HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-10-18 (Regular) Meeting Agenda•
• •
c,~v council Meeting
October 18, 1982
Regular
0
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
October 18 1 1982
•
• •
RESOLtITION # 42, 43, 44, 45, 46
ORDINANCE # fa'£. y. y;, 45, 46
•
0
0
I . •
-
•
•
RE GULAR MEETING:
•
• •
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Ci ty of Englewood, Colorado
October 18, 1982
I~
The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe Coun-
ty, Colorado, met in regular session at 7:30 p.m. on October 18, 1982.
Mayor Ot i s, presiding, called the meeting to orde r .
The invocation was given by Council Member Fitzpatrick.
The pledge of allegiance was led by Boy Scout Troop No. 92.
Mayor Otis asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll,
the following were present:
Counc il Members Higday, Neal, F i tzpat~ick, Weist,
Bil o, Bradshaw, Otis.
Absent: None.
The Mayor declared a quorum present.
* * * * * * *
Also present were: Act i ng City Manager Vargas
City Attorney DeWitt
Fir e Ch i ef Broman
Deputy Ci ty Cl erk Watkins
* * * * * * *
COU NCIL MEMBER BRAD S HAW MOVED TO APPR OVE THE MI NUTES OF
THE REGULAR MEETI NG OF OCTOBER 4 , 1982 . Council Me mb er Fitzpatrick
seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Abstain:
Council Members Higday , Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist , Bilo, Bradshaw.
None.
Mayor Otis .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * * *
I • •
In
-
•
October 18, 1982
Page 2
•
• •
COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO BRING FORWARD AGENDA ITEM
7A -AN ORDINANCE CONCERNING AMUSEMENT DEVICES. Council Member
Bila seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote re-
sulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday , Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bila, Bradshaw, Otis.
None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
City Attorney DeWitt stated Item 7A was an ordinance for
the control of amusement establishments, commonly known as the
amusement device ordinance. The ordinance provides for the
definition of certain types of establishments, provides for the
licensing thereof and monitors certain activities that take place
therein.
Council Member Bradshaw prefaced her motion by stating in
light of the numerous phone calls that have come in it would be
wise to table this particular council bill to allow more input from
the different people involved.
COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO TABLE COUNCIL BILL NO.
41, SERIES OF 1982. Council Member Bilo seconded the motion.
Council Member Neal proposed to hear from the people who
came down to address the ordinance.
Council Member Bradshaw stated the reason to table was to
form a committee made up of owners, council members, representa-
tives from the schools , and the City Attorney or his designee to
study and make recommendations to Council by the November 15th
meeting.
Council Member Higday and Council Member Fitzpatrick spoke
in favor of tabling the council bill.
Council Member Neal suggested a motion to suspend the
rules and allow for pre-scheduled visitors and other visitors to
address the specific ordinance.
Council Member Bilo withdrew his second to the motion to
able Council Bill No. 41. Council Member Bradshaw withdrew her
motion to table.
COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ALLOW ANY PRE-SCHEDULED
VISITORS THAT CAME TO SPEAK ON THIS PARTICULAR ORDINANCE, AGENDA
ITEM 7A TO SPEAK NOW. Council M mber Silo second d h motion •
I • •
October 18, 1982
Page 3
----~
•
• •
Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Silo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
Mayor Otis called for the pre-scheduled speakers.
Craig Matthies and Floyd Matthies, 1496 South Osage, and
business address of Cosmos, 3932 South Broadway, came forward. Mr.
Floyd Matthies went through the ordinance. On 9-2-2 (d) he did not
see too much difference between pool and billard tables; and it was
a matter of opinion of whether a person liked video games or
bowling alleys.
On 9-2-5 (b), Mr. Floyd Matt hies did not understand the
definition of manager. Mr. Matthie s stated the federal law
entitles 18 year olds to vote, serve in the armed services, but yet
they were not allowed to seek employment in these places .
On 9-2-5 (b), (7i , Mr. Matth ies question the 1,000 foot
limit and how it would apply to game rooms in shopping centers.
On 9-2-8, Mr. Matthies understood a license fee increase
but was against doubling the amount . He was against the $75.00
investigation fee on the basis it was unjustifiable.
On 9-2-15 (2) Mr. Matthies stated he could not enforce the
disturbances off his premises.
Regarding Section 3 whi ch contained the emergency clause,
Mr. Matthies stated it would be difficult to enforce keeping kids
out because of the year-round school hours and kids on vacation.
Mr. Matthies stated the controls by this ordinance were
defeating the purpose of keeping kids in your neighborhood. They
would go somewhere and take their money out of Englewood.
Council Member Neal discussed Mr. Matthies objection to
the license fee . Mr. Neal stated the fee in theory was to provide
enforcement services for the disturbance activites which Mr.
Ma hies was objecting to also. Mr. Neal stated this was a con-
tr diction . Mr. N al sta ed Mr. Matthies does not want any dis-
turbances but he is unwilling to pay for the fees wh ich ar suppos
to pay to k ep th disturbances down .
•
I • •
•
October 18, 1982
Page 4
•
• •
Craig Matthies stated they just feel limited as to what
they can do outside their premises.
Craig Matthies explained their Bible study session on
Tu e sday or Wednesday mornings. Mr. Matthies stated they were
try i ng to reach out to kids and operating a video game room was a
means. The intention was not to encourage problems such as
d i tching school in order to play video games.
Mayor Otis asked for the next speaker.
Ron Monroe, Manager, Bumpers, Ci nderella City, 70 1 Wes t
Hampden Avenue, came forward. Mr. Monroe was representing h i mse lf
and Mr. Drazen, the owner. Mr. Monroe stated he had been i n the
education field for several years and thought the best place for
k i ds to be during the school term was in school. He expressed
concern about keeping kids out of the amusement centers when they
a re on vacation from school referring to Concept 6, year-round
sc hoo l . Mr. Monroe stated the ordinance was unfair to these kids.
Mr. Monro e stated he has spoken at career fairs held at schools and
stated today's technology in video games can open doors for kids
who want to go into electrical engineering or graphics.
Mr. Monroe opposed the licensing fee and the clause pro-
hibiting kids from coming into the amusement centers during cer-
tain hours of the day.
Mr. Monroe stated Mr. Drazen wanted to go on record that
he did not receive any notification of this change in ordinance and
feels it is a violation of his constitutional rights as a business -
man.
Co unc il Member Fitzpatrick asked if Mr. Monroe had ever
questioned any of the students in his establishment if they were
ditching school.
Mr. Monroe stated he does
kids are truant because of school.
or in a park or wherever kids go.
because they are having a Pac-Man
wanting to be away from school .
talk to them . Mr. Monroe stated
They may end up in the arcade
They are truant from school no
attack, but becaus they ar
Council Member Fitzpatrick stated all the ordinances th~t
the City passes are published in th Engle wood Sentinel .
COU NCIL MEMB ER WEIST MOVED TO GO BACK TO THE REGULAR
AGENDA UNDER "PRE-SCHEDULED VISITORS" FOR ITEMS A, 8, ANO C IN
LIGHT OF THE TIME AN D SO ME OF THE PARENTS MAY BE EXPECTING SOME OF
THE CHILDRE N HOME BEFORE THIS HOUR. Council M mber Fitzpa rick
•
I • •
•
•
October 18, 1982
Page 5
•
• •
seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
Nays: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * * *
Pre-scheduled visitors, Firefighters Don Schoenbein and
Randy Pickrel, were in attendance to present the award prizes to
the winners of the 1982 Fire Prevention Poster Contest. Mayor Otis
viewed the winning posters and presented the honors to the child-
ren.
* * * * * * *
Pre-scheduled visitors, Mr. Allan Fleming and Ms. Jody
Bachelor, were present. Mayor Otis presented Mr. Fleming and Ms.
Bachelor with a citizens award for saving Mrs. June Hively's life
during a fire in Mrs. Hively's Englewood home.
* * * * * * *
COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO APPROVE A PROCLAMATION
DECLARING OCTOBER 17 -23, 1982, AS NATIONAL BUSINESS WOMEN'S WEEK.
Council Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll,
the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
Pre-scheduled visitor, Debbie Van Epps, President of the
Englewood Business and Professional Women's Club, was not present
to accept the proclamation.
Mayor Otis instructed staff to see that the women's club
received the proclamation.
* * * * * * *
The Council returned to discussion on amusement ordinance •
•
I • •
•
•
•
• •
--
October 18, 1982
Page 6
Mr. Raymond Miller, 936 E. 18th, Denver, attorney
appearing on behalf of pre-scheduled visitor, Richard Babich of
1537 West Alamade, came forward. Mr. Miller stated Mr. Babish
operated Automated Amusements and distributed amusement devices.
Mr. Miller stated the goals of the proposed ordinance were
laudable; however he had some problems with some of the provisions.
Mr. Miller objected to the time limitation being too restrictive.
Mr. Miller stated the licensing procedure was too restrictive, one
violation and the license can be revoked. Mr. Miller stated there
were truancy laws to enforce keeping kids in school. Mr. Miller
stated this enforcement should be placed on the parents and school
officials not the businessman. Mr. Miller stated there are manda-
tory school attendance laws. Further some of the arcades are in
shopping malls are governed as to the hours they can stay open.
Council Member Neal asked if Mr. Miller had any objec-
tion to Section 9-2-15 (2) which in some fashion makes an operator
reponsible for what is happing immediately around him.
Mr. Miller stated it goes to imposing a burden which is
rightful, but there were ordinances outside the licensing provision
to handle these problems. Mr. Mil ler stated the objection was not
with the goal but with the burden and where it is placed.
Mayor Otis called for the next speaker.
Mr. Robert Briola, Bob's Grocery, 3296 South Washington,
came for ward. Mr. Briola stated he was interested in the topic
because he had 3 machines; however, he had not had enough time to
think over the ordinance.
Mayor Otis called for the next speaker.
Evan Lipstein, 7000 w. 14th , Lakewood, came forward. Mr.
Lipstein was representing Bally Manufactu ring Company, the Funway
Freeway Amusement Center in Cinderella City . Mr. Lipstein ob-
jected to the discretion given the Director of Finance in licens-
i ng the establishments. Mr. Lipstein question the 1,000 foot
li mi tation. Mr. Lipstein asked for a clearer definition of light-
i ng requirements. Mr. Lipstein agreed with Mr. Miller in that the
t i me limit was too restrictive.
Mayor Otis called the next speaker.
Mark Norek, 4975 South Logan, came for ward. Mr. Norek
stated he was a buyer/merchandiser for Southland Corporation for
Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico. Mr. Norek stated he agreed with
he comments made thus far against the ordinance. He agreed to
na c t some sort of committee from the business community , from the
•
I • •
-
•
October 18, 1982
Page 7
•
• •
Englewood community, from City Council, and he would be glad to
discuss 7-ll's past experience in the video business and Sileo West
which is 7-ll's representative in the video amusement game busi-
ness, to put our recommendations, our time and energy with the
Council and any committee that wants to meet to fix this situation
and in a sense that everyone is happy with what's going on in the
community with video and pinballs, arcades, or whatever.
Council Member Bilo asked how he lighted his machine
area.
Mr. Norek stated we have asked t he managers to take a
couple of lights out in the game areas and to dim out only certain
areas.
Mayor Otis called the next speaker.
Joe Mc Govern, 2280 South Xanadu Wa y, Suite 230, with the
regional offices of Show Bi z P i zza Place. He agreed with Mr.
Miller about the restrictiv e time l i mi t. Mr. McGovern stated he
did a substantial business t hr o ugho u t the day with day care
centers, moms and dads bring i ng in ch i ldren, etc. Mr. McGovern
stated he remembered what he was doing back in Hawai i when he wa s
cutting school. It was not sipp i ng Coke and playing video game s .
He wished it had been because he might have saved four or five
years of his life.
Mayor Oti s s ta t e d Council wa s not satisfied with th e
present ordinan c e. The au tho r of th e council bill has offered to
table it and set up a comm i tt e e t o see what can be done.
COUNCIL MEMBER NEA L MOVED TO TABLE THE COUNCIL BIL L UN TIL
THE 2 ND MEETING IN NOVEMBER AND TO ESTABLISH A COMMITTEE TO STUDY
THE BILL. Co un cil Member F itz pa t r ic k s e c onded the motion. Upon a
call of th e r oll , t h e vo t e resulted as f o l lows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday , Neal , Fitz patrick ,
Weist, Bradshaw , Otis .
Council Member Bilo.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
Council Member Silo stated he voted the nay because he
would p r o b a b ly be out of to wn for the second meeti ng i n November .
City Attorney De Witt stated in re writing the ordinance
Council wo u ld have to act upon it t wo times , a mendment on the 15th
and final reading the first meeting in Decemb r •
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
--
October 18, 1982
Page 8
Council Member Silo changed his vote to aye.
COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO RECONSIDER THE MOTION.
Council Member Silo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll,
the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
Upon a call of the roll, the vote on the original motion
resulted as follows:
were:
Ayes :
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Silo, Bradshaw, Otis .
None.
The Mayor declared the motion ca rried.
• • • • • • *
There were no other vis i tor s at this time •
• • • * • * •
"Co mmun icatio ns -No Action Recommended" on the agenda
(a)
(b)
(c )
(d)
(e)
(f)
Minut es of the Board of Ca reer Service Co m-
missioners mee ting of August 19, 1982.
Minutes of the Urban Renewal Authority meet-
ing of September 1, 1982.
Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of September 21, 1982.
Minutes of the Liquor License Authority meet-
ing of October 6, 1982.
Minutes of th Public Library Adv isory Board
meeting of October 12, 1982 .
Memorandum from th Dir ctor of Engineering
Services to th City Manag r cone rning his
at endanc at th APWA Congress and Equip-
I • •
•
•
October 18, 1982
Page 9
(g)
•
• •
----
ment Show in Houston.
Memorandum from a Battalion Chief and Captain
in the Fire Department to the City Manager
concerning their attendance at a Hazardous
Materials Tactics Seminar in Nashville.
COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO ACCEPT "COMMUNICATIONS -NO
ACTION RECOMMENDED", AGENDA ITEMS S(A) -S(G). Council Member Bilo
seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
Mayor Otis declared a recess at 9:00 p .m.
vened at 9:10 p.m. Mayor Otis asked for roll call.
the roll, the following were present:
*
Council recon-
Upon a call of
Council Members Higday, Neal, Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw,
Ot i s.
Absent: Coun cil Me mber F i tzpatr ic k.
The Ma y o r decla r ed a quo rum pre s ent .
ORDINANCE NO . 42
S ERIE S OF 1 982
* * * *
BY AUTHORI TY
* * *
COUNCIL BILL NO. 44
INTRODUCED BY COU NCIL
MEMBER NEAL
AN ORDINAN CE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH BOARD OF COU NTY CO MM IS-
SIONER S , ARAPAHOE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO , PROVIDI NG MUTU AL
ASSI STANCE IN PROVIDING TRANSPORTATIO N TO SE NIORS AN D HA NDIC APPED
S ENIORS.
COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 4 4 ,
S ERIES OF 1982 , ON FINAL READING. Council Member Silo seconded the
mo tion. UPon a call of th roll, the vote resulted as follo ws :
Ay Council M mb r Higday , N al,
•
I • •
•
October 18, 1982
Page 10
Nays:
Absent:
•
• •
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
Council Member Fitzpatrick.
The Mayor declared the motion carried •
• • • • • • •
Council Member Fitzpatrick entered the meeting at 9:15
p.m.
ORDINANCE NO. 43
SERIES OF 1982
• • • •
BY AUTHORITY
• • •
COUNCIL BILL NO. 48
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BILO
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR LIBRARY SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AND ARAPAHOE REGIONAL LIBRARY
DISTRICT FOR 1983.
COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 48,
SERIES OF 1982, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Bradshaw sec-
onded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried •
ORDINANCE NO. 44
SERIES OF 1982
• • • •
BY AUTHORITY
• * •
COUNCIL BILL NO. 49
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BILO
AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE TAX LEVY IN MILLS UPON EACH DOLLAR OF THE
ASSESSED VALUATION OF ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO , FOR THE YEAR 1983 AND ESTABLISHING A MILL LEVY
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
October 18, 1982
Page 11
•
• •
FOR THE ENGLEWOOD COLORADO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND DE-
CLARING AN EMERGENCY.
City Attorney DeWitt noted a letter from the Englewood
Downtown Development Authority which was included in the packet.
Mr. DeWitt stated the letter supports the establishment of the mill
levy at 5 mills for the EDDA for 1983.
COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 49,
SERIES OF 1982, ON FINAL READING. Council Member Bradshaw sec-
onded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried •
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 1982
• • • •
BY AUTHORITY
A BILL FOR
• • •
COUNCIL BILL NO. 50
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER NEAL
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING CORPORATE OFFICERS, AGENTS, OR EMPLOYEES
FROM VIOLATING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD BY
ADDING SECTION 5, TO CHAPTER 3, TITLE 11 OF THE EMC '69, AS
AMENDED.
COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 50,
SERIES OF 1982, ON FIRST READING. Council Member Fitzpatrick sec-
onded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried •
• * • • • • •
BY AUTHORITY
I • •
-
•
~
•
October 18, 1982
Page 12
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES CF 1982
•
• •
A BILL FOR
COUNCIL BILL NO. 54
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER FITZPATRICK
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH REGIONA L TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT.
COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO PA SS COU NCIL BILL NO.
54, SERIES OF 1982, ON FIRST READING. Council Member Silo sec-
onded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Nea l , Fitzpatrick,
Weis t , Silo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the mot ion carried.
ORDIN AN CE NO.
SERIES OF 1982
* * * *
BY AUTHORITY
A BILL FOR
* * *
COU NCIL BILL NO. 51
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BRADSHAW
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTION (3) OF SUBSECTION (A) OF SECTIO N
2 , CHAPTER 6, TITLE XIII OF THE '69 ENGLE WOOD MUNICIPAL CODE, AS
AMENDED, BY CHANGING REFERENCE TO COLORADO STATE LAW.
COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 51,
SERIES OF 1982, ON FIRST READING. Council Member Fitzpatrick sec-
onded th motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes: Council Member s Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
Nays: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * • • *
•
I • •
•
•
•
• •
October 18, 1982
Page 13
COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO PASS A PROCLAMATION DE-
CL ARING OCTOBER 24, 1982, AT "UNITED NATIONS DAY". Council Mem-
ber Bilo seconded the motion.
Council Member Neal spoke against the proclamation based
on the United States' policy of action if Isreal is thrown out of
the United Nations.
Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Bilo, Bradshaw.
Council Members Neal, Fitzpatrick, Weist,
Otis.
The Mayor declared the motion defeated.
* * * * * * *
City Attorney DeWitt stated the Odd Fellows case would be
argued in Arapahoe District Court on October 22, 1982, at 8:30 a.m.
and invited the Council to attend.
* * * * * * *
City Attorney DeWitt stated he was working on the down-
town ordinance and would be following up with the landscaping or-
dinance in the near future.
* * * * * * *
City Attorney DeWitt stated he wou ld be out of the office
on October 20 and 21 .
* * * * * * *
Acting City Manager Vargas presented a Council Communi-
cation concerning the 1982 Concrete Replacement Program and award
of construction contract for the program. The low bidder was J & N
Concrete.
CONTRACT
CRETE IN
seconded
follows:
COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO AWARD THE CONSTRUCTION
FOR THE 1982 CONCRETE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM TO J & N CON-
THE AMOUNT OF $18,597 .21. Council Member Fitzpatrick
the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
Ayes: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis •
I • •
-
•
•
•
October 18, 1982
Page 14
Nays: None.
•
• •
The Mayor declared the motion carried •
• • • • • • •
Acting City Manager Vargas referred to a memorandum con-
cerning the 1983 budget and asked if Council was in agreement.
COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO DISCUSS THE 1983 BUDGET
IN A STUDY SESSION ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 25, 1982, AT 5:00 P.M. Coun-
cil Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the
vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
Nays: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
• • • • • • •
Mayor Otis asked for volunteers to sit in the viewing
stand for the Veteran's Day parade, November 11, 1982.
No one volunteered.
• • • • • • •
Mayor Otis reminded Council of the need to appoint re-
placements for the vacancies on the Non-Emergency Employees Re-
tirement Board and on the Election Commission. Mayor Otis stated
he recommended Bill Byer for the Retirement Board and Mr. Devol for
the Election Commission.
Council concurred •
• • • • • • •
Council instructed the City Attorney to prepare a pro-
c lamation to declare the week of November 21 -28, 1982, as Nation-
al Bible Week.
• • • • • • •
Mayor Otis stated there will be no parking signs posted
for the annual holiday parade this year and no parking will be en-
orced strictly. Mayor Otis stated Dorothy Romans was handling th
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
•
• •
-
October 18, 1982
Page 15
mechanics of the enforcement and to contact her if there were any
problems.
* * * * * * *
Mayor Otis informed Council Pat Crow, the City Manager's
secretary, was in the hospital and that a card and flowers wou ld be
sent to her.
APPOINT
NANCE.
call of
* * * * * * *
COUNCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO
COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO WORK ON THE AMUSEMENT DEVICE ORDI-
Council Member Fitzpatrick seconded the motion. Upon a
the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * * *
COU NCIL MEMBER BRADSHAW MOVED TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARIN G ON
NOVEMBER 15, 1982, AT 7:30 P.M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS COUNCIL
CAN HEAR THE MATTER ON AMENDMENTS TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. Coun-
cil Member Neal seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the
vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw, Otis.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried •
* * * * * * *
Council Member Fitzpatrick asked that answers to various
questions on the redevelopment plan be available at the study ses-
sion on October 25, 1982.
* * * * * * *
Acting City Manager Vargas stated information concerning
the s wer rate analysis would be available at the October 25th
study session •
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
October 18, 1982
Page 16
* * * *
•
• •
* *
There was no further business to discuss.
* * * * * *
COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO ADJOURN.
*
*
Mayor Otis adjourned the meeting without a vote at
9:35 a.m.
Deputy City Clerk
•
I • •
-
I...
I. )
7 :30 P.M.
1.
•
• •
AGENDA FOR THE
REGULAR MEETING OF
THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 18, 1982
'0 ti,o Call to order, invocation by Pastor Dale Schlafer,
South Evangelical Presbyterian Fellowship, 3311
South Broadway, pledge of allegiance by Boy Scout t
Troop No. 92, and roll call. J V · ,l-
Minutes.
(a) Minutes of the regular meeting of October 4,
1982. (Copies enclosed.)
2 . Pre-Scheduled Visitors. (Please limit your presenta-
L ~
l l .i_ '-
"t,1
--, l,
)
tion to 10 minutes.)
(a)
(b)
(c )
i -
(d )
Firefighters Don Schoenbein and Randy Pickrel
will be present to award prizes to the winners
of t he 1982 Fire Prevention Poster Contest.
Mr. Allan Fleming and Ms. Jody Bachelor will
be present to accept a citizens award for
saving Mrs. June Hively's life in a fire in
her Englewood home.
Ms. Debbie Van Epps, President of the Englewood
Business and and Professional Women's Club,
will be present to accept a proclamation pro-
claiming October 17 -23, 1982 s National
Business Women's Week. (Copies enclosed.)
Mr. Craig Matthies and Mr. Floyd Matthies,
3932 South Broadway, will b pr s nt to discuss
the Amus ment Devic Ordinance (Item 7a ).
Hr. Ron F. Monro , H n gr, nd Hr. St nton H.
Draz n, Own r of Bumpers in Cinderell City,
will b pres nt to discuss the Alnus m nt D vie
Ord i nanc (It m 7 ). I • •
•
• •
Page 2
Oc t o b e r 18 , 1982 Agenda
2 .
. rJ
3.
4.
5
6.
Pre-Scheduled Visitors Continued. (Please limit
your presentation to 10 minutes.)
(f ) Mr. Richard Babich, 1537 West Alameda, will be
present to discuss the Amusement Device Ordinance
(Item 7a).
(g ) Mr. Robert Briola, Bob's Grocery at 3296 South
Washington Street, will be present to discuss
the Amusement Device Ordinance (Item 7a) .
Other Visitors. (Please limit your presentation
to s minutes.)t /),,,.,,r. ~u_.i.
'-11U-~
Public Hearing.~ )!l e, J.. ~
Communications -No Action Recommended.
(a) Minutes of the Board of Career Service Com-
missioners meeting of August 19, 1982. (Copies
enclosed.)
(b) Minutes of the Urban Renewal Authority mee tin g
of September 1 , 1982. (Co pi e s enclose d .)
(c) Minutes of the Plann i ng and Zoning Co mm is s ion
me eting o f September 21, 1982, (Cop ies enc l ose d.)
(d ) Minu te s o f t he L i quo r Li c ens e Auth o r i ty meeti ng
o f Oc t o b er 6 , 198 2 . (Copie s enclosed.)
(e) Mi n utes of t he Pu bl i c Lib r ary Advisor y Board
meeting of Octob r 1 2 , 198 2 . (Cop ies enclosed .)
(f) Memorandum from the Director of Engineering
Servic e to the City Manager concerning his
att nd nee t the APWA Congress and Equipm nt
Show in Houston. (Copies nclos d .)
(g ) M mor ndum rom a Batt lion Chief and Capt in
in th Fire Dep rtm nt to th City Manger
cone rning th ir tt nd n e e at H zardous
Mat rial T ctics S minar in Nashvill. (Copies
ncloa d.)
Co munic i o n -Action R comm nd d.
•
I • •
•
• •
Page 3
October 18, 1982 Agenda
7. City Attorney.
C
J
Ordinances on Final Reading.
Ordinance amending Title IX, Chapter 2, of the
Englewood Municipal Coe of 1969, as amended, by
repealing and reenacting Sections 1 through 8,
inclusive, relating to the control of amusement
establishments, commonly known as "Amusement
Devices Ordinance," and declaring an emergency.
(Copies enclosed.)
Ordinance approving an Agreement with the Board
of County Commissioners, Arapahoe County, State
of Colorado, providing mutual assistance in
providing transportation to seniors and handi-
capped seniors. (Copies enclosed.)
Ordinance approving an Agreement for Library
Services between the City of Englewood, Colorado,
and the Arapahoe Regional Library District for
1983. (Copies enclosed.)
Ordinance fixing the tax levy in mills upon
each dollar of the assessed valuation of all
taxable property within the City of Englewood,
Colorado, for the year 1983 and establishing
a mill levy for the Englewood Colorado Downtown
Development Authority and declaring an emergency .
(Ordinance and letter from EDDA enclosed.)
Bills for Ordinances.
Bill prohibiting corporate officers, agents,
or employees from violating the Municipal Code
of the City of Englewood by adding Section 5,
to Chapter 3, Title 11 of the Englewood Municipal
Code of 1969 as amended. (Copies enclosed.)
(f) Bill pproving an agreement with Reg ional
·lct....i'ransportation District. (Bill and Council
~ l Communication enclosed.)
Bill amending Subsection (3) of Subsection (A)
of S ction 2, Chapter 6, Title XIII of th 1969
Englewood Municipal Cod , as amend d, by changing
ref renc s to Color do Sc t Law. (Copi s
n c los d.)
Procl m ion.
(h) ion procl iming Octob r 24, l 82 s
ion Day. (Copi s nclos d.)
I • •
-•
• •
Page 4
October 18, 1982 Agenda
7. City Attorney (Continued).
8.
9.
10. Adjournment.
t~) r)!:£,,~
AND MCCOWN
Ci Manager
AM /sb
en 11-;s ~ t:11-1 3c
{) C'--<. l <J o tJ' 'Y>v-->1 ? 1
•
I • •
•
• •
, ~
'-X () Oi u1rvu ./Y) ~ ') lq...
'""r-j 1 ' j ROLL CALL
. Jo r ,">,.
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Ab s ent Abstai n
Hiadav
Neal
Fitzoatrick --Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
{1_LJ--d CJ ~ /I ~
nul:~-v0 ~,__-;;_.,;,L
(? ~ / ~[ SuJ Ju-.y P-q ~
(? ~J--. ~tH-:u
2d i90
I ~ u ,,1-Cl Y1 .
I . .
• •
• -
• •
--
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Ab s ent Ab stain
Hiadav V
Neal 1,...---
Fitzoatrick t.-------Weist .....-
Bi lo v
Bradshaw -Otis V
I • •
•
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiadav I
Neal
V Fi tzoat rick
Weist
Bi lo
V Bradshaw I
Otis 1--
• I • •
• •
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved s
1_
econded
I j Hiodav
Aye.._
r
Nay Absent
f Nea 1
I I I I
Abstain
I
I 1
Fitzoatrick I ----Weist I -
'
, ~ Bi lo I -,_ I/'" I Bradshaw I
I I I Otis I I I I I I
I • •
• •
• -
• •
• e r1nf
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hi da
Neal
Fitz atrick
Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
• I . •
• •
• -
• •
.,_ ----..
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiodav
Neal
Fi tzoat rick ---·---Weist ,_,_..-Bi lo
~ Bradshaw
Otis
• I • •
•
-•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved s econded Aye Nay Absent Ab s ta in
~ Hindav I -·-Neal
'-Fitznatrick ---Wei st -Bi lo
Bradshaw
I i Otis l
/Ii ai-./iv ,,_, J -. ) ~ -Ou l '--' p u -JL -J
)A.2:f:~~ ~ (,,t'Y"----r
/?Ju ,1., d,1 ,,) i,;: '.:___ '~ <-
I (
•
Ct~
;: ·t I ,
{l ~-7 ()
,,f? { I/-I -__,
l J t '/i.()u
,,,. 1.,.,.,~,..,1.,_.
(I U ~
G / 1
( <'))
•
I • •
• -
• •
--..
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ay e Na y Ab s ent Abstain
.
Hindav
(.,' Neal
Fitzoatrick --Wei st
Bi lo -Bradshaw
Otis
l:;}-l,<_,.A.J/tf ----v--d
;57u ~
-r tCZ /u,u /1/) 1 ~t4
• I . •
• •
• -• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded A ye N ay Absent Abstain
J; Hiadav
Neal I
Fitzoatrick ·-Wei st I -Bi Jo I
Bradshaw I
Otis I
\
• I •
,
• •
-
Moved Seconded
-f.
d
q_ 2 -2
•
C(, ·7 -
•
(! -y
I
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Aye N ay Ab s en t Abst ai n
Hiadav
Neal
Fitzoatrick
Weist -·-
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Oti s
d })La.i/1.uo I.Lf-tJ[p so~
l ( 1 <) <
-/IS t> ~
f ,, ,t<
Jj V ,L
( 1 &> s c9.,.a4 ~
s-JJ'lf~j'
L .;;i 7,.., > c...,._....
C ~ ~ ll I c;. A. ,If.. ,,( ( • u -, o C; • / ))L t (! 1..J
u, ~ ',J t.. <.t.
•
I •
-
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiodav
Neal
Fitzoatrick
Weist --
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
9-~ ... I~--(_,u---;r),,lk..<{ Ju.-:t /2J ff
cc)J
( Jj _;L • ct JU: u '¥--_/.. l{ZAUH V--1. )<:1-.()/).V'..«.t
~ -0 J '8-t,A-0L£4. ~
A) u )L /-~t JI q ei~~~-3
e 'r ~; ~.
--~--/ 9 ~. -. [&... · ~ 6 (.Jl, )le(// l( ')). ' z.o u c.
('..t l tt c'
/) 4' /-/2. 2 >'-6
C tf l..A. _, LA.... C-<. l "·v--
-, L~ I-,.t ~ 'S Ju
~H L I t 'i"' 4 t'~ y ll 1/ ~
) l
1:; 'f; ( ,< \ i'J'" I , "l(. { &
1.,/ ' :J (
"' ~ < ~ 1 (!../ tfa <' -/) • .-c1' L,-<;}~--
,(, " I.
t.
tll k
r IA. t U i' ?l~ t ,
'v I <I., '" ._.,,,
_,I(.. ( (_
1 C,<t
•
I . •
-•
• •
..... _
-e:::x,---~
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded A ye Nay Absent Abstain
Hindav
Neal
Fi tzoatrick --Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
U ... U:.A. ..,vL. Li' t-<_,J r L _&.,,i.;J;__'-l !ft, <-L
h .. y-L~~ ,1-• A ,l ~ ?.U .k .,_'t <{J _.
/ I ( ')1 C \ t J l.l,i
. /I U{ "l ~ ~ 'lu. -o. i.:[: d' -<. It i-1
I.< r {I
'(J t) ..{_ (')
•
C ) l ~ -f! ) Lt k I { ( {C4 /-L
.J.., l,(l((r-1. (' {'i i{L, ? S <' I, " 7 l " I
t t, (v,
)
l ( , 1 (I 1, c t • n, 1 -,,(_), ,J
(( ~ 1-
,: ./))I~)., ./ /. ,.(J.ti , .,I -
l l /J .-, c7l t 17
•
I • •
Moved
•
•
• •
-----
RO LL CALL
Seconded Ay e Nay Ab t s en Ab s t a i n
Hiadav
Neal
Fitzoatrick -----Weist
Bi lo -Bradshaw
Otis
,f /Y1!ltilta.R · _ ·Tu ~A'">'i v ) ((_ J C,~ 'X<'d
-(
7 H >ltl.J
{t(
[/ZU yi-t,)'[£X(u,z f (
10, 1D I 21. I
? I-< "-L
('.,:' (/'·.I
., ; \
I • •
•
• •
------.a-.:=--;:-:
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiodav
Neal
Fitzoatrick --Wei st
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
r
-~~ ;; fl ?}f~&-.
-» l ~ 17/2t'2...,, _,IA. L(:{_,h uu ')L0
fa7.o 1 -n cY /)1 , /ll (!ffld.
-dL-tl /) I-/lfl ~~ < 01..:., 6 /)J />
1
, ,<l "'-<-/u V r..._, /J'
l2 (.->a
I . •
• •
•
• •
.___..____ _,,_ --=--
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiadav
Neal I -Fitzcatrick ---~-Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
\
0 r 6
I • •
• •
-
•
•
•
• •
---=--
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Absta · 1n
Hiadav
Neal
Fitzoatrick
Weist ---
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
J~ r --,<-~ F'v_ljc.__., I.A_ ( y.. ......
.,Lha ,01.P d_ a.U -<Auw ~-;:r; «,ru ti
}i-v_,:yu 6J.Jio cf(L-OA' n /-. C:U.1/il //®)
I . .
.....-. . I
-
..,,,
Moved
a
•
•
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Seconded
Hiadav
Neal
Fitzoatrick
Wei st
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
ti 1 1 h '))t.,y_,,;.r
0-1. J../?J 'l 0:... /-z 1 ·
Aye Nay Absent Abstain
J 'j" / 3?> c Ju,J.__,ru
jOO 'l 1. "rt~ tZ {J. 0
•
---
{ cu
I . •
la n
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded A ye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiadav '\
'./ Neal ) . Fi tzoat rick I --
Weist I
Bi lo I
V Bradshaw T
Otis \.
I • •
•
-
•
Moved
Z·
ROLL CALL
Seconded
Hindav
Neal
Fitzoatrick
Wei st
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
)'' £ntk..
{lft C(r:Y, 4. -a
CJ {r {i
•
• •
Aye Nay Absent Abstain
·-
.I. ..:J -
,..,,. 6 ,·1 ~L (,/ -/)')1..1!,.(1..")?. () '-'£!.~,r..~·LV
.,
I , ,; 1-<./-
~n f '<-R ?l,Q.,....,, ~ ':..I 1 ?~
,('. If 1 ./-~/-/}7 /) /, _..tj
t( ,-( ).__...
I,,,, 1-~r
., t..~'
-L11 )7.:Jc , •• t.,
--~ (/ e,,.-/
r .
lt I ) r)I J} 1!
•. r ,:, ,,. r,· , ~, . .)f.t c
•
-·
I • •
I ~-I
•
•
> lb
Moved
.u
D V' C·----
Seconded
I
(.l ,,11
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Aye Nay
Hiadav
Neal
Fitzoatrick
Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
r c lu ._, -/iuJ IL''--
/Y'' ~ ~t
~ L i -,,l ' -l /u (, ' 'r f'J < l, ,,~ G
.....f.r-t_.l ~ .,.. ~ 0 4-.. j '-'-' I' U ? Cf
J. b.._1._ ~ tx. () z. d ( t n ,, 0<.,, _-;L!,u. l
Tiu._, h--c..i!/tt-a..t. J u ,u_,
/( I-4. { l L.. /~ t ' (
Absent Abstain
I
I
1 s ~Y <J
/' , ,
0
( 4''J I uj ?, :;_ q (,,-5 Ct ;,,, Au f ,,
l /Lt i t k.-/) t U t/1
.
-
• •
--
' ( ('
I . •
t
-
•
--j
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Na y Absent Abst a in
Hiodav
Neal
Fitzoatrick
We ist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
't /l/~ , 4-:eu ~
1 r D o w / cf--Cl... ~ /.. £~ n d .
·-(;. ~ on.to '?[ 7 6-l< ..._, )
~-1-u~ ~/L U ~~J
--t LI/\ J) U v
0 --5 ( b ) -'j-? co 'rf :f di.{) di.J v.,.l,.,1;_;
. .J!'Y)
~l<ll< tc -;Sc, .( d,/!--U l cu 1,.2.,. I-/1 ;i l
(. vu,,,
(!J_;:[ <.,, r 1
tf < ... \. ..... c; ,
-U.. 'l nt L ~
,tW/1 )U't
I ,,u....-'--
1) ( 'J.-,) I ? 1 (
°\LP )YIJ I /u vV
~
L-1 (E,1.. (1 L~
"\<....(.J.;., ' I ,:) Ct 1. <°?
'-
•
I • •
-
'
•
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
/J
Hiadav
Neal
Fitzpatrick --Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
.(_lj {)...:; k.('dl ~t'Oli.dUJ ,,
q7s s
\lrt../1 YYl
n.l flu
l._l.10C
LL Q !{itQ...,,t.-,1 ?1 '; //
,; /fI{J-c1.'Y'I u ')f /-' l J-(_./)' t ')) u.£ Cu.__.,
c/ •
I) cf,1>u r /l Ye ~
ll< , ,j; j µ'/! /YYL,U J\ , e. Li 'f , lj /,..__,
fl/./-,(A. r. i .,.l/)<..., t>->'>\...U ..__...-yY'--' I-ct utt.
. d., vt/tf',.t r,-,..,.,,
99 % t ? 4 ,; 7 ~ -li111j..._/
.,,et. n 2 ( 1u;. ,1.'ll.l1 s l !J..<1-( G -fa<-·'/ ~~ (!-0 c ll
tZll.l l.:J
(/Jct.-< }l.. t"c l(. / (J~)) >}]
. 501,r.. d· ,l l ll 7j
t
lf 71. /.:_ / 2L L._ /u_ -, V «.-a <-<..1 ..,..,-
u (. I • •
• -
• •
a:s:
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiodav
Neal
Fi tzoat rick -Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis I
tn ~ //J n /l Y)
-..S-. X_ fl >u.-L< C 1)
iv/~ ~OF--)q)~ FJ o=
CJ-r!J-I~ -
,,( ) \
{. (1. /. µ 0
/7._, i _,,l ")I h(f <,;c. l. ".
. .!A. J.__.{ V Ll -{, l"-J J, tl..f. JU ,')V-.> J-~t:r J
(_ ./ '6-
•
(r ~ -Ltt 2('1 Tv.. a Z: i \...L/
(4 L-<Jz:; J'
• I . •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiadav I v Neal I
V' Fitzoatrick I ---Wei st I
Bi lo J.---
Bradshaw I
Otis I
~ ~,&(. ~ l t;___;/
/1 r {~ tr' _,a_~ 0
en.A .,(_
•
• I . •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Ab sent Abstain
Hiadav \
Neal I
Fitzoatrick I ---Weist I
---i;. Bi lo I ,,__ Bradshaw
Otis \
•
• I • •
• •
• -
• •
.,,,,,
ROLL CALL
Moved Secon de d Ay\ Na y Ab s en t Ab s tain
Hiadav I
Neal I
Fitzpatrick I
Wei s t 1
Bi lo I
Bradshaw {
Otis \
"-
• I •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiadav
Neal
Fitzoatrick ---Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
•
I • • •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiqdav \ v-Neal I
Fitzpatrick I ---Wei st I v--Bi lo I
Bradshaw I
Otis \
"'
• I •
• •
-
Moved
{
•
•
ROLL CALL
Seconded
Hiadav
Neal
Fi tzoat rick
Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
q,. 1-V 1J /7")
,k... q, ID
•
• •
Aye Nay Absent Abstain
---
I .
•
•
• •
">n:s
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Ab s ent Abstain
Hiodav ,._...
Neal L---
Fitzoatrick I V ---Wei st y-
Bi lo v-
Bradshaw -Otis r-
• I • •
•
• •
>,,
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiadav I v--Neal I
Fitzoatrick t.--------Weist
V Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
1
I • •
• -
• •
-------
ROLL CALL .
{}-
Mov e d s econded Ay_e Na y Abse n t Abstain
I I I Hiadav l \ I I I 1
1 Neal I ' I
' Fitzoat rick 1 -
--We i st I -.,,... Bi lo J -,_ J.--Brad s haw I . I Ot is I
\
• I . •
• •
• -
• •
-,.,.
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
HiQdav
Neal
Fitzpatrick --·-Wei st
v-Bi lo
~ Bradshaw
Otis
-------
!] I{
• I . •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ay_e ., Nay Absent Abstain
Hiodav \
Neal I
Fitzoatrick I ---Weist I
Bi lo I
Bradshaw I
Otis \
'-
•
• I • •
• •
~-•
• •
ROLL CALL
M d ove d d Secon e Ay~ Nay Ab s ent Ab s t a in
Hiodav I
V Neal I
v-Fitzoatrick I
Wei st T ---
Bi lo I
Bradshaw \
Otis \
'
• I • •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiadav \
Neal }
I./ Fitzoatrick 1 ---Weist I
v--Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
\..
I • •
•
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absent Abstain
Hiodav ' Neal I
V Fi tzoat rick I ----·-Weist I
Bi lo I
V Bradshaw I
Otis \
""-
• I • •
l • •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
H1qday
Neal
Fitzoatrick
Weist
V Bi lo ..... Bradshaw
Otis
"~ 0Lt1 1-(,. :)
~ 21 5 ~~ / ya V---d---f.. c-< /--/L 1A l,t "'--
( I)
A __,..-. t, t--j._ 7 ti. ru -cf l< ?) J
~ ci--c_
• I . .
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
HIQdav c_..:.
Neal V
Fl tzoatrick ,....
Weist t----"
Bi lo -Bradshaw -Otis V"'
0
I • •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded sen Ayes Nay Ab t Ab stain
HI n<l;w
Neal
Fl tznatrick
Weist
Ri lo
Bradshaw
Otis '
1
1~ C-£ k-1--/)1 ~ tA,"-L_ .
cc_, L..~ t 1"-' ~ ~
~ fl T ~ /}c~ -<.. _/
u ::; ~7
• I . •
• •
-•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay
.
H1nnav
' Neal
Fl tzoatrick
Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
6 3c /{'--
J ;:f /uj~
~~
--------.,,u.,'Vfl {. l0 Jl-j
r.
{,
~,
.ct.. /h
•
J
)(,
•
Absent Abstain
--
-
--
-"
2
I • •
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Ab stain
.
Hiqday ' Neal I
"' Fl tzoatrick 7
Weist I
Bi lo 7
v--Bradshaw I
Otis \
~
I . .
• •
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Ab t ' s a,n
Htodav
Neal
Fltzoatrick
Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
h ~r /Y) ??U)~'Yl1alz,f
r1 0-o-/c_, --<-f' U1?~.o:u' /~ .-6< z.U
)
I . •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
Hlqday '\.
Neal l
Fltzoatrick I
Wei st I
Bi lo I
V Bradshaw I
Otis \
"" C ·""'-
)>
I • •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
H1ndav
Neal
Fitzoatrick
Weist
Ri lo
Bradshaw
Otis
q C:~ · ytvf ,v}.1 /LVVLV~ ~ ~<-cfn
?,1 ! diuVl-/ ~ //-1/-F~
-;'1-C> /)
I .
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes N ay Ab sent Abstain
HiQday
Neal
Fitzoatrick
Wei st
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
;3-
~ ·Y)
Ff l;/-~ I ,
i ' ~--~ I
I • •
•
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded A yes Nay Absent Abstain
Hll'll'lay
Neal
Fltzoatrick
Weist
Ai lo
Bradshaw
Otis -
I • •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes Nay Absent Abstain
-H1qday \
Neal I
v--Fitzoatrick I
Weist I
Bi lo I
.....--Bradshaw r
Otis \
'-
C
• I • •
•
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ayes N ay Ab sent Abstain
H1qday \ .,,,--Neal I
Fl tzoatrick I
Weist I -Rj lo I
L,,--Bradshaw 1
Otis \
'\..
• I • •
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded A N yes ay Absent Abstain
Hint1av
Neal
Fi tznatrick
Weist
Bi lo
Bradshaw
Otis
1~ur ~ ~ vU 'Y\ t?)C
l~ ,V-' -~ °(!
--f~ 1 1 . tu)' 1. "'Cj; :3.s-
• I . •
• •
-
•
REGULAR MEETING:
•
• •
CO UN CIL CHAMB ERS
CI TY OF ENG LEWOO D, CO LORADO
Oc o b e r <1, 1 98 2
I~
The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapah oe
County , Colorado , met in regular session on October 4, 19 8 2 , a t
7:30 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw , presiding, c a ll e d t he me e ting to
order .
The invocation was given by Pastor Tom Bybee , Englewood
Wesleyan Church, 4609 South Fox Street. The pledge of allegiance
was led by Boy Scout Troop No. 92 .
Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw asked for roll call. Upon a c al l
of the roll, the following were present:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick , Weist,
Bilo, Bradshaw.
Absent: Mayor Otis .
Mayor Pro Tern Bradshaw declared a quorum present.
* * * * * * *
Al so pr es ent were: City Manager Mcc o wn
* *
Ass is tant City Man a ger Va rg as
City Attorn e y DeWitt
Di re c tor o f Publ ic Wo rk s Wagg o n er
Depu t y Cit y Cle rk Watk i n s
* * * * •
COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO APPRO VE THE MI NUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTE MBER 20, 1982 . Council Member Bilo sec-
onded the motion. Upon a call of he roll , the vot resulted as
follows:
Ayes:
Nays :
Absen
Council Members Higday , Neal , F itzpatrick ,
W is , Bilo , Bradshaw .
Non •
Mayor O is.
•
I • •
-
•
October
Page 2
were:
•
• •
4, 1982
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried.
* * * * * * *
There were no pre-scheduled visitors.
* * * * * * *
There were no other visitors.
* * * * * * *
"Communications -No Action Recommended" on the agenda
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of September 8, 1982.
Minute s of the Parks and Recreation Commission
meeting of September 9, 1982.
Memorandum from the Fire Chief to the City
Manager concerning his attendance at the
I.A.F.C. Annual Conference in Philadelphia.
Memorandum from the Director of Public Works
concerning the Leaf Bag Program.
Municipal Court Activi y Report for the month
of August, 1982.
COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO ACCEPT "COMMUNICA-
TIONS -NO ACTION RECOMMENDED" AGENDA ITEMS S(A) -5(E). Council
Member Bilo seconded the motion. Upon a call of he roll, he vote
resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Abs n
Council Members Higday, Ne 1, Fi zpatrick ,
Wis , Bilo, Bradshaw.
None.
Mayor O is .
Th Mayor Pro Tm d clar d th mo lon carri d.
• * * * * * *
•
I • •
-
•
Octo b e r 4 , 198 2
Pag e 3
•
• •
City Manager Mccown pre s ented a Counc i l Communic a tion f rom
the Planning and Zoning Commission c oncerning the Stat e Highway De -
partmen t Work Program for Fiscal Year 1983 -1984.
Director of Public Works, Kells Waggoner, came forward and
discussed in detail the project requests for the program. He ex-
plained the requests are submitted to Arapahoe County Commissioners
to be included in the State Highway Department Work Program.
COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO SUBMIT THE REQUEST FOR
CON S TRUCTION OF AN INTERCHANGE AT WEST DARTMOUTH AVENUE AND SO UTH
S ANTA FE DRIVE. Council Member Bi lo seconded the motion. Up o n a
c al l o f t he ro l l, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw.
None.
Mayor Ot i s.
The Mayor Pro Tern d e clared the mo t ion c arried.
COUNCIL MEMBER FIT ZPATRICK MOVED TO SUBMIT THE REQUE S T TO
UPGRADE THE EXI STING INTERCHANGE AT THE INTERSECTION OF S OUTH S ANTA
FE DRIVE AND U. S . 285. Coun ci l Member Bi lo seconded the mot i on.
Upon a call o f h e ro l l, the vote resulted a s follows:
Aye s :
Nays :
Absent:
Counc il Memb e rs Higd a y, Nea l , Fitzpatr ic k,
We is , Bi lo , Br a d s h a w.
Non e.
Mayo r Otis .
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried .
COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO WITHDRA W THE REQUEST TO CON-
STRUCT AN INTERCHANGE AT THE INTERSECTION OF SOUTH SA NTA FE DRIVE
AND WEST OXFORD AVENUE ; AND TO DISCUSS AT A LATER TI ME IF QUINC Y
AVENUE IS IN THE REGIONAL TR ANSPORTATIO N PLA N. Council Me mber Hig-
day seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote re-
sul d as follo ws:
Ayes:
Nays:
Abs nt:
Council Members Higday , Neal , Fitzpatrick ,
Weist , Bilo, Bradsha w.
None .
Mayor Oti s .
•
I • •
•
October 4 , 1982
Pag e 4
,·
•
• -
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried.
COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO SUBMIT THE RE QUEST TO CO N-
STRUC T A ONE-WAY PARALLEL COUPLET AT THE INTERSECTION OF U. S . 285
AND WE S T ITHACA AVENUE BETWEEN SOUTH BROADWAY AND SOUTH SANTA FE
DRIVE. Coun ci l Member Fitzpatrick seconded the motion . Upon a call
of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatri c k,
Weist, Bila, Bradshaw.
None.
Mayor Otis .
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried.
COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO SUBMIT THE REQUEST TO
EXTEND THE STO RM DRAINAGE ALONG U. S. 285 BETWEEN SOUTH DOWNIN G
S TREET AND SOU TH PEARL S TREET. Council Member Bila seconded the
motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Higday , Neal, Fitzpatr ick ,
We ist , Bila, Bradshaw.
None .
Mayor Otis.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion ca rr ied .
The nex request was a pro ject that would w idened South
Broadway from Yale Avenue to F loyd Avenue and from Quincy Av enue to
Bellevi w Avenue providing left-turn pockets and landscaped medi-
ans.
COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO SUB MIT THE REQUEST TO WID ENED
SOUTH BROADWAY FROM YALE AVENUE TO FLOYD AVENUE; AND REMOVE THE
MEDIAN AT FLOYD AND SOUTH BROADWAY; AND WIDENED SO UTH BROADWAY FROM
QUINCY AVENUE TO BELLEVIEW PROVIDING LEFT-TURN POCKETS AND LAND-
SCAPED MEDIANS . Council Member Higd ay seconded the motion .
Discussion e nsued regarding th proj ct 's impac on th
downtown rd v lo pm en plans and traff ic flow on So uth Broadway.
COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL CHANGED THE MOTION TO READ TO WIDENED
SOUTH BROADWAY FROM EAST MAN TO YALE AVENUE INSTEAD OF FLOYD AVENU E
TO YALE AVENUE AND WIDENED SOUTH BROADWAY FROM QUINCY AVENUE TO
BELLEVIEW PROVIDING LEFT -TURN POCKETS AND LANDSCAPED MEDIAN S •
•
,
I • •
n
•
•
October 4, 1982
Page 5
•
• -
Council Member Higday withdrew his second.
Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw declared the motion dead.
COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO SUBMIT THE REQUEST TO
WIDENED SOUTH BROADWAY FROM YALE AVENUE TO FLOYD AVENUE AND FR OM
QUINCY AVENUE TO BELLEVIEW AVENUE PROVIDING LEFT-TURN POCKET S AN D
LANDSCAPED MEDIANS. Council Member Silo seconded the motion. Upon
a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Higday, Fitzpatrick,
Weist, Silo, Bradshaw.
Council Member Neal.
Mayor Otis.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried.
COUNCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO WITHDRAW THE REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT SOUTH CLARKSON TO TWO LANES FROM U. S. 285 TO EAST OR-
CHARD AVENUE. Council Member Silo seconded the motion. Upon a
call of the roll, the vote resul ted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Higday, Neal,
Weist, Silo.
Council Members Fitzpatrick, Bradshaw.
Mayor Otis .
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 41
SERIES OF 1982
* * * *
BY AUTHORITY
* * *
COUNCIL BILL NO . 45
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER HIGDAY
AN ORDINA NCE APPROVING AN INTERCONNECT CO NTRA CT WITH THE CITY AND
COU NTY OF DENVER, BY AND THROUGH ITS BOARD OF WATER CO MMI SSIONERS.
COU NCIL MEMBER HIGDAY MOVED TO PASS COU NCIL BILL NO. 45,
SERIES OF 1982 , ON FINAL READING. Council Memb r Bilo second d h
mo ion. Upon a call of th roll, h vot resul d as follo ws:
•
I • •
-
•
•
October 4, 1982
Page 6
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
•
• -
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatri ck ,
Weist, Bilo, Bradshaw.
None.
Mayor Otis.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared the motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 1982
* * * *
BY AUTHORITY
A BILL FOR
* * *
COUNCIL BILL NO. 41
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER FITZPATRICK
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE IX, CHAPTER 2, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICI-
PAL CODE OF '69, AS AMENDED, BY REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 1
THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS 9 THROUGH 19, INCLU-
SIVE, RELATING TO THE CONTROL OF AMUSEMENT ESTABLISHMENTS, COMMONLY
KNOWN AS "AMUSEMENT DEVICES ORDINANCE", AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO PA SS COUNCIL BILL NO.
4 1 , SERIES OF 1982, ON FIRST READING. Council Member Bilo sec-
onded the motion.
Mayor Pro Tem Bradshaw instructed th City Attorney to
exp re ss appreciation to Assista nt City At torney David Menzi es for
his work on this council bill.
Council Member Neal requested o discuss this bill furth r
at a study session .
Upon a call of th roll, the vot resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Abs n
Council Members Higday, N al, Fitzpatrick,
Wist, Bilo, Bradshaw .
Non •
Mayor O is.
Th Mayor Pro Tem d cl rd h motion carri d.
* * * * * • *
I • •
October 4, 1982
Page 7
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 1982
•
• -
BY AUTHORITY
A BILL FOR
COUNCIL BILL NO. 44
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER NEAL
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS-
SI ONERS, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORADO, PROVIDING MUTUAL
ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING TRANSPORTATION TO SENIORS AND HANDI CAP P ED
SE NIORS.
COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BIL L NO. 44,
SE RIES OF 1982, ON FIRST READING. Council Member Fitzpatrick sec-
onded the mot io n. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
follows:
Aye s :
Nays:
Abs ent :
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatrick,
Wei st , Bilo , Bradshaw.
Non e .
Mayor Otis .
The Ma yor Pro Tern declared the motion ca rr ied •
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 1982
• • • •
BY AUTHORITY
A BILL FOR
• • *
COUNCIL BILL NO. 48
I NTR ODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BILO
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR LIBRARY SERVICES BET WEEN
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AND ARAPAHOE REGIONAL LIBRARY
DISTRICT FOR 1983.
COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PASS COUNCIL BILL NO. 48,
SERIES OF 1982, ON FIRST READING. Council Memb r Higday s cond d
h mo ion . Upon a call of he roll, th vo result d as fol-
lows:
Ay s:
N y
Council M mb rs Higday, N al, Fitzpa rick,
Weis , Bilo, Br dshaw.
Non .
•
I • •
-
•
October 4 , 1982
Page 8
Absent: Mayor Otis.
•
• •
The Mayor Pro Tern declar ed the mo ion carried.
ORDINANCE NO.
SE RIES OF 1982
* * * *
BY AUTHORITY
A BILL FOR
* * *
COUNCIL BILL NO . 4
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BILO
AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE TAX LEVY IN MILLS UPON EACH DOLLAR OF THE
ASSESSED VALUATION OF ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, FOR THE YEAR 1983 AND ESTABLISHING A MILL LEVY
FOR THE ENGLEWOOD COLORADO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AN D DE -
CLARING AN EMERGENCY.
COUNCIL MEMBER BILO MOVED TO PAS S COUNCIL BILL NO. 49,
SERIES OF 1982, ON FIRST READING. Council Member Nea l seconded he
motion. Upon a call of the roll, the voe resul ed as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Abs e nt:
Co un cil Members Higday, Ne al , Fitzpa rick ,
Weist, Bilo, Brad sha w.
None.
Mayor Otis.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carried .
Council Member Bilo instructed staff o send a copy of
Council Bill No. 49 to the Englewood Do wntown D velopment Auth o r it y
for comment.
* * • • * * *
COUNCIL MEMBER FITZPATRICK MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROCLAMA -
TION DECLARING THE WEEK OF SEPTE MBER 26TH THROUGH OCTOBER 2ND,
1982 , AS ·DRUG FREE YOUTH WEEK·. Council M mb er Bilo s conded h
mo ion. Upon a call of th roll, th vote resulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Council M mbers Higd ay , Neal , Fitzpatrick,
W is , Bilo, Bradshaw.
Non •
I • •
-
•
Octobe r 4 , 1 98 2
Pa ge 9
Absent: Mayor Otis.
•
• •
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion c ar ried .
* * * * * * *
City Attorney DeWitt stated he would be g1v1ng Coun cil a
report on the Jay claim after he had talked to the attorn e y on th e
other side.
* * * * * * *
City Attorney DeWitt asked for permission to appe a l t h e
decision of Municipal Court in the matter of the Gothic Thea t r e and
the City licensing ordinance.
COUNCIL MEMBER NEAL INSTRUCTED THE CITY ATTORNEY TO APP EAL
THAT DECISION OF MUNICIPAL COURT RELATING TO LICENSE REQUIREMENT S
WITH ALL DUE HASTE. Council Member Fitzpatrick seconded the
motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follow s:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Higday, Neal, Fitzpatr ick ,
Weist, Silo, Bradshaw.
None.
Mayor Otis.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion c arried.
* * * * * * *
Ci ty At o rney DeWitt r e porte d the St a t e of Colo ra do has
mad e a pre lim i n a r y decision not to i mp ose t he e xp n dit ur e of $13
million fo r st r ea m classifica ion . Mr. D Wi ts at~ a p ermanen
decision would be for hcoming •
• * * • • * *
CO UN CIL MEMBER FITZ PATRICK MOVED TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARIN G
ON T HE CO MM UNI TY DEVELOP MENT BLOCK GRA NT FUNDS (CDBG) ON MONDAY,
OC T OBER 25 , 1 9 82 , AT 7 :30 P.M. Council M mber Silo seconded h
mo ion . Up o n a call of th r oll , th vo r sul ed as follo ws:
Ay s :
Nays:
Council M mbers H1gday , N al , Fi zpa ri c k ,
W is , S ilo , Br ad h~w.
Non .
Mayor Oti s •
I • •
-
•
Octo ber 4, 1 9 82
P a g e 10
•
• •
The Mayor Pr o Tern de c lared th e mot i on c ar ried .
* * * * * * *
Ci t y Atto r ney DeWitt an n ounced he would be absent fr o m
his offi ce on Fr iday , Octobe r 15 , 1 9 82 , speaking a t a con f er e n ce .
* * * * * * •
Council Member Neal requested an e xe cuti v e s e ssion fo l l o w-
ing the reg ular meeting to discuss property acqu i s itio n .
* * * * * • •
Council Membe r Fitzpatrick drew attent io n to an a r ticle in
the NLC ne wsletter conce r ning cable TV .
• * * • • • *
Council Me mber Bilo as k e d that discussion of the d o wn o wn
plan (flood plain ) be added to the e x ec u ti v e sessio n.
* * • • • * *
No fur t h e r business was dis~usse d .
• • • • * • •
CO UN CIL MEMB ER HIGD AY MOVED TO ADJ OUR THE EETJ G .
Ma y o r P r o Tern Bradsha w ad j ou r n d h me i ng w i hou a
voe at 8 :40 p .m .
I • •
-
•
•
• •
P R O C L A M A T I O N
WHEREAS, the Englewood Business and Professional
Women's Club strives to elevate the standards for women in
business and in their professions, as well as to promote the
interests of business and professional women; and
WHEREAS, the Club strives to bring about a spirit
of cooperation among business and professional women of the
United States, and extends opportunities to business and
professional women through education along the lines of
industrial, scientific and vocational activities; and
WHEREAS, working women of the United States comprise
41 percent of the employed population of this country, and
contribute substantially to a sound working structure of our
nation; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Council to honor
America's working women who are devoting their time, talents,
and energy to assist other women achieve the recognition
and respect they deserve in the business world;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, EUGENE L, OTIS, Mayor of the
City of Englewood, Colorado, urge all citizens to join in
the observation by giving their support to the Club, its
members, and the working woqien of this comaunity, not only
during this week but through the weeks that follow.
GIVEN under my hand and seal this 18th day of Octob r,
1982.
•
I • •
•
• •
·~ .. n
\'
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the Englewood Business and Professional
Women's Club strives to elevate the standards for women in
business and in their professions, as well as to promote the
interests of business and professional women; and
WHEREAS, the Club strives to bring about a spirit
of cooperation among business and professional women of the
United States, and extends opportunities to business and
professional women through education along the lines of
industrial, scientific and vocational activities; and
WHEREAS, working women of the United States comprise
41 percent of the employed population of this country, and
contribute substantially to a sound working structure of our
nation; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Council to honor
America's working women who are devoting their time, talents,
and energy to assist other women achieve the recognition
and reapect they deserve in the business world;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, EUGENE L. OTIS, Mayor of the
City of Englewood, Colorado, urge all citizens to join in
the ob•ervation by giving their support to the Club, its
member•, and th working women of this co1m1.unity, not only
during this week but through the weeks that follow.
1982 .
GIVEN under my hand and seal this 18th day of Octob r,
Mayor
•
I • •
•
•
NAME
/ E VAN l... ip s r~1N
/ \ Ko'<'QIC ,~
\.\_l~-~ ~"' ~ ~ ""'
/ /' :/dE /lf~6[,./
•
• •
•
Before The
CITY COUNCIL
on
~!&',, ;qtcJ
ADDRESS TELEPHONE OBSERVER
+It A v ~
7 04.J I.). 14 =i. 3.;1.... -<;' r <.: I '-;1:.lc.e.v ,11.,1
4 C{\ ~c...,A L ee,~(\\ ~ ~ \ 5tn1/"'
Jtro s 14,1..fiaJ;.u.f</#}30 =
!51 0[17£
re
I WISH TO ADDRESS THE CI TY COUNCIL
IN FAVOR IN OPPOSITION NO POSITION
X
V
(
v
•
-
•
• •
OOARD OF CAREER SERVICE <ll!MISSIOOERS
August 19, 1982
MINUIES
aA
PRESENI': Jo Ellen Turner, Catherine Pokraka , Janet Kerzic, Betty Keena,
funald Weber
ABSENI':
CJlllERS
PRESEN.l':
None.
Benjamin Craig, Olreer Service Board Attorney
Pete Vargas, ~istant City Manager
Willis Carr, Enployees Association President
Randy Pickrel, Firefighters Association President
Richard Welbourne, Police Benefit Association President
Michael Gruninger, Fire D.O.E.
Chainnan Weber called the rooeting to order. Q:mn:i.ssioner Keena noved, seconded
by Ccmnissioner Kerzic to approve the July 15, 1982 regular meeting minutes .
AYES : Turner , Pokraka, Kerzic, Keena, Weber
NAYS: Nooe
• • • • • • • •
Item three on the Agenda was the Associations Oloice . Will Carr , Er.ployees
A.ssociatioo President was present. Randy Pickrel, Firefighters Association
President cannented that recently the erit Appeals process had not been
initiated properly and recarmencled that Department Heads as well as mployees
be inforrood of the Career Service System and the Merit Appeals System so that
the proper procedures can be followed in the future. Richard Welbourne, Police
Benefit Association President asked the Board to advise him of woo would be
considered the :lnmediate supervisor in the first step of processing a class
action grievance. Pete Vargas , istant City Manager suggested that it would
be roore appropriate to request such an opinion fran the iation 's legal
couns 1. A!ter a brief di on of the 1111.tter, the Board ded that
the Association ask th Police Chief for hi opinion of should be the
signature at the first 1 v 1 of the grievance until the procedure cnn
clarified in future contract n tiations.
• • • • • • • •
Oloice . Pet Vargas, istant
finalizing the first draft
t them to City O>wlc 1
f in ~ich they d n
rec:aunendati on t Amin ra ti
• • • • • • • •
•
I • •
•
•
•
• •
Page 2
Item five on the Agenda was O::mnissioners Clloice. Cllainnan Weber opened the
meeting for discussion and recxmnendatioos for the developrent of a Merit
Appeals Fonn. '!be Ccmni.ssioners and audience DEl!i)ers revi~ several sarrple
foms. Ccmni.ssioner Pokraka. asked Pete Vargas , Assistant City Manager to clarify
if the Board has any written guidelines as to what are the Aaninistrative Procedures
and if the old ,m-itten ordinances are still in effect.
'!be Firefighters Associatioo requested the Merit Appeal Fonn include the date that
the Ehployee Relatioos Department is contacted of the Merit Appeal,and the date
of the act or condition, or date when the enployee knew or should have known of when the
condition occured upon which the Merit Appeal is being filed. The Firefighters
Association also requested that the reason for the approval, denial or referral
at each step of the procedure be included on the fonn. Pete Vargas stated that be
would prefer to subnit the City's recamendations in writing to the Board after
further review. Olainnan Weber stated that the Board ...ould prepare a Merit Appeal
Fonn draft and foxward copies to the City and the Associations for their review
and recrnmendations. Michael Gruninger stated that be was aware of a pending
Merit Appeal and asked what fonn should be used in the interim . Ccmni.ssiooer
Pokraka stated that the tenporary fonn prepared by the Board could be used in such
a case while the final draft was being develq>ed. Further discussioo of the time
restrictions of the Merit Appeals procedure ensued . A date of Wednesday , August
25, 1982 was set for the Board to receive final reccmnendatioos after all interested
parties have had an opportllllity to review the Board's draft of the Merit Appeals
Fonn.
• • • • • • • •
There being no unscheduled visitors or further business before the Board,
ChairnBn Weber adjourned the August 19 , 1982 regular meeting of the Career Service
Board at 8 :45 p.m .
I • •
.......
•
I. CALL TO ORDER.
•
• -
URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY
September 1, 1982
5 ~i
The Regular Meeting of the Englewood Urban Renewal Authority wa s called t o
order at 5 :45 P.M. by Vice-chairman R. P. McClung.
Members present: McClung, Minnick, Dickinson, Fitzpatrick
Power s , Executive Director
Members absent: Powell, Vo th, Cole
Alternate Member Novicky
Also present: Economic Dev e lopment Planner Hinson
City Attorney DeWi tt
II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
Mr. McClung stated that the Minutes of August 4, 1982, were t o be con sidered
for approval.
Minnick moved:
Fitzpatrick seconded : 'nle Minutes of August 4, 1982 , be approved as written .
AYES: Minnick, Dickinson, Fitzpatrick, McClung
AYS: None
ABSENT: Powell, Vo th, Col
The motion carried.
III. URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY BUDGET
1982 Revi s d Budget
1983 Propes d Budg t
th
r not
occur. R vi ion
reflect current stimated
b Voth nt rd tin at 5:50 P.M.
oth r reviai
r cordina C
in th 1982 budg t, such a adv rtisi ng,
•
d
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
he did n o t feel that matter uc h a l and a c quisition s hould be the re s pon si-
bil ity of Mr. Be n e d e tt i , howe ve r. Fu r ther disc ussion on the e s timate f or
l egal s e rvi ces en s ued . Mr . DeWitt stat d that he fel t the $10,000 f i gure is
very cons ervat i v e. Mr. DeWit t s t a t ed tha t on ti t le e xaminations by t i t le
companies, the Auth o r i t y cou l d plan on a t leas t $2 00 for e ach piece o f land .
Discussion ens ued. Ms. Powers s tat e d that the Ci t y Co unci l wi l l be hav i n g
a budget retreat in the near future, and that Mr. Vargas , As si s tant Cit y
Manager, would be handling the matters of the Urban Renewal Authority at
this retreat. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that he would also bring up the matter
of legal fees for the Authority for discussion with the Council. Mr. Fitz-
patrick suggested that the proposed budget for 1983 be rounded off to $50,000
rather than the proposed $45,196.50, and that the difference be applied to
Account #3121, Legal Services. Mr . Fitzpatrick stated that he felt the
Authorit y shoul d have some idea of the expenses that are be i ng accrued by
March of 1983, and that the budget could be reviewed at that time and any
request for s upplemental appropriations could be made to the City Coun c i l .
Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that he felt it should be noted in communcations t o
the City Council on the pro posed budget that the $50,000 budget is a con-
servative figure. Mr. Fitzpatric k stated that he would also like to see it
noted that the Urban Renewal Autho ri t y would review the expenses of the
Authority i n March, and would make some notification to City Council a s t o
whether a supplemental appropr i ation would be required.
Mr. DeWitt reiterated that if the Authority or staff ha s questions of a legal
nature they s hould be directed to Mr. Benedetti; Mr. DeWitt stated that he
wanted to encourage a free flow o f dialogue between the Authority , s taff,
and the special counsel. Further disc ussion ensued.
Mr , Fitzpatric k s tated that he would like to see q ue s tions posed t o the
s pcia l couns e l limited to matt r s pertaining t o the agreements with develope r s ,
n e go tiat ions, e t c .; he s tated that he felt there a re a lot o f questions that
a r ise that c an be handle d i n-ho u s e b y the City Attorney 's s taff. He s t a t e d
tha t he is o ppo ed to having any thing that c an be ha nd l ed i n-house go ing t o
Mr. Be ne d et t i , other than the Plan i t sel f, a nd the a greem n ts. Mr. McClun g
stated t hat for all i nte nt s a nd pur poses , matte r s pe rta i ning t o the Ur ban
Renewa l Plan a nd Authori t y would be cleared through Mr . Be ne de tt i ; a ll other
matters would go to the City Attorney 's office .
Minnick mov d:
Dickinson and Fitzpatrick econd d: The Urban Rn w l Authority approv th
1982 Revis d Budg t, and recommend it to
th Engl wood City Council with a r qu st fo r suppl nt 1 funding.
AYES: Voth, Dickinson , Fitzpatrick, McClung, Minnick
NAYS: Non
ABSE NT: Col , Pow 11
Th motion carri d.
Fitzpatrick mov d:
Minnick cond d:
11
hou
Bud t, •• revi
Council.
AYE : Vo h, Dickin on,
that th
Urb n
of Paul
1 Authority nd agr
City b h nd l din-
co nd d th t th 1983
d r r rr d to th City
rick, HcClun , Minnie
•
i I • •
-
•
•
• •
-3-
NAYS : None
ABSENT: Powell, Cole
The motion carried.
IV. BY-LAW AMENDMENT.
Ms. Powers discussed the proposed amendment to the By-Laws, which would
incorporate §31-24-104(d) of the Colorado Revised Statutes into the present
by-laws as a new Article III, Section 7. This section of the Colorado Re-
vised Statutes pertains to conflict of interest. Discussion ensued.
Minnick moved:
Voth seconded: The By-laws be amended by adding a new Article III, Section
7, to read as follows:
No commissioner, other officer, or employee of an authority
nor any immediate member of the family of such commissioner,
officer, or employee shall acquire any interest, direct or
indirect, in any project or in any property included or
planned to be included in any project, nor shall he have
any interest, direct or indirect, in any contract or pro-
posed contract for materials or services to be furnished
or used in connection with any project. If any commissioner,
other officer, or employee of an authority owns or controls
an interest, direct or indirect, in any property included
or planned to be included in any project, he shall innnediately
disclose the same in writing to the authority, and such dis-
closure shall be entered upon the minutes of the authority.
Upon such di closure, such commissioner, officer, or other
employee shall not participate in any action by the authority
affecting the carrying out of the project planning or the
undertaking of the project unless the authority determines
that, in the light of such personal interest, the participation
of such member in any such act would not be contrary to the
public inter st. Acquisition or retention of any such in-
terest without uch determination by the authority that it is
not contrary to the public interest or willful failure to dis-
clos any uch inter st constitute misconduct in office.
AYES: Fitzpatrick, McClung, Minnick, Voth
NAYS: Dickin on
ABSENT: Col , Pow 11
Th motion carri d.
V. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS.
Pow rs s tat d th t this
po al• Crom d v lop rs. Th
inter st to contractors nd
th Wall Str t Journal.
d v lop ra. A list
d •
is th initial draft of n invitation for pro-
would b advertised in publication• of n ral
d v lop rs in this ar a, plu s uch publications
This ia inane fort to solicJ.t int r st fro
o publication was ravi w d, ••was• list or
uld b dtr ct con act; th lit of d v lo rs
Writ r Corpor tin, Oel bb Corporation,
•
I • •
•
• •
-4-
Mr. Dickinson asked who would make the decision on selection of the develop er?
Ms. Powers stated that the Urban Renewal Authority would solicit the proposals
from the developers; these would be screened by the staff, and a joint meeting
with the City Council and Urban Renewal Authority would be held and the decision
would be made jointly .
Mr. Fitzpatrick suggested that KRAVCO might also be con tacted as a developer.
Mr. DeWitt stated that the parent company is Equitable, but suggested that
the invitation for proposal be sent to both KRAVCO and Equitable. Mr. Minnick
suggested that Petry-Volpe is also a large developer who might be interested
in the redevelopment project. He also suggested Vantex Properties, Inc.,
at 14001 East Iliff Avenue, Suite 700, in Aurora.
Ms. Powers stated that the proposals for development would be due 30 days
after publication, and that Mr. Benedetti felt the 30 days was a reasonable
time period.
Mr. DeWitt stated that he had to leave to attend another meeting at 7:00
P.M., and asked if he could briefly discuss the Tri-party Agreement. He
stated that he had met with Mr. Loring Harkness, counsel for the EDDA. He
will go over the Tri-party Agreement with the EDDA, and minor changes would
be made. Mr. DeWitt stated that it appeared from this discussion with Mr.
Harkness that thi s Agreement would be forthcoming within the next two week s
or so.
Ms. Powers stated that she had talked to Mr. Benedetti regarding the Tri-
party Agreement earlier on this date; he is redrafting this agreement, and
it will be in more detail. Mr. Benedetti stated that he felt this Agreement
could be available by Monday.
Mr. DeWitt excused himself from the meeting.
Ms. Powers further discussed the requ st for proposals which would be sent
to th d v lopers and the advertisement which would be placed in the paperq.
Ms. Pow rs stated that she had discussed this with Mr. Bened tti, and that
he has mad several uggestions for modifications . Mr. Benedetti feels,
for instanc , that "d veloper" should b "redevelop r" throughout the pro-
po al, nd it should b made cl ar in Part I, §B, that the gross squar footag
i Other modifications sugg ted by Ir. B nedetti w r
di Part II w • augg sted to b modified by Mr. B n d tti,
d: "In th v nt th tr d v lop nt of th s
e improv compl t d th iey URBAN RE-
EWAL AUTH RITY will dip of th l nd to 1 ct d dev lop rat fair
ACC ROANCE WITH TIIE DOWNT WN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ."
pare 1
which
lit din
y b
rt l v".
d
I • •
•
• •
-s-
a Public Hearing and amend the Downtown Redevelopment Plan to include that
property; the City Council would, by resolution including that propert y in
the Plan, be giving their permission for condemnation to the Urban Renewal
Authority.
Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that he would see nothing wrong with including th e
s tatement "and/or City Council". Further discussion ensued. Mr. McClung
spoke in favor of leaving the statement as it is presently written. Ms.
Powers discussed Mr, Benedetti's concern that the City of Englewood doe s
not have the protection against litigation in matters of urban renewal t hat
the Urban Renewal Authority does . Mr. McClung stated that he felt the
Authority should accept Mr. Benedetti's recommendation, and leave th e s tate -
ment as it is written. Mr. Minnick stated that he would agree.
Mr. Dickinson spoke further in favor of amending this particular s tatement.
He stated that he felt it would "strengthen" the position of the Authority,
in that we would be "up front that the land won't be condemned without the
City Council approval". Mr. Dickinson stated that he felt we s hould "s tate
it as it is rather than being deceptive."
Ms. Powers stated that if any of the property that is to be condemn e d is to
be resold for redevelopment, the Urban Renewal Authority has to be involved .
Discussion followed.
Mr. Fitzpatrick moved:
Dickinson seconded: The second sentence on Page 2 , First Paragraph, be
amended to read: "The use of eminent doma in by the
Urban Renewal Authority AND/OR CITY COUNCIL will be considered only as a
last res ort for property acquisition."
AYES: Dickin o n, Fitzpatrick
AYS: McClung, Minni c k, Vo th
ABSENT : Powell, Cole
The motion failed.
Ms . Powers further discu ssed Part II on Page 1 , noting that furth r clarification
and expan sion is needed t o indicate that on any city-owned property that i to
be dispo d of, City Coun cil would h v to make any decision with th involv -
nt of th Urban Renewal Authority. Mr. Dickinson qu stion d th n d for
thi stat nt at all. Di cu ion followed. Mr. Fitzpatrick at ted th th
felt it 1hould be noted that th City prop rty will not be di pos d of ut
pproval of th City Council following con ultation with th Urb n Rn wal
Authority. Furth r di cus ion nsu d. M. Pow r t t d that Hr. B n d tti
ha advi d that d v loper should hav knowl dg of what
i v ilabl or rd v lop nt.
S ction III wa 1 th n con1id r
background in ormation for th
S ction IV wa con aid rd.
inforaiatton that th atb
in dditi n to wh ha b
a t d tha p rhap1 a map
prov d •1 ht b in lud d, with a
th Ci y' l d control pro r••·
. Pow rs not d that thi 11 pri .. rily
r1.
•
w r
to pro p ctiv
Hr. Fitzp trick
Cr k tha i to b
i•prov nt w uld c<>11plet
I • •
•
• •
-6-
Mr. McClung asked if the fee charged for the developers packet would be r e-
fundable? Ms. Powers stated that it would not. Discussion followed. Mr.
McClung stated that he felt perhaps a $15 or $25 fee would be a reasonable
charge .
Discussion on the Redevelopment Proposal followed. Mr. McClung asked if
a time limitation should be indicated. Ms. Powers stated that she would
suggest 30 days from the date of advertisement. Mr. Hinson noted that DURA
gives 60 days from the date of the first advertisement.
Consideration of the Request for Proposals continued. The evaluation of
Statement of Qualifications and Development Proposals was discussed. Mr.
McClung stated that if we want the developer to submit proposals to us, th ey
should be given a full picture of what we want. Mr. Fitzpatrick stated that
he felt if they indicate an initial interest and response, then the full
packet could be sent to them.
Page 6 of the Request for Proposals was considered. A paragraph was deleted,
and subsequent paragraphs redesignated.
Ms. Powers stated that revisions would be made to this document, and it
would be resubmitted to the Urban Renewal Authority before placed for ad-
vertisement and sent to developers. This would be done by sending it out
to members and calling each member for conunents rather than waiting for
another meeting.
VI. PROPERTY ACQUISITION PROCEDURE.
Discussion on this document was led by Mr. Hinson, who stated that this is
a general outline of steps that would be followed in the acquisition of
property. He emphasized that any property to be acquired by the Urban Re-
newal Authority through the procedure of eminent domain would have to be
listed in the Downtown R development Plan; any property that must be acquired
but is not listed would have to be approved by the City Council following a
Public Hearing to amend the Plan and include that specific property. Prop-
erty owners would be notified in person and in writing by certified mai l;
the legal notification period would begin with the return of the return
receipt of the certification to the office.
Mr. Fitzpatrick discus ed the proc dur th Pot Office us with certifi d
nd r gi t red mail. He not d th t "Special D livery" i useies and ad-
vi d ag inst it.
S rvic
v r wa
en u d.
of notice to prop rty own r was discu
ugg t d, a wa p rson 1 s rvic with
d. Us of proces r-
witn s. Furth r discussion
n informal coD1D1itt compos d of Dir ctor of Engin ring
Engin r Kahm, City Attorn y D Witt, Assist nt City
Hanag r Varg s, Susan Pow r , and h had t to di cu s appr i rs. Contacts
with DURA, th Bould r Urban Rn wal Authority, Littl ton nd
a of top apprai r a thy h d ua d. Anoth r tin i sch dul d
2nd, and a r co111111end ion on n appr ia r would b mad to th
Authority.
Th individual ton aot!at th ctu l cqui ition of th property w s di -
•
I • •
•
•
• -
-7-
cussed. Mr. Hinson stated that this individual would have to be sensitive
to the needs of both the Ur ban Renewal Authoritymd of the property owner.
Ms. Powers stated that negotiations for property acquisition would not occur
until after the signing of the Developer's Agreement. She stated that she
would recommend the individual engaged to negotiate the acquisition of land
also negotiate the relocation benefits for those property owners.
Mr. McClung stated that the Urban Renewal Authority really could not do
anything until the bonds are sold; he posed the hypothetical question of
someone coming to the Authority and stating that they want to sell their
property, but the Authority did not have the funds available at that time;
what could be done? Mr. Voth suggested that the City could purchase the
land, and later sell it to the Authority when the Authority did have the
funds. It was noted that this is what happened on the property on South
Bannock that has been acquired by the City.
Mr. Hinson noted that there probably will have to be two appraisals if a
second is requested by the property owner. Discussion ensued. Mr. McClung
questioned the need for two appraisals, particularly if they are to be pai d
for by the Authority? Ms. Powers stated that if the property owner asks
fo r a second appraisal, s h e understood that the Authority would have to pay
for it. Discussion ensued.
Mr. Dickinson excused himself from the me eting at 7:55 P.M.
Mr. Hinson stated that Mr. Benedetti want s to review the qualifications of
the appraiser that is selected.
Hr. Fitzpatrick discussed his contacts with Ms. Thelma Paige, and Mr . and
Mrs. Breidenstine . Hr . Voth stated that he felt it should be the policy
of the Authority that Hr. Fi tzpatrick, exclusively, handle the discussions
and contacts with Ms. Paige. Mr. Fitzpatrick s tate d that he would keep the
Urban Renewal Authority members informed on what progress he makes on these
contacts.
Ms. Powers stated that the staff is g tting information together to try to
get funding to move the st ructure owned by the City, and to rehab it; it
could then be used for people to move into while their structure is being
relocated. Discussion ensued.
Ms. Pow rs tat d that the staff has composed a lit of ppraisers th t
could be con id rd. Hr. B n detti ha indicted that h would do some
background ch eking on thes individuals befor a formal election i mad
Sh tat d that wh n mor information i avail ble, it will b brought to
the Authority. rs stated that th apprais rs would b interview d.
Hr. Fitzpatrick suggest d that one or mor members of the Urban Renewal
Authority it in on th interview of th appraisers.
Ms. Pow ra at ted that w would requ st propo als from th apprai era, which
proposals would includ such thing as n estimat of coat, as w 11 as a
background st cement.
Fitzpatrick mov d:
Minnick a cond d: Th t two mb rs of the Urban Rn wal Authority b d sin t d
to sit in on th int rvi w, and that a vot b t kn b
telephon as to who thoa mb ra may be. It ia au geat d
that one of th member s o d signated to sit on th int rvi w
board be th Chairman •
•
I • •
•
• -
-8-
Mr. Fitzpatrick stat ed that he would ask to no t be considered to sit o n the
interview board .
Mr. Voth and Mr . McClung s tated they would be available t o sit on the inter-
view team . Mr. Minn ick stated t ha t he would not have the time to do so.
The vote was ca lled :
AYES: Fitz patrick , McClung, Voth , Minnie
NAYS : None
ABSENT : Powe ll , Cole, Dickin on
The mo t i on carried.
VII. MONTHLY REPORT.
Mr. Hin son s t ated that thi i a new r port that has been written by the
staff , and it is planned that it be mad available to the Au thority on a
monthly basis.
VIII. TRI-PARTY AGREEMENT.
Ms. Powers stated that there have been a se ries of these agreement s prepared,
one p r epar ed by the City, one prepared by the EDDA Counsel, and Mr. Benedett i
is working on a draft which would incorporate facets of both the oth r draft s .
Ms. Powe r s further discussed the Tri-Party Agreement, and s tated that Mr.
Benedet t i had indicated he hoped to have this final draft of the proposal
available by Monday .
IX. NEW BUSINESS.
Mr. Minnick asked how HB 1240 could b used to our hen fit . Discussion n-
ued.
Hr. Fi tzpatrick asked whether the Septemb r 15 th deadline would b mt on
th formation of the Tax Increment District befo r e th reassessment tak s
place? Ms. Powe r s stated that she and Mr . Hinson had met with the County
A e or and County Treasur r r pre entatives, and thy hav been notifi d
th t the Plan was formally dopt d by th City Council on August 23rd. Sh
d that h and Mr. B 11 will al ob going to th County to furth r di -
cuss th formation of th Tax lncre nt Di trict.
S 1 s Tax r venu for th
th r venu s r approx!
di d. Mr. Fitzpatrick noted th t
proj ct d.
Mr. Fitzpatrick not d th th h d
n w j 11 facility for Arp ho
po ing th imposition of 1/2 /
fund th con truction of this n w j
th b llot in Nov mb r, and if it pa a , it would b in
fiv y ar .
Hr. Minnick k d wh t proc dur th
d i nat Mr. Hinson th A tin Ex
Authority would hav
utlv Dir ctor durin
•
to oll
M , p
to
r l av
)
I • •
-
•
•
•
•
• •
-9-
of absence? Ms. Powers stated that she would check this out and report
back to the Authority.
Mr. McClung expressed his appreciation and that of the Authority to Ms.
Powers and Mr. Hinson for all their work and a "job well done" on the Down-
town Redevelopment Plan and the approval of that Plan by the City Council.
The meeting was declared adjourned at 8:45 P.M .
•
I • •
•
• -
CITY OF ENGLEWOO D PLANN ING AND ZON IN G COMMI SSION
SEP TEMB ER 21 , 1982
I. CALL TO ORDER .
5 C
The r egu l ar meet i n g o f the Ci t y Plann i n g and Zo n i n g Comm ission wa s called
t o orde r a t 7 :00 P. M. by Chairman McBra ye r .
Me mber s p r esent: Carson, Se nt i , McBra ye r, St oel, Ba rbre , Becker
Power s , Ex-offic io
Membe r s absen t: Gilchris t, Tang um a , Allen
Also present: Assistan t Di r ec tor D. A. Ro ma ns
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES .
Chairman McBrayer stated that t he Minutes of September 8, 1982, were to be
con id red for approval.
Carson moved:
B rbre seconded: The Minutes of September 8, 1982, be approved as written .
AYES:
AYS:
ABSE T:
Carson, McBrayer, Senti , Stoel , Barbre, Becker
on
Gilchrist, Tanguma, Allen
Th motion carried.
Ill. STATE HIGHWAY WORK PROGRAM
1983/84
CASE 1121-82 ------
Mr. McBrayer asked if th Commission m mbers had any questions on the staff
report p rtaining to the proposed projects to be requested? Mr. McBrayer
stat d tha he understood the Coll1111ission was to prioritize these items, and
recomm nd th m to th City Council.
n
1
n
Dlr
by
r qu . t id nttfl proj •cts
Highw y Sy tem for which funding
id r tlon by th Commission, a r commendation 1 mad
City Council lo turn forward th ll t of pro-
of En 1 wood w nt to hav lnclud d lo th Stat Htgh-
pahoe County Co laslon r for lnclu 1 n in the
Highway Commia Lon.
d out th t th
--thy hav
Mr . Ro11111n
Work K 11
Mr. c8 av r a aln a k d if any qu tlon ? Mr. cBr v r
roadway in Littl ton to b c nt d th th found th
I •
•
•
• •
-2-
most attractive, and expressed the hope that a similar s t yle could be carried out along Broadway .
Mr. Tanguma entered the meeting at 7:06 P. M.
Mr. McBrayer asked for clarification of the term "s heeting" action in r e-
lation to drainage ? Mrs. Roman s stated that the runoff waters flow acros s
the street, creating a hazardous driving c ondition. The storm runoff would
be controlled if the project were approved.
Mrs. Becker expressed the hope that whatever construction work is done on
South Santa Fe Drive and the proposed interchanges does not result in an
i nterchange such as at West Evans Avenue and South Santa Fe Drive . Sh
s tated that she would hope the con struction would be more attractive.
Mr. McBrayer questioned whether there wa s to be a grade separation at Quincy
Avenue and Dartmouth Avenue with South Santa Fe Drive and the railway trac ks?
Mrs. Romans stated that when the propos ed interchange is constructed, there
wou ld be separation. Mr. McBrayer stated that he thought the relocation of
the railroad tracks has begun in Denver at approximately the 2000 block
s outh. Discussion ensued .
Mrs. Becker asked about the note that is included in the s taff report re-
garding the "designation" of West Quincy Avenue between I-25 and West Kiplin g
Avenue; she asked if thi s meant de si gnation as a main artery? Mrs. Romans
sta ted that Quincy Avenue had been designated on the regional tran sport ation
plan as an arterial from I-25 west to Kiplin g at one time, and that th is
street does have the possibility of being extended, wherea s Oxford Avenu
could not be extended. Because of Che rry Hills Village 's posi ti on, it has
been removed from the plan; but there is always th e possibility f t ma b
reins tated in the future . If i t were , Quinc y would b the prop r location
for th interchange.
Mr. Stoel asked if South Clarkson Stre t is on th State Highwa y system south
to Or c hard Avenue? Mr s . Roman s s tated that I t is requested t o b placed on
th e Fe deral Aid Urban System. Brief d iscussion ns ued.
Carson mov d :
Stoel seconded:
AYES: cRray r,
AYS: . on
ABSTAI Tanguma
AB f. GI lch r l
Th tion ca rrl
The Plann ing Commission pprov
cit d ln Case #21-82, nd th t
th City Council for tnclu ion
Work Progr m.
th propos d proj ct
they be recommend d to
ln th St te Highw v 1981-84
s nti, Stoel, Barbr ' 8 ck r, Carson
t. All n
d.
IV. PROMOT_ EN.Qh.EW __J) _C~N.
•
h
ton Ind v loptna
1111ltt , or which
th COIID! t
n nit! w d •
I • •
•
• •
-3-
Mr . Hav iland stated that Ms. Emelene Russell, a free-lance artis t i n ad-
vertislng, ha s been working with him to develop a possible layout fo r a
brochure. Mr. Haviland dls tr ibut ed copies of a marketing proposal, a bro-
c hure outline , a nd a job estimate prepared by Ms . Russell to the Co mmi ssion .
Mr. Haviland s tated that there has been no comm i tm e nt made with Ms. Ru ssell
that the brochure, wi ll, in fa c t, be used , o r that if i t is used , that s he
would be awarded the contract t o actually do the brochure. Mr . Ha viland
then discussed the points that have been s ugge s ted be covered in th e bro-
chure, and noted that there would be seven major headings t o be addre ssed.
Mr . Haviland s tated that the mo ck-up brochure which ha s been p r epar ed by Ms .
Russell was done as a "tool" for the C01mn ission to see, a n d to give a cost
estimate t o work with . Mr . Hav iland stated that i t is up to the Commission
to determine the level of qual i t y they de sire in such a b r ochure , a nd what
kind of genera l product they want t o have as the end result, and the estimated
cost the y want to expend for the product. Mr. Hav iland asked that Ms . Ru ssell
present the mock-up of the brochure s he ha s p repared .
Ms . Russell gave a brief synopsis of he r background in advertising a nd stated
that she is now free-lancing. Ms. Russell discussed her concept of the pur-
pos of the brochure , ways to communicate i dea s , and how to put this down on
paper. Ms . Russell displayed the brochure mock-up, which would make use of
photograph s ; s he noted that no actual copy has been written for this brochure,
but that lines have been indicated to depi.ct what the finished produ ct would
look like . The brochure she has pr oposed would be an "eight-page" document,
wh ich count i ncludes the front and back covers. Ms. Russ 11 emphasized that
the pictures to be used in this brochure would b photography, and not drawings;
there would be a variety, and no two page would look alik . M,;. Russell
discussed the cost estimate that s h had prepar d, noting that a similar cost
estimate would b prepared by anyone wanting co follow through on such a
project.
Mr. McBrayer suggested that th Co 1 sion and City Council might want to
consider way s to recoup som of th xp n e lncurr d in th preparation
of the brochure by offering it for s 1 tor al tor , or in<Jtance. He noted
that in his buslness , h would b willing to purcha a quantitv of them
ta reasonable price for handouts to prosp ct!v nt,;. He acknowledged
that in some cases, the brochur should b iv n h also flt th r
was a strong possibility that it could be mark t om of th ex-
pens .
M<1. Roman stated that the po ibility of ollc!tin " ub crib rs" or "con-
tributors" has be n consld rd; thi ub crib r or contributor would then
h v am an of adv rti ing by payln toward th public tlon of th brochur
Discussion ensu rl.
of paper stock nsu d. It w 1 o that th brochur could
"pock t" for ins rt in th back, if d; chi concept would
te a diff r nt 1 yout from that which par d by M .
however. Mr. McBr yr not d that if th brochur w to be pr -
"g neric" lin , up-d ted information could be pared and inserted
ck pock t; this could mak th ov rall brochur ful for n x-
riod of tim • Furth r di cu ,;ion on th "pock t" brochur cone pt
Mr. H vil nd xpr d th
c d much further without
funding m y b avail bl •
opinion that th Co
n xpr a ion of int n
•
ltt cannot r
on th format
Uy pro-
nd wh t
I • •
•
•
• •
-4-
Mr. Tanguma stated that he would s ugge s t the Co mmis sion d iscuss this i d ea
i n more detail at a special session . He s tated that the not ion of a small
pocket-sized brochure had been discussed. He e xpres sed the opin ion that
all these option s need to be explor ed , and a consensus r eached so t ha t he
can report back t o the Co mm i ttee a nd a recommendation can be made t o the
City Council. Disc ussion e ns ued.
It was determined that a special me e t i ng of the Commission had been scheduled
with the Cherry Hill s Village Planning Commis s ion for Septemb e r 28th, and
that they would not be i n attendance unt il after 8:00 P. M. It wa s s uggested
that perhaps the Commission could d iscuss the broc hure concept until the
arrival of the Cherry Hills Co mm issioners for the joint meeting.
Mr . McBra ye r s tated that he felt a lis t of things the Commission is going
to have to consider is the size of the brochure, t y pe of paper, the numb er
of pages it should c ontain, and whether or not to use the "p ocket" concept .
Ms. Ru ss ell asked that the Comm ission also cons i der what genera l concept
they wanted to promote: a "slick" brochure, or a "down home" type document.
Ms. Russell asked that if it is determined to use the brochure concept such
as she has displayed, that she be given an opportun i t y to fu rther present
her capabilities and talents i n the field of advertisin g and be considered
as a cand ida t e to do the brochure. Mr. McBrayer sugges t ed that possibl y
Ms. Russell would have to conv i nc th City Council that she was the
logical choice to do the brochure.
V. COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORO I ANGE
Proposed Am ndments.
Mr. McBray r k d lf th Co ission memb r s had reviewed th propo d
amendments pres nt d bv th staff.
prohibition on retail in the R-4, Re sld•ntial/Pro-
ould prohibit th dispensing of glass from opttc
nee. Mr . . Romans stated that glasses may b d ls-
in conjunction with a "profes siona l u "; an actual
not p rmitt d.
further cla rification
•
I • •
•
•
• •
-5-
Mr . McBrayer also questioned the s tatement in the R-1-A general statement:
"To these ends , development is limited to ..... plus cert ain public facilities,
" He asked whether the r ecent amendment to the Co mpr ehen sive Zo n ing
Ordinance pertaining to excl u sion of public facilities from the requirement s
of the Zoning Ordinance was included here ? Ms. Romans defined public facilities
as noted later in this proposed revision as being such things as s treet s, alleys,
sidewalks, water and sewer lines, fire hydrants, etc.
Mr. McBrayer asked why a minimum floor area is not indicated for other per-
mitted use s, but only for a single-family residence? Mrs. Romans discus sed
the d ifficulty of determining a min i mum floor area for a church, school or
public facility, noting that a school must mee t state certification standards,
and that restrictions cannot be placed on churches.
Further discussion ensued on the matter of Us able Ope n Space and Landscaping.
Mrs. Romans s tated that the 30% Usable Open Space was derived by figuring
the area in the required minimum setbacks. This figured out to be 30% of
the total lot. Mr. Stoel suggested that if the minimum setback requirement s
are set forth, he did not feel a separate section was needed for Usable Open
Space. Ms. Becker noted that detached garages and sheds could be put in
this area, which would c ut down on the Usable Open Space; these accessorv
uses have their own minimum setback requirements.
Definitions of both Usable Open Space and Landscaping wer cited bv r~.
Romans.
Mr. Tanguma expressed his belief that there are too man y r estriction ; that
there is a need to make housing more affordable, but the requ 1rem nt ~f JO %
open space would 1 imit the d velopment that can be done on a lot. R n
pointed out that und r the pr sent ordinanc , only 25% of th lot
built upon. Under th proposed revision, 70% of th lot could b d
with buildings or structures . This would b 70% dev lop d
po ed amendment v s. a max i mum 25% lot area that cou ld be
existing ordinance.
Mr. McBray r asked for cl rification of (2) und r "Other Prov l ion nd
Requirem nt s". Mr s. Romans s tated that th is would nabl a prop rty own r
with less than the required minimum 75 foot frontage, but whos lot 1 ln
excess of 60 feet in width, to build on that lot without having to appal
to th Board of Adjustment and Appals. This provision i carried on
throughout th R-1 district , p rmitting con truction on lots In th R-1-C
District, for Jnstanc , which hav a front of 37 feet rath r th nth~
r quir d minimum 50 foot front g.
Mrs. B ck r sked why barb rs,
ar sp
ar
typ
th l
nol e
Mr. Rom n
m nt would
t th pr
t.rlct. Mr.
occup tlon
•
I • •
•
• -
-6-
Mr . Stoel questioned that utilities should b required to be underground
in a new development. Mrs. Roman s stated that this has been suggested to
be required in new "subdivisions", and not for one small development. Mr.
McBrayer suggested that i n a Planned Development , the utilities could be
required to be underground.
Mr. Ta nguma questioned the restriction on storage sheds . Mrs. Ro man s
stated that the staff recommend s a maximum size on storage sheds. She
noted that with a storage shed, and a large garage , it is very easy to
get into a comme r cial activit y. It is proposed that there be a restriction
on the size of private garages, also. The individual would still have th e
option of appealing to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals if they wanted
to exceed the restrictions suggested. Mrs. Romans stated that it has been
the experience of the s taff that large garages (four or five car garages)
lead to ne ighborhood problems. Mr. Tanguma stated with the economy the way
it is, he felt large ga rages were needed t o allow people to work o n their
own cars. Mr. Tanguma again voiced his opposition to "restrictions". Mrs.
Becker expressed her opinion that there should be a limit on the size of
garages . Mr. Tanguma stated that he felt the appeal procedure to the Board
of Adjus tm ent was costly and time consuming, and that a property owner should
not have to go through this.
Mrs. Romans pointed out that this draft of the ordinance is based on the
experiences of the staff and building inspectors, and by going through the
record of the Board of Adjustment and Appeals.
Ms. Becker stated that she is concerned about noise in a residential neigh-
borhood . She noted that large garages can lead to work on vehicles and if
this is done by "considerate" neighbors it may not be a nuisance to the
neighborhood. She cited a case where in a resid nt is splitting wood ln his
yard and selling from his yard; this is very disruptive to the neighborhood.
Mr. McBrayer suggested that the matter of further review of the Ordinanc
mendments be placed on the agenda for October 5th .
Ms. Powers asked that the Commission go through the proposed Downtown O v lop-
m nt District. She pointed out that this is a new zone district that ls being
proposed , and will replace the B-1 Zo ne District in the downtown redevelop-
ment area. Ms. Pow rs stated that this area wlll encompass provisions for a
"flexible use area", a "pe riphery area", a "commons area", and a "mall area".
Ms. Powers stated that thi s District is designed to promote pedestrian-oriented
use s and pedestrian traffi c , and to di scourag high vehicular traffic. Ms.
Power pointed out that no adult entertainment use s would b permitted in this
district. Ms. Pow rs pointed out f atur s of the proposed zone district, s uch
as height restrict ions, setbacks, building bulk, etc. The maximum height of
tructures would vary according to th rea of th district in which thy
r to be loc t d; height s long the mall ar would b restricted to three
tories; th maximum height permitted ln th Flexible Use Ar a would b
fourteen (14) s torie s .
u
•
t
t d v lop r b r -
ting or financi.n
th propoH d
I • •
•
•
• •
-7-
Ms. Powers then discussed the section on Usable Open Space. She noted
that there is none required in the Mall or Periphery areas; in the Flexible
Use Area, 30% of the site must be Usable Open Space.
Regulations for especially permitted mall activities were discussed, and
procedures for development were also discussed. Ms. Powers pointed out
that design review procedures have been written into the development pro-
cedures . Ms. Powers s tated that it is very important to make certain that
any development occurring in this downtown development district is in com-
pliance with the Downtown Development Plan, a nd the Downtown Redevelopment
Plan (Urban Renewal Plan), and that there be some controls over this develop-
ment. It is proposed that a Design Review Committee be established which
would work with a develop e r from the beginning. An appeal process is built
in, and appeals would be to the Planning Commission, who would have final
determination.
Mr. Tanguma asked if the City representative on the design review committee
was to be a City Council member? Ms. Powers stated that it would not be;
it is s uggested further in that section that the representatives be staff
members.
Ms. Powers stated that this proposed zone district will be reviewed by the
Downtown Development Authority, and while the approval of that body is not
required, they will be involved in the redevelopment process and their in-
put should be received. Ms. Powers stated that the idea of setting up a
work session with the EDDA, EBA, and Planning Commission has been discussed,
and asked the opinion of the Commission on this possibility. Mr . McBrayer
asked what the timing of this proposal is? Ms. Powe r s stated that if
possible, she would like to have the Commission schedule a Public Hearing
on the matter late in October or early November. Discussion ensued. It
was determined that a public meeting would be scheduled for October 12th,
to which meeting members of the EDDA, EBA, Chamber of Commerce, and och r
interested citizens would be invited. The possibility of scheduling a public
hearing for October 26th was then consider d. It wa s noted that both the
Chairman and Vice-Chairman would be unavailable for a meeting that evening,
and that another date would have to be determined.
Further discussion ensued. Ms. Pow r s noted that a section p rtaining to
utilities would have to be inserted into the body of this Ordinance.
M. Becker ask d if there wa s a reason that hardwar sto re s were not ln-
clud d asap rmitted use, or was this only an oversight? Ms. Powers st ted
th t the wording on th 1 ad-in paragraph ne d to be r vised, nd that hard-
w r stor s should b includ d as a permitted use; h st ted that this us
would b ppropriate in th periph ry area, but would not be appropriate in
th Mall area, for inst nee.
Mr. Roman reminded th
th propos d ordin nc
Commission that there would b other ctions of
am ndm nts forthcoming for th ir consid ration, 1 o.
VI. LANDSCAPING ORDINANCE
Mr. Sto 1 di cua d th progr
c ping ordin nc th t w pr
what th Co 1DD1i sion w nt and wh t
r und th City, h h s co to th
CASE #8-82
in r viewing th land-
nd in det rminlng jut
tat d that in driving
ion that th min probl m wlth
•
I •
•
• •
-8-
lack of landscaping is in the commercial and in dustrial areas. H point d
out that the Commission ha s previousl y determi ned that landscaping r quir -
ment s would no t be i mpo sed in the single-family districts, and landscaping
requirements are presently written i nto the R-2 and R-3 Zone Districts.
Mr. Stoel s tated that it is his proposal that the proposed ordinance be con-
cern ed only with the indus trial and commercial zone districts. Mr. Stoel
s tated that the proposed o rd inance drafted by the s taff required 20% of the
total site be landscaped i n the busine ss and i ndust r ial di s trict s , and that
one tree for e v ery 40 foot frontage wa s r equired. Fifty (50%) percent of
the landscaping mu st be of living materials . He sta ted he would like to
see these provision s r emain in th e R-2, R-3 and R-4 Zo n e Districts.
In the bu siness d istricts , he f el t that perhaps 20% is too high, and that
perhaps we should consider a requ i r eme nt of 10% of the area to be landscaped .
He stated that the cost of the land, and the parking requirement s have to
be con sidere d, and he f eels that the 20 % mi n i mum requirement is e x cessive.
Mr. Stoel stated that he feels the provision r e quiring screening be tw een
business or industrial uses and adjacent and/or abutting r esident ial zone s is proper.
Mr. Stoel di scussed landscaping of parking lots. The proposed o rd inan ce
wou l d require that for parking lots with 50 or more v e hicles , that a minimum
area of 10% must be landscaped , a nd that 25% of that mu st be i n living
material s . He s tated that he felt thi s is a good provision . Mr. Stoel
d iscussed the e nfo r cement and maintenance of land scaping. He asked if th
Commi ssion memb e r s felt that th is wa s the d irection they wanted to go in
proceeding wi th this project? Mr . Senti s t a t ed that he felt Mr. Stoel had
done a good job , and was satisfied with th e direction th e proposal was
taking. Mr . McBrayer stated that he also felt this was the right cours t o pursue.
Mr. St oel tated that he had review d the sampl ordinances provid d by
the staff , and felt that th Englewood Ord inance should be very simple,
and not as complicated as the Lakewood Ordinanc , for example. Mr. Sto 1
cautioned that the Co111111ission must keep ln mind that there are areas al ng
South Broadway, for inst nee, that cannot provid landscaping .
Mrs. Becker stated that in Downtown D nve r, there are areas wh r hanging
baskets ar placed during the summer months in an ffort to provid green ry,
and sh felt that th ,a could b don in Engl wood. Sh sugg sted that
perhaps fund paid into th L ndscap nd Fin Art Fund which wa propo d
to be creat d could b d to fln nee such thing. s th h nglng b .kets.
r. McBr yr , tac d that h would like to e om thing put togeth r, and
ugg sted th t p rhaps thi could also be a point of discussion at th
public me ting on Octob r 12th.
Mr. Sto
b mad
mph iz d th t prov! ion
r tro ctlv Furth r di
In th
•
ordin nc could not
r. T ngu xpr d
I • •
•
•
• •
-9 -
the opin i on that i n s ome i n s tances , th e 10% r e qu i r e me nt migh t be t oo high.
Mr. Stoe l s t a ted that he would agree i t could be excessiv e i n s om e cases.
He s ugges t e d tha t th e re mu s t be some fle x i b i l i t y i n c orpo rated i nt o the pro-
v isions, and leave i t to a j udgment ca ll o f the s ta f f. Mr. Ta n guma stated
that he would que s t i on l eavi ng th is t o a j udgment ca ll of t he s t aff; that he
fel t the provision s s hou l d be "s pe ci f ic ".
Ms. Becker a s k ed a bo ut land scap i ng in th e parking lo t s for less than 50
v e h i cles ; s he s tated that landscaping was needed in tho s e lo t s just as much
a s the larger lots. She also felt that there is s ome wa y t o pro v ide greenery
a nd/or lands c aping in the downtown area .
Mr. Stoel indicated that he would try to get s ometh i ng put in wr iting fo r
further consideration on the landscaping ordinance.
VII. COMMISSION GOALS AND OBJECTIVES.
Th e Commis s ion revi ewed the i r progress on the goals and ob ject i v es that had
been set out earlier in the year. It was felt that the Commi s sion is makin g
good progress , i n that man y proj ect s have been started and are un de r con-
s iderat i on at the pres ent t i me .
VIII . PUBLIC FO RUM.
No on e wa s pr e s e nt to a ddress the Comm ission und e r Pub lic Forum .
IX . DIRE CTOR'S CHOI CE .
Mrs . Roman s not e d that the f i r s t me e t i n g of th Co mm ission sche duled for
Nove mber is o n elec t i on d ay ; the Comm ission can c hoos t o mee t on that date ,
or could mo ve th e mee t i n g day t o Novembe r 3r d, a W dnesday , or mee the
followi ng w ek on No v e mber 9 th. It was the conq nsus of th Commission to
me t on Nove mbe r 9th.
Mrs . Ro man s r e mi nd e d m mb e r s of t he join t me ting with th Cherry Hills
Village Plann i n g Comm ission on September 28th. The Cherry Hills Commission
indicated that if they we r e to be i nvited to Englewood for th meting, it
would be about 8:15 P. M. before they would be hr . Discussion item pro-
posed for that m ting r th proj ct d dev lopm nt of th Bu 11 prop rty
in Cherry Hills Villa , and th Engl wood Rd v lopm nt Proj ct and th
Wt rford d v lop nt.
The annual City P rad w di cu~
of th Pared Co itt , that th
6th t 10:00 A. M., and th
x. COMMISSION'S CHOICE.
not d by Mrs. Rom n ., Chalrm n
pr sch duled for Sturdy, Nov mb r
is "Transport tion, Th n and ow."
Th r w noth1.n brought forth f'or diacu sion und r Connh. ion' 11 Cho le .
Th m ting djourn d t 9:30 P.M.
•
I • •
n
-
•
•
• •
-10-
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION
OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSI ON ,
DATE:
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATION:
Carson moved :
Stoel seconded:
September 28, 1982
1983/84 State Highway Work Program Request s
The Planning Commission approve the proposed projects
cited in Case #21-82, and that the y be recommended to
the City Council for inclusion in the State Highway 1983/84 Work Program.
AYES: McBrayer, Senti, Stoel, Barbre, Becker, Carson NAYS; None
ABSTAIN; Tanguma
ABSENT: Gilchrist , Allen
The motion carried.
By Ord er of the City Planning and Zoning Commission.
I • •
I n
-
•
•
• •
' LIQUOR LICENSE AUTHORITY
MINUTES
October 6, 1982
Ch a1rperson Donald Sty es called the meeting to order at 7:40 p .m. in the Ci t y
Council Ch ambers .
MEMBERS PRESE NT :
MEMBERS ABSENT:
AL SO PRES ENT :
Donald Styes, Ronald Blanch ard, Lloyd Brya n
Frances Cosby, Ronald Lunder s
Ch arles Grilllll, Assistant City Attorney
Eric Johannisson, Revenue Chief
Brenda Castle, Recording Se cretary
* * *
5
The Authority received an app li cation for change of ownership from Colorado
Twenty-one, Inc. dba Puddin Boots, fonnerly The Ground Round, 5180 South Broadwa y , Engl ewood, Colorado.
Present were attorney Dan W. Carr and Scott Diamond, a corporate officer to speak
for the applicant.
Because the letters of reconmendation for the corporate officers did not match those
listed on Individ ual History Records, and other discrepancies, the Author ity
requ ested that Mr. Carr and Mr . Diamond return October 13, 1982 with the appli cat 1on
in order.
* * *
Deena Eyton, 3355 S. Akron St., Denver, CO 80231, requested a public hearin g or
Swedish Medical Center. This would involve a Special Events Permit for
Octo ber 29, 1982 for Beer, Wine and Liquor.
MR . BRYAN MOVED, AND MR . BLANCHARD SECONDED, TO SET A PUBL IC HEARI NG DATE FOR
SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOR OCTOBER 27, 1982 AT 7 :30 P.M. TO CONSIDER A SPECIAL
EVENTS PERMIT APPLICATION FOR OCTOBER 29, 1982 .
AYES :
NAYS:
The motion carried.
Donald Styes, Ronald Blanchard, Lloyd Bryan
None
* * •
The m1 nutes of the meeting of September 22, 1982 were approved.
* * •
Th meeting was adjourned at 8:00 p .m .
•
I • •
-
•
MEMBERS PRES ENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
ALSO PRES ENT:
•
• •
LI QUOR LICENSE AUTHORIT Y
PUBLIC HEARING
Saint Louis Catholic Church
October 6, 1982
Dona l d Styes , Ronald Blanchard, Lloyd Brya n
Frances Cosby, Ron ald Lunders
Charles Grilllll, Assistant City Attorney
Eric Johannisson, Revenue Chief
Brenda Castle, Recording Secretary
MR. BRYAN MOVED, AND MR . BLANCHARD SECONDED, TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING TO CO NSIDER A
REQUEST FOR A SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT FOR ST. LOUIS CATHOLIC CHURCH FOR BE ER, WINE
AND LIQU OR TO BE SERVED ON NOVEMBER 7, 1982 FROM 11:00 A.M. TO 11:00 P.M .
AYES :
NAYS:
The motion carried.
9onald Styes, Ronald Blanchard, Lloyd Bryan
None
Mr. Johannisson told the Authority that the application and other necess ary
documents have been received by the City and that the not i ce was correct ly posted .
Jennife r Villano, 3110 S. Marion Street, Englewood, CO spoke to the Auth or ity for
St. Louis Church.
MR. BRYAN MOVED, AND MR. BLANCHARD SECONDED, TO APPROVE THE SPECIAL EVENTS PERMI T
FOR ST . LOUIS CATHOLIC CHURCH FOR NOVEMBER 7, 1982.
AYES:
NAYS:
The moti on carri ed.
Donald Styes, Ronald Blanchard, Lloyd Bryan
None
MR. BRYAN MOVED, AND MR . BLANCHARD SECO NDED, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AYES:
NAYS :
The motion ca r ri ed.
Donald Styes, Ron ald Blanchard, Lloyd Bryan
None
• • •
~c6Zartft.
Recording Secretary
• •
I . •
In
-
r
•
• •
LIQ UOR LICENSE AUTHORI TY
PUBLIC HEARI NG
Robert S. Br iol a dba Bob 's Gro cery
Oct ob e r 7, 1982
MEMBERS PRESENT.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Donald Styes, Ronald Blan chard, Lloyd Bryan
Frances Cosby, Ronald Lunders
AL SO PRESENT: Charles Grirrm, Assistant City At torney
Eric Johannisson, Revenue Chief
Brenda Castle, Recording Secreta ry
RON BLANCH ARD MO ED , AND LLO YD BRYAN SE CONDED, TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING TO SHO
CAUSE WHY ROBERTS. BRIOLA, OBA BOB'S GROCERY, 3296 SOUTH WASHING TON STREET ,
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, SHOULD NOT HAVE HIS 3.2 BEER LICENSE SUSPENDED OR REVOK ED.
AVES:
NAYS :
Donald Styes, Ronald Blancahrd, Lloyd Bryan
None
The motion carried.
Charles Grirrm in troduced the following exhibits for the City:
•
A. A letter from Gary Higbee, Director of Finance, dated August 6, 1982 inform ing
Mr . Briola of the hearing .
B. Certificate from the State of Colorado Liquor License Div ision dated August 8,
1982 certifying that the attached are true copies of the renewal appl ications
for the years 1982, 1982, 1983.
C. Exe mpl ified copy of a record of trial and surrrnons and complaint by the Arapaho
Cou nty Court sho win g that Mr. Briola plead no contest to th eft of und r $5 0.00.
D. Exempli fied copy of a record of the Arapahoe County Court where Mr. Briola
plead guilty to a charge of driving while ability was impaired in 1977.
E. Exemplified copy from the District Court of Arapahoe County showing that Mr .
Briola plead guilty to a theft in a class four felony, for which there was
a deferred j udgement and to a cl ass three misdemeanor for which he was
sentenced.
F. Certificate from the Depa rtment of Motor Vechicles showin g a drivers license
of Mr. Briola .
G. Copy of an official document from the En~lewood Police Department filed in
and with the District Attorney's office which initiated the action ta ing
place i n E.
H. Copy of the Engle wood Police Department file showing filing of the case
wi h District Court for the offense of purchasing from an uniden ified
s 11 r (18-16-103), purchase r to maintain register (18-16-105) and
theft by r c iving (18-4-410).
The charg s ga,nst Hr. Briola stated to be that he was not of good moral
charact rand that he lied under oath in making miss atement s on his Li qu or
License applica 1ons or 1981, 1982 and 1983.
•
I . •
-•
• •
Liquor License Authority
Publ ic Hearing -Briola
October 6, 1982
page 2 -
•
Mr. Gerald Gerash, attorney for Mr. Briola, objected to City Exhib1ts E, G and H
Hi s obj ections were over -ruled by the Chair after polling the Authority membe rs.
Mr. Grirrm called the following witnesses for the City:
Michael Sw an, Englewood Police Department, 36 15 S. Elati, Englewood, CO.
David C. Miller, Colorado Bureau of Investigation, assigned by the En~lewo od
Police Department , 3615 S. Elati Street, Englewood, CO .
Thom as Bock, Engle wood Police Department, 3615 S. Elati St., Englewood, CO .
Mr. Gerash called the follow ing witnesses fo r the Defense :
Dr . L. Dean Baxter, 137 Sherman St . Denver, Colorado, Psychiatr ist
Martin Lathrop, 3259 S. Clarkson Street, Englewood, Colorado
Kevin Ganda, 9146 W. Dartmouth Place, Denver, CO, employed by Republic Nationa l Bank
Reb ecca Ensor, 3300 S. Washington St., Englewood, CO
Mike Nilges, 3234 S. Washington St., Englewood, CO
Vera Craig, 8190 W. 8th Place, Lakewood, CO
Walter O'Brien, 1000 S. Monaco, Denver, CO
Robert S. Briola, 725 East Floyd Avenue, Englewood, CO
Because of the lateness of the hour of adjournment, Mr. Sty es stated that a decision
would not be rend ered until the next meeting on October 13, 1982.
LLOYD BRYAN MOVED, AND RON BLANCHARD SECONDED, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AYES:
NAYS:
The motion carried.
ENO.Tr
Recording Secretary
/bJC
Donald Styes, Ronald Blanchard, Lloyd Bryan
None
* * *
•
I . •
•
•
• •
5 E
MINlITES
ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD
October 12, 1982
Chairman Bob Currie introduced Mr. Peter Vargas, Assistant City Manager, who
addressed the Board regarding the circumstances of funding being denied the
Library by City Council for the automated management system at the pre sent
time.
Chairman Currie called the regular meeting of the Library Advisory Board to
order at 7 :57 p.m.
PRESENT: Bob Currie, Wilma Ankrum, Marietta Brown, Norm Kerswill,
Joe Rathburn, Dorothy Wheelehan
ABSENT: Jerry Valdes, Debbie Dix, Kay Van Valkenburg
ALSO
PRESENT : Sharon Winkle, Director of Libraries
Donna Gottberg, Recording Secretary
Roll call was taken and a quorum declared present.
Mr. Currie turned the meeting over to Ms. Winkle for the Director's Report.
With the funding being denied for the automated management system at the
present time, Ms. Winkle suggested the Board propose to Council an interim
process until such funding is available. This will involve approximately $11,000
per year for processing of books and materials through SEMBCS. She will have
a written report on this process at the November meeting.
Denver Public Library (DPL) is again participating in the Central Colorado Li-
brary System (CCLS) reciprocal borrowing. Arapahoe County residents are able
to use DPL in a walk-in basis only. This is a one year solution at the present
time.
Ms. Winkle noted that she will sign a proposal regarding cooperative collection
development in Arapahoe County. This item will be on the agenda for the joint
board meeting in October.
Ms. Winkle has asked the Judge to issue a suDU11ons to a family in Englewood who
has retained numerous book s and materials belonging to the Library .
Ms. Winkle has reports available on the Summer Reading Program and Story Time.
Both had substantial increases in participation over last year .
A reminder of the Colorado Library Association (CLA) Conference to be held
Octob r 20 -24.
Ch irman's Choice
Mr. Currie gave a presentation that he will give t the CLA Conference on Sat -
urd y, Octob r 23, regarding a state-wid book sale, After th presentation
ther e w discu i on nd que tion nd answer period . The Board agreed to support
11r . Curri e in hi pre s ent t i on .
c ontinued ....
I • •
-
•
•
• •
-2-
Ms . Dix, Ms. Wheelehan and Ms. Brown volunteered to help cashier during the
November 13 Book Sale at the Library.
Ms. Dix, Ms. Wheelehan, Ms . Ankrum and Mr . Rathrurn volunteered to help with
the Mayor's Christmas Tree Lighting Party on December 10 . Cookies will also
be donated.
Members' Choice
There was a brief discussion on the Suggestion Book Comments.
Jo e Rathrurn reminded the Board of the Pan.cake Breakfast on Saturday, October
16 at the Malley Center.
The Statistical Report for September was briefly discussed.
82-25 MOTION: To accept the Minutes from the September 14, 1982 Meeting as written.
Moved by: Joe Rathrurn
Seconded by: Wilma Ankrum
Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned at 9:22 p.m .
10-13-82 dg
• •
I • •
•
•
• •
5 F
September 30, 1982
TO: Andy Mccown, City Manager '' Services J:)11• FROM: Gary R. Diede, Director of Engineering
SUBJECT: OUT-OF-STATE TRIP REPORT (APWA CONGRESS & EQUIPMENT SHOW IN HOUSTON)
This year, the International Public Works Congress and Equipment Show was held
in Houston, Texas on September 11-16. The theme was "Putting Pride to Work" and
featuring a wide range of presentations on current public works activities and
problems from both technical and managerial viewpoints. Over 6,000 registrants
were on hand to observe the single largest and most diversified display of equip-
ment and supplies.
Houston itself was a pleasant surprise to me, as I had heard from other people
while I lived in Texas some ten years ago that Houston was a dirty place with
snobbish, wealthy oilmen. In fact, I thought Houston was quite clean and well-
maintained. The streets were in good repair and well swept. The downtown area
was also very clean with active sounds of new construction. Around the conven-
tion center alone, there were four new office towers being raised.
The keynote address at the Congress was presented by Fred W. Friendly, former
president of CBS News in New York. He emphasized the communication gap between
the news media and the government employees, stating that we both have a responsi-
bility to provide truthful and accurate news coverage . Too often, the public
employee wi ll avoid the news reporter only to find a distorted story misunder-
standing the facts. If the public employee is not available for explanations,
the reporter relies on his best understanding, perhaps from only the "other
side " to wr i te his story. His message to all publ ic leaders is to personally
meet and get to know your local newspaper r ep or ter and editor so that a direct
line of communication is al way s available to ans we r qu estio ns and offer explanat ions.
Another program that made an impression on me was "T he Baltimore Story",which
wa s a city promotion sound/slide film. Through excellent graphics and fade-in/out
slides, this display showed the historic as well as current activities and accom-
plishments of the City of Baltimore. I guess I related that need for the City
of Englewood in promoting its Downtown Development Plan.
Former U.S. Attorney General, Benjamin Civiletti, discussed the recent Supreme
Court decision of Community Communication Co. vs. the City of Bould er. The
significance of the case was that cities are not exempt or immune to the anti-
trust laws. This is a complete reversal from what the courts had determined
before this time. The Boulder case revolved around an exclusive cable TV contract.
Conti nu ing education was again discussed at this year's conference. There are
so many pros and cons on this subject. Of approximately 1,000,000 practicing
engineers, only one-third of them are Registered Professional Engi neers with
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
Andy Mccown, City Manager -2-September 30, 1982
P.E. licenses. Therefore, requ1r1ng continuing education for license renewal
would affect only 30 % of the engineers . Registration is not mandatory,
except for some employment positions and professional stamps required on
des ig n drawings . Although mandatory cont i nuing education is not at this time
a high priority of the engineering profession, voluntary continuin g education
is a must for all engineers to maintain a high degree of standards and know-
ledge of the eng i neering field . It is felt that engineers who do not keep
up with the growth of their profession are eas ily identifi ed and will lose
their appeal and employers' confidence .
Overall, I felt that the conference was well planned and attended, with a great
deal of the credit going to Jimmie Schindewolf, the Director of Publ ic Works
for Houston.
A final note : For those of you who think it is hum i d in your shower~ Houston
adds a new dimension in relative humi dity'.
GR0/1 do
I • •
•
•
• •
MEMORANDUM
TO: Andy Mccown, City Manager
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
S. P. Trunck, R. K. Steinberg, Fire Department
October 13, 1982
Nashville Seminar -Hazardous Materials Tactics Course
We would like express our gratitude for the opportunity to attend the
Tennessee Emergency Management Agency's Hazardous Materials Tactics Course
held in Nashville, Tennessee September 20-24, 1982.
The course was the final week of a three week program to certify us as
Hazardous Materials Technicians. Due to our previous attendance of a basic
Hazardous Materials Course held at the Colorado Training Institute, we
were allowed to forego attendance of the "A" course , "Hazardous Materials
for First Responders". In addition, due to our background in chemistry,
we were allowed to skip attendance of the "B" course , "The Chemistry of
Hazardous Materials", if we were to take and pass the "B" course final exam.
We each passed the exam with little difficulty. By attending and success-
fully completing the "C" course, "Basic Hazardous Materials Tactics", we
received full certification as Hazdrdous Materials Technicians.
The "C" course entailed the basic tactics and management methods for deal ing
with Hazardous Materials Incidents. Each class of Hazardous Materials were
covered in detail. The nine classes of Hazardous Materials are: Explosives,
Compressed Gases, Flammable Liquids, Flmmable Solids, Oxidizers, Poisons,
Irritants, Corrosives, and Radioactive Materi ls. In addition to classroom
training, field trips to rail and highway shipping facilities , bulk storage
facilities, and transfer facilibies with instruction from on site personnel
were held. Addition 1 topics covered in rela ion to the Hazard classes
were: Recognition, Personal Protec ion Gear, Containment of Spills,
Neutralization, ToXl.c Clouds, and Inciden Mang nt. Emphasis was placed
on initial stabilization of an inci h long-range effects
of Hazardous Materi ls Incidents .
We feel th t with instruction and training o as high a caliber as this , we
are better able to pl c in service and manag our Haz rdous Materials
Respons Unit. W also f l that the cours is good nough to consider
bringing th instructors to pres nt th course to
Hazardous Ma eriale team ro Fire Academy.
Th inatruc ion w receiv din the cl 11room and through the field trips
was supple111ented by visita to th Davidson Coun y H zardoua Materials R -
sponse Unit locat din th Metro Fire Dep r nt Sta ion 12 and informal I • •
-
•
~dy Mccown
Page Two
•
• •
sessions with the instructors. Through these additional sessions, a great
deal of practical and proven methods and techniques were shown to us. We
want to thank you again for we feel that the experience was invaluable.
Respectfully s~mitted,
.4., ~ J / /,/
~ . ./.< (, 7 ,<--I',
s. P. Trunck (
Training Coordinator
"t'.K.~~y
R. K. Steinberg
Captain
SPT/RXS/dm
cc: Chief Broman
•
I • •
In
•
•
• •
BY AU THORITY
ORDINANCE NO .
SE R I ES OF 1 9B ~2~~~
7 A
COUNCIL BILL NO . 41
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER FITZPATRICK
AN ORDINANCE AMEND I NG T I TLE IX, CHAPTER 2 , OF THE ENGLEWOOD
MUNICIPAL CODE OF '6 9, AS AMENDED, BY REPEA LING AND REENACTING
S ECTION S 1 THR OUGH 8, IN CLUS I VE, AND ADDIN G NEW S ECTIONS 9 THROUGH
1 9, INCLUSIVE, RELAT I NG TO
THE CONTROL OF AMUSE MEN T ES TABLISHMENT S , CO MM ONLY KNOWN AS
"AMU SEMENT DEVICES OR DINANCE ", AND DECLARING AN EM ERGENCY.
WHEREA S , the r e e x i st s a pr ol if e r a t io n of Amusement Centers i n
t he City of Engle wood ; a n d
WHEREA S , there is a need to mon ito r an d co n t ro l Amusement
Cen ters;
NOW, TH ERE FORE , BE IT ORDAI NED BY THE CITY CO UN C IL OF THE C ITY
OF ENGLEWOO D , COLORADO, AS FOLLO WS :
S e c tion 1 . Subsections 1 through 8 , inclusive , of Chapter 2 of
Title IX of the '69 Engle wood Municipal Code is hereby amended to
re ad as fo llows:
9-2-1 : TITLE
This Ordinance shall be kno wn as the Engle wood Amusement
Devic e s Or dinance .
9-2-2: DEFINITIONS
As used in this Ordinance of the Municipal Code o f the City
of Englewood:
(a) "Amusement arcade" shall mean a place or establishment
where an individual, association, partnership, or corporation
maintains more than ten amusement devices.
{b) "Amusement center" shall mean a place or establishment
where an individual, association, partnership, or corporation
maintains more than four (4) and less than eleven (11) amusement
devices, either as a sole business or in conjunction with some
other business.
(c) "Amusement premise" shall man a plac or establishment
where an individual, association, partnership , or corporation
maintains four (4) or 1 ss amusem nt d vices incidental to th ir
min business. An mu s ment pr mis is not subject to th
r quirements of 9-2-4 of this Ordinance bu is subject to all
r quirements in 9-2-8 of this Ordinanc •
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
(d) "Amusement devices" shall mean any device which upon
insertion of a coin , slug, token , place, or disc, or payment of a
co nsideration directly therein , may be used by the public as a
gain, entertainment, amusement, a test of skill, either mental or
physical , whether o r n ot registering a score , and shall include ,
but n ot be limited to, pool tables , snooker tables , foosball
tables , electronic games , coin-operated movies , and pi n ball
machines of every kind and description , but shall not i n clude
radios , devices that provide music only, televisions ca rry ing
comme r cial broadcasts only , devices for bowling such as bo wling
la n es , non-coin-operated pool and billiard tables , or fi x ed-stand ,
coin-o p erated kiddie rides .
(e) "A pplicant" shall mea n any individual , association ,
partnership or corporation requesting a license pursuant to this
chapter .
(f) "Manager• shall mean an individual who manages , directs ,
supervises , oversees, and administers the acts and transactions of
the agents or servants of any establishment governed by this
ch apter or who , through his own actions , directs , oversees , and
administers the affairs of any such establishment .
9-2-3: LICENSE REQUIRED
(a) No amusement arcade or center shall conduct business
wi thin the City without a valid li c ense as provided herein .
(b) No amusement arcade or c enter shall c onduct business
withi n the City without paying the annual fee placed upon amusement
de v ic es required by 9-2-8.
(c) Any a mu seme nt arcade or c enter whi c h holds a liquor
lice nse granted by the Cit y of Englewood is n ot subject to the
r equi rements of 9-2-4 of this Ord ina nce but is s ub jec t to all
requirements in 9-2-8 of his Ordi nan ce .
9-2-4:
The appliction
licens shall be m de
ccompanied by he fe
follo wing information:
LICENSE APP LIC AT ION
for an musement arcade or amusement center
to the Director of Finan ce and shall be
required by 9-2-8 nd shall contain the
(a) th nam nd ddress of the establishment ;
(b) the nam , ddress , g , date nd pl ce of birth , eder 1
id ntification numb rand Social Security numb r of the
applicant(s) nd m n g r(s) of the st bl sh ment ;
2
I •
•
•
• •
(c) prior felony convictions, including nolo contendre pleas
of the applicant(s) and manager(s);
(d) prior misdemeanor convictions involving moral turpitud e ,
including nolo contendre pleas, of the applicant(s) and
manager (s);
(e) Where applicant is a cor poration, association,
partnership , or private club , the information required in
paragraphs (bl , (c), (d) shall be furnished as to each officer of
the association, each partner of a partnership, each officer of the
corporation , each member of the board of directors of the
co rporation, and the holders of ten percent (10%) or more of the
co rporate stock of any class ;
(f) Evidence from the department of Community Development of
the City that the location of the proposed amusement arcade meets
all of the zoning requirements of the City;
(g) Copy of a lease or proof of ownership by the applicant;
(h) The number of amusement devices to be maintained at the
amusement arcade.
(i) Any additional information requested by the Director of
Finance reasonably needed to enforce this Ordinance.
9-2-5: LICENSE APPROVAL
(a) Application for the license required by 9 -2-4 shall be
reviewed by the Director of Finan ce . The Director of Finance shall
have an investigation co nducted by the police department sufficient
to verify all the information required by this chapter. On
completion of this investigation , the Director of Finance shall
either approve or disapprove the application.
(b) No licens shall be issued to any applicant unless
approved by the Direc or of Financ • Th Director of Finance shall
r fuse to issu ny license for n musement arcade or amusement
center if he Dir cto r of Financ finds ny of the following:
( l) Tha
ye rs.
(2) Th
wen y-one y ars.
h pplic nt is under he ge of twenty-on
ny design ed manager is under the ag of
3
•
I • •
•
• -
(3) That the applicant, manager, or either of them, has
made false stateme n t s up o n th e appli c ation.
(4) That the appli c ant, manager , association officer,
any partner of a partnership, officer of the corporation , member of
the board of directors of the corporation , or a 10% or more
shareholder of the co rpor ation has been convicted of a felony or
misdemeanor involving moral turpitude or lacks good moral character.
(5) The applicant manager, any associ ation officer , any
partner of the partnership, any officer of the corporation, any
member of the board of directors of the co rporation, or any 10% or
more shareholder of the cor pora tion has had a license for such
business revoked, suspended , or denied within two (2) years prior
to the application or has been determined to be a nuisance within
two (2) years prior to the application.
(6) That the proposed amusement arcade or amusement
center is located within five hundred (500) feet of the boundary of
any public or parochial school grou nds, said distance to be
computed by direct measurement from the nearest property line of
the land used for school purposes to the nearest portion of the
building in which the amusement arcade or amusement center is located .
(7) That the proposed amusement arcade or amusement
center is located within one thousand (1 ,000) feet of another
amusement arcade or amusement center .
9-2-6: LICENSE TERM
All li c ense s granted pur s uant to this chapter shall be for a
t e rm of o ne (1) year. Said term shall commence on January l of
e a c h y e ar and term i nat e on De c ember 31 of the same year.
App lica t i on s for a lic en s e o cc urring at any other time during th e
year shall be t r eated the s am e as i f they were made for one
calendar year and shall e r minate on t he s am e d ate a s al l other
licens s issued for the sa me year and no proratio n s h a l l be p rmitted .
9-2-7: LICE NSE RE NEWA L
Rn w 1 of any o the lic en ses g r ante d pursuant to this
chapt r may be had by p y men t of th e lice n se f ee along with a
stat m nt hat t h e info r mation l is t ed on t he o riginal lie nse
pplication is still rue a nd co rr ect , o r a st atement listing tho se
items of info rm ation requi r ed fo r a license application which hav e
cha ng d in the y ar since the licens was g r a nted or last r newed.
Failur to r ne w lie nse i n a timel y m nn r s hall be grounds for
t rmi n a ion and r evoc tion of s id licens n d s hall be gr o unds for failu r e tor ne w id liens •
4
•
I • •
•
•
•
• •
9-2-8: LICENSE FEES
Fees for persons licensed under the provisions of this
cha pter are as follows:
(a) Amusement arcade and a mu sement cente r, annual fee .
Applicants or holders of an amuse men t arcade or an amusement center
license shall pay a yearly fee of Fi fty Dollars ($50) per amusement
device maintained upon the premis es.
(b) Amusement premise, annual fee. An amusement premise
shall pay a yearly fee of Fifty Dollars ($50) per amusement device
maintained upon the premises .
(c) Amusement arcade and amusement center, investigation
fee . Applicants for an amusement arcade license shall pay an
investigation fee of Seventy-five dollars ($75) to cover the cost
of investigation required by this chapter .
(d) Additional devices acquired during license period. All
applicants and holders of amusement center or amusement arcade or
amusement premise licenses shall report to the Director of Finance
the addition of any amusement device or devices to their premises
within fifteen days of said addition and tender to the Director of
Finance at that time the fee of Fifty Dollars ($50) for each
additional amusement device for the remainder of the original
license period. Failure to report additional amusement devices to
the City Clerk shall constitute a violation of this chapter and be
grounds for revocation or suspension of the license granted
pursuant to this cha pter.
The Director of Finance shall issue a receipt for the
payment of these fees.
Section 2 . The '69 Englewood Munic ipal Code is hereby amended by
adding new subsections 9 through 19, inclusive , of Chapter 2 of
Title IX to read as follows:
9-2-9: DISPLAY ANO TRANSFER OF LICENSE
The holder of any license or receipt issued pursuant to the
t rms of this cha p er shall be subject to the following:
(a) The lie nse shall b permanently and conspiciously
displ ayed near the d vi e licensed •
(bl Any ch ng in ownership or man gm nt of an amusement
arc de or center must b r ported to the Director of Finance within
(sev n) 7 busin s d ys followin such ch nge •
•
I • •
•
•
•
• •
(c) Any license o r r ecei pt i ssu ed pur s u ant t o the terms o f
this c hap t er s ha ll not be t ra ns f e rab le to a ny o t he r loc ation i n t he
City . In th e e v e n t o f t ransfer o f o wn e r shi p o f the business at the
same l oc ation fo r whic h a l ic e nse o r t ax r e c e ipt is issued pursu a nt
to the terms of th is c hapt e r, a license may b e transferred to th e
n e w owner of the bu si ne ss ; provided, however, that appli c ation
t herefor stating the sam e information as required by 9-2-4 is first
pr e sented to the Di r ec t o r of Finance for approval or disapproval.
Approval or disapprova l o f such transfer shall be upon the same
te rms as approval o r d i sapproval of a li c ense under the terms of
t h i s chapter.
(d) The transfer ee o f a license under thi s chapter shall p a y
an additional annual f e e as required by 9-2 -8 when the license ha s
b ee n transferred during th e ca l endar y e ar.
(e) Where any li c ensee has a chang e i n manager or manager s
of h is establishment, and a new manager has no t previously been
a pproved as a manager b y the Director o f F i nan ce , he shall be
presented by th e holder o f the l i ce nse o r sh a ll present himself to
t h e o ffice o f the City Cle rk f or a ba c kg r o un d i nvestigation.
9-2 -1 0: GAMBL I NG PROHIBIT ED
Noth i ng in t his Arti c l e s ha ll be co n st rued to permit any
un la wful gambl ing o r wa g e r i ng wi t hin the Cit y.
9 -2-11: HOURS OF OPER ATION
No establishment licensed pursuant to this Art icl e shal l
allo w ope r ation of ny amusement device be ween the h o urs of 2 :00
A.M. a n d 7 :00 A .M.
9-2-12: MINORS ON PREMISES
Persons under 17 years of age shall not be in attendance at
premises where there is established , op rated , controlled ,
maintained, or kep n amusement device for h purpose of playing
or operating such d vice, or as a spectator, be ween the hours of
7:00 A.M. and 3:00 P .M. on regular school days . Minors lawfully
employed at such premiss may be on the pr mises while actually
working .
9-2-13:
No person sh 11 (
ol to obtain
wh re
kept n
llow any p
r m in in ,
ADMITTANCE OF MINORS
himself
on
f;
•
to b 17 y ar or
any premis s
en
I • •
n
-•
• •
9-2-14: LIGHTING
Amusemen t Ar ca d es s hall be brightly i lluminated at all times
so t hat all patron s a re ea s ily re c ogni z a bl e and a ll activities
wi t h in the arcade a r e e a sil y i d e nt i fiabl e .
9-2-15: LICENSE SUSPENSION, REVOCATION, DENIAL
(a) The Dire c tor of Finance shall either suspend, revoke, or
den y any license granted pursuant to this Article upon a finding of
a n y of the follow i ng factors:
(1) That any of the amusemen t devices maintained upon
the premises are being used for gambling purposes.
(2) That repeated disturbances o f public peace have
bee n occurring within the licensed establishment or upon any
pa rking areas, s id e walks, walkways, access ways or grounds
i mmediately adja c ent to the licensed premises involving patrons,
em ployees, or the ho l der of the license of the establishment.
(3) That the holder of the license or any employee
thereof is illegally offering for sal e , or i llegally allowing to be
co nsumed upon the licensed premises, or upon any parking areas,
si dewalks, walkways, access ways or grounds imme d iately adjacent to
the licensed premi ses , any c ontrol l ed subs tanc e defined in C.R.S.
1 973, 18-18-1 05 .
(4 ) Th at wher e not spec i fica ll y authorized by l aw,
malt , vinous, o r spi r it uo u s beverage s are b ei ng consumed on the
p r e mises wi th or without t h e con sen t of t h e owner by patrons o f the
licen s ed e st a blishment or wh er e su ch b eve r a g es a r e be ing consumed
by pat r o n s of the establishme n t u p on any pa r king a r eas , si dew alks ,
walkway s , access ways o r grou nds im mediately adjace n t to th e
licensed premises .
(5) Tha the holder of the license or an approved
manager is not upon the licensed premises at all times .
(6) That musement devices h v be n installed and/or
r being op rat don the premises of any musem nt arcad or
musement center for which the fee required by 9-2-8 hereof has no
b n p id or for which application has no be n made pursu nt to
9-2-4 h reof.
(7) Tha any amusement center or amusemen arcad is
elng maintained in such a way as to viol e any building code ,
zoning, or publi c heal h requir m nt impo d by city , coun y or
st t ordinance , law or regulation , or ny oh r provision of city
o rdinance , or a at or fed rall 1 w .
(8) Tha
en renew d in a 1
ny liens requir d ob renewed haa no
ly mann r as prescrib d in th1 ~r icle.
7
•
I • •
•
• •
(9) That any provisions of this Article has been
violat ed by the owner or manager of the amusement arcade, amus em en
c ente r, or that either such owner or manager has knowingly allow ed
the violation of any provision of this chapter to occur.
(10) That the use of the amusement devices in the
licensed establishment occurs during the hours where such operat ion
is prohibited pursuant to Section 11.
(11) That the use of the amusement devices by minors
under 17 years of age in the licensed establishment occurs duri ng
the hours where such operation is prohibited by 9-2-12 and 9-2-1 3 .
(12) That the holder of a license has been convicted of
a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude. Nolo contendr e
pleas are treated as convictions .
(13) That the distances required in 9-2-5 (b) (6) and
9-2-S(b) (7) has not been followed.
(b) Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the City from
taking any other enforcement action provided for by this Code or
the laws of the State of Colorado or of the United States.
9-2-16: APPEAL FROM A LICENSE SUSPENSION,
REVOCATION OR DENIAL
Any decision of the Director of Finance specified in this
Section may be applied by any aggrieved party to the City Council
by the filing of a written notice of appeal no later than twenty
(20) days after the date of the Director of Finance decision. Upon
receipt of such a notice of appeal, the appeal shall be placed on
the City Council's agenda and shall be heard as a public hearin g.
Any appeal from the City Council 's decision shall be to Arapahoe
County District Court.
9-2-17: VIOLATION; PENALTY
Any individual, ssociation, partnership or corporation
which is convicted of violation of any provision of this chap er
s hall be fined in a sum of not more than Three Hundred Dollars
($300) or shall b imprisoned not to exceed ninety days, or shall
b both so find and imprisoned.
9-2-18: EFFECTIVE DATE
All amus m nt reds or amus ment centers must apply for
ppropri t license within ninety (90) days after th ffec iv
hereof. All amusemen pr miss must pay the appropriate
l i cense fees within nin ty (90) days aft r th ffectiv dat
h e reof.
8
•
I • •
•
•
• •
9-2-1 9: SEVERABILITY
If for any reason any one or more sections , sentence s ,
c laus es, or parts of this Ordinance are held invalid , such
invalid ity shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the rema ining
provisio ns of this Ordinance. It is the intent of the City Co un cil
that the provisions of the Ordinance shall be severable.
Sect ion 3 . This Ordinance is necessary for the immediate
pres ervt1on of the public health and safety and an emergency exi s s
by reason of the fact that the enactment of this Ordinance is
neces sary to the orderly and efficient administration of th e
busi ness within the City of Englewood; therefore, this Ordin ance
shal l take effect following adoption immediately upon the signa ture
of this Ordinance by the Mayor approving the same.
Introduced , read in full, and passed on first reading on the 4t h da y
of Oc tober , 1982.
Published as a 3ill for an Ordinance on the 6th day of Oc tober, 1982 .
Read by title and passed on final reading on the 18t h day of Oct0 er ,
1982 .
Published by title as Ordinance No·~~~~' Series of 1982, o n the
20t h day of October , 1982.
Eugene L. Otis , Mayor
At es
ex o ficio City Clerk-T reasurer
I , Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the Ci y of
nglewood , Color do , hereby certify that the above and foregoing is t r •,
ccur t and complete co py of the Ordinance passed on final re di ng nd
published by title as Ordinance No. , Se ri es of 1982 .
9
•
I • •
ORDINANCE NO.
S ERIE S OF 198=2~~~
•
• •
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO. 4 1
INTRODUCED BY COUNC IL
MEMBER FITZPATRICK
AN ORDINANCE AMEND ING TITLE IX, CHAPTER 2 , OF THE ENGLEWOOD
MUNICIPAL CODE OF '69 , AS AMENDED, BY REPEALING AND REENACTING
SECTIONS 1 THROUGH 8, INCLUSIVE, AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS 9 THROUGH
1 9, INCLUSIVE , RELATING TO
THE CONTROL OF AMUSEMENT ESTABLISHMENTS , COMMONLY KNOWN AS
"AMUSEMENT DEVICES ORDINANCE", AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, there exists a proliferation of Amusement Centers in
the City of Englewood; and
WHEREAS, there is a need to monitor and control Amusement
Centers;
NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLO WS:
Section 1. Subsections 1 through 8, inclusive, of Chapter 2 of
Title IX of the '69 Englewood Municipal Code is hereby amended to
read as follows:
9-2-1: TITLE
This Ordinance shall be known as the Englewood Amusement
Devices Ordinance.
9-2-2: DEFINITIONS
As used in this Ord inance of the Municipal Code of the City
of Eng le wood:
(a) "Amusement arcade" shall mean a place or establishment
where an individual , association , partnership, or corpo rat ion
maintains more than ten amusement devices.
(b) "Amusement center" shall mean a place or establishment
wh ere an individual, association , partnership, or co rporation
maintains more than four (4) and less than eleven (11) amusement
devices , either s sole business or in conjunctio n with some
other busines s.
(c) "Amus m nt pr mise" shall mean a place or establishment
wh re an individual , association , partn ership , or corporation
maintains four (4) or 1 ss amuse ment devic s incide ntal to th ir
main business. An amusement premise is not ubject to the
r quir m nt o -2-4 of this Ordina nce bu is subject to all
requir m n s in 9-2-8 o his Ordinanc •
I • •
•
• •
(di "Amusement devices" shall mean any device which upon
insertion of a coin , slug, token , place, or disc, or payment of a
consideration directly therein , may be used by the public as a
gain , entertainment, amusement, a test of skill, either mental or
physical , whether or not registering a score , and shall include,
but not be limited to , pool tables, snooker tables, foosball
tables , electronic games, coin-o perated movies, and pinball
machines of every kind and description, but shall not include
radios , devices that provide music only, televisions carrying
commercial broadcasts only, devices for bowling such as bowling
lanes , non-coin-operated pool and billiard tables , or fixed-stand,
coin-o perated kiddie rides.
(e) "Applicant" shall mean any individual , association ,
partnership or corporation requesting a license pursuant to this
chapter. (fl "Manager" shall mean an individual who manages , directs,
supervises, oversees, and administers the acts and transactions of
the agents or servants of any establishment governed by this
chapte r or who, through his own actions, directs, oversees, and
administers the affairs of any such establishment .
9-2-3: LICENSE REQUIRED
(a) No amusement arcade or center shall conduct business
within the City without a valid license as provided herein .
(b) No amusement arcade or center shall conduct business
within the City without paying the annual fee placed upon amusement
devices required by 9-2-8 .
(c) Any amusement arcade or cente r which holds a liquor
license granted by the City of Englewood is not subject to the
requirements of 9-2-4 of this Ordinance but is subject to all
requirements in 9-2-8 of this Ordinance.
-2-4: LICENSE APPLICATION
The appliction for an mus m n arcad or amusement center
license shall b made to the Dir ctor of Finance and shall be
accompani d by the fee required by 9-2-8 nd shall contain the
following information:
( ) th nam nd dress of the establishment;
(b) the name, ddr ss , ag , da e and pl ce of birth, federal
identification numb r nd Social Security number of the
applican (s) nd man g r(s) of the est blishment;
2
I •
•
•
• •
(cl prior felony convictions, including nolo contendre pleas
of the applicant(sl and manager(sl;
(dl prior misdemeanor convictio ns involv ing moral turpitud e ,
including nolo contendre pleas, of the applicant(sl and
manager (sl;
(el Wher e appli cant is a corporation , association ,
partnership, or private clu b, the information required in
paragraphs (bl, (cl , (dl shall be furnished as to each officer of
the associat ion , each partner of a partnership , each officer of the
corporation, each member of the board of directors of the
co rporation, and the holders of ten percent (10%l or more of the
corpo r ate stock of any class;
(fl Evidence from the department of Community Development of
the City that the location of the proposed amusement arcade meets
all of the zoning requirements of the City;
(gl Copy of a lease or proof of ownership by the applicant;
(hl The number of amusement devices to be maintained at the
amusement arcade.
(il Any additional information requested by the Dire cto r of
Finance reasonably needed to enforce this Ordinance .
9-2-5: LICENSE APPROVAL
(al Application for the lice nse requ ired by 9-2-4 shall be
reviewed by the Director of Finance . The Director of Finance shall
have an investigation conducted by the police department sufficient
to verify all the information required by this chapter . On
completion of this investigation , the Director of Finance shall
either approve or disapp rove the application.
(bl No licens
approved by the Dir
refus to issu any
center if the Direc
shall be issued to any applicant unless
ctor of Finance. The Directo r of Finance shall
license for an musemen rcade or amusement
or of Fin nee finds any of the following:
( 1 l Th t h pplicant is under he age of twenty-one
years.
(2) Th
wenty-on ye rs.
ny design ted manager is under th age or
3
I • •
-
•
•
• •
(3) That the ap p lican t , manag e r, o r either of them , has
mad e fal se statements upon the ap p lication .
(4 ) That the ap p lican t, manag e r, a s s o ci ation officer,
a ny partner of a partnership , office r of the co rporation, member o f
th e boar d of di r ecto r s of the co rpo r atio n, o r a 10% or mor e
shareholder o f th e corpo r ation h as been co nvi c ted of a felony or
misdemeanor i nv olvi n g mo r al tur pitude or l a c ks good moral
c hara c ter .
(5 ) The app lic a nt manager , any association officer, any
p artner of the partn e r shi p, any o fficer of the corporation , any
member of the board o f dir ecto r s o f the corporation, or any 10% o r
more shareholder of the co rpo rat i on has had a license for such
business revoked , suspende d , or denied within two (2) years prior
t o the application or h a s been determined to be a nuisance within
t wo (2) years prior to the app li cation .
(6) Tha t the proposed amus e ment arcade or amusement
c enter is l o cated wi th i n f i ve hundred (500) feet of the boundary of
any publi c or parochial school grounds , said distance to be
co mputed by dire c t me a su rement from the nearest prqpe rty line of
the land used for sc ho ol purpos e s to the nearest portion of the
building in whi c h th e am u sement ar c ade or amusement center is
l o c ated.
(7) Tha t t he pr o pose d am u sement ar c ade or amusement
ce nt e r is l oc at e d wi t hin one tho u s and (1 ,0 00 ) feet of another
a mu s ement ar c ad e o r a musem en t ce nter.
9 -2-6: LICE NS E T ERM
All licenses g r anted pu r suant to this chapter shall be for a
term of o n e (1) year . Said term shall co mmen ce on January 1 of
each yea r and terminate on Decembe r 31 of th e s ame year.
Applications for a license occu rr i n g at a ny other t i me dur i ng th e
year shall be treated the same as if they we r e ma d e for one
calendar year and shall terminate on the same date as all other
licenses issu d for the sam year and no proration shall be
permitted.
9-2-7: LICENSE RENEWAL
Renewal of any of th licenses granted pursuant to this
chapt r may be had by p yment of the license fee alo ng with a
st tement th t the information listed on the original license
pplicatlon is s 111 true and co r rect , or a stat ment listing those
it m of in orma ion re uired for a license app licatio n wh ic h ha v e
ch nged in th y arsine th license was granted or last r e n e wed .
Failure to r n w 1 c ns n a tim ly mann r shall be gr ou n ds for
ermina ion and revoc ion of s id lie nse nd shall b g r ou nd s for
failure o renews id licens •
4
I • •
I n
-
•
•
• •
9-2-8: LICENSE FEES
Fees for persons licensed under the provisions of this
chapter are as follows:
(a) Amusement arcade and amusement cente r, annual fee.
Applicants or holders of an amusement arcade or an amusement center
license shall pay a yearly fee of Fifty Dollars ($50) per amusement
device maintained upon the premises.
(bl Amusemen t premise, annual fee. An amusement premise
shall pay a yearly fee of Fifty Dollars ($50) per amusement device
maintained upon the premises.
(c) Amusement arcade and amusement center, investigation
fee. Applicants for an amusement arcade license shall pay an
investigation fee of Seventy-five dollars ($75) to cover the cost
of investigation required by this c hapter.
(d) Additional devices acquired during license period. All
applicants and holders of amusement center or amusement arcade or
amusement premise licenses shall report to the Director of Finance
the addition of any amusement device or devices to their premises
within fifteen days of said addition and tender to the Director of
Finance at that time the fee of Fifty Dollars ($50) for each
additional amusement device for the remainder of the original
license period. Failure to report additional amusement devices to
the City Clerk shall constitute a violation of this chapter and be
grounds for revocation or suspension of the license granted
pursuant to this chapter .
The Director of Finance shall issue a receipt for the
payment of these fees.
Section 2 . The '69 Englewood Municipal Code is hereby amended by
adding new subsections 9 through 19, inclusive , of Chapter 2 of
Title IX to read as follows:
9-2-9: DISPLAY AND TRANSFER OF LICENSE
The holder of any license or receipt issued pursuant to the
terms of this chapter shall be subject to the following:
(a) The license shall be permanently and conspiciously
displayed near the devic licensed.
(b) Any change in ownership or management of an musement
arcade or center must be reported to the Director of Finance within
(seven) 7 busin ss days following such change.
5
I • •
•
• •
(c) An y license or receipt issued pur suan t to the terms of
this c hapter shall not be tra nsfe rabl e t o any o t he r location in the
Cit y . In the event of transfer of ownership of the business at the
sa me location for whi ch a license or tax receipt is issued pursuant
to the terms of this chapter , a license may be transferred to the
new owner of the bus i ness; provided, however, that application
therefor stating the same information as requ ired by 9-2-4 is first
presented to the Director of Finance for approval or disapproval.
Approval or disapproval of such transfer shall be upon the same
terms as approval or disapproval of a license under the terms of
this chapter.
(d) The transferee of a license under this chapter shall pay
an additional annual fee as required by 9-2-8 when the license has
been transferred during the cale ndar year.
(e) Where any licensee has a change in manager or managers
of his establishment, and a new manager has not previously been
approved as a manager by the Director of Finance, he shall be
presented by the holder of the license or shall present himself to
the office of the City Clerk for a background investigation.
9-2-10: GAMBLING PROHIBITED
Nothing in this Article shall be construed to permit any
unlawful gambling or wagering within the City .
9-2-11: HOURS OF OPER ATION
No establishment licensed pursuan t to this Art icle shall
allow operation of any amusement device b etween the hours of 2:00
A .M. and 7:00 A.M.
9-2-12: MI NOR S ON PREMI SES
Person s under 17 years of age shall not be in attendance at
premises wher e there is established , operated , controlled ,
maintained , or kept an amuse ment device for the purpose of playing
or operating such d vice , or as a spectator , bet ween the hours of
7 :00 A .M. and 3:00 P.M . on regular school d ys . Minors la wfully
employed at such pr mises may be on the premises while actually
working .
9-2-13:
sh 11 f
old r
hour
ADMITTANCE OF MINORS
n
on
fi
I • •
•
• •
9-2-14: LIGHTING
Amusement Arcades shall be brightly ill uminated at all time s
so that all patrons are easily recogni z able an d all activities
with in the ar c ade are easily identifiabl e .
9-2-15: LICENSE SUSPENSION, REVOCATION, DENIAL
(a) The Director of Finance shall either suspend, revoke, o r
den y any license granted pursuant to this Article upon a finding of
any of the following factors:
(1 ) That any of the amusement devices maintained upon
the premises are being used for gambling purposes.
(2) That repeated disturbances of public peace have
been occurring within the licensed establishment or upon any
parking areas, sidewalks, walkways, access ways or grounds
immediatel y adjacent to the licensed premises involving patrons,
emplo yees, or the holder of the license of the establishment.
(3) That the holder of the license or any employee
thereof is illegally offering for sale, or i llegally allowing to be
con sumed upon the licensed premises, or upon any parking areas,
si dewalks, walkways, access ways or grounds immediately adjacent to
the licensed premises, any controlled substance defined in C.R.S.
19 73, 18-18-105.
(4) That where not spec ific al ly authorized by law,
malt , vinous, or spirituous beverages are bei ng consumed on the
p rem is es with or without the cons ent of the owner by patrons of the
lice nsed establ ish ment o r where such beverages are being consumed
by patrons of the establishment upon any parking areas , sidewalks,
walkways, access way s or grounds immediately adjacent to the
licensed premises.
(5) That the holder of the license or an approved
manager is not upon the lie nsed premises at all times .
(6) That musement d vices h ve be n installed and/or
are being operated on the premiss of any amusement arcad or
amusement center for which th fee required by 9-2-8 hereof has not
been paid or for whi ch application has no been made pursuant to
9-2-4 her of.
(7) That any amusem nt center o r amus m nt a r c d i
being maint ined in such a way as to viol t any building cod ,
zoning , or public health r quirem nt imposed by city , county or
sta e ordi nan c , law or r gulation , or any other provi ion o city
ordinance , ors t or d rall law.
(8) Tha any lie nae requ r d to b rtn wed ha• no
been ren w d in a im ly manner as pr scrib d in his Articl e .
7
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
(91 That any provisions of this Article has been
viola ted by the owner or manager of the amusement arcade, amus ement
cente r, or that either such owner or manager has knowingly allowed
the violation of any provision of this chapter to occur.
(10) That the use of the amusement devices in the
licensed establishment occurs during the hours where such operati on
is prohibited pursuant to Section 11.
(111 That the use of the amusement devices by minors
under 17 years of age in the licensed establishment occurs during
the hours where such operation is prohibited by 9-2-12 and 9-2-13.
(12 1 That the holder of a license has been convicted of
a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude. Nolo contendr e
pleas are treated as convictions .
(131 That the distances required in 9-2-5 (bl (61 and
9-2-5 (bl (7) has not been followed.
(b) Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit the City from
taking any other enforcement action provided for by this Code or
the laws of the State of Colorado or of the United States.
9-2-16: APPEAL FROM A LICENSE SUSPENSION,
REVOCATION OR DENIAL
Any decision of the Director of Finan ce specified in thi s
Secti on may be applied by any aggrieved party to the City Counc il
by the filing of a written notice of appeal no later than twenty
(20) days after the date of the Director of Finance decision. Upon
receipt of such a notice of appeal, the appeal shall be placed on
the City Council's agenda and shall be heard as a public hearing.
Any appeal from the City Council's decision shall be to Arapaho e
County District Court .
9-2-17: VIOLATION; PENALTY
Any individual, association, partnership or corporation
which is convicted of violation of any provision of this chapter
shall be fined in a sum of not more than Three Hundred Dollars
($300) or shall be imprisoned not to exceed ninety days, or shall
be both so fined and imprisoned.
9-2-18: EFFECTIVE DATE
All musem nt arcades or amua ment cent rs mu t apply for
th appropri te licens within ninety (90) days after the effectiv
date hereof. All amusement pr mises mu t p y th appropriate
liens fees within nin ty (90) days after he effectiv date
her of.
8
•
I • •
•
•
• •
9-2 -1 9: SEVERABILITY
I f for any reason any one or more s ect i o ns, se n te n ces ,
cl auses , or parts of this Ordinance are held invalid, suc h
invalidity shall not affect, impair, or invalidate t h e r emaining
p r o visions of this Ordinance . It is the intent of the Ci ty Council
t hat the provisions of the Ordinance shall be severable.
Sect ion 3. This Ordinance is necessary for the immediate
p r es ervt1on of the public health and safety and an emergen cy e x ist s
by reason of the fact that the enactment of this Ordinance is
ne cessary to the orderly and efficient administration of t he
busi ness within the City of Englewood; therefore, this Ordi nance
shall take effect following adoption immediately upon the s i gnatur e
of t his Ordinance by the Mayor approving the same.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading o n the 4th day
of Oc tober, 1 982.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 6th day of October, 1982 .
Read by title and passed on final reading on th e 18th day of October ,
1 98 2 .
Published by title as Ordinance No·-~~~' Seri e s of 1982 , on he
20 th day of October, 1982.
Eugene L. Otis , Mayor
Attest:
ex officio Ci ty Cle rk-Treasurer
I , Gary R. Higbee , e x offici o City Cler k -Tr easurer of th e Ci y of
Englewood , Colorado , here by ce r ti fy t hat the a b ove and foregoing is a t r ue ,
accurate and complete copy of the o r di n ance pa ss e d on final read ing and
published by title as Ordina n ce No. , Series of 1982 .
9
I • •
-
ORDI NANCE NO. ,,L/ ~
SERIES OF 198 2
BY AUTHORITY
•
• •
COUNC IL BILL NO. 44
INTRODU CED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER NEAL
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN JIGREEMENT WITH BOARD OF COUNTY co,,t,tISS I ONERS,
ARAPAHOE COUNTY, STATE OF (X)LQRAOO, PROVIDING MtmJAL A.SS I STANCE IN PROVIDING
TRANS PORTATION 'ID SENIORS AND HANDICAPPED SENIORS.
WHEREAS, Arapahoe County, through Arapahoe County Tr a ns por tation
Se rvices, provides transportation services to seniors in Arapahoe County;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood provides transportat ion serv ices to
senio r s i n the City of Englewood; and
WHEREAS, coordination of services between the County of Arapahoe and
City of Englewood would reduce operating costs through effic ient scheduling;
00W, 'ffiEREFORE, BE IT OODAINED BY 'ffiE CITY COUNCIL OF 'ffiE CITY OF
ENG LEW:X)D, COLORADO:
Section 1 . An agreement titled "Arapahoe County Transpor t ation Se r vices
Le tte r of Agreement/Coordination" is hereby approved by City Co uncil , a copy
of wh ich is at tached hereto and marked Exhibit A.
Section 2 . That said agreement, consisting of two pag es , generally provides
as follows :
a . Ar apahoe Co unty Transportation Services and the City of Englewood
mutually agree to coo r d inate and cooperate wi th ea ch other in the delivery of
transportation se r vices to seniors and hand icapped seniors loti o reside in
Arapahoe County .
b. Arapahoe County Tr anspor t a tion Services will act as broker for 11
transportation requests .
Sec ion 3. City Council of the City of Englewood hereby authorizes th Mayor
sign said agre nt for and on behalf of the City of Engl wood and th ex officio
City Clerk-Treasurer to attest the same.
Introduced , te d in full , and passed on first re din on th
4th d y of October, 1982 .
Publi hed Bill for Ordin nee on th 6th y of
r, 1982 .
d by i le on fin l reading on th 18th y 0
l 82.
I • •
•
•
• •
Published by t1tl Ordinanc o. ___ , Series of 1982, on
he ___ day of _____ , 1982.
Eugen L. O is, Mayor ___ _
Attest:
ex of fi cio City Clerk-Treasurer
I , Gary R. Higbee , ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City
of Englewoo d, Colorado, hereby ce rtify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and compl ete copy of the Ordinance passed on
final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. , Se r ies
o f 19 8 2 .
Gary R. Higbee
•
I • •
•
•
• •
ARAPAHOE COUNTY TRANSPOR'fATI ON SERVI CES
LETTER OF AGREEMENT/COORDINATION
THIS AGREEMENT entered into this da y of , l'-f8'
by and for the mutual benefit of THE 8000 OF COUNTY C0""1ISSIONERS F
ARAPAHOE CO UNTY, STATE OF COLORAOO , ARAPAHOE COUNTY TRANSPORTAT ION er: VICE~,
hereinafter referred to as "ACTS ", and the CITY OF ENGLEWCX)D , COLORADO ,
ENGLEWJOD SENIOR SURREY , hereinafter referred to as "ESS ".
In consideration of the mu tual promises and covenan ts contarned h rein ,
ACTS and ESS agree and consent to the following items of coordina aJ
cooperation , to wit:
1. That ACTS will only provide transpor ation to seniors and
handicapped seniors when all other transportation agencies opera t ing w1 tt1111
Arapahoe County are L11able to provide tr nsportation to said seni o r s.
2 . ACTS agrees to relay all necessary de raph ic information to ESS
about a senior who has requested transportation,
3 . ACTS will the liaison for o ther tr nsportation agenci es oµ t21tir~J
w1Lhin Arapahoe County . As such , ACTS will coordinate its tr nsporta ion
activities with othe r area transpor ation enc ies to avoid duplication of
tr nsportation services within the County . Each agency 's trans rl tion
er i teria will be taken into account by ACTS as same applies _ I:<:._ ach r q 'SL
for transportation. If the selected agency cannot prov ide t ransportation ,
then ACTS will provide transporta ion , provided tha senior making th
request meets ACTS ' r nsportation criteria ,
4. If ESS or another trans unabl
•
I • •
_n
-
•
•
• •
5. ESS wi ll cooper ate rn scheduling trips thru ACTS to co1T1T10n
geog raphical points in Arapahoe Coun ty. 'Ihese points include , bu t no
excluding other areas as determined by ESS and ACTS, Swedish Ho spi al, Malley
Senior Center , area grocery markets, and other areas within a 3-mi le r d1us
of Englewood.
6. ESS may place on one window an ACTS logo .
7. 1\CTS wil l receive transportation requests from othe r cooperating
agencies, call ESS and cooperate with the ESS dispatcher in scheduling AC'J'S
and other agency trips . Once a schedule is maintained , ACTS wil l contac the
o ther agencies and up--<late their scheduling.
8. ACTS and ESS mutually agree that either party may requ :; revision
or terminate this agreement after the giving of seven (7) days' wri en
no ice the other party of the party 's desire for such revisions or
termination. Ci y Council of the City of Englewood , Colorado , hereby
authorizes the Director of Public Works of the City of Englewood o te r minat
this contract should 1 be in the best interes of the City to so , noti
to be given si mul an usly, in writing, to Ci y Council via the City Cle rk .
IN WIWESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto se their hands and , 1
and day and year first above wri ten .
CITY OF F}.(;LEWX)D, aJLOAAOO
EN.LEWX)D SENIOR SURREY
By
-Eugene L o"Ts , Mayor o
Ci y of Englewood , Colo rado
Attest :
-2-
BOARD F COUNTY COl+IISSIONE "
OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY I COLO
By
•
Kenn e h E. ,loss , D1rec o
rapahoe County Tr n pot at 1 n
Servic s
I • •
-
•
ORD INANCE NO. 4 /J.
SERI ES OF 1982
BY AUTHORITY
•
• •
COUNCIL BILL NO . 44
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER NEAL
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH BOARD OF COUNTY cor+USSIONERS,
ARAPAHOE COUNTY, srATE OF COLOAADO, PROVIDING MUTUAL ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDI NG
TRANSPORTATION TO SENIORS AND HANDICAPPED SENIORS.
WHEREAS, Arapahoe County, through Arapahoe County Transportation
Se rvices, provides transportation services to seniors in Arapahoe Coun ty ;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood provides transportation services to
s eniors in the City of Englewood; and
WHEREAS, coordination of services between the County of Arapahoe and
City of Englewood ~uld reduce operating costs through efficient schedul ing ;
OOW, fflEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY WE CITY COUNCIL OF fflE CITY OF
D(;LEw:X)D, COLOAADO:
Section 1. An agreement titled "Arapahoe County Transportation Serv ices
Letter of Agreement/Coordination" is hereby approved by City Counci l , a co py
o f whi ch is attached hereto and marked Exhibit A.
Sec tion 2 . That said agreement, consisting oft~ pages, generally pr ovides
as fo llows:
a. Arapahoe County Transportation Services and the City of Eng l
mutuall y agree to coo r dinate and cooperate with ea ch ot he r i n the deliv ry of
t rans portation services to nio r s and handi c apped sen ior s who resid in
Arapahoe County.
b . Ara pahoe County Tra ns porta t ion Serv ices will ac as br ok r for 11
transpo ru3tion r equests .
Sec ion 3 . City Council of th Clty of Engl wood hereby uthoriz
si n said ag r e ment for on th Ci y of Englewood
City Cl r k-Tre su r er to tt st
Introduc , re in full , and passed on fir t re ding on th
4th day of 0c ober , l 82 .
Publi hed Bill for Or din nc on th 6th y of
r , l 82 .
R d by itle d on fi n l re ing on th 18th day of
l 82 •
•
yor to
x offic 10
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
Published by~t1 :s Ordinance No. ,"1"'21 , Series of 1982, on
t he d{)!!2_ day of ~h , 1982 .
Eugene L. Oti s , Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City
of Englewood , Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and complete copy of the Ordinance passed on
final reading and published by title as Ordinance No .~, Series
of 1982 .
Gary R. Higbee
I • •
•
• •
ARAPAHOE COUN'IY 'mANSPORTATI SERVICES
LETl'ER OF J!IGREEMENT/COORDINATI
THIS )1£;REEMENT entered into this day o[ , 19
by and for the rutual benefit of IBE BOARD OF (X)UNT'J' C0f,f,1 ISSI0 ERS Or
ARAPAHOE COUN'IY, STATE OF (X)LORAOO , ARAPAHOE C:OUN'IY 'ffiANSPORTAT ION ;ERVICl::S,
hereinafter referred to as "ACTS", and the CITY OF EN;LEWJOD, COLORAOO,
E)(;LEW'.X)D SENIOR SURREY, hereinafter referred to as "ESS".
In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained h.re1n,
ACTS and ESS agree and consent to the following items of coordina ion ~nd
coope ration, to wit:
1. 'Itiat ACTS will only provide transportation to seniors and
handicapped seniors when all other transportation agencies operating within
Arapahoe County are 1..1'\able to provide transportation to said senio r s.
2. ACTS agrees to relay all necessary demographic informat ion to ESS
bout a senior who has requested transportation.
3 . ACTS will be the liaison for other transportation agencies pcratin<J
within Arapahoe County . As such , ACTS will coordinate its transpor t tion
acti vities with other area transportation agencies to avoid dupli c a tion of
tr nsportation services within the County . Each agency's transport t1 >n
c riteria will be taken into account by ACTS as same applies to each r t
for trans rtation. If the selected agency cannot provide transport tion,
then ACTS will prov id tr nsportation, provided that senior making th
request meets ACTS' r nsportation criteria.
•
I • •
•
•
• •
5. ES S wi ll coope r ate in scheduling trips thru ACTS to co1lll10 n
geog raphi c al points in Arapahoe Cow,ty. These p,ints incl ud e , bu t •1ot
e x lud i ng othe r areas as determined by ESS and ACI'S, S ish Hospi al, Malley
Seni o r Center, area rocery markets, and other areas witn i n a 3-miie r~J1us
of Englewood.
6. ESS may place on one wi ndo w an ACTS logo .
7 . ACTS will receive transportation requests from other coope r a t i ng
agencies, call ESS and cooperate with the ESS dispatcher in schedu l inJ AC'l'S
and other agency trips . Once a schedule is maintained , ACTS wil l con tact the
other agencies and up-date their scheduling.
8. ACJ'S nd ESS mutually agree that either party may request re v isions
t o or terminate this agreement after the giving of seven (7) days ' wri ten
notice to the other party of the party 's desire for such revisions or
termination. City Council of the City of Englewood , Colorado , here by
authorizes the Director of Public Works of the City of Englewood o termin a P
this contract should it be in the best interest of the City to do so, noti ce
to be given simultaneously , in writing , to City Council via th Ci y Cle r K.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands d · als
and day and year first above written .
CITY OF EN;LE\-.a)D , COLORAOO
~LE\-.a)D SENIOR SURREY
By
Eugene I:-oTs; Mayor o
City o Engle , Colorado
Attest:
-2-
BOARD OF COUNTY
OF ARAPAHOE COUN"N,
By
Kenne h°E:-tTos s ;-'oire or
Ar pahoe Cow,ty Tr ns rta ion
Services
•
I • •
n n
~-
•
•
• •
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO.
"I C
COUNCIL BILL N0.48
INTRODUCED BY
COUNCIL MEMBER BILO
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR LIBRARY SERVICES BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AND ARAPAHOE REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT
FOR 1983.
WHEREAS, an Agreement with Arapahoe Regional Library District is
presented to City Council annually; and
WHEREAS, at the September 14, 1982 meeting, the Library Advisory
Board recommended an Agreement to be presented to City Council for
approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1. That the City of Englewood, Colorado, a municipal
corporation, shall enter into an agreement with Arapahoe Regional
Library District for the calendar year 1983 for the circulation of any
items available for circulation from the City's library facilities and
from the Arapahoe Regional Library facilities to qualifying
c ardholders of the other's library facility under the terms and
conditions as set out in the attached Agreement for Library Services,
which Agreement is i ncorporated herein by reference.
S ection 2. That the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado,
hereby authorizes the Mayor of Englewood to subscribe his name to said
Agreement for and in behalf of the City of Englewood and the Director
of F in an ce , ex officio City Cle rk -T reasurer, attest the same.
Introduced , read in full , and passed on fi r st reading on the
4th day of October , 1982 .
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 6th day of
October , 1982.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the 18th day of
October, 1982.
the
Published by title as Ordinance No.~~~-' Series of 1982 , on
day of , 1982 .
Eug ne L. Otis , Mayor
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City
of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and complete copy of the Ordinance passed on
final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1982.
Gary R. Higbee
•
0
I • •
•
•
•
• •
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. COUNCIL BILL N0.48
INTRODUCED BY
COUNCIL MEMBER SILO
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR LIBRARY SERVICES BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AND ARAPAHOE REGIONAL LIBRARY DISTRICT
FOR 1983.
WHEREAS, an Agreement with Arapahoe Regional Library District is
presented to City Council annually; and
WHEREAS, at the September 14, 1982 meeting, the Library Advisory
Board recommended an Agreement to be presented to City Council for
approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1. That the City of Englewood, Colorado, a municipal
corporation, shall enter into an agreement with Arapahoe Regional
Library District for the calendar year 1983 for the circulation of any
items available for circulation from the City's library facilities and
from the Arapahoe Regional Library facilities to qualifying
cardhold ers of the other's library facility under the terms and
conditions as set out in the attached Agreement for Library Services ,
which Agreement is incorporated herein by reference.
Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado ,
hereby authorizes the Mayor of Englewood to subscribe his name to said
Agreement for and in behalf of the City of Englewood and the Director
of Finance, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer, attest the same.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the
4th day of October , 1982.
Published s a Bill for an Ordinance on h 6th d y of
Oc ober , 1982 .
Read by title nd passed on final reading on th 18th day of
October, 1982.
Eugene L. o la , Mayor
•
I • •
-•
• •
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City
of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and complete copy of the Ordinance passed on
final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. 43 , Series
of 1982.
Gary R. Higbee
•
I • •
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 1982
-44
•
• •
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO. 49
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BILO
AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE TAX LEVY IN MILLS UPON EACH DOLLAR OF THE
ASS ESSED VALUATION OF ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY wr THIN THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, FOR THE YEAR 1983 AND ESTABLISHING A MILL LEVY
FOR THE ENGLEWOOD COLORADO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND DE-
CLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, it is t he duty of the City Counc il of the City of
Englewood, Colorado, under the Charter of sa id City and Statutes of
the State of Colorado, to make the annual levy for City purposes
for the year 1982, due and payable in 1983; and
WHEREAS, the City Council ha s duly considered the esti-
mated valuation of all of the taxable property within the City and
the needs of the City for each of said levies and has determ i ned
that the levies, as hereinafter set forth, are proper and wise.
NOW, THEREFOR E , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLOR ADO, as follows:
Section 1. That there be and hereby is levied for the year 1982 ,
due and payable as required by Statutes in the year 1983 , a tax of
6.00 mills on the dollar for the General Fund of the City of Engle-
wood, Colorado.
That the levy hereinabove set forth shall be levied upon
each dollar of the assessed valuat ion of all taxable property with-
in the corporate limits of the City of Englewood , Colorado , and the
said levy shall be certified as required by law.
Section 2 . That under the authority of Part 8, Article 25 , Title
31, of th Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, as amended, ther be
nd hereby is levied for the year 1982 , due and payable as re-
quired by 1 win 1983 , a tax of 5 .00 mills on the dollar for the
use and b nefit of the Englewood Colorado Do wntown Development Au-
thority.
That the levy her inabove st forth shall be 1 vied upon
each dollar of th ass sed valuation of all taxable property
within the Englewood Colorado Do wn town Development District, and
the s id 1 vy sh 11 be c rtifi d as required by law. I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
-2-
Section 3. That City Council finds and determines that an emer-
gency exists in that funds for municipal operations are necessary
and passage of this ordinance is necessary for the immediate pre-
servation of public property, health, peace and safety, and said
ordinance shall become effective immediately following final pas-
sage and shall be published within seven days thereof.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the
4th day of October, 1982
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 6th day of
October, 1982.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the 18th day of
October , 1982.
Published by ~~Ordinance No. 44 , Series of 1982, on
the ,&Qth day of~ , 1982.
Eugene L. Otis, Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City
of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and coaplete copy of the Ordinance passed on
final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. 44--, Series
of 1982.
Gary R. Higbee
•
I • •
ORDINANCE NO. 14
SERIES OF 1982
•
• -
BY AUTHORITY
COUNCIL BILL NO. 49
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BILO
AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE TAX LEVY IN MILLS UPON EACH DOLLAR OF THE
ASSESSED VALUATION OF ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, FOR THE YEAR 1983 AND ESTABLISHING A MILL LEVY
FOR THE ENGLEWOOD COLORADO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND DE-
CLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, it is the duty of the City Council of the City of
Englewood, Colorado, under the Charter of said City and Statutes of
the State of Colorado, to make the annual levy for City purposes
for the year 1982, due and payable in 1983; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered the esti-
mated valuation of all of the taxable property within the Cit y and
the needs of the City for each of said levies and has determ i ned
that the levies, as hereinafter set forth, are proper and wi se.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
C ITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
S e c t i on 1 . That there be and hereby i s levied for the year 1 98 2 ,
due and payable a s requ i red by Statutes in th e year 1983, a tax o f
6.00 mil l s on the dollar for th e Genera l Fund o f the Ci ty of En gl e -
wood, Colorado.
That the levy hereinabov e set f o rth s hall be lev i ed upo n
each d o l l ar o f the a sse ss ed valuation of all t a xable pr o per t y wi t h-
in t h e co rpo r ate li mits of the City of Eng le woo d, Colo ra do , and the
said levy shall be certified as r equi r ed by la w.
Section 2 . That und r the authority of Part 8 , Articl 25 , Title
31 , of the Colorado Revised Statutes , 1973 , as amended , there be
and h ereby is levied for the year 1982 , due nd payable as re-
qui r ed by la w in 1983 , a ta x of 5 .00 mills on the dollar for the
use and benefit of the Englewood Colo r a d o Do wnto wn Dev lopm nt Au-
thorit y.
That the l vy h r eina b o v set forth shall b le v i d upon
each dollar of the assessed v aluation of all ta x abl p r operty
w ithin the Englewood Colorado Do wntown De v lopm nt District , and
th said l v y shall b c rtified as required by la w •
•
I • •
-•
• •
-2-
Section 3. That City Council finds and determines that an emer-
gency exists in that funds for municipal operations are necessary
and p assage of this ordinance is necessary for the immediate pre-
servation of public property , health, peace and safety, and said
ordinance shall become effective immediately following final pas-
sage and shall be published within seven days thereof.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on f i rst reading on the
4th day of October , 1982
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 6th day of
October, 1982.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the 18th da y of
October, 1982.
~~lished by !itle as Ord i nance No.~ 1
the &O!!J. day of (!:]&D-hJ; , 1982.
Attest:
ex officio Ci ty Cl erk-Tr ea surer
, Se ri e s of 1 98 2 , on
Eugene L. Ot is , Mayo r
I , Ga ry R. Hi g bee , e x off i c i o C i t y Cl er k -T r easurer of the City
of Eng lewoo d, Colorado , h e r e by ce rtify th a t t h e a b o v e and foregoing
is a true, accurate and comp le t e c opy o f the Or dinance passed on
final reading and published by title as Ordinance No. -"'l~ , Series
of 1982.
Gary R. Higbee
I • •
•
ORDINANCE NO. 14
SERIES OF 1982
•
• •
BY AUTHORITY
7 0 ·
COUNCIL BILL NO. 49
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER BILO
AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE TAX LEVY IN MILLS UPON EACH DOLLAR OF THE
ASSESSED VALUATION OF ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, FOR THE YEAR 1983 AND ESTABLISHING A MILL LEVY
FOR THE ENGLEWOOD COLORADO DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND DE-
CLARING AN EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, it is the duty of the City Council of the City of
Englewood, Colorado, under the Charter of said City and Statutes of
the State of Colorado, to make the annual levy for City purpose s
for the year 1982, due and payable in 1983; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has duly considered the esti-
mated valuation of all of the taxable property within the City and
the needs of the City for each of sa id levies and has determined
that the levi es, as hereinafter set forth, are proper and wise.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CI TY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. That there be and hereby is levied for the year 1982 ,
due and payable as required by Statutes in the year 1983, a tax of
6.00 mills on the dollar for the General Fund of the City of Eng le-
wood, Colorado .
That the l vy hereinabove set forth shall be levied upon
each dollar of the assessed valuation of all taxable property with -
in the corporate limits of the City of Englewood, Colorado, and the
said 1 vy shall be cer ified as required by law.
Section 2. That under the authority of P rt 8 , Article 25 , Title
31, of the Colorado Revised St tuts, 1973, as amend d, th re be
and hereby is levi d for the year 1982, due nd payabl s re-
quir d by 1 win 1983, a tax of 5.00 mills on the dollar for the
use and b n fit of th Engle wo od Color do Downtown Development Au-
thority .
Th t the levy hereinabov s forth hall b levied upon
e ch doll r of the assess d valuation of all axable prop rty
within the Englewood Colorado Do wn town O velopment Dia ric , and
hes id levy sh 11 b certifi d s required by law •
)
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
-2-
Section 3. That City Council finds and determines that an emer-
gency exists i n that funds for municipal operations are necessary
and passage of this ordinance is necessary for the immediate pre-
servation of public property, health, peace and safety, and said
ordinance shall become effective immediately following final pas-
sage and shall be published within seven days thereof.
Introduc ed , read in full, and passed on first reading on the
4th day of October, 1982
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 6th day of
October, 1982.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the 18th day of
October, 1982.
#f~~lished by:::'itle as Ordinance No.::1::4::
the~ day of (l)_(!jJ.).[e,v , 1 982.
, Series of 1982, on
Eugene L. Otis, Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I , Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Cler k-Treasurer of the City
of Englewood, Colorado , hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and complete copy of the Ordinance passed on
final reading and publ ished by title as Ordinance No.::1:1-, Series
of 1982.
Gary R. Higbee
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
1
ENGLEWOOD DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
3535 S. Sherman S~<et
Englewood. COIOrodo 8(l110
Phone 3031781 • 7885
October 14, 1982
Mayor Eugene Otis
City Council
City of Englewood
3400 South Elati
Englewood, CO 80110
Dear Mayor Otis:
Please be advised that at its October 13, 1982, meeting,
The Englewood Downtown Development Authority Board passed
a resolution reconaending to the City Council, the estab-
lishment of a mill levy for the Englewood, Colorado, Down-
town Development Authority of 5.00 mills for the taxabl
year 1983.
Cletus A. Ga aaon
Chairperson
•
D
,
I • •
-
-
•
•
•
• •
7 t
BY AUTHORITY
ORDIN ANCE NO.-=-----
SERIES OF 1982
COUNCIL BILL NO. 50
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL
MEMBER ~LLJ-l:=....:==-~
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING CORPORATE OFFICERS, AGENTS, OR EMPLOYEE S
FROM VIOLATING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD BY
ADDING SECTION 5, TO CHAPTER 3, TITLE 11 OF THE EMC '69, AS
AMENDED.
WHEREAS, Certain Code violations occur for or on behalf of a
coporate entity by its officers, employees or agents, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to prohibit officers, employees, or
agents from hiding behind the "corporate veil•.
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Sec ion 1. That the '69 Englewood Municipal Code is hereby amended
by adding a Section to be numbered 11-3-5, which Section reads as
follows:
11-3-5: CRIMINAL LIABILITY OF A PERSON FOR CO RPORATE CONDUCT
An individual is criminally liable for conduct constituting
a violation of any Englewood Municipal Ordin nee which he performs
or causes to occur in the name of or in b half of a corpora ion o
the same extent as if that conduc wer e p rformed or c used by him
in his own name or beh lf.
Introduced, r d in ull, and p
day of~-----~' 1982.
don first r adin on
Published s a Bill for an Ordinanc on he
------' 1982 .
d y of
h
ugene L. ts, Mayor
ex o y C erk-Tr a ur r
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk -Treasurer of the C i ty
of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify tha t the abo ve and forego i n g
is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance ,
int roduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on t h e~~~~-
day of , 1982.
Gary R. Higb e e
•
•
I • •
n
-
ORD INANCE NO. ----SERI ES OF 1982
•
• •
BY AUTH ORIT Y
A BILL FOR
COUNCIL BILL t 'O . 50
INTROD~C_ED B: COUNCIL
MEMBER ~
AN ORDIN ANCE PROHIBITING CO RP ORA TE OFFICERS, AGENTS, OR EMP LOYEES
FROM VIOL ATING THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEW OOD BY
ADDING SEC T IO N 5, TO CHAPTER 3, TITLE 11 OF THE EMC '69, AS
AMENDED.
WHEREAS, Certain Code violations occur for or on behalf of a
copo rate entity by its officers , employees or agents, and
WHERE AS, it is necessary to prohibit officers, employees, or
agents from hiding behind the "corporate veil".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY CO UN CIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Sectio n 1 . That the '69 Englewood Mun ici pa l Code is hereby men ed
by adding a Section to be numbered 11-3-5 , which Section reads as
follo ws:
11-3-5 : CRIMINAL LI AB ILITY OF A PERSON FOR COR PORATE CO NDU CT
An individual is c riminally liable for conduc const1tu ing
a violation of any Englewood Municipa l Ordina n ce whi ch he performs
or causes to occur in the name of or in behalf of a corporation o
th same extent as if hat conduct w re performed or c us d by him
in his o wn name orb half.
'-tJi Introduce full, nd pas ed on first re ding on h ..h day of , 1982.
d s Bill for n Ordin nc on th d.00_ a y 0 , l a,.
ne-C. O s, May or
ex rk-Treasu~
I • •
In
-
•
•
•
• •
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk -Treasurer of the City
of Engle wood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true , accurate and complete copy of a Bill fo r an Ordinance,
intr oduced, read in full, and passed on fi r st reading on t he~~--~
day of , 1982.
Gary R . Higb ee
I • •
-
•
•
• -
7 F
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 198~2~~~
COUNCIL BILL NO. 54
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIC-
A BILL FOR MEMBER :j;, ~t4 1Jic.h
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, The City of Englewood has received from the Regiona l
Transportation District funds for transit related improvements;
and
WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into an agreement to
accomplish the improvements:
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of the City
of Englewood as follows:
Section 1. An Agreement titled "Regional Transportation District
Transit Street Improvement Agreement• attached hereto and marked
"Exhibit A", is hereby approved by the City Council of the City of
Englewood, Colorado and the Mayor of the City of Englewood is
authorized sign, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest the
Agreement.
Section 2. The Agreement generally provides as follows:
(a) The project consists of 2 radius modifications
located at the s.w. corner of Broadway at Floyd and
S.W. corner of Dartmouth at Cherokee, two bus pads
located on Broadway, South of Dartmouth and on the
east side of Broadway, north of Floyd Avenue.
(b) R.T.D. s ha ll pay to the City of Englewood up to
$17 ,5 0 0 fo r the p r oject .
(c) The City shall oversee and insu r e the co mp letion
of the project .
~lhlntroduced full , and passed on first r eading on the lo day of__u~:!,.:!::~~-· 1982 .
c;}L~ i shed as i;/ , 19 8 2 .
Bill for an Ordinance on the df2 tA day of
Eugene L . Otis , Mayor
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
• •
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex of ficio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City
of Englewood, Colorado, hereby ce rtify that the abo ve and foregoing
is a true, accurate and com plet e copy of a Bill for an Ordinance,
introduSnd, read in full, and passed on first reading on the J/;t;!)
day of (!,L~ , 1982. '
Gary R. Higbee
-2-
I • •
n
-
•
•
• •
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
TRANSIT STREET IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT
.L .
AGREEMENT made this* day of* , 1982, by
and between the City of Englewood, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee," and
the REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the
State of Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "RTD."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the RTD has established a Transit Street Improvement fund
for the purpose of implementing transit-related street improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Grantee has filed an application for funding of certain improve-
ments and the RTD has approved the use of RTD local funds for the Project described
in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to implement capital improvements
described herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in c onsideration of the mutual promises c ontained
herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the rec eipt and sufficienc y
of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
SECTION ONE
PURPOSE
The purpose of th is Agree ment is to assist the Grantee in im pl ement ing
the transit-r lated stree t i mprovement(s) desc ribed below (hereinafter sometimes
referred to as "the Project"). The Grantee, in turn, will carry out the Project
in a ccordanc e wit h the t e r ms of this Agreement.
SE C TION TWO
TH E PROJ EC T
The P roject consists of 2 radius modifications located at t h . W. corner
of Bro d w y a t Floyd and • W. corner of Dartmouth at Cherokee. Two bus pads
located on Broadway outh of D rtmouth and on the e s t side of Bro dw y, North
of Floyd Avenue, s more p rticul rly d cribed in Exhibit A tt ch d hereto.
ECTI N T HREE
T H E G R ANT
The RTD will prov1d th Gr nt e th tot I cost of the proJect or Sevente n
Thouaand, Five Hundr ed Dollars ($17 ,)00.00) vh i ch ver is leas.
•
3
I • •
•
•
• •
a. Where the Grantee performs the Project work through its own work
force, the RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of invoices received
and approved by the RTD for time and materials expended.
b. Where the Grantee performs the Project work through a contractor,
the RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of the contract award
price (as may be modified by change orders) all ap proved by the R TD.
c. Where the Project work is part of a larger capital improvement, the
RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of the unit prices bid as part
of such larger contract and RTD approval of all costs including items wh ich
may not be identified in the larger contract.
SECTION FOUR
ELIGIBLE COSTS
Costs eligible for reimbursement by the RTD under this grant Agreement
are limited to the actual cost of design and construction of the approved Project.
SECTION FIVE
GRANTEE REQUIREMENTS
a. The Grantee will prepare any ne c essary right-of-way or other real
property acquisition instruments for the Project, if any.
b. The Grantee will provide design doc ument review, construction inspe c-
tion, and engineering services for the Project.
c. The Grantee will obtain any required appraisals, permits, and approvals
and will be responsible for all cit iz en review and public agency coordination,
if any.
d. The Grantee will maintain the com pleted Projec t.
e. The Grantee will cons tr uct the Projec t through i ts own work force
or cause it to be constructed through formally advertised, free, open, and competi-
tive bidding, and in accordance with such add itional terms and conditions as the
RTD may require.
f. The Grantee shall permit and shall require st contractors to permit
the RTD to inspect all data and records with regard to th Project. The RTD
also may require the Grantee to furnish at ny ttme prior to closeout of the ProJect,
audit reports pr pared according to gener lly accepted ccounti ng pr inci pl s.
g. To the extent the work to be perform d under this Agreement is per-
formed by other than the employees of the rantee or other Gov rnmental entity
and the tot I cost of uch work is in excess of FIVE TH A D DOLLARS ($5,000.00)
the Proj t Labor Agre ment in orpor ted her in b reference sh II pply.
h. Reimbur ement by RTD for ehg1ble-co t I expressly c ontingent
upon completion of th work to be performed und r th1 greement on or b fore
D em~ I, 19 2. r ntee shall obt an th RT ' rm Im pection nd wrstt n
con urrence in t ccept nee of th completed proJ c t amprovem nt on or before
Decem~ 31, 19 2 •
•
I • •
•
•
• •
SECTION SIX
DESIGN APPROVAL
The Grantee shall obtain the RTD's written approval of the Grantee's use
of and fees for outside consultants' preparation of plans, specifications, and esti-
mates; the Grantee's bid process for the improvements constructed as part of
this Project prior to the approval of the bid of any bidder; and cost estimates
of right of way or other real property acquisition --all prior to commencement
of acquisition or construction. As part of this approval process, the RTD shall
have the right to inspect any bid documents submitted and the right of approval
of the lowest responsible bidder(s).
SECTION SEVEN
CONTINUING TRANSPORTATION USE
In consideration for this Grant, the Grantee shall permit the RTD free use
of the improvements funded hereunder for transportation purposes for a period
of not less than five (5) years from the date said improvements are completed
and made available for public use. In the event the Grantee interrupts, eliminates,
or interferes with the RTD's use of said improvements, the Grantee shall immediately
refund to the RTD the full amount of the Grant funds received hereunder, pro-
rated over the five-year period.
SECTION EIGHT
FINAL INSPECTION
The Grantee shall obtain the RTD's final inspection and written concurrence
in the acceptance of completed Project improvements.
The RTD, upon granting f ina l acceptance, and within th ir ty (30) days thereafter,
wi ll pay the amounts specified in Section Three above, in conformance with the
conditions stated there in.
ECTIO I E
HOLD HAR MLE S -RTD OT LIABLE
Gran · e, agrees to save and hold the RTD harmless from and against all
suits, claims, and demands based upon any alleged d mage to property or any
alleged injury to persons (including de th) which may occur or be alleged to have
occurred by or on account of ny negligent act or omission on the part of the
said Grantee, its subcontractors, or ny of th 1r serv nt , employees, or gents.
The Grantee, at its own expen e, will settle or defend any cl ims or litigation
rising out of the perform nee of this Agreement.
Th RTD sh II not be Ii ble for ny dam ge to th Project improvement
through the rout in use th r of uni caus d olely by th negligence nd/or
omis ton of RTD employees.
•
I • •
•
• -
SECTION TEN
TERMIN ATION
Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving written
notice s pecifying the date of termination, such noti c e to be given not less than
ninety (90) days prior to the date therein s pecified. In the event the Grantee
desires to cance l th is Agreement after RTD has expended funds for design, bu t
before construction has begun, Grantee shall reimburse the RTD [or a ll design
funds ex pended by RTD. In the event the Grantee desires to canc el thi s Agreement
after Project c onstruction during the initial five (5) year period, it may do so
upon giving written notice to the RTD, specifying the date of termination, such
notice to be g iven not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date t herein spec ified.
As a con dition prec edent to terminat ion a fter Project c onstruction, the Grantee
shall reimburse the RTD for all Grant funds received under this Agreement, pro-
ra ted over said five-year period.
SECTION ELEVEN
PROHIBITED INT ERESTS
No officer, member, or employee of the RTD, and no members of it s governing
body, and no other publi c offici al or employee of the go vern ing body of the loc al i t y
or local ities included within the District, during his or her tenure or for one ye ar
the rafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirec t, in this Agreement, or the
proc eeds thereof.
SECTION TWELVE
MISCELLANEO U
I. Noti ce s . An y not ice to be given hereund r shall be de e med g ive n
when sent by regi s tered o r c ertified ma il to the addresses belo w:
RTD
Departm nt o f Le ga l C ounsel
16 0 0 Bl ak e tre t
Denve r, Colorado 80202
Grantee:
City o f Eng lewood
34 00 ou t h E l t1 t r eet
Englewood, C 801 10
2. e ve r a bil1ty . hould any prov1s1on of t his agr eeme nt bed dar ed
invalid by any cour t of c-ompetent 1urisd1 c t1o n, t h remaining pro I ions her o f
s ha ll remain in full for nd effect regardle s of su h declaration.
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
4. Agreement Binding. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of
and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
5. Laws to 22Q!y. The Project shall be carried out in accordance with
the laws of the Sta te of Colorado and all applicable Federal laws & regulations,
and all local laws , ordinances and regulations.
6. Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended except in writing
by mutual agreement of the parties, nor may rights be waived except by an instru-
ment in writing signed by the party charged with such waiver.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement ,
effective the day and date first above written.
.-\PPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
FOR THE RTD
By _____ ...,..._=----,----
Legal Counsel
ATTEST:
By ___________ _
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
By=----,--.,,...,.-----,-~---,-,-,,---
Executi ve Direc tor and General Manager
GRANTEE: City of Englewood
3400 South Elatl Street
Englewood, CO 80110
By ______________ _
I • •
• -
• •
0
S.W. Cor. Broadway a Floyd
-W. Floyd Ave. -
V.C.8G.
r--10.0' • 1 • 17.9° ---
8.3'
SCALE '. 111 = 10 1
143·--
• ENGINEERING DEPART MENT
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO •
RECONSTRUCTION for R.T. O.
Drawn By : oat.: July, 1982
• •
-
•
•
' .
•
• •
ESTIMATED COSTS
S. W. Corner Broadway & Floyd
Remove & replace 26 L.F. VC&G@ $13.50/L.F.
Remove & replace 175 L.F. 8" walk @ $5.20/S.F.
Saw concrete -25.7 L.F.@ $2.20/L.F.
Remove 66 S.F. Crosspan@ $0.70/S.F.
ratch asphalt -3.5 T@ $50/Ton
PX/lo
9/22/82
Subtotal
+ lO\ Contingency
Total
•
$ 35l. 00
910.00
57.00
46.00
175.00
$1,539.00
1 54 .00
Sl,693 .00
I r:t
I • •
• -
• •
0
S.W. COR. DARTMOUTH a CHEROKEE
S. CHEROKEE ST.
//,p,op.rty Lin,
L _ ----
SCALE : 1·= lo' 9 Z •
ENGINE RING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF £NGL£WOOO, COLORADO •
RECONSTRUCTION for R.T.O.
E] -Replace Concrete
Orawn By : P.K Oat•: S•pf. 1982
• •
-
, ' .. ..
•
•
• •
ESTIMATED COSTS
S. W. Corner Dartmouth & Cherokee
Remove 46.2 L.F. VC&G@ $2.00/L.F.
Replace 43.3 L.F. VC&G@ $11.50/L.F.
Remove 241.1 S.F. Walk@ $0.70/S.F.
Replace 141. 4 S. F. 8" Walk @ $4. 50/S. F.
Replace 48.0 S.F. 4" Wa.lJc@ $2.00/S.F.
Remove one catch basin@ $600/Ea.
Construct one catch basin@ $1,200.00/Ea.
Place 12 L.F. 15" RCP@ $31.00/L.F.
Patch asphalt -6 T.@ $50/T.
PIC/lo
9/22/82
Subtotal
+ 10\ Contingency
Total
•
$ 9 2 .0 0
4 9 8.00
1 69 .0 0
636.0 0
96.00
600 .00
1,200 .0 0
372 . 0 0
300 .00
$3,963.00
396.00
$4,3 5 9.00
I • •
•
• •
0
R.T D. BUS PAD
SCALE '. I"= 10·~ ._ t
------Broodwoy --~-
1----------53.6'---+-:::::::;::=====-~-----oooo ---50--rr---------======:J
Construct 8 1 X651 Cone . Bus Pad
(SH Pod 0.foil &low)
ad
ENGI N E OE MR TM NT
CITY OF ENGLEWOOO
RTQ Bus Pad
3100 8/k S Broadway
Dro wn By .
•
•
•
•
• •
ESTIMATED COSTS
Pad at S. W. Corner Broadway & Dartmouth
Remove & Replace 100 L.F. VC&G@ $1 1 .50/L .F.
Remove 602 S.F. Asphalt@ $1.00/S.F.
Construct 520 S.F. 8" pan/mesh @ $4.50/S.F.
Patch asphalt -4 T.@ $50/T.
P!Vlo
q/22/82
Subtotal
+ 10\ Contingency
Total
•
$1,1 50 .00
602.00
2,340.00
200.00
$4,292.00
429.00
$4,721.00
I • •
I
•
• •
RID. BUS PAD
E. Side Broadway, N. of Floyd Ave .
Remove a Replace 18 0 S.F. 4" Wolk,
Sow 190 L .F. Cone .
0
SCALE : 111 = 101
----lI1
Exis ting Glass ~
Shackby RT.o. ~-
Re place 5IJ° Section, 9" Wide Chose
Drain Cover
. i-1.0'-i
Construct 8 1 X 65' Cone . Bus Pad
I See Pod Oeloi l Below J
F <1sl1ng
°kf•plloM
M/1111101-
t---------------650'---------------' t-----------------~0-------------------~
••
•
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
RrD. BUS PAO
3200 8 /k. S. Bro adway
Drawn By: Oat• · July, 1982
•
-
•
•
•
. .
ESTIMATED COSTS
•
• •
Pad at N. E. Corner Broadway & Floyd
Remove & replace 90 L.F. VC&G@ $11.50/L.F.
Remove & replace 18 S.F. Walk@ $2.70/5.F.
Saw Concrete -20.5 L.F.@ $2.20/L.F.
Remove 602 S.F. Asphalt@ $1.00/S.F.
Construct 520 S.F. 8" pan/mesh@ $4.50/S.F.
Chase section work -lump sum@
Patch asphalt -4 T.@ $50/T.
P,Vlo
9/22/82
Subtotal
+ 10\ Contingency
Total
•
$1,035.00
49.0 0
45.00
602.00
2,340.00
500.00
200.00
$4,770.00
477.00
$5,247.00
n
I • •
-
•
•
C O U N C I L
DATE October 13, 1982
•
• •
C O M M U N I C A T I O N
AGENDA ITEM
1
REGIONAL TRANSPORATION DISTRI CT
SUBJECT TRANSIT STREET IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT
INITIATED BY City Manager
ACTION PROPOSED Pass ordinance aythori zi na execyti on of the agreement
BACKGROUND :
Each year, the City of Englewood requests fund i ng from RTD to repair concrete that
has been da,naged by the i r buses at various locations throughout the City . Thi s year,
RTD has approved work at the follow i ng locations :
1) Floyd & Broadway (s outhwest corner)~ curb rad i us repa i r s
2) Cherokee & Dartmouth (southwest corne r) ~ curb r adi us repa i rs
3) Broadway & Dartmout h (southwe st cor ner ) ~ co ncrete repa irs an d construction
of a concrete bus pad
4) Broadway and Floyd (no rtheas t co rner )~ co ncrete r epa irs a nd co nstru ct ion o f a
concrete bus pad
FINAN CIAL :
RTO ha s co11111i tted for th e actual costs of th e proposed work, t o maximum of $17,500.
REC Oftil ENDA TI ON :
We uld reco nd tha th agre nt b execu d so t at th proposed improv nts
could yet be completed 1n 1982 .
RA /ld o
I . •
ORDIN ANCE NO.~~~-
SERIES OF 1982
•
• •
BY AUTHORITY
A BILL FOR
COUNCIL BILL NO. 5 4
INTROD~CWJ BY COUN~IC:-
MEMBER~
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION
DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, The City of Englewood has received from the Regiona l
Transportation District funds for transit related improvements;
and
WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into an agreement to
accomplish the improvements:
NOW, THEREFORE, be it ordained by the City Council of the City
of Englewood as follows:
Section 1. An Agreement titled "Regional Transportation District
Transit Street Improvement Agreement• attached hereto and marked
"Exhibit A", is hereby approved by the City Council of the City of
Engle wood, Colorado and the Mayor of the City of Englewood is
authorized sign, and the City Clerk is authorized to attest the
Agreement.
Section 2 . The Agr eement ge n erall y provides as follows:
(a) The project consists of 2 rad ius modific at ions
located at the S .W. corn er of Broadway at Floyd and
S .W. corner of Dartmouth at Cherokee , t wo bus pads
located on Broadway, South of Da r tmouth and on the
east side of Broadway, north of Floyd Avenue.
(b) R.T.D. shall pay to the City of Englewood up to
$17,500 for the project .
(c) The City shall overs
of the project.
nd insur th completion
; Introduced• read in full, and passed on first reading on th
'-ti) day of , , 1982.
h d as a Bill or an Ordinance on the
~.,C,j~~~~, 19 2 .
.lioO.""-~-day of
Eugene L. o la, ayor
I • •
n
-
•
•
•
• •
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City
of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, L
introduc:'d , read in full, and passed on first reading on the /f.-:t_ri
day of LJ(Jb-J-e, , 1982.
Gary R. Higbee
-2-
I • •
-
•
•
• •
REGION AL TRANSPORTATIO DISTRI C T
TRANSIT STREET IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT
j__
AGREEMENT made this * day of * , I 982, by
and between the City of Englewood, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee," and
the REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the
Sta te of Colorado, hereinafter referred to as "RTD."
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the RTD ha s establi s hed a Transit Street Im provement fun d
for the purpose of implementin g transi t-rela ted str eet improvements ; and
WHEREAS, the Grantee has filed an appli c at ion for funding of certain improve-
ments and the RTD has approved the use of RTD local funds for the Projec t desc ribed
in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto desi re to implement c api tal improvements
described herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual prom ises contained
herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the rec eipt and suffici ency
of whi ch are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:
SECTION ONE
PURPOSE
The pu rpose of th is Agreement is to a ssist the G rantee in impl e ment in g
the t r an sit-r Pl ated street i mprovement(s) desc ribe d below (hereinafter some t imes
referred to as "the Proj ec t"). The Grantee, in t urn, w ill c arr y out the Project
in accordance with the t e r ms o f t hi s Agree ment.
SE C TI O N TW O
THE PROJECT
The ProJect consists of 2 r dius modifications locat d at the S. W. corner
of Bro d y t Floyd and • W. corner of Dartmouth at Ch rokee. Two bus pads
loc ted on Bro dway outh of D rtmouth nd on the e stside of Bro dway, orth
of Floyd Avenue, as more parucul rly d cribed in Exh1b1t A attached hereto.
SECTI THREE
THE GRANT
Th RTD will prov1d th Gr nt the total ost of the project or Sev nu n
Thou1and, Fiv Hundr ed Dollars ($17 ,)00.00) whi ch v r ia 1•••·
3
I • •
•
• -
a. Where the Grantee performs the Project work through its own work
force, the RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of invoices received
and approved by the RTD for time and materials expended.
b. Where the Grantee performs the Project work through a contractor,
the RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of the contract award
price (as may be modified by change orders) all approved by the R TD.
c. Where the Project work is part of a larger capital improvement, the
RTD will provide the Grant funds on the basis of the unit prices bid as part
of such larger contract and RTD approval of all costs including items which
may not be identified in the larger contract.
SECTION FOUR
ELIGIBLE COSTS
Costs eligible for reimbursement by the RTD under this grant Agreement
are limited to the actual cost of design and construction of the approved Projec t.
SECTION FIVE
GRANTEE REQUIREMENTS
a. The Grantee will pre pare any ne c essary r ight-of-way or other real
property acquisition instruments for the Project, if any.
b. The Grantee will provide design document review, construc t ion inspec -
tion, and engineering services for the Project.
c. The Grantee will obtain any required appra is al s , per mi ts, and a ppro val s
and will be responsible for all c1 t1zen review and public agenc y coordmauon,
if any.
d. The Grantee will m in ta in t he complet ed Proj t .
e. The Gra nt e will cons truc t t he Pro1 t t hrough i t s own work for c <.-
or cau e It to be cons t ru t ed through formally advert! e d, fre , open, and com pett -
t 1ve bidd ing, n d in accord nee w it h uch addition l e r m nd nd1t1on
RTD may require .
t ,
•
I .
J
•
• -
SECTION SIX
DESIGN APPROVAL
The Grantee shall obtain the RTD's written approval of the Grantee's use
of and fees for outside consultants' preparation of plans, specifications, and esti-
mates; the Grantee's bid process for the improvements constructed as part of
this Project prior to the approval of the bid of any bidder; and cost estimates
of right of way or other real property acquisition --all prior to commencement
of acquisition or construction. As part of this approval process, the RTD shall
have the right to inspect any bid documents submitted and the right of approval
of the lowest responsible bidder{s).
SECTION SEVEN
CONTINUING TRANSPORTATION USE
In consideration for this Grant, the Grantee shall permit the RTD free use
of the improvements funded hereunder for transportation purposes for a period
of not Jess than five (5) years from the date said improvements are completed
and made available for public use. In the event the Grantee interrupts, eliminates,
or interferes with the RTD's use of said improvements, the Grantee shall immed ia tely
refund to the RTD the full amount of the Grant funds received hereunder, pro-
rated over the five-year period.
SECTION EIGHT
FINAL INSPECTION
The Grantee shall obtain the RTD's final inspection and written concurrence
in the acceptance of completed Project improvements.
The RTD, upon grant ing final acceptance, and within thirty (30) days there after,
will pay the amounts specified in Sec tion Three above, in c onformance wi th the
conditions stated t he re in.
ECTIO I E
HOLD HARMLE S -RTD OT LIABLE
Gran , agre s to save nd hold the RTO harmle s from and against II
u1t , claims, and demand b sed upon any alleged d m ge to property or ny
lie ed inJury to person {including de th) which m y occur or be alleg d to h ve
occurred by or on account of ny negligent ct or om1s ,on on the p rt of th
id Grantee, its su ontr ctor , or ny of their ervant , employees, or g nt
Th Gr ntee, t Its own e pense, ill ettle or d fend ny cl im or litig uon
ari in out of th perform nee of this Agreement.
Th RTD h II not be h bl for ny d m g to th Proiect 1mpro m nt
through the routine use th reof uni s caused ol ly by th neglig n nd/or
om1 ion of TO employ
•
I • •
•
• -
SECTION TEN
TERMINATION
Either party may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving written
not ice specifying the date of termination, such noti ce to be given not less than
ninety (90) days prior to the date therein specified. In the event the Grantee
desires to cancel th is Agreement after RTD has expended funds for design, but
before construction has begun, Grantee shall reimburse the RTD for all des ign
funds expended by RTD. In the event the Grantee desi res to cancel this Agree me nt
after Project construction during the initial five (5) year period, it may do so
upon giving written notice to the RTD, specifying the date of term i nation, such
notice to be given not less than ninety (90) days prior to the date therein speci fied.
As a con dition precedent to termination after Project construction, the Grantee
shall reimburse the RTD for all Grant funds received under this Agreement, pro-
rated over said five -year per iod.
SECTIO ELEVEN
PROHIBITED INTERESTS
No officer, member, or employee of the RTD, and no members of its govern ing
b ody, and no other public official or employee of the governing body of the loc al ity
o r localiti e s included within the Distric t, dur ing his or her tenure or for one year
t heraf ter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, or the
proceeds thereof.
ECTIO TWELVE
MISCELLANEOU
I. Notices . Any notice t o be given hereunder shall bed emed given
when sent by register e d or certified mail to the addresses bel ow :
RTD
Department of Legal Counsel
1600 Blake tre t
Denver, Colorado 80202
Grantee:
City of Englewood
)400 outh Elati treet
Englewood, CO 8011 0
2. everabtlity . hould any provision of this agreement b de lared
invalid by any cou rt of compe tent 1unsdict1on, the rem ming prov1 i ns hereof
hall remain in full for nd effect regard! ss of such d claration.
). Equal I:mployment pportunity. In conn ct1on with th perform n e
of th1 Agreem nt, the Grantee shall not dt c nmin te gain t ny employee or
pp It cant for employment b au e of race, color, rehgion, x, n t ional origin,
ge, manta! status, being h ndicapped, a disadvant ged p rson, or disabled
or Viet am era veteran. The Grantee shall take affirm u e ctton to insure
th t applicants re employed, and that employees are treated during employm nt
without reg rd to their race, color, religion, sex, n t1on I origin, ge, m r1t I
t tu , b mg h nd1capp d, di dv ntaged p rson, or d1 bled or Viet m
r veter n. h uon hall inc lud e, but not b hm1ted to, the following:
employm nt, upgr ding, d motion, o r tran fer; recruitment or recruitment dver -
11 mg; I yoff or t rm1n tton; r t of p y or o th r forms of compens tion; nd
I c tion for tr mm , m ludm pprenuce hip.
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
4. Agreement Binding. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of
and be binding upon the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
5. Laws to~-The Project shall be carried out in accordance with
the laws of the Sta te of Colorado and all applicable Federal laws & regulations,
and all local laws, ordinances and regulations.
6. Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended except in writing
by mutual agreement of the parties, nor may rights be waived except by an instru-
ment in writing signed by the party charged with such waiver.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement,
effective the day and date first above written.
. PPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
FOR THE RTD
By----,---,-,,,----,.---
Legal Counsel
ATTEST:
By ____________ _
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT
By=---,--=-,-----,-..,,,----,-:-:,---
Executive Director and General Manager
GRANTEE: City of Englewood
3400 South Elati Street
Englewood, CO 80110
By---------------~
•
I • •
-
V.C.&G .
•
• •
0
--------------------------,"I
S.W. Cor. BroodwoY. a FloY.d
-W. Floyd Ave. -
rio.o' •j • ---11.9' ----t
8.3'
Ill'
t
V.£LUL.t.~~m-;-&
~
___ ,,.,. __
IOd~
~
Ql
<,j
l
SCALE : , ... 101
E IHE RING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
RECONSTRUCTION lor R.T. O.
Chm ,' ,Ally, 1982
•
-
•
•
•
. •
•
• •
ESTIMATED COSTS
S. W. Corner Broadway & Floyd
Remove & replace 26 L.F. VC&G@ $13.50/L.F.
Remove & replace 175 L.F. 8 " walk @ $5.20/S.F.
Saw concrete -25.7 L.F. @ $2.20/L.F.
Remove 66 S.F. Crosspan@ $0.70/S.F.
Patch asphalt -3.5 T@ $SO/Ton
PJ(/lo
9/22/82
Subtotal
+ 10\ Contingency
Total
$ 351. 00
910.00
57.00
46.00
175.00
$1,53 9 .0 0
154.00
$1,693.00
n
I • •
•
• •
0
S.W. COR . DARTMOUTH a CHEROKEE
S. CHEROKEE ST.
/l,~,ty Lin,
----------.L -----
SCALE : 1•• 10' W z,
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CtrY OF E:NGLEWOOO, COWRAOO •
RECONSTRUCTION for R.T.O.
D -Replace Concrete
Orawn 8y ' PK Oaf•. $•pt 1982
•
~-
•
, ' . ..
•
•
• •
ESTIMATED COSTS
S. W. Corner Dartmouth & Cherokee
Remove 46.2 L.F. VC&G@ $2.00/L.F.
Replace 43.3 L.F. VC&G@ $11.50/L.F.
Remove 241.1 S.F. Walk@ $0.70/S.F.
Replace 141. 4 S. F. 8" Walk @ $4 . 50/S. F.
Replace 48.0 S.F. 4" Walk @ $2.00/S.F.
Remove one catch basin@ $600/Ea.
Construct one catch basin@ $1,200.00/Ea.
Place 12 L.F. 15" RCP @ $31.00/L.F.
Patch asphalt -6 T. @ $50/T.
PK/lo
9/22/82
Subtotal
+ 10\ Contingency
Total
$ 92.00
498.00
169.00
636.00
96.00
600.00
1,200 .00
372. 00
300.00
$3,963.00
396. 00
$4,359.00
I • •
fl __ --
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~ ~
•
• -
0
RT D. BUS PAD
SCALE: I"= 10·~ ... I
~~~-Broadway -~~-r-----------~-----iooo·-----
i------------53.6'----t------+----------_:_:_::_ 65 0~----------~ ,r------------===1
5,0'
74'
ad Construct 8 1 X 651 Cone . Bus Pad
(SH Pod Oeloll &low)
~ -E1i sling CtJnc. Woll"--
>'--~---zo.d•------1
ENGINEER DEPARTMENT
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
RTQ Bus Pod
3100 8/k S. Broadway
. ;---------------•
•
.... . .
•
• -
ESTIMATED COSTS
Pad at s. W. Corner Broadway & Dartmouth
Remove & Replace 100 L.F. VC&G@ $11.50/L.F.
Remove 602 S.F. Asphalt@ $1.00/S.F.
Construct 520 S.F . 8" pan/mesh@ $4.50/S.F.
Patch asphalt -4 T.@ $50/T.
PK./lo
/22/82
Subtotal
+ 10, Contingency
Total
•
$1,1 50 .00
602.00
2 ,34 0.00
200.00
$4,292.00
429.00
$4,721.00
I • •
-
C
I ..
•
• •
RID. BUS PAD
E. Side Broadway, N. of Floyd Ave .
Remove 8 Replace 18 0 S.F 4 ° Walk
So" 19.0 LF Cone:. '
SCALE : 111= 10' -----1~,
Exislln9 Glass ~
Shack by RTO. B St · us op
Chose
,1:0·-,
Construct 8 1 X 651 Cone . Bus Pad
( SH Pad O.fai/ Below)
t-------------~o·-------------..l ,_____ ~o·-------------
•• · ---'ixTioiK>J --:-
Wirt Mesh •• ·• •
•
E ERING OEl'AIITMENT
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
R.rD. BUS PAO
3200 8/k. S. Broadway
•
-
•
•
•
• •
ESTIMATED COSTS
Pad at N. E. Corner Broadway & Floyd
Remove & replace 90 L.F. VC&G@ $11.50/L.F.
Remove & replace 18 S.F. Walk@ $2.70/S.F.
Saw Concrete -20.5 L.F. @ $2.20/L.F.
Remove 602 S.F. Asphalt@ $1.00/S.F.
Construct 520 S.F. 8" pan/mesh@ $4.50/S.F.
Chase section work -lump sum@
P atch asphalt -4 T.@ $50/T.
PX/lo
9/22/82
Subtotal
+ 10, Contingency
Total
•
$1,035.00
49.0 0
45.00
602.00
2,340.00
500 .00
200.0 0
$4,770.00
477. 00
$5,247.00
•
I • •
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 198~2~~~
•
• •
BY AUTH ORITY
A BILL FOR
COU NC IL BILL NO. 51
INT RODUC·D BY COUNCIL -
MEMBER._,,~'~~~:::!:,~~~-
AN ORDIN AN CE AMENDING SUBSECTION (3) OF SUBSECTION (A ) OF SECTION
2, CHAPTER 6, TITLE XIII OF THE '69 ENG LE WOOD MUNICIPAL CODE, AS
MENDED, BY CH ANG I NG REFERENCE TO COLORAD O STATE LAW.
WH EREAS, The Colorado Revised Statutes have been am ended, and
WHEREAS, the re is a reference to the Colorado Revised S t atutes
in City Code at 13-6-3(a),
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subsection (3) of Subsection (a) of Section 2, Chapter
6 , Title XI II of the official code of Englewood is hereby amended
to rea d as follows :
(3) Share certificates for savings accounts
in any state or federally chartered savings and
loan association in Colorado; provided, ho wever,
that said association is a member of the Federal
Sa vings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC );
and, further, that the full amount of each acc ount
is insured by the said FSLIC; and, furth e r, hat
the full amount of each acco unt is insu red by the
said FSLI C and in any time certificate of deposit
or savings account in any state o r national bank
in Colo rad o in which ce r tificates of deposit or
savings accounts are fully insured by he Federal
Oeposi ' Insur nee Corporation or cured by
collater 1 curlt1 s authorized by -i--i t
Q5• e-Y 4-d 7-, COLORADO LAW, as
amended, whose pr v lue ls at leas on hundred
perc nt (100) of the d posi h ld by ny b nk in
h St te of Colorado in th nam of th City of
Englewood .
lntroduc d, read in full, and p ssed on first r ading on h
~~~~day o , 1982 •
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
Published as a Bil for an Or dinance on the
-----~' 19 82.
day of
Attest:
Eugene L. Otis, May or
ex officio City Clerk-Treasu rer
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the City
of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certify that the above and foreg oing
is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance,
introduced , read in full, and passed on first read ing on the
day of , 1982 . ----
Gary R. Higbee
•
I • •
•
• -
BY AUTHOR ITY
ORD INANCE NO .
SERI ES OF 1 8-2~-cou ru .,~~ •o.
I, TR )DU ~§;D Bi . UNC:.:
A BILL FOR
MEMBE.~
A ORDIN AN CE AMEND I NG SU BS ECTION ( 3) OF SUBS ECTION (A) OF SECTION
2, CHAPTER , TITL E XII I OF THE '6 9 ENGLE WOO D MUNICI PA L CODE , AS
AMENDED , BY CHANG I NG REFEREN CE TO COLO RADO ST A E LAW.
WHEREAS , Th e Color a do Rev is e d Statutes ha v e been a me ~de d, and
WH EREA S , the re is a r efe ren ce to the Co lorado Revised ~tatutes
in City Code a t 13 -6-3 (a),
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT Y
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORAD O, AS FOLLOWS:
Sect io n 1. Subsection (3) of Su bse ction (a) of Sec ti on 2 , Chap er
6 , Titl e XIII of the official code of Englewo o d is her eby amended
to read as follo ws:
/2 ti, I
(3) Share c ertificates for savings ac cou n ts
i n any state or federally c h arte r ed s a vin sand
lo an associat i on in Colo rad o ; pr ovi ded, ho wever ,
t ha said asso ci a tion is a mem be r of th Fed~r
Savings and Loan I nsur anc e Co rpor a ti o n (FSLI :);
a nd, furth e r, that the full a mo unt of each a c· unt
is in s ur e d by h sa id FSLIC; and , f ur her , ha
th e f ull amo unt of each a coun is insured by th~
sai d FSLIC and in any time ce r ifi c ate of d post
or s a vi ng s account in any s t or n a ional bank
in Colorado i n whic h cer i i a s of deposi o r
avings accounts ar fully insured by the Feder l
Deposi ' Insurance Corpora ion or ccur d by
co 1 er l securiti s authorized by -t--t
Q ~ QQ-v •-~ 7 -COLO RADO LAW,
mend d , whose par v lue is s one hundr d
percent (100 ) o the deposi 1 by ny nk in
the St t ot Colorado in th name of th Ci yo
Eng le ood.
din full, and p ssed on first r adtng on h
~-' l 2 .
•
I • •
•
• •
ub lished as Bi £2~ , 1 982.
fo r an Ordin an ce on the o-U-. cay of
A test: Eugene L. otrs;-Mayor
ex officio Ci ty Clerk-Treasurer
I, Gary R. Higbee, ex officio City Clerk-Treas urer of the City
of Englewood, Colorado, hereby ce r tify th at the above and foreg oing
is a true , accurate and complete co py of a Bil l for an Ordinance~L
int roduc~, read in ful l , and passed on first reading on the "<JJ day of U..~ , 1982 . _,_ __ _
Gary R . Higbee
•
I • •
-•
• -
PROC:LAMATIOO
WHEREAs, United National Day is designated by the UN General
Assembly each year to conmemorate the founding of the Organization on October 24, 19 45; and
WHEREAs, on this occasion, we join with the peoples of the wor ld in
reaffirming our 0011111itment to the principles upon which the UN was founded:
internat ional peace and security, respect for human rights, and the
promotion of social and economic cooperation among nations; and
WHEREAs, lJ.I Day gives us the opportunity to examine our involvement i n the world's problems and their solutions; and
WHEREAs, since the UN waa founded 37 years ago, the world has
changed dramatically, with the addition of more than 100 nations to th UN's membership; and
WHEREAs, it is clear that the power to solve the world's problems no
longer lies solely in the,hands of a few nations~ instead , all nations
must work together to relieve the suffering of millions, to halt nuclear
proliferation , and to promote economic develo?Dent; and
WHEREAs, America has made a great contribution to the creation and
continuing work of tbe United Nations and, as a part of our foreign po licy ,
the UN is a channel through which the United States can take product ive action for world peace and prosperity;
~. 'rnEREfoRE, I, ElX.ENE L. orrs, Mayor of th City of Englewood, Colorado , do herljlby proclaim October 24, 1982 as
I.IJITED NATIONS Di\Y
in the City o Englewood and urg all citizens to part ici pate in progr
and activit signed to i ncrease understanding of the problems of the UN
and to dev l p id s on ys to make the United Nat ions more effective.
·----------------------------o r
•
I •
•
•
• •
C O U N C I L C O M M U N I C A T I O N
DATE October 13, 1982 AGENDA ITEM SUBJECT
INITIATED BY Cjty Manager
CONCRETE REPLACEMENT
PROGRAM 1982
ACTION PROPOSED Award of constrycti on contract for concrete Bep)u;emeot Program
1982
BACKGROUND :
Concrete Replacement Program 1982 consists of concrete repairs and new construction
at five locations within the City of Englewood . Four of these locations are addressed
in the Regional Transportation District's Transit Street Improvement Agreement .
These four locations, including descriptions of the work, are as follows :
1) Floyd & Broadway (south west corner)~ curb radius repairs
2) Cherokee & Dartmouth (southwest corner)~ curb radius repairs
3) Broadway & Dartmouth (south west corner)~ concrete repairs an G construction
of a concrete bus pad
4) Broadway and Floyd (northeast corner) ~ concrete repairs and construction
of a concrete bus pad
The fifth location, at the eastbound ramp from Broa ay to U.S. High way 285, has
been requested by the Public Works Department. For so ti , it has been diffi-
cult for vehicles to nego iate the right turn from Broadway onto this eastbound
ramp, and consequently, there has been considerable curb damage, as well as a
hazardous situation for any pedestrian wh o might be us i ng t e sidewalk at this
location.
We would propose to di fy and relocate the handicap ramp on the sou thea st corner
and modify the radius and construct a handicap ramp on the northeast corner at this
location.
FINANCIAL:
RTO has COfflfflitted for th ac ual costs to a ximu of $17,500 for i proveaents at
their four locations. Th following is br akdown of estimated expenditures and
funding :
•
I • •
•
•
• •
-2-
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AVAILABLE FUNDING
Construction per bid $18,597.21
RTD
City section
$17,319.68
1,277.53
RTD per agreement-----------------------------------------$17,500.00 Maximum
City share {available in 1982
Road & Bridge Fund)-------------------------------------1,277.53
REC0"4ENDATION:
Three bids were received for construction of Concrete Replacement Program 1982
as follows:
E & J Co ncrete
Eby Contractor
J & N Concr e te
$22,863.52
21,425.25
18,597.21
The engineer's estimate was-----------------------17,451.35.
We recommend that the construction of Concrete Replacement Program 1982 be awarded
to the low bidder, J & N Concrete, int e amount of $18,597.21.
J & N Concrete is a small but well-established company in the Engl ewood area. We
have had previous experience with them and have always been satisfied with their
work.
RA /ldo
•
,
I • •