HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-08-13 (Regular) Meeting Agenda• -
• •
•
0
CITY COUNCIL MEETING -Special
August 13, 1979
•
-
•
•
(
•
SPECIAL MEETING:
•
• •
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
August 13, 1979
The City Council of the City of Englewood , Arapahoe
County, Colorado, met in special session on August 13, 1979, at 7:00 p.m.
Mayor Taylor, presiding, called the meeting to order.
The invocation was given by Councilman David Clayton.
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor James L. Taylor.
Mayor Taylor asked for roll call. Upon a call of the roll, the following were present:
Council Members Willi uuw , Smith, Harper, Clayton, Mann, Taylor.
Absent: None.
The Mayor declared a quorum present.
* * * * * *
Also present were: City Manager McCown
City Attorney Berardini
Director of Community Development
Wanush
Director of Finance/ex officio
City Clerk-Treasurer James
Deputy City Clerk Watkins
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CO N-
SIDER AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND SIGN CODE TO ALL OW
POLITICAL SIGNS IN CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL DI STRICTS. Councilman
Clayton seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes :
Nays :
Council Members Williams, Smith, Harper,
Clayton , Mann, Taylor.
None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
•
I •
-
•
•
•
August 13, 1979
Page 2
•
• •
Director of Community Development Richard Wanush ap-
peared before Council. Director Wanush stated this public hear-
ing was called as a result of a recommendation from the Planning
and Zoning Commission following their public hearing on June 19,
1979. The recommendation relates to amending the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance and the section dealing with the sign code. The
amendment adds a Section 11 to a list of permitted signs in 22.7-
7 (a) low density residential districts and permits the placement
of political signs on a lot in residential districts. Director
Wanush discussed the restrictions on the number, size, placement,
illumination and animation of these signs.
Director Wanush stated the Planning and Zoning Commis-
sion's recommendation and analysis resulted from a recommendation
of the Election Commission. On February 15, 1979, Commission Mem-
ber and Director of Finance William D. James sent a memo to the
Assistant City Manager stating that the Election Commission had
developed certain guidelines for the installation of political
signs and recommended that the related ordinances be changed. Mr.
James asked that the Department of Community Development and the
Planning Commission analyze the Election Commission's recommenda-
tion and act accordingly.
Director Wanush answered various questions posed by
Council relating to defining terms and how he would interpret
certain terms applicable to the ordinance, prohibiting the place-
ment of signs on utility poles, the restricted timing and im-
posed penalty on the erection and removal of political signs.
Councilman Smith asked for comments from the Election
Commission concerning the time limitations.
William D. James, Election Commission member and Director
of Finance, appeared before Council. Mr. James stated the Commis-
sion wanted reasonable times to have campaign signs up. Mr. James
stated the Commission finds the ordinance being considered at this
hearing acceptable •
Mayor Taylor asked if anyone else wished to speak in
favor of the ordinance. No one responded.
Mayor Taylor asked if anyone wanted to speak against
the ordinance. No one responded.
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Coun-
cilman Harper seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the
vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams, Smith, Harper,
Clayton, Mann, Taylor •
I •
-
-
•
•
(
•
•
-· •
August 13, 1979
Page 3
Nays: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown requested Council's confirmation to
set up a meeting with the Planning and Zoning Commission, Thursday, August 16, 1979, to review the Comprehensive Plan.
Council agreed to have a dinner meeting at 5:30 p.m.
Councilman Mann requested that Mr. McCown notify the members of
the Downtown Development Authority of this meeting.
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown requested that Council discuss the
sewer plant and its needed expansion at the next study session.
* * * * * *
Mayor Taylor noted there was information contained in
Council's packet from the City Attorney concerning a liquor hear-ing authority.
City Attorney Berardini stated once Council has had time
to review the information, he would discuss the possibility of pre-paring an ordinance creating such an authority.
* * * * * *
7:25 p.m • Mayor Taylor adjourned the meeting without a vote at
I •
-
•
. vt. ... ;, ~ ·rrr:;:; s-1q
7:UJ(lh)·
Mowed Sec: nded 0
~.
;
Wlli1a1115
~r
::illl1ti'l
Haro.or
· CID'ton
Mann
•
• •
ROLL CALL
A 'Ye
~r _!ay)_!lr
. 1
~ s n sen Ab tlf Ab t
I .
•
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
No eel Sec nded y 0 1\Ye lY sta n sen Wflifam5 ~ ~
A Na Ab Ab t
Siiifi'n &.--H4rn,. .. i.-Cll.Vton v-Mann ,_
111iVo r TaY..12 r ~
•
• I .
•
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ave Nay Abstafn Absent Wf_l]famll ...--
_.,~"'";
;)lftttn --Harruor ,__ _,..... Clayton £,..-_,.......
Mann ,._
ll'lavor ray_l_pr 1.--
/tA-
•
I . •
•
-
•
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Noved Seconded
Wfllfam!l
Aye ~ Abstafn Absent
w .........
_;)lllltn
Harn•r
Cla.vton
Mann
Mayor ray_l_Er
cwr-~~r~~
~~ ~~'?f~~~v.
w~~ ~C.~ h. lliiJ.L~
-~ ~ ~~~----d'
' .
•
I .
-
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ave Nav Abstain Absent
Williams
-w.~ ..
;)lllltn
~arnar
Clavton
Mann
"llliYor Tav_JEr
J+-~r~~
J~-~..vi~ -~-~~~
~ --~~~~
v+~~~~
~-o.dui~ ~~Lrv ~~~·
~ ~/u.J-p..-t. ~ ~
-w~ o&-r ~ .-~
~J::_,d)U -
_ #.J,~ .LnJ . • .r ft'lLIIIL ~ . ~~-7 o·-~~ o---
•
I .
• -
• •
-
ROLL CALL
lfoyed Seconded Aye Nay Abstatn Absent NTH tams
__lilil!fwar
:illl1tl'l
HarD;;
Clt.vton
Mann
MaYor Ta.Y_l.P.r
• I .
•
• -
• •
-
·,
ROLL CALL
' 0
~e !.l s n sen ltlll1allls ~ ~
No ad Sec ncfed A Ab taf Ab t
~n ..It:::=.. ,__
..Hlroer '--CI.ttton ~ ..r._ Mlnn ,__.
~or ..!.'!Y_I_!lr .Je::::::::.
•
• I .
• •
• -
• •
ROll CALL
Noved Second@<~
Abstatn Absent
•
• I . •
•
-
-
•
•
•
7:30 P.M.
•
• •
AGENDA FOR TilE
PUBLIC HEARING OF
THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 13, 197~
Call to order, invoca~ pledge and roll call.
~4tf'
of allegiance,
1. Public Hearing.
(a) To consider amendment~ to the zoning ordinance
and sign code to allow political signs in
certain residential districts. (Copies enclosed.)
2. Adjournment.
1lJ/JL td~,1~WN
City Manager
•
I .
-
•
•
(
•
ORDINANCE NO.
SERIES OF 197-9--
•
• •
BY AUTHORITY
A BILL FOR
COUNCIL BILL NO. 30
INTRODUCED BY
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTIONS a. AND b. OF SECTION 22.7-7
(SIGN CODE) OF THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE (ORO. NO. 26,
SERIES 1963, AS AMENDED) BY ADDING NEW SUBSECTIONS THERETO AUTHORIZ-
ING THE PLACING OF POLITICAL SIGNS IN CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL ZONED
DISTRICTS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD,
COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. That Subsections a. and b. of Section 22.7-7 of the
C1ty Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance (Ord. No. 26, Series 1963, as
amended) is hereby amended by adding new subsections thereto to
read as follows:
22.7-7: Signs Permitted in Enumerated Zone Districts.
Upon application to and issuance by the Division of a permit
therefor, the following signs, but no others, may be erected
and maintained in the enumerated Zone Districts.
a. Low Density Residential Districts: R-1-A, R-1-B, R-1-C,
R-2, R-2-c, and R-4.
11. POLITICAL SIGNS. SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS HEREINAFTER
SET FORTH, POLITICAL SIGNS MAY BE ERECTED AND MAINTAINED;
PROVIDED THAT SUCH SIGNS SHALL NOT BE A BANNER OF PAPER
OR CLOTH, SHALL NOT BE POSTED MORE THAN FORTY-FIVE (45)
DAYS PRIOR TO THE ELECTION TO WHICH THE SIGN RELATES,
AND SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FOLLOWING
THE ELECTION TO WHICH THE SIGN RELATES.
(a) PERMITTED TYPES OF POLITICAL SIGNS.
WALL, WINDOW AND GROUND.
(b) PERMITTED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POLITICAL SIGNS.
TWO (2) SIGNS FOR EACH LOT .
(c) PE~ITTED MAXIMUM AREA OF POLITICAL SIGNS.
NOT TO EXCEED TWELVE (12) SQ. FEET TOTAL SIGN AREA.
(d) PERMITTED MAXIMUM HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE.
SIX (6) FEET.
(e) PERMITTED LOCATION.
SHALL BE WITHIN BOUNDARY LINES OF LOT ON WHICH SIGN
IS LOCATED.·
(1) SIGNS ON PUBLIC UTILITY POLES PROHIBITED.
(2) SIGNS CANNOT INTERFERE WITH PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
•
•
I •
-
•
•
•
•
• •
(f) PERMITTED ILLUMINATION.
SHALL NOT BE ILLUMINATED.
(g) ANIMATION.
SHALL NOT BE ANIMATED.
b. High Density Residential Districts: R-3.
11. POLITICAL SIGNS. SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS HEREIN-
AFTER S~T FORTH, POLITICAL SIGNS MAY BE ERECTED AND
MAINTAINED; PROVIDED THAT SUCH SIGNS SHALL NOT BE A
BANNER OF PAPER OR CLOTH, SHALL NOT BE POSTED MOkE
THAN FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS PRIOR TO THE ELECTION ~0
WHICH THE SIGN RELATES, AND SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN
FIFT~EN (15) DAYS FOLLOWING THE ELECTION TO WHICH THE
SIGN RELATES.
(a) PERMITTED TYPES OF POLITICAL SIGNS.
WALL, WINDOW AND GROUND.
(b) PERMITTED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POLITICAL SIGNS.
TWO (2) SIGNS FOR EACH LOT.
(c) PERMITTED MAXIMUM AREA OF POLITICAL SIGNS.
NOT TO EXCEED TWELVE (12) SQ. FEET TOTAL AREA.
(d) PERMITTED MAXIMUM HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE.
SIX (6) F~ET.
(e) PERMITTED LOCATION.
SHALL BE WITHIN BOUNDARY LINES OF LOT ON WHICH SIGN
IS LOCATED.
(1) SIGNS ON PUBLIC UTILITY POLES PROHIBITED.
(2) SIGNS CANNOT INTERFERE WITH PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
(f) PERMITTED ILLUMINATION.
SHALL NOT BE ILLUMINATED.
(g) ANIMATION.
SHALL NOT BE ANIMATED.
Introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on
the 16th day of July, 1979.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the ______ day of
July, 1979.
Attest:
Mayor
e x officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, William D. James, do hereby certify that the above and
f oregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill for an
Ordinance, introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on
the __ day of July, 1979.
ex officio city Clerk-Treasurer
..,2-
I •
-
•
•
(
•
•
• •
MEKOi.ANDUM
TO: .Jim Curna11. Asaiatant City Hanqer
~: William D . .Jamaa. Director of Finance
DAXE: February 15. 1979
Sua.J£CT: Campaign Si~s 1n llesidaneial Areas
The Election Commia»iou baa developed guidelines for campaign signa
iD residential areas. The eo-isaioo felt that by permitting cam-
paign si~a additional voter interest or awareness would be ~anareted.
The Coaaission ia requesting that our ,utdali.naa be revised by the
CoiiiiiiUDity Development Det-are-nt and the Planning and Zoning CoDIIlia-
aion to insure consistency with other aspects of the praaant sign
coda. 4lao. the Coaai.saion would like to have camp&ii,'D signa part
of the E.M.C. ~laction Section. Chapter 4. for aasier reference and
clarification.
n1a recommeoded ~uidaliDaa would ba as follows:
'.Uma Limits
1. May ba ~osted not mora than 24 days before the election. I)
2. Must be rUIOved no later than two days after the election.
Penalty for non-compliance -$2,.00 per eign ~·r day
Penalty ia candidates liability
&eatrictiona -Si&a and TYt?•
1. siaa !a llilta~to 12 square feat.
2. Li6btad sijn& axe ~rohibitad.
3. Animated ai~a ara prohibited.
4. Si~a on public utility poles are prohibited.
S. Si~s can not iDtarfar with tha ~ublic ri~ht-of-wey.
Campaioe si-ea must co~ply with all other aspects of tba sign coda.
Per~ta are not required for C!!ia~ ai~na •
Your office will need to authorise tha Community Development Dapart-
~t to proceed. The appropriate ordinance will need to be drawn
u~ and in affect by August 1. 1979.
wDJ/jlw
cc: Andy McCown V'
B.i.ck Wanuah
•
I . •
-
c
(
•
•
•
•
•
,. •
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION
OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DATE: June 19, 1979
SUBJECT: Aaendaent of Coaprehensive Zoning Ordinance §22.7-7 Sign Code
RECOIOIENDATION:
Pierson aoved:
Carson seconded: The Planning Comaission recommend to City
Council that the Comprehensive Zoping Ordi-
nance, §22.7-7, Sign Code, be amended as follows:
22.7.7 Signs Permitted lE Enumerated~ Districts.
a. Low-Densij! Residential Districts: R-1-A, R-1-B,
R-1-C, tR *~ t.Ji~ R-2, R-2-c, and R-4.
11. POLITICAL SIGNS. SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS
HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, POLITICAL SIGNS MAY
BE ERECTED AND MAINTAINED; PROVIDED THAT
SUCH SIGNS SHALL NOT BE A BANNER OF PAPER
OR CLOTH, SHALL NOT BE POSTED MORE THAN
FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS PRIOR TO THE ELECTION
TO WHICH THE SIGN RELATES, AND SHALL BE
REMOVED WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FOLLOWING
THE EL!CTION TO WHICH THE SIGN RELATES.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
PERMITTED TYPES OF POLITICAL SIGNS.
WALL, WINDOW AND GROUND. -
PERMITTED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POLITICAL SIGNS. -
TWO eMK ~~* (2) SIGNS FOR EACH ~r ~SKK e• SKK Z8KK LOT.
PERMITTED MAXIMUM AREA OF POLITICAL SIGNS. --
NOT'To EXCEED TWELVE (12) SQUARE FEET .._.S*eK TOTAL SIGN AREA •
PERMITTED MAXIMUM HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE. SIX (6) FEET. --
(e) PERMITTED LOCATION.
SHALL BE WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LINES OF
THE LOT ON WHICH THE SIGN IS LOCATED •
(1) SIGNS ON PUBLIC UTILITY POLES ARE
PROHIBITED.
(2) SIGNS CANNOT INTERFERE WI1ll 1llE
PUBLIC RIGHT-oF-WAY •
•
I .
• -
• •
( {f) PERMITTED ILLUMINATION.
SHALL NOT BE ILLUMINATED.
(&) ANIMATION.
SHALL JiOT BE ANIMATED.
b. ~Density Residential ~istricts: lbdb1* au • R-3.
11. POLITICAL SIGNS. SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS
BEUINAPfER--sft FORTH, POLITICAL SIGNS MAY BE
IRBCTBD AJfp MAIJn'AINBD; PROVIDED THAT SUCH
SIGNS SHALL lfOT BE A BANNER OF PAPER OR CLOTH ,
SHALL MOT BB POSTED IIORE 111AN FORTY-FIVE (4 5)
DAYS AllOR TO THE ELECTION TO WHICH THE SIGN
RELATES, AND SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN FIFTEEN
(15) DAYS IOLLOWING ~E ELECTION TO WHICH
THE SIGN RELATES.
(a) PERMITTED TYPES OF POLITICAL SIGNS.
WALL, WINDOW ANDGROU_ND. I -
(b) PERMITTED MAXIMUM NUIIBER OF POLITICAL
SIGNS. -
TWO (2) ftZ l(~ SIGNS FOR EACH neD
UD M' ftZ zatz LOT.
(c) PERMITTED MAXIMUM AREA . OF POLITICAL
SIGNS.
NOT TO EXCEED TWELVE (12) SQUARE
ftll ftG TOTAL SIGN AREA.
FEET
(d) PERMITTED MAXIMUM HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE.
SIX (6) FEET. ---
(e) PERMITTED LOCATION.
SHALL BE WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LINES OF
THE LOT ON WHICH THE SIGN IS LOCATED.
(1) SIGNS ON PUBLIC UTILITY POLES ARE • PROHIBITED.
(2) SIGNS CANNOT INTERFERE WITH THE
THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY .
(f) PERMITTED ILLUMINATION.
I SHALL NOT BE ILLUMINATED .
• •
(g) ANIMATION.
SHALL NOT BE ANIMATED.
("
•
-
(
•
•
•
•
• •
AYES: Tanguaa, Becker, Carson, Pierson
NAYS: Draper, Lathrop
ABSTAIN: Bilo
ABSENT: Williaaa, Saitb
Tbe aotion carried.
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning co .. ission.
I •
-
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -1-
STAFF REPORT RE:
•
• •
SIGN CODE AMENDMENT
Case #13-79
Amen~ent to the Sign Code, §22.7-7 of the Comprehen-
sive Zoning Ordinance, to permit Political Signs in certain Zone Districts.
DATE TO BE CONSIDERED:
June 19, 1979
APPLICANT:
Initiated by the City of Englewood.
PURPOSE OF ACTION;
At this time, Political Signs are permitted to be
displayed only in the co .. ercial and Industrial Zone Dis-
tricts, Many persons feel that it is important to generate
as much interest as possible in the election process and, by
peraitting candidates or persons backing a particular issue
to install political signs in the residential districts, more
persons would be made aware of an upcoaing ~lection.
PROCEOORE:
Following the Public Hearing, the Planning Co .. ission
will aake a recommendation to the City Council, approving or
disapproving the proposed amendment. If the recommendation
from the Comaission is favorable, the City Council will hold
a Public Hearing on the proposed amendment. If the Commission
recommendation is not favorable, the City Council could choose
to hold a Public Hearing anyway. If the proposal is approved
by the City Council, the Council will amend §22.7-7 of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance by Ordinance.
PROPOSAL:
It is proposed that Politic~! Signs be permitted in
the R-1-A, R-1-B, R-1-C, R-2, R-2-C, R-4, and R-3 Residential
Zone Districts, and that standards be established for the
display of those signs as follows:
•
I •
-
(
•
•
•
•
• •
STAFF REPORT
Page -2-SIGN CODE AMENDMENT
Case #13-79
22.7.7 Signs Permitted~ Enumerated~ Districts,
a. Low-Densi~esidentia1 Districts: R-1-A, R-1-B,
R-1-C, .. iiJX~ R-2, R-2-C, and R-4,
11. POLITICAL SIGNS. SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS
HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, POLITICAL SIGNS MAY
BE ERECTED AND MAINTAINED; PROVIDED THAT
SUCH SIGNS SHALL NOT BE A BANNER OF PAPER
OR CLOTH, SHALL NOT BE POSTED MORE THAN
FORTY-FIVE (45) DAYS PRIOR TO THE ELECTION
TO WHICH THE SIGN RELATES, AND SHALL BE
REMOVED WITHIN FIFTEEN (15) DAYS FOLLOWING
THE ELECTION TO WHICH THE SIGN RELATES.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
PERMITTED TYPES OF POLITICAL SIGNS.
WALL, WINDOW ANDGROUND. -
PERMITTED MAXIMUM NUMBER OF POLITICAL
SIGNS. -
TWO eKK ~~* (2) SIGNS FOR EACH ~r
UJIK 81: DE Z8JIK LOT.
PERMITTED MAXIMUM AREA OF POLITICAL
SIGNS. -------wor-m EXCEED TWELVE (12) SQUARE FEET
BJl fta TOTAL SIGN AREA.
PERMITTED MAXIMUM HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE,
SIX (6) FEET, --
PERMITTED LOCATION.
SHALL BE WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LINES OF
THE LOT ON WHICH THE SIGN IS LOCATED,
(1) SIGNS ON PUBLIC UTILITY POLES ARE
PROHIBITED •
(2) SIGNS CANNOT INTERFERE WITH THE
PUBLIC RIGHT-oF-WAY.
PERMITTED ILLUMINATION.·
SHALL NOT BE ILLUIIINATED.
ANIMATION.
SHALL NOT BE ANIMATED •
•
I •
-
(
•
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -3-
•
• •
SIGN CODE AMENiaiENT
Case #13-79
b. Rilb Density Residential Districts:
b •• R-3.
11. POLITICAL SIGNS. SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS
HEREINAFTER SET FORTH, POLITICAL SIGNS MAY BE
ERECTED AND MAINTAINED; PROVIDED THAT SUCH
SIGNS SHALL NOT BE A BANNER OF PAPER OR CLOTH ,
SHALL NOT BE POSTED MORE THAN 1-'0RTY-FIVE (45)
DAYS PRIOR TO THE ELECTION TO WHICH THE SIGN
RELATES, AND SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN FIFTEEN
(15) DAYS FOLLOWING THE ELECTION TO WHICH
THE SIGN RELATES, .
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
PERMITTED TYPES OF POLITICAL SIGNS,
WALL, WINDOW ANDGROUND.
PERMITTED IIAXIIIUM NUMBER OF POLITICAL
SIGNS. --
TWO (2) 8D :(~ SIGNS FOR EACH Deft
UD -DE zars LOT.
PERMITTED IIAXIIIUM AREA OF POLITICAL
SIGNS.
NOT TO EXCEED TWELVE (12) SQUARE FEET
._. ~ TOTAL SIGN AREA.
PERMITTED IIAXIIIUJI HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE.
SIX (6) FEET. ----
PERMITTED LOCATION.
SHALL BE WITHIN THE BOUNDARY LINES OF
THE LOT ON WHICH THE SIGN IS LOCATED.
(1) SIGNS ON PUBLIC UTILITY POLES ARE
PROHIBITED •
(2) SIGNS CANNOT INTERFERE WITH THE
THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY .
PERMITTED ILLUMINATION .
SHALL NOT BE ILLUMINATED,
ANIMATION.
SHALL NOT BE ANIMATED • I •
-
•
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -4-
•
• •
SIGN COlE AIIENDIIENT
Case #13-79
STAPF RECOMMENDATION :
Tbe staff is of the opinion that the display of
Political Signs in Residential Districts within the proposed
guidelines, will serve a public purpose and should be per-
aitted. Particularly in the Englewood School Board and
Municipal elections, the voter turn out is poor if not
deplorable. It would seea that the aajority of our voters
have taken to heart the advice of Williaa Butler Yeats in .!!!! ~ Stone Cross, to:
" ••• stay at hoae and drink your beer
And let the neighbors vote."
If •ore interest in these elections could be generated by
the display of Political Signs, the staff would see it as a very positive step •
I •