HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978-05-08 (Special) Meeting Agenda•
• -
•
0
CITY COUNCIL HEETING -SPECIAL
May d, 1978
•
-
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Hoved Seconded
1 ·-Pyye ~: ... ,1 f 11 m-" . __ l ,..... I
:>ma r:
Harn~rr._ I
Clayton I
Mann '
Mayor Ta y_,Ed
-Ji!L ~~~~ -c_c-uJ c?Y~J_;(;h
;J_ ~J ./ /JZt~J-
cU ao fua_t .J-: lJJtJilV._~ L
{j_j_~dt__' >L<J
•
Nav
•
,
Absta fn Absent
I . .
• -
• •
ROLL CALL
H ed S d d A N Ab taf ov econ e :'}'e ~ s n sen WilHam!' ·---...J::::._
_1ieber JL_
2!!1._1_¥--~
Ab t
J:lm!~-K Cl~ton ....L::.:::::: Mann _1 ~ ~or fa y~ _9 r .1 K
• I . •
• •
,
•
• .. •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded
Wi1 1 ia"!.~-
Aye Nav Abstain Absent
-w .. h.... ·-
:>m1tr. -Haro!:r._
Cliivton
Mann I
Jllayor TO:y_l_£J r 1
I . •
•
,
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Ave Nav Absta 1n Absent
W1111am ~
IJ<>h<>r
sm1 r.
Hare~
Clavton
Mann L
Mayor Ta y~ !'U
J U'lL'I l q__ /I!U ,,~,. __ .. /
/ . ~ ) c
f 17 --) ,/ 1 cr-f (A
C---a /0 u Q.J
J, c_~( ~~-/
I . .
• •
-
7:30 P.M.
1.
•
• •
AGENDA FOR THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF
THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
MAY 8, 1978
r
Call to order, invocation, pledge of allegiance and
roll call.
Public Hearing.
(a) To consider the annexation of property
located in the Santa Fe Drive/Union Avenue
area of Arapahoe County to the City of
Englewood. (Copies enclosed.)
2 Adjournment.
ph
I • •
(
(
•
(
•
TO :
FROM :
DATE :
SUBJECT:
,
•
• •
Members of Englewood City Council rC\
William D. James, Director of Finance r~~
March 2, 1978
Annexation Petitions
The City Clerk's Office is in receipt of three petitions re-
questing annexation of property contiguous to Englewood in
the vicinity of Union Avenue and Santa Fe Drive.
According to the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965, i t is re-
quired that I inform City Council that these petitions are
in custody of the City Clerk's Office.
cc : Jimmy E. Curnes, Acting City Manager
•
I • •
(
1 Royce
2 Kittle
3 Verdes
4 Knoedler
•
,
•
• -
SANTA FE ANN EXATI ON PETI TIO NS
I
I
' I
I r----·-
!
' I
' ' ::::::---=--::::----
.................. :
..... , :
....... : ,, : ......
' ' ' ' : ' ..... : ' L----......._·
5 Hunt
6 Santa Fe Florists
7 Tague
8 Yanish
9 Ragsdale
10 Cockerham
11 Forbes
12 Coffelt
•
• •
•
• •
TO:
FROM:
City Managfl!c own
'I
Richard s./ anush, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 22, 1978
SUBJECT: Recommended Conditions to Santa Fe Annexation
After reviewing the water and fire fighting requirements for
the proposed Santa Fe annexation with the Director of Utilities
and the Fire Chief, we recommend that the construction of a
water main between the City's sixteen (16) inch line on Union
Avenue and its fourteen (14) inch line on West Oxford Avenue
be made a condition of annexation. We arrived at this recom-
mendation after reviewing the existing service and concluding
that the existing three {3) inch line is totally inadequate b service the area.
The Fire Chief also reviewed his department's capability of
fighting fire with the existing service and concluded that
only the property frontage along West Union Avenue could be
efficiently serviced. The remainder of the property and the
rear of the properties along West Union Avenue could not be
efficiently reached without the severe disruption of vehicular
and rail traffic along South Santa Fe and without so tying up
such a large portion of our fire fighting equipment that service
to the remainder of Englewood would be seriously impaired,
Options of providing service were examined, including the use
of the existing Denver transmission lines along West Quincy
or West Radcliff . The Director of Utilities contacted the
Denver Water Board and concluded that they would not permit
their service to extend within the City limits of Englewood,
There was also some question as to whether the Denver Water
Board would permit a dead-end hydrant to tap onto its large
transmission lines.
Both the Fire Chief and Director of Utilities agreed that the
minimum fire flow to provide adequate fire protection in the
type area such as this, is 5,000 gallons per minute. This
fire flow can be delivered with a twelve (12) inch tie betwem
Oxford and Union along Santa Fe. The Director of Utilities
also recommended that capacity in addition to the twelve (12)
inch line be installed as recommended in the CH2M /Hill Plan
for the water system. If the larger sixteen (16) inch line
is installed, the Director of Utilities recommended that the
cost of the twelve (12) inch line be assessed to the property
owners and the oversizing be paid by the Utilities •
•
I • •
(
•
City Manager McCown
February 22, 1978
Page -2-
•
• •
,
The total cost of a sixteen (16) inch line plus spur is
estimated at $147,000, A twelve (12) inch line plus spur
is estimated at $115,ooo. Therefore, the amount assessed
to the property owner would be $115,000 while the Utilities would pay $32,ooo.
This $115,000 in property owner cost would be assessed as
part of an improvement district. This normally would mean
that the construction cost would be paid for by the issuance
of a bond, Property owners could pay their share immediately
or over a period of ten years as part of their tax assessmen~
The actual assessment would be made on the basis of square foot
of property owned, and at a total project cost of $115,000,
the square foot cost would come to $ .109. (Attached is a
separate sheet indicating how this would work out per property), Th~ time necessary to establish the district and begin construc-tion would be approximately six months.
gw
I • •
n
,
• -
• •
TENTATIVE ASSESSMENT RATE
( SANTA FE ANNEXATION AREA
Property Tentative Semi-Annual Pay-
Owner Area Assessment ment at 8% for
Ten Years
Knoedler 34,591.7 sq. ft. $ 3,804.58 $ 279.98
Hunt 42,143 sq. ft. $ 4,635.11 $ 341.05
Santa Fe
Florists 206,013.3 sq. ft. $22,658.43 $1,667.22
Coffelt 1,148.5 sq. ft. $ 126.32 $ 9.27
F-orbes 219,273.9 sq. ft. $24,116.91 $1,774.57
Cockerham 220,778.9 sq. ft. $24,282.43 $1,786.71
Tague 55,964.3 sq. ft. $ 6,155.25 $ 452.90
Yanish 56,912.2 sq . ft. $ 6,259.51 $ 460.55
Ragsdale 98,050.2 sq. ft. $10,784.08 $ 793.51 0
( Royce 41,141.9 sq. ft. $ 4,525.00 $ 332.96
Kittle 25,559.6 sq. ft. $ 2,811.18 $ 206.84
Verdos 44,017.1 sq. ft. $ 4,841.23 $ 356.21
TOTAL SOU ARE FOOTAGE: 1,045,594.6
TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST OF WATER IMPROVEMENTS: $115,000.00
COST PER SQUARE FOOT : $.109
I • •
••
(
(
(
•
•
• -
TENTATIVE ANNEXATION SCHEDULE
With E£ conditions, ~ if 100% agree to conditions:
Now thru March 1, 1978
March 6, 1978
April 10, 1978
April 17, 1978
May 1, 1978
June 1, 1978
Submit petition to City Clerk.
Council passes resolution finding
substantial compliance of annexa-
tion petition with State Statutes
and shall establish a date, time
and place for a Public Hearing.
Public Hearing.
First reading of Ordinance.
Final passage of Ordinance.
Effective date of annexation.
With conditions and not 100% agreement:
Now thru March 1, 1978
March 6, 1978
April 10, 1978
April 17, 1978
May 1, 1978
May 15, 1978
June 15, 1978
July 3, 1978
July 17, 1978
August 17, 1978
Submit petition to City Clerk.
Council passes resolution finding
substantial compliance of annexa-
tion petition with State Statutes
and shall establish a date, time
and place for a Public Hearing.
Public Hearing.
Council determines election
necessary and petitions District
Court.
Court appoints three election
commissioners.
Commissioners establish June 1~
1978, as election day.
Election
Annexation Ordinance passed on
first reading.
Ordinance passed.
Effective date of annexation.
•
0
I • •
•
,
•
• •
0
PROPOSED WATER MAIN INSTALLATION
. ........ , :
WEST UMON------------
' ..... : ,_ : ......
: \. . '
-----EXISTING WATER LIN£
PROPoSED WATER LINE
•
•
•
CITY COUNCIL MeETING
MAY tl , 1978
•
• -
,
ORDINANCE # 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15
RESOLUTION # 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45
•
0
0
I . .