Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-05-08 (Special) Meeting Agenda• • - • 0 CITY COUNCIL HEETING -SPECIAL May d, 1978 • - • • • • ROLL CALL Hoved Seconded 1 ·-Pyye ~: ... ,1 f 11 m-" . __ l ,..... I :>ma r: Harn~rr._ I Clayton I Mann ' Mayor Ta y_,Ed -Ji!L ~~~~ -c_c-uJ c?Y~J_;(;h ;J_ ~J ./ /JZt~J- cU ao fua_t .J-: lJJtJilV._~ L {j_j_~dt__' >L<J • Nav • , Absta fn Absent I . . • - • • ROLL CALL H ed S d d A N Ab taf ov econ e :'}'e ~ s n sen WilHam!' ·---...J::::._ _1ieber JL_ 2!!1._1_¥--~ Ab t J:lm!~-K Cl~ton ....L::.:::::: Mann _1 ~ ~or fa y~ _9 r .1 K • I . • • • , • • .. • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Wi1 1 ia"!.~- Aye Nav Abstain Absent -w .. h.... ·- :>m1tr. -Haro!:r._ Cliivton Mann I Jllayor TO:y_l_£J r 1 I . • • , • • • ROLL CALL Moved Seconded Ave Nav Absta 1n Absent W1111am ~ IJ<>h<>r sm1 r. Hare~ Clavton Mann L Mayor Ta y~ !'U J U'lL'I l q__ /I!U ,,~,. __ .. / / . ~ ) c f 17 --) ,/ 1 cr-f (A C---a /0 u Q.J J, c_~( ~~-/ I . . • • - 7:30 P.M. 1. • • • AGENDA FOR THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL MAY 8, 1978 r Call to order, invocation, pledge of allegiance and roll call. Public Hearing. (a) To consider the annexation of property located in the Santa Fe Drive/Union Avenue area of Arapahoe County to the City of Englewood. (Copies enclosed.) 2 Adjournment. ph I • • ( ( • ( • TO : FROM : DATE : SUBJECT: , • • • Members of Englewood City Council rC\ William D. James, Director of Finance r~~ March 2, 1978 Annexation Petitions The City Clerk's Office is in receipt of three petitions re- questing annexation of property contiguous to Englewood in the vicinity of Union Avenue and Santa Fe Drive. According to the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965, i t is re- quired that I inform City Council that these petitions are in custody of the City Clerk's Office. cc : Jimmy E. Curnes, Acting City Manager • I • • ( 1 Royce 2 Kittle 3 Verdes 4 Knoedler • , • • - SANTA FE ANN EXATI ON PETI TIO NS I I ' I I r----·- ! ' I ' ' ::::::---=--::::---- .................. : ..... , : ....... : ,, : ...... ' ' ' ' : ' ..... : ' L----......._· 5 Hunt 6 Santa Fe Florists 7 Tague 8 Yanish 9 Ragsdale 10 Cockerham 11 Forbes 12 Coffelt • • • • • • TO: FROM: City Managfl!c own 'I Richard s./ anush, Director of Community Development DATE: February 22, 1978 SUBJECT: Recommended Conditions to Santa Fe Annexation After reviewing the water and fire fighting requirements for the proposed Santa Fe annexation with the Director of Utilities and the Fire Chief, we recommend that the construction of a water main between the City's sixteen (16) inch line on Union Avenue and its fourteen (14) inch line on West Oxford Avenue be made a condition of annexation. We arrived at this recom- mendation after reviewing the existing service and concluding that the existing three {3) inch line is totally inadequate b service the area. The Fire Chief also reviewed his department's capability of fighting fire with the existing service and concluded that only the property frontage along West Union Avenue could be efficiently serviced. The remainder of the property and the rear of the properties along West Union Avenue could not be efficiently reached without the severe disruption of vehicular and rail traffic along South Santa Fe and without so tying up such a large portion of our fire fighting equipment that service to the remainder of Englewood would be seriously impaired, Options of providing service were examined, including the use of the existing Denver transmission lines along West Quincy or West Radcliff . The Director of Utilities contacted the Denver Water Board and concluded that they would not permit their service to extend within the City limits of Englewood, There was also some question as to whether the Denver Water Board would permit a dead-end hydrant to tap onto its large transmission lines. Both the Fire Chief and Director of Utilities agreed that the minimum fire flow to provide adequate fire protection in the type area such as this, is 5,000 gallons per minute. This fire flow can be delivered with a twelve (12) inch tie betwem Oxford and Union along Santa Fe. The Director of Utilities also recommended that capacity in addition to the twelve (12) inch line be installed as recommended in the CH2M /Hill Plan for the water system. If the larger sixteen (16) inch line is installed, the Director of Utilities recommended that the cost of the twelve (12) inch line be assessed to the property owners and the oversizing be paid by the Utilities • • I • • ( • City Manager McCown February 22, 1978 Page -2- • • • , The total cost of a sixteen (16) inch line plus spur is estimated at $147,000, A twelve (12) inch line plus spur is estimated at $115,ooo. Therefore, the amount assessed to the property owner would be $115,000 while the Utilities would pay $32,ooo. This $115,000 in property owner cost would be assessed as part of an improvement district. This normally would mean that the construction cost would be paid for by the issuance of a bond, Property owners could pay their share immediately or over a period of ten years as part of their tax assessmen~ The actual assessment would be made on the basis of square foot of property owned, and at a total project cost of $115,000, the square foot cost would come to $ .109. (Attached is a separate sheet indicating how this would work out per property), Th~ time necessary to establish the district and begin construc-tion would be approximately six months. gw I • • n , • - • • TENTATIVE ASSESSMENT RATE ( SANTA FE ANNEXATION AREA Property Tentative Semi-Annual Pay- Owner Area Assessment ment at 8% for Ten Years Knoedler 34,591.7 sq. ft. $ 3,804.58 $ 279.98 Hunt 42,143 sq. ft. $ 4,635.11 $ 341.05 Santa Fe Florists 206,013.3 sq. ft. $22,658.43 $1,667.22 Coffelt 1,148.5 sq. ft. $ 126.32 $ 9.27 F-orbes 219,273.9 sq. ft. $24,116.91 $1,774.57 Cockerham 220,778.9 sq. ft. $24,282.43 $1,786.71 Tague 55,964.3 sq. ft. $ 6,155.25 $ 452.90 Yanish 56,912.2 sq . ft. $ 6,259.51 $ 460.55 Ragsdale 98,050.2 sq. ft. $10,784.08 $ 793.51 0 ( Royce 41,141.9 sq. ft. $ 4,525.00 $ 332.96 Kittle 25,559.6 sq. ft. $ 2,811.18 $ 206.84 Verdos 44,017.1 sq. ft. $ 4,841.23 $ 356.21 TOTAL SOU ARE FOOTAGE: 1,045,594.6 TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST OF WATER IMPROVEMENTS: $115,000.00 COST PER SQUARE FOOT : $.109 I • • •• ( ( ( • • • - TENTATIVE ANNEXATION SCHEDULE With E£ conditions, ~ if 100% agree to conditions: Now thru March 1, 1978 March 6, 1978 April 10, 1978 April 17, 1978 May 1, 1978 June 1, 1978 Submit petition to City Clerk. Council passes resolution finding substantial compliance of annexa- tion petition with State Statutes and shall establish a date, time and place for a Public Hearing. Public Hearing. First reading of Ordinance. Final passage of Ordinance. Effective date of annexation. With conditions and not 100% agreement: Now thru March 1, 1978 March 6, 1978 April 10, 1978 April 17, 1978 May 1, 1978 May 15, 1978 June 15, 1978 July 3, 1978 July 17, 1978 August 17, 1978 Submit petition to City Clerk. Council passes resolution finding substantial compliance of annexa- tion petition with State Statutes and shall establish a date, time and place for a Public Hearing. Public Hearing. Council determines election necessary and petitions District Court. Court appoints three election commissioners. Commissioners establish June 1~ 1978, as election day. Election Annexation Ordinance passed on first reading. Ordinance passed. Effective date of annexation. • 0 I • • • , • • • 0 PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION . ........ , : WEST UMON------------ ' ..... : ,_ : ...... : \. . ' -----EXISTING WATER LIN£ PROPoSED WATER LINE • • • CITY COUNCIL MeETING MAY tl , 1978 • • - , ORDINANCE # 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 RESOLUTION # 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 • 0 0 I . .