HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-01-30 (Special) Meeting Agenda•
• •
0
CITY COUNCIL MEETING -January 30, 1978
SPECIAL
•
(
(
•
SPECIAL MEETING:
•
• -
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
January 30, 1978
The City Council of the City of Engl e wood, Arapahoe
County, Color.ado, met in special session on January 30, 1978, at
7:30 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann, presiding, called the mee ting to
order .
The invocation was given by Councilman Donald Smith. The
Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Pro T e rn Mann.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked for roll call. Upon a call of the
roll, the following were present:
Council Members Williams, Weber, Smith, Harper, Clayton ,
Mann.
Absent: Taylor.
The Mayor Pro Tern d eclared a quorum present and stated
that Mayor James L . Taylor was out of the city on vacati on .
Also present we re: City Manager Mccown
Assistant City Manager Curnes
City Attorney Berardini
Director. of Public Works Waggoner
Director of Engineering Services
Diede
Deputy City Clerk Watkins
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CON-
SIDER THE PROPOSED PAVING DISTRICT #25. Councilman Clayton seconded
the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follo ws:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Harper, Clayton, Williams,
Weber, Smith, Mann.
No ne.
Council Member Taylor.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
•
I • •
•
January 30, 1978
Page 2
•
• •
City Manag e r Mccown stated the purpose of this me e ting
was to consider th e r ecommendations for various streets, alleys,
sidewalks, and curb and gutter improvements which ar e to b e include d
in Paving District No. 25 . City Manager Mc c own gave a brief back-
ground on the reasons for creating paving districts; how the paving
districts are handl e d; and r e ad from the City Charter the Council 's
authority concerning a paving district. City Manager Mccown stat e d
that the Council will hear from the public present tonight of the
objections and approvals to pave certain streets; then r e view these
objections and approvals in order to make a decision by February 6th.
City Manager Mccown stated that the Council can delete streets from
the district; but they cannot add any streets to the list that has
already been presented to them.
* * * * * *
Director of Public Works Waggoner along with the assistance
of Director of Engineering Services Died e presented the location of
streets and the type of improvements proposed for the paving district.
Director Waggoner discussed the specific improvements that the City
proposes to do on each street; the method of calculation of assess-
ment; and the property owner's portion of payment and the City's
portion of payment for the district.
Director of Public Works Waggoner stated that a prope rty
owner could hire a contractor to pore the concrete if he or sh e
did not want the City to do the work; however, the contractor had
to be chosen before April 3 and the concrete had to be pored before April 6.
Director of Public Works Waggoner stated that the City woul d
replace any trees that had to be removed up to four trees per pro-perty.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann instructed the audience that he was
goi ng to read th e list of the streets in the proposed pav ing d istict
and then go through each street asking for those in favor to speak
first then those against the paving distr ic t to speak next.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 500 -700 East Amherst and asked
if ther e was anyone in favor of the overlay. No one replied.
overlay . Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked there was anyone against the
The Clerk entered into the record a petition signed by
thirty-four property owners and a cover letter from Gerald w. Pool,
643 East Amherst Place, protesting th e overlay •
•
I •
(
(
•
January 30, 1978
Pag e 3
•
• -
Councilman Weber poin ted out that the petition repre-
sented 100% of the property ownership of the affected land ar e a.
Gerald W. Pool, 643 East Amherst Place, appear e d b efo re
Council and stated that he was the spokesman for the property o wn ers
who had signed the petition protesting the inclusion of East
Amherst Place in the paving district; however, Mr. Pool ask ed if
thos e present wo uld indica te to the Council that he did r e present their opinion by standing.
The property owners stood up and the count showed thirty-four people present .
Mr. Pool stated that if the street could get into the
paving district by 100% vote; then the street should be able
to get out of the paving district by 100% vot e .
Mr. Pool stated that the street work is not necessary
and if it was necessary then the payments should come from
general revenues derived from the general tax mill levy. Mr. Pool
stated that there has been no cost to the City for maintenance
because the stree t is in good shape, and there are only a few
minor cracks which do not pose any hazard. Mr. Pool concluded
by stating that the street has been e xpos ed to long periods of
abuse by dirt dump trucks and heavy equipment used in construct-
ing City storm sewers on East Bates Avenue and in the East Amherst Avenue and Clarkson Street area.
I Peggy Swinney, 683 East Amherst Place, appeared before
the Council and invited the Council to drive to the neighborhood
on Clarkson between Hampden and Belleview and notice how rough
this area is compared to East Amherst Place. Ms. Swinn ey stated
that the truck traffic is so heavy that these trucks are causing
the damag e to th e streets and not the residents of the area.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 400 600 West Bates Avenue and asked if there was
replied.
anyone in favor of paving the street. No one
Mayor Pro Te rn Mann asked if there was anyone agai nst the paving. No one r e plied.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read the alley East of 3700 South
Broadway and asked if there was anyone in favor of paving this area .
The Clerk en tered into the record a statement from Cleo
Hickman, 3798 South Broadway, i n favor of paving the alley •
•
I •
J anuary 3 0, 1 978
Pag e 4
•
• -
Ma yo r Pro Tern Mann ask e d if t he r e was a ny on e agai n st the paving .
Th e Cle rk e ntered int o the reco rd a le tt er o b jec ti n g
to the paving fr o m Donna Weitzel, 3775 South Lincoln.
Mrs. Vivian Weir, 3753 South Lincoln, appeared befor e
the Council; presented and entered into the record a petition
sig ned by five property owners objecting to the paving of the
alley. Mr s. Weir asked the Council why the alley wa s being
considered in the paving district.
Director Waggoner stated that he had rec e ived r e -
quests to include several alleys in a paving district and by
including them in a paving district the City can find out if
the people wan t these alleys paved. Dir ector Waggoner stated
that most of the r e quests came f rom the businesses.
Mrs. Weir stated that the residents use the alleys
very little; however, the businesses use the alleys for parking,
etc ., and the residents do not want it paved.
Director Waggoner stated that the record should re-
flect that four property owners of this affected area stood in opposition.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read the alley East of 4000 South
Broadway and asked if there wa s anyone in favor of the paving. No one replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against the paving of the alley.
The Clerk e nt e r ed into the record a petition signed by six
property own e rs protesting the paving of the alley.
Clarice Bernhardt, 4035 South Lincoln, appeared before
the Council and stated that the residents with exception of one
r e sident do not have alley drives and; therefore, do not use
the alley. Mrs. Bernhardt stated that most of the residents are
retired and the assessment costs would place a financial burden
o n the r e sidents. Mrs. Bernhardt stated that businesses should
pick up the majority of the cost because they are the ones who benefit the most.
Director Waggoner commented that in the past businesses
have worked out agreements with the owners along an alley to pay for
s ome of the costs; but the residents would have to approach the
business e s on this, the City cannot.
•
I • •
(
(
•
January 30, 1978
Page 5
•
• -
Ruth Glaesmer, 4025 South Lincoln, app eared before the
Council and challenged the statement that the paving would improve
the property. Mrs. Glaesmer stated that she had a fence installed
on her property after which the insurance rates increased. Mrs.
Glaesmer stated that her rates might increase again with the
new propos ed paving and she could not afford to pay for the increased
rates let alone the assessment.
Mrs. Billy Schlogeter, 4015 S. Lincoln, appeared before
the Council and read a letter that was writt en by her husband pro-
testing the paving because the cost. Mrs. Schlogeter stated that
the alley did not have enough traffic to warrant the paving.
Mrs. Schlogeter then entered the letter into the record.
* * * * • *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read the alley East of 4700 South
Broadway and asked if there was anyone in favor of paving the
alley. No one replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against
the paving of the alley.
Howard Sheridan, 4750 South Lincoln, appeared before ·
the Council and stated that this alley did not border his pro-
perty but wanted to state his opposition to the paving of all
alleys on South Broadway. Mr. Sheridan recalled an incident
in which his wife was involved on 4500 South Broadway. The alley
was not paved and Mr. Sheridan wanted to point out that the alley
should be paved and assessed against the businesses and not the
property owners of this area.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 000 -100 East Centennial
Avenue and asked if there was anyone in favor of paving this
area. No one replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if anyone was against the
paving. No one replied.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 1900 West Cornell Avenue and
asked if there was anyone in favor of paving this area. No one
replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if anyone was against paving
this area. No one replied.
* * * * * *
•
0
I • •
(
j
Janu a r y 30, 1 9 78
Pag e 6
•
• -
Mayor Pro Tern Mann r e ad 3 000 South Dartmou t h Ci rcl e a nd
asked if th e re was anyone in favor o f o v erl a yi ng t h is a r e a. No o ne replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if t here wa s anyon e against
th e paving of this area. No one r e pl ied.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 3200 Sout h Delawar e Stree t and
asked if there was anyone in favor of paving this area. No on e replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if th e r e was anyone against the paving.
The Clerk entered into the r e c o rd a p e tition sign e d
by twenty prope rty owners protesting the paving.
Harold Jones, 3285 South Delaware, appeared be f ore
the Council and stated that the petition contained all the pro-
perty owners with the exception of five. Mr. Jones stated that
he was the spokesman for the group and stated that it was the
group's opinion that the street did not need paving; seve ral
peopl e wer e retired and would be placed in a financial bind
to pay for the assessment. Mr. Jones stated that most of the
traffic came from outside the neighborhood.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 4100 South Elati Street and
asked if there was anyone in favor of the overlay. No one r e plied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against the overlay,
Six people stood up to indicat e their prot e st.
Bill War, 4170 South Elati, appeared before th e Council
a n d stated that the road was in good shape and did not need the n e w
s u rf ac e . Mr. War agr e ed with Mr. Jones on the traffic coming from Ci nder e lla City.
S u s a n Barrow, 4173 South Elat i , appeared be f ore th e
Cou ncil and ask e d for clarification of the facts on base and
asphalt levels on the street. Director of Engineering Services
Diede quoted th e depth of the base and asphalt. In answer to Mrs,
Bar r o w's question on the inconsistency, Director Diede replied
that th e bu i ld e r who laid the street did not install the suf-
ficie nt amount of asphalt or base course. Director Diede also
stat ed t h a t the tests are only a cross section of the street.
•
I • •
n
-
(
(
January 30, 1978
Page 7
•
• •
G. B. Story, 4150 South Elati, appeared before the
Council and stated that the street was in good condition. In
answer to Mr. Story's question as to the condition of the street
when it came into the City, Director Waggoner replied that
there are several streets in the City that were dev eloper paved
before they are take n into th e City. Director Waggoner stated
that some of these areas were developed most all of the time
under little restrictions; consequently, when the City took
these areas in1 the streets have checked out to be below the
City's standards.
Mr. Story asked if it was too late to get up a petition .
City Attorney Berardini stated that a second public hearing on
the final reading of the ordinance is on February 21, 1978, and a
petition of protest could be presented at that time.
Mr. Story suggested that speed bumps be placed on the
street in order to control the traffic.
George Yod a, 4100 South Elati, appeared before the
Council and stated that he had a sidewalk put in last year and
asked if he was going ha ve to pay for anoth e r one if the street
is paved.
Director Waggoner stated that an overlay is proposed
and if the sidewalk other than what was r e paired last year needs
repair than that work will be done.
Mr. Yoda expressed concern over the traffic and hazard-
ous conditions that exist.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann assured Mr. Yoda that the Chief of
Police would be informed of this matter.
• • • • • •
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 3000 South Fox and asked if
there was anyone in favor of the paving of this area. No one
replied .
Mayor Pro Te rn Mann asked if there wa s anyone against
the paving of this area.
Bobby Lottrell, 3150 South Fox, appeared before the
council . Mr. Lottrell stated that the street was in need of
repaving; however, he b elie ved that the City tore up th e street in
order to work on the water mains and he did not think the people
should pay for the proper replacement of the street. Mr. Lottrell
stated that most of the traffic is from the iron trucks and not the
residents of the area.
Councilman Clayton requested that the staff include
in their report of this meeting the designation for the heavier
•
D
I • •
•
January 30, 1978
Page 8
•
• -
trucks and the construction of the st r eet between General Iron Works
and Dartmouth.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 4000 South Galapago and asked
if there was anyone in favor of the paving of the area.
Gary McKinney, 4084 South Galapago, appear e d before the
Council and stated that he was in favor of paving the area.
Mr. McKinney stated that this area was a fairly new subdivision
and the streets are dirt. Mr. McKinney stated that the costs
will not get any cheaper and because of economics itwould be b e st
if the City would go ahead and pave the area now. Mr. McKinne y
stated that the neighborhood is mostly younger couples and could
afford to pay the assessment over the next few years.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against
the paving of the area. No one replied.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 4100 South Huron Street and
asked if there was anyone in favor of paving this area.
Mrs. Skinner , 4190 South Huron, appeared before the
Council and stated that she has not taken any position on this
issue. Mrs. Skinner stated that she lived opposite the City
Ditch and wanted to know who would pay the assessment.
Director Waggoner stated that all the City could
get in was twenty-four feet and Mrs. Skinner would be assessed
for eighteen feet.
Mrs. Helen Brundage, 4140 South Huron, appeared before
the Council and asked if the City would eventually pave all the
streets in Englewood.
Directo r Waggoner replied that all the streets would
eventually be proposed and the paving depended on Council's
appro val . In answer to Mrs. Brundage's question about eliminat-
ing curbs and gutters and blacktoppi ng the street, Director Wag goner
replied that he had suggested this route; however, in talking
to Mr. Hamilto n, Mr. Hamilton stated that this was not the desire
of the n eig hbors and requested that the street be placed in a
district.
* * * * * *
•
I • •
(
(
•
January 30, 1978
Page 9
•
• -
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone in favor o f
paving this ar ea , 4100 South Huron. No one replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against the
paving of this area. No one replied.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann declared a recess at 9:15 p.m. The
Cou ncil reconvened at 9:35 p.m. Upon a call of the roll, the fol-
lowing were present :
Council Members Williams, Weber, Smith, Harper, Clayton,
Mann.
Absent: None.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared a quorum present.
* * • * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 100 East Layton Avenue and asked
if there was anyone in favor of paving this area. No one replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against the
paving of this area.
Howard Sheridan, 4750 South Lincoln, appeared before
Council and stated that he felt it was unfair for the surrounding
people to be assessed 14% for their use of the street. Mr. Sheridan
asked why speed bumps have not been proposed for this area and he
t hought the street had b ee n resurfaced last year.
Director Waggoner stated that Mr. Sheridan's assessment
was for the sidestreet and that the street was blacktopped last year
so that it would hold up until the street could be placed in a pav-
ing district. Director Waggoner also stated that the speed bumps
would not be placed in the City because they are dangerous for
all vehicles.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 400 East Layton Avenue and asked
if there was anyone in favor of paving this area. No one replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against the
paving. No one replied.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 600 -800 West Oxford Avenue and
asked if there was anyone in favor of paving this area •
•
I • •
.......
January 30, 1978
Page 10
•
• •
Gene Kroll, 48 5 South Fox, appeared before Counci l and
stated that h e was in favor of the paving. Mr. Kroll stated th at
he was tired of the dust .
Gary McKinney, 4084 South Galapago , appear e d before Council
and stated again that he was in favor of paving th is area. Mr.
McKinne y stated that there are more probl e ms with the traffic in
the dust and dirt then there would be on a safe, paved street.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if th ere was anyone against the
paving of the area.
El ea nor Smith , 4100 South Galapago, appear e d before the
Council and s tat ed that she was in favor of paving the street ; but
she stated that paving the stre et has attracted heavy truck traffic
on West Oxford Avenue. Mrs. Smith stated that the street will not
hold up under the traffic conditions and will have to be overlaid
next year. Mrs. Smith requ es ted that th e street be "shelv e d" until
a congressional investigation is completed on how the street got
changed from a residential street to a truck rout e .
Ken Love, property owner of 777 West Oxford , appeared be-
fore the Council and stated that he has tried to contact the City
Attorn ey t o find out who owns the City Ditch property that adjoins
his property on th e e ast so he could determin e who would pay .
City Attorney Berardini stated that s e veral people have
contacted his office relative to th is qu estion . City Attorney
Berardini stat e d that he did not recall his name and he was sorry
he did not answer his call . City Attorney Berardini stated that
the property line varies and he would certainly find out where
his property lies if he would leave his name, address and tele-
phone number .
Mr. Love stated that his telephone numb er is 781 -8 324
and would appreciate an answer as soon as possible.
Bob Richards, 855 West Oxford Avenue, appeared before
the Council and stated that he owns an apartment on West Oxford
Avenue. Mr. Ri c hards stated that he h a s received no requests
from his t e nants to pave the street. Mr. Richards state d that
he was concerned over the proposed assessment because the assess-
ment equates the amount of money that he e xpects to net out
of his apartment inves tment for the next two years.
Sharon Richards, 855 West Oxford Avenue, appeared be-
fore Council and stated that the street is not in need of repair
and in her opinion provides no benefit to the people living in
their apartments.
Cl ayton Smith , 4140 South Galapago, appeared before the
Counc il and asked if the streets would be capable of carrying the
traffic loads; and if the streets are torn ur>,would he be recharged
for reconst ruct ion.
•
I • •
(
(
•
January 30, 1978
Page 11
•
• •
Director Waggon er replied that the City would pick up
co sts over thirty-six feet.
Mr. Smith asked why the property owner on the corner
has to pay for the materials. Mr. Smith stated that if the
street was pro-rated why couldn't th e gutter part be pro-rat ed
also.
Director Waggoner stated that the City has to assess
the adjacent owner for any concrete work and City Att o rney
Berardini agreed with Director Waggoner that is a fair assess-
ment.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann assured Mr. Smith that the City
staff would report back to him with an explanation.
In answer to Mrs . Smith's question, Director Waggoner
stated that the load limit on a street was 18 ,000 pounds per
axle according to the Model Traffic Code and he would mention the
problem to the police.
Mr. Wentz el, corner of Oxford and South Huron, appeared
before the Council and sta ted that he uses Oxford very little and
paving this area would be of no advantage to him.
Sam McGown, 805 West Oxford, appeared before the Council
and stated that the assessment was too e xpensive for people o n
fixed income like himself. Mr. McGown stated that the street could
use improvements but suggested that the Council wait and do it
later.
Crista Kroll, 4085 South Fox, appear e d bef o re the Council
and stated that the cost would increase the long e r people waited and
she was in favor of paving this area now.
One member of the audience asked the Mayor Pro Tern for a
straw vote on the paving of West Oxford .
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked for t h os e i n favor of the paving
of West Oxford to stand up . Six people stood .
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked for those against the paving
of west Oxford to stand up. Twelve people stood .
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 4500 South Pearl Street and
asked if there was anyone in the audience in favor of the paving.
No one replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against the
paving. No one replied.
* * * * * *
•
D
I • •
•
Janu a r y 3 0, 1 978
Pag e 1 2
•
• -
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 200 We s t Prince ton Avenu e an d
asked if ther e was anyone in favor of paving the area. No on e
replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if ther e was anyon e against
the paving. No one replied.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 100 -300 Eas t Princeton Avenue
and asked if there was anyone in favor of the paving. No one
replied.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was a n yone against the
paving. No one r eplied .
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 2900 South Shoshone Stree t and
asked if there was anyone in favor of the paving.
Les Stigall, appeared before the Council and stated
that there were two other property owners other than himself here
at this me eting and owned property at 2911 and 2965 South Shoshone
who would like to see the street paved to handle the trucks that
he wanted to drive on the street for future building.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against
the paving.
Harold Stoner, 2960 South Shoshone, appeared before the
Council and stated that he was protesting the widening of the street
and not the paving. Mr. Stoner stated that some of the property
owners had spent a great deal of money installing fences and would
incur more expense to have the fe nce torn down and replaced.
In answer to Mr. Stoner's question on the proposed width
of th e street, Director Waggoner replied that the City would ne e d
fo rty feet total right-of-way. Director Waggoner stated that an
apprai sal of th e five foot of property in this area would be made
an d the property owner would be contacted.
Mr. Stoner further stated that if Shoshone were widen e d
the stree t would not line up with either street north or south of
Shosh o n e .
Wa l ter Freeman, 1900 North Cornell, appeared before the
Co un ci l and stated that he owned the ground at 2980 South Shoshone.
Mr. Freeman stated that he would favor paving the street at its
p r e sent width; but he would object to the widening of the street.
Earl Stoner , 2970 South Shoshone, appeared before the
Counc il and presented a petition letter dated Novembe r 13, 1973
•
I • •
C
January 30, 1978
Page 13
•
• •
protesting the last paving district in which South Shoshone
had been included. Mr. Stoner stated he wanted the street to
be paved at its present width and not widened ,
Councilman Smith noted the date of the petition as
being some years ago and questioned if some of the property
owners had changed their minds since .
Phil Grimm, 1920 W. Cornell , appear ed before Cou ncil
and stated that the street did not need to be paved at this time .
Mayor Pro Tern Mann requested that Howard Olson, Englewood
Chamber of Commerce , speak on the paving of South Shoshone since
he was involved in the matter in 1973 .
Howard Olson, Englewood Chamber of Commerce , appear ed
before Council and stated he was merely an obs erve r of this
meeting and could not take any position at this time.
Director of Public Works Waggoner ente red into the record
a telephone message that he received from Geraldine Landsburg of
3D Investments, 2900 South Shoshone, protest ing the paving.
* * * * * *
May o r Pro Tern Mann read 2900 -3000 South Umatilla Stree t
and asked if there was anyone in favor the paving this area. No one replied.
May or Pro Tern asked if there was anyone again st the paving.
Frank Rister, 2009 West Dartmouth, appeared before Council
and asked if the City would r eplace the trees that would be removed
to widen South Umatilla. Mr . Rister stated he thought the street
was only about fifteen feet wid e now.
Director Waggoner stated if the trees had to be removed
then the City would replace them . Director Waggoner stated he
thought the street was approximately twenty feet wide now; and
the right-of-way is dedicated at thirty feet wide,
• • * • • *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 000 -400 East Union Avenue and asked if there was anyone in favor of paving this area. No one replied .
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone agai ns t the paving. No one replied.
* • • * • •
•
I •
J anuary 30, 19 7 8
Page 14
•
• -
May or Pro Tern Mann read 2900 -3000 South Vall ejo Street
and asked if ther e was anyone in favor 0f paving this ar ea. No one replied.
May or Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyo n e against the paving . No o n e replied .
* * * * * *
Ma yor Pro T e rn Mann read 5000 South Washingto n Street
and asked if there was anyone in favor of paving this area.
Edward Pain, 5090 South Washington, appeared before
Council and stated he was in favor of placing an overlay on th is
street; how eve r, Mr. Pain stated the e xpense should be paid for
by th e Utilit ie s Department. Mr. Pain stated th e d ete roriati on
of the street was due to the Utilities Department work ing on th e water mains.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against the paving.
Th e Cle rk entered into th e record a le tter from Robert
D. William s, 5050 South Washington, protesting the paving.
Myrtl e Jones, 5020 South Washington, appeared before
Council and protested the paving. Mrs. Jones stated the area
was in a sidewalk district last year and she thought the side-
walk would probably have to be replaced and paid for by the resident
after the str ee t is resurfaced.
Juanita Beenie, 5061 South Washington, appeared before
Cou nc il and stated she was against the paving .
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann read 600 South Washington Circle
and asked if anyone was in favor of the paving. No one replied.
paving . Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against the
The Clerk entered into the record three letters: 1) from
Mrs. De Backer, 616 South Washington Circle; 2) from Mar y Ditmars,
6 40 South Washington Circle; and 3) from Ernest and May Coler,
645 South Washington Circle all protesting the paving.
Arthur Rhodes, 685 South Washington Circle, appeared
befo r e Council and stated he was against the paving. Mr. Rhodes
sta t e d he had to borrow the money to pay another assessment and
he would have to borrow more money to pay for this assessment.
•
)
I • •
)
n
(
January 30 , 1978
Page 15
•
• •
Mr. Rhod es sugges t e d the Council get the cheapest bid bef o r e
publishing the list of streets in the paper. Mr. Rhodes st a t e d
the street gets very little traffic and did not need any overlay.
C.R. Neal, 672 South Washington Circle, appeared
before Counc i l and stated he was against the paving. Mr. Neal
stated if the City kept this area in the paving district then
he would recommend a surface coat.
Dorothy Clausman, 646 South Washington Circle, appear e d
before Council and stated she was against th e pav i ng. Mr s. Clausman
stated the street gets no through traffic.
Mar y Ann Schofield, appeared before Council and stated
she was against the paving. Ms. Schofield stat e d Cl arkson Street
should be include d not South Washington Circle.
Director Waggoner stated there is a boundary problem o n
South Cl arks on and until other surrounding areas allow the paving
and do their share, Clarkson would pro bably remain as it is .
Phil Grimm , 648 South Washington Circle , appeared before
the Council and sta t e d he was against the paving. Mr. Grimm
stated the street was not in that bad of condition.
Fred Weiss, 664 South Washington Circle, appeared be-
fore Council and stated he was against the paving. Mr. Weiss
stated the street need e d only minor repairs a nd the proposed
assess ment would place too much financial burd en on the property
o wn ers .
* * * * * *
May or Pro Tern Mann read 2000 -2300 West Wesley Ave nue
and asked if there was anyone in favor of th e pavi ng of this
area . No one replied .
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone against
the paving.
Richard Brent , 2229 West Wesley, appear ed before the
Council and stated he opposed the paving. Mr. Br e nt stated im-
proving the street would increase the traffic and the assessment
cost was too much of a burden .
* • • * * *
Mayo r Pro Tern Mann read 2900 -3000 South Wyandot Street
and asked if there was anyone in favor of the paving. No one re-
plied.
•
0
I • •
•
January 30, 1978
Page 16
•
• -
Ma yor Pro Tern Mann ask e d if th e r e wa s anyo n e aga i nst
the paving.
Bill Ad long , 3085 South Wyandot, appear e d bef o r e Co u ncil
and stated h e wa s against the paving. Mr. Ad long stated he wo uld lose
some of his property wh e n the street wa s widened. Mr. Ad long stated
he just installed a new fence across his property and as k ed Dir ecto r
Waggoner if the City would pay for the expense o f moving it and
replacing it. Director Waggoner stated that th e City would pick
up the expense. Mr. Adlong stated that the property front would have
to be sloped back or cut off up and down; and that he would lose
alot of his property. Mr. Adlong suggested tha t the City i nst all
a retaining wall. Mr. Adlong asked if the City would provide
the stakes for the grading if he chose to por e th e V-pan .
Director Waggoner stated that the City would do so.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if there was anyone else wi sh-
ing to speak to the Council on the paving. No one replied.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann stated that the Council is j ust as
concerned as the people in the paving district with the answers
that the staff will provide. Mayor Pro Tern Mann requ es t e d that
the staff send a copy of their answers to the p e ople between this
meeting and th e time that the Council acts on the ordinanc e .
* * * * k *
CO UN CILMAN CLAYTON MOVED TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
Councilma n Weber seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll,
the vote resu l ted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Harper, Clayton, Williams,
Weber, Smith, Mann.
Non e .
Council Member Taylor.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion carr i ed.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro T e rn Mann stated there wa s further business
that the Cou ncil had to act upon at this meet i ng a nd declared a
recess at 1 1:1 0 p.m. The Council reconvened at 11:15 p.m. Upon
a call of the roll, the following were present:
•
I • •
(
(
(
•
January 30, 1978
Page 17
•
• •
Co unc il Memb ers Williams, Weber, Smith, Harper, Cl ay ton,
Mann.
Abs e nt: Council Member Taylor.
The Mayor Pro Te rn d ec lared a qu o rum present.
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED THE COUNCIL POSTPONE ITS
SELECTION OF THE RESOLUTIONS FOR RECOMMENDATION OF THE PROJECTS
TO DRCOG. Motion died for lack of a second,
* * * * * *
RESOLUTION NO. 4, SERIES OF 1978
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO THE DENVER REGIONAL
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REQUESTING THAT U.S. 285 BETWEEN SOUTH
SANTA FE DRIVE AND SOUTH BROADWAY BE CONSTRUCTED AS A ONE-WAY
COUPLET, WITH THE PRESENT U.S. 285 AS THE WESTBOUND SEGMENT AND
WEST ITHACA AVENUE AS THE EASTBOUND SEGMENT, AND THAT FUNDING
FOR THIS PROJECT BE APPROVED AS A SUBSTITUTE PROJECT UNDER THE
I-470 TRANSFER,
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO, 4, SERIES
OF 1978, ROUGH DRAFT #1, AS PRIORITY #1. Cou nc ilman Weber seconded
the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote r e sulted as follows:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Harper, Clayton, Web e r,
Smith, Mann.
Cou ncil Member Williams.
Cou nci l Member Taylor.
The Mayor Pro Tern decla r e d the motion carried.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked for a sponsor for Rough Draft
#2 for a resolution supporting an application t o DRCOG requesti ng
that Broadway (Yale to Floyd, Quincy to Belleview), be approved
for I-4 70 transfer funding . No Cou ncil member chose to sponsor
the resolution.
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN S MITH MOVED TO PASS ROUGH DRAFT f3 FOR A RE-
SOLU TION SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO DRCOG REQUESTING THAT THE
KENYON, NAVAJO AND UNION AVENUE ARTERIAL BE APPROvED FOK I-47u
TRA NSFER FUNDING, CERTIF YINu SUPPORT FOR THE ABOVE. Councilman Cl ayton
•
I • •
January 30, 1978
Page 18
•
• -
seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Smith, Harper, Clayton.
Nays: Council Members Williams, Weber, Mann .
Absent: Council Member Taylor.
The Mayor Pro Tern d eclared the motion defeate d.
* * * * * *
RESOLUTIO N NO. 5 , SERIES OF 1978
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN APPLI CATION TO THE DENVER REGIONAL
COU NCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REQUESTING THAT THE KENYON, NAVAJO ANO
UNION AVENUE ARTERIAL BE APPROVED FOR I-470 TRANSFER FU NDING,
CERT IFYING SUPPORT FOR THE ABOVE PROJECT ANO CERTIFYING THE
INTENTION ANO ABILITY OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO MATCH FEDERAL
FUNDS IF THE PROJECT IS SELECTED.
COUNCILMAN HARPER MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 5 ,
SERIES OF 1978, ROUGH DRAFT #3. Councilman Smith seconded
the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Smith, Harper, Clayton.
Council Members Williams, Weber, Mann.
Council Member Taylor.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion defeated.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked for a sponsor for Rough Draft
#4 for a resolution supporting an application to DRCOG requesting
that South Logan Street (Dartmouth Avenue to Yal e Avenue) be
approved for I-470 transfer funding. No Council memb e r chose to sponsor the resolution.
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked for a sponsor for Rough Draft
#5 for a resolution supporting an application to DRCOG requesting
that South Bannock Street (U .S. 285 to Nassau Avenue) be approved
for I-470 transfer funding . No Council member chose to sponsor the resolution.
* * * * * *
•
)
I •
(
January 30, 1 978
Page 19
•
• •
RESOLUTION NO. 6, SERIES OF 1978
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO THE DENVER REGIONAL
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REQUESTING THAT WEST QUINCY AVENUE BE-
TWEEN SOUTH FEDERAL BOULEVARD AND SOUTH SANTA FE DRIVE BE CON-
STRUCTED AND THAT FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT BE APPROVED AS A
SUBSTITUTE PROJECT UNDER THE I-470 TRANSFER,
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO. 6,
SERIES OF 1978, ROUGH DRAFT #6, AS PRIORITY #3, Councilman
Weber seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll, the vote r e sulted a s foll o ws:
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Council Members Weber, Harper, Clayton ,
Mann .
Council Members Williams, Smith.
Council Member Taylor,
Th e May o r Pro Tern declared the motion carried,
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Te rn Mann asked if any Council Member wanted to
sponsor Rough Draft #7 for a resolution supporting the applica-
tion requesting the construction of South Clarkson Street be-
tween U.S. 285 and East Orchard Avenue.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann suspended the rules and recognized
a person in the audience wishing to speak to the Council on this matter.
Maurice Jones, 5 020 South Washington, appeared before the
Council and stated he opposed the South Clarkson Street construction
through DRCOG. Mr. Jones suggested that the Council find other means
of funding the construction because of the length of time it would
tak e DRCOG to commence action on this project.
Director Waggoner stated that the City knows how much
of Clarkson Street is in Englewood and what the City would have
to construct. Director Waggoner stated that Clarkson is in the
Urban System Program; but it is not funded.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann requested the staff provide a cost
r e port on South Clarkson in order for the Council to consider
taking on the construction itself,
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Mann's question for a
sponsor for Rough Draft #7 , no Council member chose to sponsor it.
* * * * * *
•
I •
Jan u ary 3 0 , 197 8
Page 20
•
• -
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVE D TO TAKE RESO LUITON NO. 4 , SERIES
OF 1 978, ROUGH DRAFT #1, PRIORITY #1 AND USE THA T AS THE P RIM E
EFFORT IN OBTAINING I-470 TRANSFER FUNDS. Councilma n Weber seco nd e d t he motion.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann stated that the c hair wo u ld n ot a l lo w
the motion to b e v o t e d up o n b e cause n o t a ll t he prio rit ies ha ve bee n discussed.
* * * * * *
RESOLUTION NO. 7, SERIES OF 1978
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE APPL ICATI ON FOR REQUESTING THE CON -
STRUCTION OF FLOYD AVENUE BETWEEN SOUTH GAL APAG O STREET AND SOUTH
ZUNI STREET AS A PROJECT OF REGIONAL SIGN IFICAN CE THA T I NV OLVES
THE COMMUNITIES OF ENGLEWOOD AND SHERIDAN.
COUNCILMAN
OF 1978, ROUGH DRA FT
seconded the mot i on.
as follows:
Aye s:
Nays:
Ab s e nt:
WEBER MOVED TO PASS RE SO LUTION NO. 7, SERIES
#8, AS PRIORITY #4 . Ma yor Pro Te rn Ma nn
Upon a call of the rol l , the vo t e r es ul ted
Co uncil Members Weber, Mann .
Council Members Williams, Smith, Harper ,
Clayton.
Council Member Taylor.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the motion d e fe ated .
* * * * * *
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked if any Council me mbe r wanted
to sponsor Rough Draft #9 for a resolution supporting an appli-
cation requesting the construction of South Zun i Street from Dart-
mou th Ave nue to u.s. 285 as a project of regional s i gn i ficance,
No Cou nc i l me mber chose to sponsor the resolution.
* * * * * *
Ci ty Manager Mccown stated there was another cons i dera-
t i on f o r the Council on this matter and that would be Rough Draft
#10, Yale Street (Elati to Downing), City Manag e r Mccown stated
that this recommendation had no regional basis; but h e wanted to
br ing this to Council's attention.
Mayor Pro Tern Mann asked for a sponsor to Rough Draft
#10 . No Council member chose to sponsor #10.
* * * * * *
•
)
I •
-
(
C
•
January 30, 1978
Page 21
•
• •
There being no further buiness, the Mayor Pro Tern declared the meeting adjourned at 12:00 a.m.
r6~---eputy City Cler
•
I • •
n
b
•
•
• -
l 'IW POS ED STRtl::TS F OR PAVING Dl S 'J'HJCT #25
~0 0 -700 Eas t
:J .J~
(
Amh e rs t Pl ace (o v e rlny)
, ,)
C
~0 0 -600 We s t Bates Av e nue (Industria l)
r )
,
-v<lley East of 3700 South Broa dway (all e y)
I tJV /Ir(!<!.>~~ ... ~
L...)
._j /.') HJU ''/ I ',I ~ 1 f'V ti J-; )( ()
V"'l\lley East of 4000 South Broadway (alley)
(: ..A() "'.J i ::i.: ti,{ ,J. J
V
~lley Ea s t of 4700 South Broadway (alle y)
~ ,•
J'
'('000-100 East Centennial Av e nue (Residential)
vii900 Wes t Cornell Av e nue (Industrial)
-/c'
•
1
I • •
• -
• •
-2-
PROPOSE D STREET S FOR PAVIN G DI STRICT #25
3000 South Darlmouth Circle (o v e rlay )
~00 South De l a ware Stre e t (Re side ntia l)
'L ll' -..JU 1.1
~100 South Elati Street (overlay)
~000 South Fox Stree t (Residential)
I /J b
~000 So uth Galapa go Stree t (R es idential)
l 't t' .
~100 South Hu ron Street (R esidential)
• ~East Layton Av e nue (Residen tial)
) ,. I • •
• • In n
•
•
• -
-3-
P ROPOSl::D STRE ETS FOR P/\VING DI STRICT #25
400 East Layton /\v e nue (Residentia l)
,v{oo-aoo We st
J i 1 1' i •'
I ,, f •J~
I ,0 t ,, ,, •'
Oxford Av ~ue
I fl > 7_t..; f.,
I II I , /I
I ,,
(Reside ntial)
(
\I
4500 ~outh Pearl Stree t (ove rlay)
\/"'200 Wes t Pri n ceton Av e nue (Re sidential)
~00-300 East Princeton Avenue (Residential)
\;'2900 South Sh oshone Street (Special Industrial)
'i !'_/
A,
2900-300<\ South
..,t,Y
Umatil la Street (Special Industrial)
I
•
I • •
I n n
b
•
•
• •
-1-
PROPOSE D STRE E 'rS FOR PAVING DJ ST!UCT ff 2 5
00 0 -400 Ea s t Union Av nue (Re s id e nlia l)
/2900-3000 South Valle jo Stree t (Special Indu s trial )
~000 South Washington Stree t (o v er lay)
7 I . 1 -/;' I I ll l o.I\ 1-<..>.../lJ-V>'.JJ /J -1y_,.. V 0
~ l)).f\
'st Washington Circle ({~u.1
I)
J
f/1}· V
(ov e rlay)
\/' 2000-2300 West Wesley Av e nue (R esidential)
\J.1 (' ...
~
~0-3000 South Wyandot Street (Special Industrial)
I
•
I • •
In n
•
• -
PROPOSE D PA V ING DISTR ICT
• •
as:=::JII For Construction
~ Overlay
..... ----#
• , .. ,wu·,~.,. ...
//-lt -11
J U.I'.
I . •
•
•
• •
1 ·111 11 11 I J,,, IA\'t · ..... 111 ,;..1c1 ,m. ;,~
M•..;::: ·/.Y • t:•,v , r ,l;, r '1, l CJ 7 7
n·1 ~1J,;Y, n•i..c-:-.t.e:c J O, 1 ~1 1
\o,fu:.r~n;..y, ..J ar,u.3 r y 11. ) ~78
} 1-']0 J..Y, nnaur y 13 , )~i B
\.,'· o:;lSDAY, J anua r y 18 , 1 978
;::·~o .r..v, J ;.r,u ary 30, l S78
1":0:::;AY, Feb rua ry 6, 1 ~78
'"'-:..o ::LSDAY, F(.>bruary 8, 1 978
T UE.S DAY, F ebr u a ry 71, 1978
\,,T.D :n:soAY, ¥.arch 1, 1978
FPl DAY, March 31, 1978
MO:JDAY, Ap ril 3, 1978
MOl >DA Y, .\pril 3, l97S
..:o:m.a.v, Ap Til 10, 1978
T HUt-.SDAY, .l.p ril 13, 1978
THURSDAY, April 20, 1978
"'LO?>LSDA Y, Ap ril 2 6, 1978
f\"'E!>h"!.SOAY, Ap ril 26, 1978
t:O:lOAY, May 1, 1978
\,,,"i:Dl ~SDAY, May 3, 1978
MQ';::)Ay , ~ay 15 , 1 978
Tt tt:.S OAY, Jolay 16, 1978
lo."ED ~:ESOAY, ~ay 17, l :t78
7Hl:'P.EDAY, J u n e l S , l 978
r..:ESDAY, Sepu -.he r 12, 1978
F..r.x/)do
ll -lS-77
1 ist o f !->lT C'1·t s .,v11 il <Jb }e f u r C c,·.JnC l l
SP ]f:'c t.i 119 f i rrn !o r f 1 ... a l ·~(·r vjt·c s cH,~ l«,1,d
h.lr.d l i n g
Con!'i d ,•r 1<.~o }ut i o n o f ir,t<.n t t o !0 1m 1"0 \0 1n 9
Oi bl ri c t 1;0. 2 S.
r i rs t p u bli c a ti o n o ! J.:o t ice
r:a i l n o ti c e o f i r.c l usion i n Oisttict a r,d p ub-
lic h C'adng t o 1111 a ff e c t ~·d prOj ·t"l·ty o -..:ne r s.
Secon d publi c ati o n o f no t ice
Th ird p u b l i cat i o n of no ti c e
P u blic h e ar.ing on f orn.a ti on o f Dls t rict (Spe -
cJa l ~tg.) @ 7 : 30 p.m.
I n tr o duction of a bil l for a n o r d1nance
c reating the District
P ubli c ation o r b i ll f or o rd inance
rinal r e ad i ng of b i ll for ordi n a nce; p ublic
h ea r i n g on f ina l pa s s a ge o f ordi n ance
Publish as •n or d 1na nce.
Ordina nce in full f o rce and e ffect
Curb, gutter, sice ... ·alk permJ t cut -off date
Notice t.o contrac t o r s, and bond s ale aut h o dzed
Pub] i sh first not i c e to contr•c t o rs and bond
houses.
Plans and Speci fi c a tjons avai ]able
Sec o nd notice t.o contractors and bond h ouses
Third notice to contra ctors and bond houses
Final date for pr1vate c onc r et e Cons t.
Open con struc ti on bids at 2 :00 p .a,.
Open bond bids; fl 2:00 p .m.; ll\.ard c o ntra c t;
introduce bill for ordinanc e t.o i s s ue and
sell bonds {bonds dated June 1st.).
Publication of bil l to sell bonds
Passage o! ordi n ance on final reading
!:s t. date of start o! construction
Publish as an o rdi nance foll o wing fi nal pas s a ge.
Ordinance in full effect -Proc eeds of bon ds
rec e i ved
Est. date of co:-,p leti on of proJ ect
•
. ~~·
·1
I • •
n
•
•
•
,· •
City of f:nglewood
------------
3400 S Flali S1r ee1 Januar y 13, 1978 Englewood.Co l o ,adoeo110
Phone (303) 76 1·1140
Dea r Engl e wood Citi ze n:
The City Council has adopt e d a r e solution d e scribing the
City's intent to form Paving District No. 25. This District
will be form e d for the purpose of construction and improving
cu rbs, sid e walks, and paving on c e rtain streets and alleys in
y o ur n e ighborhood and throughout the City during the surruner of
1978. The cost for such improve ments will be assessed against
the property to be benefitted by these improvements.
Your property will be affe cted by these improvements, and we
invite you to review the attache d resolution. You may have
s., or will ·see, markings on your curbs, sidewalks or trees
that are sch e duled for r e moval. There are times during the
course of construction that changes in removal quantities may
have to be made.
May we request that you make any i nquiries regarding the Paving
Di s t rict by calling our Engineering staff at City Hall, 761-1140,
Ext. 220.
You are invited to attend a public h e aring on the formation of
this Paving District on January 30, 1978, at 7:30 o'clock p.m.
in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, 3400 South Elati
Stre et. At this hearing, you will be invited to make any com-
me nts, pro or con, regarding the improvment of streets, the cost
of which would affect your property. ·
Sin ce rely,
Z.~~~P.E.
Director of Public Works
KW/lo
Attachs .
•
I • •
•
•
• -
, ... _. ·.· ... •• ··--'""';.. ... _ ... _ ... ·,!---• : __ ;: •• ..:.:.~ ••. • I"-••,: .,, • ,,.-~' :.";,. -~ '•
, ..
•,,.
: • oJ
Sl'R J_J:S 197_1! .... , . 't.
·· ... ]\ RE SOLUT J Ol l DF:CL1,RJIIG HE JI TU T l Oll OF TH E . . · .. , .•. · ...
\ . ~· ·. ,:.,. ... :··
Cl'I"'i COUUC JL OP cr:GLl:llOOO , 01 .. 0 RADO , ·r o CHSJ\T.P! · ·.-·· .. ~ :. -..~ . .::· · .. ~_±.~
A SPf:CTI\L l MPROVfJ ,E NT DJ STRIC".l' I N T JIP. C I "I"l1 T O •
BE · DESIG NA TE D J..S PJ,VJN G DISTR I C T 110. 2 5 • .-r . .-_;;~:·. '.:. ::~·,· ,• .· .. :
MXlPTTI IG DETAILS MID SP J:C ll"I ChTIOtl S FOR TH B .....
PJ<OPOS ED DISTR I <:T, h ll D OR DERING PUBL I CJ..TJ ON .. •' ·:-"!.··
h);D l'.AlLING OF 11o·r JCE 00F Hf'J ,RlllG T O TH E Ohl lER S . • • '' ."
OF T HE Pl'O?ER T Y T O BE ;,ssE SSE D 1·0 R I MPROVE..":ENT S · .. •
. lN SA ID DI ST RICT .. . .:. '."
WH ERF..II S , 1.h c C ity Counc il o f En gl ewoo d, Co l ora"d o ,.
ha s '3c t errn 1 ne d th a t it is nc cess ~ry to cre <!it e A 6pe c ia l i 1n_9 ro v c-::_.
r.ie nt d i s ldct· wi th in the City, f o r the pur pos e o f cons t r uc'.in J
and installi n g stree t pavi n g, cu rb a n d 9u tt e r ,i ;1d ,sidc 1Jalk · ic-
proveme nts, togelhe ~ ~it.h ~ecess ary in ci ~en tals, o n c e rte!D ·
s t ree ts an d a v enu e s as se t f orth in this r e s o l u ti o n, an~ to ·
..,·s s cs a the c os t of the . i mproveme nts aga i ns t th e p rop~rty
specia lly bene fit e d b y .the i mprovemen ts an d incl ud~d within
the district, and
· h~EREA S, p ursua nt to the Charter of the City and
Chap ter 14 of Uie 1-'lunicipa i. Co db llt . Hi lo t:Hy, the _city Coun;,il
has d etermined to .construct a n d in s tall such improv em ents,
p r ovided h o~eve r, th at the City Cowicil ·shali consider all
pro t e sts and objecti on s that ma y be made in connect ion with th e
proposed i mprov~ments, b efore ordering the constructi on th creof1
and
nnER.F..AS . pursuan t t o an ~~~er of th e city Council; th~
Engineer of the City for the propose d spe cial i mproveme nt pro-
ject has prepared an d filed preli minary plans, specifi c a tio~•,
est i mates of cost, maps and sch e dules for th~ propo sed im-
provernentsr
BE IT RESOLVE D Bl1 THE ClTl1 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
I
E NGLEWOOD, COLORADO&
1. That the City Council has determined the.re exists
a necessity !or the construction and installation o( the street
paving, curb an d gutter and sidewalk i mpr ove~~nts, t o gether with
n ecess ary incid e ntals, on those st;eets and av e nues ·,·hich are
mo re particula r ly set forth in the ~otic e of he~rin g, and to
create a s pecial i mpr o vemen t district for such purpose. ··
2. That the Engineer's reports, together with the
prelimi nary details, specifications , estimates of cost, maps
and schedules prepare d an d f i l e d wi th the City Clerk .be and
the same are hereby a pproved an d adopt ed by the City Council
for u s e in the construction an d i ns;ella tion of the i mprovemen ts
t o be mo de in said i rr,prove ment di stri ct.
-1 -
•
. •
· .... ;
: ~.
I • •
•
•
• •
: .... · .. .... -· .,· ...... . : .,· ,:· < •.
r .r L \· .. ~ t..._1...·._· t · ._. :; .... , ... :.. -~ -~:. tlt ..
·' --: -...... ,_
). Tha t nz..l £:ri.'lls to be ,i~cd in ~on~t1·uc:tln 9 .-.n d
._";, • ,.._ r
. ,...,.._
. ' . :.:.: in sl~lll n g l110 p1·oposc_d i mproveme nts l'lre r.t;,l.-!d ln the J:o lj c e
: :··;. h ere in a ft e r :;.et !orth. · · • •, · · · ""·
4. Thll t the a !i!;c =;:;r.ic nls lo b e ' l e:vic d l!9°r...: ~s ~ ~~ \·.~· .. ·._ ~,_: ~:.' :·:-:..;
prope r ly to b e l nc l u~e d -,.,ilhl n th e d i s t r".!c t, f o r :,e id i ~ ro·.·e-,,:· .• :· ,:._:~·:.
me nt$1 s h3l l be due nn d p a y ab le ,:ithl n t.hirly days !,o m rn d · ·, -~---.·
~ .:. ~' : .e.!te r the f!n11.'l pub] 'i ca lio ~ of t.hC:,orcBnnn c e .r..s sc ss ln9 t he \,:ho l e ·
ac t ua l c os t b f sai d i n rov r ~c nls ~sa i n st t he re3 l p1 o~c 1ly i n
s~ld di strict, provi~e d, ho~ev~r, lh~~ any owne r wh o s h~l l p~y
t}i c e nti r e ~oun t o! l h e ~s se$~~cn t wi thi n r-o id period o f t !~c ,·
s hall b e en t\~lcd to ~n ~1 1o~ance of S\ of U,e · a~oun t o! t h a
~s:;essD"le nt •. In tl,e e ve nt r-':ly c · . .-ner of rea l es tJ!.te sh nll !oil
t o pay t h e whole of such asscs sne n t a,;;a i ns t his property . ,d hi n
so ld t hirty · clays, the n th e whole . cos t o f sa id i mp;ovc men t.a 6 0 .
l!ssc ss ed against his property sh~ll b e p ayable in ten (10).
equ al annual installments of i!S sessme nts. The int eres t rate"·
on the unpaid in s tall me nts ~f a ssessmen ts will be estab li s hed
by ordinance to be :"clopted b y tl,e-,-; t y Counc il at a l.ater elate.
The fir&t of said i ns ta l l me nts of principal an d ·int e rc&t shall .
be due and pey.able at &u c h ti me "s may be cletenn1ned iri end
by the a s 6essment ord ina nc e, en d th e rema in~er of the ennual
installments of princlpal "nd interes t shal l be d~e and payable
&uccessively o~ the s ane cla y i n each y e ar therea fter until aiO ·
are p aid in full •.
5. That the property to be assessed for &aid~
provernen ts shall be the property r;pecially b e nefited by r;aid.
i mprovements and incl ude d within the i mpr oveme nt district ,
Lnd mo re p~rticul a rly describe d in the 1;o tice h erein after se t
forth.
6. That th e re s hall be prepared an 9rdinenc e
creating within the corporate l im its of the City, a _sp ecial
i mpr ov err.ent ~i~trict to b e kno'wn as rav ing Di s trict No. 25,
providing for the construction ~n d insta l lation o! the j rnprovc-
~ent s, a ll a5 ~escribcd i n ~h is Resolut5on , en d -~n ~cco r ~e nc e
~1th th e pre li mi nery repo rt, plans, ~aps , s pe cifications, d etei ls
an d estima tes of c os ts of the Enginee r, herein referred to an d
now on file in the office of t he Director of Public Works.
Th e propose d ordi nance will be cons ide red !or passage on fi rs t
r eedin g by the City Counci l at a regular meet ing thereof t o be
held o n February 6, 1978.
-2 -
•• • I .•
•
, ,
·,
'
I • •
•
\ •
. •.· .· . ..., ...... . :a ':'.,_.., -. •··
·.•, ·.
.... . ---
•
• •
;-.. ,·. : ....
;.. .: : .. ::
'-..
·!, "··. ~-. .· .. : ' ~ ·./.:_::-{'._
·· · the dlslri;~ ~~:~~c c c o;.,~:;/:::1:~c ~c:r ~~=lt 0 ;o~h:h :::,.~:.:~/f._ >, ~:\::/ __ ~<
i n t h e J:ng)cw6od ltc r <"l d ~cn tinc l, a nt;w~p3 p<!r o ! 9cncro1 /:-:: :.:=·"~-:.~:[.-·; .~:;~~<~
cJrcul.').tion in lhc City. ln "?.d ition°,.ft copy o ( .. such noll·c ~ .. -. .-:\·:~"_;-~:./,::':;' .. '
!;]1.-,11 h«? T.'la ilcd , os l ,~g c pre zd d , lo c.!0 c h Y.no·.:n o ·..:nc r 'of ~ .. ·.:.·~--':;,:··~~ ·}:;~ ·.·.
rea l .pro c r ly Yilhln le p:-opo!H·~ dii.lric t. ·· :··."·:._ 1;,, ... ~." .. ).'~·~ ..... :.:~·~:.
i ·-; The pu~lishc d no tl o $h all b o i n .r;ubs l,.ntially ··,.,:.~:·.-:f . .-·.'.:, ' •,
:,. ~ · .. th, foll o wJng !orc r . ' :... :.· ,:··: .··~ }. :: ... ~.i~\~-."-
-·:..
·~
-; .....
;-'·-· ...
. ; ..... . , ·
.'c. ....
'· .. •
.
·,. :;~·-.:~.:.
•,.
-===-----
' . ,.
··· ..
,,. .. ,_ .. ,
. ·.:\·.
l -
•
. ..
-...
., : .
'
. ' . . :, .
I • •
I r:i ,...,
-
•
... •: ..
•
• •
•,"-,.; I . _;_. .... ~ ';. .... : :. : ..,: ·:.:
. ,.· ... '· .
4 ;: •••• -··~ ! ,:
L, • ,: • t . ·-~ ;r-
OF ·rHE JNTCUTl OH T O C REA1':e 1\ P E C Jl,i J J:PI\OV C-. ·. · :~·~.: ,, • ,
1
~!:.; .-.. ,
1:0 ;-r 01 s · RJCT J ti U IGL L •:ooo, C Olf.lJ J , , T O H E . '°, ·.· !· .; •· ..... ·. . ·
)\?:QKU AS PJ..VIfJG DJ S R Jc·r 1;0 . 2S , I O R JH C PU R -: .·:~t '..·· ; • .:'· ... :·.;._:'·.:Y 1
PO S E or c o :1 s -n,u C-rlllG 1,1:0 n :ST A l,LJ :>G S T n E ET : ;, ). · ·~· '·. ·, .-. ·:,._
rJ\VlSG , UR D )\t:o ,ll 'i'T) ~ J,r:o $)1)};}:J,L K IH?fi:OVE~-·-.;:4·_; • ·: ... ~ .. :.;.-_:::.· •
~E !:rs , T O G ET HER WJTH },t.cc :..~J\R Y IN CI O L-r:"!'.A L S, :, · · ...... :,•,. -.:•· .·
O N }'RTAI!~ STR ECT S JJ~O h ':i:!JUE S "iH LRC U1 1 ;,r;O . . _.;j·'.;f .. : .~:;-_:;
OY 1\ PU ALI C li:c.ARIHG THf.'J.LO:f . ' ;. ·. -~•:·~ • r:·.,·.•·
II O T I C & ----.
·: ~
. . . . . · .. -· ·-:":' ' .. "•·>~·;>~:-(:.'·~·::·:,
... ·· :. Al l ow :1 ,~r s o f rc,.,1 e !i l R te ~:1 d p r cp c r ly l.cr cin "!tcr."";• ·· :·~· /. ;_. ·
r!cscrib d , a~d ,,11 pc:.-t.onS 9 n crc1t l ~, r..r e 11e rcby notifie d thl\t . ·;:•·_:: .·,:.·:.·
the City Counc il .of Englewoo d , Co l o rado , ursuan t ~o i t s ~ .:c
c ,•n orler has adopted prclininary o e t~ils , ple n s e.nd 6peci!i -··.
c ~t1ons _!or c ons tru ct io~ of s tr c~t paving , curb en d gutter :
,_n d s id e.,all< i mp,·o ve :c.cn ts , in e..n d f o r a prcpcsc d speci a l ,iC,:..'
ro ,·er.,en t di s _trict -..,ilh_in th e c o rpo ra te li mit& o f Cngle\.'Ood , :
ColOra do , to b e ~nown a s Paving Di s trict Ho. _2 ~. Sa id ·
.·· pers on s ar e furthe r _ notifie d as fol l0'-'6 t
(A) Th e .1 TJprovemc nts t o b e constructed or . . .. . .
•;·-:a'.'..~!,:,~t.Allc4 ere as follo.:e i t-:<-,,::)_ ... _-: :,\_..·.~!-··~}:§~~~
·.;~-~~·:.... ·' ·f:·: Neces sary grading an~· ~x c~a,·a~io.n ; ·p~~i~-~ \,,)1f h . 6~ ·cC:mp~C;ed
~ gr~yel base course and 2 ~ e s ph altic concr ete surface, con -
crete \.•alk!I , c ur b and gutter ,,,here not alre ady in5tal l e d 1
toge ther with appurt e nances an d incidentals on the f ollow-
ing streets and avenue s:
~-
Eas t Centen ni al Ave .
Sou th Delaware St .
South fox S t ,
South Galapag o St,
South Huron St .
Eas t Layt o n Ave .
East Layton Ave.
Kes t Oxford Av e.
We st Princeton 11,v e.
Eas t Pri ncet on hve.
r:ast Union hve .
Fest t-:e s lcy J.ive .
Eas t side of South
Broach,ay
Sou th 6ic3e of \.\es t
·'Eastman Ave.
South side of 1-:e st
Cor:1cl l hv e.
North si de of t:cs t
Oxford i .ve.
!'Jorth sid e of l\'e &t
Princeton J\ve.
East. side of South
Li ncoln St.
!:est 6ide of South
Logan St.
\.:est siCe of South
lnca St.
\.:est sic!e o! South
BannocT. St.
r:~st s ide of S o'-l t h
Lincoln St.
East side of South
B:-c a c!-...·ar
r:est Lic!e cf Sou t h
'.: jon St.
_,_
•
(6 6 f e et eist of th e ·
E . side of s .... Bd•-y.
North 6ide o f ~est
Floyd Av e.
~orth sid e o! hes t
Dc?rt..r.1outh Ave.
2 75 feet north of N.
side o! ~. Oxford Ave .
(0 0 feet N . of north
side of W. Princeton Ave.
West sid e of South
Sherman St.
West side o! South
Pennsyl \'ani e S t.
~est side of South
Fox St .
!:est 6!de of South
Ch e rokee St.
\,:es t. sj de' of So u t h
L::>sa n S t .
West side o f South
Pennsy l van ia St .
East 6i de of South
Zuni S t.
I
I • •
In n
•
,, ·:-
:
.. ·
•
• -
....... ., ,:: . •: -.
_;:.I ,
. 2.
·>· ~-;· / ·~~
1:,·ct:~r .. 11 y IJT,,'1in9 ;,n d <'xc:~1 ,·...i ti n n , J...-1 vi1,g ""'ilh 8 " co:-.4 iL Le d . .
f]J'OV C'l ,15c court.e .-ind 3 • ;1•1,l iAllJc conc rete our f ac e ,11 1 rox i-.:'1
••••
r ,a lC"ly .;• f r->ct .i n widt h, c c.n c i <:le w;,,lY.&, cur b b11 d gu tt e r
t,,;'es t
h e s t
S ou th
South
South
South
"'" c·re no t alr c.a d y J ntt<1 l lcd 1 t o,J c lh t r with appur t cn ,1.ncc • .· ·.,
and inci d en l ~ls o n the foll ow ing al re~ta nnd aven ue &&
ON
Fales hve: ;
. .
Corne ll Ave .
,~i:91
E 1t st ~d~e o f
Dc l e ...,•a re S t •
E a s t side of
Sho !.h o ne S t.
S ou t h
Soulh
T O
Ces t si~e o f Sou l h -~
Ga l a atJ O S t.
~as t &i de o f Sou t h .
T c j o n S t.
., . .. ·.
3. Nc.-c es s ary 9rading end e:xc.3 vat i o n, p ·a vi n g ... it h s• cc:-p a c t e d :• ··
gr a vP l b as e c ourse and 3• ~sph<ic con c rete s ur f a c e ap 1cx 1 ~
mate ly 34 f ee t in width, 4 -{oo t -wid e c o~cre t e ~v · an s,
togethe r '""ith a.ppurtcn an ces an d incid ental& o n t h e !o )J c ..,dn 9 .· '.;·'O:.
streets and av enuc as
ON fRO!_! ·r o
Shoshone St. South sid e of Wes t 1'orth side of We s t
Bates Ave. Oornell J..ve .
Ur:1ati l la St. South siee of West ?;orth side of We at
Bates .Ave. Dart.mouth Aven ue
Va 11 ej o St. South side o f Wes t North sid" of We st
Bat.es Ji.ve . Dar t.mou th Ave •
Wyandot St. S o uth &ide of n e st Nort h side of nest
B~tes J..v e .. Dartmouth Ave.
···-·· --·. -.. ------·----4 .. Ne ce ssary prepa ration of presen t surface, instal latjon of po ly-
propylene fabric, over laying of same with one-inch aspha ltic
conc rete, and c o ncre te ""'all\,!, c ur b s , and gutters, where n ot
presently adeq ua te; tog e h '1 with appurtenance s and othe r incl-
. ___ de n;.!] ~or!_C?n. th~-f.o! ]_Q_w.i _£1 q ~t _ree ts_ll nd_ a venu ~:
ON FRO M TO
East hroherst Place East side of South
Pennsylvanj a St .
Wes t 6ld" of South
Clzrk.son 6t . '
tes t Dart.Inouth Circle
South Elati St.
South Pearl St.
South Washington St .
~orth sid" of 2100
East Dar t~outh Ave.
South sid e of ~e s t
Oxford .hv e.
South siC e o! E es t
Sta nford Ave.
South si de of E a st
Gr~nd ~ve.
~o rth 5Jde of 22 00
East Dart...,.outh Ave.
~orth 6ide of nest
Pr ince ton Ave .
North side o! t:as t
Tufts Ave .
North side o! E~s t
Bellev i e\,,,' 1.ve.
South Washington Circle ne s t side of South WeSt Eide of South
,.11 ey
South
hlley
Sou th
hlley
South
~:ashin5ton St. (h pproxi-We~hin9ton St. (Approx i-
mately 5010 south) rnetel y SOSO south)
S. t:ec essa ry grading and excavat ion, c ompac ted sub gra~e, end w ith
6" Portland ce~ent con cre te 5ur !nc e, for a t o ta l over all width
of fourte e n feet; together wi ~h a~p ur~e n a nc es and o t her inci-
de n ta l work on ~he !ollo~ing alleys :
ON f"R0!-1 T O
E. of 3700 Blk. South 6.ide of J:a st llorth sJ<!e of Ea•t
Broad'"'·ay Ke n yon Av e. Leh i gh Ave.
E. of 4000 Blk. ~out.h 1d de o f East ~lorth side of Eeat
Broad\,,,·a y J:a66AU 1've. Ox ford Ave.
E. of 000 illk . S o uth Fiide of Eest 1:orth rdde of E:a&t
Broadway Union 1've. Layton ~ve.
-5-
•
I • •
-
•
•
• •
·"' :>l .. ,' .. ~
.... ,
. t' . ............. "'~· -.... -..
{b ) Th e c!c•!11.:r j p tJ o n of the r,r e,io=..rd cH t~l r i c t, r.r.d U ,c prc,p:·. :> .. ·· · :,,
,•rly to be c !i!,t:h 'it:d , .. d th t.hc coo:;t o f the j :·piovc,"H.:n to 6h t'11 L e ~ll o ~ •
t.hc n .•a l r ,r cpl'1 ly f r on tj n g or n l.,u tti n g o n llic 1.,t 1 ce:l& t1n d 11 ll c r 5 Lc·t·~·1.:c n :·· .. ··
t. ,c l l·t r-in i l ic r einL "'f ore ~csc riL c>d , j n clud l n g U ic rt·n l pr ope rty wit hi n .... ; .
enc-h a l f (1 /2 ) bl o c)c o { Fu c h !;trC'r D o r,d l!])c ye. ;,d j u !l t.r1H~·n t e f o r th e .' ;i.
ar:ce,~c nt o ! cot ts will b e n ~e f o r J rr cg u l n r hn d o ~d -nh apc d l o tu n n o · ~~-:
p l.l r ce l a o f r.,r opc rty. · ~ .
Cc) The probll ble t o te l co6 t o f the J i·,p r o v cmc nt s lo e c o n -
s truc t ~d and installed is ~l,OS 0,10 0 •
. • .·.
. ~ (dl Th e p r oba b le amoun t o f the t o ta l c o s t whic h the City
sh all p a y ls app roxl ;,:ate ly S203 , ~ 0 0. . ' .·.' :.
~·
(e) ·The b a l anc e o f the t o t ~l c o s t wh l c h I s no t p a l d b y the
C lty of E n glewood will be ••sesnPd ag~l ~I s t th~ p r c p c r ty sp ec iall y b on e -·
f iled b y the i mprove ;:"';e nts , end i nclu e d ,,.-ith i n tt.e Dist.ric t. P ro b a b le
co s t , f e r fro n t f oot f o r s ai d i r ;,1 o v c:-c n ts a:-e as !"c,ll o -..·:o;:1
J,s ph alt pa vlng on street s 36' wi d e (6 and 2) $]5.6 6 pe r fron t f oot
:.ep:-ia lt paving o n street s U' ,.;i d e (8 u.n d 3) $2 7.3 3 p er fr on t f oo t
~.s p ha 1 t pavi ng o n streets 34' wide (8 an d 3) S20 .5 3 pe r f ron t f oo t
1• ~sph alt over l a y paving o n s treet s 3 6' wide $ 6.60 pe r front f o ot
Concr ete alley paving 14 '. wide $17.82 p er front foot
P av ing of other widths s hall be in proportion to the a bove estimate:·~
4• thick curbwalk -Type I $11.93 pe r front f oo t ,. thick curbwalk -Type II ~12.lS per f ron t !o ot
Vertical curb a n d gutter $ 7.88 per fron t foot
Slde,•allt 4' wl (l e $ 8.40 pe r fr on t f o ot ,. thick concrete •lab $ 2.78 pe r squa re foot
4' wide c on crete •v• Pan Sl2.60 per f ron t foo t
.. ···I '.
I
I
I .,
' ., All estimates exclude the six percent (Et) for inspect ion, col-,
lec:tion, incidental, ,end .interest a s prov.i ded b y !a"'• ·
The costs of pav ing to be c o ns tructe d e 1 on g the side s of corn~r
l o t s w i thi n said OJstri ct &hall be a s se~sed ~e~i ~s t p ro pe rt ie s ~ith in
o n e -half (1/2) bloc k, or 300' of uc h in~erEc cticn 5 ~nd c o r~e r lots,
~~icheve r is smel ler, on a zone h ~bi s in e c cc:~8 nc e ~i th ~enef its con-
f erred on 6uch p r ope rties.
Each one -half (1/2) b locr., or 3 00' cection , wi ll be divided
i n to six (6) parallel zo~es e n d a s ce s ~~ent s will be on Lhe fol)o~ing
be si •:
•
I • •
•
... ..
•
• •
,. ···; ...
.,. ...... ,._ .:· .
•
·::.
. ,
. ,:,
,: ·'
... l . .-: ... :; .::.,.'_ •.
.l ·,t 7 on c abult J n 9 o n Gtrcc t ' .·• • · ·,\ ....
o ,: 11v c nu o .••.•...••..•.•• ." ••.. :.,e.55 1 ..... • · 1···--~
'.'::: :::: '.:::: •••••••• : ••• : : : •••• : : :: :· ' ,) }:'.;)t_ii_,
.. ·· ..
. . .... ·--..
:· i,:-. ·;-: ~ .' ..:.~ = .. ,· ,;e x t Zon e ................. :::·.::.;·:.··1'1.291
'~:\:: ',· ... :::-·::..\.; 1:cx t Zo nr>_::··~_.·: ....... .' .. _ .. .".· .... 14.29 1 · · .... ·· ·;·· · ~
{(/'/.:-::.:.-_.,.
0
1:ex t ion~:.~ .• • ..•.•.• : .• ·.: .': .·: ••. f 4~~9 ~ . , ·: \::{~:\::\\:;·;'..-/t' ·:... .·; :.·.:, '.;.: .... >~· "i'O'rl,.Jh ,,,l OOI .
, ............ . . . No ·~sses:;:-.,:n ts will be rr.~~e f o r cu r b s, gut t er s l'.ln d .•. -:·, ....
eidcw11ilk e in place 'k·~ich con f orrw ""'i th th e p l a ns .and r.p ec iC.i c a.t .i on • r·.:·· ·
!or the pro po sf:?d improv e men t s l!n d. ,,.-h j c h "re cc c epteble _to th e . ·
City E ngine e r •.
Th e e<>G t of i mp rovin g •trcc t, AVcnue ~n d nllcy in ter-.
&t c ti o n.a U,r o ughou t t he Dio t rict , en d o ! 'pa vi n g in c xc eo a of 36' ·. · .· ... ·-..... . .. -.. . -.-··· ............... -.·· ·----~
.: " widths an d 8" thi c k n es s on s t ree ts d e signated as ar teri al or co ll ector .... · .
. ,'! .: '"''ith i n r e gidenti11 l z oning aa of Jan ua ry 3, 197 8, '"''i ll be paid by the ." · .i .... ~,
;•. , City o f En gl ewood. . . · . · •·,
···:.:::·-;-·. -· ••
4
.' Prope rty O\o'n era a r e i;peci!ic ally re ferred to tlie ach edu ]e '.·:.~:~·
· ·.· of p ropo sed a s•es s men ti; ,..hi c h \Jil l 15 il o n file in the Of fi c e of the · ··
Directo r o ! P ub lic \;orlcs, !roro '-hi ch th e opprox l rn ate a mo u nt t .o be .",'._·_.-•.
e sscss ed -a g a i n s t <>ny ,particu lar lot or .p';'rce l or pr_opcrty . rna y be .. : . . _.. determine d. ·
Upon comp l et i o n o f s ai d i ~proveme nts, or aa s oon e s the
tot al c o st Ui ereof is de f inite ly ascert aine d, such cos t s hall be
epp ort!one~~o th e property in the District. Notice of such ep-
p o rti onrnenCha ll be give n a n d a Hearing will be held prior t o Ula
edo ption or-lUI ordin~nce l!~sessing s uch cost, ell a6 p rov ided by
la"• . . . · . , · . . .
(f) . Sai d as sessme nts will be d u e en d pa y eb le withou t
d emand wit.hin thi r ty days f rom An d after the f in al p ub lication of ~n o rd J nence l!s scss ing the ""'hole cost of sai cS i mprov eme nts a9,1dns t
t he real p rop e rty i n eid Di s t ri ct, provi<l e d ,' h o ,:eve r, that eny
o·.•ner -.·h o shal l pay th,. fu ll e ss e ssmen t "i t.h in sai d period of
thirty d ay s shall be e n title d t o ~n allowanc e o f five percen t (St ).
In t.he event tha t any owner of re al prop .. rty sha ll !ail to pay
the whole of s uch as sessment bga i n s t th e proper ty wi thi n s aid
thirty · clays , then the whole cos t o! sa id i mpr ovemen t . s o ass ess ed
aga inst t.he property s hal l be pay ab le in te n e~ual ennual in-·
ste llrr,ent• of pri ncipal. T n c f irs t of s \lch i n s t allme nts of
principa l sh all be due an d peyabl,.,at s u c h time as may be det er111in ed
in ~n d by t h e ~sses sing ordin~nce , ~n d the r c~ainder of sai d
ins tall r,e nts t.herea fter u n til all ~=-e pei d in full;,. The ·rete
of inter e st to be pa id on unpaid nn d d e f e rre d installments "i ll
be establi shed by ordinance to b,. adopte d by the City Council .
et a l ater ~ate.
(9) A F.e arin 9 on th,. cre a tion of the District
vill be hel d b y t.he Counci l on Y.o n d ey , the 30th day of January,
1 9 78, at 7 :i O o'cl ock P .tl. ,· at th e City Hell in E n glewood. A .
pub lic hearing sh all b,. held prior to th e fi na l passa9,. of such .·
ord in ~nce , at t.he regular ·me etin g at 7 :J O P.H. on Tue sday.
Fe~rue ry 21, 1978.
7 -
-----------·--·-·-·-
•
' ' I • •
-
;
•
•
• •
.. .. ""'\. ... __ o-4 •• . : .. ...
l ., •. . .
3 ...... , •.
'. ·:·.· .. ··\.:
,;·. ; ,··.:· ·::. .... _.:. -. ,·
! _}:·· ; ' ; : ·. < ·~··. . . ·. . . . ... · :·,· r.-..... :·"'
. . Ch ) l\n y p cr:;on ·,~c!. i r lri 9 to l>c l 1Cl\t'd up o n t h e • ~. · :· • ,/,:" · : .. ·:
.. · .. i ~.:;u e o f the crr-,t!o n o f the d!r.tric t or 11 ,n n tho con,,L ruct!o n~ /:'·~:;-;.~ ...... ..:.~<
i n!.t a l l at J o n o r 1 mp.rov cr.ic nt o! the i ~p r o v(·:n c n l~. i nvolved , J:r,o y , ·;y . · : ·.~.--·~.
. t~ppca r a t t.h c tl ir,e: t1n d pl ~c c .:.e t f o r the p ub lic h cAring llll·n .:o n. ;-._'.~ 1.,.! -!
·:·· :'·. :or tha t p urpos e.. ., ... •.. .· .. . ... " -.. , ?· '.:·.-~<}· .. :,'.:'.~·\
. . (i) A r..a p , cst 1 ri c'llc an d &C c"ule E>l10\.l in9 th • · ··:...,: .. ~·;;:., "• .
.)pprox i mate l\.moun t t o be I\S~<:~!ic d ,, ~n d 111 1 .rc:.o l\Jti on s l'.n d . ·. ~ ·. :', -. •".: · ....
proceedings will be e n file an d c11 n be scC"n .-.n d c x;,,,tn i nc d b y '·. -.:._:·.'!;. :-.. -;i ·;
ttny per s o n i ntere sted a t the Office of l h c Director o! l'ubllc ··.· '·.··: ..... ·.i :;.
J-:o=):s 11 t any tir:e· duri n g bur.i nc~& hou r i. o n o r prior t.o Lh e ·;;~· , . ." -":t-·. :. ,. <l<.le o f hca dn9. ·
Da t e d t h e '3rd.d a y of J anuary , 19711.
S E A L
Pub lish int Eng l ewood Jler ald-Sen t ine1
Pu!>H s h o n, :Janua ry ·l .'t, 1~ Md 2~, 1,1,.
,;:'_ .. :~-· ... ~
. . "; . ··-.. ,! ... ,' ~:·.-... · -..... . ~·: ... ~ ......
··:.
,.· ...
W. Ja.1<e a ·. .
0·1·cclor ot'"Finance
J:n g 1 c'woo d, Co l or a d o :~··~-
.... :.
. ··-:· -··· ..
:,.. ... •;.
• _:"·;, ·~ • I•
::.·:-· ...
. ~ .. . . . . . -· _; . .·.-. :• .
·, ,·.
~ . . ; .
• T·.: i .
.,
.. i-. -· . .... .. ,• ..• -.
:.: .. .. .... _.; .. _
.. .
··_.·;· ....
-I
·----·-·-·-----·--. ·-·---·-
•
, .
·'
. .,; .
I • •
•
•
• •
. -...
> ·: :-"' .... ~v ~-; .. :~
. ·, l .' .. , ...... ___ ;
.. · ... ~ .:'_-·~ -~·~ . ;· .. . ,. !';
.;:~.:~\ ·, ~-~·~~:{
,• ..... .
. •., ·:.;,
...
e. 1\ copy or . tl1c no ti c e \,,/hl~h wi ll 0bc pub li r;.hccS :, ---... ~-··:f··::..";~ ...
... _.:.•: .. s hal l 1'l r.o be m-,il c d to cbch p rop e r ty owne r t.o be ln c l u~~d · ' ... :.~~t ·._' '·: : ... ; ..
:·.:witl,ln· the dl ;.trl ~t a nd '-ho wl 11 be .,,;~c~G c d wilh the coc t " o!. ',;<.\ · ·~-c
·-~:···.: .. the lrwprov c~c nts. · .. ;· ·." ·:·. : · ·,· .·.·~ ~-~ ,:_.: · · ·"'·:-.:~~:.~:::·{:· ·,~:~::jJ~·-,!;-·}
~':t ·."·':. ,. Shou ld a ny one _O r ~m o re r:.cC't!on o o r p1.o vi ~J o ns of · ·{.··· · .;.!;.":~
lhis J;c,olut!on b e j udic ially d eterm i ne d i nvali d or \l nc nforcc r.b le;--;;;.-.\ ~
s uch lcte nn!.nat!.on sh ~ll not .. rrc ct, 1 :np~·!.r ~r !nva lS.d a tc t'ha ''~ ._:·. · .. ':,:-;l?-} ·-. ' .... ,-.:~ ;...; ......
·~ rc ;n ~Jning provl s l on s h ereo f, the ir,t c ntl o n being !:J,at lh e · · · :.;· .• ·.->· ·:· .. , j/: '/.v ,.rious provi s i on s h e r e of "re· £c•,er,;ble. ·· -,,·.:/'· .; .~'.:::
··-•;':. J..DOPTEO AN O J\PPROVEO This 3r,t day of J1>n uory,. 197j. ,: .·' .,
,._ · ..
q" ••
: .. •·
-.;.
. .: .· ...
: ..
. ..,
(SEAL)
•. .,
1'TTEST1
·:.
. .: .
·--:.
f . .. ·.,
-.. . ·:-....
..... ·
.. , :,., ....
•'\.
:~· ·.. ~"~}2\i~:·,·:··:~
. P.eyor / ~ · · ,.,:• ·
. . _ .. :··_!· . ·. :.·;,,:::·::\/::Jt)f /t:J.~~
: .. ,, ~ .. ;! ;. ..
; ' -~-.:..:. ;· )·.:. ~ .;. 7 :~:·t ... , -~· :r-~. Jt·-~;. ~
·. :;_·.:-·/::. ,<:.:! :· \·~ \':;·.;
. t :. . · .• 'i -:/~
: -. 9'. -....
····· .. . . .
•
:<
. '..... • ........... :'I,.···
r: ..
I
I
.... ·
~-·
I • •
-
•
•
• -
M d S d d A N Ab ove econ e ve av Sta Wil 1 f ~ __:-y--
w .. i-. ..... (
:imnn ---· Haroi>r J -Clavton
Mann
Ma _y_?r Ta yX?U
__ .,, ____ --------~
)l.i .1-f-)U /Jn ~I?~
;Ju h (J /J l {l/)2 n.J
J
I /!_1_ ,, 1 /-,A_, k
. l!)t1-~ l)1JfV2
(;(;
?) )i1 ,u ,J ~
} )_ i LA' >v'
/J yJc ?ct/ ~u.,·
'I C!u. (}1.i j,
·1u
'
•
n Ab t sen
I . •
•
"' ed s ov
-
I 11 '.V(V
J
d d econ e
-
•
• •
ROLL CALL
A ve N av Abt 1 s a n Ab t sen
Wil 1 i?ms .J I/
IJohor I ~
sm1tn ~
, __
Harner V ,....-
Clavton ,_.-
Mann ~
Mayor Ta ~J-~r · t---
I . .
•
• -
• -
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ave Nav Abstain Absent
Wi fff ?Jr.~--T i7
Woh<>r --, ·--V :im1tn v
H11rn~ P---1-...-
~ Clavton v
Mann t ~
Ma y~r Ta rJ_?r I i---
)
• I . •
-
Moved Seconded
,I
•
•
•
• •
RO LL CALL
·-Ave Nav Abstain Wi 11 'i ?rr.s _.J
w-•--,r t
Sm1tr,
Harn .. r v
Clavton
Mann
Ma y~r Ta r.l~U
I / "dA-12 >1 !J r "
I I ' 'A. '1_, /l_J
l ' ./.)
Absent
I . .
-
V
•
•
• •
Moved Sec~nded A ve N av A bsta 1n Absent
w1 fn """s-_:T
w ..... .., ...
Smitr, t=
HarnPr V
Clavton I
Mann I
May_?r Ta r.}.~!:._j_
./'J QI ... .._-r, A I
((\Jr I / )' .,. ,
u \!
-t-,. t J( 'h
V
)
; './ '
I -.,-.-~ I
'/ VI {I
/) /.. ., /'
(
~
#// t,/ f /. . ,_, .L J !.
6 ,Jzl' I.<'<./,;· ,t.}
I I a . V:
I 1 /
' f"
L
~
...J. ,,,,. (t,,, f
77t -....1 f /.J I ',<
V V
•/i / ·4 A./ -O~fl
.I
)
i / v-...) C' ,I'
(
/.) Av vf >AL 1 /..
-I .; ~ cA ~ .,., tc.<
rd µ ~u f _/J '
U! t 1&-~/) >-' ~ 'J l (/
/ t-i:., ,.-
•
I • •
•
• -
Moved Seconded A ve Nav Abstain Absent
Will i?~S ~J
l.lfthn~
:im1tn -lfa.roirr_ Y
Clavton
Mann L.___
May~r Ta y]_~cj__
; R. ,;./.,, 0,.,-->')1 -J I /...-';I.
l
,J t
I
',. 1J I ' /1,,,l (! ~
,;/
?
,_
t;W f -1) I I ) } , , ,'}\._
r 3 t'O J f-
/ f.J I r (Y,. t' / ' ~ ,. I '•V
I / \,I'
J ,.,.,
( ' /
It a.. "'I :., ,. ..,,
-l' lV ,./ / >., '·
,J
.)
, , h/ I· , '/ ,I l ' ....., /; ,I' __,._ ,f~t LJ}
j
't. ,I ) .( .I / u 8 }) // ... v/t
:./
al u (. ~ ( (p'
j
l -../ /I
I \
(e.., tl,..-/'C ... v I >./ -_,,o. "I / ~ ..,
I u
" ' '
/ I / f 'I _.) ; >
}) {. ..., ) {
,. ) 'i,
() I vf '
:_/ ) l ,, l '1> ( 4 • • v •
(_ u ~ /v ~ 'l' ./4' ' ' ,1
(I
I I // µz u j ~ &)'~7: ~') /.
(/
• •
• -• -
-
Moved Seconded Ave Nav Abs ta 1n Wif1i?rr.s--_ _J
1•1-..,or ' :im1tn
~;irne.L.. V--
Clavton
Mann
Mayor Ta y]_:U
"
,-
t {)' j i • 6 (l , __ .... " • _i v
~
}2 1 1J ' f
J /u act
> 1 ·rt.,, .,4
·l &~I 't-i .J
_j_ / tJJ ·;ffi
) " L
,....
' -!
/J {., I._.
Cl .J '-" ))' .':.1 ~
,/.J #.
t l,J.. ;:t i c~
)
/)6
I /
)
t-.. , ~ ,J/.
'
')(.,/1-(u v ~,
II I
I
-<. I I
(
')),//~ U/'11 !J I.II~ lu ) i
I / )U ~d V ,J l.t-:-
• •
Absent
/
µ.. ... ,/ !
{
~i V
rt.1v I:'.~ f°,f)_ ~K
;1,,1 ~.
/ .,
I . •
•
•
• •
RO LL CALL
Moved Seconded A ve Nav Abstain Absent
Wi fn ?r.:s-:::_~f
Wi>bi>r
-Sm1tr,
~aro!rr_ ~
Clavton
Mann l
Ma :~~.!:. Ta yJ_?!:,j _
-, ~l
<>· , ~ . I "y r-.....
.. . fJJ f 3 I JI
) ./. n ;,; ca:., t
ti /' JD J 'I:./ -> :./1--l /J l ~ i ~~
J(/ (..11."'k.. j
0 j I I... l ) CA€ '.J.,t
c.....-
/, I • .,, .
I .
I . •
•
• -
RO LL CALL
Mo d S d d ve ec'Jn e A ve Nav Abstain Absent Wi 11 i ?lr.S ____ -·r--
IJn'-,-,~---,
sm1 t r,
1-larn<>r ....-:=--
Clavton
Mann 1
11,ay~r TayX-_:~
/-f )/ ~~ I
,J. , '/
-I
0 ,.
'
.
I .,
~:;l ::& . / :_)
~ ;};; '? }cJ ..+ t I)
.,
I •( ",I _I >',. 1 ' .... "" ••
/rJ-1 1' t.?/ ) 1.,., C..· • /. I 1< '1 /,
I -•
J v
""Ir v ,1 f /r.i Z .1 P ~ +-'IV ..t iJ . ,.J '/t / ~ -;ur k i <,S (I -~
j).( T ~ . ~~) ( Cf ..J 4 /I /l}J._.-<., ' .,, , z • I
;{. ~ I µ , ) r , ~I ,
/' co
d-,;;) _/ * A;/
t. .;J ,:) I" v J 1·-, /
II l, ... & J ... i. tu ,~II/ ' ,(7 I i j I --• J,,v I )~, ,J • In . j ,/ • ....J
• •
• -• -
ROLL CALL
Moved Sec~nded Ave Nav A Ab bsta n sent
Wi111?11'.S -T
IJ .......... :
Sm1tn
~ ..... n .. r -Clavton
Mann I
Ma _y~r Ta y]:?U
p • .,_.~ I\ }
....,? ) ) v .,
A 2-5--JI u {.J} .( , \ (/ .;::::!,
<J»w fa ) .,/ I ' f
(/
;3. J ~ •J
,
r ;, ~~is-,
C ·"' ( ....,L.....,
Id 1 n1 u 4 (I ) i ,.,J
J t 1· a7J l
-;t; ' ) /, /.. ' I t I 'I ' I f /' l
v CJ V
i,
.. ---
•
• I . •
• •
• -• •
RO LL CALL
Moved Seconded Ave Nav Absta n Absent
w1 fiTnr.~ -T
l.l~h,,.. ------+---+----+------1
smn n
Clavton
I I (J 0 .f / ;( ,/ 1)-, (/"
<·c r.
,(_ ") 2 / ,,
~ tC S 1~1 ,/1 (?J ~ / ;.. .! '· ,~, I ~ ./~.(, 1 1 •
/' \j
')I i ,)
I . •
• •
•
• -
Moved Seconded A ve N av Abstain Absent
Wi 11 f ?TT;S --· l ,_,_,.__ --i
~m1t n
Harofil:._ J..--
Clavton
Mann L.___
May~r Ta yJ_:i r ·1
J
c.1 iJ! I 1 3 J. v v L
f v / Jc; t ..u r;t--
//
!_? 13 r; 1/1~ ,1 I 5' 0 s;) I -, :; J,../c 7..(.
_ ~ ,;f, ~1lU-'-: .( .,,t/f' , iV cf -..I. L,, I', ~y"'*
j I A • , )' -.. :.,: u-r...· / y~ Jn ~ > l ( :.,I o J
tf{/1 ()!I-~, 7 // ; ti ~ f
t,1/LJ/> · t:
-·v. , a. I / J J. t1' u /-£t.(.J / u. ,-,i._& ~·
/l j j._/
I . •
s) ,{_.; ,1 -,,:-. J,A; {/ )) .. :; 0 1,_...,.. -(..I_~
• •
•
u
LI r V
•
• -
RO LL CALL
Moved S d d ec!>n e A ve
wi ffip ~s-~T-Nav Abstain Absent
w .........
sm1tn
1-brntt._ v ·
Clavton
Mann I
May_or Ta yj_~r ·
· . n 1 · "' o , l u ;J
/ 11----! ,lf_ I-
r!Lt , /)A ..t / 11 ,-_,. --,-7 i.v ~r -..:r/ J -1)
<-ii#-)_.1 ''1{,t.-~ /..{/./~
-.../I,/ J )dU( 0..-( { tl{:4 fa, t I )~ V ( /c?1 )
(,
rJJ n
u
/I ~ 1)0 >
1
-/ y,ti/ Uj ~~ / 'I(; Ut' '--"'l:..J +__,1j'
V CCL u t L ,1 ,l/ -b "?t.) 'J J
-(/ Ju.. a I (.ry ,t • e.., q;.,, ,./) I ,, 'J r 1 t1J;
(7,,,-, { tt :t jiu <.' I (; -u J
ii
I • I ' 'l {l >{ ._ -I/ l t L.'d / )' I ,; )(_J ~ /{ 0 ~ ( A-V r...t_)
• •
I • •
-
J~
•
•
• •
L.
Moved Seconded A ve Nav Abstain Absent
Wi f f'i ?rrs -~:f
1.1-L.-,,-
~m1t n
Haro~ -=
Clavton
Mann I
Ma :~or Tay]_?U
0 ::/r ._,.,) I '...I' I
/j 'J: ~-, J ;:1 Iv 0 /
( ) -r
710 I /)) J ~ I t .) ' J
--t/ ~ t" J /,,~, / ,I u.)
/1_/,(° ,,
t . ..,.
1./ I"
~,-J/t .... ~. -, I , )
/JI I ' ) _i..) _!/
c..V u ,,.,/: . ; ) ) .,.,/)) 1.1
a _) t ;z arf (<-J
{ I, J , /:"; ') /~x <I.J
-~-) (": " -; /) A;
I
/
)I
j
., ;
/ I .A ~." ,,, •• J
I
~I .,U . .,, ') --1 .?'• ,,
~ > ; )) l 1c.., ~ ,r $ > ......
u
<.i I . .;
\J
•
v //
. t...,,
) l,,/, I /.-, V
I • •
•
• •
Moved Seconded A N Abt 1 Ab ve ay s a n sent Wi f1-; ?rr.s-~J
Woho!r' ' sm1 t r,
HaroPr -Clavton
Mann
Ma yor Ta J'.r:u
S ru "'h /_/-u , ...) -1 ;_.}
0-1 ?,J
I j <., u f' cS· >1 ~ \ I /,, i i )
l / .... ' 1 ") ~ .....
-') 1 I '-l,, y0 ' ' I
O
---4
J j
;ft})q.{ J. --u )!t {l ~v ,
-/1 J ?, • >...i.
l -
)) -7 ,
---
I ~·
I . •
• •
•
• •
--
RO LL CALL
M d S ove d d econ e A ve N av Ab sta n Ab t sen ·-· Wi 11 ~ ?rns _J V
IJohor f 1,/" I
sm1t n ~
~'lrD~ ,__ <---'
Clavton ~
Mann 1,/"
Ma y_or Ta yJ _:U V"'
I . .
...
•
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seco d d n e Ave Nav Abs ta 1 n Absent
-
wi i-n ?rr.s ___ -T
,_,_,. __ -----;
sm, t r,
1-l'lrD~-
._::.-
Clavton
Mann L__
Ma yor Ta ~}-~cj_
~a:-;;>._,, J 1 .1..,. ju · / --... I-
-r ,/ .../> /
-'I/ ~ '-~· ,,a
'--
/ ( ( ) ' ? l U I
L) I/ '( ~ / I / ),-J ) _f I 0
I;./ :
u A-I 'J )rt4
) w ;) u ...). ,J "<t
-I-Jilt ./ ,.)) ..)/ ., . .,. './
) L. &n
I ('__. I J, 1 , /I.-' J. /f:/vl (
) -Jµ), (' /, t;. )
I/ I CJ' U...1 /J,"t C / d
,,.u > ~ I ) .. 1 t:~(' l:v
t2 j-< Cf,!...,· t I< I.
r
J ) l t' ,/ ) -.J./.J. r;, (?' ...
/ t ' v
1fa u"'4
•
,;:
I . •
,..,
•
• -
RO LL CALL
Moved Seconded w·,,. -----r~ Nay
1 • ;?~S
' w.......... -·,
!imitr,
Harn~~-
Clavton
Mann I
MayorTayi _,r ·1
~ ,,.. I 1)1 J. I"""' I
_,/
( 5' v.f ) .} ,! A..) _, ?./ --~p
fa ''d ,uJ --P"'J
lJ 0 0a I .I / ) r.:... ) ) I~ I I I I -../ ,~
I/ '-' J
(J ) ,: I /.,; ? // } ,
)/ ,
V
• •
Abstain Absent
/ , l /1 , .)
:.,t
/ 1 ~
'./
' .v
/(],,
J
'Y \: . I':/..
I . •
•
• -
--
Moved Seco nde d Ave Nav Abstain Absent
Wil lii'Jr.S --:r
w~1-.n~ I
sm, t r,
M~ro ~¥
Clavton
Mann
May_or Ta y]_~Ll
I I , ;J '?I-r:-...,.:1 _"4-
:, // ' j_ 0 I tt ' .(_,
)
J u fal. II X JJ .[ (
l,
'(( I (
/1) Ii.
I j " } ' ( -,A
()
I I ~, J" ) ,/./
I
h,
.,( I)
/,. /_.
I~ J .I ,. j ,
.( I v' @ ~·
,-.X:.; css--.;
j J
V 'VI"' J. ;0t J Jv ' ) I
I I /J )
~ ) 1 J u1 11 '° /( v ':J > I ,,(
0
, I 'J/ (/) C C '.1 JL .:})1.,,11/1 ,,_,,,;, J
( ,, I ;. l 'l,:,
ii ; I I ,.-.r r
I I !) ru
u.,. J ) .... /.) , )
"L
(J 1 -.I
'I I I ~ -<J '8-
I~ 1
. tfrM-t., I ~)) -J ) > 1 {~ ) ''/
,,.
I 1
,,, -l ,,i . .) .JP ~·· ) • • ..,.
') V
./ b /1 1 1) <! )'~ ' I I lt <-,; ~,J I
• •
• -
• •
-
Moved Seconded A ,Ve Nav Abstain Absent
Wifli?!l'.~ I
w .. h .. ~---,
~m1tr,
lfarn<>r v
Clavton
Mann
Ma yor Ta yJ_?U
{, 1 • )f } I'! /t f«J G,,t uJ.-/l ~,1 J&'
Iv
I J /./-; {J.)/11, ( I z-. I . J. J { )} 1 .I J,JL-t) 1,{'> 'J7.,>..
V / V
V}--h.LI ,, t
t_}..,1/J :) 1CJ 11~ /f )J,,) -~ ( ' ..;
t'"'
{I p.)
£11 . J ,f V 0 l ,./
V a./ (I ~ L ~; / j) ( I lr "'JI, ,j v/1 L
I -(.;
)J r ·; -// 'I
I
I .J
)) / ,# c/_ J ) LA
'-
'lu
_/J ) } / _.; / / I ., ,.
,-
J 6 L / I }
(,,' I
2,1 ) FI/ I~,
.; J_~/2-/l v
Cl I :A I ,I J ) I ..... ' ' .. /.,
V I I ) VA. /~ I
)t I )--r;,/ ~) _;t-/,, ;, 1 IJ ) t'V
J, (? l ..L,
e •
•
•
• •
RO LL CALL
Moved Sec~nded
Wi11ir rr.s--~T
Wfthft~ I
::.m1tn
Haro!rr._ V
Clavton
Mann
May~.!_ Ta x}_0 r I
; m /}Jr., rt:i ~-a (t)
d
11 ~ ..... ,,.._, >-<'../
<..., I ,~uN-U
'--'/w~rJi~ 1 t S ~ ~
•
~ fv -
d/?.
rv ,.,u;( -I ch
A ve N av
•
Abstain Absent
I . •
•
• •
---
RO LL CALL
Moved Seconded Na Abstain Absent
[I
-J (.~ z;oJ-J
-;;?/CO tf-u A IO Z:,,1. >
/C/'1 'J cu y_ t i/ '"l ~ ,~ y.
~ J,;;_,_ rlw t U-f ~,1 , ..;
l ~; U...J ('f"' /?' ~ < • I
/)/.d. / r.
J ~.,( . ..,a l( <
, A . " ;..._, I • •
-cf~, ;?11. a_ "Y.,/ (' -t-1 ~ 0
"' ,: I / ~ ~ 1 i <¥" A, L J,Vclj ~ r/ k.-
/) i l ~ e,(.__.
/r ,J Y"' • b lL// /~ P'/)? i /2.o ~ '-1 ~
<7../,/ )') ,n ~ 1,/17, ~ / /
• •
-
•
• -
ROLL CALL
M d S d d ove econ e A ve N av Ab t 1 Ab t s a n sen
Wi 111._?ms·--=T
Woho ~ !
::i m1tr. ·--
~'lrD~
Clavton
Mann I
May ~.!:_ Tay_~::Q
~ .J.'
Jc:J j t .
-lJ 10, cl ll ' _,I..< --<) t\O,, l /
' J II
-r:210 ~w -1,t..1 -'~~., /241Jffid d ?~ ~ ~ rF
-/v; . ~d..l tw~.h 11 ,, V ,ziJJ 1, e,,1!1. fl'!~
~ ---,v.-fl'n( itt d7L ')~ ~ ~
\-'-:=---=:::::=;::;-=~==''='--i=--Z='V-, .;,;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,;;;;;;;;~;:;;;;;;;:;;....._
• •
I • •
-
(
•
•
• -
Moved Seconded Ave Nav Abstain Absent
Wi 11 i ?~S ~]--4--------+------1
I
1-----+----+--sm_11t_r, ____ ..j_ __ 4.-~---~---,
Haro~·---+--+--------+------1 1-------+-----+-cC~la ...... tvton
Mann ! __ _j. ______ -1-----1
1-------+-----+.....;M,a=.,ay~}r j ·--L---L---...J-.-----'
tb l. ~/ rt '-/ A.; I /-13 ~y 3
J ,1 ~,t\') ,t; l-> )).,,1,.-..)) -~ft/}) ,,t,,.~ tf U l..1 / t_ o.-
__,/ a t}7. ~ i:?c '/ /! ),.. /? ./ ,/ ./ I I. ) j <I
•
I . •
•
• •
Moved Seconded Ave Na Abstain Absent
t ) : ' ,/
--c;-·-·-
-/, ~ >i fl,, .._ J-:_, .,/ /p-u.t:A
~ lui.J aJ.t~ ,,~~ 1 ZUJ..A /X/2<)
JA .,,U, lu.t..d / <,#. ~ 6..r 1 • )I) , ./1 '-''~
M ~lJOtlA --/d. / 1r <-~ w~ ,,t ~ ;;1 tJ I 1.
\ ,,?,.u_, ;, ;,;1 I., . ,;~ ( ~-
I . •
• •
•
• •
0
RO LL CALL ---=
M d S d d ove econ e Ave Nav Abstafn Absent W il11 i' "r.;; -· _-:J
Woh~-' ~m1tr,
w,. .. oer i..--
Clavton
Mann
Ma .~9r Ta.}'.]_:.cj_
V
~
,_1~,,.,,_, ~ ~ / <ud ,,z x,au
I/
;...-IL ~ l,. I ~ ~ ~ rt-/Vet-&;:,,£,~
J ,, I . •
• •
•
• -
RO LL CALL
Moved Sec'Jnded Ave Nav Ab 1 sta n Ab t sen
Wi1, 1i'rrs -__ r-
w .. h .. r ~m, t r, -Haroer V
Clavton
Mann ' I
Ma yorTa0_:U
--
-./-< /~
-c2ct v~ ~ (,~~ ~
_ ~~ L ) ~ /)..fJ(jG ~i
~u, a~ -"tv-£J-
-----J. ;.----c; 'nJ-, 6 '-I J. cS !J c:l-<l h ~
.-f)£t pv e,, /... ~ ,< /1.:., tr-;,-~ . Jf.1l C'..,t.J_() I • •
, M
\ • •
•
• •
Moved Sec~nded Ave Nav Abstain Absent
Wi11i?Jr.S _J
Woho.-!
::im1tr,
1b.-npr V-
Clavton
Mann !
Mayor Tay)_~U
~c~ Ci l n 0/(t; ~ ~~ 0 e
-r?W ~ f-/,dd-----
u J~/ !_tJ
0 f; I.:)[ r
J t}
;Jiu~ A / ?)1
)
1 > I
' ( ,if u ~ /
{/
~ ~/;"'-'UVh(.J .f /IJ~~-.
I
,,.
I ' t /I I
• •
'11 1 r
J
I • •
-
•
Moved Sec~nded
Wil'i ?r.-5 -]
l.loho.-
::,m11:r, -1.1;,,.o@r , __
Clayton
Hann
Ma yor Tay1_:Ll
'(J._.U,2,cf!.b)v " . .fi-h
(;
!l e-h l
) ~// 2
c!;j) I )) / I )1.,,1, I-~
,;
3) ,,4 {L', ~ u"
A
•
• •
ve
-1-v
Nav Ab sta n Ab t sen
I . .
•
• -
• •
=-=·
RO LL CALL
Moved Seconded A 1ve Nav Abstain Absent
Wil11i'1r.S I
u .. h .... ----;
smnr,
Harn4>r ;,.,?-
Clavton
Hann
Ma y or Tay]_!U
(3;_)J r2dh ) r"' :J tJ s-~ µ~ I ,,.
v -r r~7 1 ~ ll -'
1 tJ )JI) l) 'J -1~ ) rt ..I (S..; /Y) w. ' I U-4 ~xuJ ~
-,4v_,_, l z;; // ~p · ~o t.,
u·
(f 'I ' /J., 'UJ... ',.J.
• I . .
• •
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
d s d A A Hove ec!lnde ve Nav Abstain bsent
Wi1 1i P1T.S -:r:J?-
~ wft1-.,,,. i '-'""' sm1tn I /'
Haro@r v-=-i7
I/ Clavton ~
Hann I I/
Ma~or Tay_l ~r · ,---
I • •
• •
•
• •
RO LL CALL
Mov ed s d d ec'Jn e A ve Nav A bsta n Ab sent
Wi 11 i i'lr.S -~:1
Waha~
:imitn -Harner I---
Clavton
Mann
Ma y_or Ta y)_'.'.U
I . k jl.//l. ,,, ) )
/ / )I ,1)
I)
• I . •
• •
• -
• •
-
ii
RO LL CALL
M d S ove d d econ e A ve N av Ab sta n Ab t sen
Wi11 i ?r.'.S __:-:r V
lolohor t v-
Sm1t r, ,.._..... -HaroPr I--V"
Clavton V
Mann 1 ,....--
Ma yor Ta y]_:r I L,..,,-"
;J
/~C/)7
• I . •
• •
• -• •
RO LL CALL
Moved Seconded Ave Nav Abs ta 1n Absent
I / Wi 11 iams --'·'-"~" Smitr. -
Marn«_//'
Clavton
Mann d Mayor T~y] Er
I . .
• •
• -• •
_.., -~-
RO LL CAL L
M d S ove d d econ e A lye Nav Abstain Absent
Wil 1 iam·s --·
77' 1•1-'-.Pr ·-
1/ 5mTfr.
lfarnirr_Y
Clavton
Mann I
Mayor T~iEU
• I . •
\ • •
• -• -
~9LL CALL
M eel S OY d d econ e A we Nav Ab Sta n Ab t sen
Wi11111m~ I V .
Uai.,.,-V
:,mar. v
MA .-n!il'.-. V
Clavton v
Hann I 1/
Mavor T~y_1_9!:.._j_ 1/"'
I • •
• •
• -•
r •
ROLL CALL
M ed S OY d d econ e A we Nav Absta n Ab sent ---Wi 11 iam!-·----u-i.-~
sm1t r.
Haro~.
Clavton
Mann L
Mayor Ta_y).9!:.J..
J. ft;l..J
/) /J /) --f-
• I . •
•
• -
• r •
ROLL CALL
Moved Second d e Ave Nav Abs ta 1n Absent
I Wi1 11ams --· ,,.......
.
1.1-L --,_
// --Sm1t r. ,_
. -fiarott-/,,/'
I/ Clavton v-
Mann
Mavor ~T!IT
,.--
~
0
• I . •
\ . • ,J
• -
•
r •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ave Nav Abs ta 1n Absent
Wi 11 iami: ~
Wohor' ,.-
V ::.mar. -,~
J/ Haro~ V
Clavton v
Mann ,.,,..
MayorTa y,.9!:.J_ V
• I . •
• •
-
Moved Seconded
•
•
•
•
( •
________ ...,...._
~·--~-= ~---
ROLL CALL
Wi1 11a ms ~--· u .. h ....
;)1!11 t.r.
Marn~
Clavton
Mann
Mavor T~l _lE r
Ave Nav Abstain
/ "''-"' (-(,
•
Absent
I . •
• -
• •
---___ __,,, ______ _ --~---------
RO LL CALL
Med S dd ov econ e A \Ve N av Ab sta n Ab t sen -·-· Wil 1111m!-..
u,.i,..,r
::.mnr.
u .... n!U'.-.
Clavton
Mann I
Mayor Ta y_1 EU
• I . •
• •
-
-
G
•
•
•
• •
~9LL CALL
M ed S ov d d econ e A 1ye -·-· Wi 11 iam ~ I ·---V W<>h<>r I v-
:>m1tr. I
ll;iro!tl:_ V l V ,_ Clavton I V
Mann · L '~
Mayor T~y_1 .9i:.J..
fl ft Yq7
/~')V °6,1,
N av
t,,-
,__
•
------
Ab sta n Ab t sen
~
I . •
In n
•
l
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded A -,ve Nav Abstain Absent William:--w-i..--
sm1t r.
Harn!:.r_-V
Clavton
Mann I
Mayor T~~ EU
(/,IJ !'~9,· .. ~ .I. ~ i < • 7 ,Pi// f' I I ,-,, \ '-' /' ;'
/
I,.; } I /1 / } i .,,
;j ,..r;,,/ I. I
( I , I ,./ 7 } -ffJ I, / ) ( v /.. , I • •
•
• -• -
~Q LL CALL
A e Na Abstain Absent
Mann ,a orTa~.E!:._Lt--r--+----l-----l
' u /}1-?"' t ~ I
/_,1_/"/g@. J/_ t .
-; ""(l !'\
-/V
I .
• •
•
)
• -
~9Ll CALL
M d S d d ove econ e Ave Nav Abstafn Absent
W11 11a m~ V' -----v IJAhAI" ~
:,m1t r. I -
u .... n!!r-..v , __
Clavton ;..-,,, Mann IT,_,..
Mavor T~~ I ..-
I . .
• •
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ave Nav Abstafn A bsent
Wil 11 ams -IJ .. h ....
~m1tr.
lfarn«__V
Clavton
Mann i
Mavor T~~
j J I
J;i-I u ~~
/2 :.1.J J J.., !// ') ~·) / J
j --u
/J,) OIJ I
./'J ' .JI 7,,,,.,tt '-'
ti
I . •
\
•
• -• •
ROLL CALL
MovM-Seconded Ave Nav Abstain Absent
V Wil1 iam ~ --Uaha~
Smffr.
Mar'n!rr -I/
Clavton
Mann L
Mayoriii~
• I . •
\
'
•
•
•
• •
ROUGH DRAFT ill
RESOLUTION NO. ;/ SERIES OF / C/1 i> -----'
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO THE DENVER REGION AL
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REQUESTING THAT U.S. 285 BETWEEN SOUT H
SANTA FE DRIVE AND SOUTH BROADWAY BE CONSTRUCTED AS A ONE-WA Y
COUPLET, AND THAT FUNDING FOR THIS PROJE CT BE APPROVED AS A
SUBSTITUTE PROJECT UNDER THE I-470 TRANSFER .
WHEREAS, I-470 has been officially withdrawn from the
Interstate System ; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Funds 01i.e.lnally programmed for I-470,
$158,287,000, were made available for use in the Denv er Metro-
politan Area; and
WHEREAS, approximately $61,200,000 of these funds remain
available for transportation projects; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor of the City of Englewood, with the
unanimous approval of the Engl ewo od City Council, on September
16, 1977 requested that the Denver Regional Council of Govern-
ments place U.S. 285 improvements between South Santa Fe Drive
South Broadway on the Regional Transportation Improvement Program
and to fund construc tion with the I-470 transfer funds; and
•
I • •
•
•
•
• •
-2-
WHEREAS, fte r due consideration the Englewood Cit y Council
reaffirms its position that the traffic c on flicts on U.S. 285
between South Santa Fe and South Broadway involving throu gh
traffic and local traffic can best be solved by utili z ing th e
present U .S. 285 as the west bound section of a one-way coupl et
and Ithaca as the east bound section; and
WHEREAS, U.S . 285 is the only east/west art eria l of region al
significance south of U.S. 6 ; and
WHEREAS, the recommended improvement to U.S. 285 in this
area will greatly facilitate east/wes t regional movement and
reduce traffic conflicts and accidents ,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ENGLEWOOD CITY
COUNCIL:
That the Denver Regional Council of Governments place the
one-way couplet of U .S. 285 between South Santa Fe and South
Broadway on the Regional Transportation Improveme n t; and
That the Denver Regional Council of Governments approve tre
use of I-470 transfer fu nds for the construction of the improve-
ments necessary to implement the proposed one-way couplet on
U .S . 285 ,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Englewood will
cooperate with any Federal, Sta te, Regional or Local body to
faci litate the construction of the proposed improvements and
that, to this end, the City will commit whatever resources are
at its disposal.
•
I •
n
,(
•
•
• -
/
t" < ••
J
ROUGH ( DRAFT {12
RESOLUTION NO.
, I r , t
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO THE DENVER REGIONA L
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REQUESTING THAT BROADWAY (YALE TO FLO 'D,
QUINCY TO BELLEVIEW), BE APPROVED FOR I-470 TRANSFER FUNDING,
CERTIFYING SUPPORT FOR THE ABOVE PROJECT AND CERTIFYING THE
INTENTION AND ABILITY OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO MATCH FEDERAL
FUNDS IF THE PROJECT rs SELECTED.
WHEREAS, I-470 has been officially withdrawn from the
Interstate System ; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Funds originally programmed for I-470,
$158,287,000, were made available f or use in the Denver Metro-
p olitan Area; and
WHEREAS, approximately $61,200,000 of these funds remain
a v ailab l e for transportation projects,
NO W, THE REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Englewood City Council supports the improvement
of South Broadway between Yale Avenue and Floye Avenue, and
between Quincy Avenue and Belleview Avenue ; an d
That the Englewood City Council directs the City Administra-
tion to prepare an application to the Denver Regional Council
of Governments requesting that South Broadwa y between Yale
and F loyd and between Quincy and Bell eview b e approved for
•
I • •
-
'
•
•
• •
That the Englewood City Council is able and will ing t o
match Federa l funds for this project if it is selected for
fu nding.
•
-2 -
I • •
'
f
•
•
• •
ROUGH DRAFT jf4
RESOLUTION NO. ~~~~~' SERIES OF
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN ftPPLICATION TO THE DENVER REGION AL
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REQUESTING THAT SOUTH LOGAN STREET
(DARTMOUTH AVENUE TO YALE AVENUE) BE APPROVED FOR I-470 TRANSFE R
FUNDING, CERTIFYING SUPPORT FOR THE ABOVE PROJECT AND CERTIFYING
THE INTENTION AND ABILITY OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO MATCH
FEDERAL FUNDS IF THE PROJECT IS SELECTED.
WHEREAS, I-470 has been officially withdrawn from the
Interstate System ; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Funds originally programmed for I-470,
$158,287,000, were made available for use in the Denv er Metro-
politan Area; and
WHEREAS, approximately $61,200,000 of these funds remain
available for transportation projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Englewood City Council support s t he improvement
of South Logan Street (Dar t mou th Avenue to Yal e Ave nue ); and
Th at the Englewood City Council directs the City Adminis r a-
tion to prepare an application to the Denver Regional Council
of Governments requesting that South Logan Street (Dartmouth
ve nue to Yale Aven ue) be approved for fundin g fr om the I-470
transfer funds; and
I • •
-
l
•
(
•
•
• •
That, the Englewood City Council is abl e and will in~ o
match Federal funds for this project if it is selected f o r
fun ding ,
•
-2-
I • •
I r:, r,
(
(
•
• -
ROUGH DRAF T /f 5
RESOLUTION NO,
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO THE DENVER REGIONAL
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REQUESTING THAT SOUTH BANNOCK STREET
(U.S. 285 TO NASSAU AVENUE) BE APPROVED FOR 1-470 TRANSFER
FUNDING, CERTIFYING SUPPORT FOR THE ABOVE PROJECT AND CERTIFYING
THE INTENTION AND ABILITY OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO MATCH
FEDERAL FUNDS IF THE PROJECT IS SELECTED,
WHEREAS, I-470 has been of f icially withdrawn from the
Interstate System ; and
WHEREAS, The Federal Funds originally programed for I-470,
$158 ,287,000, were made available f or use in the Denver Metro-
po litan Area; and
WHEREAS, approximately $61,200,000 of these fu nds remain
available f or transportation projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the Eng lewood City Council supports the improvement
of South Bannock Street (U.S. 285 to Nassau Avenue); and
That the Englewood City Council directs the Ci ty Administra-
tion to prepare an application to the Denv er Regional Cou ncil
of Governments requesting that South Bannock Street (U.S . 285
to Nassau Avenue) be approved for funding from the I-470
transfer funds ; and
I • •
I r.:1 • Jr,
-
(
(
•
•
• •
-2-
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the City o f Englewood supports the inclusion o f Qui ncy
Avenue between South Federal Boulevard and South Santa Fe Driv e
in the Transportation Improveme n t Program.
That the City of Englewood supports the use of I-470
transfer funds for the construction of Quincy Avenue improve-
ments.
I • •
'
•
•
)
• •
RO UGH DRAFT Jf 6 ' (
QUINCY AVENUE
WHEREAS, I-470 has been officially withdrawn from the
Interstate System; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Funds originally programed for I-470,
$158,287,000, were made available for use in the Denver Metro-
politan Area; and
WHEREAS, approximately $61,200,000 of these funds remain
available for transportation projects; and
WHEREAS, The Denver Regional Council of Governments has
requested that local governments within the Denver Metropolitan
Area submit projects for the use of these Transfer Funds; and
WHEREAS, a major criteria for the approval of individual
projects is the project's regional significance; and
/ .f I .I I 1 ' 'I , f I
lilf-EREAS-, the construction of Quincy Avenue between Sou th
1 :• .;j..; I ;tvt ,r~
Federal Boulevard and South Santa Fe Drive is df r Jg i on /1
significance i n that it will r e lieve some of the east/west
traffic that normally uses U.S . 285 \and present Santa Fe
plans call for the construction of a major interchange at
Quincy.
•
I • •
In n
-
I
(
•
'
•
•
• •
-2-
That the City of Englewood supports the use of I -470
Transfer Funds for the construction of South Clarkson S tree t
improvements.
That tbe City of En1lewood is willing and able to provide
its portio n o f the ma t ch ing f unds necessary to see this p r oject
through to completion.
•
I • •
-
•
•
• -
ROUGH DRAFT /17
SOUTH a.ARKSON STREET
WHEREAS, I-470 has been officially withdrawn from the
Interstate System ; and
WHEREAS , the Federal Funds originally programed for I-470,
$158,287,000, were made available for use in the Denver Metro-
politan Area; and
WHEREAS, approximately $61,200,000 of these funds remain
available for transportation projects; and
WHEREAS, the Denver Regional Council of Governments has
requested that local governments within the Denver Metropolitan
Area submit projects for the use of these Transfer Funds ; and
WHEREAS, a major criteria for the approval of individual
projects is the project's regional significance ; and
!;;, u•· It 1-'1/ ? i.J -, I,, C, _;_--+
v / /1 . JI . v ' !) I
WBERKA~, the construction of South Clarkson Street between
.J -' U.S. 285 and East Orchard Avenue ~s a project o f regional
s ignific ance tha-t involves the communities of Englewood , Cherry
Hil ls Village and Greenwood Village ,
NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED :
That the City of Englewood supports the inclusion of South
Clarkson Street between U.S. 285 and East Or chard Avenue in
the Transportation Improvement Program ;
•
I • •
.......
•
•
• -
That the City of Englewood supports the use of I -470
Transfer Funds for the construction of South Zuni Street
improvements .
-2 -
That the City of •nglewood is willing and able to prov ide
its port io n o f t he ma tch ing f u nds necessary to see this project
through to completion .
•
I • •
In
-
(
(
•
•
l
• -
ROUGH DRAFT ff9
ZUNI STREET FROM DARTMOUTII AVENUE TO U.S. 285
WHEREAS, I-470 has been officially withdrawn from the
Interstate System; and
WHEREAS, The Federal Funds originally programed for I-470,
$158,287,000, were made available for use in the Denver Metro-
politan Area; and
WHEREAS, approximately $61,200,000 of these funds remain
available for transportation projects; and
WHEREAS, the Denver Regional Council of Governments has
requested that local governments within the Denver Metropolitan
Area submit projects for the use of 1hese Transfer Funds; and
WHEREAS, a major criteria for the approval of individual
projects is the project's regional signif~cance; and
/ / ..), / ) 1 ' . ' ,,.
WHE~AS, the construction of South Zuni Street from
,..1
Dartmouth Avenue to U.S. 285..is a project o f regional significance
that involves the communities of Englewood and Sheridan .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That the City of Englewood supports the inclusion of
South Zuni Street from Dartmouth Avenue to U.S. 285 in the
Transportation Improvement Program; and
I • •
I ,-,
-
(
•
•
)
• •
ROUGHT DRAFT #8 •
FL OYD AVENUE -SOUTH GALAPAGO TO SO UTH ZUNI
WHEREAS, I-470 has been officially withdrawn from the
Interstate System ; and
WHE RE AS, th F ederal Fu n ds originally programed for I-470,
$158,287,000, were made availa ble for use in the Denver Metro-
politan Area ; and
WHEREAS, approximately $61,200,00 0 of these funds remain
avai lable for transportation projects; and
WHEREA S, the Denver Regional Co uncil o f Governments has
requested that local governments within the Denver Metropolitan
Area submit projects f or the use of these Transfer Funds; and
WHEREAS, a major criteria for the approval of individu a l
projects is the project's regional signi fic ance; and
WHEREAS, the construction of Floyd Avenue between South
Galapago Street and South Zuni Street is a project of regional
significance that involves the communities of Englewood and
Sheridan,
NOW, TH ERE FORE , BE I T RESOLVED :
That the City of Englewood supports the inclusion of
Floyd Ave nue betwee n South Galapago Stree t and South Zuni
street in th e Tra n sportation I mpro veme nt Program, and
•
I • •
n
-
•
•
• -
Co'.!ncilman Uon webber
City of li:nglewood
~nglewood , Colorado
::l,;,ar Councilman :
Re : Resol11 i.on il (Series 1978)
Pavin? Di~ ri~t i 2S
F.as AmhArst Place, be Lween Penns;rlvania a.,,, , 1'1rkson S
Tne accompa'lying titians , protestin~ the inclusion.of ~as Amherst
Place in Paving District /25 , ca rry signatures of all of~ Ju p!"oper y ~,
r~;:,resen ing 100% ~!:_ ~ effe ei ~ ~·
It is tne combined opinion of tre signers that. the stre s, r:J''ers ,
and walks of East Amherst Place presently are in reasonably 1:ood con! it ion, and
Ln1t a special tax assessrrent is not necessary for suc h minor r epairs as ma:1 b
OP.eded .
Too street improvements built, by hA develooer in 1955 exceeior! Ci •y
r'lquiremen:.S , Soil tesLs made by tre City in 1975 show that even 20 ye.1r,i
ter Lne total street thicknesses (base plus overlay) were 7 incnes , 11 inc'lcs,
10 incnes , 8 2 incnes , and 91 inches, resoecLively--an average of 9 ,0 inch,.,,
wn· n exceeds tne City 's presen 8-inch re~uirernent-:-The soiltests iuH•at,
lii1ite i c rac,cing in one lock only ; no buckling, washboarding, sink1!l.g, ~-
2£ pavement dis placemen~ was no ed ny place •
. one of the concre e gu',ters need repair. #f' have notice1 ~ I
-,iiew3.l,c c r acks ma r ked with orange paint by toe City . Th!lse ar'l minor en-ks
ani do not cons iL11te any hazard ,
Tne developer, Mr , • W. An erson (T , • Anderson Co ., 950 West
Ham;.,,fon) in ormed us recently that this subdivision , Yal'l Manor , was buil an·!
improve! under tne strict supe r vision of he buildin inspec or in 195S , arr
t:1,1t, otherwise, City ouncil would not have ap::iroved its anooxa ion to E:n!!lewood .
Annexation occurf'-i on June 6 , 1955 (Coun il Mi.'lutcs , Book 9, P1?P l:>J),
Council consi,forf'l various aspects or the nn,•xa ion o at Hs meetin!!s of
r r n 21, 1955 , A ril u , 19~5, April lq, 19S5, r.ay 9, 19~5, a.,d May 16, 19~S.
4t no :Jla~r> in Council Minutes is any men'ton maio of subs a'l'hr1 s ree ,i,.,,el-
opmerit--;--;:;r-futurespeci~l assessments for s reets, or of an, intent not to ,ro'lii~
t.Hse ;i roperties witn u.5u-1l and routine s ~et maint..-i'nance frorn general~~·
Members of the Office of tne Di ctor of Public works rr>cPnt.ly nav
informed property owners on East Amhers Phce that this street i3 bl? inr: in l 1 !,,j
in Pa vinr Distric /12 5 "beca e yoiJ. never have been in a paving di.strlc t be ori>,"
lie know of ~ statutory bas is fol" this line of r eas on lng, Nor i.s it lo;,i al ,
considering that tt10 street fm;:irovements were built properly by tne ievelopnr
jn tne first place , in compliance wi tn building codes, at no expense to the ~.
an1 accepte ! £2.r annexation !?.'!'. ~1 without reservation .
•
I • •
Ir, M
-
•
•
• •
Councilman Webber page 2
Incidentally, during two recent summers this s reet was expose o
extraordinary abuse for substantial periods by dirt dump trucks and heavy
e quipment used i n constructing City storm sewe rs on botn East Bates AventP
and in the East Amherst Av e nue and Clarkson Street areas . Moreover, increaser!
usage of the street has been n o ted since the development of the Bates-Logan
City Park . These uses ha ve not necessarily benefited the proper ty owners, but
nave constituted a se rv ice to the City as a whole, which costs should be borne
by the City as a who le .
For the above reasons, it is respectfully requesteri that yo.J. exe rt
every possible e ffort to secure a vote of City Council , severing East Amhe r:,
Place from Paving Dis trict #2 5 .
Yours Very Truly,
~.l,,t, '>Y."1"-~
Gerald wl. Pool
Proper y owner at 643 East Amherst Place
Enclosur es :
Petitions ( 6 :iages );
City soil test reports f or 500 and 6oO Blocks .
•
I)
I • •
n
-,..
•
/•
Pa 1 of 6
P C: T I T I u .,
\-Jc , tr1c undersi~ e , o,mc :-s of property f a · YJl3 the SOD , GOO , n 700 b:!.oc~s of
Za.:;t Am .cr.;t Place , or a j cent prop:irty fac ing C:as t A:nhc rst Place , in Engl"woo ,
Co :ir:ido , nc r cby do petition tre Cit y Council o the City of i::n g l ewood , to str~ ... <e
• ror.1 its Resolution !/1 (Series 197 3 ) all pru;,osc, stree t, walk , c rb , and g ttc
r "'p::ii ::-.;, including tree molostation , r a ati:i ,; t.o ·~ast A:nnc r s t ?lac e .
It i.:.i ou..-po:..ition that a 1 payments f'vr , .• re pair s on such street
:;, Olll:! come from gc n,:ral t,ix mvenuc:.. of ,,...1 :;_LJ, and not f rom any Sp:!cia l
i m.;.ov~:ne nt dist.r ict and , furt.:'.c r, t:.-:.t m:1.~o r-rt.:y1ir.; o s-...:ch s tre e t at this ti rr.c
arc not ne c essa ry .
n. w
.:il gnc
Sir,n a turl) of
Pro pJrty Owner :
~ai.l "11.~ .\ idrt.:JS of i.r,r,al Do .:;c r lpt.lon of
?ro;:>c r ty :
Lo t J, Bloc k S, Yale r an or
~,_,,,-t ?f
I -! ({ ,
-r. ~ JJ1</~
I/ I~
•
--. ~--:--~-g
E1·}4
;JC...( & fev~ /'.
D7~ <-<i: cJ'{)1IO
·7 ) f: ) mlv .. i .:,; P/
(' I ,q / t'll....l."YY'/, (l, {C
3o ! IL
Lot 9, Bloc k 6 , Yale Man or
Lot 11, Bloc k 6, Yale Man or
Lot 12, Bloc k 6 , Yale Manor
7 3 3 €, l\n, h<".-:,1 Pl · Lot S, Block S, Yale Man or
'J 'f .r..-lJ << Sc ,1 0
•
Lot 8, Block 6 , "!ale Manor
ot 11 , Block 6, Yale Man or
")./
(_
Lot 8, Block 4, Yale
I • •
-
r
\
•
Page 2 of 6
PC:TIT ION
:·h , t.he un ,tcr .;i ~no , ownerr; o f pro;xi r ty fac i:l e ti:e 500 , 600 , and 700 blocks of
S st ,\m,~c rst ?lac e , or adjacent property fac inG Sa s t Amhe r st Place , in Encl.nwood ,
Co :-ir do , ·3 r 0 by d o f)()titi on t ie City Cou11 c ·1 o, the City o f Englewood , to stri.'<e
.:-or.i its :!es olut ion !/1 ( e r ies 1 978 ) a ll pro;Jo::;cd stree t, walk , c ur b , and gu t ter
r a,xiir s , includ·ng tree mole stati on , r e latin g to .:.ast Am r.e r st ?lace .
lt is our position that all pay:nents for sue ' repairs on such stre et
snould come from ge n,~r a l tax revenues of the City , and n o t f r om any s;iecia l
fr._:-o veme nt district and, fu::-ther , that maj or r epairs of suc h street at tnis time
• r .J r.ot. r.e c e ssary.
D .. ~
.:3.:.e;ne ·:
Si:.;na ture of
?r;Jp3 r ty Owner :
~:ailing A dress of
?roperty Owne r :
uiga l Desc r iption o f
?r ope r ty :
~1-J £,A:-.1 ,/,,f'Y ·.,t-/'/ L ol &>1 D /o ._l(
/ t' /) Y ct/e. f'1,;1 n~r
..,J;,:::....:c::,_nc..:._,_· :.._l_;_'l..:._:,8_ /...Jpt,cift:L, 1. r;"tY --E12!]L_:':'~· lc ~c. r-P"'----------,.---,.----. · -c 7 ;} t )?2f.-
r,.
,u
•
I <f l 8' --'), '-('_,._.:rf'.
.ye, )7/;l·/ { '
P,
,q, 1() / 'JI, ~,Li l u~ ~.,ru.Cft
I I, ~> I ""'I u-<., I...
! 'I IV_..,..,-ri) ~,._,.
~ ,,.
I t f;-W ; , ,
\ , . ' •• ~!c_.i:~
~q3
.. -
• ' '1
J J.!_c,) U l..
--IC-. t I I
} .,-
)7 ? tt..,,'1-&--V
RT OF BLK 28 YALE HTS
AS BEG 1 98 FT~ OF IDil
C R OF BLK 2 8 , TH S 150 FT ,
..,.4.. T E ho FT TO TRUE P O B,
1; fi J'I{ h --
.'t,..-i.,. , ~
•
T NE LI ALJ S!'.:LI RO W LINE OF
F R CITY DITCH TO A PT 20 FT
W OF E LI NE OF BLK 2 8 , TH N
T GEN LINE OF SD DITCH , TH
S LI ALG SO CEN LINE TO S LINE
0 BLK 28 , THE TO BEG .
//
S 50 FT OF N 100 FT
BLK 27 YALE HTS .
L CJ I -., h /Q ,!--/( ~
I"/ ~/f/Ot -
} , : J~V
I • •
I n ,..,
(
•
, .
Page J of 6
P ..:TI' I Ll'.<l
, c , t w unrl.o rsi;;no , o ma r s of p:-o,x.:r ty ;':.c · :i:.; tno 500 , 600 , and 7 00 b oc,<s of
C: 3;. 1~p:r.c r;;:. ?iac l:l , or adj cent pro;:>::!rt.y f . cin.; i!:, s t t.:nha r st P ace , in En ,l c wood ,
Co.'..or,do , no r oby do ;ietition t i:e City Co.inc ·:!. r t.he City of Englewood, to strue
r-o . its ?.cs olut ion J l (Serie s 1978 ) a ll ;:>rope.,.,.... stree t , walk , curb , :ir.d gutter
,·-:;i ai:-s , incl ding tree molestation , r alati .; r,., : :;t ,:run r st ?lac e .
It i3 ou:-po:;ition th t al payment.s for .:., :-ep -ir s on such street
si:o ld co,r.0 fro m ge n,:r;,l tax re venues of t 0 •.:: ~;;, and not f r-o m any s~cial
i rr .. Jrov:n1c nt di~t.ric t and , furthe r, t ," ...... t major I'~pa irs of s.1cn s treet a t t , i..<i t ime
nrc not no c c~~a ry .
D::w
1-icr-~ s l.lo
{,,.},5.,.7g
Si,:na tu rc of
.,r .... ~rty Owne r :
. .-..---·-----·---O...L-U~
I >:, "lin.; .\ td:-c:is o
?r op.1 r !.,y ;.vner :
I, UJ e. 1>141~'1.dA
~)~.~/(0
u : l Ou:;c r iption of
,'ro;>e rty :
N/2 of BLK 25 EX PA R RF.PLATTED
ll. POR OF BLK 26 oi;;sc AS BE:G NE
CCR OF BLK 26 TH W lil .5 FT TH
S 101 .-~8 F T TH w 58 .S FT TH
~~..l'.~~TT~N
150 FT TO BEG Y LE HTS
620 E AMHE RST PL
Aw.. BLK ·2 9 YALE-HT.:i & TrlAT 'lU · 3t.1 C.
/-)..')·7i if;_~ ( /:U ··~ ... ._.,. __ ..,.,
i> HT OF B.LK.:i 26 '!, 28 DE.3C AS
HE T .:i ,i CUR UF BLIC 26 TH N
lbO FT TH# 58 FT TO Pr ON
->~LY L E F-VAC CITY DI'ltH
Ttt , iX A.1,G 3 0 LINE 88 ,95 FT
Tu PT 85 .2 FT .:i OF N LINE OF
BLK 26 TH NE:LY LG SO L'fE
lJ ,02 FT TO PT 75 FT::; OF N
LTNE OF -BIB -26 & 2 3 FT E OF W
i..I 'TH S 235 FT TH,/ 10 PT TO
B~G e:JC S 10 FT FOR RD YA R HT3
L ,.
(, 1~~~i.,=7
.c~ '~*~
C • <' ft /{,<'-7/l,4. ->
•
2. 'A I ?, S", f..._..,_-:.&. S 50 FT OF ,/ 1/2 OF TR 5
LEW INN EK3 RES YALE tULL
~JqllO
;ztf3? ~ ~ LOT 8 BLK 5 YA LE: MANOR
·L~~
l
;2 8' S' 7 .l,. \.......l<:C.-.~~L ~LOT 7 Bu< 5 YALE MANOR
~~,
:?t~> 4, /PX ·>1,
4~ ,....;,< ,• e,
N 50 FT OF N 10 0 FT
OF BLK 11& YALE HTS
2A20 S PE:NN ST
,., I • •
•
Pa ge 4 of 6
P E T I T I u :1
\v,1 , t 10 un:ic r s i .3no , o>mc r'r, of prope rty ac · :-i e the 500 , 600 , and 700 blocks of
~ st Am, e r .,;-:. P :i c e , or a jaccn!:. prop;:,rty faci n,; l':a s t Amh:l r st Place , in En g l e wo od ,
Co :>rajo , nc roby do ;ictition ti City Co cil of the City of En g l e wo od , t o str i.,:e
fNm its :lez olut ·on It (Ser.;.e s 197 8 ) a 1 propose stree t , walk , curb , a nd gutter
r e;i.:ii rs , i:iclu ine t r ee molnstat·on , r e l atin g to Sast Amh.'3 r st ?lace .
It is ou:-po.;· tion tn t a 1 payments f or ::,uc repair s on suc h street
5. oul::i come from gen,?ra tax ruven s of tne City , and no t from any spac ial
i n-:.i rov;:,inc nt istric t and , furt:,•r, t t maj or r epa irs of s.ich s treet at tnis time
arc noL r,c c c ssa :-y .
DrtW
3i:nc
I -J -7
•
Sir,na tur e of
ro p;;r ty Ow:1c r :
r'.ail"nr: Arld :-es s of
?rope rty Owne r :
i;:)gal De:ic r lption of
?r'o pe r ty :
Lot 4, Bloc k 5, Yale Manor
Lot 10 , Block 6 , Yale Man or
-..
I • •
•
Pa ge 5 of 6
PC:TI Ti u.
, c , t; c undc r s i i::nc , ow n ers of pro pe r t y :· ... ,: Lnc t e 500 , 6 00, .:i nd 700 b eeks of
:!.as t . m: e r.:;t P ac e , or adj cent prO [>-:)rty fa c ing Ea st A:nhe rs t Plac e , in En ,l n ;.i ood ,
C;i o r :ijo, nc r cby d o pc t it" on ti.J Ci t :, Co W1c il of the City of En g l ewood, to stri..'<e
f ror.i its ~e solut ion fl (Se r ies 1978 ) a 1 prop osed stree t, wa k , c urb , and gu tter
a,Jair s , includ ing tree n:o ostation, r e atin Lo S .:i st Amhe r st Place .
It is ou:-posi t ion th t a 1 ;,;i:r.r,e n t s for J JC r e pa i r s on such street
s:10 l:i co:::e fro m gen,ff:..l t ax revenues of the CiLy , and not from any s pe cial
i r,.>rov:)mc n t dis t ric t and , furt he r , t ha t majoi-r<.)pa irs of S •Jch s tre et at this time
n~~ nol ~eccssa r y .
De t.e
S i (:ned :
•
S ir,na t u re or
Pro p:,r t y Owne r :
>: il ·n ~ A ld r-es s of
?r optJrt.y Own'cl r :
In , 1 Dci::c r iption of
Pro pe r ty :
I ThA T PAR'l' OF BLK 28 YALE tlT:3
.$ S <J t. r\t.._\~t f · DESC AS BE G 198 FT E OF NW COR
OF Ll< 28 TH S 150 FT T H E 1'J
£ I \ I GEN INE OF VAC CITY DITCH TH
l'. 0( \1<) '~, S::.o O, NE!.Y ALG SD C/L TO PT 20 FT W -
rl OF E LINE OF BLK 28 TH N TON
LINE , TH 65 FT TO BEG
550 E AMHERST PL
I • •
•
Pa ge 6 of 6
t .:(l 1..n::.J :-~·..;r.c d , ow ner., of property fac i.t; t he SOO , 600 , and 700 bloc~s of
.::.:..st. .~;;. .. e r .:.:. ? .:.c ~, o adjacant p:--o perty facin g :.::ts t A:n h:::rst Place , in En g l AWOO(,
C:,2.i,:.do , :-:~r -:?by d o ;ictition t t:e Ci t y Council of the City of Englewood, to s tri.'<e
::-on · t s :l e::.olution .1 (Se r:;.c 97 3 ) all pro,Jo.:e:-. ztree t , wa k , curb , and gutter
r.,,n. rs , including tre-:i mole tation, r elating t o Sast Am he r st ?lace .
I t is ou:-position th t all p yment s f or :, ch r e pairs o n such street
:i ::o l:t comc fro m gc n,ff,,l tax re venue:, of the City, and n ot from any s ;x,c i·l
i n .J:--o :-,rcrn 0 n-:. i trict. and , furt:1Cr , t : -t maj or :-e ;,air.:> or s.ich s tre et t tnis time
. r~ n o t, ne c e ssary.
Da t.c
s·;;ne d :
Signature of
Pro p.;rty Ow:ie r-:
------· -----.. --
1-Jl.J. 7 8-
•
~: ili n;r . !~!r css of
?rop~r Ly OwnS?r:
iJi r, De.:;:: r i:,tion of
?ro;,e r ty :
-----------ur;4L DES CP r Pffo'I _____ _
d'dt>«-·-r ·--~ _T R_ f"iE A.3.___BL~ 6 YA U: MM,flR
R E I IIJ G A~ '.J\JJ '10EHD LOT I N YALE __ _
~ '1A 'I OR G PA P T QF F>.Ll<S "l6 r. 28
_YA L_E _':!._T_S__Q_E S C_ AS Bf0 r. 1 11 .5 F T k
OF NE co~ 'lF '3L <·--i 6 YALE-t"TS-----
TH S 101.2 a FT TH 1-1 513.5 i:r Tl4
~. 2 ~-F_T _T_Q _P L..9~5E L Y_ LI NE
OF VhC C IT Y DITCH r,.-1 N E LY -ti lr. __ _
.\ SO l l NE TO ti Pr 1,/1-1 ! CH I S 7 5 F T
\ _s _~~L.9~l!NE OF sr. Pli< U,
, TH w TO A of-T3i=r { O F-w \ r°NE-· 111,
\ OF BLK 2S TH N TO C /L OF S O '
~rrv l)ffCH TH_SI-ILY_f\lr, so Cit
. TO A PT 20 FT 1-1 OF E LINE-OF -
.B LK 28 T~ N TON LI NE QF J>.LK
_U_!~_F.,_lQI. 5 Ff TO flE G
& 'I ;2 f. A..,.A,-, ,T /" /
lf,.,,,J /.-",1 "' d', Co .
i't1 ((c;
'MO E A'4HEQST Pl -------------
Lor 13 -Bl~-~ -
'f4Lt: "1,,-~{fii
~
~-· ~-· ~·-·-----.--------
I • •
I n r-,
6 -75.·
3u .:i.no
.n
:{
_."." --· ...... · .... :-~ , ..
•
/·.·:.2
;. ,..2-:-~ r ,-~ --........
1 ''
}
•
• -
-S·i4 -75
T i3....(01 0
L/1:,!,n e, of P.:N I I I •
</' /·'·;&;<o r, I ..., ,s,r. -·. --,a.-
?,'y,1."Zl/<s. Cr~c.h/'/9 ct.A!.\:2..-!-::.,-,ii1 Ge.,'\c,,..:J U:r.,:,1.-l,d,-h:"v,,,.. -6oc,..:...
·'I,
'I
I'
I ,
;t , ..
,, '
. .I I ,
·' ··1
I
,I,
. j}.
-----· . ., . C / __ .-;:_-.4 .. ~ -·.·.-----._ .. · __ ... ____ ~ .. ·
•
,:r
I • •
-
'
, ..
I
I ! .
\
•
• •
4 -l~-75 -., ...1.... {;)u~.~J
G..,.::.,\rr,'r,.:,,-,_,-:-:)\ L ~'I :::~ -,-1 • / • -., n
... \ •·
11
10 -0 --:.6:.... ...... ,p 1n ~.or 1'"2.i''\n,
h ~p. J l '
2:i."'e. ,.,.
Su.~r.:c.d.2. 5 1,c;"Jl 0-o..y Sa~d
~·~r.
.-,~
.Yz..."
8"
The a bov e copy o r a 11 so11 t.e3'.11 ..;.13 :>r o·,M•.ri o· Jan . l7 , 1Q7=\ ~-,r .-Pl da .. ""Or,·:n",
Di r ect.or of ?ub lL: '"o:-J re oor t.3 2 t~.:;t no!."'S i1 t.re .itr .... ;,,~ o!' 6""1"'1 B :rk o~
:=:as t A,·,,J1c !"st ?~ace , i',it9 on 4 pr.d 1 ., 19_:. .
Tn,.--. tni.::k ness of •#n'! '1 p·• • ::u fou ;t tot 7 iric'"'"3 J.·.1 ~ 1. .. ~!.e>,. ("'ni"l
comr i 0 s wi n ·.:111 • -i.~c:. t,.1..1i:1 -,, ,,..,. y .... 1 #1:-':! t j' ~n .. le..,oo1 . )
·;o·, Lnf' a-!1-;1rse w13 f oun1 i'"I ',1~ 11 .J:J',~r1:~·· soil.
-I
I
I
I
I
i
T:o UH_el".a r KS~. in-1jel to :s ,Oi tr.it • ·a.nnrai ::rm'iiti o ., of•:.» :;•r ,..'J:. ... '.ls ooor .
•.• .. 1111'1.JhOrte r S:t.3~.l.d t.r:.at. no t.'!.J:.'i ... n-•, "Ji') Ort. .• ~ /'1'J .J.."le (, ._ti, i '\ '"'J,130!11ble t o
C.Jn:.,•.l'l'J t..tJ.t. t.n.:. t.:i'L: c-ori.1t.rJ:t.io:-; '3·,1 .c~:.1n· .. z i 1 ~.J, o'.." •ne 7 J :;'l~ ... , i<J at.
~aas · a3 roo1 aa !..n!J ~ "l) l: ~c".::.)
. 1,•
I • •
J
•
• •
copy to W. D. James, Finance Director
RECEIVED l .
DEPT. Of FINMiCE
ENGl.f.WOOD
City of Englewood
•
January 13, 1978
Dear Englewood Citizen:
3400 S. Elati Street
Englewood , Colorado 80110
Phone (303) 761 -1140
The City Council has adopted a resolution describing the
City's intent to form Paving District No. 25. This District
will be formed for the purpose of construction and improving
curbs, sidewalks, and paving on cPrtain streets and alleys in
your neighborhood and throughout the City during the summer of
1978. The cost for such improvements will be assessed against
the property to be benefitted by these improvements.
Your property will be affected by these improvements, and we
invite you to review the attached resolution. You may have
seen, or will see, markings on your curbs, sidewalks or trees
that are scheduled for removal. There are times during the
course of construction that changes in removal quantities may
have to be made.
May we request that you make any inquiries regarding the Paving
District by calling our Engineering staff at City Hall, 761-1140,
Ext. 220.
You are invited to attend a public hearing on the formation of
this Paving District on January 30, 1978, at 7:30 o'clock p.m.
in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, 3400 South Elati
Street. At this hearing, you will be invited to make any com-
ments , pro or con, regarding the improvment of streets, the cost
of which would affect your property.
Sincerely,
r.:~W~P.E.
Director of Public Works
KW/lo
Attachs.
REPLY I CERTAINLY WOULD BE PLEASED
IF THE ALLEY IN THE 3700
BLOCK BETWEEN BROADWAY & c'2~~VED.
CLEO HICKMAN
3798 South Broadway
•
I • •
-
Mr. Andy McCown, Manager
City of Englewood
Dear Mr. McCown:
J
•
• -
; r; 1J 10
-' .L.
Donna Wei tzel
3775 South Lincoln
Englewood, Colorado
80110
January 30, 1978
Due to a prior family conmitment I am unable to attend the hearing
tonight concerning the paving of certain areas of our city. Wishing to
express my opinions however I am writing this letter which, hopefully, will
receive your consideration and be treated as a "voice" at the meeting.
As you will note from my address I reside in an area which is being
considered for alley-paving. I am as great an ecologist as the next person
desiring to maintain and promote beautification of our city. I,too, dislike
the clouds of dust that roll long after the sanitation trucks have passed by,
however the proposed costs are certainly outlandish!
We are very well aware of the increase in the cost of living, our recent
water bills reflect this very markedly as do the Public Service, grocery and
automotive expenses. Construction and building costs admittedly have also
sky-rocketed, undoubtedly your conmittee accepted the very lowest possible
bid --but, I still must postest.
The proposed cost quoted by the engineer to my neighbor of $900 for a
two-lot property seems ridiculously high to me. Some neighbors report their
estimate to be $2000 . That's incredible! I realize we could pay over a period
of years but that, of course, would just increase the cost when you figure the
interest.
When property owners are to be asseseed for the total costs and I under-
s tand this is the case regarding alleys, I believe their feelings ou ght to be
considered. There are just too many other places right now in our household
for every single penny. I simply do not have the resources to spend that much
money on the alley! We have a garage which is used only for storage and there-
fore do not use the alley. The o~ly reason I can think of for paving it would
be to eliminate the mud (dust we s hall always h ave with us!). The estimated
expense i s far beyond the worth in my opinion. Therefore I am formally and
emphatically objecting to the pavement of the 3700 block alley between South
Broadway and South Lincoln streets .
A petition of other neighbors who share my opinion will be presented at
the hearing. Thank you very much for your consideration in this important
matter.
Very truly yours,
~J?~~~e .-....... ===========---"""'--------• •
I • •
J
• -
• -
Jabuary , 197 8
lle , t he undersi gned , to here by prot"st the pl•n of t he ciL o f
Eng l el'lood t o pave the alley be t we en Broar•ray ~nrl Sout h Li nc oln
(t he 3700 block) a nd a sse s s the c ost s e stima t e d by the eng ineer
of $9 0 0 to $2 10 0 to t he pro r e rt y owne rs o
S IGtJA TURE : AD')RE S~ .... __
# //Jl~ · ~ . ma i. LJ!.
/7 -;c//J~fL 37s7--k, Y~
~ fatr £11411~~ J '17 ( ~ ~
Th3 nk Yo u f or yo ui c on side r 1tion! ! I . .
• •
J
• -
•
,· •
0
G ') I 11 ) ~
,} • , 'J J
....
WE THE PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY OF 4000 BLOCK SOU 'l'H LINCOLN & BROADWAY, ENGLEWOOD, COLO.
DO NOT WANT THE ALLEY TO BE PAVED.
I . .!
1:. l J J ~ -;t (,. ;:J .._/-, :,_ L;' <:; )_"'J_ I..U, '{ Jv {J
' -
. • .:. " ,"'I .; l?
' " ·~i, .. ' ,:: •.. J t_' -t,. ...
• •
•
J
•
• -
• •
RECEIVED
JAN 2 7 1~78
Dm. OF FINANCE
DIGL£W00D
•
J
•
• •
0
.
WE THE PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY or 4000 BLOCK SOUTH LINCOLN & BROADWAY, ENGLEWOOD, COLO.
~ NOT WANT THE ALLEY TO BE PAVED.
.
DATE
I 11./·1[ t, J n ~ A ) J -L A LL JJ /)fl :::r lTV\
ADI -:L43 3 -3~ ~ f ~ ~~\4-ML -
U ?~S t T. ~ r. .JI·-~ oJ,.. , ~ t-<,.l, ,r {) I //>
u 7 V
I
' •
\. • •
J
•
• •
• •
0
RECEIVED
JAN 2 7 19 70
DEPT. Of FINANCE
£NGLEWOOO
• •
J
•
• •
January JO , 197?
To the City Council of Englewo od :
W1th reference to the proposed alley paving designated as
Paving District No. ?5, in part1cular alley paving between
South Broadway and Lincoln Streets, and East Nassau to East
Oxford ,\ve nue, although T am making these comments only for
myself and my w1fe, T feel sure that all of those at this
meeting who will be charged an appreciable eaount for this
paving are in agreement with IIIY v1ew on this matter.
Personally, ram retired from an active business life, and
receiving modest social security payments. ~ile my w1fe is
emp oyed, these are difficult times for us financially, as I
am sure they are for others here concerned with th1s prospective
addition to our already burdensome cost of living. our cost
of Englewood water service has recently been nearly doubled,
gas and utilities costs have skyrocketed ln spite of drast1c
conservation measures, and property taxe s have almost quadruple~
during our many years of residence here. All of us are keenly
aware it is becoming increasingly difficult to make our income
cover our living expenses, Particularly is th1s true of those
o f us who are on fixed incomes that do not 1.ncrease as inflation
adds more and more to our cost of l i ving.
Not on e of t he residential properties concerned use alley access
to their garages, and a n 1nveet\gat1on of the use of this alley
by vehicular traffic will show there 1e insufficient travel there
to justify th1s paving expenditure, Even the commercial
businesses involved almost entirely use the Broadway entrances
for access to their properties .
Tn the interest of conservation of runaway 1nflat1onary costs
1n these times of uncert.a1nty about the future, tnvolv1ng all
c1t1zene of Englewood, and 1n all areas of our city management,
suggest a moratorium that includes not only the alley pav1ng
above referred to, but addit onally on all mun1c1pel expenses
which are not vitally necessary to the welfare of our community
should be put 1nto effect .
T beli e ve serious consi de ration should be given by the Englewood
City Council to the presence here of he property O'.mers opposed
to Paving D1str1ct ?5 as specified above, at the appreciable cost
to those of us involved, and that the Council should rescind
the paving order for this area now in effect .
El mer J . Schlageter
401 5 so . Lincoln s t.
Respectfully
~~
•
submitted,
:ft2r/ I • •
-
..
f / '':'., t,_ ... ,
/-t ; C vY\.,
•
J
To the Englewood ,ity vouncil:
•
• •
;& , ,. , ~ Yz 7 In:. c:! / "';r
:o
vie ,. the undersigned property own e rs o f the ...320.CL
Block South Delaware Street L do ~retest the proposed
~treet paving of our block .
Name Address
·1 f? -J-<i b~LJ-JU
~ 7-~J ~ ct: ~7?VIL
5 Ir::;
, ( I/ n (
•
I • •
•
J
•
• •
To the En g lewood City Council:
e , the unde rsi gned property owners o f the 3200
Block South De l a ware Street , do p r o t e s t t he proposed
street paving of our block .
1 :J ,.,
d :lei
... 5~(11
3 -7 ~
~) ,' -,
)
....,
.k
l'
JL>
-,
/
A&zu.'-tt ·,,,,
~u ...u..-'it-t.c_,;
J)<.?..?e~ <.-'C
RECEIVED
JAN 2 7 197'3
DEPT. OF FINANCE
ENGLEWOOD
•
I . .
n
•
Ci ty of .... n0 lew ood
3 4 00 3 . Lla ti 3tre e t
~ncl ewood , Colo . 8011 0
Dear .. r . ,1ar;,oner :
J
•
• -
C-le n:>1 •. Dorl::-on
17 0 5 1ar ·
Gr e t Be:'ld , i ~~P~ 675~~
J nuary ?4 , 1_078
Th is let ter is i:'1 re car s to the n ot i ce ~e r e ceived f rom you
date d January 1 7., 1978 .
,,e wi sr.. t:, info r m yo u tha t ',rn are d e fini t e · a r ainst the Ci t 's
intr t to f orm Paving Di s t r i c t li o , 2 5 . :e d o not fe e th a
this is ne c ess ary to imp r ov e our nei phborhoo •
.:i inc e we will n ot be abl e to a tte7:d t he :1 earing on Jan ar 30 , 978 ,
we d o ?ant y ou t o kn w our fe elin s abo ut it .
Sin c erely ,
Le ·;a l de scri pt ion
Lot s ~ive (5 ) a nd 3 ix (6 ), Blo c k On e (1)
Park ,,ddi ti on
.:,t rect add res s ~262 J outh Delaw a r e 3 r ret
u 1 le~ood , Col o . 80110
•
RECEIVED
JAN 2 7 19 't J
DEPT. OF FINANCE
.ENGI.EWOOD I • •
n
J
•
• •
2-? C-5, 5/, e $'/.. n-,...,,__
?V .£ n v ~ s /-;r, e-0+ s
/((cd /1 n l44-y h o ( f
J
-I L<-->---JJs b er7
G t ~ , ~-e L u--iJ~Ju7
!),~l C /"'j. ,/ /L_
r-v I ~') tn.._ 511--o °5 h..,-,.._ ~
)? 0 r (!--60-,,,,.. r ..----/'
)?-v; .-~
•
0
I . •
_I
•
-
E NGLEWOOD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
180 \Nest G i rard A venue · Englewood, Colorado 80110
Phone (3031 781-7 8 3 8
'.11-/
l -,,·
LAND USE COUNCIL Tuesd a y, No vember 13, 1973
Northeast Industrial Park Task Force
Director Jim Chandler, Chairman
9 :00 A. M., Chamber Building
Attendance1
--.Jim Chandler, Gateway Safety Products -1'-1-o'-.So
Brad Pclsue ~ Allen E. Beavers, T. A. Pelsue Comp any
Weldon Kite, Weldon Kite Company
Norbert Vogler, B. V. Machine Company, Inc.
Wayne Ragsdale, Ragsdale Bros. Tool~ Die, Inc.
Louis Byrd, Continenta l Air Conditioning, Inc.
Ben Edgin, Ben Edgin Painting Company
Ole V. Ebbesen, Modern Plastic Lamina ting Company
Wayne Snider, Fiberglassics
~Walt Freeman, Freeman Fuel~ Appliance -7Ef-rfl3L
~d Jrad,., Bn•,r Coltp<ir&U<i~ -7 B 1-tl'l7;J.
.. Wayne~ton, T.H.E. Tool Comp any -7Z.'Z-,s-,,
~Ea rl and Harold Stoner;-=stoner's Wrecking Yard
'71.t-0017 Dick Russell or Jack Brennan, Englewood Industrial Park 0
Gene Ihly, Ihly Industries, Inc.
Bill Kilpatrick, Kilpatri ck Associa t e s , Inc.
Pr op osa l on Industrial Stre et Pl a n
ON T"""e 2 fe; B,ec.< 0 ~
I •
-
0
'. FCEl v'ED
.. '.''
0 71970
:TY 1.:1 ~ R orr .
H. _1.:'.!'.)
I
J
•
• -
,,
!
(
I ' 2 7 l 78
• •
t
" ,
0
0
t
I • •
n
•
J
•
• -
~T, nu r y ]0 78
To the flerrbe r s of t he P'ng lewood City Coun il :
I Rm .., r e,ident o f S outh "'Rshi n ,;ton Ctr c le . I r\o
not believe U1 P t thi s circle r-n d South 11 ·.q s n jngton
ftrePt n eed pn ving . In my opinion :1 t is n ost
unfRir to i n clu d e th i s Rr e _n a p vj ng istr'c t .
It is less t hR n ~u y e n r s 3g o t i&t t e t Rxpnyer! of
this neighbor h ood p , id n con s i d e r a bl e s u n, of noney f ,r
the re pla cerr.ent of s i d ew l ks . The xpens e of s t r ee
pP ving would prove ct m i r dship f o r tlle a v erc,ge t XJ ey er ..
t eed l ess t o s 11y , I a m very much o ppo s ed to ny incr e r~~e
in loc n J t ?xes .
r ~, Di tm "r s
640 Eouth Vhi shing t o n Cir cle
[~f:CEiVED
r· iY l. ,;r;;sJ ~ ;1·., v1-, .~ t-
1 r, r1,,1t1n
•
I • •
In n
)
•
• •
• •
-r e -··--/\ : . ~ i t ,_ l.J
I, . 3 0 i978
'l,1' i." • •· "',;:~·3 v,,1 ,l'i
Ii;~ [1,,J(;D
I . .
In ,.,.
J
•
• •
0
0
. .
~y,r't'« ~ '7 ~~
do <?-J) . ~ e2 .r . 0
I . .
• In
J
• ......
• •
PROPOSED STREETS FOR PAVING DISTRICT #2 5
1
500-700 Ea st Amherst Place (ove rlay)
400-600 West Bates Avenue (Industrial)
Alle y East of 3700 South Broadway (alley)
Alley East of 4000 South Broadway (alley)
Alley East of 4700 South Broadway (alley)
000-100 East Centennial Avenue (Residential)
•
1900 West Cornell Avenue (Industrial) I • •
I
• •
J
•
• •
-2-
PROPOSE D STRE ETS FO R PAVIN G DI S TR I CT # 2 5
3000 Sout h Da r tmouth Ci r cle (o v e rlay)
3200 South Delaware Street (Residential)
4100 South Elati Street (overlay)
3000 South Fox Street (Residential)
4000 South Galapago Street (Residential)
• 4100 South Huron Stree t (Res idential)
•
100 East Layton Avenue (Residential) I • •
• • n
J
•
• •
-3-
PROPOSED STREETS FOR PAVING DISTRICT #25
400 East Layton Av enue (Residential)
600-800 West Oxford Avenue (Residenti al)
4500 South Pearl Street (overlay)
200 West Princeton Avenue (Residential)
1 00-300 East Princeton Avenue (Residential)
• 2900 South Shoshone Street (Special Industrial)
•
2900-3000 South Umatilla Street (Special Industrial) I • •
((I
• -----------~----------~ •
J
• -
• •
-4-
PROPOSED STREETS FOR PAVING DISTRICT #25
t 000-400 East Union Av e nue (R esidential)
2900-3000 South Vallejo Street (Special Industrial)
5000 South Washington Street (overlay)
600 East Washington Circle (overlay)
2000-2300 West Wesley Avenue (Residential)
2900-3000 South Wyandot Street (Special Industrial)
• I •
(
• •
•
J
•
• -
PROPOSED PAVING DISTRICT
•
-For Construct ion
~ Overlay
.. ..,1,-·--· ---·.,, ·-· ltl .. lMD , .... JIii ....
//-lt -1 1
J>.L./.
I . •
•
J
•
• •
sc111 p~t'O~!NG DISTRICT N~
MO:mA Y , Uovcmber 2 1 , 1977
TUESDAY , December 20 , 1977
TUESDAY, January 3 , 197 8
WEDNESD AY , .J a nuary 11, 1978
F RIDAY, Jana u r y 1 3 , 1 978
WJ~ONESDAY, J an ua r y l 8, 1978
WED NE SD AY, J anuary 25 , 1978
MONDAY , January 3 0 , 1 97 8
MOND AY, February 6 , 1 9 78
\,\,'CONtSDAY, February 8 , 1 978
TUE SDAY, Febr uary 2 1, 1978
'1\'EDN £SDA Y, March 1, 1 9 78
FRIDAY, March 3 1, 1978
MONDAY, April 3 , 1978
MONDAY, Ap r i l 3 , 1 9 78
WCDNES DAY , April 5, 1978
MONDAY , April 1 0 , 1978
THURSD AY, Apr1.l 13, 1 9 78
THU RSDAY, Ap n .l 20 , 1978
WE ONCSOAY, Ap ril 26 , 1 9 78
WEONC SDAY, Apr il 26 , 1978
MONDAY, Ma y 1, 1 9 78
WCONCSDAY , May 3, 1978
MONDAY, Ma y 1 5 , 1978
Tl1ESDAY, Ma y 16 , 1 978
W"EDNESDAY , May 17, 1378
THURSDAY, June 15 , 1978
TUESDAY, Septef'lber 1 2, 1978
AAK/ldo
11 -1 5 -77
List o f s treets availa l e f o r Cuunc1l
!;elt:c ting firm (or fis ca l servi ces and bond
hnnd l ing
C'on~1d.._r r eso lu t ion o f 1utent to f o 1m Pd Vt ng
Dl!',,tTlct No . 25.
First publ 1c ation o f r~ot1ce
J.:a1l notice o! i nc lu sion in D1&':'r 1c t ar.d pt.b-
1 ic hcanng to all a ffected pr ... ~r y o e rs.
Second publ1 cauon o f notice
Th1.rd pu lica 10n of no i c e
Pub l ic hea ring on forrnat.ion o f D1st.r 1.c t (Spe-
c ia l Mtg .) @ 7:J O p.m.
I ntroduc:t ton o f a b i 11 !or an ordinance
c r e a ting t he District
Publica tion o f bi.11 fo r o r dinance
Final r ead1 ng of bill f o r ordinance; public
hea ring on final p assage o! o r d i na nce
Pub lish as an o rdinance.
Or di nanc e in full force a nd e ff e ct
Curb, gutte.r, s i d e wal k pe rmit c ut-off date
Notice t o contractor s , and bond s ale autho r ized
Publ ish fir s t no tic e to contracto rs a n d bond
ho u ses.
P lans and Sp e ci f icat i ons a vailable
Second notice t o contra c o r s and bond houses
Th i rd n o t ice to cont.r actors and bond houses
F inal date for pr1 va t e concr ete Const.
Open construc t.ion bids at 2 :00 p .m.
Open bond bids @ 2:00 p .m.; awa r d cont rac t;
i ntroduce bill for ordinance t o iss ue and
sell bonds (bonds dated June 1st).
Publica t ion o f bi 11 t o sel l bonds
Passa ge of ordinance on fina l r e ading
Est. da te o f start o f construction
Publ ish as an o rdinance following final passa g e.
Ord1.nan ce in full e f fect -Pr oceeds o f bond s
rece i ved
Est. date of completion of proJec t
•
0~ \ I
I • •
,.. .... n
J
•
• -
City of Englewood
January 13, 19 78
Dea r Englewood Citizen:
3400 S. Elati Street
Englewood , Co lorado 801 t 0
Phone (3 03 ) 761-1140
The City Council has adopted a resolution describing the
City 's i ntent to form Paving District No. 25. This District
will be formed for the pu rpose of construction and imp r oving
curbs , sidewal ks , and paving on certain stree ts and alleys in
your neighborh ood and throughout the City dur ing the summ er of
1978 . The co st for such improvements will be assessed again s t
the property to be benefi tted by these improvemen ts.
Your property will be affe cted by these i mprove me nts, and we
invite you to review the attached resolution. You may have
seen , or will see , markings on your curbs, sidewalks or trees
that are scheduled for removal . There are times durin g the
course of construction that changes in removal quantiti e s may
have to be made.
May we request that you make any i nquiri es regarding the Pavin g
District by calling o ur Engineering staff at City Hall, 761-1140,
Ext. 220 .
You are inv ited to attend a public hearing on the formation of
this Paving District on Janua r y 30 , 1978, at 7 :30 o 'clock p.m.
in the City Council Chambers in City Hall, 3400 South Elati
Street . At th i s hearing, you will be invited to make any com-
ments , pro or con, regarding the improvrnent of streets, the cost
of which would affect yo u r property .
Sincerely ,
Z,~W~P.E.
Director of Pub lic Works
KW/lo
I Attachs .
• ----------------------.=--
I • •
\ •
J
•
• -
r • .• ·.'···.:· . ..: ....... ' ....... ,, ; •• 4 • •• : .... ·:.·.:..:.:.> ..
·:· ... ·
/ 1£ . .1;· >.
ru:SOLUT ION NO. . . / SI:RIES 197 1 v.•
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENT ION OF THE .,.
CITY COUNCIL 01' ENGLEliOOD, COLORJ\00, TO CREA TE
A SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT IN THE CITY TO .
BE DESIGNATE D 115 PAVING DI STRICT NO. 25,
AOOPTI!l G DETAILS AllO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THII
PROPO SE D DISTRICT, ANO ORDER ING PUBLICATION
· . .-;.<. ·-/·\
ANO HAILING OF NOTICE ·oF HEAR ING TO THE OWNER S
OF THE PROPERT Y TO BE A
0
S SESSE D FOR IMPROVE/'IENTS ·
IH SAID DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, the City Council of Englewood, Colora·do,.
'· "
has determined that it is necess ary to create A special i morove-.
ment di strict within th e C ity, for the p urpos e ot c onstruc~inJ
and .installing street paving, curb and gutte r 6 ll d sidewalk· im-
provemen t s, togethe~ with ~ecess a..ry in cidental s , on c e rtain
streets and avenu es as se t f orth i n this r e s oluti o n, and to
... ·ssesa the cost o f the improvements against t he prop~rty
special ly ben efited by the i mprovements and included within
the di&trict1 and
WHER EAS, pursuant to the Charter of the City and
Chapter 14 of the Mun i cipa~ tod~ Ht l~e tity, the City Council
has determined to .construct and install .such improvements,
provided however, that the City Council shall consider all .
protests and objections that may be made in connection with the
proposed improvEments, before ordering the construction thereof:
and
' WHEREAS , pursuant to an ,order of the City Council, the
Engineer of the City for the propo s ed special improvem ent pro-
ject has prepared and filed preliminary pl,~a, specificatio~a,
estimates of cost, ma ps and s ched ules for Ul~ proposed im-
provemen ts1
BI: IT RESOLVI:D BY THE C ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
I
ENGLEWOOD, CO LORAD O:
l. That the City Counci l has determined t.her e exists
a necessity for the construction Bnd in s tBllation o( the street
paving, curb and gu tter a n d sidewalk i mprovc~~nts, t o gether with
necessary incidentals, on those st;eets iand avenu e s ·~·hich iare
mor e particularly set forth in the ~otice of he~ri n g , and to
cre ate a specia l improvement district for such pur p ose.
2. Tha t the Engineer's reports , together with the
preliminary details, specifications, estimates of cost, ~aps
and schedules prepared and fil e d with the City Clerk be a n d
the same are hereby approve d and adopte d by the City Counci l
for use in the construc tio n an d ins;allation of the improve ments
to be mode in sai d i mprovement district.
-l
•
. .
·•, ..
I • •
n
-
•
•
J
•
• -
:, ... ·. '-\ .. -· :'' .· ....... . ""' .J~-·-···-··
:.:. ,f
_, ...... -
. ' .
" .• .. I l!...;, •·.· ~ ·'·
3, Tha t mate rials t o be used in constructin9 and
· ·., installin9 the proposed improvements are 6tated in the J;oti c e
hereinafter set forth,
. '
\
. --t
4, That tho a ss essments to be levi ed against th e .
property to b~ inclu ded within ~e di6tr.ict, f or 6 a i d i mprove--,: · .'
ments , shall be due and payable within thirty d ay s !rom and
after the !lna'l publi ca tion of the . o rdinance assc ssi n9 the whol e ·
actual cost of said improv ements ag ainst the real property i n
6aid district, provided , however, that· any owner ..,h o sh a ll pay
the en tire am ount of the as s essment within said p e xiod of time ,
6h all be entltled to an allowance of S I o f the a moun t of the
a&sessme nt. In the event any owne r of r eal estate sh a ll !a 1
to pay the whole of such ass essme n t a9a inst h is property within
s aid thirty d ays , then the whole cos t o f said improvemen t. so
asse ssed against his property shal l be payable in ten (1 0),
equa l annual installments of as sessments, The interest r ate
on th e unpaid installme nts ~f a ssessments will be established
by ordinance to be /'dopted b y Ll ic ,·_; ty Council at a later date.
Th e first of s a id installments of principa l a n d ·inte r es t shall
ba due and payable a t such time as ma y b e determined in and
by the a ssessment ordinance, and the r em ainder of the annu al
in•tallments o f princi pal and interest shal l be d ue a n d payable
•ucce ssively on the same day in each yea r there after un til all
a r e p a i d in full-
s. That th e prope r t y to be a ssessed !or 6aid im-
provements shall be the prope rty 6peci ally benefited by sai d
improvements a nd included with in the i mprovement district,
and more p~rticularly described in the Notice herein after set
fo rth.
6. That th ere shall be p r e pa red an 9 rdinance
creatih9 within the corporate l i mits of t he Ci ty, a specia l
impro vement district to be kn o~n as Fa vi n9 Dis rict No. 25,
providi n9 for he construe ion a nd in st alla t ion of the i mprove-
ments, all as des cr ibed in t h is Resolution , end in a ccord~nce
with the preliminary report, plans, maps, ~p e ci!ications, deta i l&
and e s t imates of co s ts of the Engineer, herein refe r red to ~nd
now on f ile i n the of!ice of the Director of Public Wo rk s .
The proposed ordinance will be c onsidered for passa9e on fi rst
reading by the City Council at a re9ular meeting thereof to be
held on February 6, 1978.
-2 -
I .
-------------···-------.. ------==
'.
'
.,
I • •
n
-
•
•
•
J
•
• -
. ~--":, ... -., ;·,.\', ·i :; ' -. : .. , .. .. ,,-:•-..... -... -. . ~ \' -· : ....... ..-, ' •• _ ... "!" ;.
.. ·:
. ,, . ~;.. -
7. Notice of the public hcarin9 on the crca !on o f .
the district 6hal l be publiched once a week for lhrce wccka
in thfJ tnglew6od Herald Sentinel, a n~wspa.per of 9en~ra1 -:· :..~= '.·.1.i -~ '1. ::t":i"~·~
circulation in the City. In llddition, a copy of . such notic_.,. ::_-.:; .. ,-::, . . .. " l ·.
s hall be mailed, postage prepaid, to ea'ch known owner ·ot "'· ..... :·; ~ .. -~ .. ~
r~al ,property within ·the propos e~. distri;;t. . , .. : .. ,: . , . , /~ :,: · ~ ·.
The published notice shall bo in substantially ·:~;.~/; . ;··'
the followin9 fonu, ,·... : : -.~-~;'\~--
-3 -
•
,
'
-•' .
.'•
-----·---. ------
I • •
•
•
•
j
•
• •
~ t ...... :'\..i..,. . .... .r J ·j • .....
l .
..... .... ,_
~-
~£!!£;,
OF TJIE INT!:NTION TO CREATE A SPECIAL H:PROVE-
MDIT DISTRICT IN ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, TO BE
KNO~~ AS PAVING DlSTRICT NO . 2S, FOR THE PUR-
POSE OF COllSTRUCTlNG AND INSTALLI NG STREET
P,WING, CURB AND GUTTER l,ND SIDEWALK IMPROVE-.
MENTS, TOCE HER WITH NECESSARY INCIDENTALS,
.,···
. ~ ...
·! :·
·,
·'.
. '
.,,t
ON CERTAIN STRE!:TS AND AVENUES THEREIN, AND
OP' A PUBLIC HEARING THEREOH,.
. ~ .-'... . ... . . '-':··· ~·~?\:.
• .... J. ..
All own r s o f real estate and property t.ereinafter ~,;
descr ibed, and all persons generally, are hereby n ot ified that
th e City Council o f Englewoo d, Colorado, pursuant to its
own order has adopted preliminary details, plans a nd specifi-
cations !or construction of street paving , curb and gu tter
and sidewalk improvements, in and for a propos ed speci al Jm-
prov ement district within the corporate limits of Englewood,
Colorado, to be known as Paving District No . 25. Said
persons are fur er noti fied as follows:
(a) The iraprovementa to be constructed or
:'-1n.at.alle4 are aa !ollowa, · ... · · ", ..
• ~4-I.,
.. ,...-:
~· .. ~ .
'I r : \' -. . -...... "!,
i. · Necessary grading and excavation , 'paving with 6"' cOmpl!cted ......... ---.:
gravel base course and 2 " asphaltic concr ete s ur face, con-
c re te wal\cs, c .rb and gutter where not already !.nstalled1
together with appurtenances and incidentals on th e follow-
ing streets and avenues:
ON FROM TO
East Centennial Ave. East side of South 486 feet east of the
Broadway E. side of s. Bd lo'}".
South Delaware St. South side of West North side of Wes t
Eastnan Ave. Floyd Ave.
South Fox St. South side of Wes t North side of wes t
Cornell Ave . D rt.r.outh Ave.
South G~lapago St. North ~ j de or West 275 feet north of N.
Oxford Ave . side of w. Oxford Ave.
~outh >luron St. North s1de of H'ct;t ,oo feet N. of ncrth
Princeton Ave. side of w. Princeton Ave.
East Layton Ave. East side of South West r,:1de of £outh
Lincoln St . Shc:man S
East Layton Ave. East 6ide of South West side of South
Logan St. Pennsylvania St.
West Oxford Ave. We,s side of South We~t side of South
inca s Fox St.
West Princeton Ave. west ide or Sou h F:as side of South
Jlannock St • Ch e rol<ee St.
East Princeton Ave. fast sid<' of South West side' of South
Lincoln St. Logan St.
F'.as Union Ave. l'='ast side of South w st side of South
Broadway Pennsylvania St.
West Wesley Ave. WPst aide of South East side of South
1Pjon St. Zuni St.
-4-
•
I • •
n
•
\.._J
('
'. : .
.J
•
• •
.. ,-·,··t. .• • ;-... \ ':'
•' ..... ..,, , .. ~ .. -........ _ ... _ t.;__ -"-"• -
2,
ON
Necessary grading and excava tion , paving with 8" co!"'lr,,ctPd
gravel base course and 3 " a~phaltic con crete surface ~r~rox i -
mate ly 44 feet i n width, concrete wa lk s, curb and gutter
where not alre ady i ns alledr together with appurtenances
and incidentals on the following streets and avenue s,
TO
Wes t Sates Ava. Eas t side of South
Delaware St.
East side of Sou th
Galapago St.
Wes t Corn ell Ave. East side of S o uth
Shoshone St.
f.ast side of Sou th
Tc,jon S t.
3. Ne c e ssary gradi ng and excavat ion, paving with a~ compacted
gravel ba se course an d 3" asphaltic concrete surf ace approxi-
ma tely 34 feet in width, 4 -foot-wide concre c "V ~ pans ,
together w ith appurtenances and incidentals on the following
streets and avenue s :
!?!!
South Shoshon e St. Sou th side of West
Bates Ave .
North side o f West
Cor ne ll Ave.
So uth Uma t illa S t. South s id e of We st
Bates Ave.
:,orth side of West
Oar outh AvPnue
South Vallejo St . South side of West
Bates Ave.
North side of West
Oart:nouth Ave.
S outh Wyandot St , South side of West
Bates Ave.
North side of West
Dartmou th Ave.
4 . Necessary preparation of present surface, inst allation o f poly-
ptopylene fabric, overlaying of same with one-inch asphaltic
concrete. and concrete walks, curbs , and gutters, where not
presently adequate ; together with appurtenances and other i nci -
dental wo rk on he followinq strC'ets anc!. ~ve_nues ;_ __ _
FROM TO
East Amherst Place East side of South
Pennsylvania St.
West side of South
Clarkson St. '
East Dartmouth Circle
South Elati S t.
South Pearl St .
South Washington S t.
~orth side of 2100
East Dartmouth Ave.
South side of West
Oxford Ave .
South side of East
f.ten!ord Ave.
South si de p East
Grand Ave.
Nor h side of 2200
East Oart.mou h Ave .
Nor h Ei de of West
Princeton Ave .
North side of Cas t
'Tu! s Av e.
North side of Fast
SC'lleview 1,ve.
South Washington Circle West side of South WeEt side of South
Alley
South
Aley
S o uth
Alley
South
l<ashington St . (Aprroxi-Wa s hington St. (Approxi-
mately ,~1 0 south) mately 5050 south)
s. Necessary grading and excavation, compacted subgrade, and wi h
6" Portland cemen t concr~te surface, !or a total overall width
of fo u rte n fe e ; togc>•hpr w i th a1,pu r C'nancc s and o her inci-
den al work on the fol lowing alleys:
i::,~ fRQ_"I TO
E. of 3700 Blk, South idA of East North side of East
Broadway Kenyon Ave. Lehigh Ave.
o f 4000 Blk. South aide of East Nor h side of East
Broad ... •ay ;as&au Ave. Ox ford A\'e,
E. of 4 700 Blk. S o uth F:ide of East North side of Ea.&t
Broadway Union Ave. Lay o n /1.ve.
-5-
, ..
• •
I • •
..
<'
•
.I
•
• •
_.. -" ... ~:
(b) The description of the propo • cd district, bnd t he prop:·.-~ ·· :~.
erty to be asses s ed with the cost of tho i~provcmenle shall be all of '
the real prope rty fronting o r abutting on the streets and alley s between
the termini hereinbefore d escribed , including the real property with in
one-half (l/2) block of such streets and al leys . Ad ju s tments for t he ·, ;<
assessment of costs will be made fo r irregular a n d odd-sh~ped l ots and ·,,.·
p ar cels of property. -
(c) The probabl e tota l cost of the improvement s to be con-
structed and install~d is $1,050 ,100.
(d) The probable amount of he to t al cos t wh ich t he City !
shall pay is approximately $203,400 .
(e) The balance of the total cost which i s not paid by t he
City of Englewood will b e assess e d agaipst the proper ty specia lly bene -
fited by the improvements , and included within th e District . P robab le
costs pe r front foot for said improvemcntsare as follo~s:
I
i Asphalt paving on streets 36' wide (6 and 2)
Asphalt paving on stree t s 44 ' wide (9 an d 3)
Aspha lt paving on streets 3 4' wide (8 and 3)
1• As p halt overlay paving on streets 36' wide
Concrete alley pavi ng 1 4 '. wide
$15.86 per front foot
$27.33 per fro n t foot
S 20 .53 per fr ont foot
S 6 .60 per f ront foot
$17.82 pe r front foot
··1
Paving of other widths shall be in proportion to the above e s tima te.
4" thick c u rbwalk -Type I
4 " thick curbwa lk -Type II
Vertical cu rb a nd gutter
Si dewa l k 4' wi de
6" thick concrete slab
4 ' wide concre t e ~v~ Pan
Sll.93 pe r front foot
$12,15 per front foot
S 7,B8 per f ront f oot
S 8.40 per front foot
S 2 .7 8 p er square foot
$12.60 per front foot
Al l estimates exclude the s i x percent (6 1) for inspec~ion, col-
lection , inciden tal• and .interest as provided by law. '
The co s ts of paving to be constructed along the sides of corner
lots wi thin said District sh a ll b e assrssed a gainst properties within
one-ha lf (1/2) block, or 300' of such intersections and corn er l ots,
~hicheve r is sma ller , o n a z one basis ~n oc rordance w ith b e nefits con-
ferred on such proper ties.
Each one-half (l/2) block, or 300' eect:on, will be dJvide d
into six (6 ) parallel zones a nd asses!.:'lents ,.ill be on the !allowing
bas ia:
•
I
I • •
n
•
... .: "", , ~.. .. . -: ................ _..,,.
··;. ..
::{,(""··:
'.' 't'
• •)
........
. .. ... -·. -.: ·.
•
• -
I -,. • f .. ·; ... ;,.... .... -·-:. _
1st Zon e abutting on stree t
or ave nue •••.•..••••..•.•••.•••• 28 . 55 1
Next Zone •••••••••••••••.••••••••• 14.29 1
Next Zon e •••••••••••••.••••••••••• 14.291
Nex t Zon e •••.••• , •.••.••••••.•• ; · •... 14. 29 I
Next Zone •••• · • .' •• , ••••• .' .••••• · •••• 14. 29 I
..
• ·~ . . ,
· ... (·,-·.: ...... ,,';i ; ... ;
.. • ....... ' ~ •• "'I
.: .. ;· ~
Nex t Zon e;; •••••.•••••••• ·• '. • : ••.•• 14. 2 9 I
TOTAL •••• 1 0 01
~ ,,
: . ~ -.. ,•;
No ·e sses smc nts will be mad e for cu r bs, g ut t.ers lli nd -~.,···.
s i dewalk• i n place which c on f orm wi th t he plan s a n d &peci (i c a tion•
'
for the p ropos ed ill1 p rovem ents a n d wh i ch are acce ptab le to the .
City Engineer .
The cost o! improving street, avenue and alley inter-
ae ctiona t!'~~ug~~u~ ~h e D!•trict, a.nd ~f_pav~ng i~. e xce!~ o!_3!: ..
wi dths and a• thickness on streets desig n ated as ar eria l or co l l~c tor
,, ;. with i n residential zon ing as of January ), 1978, wil l b e paid by lhe
. City o f Englewood . -.. ~,
. ·.-:"---Prope rty owner s are i;pecifically referred to the •chedul e ... , -
o! proposed assessments which will Ba on f ile in th e Office o ! th e
Director o! Public Works, from wh i ch th e a pproximate a mo un t t o be
a ssessed -against any -particular lot or .p arce l or p rop e rty. mAY be
detenn i n ed. ·
Cpon completion of s a i d improvements, o r as soon a, the
total cost thereof is definitely a sce rt ained, such cos t sh a ll be
apportioned to th e property in t he Dis trict. Notice of such ap-
portionmen t shal l be g i ven a n d a Heari ng will be held prior to th e
adoption o f an ordinance as sessin g s uch c o st, a ll as p r ovided b y
law. ·
(f) . Sai d as s e ssments wil l be due and payable without
de mand within thirty day s from and a f ter the f i n al publication of
an ordinance assessing the wh ole cos t of s aid i mprovements against
the real property in said Di s t rict : p ro~ide d, h o wever , that any
owner who sh all pay the full a ssessment w i thin s aid p eriod o f
thirty days shall be entitled t o an allowance o f fiv e perc e n t (5 ).
In the even t that any owner of real prop er ty s h a ll fail o pay
the whole of s uch assessment aga i ns t he prope r t y wi hin s aid
thirty ·days, then th~ whole cost of s a id irnpr o vc mcnt s o ~s s es sed
against the property shall be pay~bl e in ten eq ual a nnu al in-
stallments o! principal. The fir s t o f s uch i nsta l l ments of
principal sha ll be due and p a y ab l e at such time as ma y be d e te rmined
in a n d by the assessing ordin a nce , an d th e r e maind e r of said
installme nts the r eafter u t i l all are p a i d in fu ll: Th e rate
of i nterest t o be paid on u n pa id nn d d ef e rre d insta llme nts will
be e s t a bl ished by o rdinance to be a d op~e d by t he Ci t y Co u ncil
at a l a ter dat e.
(g) A He aring on the cre a ion of the Dis trict
wi ll be he l d by the Council on Mo n d ay, t he 30th day of January,
1978, at 7 :JO o'clock P.M., at th e C i ty Ha ll in En glewood. A
publi c hear i n g s hall be held P:i or to l he f ina l pa s sage of such
o r din an c e, at the regu la r ·m eeti ng at 7 :JO P .M. on Tuesday,
Febr ua ry 21, 1978 .
7 -
•
I • •
-
•
'
•
·--· .... . .... _ ..... ...,_ ..... ' . . ~ ·-., ..
·-"···
•
• •
'~ ~ . · ..... ~~ ... ,, .
,. ·~ . ·. ,(
•' I ' ., /' :, .,-,_
(h) Any person desiring to be heard upo~ · the ':·.' · :• .
i s sue o f t h e creation o f the dlslrict or upon th e con&truc tlon~ ;·.~~:, ~
installation or improveme nt of the i mprovement!:. in vo lved, 1na.y, ,v·. ·· : -. .... -.:-~:;...
appear at th e time a nd place set f or the public hearing thcr.,on . ,_,,· '·,. ·i
for th at purpos e. · :-· . _'.J-<·
(i) A tuap, estimate and schedul e ghowing th• ·· · ~.·.::i:'·,,-,
approximate · Amount to b e as~essed,, and all resolutions and · ;_ ·: ... ~ .. :·, t: -·~, .. ·
proc eedings wi ll be on fil e and can be seen an d examined b y . /~~!:_. :". '
any person interested at the Office o f the Director of Publ ic -'· · .. .., .. ,, .,
Works at any time· during busines& hours on or pri or to the f., da t e of hea ring. ·
Dated th e Jrd_ day of January , 19 71!'.
SE A I.
Publish in, Engl ew ood .Hera ld-Sentinel
Publish o n, Januaryl_l, 19 and 25, 191~.
. . .. . -· ~ ..;
-8 -
Director of FinAnc e
Eng lewood, Colorado
•
' ..
•:'·.
'·'.•
,..'
'
•.,•.,,
·~
I • •
• -
• •
' """'Q I '• ...,.•
••1 ..-_,, __ • ~
,
• ~ .. r :,./'., 8. J\ copy of the notice wh ich will be p ub ll s ~ed .:·~-'•.-~-
shell also be me ilc d t o e ach p r op e rty owner to be inc luded . . . ··.,;
: .... : · within, the district and who will be as se~sed ~1th _ the cost: or ·r>·:,• .. ,;: ;; ..
the improvenienta. · · • · : : ·,:· , .:. i-.~ -, ·:
9. Sho uld any one Or more seC"t i on e or provisio~a of r1;·
this Re ,olution b e judicially dete r mined i n val i d o r u nen f o r cc4'h le ~·;,. ·-.-~ . . ~.. ... .;., such dote rmination s hall not affec.t, impair or invalida t e , the _ ·..__. :;.:(·
I • ~ • ~. -... ·, remaining provi s i on s hereat, the intenti o n be ing that the
v~rious provisions he r eof a r ~· severable. ·r ... "
.;. .. •; ADOPTED ANO APPROVED This . 3n'l day of J anuary, 1971 °,
-~· .. · :~;J/;;z: ,4' 2,~
· . Mayor /~~ .. ' :· ·:
ATTEST z . . . · • ,,·•: .:. / ... _-:.:.~ · ',_~·:,;. ? ; :··-~-_: ~~~-: ::;--: . . ' ",•' :···.· .. ' . /''.;-:
... V~L---..: ... :~.... ·;· .. ; I ;)_ :-~. • ·.:.o r8ct~nce .. ,. ; .. ,
·\st . ·,.. , .. : .. .; ·.·~·
( S !! A L)
' I ~ ..........
.. ; :
,..~ ,'
. '. • .. -? •
•
• I ~ • • , :::
r: ,• . :< ,
··"' ..
• •
(
(
MEMORANDUM ----------
TO:
FROM :
City Mana g er Mc Cowf~
Richards . Wa nush /cDir e ctor
DATE : January 24, 1978
•
• -
J..
o f Communit y Dev e lopmen t
SUBJECT : I-470 Transfe r Funds
In early January, the City of Englewood received the attached
memo from Rob e rt D. Farley, Executive Director of D.R.c.o.G.,
stating that applications were being accepted for the utiliza-
tion of approximately $61,200,000 in Federal Funds that were
made available as a result of the I-470 trans f er of funds
process. This proce ss is turning out just as we had feared
it is a grab ba g for all the communities in 1h e metro area,
not for only those in the southwest quadrant.
You will recall that Eng lewood took the lead more than a
year ago in the sou t hw e s t by at tempting t o coordinate the
loca l governments in a j oint e ffort a t planning the use of
these funds. This e f f ort never g ot off the ground, and we
now have to subm it r equests for t h e s e f unds a long wi t h every-
one else in the me tro area . The a t t ache d memo generally
spells out what should be conta i ned i n ou r su b mission . In
addition, we have l e arned that those proj ec ts already in the
Regional Transport a tion Pl a n a nd i n th e Trans p o rtation Improve-
ment Program h a ve a greater c hance o f appro va l than other pro-
jec t s. Improve me n ts that ha v e a reg i ona l s ignificance will
rat e higher th a n tho s e with only l oca l im pact . It s hould also
be e mphas ized, that the City mu s t c e r t ify its inten t t o ma tch
t hose pro jects that it submits .
Since we are talking about proj ects that mo st probab ly not
be st a rted until 1980 or after, we would be committing Pu bl ic
Im prove ment Funds f rom t ha t da te. We certa i nly c o u ld r e quest
l a ter starting years i f we chose . The second attachment,
Draf t Projec t Sele ction Criteria, goes in to mo re detai l o n
t h e prb p o se d crite ria f or j udging pro jects .
E n glewood p ro jects that ought to be cons idered a r e:
1 . U .S. 285 o ne-way coupl et
Co s t -$9,57 7,000
Mat ch -St a te -$1 ,9 1 5 ,4 00
•
I • •
n
-
(
•
•
City Manager Mccown
January 24, 1978
Page -2-
•
• •
2. Broadway (Yale to Floyd, and Quincy to Belleview)
Cost -$1,096,000
Match -City -$284,960
3. Kenyon, Navajo, Union
Cost -$2,157,000
Match -City -$560,820
4. Quincy (Santa Fe to Federal)
Cost -$1,901,000
Match -Sheridan -$494,260
Comments: We should contact Sheridan to express our
support for this project if they choose to submit it.
It would help us by reducing traffic on Belleview and
U.S. 285.
5. Clarkson (U.S. 285 to Orchard)
Cost -$2,255,000
Match -$586,300 (Englewood, Cherry Hills Village,
Greenwood Village.)
Comments: Requires local cooperation.
6. Floyd Avenue (Galapago to Zuni)
Cost -$5,700,000
Match -$1,482,000 (Englewood and Sheridan)
Comments : This project would reduce downtown congestion.
It is not totally within the City of Englewood and would
require the cooperation of Sheridan.
7. Zuni (Dartmouth to U.S. 285)
Cost -$486,000
Match -$126,360 (Englewood and Sheridan)
Comments : Re q uires coopera t ion of Sheridan.
8 . Logan (Dartmouth to Yale )
Cost -$397,000
9.
Match -City -$103,220
Bannock (U .S. 285 to Nassau)
Cost -$443,000
Match -City -$115,100
•
I • •
-
-
f
•
•
(
•
City Manager McCown
January 24, 1978
Page -3-
10, Yale (Elati to Downing
Cost -$772,000
Match -City -$200,720
.J
•
• •
U.S. 285 certainly has regional significance, and the match
must come from the State. The only Englewood projects of
some regional significance are Kenyon, Navajo and Union, and
Broadway, which would require a total match of $845,780,
Other solely Englewood projects total a commitment of $419,120.
The remainder of the projects require coordination with other
municipalities.
Because of the grab bag nature of the requests for this funding,
I recommend that Englewood explore getting the southwest com-
munities together on~e again to pool our resources to support
a mutually agreeable plan for the use of these funds, and for
a mutually agreeabl e strategy within the approval agency --
D,R,C,O,G,
gw
•
I • •
.I
•
• •
,· I
Denver Regional
Council of
Governments
1770 Sout!"l Jackson $treet
Oenvf,r. \c,10,ad o f\0:?10
303 '158 -5 166
----------------------------
f ~ f: C f I \! t: 1r-,
. . ' ,._ . .,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
' i:J7D
DRCOG Representatlves Within the Urbani;z~;AJe9 ,-.,.~ -: ..
Mayors of all Cities and Towns within the Urbp,plz~1-J~~ea ·
City Managers and/or Publlc Works Directors of a·u · Clttes and
Towns wlthln the Urbanized Area
Colorado Department of Highways
Regional Transportation District
Robert D. Farley, Executl ve Director
1-470 TRANSFER FUND PROJECT APPLICATIONS
January 3, 1978
DRCOG IS SOLICITING APPLICATI O NS FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS TO BE
PARTIALLY FUNDED BY l-470 "TRANSFER FUNDS." APPLI C ATIONS MUST BE
RETURNEfl TO DRCOG BY FEBR UARY 6, 1978.
Background--
In September, 1977, In accord with 23 USC 103 (e) (4), Interstate 470 was
officially withdrawn from the Interstate System by the Department of
Transportation. Under the provisions of this legislation, the Federal funds
originally programmed for l-470, $158,287,000, were made available for use
In the Denver Metropolitan Area as the Federal share for other transportati o n
proje c ts. The funds are availabl e until spent and are regularly adjusted to
account for c o st changes In r el ati o n to changes in the national constructlon
c ost Index.
Three projects were lnltlally sel e cte d for the use of a portion of the money
in th e withd rawal-substituti o n r e qu est. Thes e p rojects are: (1) A Parkway
i n the Sou t hwest area of D e n ve r, (2) Improve ments to the South Santa Fe
corridor including actions t o r educe rail-highway conflicts, and (3) Kipling
Street fro m Je well south t o th e Park way. The t o ta 1 cost of these three pro j e cts
has been e stimated at $121,3 00,0 0 0 o f wh ich the F e deral share Is e stimated
at $96,400,000, As a result, app rox imate ly $61,2 00,000 in Federal fund s
still remains available as the Federal share for other transportation projects.
fae 1..ulh1• C o mmnt ..
--•• ~-.. , . ..,., ... ,c.,r I • ' P,I ,•ti ' '• ' ~·• ·,-"!,. ·. 'J'"' • -... :rin .... ~-
,', J ... ·,,•,:,· •• ,,).'t,1
'-'("'' '.J'. • . ,t,,:..,t ,O ; ,, ... .,.
•
, ... '····. •C"t ,,'J"'rt . ''•\:
"•' I.,.,..,,
•
0"'1Pl t' .J'•
/,'••[,,J -lt ~1 .. r_Jr
I • •
·.
(
•
J
•
• -
The "transfer" funds are made available upon application by the Governor at
the request of DRCOG as the "responsible group of local officials" Indi c ated
ln the transfer leglslatlon. Because each project for which the funds are
requested must be specifically Indicated ln the Federal budget after review
by the Department of Transportation, requests for funds must be forwarded to
the Department of Transportation In March preceding the Federal fiscal year.
Project Applications Solicited
The DRCOG Council at Its December 21, 1977, meeting decided to make
application for a portion of the transfer funds by March 31, 1978,
and ls therefore currently soliciting project applications from
every eligible local unit of government, the Regional Transportation
District and the Colorado Department of Highways. In order that all projects
can be commonly evaluated, an application (described below) must be completed
for each solicited project and returned to DRCOG. by February 6, 1978. An appli-
cation must be received by DRCOG for each pro!ect even though an applicant
has previously requested project consideration for use of these funds.
Project Application
The following must be submitted for each project:
I. A resolution of the City Councll or governing body certifying
their support of the project and their Intention and ability to
match the Federal funds If the project is selected.
2. A declaration of the current status of the project , (e.g.
authorization, draft environmental Impact statement, location
hearing, compl e ti o n o f waiting period following release of the
final Environmental Impa c t Statement or negative declaratlon,
preliminary design, c o nstru c tion drawings, etc.).
3. Project Applicati o n Form (Note: the forms contain requests
for basic information relative to the project. Specific project
evaluation crite r ia have n o t as yet been selected. As such,
a ddl tlonal data may be requested at a later date.)
4. Statement descr ibing th e anticipated effect of the project on
alrquallty.
S. S tatement Indicating th e degree t o which t he project serves
the trave l needs o f min o rity, elderl y, and handicapped
persons.
6. Sta tem e nt describing the degn~e t o which the project encourages
higher vehicle occupancies .
-2-
•
I • •
-
•
•
./
•
• •
Project Selection Criteria
The DRCOG staff ls currently In the process o f preparing specific criteria t o
aid the Council In Its selection of projects, It Is anticipated that thes e criteria
will be available for Council action at the January 18, 1978, meeting. Subse-
quent to this action, each member government and participating agency will be
Informed of the selection criteria.
Meeting
A special Transportation Advisory Committee meeting ls scheduled for Tuesday,
January 10, 1978, at 1:30 P. M. In the DRCOG Conference Room to discuss the
utilization of Interstate Transfer Funds and the application data requested.
Interested parties are Invited to attend.
Please direct any questions you might have to Mr·. Robert Relsh of the DRCOG
Transportation Staff,
gJs/ra_z
Enclosure
-3-
•
I • •
I n ,..,
./
•
• -
INTERSTATE TRANSFER FUNDS
HIGHWAY APPLI C,\TION FORM DESCR IPTI O N
Line 2. Project Name.
The project should be named by the facility on which the main improvements
are to be made. The limits of the project should be described by the nearest
intersecting street and the overall mileage given.
Line 3. Description of the Present Facility.
The project should be adequately described includ ing factors which adversely
affect trafflc operatlon ,
Line 4. Volume to Capacity Ratio .
ADT c an be furnished through the latest volumes counts from the Colorado
Division of Highways. Communities may <.;onsult with the DRCOG staff
prior to application submission to obtain such volume counts. If a com-
munit y h as reason to be lieve that such volume counts are less than actu al
t hen they may have such counts done by other sources. If that ls done, then
th e source of these counts must be cited. Such counts must b e done prior to
project application.
Capacities will be calculated by DRCOG staff using standardized figures.
Line S. Hazard Index (H. I,) -Leave Blank
The effective Hazard Index will be furnished by the DRCOG staff. Where
there are several sec tions of H. I. for the highway improvement, a n average
H. I. will be calcu lated.
Line 6. Previous Funding and Statu s
Describe in the appropriate s p aces when and how much money h as been spent
on preliminary eng ineering and on ROW or construction In the past , and the
source of these funds. In addition describe the present status of the pro ject,
1. e. , has the EIS been approved, has ROW been purc h ased, etc.
Line 7 . Descri ption of Improvements.
Describe the proposed improvements. Graphic materials may be attached .
Line 8 . Effect i veness of So lution (Major Projects O nly).
•
Discuss how the improve·men t s will affect traffic operations, relating factors
outlined in Line 4 which will be improved for the present thro ugh the year 2000 .
•
I • •
-
-
'I •
0
•
•
.I
•
• •
Line 9, Addltlona l Criteria.
If there are additional considerable reasons for these Improvements, a discus-
sion should be presented,
Line l O. Cost Estimate,
Cost estimate may be broken down Into ROW & Construction costs.
Li ne 11. Signature.
The responsible party shall sign the application.
12/29/77
-2-
I • •
r,
-
•
\
•
• •
Denver R~gional
Councilor
Governments
1771, ',1)11lh .1,11 ~·., 'lfl •.11, ••• ,
f'L•II \'''' l ""p1, 1r 1" I , h i, •• ,, 1
303 !756 5166
-------------------------------
MEMORANDUM
TO: Program Committee, DRCOG
FROM: George J, Scheuemstuhl, Director of Transportation Planning~
DATE: January 4, 1978
SUBJECT: FIRST DRAFT
1-470 SUBSTITUTION PROJECT SELECTION
strategy and project selection criteria relative to the selection of 1-470
substitution projects. These recommendations were presented at a special
meeting of the Transportation Committee on January 4, 1978. As a quorum
of this committee was not present no formal action was taken. Individual
comments are summarized and attached. They should not necessarily be
construed to represent the views of the Transportation Committee.
Another meeting of the Transportation Committee has been scheduled for
January 12, 1978, 10:00 a.m. at DRCOG to recommend a funding strategy
and set of criteria to the DRCOG Council, Your comments on the recom-
mendations attached to this memorandum are requested by Friday, January
6 for incorporation Into a second draft of the recommendations for mailing
to the Transportation Committee on that date,
GJS/dm
Attachment
l••cull•• Committee
I •t O U OI I I , t,r•t ... l ;.,,.. , ...... ,,, ... eto,,y~
C'tt01 1t" A .. ,ft\ Vrrw Chal1man
Jrl.n C. Cn,rc lb...a
[)('In L ll,,! .... ~ • .,
W ,llioJT, ft f.~,. C.l .:A JI
J,,)f'fv1t J Pll,J'"W'I
'A',llo()l 11h, ... ,,..,.,
• • •. •, I • o,\ •, Jollh ,W,
:, , '• ... '•· ,., ,,,,,r~ , .... , .......
. .... ,1,., ..... , .... ,,,_ ... __ .. _________ ..,.. ___ ~---------...... • •
I • •
(
•
•
•
• -
DRCOG STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
FIRST DnAl'T
1/4/78
1-470 SUBSTITUTION PROJECT S.ELECTION
RECOMMENDED FUNDING STRATEGY AND PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA
SUMMARY
$157. 6 million available as Federal Share.
Previously selected projects total $96. 4 mlllfon.
CDH firm fund request needed to establish amount available for
additional projects.
FY 79 project fund requests must be inserted in Federal budget by
Congressional delegation. FY 80 project fund requests must be
submitted to DOT by March 31, 1978. (Extension ls needed if fair
and equitable project selection ls to be accomplished)
Contingency fund of $20 million ls recommended.
A ten year program for utllfzatfon of these funds ls recommended.
FY 79 Strategy
Commit only $4 million (10% of approximate amount available
after contingencies).
Select projects from TIP
•
I • •
In r,
-
0
•
\ .
•
• •
Select projects ready for construction.
Use Project Evaluation Criteria to evaluate and select projects.
FY 80-88 Strategy
Commit all projects.
Budget 10% for FY BO.
Use Project Evaluation Criteria to select projects.
Project Evaluation Criteria (See page
Public Support.
Local Share Commitment.
Region serving utility.
I • •
-
•
•
• •
RECOMMENDCD FUNDING STRATEGY AND PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA
By withdrawing 1-470 from the Interstate System the $158,287,000 of
Feder~l funds originally programmed for I-70 were made available for use
in the Denver MetropoI1tan Area as the Federal share for other transportation
projects. The funds are available until spent and are regularly adjusted
to account for cost changes in relation to changes in the national construc-
tion cost index.
Three projects were initially selected for the use of a portion of the
•. -· ......... , ••• ···--... -··· .... -.. ----...... ·--·· ...... ' \-J ........... .
Santa Fe quarter including actions to reduce rail-highway conflicts and
(3) Kipling Street from Jewell south to the Parkway., The total cost of
these three projects has been estimated at $121,300,000 of which the
Federal share ls estimated at $96,400,000. As a result, approximately
$61,200,000 in Federal funds stlll remains available as the Federal share
for additional transportation projects.
All projects selected for the use of this money must be included
in the Federal budget. As such, the selection of projects must
r e cognize the Fed ~ral budgetary process. Following this process, Items
' for Inclusion in the Federal budget for the Federal fiscal year beginning
October 1 are normally submitted to the Federal Department of Transportation
by March 31 of the preceding year for review. After review by the Depart-
ment of Transportation the projects are submitted for incorporation into the
Federal budget on January 1. Between January 1 and April 1 the Federal
•
I • •
(
•
(
•
•
• •
budget ls considere d by Congress with a p pro va l u s u a lly In June or July.
Upon approval of the budget funds are approp riat ed beg inning Oc tober l
of that year. Thus, under normal such circu mstance s a pproximately 18
months are required for an Hem to be incl uded l n t he Federal budget and
funds appropriated. This process can, give n u nu s u a l circumstances, be
shortened somewhat by the cong re s siona l dele gatio n directly inserting
items into the Fede ral b ud get duri ng th e budgetary revie w process ln
February and March.
1980. In view of this decision, it wlll be neces sary for the congressional
delegat lon to directly ask for budgetary considera tion o f any fiscal J 979
projects and given adherence to the De p artment of Trans portation time
schedule it wlll be necessary to s e l e ct pr oj e cts by M arch 3], 1978 for
inclusion in the fiscal 19 80 budget. Se l e c tion of all pr ojects by March 31 ,
1978 gives lit tle time for sufficient r e v i e w a n~ d oes not appear to be desir-
able. It i s rec omm ended that proj e c t s elec tion be d e fe rred until June, 1978.*
Given th ese circumstanc e s, t he followin g stra teg y ls re c ommended for t he
selection o f add itional projec ts .
Ideally the s e l e ction of projects for use o f t h e I -4 70 transfer funds
should be conducted such that all local u n its o f government and agencies
*This stlll allows time for DOT review prior to Ja n uary 1, 1979 when
Congress will consider the budget.
•
I • •
In ,.. n
(
•
....
•
• -
have ample time to subm it proj ects for c o nsideration and b a sed on a speci-
fic set of criteria and measures to ena b le o b j ec t i ve considerati o n of each
of the projects submitted relatl ve to others in com petition for the fund s .
In actuality, the development of such a process is c o n strained by time
ava ilability. Time does not permit a proj ect solic itation period for fis c al
1979. Even the time availability for fis c al 19 80 Is somewhat constrained.
As such, it becomes necessary to utll!ze tw o d i fferent a pproaches to the
se lection and evaluation of fiscal year 19 79 a nd fi s cal year 1980 project s.
_ ~ ....... ··-.1-..... , ___ "' -i·..-·---·····-r -·-'-••'-••
Improvement Prog ra m. The recomme nded approac h for fiscal yeat 19 80 is
the solicitation of projects from l ocal u nit s o f government and agencies.
Both proj ec ts for fiscal year 1979 and fi fca l y ear 19 80 would be evaluated
ba sed upon specific project eval uation criteri a .
Basic to the selection of any projects either for fisca l year 1979 or
fisca l year 1980 is the dete rmination of the total amount of money to be
a va!labl e for utilization by projects other than the three proj ects selected
as part of the initial interstate substitution request. In the interstate
withdrawal-substitution proposal submitted to the Secretary o f Transporta-
tion ln July of 1977, a Federal share o f $1 57,600,000 was I ndicated as
being available to the region. Of this s u m , $96 ,400 ,000 was allocated
to the three initially selected proJects . Ap prox i mate l y $61 , 2 00,000 was
indicated as being ava~lable for "add itional projects ". In order to commit
•
i i
I
f
r r
I
~
I
l
l·
f
t
I • •
n
-
(
(
•
•
• •
funds to additional projects the exact Fe d e ral share remaini ng mus t b e
confirmed. It is therefore, extre mely Impo rtant that the Colorado D epa rt -
ment ?f Highways firmly establish their fund reque st for these projects
within the next month. This fund request should describe each proJect In
terms of major elements and provide firm cost estimates.
Contingencies
Recognizing that most project cost estimates are based upon prelimi-
nary engineering rather than detailed construction drawings, the need for
cies. Any project could draw upon the contingency funds up to 15% of the
Initial project estimate. Funds from this account would only be distri-
buted based upon documentation of the need for such funding. As sumlng
the setting aside of $20 million for contingencies leaves approximately
$41.2 million of Federal share money available for additional projects
within the FAU boundary area.
Budget
The selection of projects for use of the available transfer of funds
In volves both the commitment of the f u nds to spec ific projects and the
development of an annual budget for the use of these funds. Given that
the approximate time required to construct a highway project from Inception
to construction completion is approximately seven years, and given the
above discussed budgetary restrictions, a ten year program seems appro-
priate. To encouragE: project progress it Is recommended that funds
•
I • •
n
•
(
•
•
• •
initially be only budgeted for the ·fiscal yea rs 1979 and 1980 and that
from that period hence an annual budget be developed after revi ew ing
the status of each of the projects selected,
Prefect Selection -Fiscal Year 1979
1) It is recommended that projects accounting for $4 million In
Federal funds be selected for fiscal year 1979. This recommendation ls
based upon the above assume d ten year program and the even distribution
of the available $41 million over that ten year period.
in the Transportation Improvement Program represent Identified needs of
each of the agencies and the various units of government, were selected
on the basi s of an accepte d evaluation process and appropriate time was
available for project Identification.
3) It is recommended that only projects currently ready for construc-
tion or having completed step 13 of the Action Plan should be selected for
fiscal l 979 funds. Given the fact that the transfer funds will continue to
be available and not lost, there would appear to be less urgency in the
selection of projects which mu st still go through the planning, preliminary
design, environmental i mpact statement and other planning processes.
4) It is recommended that individual projects be selected on the ba sis
of the project selection criteria described In this report. A time schedule
for completion of this process Is shown In Table 1. I • •
-
•
(
Date
01/03/78
01/04/78
01/10/78
(
01/18/78
02/06/78 .
02/07/78
02/14/78
02/21/78
02/22/78
03/01/7 8
0 3/08/78
03/15/78
•
• •
T/\BLE l
FISCAL 1979
INTERSTATE TRANSFER PROJECT SELECTION CALENDAR
Actor
DRCOG Staff
Program Committee
TransPortation Advisory
Committee
Activity
Distributes memo soliciting projects.
Staff recommendations on:
• Alternative objectives and evaluating
criteria
• F!n~ncial strategies
DHCOG presentation on:
Likely evaluation criteria and other
information
Program Committee/Council Adoption of evaluation criteria, first year
funding.
Local Governments and
Agencies
TransPortation Advisory
Committee*
Tra n s})Ortation
Committe e
Program Committee
Council of Eligible
Jurisdictions
Council
Final deadline for project application.
Checks project evaluations and priorities.
Recommends evaluations and prior ity list.
Recommends program to Council.
Special meeting on evaluations, p r iorities,
and program.
Confirms program and TIP amendment.
(
Members of the Citizens Advisory Committee would be invited to attend as observers.
• •
I • •
I n r,
-
•
Date Actor
r£. 16/78** Highway Commission
03/31/78 Governor
r,
•
• •
Activit
Forwards program and TIP am endme nt to
Governor.
Forwards program to Secretary of Tran sporta-
tion and Chairman of the House Com mittee
on Public Works,
** Highway Commission meetings are usually scheduled for the third Thursday of each
month, however, they sometimes are rescheduled.
(
(
• •
' ':
I • •
n
-
-
·c
0
•
(
•
•
• •
Project Se l ection -Fiscal Year 1980 and Se l ection of all Substitute Prol~cts
1) It is recommended that for the fiscal year 1900 the re maining 90%
of the available funds be committed to specific projects and that again
approximately 10% of that commitment be budgeted for 1980.
2) Projects s e l e cted for funding should be based upon the project
selection criteria described In this report.
A time schedule for completion of this process ls sh own In Table 2.
I • •
-
(
Date
01/13/78
01/04/78
01/10/78
( 01/18/78
02/15/78
02/16/78
t hrough
04/19/78
04/05/78
• 04/26/78
( IJS/17/78
•
.I
•
• •
TABLE 2
FISCAL YEAR 1980 THROUGH 88
INTERSTATE TRANSFER PROJECT SELECTION CALENDAR
Actor Activlt
DRCOG Staff Distributes memo soliciting projects.
Program Committee Staff presentation on:
• Alternative objectives and evaluating
crite ria
/!,lt crn ;:,t fvp r,,r ,..l;r,,.. r r ,....{l"'rt'-:·r.:.c:-
0
•••'"-"-••'"-'._•"''-.:>.t--..;"-'J..O.i. OU\/1::,Uty (.;Qffi1J1l ((€e
TransPortation Advisory Staff pres entation on trans'!er funds and Committee (special meeting) information.
Program Committee/Council Adopts a general type of evaluation criteria
and funding strategy.
Directs DRCOG staff to select specific
evaluation criteria and funding strategies
and rePort recommendations to Council at
February meeting.
Council Approves evaluation criteria and funding
strategy.
DRCOG Staff Evaluates projects and develops priorities.
Transportation Advisory Reviews project evaluations and priorities. Committee
TransPo r tation Committee Forwards program to Council and TIP amend-
ment.
Council Adopts program and forwards highway com-
mission.
I • •
In n
-
(
•
05/18/78
06/01/78
•
Actor
Highway Commission
Governor
•
• •
ActivH
Sends to Governor.
Sends program to Congress and S ecreta ry of
Transportation.
•
I • •
I D n
-
(
(
•
' J
•
• •
PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA
The availability of funds provided by 1-4 70 represents a unique opportunity
and responsibility on behalf of those persons charged with deciding the use of
these funds. The Judicious use of the funds could have a dramatic impact on
improving the region's transportation system . On the other hand, the chance
exists for the widespread distribution of funds such that little, If any, bene-
ficial impact can be perceived by the travelling public.
It is the DRCOG Transportation staff's recommendation that the 1-470 funds
. -··-----·-----.a-·-1'-· -·· -··-··•:, -· .. '-·-;,J --·-.._. _____ ·-··-. --• -·· --· --·-· --·-
emphasize construction, projects having widespread support, local share com-
mitment and region serving utility.
Criteria
I. Projects selected shall serve regional travel movements and further completion
of the long range transportation plan. Projects must:
(a) Have a minimum total cost of $I, 000, 000 including engineering.
(b) Either further the completion of the 2000 highway plan, or
(c) Consist of a transit project of regional s ignificance.
2. Projects must be within the FAU boundary and on the Federal Aid Sy stem .
3. Projects are to be evaluated and ranked as to selection on the basis of
specific quantitative performance criteria to be prepared by DRCOG staff.
4. Projects shall only be selected to which the local share of the cost has
been committed.
S. Projects shall only .be selected which can demonstr_ate widespread public
support.
•
I •
•
I )
•
• •
6. Projects should not adversely impact on reg·ional a1r quality.
7. Projects should improve the mobility of the elderly, the handicapped and
minorities.
•
I • •
-
•
, J
•
• •
(:,1 f_J L!t)UM i / /\.\e..e.f i°Y'lj
Q)a.nuO.Y):'. J O, 14 1 ~
ORD t(l[A«e!.e, # J, 4, 5
/fk~OL U.TIO I #=" /,~/,/f.'g, -/, /0,I / 1,?,
1
•
0
I . .
In
-
•
' J
•
• -
RESOLUTION NO. _6~~-• SERIES OF 1978
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO THE DENVER REGIONAL
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REQUESTING THAT WEST QUINCY AVENUE BE-
TWEEN SOUTH FEDERAL BOULEVARD AND SOUTH SANTA FE DRIVE BE CON-
STRUCTED AND THAT FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT BE APPROVED AS A
SUBSTITUTE PROJECT UNDER THE I-470 TRANSFER.
WHEREAS, I-470 has been officially withdrawn from
the Interstate System; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Funds originally programmed
for I-470, $158,287,000, were made available for use in the
Denver Metropolitan Area; and
WHEREAS, approximately $61,200,000 of these funds
remain available for transportation projects; and
WHEREAS, the Denver Regional Council of Governments
has requested that local governments within the Denver Metro-
politan Area submit projects for the use of these Transfer
Funds; and
WHEREAS, a major criteria for the approval of
individual projects is the project's regional significance;
and
WHEREAS, the construction of West Quincy Avenue
between South Federal Boulevard and South Santa Fe Drive is
of regional significance in that it will relieve some of the
east/west traffic that normally uses U.S. 285, and present
Santa Fe plans call for the construction of a major inter-
change at Quincy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Englewood, Colorado as follows:
That the City of Englewood supports the inclusion
of West Quincy Avenue between South Federal Boulevard and
South Santa Fe Drive in the Transportation Improvement Pro-
gram; and
That the City of Englewood supports the use of
I-470 transfer funds for the construction of Quincy Avenue
improvements.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS Joth day of
January, 1978, at a Special Meeting of the Englewood City
Council.
Mayor Pro tem
•
I • •
n
-
•
,J
•
• •
ATTEST:
~faiful~
I, Janice L. Watkins, Deputy City Clerk, of the
City of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above
and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of
Resolution No. 6 , Series of 1978.
Q:~ol?f/ad<tdl
t)fputy City Cler
I • •
In n
•
•
• •
RESOLUTION NO. ~~4~~~• SERIES OF 1978.
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION TO THE DENVER REGIONAL
COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS REQUESTING THAT U.S. 285 BETWEEN SOUTH
SANTA FE DRIVE AND SOUTH BROADWAY BE CONSTRUCTED AS A ONE-WAY
COUPLET, WITH THE PRESENT U.S. 285 AS THE WESTBOUND SEGMENT
AND WEST ITHACA AVENUE AS THE EASTBOUND SEGMENT, AND THAT
FUNDING FOR THIS PROJECT BE APPROVED AS A SUBSTITUTE PROJECT
UNDER THE I-470 TRANSFER.
WHEREAS, I-470 has been officially withdrawn from
the Interstate System; and
WHEREftS, the Federal Funds originally programmed
for I-470, $158,287,000, were made available for use in the
Denver Metropolitan Area; and
WHEREAS, approximately $61,200,000 of these funds
remain available for transportation projects; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor of the City of Englewood, with
the unanimous approval of the Englewood City Council, on
September 16, 1977, re~uested that the Denver Regional Council
of Governments place U. S. 285 improvements between South
Santa Fe Drive and South Broadway on the Regional Transporta-
tion Improvement Program and to fund construction with the
I-470 transfer funds; and
WHEREAS, after due consideration the Englewood City
Council reaffirms its position that the traffic conflicts on
U.S. 285 between South Santa Fe and South Broadway involving
through traffic and local traffic can best be solved by
utilizing the present U.S. 285 as the west bound section of a
one-way couplet and West Ithaca Avenue as the east bound
section; and
WHEREAS, U. s. 285 is the only east/west arterial of
regional significance south of U. S. 6; and
WHEREAS, the recommended improvement to u. S. 285
in this area will greatly facilitate east/west regional move-
ment and reduce traffic conflicts and accidents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Englewood, Colorado as follows:
That the Denver Regional Council of Governments
place the one-way couplet of U. s. 285 between South Santa Fe
Drive and South Broadway on the Regional Transportation Improve-
ment; and I • •
-
•
•
, ,.._
•
• •
That the Denver Regional Council of Governments
approve the use of I-470 transfer funds for the construction
of the improvements necessary to implement the proposed one-
way couplet on U, S. 285,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Englewood
will cooperate with any Federal, State, Regional or Local body
to facilitate the construction of the proposed improvements
and that, to this end, the City will commit whatever resources
are at its disposal,
ADOPI'ED AND APPROVED this 30 '6J.. day of
January, 1978, at a Special Meeting of the Englewood City
Council.
Mayor Pro tem
ATTEST:
ihff)L(~ ~Id~
~City Clerk
I, Janice L. Watkins, Deputy City Clerk, of the City
of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and
foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of Resolution
No. 4 , Series of 1978,
~aeul~ y City Clerk
•
I • •
-
•
\._.,. (
•
•
• •
AGENDA OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
JANUARY 30, 1978
7 : 30 P .M. Call to order , invoc;,+: i n :1, pledge of allegiance
and roll call .
1. Public Hearing to consider proposed Paving District 1125 . (Copies enclosed .)
2. Considerat i on of submission of traffic improvement
projects to Denver Regional Council of Governments
to be funded by I-470 transfer of funds . (Copies enclosed .)
3. Adjournment .
•
I • •
n . . n