The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1982-05-03 (Regular) Meeting Agenda• • - :.: City Council Meeting -Regular _ May 3, 1982 0 - • CITY COUNCIL MEETING May 3, 1982 • • - RESOLUTION# 21, 23, 24, 25, 26 ORDI ANCE I U": ..2'J, J,Y, 2.S, 26 0 0 • I . . • • --, 7:30 P.M. 2 . 3 . • • • AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL fe_, MAY 3, 1982 _3µ¥u. 10W / Call to order, invocation by Reverend Mike Jackson, Englewood Free Metho d ist Church, 4395 South Lincoln Street, pledge of allegiance by Boy Scout Troop #92 , and roll call. \ cJ tL.J Minutes. Minutes of the regular meeting of April 5, 1982. (Copies enclosed.) Minutes of the regular meeting of April 19, 1982. (Copies enclosed .) Pre-Scheduled Visitors. (Please limit your presen- tation to 10 minutes.) (a) Mrs . Marie Kincaid, representing the Englewood V.F.W . Post 322 Auxiliary, will be present to present the City of Englewood a new American flag for the Police/Fire Center. (b) Mr. Robert A. Burco, Director of Center for the Improvement of Public Management, University of Colorado at Denver, will be present to addres s Council concerning a Council Members/Mayor Training Conference, May 20-22, 1982. (Copies enclosed.) Other Visitors . (Plea,te ,~imit your pres ,n~tion to 5 minutes . ) J3 ',, -1. 1lJ/l7.'--• , .3 S 5 ~/ tl.li!tl , 4. Public Hearing. Co111Dunications -No Action Reco111111ended . (a) Minutes of the Board of Adjusoaent and Appea ls meting of March 10, 1982 . (Copies enclosed .) (b) Minutes of the Urban~ n val Authority meeting of March 10, 1982 . (Copi s enclosed .) • ) I • • • • • - Page 2 May 3, 1982 Agenda -~ 5. Coumunications -No Action Recoumended (Continued). (c) Minutes of the Denver Regional Council of Govern- ments meeting of March 17, 1982 . (Copies enclosed .) (d) Minutes of the Board of Career Service Commission- ers meeting of March 18, 1982. (Copies enclosed .) (e) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of April 6, 1982. (Copies enclosed.) (f) Minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of April 13, 1982. (Copies enclosed.) (g) Minutes of the Public Library Board meeting of April 13, 1982 . (Copies enclosed.) (h) Municipal Court Activity Report for the month of March , 1982 . (Copies enclosed .) 6 . Coumunications -Ac tion Recoumended . (a) ·~ (b) Council Coumunica tion from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of April 20, 1982 con - cerning the finding of fact for an amendment of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 22 .4-10 and 22 .4-11 . (Cop i es enclosed .) {LLL ~lcu.J Counc i l Coumun i cation from the Water and Sewer Board concerning t he cleani ng and cement lining o f t he exi s t ing wa t er main on South Broadwa y. (Copies e n closed.) (1L .._~t (c) Recommendation from the Parks a nd Recrea tion Coumission meeting of April 13, 198 2 con c e rning repairs on Romans Park Restrooms. (Copies enclosed .) 7. City Attorney. Ordinances on Final Reading . (a) Ordinance creating Paving District No. 28 in the City of Englewood, Colorado, or dering the con- struction and installation of street paving, curb and gutter nd sidewalk im provemen ts togeth r with necessary incidentals, on certain atr eta nd av nues; providing for the issuanc on bonds in paym nt for s id improvements; and • tting forth oth rd tails in connection with the District. (Copies nclos d.) • I • • • • - Page 3 May 3 , 1982 Agenda 7. City Attorney (Continued). (d) Ordinance prohibiting meter customers from re - verting to flat rate accounts. (Copies enclosed .) Ordinance approving a contract between the City of Englewood, Colorado, and the Denver Regional Council of Governments for the provision of services by the City in the execution of the Denver Regional Urban Runoff Program and for reimbursement by the Council of Governments to the City of eligible project costs not exceeding $10,000. (Copies enclosed.) Ordinance approving an Agreement with various cities of the County of Arapahoe and Browne, Bortz, and Coddington relating to Denver/Arapahoe County's Fiscal Flow Study. (Copies enclosed.) .Bills for Ordinances . c&11.~i ,t> &t ~l,'-l Bill approving a contract for municipal services to permit other governmental entities to use the Englewood Animal Shelter. (Copies enclosed.) (f) Bill amending the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance c_{fiJ 'i'.).. of the City of Englewood, to permit motor vehicle 1 '.l. • 1;i; _'\· ~ repair use and a conditional use in the B-2 Zone ~ u-f',0'1 ._.3D~ District . (Copies enclosed .) Other Matters . _µatWif'L {t t6 (g) Oddfellows vs. City of Englewood. (Copies enclosed.) (h) Sewer easement between West Vassar Avenue and West Hillside Avenue . (Copies enclosed.) .y, 1 lu c.. JI (It; 8 . (i) Attorney's Choice . -~ti,.-.< '>U:f-l·' ll' L /!nal.U1..., ,,a..z,tuj_ -~~ _t.iJ(<t_,U:.I'""' -4 (,jlr['::, a'lo ~,.,'\.u...._,/l '-.ltl.<... -·-/!,~~'+ m i~ cL <Y I c. < .-, ,., , ~ -rr.,'L, City Man\ger . .-IY) 'f t. cl '1'1-t -tu ,llt "'-J- • (a) Council Communication from the City Manager concerning Aid To 0th r Ag ncies -1982. (Copies enclos d .) (b) Council Coamunic tion from th City Manager concerning th Six-Quart r Budg t from the period April, 1982 through S pt mb ~. 1983 . (Copi a ncloaed .) • I • • - • • • • • Page 4 May 3, 1982 Agenda 8. City Manager (Continued). (d) (),~ 0 (e) ~ tf.... . -~ .• (f) ~ (g) Council ColllllUllication from the Department of Engineering Services concerning an award of contract for demolition of structures and site preparation at 3449 South Broadway and 126-130 East Girard Avenue. (Copies enclosed.) Council ColllllUllication from the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Assistant Director of Finance concerning Spencer Ballfield lighting . (Copies enclosed .) Council COIIIIIUllication from the Downtown Manage- ment Conmittee concerning the contract with Design Workshop, Inc. (Copies enclosed.) Transmittal of the 1981 Annual Financial Report. (Copies enclosed .) Manager's Choice. 9. General Discussion . (a) Mayor's Choice. (b) Council Member's 10 . Adjournment. l11U1~ ~gMC COWN City Manager AM/sb (./J UI )1.., ) I • • 1.n ..... , _n - • • • • Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent H1adav Neal Fltzoatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis ~L i:o .; t {fl~ ~ t ~~V -J~1i11 1..tU.~ j~ .( t( J,(J (S £0 LU!.., o J'J ., ,,,,J-}he ( 11.I ''-- / j n 7r 11 ' / 7 d,,, ra.l • Abstain I . • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1qdav - Neal l,.,- Fl tzoatrick I,-- Weist ,___ Bi lo t,-- Bradshaw t-- Otis L.-- I • • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded ....-:7 Nay Absent Ab s tai n ' ~ HI g<Jay -v Neal / Fl tzoat rick I/ Wei s t /I (/ Bi lo L L ..,.. Bradshaw '/ Otis CJ - /a_ ·~· • I • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain -, lffntlav \ Nea·l \ Fl tznatrick I Weist / V"' Bi lo I t..--Bradshaw I Otis \ \.. I • • • • n • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain -Hlciday ~ Neal Fl tzoatrick Weist I Bi lo I Bradshaw I Otis - I • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hioday I Neal 7 Fltzoatrick - Weist I V Bi lo I ....---Bradshaw I Otis I lb • I • • • • • - • ,. • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain HTodav Neal Fl tzoat rick Weist Ailo Bradshaw Otis I . • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Na y Absent Abstain Hl<1dav Neal Fl tzoatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis I • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Mov ed Secon ded n Ayes Na y Ab s e t Ab stain 111adav Neal F l tzoatrick Wei s t Ri lo Bradshaw Otis J CLliUu /2t~C-<V ,.3 , ~ Cj/ti,u,-,, J.;JSS 0 /kuurav .., (! t0'Let 1-Yu:.d.., (A..b-t-il l 4rJvc. VL4-ri , -,,( .A.-.l.2.ul rJt t'i ~4 Cl~ 01 _ I . • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Aye s Nay Absent Abstain , H1ooay \ V Neal \ Fitzoatrick I Weist I ~ Bi lo I Bradshaw I Otis I ' Y). ~- 0 • I • • • • - • • Abstain Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent \ HlgClay 1 Neal 1 ......... Fi tzoatrick I Wei st I Bi lo I V Bradshaw I Oti s \ " • I • • • • - • • yes a y Absent Ab sta in Hlo<1av ' Neal I ~ Fitzoatrick I Wei s t I Bi lo I V Bradshaw I Oti s \ b b (j_,,/JL0 r C:hA-~ r L[,y,,,._,_.,__,e f {Z,yne,,v m /6 -3, t a ~. 5-0 • I . • • - • • c rn ~t_µL' ~d-ROLL CALL U6 -~l/j Hoved Seconded Ayes Na y Absen t Abstain ' H1 qday Neal I ,__ Fitzoatrick I Wei s t I Bi lo I ,,.. Bradshaw I Oti s \ ' 6c b, 700 0 I . . • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1qday Neal Fltzoatrick Weist ,,_. Bi lo V Bradshaw Otis V • I . • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Ricidav Neal 1.,-' Fitzoatrick Weist -Bi lo Bradshaw Otis 0. )') ) --I )c.V el C,.,< --/ ) 0 ~ '; I :f I ._., I , ) v " J ~ t' - /1( ( I ;f /; /. . ' ,, J , ,11 J I I ..... 1 ~ I ~/ 0 l -) • .I I I I {_ I 'J I / I • • • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1gday Neal Fltzoatrick Weist Ri lo Bradshaw Otis -,( J no_ J - / > l ~ ;I • /. ,:1, - -, \_,'1 f ;p -'(~ P.., 0 • I • • • • I • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Ab s tain HI ,may Neal v Fltzoatrick Wei s t Bi lo Bradshaw Otis ) / 1 -_2";.-"JJ --·-::t~::::i1~·=zi1:;_;:--/ 'ro ., ---1 I V I • ,) /: "<.)I ( l / . 0 I ,~ /I -4.I" , ' 1 • I • • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Ab s tain Hladav -Neal - J/' Fl tzoat rick - Weist ---Bi lo -Bradshaw - Otis (_ . 0 • I • • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain ...... H1qday Neal Fltzoatrlck Weist Bi lo _.. Bradshaw Otis C. J - --h ., ~) 0 • I • • • • • - • • ROL L CALL Mov ed Seco n ded Ayes Na y Absent Ab s tain Hiqdav Neal Fltznatrick -Wei st Bi lo Bradshaw Otis (? ( >l -( ( I _,,11 ) _..... C u r v,_ I _., I u. --..._., ~1 0 .._, -- 7. .. ? ? I 1 .....; I '-.J ...., l. I' .. , ~I , ti L I ) \ - 0 ( ( .../ /i ) L I' \ I C"'-; ,.. ) t ... (., /' ) t / t A ...___.,, ,, ( t "--' \. (,J I..,....,, )"; II J ~ .. / ) . 0 ,; , ' ' . I' / ) ; I t -I I { J.. t'' I , (1 \ ~ / I ..... ' I , I / ( ) t..( , .. ,{ I'. I • I • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain Hlqday Neal Fltzoatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis tf . ' i '; . l;J I k .;1?~) /I ' ,, ... (' ,'\ 4.,.; / IC u•/,,./, /; 0. /c ( t1 f u. /(),4-"{/ . / t1 ( ;J J.1 -f- C)/'*I ' ,. 0-I ') I ,) J' • ,I V I ._,(; ~ I' f.., I ( . I ' ~ '-,J t' { t .. '-c;, ' ) 1 , 'r./ \ • I • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1odav Neal - Fitzoatrick -Wei st Bi lo -Bradshaw Otis - 0 ") t • I • • • • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1qaav Neal Fitzoatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis ' ) , , t ' ; ,/' ' I --, ._ ,{ ( I I /)A I oJ ' ~ ( I J .. .... I 1 , I?, ,.. () 0 .. ... /,1/, I I ( -..) , ) I I w , ~1 I ,, ;r'A /) (, I , ,, ( /-,, ,_ I ,, '~ ' ;I 1 I ... ~ ' , { (.,I. I > ", . 1 { ') u.-C, I • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain -H1gday ~ Neal - Fitzoatrick - Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis - -/ } ' ..) ./) • I • • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seco n ded Aye s Nay Absent Ab sta i n H1 gda y -Neal -Fltzoatrick -Weist -Bi lo -Bradshaw -Otis - I ( t;.} /t."' (>'. V , c.. t " "I u t' ,, )" r t I ..J / "/. d ; 'l,.. ~ I ,,., ("t C / 1 _/ .I ) lt. " .I r/ # L ) I {.( i • • I • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain --Hiodav -Neal -Fl tzoatrick \ Weist I --Bi lo / Bradshaw 7 Otis \ '\. '_) .' ;)~ • I • • • • - Moved Seconded .... _.. • • ROLL CALL H1 qda y Neal Fl tzoatr i ck Wei st Bi lo Bradshaw Oti s -;. .:; 'Z. • • • Aye s Na y Ab sent Absta in \ T ) I I \ \ I • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Se con de d Ay.i:s Na y Ab s e nt Abstain ' H1QC1av 1 v-Neal I Fl tzoatrick I Wei s t I -Bi lo I Bradshaw I Oti s I " 0 z. - • • I • • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded A yes Nay Absent Abstain ~1 adav Neal v-Fitzoatrick Weist v-Ri lo Bradshaw Otis • • I . • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1qday \ Neal I F l tzoatrick 7 Wei st I Bi lo I Bradshaw Otis \ • I • • • • • - • • .: ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ay~ Nay Absent Abstain H1qday ' Neal I Fltzoatrick I Weist I -p Bi lo I v--Bradshaw I Otis \ \ • I • • • • - I ... I I • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded H1gday Neal Fi tzDatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis -1, ,~/YYL(ZXM_ 1/f .. -tw~ • • • • Ayes Nay Absent Abstain I • • • - • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Se co nded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain ..... H1adav \ Neal I v-Fitznatrick I Weist I ,_ Bi lo I Bradshaw l Otis ' tJ C ~:(, ;liJ--0.;/Y>U.,,J-T" d ~ .,,I)? ~ •-1 ~)_v *'- I • • • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Aye s N ay H1qday Neal Fl tzoat rick Weist Rj lo Bradshaw Otis ,,&?1-~ d. /Y)U-t~ ~1-L£ 'J,)U -1-,/ ..... /w'ii.J 1-.z a u~ <yJ /l. /1 { ')1 Absent Abstain ---~/},<-, c~uh -a_, .J,ai;?-t;Y) t..e ,77-,f ,!; IID S v.),_ a<"-, "' '--'--.. \44.u l ,d, d<<-<1 Z:,,i" -\tJ IL ,,,M .. (!""'"'-' d. ,x. VU• <'. . {, L -Ju. ~ I . • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain --NIQOav " Neal l ----Fitzoatrick I Weist I Bi lo I ,._..--Bradshaw I I Otis l \__ • I • • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain HiQClay Neal Fl tzoatrick Weist Ri lo Bradshaw Otis • I . • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Mov e d Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain ' H1qdav \ Neal I <--Fltzoatrick I Weist I Bi lo I Bradshaw ! Otis \. "- • I . . • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1qday Neal Fl tznatrick Wei st -Bi lo Bradshaw Otis ,Yhnt rfu/ V C~ 0 t,,, 'f""m ' '-,,YU '>" I'-""" ;(?,,,_,/, ft v)u,< ,,U-<-,/YJ, ~ )<l,UJH~ µ e,.,/..__ ~ /Yl U n < .,?-,' :(1:, U l.,J v tJ-( //)LR/~ /J?l 7 f ;,(J),i_ i V t ,d,,,;;; /JU.,;. ,,u,, ,.,_,,,.,v /0 ,(',,,.;_~;__, -( l'!Y) -r oA.~7 ' '! [ _1 ,, o/J cJ -/J a ci:Z.u}l aoru'--t,4 ,. ~ .,.~1-.,(.J • I . • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1qday \ ........ Neal I Fi tzoatrick I We ist I Bi lo I r J,,-Bradshaw I Otis \ "' /Y) Ld '( /l'-Z...., -~<--., J6 · ~ 1-0--L /_· 3D • I • • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1qday Neal Fl tZPat rick Weist Bl lo Bradshaw Otis • I . • • • - • • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain C._-1?J f fl-A-tu-I--c~ fl~1u,_, ~Lzjj-~ • I • • • - • • l'loved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain ,... - -\ I 111aday Neal .---,- ~ Fl tzoatrick --Weist -Bi lo -J/ Bradshaw I [_ I I Otis I / I I I =J lt1--.... • I . • • • • - • • t b. • • I • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Na y Ab s ent Ab s tain H1qday '\ £---° Neal \ Fltzoatr l c k I Weist I .....----Bi lo / Bradshaw / Otis I \ • I • • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain • I • • • - Moved v-- • ROLL CALL Seconded H1qday Neal V Fi tzoatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis Cpl,:-(_ /ti (f1 v:; ,') {) • • • Ayes Nay Absent \ Abstain \ 7 I 7 ( \ ' I • • • - • • . - ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1ndav \ Neal 7 I/ Fl tzoatrick I Wei st I Bi lo I 7 Bradshaw \ Otis \ "--a A:_-Y {lll ,Zl 1 d ~f/YL£ /),2ft • I . • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ay~ Nay Absent Abstain v rf1nday ' I 1.---Neal J Fi tznat rick I Weist I Ri lo J Bradshaw I Otis I \ - • I . • - • • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1adav Neal Fl tznatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis fa-4-//2 {) ,l),l_(_,L -<f J'??j f u,,,~ C/K.,L,2£.n~ J<'-b-, ~ ~~a£ !ft'~ 1 .,,;, L'« /,(, J ~· (. d._ S l7 · I J{ • I . • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain 111oaav Neal -Fltzoatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis ' • I . • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain H1qday Neal Fltzoatrick Weist Bi lo Bradshaw Otis .,{ / I . • • • • - • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Na y Absent Abstain H1<1dav ' Neal I Fitzoatrick I Wei st I Bi lo I v-Bradshaw I Otis \ "' • I • • • • • - • ,· • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain . H1qoay \ Neal I c.---Fltzoatrick 7 Weist I Bi lo I Bradshaw I Otis \ '-- • • I • • • Moved ,:)_ le , l ) <--l,J-A-{_J_ I, L{,£ /}.,[_ ,{, 1 --- Secon de d ROLL CAL L H1 o day Neal Fitzoatrick We i st Bi lo Brad s haw Oti s ~ --a ,l{ c:-l(_ ( ?'-V--- 'lt1 '1 -~ 'l'- ·c. ~ ,{ • • • Ayes Nay Abs e nt Abs t ain -l.""' I //J,,)L I . • • • • • COUNCIL CHAM BERS CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO April 5, 1982 r (y REGULAR MEETING : 'lbe City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, met in regular session on April 5, 1982, at 7 :30 p.m. to order, Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw, presiding, called the meeting 'lbe invocation was given ty Mr. Mac Bartee, Minister of Englewood Church of Christ, 4690 South Logan Street. 1be pledge of allegiance was led by Boy Scout Troops #115 and #154. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present : Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw, Absent : Council Members Weist, Otis. 'lbe Mayor Pro Tem declared a quorum present, * * * * * * Also present were: City Manager HcCown City Attorney DeWitt Assistant City Attorney Holland Director of Public Wo rks Waggoner Director of Engineering Services Diede Director of Utilities Fonda Assistant Director of Co1D1Dunity D v lopment-Planning Romans R venu Chi f/D puty City Clerk Johanniuon D puty City Clerk Watkins * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER BlLO MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 8, 19 82. Council M mber Fitzpatrick s cond d th motion. Upon a c 11 of th roll, the voter sult d follows: Ay I : Council H mbere Hi day, N al, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Brad eh w. • I • • -• • • Apr il S, 19 8 2 Page 2 Nays : None. Absent : Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion carried, * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO APPROVE THE MIN UTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 15, 1982. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote result ed as fol l ows: were: Ayes : Nays: Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist , Otis. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * There were no pre-scheduled visitors on the agenda. * * * * * * lll.ere were no other visitors at this time, * * * * * * "Communications -No Action Recommended" on the agenda (a) (b) (c) (d) Minutes of the Englewood Housing Authori ty special meting of September 16, 1981 and annual/regular meeting of F bruary 17, 1982. Minutes of th Board of Ad justment and Ap- peals meeting of February 10, 1982 . Minutes of the Denver R gional Council of Governments meeting of February 17, 19 8 2 . Minutes of th Board of Car er Service Commissioners meetings of February 18, 25, and March 4, 1982. I • • - • Apr il 5, 1 982 Page 3 (e) (f) (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (1) • • • Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meetings of February 23 and March 2, 1982. Minutes of the Public Library Advisory Board meeting of March 9, 1982. Minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of March 9, 1982. Minutes of the Downtown Development Auth o r ity meeting of March 10, 1982. Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Comm ission meeting of March 11, 1982. Municipal Court Activity Report for the mo nth o f February , 1982. Memorandum from the Director of Community De- velopment concerning her attendance at the Downtown Development meeting in Baltimore, Memorandum from Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw and Council Members Bilo and Weist to Mayor Otis and Members of Council concerning their at- tendance at the Co ngressional-City Conferen c e. COUNCIL MEMBERS FI TZPATRICK MOVED TO ACCEPT "COMMUNICA- TIONS -NO ACTI ON RE COMMENDED" AGENDA I TEMS S (A) -S (L). Coun cil Member Bilo seconded the mot i o n. Up on a ca l l o f t h e r ol l , the vote resulted as follows : Ayes : Nays : Abs nt : Council Memb ers Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw, None. Co unc i l Members W i t, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried. Council Memb r Neal inquired about the status in r g rd to th Board of Adjustment and Appeals changing thei r d u ties that relat to zoning and u e, City Attorn y D Witt stated am thod h a s b en s t ab lish d whereby ov r r~ n xt f w months the Zoning Or dinan ce wil l b r - x mind by his offic and the D p rtm nt of Co11111unlty Dev elopm nt to a e wh r amendm nts re n cess ry. * * • • * • I • • • April 5, 1982 Page 4 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO BRING FORWARD AGENDA ITEM 7E -A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE CREATING PAVING DISTRICT NO. 28. Coun- cil Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays : Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw, None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1982~- BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 21 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BILO AN ORDINANCE CREATING PAVING DISTRICT NO. 28 IN THE CITY OF ENGLE- WOOD, COLORADO, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF STREET PAVING, CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS TOGETHER WITH NECESSARY INCIDENTALS, ON CERTAIN STREETS AND AVENUES; PRO- VIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS IN PAYMENT FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS; AND SETTING FORTH OTHER DETAILS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DISTRICT. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 21, SERIES OF 1982, ON FIRST READING. Council Member Fitzpatrick sec-onded th motion. Council Member Higday stated as a result of the objec- tions raised at th public haring he concurred with the resi- dents tha the 3700 nd 3800 blocks of South Lincoln approached ad d-nd s reet wi h littl r ffic. Further, th street was not in bad conditions even though it was not up to City standards. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION AND DE- LETE SOUTH LINCOLN, THE 3700 AND 3800 BLOCKS, FROM KENYON AVEN UE TO MANSFIELD AVENUE. Council M mber Fitzpatrick seconded the motion. Mayor Pro Tm Bradsh w ntered into the record am mo- randum from Council M mber W 1st cone rning Paving District No. 28. Ms. Bradshaw poin d out Mr.Wis flt the 3700 and 3800 block of South Lincoln should b d l d from th paving district, I • • - April 5, 1982 Page 5 • • • Upon a call of the roll, the vote on the amendment resulted as follows : Ayes: Nays : Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal. Council Members Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw, Council Members Weist, Otis, Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion defeated, Council Member Fitzpatrick asked consideration for the City absorbing costs which are the regular administrative costs of the district. Mr, Fitzpatrick stated it would amount to ap- proximately 10% additional for the City, Council Member Neal noted the objection raised at the hearing on Radcliff and Chenango in that the residents understood when they came into the City on annexation in 1962, the City would ~rovide maintenance for streets. Mr. Neal stated the Street De- partment did write back to the residents at that time confirming upkeep and maintenance of streets. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION AND DE- LETE WEST RADCLIFF AND WEST CHENANGO FROM THE DISTRICT. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion, Director of Engineering Services Gary Diede asked for direction on whether or not the motion included taking out the streets for concret removal as well . Council Member Neal withdrew his motion. Council Mem- ber Bilo withdrew his second to the motion. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION AND TAKE WEST RADCLIFF AND WEST CHENANGO FROM SECTION BAND MOVE TO SECTION C REMOVING THEM FROM THE OVERLAY DISTRICT AND LEAVE IN THE CURB, GU TTER AND CONCRETE SECTION. Council Member Bilo aecond d the mo tion. Upon call of the roll, the vote on th amendment r -sulted as follows : Ayes : Nays : Abs nt : Council Members Higd y, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bi lo, Bradshaw. Non . Council Memb ra W 1st, Otis. M yor Pro Tm Br dshaw d clar d th motion carrl d. • I • • 0 April 5, 1982 Page 6 • • • Council Member Neal noted at the public hearing people objected to the widening of Logan on the basis that it was of no benefit to the property owner. Mr. Neal stated what needed to be accomplished on Logan can be done by eliminating parking on one side. Mr. Neal stated the residents would rather see the character of the street maintained. In response to Council Member Bilo's question, Mr. Diede stated Logan is designated as an arterial street throughout Engle- wood. In order to provide safe parking for the speed of traffic on aterial streets, the City's standard is to provide a 44' width which allows parking on both sides and a travel lane in each direction , which is being proposed for Logan. In response to Council Member Neal's question, Mr. Diede stated if parking was removed from one side, then the existing street width would be safe. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw's question regard- ing the crown problem on Logan, Mr. Diede stated the street did not have to be widened to reduce the crown. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION TO AMEND SAID MAP PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS TO MAINTAIN THE EXISTING STREET WIDTH FOR SOUTH LOGAN FROM CORNELL TO DARTMOUTH AVENUE. Council Member Fitzpatrick seconded the motion. Council Member Bilo spoke in favor of widening South Logan to keep the design of intent for the rest of the street. Upon a c 11 of the roll, the vot resulted as follows : Ayes : Nays : Absent : Council Members Neal, Fitzpatrick. Council Members Higday, Bilo, Bradshaw. Council Member W i t, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Br dsh w d clar d th motion d feat d. COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO CHANGE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PAVING DISTRICT FROM APRIL 19, TO APRIL 26, 1982. Council M mb r Bilo cond d th motion. Upon a call of th roll, th vot r sulted follows : Ay s: Nays : Council Memb rs Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. Non. • I • • - April 5, 1982 Page 7 Absent: • • • Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared a recess at 8 :15 p.m. Council reconvened at 8 :28 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present : Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. Absent : Council Member Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared a quorum present. * * * * * * Council Member Neal asked Director Diede to explain what the research showed regarding the agreements that were made when Chenango and Grand were annexed to the City compared to the claims made the public hearing as it pertained to the City treat- ing the streets as if they had already been in a paving district. Director Diede stated the City did agree at the time of annexation to maintain the streets for Chenango and Grand at no cost to the property owner. Director Diede stated he could not find the same information for Radcliff and Stanford ; however, they were annexed round the same time and the streets are similar in type of con truction. Council M mber Neal noted it was possible the same terms wer e greed upon for all four streets. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION AND TAKE STANFORD AND GRAND FROM SECTIO N BAND MOVE TO SECTION C FOR CURB AND GUTTER WORK. Council M mb er Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of th roll, the vote resulted s follows: Aye Nays : Abs nt : Council Members Higday, N al, Fitzpatrick, Bilo. Br dsh w. Non • Council M mb rs Wist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tm Br deh w d clar d the motion carri d. I • • - • April 5 , 1982 Page 7 Absent : • • • Council Members Weist , Otis. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared a recess at 8 :15 p.m. Council reconvened at 8 :28 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw ask ed for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were pres e n t: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bi l o, Bradshaw. Absent : Council Member Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared a quorum present. * * * * * * Council Member Neal asked Director Diede to explain what the research showed regarding the agreements that were made when Chenango and Grand were annexed to the City compared to the claims made the public hearing as it pertained to the City treat- ing the streets as if they had already been in a paving district. Dire c t o r Died e s t ated the Ci ty did agree at the time o f annexat ion t o ma inta in t h e streets for Chenango and Grand at no c ost to the pro perty owner. Director Diede stated he could not f ind the sam e info rm ation f or Radcliff and Stanford ; however, th e y we r e a nn e x ed around the sam e t im e and the streets are similar in type of construction . Council Member Neal noted it wa s possible the s ame terms were agreed upon for all four streets . COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION AND TAKE STANFORD AND GRAND FROM SECTION BAND MOVE TO SECTION C FOR CURB AND GUTTER WORK. Council M mber Bilo s conded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, th vot resulted as follows : Ayes : Nays : Absent: Council Members Higday, eal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw . None. Council Members W ist, Otis . Mayor Pro Tm Bradsh w d clar d th motion carried • • I • - • April 5, 1982 Page 9 Absent: • • • Council Members Weist , Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried, Council set a study session on April 12, 1982, at 5: 00 p .m . to discuss paving districts. Council Members Neal and Fitzpatrick noted they would not be able to attend the study session. City Manager Mccown stated he would notify Council Mem ber Weist and Mayor Otis. * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO BRING FORWARD AGENDA ITEM SB -COUNCIL COMMUNICATION CONCERNING CITY BANKING SERVICES. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays : Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried. Eric Johannisson, Revenue Chief /Deputy City Clerk, ap- peared before Council and discussed bids for banking services. Mr. Johannisson recommended a warding banking services to First Inter- state Bank based upon the bid response analysis. COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO APPROVE AND ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR BANKING SERVICES WITH FIRST INTERSTATE BANK. Council Member Bilo seconded th motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vot r sulted as follows: Ay s : Nays : Abs nt : Council H mbers Hlgd y, N al, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Brad sh w. None. Council M mb rs Wist, Otis, Mayor Pro Tm Bradshaw d cl rd th 110tlon carri d. * * * * * * Dir ctor of Utilltl I Stu Fond diecue, d a Council Co unic tlon from th Wt r nd S wer ard cone rnin th • I • • In April 5, 1982 Page 10 • • • bo r ing and relining of a water main along South Broadway t o en- h an ce the transmission of water and help alleviate s ome o f the r ust problems. Mr. Fonda introduced Mike Florry of Camp , Dr esser and McKee, who explained the pro j ect in detail. Mr. Florry stated the project should be done before the water season. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO COMMENCE ADVERTISEMEN T FOR RECEl VING BIDS FOR THE PROJECT OF RELINING A 12" MAIN ON SO UTH BROADWAY BETWEEN BELLEVIEW AND QUINCY. Council Member Fitzpa tri c seconded the motion. Council Member Bilo opposed the motion. Mr. Bilo stated he was against the timeframe of having to do the pro- ject so rushed and was against crisis legislation. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw stated she shared some of Coun- cil Member Bilo's comments ; however, she felt the project was necessary. Council Member Neal pointed out the motion was to so- licit bids not make the actual award. Upon a c all o f the roll, the vot e resulted as follows : Ayes : Nays : Absent : Counc i l Members Higday , Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bradshaw. Counc il Memb e r Bilo. Council Members Weist, Oti s. Ma yor Pro Tem Br ad shaw declared the mot ion c arr ied. * * * * * * Director Fonda pres nted a Council Communication from Southg te Sanitatio n Distr ic t r qu e st i ng nnex tion to th e ser- vic ar und r S u p pl ment 193. COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO APPROVE SUPPLEMENT #93 TO THE SOUTHGATE SANITATION DISTRICT. Coun cil M mber Bilo seconded the motion. Upon c 11 of the roll, the vote re ulted as follows : Ay a : Nays : Abs n Council M mb rs Higday, Neal , F i t z patrick, Bilo, Bradah w. None. Co un cil M b rs iat, Ot i • • I • • April 5, 1982 Page 11 • • • Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * Director Fonda presented a Council Communication from the Water and Sewer Board concerning a reversion from meter to flat rate billing status. The Board is recommending that custom ers be prohibited to revert from meter to flat rate status. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTOR NEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CITY CODE WHICH WOULD PROHIB IT REVERSION FROM A METERED ACCOUNT TO FLAT RATE STATUS. Council Mem- ber Bilo seconded the motion. Council Member Neal stated he opposed the motion not because he was in favor of reversion or allowing people to revert, he just did not think it should be in the form of an ordinance. Council Member Fitzpatrick stated analysis has shown people are wasteful under the flat rate. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes: Nays: Absent : Council Members Higday, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw, Council Member Neal. Council Members Weist , Otis. May or Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * Director Fonda presented a Council Communication from the Water nd S wer Board nd The Writer Corporation cone rning fencing McLellan Re ervoir. COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVE D TO AUTHORIZ E THE WATER AND SEWER DEPARTMENT TO PROCEED BUILDING A FENCE IN AC CO RDAN CE WITH THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT CONTAINED IN MR. RIECHERT'S LETTER OF MARCH 3, 1982 AND THAT BIDS FOR THE WORK BE OBTAINED FOR SUB- MITTAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Council Memb r Higday second d the motion. Upon a c 11 of th roll, th vot resulted as follow : Ay s : Nye : Council M rob r Higday, Neal, Fitzpatri ck, Silo, Br d haw. Non. I • • n April 5 , 1982 Page 12 Abse nt : • • • Council Me mber s Wei st , Otis. Mayor Pr o Tern Br ad s h aw dec lared the mot ion c arr ied . * * * * * * Dire c t o r Fond a presente d a Council Communication from the Water and Sewer Board concerning a c ontract between the City of Englewood and the Denver Regional Council of Governments re - lating to the McLellan study. Mr. Fonda stated the study would be a par t of the Clean Lakes program. The City would have Bl ack & Veatch expand their present study and would be reimbursed in accordance with the contract. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORN EY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE ENTERING INTO THE CONTRACT. Council Mem- ber Fitzpatrick seconded the mot ion. URon a cal l o f the r oll , the vote resulted as follows : Ayes : Nays : Absent : Council Members Hi gday , Neal , Fitzpatrick , Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist , Otis. Ma yor P ro Tero Bradshaw d ec lare d th e mot ion c a rried . * * * * * * Assistant Director of Community Development -Planning, Dorothy Romans, presented a Council Commu nication from t h e Plan- ning and Zoning Commission concerning an amendment to the Compre- hensive Zoning Ordinance by adding Section 22.411h Conditional Use, motor vehicle repair and car wash businesses in B-2 . Ms. Romans stated the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the amendment t which no one w s present. Ms. Romans stated the Planning and Zoning Commi sion r quests that Council consider the amendment and hold a public haring. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE ON AN AMENDMENT TO THE CO MPREHE NSIVE ZON- ING ORDINANCE IN RELATION TO B-2 ZONE DISTRICT AND I NCO RP ORA TING THE RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH BY THE CITY PLANN I NG AN D ZON I NG COMMISSIO N. Council M mber Fitzpatrick s conded the motion . Upon a call of th roll, the vot r sult d as follows: Ay s : Council Member Higday, Neal, Fitzp trick, Bilo, Br dshaw. • I • • n - • April 5, 1982 Page 13 Nays: Absent : • • • None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from Munici - pal Court Judge Parkinson recommending the appointment of Geraldine Allan as an Associate Municipal Judge for the City. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDA - TION OF APPOINTMENT. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Council asked the City Manager to send a memorandum to the Municipal Judge requesting a procedure by which the addi- tion and deletion of associate judges are recorded. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION AND AP- POINT GERALDINE ALLAN AS AN ASSOCIATE JUDGE. Council Member Higday seconded the mot ion . Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays : Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weis , Otis. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion carried. Upon a call of the roll, the vote on the original mo- tion resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays : Absent : Council Memb rs Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradsh w. None. Council Memb rs Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw d cl red the motion carried. * * * * * * ORDINANCE NO. 18 SERIES OF 1982 BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 16 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BILO • I • • - • April 5, 1982 Page 14 • • • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING 13-4-lS(a) (6) OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE OF 1969 PERTAINING TO EXEMPTION UNDER THE CITY USE TAX. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 16, SERIES OF 1982, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Fitzpatrick sec- onded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays: Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * ORDINANCE NO. 19 SERIES OF 1982 BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 18 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE LEASE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD REAL PROPERTY TO THE MULTI-JURISDI CTIO NAL FIRE ARMS SCHOOL. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 18, SERIES OF 1982, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays : Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. Non. Counc l M mbers Wist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Br dsh w d clared the motion carri d. * * * * * * ORDINANCE NO. 20 SERIES OF 1982 BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 17 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY • I • • - April 5, 1982 Page 15 • • • AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A LICENSE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE OF COLORADO LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING ACADEMY AND THE CITY OF ENGLE- WOOD, COLORADO, FOR USE OF THEIR FIRING RANGE FACILITIES AND AU- THORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 17, SERIES OF 1982, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Fitzpatrick seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 21 SERIES OF 1982 * * * * * * BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 19 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BILO AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO, GRANTING CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AN EASEMENT TO USE SCHOOL PROPERTY FOR A STORM WATER DETENTION AREA AND ESTABLISHING OTHER RELATED TERMS AND CONDITIO NS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 15, SERIES OF 1982. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 19, SERIES OF 1982, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Fitzpatrick seconded th motion. Upon a c 11 of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes : Counci l M mbers Higd y, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo . N ys : None. Absent : Council M rob r Wei . 0 i . Abat in: Council M rob r Bradshaw. Mayor Pro Tm Br d haw d cl rd th motion c rried, * * * * * * I • • - • April 5, 1982 Page 16 ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1982~- BY AU THORITY A BILL FOR • • • COUNC I L BILL NO. 22 INTRODUCED BY CO UN CI L MEMBER NEAL AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIV E ZONING ORDINAN CE OF TH E CITY OF ENGLEWOOD BY REPEALING AND RE -ENACTING SECTION 22.7 THER E- OF TO REVISE THE SIGN CODE CONTAINED THEREIN. COUNCIL MEMB ER NEA L MOVED TO PAS S COUNC I L BIL L NO. 22, SERIES OF 1982, ON FIRST READING, AND TO ESTABLISH 7 :30 P.M. ON MAY 10, 1982, FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as fo llo ws : Ayes : Nays : Absent : Co uncil Members Higday, Neal , Fitzpatri c k, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Coun c il Members Weist , Otis. Mayor Pro Te rn Bradshaw declared th e mot ion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 18 SERIES OF 198 2 * * * * * * A RESOLUT I ON AM ENDING ST AN DAR DS FO R THE ELIGI BILITY OF PERSO NS WHO APP LY FO R DEFER RA L OF PA YM ENT OF SPECI AL ASSESSMEN TS AGAINST THE I R PROPER TY OCCUPIED AS THEIR RESIDENCE PU RSU AN T TO '69 ENGLE- WOOD MU NICIP AL CODE, TITLE XII, CHAPTER 1.5 . COUNCI L MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 18, SERIES OF 1982. Council M mber Silo conded the motion. Upon a c 11 of the roll , the vot result d as follows : Aye : Higd y, Neal, Fitzpatric, N ys : Non . Absen Council M mb rs W it, Otis . Mayor Pro Tm Br dsh w d cl rd th motion ca r ri d • • I • • - • • Apr il 5, 1 982 Page 17 • • • City Manag er McCown stated taff would re-notify the p r o perty owners in proposed Pavin District No . 28 of the ne w gui delines. RESOLUTION NO. 19 SERIES OF 1982 * * * * * * A RESOL UTION ADOPTING ENGLEWOOD PUBL IC LIBRARY GUIDELI NES AND REQUIRING NOT I CE TO CI TY COUNCIL OF ANY CHAN GE IN PUBLIC LI BR ARY POLICY. COUNC IL MEMB ER NEA L MOVED TO PAS S RESOLUTION NO . 19, SERIES OF 1982. Counci l Membe r F itzpat r i ck s econded t h e mot ion. Upon a call of the roll , the vo t e r e s ulted as follo ws: Ayes : Nays : Absent : Co un cil Memb ers Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradsh aw . None. Council Members We is t, Ot i s. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw de c lared t he moti on c arr i ed. * * * * * * CO UNC I L MEMB ER FITZPATRI CK MOV ED TO APPROVE A PRO CLAMA - TION DE CLAR I NG THE WEEK OF APRIL 18 THRO UG H APRIL 24, 1982, AS "ENGLEWOOD VOLU NTEE R WEEK". Cou n cil Member Higday seconded the mot ion. Up on a c a ll of t h e roll, the vote resulted as follo ws: Ayes : Nays : Absent : Cou n cil Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council M rob rs Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tero Bradshaw d clared the motion carried, * * * * * * City Attorn y DeWitt tr nsmitted a memorandum regarding Hall Property/Centennial Park r garding the r ceipt nd option con- tract for th Hall prop rty . Mr. D Witt not d th contract con- tined n scrow provi ion to nsur th t the donation of $10,000 ism de to the City • • I • • • April 5 , 1982 Page 18 • • • Mr. DeWitt s tated if there were no obj ections t o the contract, he would proceed with the agreement. Tilere wer e no o b- jections. * * * * * * City Attorney DeWitt transmitted a memorandum concern - ing Raymond Lovelady v. City of Englewood. Mr. DeWitt stated the EEOC ruled that no probable cause existed t o believe ra cial discrimination occurr e d in the City's refusal t o reemplo y Mr. Lovelady. * * * * * * City Attorney DeWitt transmitted a memorandum concern- ing the Water Quality Control Commission litigation up d ate. * * * * * * City Attorney DeWitt transmitted an opi nion c oncerning the assessment deferral ord i nance. Discussion ensued regarding whether or no t interest was intended to be charged in the amount deferred. City Attorney DeWi t t stated he wanted to do f urther research in order to offe r vari o us alternatives to Co uncil on this matter. * * * * * * City Attorney De Witt transmitt ed an o pi n i on con cerning E .C.B.F . -d o na tions to t he Ma l l e y Cen t r Trust Fund . Th opin- ion stated the E .C.B .F. has authority to make donations to the City . * * * * * * City Attorn y D Witt n upd te on the nimal pound gre m nts. Mr. D Witt st t d th r is philosophy ch ng in respect to them thod o entering into the contr ct. Also, he i developing flexibility for the City so that cost increases or chang s c n be pas don imm di t ly if Co un cil ao desir s . * * * * * * In r g rd to an upd te on Mrs . H b night's r qu st for cros ing gu rds, City Attorn y D Witt report d h h d contact d Rich rd Simon, ttorn y for th achool di trice . Hr . Simon is akin up th matt r o coop r tiv typ of agr b t w nth I • • • • • • April 5, 1982 Page 19 two entities. Mr. DeWitt stated Mr. Simon was to call him back as soon as possible. Council Member Fitzpatrick reported that Roscoe Davidson sent Mrs. Habenight a letter; and that the matter of the crossing guards was still being discussed. Council Member Bilo stated there was a possibility of a crossing light being changed. City Manager McCown stated the police department is running a radar check and patrolling the street during school hours. * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO AOOPT THE PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 18 -24, 1982, AS "PROFESSIONAL SECRETARY'S WEEK". Council Member Fitzpatrick seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays: Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatri c k, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * City Attorney DeWitt announced the following notice of case dates: 1. April 13 and 14 -Wing & Welbourne grievance before the Career Service Board. 2. April 20 -Court of Appe 1 h ring on the water tow r. 3. April 26 -Ar pahoe County nary injuction hearing to Commission order with r sp store case). District Court will hear prelimi- nforce the Planning nd Zoning ct to Rocky Mountain, Inc. (book * * * * * * City Attorn y O Wl tat t d th p riod for th peal by Rob rt Orak to com forw rd to proteat hist rmlnatlon has almost transpired. * * * * * I • • April 5, 1982 Page 20 • • • City Attorney DeWitt stated he would be on vacation May 3 -May 7. Assistant City Attorney Tom Holland would appear in his absence at the meeting on May 3. * * * * * * City Manager McCown presented a Council Communication from the Director of Public Works concerning the bus for the Farmers Market, COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO POSTPONE THE MATTER UNTIL THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING ON APRIL 19, 1982. Council Member Fitzpatrick seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * City Manager McCown presented a Council Communication from the Director of Community Development concerning the Official City Seal. Mr. McCown noted the recommendations were found on page 2 of the communication. Mr. Mccown stated Ms. Romans of Com- munity Development Department was concerned about the impression of the present seal not being effective. It is difficult to see and it cannot be reproduced on a copy to show that the document carries the Offi cial Seal. Council Member Bilo passed around some brochures and pointed out that various cities have th ir own logo. The Chamber of Comm rce has it own logo. Mr. Bilo stated the use of the logo should be restricted. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw stated the recommendations were lenient and deserved another look. Council Member Fitzpatrick stated it has been stated that any time you use the City logo on anythin~ the assumption is going to b that it is either sponsored by the City or regulated by the City which if passed around fre ly, the Council will not have the authority but will t k th brunt of the load for it. Mr. Fitzp trick recomm nd db ing very restrictive on the use . • I • • - • April 5, 1982 Page 21 • • • Council Member Higday stated the matter needed to be dis- cussed in a study session. Council Member Neal stated the City should also be re- strictive, but should not reject any or all use. COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO ACCEPT RECOMMENDATIONS #1 AND #3 AND RENUMBER #3 TO #2; AND REFER ANYTHING ELSE TO A STUDY SESSION. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bi lo, Br ad shaw. None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * City Manager McCown presented a Council Communication from the Directors of Finance and Public Works concerning the a- ward of bid for the street sweeper. Mr. McCown recommended award- ing the bid to FMC based on the difference in fuel and broom costs over a five-year period. COUNCIL MEMBER SILO MOVED TO ACCEPT THE BID FROM BOOTH ROUSE IN THE AMOUNT OF $62,309 FOR A STREET SWEEPER. Council Mem- ber Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays : Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal , Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried. * * * * * * RESOLUTION NO. 20 SERIES OF 1982 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE GENERAL FUND AND THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND 1982 BUDGET • • I • • • Apri l 5, 198 2 Page 22 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO PASS RESOL UTION NO. 20, SERIES OF 1982. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes: Nays: Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion carried, * * * * * * City Manager McCown announced the tour of the Brady project inc-downtown Denver would be April 24, 1982 , at 9 :00 a.m. * * * * * * Council set April 12, 1982, at 5 :00 p.m. as the time to meet with the Court Advisory Committee. * * * * * * Council instructed staff to forward a copy the City Attorney's opinion concerning donations to the Malley Trust Fund by the Englewood Centennial Bi-Centennial Commission to the E.C.B.F. members. * * * * * * COUN CIL MEMBER HI GDAY MOVE D TO ALLOW THE HANGING OF A BANN ER AC RO SS SOUTH BROADWAY FROM APR IL 1 2, 198 2 -APR IL 26 , 19 8 2, PRolJ.A I MING APR IL 25, 198 2, AS INTE RFAITH TASK FO RCE WALKDAY. Coun- cil ~ember Bilo second ed the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows : Ayes : Nays : Absent : Council Memb rs Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None, Council Members W 1s t, Otis . Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw d cl rd th motion carr i ed. It was th consensus of Council to pr sent the Gr a n d Marshall of InterFaith Task Force W lkd y, D Land Peterson, wi th a proclama i~n at then xt Council m tin on April 19. Mai da Navia w s to b invit d to cc pt it with him. * * * * * * • I • • - • • • • April 5, 1982 Page 23 City Manager McCown stated notice of the revised assess- ment deferral program would be sent out to property owners in pro- posed Paving District No. 28. * * * * * * It was the consensus of Council to handle the assess- ment of Rex Horne, 3002 W. Grand Avenue, in proposed Paving Dis- trict No. 28, on an administrative basis pending the report from Sellards & Griggs. 10 :48 p.m. * * * * * * 'Dlere was no further business to discuss. * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Mayor Otis adjourned the meeting without a vote at • I • • • April 5, 1982 Page 8 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO DELETE SECTION BAND RE- NUMBER C TO B. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist, Otis. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion carried. COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO AMEND THE MOTION AND ADD IN SECTION 6 UNDER TOTAL COST THE AMOUNT OF $1,031,420 AND UNDER COST TO THE CITY THE AMOUNT OF $200,000. Council Mem- ber Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays: Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Bradshaw. None. Council Members Weist , Otis. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared the motion carried, Council Member Higday stated he could not vote favorably on the bill as written. Council Member Neal stated he would vote in favor of the bill on first reading but may vote against it later at the second reading. Mr. Neal acknowledged the economic burden place on the prop rty owner. Mr. Neal stated paving districts, in gen- eral, needed to be realigned to go for those streets that are in specifi c n d so the property owner can see the actual and tangible ne d. Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw suggested taking another look at redoing paving districts and devise a method of forewarning, Upon a c 11 of the roll, the vote on the original mo-tion resulted as follows: Ay s : Council M mb rs Ne 1, Fitzpatrick, Bilo, Br dsh w. N ys : Council M mb r Higday. • I • • - • • REGULAR MEETING: • • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO April 19, 1982 /b 'lhe City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, met in regular session on April 19, 1982, at 7 :30 p.m. Mayor Otis, presiding, called the meeting to order. 'lhe invocation was given by Reverend Vance Willett, First Baptist Church, 3170 South Broadway. The pledge of al- legiance was led by Boy Scout Troops #115 and #154. Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Absent : Council Member Fitzpatrick, 'lhe Mayor declared a quorum present. * * * * * * Also present were : City Manager Mccown City Attorney DeWitt Deputy City Clerk Watkins * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF MARCH 29, 1982. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays: Abs nt : Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Fitzpatrick. Mayor Otis declared the motion carried. * * * * * * COU NCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 25, 1982, AS "INTERFAITH WALK DAY", Council Member Neal s cond d the motion. Upon a c 11 of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: • I • • n - • • • • April 19, 1982 Page 2 Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Fitzpatrick. Mayor Otis declared the motion carried. Mayor Otis presented the proclamation to pre-scheduled visitors DeLand Peterson, Grand Marshall of the Interfaith Task Force Walk Day, and to Maida Navia, Director of Interfaith Task Force. Mrs. Navis and DeLand gave their appreciation. Mayor Otis declared a recess at 7 :43 p.m. to congradu- late DeLand for being Grand Marshall. Council reconvened at 7:45 p.m. Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Absent : Council Member Fitzpatrick. The Mayor declared a quorum present. * * * * * * Pre-scheduled visitor, John S. Cyborn , 2906 W. Union Avenue, appeared before Council. Mr. Cyborn referred to a letter from residents in the West Union area concerning conditions on West Union as being hazardous. Mr. Cyborn stated traffic of heavy equipment has caused damage to the street as well as threatened children playing in the neighborhood. Mr. Cyborn requested the following remedy to his problem : 1) overlay the street; 2) post traffic reglations ; 3) require parking across the street; and 4 ) install crosswalks or speed bumps. Mayor Otis stated Council has directed the police de- partment to go patrol the area; and has asked for a report from the Traffic Engineer. * * * * * * There were no other visitors at this time. • * • * * • were: "Communications -No Action Recol'llll nded" on the agenda • I • • April 19, 1982 Page 3 (a ) (b ) (c) (d ) • • • Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of March 16, 1982. Minutes of the Liquor License Authority meet- ing of April 7, 1982. Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of April 8, 1982. Memorandum from the Director of Employee Re- lations to the City Manager concerning his attendance at the NPELRA Conference in Clear- water Beach , Florida. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ACCEPT "COMMUNICATIONS - NO ACTION RECOMMENDED" AGENDA ITEMS 5(A) -5(0). Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw , Otis. None. Council Member Fitzpatrick . Mayor Otis declared the motion carried. * * * * * * City Manager Mccown presented a Council Communication from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of April 6, 1982, concerning an amendment of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Section 22.4-10 and 22.4-11, which would provide rules and regu- lations to est blishments that have as their primary use of en- tertainment vid o games. Mr. Mccown noted a public hearing was requir don the proposed amendment. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY AT- TORNEY TO PREPARE AN ORDINANCE. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a c 11 of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays: Ab nt : Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Non. Council Memb r Fitzpatrick. Mayor Oti d clar d th motion c rried. * * * * * * I • • • April 19, 1 982 Page 4 • • • City Manager Mccown presented a Council Communication from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of April 6, 1982, concerning the findings of facts for the amendments to Section 22.4-11 h of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance relating to motor vehicle repair businesses and motor vehicle laundry or polishing businesses, establishing those businesses as conditional uses in the B-2, Business, Zone District. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO RECEIVE THE FINDINGS OF FACT. Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes : Nays: Abs ent: Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Fitzpatrick, Mayor Otis declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1982 * * * * * * BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUNCIL BlLL NO. 22 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING METER CUSTOMERS FROM REVERTING TO A FLAT RATE ACCOUNT. COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 2 2 , SERIES OF 1982 , ON FIRST READING. Council Member Bilo seconded the mo t i on. Coun c il Member Neal opposed the bill. Mr. Neal endorsed the po l ic y and stated a resolution would be more approriate. Mr. Neal stated there may be a time when an exception would have to be m de and an ordinance gives it the force of a law which would take t wo readings to change it. Council Member Bradshaw noted there would be two read- i ngs of the bill which would allow two chances for citizens to pe k on them tter. Council M mb r Higday st t d n 1th r the Water and Sewer Bo ard nor th at ff could s e ny xc ption. 'l'h ordinance adds mor e r d nc t o th policy. • I • • - • • April 19, 1982 Page 5 • • • Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes: Nays: Absent : Council Members Higday, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. Council Member Neal. Council Member Fitzpatrick. Mayor Otis declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. SE RI ES OF 1982 * * * * * * BY AUTHORITY A BI LL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 23 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BILO AN ORD I NAN CE APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO , AND THE DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE PROVIS ION OF SERVICES BY THE CITY IN THE EXECUTION OF THE DENVER REGIO NA L URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM AND FOR REIMBURSEMENT BY THE COUNCIL OF GO VERNMEN TS TO THE CITY OF ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS NOT EXCEED- ING $10,000 . COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 23, SE RIES OF 19 8 2. Co un ci l Member Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the ro ll , the vote resulted as follows : Ayes : Nays : Absent : Council Members Higday , Neal , Weist, Bilo , Brad shaw, Otis . None. Council Member Fitzpatrick . Mayor Otis declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 198 2 * * * * * * BY AUTHO RITY A BILL FOR COUN CI L BI LL NO . 2 4 I NTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW I . • - • April 19, 1982 Page 6 • • • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 7, CHAPTER 1.5, OF THE TITLE XII, OF THE ASSESSMENT DEFERRAL ORDINANCE OF ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE OF 1969, AS AMENDED, LIMITING PAYMENT OF INTEREST TO A 10-YEAR PERIOD OF TIME. COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 24, SERIES OF 1982. 'nlere was no second and the motion died. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1982 * * * * * * BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 26 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER BILO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 7, CHAPTER 1.5, TITLE XII , OF THE ASSESSMENT DEFERRAL ORDINANCE OF ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE OF 1969, AS AMENDED, LIMITING PAYMENT OF INTEREST TO AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO THE ASSESSMENT DEFERRED. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 26, SERIES OF 1982. Council Member Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays : Absent: Council Members Bilo, Bradshaw , Otis. Council Memb ers Higday, Neal, Weist. Council Member Fitzpatrick. Mayor Otis declared the motion defeated. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1982~~ * * * * * * BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 25 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ~~~~~~- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 7, CHAPTER 1.5, OF TITLE XII, OF THE ASSESSMENT DEFERRAL ORDINANCE OF ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE OF 1969, AS AMENDED, PROVIDING THAT NO INTEREST SHALL BE PAID ON A DEFERRED ASSESSMENT • • I . • April 19, 1982 Page 7 • • - COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO TABLE COUNCIL BILL NO. 25, SERIES OF 1982. Council Member Bilo seconded the mo- tion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows : Ayes : Nays : Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Fitzpatrick. Mayor Otis declared the motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1982 * * * * * * BY AUTHORITY A BI LL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 27 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH VARIOUS CITIES OF THE COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE AND BROWN, BORTZ AND CODDINGTON RELATING TO DENV ER/ARAPAHO E COUN TIES FISCA L FLOW STU DY. COUNC IL MEMBER NEAL MOVE D TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 27, SER I ES OF 198 2 , ON FI RST READING. Co un c i l Member Bradshaw s eco nd e d the motion. Up on a c a ll of the r oll, the vote resulted as follo ws: Ayes : Nays : Absent : Coun cil Members Higd ay, Ne al, We ist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis . None . Council Memb r Fitzpatrick. Mayor Otis declared the motion carried . * * * * * * City Attorn y DeWitt tran1mitt d the opin ion a n d ruling from Judge Gately in th matter of Soon Y Scott d/b/a Ne w Tokoyo Massage vs. City of Englewood in which th Judger manded the m tter to Council for a new haring. Hr. De Witt not d he wo u ld submit his opinion to Council on thi1 att rat th m ting on Hay 3, I • • • April 19 , 1982 Page 8 • • • COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO RECEIVE THE OPINION AND RULING -SOON YE SCOTT D/B/A NEW TOKOYO MASSAGE VS. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays: Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis, None. Council Member Fitzpatrick. Mayor Otis declared the motion carried. * * * * * * City Attorney DeWitt announced the matter of Rich vs . City of Englewood (water tower case) was being heard in the Cour t of Appeals at 1 :30 p.m. tomorrow (April 20, 1982). * * * * * * City Manager Mccown presented a Council Communication from the Director of Public Works concerning the bus for the Farmer 's Market. CO UNCI L MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO TABLE THE MATTER. Counc i l Member Higday seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows : Ay e s: Na y s: Absent : Co un ci l Member s Hi gday , Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw , Otis. None . Council Member Fitzpatrick. Mayor Otis d clar d th motion carri d. * * * * * * City H nag r HcCown pr sent d a Council Co1111unication from th Dir ctor of Finance cone rning th 1981 G n ral Fun d Budget and the 1981 Golf Cours Fund Bud g t. Hr. Mccown ex plained the ppropriation waa $62,434 from th 198 1 G n ral Fund to t h 1981 Golf Cour Fund and appropriatin an additional $1 8 ,60 5 to th Golf Coura Fund for th purpo1 1 of co1111oditi I and contrac- ual a rvic I for th 1981 budg t y ar . I • ...... • • • - Apr i l 19 , 1982 Pag e 9 RESOLUTION NO. 21 SERIES OF 1982 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1981 GENERAL FUND AND THE 1981 GOLF COURSE FUND BUDGET. COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 21, SERIES OF 1982. Council Member Bradshaw seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows: Ayes : Nays : Absent : Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis. None. Council Member Fitzpatrick. Mayor Ot i s declared the mot ion carried. * * * * * * Mayor Otis announced that Mr. McCown has received an award for programs the City of Englewood participated in from DRCOG in the amount o f $151 ; and that Mr. McCown has decided t o donate it to t he P arks and Recreation Trust Fund. * * * * * * Coun cil Mem ber Bradshaw discussed th e City Hall pro per ty, and if it was possible the new owner of th e mo rtgage , Guard ian Life Insurance, to be making an o f fer as the o ld one d id. City Manager McCo wn stated it was possib l e b ut not pro- bable. Mr. McCown stated he could inve s tigate the po s sibilitie • * * * * * * Th r waa no furth r discuaaion. * * * * * * COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Mayor Otta adjourn d them ting withou t a vot at 8 :15 p.m. I • • - Mr. Eugene L. Otis Mayor City of Englewood 3400 South Elati Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Mr. Otis: • • • April 23, 1982 Within the past year the University of Colorado has mounted a major effort aimed at providing advanced managenent training for public officials. We have already led a highly successful management conference of ten-days duration for state and local officials in Estes Park this past January, and others are planned for this suTJr.1er and for succeeding years. One of the comments that we heard most often from mayors and council members during the recruitment process for participants late last year was that 10 days away from job and family was just too long for training related to perfonnance in a part-time position like city council member or state legislator. We have sought to respond to that point by offering a shorter session of 2 1/2 days length specifically for mayors and experienced council members. As Director of the Center for the Improvement of Public Management at the Uni versity of Colorado, I would like to invite you and one of your council members to attend our first such training session for elected city officials lay 20, 21, and 22 at Peaceful Valley Ranch near Boulder. We expect to put on such a training sessi on annually in the future at about this tfme each year. Thfs training fs meant to be complementary to that provided by the Colorado Municipal League for newly elected officials and fs intended for those members of councils who have served long enough to be entering leadership positions such as mayor, mayor pro tetn, council president, COG representative, or other fnf1uentia1 roles wfthin the leadership of council, connfttees or intergovernmental agencies. We are looking for som thirty partfcfpants from Front Range c011111u~itfes in Colorado and hope to have two representatives fro11 the council of each c011111Unity that chooses to participate. If there is someon from your council and/or staff that can manage the ten-dt,y program in August we would prefer that they waft for that • Advisory 801rd Member, ~rsNII K,p1.n. Ctl•lrman ~ICf'l,rd flem1n9, Yl<.• Chairm an Tlmou,y W Scnuttt. Vice Chalrm•n Pr ivate Se nor H Lff Amb•os. 1.,:..11~ -. ..... ~,n UIIIH C• J"I N -•~S Su Public Sector Har-,, i!;:,.-..1 "-•nrt tn Ci !Lit<M ,,., H~" •"9 ·'' Cit C.,.,1 o< ~pp,u c, •. 9 "0< ,n Thto ~V"" Ill ,ii N ~I~ Jf Un1 vers n jlt .,., •· ...,., Tom (l"Of\olll J8'lft .... *" .. ' .. JeMUY-~ '-'-"" -·- I • • Mr. Eugene L. Ot i s Mayor Ci ty of Englewood 3400 South Elati Englewood, CO 80110 De ar Mr. Otis: • • - April 23, 1982 Within the past year the University of Colorado ha s mounted a najor effort aimed at providing advanced managenent training for pub l i c offi ci als. ~e have already led a highly successful ma nagement co nference of ten-days duration for state and local officials i n Estes Park this past January, and others are planne d for this sur.T.ler and for succeeding years. One of the comments that we heard most often from mayors and council members during the re c ru i tment process for participants late last year was that 10 days away from job and family was just too long for training related to pe rfonnance in a part-ti me position like city council member or sta te leg i slator . We have sought to respond to that point by offering a shorter session of 2 1/2 days length specifi cally for mayo rs and ex perienced counc il me mbe r s. As Di re c tor of t he Ce nter for the Improvement of Public anagem e nt at the Univ e r s i t y of Colo rado, I would like to i nvite you and on e of your council mem be r s t o attend our first su c h training session f or e lected city off ici als 1ay 20 , 21, and 22 at Peaceful Va l ley Ranch near Boulder. We expect t o put on su ch a tra i ni ng sess ion annually i n the future at about th is t im e each year . This t raining is mea nt to be complementary t o that pr ovi ded by the Co l ora do un ic ipal League for newly el ec ted offi ci als and i s intended for those members of council s who have s erved long enough to be entering leadership posi t f ons suc h as ma,yor, mayor pro tem, c ounc i l president, COG re presen t ati ve, or other influential roles wi thin the leadership of cou nci l , comm fttees or intergovernmenta l agencies. We are lookin g for some th f rty participants from Front Range corm1u ~i t f es tn Colorado and hope to have two representatives from the cou ncf 1 of each connunf ty that chooses to participate. If there ts someo ne from your council and /or staff that can manage the ten-day pr ogram fn August we would pr e fer that they waft for that • AdYisory Board Members M•nru.ll K,1p lo1n . Ch•lrman ~lcn•rd f lem 1_ng , Ytce Chalrm.1n Ti motlYJI W Sct'tultl. Yiu Chairman Pri vate Sector H lee Ambros. Eu;e rt• C So""" T"'\orru Gnmui..iw Public Stctor l"l .&t "'Y • " ........ e f'l .>n •e-J•f Ctofllt C,1 C: Jpp.r Cra9 l\c,, "" Unt ~rs,, u 11,c .,., l·W'd ..... fomC,w,,. .Mftf1 Me 1on ~M NOI' • Adrtlie ~•IM °""-, ~, ~-"" -.u Ton,t tN ..... ---JoMC ....... .. ·~ ,.,,. 'I ,. ., I • Apri l 23, 1982 Page Two • • • oppor tunity as ft blends a complex group of state legislators, county commissi oners, council members, executive department heads of both state and local government and some city officials from neighboring states. With CML's traini ng for new council members, our twice annual ten-day Rocky Mountain Executive Programs, and this new 2 1/2 day training opportunity each year, we hop e that all of the management training needs of your council can be met fn Colo rado. An informal steering connfttee composed of mayors and council members has advised the Center on agenda content and has identified specific areas of interest based on their experiences fn council and fntergovermnental leadership roles. We have drawn from both the resources of the University of Colorado's several campuses (Denver, Boulder, Colorado Springs), and from the ranks of management consultants knowledgeable about the internal workings of Colorado municipal government. Some of the names and training themes may be familiar to you from individual city council/staff retreats and perhaps have even been done for your specific community. The materials discussed here and the nature of the participant group will focus on new issues of individual and group leadership styles, management control systems, program evaluation, co nflict management and staff direction, all with the policy-making body fn mind. I would like to appear on an upcoming council agenda to discuss this training opportunity and our su11111er program with you. Within the next several days I will contact your city manager to facilitate this process. In the following paragraphs, individual faculty members are described and the general themes for discussion identified. A tentative agenda for the 2 1/2 da.ys is attached, as is an application form. Cost per individual is $250 which include s all training materials, instruction, and room and meals from the Thursda.y lunc h through Saturday afternoon. We're excited about the scope of this workshop and feel that we 've obtained the services of an outstanding faculty. We equally expect a knowledgeable and energetic group of participants to interact with you or r.iembers of your council who choose to participate. Lyle Sumek and Carl Neu have pioneered in the the use of video simulations of city governments in action. Their work for the Texas l't.lnicipal League, for individu al conmunities in Oregon, Iowa , Minnesota and Colorado, and for banks and hospitals has facilitated the discussion of policy board/staff relations, goal setting, leadership styles, group dynamics and personn 1 evaluation in many retreat and workshop settings. Their simulations of fiscal discussions in a 111Ythfcal Texas c011111Unity will provide much of the framework of discussion for the 2 1/2 days. Lyle is former Associate Dean of the Gr aduate School of Public Affairs in Boulder, and a former staff assistant to th city council of San Diego, California. Carl recently completed 4 years of service on the Lake wood , Colorado city council and served there as council president. • I • • April 23, 1982 Page Three • • • Roger Durand, as Associate Dean of the Graduate School of Public Affairs in Colorado Springs, brings both academic and practical experience to the issues of public management. He has worked extensively in policy and management issues in the health care field, and has been the administrator of several federal programs where management information and program evaluation were key to administrative and policy implementation success. He will deal here with those control and evaluation issues from the standpoint of policy-making boards. Elaine Yarborough, a faculty member in connunications at the University of Colorado at Boulder, has just completed a conflict-management workshop for city managers at their recent state conference. Well received by the managers' group, her presentation emphasizes the healtt,y engagement of conflict in organizations and interpersonal relations and teaches means of creatively moving through conflict situations toward successful outcomes. Dail Neugarten specializes in organizational development and personnel issues in public manageaent. Her presentations will emphasize team building skills for coping with many of the organizational situations arising i n i ntra-council and council/staff work situations. She is Associate Dean of the Graduate School of Publ i c Affairs of the Uni vers i ty of Colorado at Denver. Robert Burco, as Director of the Center for the Improvement of Publ ic Hanageant brings first-hand knowledge of the infonnation and leadership needs of policy board llletllbers from his prior experience as advisor to leg i slative bodies at local, state and federal level s and as cabinet secretary for Transportation in Oregon State Gover....ent. Keeping the di scussions and materials presented at such training sessions relevant to the concerns of elected policy-makers is his pr i aary responsibility fn the conference leader role. We have reserved a number of cab i ns and rooms at Pea cefu l Va l ley Guest Ra nch between Boulder and Estes Park for this conference . The ranch i s eas ily acc ess i ble and i s approximatel y one and one-half hours fl'OII Denver . This should prov ide a qu i et , res i dent i al setti ng for participant s to c oncentra te on the wo r ks hop co nten t away froa t he di stracti ons of day -to-d ay stress . We have arranged the schedule to allow 1111Ple time for attendees to get to kno w one another, and to sh are fnfonnation about issues fn their varying c011111Unftfes . We will take care of the details of room and conference arrangements ff you wf11 submit fnfonn ation to us on the enclosed applic ation form. RAB : s Enclosur s : Conference Agenda Applicatio n Forw Very trul~o;rs,,, ~ ~u /_.u~ Ro be rt A. Burco Di re ctor Ce nter for the I111Proveeient of Publi c Man ag eNnt Pe aceful Valley Gu st Ranch Brochu I • • MAY 20 • • • • COUNCIL MEMBERS/MAYORS CONFERENCE PEACEFUL VALLEY GUEST RANCH, COLORADO MAY 20, 21, 22 1:00 -2:00 2:00 -2:20 2:20 -2:30 2:30 -5: 30 5:45 -6 :30 6:30 -7:30 8:00 -10:00 10:00 -11 :00 7:30 -8:30 8:30 -10:20 11 :00 -12:00 12:00 -1:00 1 :30 -2:30 2:30 -5:30 5:45 -6:30 6:30 -7:30 8:00 -10:00 7:30 -8:30 9:00 -10: 30 10:00 -12:00 12:00 -1 :00 1:00 -2:30 2 :45 -4:00 4:00 TENTATIVE SCHEDULE Optional Lunch Registration Burco-Introduction Sumek/Neu: -Introduction -Council/Staff Teanwork -Council Effectiveness in Defining Agendas, Developing Roles Cock ta i1 s Dinner Roger Durand: -Policy Development, Implementation and Management Information Systems for Control Optional Small Gatherings Breakfast Sumek/Neu: -Council Effectiveness in Changing Arenas and Stages of Development Roger Durand: -Program Evaluation Overview Lunch Sumek/Neu: -Introduction to Pressures and conflict on Individuals and Organizations Elaine Yarborough: -Conflict Management Cocktails Dinner Small Group Meetings for Discussion and Skill Building -Independent Leadership Skills-Durand -Conflict Management-Yarborough -Team Building-Neugarten Breakfast Neu/Sumek: -Structuring the Council Work Load Neugarten: -Group Performance of Teams Lunch Neu: -Evaluating the Manager Neugart n: -Team Building Exercises, Rol O finition, Delegation and Cooperation Burco: -Conclusion • I . • -• • • APPLICATION COUNCIL MEMBERS/MAYOR TRAINHIG CONFERENCE MAY 20, 21 , 22, 1982 PLEASE RETURN TO : Robert A. Burco, Director, Center for the Improvement of Public Management, 511 16th Street, Room 220, Denver, CO 80202, 629-5278 NAME OF C()1MUNITY: MAYOR/COUNCIL PARTICIPANTS : NPlolE ______________ _ NAME--------------TITLE _____________ _ TITLE _____________ _ WORK ADDRESS __________ _ WORK ADDRESS __________ _ PHONE _____________ _ PHONE _____________ _ HOME ADDRESS ------------~E ADDRESS __________ _ PHONE ---------------PHONE _____________ _ YEARS ON COUNCIL ________ _ YEARS ON COUNCIL _________ _ Please provide below a brief description of your co11111Unity in terms of populat ion, city program responsibilities, annual budget, number of employees, memberships of council, organization chart of top staff members. Identify the several issues of greatest concern to your council in the coming few years such that they might provide discussion material for this workshop. I make application for participation in this training program of the University of Colorado on behalf of the City of which authorizes payment of $250.00 per participant. DATE MAYOR I . • • • - BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO MARCH 10, 1982 MINUTES The regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals was called to orde r at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Roge r Gage. MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: ALSO PRESENT: Kreiling, Seymour , Gage, Brown , Dawson, Leonard Hallagin Dorothy Romans , Assistant Director -Planning Yenglin, Planner I Coleman, Recording Sec retary I I I I I BOARD MEMBER SEYMOUR MOVED TO APPROVE THE MIN UTES OF THE FEBRUARY 10 , 1982 REGULAR MEETING OF THE BO ARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEA LS. Board member Da wson seconded the motion. Upon call of the roll , all members voted in the affirmative. Th e minutes stand APPROVED as wri tten. CASE No . 2 -8 2 I I I I I FOERSTER I NVE ST MENTS Carl M. Duncan 3060 S . Acoma Tis case was brought before he Board of Adjustmen and Appeals, ho wever, no on represen ing Fors er Inv s mens appear d. BOARD MEMBER LEONARD MADE A OTIO TO TABI,E THIS CASE UNTIL THE EXT MF.ETINO, Board member Kreiling s conded. Upon call of th roll, all memb rs voted in th ff1rmat1ve, n Cs No . 2-82 will be tabl dun 11 hen x m 1ng . • I • • • • • - * * * * * CASE NO. 3-82 ARLO L. NIELSON 4700 S . Cherokee REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a variance from the Maximum Height for an accessory use of 15 feet to 18 feet for the purpose of const ructing a garage. This is a variance from the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance Section 22.4-4 1.(1) (a) -Accessory Building and Accessory Permitted Uses. Cha irman Gage stated that he had verification of posting of the subject property. Applicant Nielson was brought forward and s worn in. Mr. Nielson stated that he wanted to build a garage with an oversize height so that he would have ceiling storage, plus it woul d accommodate the additional height of the camper on his pickup truck. He stated that he had contact ed his neighbors and found no objections on their part. The size was discussed and it was found to be under the maximum limit of 1,000 ft. Special doors wou ld have to be installed. It is to be built of frame and Masonite. BOARD MEMBER SEYMOUR MOVED THAT THE VARIANCE BE GRANTED. Board Member Bro wn seconded. All members voted in the affirmative. REQUEST HAS BEEN GRANTED. • * • * • Doro hy Romans, Assistant Director of Community Developmen reported tha there would be a public hearing on the Sign Code in May efore the City Council. The first rea ing of the bill would be at the nex meeting on April 5th . The Planning Commission is consi ering an amendment to the Zoning Ordin nee, whi ch will make Mo or Vehicle repair, garages and motor vehicle laundries (or car washes ) a condi- ional se. In April he Planning Commission will be considering amen m nts to the B-l Zoe Dis rict, regar ing fee-paid amusemen s , such as video g es, rcade s, etc ., in ord r to pl ce some sor of control over thes types of rcades as to where hey can b lu~at- ed. The Fence Code wi 1 also be added o the Zo 1ng Ordinance. Mrs. Romans stated th t ah would e the Board copies or hese chan a h y occur and would k p them p-o-da e. • • • • • A discu sh ld to th Board or Adjustment and Appe ls m tin llY with th Council nd Zon1n Commis ion. Mrs. Rom ns hat h would try to s up am etin af er Counc1 passes on h S1 Coe , if pos ible on a Wednesday, nd would le Bo rd know or e da • I • • n • • • * * * * * There being no further business before the Board , Chairman Gage adjourned t he March 10 , 1982 r egular meeting of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals at 8:20 p .m. * I * * * Recording Secretary I • • • • - ENGLEWOOD URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY March 10, 1982 I . CAL L TO ORDER. The special meeting of the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority was called to order at 5:30 P.M. by Chairman Robert G. Powell. Members present: Cole, McClung, Minnick, Powell, Voth Powers, Executive Secretary Members absent: Dickinson, Fitzpatrick, Alternate Novicky Also present: Planning Technician Jeri Linder City Attorney DeWitt Steve Bell, Hanifen-Imhoff, Inc. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Chairman Powell stated that the Minutes of the Special Meeting of February 24 , 1982, were to be considered for approval. Minnick moved: McClung seconded: The Minutes of February 24, 1982, be approved as written. AYES: McClung, Minnick, Powell, Voth, Cole NAYS: None ABSENT: Dickinson, Fitzpatrick Th motion carried. III. Chairman Pow 11 read a lett r to Ms. Jan And r on fr Mayor Oti thanking her for her contribution to th Urb n R newal Authority durin h r t nur • I V. URBAN RENEWAL PLAN. R vi w of Draft r. itz:p tri k nt r d th tin • • I • • -• • - -2- Ms . Powers s tated that the City Council adopted the final Downtown Plan at their meeting on March 8, 1982. The Urban Renewal Plan should be con- sis tent with the Downtown Plan as approved and adopted by the City Council. Ms. Powers reviewed the proposed Urban Renewal Plan section-by-section. She pointed out that the policies contained in Section IV were the policies adopted by the City Planning and Zoning Coonnission, the City Council, and the Englewood Downtown Development Authority in November, 1981. These policies were the basis of the Downtown Plan, and are also a basis for the Urban Renewal Plan. Section V, Development Plan, was then reviewed. Ms. Powers stated that there are no commitments from the developer yet, but included in this portion of the plan is what the Authority wants him to do in order to finance the public improvements. Ms. Powers stated that graphics will be included in this section of the plan. Also reviewed was the budget for the public improvements, and an attempt has been made to come up with the maximum and minimum figures on these costs. The private projects which have been proposed in the Development Plan include two high-rise buildings to be located along the Girard Avenue Mall. Ms. Powers stated that a 75 foot se tback is proposed for these high-rise buildings from the mall. Mr. Minnick asked who established the 75 foot figure on the setback? Ms. Powers stated that Design Workshop suggested the 75 foot figure, based on the shadows cast by a ten-story building, and the space needed for the s maller scale buildings on the mall. Ms. Powers s tated that a set of de- velopment guidelines is being prepared which are to b reviewed by the de- veloper (Brady Enterprises). Ms. Powers discussed the proposed phasing of the proposed development in the downtown area , which phasing plan was dated February 11, 1982. She stated that this phasing plan is based on an eight-year build-out period. Ms . Powers stated that she fel t the s ction of the proposed Urban Renewal Plan that will hav th most impact is that dealing with "Implem nt tion". Ms . Powers point d out that the City Council and Urban Renewal Authori y will not be aggr i.siv on condemn tion, but condemn tion must b di c u d in th Plan so th t it may be don 1f d t nnln d to b n c ssary. L nd Disposi tion wa lso discuss d. Ms. stated that if th City o r Urban Ren wal Authority procures off r 1 to dev loper for purch and t th n d v lop th t 1 nd ln ccord nc wlth th Agr nts b of Englewood Th m nt. • nd th Mr. B 11 which nt hie I • • • • • -3- shopping center would be a great assist in marketing the bonds. Mr. Bell stated that he anticipated the City Council would be in opposition to this proposal, because Cinderella City is a tax generating force for the City at the present time. Mr. McClung asked if there was a way that a portion of the revenues from Cinderella City could be pledged toward retirement of the bonds? He then asked if Cinderella City could be made a separate district? Mr. Bell stated that if a portion of the revenues from Cinderella City were pledged, then only a portion of the revenues from the entire district could be pledged. Mr. Bell discussed what he felt might be legal ramifications re- sulting from making Cinderella City a separate tax increment district. Further discussion ensued. Ms. Powers inquired about the possibility of pledging 75% of sales tax revenues and 100% of the property tax revenues toward the bond issue? Mr. Fitzpatrick sta ted that he felt sure the City Council would take a dim view of including Cinderella Ci t y in the tax in- crement district. Ms. Cole stated that she could understand th reluctance of the City Council to includ th Cinderella City Shopping Center within the tax increm nt district, because it is of benefit to the entire community and provides th majority of th revenue for the City. Further discussion ensued. Mr. B 11 point d out chat if Cinderella City were to b included, only the s al s tax incr as bov th l vel at which the fr ez would take effect would b used coward the bond issue. Mr. Fitzpatrick discussed the efforts of the City Council to bank monies for the Littl Dry Creek improvement proj ct. H s tated that at the pr ent tim , th r is approximately $3,000,000 which is earmarked for the Littl Dry Cr proj ct; thy hop to have approximately $4 ,500,000 for this proj c t b th nd of thi y r. Discus ion followed. Mr. Bell point d out that no m tt r what th City h t aside for the Little Dry Cr ek project, th initial bond issu will hav to b for approximat ly $10 ,000,000; h s t t d th t this will cov r th con truccion bonds and th non-t bonds nt until moni s b gin c ing in from th di - trict. Mr. Pow tat d th th und r toed th $10,000 ,000 bond i su would b for th first phas of th rd v lopm nt proj ct. Mr. B 11 stat d that th improv nt of Littl Dry Cre k would allow th privat d v lop- nt to b gin. • I • • n r • • • -4- might be "money ahead" were people encouraged to take an alternate route to South Broadway. Mr. McClung stated that he felt this is the first time the traffic situation on South Broadway has been discussed, and that nothing is being done to solve the traffic problems. He asked why the Authority could not review this matter and see if there is an alternative to the situation? Mr . Fitzpatrick stated that he felt the one alternative to the traffic si tuation on South Broadway would be to institute a one-way system, which would have to use either South Acoma Street or South Lincoln Street as the other street for the one-way couplet; he stated that the funds were not available to do this. Ms . Powers pointed out that the traffic study that has been submitted in- dicates that the street that needs improvement is U.S. 285; South Broadway can accommodate the increased traffic that is projected as a result of the redevelopment program. It is imperative that Floyd Avenue be realigned to eliminate going through two lights to travers from East Floyd Avenue t o West Floyd Avenue. She stated that the traffic study specifically mentions improvements to U.S . 285 and Floyd Avenue, and plans are being made to im- prove these two streets. Mr. McClung asked if property would have to be condemned in the realignment of the Floyd Avenue/South Broadway intersection? Ms. Powers indicated the routing proposed, and noted that it may not require the removal of any building; the engineers ar coming up with cost estimates now. Mr. Minnick inquired about improvements to th Santa Fe Driv /U.S. 285 inter- section . Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the on/off ramps to South Santa Fe Drive will be modified and improved. Mr. Minnick asked if the RTD light rail facility would s till be available if Santa Fe Drive were to be widened? Ms. Powers stated that th light rail facility is built into the plan for improvement of South Santa Fe Drive. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that the light rail system is planned as ( r south as Littleton; there will be a park'n'ride st tion planned, also. Ms. Powers stated that there is a Tr nsit Ce nt r pro- posed on the City-own d block t Bannock/Girard/Acoma and Floyd. RTD has th En lewood Tran it Cent r in their budget, nd w nts to know wh nth Urban Rn wal Plan is adopted. p nd qu or th r th n •1 i t b • pl n will 11 t d th th in- Council, Plannin com 1 writ throu H p K p t t d n h rl r I • -• • • -5- stated that she felt it would be important to show that the redevelopment that is proposed is not the "bare minimum", and that this is also needed by Steve Bell for the development of financing alternatives. Discussion ensued. Ms. Powers asked Mr. Bell if, when the Authority acts on the Urban Renewal Plan, if they would also be acting on the Tax Increment District ? Mr. Bell stated they would not; this would require separate action. Mr. Voth asked if additions or deletions of areas could be done if the work is to be done in phases? Mr. Bell stated if the total area is includ e d in the bond issuance for "Series A", a portion could not be deleted in subsequent iss uances. The implication of the reassessment of the downtown area o n a tax inc r e ment financing district and issuance of bonds wa s discussed. Mr. Fi tzpatrick s tated that if the tax increment district is formed this year, and the rate is frozen at the 1982 levels, increments over and above this 1982 level would be used to retire the bonds. Mr. Fitzpatrick also discussed the various bills that are before the State Legislature regarding the reassess-ment of properties. Fu rther discussion e nsued on the financial asp c t of the Urban Renewal Plan and the tax increment dis trict. Mr. Powell expressed the appreciation of th e Authority to Mr. Bell for his attendance. V. SECRETARY 'S REPORT. Ms. Po wers tated that the every other we ek . Bridg s the Engin er ar Dr y Creek ism e t ing ent ran ce t o th box conduit o recommendations hav i bing giv n to moving the channel Dry Cr ek to thee st. It is also proposed that South wid n d to a 70 foot right-of-way, and that Acoma tr Litt! VI. ESS. d that mb ra of th nd that any c nt b op n as th pond. tc., v n and School Authority pl a r d th propo or •ua at! n, thy• y hav b d Urb n ubaitt d • I • • -• • • -6- Ms. Powers stated that discussion on Little Dry Creek at the next advisory committee meeting would be regarding the matter of utilities along the right-of-way. Ms. Cole asked about the Resolution that Ms. Powers had mentioned earlier in the meeting? Ms. Powers stated that the resolution would be on the acceptance of the Urban Renewal Plan by the Authority, and the transmittal of this Plan to the City Council. Ms. Powers stated that there is no re- quirement that the Urban Renewal Authority must have a public hearing on the Plan; the City Council must have a public hearing on the Urban Renewal Plan, and the Planning Commission will have a public hearing on it. A public hearing before the Authority is at the discretion of the Authority . There being no further business to come before the Urban Renewal Authority, the meeting was adjourned at 7:15 P.M. • I • • • Present: • • • MINU TES BOARD OF DIRE C TO RS M EE TIN G DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMEN TS WEDNESDAY, MARCH 1 7 , 1982 Thomas R. Eggert, C hairman Arapahoe C ounty 5 Ted Hac kworth, Vi c e-C hairman Doris Durdy, Secretary-Treasurer Robert A. Briggs, Jr. C ity & C ounty of Denver C ity of Brighton Carl A. Winkler Vesta H. Miller Linda Jourgensen Norman A. Smith Dennis Mahagan Beth Jenkins David Busby Betty Anderson Joe Bilo Robert E. M c Gregor George Garson Mark D. Edwards Arvin H, Mic hel Norb ert Meier Mary Elle n Ke tte lkamp Peggy Shepa r d Rodney Sheffer Ken Lewis Ada ms County Douglas C ounty C ity of Arvada C ity of Boulder C ity of Broomfield Town of Castle Rock C herry H ills Vllla ge C ommerc e C ity C ity of Edgewater C ity of Englewood F e dera 1 Heights C ity of Glendale C ity of Golden C ity of Lakewood C ity of Louisvllle Cit y o f Northglenn C i t y o f Thornton C ity o f We stm inster City of Wheat Ridg e \.) Also Present : Ch irm Robert D . Farley, Executiv Director; J ck instllng r, Color do D pt. of Highw ys; Thomas B nson, D OG Attcrn y; L.A. Kimball, Regional Transportation District; ren And rson, C I kins, Kr m , Grim sh 1 & Harring; R. T. Kn ic k erbocker; Shirley Heck, Executive S cretary for t he Board and vari ous members of t h D OG staff. m Ung to ord r t 7:40 p.m., roll w I ta n nd Minutes of f ebry rv 17, 1 s2 The rd, upon m ion by M1. Jouro n n, support by Mr . 8rigqs, unanimously pprov lh Mlnu I o th rebru ry 17, 1982 B rd m tll'IIJ u 1u mitt d • I • • BOA RD M INU TES Ma rc h 17, 1982 Page two Report of Chat,rman • • • Chairman Eggert reported that appointme nt s have b e en ma d e t o the Program Committee, however, if anyone else wants to serve, they should let him know. In addition, Robert Briggs has been a p po inted t o ser v e a s a mem ber of the Transportation C ommittee and Ken Le wi s will be an alt erna te t o t hat committee . Walt To msic and Frank Wedd i g wer e appoi nted C hairma n and Vice-Chairman respectively, of the Federal Aid Ur ba n S yste ms C o mm itt e e. Mrs. Clement has been appointed t o the Library Servi ces Task Force . The May Board meeting has been rescheduled from May 19 th to Ma y 26 th because of the NARC C onference. Chairman Eggert also reported that the framed Resolu tio n pa ssed by t he Board in fanuary in Memoriam of Robert F. C lement was pre se nted to Mr s . Cleme nt at the Executive C ommittee Meeting. Amendment of Regi ona l Growth and Dev elo pment Plan Emolovrne nt a nd Pop ula tion Forecasts Mr. Hackwo rth r eported that the Program Committ recommended adoption o f the resolution to amend the Regional Growth and Development Plan for th e Denver Re g i on to revise the Year 2000 six-county employment/population forecast. Mr. Johnston, D OG staff, briefed the Board on the ar 2000 mployment/ population projections noting t hat upon revi w by the D OG Economic Planning Task Force, the Regional Planning Advtsay Committe , Chief Administrative Officers Advisory Committee, and DRCOG st ff, Sc nario IV with 1,525,000 employment and 2,513,000 population is recommended for-adoption as the Regional Growth and Development Plan Y r 2000 policy for ast. Alternatlv projections w re heard at a public he ring in Fe ru ry without comm nt. Mr. Gebhart, D OG staff, gav bri f r vi w o th basic ssumptlons nd distinguishing c h r cteristlcs th t drive th in t d sets of popul tion nd employment projection scenarios and r spond d t o questions from the Board. I • • • • • BOARD MINUTES March 17, 1982 Page three Revised Elderly and Handicapped Transportation Element Mr. Hackworth reported that the Program Committee, the Transportation Committee and Transportation Advisory Committee recom mended Board approval of the levised Elderly and Handicapped Transportation Element. Mr. Scheuernstuhl, DRCOG staff, gave a slide presentation noting the transportation services available to the elderly and handicapped popu- lation as well as the improvements in services provided by public and private transportation agencies. It was noted that the 1978 plan included the identification and study of various courses of action for improving elderly and handicapped transportation services, There is still a continuing need for specialized service and the DRCOG has encouraged the c reation of county- wide non-profit service providers. The plan includes provision of service by RTD, private, non-profit organizations and commercial companies in a coordin- ated manner. Elderly and handicapped living in rura 1 areas will be eligible for special service from the private sector and CDH, DRCOG and RTD will work cooperatively with countywide service providers to make Section 18 funds available to provide this service. Mr, Kimball, Executive Director of the Regional Transportation District responded to questions regarding current and planned bus service and equipment provided by RTD. The Board, upon motion by Mr. H ckworth, supported by Ms. Shepard, unanimously adopted Resolution No. S, 1982, A Resolution to Approve the Revised Elderly and Handicapped Element, (A signed copy of Resolution No. S is attached to and made a part of the file copy of these minutes.) Approval to Dissolve the Fire Service Advisory Committ e Mr. H ckworth report d that the Progi, m Commltt r comm nded that th Fire Service Advisory Committee be dissolved. Mr. F rley expl lned that the Fire Servic Advisory C omm i t ee w s established to d velop a training curriculum. At the present time th r ls no role for the committe and it is recomm nd d th t it b dlssolv d. The B rd, upon motion by Mr. H ckworth, support d by Mrs. Mill r, un nlmously pprov d th r c mm nd tlon to dissolve th Fir S rvic Advt ory C omm! t • I • • - • • • • BOARD MINU TES Marc h 17, 1982 Page four Library Services Task Force Recommendatio n Mr. Hackworth reported tha t the Program Comm ittee r eviewed the recommendation of the Short-Term Subcommittee of the Library Ser vic e s Ta s k Force and r ecom - mended Board adoption of the resolution enc ou rag ing a ffe cted Denv e r metropolitan area governments to communicate to the State General Assembly their intent to appropriate funds in support of the Colorad o Resourc e C e nte r . Mr. Shannon, DRC OG staff, explained the overa ll strategy proposed by the Library Services Task Force noting that the t a s k force was established by the Board to develop recommendations for sol ution of t he fi na nc ial problems of the Colorado Resource Center located at the De nver Ma in Libra ry. It is estimated that 5 5% of a ll non-Denver CRC requests for service are from walk-in s. Th i s recommenda tion addresses this group only and is designed as a short-term solution. The Joi nt Budget Committee of the Colorado Ge nera l Assembly ha s recommended a match appropriation of $288, 750 to the amend ed budget of the C olorado D epartment o f Education provided affecte d loca l gov ern - ments in the Denver metropolita n area collectively appropriate an equa 1 dollar amount of $288,750 for s u pport of the CRC i n FY 82-83. Appropr i ation of fun ds will be based on documente d 1981 use of the CRC by non -Denv er me tropolitan area residents. C lear Cree k , Douglas and Jefferson County respective target appr opria tio n s w ould be only a t the county level because each county has a cou ntywi de library syst em . Adams, Arapahoe and Boulder Count ies, which each ha v e s ome mu ni c i pal libraries as we ll a s county operations, w ould be given target appropr iations for all affected libraries within the respective counties. A memo was distributed which explained the proposed financial support for the Colorado R source Center. Mr. Eggert reported that bas d on a conversation with representative of the Department of Public Affairs, it w s felt som thing could b work d out that would allow counties to exceed the 7'K-limit tton. Mr, Shannon responded to questions of the Board r l Ung to shon-t rm a well as long-term library consid r tions by the Task Force. • I • • • • - BOARD MINUTES March 17, 1982 Page five Briefing on C riminal fustice Program Activities Mr. Shannon, DRGOG staff, reported that while there has been a reduced role in grant administration, the Criminal fustlce Planning Offic maintains nine active projects which are routinely monltrced for fiscal and programmatic p erforma nc e. In addition, technical assistance is dvailable to local govern- ments. The work of the Jail Needs Task Force represent., a significant crim- inal Justice project and the work of this task force to da e was reviewed. Administrative responsibility for the Centralized Organiza ion for Police Selec- tion (COPS) was transferred to DRGO G in Janu ry, 1982. During the first quarter of operations under DRCOG, thre public servic announcements for use on cable television have been completed and a documen arv on law enforcement careers is being prepared. Report of Executive Director Mr. Farley reported that the DRGOG Annual Dinner is March 31 at the Regency I nn. The Board Policy R treat is scheduled for June 3-5 at Beaver Run i Breckenridg . An agenda will be forwarded as soon as it is finalized. Congressman Wirth is scheduled to meet at D OG on Friday, March 19 to discuss submittal of our portion of t he Stat lmpl n dn our request to Congr s s for relief fro the currf'n Cl ,in tr Act. • I • • - • • BOARD MINUTES March 17, 1982 Page six • • • The Clean Air Task Force will meet to consider additional strategies recom - mended by the National Wildlife Federa tion for inclusion in the SIP. DRCOG staff is continuing to meet with city councils to review its programs and activities. Those whc have not s cheduled a time were urged to do so . Recent DRCOG publications and program activities during February were reviewed. A briefing on Sloa n Lake is scheduled at DRCO G on April 8 for th ose Jurisdictions in close proximity to the Lake. The calendar of policy issues was noted. Other Matters by Members Beth Jenkins, Mayor, Cherry Hills Village, reported that this was her last Board meeting as she is not running for reelection. She expressed her pleasure in having been able t o serve during the past ten years and wished the Board and the DRCOG good luck in the future. Chairman Eggert thanked her for her dedicated service and wished her well in her future endeavors. t AdJournment There b eing no further business to come before the Board, Chairman Eggert declared the meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Thomas R. Eggert, Chairman Denver R gional Council of Governments ATTEST: Rob rt D . Farley, Ex cutive Director I • • n • PRESENT: ABSENT: OTHERS PRESENT: • • • OOARD OF CAREER SERVICE CXJdMISSIC?IBRS March 18, 1982 Jo Ellen Turner, Catherine Pokraka., Janet Kerzic Ix:mald Weber Robert Brundage None . * * * * * * Chairman Weber called the meeting to order. Ccumissioner Turner rwved, secouded by Q:mnissioner Pokraka to approve the March 18 , 1982 minutes. AYES : Turner, Pokraka, Kerzic, Weber NAYS : None Coomissiooer Turner IOOVed, seconded by Ccmnissioner Kerzic to approve the minutes of the February 25, 1982 Special Hearing. AYES : 'l\.lrner, Pokraka, Kerzic, Weber NAYS : Nooe Qmnissioner Pokraka mved , secooded by Croro1ssioner Turner to approve the minutes of the Uarch 4, 1982 Special Hearing. It.em four on t t.iv pr t AYES: 'l\.lrner, Pokraka, Kerzic, Weber NAYS : Non * • * * • * the B!l>loy Asaociatioos Oloice . There DO any of tbe t associations. • * • • • • City lollulager' s Clx:>ice. r' office . • • • • • • • I • • n - • • • • -2- Item five on the agenda was the Oxlmissioners Oloice. Cba.i.nmn Weber stated that the Board had requested a written statsnent fran both the City and Police Officers John Wing and Richard Welbourne giving their approval of exceeding the 30 day tilre period for hearing their grievance. Clla.i.I1111U1 Weber requested that both Tan Holland, Assistant City Attorney and Officers Wing and Welbourne be contacted and raninded of the Board's request. • • • • • • There being no f urther business before the Board, Chainnan Weber adjourned the March 18 , 1982 regular meeting of the Career Service Board at 7:15 p.m . \. f-)-;: .. r:c:f !h . {,J ~ L . 'Ji -;-;-;_ • 7 ' - I ( (. { , ,.-' .-/ ~ ) I > < Ik>nald M. Weber , Ouu.mBn Valerie Christy, Recording Sec • I • • - • • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COM!IISSION APRIL 6, 1982 I. CALL TO ORDER. The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by Chairman Ed McBrayer. Members present: Barbre, Carson, Gilchrist, McBray er , Senti, Stoel Romans, Acting Ex-officio Member s absent: Becker, Tanguma, Allen II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Chairman Mc Brayer s tated that the Minutes of March 16, 1982, were to be considered for approval. Carson moved: Gilchrist second ed: The Minutes of March 16, 1982, be approved as written. AYES: Ca r son , Gilchrist , McBrayer, Senti, Stoel, Barbre NAYS: None ABSE NT: Becker, Tanguma , Allen The motion carried. III. COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE §22.4-10, B-1 §22.4-11, B-2 CASE 17-82 Chairman McBray r st t d that he would ent rtain a motion to op n the Public Haring on the propos dam ndm nt of th Compreh nsive Zoning Ordinanc , 122.4-10 and 122.4-11. Barbr mov d: C rson econd d: Th Public He ring on Cas J7-82 be opened. AYES: Cr on, Gilchrist, McBrayer, S nti, ~co 1, Barbr NAYS: Non ABSENT: Tan uma, All n, B ck r Th motion carri d. 5 E Mr. r aak d i mb rs of th C ission h d ny qu 1tion1 r garding th port? H th n sk d Mr1. R un1 if lh wi sh d to addr II th Co Mn. R 01 a d th t th taff r port b includ d 1 part of th r cord 0 th Public H aring. Mn. Romani eta d that th r cord 1h uld also • ) I • • • • • - -2- reflect that notice of the Public Hearing was published in the Englewood Herald Sentinel. Mr. McBrayer asked if the staff had knowledge of concerns regarding the various entertainment uses. Mrs. Romans stat e d that concern s have been expressed on uses such as the bowling alley, which does not have adequate parking for their patrons, and concerns have also been expressed on Bumpers in Cinderella City because of the excessive noise generated by this use, and the congregation of people at this establishment. Mrs. Romans stated that there have been several calls from people who have expressed interest in starting a video game business in Englewood. At the present time there are no regulations or requirement s governing this type of use, and the proposed amendment which would make these and similar uses Conditional Uses, would give the Co mmission an opportunity to look at each specific use at a specific location. Discussion ensued. Mr. Stoel pointed out that very few of the older buildings in Englewood where this t y pe of use might locate have adequat e parking areas. Mrs. Romans agreed that this is a problem. She pointed out, however, that there is a provision in the Co mprehen sive Zoning Ordinance that parking ma y b provided within 400 feet of the principal use. Mr. Tanguma entered the me e ting at 7:10 P.M. Mrs. Romans reiterated that this p roposed amendment making the entertain- ment business s Conditional Uses will provide an opportunity t o rev iew each requ s t as i t p rtain s to a particul r si te, and ton gotiate on such matters a t parkin g. Mr s . Romans s tat d that ppli ants for approval of an nt rta i nm nt busin ss would fil an applic tion, th Collllllission would hold a Public Haring on ach r qu t, and could plac condition pproval if it i so d t emin d. th r w s w y that busin that this is done, and cit d t h ich ha shared parking with a t th joint use of parkin rd d with th Co unt y . d th t the r co rd r fl ct r opposition to the propo rdi nc . Tti Pu lie H• ring on Ca 17-2 cl d. AYES: Cilchri t, H Bra r, S nti , Sto 1, T ngU11a, arr , Cr n NAYS: A.BS T: r Th Mr. atl< d d Br yr or n h t 1 h d. y di1cu Ii n h h d h ard th t 1a • n nt I • • - • • • • • -3- revisions of the Zoning Ordinance? Mrs. Romans stated that there is a sub-committee of the EDDA that is working with the staff and Mike Haviland on the specific permitted uses; however, the staff has not met with this committee for about three weeks. The staff of the Planning Division does have an appointment on April 16th with Mr. and Mrs. Haviland to review the listed permitted uses and will attempt to form a recommendation to take to the subcommittee for their consideration. This recommendation would then have to be submitted to the entire EDDA board by the sub- committee, and would then be submitted to the Planning Commission by the EDDA. Further discussion ensued. Mr. Stoel stated that he felt the recommended amendment of the Comprehen- sive Zoning Ordinance as proposed by the staff is a good recommendation, and could take care of any problems that might arise. He discussed the concerns that many people have with the "arcade" terminology, and noted that the character of the present game arcades is not something that is disreputable or something that parents should fear for their children. He also noted that most of the game arcades are accessory uses to an- other use such as a restaurant. He reiterated that there is a big push to change the image of "arcade". Further discussion ensued. Mr. Tanguma stated that he personally sees nothing wrong with the video game arcades, and noted that there is no one in attendance at the public hearing. Mr s . Romans pointed out that the proposed amendment is not prohibiting this type of operation in the City; it does give the Commission an opportunity to review each individual request at a specific site. Mr. McBrayer asked th pleasure of the Commission? Carson moved: Stoel seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that th Comprehensiv Zoning Ordinance, §22.4-10 and 12 2 .4-11 b m nd d as follows: 1. R pal 122.4-10 b (3): Any u intend d to provide amu mentor ent rtainment on payment of fe or ad- ia ion ch r 2 . Add to 122.4-10 h , Conditional Us , 112: Amus ment establishments in- cluding, but not limit d t o: billiard hall , bowling lleys, coin-op rat d games, danc halls , 1 ctronic or vid o g a , night clubs, outdoor rcial recr ational facil- pool hall• or skating Add to 122. ·11 h, C nditi nal U , 114 : Aau nt eatabliah nta in- cludin bu not liaited to: billiard halls, bowling all ya, coin-op rt d a, dan • I • • • • - -4- halls, electronic or video games, night clubs, outdoor commercial recreational fa~il- ities, pool halls or s kat ' • rinks. The staff report for Case #7-82 is included a s a part of the recommendation from the Planning Commission. Mr. Tanguma disc ussed his concerns regarding governmental regulations on private enterprise. Di scussion ensued. 1be vote on the mo tio n was called: AYES: McBrayer, Senti, Stoel, Barbre, Carson NAYS: Tanguma , Gi lchrist ABSENT: Allen, Becker The motion c arried. IV. PUBLIC FO RUM. No on e wa s pr sent to address the Commission . V. DIRECTOR 'S CHOICE. Mrs. Roma ns s tate d that Ms. Powers, Director of Co mmun i t y Developm nt, was attend i n g a dinner meeting with oth r City s ta ff and membe r s of Brady En t erprises t o d iscuss the Downtown Development Plan. Ms . Romans st ted that she und e r s t ood a tour of th town D nv r is being plann d for April 24 th by th Brady p r oject in down- Cit y Council . M. Romans t ted that the Planning Co mm ission has a tour of the public f ciliti sin Englewood chedul d for April 24th, 1 aving th City Hall at approxim t ly 8:00 A.M. and r turning at approxim t ly oon. 1b at Mr. McBray of thia br r ported that progr ss i bing mad on th reJDOd lin o( th City Shopping C nt r. Work is al o going fon. rd on th Prows- Commis ion w r e ur Comm! sion m mb r b • r sch duled for April 14th d to att nd, if po aibl c lled tor mind th m a to locat n t o occaai Cit dmini I • • r, • • • -s- a tour of the Ragsdale plant, but they have not had anyone from the City who has expressed an interest in such a tour. Mrs. Romans sta ted that this is a world-wide business, with plants in such locations as Japan and Germany. She stated that she has committed the member s of the Planning Commission to a tour of the Ragsdale Brothers plant; it will have to be on a work-day, because the plant is closed down on Saturdays. Mr. Gilchrist stated that he appreciated the fact that Mrs. Romans had indicated that the Commission members were interested in the local business operations . Mr. Ta nguma stated that he felt there were a lot of businesses in Engle- wood that were growing quite rapidly, and that it might be interesting to tour some of these businesses. Discussion ensued. Mr. McBrayer sug- gested that if Commission members had a specific business they wanted to tour, to submit this suggestion to the staff and let the staff make the contacts. He stated that he was familiar with Modern Plastics, and found their operation t o be of interest to him, and that it might also be of interest to other members of the Commission . Mrs. Romans stated that there are no specific matters on the agenda for the meeting of April 20th, and suggested that possibly this evening could be devoted to a work session on the goals of the Commission, She suggested that the landscaping provisions could also be discussed at this time. Mrs. Romans stated that a copy of an article pertaining to Aurora had been reproduced for the Commission . VI. COMMISSION 'S CHOICE. Mr. Ca rson stated that he had attended th annual banquet of the Denver Regional Council of Governments. Mr. Carson reported that Englewood received three awards that evening, and that he felt very proud to be from Englewood. He stated that he felt the City has av ry good City Council and a very good staff. Mr. McBr yr stated that he would be attending the APA Confer nee in Dalla in May, and if any member had an opportunity to rev! w th ag nda for this Conference and wanted him to attend asp cific eting to please let him know. Mr. McBr yer stated that th City Councils ta Public Haring for May 10th at 7:30 P.M. on th propos d Sign Code. He urged that many Com- mission members s possibl ttend this m ting. Mr. McBrayer sugg std that if th April 20th Commission m d d vot d to a work se sion nd consid ration of the goals of ion for th coming year , he would lik to see if perhaps amid-My ting with th City Council could b sch duled. Mrs. Romans stat d that sh would look into this possibility, but was awar that th City Council sch dul is very full. VII. Mr. McBray r ask d for C ae fS-82 , th CAS fS-82 Zoning Ordinanc was ny discussion on th Findings of Fa ct nt of th Co mpr h naiv Zoning Ordinanc , 122.4-11 h. I • • • • • -6- Tanguma moved: Carson seconded: The Planning CoDDDission accept the Findings of Fact and refer them to City Council. AYES: Senti, Stoel, Tanguma, Barbre, Carson, Gilchrist, McBrayer NAYS: None ABSENT: Allen, Becker The motion carried. Mrs. Romans discussed the revamping of the proposed Sign Code, and some of the changes that had been instituted in the proposed Sign Code since it was considered by the Planning Commission and recommended to the City Council. These minor changes in format and regulations were done at th e suggestion of the legal staff. Mrs. Romans urged the Commission members to review the Sign Code as presented to City Council at the meeting of April 5th, and to attend the Public Hearing on May 10th. The meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M. • L I • • • • • MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDIN G ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION . DATE: April 6, 1982 SUBJECT: Amendment of Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance §22.4-10, B-1, and §22 .4-11, B-2. RECOMMENDATION: Carson moved : Stoel seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, §22.4-10 and §22 .4-11 be amended as follows: 1. Repeal §22.4-10 b (3): Any use intended to provide amusement or entertainment on payment of a fee or ad- mission charge. 2 . Add to §22.4 -10 h, Co nd i tional Use , §§2: Amusement establishments in- cluding, but not limited to: billiard halls, bowl i ng alleys, coin-operate d games, dan ce halls , electronic or video games, night club s, outdoor commercial recreational facil- ities, pool halls, or skating rinks. 3. Add to §22 .4-11 h, Conditional Us , §§4: Amus ment establishm nts in- cluding but not limited to: billiard hall , bowling all ys, coin-operat d g a, d nc h lls, 1 ctronic of vid o gam a, night clubs, outd or comm rcial r er tionsl f cil- ities, pool halls or katin rinks. Th taff r port for C 17-82 is includ d ••apart of th recomm ndation from th Pl nning Commission. AYES: YS: H Br yr, S nti, Sto 1 , Barbr , C raon T gu , Gilchrist ABS T: All n, B k r Th aotion carri d. • I • • -• • • MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE: April 6, 1982 SUBJECT: Findings of Fact -Case #5-82 RECOMEMNDATION: Tanguma moved: Carson seconded: The Planning Commission accept the Findings of Fact and refer them to City Council. AYES: Senti, Stoel, Tanguma, Barbre, Carson, Gilchrist , McBrayer NAYS: None ABSENT: Allen, B cker The motion carried. By Order of the City Planning & Zoning Cormnission . ertrude G. Welty Recording Seer tary L I • • • • • • WATER AND SEWE R BOARD April 13, 1982 Regular Meeting The meeting was called to order at 5:03 p.m. 5 F Members present: Cook, Best, Haviland, Fullerton, Giseburt, Higday, Otis, Lay Members absent: Al s o pr esent: Fitzpatrick Stewart Fonda, Director of Utiliti es Bob Gower, Blatchley & Assoc. Ron Blatchley, Blatchley & Assoc. Joe Tom Wood, Blatchley & Assoc. Bill Jones, Black & Veatch Dr. Dan Lindstedt, BlacL & Veatch l . WA TER RIGH TS DISC USSION CONDUC TED BY RON BLATCHLEY AND BOB GOW ER . Bob Gower and Ron Blatchley reviewed the cases coming up this yea r involving the City of En glewood as r eviewed on Spring Term Day fo r Water Court (copy of letter attached ). They bri efly explained the mos t important case involving Englewood's request for alternate points of diversion and the group of cases involv i ng the purchase and transfer of water from SouthPar k by s ome metro politan area cities. 11. DISCUSSIO N ON MCLELL AN RESE RVOIR CONDUCT ED BY BIL L JO NES AND DR. DAN LINDSTEDT OF BLA CK AND VEATC H. Bill Jones outlined the study objecti ves of the Report on Mclellan Reservoir Water Quality: 1 . Estimate the baseline for existing quality of water. 2. Results of the proposed development on the quality of water in the future. 3. Amount of runoff water the reservoir can take before existing water quality is effected. Or. Lindstedt discussed how the existing development will effect the current levels, and reconmended that t he Ci t y r eq uire upstre am de velopment to contain storm runoff of 1" or less to preserve th existing wat r quality . • I . • • • • • Ill. CHECK VALVES AT WATER METERS. Check valves installed i n water meters to prevent backflow from the system could possibly cause excessive water pressure in hot water tanks. Stewart Fonda has started a program to replace approximately 230 check valves in the near future. The meeting was adjourned at 7:05. The next Water and Sewer Board Meeting will be held May 13, 1982, at 5 p.m. in Conference Room A. Respectfully submitted, Cathy Burrage Recording Secretary • I • • - Bowman. Geissinger. Wright b Gower Attorney s and Cowisclors at Law • • - Arthur S. Bowman James D . Geissinger Ben L.Wright,Jr. Robert D. Gower A ssociates Arthur S. Bowman.Jr. Larry M . Snyder JocBiictt L.Don Wyman S ui t e 730 · Equitable Building · 730 Seventeenth Street, Denver, Colorado 80202 · 303 · 292 · 3306 March 24, 1982 J "5'J~ 0,)·1r,},l!'\iPf::i:J, f'n Mr. Stewa r t l•'ond a Ci ·t y of l::n g l e wooc.l Uti lit ies Department 3400 South Elat i S t r eet l::n~lewo od, Co l orado 8 0 1 10 Dear Mr. F onda : II''··· . I • '/,. •• I t flAR 3 1 198 2 ': / /I uJ J.0 C :y o i [n::;'.c\"J.:.ocl Re : Status Report on New Cases and those called up on Marc h Term Day On March 2, 1982, Lhe Water Court for Wate r Di v isio n No . l hold its Sprin g Te rm Day and a number o f cases i nvolving the City of Englewood were called up on that d ocket . Th is report will cover Lhc progress , Pre -Trial dates a n d h e ar i n rr da tes sot on those cases as wull as attempt Lo inform you of n e w statemen ts o f opposition which have been filed on Englewood 's beha l f i n wat er c ases since our last report . Thu Lwo most important cases in which Englewood is involved a.re '-8456-76 which is the Englewood exchange case and 80-CW-035, tho l::n~lowood transfer case. These are e x t r emely important ca os not only from the standpoint or Englewood 's being an applicant but also in connection with tho city's obligation under the Thornton contract and the Mission Viejo contract. 8456 ties in with the Fra:GJ.Pr River 'l'ran:,;Mountain Wi4ter Decroo, as well as \ -750-7'/ in Valor Division 6. Those cases wcro originally filed to provido a coho:::..i.vo water proi;,·am and plan a.f fecting l!"ra:Gior River wat.or, naLJ.vo Platte River w..Ltor, tho Denver excha.ngos as well a t. o \illiams Fork Exchange. The purpose for the tiling of th wu. to better enable Englewood to fulfill their obli~ation the Thornton contract nd the tission Viejo contracts. The caso:,; are basically tho two k y cases involving Englewood nd it::; water rights. At the present time, we are circulating a Stipulation on Ca o. V-8'156-76 . All object.or::; ha.vo w1.thdru.wn tho r objection s ox opt for Lho Colorado Hivcr Conservancy District. und the Do:u·u o! ator • I • • • • • • Mr . Stewart Fonda -2-March 24, 1982 Corrunissioners. Basic stipulations have been arrived at and agreed to and we believe a consent decree will be submitted in this matter. Case No. 80-CW-035, as you know, is the more complicated case. Englewood has drawn numerous objections. We are in the process of finalizing a proposed Decree. Attempts will be made to nego- tiate on a one-on-one basis with the several objectors in order to obtain their withdrawals or consent to the proposed conditions on the proposed transfers. 80-CW-035 has been set for Pre-Trial on July 12, 1981, and by that time it is hoped that the number of objectors will be substantially reduced. In our opinion, this is a case or major importance. The balance of the cases which were called on the March 2nd term day were cases in which Englewood is in a defensive posture. 'l'hcsc cases generally affect Englewood from the standpoint of the cumula- tive effect of the multiple transfers and the changes which will result in the historic regimen of the river. The5e cases are pri- marily entered into from the standpoint of monitoring the type, volume and conditions of the respective transfers in order to avoid and mitigate any damage which might result to Englewood's direct fl ow, storage and underground water rights. Injury to these ri~ht s could result from changes in the historic regimen, as well as lack oi historic return flows. The necessity of participating in these matters is obvious since any case resulting in a change in histor ic river conditions will have potential detrimental effect on En~lewood's ri~hts in the future. From past experience, any propos e d chan~c in existin g river regimen or any transfer o f water rights affecting the municipal stretch of the river require s eternal v igiiance (i.e. Berry Ditch). The cases which were set on Term Day or on which some action was taken are as follo ws : Aurora: W-7936-75 W-7739-74 IV-9231 -78 W-9148-78 79-Cli271 Janitcll Transfer Park County Land &: Cattle Company Badger Basin Transfer Coil Transfer McNulty ·rransrer A stipulated motion to modify the Janitell Decree is in cir- culation. This matter was passed. Passed. A stipulated Decree is currently being circulated. Set for Pre-Trial on 1/11/82. Set for Pro-Trial on 1/11/82 . Sot tor Pro-Trlal on 1/11/82 . • I • • Mr . S ·Lewart Fonda 79-CW351 W-7595 Walker Transfer Huron -3- • • • March 24, 1982 Set for Pre-Trial on 4/14/82. A stipulated Decree is currently boini:; circulated. All of the above cases are applications for transfer of water rights from South Park to the Aurora municipal intal<es and Aurora is the applicant. Thornton: 79-CW374 79-CW3G5 79-CW376 City of Thornton 'l'L·ausfvJ: .i.u Atlau1s County City or Thornton 'l'ransI0r in Adams County City oI Thornton Transfer in Adams County Set I'or Pre-Trial Conference on 8/:Ho~. Passed to September '1'orm Day Passed to September Term Day Continued for f urt.ler huarin~ on March 15 16, 1982. :C,1n c<! our Ja,;L r<:purL, Lhcro have hc.:011 oh.1c cl 1011 s fjl o ll 1.0 Lhrou :q,pl i caL J.u11 :;; or Ll,v C.1.Ly or TllornLuu, (;asc o. olCW4'18, o1CW14!:I and 81CW451. These cases arose out of the December 1981 Water Court resumes, and your attention is referred to Mr. Blatchley's letter or February 9, 1982 relating to the necessity for entry oI state- menLs or opposition in these proceedings. Denver Water Board: ScL for a Lwo-tlay hua1·.1.11i; u11 March 30 & 31, 1982. This .1.s a companion case very similar to the case which Englewood has b1.led in Case o. 80CW35. We have monitored this case in con- ncct.1.o n with our own pending application, as well as the effect LhaL t.hc proposed t.rani..fers and exchanges may have on Englewood's will. r r.1.g ht s . HO-C -'10G 8 0-C -40'/ 8 -C'-408 Propo ed t.ransfor:::. and uxchan 'Ol:> 1.n Douglas nd Je ff rson Counties Th use ca:s ·:::. ha V<J l>cun sot l'or a coml>.1.11ucJ !'n:-'l'r .1.al on 8/ 13/8:l. ew f1.ling were mad on D nver cases 81-CW-404 and 81-CW-405 which wor nth D cembor re um nd your attention is referred to r. B at.chl y• report. of F bruary 9, 1982. • I • • • • - Mr . Stewart Fonda -4-March 24, 1982 City of Westminst er : In the December, 1981 resume, tho City or Westminster has f i led appli cation for 4 water rights involving exchanges, transfers and storage which might have an effect on Englewood's Frazier Hiver '1'rans- mountain diversion and which applications also will affect pending cases W-8456 and 80-CW-39. Objections were filed in accordance with Mr. Blatchley's report or February 9, 1982. No activity will occur on thes e cases until the latter part of 1982 or the oarly part o f 1983. Miscellaneous: 79-CW-152 80-Cii-121 Paulk application in Douglas County Paulk appli cation in Douglas County State or Colorado: 80-CIV-1!>2 80-CW-313 HO-CIV-:1:t.:t. 80-CIV-3:.!:J 80-CW-398 Wlldlifu case for sLrcam [low through mun icipal section or the river. ApplicaLion of Willows Water District lta111r-;o u,· U1·0 Lhor s applicaLions Application by the Colorado Renaissance Festival and Town of Lark pur These cases are companion cases with the Palmer Lake cases in which E n glewood has already filed ob jections . Tho cases wero passed to the September term day. P~L:-;sed LO Lile ::.cp Lcm1be1· Lur111 day. Set for Pre-Trlal 7/l:.!/82. Pas:-;cd Lu ::.epLe1111.Je1· Lerm day. My 11nd un;t.andi n1~ thaL additional un~i11oc1·.t11f~ daLa will I.le sub- mitted to Blatchlcy 's off ice for rcviuw. These cases will probably be settled on basis of a stipulated decree. Application for conditional underground water right on which application was filed as suggested in Bl tchl y's report or Februar~ 9, 1982. This report does not cover all of Englewood's pending water case but is merely intended to cover those cases which wero affoctod by tho M~rch term day in Water Court Division No. 1, and also to up- date you and the City Attorney on new c ses in which Englewood h ntorcd since my last report. • I • • n - • • • • ---.. ~ .. -1 ··-----~ Mr. Stewart Fonda -5-March 24, 1982 Please contact me if additional information is requested or is required. 'l'hank you for your cooperation. RDG:gk cc: ~ngluwoou C~Ly Attorney • I • • • • • MINUTES E GLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD April 13, 1982 5 Chairma n Bob Currie called the regular meeting of the Library Advisory Board to order at 7:32 p.m. PRESENT: ABSENT: ALSO PRESENT: Bob Currie, Jerry Valdes, Wilma Ankrum, Debbie Dix (arrived at 7:39 p.m.) Norm Kerswill, Joe Rathburn Marietta Brown, Kay Van Valkenburg, Dorothy Wheelehan Sharon Winkle, Director of Libraries Do nn a Gottberg, Recording Secretary 1 visitor Roll call was taken and a quorum declared present. Chairman Cu rrie turned the meeting over to Sharon Winkle for the Director's Report. On April S, 1982 the City Council adopted the Englewood Public Library Guide lines. These were effective immediately upon Council approval. The Library received nine (9) proposals for an automation consul tant by the pril 9, 19 2, 5:00 p.m. deadline. A committee will review the proposals and make a final decision by the end of April. Those serving on this committee are Jerry aldes, largaret Freeman, haron Winkle, Ann Trowbridge, llenri Kruse and LeiOma Koestner. There was a brief discussion on th ac eptance of "Administrative Policies and Procedures Affe ting Access o Library Resources and Services" and "Library Initiated Programs As A Resource" as adminis rative guidelines for Library Department Staff. 82-6 ~ TIO : Th t the Board accept the e administrative guide! ines as written. Moved by: orm Kerswill econded by: Joe Rathburn 10n earn d. I Wink! The go o con r n~ 1 on long -tenn solution. l.i br uthOTlZ(J lC'I ) • -term th Color do Resource d with DRCOG for fis elution. committ t 1 on ( LA) nnu I nJ hr dm1n1 trat1v ttcnd a: repres nt tive 50.00 annu l 1n titutional m now 1 o underway working wlll b held in Trowbridg b r hip in th olor do /Colo t J l,1 r· ry hr1 t ptt l t pri l I .2.1 . l.n nt on to· 1o1ood ?ubl ic bl TV onunu • I • • - • • • • -2- Chairman's Choice Mr. Currie announced the Arapahoe County Joint Board Meeting on ~tonday, April 19, 1982 will be held at Aurora Public Library at 7:30 p.m. This will include a tour of the facilities. Also on the agenda are Generic Library Cards plus an update on the DRCOG CRC funding proposal. Englewood will host the July meeting and he asked for input for topics of discussion. Mr. Currie has appointed Norm Kerswill to chair a committee for the upcoming 1983 Board budget recommendation . Debbie Dix and Marietta Brown will serve on his committee. As a point of information, Mr. Currie noted the CLA Trustee Division Spring Meeting, May 14-15, will be held at Vail, Colorado. Member's Choice Wilma Ankrum and Jerry Valdes both gave brief reviews on the DPL reception held pril 7 for Ms. Toni Bearman, Executive Director of the National Commission on Libraries and Information Science. Mr. Kerswill asked if the Library or Englewood schools ~ere contacted by Representative Bob Stephenson regarding his request for information about public school textbooks. Mr. Kerswill asked for an explanation of memberships in the Mountain Plains Library Association (MPLA), American Library Association (ALA) and Colorado Library Association (CLA). Ms. Winkle explained that the MPLA was at the regional level, ALA was at the national level and CLA was at the state level . ts. Dix passed around an article on cen orship at the school level and an article on the ALA exhibit of banned/challenged materials. Mr. Currie passed around a letter received at the Library complimenting our Reference Librarian Et hel Altenbach. There was a brief discussion on the comments from the Suggestion Book for ~larch. Ms. Winkle commented briefly on the Statistical Report in that total circulation was up slightly and the r fcrence questions have increased greatly. 82-7 ~: To approve the finutes from the Mar c h 9, 1982 Meeting as written . Moved by: Jo Rathburn Seconded by : Jerry V ldc Motion carried. ct1ng dJourncd t :45 p.a. 4-14 d& I • • - TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJE CT: • • • sh MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor Eugene L. Oti s and Members of City Council Lou is Parkinso n, Municipal Judg~ April 27, 1982 MUNICIPAL COURT ACTIVITY REPORT FOR MARCH, 1982 Attached is the Municipal Court Activity Repo rt for March , 1982. The report is being transmitted to keep you f urther informed of Court activity and requires no action by City Council. /b Att. I • • - • • • - Mll"1CTPAL COII RT ~cJ1V1 _ 'tl>nu --Pf VHl l'E SOURC_[ _______ M.\~Cli MA~CH 1982 1Q3 1 Violations Rureau Fi nes-----------------$ 5,724.00 Park iM Vi ol a Ions Fines----------------, 6,031.85 Cour CasPs------------------···-·-·----~13, 1%.00 Cour Costs ---···--·-····----···--:-----5 4,345.00 Hitne,s Fees--------------····----------~ 90.00 Jury ree ,-------------------------------s 25.00 Bo nJ rorfelturcs--------------------·---S JOO.OD o, 1vcr l mp ro•ement Sch ool rees----------5 180.00 /\pp a l Bond rees ------------------------5 -0- Ar,pahoe Cou~ty (OU! 's )-----------------$ ~ TOTAL~ 530 ,520.85 ~~R~ I GN "'[NTS-------·----·-··· -··· --·--· - Gu i lty oleas, (incl. nolo plPas)--- •10• Gull ty pl•••------------------- ~ont 'd., failed to Appear, 01'.,,-·- TPAfFIC VIOL ATI ON~ O'J PEAU (no parki ng)-- r,uil ty pleas---·······--··-·····--· No r.,1 lty plea s ----·--······--··-· TRIALS SCHEDULED FOR ~O'IT H----·--···--·· Trials to the Cour (held)--------· Jury trials (held)···--····------·· Jurtu col la;,s•d····--------·--·--- Jury p,.._trtals--···-----····---·---···· Ct>01rt Pr -trt 1h·····--·---··----·------ ~pecl,l •••1 rl11'l s------------------------ r "' c o·e y dl·p~s I 10 n (P .B. )·----- C1~·s tlo• e1 y ef . Pros,/Sent nee ----- l?.!l. 1si 128 ,1 330 207 1'3 11. {li) 73 (24) 4 ( l) 3 2 112 111 24~ 16 20 6 7 4,248.00 7 ,10q .13 10 ,802.50 3.~?7.00 160.00 25 .no -0- 255 .00 -0- ~ 27 , 11)4 .53 320 150 ne A2 ill Jr 4 67 258 (~) 237 (23) 21 ( I) 20 20 235 ,. ll1 5 30 54 I ,427 1,4?5 4\1 4l8 I, Ill 1,161 4 15 62 SJ 1• I~ ll ~ .. •1i1 > 1,7 1 I, 716 • rori\Ls TOTAL S rnn YFM LAST YE M ------ 1/,0,14.50 15,207.40 l P,6Sg,35 21 ,q!8.63 40 ,340 .00 33,4 ?3.50 1? .n~4 .no 11, 1n?. ,1 3?5.00 ?3n ~1 75.00 100 .nn 1,460.00 40 0,M 765 .00 a1n.nn -0--0 2,397.50 _2,__,24 1 :....'O 91,080.85 R6,J27 0~ !_,0.'!_5_ ~',6 32~ 261 91i 514 4 11 l,n65 4°5 "l 2£') 911 67 1 23 2 1~5 (£) 178 (65 ) .L'.l ~5) 17 ( 2) 15 I\ P?7 2 6 6~ 'I 0 211 I, i11 3,~6~ 116 I 6 JO ~ _jl ,!17 65£ 67 64 6 "' .11, (~ ) , I • • -• • • r --.,.-----------------------------------------, I I I I I • C O U N C I L C O M M U N I C A T I O N DATE April 27, 1982 AGENDA ITEM /,, L SUBJECT Findings of Fact -Case #7-82 INITIATED BY City Planning & Zoning CommiaRion ACT I ON PROPOSED The City Council accept the Findings of Fact on Case #7-82 as adopted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The Englewood Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, f22.4-10b(3), §22.4-10hff2, and §22.4-llhff4, which proposed amendments relate to amusement establishments, and the designation of those businesses as Conditional Uses in the B-1 and B-2 Busines Zone Districts. The Public Hearing was held on April 6, 1982, and no opposition was expressed to the proposed amendments at the Hearing before the Plannin Co i sion. The Findings of Fact relating to the proposed amendments of the Compr hensiv Zoning Ordinance were prepared by the staff, and considered by members of th Planning Com- mission at their meeting of April 20, 1982. It was the decision of the Co .. is ion that th se Findings of Fact be accepted and referred to the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: That the Findings of Fact on Case 17 -82, the amendment of th Compr h nsiv Zoning Ordinan ce , be approv d and referred to th City Council. • I • • • • • • • MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING CCltMISSION. DATE: SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION: Carson moved: Stoel seconded: April 20, 1982 Findings of Fact on Aaendaent of Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, Case #7-82 The Findings of Fact on Case 17-82, the aaendaent of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, be approved and referred to the City Council. The motion carried. By Order of the City Planning and Zoning Coaaiaaion. • I • • • • • - CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO IN THE MATTER OF CASE NO. 7-82, FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS RELATING TO THE REPEAL OF §22.4-10 b(3) AND TO AMENDMENTS TO §22.4-10 AND §22.4-11 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1963, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO; WHICH AMENDMENTS RELATE TO AMUSE- MENT ESTABLISHMENTS AND ESTAB- LISHING THOSE BUSINESSES AS CONDITIONAL USES IN THE B-1 AND B-2 BUSINESS ZONE DISTRICTS. A Public Hearing was held on April 6, 1982, in connection with Case #7-82 in the City Council Chambers in the Englewood City Hall. The following members of the City Planning and Zoning Commission were present: Mr. Barbre, Mr. Carson, Mr. Gilchrist, llr. McBrayer, Mr. Senti, Mr. Stoel, and Mr. Tanguma. The following members were absent: Mr. Allen and Mrs. Becker. FINDINGS OF FACT Upon review of the evidence taken in the form of testimony, presentations, r ports and filed documents, the City Planning and Zoning Commission mak s the following Findings of Fact. 1. That proper notice of the Public Hearing was given. 2. Th t upon the recomm ndation of the City Planning and Zoning Comaiaaion, the City Council adopt d a Comprehensive Plan for th City of Engl wood by Resolution No. 49, Series of 1979, on D cemb r 3, 1979, and that 113 Englewood citiz ns, prop rty owners, and buainess p ople particfpat din the d v lopm nt of that Comprehensive Plan. ). Th tin approving the C011preh nsiv Plan, th City Council dopt d c rtain Goal for th City which w r developed by the Compr h n- iv Plan vi w Coanitte s, which Goala affirm th desire of the citizens of Engl wood aa tho Goala p rtain to th ar aa zon d for busin as us : To ncourage and support th vitality and th existing variety of atabliah d bu.in sses; To provide the climate for attracting n w business, thus incre sing our tax base; To up rad .. rginal ua sand tor plac or r habilitate d teriorating structuraa; • I • • - • • • • • -2- To create a balance of co11111ercial use s , and in the c om - mercial corridors to reflect the character of the ne igh- borhood in which the corridor is located; To improve the visual aspects of businesses both in the Central Business District and along the commercial s tri p s , and to this end, giving attention to sign control, land- scaping of parking lots and public areas, and other amenities; To encourage major redevelopment and a variety of uses by providing more flexibility through amendment s to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map. This would necessitate adjusting the types of uses permitted in specific loca- tions , , • , 4. That businesses that are intended to provide amusement or e ntertainment such as, but not limited to: billiard halls, bowling alleys, coin-operated games, dance halls, electronic or video games, night clubs, outdoor c ommer c ial recreational facilities, pool halls or skat i ng rinks, are now permitted in the B-1 and B-2 Business Zone Districts, but no pro- cedure has been established by which the feasibility of a s pecific use c an be evaluated at a specific location as to its affect upon ad j acent development. 5. That by establi shing such uses as a Condit i onal Us e, e a c h a pplication for an amusement establishment can be reviewed as t o suc h matters as adequate off-street motor vehicle and bicycle parki ng, l i ght ing , the effect of no i se and the congregation of large numb e rs of pers on s on a d j acent and ad joining businesses and residential areas, 6. Th at the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinanc e provides fo r s uch sit e-s pecific con sid e ration through the process identif ied as a Condi tional Use, wh ich procedure wa s es tabli shed by Ordinanc e No. 5 , Ser ies of 1 97 8. 7, Tha t no person s appeared at the Public He a ring wh o i nd icated a desir e t o a ddress the Commission either in favor of or i n o p posit i on to the proposed ame ndm e nt s to §22.4-10 or §2 2,4-11 of the Co mpr e hensive Zoning Ordinance. CONCLUSIONS 1. That proper notice of the Public Hearing was given in c ompliance with §22.3-4 of the Comp r ehensive Zoning Ordinance. 2. That no per sons presen t wished to add ress the Coaaission in r gard to this matter • 3. That the Goals for t he long-r a nge planning for t h desired d v lopm nt of the City of Englewood, Color a d o, we r e approve d by th City Coun c il in R solution No. 49, Seri s of 1979 , up o n t he r comm nd ation of th City Planning and Zoning Comm ission and record ed in the office of the Arapaho County Clerk and Recorder • • I • • • • • • -3- 4. That Article VIII, Part II, §58 of the Home Rule Charter of the City of Englewood, Colorado, sets forth the duties of the City Planning and Zoning Commission, stating that "it shall prepare and recom- lllE!nd to the City Council, a comprehensive zoning ordinance or proposed amendments or revisions thereto, with such provisions as the Commission shall deem necessary or desirable for the promotion of the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City." S. That the following Goals of the City of Englewood as stated in the Comprehensive Plan are germane to the issue at hand: a. To encourage and support the vitality and the existing variety of established businesses; b. To provide the climate for attracting new business, thus increasing our tax base; c. To upgrade marginal uses and to replace or rehabilitate deteriorating structures; d. To create a balance of commercial uses and in the com- mercial corridors, to reflect the character of the neighborhood in which the corridor is located; e. To improve the visual aspects of businesses, both in the Central Business District and along the commercial strips. To this end, attention must be given to sign control, landscaping of parking lots and public areas, and other amenities; f. To encourage major redevelopment and a variety of uses by providing more flexibility through amendments to th Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map. This would necessitate adjusting the types of uses permitted in specific loca- tions. 6, That the Commission is of the opinion that considering businesses which provide amusement or entertainment such as, but not limited to: billiard halls, bowling alleys, coin-operated games, dance halls, lectronic or video games, night clubs , outdoor comm rcial recre- ational faciliti a, pool halls or skating rinks on a site specific basis as a Conditional Us , will further th Goals of the 1979 Compr h nsiv Plan and will car ry out th directive of the City Charter. RECOMMENDATION Th refer, it is the recommendation of the City Planning d Zoning Co is ion to th City Council, that the Comprehensive Zoning • I • • - • • • • -4- Ordinance, Ordinance No. 26, Series of 1963, as amended, be amended by repealing §22.4-10 b (3) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, which states: Any use intended to provide amusement or entertainment on pay- ment of a fee or admission charge; and by adding §22,4-10 h §12 and §22.4-11 h §§4, which amendments would permit amusemea.t establishments in- cluding, but not limited to: billiard halls, bowling alleys, coin- operated games, dance halls, electronic or video games, night clubs, outdoor co11111ercial recreational facilities, pool halls or skating rinks, as a Conditional Use in the B-1 and B-2, Business Zone Districts. Upon the vote on a motion made at the meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission on April 6, 1982. Those members voting in favor of the motion: Mr. Barbre, Mr. Carson, Mr. McBrayer, Mr. Senti and Mr. Stoel. Those members voting in in opposition to the motion: Mr. Gilchrist and Mr. Tanguma. Absent were members Allen and Becker. By Order of the City Planning and Zoning Co11111ission. • I • • - • • M E M O R A N D U M TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: • • • Dorothy Romans, Assi stant Director of P lannin g Allan F. Stan ley, Divi sion Chief Apr I I 26 , 1982 Arcades It Is the position of this department that the owner(s) of amusement centers (plnba l I arcades) shou ld come under some type of str in gent background Invest- igation procedu r e pr i or to the license to ope rate being Issued. It not oper- ated or staffed proper l y , these places can and do become the centers for crim- ina l activity . There have been severa l po l Ice prob lems arise out of these types of businesses. They often become the centers for drug connections and transactions because of the l arge amount of Juveni l e traffic. Drug dealers find It easy to meet prospective customers and conduc t business In a relatively unsupervised atmos- phere. In March, 1981, the Eng l ewood and Lakewood Po li ce Departments joint l y Invest- igated a case Involving Juven ile prostitution and sexua l assau l t on a chi I d arising out of an amusement center that was located In the 3900 block of South Broadway. (The amusement center Is no longer owned by this same sus- pect.) This case resulted In a felony conviction against th i s suspect In Jefferson County Court. A thorough background Investigation and revised ll censlng procedur may he l p p hese amusement centers from becoming centers tor criminal activity. AF S/rt • I • • - • • • • • C O U N C I L C O M M U N I C A T I O N DATE April 27, 1982 AGENDA ITEM l t) b SUBJECT Cleaning and Cement Lining of existing Water Main on S. Broadway • I NIT I A TED BY ___ s...,t.,.e..,w .... a ... rt ........ H.......,.FL.Oowo ... d.._a -... 0 .... i r,..e ... c ... t,..gr.__..g..._f....Jl""Jt.._.j .... J~i .. t ,,..· e..,s _______ _ ACTION PROPOSED __ A_w_a_r_d_B_i_d_F_o_r_C_le_a_n_in_g_a_nd_C_e_me_n_t_L_in_i_n_g_o_f_E_x_is_t_i_n_g __ _ Water Main on South Broadway INTRODUCTION : The water line in South Broadway from Belleview to Quincy is constructed of cast iron pipe. Over the years the inside of the pipe has corroded substantially, reducing the carrying capacity of the pipe. This section will have thirteen (13) openings, and is approximately 5,300 feet (one mile) in length. This transmission line is a major line which feeds property along South Broadway and the blocks adjacent. Camp, Dresser and McKee has been retained to prepare plans and specs for boring and relining the section between Belleview and Quincy. They indicate that this line can be bored out and relined to restore it to original capacity and increase flow by about 50%. FINANCIAL DETAILS: City engineers estimated the project at approximately $180,000.00. There is prese ntly $300,000.00 budgeted for a replacement and/or relining and various miscel laneous projects for the water lines. On April 21, 1982, bids were opened for the above referenced project with three (3) contractors submitting bids. Ameron Pipe Lining Division was low bidder with a bid of $153,882.50. Att- atched is a bid su111Tiary sheet for this project. RECO MMENDATION : The reco111Tiendation is to award the project to Ameron Pipe Lining Division in the amount of $153,882.50. Camp Dresser and McKee has reviewed and evaluated the bids and we concur with awarding the project to Ameron . • I • • - • • • CDM """""""'"''-""""115/$ IJlanne,s. & meneQMW>I oonSUltants April 22, 1982 Mr. Stewart Fonda Director of Utilities City of Englewood 3400 South Elati Street Englewood, CO 80110 Dear Mr. Fonda: • • • CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. WriWa Tower. Suile 1100 1eeo Sculh A/boon S~eot 0.-, c--80222 303 7511-435 1 RE: Cleaning and Canent Lining of Existing Water Mains Contract No . 1 COM 710-41-RE Subsequent to review and evaluation of the bid proposal, bid tabulation (attached) and references for this project, we recommend awarding this contract to Ameron Pipe Lining Division in the amount of $153,882.50. Please contact Charlie Vail or me if you have any questions or require additional information. Very truly yours, 1-1~ ,f' Senior Vice President WTF/COV/sl Enclosure I • • I City of Engl hlOod , Colorado Department of Utilities Engineering EstiNte RATE AHOUIIT 24.50 Sl29 ,850 2.80 Sl8,200 3 .00 $10,950 35 .00 $525 35.00 $2,800 400 St,200 1.000 u.ooo 1,500 $1,500 600 $~00 60 SS,400 200 $2,000 1,000 SI ,000 100 Sl.000 TOTAi I $180.025 I NO . la 2a 2b 2c 2d 2e 2f s. Sb 6.i 7 8 9 • • • T,buhtion of Bi ds O~ned April 21 1 1982 at 2 :00 P.11 . Project No . (COl1) _7c.:l:..:Oc.,-4-"l,..-.:..:R=.E-..;:GE=.:;AD;;-..,._~~~~~,.....,..- Clc1nfna Ind Cwcnt I 1nfng of E1fstfog Matas Contract llo . 1 0 lfd Tabulation lfdder :A.lyaond Bidder : AIieron I nterna t iorw, 1 Pf~ lining Oh. Builders Inc . DESCRI PTIOII UIIIT QTY . RATE AIIOUNT RATE AIIOUNT Cleaning and Caent llortar Unit 5,300 25 .50 $135,150 .0< 19.35 Sl02,555 .00 lining 12-fnch C.I. Pf~ Price l. F. Furn ish, Install and Raou Unft 6,500 1.50 $9,750 .()( 3 .25 S21,J25 ,00 2-fnch Taporary Serwfce Price l. F. Pf~ Furnish, Install and Raowe Unit 3,650 4 .25 Sl5,512 .50 3.50 Sl2,775.00 4-inch Service Pf~ 1nd Price l.F. Hydrants Unaetered Serw Ice Connect-Unit 15 ... 20 .00 $300 .()( 35 .00 $525.00 tons Price Mete red Se rwfce Connections Unft 80 ... 5.00 $400 .()( 30.00 $2,400.00 Price Repa fr or Replace Curb Stop Unft 3 ... 50 .00 $150 .()( 50 .00 $1 50 .00 Y1 he and Appurten,nce Price Replace Sen,lce Line Unit 3 N . 100 .00 $300.()( ,500.00 $4 ,500 .00 Price Furnish and Install New Unit l N . ,200 .0C $1,200 .0C ,600.00 SI ,600.00 12-lnch Glte Yahe 1nd Box Price Furnish ind Install New Unit I I N . 500 .0C $500 .0C ,400 .00 SI ,400 .00 6-fnch Gile Yahe 1nd Box Price I Furnish and Install New Unft 90 12-fnch c-nt Lined Ductile Price L.F . 18 .0C $1,620 .()( 20.00 St ,800.00 Iron Pl~ Thrust Blocks Unit 10 C.Y. 50 .0C S500 . OC: 60 .00 S600 .00 Price Obstructions Unit IN . 500 .0C $500.0C ,000.00 SI ,000 .00 rrlce Polfcfn9 by Englewood, Unft 30 ... n. 100 .0( 3,000.0II 100 .00 Sl ,000.00 Colorado Pol Ice Departaent rrtce days TOTAL IID rRJCE h1 II' .HZ , 50 ~153 430 .00 • Cu,p Dresser & Mckee Inc. Enwfro,wental Engineers 1660 S . Albion St., Suite 1100 Oenwer, Colorado 80222 Bidder : Spiniello Construction C:0.pany RATE AMOUNT 20 .35 SI 07 ,855 . 00 3 .00 Sl9,500 .00 5.00 SIB,25D .OO 10.00 Sl50 .00 10.00 $800 .00 125 .00 $375 .00 200 .00 S6 00 .00 1,500.0 St ,500 .00 500 .00 $500 .00 20 .00 SI ,800.00 40 .00 $400 .00 1,000.0 SI ,000 .00 100 .00 $3,000 .00 ' \ll~ 111\ M I • - • • • • • • TO : EN<lllO)J) cm CDtN:tL REGARD]}«; RECXM£NDATI(N OF ntE PARKS AND RECREATIOO CXM1ISSirn DATE : April 13, 1982 SUBJECT : REcp:sr 'mAT FlHl:i BE MAJE AVAil.ABI.E FOR REPAIRS CN RCK\NS PARK RFSl'RCXMS RECXlHNDt\TICN : That urni.es be appropriated for the purpose of repairing deterior- ating restrocm facility '81.ls at lblms Park. By request of the Ehgle.«X>d Parks and Recreat:i.cn Coami.ssi.cn ~· ~. ~.:~Secretary • I . • I I • • • • C O U N C I L C O M M U N I C A T I O N DATE 4/28/82 AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT Romans Park Restroom Repairs INITIATED BY E. P. Romans, Director, Parks & Recreation John Lowry, Assistant Director, Finance ACT I ON p RO PO S ED_........;.A_..P..,P.;..r_ov'-a_l;.._o_f....;...lo'-w--'b'-i..;.d....;...fo_r_R_o;.;.m;.;.an.;.;,,:.s_P;..a;.;r;.;.k_R..;.e_s t.:..;r;.;o;_o;,;:•;...:.r.:.ep!;..a:.:i:.:r:..;:s ___ _ Bids were opened for Romans Park Restroom repairs in the office of the Pu~chasing Agent on March 31, 1982. Bi ds were as follow s for brick construct i on repairs : Interi or Wall s Sheer Enterpri ze $6,700 6 ,944 Repairs a re necess ary du e t o an i n f erior vent i ng sys tem wh i ch over a peri od of years has allowed moisture and rain to enter be tween 3 wall s an d r ot the i nterior wa ll s tructure. REC~ENDATION : Ac c ept low bid from Interior Wa l ls an d approve tran sfer of 7,500 from the PIF fund for repair cost s (6 ,700 + $8 00 c onti naency) • I • • 0 • ORDINANCE NO. ~~ SERIES of 1982 • • • BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 21 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ~-B=~IL=O~~~~- AN ORDINANCE CREATING PAVING DISTRICT NO. 28 IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF STREET PAVING, CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS TOGETHER WITH NECESSARY INCIDENTALS, ON CERTAIN STREETS AND AVENUE S; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS IN PAYMENT FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS; AND SETTING FORTH OTHER DETAILS IN CONNECTION WITH '!'HF DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City Council of Englewood , Colorado, pursuant to the Charter and the Municipal Code of the City, and the Laws of the State of Colorado, hereby finds and determines that there exists a necessity for the creation of Paving District No. 28, in the City, and the construction and installation th erein of street paving, curb and gutter and sidewalk improvements, together with necessary incidentals, on certain streets and avenues; and WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing concerning the creation of the District and the construction and installation of the improvements herein has been published once a week for three consecutive weeks in the Englewood Sentinel, a newspap r of general circulation in the City , and in addi ion, a notice has b en mailed, postage prepaid, to each known own r of r al property within the proposed District; and WHEREAS, at he tim and places t forth in th notice, th City Council m t 1n open s ss1on for the purpose of hearing anv ob ec ions or pro es a tha miqh b made against he proposed i r1ct or th i prov m n s to be construct d or install d; and 1, ,, , '" ' WHEREA S, t h Council has de ermin d that protests and obJec ions should b ed-; . /) /' , # I ,;' ,; t.• -1 • I • • - • ORDINANCE NO. o{~ SERIES of 1982 • • • BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 21 INT RODU CED BY COUNCIL MEMBER ~-B~I~L~O:c-~~~- AN ORDINANCE CREATING PAVING DISTRICT NO. 28 IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION AND IN STALLATION OF STREET PAVING, CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK I MPR OVE MENTS TOGETHER WITH NECESSARY INCIDENTALS, ON CERTAIN S TR EETS AND AVENUES: PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS IN PAYMEN T FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS; AND SETTING FORTH OTHER DETAILS IN CO NN ECTION WITH T HF. DISTRICT. pu rs u a n th e La ws WHEREAS, the City Counc il of Englewood , Colorado, to the Charter and the Mun i c ipal Code of the City, and o f the State of Colorado, h er eby finds and d termines t h a t th r e exists a necessity for the crea ion of P a ving District No. 28, in th e Ci t y , and the constru c t ion and 1nstalla ion therein of re t p a vi ng, curb and gutter a nd sidewal improvements, tog h r wi th n ecessary incidenta ls, on c r ain streets a nd av nus; a nd WHER EAS, Notice of a pu blic h ring concerning the er a 10n of th e Di strict and the cons rue 10n and ins allation of t e i prove ens the re in has been published once a we k for thr e cons cu 1 v weeks in the Engle wood Sen in 1, a newspap r of general circulation in the City , and in addi ion, a notice has en mailed, pos age prepaid , to each known owner of real prop rty wi hin the proposed Dis rict; and WHE EAS, at the i m and place set for h in th notice, the City Council m t in ope n session for the purpose of h ring anv objections or p r otests that migh be made agains he proposed is rict or th and improvements to be construct d or install d: ,, WHEREAS, th Coun 1 l has de rmined th t prot sts and obJ ct1on should b • I -1 • I • • - • • • • • BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1 • Creation of the District. That a special improvement dist rict for the construction, installation or im - provement of the improvements hereinafter described, is hereby created and established in accordance with the Charter and the Municipal Code of the City, and the Laws of the State of Colorado, and shall be known and designated as •paving Dist rict No. 28". All proceedings heretofore taken and adopted in connection with the District are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. Section 2. Engineering Plans and Spec ifications. That the engineer's reports, together with all of the details, specifi - cations, estimates, maps and schedules thereto attached or ap- pended, are hereby approved and adopted. Section 3. District Boundary, The extent of the District to be assessed for the cost of the improvements and the area to be i ncluded within the boundary of the District, shall be all the real property specia lly benefited, and fronting or abutt- ing on the streets and avenues between the termini described in the following Section, including the real property within one-half (1/2) block of such streets and avenues. Section 4. Description of Improvemen ts. The kind of improvements and the street s and avenues on which such improve- ments shall be constructed or installed shall be as follows: a. Necessary grading and excavation, pav ing with 6" compacted gravel base course and 2 • asphalt ic concrete surface, (except as noted at the end of the list of at r ets) concrete walks, curb and gutter where not preoently adequa e; toge th r with appurte- nances and incidentals on th follow ing streets and avenues: -2- • I • • • • • 00 FIOI 'IO S. Aca11a St. N. line Jefferson Ave. N. line Kenyon Ave. S. Aca11a St. s. line Kenyon Ave. N. line Lehigh Ave. S. Aca1la St. s. line Lehigh Ave. N. line Mansfield Ave , S. Aca11a St. s. line Mansfield Ave. N. line Nassau Ave. S. Aca11a St. s. line Nassau Ave. N. line Oxford Ave. S. Acana St, s. line Stanford Ave. N. line Tufts Ave. S. Cherokee St. s. line Yale Ave. N. line Amherst Ave. S. Cherokee St. s. line Antlerst Ave. N, line Bates Ave . s. Cherokee St. s. line Bates Ave, s. line Cornell Ave . S. Cherokee St. s. line cornell Ave. N. line Dartmouth Ave . S. Cherokee St. s. line Dartm:>uth Ave. N. line Eastman Ave. S. Cherokee St. s. line Eastman Ave. N. line Floyd Ave. S. Lincoln St. s. line Kenyon Ave. N. line Lehigh Ave. s. Lincoln St. s. line Lehigh Ave. N. line Mansfield Ave. s. Logan St. s. line Yale Ave. s. line Anilerst Ave. s. Logan St. s. line Antlerst Ave. s. line Bates Ave. s. Logan St. s. line Bates Ave. s. line Cornell Ave. s. Logan St. s. line Cornell Ave. N. 1 ine Dartnouth Ave. w. Union Ave. E. line Decatur St. w. line of Clay Street .. ') The improvements constructed on So. Logan St.r will consist of an a• compacted gravel base course and 3• asphaltic concrete surface: So. Logan Street is classified as an arterial atreet 1 and accordingly, the City will pay the difference in costs which exceed the cost for 6• base course and 2" asphalt surface, and the extra width cost. ,The improvements on &t Ul'lie ~ will also consist of an e• compacted gravel base course and 3" asph4ltic concrete surface--;-and because this portion of west Union Avenue is located in an industrial area, the a1110unt to be assessed will not exceed the costs for 6• base course and 2• asphalt surface coats. b. Necessary preparation of present surface, overlaying of same with 2-inch asphaltic concrete, and concrete walks, curbs, and gutters, where not presently adequate; together with appurtenances and other incidental work on the following streets and ave- nues: ro w. Radcliff Drive w. line of 3170, 3173 w. W. line Fed ral Blvd. W. Chenango Ave. w. Stanford Ave. w. Gr nd Ave. Radcliff or. E. line !Dwell Blvd. W. line Irving St. E. line Irving St. w. line Federal Blvd. E. line Lowell Blvd. W. lin Irving St. N cessary replacement of walks, curbs, , gutt rs where not presently adequate; togeth r with appurt - nances and other incidental work on the following atre ta and avenues: -3- I I <.., I • • - S. Acana St. W. Bellewood Dr. w. Che nango Ave. w. Gr and Ave, W. Layton Ave. W. l'b'm::>uth Ave. w. Pimlioo Ave. w. Saratoga Ave. w. Stanford .Dr. w. Tanforan Dr, w, TUfts Ave. w. union Ave. Section 5. • • • s. line Quincy Ave. E. line Irving St . E. line Federal Blvd . E. line Irvir.;i St. E. line Federal Blvd . E. line Irvir.;i St. E. line Irving St. E. line Federal Blvd. s. line Stanford Ave . E. line Federal Blvd. E. line Irvir.;i St. E. line Federal Blvd. N. line Radcliff Ave. w. line Federal Blvd. W. line Decatur St. w. line Federal Blvd . w. line Decatur St. w. line Federal Blvd . W. line Federal Blvd . W. line Dec a tur St . w. line Federal Blvd. w. line Decatur St. w. line Federal Blvd . E. line Decatur Improvements Authorized. The construc tion or installation of the street paving, curb and gutter and sidewal k improvements , together with necessary inci dentals, i n and for the District, as shown by the plans, specifications and maps the reof, approved by the City Council of the City, is hereby authorized and ordered , the material to be used in the construction of said improvements to be in accordance with such maps, plans and spe ci- f ic ations. Section 6. Assessment of Costs. The probable t ot a l cos of the improvements to be constructed or install d i s $ I i 1s proposed that the City of Englewood will pay a pprox i a ely S ; the remainder of the cost wi ll be assess d aqains h prop r y w1 hin th e distric and specially b ne it d bv he con ruction and install at i on of the improvements . The approx ima e share of the total cost to be assessed pr front fo o t against any lot or tract of l and fronting or ab utting o n said .., '( I f ~ t "l t't will b as 11er particularly set forth 1n h r so ~I ' ., ' {I ' (_/ -,_ e on March 8, 1982, and which is 1ncoi- specific reference. / S ct ion 7. Payment of Assessments. The as essment a will be due and payabl wi thout demand within thirty (30) days from nd aft r th final publication of th Ordinanc assessing h whol cos o[ said improvements against the real proper y i n the District. In the event any owner of real state shall -4- I I ti' ., , , Tc (",>J t, I • • • • • • fail to pay the whole of such assessment against his or her property within said thirty (30) days, then th e who l e cost of the improvements so assessed against such property shall be payable in t en ( 1 O) equal annual installments of principal. The first of such installments of principal shall be due and payable at such time as will be determined in the assessing ord in a nce and the remainder of said installments shall be due and payab le succes- sively on the same day in each year thereafter, until a ll are paid in full. The maximum rate of interest to be paid on unpaid and deferred installments shall not exceed 181 per annum, and will be established by ordinance to be adopted by the City Council at a later date. Section 8. Special Improvement Bonds. By virtue of and pursuant to said laws and the Charter and the Municipa l Code of the City , local improvement bonds of the City shall be issued for the purpose of paying for the local improvements described in this Ordinance, in an amount not to exceed the cost and expenses of said impr ovements, including engineering, legal a nd incidental expenses , as provided by l aw . The bonds shall be issued based upon estimates approved by the City Council, and as authorized by an Ordin ance to be passed by the City Council at a later date. The maximum rate of interest on sp e cial improvement bonds for Paving District No. 28, shall not exceed eighteen ( 18) per cent p r annum. The bonds and the interest thereon shall be payable out of special assessments to be levied against the real property includ ed within th e District and specially benefited by th improvements to be constructed or installed. Section 9. General B n fits. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the improv ments proposed to be con- structed and installed will confer a special benefit upon the property within the District and a general benefit upon the City as a whol • Section 10. Sev rabili y. That if any one or more s ction or parts of this Ordinance shall b adjudged unenforce- ble or invalid , uch judqm nt shall not aff ct, impair or inval- idate he r maining provisions of this Ordinance, it being th int ntion that th various provisions hereof ar severabl • -5- I • • • • • • Section 11. Hearing. In accordan ce with Section 4 0 of the City Charter, the City Council shall hold a pub l ic he a rinq on this ordinance , before final passage, at 7:30 P.M. on Monday, April 19, 1982. Section 12. Publication and Effec tiv e Da te. This Ordin ance, after its final passage, shall be numbered and reco d - ed, and the adoption and publ ication shall be authenticated by the signature of the Mayor and the Director of Finance, ex-off icio City Cl erk-Treasurer, and by the Certificate of Publication. This ordin ance shall become effect i ve thirty ( 30 I days after publ ic a - tion following f in al passage. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 5th day of April, 1982 . 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 7th day of April, Read by title and passed on final reading on the 3rd day of May, 1982. Published by title as Ordinance No .~~~' Se r ies of 1982, o n the 5th day of Ma y , 1982. Ates Eug ene L, o is , Mayor ex officio city Clerk -Treasurer I, Gary R , Higbee, ex officio Ci y Clerk-Treasurer of lh City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify hat th above and foregoing is a true , accurate and compl cop y of h Ordinance pass don final reading on the 3rd day of Ma! l982 nd publish d by itl s Ordinan ce No, , Series of 1982 1 Gary R. Higbee -6- I • • - ,'' • ORDIN ANCE NO.~ SERIE S of 1982 • • • BY AUTHORITY ~ ~ COUNCIL BILL NO. 21 "if-' INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL \\J~ MEMBER BILO I A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE CREATING PAVING DISTRICT NO. 28 IN THE CI'rY OF EN GLEWOOD, COLORADO , ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF STRF.ET PAVING , CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS TOGF.THER WITH NECESSARY INCIDENTALS, ON CERTAIN STREETS AND AVENUES: PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS IN PAYMENT FOR SAID IMPROVEMENTS: AND SETTING FORTH OTHER DETAILS IN CONNECTION WITH THE DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City Council of Englewood, Colorado, pursuant to the Charter and the Munic ipal Code of the City, and the Laws of the State of Colorado, hereby finds and determines that there exists a necessity for the creation of Paving Distr ict No. 28, in the City, and the construction and installation therein of street paving, curb and gutter and sidewalk improvements, together with necessary incidentals , on certain streets and avenues: and WHEREAS , Notice of a public hearing concerning the c reat ion of the District and the construction and installation of the improvements therein has been published once a week for three consecu iv weeks in the Engle wood Sentinel , a newspaper of qeneral circulation in the City , and in addition, a notice has heen mailed , postage prepaid, to each known owner of real property within the proposed District : and WHEREAS , at the time and place set (orth in the notice, th Ci y Council met in op n s ssion for th purpose of hearing any objections or protests that might be made against the proposed distri~t or the improvements to be constructed or in stalled; and WH EREAS , th Council has determin d that~ CERTAIN pro sts nd obj ctions should be GRANTED AND CERTAIN I MPR OVE MENTS DELETED FROM THE PROPOSED LIST OF IMPROVEMENTS, ANO THE REMAINING PROTESTS ANO OBJECTIONS OV rruled; -16 - • I • • -• • • BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADC: Section 1. Creation of th e District. That a special improveme nt district for the construction, installation or im- provement of the improvements hereinafter d e scribed, is h ere by created and established in accordance with the Charter and the Municipal Code of the City, and the Laws of the State of Colorado, and shall be known and designated as "Paving District No. 28". All proceedings heretofore taken and adopted in connection with the District are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed. Section 2. Engineering Plans and Specifications. That the engineer's reports, together with all of the details, specifi- cations, estimates, maps and schedules thereto attached or ap- pended, are hereby approved and adopted. Section 3. District Boundary. The extent of the District to b~ assessed for the cost of the improvements and the area to be included within the boundary of the Distr ict, shall be all the real property specially benefited, and fronting or abutt- ing on the streets and avenues between the termini described in the following Section, including the real property within one-half (1/2) block of such streets and avenues. Section 4. DescEi..£!ion of .!!!!£~ments. The kind of improvements and the streets and avenues on which such improve- ments shall be constructed or installed shall be as follows: a. Necessary grading and excavation, paving with 6" compacted gravel base course and 2" asphaltic concrete surface, ( except as noted at the end of the list of streets) concrete walks, curb and gutter wher not presently adequate; together with appurt nances nd incidentals on the following streets and avenu s: -17 - • I • • - • • • • CN FlOI 'IO s . Acana St. N. line Jefferson Ave. N. line Kenyon Ave. s . Accrna St. s. line Kenyon Ave. N. line Lehigh Ave. s. Accrna St. s. line Lehigh Ave. N. line Mansfield Ave. s . Acoma St . s . line Mansfield Ave. N. line Nassau Ave. s. Acana St. s. line Nassau Ave. N. line Oxford Ave. s. Acana St. s. line Stanford Ave. N. line Tufts Ave. 6. Eherel,ee 6~. 6, liAe ¥ale ,.,..e, N, liAe .~i:st A¥e, Iii. CAeilrQl<;liKI it, i, liAe AINM!E&t 1\11@, N, HAe Ba"es A..,e. 6, El=lel!el,ee St, 6, liAe Ba~es A•,e, 6. HAe €emeH Awe. 6, Eherel,ee Sta 6. liAe 6emeH A,e. H. HAe ~t!IIOlt:!th flitte. s. etiecokee St. s. Hne Be~th A,e. N, line EaslaRlaA ,\Ye, . s. Cher~e St • 6. liAe Sa5t:INIA hie, N, liAe Flaye Alie, 6. LineoiA St. s. line I1;eriyei. lwe. H. HAe Leh;_,., k1e. s 1.iROOlR St Ii, l.iAe I.AIAigR Aye, N, liAe MaASfiele .\ve, s . Logan St. s. line Yale Ave. s. line Amherst Ave. s. Logan St. s. line Ant.erst Ave. s. line Bates Ave. s. Logan St. s. line Bates Ave. s. line Cornell Ave. s . Logan St. s. line Cornell Ave. N. line Dartnouth Ave. w. Union Ave. E. line Decatur St. w. line of Clay Street The improvements constructed on So. Logan St. AND WEST UNION AVE. will consist of an B" compacted gravel base course and l.'.'._ asphaltic concrete surface;-6e, b8,aA s ·t is 1;1lass:i.f:i.ed as aR arterial street, aRe aeeeEeiR9ly, the City will pay the difference in costs which exceed the cost for 6" base course and 2" asphalt s urface, and the extra width cost. Tt:ig iA1pco11Q111QAt..\.--QA We6t YAiOA 1\Han,1tit 11ill also consist of an i" compacted grave) base cour&a and ~• aSpl:ultj,g CORCl'.81.8 SYl"filce,aRd NICilllEe tbis portiOR of Wast ~ A11aRua is located iR ilR iRdustl'.ial al'.ea, tbe amOYRt to be .ssessad will Rot axceed tbe costs for,. basa ~oui:se aRd 1• .spl:iiilt sul'.f.ce costs w. w. w. w. s. w. w. w. w. b . Necessary replacement of walks, curbs, & gutters where not presently adequate; together with appurte- nances and other incidental work on the following streets and avenues: ex FJO,I 'IO Radcliff Dr1v w. line of 3170, 3173 w. w. line Federal Blvd. Radcliff Dr • Chenango Ave. E. line Ulwell Blvd. w. line Irving St. Stanford Ave. E. line Irving St. w. line Federal Blvd. Grand Ave. E. line Ulwell Blvd. w. line Irving St. Acana St. s. line Quincy Av • N. line Radcliff Ave. Bellewood or. E. line Irving St. w. line Federal Blvd. Chenanqo Ave. E. line Federal Blvd. w. line Decatur St. Grand Av . E. line Irving St. w. line Federal Blvd. Layton Av . E. lin Fed ral Blvd. w. line Decatur St. -18 - I • • • • • • w. Monmouth Ave. E. line Irving St. w. line Federal Blvd. w. Pirnlico Ave. E. line Irving St. w. line Federal Blvd. w. Saratoga Ave. E. line Federa! Blvd. w. line Decatur St. w. Stanford Dr. s. line Stanford Ave. w. line Federal Blvd. w. Tanforan Dr. E. line Federal Blvd. w. line Decatur St. w. Tufts Ave. E. line Irving St. w. line Federal Blvd. w. Union Ave. E. line Federal Blvd. E. line Decatur Section s. ImErovements Authorized. The construction or installation of the street paving, curb and gutter and sidewalk improvements, together with necessary incidentals, in and for the District, as shown by the plans, specifications and maps thereof, approved by the City Council of the City, is hereby authorized and ordered, the material to be used in the construction of said improvements to be in accordance with such maps, plans and speci- fications . Section 6. Assessment of Costs. The probable total cost of the improvements to be constructed or iPstalled is '1'7, j () 0 ~1,031,H8, it is proposed that the City of Englewood will pay approximately $/"/.5.ooo , the remainder of the cost will be assessed against the property within the district and specially benefited by the construction and installation of the improvements. The app r o x i mate sh a re o f the total cos t to be a ss essed per fro nt foo t aga i nst an y lot or tract of land fronting or abutting on sa i d i mprovements will be a& ~•Fe paF\iawlawly ••• fewtR iA &Re ••••lw tigR pa•••d aAd adgpted QA Maweb a, 1ea~. aAd wbigb i• iAggr !38Fatea l:lerei11 la~· &paeifia ... , .... AIH FOLLOWS: I\SPIII\LT PAVING ON STREETS 36 ' WIDE (6 a nd 2) $27.10 PER FRON T FOOT PAVING OF OTHER WIDTHS SHALL BE IN PRO PORTION TO THE AB OVE ESTI - MATE . 4" THICK CURBWALK -TYPE I 4" THICK CURBWALK -TYPE II $2 1 .71 PER FRONT FOOT $2 4.96 PER FRO NT FOOT VERT I CAL CURB AND GUTTER $14. 44 PER FRONT FOOT SIDEWALK 4" WIDE $13 .7 8 PER FRONT FOOT 6" THICK CONCRETE SLAB $ 4. 34 PER SQUARE FOOT ALL ESTI MA TES EXCLUDE THE SI X PER CE NT (6\) FO R COLLEC- TION , INCIDENTALS AND INTEREST AS PROVIDED BY LAW. -19 - I • • • • • • Section 7. Payment of Assessments. The assessments will be due and payable without demand within thirty (30) days from and after the final publication of the Ordinance assessing the whole cost of said improvements against the real property in the District. In the event any owner of real estate shall fail to pay the whole of such assessment against h i s or her property within said thirty (30) days, then the whole cost of the improvements so assessed against such property shall be payable in ten ( 1 O) equal annual installments of principal. The first of such installments of principal shal 1 be due and payable at such time as will be determined in the assessing ordinance and the remainder of said installments shall be due and payable succes- sively on the same day in each year thereafter, until all are paid in full. The maximum rate of interest to be paid on unpaid and deferred installments shall not exceed 181 per annum, and will be established by ordinance to be adopted by the City Counci 1 at a la t er date. Section 8 . Special Improvemen t Bonds. By v i rtue of and pursuant to said laws and the Charter and the Municipal Code of the City, local improvement bonds of the City shall be issued for the p urpose o f paying for the local improvements described in this Ordinan c e, i n an am o unt not to exceed the cost and expenses of s aid i mpr o vements, i ncluding enginee ring, legal and i ncidental e xpense s , as pr o vided by law. The bonds shall be issued based u po n es t i ma t es a pprov e d by the City Council, and as authorized by an Or di na nce to be p a ss ed by th e City Council at a l a t e r date. The maximum rate of interest on sp cial i mpr o v ement bonds fo r Paving District No . 28 , sh a ll not e x c eed e i ghteen (1 8 ) per ce nt p r annum . 'Che bonds and the interest there on shall b payable o ut of special assessments to be levi d agai n st the real prop rty included w ithin the District and p ciall y b n f1ted by t he improvements to b constructed or 1nst 11 d . S ction 9. G n r l Ben fits. T he City Council hereby finds and dete r mines improv me nt s pr opos e d to b e con- structed and installed will confer as p ci a l b nefit upc.in t h prop rty within the District and a ge n ral ben fit upon th C ity s a whole . -20 - I • • - ,' • • • • Sect i on 10. Severability. That if any one or more sections or parts of this Ordinance shall be adjudged unenforce- able or invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or inval- idate the remaining provisions of this Ordinance, it being the i ntention that the various provisions hereof are severable. Section 11. Hearing. In accordance with Section 40 of the City Charter, the City Council shall hold a public hearing on this ordinance, before final passage, at 7:30 P.H. on Monday, April 26, 1982. Section 12. Publication and Effective Date. This Ordinance, after its final passage, shall be numbered and record- ed, and the adoption and publication shall be authenticated by the signature of the Mayor and the Director of Finance, ex-officio City Clerk-Treasurer, and by the Certificate of Publication. This ordinance shall become effective thirty ( 30) days after publica- tion following final passage. INTRODUCED, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 5th day of April, 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 7th day of April, 1982. ( S E A L Mayor ATTESTED: Director of Finance Passed on second reading, as amended, on th e 3rd day of May, 1982. Published in full as amended , on the 5th day of May, 1982 . ( S E A L May or ATTES'rED: Director of F1nanc -21 - I • • In - ' . • • • • • ORDINANCE NO, j~ SERIES OF 1982-- BY AUTHORITY 7 B COUNCIL BILL ;t'f 2 9 INTRODU CED BY COUNCIL MEMBE R HIGDAY AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING METER CUSTOMERS FROM REVERTIN G TO A FLAT RATE ACCOUNT. WHEREAS, the City desires to promote water conservation and equitable billing of water consumers; and WHEREAS, reversion from metered service to a flat rate system of billing for water use is contrary to those goals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. That Section 15-3-16(£) of the Englewood Municipal Code of 1969 be added as follows: 1~3-16: METER REQUIREMENTS (f) ONCE METERS ARE INSTALLED, NO WATER CONSUMER SHALL HAVE THE OPTION OF REVERTING FROM A METERED ACCOUNT TO A FLAT RATE ACCOUNT. Introduced, read in full. and passed on first reading on the 19th day of April, 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 21st day of April, 1982. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 3rd day of May, 1982. Published by title as Ordinance No.d .J , Serles of 198 2, on the 5th day of May, 1982. Attest: Eugene L. Otis, Mayor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer • I • • - - • • • • I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above is a true, correct, and complete copy of the Ord3 pag;ed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1982. Gary R. Higbee I • • n - • • • • • 7 C BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO . d SERIES OF 1982~~~- COUNCIL BILL 23 INTROD UCED BY COUNCILMAN BILO AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT BETW EEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO , AND THE DENVER REGIO NA L COUN CIL OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES BY THE CITY IN THE EXE CUTION OF THE DENVER REGIONAL URBAN RUNOFF PROGR AM AND FOR REIMB URSEMENT BY THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TO THE CITY OF EUG IBLE PROJE CT COSTS NOT EXCEEDING $10 ,000. WHEREAS, the Denver Regional Council of Governments has received a Nationwide Urban Runoff Program grant to conduct the Denver Regional Runoff Program; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to participate in a model imple- mentation project as part of that program in ex change for reimburse- ment by the Denver Regional Council of Governments of project costs up to $10,000; and WHEREAS, the City has contracted with Black and Veatch Consulting Engineers to perform the additional services in connec- tion with its participation in said p1an; NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO: Section 1. 'lbat City Council approves an agreement providing for a McLellan Reservoir water study that will review land use, storm water runoff, pollutants, nec essary treatment and consider alternatives, as found on Exhibit 1 consisting of 10 typewritten pages titled "Contract Agreement Between the Denver Regional Council of Governments and the City of Englewood, Colorado, for the Provision of Services by the City to the Council in the Execution of the Denver Regional Urban Runoff Program." Section 2. 'lbat City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby approves the contract between the City of Englewood and the Denver Regional Council of Governments and that the City Manager be authorized to sign said contract on behalf of the City • • I • • - 1 r • • • • 7 C BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. j ,,_ SERIES OF 1982 COUN CIL BILL 23 INTRODU CED BY COUNCILMAN BILO AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEW OOD , COLORADO, AND THE DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FOR TH E PROVISION OF SERVICES BY THE CITY IN THE EXECUTION OF THE DENVER REGIONAL URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM AND FOR REJMBURSEMENT BY THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS TO THE CITY OF ELIGIBLE PRCUECT COSTS NOT EXCEEDIN G $10,000. WHEREAS, the Denver Regional Council of Governments has r ecei v ed a Nationwide Urban Runoff Program grant to conduct the Denver Regional Runoff Program; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to participate in a model imple- men tation project as part of that program in exchange for r eimburse- ment by the Denver Regional Council of Governments o f project costs up to $10,000; and WHEREAS, the City has contracted wi th Black and Veatch Consulting Engineers to perfo rm the additional servic es in c onnec- tion with its participation in said plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF T HE CITY OF ENGLE WOO D, COL ORA DO : Section 1. 'nlat City Co uncil approv es an ag r ee ment providing for a McLellan Rese rvoir water study that will review land use, stor m water runoff, pollutants, necessary treatment and conside r alternativ es, found on Exhibit 1 consisting of 10 type w ritten pag es titled "Contr ct Agreement Between the Denver Regional Council of Governments and the City of Englewood, Colorado, for the Provision of Services by the City to th Council in the Execution of the Denver Regional Urban Runoff Program.• section 2. 'nlat City Council of the City of Englewood, Color do, her by approves the contract between th City of Englewood nd th D nv r Regional Council of Governments nd that the City Manag r be authorized to sign said contr ct on half of the City. • I • • - • • • • • Introduced, read in full. and passed on first reading on the 19th day of April, 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 21st day of April, 1982. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 3rd day of May, 1982. Published by title as Ordinance No • .d!J._, Series of 1982, o n the 5th day of May, 1982. Eugene L. Otis, Mayor Attest: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above is a true, correct. and complete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. q 1 , Series of 1982. Gary R. Higbee -2- • I • • In - • • ORDIN ANCE NO. d Lf SERIES OF 1982 • • • BY AUTH ORITY COUNCIL BILL 23 INTR ODUCED BY COUNCILMAN BILO AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , CO LORADO, AND THE DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF SERVICES BY THE CITY IN THE EXECUTION OF THE DENVER REGIONAL URBAN RUNOFF PROGRAM AND FOR REIMBURSEMENT BY THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNME NTS TO THE CITY OF EUGIBLE PROJECT COSTS NOT EXCEEDING $10,000. WHEREAS, the Denver Regional Council of Governments has received a Nationwide Urban Runoff Program grant to conduct the Denver Regional Runoff Program; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to participate in a model imple- mentation project as part of that program in exchange for reimburse- ment by the Denver Regional Council of Governments of pro~ costs up to $10,000; and WHEREAS, the City has contracted with Black and Veatch Consulting Engineers to perform the additional services in connec- tion with its participation in said plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. "nlat City Council approves an agreement providing for a McLellan Reservoir water study that will review land use, storm wa er runoff, pollutants, necessary treatment and consider alternatives, as found on Exhibit 1 consisting of 10 typewritten pages titled "Contrac Agreement Between the Denver Regional Council of Governments and th City of Englewood, Colorado, for the Provision of Services by the City to the Council in th Execution of th Denver Regional Urban Runoff Program.• Section 2. That City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby approves the contract between th City of Englewood and the Denver Regional Council of Gov rnments and that the City Manager be authorized to sign said contr ct on half of the City • • I • • n - • • • • • Introduced, read in full. and passed on first reading on the 19th day of April, 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 21st day of April, 1982. Read by title and pa$ed on final reading on the 3rd day of May, 1982. Published by title as Ordinance No.~, Series of 1982, on the 5th day of May, 1982. Attest: Eugene L. Otis, Mayor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above is a true, correct, and complete copy of the Or~e passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No 1 , Series of 1982. Gary R. Higbee -2- • I • • • • • ? D ., BY AUTHORITY / ORDINANCE NO. ,;(~ SERIES OF 1982 CO UN CIL BILL NO. 27 INTR ODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH VARIOUS CITIES OF THE CO UNTY OF ARAPAHOE AND BROWN, BORTZ AND CODDINGTON RELATING TO DENVER/ARAPAH OE COUNTIES FISCAL FLOW STUDY. WHEREAS, an analysis of income and expenditures between the cities of Arapahoe County and the County of Arapahoe with City and County of Denver is necessary in order to properly assess charges for services in inter- governmental relationships; and WHEREAS, Brown, Bortz and Coddington has the expertise and ability to c onduct such a study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COU NCIL OF T HE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An agreement titled "Professional Services Agreement City of Auro r a, Aurora, Colorado, and Brown, Bortz and Coddington, 100-82-100-020, Denver/Arapahoe Counties Fiscal Flow Study" is hereby approved. Said agreement provides that Brown, Bortz and Coddington shall provide professional servic es as a consultant to determine wha t benefits Arapahoe County residents receive from public goods and services provided by the City and County of Denver and the proportionate share of tax es that the Arapahoe Co unty residents pay. Further, whether County residents ar e adequately co mpensating Denver for library and c ultural facilities. The method of study shall invol ve initial researc h, review a reven ue and ex penditur e base, estimate key econom ic v a riables, analyze rev enues of each local j.Jrisdiction tracing ba c k appropriate portions of these revenues to residents of other j.Jrisdictions, an alyze the expenditur es of each · ris- diction, examine flo ws from one j.lrisdiction to another, and integra e results and estima e fiscal flo ws. Shopping patterns all revi wed, incomes analyzed , and local revenues, including property, tax , and use taxes, cigar tte taxes, among oth rs, shall be ex amined. Local expenditures for the j.Jrisdictions sh all be inv estigated, trarmers through intermediarles, including the State, Regional Traffiportation District, Metropolitan Sewer District, and other districts, sh all be considered. A report all mad cone ming ach factor of study. A copy of said agreem nt is attached h reto and ma rk ed Exhibit A. Section 2. Th Mayor of th City of Engle wood nd the Director of Finance, x officio City Cl rk-Treasurer, ar e he reby r vely authorized to sign and a id documen for and on half of dty Council nd th City o Englewood. • I • • n - • • • • • Introduced, read in full. and pag;;ed on first reading on the 19th day of April, 1982. 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 21st day of April, 1982. Read by title and pag;;ed on final reading on the 3rd day of May, Published by title as Ordinance No. __ --', Series of 1982, on the 5th day of May, 1982. Eugene L. Otis, Mayor Attest: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer r. Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treas.Jrer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. , Serles of 1982. Gary R. Higbee -2- - I • • n - • ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1982 • • • BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 27 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL ----- AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH VARIOUS CITIES OF THE COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE AND BROWN, BORTZ AND CODDINGTON RELATING TO DENVER/ARAPAH OE COUNTIES FISCAL FLOW sruDY. WHEREAS, an analysis of income and expenditures between the cities of Arapahoe County and the County of Arapahoe with City and County of Denver is necessary in order to properly a5Se93 charges for services in inter- governmental relationships; and WHEREAS, Brown, Bortz and Coddington has the expertise and ability to conduct such a study. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. An agreement titled "Professional Services Agreement City of Aurora, Aurora, Colorado, and Brown, Bortz and Coddington, 100-82-100-020, Denver/Arapahoe Counties Fiscal Flow Study" is hereby approved. Said agreement provides that Brown, Bortz and Coddington shall provide professional services as a consultant to determine what benefits Arapahoe County residents receive from public goods and services provided by the City and County of Denver and the proportionate share of taxes that the Arapahoe County residents pay. Further, whether County residents are adequately compensating Denver for library and cultural facilities. The method of study shall involve initial research, review a revenue and expenditure base, estimate key economic variables, analyze revenues of eac h local j.Jrisdiction tracing back appropriate portions of these revenues to residents of other j.Jrisdictions, analyze the expenditures of each j.Jrls- diction, P.Xamine flows from one jJrisdiction to another, and integrate results and estimate fiscal flows. Shopping patterns shall reviewed, inco mes analyzed, and local revenues, including property, taxes, sales and taxes, cigarette taxes, among others, shall be examined. Local e xpenditures for the j.Jrisdictions shall be investigated, transfers through intermedi ries, including the State, Regional Transportation District, Metropolitan Sewer District, and other districts, shall be considered. A report shall be made concerning each factor of study. A copy of said agr ment is attached hereto and marked as Exhibit A. Section 2. The Mayor of the City of Englewood and the Director of Finance, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer, are her by respectively authorized to sign nd id document for and on behalf of city Council and th City of Englewood • • I • • - • • • • • Introduced, read in full. and passed on first reading on the 19th day of April, 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 21st day of April, 1982. Read by title and passed on final reading on the 3rd day of May, 1982. Published by title as Ordinance No. ___ ,, Series of 1982, on the 5th day of May, 1982. Eugene L. Oti.S, Mayor Attest: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of the Ordinance passed on final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1982. Gary R. Higbee -2- • I • • - • • • • • 7 E BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1982 __ _ A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 28 INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER d d I" AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES TO PERMIT OTHER GOVERNMENTAL EN'ITI'IES TO USE THE ENGLEWOOD ANIMAL SHELTER • WHEREAS, the City of Englewood maintains an animal shelter; and WHEREAS, the City of Englewood has sufficient capacity to avail other governmental entities of the services of the shelter; and WHEREAS, by contracting with other governmental entities, the cost of operation will be reduced to the citizens of Englewood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Englewood approves the form of contract hereafter appearing and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign for and on behalf of the City Council of the City of Englewood and authorizes the City of Englewood to enter into said contract with those governmental agencies desirous of using the Animal Shelter facilities of the City of Englewood. Introduced, read in full. and passed on first reading on the 3rd day of May, 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 5th day of May, 1982. Attest: Eugen L. o Mayor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer r. Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby c rtify the above is a true, accurate nd complete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on th 3rd day of May, 1982. • a I • • • • • • • ANIMAL SHELTER AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into by and between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Englewood", and Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "User"; WTI'NESSETH WHEREAS, the City of Englewood, a municipal corporation, operates and maintains an animal shelter and disposal facilities, hereinafter referred to as "Facility"; and WHEREAS, User desires to participate in the use of said Facility. NOW, THEREFORE, rr IS AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: L That Englewood shall provide an animal shelter facility and services incident thereto~ IL Englewood, at the Facility, shall a ccept from proper officers or wardens of User dogs or cats delivered to it for car e . Englewood may refuse to accept any animal other than a dog or cat and may refuse to accept any animal for which it cannot provide proper care. IIL nie hours of operation of the Facility shall be blished by Englewood in writing for delivery of animals by proper officers or ward ns of User and shall also establish those times during which th public may claim anim The hours of operation shall be subject to change only with thirty days' written notic to U r. • I • • - • • • • r.v. All animals shall be disposed of by Englewood after the sixth day of confinement at the animal pound or on a date specified upon written notice from User on forms approved by Englewood. Disposal may be through adoption, transfer to a research agency, or cremation. V. Englewood, by City Council Resolution, shall, from time to time, establish a fee s::hedule for services rendered at the Facility. Services for which fees shall be charged include, but are not limited to, impoundment. boarding, euthanasia, and disposal. The charge for fees may be changed from time to time; however, no change in fees shall be effective until thirty (30) day.;1 written notice is given User. VL Englewood, upon written authority by User, shall write a ni mal citations for User. If Englewood animal wardens are required to appear in Court for a citation written for User, Englewood shall be reimbursed for actual hours spent in court. The charge for this time shall be based upo n animal warden's hourly compensation rate, which rate shall include salary, FI CA, Wor1tmen's Co mpensation Insuranc e, and pension. If the time spent in court results in overtim e , the rei mbu rsement shall be on the basis of 1.5 x hourly compensation rate. User shall be billed fo r a mWmum of t wo hours. Charges for time spent in court shall be reflected parately on Englewood's billing to User. vn. Englewood shall, by th thirtieth day follo wing each month, provide an accounting to User. U r shall pay those f established by Council Resolution to Engle wood within fifteen days after date of tement. Engle wood all collect for U r , f User i mposes on me mbers of th public -2- • I • • - • • • • claiming animals brought in by User and credit User's obligation to Englewood. User shall give Englewood notice in writing of said fees and shall provide Englewood with thirty (30) days' notice in writing before any fee change shall be effective. vm. '!be terms and conditions of this agreement shall be in full force and effect until thirty (30) days' written notice is given by either party to the other. After thirty (30) days of giving written notice of termination to the other party, this contract shall be terminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals on the day and year set forth below. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO a municipal corporation Attest: City Clerk USE R: Attest: -3- • I • • - • • • • BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1982 __ _ A BILL FOR COUNCIL BILL NO. 28 INTRODU~Y COUNCIL MEMBER ~<1.M! ,°,!_, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES TO PERMIT OTHER GOVERNMENTAL EN'lTI'IES TO USE THE ENGLEWOOD ANIMAL SHELTER • WHEREAS, the City of Englewood maintains an animal shelter; and WHEREAS, the City of Englewood has 9.lfficient capacity to avail other governmental entities of the services of the shelter; and WHEREAS, ~ contracting with other governmental entities, the cost of operation will be reduced to the citizens of Englewood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Section 1. 'nle City Council of the City of Englewood approves the form of contract hereafter appearing and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to sign for and on behalf of the City Council of the City of Englewood and authorizes the City of Englewood to enter into said contract with those governmental agencies desirous of using the Animal Shelter facilities of the City of Englewood. Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 3rd day of May, 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 5th day of May, 1982. Attest: Eug ne L. Otis, Mayor ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treaa.irer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, here~ certify the above is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full and passed on fimt r ading on the 3rd day of May, 1982. Gary R. Rlgbe • I • • - • • • • ANIMAL SHELTER AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into by and between the CITY OF EN GLE WOOD , COLORADO, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Engle wood ", and Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "User"; WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the City of Englewood, a municipal corporation, operates and maintains an animal shelter and disposal facilities, hereinafter referred to as "Facility"; and WHEREA S, User desires to participate in the use of said Facility. NOW, THEREF ORE, rr IS AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows: L That Englewood shall provide an animal shelter f a cility and services incident thereto. n. Englewood, at the Facility, shall accept from l)l'oper officers or wa r dens of Use r dogs or cats delivered to it fo r care. Englewood may refuse to accept any animal other than a dog or cat and may refuse to accept ny animal for which it cannot provide proper care. m. The hours of operation of the Facility shall be blished by Englewood in writing for delivery of animals by proper officers or ward ns of User and shall also establish those times during which the public may claim animals. The hours of operation shall be !lJbject to change only with thirty days' written notice to U r. • I • • • • • • • IV. All animals shall be disposed of by Englew ood after the sixth day of confinement at the animal pound or on a date specified upo n written notice from User on forms approved by Englewood. Disposal may be through adoption, transfer to a research agency, or cremation. V. Englewood, by City Council Resolution, shall. fro m time to time , establliti a fee schedule for services rendered at the Facility. Services for which fees shall be charged include, but are not limited to, impoundment, boarding , euthanasia, and disposal. The charge for f ees may be changed from time to time; however, no change in fees shall be effective until thirty (30 ) dayr;/ written notice is given User. VI. Englewood, upon written authority by User, shall write animal citations fo r User. If Englewood animal wardens are required to appear in Court fo r a citation written for User, Englewood shall be reimbursed for a ctual hours spent in court. The charge for this time shall be based upo n ani mal warden's ho urly compensation rate, whic h rate shall include salary, FIC A, Work me n's Com pensation Insurance, and pension. If the time spent in court results in overtime, the reimbursement shall be on the basis of 1.5 x hourly compensation rate. User shall be billed fo r a minimum of two hours. Charges for time spent in court shall be reflected separately on Englewood's billing to u r. vn. Englewood shall. by the thirtieth day following each month, provide an accounting to User. User shall pay those fees establlitied by Council Resolution to Englewood within fifteen days after date of statement. Englewood all collect for U r, fe U r imposes on members of th public -2- • I • • - • • • • • • claiming animals brnught in by User and credit User's obligation to Englewood. User shall give Englewood notice in writing of said fees and &!all provide Englewood with thirty (30) days' notice in writing before any fee change &1all be effective. vm. The terms and conditions of this agreement &1all be in full force and effect until thirty (30) days' written notice is given by either party to the other. After thirty (30) days of giving written notice of termination to the other party, this contract &1all be terminated. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals on the day and year set forth below. CIT'{ OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO a municipal corporation Attest: City Clerk USER: Attest: -3- • I • • • • • • BY AUTHORITY ORDIN ANCE NO. __ _ COUNCIL BILL NO, 30 INTRODUC ED Y COUNCIL SERIES OF 1982 MEMBER I C A Bll.L FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO PERMIT MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR USE AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN ~HE B-2 ZONE DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Englewood adopted a Comprehensive Plan for the City of Englewood in 1979; and WHEREAS , relevant goals established in the Comprehensive Plan include the fostering and attraction of new businesses which are appropriate to the B-2 Zone District.; and WHEREAS, the B-2 Zone District does not currently allow the use of mo r vehicle repair business but the City Planning and Zoning Com mission has determined that motor vehicle repair use can be appropriate to the B-2 Zone district as a conditional use; and WHEREAS, said conclusion of the City Planning and Zoning Commis5ion was reached after its Charter responsibility of public hearing and findings of fact which the City Council hereby adopts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLE WOOD, COLORADO: Section 1 The Englewood Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended allow motor vehicle repair uses as conditional uses therein by amending &22.4-11 h. thereof to add the followi'lg sut:section: 22.4-11 h Conditional Uses. 22.4-11 h 2 Motor Vehicle Repair businesses, not including body or fender work, dismantling or collision repair, and provided that: 1) Motor vehicles being serviced or stored while w iting to be rviced or called for are not parked on streets, alleys, public sidewalks or parking strips; 2) All work 1s rformed within an enclosed structure; 3) No materials or parts are d posited or stored on the premises outside of an enclosed structure. 4) Any area su to wh storag 1s !ICr ned from adj>ining residential dist:rlc1ts closed-face wood, block or • or all. I • • - • • • • 22.4-11 h 3 Motor Vehicle Laundry or Polishing business, which shall comply with the following conditions: 1) A minimum of three (3) parking spaces shall be provided on the site for each washing stall; 2) The site shall be paved to the specifica - tions of the Department of Enginee ring Services; 3) All w~ water shall be dis::harged into the sanitary sewer line after having been run through a sand trap; 4) All lights used to illuminate the area shall be directed away from adj:i cent residential properties. Introduced, read in full, and pas;;ed on first reading on the 3rd day of May, 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 5th day of May, 1982. Attest: Eug ene L. Otis, Mayor e x officio City Clerk-Tre asurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer o the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the abov and foregoing is a r e, ccurate, and complete copy of a Bill for an Ordinanc , introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on th 3rd day of May, 1982. Gary R. Higbe • I • • - • • • • ORDINANCE NO. __ _ SERIES OF 1982 BY AUTHORITY COUNCIL BILL NO. 30 INTRODUCEt,;,Y COUNCIL MEMBER ~,t--/ A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO PERMIT MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR USE AS A CONDTI10NAL USE IN THE B-2 ZONE DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the City of Englewood adopted a Comprehensive Plan for the City of Englewood in 1979; and WHEREAS, relevant goals established in the Comprehensive Plan include the fostering and attraction of new businesses which are appropriate to the B-2 Zone District; and WHERlAS, the B-2 Zone District does not currently allow the use of mo r vehicle repair business but the City Planning and Zoning Com mission has determined that motor vehicle repair use can be appropriate to the B-2 Zone district as a conditional use; and WHEREAS, said conclusion of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was reached after its Charter responsibility of p.iblic hearing and findings of fact which the City Council hereby adopts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOO D, COLORADO: Section 1 The Englewood Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to ~w motor vehicle repair uses as conditional uses therein by amending &22.4-11 h. thereof to add the followi"lg suaiection: 22.4-11 h Conditional Uses. 22.4-11 h 2 Motor Vehicle Repair busi1"1esses, not including body or fender work, dismantling or collision repair, and provided that: 1) Motor vehicles being rviced or stored while waiting to be rviced or called for are not parked on streets. alleys, p.Jblic sidewalks or parking ~ 2) All work is performed within an enclosed structure; 3) No materials or parts are d posited or stored on th pre r, outsid of n nclosed ructure. 4) Any area to wh eled traffic or storage ls r ned from adjlc nt or adj>ining residential d.lstricts by a clo6ed-face wood, block or brick wall. • • I • • - ... • • • • • 22.4-11 h 3 Motor Vehicle Laundry or Polishing business, which shall comply with the following conditions: 1) A minimum of three (3) parking spaces shall be provided on the site for each washing staII; 2) The site shall be paved to the specifica- tions of the Department of Engineering Services; 3) All waste wa ter shall be discharged into the sanitary sewer line after having been run th rough a sand trap; 4) All lights used to illuminate the area shall be directed a way from adjlcen residential properties. Introduced, read in full. and passed or. first rE>ading on 1 . rrl da. May , 1982. Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on e 5th day of May, 19S.t. Attest: Eugen ' ex officio City Cle K-Tre rer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Tr asurer o • e C ty o Englewood, Colorado, her by c rtify that th bov an for ') ng ccurate, and comple copy o a Bill for n Ordm r,<: , ,.. u ful:., and d on first re d!.ng on rd day of May, 1982. • I • • - • • • • • DISTRICT COURT , COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO CASE NO. 81-CV-1703, DIV. 1 BRIEF OF DEFENDANT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD 7 i• THE ODDFELLOWS BUILDING & INVESTMENT COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, vs CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, a municipal corporation of Colorado, et al Defendants. NOW COMES the City of Englewood, by and through the office of the City Attorney, Rick DeWitt, City Attorney, and submits to this Honorable Court its Brief in this matter. INTRODU CTI ON THIS MATIER comes before this Ho norable Court pursuant to a Rule 106(a) (4) Review of the Englewood City Council's actions in relation to a special improvement district c reat.ing a parking lot, walk "thru", and "c ross walk". Plaintiff's strategy in its brief is to use wh at can be termed the shotgun/machin gun approaach. The issues as presented by Plaintiff are not consistent with special improvement district law. This approach has not allowed fot a proper framing of the issues or allowed analysis consistent with the Colorado Supreme Court rulings on the issues material to the law of special improvem nt districts. This leads to a confusion and requires further analysis to get on th righ track. City h c h n to frame the issues in a manner that mesh th two. Hopefully, this pr n tion will give the Court insight with to in this ialized area of th law . 1 • I • • - • • • • srATEMENT OF FACTS The Englewood Downtown Development Authority is charged with developing improvements in the Downtown area. The Authority approached Co uncil of the City of Englewood by petition to construct improvements in the nature of a parking lot, park, walk-thru, among other improvements. (h.t. p. 298) Council chose, however, by Resolution No. 37 , Series of 1980, to create a special improvement district known as "Downtown Improvement District No. 1980-1" on its own initiative. (h.t. p. 312) Thereafter, appropriate public hearing was held and, pursuant to Ordinance No. 35, Series of 1980, (h.t. p. 320) an ordinance creating the Downtown Improvement District No. 1980-1 was adopted. In order for to construct the parking improvements and the walk-thru, it was necessary for Council to sell special assessment bonds. Resolution No. 51 , Series of 1980, gave notice of sale of said special cl$E!SSment bonds in the principal amount of $398,800. (h.t. p. 335) Thereafter, Ordinance No. 1, Series of 1981, authorizing the is:;uance of special assessment bonds was approved by the City Council, the bid awarded to Kirschner, Moore and Company of Denver, Colorado. (h.t. p. 349) 9) Thereafter, construction took place and, when the wh ole cost of construction had been ascertained, the assessment was made according to special benefits which the property in the district received by reason of construction, pursuant to Ordinance No. 71, Series of 198L (h .t. p. 386) The final improvements and a map of the general area are as shown on the attached drawing. Numerous public hearings were held by the Englewood City Council. Certain portions of the record ar especially helpful in understanding the history behind th construction und rtaken. 2 I • • - • • • • Mr. George Allen, at the meeting of July 14, 1980, gave a history of the downtown area. He related that in 1950, a group of citizens tried to establish a parking lot; however, this effort failed. (h.t. p. 49) The next effort was in 1959 when there was a system of traffic circulation that was not adopted. (h.t. p. 50) A report prepared by researchers from the University of Colorado in 1960 pointed out that Englewood's growth had dramatically slowed. The annual gain of 20% during the early 1950's had slowed to a rate of 4%-7% during the latter part of the decade. The study pointed to lack of the available parking as one of the most significant problems. (h.t. p. 50) In 1961, the core area was again studied per Mr. Allen and the report again showed the dramatic decrease in growth rate. The study of 1961 indicated that people are not fixing up their stores, they are not promoting business. They are not advertising. They are not providing public parking. (h.t. p. 51) "A maj:>r problem of downtown Englewood is a failure to adjlst its physical retail plant to the new trend in shopping based on the mobility provided and problems created by the automobile. We've got to have public parking," per Mr. Allen. (h.t. p. 51) A 1964 study further pointed ou the need for parking. (h.t. p. 52) Mr. Allen states the problem is the same today. It was not solved in the 1950's, in the 1960's nor in the 1970's. He hoped it would be resolved in his life time. At the same meeting, Mr. J. C. Maxwell. a busin m n for 32 ye rs on South Broadway, made a rather interesting and timely statement: "I've watched Englewood improv for a v ry ort tim nd terlorate for a long tim • And I gr with th aker tha outlined the declin of all th fforts in improving Englewood. Georg h wa hed i and h n a member nd a part of th effort, nd rv be n a part of th fforts 3 • I • • • • • • that have tried to improve the downtown area. And I believe for once that we have a means of doing it. I believe sin- cerely that we must tum around now and start improving our downtown area instead of j.Jst watching it grow -I mean, go." (h.t. p. 73) Mr. Glenn Lamberton, a businessman at 3466 South Acoma, stated: "I'm not in the retail business. I have an office here. I have six people who work with me, and the environment, the locality around me is very important. So rm for this proj:!ct 100%." (h.t. p. 80) Leonard Rohbohm, a long time businessman in Englewood stated, "Now why don't we stick our necks out now so we'll have busines tomorrow?" (h.t. p. 81) At the meeting of September 8, 1980, the City Council heard further discussion concerning this sut,j:!ct of creating the Downtown Improvement District and the method of asses,ment. Mr. Gordon Close, president of Downtown Business Association, stated that he: "hopes that you will really and seriously consider what's being done to help downtown businesses and trying to increase and pr-ovide a better parking situation for our merchants. It is very important that Englewood needs this type of consider ation, I would think. We do need parking. We need actually more than we 're even talking abou here. But I think we're making it more attractive for the merchants, for people to shop downtown Englewood, and I would like to encourage your consideration. "(h.t. p. 119) At the public hearing of September 14, 1981 , further public input was received cone ming benefit to th property o wners in th rea. Various property o wners who would have to pay an David Peters, although protesting an that: ment spoke. For instance, Mr. nt for Mr. and Mrs. Scott, noted "And I think the lo really in nd for th Engl wood do wn wn ar ••• And I ag th they wW. neft gr tly 4 I • • • • - because their general clientele will pull in there and park for nothing •••• • (h.t. p. 196) Mr. William M. Pendleton, prominent Englewood banker, states as follows: "I have notic e in c ertain respects a decline in the -certain of the Broadway and other business are as. I am a Board member of the EDDA as well. I have been supportive of the parking lot. I am happy to see it finished. I am pleased personally with the results, and as a counselor to businessmen in this area for many years, I know that this solves one of the problems that is a consistent complaint of people on Broadway. The tangible results of anything such as this are often not immediately noticed. But certainly as their effect becomes known over the years, I am sure that this will prove to be a worthwhile investment for those property owners bearing the a5Se$ment period." (h.t. p.245) Mr. Pendleton further stated that the tangible results of the construction of the parking lot were as follows: "Number 1., it is very diffic ult to park along Broadw a y • ••• And as we have talked to businessmen, both present and prospective businessmen on Broadway ove r the years, trying to ind uce them to come into the area, one of the things that has always been a problem with potential busines;es locating on Broadway is the parking situation. And I c an- not quantify it in numbe rs a nd names and how many times this has occurred, but I c an assure you it has been a a consideration." (h.t. pp. 245-247) Mr. Go rdon Close, President of th Engle wood Do wntown Business Assoc iation: "Parking has gen rally n a problem fo r all me rchants. I think alot of th merchants on Broad way f~el they'r restricted to th moun of c mers th y can have by the amoun of parking th t av ilable today. We kno tha t times, or in th future at le the main parking lot. which is on Acoma, mi h changed. And I think we hav to look forward to what could happen in tha r a . Alo of th m rchants h v mentioned th fact tha th y a r e having trouble g tting busin Th statistics, I think have o wn in th last -I think the ntinel r po rted in f tha busin in do wnto wn Engle wood is do wn. I think this h contributed to tha fa Alo of m r chants feel tha this is a prob1 m not only up and do wn Bro d wa y, whic h we ould ddr , bu up nd do wn Old Ha mpd n , up and do wn 5 • I • • • In respo • • • Girar d , not so much over on Acoma, not so much r e ally o n Lincoln but within the side streets oordering Broadway." t. p. 257) to a question whether the walk-thru will assist the avail- ability of parking on t:x,th the e ast and west sides o f Broadway , Mr. Close states: "A t this point in time our people feel that it will. We think that we're dealing with some senior citizens and so on in the area which can really use that area. We hope that the safety factor in downtown Englewood is not as severe as one would think. We feel t.hat by being able to park more towards the center of the block, as the parking lot is designed , walking through to the businesses would be quite a benefit to the businesses that are there now. It has also been planned as I understand, to make a walkway from the east side of the street to the west so that t:x,th sides of Broadway would benefit from this project." (h.t. p . 258) Mr. Mike Haviland, Director of the Downtown Development Authority, states: "I think there is a very direct imcremental increase in property value that one can attribute, at least in our instance, to the property that we own as a result o f the parking lot. And I think one of the arguments that's been questioned is whether or not there is some inc rease, and I think beyond our specific pro perty, jJst my own perception as a professional in urban planning and development, I think without question the proximity a nd the a c cess to that public parking that we 'r e pre senting the r e does give property value incre ase. (h. t. p. 27 0) Ms. Susan Po wers, Director of Co mmu nity Developm ent, states: "I think that any dow nto wn that doesn provid parking will fail, and that kind of basic. And any parking tha is supplied will generate more cars beca peopl will have more of an inter est in going to th t area because they will have the conv ni nee of parking . If you have more cars and more people, you will hav a vital busin community •••• "Either side of th street, I think will n fit. Th th walk way provides something else which we r ally haven't cllscl.1$ed tonight. And that is tha its -th walk way i lf is going to be aesthetically pl asing •••• Th r is nothing gre n e xc pt for th in n do wn 6 • I • • - r • • • south of it and this is going to provide -this first step of being a little bit more of a livable downtown where people might want to come and visit and shop. " ••• I think that once you get walking on either side of Broadway that they will go into stores along Hampden. They will go into stores along Girard. They're not -- most people that would come down to shop there wouldn't necessarily go to one store. I think they would stop in others. And I think they'd be provided with the benefit on both sides." (h.t. p. 272) Many others too numerous to include in this brief also spoke in favor of the need for parking and its benefits. There is no question that persons spoke against the need, benefit and virtually every other possible issue, whether relevant or not. Maj:)r study was undertaken to determine the assessment formula. A total of thirteen were considered. Mr. Lafoon.s' testimony revolved around the highest and best use of the property, noting, "I can't really say what its highest and best use is without substantially more investigation," (h.t. p. 2 32) and noting that he had not done an appraisal on the property. (h.t. p. 233) Mr. Dranfeld and Ms. Williamson, members of the Oddfello ws and auxilliary org aniza tio ns, indicated in conclusory remarks that they would not use the walk-thru o r the parking lot. AR GU MENT L INTRODUCTION TO SPEC IAL A SS ESS MEN T DIST RICTS ; THE A UTHORITY OF GOVERNING BODIES TO ESTAB LISH SPECIAL ASSESS MENT DISTRICTS, ASSESS MENT OF SPECIAL BE N EFTI'S (APP ORTIO NM ENT OF CO NSTRU CTION COST) AN D CRITE RIA FOR HEVIEW OF GOVER NING BODY ACTION. An introduction to th relatively complex ar a of 7 • 1al improv me n I • • - • • • • districts would be helpful in analyzing the case at hand. A local improvement di.strict is merely a geographical part of the City of Englewood established for the purpose of constructing some type of improvement and assessing its cost against the real property in that area. It is not a separate entity and has no independent authority from the City Council. The Colorado Constitution, Article XX, 6.g., (Colorado home rule provisions) authorizes the establishment of special assessment districts for local improvements. The people of the City of Englewood, pursuant to the home rule authority in the Constitution, adopted a Charter which, in Section 107, grants to the City "the power to construct or install local improvements of every character within designated districts within the City ••• " The City has further established appropriate ordinances (E.M.C. 1969 as amended, 12-1-1 et seq.) allowing the City to follow the State Statutes unless superseded by Charter or Ordinance provisions. Copies of the Charter, City Code, and State Statute are found in the hearing transcript at page 584. Special improvement districts revolve around the concept of benefit to the area where the improvements are constructed. "Special assessments for a public improvement are upheld upon the theory tha the burd n thereby imposed is equivalent to the special benefits inuring to th property assessed to defray the expense of such improvement. ••• The essential elemen of a local improv ment is the term implies, that it all ben fit the property on which th cost th reof is in a mann r local in its natur and which does not a ch to oth r property of a Uk character." Denver vs. Kennedy, 80 P.122 (CO 1904) a p. 123. ~ Y§ City of Fort Collins, 281 P.355 (1929), states follows: , to on it; th 8 • I • • • • • is, such benefits are in addition to those received by the community in general." at p. 357 See also, ~ V• ~, 21 P. 899, (CO. 1889) The creation of a district and the boundaries of the district are a matter of discretion on the part of the City Council. "Just where the lines should be drawn in creating a distric t, what property will be specially benefited are matters on which different minds might well disagree; but they serve to illustrate the the neces;ity for the rule so often declared that the exercise of the discretion vested in municipal authorities in the lawful discharge of the duties conferred upon them by law cannot be interfered with by the courts." Kennedy (.5upra) at p. 124. Our Supreme Court has adopted the following rule in determining benefit to each property with an assessment district. "Of c ourse, the amount of each individual ag;essment is not necessarily measured by the precise amount of 'benefit' flowing to the property owner affected. The as,essment is usually based upon the cost of the improvement, spread among the benefited property owners upon some equitable, ~yndiscriminatory basis. (See 1 Nichols, supra, Sec, 1,41 pp. 81-82; Q..rQe1. supra, Sec. 253, p. 274) The al::sence of an exact relationship between the assessment levied and the benefit received will not, however, invalidate the as;es:;ment, at least in the al::sence of fraud, mistake o r gross inj.Jstice. Englewood ~. ~ 520 P.2d 120 (CO . 197 4) at p. 123. The dete r mination of spec ial benefits a nd the corresponding assessments a r e left to the discretion of the municipal a uthorities, "a nd their a ction is conclusive on th courts unJe$ it appears such was fraudulent o r unreasonable." Orch rd Court D velopment Co. '& ~ity of Boulder, 513 P.2d 199 (CO. 1973) a p. 202. Theoretical argument by a land owner tha th ial ben fit does no equal th amoun of th ment is not s.ifficient. The pres.imption o validity of th Council d termination of cial ben fits and men is v ry strong. ~ ~pra), Denver '& Gr nspoon , 344 P.2d 679 {CO . 195 ). nie land own r m make "a suffid n a firmativ n flts to th ir pro rt1 9 • ial y, .. Y=::::.:to=n, I • • • ,· 522 P.2d 95 (CO. 1974) at p. 98. is in.5ufficient. Satter (supra). • • • Conclusory opinion unsupported by any evidence In conclusion "when the legislative body charged with the duly of apportioning improvement costs prescribed, in good faith, a formula designed to produce a reasonable approximation of as;;essment:s to benefits, the r esults obtained should not be disturbed absent fraud or unreasonableness in the apportionment process. Here, there was no allegation of fraud; and there has been no demonstration that the assessments were unreasonable." Satter '5upra) p. 99. IL THE PLAINTIFF ODDFELLOWS' PROPERTY AND THAT PR OPERTY IN THE DO WNT OWN I MPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1980-1 HAS BEEN SPECI/\LLY BENEFITED AND MAY BE ASSESSED FOR THE COST OF CONSTRUCTING SAID IMPROVEMENTS ACCORDING TO THE FORMULA CHOSEN BY THE CITY CO UNCIL. A. THE PROPERTIES LOCATED IN DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1980-1 ARE SPECI/\LLY BENEFITED BY THE CO NSTRUCTION OF THE PARKING LOT AND BY THE WALKWAY IMPROVEMENTS . It is of little benefit to this Court to repeat the rather lengthy Statement of Facts. suffice it to say that numerous studies, experts and bu.sines; persons agreed that there was a vital need for parking in the area, and that benefit would flow from the construction. The Oddfellows claimed that they had plenty of parking. The question really is not "isolated need" need of a specific property when d aling with the need for an improvement of th nature of parking. It is a broader need -the need of an area, in this case, the downtown area. The Supreme Court of North Dakota, in North m Pacific Railway Co . '!.• Grand Forks, 73 NW 2d 384 , 10 • I • • • • • • (N.D. 1955), stated, the benefit deriving from parking i mprovements most eloquently: "We have no doubt but that property in the vicinity of a parking lot derives spec ial benefit therefrom. Particularly is this true in the case of a congested business district which had its development before automobiles and trucks had become the great convenience and problem that they are today. In recent years there has been a trend toward a decentraliza- tion, evidenced by the removal of many businesses from con- gested areas to outlying districts where parking lots for customers were available. It is generally acknowledged and logically so, that the provision of parking space in the vicinity of a congested mercantile area, by making it con- veniently accessible to trade, tends to reverse this trend and thus stabilize business in the area. This is a special benefit sufficient to jJstify special as;;eg;ments." See also, Qpinion of the Jus:ices, 254 A.2d 273, (N.H. 1969); ~ Whittier :1., ~ 1 51 P.2d 5 (CA 1944); ~r Y... City of Minot, 188 N.W 7 4 5 (N.D. 1971); Patterson v. City of Bismark, 188 N.W.2d 7 34 (N.D. 1971); Sc arsdale ~ Murray, 366 N.Y.Supp.2d 792 (N.Y.1975); and Trezyniewsk.i y. ~ Milwaukee, 122 N.W.2d 725 (Wisc. 1961). Our o wn Colorado Supre me Co urt, in an off-street parking c ase, stated, "Pro bably most municipal im pro ve me nts wh en financ ed by general obligation bo nds are open to the c ritic ism that the pro posed i mprovements confer a larger benefit on the district in which the i mpro v ements a r e being installed than upon the rest of the community ... " ~. ~d 'u City and Coyncy of ~ 247 P.2d 140 (CO 1952) at p. 143. With respect to the walkway improvements, park improvements have long been approved by the Colorado Courts with respect to the benefits they provide an ar a. ,Farncomb 2,.. City and County of Denver, 171 P. 66 (CO 1918); Londoner .Y· City and County of Denv r , 119 P. 156 (CO 1911); see also , ~ '!: B ehr, 267 SE 2d 81 (S .C. 1980) 11 • I • • - • • • • B. THE PLAINTIFF ODDFELLOWS' PROPERTY IS SPECIALLY BENEmED BY TH E PARKING LOT AND WALKWAY IMPROVEMENTS. (Plaintiff's brief LD. and IV) Plaintiff's property is unequivocally benefited. Plaintiff ha s NO on-site parking -the need for parking was clearly established in the hearings. Again, City will not belabor the point. Plaintiff now uses on-street parking, claiming it does not need more parking. This reliance ignores factors completely outside its controL Parking on the street can be terminated by the municipal authorities at any time, other shopowners rely on the parking creating difficulty in finding parking, weather in the winter may prohibit parking on the street, parking meters might be installed possibly reducing difficulty in findinng parking, however, reducing shoppers in the area, the duration of parking permitted might be changed to the detriment of the Oddfellows. Werentially, Plaintiff acknowledges a need for public parking -Plaintiff uses it now. Plaintiff is arguing that there is a sufficient quantity for its use -this is Council's pre rogative. See Kennedy (.supra), p. 124. The evidence does not suppo rt Plaintiff's claim. Th e analysis of total parking needs for the district as don by the City show s e xtreme deficiency in the area of parking. (h.t. p. 497) Th assessment d a ta (h.t. p. 49 5) sho ws in the primary zone a total deficiency of 406 spaces, the secondary zone shows a deficiency of 24 spac Time and again Plaintiff uses conclusory remarks to suppo rt its f)OSitionl Clearly not accept.able,~ (.supra), and contrary to the need so eloquently expr members of th bus!n district. Plaintiff ci Gr;eeOSPPQn, (.su pra) for authodty tha Council m cor&d r existing f ciliti Gr nspoon had public wer rvice of suf c pacity and th could no th additional 11n nor 12 • "'nl re I • • • • • • is not now nor will there ever be need for additional sewer services to the plaintiff's property.• .Greenspoon '9-Jpra) p. 680. Consider Kennedy '9-Jpra) where the 14th Street viaduct in Denver was created pursuant to a special a5Se$ment district. The property owner protested that there were numerous other existing facilities. There were arguments pro and con as to benefits. •on this question there was doubtless room for discussion ••• but that does not by any means serve as criterion in determining whether their action in creating the district and assessing the cost of the viaduct to the property therein may be questioned in the courts.• Kennedy '9-Jpra) p. 124 . Time and again witnesses spoke of the need for parking. Mr. Allen discus,;ed numerous studies showing a need for parking. Plaintiff simply has not overcome the presumption of validity with respect to Council's action, Sattel: '9-tpra), .Q!De ~ ~, 532 P.2d 770 (CO. CA 1975) Plaintiff's expert Lafoon admits that 9Jbst:antially more investigation on his part was necessary before he could render an opinion. Further, he admitted that he did not hav an opinion that could be 9.lpported (h.t. p. 233). Hardly can Council consider his admittedly unsupportable opinion to rebut the need for the Oddfellows building to have additional parking. In SJmmary, it is virtually impossible to conclude, after reviewing the extensive record, that the Council of the City of Englewood has no made a ood faith d rmination of nefi of Downtown Improvem nt D!.strlct No. 1980-1 and to those individual properti therein. m. THE COST OF IMPROVEMENTS OF DOWNTOWN I MPROVEMENT DISI'RICT NO. 1980-1 MAY BE ASSESSED PURSUANT TO A FORMULA THAT INCLUDES MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS CO NTAINED IN A ZONING ORDINANCE. (Plaintiff's Brl f Argum nts LA., LB,, LO., L ., LG., nd V) 13 I • • • • • Plaintiff argues in its brief that Englewood may not use the off-street parking requirement of the City's Zoning Ordinance to establish an assessment formula . Plaintiff argues that this is the retrospective application of zoning standards which is unlawful. The rationale behind denial of retroactive application of zoning standards is that private property is taken without j.1s compensation without due process of law. The concept of special assessments turns on benefit -if there is special benefit equal to the burden then there is no taking. Pomeroy Y5§ Board of Public Water Works, 136 P. 78 (CO 1913); Greenspoon '9-Jpra). Plaintiff claims a due process violation -technically, there can be no taking because of benefit to the property. The use of zoning is an excellent manner in which to allocate evenly between the various property owners the benefit. Grand Forks '9-Jpra) required the assessing authority to consider: location, character, present use or adaptability for future use and the need for parking (at p. 353-354). The Grand Forks court specifically reycted the "front foot" asses:;ment formula. Other states have also permitted the use of zoning in determining benefit when assessing cost of improvements. City of Highland Park ~ Hines Lumber , 265 N.E.2d 408 (Ill. 1920), Howard Park Co. ~Los Angeles , 259 P.2d 977 (CA 1953), nd Jiili. ~ ~ 424 P.2d 168 (AZ . 1967). Counsel for Plaintiff has no cited any · risdiction reycting the concept in the special assessment r a. The mWmu rite blished in the ordinance is based on need -need th the pro rty for parking. If the City had not chosen the formula based on its Zoning Ordin nc , then Plaintiff would be arguing that th City w being rb tr ry and c pri.c a no-win sltuation. The irony of this situ tion ls pointed ou in Plain ' bri f, Argument V. Plaintiff claims th city h not giv n th Odd ellows consider tion for its pr nd past • (Oddf llows 14 • I • • - • • • - brief p. 16) This is tantamount to saying the City should use a "zoning" concept in establishing its reassessment formula. The formula was actually conceived after a property owner who had sufficient on-street parking claimed no benefit. Further, he claimed hardship and penalty because of the parking spaces he had provided at his cost. (h.t. pp. 83 -86) Frankly, the formula is uniquely suited to show benefit. It takes into account that criteria necessary to establish uniformity and benefit. Council directed staff to study assessment alternatives -they totaled 13. Council chose an alternative that meets the criteria established by the supreme Court. Hildreth (.supra); Kennedy (.supra) Finally, Oddfellows claims the City has not properly applied its Zoning Ordinance. The point of Plaintiff seems to be that it should only provide the parking spaces required by one of its uses not the sum of its uses. (Plaintiff has two tenants in addition to itself in the building.) This is contrary to the off-street parking provisions of the ordinance. The Ordinance states: "Mixed uses -In the case of mixed uses, the total shall be the sum of th requirements of the various uses. (h.t. p. 558) This is what the City did do! It should be pointed out that the City did not adopt verbatim its Zoning Ordinance its assessment criteria. Therefore, Plaintiff's argument may be moot. IV . THE ASSESSMENT FORMULA USED BY THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD EQUALLY DISTRIBUTES BENEm TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS BENEFITED. (Plaintiff's bri f LC., LE., IlI, IV) The City has used a formula which satisfies the criteria of an equality in assessing the cost of improvements according to a benefit theory. Plaintiff attacks the method of ment as a violation of equal protectio n cla o f th United States and Colorado Constitutions. The establlshmen of a m ximum m nt is j.Jstified under three theories of law. First, the special nefits do not exceed $40,000. Th second theory is tha the City is 15 • I • • • • • - authorized to make improvements under the police power of municipalities and its contribution of $161,000 and the EDDA share of $96,000 is to pay for those general benefits associated with the public at large. The third theory is well supported in Colorado law that the City, in assessing the improvements, need only have a reasonable approximation of a benefit. Plaintiff does not contest that the City has uniformly applied the formula. It is contesting the effect of the formula. Plaintiff does contest the breakdown between the primary and the secondary zone. This has been resolved by the Supreme Court of Colorado contrary to Plaintiff's position. See, Denver y, Kennedy (s.Jpra). There is uniformity with respect to application. All restaurants have been treated the same. All retail offices have been treated the same. All halls have been treated the same. See Standard Use For Calculating Required And Existing Number Of Parking Spaces In The Downtown Improvement District For Parking Lot and Walk -thru Improvements (h.t. p. 483 487). According to the law of Colorado, it is the obligation of the City to pay for those benefits that are general benefits to the co mmunity. In the case before the Court, the City has determined that special benefits do not exceed $40,000 with respect to any property. The City of Englewood may only cl$eSS those benefits to the district that are of a special nature. E.M.C. 12-1-8; C.R.S.'73 (amended 1977) 31-25-513; and Hildreth lll;i.Lonqmont 105 P. 107 (CO. 1909) What Plaintiff is essentially saying is that special benefits exceed $40,000. I would think this to be a dangerous position for Plaintiff to put forth for it should be known that the other properties would not be reevaluated should Plaintiff be successful on this is;ue. Only Plaintiffs and one other property would be increased and said payment would go to the City as a result of its contribution with respect to general benefits. Some states hav established maximum ments, See 14 McQuillin Municl.pa). Corporatio~. Sec. 38.14. 16 • I • • - • • • • • Colorado has no maximum amount. The Supreme Court has never required municipalities to assess properties in such a manner to ensure that the ag;essment is exactly equal with respect to the benefit to each property. Kennedy, (supra); Hildreth ~ Lonqmont,(supra); and Satter .I§ Littleton , (supra). Plaintiff's position that it is benefited more or less than $40,000 is unsupported by any evidence that is competent to set aside the decision of City Council. Satter (supra); ~(supra). Only conclusory remarks of Mr. Lafoon, who, admitted that substantially more study was necessary before he could testify as to highest or best use and admitted that he had not done an appraisal on the Oddfellows property, can hardly be considered more than conclusory evidence. As previously stated "the assessment is usually based upon the cost of the improvement spread among the benefited property owners upon some equitable, nondiscriminatory basis.• Englewood:§. _w__ pra). The~ '5upra) case also appli to Plaintiffs' arguments that it is not benefited as much as those properti on the HIit. COl.a1Cil the boundaries Mathematical exactn no required. rd '9,lpra), ~ '9,lpra). Several wi ficiaries would be the properties on Broadway (h.t. p.p. t. p. 1 4 For Plaintiff to say in conclusory rema only tha i pro rty no benefited to the degree that the property on the s!d o Br way · unsupported by the evid nee. SUMMARY Plaintiff questions Englewood City Council decision to create a ial improv ment di.strict nd its boundaries. This is clearly within the prerogative of Council. Plaintiff h no wn that Council actio are fraudulent, 17 • I • • In • • • • mistaken, grossly unj.lst or unreasonable. The assessment formula adopts the parking concepts embodied in the zoning regulations of the City of Englewood. Use of this criteria is the only rational method to assess parking lot construction costs based on benefit. Plaintiff has no parking off street -100% of Plaintiff's parking is on public property. Plaintiff says it needs no more parking. This position is contrary to the position of numerous business people in the downtown area who expressed a need for the parking and, in fact, stated a need for even more parking than that provided 'r,y the current district. The Zoning Ordinance takes into account differences in uses; Plaintiff has asked this Court to consider its use of the premises. Plaintiff asks this Court to take into account future uses. Council did so do and considered benefit to the "property", current use and potential future use. Wha t more can be asked? Numerous cases have adopted land use c riteria for assessment of benefits. If this were an irrational practice, would any court adopt such a policy? -NO! Plaintiff ignores every other property owner save one. It conteSt:s an assessment that is higher than its as being an unreasonable assessment. This attack is · ed and shows a lack of understanding with respect to s pecial-<,Jen ral ben fit. Plaintiff's attack mi.sseS the point -there is ial nefit; since th re is special ben fit. there can be no taking. Plaint.if pro rty has n nefited through th construction of th off-str parking. Study r study showed this need. Busin man r busin m n ed a r al need for parking. Why? -to get people in the downtown; to th t them in a position wh re th y can buy go , war th y C n Plain th r or r mply do · so th y can visit doctors, lawy rs; r tion, o n and forth. no want to pay for th rty. I 18 • I • • - • • • • will benefit in the form of an increase in the value of its property. It's like money in the bank. Plaintiff is currently satisfied with the interest it is receiving and can bank an increase in principal. I am SJre through the hist:Dry of mankind that there were those who scoffed at every step of progress --fire , the wheel, creation of the first great legal systems, steel, Rome, the United States Constitution, the airplane, penicillin. l\ccording to the principles of special improvement district law, Plaintiff has no SJpportable claim. CQNCI PSJQN WHEREFORE, Defendant City of Englewood requests an Order of this Honorable Court as follows: 1. Finding that the actions of Council in establishing an assessment formula based on zoning requirements is not a retroactive application of the Zoning Ordinance. Rather, it is a proper method to assess construction costs based on benefit. 2.. That studies in the 1950's, 1960's, and 1970's and business person after business person stated a need for parking in the downtown area; that City staff at the direction of City Council considered 13 different methods of assessment and Council chose a method tha reasonably assessed cost of construction to n fit derived. 3. Tha busin property owners who have adequate parking would be penalized by ny method that did not take into account adequate parking on each si e. 4. That the adoption of a maximum ment Is a result of the weighing o f ial ben fit and general benefit; furth r, that Council may, und r its police power, provid parking in the down wn and contribute funds to th 19 • I • • - • • • • • proj!ct. 5. That the record reveals that the conclusory statements of Plaintiff and Plaintiff's experts are not 9.lpported in fact and are directly contradicted by the statements of Mr. Allen, Mr. Maxwell, Mr. Close, Mr. Pendleton, among others, with respect to benefit derived from the parking lot, walk-thru and cross walk. 6. That City Council found that there was a need for parking in the downtown area and that this need is 9.lpported in the record. 7. That the Council has properly created and assessed the improvments authorized in Downtown Improvement District No. 1980-1. 8. That the complaint of Plaintiff Oddfellows is dismil:sed as are all other pending claims against the City. 9. That the Answer and Cross Claims of Defendant Jerry Lee Feather are dismil:sed, Council having ample authority and having properly created Downtown Improvement District No. 1980-1 by virtue of the Colorado Constitution, Home Rule Charter, City Ordinances and State Statutes, C.R.S. 1973, as amended, 31-25-101 et seq. Provisions of C.R.S. 1973, 31-25-801 e seq. are inapplicable to downtown development authorities. 10. That the decisions of th Englewood City Council are affirmed • 20 .__....._..___~---~-~-~--------_!· I • • - • • • • • CERTIFICATE OF MAILING I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have this 22nd day of April. 1982 mailed a true copy of the foregoing Brief of Defendant City of Englewood by depositing the same in the United States mails, postage prepaid, addressed to the following: J. J. Petrock, Esq. Broadhurst & Petrock 1630 Welt.on Street, Suite 200, Denver, CO 80202 James E Heiser, Esq. Assistant County Attorney 5334 S. Prince Street, Littleton, CO 80166 Richard L. Banta, Jr.,Esq. 333 W. Hampden, 1900, Englewood, CO 80110 John E. Hayes, Esq. 3333 s. Bannock, Suite 600, Englewood, CO 80110 Donald L. Dill. Esq. 650 S. Cherry St., Suite 230, Denver, CO 80222 Alan H. Bucholtz, Esq. 621 -17th Street, Suite 1776, Denver, CO 80293 S. Morris Lubow, Esq. 1600 Broadway, Suite 470, Denver, CO 80202 James C. Ruh, Esq. 1675 Broadway, 12600, Denver, CO 80202 William o. Lamm, Esq. 81 8 17th Street, 1818, Denver, CO 80202 c. Charles Bu chler, Esq. 3580 s. Lincoln, Englewood, CO 8 0110 21 • I • • I -• • • L J .. .. "~ ... AVI W EST FLOYD ..U:t .. . • . ,., ~·-1 City of ENGLEWOOD --~ ..... --·Ill ... @ W(ST GIRA'lO ..,~ I t .... I .•. ~w~, I :c ... 1 <l>•d ~ '.: i ·-.;;·t ... ~ o,'z. ...J .. 1, , 1 -··ou ·;1• WE S.T . · .. ~':-.. u,,' :-::.:! t •. ..,·: :·. ~1 F·······., \),~-.• _ r----~--, f ~ ::j -'.;-1 .., ~ --.();11) ., 9 ... -}ti (/ '" ' \$1 '• " ...... ,..,,, ·· ... ''' ,,.'-,. ' . ', .... , . ~· ., .... 111t ~ ---------, I., ... _·-: ' ' •1u1 -----·-, ·-·-' I &j r • • I :1 ., ,:l !""-~~!.: . .•: -------( ~ '-~~-------: "s : ... .. : ::~~~,"'~ --~-f;~~~) : .......... ! ' ·, I ,,_,, ,u, .Jl , : . _·· _--··1 ! • • • :c ... ~ ·I I I I •' I ~ i: ~ -~:l. ... :... 3 ,-...... ~, 0 1®·-·· c.> -:.:-:::-r., 5 i '" • ... . °'b ,~ . ... . ..... ~ - -.. •.!!'-~.'!a.,\:·.:::-::.:.~ 'f_:_ :...---~ -~ :::-_-_-_-_-_----~ ,..,..,. u .' . •;;, .. ;·!~ i~~-.::·· zi . r · ~'IIM--~ 01: '!~3!..~~ :::.:_-:._;I~.:_;_~'----1 • .. . .. -I r ... PARKING LOT -:: 285 r ----,, ! ---,o ·, .------1 -------IM I •ti 11 .. •'IAII , 1------1 1------, - • • • • 7 H City of Englewood TO: Rick DeWitt, City Attorney FROM: Gary Mandarich, Civil Engineer DATE: April 28, 1982 a.<>O S. Elatl Street Englewood , Colorado 80110 Phone (303) 761-1 UO RE : Sewer Easement between West Vassar Avenue and West Hillside ..Avenue along the west side of Lot 31. In order to serve customers along Hillside Avenue, a sewer main must be installed. The most cost effective way to install this sewer main is to follow the ground terrain, and therefore, extending the sewer main along a property line mid-block to the existing sewer in West Vassar Avenue . The City has obtained an easement from Lot 32. Attached is an easement from the property owners of Lot 31 for the ins tallation of a sewer and storm sewer line. Please review and if acceptable, present to City Council for approval. Gary Mandarich Civil Engineer GM:cb cc: Files • I • • • • • GJtANT OF UTILITY AND STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1a THIS CUNT of a utility and~at ra drainage ea•e-nt (this "Grant") e thia day of _.I , 19..i:2:._ by Ui.d dtzA.' · ("Grantor") whose ad - dre•• 1• · .' · • c t:i~o • C'.: --,J ;jl.... in f avor of Ibe ("Grantee") vhoae addreaa ia Street FngJewood, CoJorado iOllO flle partiea cOYenant and agree as !ollows: 1. !aawnt ?roperty, The "!aaeaent Property" shall mean the real property located in the County of Arapahoe, State of Colorado, more par- ticularly described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, and aubatantially aa depicted on Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which real property is owned by Grantor. 2 . Consideration, Aa conaideration for this Grant, Grantee ah a ll pay to Grantor the aua of one Dollar ($1.00) and other good and val uable considerations paid by the Grantee, receipt of which is hereby a cknowledged by the Grantor , 3. Grant of Utility and Stora Draina&e Faaeaent. Granto r hereby 1ranta to Grantee, ita aucceaaora and aaaiana, a perpetual, none xclusive eaa-nt (the "Utility Faae-nt") over , under, aero•• and throu1h t he Faa ... nt Property for the purpose o f c onatruc tinl, operatinl, .. 1ntain ing, repairi n1, replacin1, r-,v1na and enl ar11n1 the "Unea and Appurt e nances", aa herei nafter defined, flle "Linea and Appurtenance•" shall ... n one or acre atora water and aewer pipel ine• a nd al l neceaaary under1round and aur fac e appu rtenances theret o nec e s sary or de sirable f or t he t ranaaiaaion of atoravater a nd wa stewater , includ ing , but not limited to, .. 1na, con- duit•, vaults, manholes , or other facilities as required. 4. Access. Gr4nte shall have the perpetual, nonexclusive right of ingreaa and egrea• in, to, over, throu1h and across the Easement Propert y for any purpose neceaaary or deairable for the full enjoyment of the r ight s granted to Grantee under this Grant. 5, Restora tion, Grantee agrees that after the construction, main- tena nce, repair, replaceaent, or enlarg~nt of any of the Lines and Appurtenance s, Grantee shall restore the surface of the Faae-nt Property aa n early aa reaaona bly po s sible to the gra de and condition it waa in iaaedia tely prior to sai d construction, .. 1ntenance, repair, replacement, or enla r a .. ant, e xcept a a aay be neceaaa ry to accoaaodate the Linea and Appurtenances . Grantee aareea to reatore and repair any iaprove-nta of Grantor on the Faa ... nt Property which are daaaged, modified or alt rd by Gr a ntee during said conatruction, aaintenance, repair, replacement or enlera ... nt. Gr antee further aareea to replace any topsoil reaov d frOIII any cultivated or lands c a ped areaa on the Eaa .. ent Property and to re110v any exce•• earth reaultin1 froa said construction, aaintenance, repair, r~placetsent or enlara nt, at Grant e'• aole coat and expense • • I • • - • • • • • 6. No Igro,r-ta. Grantor covenant• and agrees not to construct, erect, place or plan any "Iaprovaaenta", aa hereinafter defined, on the !aaeaent Property without obtaining the prior written conaent of Grantee. "Iaprovaaenta" ahall aean any atructure or building. Grantee shall have the right to r-.e, without any liability to Grantor, any iaproveaenu conatructed, erected, placed or planted on tha laa-nt Property without Grant••'• haTiDI obtained the prior written consent of Grantor. 7, Subjac-t an4 Lateral Suuort, Gran tor covenanu and agrees that Grantee •hall have the riaht of aubjacant arut lateral aupport on the Ease- aent Property to whatever extent ia nacaaaary or deeirable for the full, coapleta an4 undiaturbed anjo:,aant of the rights granted to Grantee under thi• Grant. 8. lli&ht• of Grantor. Grantor reaerves the full right to the un- diaturbed owaerehip, uaa, an4 occupancy of tha Eaa-nt Property insofar aa aai4 ownarehip, uaa and occupancy i• conaiatent with and does not im- pair the ri&ht• 1ranted to 1rantee in thi• Grant. 9, Aband~t. In tha avant that Grantee ahall abandon the rights 1rantad to it under thi• Grant, all right, title an4 intereat hereunder of Grant•• ahall ceua an4 terainata, md Grantor ahall hold the la•-nt Property, aa tha ...... y than ba, free froa the right• of Grantee so aban4oned and •hall own all .. tarial• an4 atructura• of Grantee ao abandoned, pro,,i4ed that Grantee ahall have a raaaonabla period of tiaa after aaid abandonaant in which to reaova any or all Liau an4 Appurtanancaa froa tha !aaaaent Property, In tha avant that laaaaent is abandoned by Grantee, Grantor •hall have tha r11ht, at ita aola option, to require Grantee to raao,,a or aautraliaa any illprOY.aenta constructed in th• laaeaeat by Grantee. 10, Varraty of Title. Grantor warranu and rapraaanta that Grantor 1a tha faa aiapla owner of tha laaaaent Property and that Grantor baa full riaht, title and authority, and that thia Grant la affective to grant and convey to Grantaa tha Utility an4 Stora Drainaaa !aaaaent. Grantor further covananta and qreu to 1n4-ify, dafand an4 hold Grantaa haral.••• froa and apinat ay advaraa claia to the tit!a of tha laa ... at Property by all an4 every pareon or paraona lawfully claiaina or to claia the whole or any part thereof. 11. lin4ina lffact. Thia Grant •hall axtand to and be binding upon tha hair•, peraonal rapreeantativaa, auccaaaor• and aaaiana of tha reapective partia• harato. Tha taraa, co,,anant•, aara ... nta and condition• in this Grant ahall be conatruad aa cOYananta runnin& with tha land • • I • • - • • • • • IN WITMESS WR!IZOF, the parties hereto have executed this Grant of Utility and Stora Drainage Eaaeaent the day and year first above written. Attest: GIAMTE!: CITY OP ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO By _______________ _ Eugene L. Otis Mayor Title: Gary ll. Hiabee Title: Director of Finance, ex-officio City Clerk-Tre .. urer • I • • - STAT! OF COLORADO ) ) .. COUNTY or AIAPAHO!) Witneaa ay hand and official Hal. My Coaai••ion •xpire•: i,,y ~'1hi1!:,.: m:, ,~1.r:h:s l\c;:u~1 ~. 1~:·>· STAT! or COLOIADO ) ) .. coUlffT or AIAPAJIO! J • • • ?be foreaoina inatnaent vu acknovl•da•d before -thh ----- day of • 19 __ by ---------------,-------------.. ----------------- and ette•ted to by------------------------- .. -------------------of ----------- Witn••• ay hand and official seal. Notary Public My Coaai••ion expire•: • I • • ... - • • • • EXHIBIT 'A' A SIX-FOOT NINE INCH UTILITIES EASEMENT FOR SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS, DESCRIBED AS: The West six-foot nine inches of Lot 31, except the north 25 feet, Block 12, Southlawn Gardens, Arapahoe County, State ~f Colorado • I . • • I --z -w.m>i .. " -- SC ALE 1 •50' PROPOSED INLET BOXES PROPOSED MH A-2 2+ 67.62 9 8 7 - 6 I 25' 25· I W, HILLSIDE AVE. 25' ' 1 5~ - E D 25 1 1-z w ::I ~ w;;; "' < ~ w ...J C IC o w -~~ w . rt) UI 2 ~ IC • O N I-I') "' ~ 0 .. ...J • C Z 0 <-(I)!:: • .. , 38'-8 ENGLEWOOO SAN. SEWER CURB WALK ,J - 21 1 -12" DENVER SAN. SEY/ER 17'-6" WATER 30 214. 76 PROPOSED 12 11 STORM !;EWER LINE 31 PROPOSED 8" SEWER :.~.7-- 32 2 14.68 2 5' ~ .... .J '1 I I I I I I l • • • 25 ' ) 20'.4" 2 11 GAS VC&O TO DRAINAGE SWALE DDl"\ll'! Hl. ~.~'°:,.~SEO Ill~ 0+ 00 i... UTILITY EASEMENT EXHIBIT 'B' W. VASSER AVE. • I l • • • • C O U N C I L C O M M U N I C A T I O N DATE AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT April 27 , 1982 20-AID TO OTHER AGENCIES -198 2 I NITIATED BY -~C_i_ty:........M_a_n_a~g~e_r~-'-"--~~~~~~~----~~-~~~~- ACT I ON p ROPO SED,_--=.F..::o..::r..;,;m:..::a..::l~m:..::o..::t..::i..::o..;.;nc......:::o..::fc......:::C..::o..::u:..::n..::c..::i..::l~t..::o~d..::i;.::s_.p..::e~n;.::s..::e;......:f:.:ucc.n:..:d:..:s;._:a:..:s'---- allocated under Aid to Other Agencies , City Council Budget, Ba c kground / Ev er y year City Council authorizes financial assistance to variou s non - profit agencie s for servic es provided to the community. At your budg e t retreat last year and at subsequent meetings you allocated these fund s a s follows: .Inter -Faith Ta s k Force Arapahoe House Communit y Arts Symphony League of Women Voters Holiday Parade Jaycees St. Pa tric k's Da y Parade $11,500 7 ,000 3,500 7 00 2,000 1,7 00 1 00 one of these f und s, with the exception of th e S t . Patr ic k 's Day Parade, have been expended. Current Status U ually, these funds are formally allocated and approved by Council at one of your regular Council mee t i n gs early in the year. For ome rea on, this was not done this year and the fu nds canno t be given to these gencies un til a formal motion is a pproved. Recommendatio n Recommendation that Cou n cil app r ove a mo t ion lloc ting t he following fund : Listed o n Page 2 • I • • • • • • • Page 2 Inter-Faith Task Force Arapahoe House Community Arts Symphony League of Women Voters Total $11,500 7,000 3,500 700 $22,700 The remaining allocationsshould wait until they have been formally requested by the appropriate agencies. Total amount available under Aid to Other Agencies in Council's 1982 budget is $25,000. • I • • • • - C O U N C I L COMMU~~CAT I ON DATE April 28, 1982 AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT ~b INITIATED BY City Manager Six-Quarter Budget~ April, 1982 through September, 1983 ACTION PROPOSED Consideration in adopting a Resolution of the Six-Quarter Budge t Apr i l, 1982 through Seotember, 1983 • BACK GR OU ND Th e Publ ic Improvement Fund (PIF) Six-Quarter Budget process was adopted i n t he summer of 19 73. The essence of the Six-Quarter Budget is that the City has a co ntinu i ng budget which extends one-and-one-half years into the future. Ev ery quarter, the City Council reviews and analyzes this budget, and if pro- j ec ts are delayed due to unavoidable circumstances, they are dropped back in th i s budget, wh i le projects ready to go are moved forward. The most current revenue f orecasts are used and, if add i t i onal funds become available, spec i - f ic pr oj ects co ul d be moved forward and completed ahead of schedule or a new or eme rg en cy proj ec t could be added . 1982 CHANGES Downto wn Drainage and Traffic Improvements wa s r educ e d by $30 ,000 i n the 2nd quarter to fund the EDDA Walk-Thru on the west side of the 3400 block of South Broadway. Traffic Improvements was increased by $35,000 in the 2nd quarter to replace funds tha w re taken out in December, 1981 to balance the PIF fund. These funds will be used to purchase four additional traffic controllers in 1982. Street and Sidewal District (PD 128) was increased by $60,000 in the 2nd quart e r to pay for engineering, legal advertising, rentals , etc. that are no longer to be assessed to the property owners in paving districts pe r City Co uncil. Road nd Brfd ~ which fs the City's annual street over lay a nd chip seal progra , w s incr ased by $74,000 in the 2nd quar t er, fr om $300,700 to $374,700. T se unds ar vaflable due to increased high way user tax r efund s proj e cted in 1981 or 1982 and wil l b used to overlay four streets in the Centenn ial Acres ar at at re re ved from PO 28 due to prior Council's commitment to main- ain t o e str s a no cost to the property own rs • • I • • - • • • • -2- Romans Park Restroom Repairs~ is a new project to repair the structural wooden walls of the restroom that are deteriorated. Belleview Park Pumphouse ~ is a new project to replace the existing irrigation pumphouse and install three pumps that irrigate the park from the water filter plant backwash pond. The $50,000 added in the 2nd quarter will be supplemented by $35,000 presently in the Parks and Recreation Department budget, making the total project $85,000. Centennial Park project was the improvements around the lake~ the waterfall, the jogging trail, etc. We have now included the Hall property purchase under this project. The $50,500 in the 2nd quarter is for the land purchase. Belleview Storm Repair project constructed the new flow channel in Bellev i ew Park. In 1981, $4,500 was taken to balance the PIF fund . In the 2nd quarte r, those funds are being re-appropriated for erosion control. Methane Gas Conversion project to purchase a scrubber unit to clean the met ha ne gas produced by the sewage treatment plant is no longer being considered . The rema i ning $142,000 av ai lable to th i s pro j ect i s be i ng returned to the PI F fund for disbursement to the other above-ment i oned pro j ects . 1983 ADDITION S Road and Br i dge project for annual overlay and sealcoats on streets i s be i ng funded in the amount of $281,034 i n the 3rd quarter in accordance with the 198 2 budget five-year plan . Si dewalk Repairs~ replacing deteri orated concrete th at i s the Ci ty's respon si- bi l i ty is being funded in the amount of $3 0 ,000 i n t he 3rd quarter accord i ng t o th e 19 82 budget f i ve -year plan . REC O,..ENDA TI ON The attached Resolution regarding the Public Improvement Fu nd is pr e sented for your consideration. I • • - • • • • • MEMORANDUM Cown, City Manager Director of Finance SUBJECT: Six-Quarter Budget Per your request to provide alternate methods of financing certain changes within the Public Improvement Fund, the Finance Department has drawn up six possible resolutions relating to the Six-Quarter Budget. These alternatives pertain primarily to $74,000 needed to fund the overlay progr11111 (Road, Bridge) and $65,500 needed to fund aiscellaneoua projects within the PIF. The source of funds for the overlay program (Road & Bridge) could be derived fran high- way user tax within the General Fund and would require a reduction of General Fund revenue s and a transfer to PIF. Funding the $65,500 needed for other PIF projects i s a s follows : 1. Reduce the Little Dry Creek: appropriation by $65,500. At acme later date that aaount could be replaced by the actual surplus sales and use tax collections fraa the General Fund. 2. The General Fund excess sales tax. The General Fund is presently $128,000 ahead of proj ected sales tax revenues through March, 1982; however, we expec t scae slippage i n that amount for April down to $125,000. 3. By a t rans fer f r om t h e Ge n e ral Fund balance in the amount of $65,500 . /j lw • I • • • - • • 0 SIX QUARTER BUDGET APRIL, 1982 THROUGH SEPTEMBER, 1983 EXP. PROJ . APPRO. 1982 TOTAL 1ST 2ND 3RD PROJ. APPRO. SAL. BAL . 2ND 3RD 4TH 1982 QTR. QTR . QTR. BUDGET P.T .0. P.T .0. 12/31/81 ~ 9IB.:.. 9IB.:.. APPRO . 1983 1983 1983 1. S tonn Ora i nage General 406,421 $ 406,421 397,598 $ 8,823 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ D $ D $ 0 $ 0 2. Little Dry Cr eek 3,000,000 2,898,611 940,546 1,958,065 (65,500) 130,000 194,050 258,550 398,300 100,000 0 3. Downtown Drainage & Traffic lmproveinents 180,000 180,000 D 180,000 (30,000) 0 0 (30,000) 0 0 0 4 . Downtown Plan 100,000 97,267 45,152 52,115 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 0 0 5. Traffic Improvements 85,000 50,000 1,751 48,249 85,000 0 0 85,000 0 0 0 6 . Little Ory Creek Engineering 698,500 698,500 698,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 . Street & Sidewa 1 k Pav! ng District Ho. 28 200,000 200,000 0 200,000 60,000 200,000 0 260,000 0 300,000 0 8. Road & Bridge 900,000 871,871 520,073 351, 7 374,700 0 0 37 4,700 0 0 288,034 9 . Romans Park Repa Ir 7,500 0 0 0 7 ,500 0 0 7,500 0 0 0 10 . Belleview Pump House 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 11. Centennial Park 228,260 228,260 225,781 2,479 50 .500 0 0 50,500 0 0 0 12. Belleview Storm Repair 5,000 0 0 0 4,500 0 0 4,500 0 0 0 13. Handicapped Play Apparatus 24,000 24,000 17,222 6,778 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 . River Development Phase I 3,848,111 3,848,111 3,840,522 7,589 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 . River Development Phase 11 721,300 395,850 315,174 80,676 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 . River Development Phase Ill 1,100,000 1,090,986 837,506 2S3, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17. Golf Carts 125,000 125,000 116,594 8,406 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18. S1dew1l k Repair 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 19 . Handi capped RAMP 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 . Pistol Range 32,000 20,000 4 19,996 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1. 8ro1 y Beautlflutlon 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22. orth Fire SUtlon 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 . Senior C nter P1rklng Lot 2 48,000 48,000 81 47,919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 . An1"'41 Control Shelter 110,000 33,000 0 33,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 . Fence Relocltfon 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 . Housing R habllftatlon 100,000 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 27 . ntown Develop!lle!lt Authority 100,000 75,000 58,560 16,440 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 28 . C nf ty Center Phlse I 25,000 25,000 24,583 417 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 . Hethlne Gu Convers Ion 300,000 142.000 0 142,000 (142,000) 0 50,000 (92,000) 0 0 0 30 . Bridge Repair 60,000 60,000 0 60,000 0 0 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 • 31. Golf Course Clubhouse P & 80,000 78,950 0 78,9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32. EDDA Walkthru -we t sfd 120,000 as 1000 1,962 8310 ~ ___ o ___ o 30,000 ___ o ___ o ___ o GRAN O TOlAL SIi m azz S8 DAI 6Q9 Sl Z51l 2111 s.5U.lOO. lllliJISQ. ------ • • - • RESOLUTION NO. .) ' SERIES OF 1982 -- • • • A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND Exhibit 1 'WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, desires to make certain changes within the Public Improvement Fund; NCM, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, as follows: Section 1. The following e stimated revenues and appropriations of funds are hereby mad e in the Public I111Provement Fund: Source of Funds: General Fund Total Application of Funds: Downtown Drainage & Traffic I111Provements Traffic Improvements Methane Gas Conversion Street and Sidewalk District No. 28 Romans Park Restroom Repair Belleview Pu~ House EDDA Walkthru -west side Ce ntennia l Park Belleview Storm Repair Total Sectio n 2 . $65,500 $65,500 $(30,000) 35,000 (142,000) 60,000 7,500 50,000 30,000 50,500 4,500 $65,500 1ll following app r opria tion of funds is h reby made in the Gen ral Fund. Source of Funds: General Fund Balan c $65,500 Applic tion of Funds: PIF Tran f r $65,500 S ction 3. 1ll City Manag er and Dir c tor of Financ are her by authoriz d to mak th abov ch ng s to th 1982 Bud t of the City o! !n 1 wood . ADOPTED AND APPROVED this __ day of-----• 1982. • I • • D - • • • • • -2- ATIEST: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, a c curate and co~lete copy of Resolution No.~~~' Series of 1982. Gary R. Higbee • I • • - • • • • Exhibit 2. RESOLUTION NO. SERIES OF 1982 ~~ to make ION AMENDING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND EREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood, Col ado, desires ain changes within the Public Improvement Fund; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci of the City of Englewood, Col rado, as follows: / revenues and appropriations of funds are Improvement Fund: Source of General F Highway Us r Total I Application of unds: Downtown Drai~ge & Traffic Improvements Traffic Impro~nts Methane Gas Con~sion Street and Sidew lk Di strict No. 28 Romans Park Restr om Repair Belleview Puq, Hous e EDDA Walkthru -wes side Road and Bridge Centennial Park Belleview Storm Repair Total Section 2. $65,500 74,000 $139,500 $(30,000) 35,000 (142,000) 60,000 7,500 50,000 30,000 74,000 50,500 4.500 $139.500 Tiie followin appropriation o funds is hereby made in the General Fund. Sourc of Funds: G n r 1 Fund Bal nee Highway Uaera Tax Tot 1 Application of Funds: PIF Tranaf r S ction 3. $65,500 ~00 $139,500 $139 .500 The City Hana th abo chan rand Dir ctor of Finance ate h reby authorized to 111ak a to the 1982 Budget of the City of Englewood. I • • I n - r • • • • -2- ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS __ day of-----· 1982. Eugene L. Otis, Mayor ATTEST: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and co~lete copy of Resolution No.~~-• Series of 1982. Gary R. Higbee I • • - • • • • • Exhibit 3. RE SOLU TI ON NO. SERIES OF 1982 A RESOLUTI to make AMENDING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND AS, the City Conncil of the City of Englewood, Colorado, desires changes within the Public Improvement Fnnd; NOW, TH~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Conncil oft Englewood, Colorado, as follows: City of Section l. The following hereby made in stimated revenues and appropriations of fnnds are e Public Improvement Fund: Source of Funds: General Fund Highway User Tax Total Application of Funds: Downtown Drainage & Traffi'c Improvements Traffic Improvements Methane Ga s Conversion Street and Sidewalk Distric t No. 28 Romans Park Restroom Repair Belleview Pu111> House EDDA Walkthru -west side Road and Bridge Cente nnial Park Be lleview Storm Repair To t al Sec tion 2 . $65,500 74,000 $139,500 $(30,000) 35,000 (142,000) 60,000 7,500 50,000 30,000 74,000 50,500 4,500 $139,500 The following approp riation of fnnds is hereby made i n the Ge ner a l Fund . Sourc of Funds: G neral Fund Sale• Tax Highway Users Tax Total Application of Funds: PIF Tr nsf r PIF Proj eta Total Secttoo ). $65 ,500 74 ,000 ~139 ,500 $7 ,00 0 65 ;,50 0 $139, 'ioo Th City Manag rand Di r ector of Finance ar hereby a uthori z d to ke the abo chan a to the 1982 Budg t of the Ci t y of En gl ood • • I • • • • • • -2- AOOPTED AND APPROVED THIS __ day of-----• 1982. Eugene L. Otis, Mayor ATTEST: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and co~lete copy of Resolution No. ___ , Series of 1982. Gary R. Higbee • I • • - 0 • • • • Exhibit 4. RESOLUTION NO. SERIES OF 1982 A RESOLUT N AMENDING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND t o make WH S, the City Council of the City of Englewood, changes within the Public Improvement Fund; NOW, EREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Coun¢1 of the City of Englewood, Colora as follows: Se c tion 'Ille followi estimated revenues and appropriations of funds are hereby made the Public Improvement Fund: Source of General Total / Application Downtown Drainage -iraffic Improvements Traffic Improvemen Methane Gas Convei,si n Street and Sidew~lk strict No. 28 Romans Park Restroom R pair Belleview Pump House EDDA Walkthru -west sid Centennial Pirk Belleview Storm Repair Total Section 2 . $65,500 $65,500 ${30,000) 35,000 (142,000) 60,000 7,500 50,000 30,000 50,500 4,500 $65,500 'Ille following appropriation of funs is hereby made in the General Fund. Source of Funds: G neral Fund Sales Tax $65,500 Applic tion of Funds: PIF Projects $65 ,500 Section 3. 'Ille City Man er and Director of Finance are he~eby authorized to mak the above chang s to th 1982 Budg t of the City of Englewood. ~ ADOPTED AND APPROVED nns __ day of-----· 1982. Eu n L. Otia , Mayor • I • • I n -- - • • • • • -2- ATIEST: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and co~lete copy of Resolution No.~~~• Series of 1982. Gary R. Higbee I • • - • RESOLUTION NO, SERIES Ol_ 1982 A RESOLUTION A • • - ING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood, to make certain cha within the Public Improvement Fund; Exhibit 5. , BE IT RESOLVED by the City Co follows: 11 of the City of ATTEST: Section 1. mated revenues an appropriations of funds are Public Improvement Fund: Application of Funds Little Dry Creek Downtown Drainage & Traffic Improvements Methane Gas Conversion Street and Sidewalk D Romans Park Restroom Belleview Pump Hous EDDA Walkthru -we,t side Centennial Park Belleview Storm iepair Total Section 2. Tite City Mana g er and Director the above chang s to the 1982 No. 28 $(65,500) (30,000) 35,000 (142,000) 60,000 7,500 50,000 30,000 50,500 4,500 $ 0 authorized to mak e Englewood . x officioid:ty Cl rk-Tr uurer I, Cary R, En l ood , Colored , accura t e and co111pl t x officio City Cl rlc-Tr aaurer of the Cit of c rtify that th abo and for oin ia a tr aolutlon o. ---• S ri • of 1982. Cary R. Hi b I • • - • • RESOLUTION NO. SERIES OF 1982 • • • A RESOLUTIO AMENDING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND Exhibit 6. WH , the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, sires to make certain hanges within the Public Improvement Fund; NOW, TH FORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council o the City of Englewood, Colorado; as follows: /' Section 1. / 1be following e imated revenues and apprJPriations of funds are hereby made in tH Public Improvement Fund: Source of Funds: Highway User Tax Total Application of Funds: Little Dry Creek Downtown Drainage & Traf~c Traffic Improvements Methane Gas Conversion Street and Sidewalk D~~trict Romans Park Restroom Repair Belleview Pump House' EDDA Walkthru -we/t side Centennial Park Belleview Storm ~pair Total Section 2. I I Improvements $74,000 $74,000 $(65, 500) (30,000) 35,000 (142,000) 60,000 7,500 50,000 30,000 50,500 4,500 $74,000 'nle following appropriation of funds is h reby made in the General Fund. Source of Funds: Highway Users Tax $ (74,000) Application of Funds: PIF Transfer $74,000 Secti<m 3. 1b City Manag rand Director of Finance are hereby authorized to k th abov ch n s to th 1982 Budg t of the City of Engl wood • ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS __ day of-----• 1982. Eu n L. Otis, Mayor • I • • • • • • -2- A'ITEST: ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of Resolution No. ___ , Series of 1982. Gary R. Higbee I • • µ- • • • • • TO : ENG[»o)I) CTIY CX>tH:Il. REGARDn«:; RECDHNDA.TIOO OF 'niE PARKS AND RECREATIOO mMISSICN Dl\1E : April 13, 1982 SUBJECT : REQlEST 'llfAT FmOO BE MME AVA!u\BIE FOO. REPAIRS TO BElll.:VIllJ PARK SPRm<IER SYSTEM. REaM£Nllf\TICN : That m:ni.es be appropriated for the purpose of repairing the Belleview Parle sprinkler systan to alleviate recurring UBlftnctions . • I . . - • • • • • R, 1983 ~ttached is a copy of the S1x-4uarLer Budget covering the period of April, 1982 thru September, 1983. The resolution approving this budget was approved by Council at2their regular meeting I If L ·, -J~i J/ri,~ ANDY cCOWJII Cit Manager pc last Monday, May 3. cc: Peter H. Vargas, Assistant City Manager Rick DeWitt, City Attorney • I • • I • • • 0 I . • - • • • • • MEMORANDUM TO: All Department Heads FROM: Andy Mccown, City Manager DATE: May 5, 1982 SUBJECT: SIX-QUARTER BUDGET APRIL, 1982 THRU SEPTEMBER, 1983 ftttached is a copy of the Six-Quarter Budget covering the period of April, 1982 thru September, 1983. The resolution approving this budget was approved by Council a 2ttheir regular meeting last Monday, May 3. I If ' I/ (},J ./ ' 10.~·:..: ///(.·~ LANDY cCOWN" Cit Manager pc cc: Peter H. Vargas, Assistant City Manager Rick DeWitt, City Attorney • I • • n - • RESOLUTION NO. 22 SERIES OF 1982 -- • • • A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND Exhibit 1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Engl-ood 0 Colorado, desires to make certain changes within the Public Iaproveaent Pund; NCM, THEREFO&E, BE IT llESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado. aa follows, Section 1. The following eati-ted revenuea and appropriations of funda are hereby aade in the Public I11prowaent l'uncl: Source of Funda: General Pund Total Application of Funds: Downtown Drainage 6 Traffic I11111row•nts Traffic Iaprove•nta Hethane Gas Conversion Street and Sidewalk District No. 28 ao-ns Park llestrooa Repair Belleview Pu11111 Houae EDDA Walkthru -west side Centenoial Parlt lellevi-Stora lapair Total Section 2. $30,500 $30,500 $(30.000) 35,000 (142,000) 25,000 7,500 50,000 30,000 so.soo 4.~o lli~ The following appropriation of funds is hereby aade in the Gene ral Fun d . Sour c e o f Punda : Ge n eral Fu n d Balan ce $30,500 Application of Fu nds: PIF Transfer $30 ,500 Section 3. Th e City Manager and Director of Finance are hereby authorised to Mite the above changea t o the 1982 Budaet of the City of Englewood. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 3rd day of __ *_Y __ , 1982. Euaene L. Otie, Mayor • I • • -• • • r---------------------------------------------, • C O U N C I L DATE Ma y 3, 1982 INITIATED BY C O M M U N I C A T I O N AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT rb Six-Quarter Budget April, 1982 through September, 1983 ACT I ON PROPOSED Consideration in adopting a Resolution of the Six-Quarter Budget - April, 1982 through September, 1983 BACKGROUND The Public Improvement Fund (PIF) Six-Quarter Budget process was adopted in the summer of 1973. The essence of the Six-Quarter Budget is that the City ha s a continuing budget which extends one-and-one-half years into the future. Every q uarter, the City Council reviews and analyzes this budget, and if projects are delayed due to unavoidable circumstances, they are dropped back in this budget, while projects ready to go are moved forward. The most current revenue forecasts are used and, if additional funds become available, specific projects could be moved forward and complete d ahead of schedule or a new or elll8rgency project could be a dded. 1982 CHANGES Downtown Drainage and Traffic Improvements was reduced by $30,000 in the 2nd qu rter to fund the EDDA Walk-Thru on the west side of the 3400 block vf South Broadway. Tr.~ff ic lmpro vem n s wa s 1.n c r e a s ed by $35,000 in Lhc 2nd qua rLcr to replace f und that w re taken out in December, 1981 to balance the PIF fund. These fun d s wl.l l be used to purchase four additional tr ffic controll rs in 1982. Sid walk District (PO #28) was increased by $25,000 in the 2nd quar- ov rlay four streets in the Centennial Acres area that w re removed from du to prior Council's commitment to maintain those str ets t no cost prop rty owners. Ro man a Park Restroom Rep irs -is a new project to repair the structural wooden w lla o th r atroom th t red teriorated. Th t coat i s stimated at $7,500. • I • • - • • • • • -2- Belleview Park Pumphouse ~ is a new project to replace the existing irrigation pumphouse and install three pumps that irrigate the park from the water filter plant backwash pond. The $50,000 added in the 2nd quarter wi 11 be s uppl e111enled by $35,000 presently in the Parks and Recreation Department budget, making the total project $85,000. Centennial Park project was the improvements around the lake~ the waterfall, the jogging trail, etc. We have now included the Hall property purchase under this project. The $50,500 in the 2nd quarter is for the land purchase. Belleview Storm Repair project constructed the new flow channel in Belleview Park. In 1981, $4,500 was taken to balance the PIF fund. In the 2nd quarter, those funds are being re-appropriated for erosion control. Methane Gas Conversion project to purchase a scrubber unit to clean the methane gas produced by the sewage treatment plant is no longer being considered. The remaining $142,000 available to this project is being returned to the PIF fund for disbursement to the other above-mentioned projects. 1983 ADD I TI ONS Road and Bridge project for annual overlay and sealcoats on streets is being funded in the amount of $281,034 in the 3rd quarter in accordance with the 1982 budget five-year plan. Sidewalk Repairs~ replacing deteriorated concrete that is the City's responsi- bility is being funded in the amount of $30,000 in the 3rd quarter according to the 1982 budget five-year plan. RECOMMENDATION Th e attached Resolution regarding the Public Improvement Fund is presented for your consideratio n . • I • • • • • 0 SIX QUARiER BUDG ET APRIL, 1982 THROUGH SEPTEMBER, 1983 EXP. PROJ . APPRO . 1982 TOTAL 1ST 21D 3RD PROJ. APPRO. 6,'\L. BAL . zrrn 3RD 4TH 1982 QTR. QTR. QTR. BUDGET P.T .0. P.T .0. 12/31 /8 1 ~ ~ ~ APPRO . 1983 1983 1983 I. Storm Drai nage General s 406,421 s 406,421 s 397,598 $ 8,823 $ 0 s 0 S 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 s 0 2. Litt 1 e Ory Creek 3,000,000 2,898,611 940,546 1,958,065 0 130,000 194,050 324,050 398,300 100,000 0 3. Downtown Drainage & Traffic Improvement s 180,000 180,000 0 180,000 (30 ,000) 0 0 (30 ,000) 0 0 0 4 . Downtown Plan 100,000 97,267 45,152 52,115 0 50,000 0 50,000 0 0 0 5 . Traffic l111Provements 85,000 50,000 1,751 48,249 85,000 0 0 85,000 0 0 0 6. Little Dry Creek Engineering 698,500 698,500 698,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 . Street & Sidewalk Paving District No . 28 200,000 200,000 0 200,000 25,000 200,000 0 225,000 0 300,000 0 8 . Road & Bridge 900,000 871,871 520,073 351. 798 300,700 0 0 300,700 0 0 288,034 9 . Romans Park Repair 7,500 0 0 0 7,50 0 0 7,500 0 0 0 10 . Belleview P1111p House 50,000 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 11. Centennla 1 Park 228,260 228,260 225,781 2,479 50,500 0 0 50,500 0 0 0 12. Belleview Storm Repair 5,000 0 0 0 4,500 0 0 4,500 0 0 0 13 . Handicapped Play Apparatus 24,000 24,000 17,222 6,778 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14. River Development Phase I 3,848, 11! 3,848,111 3,840,522 7,589 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15. River Oevelopaent Phase II 721,300 395,850 315,174 80,676 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I . River Develol]lllent Phase II I l, 100,000 1,090,986 837,506 253,480 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17. Golf Carts 125,000 125,000 116,594 8,406 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18. Sid alk R pair 30,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30,000 19. Hand fc1pped RilllP 1,500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20. Phtol Range 32,000 20,000 4 19,996 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21. Bl'Oldway B autiflc1tlon 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22. r orth Fire Station 500,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23. Senior Center Parking Lot ·~ 48,000 48,000 81 47,919 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24. Anl1111l Control Shelter 110,000 33,000 0 33,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 . I Fen ce Relocation 10,000 10,000 0 10,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26. Housing R habflitltlon 100,000 100,000 0 100,000 100,000 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 21 to~n Develoi-i,t Autho<I ty 100,000 75,000 58,560 16,440 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 C ounl ty Center Phase I 25,000 25,000 24,583 417 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 29 th.Int Cu Conv rs io 300,000 142,000 0 142,000 (142 .000) 0 50,000 (92,000) 0 0 0 30. Bridge Re~ tr 60,000 60,000 0 60 ,000 0 0 60,000 60,000 0 0 0 31. Golf Course Clubhouse P & : 0,000 78,950 0 78,950 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 • fDOA 1 thru • St Sid 120 000 851000 11962 83 1038 301000 ___ o ___ o 301000 ___ o ___ o ___ o 0 TOT Sll Z!l1 az z S! DU 609 SJ 25 C Zl8 ~ ill2.&2Q ----- • • • • r---------------------------------------. ' I • C O U N C I L DATE April 28, 1982 C O M M U N I C A T I O N AGENDA ITEM ~ C, SUBJECT 3449 South Broadway and 126-130 East Girard Avenue ,1 INITIATED BY ACTION PROPOSED "-'f J' Department of EnQineerinQ Services £1'1' F Award of contract for Demolition of Structures and Site Prepara- tion at 3449 South Broadway and 126-130 East Girard Avenue BA CKGROU ND Th e City purchased property known as 126-130 East Girard Avenue in 1981 to pro- vi de additional parking for Orchard Place, the Simon Center.and the Elsie Malley Centennial Center. The parking lot improvements are expected to be completed by mid-summer, 1982. Demolition on existing structures and site preparation comprise the first phase of the total project, and it is our intent to have this work completed prior to May 16, 1982, which is the date of the dedi- cation of Orchard Place. Th e property known as 3449 South Broadway was acquired by the City in early 1982 after a fire destroyed the building located at that site. The owner of the buildi ng was required to remove the structure to ground level to eliminate a hazardous co nd itio n. At this time, it is necessary for the City to remove the existing floor and foundation walls to below ground, fill and properly com pact thee isting basement. Temporary wa lk-th ru-type improvements are anticipated at a later date. Fl NAtlC IAL $47,000 has been appropriated in the 1982 PIF for th e constructio n of the parki ng lot at 126-130 East Girard Avenue. At the time of the purchase of 3449 South Broadway, in anticipation of the required demolition and back- filling of the basement, $10,000 wa s appropriated . Est. Expenditures Available Fu nding East Girard South Broad way $ 6,487.50 11,762.50 $18 ,250.00 Funding availabl for constructio n of parking lo $4 7 ,000 .00 10 ,000.00 $57,000.00 -18,250.00 $38 ,750 .00 ·-~--~--~~--- I • • - • • • • ---------------------------------------------. -2- RECOMMENDATION Three bids were received, as follows: Abbott Construction Co., Inc. Bob Anderson Wrecking & Excavating, Inc. Howard's Used Brick & Demolition Engineer's Estimate $28,052.00 23,400.00 18,250.00 $31,020.00 We recorrrnend that the contract for this project be awarded to the low bidder, Howard 's Used Brick & Demolition, in the amount of $18,250. Howard's Used Brick and Demolition is a small but established company with wh i ch the City has not had previous experience. We have verified their references and they do appear to be well-qualified to handle this project. We did receive good recorrrnendations from previous and current employers. • I • • - • • • • C O U N C I L C O M M U N I C A T I O N DATE April 28, 1982 AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT SPENCER BALLFIELD LIGHTING RO E. P. Romans, Director of Parks & Recreation INITIATED BY John Lowry, Assistant Director of Finance ACTION PROPOSED Acceptance Of Low Bid For Ballfield Ljqhtjnq Bids for Spencer Ballfield Lighting Assembly & Pole Erection were opened April, at 10:00 a.m., MST. Bids were submitted as follows : Maupin Electric Co. Sturgeon Electric $17,288.00 19,688.00 Rec011111endation: Acceptance of low bid from Maup in Electric Co. for $17,288.00 This bid is the last phase for project completion. The City purchased all materials through competitive bid in order to complete the project on a projected May 1 deadline. The projected final completion date is May 5, 1982, in time for the 1982 softball season. New underground copper wire in conduit, steel poles and 28 1500 watt metal Halide fixtures are basic top quality features of this project. Funds allocated for the total lighting budget in 1982 is $45,000. I . . • DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Mr. Roger Maupin Maupin Electric Co. 1133 W. Custer Place Denver, CO 80223 (Contractor) • • • NOTICE OF AWARD CITY OF ENGLEWOOD The City of Englewood having duly considered the Proposals submitted on April 22, 1982 for providing: LIGHTING ASSEMBLY & POLE ERECTION FOR SPENCER BALLFIELD LIGHTING as outlined in these Contract Documents and detailed on the Drawings, and it appearing that your Proposal for perfonning the work outlined is fair, equitable and to its best interest, the said Proposal is hereby accepted at the bid prices contained herein. ln accordance with the tenns of these Contract Documents, you are required to execute the formal Contract Agreement within ten (10) consecutive calendar days from and including the date of this notice. In addition, you are requested to furnish at the same time (5) copies of certi- ficate of insurance evidencing compliance with the requirements for insurance stated in the Contract Documents. Your certificate shall be accompanied by a letter from your insurance company stating that the insurance certified meets the requirements of the Contract Documents. The Bid Security submitted with your Proposal will be retained until the Contract Agreement has been executed. In event that you should fail to exec.ute the Con- tract Agreement within the time limit specified, a relative portion of the said Proposal Guarantee will be retained as liquidated damages and not as penalty for the delay and extra work caused thereby. Total contract price is $17,288 .00 Completion Date is on or before May 6, 1982. City of Englewood By ______________ _ • I • • • • • - C O U N C I L C O M M U N I C A T I O N DATE April 14, 1982 INITIATED BY SUBJECT AGENDA ITEM 4, Rec-ndation of Downtown Management Com- f Downtown Management Comaittee ACTION PROPOSED That the City of Englewood enter into contract with Design Worksh op, Inc. for coordination of Little Dry Creek project with Downtown Plan. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Several months ago the City Council, Englewood Downtown Development Auth~rity, and the Urban Renewal Authority agreed to utilize a Management COllaittee structure for the implementation of the downtown plan. There was also general agreement that the services of Design Workshop, Inc., were critical to guarantee a coordinated public-private development that is consistent with the downtown plan. e Manage - ment Co1111littee, made up of Jim Mosier (Brady Corporation), Mike Haviland (Englewood Downtown Development Authority), and Susan Powers (City and Urban Renewal Authority ), was asked to review the possible relationship that could be established with Design Workshop, Inc. The Committee feels that the role of Design Worltahop, Inc., in Englewood is important and will change through time depending on the type of public and privat projects to be undertaken. At the present time, the design of the Little Dry Cr ek improvements are proceeding, and Don Ensign has been asked to participate in the design team meetings to address the various issues that tie the downt-own plan to the Little Dry Creek project. Hi s advice and coaaenta have been xtr mely valuable during this phase. The Management Comaittee feels that this type of input, while benefitting th ntire downtown development effort, is most directly relat d to the apecific Little Dry Creek proj ct and should, therefore, be a City reaponaibility for reimbursement. When adv lopaent agre nt haa b n antered into between a developer and the City, th ork of D sign Workshop, Inc. wi ll xpand into a broad r coordination rol , and involve other partie1 for pa}"llent of the f e for Design Workshop. Thia will the caa for tha aark tin phas of the prograa, which say comaitment froa EDDA and tha City aay not be involved at all. Th purpo1 proc ding at thi1 point with a aingl contract ia to enable the na Cot111i tt e to retain th ae rvicea of D 1ian Worltahop, Inc., for the Littl k proj ct wh ich ia already underway. It aay ba aevaral aonths b fore the d v lopaent agre nt 11 1igned and• aark ting prograa 11 undertaken, ao it wai t for tho a action• to occur before contracting with at • I • • - • • • • It is suggested that the City enter into a contract with DWI on a tiae and aaterials basis at established rates, with an upper lilllit of $20,000 established. The scope of work for the contract would include consulting services regarding the Little Dry Creek flood c ontrol project and its relationship to the overall downtown plan. RECOMMENDATION: It is recoDDended that the City Council instruet the City Attorney to prepare a con- tract between the City of Englewood and Design Workshop, Inc., for consulting services as outlined above . SUGGESTED ACTION : MOVED IY ___________ _ SECOND ____________ _ I • • - • • • • - AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ____ day of _________ _ 1982, by and between the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, a Municipal corporation, 3400 South Elati Street, Englewood, Colorado ("City"), and DESIGN WORKSHOP, INC., 415 South Spring Street, Aspen, Colorado. WHEREAS, the City has authorized a Management Committee to coordinate and implement a plan for the redevelopment of downtown Englwood; and WHEREAS, such Committee is comprised of representatives from Englewood Downtown Development Authority, Englewood Urban Renewal Authority, the City of Englewood, and Brady Corporation; and WHEREAS, the services of Design Workshop, Inc. are deemed essential to work with the Management Co mmittee in coordinating the downtown plan; and WHEREAS, Design Workshop has already undertaken extensive preparatory work related to the planning process for downtown Englewood; and WHEREAS, part of the process involves improvements to the Little Dry Creek project, which is of particular interest to the City of Englewood. NOW, THEREFORE , in consid ration of the mutual promises and covenants herein, the parties agr follo ws: 1. Design Workshop will participate requested in all meetings of the engaged in the ov rall coordination of the downtown Englewood red velopm n pr, I • • • • - 2. Design Workshop wm prnvide technical recommendations regarding the relationship of the Little Dry Creek design to the overall downtown redevelopment plan. 3. Design Workshop wm review preliminary and final design work for Little Dry Creek improvement and suggest changes or adj..lstments where neces.ary to insure compatibility with the Downtown Plan. 4. Design Workshop wm provide any other advisory services to the Management Committee as that Committee shall, from time to time, request. 5. Design Workshop will be compensated in accordance with the following hourly rates: Principal Designer 1 Designer 2 Designer 3 Designer 4 Production Clerical $65/hour $50/hour $40/hour $35/hour $27//hour $23/hour $15/hour 6. Design Workshop will be compensated for trarv;port.ation, lodging, long-distance phone calls, etc., connected with its services under this contract, subject to apprnval o f the Management Committee. 7. Compensation under this contract shall not exceed $20,000. 8. Billing shall be submitted on a monthly basis, and Design Workshop shall maintain detailed reports of all rvic and expe bill. 9. 'lbe parties recognize tha certain to be 9.lbmitted with each required of Design Workshop under this contract have alr ady n st.art.ed nd partially or fully co11pleud prior to the xecution of this -'gr ment. Design Workshop llhall mit blll1ngs for SJch ctivities in accord nee with the terms o this -'9 men and llhall be com pensated according to rm and any amoun a:> reimbuned llhall be includ in th total contract aw rd o $20,000. -2- I • • - ; . • • • • • 10. Either party may c ancel this contract upon thirty da-pf written notice. Upon cancellation, amounts billed and due shall be paid but no further portions of the budgeted amount beyond that shall be due. 11. nus Agreement is 9..lbject to the laws of the State of colorado. nus Agreement shall not be modified or revoked except by sl.11D.ar imt:rument in writing signed by the original parties. nus Agreement inures to the benefit of the parties hereto, their hei.Is, 9.ICCeseors and assig~ though the contract may not be assigned without the prior written approval of the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this contract the day a nd year fir'St above written. Attest: Attest: -3- ClTY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO a Municipal Corporation By ____________ _ DESIGN WORK SHOP, IN C. By ___________ _ I • • 1 annual financial report I fiscal year ended december 31 , 198 1 I I I I I I - City of Englewood, Colorado r [ l l I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO annual financial report the city of englewood, colorado fiscal year ended december 31, 1981 submitted by department of finance I . • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLO RADO DIRECTORY OF ELECTED OFFICIALS Eugene L. Otis, Mayor Beverly Bradshaw, Mayor Pro Tem, Council Member, At-Large Joe Bilo , Council Member, At-Large Tom Fitzpatrick, Council Member, District I John Neal, Council Member, District II Jim Higday, Council Member, District III Robert B. Weist, Council Member, District IV ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF And y Mccown, City Manager Richard S. Wanush, Assistant Ci t y Manager Rick D Witt, City Attorney DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE Gary Higb , Dir ctor of Fin nc John R. Lowry, Assistant Dir ctor of Finance Alfr d L. Rho d s, Purchasing Ag nt Eric E. Joh nnisson, R venu Chi f Margart L. Fr man, Syst ms An lyst , I • • - l L I I I • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT March 31, 1982 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council 340 0 South Elatl Street Engl~wood, Colorado, 80110 Dear )iay or and Council Members: • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO The annual financial report for the year ended December 31, 1981, ls submitted herewith in compliance with provisions of the Charter of the City of Englewood. Management believes that the data ls presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the financial position and results of operations of the City as measured by the financial activity of its various funds; and that all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain the maximum understanding of the City's financial affairs have been included . In dev loping and valu ting the City's accounting system , consideration is given to the ad quacy of internal accounting controls as discu sed by the Finance Dir ctor in his accompanying lett r of transmittal, and within that framework, lb llev that the City's int rnal accounting controls adequately safeguard ssets and provide recording of financial transactions . This r epo rt utiliz d th Offic rs Association of governm nt t nt tally gf'n r lly Counc 11 of r vl w. and for In ccord nc of En I wood with h bov ~ ntlon d guld lln s th ccomp nyin City fn ncldl r port con 1st, o thr e part,: (I) lntr duct ry • ('ti n, Including h l'tn nc Dir ctor', l tter o tr n •I t l; • 0 I • • - • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Page 2 The Mayor and Council Members March 31, 1982 • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO (2) Financial section, including the financial statements and supple- mental data of the government accompanied by our independent au- ditor's opinion; (3) Statistical section, including a number of tables of unaudited data depicting the financial history of the government for the past 10 years, information on overlapping governments, and demo- graphic and other miscellaneous information. In addition, financial reports for the pension and retirement funds, City of Englewood and Littleton Bi-City Treatment Plant Joint Venture, the Englewood Housing Authority and Englewood Downtown Development Au- thority are included in thi document. While the Downtown Development Authority and Housing Authority are separate jurisdictions under state law, the City of Englewood performs accounting and other administrative functions for these entitie ; and therefore, with the combining of these entities within one report provides a complete overview of the City of Englewood. In addition, th City of Englewood and the Englewood Hous- ing Authority in cooperation with our auditors have implemented a single audit approach which is more fully described in the Finance Director's letter of transmitt 1. The annual financial report has been prepared by the Director of Finance. This report will serve as both the financial report and the audit report of the City . nie opinion of Lehman, Butterwick and Company, Certified Public Accountants, is contained herein. pectfull~ cCown Manag r AM/ jlw I • • • - • • 0 CITIZENS BOARDS I AND-CITY COUNCIL-CITY ATTY. COMM ISSK)NS I CITY MrAGER ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER I I ..... L .... I FIRE POLICE PU8LIC WORKS WATER LIBRARY PARKS COM MUNITY DE VELOPMENT I Adm 1n .. trotioft I S-IStnlcH I Ad'91U'UI troflOft ANO Z. Pr ev•"'''°" Z ..... .,,,,0110• z ,or Surre., SE WER 3 fltt•tv• 3 .. , .... , ,.,.,,., 3.S""'' An4 • s...,,.,,,on 4 Potrol o. ...... ANO I CO<lo Eolorc1m1 01 RECREATION 2 Hou•••o 3.-·· et, Yoh1ftt ter1 S , .... ,1,,,, ... 4. TNtffiC [ntlnH rill9 TNtftffll S G-rol O,•etlo,,1 W Mo 1nt1nonc1 • • ANANCE l r-... ,y AM Rtcor4 2 ........ ,,"' W AIM 1t1nt 3.Rt ..... 4POfC- 5. Otto ...__., > z z C > ' .,, z > z () > ' :D m ~ :D -4 (") ~ -< Sil m ~ ,... m ~ 0 () 0 ' 0 § • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Title Page Directory of Elected Officials Transmittal Letter Organizational Chart Table of Contents Finance Director's Report Certificate of Conformance • • • TABLE OF CONT ENTS INTRODUCTORY SECTION FINANCIAL SECTION Report of Certified Public Accountants General Purpose Financial Statements COLORADO PAGE 10 Combined Balance Sheet -All Fund Types and Account Groups 12 Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Unreserved Fund Balances -All Governmental Fund Types 14 Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Encumbrances, and Changes in Fund Balances -Budget and Actual -All Budgeted Governm ntal Fund Types 16 Co mbined Statem nt of Rev enues, Expenses, and Changes in Retained Earnings -All Proprietary Fund Types 18 Com bine d Stateme nt of Revenues , Expenditures and Encumbrances - Bud get and Actual -Ente rprise Funds 19 Combined Stat em nt of Changes in Financial Position -All Pr oprietary Fun d Types 20 Notes to Financial Stat m nts 21 Combining and Individual Fund and Account Group St tem nt a and Schedule G ner 1 Fund 28 St tem nt of Rev nu , Exp enditures, and Encumbr nces, and Ch ng ln Unres rv d Fund Bal nee -Budg et and Actual 29 Special As ssm nt Fund• Combinln Blan Sh t Coablnln tate• nt of v nu, Exp ndltur I and Chan ln Unre rv d und Blane • 30 32 I • • - • I [ l L L • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Enterprise Funds Water, Sewer and Municipal Golf Course Funds Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Operations and Changes in Retained Earnings Water Utility Fund -Statements of Revenues, Exp e nditures, and Encumbrances -Budget and Actual Sewer Utility Fund -Statements of Revenues, Expenditures, and Encumbrances -Budget and Actual Municipal Golf Course Fund -Statements of Revenues, Expenditures and Encumbrances -Budget and Actual Combining Statement of Changes in Financial Position I nternal Se rvi ce Funds Co mbining Balance She t Combining Statement of Op ration and Changes in Ret ined Earnings Combining St tem nt of Ch ng a ln Fin ncial Position Gener 1 Fixed Asst Group of Accounts Stat m nt of Ch ng sin G n ral Fix d Assets by Fund nd Function Combined Sch dule of Inv st nts nd C n r 1 Cash Schedul of Fed ral Grant Activity Compli nee R port on Sin 1 Audit • PA GE 36 38 39 40 41 42 44 46 47 50 51 52 53 I • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLO RADO TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) STATISTICAL SECTION General Governmental Exp enditure s by Function General and Special Revenue Funds -Revenue by Source Tax Revenues by Source Property Tax Levies and Collections Assessed and Estimated Actua l Value of Taxable Property Property Tax Rates per $1,000 Assessed Valuation - All Overlapping Governments Special Assessment Collections Comparative Ratio of Bonded Debt to Assessed Value and Bonded Debt Per Capita Computation of Direct and Ove rlapping Debt - General Obligations Computation of Legal Debt Margin Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bond d Debt to Total General Expenditures R venu Bond Cover g 0 be S rvtc R quirem nt to Maturity Summary of D bt Service R quire nt to Maturity Schedule of In ur nee In Force Annu 1 S lari sand Surety Bonds of Principal Officials 1981 Asses d Valu tlon of T n L rge t T xpayers Ml c ll n ou Stati1tlcal Data • TABLE NUMBER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PAGE 56 57 58 59 61 62 62 63 63 64 65 66 68 69 70 71 72 I • - I I I L l I • I ~' • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Retirement and Pension Funds Report of Certified Public Accountants Employees' Retirement Fund Statements of Net Assets Available for Plan Benefits Statements of Changes in Net Assets Available for Plan Benefits Policemen's Pension Fund Statements of Net Assets Available for Plan Benefits Statements of Changes in Net Assets Available for Plan Benefits Firemen's Pension Fund Statements of Net Asset s Available for Plan Benefits Statem nts of Change in Net Assets Available fo r Plan Benefits Notes to Financial Statements Cities of Englewood and Littleton Bi-City Treatment Plant Joint Ventur Report of Certified Public Accountants Balance Sheets Statem nt s of Op r tlona Statem nt s of Change ln Ventur r ' Equity Statements of Change in Financial Position otes to Financial Stat m nt , Housing Authorit of th City of En 1 wood Table of Co nt e nt s • PAGE P-1 P-2 P-3 P-4 P-5 P-6 P-7 P-8 8-1 8-2 8-3 8- 8-5 8-6 H-1 0 I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Englewood Downtown Development Authority Table of Contents Supplemental Schedule Required by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for Section 8 Existing Program -This section provided only to the Department of Housing and Urban Development • PAGE D-1 S-1 l I • • [ l I I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO Mar ch 31, 1982 Andy McCown, City Manager City of Englewood 3400 South Elatl Street Englewood, Colorado 8011 0 Dear Mr. McCown: The annual financial report of the City of Englewoo d, Colorado, for the fiscal period e nd e d December 31, 1981, is submitted herewith in accordance with the provisions of the Home Rule Cha rt e r of the City of Englewood, Colorado, Arti c l e X, Section 98 (k). We belie ve the data is presented in a mann e r designed to fairly set fo rth the financial position and results of operations of the City as me as ure d by the financial activity of its various fu nd s; and that all disclosures nec essa ry to enable the reader to gain the maximum understanding of the City's financial affai rs have been included . Accounting System and Budg etary Control In developing and evaluating the City's accounting system, consideration ls given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls . Internal accounting cont r ols a r e designed to provide r eas onable, but not absolute, assurance r ega rding : (1) the safe- guarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition; and (2) the reliability of financial records for preparing financial s tatement and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of r easonable assurance r ecognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefit s likely to b d erived; and (2) th e evaluation o f cos t s and be nefit s requires estimat es and judgements by manage- ment . All internal control e valuations occur within the above f ram e work . We be - lieve that the City's internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide r easonable assurance of proper recording of financial tran actions . Th e City 's accounting records for gen r al gove rnm ntal operation are maintained on a modified accrual basis, with revenue generally being record d when r eceived and expenditures being r cord d when incurred. Accounting r co rd s for th City' utility and other proprietary fund type ar maint ined on a full accrual ba i C n r lly, of th ccordanc with the revised Covernm nt 1 publication a publi of the United Stat wh er by r port nd Th R eort lng Ent lty nd Its S rvic a 1111& r port includ s 11 of th funds nd accoun groups of th City . n, City provld a th full r ng o unlcipal I rvices cont mpl ted by the City Chart r or char cte r. Thia includ public I f t ( police nd fl r ) , hi hwaye nd ch I • • I- • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO streets, water and sewer services, culture-r ecreation, public improvements , planning and zoning, and general administrative service • In addition, this year's report has been expa nd ed o lnclud not onl Englewood-Littleton Wastewater Treatment Facility Joint Venture and Englewood Police, Fire and on -Emergency Pension Funds ut lso th Housing Authority and the En lewood Downtown Development Authori y. proach is taken to accomplish two goals . The first, t o provid City Government and related entities and; secondly, to impl Audit approach to financial reporting . While these report ar as one document Lt Ls with the intent that these reports ar~ therefor e , "liftable" for special purpose financial repor ing. Gene r al Financial Condition the he pre ented , l'lnd The fina ncial condition of the City on December 31, 1981, gen rally reflects a stable and sound position . Sales tax revenues for 1981 w re 9.1 1 over the esti- mated revenue (as rev ised) and 20 .6% increase over 1980 sales tax revenue. This growth is an indication of the strength of the Englewood economy . This type of growth has also allowed the City 's other tax rates and charges for services , e xcept r ecr eation program charges , to r emain the same . Recreation p r ogram r evenues showed significant growth of 26% as a result of an increase in charges, The increa e in charges wa s a result of a policy decision by City Council to provide 100% cost r ecovery on adult progr ms and 25% recovery on most youth programs. The property tax remains at 6 mills. The Public lmprovem nt Fund (PIF) (Capital Projects Fund) received funds from the General Fund to provid funding for storm drainage projects; and the Golf Cou rs e Fund, from the sale of Use Tax Bonds, to provide supplem ntal funds for the club- house const ruction being completed in PIF. Thes addition l funds coupled with use tax and other fund sources of r evenu for PIF allowed the City to spend or encumbe r $2 .6 million on capital project in 1981 . The Water Fund continu to b in irly healthy financial position even though the lat st rte Lncrea e wa in 197 The Water Fund completed revitalization of its water treatment facility xcept to the extent th wt r tower was not completed a a result of pending litigation. Th s w in rev Th Col Cour c ntlnu in th 9 hole in 19 l ( hlch C n r l Fund contrlbut d -l- n r1ttng suftlcl nt op rt- n11.1ry 1, 1980. Hnwev r, ) which provid d m d velnpment ee in l l. The o th a cond re ult, h positive I • • l I I I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO cash flow for the golf course. Tile Golf Course should begin to become self-sufficient in 1982 except for debt service to be paid by the Public Improvement Fund in 1982 only. Cash not used for operations during the year was pooled and invested in num e r o us forms of investments including certificates of deposit, negotiable certificates of deposit and federal agency securities. For the year, 100% of available cash was invested. Tilis was achieved by the use of flotation of money while the bank wa s still adequately compensated for services. Interest in the amount of $1,238,421 was ea rned which result ed in an annual yield of 13 .25%. General Governmental Functions The General Fund unreserve d fund balance fo r December 1981, was $2,154,838 com- pa r ed to $1,435,688 the previo us year. Tile fund balance for year end 1982 is estimated t o be $1,002,923. Tile City's current policy is to maintain a minimum fund balance of $1,000 ,000 at the close of any year to provide a contingency for either fluctations in the City 's revenues or emergency purchases. Revenues: Rev e nue s in the General Fund totaled $13 ,47 2 ,068 in over the previous fiscal year. General Sales Taxes Fund r evenues compared to 63.7% the previous year. the major sources and differences from the previous tabulation: 1981, an increase of 16 .5% produced 66.0% of the General Tile amount of revenue f r om year are shown in the follo wing lncrea e (Deere se) Amount Per cent over 1980 Revenue Sources (Tilousand of Total (Thou nds) Sales Tax $ 8, 90 6 .0% $ 1 ,523 Other Taxes 2 ,27 1 .9 Licenses nd Permits 3 2.5 151 lntr governmental Rev e nue 436 3 .2 (121) Charges for Service 786 s. 129 Fin s nd Forfeitur s 315 2.3 14 Mi cell n ou R venu 425 ).2 1 5 ---- TOTAL R VE UES $ 13,472 100 .0 $ l 1907 Exp nditur s nd ncumbranc for the C n r l Fund to al d $12,131, 9, n in- er a of 9.8% ov r 1980 xp nditures nd ncumbr nc e total. tn addition, trana- f rs to other und of $621,444 for a t otal mount of exp nditur 1 , nc branc 1 , and tr n1fer1 of $12,752,917. tncrea1e1 in 1 v la of exp nditur • for aajor functtona of th G n ral Fu nd over the previou1 year are 1hown ln the follo wlng t1bul ion: • I • • - • • • • • ANN UAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO Increase (Decreas e ) Amount Percent over 1980 Function (Thousands) of Total (Thousands) ---- General Government $ 2,237 17, 5% $ 309 Public Safety 5,435 42.6 44 2 Publ le Works 2,712 21. 3 655 Culture and Recreation 2,196 17.2 196 Conservation of Natural Resources 114 .9 21 Debt Service 59 .5 0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 12,753 100 .0% $ 1 ,6 23 The sound financial condition of the General Fund is mainly a result of increased revenues over e~penditure by $71 9,151 , Even though the fund balance this year is more than adequate the financial status needs to be con tinually mon itor ed in light of the demand placed upon surplus fund s in the 1982 bud get , wh ich requires the use of $861,293 of thi ur plu for transfers to the Public I mpr ovement Fund (capital projects). D bt Adm inistration The City of ng l ood tssu d three new bonds and entered into one ca pita l lease as follows: Specia 1 As eu ary 1, 1981 for of parkin n ar downt individual property o the legal d bt aargtn -Downtown lmprovem nt District No , 1980-1, Serles Febru- Th purpo e of thee bond issues is the development wn Englewood. The funding source is assessment against the r in the special districts, Tilese bond issues do not affect of th City, Use T x Revenu Bonds -Serl B September 1 , 1981 A and B, Series A $465 ,000 and Series B $1,750,000. The purpose of Series A wa s to supplem nt existing capit l pro j cts fund to provide a municipal golf course clubh ouse . The expected cost of th n w c lubhouse is to b $1,2 million, Series B was issued to finan ce a relief sewer llne l n northea t Englewood to be completed in 1982, It is the City's stated int ntion t o psy d bt ervl c e from the Golf Cour e Fund nd Sew r Fund, Comput e r Lea s -dated Jun 17, 1981 for $242,850. Th purpos o f the leas e l s to pro vid fundin f o r Ph Bet dat proc sln d velopm nt, The City's leg l d bt limit, 3% of assessed valu tton, t y r nd was $4,03 2 ,581 which is the maximum allow bl und r the City's Ho Rul Charter, The City h no gen r l obligation bonds outstanding at Dec mb r 31, 1981, applic ble to th legal d bt limit. Th City c ontlnu lt fin n m in th munlcip l bond m rk t. n, last rating th Clty r c lv d W 8 AA from Standard nd Poor's and Moody's r main tan A-1. Tabl s 8 to 14 in th Stathtlcal ct ton of this report pr ant mor d tall d ln- formation about th d bt poeltlon of th City. -4- • I • • f- • I I [ [ I I I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO Water Fund The Water Fund ha d a decr ease in total revenues of 0.5% compared to the previous fiscal year . The decrease was due to less interest earned on central cash invest- ments as cash availability declined as a resu lt of large capital outlays . Operating revenue increased by 3.21% compared to the previous fiscal year. Comparative data for the last two fiscal years for the Water Fund ls presented in the follo wing tabu- lation: Gross Revenue Tap Fees Total Expenses Total Available for Debt Service Coverage (income available for Debt Service divided by average annual Debt Service) 1981 $2,869,158 130,300 2,999,458 1,629 ,041 $1,370,417 1. 2 198 0 $2,935 ,783 77,800 3,013,583 1,307,876 $1,705,707 1.5 The Water Fund r eflects a working capital increase of $88,044 . This fund should maintain a stable financial position with the possibility of minor rate adjust- ments for the next few years . The future financial status of the Water Fund ls favorable with the potential of generating substantial revenues through the sale of water and tap fees from ne w developments. Sewer Fund Th Sewer Fund revenues increased 33.2% over 1 98 0 . Effecti ve January 1, 1980, sewer rate were increased by approximately 150%. This is a result of increased costs associated with the Bi-City Was tewater Treatment facility . Expenses were up 22% over 1980. Since the Treatment Plant ls operated 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, equip- ment has to be maintained on a r egular b si , requiring large purchases of parts and chemicals used in th treatment process, Th comparative data for the last two fiscal y ars for th Sew r Fund 11 present d in the followin tabul tlon: Groa1 venu Tap Fe 11 Tot l Expen1 • Total Availabl for D bt S rvlc av ilable for D bt -s- 1981 $2 ,608 ,238 859,498 3,467,736 2,705,978 $ 761,758 4.7 • 1980 $2,274,513 _ _128, 589 2,603,102 2,656,007 $ (52,905) (,23) • • Jn • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Debt coverage is affected to the extent that rate increases that were earned at December 31, 1980 were not included in the above computation. The amount of $297,942 represents billed but unearned of the rate increase in which case debt coverage would be 1.04 for 1980. The City presently has a policy requiring all tap fees to be used for Debt Service and certain other costs associated with the Bi-City Treatment Fund, with the e x- cess going into a designated account. This amount of $916,185 is expected t o be used for future plant development. Capital Project Fund (PIF) The City of Englewood continued to have a pay-as-you-go Capital Impro ve me nt Program financed mainly from use tax, revenue s haring funds, and General Fund transf e rs. Dur- ing th e year $2,975,043 was appropriated in the fund as compared to $2,969,543. in 1980 . The current policy is that if additional fund s are available in the General Fund a t year e nd, these fund shall be transferred to th e Capital Projects Fund for specific project • ln 1981, $421,014 wa s transferred from the General Fund to Public Improvement Fund . During 1981 , actual e xp end iture and encumbr ances were $2 ,550 ,376 . The Publi c Improvement Fund had a f und balance of $328 ,363 at year end 1981 . Inte rnal Service Funds The City began operating internal se r vice funds in 1972 . Tilree fun tions are und r this fund -Centr 1 Service , S rviCenter, and Self-In ur nee . The Central Service function handles all office supplie , prlntin, mall, tc., for the City . All d partm nts shar in the cot of this function by th u of charge-backs to th u er . The ServiCenter function, st r ted in 1974 , handles all repairs nd • intenance to City-own ed equipment and vehicles. In 1976 a program w s adopted by th City Council to provide funding for capital equipment replac m nt of vehicl and equipment through the ServiC nter. The Self-In ur nc Fund b g n op ration in 1974 for th ing a portion of th City's mploy b n flt pro r tal. d llablllti a for unfiled cl la S lf-Insur nc Fund w a xpand atonal Llabillty and ln 197 a r rv for "stop a t y ar nd 19 l re $275,000 and $252,793 lat four y rs the S lf-lnaur nc und h d no pr alu lncr a e medical or d nt 1 plans . The pl na h ve wor d w 11 or th City thousands of doll r alnc 1974. P naion Fund Th ln nci l condition o th polic , fir and eploy a p ntion fund ph tlzed on n rou occ alon. Th un und d lt bllitt of th a slant leant flnanct 1 burd non the Cit • • I • • - I I I l I I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO The newest of the three programs, the Employees' Retirement Fund for non-emergency employees, is by far in the best financial position. Established by local ordi- nance in 1969 for January 1, 1970, the plan granted past service credits to all current employees. The following is a summary of actuarial valuations for the pension funds: Actuarial Present Value of Net Assets Available Date of Latest Accumulated Plan Benefits for Plan Benef its Fund Actuarial Valuation Vested Non-Vested Valuation Date Policemen January 1, 1982 $3,622,132 $ 120,776 $1,745,611 Firemen January 1, 1982 3,629,604 53,957 2,772,198 Employees January 1, 1982 1,527,709 133,293 2,715,634 The assumed rates of return used in determining the actuarial present value of assu- mulated plan benefits were 7.5% for the Policemen's and Firemen's Funds, and 6% for the Employees' Fund. Ci ty co ntributions in 1981 amounted to $244,815, $297,786 and $339,984 for the Policemen's, Firemen's and Employees' f und s , respectively . Independent Audit The City Charter requires an annual audit to be made of all City accounts by certified public accountants, the accounting firm of Lehman, Butterwick and Co., P.C., was selected by City Council for 19 1. Tilis annual audit require ment ha been co mp lied with, and the audito r's opinions have b en included in this report. Acknowledge• nt I should like to express my appreciation to all m mb rs of the Fin nee Department for their efficient and dedicated ervlce durin 1981. l would especially like to ackowledge the Assistant Director of Finance for the City who supervised the preparation of this report. A special thanks 11 extend d to the ind pendent certi- fied public ccounting firm for th ir able asistanc and for th professional mann r in whi ch they have handled the audit for th City', financial records. I would lso like to thank your office for th int re1t and 1upport in planning nd conductln th financial oper tion, of th City in a progre,aive and r spon1ible a nner. Rap ct ully sub itted , ~"',,.~~ Cary R. Hi b Dir ctor of Financ /jlw -7- • at I • • - I • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Certificate of Conformance in Financial Reporting Presented to City of Englewood , Colorado For its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31 , 1979 A ert1f1cate of Conformance in Financial Reporting 1 pre nted by the M unicipal Finance Officer A oc1a t1on of the United tate and Canada to governmental unit and public employee retirement system who comprehen 1ve annual f1nanc1al r ports (C AFR 's) r Judged to ub tantlally conform to program tandard ~ Pre sident ~k • I • • J • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT I Fl LEHMAN , BUTTERWICK ., __ ...,._.__. & COMPANY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS • • • The Honora ble Mayor and Members of City Council City of Englewood, Colorado: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO We have examined the combined financ ial statements of the City of Englewood , Colorado , as of and for the year ended December 31 , 1981 ss listed in the accompanying table of contents . Our examination was made in accordance with ge nerally accepted auditing standards , and accordingly included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we consider- ed necessary in the circums tances. The Employees ' Retirement Fund and the Policemen's and Firemen's Pens ion Funds of the City of En~le wood as of and fo r the year end ed December 31, 1981 have not been included in the accompanying com bined financial state- ments. However, we have examined the financial statements of such funds and have issued our report thereon dated March 26, 1982. ln our opinion, the forementioned combined financial statements of th City of Englewood , Colorado, present fairly Lh financial position of the City of En1,lewood at December 31, 19 1, the results of its operations , and Lhe change in finsnci 1 po itlon of its En terprise nd Intern 1 Service Funds for Lh year then ended , in conformity with ~ n r lly a cepted accountin · principles whi ch , exc pt for th ch with ich concur, ln th m thod of recordinb revenu In th sp clal sm nt funds as d scribed in note l to th fin n lal hav ppli d on a ba is consi tent with that of the pr c not haa th all s com- ntal Th cc:011p nylni; 1tathtical lnforua tlon w • not udit d by us, nd c.ccord- inalY w do not xpr •• n opinion on it. L HHA , !SUTTER I ' & C MPANY, P.C. rch 2 , 1 2 NlMA • lli!V fill OIIIAOO I 113 It -10- • I • • - I [ l • l I • I I ........_ • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO general purpose financial statements • I . • • • AN NUAL FI NANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO COMBINED BALANCE SKEET -ALL FUND TYPES AND ACCOUNT GROUPS DECEMBER 31, 1981 WITH COMPARATIVE TOTALS FOR DECEMJIER 31, 1980 ASSETS Cen tral c ash and investments Designated and other cash Accounts receivable Due from other funds Due from Bi-City Joint Venture Due from governments Property taxea receivable leas uncollectibles Miscellaneous receivables Other current assets Inventorlea of material and auppliea Aasessmenta receivable Investment in Bi-City Joint Venture (Note 2) Advances for construction Restricted ca1h and lnveatmenta Property, plant and equil"'ent (net) Amount to be provided for payment of long-term debt LIABILITIES Current in1t1 llment1 of long-term debt (Note 3) Intereot pa yable Account, payable D ferred revenue Due to other fund, Other current liablllti • Bonda payable, includina prealua (Note 3) Capitalized lease obligation, ( ote Mortgage note (. <>U )) Total lie illtlea fU O SALANC!i : Ilea rv d for encl•branrea lluerv d for d bt Hrvice Unreurved UHtl 5) General $2,554,157 1,360 41 ,074 803,871 79,053 $3,479,515 $ 311, 90 80 ), 71 49, 17 _hlh~ 0~ -1 - Governmenta l Fund Typea Revenue Publlc Sharing Improvement (Special (Capital Special ~) Projecta) Aaaeaament $ 983,371 s 854,310 26 2 ,275 40,157 46,200 145,316 378 ,863 2 ,56 4 1,074,764 251, IOI 50,000 $1 ,379 ,788 $1 ,283,173 $ l 14l5 1960 $ s $ I, 761 70 ,644 0 , ~8 92 , 10~ 46,< 0 b,000 1,07 • 00 ~ 21JJ)ii;' 1 , " f, • 1 ,21~) c,.!; l, I fl, 129 • I • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO Fiduciary l![gl):r1 Pt 1rv F!;!nd T:z:ees Fund Malley Ac count Groues I nternal Center General General Total En terprise Se rvice Trust Fixed Long-Term {Memorandum Onll) Funds Funds ~ ~ Debt .!1Lillfil. 12/31/80 $ 2 ,500 ,038 $1,601,317 $6,976 $ $ $ 8,762,444 $ 5,861,878 398,023 25 439,565 130,011 154 ,379 154,379 179 ,311 46,200 132, 700 70,988 70,988 641,737 25 ,554 593,371 450 ,508 803 ,871 813 ,731 12,625 91 ,67 8 100 ,943 6 ,979 6 ,9 79 12,064 115,741 217 ,979 333 ,720 270,192 1,074,764 737,761 11,539,755 11,539,755 10,918,490 368,596 368,596 963,180 1,264,281 2,371,552 32,095 ,891 1,203,154 11,350,471 44,649,516 41,558,702 985,654 985 ,654 628, 94 [ $48 ,244 ,770 p ,029 1 454 $6,976 $11 ,350,471 $9 85 ,654 $71 ,185,761 $64 ,808,074 ---- I 860,000 $ $ $ $ 76 ,508 $ 36,508 $ 768,979 297 ,969 299 ,730 220,730 439,149 53,899 956,240 1,1 l, 752 I, 729,976 1,416,736 [ 46 ,200 132,700 605,317 194,434 875,068 1,405,874 10,419 ,86 7 11,498,667 10,042,622 329 ,996 329,996 579,150 579,150 604,515 l 2,622 ,302 248 , 33) 985 ,654 17,251,535 --.ll,_1Ll...'.!Q,,_ I 11,350,471 11,350,471 10,11>1, n 27 ,710,0)4 l,)IJ,546 29,023,580 27,JJ\,O 7 I 1,066,037 4&),1>)2 ( 09,215) (~07, I • 3 916 368 2 795 ~16 I • • 4,173,190 2,751,879 I 527, 7 ) 527, 793 603, 37' ~ 7 ,912,43 )9,782 1 8,859,192 8, l 1,9 2 8.2 4,770 3 029 45 1hlli II 3\0 4 71 ~ 65 pC1es 1 11,1 64 0 014 -13- • • n - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO COMBINED STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CIIANGES IN UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE REVENUES Taxe1 Intergovernmental revenue Charges fo(' services City contrlbutlona and a11e1amente Other contrl butione Licen1e1 and peralta Fine• and forfeitures Hlace l laneoua OTIIER F!NANClNG SOURCES -TRANSFERS EXPENDITURES General govemaent Public aafety Publ tc work.a Culture and rec.re.at ton Conatructlon Debt aervlce Ht1cellaneou1 OTllER FINANCING USES -TIANSFtllS EXCESS (DEFICIENCY) OF REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOUllCES OVER EXPt.NDITUllES AND OTHER USES ll!Sr.RVE fOl ENC IRANC!S -JANU .UY l RESERVE POil ENC lllANC!S -DEC!HB!ll ll ltSt.lV! POI DEBT SEBVICI!: -DECDllt:ll 31 ALL GOVERNK!NTAL FUND TYPES YEAR ENDED DEC!HI ER ll, l 98 l Revenue Sharing (Special Cenera l hvenue) $11,164,532 435,573 786,100 345,815 315 ,365 424,683 13 ,472,068 2,293,111 5,451,391 2,220,531 2,111,172 621,448 12,697 ,6 53 774,415 104,3)5 (159,599) 606,361 97,322 703,683 10,048 10,048 69),635 Publlc laproveaent (Capital Projec t•) 709, 794 453 ,43) 9,518 611,405 421,014 2,205.164 247,159 279,704 407,226 403,881 697,732 2 ,035,702 169,462 32),291 (837,965) t U: ~RV DP IALANC!S -JANU.UY 1 l,43S, 87 6 ,153 673,576 rn.cT OP CHA.~GU I t,., CO I t 'l E V!D ~ 'D IALAIIC!S -DECI tl ll 18 $1 1 17~ 1 78 32 364 -u- • Malley Ce nter Special Trust A.a1e1aaent Fund 307,843 117,604 505,981 101.1 .. 2 13,338 30 000 (22S,014) ,007 (68,473) 809,215 )B,136 • 6,725 251 Total __ (Memor~_Qn__ly) December 31, Oecem>er31 -~--~- $11,874 ,326 1,495,36 7 786,100 307,843 16,243 345 ,815 315,365 1,251,265 421,014 $16,813,338 2,550,318 5,731,095 2.627,757 2,515,053 1,203,713 101,142 13, ]38 651,448 l 5,393,864 1,419,474 463,6)3 (1,066,037) 809,215 3,148,5)2 $10,24l ,l48 1,799,))2 657,084 547,000 96,000 195,112 J00,536 655,413 80,000 14 571 ns I • • In - . z - • • • . . • ANNUAL FI NANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO COl!BlNED STATEMENT OF IEV!MUES, EXP!NDITUIES, Allll ENCUIIBllANC!S Allll CHANCES IN FUND IALAM C!S -IUDG!T AllD ACTUAL ALL IUDC!T!D COVIUIIEIITAL FUlll> TYUS FOi TH! U,il Dl>!D D!C!llll!l ll, 1981 llEV!MU!S Taxes Licenses and perait1 Inte rgovernmental Charge, for 1ervlc e1 finea and fo r feitu res Mi acellaneoue Total revenue, EllP!NDlTUllES AIID !NCUKIIAIIIC!S Gener at government Publlc safety Publlc work.a Cul ture and recreation Coaauni ty deve lopaent Star• dra lnage Debt aervlce Total 1xp1:n.dlture1 llevenue1 over(uoder) 1xp1ndltun:1 OTilEl rlNAN Cl NC SOUIC!S (USES) -TIAl!SF!IS levenuea ov1 r(under) e xpendltur,a and other aourcea (uae.1) Pl/ND 11.\LAMC! -JAIIUAIY l llE ~RV! fOI EN lllANCZ S -D!C!Klel ll FUND IALAIICl!S -D!C!Kl!I ll General Fund ludaet ~ $10,356,710 $11 ,164,532 207,118 345 ,81 5 489,402 435,573 650,895 786,100 282 ,300 315,365 155,700 424 ,68 3 12,142,125 13 ,472,068 1,904,496 1,864 ,877 5,478,322 5,434 ,715 2,336,220 2,191,236 2 ,143,207 2,096,113 497,643 485,808 58,720 58,720 12,418,608 12,131,469 (276 ,483 ) 1,340,599 (621,448) (621 ,448) (897,931) 719,151 1 ,435 ,687 1 ,4 35 ,68 7 537,756 2,154,838 159 ,599 537,756 $ 2 ,314 ,437 Actual 0.er ( Uade r) ludaet 807,822 138 ,697 (53 ,D2S) 135,205 33 ,065 268 ,983 1,329 ,943 (39 ,61 9) (43,607) (144,984) {47,094 ) (11 ,835) !287, 139) 1,617,082 1,617,0 2 1 ,61 7,082 159 ,5 9 $1 ,776 ,681 !!!!..._•c .. co an in oot11 are an tnte ral rt of thl1 1tat1•nt. -16- • • 8ud1,et $ 755,120 47,000 802,120 26 ,727 26,727 775 ,393 775 ,393 53 373 1,311, 76 $1 ,lll ,76 Re.venue Sharing Actual Over(Unde r) ~-- 606 ,36 1 (148,759) 97 1 322 703.iil 10,048 (16,679) 10,048 (16 ,679) 693,635 (81,758) 149,780 149,780 843,415 8,022 ~3 1,379 ,788 68,022 $1,379,788 ;,68 022 I • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO I I Public !!l!rov-ot !Ca~ital ~ecu) Total• Q!!aorandua Onl~l I Act Ac tu.al Over (Under) Over(Uoder) Bud&et ~ lud&et audaet ~ Budget ' 680,310 $ 709,794 $ 29,484 $ll,037 ,020 $ll,874,326 $ 837,306 207, ll8 345,815 138,697 537,144 453,433 (83,7ll) I, 781,666 1,495,367 (286,299) 650,895 786, IOO 135,205 282,300 315,365 33,065 663,000 620,923 (42 ,077) 865,700 1,142,928 277,228 1,880,454 1,784,150 (96 ,304 ) 14,824,699 15,959,901 l, 135,202 l, 149,817 974,830 (174,987) 3,081,040 2,849,755 (231 ,285 ) 80,557 80,767 210 5,558,879 5,515,482 (43,397) 500,002 389,914 (110,088) 2,836,222 2,581,150 (255,072) 460,769 353,325 (107,444) 2,603,976 2,449,438 (154,538) 497,643 485,808 (11,835) 783,898 751,540 (32,358) 783,898 751,540 (32,358) 2,975,043 2,550,376 !•U,667) 58,720 B,4:io,J7ii 58,720 1i,6§1,H3 11n,m> (1,094,589) (766,226) )28,363 (595,679) 1,268,008 1,863,687 421,014 271 ,234 199,506 poo ,4l4 l (200,04) (673,575) (494,922) 178,583 (796, ll3) 1,067 ,S74 1,863,687 _!ll,356 823,356 2,795,416 2,795,416 149,781 328,364 178,583 1,999,303 l,862,990 1,863,687 8}7,962 BP,~l 997,564 99 7 ,564 s 149,781 $1 ,166,329 $1 ,016 ,548 ! 1,999,303 f4,860,5S4 2 ,861,251 • I • -17- • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO COKBINED STAT!IWIT OF llEV!NU!S, EXPENSES, AND CHANGES IN RETAlN~D EARNINGS ALL PIOPl.lETilY FUND TYPES OPERATING Rl!V!.c.cNU.=!ccS _______ _ Charge• for eervlcea 1111 lng1 to department• Self-ln1urance billin11 OPERATING EXP!NS!S lnaurance ctaiu and preaiuaa Operation,. e&eludlna depreciation Depree lat Lon Ill Fa<>M OPEIATIOIIS OTIIER IN (!lP!NS!) ~rntn11 on tnveatMnta tntereat eKpen11 Hta celtaneoua NET INCOH! RETAINED EARNINGS -JAJIUARY l CKANG!S IN BOND 1£S!lV!S (NET) Rl!TAIN!D !AIUIINGS -D!C!IGEI ll • ~acco T?.il !lfD!D D!C!IG!a 31, 1981 !nterpriae Pu.nd1 $5,096,235 5 ,096,235 4,067,749 713,323 4,781 ,072 315,163 481,811 (659,156) 248 ,850 71,505 386,668 7,442,766 83,000 $7,912 ,434 -18- • Internal Service Funda $ I, 190,255 653,576 1,843,83 1 737,849 830,820 249,142 1,817,811 26,020 167,103 7 433 174,536 200,m 739 ,226 939,782 I • • - I I I I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO COMBINED STATEMENT OF llBVl!!lll!S, EXPENDITURES AND ENCUMBRANCES BUDGET AND ACTUAL l!IITERPRIS! FUIIDS FO R THE YEAll EIIDl!D D!C!Mll!R 31, 1981 1981 Actual Over (Under) Budget Actual Budget Budget REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES : Uaer charges $5,507, IOO $5,745,141 $ 238,041 $5,428,015 Syatea developaent fee• 1,062,000 989,798 (72,202) 1,097,000 Bi-City contrlbutiona 85,000 85,412 412 Bond proceeds 1,600,000 2,215 ,000 615 ,000 Tota 1 -revanuea ~8,254,100 ~9 ,035, 351 781 ,251 ~6 ,525 ,015 EXPENDITURES: Operation•, esclucUna dopreclatlon $4,118,633 $4,107,887 $ (10,746) $6,279,090 Cepltal outlay 3,524,475 2,672,431 (852,044) 572,385 Debt 1ervice 1,339,200 1,339,199 (1) 889,532 Total expendltureo $8,982,308 ~8,119,517 $(86 2 ,791) PI 741 ,007 The acco a In aotea are •• Sat e ra l rt of th.ta 1tat1Mat. •l • • 1980 Ac tual Ove r (U n der) ~ Bu d ge t $5,483,107 $ 55 ,092 406,389 (690,6 11 ) 197 ,466 197 ,466 ~6,086,96 2 ~ (438 ,053) $3,7 16,455 $(2 ,562,635) 1,026,31 7 453 ,932 1,307,258 41 7 ,726 ~6 1 050 1 030 $(1,690 ,977) I • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO COMBINED STATEMENT OF CIIANCES IN FINANCIAL POS!TlON ALL PROPRI!TAI\Y FUND TYPES YEAR E!IDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 SOU RCES OF WORUNG CAPITAL Net 1 ncome ltelU not requtrlng (providing) working capital Deprec1atlon Abandonment of utility plant Cain on eale of equtpaent Working capital provided by operation• lncre111e 1n reaervea Proceeds from aale of bonda Proceed• from disposition of fixed aa,eta Contribut ions System development fees Total source, of working capital USES or WORKING CAPITAL Advartce for conatruction Addltiont to plant and equipment lleductlon1 in long-tera debt Inveataent in Ii-City Joint Venture locreaae ln reatrlcted caah Total u1e1 of working capital I N ! (D!CU:AS!) IN RUNG CAPITAL WO ING CAPITAL -JANUARY 1 WOUIN G CAPITAL (DEFICIT) -DtC!:HB!R 31 INCR!:AS! (D!C AS B) IN WOU.ING CAPITAL UPU:S!NTED IY Iner•••• (decrea11) tn. cur r•n t a,,,.ta Caoh [~ lecelvable• Due fro• other aover n .. ntt Ou* fro• It.City Joint Ventur In v ntorl•• Prepat t lr1•u r 11 blltlltt n -tera ebt I Ol a . 4 11 -C ltJ Jo\ nt Veoture 0 h r -20- Enterprise Funds 386 ,668 713,323 434 !1 1l!il ,4B 2,215,000 $ 598,714 989,798 4,9D3,93 1 368,596 2,486,400 878,769 878,240 963,180 575 185 (671 ,248) 29 ,988 !64 1,260) 1 1~.000 2 ,01 l , )) 10 ,20 • '. Interna l ~e_!:.v i ce Fund s 200 ,556 249 ,14 3 (7 ,1 33) ~~ 7 ,418 13 ,885 100,000 563,869 128,472 128 ,472 4n, 39 1 I , 142 ,57 I $1,577,968 $ 4) ,1 \0 (' ,794 ) ,. I I • • - I • I I I I • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLO RADO CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NOTES TO FlNANClAL STATEMENTS December 31, 1981 (1) Summary of S1gn1f1cant Ac countlng Poltcie1 The ac.countlng pollclee of the City of Englewood conform to generally a cce pted accountlng principles as applicable to governmental unit•. Following 11 a au...ary of the aore significant policlea: Fund~~ The accounts of the Ci ty are organized on the baaia of funds or a ccount groups, each of whic h is c onaldered to be a aeparate acc ountlng entity. The operation, of each fund are a ccounted for by providing a aeparate aet of aelf-balanclng accounta vhich comprlae ita a1aet1, ltabill ti ea, re1ervea, fund balance, revenue.a and urpenditurea. The following fund typea and a ccount gt:oupa are uaed by the Clty: Covernaenta 1 Fund• The General Fund -to a ccount for all fin.ancial re1ourcea except t hoae required t o be accounted for tn another fund. Special Revenue Fund -to acc ount for the proceed, of 1peclf i c revenue 1ource1 (other than apeclal a11ea1aenta or for u jo r c apital project&) that are legally reatri c t ed t o expendi- ture for apec lfied purpo1ea. At preaent, the only 1peclal revenue fund 11 u1ed to account for 1ederal l.evenue Sharing. Capital Project• (Public Iaproveaent) Pund -t o account for flnanclal re1ource1 to b e uaed for the acqut11t1on or conatruction of ujor capital fac111t1e1 (other than thou: fi- nanc•d by proprl•tary fund, or apecial a11e11Hnt fund1). Special A11 e1IM'Qt Funds -to a ccount for the financin& of public 1aproveae.nta or 1ervtce1 deeaed to benefit the propertlee aga inet which apecial a1ae11aent 1 ar e levied. Proprietary Funda tnterpri1e Pund1 -to account for operation, that are finance.d and operated in • unner atmilar to private bualne11 enterpr he.1 where the intent of the aove rntna dy le that th co1t1 (expen1e1, tncludtna depreciation) of providing aooda or eer•icea to the aeneral public on a continuing baaia b4 fi nanced or recovered prlMrily throuah uaer char ea. Internal Service Fund • -to a ccount for the flnanctn1 of ood1 or 1ervtce1 provided by one departaent or agency to other departM:nta or • encl•• of the 1ovet11Mnt•l unit on • coat retabur1eeent ba1i1. rt due lary Fund Tru1t Fund -to account for aeeet1 held by the City ln • tru1tee capacity. At preaent, the only tru1t fund 11 the Kalley Cent•r Truet rund (an expend.able tru1t fund). whic h ta u d to 1ccount for aonie1 held by the City •• try,1tee for the aenlor c1t 1tene recreation cente r n "" •• the ·111te Kalley Centennial Center•. Ct'OUP t ccount a C.nerol Fla d f.ueta -to account for ill flHd uHto of tho Clty oot 1ccountod for In th proprietary fund,, C«neral Loa -Tera O.bt -to account for all unaatured lona-tera indebted •• not a ccounted for In tho proprlot1ry or 1,-clal UHH nt fund,. laet, of GCounttn ~dtffad a ccr...al b11l1 of accountln& ll followed for th. o•ar nr1l fued1 ( on rel, IIHI Cl1I r1._,i1nu1, capital tapro¥t nt, and 1pecl1l 1t1111Mnt). and the truat fund. Unt•r thla Mthod, ••p•ndttut'et, other than tnt1re1t on lona-t•r• debt. 1r1 record d whe n tM UabUity 11 Incurred, ucopt for unutured loraraot on 1p<1clal UHIIMftt lnd1btedno11 11curod by lotorut-burlo1 IIH'Clol ••••• Mnt \1vt11 1 and r1v1nM:t art recorded when r1c1tv1d 1ft ceah. unl111 1u•c1ptible to a cc rual, l,e., .. 11ur1llll end .. lllabl• to flnuce th• City'• op<1r1tlol\1. Slaolftcaa ••v•o...a eourcu la th• ao•ar nul f110 • contld•r.d eot to IHI ,111ceptlllle ti • crud l11Clu4e .. , .. • d 111a tn •• e t rett, t1a. \lt•n • 1ft peratte, cl\ara , for Nr¥l ce1, • ftu1 aa41 forf•ltwr,1. TM a ce r al i.ute 11 foll d lly t proprietary f11nd1. -21- • I • • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Encumbrances CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NOTES TO f!NANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 1981 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO ---Encumbrance accounting is e.11ployed by the gove ruen tal funds . Under thJs method, purc hase orde rs, contract8 and other conialtment 1 for the future e xpe ndi tur e o f f unds are r ecorded as a reservation of fund balance baae d on the encumbered appropriation authori t y ca rri e d over . aod do not c onat1tut~ expe nd! tu rea o r U abll it 1 ea . lnvestae.nta ---lnvestiaenta are stated at coat, wh ich approximates aarket. lnvent o dea ---ln~oriea conalst of material and supplies used in the course of operations and are stated at cos t (ftr1t in-firat out baela). !.!£f_e_!:..t..l....!.!.! Property taxes are levied by Nov e mber of each year, and are due in full the following year. Pro perty taxes are collected by Arapahoe Cou nty and then remitted to the City. Such taxes are in l.tially recorded as a recei vable and deferred revenue, and subsequently recogn ized as revenue when ude available to the City . ~e_rt Plant and !quipaent -!nterprl.ae and Internal Service Funds_ Property I plant and equipment owned by the proprietary funds is stated at cost or es tiaated cost . Depreciation ha& been provi ded over the estiuted uaeful lives u al.ng the straight-line me thod . A au'lll'l&ry of depreciable lives by aa jor asset cla11ificatlon 1 1 aa follova : Water distribution ayate• 50 years Sewage collect ion sys tea 50 yeara Water t r eataent plant 50 year a Sewage treatment plant 50 yea r , Rav water se r v i ce faci l i tiea 15-50 years Treated water storage 15-50 yea r 11 Bulldlnga 50 years Vehtcha 2-15 year, Machinery and equt pa1ent 2-25 years ~lal Aee eaaae.nt Fund Deft c it1 The act:ountlng for a11es11aent11 ret:elvable has been change d ln 1981 ln coapllance wi th the requ treaent1 of Covernaental AccountJn I Auditln , and Financial Re~rting. Accordingly , the cumulative effect ot ~change o n f und balance at January 1 1 1981 1 ta I own in the a ccoapany1ng coablned 1tatement of rev•nu ,. expenditure•, and cha nges ln unre1erved fund balance -all governmental fund types . The def l c lta of 1p c lal aaaessment fund• arl•• becauae of the application of generally a ccepted account1"1 principle• to the financial reporting for auch fund,. Although llabllttif'e for 1peclal a•• 1 Mnt bond• payable are accounted for tn apecial aaaea1aent fund,, bond proceed, uaed to finance c onat ruct l on of apectal 1ae11aent project, are not recognized aa an "'o ther finan cin aource". p cial a, f'I aentl are re ... -oanhe:d •• revenue onlv to the extent that lndl.vtdual inllall•nt:1 are cona t dered currt1nt a11e:t a . Th• detlcita of theaa fund, vlll be reduced and ellalnated aa def e t"r e d 1p c tal ••••••- aenta ln1tallNnt1 Ncoae cu rrent a11et1. G.en ra l Fl x•d A11•l Gener f flX-.d--11et1 have b en acqut r ed for gen rat o vernaental pu rpo1e1. As lf't purt:ha t!!d ar• r - t:o r ,ted •• •xpt.•ndlturi-1 prl•arlh tn tht: C.nPrat fund o r the Capital Pro\ecta Fund. and are rapltalluid al coat ln th C•n r 1 Flxtd Aa eta Croup of At:eounta. In the c a1• of glft1 o r cont rlbutt on • auch a11 t ire r•C'ord in C n rat rt xed A.a eta at fair urket value at the tis r eceived . Fix•d I et• t: n1i1tin1 of c•rt in taproveaent• other than bulldina1 1 lncluding road,, bridge,, c ur , and autter,. etreeta and it.dew lka, dralnage 1y1tea1 1 and liahttna 1y1te•• have not been c pit liutd. 'Such •• eta norMlly are i.-ovable nd of valu only to th Ci ty; therefore, the purpo••• of 1tew1rd1hip tor c•p ltal utpandltur•• are 1ati1fi1d wlthoot rec.ordln& th••• a11eca. o dtprei.:. iat tnn i • pl'!Jv lded on aene ra t f i aed 1111t1. L•av, ·,i c lL leave are reco rd d ea expenditure, w n uaed r ,1t her thin at th tlM the l• ve la t-C'11eul1ted. At D•c:••b•r 31, l 1, the unua d vacation eod 1lt:k. leave aounted t o approalute ly S\01,710 and $1,201,\11, rHpectlv ly. Sick luvo .. y roducod by on of throe .. thodo: l) u• a•; l) llq,1ldtt od at I ho r for 4 houro of 1<cU11ulatod olck ltnt for up to r,o h uro In ony yur; 3) 11f\lll at d at 1 hc,ur r r 2 hour, nr a cr oJaulated 1tck laav, at t rat nat l o n or t•t11' unt. -22- • I • • - l. I I I "'-" I I I • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Reserves CITY OF ENGL!WOOD NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Deceaber 31, 1981 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO ---Re8ervea r e present those portions of fund balance not appropriable for future expc"?n dlture o r wh l c h are legally segregated for a apeciflc f ut ure uae . The principle rese rves, o tht!:r than for encumbrances, ln the accompanying financial stat ements are as follows : Reserve for "Sto p Losa .. Reserve for police professional liability RETAIMED EARNIN GS $ 252,793 275,000 S27, 793 Rese rves have not been provided for legally restricted aaset1 related to sewer bond issue s beca use the se..,er fund has no retained earnings. However, 1uc h asset• have been appropriately reatri c ted in the accompanying balance sheet. l.eserve for "Stop Loss " -the reaerve for "Stop Loaa " waa e1tabllahed to cover the differe ntial between the total of projected income for the year and the "Stop Loae'" attachment point. The "S top Loss" atta ch- ment polnt is the polnt at wh ich the Clty ceaee1 to be eelf-ln1ured for aajor med ical and de ntal c laims (presently $841,777) and such clalal beco• covered throuah an lnaurance company. Reaerve for Police Profeealonal Liability -The City Counci l ha1 authorized tranafe ra from the Ge ne ral Fund to eatabll1h 1elf-in1urance to cover poli ceaena' professional liability, whic h ia liaited t o a total statutory liability of $300,000 for any one occurrence. Reserve for Debt Service -the reaerve for debt service was establlshed to identify and r ea trlct the porti o n of the fund balance required for payment of general long-term debt princ ipal maturlng t n future years . l.efunde d Bonda --The Clty ha• e ntered lnt o refunding tran1ac tion1 whereby Tefundlng bonds have been laaue d t o fa c illtate the retireaent of the City'a obligation with r es pect to certain bond i11uea a l r eady o ut1t ndlng. The proceed• of the refunding iaauea have been placed ln irrevocable eacrow account• and tnv 1ted in U.S . Treaa ury obl lgatlona that, together with totereet earned thereon, vlll provide aaounta 1ufflcient fo r futur e payaent of lntereat and principal on the ilauea b ing Tefunded. Refunded bonda a re not included 1n the City', outstanding long-tera d bt alnc e the City legally 1att1fled 1ta obli aa tlon with respec t thereto through cone uaaatl o n of the refunding tr1naaction deac ribed here in. M y ga in o r 101• on re - fundings la recognized i n the period in whi c h the refundin occura. &~t-.t•Q::.!.!n~_e.!_8 The Ctty adopts an nnual budget for e a ch of its funda, except internal ervice, p ct l aaes ~nt funda, 'ind trust funds. tn Septeaber of each year for the following c-alenda r ye-ar. lud11 ta are pre - rarP.d on the saae aals a that uae-d for a ccoun ins purpoa•• except a f ollow (1) t•p•ndlturu for budgetary purpon1 Include 1ncuabranc11. (2) !nterprlae fund Include dtbt aervtce and c apital e -.:JM1ndlture1 nd •• l for budaPt purpoae,. d411:pr c lat Ion App (o111l of the Clty Counc l l ll required for bud et revlalon1, e a.cept tha the CttJ ~naa r uy tran - fer ny un ncwab rid approprlatlon froe one e xpendlt'-lre claaaiflcat i n to anoth r vlthtn th• a ae d p eenr. office , or agency. Acco rdlnaly, th Ctty con1ld1r1 exp ndltur a coapared to approprlatlon1 fr an enti re depart• nt o r fund to an appropriate buda•t coaparl1on o r purpo111 of d ter111ntn wh ther Jeg 1 11lola ton xlat1. llowever , for financial reporttna purpo••• th bud11t COtl rt1on1 have b•en •1.de for depart nt dlvt11on1 t o p1r11lt deta iled analy1l1. Un•ncuabtrtd pproprtatlona lap e at the elo11 of th• cal ndar year. Coapor t tfvt-0 t ·-Coar, r th data for tht. prior ye r ha1 b n pret nt•d ln c rtatn of th IC'ro• ntl to rrovtde n vndttrat ndtna or ch n 11 in th Ctty'1 tin nc-tal poaht,1n a «>wplet c wper tlv deta (Lo. pre nt tl on of prior ytor total• by fund tyr ) ha ln each of the 1tateaent1 1lnce th1Jr lnclu1ion would .. • the 1t1ttMft.1 unduly c: t~ r 1'1. C rtaln 1 cro unt1 relattn to 19 0 have bttn recl•••t f led to confona to tur reftt tlon. -23- nthl •Utt - n. Hl}wvr, *'" pre•t·nt d and dllClcult year pr ••nta- rt · I • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO CITY OF ENGLEWOOD NOTES TO FlNAIIClAL STATEIIENTS De c eaber 31, 1981 (2) Lnvest...ent in Bl-C ity Joint Venture The City participat es in a Joint venture with the City of Littleton, fonne.d fo r the construC't lon and opt:ratton of a wa stewate r trea tment fac LJ lty. Federal and s tate grants to the c ities provided approximately 5'>% and 25% of cons tr uct i on cos t s , respect ively . The j oint venture.re provided funds for the r emaJntng costs ln equal propo rt ions. 111e ci ties ' s hare of operat ing expenses , excluding deprec iatio n, ls based upon budgeted usage of the facility. The City 's i nves tment in the joint venture has been r educed by the City's share of the j o int venture n e t o v~rating loss, which repre sents 50% of the depreciation of the fac11 lty. (3) Bonds P aynble and Hon ~ Note B,onds payable and mortgage note at December 31 , 1981, a r e coapdsed of the fol lowing i.ssue1;: T .I!! GF.NERAL OBLICATI ON BONDS Refundlng water 1978 Waler 1980 Tou 1 genera\ obl t 111.tton bonds REVENUE BO!IDS AnnWl lly-1997 Annually-1989 Refund in ,ewer re>1enue 1976 Annual ly-1990 Uae t 1u. revenu : Serlea 1981 A (Golf Course) Serlu 1981 a (Sever) Total revenue nds SPEC IA L A SES E Pavln~ Oiltr1ct 122 Paving Dtatrlct 124 Pavtn1 Dt1trict '2S P vtng Dtatrtct 12 North and South P vln1 Dt1trtct 127 nt n leprove.aent Diltric:t No. 19 0-1 Tou l 1pecia 1 •• eaa- Mnt b<>nds >i<>lT~A~ 1 ~ TAI !."ENT ~OTl Ctty llal l prop~rty Annu&ll y-199 1 Annually-1991 June, 1986 June , 1987 June, 1989 June, 1990 Au uat 1 1990 Au Ult• 1992 Der•• r, 1997 lnter at ~- 61 6. 6-8. 01 5. 7-6.251 10. 25-121 10. 25-121 6. 25-6. 751 5.251 4.6-5.31 12l 7-st 11-11 . 91 5.h251 Out1tanding Januar y 1 1 1981 $ 7 ,305 ,000 l , 300,000 l, 121,000 ~o lS0,000 10,000 l 1,000 100,600 297, l ----- 951lll A 1uaMrJ of r•fund d hau•• •• ut Otu· • r ll, 1 1 foll 1 1 • I fundtn aur, 191'\ Mou1ln1 l•fundln&, 1976 R.efundlna Waur. 1961\ W•Ur l•prnv Mnt, 1971 V•t•r Ieprovewnt, 1978 S1 wet •veno • 1971\ Houoln&, 1976 l 11ued In 1981 Retiu.d In 1981 $ 640,000 " 10,000 6SO,OD0 4 S,000 1 7)0 000 2,2n,ooo • 1, 29S,ooo I, 7,000 6 0,000 JS,000 6,120.000 1,100,000 1,0IS ,000 95,000 95,-000 )0,000 5,0')() 7,000 19,600 IS7,l 98& 2). 979 Outstand ing Oeceaber )1 1 1981 6,665,000 1,290,000 7 9H DOG_ 1,026,000 65,000 _.!.,7~0,000 -1.,241 Q.0.2. 120,oon 2S,OOO )1 ,000 1,000 1'0,000 )9 800 1,«pe 800 0 ,H5 il2,!!!,].!S Due tn 1982_ $670,000 10 ,000 680,000 100,000 lS,000 65,~ 180 ,000 2S, lb• I • • f I I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLOR ADO Cl TY OF ENGLEWOOD NOTES TO FI NAN ClAL STATEMENTS Deceaber 31 , 1981 (4) Pendon Funds ~eCtty contributes to separate pension funds covering policeaen, fi remen, and other City eaployee&. ('\) L., 1 ThP fol l owing is a summary of a c tuarial valuations for theae pension funds: Actuarial Preat1nt Value of Net As se ts Availabl e Date of Latest Accuaulated Plan Benefits for Plan Benef t t s al 1-_u~ Actuarial Valuati on ~d ~d Valuation _Da_t..!_ Pol t ceaen Janua r y l, 1982 J,622, 1)2 120,776 1,74S,611 f't re.en J anuary l , 1982 J,629,604 5),957 2,772,198 £11ployces J anuary 1, 1982 l, 527,709 lJJ, 29) 2, 71 5 ,6)4 The 111suaed rates of return used ln deteratnlng the a c tuarial present value of accumulated plan be nefits were 7.~% fo r the Policemen's and Ptreaen'a Funds, and 61 for the Employees' Fund . City conu lbuttona tn 1981 amounted to $244,815, $297,786 and $339,984 for the Polt ceaPn's, Ftreaen'1 and Eaployees ' funds, reapectlvely. Tht Ftrat N•tlonal Bank of Englewood h truatee. for all of thea pension funds. Annual contr ibutions to the Poltceaen'a and Ftreaen'a funda by the employer, e11ployee and the Seate of Colorado are not l eaa than the normal coat of the statutory and bene.ftt funds plu1 the unfunded past 1ervt ce coat of th bene- fit fund1 •110rthed over • 40-year period . Pol1ceaen'1 and Flreaen'a Pension funda have been funded in a cco rdance with IUte atatutea. Annual contributi on, to the Eaployeea' fund are not leaa than nonaal coat plua the unfunded past aervice coat aaortized ove r a ten year period. The plan ia currently funded aolely froa City contrt- u t t on,. tate l v, effectivti? Janu.1rv 1. 1980, c t'eated an w ret1reaent benefit plan for policeaen and flrea e n hired on or Afte r Aprll 8, 1978: created • n"' death and dhability benef it plan for poltceae.n and Cire- aen, reaardleaa of th• tiae they were hired : and Ct'eated a a ute fire and pollceaen pe.nalon aesoc latlon tr, 1datnht r the new plan, and perfor• ce rtaln other functions rtlatlng to pollc•aen'a and fireaen 'a p n t ,n • The•ta t • •••oc.tat.ion will deteratne ruture contribtuto n 1 to th• r ett r aent plan. The State f'lf Colorado will C'on trtbute l'@ rtaln aaounta t o •llocated betv en th r eti reaent and death and dh .. a tltty plane. and all prevlnua atate c.on trtbutt o n foraul • have been t ratnated. Po ltceaen and flre .. n Mr•d • r r_. Arrtl , 1<nA u y volunta rtt, •••od ate wtth th• np~ retire•nt plan under ce rta tn c\r(Ia"U"l r, whih· thn • hired 1fter Apr ll 8, 197 re auto .. tic:ally a11oc lated v tth th ne.., r tire- rt rt n, l 1r.1tt.atnta Le,1 ~~ c-t .... l\tlt ln 1 dt p rr•lt of lanJ cu rrentl y occuph,d ) .a"J th " rvlC'f'nff•r ( pt'Utln~ l ;-. ) and • caplul le••,. for c r nth under th e pttal 1 .. nd I•• •, which ••Pirf't tn ~uh, t purctui • thta lanJ 111 "41irrh. 1 0, tor appr,wtut. lY S2b't, 1 • r•r1ba 11U-v t t th• ru, wtll •• r r1•• ha ptto", tM I of tl'J' ,.:.1 1 tn th u ~c,,apanyin " • tn d ahn • ah,. L th ,,.,lice .. ftre r.ent.r· (C'apltal l•a• ) p11t•r PqutP1Wnt. Tl rtcy pay• $1.1 ?00\. How yr, th Cily haa an npflon (S2.~0 pttr •qu.re foot). c uat11 uf t bt>•n t'aptull&ed tn ,t,. U'll Th• rott,w1n pr,, nt "alue a •rh duh hy year• of futur atntaua 1 • pa.,..fttl "nder capital h•••• nd th t t n t •lntau• l •••• payaent, 11 '>l D4h:e•bf'r 1, 1 1: Land Y ar ,idln lAtH' , er Tor,1 .,,,, .. wr,t Ina lnt ertat . .. -25- • SI , 77 \1,817 48, I I ,41 , 719 To, al 111,971 ~\,011 hi. Ill \1, I~ n. ,1, -..!!! u I • • - • • ANNUAL FI NAN CIAL REPORT • • •' I • Cl TY OF ENGLEWOOD NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Deceabe:r ll, 1981 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO The Servicenter lease glvee the City the option to purchaae the pre•11es under the same t e r•a as offered by any other purchaaer. The leaae e•pire1 on Karch 31, 2004, but 18 renewabl e for a further ter11 of 35 years under the current terae. A su ... ry of lease pay..ents foll o ws : Year ending De c e•ber ll (6) Contingent Lia bilttlea 1982 198] 1984 1985 1986 Subaequent years 6,000 6,000 6 ,000 6.000 6,000 lDl,500 Lll1,500 A nuabe.r of cla i•• are preaently pending aaainat the Ctty, but City u.nageaent belie ves that flnal 1ettle•nt of theae utura vtll not .. certally affect the flnanc lal atateaents of the City . The City receives revenuea fro• varloua federal and atate grant prograaa, which are sub ject to fin.al review and approval •• to allowabiltty by the re1pec tive grantor agenc l e1 • -2 - • l I • • n - • ( L I I ' I r • • • '. ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO governmental funds combining and individual fund financial statements • I . . - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO GtNERAL l'UND ST AT EMEN T Of REVEN UES , EXPENDITURES, AND ENCUKJIRANCES AND CHANGES IN UNRESERVED FUND BALAN CE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL YEAlt ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 REVENUES: TAXES Property tax Speclflc ownerahtp tax Salee and u1e tax Cigarette tax Utt lithe Total t.axea LICENSES AND PERMITS Bu1tnea1 ltcenaea and peralt1 Bui ldtna ltcenaet and peralta Total ltcenaea and peralta INTERGOVERNIIENTAL UVENUE Revenue 1harlng Federal grant• State ah.ared revenue Total tnteraovernaental revenue CH AltGES FOR SERVICES Cener11 l aovernaent Publ t c 1afety Htahvay and atreet Al'liul 1helter Debrh reao..,al School Dhtrlc t Mo. lee re.at ton prograa Li brary Total c har&•• !or 1ervtce1 FINES AND YO Rl'EITUUS Court rlnt:1 Li brary fine, Total flne1 and fortelture1 H!SC!LLANEOUS U:VE E lntereat on lnYelted ful\dt Hlacel lan•oue Total •tacell aMoua revenue Tota\ revenue, E1tluted Revenue.a (M lev!Hd) 8 20 ,710 6S,000 8,143,000 SIS,000 81 3 ,000 10 1 lS6 1 710 111,940 9S 1 l 78 207, I 18 23,727 48, 6 7S 417.000 489' 402 361,020 7 ,700 4 7, JlS 30,630 10,000 IS4,910 39 300 ----iis0 .89S 100 ,000 ss 700 IH 700 U2 .142.12S -28- Actual ~ 819,492 73,92S 8,890,38 3 S61,719 819,013 ll,164,Sl2 I IS,839 229,976 34S,815 7 ,648 427 1 92S 4)),S73 4S0 ,198 S ,4S6 44,794 2S, 96 7 2 ,832 10,000 2 10,089 36. 764 786.100 303,430 11 93 ~ 31S ,365 294,28) 130 400 424 6SJ $13 1 472,06 • Actual Over (Under) Eat lmated (I, 218) 8,92 S 747 ,38 3 46, 719 ___ 6.Q!l 807,8 22 3,899 134,798 138,697 (16,07 9) (48,67S) 10 1 9 2S {5 3,829) 89 , I 78 (2,244) (2,S41) (4,663) 2,8)2 SS, 179 llS 1 20S 33,8)0 l76S) H. s 194,28) 74 700 268,98 ) il ,329. 4) I • • l I I ' • • • • ANNUA L FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO GENER.AL FUND STATEMENT Of 11.BVENUF.S, EXPENDITURES, AND ENCUMBRANCES AND CHANGES IN UNRESERVED FUND RA LAN CE - BUDCET AND ACTUAL YEAR ENDED D£CEH1£R ll, 1981 (cont lnU4!d) EXPEND1TUl£S AND EHCUN.BRANCES: LEC1SLAT1Vt AND COUNSEL City Counctl Board or AdJu•t•enta and App eah Board of C.reer Service Planning and Zoning Co -h•lon Library Board Cl ty At torney Total ltghlattve and eounHl AttUMISTRATION City H.an.a1er taployH rehtlona Treasury and record Aceounttn1 a::1d 1udlttn1 llevenue Purchtiatn1 Data proc:eating Total adalintnntlon KUlft CtrA.L COUIT PUILI C us A.dllintetutton Pro1r .. coorcUnatlon and en St reeta and duha1e lneerlna Tufftc re1ulaltOM Cenen t opeut tone and Mlnteunc e Budget (A.a Revhed) 138,9)4 5 ,347 ll, 7l0 11,5 50 I, 782 171 992 343 315 160,192 183,113 ll0,838 150,J)l 207,002 214,099 2 77 721 l,J2l ,JJ6 237 1 84S 68,20 1 229 ,722 I, l.5 8,89S JJ8,S24 ss,.ss, Actual txpendlture1 and &nc uabra neet 128,920 5 ,285 14,9 10 10,6 32 1,4 88 166,205 327 144 0 170 , I !6 183 .~H 1)7, 14) 13 9 ,045 202 ,OJJ 222,262 259 70 ] l1 l 1'1 25~ 221 , 18 71,796 l l S ,247 l ,OS9, 16 146 .~ S 'U t, 71 Senior autre1 ____ 4_:.afil.9 --~'~90 Tota l publi c , .. 1 )94 940 }. 249 9'it1 Ml TT DEVILOPM!NT Co de enfor c •aent 214,"77 Kou•l na a nd nde n l o ,..n t 101 ,410 Plannt n __ 1 ~~.i!!.6 To tal C0491.t n1ty da •Hlopaent __ 4'17U1 PAll<S ClttATl , ...... 9l'ii,3H htrutton __; coill To tal park.1 and ucreat ton I 'M 9) 1'01.l Ot:P AA T Pollo petrol Pollo a dah,latut l Co -..anttatl • 1Ml eh.ltu hM1tl .itoea Tuai ,.110 11•,art•nt Pl 0 ,., l rtn ... taletutton ,1n a..appn,H lCMI Hra rea Volw"te•n PravantlM 1'rahlt Total f ha 4 ,a rt .. nt LIi Alt tool ••P•114httr•a 1,4 ) I 11, Olll '· ll) 11,,111 -• ... , l I IL • Actu a l (Over) Under ~-- 10 ,014 62 (1 ,200) 918 294 -.h1!I _!l.t!!.~ (9 ,924) (6'.~t~\ 11,)lf, 4,969 (8,161) ~!.! _...!&!! 14 ()f,) (3,59 5) 14 ,47' 99, S (8,161) '1,8 • -1!...l~_I) _J~ QA.:. 4,U "· .. , (7, SI l,'11 lll,,u I (1,117, /) I • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS COHBlN INC BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 1981 WITH COMPARATIVE TOTALS FOR DECEMBER No. 22 No. 23 ASSETS Central cash and investment (deficiency) 10,258 $(10,054) Cash with paying agent Cash with Cou nty Treasurer 969 319 Current assessments receivable 20 ,684 3,931 Deferred asseesmenta receivable 82,739 19,655 Other receivables 2,564 Due from other governments Due f rom other funds Total assets 114,650 16 ,415 LlAB IL ITlES AND FUND BALANCE (DEFICIT) Accounts payable Mat u red bonds payable Matu red l ntereat coupons payable Deferred revenues 82,739 19,655 Bonds payable 120,000 Fund Balanc e (Deficit): Reserved for encumbrance• Reaerved for debt aervice (88,089) Unreserved ~) To tal Fund Balanc e (Deficit) (88,089) ~ 1ill...ill $16,41 5 -30- • • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO 31, 1980 PAV [NC D[STRICTS No. 26 No. 2~ No. 24 No. 25 North South l, 101 $ 10, I 17 6,924 $26 ,223 26,000 711 1,050 5,678 3,660 46,983 3,575 21,957 328,888 28 ,600 46,200 26,718 417,666 53,835 59,448 56,122 26,000 711 1 ,050 21,957 328,888 28 ,600 25,000 314 ,000 2 1,000 60,000 540 (20 ,2 39) (307,344) 2 1,000 (30,202) --1Q.lli (20,239) (307,344) _E.lli. (30 ,202) ll!.,.ill $4 17 ,666 $53 ,835 59 448 I • • • I - • • I I I I • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Sidewalk No. 27 E!!!!ill $17 ,352 408 4,287 839 12 .556 2,943 113,004 9,200 147 ,199 I 3 ,390 1l 3,004 9,200 140,000 (105 ,805) (105,805) ~ _hill $147 ,1 99 ~l_l~ Surplus or Deficiency $21,796 304 19,744 10,444 52 ,288 10,444 ~ ~ ~51 , 286 • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO neferred Dovntown Assess-Totals Oev elo pmen t ~ .!.ill. 1980 $178,150 $ 262 ,275 345,510 27,761 124 ,04 J 12, 39 5Q8 34,583 148,659 134,75h 311,246 372 926,105 60),005 2,564 7 .1; 1 523 ,979 46 ,200 132,700 372 1,425,960 1,347,76) 24,536 80,658 J 13 ,298 26,000 118,85h I, 761 4 I 781) 311,246 372 926,10 5 60) ,0 > 398,800 1,078,800 958,986 67,9)) 68,473 36 ,OU) (278,536) (809,215) (507 ,169) (210 ,603) 53 1 378 _ (471,162) (687,364) $523,979 illi SI 425 9h0 ~l ,347,lhJ ---- I • • -31- • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FUNDS COMBINING STATD!ENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE nil EIID!D DECEMBER 31, 1981 WITH COIIP AIIATIVE TOTALS FOil YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1980 PAVlNG DlSTRlCTS No. 26 No , 22 No. 23 No. 24 No. 25 North REVENUES Earnlngs on inveataenta 2 ,993 $ 435 5,747 $ 3,483 lntere1t on asseasaenta l0,879 3,5l 7 l, 747 24 ,494 Aa11esa11ent of property owner, 20,684 3,931 3,660 46,983 Contribution fro• City of Englewood Co ntribution1 fro• Dovntovn Development Hiacellaneoua 6 --11..I1Q. Total revenues 34,562 ~ ____Llg ~ __hill EXPENDITURES Con at rue t ion 9,125 Interest expenae 9,732 1,898 l ,575 19,526 7,308 County collection fu 392 77 67 831 Miacellaneoua 353 200 250 512 220 OTHER USES -TRANSFERS Total expendi turea and other uaea 10,477 _!.WQQ. --1...lli ~ 7 528 EXCESS {DEFICI! CY) OF ll!V!NUES OV!l EXP!NDITUllES AND OTHU USES 24,085 8,898 3,950 56,357 (4,045) RESERVE FOR ENCUIIJllAIIC!S -JANU.UY I 9,125 540 llt:S!RVE FOil ENCUMIIIANC!S -DECENIU 31 (540) llESEllVE FOIi D!IT SUVIC'I! -Dt:C u )I 8 ,089 20,239 307,344 {21,000) CUMULATIVE !FF!CT Of CIIANG! IN ACCOUNT! (l0),423) (2),5 ) {25,617) (375,871) {40,600) UNIIESElV!D fU IALAIIC!S {DEFICIT) -JANU.UY l a 751) _i..ru --1...!h 12 170 _&ill UNRESERvtD F D IALAIICES (DEFI CIT) -D au 31 L-<! ~) 1.___Q_ L___Q_ 1...!.Q...lli ---- I • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO No. 26 Sidewalk Surplus or Dovntown Deferred Tota le South .!!!!.:...11. Diatrlcta Oeficiencl Develoeae.nt Aaseaaae.nt ill.! 1980 $ 3,442 3,716 $ $ 4,661 $ 35,662 $ $ 60,139 $ 24 ,191 801 3,267 44,705 27 ,1 97 3,575 92,895 2,943 19,744 48,622 243,037 2 16,700 5,874 58,560 372 64,806 330,300 96,000 ___ 2 12,760 -1.Ll.ll _.LJill 102,485 -1..ill. --11...m. 142,844 _..fil 425,44 7 714,900 12,210 484,646 505 ,981 372 ,852 10,800 27,821 92 22,390 101,142 39,621 36 43 42 327 1,815 1,721 I 230 5,725 200 (17) 3,850 11,523 4,581 30,000 30,000 so,ooo [ ~ 45,799 ---.lli -MW!2 510 ,886 _.lli....ill 498,77 5 (4,049) 56,686 3,410 (2,636) (368,042) 372 (225,014) 216,125 l 11,509 14,833 36,007 9, 125 67, 9ll (68 ,473) ( ,007) 30,202 105,805 278,536 809,215 (32,175) (207,511) (12,143) ()0, 188) (372) (851,493) ~ 33,518 LLlli 74 .6(,8 142 606 m ,12§ .L..__Q_ 0 0 .LlL.lli .L..__Q_ $ 0 53 ,378 • I • • -)- • • ) - I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO proprietary funds combining and individual fund financial statements • I . . • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT ENTERPRlSE FllNDS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET DECEMBER 31, 1981 • • • WITH COMP ARATIVE TOTALS !'OR DECEMBER 31 , 1980 ASSETS C\mRENT ASSETS Central cash and inveataenta Cash designa t ed for future conatructton Cash vlth paylng agent Ac c ounts receivable Klacel laneous receivable• Due fro• other sovermaenta Due from Bi-City Joint Venture Inventortea of utertal and aupplie1 Total current aa1et1 OnlER ASSET S Advances to 'Bl-City Joint Venture Investment in Bi-City Joint Venture Advan c e.a t o r conatruction T'>tal other a11et1 RE ST RlCT!O ASSETS Central ca1h r e atri c ted for conatruc tion Central caah re1tricted for bond reeerve Central c aah reatricted for debt aervice To tal reatricted a1aet1 PROPERTY , PLAIIT, AND EQUIPMENT 01 a t r1but i on and co llec tion ayateu Treataen t pl a nt llav va t er and t re at e d w-ater eerv l c e faclll tlea RA v va ter -wa ter rtghte Land Other Con e tructton tn pro1re11 lee• acc...u lated deprec tat ton Total property, plant and equtpaent 1981 1 ,1 36,9 79 $1 ,322,023 376,235 2 1,600 188 66,384 8 7 ,995 12 ,625 18,642 6,91 2 50,988 115, 74 I 1,359,346 -~ ), 990,382 7,098 ,557 3,225 ,910 6 ,076,039 I, 194,43 865 ,699 2 ,792,776 25 ,24], 799 2 789 365 22 454 4 )4 20 ,000 11,5 39,755 11,55 9,755 9 16,185 916 ,185 2,042,347 2,651 ,583 56,000 53,684 1,975 ,802 6,779,416 497 269 282 147 $21 1 813,780 $19,615,053 -l - CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO Go lf Cour ae 4 1,036 41 ,036 368,596 368 ,596 40,000 6 995 46,995 4,141, )) I I , 287 129,96 4 ,4S5,585 2 ,500,038 376,235 21 ,788 154 ,379 12 ,625 25,554 50,988 I 15 141 J ,251 ,34 8 20 ,000 I 1,539 ,155 368 ,596 11 ,92 8 ,351 9 16 ,185 40,000 6 995 963 ,180 6,032,729 9,150,140 3,225,910 6,016 ,0]9 5 ,391,772 1,097,610 4 ,898,540 36,418,800 1980 To ta l 1,508,]61 I ,670,451 J , 985 I 79, 3 I I 23 ,437 I 1,563 62 1,737 97 061 4 ,115 ,906 20 ,000 10,918 ,490 10 1 938 ,490 5 ,8 ,644 4,273,3]9 2 ,784,724 ,016 ,039 5,2Jtl,07 I 668,6\5 9,090,716 33,918,208 J 851 9H 10 066 271 4 244 710 f45 120 ~ I • • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO 1981 LlilILlTl!S A.'ID FUND tgUITY Wa~ ~ Colf Coune Tota l Total CUIW!NT LlillLITIES Current ln1tallaent• of long-term debt 680 .000 s 165,000 15,000 860,000 tntereat payable I 74, JOO 84,848 17 ,23) 276 ,181 Matured intereat and bond• payable 21 ,600 188 21 ,788 Account1 payable 169,040 266 , 20) ],906 439,149 Dl1trt.ct fe.ea payable 53 ,6]] 5),6)3 Due t o 11-Clty Jotnt Venture Unearned di1po1a l aervlce re venue 551 ,684 55 I 684 Tot.al c urrent ltabllU:le1 I 1 044 1 740 1 ,121,556 36 139 2,202 ,4 35 LONG-TERM DEBT General obllgatlon refunding water bond,, including bond preaiUll of $83,867 7,)58,867 7,358 ,867 8,057,636 l.etundlng aewer 'Cevenue bond1 1 aerleo 1976 926,000 926,000 I ,02 ,000 Uae tax revenue bond1, aer1ea 1981 A and B I 1 685 1 000 450,000 2,135 ,000 l 7 ,358 ,867 2,611 ,000 450 ,000 10,419 ,867 9,083,636 FUND EQUITY R.eaerved for aewer r eve.nue bond1, aerlea 1976 83,000 L Contrlbutlona: Cont rl but 1001 -eatlaated acqulaltlon coata of prope:rty 1 plant , equlpaent 5 ,845 ,542 I ,809 ,583 7,655,125 JO, 707,285 Contrlbuttoa.1 -aeneral fund ],)89,353 3,389,353 federal Covernaent 63,231 918,2 75 940 ,445 I ,92 I ,95 I I, 921,919 State Covernaent 6 ,397 6,397 6,397 Federal and State Covernaenta -11 -C I tJ treataent plant 9 ,243,554 9,243,554 8 ,982,065 Syatea developaent feel 421 ,759 5 ,071,895 5,493,654 4 ,SOJ,856 Total con.trlbutlon1 6,330,532 17,049,704 4,)29, 79 27,710,034 26,121,H2 a.talned earnlna• (deficit) 9 ,079,641 p I 167,21)7) 7,912,434 7 ,44 2 ,766 To tal fund equity IS,410 1 171 15,882,497 4,129,798 15,622,468 JJ,647,288 $21, I 3 1 780 $19 ,615,053 $4,815,937 8,244,770 ~120 661, I • • -7- • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO E!ITERPRI SE l'UIIDS COHIIINlNG STATEHEIIT OF OPERATIONS AND CIIAIIGES IN lll!TAINED EARNINGS Y!AJ. l!llll!D D!C!IIIIRR ll, 1981 WITII COHPARATIVE TOTALS FOR YEAR !ND!O D!CEllll!R 31, 1980 IN OPERATING UV!!IIUES Water ••lea Dlapoaal eervlcea Connection fe.ea llaw water aalea Meaber1hip1 Green fees bntala Other Tot.al operating revenue.a OPERATING EXPENSES Source of aupply Povor and puapins Purlflcatloa Tranaalaaion and dlatrlbut ion Sanitary ayatea Ct ty' a ah.are of 11-Cl ty Jolnt Ventura ope rat ion utpenaea Cu1toeer accountina and collection A.dmtntatratlva and general Co11110dltie1 and contractual 1ervt c e1 Franchlae tax Other Doproclatlon, lncludtna ll-Clty Jolnt V•nturo daproclatlon in oever fund of $2S6, 97S and $2S2,441 1D 1981 and 1980 roopectholy Total operatlna expe.nae1 (LOSS) noK OP!RATI NS OTIIU IN (!IP&N Ada1ntatrat1•• f•• -11-CitJ' Jolnt Venture !arnln.11 on tnvettMnta lntere1t ts:pen•• Pa1tn1 •a•nt '• fee, (Lo11 ) o rollreMftt of fh.od H Htl rtltatloT\ of nd pr alua Caln n ••e r inve1t nt e&t han • Su aldy Ht1 cellan• u• nT IN (LO S) l!T41N .D !ARN!N CS (D flCIT) -J ARY l A.dd -l•••rv, for • wer refund lna \M>nd1, SorlH of 1,1, UTAIN D l AR l <; (0 FlClT) -D!C!KIU 31 • Water $2,)Jl, 120 7,456 320,781 479 2,661,836 179,352 365,847 290,952 240 ,126 95,298 153,034 69,291 6,900 294,916 1 ,695,718 96 , 118 168,603 (Sl2, 73 ) (2 ,61 6) (414) I , 76 6 76,421 ,40),220 9 019 41 -38- $ 1981 Sewer 2,118,930 77, l 15 4 ,400 2 ,200,445 69,124 1,829,936 217,340 184,254 6 ,56 7 ,75 1 5 ,412 lll, 1 0 (128, 45) C 07) Cl ,HJ) ( hO, 54) • Golf Courae. 21,594 165,045 38,430 ~ 2Jl 1 954 108,453 186,52 1 ....1.L.lli ...ill...ill. (82 , l) ( 17 ,97)) 100,.:.14 82, 61 1980 Total Total $2,333,120 $2,324,b 5 2 ,118,930 1,821 , 146 84,571 17,789 320,781 232 ,2 12 21 ,594 14,472 165,045 11 7 ,68 5 43,309 33,478 8,885 36,599 5 1 0 96,235 4 ,598,0 26 179,352 124 ,887 36 5 ,847 306,146 290,952 234 ,714 240,126 154 ,994 69,124 81,416 1,829,936 I, 760 ,169 312,638 312 ,497 445 ,741 442,979 186,521 133,7 77 112,861 12 , 37 j 14, 51 10, Bl 71 l 323 4,781,072 Jl5 , 16) 5,412 4 1,811 (h5 , 156) (1,121) ( j4) l • h l h, 68 7 .4.l,IM ~ I I I • • - • I I I I ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Wat er sale• Connectlon charges Rental• !arnlnga on lnveat•enta Rav vater 1ale1 Aaorthation of bond pcealua Kl ace 1 laneoua Source of aupply Power and l)\aplng Purt f le.at ton $2,333,120 7,456 4 79 168,603 320,781 18,769 38,719 $2,887 ,927 ~ 179,352 365,847 290 ,9 52 TranNlaalon and dhtrlbutlon 240,126 Adainlatratlve and general 327,575 Debt aervlc• )12, 7)8 qul1ltton1 of property, plant and equtpaent Depreci at lon 294 ,916 $2,211, ~ • • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO WAT!R UTILITY PUND STAT!HIINTS OP lEV!NU!S AND !XP!NDITUlES -BUDGET AND ACTUAL POl THE Y!.il !NDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 SYSTEM DEVELOP- MENT FEES $ 130,300 ENCUH- BRANCES CAPITAL 12/31/81 OUTLAY $ 29,371 1,269 61,915 710 55, l 15 115 ,257 $148 ,580 $315 ,257 -9- BUDGET ACTUAL AS REVISED $2,333 , !20 $2,296,000 137,756 30,000 479 3 ,500 168,603 75,000 320,781 240 ,000 18 ,769 38,719 25 ,000 p,018,227 $2 ,669,500 EXP!NDltURES DEPRECI- ATION ENCUH- AND DEBT BRANCES SERV lCE 12/31/80 ACTUAL $ (973) $ 207,750 365,847 (710) 291 ,511 719 )02, 760 (58,640) 269,645 666,066 l, 178,804 on ,9 10> 194,602 (294,916) lli.!.....!ll $(235,574 $2,810,919 ACTUAL OVER (UNDER) BUDGET $ 37,120 107,75 6 (3,021) 93,603 80,781 18,769 _J1,fil $348 I 727 BUDGET ACTUAL (AS OVER(UNDER) REVISED) BUDG ET 156,182 51,568 310,762 55 ,085 247 ,772 43,739 289,584 13, l 76 325,764 (56,119 I, 178,805 (1) 571, l 70 (376 ,568) $1,080,039 $(269, 120) I • • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO Dlspo1al se r vice s Conn~c t lon cha rgea Adat nlet rat lve fee -Bi-City Jo1 nt Venture Earnlng1 on investments Bond proceeds Hi acel laneoua I t-City treataent Sanlt ry eyeteaa Ad•t nlltretlve and gene ral Oebt I rv t ce A.c:qut1lt ton o f property , plant and equlpaent D pr c h,tlon • SEWER UTlL lTY FUND STAT!:MENTS OF REVENUl!S AND EXPENDITURES -BUDGE T ANO ACTUAL 1'0R TIIE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 ~ $2,1 18,930 77 , I 15 85 ,412 3 13 ,208 13 573 $2,608 ,238 EXPENSES ENCUl1- ANO BRANCES SYSTEM DEVELOP- MENT FEES $ 859,498 $859,498 CAPITAL TRANSFER .!lL1ill.! OUTLAY $1 ,829 ,9 36 69,124 473,520 817 I ZS,445 703,242 1,759,027 _li6.....2~ $2 ,89 7 ,991 $704 ,059 ]"1 , 759 ,027 -40- REVENUE!._ BOND BUDGET PROCEEDS ACTUAL !AS REVlS lO) $2 ,118,930 $2 ,438,000 936,613 1 ,032,000 85,41 2 85,000 313 ,208 94,080 I , 750,000 I, 750,000 1,600,000 13 573 36,640 $1 ,750 ,000 $5 ,217 ,736 $5 ,285,720 ---- EXPENDITURES DEPRECl- ATI ON ENCUl1 -BUDGET ANO DEBT BRANCES (AS ~ 12/31/80 ACnJAL REV I SEO) $ $1,829,916 $1, 47,6)7 69, 124 81 ,H8 (1 ,009) 47),)28 559 , 5 9 )1,950 160, )95 160, )9'> (2,959) ~966) 2,459,310 2 ,93.,605 $()65 ,016) $0 ,968) $4 ,992 ,093 ss , 58'>,7•;1 ACTUAi OV ER (l'~UER) BUDGET $(319,070) (95,387) 412 219,128 15 0,000 _ill,_Qll) $ (67,984) ---- ACTU AL OVER(UNDER) BUDGET (17,701 J ( 1. ,41 4) (86,261) (4n,295J $(59),671 J ---- I • • In - • I ... ... I M mberships Green Fees Golf Cart Rental Concesa1ona Op ratln Subsidy Miscellan ous Bond Proc eds P reonal S rvic • Coaaodlti••, Contractual S rvic • C pita! Outlay !nt r et D rr , iatl n • • • • MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE F1JND STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES -BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 Revenues S 21,594 165,045 38,430 8 ,885 100,434 $334,388 Expenses $10 ,453 ,521 17,973 21,441 $334, )88 Encuai- brancee 12/31/ I $ 5,287 $5 1 2A7 REVENUES Bond Proceeds 465,000 $465,000 Actual Revenues And Other Fi - nanctng Sources S 21,594 165,045 38,430 8 ,885 100,434 465,000 $799 ,388 EXPENDITURES O«preci-Encum- Capital tion & hr ncu Outlay Debt Service 12/31/80 $ $ (2 ,275) 18,519 (17,973) ill.,ill) $18,519 S.ill..,iU $(2,275) • Budget (As Revised) s 13,800 201,450 35,000 10,000 38,000 630 $298,880 Actual $108,453 189,533 18,51 $316,505 Actual Over(Under) Bud et s 7,794 (36,405) 3,430 (1,115) 62,434 (630) 465,000 $500,508 Bud et (As Rev1 $116 ,070 l!I t, 7 )~ 18,700 1.lli,,.l!/..,;. ---- $(7,617) 7 ,798 (181) $ 0 )> z z C )> r Q ~ -< ~ i r m ~ 8 0 (") ~ 0 ~ • - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO ENTERPRISE FUNDS COMBINING S'rATEMENT OF CHANGES IN flNANClAL POSlTlON YEA!\ ENDED DECEMBER Jl, 1981 WITH COMPARATIVE TOTALS FOR 1980 _____ __§!!._U_RCES OF WORKlNG CAPITA L Net incoae (lot s) lte11s not requlrlng wo rking c apita l: De pree lat l o n Gain o n sale of equlpae nt Aband onment o f ut l llty plant Working c apltal pro vided by o pe r at lone Proceed a fro• eale of bonda Proc e e d 1 fro• d1lpo1t t lon o f flxed aaae ta Contribut ions Contrlbutlo n fro• Fe dera l Government De e re ae ln r e stri c ted caah Contrlbutlon fro e Fede ral and Stat, Cove rneent a -Bt -Clty Jolnt Venture Syate• deve lopment feea Total aourc e.1 of working capital USES Of WQIU(lNG CAPlTAL Ad van ce• fo r cona t ru ct lon Add1tl o na c o p l ant and e qut p•e n t 1le ductt ona tn l o ng-t e ra deb t tnveatee n t l n Bl -Cit y Joint Ve nture tnc re a ae ln r:eat r l c ted c aah To ta l uee1 of working c apita l I NC REAS . (DECllE ASE) l N RKlN G CAPl TAL WOUlNG CAPlTAL (DEFl ClT) JAN UARY l W UlNG PlTAL (D!FlCl T) -DECE HHR Jl l ll CllE ASE (DECREAS!.) __ l N WOllKlN G CA P lTAL REP RES ENTE D BY lncrca ee (decrea1e) in c urrent a11e t 1 Cull llacatvable1 Ou frl• other a vernaen t 1 Duo troa otll•r fund, ond ll-Clty Jot nt Ventura tttrlal nd •~pply tnventorle1 locr•••• (deer •••) ln curr~nt llabtltt l ea Current ln1ta l 184!nt1 of lon -ter• d lnt_.r••t payable • Ai:t,Hntl payable Dlotr l « f H povobl• Oepnolr Du• t ,., other fun.de an 11-Ctty Jol t V nlute U 1 •rl\•d t poaal er-..lC't re" n11 • I) IN Ii.UN~ ITA~ Water S 676,4 2 1 29 4 ,916 4 34 971 ,77 1 130, JOO 1,102,011 )15 ,258 698,769 -r;or;;:ofi 88 , 0,. 226 562 1.~ (6),02~) (8,820) 11,46. )0,000 2 , 8) ( 1 1,825) -42- 198[ Sewer Colf Courie S (289, 75)) S 396 ,966 2 1,1,4 1 107 ,21) 21 ,44 1 I , 750 ,000 465 ,000 )37, 193 )2 261,48 9 859 ,498 2,9 78 ,2 32 8 21 ,634 I , 759,020 165 ,000 e1s,2~,o 916 .185 J, 718 ,451 (740,219) _(ll_(l~) S (9&0, 763) 168 ,59& 4 12, 1 16 15 ,000 (19 ,073) 23 970 $ 4,897 (232,61)) IO,H99 (26,924) 2,521 (S70 , 749) 8 U·i'~9 ) -10 1 1\H 10 ,000 62,701 n ,0 I 10,,]'; • J\, 00 11,11\ ( I) )86 ,66 8 II J ,J2J __ _l!]i 1,100 ,425 2,215 ,000 lJ7, 193 32 261 ,489 989 , 798 4 90) 9 37 368 ,5% 2 ,486 ,400 8 78 ,769 8 78,240 961.180 '>7~ IR'> 1~80 To ta I 56 I. ;51 6 l8, ,st t ln) 4 Hh 1,206,458 I, J00,000 49 19 l ,202 1,286 2 ,S4J ,28'.o 4 ,990 ,981 /b9, )lll I b, J. -5-q46 fl?' (671,248) (qq ,hS ) ~ 12'!_,h]h S (641 1 260) ~9K (2" , 71 ) () >, 741,) 11 ,991 11\,0()fl Ml ,01~ 1. \'J 10,09K (1/,h, 172) 7d , b7 ( '·~, k7 I I • • - - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPO RT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLO RADO INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS COKIIINlNG BALANCE SKEET D!C!IIIER 31, 1981 WlTR COMPilATlVE TOTALS FOR DECEMBER )1, 1980 1981 Central Servi-Self ASSET S ~ Center tneurance CUIUl£N T AS S!TS Ce ntral c aah and inveataenta $)1,222 $ 665 ,8e) $904,2 12 Caeh on hand 25 Po 1tage eeter depo1lt 5 46 Prepaid 1.naurance 6 ,4)) Mia cellaneoua receivable• lnventorlea of aaterlal and auppllea 20 ,009 19 7 ,970 Total current a,aeta ...ll...ill. 86),8 78 910 ,645 PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Buildln& 6 )),672 Offi c e furniture and fixture• 1,911 6,514 Aut o eotlve l ,8 SJ,062 Ka chtne a and equlpaent 5),62 ) 89.1 77 5S.SJ4 2 ,S8 2 ,42S L••• accumu l ated de prec 1atlon _ll..ill. 1,412 ,6 53 To ta l plant and e qulpae nt 33 , )8 2 1,169,772 .ill..ill. $2 ,03)1 6SO $910 ,64 5 -44- • 1980 Tota l To t al $1 ,60 1,)17 $1,16),167 25 25 S46 S ,6) I 6 ,4 3) 6 ,4)1 4 ,794 2 17 9 79 173 1)1 1 ,826 ,300 1, JSJ , 181 6 )3 ,672 6)),672 8,42S 7 ,699 l ,8SJ ,06 2 1,8 17 ,846 142 ,800 125 ,260 2,637 ,959 2 ,58 4 ,477 11 4J4 ,80S 1 ,253 ,90 1 1 ,20 3,1 54 I ))0 S76 $),0~9 ,4S4 ~I t I • • • • ,. • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD .COLORADO 1981 Central Servl-Self-1980 LIABILITIES AND FUND EQUITY Service• Center tneurance Total Total CURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts payable $ 4,071 42 ,8 51 $ 6 ,9 77 53 ,899 $ 24 ,405 !.1tiuted dental and basic aedic al clai1H payable 194,434 194 434 ~-.lQ§_ Total c urrent liabilities ~ 42 ,851 20 1,411 24 8,333 210 ,61 1 PUND EQUITY: Reaervea : Police profeaa tona l liability 275 ,000 275 ,000 275 ,000 Stop loaa 252 ,793 252,793 245 ,375 Total reserves 527 ,793 527 I 793 520 ,)75 Contrlbutiona l Water Utility fund 100,924 100,924 100,924 Sewer Utility Fund 52,000 52,000 52,000 City of 1!:nglewood ...ll,._ill_ 1,147 ,264 1, 160 ,6 22 1,060,621 Total Co ntributi ons ...ll,._ill_ 1,300,188 1,313,546 1,213,545 Retained earnlnga 67 ,730 690 ,611 ...!J!.l..lli. 939,78 2 719,266 [ .ill....ill. p ,033 ,650 $910 ,645 p ,029 ,454 $2 ,683,757 I • • -45- • • - • • • • • ANNUA L FINANCIAL REPOR T CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD . CO LORADO INTERNAL S!RVIC! FUNDS COMB I NING STAT!Ml!IIT or OP!liTIOIIS .um CIIANGES IN llETAIN!D EARNINGS Y!.il !ND!D D!C!IGl!I. 31, 1981 WITH COIIPARATIV! TOTALS FOR Y!il !ND!D D!C!Kll!R 31, 1980 Central 1981 Servi-Self OPERATING REV!IIUE ~ ~ In•urance 11 lling• to departaenta $138,136 $1,052,119 Medicare 3,704 lneurance blllinga laaic aedical 487,199 Dental 99,006 Life 36,841 Lona-teno dloabll1ty ~ Total operattng revenue 138,136 1,052 ,119 653,5 76 OP!IATING EXP!NS!S Coat ot uterial uaed 57 ,592 402 ,4 34 Per1onal and adalnlatrative aervlcea 20,061 186,96 7 16 ,998 Co•oditiee and contractual aarvicaa 46,456 117,310 Inauranca espea.aa1 laoic Mdical 525 ,386 llajor Mdlcal 15 ,850 Dental 108,039 Life 39,58 5 Loaa-teno dhablllty 28,77 8 Mi1cellan.eou1 3 ,213 Depreclatlon -1..lli 243 ,779 Total o peratlna expen1e1 ....ill...ill 9 50 ,4 90 737 ,80 IN (LOSS ) FROM OP!IATlOIIS 8,664 101,629 (84,273) 0 111!:l INCOlllt (lXPHH) l.arntna• on lnftataeeta 2 ,789 55,098 109 ,216 C.1n (looa ) o n oale af equlpaent (184) 7,3 17 tUac e l laneoua tnco• 300 NET INCONB -1.L.lli. 16 4 ,344 ~ UTAilfl!D !ilNINGS -J ANUAI.Y 1 ~ 526 ,267 156 ,498 U.TAtN!D tillllNGS -D!C!IGl!ll 31 l..ll.11Q $ 6 0 ,611 filWil -4 - • 1980 Total Tota l $1,190,255 S 1,039 ,208 3,704 3,466 48 7 ,19 9 463 ,540 99,006 95,869 36,841 33 ,355 26,826 23,337 1,843 ,831 1,658 ,775 460 ,026 438,540 224,026 159,359 16 3 ,766 164 ,115 525,386 381 ,711 15,850 5,194 108 ,039 79 ,003 39 ,585 33 ,355 28 ,778 19 ,767 3 ,213 16,966 24 9,142 252,601 1,817,811 1,550 ,611 26,020 108,164 167 ,1 03 120,757 7,133 7, 31) 300 36 200 ,356 236,270 739,226 502,956 939 ,782 7)9,226 I • • - I I I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS COMBINING STATEKENT OF CHANCES IN FINANCIAL POSITION YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 WITH COMPARATIVE TOTALS FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1980 SOU RCES or WORKING CAPITAL Net incoae lte .. not requiring (provldlng) working capital Depree lat ton (Lo11) on sale of equlpae.nt Working capital provided by operatlona Proceed• froa diapo1ltlon of fixed aaaet1 Capital contrlbutt!d fro• other funds Increase ln reserves Total 1ource1 of working capital USES OF WORKING CAPITAL Equipment acquired froa other tun.di Addltlon1 to plant and equipaent Total u1ea of working cap ital INCREASE (D!CREAS!) IN RKlNC PITAL WORK ING CAPITAL -JANUARY l WOO.ING CAPitAL -D C!'111El ll INCREASE (DECREASE) 1 IUtING CAPITAL l!PUS!NTED IY Inc rease (decre.a1e) tn curr•nt. i&llet1 Cuh le ce lvable a Inventor lee Oepo1lt1 Central ~ $1 I, 269 s. 363 __ _lli 16,816 4, 79S 21,611 32 872 -11..lli (I I, bl) 58 967 $47 ,706 $(S ,637) 2, )JS Prepaid tnaurance ..Q.Q!!i) (6, lHI) current ltablllt le1 Iner•••• (de e r••••) ln Ac cr,unt1 payable !1 t1uted d nt•l and cl ala payable bulr Mdlcal ! (DC A ) IM 2, 14 :!, 74 Sil!...ill.) -47- 1981 Servl- Center $164 ,344 243 ,780 --17...l!l) 400,807 9,090 100,000 S09 ,897 414 ,297 406 730 582 1,027 $399, l06 (4 ,794) 42, S 13 436,925 22,628 • Self- ln1urance S 24 ,943 24,943 .........2...il _ll_.1i! 32 , 3 I S 44,S81 Total 200 ,5S6 249 ,1 43 p,133) 442 , S66 I 3,88S 100 ,000 7 4 18 S63 ,869 128 ,472 12 , 472 4)5, 397 1980 Total 236 ,270 2S2 ,60 ! (7 313) 481 ,S58 40 ,236 91 ,268 -~ 664 ,S68 91,268 274 ,203 J6S ,4 71 299,097 _l~ 841,474 $1,571 ,968 $1 ,142,57 1 S 438 ,150 (4,794) 44,84ft l .... 4 J27 ,192 (7,866) 6 ,0l6 (J, 141) l 500) 320,711 , 10,6 01 I • • A I • CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO - 1, • • • - l • • • ••• ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT ~ CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO ,, account group schedules and compliance report on single audit • I . . -• • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLO RADO GENERAL FlXJ!:D ASSET CROUP OF ACCOUNTS STAT EMENT OF CHANGES IN GENERAL FIXED ASSETS BY FUND AND FUNCTION YEAll END!O O!CEHBEll 31, 1981 General lletireaents Fixed A1sets and Januarr l, 1981 Addltlono Salee GENERAL FIXED ASSETS Land $ 2,762 ,646 753,144 $ Bulldlnga 4,324,168 8,081 l11prove11enta othe r than buildings 275,699 19,851 Equipment 2 ,799,340 425,171 il...1.!Q) Total Ge neral Fixed A.s1 et1 ~I0 , 161,853 ~1 ,206,247 $il...1!Q) SOURCE OF INVESTMENT IN GPJIERAL FIXED ASSETS Public laproveaent Fund 6,123,098 389,406 Genera 1 Fund 4,026 ,650 417,557 (7,510) Water fund 8,185 ServiCenter Fund 3,920 Spec ial A.1a eaaaent 399 ,284 Total 11 0,161,853 11 ,206 ,247 $(7 ,5 10) FUNCTION -General Fund Legtalative and counael 10,390 28 3 Cl ty llanager 7,729 118 (650) City Att o rney 16,379 1,015 Employee re latt.001 6,534 139 Treaaury and record 18,642 739 Purchaalng 22,072 490 Munic tpa l Cou rt 28 ,6 27 19 5 Account lng 4,208 652 Data proce11 tn1 82,489 273 ,754 I.avenue dl'llalon 14,907 568 (3 ,586 ) Public work.a adalnlatratl on 3,381 124 !n1lneerln1 JJ,813 (950) Street, 46 ,828 5 ,066 (2,000 ) Traffi c 566 ,023 19,229 Fire 1,292,177 21,451 Pol l ee 63,480 5,266 Parke 2,118 ,950 23 ,070 (199) Senior retreat l on center 878, )80 13,042 Hou, t na and redevelopaent 1,273 Code enfo rceaent ll,685 995 Plannln& 9,253 ( 12S) Co-.inlcatlon1 )95,474 16,82) Ce.nera l aovernaent 2,443,227 761,225 lut Jdtna aalntenanc, a. 744 ),500 Library 975 I 8 58 , 50) Tote! fl0, 161,85) 11,206,247 $(7,510) ~o• an 111 Accountant•,~ -50- • • Trans fe r, Gene ral and Other Fixed Asset, AdJuat .. nt a Deceaber 31. 1 981 3,515,790 4 ,332 ,249 295 ,550 .ill .... !.!~) 3,206,8 8l $ .lli!,__!_!1) ~11,350 ,471 6 ,512,504 (I0, 119) 4 ,426,578 8,185 3,920 399 ,284 $( I0, 119) ~11 ,350,471 $ 10,673 7,197 17 ,394 6 ,673 19,38 1 22,562 28,822 4,860 356,243 11 ,889 3,505 32,863 49,894 585 ,252 514,8)5 1,828,463 968,746 2,34 1,82 1 (I0, 119) 881,303 I, 273 14,680 9,128 412,297 (514,8H) 2,68 ,617 12,244 I Ol) 691 $(10,119) II no f11 ----- I • • - I r I L • I '-JI • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO COMBIN ED SCH EDULE or CENT RAL CASH AND INVESTMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1981 ~CRl PTlON SAV lNCS ACCOU NT lntereat Rate (%) Fir!lt Natlonal Bank of Englewood S.25 CERTLY!CAT ES OP DEPOSIT Centennl al St ate Bank Columbia S.t v lnss and Loan Ftrst lnter 1it tat e Bank o f Engle..,o od Commun{ ty Sank and Trust First Nati ona l Bank of Englewood Majesti c Savtnga and Loan Republl c Natlonal Bank We a tern Fe dera 1 Savi ngs a nd Loan Total certtficate1 of depos it GOVERNM ENTAL SECURITIES Fe deral Fa rm Cr e,Jlt Bank Feder a 1 Hoae Loan Bank Federal La nd Bank Federal Natio nal Kortg11ge Aa1octat 1on Ea.p o rt -l•port Sank Small Bua lneaa e:;: Adalnl 1t r tlon R~p ur cha1e Agree•nt 1 U. S. Treaau r y Bond CORPClaAT! S!CUIITI ES laltlaoro , Ohio Equipment Trull Che1apl! kt: and Ohlo Equ(plll(>nl lr,, .. t '1t a1ourt Pa t l e- Southern Pact fl c F.qutpeent South~rn Ra 11 t.qu t pa nt Truer St. l..ou1t S011 thwe1te1 ,, !qll i p1unt Tru1l U,,1011 P.a t f l e Tot rp ..-a, " Ul f ti TOTAi, - ADO HI, 1£ /'AID t r 12 .75-15.75 16 . 75 15.4-15. 5 12 .5 12.0-17.0 17. 27 1 12.0-15. 75 1.15 8.9-11.6 9 .05-13. 35 7. 3 6.75-9 .5 5.10 J. 175 11.0-16 .S 8 .625 8. S 11.n 7. 75 8. 25 7, s-~-n I. 5 "· -11.r -51- Maturity ~ 1/20/82 lO 4/30/82 4/23/82 12 /30/81 t o 4/19/82 1/29/82 1/15/82 to 3/29/82 1/16/82 2/19/82 t o 10/1,/82 7/7/83 1/20/82 t o I /23/84 3/25/82 t o 2/27 /84 10 /20/82 9/ 10 /82 to J/12/84 2/201 82 10/1/83 Ope n 11/ I '\/9) l/ l /84 I/ I /Bl 10/15 /Hl 2/ 1/84 bl 1/8} tu 10/ 1/84 5'15/8~ l/1/8l to 9/1/8~ • Par Value ~~ ~~ L.!'!.-h'!~ s 300 ,000 300 ,000 100,000 100 ,000 525,000 525 ,000 100 ,000 100 ,000 3 ,075,000 3 ,075 ,000 100,000 100 ,000 850 ,000 850,000 100,000 100 000 _ll , 150 1 000 ~5 , 150,000 500 ,000 500,000 950,000 94 7 ,625 35,000 32 ,200 650 ,000 618,250 60,000 55,200 100,000 90,000 2 ,046 ,403 2 ,046,403 100 ,000 _fil,]1J. i.",541,40 3 $4 ,48 ),05) 100 ,000 85,411 100 ,000 101 ,6}9 45,000 37 ,706 200 ,000 174,006 J9:l ,000 l6 J ,6 J7 ion, oo 188 , 319 61 llt10 __ s 9 .. ~1 !.! suo 225 Sl1,27S,717 I ,S ( 5, 5-ll un.11 l I 116,411) (I , 2 , 2ft }) __Q~,!.11) $8, 7~2 ,444 Kar ket Valu~ 11..:? ;i9 30\J ,OU l 100 ,oon 52,,:><,o 100 ,00il 3 ,075 ,0<JO 100 ,000 850 ,00~ 100 ,000 .ll.,_150 000 475 ,000 920 ,8 ~ JJ ,38 1 602 ,657 58 ,200 89 ,250 2 ,046 ,403 138 1 6 2b ~4,.E 87, \00 100 ,000 40 ,275 177 , 7\0 J s.no 191, SOI) )',f ,oo. SI s. ,11.:! 11,_ill, I • • - • Grant Title Department of Housing and Urban Dev<?lopment: Section 8 Elliating Co-,nity Developaent Block Crant1 Public Houaing I u, Section 8 ev Con•truction "' I !.nvt ronaenta l Protect ion A•enc y Federal Revenue SharinA o•rt•nt of Interior: Land and Water Con1ervat too FV1td Adalnlltered: It• r l.edevelopaent Phaae 11 ndtcap d Play Apparatue (l) l•pr•••nt• r•nt•l auba ldy. Grant Number C099-E048-00I, 002, 003, 004, 005 and 006 1-79 -DS-08 -0002 !-81 -DS-08 -0008 C0-48-02 C0-48-03 C099-0002-00 I C080-329-01-0 06-200-300-J oa-ooaso 0 -oo S 0 0083S • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD SCHEDULE OF GRANT ACTIVITY YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 Federal Share Of Total Grant 363,845 227,000 390,000 4,925,162 553,645 Konthly Calcu- lation 13,302,450 Quarterly ca1- c vlatton 9 , I 260,6SO 12,000 Gran ta Receivable (Payable) I/ 1/81 (9,470) 5,064 S19,J81 153,681 94,130 83,650 12 ,000 Gr ants tamed .!!!....!2.!!.. $313 ,122 281,157 531,279 606,361 I 4,29 (2) l•c•u•• of th nature of th••• aranla. c ueulatl•• •xpendlturee •r• not Mantnaful. • • Grant Revenues ~ $334 ,171 281 ,157 749 ,223 614,726 0 Grants Re ceivable (Payable) .!.ill.!.m.. $(30,529) 20,919 301,437 14S, 316 94, I 30 217 ,94 12 ,000 Grant To tal Grant Expenditures Expenditures For 1981 To Date $302,013 (2) 16,662 3,002 (1) (2) 531,279 $12,893,320 10,048 (2) 4,130 114 ,296 217 ,946 12,000 }> z z C }> r ,, z ~ () 'f. :D m ~ :D ~ () =l -< ~ m ~ r;; § 0 8 ,... 0 :D > 8 • • l I I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPOR T CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO I Fl LEHMAN, BUTTERWICK • __ ,..._.__. & COMPANY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of En 6 lewood, Colorado We have examined the com bined financial statements of the City of Englewood, Colorado as of and for the year ended Decem b e r 31, 1981, and have issued our r -,port thereon dated March 26, 1982, which is qualified regarding the con- sistency of accounting for special assessment fund revenues. Dur examina- tion was made in accordance with 6 en-,rally accepted auditin.; standards; the provisions of "Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Pro6 rams, Activities and Functions ," prowul6 ated by the Comptroller General, whi ch p-,rtain tu financial nd compliance audits; the Office of ,".la nai;ement aud Bud 6 et' s "llajor Complianc-, Features of Programs Administered by State and Local Govcrnment " { the approved compliauce supplement); and, except as described iu the follo wi ng para,.raphs, provisions of Off ice of :1anagement aud Bud,.et {0MB) Circular A-102, "Unifono Administrative Requirements for Grants-In-Aid to State and Local Governments," Attachment P, ·Audit Requirements", and the Guidelines for Financial and Compliance Audits of Pede rally Assistt!d Pru6 ram {Guidelines); and , accordin6 ly , included such tests of th accountin1, records and such other auditing procedures s w considered neces sa ry in the circumstances . The r<?portins obj tiv s for co,opliance audits contained in the Guid lines sug,.est an examination of all transactions for compliance purpos es , s opposed to the 1 tive te tin& r quired by Attachment P; thert!for , w have followed th rnporting objectives of Attachment P. In addition, th Guidelines do not provide sufficient 0 uidance for determining the repr ent- ative ,1uruber of c har6 es to be examined and per[ormini; the procedures to scertain compliance. AccorJln6 ly, we utili~ed other materials a suppl - m nts in thos re AtteJ.ch,nent P r 4uir II that th Xlllllination lnclud d termination of wheth r th rd ral llnanci l r ports {including financi l status report , cash repo rt nd cl 1.'11 for d11 nc s and reimburs ments) prepared by the City of Ln11le wood, Color do con t iu ccur te and reli bl fin nclal dat • have be n in or11 d th t OHB interprets th phr s "accurat nd r li bl fin ncial d t " to n that th Fed r 1 fin nci l nt th underlying fln n i l d ta of the r nts within limits "nable and pr ctlc bl circumst nc s • _UtT • 1111 ....... ,,. llOJI 11l 1' -53- • ) I • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT The Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Englewood, Colorado Page Two • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO In our opinion, except for the matters that might have come to our attention had our examination encompassed the provisions of the Guidelines referred to in the second preceding paragraph, for the tested operations and records, the City of Englewood, Colorado complied with the material terms and condi- tions of its Federal grants, contracts and agreements, and the tested Feder- al financial reports present the underlying financial data of the grants within the limits described in the preceding paragraph. Further, based upon our examination and the procedures referred to above and except for the mat- ters that might have come to our attention had our examination encompassed the provisions of the Guidelines referred to in the second preceding para- graph, nothing came to our attention to indicate that the City of En g lewood, Colorado had not complied with the compliance matters referred to above, and the Federal financial-reports do not present the underlying financial data of the grants within the limits described in the preceding paragraph. This report is intended solely for the use of the City of Englewood, Colorado and the cognizant audit agency and should not be used for any other purpose. r 1 ~ A.~~// (n,P.(!. t LEttMAN, 8UTTERWICK & COMPANY, p.c. March 26 , 1982 -54- • I • • - l L l • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO statistical section • I . . ., .. 1140 '"' ,,ao ''" ''" 111• 1 110 .. ,,. ,,oo ... • '° ... • IO . ,. • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO TABUI l G!ll!IAL GOVE&Jal!IITAL llPDIDITIJUS IT fllllCTIOII I.UT TIN FISCAL fl.AU ConMr••tlon Debt(!) Pl•cal Ceoeral Public Public Culture , of Natural !!!!: Covernaent !lefety ~ lecreatlon ~ ~ "i•c• l laneo1.1a Tota l 1972 787,106 $1,620,894 $ 654,834 639,624 3,457 58,720 2 ,000 $3,766,635 1973 915,807 2,077,046 1,409,745 751,096 18,181 58,720 26,819 5,257 ,4 74 1974 1,101,931 2,431,187 1,120,259 1,509,513 20,412 SIi, 720 25,971 6,267,993 1975 1,172,913 2,992,087 1,141,5?1 1,120,427 24,074 58,720 6,509,742 1976 1,181,915 3,251,570 1,437,435 1,263,810 36,086 58,720 7,235,536 1977 1,362,204 3,748,746 1,651,020 l, 940,415 59,280 SIi, 720 8,820,385 1978 1,591,196 4,202,562 1, '67,407 1,825,616 79,312 SIi, 720 9,724,813 1979 1,801,881 4,757,373 2,456,998 1,189,778 78,704 58,720 11,043 ,454 1980 1,936,632 4, '93,093 2,391,568 2,006,120 93,127 58 ,720 11,479,260 1981 2,20,957 5 ,434,715 2 ,71),442 2,196,547 113,584 58,720 12,762,965 (l)Paya for debt Hrvlce oa aorta•&• tnatall•nt note oa Cit y 11,ill property 1thJ ch WH •••uaed upon purchaae of City lla ll, Indicator # 1 REVENUES PER CAPITA CPI WARNING TRE : Oecreufng net operating revenues per c1pft1 (constlnt dolhrs) , ... ---- Indicator #2 SALES TAX ELASTIC REVENUES WARNING TREND : Deer ufng 1010unt of elutic operotfng renn"*s u • percentlge of net operotfng revenues lt'U ltU 11'14 ttl6 ltll ltH 1tll Jilt itlO •Ill ,,u ,,u ,,.,. ,,.,. . • .,. ,,,, .• ,. ,,,, It • I • • 1111 ·I - I I I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO TABLE 2 GENERAL Allll SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS -I.EVENUES BY SOURCE LAST TEN f1SCAL YP..ARS Licenses Fieca l and ~ T_.!!!! ~ 1912 3,466,080 102,322 1973 3,474,069 \ll,449 1974 4,236,159 109,))2 l 975 4,716,120 ll2,264 1976 5 ,442,22) l)), 955 1977 7,)55,885 157 ,95) 1978 8,207,856 176,402 1979 8,74),248 168,182 1980 9,575,183 195,112 1981 11,164,532 )45,815 Indicator #3 ONE TIME REVENUES ARNING TRE ND: tncr 1s1ng u~e of one- t i o pera t 1 l'lg r~venue<. 1s • perce"U9 of net OPt!rl t1 nq reven,1es Inter-Chargu governaental for -~~ 380,913 985,829 967,113 l, 189,766 1,069,618 l, 150,465 1,227,501 l, 089, )56 l, 182,667 1,041,934 168, 24 l 178,891 288 ,589 )49, 859 )91,676 ~20, 24 9 55), 665 579,488 657,084 786,100 ••10 000 ••00 000 ,.uoooo ·--I IH,000 1 100.000 1,to,000 ,,00.000 Flnea and Hisr:e l laneoua ~ Revenue ~ 79,181 H,847 79,768 164,274 81,602 290,838 99,129 144,765 95,966 ))) , 6ll 125,016 1)), 16) 80,000 162,290 ))5, 276 179,845 )18, 19) )00, 5)6 327,452 315, )65 522,005 Indicator #4 PROPERTY TAX REVENUES CPI ••M!!l.!!J!dfil NO: Oec11n10g or negative growt h in property ta x revenues (constant doll a rs l ~ 4,250,5ij4 4,994,280 5,973,633 6,611,90) 7,467,0 49 9,44 2,731 10,66),090 11,078,)12 12,238,0)4 14,175 ,751 ,,n 11rl 1ll'4 II U ltl• lllf 1t?I tlll 1110 1111 ltU 117 111 4 ltl~ lll l tl f? I ll ltl l 1110 1111 -57- • I • • - • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT TABLE J TAX UV!ll\J!:S BY SOURCE LAST T!II Fl SCAL YE.U.S Prol?!rtl Taua !!.!!.. ~ ~ 1972 $3,616,8)6 296,291 197) J,6)6,222 J20,82J 1974 4,413,)51 349,757 1975 4, 71), 556 651,414 1976 5,439,894 772,0ll 1 977 7,)44,846 8)6, 77) 1978 8,207,856 871,883 1979 9,JJl,521 769,521 1980 10,241,248 794,641 1981 11 ,874,326 819,492 Indicator +5 UNCOLLECTED PROPERT Y T AXES WARNING TREND : Inc,..oslng •110unt of unco 11 ec ted property tu,es 1s I perctnllge of net property tu levles Speci fic Owueuhlp 21,714 2J,007 27,613 46,136 50,078 61,711 84,278 79,848 79,310 73,925 111 t:::::..,.. ____ -1_:::::::;::::==1:::-.... -::::;;:::::ao...,-... Utility Taua 290,592 )06, 981 J34,489 371,164 475,675 515,542 541,693 627,148 788,651 819,013 , ... '" ... .... ... .... ... - .... - • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO Sa lea Tau, lleta!l • Uoe £!.I.•.!.!!!.! $2,909,))4 108,905 2,760,576 224,835 3,231,655 469,837 3,171,998 472,844 l,672,216 469,914 .5,440,932 489,888 6,184,250 525,752 7,330,938 524,066 8,0JJ,OH 545,593 9,600 ,177 561,719 Indicator +6 USER CH ARGE COVER AGE WARN ING TREND : Oecre1s1ng revtnues frOM user charges 1s a percentage of tota 1 expenditures for providing rehted services ltll ttl.J ttl4 !Ill 111'1 1111 tlll tilt 111 0 1111 ti lt IIU 111'4 1116 1111 ltll 1111 1111 1110 11 11 -58- • • I • • n - [ r r L • L l • I '-' • • • • ANNUAL F INAN CI AL REPOR T CITY OF ENGLEWO OD .COLORADO .... .... ,o .. ... ... Levy Year l97L 1972 1973 1974 19H 1976 l977 1978 1979 1980 Total Collection Tu Year !:!."l'.. 1972 $299, l87 197) 32l, 048 L97 349,415 1975 652,89l 1976 789,074 l977 842,152 1978 872,589 1979 769,976 198 0 795,448 1981 8L8,479 TAB LE 4 PROPERTY TAX LF.VI~S AND COLLECTLONS LAST TEN FISCAL YEARS Current Cu r rent Collect lone Delinquent Tu •• Percent of Tu ~·~ Current Le2 ~·~ $295,980 98.9) )ll 320,855 99.94 (32) 349,284 99.9 41) 651,327 99, 76 87 77L,827 97 .8l 184 835,2l6 99.18 l, 557 869,648 99.66 2,234 765,452 99.41 4, 9 790,400 99. 37 •• 241 8L3,840 99. ) 3,854 (l >include• lntereat and penaltte1. Total Total Cotlectlons Tu u Percent of ~~ Cu r rent Le~ $296,291 99 .0) 320,823 99 .93 149,7S7 100.0l 6Sl,414 99. 77 772,0lt 97.84 836,773 99.36 87l,882 99.92 769,521 99.94 794,641 99.90 817,694 99 . 90 1) Taaea an levied on January 1 for eoltection in the fol lowing calendar yur. 2) Tax.ea are due and payable on January 1 and becoae delinquent for the ftut half payment on Mar ch 1, ae.cond half payaent on Auau•t 1, or full p,iyaent on Kay 1. l) Penaltie1 111euad after the delinquent date are 1/2 of U untll Au1u1t 1, 2/l of l l after Au1u1t 1. 4) After Octobe r 1, delinquent real eitate l1 1dvertlled for ••le. The t•• Hle h held 1bout Oeceaber of e1ch ye1r. 5) The collectln& aaent 11 Arapah oe County whi ch t' celvu a Ll colleC'tion fee for 1ecvl.ce1 rendered. Collection• 1hown are net ot the U: collectlon tee, escepl for th 1973 collection• whi ch are 1hOR 11 actual. Indicator # 7 REVE NUE EXCESSES OR SHORTFALLS ~ INC T~', lncreas, tn re¥en1Jt shortfllls u I pe n: • • of net oper1t Ing re,enu , .. ''"° 1 1•• .... 1 111 '''° 1 111 1 110 1 101 .... ... . .. ... . .. . ,. • ,o ... • Indicator +8 EX PENDITU RES PER C API T A CPI ONINC TR END· In c reasing " t oper,t1ng hpend1tures (conu1nt dollirs) per cop1t1 , ,,a ''" n,re ''" 0 I II 1111 191) l fU l tt, 191. 19" l lfl 1119 I t O I •t -59- • 0 I • • - ,o • • • ANNUAL FINANC IA L REPOR T CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO TAIL! 5 ASS!SS!O AND !STIMAT!O ACTUAL VAUJB or TAXAIL! PIIOP!RTY LAST T!N FISCAL Y!AJ.S Real Property Personal Prol!!;rtl UtlUtlea To tal Levy Aaeeued !.at. Actual Aeeeued !at. Actual .Ueaa~ Actual Aaseued --Eat. Ac tuel !!.!!. ~ ~ Value ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1972 64,887,050 216,256,8)) 12,073,090 73,257,450 3,918,330 13,061,100 80,878,470 302,175 , )8) 1973 70,325,520 234,418,400 13,33),830 80,811,091 4,354,570 14,51S,233 88,013,920 329,744,724 1974 75,260,120 250,841,979 13,557,376 81,0)4,637 4,996,940 15,157,603 9),814,436 34 7 ,034,219 197S 90,173,990 300,579,966 15,400,258 92,880,155 5,310,560 17,701,866 110,884,808 411,161,987 1976 96,849,190 322,830,6)3 18,116,818 109,798,897 6,054,090 20,180,)00 121,020,098 452,809,830 1977 98,672,810 328,909,367 20,S68,214 124,655,842 6,054,090 20,180,)00 125,295,114 473,745,509 1978 100,238,120 334,127,067 21,346,634 129,373,539 6,769,890 22,566,300 128,354,644 486,066, 906 1979 102,192,350 340,641,166 23,397,326 141,801,975 6,942,430 23,141,433 132,532,106 505,S84,574 1980 103 ,373,570 344,411,900 26,139,377 158,420,466 6,979,900 23,266, )33 136,442,847 526,098,699 1981 105,632,730 352,109,100 •20,694,958 125,423,980 8,091,690 26,972,300 134,419,378 504,505, )80 l. laal Property h •••••Hd at a l0% value for ta:dn1 purpoaea. 2. Pat'aoul Property h taxable on a variable rate -5% for inventory (19% -1971) and )01 for otheu. J. Utilitiea are •••••••d at a 30% value fot" taxina purpa1ea . Chana• in valuation Mthod directed by State Statute. Indicator #9 Indicator # 10 FIXED COSTS FRINGE BENEFITS WAR I TR[~~; lncreulog th•d co, H as • percenug. of nt oper&tlng ope I wru 10 .. 10 .. .... WARNI NG TREND : lncreutng frtng beneftl expenditures u • perctnU of ullrits &nd -..•9es , .. -+--------~ ... 1111 1au 1,·u 11 ·u ,,,, 1tn 1111 ,,,, 11.a 1111 ,,,, '''" ,,,. 1111 "'' ,,n 11,1 ''" t 110 11,1 -0- • • I • • - I I l f • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO 10 .... TA!IU: 6 PROPERTY TAX RAT ES PER $1000 AS SESSED VALUATION -ALL OVIIRLAPPING GOVERNMENTS LAST TEN FISCAL Yl!AllS School (l) Special Total Levy Colle.ctlon City of Tu Tu !!!!. !!!!. !nalewoo_! D1atr1ct County !!!,_etrict1 ..!!!!. TAX RAT E S 1971 1972 3.970 64 . 703 10. 700 .S20 79.893 1972 1973 3 . 970 68.822 10. 500 .480 83. 772 1973 1974 3. 970 68 . 360 9 . 700 .450 82.480 1974 1 975 3 . 970 S].430 8,800 .820 67.020 1975 1976 6,970 S6,480 8,800 1.000 73,BO 1976 1977 7,000 51. 9 20 9. 798 1. 940 70. 658 1977 1978 7 .000 53.100 8 . 769 ,418 69.297 19 78 197 9 6.000 52 . 900 9. 702 .436 68.038 1979 1980 6.000 48.870 9. 223 .455 64.549 1990 1981 6.000 51. 850 1), 329 .8 75 72 . 054 TA I L I V g s 1971 1972 $279,948 S4,627,299 $3,595,630 173 ,193 $ 8,676,070 1972 1973 2 99,187 5 ,186,567 4,0)4,655 183,6S9 9, 70),809 1973 1974 321,048 5,528,169 4,584,102 209,659 10,642,978 1974 1975 30,415 4,702,584 5,041,503 4S2, 805 10,546,)07 1975 1976 6 Sl,894 4,179,99 • 5,9ll,969 773 ,979 11, S21,836 1976 1977 789,074 4,461,371 8,0Sl,642 1 ,540,605 14,844,692 1977 1978 872,589 5,627,4)5 10, 9)1, 929 521 ,1 02 17,9 53,055 1979 1979 769,976 ), 721,17l ll, 167,212 559 ,515 18,218,574 1979 1990 795,449 5, •35, 730 12,227,)63 603 ,21S 19,061,756 1980 1991 91!,479 5,904,673 17 ,120,))8 l, 139,846 25,693,336 (1) A••r•a• of echool dlatr icu la the City proportioned \t7 au,aaad valuation for 1911 thru 1979 levy y,au . (2) !nal•v ood Ohtrlct 11 , doea not tncloda Sheridan or Cherry Creek for 1910 le..,. ye.ar. Indicator + 11 OPERA TING INCOME OR DEFICITS fncrus1n9 • unt of ntra1 fund operating doffc Its u • perctnU of nt operating revenues Indicator + 12 GENERAL FUND BALANCES WARNING TA[NO : cl lnin9 unrestricted fund bo hnco of general fund u a percont19 of not operating rovonuH •• ,, .• ,, ,,,. • • .,. ,,,, •• .,, .• , ••• ,. 11 10 •••• ttU till Illa 11ft lllt llll tlfl 1n1 1110 1111 -61- • I • • - • • • • ANN UAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO 1,600 .. ,oo .. ,,,, t ., • BILLED CURRE NT FISCAL ASS!SS H!H TS ~ OU! 1978 $112,293 1979 9 1 ,371 1980 141,778 1981 208,40 3 TABLE 7 CITY OF ENGLEWOOO SPECIAL ASS!SSH!NT COLLECTIONS CURRENT ASSESSH!NTS ~- $118,333 95,468 177 ,825 11 0 ,909 PERCENT OP COLLECTIO NS TO AMOUNT OUE 105% 98% 125% 82% tnforution required for thla table prlor to 1978 11 not readily avai lable . f1 ace 1 ....!.!!!.... Poe;ulat ton 1975 35,933 1976 36,564 19 77 36 ,645 TAB LE 8 COMPUATIV! IATIO OF l<MDED D!IT TO ASS!SS!D VALUES A1'D IOIID!D D!IT PU CAFITA LAST TEN PlSCAL tl!AJS8 Perc ent of Aaae ued Va lue •loaded londe d Debt to Bonded Debt Of laa l !a tate ~ ..... aaed Yalu! Per Ca,etta Sll0 ,8 ,808 $2 ,22 5 ,000 .0200 $ 61. 92 121,020 ,091 2,112,000 .0 174 57. 76 12S ,29 5,ll4 2,072 ,000 .0165 51,. 54 • C.neral obl taat t on bonde.d de bt only applieeble f or yaara ahO'll'ft for bit tan YNra. Indicator + 13 LIQUIDITY WAR Nl~G TREND , creu1ng 1110unt of cuh ind short•te,.,. 1 nves tlllents IS I P<'rtenUg<! of current 1hb111ttes ,,.,. ,,,, ,t,1 ttn ,,,. 1t1t ,, I II -2- Indicator + 14 LONG TERM DEBT lncreu1ng • ..,unt of ,..l dlrttt lon9 •ttno d bt IS • percen 1ge or 1Susstd ••lu1t1on ... _ ..... "--- ,,, .,,1 ltl4 .,. ..,. ..,, .• ,. ,,,. •• • I • • ,, - L l I • \,,.,J f • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO TABLE 9 COMPUTATION OF DIRECT AMO OVERLAPPING DEBT GENERAL OBLIGATIONS City o f Englewood General Obllgatton Water Bonde of 1978 and 1980 Leu : Water fund supported bo nd• School Ohtrlct No. 1 School Oiltrlct No. S Total di r ect & overlapptng debt Net Debt Outatandlna 7,955,000 1 1 955 1 000 92,09 7 ,000 TAB LE 10 Percentage Applicable to Covernaental Unit 100.000 100.000 Too.ooo 1.000 COMPUTATI~ OF LEGAL 0£8T IIARGIN DECEHIIEl31, 1981 Aaae1aed value Debt ll•lt -lZ of aauuad value Aaount of debt applic able to de bt Uatt Total bonded debt Leaa: Other debt 11or taae lnatatl•nt nole Water refundtna bond1 Sever refundtna t'evenue bonda Spec la 1 aueaaaent bond1 604,HS 7,955,000 2 ,776,000 1,576,)40 Got! Cout'se l onda Coaputer Leaae 465.000 __ 189,720 Legal debt u.rgln $12,772,3"0 794,235 13 ,566,575 Englewood' a Share of ~ 7,95 5 ,000 7,955,000 920,970 920,970 $13•,419,378 •,032,581 4,0Jl,581 lEacerpt [roa Se c tion 104 of th• KoM: Ruh Charte r of the City of !nglevood; tndt!btedne,a1 and obll&at1on1 of the C1ty shall be tncuned and llaiud •• provlded in Article Xt of the Con1tltutlon of the State of Colorado applicable to towna and clttea exc ept Al othervlae provided ln thh Charter. Counct.1 ahall have pover to h1ue aeneral obllgatlon bond• of the Ctty for any public capital purpoH, upon •J jor tty vo te of the uapayln& elector• of the City votlna thereon at a apecial electloo, provided. hovevar, that veter ••t.:n81 n and water iaproveNnt l>onda uy be htued without an e lection upon a deteraJnatlon to that t-ffect by Counctl . Th.e total ouutandtna a•n•ul o blt atl n lndebudneu of the r •ty, other then for vau r bonda, •hall not et any ttM eaceed thre perc ent (ll) or the aaae1aed velu.ttton of the tauble property ..,lthln the Clty •• 1h a by the bet precedlna •••e•• nt for taa: purpo1e1. Water boftda •~ll .. ture and be payable •• provtded by the ordlunre authorl&tn the hau.ance of ••U bonda. -63- • I • • - • ... • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO TABLE 11 llATIO OF ANNUAL DEBT SERV I CE EXP!ND!TUIES FOR GENERAL BONDED DEBT TO TOTAL GENERAL UP!ND!TUIES Fl seal ~r- l 976 1917 Prine lpal $111,000 40 ,000 ~ $9], 9l0 9l, 960 LAST TEN FISCAL YEAR S Pe r cent o f Debt Servi ce to *Total De bt Total Gene ra l Total General Servlce E&f.!nd lture a ..!._~ndlturea $206, 9l0 $1, 2]], 721 ,OJ lll, 960 8, lU, 978 .02 *General o bligatlon de bt 1ervtce ta only appli c abl e for ye.au ehovn for ha t ten ye ra . Indicator + 15 DEBT SERVICE WARNING TR(ND : I ncre,s ing AIIO unt of net direct debt service as • percentage of net ope rat fng reve-nues Indicator +16 OVERLAPPING DEBT WARN I NG TREND : Increased amount of overla pping long -te"" deb t as • percentage of 1ssessed valu1tion ••Tl IIPl 1974 111i 1111 1111 1111 1111 ltlO 1tl1 • I • • - I· l [ l • I ,, • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO TAAL! 12 U:VEIIUE BOND COVERAGE LAST T!N flSCAL tl!.US S!ll!a Met .. venue Groaa (3) Available for O.bt Service legutreMnt ~ -~e..!. !.speue Debt Service Principal !!'.!.!!!.!!. Total Coverage 1972 651, 20] 265,779 385,424 5S,OOO 17,161 72,161 5.14 1971 686,997 160,402 126, S9S 60,000 15,625 75,625 4.12 1974 I, 069,464 442,S21 626,941 60 ,000 ll,975 7l,97S 8.48 1975 838,669 494,211 J44,4S6 6S,OOO 85,788 ISO, 788 2. 28 1976 1, ll8,8SO 582, Sil 736,279 IJS,000 98,124 231,124 l.16 1977 2 ,48S,ll4 1,089,301 I, 196,033 145,000 91 , l 20 236,120 5 .91 1978 1,990,Sll l, 916,154 54,157 150,000 84,487 214,487 .23 1 979 2 ,406,606 2,217,754 161,047 160,000 77,666 217,666 .69 1980 2,601 ,102 2,656,007 (52,90S) 160,000 70, S28 230,S28 (.21) 1981 3 ,467,736 2 ,372,580 1,095,156 9 5,000 128,445 221,445 4 .90 WAT!a 1972 $1,160,067 398,llO 761,937 $155,000 $216,505 591,505 1,29 1973 l, )82, )24 442,228 940,096 175,000 189,6)4 564,634 1,66 1974 I, 100,149 627,771 672,378 390,000 177,418 567,418 1,19 1975 1,115,014 551,101 579,723 425,000 197,217 6 22,217 .93 1976 1,484,841 618,478 846,161 170,000 192,85] 562,8!1 1,50 1977 1,731,917 719,943 1 ,011,974 400,000 172,427 572,427 1.77 1978 3,129,284 1,254,941 1,874,343 ,U0,000 437,202 847,202 2. 21 1979 l, 218, 2'7 1,205,337 2,012, '16 0 545 ,000 493,675 1,038,675 1,94 1980 3,0ll,583 l , 107,876 1,705,707 605,000 512,270 1,117,270 1.53 1981 3 ,018,227 1,401,852 l,614,3H 650,000 512,738 1,162,7)8 I. 38 1) Whlla va t er bond a tuuad tn rec.ant yaar1 have been aeneral o bll&atton bond a, tt te the Clt)' •, 1tat1td intention to pay th.a debt Hr'll ca fro• the wa ter fund. 2) CroH revenue, lncluda tap fee,. )) ExcJudea deprecbtlon and lntere t u,pen e. Indicator + 17 UNFUNDED PENSION LIABILITY APNJNG IRE DJ IncrHslng toW>unl of unfundod pension pl1n l l1bi1 Hf ( •tsted beneftts) u • percen11ge of HSHsed ••lu1tton .. _ 1eu ,tu 1e,1 ,,,, ,,,, ,,,, ,., Indicator + 18 PENSION ASSETS R I TR£ 0 < Oecruslnq ••lue of pension phn nuts u I percenuge of benefits ~Id IIU •IU ••t • ttlt !Ill ltn ftl l 1ttt 11 • I • • •••• • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO TABLE 13 DEBT StRVICE REQUlREIIEIITS TO HATUlllTY -WATER AIID S!WER IIONDS WATER GENERAL o,LICATION AND REruNDINC 801'DS 8-1-7 8 8-1-80 Total !!!!.. ~ Prtndpal ~ Rote Principa l ~~t Requireaenu 1982 6.00 670,000 399,900 8.00 10 ,000 89,705 l, l6q,605 1983 6.00 710,000 359,700 8.00 10,000 88,905 1,168,605 1984 6.00 54S,OOO 317,100 8.00 10 ,000 88,1 05 960,205 1985 6.00 245,000 284,400 7 .80 250,000 87,305 866,705 1986 6.00 260,000 269,700 6.60 250,000 67,805 847,505 1987 6.00 275,000 254,100 6. 70 250,000 51,305 830,405 1988 6.00 300,000 2)7 ,600 6. 75 250,000 34,555 822,115 1989 6.00 3B,OOO 219,600 6.80 260,000 17 ,680 812,280 1990 6.00 345,000 200,700 545,700 1991 6.00 361,000 180,000 Y.5,000 1992 6.00 395,000 1)8,100 553,100 1993 6,00 420,000 U4 ,400 554,400 1994 6,00 445,000 109,200 154,200 1995 6.00 485,000 12,500 567,500 1996 6.00 515,000 53,400 568, 00 1997 6,00 375,000 22,500 397,500 I -------- $6,665.~ p, 2&2, 900 $l 1 29D 1 0DO 525,365 $11,763,265 SEWER REVENUE BONDS 0 Tout !!.!!. a.co PtJoctp•l lntenet Rue Principe~. lntereat !!i_U~'!.!,_~ 1982 5 .H 100,000 59,933 12.00 65,000 227,048 451, 81 1983 5. 75 110,000 54,182 12.00 120,000 186,812 470,994 1984 5. 70 110,000 47,858 12.00 130,000 172, lJ 460,271 1985 5. 70 125,000 41,587 12.00 145,000 156,812 46S, 399 1986 5. 70 130 ,000 34,463 12.00 165,000 139,41] 468,876 1987 5. 85 I 31,000 27,052 10. 50 180,000 119,612 461,664 19 8 6.00 1•1.000 19,115 10.ZS 200,000 100, 71) 464,828 19 9 6.10 151,000 10,455 10. 50 22S.OOO 80,212 470,667 1990 6. 21 16,000 1,000 10. 71 245 ,000 '6,588 318,5 8 1991 27S,OOO JO, 250 305,HO --------- l fJ1ft, __ l 292,..~5 l!, !,50 'JOO 1., 269,87) $ ,1'1Jfil UV!MU& N_D Total I Tear .... Prtn~t.1._al !!!_t_er_•-•.t • utnMnt1 !l,00 1),000 60, JI 7 75, ll 7 12.00 Jo,noo 49,900 79 , 9•l0 12.00 )5,000 6, JOO I, 00 12.00 ~.000 42,100 82,100 I 12.00 5, lO ll, JOO 12, 10.10 41,l)OO )1, lo, 9·)0 • • 10. 25 l\,000 27,175 12,IH 10. ,o,, 11,HI II, 5 I .H l\,000 15,137 10,n, 11. )), l,1'10 11,2 "· l 0,01 I • • l. I ' • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO Year 198 2 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 TAILt l3 <continued ) SPECIAL ASSESSMENT IONDS* ~1!.l .. ]?.~c}ig Pav1n1 Dhtrict 124 Pavlo& Dietrlct 125 Principal lntere1t Principal lntereat Principal lnte~ 10 ,071 5,000 1,313 30,578 10,071 5,000 1,050 30,578 10,071 5,000 788 30,578 10,071 5,000 5H 30,578 120,000 5,036 S,000 263 30,578 30,578 30,578 314,000 15,289 $120,000 ~ 1 25 ,000 L3 ,939 $314,000 $229,335 Pavtn1 Dhtrict 127 Dovntovn Iaprove .. nt Dhtrict !!!!. Prlnclpal !!.!!!!!!. Principal ~ 1982 s 14,768 $138,880 38,798 1983 40,000 10,730 80,000 21,713 1984 30,000 7,800 50,000 lS,312 l98S 30,000 s.so• 40,000 11,213 1986 20,000 3,180 40,000 7,852 1987 20,000 1,600 2S,OOO 4,4l3 1988 2S,OOO 2,22S 1989 1990 $140,000 ~ $398,800 $101, S26 Paving District 126 Principal Intere1t 9,706 8,551 8,551 8,551 8,551 8,551 8,551 8,551 81,000 ~ $ 81,000 ~ Total Reg,ulnMnta 24 9,034 207,693 lS8,000 141,442 240,460 90,142 66, JS4 337,840 85 1 27S $l 1 S76 1 340 •Bonda are callable on any tDtereat payaeot 4ata (Ju.oe l and O.C.eaber 1) except Pavlo& Dhtrict 127 (February l and lu1u•t l ) !!!!. 1982 $ 25 ,36 3 1983 26,927 1984 28,376 1985 30,014 19 6 ll, 746 19 7 JJ, \79 MOITCACI 1'STALUCEIIT ltOff S. 6B% ln.!.!.!!.!!. S 33,JS7 31,893 30, )44 28,706 26, t7 H,141 Ptlnct_.p~l ]7,94 17,944 l7.' ll, t 4 J7~ !.LJ--tl._20 Toul leg,ut raMnta !!!!. 58,720 1988 S8, 720 1989 58,720 1990 S8, 720 1'91 SS, 720 199 2 S8, 720 19') 1994 1995 1996 1'97 'l'OTAL COIIPUTH LIAS! lnl!,!!!.!,. f SI , 778 SI ,817 41,118 44,41' -~ f.2_42 1 150 -67- • Total Principal_ lntere1t hqutn .. nt1 $ 35,517 23,203 S8, 720 37,567 21, lS3 58,720 39,736 18,984 S8, 720 42,0JO 16,690 S8, 720 44,4S6 14,264 S8, 720 7,022 11,69 S8, 720 ... 736 8,984 S8, 720 S2,607 6, llJ S8, 720 SS,644 J,076 S8, 720 ~ ~ 24,640 f 604 1 SlS $)00 1 92S 90S 1 440 Total .. uin'!".2!!._a 95,722 89,761 86,062 82,362 --2!..'J.! • ~1.'t I • • - • I 00,000 H00,000 1400,000 U00,000 000,000 1 100,000 • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO TABLE 14 SUHlWlY OF DEBT SERVICE llEQUIIWIENTS TO MATURITY Sever Revenue and Revenue Fl1ca l Ceneul Obli1at ion ~-Water Refunding ...!!!!.... -~ 1982 1983 1984 198S 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1991 1994 199S 1996 1997 1,169,605 1,168,605 960,205 866,705 847,505 830,405 822,155 812,280 545,700 545,000 SSJ, 100 5S4, 400 554, zoo S67, 500 568,400 397 soo 4Sl,981 470,994 460,271 468,399 468,876 461,664 464,828 470,667 318,588 305, 2 SO Indicator + 19 WATER FUND GAINS OR LOSSES CPI WARNING TREND: Co ns is tent •nterprh• 1ains or losses cons lant do 1 la rs) Golf Courae Ute Tax Revenue ~ 75,317 79,900 81, JOO 82,100 82, JOO 76,900 82,175 81,538 80,237 83,250 Special A11e11aeot ~-- 249,034 207,691 158,100 141,UZ 240,460 90 ,142 66,JS4 337,840 85 ,27S ••00.000 1aoo,ooo I I00,000 1100- 0 -1100.-··-·--..... 00.000 -•-.ooo ,000 Mortgage Ins t al lmenL ~--- 58, 720 58, 720 58,720 58,720 58,720 S8, 720 S8 , 720 S , 720 58,720 58,720 58,720 58,720 58,720 58,720 58,720 24 640 Comput e r ~- $ 9S, 722 89,761 86,062 82,362 78,663 Indicator +20 z, 100,379 2,075,673 1,804 ,658 1,699,728 l,776,H4 l,SU ,831 1,494,132 1,761,045 1,088,HO 992,220 611,820 613 ,1 20 612,9 20 626 ,220 627, 120 422 14 0 SEWER FUND GAINS OR LOSSES CPI WARN ING TP[ND Consht•nt enterprise 11ins or losses consunt dol l trs) ltU I ll) I IT• 11$ UT I ltU 1111 1tlt I 10 ttll 1111 1ttl 11u ,,,$ 111• 11n 1111 ,,.,. 1110 1t1t -8- • • I I t I • • n • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT 110.000 , .. o. 130,000 110,000 1 10 ,000 0 -1 10 .000 -1 20.000 -1 ,0.000 140,000 State of Colorado Work.aen ' • Coapeneat ton Fund Co .. e r c hl-Unton Aaaurance Coapantu Coapau lnauranc e Coapany Granite State lnauranc e Coapany CoapaH lnauranc a Coapany CoaHrc ial-U nton Aaaurance Coapantea Co aerc ta 1-Unton Aaaunnc e Coapante a eo ... r c ht-UnJon Aaaunnc e Coapanfea Co 11Nrc tal -U nt on .Uauranc e Coapanlea UBL! 15 SCHJ!DULE OF lNSUIANCE IN FORCE !ND Of FISCAL Y!AJ. DECEMBER 31, 1981 TYPE OF COVEIAG! Workaen'a Coapenaation Fire ahd extended coverage, vandal ha and ul ictou1 •hchtef on all City-ovned buildings and contenu Ce:neral Liability !-.ceaa blanket cataatrophe liability Autoaobl le lnaurance loller , Machinery Inland Marine Valuable papen Account a rece t vable Indicator +21 GOLF COURSE FUND GAINS OR LOSSES CPI WARN ING TRE ND: Conshtent enterprise 9a1ns or losses (consunt dolhrs) Gener,1 fund Subsidy ~ ,., I\ I \ , \ I ' / \ I ' -----4------\.---· I I ,.,.. ... CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO LIMITS OF COVERAGE Fu ll Workaen'• Coapenutlon •• required by Colorado Statute• taployer'• Liab ility -$100,000 $29,997,182 (90%) $1,000 deduct l ble per oc cure nce $500,000 $5,000,000 and in exceu of $500,000 for 1n•urable riaka $500,000 $1,000,000 $323,970 $30,000 $200,000 EXPIRATI ON ~~ 1/1 /8 2 1/1 /8 2 1/1/82 1/1/82 1 /1 /82 1 /1/82 1/1/82 1 /1/8 2 Indicator +22 WARN ! TR[NO : PROPERTY VALUE CPI Oecl lnfng or neq1ttve grow th i n ,..rktl v1 lu of reside nt h 1, c°""'"rci, 1 or industrial property (const,nt do111rs) 19U ltll 1974 1119 111• !Ill 111 1 1111 1110 191 1 ttll 1111 Ill• lll6 !I l l t i ll 19 7 1 ltlt 1110 1111 -69- • I • • I - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO TABLE 16 ANIIUAL SALARIES All1l SUIIETY IOIIDS or PIIMCIPAL on1c1ALS AT DICBNIEI 31, 1981 Ma yor Mayor Pro Tea Other Councl l•n in aureaate City Manaaer Ae1lltant City Manaaer Ut1lltte1 Director Chief of Police Pite Chief Director of Librarla1 Director of Pinance Director of Park.a &. tecreatlon Director of Cotaunlty Developaent Director of Public Work.e Director of loatnaarlna S.rvlcea Director of Waetavater Traat-nt laployN lelatlone Director Ct ty Attorney Municipal Juda• Aaount of Surety lond $ 6,000 S,400 24,000 4), 900 H,000 33,000 36,300 34,000 30, )04 33,000 33,600 31, soo 36,300 32, soo 31,900 32,800 37,000 3),400 Su.taty bond requtra•nt of the City of lnalewood 11 Mt under a blank.et coapraben1lv1 policy cov1rntn1 all aaploJHI and e:1po1un1. The covar•a• h currently provided by Co •arclal-Unton U•urance Coapantee, ••piration date Jenuary 1, 1991, •• follow•: Poli cy MuabH· ACW-49-62-1 0 Cover!.I!. Llalta of Ltabl l tty faithful Perfor .. nce $100,000 llanUt Poaltlon lond -70- I • • - L I • I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO TABLE 17 1981 ASSESS!D YALUATID!I OP T!N LARGEST TAXPAYERS IN TH! CITY OP !NCLEWOOO .... •••• 14.0,; '440 t ..... -. ..... I ..... ! .... ,, .. IHI .... ·- 1. Capltal Alliance (Clnderella City) 2. Mountaln Bell ). Public Service of Colorado 4. Welbourne tnveataent Co . (Weet Oartaouth Warehoueee) S. General Iron Work.a 6. Wllkeraon Corp. 7. Plret National Bank of !n1tewood 8. Hugo and Helen Olaon (750 Weat llaapden) 9. !nglevood Jo1lln'• Store 10. l.iaberly-Wood1-Denver, Ltd. Indicator +23 GROSS RECEIPTS CPI WARNING TREND : Decline in business activity as ""'asured by gross business receipts MATHEMATICAL rOftMULATION: ........... ••c•••• , ......... ....,.., 1,u 111> 111• ,,,a 1111 1tn 1111 191'9 1110 1111 -71- I -i ::I -! 1170 IHO IIIO a110 ,,oo $ 5,816,590 4,848.700 2,538,000 1,736,180 l, 549,674 1,375,420 1,261,420 1,155,500 1 ,039,980 1.on,llo Indicator +24 WARNING TREND : RETAIL SALES CPI Decline in business octivity as measured by retail sales MATHIEIMTICAl fOAMULATION: "Mal aalee (c. ... taM ~rel 11,t l lf> lll4 1915 llll ltll •• ,. tlll ,,10 ,,., • I • • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO TAILZ 18 MlSC!l.LAN!OUS STATISTICAL DAU Date of Incorporation Date llo-Lale Charter allopted Pora of GovarnMnt Area -aquare a.ilea Milaa of atraeu and allaya Street• u1.,. Mile• of eawer luildlil,;•f'aita 197) 1974 l9H 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 •Inclu.dea Ii-City Sewer Plant fl re protection llueber of atattona 11uaber of aaplo:,Ne 111.aber of calla Police protection lhaber of ••lO)"MI Nuaber of law -.1olatlone Vebtcutar petrol unite Park.I and recreation Park.a -aaber aa.d acrae Medi.an 1trlp1 -ouaber •114 a c re, 11\aber of ••1-lna poola lluaber of aolf couraea Jlueber of Senior Cltian Cea.tan lducatloo (School Dlot<lct lo. I) -IHI• of ochoolo (bJ type) lluaber of teacher, 1'uaber of 1tudenu -72- -be• T.Tio 2,6)7 2,44) 2,392 2,659 2, 52) 2,532 2,401 2,282 2,242 Moy 9, 190) J u ly 8, 1958 Councl 1-Manaaer 6.65 116. 7) )9. 5 68.0 Value 1r,rrJ,442 20,005,139 13,480,922 za.111.111• 11,050,981 9,921,161 11,373,850 16,177,940 11. 111,00) 27,956,076 4 70 2, )75 99 29,190 J5 16 perU 101. 7 acree 2 otrlpo 2,00 acru 2 (l l-.. l outdoor) 1-18 bola, 234. 5 acraa l l hlah a chool 2 junto, hlah ochoola , •l••etatJ a ch.oole • 204 ), 59] I • • - I [ • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Water enterprlae ayatea Mu.abe.r of uaera Averaae annual uaage Plant capacity Sever enterprhe ey1tea lluaber of Upa Pbnt c apacity !aployee1 •• of Deceaber 31, 1980 Caf'eer S.rvke Syat•• '!x.eapt Total Popuhtlon 1990 cenaua 1970 cenaua 1960 ce:naua USO cenaua 1940 cenau1 lnco• level averaae Current populatlon eattute .. tat 1 aalea 1972 197] 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 Zontna cha1tfieatlon by area Staal • faall y realdentlal ho faaJly reatdent\al Mu ltt -fa•llY reatde.nttal ba l de ntlal and pf'o feaatodal au1 lne11 lrtcluautal Loe.a l •••fl " h.oai1: walue -73- • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO 10,585 2,879,270,000 gallon, 34 ailUon gallon• daily 35,341 20 alllton aallona per day l, 968 .4 309.4 275. 568 32.04) 415 . 9 1 ,0 95 .1 376 28 ~ 30,021 33,695 ll, )98 16,869 9,609 21,700 JO, 229 lOl,926,117 351,524,395 397,787,lll 415,039,940 526,)01,456 6)4,542,155 666, 160,6)0 787,275,493 851,190,240 1,0lt,463,227 I of Tot.al 48.05 7.)5 6. 74 .79 10.16 2 .11 $60,100 I • • - • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Flnanclal in1tttution1 Co•erd.al bank.a. number of lank depoatu, 12-31-81 Savina• , Loan U1oclatlon1, nuabe.r of 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 !lactr1.ctty Pieter, 13,314 13,'64 13,860 14,125 14,llS 14,597 14,664 14,703 14,802 14,912 15,266 -74- • • • Telephone• 17,295 17,938 18,445 18,530 18,61 5 22,199 22,549 21,834 21,909 22,145 22 ,286 CITY OF ENGLEWOOD CO LORADO 5 $301,866,000 6 C..1 ~ 10 ,71 0 10,790 10,856 10,865 10,874 11,003 11,010 11,031 11,101 ll, 179 11,330 1 I • • I I r r l I • • • pension and retirement funds • employees • policemen • firemen • I . . - I • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT I R LEHMAN, B U TTERWICK &COMPANY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of En 0 lewood, Colorado: We have examined the statements of net assets available for plan benefits of the Employees' Retirement Fund and the Policemen 's and Firemen's Pension Funds as of December 31 , 1981 and the related statement of chani;es in net assets available for plan benefits for the year then ended . Our e,:amination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly included such teats of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The financial statements of these funds for the year ended December 31, 1980, were examined by other auditors whose report dated Harch 31, 1981 expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. In our opinion, the aforementioned financial statements present fairly the net assets available for plan benefits of the Employees' Retirement Fund and the Policemen's and Firemen's Pension Funds at December 31, 1981, and the changes in their net assets available for plan benefits for the year then ended, in conformity with beneral ly accepted account in5 principles applied on a consistent basis. ~~vef ~a.,. "J ,1 tP.~. LElll'IAN, BUTTERWICK & COMPANY, P . C. Ma r ch 2 , 19 82 SIJIT • 1111 '"''"AHO ST A IT • ON 'AA K CfNT!U1L • Ol NV f A CO LOAAOO I0:!07 • ,,.ON l ~I 113 7'29 -p 1 - • I • • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO D!PLO'C!!S ' RETIREMENT FUND STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS AVAILABLE FOi. PLAN BENEFITS D!CEHl!I. 31, 1981 AND 1980 ASSETS Cash Due f roa City of Enalevood Olvidenda aod tntereat receivable lavea tae.nta, at u.rket, (coat $2,659,389 and $2,351,398, 1981 and 1980, reopectively) - note 2 LIABILITIES Account• payable Net aaaeta available for plan benefi ta ~ 1 980 $ 28,247 1,525 27,997 24 ,078 0 3),427 2,659,389 2,347,742 2,715,633 2,406,772 13 $2,715,633 $2 ,406 ,759 The acco an tn note1 are an int• rat rt of thla atateaent. -p 2 - • I • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO EMPLOYEES' llETlllEHENT FUND STATEMENTS OF CKAIIGES IN NET ASSETS AVAILABLE FOR PLAN BENEFITS YEARS ENDED DECEHIIER 31, 1981 AIID 1980 Net assets avallable for plan benefit• at beginning of year Addltlona Cl ty contrlbutlone Dividend and lntereat lncoae Caln (loe1) on aale of 1ecurltlea Total addltlona Deduct Lona kneflta pald Eacro.r agent feea Mi ace l laneoua Decrease ln urk.et value of aecurltiea Tota t deduct lone Net lncrea1e ln aaaeta avat lable for peoalon benefit• Net a1aet1 available for plan beneftta at end of year 1981 $2,406,759 339,984 254 ,061 (208 ,831) 385,214 58,134 12,188 6,018 76 ,340 )08,874 $2,715,633 1980 $1,872,464 295,431 198,404 105,342 599, 177 45,720 14,025 1,693 3 444 64,882 534,295 $2,406,759 ~..!,C_toapanyln& notea are In 1ntearat f>!Ct of thll ltateMnt. -p 3 - • I • • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CIT Y OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO POLIC!Hl!II' S P1!11Sl0tl P'UllD STAT!MENTS or N!T ASS!TS AYAlLAILI JOI. PLAN ll!N!FlTS D!C!lll!l ll, 1981 ARD 1980 ASSETS Cub Due froa Cl ty of llnslevood Dlvldend1 and lntereet receivable lnveetMnta, at aark.et (coat $1. 701,826 and Sl,458, 170, 1981 and 1980 reopectlvely) - note 2 LlAltLlTl!S Account, payable Jrle.t ,,,eta •••1lable for plan benefit• 1981 $ 18,188 25,597 1,701,826 l , 745,611 $1 ,745 ,611 1980 $ 1,069 14 ,08 3 25 ,148 1,457,128 -r.~ 8 ~1.497,420 !!!.!...•ccoapanytna not•• are ao lntearal part of thla at.ateae.nt. -p ' - • I • • - • • I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO POLICEMEN'S PENSION FUND STATEMENTS OF CI\AIICES IN NET ASSET S AVAILABLE FOil PLAN BEN EFITS YEARS ENDED DECEMIIEll 31, 1981 AND 1980 Net as se ts available for plan beneflta at beglnnlng of year Addlt lono Employee c:.o ntrl.butions City c:.ontrlbut1ona State of Colorado a l lotment Dividend and lntereat lncoae Gain (1011) on aale of 1ecurl tl ee Ml ac e l \aneoua Total addltlons Deduct lone Colorado Pol l ee/Fi re A.aaoc lat lon Beneflts pald Escrow agent fees Miacellaneoua Decrease ln aarket value of aecurltlea Total deduct lone Net increase ln assets available for penalon benefit• Net aaaets avat tab le for plan beneftta at en d of year $1,49 7 ,420 58 ,625 244 ,8 15 96,966 164, l 70 (118,922) I 290 446,944 189,113 8 ,210 1,430 198 ,753 248,191 $1,745 ,611 1980_ $1 ,1 72,467 55,044 229 ,852 97,118 126,340 43 ,008 2 161 553,523 22 ,322 195, IOI 9 ,070 1,035 1,042 228,570 324 ,953 S 1,497,420 The accoapanytng note• are 1ft lntearal part of thle 1tateMnt • -p 5 - • I • • n - • • • • . . • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND STAT!KENTS OF N!T ASS!TS AVAILIJIU: FOR PLAN B!N!PlTS DECEMll!R 31, 1981 AND 1980 ASS!TS Caeh Due fro• Clty of Englewood Dividend• and intere1t receivable Inveat.menta, •t aarket, (coat $2,704,450 and $2,468,890, 1981 and 1980 reopectlvely) -note 2 LllJIILITl!S Account.a payable Net assets available for plan benefit• 1981 28,885 38,863 2 ,704,450 2,772,198 ~2,772, 198 1980 $ 1,213 20 ,51 7 33 ,19 2 2 ,464,259 2 ,519,181 14 ~2 ,519,167 ~ accoapanytn g note, are an integral part of thi• 1tateaant. -p I • • In - - I ( • • • • ANN UAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND STATE'l!NTS OF CKAIIGES IN NET ASSETS AYAILA.BLE FOR PLAN BENEFITS Y!'.AllS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 AND 1980 Net aaseta available for plan beneflta at beginning of yur Addit lone !aployee con trlbutiona City contrlbutlone Volunteer Fire -Ci ty contribution State of Colorado allotment Dividend and interest income Cain (loea) on sale of aecurltlea Total add lt tone Deductlona leneflta pald !acrov agent feea Colorado Pollce/Fire Aeaoclatlon Miacellaneoua Deer•••• lo •rllet value of aecurltlea Total deduct tona Net increa se in a1aet1 available for penalon benefit• Net a11et1 aval lable for plan benef l ta at end of year 1981 $2 ,5 19,16 7 52,945 297 ,786 7 ,500 83,984 25Q,019 (217,505) 483,729 216 ,4 6 1 12,837 1,400 230 ,698 253 ,031 $2 ,77 2 ,198 1980 $1,992 ,377 54,018 303,824 7,500 84,108 206,020 11 0 ,737 766,207 201,601 15 ,11 0 16,675 1,400 4,6 31 239,417 526,790 $2,51 9,16 7 Tb• acco an in notea are an iota ral rt of thta 1tateMnt. -p 7 - I • • • • • A NUAL FINANCIAL REPOR T CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO CITY OF ENGLEWOOD EMPLOYEES' llETlll!!IENT FUND, AIID POLICEMEN'S A11D FIREMEN'S PENSIO!i FUNDS NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS December 31, 1981 and 1980 (1) Sumaary of Signlflcant Accounting Policiu • (a) ~1:tzation and General The Pollceaen'a and Plre.aen'1 Penaion Funds were e1tabltshed in acco rdance ..,1th Colorado State law and cover aubatantially all eaployees of each departaent. The City Council has ee tabliahe d separate policeaen's and f1:-eaen'1 be_nefit fund, to provide beneflt1 for peraanent disability lo exce11 of tho1e provided by the statutory fund. The City haa alao e1t1bll1hed a special fund known 11 the "Volunteer Flrefigbtera' Penaion Fund '" to provide beneflta to volunteer fir e- men. The Flrat National lank. of En1levood ia truatee for all of theae penaion fund ,. Annua l c ontrtbutlone t o theee funde by the eaployer. eaployee and the State of Colorado are not le•• than the ooraal c o•t of the •tatutory and benefit fund• plua the unfunded paat aervice coat of the benefit fund• amorth.ed over a 40-year per-lod. Poli c eaen'• and Fire.ae.n'• Peneion Funda have been funded 1.n accordance with atate atatutea. The City of Englewood haa a peoaion plan for eaployee1 of the City other than police.en, fire- aen, and elected official,. Annual contribution1 to the fund are not le•• than nonul coat plua the unfunded paet 1ervice coat aaortised over a ten year period. The plan ia currently funded aolely froa city contributiona. State law, effective January l, 1980• created a new retlreaent benef1.t plan for policemen and fireaen hired on or after April 8, 1978; created a nev death and dieability benefit plan for poltceaen and fire.sen, regardle•• of the tiae they were hired; and created a atate fire and police penaion a11ociation to adainiater tb.e nev plans and to perfora certain other functions relating to pollceaen'a and fire.en'• peoaiona. Policeaen and fire.en hire.d before April 8, 1978, uy voluntarily aaeoctate with the new rettreaent plan under certain clrcuaatancea, while those hired after April 8, 1978, are autoutically a1eociated with the new retireaent plan. !aployeea uy withdr w froa the retireaent plan and eetabl t1h their ovn alternative plan if certain conditlon1 are wet. The bill eatabliahed tnitlal eaployer and eaployee contribution rate• of 8%, whi c h are desi n d to eltainate any unfunded accrued liability over I forty year- period c oaaencin January 1, 1979. The atate aaeociation will deteratne further contribution• to the plan. The State of Colorado will c ontribute certain aaounta to be alloc.ated between the retireaent and death and dt.1ability plana, and all previou1 atate contribution for..-ulaa r e teratnated. (b) B!!..!.!. o_f_AccountlnA The ac:.coapanyfn ft.na nC'fal atateaenta ha"• been praparad on the a cc rua l aethod of a ccounttn • Plan lnv 1tMnt1 ar praaented at thatr fa1r ur:ket. value. (c) Accuaulated Plan llenefiu Ac <uaulated plan b4tnefit• are thoH futvro perlodic pa,-nto, lncludina l uap -oua dhtrlbutlono, vhich are attrll>ut• la un.dar the Plana' provt.eton1 to the aarvic:e e eployae1 have rendered to the benefit inforutlon dou. c-latd pin lMneflU lncludo bneflto oxpectad to bo paid to (1) retired or ter•lnoted •PI OJIH or thotr b4tneftc1ar1ao, (11) bo1toflclarlt1 of aployoao w o have died, and (111) p raoont aployo • or thalr boneficlariao. Ion fito nJ«r t oo-rgucy r.a- plOJH plan an baa d on apl oy ao' c noatlon durlna their l aot 60 cono cutlvo calendar ntho of credlt4td aervtce. The accumulated pla n be:n.aflt1 for a c:t lva ea ploJ ea are baaed on their '" raa c o•pen tlon durl tho 60 conooc utlvo c a lendar 1001th1 1ndln1 on t date ao of wbi ch tha b n flt infor.att n 1• pre1ented (Januar1 1. 1 2). Al for t Pollc.eMn'• a nd PireMn'• plane, both the an tt, and t • e ctuaulated plan Mn.ef1ta are bat d on n, year of credit• 1arvice. hneflt• payablt under all cir ua tance1 -retlr••nt 1 d ath, dla1biltty, and teratnatton of apl oy nt - aro lnclud d, to th extent th y ore d .. , ottrlbutablo to .. ploy, Ht•lca rendered t th valu- ation d•to. A •-r, of acc umulated pla n a flu II ptHIDUd 1 Poli < n Plr n fitll ta urr 1ly U1 i) I • • n - I I I • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO The actuarial present value of accuaulated plan benefit• ia derived froa an actuarial study, and la that a11<>unt that re1ult1 froa applying actuarial aaauaptiona to adjust the accuaulated plan benefit• to reflect the tiae value of eoney (through diacounta for intereat) and the probability of payment (by aeana of decreM.nta auch •• for retlreaent. death, dlaability, or teraination) between the valuation date and the expected date of payaent. The aignlflcant actuarial aasuap- tiona uaed in the valuation aa of January l, 1982 were (1) life expectancy of partlclpanta (the 1971 Group Annutty Mortality Table projected to 197S), (11) retlreaent age auuaptlona, and (ll ! ) lnveataent return. The retlreaent age for non-eaergency eaployeea la age 65, for pollce.aen it 1 a age 55 and 20 years of credlted aervice, or 25 yeara of credite.d aervice, and for fire.en it ta age 50 and 20 yeara of credited aervlce. The aaauaed average rate, of return were 6% for the Non-Eae rgency taployeee plan, and 7.5% for both the Policeaen'a and Fireaen 'a plane. (2) lnve1taent1 lnv"e1tae'nt8 at Deceaber 31, 1981, are au .. a:rized •• followa: Eaployeea' Retireaent Fund United Statea Governaental Securitiea Pol lceaen' • Penalon Fund Unlted Sta tea Covernae.ntal Se.curt t lea Fireaen' 1 Pena ion Fund United State• Covernaeotal Securitlea lnveataenta at Deceaber 31, 1980, are IUIIIM.rized aa follows : lluaber of Eaployeea' ltetireaent Fund Franklin Mutual Fundo: United Statea Covernaental Securttl•• l.eaurch !qui ty Fund Franlr.lln Money Fund Short Ten Securltie1 Pollce•n'1 Pen1lo11 Fund franklin 'lutual Fund.: United ta tea CoverDa11:ntal ecurltiea l.uurch !qui tf fund Franklin Money Fund hort Ten Securltlea rt r1Mn' • Pena ion Pund Franklin Mutual Punda: United Statu Govarl\Mntal Securlt!u l.uearch Equity fund Franklin ney fund Short Tera S.curtt lu Uni ta 167,068 176,470 3,08S 1~4,039 0 1 662 125,699 89,029 1,944 2~M 2& I 9 165,889 198,727 3,273 !0;1 uo 47 039 -p 9 - $1, ll4,S69 l, 109, 70S l,085 124, 0)9 $2, lSl, l9 818,415 SS9, 985 1,944 S7 1 826 $1,106,472 1,249,995 l,273 __ 10,11so £...46~ Coat and Market Value $ 2,659,389 1...! .. r..?.Q.1-.,~ $ 2,704,450 $1,117,682 l, 102, 91 l,085 124.0)9 $2,3"$ $ o, 929 55 ,434 1,939 57,826 fl,457, 128 U, 109, 7'S 1,242,041 l, 273 .....J.2!,150 ~z.•tt•,'M I • • I I I I I I I ( • • - cities of englewood and littleton bi-city treatment plant joint venture • I . . - l I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .COLORADO I ~LEHMAN, C::::::::, BUTTERWICK a._,.._ .. _ .. & COMPANY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS The Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of Englewood, Colorado: We have examined the balance sheet of the Cities of Englewood and Littleton Bi-City Treatment Plant Joint Venture as of December 31, 1981, and the related statements of operations, changes in venturers' equity, and changes in financial position for the year then ended. Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing pro- cedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The financial statements of the Joint Venture for the year ended December 31, 1980, were examined by other auditors whose opinion dated March 31, 1981, on those statements was qualified as being subject to the effects, if any, of such adjustments as mi g ht have been required upon review of project costs by 6 r ntor agencies. ln our opinion, the aforementioned financial statements present fairly the financial position of the Cities of Englewo od and Littleton Bi-City Treat- ment Plant Joint Venture at December 31, 1981, and the results of its opera- tions and the c han6 es in its financial position for the year then ended in conformity with generally a c cepted accountln~ principles applied on a con- sistent basis. Karch 26, 1982 SUIT -• 1115 """"AHO &TR lT • 'AR C(NTRAl • OI NV(l'I , C0l0l'IAD0 IOl02 • ,H • 8 1 - • C30ll 11)1' I • • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO CIT! ES OF ENGLEWOOD AllD LITTLETON BI-CITY TllEATIIENT PLANT JOINT VENTUR! llALARC! SHEETS DECEMIEll 31, 1981 AllD 1980 ASSETS CU IUlENT ASS!TS Receivable froa other aovernaent• lle.celvable fro• joint venturer - City of Littleton Mi1cellaneou1 receivable• Prepaid expeneea Total current aaaet1 PllOPl!lTY, PLANT AND !QUlPKENT (Note l) Treataeat Plant Land Other depreciable aa1et1 Conatructlon tn proareaa Leaa accuaulated depreciation Net property. plant and equipaent LIAll!LITI!S AND JOINT V!NTUR!llS' !QU!TI CUllll!IIT LIAll 1L 1 Tl IS Central caah overdraft Accounu payable Payable to joint venturer - Cl ty of Littleton Payable to joint vent11rer - City of !nalowood Total current llabllltl•• TlNG!NT LIAll!LlTI (Note 2) JOINT V! TUR!lS' !QU!TY ( tu l and 2) Cl ty of tnal• d City of Littleton Total jotnt venturer•• equity OP llATl S Al/D HAlNT!NAHC t:lVI 1981 1,017,225 285,934 11,518 1,314,677 21,712,183 1,216,828 620,623 l, 758 1 612 25,308,246 2,489,827 22,818,419 $24,133,096 $ 555,611 406,988 50,987 1,013,58 11,539,755 11,53 ,755 23,079,510 40,000 $24, 133,o<I 1980 1,243,473 145 1,243,618 21,710 ,297 1,216,828 550,301 93,220 23,570,646 1,975,877 21,594,769 $22,838,387 $ 603,504 160,116 62, 16 1 l), 171 961,407 '!be acco-eanytn1 note• are ao lnta1ral pert of thla 1tate•nt. -8 2 - • I • • - L L I • I I • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOO D .COLORADO CITIES OF ENGLEWOOD AND LITTLETON Bl-CITY TUAT!l!.NT PLANT JOINT VENTURE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 AND 1980 1981 OPE RATING SU BSlDY PROK JOINT V!NTUR!llS $3 ,071,427 OPERATING EXPENSES Sewage treat•ent 2,885 ,1 13 Adalnlatration and general e ,cpen1ea 110,665 2 ,295 ,778 lNCOHE FROH OPE RATIONS BEFORE DEPRE CIATlON 75 ,649 Depree lat ton (513,950) LOSS FROH OPE RATI ONS (438 ,301) OTllER !NCOHJI (!XPENSJI) lntere1t expense (85,964) Mi1cel taneoua income 10,315 NET LOSS s (513,950) '"'• acco an ln notea are an lnt• rat rt of thta atateMnt. -a 1980 $2 ,681 ,549 2,453,733 106,312 2 ,560 ,045 121,504 (498 ,653) (377,149) (1)), 792) 12,288 (498,653) I • - • • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD CO LORADO Joint V~nturera' Equtty CITll!S OF ENGLEWOOD AND LITTLETON BI-CITY TllEATIIENT PLANT JOINT VENTUU STATEM ENT OF CIIAIIGES IN JOINT VENTURERS' EQUITY FOR Till! Yl!ilS 1!:ND!D D!Cl!:Hll!l 31, 1981 AND 1980 City of City of Lit~~ !nalevood Total $10,981,282 $10,981,282 December 31, 1979 S2 I, 96 2 ,564 186 ,535 186,534 (249 ,327} (249,326) Contrlbutiona 373,069 et t.ooa (4 98,653 ) Joint Venture r1' tquity 10,918,490 10 ,918,490 Deceaber 31, 1980 21,836,980 878,240 878 ,240 Contribution• I, 756,480 (256 ,975) (256 ,975) Net LOH (513,950) Joint Venturer,' Equity $11,539,755 $11,539 ,755 Deceaber 31, 1981 $23 ,079,510 ~-•cc:o an 1n note• are an lntearal part of thla atateaent. -B 4 - I • • • • • • ANNUAL FINANC IAL REPORT CITY OF ENGLE WOOD COLORADO CITIES OF ENGLEWOOD AND LITTLETON Bl-CITY TREA1'MENT PLANT JOINT V!IITUll STATEMENTS Of CIIANGES IN FlNAIICIAL POSITION FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 AND 1980 SOURCES OF WORJCING CAPITAL Net Loss Item not requiring working capital Depree t.atlon Working capital provided by operatlona Contribution froa Ctty of Englewood Contri bution froa City of Littleton Capt tal grant from Federal Governaent Capital grant fro• State Governaent Total sources of working capital USES OF WORJCING CAPITAL bturn of advance• -City of Englewood Return of advance, -City of Littleton Ile turn of cont rt button -State of Colorado Additions to plant and equipaent Total uaes of working capital INCREASE IN IIORJCING CAPITAL 1/0IUtlNG CAPITAL JANUARY l WOIUtING CAPITAL DECEMBER 31 INCRE AS E (DECREA E) IN WORKING CAPITAL REPRESENTED BY lnc reaae (decreaae) in current asset• ltecelvable froa Joint Ventur r -Littleton lteceiveble froa other Covernaenta Mt1cellaneoua re ce tvable1 Prepaid expenaPS tncre.aae (de c reaae) 1n current ltabtlitle a Ca 1h ove rdraft Account, pay 1bJ1 Payable to City of Littl@ton Payabla to Clty of tnalevood $ (513,950) 513,950 616,752 616,75 2 531,279 I, 764,783 8,303 1,737 ,600 1,745,903 18,880 282 ,21 l ~ 301,091 S 285,934 (22 6,24 8) (145) 11 1 5 18 7 1,059 (47 ,891) 246 , 72 (62,616) (84, 18•) 52, J7q INC I ASg UI WORK I NG CAPITAL :$=::l::8~,8:::8:::0 -I 5 • (498,6 53) 498,653 186,534 186,535 299,025 95,908 768,002 197,46 7 197,467 266,644 661,578 106 ,4 24 175,787 282 ,21 1 $ (123,780) 394 ,934 (65) 271,089 135,852 (50, )15) 2,616 16,512 164,665 106, 24 I • • - • • • • ANNUAL INANCIAL REPORT CITIES OF ENGLEWOOD AND LITTLETON BI-CITY TUATl!ENT PLAIID JOINT V'EIITUU MOTES TO P lNAIIClAL STAT!M!NTS DECEMBER 31, 1981 AND 1980 (1) SUMIWlY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNT1NG POLI CIES (a) Orgentzatlon and Operation• CIT Y OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO The Citle1 of Littleton and Englewood, Colorado, for-d thia joint venture for the conatructlon and operation of a joint u1e waatew-.ster treataent facility. Cranta froa the federal and state gov e rnme nt ,, respectively, provide fo r approximately SS% and 2S% of the con1tructlon coot1. The fac1 Hty 11 owned equally by the Cit 1u. Operating coat, of the joint •enture are 1ubaidlzed by the C1t1eo baaed on utluted uoage of the plant. During 1980, 66% of the operating co1to vere billed to !nglevood and 34% to Littleton. Durtn1 1981, the operatin1 co at percentage• billed were 60% and 40 %, reopectlvoly. Deproclotion 11 not billed to the venturers. (b) Jolnt Venturero' Equity Crant1 froa the federal and atate aovernaenta to the Cltiea regardtna projec t conatruction are treated •• increases in the joint venturera' equity account,. The coabined contri- butlona ot theae aovernMnto totalled $18,487,108 and $17,964,132 at Decoaber )1, 1981 ond 1980, roapectlvely. Advancu by the Citlu to be rotaburaed by aranto are included ln payable, to joint vent urers in the accoapanying balance aheet and the relate d grant, are t.ncluded ln recelvablea fro• other aovernaente. (c) Dapraclot lon Depreciat i on 11 coaputed uaing the etrataht -llne Mthod over eatlaated u1eful live, of the a11et1 •• follova : Treataent plant Vehicleo Laboratory equtpaont Other (2) COIIT!IIGl:IIT Ll.UIL!TY SO yura 2-a 1 .. r. S-10 , .... 2-7 yoaro federal and otate copttal aranto are aubjoct to final rovtov and approval by the arantor •a•ndH. Tho ottocu of ony araot adjuttMnta vh1ch uy ba propoaod by th arantor •a•nctoo ore not pra1ontly dotor- al.noble. I • • I • • - housing authority of the city of englewood annual financial report fiscal year ended december 31, 1981 • I . - I I I I • Bo rd of Commission rs Thomas J. Burns, Ch irman B tty Bir, Vic -Chail'1118n B verly J, Br dsh w R v r nd J. Stanly Fixt r Cynthia Petrson • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT Housing Authority City of Englewood For Year Ended December 31, 1981 Ex cutive Director Fr nces Buck Jonas In I • • n - • • • • Housing Authority City of Englewood • March 31, 1982 Board of Co111Dissioners Housing Authority of the City of Englewood 3400 S. Elat i Street Englewood ,Colorado 80110 Phone (303 ) 761-11 40 Enclosed is the Financial Report prepared by the City of Englewood for the year ending December 31, 1981. This report presents the financial status of all accounts operated by the Housing Authority of the City of Englewood. This is in compliance with the agreement with the City of Englewood who handles all accounting for the Housing Authority's programs. The opinion of Lehman, Butterwick & Co., P.C., Certified Public Accountants, is contained herein. I am sure you will find the attached report helpful and informative. Sincerely yours, Frances Buck Jonas Executive Director FBJ:cla Enclosure s • I • • - • I I • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS Report of Certified Public Accountants, Lehman, Butterwick & Co., P.C. Combining Balance Sheet Combining Statement of Income and Fund Balance/Retained Earnings Statement of Changes in Financial Position -Simon Center Notes to Financial Statements -H l - • .. I • • - I Fl LEHMAN , BUTTERWICK • __ _._.__. & COMPANY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS The Board of Directors City of En 6 lewood Housing Authority: • • • We have examined the com bi ning balance sheet of the City of Englewood Hous- ing Autho rity as of December 31, 1981 and the related combining statements of income (loss) and fund balance (deficit)/retained ea rnings, and the statement of changes in finan c ial position for the year then ended. Our e xamination was ma de in ac co rdance with gen r ally accepted a uditing stan- dards, and accordingly included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we consi d ered necessary in the circum- stances . In ou r opinion the aforementioned financial statements present fairly the financia l position of the City of C:ngle wo od Housing Authority at December 31 , 1981 and the r es ults of its o perations and the changes in its financial position for the year then end e d, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles applied on a basis consistent wit h that of the p r eceding year . The accompanying statement of r e v en ues , e xpenditures , encumbrances and changes in fund balance -bud get and actual for the year ended Decemb r 31, 1981 is pr esen t e d for purposes of additional analysis and is not a re4uir d p rt of the financial statem nts. This statement has been subjected to th uditing procedures applied in th examination of the financial statem nt and , in our opinion , is fairly st ted in all mate rial re spects lo r lat ion to th financial sta t em nts takeu a a whol e. stated in of forming o opinion on th basic The sch dul s whi ch comprls th th Table of Cont nts r~ present d requlrt!d part of th bulc flnanci 1 baa is of ccount in~ l t m nta ta~en •• whol , account In nd Urb n acrib d or p rmitt d by th rch 2 , 19 2 WITI •1115 A A'AHO fTII IT •O'" '"'II C NTIIAL • 0 NII CO AOO • II 2 - • I • • - l • "'---' • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ROUSING AIJ'lltORITY COHlllNING IALAIICll SKEET DECEHll!ll 31, 1981 WITK COKPilATIV! TOTALS POI. 1980 CURRENT ASSETS: Ca 1h and inveetaente held by City of !nglewood Caah wl t h paying agent Current port ton o f rehabl 1 ltatlon l o ans (note 2) lntere at receivable Du e fro• other governaente Du e f roe o ther funds Prepaid reotala Depoait on land pur c haae To tal current a11et1 REIIAB1L1TAT10N LOANS RECElVABL!: (note 2) ADVANCE S FOi FUTUU: CONSTRUCTION RESTUCTED ASSETS : Centra l c aah reatrlcted •• bond reaerve (note )) Central caah reatrlc ted-aroH lncoM f und Centra l c aah reatrlc ted-.alntenanc e fund Ce n t ra l c.aah re1tdc ted for loan def lc lency (note 2 ) To ta l reetd c ted ••••t• PIO PU TY , PLANT l.llll !QU IPKEllT, AT COST 1 Land lut l dtna• rurnt.tu t e and ft.at ure1 Ope rat lna eq ulpaent L••• a c:c:1.111ul1ted de prec lat t.on LIAJlLlTl!S , CONTll llUTlON S I.Ill) FUND IALAN Q/ UTAlN!D !AIUl!llGS: CUt. T LI AJ I L ITllS: t>eferred t.nco .. -prepaid t11tere1 t C\l rr1nt t n.et a l l M nta of lon1-t•r• O bt (notH 2 and 3) A crued lnttrea t Account, paya ble D\lt to other fund.a Adva nce a f roe fadera l aovernMnt Depoolte Total curt·•nt lt ablltt t e a GPJIEllAL ~ $ 6,0 48 6,048 4n ~ ~ $ 6,471 I. G-T!IU1 O!IT, !lCLU DIMG CU IUNT INSTALi,~ MTS• !lot•• payable to ba n • (Go t • 2) Houaln.a revan~ bond 1 pey abl•• lnclud t n1 proalu. of S15, 20 (note l) CO IIUTIOII A UNO IALAN /UTAlM D • IAllll 51 Contrtbutt n fro• St at e of Colorado Co ntrl!Ntton fro• City of h alevood C ntrlbutton f ro• S1aon C.n.ter Pu"4 lelon,•(Deflclt)/ .. uh,ed !arntna• 19, 06 Proar•• S!:CTlON 8 SlHOII llNTAL C!:NTEI ~ 191,000 $2 6,399 8,190 232 ,191 2 3,450 431,381 49,849 200 ,000 16,807 34 ,056 ----no;-8 6 J 208,409 2 ,45 1,955 20 ,648 4 ,79 9 18,401 2 ,69 9,413 4,799 (282 ,923) --- 2 ,4 16,490 $3 ,098 .734 70,000 19,10 7 ,178 1,9 7 ,28S 100,000 08, 04 ~ $54 ,648 JO,H9 REIIA81Ll- TATION PUBLI C ~ ROUSING_ 56 ,080 $68 ,9 36 19 ,351 1 ,416 20 ,9 19 97 766 68,9 36 768,707 132,584 8 1 111 __ .!lo.!.!! 18 5 ,638 18Lll8 ----~ WR7, lb8 $254 , \74 28 $ I• 2 . ~7 I, 302 002, /\,(~ 90,()()/) ), 1,4(1() ll2, 191 22 ,000 TOTAL llli 348 ,46 3 8,190 19 ,351 1,4 16 20 ,919 232 ,19 1 23 ,450 6 53 ,980 76 8,707 132,584 200 ,000 16,807 )4 ,056 83 , 11 l ))),97 4 394 ,047 2 ,451,9 55 25 ,872 18,401 2 ,890,275 !282 ,92)) 2 1 b07 1 352 $4.4%,597 28 602,981 I, 7 ,28S TOTAL 1980 38 3 ,902 8 ,486 12,356 1,460 16,06 4 2 1,238 2 1 ,000 4 70 ,506 6 39,708 200,000 16 ,131 22 ,704 83 ,02 7 322 ,462 208 ,409 2 ,450 ,8 11 20,728 21 ,466 2 ,70 1,414 !226 1 356) 2 ,475 .058 p ,907 , 734 2,059,3 8 I • • I r:t n • - • • CITY or IUICLEIIOOD IIOUSIIC .t.UTIIOlITY COMBINING STAT!MEIIT or INCOME (LOSS) .\Ill) ruJID MLAIICll(DEPICIT)/UT.UN!D !AIUIINGS rot TU Yt:.Al IUll)lr.D DECEl9El 31, 1981 VITII COIIPAUTIVE TOTALS P0a 1980 Pro1r•• UCT!OII 8 UILU!Ll- C!lff:IW. SUGI UNTAL UTION PUBLIC 1981 1980 ~ CEIIT&l SITISIDY ~ HOUSING ~ TOTAL OPEIL\TlNG UV!NU!: lent $120,350 $ $ $120,3)0 $106,724 t.eot eub1idtea (note 4) 281,157 303,642 584,799 481,319 Loan 1ubddle1 238,330 238,330 115,266 lntereat on loan• ---1Ll1! ----1.!...ill -11,..ill. 401. 507 303,642 278,108 983,2 57 726 ,794 OPE UTIIC D.P!MS!S, EXCLUDING D!PUCIATIOll 1 Adaint1trat loa. (note 5) 10,337 46,809 33,081 63,328 12,921 166,476 120,490 1 Subaidle.1 265,464 62,778 328 ,242 270 ,736 Supplieo 6,475 7 ,059 1,109 14,643 2,271 Util lt te1 40,326 40 ,326 38 ,854 lnaurao.ce 5,532 5 ,532 3,638 lepalro 13,650 13,650 13 ,805 Other ~ ~~ 10,33i 120,592 298,545 133,165 14,030 576 ,669~ I1"COME (LOSS) rtOM OPIIL\TIOIIS l!,OU D!:PUClATlON (10,337) 280,915 5,097 144,943 (14,030) 406,588 262 ,283 DEPUCIATIOII ..1.2Ll!!) (56,567) (56 ,551) INCOME (LOSS) l'lOM DPIIL\TIOIIS ill:Jlr> 224.348 5,D97 144 ,943 (14,030) H0 ,021 205 1 737 OTUl INCOME (UP!H!:) !arntna• on depo1tt1 400 64,143 5,133 24 ,034 7,D31 100,341 75,82D lnter11t upenae (135,434) (35,042) (5 ,634) (175,710) 157,173 Sub11dJ froa Slaon Center l0,D39 (ID,039) 6,785 Other lncoea --1,..lli __hfil ___ tiff IIICONZ (LOSS) 102 146,912 10,230 133,935 (12,633) 278 ,546 131,164 l'UIID ULAIICI! (DIPICIT)/UU!IED !AUIICS, IIG!NllllC DP TL\l ill.1..lli.> 325,140 __..!1,_lli_ 157,587 (19,083) 39 3 ,992 262 ,829 l'UIID IALAIICI (DEPICIT)/UTA!M!D EAU11CS, !:IID or nu $(83 ,439) $472,052 ~ $291,522 $ .il!..1.!!> $672 ,538 $393 ,993 -------- s« accoapeoytoa not•• to f 1naa.ctal 1tat ... nt1. ) • I • • -H 4 - • • - I I • • • • • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD IIOUSING AIJTIIOIITY STATEMENT OF ClWIGiS IN FINANCIAL POSITION -SIMOII CZNT!I. FOR TIii: YURS EIIO!O O!C!KB!I. 31, 1981 AIIO 1980 SOUllCE OF WOIUtING CAPITAL: Met lncoee lte• not requtrlna vorklna capital Depree lat ton Work.in& capital pro•lded by operation, USES OF WOBIIIG CAPITAL : Addi t ion, to property, plant and equtpaent lncreaae in reatri cted 111et1 leductlon, in lon.1 -terw debt Tout u1e1 of vorktna eapital INCUAS! IN WOBINC CAPITAL WOKING CAPITAL -JAIIUAI.T l WOKING CAPITAL -O!C!lll!R 31 INCl!ASE IN WOlllNG CAPITAL lll'US!NT!D IY : lncr111e in current a11et1 Caah and lnv11tMnt1 lncre11e (decr1111) in current llabllitt.11 Current in1tallaent1 of lona-tera debt Accrued tntereat Account• payable Depo1it1 INCUASZ IN WOKING CAPITAL $146,912 ~ 203 ,479 1,489 11,428 ___B_._!Q1 85,020 118,459 212,329 $330,788 $123,670 5 ,000 (638) I, 152 _illl) -1...lli l!.!!..ill. Sea 1cc oapanytn1 notea to f!nanc lal 1tat1Mnta. -H 5 - • $ 97,890 ~ ~ 1,203 11 ,453 ~ 80,()1,3 74 ,378 __!!!_,lli $212 ,329 74,51 l 5,000 (6 ,56)) I , 8ft 210 __ 1_)_5 $ 74 ,378 I • • I- NOT! l NOTE 2 • • • CITY OP ENGL!IIOOD ROUSING AIJTIIOIITY NOTES TO PINAIICIAL ST.\T!M!NTS Deceaber Jl, 1981 and 1980 SI.IOl.uY OF SIGNIFIC.\lrr ACCOUNTING POLICI!S •• Ac count lna Method Tbe ftunclal etateaent• are pre.aente.d on the. accrual ba• l• of account to.a. b. Property, Plant and gquipaent Property• plant and equlpaent la a ta tad at co1t. Depre- ciation on the apartaent1 for the elderly (Slaon Center buildtn1) and equlpaent la COllf'IUted on the atralaht-lina aethod baaed on e1tluted uaeful 11••• •• followa: luildlng Purniture and fixture• Oparatlna equtpaent c. Pr1alU11 on Sala of Bonda 50 yura 2 -5 youo 5 year, Praaiua received on the 1ala of houatna ravanua bond, la Nina aaortl11d over the 11••• of the bond1 u1tn1 the boo.de outatandtna Mthod. d. Cub ln Cuotody of the Clty of Zn1lowood Cu b of the .\uthorlty lo poo!od vlth caoh of tho Clty of !aalevood for lnftat. .. at purpoMI. UllilILIT,.TlOII LOAII PIOGIWI The Roualna 4uthor1ty al\d Clty Councll ha•• ••t•bllebecl • loea proaraa tor rebabllttatlon of pri•ate hoae.• for low-inc re- a14enta . Criteria for obtalnia.a t.he.M lo•n• lnclt.Mle owaerel'lltp, realdea.cy, n,atahborhood aft!l...al locoee, 1.4utty ha realMac• and the condition of tM raa1Nt\C.e. Vertol.le repe,-.et M lhod• are ••all.able to the borrower, elthoueb .... rally loau are repaid o••r • period not to eaceed twenty , .. r,. toaoe are llalted to $17 ,SOO per dwelltna unit or $40,000 per borrower. To financa th••• rehabt lttatton loan•, the •uthorit1 bee recet•ed line• of c redit tn. the aaou.nt• of $4!>0,000 elld $lSO,OOO fro• vat'l- oua ban.ka ln the coaaualty. Ml tncli•id.ua l loan., ere cloNd, the Authority obtain.• not•• •a•tnet the line• of credit whi ch are re- oevable every two year, ead are to M re,.td tn a ccordance vtth the tet'M of th• eupporttna rehabllttatlon loan, Mde by th• Au- thority.. 'Tb••• note• c.arry a ••l-.. latet'eat rate of 81 and -H 6 - I • • - NOTE J l I • • • • • • are secured by the lndlvldual note, and truet deed, resulting fro• the r ~habtlitatlon loan• u.de by the Authority. Ar Oec~11ber 31, 1981, there vere $147,198 of note• outstanding al 6.251 lnt@reat, and $474,251 at 81 intereat. Of the origi- nal $800,000 credit aval lable, appro&L .. tely $60,000 of un- coa1ltted credit re .. tna available at Deceeber )1, 1981, vhlch wt ll e splre on June l, 1982. ln addltton, certain aaounta are required to be reatrlcted t o provide neceaaary funds to the bank.a to rt!!pay loana ln exce,a of proceed• derlYed froa fore- ctoaure. At year end, theae aaounta are repreaented by $83,111 of reatrkted c .aah. IIOUSI NC RIIVtNUE BONDS During Deceaber, 1978, the A.uthodty haued revenue bonds whlc h v ere ueed to 11cqulre the Staon Center, en apartMnt coaples. for 1enlor clthen• who realde tn the Ctty of Englewood. lntere•t on thr bond• 1• payable •e•l -annually on June land Deceaber l . The bond• are c a llable at a preaiua of 11 on Decellbet' 1, 1988, and are 1ecured by a ft rat lien on the reYenue of the coaplex. includtna rental aaalatance payaent•• a fter operation and uin- tenance co1t1 ha•e been patd. Pur•uant to the ter• of the load baolutton. an aaount eqlll l to the •Ill-.. annual debt aervl c e haa been depoalted Lo a bood re- aerve a ccount a• aecur1 ty for the pa,-.nt of principal and inter- eaL on the nd1. Tht1 reaerve , tn the aaount of $200,000, 11 included in reatrlc t.e.d aaaeta tn the a ccoapany 1na balanc e ahe.et. Maturh lea of prlnct pal are •• foll ov1 : 1982 1983 1984 198~ 198 6-1 990 1991-199S I 99 b-l 998 $ 70 ,000 7S,OOO 80,000 8S,OOO Sl0,000 690,000 sn,ooo $2,042,000 1A1a ~urrent M turtt iea 70 1 000 -H 7 - • lnt•reat bite 6.)0% 6.)0l 6.)0% 6.)0l 6.30% 6,30 -6,60l 6,6S -6, 7Sl I • • - IIOTI 4 llOft s • • • • • • PIOGUII COll'l'UCfS The Ct tJ .ntered 1ato a contract vlth t.ha Departaeo.t of Bouelq aa.d UrNa De•elopaeat to provide hou.eloa aa1latanca ,.,._ta , and aubMquentlJ aaataaed tbia contract to the Authorlt:,. lhlder thia c ontract, tbe A.uthorlty 1 .... 1 the mrlta to lower 1ac.o- l•••l al4arly faaillea, aDd BUD provldea ra11tal aaalataace ,-,._c, t o the Authority oa behalf of the occupaata . Tb.a llou.elua MlthorltJ baa alao racal•ad a sraat fro. the Depart- -at o f lloualo1 alld UrNn Dtt•alopaeat to provide reat.al aaalat- ance f or cert.ala low lnco-faaillaa. Tba Authority la aubject t.o audit by BUD to dataraine c oapllanca with proaraa ral"l&tloaa. ULAT'IO PARTY Tbo ln1l-d Rouoln1 Authort tJ lo provldod office opaco , accouatlq 1arvlca1, and all perlODUl bJ tbe City of ln1lwood. Tbo Authority poyo tbo City for tuoo urvtco.o. Tota l fuo potd to tbo City for tbo Joor oadod Doc .. ber 31 , 19'0 wro 08,840 end $107,224 for tbo :,oar ODdod Doc-r 31, 19'1 . -H 8 - • I I • • - I I • • - ; englewood downtown , development authority annual financial report fiscal year ended december 31, 1981 • I . . - • • • • ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT For Year Ended December 31, 1981 ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Board of Directors Barbara Holthaus, Chairman Barry Coleman, Secretary Cletus Gasson, Treasurer Jeanette Bush DeWayne Glenn Fred Kaufman Ken Mausolf John Maxwell John Neal Rachel Owens Bi 11 Pendleton ~onard Robohm Ex cutiv Director Michael Haviland I • • - ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN DEVHOl'MEN T AUTHOlltT Y 3535 S Sherman S1rm Englewood Colorodo 80110 • • • Phonc303 781 -7885 1 -------------------- • • Board of Directors Englewood Downtown Development Authority Dear Board Members: April 1 9, 198 2 The Annual Financial Report for the year ended December 31 , 1981 is submitted herewith. The Financial Report has been prepa r ed by the City of Englewood's Finance Department in compliance with the Agreem nt between the City of Englewood and the Englewood Downtown Developm nt Authority. Th opinion of Lehman, Butterwick and Company, Certified Public Ac co untants is contained herein. I am sur you will find the report both helpful and informativ . Respectfully submitted, ~kl~ Mi chal K. Haviland Ex cutive Director • • I • I • • • • TABLE OF CONTENTS 1, Report of Certified Public Accountants, Lehman, Butterwick, & Co., P.C. 2. Combined Balance Sheet, 3, 4. 5. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Unreserved Fund Balance, Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, Encumbrances and Changes in Fund Balance -Budget and Actual, Notes to Financial Statements. -0 l - • 0 I • • - • • • • • I ~LEHMAN , C::::, BUTTERWICK •-------· & COMPANY CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS The Board of Directors Englewood, Colorado, Downtown Development Authority: We have examined the combined balance sheet of the Englewood, Colorado, Downtown Develop.nent Authority as of December 31, 1981 and the related statement of general fund revenues, expenditures, and changes in unreserved fund balance for the year then ended. Our examination was made in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, and accordingly included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we conside red necessary in the circumstances. In our opinion, the aforementioned financial statements present fairly the financial position of the Englewood, Colorado, Downtown Development Author- ity at December 31, 1981 and the results of its operations for the year then ended in conformity with gene rally accepted accounting principles which have been applied on a basis consistent with that of the precedin6 year. The accompanying statement of revenues, expenditures, encumbrances and changes in fund balance -bud g et and actual for the year ended December 31, 1981 is present e d fo r vurposes of additional analysis and is noL a r equired part of the financial s tat eme nts, This statement has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the examination of the financial statements and , in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial s tatem nts taken as a whole. ~~/ ~~··,t ~C-r-;,./ ~<!. LEHMAN, BUTTERWICK & COMPANY , P.C. Karch 26, 19 2 UIT( • t51S olAol~AHOf STAC£l • ~AR C "T .. l • O(N\1£A , COLOAolOO I0201 • ~H ( f :)031 513 71 -0 2 - • u I I n I • • - l I I r • • • • • ENGLEWOOD, COLOIAOO, OO\l!ITOW!i O!V!LOPMl!IIT AUTIIORITY COIIII IM!D IALAIICI! SK!ET D!C!Ml!ll 31, 1981 WITII COMPAllATIV! TOTALS POil DECEMBER 31, 1980 Total a General General (lleaorandua Dn1I) General Pi:ud Long-Tera Decellber 31 Deceaber ~ Al•eta Debt 1981 1980 -----ASSETS CUIUlEMT ASSETS : Ce ntral c ash and investaent a 24 ,730 $ s 24, 7)0 33 , J37 Dep o1 tt1 455 455 10 ,000 Du e fro• g o vernaenta 920 920 1,259 Property taxe s receivable leas uncotlecttblea 11 1,759 111,759 118,765 Prepa i d int e res t ___ 2_3_1 __ 2_3_1 Total curre nt aaa e ta 13 8,095 138 ,095 ~ Pro perty• plant and e qut paent 69,276 69,276 53 ,4 16 Amount to be prov ide d for payaent of long-term deb t 34 064 ~ -1hQB 1!_3 ,09S $69 ,27 U4 064 1_241 ,435 S252 ,859 LIABI LI TIES CUllllEM T LlAl l LlTl!S: Curre nt tnatall•nta of note pa y able (n o t e 2) $ l,275 2 ,275 2 ,019 Accounts payable !,010 2 ,0 10 78) Due to City of !ngtowood 500 Deferred property tax revenu ...!...!..!.J.i'!. _l_l_!_...l?.2. _!..!! 11,s Total c 1rr•11l lla llltlu l ll, /69 2,;• 1 II ~o .. ~ 122 ,0 7 ote payabl• 1u:\...,dtn1 curr•nt tnotall .. ntl (note 2) 31 71i~ ~~4- ll, 78 -1..£,ffi )4_._()h_l ~ _J _U __ Ul.!!_ ______ lnveatHnt tn &ll!oe ral ftud •••t• $b9 ,l7b S h9,276 $ S),416 fund balanco: Re1erv• for en 1M1ihr n, ,.., 2 ,640 Un reeerved 2 ., J.?h l:.,lli 4~6n 1 . ..,.~o o9 i /h _:.t l..bQl. t.?_9 L ' i,:t1'1111ll •nt (no t , . ) $_I _8,1!,~, ~., 11 .. ,uu $ ', I ._.ls $7 l !S~ •• -0 3 - • 31 I • • - • • • • • ENGLEWOOD, COLO llAOO, DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTIIORlTY GENERAL FUND ST ATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CIIA!IGES IN UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1981 WITH COMPAUTIVE TOTALS FOR DECEMBER 31, 1980 REVENUES Property tax Speclflc ovnerahlp tu !arn1ng1 on tnve1t•ent1 Mi1cellaneou1 Cain on eale o! capt.tal a1sete UP NDlTUIES Per1on.al 1ervlce1 Off lee auppllu Ope ratlng aaterla\1 and 1upplle1 Profe11lona l aervtcea (note )) !ducatt.onal, travel, and proaotlonal 1ervlce1 Coaaunlcattona and utilltle1 lental1 Furniture, ftaturea and equtpaent Parking lot developeent Aid to other agenctea lntere,t e•penae Hia cella.neoua EXCESS or !XPENDITUllS OVEl REVENUES UNlE !lVED FU I E-JA!o~'AllY l U !llVED F'U l~~C!-D Ct:.'Ul •R 31 -0 .. - 1981 $1 IR ,b.8 10,78 .. b ,487 333 --11..ill 148,700 Jb,9 ), 3\ I 9S2 b ),411 6 ,1~ l ,8 4 7 ,44 J JOO 15 ,669 2 , soo 17 ,9 b -2.i.llQ .J.hl.....6 8 7 ( 18, 87) 2 ,fH O __ l..,_h.11 :.._. l.~b • ~ SI I .l:!ft 11, 55 14,b02 73 I ) 1 f:~I -0,61 ),47} 1,90 , .. ,. •• J70 l ,2bfi , 70 10 ,4 7 9 ,000 , 9)4 Jb2 ----1..,..Qfil l_OO 121 (57 ,000) (~ .~-0) !!£, 11 !.....!'.1.:21 I • • - l ' • • • • ,· • ENGLEWOOD, COLOllADO, OOIIIITOWN D!YELOPIIENT AUTIIOIITY C!ll!RAL FUND STATl!KENT OF llVENU!S, EXPENDI'rul!.S, ENCUMBRANCES AND CIWICES IN FUND IIAUNCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL D.U l!ND!D DECEllll!R 31, 1981 llYENUES Property taa Specific ovner1hip t.ax ta.rnt.n11 on tnve1t ... nt1 Cain on 1ale of a11et1 Mi ace l laneou1 Tota 1 levenue1 !XPENOITUIIES ~ ENCUIIIIRANCl!S Per1onal aervtce1 Office auppllu Opent ln1 aatorlala and auppllea Profe11tonal 1ervlce1 (note l) !ducatloul, travel and proaotloul 1ervtca1 Co-.i.nt c at t.on1 and ut l 1 lt tea lantah Purnltura, fl•ture1 and equlpaent Parkin& lot developaent an.d laproveaenll Aid to other 11encte1 l11tere 1l ••P•n•e Mi ace\ laneou1 Total !spandlturu leveouea (un der) xp ndlturea FUND BALANCE -JANUAllY l SI 18,900 10,000 5,000 __m. 134,750 40 ,517 3,375 300 64,000 7 ,000 ~.99' 8,000 n.119 2 ,000 l.!,000 ----1.Q!l. 16~.b07 (34 ,857) $1 18 ,648 10,784 6,487 12,448 __ill 36 ,1 48 ), 151 952 61,611 , 243 ~.AR• 7 ,4.) 100 15,66 2 ,500 J 7, b _ ~.9\0 _16~.o.1 (16,14 7) ~ Actual Over (Under) ludget (252) 784 1,487 12 ,448 ___illl) (4 ,369) (24) 652 (2 ,389) (757) (1 ,11 2) (5H) )01) ,6 50) \00 s; 996 -1..lli ~) I ,510 P1M> IA.LANCE -DEC El 31 $ 1, . .!L $ _61!..Q -0 5 - • I • • tn - • • • • !NCLEWOOD, COLORADO, DOWNTOWN DEV ELO PKEN T AUTIIORITY NOTI!S TO FlNANCl AL STAT!H!NTS DEC!HB!R 31, 1981 (1) Sua .. ry of Slgnlflcant Ac counting Pollclu a. Organlzat lon. Th e Authority waa created by an o rdinance passed Oc tober 16, 1978 , by the Ci ty Council of the City of Englevood under authoriza ti on of State Statutes. lbe purpoae of the Authority ta to prevent de- terloratlon of property va lue.a v1t hln the ce ntral bualneas distr ict of the City through proaotton of its development and redeveloP11ent. b. count lng Method. The f lnancla l 1ta teaent1 of the Gener• I Fund are presented on the aodi fte d accr-ual baais of accounting. Under thte aethod, e xpendt- turea are recorded when ltabllltlea are incu rred, and revenues are reco['ded v hen rece ived ln caah, unless 11u1ceptible to accrual, that t,. aea1urable and available to finance the Aut hority 's ope ratt ona. Fixed a1aet1 are recorded as expendtturett tn the General Fund and are capttalh.ed at cost in the General Fixed A.s1et1 Group of A.c count1. Such a11et1 are not depreciated. c . Central Caah and lnv~ataent1. Ca1h of the Autho rity is pooled wl th ca ah of the vartoua funds of the City of Englev ood f o r tnveataent purpo1e1. d. Property Ta 11.. Proper ty t,u.e1 are levied on property by Noveab•r of each year, and are due ln full the following year. Property t 1te1 are collected by Arapahoe County, and then reaitted to the Authority. Such ta•ea are recorded at a re ceivable and deferr d revenue , and 1ubaeque.ntly re cognlz.td •• revenue when aa~ aval lable to the Authority. (2) Mote Payable The A.uthorlty 11 obligated on a 121: note, duP tn aonthly ln1tallaent11 of $520, lnclud\ng lntere1t, through November, 1985, v hen the reaalntng prln- clpal and lnterut beco11u du• and pay ble In full. The Dece11ber ll, 1981 balance con1ltt1 of current lnat t lwnt1 in the aou11 t of $2,27'\ and • 10111-t•r• belar\ ff of $)1, 789. Th• n Olfl la eerurt>d b,· unlaproved land. -0 I • • - [ I I I I ' • • • • (3) llelated Party The City of Englewood provide• accountlna and financial service• for the Authority. No fee lo charaed by the Clty for theoe aervlceo. (4) Leaae eo-1taent The Authority lea•e• office epace uaed for general ope.rations. The future alnl-lease payment ao of 0.ceaber 31, 1981, lo $1,820 for 1982. -D 7 - I • • - / llluotriltion, f Propos d [/( i •n Objl· t!v..,,, tor Si<lrritt P1r, I Jllutrtino Pr r f DA nt - • I I I • • • I . • • In - / Illu tr Ill n of Pr 1 ,t.l ii, i n Objt·ctiv~ tor Sh·rritt P.1rk I lllu r1ti n c Pr b I• t Iv nt I J I L l I ,,_._ I I I • • - I . • • r • • • P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS , small business is the cornerstone of our free enterprise system a n d , since the birth of this country , h as repre- sented opportuni t y , i n dependence , and the fulfillment of dreams for generations of Americans; and WHEREAS, combining the dynamic forces of individual initiative with an alertness to consumer needs , small business increases the flexibility of our economic system and is a leading source of innovation and technological advancement for much of our industry; and WHEREAS, we are indebted to small business for its contribu- tions to our success as a nation and dependent on its progress and vitality for our economic well-being; and WHEREAS, small firms employ over half of the labor force; they are leaders in employment creation and innovation and have an important role in expanding economic opportunities for women and minorities; and WHEREAS, historically, small firms have enjoyed a special relationship with their communities; they will be leaders in the renaissance of their communitie~ and in the forefront of revitaliz- ing the economy and bringing an w s ns of direction to the /\merican people. NOW, THEREFORE, I, EUGE EL. OTIS, Mayor of the City of Englewood , Colorado , doh reby proclaim the week beginning May 9, 1982 as SMALL BUSINESS WEEK in th City of Englewood. I call upon every citizen of our City to join m in this tribute. GIVEN under my hand and seal this 3rd day of May, 1982. I • •