Zeff 950 South Cherry Street, Suite 1100 Denver, Colorado 80231 ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5200 Block of South Broad~ay (Former Pasternak Property) ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED: The Planning Commission is to consider a proposed revision to the site plan for the approved Broadway Planned Development. The revision ~ould apply only to the eastern portion of the site. All design considerations, such as building location, landscaping, off-street parking, and open space, should be analyzed . ACTION TO BE TAKEN: The Planning Commission must consider the proposed amendment to the Broad~ay Planned Development at a public hearing. Follo~ing the hearing, the Commission may approve or conditionally approve the amendment, or refer the plan back to the applicant for corrections. The revised plan ~ill be referred to the City Council for final action. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See attached plan. ZONE DISTRICT: R-3, High Density Residence. Multi-family d~ellings are permitted in this district, with a maximum density of 40 units per acre. ANNEXATION DATA: This area was annexed by Ordinance #13 of 1964. DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT SITF. AND SURROUNDING AREA: The subject site is an area of approximately 20 acres situated south of East Centennial Av nu sod east of South Broadway. The site was formerly known as the "Pasternak Property". Big Dry Creek traverses along the west side of the sit from Southeast to Northwest. The site is bordered by Greenwood Village and unincorporated Arapaho County on the east, and Littleton on the south. Burt Chevrolet and Tar et are on the north and west sides of the site. The site has I • • - ( • STAFF REPORT Page -2- • • - PL ANNED DEVELOPME~T Case 113 1-84 306 feet of frontage on South Broadway; however, only approximately 80' of fronta ge is available for access to the site. The developer has agreed to widen the Broadway bridge over Big Dry Creek in order to maximize the access. In En g lewood, the property bordering the site is zoned B-2, Business; in Arapahoe County the adjacent land is zoned R-3, Single-family; in Greenwood Village, the adjacent z oning is R-1.0, Single-famil y ; and in Littleton the adjacent land is zoned R-E, Residential-Estate District. BACKGROUND : The property was annexed by Ordinan ce Numb er 13 of 1964, and a zone classifi- cation of R-3-A, Multi-famil y Residence District, was placed on it following th e required public he a rin gs . The property has not developed unti l th is time, in par t , because the Fire Department h as traditionally required tw o access points. Since it is impossible to provide the s econd a ccess fr om wi thin En gl ewood, it was ne ces - sary to work with ad j a cent juri s dictions; and Greenwood Village, Litt leton , and Arapahoe County would n o t g rant the needed a ccess . The Fire Department is now taking the position that one access point is adequ ate , provided their other concerns are met. In February of this year the Planning Commission and , subseque nt ly, City Council approved the Broadway Planned De velopment . Since that time , and with changes in the housing market, CDM is now requesting t o amend the Plan. PROPOSED CHANGES IN THE DEVE LOPMENT PLAN: Mr. Zeff is proposing to change the approved Development Plan. The c hanges inc lude a density inc rease from 290 dwelling units to 312 dwelling units; however, there will be few e r buildings. Of the appr oved 24 buildings, 17 building s with the townhouse dwel ling type will be eliminated. Ins tead, a total of 13 buildings are proposed to be bu ilt with 24 condomin i ums per building. The new building loca- tions affect the east po r tion of the site. Because of the decrease in the number of buildings , the setback from the east property line nearest the single-family homes in Greenwood Village wil l be 190 feet. The o t her noted change is the increase in open space especially through the narrow middle portion of the site. COMMENTS FROM OTHER DEPARTMENTS, ADJACENT MUNICIPALITIES AND PUBLIC AGENCIES: Code Administration: No comments at this time. All items affecting construc- tion and fire safety will be dealt with during the permit application process. Chief Building Inspector: See attachment #1. This comment do ~s not affect the revised layout of the buildings. Public Works: Big Dry Creek easement does not appear to follow Big Dry Creek. Utilities: No comment, nothing is shown concernin utilities. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANALYSIS: Because of changes in th housing market, CDM is finding it ne cessary to revise the Broadwa y Developm nt. They are proposin to build 312 dwelling units in 13 structure with 24 dw lling units per buildin • • I • • - • ( • STAFF REPORT Page -3- • • • PLANNED DEVELOPMENT Case 1131-84 Detailed below is a review of this proposed development's compliance with the R-3, High Density Zoning Regulations. Required Minimum Lot Area 1 Net Acre Permitted Density 40 Units/net acre Lot Coverage 35% Minimum Usable Open Space 25% Minimum Landscaping 25% Maximum Building Height 5 stories Originally Approved P.O. 20.327 Acres 14.27 units/ acre 18 % 58 % 46 % with 200 street trees 2 stories plus garden level Proposed 20.327 Acres 15.35 units/ acre 14.47% 61.02 % SO % (over 200 street trees to be provided.) 2 stories plus garden level Minimum Setbacks (P.O. provides for flexibility in setbacks) Minimum Off-Street Parking 527 spaces 577 spaces 552 spaces This proposed multi-family development meets or exceeds all requirements of the R-3 Zoning Ordinance. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATION: It is the staff opinion that the proposed revised Broadway Planned Develop- ment is very similar to the approved Planned Development. It appears that develop- ment concerns were addressed during the first procedure. Since that time any new concerns have not been raised during the staff review of the new proposals. Therefore, the staff recommends approval of the revised Planned Development with the same conditions attached by the Planning Commission to the previous approved Planned Development. A copy of the conditions is marked Attachment #2 . A copy of the originally approved Planned Development site plan is inc luded for your comparison . • I • • • > < ;: a < a a:: CD J: I-:> 0 (/)· ·( -.. -- • ~ I e SUBJECT SITE -----"V'.--------·- 1" = 250' • • - 0 PROPOSED BROADWAY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT LITTLETON • • • • - 0 111£ UI.:!UAUWA Y • CIT.,-()f' t:Nt;Lt:W()()I) • .... ,.., ......... VAT .\: !.!.!'-":~-"'~~~': =~ .. :=~.::-:=~ ~-'!.:!.' .:.....--..J..':""'::!:-.!.1•• ----.... ~-=-~-":':'"-:: .. -:-...:--=---4:11.0...-•t• _ ... ....._._. ____ .,. __ ~-~ = -.::.=.\L ~ = =~ ....... :::-:::: =-.:: ~: t ::: ~-'::.\:-...::...:.-=--.--- ~-~u ':::::=..·:::r---..o::-- __________ , ~-::~ ::.::::--::: -~ ..... ... _,.. -----' -~---·· --::.·- IT VLAN .,..._ -'--· _:e ::::. -~-----· APPROVED PLAN 4/84 ::..~-=..: ::-_~ ....... -... --.. =-~ ...... ---·-· --·'*------:· ~---=-:.:--..... ----..__ _________ _ _., .. • . wa ~. •..-~..;.w:.o.· _.,... ____ . ~ .. ==--=--= . "· .. · ... ! t ( • • • • otii'AinMrNT or eOMMUNIT.Y AITACWENT # l DtVtLOf 'MENl ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Dorothy Romans, Assistant Director of Community Development Gene Macrande~ef Building Inspector DATE: August 17, 1984 SUBJECT: The Broadway Condominiums -Proposed Amendment to Planned Development Pursuant to your request for comments concerning the above proposed project, the Division of Building and Safety will require substantial completion of specific construction features in order to protect the safety and welfare of occupants of the dwelling units. Conditions required to be met prior to the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for individual dwelling units are as follows: 1. Completion and final approval of all electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems for the entire building housing such dwelling units. 2. Completion and approval of the entire building structure and each dwelling unit therein including roofs and exterior finish, stairways, fireplaces, drywall and trim, paint, floor coverings (excluding carpeting), and smoke detectors, building identification and unit identification. 3. Completion and approval of perimeter site grading and drainage for the building containing such dwelling units. 4. Completion and approval of paved access drive from the project entrance at Broadway to serve the building housing such dwelling units, and sufficient paved parking spaces for the occupants of such dwelling units. 5. Approval of adequate fire hydrant placement and access to the building by the Fire Department. A final Certificate of Occupancy will be granted for each building permit issued to the owner of the development upon completion and approval of all of the above items, and will include required approval of permanent paved access drives and parking, fire lane designations, traffic control, erosion protection, and landscaping. • I • • ( f • • - ATIAGrofT fl 2 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS: Given the history and difficulties associated with developing thi5 site, the Department of Community Development recommends that the Broadway Planned Development be approved with the following conditions: 1. Some are~>s of the drive lanes may need to be designated as "fire lanes" as determined by the Fire Marshal. 2. The proposed design of the water system for fire protection pur- poses must be submitted on blueprints and approved prior to permit issuance for building construction. 3. The water system for this property must be designed to supply enough water to meet the required fire flow calculations (ISO) for the largest, most severely exposed structure in the development and must provide an adequate number of on-site fire hydrants, as determined by the Fire Chief. (Section 10-30l(c), 1982 Uniform Fire Code.) 4. All fire hydrants and access roads must be usable immediately prior to and during any construction involving combustible materials. (Section 10-30l(d), 1982 Uniform Fire Code.) 5. All streets &I~ t o be bu~lt to City standards. 6. The South Broadway Big Dry Creek bridge should be widened with adequate acceleration and deceleration lanes and a center storage lane for southbound traffic exiting from site. 7. The street providing access to the site should be named as per metro area grid syatem. 8. Egress from the site may be limited to right-tum only if the number of accidents increase at this intersection. 9. The 100-foot drainage easement should be expanded, where necessary, to include the entire Big Dry Creek channel to the top of the bank. 10. A maintenance access right across the private drives and parking lots as well as two ramps from the top of the bank to the channel bottom should be provided to the Urban Drainage District. 11. The 100-year flood plain limit ahould be abovn on the Develop- ment Plan. The flood plain exceeda the channel limita at the south end of the property and abould be ao documented. 12. Initial aaintenance reaponaibility for the channel .uat be eatabliahed. 13. Urban Drainage and Flood Control auat approve deaign plana for any flood control facilitiaa to be conatructed if the facilitiea are to be eligible for Diatrict .. intenance aaaiatance • • I • - • • • - CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, OOLORADO 3400 SOUTH ELATI STREET ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80110 Application for approval of a Development Plan I22.4A Planned Developaent District ---------------- --- -- Date: J u l y 26 , 198 4 Do Not Write in This Space: Fee Paid: __ Case Nu.ber: ________ __ Applicant : Naae : Ka l Zeff 9 50 S . Che rry ST . Address : Denver , Co l orado 80 21 Date Received : __ ~------ Telephone : ____ 7~5 ~9 ~-~5 ~1 ~2~3 ____ ___ Pre-~pplication Conference : Owner of Property: Date of Hearilljl before Plannin& Naae: Ka l Ze f f Cooulission '-------------950 S. Che rry ST . Address : Den ver , Colorado 8022 Action Taken'-------------- Telephone :--~7~5~9~-~5~1~2~3~-----Date Received by City Council: Date of Hearia& before Council: Action Taken : Conditions Iaposed : ______ _ Date Filed with Arapahoe CountJ Clerk C. Recorder: ______ _ Subsequent Action: ________ _ 1!2!.!= Jf the applicant is not the owner of the property, the applica- ,-tion aust be accoapanied by the written authorization for aucb action si&ned by the owner or owners of said land , to1ether with a stateaent sicned by the qwner or owners that theJ a&ree to be bound by the reculations and conditions which will be effec tive with the approval and recordin& of the Developaent Plan. INFORMATION TO ACCOMPANY APPLI CATION : (a) Prelia i nary Plans, A Preliainary Plan showin& the aajor details of the pr~d Planned Developaent at a scale of not less than 1" • 50 'and in sufficient detail to evaluate the land plannin&, buildin& des~cn , and other features of the proposed developaent . Tbe Prtliainsry Plaaa aust contain , insofar •• is appli c able, the followiDI ainiaua inforastion : • ) I • • • • - 1. A Boundary survey; 2. The existing topographic character of the land ; 3. The proposed land uaes ; 4. The location of all existing and proposed buildings, structures and 1•prove•ents; 5. The density and type of dwellings, including typical elevations and showing maxiaum hei~ht; &. The aaJOr po•nts of access to public right~-of-waJ, the internal traff1c and circulat1~u &ybte~•, if applicable, ofi-st1 .c,e~ parkiUil area~, •cr·,.ice .:u ·~wb., and loading areas ; 7. The location, height and size of proposed signs, fences, lighting and advertising devices including typical elevations ; 8. Areas which are to be conveyed, dedicated or reserved for public purposes, including, but not liaited to, parks and recreational areas, schools, public buildings , or other public purposes; 9. Areas subject to a 100-year flooding cycle ; 10 . A general landscape plan with aajor types of aaterials designated as to purpose ; 11. Designation of various stages for construction, if applicable. (b) Written Statement. The written statement with the Planned Development application shall contain the following ainiaua inforaation: 1. A stateaent of the present ownership and a legal description of all of the land included in the Planned Development; 2. An explanation of the objectives to be achieved by the development, including building descriptions, sketches, or elevations as aay be necesaary to des- cribe the objectives ; 3. A development schedule indicating the approxiaate date when construction of the development or atages of the development can be expected to begin and to be c..,pleted ; 4. Copies of any apecial agreeaents, conveyances, restrictions , or covenants which will govern the use, aaintenance and protection of the development and public areaa. (c) The applicant aay aubait any other inforaation or exhibit& deeaed pertinent to the evaluation of the propoaed Planned Development. Subaitted herewith is tbe required fee of $ which baa been establiahed by the City Council according to a achedule for Planned Development applications to cover the cost of processing and review . Jn additi on, I undaratand that I will be required to post the property according to apec1fications set fortb by the Departaent of Coaaunity Develop- aent and to pay for the coat ot the publication of the legal notice ot the public hearing before the City PlanniQg and Zoning Coaaiaaion and before tbe CitJ Couacil, ahould the Council deteraine that it la to the public intereat to hold a hearing on tbia appli c ation. By : ot being Applicant (Corporation • or individual owner) I • • • - P R 0 C L A M A T I 0 N WHEREAS , the Englewo od Business and Pr ofessional Wo men 's Cl u strives to elevate th st anda rds f o r women in business and in their professions, as well as to promot th e interests of busine ss and professional women; and WHEREAS, the Club strives to bring about a spir it of coope r a - tion among busines s and profession a l wo me n of the United S tates and e xtends op por unities to business and professiona l wo men thro ugh ed uc ati on along th e lines of industrial , scientif i c and vocationa ac tivities ; and WHEREAS, wor king women of the United St ates co ~pr is 41 % of the e~ployed population of this country and contribute subst an - tially to a sound working structu re of our nation; and WHE REAS , it is the desire of t h is Council to honor Am e rica's working women who are devoting their time , talents, and energy to a ssist other women achieve the recognition and respect th ey deserve in the business world; NOW, THEREFORE , I , EUGENE L . OTIS , Mayor of t he City of Englewood , Colorado , hereby proclaim the week of October 21-27 , 1 984 as NATIONAL BUSINESSWOMEN 'S WEEK in the Ci ty of Englewood and urge all citizens to join in t he observation by giving their support to the Club, its members, and the working women of this community, not only durin g this week but through the entire year. GIVEN under my hand and seal the 1st day of Octobe r , 1984. Eugene L. Otis, Mayor • I • • • • P R 0 C L A M A T I 0 N WHEREAS , th e Englewood Business and Profession al Wome n 's Club str ives to elevate the standards for women in business and 1n th el r pro f essio ns, as well as to promote th e interests of bus iness an d professional worn n ; and WHEREAS , the Club strives to bring about a sp irit of coopera - tion among business and professional women of the United State s and ext nds oppo r unit1es to busin ss and prof essiona l wo rn n throu~h ~duca 1on along the lines of 1ndustrial , scientific and voc ational activities ; and WHEREAS, working women of the United States comprise 41 % of th e employed pop lation of this count r y and con tr ib ute subst an- tlally to a sound working structure of our n ation ; and WHEREAS , it is the desire of this Council to honor Am rica 's working wom en who are devoting th eir tim e , talen t s , and en ergy to assist other women achieve the rec ogn ition and respe ct t hey d eserve in t he bu&ines s wo rld ; NOW , THEREFORE , I , EUGENE L . OT IS , Mayor of t he City o f Englewo od , Colorado , hereby proclaim the week of October 2 1 -27, 1984 as NATIONAL BUSI NESSWOMEN'S WEEK i n th e C ity of En gle wood and urge al l citizens to join in the obs e r vation by g i v i ng their support to the Club , its members , and the working women of this community , no t o nly during t his week but through the entire year. GIVEN under my hand and seal the lst day of Octob r , 1984. c.~ r:e L. Olis , Mayor • I • f • ORDINAOCE 00. SERIES CF 198."74 __ _ • • • BY AUTHORI TY CXXJOCIL BILL 00. 43 INTRODUCED BY OXJOCIL MEMBER VOBEJDA AN ORDINAOCE VACATI~ A Sl'ORM ~ AND WATER LINE EASEMENI' AND GRAm'!~ AN EASEMnfl' FOR A NE)ol WATER LINE IN 'lliE CINDERELLA CITY PARK!~ LOT. WHEREAS, the Englewood water and Sewer Board recarmended to City Council on P'Brch 19, 1984 that a sewer and water line easanent be vacated and that an easanent be obtained for a water line ; ~. 'ruEREFORE, BE IT ORL\l\INID BY 'IHE CITY OXJOCIL CF THE CITY CF ~DKXlD, COLORAOO, as follows: Section l. '!he hereinafter described property located in the C1ty of Englewood, Arapahoe Comty, Colorado, be and the same is hereby declared vacated pursuant to the provisions of Part 3, Article 2, Title 43, Colorado Revised Statutes, and title thereof shall vest in Cindetmak Associates, a j oint venture, sai d vacated land being more particularly described as follows: Line C -8" Dic.neter water Main Beginning at the point ident ified i n the easement recorded in Book 1807 at page 699 of Arapahoe Comty Records des- cribed for water main line "A", as the point of beginning of Lines "B" and "C''; thence Westerly an angle to the left of 90 degrees 00'00" a distance of 195.1 feet to a point; thence SOuthwesterly an angle to the left of 45 degrees 00 '00" parallel to and 10.0 feet Northwesterly of Colunn Line "l't1'' a distance of 411.4 feet to a point; thence Northwesterly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet Northeasterly of ColiJIUl Li ne "16" a d i stance of 392.0 feet to a point; thence Northeasterly an angle t o the right o f 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 fee t SOu theasterly o f Co l unn Li ne "ZZ" a d i s tance of 820.0 f eet t o a point ; thence Easte r ly an ang l e t o the right of 45 degrees 00 '00" a distance of 503 .0 feet to a po i n t on line "A" referred to as point of ending lines "B" and "C''. Inclooing all fire hydrants and services leadii'XJ thereto . • ? 4 .{ I • • - , ( • • • • Storm Sewer No. l. Recorded in B:>ok 1807 at page 700 of the Arapahoe COunty Records. Beginning at the Northeast corner of the SE 1/4 of the SE l/4 of section 33, Township 4 South, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M.; thence Westerly along the North line of said SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of section 33 a distance of 240.3 feet to a p:>int which is the true p:>int of beginning; thence South- westerly an angle to the left of 68 degrees 50'00" a distance of 12.95 feet to a p:>int which is 6.0 feet North- easterly of COlunn Line "42" and 16 .0 feet Northwesterly of COlunn Line "CXX:"; thence Southeasterly an angle to the left of 36 degrees 50'00" a distance of 36.7 feet to a p:>int which is 12.0 feet Southwesterly of Colunn Line "42" and 16.0 feet Northwesterly of Colunn Line "BBB"; thence Southwesterly an angle to the right of 60 degrees 40'00" parallel to and 16.0 feet Northwesterly of Colunn Line "BBB" a distance of 594.0 feet to a p:>int 4.0 feet Northeasterly of COlunn Line "23"; thence Southerly an angle to the left of 45 degrees 00'00" a distance of 345.36 feet to a p:>int which is 4.15 feet Southeasterly of Colunn Line ''UU" and 16.0 feet Northeasterly of COlunn Line "15"; thence South- easterly an angle to the left of 45 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 16.0 feet Northeasterly of COlunn Line "15" a distance of 350.15 feet to a p:>int which is 2.3 feet Southeasterly of Colunn Line "JJ"; thence Southeasterly an angle to the right of 35 degrees OO'OO" a distance of 53.0 feet to a p:>int; thence Southerly an angle to the right of 10 degrees 00'00" a distance of 134.7 feet to a p:>int on the North right of way line of West lftnpjen Avenue. Section 2. The hereinabove described land is located entirely w1th1n the City of Ehglewood and does not constitute a boundary line between the City of Ehglewood and any other county or other municipality. Section 3. The vacation of the hereinabove described storm sewer and water line easement will not leave any adjoining land without an established public road connecting said land with another established public road. Section 4. That Cindermak Associates, a joint venture, shall proVlde the City of Ehglewood with an easement of the hereinafter described property located in the City of Englewood, Arapahoe, COunty, Colorado, wi th appropr i ate t i tle p:>licy for the same: 2 • I • • ( I ( ( • • • • Li ne C -8" Dianeter water Main Beginning at the point identified in the easement descript i on f or water main line "A", recorded in Book 1807 at page 699 of Arapahoe COunty Records, as the point of beginning of Lines "B" and "C''; thence Westerly an angle to the left of 90 degrees 00'00" a distance of 195.1 feet to a point; thence southwesterly an angle to the left of 45 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet North- westerly of C011Dl11 Line "r+t" a distance of 524.4 feet to a point; thence Northwesterly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 25.0 feet Northwesterly of COllllll1 Line "12" a distance of 396.0 feet to a point; thence Northeasterly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet SOuth- easterly of C011Dl11 Line "ZZ" a distance of 933.0 feet to a point; thence Easterly an angle to the right of 45 degrees 00'00" a distance of 503.0 feet to a po i nt on line "A" referred to as point of ending lines "B" and "C''. Including all fire hydrants and services leading thereto. 'rtle form of said easement shall be as foLnd on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. section 5. This vacation ord i nance shall became effective to vacate said property and the Mayor and ex officio City Clerk- Treasurer are authorized to execute a copy hereof and deliver to Cindecnak Associates, a joint venture. section 6. That the easement for the property described in section 4 hereof shall be recorded in the records of Arapahoe O>ooty COlorado. Introdoced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 17th day of September, 1984. Published as a Bill f or an Ord inance on the 19th day of September, 1984. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 1st day of October, 1984. Published by title as Ordinance No. _______ , Series of 1984, on the 3rd day of October, 1984. Attest: Eugene L. Otis , Mayor ex officio city Clerk-Treasurer 3 • I • • - I , • • • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. , series of 1984. --- Gary R. Higbee 4 I • • - • • • • GRANr OF WATER LINE EASEMWI' THIS GRANr of a water line easanent (this "Gra nt") is made this day ·of , 1984 by CINDERMAK ASSOCIATES, A JOINT VEN'IURE, ("Grantor") whose address is in favor of the CITY OF EH>LE)J()(){), COLORAOO, ("Grantee") whose address is 3400 South Elati street, Fnglewood, CO 80ll0; 'lhe parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. Easanent Proeerty. 'lhe "Easanent Property" shall mean the real property located 1n the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows, to wit: Line C -8" Dicm~eter water Main Beginning at the point identified in the easanent description for water main line "A", recorded in Book 1807 at page 699 of Arapahoe County Records, as the point of beginning of Lines "B" and "C''; thence Westerly an angle to the left of 90 degrees 00'00" a distance of 195.1 feet to a point; thence Southwesterly an angle to the left of 45 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet Northwesterly of Colunn Line "1+1'' a distance of 524.4 feet to a point ; thence North- westerly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 25.0 feet Northwesterly of Colunn Line "12" a distance of 396.0 feet to a point; thence Northeasterly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet Southeasterly of Colunn Line "ZZ" a distance of 933.0 feet to a point; thence Easterly an angle to the right of 45 degrees 00'00" a distance of 503.0 feet to a point on line "A" referred to as point of ending lines "B" and "C''. Including all fire hydrants and services leading thereto. 2. Consideration. As consideration for this Grant, Grantee has paid Grantor the sun of <ne Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by Grantor. 3. Grant of water Line Easanent. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee, its successors and ass1gns, a perpetual, nonexclusive easanent (the "water Line Easanent") over, under, across and through the Easanent Property for the purpose of constructing, operating, maintaining, repairing, replacing, removing and enlarging the "Lines and Appurtenances", as hereinafter defined. 'lhe "Lines and • I • • - • • • - Appurtenances" shall mean one or more water pipelines and all necessary underground and surface appurtenances thereto necessary or desirable for the transmission of water, incllrling, but not limited to, mains, candui ts, vaults, ventilators, electric or other control systmes, cables, wires and connections. 4. .!\ccess. Grantee shall have the perpetual, nonexclusive right of ingress and egress in, to, over, through and across the Easement Property for any purpose necessary or desirable for the full enjo~ent of the rights granted to Grantee l.l'lder this Grant. 5. Restoration. Grantee agrees that after the construction, maintenance, repa1r, replacsnent, or enlarganent of any of the Lines and Appurtenances, Grantee shall restore the surface of the Easanent Property as nearly as reasonably possible to the grade and oondition it was in imnediately prior to said construction, maintenance, repair , replacanent, or enlarganent, except as may be necessay to accamKldate the Lines and Appurtenances. Grantee agrees to restore and repair any improvanents of Grantor on the Easanent Property loohich are danaged, modified or altered by Grantee during said construction, maintenance, repair, replacsnent or enlarganent. 6. &lbjacent and Lateral &lppc;>rt. Grantor covenants and agrees that Grantee shall have the nght of subjacent and lateral support on the Easanent Property to loohatever extent is necessary or desirable for the full, canplete and undisturbed enjo~ent of the rights granted to Grantee under this Grant. 7. Rights of Grantor. Grantor reserves the full right to the undisturbed 01o11ership, use, and occupancy of the Easanent Property insofar as said 01o11ership, use, and occupancy is consistent with and does not impair the rights granted to Grantee in this Grant. 8. Abandonnent. In the event that Grantee shall abandon the rights granted to 1t under this Grant, all right, title and interest hereunder of Grantee shall cease and teiillinate, and Grantor shall hold Easement Property, as the scwne may then be, free fran the rights of Grantee so abandoned and shall own all materials and structures of Grantee so abandoned, provided that Grantee shall have a reasonable period of time after said abandonnent in loohich to ranove any or all Lines and Appurtenances fran the Easanent Property. In the event that Easanent is abandoned by Grantee, Grantor shall have the right, at its sole option, to require Grantee to ranove or neutralize any improvanents constructed in the Easanent by Grantee. 9. Warranty of Title. Grantor warrants and represents that Grantor is the fee simple owner of the Easement Property and that 2 • I • • • • • • Grantor has full right, title and authority, that this Grant is effective to grant and convey to Grantee the water Line Easement, and that this Grant of an easenent is superior to all other grants. Grantor further covenants and agrees to indannify, defend and hold Grantee hacnless from and against any adverse claUn to the title of the Easenent Property by all and every person or persons lawfully claLming or to claim the whole or any part thereof. 10. Binding Effect. '!his Grant shall extend to and be binding upon the heirs, personal representatives, SUCCessors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. 'Ihe teens, covenants, agreements and conditions in this Grant shall be construed as covenants running with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREXF, the parties hereto have executed this Grant of water Line Easenent the day and year first above written. Attest: Title: Attest: Title: GRANTOR: CINDERMAI< ASSOCIATES, a joint venture -' ~ The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the united States, a New York corporation ~--------------------- Title: ~ Dennak Associates, a Limited Partnership By Kravco, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation By ______________ __ Title • I • • - • • • • I ( STATE <F NE1>l YORK COONTY <F NE1>l YORK ss. ( 'lbe foregoing instrunent was acknowledged before me this ~~ .~~ ~ --------------------------~~ ~ of 'Ihe -;:~:=-'i t:-ab==l:-e--::L'""'i'f,...e--=-As-s_ur __ ance ____ _ Soc1ety of the Uruted States, a New York Corporation, as Joint Venturer of CindeD!Iak Associates, a joint venture. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Oammission expires: Sl'ATE <F ~YLVANIA ss. Notary PUblic Jl.ddress: 'nle foregoing instrunent was acknowledged before me this day o f , 1984 by------------- as and as of -;;Kr=av:::co:::::-,---;I;:nc:::-.-,-=a-;;:Pe:::nns==y:;l7v=an=-rl-=a-- corporatl0n ~ General Partner of Dermak Associates, a limited partnership as Joint Venturer of CindeD!Iak Associates, a joint venture. WITNESS my hand and off i cial seal. My Oamm iss i on e xpi res: Notary PUblic Jl.dd r ess: L-~~-·--------------------~~~--~·--~-------------~~Jn I • • - • • • ORDINMCE 00. d~ SERIFS CF 1984 • • • BY AUTHORITY ClXJtCIL BIU. 00. 44 IN'I'ROI:XJ:ED BY ClXJtC IL HamER BRAOOHAW AN CR:lltWCE APPROVI~«; AN AGU:EMmT BE'lWmJ 'DIE CITY CF JH>LE)l(XD, CXLORAOO, lH> 'DIE ARAPAHOE REX;IONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT lH> APPROVING AIDENXJol '1HERETO FOR ESTABLI!Hmn' CF THE APAL BOOK FtHl 'ro BE'M'ER LIBRARY SERVICES 'ro CITIZfN> CF a«;LEJKXX> lH> 'DfE axJNTY. BE IT ORDIHNED BY 'DIE CITY CXXJtCIL CF 'DIE CITY CF JH>LE)l(XD, CDLORADO, AS F'OLl.GiS: Section 1. 'lbat the agreanent between the City of &tglewod, O>lorado, am the Arapahoe Regional Library District, entitled "Agreement for Library Services," is hereby approved. A copy of said Agreement is attached hereto as Attacbnent 1 am incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. 'lbat the addend\11\ to the 11greement for Library Services for establ isnnent of the APAL Book Fllnd amon:J Arapahoe Regional Library District, Englewood Public Library, Edwin A. Bemis Library am Aurora Public Library is hereby approved. A copy of said llddend\lll is attached hereto as Attactrnent 2 and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. 'ftle Mayor am ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer are hereby authorized to sign am attest said Agreanent am Addend\11\ on behalf of the City O>mcil and the City of &tglewood. IntrodiX:ed, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 17th day of September, 1984. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 19th day of September, 1984. Read by title am passed on final reading on the lst day of october, 1984. Published by title as Ordinance No. ___ , Series of 1984, on the 3 rd day of October, 1984 • Fugene L. Otls, Mayor Attest: ex off1c1o City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, ():)lorado, hereby certify that the above am fore;Joing • ?a I • • • - • • - is a true, accurate and oanplete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance N:>. , Series of 1984. --- Gary R. Hlgbee • • ( I • • • • ( ( • • • • AGR([MEN1 FO R LIBRARY SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, ~~~ade and entered into this ___ day of -----' 1984, by end between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, 1 1111nicipal corporation, herein- after somethnes referred to IS 'City', end the ARAPAHOE REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT, hereinafter sometimes referred to as "District•. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Arapahoe Regional Library District, being a statutory regional library district organized and existing pursuant to Title 24, Article 9D, Colorado Revised Statutes, 197 3, as amended, for the purpose of providing 1 i bra ry service to the residents of the unincorporated areas of Arapahoe County and those IIIUnicipalities within said County not operating their own public libraries; and WHEREAS, the City of Englewood operates a public library within its corporate boundaries and desires to cooperate with the District in providing library service to District residents according to the tenns and conditions as hereinafter set forth below and in eccordance with applicable statutes of the State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, the parties have contracted previously for a cooperative approach to provision of said library services and desire to continue providing said services between the City and the District, NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the 1111tual pr011ises herein, it is agreed by and between the parties hereto as follows : 1. The District shall circulate to library cardholders of the City of Englewood any itetn available for circulation fr0111 the District's library facilities, and the City shell circullte to Arepahoe County residents who qualify for and possess a District library card any iteM available for circulltion fr011 the City 's library facilities. loth District and City shall .. intain circulation records for said transactions and shall subolit the sa• to each other on a quarterly basis. Upot1 receipt of said reports, the City shall debit the District for each ite~~ circullted by the City to District cardholders, and the District shall debit the City for each itelll circulated by the District to the City cardholders at the rate of Fifty-five cents ($0 .55) per transaction, and payw~ent for the net difference between seid transactions shell be .. de accordingly by the library wi th the lesser circulltion figures to the library with the greater circulation figures at this rate . ATTACHMENT 1 • I • • D ( • • • • 2 . The rate per tran ~a c tlon spe cH i ed In this Agreement and upon Its signature shall coincide 11lth the rate then currently In use by the Central Colorado Library Sys tet~~ in its recIprocal borr011l ng progr111 . 3 . The te..., of this Agree~Mnt shall be for the year c-ncing January 1, 1985 up to and Including Decelllber 31, 1985 . During said tenn, all qualified cardholders for both the Di strict and the Ci ty l i braries NY enjoy reciprocal borrowing at both the City and the District facilities respectively, and said cardholders shall be subject to all applicable rules and regulations associated there11ith. •· It 1s understood betveen the parties hereto that the District shall not receive any equity in book stock or in any of the City's library facilities by virtue of the terms of this Agreement; and the City shall not receive any equity in the book stock or in any of the District's library facilities by virtue of this Agree~nent . 5 . The District shall have access to City library records during normal business hours for the purpose of verifying all figures supplied to the D1str1ct by the City and the City shall hue access to District library records for the SliM' purpose . 6 . During the ter~~ of this Agreement, City 11ill establish and 111intain a boolallob1le stop on 1 once-a-veek basis to the following area : Allee Terry School. IN WITIIESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands and seals the day and year first above written . AmST : secretary ATTEST: Director of Finance, ex-officio C1 ty Clerk-Treasurer ARAPAHOE REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT By_~~~~r-7~~~~~----P"resident, BOard of Trustees CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 8y,~~~~~~~~-----Miyor, City of Eng 1 eiliDOd -2- • I . , • • • • AOOENDUM 'ro ArnEEMmr FOR LIBRARY SERVICES (ESTABLISHING 'mE APAL BOOK FUND) 'miS AOOENDUM to J\greanent for Library Services establishing the APAL Book E\lnd, entered into the day of -----1984, --- WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the parties have entered into an ~reanent for reciprocal circulation services; and WHEREAS, the parties seek to secure the 0\oKlership of certain books in common in order to provide books that they could not individually acquire; t-Ool, 'lliEREFORE, BE IT AGU:ED AM<::H; 'mE PARTIES AS E'()[.LGJS: 1. 'ltle four public libraries in Arapahoe Cotnty (Aurora Public Library, Englewood Public Library, Edwin A. Bemis Public Library, and Arapahoe Regional Library District) have agreed to cooperate in a project named APAL -Arapahoe Public Access to Libraries. 2. The mission of the directors of the four public libraries is to Unprove access to library materials to residents of Arapahoe County as eR'iorsed by the four library boards. 3. TO accomplish this mission, each library will deposit in 1985 the sum of TWenty-five Hundred Dollars ($2,500) in a restricted fund held and administered by the Arapahoe Regional Library District as follows: Arapahoe Public Library -invoice for $2, 500 wi 11 be sent by Arapahoe Regional Library District; on receipt, the money will be placed in the restricted APAL Book E\1nd. Englewood Public Library -$2,500 will be deducted from Arapahoe Regional Library District's first quarter reciprocal borrowing payment and placed in the restricted APAL Book E\1nd • Edwin A. Bemis Public Library -$2,500 will be deducted from Arapahoe Regional Library District's first quarter reciprocal borrowing pa}'ll1ent and placed in the restricted APAL Book E\1nd. Arapahoe Regional Library -$2,500 will be transferred from tnappropriated surplus funds and placed in the restricted APAL Book E\lnd. • I • - ( , • • • IN WITNESS WHEREX>F, the City of Englewood aOO the Arapahoe Regional Library District have set their hands a00 seals the day and year first above written. Attest: Secretary Attest: ex officio city Clerk- Treasurer ARAPAHOE R&;IONAL LIBRARY DISl'RICT ~----------------~~~~ President CITY CR DIGLEWOOO, COLORADO I • • - • ORDINAN:E 00. __ _ SERIES CF 1984 • • • BY AUTHORITY A -;o: II ~Oli" COUNCIL BILL NO. 43.1 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER VOBEJDA AN ORDINAOCE VACATIN:> A STORM SEWER AND W.TER LINE FASEMENT AND GRANTIN:> AN FASEMENT FOR A NEltJ WATER LINE IN 'ruE CINDERELLA CITY PARKIM; rm. WHERFAS, the Englewood Water and sewer Board rec<mnended to City Council on March 19, 1984 that a sewer and water line easement be vacated and that an easement be obtained for a water line; turi, 'rnEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY 'ruE CITY COUNCIL CF 'ruE CITY CF EtliL&IOOD, CDLORAOO, as follows: section 1. ~ hereinafter described property located in the Cl ty of Englewood, Arapahoe Comty, Colorado, be and the same is hereby declared vacated pursuant to the provisions of Part 3, Article 2, Title 43, Colorado Revised Statutes, and title thereof shall vest in Cindecnak Associates, a joint venture, said vacated land being more particularly described as follows: Line C -8" DiC~t~eter Water Main. Recorded in lk>Ok 1807 at page 699 of the Arapahoe Comty Records. ~inning at the point identified in the easement recorded in Book 1807 at page 698 of Arapahoe Comty Records des- cribed for water main line "A", as the point of beginning of Lines "B" and "C''; thence westerly an an:~le to the left of 90 degrees 00'00" a distance of 195.1 feet to a point; thence Southwesterly an angle to the left of 45 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet NOrthwesterly of Column Line "1'11" a distance of 411.4 feet to a point; thence NOrthwesterly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10 .0 feet NOrtheasterly of Column Line "16" a distance of 392.0 feet to a point; thence NOrtheasterly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet Southeasterly of Column Line "ZZ" a distance of 820.0 feet to a point; thence Easterly an an:~le to the right of 45 degrees 00'00" a distance of 503.0 feet to a point on line "A" referred to as point of ending lines "B" and "C''. Inclwing all fire hydrants and services leading thereto. • I . - ,.-.. • • • - Stoon Sewer No. l. Recorded in B:>ok 1807 at page 700 of the Arapahoe O:mnty Records. Beg inn"ing at the Northeast corner of the SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 33, TOwnship 4 South, Range 68 west of the 6th P.M.; thence Westerly along the North line of said SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 33 a distance of 240.3 feet to a point loilich is the true point of beginning; thence South- westerly an angle to the left of 68 degrees 50'00" a distance of 12.95 feet to a point loilich is 6.0 feet North- easterly of Cohron Line "42" and 16.0 feet Northwesterly of Colll1ln Line "<n:"; thence Southeasterly an angle to the left of 36 degrees 50'00" a distance of 36.7 feet to a point ..tlich is 12.0 feet 9:>uthwesterly of Colll1\ll Line "42" and 16.0 feet Northwesterly of Colll1ln Line "E13B"; thence Southwesterly an angle to the right of 60 degrees 40'00" parallel to and 16.0 feet Northwesterly of Colll1ln Line "BBB" a distance of 594.0 feet to a point 4.0 feet Northeasterly of Colll1lll Line "23"; thence 9:>utherly an angle to the left of 45 degrees 00'00" a distance of 345.36 feet to a point ..tlich is 4.15 feet Southeasterly of Colll1lll Line "UU" and 16.0 feet Northeasterly of Colll1lll Line "15"; thence South- easterly an angle to the left of 45 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 16.0 feet Northeasterly of Colll1ln Line "15" a distance of 350.15 feet to a point Which is 2.3 feet Southeasterly of Colll1ln Line "JJ"; thence Southeasterly an angle to the right of 35 degrees 00'00" a distance of 53.0 feet to a point; thence southerly an angle to the right of 10 degrees 00'00" a distance of 134.7 feet to a point on the North right of way line of West !Bnpjen Avenue. Section 2. 'lb! hereinabove described land is located entirely Wlthin the City of tngl~ and does not constitute a boundary line between the City of tnglewood and any other co~ty or other m~icipality. Section 3. 'lb! vacation of the hereinabove described storm sewer and water line eaSEI!IeOt will not leave any adjoining land without an established public road connecting said land with another established public road. Section 4. 'rtlat Cindermak Associates, a joint venture, shall provide the City of tngl~ with an eaSEI!IeOt of the hereinafter described property located in the City of tnglewood, Arapahoe, County, Colorado, with appropriate title policy for the same: 2 • I • - • • • • Line C -8" Diameter water !'Bin Beginning at the point identified in the easanent description for water main line "A", recorded in Book 1807 at page 698 of Arapahoe Cowty Records, as the point of beginning of Lines "B'' and "C''; thence Westerly an angle to the left of 90 degrees 00'00" a distance of 195.1 feet to a point; thence southwesterly an angle to the left of 45 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet North- westerly of Colunn Line "~' a distance of 524.4 feet to a point; thence Northeasterly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 25.0 feet Northwesterly of Oolunn Line "12" a distance of 396.0 feet to a point; thence Northeasterly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet SOuth- easterly of Colunn Line "ZZ" a distance of 933.0 feet to a point; thence Easterly an angle to the right of 45 degrees 00'00" a distance of 503.0 feet to a point on line "A" referred to as point of ending lines "B" and "C''. Including all fire hydrants and services leading thereto. 'ttle focn of said easement shall be as foi..Ild on EKhibi t "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 5. This vacation ordinance shall become effective to vacate said property and the I'Byor and ex officio City Clerk- Treasurer are authorized to execute a copy hereof and deliver to Cindecnak Associates, a joint venture. Section 6. That the easanent for the property described in Section 4 hereof shall be recorded in the records of Arapahoe Oo~r~ty Colorado. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 17th day of September, 1984. PUblished as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 19th day of september, 1984. llnended and passed as csnended on the lst day of ~tober, 1984. PUbl i shed i n fu ll as csnended on the 3rd day of ~tober, 1984. Attest: &:~gene L. ot1s, Mayor ex off1c1o C1ty Clerk-Treasurer 3 • I • • • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Fllglewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introouced, read in full and passej on first reading the 17th day of Septentler, 1984; amended and passed as cwnended on the lst day of October, 1984. Gary R. Higbee 4 I • • • • • • GRANT CF WATER LINE EASEMENT nus GRANT of a water line easanent (this "Grant") is made this day of , 1984 by CINDERHAK ASSOCIATES, A JOIN!' VENI'URE, ("Grantor") ..nose crljress is in favor of the CITY CF EN:iL~(X)[), CDLORAOO, (11Grantee'1) lotlose address is 34 0 0 South Elati street, Englewood, CD 80110; The parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. Easanent Prol,JE!rty. The "Easanent Property" shall mean the real property located 1n the County of Arapahoe, state of Colorado, more particularly described as follows, to wit: Line C -8" Diameter water Main Beginning at the point identified in the easanent description for water main line "A", recorded in Book 1807 at page 698 of Arapahoe County Records, as the point of beginning of Lines "B" and "C"; thence westerly an angle to the left of 90 degrees 00'00" a distance of 195.1 feet to a point; thence southwesterly an angle to the left of 45 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet Northwesterly of Colunn Line "1'1'1'' a distance of 524.4 feet to a point; thence North- westerly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 25.0 feet Northeasterly of Colunn Line "12" a distance of 396.0 feet to a point; thence Northeasterly an angle to the right of 90 degrees 00'00" parallel to and 10.0 feet SOutheasterly of Colunn Line "ZZ" a distance of 933.0 feet to a point; thence Easterly an angle to the right of 45 degrees 00'00" a distance of 503.0 feet to a point on line "A" referred to as point of ending lines "B" and "C''. Including all fire hydrants and services leading thereto. 2. Consideration. As consideration for this Grant, Grantee has paid Grantor the sun of ()le Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of lotlich is hereby acknowledged by Grantor. 3. Grant of water Line Easanent. Grantor hereby grants to Grantee, its successors and ass1gns, a perpetual, nonexclusive easanent (the "water Line Easanent") over, under, across and through the Easanent Property for the purpose of constructing, operating, maintaining, repairing, replacing, ranoving and enlarging the "Lines and Appurtenances", as hereinafter defined. The "Lines and • I • • • t • • • • Appurtenances" shall mean one or more water pipelines and all necessary underground and surface appurtenances thereto necessary or desirable for the transmission of water, inclt.rling, but not limited to, mains, conduits, vaults, ventilators, electric or other control systmes, cables, wires and connections. 4. llccess. Grantee shall have the perpetual, nonexclusive right of ingress and egress in, to, over, through and across the Easanent Property for any purpose necessary or desirable for the full enjoyment of the rights granted to Grantee mder this Grant. 5. Restoration. Grantee agrees that after the construction, maintenance, repau, replacenent, or enlarganent of any of the Lines and Appurtenances, Grantee shall restore the surface of the Easenent Property as nearly as reasonably possible to the grade and condition it was in imnediately prior to said construction, maintenance, repair, replacenent, or enlargement, except as may be necessay to accannodate the Lines and Appurtenances. Grantee agrees to restore and repair any improvements of Grantor on the Easanent Property ~ich are damaged, modified or altered by Grantee during said construction, maintenance, repair, replacenent or enlargement. 6. SUbjacent and Lateral Slppc;>rt. Grantor covenants and agrees that Grantee shall have the nght of subjacent and lateral support on the Easement Property to ~atever extent is necessary or desirable for the full, canplete and undisturbed enjo~t of the rights granted to Grantee mder this Grant. 7. Rights of Grantor. Grantor reserves the full right to the undisturbed 01o11ersh1p, use, and ~'lCY of the Easanent Property insofar as said ownership, use, and occupancy is consistent with and does not impair the rights granted to Grantee in this Grant. 8. Abandonnent. In the event that Grantee shall abandon the rights granted to 1t under this Grant, all right, title and interest hereunder of Grantee shall cease and tenninate, and Grantor shall hold Easanent Property, as the same may then be, free fran the rights of Grantee so abandoned and shall ~ all materials and structures of Grantee so abandoned, provided that Grantee shall have a reasonable period of time after said abandonnent in ~ich to remove any or all Lines and Appurtenances fran the Easanent Property. In the event that Easenent is abandoned by Grantee, Grantor shall have the right, at its sole opt ion , to require Grantee to remove or neutralize any imP£ovements constructed in the Easenent by Grantee. 9. warranty of Title. Grantor warrants and represents that Grantor is the fee simple o..ner of the Easenent Property and that 2 • I • • - ( • ( • • • • Grantor has full right, title and authority, that this Grant is effective to grant and convey to Grantee the water Line Easanent, and that this Grant of an easanent is superior to all other grants. Grantor further covenants and agrees to indannify, defend and hold Grantee har::mless fran and against any adverse claim to the title of the Easanent Property by all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof. 10. Binding Effect. 'ltlis Grant shall extern to and be binding l.p>ll the heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of the respective parties hereto. 'lbe ter::ms, covenants, agreements and conditions in this Grant shall be construed as covenants running with the land. IN WITNESS WHEREXF, the parties hereto have executed this Grant of water Line Easanent the day and }'ear first above written. Attest: Title: Attest: Title: GRANl'OR: CINDERMAK ASSCX:IATFS, a joint venture By 'lbe B:juitable Life Assurance Society of the U'lited States, a New York corporation 3 By ____________________ _ Title: By Demlak Associates, a Limited Partnership By Kravco, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation By ______________ __ Title • I • • • • • STATE <F NDJ YORK ss. 0XJNTY <F NDJ YORK 'I'le foregoing instr1J11E!flt was acknowledged before me this as day of , 1984 by --ana----------- ~as~----------------o~f~The ~Equ~~i~t~abrl~e~L~i~f~e~As--s_ur_anc __ e ____ _ Society of thE! tl'll ted States, a New York COrporation, as Joint Venturer of CindeDIIalt Associates, a joint venture. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: srATE <F PENNSYLVANIA ss. NOtary PUbi1c Address : 'I'le foregoing instr1J11E!flt was acknowledged before me this day of , 1984 by -------------- as and ~------~----~-----r--~---- as ----.-----------.------of Kravco, Inc., a Pennsyivan1a corporation as General Partner of oennalt Associates, a limited partnership as Joint Venturer of CindeDIIak Associates, a joint venture. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My Commission expires: NOtary Publ1c .lliddr ess : • I • • • - • • _j '----1 __ II'-----:-:-. .LS::-::::=-::IJ.Y1] .,-1 u L I I l • • I . • - • • • OROitWCE 00. SERIES OF 198'4-..--- • • • BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR CXXJOCIL BILL 00. 46 INTRODUCED BY ~IL MEMBER j2 tJ tY -. {,u...t_.) AN OROINArCE GRANTir«i TO 'lliE EN;LarooD KJUSir«i AU'lliORITY $250,000 FOR THE EN;LF>roQD HeME REHABILITATION PROGRAM AND AMENDir«i AN AGREEMmr B~ 'lliE CITY OF EN>L&IOOO AND THE Er«>L&IOOO HOOSir«i AU'lliORITY FOR AII'IINISTRATION OF 'lliE Ha1E REHABILITATION PROGRAM. WHEREAS, the City of El'lglewood has received a '1\olo Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollar ($250,000) grant fran Colorado State Deparanent of LOcal Affairs to operate a housing rehabilitation progratt; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend and clarify the agreanent between the Housing Authority and the City of El'lglewood concerning the Housing Rehabilitation Progratt; ~. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDIUNED BY 'lliE CITY CXXJOCIL OF 'lliE CITY OF Er«>L&IOOO, COLORADO: Section 1. 'ltlat the City of El'lglewood shall attend the agreanent under Ordinance No. 27, series of 1983, with the Housing Authority titled "An Agreanent Between '!be City Of El'lglewood And The Englewood Housing Authority Regarding 'ltle Policies Governing The Housing Rehabilitation Loan and Grant Progratt of the Englewood Housing Authority (4/83) ." Said attended agreanent is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 2. The City of Englewood hereby grants to the Englewood Hous1ng Authority the sun of '1\olo tt.mdred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000) to be used in accordance with Application Grant Number 84-440 under Title I of the Housing Development Act of 1974 and the Agreanent described in Section 1 hereof. Section 3. All ordinances and resolutions in conflict with the foregoing are hereby repealed. Section 4. 'ltle City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby authorizes the Mayor and the ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer to sign and attest said attended agreanent on behalf of the City of Englewood and City Council. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 1st day of October, 1984 • • I • - ( ( I • • • • • • •' • Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 3rd day of October, 1984. EUgene L. 0t1s, Mayor Attest: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, ())lorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and canplete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 1st day of October, 1984. Gary R. H1gtlee • I • • • • • r---------------------------------------------------------------------· I (\ C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE September 27. 1984 AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT PROPOSED BILL FOR ORDINANCE INITIATED BY Department of Co11111unity Development ACTION PROPOSED Approve a Bill for Ordinance granting the Englewood Housing Authority $250,000 for the Housing Rehabilitation Program. The City of Englewood was recently notified that the $250,000 Co11111unity Development Block Grant (CDBG) was approved for Housing Rehabilitation from the State Department of Local Affairs . The attached Bill for Ordinance authorizes this transfer of funds and assigns the responsibility for administration of the program to the Englewood Housing Authority. . A revised Agreement between the City and Englewood Housing Authority for the administration of the Housing Rehab i l i tation Program is also submitted for approval by the City Council. I • Changes were made to update and to c larify the agreement . The changes are as follows : 1. Section 1, II . The funding source was changed from the Department of Housin g and Urban Development to the St a t e De partme nt of Local Affairs . 2 . Se ction 4, III A. Here we a r e ad ding ''and asset " to r eflect that the r e is an asset limi t i n add i t i on to an i ncome limi t . 3. Section 4, III B. Changed "priority" neighborhoods to "e li gibl e " neighborhoods . 4. Section 4, IV A. Adding "as appropriate" to the end of the sentence. 5. Section 8, C. Replaced the word "qualified" with the word "licensed". Recommendation: It is reco11111ended that the City Council approve the revision of the Agreement between the Englewood Housing Authority and the City for the administrati on of the Housing Re hab ilitation Pr ogram and autho ri ze t he trans f er of f unds. I . • • DlPAITMlNT Of lOCAl AffAIRS OffiCE Or THllliiCUTIVI DI~LCTOII 131) Sh~rmon StrHt .llm . Sll Dt'n_.t-,. Colur•do 10203 PhonPI10 It 1166 ·27:'1 June 6 , 1984 The Honorable Eugene L. Otis 84-440 ftlayor City of Englewood 3400 South Elati Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Mayor Otis: • • • j .{ _1,0 '' .. {(I'{ STATE OF COLORf\bt) . t r · I'' 1 · T.X>.; -··--···-··--·--- RtC"h l rd 0 llmm C.0...f"fn o r Mw""n Sm tth [III P(U fiH " {)!t t'(1 ()f It is my pleasure to award C011111unfty Development Block Grant (CDBG) program funds fn the amount of(. $250,000 to the City of Englewood for owner-occupied housing rehabilitation fn Target Area Two. To contact Carolyn Hosford To assist you in successfully i~l~nting and adMinistering your grant project, we will conduct a~~ eR lu1y 17, 11 aftd 11 on the federal and State requiretnents and Jrc)cedures ~ .. pp1feab1e ~o CDBG funded projects. Specifics on the workshop will be sent to you in the near future. We appreciate your cooperation in our review of your application and your attendance at the CDBG Advisory Conmfttee ..eting. We are now looking forward to working with you fn undertaking and successfully completing your _project. Sincerely, ~~ 2!../f'l '-t-</j2-Executfv~ector cc: Frances Buck Jonas ~ • I • • • • • • AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND THE ENCI.EWOOD IIOUSJ NC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE POLICIES GOVERNING THE HOUSING REIIADILIT/\TlCJN LOAN AND GRANT PROGRAM OF TilE ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTI!ORl'J'Y (4/83). The City and the Authority agree as follows: I. The: Englewood Housing Authority, herc:in call"d tlw "llullaorily" through its personnel, or the personnel of the City of Englewood, herein called the "City", with the approval of the City Manager, shall be respon- aible for the execution of the Houaing Rehabilitation Loan and Grant Program, herein called the "Program", in accordance with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) regulations. The Authority shall turn over any unused CDBG funds to the City at the end of the agreement and administer the funds in accordance with the State Department of Local Affairs procedures •. 2. Application for assistance ahall be first submitted to and approved by the Authority under policies adopted by the Authority. 3. Upon receipt of an application, the Authority shall cause an in- apection to be made of the applicant's residence and, if deemed necessary, shall: a. Cauae a detailed list and explanation to be made of all actions and work required to eliminate or repair the conditions of the residence which make it sub- standard. b. Cause an estimate of the coat of such repairs to be made. c. Obtain sufficient documentation that the applicant had good title to aaid residence. d. Make an estimate of the value of the applicant's equity in aaid reaidence. e. Prepare and verify a aocial and economic profile of the applicant which shall include: Family composition, family income, place of employment, if any, of all family members, approximate date of purchase of resi- dence, and existing indebtedness secured by said residence. f. Prepare a preliminary analysis of applicant's ability to repay any funds made available to applicant under the program. 4. ~the preparation of all reports and analyses required~ this Agreement, and in approving ~ and/or grant applications, the following policies~ !2&.!..!!!!..!!.!:, followed~~ AuthOrity. 4/83 • I • • - I I • • • - II II (I 1. Use and P~rpose Loans and grants are made available for the purpose of permanent improvements, auditions, or other housing rchnbilit:niou nnd 111ay only be us~d for: A. Repairs and improvements to meet City Code Standards. B. Handicap retrofitting. C. Energy conservation improvements. D •. Elimination of incipient violations of the City Code. E. General property improvements. II. Eligibility for Loans A. Eligible Borrowers. Loans shall be made only to persons who own the property 4n, which the improvements will be made. B. Eligible Properties. Loans ahall be made only for residential properties containing four dwelling units or less located in the City of Englewood. III. Eligibility for Grants A. Eligible Grantees. Grants shall be made only to natural persons who own and reside in the property on which the improvements will be made. Grantees must meet the then current income and asset eligibility limits as set forth by the funding agency. B. Eligible Properties. Grants shall be made only for residential properties located in eligible neighborhoods. IV. Priorities A. Priority Neighborhoods, At least once each year the Authority will determine Priority Neighborhoods. The Priority Neighborhood will be designated in the applicable funding proposals to the State or the City as appropriate, B. Chronological Priority. Upon receipt of an application for a loan and/or grant the ataff ahall note date and time of receipt on the application form, All auch applications shall be acted upon in the same order in which they have been received . V, Priorities for Use of Loan and/or Grant Funds Within each application further priorities are hereby identified to determine the amount of the loan usable for each purpose: first -2- 4/83 • I • ( • • • • priority -funds required to bring property to City Code StanJar~s; second priority -funds for h~ndicap r~trofitting; ~1lrd prloriLy - funds for energy conservation improvements; fourth priority -funds to cure incipient violations of the Code; fifth priority -general property improvements. VI. Loan Limits A. Monetary~~· At least once a year the Authority will determine the loan limits. B. ~!!!!£~Appraisal. Notwithstanding the above, a loan secured by a first deed of trust shall not exceed 90% of the appraisal value of the property as determined by a qualified appraiser. ·If the loan is aecured by a second deed of trust, the total of the first loan .and the property rehabilitation loan shall not exceed 904 of the appraised value of the property as determined by a qualified appraiser. Loans secured by u third or fourth deed of trust shall not exceed 804 of the ap- praised value of the property as determined by a qualified appraiser. VII. Grant Limits At least once a year the Authority will determine the maximum grant amount. VIII • .!::.!.!.!!!. 4/83 A. Loans will be secured by a deed of trust. B. Property improved by a grant shall be secured with a lien thereon. Repayment of the grant in the event of payoff, sale, conveyance or other transfer of the property excluding death, or if the hous- ing unit ia uaed other than aa the grantee(&) primary housing unit, grantee(&) agree to the following repayment conditions: (1) Grantee(&) shall repay 100% of the grant ahould the property be aold, conveyed, tranaferred or delivered during the first twelve months, inclusive, after signing of the Grant Agreement. (2) Grantee(a) ahall repay 80% of the grant should the property be aold, conveyed, tranaferred or delivered during the fol- lowing period of time: 13th through 24th month after signing of the Grant Agreement. (3) Grantee(&) shall repay 60% of the grant should the property be aold, conveyed, transferred or delivered during the fol- lowing period of time: 25th through 36th month after sign- ing of the Grant Agreement. (4) Grantee(&) shall repay 40% of the grant ahould the property be sold, conveyed, transferred or delivered during the fol- lowing period of time: 37th through 48th .anth after signing of the Grant Agreement. -3- • I • - • • • • • (5) Grunt~;:c(s) t>hall repay 20:t of the grunt t>houlu the prut •crl y be sold, conveyed, transferred or delivered during the fol- . lowing period: 49th through 60th month ufter blgning the Grant Agreement. (6) Grantee(s) shall not be required to repay the grnnt should the property be sold, conveyeu, Lrunt>ferreu ur uclivereu following the 60th month after signing of the Grant Agreement. Repayment shall be made to the Program account. IX. Credit Factors for Loan A.. Ability .!£_ Pay. All credit decisions shall be based only on tlw applicant's ability to repay the loan. Action on loans shall not be based on, or influenced by, the race, creed, color, national origin, marital status, sex or age of the applicant. B. ~ ~ ~· The normal interest rate shall be the Authority's current borrowing rate for funds for property rehabilitation purposes, plus a 1% service and administrative fee. c. Less Than Normal Rate Loan. If the applicants are a "moderate", ~ O'r"very low""iticomefamily, and the application meets all other policies the Authority will approve the loan at less than the normal interest rate. X. Loans for Rental Property Loans covering property where the owner is not a resident of the property shall be in accordance with policies set forth by Authority. If the application is approved, the owner shall agrae to enter into a contract with the Authority to keep rents within the reach of low or moderate income families and/or make the property eligible for Federal Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments. Loans for the purposes of general property improvements shall be limited to 30% of the total of the loan approved. XI. Construction Work done with the proceeds of a loan and/or grant shall be accom- plished by a licensed general contractor. XII. Repayment of Loan 4/83 Repayment terms shall not exceed 20 years. Loans shall be repayable in equal installments of principal and interest due on or before the first of each month, I I I -4- • I • • -• • • 5. The Authority or desigu:~ted official ~;hall then mw111ill<' ;uul l 'V" 1- uate the applic~tion, together with all required reports and findings, und either approve, reject, or modify and approve such application. Th" decision of the Authority shall be Unal and binding upon the applicant. 6. The Authority shall require repayment of loans and/or grants as set forth in established policies. 7. All funds repaid by applicants shall be used only for similar loans or grants of housing rehabilitation assistance to applicants approved by the Authority. 8. The Authority or designated official shall approve all loans and/or grants under this program by appropriate action when satisfactory evidence of the following has been aubmitted' to the Authority: a. Applicant has good title to the residence. b. Loan applicants shall have sufficient equity therein to justify aaid loan and/or arant. c. Applicant has entered into a written contract on forms to be approved by the Authority with a person or entity licensed to perform and complete repairs required to rehabilitate the residence. d. That aaid residence, after rehabilitation and repairs, will be maintained in a satisfactory manner. e. Loan applicants should prove an ability to repay the loan. 9. All peraons and entities entering into contracts with applicants for repairs and rehabilitation of any substandard residence shall be an equal opportunity employer and shall comply with all applicable Federal, City and State codes, atatutea and ordinances. 10. The Authority shall aenerally supervise all tion construction and ahall authorize payment for aame performed in accordance with the construction contract cant and approved by Authority. repair and rehabilita- when substantially entered into by appli- 11. The Authority may establish those accounta and allocate thoae funds necessary to fulfill the provisions of thia agreement. 12. The Authority ahall pupare administrative procedure& to implement the intent of this contract and Authority policie&. 13. The Authority shall submit an annual report to the City Co unc il regarding the performance of the program. 14. Thi& Agreement shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their succe&sors. -5- 4/83 • I • - • • • • • • 15. This Agreement supersedes and replaces all other agreements between the parties relating to the program. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed at Englewood, Colorado, this _____ day of , 1984. Attest: Gary R. Higbee, Director of Finance, ex officio City Clerk- Treasurer Approved as to Formz John R. Olsen, City Attorney Attest: Frances Buck Jonas Executive Director CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO a Municipal Corporation By~------~~--~---------------------- Eugene L.:Otis, Mayor ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY By~----~~-----=~------------------Thomas J. Burns , Chairman • I • • - • ( • RESOLUTION NO. j~ SERIES OF 1984 • • • A RESOLUTION DET ERMINING THE RULES OF ORDER AND PROCEDURE GOVERNING MEETINGS BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLE- WOOD. WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 39, Series of 1984 was passed on final reading September 4 , 1984, amending the Englewood Municipal Code by deleting Title I, Chapter 4, Section 10 (Order of Business); and WHEREAS, the Englewood Municipal Code, as amended, provides for the adoption of Council Rules of Order and Procedure by Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt Rules of Order and Procedure governing City Council meetings ; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to implement a consent agenda within its Rules of Order and Procedu r e. NOW, THEREFOR E , BE I T RE S OLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENG L EWOOD, CO L DORADO: The City Counc i l of the City of Englewood hereby adopts and approves the Rules of Order and Procedure attached hereto and made a pa r t hereof by reference. ADOP TED AND APP ROVED this 1st d a y of October, 1 984. E u g en e L. Otis, Mayor ATTES T: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and coaplete copy of Resolution No. , Series of 1984. Gary R. Higbee • I • • • • • • ARTICLES FOR RITES OF ORDER FOR 'lHE E:NGLENX::o CITY CUJNCIL Page No. I. City c:.ot.uril Meetings 1 A. Regular Meetings 1 B. Special Meetings 1 c. Executive Session 1 II. The Presiding Officer 2 A. Mayor 2 B. 1-layor Pro Tan 2 c. Terrporary ChaiJ:nan 2 III. lbll call 2 IV • ~rum 3 • v. Officers and Employees 3 A. Election of Officers and oath of Office 3 B. Afp:>int:nents by the Mayor 3 c. City Manager 3 D. City Attorney 3 E. City Clerk 3 F . Officers and D!ployees to Attend Cbuncil Meetings 3 VI. nities and Privileges of Courx:il Meetins 3 A. Seating Arrangarent 3 B. Presiding Officer 4 c. Getting the Floor 4 D. Interruptions 4 E. Privilege of Closing Debate 4 F. Remarks Entered Into Minutes 4 G. Right of Appeal 4 H. Voting 4 I. Synopsis of Debate 5 J. Personal Privilege 5 K. Dissents and Protests 5 L. Excusal During Meeting 5 • VII. Cbuncil Procedure 5 I A. Order of Business 5 • • f B. Precedence of M:>tions 6 c. M:>tions to be Stated by Olair-witlrlraw 6 D. Division of Question 6 E. Arrerrl -'lb Strike CX!t, etc. 6 F • Amend an Alrenchrent 6 • • • • • • -2- Pa~e tb. VII. Oourcil Procedure (Continued) G. r.t:ltion to Fbstpone 6 H. Ayes am Nays 7 I. Reconsideration 7 J. Dnergercy Ordinances 7 K. Procedure in Absence of ~e 7 L. Anonyrrous Ccmrtmications 7 M. Tie 'K>tes 7 N. Ordinances, Resolutions, r.t:ltions, arrl Contracts 7 l. Introduction 7 2. Review 8 3. Procedure of Passage 8 4 . &lbsti tute Ordinances 8 o. Jlddressing the Council 8 l. Written camunications 8 2. Oral <hmuni.cations 8 3. Reading of Protests 9 P. Manner of J\ddressing/T.i.rre Limit 9 Q. Decorum 9 R. Suspensioo of ~es 9 s. l\me!n3rrent of Rules 9 T. ' Public Hearing 9 I • • • • • I. • I • • • .. ARTICLES FOR RULES OF ORDER FOR THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL City Council Meetings A. Regular Meetings Regular meetings of the City Council shall be held in the City Hall on the first and third Mondays of each month at 7:30 p.m.; provided, however, that when the day fixed for any regular meeting falls upon a day designated by law as a legal or national holiday, such meeting shall be held at the same hour on the next succeeding day not a holiday. B. Special Meetings The Mayor shall call special meetings of the Council when- ever in his/her opinion the public business may require it, or at the express written request of any three (3) members of the Council. Whenever a special meeting shall be called, a summons or a notice in writing signed by the Mayor or City Manager shall be served upon each member of the Council, either in person or by notice left at his/her place of resi- dence, stating the date and hour of the meeting and the purpose for which such meeting is called, and no business shall be transacted thereat except such as is stated in the notice. Notice of a special Council meeting may be announced by the Mayor at any regular Council meeting and when so announced a written notice shall not be required. Notice of special Council meeting, whether written or oral, shall be served , at least twenty-four (24) hours before the special meeting is to be held, upon each Councilman not absent from the City or from the regular Council meeting when announced; provided, always, that if, after diligent effort is made to give notice of any such meeting to all members of Council, notice of the same cannot be given due to an inability to locate any member, a majority of the entire Council may waive notice of special Coun ci l meeting in writing or by affirmative ballot, and such waiver shall be specifically noted in the minutes of the meeting. Notice may be waived by the entire membership of Council in any case. C. Executive Session An executive session may be convened on call of the Mayor or by a majority vote of the members of City Council. Attendance at the executive session shall be limited to the members of the City Council and members of the executive staff. The City Council may invite such other persons as may be required for advice and information. • I • • - • • • • • • • Page 2 II. The A. The City Council may call an executive session to deal with the following items: (1) The sale or purchase of property for public purposes; (2) Attorney/client privileges; (3) Special security arrangements; (4) Negotiations with employees or employee organizations; (5) Personnel issues. Under executive session, no for.al vote shall be taken on any matter under discuss ion . Presiding Officer Mayor The presiding officer of th City Co uncil shall be the Mayor who shall be elected by secret ballot by the members of the City Council at the first ~eting in January after each general municipal election. The presiding officer shall preserve strict order and decorua at all regular and special meetings of the City Council. He /she shall state every question coming before the City Council, announce the decision of City Council on all subjects and decide all questions of order, subject, however, to an appeal of the Council in which event a aajority vote of those Council Members present and voting shall govern and conclusively determine such questions awarded. He/she shall vote on all questions, his/her name being called last, he/she shall sign all ordinances adopted by the Council during his/her presence. B. Mayor ProTem The Mayor Pro Tem shall be elected by secret ballot by the members of the Council at the first meeting in January after each general municipal election. The Mayor Pro Tem shall serve as Mayor during the absence or disability of the Mayor and in case of a vacancy in the office of Mayor pending a selection of a new successor. C. Temporary Chairman The Mayor, or in his/her absence the Mayor ProTem, shall call the Council to order. In the absence of the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem, the City Clerk or his/her assistant shall call the Council to order, whereupon a temporary chairman shall be elected by the members of the Council present. Such temporary chairman shall serve as presiding officer of the Council until the arrival of the Mayor or the Mayor Pro Tem, at which time the temporary chairman shall immediately relinquish the chair upon the conclusion of the business immediately before the Council. III. Roll Call Before proceeding with the business of the Council, the City Clerk or his/her deputy shall call the roll of the members, and the names of those present shall be entered in the minutes • • I • • • • • • • • • Page 3 I V. Quorum Five (5) members of the Council shall constitute a quorum at any regular or special meeting of the Council. In the absence of a quorum, the presiding officer shall, at the instance of any three (3) members present, compel the attendance of absent members. V. Officers and Employees A. Election of Officers and Oath of Office A majority vote of all members of Council shall be required to elect a Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem. The Municipal Judge shall administer the oath of office to the Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem before the Council no later than the next regular meeting following the election. B. Appointments by the Mayor Whenever the Mayor submits an appointment to be made with the advice and consent of Council consideration of such appoint- ment; that appointment shall be deferred until the next meeting, or except that by general consent or majority vote of the Council the appointment may be effective immediately. C. City Manager The City Manager shall attend all meetings of the City Council unl ess excused by the Counc il or his designated representative. He /she shall keep the Counci l fully advised as to the financial c onditions and needs o f the City. He/she may make reco.aen- dat i ons to the Council and may take part in discussions on all ma t t ers c oncerni ng the welf are of the City but shall have n o vote in the meet i ngs of Coun c il. D. City Attorney Th e Ci ty Attorne y ei t he r in person or by deputy shall attend all meetings o f the Co un cil . An y member of the Council may at any t iae c a ll upon t he City At tor ney f or an oral or written o pinion relative to any munici pal matter or for the preparation o f a bill for an o r dinance upon any subject. E . City Cler k The City Clerk shall be ex officio Clerk o f the Counc il and shall be responsible for k eep i n g the minutes o f t he me e t i ng; and either the Clerk or a deputy s ha l l pe rform such other and fu r ther duties in the meeting a s ma y be ord e red by the Mayor, City Manager or Council. On t he Thursday be fore each regu l ar Council meeting, the Clerk shall have delivered to each Council Member a copy of the complete summary of minutes for t h e preceding meeting. F. Officers and Employees to Attend Council Meetings The head of any department or any officer or any employee of the City when requested by the City Manager shall attend any regular or special meeting and confer with the Council on matters relating to the City. VI. Du ties and Privileges of Council Members A. Seating Arrangement Members shall occupy their respective seats in the Council Chamber assigned to them by the Mayor. But any two or more members may exchange seats by jo\ning in a written notice to the Mayor to that effect • • I • • • • • • • Page 4 B. Presiding Officer The K3yor or such other member of the Council as may be presiding, may move, second and debate from the Chair, subject only to such limitations of debate as are by these rules imposed on all members and shall not be deprived of any of the rights and privileges of a Council Member by reason of his acting as the presiding officer. C. Getting the Floor D. E. F. G. H. Every member desiring to speak shall address the chair. Upon recognition by the presiding officer shall confine himself/ herself to the question under debate avoiding all personalities and indecorous language. Interruptions A member once recognized shall not be interrupted when speaking unless it be to call him/her to order or as herein otherwise provided. If a member, while speaking, be called to order, he/she shall cease speaking until the question of order be determined and if in order, he/she shall be permitted to proceed. Privilege of Closing Debate The Council Member moving the adoption of an ordinance or reso- lution shall have the privilege of closing the debate. Remarks Entered Into Minutes A Council Member may request through the presiding officer the privilege of having an abstract of his/her statement on any subject under consideration by the Council entered in the minutes. If the Council consents thereto, such statement shall be entered in the minutes • Right Of Appeal Any member may appeal to the Council from a ruling of the pre- siding officer. If the appeal is seconded, the member making the appeal may briefly state his/her reason for the same. The presiding officer may briefly explain his/her ruling; but there shall be no debate on the appeal and no other member shall participate in the discussion. The presiding officer shall then put the question "Shall the decision of the chair be sustained?" If a majority of the members present vote "Yes" the ruling of the chair is sustained; otherwise it is over- ruled. Voting A vote shall be taken by rec ording ""Aye " and ""Nay·· votes by use of voting lights, with the "Aye·· and "Nay·· being read into the permanent record by the City Clerk or a deputy. A vote shall be taken upon the passage of all ordinances and reso- lutions, on the appointment of any officer, on all motions concerning the expenditure of funds, and entered in the minutes of the Council proceedings. Every ordinance shall require the affirmative vote of the majority of all members of the Council for passage. No member of the Council shall vote on any question in which he/she has a financial interest other than the co-.on public interest or on any question concerning his/her own conduct but on all other questions each member who is present shall vote unless excused by the unanimous consent of the remaining members present. Any member refusing to vote except when not so required by this • I • ( • Page 5 • • • paragraph shall be guilty of misconduct in office. Appli- cation to be excused from voting must be made before the votes are called for. The member having briefly stated the reason for his/her request, the decision thereon shall be made without debate. I. Synopsis of Debate The Clerk may be directed by the presiding officer with the consent of the Council to enter in the minutes a synopsis of the discussion on any question coming regularl y before the Council. J. Personal Privilege The right of a member to address the Council on a question of personal privilege shall be limited to cases in which his/her integrity, character, or motives are assailed, questioned, or impuned. K. Dissents and Protests Any member shall have the right to express dissent from, or protest against any ordinance or resolution of Council, and shall have the reason therefore entered in the minutes. Such dissent or protest must be couched in respectful language and presented to Council not later than the next regular meeting following the date of passage of the ordinance or resolution objected to. L. Excusal During Meeting No member may leave the Council Chamber while in regular session without permission from the presiding officer. VII. Council Procedure A. Order of Business All meetings except informal meetings of the Council shall be open to the public. The matters to be deliberated by the Council shall be considered and disposed of in the following order except where otherwise deci ded by a majority vote of Council members present at said meeting . (1) Call to order. (2) Invocation. (3) Pledge of allegiance. (4) Roll call. (5) Consideration of minutes of previous session . (6) Recognition of pre-scheduled citizens and visitors. (7) Recognition of non-scheduled citizens and visitors. (8) Co.munications and proclamations. (9) Consent agenda items. (10) Public hearing items. (11) Ordinance, resolutions, and motions. (12) City Manager report. (13) City Attorney report. (14) General Discussions; Mayor's Choice; Council Kember's Choice. (15) Adjourn•ent. • I • ( • Page 6 • • .. The business of all regular meetings shall be transacted in the order provided for above unless Council by a majority vote of all members present shall suspend the rules and change the order. On the Thursday preceding the regular Council meeting, the City Manager will have delivered to each Council Member an agenda showing the order of business and indicating the public hearings to be anticipated as a result of previous action of Council, planning or other commissions. Also listed will be ordinances for first or second reading, petitions previously presented to the Clerk's office and a list of the reports of special committees, the City Manager or City Attorney. At each meeting it shall be asked by the presiding officer if there are objections or are corrrections to be made to the summary of minutes of the preceding meeting as published. If there are no objections, the summary of minutes shall be approved. B. Precedence of Motions When a question is before the Council, no motion shall be entertained except: (1) To fix the hour of adjournment; (2) To adjourn; (3) To lay on the table; (4) To ask for the previous question; (5) To postpone to a certain day; (6) To refer; (7) To amend; and (8) To postpone indefinitely. These motions shall have precedence in the order indicated. Any such motion, except a motion to amend and a motion to postpone indefinitely, shall be put to a vote without debate. C. Motions to be Stated by Chair -Withdraw Any member may demand that a motion be put in writing. A motion may not be withdrawn by the mover without the approval of Council. D. Division of Question If the question contains two or more divisible propositions, the presiding officer may and upon request of a member divide the same. E. Amend-To Strike Out, etc. On an amendment to strike out and insert, the paragraph to be amended shall be read, as it stands, first. Then the words proposed to be striken out and those to be inserted shall be read finally, the paragraph as it would stand, if so amended, shall be read. F. Amend an Amendment G. An amendment of a motion shall be in order, but one to amend an amendment to an amendment shall not be introduced. An amendment modifying the intention of a motion shall be in order, but an amendment relating to a different matter shall not be in order. Motion to Postpone All motions to postpone, except a motion to postpone indefi- nitely, may be amended as to time if the motion to postpone indefinitely is carried, the principal question shall be declared lost • • I • • ( • • • • Page 7 H. Ayes and Nays On the passage of every ordinance or resolution, and on the appointment of any officer, on all motions concerning the expenditure of funds, the vote shall be taken by ayes and nays and entered in full in the record. Every member present shall be required to vote unless excused for cause by unanimous consent of the remaining members of the Council present. The vote shall be for or against a pending ordinance or resolution and not the report of the committee thereon. I. Reconsideration A motion to reconsider any action taken by the Council may be made at any time subject only to the following limitations. Passage of an ordinance may be reconsidered at any time prior to the time such ordinance becomes effective. Any actions of the Council having as its ultimate purpose, the vesting of any contractual or quasi-contractual right, may be considered at any time before the actual vesting of such right. A motion to reconsider must be made by one of the prevailing sides but may be seconded by any member, a motion to reconsider may be made at any time and have precedence over all other motions, and while the maker of the motion has the floor; it shall be debatable. Nothing herein shall be construed to prevent any member of the Council from making or remaking the same or any other motion at a subsequent meeting of the Council. J. Emergency Ordinances K. L. M. N. Emergency ordinances necessary for the immediate preservation of public property, health, peace or safety may be introduced and read. Such ordinance must be unanimously approved by a quorum present at any meeting of the Council. The facts showing such urgency and need shall be specifically stated in the ordinance. No ordinance shall receive final passage on the same day it is introduced; however, emergency ordinances may receive final passage by Council on the following day. Emergency ordinances shall take effect immediately upon final passage and shall be published within seven (7) days thereof. No ordinance making a grant of any special privilege, levying taxes, incurring indebtedness, authorizing borrowing money, or fixing rates charged by any City-owned utility shall ever be passed as an emergency measure. Procedure in Absence of Rule Roberts Rules of Order, Revised shall govern the procedure of the meeting in all cases where applicable and where consistent with the Charter or the rules or proceedings herein fixed by the Council. Anonymous Communications Unsigned communications shall not be introduced at City Council meetings. Tie Votes • I • • Page 8 o. ( • • • • and other matters or subjects requiring action by the Council must be introduced by a member of the Council except that the City Manager or City Attorney may present ordinances, resolutions and other matters or subjects to the Council and any Council member may assume sponsorship of any ordinances, resolutions or subjects. (2) Review All proposed ordinances shall be reviewed by the City Attorney and bear his/her certification that they are in correct form. The City Manager shall attach to each proposed ordinance a brief digest of the provision thereof and where it is propo sed to amend an existing ordinance. Said digest shall indicate the change sought to be made and shall also show the name of the department or party at whose request the proposed ordinance was prepared. (3) Procedure of Passage An ordinance may be introduced as a bill at any regular meeting by any member of the Council. Upon introduction, the bill shall be read or printed a first time in full and Council may set the day and hour at which Council shall hold a public hearing thereon. A bill, before its final passage , shall be presented at one additional meeting of the Council which meeting must be held no earlier than seven (7 ) days after publication of the bill for an ordinance in its final amended form, except in the case of an emergency ordinance. After final passage, every ordi nance shall again be published by reference or in f ull a s Council aay deteraine. (4) Substitute Ordinances If an ordi nanc e is proposed as an amendment to a n existing ordi nance , it s ha ll be reported as a substitute ordi nance. A subst itute o rd inance shall be a c coapanied by an e xh i b i t showi ng the pa r t of t he origina l o rdinance to be ame nd e d, properly i dentified by page, s e c t i on , or paragr aph , r ef e rencing to the or i gina l o rd i nance , and hav i n g a line drawn through the parts st r ick en out a nd t h at pa rt added s hown in italics or in a different colored ink or under- scored. Copies of the exhibits shall be furnished to each member of Council. Ad dressing the Council Any person desiring to address the Council shall first secure the permission of the presiding officer to do so. (1) Written Coaaunications Interested parties may address the Council by written co..unications in regard to matters then under discussion . (2) Or a l Communications Inter ested parties may a dd ress the Council by oral coa- municationa on any aatter concerning the City's busineaa or any matter over which the Co uncil has control; provi de d however, that preference s hall be given to those persona • I • • Page 9 • • - who may have notified the City Manager in advance of their desire to speak in order that the same may appear on the agenda of the Council, (3) Reading of Protests Interested persons may address the Council by reading of protests, petitions, or communications, relating to zoning, sewer and street proceedings, hearings on protests, appeals and petitions, or similar matters in regard to subjects then under consideration, P. Manner of Addressing/Time Limit Each person addressing the Council shall give their name and address for the record and shall limit their address to a reasonable time. The length of such remarks may be specifically limited by the presiding officer. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body and not to any member thereof. No persons other than the Council and the person having the floor shall be perudtted to enter into any discussion, either directly or through a member of the Council without the permission of the presiding officer. No question shall be asked a Council member except through the presiding officer. Q. Decorum While the Council is in session, the members must preserve order and decorum, A member shall neither by conversation or otherwise delay or interrupt the proceedings or the peace of the Council nor disturb any member while speaking or refuse to obey the orders of the Council or its presiding officer. R. Suspension of Rules Any provision of these rules not governed by the Charter or Code may be temporarily suspended at any meetings of the Council by a majority vote of all members of the Council. The vote on any such suspension shall be taken by ayes and nays and entered in the record. S. Aaendment of Rules T. These rules may be amended or new rules adopted by majority vote of all members of the Council. Any such amendments shall be submitted in writing at the preceding regular meeting and shall be placed on the agenda of the City Council, Public Hearing All those desiring to be heard on a particular issue at a regular public hearing before Council may list their names indicating on which aide of the issue, whether for or against, they wish to speak. This list will be handed to the presiding officer who will have all those who are listed step forward to attest by sworn oath that all evidence they present will be the truth. If both sides of the issue are represented by one or more individuals, the Council will set the length of time to be heard. Each side will be given an equal time to present their case. This will be a total time within which all those desiring to be heard will be confined. Following the presentations of those in favor, then those opposed, the petitioner will be given a few •inutea for rebuttal. At any stage in the hearing, either aide .. y cross exa~ne any witnesses heretofore presented but the time for this will be included in the original allotted. Following the • I • • - Page 10 c_ I • • • • rebuttal of the petitoner, the presiding officer will declare the hearing closed and the question remanded to Council for consideration. If any Council member wishes more information froa any individual who spoke at the hearing, he/she aay direct his/her question only through the presiding officer, to the individual and the response will be liaited to the answer of the question as stated. • I . • • • • C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT September 27, 1984 ib Recreation Center Landscape Materials B~ INITIATED BY ~~Mruwg~~e~r~'~s_O~f~f~i~ce~--------------------------------- ACT I ON PROPOSED Award of Bid for Englewood Recreation Center Landscape Materials Introduction The Englewood Coor!lmity Center presently under construction is scheduled to open in early January 1985. The Parks Division has elected to provide labor and equipnent for landscape of the building with plant materials supplied through canpetitive bid. Landscape will begin as soon as the parking lot and rough grading is canpleted by the contractor. Use of the Parks Division labor force will allow for trore landscape materials and a quality job. Background Competitive sealed bids were solicted through City procedures and opended September 26, 1984. All materials requested in this bid are to be provided to the City between October 15 through October 31 for landscape of the Camllnity Center. Materials as selected will provide for a colorful quality landscape. There were ~ bidders for landscape materials. Reccmnendation It is recommended to select the low bid of Greenspot Nurseries for landscape materials for a total of $26,850.00. Landscape materials estimate was $27,000.00. Financial A total sun of $80, 000 has been OOdgeted for landscape of the Englewood Recreation Center. Approval of the tree bid plus this landscape materials bid totals $58,450.00. Sprinkler system materials are estimated@ $12,000.00, totaling inmediate landscape costs to $70,450.00. Costs for equiJillent rentals , 111llch, filter fabric, planting mixes and other miscellaneous costs are expected to approximate $5,000 .00, for a grand total landscape cost of $75,450.00. I wuld recommend the remaining $4, 550.00 or 5. 6% fund balance be available as a contingency fund. • I • - • • • • .ENUlon:>D RECREATIOO CEm'ER PIANr MA'IERIAUi BID SI.M1ARY Greenspot !brseries M:nntain Medows !brsery Parks & Recreation Department Estimate • Total M!ount $26,850.00 29,296 .50 $27,000.00 I . - • • • • C 0 U N C I L C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N DATE AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT Sept. 27, 1984 <i?c.. Recreation Center Trees Bid INITIATED BY City Manager's Office ACTION PROPOSED Award of Bid for Englewood Recreation Center Trees Introduction The Englewood Recreation Center presently under construction is scheduled to open in early January 1985. The Parks Division has designed landscaping and sprinkler plans for total landscape of the building and parking lot, and has elected to perfonn all labor to provide a quality and extensive landscape for the ., building. ( Backgrruld Bids were soliceted by City procedures to purchase 46 large trees for landscape purposes, both evergreen and deciduous varieties in 5" -6" caliper sizes . Ever- green are to be 16' -18' in size. Altl¥Jugh we are planning to do JOOst of the landscaping in October , the large &.lrr Oaks , Red Oaks, Horsechestnut and Golden Raintrees will be planted in early Spring. Spring plantings of these variteies will prevent the predicable winter kill and/or severe die back that can be expected if these trees are planted now. There were ~ ~series wb:> sul:mitted bids f or trees . Reccmnendation It is recatmel'lded that we award bid of Specimen trees to the low bidder, lblntain Meadows Nurseries in the artDunt of $31,600.00. Financial A total figure of $80,000 has been budgeted for Camunity Cen ter landscape. Award of this bid leaves sufficient balances for other landscape ma t erials and sprinkler system. Tree cost estimate by the City was $33,000.00. • I . - ' ( ( • • • • fXUKX)D RECREATI<Ii CEm:R SPECIM.M 'mEE BID RESULTS ~ M:uttain Medows tbrsery Green Spot ~series Parks & Recreation Department Estimate • Total Aloount $31,600.00 35,150.00 $33,000.00 I . .