The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1983-04-18 (Regular) Meeting AgendaCity Council Meeting -Regular April 18, 1983 • • - • 0 ,. City Council Meeting April 18, 1983 • • - RESOLUTION # 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ORDINANCE I I 17, 18, 19, 20 • 0 • I . • - ~/)~/>~.-· flj '-1 ROL L CAL L 4;f-1J u '/ ,' 3-tJ(j m . Moved Seconded Ay es Na y Ab sent Abstain Hi gda y Ne a l Fl t z oa trick Weist Bi lo Brad sh aw Ot is ~ fi..__%~ ..._),~ '+ IU>l d_ (,¥~ o CJ~ c_fruu)-. ~ p j/{r .:'i!>+- alA~~ u .(o-~ I . • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Haqdav ~ Neal (..._. Fitzpatrick L-- Weist I-- Bi lo v- Bradshaw ........- Otis t--- I . • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Abse nt Ab stain Hiqdav Neal ~ Fl tz pa t rick Weist Bi lo v Brad shaw Ot is /t:L-. • I • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Higdav Neal Fltzoatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis I • • • • • • - ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes ' Nay Absent Abstain Higday Neal Fl tzpatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis \ I . • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain .... v Hi gday l Neal I Fl tzoat rick 7 We i st I Bi to I v Bradshaw I Oti s \ "' • I • • • - • • -- ROLL CALL Moved Second d e Ayes Nay Absent Abstain c 1 f Hiqdav I I 1 1-Neal L-Fitzoatrick ~ Weist I...._ Bi lo 1-Bradshaw I...-Otis I • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hiqday Neal Fltzoatrick Weist Bilo Bradshaw Otis c!J. I • • • • • • ROLL CALL ~eve d Seconded A~s Nay Absent Abstain HiQOav l v Neal Fi tzoatrick I Weist I Bi lo v Bradshaw I Oti s "- A I • • • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes N Ab ay sent Abstain Hi qdav Neal Fitzpatrick Wei st Bi lo Bradshaw Otis I . • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Na y Ab sent Abstain HlgCfay Neal Fitzpat rick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Oti s I . • • - • . . • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Hay Absent Abstain L V ~iQday L-v Heal L I Fltzoatrick Wei s t v-- I - - Ri lo - L-I Bradshaw I Otis I ) • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain - 1- v In qday l-Neal I-Fi tzoatri ck 1 Weist '-Bi lo v Bradshaw Otis -- !JU 1'-~;).IJ D I u.... ~ ~ e. T 4-~tJD ,P-t ~f~ z-t,ut"LL~ ft J I . • • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1gday I Neal r Fitzpatrick v- Weist I Bi lo 1 Bradshaw I Otis I I • • • • • • ----------------------------------- ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ay¥ Nay Absent Abstain Higday Neal Fi tzoatrick I Wei st l ,_,... Bi lo v-Bradshaw Otis I . • • - • ,· • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Na y Absent Abstain Hiqday -Nea Fitznatrick Weist Ri lo Bradshaw Otis I . • • • ROLL CALL Hove d s d d econ e A~ Hay Ab sent Abstain -RTildav I -Heal I Fi tzoat rick 7 Weist Bi lo .........-Bradshaw Otis \ I • • • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain ' Hiqdav \ c./' Neal 1 ...... Fitzpatrick I Weist 7 Bi lo I Bradshaw I Otis r ~ #IS I • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1qoa-v \ Neal I ..-Fitzpatrick I ... Weist I Bi lo v Bradshaw Otis \,_ , • • I • • • • - • .. • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Higdav Neal Fltzoatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis 0 • I . • • • • ROLL CALL l'loved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain -H'Igday I ~ Neal c:::;7' Fitzoatrick Wei s t I Bi lo - Bradshaw - Otis I - • • • • ROLL CALL Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain v Higday - Neal - Fitzoatrick - Weist - Bi lo -v Bradshaw - Otis - I . • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain -v Higday \ Neal l Fitzpatrick I Weist I Bi lo I v Bradshaw I Otis \ "'-. 6 ~. II {/ I . • - • • ROLL CALL Second d Moved e Ayes Nay Absent Abstain , -Hladav I Neal - 1--Fi tznat rick Wei st -- I--Ri lo Brad shaw -t -I Otis I ~ -------------- I • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlqday I Neal ~ Fitzoatrick I Weist I Silo I Bradshaw I Otis I I . • • • .. • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Higday Neal v Fl tzoatrick Weist v Bi lo Bradshaw Otis I • • • • - • • ROLL CALL N Absent Abstain Ayes a y ......., Seconded Moved I -j nigday r Nea_l_ r-Fitzoatrick Weist --.--Bi lo ,........ Bradshaw - L 1 Otis ../ - -- • • I • • • • • • • ROLL CALL ~s Nay Absent Abstain Moved Seconded -T Hioday \ Neal L- v Fitzoatrick L I 1..... Weist I ---v Bi lo I '-- Bradshaw I Otis \ ~ - I • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ay es Nay Absent Abstain Tlgday Neal Fl tzoatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis • I • • • • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1qaav Neal Fl tzpatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis I . • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hiqday Neal Fl tzoatrick Wei st Bi lo Bradshaw -Oti s 9!J - I • • • • • • r ~/'A LA-Secon de d fi'Vl Ayes Na y 1-- Hi qday Absent Ab stain Ne al I Fitzoatrick --- - Mo ve d 1-- >----- Wei s t 1- Bi lo L Bradshaw I Otis - I =t 6b. ~-~()a s/t---~~ I • 7 :30 P .M. 1. • • - AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL APRIL 18, 1983 --F,Y Call to order , invocation by Reverend Adrian House, First Christian Church, 3190 South Grant Street, pledge of allegiance by Boy Scout Troops #115 and #154, and roll call. /(j~t-- Minutes. (a) Minutes of the special meeting of March 28, ~~ ~·~~·~1983. (Copie• enclo•ed.) ~ 2. ~~-Scheduled Visitors . (Please limit your pre- sentation to 10 minut s .) (a) Ms. t-1argar t Caouett , President of the Ladies Auxiliary to V F .W. Post #322, will be present to accept a proclamation proclaim- ing April 29, 30 and May 1, 1983 as Buddy Poppy Days . (Copies enclosed.) 3. Other Visitors. (Pl se limit your presentation to 5 minutes.) 4 . Public H aring . (a) To consid r m nte; ncloa s-I . • • • Page 2 April 18, 1983 Agenda 5. Communications -No Action Recommended . (a) Hinutes of the Board of Career Service Com- missioners meeting of February 17, 1983 . (Copies enclosed .) (b) Minutes of the Englewood Housing Authority meeting of February 23, 1983. (Copies enclosed.) (c) Minutes of the Urban Renewal Authority meetings of February 24, March 2 and 23, 1983. (Copies enclosed .) (d) Minutes of the Liquor License Authority meeting of Harch 16, 19 83. (Copies enclosed .) (e) Minutes of the Englewood Downtown Mana~ement Committee meetings of March 17 and Apr~l 7, 1983. (Copies enclosed.) (f) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of March 22, 1983 . (Copies enclosed .) (g) Memorandum from the Director of Public Works concerning the Annual City Cleanup to be held in Hay. (Copies enclosed.) 6. Communications -Action Recommended. (a) Council Communication from the Planning and Zoning Commission concerning names assigned to private streets or drive s. (Copies enclos d .) (b) Memorandum from the Mun icipal Court Judge recommending an appointment of an Associa t Judge. (Copies enclosed .) ..,) ~(c) " Lett r from Scot R. Cook, Member of th Water and Sewer Board , concerning his resignation from tha Board . (Copies enclosed .) 7 . City A orn y. Ordinanc on Fin 1 R ding. (a) • h I • • • • • Page 3 April 18, 1983 Agenda 7 . City Attorney (Continued). Bill for an Ordinance . (b) Bill approving an agreement with School District No. 1, Arapahoe County, Colorado, Branting City of Englewood, Colorado, an easement to use school property for a storm water detention !?f l ~ c~ \ 8. area and establishing other related terms and conditions, and repealing Ordinance No. 21, Series of 1982 . (Copies enclosed.) Proclamation. (c) Proclamation proclaiming the week of April 17-23, 1983 to honor and recognize volun teers. (Copies enclosed .) Other Hatters . (d) City of Englewood vs . licLaughl in. (Copies enclosed .) (e) City Attorney's Choice.-~ City Manager. (a) City \an g r's Choice. 9 . G ner 1 Di cus ion . (a) ~ yor's Choic . (b) Council mb r's Choic 10. Adjournm nt . AM/ab I • • • • • • jtJ-- SPECIAL MEETING: COUNCIL CHA MBER S City of Englewood, Colorado, March 28 , 1983 The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe Coun - ty, Colorado , met in special session at 7 :30 p.m. on Mar ch 28 , 1983 . Mayor Otis , presiding, c a lled the meeting to order. The invocation was given by Coun c il Member Fitzpatr ic k. The pledge of allegiance was led by Mayor Otis. Mayor Otis asked for rol l cal l . Upon a call of the r oll , the fo l lo wing were present: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick , Weist, Bilo, Bradsha w, Otis . Absent: None. Mayor Oti s d e clared a qu o rum pr ese n t . • • • • • • • Al s o presen t were: Ci t y Manag r McCo wn Ci t y At torn e y DeW i t Dir ec o r of Pub lic Wo rk s Wa g g one r Dir ecto r of Eng i n ee ring Serv ic s Died e Depu y Ci y Clerk Watkin s • • • • • • • CO UN CIL MEMBER FITZ PA TRICK MOVED TO OP EN TH E PUBL IC HE AR- ING TO CO NSIDER PA VI NG DIST RICT NO. 26 . Council M mb r Bilo sec- ond d he mo ion . Upon c 11 of h roll , the vo e resul ed ~s follows: 1-.y s: Council Memb rs Fitzp rick, w ist , Bilo , Br N ys: Non The M yor: d cl red h 1110 ion c rr ied. .. • • • • • • • I • • • . • I • March 28, 1983 Page 2 • • • Mayor Otis stated the purpose of the public hearing was to determine whether the assessments made on Paving District No. 28 should be changed from what already has been established. Mayor Otis noted the City increased its percentage share of the costs in this paving district for the first time in the history of paving districts. Director of Engineering Services Diede provided informa- tion concerning Paving District No. 28 inclusive of the assess - ment procedure. Director Diede read into the record the following letters received by the City in protest to the district: 1. Alice Kay McLaughlin, 3959 South Acom u Street. 2 . Mark Richardson, 3195 South Bellaire Street, Denver, owner of property at 2990 South Logan Street. 3 . Rosalie J. Lay, 5530 South Lowell Blvd., Littleton, on behalf of Mrs. Margaret Currey, 3792 South Ac oma. 4. K. B. McGill , 2238 W st Caley Place, Littleton, owner of property at 3669 South Acoma Pl ace . 5. Me lvin Butterfield, 27 48 South Logan . 6. Mr. and Mrs. I. J. Trayno r, 3881 South Cla rks on , owners of prop r y a 2995 South Logan. 7. Rob r W. Smith, 22 Log Cabin Lane, P arl Riv r, LA , o wn er of proper y a 3399 West Grand Aven ue . Of ice Enqin er , Rick Kahm, presented slid s illus ra ing he s andards for upgrading the s reets. Mr. Kahm also pr sen d da a for d ermining h ss m n fac or. Director Diede stat d a 1 r da ed February 25, 198 wa s sen out to ach affect d property owner explaining he ass ssmen cost , notifying the owner of his public hearing, and explaining he m thod o p ymen • M yor 0 sp ak cone rn1ng w no r spons . M yor Otis cone rn1ng h no r pon • • * • • • • • sked if ther wa nyone pr s n wishing to a s ssm n s ot 3 00 South Acoma S r Th r • • * • s anyon 700 Sou • • • to Th r I • _. • March 28 , 1983 Page 3 • • * * • • • * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments of 3800 South Acoma Street. Pam Byrne , 3885 South Acoma, came forward. o Ms. Byrne's question , City Attorney DeWitt stated to reduce the amount of the assessment cost would be he period that offers the 5% discount. * * * • • * * In response the only way to pay within Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments of 3900 South Acoma Street. There was no response. * * * • * * • Mayor Otis asked if ther was anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments of 4000 South Acoma Street. There was no response. * • * * • Mayor Otis asked if her was anyon presen wishing to speak concerning the assessmen s of 4 500 Sou h Acoma S reet. Th re wa s no response. * • • • • • * wa s wishing to Mayor Otis asked if her nyone pre sen concerning th ss ssmen s of 2700 Sou h Logan Street . Ther speak w s no respons . • • • * • • • Mayor 0 is was anyon pr en wishing 0 cone rninq he 2800 Sou h Log n S re Th r no respon • • • • • • • nyon pr nt wishing 0 p k ass outh I. gan 5 re T te was * • • • • I • March 28, 1983 Page 4 • • • Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wish ing to speak concerning the assessments of 3000 South Logan Street . Clark McKay 3096 South Logan, came forward. Mr. McKay protested on the basis he was on a fixed income and it woul d be difficult to pay the assessment. Further Mr. McK ay s ated in his opinion the street did not need repair. Mayor Otis referred Mr. Mct<ay to the Engineering Services Department for further explanation as to why the street nee ded r - pair. Council Memb er Neal stated the City's deferral ass ss- ment program wa s available, and recommended that Mr. McKay in- vestigate for possible qualification. * * * * • * • Mayor Otis asked if here was anyone pre sen wishing to speak conce rning th assessmen s of 2700 West Union Avenue. ryan 4732 South D catur, came forward. Mr. Neal asked for in for concerning assessments charged 0 cross r t<ahm offer d 0 xplain he assessm n cos nto his of ice. * • • • • • • present to s h Acoma s Th re .., • • • • • • * yor 0 1& pres n wi hing 0 h B llwood Driv . pon • * * • * wishln 0 cone Driv . w * * * • * • wi hfnq 0 Otlv . I • March 28, 1983 Page 5 * * * * • • • * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to s peak concerning the assessments of 2800 West Chenango Avenue. There was no response. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to s pe ak co ncerning the assessments of 2900 West Chenango Avenue. There was no response . * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to s peak c oncerning the assessments o f 3400 Wes Chenango Avenue. The r e wa s no response. * * * * * * * Ma y o r Otis asked if th e r e wa s a nyone pr es ent wishing to speak co nce rning the assessments of 3500 Wes t Chenang o Avenue. The r e was no r es po nse. * • * * • • * Ma yo r 0 is s k ed if he r sp ak concerning he assessme n s o Th re w s no res ponse . was a n yone p re se n wis hing 3000 Wes Gr and Av enu e . 0 * Mayor C is as sp ak concerning h as s no respon • • * * d if her was anyon ssm n s of 3100 w s • • * w nyone * * p r e n wishi ng o Grand Avenu • Ther • * pre sen wishing to 200 w Gr nd Avenu . Ther 8 k w s • * 81 * * * • nyon 00 w • * * pr 1 n wiahln to Gr nd Av nu Th r I • -• • • (,.? March 28, 1983 Page 6 C I • * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments of 3400 West Grand Avenue. There was no response. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak co ncerning the assessments of 3500 West Grand Avenue. There was no response. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak conce rning the assessments of 2800 West Layton Avenue. There was no response. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments of 2900 West Layton Avenue. There was no response. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak concerning h assessments of 3000 West Monmouth Avenue. There was no response. * • • • * Mayor 0 is ask d if here was anyon sp ak concerning h ass ssm n s of 3100 W s There was no response. * Mayor Otis p ak concerning h Ther was no response. * M yor Oti ak d p k cone rnlng he s no r s ons • * * * * * there w s anyon sn n s o 3200 Wes • • • • • • • • • * * present wishing o Monmouth Avenue. * * pre ent wishing to Monmouth lw nue. * • n • wishing 0 Co Oriv • Th r • • I • • • • • C.! March 28, 1983 Page 7 «I Mayor Otis asked if ther e was anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments of 3100 West Pimlico Drive. There was no response. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments of 3200 West Pimlico Drive. There was no response. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if ther e was anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments o f 3000 Wes t Radcliff. Th e re was no response. * * * * * * * Mayor Ot is a s k e d if t her e was anyo n e pre s en t wi sh i ng t o s peak concerning th e a sse s s me nt s of 28 0 0 We st Sa ratoga Avenu e . There was no respon se . * * * * * * * Mayor Ot is a s k e d if there wa s a ny o n e p r es (·nt wishing t o s peak c oncerning he a ssessments o f 290 0 West Sa r a toga Avenue. There was no re s ponse. * * * * * * * Ma y o r 0 is as ked if th er was anyo n e pres<'nt wish i ng 0 s p a k co n ce rn i ng th ass ssmen s of 3000 Wes S a n o r d Driv e . The r e was no r es po n se . * * * * • * * Mayor 0 is asked if here was anyon pres nt wishing 0 sp a concerning he a sse sm n s of 3100 w s t Stan ford Drive. There was no r spons . * * • • • • • Mayor Otis 1 f her w 0 sp ak cone rning th n s 0 There w no r s • * • • • • M ishing 0 p k cone Orlv I • March 28 , 1983 Page 8 There was no response. * .. .. .. • • • * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments of 2900 West Tanforan Drive. There was no response. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak concerni ng the assessments of 3000 West Tufts Avenue. There was no response. * * * * * * * Mayor Otis asked if there wa s anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments of 3100 We st Tufts Avenue. There was no response. • • * • * * • Mayor Otis asked if there was anyone present wishing to speak concerning the assessments of 3200 West Tufts Avenue. There was no response . * * * * * * .. Mayor Otis asked if ther e was anyone pres nt wishing to s peak c oncerning h e a s s e ssments o f 2800 Wes Union Avenue. There wa s no respons • * .. * • * • * M y o r 0 sp a cone r ning was no r espo n se . as k d if he r e was a ny one p r s n iah i ng o he ass ss en s of 2900 Wes Union Av enue . T ere • • • • • • Mayor 0 1 a d hi conclurt d he call tn •• .. .. • • .. Oirec o r d h w ul r spon 0 h wri en ro ats a n d p r o v id • o Cl t y Council . .. • • • • • Counc 1 " Ill al 8 r rivln on h a r e 0 • • • • • March 28 , 1983 Page 9 Denver recently, he appreciated the streets of Englewood for being in good shape . * * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEAR- ING. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: 8:30 p.m . Ayes: Nays: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis . None. The Mayor declared the motion carried. * * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Mayor Otis adjourned the meeting without a vote at I . - - P R 0 C L A M A T I 0 N WHEREAS, The annual sale of Buddy Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars has been officially recognized and endorsed by governmental leaders since 1922; and WHEREAS, V.F.W. Buddy Poppies are assembled by disabled veterans, and the proceeds of this worthy fund-raising campaign are used exclusively for the benefit of disabled and needy veterans and the widows and orphans of deceased veterans; and WHEREAS, The basic purpose of the annual sale of Buddy Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars is eloquently reflected in the desire to MHonor the Dead by Helping the Living". NOW , TH~REFQRg , I, EUGE E L. OTIS, Mayor of the City of Englewood, Colorado , hereby proclaim April 29, 3U and May 1, 1983 BUDD¥ POPP¥ DA¥5 in the City of Englewood, and I urge the citizens of this community to recognize the merits of this cause by contributing generously to its support through the purchase of Buddy Poppies on the day set side for th distribut on of these symbols of appreciation for the sacrifices of our honored dead. 1 urg 11 p triotic citizens to wear a Buddy Poppy as mute evidence of our grat tud to th m n of this country who have risked their lives n d fense of the freedoms which we continue to enjoy as Am rica citizens. GIV u d r my h nd nd a al thia 18th day of April, 1983. -------M y;y---------- ) C 0 U N C I L DATE Ma r ch 31 , 1 983 • • - C 0 M M U N I C A T I 0 N AGENDA ITEM SUB J ECT Name s As signe d t o Priva t e Stree t s o r Drives INITIATED BY City Planning and Zoning Commission ACT I ON PROPOSED Appr ove the requests t o identify private r oadways within twa unique resid e ntial pro jec ts by street names which reflec t the name of t he development. I TRODUCTlON: THE REQUEST. The City Planning and Zoning Co mmi ssi on h a s received r quests from the developers of t wo r sidential projects t o i denti fy th e pr i va t e roadways within their project s by names which are associated wi t h t heir development rather than by the standard street n mes. The requests re as follows: THE WATERFORD Th ori Th within they b Wa t erford , which , as ou know, is dev dev lop d by th L rwin Multi-f mily lopment was laid out und r a Subdivision that d v lopm nt w r no t d d i e l d to the City n ince L r win old th prop rty. loped on property Housin Corpor tion. nd th roadway ti , nor hav l • • • • Page 2 While The Waterford staff would like to rename the street at which the traffic signal is located on U.S. 285 from South Gilpin Street "Waterford Drive", they do not feel as strongly about that, because they realize that South Gilpin Street does extend to the south. The Planning Commission did recommend the change, however. The owners of The Waterford would purchase the street name signs which would identify Waterford Parkway and Waterford Drive and would work with the owners of Kimberly Woods and Kimberly Village to facilitate the change of address for those units. THE COTTONWOOD VILLAGE The Cottonwood Village development is located just north of West Quincy Avenue at approximately the Huron-Inca alley. There will be only two homes located in what should be a very quiet, elegant setting, and access to the homes will be off of West Quincy Avenue by way of a private drive. This drive was designated on the Plat as "an easement for utilities, private drive, and emergency vehicle access road". It will be constructed to City specifications. It will serve no other properties and is not an extension of any other stre t to th north or south. Initially it was assumed that these two homes wou ld be addre s d off of West Quincy Avenue; but now that construction is und rway, the own r would like to install a sign designating the entrance 8 Cottonw d Way and addressing the homes in th 4200 block series. The owners would pr id th atre t nam i n at their expense. BACKGROUND: • • • . . • Page 2 While The Waterford staff would like to rename the street at which the traffic signal is located on U.S. 285 from South Gilpin Street "Waterford Drive", they do not feel as strongly about that, because they realize that South Gilpin Street does extend to the south. The Planning Commission did recommend the change, however. The owners of The Waterford would purchase the street name signs which would identify Waterford Parkway and Waterford Drive and would work with the owners of Kimberly Woods and Kimberly Village to facilitate the change of address for those units. THE COTTONWOOD VILLAGE The Cottonwood Village development is located just north of West Quincy Avenue at approximately the Huron-Inca alley. There will be only two homes located in what should be a very quiet, elegant setting, and access to the homes will be off of West Quincy Avenue by way of a private drive. This drive was designated on the Plat as "an easement for utilities, private drive, and emergency vehicle access road". It will be constructed to City specifications. It will serve no other properties and is not an extension of any other street to the north or south. Initially it was assumed that these two homes would be addressed off of West Quincy Avenue; but now that construction is underway, the owner would like to install sign designating the entrance s Cottonwood Way and ddressing the hom s in the 4200 block s ries. Th owners would prdvid the street na sign at their expens • BACKGROUND: City of Engl wood and oth r citi a in the of the public str eta into conformance Th th t o ncy • -• • • ~~ Page 3 ~~ I • RECOMMENDATION: After having reviewed the requests made by the owners of The Waterford and Cottonwood Village , it was the opinion of the City Planning and Zoning Commission that if there is legal authority to do so, the requests should be granted. These are both unique developments and the circumstances differ from areas served by public streets. The action taken by the Planning Commission is as follows: 1 . The Waterford. Carson moved: Barbre seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that the following street name changes be approved within The Waterfo r d development: 1) East Girard Avenue and East Girard Place to be changed to Waterford Parkway. 2) South Gilpin Street at the point of entry off of U.S. 285 be changed to Waterford Drive. 2. COTTONWOOD VILLAGE. Carson moved: Becker seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council th prival roadway in Cottonwood Villag Subdivision be d signated as Cottonwood Way. AYES: Se nti, Steel, Tanguma, Venard, All n, Barbr , B cker, C rson NAYS: None ABSTAIN: McBrayer Th motion carried. SUG STED ACTION: VED tv ___________ _ D·------------------------ l NT _______________________________ __ _____ , I • • .. , • • - MEMO TO: Dorothy Romans, nss't Director of ··G.n. DATE: March 17, 19 83 RE: Changing Street Names I have researched your question to determine whether the City may permit the changing of the street names in the "Waterford Park". Currently two streets pass through there and are named consis tently with other Englewood streets. The Waterford management has reques ted to change street names. The public retains the right to use streets as public highways whether the ownership of those streets is in the City or private person. The City has broad power over the regulation of all manner of use of the streets. Included within this power is the authority: "To regulate the numbering of houses and lots and to name and change the name of any street or other public place." C.R.S. '73, 31-15-702(1) (a)VII. Englewood has enacted ordinances which are related to the above r-power. There is an ordinance which adopts a syslem of numb erinq which applies to Englewood streets. The ordinance basical ly provides for a uniform numbering system of all streets with in Englewood. See '69 E.M.C. 3-12-1. I • In addition, it is required that in approving a subdivision, th City Planning and Zoning Commission must consider the propos ed subdivision plan with due regard for the City street plan. '69 E.M.C. 12-2-31; '69 E.M.C. 12-3-3 4. It seems that within the above restrictions the City could cons nt to the renaming of the streets, if it so wished. I would be appropriate to m nd the subdivision plat or waiver which was approved for th Waterford, if it is de m d appropriate to chang at m a. Then th atr t name ch nge recomm nd tion coul d c:·~ orwarde to Council for their action purauan to the bov '-~ bb I • • • • March 8, 1983 Englewood Planning Commission and/or City Council Englewood, Colorado Ladies and Gentlemen: We rcprcsenL Lhc owner~> of '!'he WuLcrford devclopmenL und would u ppt eCJ.uLc you• consideration in allowing us to ren~me the private streets owned by us within this development. This letter confirms our ownership of all the pri vate streeLti as indicated on the attached plot by the red wavy line. Please consider our reasons for this request: 1 . We have experienced a great deal of confusion with deliver y p opJe an d cl i ents who do not understand the relationship of ~. Girar d Place unu Gilpin as they relate to the private development of th e Wat rforu. 2 . We reconunend that Waterford Drive and Waterford Parkway be u etl ~Hti Lt...t J. Waterford Drive would replace the present Gilpin entry and Waterford Parkway would replace the present E. Girard Ave., and Pla ce a& 1ndJ CUlc•l iu n :tl on the ploL. 3 . e feel that this would allow us a more consistent number i ng system lLh•ll our development and eliminate the public confusion now ex1 sl1ng . 4, We are continuing our efforts to create a magnificent 35 ac r e park to s upplement and enhance the parks already existing i n Eng le ood nd llt..•nt.. tl all th members of th coaununity. The name "Waterford Park y" would s erve to reinforce t his commitaoent to the Ci ty of Eng lewood . I f our plan s meet wi th your approval please b s aured that in r rd to our neigh bor s , Kim ber l y Wo ods nd Ki mberly Villag , w wi ll do Pve r ything to ci{e~l mo o th tran ition wi t h t he i r r e apectiv chang a of address . will contact th owne r ship of th se prop r ti s to dv ise them of th reason~ for lh1 c1~n~ nd ot! r our ssist nc s it b come s n ce r y . If th a propo t1on and plac 1 1a approv d will b nt of new 1 n , etc . r ny e x n incurr ed 1n th con tru - Th nk yo u for you r conaid r t1on. I • February 25, l98J Ms. Susan Powers Community Development City of Englewood )400 South Elati Street Englewood, Colorado 80110 Dear Susan: • • • IJI \i I 'I hll 'j I tlt.l I o•lt II lo q, /I old Ill We have recently purchased the Cottonwood Village subdivision and wish to name the street located on private property, within the subdivision "Cottonwood Lane". Additionally, we wan t to designate Lot 2 as "l Cottonwood Lane" and Lot J as "2 Cotton-wood Lane", We will take care of informing the Postal Department o f these designations if you wi l l notify the proper City Departments. We thank you so much for your help in this mat t er. S ino~ EM/j • • • • ---= NORTH t I . • I \'J ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1983- • • ,. • BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 1] INTRODUCED BY Council Member F ITZPATRICK AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE WHOLE COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE WITHIN PAVING DISTRICT NO. 28, IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO; APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE APPORTIONMENT OF SAID COST TO EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN SAID DISTRICT; ASSESSING A SHARE OF SAID COST AGAINST EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND; PRESCRIBING THE MANNER FOR THE COLLECTION AND PAYMENT OF SAID ASSESSMENTS; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 22, .Series of 1982, finally passed and adopted on May 19, 1982, the City Council has created Paving District No. 28, within the City of Englewood, for the purpose o£ constructing and installing street paving, curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements , together with necessary incidentals, on certain streets within the City; and WHEREAS, the improvements authorized by said Ordinance have been completed and accepted by the City and the whole cost of such improvements has been determined; and WHEREAS, an assessment roll has been prepared and a statement showing the total cost of the improvements has been duly filed with the City Council; and WHEREAS, from the statement made and filed with the City Council, it appears that the whole cost of said improve- ments is the amount of $491,086.87, of which amount the City of Englewood will pay $212,853.08 leaving $278,233.79 to be assess d against th real property within th District, said amount includ- ing costa of inap ction, coll ction and other incid ntala and also including interest aa allow d by law; and WHEREAS, from said tatem nt it also appears that the City Council has apportioned a share of th whole cost to each lot or tract of land within th District, in accordance with h -l • I . • • - benefits to be derived by said property and in the proportions and amounts severally set forth in Exhibit A attached to this Ordi- nance; ·BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. Confirmation of Assessment Roll. That the whole cost and apportionment of the same within the District is hereby approved and confirmed, and said apportionment is hereby declared to be in accordance with the special benefits which the property in the District will receive by reason of the construc- tion of said improvements, and a share of said cost is hereby assessed to and upon each lot or tract of land within the District in the proportions and amounts as set forth in the assessment roll, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. Payment of Assessments. That the assess- ments shall be due and payable at the office of the Director of Finance of the Clty of Englewood, within thirty days after the final publication of this Ordinance, without demand; provided that all such assessments may, at the election of the property owner, be paid in installments, with interest as hereinafter provided. Failure to pay the whole assessment within said period of thirty days shall be conclusively considered and held an election on the part of all persona interested, whether under disability or otherwise, to pay in said installments. Such el ction shall b conclusively held and considered as a waiver of any right to question the power or jurisdiction of th City to construct the improv menta, the quality of th work, th r gularity or auffici ncy of the proc ed- ln a , or th val dity or th corr ctneaa of the aaaea enta, or the val1dity of the li n th reo!. In th v nt of such 1 ction to pay n install- m.ents, th •• asm nta a hall b payable at th of fie of the County Treaaur r of Arapahoe County, Colorado in en ( 10) equal annu 1 inatallm nta of principal, the tirat of wh ch inatallmen a -2 • I . • • - of principal shall be due and payable on or before the 1st day of January, 1984, and the remainder of said installments shall be due and pyable successively on or before the 1st day of January, in each year thereafter until paid in full, with interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 12.50% per annum, com- mencing on the date of publication of this ordinance by title following final passage and payable each year at the time of paying installments of assessments. Section 3. Penalty for Default or Non-Payment. Failure to pay any installment, whether of principal or interest, when due shall cause the whole of the unpaid principal to become due and payable immediately, and the whole amount of the unpaid principal and accrued interest shall thereafter draw interest at the rate of one per centum (1%) per month, or fraction of a month, until the da t e of tax sale, a s provided b y law. At any time prior to the d ate of the tax s ale, the owner may pay the amount of all unpaid i n s ta l lments wi th i ntere st at one per centum ( 1%) per month, or fraction of a month, a nd all penalties accrued and shall thereupon be restored to the right thereafter to pay in installments in the s ame manner as if default had not been suffered. The owner of any property not in default as to any installment or payment may, a t a ny t i me, pay t he whole of the unpaid principal with accrued i n terest to the da te of the next assessment installment payment dat • Sec ion 4 . Discount o n Payment of Asse ssment s . Pay- ments may be mad to the Di re ctor o f F i nance at any time with in thirty days af er th final publica tion of this Ord i nanc , and an allowance of t v p r c nt (S ) w ill be mad on all pay nts made during such per od, but not thereaft r. The discount of S shall apply to all such payments, whether th pay ent is th entire mount of assess ent due, or a part of the aas ss nt. I m diat ly a ter the expiration of such thirty d ay p riod , th sseas nts shall b c rtif d to the County Treasurer or Arapaho County, Color do , tor collection, aa provid d by law. 3 - I • • • - Section 5. Assessment Lien. All assessments levied against the real property within the District, together with all interest thereon and penalties for default in payment thereof, and all costs in collecting the same, shall constitute, from the date of the final publication of this ordinance, a perpetual lien in the several amounts assessed against each lot or tract of land. Such lien shall have priority over all other liens except general tax liens, and shall be enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. If any tract of real property included within the District is hereafter divided or subdivided into two or more such tracts or parcels, the Director of Finance, with the assis- tance of the Director of Public Works, is hereby authorized and directed to divide the assessment against such tract in the same proportion that the tract itself is subdivided into two or more such parcels, and to certify the revised assessments to the County Treasurer of Arapahoe County, Colorado. Section 6. Payment of Special Assessment Bonds. The amount of assessments herein levied against the property specially benefited, in the total amount of $278,233.79, together with the proceeds of the bond issue and not needed for the construction of the improvements, if any, will be in an amount sufficient for th payment of the outstanding bonds previously issued for Paving District No. 28, dated August 1, 1982, in the principal amount of $472,600. Section 7. S verability. That if any one or mor sections or parts of this Ordinance shall be adjudged unenforce- able or inv lid, such judg nt shall not aff ct, impair or in- validate the r aining provisions of this Ordinanc , i b ing th ntention that the varioua provision• hereof are sev rable. S ction 8. E rg ncy Provision. By reason of the fac tpat bonds of Paving District No. 28 are now outatanding and tha 1nt rest ther on will ahortly b co du and payable, funda us b made available fro aaa as enta at the earlieat poaaible date or payment of auch in er at, nd for th i ediate pr - s rva ion o h public prop rty, h lth, p ac nd •• y, i ia - 4 • ) • -• • • h ereby declared that an emergency exists and that this Ordinance shall take effect upon its final passage. Section 9. Repealer. All ordinances, or parts thereof, i n conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 10. Hearing. In accordance with the City Ch arter and the Municipal Code of the City, the City Council shall ho ld a public hearing on this ordinance, before final passage at 7:30 P.M . o r at such la ter t i me on e i ther Apr i l 4 or 18, 1983, as Council is able to hear it in its normal course. Section 11. Publication and Effective Date. This Ordinance, after its final passage, shall be numbered and record- ed, and t he adopt i on and publication shall be authenticated by the sig na tu re of the May o r and the Director of Finance, ex-officio City Cl erk-Treasurer, and by the Cert i ficate of Publication. This ord i nance shall take effect immediately upon final passage and s hall be published within seven days thereof. Introduced , read in full and passed on first reading on the 22nd day of February, 1983. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 23rd day of February, 1983 . R ad by title nd pass d on fin 1 reading on the 18th day of April , 1983. Publish d by title a Ordin nc No.~~----' s ries of 1983, on th 20th d y of _.:.:A:J::p.:.r.:.i.:.l __ , 1983. Eug n L. Ot1a, yor A at: X otficio C{ -5- • I • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood , Colorado, hereby certify that the foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. Series of 1983. Gary R. HJ.gbee -6- • ) I • • 6 ~ 9 10 II j II 13 I !A I ., •• 1971 34 l 00 001 llofcldl, i.J..nda ,J. 2702 5. LOgan ~t. e nglewood, co 80110 1971 34 l 00 002 Udvardy, 3os~ r. ' r.li~aboth , Jt Ten 2714 5 . Logan St. C ngl.:~·oocl, co 80ll0 1971 H l 00 004 Jackson, ,'1ory r . 29 98 C. Logan St. englewood, CO 00110 1971 34 l 05 001 llt.~~M•, WilliAm 14. ' Uilliard, Ehie T., Ten 2720 s. Loq .. n St. Cnglowood, CO 80110 1971 34 . 1 . 05 002 hnder~on, Ward A. ' i'Wlley, Donn Paul 2730 s . Logan St. l:n alewoocl, co 10110 1971 l4 l 05 OOJ 8re1t, ~etner1ne "· 27 4;) s. Logan St. cnq1ewood, co 10110 1971 )4 l 0$ 004 O~ttertleld, Helv~n 10145 ~IOrruon Ad . Oe!!vor, CO 10227 1971 l4 1 0~ oos Say ra, Henry C. 2752 s. Lo9an St . Ln91 ood, co 80110 1971 34 1 ;)$ 00~ \:ocl'on, Char1•• a::. • '13 ry I.Oviae, Jt Ton !7',6 s. ~~n ~. 1.h\l (f . co o0110 lwl 81otlr. l, 2 Jt 3, 4 5, 6 l D. l • • • cor..m . .!C N\J l:\J t". 01 r l~ vL ~L : 1a of ti\!C. 3~-4-u ~; ~ll. c o n N l1n~ o( Sd. Sec. 148!='t.. to.Jl'l..: T h. !.i ._,l llt./.\nq. 110 l't .. LV y P l .; 'l'n. \1 "t 1~1.../ Ang. 14 8 Ft. to a Pt. on W lane of E ~ of ~E ~~ 1·h. ;~ 1\lg. 5cl. W lana 130 Ft. to Pt. of Beg. • \ V•c. a llo:t 1\<lJ., l:x. nds. Con""· at a Pt. 130 r·t. s of sw Co r . of c ~ of ~c ~ of 5c>c. 34-4-68; Th. C 148 Pt.: Th. 5 SO ft.; Th. H l4d l ·t.; Th . ~50 Ft. to Bttg. " •t Vac . alley .~dJ ., Ex. ndn. 34-4-68 Doq. 690 t•L. N • 30 l'L. C of SW Cor. o! S > of ~ \ o! NE ~ o! sac. 34- 4-68 : Th. N 36 Pt.; Th. C lll l't .: Th. 5 36 l't.: Th. li 133 Pt. to lleCJ., ex. E 8 Pt. alley Cat.rona Sub. ,, C.tzOAa S@. ,, Catr011a sw.. ,. SOn9a r a Sub. ot Plot l Yale 11111 ' 'I \'a c. allay Ad). (27U s. Lo9"n St. l .. on •• s ... ot Plot l Yale Hlll ' ~ Vac:. alley A.cS). Sonc;or a Sub. l'lot 2 v .. l ., 11111 ' •, Vac. allry t\dJ. • $3,337.95 $1,704.34 $566.20 $1,002.68 ) $1,020.67 $828.53 $846.62 $938.59 $756.17 I • • . I • • • • ••· ., .. of 1r~t <l "''"..._.;~''' \Jt V• Ol~IUPI ION 0t I'MIJPlM I 'f' +l AV lN C. 10 II NAME ANO AODaU$ 1~71 34 1 J> 007 Pan9e11, Rlchard J. 2760 3. ~9~n St. Cnglc~ood, co 90110 1971 34 1 05 008 Forstcdt, M. Wilma 2762 s. Logan St. englewood, co 80 110 1~71 34 1 05 009 Johnson , evelyn L. & ~1orr1s, JullAnnc, Jt Ten 276G 5. Logan St. t:nq1cwoo<l, CO ~0110 1971 34 1 06 011 19-10 flcl<elvoy, John R. ' 22 Loretta, Jt Ten 2791 5. Logftn St. f.nglc>/Ood, CO 80110 1971 34 l ()G 012 17, 10 llerold , Jullus C. l8 ~761 s. Log~n St. Cng1owood, CO 80110 1?71 34 1 JG 013 !lorton, John P. ' Florence c., Jt Ten 2757 s. Logan St. engle~~. co 80110 1?71 H 1 06 014 UQuc r, V~ncent J. ' carolyn L., Jt. Ten. 2751 s. Lo9en St. ~nglewood, CO 80110 1?7 1 34 1 06 015 hdministrator ot Vota. htt a~:• \\lta 1\d::lr. Dldg. Waa~n9tin, D.C. 20420 15, 16 12- H 1971 34 l 06 016 Preatite ~okerate Aaao- c:iatee, Inc. 10 10 2741 s. Lotan St. tn9levood, co 10110 U7l H 1 06 017 Bodley, Plorence x. ' P~Hnor, lert A ., Jt -:-.n 20, I N 'I 21 2731 5. Lotan St. tntl o4, CO 10110 lt71 34 1 06 011 hleld•, a chard v. u nu 1 . Loten st. u. I u r::n lowood, co 10110 111 • 1 06 0 ' .l~od. Oanie1 T. l 1• Oll11 r.. , J t T•n 2721 I. Lo9a11 S~. U•Ql.: , CO 10110 I I • 16, 17 $\JGOIVI$10N ~ 50 Ft. of \~ lJJ ~t. uf !'lot 3, Y.Jlu llill ~ 50 Ft. of s 10~ Ft. of H lJJ Ft. oi Plot J, Yale lilll .. s so rt. of w 158 rt. Dllc 3, ~Ill~ lilll ,. , nnanJalc II hnna.nd&alc ,, Annandale ,, Annandale II s 40 Pt. ot Linvale St., vacated, 1y~nt between w 11114 of s Lovan St. • E line of alley between s COrant • S Lotan St. • .Adj. Lot 12. Slk . 10 , -ADIIAn4Ale (27 45 s . Lotan lt.) II S~ Of 21, all 22 6 X 10 Pt. of Linvale St., ,._ vacated, Ad j. Lot 22, Ilk. I, A.nnan4ale .. fl Annandale 1/ 11nnant1ale 12117 s. r.ooan 5t.) • $846.62 $756.17 $756.17 $1,512.34 $756.17 $1,117.87 $1,233.75 $695.38 $1,528.76 $592.75 $821.00 $l,57l.ii • ~ ) I • I ) • • • Of.SCRtPIION Of lo'MOPtll'l' -----. --.~·-·- NAME AND AODflf~ lot eu .... l SUtotYI::.IC.llol 1971 34 1 Ou 010 14, " Annandalu Houck, Bill .J. 'l'erry, l~ (2709 S. L<l~~n :;t,) Dougl.1s !1. 8592 E. Br1arwoud Ulvd. ~ny1ewood, CO 8011< 1971 34 1 06 Q21 1<, Annandald Bailey, Lou>ac ' Seork, 13 Tami Sh i rlee ' :1 arks , Pe:r~lynne 2703 S. Logan St. Englewood, CO 30110 197l 34 l 15 013 25, ~ubere, Dale L. ' Lee 26 I:., .Jt Ten 3Q97 s. Logan St. englewood, CO ROllO 1971 34 1 1~ OlJ 27, Norton, Robert J. • 28 Audrey£,, Jt Ten 3087 s. Logan St. englewood, co 80110 1971 34 1 15 01~ 29, Knede, Juoe M. • :~yrna 30 Stray~r~ bawy. Hts. Stray\!ns uowy . 11\..t.t. .. Str4ycra Bdwy . lltlii. 6 L., Jt Ton 9 10 11 12 ... •• 3077 s. Logan St. englewood, co 80110 1971 34 1 1s n6 31, Carbor, orville L. ' 32 ouita M., Jt Ten 3067 S. Lo9An St. P.nglewood, CO 80110 1971 34 l 15 017 33, 5 ~t•t!un, OOlorea K. 34 74~3 s, Wellin9ton St. L1ttleton, CO 10122 lt7l 34 1 15 011 35, s Jonea, J. w. • MAry 36 3029 s. Logan St. Cn9lewood, co 10110 1971 34 1 lS 019 37, S SIUth, CVOI\ n. ' .. tty )I L •• Jt ..-en 6114 S. Cherry St. Littleton, CO 10122 1971 34 l lS 020 39, S Ullrich, Irene 4) 3021 S, Lot&n St. Cn9l Wood, CO 00110 ltll 34 l ou Pratt, 1~r9arat c. )01 1 . Lo9•n lt. tlewood, co lOll) 971 34 l 5 , ROehl r, Arth r o. • Cllle K., Jt T n lOIS LOgan S\. Cnt • d. 0 10110 un H 1 u o J per~•. Cr a ce P. ' lt ltt naon, ~ t lla • 1 ne, G. J ., J \ 7 11 l?Ol G. ~a l • .;n • co 10 41, s u u. ~ 4 " Strayora Bdwy. Uta. II ;;trayora Ddwy. llta. (3031 ,S. L~·n ~\.) , Strayara Bdwy. Hta. II ltrayera ldwy . Hta. 13025 s. Lotan St. ) " Strayer• Dc.wy . Hta. ol Streyere Ddwy, Ht•. " Strayer• 8d I· t ta. II StU)' re $1,279.25 $846.63 $787.11 $1,007.35 $787.11 $787.11 $787.11 $991.16 $1,229.82 $899.06 $1,252.25 $1,0 n.o .20 I • • • • ......... •·I •• I ", ·~ ~ Ol ~lf ll 'lo viJ V I I'W.()I 'lW.I\' ----·· NAME AND AD06tff»S l ol 01\K~ )U01)11/i$ll,))''o 1 971 H 1 l~ JH 41, ,..;L! JYI.!L'S I.SO \ooy . li t$. Butz, LellO[ . J OSI.![>h l nu 4d $787.11 4 F ., Jt ":'t!n 3001 s . LOgan St. l:::ngle..,·ood, co 80110 1971 34 l lb 001 1 -'l'lh. l rJ.bOUt"f1S li..! l. 1st $1,990.29 Van Ste 1 ten, John J. • flg. ~ oori& G., Jt Ten 3008 s. Logan St . Z:nglcwood, co 80110 1971 34 1 16 00 2 ~. Tln. F'r1.bourc;t~ DeL lst $1,101.19 Lyr.lan, ::>uan c /\, . "· Flg. Patr1Cl4 A ., Jt 'l'cn :~ b I 3012 s. LOoan St . 7 englewood, co 80110 1971 H 1 16 JO 3 s 19 F t. LOt 7. all of a. $811.74 Penn, LOU 1S8 1.. Tlh . Fribourga Bel. lst 3016 s. LOgan St. F1g. englewood, co 80110 1971 34 1 16 004 ~. Tlh. r ·r1bourqs nci. 1st $1,086.79 !'lades, Leo 1~. ~ llOborah 10 Flg. • !.., Jt Ten ~ 3018 s. LOgan St . ~ englewood, co 80110 1971 34 l 16 005 1 1 , l Tlh. Fribourqa Bal. !at ' Otia, JAmoa £. ' 12 Flg. i J~nne L ., Jt Ten $1,406.53 I 30 20 s. Loqan st. englewood, co 80110 1971 34 1 16 006 :J, 2 Tlh. Fr1.bourqs llcl. lat $1,034.88 Knox, Dav id H. ' V~cki 14 Flg. L.' Jt Ten 3052 s . Logan St. t;nglowood, co 80110 1971 34 1 16 007 1~, 2 Tlh. ?r ~ourga Bel. lal. $804.81 0'1\tH11y, 14icMel J. ' 16 Flg . DJ.DOC M., .It Ton 3060 s. Logan St . I~Yt"~~·l~oo:0110 17, 2 Tlb. rr itlo1U'9• ae1 . lat $1,141.33 Webb, ooyle w. ' Linda 11 nv. (lOU I. Loq&ll St.) ' L ., Jt. To n 401 Lookout Viow Dr. Golden, co 10401 1971 l4 1 l6 009 19, 2 Tlh. Fritlo1U'9a ae1 . lat $875.60 Bag lay, John T. 20 Fl9. 10 lOH S. Logan St. £nvlewood, co 10110 un H 1 16 010 21, 2 Tlh. !'r~tlo.a-gl ae1. lat $787.11 Colhna, ~rilyn L. 22 Flg. II 3014 s . Loga n St. Englewood , co 10110 1971 l4 1 16 ou 23 , 2 Tlh. Fr i tlour91 Del . lit $787 .ll Mc Kay, Clark /\. ' 24 1'19- It Fr a n c e a L., J' Ta n lOU S. Lotan l t . tnl)l ' co llll:l UH H 1 2 001 1-Ark al • /\deS . to Cng. $1,179.60 • ceonna ll, C:a l \'a c. a-Ft . alley Ad ). \~ 9:12 s. l.ocJan St. Cn~1 owood , co tO 10 ltH 3• 1 002 . ' • \'a c • •-r t . a hi/ lieS ). $786.40 K1n9, J OHP v •• J r . ' ' ' :'1 1 n. of t't ot Lot I • Carolyn lt ., Jt Te n '• Arkllll Ad t o r:r.~. 2?10 s. Logan I n 0\'ood , co 1)11:1 I • • 1l • • • • - 1\.:,1 '•:-Ml l\il \1\IIUIAIIU N I''" ,,, .... , 01u •~"" ...... ~'"''"' .. ul.CI ,JIIIII•• ~AV INC OUCIIPTION Of I'WO .. tlllY J NAME AND AOOAESS 1971 34 1 22 003 G, Sla ttory, Anthon'/ L. t. 7 :-1ac.tclino i!920 S. LO'!•ill :JL. ~ng lewood, co oull~ 1971 34 1 22 oo4 a- Bng1ish, Stephen ~. 10 2934 S. LOqan St. ~nqlewood, CO BOll~ 1971 )4 1 22 005 11. K1rach, Robert Jeffrey 1~ ' Cook, Donna Lynn 2940 s. Loaan 5 ~. englewood, 'co 90110 1971 34 1 22 006 Richardson, Sally S. 3195 s. Bella1rc St. Denver, CO 30110 1971 34 l 22 007 :~Pherson, John R. 420 Briarwood Ft. Collins, CO 80521 1971 34 1 23 014 Traynor, I. J. ' Claudia F., Jt Ten 3381 S, Clarkson St. tnqlawood, CO 80110 1971 34 1 23 015 Phan9~t.trD, Sombut AAporn. Jt Ton ' VlbUldhAm, Pr&~Ot 2985 s. LOgan St. ~nqlowood, co 80110 25-4 28, 4 )0, 11~-34 l 23 016 Povich, Gary a. ' '•u1a,ll ' . Jt Ten :U75 s. 1J:>9&n St. Enqlevood. co 10110 1971 )4 1 l3 017 3 • Stevena, Co1l .. n J. ' )) 10 Sua~• c., Jt Tan 296~ s. LOVan St. ~~t~~·2 ~o 01 :o110 Guaranty Invas~nt co. II c/O !Iebert ~lcDO~J9al 232 w. llth Avo . Denver, CO 10204 lt71 )4 1 23 019 t.ovo, Kenneth A. c/o R. Oslo G&toa U~l S. 1J:>9An St. cnqlawoocl, co lOUD 1971 34 1 ll 020 )7. K&laVlk, CathY 31 4301 s. annoek St. n<;l• d, Cl> ~011, 1171 34 ) ~ 1 ) f avor, J 1 tdw. 4) u 1?3~ s. Lo9•'" St. •• li 1 00<1. co 10110 • ~VUUoV l S.h.)N ~ Vac . 9-rl. alh:y 1\J ·,. L:::r:. :1 l Ft. I)! L;11 o( Lu\.. 6 , ~rkal!s Aod. LO Cng. • Va c. S-Ft. alleyAd1·• Arkel1s Add. to ~ng. ., Vac. ti-F~. ull~Y ~'d J., Arkells ~d~. to t~g. ~ 60 Ft. of LOt 1, D1k. 1, wr1ght Add. (2990 s. LOqan St.) 5 1~ rt... uL LOt 1. all LOt 2, Blk. 1, Wrlght Add. (2996 s. LOgan St.) Strayers Bdwy. Kta. (2995 s. Loqan St.) .. Strayers Bdwy. Kts. Stra yers lldwy. lit&. II Strayers lldwy. Hts. 51, of t.ot 35, &1 of 34. Sl 4, Strayer& ldwy. Kt&. (2957 s. Logan St.) .. t.ot 36 ' M\ of 35, au ... 4, Strayers ~wy . Hts. ( Z.'5' ~ L~~~G~~N) Stray rl wy. Ht&. l.H5 :;.. .:~O:.flto~) Stl a)'OC S ld"'Y • l·~· $786.40 $786.40 $1,179.60 $943.68 $1,122.17 $1,179.60 $786.40 $976.29 $786.40 $680.26 848.19 $7 .40 $786.40 I • • • • .. • &;;;;:;o;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;o ....... = ... ..;.--.-.. ___________________________ ~;;:;.x,"S;MlN'i"i.J\l\.ULAII~;;;-IV" 10 II ~ 12 I ) D 14 ' 15 ) ,. I • DE.KIIPth.>N Of PIOPtiTY NAMt AND ADDU$$ lol iilod. 1971 34 1 2J 022 H , 4 ~h.k ll.Ch, LOul.S r. ' 4 2 Scherer, ~ary ~1., Jt 'l'cn 2933 S. Logan St. Englewood, CO 30110 1971 34 l 23 023 43, t4arcum, Thomas James io 44 Cheri Ann, Jt Ten 2931 s. Logan St. Englewood, CO 80110 1971 34 1 23 024 45, Pace, Donald J. • Ruby 46 a., Jt Ten 2911 s. Logan St. tn9le•:ood, CO 80110 1971 )4 l 23 025 47, Eckert , Fay A. 40 18001·ll3th Ave. S.E. Ronton Iii\ 98055 1971 34 1 29 013 13, Rich, llar~l:.m JJ. ' 14 Albert l\. , Jt ·ren 5268 s. Crant St. Littleton, CO 80121 1971 34 l 29 014 1~. Kurd, Stephen 'Hetcal!,l6 Patrlc~a D., Jt Ten 2877 s. Logan St. Cnqlewood, CO 80110 1,71 34 1 29 01~ 17, Cotter, Theda c. 18 2875 s. Logan St. ~nv1ewood, co 10110 1n1 34 1 29 ou Dcoaon, Klchao1 R. ' A lev 2871 S. Logon St. tng1ewoo4, CO 10110 1911 34 l 29 017 N.o.a. Aaaociatea 3441 s. Lincoln St. l:ng1ewoo4, co 10110 1971 )4 1 29 011 Corbltt, Dan K. ' S>1burn, Mona, Jt Ten 2155 S. Lotan St. En91 ewoo4, CO 10110 1971 )4 1 2t 019 Corbltt, Dan M. ' S1lburn, Mona, Jt Ten 2155 s. Lotan St. tn9laWOOd. co 10110 1971 l4 1 29 020 '· c. Velaa a. 21ll 1. Lo9•n St. nvlo • co lOll~ lt7l )4 1 29 021 Cravea, Jtan~a D. 1:, s . Lovan t . l:n91 • co 10110 UH H 1 9 Oll Audec, Wllli .. D. fl9n .. c .. Jt Ton I l Loi:MJan Sl. ln I • co 10 19, 20 21, 22 23, 24 l3 4- u l1, I u. ~0 4 4 1 1 tit..l.u'(o.!CS Uc.:""Y• l!t&. 5 t.rayer s Sd '·"Y. :!ts. Strayers Ddwy. J:ts. Strayers Bdwy. Hta. (2901 s . Logan St.) Kllll.Ct& Sub ., H.uli. O( 5/8 (2391 s . Logan St.) K~llua Sub., lwa. 5/U Klll~oa Sub ., Roa. ~/0 Xi11~ea Sub., Rea. 5/8 xi~iea •t.·, Rea) 5/1 (ol $. "?~" ~. ltill a a lub •• Ilea. 5/1 ~1haa Sub., Rea. 5/1 1111hea SuD., A ... S/1 llua Sub., Rea. 5/1 111aa S\lb., Aea. /'J I'AY I NG $786.40 $786.40 $786.40 $889.31 $769.61 $1,365.78 $1,027.09 $791.45 $79l.45 $791.45 $487.67 $1,181.11 $791.45 f7 l.45 ) I • • - • • lll .. l..lo<ol lh •1 -' ,,, i ~''' 1 .. IY lut Dl""'~ 1971 34 1 2~ U2 J ~I • I J:.l. ll.l.\..!!1 SuL., .:"'"· >/d $791.45 l L.inll, oav.1.d A . • ~2 KAthryn L., Jt Ten 2811 s. LOgan St. :I ~n~:Jl-.!WO_?Y, co aollo 1971 34 l 29 OH ~ J . I "~ ll ll..'b •.:uU., IIC'S. 5/ ~ Katzcnmcyer, Dalu L. • .:4 Tar.>lC Linda ! I 2801 s. Lcyan St. englewood, co aono 1971 J4 l 30 on Nl, of II~ of Plol 4. y,) liJ Stone.:~, Vernon L . lo 11111 (2 800 5. LOt;i.IO S t .) $769.61 $1,855.73 Reba /\., Jt Tt!n 1311 s. Ammons St. Lllkewood, co 8J215 1971 H 1 30 ou2 SL4 o! w 13J !'\... IIJ k. 4 Kloewur, R1chard fl. • ¥ale 11111 1\llCO II. , Jt Ten (2820 s. Logan SL.) $2,157.23 4990 s. Elatl St. englewood, co 80110 1971 34 l JO 003 1.:~ or N•, of Plut ~. Z<l ylcr, \o14YHtJ Kc1.th " ¥ale 11111 $2,730.38 norl>o:~ra JD.nc, Jt Ten ~824 s . Logan St. Englewood , co 00110 1971 34 l 30 004 w~ of s~ of Plot 5, Andrackl, Bcrn&ard F. ' ¥ale II ill $2,510.06 Ctlrlo.:an A., Jt ':'en 2830 s. Loqan St. englewood, co 80110 1971 34 1 30 005 W 171 Ft. of N~ of Plot Caloxy, Inc . 6, Yale H1ll uS~ M4rl.poaa St. (2840 s. Legan St.) $2,317.86 oonvor, co 80204 1971 H 1 30 006 W 133 Ft. of s" Bll<. 1\, RlchorcS.on, 1/illia• Yale Hill $2,317.86 Coor<,~o ' 1'atr1cia Ann , Jl. Ten ,, 2848 s. Lc<,~an St. Cn;lewood, co 80110 9 ,. U7l 34 1 Ji) 007 l J.o9&nh\lr&t, J:x. r: • Ft. $822.76 Nevbold, •• Gayle 10 2860 s. Legan St. Cn9lovood, co 10110 l 1911 34 l 30 008 2 1..09&nh1U"at, tx. t I Ft. !Uno••· J .... c. ' II !'l&r il)'ll 2170 s. Loqen St. i Enolevood, co 10110 U71 )4 1 30 009 t.ooanhuret, ex. elley 12 trl•, bnnet.b v. ' Thce .. u 11 •• Jt 'l'en $791.45 915.9 liiO S. l.o9an St.. J.nolewood, co 10110 Ul )4 1 lll ~10 1..09~nhure~ L.loat n, c. Dten • I no •· !..09An Itt.) 77.05 u ,;&&n A • .,. .... 1\Ma t.. Lltt.l<'~~n. co S0l23 :on ) ~ 12 002 I. t::n 1 ood llt.<l · 7 3.7 rd. tuvo~ne c. ' Mec y l "· Jt 'l'on )6 •• 1\c:a.e St. In 1•>1004. co 10110 I • ' •• • • • • I o II 0 1 ·1 0' "' .. ~ Ht o "' I ~ ·~ ,• 0l)CWII'fluN ut r'IW~t.WI Y t'AV I N\.1 ----·------· ,. NAME AND AOOIIU$ ... Ill ~~· iUIU)IVIS:ON 2077 03 2 12 1)03 j . L.:ngh:wuoJ Itt~. $743.79 Shank, lleu lilh ' GrJ.ppc, ~ Jil~s n., Jt Tcr. 3606 S . Acoma Sl. Eng l ewood, co 801 J 0 i 2077 03 ~ 12 004 r,, f.nglewood !Its. $743.79 Greer, Harv1n J. & Peggy J. 3612 S. Acoma Se. Englewood, co 80110 2077 03 2 12 00~ 7, Englewood IllS. $1,133.77 TruJi1lo, Carol J. 8 3616 S. Acoma St. Englewood, co 80110 2077 OJ 2 12 006 1 -liet.m 6o Kllllos Udwy. Jl t~. $2,351.44 Caaaon, Clctua A. ' 6 (3666 s. Acoma St.) Dorothy Jean SS9 0 S. Crestbrook Or. ~1 orr.Lson, co 80465 2077 03 2 1~ 007 7 . llam .. KlllJ.ua Wwy. IJt~. $743.79 C lAr~. JA~a Pranc•• 8 5 369 4 s. Acoma St. Englewood, co 80110 2077 OJ 2 13 008 9-HAml.lton & KlllUS Bdwy. $1,843.31 Iaaanual tvengal•ca1 12 Hta. 6 Lutheran 3695 S. ACOIIIA I:ng1awood, co 80110 2077 OJ 2 13 009 13, 2 H.1m ' K1111aa Odwy . Uta. $1,002.44 llcC11l, Ken B. ' 14 Ch.lr1eno w., Jt Ten 3669 s. Acoma St. englewood, co 80110 2077 03 2 1 3 010 1 5, Hem ' Killiaa Bdwy. Hta. $950 .25 Canach, uonry c. ... 16 c t al. 3GG7 S. AcOINl l!nglewoo4, co 80110 2077 03 2 13 011 '· 2 Englewood llta. $728.16 We4eraki, Alvin t. • 10 9 Kathleen 3617 s . Acoma Englewood, co IOUO .. 2077 03 2 13 012 11, 2 Englewood IIU . $743.79 IIAn at.er, Ph l p HerllertU 10 • Gertr""e, Jt Ten 3615 s. Ac.-. Cntlewood, co 10110 2077 03 2 13 013 13, & S 5 Pt. of 15, $818.18 11 Ann e , Michael Pre4ericlt 14 Englewood Hta . ' .Uuon, Jt Ten 3605 '· AcOINl lt . ~lewood, co 10110 /1 7 03 2 ll 014 l6 2 6 N 2, Pt . of 15, $1,123.31 JCIUl ren, 11111004 .1. ' £ntlewood HU. 12 C:ren, H ard J . ' (3601 1. Acaae lt.l .... II . C • llS Clenc:oe i t . Den.wr, co 102H u on 01 ~ Oll 5. lhaa .I ""•· $ . l Alley, Hllllel't !le4 ' 26 I •• JA AHc:e, Jt T n • n 1 a. Acoou lt. I ntl OOCl , co 0110 , IJ •• • l 9 10 11 12 1. 15 •• .. NAM( AND AUOII(~) """' B l ._.~~ lU11 OJ l l~ 014 Uc1.ng.1rdt, W~n clcl :1a~ 3785 S. Acoma ~t . ~ng lcwood, CO OUllO ~077 03 2 .!6 Ul:> l 'J Keough, Francis J., Jr. & Ruth 11., Jt Ten 3115 s. Bannock St. englewood, co 80110 2077 03 '-26 016 30 11organ, Roy K. " l1D.X10C tl., Jt 'l'Cn 3779 s. Acoma St. Englewood, CO 80110 2077 03 J lL 011 31. B>nkley, R>chard K. ' 32 Hildred, Jt Ten 3765 S. Acoma St. englewood, co 80110 2 077 03 7. 26 018 1), t1itcholl, Wuyno 8. 34 3757 S. Acoma St. englewood, co ~0110 2077 03 2 26 1)19 35, Pucciaroll•, M1chae1 A. 36 'Son1a L., Jt Ten 3739 s. Acoma St. Englewood, CO 80110 2077 03 2 26 020 37, 1 Lowu, Wayne A. 38 3735 s. Acoma St. englewood, CO 80110 2077 03 2 26 021 39, 7 Crimm, Lanning D. ' 40 .Jackson, Carol L., Jt T\o!n 37)1 s. Ac:oaa St. englewood, co 10110 2077 03 2 26 022 41, 7 Cray, Aabert E. ' Olga 42 R., Jt Ton 3725 s. Ac:ou St. Cnglewood, CO 10110 2077 03 2 26 023 4 3, 7 Sh1p.an, Philipp1ne O. 44 3717 s. 1\eoaa St. englewood, co 10110 2011 01 2 l6 026 u-1 1 u.l Evange1 1C&l 41 Lutheran Congrogation, Tho 3701 S, Ac St. LngleVOOd, CO 10110 2071 0) 27 0 Sc aling, &u110 P. 37 00 •• Aco.a $t. engle , co 10110 .. 2 I • • - ll.:u:, • t\t lll....:s UJwy. !&Lb . il ..sm • K!lll c~ !Jcl"""Y· illli. (37 83 S. Acoma St.) 1:am " ra111cs Bdwy. llt.s. llUI':l • i\.l.lli.l.!a Udwy . II \.&. llam ~ t\J JlJl.,.H flU wy. IlLS. " Ham • Kl1hoa Bdwy . llta. HAm • K1ll1ea Ddvy. Hta. " llaa ' Killiea Bdvy. Hta. .. 11&8 ' IUlUee advy. HU. .. 11&8 ' !Ulll.el advy. HU. I toa ' l~llle a 14vy. •' Ha a• l.ldvy. lltl. • I'A V IN v $1,076.80 $457.92 $369.43 $827.33 $738.84 $738.84 $758.66 $897.77 ) $738.84 $738.84 $1,477.& $73 • I • • 6 9 ~ ;I r 10 • 1 11 12 t ! ll 14 IS ,. NAME ANO ADUlt~ 2017 03 2 J1 002 :- Foster, John ~1., Jr. t. Mc1 ur i nc A ., J t 'l'cn 3706 s. Acomu St. ~nglowood, CO 00110 2077 03 2 27 005 fttark, Marguerite A . 3742 s. Acoma St. Englewood, CO 80110 2017 03 2 27 006 Fltzgcrald, Dani el M. ' Slckletitecl, Donna Jt Ten 3750 s. Acoma SL . ~nglcwood, CO 80110 2077 OJ 2 27 007 llodrJck, tdward r~. ' M1.ldrod 0 ., Jt ·ren 3760 s. AcomA St. ~n9lewooc:1, co 80110 2077 03 2 27 008 Ineornational Art Pro- jects, Inc. 2 04 9 Can tury Park Eaat, 12060 LOS An<jcles, CA 90067 2077 OJ 2 27 009 •to son, Davie:! 11. ' Valerie LYftA, Jt Ten 3776 s. &coac st. ~n91owood, CO 10110 2077 OJ .2 27 010 rurc:loson, Leon t:. ' varnet 1., Jt Ten 5941 5. Spotswood St. Littleton, co 10120 2071 OJ 2 27 011 Curry, rur9aret 3792 s. Aca.a &t. tn9lewood, co 10110 2077 OJ 2 27 022 Dockor, Kenneth c. • Barbara J . 721S s. Mevport way ~oY}e~.2~oo~0112 Fisk, Jnaanor t.. 3100 s. Acoaa St. nqlowood, CO 10110 2on OJ 2 n oo2 Moody, flay A. ' Doborah J., Jt Ton 30 21 s. Clarkeon St. t:n9lowooc:l, CO 10110 2077 OJ ~ I 003 Tavaner, Jolin C. ' Chriata P., Jt Tan 7210 s. h r n lt. l.lttlotun, CO IOl U 11, 12 13' 14 1~. 16 17, l8 8 l9,. 8 20 21, 8 22 23, 8 24 6-8 10 1,2 9 ), • 9 s,v • • • PAV I N 1..t $U&IJIVISl iJN il.lm ' KlllJ.cS Udwy. ll tl:t . $1,108.27 .i $768.99 lldm o Kll1lCS Bdwy. llts. $919.29 114m "' KilllC8 Udwy. liLa . $738.84 uam" Killiea Bdwy. uu. $738.84 13761 s. Aca.A St.) IIAa ' Ki111A• llchry. Hts. $921.26 liall ' Killi .. lldwy. IIU. $1,098.11 13716 s. Ac ... St.) llaa ' IU.ll.ie• lldwy. Hta •. $790.39 II H-' Kil U.ea 114wy • IIU. $2,061.38 IJ7U s. Ac ... St.) II .. ' Klllies ldvy. llts. $742.56 1-' K1lhes lldwy . uu . $742.5 13110 S. Aca.A St.) ... • Kllho• o.Jwy. uu . $742.56 13114 s. AC:OIII& St. I I • • • • • -------~-- I 1 f. I ~I il tl ~ I I l-.,1 lllod. 2011 OJ 2 ~a o~• Whitted, llonry ~lLhcl ~ C lar i ce o., Jt. ·rcn J024 s . Aco ma St. [;nqlcwoort, CO 80110 2 077 OJ 2 Jij 005 Englewood ~lathod lSt Church, The 3085 s . Broadway Englewood, CO ROl lO 2077 03 2 28 006 10-q CngleWOOd ~IO thO d lSt. 12 Church, The 3885 S . Broadwa y englewood, co 80 110 2077 03 2 28 Jl 7 Englewood ~tetho d at 12 Ch urch , The 3- 3885 s. Broadway 1 ~ Cnqlcwood, CO 8 0 1 1 0 2077 Ol ~ 2') 01~ 13, fHchardson, Leo n D. • 1 4 t nu NadJ.no , .Jt •rcn 3895 s. Acoma St. englewood. co 8011 0 2077 Ol 2 2 9 Oll 1~. l Byrno, Euge ne J. ~ Yayo 16 H.,Jt':'en 3800 s. Li ncoln St . englewood, co 80110 2077 Ol 2 2 9 014 17, l Pallller, IUrtha 11 . 18 3875 S. ACOmA St . tn9lawood, co 8 0110 2077 03 2 29 01 5 Con nullay, Truc11a M. l"~ S. AeoaiA St. En9lcwood, CO 10110 2077 Ol 2 U 016 North, JOhn R. ' 9 liOrt.h& Mae, Jt Ten )157 s. Aco .. St. tnvlawood, co 10110 2077 Ol 2 2t 017 'I'O•lln, Daley v. lO 3151 I. Acoaa St . Cn;levood, co 10110 19, l 20 21, J 22 23, l 24 ·.•. LO t U, I!.Jru ~ &\llllCS Uowy. Uts . ~~~ LUI.. ~ •.. ll 1 l..OL 9, •. ai.\ t. Klllle& Sdwy. llts . t ~~ j ., ) lt a ff.. l\Lllli.!S !lt.J wy. I!Lb., Cx . o Jlcy II Curugana Sub. ,I Cur r 1q ..a nw S u U. II Curr1g •n• Sub . 36&$' s . ""'""It If Curngans Sub. /1 " II C\ll"nvan• sw.. , 2077 Ol 2 2t 011 13 Lenderink , DonAld w. ' 10 ' s. 20 rt. of 1 4 , Haa ' Xi1liee ldVy. Hte. " n. J ., Jt Ten 314 5 s. Ac:oaa S t . tn9lewood , CO 10110 2077 Ol 2 2 9 Ol' 15 tt1oU, Charlea o .• J r . ' t e l1y . Don.n a •~· Jt Tell )1)7 I. A oaa It tn91 oooocl, co 101 0 077 0) u 0 Ce rter . er o. ~~ Corune A. • 73 6 lf. ~r y1.".ln Av •nvoJr, CO OOlH II 10 ~t~ ~)-~f ti~ ~ f 15 K1111 ea ldwy . Hta . ,, 0 10 rt. o t ~t 1•, a l I.O t 17, ' 1 t rc . ot 11, lla• 4 Kl1lu a 14 Hu . ()12~ S. A c~ St.l • I'AV o N • $556.91 $556.91 $876.21 $4 1 J8l. 08 $999.84 $1,006.85 $742.56 $742.56 $742.56 $742.56 $758.75 $668.30 3.15 I • • - ~ . r t I i I l I I I 9 NAMC AND AOOREU J077 03 2 l9 O~l l3eres, John " J1ary, Jt Ten 3811 s. ~coma ~t. Cn qlcwood, co 80llu 10 2077 03 2 29 022 Pie rson, oav 1d o. 3807 s. Acoma St. Cnqlewood, CO 80110 n -10 22 2077 03 2 29 023 Simons, Robo rt Carl ' Den i se Kaye, J e 'l'en 3801 S . Acoma St. En9lewood, CO 00110 2071 OJ J Ol 001 Carlile, Kim R . J900 S. Acoma St . Enqlewood, CO BOl l? 2077 OJ l 01 OOl Caldwell, Ruoy c. 39l2 s. Acorn. ~t. tnqlewood, CO 8Jl l ~ 23. JO 2 4 l. 2 ), 4 2077 ~) 3 01 00) 5, Cockrell, Lol3 V1rq1n1a G 3920 s. Acoma st . Cnqle-~od, co 80110 2077 03 3 01 004 7, Proctor, Roy c. ' Ruby d Fern, Jt Ten 3926 s. Aco~ St . Englewood, CO 80110 2077 03 3 01 005 9, l Beeker, Arlen 11. ' 10 :~relyn s. , Jt Ten 39)4 S. Ac_. St. tnglowood, co 10110 2077 03 3 01 006 ll, l Poater, HerthA •· 12 lUI a. Ac_. lt. ~n91evood, CO 10110 2077 03 3 01 007 Gootz, Veron ica 1. ll, 1 14 10 lt40 S. ~St. tn9lawood, CO 10110 II •• • 2077 03 l 01 001 lt"ta' JOHpb A , ' Dorothy J .. Jt Ten 3,51 •• ~ lt. tnv1eWOOd, CO 10110 2077 03 l 01 OOt eyea , Tit_. a JoMp ' C1en4a Joy, Jt ltf' •• Acoea •• zo~~·~·oyoolo 0110 nroa, 1111a 0. • """I., Jt Ten 3110 s. Aeoaa lt. tnt lewood, CO I 10 077 Ol l 01 011 Hv4ra, 1.. J, 6 A., Jt Ten lt 0 I, AC:OU I n9ltw0D4 , CO 10110 15, l u 17, 1 ll U· 21 • • • )I lo Ft. l..<>t ld, ~ll 19, 11om t. K1ll1os Ddwy. llts. 11om • Klll .·.~s Ud wy . lit~. Ham t. KlllleS !ld.-y. llts. Jacksons Bdwy. Ills . Jacksons Ddwy. lit a. Jackaon a Ddwy . Hto . Jackaona Bdwy. Hta. J a c:kaone lldvy. lite. Jacuoaa lldvy . lite. J a •on• vy . IIU. •,. of tot l, J a e ao~• J4 • Kta. ~AVINu $608.89 $1,205.8q· $742.56 $839.61 $742.56 $742.56 $924.98 $742.56 ) $1,074.08 $1,032.~ $1,100.05 $7 4 2.56 n.u I • 6 10 II I) u • • • • Ot~Ntl'lh.JN \)t ~ROI 'LifiY NAM( AND ADORE~ l011 OJ J 01 012 Wyl1e, Dorothy H. 3998 S. Acoma ~L. Englewood, ~0 30110 2077 03 J ~2 ou Fowler, Ancel Cloy ' Dorothy H., Jt Ten 3987 s . Acoma St. englewood, CO 80110 2077 OJ J 02 Oil score, I. 11. ' Stella, Jt 1'cn J27 S. Bannock St. Donvcr, CO 80209 2017 OJ J OJ 014 Brath, nobert J, ' Ca1nes L, Jt Ten 4160 s. Jason St. englewood, CO 80110 2011 OJ J 02 015 orath, Robert J. ' Col. nos L. , J t ·ron 4160 s. Jaaon St . ~B~~e~~o~,0 ~o 01 1011o HcLaoghlln, Al>ce Kay J959 S. Acoma St . Englewood, CO 80110 l8, 29 JO . 1 Jl 33 2077 03 3 02 017 34 2 Molner, Stophon R. ' T rJII)' M., Jt Ten 395 3 S. Ac:OIU St. EngleWOod, co 10110 2077 03 l 02 011 3i 2 rorroll, John L . ' VJvlan A., Jt Tan 3947 s. Acou St . Cn;lewood, CO 10110 2077 Ol .l 02 OU 37, 2 Preyer, Dav14 Chee-n 31 3410 .. lcero Lane O.nver, CO 10209 2077 Ol l 02 02 0 J9, 2 Joak1na, W1ll1 w. ' 40 wc1l10 M., Jt Ten lUI S. Ac:OIU St. en eWOod, co 0110 077 Ol l 02 0 1 41, 2 kllluta, 1'-rg~r•u ' H ~alu , Prank J., Jt T )921 t. c 9 • 10110 b '~ ot Lot. ~J, .Jll of 24, J .Jckaons dd"''Y · ltt.s. Jwcksons 1Jowy. tlt!i. Jacit!lons Dd wy. l lt.s . (3981 S. Acoma St.) I ' Jack.iion ~ Bdwy. I Its. !3977 s . Acoma St.) ,, J•cka.ona Bc.J wy . lf ts. (!>?75 5 . A.....,,., ST) ,, I( • 5 0, ot Lot 3S, Jac:kaon a Bdwy . Uta. II ' N 0, of Lot 35, Jac:kaona adwy. Uta. II J•~· adwy. llta. (3,..,5 s . ~..,.) I( Jac:uon. IIQwy . 11u. , II J .. c:ka a •I wy •••••• • $441.07 $997.99 $769.10 $742.56 $371.27 $606.18 $597.62 $604.69 $742.56 $742.56 $742.56 $1,105. $742.5 I • ~I R 'f I l " 6 9 10 II 12 ll 14 IJ , . • NAML ANU ~($5 ~011 OJ J u~ 0~4 Brook.s, Ank!l.1.a J901 S. Acoma S~. Englewood, CO 80110 ·17 , L 4ij 2077 OJ J 12 OH 24, 15 HOllilnd, :·larlo F. ' 2 5 Amella , Jt Ten 4525 5 . Aco ma St. englewood, co 80110 2077 OJ 3 12 012 26, lS Will1ams, Donald LeRoy, 27 II ' K1r.>ber ly A ., Jt Ten 4079 S. Acoma St. Cnqlcwood , CO 80110 2077 0 1 J lJ 013 l d. l!"> Horn. o. Qu~nt1n ' 29 Jeas.1.e C., Jt Ton 4075 S. Acoma St. Cnqlewood, CO 80110 2077 03 3 12 01 4 JU-1 !"> C ollJ ~r, Ma lcolm~ .• Jr.J2 6o Shelton, n ay 3460 1~. 38lh Ave. Denver, CO 80211 2077 03 J 12 015 33-15 Jones, Paul1no E. ' lS Kenneth o., Jt Ten 4037 s. Acoma St. Englewood, CO 80110 2077 OJ 3 12 016 36-15 Thaxton, NAorn1 A. 38 4029 S . ACOfta St . En91ewoe4, co 80110 • • • Ja<.:k »orh .. uuwy . H l:i,. Jacksons bdwy . Ht~. 14089 S. Acor.~a St. l J4cksons Odwy. ll t a. Jack.liiOnta lldwy. lila. " Jwcksons Udwy . Ill~. 1406 1 s. Acom .. ~L) Jackaona 8dwy. Hta. " Jackaona Bdwy. lit&. ,. 2077 03 3 12 017 Thaxton, Naomi A. 4023 s. Aco~ St. £n9l.ewood, CO IOl.lO 39, 15 Jackaona Bdwy. Hta. 49 2011 01 1 12 ou u-15 Prank1in,.aayaond a.' 43 Debra L., Jt Ten 40U I. AcOIM St. ~~*·~·1 io01 :o110 Hoak1na, Nill1a• N. ' L c11le M., Jt Ten 3939 S. Acoaa St. Cn9l&wood, co 10110 2077 03 l 13 ~:11 Jol\naon, t.ruc:e tl, ' J 11& L. , Jt Ten 4000 S. Acoaa St. tn9lewood, CO 10110 44-lS ., 1, 2 16 2077 OJ 3 ll 002 3, 16 t.Anu b, Leo r. ' Kar91•c L., Jt Ten 1550 1. D&rt.o th Ave . 1191&wood, co 10110 017 Ol l lJ 003 , lll•y. Don o. 40 45 a. lroadw y Cnt1• • co 10110 077 ) l ll Yo 111, John Jeann L., J 4020 I , Ar: r.ng l e , co oc ' T n St. 1011 ) 5, 6 7. I ,. Jackaona ldwy. Hta. II Jacka-. ldvy. Hu. (400 1 S. Aca.a St.) II Jackaona ldwy. lite. I' Jackaona ldvy. Hte. (4010 •• Acoe. lt.) /I Jack n a lid lit&. (4014 S. Aca.& St.) • $819.10 $814.08 $740.08 $740.08 $1,110.12 $1,110.12 $1,228.11 $740.08 $1,134.90 $1,104.20 $863.30 $1,048.54 $828.57 $740.08 I • • • • , '"'''-' I o -o ... ~ .. UII o U I U , n ~o , Ot.~CMit'IIUN Ut 111CVI'L..:IY I',AV I Nv --·· ---------J ~ N.A.ML ANO A008E~ lol ~1 .,1(\. :.UitOIVISoiON l 2011 Ol l ll OU5 ~. Ito JdiCk~UIHt lldwy. tiL ~. $740.08 I fin loy, Donald D. 10 (4022 s. 1\comol >il.) db.:~ F J nlcy ' Co•r :.1 "ny 404~ s. Udwy . ~ CnylcwooU, co UUIIO i077 OJ 3 13 006 11, 10 Jack.oona Udwy . !ItS. $849.10 Svigol, Joe, Jr. • 12 (402 8 s. Acoma 5<.) ' Bernice~., Jt Ten 5390 S. Windermere St. Littleton, co 80120 2077 OJ 3 13 007 1 ], H Jack&ons Odwy . lll!i, $740.08 Sviqcl. Joe, Jr., ~ 14 (4050 s. Acoma St.) Bcrn1ce ~1., Jt Ton 5390 s. \o/indermere St. Llttluton, co 80120 2077 Ol 3 ll 008 15, 16 Juck&ons UcJwy. t:L ~. $740.08 f'ab.&.an, John a. 16 • 4062 s. Acoma St . tn9lewood, co 80110 207 1 Ol l l) 009 17, Ho Jct.Ck.»OOal Ll<Jwy. IIlli . $740.08 Sv1qcl, Joe, Jr . ' 18 (4066 5. Acoma !;l.) UOrnlCO MCAy, JL Ton 5390 s. WJ.ndorau:re St. Littleton, co 80120 2077 OJ 3 ll 010 19, 16 ' N ~ ot Lot 21. $1,140.35 ' Svigel, Joe, Jr. ' 20 Jackaona Bdwy. Hta. I 0 Bernico n., Jt Ten (4070 s. Acoooa St.) 5390 s. WinderMre St. ~ Llttloton, co 80120 " ! 2077 OJ 3 13 011 16 s~ ot Lot 21. all of 22 $999.10 i SVJ.CjJal, Joe, Jr . ' ' 23, Jackaona Bdwy. Uta. Ucrnice ~1., Jt Ten (4016 s. Acoma St.) ~390 s. Windo~ro St. L.aUoton, CO 10120 .1077 08 1 02 007 12 l Centennla1 Induatrial $667.47 I 11a.,.c, Coor90 n. ' !!dna Park 1'. ~ 4596 s. Fedoral Blv4. I l:nq1o wood, co 10110 2077 08 l 02 001 11 l cantennial Induatrlal $349.10 1\daaa, Geor9e a. '£4ne Park 9 P. 2929 w. Union Ave . tnglewood, co 10110 I 2077 01 l 02 010 ' l Centennial Induatr al $369.03 Ada-. Geor9e a. ' Edna Park I 10 r. ' Halveraon, Geor9ia CUlt w. Union Ave .) I Ann, Jt Ten J 2929 ll. Union Ave. Cn<Jlewood, co 10110 11 2077 01 l 07 001 l 4t CeAcannlal Acrea lth r19. $129.61 Chr atanHn, Donald A. ' 12 Cla .. ncia, Jt Ten lUI W. dclUf Dr. nql wood, co 10110 0.13 ~011 oa 1.01 oot 49 ontennlal Acre• ItA Fl9. $1 raha , ron P. u Ceryl A., Jt Ten llOS W. cl tf Dr. t.n vl ' co 10110 .,, 0 ~7 9 Conu. nu /W:r"• H!\ I' -1· 379.99 H.il9•. Jean c . 14 3003 w. ~edclUt Dr. CnCJl ' co 10110 I • u I. • - I I t l I 6 9 10 II 12 13 •• IS •• • • - Ol~WII 'I I VI-' ~t , ~UiliC I~· !.UIDtV!~UN J.01 1 08 2 0~ OOu ... 1 ;I~ Ccntonn1.1l .1:\~.t.io..!:. ~lh '1-i· t-tar1a, John/\. • PatrlCla P., JL '1\.:ll 3227 w. St~nford Av e. l:nglcwootl. ·o J0l10 2077 08 2 08 010 1 7 4~ C~ll tL il 01Dl A~l~~ dlh Fly. Bloodworth, Harry Henr 'j • Angela Ga~1 . Jt T~n 3lS7 w. Stanford Ave. Englewood, CO ~0110 2077 08 2 OR 012 1> 48 Ccntc nn•~1 Acres 8th F1g. N<!cl, Herbert II. 4 Clarabe1l A ., Jt 7en 3107 W. Stanford Ave . Enylcwood, co S OllO 2017 08 2 08 017 10 48 l:en~enn~dl Acro>s 8th l'lg. Thompson, Wayne N. 3001 1~. Stanford Ave. Engl~wood, CO 80110 2011 08 2 00 019 Drown, MlChdOl J. • E~lleen M., 2/3 Int ., • Moran , Donn~a, l/3 Int. 16608 E. Arizona or. englewood, co 80012 2077 08 2 08 019 Trujillo, Marcelino ' IIArvaur;, Jt Ten 3032 w. Redclif f or. Englewood, CO 80110 2~71 08 2 01 020 FrAnklln, Larv1n L. e JeanettA 4 ., Jt Ten 3056 w. a&dcl~ft Dr. ~~9·~·oio 02 ~o110 Schoaberg, E•tber ' &cbnitker, Peggy Jean. Jt Ten 110 w. Radcliff or. Entlavood. co 10110 8 48 ccntcnn1al Acrcw OLh Fl~. (3004 w. nadc1•tf or .l 48 Contann~al Aero& 8th Flg. 48 Centennial Acree 8th Flg. 2071 01 2 01 026 l U CentaAnul ACree lth 1'19• Hillyard, cary L. ' Jane 1., Jt Ten 1170 w. Redcl•ff or. tntlevoo4, co 80110 2071 01 2 11 001 4 cant nn1a Acre• 6th l'lg. Jch~~cbt, Kanneth c. • lldred M., Jt Ten 32'2 w. Stan ord Ava . tnvl ~. co 10110 2071 01 11 0 0 l~ anc. nnul cna h.h fl9· lOu c. ll.u:l\ard 1 . • IOnnle a .• Jt 7 n 10 ' w. Sta nford or . nv , co • 110 2017 ~~ 2 ll ~ l H ' nt nul 1\ t • Hh 19. De 1c 1, Al e~an r • Marqatita c .• Jt Ten 101~ w. •~•nf rv or . tn 1 • co 10110 • I'AV I Nv $226.41 $452.83 $144.90 $129.61 $268.43 $89.67 $239.65 $127.37 $331.77 $224.17 22 • 2 .13 • 6 9 10 11 12 •• , . • 2077 OB l 11 Ol1 GrLnde, Stanley L. • Linda B., Jt T~n 3150 w. Stanford Av a. Englewood, CO BOliO 2077 OB 2 ll 031 Rogers, W~lliam E. ' Nanette Jean , Jt Ten 3262 w. Stanford Av e. Englewood, CO BOllO 2077 OB 2 13 001 Fchr, James W~ll~am ' Oelorea J .• Jt Ten 329B W. Tufts Avo. ~~~jc 0 ~~·1 3o 00 ~o11o L1n1nger , G1fford V. ~ Patr1c1a Ann, Jt. Ten. 32B7 w. P>ml>co or. Enqlewood, CO BOliO l077 08 ~ 13 OOB Kylo, Na~han J. • ralrl.c~a Anu, Jt Ten 3195 W. P1m11c0 Or. Cnq1ewood, CO 80110 2077 OB 2 l3 010 P~ttman, Arthur L. ' Grace P., Jt Ten 3165 w. Pim1ico or. Cnq1awood, CO 80110 2077 08 2 l3 Oll I nco""' Roal ty 1o lltq., lnc. 2100 W. M•••••••PPl Ave. Dcnvor. CO 80223 2071 08 2 ll 015 IJLxlor, Charlo• o. 30~3 ~1. PiJu1•co Dr. Lnqlowood, CO 10110 2077 08 2 ll OH Barrett, Dencia £. • Wilu J., Jt Tan 4491 s. WOlcott Ct. Denver, CO 10236 2011 01 2 ll on Ph~llipe, Lorna s. 3176 W. Tufta Ave. Cnqlowood, co 10110 2077 01 11 OlO I eh, DoroU\y z. 3261 w. ~fta Ave . tnq1ewood, co 10110 2077 01 2 ll Oll Adain1ttrator of Vet Affa1n Veta. ~. lldq. Wa•h•nvton, o.c. 04 77 01 2 14 001 , T cry L. " ndu L., Jt Ten l t6 1~. Pla •co Dr . tn l wood, CO 101 0 on 01 u 017 11, en ory 11. • nn K., J\. Ton )00 P••1•co Dr. I h'il • , CO 10110 )l 24 23 19 • • • WbOIV I ~ION 4 i Cont~nnl~ A~~cs 6th Fly. 4) 41 41 ~cnLcnnl al Acru~ 6th Flg. Centenn~al Acres 6th flq. t:t.!Olt.::nnl.Al /\ct·cs bt.h Flg. Ccntcnnl~l A~rc~ Ulh rl~. Ccntonn1.al Acrca 6th Fl9. Ccntcnn>al Aero• 6th Flq. (3145 w. P1mlico Dr.l Centenn••l Acre• 6th Flq. 10 41 cent.annl.al Acrea 6th J'lq. (3136 v. ~fta Ave.) I 41 centann al Acre• 6th r1g. 3 41 Centenn a1 Acrea 6th Flq. 40 Cantennlal Acree 6th Plq. (3271 w. T~fta Ave.) ~.:ontenn1 1 A r nt nn • A 1 • eth r ~· • IIAVINv $230.73 $127.37 $226.41 $127.37 $580.20 $125.13 $146.85 $452.83 $344.82 $353.79 $226.41 $353.79 $226.41 $259.23 I • • • • -----------··------------------~· I --------------- 2077 08 2 14 OlO 40 6 9 10 Matzke, Oan1e l Lee & Rosemary LOuJ.se, Jt Ten 3078 w. P>ml>co or . englewood. co 8011 0 2077 08 2 14 021 McCann, Harold w. io Joa n G.,JtTen 3092 W. Pim 1>CO Dr. englewood, co 80110 2077 08 2 14 023 Duran, Thomas R. & suaan , Jt Ten 3126 W. P>m l>CO Dr. ~~1~·~~o~,1~o 0 2 ~0ll0 Chipman, Jack R>chard • Georg i ann, Jt Ten 3148 w. Pimlico or. englewood, co 80110 20 77 08 2 14 025 C~mbcr, cava R. & J oyce L ., Jt ·ren 3160 w. Piml>co or. englewood, co 80110 2077 08 2 l4 026 BryAnt, folarvl.n t. ~ Plora Delle, Jt Ten 63 85 s. Eaton Ct. Littleton, co 80123 2077 08 2 14 027 I/L1ch, 1\rthur w. • Mary u .• Jt Ton 10 9 1194 w. P1alico or . Cnylcwood, CO 80110 2077 08 2 14 028 5 HcK>nley , ~chAr d E. ' ou rothy c., Jt Ton l20G W. Rialico Or. Cn9lewood, DO 80110 2017 08 Z 14 OZ9 .. 4 Wilke, Ro~d Ottaer llennie • LOla 14 . , Jt ,..n 3231 W. Pialico Dr. Englewood, co 10110 2077 01 Z. U Oll 2 tlcClW>;, aettY t.. 3274 w. Pialico or. ~n;lewoo4, co 10110 40 Ccnten n>al Acres 6 th F lg . 4U cuntcnn1al Aero& 6th F lg. 40 Ccntenn1~l Acres 6th Plg. 40 Ce ntenn>al Acres 6th Fl9. (3172 w. P>ml>co or.) 40 Centannu1 ACre e 6th Flg. 2077 01 ) oz 006 M~••• Sll&rOn A . 2t 37 Centennia l Acres Stb Flg. (3371 w. Chenango Ave .) 11 12 2519 Wa.rd Dr . Lll.llewood. co 10 21 s 2017 01 l oz 007 Kertin, acval w. ' Verne c., Jt ,..n ll'S . Cbenen;o Ave . englewood, co 10110 2077 01 3 02 Oll Moore, 11. Elton U • lllt w. Chenango Ave. ng1c ood, CO 10110 017 0 3 0 Oll lchenll, Ronald 1.. i 14 , 04r1 ne M., Jt ,..n llll w. Chenango 1\~. COQ1u Od, CO 10110 •• l7 37 ~A'J I N C $643.45 $248.02 $391.08 $122.89 $136.30 $160.30 $263.54 $384.07 $228.65 $129.61 $514.65 $410.50 $197.27 $26.90 I • - I I I o ,.._.,._.,,, , • ... ,.,,.,,. 1 ·•Lu ---------:-· HAM£ AND ADDAES.i 2077 08 3 02 017 Bol1s, John P. ~ El1zabeth A., Jl Ten 3303 w. Chcn~ng o Ave. englewood, co 80 llu 2077 08 3 03 002 Sm i ~h, Robert w. & Martha Y. BOX 82A Pearl Rlver, LA 80452 2077 08 3 03 010 sm~th, Charles R., Jr . ' Lwd.a L ., Jt Ten 3357 1~. Grand Ave . ~~~~e 0~o~,0 ~o 01 ~ol lo scott, Charley J. & Karen E., Jt Ten 3351 W. Grand Ave . englewood, co 80110 2077 08 3 03 012 Zook , H"rry T., Jr. ' Elizabeth A., Jt Ten 3345 w. Grand Ave. ~nglewood, CO 80110 18 36 28 27 26 J7 44 44 • • • Ccnt~nnl d l Ac~us ~th fly. ~unLenn1 al Acres 7 t h Fl~. !3399 w. Grand Ave .) Ccn tenn1al l\cre s 7th r lq. Ca ntennla l l\cra• 7 Lh Flg. Cuntcnn1al Ac res 7th Fl~. 2077 OS 3 03 013 25 Cantenn~al Acrca 7th ~lg. VanP~ymbro~ck, Arth~r M. 6 ' Alice M., Jt Ten 3337 w. Grand Ave. Englewood, co 80110 2077 OS 3 03 021 17 Centenn~al Acree 7th Pl;. Heane, C~rt1e R. ' Roac Hary, Jt Ten 3310 w. Chenan;o Ave. englewood, CO 10110 2077 08 3 04 003 l7 2l Cant.enn~al Acre• 2n4 Fl9. u Zimbor;, A~rora MArie 3279 w. Grand ~ve. En;lawood, CO IOUO 2077 . 01 .3 04 oos - nalloy. c:Aarl .. z:. -' 9 Jtuoona M. , Jt Ten 3239 w. Grand Ava. Englewood, co 10110 2077 01 3 04 006 Ana~~~, llejiab ' >O Phclor.ena 11 12 I ) •• c/o Harold J. Ferrall 1121 w. tth Ave. ll&atl.nga, NE 6UOl 2071 01 l 04 001 lt&nolak •· Ja•• c. ... o. loll 1057 ~ttleton, CO 1016, 077 01 3 04 0 9 H~la, George A. & R th lt., Jt Ten 3149 w. Ccand Avo. Envlewood, co 10110 2077 01 l 05 011 lone, 11oil r. ' Waune a P ., J~ Ten llO~ w. Mon~uth Av o. Cn9lowood, CO 10110 19 21 Centennial Acree 2114 Fl;. 20 21 Centennial Acree 2nd Flg. (l20t w. Gran4 Ave.) 22 21 Centennial Acrea 2nd Fl9. (ll6t w. Gcand Ava .) Centenn1al Acrel 2nd Pl9. • roA VlNt.o $230 .73 $364.96 $479 .32 $450.61 $554.73 $662.80 $226.41 $726.61 $187.20 $461.51 $226.4l 758. 4 224.17 I • • - • ,. • , .,.;)1..~\1\lf,.l 1.•\l \...UlAIIUN I~ , .............. , .... 04.ltl.J(t .. I >VN Ot ~W\J Plli l't I'AV I N V ~ ---------------- I NAM( AND AODa($$ '"' Blo-.' ::tUbO tV1$1UN 2077 ou 3 0~ 01.! lb .;J ~cnti.!Oilld.l A~n.!::t 2nd l'1q . $353.78 l ...:ompo, Lt.: on 1-1. • ~ Justlnc r., JL 1'Cn 30 9 3 w. ttonmt.)u th 1\vc. L.:nglcwooU, ..:o 8011 0 2077 00 3 OS 013 27 Centcnn.1.u l J\cras 2n<l F1g. $131.86 Linroth, J. ( ?>0 7.!, i1o,.rn.:~r") 3037 w. Monmouth Av e . 1../ Englewood, co 80110 2077 08 3 OS 0 14 28 lO Ccnt~Jnnl" Acres Jnd r q. $386.82 Sch1.llo, !:dna H. ' Leach , Nor nus Lee, Jt Tan 3033 li. ~1o umo uth Ave. .Cngluwo..xJ, co 90110 2077 03 J OS 01 S 29 20 Ccntcnnhll ~'ere:. 2orl !'l1.1. $619.86 lie Kay, LOU1 0 Doc • oonn1.c Lcl.CJh, Jt Ten 3013 u. ~lonmou th Avu. Englewood, co 80110 2077 03 3 OS 017 20 Ccntonnlal Acres 2nd rlg. $741.84 Horne. Rox £. ' I:lS1.8 L., Jt Ten 3002 "· Cr&nd Ave . l:nqla..,ood , co 80110 2077 08 ) OS 018 20 Con tonn1~1 Ac1u a 2nd 1'19. $4 .83 JI Din5C:\, N lll.c t.cc 1022 t;. Grand l\vc. nljlc~o"OO<I, co 80110 20 77 oa ) 0~ 019 20 C8ntann~Al Acres 2nd Fl9. $267.56 th.cka.la, Joo 1'. ' Ina, J ~ Tlln 3062 ~. Gran4 Ava. ~~~0~~·0 ~o 02 ~o11o 6 20 CaDtenn1a1 Acree 2nd Flg. $382.72 oonan, cenr4 P • • Jaannetta P., Jt Ten ll06 w. Grand Ava. £nglewoad, co IOllO 2071 01 ) 0~ 02. • 20 Centennia l Acrea 2n4 Flg. $372.22 Soar a. Fr&nlt a. 4 Rut.b 10 G., Jt Ten lUG If. Grand Ave . ~gy~e~,0~~2 :o11o 10 0 Cantenn•al Acrea 2nd 1'111· $972.08 Ma9era, llalter A., Jr. II 6 Ju41th I ., Jt Ten }196 Gra nd Ave. Cnglevood, co 801 0 2071 01 l OS 021 ll 20 Centa nnl al Acree 2nd rlll· $196.3 If a 1 t n, George w, ' 12 Fern c:., Jt Ton lllO Gra nd liVe. Cngle . co lOll 2011 01 ) 05 0 • 0 Cent. nn1a-. A~ro ~nd Fli• $205.1 .anna . AVld ' I) r .lln 1a H., Jt T n 2)0 I . rAnd 1\vu. t:n91 od, co 10110 1011 oa ) 0~ 0 ~ l l iO l' ntunn• 1 c lnll 111· $23 .97 ,. 1nk, rank w. • I 14 ,\lu: . Jt T II , ~0 Cr1u .\V" • • ~~·~ .. ~0 wo 10 1$ • • • • 1\',~L!lo)MlNI Ll\li ... ULAIION lOt\ OUCRIPIION IJf P6hJPiMIY PAVING NAME AND AOOIUS 1017 08 3 06 001 4i untenra.ll Acrl.!r. 7lh ' $1,809.03 ,;. 9· Sommer, J. oav1d • (3J9a w. Grand Ava.) Darlene, Jt Ten ! 2 446 5. ?.ephyr llay Ol.!n v cr, co UOlrl 2077 08 3 06 0 0 1J 45 entc11nl ~l Acres 7 th flg. $353.79 Ray, Kenneth Wood " (3300 w. Grand Ave.) :4 alce, Jt Ten 211 w. Oav1.es Ave. N. Ll.tt lcton , co 8 0 120 2071 08 3 06 021 17 45 CcntcnnJ~l Acres 7 th F1<j. $230.48 Matton1., Jack 11. ' 3 V1r91.0 1.A L., Jt Ten 3308 w. Grand 1\vc. I:ng1cwood, <:0 80110 2017 08 3 06 022 16 45 Centenn1 a 1 Acrea 7th F1q. $351.54 tU:Garey , I:1mer I:. ~ ' All.Ce ~1 ., J t Ten 3314 w. Grand Ave. englewood, co 801 0 l071 08 3 06 023 lS 45 C~ntenn.1 o l 1\cr\.!& 7th 1'1111. $229.94 Carlllo, Sarct J. ' 5 Hunter, Dan P .• Jt Ten 3320 w. Grand Ave. Enq1e.,ood, co 80110 2077 08 l OG 024 14 45 Centonnul llct·ua 7th Plg. $1,071.33 E.U., Gary E. ' Roaalle 6 K., Jt Ten 3330 w. Grand Ave. t:ngle~od. co 80110 2077 08 l 06 02 5 13 45 Centenn1al Acroa 7th Fl9. $992.66 Anlundaon, Donald A. ' Uu lan A., Jt Ten 33 34 w. ~and Ave. t:nQle...oocS, co 80ll0 $224.17 ~077 08 3 06 030 8 45 Centennial Acrea 7th Fl9. Navare~t e, J•••• F., Jr. i ll1lde, Jt Ten 3366 w. Grand live. J:nglowood, CO 10110 7th Flg: 2Q77 01 l 06 036 2 45 eenteMia l Ac:re• $129.61 Steon, IIOnald ., .... ' Arlena H., Jt Ten ll96 w. ~and Ave. lnqla oo4, co 10110 $835.06 077 01 3 Qt 001 lS u een,enni&l Acre• 2A4 Plg. HcKn ght, Don.&ld T. ' 10 Vlvl.an •• Jt 'l'etl 3216 w. Monaouth Ave. l:nlll• od, co 10110 2on oa 1 ot oo2 16 lt C&atann a l Acre• nd Flg. $434.49 Kilca, va a M&a II l IS w • .. lle or. !;A awood, co 10110 1'1 u ntenn1a Acre 2nd Plg. 53.3 19 lit. Ml•l t.cza p $707.57 or. , ent. nnu l A rea n4 n,. n c: cJ n w. .. ne or . 1 ,. 111 J D • • Ltt t.Oft, co 101 J II • • NAMf AND AUOi~ 2077 08 3 0~ OOL t:dde, /Ida Jo 320 5 li. D"1 lcwo <..J Or. t:ng1cwood, CO 90110 i011 08 J 09 008 Ell~oet, Marlene K. & Applegate. t1erv1.n L., Jt Ten 3163 w. Bel1ewood Or. l>ng1cwood, co 80110 2077 08 3 09 010 BOrchert, !4c:Lrvl.n c. ' L~la K., Jt Ten 3123 w. Be1lewood Dr. englewood, co 80110 2077 08 J 09 01 5 Johnson, AuHtln c. ~ Selma I., Jt Te n 6800 ~1. 16th Ave. Lakewood, CO 80215 2077 08 3 09 016 Warden, Tlna c. o 3001 w. Bellewood Dr. Cn91ewood, CO 80110 2077 00 J 09 01 7 ,·lore&, J1mnue L. '- ~~MlC Arlena, Jt Ten 100 w. Monmouth Avo. 1:J1 qlewo0<1, CO 80110 . on os J og oa ;~orm , Rlch~~d Alan • Holly SilO, J~ T n 1018 w. Monmou~h Avo. ·n v1er.'OOCL CO 10110 2077 01 l 09 Olt lloanoy, Mary t.. 9 3036 w. Monoaouth Aw. Cft9 wood, CO 10110 • • • ~"I 11 0(~ WllDI V~ON 22 19 ccnt~nn1al Acre s lnd fly. 24 19 Cent~nn~al llcrc• lnd f1g. 29 19 Ccntunn~a1 Acre~ ln.J f"lq. (3 021 w. so1luwood Or.) JO 19 Contcnn~al llcrcs lnd F19. 19 Centennial /lcroa 2nd Fl9 . 2 19 Contonn•al Acre& 2nd Fl9 • 2077 01 3 09 022 6 10 II 12 • .1'1ac , Fran c. ' MAry til on 3112 Monmouth Avo. Cng1ewood , co 10110 2077 01 ) 09 02) 1\Aduao.D, llodiiO)' £, ' II r u 1:., Jt Ten 1132 W. Kon.auth Avo. &nq OOd, CO lOll~ 2077 01 3 Ot 024 oc, ll&col4 o. r erot L., Jt Ten HU • •10 "th Av ~nole WOOd, co 10110 2077 01 ) 09 0 ~ Lo9 n. war y i:llon, Jt 3 7 W, Av nQle 110 011 0 lt • Wly. l.S rt., CUtOAA L.l Acrea 2nd Pl9. lt Wly. 1.5 .l't. Lot 1 ' Lot I tx. Wly . l.S Ft., Centenn1al ~rea 2n~ Fl9 . lt y. 1.~ Ft. Lot • Lo~ t , CentO.II.IIlal ~rea 2nd Pl9. • I' A \I INu $149.09 $413.03 $338.09 $226.41 $450.59 $610.86 $392.19 $554.44 $156.92 $895.04 $1,003.12 $226.41 1 ... I • ~ ( • • • A~!:tl!:t~li:;·U U\Lt..:ULAIION FO~ DUCJI:U'II.JN u;. r'lt:OPUIIY ~-~ -·-- NAME AND AOI.>IUSS l.ol I:Uoc:L. 2077 08 J 09 Ol7 11 19 ~~ntc nnlal Aero• lnd l'lg. Mc~techen, W.1ll1.am ~1., Jr. 'Alic ~ M., Jt Ten 3206 w. Honmo uth live. englewood , co 8011U 2077 08 3 09 028 tnqberg, Jeroma A. ' Jeana D., Jt Ten 322 6 II. ~lonmouth Av e. Englewood, CO 80110 20 77 OS 3 09 029 Gettler, Law rence & ~wore, Ola Gwen, Jt Ten 3246 W. Mon mou th Ave. ~~tc 0 ~o~,0 ~o 03 go11o Seventh-Day Adventlst Assoc . c/o Dr . • Mrs . Charles llerqvall J Bradbury Lane Littleton, CO 80120 2077 OR 3 10 001 Hower, John A. ' 6 Jameaanna J ., Jt Ten 5014 s. Grove St . tngle~ood, CO 80110 2077 08 3 10 010 W~rn, Cl.ronce D. ' There•• J., Jt Ten 6901 s . .HU1 St. Utt1et.OA, CO 80120 9 . 207'7 01 J 11 001 Garde•, o. Carl ' •• 10 Gayle, Jt. Ten SQOO s. uavt.horne St.. ~''~~'lloolf0110 I lack, Dale M. ' t.o~aene II v., Jt Ten 5007 s. Grove SL. &ngl.ewood, co 10110 2G77 01 l 12 007 R1tthaler, M&rtaret A. •a 500S 1 . Ha wthorne St. nglewoocS, CO 10110 2077 01 3 13 001 Johann••· Gerald P. " .. u I., Jt Ten SOOO IL Irv>ng St. nglawo:>d, co aouo ~077 01 l 11 006 lt•rl1 ng, Michael II • • 14 ucy ;.c,, Jt ~~~ 1111 w. aau. r1. u..nvor, CO IOl~t 11 •• 12 13 14 1 11 7 1. 19 19 19 Centennlal Acres 2nd Flg. Cen e onn ta l Acras ~nU Flg. Centennl.al Acres 2nd Flg. 13266 W. Honmouth Ave.) 18 Lot 1, Ex. that part oeac. aa Bag. at SW Cor. Lot 131 Th . w 30.5 rt.: 18 17 17 16 15 15 Th. Nly. 66.5 Ft.: Th. Ely. 28.11't.: Th . 568.8 l't. to Bag., Centennial Acree 2nd P1g. Lot 13 ' that part of Lot 1 oe•c. a• .. g. at SW Cor. LOt 131 Th. W .JO.S l't.l Tb. Nly. 66.5 Pt.. to • ~iJ>a LOt ll T.b., Ely.-28-1 Pt-.1 Th. S . "·· Pt. to .. g., i . Clent.annia1 Acre& .2nd Plg. (5005 s. 1'~1 ·1~.) : Centennial Acree 2n4 l'lg. Cent.enn1al Acral 2nd Plg. Centennial Aerea 2nd Plg. C&nt.annlal Acral 2nd Pl9· C~ntenn>al Acre• 2n f?vol ~. lfoo\tr ~' r19. ') • P"V I NG $27.00 $1,379.05 $681.72 $66.85 $981.47 , $1,325.10 ~.; ' }.;'·: :. '·' $517.43 $690.04 $786.44 $188,50 $144.61 ., I • • • - • • Ul .. '-lo.h h· •U ~J I oO.Vollt l o I'AVI Nu ~ ~~-~~~ ~~~ t, NA.ML At-.1) ADOil~ ,., iilv-.1. .W801VI$li,JN ~rQul lo t ~ I l U1 I Oij 4 UJ Oll .:.; ~~l\l~l11ll dl ~Cl~b ~Lh n~. $140.82 Cyboron, John s. • Florc:nce.: :1., JL .:·e.:n <906 w. Un100 i I. t:nq c wo od, co 80110 l 077 08 4 01 013 Lt!OL!o.!tU\ 1ul \-rc~ ~t., l'l g . $226.41 f Reece, Gl<!nn R. 2916 w. Un1.on Ave . englewood, co BOliO 077 08 4 01 OH l7 Cen tennla l ~crcs ~th r1~. $1,167.04 Rusch, Randell o. • IJOlkCS, Wanda J. , Jt 'i"cn 2926 ~1. Un.1.on Ave. englewood, co 80 10 $452.83 2077 00 4 01 01~ 27 Ccntcnnl al Acres 4th rlq. Jllcobsun, KalhOCl.OC F. .. 2936 w. Un1on Ave . Englewood, CO 80110 077 08 4 0 017 6 27 CcntcnnJ a Acros 4lh l')q. $349.85 J<lnUsvat.cr, John :1. . !2 9S6 l~. Un 1on Avu.) I: cunor ~L, Jt ':'en 627 Wolfcnbcrg~r Rd. C•s tlc Rock, co 80104 $333.61 2077 08 4 01 018 27 Canlcnnl..)l Aero• 4th r19. Aehc•on, Wandell C. ;, 6 Sh•rley J., Jt Ten 2976 tl. Un1on Ave . englewood, co 80110 $237.28 2077 08 4 02 008 16 28 Centcnn1al Acree 4th Plg. Ch~11aon, Gcorgo L. ' Dora R., Jt Ten 2923 w. Layton Ave. Cn :JJ.\!'wuoU, CO 80110 $767.40 L 2~77 00 4 03 001 9 29 Contonn1a1 Acre• 4th rlg. L..IJ:h), hnLon1a P. 29 9J II. Layton Avo. Cnqluwoo<l, CO aouo 1071 08 4 OJ 018 • H Centenn~a1 Acre• 4th P1g • $363.75 CrGAthoua•, D&11aie H. ' (291~ w. Layton Ave.) 9 J11Gnaa J .. Jt Ten Rt. J, Box J42A Aurora, co aono $226.41 2077 03 4 04 OOJ 10 lO Cent nn~al Acxee 4th Pl9. O'Lc ry, J._a Robert ' 10 Janu:e Ann, Jt Ton 291 ~ ~1. Chenango Ave. l:nglaWOOd, co 10110 $226.41 2077 01 4 04 007 u JO Centenn~al Acree 4th Fl9. r.uucll, Daniel H. ' II !Uta E., Jt Ten 2925 w. Chenango live. nqle~oOd, CO 10110 $129.61 2011 oa 4 04 Ole s 30 Centennu 1\ccea 4th 1'19. VanderiNo, Tho•• c . • 12 ry, Jt Ten ~~GO w. brat a live. englewood, co 10110 $577.62 2077 01 4 04 OlS ' JO enteiUI • rea 4th 1"1 rown, R.o ald G. l l 2970 w. aratoge Ave. nglcw.)O , CO IOU~ 077 0 4 05 l 31 c nt "' , .. roa 4th Flt. $226.41 I .~ 'ftli)Ot't, Paul D. ' • ,. Andr•a L., Jt Ten 2914 1~. Chonan o Ave . Lru~l'·"""'ou• co 10110 IS •• • I i • • • J\J)l!>)MLN r LAU •. Uli\IIUN IUJt Ol:SCRJP fiON l)f PROPUtTY PAV J NG -----_..,_ NAML A ND ADOlf~ 2077 ou 4 05 00 4 Obe r ley, Lor~na ~- 2954 w. Chenango Av~. Englewood, CO 80 110 2077 03 4 05 007 ~O bln&on, S. Frances 2914 W. Chenanqo Ave . englewood, CO 8011~ 2077 08 4 05 009 Woodlee, llerle o. ' Corliss v., Jt Ten 2904 w. Chen4ngo Ave . Englewood, CO 3 0110 2077 08 4 09 009 J<aza, Donald J. 5000 Plnyon l't eton, co ao 23 2077 OQ 4 09 010 Ko% , Oon•ld J. ~ 5000 P1nyon Llttleton, CO 3012) 2077 08 4 09 011 _ ~oza, Donald J. • 50~0 Plnyon Llttleton, CO 80123 9 10 11 2077 08 4 09 012 12 Koza, Donald J, 50QO P1nyon Llttleton, CO 80123 207 7 8 4 09 013 11 Kou, Donald J. sooo Plnyon L>tt eton, CO 10123 2077 01 • Ot 011 .11 9-Kou, Dooa1d J. 5000 Plnyon • ~t~etoo, CO 10121 2077 I 4 Ot 011 ltou, Donald J . 10 sooo rlnyon Llttloton, co 101 3 II 077 01 • 09 020 lto&A, Donald J, 5000 hnyoa Uttlat.on, co 10 0 2077 0 4 Ot 0 1 21 aver, 1. L. ' nn1tta 12 ; a ., Jt • n 2714 un1 n Ave , tn91 • co 10110 • 2077 01 4 Ot 0 2 I ) J. 0 ) T • ~t01VI$t0N Jl ContonnLa Acres 4th ~19. ll Centenn1a1 Acres 4th F 1g. ll Cen t cnn1a Acres 4th Flg. Cen tonnla Soueh (27 40 W. Un1on Ave.) CcnLonnlD South Centenn1Al South Ccnt~nnla l So~th can t&DJU•l South Cantennlal outb n«nn1&1 iOvth ntannlal uth en~ nn a o til • $127.37 $160.30 . $580.20 $2,848.36 $793.49 $701.39 $721.73 $656.77 $298.72 $1,036~'36 $1,190.89 $2,600 .58 $2. 97.79 $461.67 ·~ I • I t It I I . 6 - II 1a ,. II • • • • ,. • Ol)o(Wii'IIUN Ut l'ihJI'li(IY NAML ANO AOOiW 1017 10 1 02 ou ChccsNln, F rcdcrl.ck A. Jerl.lynn to•., J t Ten 4391 s. Aco:na St. CnglcwooU, co 801 0 20 77 10 2 02 013 Hcf'arland, Robart D. Jacquel.1ne J., Jt Ten 7000 s . Penroae Ct • LHtleton, co 8012 2 2077 10 2 02 014 Pulley, Jamea H . Helen C., Jt Ten 4381 s. AeOIIIA St . Englewooc1, co 80110 2077 10 2 02 015 Hordoner, JAaea c . • U.rr1on D. ,.Jt Ten 4 377 s . Acocwo St. Cnqlowood, co 10110 2017 10 2 02 0.\7 II <Nell, J.oaa 1 . 4l4l S, ~ St. C09l WOod, CO IOUO 077 0 u 0 v •• IMII, 14& •• 4500 •• 1\oo.a St. ' co 101 0 17 0 0 ' Loo bl.x:~ 11), JO 33, 2 34 35-2 37 1 MII01VI$tON Wol1enwabara Bdwy. Itt..~. 2nd 1\dd. when pl at "' f>lcd Ocsc. as nuq . 376 F't. w ~ 790 f't. ;; of 51.: Cor. of N'> of NW I, ~cc. 10·5·b8 ; Th. N 50 f'c. l Th. w 12S f't. l Th. s so F'L: Th. 1: 12S f't . to Beq. Lo t& 31-32 Blk. 2 Uoll enwebora Bdwy . tits. 2n d Add. when plat ... f>1od Deae. as Beg. 376 f't . W ' 840 Ft. N of Sl: Cor. of N~ of NW~ See. 10·5-68 ; Th . N 50 f't.: Th. W 125 Ft.; Th. s so Ft .; Th. & 12S Pt. to Beq. (4 385 s. Aeom.a St .) Wollenweber& Bdwy . Hta. 2nd Add . when pl.ot u filod Deae. a& neg. 376 Ft. w ' 890 f't. N of S& Cor. of N~ of NW• See. 10-5-68: Th. N 50 .Ft.: Th. W 125 Ft.; Th. s 50 Ft.; Th. & 125 Ft. to Beg. Wollenweber• ldwy . Hta. 2nc1 Adc1. wben plat ia flled Deac. •• Deg. 376 Pt. w ' UO Ft. H of SJ: Cor. of N~ of Nw• See. 10-5-61 : Til. Ill 75 Pt.: Th . w us Ft.r Th. s 75 Ft.: Th . a 1:15 Ft:. 1:0 .... 9. llollan ... bara lllwy . llta. 2n4 Add. vtlen plat ia f1lac1 Deac . aa .. 9 . )76 Ft. W 4 1065 Ft. W of the S& cor. ot w~ of MW~ c. 10-5•61: Tb. M 25 Ft .r Tb . w 12$ rt., Tb . s 5 l't .; '"'· 1: us rt. 1:0 .. 9 . ,. .. n s..o. •• t.l'ho ••• ':'1'. cor •. 14HO a. rt. Lot • u a 11 rt. 111 ce•n• s I&. I • t'AVINC, ----- fr~,~o~u LOI ''""' ... , • !o-: z ... ... , O.plh ·-.. $136.75 $232.03 $676.9 9 $407.99 $l,007 .40 $1,037. . . . I • ! l i ' '· NAM[ 1\NO ADORt$S l 017 03 ~ 0' OH 1Jua!cl.1., J:clward F. " Dorot.hy t1. , J t Tun 4702 S. U~catur Sl. Englewood, co 80110 2077 08 4 09 025 Ayars , Tl~Othy M. ' Lcshe A., Jt Ton 4710 S. Decatur St. Englewood, CO 80110 2077 08 4 09 026 Kandolf, Carole 4712 s. Decatur St. englewood, co 90110 2077 08 4 0~ 027 Whtaonhunt, "-rgaret J. • ' Lynn, J t '!'en 4720 S. Decatur St. rnylewood, co 80110 2011 oa 4 ot 028 Turner, Ralph r. ' llf>var ly N., Jt Ten 4722 s. Docat~r St . £n9lawood , CO 80110 2077 01 4 0~ 02t Den•on, Willi .. 1. 4 730 s. oo~at~ St. CngloW004, CO 10110 2077 01 4 Ot 030 Cyboron, John I, 6 ' Knoll, arian D. 4732 1. De~atur St. J:ngleW004, CO 10110 2077 01 4 Ot 031 r rllnger, Glenn 10 IIAY~=~Cnd ' Lau.ra Jean, Jt Ten II 12 I. 4 7C~ S. De~atu.r St. 9 1 WOOd. co 10110 • 2077 01 4 Ot Ol2 Sa •••r, Sher .. n J. ' X.thy, Jt '!'en 47C l 1. De~at~ t . rng W004, co 10110 2077 10 2 02 010 c ' v o. 74tl I. Colora o Ct. Lltt1e~on, CO 101 a • • • Lot Utoc~ ~IOIYI~ON s. l Lc..>t l, C!.!ll t\.!Oill...ll So. N po rt~on of Lot 2 Ocsc. as Rcq . :-J\V C:or . !id. Lot; Th.; SW 29'; Th.; S~ 10~.61'; Th . N 2 9.47'; Th. NW 102' to Hag. Cen~enn1al South s . port.1.on ot Lot 2 Desc. as Seq. sw Cor . Sd. Lot; Th. SC 106'; Th. NC 27. 34'; Th. )I 1.45'; 1'h . NW 105.61'; Th. SW 29' to Seq . Cantennlal Souch N 27' ot Lot 3, Centennial So~th s lO' ot Lot l, Centennlal So~th N It l.Ot C, Centennlal lo~th N 21.27' ot l.Ot S, Centenn1a1 So~th Lot $, & ... II C•ntennal 1 .~7'. ~th • vi I l Ul"" CT PAVING $429.49 $340.84 $3 45.06 $322.51 $358 .35 $340.44 $340.44 $337.69 $471.40 $419.20 I • • • • -~ I I•" .. I Otl,l l ~ .. ~ ... u _"' ... "'.CY".U Dt$CIIPI IUN Vf to'llOPUn' )I AV INC'O NAME AND AOORW LoJ Bloc a S.UIDIVI~ON .) ( 2 077 10 2 1 7 OOJ c 18 ~·t. of Lot J ' a $106. 9~ .. . :.:~ Benoit, E. H. Tr. 18 X 18' Ft. ~n NE ··~~···· '~·~~~ c/o Ausfahl Genera l Cor. of Lot 4, lllk. l, ·~:/: , •. :. ;;'.,~ .. ,!,t.~ It Partnerahl.p Green s Sub . .. i.i' ~ 4509 s. Broadwa y ! J.:nglewood , co 8011 0 2 077 10 2 17 004 5, Greens Sub . $1,007.40 Quiring, Peter Leonard 6 ' Minnie, Jt Ten 4524 s. Acoma St . Englewood, co 8011 0 2077 10 2 17 005 7, Green s Sub . $1,007.40 Newbury, Stanley K. ' 8 3 Patricia, Jt Ten 4534 s. Acoma St. i~~~e1g~·1~ooo:ollo 9, Greo na Sub. $1,144·.15 Shuster, .!.ida M. 10 • 4542 s. Acoma St . englewood, co 80110 2077 10 2 17 007 11, 1 Cceena Sub. $1,010.82 C'Jvill, Jerry A. ' 12 LOrtcher, Peggy 1:., Jt Ten 4552 s. Acoooa St. El'lglowoo4, co 80110 ", ... • 6 ,: .... I . 2077 10 2 17 008 13, l Crean• s .. b . $1,007.40 Craig, Aobort T. ' l4 DorothY-A., Jt Te~ 4556 s. Acaae St. EnqleW004, CO 10110 2077 10 2 17 OOt lS, 1 Creane SliD. $1,144.15 Jlo9or•, J-• A. ' 16 I UU S. Aco.a St.) lt<l tbryn A., Jt TeA 21S 2 w. a.&ar Ava . " Cnglewoo4. Q) IOUQ. ~077 10 2 17 010 • 17, 1 .eoc-...,, $l,l84.Q9 McGlone~ Williaa '1'. • -U 9 -Loyce H ... Jt TeA -un s.~ lt. ~yje~,l~olf 01 ~ lt, 1 Cn•~· lub. $1,007.40 sw.n.y, IU.c:Uel '· ' 20 10 llogore, Jt t.n IAW)'n ll"tll, 4SIO S. AcoeA St. EA;leWOOd, co 10110 l1 ~ ' I 207i 10 2 17 012 21, 1 Cree lUI 11-b. $l,,_ • l Pritul, J t , .. :u " 4511 •• Aco.a St. ~9lewood, CO 10110 ll. 1 raena 1,723. l 4 ;) I) .. s. Cre n • l,l47.$7 I t.ll 26 •• • .. 1. • -• • • Oht..JIU'Ii ... N ~ I IIIVI'l ~l '( NAMf ANO AOOUSS 2077 10 J 1d 014 Holmberg, Robart t. ' Norma L. , J t •r.,n 4589 s. Acoma St . £nqlawood, ~0 80110 2 077 10 2 18 015 Stolt. Theodore J. 4581 s. Acoma St. Englewood, CO 801 10 lOI 27, Jij 2 9, 30 2077 10 2 1 8 016 31, Mllner, Gerald 1. • 32 Lula H., Jt Ton 4573 s. Acoma St. £nq1ewood, CO 80110 2077 10 2 l8 017 33, Mloc.i.. Adm. of Veteran& hffe1r&34 4 Veta. AdMr. Bldq . Waah1nqton , D.C. 20420 6 7 2077 10 2 18 018 Cooper, Curt~• w. ' Karin 1<. • Robert Scott, Jt Ten 4557 S. ~ St. englewood, co 80110 2077 10 2 11 Olt Mylund, John E. • Derniee J., Jt Tan •~u s. A.coaa st. Englewood, Co 10110 35, 36 37-2 . lt 2077 10 2 ll 020 ' .... o. 2 SeW<ra, Don Ardlur 41 J--. ~DoDD& t.., .1~ '-n 4S.5 I. A.c ... St. £n9~, CD lOUD 2017 U...2 ll O:U. .,U .,2 ' Ptl ... U., .JiillW. A. .u ... 9 4535 •• --lt •• 10 II 12 u '" •• • EAv1..._., CD .aouo 2011 10 a u ou aou .... ~1o '·-• .W.1ia, Jt. 1-.\ U25 1.. ~ lt . ~·r-~·1~02~0110 Clay~n, Oavid a. • lut.h IC., Jt '-n 4S Ot 1 • ._ lt . • ~.co 10110 .,_ 2 .. ~VI~ON c c~G:ns Sub. Cr .... ~nli Suo . CreenSii Sub . ,, Greene Sub. (4565 s. Acoma St.) II Greens Sub . /I Creane Sub. " er .... a sub. ,, II ,, er-aua.. • 'I ; $1,007.40 $1,007.40 $1,007.40 $1,514.52 $1,007.40 .. , $1,5ll.09 I • City of Englewood April 13, 1983 re n ll. & Ch dr le ne W. McG ill 3669 S. Acoma St. Englewo od , CO 80110 Dear Mr . & Mrs. McGill : • • • 3400 S Elato Street Englewood, Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 761-1140 e are in receipt of your assessment protest letter for Paving District No. 28 , und it was entered into the record at the public hearing on Much 28, 1983. Th e assessment amount of $1,002.44 is correct . Th e concrete sidewalk adjacent to your property which was originally sch eduled for replacement was severely displaced by tree roots. In an effort to keep your costs down, we felt that we could correct the d1splacemen t problem by the removal and replacement of one section of s1d ewa l . Upon receiving your letter in September, l98~in which you expressed concern about the sidewalk, the engineering staff re-evaluated th Sltuution and determined that, although replacement of one stone sol ved the displacement problem, the replacement of two stones would be requ1 red for an even better solution to the problem.---! apologize for not respond i ng to you in writing previously, but I was under the im- pression th t a m ber of my eng1neering staff had contacted you by t lephone and d1scussed this m tter w1th you . Since t h on tractor, th und r plac Slnc r· I , lo stone had air dy b n removed and r placed by the con- City pa1d for th1s wor nd ass ss d you for th remov 1 nt o only wo ston ,, •n r1 n I • • City of Englewood Apri 1 13, 1983 Ms. Al ice K. Mclaughlin 3959 S. Acoma St. [nglewood, CO 80110 Dear Ms. Mclaughlin: • • • 34 00 S. Elato Street Englewood, Colorado 60110 Phone (303) 761-1140 We are 1n receipt of your assessment protest letter for Paving District No. 28 , und it was entered into the record at the public hearing on March 28, 1983. Th e engineering staff has inspected the work in front of your property and does feel that it is acceptable. The unused curb cut in front of your property was required to be closed in that it goes nowhere and there IS a chain link fence immediately behind the sidewalk. The curb cut at the church was allowed to remain by special request of the church. They stated a need for that curb cut for individuals attending services in whee lch airs and for funeral services. S1 ncere ly , /~,A'· { ..... Ga y R. Di ede D1r ctor of [ngln r1ng Ser vic s R /lo I • • - - • • City o f Englewood April 13 , 1983 I. J. & Claudia Tr aynor 3881 S. Clarkso n Street englewood, co 80110 Dear Mr . & Mrs. Traynor: • • • 3400 S Elau Street Englewood, Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 761-1140 We dre tn receipt of your assessment protest letter for Paving District o. 28 , Jnd it was entered into the record at the public hearing on March 28, 1983. Th e dssessment amount of $1,179.50 for Paving District No. 28 is correct. Un der the City's paving district policy, property owners are assessed for all work in front of their property--in this case, South Logan Street-- and additionally, for a portion of side street construction--East Cornell Avenue, in this case, wh i ch was constructed in Paving District No. 27. Since payment for our paving district assessment programs cover ten years, i t wou ld be almost impossible in a situation such as this where both the ) reet 1n front of the property and the avenue adjacent to the property w re 1n need of construction, that there would not be some overlap in ass ess nts. The lotal cost of Pav1ng District o. 28 was approximately $491,000. Of t is a.o r.t, the City did pay approximately $213,000 . • I • • - • • City of Englewood Apri 1 13 , 1983 Mr. Me lvin D. Butterfield 1D 845 Morrison Rd. Denver, CO 8D22 7 Dcdr Mr . Butte rfield: • • • 3400 s Ela11 S1ree1 Englewood, Colorado 8011 0 Phone (303) 761-1140 We are 1n receipt of your assessment protest letter for Paving District ~o. 28, and it was entered into the record at the public hearing on Ma rch 211 , 1983. Si nce 1956, approximately 85 % of the streets in the City of Englewood hav e been constructed to City standard by means of paving districts. It is the Ci ty's intent to construct the remaining 15% in future pav i ng d1s tr1cts . When all streets have been constructed to City standard in this fashion , all properties will have been assessed relative to the be nef 1ts derived from their adjacent street improvements; consequently, ull c1 JLe ns are sharing in the costs of street im provements, and paving d1str1ct assessme nts become an alternative means of financing these im provemen s as oppos ed to increased property taxe s. S1nc ere ly, . ·z ... ,/ ", ., ... Gar/R. 01 e Oi r ctor of Cng 1n ring Serv1ces /lo • I • • - - • • City of Englewood Apri 1 13, 1983 Mr. Robert W. Ms . Martha Y. Smith 22 Log Cabin Lane Pearl River, Louisi ana 70452 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Smith : • • • 3400 S. Elato Street Englewood, Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 761-1140 e ilre 1n rece1pt of your assessment protest letter for Paving District o. 28, and it was entered into the record at the public hearing on March 28, 1983. We apprec1ate the payment of your assessment in full at this t1me. Si nce 1956, approximately 85~ of the streets in the City of Englewood ha ve been constructed to City standard by means of paving districts. It is the Ci ty's intent to construct the remaining 15S in future paving d1 str1cts. When all streets have been constructed to City standard i n this fashio n,all properties will have been assessed relative to the be ne 1t~ deriv ed from their adjacent street 1mprovements~ consequently, all c1t1Lens are sharing in the costs of street improvements,and paving d1s tr ict assessments become an alternative means of financing these improve~ n s as oppos ed to increased property taxes. S1nce re ly, .. j, ~/. (• .._,, - G ry R. Dt d 01 rec or o £nq1n r1ng S rv1ces /lo • I • • City of Englewood April 13, 1983 Ms. Sally S. Richardson 31 9 5 S . Be 11 a i re S t . Den ver, CO 80110 Dear Ms . Richardson: • • • 3400 S Elall Street Englewood, Colorado 801 10 Phone (303) 761·1140 e dre 10 receipt of your assessment protest letter for Paving District o. 28, and it was entered into the record at the public hearing on March 2B , 1983. Th e dssessment amount of $943.68 is correct. Under the City's paving district policy, property owners are assessed for a ll work in front of their property--in thi~ case, South Logan Street-- nd additionally, for a portion of side street construction--East Cornell Av enue i n this case, which was constructed in Paving District No. 27 . Si nce payment for our paving district assessment programs cove~ten years, 1 wou ld b dlmost impossible 1n a s1tuation such as this where both the street 1n front of the property and the avenue adjacent to the property were in need of construction, that there would not be some overlap in o1ss essments. The total cost of P ving 01str1ct o. 28 was approKimately $491 ,000. Of h1s amount, h City did pay lpproximately $213,000. S1 ncer ly, /lo • I • • - • • City of Englewood Apri 1 13, 1983 Ms. Rosdlie J. Lay • • • 3400 S. Elatl Street Englewood, Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 761-1140 553 0 South Lowell Blvd. Littl eton, CO 80123 Re: Pav1n9 District No. 28 assessment against 3792 S. Acoma, property owned by Margaret Curry Dear Ms. Lay: e are in receipt of your assessment protest letter for Paving District No. 28, an d it was entered into the record at the public hearing on March 28, 1983 . lt 1s my understanding that, by this time, you should have received information from the Department of Community Development relative to the City's assessment deferral program. If I can be of further assis- tance, please feel free to call. Sincerely, Lf /' 1 , 1'<1;;. 't_t -. Gdry R. D1 d D H c or of ( n< 1 n r 1 n S r 1 c /10 I • • - • City of Englewood Apri 1 13, 1983 Mr. Brian D. Knoll 4732 S. Decat ur St. Englewood, CO 80110 De ar Mr. Knoll: • • • 3400 S Elato Street Englewood . Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 761·1140 Thank you for your comments on Paving District No. 28 at the public hear1n g on March 28, 1983. The <Jssessment amount of $340.44 is correct. Pl ease feel free to stop by the Engineering office at any time, and my staff will be happy to discuss the assessment methods utilized in determi ning the charges against yourproperty. Si ncere ly, . '/ /,, '(.~. ,/ Gary R. Di ede Directo r of Engineering Services RK/10 • I • • City of Englewood Apri1 14, 1983 Eugene J . & Faye M. Byrne 3800 S. Li ncoln St. Englewood, CO 80110 , . • • • 3400 S . Elalo Slreel Englewood . Colorado 80110 Pt>one (303)761 ·11 .0 Dear Mr . & Mrs. Byrne: Thank you for your comments on Paving District No. 28 at the public hea r ing of March 28, 1983. 1 have since discussed refinancing of municipal bonds quite thoroughly w1th our bond counsel and Hanifen, Imhoff, Samford, Inc., and under Engl ewood's charter, municipal bonds are issued in accordance with current state statutes which contain no provision for re-funding of municipal bonds. It is very likely that a re-funding provision could be incorpora ted into the City's charter; however, this would be extremely costly and would require a general election. Additionally, there is a good possibility that the refinanc in g of municipal bonds would be damaging to the City's bond rating and have a negative impact on investors with r esp ct to future Englewood bond sales. Th ank you again for your interest. Since re ly. I .. <"\. .. ;, :-.\ .t. G ry · R. 01 ed 01 rector o Eng1n nng rv1c s R /10 • I . PRESENT: ABSENT: OTHERS PRESENT: • • .. BOARD OF CAREER SERVICE COMMISSIONERS February 17, 1983 MINUTES JoEllen Turner, Catherine Pokraka, Betty Keena, Donald Weber Janet Kerzic Benjamin Craig, C.S.B. Attorney Peter Vargas, Assistant City Manager Tom Holland, Assistant City Attorney Mel BeVirt, Employee Relations Director Julie Stark, E.E.A. President Randy Pickrel, E.F.F.A. President Larry Leydon, E.P.B.A. President 5 Chairman Weber called the meeting to order. Commissioner Keena ~ moved, seconded by Commissioner Pokraka to approve the January 20, 1983 minutes. AYES: Turner, Pokraka, Keena, Weber NAYS: None Comm~ss ioner Pokraka asked i f al l association represent a t ~v r c eived a copy of the Board's packet of Administrat i v e Proc dures r e commendations that were sent to City Council. All repr s nt t i vea had received their copies. Item t h ree on the Ag e nda w s t he Assoc iat i on s ' Cho ic • Juli Sta rk, E.E .A . P r sid ent and Larry Leydon , E.P .B .A . President h d no busi nes s to present. Ra n dy P~ckr 1 , E.F.F.A . P reaid nt ask d th Bo rd to advia him of how h rLng offic r La 1 1 cted . ChaLrm n w r at t d th t th 8o rd would pr p re writt n com.unication explaining th procedure for Mr. PLckrel. • I . • • • Mr. Vargas, Assistant City Manager, stated that Council was in receipt of the Board's request and that upon a poll of the Council- members, their response was that they preferred to stay within the time frame that they have established but that they would consider making ammendments to the ordinance between the first and second reading to take into consideration any further input from the Career Service Board. Item five on the Agenda was Commissioners' Choice. Chairman Weber stated that the Board had before it a request to increase the hourly rate for legal services provided by the Board's Attorney Benjamin Craig. After a brief discussion of current comparable rates, Commissioner Keena moved, seconded by Commissioner Pokraka to approve the fee increase. AYES: NAYS: Turner, Pokraka, Keena, Weber None Commissioner Turner asked that the Board members receive a copy of the Colorado revised statute 1973 as referred to in the new ordinances 24:4:105. Commissioner Turner also asked that the E.F.F .A. and E.E.A. provide the Board vith a listing of their nev officers. As there was no copy of the monthly budget expenditures available, approval was postponed until the next regular meeting. The Board reviewed Benjamin Craig's .anthly state.ent for January. The r e being no unscheduled v i sitors, Chairman Weber accepted a motion f o r adjournment from Comm i ssioner Keena, and adjourned the February 17, 1983 reqular meeting of The Career Service Board at 7:30P.M. • I . • • • MINUTES OF ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY REGULAR MEETING February 23, 1983 The regular meeting of the Englewood Housing Authority was called to order by Vice Chairman Betty Beier at 5:10P.M. on February 23, 1983, at the Simon Center, 3333 South Lincoln, Englewood, Colorado. Vice Chairman Betty Beier chaired the meeting until Tom Burns, Chairman arrived at approximately 6:00 P.M. Roll Call Members Present: Tom Burns, Chairman Betty Beier, Vice Chairman Beverly Bradshaw, Member William Frasier, Member Cindy Peterson, Member Members Absent: None Alao Present: Frances Buck Jonas, Executive Director Linda Knopinski Housing Administrator Donna Baumann, Recording Secretary The Board agreed to delay the annual meeting and election of officers until Chairman Tom Burns and Member Beverly Bradshaw arrived. Reading and Approval of Minutes M/S PETERSON, FRASIER TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 26, 1983, WITH FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS : Page 4, para 2: Remove second sentenc and replace with "Executive Director asked for approval of the Englewood Housing Authority Board for spending at the same rate a last year's budget on Si80n Center." Page 5, para 2: Remov last thre word s of second entence and in their place insert, "initially." Page 7 , para 4: Re110v last sent nee of the fourth paragraph. HOTIO CAR.Jll D AS P'OLLO S: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bil , FRA l , PET S 0 BRADSHAW, II' K mbar II v r y Brad h arrived approxt.ately 5:20P.M. and .. tin co tinu d. Public Hou ina Projects Executive Dir ctor Frances uck J nas u mitt d th atatua r port for th duplex• for the nth of January. • I • • • • • The Board then reviewed the revised Residential Lease and Rules of Occupancy for the duplexes submitted by Housing Administrator Linda Knopinski. Vice Chairman Betty Beier referred to Section 15, Parking, sentence "Vehicles of guests shall be parked on the street unless visitors' spaces are des i gnated .", and suggested that "unless visitors' spaces are designated" be elimi na t ed so a~ not to lead anyone to think visitor spaces existed. Discussion enbu~d among the Board members and some felt that it should be left as is, t o allow fo r the possibility of future visitor parking spaces being designated. No further action was taken on this item by the Board. M/S PETERSON, FRASIER THAT THE RESIDENTIAL LEASE AND THE RULES OF OCC UPANCY FOR THE DUPLEXES BE ADOPTED AS SUBMITTED, K>TION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT : BEIER, BRADSHAW, FRASIER, PETERSON NONE BURNS Executive Director Frances Buck Jonas informed the Board that the Per fo r- mance Fu nding Subsidy formulas set by HUD fo r 1983 budgets have all been rescinded and no new formulas set or a dopted as yet. Consequently, pr paration of the 1983 budgets will be delayed until ERA has the formulas. However, Execut ive Director, informed the Board that she and the Housing Admin iatrator ha ve scheduled March 15 , 16, and 17 to work on preparation of the budget without the fo rmulas, so Englewoo d Houaing Authority will have some guid lin s to go by until adoption of a budget. Orc hard Plac The statu~> report for Orchard Place for th month of January was submit ted to the Board. Th Board lhen review d the revised R aidential L aa and Rulea of Oc cupancy fo r Orchard Place submitted by Hou ing Administrator Linda Knopinaki . Discuss on nsu d mong the Board mbers. M/S BRADSHAW, PETERSON THAT ITEM 8 UNDER THE RuLES OF OCCUPANCY FOR ORCIUULD PLACE BE CHANGED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: "THE RESIDENT SHALL DEPOSIT ALL GARBAGE, TRASH AND RUBBISH IN RECEPTACLE PROVIDED BY MANAGEMENT AND NO CARBAG OR OTHER WASTE MATERIAL SHALL BE ALLOWED TO ACCUMULATE WITHIN THE DWELL I G UNIT.", MOTIO. CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: AYS: ABSE.'i!: BEIER, BRADSHAW, FRASIER, PETERSON NONE BUR. S Althou h a motion wa not e, tb Board a re d that reference to "and yarda" in S tion 10(f} of the esidential Lease for Orchard Place should b delet d since the part nta do not hav individu 1 yard AYES: NAYS I ABSENT: lE, U AN Y RA', ' p • • • • Executive Director Frances Buck Jonas submitted a letter from Joseph W. Pahl addressed to Tom Chandler of Nelson and Company, Inc. which stated tha t l f the amount due of $1,004.94 was not paid by February 26, 1983, a lien would be placed on the Orchard Place property. A letter from Kathy Allin, Attorney for EHA, addressed to Executive Director Frances Buck Jonas was also s ub- mitted to the Board. This letter indicated she had talked on the pho ne wi t h Tom Chandler and he felt filing a lien on the property was unreasona b le since Nel~on Roth had been billed only two weeks prior to receiving the letter threatening a lien on property. Tom Chandler indicated he was having a check for the amount due sent to Mr. Pahl immediately. In Kathy Allin's letter, it is indicated that a mechanics' lien on Orchard Place could possibly be placed by Mr. Pahl if he was not paid by Nelson and Compan y , I nc . Attorney Kathy Allin makes reference to C.R.S. 1973 as amended, a copy o f which was submitted to the Board. No action was taken by the Board. A copy of letter from Joseph W. Pahl addressed to Tom Chandler of Nelson and Company, Inc. regarding resolution procedures concerning water entries a t Orchard Place was also submitted to the Board. No action taken by the Boar d. Executive Director Frances Buck Jonas informed the Board that the fina l inspection on Orchard Place has been rescheduled for March 3. Chairman Tom Burna arrived at approximately 6:00 P.M. M/S THAT THE BOARD GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: BEIER, BRADSHAW , BURNS, FRASIER, PETERSON NONE ABSENT : ONB M/S PETERSO , BE IER THAT THE BOARD LEAVE EXECUTIVE SESSION, HOTIO CARR IED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: BEI EII., BRAD SHA: , NO S , FJlAS l ER, PETERSON NAYS : ABSENT: 0 ! Executive Director gav a v r bal report to th l iability -litiga t ion in u rance cov r a on t Executive Direc t o r t o c ont inue t o obtain fu rt Board ad v i a d. Si110n C nt r Board on the atatua o f Board. Th Board adv i d r inforwation and k ep t h Th etatu report !or Simon Cent r w eub i tted to th Board. No a ction tak n. T d tenent trane er policy had b tin • Linda Knopin 1, Houein if thie pol1cJ re adopted, it , I J, d th t th poli y part1 1p ti in a pro r at th tt.&, to t 1r l aitat 1n tr rrtn • • • M/S BRADSHAW, FRASIER THAT THE POL I CY BE ADOPTED WHICH WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ASS ISTED TE NANT WHO APPLI ED ON OR AFTER MARCH 1, 1983, TO TRANS FER FRO M ONE PRO GRAM TO ANOTHER WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT FROM TH E EXECUT I VE DIRECTOR, BASED ON EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANC ES SUCH AS MEDICAL OR FINAN CIAL PROBLEMS, MOT I ON CARRIED AS FOLLOWS : AYES: NAYS: BEIER, BRADSHAW, BURNS, FR ASIE R, PETE RSON NON E ABSENT: NON E Section 8 Existing Status Report for the month of January f or Section 8 Existing was s ubm i tted to the Board. Housing Administrator Linda Knopinski informed the Board that th e waiting l ists for hou s ing assistance wer e a ll closed down effe ctive February 16, 1983. Beverly Bradshaw inquired as to when the l ists would be reopene d . Ho using Administrator s tated she wou l d have t o review the lists, turnov er s, etc . t o determi ne a reope ning da t e . It was also a sked as to how many times can a person whose name is on t he list refuse to accept participation. J.inda Knopinski stated there is no limit , their n a me simply goes to the bot t om of the list each time they decline. Bev erly Br ad s haw noted that the Se ction 8 Ex isting Status report showed calls from aubaidi&e d t e nants relating to wife and child abuse. Member Br adshaw stated that schools are required by law to report any child abuse; otherwise, they can be found neglient in upholding the law. Does this a pply to Housing Authority? Ex cutive Director stated she would find out and relay information to the Board. A graph illustrating d mographic information about clients receiving housing assistance and a copy of th HUD revisions to the 1983 Section 8 budget er aubaitted to th Board. Th Board than racaa d for a short dinner break. K/S FRASl , PIT HOUS l 'C AUTHO AYES: AYS: A.BST!litlO C irun T urn re ny furth r n VOTE FOLLO S : T I ta d fr 1 ati B S B OHl ATED FOil CHAIRMAN OF ENGLEWOOD AS VICE CHAUKAN, l«>TIO CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: , PETEllSO urn ask d if th r rd vot d. AUTBO ITY AUTKO lTY I . • • '. • Rehabilitation Program Status report fo r Rehab Program for January was subm itted to the Board which indicattd that only one loan application was approved for the month of January. Bev Brad snaw inquired as to whether th is was the presen t average, to whi ch Executive Director responded that the applications are a little low at this time; however, Housing Authority is doing some outreach. M/S PETERSON, BRADSHAW TO MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: BEIER, BRADSHAW, BURNS, FRASIER, PETERSON NONE NONE M/S BEIER, PETERSON TO LEAVE EXECUTIVE SESSION, MOTION CARRIED AS FOLLOWS : AYES: NAYS : BEIER, BRADSHAW, BURNS, FRASIER, PETERSON NONE ABSENT: NONE Status report for the Acquisition, Re l ocation, and Rehabilitation Program was submitted to the Board. It was noted that a total of 93 families are on the waiting list for ARRP; that 24 families have been scheduled for interviews, and that three typea of waiting lists will be eatabliahed as followa: 1) Single family dwelling preference; 2) Single family attached dwelling preference; and, 3) Dupl ex preference. Each family ~y be placed on any one list or on all thre waiting lists. Director's Choice Executiv Director informed the Board that there is a new project called th 202 project which ia a direct loan pro raa to non -p r ofit agencies to provide houain& for the elderly. A workshop ia otna to b h ld explaining this pro ra and Executiv Director asked h Board if th y would like h r to att nd. Th o rd ndi at d they uld prefer aavin the coat of the rk- ahop and instruct d Ex cutiv Director to find ou t what she could about th pro ra via communication. Executiv • n1 J, th appoint.-nt of Crady Franklin pl and Urb an Development and aubaitt d a Vice Cheir.an Betty Bei r also aubaitt d nt. Oth r newspaper rticlea t th r nt port tor r : a) HUD a cretary, 3 for hou ina, b) Apt . Co tru tio articles fro• Houain Affaire earlie t date that !HA c rd d by HUD for 1982 ou d 0 Conv nti n hh Octo er 27, 1982. -~- • • I. CALL TO ORDER: • • • URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY February 24, 1983 5 [ The Special Meeting of the Urban Renewal Authority was called to order by Vice-Chairman McClung at 5:30 P. M. Members present: Cole, Dickinson, McClung, Minnick, Novicky, Voth Powers, Executive Director Members absent : Fitzpatrick Also present: Alternate member Susan Van Dyke Economic Development Planner Wm. R. Hinson URA Negotiator Scott McDowell Ms. Powers introduced Ms. Susan Van Dyke, the newly appointed alternate member of the Urban Renewal Authority. Mr. Fitzpatrick entered the meeting at 5:40 P. M. II. RESOLUTION 12, SERIES OF 1983. Minnick moved: Novicky s conded: Th Urban Renewal Authority go into Ex cutiv S ssion on Re elution #2 , Series of 1983 (3601 South Logan Street). AYES: NAYS: Fitzpatrick, McClung, Minnick, Novicky, Voth, Col Dickinson Th motion carri d. cond d: Th Urb R n w 1 Authority co S ion. ut of Executiv AYES: AYS: Fitzpatrick, H Clung, Minnick, ovicky, Voth, Col , Dickinaon N n .atlon carrl d. r. M lun pl ur of th Authority? Hinni k .ov d: Col cond d: • I • • • • • _,_ ~:-. ?c· .... r ;; ::ade reie r ence :o the ';'ri -Party Ag r eeme n t betwe n th Ci t ::, • r~ n Ren ••a: Authcri~,-. and EDDA, ~o·h.,rein it is stated that "CoCI:lencemer:: 2~C rr~~ecu::on of ac~u:si:ion ac:ivities , i n cluding eminent ao~ain r r o - ~""=~ngs , 1: nece;;sa r Y , :o purcha_ p r oper ties designated fo r act;uisition !n :r.c: Plar.. Et'RA 1o•i ll ::~o: acquire an ' o:her rropert\' bv e:r.inen t dm:a i n u::~:e•-apprc-.•ed by Ci:Y ~0uncil and afte r cons ult ing ~o·ith ED!)A ." ~:s. Po ~o·e:rs ~:a~ed :hat City Council i;; a'•a r of th" d velopmen:::s in n go:iating ;:-u r- ch se ,f the p r cpe r :y ci:"d in Resolut.cn "2 , and sugge t ed that a 1 :ter Jc: _e ::.: tc E:>D.~ notifYing :hec cf pr ('greFs and develcr~nts en the a.:cu:.:=:t::oli ~f the ~uOject s!te. Ji5~u ~ion en~u d. ':"!:1r:i..:t\. :nt'ved : :!:z;oa:rici< seconded: A :.,tt.er ::-~ S,;nt to th ED!)A indicating that "althcugh th~ ~r~r~r:\ iF !is :ed in th Plan , th t rban R~n~~al At.::.:-r:r~· -r:::b~r ft l ;"C'U shC'uld be a-.·ar-=" of pr"- r~ ~~= ~ ~~:~~~nt f !n acqui~iti~n ~: th ~!t YES: ~.nn!cK, S v!~ Y , \"Y \ont.' . c !~~~n u, F1tzratric~, ~cC!un~ Th ~t ~n :a~r!c~. I I l. I . • • • -3- portunity to review it. Mr. Hinson stated that when EDDA Chairman Casson asked fo r cla rification of the Relocation Benefits, the "H a nd book " is what he wa s really looking for. Mr. Novicky asked if the EDDA membe rs are aware th Handbook was bein g developed? Ms. Powers stated tha they are awa r e that i t is bein g drafted. K~. Powers asked th e react ion of the ~rban Renewal Authority members to the issues posed by the EDDA on relocation policy? Mr. Novicky stated that it appea r ed to him they were advocating an ad hoc comm ittee to administer re- location benefits. Ms. Powers stated that the Urban Renewal Authority is the onl y body to provide relocation benefits . Mr. Dickinson poin ted out that the Urban Renewal Authority is a n "ad hoc committee appointed by City Council ." He further pointed out that m mbersh ip of the Autho rit y does in- clude downtown businessmen . Discus sion ensued . Mr. llnnick questioned wher e the funding wa s to com from to accompli s h all that the EDDA has s uggested in relocation benefits. Mr. McClung stated that he felt EDDA should b made aware that there are parameters that th Urban Renewal Authority mus t follow in administering relocation benefits. Mr. McClung s t ated t hat he felt it would be wrong to have another c omm itte appointed b y the City Council to administe r the relocat ion benefits. lr. Fitzpatrick felt it should be pointed out that because of monetary limit tlon s in the budget, it is impos ible at this time to do anything furth •r on r location ben fit!i than what is propos d in th Relocation Pl n. Ms. Col s ke d if it would b of b nefit to di cu s th EDDA and att mpt to make th m r aliz that not availabl . Ms. Power stat d th t sh board do realiz the monetary r striction that to work with. Mr. Voth tated th t hi opinion is il- bl , nd that th exi ting policy hould n ot b fr the EDDA h v• b n ~ubmitt d too w. d i cu d at o . • • • • • -4- Ms. Powers asked the feeling of the members regarding the distribution of the Relocation Handbook in the draft form? Mr. Voth suggested that it should be given to members of the EDDA and that they be asked to critique the draft and submit suggestions to the Urban Renewal Authority and staff. Discussion ensued. Voth moved: Fitzpatrick seconded: The Relocation Handbook Draft dated February 23 , 1983, be given to members of the EDDA with a request that suggestions be submitted to the Englewood Urban Re newal Authority and staff. AYES : NAYS: Novicky , Voth, Cole, Dickinson, Fitzpatrick , McClung, Minnick None The motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 7:00 P. M. I • • - •• I . CALL TO ORDER. • • • URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY MARCH 2, 1983 5 r The regular meeting of the Englewood Urb an Renewal Authorit y was called to order at 5:40 P. M. by Vice-Chairman R. P. McClung. Members present: Voth, Dickinson, Fitzpatrick , McClung, Minnick, Nov icky Powers, Exe cut ive Director Van Dyke, Alternate Member Me mb e r s absent : Cole Also present: City Manager McCown EDDA Board Member John Maxwell URA Counsel Paul C. Benedetti II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Vice-Chairman McClung stated that the Minutes of February 2, 1983, were to be considered for approval. Minnick moved: Fitzp trick econd d: The Minutes of February 2, 1983, b approved as written. AYES: Dickinson, Fitzpatrick, McClung , Minnick, Novicky, Voth NAYS: one ABSENT: Col Th otion carried. Ill. Vic -Ch irman McClung stat d that h would nt rtain n minati na for th po ition of Chairman. Mr. Fitzp trick n min t d Hr. Rob rt \oth a th no inati n. r. l t&p rl It, Clun , Hi tl n rrt n. Hr. Minnick a cond d • Minnie ? c:l d. y , oth I • • • • - -2- Mr. Robert Voth was elected Chairman by written ballot. Mr. Voth assumed the position of Chairman, and called for nominations for the position of Vice-Chairman . Mr. Fitzpat rick nominated Mr. R. P. McClung as Vice-Chairman; Mr. Novicky seconded the nomination. Mr. Dickinson nominated Mrs. Ruth Cole as Vice-chairman of the Authority; Mr. Fitzpat rick seconded the nomination. Mr. Voth asked if there were further nominations for Vice-Chairman? Fitzpatrick moved: McClung seconded: The nominations for Vice-Chairman be closed. AYES: Fitzpatrick, McClung, Minnick, Novicky, Voth, Dickinson NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole The mot ion carried. Mr. R. P. McClung wa s lected Vice-Chairman by written ballot. IV. APPOINTMENT OF EXECUTIVE SECRETARY. Chairman Voth stat d that the Authority needs to appoint n Ex cutive Seer tary for th comin y ar . Minnick mov d: McCluna cond d: Th Englewood Urb n R newal Authority r appoint Ms. Su n Pow r s Ex c utlv S c r tary for 1983. AYES: McClung, Minnick , Novicky , Voth , Dickin on, Fitzpatrick AYS: on BSE "T: Col Th motion carr! d. RY. rn r Prop rtY, 37 7 South Clark on Str t. 3787 bru ry thf I • • • -3- Ms. Powers stated that the site at Union Avenue and South Washington Street is back on the market, and that an offer will be made to acquire the prop- erty so that the house at 3787 South Clarkson Street can be relocated. Ms. Powers stated that if this site is acquired, a side-yard variance will have to be requested to accommodate this house on the lot. Ms. Powers discussed the process by which the lot will be purchased and the house relocated. It is estimated that this house, located at East Union Avenue and South Washington Street, could be marketed for $90,000+. Ms. Powers stated that the side ya rd variance would be considered by the Board of Adjustment and Appeals in April. VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS. Ms. Powers stated that the tenants of 3767 South Clarkson Street had i n itially requested the payment of the relocation benefits by March 15th to enable them to close on the purchase of another home ; however, in a telephone conversation on March 1st, Mr. Ess linger notified Ms. Powers that the purchase of the house had fallen through, and they would not need the $2,500 to close the purchase. The tenants will be vacating the premises at the end of the month, and would still like to receive the relocation benefits prior to their move. Ms. Powers stated that she would hav to r commend again t payment of reloca- tion benefits prior to th ten nts' move. Mr. Fitzpatrick s tated that he would trongly oppose payment of r location ben fit until after the tenants have moved, and an a essment is mad on th condition of the premises. Di cu sion ensued. Fitzpatrick mov d: HcClun second d: No relocation b n fit be p id until 3767 South Clark on S re t an nt on th condition of th AYES: innfck, Novicky, Voth, Dickinbon , Fitzp trick, McClun AYS: on ABSE T: Col Tit .a ion c rri d. Vll. th Aut o ity h uld writ b n ita uld b p y bl a 1 tt r atatinA that a iv n to th · t n nta t auch tl r lo t1 on tr t. • • • • -4- Hr . Haviland stated that he and a co uple of the board members had me t with former Urban Renewal Authority Chairman Powell and Vice-Chairman McClung, and had discuss d the matter of relocation benefits. Concerns were expressed to Mr . Hinson , Economic Development Planner, and Mr . Hinson suggested that these concerns b et out in writing and s ubmitted for consideration by the Authority. Mr. Haviland at d that the EDDA has submitted a draft of the th y w u l d lik to see addressed , and noted that wh ile the r l oca i on u ines , they do have some concern with the EDDA do not want to see unreasonable hardships n n that have to relocate. Mr. Haviland stated t EDOA , chaired by Mr . Pe ndleton , surveyed what don in the way of relocation benefits and drafted and uggestions from t his s urvey . Mr . Haviland askin the Urban Re ne wal Au thority to review th and uggestions. Mr. Voth s tated that Authority members looked at the proposed Relocation Policy at the last meeting, but have not come to any conclusions. Mr. McClung st ated that he did not see a need to change what has been established, and that the proposed Relocation Handbook drafted by the staff would spell out relocation benefits in detail. Mr. Voth questioned how the EDDA arrived at the proposed $2,500 paym nt to establi hments going out of busin s rather than r locating. Mr. Havil nd tated that this provision is in the Boulder R location Plan. Mr. Paul Bened tti stated that thi in th F "qu lify h t would pr bu In s, nd p ning? 1 • n occurrence. nd wa s a th bu 'i- 1f it 1 go out of v ry re- This froa ace ptin& th pay- w y or round h nothing to • • • - -5- Mr. Gordon Close of the EDDA entered the meeting. Further discussion ensued. Mr. Dickinson stated that as the Plan is written, if a business doe s not want to relocate, they are paid nothing. Ms. Powers pointed out that if a building is being taken for the redevelopment program, the occupying business will have to be moved somewhere. Mr. Dickinson sta t ed that at the present time, if the establishment is going out of busi- ness, they would receive nothing . Mr. Voth stated that this would be a matter to be determined by th Authority. Mr. Voth asked if there were further que tions on the proposed relocation policy ? Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that ther are ev ral points of discussion and question s that could have ramification s on the progra ; he stated that he felt these wil l have to be considered further b for any det rminations are made. Mr. Voth stated that a Relocation Handbook ha been drafted by the staff, and that copies are available for th EDDA Board. H stated that the Au- thority will be reviewing this proposed Handbook, and asked that the EDDA Board also go through it and submit comments to th staff. Mr. Dickinson asked what th EDDA had in mind on "business rental assistance"; he sked what the rational is b hind this s uggestion when a business would already hav received moving/relocation benefit . Mr. Haviland stated that busin ss may have a very favorable rent rate in its presPnt location; the relocation benefits would only help on the e xpenses incurred i n moving to anoth r location, and that the new location may b at a much higher rent rate; th bu in ss rental a saL tance would be for a given period of tim to "help bridg the gap" until th busines is tablished in the n w location. Mr. P ndleton q a cd that EDDA f lt the busin ss wlth a long-term 1 ase at c had to h v o con ideration in addition to th r - ~lr. Hnvlland stat d th t th EDDA has tri d to look at ~r. McClung xpre sed th opinion that this would ym nt, h t the Authority i not in th ch rity bu in s , no think th ffort to r build w rr nt thi con id ration. • I . • • • -6- "fashion" to pay relocation benefits, however. Ms. Powers pointed out that the average relocation payment in Boulder was $15 ,000; this was "actual reasonable cost" average. Mr. Benedetti suggested that a survey be done of businesses/individuals who would be displaced, and make an estimate of the expenses to relocate these displacees. Ms. Powers stated that a survey had not been done of the businesses and individuals that the Urban Renewal Authority would be responsible to re- locate . Property owners/businessmen on South Acoma Street are not included in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan, and the Authority is n ot responsible for re- locating these businesses unless the Plan is amended. Mr. Minnick stated that he felt it must be kept in mind that each business and property owner will have individual needs; they will be getting fair market value for the property purchased by the Authority. He acknowledged that there are some elderly residents within the redevelopment area that the Authority will have to deal with. Mr. Haviland stated that in looking over urban renewal plans, it seems to him that a lot of attention is given to residential relocation, but little to business relocation. Mr. Haviland stated that he feels the residential relocation in the Englewood Redevelopment Plan i being handled very well, but it is his feeling, and that of the EDDA board, that the business reloca- tion b nefits should b strength n d. He stated that h feels the wording on the maximum amount of benefit for busine r location is confusing. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that he is of the opinion that mo t of the urban re- newal plans have dealt with blighted nd th t mo t of them have been residential d v lopments rather than bu ar a • Mr. Fitzpatrick noted that this red velopm nt proj ct in En 1 d al with v ry few residences and mo tly with th busines community. ~r. Fitzpatrick tared that the Authorit has tried to take the bu in c -.unit v into consideration. Mr. P ndleton not d that whenever a figure i s c it d in a report, lt becomes th "maximum", as it ha in this in s t n Mr. V tl k d if t t r w r i t zp tri c k aoved: Clung & Dtckin on c ond d: r - relocat d ntation. H uid lin to th taff; and that urth r u t i n 7 Authority snd buain s a - of th bu in a r loc atio n th a u tion ovl ky , V th, Di in n, itz tr! lun , H nnlck Col t t n r r i • y I • • • • -7- C. Consultation with EDDA. Hs. Powers stated that at the last meeting, the Authority passed a resolution pertaining to the acquisition of 3601 South Logan Street, and directed the staff to notify the EDDA of the efforts expended to acquire the property and the possible use of eminent domain. Ms. Powers stated that Mr. Haviland wanted to discuss the term "consult" with EDDA as set forth in the Tri-Party Agreement. Ms. Powers stated that the EDDA is aware that the properties set forth in the Plan are covered in the Tri-Party Agreement. Mr. Haviland stated that the EDDA has a regular hoard meet ing scheduled for March 9th; he didn 't know whether board action was being requested . Mr. Voth stated that the letter wa s only to make the EDDA members aware of the possible use of eminent domain; he also s uggested that 'possibly someone on the EDDA board might know the property owner or know some pertinent informa- tion that would be of assistance to the Urba n Renewal Authority before the determination to use eminent domain i s made. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the Authority felt that anytime the possible use of eminent domain arose that the EDDA s hould be mad e aware of it . Mr. Voth s tated that the Ur ban Renewal wants to keep the "mechanism working", and noted that when acquisition of property in the downtown area occurs, the EDDA could be invaluable to the Authority. He stated that the Authority feels the EDDA Board should know what is going on , and that if member of the EDDA Board have some insight the Urban Renewal Authority would like to know about it. A. R location Handbook. Ms. Powers st ted that the intent with th Relocation Handbook is to expand on th Relocation Plan as contain d in the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Ms. Pow r not d th t this is the fir t dr ft of the R location Handbook, and the staff would like to hav o thing formaliz d within a month, if po sib! Mr. Voth que. tlon d th wording In f2A, wher in it i would control fn any inst nc of d viation fro th R th t he f lt th R loc tion Pl n would hav b point d out that th Relo ~ tlon Plan 1 Plan (Downtown R d velopment Plan). Mr. fed thi • H ndbook Urban Renewal lt I • • • • - -8- Ms . Powers stated that she felt §2 0 , Utilities a nd Outdoor Advertising Dis- ~. could possibly be placed somewhere else i n the Plan . Mr . Novicky stated that he felt this sec tion wa s repetjtious. Mr. Benedett i stated that he had incl ud ed this pa rt icular provision i n th e Boulder Urban Renewa l Handbook , and discussed problems that might be experienced by an author ity having to pay for relocation of utility lines or billboard s . He stated he felt it is important to state very clearly that these two uses are not eligible for relocation benefits. Mr . Haviland asked whether payment could be expected for a business that required special wiring i nto the bu ilding to accommodate th e use . Mr. Benedetti stated that this is not what is me ant by "public ut ili t ies ", that what Mr. Haviland is describing would be considered ''process util ities ." Public utilities would be relocation of buried telephone cables, Public Service lines, etc. Ms. Powers dis c us sed the "definit ion s " set forth in the Relocation Handbook, noting that a def i n ition of home occupation has been incl uded in the definition of "business". ~lr. McClung stated that he under s tood the purpose of Urban Renewal is to acquire land for redevelopment. Mr. ~tcClung stated that he felt it shou ld be made clear there is a diff renee in acquiring the "ground" and the "im- provements " on the land. He did not fe 1 that appraisers should bulk the valu of the land and the improvem nt into one appraisal. H noted that after a structure has been in existence 50 years , it is depreciated out and of no value ; only the land would b of value. Discu ion ensued. ~lr. Bened tti stated that when the Urban Ren w 1 Authority acquired property, the real property includes improvem nt s that are p rm nent on that site ; the dirt cannot be considered separately from the brick. and mortar, and that the Authority would be acting improperly to ttempt to separate th v lue of the two. Mr. Benedetti did advoc te a li tin of all r al prop- erty that is included in the appr is 1 of a sit ; this would cl rify what is con id r d "r al prop rty" v . "p r on 1 prop rt " th t may b cl im d by the individual or busin s being di pl c d. 01 cu r. Voth ugg t d that thf might b fu rth r. pont Mr. n d tti coul d look into clari J d I • • • - -8- Ms . Powers st ated that she felt §2D, Utilities and Outdoor Advertising Dis- ~. could possibly be placed somewhere else in the Plan. Mr. Novicky stated that he felt this section was repetitious. Mr. Benedetti stated that he had included this particular provision in the Boulder Urban Renewal Handbook, and discussed problems that might be experienced by an authority having to pay for relocation of utility lines or billboards. He stated he felt it is important to state very clearly that these two uses are not eligible for relocation benefits. Mr. Haviland asked whether payment could be expected for a business that required special wiring into the building to accommodate the use. Mr. Benedetti stated that this is not what is meant by "publ ic utiliti es ", that what Mr. Haviland is describing would be considered "proces s utilities." Public utilities would be relocation of buried telephone cables, Public Service lines, etc. Is. Powers discussed the "definitions" set forth in the Relocation Handbook, noting that a definition of home occupation has been incl uded i n the definition of "business". Mr. McClung stated that he understood the purpose of Urban Renewal is to acquire land for redevelopment. Mr. McClung stated that he felt it should be made clear there is a difference in acquiring the "ground" and the "im- provements " on the land. He did not feel that appraisers should bulk the value of the land and the improvem nts into one appraisal. He noted that after a structure has been in existence SO years , it is depreciated out and of no value; only the land would be of valu . Discus ion ensu d. lr. Benedetti stat d that when the Urban Ren wal Authority cquired property, the real prop rty include improvements that p rmanent on that ite; th dirt c nnot be consid red separat lv fr m bricks and mortar, and that the Authority would b cting improp rly ttempt to eparate the valu of th two. Mr. B ned tti did dvoc t listing of 11 real prop- rty that 1 includ d in apprai al of sit ; this would cl rify what i consider d "r al prop rt y " vs. "p r ... onal prop rty" th t mav b claim d bv th Individual or bu~in s. b ing di pl c d. Di cu ion n u d. r. Voth . u g ted that this might b furchcr. It bv point lr. llt!n d ttl could look into 1 rl 1 d • I • ( • • • -9- been used in determining payment in such cases. Ms. Powers stated that the Plan is so written that both businesses would be eligible for payment. Mr. Novicky questioned §4C on Page 7, and asked where a staff member had been designated to establish eligibility for relocation payments. Ms. Powers stated that this section will authorize the Authority to so designate a staff member; ~he did point out, however, that the Authority would make the decision on what the payment is. Ms. Powers discussed §4F, Multiple Occupants of One Acquired Dwelli~, and suggested that possibly this section could be expanded to include businesses. Mr. Dickinson expressed concern whether this section could be interpreted that two occupants of a unit could both receive the maximum relocation benefit. Discussion ensued. Ms. Powers suggested that "up to the maximum amount" should be added to this section. Mr . Dickinson asked whether residents with code violations --such as running a business from the home --would be eligible for relocation benefits. He asked if they would be eligible for relocation benefits as a resident, and as a business also? Mr. Benedetti suggested adding a statement that a "family would be eligibl for one payment on the submission of qualifying statement s ." Also , Mr. Bened tti suggested adding a statement that "if an occupant is in violation of city codes, they would not be eligible for relocation benefits." Mr. McClung asked if §4P referred to r imbursement based on the monthly rent on a month-to-month basis. Ms. Powers stated that the relocation b nefits are based on the monthly payments for a on $2 ,500. it is inc alw y •xc lnt nt of th y ar period, up to a maximum of from the Relocation Plan a 9 and 10 need to be reworded pa nt for one ye r would ask d if it w s th on relocation ben fits? h v ." . Pow r not ant to r • r n • di - w uld I . • • • -10- Mr. Voth sta t ed that he feels this entire section needs to b e re-examined . Discussion e n s ue d. Ms. Powers stated that on Page 11, §6A, second line, "or th e City " should be removed. Mr. Mc Cown di sc ussed his concern with "sel f-moves", noting that it is s tated that payment would be made on the lowest acceptable bid or estimate received by the displacee. He stated that he had problems suggesting that bids s hould be solicited when the displacee has no intention of using the moving company for the actual move. He suggested that the Authority might be better off es- tablishing a standard price or contract with a moving company to submit the bids. Mr. McClung stated that he felt there are any number of moving companies who would give bids or estimate s free of c harge, and that this is part of the moving business. Ms. Powers asked wha t the Authority felt about having a specific company --similar to a specific appraiser; if the tenant or dis- placee was not satisfied with the estimate given to relocate, they could ob- tain their own bids or estimates. Discussion ensued. Mr. Fitzpatrick que s tioned what legal problems might occur i f only one estimate obtained by the Authority were to be used. Mr. Dickin s on asked if there were some way the Authority c ould work with on or two moving companies to give the dis - placed persons and business es a good rate. Mr. Fitzpatrick also que s tioned who would pay for the estimates? Mr . McCo wn s tated that he has suggested s vera! possible wa ys of a ssisting owner s and tenant s who are r elocated to Mr. Haviland; h f lt that po ssibly the EDDA co uld assist i n making s ur the tructure the busin ss is moving to is s afe , etc. He sta t d that h f lt this and oth r erv ic b could b pro- vided by the EDDA in support of th r loc tion effort . Mr. Fitzpa t rick a k d if the Authorit did h1r a moving compan y t o glv es timates what ramification th Authority could xp ct fro• this? Mr. Bened tti stated th t h f It th Authority h d th di cr tion to do thi , it would b on "con ultfng b th ppr i r nd n o iator . Th law stat s th t th uth rily 11u t not b "arbltr ry d c priciou ." in their action . Ms . Power k d i thi .. tl r c ould b di cu on March 9th ? Hr. p nd th 1 n • EDDA bo rd ting In 11 ibl lr u ntly 11 I . -• • • -11- Ms. Powers stated that this was a good point, and suggested that storage expen ses be removed from Ineligible Expenses , or a time limitation be placed on it. Ms. Powers stated that Section 8 is Appeals, and sets forth the procedure for filing an appeal. Mr. Voth expressed concern on the wording of §8F, Page 14. Ms. Powers stated that the staf f would be responsible to review the claim and make the determination on whether lt is eligible for relocation benefits. Mr. Benedetti stated that the appeal must be filed within 30 days after the applicant has been notified of ineligible expenses. Mr. Dickinson asked if appeals would be made to a sub-committee of the Authority, or to the Authority as a whole? He stated that he felt there would be a lot of appeals; and special meetings to hear the appeals. He advocated a special sub-committee to hear the appeals, and going to the full Board as a last resort. Mr. Benedett i pointed out that if someone is asking for a waiver of a time period , only the entire Authority could grant it; he further stated that he did not feel there would be that many appeals. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that he felt Mr. Dickinson's suggestion would entail setting up another quasi-judicial body, and that he felt a lot of problems could result. Mr. Voth stated that if there are a lot of appeals filed, a specific date would have to be set to hear the appeals. Discussion nsued. Mr. Dickinson asked lf th "D terminations Final" section on Page 16 meant the applicant cannot furth r app al to the courts? Hr. Benedetti st ted that this section does not pr clud an applicant app sling to the Courts. Ms. Powers stated that the rem inder of the Handbook is Appendix m terial. Sh stated that the st ff ne d som dir ction from th Authority on pro- ceeding with the d v lopment of th Handbook. Hr. Fitzpatrick this m t lng be to the s ctions ubmi t d to th that h would lik or It 1 1 r, •• tin of th .e tins OA b n di cu sed t Authorit 1 April th; ahould b called on March nd not d th ed th T E~ cutiv a ion. TARY tr c. • I • • • - -12- The motion carried. * * * * * * * * Dickinson moved: Fitzpatrick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority come out of Executive Session. AYES: Dickinson, Fitzpatrick, McClung, Minnick, Novicky, Voth NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole The motion carried. Fitzpatrick moved: Minnick seconded: The Urban Renewal Authority adopt Resolution 113, Series of 1983, entitled: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OR CONDEMNATION OF THE FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN CERTAIN LAND IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD BY ENGLEWOOD URBAN .RENEWAL AUTHORITY FOR LITTLE DRY CREEK IMPROVEMENTS AND CARRYING OUT THE ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. AYES: Dickinson, Fitzpatrick, McClung, Minnick, Novicky, Voth NAYS: None ABSENT: Cole The motion carried. Mr. Novicky asked if the Urban Renewal Authority h d amended the Bylaws to deal attendance policy? Ms. Pow rs stated th t the Bylaws have not to set forth such policy. Mr. ovicky stated that he would th staff dr w up an mendment to th Bylaw regarding attendance ting . Discus ion nsu d. Mr. McCown not d that th City Council r c qu rterly att ndanc r cord of th Boards and Coa- Th sions , nd that if poor att ndanc • mb r is called in to this with th City Council. th t th att ndanc records hould 1 c ina adjourn d :55 P. M. xplained to p ople nd c issions; he d his attendance at o f the State Sta ute ab r froa office. I . L. CALL '10 OIWEH . • • - UIUlAN IU,NEWAL AUTIIOIUTY MARCH 23, 1983 The Special Meeting of the Urban Renewal Authority was called to o rd~r by Chairman Robert J. Voth at 5:30 P . M. Members present: Fitzpatrick, Minnick, Novicky , Voth, Cole, Dickinson Po wers , Executive Director Membe r s absent: McClung Also present: Susan Van Dyke, Alternate Member W111. HI ('h:t rd IIi 11 ~:u n, E<·onuud (' Dl 'Vt lopua·11 t I' l.tlllll'l Al VanDemark, Technical Services Superv isur -lluus lng Jim Harm of the office of Benedetti & Brinn :·Is. Powers introduced Mr. Jim Harm and Mr. Al VanDemark to members of the Authority. IT. 3787 South Clarkson Street Cunt7a-ct for Helocall.on Resolution #4 , 1983 :·Is . Powe:rs stated that Mr. Harm has work d on th draft of the contract with Ryberg Construction Company for th r location of the house ul 1787 Sou t h Cla rk on Street . Mr. VanD m rk of th Housln Division h s be~n ln- volvl·d wirh the discussions on r Joe lion of th hous , ami on ;1kln1: ,.,tl- alcs for lh • costs involved in reloc tion and r h b of th • stru tun onn• It on t h ~ n w 1 t th t that sh had quoted s~ver 1 • high~.-Lh.m th•• r ltl.'llls on nd I ylH:rg Cun~ot ruct i.un tin ; it 11 his to th Authority, and d joh. H . Pow~r~ und d ~·01 • I I t I'"' ll the requir ~ents I • • • -2- creas e the p r o p osed r e l ocation estimate by $800 , the cost includ e d f o r demolition o f the stru c tur e . Ms . Powers d i scus s e d probl e ms with th e wat e r lin e on the proposed new site and for the s ite to the south. Th ese pro p rt ies we re, at one time, un der on e owne r s h i p but wer e e ventually sold t o separa te owners. The water lin e to serve th e hou se on th e s i te s outh o f th e pro posed relocation site run s across the si t e optioned by the Urban Re n e wal Auth o rity, which is unaccept- able t o the Util i ties Depa rtment. The Urban Re n ewa l Authority canno t gain clear titl e to th e site until this wat e r l in e is r e located and wat e r ser vice to both s ites is provid ed from the stre et. An estimate to relocat e the wa t er line f o r th e south pro pe rty has been inc luded in the estimated c os t s f o r r elocation ; h owev e r, th e purc hase price on th e n ew s ite would be r e du ced by a n equal a mo unt . Ms . Po wers state d that she a nd Mr. Dennis Orr, r ea l es t a t e b r ok e r wh o wo r ks with Ryberg Con s truct i o n, have met with th e r esi- de n ts of t he 47 00 Sou t h Wa s hington Str eet addr ess t o discuss the s itu ation . Ms . Powe r s sta t ed tha t a n o the r proble m that has ar i s en with the r elocation o f t h e s t ruct ur e i s tha t t he hou se t o the south of t he optioned s ite has th e s t reet a dd r ess of 4700 Sou th Wa shin g t on St r eet , but is not th e corner pr operty. This would necessitat e a change of address f o r that p r ope r t y . A variance for total sideya r d wou ld have to be requ s t ed from th e Board o f Adj u s t ment and Appeal s to loca t e t h e house at 3787 So uth Clarkson Street o n the site at Sou t h Washington Stre t a nd East Union Avenue. This al so has been discussed with the property own e r t 4700 South Washington, and they hav e sta t ed tha t they would su p po rt t h va r iance r e quest. Mr. innick ask d if th e Auth o rit y could us th e xis t i ng wat e r t ap? Powers s t t e d that th tap tha t is th r is a ss i gned t o th e prope rty ad- dr s s d a 4 70 0 So uth W shington Str L , 'Is . pq w r a th n r vi d th provision s c ant in d in th e pro pos d c ontrac t. M. Pc.w r s Str t will nd f t l o Ma . P w rs s tat d h t the are t he on l o p ny wlaich wi l l p rovid 8 t t ar n d d, nd th h is th r on l h a t r 1 ndina c n t r ac t with th m. • I • • • - -:J- trees and shrubs that could be moved Lu Lh e new >;iLe wl1 Lch Colli d t·u L dllwll on the landscaping expenses . Nr . Dickinson exp r essed h'is d ·isplensure thaL tile prupt·rly IIWllt•r w:~,; i'l",Jllll'cl pt<rmi>;siun to take some of Lhe trees on the >;ite . li e >;LuLeu LhaL in Lhe fu ture he wan ted to be notified of such matters prior to permission being given to the prop e rty owner. Mr. Fitzpat r ick asked whaL estlmale we were looking .JL 011 i<JlldM ·apLllt,'l M,;. Po wers stated that she didn't know; this ha s not been bid ouL , but will be done as part of the rehab work. Mr . Harm s tated that he has had experience wher e p r oper ty owners wanted cash for trees planted on their property; the appraisals are done on real prope rty, and trees have v e ry little value. Ms . Powers sta ted that bids will be taken on the detention pond in a few weeks , so the proposed co ntract doesn't call for a lot of work lo be don on the 3787 South Clarkson site by Ryberg Construction . The site will have to be fenced off to prevent access by the publ ic. Items to be done on the new site were delineated in Exhibit 3 attached to the Contract. Dollar amounts have been assigned to the~;e iLcrus. Ns. l'owt·r; asked Mr . V nDemark to discuss items such as escape windows in Lilt· l>asc•IJJl'lll of the bLructure aL the new site. Mr . VanDemark sLalcd Lh.Jl any huscmenl room used for sleeping purposes must have on escap window. Ms . Powers proceeded in the review of the contract nd dellnealed work items . It was noted that if th garage on th new sit is moved by the prope rty owners at 4700 South Washington Stre t, this would 1 av a con- crete slab to be remov d; M . Pow rs sked Mr . V nD rk if h could give an estimat" on the cost of this remov 1? Mr. VanDemark slatt•<l that ht• wu11ld not antit:ipate any chu r11c fur remov l of the slab. rl atwurk, purcheb .Jnd hlC(> were '<m:.itle r ed. Mr. unUt:ui.Jrk >.L.llt•d Ll.,·n · would b• 25 f t of caner L sld w lk from t h prop rty lin Into tht ho u •; lhrt•t l p. ou'd huvl' lo hl' t:un~;tructcd lo lilt punh, .md ll" rc· rc two p rclws requiring two Sl!t of st ps. A r iling may h v to b.., , ut round th~ front porc·h to me t C'ude r quirC'mt•nlH. in th at 3787 South Cl rkaon ti t I IUbmttt rk, nd found to b llou1ing Dlviaion, Ill • I • • • • -4- surance, or if the Authority is charged for the insurance. Ms . Powers stated that the contractor does carry insurance and it is not a responsibilit y of the Urban Renewal Authority. Ms. Powers stated that the staff does feel the contractor is providing special services under the proposed contract . Mr. Dickinson asked about penalties to be imposed on the co ntractor in the event the work is not completed? Ms . Powers stated that ther e is a provision for $100/day penalty. Ms . Cole asked if work could begin on this project any time soon? Ms. Powers stated that nothing can begin until the variance is pursued through the Board of Adjustment and Appeals on April 13th. Ms. Powers then r eviewed the pro- jected time table for this project, and noted that the residents at 4700 South Washington Street will have two or three weeks to remove the garage if it is determined to allow them to have it. Mr. Dickonson asked about liability on the removal of the garage? Ms. Powers noted that all property of the URA is covered by t City 's insurance policies , but stated that she was not sure whether it would extend to som ething lik this. Mr. Novicky stated that if he understood correctly, the rehab work is not includ ed in the es timat~d cos t of $33 ,470 t o relocate the structure. He asked if the chimney woul d be replaced ? Ms. Pow~rs noted that there i s n o fireplace in the house, and the chimney is being removed because it is not structurally sound. Mr. VanD mark stated that rehab of th e s truc ture coul d begin as soon as it is locat d on the new site . Mr. VanDem rk discussed the method of payment to contractors that th !lousing Division follow">. Mr. VanDemark noted that he usually tri s t~ hold th disbursement (payment) o three on each job, n d that not mor than 80 % of the value of the wo rk atisfactorily compl t ed is r le d at any n tim . On any dillburseml·nt that is mad , lien wa l.v rs ar r quir d from all sub-contractor s involved. Mr . V nD mark stat J on a normal r hab job, th compl tlon tim 1 90 days, on this proj ct , h f lt it could hl· don within 45 days . r. cod Mr. r. V w uld b th structure up t o b ? . Pow r e a k d n a of the work th t 1 1 r irin of th h 1 , whi ch ia r q•1ir d , unr al." • • • • • _,,_ Mr. Di c kinson s tated that he didn't think hou s e movin g ""'"''""''''''"' """lvd to get i n to , and that he is "dead set against it ." Mr . Voth noted that if the house is put on the mark c L u n Ll w p rc•fH•lll •; i It•, lL '""Y nuL Ia: s ulu anu rclucaL<.:d in Lim<.: Lu IJt·gin Lh l· ,.,,,s lro l'Lio" "" l.itll c· Dr y Creek and the Detention Pond. Mr. Dickinson stated that if the structure was sold from th e present site , "we would be through with all of this." lie noted th;~L if llll · v ;11·i:111<'<' for sideyards was not granL<::d, "we art: righL back Lo tlot• bt:ginnin~." Ms . Powers stated that the Authority has discussed the reloc-ation of this house and some of the houses that will be acquired un SouL II f1 ;11111uck ~it reeL, and she unders toad that this was what the Authority wanted done . Ms . l'owers stated that an alternative to relocating the house would be to sell it to the Englewood Housing Authority and let them rclocat<• It; hut ;~ny rt •<'<Hlpi"l ', of funds would be extremely llmiLud. Hr. Fitzpatrick reviewed Exhibit 2 of the Contract , which sets forth some of the required rehabilitation work. He asked for an e s timate on th e pl umhlnt\ work to be done. Mr . VanDemark estimated this would be $40 0 , lleating wor k, including duct work, installation of new gas line, vent i n g , t c ., wa; esti - mated at $800 . Mr. VanDemark estimated that the land capln for th n l·w site could he as high as $5,000; lf trees and s hrub s fr u tlw C l n rk so n Street s ite can be relocat d, and the landscapin g i H ~>tr i< tl y suth li n 1•, It,• estimated $3,000, Construction of a stairway to th b sement was estimat d to c o t $50 0 . C',lS line and hook-ups to a barbeque pit to b salvaged from Lhc Clarkson S lrn•L Site was estimated at $200 . Miscellaneous exp ns w r estimated at $40 0 . Railings around the front porch w r estim t d at $150. :-l r. Fitzpa trick st ted th t including th stimated for reh bilil atlun nd th f for th real stat brok r, the total co t for r Joe ting th e hous e cou ld b as much s $70,000. M • Powers stat d that two s timat cs on t he •l llng prJ.c of the hous one tt i reloc t d w rc for $105,000 .mtl $9 5 ,000 . .lr. No v cky a sk d if any figures w r vaU bl on the toxe rca llzctl f r urn kl·cp ln g thl H Htruc turc locat e d ln l'nuh·wuud, c&tim t d t ha t t h t x ua pay bl e to th City on this hou a loca t d ul d b abou t 90 p e r y r. th t ould b Hr. l'i llql alrl c k Furth r brl f dlacu Lon r n u d . l1nn1ck ,;ov1cky y 'AY ABSE v d : o n d d : r r 1 vi lty, Voth, on it 1 r - dopt R olution 14, s A RESOLUTION 0 1'11 P. URBA Rl. I' lNTO A CO TRACT W 1111 1111. RYUP.R I! CO - ANY 0 RELOCATION OF TilE U A.N RP. J.WAl. HOUSE AT 3787 OUTII Cl.A 0 STRI I'T . 1 apatr1 It • I • • • • • -6- Ill. RELOCATION HANDBOOK. Mr. Voth welcomed members of the EDDA who were present: Messrs. Maxwell, Kaufman, Close , Pendleton, and Director Mike Haviland. Mr . Voth asked for an up-date from the EDDA on the Relocation Handbook and any concerns that they may have following their review of the Ha nd book . Mr. Haviland stated that Mr. Pendleton is chairman of the ad hoc committee on relocation, and he wou ld defer to Mr. Pendleton. Mr. Pendleton referred to a memorandum from Ms. Powers outlining concerns that had been voiced at th e me ting of March 2, 1983, and setting forth proposed alternatives. Mr. Pendleton r e ferred to Page 4 of this memorandum , which sets forth proposed alternatives o n r location benefits. He suggested that the EDDA has no comment on th propo sed benefits for r sidential relo- cation; how ver, they do fe el that the propo sed supplemental payment to a business displacee is inadequat~. Mr. Pendleton stated that they would sug- gest $10,000 maximum unl~ss ~peci.tl ~rcum s tances warrant an exception. Mr . Pendleton stated th at the EDDA woul d also urge the Authority to include lease-hold improvements made by t nants in evaluating the cost of moving and relocation benefits. Ms. Pow rs asked if this propo d $10,0(10 payment would be over and above the cost of the actual move and obsol tc property allowance? Mr. Pendleton stated that the propos d $10 ,000 ~aximu would he ov r and above the actual move cost and the ohsolet~ property all0wance. Mr. Haviland stat d that the EDDA felt the proposed su pplem ntal paym nt as s t forth in th m morandum wa~ a po itivc step in the ri ht dir ction , but that memb rs w~r not su re just what l s covered by th suppl mental paym nt. Mr. HinRon tat d that the suppl mental payme nt w s propos d as a fixed sum to be paid t o busl n sse that are relocat d, and would over incid nt 1 s, Mr. Havil nd tat d that this could h us d t o cov r 1 m nts, if h und r ood correctly. Mr. Hinson a t d rcl ocdtlon b n fit. to business s au gest d by th t of th move plus th $2 ,000 upplem nt 1 p yment. Mr. h • EDDA dld not r altz thi s upple ntal p ym nt w r. llin on stated th t this proposal is 1110d 1 d on r. Ham point d out th r loc m. r. 8 n t ln • I . ( • • - -7- doing w~ll nnd wanted tu r ema in i n Lilt· area'! li e askc·d if Lll t·r" ·,J,.,uld "" be some .;a rt of "reward" to a business that i s doin g well and that i ! wanlt·d to remain in the ar a to help pay off th e bonds? Mr . llarm s t aled ll~ott Lhl' Boulder Urba n Henewal Authority did try t o keep the bus in c•ssc•s in ll uu ldt •r, l•u l diu nt.t nt·< ~"""rl l y try Lu ke~p Lh '"' wi Lit in tltt· l;,x ill<"tt 'lltl'lll .11 ". 11,. s tat ed that he was not aware of any special payment made to an y of th~ busincs ,.,., Mr . Close stated that he "is really confused on the und e r s tandin g o f this Board." lie pointed out that hi s business will be L<tkt•n hct:.tu :-a · of Llll · l.i lt lt· Dry Creek improvements, but e ven though the structure will be La k en it i s not delineated in the Urban Renewal Plan a nd he would not r ecei v e any r elut.t - tion benefit s by having t o mo v e . Mr . Pe ndleton point ed uul Lltitl Mr . Clu:a· has added considerable value to the building by improvement s made• Lo nc- commo date the nature of his business. >t r. Fitzpatrick stated that he "gets the feeling thnl n o '""l'l<•r who nh t.tin :; Lh~ property, you wanL Lhe Urban l<cncwnl Authority Lu pny lhc lwnef It;;"; J.; this correct? ~l r. Fit zpatrick pointed out that th e Authority has no re sponsi- bility to pay relocation benefits to properties that are not acquired by th~ Au thority; those that are acquired by the redeveloper on th e private market woul d not receive relocation benefits from the Urban Renewal Authority, Mr . Pendl ton s tated that the EDDA would urge the Auth o rity to s tay flexible on the matter of the relocation benefits, with no concrete ceiling on hcnl'- fit s , a nd not La say th e r e will be• n o consid e ration t:Iven to lenst•-lio l d busin~sscs , 'Jr . Voth sta t ~d that h did not feel there was any th ing discussed al Lith meeting which could not be met by the existing relocation plan. lie did point out that the Authority cannot help p ople that are not relocated by Aut ho rit y action. Mr. Pendleton agreed that if business is bought out by th rc - UC!v leper, it would be a case of "wi lling buyer and a willing Neller," ... nd would not be the responsibility of th e Authority. :·Jr . Fit zpatrick t ted that he f cl the Relocation llandbook Ha ys cx.tctly wh t the Authority wanted it to 11 y, nd the only chang h would wa nt tu cons d ·r La if om one i s reloc t d nd h to p y higher rent at th e n~w loc · ti n ther should b om compensation for th differ nee in rent pay-ments. loe t1on Pl n i d f1nit amount of v 11 bl~· to h lp thow point d ouL th t the Authority all tll•.pl.lll'l ''>, ll liLlY xp nwea th di plac • ia up to th diwer t1on of th• " x t would w rrant omp n11 tion. • I . • • - -8- Mr. Close noted that the tenants/property owners along the west side of South Acoma Street in the 3400 block are aware that their properties will have to be acquired one way or another; he ask d what would happen if a tenant mo ved on his own, and this area was lat r included in the relocation plan; how would the Authority address this situation? He noted that a tenant that moved ahead of time would lose the support of the Authority and receive no relocation benefits. Ms . Powers stated that if the property is listed in the Plan it is con- sidered by one standard; if it is not listed in the Plan , she stated that she was not sure how the Authority would deal with this matter. Ms . Powers stated that the properties on the west side of the 3400 block South Ac oma Street were removed from the Plan because the property owners made it clear they wanted to deal directly with the redev!'loper. lr. Fitzpatrick stated that as long as this property is not included in the Plan , there was nothing the Authority could do. Mr. Harm slated that if the redeveloper is acquiring the properties, it would be up to the property owner to negotia e relocation benefits with th e dev loper. Mr. Close stated that they want to sec everyone treated fairly and no one taken advantage of during the n·d Vf'lopm<>nt. Mr. Novicky stated that he lik d Mr. Kaufman' suggcslion concerning a bonus paym nt for busin ss s to remain In Englewood; he noted that we are trying to create a viable conomic and social center in the City of Engle- wood with th r dev lopm nt proj ct . Mr. Minnick gr ed th.1t th • Aulhorlty would llk to k p th business s that n d to be relucntl'd In Engl wood. Mr. Di 00 to r hoth of hav th t lo atlon ra d y • • • • :·lr. Dickinson asked if it would Ia· rt·<Jsone~hJ,. lo S liJ'.I',<'S l lli:~t I.IJIJ/1 o~ddr, .. ,,, tht,;t: conLe rn s to Mr . llrady, the redeveloper, and to suggest that tlivy kL•C:p the pressure up on the redeveloper and the londowncr b . l-Is . J>owt·r ,, <~S kl!d for furtli L·r el<~rifil"<~LitHI 111 1 llil' l""i"";<·d S IO,Illl(J i''Y""'"' suggested by the EDDA ad hoc committee. She stated that it appee~rs Lh ot some of the members of the Authority are comfortable wl th the Relu c atlon Plan the way it is written , Mr. Pendleton stated that the $10 ,000 payment in oduLLlun tu LhL· Lost of the ac t ual move would not be mandated to everybody, but would be based on "special circumstances ." Mr. Haviland stated that he liked Mr. Fitzpatrick's sugKestion that there should be payment for rent differential on relocated businesses. II sug- gested that if there is an area for discretion on rcloen tlon payment s t o businL'SSl!:--~, Lu cncuuragv hu~·dncbHt ·H lu rclucalc ... • in llll' Cily ul t ·:n g i~·W 1HJd , he would suggest consideration of an increased payment to tho se businLSbl'h . Mr. Voth pointed out that in the Relocation Benefit Plan, as written, th~r" is no maximum established for payment on "special circumstancc>J." Ill! r l!- iterated that so far, everything that has been discussed is availabl e in the Relocation Plan without changing one word. Mr. F itzp trick stated that he felt there is a ne d for Ubl' of conunon ~L'Il'-<' and fairnt·ss in the relocation payments. lie pointed out that there ib a period of adjustment when a business relocates before it is stablishcd .mu doing well in the new location; he stated that he feels a certain paymvnl s hould b allowed, and that this is where the proposcu $2,000 supplL·ntL·nt.ll payment could come in. .·l r. Voth d 1 c u li? k d if th EDDA membe rs had nything further Lh y w nt d to ndl net want it includ thh. t pag fiv , which mak B r f r nc to tlw UKJ!est !on tion sist nc s to solic!tallon of n•ovinH csll- t h did not f l this n d s tu h • lnclutl dIn tloL· J::DDA h s no obj tion to doing thl , but they du Handbook that th ir rol would b xp nd d to lVbJ t lut 15 , • I . • • - -10- cerns prop rty purchased by the Urban Renewal Authority at 3767 Sou th Cl arkson Street . The proposed resolution requests transfer of funds t o facili t a t e pay - ment of relocation benefits to the tenants of this residence i n the amou n t of $2 ,500, and also to transf e r monies to the Urban Renewal Autho r ity accou n t for the relocation of the house at 3767 South Clarkson S reet. Ms. Powers pointed out that it has n ot been determined whether it will be financially feasible to relocate h:ls hous , but in th event it is , the funds should be available to ffectuat the relocation as soon as possible . Ms. Powers stated that it is not clear whether relocation a n d r esale of this structure will yield a r etu rn to the Authority to justify th is expen se . Ms . Powers stat d that the $52,000 listed in the Resolution is the estimat ed maximum cost for feasibl e relocation of the structure. Mr. Dickinson express d concern on requ esting transfer of fu n ds befo r e it is definit ely determined the structure can be rel oca ed . Mrs. Cole asked if th estimate of $52 ,000 would cover the cost of the lot , movin g the structure nd rehabilitation? Ms. Powers stated tha t if th cost exceeded this estimat , it would n ot be economi ca lly feasible to re- locat the structure. Mr. Hins on pointed out that the timing on the relocation or demolition of the structure is critical, b cause work comm nc s on the detention pond in April. Mr . Dickins n asked if Ms. Pow rs stated th t pointed out vag valu • should be d ny lt rnative but relocation had been pursued? the other altern~tiv i d molition. Ms. Cole would be sal- structur . ould m k Mr. Fitz- o th house su it mi ht b for a fev thou and dollars nd on • I . • • - -i i - AYES : Minnick, Nov i cky , VoLh , Cole, FiLzpatri~k NAYS : Dickinson ABSENT : McClung TtH.· mul iu n c arrit:U. V. RELOCATION BENEFITS/RELOCATION HANDBOOK. Ms. Power£. ask<:d to briefly return to discussion of Lh~· l<eloeulion llanc.Jbook, and noted that Mr . Ha rm had reviewed the Handbook and ,;ubJ u iLLcd a li,;t of sugges t ed modifications for consideration by the Autho rity. Sht• a s kC'cl if th<: Authority want<:c.J to n :vi<:w the,;c comment,; at thi s li m~·, ur .1L th~· next regular meeting of April 6 , 1983. She stated that she also wanted to consider in greater d(·tail the• llldlt<·r uf early 1uuve,; ant! Lhe payu1e11L uf renL c.JiffcrcnLlai. Si1~· .1 S kvd wh .1 L ti1v Autho rity felt about the proposed $2 ,000 supplemental payment to bu siness relocatees? ~lr . Fitzpatrick stated that he would like to see the proposed supplemental payment used as payment for additional rent fees or the rent differential payment. Mr. Fitzpatrick noted his concern over the p reposed supplemenLa J payme nt of $5 ,000 to a residential property owner, but only $2,000 pa ymvnt to a business owner. Discussion ensued. ~lr. Minnick sugge>~tcu that equ . .J paymen ts be paid to both residential and business property owners. ~I~;. Powen, asked the Authority to keep in mind that at the meeting of Apr I I 6th , there wi.ll bC! two requests fur payment of relocation benefits for till· properties purchased at 3767 South Clarkson Street and 3787 South Clarkson Street. Ms. Powers noted that under the pr sent Relocation Plan , a resi- dential owner can receive payment up to a maximum of $5,000. :·l r. Dickinson ask d if a relocation benefit plan is mended, wh th r those pe rsons paid reloca tion ben fits prior to th mendment could come back to the Authority and ask for additional payment. :1 r. liin~;on compa red payments th t would b du to Mr. and Mrs. Wcarncr un- d r th proposed relocation b n fit program and und r the present plan, notin6 thl re l!> .1 differ ·n c of $800. lie then compan•d pilyml•ntt~ d1w to Essl ing r/Smolk nd r th• two propos la, noting th r is diff r n of $20. :-lr . II rm s t at d th t whU th further paym·nt, it would b is p id. Mr . H rm did advia tlority t o witch h ndbook/r r . I t.:p1Hrl<:k r v l i n of p r loc t up to th that it to ation a cou ld pply l o the Authurlly for dtacr tion o th Authority on wh t would b poor publicity Cor th Au- b n fita with any d gr of frequen cy, Cor lh Il l tu quo wtth th•• 1 r u- to buain •• t •n ntl. to • ,. 1- ur It, und1 r llw • ) I • • • • -12- present plan a property owner would receive up to $5 ,000 in relocation benefits. Mr. Hinson stated that the proposal would give residential property owners the actual cost of the move, plus the $5,000 supplemental payment. Discussion ensued. Ms. Powers stated that from a staff view point, it would be easier to have a set fee for payments rather than calculating the payments on each individual case. She pointed out that there is a question on what "special circumstance" means; it would be simpler to allot a sum of money to a dislocatee and let them apply these funds for whatever purpose they wish. Mr. Novicky asked if it would be possible to incr ase benefits to thos e businesses relocating in En glewood? He noted that cities can require mu- nicipal employees to liv within the corporate limits of the city and asked if monetary benefits arc to be realized whether the businesses could not be required to relocat in Eng lewood. Mr. Harm stat ed that he could not state whether this has been done, or could b done , but sugges ted that he would look into this suggestion. Mr. Dickinson ask d if a court case on such a required relocation could de- lay the proj ct. Mr. Harm stated that the fund would have to be placed in escrow, but that the project would not be del y d; the displac e would be removed from th sit ne ded for the project. Ms. Cole sugg sted making th supplemental p ymcnts to business displacees and residential owners the same. ~l r. Minnick noted that by increasing th payment to businessm n to $5,000 this would h lp atisfy some of th con- cerns xpress d by th EDDA. Discussion l.'n. u d. Mr. Fitzpatrick suggested that this b talc. n und r con. !deration nd d c l i~n mad at the next m ting. Ms. Cole stat d that sh apprnv d th modifi ti n uggested by r. Harm concerning Hom Occupati n . Ms. Po w r stated th t th r are s veral oth r ch n s th st ff f l a should b made. Ms. Pow rs gav n up-1 r n n go iation with th Log n Str et. It was not d th t Mr . D Witt will tion proceedings. • Pow r thb ti pi c have n t nt ion pond. wn r at 3601 South h ndlin th cond mna- • • • • • -I 'J- c u ssed the· wo rk that wi 11 have to he don!' for Lhc· dvtvnl ion 1'"'"1, .11rd ll <>lr d t hal Lh l rt: will have Lo be "sloping" which wouLd no L allow L hl· huu;;c Lo l'l'- main o n the subject site . Ms . Powers stated that then· would l~<~vc · lu hl· acc ~ss fr o m S ouLh Clarkson Street . Nr. F iL~patrick discussed the negotiations wilh Lhu School Uoard un Lhc usc of the athletic field for the detention pond, and who will assume the main- tenance. Th~ meeting was dt:clared adjourned at 8:45 P . M. / / t t lt.t-~- Gertrude G. Welty .Recording Secretary / • • • .. MINUTES LIQUOR LICENSE AUTHORITY March 16, 1983 5 D Chairperson Donald Styes called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: ALSO PRESENT: Donald Styes, Lloyd Bryan, Ronald Lunders, Frances Cosby Ronald Blanchard Charles Grimm, Assistant City Attorney Eric Johannisson, Revenue Chief Brenda Castle, Recording Secretary * * * MR . BRYAN MOVED, AND MS. COSBY SECONDED, TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF JANUARY 19, 1983. AYES: NAYS: The motion carried. Donald Styes, Lloyd Bryan, Ronald Lunders, Frances Cosby None * * * Robert Lonq, attorney, and Jose Corral, owner of El Tepehuan Restaurant and Steak House, 3457 South Broadway, were present to request a hearing date for the consi deration of an appli cation for a Beer and Wine License for th establishment. It was decided without a motion to set a hearing date for April 27, 1983, at 7:30p.m. Also, that the boundaries for neighborhood petitioning would be Fox Street on the st, Pearl Street on the east, Bates Avenue on the north and Oxford Avenue on the so~th. * * * r of Ali-Bab , bbf M. Yaq n , was pres nt to qu st permission d 1 his stablfsh nt at 3370 South Ac Stre t, Engl od, CO. COSBY MOVED, AND M . LU DERS SEC OED, TO APPROVE TH REQUEST TO RE DEL ALI-BABA, 3370 SOUTH ACOMA STREET . AYES: YS: 10n 1rr1 d. DonaldS y , Lloyd Bryan, Ronald Lund rs, Frances Cosby • 0 • • • • I • Liquor License Authority ' Mar ch 16, 1983 page 2 - .. • • • MS . COSBY MOVED. AND MR. BRYAN StCONOED, TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN APPLICATION BY PESTER MARKl TING CO MPANY FOR A 3.2 BEER, OFF PREMISES, LICENSE FOR ITS OUTLET AT 2715 SOUTH SANTA FE, ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. AYES: Donald Styes, lloyd Bran, Ronald lunders, Francs Cosby NAYS: None The motion carried. Eric Johannisson, Deputy City Clerk for the City of Enalewood, presented the followinq exhibits for the Ci y · 1. The complete appltcation Including: State Application Form Background Information on the officers of the corporation letters of Referen'e Corporate Records Infonnation rela ing t o the right to the property Publisher's affid vit showino t a t he no ice of public h arino was published in the Enolewood Sentinel on February 2 , 1983 . 2. The written rep ort fro 0 dipus, Inc r gard1ng th results of the pe itionino. 3. The petttion circulated by Oedtpus, Inc. Brenda Ro w of Oedipus, Inc. was prese t to explain the outco of the petitioning. Sh e said that of the three hundred and fifty-three contacted, 11 w re not qualified, 165 were Qualified to siqn, and 177 were not at ho Of the 165 qualifted, sixty favored is s anc of th license, tw nty-s ven w r oppos d, and the rema1ntna seventy-eiqht did not sian for variou~ reasons includino relioiou ObJ c ion , non-usao of alcohol, etc . Rob rt Batley, 198 Union Blvd, La woo d, Colorado, attorn y, pr s nt d vtd nc and w1 n sses for th pplica n • P st r r etino Comp ny . Th oil tny wt n ss s spo e 1r1 favor o 1 uanc o th ll nc : 1ttl ton, CO, E cut1v ic P st n Conpan nv r, Colo ad , o • Colorado, Sal inq and par of • Eng• w d, Colored • fng d , • ,. s • 10 ic I • -• • - Liquor License Authority March 16, 1983 page 3 - Roberta Pataway, 2645 S. Geddes Avenue, littleton, Colorado , owne r of a lighting store on South Santa Fe Drive, Englewood, Colorado Mary Burk, 2222 W. Briarwood Avenue, Littleton, Colorado, owner of All -City Pools on South Santa Fe Drive, Englewood, Colorado Mr . Bailey also presented the following exhibits for the applican t: A. "C ompany Policeis and laws on Sales of 3 .2% Beer" B. Pet itions placed in the Peste r station allowin g the signer to sign for or against the issuance of the license Afte1 finding no one present in opposition to the license, and Mr . Bailey's closing remarks, the Authority adjourned to executive session. Approximately twenty minutes later the hearin~ was reconvened. MS. COSBY MOVED, AND MR . BRYAN SECONDED, TO APPROVE THE ISSUANCE OF A 3.2% BEER LICENSE, OFF PREMISES, FOR PESTER MARKETING COMPANY, 2715 S. SANTA FE DRIVE, ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO . AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: The motion carried. Donald Styes, Frances Cosby, Lloyd Bryan None Ronald lunders MR. LUNDERS MOVED, AND MR. BRYAN SECONDED, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AYES: Donald Styes, Frances Cosby, lloyd Bryan, Ron lunders NAYS: None Th motion carried . • • MR . BRYAN MOVED, AND MR. LUNDERS SECONDED, TO APPROVE RENEWAL OF A HOTEL/ RESTAURANT LICENSE FOR PAUL'S RESTAURANT AND PIZZERIA, 3542 SOUTH FOX ST . ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. AY S: NAYS : Th 10n c rr1 d . Don ld Sty s, Frances Co by, Lloyd Bryan, Ronald Lund rs Non • * • • I • - Li~uor License Authority March 16, 1983 page 4 - • • • The Authority received a letter from Dave G. Manzanares, Chairman of the Colorado Liquor/Beer Codes Study Committee and Boulder City Clerk, requestin g support for H.B. 1448. The Author i ty tabled d1scussion of the request until they could review a copy of the bill . * * * Mr. Johan nisson asked for the Author1ty's support in a alcohol and drug rehabilitation progra m sponsored by Littleton parents for their Junior High and High School age children. * * * There being no further bus1ness to discuss, the n~etinq was adjourned at 9:15 p.m . ...;' . } '-~» ,.~ ;.d:/u Brend~stle Recording Secretary /bjc • I . { • • LIQU OR LICENSE AUTHORITY City of Englewood State of Colorado Pester Market ing Company dba Pester 2715 S. Santa Fe Drive Englewood, Colorad o for a 3 .2 Beer Off-Premises License Hearin g before Liquor License Author ity March 16, 198 3 Finding of Fact, Conclusions and Decision of the Liquor License Authority, concerning the application for an Off-Premises 3 .2 Fermented Malt Beverage License for Pester Marketing Company, dba Pester, located at 2715 S. San ta Fe Drive, Englewood, County of Arapahoe, Colorado. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That applicant for the 3.2 Fermented Malt Beverage License is Pester Marketing Company dba Pester, located at 2715 South Santa Fe Drive, Englewood, Colorado. The application was filed on or about December 13, 1982 (City Exhibit Nl). 2. Notice of the Public Hearing to determine if the license should be awarded was published inthe Englewood Sentinel i n the City of Englewood, ) County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado on February 2, 1983. 3. The Englewood Police Department conducted an investigation of the corporate officers Jack D. Scurlock, Peggy Ann Lammers, David William Lammers, Arvid V. Carlson, Charles R. Worman and Jack C. Pester, and found no moral weakness, criminal arrests or affiliation wfth organized crime. 4 . Personal histories of appl icants and letters attestinq to the ir good moral character were received by the City. 5. A copy of the deed of the property at 2715 South Santa Fe to Pester showing the applicant can do business at that location was rece ived . 6. A dr win g of the layout of th bu il ding h s n rece1v d . 7. Th applicant is authoriz d o do bus n ss in the State o Colorado as vid nc d by th C rtiffcat of th Depar nt of Stat , ry Estill Buchanan, S cretary of Stat , dated Ma rch 31. 1981. 8. Th 1nanc1al stat nt and oth r docu nts su tt d by th applicant indicat pplican is in sou nd ffn ncfal condf ion and able too rat ablfsh n as .2 re ail off pr mise outl 9. • I • • • • Pester Marketing Co . Findings of Fact page 2 - inhabitants of the neighborhood were not being met, 27% indicated the needs and desires of the in habit ants of the neighborhood were bein9 met. (City Exhibit s 2 and 3) 10. Applicant called Jack Scurlock, Executive Vice President who attested that applicant needed the requested license to maintain competitive in business; James Risdon, Sales Manager, who attested to the applicants' regulations for operating the 3.2 establishment, petitions applicant had solicited from customers showing an overwhelming recommendation for the granting of the license (applicant's exhibits A and B); Don Welsh, the manager, who attested to his experience and operation. Applicant also called Roberta Pataway and Mary Burk, who, as residents of the neighborhood, testified as to the need to have applicant awarded the license. 11. Despite a solicitation from the chair, no on e opposed the granting of the license to the applicant . CONSLUSION The needs and desires fo the neighbor ho od are not currently being met as evidenced by the 68.91 of persons qua li fied to express an opinion saying that there is a need for awarding thi s license. DECISION The Authority hereby approves the awarding of the license for off premise consumpti on of 3.21 fermented malt beverage to Pester Marketin9 Company, dba Pester, at 2715 S. Santa Fe Drive, Englewood, Colorado . CG/bc • I • • • • - ENGLE\vOOD DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT COMM!'l''l'EE 111\RCII 17, 1983 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mosler, llavilnnd, l'owPrs, Ensign OTHERS PRESENT: Henry Burgwyn, Fred Kaufman The meeting commenced with Henry Burgwyn 's present11Li on of u urnfL requesL for proposals which Brady Enterprises is planning to utilize to solicit firms interested in doing a detailed market analysis for the Downtown Re- development Project Area . This market analysis wl.ll pruviuc esLi111ates of demand for the various types of proposed land uses, an assessment of the metropolitan competitive environment, and other information necessary to determine the appropriate mix of uses within the Project Area. Mr. Burgwyn asked that any corrunents by CommltLee members be forward ed Lu hiou hy 1.oreh 18, 1983, Mr. Burgwyn also added that comparable RFPs would be senL oul by Brady to solicit architectural and planning firms. He noted that the Management Committee would be asked to review the list of firms to which the RFPs were being sent and to assist in reviewing responses. Susan Powers reported that the public hearing on the downtown zan before the Planning and Zoning Commission would be held on March 22, 1983 . The presentation for that hearing is scheduled to be finalized on th Monday prior to Lhe meeting. Ms. Powers sLa Leu that she was unsure whether Lill · Planning and Zoning Commission would vote on creation of the zone the night of the Hearing, or merely continue the Hearing. The Committee discussion then turned to the Broadway Design Guidelines. It was rel ted that a copy of the EDDA comments on th guid lines had been sent to Don Ensign. The next step in implementing th guidelin s are to develop a format for review and pres nt th guid Hncs to Council fur action s a policy guidance mechanism. Th se guid lines would b stabli11hcd s the basis for application and r ceipt, by inter at d m rchants, of design grants. The group greed that a main topic of dtscu11Ylon aL lh<· next Managem nt Committe Meeting would b th m thod of dminist ring th CDBC d sign fund. AftPr this proc sa 1 t bliah d, tudy ion would b s hedul d with Council to pr s nt th final guid line and th d sign fund proc sa. Fr d Kaufman upd t d the Co itt Burt-own d building Mr. Kaufm n aid th of r •l ruf Ill in1; Lh<• b reloc t d du to ith N t Burt on the I) 2) • South Lincoln Str t. t in th id lh,&t h.JVl' tu l h•· lit! or nil d rut lun to 0 T ny u t I a "I tn IH t 1 n I • - • • • • -2- 4) Parking for the Post Office would probably have tu be rcarran~,;ed tu allow sufficient right-of-way for the realignment. One s cheme is for public parking, which is currently on the north ern s ide of the building, to be moved to the southern side of the building where the Post Office c urrently parks It s trucks. The tru ck p ;11·kln ~ ;or"" ,·u uld '"' r<·;orr '"'l',''" to accommodate the public. The possibil ity also exists for relocation of the Postal Service operation to a more centralized location, perhaps in the heart of the Redevelopment Project Area, and conversion of the building to some other use. It was suggested that Fred Kauf man , Don Ensign, and He nry Burgwyn review the most recent design for the realignment and possibly follow up that re- view by meeting with Nate Burt. A later meeting could be arranged with Post Office officials to discuss the possibilities for that building. An additional sugg estion was that any redesign of buildings in the Floyd re- alignment area should be coordinated with design uffurLo; ln the Little Dry Creek area. The meeting was adjourned at approximately 4:00P.M., and the next Manage- ment Committee meeting was scheduled for Karch 31, 1983 at 2:00 P. M. in the Library Conference Room. Susan Powers Director of Community Development gw • 0 I • • • DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT COMM ITTEE APRIL 7, 1983 2:00 P. M. s COMMI TTEE MEMBERS PRESEN T : Susan Powers, Mike Haviland, Don Ensign, Henry Burgwyn COMMITTEE MEMBERS ABS ENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Fred Kaufman, Wm. Richard Hinson, Jeri Linder Susan Powers opened the meeting by giving a report to the Committee on actions taken at the City Council study session of April 4, 1983. Sh e s a i d tha t Council had decided to proceed with the design work on th e pro posed Br oadway/Floyd Avenu e realignment. Ah;o, an apprais al o f Lhe l>ul l d i n11 u n the s outheast corner of this intersection was authorized, Ms. Powers reported that the design guidelines for the private bui l dings along South Broadway were presented to City Council for considerat ion. Co uncil d e cide d that the guidelines should be adopted by ordinance . This o r d inance would have the effect of requiring any facad e r e ha bilita t ion work along South Broadway betwe en Eastman Avenue and U.S. 285 to conform to t he guidelines. Ms. Powers s tated that City Counc i l would like to ac t on the guid el ines ordinanc e at i t s April 18, 1983 meeting. It wa s s uggest e d by Fred Kaufman and Don Ensign that the current draft of the guidelines be fo rwarded to EDDA and EBA for c omments prior to Council adoption. The Com -mi tt ee agre ed. The n e x t to pic o f di scus sion w s the adm in is t er the de s ign and loan funds m d av ilabl thr ou gh 1982 nd 1983 pr sent d a draft o f s uch a proc e ss nd aug at ions. proc ess which will be ut i lized t o for South Broadway. These funds w r CDB G grant s to th e City . Di c k Hi nson nd as k d th Committe f o r c omme nts Thr key elem nt s o r pha ses o f this proc a w r id nt :f i d: 1) Public R l ation s a nd Pr og r am Fam i liariza t ion --To infor m po t ntial participants of th existence of t he proara nd how to tak ad v nt a of it; 2} Application nd Administration --To a1 1 t inter It d p rtiae in de- velopina d alan id u, applytna for availabl funds, nd "walktna" th throuah th pro a s; d 3) Proar Follow-Up --and i n sp ct proar activit! to a sur co pll nc With &Uid proc dur •• r o l o t DDA 1 in pliehin th pr ar w r l und fin nd op • l I • • • • -2- Another aspect of the process concerned the makine of loan s . Sus,111 l'uwL·r s stated that banks had been contacted regarding their interest in participatin g in the program , but the exact method of fund distribution , loan fees, ap - plication processing, etc. were yet to be determined. She added that a major factor impacting this program structure would I><• Lh c p"r<IIIIL'l<'r s L'S- tablished by the State for allocation and use of funds. Ms. Powers said that a mee ting had been scheduled with a representative of the State to ob- tain guidance on this item. Other aspects of the program which were discussed includ~d: 1) The method of selecting an architect, or architects, to serve as a design consultant for merchants; 2) The extent of the architects role in the design and construction of the improvements; 3) The extent of the required public relations effort for the program; and 4) Potential methods of using the CDBG funds to make rehabilitation loan s through the banks. Ms. Powers addressed Mr. Haviland regarding his feelings as to EDDA's par- ticipation in the program. Mr. Haviland said that he had been told by his Board that EDD A wants to participate in the program, but they don't want Lo get involved in the administration of the program. Dick Hinson restated the thre "phases" of the progrwn: 1) Public Relations; 2) Application and Administration; and 3) Follow-up , and ugg sted that the first phase a em d particularly suit d to EDDA b - c us of its clos relationship to th business community. Ms. Powers added the process would be more eff ctiv if a staff p reon, whether city or EDDA, was r aponaible for taklng n applicant through ach st p of th process. Mr . Haviland r pli d that he wasn't sure how involv d he could g t in assisting merchants with lo n applications or other asp eta of th proc •• du to his Bo rd'a d air to void getting involved in "ad11ini.atr tion." that it w a his i.apr aion th r habilitation proar 11altin tr r 111. rl t on th • I • - ) ( • • • • -3- Next, Henry Burgwyn reported that five proposals had been r ecei ved hy Brady Corporation in response to the request for proposals on a downtown marketing study. A selection is slated for April 8, 1983, with th e st udy due in approximately sixty days. He stated that information from the s tudy would be coming in to Brady ln increments over the Htudy pc r lud. Mr. Burgwyn further noted that some of the appraisals for downtown property had been completed and were ready for review at this time. He added that architect selection by Brady Corporation should also occur in the near future. The mee~ing adjourned at approximately 4:00 P. M. Submitted by: ~1\ fwJM-1 Susan Powers • 0 I . • • .. • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MARCH 22, 1983 I. CALL TO ORDER. 5 c: The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zonin g Commission was called to order at 7:00 P. M. by Chairman Milton E. Senti. Members present: Becker, Carson, McBrayer, Senti, Stoel Powers, Ex-officio Members absent: Venard, Allen, Barbre, Tanguma Also present : Assistant City Attorney Thomas V. Holland Planning Director Dorothy A. Romans Senior Planner Susan T. King Don Ensign, Design Workshop, Inc . II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. March 8, 1983 Chairman Senti stated that the Minutes of March 8, 1983 , were to be con- sidered for approval. Carson moved: Stoel seconded: The Minutes of March 8, 1983, be approved as written. AYES: B ck r, Carson, McBrayer, Senti, Sto 1 AY S: Non ABS ENT : Allen, B rbr , T nguma, Venard Th motion carr i d. Car on mov d: Stoel s cond d: Th Public H aring on Case 19-83 , amendm nt of th Comp r - h naiv Zonlng Ordin n ee, b op n AYES: Cars n, Bray r, S nti, Sto 1 AYS: ABS T: , V rd, All n Th mot! n c rri d. t 11 p r ona in th d ir r. S nti th r b for th C iaai n. r D d • giv n an opportunity • Pow r a to giv aom co•-I • • • • -2- sider an amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance by enacting a new Downtown Development District to govern the redevelopment in the downtown area. The second hearing scheduled for this evening is to consider amend- ment of the Comprehensive Zoning Map by designating a specific area for the Downtown Development District. Following consideration of these two issues by the Planning Commission , the proposed am ndment of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Zoning Map will have to be con sidered by the City Council at Public Hearings before the proposed amendments be- come effective . Ms . Powers s tressed that the Public Hearings tonight are not to consider the Downtown Plan or the Downtown Redevelopment Plan; these have been ap- proved by the City Council and are not an issue at this Hearing. The Hearings on the amendment of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Zoning Map are to consider means of implementing th Downtown Development Plan and the Downtown Redevelopment Plan. Ms. Powers pointed out that implementation of the Downtown Development Plan and the Downtown Redevelopment Plan deals with design guidelines, zoning, etc. One of the specific goals is for the Planning Commission and City Council to consider amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance and that the regulations contained in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance are compatible with th Downtown Redev lopment Plan and the Downtown Development Plan. Ms. Powers noted that copi s of th illustrative plan are on display for the Commission m mbers and for members of the audience. Ms. Powers stated that Mrs. Romans will be speaking on behalf of the staff in making the staff r port; Mr. Don Ensign of Design Workshop is also present and may want to addre s th Commission, as well a other memb rs of the udience. Ms. Pow rs sk d tha As ist nt City Attorney Holland discuss th procedure on the c Hearings. r. Holland th nd t ted that th d ring is to gain input from Compr h nsiv Zoning Ordinanc ture of th hearings b for th is b ing "contested", but to g t. m k r comm ndations to th City not dv rsarial --th r will aking to th Commission. • he liv 1 t 3600 Community v l o p- for th r cord a pp r d in th I . • • . . • -3- Mrs. Romans stated that the Downtown Redevelopment Plan has been adopted by the City Council, and the hearings on the proposed B-DD District regula- tions and the amendment of the Zoning Map are a step toward the implementa- tion of that Plan. Mrs. Romans stated that one of the primary ways to con- trol land use is through zoning regulations. Mrs. Romans stated that the proposed B-DD District regulations is a new classification which is necessary because the existing B-1 Zone classification does not focus on the downtown redevelopment needs. Many uses are presently permitted in the B-1 Zo ne District which are not felt to be appropriate for the "pedestrian-oriented" redevelopment area; also, some uses which are felt to be appropriate for the redevelopment area were not permitted by the B-1 Zone District. Mrs. Romans stated that the general boundaries of the area proposed to be included in the B-DD District designation are West Floyd Avenue on the north; the Acoma/Broadway alley on the east between West Floyd Avenue and West Hampden Avenue and adjacent to Little Dry Creek between South Broadway and South Lincoln Street; on the south by U. S. 285, and on the we st by South Elati Street. Mrs. Romans stated that the intent of the proposed B-DD District is: 1. To guide the development within the designated redevelopment ar a. 2. To create an attractive and competitive downtown in order to retain our position as a viabl commercial and financial activity center. 3. To serve as a focal point for community activity and community pride. Mrs. Romans reviewed objectives of the redevelopment project, which includ such matters as th need to provid "connecti n" between the Broadway business ar a nd Cind r 11 City; to provid an uto-free p d strian area, to ttract business and prof ssional offices; m intain a proper b lance of th public and priv t s ctors. Mr • Romans st t d that th eff ct of th regulations, when approv d, will b to provid for residential us in the downtown ar a, prof ssional and g n ral offic space , retail and p rsonal service , sp cial use , public f ciliti s, and hotel nd convention cent r. Th r gulations apply to thr distinct areas within th di trict: Th Commons, along Gi r rd Mall nd Littl along West Floyd Av nu ; d th intens d v lopm nt. total district. Th will b "r pl • Di - which d in 11a t of which I • • • • - -4- Mrs. Romans noted that the maximum heig ht of the structures will vary de- pending on whether they are proposed for The Commons, The Periphery, or in The Center. Mrs. Romans noted that along the south side o f West Floyd Avenue in the area which is adjacent to the residential district to the north, buildings must be set back from the property line an amount equal to the height of the structure. This is not required in The Commons , or in o the r areas of The Center. Minimum setbacks, building bulk and parking requirements were further re- viewed by Mrs. Romans. Mrs. Romans pointed out that if a developer brings in a parking study prepared by a traffic engineer or other qualified pro- fessional, which indicates that the parking proposed by the developer is sufficient for the proposed use, the parking study will be accepted. If no parking study is presented by the developer, the parking standards set forth in the proposed B-DD regulations would apply to the development . Mrs. Romans discussed the Usable Open Space provisions, and pointed out balconies and roof tops that are improved for the use of the tenants would be counted as usable open space. Landscaping requirements were noted; Mrs. Romans pointed out that the landscaping requirements would be governed by the Landscaping Ordinance. Utilities for the redevelopment would be re- quired to be underground. Mrs. Romans pointed out that the Downtown Redevelopment Plan addresses the c reation of a design review team to review all redevelopm nt proposals. The proposed B-DD District provides for the appointment of a design review team which team will consider all red evelo pment plan s to assure quality de- v loprnent in the redevelopment area; this team will also b responsible to ssu re that all redevelopment propos ls are in compl iance with the Downtown Development Plan and the Downtown Red v lopment Pl an. This team would be appointed by the City Council, and would be composed of not more than fiv mem bers. Because of the technical nature o f th review that would b r e- quired, it is suggested that th m rnbe r s b staff representatives of th Urban R newal Authority , th EDDA , nd th City of Englewood. On member of the Committee would b requir ed to b a "d ign pro f sional ", and th fifth m mb r would, pref rably, hav d v lopm nt background. ~r • Romans discus sed the th design r view. Th d the propo d pl ns d t rmin that the m nt Plan or D pl ns t o bring Pl nnin g nd pl consid r d Hra. 8-DD r. M Bray r b p Aitl d highlighta of th propos d tiona? ri w ua d co d t rmin what ua a w re to wh t ua a w uld b ltainat 1 • Fonn r • 0 I • • • .. -5- Planning Commission member Donald L. R. Smith chaired the committee that s tudied the downtown district. This committee went through the existing B-1 Zo ne Distric t regulations, and it was the consensus of this Committee that there were uses permitted in this zone district that should not be allowed in the central business district. The B-1 District was also re- viewed by the EDDA when Mr. Keller was the Executive Director, and several uses were suggested for elimination from the B-1 Zone District. These recomme ndations were referred to the Planning Commission for consideration. The proposed uses in the B-DD District are based on this background; the uses which are permitted or prohibited are not an arbitrary determination by the staff. Mr. McBrayer expressed his concern about the restriction of specific uses from a specific zone district without supporting criteria. Mr. McBrayer stated that he felt it would be essential to have a list of specific c rit e ria which is used to justify elimination of specific uses. Mrs. Romans pointed out that while s ome of the uses may not be permitted in the B-DD District, they are permitted in other zone districts in the City; they are not eliminated from the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance en- tirely. Mrs. Romans stated that it is her understanding that uses may be prohibited in a specific district . Mrs. Romans s tated that Mr. McBray r 's concern is a point w 11-taken; th purpose of the hearing is t o get input on th propos d B-OD regulations. Mr. Holland pointed out tha t this proposed zon for a specific purpose, and in keeping with the purpo trict, a determin tion is d on u e that would c that re f elt to b incompatible with th pu of th excluded . Mr. Holland agreed that th r i a n d a cl ssification of uses, and cited limination of car d al r pedestrian-oriented zone. Mr. Holland stated that if a 1 has rational rea sons t o exclud us s from a zon normally is n ot qu stioned. Mr . Holl nd not b made rb it r rily, but if th r is rational r ason, u excluded. Mrs. B cker qu stion d th elimin tion of H alth Treat nt Faciliti s, and asked if this would apply to doctors offic s, a develops nt such s th s dicsl compl x, or to maaeag parlors. Mrs. Ro~s stat d that doctors offic a would b includ d und r offic a . Mrs. Rom na stat d that th pro- hibit! n of II alth Tr tm nt Faciliti s w uld includ parolors. pos d diatri t. classification do p cific zon , nd Conclusion r. no to Hr. II 11 nd atat to tl nd it w • n rn in. n na fr th eo .. tssion? H arin mb ra r th udi nee who wish d id ntify th .. lv a. ry t th a p rao ap akin& • 0 I • • - -6- Mr. Dennis Ross stated that he is an Englewood resident and an architect by profession. Mr. Ross stated that he has gone through some of the de- velopment restrictions in the B-DD District, and feels that the figur es ci ted are highly unrealistic, such as the 12.5 foot height from floor to floor, and the bulk of the building. Mr. Ross stated that he did not think any developer could put a building on any site using those restrictions. Mr. Ross pointed out that the 12.5 foot floor-to-floor height limitat ion does not take into account penthouse , levators, etc. which would be atop the structure. He stated that he feels th floor-to-floor height limitat ion needs to be increased by one f oot for offic buildings . Mr . Ross stat ed that the bulk of the buildings --150 x 450 ft. --"would be so massive it would look horrendous." Mr. Ross stated that he felt staff should look at the figures more closely. Mrs . Romans asked what Mr. Ross would suggest; is he saying the buildings would be too large? Mr. Ross stated that these figures should be reviewed, but he feels that th floor-to-floor height is insufficient, and the bulk of the building is far too larg . Mrs. Romans pointed out that the building bulk figures are "maximum"; this does not mean that the structures must b built to that size. Mrs. Romans pointed out also that the figures are based on the construction figures used for the First Interstate Bank and the First National Bank buildings. Mr. Ross questioned that these two structures could "be built again to thos standards and size and b a rentabl building." He reiterated that he did not feel a building d signed to the figures cited in the proposed ordinan ce would be workable, or that financing could be arranged. Mr. Ross stated that the proposed ordinanc does not address whether parking facilities should be within the buildin or separate from the building. He felt th matter of underground parking or parking structure should b taken into account in consideration of any high-ris structur . Mr. Ross reit r ted his initial concerns that th 12.5 foot floor-to-floor h ight is f r too small, and that the permitt d building bulk is far too large; further, that the maximum height of th buildings does not take into account elevator st ructur s , parapets, pent- houses , etc. Mrs. Romans point d out to Mr. Ross th t th propos d 8-DD District would b com a p rt of th exi ting Compr h nsiv Zoning Ordin nee, and that r - quirements cont in d in oth r parts of th ordinanc would apply to the redevelopment. Mrs. Romans pointed out that th Supplem ntary R gulations , which are cont ined in th Compr h nsiv Z ning Ordinanc , state th t 1 vato r s tructures, p nthous a, parap t a , t c . re not included as part o th h ight of th buildin • • Pow ra ask d Hr. Ross wh t h lt w uld b r n floor h ight? Mr. Ross stat d that 13.5 f t would b it could possibly b 13 f t. • bl for a floor-t o- r asonable, and that I . ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN D£V£LOPMENT AUTHORITY ~ 5-snom-.a. Slrm EnglowooO, Coioroc1o 8()110 Phone lO.l /781 -7885 -7- • • • WHEREAS, a revised downtown zoning will provide a strong implement a tion t oo l for the Downtown Redevelopment, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED tha t the Englewood Downtown Development Au t hority supports the zoning proposal being considered by the Planning and Zoning Commis s ion of the Cit y o f Englewood. Adopt d: flat a .. 'I I' 'I I . Sianature: •••• 1(1'·, ; I ' I\ \. ~·. ' ... ~ .. '''•" Date: Sianatun: I • • • • -8- Mr. Gasson stated that speaking as president of the Fir st Interstate Bank, the bank is aware and very interested in the downtown area because the success of the downtown area is important to the success of the bank. Mr . Gasso n s tated that on behalf of both the EDDA Board and the First I nt er- s tate Bank of Englewood, he supports the proposed B-DD District. Mr. Gasson then presented a copy of the Resolution to the secretary for the reco rd. Mr. Senti then asked if there was anyone else who wished to address the Commission? Mr. Robert D. Phillips, 295 West f~mpden Avenue, asked that the Commission consider the shadows cast by buildings at noon during the winter months. Mr. Phillips noted that at high noon in th e wint er months, a building will cast a s hadow 2-1/2 times the height of the str ucture; for those residential uses along West Floyd Avenu e on the north side of the street, this could mea n being in the shade of s truc tures built on the south side of Floyd Avenue du ring th e winter months. Mr. Senti asked if there were further comme nts? Mr. Mc Brayer discuss ed the Landscaping Ordinance as it would apply to the Downtown District, Mr. Senti stated that in light of the informat ion that has been presented t this meeting, and due to the absence of several of the Commission mem- bers, h would suggest that this Public Hearing b continued. Mr. Holland suggested that a date certain be contained in the motion to continue the H aring. 8 ck r mo ved: Canon second ed: Th Public H ring on Case #9-83 b co ntinued to April 5, 1983. AYES: , AYS: 8 c ker, Carson, McBray r, Senti, Stoel 'on ABS T: Tanguma , V nard, All n, B rbr The motion carried. Mrs. II k r ask d 1C r v d: r n 1 cond d: r, ntt, Sto 1, B rd, AJ I n. rb k r Compreh nsive Zoning nina 0 18-• ntinu d nda nt of th Com- o April 5 , 1 83, publte h thtd1tr1 d will • 0 I • • • •' - V. FINDINGS OF FACT Condominium Conversion -9- CASE 1119-82 Mr . Senti stated that the Findings of Fact on the proposed Con do mi n ium Con- version Ordinance are to be considered for approval. Carson mvoed: Steel seconded: The Planning Commission approve the Findings of Fact on Case #19-82, the Condominium Conversion Ordinance. AYES: McBrayer, Senti, Stoel, Becker, Carson NAYS: None ABS ENT : Tanguma, Venard, Allen, Barbre The mo tion carried. VI . PUBLIC FORUM. Mr. Senti asked if there was any member of the audience who wished to address the Commission? Hearing no comments from members of the audience, Mr. Senti thanked them for their attendance. VII. ATTORNEY'S CHOICE. Mr. Holland stated that he had nothing to bring before the Commission at this time. VIII. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE. Ms. Powers report d that the City Council had direct d the legal staff to pr par a resolution approving the Spenc r's Landing Planned D velopment. The City Council also approv d th Marion Str t Villas Planned Dev lop- m nt. IX. COMMISSION'S CHOICE. Hr. Brayer stated that Kra. IUJ\ , Hra. D lquia , 1 ne Ru 1, M.yor Otia, Hr. Haviland, Hr. nd h t on Karch 18th to dis uea the publication of a promotional brochur for th City. Mr. HcBray r atated that th text for th brochure vas conaid red, and that th th will b "Enal od --a nic plac to co h Minor chan ea vera aad in t e t t, nd Dalquiat and M • Russell will work on refinina the text and pr parina Cor publication if approv d by the City Council. • Pow r• at ted th t eh und ratood publication of th brochure wae by City Council, but th y did not pprov the foraa containin th ina rta on th ba k of th br chur • n appro n .. iled to th .. r atatr tton. 1 h a not n d d by A. • APA lt rein I • • • • • 0 -10- he approved these figures. Mr. Steel questioned the reason for continuing the two public hearings this evening. It was noted that several members of the Commission are not in attendance, and this would give them a n opportunity to participate in the determination. Ms. Powers commented that the figures cited by Mr. Ross wer e reviewed with the architect working with the prime redeveloper, and Mr. McBrayer inquired of Assistant City Attorney Holland if the legal staff plans to address the issue of criteria for eliminating certain uses from the B-DD District? Mr. Holland stated that a legislative body can det e rmine whether a use is compatible to the stated purpose of the district . Mr. McBrayer referred to the landscaping ordinance, and while it indicates that the B-DD District is included in these provisions, it also states that the requirements for the B-DD District can be "disregarded." He stated that he feels this should be tied down either in the B-DD District or in the land- scaping ordinance; he does not want to see this much flexibility on the re- quirements. Mr. Holland stated that the intent is that the redevelopment must meet the minimum requirements of the landscaping ordinance. The Down- town Design Review team can review the plans independently of those require-ments. Mr. McBrayer stated that he is disappointed that nothing is being done to improve South Broadway in the downtown area. Ms. Powers stated that staff members have been informally told that funds will be available from the state to implement the revolving loan fund with a zero interest rate, which program will be available to businessmen on South Broadway. Ms. Powers stated that funds were granted from the Federal Government to pay for architectural designs for improvement of the Broadway businesses. Ms. Powers reviewed the illustrative plan maps with th Commission. There wa s further discussion on th promotional brochur Mrs. Ro ns stat d that City Council approv d public tion of 20 ,000 brochur s. Mr. S nti asked if th r was anything lse to com b for th Co .. ia a ion ? Th meeting adjourn d at 8:40 P. M. • I • • • • • ,. April 13, 1983 TO: Andy McCown, City Manager FROM: Kells Waggoner, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: ANNUAL CITY CLEANUP Attached hereto is the schedule for the Annual City Cleanup to be held in May. Copies are being sent to the newspapers for publication. lo Attach. • I . • • • MAY, 1983 ANNUAL CITY CLEANUP SCHEDULE May 2 & 9: North of U.S. Hwy. 285 and west of the South Platte River May 3 & 4: North of U.S. Hwy. 285 and east of the South Platte River May 5 & 6: South of U.s. Hwy. 285 and north of Quincy Avenue May 10 & 11: South of Quincy Avenue and east of the South Platte River May 12: South of Quincy Avenue and west of the So uth Platte River Trash is to be placed in throw-away containers near the street and in a con- spicuous place. There will be two trucks in the area on the days indicated. ~es to be picked up are to be cut into lengths not to exc ee d four feet. ~ 6l~goq~P~----- Director of Public Works lo copies: W. Oakley, St. Sup't. ~. Stanton, Servtcenter Sup't. Switchboard Operator G. Diede, Director, Engr. Services R. ahm, Office Engineer City Manager's office -2 Ci y Attorney's office All Dept. heads: Library, Utilities, W.W. Treat nt, Pars Rec., Employee Relations, Finance, Pollee, Fire, Community Development, Building Ofv'n. of Community Developm nt • I • • TO: FROM: DATE : • • • MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor Eugene L . OL i:..; aml Mem bers of City Counc il Louis Parkinson , Municipal Judge April 7 , 1983 ;;u[lJEG'J': r!EGOMMJ·:ND/\'rlON 01•' 1\PPOltl~'Ml::N'l' 01•' 1!/\YM ONil N. ~j /\'l"l'J·:J<, 3001 S . GR ANT STREET , ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO AS /\N ASSOCIATE JUDGE FOR THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD The Court recommends the appointment of the above as an Associate Judge for the City of Engle wood . Mr . Satter is a qualified elector of the City of Englewood , has been duly authorized and licensed to practice law before all cour·l ~; of the State and i s , therefore, fully qualified under lhl' Englewood Municipal Charter . Mr. Satter has had extensive legal experience and wo ld be a valuable addition to the Englewood Municipal Judiciary . I wo ld be willing to answer any questions related to this request. The Co rt respectfully requests your action at the earliest ;;;::;.~;;;:;.::.~intment. LOU !.: HI r • I .,. I Municip J dge /b cc: R ymond Rick D • Satter itt , City Attorney • I . - • • • • ICt-iARO 0 GREENGAAO •• h c:UCE 0 BLACKMAN ,.LIAI.A L SENTER GREENGARD, BLACKMAN & SENTER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 150 ADAMS STREET JA MES E GOLDfARB r.-,OMA$ S RICE DENVER, COLORADO 80206 SCO TT H GELMAN fllA W(LIN 0 0 ~OUGHLIN SC OTT A COOl< KElliN M WARD PETER T MOORE W AAAEN A ROIINION MOLLIE L t•KER April 8, 1983 • The Honorable Eugene Otis, Mayor City ot Englewood 3400 South Elati Englewood, Colorado 80110 Dear Mayor Otis: It is with sincere regret that I am Informing you and the members of the Englewood Water and Sewer Board that I have recently moved to a new residence that is within the city limits of Denver. With this move, I am no longer eligible to sit on the Board and unfortunately must therefore submit this resignation from my office on the Water and Sewer Board. As I discussed with you earlier, I have been looking for some time for a new residence. Unf ortunately, the home I have found Is within Denver's corporat e limits. I very much regret having to both leave the Board and the City of Englewood. l find Englew ood to be a most progressive and stable community that otters its reaidents a great number ot benefits and the hope of a redevelopment project that will further enhance the City's outstanding teatur•. I have allo found the Water and Sewer Board to be a most enlightening experience. The membership of the Board and the Council appear aincerely lnter•ted in maintaining the quality sys tem that Englewood haa constructed over the years and the Water Department is certainly benefiting from the continued leader~hlp or Stuart Fonda in the Department. I would like to thank the City and the Board for the opportunity to have been on the Board and It I may ever be of service In the future, please do not hesitate to call on me . SRC:kh cc: tuart Fonda • Ec ., I l_ : w lP. CitY MANfiGl ~'., . ri C ENClt\'iOOD OF COUNSEL RICHARD l NA Tt1M4 JIO U)U\1 AREA CODE JO:J I • • • • • 1/i BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. ~ SERIES of 1983 COUNCIL BILL NO. 17 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRAD SH AW AN ORDINANCE CREATING PAVING DISTRICT NO. 29 IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF STREET PAVING, CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS IN PAYMENT FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS; AND SETTING FORTH OTHER DETAILS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DISTRICT . WHEREAS, the City Council of Englewood, Colorado, pursuant to the Charter and the Munic ipal Code of the City, and the Laws of the State of Colorado, hereby finds and determines that there exists a necessity for the creation of Paving District No. 29, in the City , and the construction and installation therein of street paving, curb and gutter and sidewalk improvements, together w ith necessary incidentals on certain streets in the City; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing concerning the creation of the District and the construction and installation of the i mprovement s therein has been published once a week for thre consecutive weeks in the Englewood Sentinel , a newspaper of general circulat1on in the City , and in addition , a notice has been mailed, postage prepaid, to each known owner of real property within the proposed District; and WHEREAS, at the t1me and place set forth in the not1ce, th City Council met in open session for the purpos of hearing any obj ctions or protests th t m1gh b m de against the propos d district or th and improv m n s o be constructed or install d; WHEREAS, 11 protests hav b n heard and cons1d red by he City Council, and th Councll has d ermin d that such pro- s s should no b allow d; - 1 • I • • • • BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. Creation of the District. That a special improvement district for the construction, installation or im- provement of the improvements hereinafter described, is hereby created and established in accordance with the Charter and the Municipal Code of the City, and the Laws of the State of Colorado, and shall be known and designated as "Paving District No. 29". All proceedings heretofore taken and adopted in connection with the District are hereby ratified, approved and conf i rmed. Section 2. Engineering Plans and Specifications. That the engineer's reports, together with all of the details, specifi- cations, estimates, maps and schedules thereto attached or ap- pended, are hereby approved and adopted. Section 3. District Boundary. The extent of the District to be assessed for the cost of the improvements and the area to be included within the boundary of the District, shall be all the real property specially benefited, and fronting or abutt- ing on the streets and avenues between the termini hereinbefore described, including the real property w1thin one-half (1/2) block of such streets and avenues. Adjustments for the ass ssmen of costs will be made for irregular and odd-shaped lots and parcels of property . Sect ion 4. Description of Improvements. The kind of improvements and the stre ts and avenues on which such improve- ments shall be construct d or ins alled shall be as follows: 1. nue s : s . s . s . s. N. s . s . s . s . s . N, s . N. s . N. I • - - • 00 • • • 2. Necessary grading and excavation, paving with 8" compacted gravel base course and 3• asphaltic con- crete surface, concrete walks, curb and gutter where not already installed: together with appurtenances and incidentals on the following streets and ave-nues: ~ ro s. Navajo St. w. Union Ave. S. line W. Stanford Ave. S. Clay St. N. line w. Tufts Ave. W. end of the Platte River Bridge Section 5. Improvements Authorized. The construction or installation of the street paving, curb and gutter and sidewalk improvements in and for the District, as shown by the plans, spec i fications and maps thereof, approved by the City Council of the City, is hereby authorized and ordered, the material to be used in the construction of said improvements to be in accordance with such maps, plans and specifications. Section 6. Assessment of Costs. The probable tota l cos t of the improvements to be constructed or installed i s $549,100; it is proposed that the City of Englewood will pay approximately $200,000; the remainder of the cost will be assessed aga i l,'ls t the property within th e district and spec i ally benefited by the construction and i nstallation of the improvements. The approximate share of the total cost to be assessed per front foot aga i n s t an y lot or tract of land fronting or abutting on sa i d impro v ment a wi l l be as more part i cularly set forth in the re sol u- tion passed and adop ted o n Fe br u ar y 7, 1983, and which i s i ncor- por ted herein by s p ecific reference . Section 7. Payment of Assessments . ~o~ill b du and pay ble ~o~ithou and ~o~ithin The a ss samenta thirty (30) days fro and a ter the !inal publicat on of the Ord1nanc aas s ng the whole cos of said improv nts against th real property 1n th 0 a rlct. In th ev n any o wn r of r al estat shall a11 o p y h ~o~hole o such ssessment againa his or h r -3 - • I • • - • • • • property within said thirty (30) days, then the whole cost of the improvements so assessed against such property shall be payable in ten ( 10) equal annual installments of principal. The first of such installments of principal shall be due and· payable at such time as will be determined in the assessing ordinance and the remainder of said installments shall be due and payable successively on the same day in each year thereafter, until all are paid in full. The rate of interest to be paid on unpaid and deferred installments will be established by ordinance to be adopted by the City Council at a later date. Section 8. Special Improvement Bonds. By virtue of and pursuant to said laws and the Charter and the Municipal Code of the City, local improvement bonds of the City shall be issued for the purpose of paying for the local improvements described in this Ordinance, in an amount not to exceed the cost and expenses of said improvements, including engineering, legal and incidental expenses, as provided by law. The bonds shall be issued based upon estimates approved by the City Council, and as authorized by an Ordinance to be passed by the City Council at a later date. The maximum rate of interest on special improvement bond s f or Paving District No. 29, shall not exceed thirteen ( 13) per cen t per annum. The bonds and the interest hereon shall be payab le out of special assessments to be levied against the real property included within the District and specially benefited by the i mprovements to be constructed or installed. Section 9. General Benefits. The Ci ty Counc il her e by fin d s and determine s that t he i mprovem e nt s pro po s ed to be con- structed and inst a lled will co n fer a special be n efit upon the property within the District a nd a gen r al benefit upon the City as a whole . Section 1 0 . Severability. Th t if any one or more a ctions or par ts of th1s Ordinanc sh ll b djudged un nforce- bl o r 1n valid , such judgment sh ll no af c , imp ir or lnval- idate the rema ining provisions of this Ordinance, it being he in ntion tha the various provisions hereof are a verable. 4 - • I • • - • • • • Section 11. Hearing. In accordance with the City Charter and Municipal Code of the City, the City Council shall hold a public hearing on th i s ordinance, befor~ final passage, at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, April 4, 1983. Section 12. publication and Effective Date. This Ordinance, after its final passage, shall be numbered and record- ed, and the adoption and publication shall be authenticated by the signature of the Mayor and the Director of Finance, ex-officio City Clerk-Treasurer, and by the Certificate of Publication. This ordinance shall become effective thirty ( 30 l days after publica- t i on following final passage . I ntroduced, read in full , and passe d o n first read i n g on the 21st day of March, 1 98 3. P u b li shed as a Bill for an Ordi n a n ce on t h e 23rd day of March , 198 3. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 18th day of April , 1983. Published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1983, on the 20th day of April , 1983. ------ Eugene L. Ot~s, Mayor A test: ex officio city Clerk-Treasurer I, G ry R. H~gb , x off~cio City Clerk-Tre City of Engl wood, Colorado, hereby cer ~ v tha h bove and oregoing i a ru , ccura e and com ~ le e"copy of Ordinance No. , Series of 1983. Gary R. Higb -5- • I • • • • - BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. ~ SERIES of 1983 COUNCIL BILL NO. 17 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW AN ORDINANCE CREATING PAVING DISTRICT NO. 29 IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF STREET PAVING, CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS IN PAYMENT FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS; AND SETTING FORTH OTHER DETAILS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City Council of Englewood, Colorado, pursuant to the Charter and the Municipal Code of the City, and the Laws of the State of Colorado, hereby finds and determine s that there exists a necessity for the creation of Paving Di strict No. 29, in the City, and the construction and installation the rein of street paving, curb and gutter and sidewalk improvements, together with necessary incidentals on certain streets in the City; and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing co ncern ing the creation of t h e District and the construction and installation of the improvements therein has been published once a week for thre con s ecutive wee k s in the Englewood Sentin 1, a newspaper of general c1rculation in th City, and in ddition, a notice has been mai led , postage prepald, to each known o wner of real property within the proposed Distr1c : and WHEREAS, at the t1me and plac s t forth in the notice, th Ci y Council me n op n s ssion for the purpose of hearing any objections or pro es s ha m1qh be made ga1na th propos d dis r1ct or he mprovem n a o be construe ed or installed: and - - • • • BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. Creation of the District. That a special improvement district for the construction, installation or im- provement of the improvements hereinafter described, is hereby created and established in accordance with the Charter and the Munic ip al Code of the City, and the Laws of the State of Colorado, and shall be known and designated as wPaving District No. 29". All proceedings heretofore taken and adopted in connection with the District are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. Section 2. Engineering Plans and Specifications. That the engineer 's reports, together with all of the details, specifi- cations, estimates, maps and schedules thereto attached or ap- pended, are hereby approved and adopted. Section 3. District Boundary. The e xtent of the District to be assessed for the cost of the improvements and the area to be included within the boundary of the District, shall be all the real property specially benefited, and fronting or abutt- ing on the streets and avenues between the termini hereinbefore described, including the real property within one-half (1/2) block of such streets and avenues. Adjustments for the assessmen of costs will be made for irregular and odd-shaped lots and parcels of property. Sec ion 4. Oeser ipt ion of Improvem nts. The k 1nd of improvements and the str ts and avenues on which such improv - m n s shall b constructed or tns all d shall b as follows: 1. s. no and nu s: s. s. s. s. s. v - -2 - • • 00 • • • 2. Necessary grading and excavation, paving with 8" compacted gravel base course and 3" asphaltic con- crete surface, concrete walks, curb and gutter where not already installed; together with appurtenances and incidentals on the following streets and ave- nues: FI01 ro S. Navajo St. w. Union Ave. S. line W. Stanford Ave. S. Clay St. N. line w. Tufts Ave. w. end of the Platte River Bridge Section 5. Improvements Authorized. The construction or inst allation of the street paving, curb and gutter and sidewalk improvements i n and for the Dist rict, as shown by the plans, specifications and maps thereof, approved by the City Council of the City, is hereby author ized and ordered, the materia l to be used in the construction of said improvement s to be i n accordance with such maps, plans and specifications. Section 6. Assessment of Costs. The probable total cost of the improvements to be constructed or installed is $549, 100; it is proposed that the City of Englewood will pay approximately $200,000; the remainder of the cost will be assessed against the property within the district and specially benefited by the construction and inst a llation of the lmprovements . The approximate share of the total cost to be assessed per front foo aga1nst any lot or tract of land fron ing or abutting on said mprovements will be as more particularly set forth in the r solu- tion passed and adopt d on February 7, 1983, and which is incor- porated herein by specific reference. Section 7. Payment of Ass The assess ents w ll b due and payabl without d mand thirty (30) days fro and after he final publication of th Ordinance aaaeaa ing he whol cos in the Oistric tail to pay h of aa1d i provementa against th real proper y In th v nt any owner of re 1 esta shall whole of such assessment ag ina his or h r 3 -I • • -• • - property within said thirty (30) days, then the whole cost of the improvements so assessed against such property shall be payable in ten ( 10) equal annual installments of principal. The first of such installments of principal shall be due an~ payable at such time as will be determined in the assessing ordinance and the remainder of said installments shall be due and payable successively on the same day in each year thereafter, until all are paid in full. The rate of interest to be paid on unpaid and deferred installments will be established by ordinance to be adopted by the City Coun c il at a later date. Section 8. Special Improvement Bonds. By virtue of and pursuant to said laws and the Charter and the Municipal Code of the City, local improvement bonds of the City shall be issued for the purpose of paying for the local improvements described in this Ordinance, in an amount not to exceed the cost and expenses of said improvements, including engineering, legal and incidental expenses, as provided by law. The bonds shall be issued based upon estimates approved by the City Council, and as authorized by an Ordinance to be passed by the City Council at a later date. The maximum rate of interest on special improvement bond s fo r Paving District No. 29, sha l l not ex c eed thirteen (13 ) per ce n t per annum. The bonds and the i ntere st t hereon sha ll be payable out of special assessment s to be levied against the rea l pro p erty included with i n the Distr ic t and speci all y ben efit e d by he i mprovement s to be constructed or i n s t alled. Sect i o n 9. Genera l Bene f it s. Th e Cit y Council hereby fi nd s a nd dete rtlli ne s that the 1mp r oveme nt s p roposed o b con- st r ucted and inst a lled will confer a special benefit upon the property with n he District and a gene r al benefit upon the C1ty as a whole. s ction 10. Sev rabllity . That if any one or or section or par s of his Ord nance shall be adjudg d un nforce- ble or inval d, such JUdg en sh 11 no aff ct, impair or inval- lda e th r 11a ning prov nons o this Ordinanc , it b inq h 1ntention ha he var;iou s provts ons her of are sev r bl • . - .. • I • • • • Section 11. Hearing. In accordance with the Ci t y Charter and Municipal Code of the City, the City Council shall hold a public hearing on this ordinance, befor~ final passage, at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, April 4, 1983. Section 12. Publication and Effective Date. This Ordinance, after its final passage, shall be numbered and record- ed, and the adoption and publication shall be authenticated by the signature of the Mayor and the Director of Finance, ex-off i cio City Clerk-Treasurer, and by the Certificate of Publication. Th is ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days after publica- tion following final passage. Introduced, read in full, and passed on firs t reading on t he 21st day of March, 1983. Published as a Bill f o r an Ordinance on the 23 rd day of March, 1983 . Read b y title and passed on final readin g on the 1 8 th day of April , 1983 . P ublished by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1983 , o n the 20th day of April , 1983 . ------ A es Eugen ex off1cio ci y Clerk-Treasurer I, G ry R. Hi e, ex officio Ci y Clerk-Tr aaurer of h Ci y of En 1 wood , Color do, h reby c r i y h h bov nd or Oln a ru , ccura e and comPlete copy of Ordinanc No. ______ , ri a of 1983. Gary R. Hi gb -s~ • I • ORDINANCE NO.~---- SERIES OF 1983 • • • BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 19 INTRODUC~:! COUNCIL MEMBER. __ ~~~·~~------ AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO, GRANTING CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AN EASEMENT TO USE SCHOOL PROPERTY FOR A STORM WATER DETENTION AREA AND ESTABLISHING OTHER RELATED TERMS AND CONDITIONS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 21, SERIES OF 1982. WHEREAS, the City of Englewood has embarked upon a program of limiting Little Dry Creek to the confines of its channel in the City of Englewood; and WHEREAS, the goal is to prevent loss of public and private property to flood damage; and WHEREAS, School District No. 1, Arapahoe County, Colorado, Englewood Schools, desires to assist in controlling flood wate rs in the City of Englewood to protect, among other things, the school tax base; and WHEREAS, the City of Englewood desires to cooperate with and protect the School Board; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COU NCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1 . There is hereby approved an agreement titled 1 Agreemen t Storm Water Detention Area• between the City o f Englewood , Colorado, and Schoo l District No . 1, Arapahoe County, Colo r do, as attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit A. Section 2 . follows: The aforedescrlb d Agreement g ne ra lly provides as 1) School's use for educatio 1 purpose is paramount use. 2) A nonexclusive easem nt ia granted by the School 0 atric to the Clty of Englewood for tor• water detention over prop rty owned by the School District and used for athletic purposes. 3) The School District shall review and approve final pla for construction o the • or• w ter de en lon area. 4) Bo rd o use o City shall save • d hold h rmless chool Dlatric Directors alnat ny d all cl •• rlain9 fro he d te tion r a. 1 • tid t ta City 's I • -• • • 5) City shall not use the property in a man n er that creates a nuisance; construction and maintenance shall be coordinated with the School Board and shall be at City's expense; City recognizes the need for open space and shall attempt to provide for the same al o ng historic Little Dry Creek; City shall not make alterations unless approved by the School Board; City shall cause no liens to attach to the property; School's use shall not hinder capacity of the storm water holding area. 6) City shall properly insure the property. Section 3 • There is hereby repealed Ordinance No. 21, Series o f 1982. Section 4 • The May o r o f the City of Englewood, Colorado, is hereby authorized to affix his signature to the aforedescribed Agreement for and i n behalf of the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorad o , a n d the ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer is authorized to attest the same. In troduced, r e a d in f ull , and pa s sed on f i r s t readi n g on th e 1 8th da y o f April, 19 8 3 . Published a s a Bil l for a n Ordinance o n the 20th day o f Apr il , 1 983. Eug ene L. Ot is , May o r At teat: ex officio city Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and fore9oin9 ia a true, ecurate nd complete copy of 8111 for an Ordinance, introduced, read ln full, and passed on first readln9 on the 18th day of April, 1 83. Gary R. Higbee • I • • - ,, / , • • • AGI~EP.MEN'r l:l 'l'OHM WA 'rEK DC:'rEN'riON AHEA ·rur:; Atii{C:~M~N'r, mutlu ancl ctnterad into thl s -·---·---···· dlly of -------' 198_, by and between SCHOOL DIS 'rR!C 'l' NO. l, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO, by and through its Uoard of C:ducation, hereinafter referred to as "District," and tho CI~Y OF ENGLE WOO D, COLORADO, a Colorado municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City," WI"l'N~SSt:TH WHEREAS, the School District ia the owner of certai n real property located in the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, which Ia adjacent to Little Dry Creekt and WH EH~AS, the City desires to construct a storm wa ter deten tion area as part of a public drainage project to provide f o r • " UO -year flood" protection from Little Dry Creek, adjoin ing the afores aid property, and • WHEHI::AS, the aforesaid property ia suitable for the construction of th11 neoded storm water detent ion aroa whic h is In the bent interests of the citizens of the District and tha City by ollmin atlng r isk of damago to livos and propurty from Littlu Dry Creek floodin91 and WHEREAS, the District can continue tho uso of tho aforesaid pr~pe rty for ita general purpoaea following the reconstruction th raof to be sod con cu rrently aa a storm water detention ru a1 and • I • • • • - WHEH~AS, the City is u public bouy pur 1;uunt to C.:.H .:;, I'J '/J , 32-11-101 et seq,, and is a subdivision of the State pur~uant t o C ,H,S . 1Y7J, 2~-J~-101; and WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City to acquire an easement in certain proparty of the District in connection with the construction of the storm water detention pond as part of the drainage projectr NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other c;ood anu valuable consideration, hereinafter t~ppcariny, thu IHirti v ~; hereto agree as follows1 1, GRANT OF EASEM~, A, The District hereby grants and conveys to the City a none xclusive easement for the purpose of constructio n, use, and maintenanc e of a storm water detention pond upon the District property described as follows: A parcel of land located in the Northeast l/4 of Section 3, Town ahip 5 South, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Arapahoa County , Colorado, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Weat line of Lot 30, ~lock 5, Higgins Englewood Gardena, from whic h the Northwest corner of said Lot 30 bears North a distance of 5,57 feetr thence South along the West line of Lots 30 to 25 (inclusive) said Block 5 a diat•nce of 174.43 feet to the North line of that parcel clescribed in Book 1063 at pagll 264; thonce Weat, 13 feet along the North line of that parcel described in Book 1063 at page 264r thence South along a line 167 feet East of and parallel to the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeaat 1/4 of Section 3 a diatance of 425 feetr thence eat 5 feetr thence South along a line 172 feet !eat of and parallel to the West line of said SE l/4 NE l/4 a distance of 95 feetr thence !eat 45 feetr thence South 12 f ~tr thence ~••t along a line 532 feet South of and para llel to tho orth line of said 8& l/4 N! 1/4 a dia nov 2 • • ) • • • ,. • of J4U feet1 thence South 38 degrcofl 44 rn1nut~H l':<~:lt lJ'J feet; thence South 76 degrees 47 minutut; l::.:t:l~ llU [u\:~ tllllt '-' or less to a point on the North line of vacated l::asl: Lehig lt Avenue being also the South line of thoso parcel s uuu~o:ri!Jud in Book 927 at page 29, which point llu :; ;DIJ fuut We :;L nr thu ~outhwu:.;t ~.:ornor of thllt (J<H~o:el du :;~:r liJuu in lh1uk UJJ at page 5421 thence South 45 feet1 thence East 393.1 feel: parallel to the North line of vacated East Lehigh Avenue to a point on West line of the alley in ~lock u, Mansfield Addition1 thence North along said Wo:.;t lino 4~ foot to thu Southeast corner of that parcel described in ~ook U55 at page 5421 thence East along the North line of East Lehigh Avenue 27 feet1 thence North 240.4 feet more or less along the line 27 feet East of and parallel to the l::ast lines of those parcels described in Book 855 at page 542 and Book 1403 at page 41 to a point on the Southerly line of Lot ) Sandra's Subdivision which lies 9.61 fc.wt Wo:;t of tllu 1~-t :lL line of Lot J1 thence North along a line purullul to und 9.61 feet West of said East line 196 fvet to a point on the North line of Lot 31 thence Northwesterly along said North line 15,58 feet to the Northeast corner of that property described in Book 1282 at page 5791 thence Northwesterly along the North line of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Sandra's Subdivision a distance of 183.2 !eat to the Northwest corner of Lot l, Sandra'• Subdivision, thence Northwesterly along the South line of that parcel described in ~ook 4~2 at page 592, Arapahoe County Recorda a distance of 327.2 feet to a point1 thence Northwesterly to a point on tho South line of Lot 25, Block 6, Higgins Englewood Garde ns, from which the Southwest corner of said Lot 25 bears We at 70,92 faet1 thence Northwaatarlr along the North line of that parcel described in Book l 24 at page 104 Arapahoe County Recorda a distance of 75.2 feet of the Northwest corne r of said Lot 251 thence Northwesterly to a point on the East line of Lot 23 of said Block 6, from which the Southeast corner of said Lot 23 bears South a distnce or 2 feat1 thence Northwestarlr along the North lino of that parcel described in Book 094 at page 600, Arapahoe County Recorda a distance of 132.85 feat to a point on the Wast 1 ne or Lot 22 of said Block 6 from which the Northwest corner of said Lot 22 bears North a distance of 3 faat1 thence orthwastarly to a point on the East line of Lot 28, Block S, Higgins Englawoo4 Oar4ans, fro• which the orthaast corner of sa14 Ldt 28 bears North a distance or S .72 fa a t1 thence orthwaatarly along thv South llna or t h at parcel daecribtd in look 1124 at page lU3, Arapahoe County Racor4s, a distance of 145.09 feat to the Point o f ija9i nn ln9, Arapahoe County, Colorado. 3 I • -• • • B. Storm water detention area, a s used ln tlti ~• Agreement, shall be a reduction in the existing e l ev ation o( tltc uf oresa i cl property by u[l(Hoxlmately 1;ix (6) t o ciylttuun (lU) l (!(J L, in order to form the bottom and sides of the detention area, a l ong with other necessary excavation and construction goneral l y in accordance with the attached sketch, designated ~xhibit A, prepa red by Mc~aughlin Water Engineers. It is understood and agr ee d th a t final plana for this water detention area have boon approve d by the Dist rict. 2, DURATION OF EASBM!NT AND RBVIRS ION OF INTERES 't, A. The duration of the aforesaid easement shall be pe rpetual, subject to written modifications upon the mut ua l consent of bot h th e Dis t rict a nd the City, or their successor s , o r tho te r mi natio n by the City of the aforesaid easement in said pro pe rty. B. Wi t h o ut regard to any other provisions of t his Agreement, it ia the intenti o n of t he par ti e s t ha t t his grant of easeme nt not be r evo ke d. c. The duration o f t he occupancy of t h e w at~r detention area by flood waters ia under s t oo d to ba te a po r a r y a nd int e r- mittent, dependent on weather condition s . The City aqreas to pro ptly clean up any debris and dapoalts in the datentlon area due to stor water when aaid water has bean returned to ~lttle Dry CreeK a d pay the coata thereof, • • • • - J • £9.!i~L~El!i'lr r t!.t!. A. The City shall pay as consideration to th e District '} the sum or: On!.! Dollar ($1) per yeur; City sh.ull tran:o;[ur L o District that property described in Exhibit B upon execut ion of this Agreement and an easement on that property described in Exhibit c. Receipt of the sum of One Dollar ($1) and oth er good and valuable consideration is hereby confessed and acknowledged. ... ' 4. HOLD HAR~~· A. 'rhe City agrl!os fully to eave harmlLHH~ anc.l tleEunc.l tliu District and the District's Board of Directors personally from all suits, actions, demands, or claims in law or in equity, arising out of the execution of this Agreement, or the design, engi neering, use, construction, and maintenance of the real property herein described. The City shall be responsible for any liability resulting from any litigation and shall pay the coets of suit, attorneys' fees, appellate costa, and any other costa or expenses which may be assessed against the District and the Distric t's Uoard of Directors personally as a result of any suit, demand, or claim filed concerning this Agreement. 5 . Q!!d.Q..~'tL2,ti!,_Qt_~L!!. A. Purpose . The premise& shall be used solely for th facility and purpose de ribed in para9raph 1 above or for auch o ther purpoa s aa the Diatrict may approve. The City will not carry on o r permit upon the premises any offensive, noisy, or d a ngaroua activity or any nuiaance to the public or to tho 5 • I • • . , • • • adjoining neighbors. Thc.t City will pay, upon tl unw11d , iJ11 y tlo.IHidlJ\::, t:l the prumisos caused by the misuse of same by C lt y or C l t y':; ag~:~nt!i or by City's employees. 'l'bl:.l City shull not c.tXllr l:l:;u <Jny control over the routine use of the facilities by the District. The City shall not usu the facility to detain water uxce~t whon in its best judgment said use is necessitated by virtue of storm or other emergency conditions. B, Construction and Maintenance, 1. ~he storm water detention area tl uul:r l b etl abo v u shall be constructed by the City at ita sole cost and expe n3 e according to approved plans and specifications, ~he City shall main tain the banks from erosion (deterioration a nd th o lik o), ret aining wall, spillway, and drainage system (including s to r m drai nage pump) which are necessary for control of storm wa te r s • and be responsible for cost» necessary for use and mai n tenanc c.t of • the d escribed storm water detentio n pond facilities aol~ly a nd e xclusive l y necessary for co n trol of storm wat e rs. The Dis tr ict shall maintain tho pr uos box, r ea trooms, co n ce ssion stand , maintenance sto r age a rua , b le acher s and the ba ll /p la y fields cs tho Dis trict detormlnos necuasary so long as the capaclty oC tho storm water detention area ia not diminiahed or infringed upon . 2. It ia anticipated th a t conatruction hall t a ke o~e (1) year to complete from letting o f b id a for construction and r~turnlng Cacllitle to a condition usablo b y the District. City • I • • • • • • agrees to take whatever steps are necessary to retur n L1c: i tl t 1 cJ ~; 1 \• a condition usable by District as near as practicable as that currently on the property and ln~;tall pcrmt~ncn l: und o r <Jr ound sprinkling syste~, all at City cost. The City shall provide District with City park facilities necessary for Dl~trlct 1 ~> u~c to include those functions found on Exhibit D at the locations designated therein, for a period during the construction and in tliu future at such times as the water detention area is filled with storm water and not returned to a usable condition for Uiutrict functions within five (5) days of ita temporary and intermitten t use by storm waters. The City 1 a obli~ation to provide the Distric t with City park facilities during temporary and intermittent use of the area by storm waters shall continue until the City has romov od any debris and deposita remaining after storm water has been returned to Little Dry Creek from the area, The City agr euu to ~ay all transportation coats using District's transportation facilities based on actual coat of transporting students and faculty to and from school located adjacent to site of storm water detentio n area to the appropriate City facilities deai~natad in Exhibit D, said actual cost based on District•• normal unit operating expanse for transportation facilities, on a par pupil per milo basis, plus additional equipment and hirin~ of additional drivers necessary to carry out said purpoaoa , the intent baing for tho District to recover not lass than the exact coats of such transportation. 7 • • -• • • 3. District has approved t ho c o n~l:r ucl:ion ~;clied ul" J a nd City l>hall require sufficient security fro m the co ntructor to ,_ OO!:lUr<:: prompt Cl<I:!CUtion of the work. l:loth p<t r l:i u :; unde n;Ldil\J tlidl. construction may take longer than one year but City shall ensu r e that contractor, in no event, shall take more than onu a nd one-hal[ (1 1/2) yeara to complete construction of the detent i on pond facility. 4. A, Shared Maintenance. For a period of t wo (2) years after the completion of construction, City ~;hull muintilin tlw turf and landscaping within the easement area described in paragraph 1.A. Maintenance shall only mean watering, applying appropriate fertilisers and chemicals, mowing, turf, tree an d sh r ubbery care, and landscaping. City ahall maintain spr inkler system during thia two-year period. City and District s ha ll divide co s t of maintenance on the beals of District payi ng Fifty Pe rcent (50 \) o r Twelve Thousand Dollara ($12,000) per year, whiche ver ls less, and City to pay t he r em aind e r. After the tw o-year period, City and Dis tr ic t will re negotia te al locat i on of maintenance provisions as con ta in e d in t h ia paragraph 5 ,B.4 ,A. If agreement between the partl ea a a to the allocation of maintenance coata and maintenance prov1a1ona is not made by the end of the two-year period, then either party may requeat arbitration of the allocation of aintenance ooata and maintenance provlaiona by the American Arbitration Aaaoolatlon purauant to the rulo of the American Arbitration Aaaociation. The arbitration lh 11 8 • I • • • • • '• consist of allocation cost of malntonunco bul:wuun tllu twr tit!!; ul' the items contained in this paragraph s.s.4.A. accordiny to thu u~u of the detention area by the respective partie~:~. ~'urtller, thu arbitration shall, at the request of either party, deturmine which party or whether. a third par.ty shall do the maintenance of the items in this paragraph S.B.4 .A. Prior to a determination by tho arbitration the parties shall continue maintenclncu pur:;u<.~nt to tlli>; paragraph S.B.4.A. B. Maintenance of the press box, rastrooms, concession stand, maintenance storage area, bleachers, ball/playiny fields (other than the turf), cleanup (other than from storm water), utilities (other than water for turf) shall be the soh and exclusive responsibility of District. It is further intended that the City shall maintain the banks (from erosion and the like), retaining walla, spillways, and drainaqe system (including ator• drainage pu•p). 5. Major repair or reconstruction of an improvement the detention area shall be aa •utually a9reed upon between tho ~urtles at tho time ropalr or reconstruction la necessary or deairab e provided, however, that each party shall be responsible 9 • I • • '· I • • • • for the cost of major repair or reconstruction o[ un impr o vt.:u le nl. resulting from their sole use or negligence, City shull be responsible for repuir or reconstruction of iJn improvumunt dt:lllld<J u due to flooding of the detention area. c. Little Dry Creek Improvements. The City agrees to construct improvements generally in conformance to Sellaru & Grigg s Consulting Engineers Report No, 75UlY-44 dated February, 1970 excluding the options to construct upstream dams (Exhibit ~). The City recogni~es the neeu anu de~irobility of provl~lnv opur1 space and a pedestrian and bicycle link between the District's property and the South Platte River. The City intends to develop appropriate routes in the vicinity of historic Little Dry Creek for such a link. Further, City recogni&es the need to improv~ tho general appearance of downtown Englewood and intends to develop aesthetic standards that are people oriented with landscaping and open spaces applicable to both public and private development in the City and consider ordinance changes to accomplish this godl, D, Alterations, With the exception of the interim facilities and initial co~pleted construction of the storm water detention area, the City will not make or permit any alterations or a dd i tions to the premises or place any additional structures, facilities or equipment on the pre•ises without the District's prior written approval. The City shall submit plana for minor remod eling to the Board of Education for approval. No major r em odeling will be permitted that would preclude the District' usu 10 • I • , • • • • of the real property for its general purposes pr ior to t ills Agreement. Upon termination by City of the above-de s cr ibed easement in said property, City shall restoru or ru(J1at:u illly portion of the premises damaged or otherwise affected by such alterations, additions, structures, facilities, or equipment, unless such restoration repair was waived by the District at the time approval was given for such addition or alteration, The District shall approve construction schedules and the City shal l requ1ru sufficient security from contractor to ensure ~romp t execution of work. E. Compliance with Law. The City will comply with all applicable federal, state, county, municipal and other laws, ordinances, rules and regulations relating to all or any part o r the following: (i) the premises, (11) the operation of the facil- 1 ty conductttd thereon, ( i 1 i) the maintenance of the premises ; and the City shall refrain from uain9 the premises in any way in violation of such law, ordinance, rule or regulation. F. Liana. The City will keep the premises free of all liens end/or claims to be placed on the pre•ises, for whatever reason, to be removed within thirty (30) days after City has n owledge of such llen1 and City a9rees to release, indemnify and hold the District harmless from and a;ainat such liena and/or cl im a. 11 I • • f • • • • G. Surrender of Premises, City will, upon t<!r111lnu l: I on of its easement in said property, surrend~r tho premlueu to tho Db;trict, In a qood ordor and cClndltion, and wlwn il [J[)lil:,illll!, in cornpliance with the provisions of paragraph 5 (d). 6. COMPATI I!,LE l!!lt_i!.Y DIS'rRI.C'£. District may make improvements and undertak~ construct ion on the above-described property ao long as such improv~mon ts and construction do not reduce the capacity of the site for storm water detention. District shall request of City itH approval an~ City shall not withhold approval provided the proposed construction and improvement satisfy the storm water detention requirements herein. District's use of the property for ita present purposes aH athletic field and for subsequent compatible uaea approved by City shull bo deemed dominant and accommodated by City, if possible. 7. CLAR15!.Q..N STREE •r ..f.~VING CONSTRUCTION. A. Should City or other entity ever pave or construct Improvements on Clarkson Street and should a method of asuessment against property abutting improve•ents be made, City shall pay full coat of any aaaeaament for that real property owned by City abutting Clarkson Street. 8. INSURANC~. District shall continue its insuranoe coverage on the rea l property described herein during its use of the property for ts general purposes. 12 • I . -• • • 0 City shall, in addition, include the detentio n "r'u' r t:o~l ~ property in its insurance coverage for loss resulting fro m till.) usu '·1 of said property as a storm wntar detention ure ;1 for 1 i<tiJi I i Ly i11 excess of the coverage maintained by District at City's expense, Said excess coverage shall be obtained and kept in force dur ing tho term of this Easement Agreement and shall include, ~~~-~LL~, u comprehensive public liability insurance covorQgc, inuurlny thu District and City against any liability arising out of th e use, occupancy and maintenance, anu all areas appurt enunt tlter ~.:tu IJy City in excess of coverage provided by District, City shall deliver to District, prior to right of entry, copies of pol icies of insurance required herein, or certificates evidencing the existence of such insurance with a loss payable clause satisfactory to Distri ct, No policy shall be cancellable or subject to reductio r of coverage , 9. BINDINO ON SUCCESSORS ~0 ASSIONS, -------- The terms and conditions of this Agreement ahal be b ding on the successors and assigns of both parties hereof. 0 , ~t~lES UPON BRE~CK, ln the event of breach of the terms and conditions hereof by either party, the other party shall be entitled to specific perfor 1noe of this Agree ent or, in the •lternat1ve, the non- bra chlng party shall be entitled to dam•ges suffered aw a result of the breach, District ay not revoke or cancel this Agr eement in 13 • I • -• • • t he event of City's breach but must resort to the reme<li t:~D horwi tt provided. 11, ~9..\L~ ACHI::I::MEN'r IU:VOKI::D , The A9reement dated the 2nd day of February, 1902 is hereby revoked. This agreement supersedes the ~obruary ~. 19U2 Agreement in ita entirety. IN WITNESS WKBREOF, District has caused thesB pr~sBnts to be executed by the president of ita Board of &ducation and attested by the secretary thereof, and City has caused these presents t o be executed by the Mayor and attested by the Director of Finance ex officio City Clark-Treasurer. AT 'r&ST1 Secretary ,t.T 'r&STt Cary R. Kiv6ee, Director of Finance ex officio City Clerk- Treasurer SCHOOL DISTRICT NO, 1 1 ARAPAHO& COUNTY, COLORADO By ______________ __ --Praalde"nt of ita Board of Education CITY or &NGLIWOOD, COLORADO a •unicipal corporation BY-.----~~~--~ luvene L. Otla, Mayor------ • I • • • • • I . • • • EXHI BI 'r B ~P~C!/\L W/\ltlt/\N'l"i Ul~IW This Deed made this day of , 1982 be tween the CIT'i OP' ENGLEWOOD, COLC5'R'ADO, a ColoradoiiiUnTCTpal corporation wit h City Hall at 3400 South Elati Stroot, 11:nglowoou, County of Ar apah ov , State of Colorado 80110, hereinafter "grantor", anu ::;cuuot. D!S'l'IU C'I' NO, 1, ARAPAHOE COUN'!''i, COLORADO, 4101 South Bannock Street, Englewood, County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado OUllU, hereina [t ur "grantee:, WITNESSETH, that the grantor, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS AND OTHER GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERA'rroN, to thu grantor in hand paid by the grantee, the receipt whereof i:; herlo!by uontuuuuu ;and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyuu und by tl1u 1;u presents does grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the grantee, its heirs and assigns forever, the following real property situate, lying and being in the County of Arapahoe and State of Colorado, to wit: A parcel located in the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 3, Townwhip 5 South, Range 60 West of the Gth P.M., Arapahoe County, Colorado, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast Corner of Lot 6, Sandru '~ Subdivision/ thence North 66 degrees 15 minutes Wast alo ng thu Southwesterly line of said Lot 6, 141,42 feat to the true Point of Beginning/ thence continuing North 66 degrees 15 min utes West 29,5 feet, thence South along the We st property line 252.3 feot more or less to the North right of way line of East Lehigh Avanue1 thence &ast along said line 27 feat1 thence North 240,4 feet more or leas to t h o Point of lieginning, Said parcvl contains 6,652 square feet or 0,153 acres more or less . The grantee hereby covenants and agrees that the roal property conve yed hereby shall be held and used for public educational purposes together with such other uses as the grantee determines necessary. Tog ether with all and singular the hereditaments and appur tenances thereunt o belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversion s, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thoro- O f/ and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whut- uoever , of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to thu abovu bargained premises, with the herecUtamenta and appurte nances, '1'0 HAVE A D TO HOLD, the said premises above bargained and d oribed with th appur toncncu , unto the 9rantee, ita heira and assi9n s forovar • • I • • • • • • Ancl the gr<~ntor, for itself and i t11 succt!ssor ~:;, c ovenant :; .md "'J, <.!t,~; to and with the grantee, ita heirs and assigns, thu abovu bur~a inud premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the rJ r an tee, i t1; heirs and assigns against all and every purson or pcnwn:; lawl:ully claiming or to claim the whole or any part tht!roof, by, l:liroutJII nr under tho grantor 1 to WAHRAN'l' AND FOR~VI::H DIU~I::NI>, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor has caused its corporate name to b0 hereunto subscribed by ita Mayor, and ita corporate ~oul to bu hcru - unto affixed, attested by its City Clerk, the clay and year first uGov u written. Atteat1 STATE OF COLORADO COUNT~ OF ARAPAHO~ ) ) CITY OF BNOLBWOOO a Colorado municipal corporatio n ss. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged befor e me this day of 1 19 by Eugene L, Otis as Mayor and Gary·~A-.~anl~gbee •• ~cT{~ty~C~l~e~r~k~o7l the~y of Englewood, Colorado. My Commission expirea1 rotir"YP"Usrrc:-----······-·· Addreaa1 3 I • • - •• /';> • • • EXHIBI'r C GRANT or PERPETUAL EASEMENT WHEREAS, the CITY OP ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, (City) is t he present owner of certain realty located within the City o f En g l ewood, County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, and WH EREAS, the City has requested SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 , ARA PA HOE COUNTY, COLORADO, (School District) to uae a portion of its real pr o perty for a storm water detent i on area and the Sc hool District ha s agreed to auch uae1 and WHERE AS , t he S c h ool District haa a need for aaid rea l property herein a ft e r d escr i bed for ita purpoae a, ow, THER PORE , Cit y of Ing l ewo od do e a hereby grant, bargain, and ael to School D1atr1ct No. 1, Ara pa ho e County, Colorado, a p rpetu al right of wa y and ea •em e nt ove r, a croaa, through, and ur.der , for the purpoaea a nd upon t h e con d itione her e in contained, the following deacrib e d realty a I • - , • • • A parcel located in the South l/2 of t he l~ort l luu s t 1/~ o l Section 3, Township 5 South, Range 66 WcHt o f tl1u Gt h P .M., /\r u{J a h oo Co unty, Colorado, cl e ucr i becl <HJ f Cll lo~n:: Beginning at a point 2.S feet West of the int e r ~e c tion o ~ the West right of way line of South Clarkson S tre et and t hu North riqht of way line of East Lehigh Avenuo; thun c e Wo ~t 56 feet along the North line of East Lehig h ; t hunce Nort h 179 feet parallel to the West line of South Clar kso n Street1 thence East 56 feet to a point 2.5 fee t We st o f t hu West line of Clar.kson Street, thence South 17Y f e ut to t hu Point of Beqinnin;. Thia eaaement contains 10,024 square feet or 0,23 ac r es, mora or loaa. The riqht of way and easement herein ;ranted shall be aMcluaive to the School District tor ita educational purposes, in cluding those purposes incidental to the School Distr i c t's pu rpoaea or conve n ient for the School Diatrict1 prov i ded , h ow ever, th o t if School Di strict or ita successors aver abando n tho uso o f t he same for all ot the aforesaid purposes, then and in t h a t event, all ri;hta ;ranted hereby shall terminate and the fee s im pl e title to t he ab o ve described realty shall no lon;er be oncumbured b y suc h ri ;h ts. The City further a;reea that it shall cause the realty su bject to th e e a s e men t herein ;ranted to be i mprov od t o su c h s tandard• •• preaentl y a;r eed upo n by the part i e a . Upo n comp l e tion of a uc h improve me n ts and conatruction and acceptance thereof by appro pr i a t e officials ot th e lohool D1 a tr1 o t, School Di s trict shall • I . -• • • th ereafter undertake to perform repair and mllintonancc upon !'Wid easement. Dated this _____ day of ------------' 1983, Attest: Gilryn~-trrgoee;-;;orrrc:ro-- city Clerk-Treasurer Attest: ~ Secretiry---------- STATE OP COLORADO COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE ••• CIT~ OF ~NG~~WOOD, CO~ORADO SCKOOL DISTRICT NO. l ARAPAKOE COUNT~, COLORADO sy ____________ ;;;&rdanr- of ita Board of Education The foregoing waa acknowledged before me by Eugene ~. Otis as Mayor and attested to by Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk- Trea surer, of the City of Englewood this---------day of ___________ , 198_. Notary P'Ub'fl"C ___ _ 3400 s. Blati, Englewood, co My Commiaaion expires& 3 • I • • - .. • • • • "•li ~Q W wW I;~~~~~~-~·~:,:::· .. · .. ·-\ ' .. Sil• Th• toroqolnq ••• ackno•l••••• bofo<• "" bY -·-·--····------· -----------··• -.nx ---------· •• _ ..... -• .--· Schoo ror.trr.;tilo. r,ii:iiP•h•• -eou.W..,;c;roraoo;··;:;; ... --······ •• y of _ _, u•-· ---- ) ) ) I • • -··-----···-H:ut~O lu.l w .. . . . ' .. ~. "'' ~ .. : ...... " • t1Yl \.'1 rroquon~y ,.l,.o of Year Prouun~ LocAtion liJ \:0 ll uuu u~ ---·----···-· -····- II 19h Schoo l toyt CaUy loa to IIUUUA ~ tQ uauuball Viol<l \l au un • ~·" I &occ u lind of Ootobtr · PArk .. . . I --------Ml 441 t Sc hool ·, CaUy 1.6 to lluvua t . to Ploo4 P1o1<1 UUtQU·~OUA I\' . ~u -·1o: · .. Cra 4 t 9 loc~or )rd Wk, 11f Oct . rnrl< . : ·-·--·-·····-····--·-···-. ··-·-···-·-····-···--.. l. Cra4u tHO and lluvuet U to Jraot1oa root• .. . • .. veuay rool.l>tU Cally Hovolllbn· J IMU P1olcl I . . Cudo 0 locoer .···· I i lluvun 11 to ' ,. .. •nd rool.l>aU .... o .... DIUy HovHIMr I ·~11111 I \, Croaa COIIIIV~ C&Uy I rau AU the vrounda . ·\ \ .. ' I ,, Clrh Vanh~ ....... • ;M&nh1 '" Praot1oo root• .. tn4 IOYI L&lftlll DIU~ lllid•M&ll INU P1t14 ... ~. H1 dd h IIIIH1 &M I Marth 1 • .. 11 19h sonool 'l'nok D&Uy , 11Ld•M&1' l\ad1IUI .. ----------------\l, Ondt I auolltll DIUy 1 Minh 1 to DOnny Miller HuUuv!uw lU : aid•Mil' Perk t'· 'l YUihY hYI DIUy j M&rth 1 • hloiN11 Denny•HUlor lO ...... u 111114-My ritW ,.o CoMun hy '""' DIU~ 10\ ,.,lilt •. ~or ri1U1 'I'll Do •• 10\ loU. Dll\orainod .. -. ...... u IC:Il\ loe&flll DIU~ ,_, , ..... IIIII hiiiNll "llcl ' To Do .. ' Vl ro"t h I ,P ,D,) f1oU1 nt111Nl~ o\hor 11t14o fer Cl t or a ~no<l ~•9 •on I 1 1114111rda fn .,ooun IIIII\ .... u •• -•' a 11 ""' .. ·, IOhldlllMI .. .~ rr.ye u L lhtn~oft 11111~ .. ,,. 10 .. I 1n Clloa1oo•POo\INU Cu utI lO approa. ....... l hiDU.. P11W ... ... OlleMo-Cerao .. ' of ....... u ruu I • • I .. ~" Clloa111-&11 .... ruu ' .. I ' ;, Dllllf M&roll 1 • ,_1111 \ ...... 1:1\1~ ' olld of My i:!:~ UoW 11 ), •u ai lt 111\M l 011 11 Dllll' IW>fl h l , to ·~--l' 1'1-I "''"'"""V•n .. IOU If • ••• Note G, •• ••• Noto 1 I . I • • • • , . • I ' SuPPLEMENT To 1976 LITTLE DRY CREEK ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT STUDY ENGLEWOOD~ CoLORADO CONIUt..TINO NOI N at FEBRUARY 1978 S & G No. 75019-44 SELLARDS & GRIGG, INC. 1~1 W, COV Alt • IUITI • • IOUial PLAIA I.A 00, COI.O aAOO .. 211 I ·ll'n ~-,<H II! II E • I . • I ' I I I I I I • • • .. Fe bruary 1978 Supplement to 1976 Little Dry creek Alternative De velopment Study Ge neral Discussion Following several public meetings and joint meetings betw~en the Englewood City Council and the Englewood School Board, at which the July, 1976, Alternative Development Study for Little Dry Creek within Englewood, Colorado, was presented and discussed, a new alternative (herein referred to as Alternative No. 5) was established. Alternative No. 5 mixes elements from the proposed solution in the McCall-Ellingson' Morrill, Inc., report entitled "Ma j or Drainageway Planning -Little Dry Creek," February, 1974, and Alternative No. 2 in the Sellards ' Grigg, Inc. July, 1976 s t udy . The 1974 study proposed a system of six upstream dams to reduce t h e peak runoff flow through Englewood to 4700 cfs during the pro- jected 100-year flood. The existing box conduit carrying Little Dry Creek underground near the Cinderella City shopping complex c ould be made to carry this flow with some modifications to the ups tream end of the box. Under this proposal, the existing lead sec t i on of 12' x 15' box would have a parallel cell added and a sin g le cell 12' x 18' box would be extended from the prese~t en- tran c e p o int at Girard Avenue and South Bannock Street to ~ast J e f ferson Avenue and South Sherman Street. The remainder of the Li ttle Dry Creek channel would be concrete lined from South Sher ma n Street to South Clarkson Street . The primary reasons for concret e lin i n g the channel were (1) to mainta i n t he max i mum amount o f energy in t he flowing water so that 4700 cf s c o uld pass through the b o x and (2 ) to util i ze existing channe l r ig hts -of-way s o that it would not b e necessary to acquire add i tional p roperty . All the alternatives i n the 1976 study were baaed on the assumpt ion that only two (Holly and Englewood) dams would e xist i n the fore - seeable future. For this cond i tion, a p eak runoff flow of 7000 cfs fo r the 1 00-year flood wa s p red i cted to be at South ClarKso n Street . Al ternat i ve No. 2 proposed to reduce the p eaK flow t o approximately 40 00 cf s throu gh a deten tion storage po nd on the sc hool property between South Logan Street and South Cla rKs on S ree on the south side of the Little Dry CreeK channel . The exis ting 1 ad s ction of 12' x 15 ' box condui would hav a parallel cell dded to handle this flow. Th r m ind r of the ch nn 1 from E st G1 rard Avenue and South Bannock Str t to South Cl rkaon Stree would be a grass lined channel tr ated as usabl op n apac Sev ral m jor obj ctions to the Alt rnativ No. 2 propo sal a re: (1) h d t ntion po n d would r quir xcavation in all ope n a r a north of the xisting football st d1um and school buildi n g s, (2) th xcavation was so d ep th i ncroach d on t h pr • n 1 v 1 of ground wa er n the r a, • I • I I I I I I I I I I I I • • .. • (3) the underground system for controlling ground water would re- quire full time pumping, (4) the size and depth of the detention pond area reduced the actual usable area for athletic fields from the present available space. Under Alternative No. 5, the City of Englewood would work with the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District to ultimately complete four dams upstream. These would include existing Englewood dam and proposed Holly, Berry and Prentice Dams. The additional dams would reduce the peak flow entering Englewood at South Clarkson Street to 5800 cfs. A detention pond is proposed on the school property with a capacity of 136 acre-feet. This detention pond would reduce the peak channel flow through Englewood to 3800 cfs which could be made to pass through the existing box condu it by adding the previously mentioned parallel cell to the upstream sec- tio n. The following is a more detailed discussion of the propos e d improve- ment s as they relate to this Alternative: Reach 1: In the 1976 Sellards ' Grigg report, each of the a lter- natives with improvements recommended a grass lined open channel from the South Platte River to Sante Fe Drive similar to that pro- posed in the 1974 study. This would also be a part of Al~ernat ive No . 5. Alternative No. 2 propos e d a grass lined open channel be- tween the outlet of the existing box conduit and the Santa Fe Rail- road bridge (easterly bridge at South Santa Fe Drive). However, in Alternatives No. 2 and 5 , with all the flow being carried by the box conduit, the option i s available for the existing 12' x 18' box to be extended and turned to direct the flow wes terly under the bridge. An energy dissipater would be required to reduce the velocity of the flow before it passed under the Santa Fe Railroad bridge . This option would raise the estimated cost for Reach 1 to $1 ,277,651.00, an i ncrease of $474,694.00. The primary benef it of extending the box this 600 feet would be to reclaim a p a rcel of land in a reasonably good location. However, this add itional expenditure of money could be made at a future date and would not be required at the outset of the improvement project. Re ch 2: The 12' x 18' portion of the box conduit would not r quire any modification. It is propos d that a parall 1 c ll be a dd d to the 12' x 15' portion betwe n the transition at the int rs c ion of Girard Avenu and South Cherok Str t and the box entranc southeast of th intersection of Girard Avenue and Sou h nnock Street. The parallel cell would b v ry simil r to that propos in the 1974 McC ll-Ellingson and Morill report and 1976 S llards & Grigg r port for Alt rnativ No. 2. (Th cost of thi parall 1 c 11 has b en includ d with R ach 3 estim te .) Thi 2 in r ch would be th sam as tha propos d for Al rn - he 1976 r port. Tha is, grass lind op,n ch nn 1 -2- • I • I I I I I I I I I • • from the entrance to the box conduit upstream to the bridge struc- ture at South Sherman Street. Consider ation has been given to extending the box structure to a point on the Little Dry Creek channel south of Hampden Avenue. The major advantage would be reclamation of about two acres of sur - face land within a growing commercial area of Englewood. The major disadvantage is that this choice would block re-establishing Little Dry Creek as an open channel through the City. This choice woul d probabl y preclude the City from ever re-establishing an open channel route through the commercial areas of Englewood between South Bannock Street and South Santa Fe Drive. The estimated cost for extend ing the box is $1,978,728 or $68,185 less than the grass lined channel. The construction cost is higher, but we estimated acquiring only an easement for the box extension and not the entire half block as required for the open channel which results in the lower esti- mated price . Reach 4: The channel in this reach would be the same as for Alter-nat~ve No. 2 of the 1976 report. The detention pond capacity would be reduced from about 225 acre-feet to 136 acre-feet. This reduc- tion in capacity would be achieved by raising the bottom of the previously proposed pond by four feet and by eliminating une of the area of the existing football practice field . This should raise the pond above the present ground water elevation and el im~n ate anticipated ground water problems for the athletic fields lo- cated in the detention pond. The estimated cost of the detention pond would be $1,367,355, a reduction of $316,15 4 from Alternat i ve No. 2. In the 1976 report , it was proposed to take water into the deten- tion pond by a side channel spillway using Jefferson Drive as the wei r and a bridge at Pearl Street to control the flow. On addi - tional investigation, it appears that if the extra flood water c an be brought under South Clarkson Street in a structure par lleling the existing bridge, it would be mor efficient in handlinq the w4ter and would liminate any wat r from overtopping South Cl rkso n S treet in a 100-year flood since the existing South Clarks on Str eet b r i dge is designed to pass only 5 000 c fs b fore th bridge i s ov r- topp d . -3- • • • • e xperience when the Englewood Darn improvements were made at a cost we ll under the estimated cost at that time. Hopefully, this finan- cial experience would carry over to these future dams. The Sellards ' Grigg scope of work did not include looking at any other improvements outside of Englewood. The 1974 study did this based on the six darns concept. Portions of the overall project beyond Englewood identified in the 1974 study are other channel improvements on Little Dry Creek and Greenwood Gulch including a better physical connection between the two east of Clarkson. None of these improvements have been included in the estimates except for the construction of Prentice and Berry dams. Other Considerations A valid argument against Alternative No. 5 is that it requires the estimated expenditure of $1,390,420 to construct two darns to reduce the estimated cost of the detention pond within Englewood by $316,154. However, the larger detention pond in Alternative No. 2 is "very tight" and barely adequate for that proposal while the smaller detention pond of Alternative No. 5 is a properly sized element of this Alternative. The additional dams offer additional p rotection to anyone downstream from them when flood flows exceed i n magnitude the anticipated 100-year event. Al terna ive No. 5 is similar to Alternativ s No. 2 and 3 in the 1 976 report in that they all still rely on a closed conduit with a fix d capacity to handle the peak runoff. Thus, wh n pe k sto rm r unoff comes down the channel which exceeds this design capacity, the runoff flow in excess of the design capac1ty of the closed c onduit must travel overland . The r1sk also xists that th clos d conduit may become plugged or partially plugg d which incre sea he flow ov rland. Properties within the x1s ing flood p lain wo uld be subject to damage under these c 1 rcurnstances. So~e hought should b given to th -4- • I . r lr I • • • The benefit-cost ratios must be supplemented by a set of environ- mental and social factors which are crucial to making the final de- cision. The following summarizes som~ of the advantages and dis- advantages related to Alternative No. 5. Alternative No. 5 -Flow Reduction through Detention Storage w i thi n Englewood and Four Dams Outside Englewood Advantages: 1. All the advantages listed for Alternative No. 2 in the 1976 report are applicable. 2. This solution becomes more multi-jurisdictional with the addi- tional proposed dams outside Englewood. Urban Drainage a n d Flood Control District, Greenwood, and Arapahoe County b ecome involved. 3. By changing diversion locations from near South Pearl Street to the east side of South Clarkson Street, the remaining p roper y north of the channel, west of Clarkson Street is removed f rom the flood plain. (This would be a new advantage for Al ternative No. 2 also.) 4. All the properties along Greenwood Gulch downstream from Pren ice and Berry Dams to Little Dry Creek would receive some level of flood protection. 5. The depth and area of the proposed detent i on pond at t~e high school athletic fields would be reduced. The average e timated depth of cut on school property would be approximately e ight feet. 6 . Anticipated design problems at the detent i on pond such as pump- i ng ground water should be eliminated. 1 . Ant i c i pate d p eak 1 00-year flood flows rea c h i ng Englewood would be r educed by t he a dd i t ion al stora ge o uts i de the Ci ty. Dis dvant ages: 1. All th disadvantages list d for Alt rnative No. 2 in h 1976 report ar applicable. 2. Acquisition of additional (presently und v lop d) prop sid h Ci y would be requir d for cons rue ion of ou - 3. The addi ion of Pren tic nd rry Dams adds $1 ,07 4 ,2 o h cos of h projec and r duces th b n fi /co s t ra tio for ngl ood from 6 .72 o 5.73 on h grass l~n d option. -s- • I • • • • Cos t Summary The summary of the cost estimates is as follows: Alternative No. 5 Grass-Lined Channel Concrete-Lined Channel Reach 1 Reach 2 Re ach 3 Re ach 4 Detention Pond Prentice and Berry Dams $802,957.00* -o- 2,117,06l.OO** 1,235.316.00 1,367,355.00 1,390,420.00 Total Estimated Project Cost $6,913,109.00 * Cost of reach if box is extended north ** Cost of reach if box is extended south *** Cost of reach if box is extended south Estima ted Annual Maintenance Expense Benefit-Cost Ratio $42,330.00 5.73 $802,957.00 -o- 2,046,913.00*** 1,017,775.00 1,367,355.00 1,390,420.00 $6,625,420.00 $1,277,651.0 0 1,978,728.0 0 2,019,358.0 0 $22,300.00 5.76 To recap the cost summaries of all the different alternatives under consideration, the following table reflects the estimated costs as r ported in the 1976 study or the supplement entitled Projec~ Cost Breakdowns, June 1977, which modified and updated estimates in the 1976 study. The dollars in the table are 1977 dollars. Grass-Lined Channel Alternative No. 1 • Alternative No. 2 $5,551,154.00 Alternative No. 3 6,582,278.00 Al tern tive No. 4 7,337,673 .00 Al rnative No. 5 6,913,109.00 cCal l-Ellingson Morrill ** Concrete-Lined Channel • $5,838,843.00 6,661,949.00 7,149,11 8.00 6,625,4 20.00 6,63 4,980.00 :ot a viable alternativ for comp rison because it refl c d "do~noth i ng" approach. ** Jo an op ion. • I . .,,: • -• .. LITTLE DRY CREEl< t-L AN CITY 0 ~ ENGLEWO?O ALTERNATIV E ~~5 FLOW REDUCTION TH ROUGH DETENTION STORAGE AND FOUR Df..I ,~S -· I · . I ' • - 0 .. LITTLE DRY CREEK , <..AN - - \ ' ' ~ .. • .. P R 0 C L A M A T I 0 N WHEREAS, The annual sale of Buddy Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars has been officially recognized and endorsed by governmental leaders since 1922 ; and WHEREAS , V.F.W. Buddy Poppies are assembled by disabled vetera ns, and the proceeds of this worthy fund-raising campaign are used exclusively for the benefit of disabled and n e edy veterans and the widows and o rpha ns of deceased vetera ns; and WHEREAS, The basic purpose of the annual sale of Buddy Poppies by the Veterans of Foreign Wars is eloquently reflected in the desire to "Honor the Dead by Helping the Living ". NOW, THEREFORE, I , EUGENE L. OTIS, Mayor of the City of Englewood , Colorado, hereby proclaim April 29, 3U and May 1, 1983 BUDD~ POPP~ DA~S in the City of Englewood, and I urge the citizens of this community to recognize the merits of this cause by contributing generously to its support through the purchase of Buddy Popp i es on the day set aside for the distribution of these symbols of appreciation for the sacrifices of our honored dead. I urge all patriotic citizens to wear a Buddy Poppy as mute evidence of our gratitude to the men of this country who have risked their lives in defense of the freedoms which we continue to enjoy as American citizens. GIVEN under my h nd and seal thi 18th day of April, 1983. - P ol 0 C L A M A 'l' 1 U WHEREAS, Colorad o has a long history of volunteerism , dating back to ou r pion ee r s who conquered rugged terrain and ho~tile environmen ts t o build new lives for themselves , their neighbo r s and their frontier communities; and WH ERE AS, from the frontier days to the present , Colo radans have exhibited independence , creati vity and innovati~n by working together to improve the quality of life in our majestic state ; and Wlii:;HJ.::AS , v olunteers , working in partnership w itll government , business and industry , fulfill many needs and perform nume r ous tasks that would otherwise r emain incomplete; and WHEREAS , dedicated volunteers in state programs for the mertally and physically handicapped , and for the elderly and the young , as well as those volunteers who serve on state and local boards and commissions, deserve to be recognized for their many hours of service ; OW , THEREFORE, I, EUGENE L . OTIS , Mayor of the City of E glewood , Colo r ado, do hereb y p r oclaim April 17 -23, 1983 as VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION W EK the City of Englewood and urge all citizens to join me in re og zing and thanking the thousands of volunteers who help r rpetu te Colorado 's pioneer spirit by donating portion of their t m , t e t and resources to the betterment and he lth of their commur ties through vo untary service . !VI:; ur.dcr my h nd rd se 1 this 18th d y of Apri , 1983. - P it U C L A M A '1' 1 U N WHEREAS, Colorado has a long history of volunte e rism, dating back to our pioneers wh o conquered ruyged terrain and houLlle environments to build new lives f o r themselves, their neighbo rs and their frontier comm unities; and WHEREAS, from the frontier days to the present, Coloradans have exhibited independence , creati vity and innovation by working together to improve the quality of life in our majestic state ; and Wt!l::Ht::AS , vo unteers, working in partner ship with yovl!rnml!nt , business and indust ry, fulfill many needs and perform n umer o us tasks that would otherwise remain incompl ete ; and WHEREAS, dedicated volunteers in state programs for the mer tally and physically handicapped , and for the elder y ard the youny , as well as those volunteers who serve on state and ocal boards and com missions, deserve to be recognized for their many hou r s of se rv ice ; 0 , THEREFORE, I, EUGE E L . OTIS , Mayor of the City of ~rg ewood, Colorado, do hereby proclaim April 17 -23, lYBJ as VOL0 Tl::ER HEC G ITION WEI::K C ty of Englewood and urge all citizens to join me in z rg and th nklng the thousands of volu tears who help t.: Co or do 's p oneer spirit by donating portion of the r : rt ard r sou rces to the bett rm nt nd he lth o f their s through volu tary serv ce . th 18th d y o£ April, ID. t;u v u .. • t yor D I S '! 1, --. _ ~.--_ .. :- COUNTY OF .;R.,~p ;,HOE STATE o;· ._:.:,:_~;_·)') • • • C.1.> .. : .. SUPPL EMENT~L RULING 7 . ' --0 ~ PEOPLE OF 7HE STATE OF COLORADO, BY AND ON BEHALF OF -:E CITY OF E N GLE~.JOOD, Plaintiff-Appc llrr.c. VS . FRANK MCLAUGHLIN, Defendant-Appellee . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS !·lATTER came on for consideration of the motion of the defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal of plaint~ff-appellant for failure to comply with Rule 237 (b), C.?-LC.R . The Court has considered said motion and, being fully advise d in the pre~ise s , now enters the following : SUPPLEl'fENTAL RULING The mo tion of de f endant-appellee to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff-appell'ant is denied. DONE this . iht day of April , 1983 nunc pro tunc ~1a rch 29, 1983. BY THE COURT : 'j ' ... I • - in s ·.·k ~ .... '-~-.. :- c o uNTY OF AR.:,P /'..!iOE STATE o; ~:::_::._· ~() • • • C .t s~..· ::n . SU PP LEMEN TAL RULI NG PEOPLE OF TH E STATE OF COLORADO , BY AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EN GL EH OOD, vs. FRANK MCLAUGHLIN, Pl a in tif f-Appc ll11~::. Defendant-Appe llee . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS ~~TTER came on for consideration of the motion of the defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal of plaint ~f f -appellant for failure to comply with Rule 237 (b), C.M.C.R . The Court has considered said motion and, being fully adv i s ed i n t he p re ~i ses , now enters the following : SUPPL~~NTAL RULING The motion of defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal of p l ain tif f-appell'ant is denied . DONE this , lh( day of April , 1983 nunc pro tunc Ma r ch 29, 1983. BY THE COURT : • I • • - • Drs ·~·~,~ .... ~.., ..... _·:·.: COUNTY OF AR..~PAHOE STATE Oi" c.:;:_::.;_· 90 • • • SUPPLEMENTAL RULING PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, BY AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, vs . FRANK MCLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff-Appc llll !t . Defendant-Appellee . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS HATTER came on for consideration of the ~:~otion of the defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal of plaint~ff-appellant for failure to comply with Rule 237 (b), C.~1.C .R. The Court has considered said motion and, being fully advised in the premises, now enters the following : SUPPLDIENTAL RULING The motion of defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff-appell'ant is denied. DONE this . lht day of April, 1983 nunc pro tunc March 29 , 1983 . BY THE COURT : • I • ( Dr s·nc .. ~.... ~.,., .... _·:.: COUNTY OF AR..:..P AHOE STATE 0! CO ~C. ?_·,.')0 • • • SUPPLEMENTAL RULING PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, BY AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ENGLWOOD, vs. FRANK MCLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff-Appc ll ~r.t, Defendant-Appellee . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS ~TTER came on for consideration of the motion of the defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff-appellant for failure to comply with Rule 237 (b), C.H.C.R. The Court has considered said motion and, being fully advised in the pre~ises, now enters the following : SUPPL~~NTAL RULING The motion of defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff-appellant is deni d. DONE thia , Jrt day of April, 1983 nunc pro tunc Harch 29 , 1983 . BY THE COURT : I . • • • ors··,d ... ~.. .. _· .. :- couNTY OF AR.~Pr\HOE S~AT E o;· ._: ... :_:;_-)') c .{sc: ::,·,. SUPPLEMENTAL RULI NG PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, BY AND ON BEHALF OF TlE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, vs. FRANK MCLAUGHLIN, . ' ' c __ , --· Plaintiff-App c lln ~::. Defendant-Appellee . ---------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS ~~TT ER came on for consideration of the motion of the defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal of plaint ~ff-appellant for failure to comply with Rule 237 (b), C .l-i .C .R. The Court has considered said motion and, being fully advised in the premise s , now enters the following : SUPPLEHENTAL RULING The motion of defendant-appellee to dismiss the appeal of plaintiff-appell'ant is denied . DONE this Jht day of April , 1983 nunc pro tunc .!arch 29, 1983. BY THE COURT : • I . • • • • /.~ .. ~\ .. , •• t J .J+l ,, Sunblrd llu•lner ..,_ · . , 1'. 0 . Uux MV53 '" • Uenttr, (.'0 IIUJU I \' ' " .: ( I . . • -• • • MEMO TO: Hayer Otis and l-1embers of City Council DATE: April 15, 1983 RE: Obscenity Matters For your information, I am enclosing a copy of a card I received concerning our success in District Court. I continue to receive requests concerning our litigation. Montrose, Wheat Ridge, Sheridan and the Municipal League have requested our legislation and inquired as to our legal approach on this issue. By the way, without exception, they are reluctan t to get involved in this tough issue. Respectfully, bb ~~.~ Ric~w~tt, C~ty Attorney Enclos re • I .