HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971-07-06 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet• "'-
-
0 -
•
Council Meeting July 'I, 1971
•
-
•
•
•
AGENDA FOR
REGULAR COUNCIL SESSION
JULY 6, 1971
8:00 P.M. Call to order, invocation by Msgr. Bernard Cullen of the St. Louis
Catholic Church, pledge of allegiance led by Boy Scout Troop No.
154, and roll call .
1. Minute s .
(a) Regular mee ting of June 21, 1971. (Copies trans-
mitted herewith.)
2. Pre-scheduled c iti zens and visitors.
(a) Recognition of ·•special guests" of the Council.
(b) Mr. Harold Rust, Englewood Manager of the Public
Service Company , will be present to present the
franchise check.
(c) Mr. J. F. DeVivier, former chairman of the Board
of Career Service Commissioners, will be present
to receive a plaque from the Council recognizing
his long standing service to the City.
(d) Mr. Les Howe will be present to request a renewal
of 3. 2 beer license for Sport Bowl, 3295 S. Broadway.
3. Public hearings.
(a) To consider amendment of Zoning Ordinance to in-
crease residential parking requirements. (Copies
0f some information previously transmitted to the
Council is enclosed. )
(b) To consider the request of Mr. RobertS. Briola dba
Bob's Grocery and Market, 3296 South Washington
Street, t o secure a 3. 2% fermented malt beverage
license .
4. Communications.
(a) Petitions from property owners on West Baker Avenue
protesting new survey by the City which was required
in order to determine center lines of streets in North-
west Englewood.
(b) Minutes of th e Workable Program Citizens' Committee
mee ting of May 12, 1971. (Copies transmitted here-
with.)
(c) Minutes of the Workable Program Citizens ' Committee
meeting of June 3, 1971 . (Copies transmitted here-
with ,)
(d ) Minutes of th e Workabl e Progra m Citi ze ns' Committee
m eeting of June 17, 1971. (Copie s transmitted here-
with .)
(e ) Minut e s of the ARAPS Board of Direc tor s meeting of
June 16 , 1971. (Copies transmitted h e rewith.)
(Continued )
,._
I • •
'I .· ' I
' I
'r
J -
•
AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCIL SESSION
JULY 6, 1971
Page 2
4. Communications. (Continued)
(f) Minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of
June 15, 1971 . (Copies transmitted herewith.)
(1) Memorandum recommending the approval
of proposed Supplement No. 2 to Connector's
Agreement with the Greenbelt Sanitation
District.
(g) Memorandum and staff report from Mr. James
L. Supinger, Planning Director, dated June 23,
1971, to Council with regard to vacation of utility
easement in the 3100 block between South Delaware
and South Elati Streets. (Copies of memo, staff
report, and minutes of the meeting of the Planning
and Zoning Commissi<m of June 22, 1971 transmitted
herewith. Bill for an ordinance to be ready for
Council meeting.)
5. City Attorney.
(a) Ordinance on final reading establishing Sidewalk
Improvement District No. 71. (Copies previously
transmitted.)
(b) Ordinance on final reading vacating a portion of
the Broadway-Acoma Alley, located from West
Hampden Avenue on the north to Little Dry Creek
on the South.
(c) Memorandum from the City Attorney to Mr. Stanley
H. Dial, City Manager, stating the City's obligation
to enforce parking requirement on City-owned
property around Cinderella City Shopping Center.
(Copies transmitted herewith.)
(d) Attorney's choice.
6. City Manager.
(a) Resolution appropriating funds to Police Department
for an alcohol mobil unit. (Memorandum from Stephen
A. Lyon, Director of Finance, and copy of resolution
appropriating fund to Police Dept. transmitted herewith.)
(b) Memorandum from the City Manager, Stanley H. Dial,
concerning the possibility of contracting for Custodial
Services at the various City buildings. (Copies trans-
mitted herewith.)
7. Recognition of non-scheduled citizens and visitors.
8. General discussion.
(a) Mayor's choice.
(b) Councilman's choice.
9. Adjournment. ' _5.7~;1 If ,I::> -_;1
STANLEY H.--IlJAL f
City Manager
SHD/mm
•
. (
I • •
'
1-=--
•
• ,_
C ITY 0 F F I C I A C'"' Jr>J.-IL L'
I • -,., D ~C UMEN:J
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMA.>< LAY ... ''!~ ) '11
BY AlrrHORITY C OUtv II r.
CITY O F EN G~~I:.I/.',"G FILE:
ORD INANCE NO. ~, SERIES OF 1971 Wo oo, COLU
AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN IMPROVE~~NT DISTRICT, TO
BE KNO\-'N AS SIDEWALK IMPROVEHENT DISTRICT NO, 71; ORD ERIN G THE CONSTRUCTION
THER EI N OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS TO
BID UPON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH UlPROVEHENTS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, pursuant
to the Charter and Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1964, of said City and the Laws
of the State of Colorado, hereby finds and determines that there exists a neces-
sity for the creation of Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71, in said City,
and the construction therein of sidewalk improvements, as described herein; and
WHEREAS , the City Council has heretofore directed the Director of
Public Works to prepare plans, specifications, maps and schedules in accordance
with said laws; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has .prepared all the maps and
certificates of his survey, as well as schedules, plans, specifications,
approxima tions of cost, and all other matters and things in complete form
and substance as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the said maps and certificates of his survey, as well as
schedules, plans, specifications, approximations of cost, and all other
matters are hereby approved and adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing conc.erning the creation of the
District and the construction of the improvements therein and upon this
ordinance has been published once a week for three weeks in the Englewood
Herald, a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and, in addition, a
copy of the Notice has been mailed, postage prepaid, to each known owner of
real property within the proposed District; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place specif ied in said Not i ce, the.City
Council met in open session for the purpose of hearing any objections or
protests that might be made against said improvements; and
WHEREAS, all objections and complaints having been duly heard and
considered, the Council has determined that such objections should be denied
except as this ordinance has accepted them and incorporated hl ~ein changes
in said District based upon said objections.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71 is hereby created
and the improvements hereinafter described, consisting of certain sidewalk
improvements, are duly ordered after Notice duly given and Hearing duly held,
all as requ red by law .
Section 2. The extent of the District to be assessed for the cost
of the improvements shall be all the real property specially benefited and as
more particularly set forth in the Notice of Hearing as provided by a Reso-
lu~ion of the City Council passed and adopted on the 17th day of May, 1971.
The kind of improvements and the sidewalks on which such improvements shall
be as follows:
Necessary installations, removal and replaceme nt of concrete
sidewalks, curb and gutter,. together with the appurtenances
and incidental s , in the City's right-of-way contiguous to the
following proper ties:
Locatjon
1200 East Dartmouth 1-4
46-51
23-26
16
16
J.O
Subdivision
Evanston Broadway Addition 2nd
Filing
Evanston Broadway Addition 2nd
Filing
W.H. Betts 1st Addition to
Ev.1nston
. ,
I • •
.• ' r
I ' '!
•
•
Location Lots Block Subdivision
3200 ·South Delaware 1-13 1 Park Addition 2nd Filing
13-24 2 Park Addition 2nd Filing
1-12 1 s.G. Hamlins Broadway
Addition
3100 South Fox 12-22 1 Corder Subdivision
1-12 Uhlman Subdivision
Two unplatted pieces of property , as follows:
Beginning at a point on North line of Oxford Street which is 489 feet
west and 50 feet north of SE corner of NE l/4 of SE l/4 Section 4-5-68;
thence W 133 feet along N line of Oxford Street; thence North 162 feet;
thence East 133 feet; thence South 162 feet to beginning; except North
35 feet Section 4-5-68 {955 West Oxford).
Beginning 489 feet West and 177 feet North of SE corner of NE l/4 of
SE 1/4 of Section 4-5-68; thence North 35 feet; thence West 133 feet;
thence South 35 feet; thence East 133 feet to beginning.
Section 3. Said District shall be known as the same is hereby desig-
nated "Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71," in Englewood, Colorado.
Section 4. The construction of said sidewalk improvements in and
for said District, as shown by the plans, specifications and maps thereof,
prepared by the Director of Public Works and approved by the City Council of
the City .of Englewood and now on file in the office of the Director of Public
Works, be and the same is hereby authorized and ordered, the material to be
used with such maps, plans and specifications.
Section 5. The estimated total cost of said improvements is $8,624.00;
it is proposed that the City of Englewood will pay approximately $1,327.00 to-
ward the total cost of said improvements . The balance of the total probable cost
{being approximately $7,297.00) is to be paid by special assessments to be
levied upon each parcel of the real property hereinabove described. The approxi-
mate share of the total cost to be assessed per front foot upon any lot or tract
of land fronting or abutting on said improvements is set forth in the Notice of
He a ring, as provided by a Resolution adopted and passed by t~~ City Council on
the 17th day of May, and is:
Vertical curb and gutter $4.88 per lin. ft.
4" rurbwalk type I 6.38 per lin. ft.
6" curbwalk type I 7.13 per lin. ft.
Sidewalk {4" thick) 1.28 per sq. ft.
Driveway {6" thick) 1.65 per sq. ft.
Crosspan {6" thick-wire mesh) 2.03 per sq. ft.
Removal of old vertical curb and gutter 1.88 per lin. ft.
Removal of old curbwalk 2.25 per lin. ft.
Removal of old sidewalks 0.38 per sq. ft.
Removal of old cros s pan 0.53 per sq. ft.
Saw concrete 3.75 per lin. ft.
Concrete steps 7.88 per step ft.
Section 6. All assessments levied against the aforesaid parcels of
real prope rty will be du e and payable , without demand, within thirty days from
and after the fin a l publica tions of an ordinance assessing the costs of said
improveme nts ag a ins t the rea l property in the district. In case any owner of
real prope rty sh 11 f a il to p .:~y the whole of such assess ment against his
property with i n said thirty d a y s , the n the pro rata cost of said improvements
- 2 -
I • •
•' \ ( ,
-•
so assessed against his property, together with interest at the rate of six
per cent (64 ) per annum on any unpaid balance, shall be payable in five equal
annual installments. The first of such installments of principal and interest
shall be due and payable at such time as may be determined in and by the
asses s ing ordinance, and the remainder of said installments shall be due and
payable successively on the same day of each year thereafter, until all are
paid in full.
Section 7. The }!ayor and Director of Finance are hereby authorized
to advertise for bids to construct such improvements in three (3) consecutive
weekly issues of a newspaper of general circulation, which advertisements may
run concurrently with the publication of this Ordinance.
Section 8. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the
improvements proposed to be constructed and installed will confer a special
benefit upon the property within the District and a general ben~fit upon the
City as a whole.
Section 9. All ordinances, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed. This Ordinance, after . its final passage, shall be recorded
in a book kept for that purpose, shall be authenticated by the signatures of
the Mayor and Director of Finance, shall be published in said City.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on the 21st
day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 23rd day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the ~6-~~--___ day of
~ i':;r , 1971. ·•
Published by title as Ordinance No. ,.;t(l , Series of 1971, on
the H~ day of Q.rd L'L , 1971.
1/ '
•
·~
7 MAYOR
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and complete copy of an Ordinance, passed on final reading
and published in full as Ordinance No. ~· Series of 1971. •
- 3 -
. '
•.
I • •
•
. • \ ! '
]~-....
•
•
C F ;-11 'C. '. '. e m ~ C.:)l , ... '~-,1_! ...... : .. ':
1,,4 , Lt ,,, . .1
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN LAY.
COUi 'C:L 1 .. ..:..~,~~ .. \,J J·JL E
.Ct'r.::.: OS ENGLEWOoD. COLa.
BY AUTHORITY
-) ORDINANCE NO. ~ / SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE BROADWAY/ACOMA
ALLEY, LOCATED FROM WEST HAMPDEN AVENUE ON THE NORTH
TO LITTLE DRY CREEK ON THE SOUTH, WHICH PORTION IS
WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AS RECORDED; RETAINING
AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF THE
ALLEY FOR ALL UTILITIES, SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE STORM DRAINAGE.
WHEREAS, there presently exists a public alley lying
between West Hampden Avenue on the north and Little Dry
Creek on the south, known as the Broadway/Acoma Alley; and
WHEREAS, Key Savings and Loan Association has
agreed to construct a pedestrian ~-·~kway to be dedicated
to public use as access to the park land south of Dry
Creek in lieu of said alley; and
WHEREAS, a parking lot layout and landscaping plan
of said Key Savings and Loan Association will be con-
tingent upon approval by the City of Englewood Planning
and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the City of Englewood has heretofore recommended that
said alley hereinafter described be vacated; and
WHEREAS, all of the land adjoining said alley is
contained within the City of Englewood, Colorado and
does not constitute a boundary line between the City of
Englewood and any county or other municipality; and
WHEREAS, should said alley be vacated, no land
adjoining said alley shall be without an established
public road connecting said land with another estab-
lished public road.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. That the following described alley
located within the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado be and the same is hereby vacated; to-wit:
All of that portion of the Broadway/Acoma
Alley, located from West Hampden Avenue on the
north to Little Dry Creek on the south, which
portion is all within the City of Englewood,
Arapahoe County, Colorado.
-1-
. '
•.
I . •
· . •' I (
I . , ' !
J -
'.
' • •
•
•
Section 2. Provided, however, that the City of
Englewood shall retain and shall reserve the right to
install, maintain; operate, repair and replace by it-
self or by any licensee or holder of a franchise from
the City, any poles, wires, pipes, conduits, sewer
mains and water mains or any other utility now located
in the alley or any portion thereof vacated by this
ordinance. And provided further, that the City of Engle-
wood hereby reserves the right to install and maintain
in that portion of the vacated alley, surface and sub-
surface storm drainage facilities.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first
reading on the 21st day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 23rd
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the
&. ~ da:, of 9"~;• , 1971.
Published by title as .Ordinance No. ~~~~-------•
Series of 1971 on the fi "if> day of Q-<&-1~-· , 1971. '7r" d
f;~Jw,.J,
2 • Mayor _
Attest:
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing · is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed on final and
published by title as Ordinance No. , Series
of 1971.
-2-
. '
. '
I . •
0
.. ·' \ I
I ' '!
r
•
•
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE . NO. -· )_ , . SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINA NCE N-1ENDING CHAPTER 22.5-5a(l0) OF THE COMPRE-
HENSI VE ZONING ORDINANCE , ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1963,
ENTITLED, "PRIVATE OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS FOR RESI-
DE I\l'fiAL USES", BY INCREASING THE REQUIRED OFF-STREET
PARKIN G REQUIREMENT S FOR RESIDENTIAL USES.
WHEREAS, studies indicate that in just t\'lO decades
or twenty years, between 1950 and 1970, the number of
pas senger cars in use in the United States has mor~ than
doubled from 33 million cars to an estimated 79 million
cars; and
WHEREAS, with the continued prosperity and rising
standards of living, an even greater increase in the
number of ~assenger vehicles in use is to be expected
in the nex~ two decades; and
WHEREAS, mass transit -systems presently in the em-
bryo and creative stages have not come to fruition in
the. Metropolitan Denver area; and
WHEREAS, from statistics provided by the United
States Government, projected passenger car usage in the
United States in the year 1975 will have increased to
102 million cars; and
~~EREAS, in view of the extreme cr1s1s presented
by automobile trans~ortation in metropolitan areas; and
WHEREAS, the congestion of automobile traffic
on neighborhood and collector streets bears ~ direct
relationship to the public health, welfare and safety
of the citizens and residents of the City of Englewood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEt-JOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1. That Chapter 22.5-5a(l0) of the Compre-
heniive Zoning Ordin ance , Ordin ance No. 26, Series of
1963, is hereby amended to read as follm.;s:
22.5-5a. Minimum Standards
In consonance with the purpose of zoning
r egulations , as stated in this Comprehensive Zoning
Ordin ance , "to lessen congestion in the streets",
the follm.;ing are minimum standards for parking
sp aces to be maintained in connection with the
buildings and uses indicated; however, nothing in
-1-
•.
I . •
·' \ I
I ' or
1--
•
•
the s e st a nd ards sh a ll b e deeme d to d e prive the
mm e rs or o pe r a t o r s of s a id b ui ldings or uses of
the right to ma in ta in c ont rol ove r all such land
and st r:uctures or to make Hh a t e v e r change s they
deem ~ppro pria t e f o r the u se of s uch private off-
stree t park ing sp ace .
(10) Sing l e -Fam ily D\ve lling ..... Two (2)
sp a c es pe r each d\ve lling unit.
1\vo or More Fam ily D\ve !lings:
Efficie ncy Unit ..... One (1) space
per each dw e lling unit.
One or 1\vo Be droom Units ..... One and
one-half (1-1/2) spaces per each
dwelling unit.
Three or More Bedroom Units ..... Two
(2) spaces per each dwelling unit.
i · "Efficiency Unit" as used herein, shall
mean a dwelling unit consisting of one room and
including a bathroom, kitchen, hallway, closets
and dining alcove directly off of the principal
room, providing such dining alcove does not 'ex-
ceed 125 sq. ft. in area.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first rea4ing
on the 7th d a y of June, 1971.
Published as ~ Bill for an Ordinance on the 16th
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final rearl!~g on the
? r;t. day of ~J-., , 1971.
(/ .
Published by title as Ordinance No. ~ :U ,
Series of 1971 on the 1•1-ri day of 7~"-/.:--<j---=-1971.
Attest :
-2-
,._
' I
I . •
.. \ I
I .,.
I
•
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. ~.;J__.., , Series
of 1971.
-3-
. ,
I· •
. , ,
2
•
•
•
C tl'y Of:",_ rou r-1c -Rt'..C(tr.. J
0
4 ·o
1 R N -ro Ct::nPrr,..__ ,., ···~ e-. . , s ?,
§f;-OUI !;_'
,.. 0~ ·-1 .. : .
€", •IG:._..,. -J ,,
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN SENTI. '.V.VD.q~ F="fL~ ·~6( ~
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE . NO. -')_ , . SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22.5-5a(10) OF THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1963,
,_
OFFI CI ~L CJDl COUNCIL DOCUMENT
I'!!TU~N TO
INTER-OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
JUL 6 '11
CQUNCIL MEETING t'I L.~
, ~ • 5NG' swoop.~
TO: Stanley H. Dial, City Manager July 1, 1971
FROM: Stephen A. Lyon, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Highway Safety Project Grant for Police Department
The Englewood Pollee Department has obtained a highway safety
project grant for its alcohol safety program in the amount of $4, 920. 00.
This grant covers the purchase of a vehicle with radio and emergency equi~F
ment.
Because the vehicle will remain the property of the City of
Englewood, a resolution is attached appropriating the grant to the Police
Department. Personnel costs have already been appropriated and the
officer is currently on duty with the department. In affect, the City is
being given credit for these costs.
SAL: df1
Attachment
. '
. '
•.
I . •
·' \ I
I
!
1-
•
TO:
•
0
•
(,
INTER-OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
OFFICIAL ~ COUNCIL pocu~tNT
A!TUitN TO
JUL 6 ~11
CQUNCIL MEETING f'IL.~
._.llllif"A-&WOOP. f;:Qio6
July l, 1971
FROM: Stephen A. Lyon, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Highway Safety Project Grant for Police Department
The Englewood Pollee Department has obtained a highway safety
project grant for its alcohol safety program in the amount of $4,920. 00.
This grant covers the purchase of a vehicle with radio and emergency equip-
ment.
Because the vehicle will remain the property of the City of
Englewood, a resolutioo is attached appropriating the grant to the Police
Department. Personnel costs have already been appropriated and the
officer is currently on duty with the department. In affect, the City is
being given credit for these costs.
SAL: dfl
Attachment
"/ /KJ; ~q_,
Stephen A. L on
. .
•.
I • •
. • \ I
I f
'!'
-
•
•
0 -
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS TO THE ENGLEWOOD POLICE
DEPARTMENT FOR AN ALCOHOL MOBILE UNIT.
WHEREAS, The Englewood Police Department has received a federal
grant approval under the Highway Traffic Safety Administration for $4,920.00
to purchase an alcohol mobile unit,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section I. The following financial transaction is hereby authorize d:
Increase in Revenue Estimate
General Fund, Miscellaneous Income $ 4, 920 .00
Appropriation of Funds
Police Department, Capital Outlay $ 4, 920.00
Section 2. The City Manager and Director of Finance are hereby
authorized and directed to make the above changes to the 1971 appropriations
of the City of Englewood, Colorado.
;-
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this &. t?} day of 94 ' 1971 .
~M a or
ATTEST:
Ex Officio City Clerk 7
I, St phen A. L on, e officio City Clerk of th e City of Englewood,
Sate of Co lorado, do hereb certify that th above and fore going Is a tru ,
accurate, a nd compl te t'OP of Resolution No, 2~, Series of 1971.
Ex Officio City Clerk 1
I • •
• ' 'r
-
•
•
0 -
" r
RESOLUTION NO. 32-, SERIES 0 1971
1 • ._ o. r
I
... j
o oo,c
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS TO THE ENGLEWOOD POLICE
DEPARTMENT FOR AN ALCOHOL MOBILE U NIT.
WHEREAS, The Englewood Police Department has received a federal
grant approval under the Highway Traffic Safety Administration for $4,920.00
to purc hase an alcohol mobil e unit,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY T HE CITY COUN CIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follow s:
Section I. The following finan cial transaction is he reby a uthorized:
Increase in Revenue Estimate
General Fund, Miscellaneous Income $ 4, 920 .00
Appropriation of F unds
P olice Department, Ca pital Outlay $ 4 , 920.00
Section 2. Th e City Manager and Director of Finance are hereby
a uthori zed a nd directed to make the above c h a nges to the 1971 a pp ropri ations
of the City of Englewood, Colorado.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED thi s &"0 day of ~~. , 1971 .
Ma yor
I, Ste ph e n A. Lvon, ex o ffi c i o City Clerk of th e City of Engl e wood,
Sate of Colora do, d o hc r e b e rtify that the above and foregoing Is a true,
accurate , a nd c ompl ete copy o f Resolution No. Se ries of 1971.
' r
'r
I •
. '
•
,
• I
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE . NO. -)_ , . SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22.5-5a(l0) OF THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDI NANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1963,
ENTITLED, "PRIVATE OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS FOR RESI-
DENTIAL USES", BY INCREASING THE REQUIRED OFF-STREET
PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES.
WHEREAS, studies indicate that in just two decades
or twenty years, between 1950 and 1970, the number of
passenger cars in use in the United States has more than
doubled from 33 million cars to an estimated 79 million
cars; and
WHEREAS, with the continued prosperity and rising
standards of living, an even greater increase in the
number of ~assenger vehicles in use is to be expected
in the nex~ two decades; and
WHEREAS, mass transit -systems presently in the em-
bryo and creative stages have not come to fruition in
th~ Metropolitan Denver area; and
WHEREAS, from statistics provided by the United
States Government, projected passenger car usage in the
United States in the year 1975 will have increased to
102 million cars; and
WHEREAS, in view of the extreme crisis presented
by automobile trans~ortation in metropolitan areas; and
WHEREAS, the congestion of automobile traffic
on neighborhood and collector streets bears a direct
relationship to the public health, welfare and safety
of the citizens and residents of the City of Englewood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1. That Chapter 22.5-5a(l0) of the Compre-
h ens-ive Zoning Ordin a nce, Ordinance No. 26, Series of
1963, is h e reby amended to read as follows:
22.5-5a. Minimum Standards
In consonance with the purpose of zoning
regulations, as stated in this Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, "to lessen congestion in the streets",
the following are minimum standards for parking
spaces to be maintained in connection with the
buildings and uses indicated; however, nothing in
-1-
' ,
•.
I . •
'
•
•
these standards shall be deemed to deprive the
owners or operators of said buildings or uses of
the right to maintain control over all such land
and structures or to make whatever changes they
deem appropriate for the use of such private off-
street parking space.
(10) Single-Family Dwelling ..... Two (2)
spaces per each dwelling unit.
Two or More Family Dwellings:
Efficiency Unit ..... One (1) space
per each dwelling unit.
One or Two Bedroom Units •.•.• One and
one-half (1-1/2) spaces per each
dwelling unit.
Three or More Bedroom Units •.... Two
(2) spaces per each dwelling unit.
i· "Efficiency Unit" as used herein, shall
mean a dwelling unit consisting of one room and
including a bathroom, kitchen, hallway, closets
and dining alcove directly off of the principal
room, providing such dining alcove does not ex-
ceed 125 sq. ft. in area.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reaqing
on the 7th day of June, 1971.
Published as ~ Bill for an Ordinance on the 16th
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the
t-rL> day of Y~'Y , 1971.
(/
Published by title as Ordinance No. ~~~~~------·
Series of 1971 on the 1'1-cl day of )/'~ /,} 1971.
~ / Mayor
-2-
. ,
·~
I . •
·. ·' \ !
I
'! ' 2
....... •
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. ~~ Series
of 1971.
-3-
. .
I . •
,
-
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN
AN ORDINANCE VACATING
LOCATED IN THE DOTSON
RECORDED .
c o•"
CITy GF L~ • ~ F"!LE
L>L £::: >'000 c
A PORTION OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT ' OLo.
SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, AS
A BILL FOR
WHEREAS, there pres e ntly exists a utility easement
located in the Dotson Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Englewood has heretofore recommended that the major portion
of said utility easement hereinafter described be vacated; and
WHEREAS, all the land adjoining said utility easement is
contained within the City of Englewood, Colorado.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section l. That the following described utility ease-
ment, located within the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado, be and the same is hereby vacated to-wit:
A sixteen-foot (16') utility easement running
north and south through the center of the Dotson
Subdivision, which subdivision is bounded on the
north by West Dartmouth Avenue, on the east by
South Delaware Street, on the south by West East-
man Avenue and on the west by South Elati Street;
excep t, however, the southerly twenty-five feet
(25') of said easement which is to be used by the
Ut ilitie s Department of the City of Englewood or by
any licensee or holder of a franchise from the City
for the maintenance of the manhole for a sewer line
se rving the Bishop School, and also, for the main-
tenance of existing facilities of the Public Ser-
vice Compan y -Electric Division.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on
the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the ~14~
day of Jf · '-7f , 1971.
IlL~~
/ Mayor
I , Steph n A. Lyon , do hereby certify that the above and
-1-
. '
•.
I . •
'
•
•
•
foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill
for an Ordinance, introduced , read in full and passed on
first reading on the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971 .
-2-
,._
..
'I
I . •
\ !
' 'f
f 2 I
•
REGULAR MEETING:
•
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO
JULY 6 , 1 971
The City Council of the City of Eng l ewo od , Arapa h o e County , Co lorado ,
met in r egu lar session on July 6 , 1 971 , at 8:00 P .M.
Mayor Schwab , p residing , cal l ed the meeting t o order .
The invocation was given by Father 8annigan o f the St . Louis Cathol ic
Church . P l edge of a llegiance was l ed by Boy Scout Troop No . 1 5 4.
The Ma yor asked for ro ll ca ll. Upon the call o f the r oll, the
fo llowing were p resent :
Counci lmen Brown , Dhority , Krei l ing , Lay , Sent i , Schw ab .
The Ma yor dec l ared a quorum p resent .
Al so p resent were: Assistant City Manager Mc Di v itt
City Atto rney Be r a rd i n i
Cit y Cl erk Lyon
* * * • *
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECON DED , THAT THE MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 21, 1 97 1, BE APPROVED AS READ. Upon the ca ll
o f the ro ll, the vote resu l ted as f ollows :
Ayes: Co unci lmen Brown , Dhority , Kr ei l ing , Lay , S e nti , Schwab .
Nays: No ne
Absent: None
The Mayor dec l ared the motio n carr i ed .
• * * • *
Mayor Schwab recognized Mr . and Mr s . Phi ll i p Ni ppe r, 3585 So uth
Mar~on Street , Precinct No . 8 , from the l ist of Specia l Citizen Prog r am
Invitees .
• * * * *
Mr . Harold Rus , Eng l ewood Manager of the Pu b l ic Se rv ice Company ,
a p peared before C~Ly Council and p resented a franchise check f o r the second
quarter of 1 97 1 in the amount of $37,000 ($12 ,500 for gas and $24 ,500 for
electr icityl.
* • * ••
Mayor Schwab stated that the resignation of Co unci l man Lone at
the June 21 , 1 971 , meeting had created a vacancy on the City Cou nci l which
by charter should be filled within thirty days . Mayor Schwab stated that
the application of Mr . Leo Lentsch, 1550 East Dartmouth Av enu e , had been
received p rior Lo Ju ly 1, 1971 , and that on Ju l y 6 , 1 97 1, the appl ication
of Mr. Edward Tanguma , 4389 South Sherman , was received .
Mayor Schwab read the pplic at ~on of Mr . Leo Lentsch . Directo r
of Finance Lyon read a l etter from Mr . Lentsch to members of Counci l stating
that he had dir cted his attorney to dismiss a case against t h e City of
Eng l e wood and th Co lor do Dep artm nt of Highways concern ing l eft t u rn
movement s at Bannock and u .s . 285 du to the construction o f t h e Bro adway-
u .s . 285 interchange . Mayor Schwab read the a p plication of Mr . Eddie Tanguma .
,._
I • •
f
-
•
•
-2 -
COUNCIL~mN LAY MOVED , COUNCI~N SENTI SECONDED, THAT MR. LEO LENTSCH,
1 550 EAST DARTMOUTH AVENUE , BE APPOINTE D TO FILL THE VACANCY OF COUN C I~N ON
THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL CREATED BY THE RESIGNATION OF FORMER COUNCI ~N
LONE AND , FURTHER , THAT A WHITE BALLOT BE CAST FOR HIS APPOINTMENT. Upon the
call of the roll , the vote resulted a s fo llows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority, Kreiling , Lay , Senti, Schwab .
Nays : None
Absent: None
The Mayor d ec l ared the mot ion carried .
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCI LMAN SENTI SECO NDED, T HAT THE AP POINT -
MENT OF COUNCILMAN LENTSCH BE EFFECTIVE JULY 6 , 1 9 71, TO THE END OF THE
UNEXPIRE D TERM OF FORMER COUNCI LMAN LONE , DE CE MB ER 3 1, 1971. Upon the c a ll
of the roll, the vote resulte d as f ollows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhority, Krei ling, Lay, Senti, S chwab.
Nays: None
Absent: None
The Ma yor d ec l a red the motion carried.
Mr. Leo Lentsch came forward and was sworn in by City C l erk Lyon.
* * * * *
Mr . Les Howe , 6611 South Logan Street, appeared before City Counci l
a nd r e quested the renewal o f a 3 .2 beer license for Sport Bowl, 3 295 South
Broadw a y.
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED , T HAT THE 3 .2
BEE R LICENSE FOR THE SPORT BOWL BE RENEWED FOR A PERIOD OF TWEI.VE MONTHS
EFFECTIVE JULY 1 6, 1971. Upon the c all of the roll, the vote resulted as
f ollows :
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhority, Kreiling, Lay, Lentsch, Senti,
Schwab.
Na y s: None
Absent : No ne
The Mayor declared the mot~on carried .
* • * • *
Mayor Schwab stated that Mr. J . F . DeVivier , f orme r chairman of
the Board of Career Service Comm issioners , was unable to a ttend the City
Council meeting to receive a plaque recogni z ing his service to the city.
* • * • *
COUNCI~N LAY MOVED , COUNCI ~N BROWN SECONDED , THAT THE PUBLIC
HEARING ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22.5 -5a(l0) OF THE COMPRE HENSIVE
ZONING ORDINANCE , ORDINANCE NO . 26 , SERIES OF 196 3 , ENTITLED , "PRIVATE OFF-
STREET PARKING STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES", BY INCREASING THE REQUIRED
OFF -STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES BE OPENED . Upon the
ca ll of the ro ll, the vote resu l ted as f ollows:
Ayes: Counc i lmen Brown , Dhority, Krei ling, Lay , Lentsch , Senti,
Schwab.
Nays: None
Abs nt: None
,_
\ I
I
~
I • •
'
.......
•
•
-3 -
The Ma yor d ecl a r ed the public hearing opened at 8:18 P .M.
NOTE : A tap e recording of the p ub l ic hearing is on file with
the official reco rds o f the City Cl e rk o f the July 6 ,
1 971, City Counci l meeti ng.
Listed below in order of first a ppea r a nce and pre s e ntation are the
individua l s who t e st ified at the hearing and the e xh ibits:
Mr. J am es L . Suping e r , P l a nning Director
Exhibit #1 --Pu b l ishe r 's Affidavit show ing publication on
J une 16 , 19 71, a nd June 2 3 , 1 9 71, o f No tice o f
Publ ic Hear ing on said Bill for an Ordinance.
Exhibit #2 --Me mo randum from Mr . James L . Supinger to City
Counc i l date d May 21, 1971.
Staf f Report dated May 4, 1 9 71.
Minute s o f the P l anning Commission meet ings of
May 4, 19 71, and May 18 , 19 71.
Me mora ndum to City Council s ubmitted by order
of Pl ann ing and Zoning Commi ssion dated Ma y 18,
1971, signe d by Gertrude We lty, Recording Secretary.
Reprint of Rathkopf on Zon ing , Chapter 75, Off-
St r eet Parking and Parking Lots.
Two p arking studies dated May 11, 1970, and
No vember 12, 1968 , revised May 11, 19 70, on
the City of Tustin, Ca l ifo rnia .
Mr . James L. Sup inger, P l anning Directo r , showed a sli d e presenta-
tion of the p arking situ ation within the City of Eng lewood.
Mr . S tep hen A. Lyon , Director o f Finance
Ex hibit #3 Letter from Mr . Ge orge H. Allen, President of
Geo . H. Alle n Construction Co., 3460 South Sherman
Street, Eng l ewood, recommending an increase in
off -s treet p a rking to two spaces per apartment.
Letter re a d to Council by Mr. Lyon.
Mr . H. R. Braun , Arch~t ec , 31 73 South Ogden , a ppeared a nd recommended an
incr ~a s e in o tf -street p arking to two s p aces per unit,
Mr. G. G. Peterson , D~rector o f the Chamber o f Comm e rce , a ppea red in favor
of incr eas~ng off -street p arking requ irem ents a nd stated tha t
the Board o f Directors of th Chamber of Commerce by poll
r ecomm >n d ed 1 minimum of t wo s p aces p e r a p artm e nt unit.
Ther we r no p e r sons a ppe aring ~n oppo s~tio n to the p r oposed Bi ll f or an
O rd~an ce ~ncreasing the off-street p arking f or residential use s .
COUNCIL MAN DH ORIT Y MOVED , COUNCI LMAN KREILING SECONDED , THAT THE
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED C ~INANCE INCREASING T HE REQUIRED OFF-STREET
lARKI NG RE UIRE MENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES BE CLOSED . Upon the ca ll o f the
ro ll, th vote r su l t e d as fo llows:
Ay s: Co unci lm n Brow n , Dhority , Kre i l ing , Lay , Lentsch, Senti ,
Schwab.
N ys : Non
Aba nt: Non
Th Mayo d~cl r ·d th pu b l~c h arinq c losed at 9:00 P .M.
I • •
f
•
•
•
- 4 -
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECON DED, THAT THE ORDINAN CE
INCREASING PARKING REQUIREMENTS BE TABLED FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION. Upon the
call of the roll, the vote resu lted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority , Kreiling , Lay , Lentsch , Senti ,
Schwab .
Nays: None
Absent: None
The Mayor declared the motion carrie d.
* * * * *
COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED , THAT THE
PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REQUEST FOR A 3 .2 FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE FOR
MR . ROBERT S . BRIOLA , DBA BOB 'S GROCERY AND MARKET , 3 296 SOUTH WASHINGTON
STREET , BE OPENED . Upon the call of the rol l, the v ote resulted as f ollows :
Ayes : Counci lmen Brown , Dho rity , Kr ei l ing , Lay , Lentsch, Senti,
Schwab .
Nays: None
Absent: None
The Mayor declared the public hearing opened at 9:05 P.M .
~: A tape recording of the public hearing is on fi le with
the official r eco rds of th City Clerk o f the Ju ly 6 ,
1971, City Counci l meeting.
Listed below in order o f first a ppearance and presentatio n are the
Lnd~vidua l s who testified at the hear~ng and the exhibits:
Mr . Stephen A. Lyon , Director o f Finance
Exhibit #l The City 's file on the a pplication of Mr. Robert s .
Briol a , dba Bob 's Grocery and Market, containing :
(a) Appl ication of Robert S . Briola, dba Bob's
Grocery and Market
(b) Po lic reports
(c) Notice of adv ertisement o f public hearing
(d) Letters of reference
(e) Memorandums from Mr. Ke lls Wagg oner , Director
of Public Works,and Mr . James L. Supinger,
P l anning Director
(f) List of l iquor outlets within the City o f
Eng l ewood
Mr . Edward o. Geer , Attorn ey , 1700 Broadway , Denver, Colorado.
Exhibit #2(a)-Petitions circu l ated in favor of the granting o f a
3 .2 ferro nted malt beverage license c o ntaining 412
signatures (count unverified by City Cl erk) •
2(b)-Petitions circulated in favor of the granting of a
3 .2 fermented malt bev erage l icense containing 40 3
signatures (count unverified by City Cl erk).
2(c)-Petitions circu l ated in favor of the granting of a
3 .2 fermented m lt beverage license containing 216
signatures (count unverified by City Cl erk).
2(d)-Petitions circu l ated in favor of the granting of a
3 .2 fermented malt beverage l icense containing 277
signatures (count unverified by City Cl erk).
. .
I • •
f \ {
' 1
1
•
•
-5 -
Mr . F r a nk E . Striker, Secretary a nd T reasure r of Market Service Associates,
1 3 21 E l ati , which company conducts public opinion surveys and who circu-
l ated t wo p etitions , above listed , totaling 815 signatures in favor.
Mr . Robert F. Schul tz , 3 219 South C l arkson, a ppear ed in favor.
Mr. Donald Goodger , 33 58 South Eme rson, a ppeared in favor.
Mrs. Janet Goodger , 33 58 South Emerso n , a ppeared in favor .
Mr. Leo Chapai , 3 280 South Downing , a ppeared in favo r .
Mr . Steve Gortych , 3301 South Pe nn sy lva nia , appeared in favor.
Ms . June Bre l sford , 3301 South Washington , a ppeared in favor.
Mr . Guy Bishop, 3340 South Pearl, a ppear e d in fav or.
Mrs. Mabe l Du z zutti , 1 933 South Monroe, a ppeared in favor.
The f ollowing p e ople a ppea red i n favor but were not cal l ed upon to testif y:
Mr . Duzzutti , 19 33 South Monroe .
Mrs . Chap ai , 3 280 South Downing.
Mrs. Go rtych, 3 301 South Pennsylvania.
Mr. Don F ountain , 3360 South Downing .
Mr . Arnold Ne lson, 3007 We st Stanford Drive.
Mr. Robert s . Briol a , 72 5 E . Floyd Avenue, dba Bob 's Grocery and Market,
3 2 96 South Washington Street, appeared.
Th e re we re no p ersons a ppea ring in opposition.
Upon question of Council, sixteen p ersons in the audience stood in
favor o f the granting of the 3.2 fermented ma lt beverage l icense to Bob's
Grocery a nd Marke t, a nd none stood in opposition.
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED, THAT THE PUBLIC
HEARING ON THE REQUEST OF ROBERT S. BRIOLA , DBA BOB'S GROCERY AND MARKET, 3 296
SOUT H WASHINGT ON STREET , BE CLOSED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote
resulted as f ollows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority, Kreiling, Lay, Lentsch , Senti,
Schwab .
Nays: Non
Absent: None
The Mayor declared th public hearing c losed at 10:00 P .M.
COU NCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED, THAT THE REQUEST
OF ROBERT S . BRIOLA FOH A 3.2 FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE LICENSE AT 3 296 SOUTH
I~ASHINGTON STREET BE TABLE D FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION . Upon the call of the
roll , the vote resu lted as fo llows:
Ayes: Counc i lmen Brown, Dhority, Krei l ing, Lay, Lentsch, Senti ,
Schwab .
Nays: None
Absent: None
The Ma yor declared the motion carri ed-
•••••
l i•
I
I
·' \ !
'!
I
•.
• •
'
-
•
•
-6 -
Assistant City Manager McDivitt introduced Mr. Dick Lindahl,
summer intern in the City Manager's o ffice , to City Council.
• * * • •
A p etition from property owners on West Baker Avenue prote sting a
new survey which was required by the City in order to determine center lines
of streets in Northwest Eng l ewoo d was r eceiv ed for the record.
C ity Council discussed the petition of property owners on West
Baker. At the conclusion o f the discussion, it wa s the consensus of Council
that the city a dministration f ollow through with l etters to the signers of
the p etition , as we ll as keep City Council advised .
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVE D, COUNCILMAN BROW SECONDED , THAT THE CITY
COUNC IL ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THE PETITION FROM THE PROPERTY OWNERS ON
WES T BAKER AVENUE PROTESTING THE NEW SURVEY OF STREET CENTE R LINES AND
PROPERTY LINES . Upon the call o f the roll, the vote resu lted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority , Krei ling , Lay , Lentsch, Senti,
Schw ab .
Nays : None
Absent: None
The Mayor declared the mot ion carried .
* * • • •
The minutes of the Workable Program Citizens' Committee meetings
of May 12, 1971, June 3 , 1971, a nd June 17, 1 971, were received for the
record.
• * • * *
The minute s o f the ARAPS Board of Directors meet ing of J une 1 6 ,
1971, were received for the record.
* * • * •
The minutes of the Water and Sewer Board meeting of June 15, 1971,
with a memo randum recommending the a pproval of proposed Supplement No. 2 to
Connector's Agreement with the Greenbe l t Sanitation District, were received
for the record .
Assistant City Manager McDivitt pointed out to City Council the
area described in Supplement No. 2 to the Connector's Agreement recommended
for a pprova l for inclusion in the Greenbe lt Sanitation District.
COUNCILMAN DHORITY MOVED, COUNCI LMAN BROWN SECONDED, THAT THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TO THE CONNECT OR'S
AGREEMENT TO THE GREENBE LT SANITATION DISTRICT. Upon the call o f the ro ll,
the vote resulted as fol lows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority, Krei ling, Lay , Lentsch , Senti,
Schwab .
Nays: None
Absent: None
The Mayor decl r d Lhe motion carried .
* * * * •
1
I • •
\ I
I ' '!
•
•
-7 -
A me morandum and staf f r e port from Mr . James L. Supinger, Planning
Director , dated June 2 3 , 1 9 71, to Council with regard to vacation of utility
easement in the 3 1 00 b lock between South De l a ware and South E l a ti Streets,
a long with the minu t s of the meeting of the P l anning and Zoning Commission
dated J une 22, 1 97 1, we r e received f or the record.
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDE D, T HAT T HE REC OMMENDA-
TION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION BE APPROVED AND THAT THE CITY
ATTORNEY BE DIRECTED TO PREPARE A BILL F OR AN ORDINANCE FOR CONSI DERATION
OF CITY COUNCIL WH ICH WOULD VAC ATE THE UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE 3 100 BLOCK
OF SOUT H DELAWARE AND SO UTH ELATI STREETS . Upon the ca ll of the roll, the
vote resu lted as f ollows :
Ayes: Counci lmen Brown , Dhority , Krei l ing , Lay , Lentsch , Senti,
S chwab .
Nays: Non e
Absent: No ne
Th e Mayor declared the mo tion carrie d.
* * * * *
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. 20, SERIES OF 1 9 71
AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT , TO
BE KNOWN AS SIDEWAL K IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO . 7 1; ORDERI NG THE CONSTRUCTI ON
THEREIN OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS; AND P ROVIDING FOR NOT ICE TO CONT RACTORS TO
BID UPON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMP ROVE MENTS .
(C opi e d in fu ll in the o ff icial Ord inance Book.)
City Attorney Berardini a dv ised members of Council that City
Manager Dial on June 2 8 , 1 97 1, wrote the citizens whos e property had been
deleted from Sid e wa lk I mprovement District No . 71 pursuant to the wi shes o f
Council.
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COU NCILMAN BROWN SECONDE D, T HAT ORDINANCE NO.
20, SERIES OF 1 971, BE PASSED ON FINAL READING AND PUB LISHED IN FULL IN T HE
ENGLEWOOD HERALD SENTINEL. Upon the ca ll of the ro ll, the vote resulted as
follow s :
Ay es : Councilmen Brown , Dhority , Krei l ing , Lay , Senti , Schwab.
Nays: Non
Abstain~ng : Coun c~lman Lentsch
Ab sent: Non e
The Mayor d ec l ared thP motion carr1 d .
• .., • * *
Ass1stant C1 y Mana~cr McD1v1 t stat d that the City of Eng l ewood
had rec iv d 1 tt r from Key S ving s nd Lo n dated Ju ly 2, 1 97 1, stating
that Key Sav~n gs a nd Loan had no ob )ect~on to the public wa lking through its
p ark1ng r to a b r1dg wh1ch m1ght b bui l t in th future acro ss Little
Dry C r ek to s rv s ccess to p rk t th 1nterchange o f Broa dw ay and
u .s . 2 85.
I •
\ I
~
I
•.
• •
'
-
•
•
-8 -
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO . 21, SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINA NCE VACAT ING A PORTION OF THE BROADWAY/ACOMA ALLEY , LOCATED
FROM WE ST HAMPDEN AVENUE ON THE NORTH TO LITTLE DRY CREE K ON THE SOUTH, WHIC H
PORTI ON IS WI T HIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AS RECORDED ; RETAINING AND RESERVING
AN EASEMENT FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF THE ALLEY FOR ALL UTILITIES , SURFACE AND
SU BSURF ACE STORM DRAINA GE .
(Copie d in fu ll in the officia l Ord inance Book.)
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVE D, COUNCILMAN SENTI SECON DED , T HAT ORDINANCE NO .
21, SERIES OF 1 97 1, BE PASSE D ON FINAL READING AND PUBLISHED BY TITLE IN T HE
ENGLEWOOD HERALD SENTINEL . Upon the ca ll of the ro ll, the vote r e sulted as
f oll ow s :
Schwab . Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority , Krei l ing , Lay , Lentsch , Senti ,
Nays: None
Ab sent: No n e
The Ma y or dec l ared the mo tio n carri e d.
1r • * * *
C ity Attorne y Bera rdini discussed with C ity Counci l a memorandum
directed to Mr . Stanl ey H. Dia l expressing the l egal opinion c onc e rning the
C ity's o b l igation t o enforce p ark i ng require ment s on city owne d property
aro und the C inderella City shopping center .
• • • * *
Introduced a s a Bill by Counci lman Dhority and read in fu ll,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED
IN THE DOTSON SUBDIVISION , CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , AS RECORDED.
COU NCILMAN DHORITY MOVED, COUNCI LMAN LENTSCH SECONDED , THAT THE
BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHE D IN FULL IN
THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD SENTINEL. Upon the call of the ro ll, the vote result ed
as fo llows :
Schwab. Ayes: Council men Brown, Dhor ity , Kreiling, Lay , Lentsch , Senti ,
Nays: None
Absent: Non
The May o r d cl~r d he motion carrie d •
• * • * *
A me morandum from Dir cto r of Finance Lyon concerning a federal
grant for an a l cohol mob~l e unit for the Eng l e wood Police Department was
received by C~t y Counc11.
RESOLUTION NO . 3 2 , SERIES OF 1971
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS TO THE ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
FOR AN ALCOHOL MOBILE UNIT.
(C opied in fu ll in the of fic i a l Reso lution Book .)
•.
I • •
. ,
1-
•
•
•
•
-g -
COUNC ILMAN BROWN MOVED , COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED , THAT RESOLUTION
NO. 32 , SERIES OF 1 971, BE AD OPTED AND APPROVED. Upon the call of the roll,
the vote resulted a s fo llows:
Ayes: Councilme n Brown , Dhority, Krei ling, Lay , Lentsch, Senti ,
Sch~rab .
Nays: None
Ab s ent : None
The Ma yor d e c l ared the mo tion carrie d.
* * * * *
A me mor andum from City Manager Stan l ey H. Dial concerning the
possibility o f contracting for custodia l services at the various city
buildings was receiv ed for the record.
* * 1-• *
Assistant City Manager McDivitt stated to members o f Council that
the opticon emergency tra ffic light preemp tio n device would be demon strated
Friday , Jul y 9, 1971, at 8:30A.M.
* * * * *
Mayor Sc hw ab thanked members of City Council for their participa-
tion in the KHOW Old-Timers Benefit Baseball Game .
* * * * *
COUNCILMAN LENTSCH MOVED, COUNCILMAN SENTI SECONDED, THAT THE
PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22.5-Sa(lO) OF THE CCMPRE HENSIVE
ZONING ORDINANCE , ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1 963 , ENTITLED, "PRIVATE OFF -
STREET PARKING STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE S ", BY INCREASING THE REQUIRED
OFF -STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USE S , BE REMOVED FROM THE
TABLE . Upon the call of the roll, the vote r esulted as f ollows :
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhority, Lentsch, Senti .
Nays: Councilmen Krei ling, Lay, S chwab.
Absent: None
The May or declared the mo tion c a rried.
The City Council d iscus sed the proposed ordinance.
BY AU THORITY
ORD I NAN CE NO . 22, SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPT ER 22.5-Sa(lO) OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING ORDINAN CE , ORD I NA NCE NO . 2 6 , SERIES OF 1963, ENTITLED, "PRIVATE
OFF -ST RE ET PARK ING STAN DARDS FOR RESIDENTIA L USES ", BY INCREASING T HE
REQUIRED OFF -STREET PARKING REQUIRE ME NTS F OR RESIDENTIAL USES.
(C op i ed in f ull in t h e of f i c i a l Ordin a nce Book.)
COUNC ILMAN LAY MOVE D , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDE D, T HA T ORDINANCE
NO . 22, SE RI ES OF 1971, BE PA SSED ON F INAL READING AND PUBLISHED BY TITLE IN
T HE ENGLEWOO D HERALD SENTINEL. Upon the ca ll o f the roll, the vote resulted
a s fo llo ws :
Ay e s: Counc i lmen Brown , Dhority , Lay , Lentsch , Senti , Schwab.
Nays: Councilman Krei l ing
Absent: None
The Ma yor d e cla r e d the motion carried .
•• ·' . ' \ !
'!
I
. '
• •
-
•
•
-10 -
* * * • *
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN LENTSCH SECONDED, T HAT THE
MEETING BE ADJOURNED. Upon the call of the rol l, the vote resulted as
fol lows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority , Krei l ing , Lay , Lentsch , Senti,
Schwab.
Nays : No ne
Abs e nt: None
The Mayor declared the motion carried , and the meeting adj o urned at 11:05
P .M.
,._
I • •
·' I !
' ' ~
•
]
0
•
ROLL CALL
/{J
\
•
,-..I Ill
UME NT
I J
'
~ •' \ l
I
~
I • •
• -
• •
-..
ROLL CALL
Ul ~ ~ --.c..
I I
I-
Brown T
Dh oritv
,. _)_.
~
... err
Kreilin6 'Lav ""' ....
rc.:::.;-:=-=--
>---!Senti v r-I I Schwa b ' ___.
~
h
L/' )2
.lt&-
6~1·
•
I· •
]-
~
! I
•
•
•
0
·, •
<.
ROLL CALL
Ul
><
Ul ~ .X: z
Brown 1
Ohoritv
Kreili n Ci
L av
~L.,.J.
S e n ti
Schwab
~~· -~.
'is~
. -
CITY 0 F F I C I C O UNCIL 1~ A L
f'C L. ·., c;>CU MENT
J ~!L6 '11
COU N C IL -CJTt OF E N ~~t:.ET i o 'G F ILE
EW OOD, COLO.
. . ·.,
• .
I . •
•' \ !
0
'f l
-
ROL L CALL
><
Ill !<( -I Brown
Dhor1.tv
Kreilino
Lav
-......e-L/n .I
Senti
I Schwab
•
•
• •
Ill >< !<( z
1
C.,.., OFFJC' • •-COU"C l , A L: ....,,_ UMENT
co
CITY Of c LO.
. , , .• \ I
I
"
I . •
]-
•
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
~f /'
0 F F 1 C 10 A CLUMENT N CI L O CITY C O~ ·. ,., .I
' ( 1 Jl L 6
,-ri LE
r. 0 0~. C OLO. C OU' ·~C ;:.GL E
CITY OF
( ' 1/~
~· -~r
~' If/'~ ~ teo
trf /-J -/
~ tl. ,
;' '__;}, J (/(
......
• .
I • •
. \ ! . '
]
r
I
•
•
•
ROLL CALL
~
0 u
c.l
(f)
/./I
!B rown
Dh or~tv
Kreilinq
Lay
..,_L,-.t.
Senti
Schwab
.,...-
(f)
c.l ;t
I
·y(_·f ·
~~4 -~ I
•
0
•
ICl; z
l
--'
C OL
~C Fr:
1 CuU).
();»'~~~
'--
'I
~(1 ----;Y Y'
I'-
. (
• .
I • •
\ I
I f
'!
-
•
0
5 u
~
Ul
ROLL CALL
•
• •
JUL6 '71
CO U NCIL ~·r::r Nr. FIL.If
CIT'l O F ENGLEVvOO O, COI.O .
. ,
•.
I • •
·' \ !
' 'T
f 2
-
--~
Ul
•
ROLL CALL
Br own
Dhoritv
Krei l i n q
L a_y_
Senti
Schwab
c ----
•
0
•
Ul ~~
1/ -
"""~:/ ---v ---V""" -t..--"""
t./""'
. '
•.
O FF!rl l\
CITY COL ,.. -'F"NT
Cl
CO U~!L.IL !' l -:~ t Ill
T'l' O F C GL E NOOD. CO LO.
I . •
. .
...... f . , .• I l .
"
-
•
~ u
lil
Ul
ROLL CALL
Brown
Dhority
Kre ~linq
Lay
J6:Jatr L, ,c.J,
Senti
Schwab
•
0
·, •
<.
. '
·-
j I
c L..
<.: TY c. L • '"' o. c..o~ o.
I . •
0
·. .. ·' \ r
I ' ~
•
0
•
ROLL CALL
•
At.:: Fl C I UNIE NT O F CIL ooc couN ""'To CITY rf'
'tl I I..
G ... ••
,_
I • •
f
]-
•
~
0 u
c.:l
(J)
,.. . ~·
·,
ROLL CALL
o<
Br own
Dh ority
Kreilinq
Lay
Senti
Schwab
•
• •
z
OFFICIAC
CITY CO U CIL DOCUM ENT! r I !'""'..,.
JULf> 'f 1
COU NCIL l•ol:-<.:-lG FI LE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. CO LO.
• .
I· •
.• \ I . ' ~
• . ( -
0
•
O F1=1C1 A~
CITY C ' • ' r nc-U 1E Nll
ROLL CALL
cou~·r , _, .G r-L~
ClT'i. OF Ei'<GL EWOOD. COLO.
I . •
·.
• I I I
I
,
• "
•
§
0 u
tLl
UJ
ROLL CALL
Brown
Dh oritv
Kreilina
Lav
~Li..d.
Senti
Schwab
•
• •
1:! z
OF FICI AL::
CITY CO U"!rlL rocuMEN"Il
)
Jl, 1 '£1
CO U',,;I _ !<S , l t.G ;LE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLO.
·' \ l
I
'!
. .
..
I . •
' X
,._ • 'I
•
0
• '
0 f f,_12 t ~~u~EN1l
ern' col ,J
I • ) 'll
ROLL CALL
<1: z
Brown
OhOr1tV
Kreilinq
4' Lav
~~L.
Sen ti
Schwab
•
I . .
•
.• I (
I
, . , • "
1-
•
[
~
0 u
li4
Ul
cc.
----
•
• .
0
·. •
ROLL CALL 0 F F 1 C I A L ~ COU CI L f"l ("U M NT r , ..,. "':"
J~' r, 't \
C O U ~<C I L 1 •
CIT'l.uOF ENGLiiJ ,Qv , C O LO.
li4 >< :>< ,:t
<t z
Brown I
ohoritv
Kre~lina -Lav -f:taae L; ArJ
Senti --1
Schwab -t
7
I . •
•
•
·, •
ROLL CALL
j)
-
•
Cl...., OFF• C I • '-CC L l
C CL"
C JTY OF I. Nt.l.t..
. .
·~ Nr
.. •• \ l
I
"
I . •
]
-
•
•
•
ROLL CALL
. .....
'
•
• •
,-~
(
, ..
r
. 6 '11
~ ' f II
LO .
I • •
0
• ' .. •' \ I
I '
-
ROLL CALL
•
•
• •
JUL 6 11
c ou vc,l '" ,. l , llt:;
c TY o,-L Lcwoeu. eobe.
I • •
0
. , f 2
]-
ROLL CALL
<
Brown
Dh oritv
Kreilino
Lay
&sB!"~nc.l.
Senti
Schwab
•
•
• •
(I)
>< < z
CITY c~Fr I I 1
,2CUMt::Nl'
·' 6 '11
c., J•
C ITY Co-I' •' I:..T ,J G Fl
··• (,1 I W LE; OC'll COL O.
-: J
' C2 ;'))~/) ~
J
•,
I . •
\
0
'f
• ,_
-•,
• •
ROL L CALL
Ul >< ><
< §
r I--Brown "
1-Dh o r1t v
1-Kr e 1l~_Qa
-/) La y ;:;
"---/~ .-:h .J'.. ~ ' '1 1
Sen t1 l
L Sch wab 1
I •
__, ';r-.) . /7 ~
----------------
--? ;/ ~
..;
• ~z ~,K" ~~ c'~
(' ( 'J.) .?'../ .Q
I . •
0
•
1-
•
•
• . .....
•
• -
. ,
..
I • •
•' \ ( .
" f 2
-
-
1-
1-
L
'--
•
~
0 u
til
UJ
"
./'A
ROLL CALL
Bro wn
Dh o n .tv
Kre~l~nq
Lay
Se nt~
Schwab
Ul
til >< <
• ,._
•
0
•
C Q r FICI IT'l C OU'!CJL ~A L
hL rum', ~CU''E NT
JLL 6 'i 1
C OL'~.:.... , __ _
C ITY O ' '-"' • 'i'.C PJ Ul F F".GLE"'/v,.., • >< ~c..J, c.o ... o
§
r
I • •
. , ..• \ !
I
" ' X
-
fi
0 u
"" Ul
ROLL CALL
'·
•
0
•
C'
CIT( O
I L I' I
/;/~ . :Y ' /r _t ~~ ~ -fJL
j'fY'3 s;: ~h'
},..---
)
... . . '
•
I
I I
OJ~ ){ o.
]-
/)
I I.
•
ROLL CA LL
<
Brown
Dhori6!
Kreilina
Lav
-t .I~
Senti
Schwab
•
• •
Ul >< < z
OFFICIAL
CITY. COU NCIL OCUME:NT nr-~t'""J ...,
C OU C IL t I ., -; r-il-lo
CITY OF ENGLt:WOUQ, C t>b(},
/~ ~ J _s.r;?~'
t::r/%v.Jf. r
•
I . •
.. ..• \ !
I .,.
• ,.~
. .
]
• • • ~ ..
ROLL CALL or-:-!~ I, L
l . !.1EN'ti C ITY
~ .) • 1
C OL> -J\.-IL I • -..3 I ILE
ClT:'L OF. ENGLLW OOD. COLO.
I • •
•
• -• .
• • . .
ROLL CALL
CITY t:r:
. :
D ------
I· •
0
,
,_ •
]
• • ~ ..
ROLL CALL
,I 'L f., '71
C OUNC IL M"" ITY OF E ""l rir<C rn .. E: NGL E WOOD. COL.O.
I . •
f 2
•
J-
0
•
ROLL CAL L
~ "" >< .,/'~ Cll <C
Br own ./ I"/' --Dho ri tv // ~
Kr eili n q ,......, I""/ ......... . :J.<!Y .....,./ ./ r.?;, ~ ... ~ ~~ ././ ~
S ent~ /../
Schwab .,
~) ~'t? ~
/~ <:;2/ ~/.~ ,
~ ~-/ ,
/1 ......:: ,., ....h"r.;J ,-
/0 /"~~
\ 4 ., I" ......
?-~ !' _.,...
•
f r I,."\'
CITY c c I
JUL 6 ., l
C 0 1" UL r.H.-fi"J.., ~ JL
CITY O F L'GLE:W00D, COLO.
(
/.
//)~~ cr
f<'/ '/
' I
I • •
\ l
I
,
.,.
-
)/
/
•
~
0 u
Col
(/)
ROLL CALL
p-r .
://~~I
$i_/J/
•
0
•
---
' . . .
•.
CfTY c~t f ~LC 1 A ~
' ~c~
r, f 1
(.'
I . •
.• \ (
I ' ~
• • t
•.
0
•
ROLL CALL
c. c
J
C' ( .
•
I . •
• ·. ' ' 2 I
-
•
•
•
ROLL CALL
.....,
~
0 u
"" UJ
At "T .J'
Brown
Dhon.ty
Kreilinq
Lav
~~
Senti
Schwab
•
• •
" (, !l
cou· ~:... •.t.~ ' ..:; f·I LEl
CITY 0.· C:\.GLE\ OOD, COI.Z£,
>< ~ ~
v ~--""' v .....-l--
J/ .,.-1--
l/'f_ ~
A" ....AciS:: '\
v ---~
011 7__0
rs (/ /) ~ S'/7/:? ~ i -~-7,
~~_4 ~~,
' . . '
I·
. -· . ~~~----------" __ _.··~~~~-~ ~~~~.' 2
•
-
ROLL CA LL
~ lil
Ul
Br own
Dh o r i t:,y_
Krei li1!9_
.a La_y
,/:.;,.~
v S e nt i
Schwab
•
0
•
< L._z
~ ~:::::.
J.:::::. I""" ~
~ I"
~
~
~ ~
___k:::_
OFFICIAUMEN"'I
C ITY COUNCIL DOCU
r lll"''l TO
,' L ~ '1 1
CO U' ,lf' ~.~ .,., ~ FI L E
CITY O F E GLE»OOD. C OLO.
' .
•.
I . •
,
~(c)
~
0 u
tLl
Ul
ROLL CALL
Brown
Dh oritoY_
Kreilinq
La_y
tiiliiiEG :A
Senti
Schwab
•
• •
OFFICI Ae
CITY COU CI L f'OCUMEN't'l
r·-'-'
J L :. ., 1
,.-,_ . r. c o" .. -
Cl~ OF LNvL~ -~1 ,1 r."' I~
§
• t
• .
I . .
. , f ·· I I
I
"·--~---
•
1-• .
0
•
ROLL CALL
-(J)
~ ~~ cout
Brown
r/ CIUOF ---
<..II ,,, r ILI:-
ENG\.1 OOD. coL O,.
Dh or1tv t/ v -~---
Kreilina v --Lay v ..... ----r-L:..C. l..-' ..... --Senti v .......
Schwab ..........
!:? &fl. -c1 ~' ~ I
I!}
./
~(/:/. . -------
)//~ ~J21
~ 2---
I . •
. .
f •
•
~
0 u
"" Cl)
ROLL CALL
•
• -
crn.c'6G fi crAc @
R C 1 L 1 \'<{CUMIONT'
JUL 6 '11
COU N 1
CITy OF" l·l',t"'iiNO f"l
ENQL t, vo..-!'"JJ,.fO -.'d'obo,
It
• .
I . •
. , t
• . ' -•.
• •
ROLL CALL
0 F F I CI A l~
CITY Ol. -rL DOC UM ENII . )
., I
Brown
Dh or1.ty
Kreilinq
co.J • IlLia:
TY OF LI\IGLf.WuOU, ~1-
L~
'faae-..bm_d
Sen ti
Schwab
/~·-
I . •
•
.• \ !
I ,. . ,
2
• -•,
0 -
ROLL CALL
I • •
' 2
•
•
~ u
Cil
Ul
•
• •
ROLL CALL
---------------
' . . ' . '
• .
I . •
. , '
,_ • . '
]
0
• < . '
ROL L CALL
I . •
..
• . .
• .
• •
CIT) O
ROLL CALL
& fl
Ul Ul
~
CJ ~A tLl
Ul
Brown v v v Dhoritv v
Kreilino / _;t...../
La v 1..//
~L,nc v'_,-
Sent1 -v~~-"'
Schwab -v
I . .
..
. ' •' \ !
I
'! t 2
]-
]
DIAMON DS
•
WATCHE S .JEWEL R Y
PE~SON AL.. S E RV ICE
•
• •
3 4 61 SO U TH BR OA DWAY
ENGLEWOOD , COL ORADO
J'\117 1, 1911
RAD IOS El-ECTR I CAL APPL IANCES
7 B9 ·00 3 :Z
orFJCIAC
CITY C ' ' ''OCUME N1l
I J
' !0 'fBI DGLWOOD CITY COUNCIL crrv c i.. , L
LE
:vD. COLO.
Bel Leo Lentsch 1n behalf of B1aaelf
ud ill behalf of all other penou
a1a1larl;r dhatede
IIM~ntof~of
\be State of loloradD, et.al.
CiTU AoUon J:e. 0.21255
YUh refennee to 'fOVZ ncea\ 1Dq111r;r nl&Uft to
tbe abOYe CIIJIUOM4 -t\er, \hie h to &4Yhe tut baofar u
\be 18.-a 1Jl \be oaae a-1.1111> with left \urn aoftMB\e at
Snth ::Balmoclt at u.s. 285 baTe 'beea naolft4 'b7 \be 1Dtez-
oballge installed a\ Bn\h ~o&dwq at u.s. 285, I baTe
preTioua to \hie 4&\e dinoted ., &UOI'M\7'1 lire Jolm laT1en,
11uen17 'fcnln,
/ -:{ ,J:i:<.L,
'I
D
I • •
.• \ I
' ~ f 2
• -..
0
•
ROLL CALL t:•r y (.) r:
D
;;· (j)
I • •
.. '
•
•
9 ry 0 f:" f:"
-c-:ourvc,'t..c I Jt ·,.
''r· 0 "1 ~ ·mrv .,., Ocl:l
' 0 ~ ,·I.!: .• """-'QJ'
-<,I f
€1ec;u,.;-1 r-~ o~· .... ,:_ '·.:· .
€:\q t" ·-'-':r-
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN SENTI. -V.Vo.o • "''L.tt ~~ (q
BY AUTilORITY
ORDINANCE NO. . ;_ , SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE AMENDI NG CHAPTER 22.5-5a(l0) OF THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1963,
ENTITLED, "PRIVATE OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS FOR RESI-
DENTIAL USES", BY INCREASING THE REQUIRED OFF-STREET
PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES.
WHEREAS, studies indicate that in just two decades
or twenty years, between 1950 and 1970, the number of
passenger cars in use in the United States has more than
doubled from 33 million cars to an estimated 79 million
cars; and
WHEREAS, with the continued prosperity and rising
standards of living, an even greater increase in the
number of passenger vehicles in use is to be expected
in the next two decades; and
WHEREAS, mass transit systems presently in the em-
bryo and creative stages have not come to fruition in
the Metropolitan Denver area; and
WHEREAS, from statistics provided by the United
States Government~ projected passenger car usage in the
United States in the year 1975 will have increased to
102 million cars; and
WHEREAS, in view of the extreme crisis presented
by automobile transportation in metropolitan areas; and
WHEREAS, the congestion of automobile traffic
on neighborhood and collector streets bears a direct
relationship to the public health, welfare and safety
of the citizens and residents of the City of Englewood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TilE CITY .COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1. That Chapter 22.5-Sa(lO) of the Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 26, Series of
1963, is hereby amended to read as follows:
22.5-5a. Minimum Standards
In consonance with the purpose of zoning
r egulations, as stated in this Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, "to lessen congestion in the streets",
the following are minimum standards for parking
spac e s to be maintained in connection with the
bu i ldings and uses indicated; however, nothing in
-1-
• <
·~
I . •
.• \ I
I ' '!
•
•
these standards shall be deemed to deprive the
owners or operators of said buildings or uses of
the right to maintain control over all such land
and structures or to make whatever changes they
deem appropriate for the use of such private off-
street parking space.
(10) Single-Family Dwelling •.••• Two (2)
spaces per each dwelling unit.
Two or More Family Dwellings:
Efficiency Unit ..... One (1) space
per each dwelling unit.
One or Two Bedroom Units •••.• One and
one-half (1-1/2) spaces per each
dwelling unit.
Three or More Bedroom Units .••.. Two
(2) spaces per each dwelling unit.
i· "Efficiency Unit" as used herein, shall
mean a dwelling unit consisting of one room and
including a bathroom, kitchen, hallway, closets
and dining alcove directly off of the principal
room, providing such dining alcove does not ex-
ceed 125 sq. ft. in area.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading .
on the 7th day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 16th
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the
t-l!!> day of :;;y~;_, , 1971.
(/ j
Published by title as Ordinance No. ~Ot~~----~·
Series of 1971 on the 1'1 0 day of 'f'·..J .. } , 1971.
Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
• <
•.
I • •
,
•
•
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed ()n final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. ..;(..;;.l._.., , Series
of 1971. ·
ex officio City Clerk
-3-
. (
•
I . •
·' I I
I
"
•
•
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE . NO. -· )... , . SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22.5-5a(l0) OF THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1963,
ENTITLED, "PRIVATE OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS FOR RESI-
DENTIAL USES", BY INCREASING THE REQUIRED OFF-STREET
PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES.
WHEREAS, studies indicate that in just two decades
or twenty years, between 1950 and 1970, the number of
passenger cars in use in the United States has more than
doubled from 33 million cars to an estimated 79 million
cars; and
WHEREAS, with the continued prosperity and rising
standards of living, an even greater increase in the
number of passenger vehicles in use is to be expected
in the next two decades; and
WHEREAS, mass transit .systems presently in the em-
bryo and creative stages have not come to fruition in
the. Metropolitan Denver area; and
WHEREAS, from statistics provided by the United
States Government, projected passenger car usage in the
United States in the year 1975 will have increased to
102 million cars; and
WHEREAS, in view of the extreme crisis presented
by automobile trans~ortation in metropolitan areas; and
WHEREAS, the congestion of automobile traffic
on neighborhood and collector streets bears a direct
relationship to the public health, welfare and safety
of the citizens and residents of the City of Englewood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1. That Chapter 22.5-5a(l0) of the Compre-
hens'ive Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 26, Series of
1963, is hereby amended to read as follows:
22.5-5a. Minimum Standards
In consonance with the purpose of zoning
regulations, as stated in this Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, "to lessen congestion in the streets",
the following are minimum standards for parking
spaces to be maintained in connection with the
buildings and uses indicated; however, nothing in
-1-
,_
. ' ·' ' I I
"
•.
I . •
]~
••
•
•
•
these standards shall be deemed to deprive the
owners or operators of said buildings or uses of
the right to maintain control over all such land
and structures or to make whatever changes they
deem appropriate for the use of such private off-
street parking space.
(10) Single-Family Dwelling ..••. Two (2)
spaces per each dwelling unit.
Two or More Family Dwellings:
Efficiency Unit •.••. One (1) space
per each dwelling unit.
One or Two Bedroom Units ••.•• One and
one-half (1-1/2) spaces per each
dwelling unit.
Three or More Bedroom Units •.••. Two
(2) spaces per each dwelling unit.
i· "Efficiency Unit" as used herein, shall
mean a dwelling unit consisting of one room and
including a bathroom, kitchen, hallway, closets
and dining alcove directly off of the principal
room, providing such dining alcove does not ex-
ceed 125 sq. ft. in area.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reaqing
on the 7th day of June, 1971.
Published as ~ Bill for an Ordinance on the 16th
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the t-t.t> day of S-7....:..<.-L: 1 1971.
t/ •
Published by title as Ordinance No. ~Jt~~~-----·
Series of 1971 on the 1-/ ~ day of 'iJH./'7 , 1971.
Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
. '
I . •
.• I (
I f
~
I .
•
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do he r eby c e rtify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. ~~ , Series of 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-3-
I
I
•.
I .
. '
•
0
. ·
• I
•
•
~trr of:' r:
c ou 'ct , Nell.. ...q ·o
r ·,,r-:N ~2C(]~
e-··~s .,,
€tt ou~J~.
,.. 01!' ·-1 .. ;· . ~(G'J.,;. ··I. :c
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN SENTI. '-~.V.Vo.o6 ~~l...~ ·~6! q
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. -).... , SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22.5-5a(l0) OF THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1963,
ENTITLED, "PRIVATE OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS FOR RESI-
DENTIAL USES", BY INCREASING THE REQUIRED OFF-STREET
PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES.
WHEREAS, studies indicate that in just two decades
or twenty years, between 1950 and 1970, the number of
passenger cars in use in the United States has more than
doubled from 33 million cars to an estimated 79 million
cars; and
WHEREAS, with the continued prosperity and rising
standards of living, an even greater increase in the
number of passenger vehicles in use is t be expected
in the next two decades; and
WHEREAS, mass transit systems presently in the em-
bryo and creative stages have not come to fruition in
the Metropolitan Denver area; and
WHEREAS, from statistics provided by the United
States Government, projected passenger car usage in the
United States in the year 1975 will have increased to
102 million cars; and
WHEREAS, in view of the extreme crisis presented
by automobile transportation in metropolitan areas; and
WHEREAS, the congestion of automobile traffic
on neighborhood and collector streets bears a direct
relationship to the public health, welfare and safety
of the citizens and residents of the City of Englewood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1. That Chapter 22.5-5a(l0) of the Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 26, Series of
1963, is hereby amended to read as follows:
22.5-5a. Minimum Standards
In consonance with the purpose of zoning
regulations, as stated in this Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, "to lessen congestion in the streets",
the following are minimum standards for parking
spaces to be maintained in connection with the
buildings and uses indicated; however, nothing in
-1-
. .
I . •
' .• \ l
I
~
•
•
these standards shall be deemed to deprive the
owners or operators of said buildings or uses of
the right to maintain control over all such land
and structures or to make whatever changes they
deem a ppropriate for the use of such private off-
street parking space.
(10) Single-Family Dwelling •.... Two (2)
spaces per each dwelling unit.
Two or More Family Dwellings:
Efficiency Unit .•.•. One (1) space
per each dwelling unit.
One or Two Bedroom Units ....• One and
one-half (1-1/2) spaces per each
dwelling unit.
Three or More Bedroom Units •..•. Two
(2) spaces per each dwelling unit.
i· "Efficiency Unit" as used herein, shall
mean a dwelling unit consisting of one room and
including a bathroom, kitchen, hallway, closets
and dining alcove directly off of the principal
room, providing such dining alcove does not ex-
ceed 125 sq. ft. in area.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading
on the 7th day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 16th
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the
t· e5 day of fT--J~; , 1971.
Published by title as Ordinance No. ~~~~~-----·
Series of 1971 on the 1-/ 0 day of 'Juj<) , 1971.
Mayor
Attes t:
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
,._
. ,
' '
I .
..
•
'
....... •
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. ~~ , Series
of 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-3-
d
'
•
I .
' '
•
lc::::;a-
•
crr.-r c9,0"!c:~ c 1 A L:
n r:Tu /;1 ~gcuMEN11
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN
'!"I I 'll
A BILL FOR c o· :w·r· ··-· CITY CF .,.N r ·.-.·.-:. <G ILE
•
"' c;.u ::wooo
AN ORDI NANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT .CoLa
LOCATED IN THE DOTSON SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, AS
RECORDED.
WHEREAS, there presently exists a utility easement
located in the Dotson Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Englewood has heretofore recommended that the major portion
of said utility easement hereinafter described be vacated; and
WHEREAS, all the land adjoining said utility easement is
contained within the City of Englewood, Colorado.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT 0 nAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COl p.OOO, as follows:
Section 1. That the following described utility ease-
ment, located within the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado, be and the same is hereby vacated to-wit:
A sixteen-foot (16') utility easement running
north and south through the center of the Dotson
Subdivision, which subdivision is bounded on the
north by West Dartmouth Avenue, on the east by
South Delaware Street, on the south by West East-
man Avenue and on the west by South Elati Street;
except, however, the southerly twenty-five feet
(25') of said easement which is to be used by the
Utilities Department of the City of Englewood or by
any licensee or holder of a franchise from the City
for the maintenance of the manhole for a sewer line
serving the Bishop School, and also, for the main-
tenance of existing facilities of the Public Ser-
vice Company -Electric Division.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on
the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the ;Ill 1'1-~
day of ~cJ"jf , 1971.
Mayor
Attest:
ex o ffic io City Clerk
I , Ste phen A. Lyon, do h e reby certify that the above and
-1-
..
I • •
,
2X
]~
•
•
•
foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill
for an Ordinance, introduced , read in full and passed on
first reading on the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
. '
~
I
I· •
f
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN _______ _.....•·_·'-.'-'ll
A BILL FOR Cot: J·-,. ··-
CITy CF ~N ··:,-· ·'-'G FILii
" C.LEwooo
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE UTIU'I'Y EASEMENT 'COLa.
LOCATED IN THE DOTSON SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. AS
RECORDED.
WHEREAS, there presently exists a uti~y easement
located in the Dotson Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Englewood has heretofore recommended Lhat the major portion
of said utility easement hereinafter described be vacated; and
WHEREAS, all the land adjoining ·said UL!l~ty easement is
contained within the City of Englewood, tnlorado.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED B.Y .THE Cll'Y COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as .£o.llows::
Section 1. That the following described utility ease-
ment, located within the City of Englew~, Arapahoe County,
Golorado, be and the same is hereby vacated to-wit:
A sixteen-foot (16') utility easement running
north and south through the center of the Dotson
Subdivision, which subdivision~s hounded on the
north by West Dartmouth Avenue, .on .the east by
South Delaware Street, on the ·south ~y MEat East-
man Avenue and on the west by ~outh Ela.ti Street;
except, however, the southerly LwenLy-five feet
(25') of said easement which is to be used by the
Utilities Department of the City of Englewood or by
any licensee or holder of a franchise from the City
for the maintenance of the manhole for a sewer line
serving the Bishop School, and also, for the main-
tenance of existing facilities of the Public Ser-
vice Company -Electric Division.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on
the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the -.f 1'/-~
day of )/:dff" , 1971.
Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and
-1-
,
• •
,
•
•
foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill
for an Ordinance, introduced , read in full and passed on
first reading on the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
\ I
I
~
. '
•
I . •
0
'
•
Cl,_ .OFF! CIA ' .... COUNCil l: I ~!:Tun"":--1 ~~CUMENT,
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCIU1AN -------__:...·'-'''...;';._-'7J
CITY CF L . ~. _---~:.';G FILE A BILL FOR C O!: n• .,. ·
•
NGLE W OO
AN ORDINANCE VACATlNG A PORTlON OF THE UTlLlTY EASEMENT
0
' COLa
LOCATED IN THE DOTSON SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, AS
RECORDED.
WHEREAS, there presently exists a utility easement
located in the Dotson Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Englewood ha• heretofore recommended that the maJor portion
of •aid utilitY easement hereinafter de•cribed be vacated; and
WHEREAS, all the land adjoining said utility easement is
contained within the City of Englewood, Colorado.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, coLORADO, as follows;
Section_h. That the following desc~ibed utility ease-
ment, located within the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado, be and the same is hereby vacated to-wit;
A sixteen-foot (16') utility easement running
north and south through the center of the Dotson
Subdivision, which subdivision is bounded on the
north by West Dartmouth Avenue, on the east by
South Delaware Street, on the south by West East-
man Avenue and on the west by South Elati Street;
except, however, the southerly twenty-five feet
(25') of said easement which is to be used by the
Utilities Department of the City of Englewood or by
any licensee or holder of a franchise from the City
for the maintenance of the manhole for a sewer line
serving the Bishop School, and also, for the main-
tenance of existing facilities of the Public Ser-
vice Company -Electric Division.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on
the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971.
Publtohed "' a Bill for an Ordinance on the f. tj
day of )JdT _, 1971.
Mayor
Attest;
ex officio CitY Clerk
1, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and
-1-
'
• .
I . •
' \ 1
' ,.
..
•
•
foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill
for an Ordinance, introduced , read in full and passed on
first reading on the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
. '
• .
I . •
. ' '
-
•
•
y: .,.: 'I-:.._: ';
C!TY C~!J . · '· .~
h1-1L,,,, , .J .'i'
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN LAY.
COU; 'C IL ! .. ~~ ,,,,.., F iL L:;
.C a:.:! OE ENGLE WOOD, CoLO.
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. ~ / SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE BROADWAY/ACOMA
ALLEY, LOCATED FROM WEST HAMPDEN AVENUE ON THE NORTH
TO LITTLE DRY CREEK ON THE SOUTH, WHICH PORTION IS
WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AS RECORDED; RETAINING
AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF THE
ALLEY FOR ALL UTILITIES, SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE STORM
DRAINAGE.
WHEREAS, there presently exists a public alley lying
between West Hampden Avenue on the north and Little Dry
Creek on the south, known as the Broadway/Acoma Alley; and
WHEREAS, Key Savings and Loan Association has
agreed to construct a pedestrian walkway to be dedicated
to public use as access to the park land south of Dry
Creek in lieu of said alley; and
WHEREAS, a parking lot layout and landscaping plan
of said Key Savings and Loan Association will be con-
tingent upon approval by the City of Englewood Planning
and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the City of Englewood has heretofore recommended that
said alley hereinafter described be vacated; and
WHEREAS, all af the land adjoining said alley is
contained within the City of Englewood, Colorado and
does not constitute a boundary line between the City of
Englewood and any county or other municipality; and
WHEREAS, should said alley be vacated, no land
adjoining said alley shall be without an established
public road connecting said land with another estab-
lished public road •
. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Se ction 1. That the following de scribed alley
loc a t e d within the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado be and the same is hereby vacated; to-wit:
All of that portion of the Broadway/Acoma
Alley, located from West Hampden Avenue on the
north to Little Dry Creek on the south, which
portion is all within the City of Englewood,
Arapahoe County, Colorado.
-1-
. ,
•.
I . •
'
l-
•
•
Section 2. Provided, however, that the City of
Englewood shall retain and shall reserve the right to
install, maintain, operate, repair and replace by it-
self or by any licensee or holder of a franchise from
the City, any poles, wires, pipes, conduits, sewer
mains and water mains or any other utility now located
in the alley or any portion thereof vacated by this
ordinance. And provided further, that the City of Engle-
wood hereby reserves the right to install and maintain
in that portion of the vacated alley, surface and sub-
surface storm drainage facilities.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first
reading on the 21st day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 23rd
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the t ~ day of )t........s-FY, , 1971.
Published by title a~ Ordinance No. ~/ ,
Series of 1971 on the d !!> day of O.w-=-~---------:-1971.
7;1-d
Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. ~/ , Series
of 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
,_
•
I . •
,
•
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COI.JNCILMAN LAY
CITY O F' F' I C I " COU!~ :lL no L'
I ·. UiiiJ T o CU,MENlJ
JUL •J '11
BY AllrHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. ~' SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN U!PROVEHENT DISTRICT, TO
BE Y-NOI& AS SIDEWALK IMPROVEHENT DISTRICT NO; 71; ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION ,
THEREIN OF SIDEWALK lHPROVEHENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS TO
BID UPON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH H!PROVEHENTS.
~~EREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, pursuant
to the Charter and Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1964, of said City and the Laws
of the State of Colorado, hereby fi · ls and determines that there exists a neces-
sity for the creation of Sidewalk ltuprovement District No. 71, in said City,
and the construction therein of sidewalk improvements, as described herein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore directed the Director of
Public Works to prepare plans, ~~!cations, maps and schedules in accordance
with said laws; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has .prepared all the maps and
certificates of his survey, as well as schedules, plans, specifications,
approximations of cost, and all other matters and things in complete form
and substance as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the said maps and certificates of his survey, as well as
schedules, plans, specifications, app~oximations of cost, and all other
matters are hereby approved and adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing conc.erning the creation of the
District and the construction of the improvements therein and upon this
ordinance has been published once a week for three weeks in the Englewood
Herald, a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and, in addition, a
copy of the Notice has been mailed, postage prepaid, to each known owner of
real property within the proposed District; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place specified in said Notice, the.City
Council met in open session for the purpose of hearing any objections or
protests that might be made against said improvements; and
WHEREAS, all objections and complaints having been duly heard and
considered, the Council has determined that such objections should be denied
except as this ordinance has accepted them and incorporated ht :ein changes
in said District based upon said objections.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71 is hereby created
and the improvements hereinafter described, consisting of certain sidewalk
improvements, are duly ordered after Notice duly given and Hearing duly held,
all as required by law.
Section 2. The extent of the District to be assessed .for the cost
of the improvements shall be all the real property specially benefited and as
more particularly set forth in the Notice of Hearing as provided by a Reso-
lution of the City Council passed and adopted on the 17th day of May, 1971.
Tie kind of improvements and the sidewalks on which such improvements shall
be as follows:
Necessary installations, removal and replacement of concrete
sidewalks, curb and gutter,. together with .the appurtenances
and incidentals, in the City's right-of-way contiguous to the
following proper ties:
Location
1200 East Dartmou th 1-4
46-51
23-26
16
16
lO
Subdivision
Evanston Broadway Addition 2nd
Filing
Evanston Broadway Addition 2nd
Filtns
W.H. Betts 1st Addition to
rv:t nc,.nn
I • •
•' \ !
'
,
'r
. I
•
Location
3200 ·South Delaware
3100 South Fox
Lots
l-13
13-24
l-12
12-22
l-12
Block
l
2
l
l
•
Subdivision
Park Addition 2nd Filing
Park Addition 2nd Filing
S.G. Hamlins Broadway
Addition
Corder Subdivision
Uhlman Subdivision
Two unplatted pieces of property, as follows:
Beginning at a point on North line of Oxford Street which is 489 feet
west and 50 feet north of SE corner of NE l/4 of SE l/4 Section 4-5-68,
thence W 133 feet along N line of Oxford Street; thence North 162 feet,
thence East 133 feet; thence South 162 feet to beginning; except North
35 feet Section 4-5-68 (955 West Oxford).
Beginning 489 feet West and 177 feet North of SE corner of NE l/4 of
SE l/4 of Section 4-5-68; thence North 35 feet;'thence West 133 feet,
thence South 35 feet; thence East 133 feet to beginning.
Section 3. Said District shall be kn~.l as the same is hereby desig-
nated "Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71," in Englewood, Colorado.
Section 4. The construction of said sidewalk improvements in and
for said District, as shown by the plans, specifications and maps thereof,
prepared by the Director of Public Works and approved by the City Council of
the City .of Englewood and now on file in the office of the Director of Public
Works, be and the same is hereby authorized and ordered, the material to be
used with such maps, plans and specifications.
Section 5. The estimated total cost of said improvements is $8,624.001
it is proposed that the City of Englewood will pay approximately $1,327.00 to-
ward the total cost of said improvements. The balance of the total probable cost
(being approximately $7,297.00) is to be paid by special assessments to be
levied upon each parcel of the real property hereinabove described. The approxi-
mate share of the total cost to be assessed per front foot upon any lot or tract
of land fronting or abutting on said improvements is set forth in the Notice of
Hearing, as provided by a Resolution adopted and passed by t~~ City Council on
the 17th day of May, and is:
Vertical curb and gutter
4" curbwalk type I
6" curbwalk type I
Sidewalk (4" thick)
Driveway (6" thick)
Crosspan (6" thick-wire
Removal of old vertical
Removal of old curbwalk
Removal of old sidewalks
Removal of old crosspan
Saw concrete
Concrete steps
mesh)
curb and gutter
$4.88 per lin. ft.
6.38 per lin.· ft.
7.13 per lin. ft.
1.28 per sq. ft.
1.65 per sq. ft.
2.03 per sq. ft.
1.88 per lin. ft.
2.25 per lin. ft.
0.38 per sq. ft.
0.53 per sq. ft.
3.75 per lin. ft.
7.88 per step ft.
Section 6. All assessments levied against the aforesaid parcels of
real property will be due and payable, without demand, within thirty days froa
and after the final publications of an ordinance assessing the costs of said
improvements against the real property in the d istrfct. ln case any owner of
real property shall fail to pay the whole of such assessment against his .
property within said thirty days, then the pro rata cost of said improvements
-2 -
.• . , \ !
!
I
• I
• .
• •
f
-
. )
•
•
so assessed against his property, together with interest at the rate of six
per cent (6X) per annum on any unpaid balance, shall be payable in five equal
annual installments. The first of such installments of principal and interest
shall be due and payable at such time as may be determined in and by the
assessing ordinance, and the remainder of said installments shall be due and
payable successively on the same day of each year thereafter, until all are
paid in full.
Section 7. The Mayor and Director of Finance are hereby authorized
to advertise for bids to construct such improvements in three (3) consecutive
weekly issues of a newspaper of general circulation, which advertisements may
run concurrently with the publication of this Ordinance.
Section 8. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the
improvements proposed to be constructed and installed will confer a special
benefit upon the property within the District and a general bene.fit upon the
City as a whole.
Section 9. All ordinances, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith .
are hereby repealed. This Ordinance, after . its final passage, shall be recorded
in a book kept for that purpose, shall be authenticated by the signatures of
the Mayor and Director of Finance, shall be published in said City.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on the 2l•t
day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 23rd day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the ~v~~---day of sr~~4h . 1971. ~
the
Published by title as Ordinance No. .~('
H t!J day of Sf'..LS..L'y , 1971.
, Series of 1971, on
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ex officio City Clerk
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and complete copy of an Ordinance, passed on final reading
and published in full as Ordinance No. ~. Series of 1971.
' ex officio City Clerk
-·3 -
• <
•.
I • •
•
. , '
-
•
•
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COONCILMAN LAY JUU.> '11
BY Alll'HORITY COU NC IL 1\i .• _.. •
CITy OF £NGL EL:. n. JG FILS
£Wooo.coLu ORDINANCE NO. ~' SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN IMPROVEHENT DISTRICT, TO
BE KNOI>'N AS SIDEI-IALK U!PROVEHENT DISTRICT NO; 71; ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREIN OF SIDEWALK U!PROVD!ENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS TO
BID UPON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH U!PROVEHENTS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, pursuant
to the Charter and Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1964, of said City and the Laws
of the State of Colorado, hereby finds and determines that there exists a neces-
sity for the creation of Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71, in said City,
and the construction therein of sidewalk improvements, as described herein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore directed the Director of
Public Works to prepare plans, specifications, maps and schedules in accordance
with said laws; and
WHE.REAS, the Director of Public Works has . prepared all the maps and
certificates of his survey, as well as schedules, plans, specifications,
approximations of cost, and all other matters and things in complete form
and substance as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the said maps and certificates of his survey, as well as
schedules, plans, specifications, app~oximations of cost, and all other
matters are hereby approved and adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing concerning the creation of the
District and the construction of the improvements therein and upon this
ordinance has been published once a week for three weeks in the Englewood
Herald, a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and, in addition, a
copy of the Notice has been mailed, postage prepaid, to each known owner of
real property within the proposed District; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place specified in said Notice, the.City
Council met in open session for the purpose of hearing any objections or
protests that might be made against said improvements; and
WHEREAS, all objections and complaints having been duly heard and
considered, the Council has determined that such objections should be denied
except as this ordinance has accepted · them and incorporated ht :ein changes
in said District based upon said objections.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71 is hereby created
and the improvements hereinafter described, consisting of certain sidewalk
improvements, are duly ordered after Notice duly given and Hearing duly held,
all as required by law.
Section 2. The extent of the District to be assessed -for the cost
of the improvements shall be all the real property specially benefited and aa
more particularly set forth in the Notice of Hearing as provided by a Reso-
lu~ion of the City Council passed and adopted on the 17th day of May, 1971.
Tie kind of improvements and the sidewalks on which such improvements shall
be as follows: ·
Necessary installations, removal and replacement of concrete
sidewalks, curb and gutter,.together with .the appurtenances
and incidentals, in the City's right-of-way contiguous to the
following properties:
~tJ2.n. 12!..!. Block Subdivision
1200 East Dartmouth 1-4 16 Evanston Broadway Addition 2nd
Filing
46-51 16 Evanston Broadway Addition 2nd
Filing
23-26 lO W.H. Bett!l 1st Addition to
o I
I • •
f
•
Location
3200 ·South Delaware
3100 South Fox
Lots
1-13
13-24
1-12
12-22
1-12
Block
1
2
1
1
•
Subdivision
Park Addition 2nd Filinq
Park Addition 2nd Fi1inq
S.G. Hamlins ~roadway
Addition
Corder Subdivision
Uhlman Subdivision
Two unplatted pieces of property, as follows:
Beginning at a point on North line of Oxford Street which is 489 feet
west and 50 feet north of SE corner of NE 1/4 of SE ~/4 Section 4-5-68J
thence W 133 feet along N line of Oxford Street ; thence North 162 feet,
thence East 133 feet; thence South 162 feet to beginning; except North
35 feet Section 4-5-68 (955 West Oxford).
Beginning 489 feet West and 177 feet North of SE ~orner of NE 1/4 of
SE 1/4 of Section 4-5-68; thence North 35 feet;"xhence West 133 feet;
thence South 35 feet; thence East 133 feet to b~gi~.
Section 3. Said District shall be known as xhe same is hereby desig-
nated "Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71," in Engl.ewooa, r:o:l.:cnu:lo.
Section 4. The construction of · said sidewalk~vements in and
for said District, as shown by the plans, specifications :ana~ thereof,
prepared by the Director of Public Works and approved ~ythe City Council of
the City.of Englewood and now on file in the office .of~he Itirector of Public
Works, be and the same is hereby authorized and orderea, the :lllirt.e%"ial to be
used with such maps, plans and specifications.
Section 5. The estimated total cost of said -~rovements is $8,624.001
it is proposed that the City of Englewood will pay approximately $1.327.00 to-
ward the total cost of said improvements. The b31 ance m the total probable cost
(being approximately $7,297.00) is to be paid by spec.iiil. assessments to be
levied upon each parcel of the real property hereinabove desc.ribed. The approxi-
mate share of the total cost to be assessed per front fo.at u_pcn any lot or tract
of land fronting or abutting on said improvements is ~ ~orth in the Notice of
Hearing, as provided by a Resolution adopted and passed by t~~ City Council on
the 17th day of May, and is:
Vertical curb and qut ter
4" curbwalk type I
6" curbwalk type I
Sidewalk (4" thick)
Driveway (6" thick)
Crosspan (6" thick-wire mesh)
Removal of old vert ical curb and gutter
Removal of old curbwalk
Removal of old sidewalks
Removal of old crosspan
Saw concrete
Concrete steps
$4 ."88 pe.r lin. ft.
6.JB _pe.r lin. ft.
· 7 .I3 per lin. ft.
~.28 pe.r sq. ft.
~.65 per sq. ft.
2.03 per Bq. ft.
1.88 per lin. ft.
2.25 per lin. ft.
0.38 per sq. ft.
0.53 pe.r sq. ft.
3.75 per lin. ft.
7.88 per step ft.
Section 6. All assessments levied against the aforesaid parcels of
real property will be due and payable , without demand, within thirty days froa
and after the fina l publications of an ordina nce assessinq the costs of said
improvements against the real property in the distrfct. "In case any owner of
real property shall fail to p a y the whole of such assessment against his .
property within said thirty days, then the pro rata cost of said improvemehts
-2 -
' I
•.
I • •
f
-
•
•
so assessed against his property, together with 1nteres:t at the rate of six
per cent (6%) per annum on any unpaid balance, shall be payable in five equal
annual installments. The first of such installments of principal and interest
shall be due and payable at such time as may be determined in and by the
asses s ing ordinance, and the remainder of said installments shall be due and
payable successively on the same day of each year theTeafLer, until all are
paid in full.
Section 7. The Mayor and Director of Finance are hereby authorized
to advertise for bids to construct such improvements in .three (3) consecutive
weekly issues of a newspaper of general circulation, which ~dvertisements may ·
run concurrently with the publication of this Ordinance.
Section 8. The City Council hereby finds and ~~termines that the
improvements proposed to be constructed and installed will ~ a special
benefit upon the property within the District and a g~eLal bene!ft upon the
City as a whole.
Section 9. All ordinances, or parts thereof, :bl .conflict herewith .
are hereby repealed. This Ordinance, after _ its final -passage, .shall be recorded
in a book kept for that purpose, shall be authenticated by ±he ~ignatures of
the Mayor and Director of Finance, shall be published .in ~aid~-
Introduced, read in full and passed on firstxeading on the 21st
d3y of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the :2lrana~ ~ ~une. 1971.
~~ Read by title and passed on final reading :on :the _,:=c:r_-__ day of
Cf..A..A..t-;r , 1971. -~
Published by title as Ordinance No. .~(1 ., :seriEs ~ 1971. on
the H lj, day of CY-<-<-f<-t , 1971.
T '
MAYOR
ATTESTt
ex officio City Clerk
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and complete copy of an Ordinance, passed on final reading
and published in full as Ordinance No. ~, Series of 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-·3 -
,._
''
I • •
·' \ l
'!'
,
•
•
0
•
u '11
RESOLUTION NO. ·32_ SERIES 0,~1 ~71 ·-·-···-t..:TI'i ~
J _._ OF: E:t •GL -' ""f', ' :::.waco. c
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS TO THE ENGLEWOOD POLICE
DEPARTMENT FOR AN ALCOHOL MOBILE UNIT.
WHEREAS, The Englewood Police Department has received a federal
grant approval under the Highway Traffic Safety Administration for $4,920.00
to purchase an alcohol mobile unit,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section l. The following financial transaction Is hereby authorized:
Increase In Revenue Estimate
General Fund, Miscellaneous Income $4,920.00
Appropriation of Funds
Pollee Department, Capital Outlay $ 4, 920.00
Section 2. The City Manager and Director of Finance are hereby
authorized and directed to make the above changes to the 1971 appropriations
of the City of Englewood, Colorado. ·
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this ~ ~ day of ~u .?,-, , 1971.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Ex Officio City Clerk
~~
/V t/.R-..L
/f,t:: -I
pt r/P_ I
YYL<./;)~ -I
(!L,--7 -/
~-/
I, Stephen A. Lyon, ex officio City Clerk of the City of Englewood,
Sate of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Is a true,
accurate, and complete copy of Resolution No. ~. Series of 1971.
Ex Officio City Clerk
''
•.
I • •
1 r
I .,.
-
'
•
•
AGENDA FOR
REGULAR COUNCIL SES SION
JULY 6, 1971
8:00 P.M . Call to order, invocation by Msgr. Bernard Cullen of the St. Louis
Catholi c Church, pledge of allegiance led by Boy Scout Troop ~o.
154., and roll call. Clly coG F I c 1 A
,_
'NrJ•_ Do l
I. Minutes . 'ro cu,.,E:N-r
(a) Regular meeting of June 21, 1971 . (Copies trans-
mitt d h e r ewith.)
2 . Pre-sC'h eduled citizens a nd visitors.
(a) Recognition of ·•special guests" of th e Council.
(b) Mr . Harold Rust, Englewood Manager of th Public
Service Company, will be present to present the
fran c hise ch ck.
(c) Mr. J . F. DeVivier, former chairman of the Board
of Career Service Commissioners, will be present
to receive a plaque from the Council r ecognizing
his long standing service to the City.
(d) Mr. Les H.w• will be present to requ est a renewal
of 3. 2 beer license for Sport Bowl, 3295 S. Broadway.
3. Public hearings.
(a) To consider amendment of Zoning Ordinan ce to in-
crease residential parking requirements. (Copies
<'f some information previously transmitted to the
Council is enclosed.)
(b) To consider the request of Mr. Robert S. Briola dba
Bob's Grocery and Market, 3296 South Washington
Street, to s cure a 3. 2 % fe r m e nted m.1l t beverage
li cense.
4.. Communicati ons .
(a) Petitions fr om prop r owners on West Baker Avenue
protesting new survt.>\ b) the Ctty whi ch was required
in order to dete •·mine nt r lines of streets in North-
west Englewood.
(b) Minutes of th e Wo th.able Progr m Citizens' Committee
m ee ing of M ay 12, 1971. (Copies transmitted here-
with .)
(c) Minutes of th e Workable Program Citi zens' Committee
meeting of June 3, 1971. (CopiPS transmitt d h ere-
with .)
(d) Minutes of the Workabl Program iti zens' Committee
meeting of June 17 , 1971 . (Copies transmitted h ere-
with .)
(e) l\1inut s of the ARAPS Board of Directors meeting of
June lG , 1!)71. (Copit.!b trans mitted herewi th.)
(Coni inued)
•.
I • •
'
-
•
•
AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCIL SESSION
JULY 6, 1971
Page 2
4. Communications. (Continued)
/
/
5.
(f) Minutes of the Water and Sewe r Board meeting of
June 15, 1971. (Copies transmitted h erewith.)
(g)
(l) Memorandum recommending the approval
of proposed Supplement No. 2 to Connector's
Agreement with the Greenbelt Sanitation
District.
Memorandum and staff report from Mr. James
L. Supinger, Planning Director, dated June 23,
1971, to Council with regard to vacation of ut ility
easement in the 3100 block between South Del aware
and South Elati Streets. (Copies of memo, staff
report, and minutes of the meeting of the Planning
and Zoning Commission of June 22, 1971 transmitted
herewith. Bill for an ordinance to be ready for
Council meeting.)
City Attorney.
(a) Ordinance on final reading establishing Sidewalk
Improvement District No. 71 . (Copies previously
transmitted.)
(b) Ordinance on final reading vacating a porti on of
the Broadway-Acom a Alley , located from West
Hampden Avenue on the north to Little Dry Creek
on th South.
(c) Memorandum from the City Attorney to Mr. Sta nley
H. Dial, City Manager, stating the City's obligation
to enforce parking requirement on City -owned
property around Cinderella City Shopping Center.
(Copies transmitted herewith.)
(d) Attorney 's boice .
6. City Manager .
(a)
(b)
Resolution appropriatmg fund s to Police Departme nt
for an alcohol mobil unit. (Memorandum from Stephen
A. Lyon, Di t·ector of Finance, and copy of resolution
appropriating fund lo Police Dept. transmitted herewith.)
Memorandum from the City Manager, Stanley H . Di al ,
concerning the possibility of contracting for Custodial
Services at t.h various City buildings. (Copies trans-
mitted herewith.)
7. R ecognition of non-scheduled c itizens and visitors.
Gcn ral dl cuss! n.
(a) Mayot·' choic
(b) Coun ilman's c hoice.
9. Ad journm e nt.
---.£-' (' j;,l
STA LEY II . IJIAL.
City Manager
SliD mm
I • •
\
' ' '!
-
•
•
' TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR ..JL I 7
REGULAH CO NCIL SESSION Co uN
JULY 6, 1971 CIJ:t OF CIL '"• 1/IJG _
£NGl£woo ~'ll £
0, C OlQ.
.00 P .M. .Jll t o ordu·. invocation b l\1sgr . Betnard Cullen of th e St. uis
C tho li e Chur h, pledge of a lI glance led b Boy Scout Troop No .
1 5 4, and roll call .
1. Minute .
(a) R <'~u l a r meeting o f June 21, l97l. (C op1es trans-
mitted herewith .)
2 . Pr c-sl'h~!dul d itizens nd vis itorb .
(a) R cognition o f "spt><'ia l guests" o f the Counc il .
(b) Mr. Harold Rust, Englewood 1\1 nagCL ol the Public
S rvice Company , will be present to present th e
franchise check.
' ... \ '""/
(r) Mr .,], F. DeV ivi .r , form er r:halrman nt the Board
o f Caree r Service Commissioner , will be pr sent
to receive a pl aqu e from th e Council recogn izing
hi s lo n g standing service to th City .
3 . Pub! ic h ea rings .
(a) To con s id r amend ment of Z oning Ordinance to in-
cr ase residential parking requlr m nts. (Copies
of som information previously tran smitted to the
Council is encl osed. including a mem or andum fr om
the Planning a nd Z oning Comm i ss ion recommending
a n in cr ase in residen tial parking r·equirements, a
staff report to the Pl ann ing and Z on ing Commiss ion
o n th same subject, and minutes ol tne Pl anning
a nd Z oning omm i sion meetin gs ot Ma 4 a nd May
1 • 19 7 1.)
QJ To com:.id 'L' the reque;st o t Mr . R obert S. Briola elb a
Bob' Gro e t· • and Market. 3296 South Washington
Strt·L·t, to s cure a 3. l fe rmented m a l t beverage
li cen ·e .
t . 'mnmuni atiun
(a) P etitions {rom Jl'upt'rtv <' :~-ners u n W<: t Baker Av euu
prot sti n g new survey I.Jy th City which was required
in ord r to incl ude West Bak •r Avenue in Paving Di -
trlct u . 20 . (Copies transmitted h rewith .)
OJ) 1lnwr.lndum (rom the Parks and Rcct· atiun Com-
mlbsion t•ecommending poli cy [or naming of parks
and oth<.e r Ct'e.!tlonal (a c llitlcs . (Copies predous ly
transmitted .)
(•'/ Minute, uf th Wurk.lul • Progr m 'itiz.l!n ' Committee
tn etlng ol tay 12. 1971. ( opil'b tt·msmitted here-
~lUI.)
(til linutt·, o [ th Wo t'lu tbl<.• Program ~itiz.l'Db 1 mmitte<.~
tnl'l tm~ ol Junl.' 3 , HJ71. (Copies tL .msm itted her -
with .)
(L) l\1lnuteb of the Workabl • Program It! Len ' 'ommittec
m •<.•ttngoiJun 17,197 1. ( oplc ·ttansmltted h ere-
"''Ut . I
(I) Mlnut.l•b o t the RAPS Bo.1Ld o( Dit' ctors meeting of
Junl' lh, 1!171. ('upil ·han mith.J h rL•wlth.)
(l o ntlnu ·J)
,._
•.
I • •
,
-
•
•
TENTATIVE AGENDA FOR REG LAR COUNCIL SESSION
JULY 6, 19 7 1
Page 2
4. Communications . (Continu ed)
(g) Minutes of the Water and Se wer Board m eeting of
June 15, 1971. (Copies transmitted h erewith.)
(1) Memorandum recommending the approval
o f proposed Supplement No. 2 to Connector's
Agreem e nt Sewer Contract No. 3 .
(h) Me morandum and staff report from Mr. James
L. Suplnger, Planning Director, dated June 23,
1971, to Council with regard to vacation of utility
easement In the 3100 block between South Delaware
and South Elati streets. (Copies transmitted here-
with.) (Also transmitted herewith copies of an
e xce rpt from the minutes of the meeting of the
Planning and Zoning Commission of June 22 , 1971.)
5. City Atterney .
(a) Memeramlum frem the City Atterney te Mr. Stanley
H. Di a l, City Manager, stating the City's obligation
to enforce parking requlrementron City-owned
property around Cinderella City Shopping Center .
(Copies transmitted herewith.)
(b) Ordinance on final reading on Sidewalk bnprovement
Distri c t No. 71. (Copies previously t ransmitted.)
(c) Attorney's choice.
7. Recognition of non-scheduled citizens and visitors .
General discussion.
(a) Mayor's choi ce .
(b) Co un ilman's c hoic
9. Adjournment.
STANLE Y H. DIAL
City Manager
SHD /ij
•.
0
I • •
'
•
-
TO: All Members of the Englewood City Council
FROM: Mr. Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
O FFIC IAl CITY C OU'\1.--Ir --~"''"'CU /.'E NT
.j
COU NCI L r ·-r:.-DATE: June 28, 1971 C[IX •L-•lN G F IL E
. 01: ENGLEWOOD, COLO .
SUBJECT: POSSIBILITY OF CONTRACTING FOR CUSTODIAL SERVICES
AT THE CITY HALL AND LIBRARY, POLICE BUILDING,
AND PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDINGS
Mr. Stephen A. Lyon, Director of Finance, has researched the posslblllty
of contracting the custodial service at the above buildings in keeping with
y our request made during a budget hearing late last year. The figures re-
cited are probable costs if contract services were obtained from several
private firms, but are not contract quotations.
Based on his research, and my own observations, I would recommend that
we maintain our present "in house" custodial service at all of the buildings
mentioned.
City Hall and Library Building:
If we were to contract for custodial service at the City Hall and Library,
It would probably cost a minimum of $25, 900 and a maximum of $34, 300,
depending upon the firm employed and whether one or one and one-half
man years would be required for "special services." "Special services"
would include such items as securing the building after 10:00 p.m. (this
service Is not economical to contract for after 10:00 p.m.), odd jobs,
Including special clean-ups and room set-ups for meetings.
Our present costs for custodial service are $30, 200, not counting over-
time which is budgeted at $2, 000. Assuming we only needed to retain
one full time employee for "special services," the least we could contract
our custodial services for would be $25,900, or a possible savings of
$4, 300. The m aximum would probably be $30, 900, or a possible savings
of only $700.
In view of the questionable economies involved, and the very real possi-
bility of not maintaining th e quality of work our present staff renders, I
recommend th at we not contract custodial service at the City Hall and
Library.
Police Building:
Present custodial service for the Pollee Building costs approximately
$7,500 per year. It might be possible to contract for this service for
$3,700, or a savings of $3,800. As with the City Hall and Library, we
would again have to make provision for special services. In addition to
(Continued)
---------·------
I
•
-
All Membe rs of the Englewood City Council
June 28, 1971
Page 2
the "special services" listed above, our present custodian performs
numerous other odd jobs which would not be considered a part of any con-
tract service. For example, he regularly cleans and disinfects the in-
terior of all police vehicles. This, of course, is in addition to the regu-
lar wash jobs received at the Servicenter.
Perhaps the most telling argument against contracting for service in the
Pollee Building Is that we will soon be moving Into our new Police-Fire-
Center, and at this point, I would definitely recommend against cleaning
this building on contract.
Parks and Recreation Buildings:
Present custodial service for the Denny Mlller Building aDd the Duncan
Building costs approximately $6,600 per year. These services include
special repairs to the buildings, but more importantly control over access
to the inventory at the Denny Miller Building. This Inventory ranges
from $6,000 to $10,000, depending on the time of the year. Cost of con-
tracting for custodial s e rvice alooe ranges from $2, 200 to $3, 300. Be-
cause of the control requirement over this large Inventory, It Is recom-
mended that we again not contract for custodial services.
Re spectfully ,
SHD/Ij
A tt.
,. .
\
I
'
-
•
REGULAR MEETING:
•
COUNCI L CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENG LEWOOD, COlORADO
JUNE 21, 1971
,I ... f l
The City Counci l of the City o f Eng l e wood, Arapahoe Cou nty, Colora do,
met in regular session on June 21, 19 71, at 8:00 P .M.
Mayor Schwab, presiding , ca lled the me eting to order.
The invocation was given by Mayo r Schwab . Pledge of allegiance was
l e d by Boy Scout Troop No. 1 54.
The Mayor asked f or roll call. Upon the call of the roll, the
fo llowing were p resent :
Councilmen Brown, Dh ority, Kreiling, Lay , Senti, Schwab .
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declare d a quorum present.
Also present were: City Manager Dia l
City Attorney Berardini
City Clerk Lyon
* * * * *
CO UNCILMAN DH ORITY MOVED, COUNCILMAN LAY SECO NDED, THAT THE MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 7, 1971, BE AP PROVED AS READ. Upon the call
of the roll, the vote resulted as f ollows :
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhority, Kr ei ling , Lay , Sent i , Schwab.
Nays: No ne
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* • • * •
Mr . James L . Girardot, President , Englewood Liquors , Inc ., 3434
South Broadw ay , a ppeared before City Council and requested Council's
approval o f the transfer of the stock of Englewood Liquors , Inc., to James L .
Gi rardot , Hugh D. Marsha ll, Mary Lou Girardot, a nd Golda B. Marshall from
Mr . and Mrs . Cl arence Duran.
COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVED , COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED , THAT THE TRANS-
FER OF STOCK OF ENGLEWOOD LIQUORS, INC ., TO JAMES L . GIRARDOT , HUGH D.
'<:ARSHALL, MARY LOU GIRARDOT , AND GOLDA B. MARSHALL BE APPROVED . Upon the
call of the roll , the vote resulted as fol lows :
Ayes: Co uncilmen Brown , Dhority , Krei l ing, Lay , Senti , Schwab .
Nays: None
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
• * * * •
'l'he minul;es of the Board of C reer Service C ~ission ers m eting
of June 17, 1971, were received for the record.
• • • • •
•.
I • •
,
--•
-2 -
A memorandum relaying the Planning Commission's recommendation to
rezone Lot 6 except the west 145 feet thereof and Lot 7, Centennial
Industrial Park Subdiv~sion from I -1 (Light Industrial) to R-3-A (Multiple
Fami ly Residential) was received for the record.
COUNCILMAN SENI'I MOVED , COUNCILMAN BROON SECONDED, THAT T HE CITY
COUNCI L ACCEPT THE MEMORANDUM RELATING TO THE PLANNING COMMISS ION'S
RECOMMENDATION TO REZONE LOT 6, EXCEPT THE WEST 14 5 FEET, AND LOT 7 OF
CENTENNIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION TO MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENI'IAL AND
THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE ESTABLISHED FOR JULY 1 9 , 1971, AT 8:00 P.M . Upon
the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhority, Kreiling, Lay, Senti , Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor d ec lared the motion carried.
* * * * *
A memorandum relaying the Planning Commission's recommendation of
the amendment o f the Zoning Ordinance repealing Section 22.5-3 (f), relating
to the locations of service stations , was received for the record.
COUNCILMAN SENI'I MOVED, COUNCILMAN BROON SECONDED, THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ACCEPT T HE MEMORANDUM OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING REPEAL
OF SECTION 22.5-3(f ) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO SERVICE STATIONS .
Upon the call of the r oll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhority, Krei l ing , Lay , Senti, Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* • * .. *
The minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of
June 16, 1971, with a memorandum recommending the purchase of certain
rights-of-way a long C ity Di ch at the base of Bates-Logan Park, were
received f or the record.
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNC ILMAN DHORITY SECON DED, THAT THE CITY
ADMINISTRATION BE AUTHORIZED TO PROCE ED WITH THE PURCHASE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY
ALONG CITY DITCH AS OUTLINED IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION AT A PRICE NOT TO EXCEED THE APPRAISED VALUE PLUS
TEN PER CENT (10%). Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , DhoriLy, Krei l ing , Lay, Senti, Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carr~ed.
* * * • *
The minutes of the Library Board me eting of June 15, 1971, were
received for th record.
* * ... *
, ,
•.
I • •
' r
'!'
t 2X
•
•
-3 -
The fin ancia l r e port for the mon t h of May , 1 9 71, wa s received for
t he record.
* * * * *
T h e r ev i s ed S 1dewa lk I mprove ment Di s trict No . 71 Schedul e wa s
r e c e ive d for the r ecord .
COUNC ILMA N LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN SENTI SECO ND ED, THAT THE CO NSIDERA-
TION OF S I DEWALK IMP ROVE MENT DISTRICT NO . 71 BE RE MO VED FROM T HE TABLE. Upon
the c a ll o f the roll , the v o te r es ulted as follow s :
Ay es : Counc ilme n Brown. Dh ority , Kre iling , La y , Senti , Sc hw ab .
Nays: None
Absent: Counc ilma n Lone
The Ma yor d e cla r e d t h e mo t i o n c arr ied .
COUNC I LMAN LAY MOVE D , COUNCl LMA N DH ORITY SECO NDED , THAT T HE 3900
AND 4000 BLOCKS OF SO UTH J ASON AND T HE 39 00 , 4000, 4 100 AND 4200 BLOCKS OF
SOUT H INCA BE RE MOVE D FROM SIDEWALK IM PROVEME NT DISTRICT NO . 71.
Counci lman Krei l ing reque ste d tha t C 1ty Manage r Dial address l etters
to the p roperty owners in the area deleted from the District informing them
of the deletion a nd, further , quoting the pric es f o r priva t e concrete work
being cha rge d prope rty owne rs in other parts o f the city. Mr. Krei ling
further requested that C ity Manag e r Dial s tate in his l etter that the area
is in need o f s idewa lk r e construction and tha t the r e con s truction will cost
more in future y ear s .
Upon the ca ll of t h e roll , the vote r e sulte d as fol lows :
Ay e s : Counc i lmen Brown , Dhority , Kr e iling, Lay , Senti, Schwab.
Nays: None
Ab s ent : Counc ilman Lone
The Mayor declare d t h e motion c arr ied.
Mr . Leo na td Koldeway , 40 35 Sout h J a son, and Mr. Ron Ty l er , 402 5
S outh Jason, a ppear ed before C ity Coun cil and r e que sted c larification
concern1ng the pr ivate work o n c o ncret e and the thickness of the s idewa l k
slabs a nd dr t veway s , resp ec ive l y .
* * * * *
Introduced as a B1 ll by Counct lman Dh ortty a nd re ad i n f ull,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINAN~l REPEALING SUBSECTION (f) OF SECTION 3 , C HA PT ER 22.5 ,
COMP RE HE NSIVE ZONING ORDI AN CE , ORDINANCE NO . 2 6 , SE RIES OF 1 963, C I T Y OF
ENGLE WOOD , BY RE~l OVl NG THE RESTRICTION PROHIBITING F ILLING STAT IONS TO BE
PLACED WI THIN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET AN EXISTING FILLING STAT I ON PROP ERTY
LINE OR WITHIN FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET Of' THE ENTRANCE TO A SCHOOL BUILDI NG
OR PLAYGROUND .
COUNCILMAN DHORITY MOVI:.D , COUNCILMAN SENTI SECON DED, THAT T HE
PROPOSED BILL FOR AN.9RDl~E BE PASSED 0 FIRST REA DING AND PUBLIS HED IN
FULL IN THI:. ENGLEWOO~~s\tm·r'NEL AJ\1) THAT A PUBLIC HEAR ING BE ESTABLIS HE D
FOR JULY 1 9 , 1 7 1 , AT 8:00 P .M. Upon th c 11 of th roll, the vote res ul ted
as fo U :ow s:
Ayes: Co unc tlmen Brown, Dh o rit y , Kt ei lLng, La y , Sent i , S chwab .
Nays: None
Absent: Co unct lman Lon
•.
I • •
\ r
I
,
'r
]
•
•
- 4 -
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
----------*~--!.._!_* --1ntroduced as a Bi ll by Councilman Senti and read in fu ll,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE REZONING Lar 6 , EXCEPT THE WEST 145 FEET THEREOF , AND
LOT 7, CENI'ENNIAL INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COUNI'Y OF
ARAPAHOE, S'rATE OF COLORAD O, FROM I-1 DISTRICT (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) TO R-3 -A
DISTRICT (MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL). Upon the cal l of the roll, the vote
resulted as follows:
~~ COUNCILMAN SENTI MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED , THAT THE
• "-PROPOSED BILL FOR AN ,Q~,I,..~NCE ..,BEr f.~~SE.,O 0~ FJ~!, REf'P,~NG ~ND !'Jl~LI_?~ ,!-~, ~~ ,_l, ~
•
FULL IN THE ENGLEWOO{).;'SENTINEL. Upon the~'call of the roll,fthe vote resulted _:! ./, , . .,
as follows: / '
~
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority, Kreiling , Lay, Senti , Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent : Counci lman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * *
Introduced as a Bill by Councilman Lay and read in full ,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE BROADWAY/ACOMA ALLEY,
LOCATED FROM WEST HAMPDEN AVENUE ON THE NORTH TO LITTLE DRY CREEK ON THE
SOUTH , WHICH PORTION IS WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AS RECORDED; RETAINING
AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF THE ALLEY FOR ALL UTILITIES ,
SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE STORM DRAINAGE .
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED , THAT THE PROPOSED
BILL FOR AN OB9.INA~~ BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHE D IN FULL IN
THE ENGLEWOOD•~f:~"!NEL .
City Manager Dia l stated tha~ as yet a written commitment had
not been received from Key Savings and Loan to provide access to a park
area at the Broadway-u .s. 285 interchange . Mr. Dial stated that the
State Highway Department had budgeted monies during the coming fiscal year
for improvement of the area into a park.
City Attorney Berardini stated that prior to fina l reading the
City would receive the wr~tten commitment from Key Savings and Loan.
Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Councilm n Brown , Dhority, Krei ling, Lay , Senti , Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Counci lman Lone
The Mayor d clared th mot~on carr~ed.
• • * • •
City Attorney Berardini st ted to City Council th t th
Co lumbu s request for a c l ub liquor l icense at 3800 South Santa F
be con s ~dered by City Council at th June 21, 1971, meeting •
Knights of
Lane should
• I
•.
I • •
1-
•
•
-5 -
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED , THAT THE CON -
SIDERATION OF THE KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS APPLICATION F OR A CLUB LIQUO R LICENSE
BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE . Upon the ca ll of the ro ll, the vote r e sulted as
fo llows :
Ay es : Counci lmen Brown , Dhority , Krei ling , Lay, Senti , Schwab .
Nay s: No ne
Absent: Councilman Lone
The May or declared the motion carried.
Councilman Kreiling s tated t h a t he wished the minutes to r ef l ect
that no testimony in opposition to the g ranting of the license had been
r eceiv e d by C ity Counc i l.
COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVE D, COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDE D, THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL GRANT THE LIQUOR LICENSE OF THE KNIGHTS OF COLUMB US, SUBJECT TO
WRITTEN NOTIFICATION OF T HE CO NFORMANCE OF LOCAT ION TO ALL APPLICABLE CODES
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . Upon the call o f the roll, the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhority, Kreiling, Lay, Senti, Schwab .
Nays: None
Ab s ent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor decla red the motion carried.
* • * • *
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN SENTI SECONDED, THAT SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO . 71 BE IMPLEMENTED WITH THE FOLLOWING BLOCKS DELE TED:
3900, 4000, 4100 AND 4200 BLOCKS OF SOUTH INCA AND 3900 AND 4000 BLOCKS OF
SOU TH JASON. Upon the call of the ro ll, the vote resulted as f ollows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dh ority , Krei ling, Lay , Senti, S chwab.
Nays: No ne
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayo r dec l a r ed the motion carried .
Int roduced as a Bi ll by Counc i lman Lay a nd read in fu ll,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT , TO
BE KNOWN AS SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 7 1; ORDERING THE CO NSTRUC TION
THEREIN OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO CONT RAC TORS TO
BID UPON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS .
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN SENTI SECONDED , THAT THE PROPOSED
BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHED IN FULL IN THE
ENGLE WOOD SENTINEL . Upon the ca ll o f the ro ll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Cou ncilmen Brown, Dhority , Krei l ing , Lay , Senti , Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Councilman Lone
Th May or d c l ar d th mo tion carried.
,_
I • •
'
-
•
•
-6 -
RESO LUTI ON NO . 30 , SERIES OF 1 9 71
A RES OLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE CITY 'S SHARE OF CONSTRUC -
TION COSTS IN SIDEWALK IMPROVE MENT DISTRICTS,
(C opied in f ull in the officia l Reso lution Book.)
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN SENTI SECONDED , THAT RESOLUTION NO .
30 , SERIES OF 1971, BE ADOPTED AND APPROVED . Upon the ca ll of the roll, the
vote resu l ted as fo llows:
Ayes: Councilm n Brown , Dhority, Kreiling, Lay , Senti, Schwab.
Nays: None
Ab sent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor d ec l a red the motion carried.
* • * * *
RESOLUTION NO. 3 1, SERIES OF 1971
A RESOLUTION MAKING APPROPRIATIONS TO THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT AND
CITY AT TO RNEY'S OFFICE IN THE GENERA L FUND.
(Copied in fu ll in the official Reso lution Book .)
COUNCILMAN DH ORITY MOVED, COUNC ILMAN BR OWN SECONDE D, THAT RES OLU -
TION NO. 3 1, SERIES OF 1 9 71, BE ADO PT ED AND APPROVED .
C1 y Co unc 1l discussed the appointment of a ud itors for the year
1 971.
Mayor Schwab requ e sted the Council Aud1 Committee o f Mr. Kreiling
and Mr . Dh or ity t o make a report at the n e x t City Council meeting concerning
a ppo intmen of auditors for 1 97 1 .
Upon the c all of the ro ll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ay s: Councilmen Brown , Dhor1ty, Krei ling , Lay , Senti , S chwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Coun 1 lman Lone
T he Mayor dec l a red the mo 10n ca rried.
• • • • *
C ity Manager D1a l reported that h e and Counci lman Krei ling had
recently a ttend d a me t1ng w1th representat1ves of the Urban Drainage
Dis trict and o her ovet·nm nta l jurisdictions within Lhe s outh metropol itan
a rea. Mr . Dia l s a d that upon p assage of the necessary docume nts to cause
the City of Eng l ewood to be e lig ible for flood insurance , Council had com-
m1 tted to f lood pl a1n zon1n g 1n the area o f the 100 year f lood . Mr . Di a l
stated that Mr. J m s u1nn of the Urba n Drainage D1strict was a dvocating
that the area of the P l att R1ve r from Eng l ewood s ou h to Chatfield
Reservo1r rec 1ve f l ood pla1n zoning in th area which had been flooded
during 1965 . Mr. D1a l s ated that th1s a rea 1s mu ch greater than the 100
year flood pla1n and pr e~en ed a map c ompar1ng the 1 00 year flood pla1n
with th ar ~ f looded 1n 1 9 5.
Councilman Kr 1 l 1ng stated that upon comp l et1on of Chatfield
Reservo ir lt was propos d that th area c ould b r e zoned to its normal
zon 1ng . Mr. Kr 1 l 1ng a l s o sta ed that th proposed flood pla in zoning
woul d not p rohibit building b ut it would r qu i re tha t a ll building in the
area so zon ed hav c rtain f lood protection feat ures .
'I
•
I • •
.· \ !
' ' .,.
-
•
•
-7 -
City Council discussed the proposition of the Urban Drainage
District.
City Manager Dial stated that he and Councilman Kreiling would
c ontinue to attend the various meetings concerning f lood plain zoning and
keep Counc il informed .
* * • * *
City Manager Dial informed City Counci l hat the requested increase
in federa l aid for recon struction of the sewage treatment plant had been
a pproved by the Environmenta l Protection Agency .
* * * * *
City Manager Dial stated that the State Highway Department had
forwarded to the City of En g lewood the c ontract for TOP ICS activities for
the year 1 971-1972 (state fisca l year) of approximately $30 ,000. The
program includes the signalization at the intersection of Bannoc k /Oxford,
Quincy/Logan , Dartmouth/Downing, and Downing/Hampden. Mr . Dial stated
that the signalization would include connection of these intersections
to the monitrol system and the installation of opticon e mergency preemption
devices .
COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVED , COUNCI LMAN SENT I SECONDED , THAT T HE
PROPOSED TOPICS (TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL PROGRAM TO IMPROVE CAPACITY AND SAFETY )
CONT RAC T BE APPROVED AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO
EXECUTE THE CONTRACT DOCUMEN TS . Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted
as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhority, Kreiling, Lay , Senti , Schwab .
Nays : None
Absent: Councilman Lone
The May o r declared the mo tio n carried.
* * * * *
City Manager DLa l stated that th Depar ment of T ransportation had
forwarded a c o ntract for x cu ion by the C ~ y Manag r f or the receiving of
grant money for th purcn. of bus for th Englewood -Littleton-Fort Logan
bus lLn •
CITY
T
LI TTLE
Ay
. y :
Absent: Cou ~1 Lo
The Mayor d c l a r d th mo 10. car r1ed .
AUT HORIZED TO ENTER
THE DEPARTME OF
f"' H t:~LEWOOD -
vo rl!sul ed
• Lay , n 1, chwab •
C1ty Ma nag r Dia l stated tha accordLng to the revised timetable
for the bus p urchases, b~ds would be op ned on th new buses on August 4,
1971.
* * •• *
• t
•.
I • •
I I
I
'!
•
•
-8 -
City Manager Dia l discussed cer tain prob lems encountered in obtaining
architectural services for en l a rgement o f the Servicenter by a ddition of a
p aint bay estimated at $30 ,000 . Mr . Dial stated that in light of these prob-
lems he would like the City Council to consider a neg otia ted contract with
Rob Roy, the contractor who had previous l y c onstructed the Servicent er .
After discussion, it was the consensus of Council that the City
Manager proceed with the obtaining of an a rchitect to design the work o n the
Servicenter .
* .. * * •
City Manager Dial s tated that a meeting on the Englewood-Littleton
Bus Committee would be he l d on Jun e 2 8 , 1971, at 10:30 A.M., a t City Hall,
to discuss with the City and County of Denver a proposal for suburban b u s
line service by the Denver T ramway.
* * * * *
Mayor Schwab invited me mbers of C ity Council to participate in an
Eng lewood Old-Timers Association s oftba ll game with the KHOW softball team
on July l, 1971, at 8:00 P .M.
* * * * *
City Counci l received a l etter of r e signa tion from City Councilman
Dick Lone.
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN SENTI SECONDED, T HAT THE LETTER
OF RESIGNATION FROM CITY COUNCILMAN DICK LONE BE ACCEPTED AS OF JUNE 21,
1971. Upon the call of the roll, the vote re s ulted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhority, Kreiling, La y, Senti, Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * *
Councilman Brown int roduced Mr . Eddie Tanguma, 4389 South S h e rman
S treet, who is a member of the Engl ewood Animal Control Bo ard.
Mr. Brown discus sed briefly the activities of the Animal Control
Board and stated tha t the recommendations of the An imal Cont rol Board would
be forthcoming at C ity Co unci l.
• * * * *
Counci lman Kreiling reported that he and Councilman Brown had
mea sured a number of vehic l es after the June 7 , 197 1, C ity Council meeting
and had found that a ll p icku p s , campers , and vans were over 5 -1/2 feet in
height.
* * * * *
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCI LMAN DH ORITY SECONDED , THAT THE MEETING
BE ADJOURNED . Upon the call o f the roll, the vote resulted as fo llows:
Ayes : Counc i lmen Brown, Dhority , Kreiling , Lay , Sen ti , Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carried , and the meeting adjourned a t 9:4 5 P .M.
~.~
I • •
• I
.• I (
I ' 'T
J-
•
REGULAR MEETING:
•
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COWRADO
JUNE 21, 1971
O FF ICIAL
CITY CO U Kl '-DOC UMENl'l
I' lJ ~N TO
J~ll 6 '11
C OU NCIL r .. c~ o I JG FI LE
CITY: OF ENGLEWOOD, COLO.
OFFICIAL
CITY C O U~r~. r ~ruMENT "SPECIAL CITIZEN PROGRAM INVITEES, July 6, 1971" ~
,
)
CO I' L , , FI LE
CIT'( OF LI';GLEWCOD, COLO.
Preci n c t No. -Mr. and Mr s . Ray C. Reed, 2449 South Raritan Street
Preci nc t No. 2 -Mr. and Mr s . Oscar Lohoff, 3124 South Delaware Street
Prec in c t No. 3 -Mr. and Mr s . George G. Dordill, 2895 South Sherman Street
Pr ecinc t No . 4 -Mr. and Mr s . Joseph G. Budini ch, 3858 South Galapago Street
Preci nct No. 5 -Mr . and Mr s . John B. Lough, 1177 Ea s t Amherst Avenue
Preci nct No . 6 -Mr. and Mr s . Owen W. Johnson, 1425 East Bate s Avenue
Precinct o . 7 -Mr . and Mr s . Harold R. Wakfield, 2268 Ea s t Floyd Place
Precinc t No . -Mr. and Mrs . Phill i p Nipper, 3585 South Marion Street
Precinct No . 9 -Mr. and Mr s . James Slowi ns ki, 3915 South Grant Street
Precinct No . 10 -Mr. and Mr s . George Martin, 4175 South Fox Street
Pre ci nct No . 11 -Mr. and Mr s . Au g u st Bogenhagen, 4330 South Pennsylvania Street
Precinct No . 12 -Mr. and Mr s . A. J . Reinhardt, 4620 South Bannock Street
Precinct No . 13 -Mr. and Mr s . Max R. Madrid, 3061 We s t Bellewood Drive
Pre cinct No. 14 -Mr. and Mr s . Kenneth A. Ma y , 5086 South Acoma Street
Precin t No. 15 -Mr. and Mr Cha rle s D. Walk er , 4700 South Bannock Street
Precinct No . 16 -Mr. and Mr s . Thomas C. Uri h , 4660 South Wa shington Street
•.
I •
·' \ l ' ~--~------------._~;--~------=2
. .
•
0
• ,_
. '
0
•
O FF l <l A L
CITY C:OU ~ "rU MENT "SPE CiAL CITIZEN PROGRAM iNVITEES , July 6, 1971" -' '
J
C OU ' , f tLE
CITY OF E l\i GL EWOOD. C OLO.
Pr ecinct No . - Mr. and Mr s . Ray C. Reed, 2449 South Ra ritan Street
Pre ci nct No. 2 -~l r. and Mr s . Osc ar Lohoff, 3124 South Delawar e Street
Prec inct No. 3 -Mr. and Mr George G. Dordill, 2895 So uth Sherman Street
Precinct No . 4 -Mr. and Mr s . Jo eph G. Budinich, 3858 South Galapago Street
Precinct No . 5 -Mr . and Mr s . John B. Lough, 1177 East Amherst Avenue
Preci nct No . 6 -Mr. and Mr s . Owen W. John son, 1425 Ea st Bate s Avenue
Preci nct No . -Mr. and Mr s . Harold R. Wakfield, 2268 East Floyd Place
Precinct No. 8 -Mr. and Mr s . Phillip Nipper, 3585 South Marlon Street
Pre c inct No. 9 -Mr. and Mr s . Jame s Slowin s ki, 3915 So uth Grant Street
Precinct No . 10 -Mr. and Mr s . G org Hartin, 41 7 5 South Fox Street
Preci nct No . 11 -Mr. and Mr s . Au g u st Bogenhagen, 4330 South Pe nn sy lvania Street
Precin ct No. 12 -Hr. and Mr s . A. J . Reinhardt, 4620 South Bannock Street
Precinct No. 13 -Mr. and Mr s . Max R. Madrid, 3061 We st Bellewood Dr ive
Preci nct No. 14 -Mr. and Mr s . Kenneth A. Ha y , 5086 So u th Acoma Street
Pr eci nct No. 15 -Mr. and Mr Char l es D. Walk r, 4 700 So uth Bannock Street
Precinct No . 16 -Mr. and Mr s . Thomas C. Uri h , 4660 South Wa s hington Street
I • •
. ' \ !
I ' • '!
-
--
•
•
•
•
• •
I
OFF I -IAL
CITY c-~ ·r::c:UMENll
.'J L , f 1
C O U t ~Cil ;,''--' 1c <G FILE r CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, CQQI,
~solemnly swear /'(sa al!fizat) that ~ will faithfully
execute ~the Office of Councilmanl\of the City of Englewood,
Colorado,.\ and will~~ to the best of ~ ability;1 preserve,
protect and defend Athe Constitutio~and Statute~of the State
of Colorado
11
and the Charter and Ordinances
11
of the City of
Englewood f., and the Constitution of the United States of America,(.
. .
• .
I • •
. , f
0
•
OrFICIA L
TO: All Members of the Englewood City Council
FROM: Mr. Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
DATE: July 2, 1971
CITY cour • r ncu~1 EN1l
r.
SUBJECT: COMING EVENTS CALENDAR
COU. ,-.;JL ·•-~T,C\;G F ILE
MONDAY, JULY 5, 1971. City Hall offices and Library wi\!lJt4t OF E G LEWO O D , COLO.
closed account legal holiday (Independence Day holiday on Sunday,
July 4th.)
MONDAY, JULY 5, 1971. Dedication of Centennial Park and
Spencer Field at 6:30 P.M.
TUESDAY, JULY 6, 1971-REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. This
Is due to observance of Independence Day hoUday on Monday, July
5th.
FRIDAY, JULY 9, 1971. Demonstration of Optlco~~~:.~quipment for
emergency vehicles. Details will follow later. ~-4 0 '·' • ,,. •
MONDAY, JULY 19, 1971-REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING.
NOON, FRIDAY, JULY 23, 1971, THROUGH NOON, SUNDAY, JULY
25, 1971-COUNCIL RETREAT. Details will follow later.
MONDAY, AUGUST 2, 1971. City Hall offices 8Dd Library will be
closed account legal holiday (Colorado Day).
TUESDA~AUGUST 3, 1971-REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING. 'Ibis
is due to servance of Colorado Day holiday on MODday, August 2nd.
Respectfully,
__ c::::-=--" -~ //~~
•
STANLEY H. DIAL
City Manager
SHD/mm
•
I
'
•
REGULAR MEETING :
•
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, CO lORAD O
JUNE 21, 1971
OFFICIAL
CITY CO U 'Jr l'_ 110C UM EN'1l
I 11 I T0
. f 1
C OU ',~,L .G FI LE
CITY. OF ENGLEW OOD, CO LO.
The City Council of the City of Eng lewood, Arapahoe County , Colora do,
met in regular session on June 21, 1 97 1, a t 8:00 P .M.
Mayor Schwab, pres iding, ca lled the meeting to order.
Th e invoc ation was given by Mayor Schw ab . Pl edge of allegiance was
l ed by Boy Scout Troop No. 154.
The Mayor asked for roll call. Upon the call of the roll, the
fo llowing we r e present:
Councilmen Brown , Dhority, Kreiling, Lay , Senti, Schwab.
Absent : Counc i lman Lone
The Mayor declared a quorum present.
Also pre sent were : City Manager Dial
City Attorney Berardini
City Clerk Lyon
* * • * *
COUNCILMAN DHORITY MOVED, COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED, THAT THE MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 7, 1971, BE APPROVED AS READ. Upon the call
of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhority, Kreiling, Lay, Senti, Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* • • • •
Mr . James L. Girardot, President, Englewood Liquors, Inc., 3434
South Broadway , a ppeared before City Council and requested Council's
approval o f the transfer of the stock of Englewood Liquors, Inc., to James L .
Girardot, Hugh D. Marsha ll, Mary Lou Girardot, and Golda B. Marshall from
Mr . and Mrs . Cl a rence Duran.
COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVED , COUNCI LMAN LAY SECO NDED, THAT THE TRANS -
FER OF STOCK OF ENGLEWOOD LIQUORS , INC ., TO JAMES L . GIRARDOT , HUGH D.
MARSHALL , MARY LOU GIRA RDOT , AND GO LDA B. MARSHALL BE APPROVED . Upon the
ca ll of the roll, the vote res ult e d as fol lows :
Ayes: Councilm n Brown , Dhority , Krei ling, Lay , Senti , Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Counc i lman Lone
The Mayor dec l ared th mo tio n carr~ed .
• * • * •
Th minu~es of th Board of Career Service Ca.missioners meeting
of June 1 7 , 1971 , w re received for the record .
• * * * •
,_
•.
I • •
f
•
-2 -
A memorandum rel ayir•g the P lanning Co11111i ss ion' s recommendation to
rezone Lot 6 except the west 14 5 feet thereo f and Lot 7, Centennial
Industria l Park Subd ivisio n from I -1 (Light Industrial) to R-3-A (Multiple
F am i ly Resid entia l) was received fo r the record.
COUNCILMAN SENTI MOVE D, COUNCILMAN BRCMN SECONDED , THAT T HE CITY
COUNC IL ACCEPT THE ME MORANDUM RELATING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S
RECOMMENDATION TO REZONE LOT 6 , EXCEPT THE WEST 145 FEET, AND LOT 7 OF
CENTENNIAL INDUS TRIAL PARK SUBDIV ISION TO MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND
THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE EST ABLISHED FOR JULY 19, 1971, AT 8:00 P .M. Upon
the call o f the ro ll, the vote resulted a s follows:
Ay es : Co unci lmen Brown, Dhority, Krei ling, Lay, Senti, Schwab .
Nays : None
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * *
A memorandum relaying the Planning Commission's recommendation of
the amendment of the Zoning Ordinance repealing Section 22.5-3(f), relating
to the locations of service stations , was received f or the record.
COUNCILMAN SENTI MOVED , COUNCILMAN BRCMN SECONDED , THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ACCEPT THE MEMORANDUM OF THE PLANNING COMMISS ION RECOMMENDING REPEAL
OF SECTION 22.5-3(f) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE RELATING TO SERVICE STATIONS ,
Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as fol lows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority , Kreiling , Lay, Senti, Schwab.
Nays: None
Abs e nt: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * *
The mLnut es of the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of
June 1 6 , 1971, with a memorandum r ecommending the purchase bf certain
rights-of-way a long City Ditch at the base of Bates-Logan Park , were
received for the record.
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED , THAT THE CITY
ADMINIS T RATION BE AUTHORIZED TO PROCEED WITH THE PURCHASE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY
ALONG C ITY DITCH AS OUTLINED IN THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSI ON AT A PRICE NOT TO EXCEED THE APPRAISED VALUE PLUS
TEN PER CENT (10%). Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: C ounci lm ~n Brown, DhoriLy , Krei l ulg , Lay , Senti , Schwab.
Nays: Non
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared Lhe mo tion carried.
* • * * *
The m1nut s of t h Library Board meeting of June 15, 1971, were
received f or the r cord .
* * ... *
. .
•
f ••
I • •
. ' ·' \ I
I ' f
1
1
•
•
-3 -
The finan c ia l re port for the month of May, 1 9 71, was received for
the record.
* * * * *
T he r e vised S1dewa l k I mprovement District No. 71 Sche dule was
rec e ive d for the r ecord.
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , CO UNCILMAN SENTI SECONDE D, THAT THE CONSIDERA-
TION OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO . 71 BE REMOVED FROM THE TAB LE. Upon
the call o f the ro ll, the vote resu l ted as f ollows:
Ayes : Counci lmen Brown , Dh or ity , Krei l ing , La y , Senti , Schwab.
Nay s: None
Absent: Counci lman Lone
The Mayor declared the mo tion carried .
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCI LMAN DHORITY SECONDED , T HAT T HE 3 900
AND 4000 BLOCKS OF SOUT H JASON AND T HE 3900, 4000, 4100 AND 4200 BLOCKS OF
SO UT H IN CA BE REMOVED FROM SIDEWALK IM P ROVEME NT DISTRICT NO. 7 1.
Counci lman Kr ei l1ng requested that City Ma nager Dia l address l etters
t o the prope rty owners in the a r ea deleted from the District informing them
of the delet i o n and , further , quoting the prices f or private concrete work
being charged property owners in other parts of the city. Mr. Krei ling
further reque sted that City Ma nager Dial state in his l etter that the area
i s in need o f sidewa lk reconstruction and tha t the r e con s truction will cost
more in future yea r s.
Upon the call o f the ro ll, the vote resulted as fo llows :
Ay e s: Counci lme n Brown, Dhority , Kr eil ing, Lay , Senti, Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Counci lman Lon e
The Mayor d ec lared the mot ion carried.
Mr. Leo n a rd Kolde way , 4035 South Jason, and Mr. Ron Ty l er , 4025
South Jason, a ppeared before C ity Co unci l and requested clarification
concerning the p riv a te work on c o ncrete and the thickness of the sidewa l k
s l abs a n d dr1veways , r e s p ec tive ly.
* * * * *
Introduced as a B1 ll by Counci lman Dh ority and rea d in fu ll,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SUB SECT ION (f) OF SECTION 3 , C HAPTER 22.5 ,
COMP REHEN SIVE ZONING ORD INANCE, ORDINANCE NO . 2 6 , SE RIES OF 1 963 , CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD , BY REMOVING THE REST RICTION PROHIBITING FILLING STATIONS TO BE
PLACED WITHIN FIVE HUNDRED (5 00) FEET OF AN EXISTING FILLING STATION PROPE RTY
LINE OR WITHl FIVE HU DRED (500 ) FEET OF 'r HE ENTRANCE TO A SC HOOL BUILDING
OR PLAYGROUND .
COU ILMAN DHORITY MOVED , COUNCILMAN SENTI SECON DED , THAT T HE
PROPOSED BILL FOR AN ORDI NANCE BE PASSE D ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHED IN
FULL IN THE E GLEWOOD SENTINE L AND THAT A PUB LIC HEARING BE ES TABLISHED
FOR JULY 1 9 , l 7 1 , AT 8 :00 P .M. Upon th ca ll o f the ro ll, the vote resulted
as f ollows:
Ayes: Counc1 lmen Brown , Dhority , Kreil1ng , Lay , S enti, Schwab.
Nays: No ne
Abs nt: Counci lman Lone
f
,
.· I !
'f
I
• I
• •
f
•
•
-4 -
T h e Ma yor d e clared the motion carried.
* * * * *
I ntroduced a s a Bill by Councilman Senti and read in fu ll,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE REZONING LOT 6 , EXCEPT THE WEST 14 5 FEET THERE OF, AND
LOT 7 , CENTENN IAL INDU STRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION , CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COUNTY OF
ARAPAHOE, STATE OF COLORADO , FROM I-1 DISTRICT {LIGHT INDUST RIAL) TO R-3 -A
DISTRICT {MU LTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL). Upon the call of the roll, the vote
resulted as follows:
COUNCILMAN SENTI MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORI TY SEC ONDED, THAT THE PRO-
POSED BILL FOR AN ORD INAN CE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHED IN FULL
IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD S ENTINEL AND T HAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE ES TA BLISHED F OR
JULY 1 9 , 1 97 1, AT 8:00 P .M. Upon the c a ll o f the roll , the vote resulted as
follows :
Ay es: Counci lme n Brown, Dhority, Kre iling, Lay, S enti, Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent : Councilma n Lone
The Ma yor d e cla red the mot ion carried .
* • * * *
Introduced as a Bil l by Counc i lman La y and rea d in fu ll,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINAN CE VACATING A PORTION OF THE BROADWAY/ACOMA ALLEY,
LOCATED FROM WEST HAMPDEN AVENUE ON THE NORI'H TO LI TT LE DRY CREEK ON THE
SOUTH, WHICH PORTION IS WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEW OOD AS RECORDED; RE TAINING
AND RESERV ING AN EASEMENT FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF THE ALLEY F OR ALL UTILITIES ,
SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE STORM DRAINAGE.
COUNCI LMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN BROWN SECON DED , T HAT THE PROPO SED
BILL F OR AN ORDINA NCE BE PASSE D ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHED IN FULL IN
THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD SENTINEL .
City ~t a nager Dial stated that as yet a wr itten c 011111 itment had not
been rece i v ed from Key Savings and Loan to prov ide access t o a park area at
the Broadway -U.S . 28 5 interchange . Mr . Dia l stated that the State Highway
Dep a rtment h a d budg e t e d monies during the coming fiscal year for improvement
of the area into a p a rk .
c ~ty A torncy Bc r a rdini stat e d that pr i or to fLnal rea ding the
C ity would receiv t he wr i tte n commitment from Ke y Savings a nd Loan.
Upon th c 11 o f the roll, the vote result d a s follo ws :
Ay e s : C ounc~lm en Brown , Dhor ity , Krei l ing , La y, S nt i , Schwab.
Na ys: No ne
Abs e nt: Counc ilman Lone
T h e Ma yor d ec l a red t h e motion c a rried .
* • * * *
C ity Attorne y Berardini s tated to City Council that the Knights o f
Columbus r e quest for a c lub l iquor l icense at 3800 South Santa F Lane s hould
be considered by City Council a t the June 21 , 1 97 1, meeting .
• l
•.
I • •
.• f
•
•
-5 -
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED , THAT T HE CON -
SIDERATION OF T HE KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS APPLICATION FOR A CLUB LI QUOR L I CENSE
BE REMOVED FROM THE TABLE. Upon the ca ll of the r o ll, the vote re sult ed as
fo llows:
Ayes: Counci lmen Brown , Dho r i ty , Krei l ing , Lay , Senti , Schwab.
Nays: No ne
Absent: Councilman Lone
Th e Mayor dec l ared the motion carried.
Co unci lman Krei l ing s t a t e d that h e w ished the min u tes to ref l ect
that no testimony in opposition to the granting of the l icens e had been
r e ceived by C ity Council.
COUNCI LMAN KREILING MOVED , COUNCI LMAN LAY S ECONDED , THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL GRANT THE LIQU OR LICENSE OF THE KNI GHTS OF COLUMBUS , SUBJECT TO
WRITTEN NOTIF ICATION OF T HE CONFORMANCE OF LOCATION TO ALL AP PLICABLE CODES
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. Upon the ca ll of the ro ll, the vote r e s u l ted as
f ollows:
Aye s: Counci lme n Brown, Dhority , Krei l ing , Lay , Senti, Schwab .
Nays: None
Ab s ent: Councilman Lone
Th e Mayor d ec l a r ed the motion c a rried.
* • * * *
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN SENTI SECO NDED, THAT SIDEWALK
IMP ROVEMENT DISTRICT NO . 7 1 BE IMPLEMENTED WITH THE FOLLOW I NG BLOC KS DELE TE D:
3900, 4000, 4100 AND 42 0 0 BLOCKS OF SOUTH INCA . AND 3 900 AND 4000 BLOC KS OF
SOUT H JA SON . Upon the ca ll of t he roll, the vote resulted as f ollows:
Aye s: Counci lme n Brown , Dho r ity , Krei l ing, Lay, Senti, Schwab .
Nays : No ne
Ab s ent : Counci lman Lone
The Mayo r dec l ared the motLo n c arrLed .
Intro duced as a BL ll by Counci lma n Lay and rea d in fu ll,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT , TO
BE KNOWN AS SIDEWALK IMPROVE MENT DISTRIC T NO . 7 1; ORDERING T HE CONSTRUCTION
THEREIN OF SIDEWALK IMP ROVEMENTS ; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS TO
BID UPON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH IMPROVEMENTS .
COUNCILMAN rAY MOVED, COUNCI LMAN SENTI SECONDED , THAT THE PROPOSED
BILL FO R AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHED IN FULL IN THE
ENGLEWOOD SENTINEL . Upon the ca l l of the ro ll, the vote r esulted as f ollows:
Ayes : Counc ilmen Brown , Dhority, Krei l ing , Lay , Senti , Schwab.
Nays: None
Absent: Co uncilman Lone
The May o r dec l ared the mo tion carried . I • •
• I
•' \ l
I
, ,.
•
•
-6 -
RESOLUTION NO . 30 , SERIES OF 1 9 71
A RESOLUTI ON APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR THE CITY 'S SHARE OF CONST RUC-
T I ON COSTS IN SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS.
(C o p ~ d in fu ll in the officia l Reso lu t ion Book.)
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN SENTI SECONDED , THAT RESOLU TION NO .
30 , SE RI ES OF 1 97 1 , BE ADOPTED AND APPROVED . Upon the ca ll of the r oll, the
vote r esu l ted as f ollows:
Ayes: Counci l.men Brown, Dhority , Krei l~ng , Lay , Senti , Schwab.
Nay s : None
Absent: C ounc~lman Lone
The Mayor dec l a r e d the motion carried .
• * * * *
RESOLUT I ON NO. 3 1, SERIES OF 1971
A RESOLU TIO N MAKING APP ROPRIATIONS TO THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT AN D
CITY ATT ORNEY'S OFFICE IN THE GENERA L FUND.
(C opied in f ull in the offic ial Resolution Book.)
COUNCILMAN DH ORI TY MOVED , COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDE D, THAT RE SO LU-
TION NO. 3 1, SERIES OF 1 97 1, BE ADOPTED AND APPROVED .
City Co uncil discussed the a ppointment of auditors for the year
1971.
Mayor Schwab requ ested the Council Aud ~t Committee of Mr. Krei l ing
and Mr. Dh ority LO ma k e a r e port at the next City Counci l meeting concerning
a ppointment o f audito rs for 1 971 .
Upon the c all of the roll, the vote resu l ted as follows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown, Dhor ~ty , Kr ei l ing , Lay , Sent i , Schwab .
Nays: None
Absent: Councilman Lon e
The Mayor dec l ared the m ot~on ca rried.
* * * * •
City Manager Dia l rep orted that h and Councilman Krei l ing had
recent l y a ttend d a m et1ng WLth re p r sentatives of the Urban Drainag e
District an d oth r gov rnmenta l jurisdictions within Lhe south metropol itan
a re a . Mr . Dia l stated tha upon p assage of the necessary documents to cause
the City of Eng l ew ood to be e l igible f o r f lood insurance , Council had com-
mLtted to flood plaLn zon Lng ~n the area o f the 1 00 year f lood . Mr . Dia l
stated that Mr. James Qu1nn of th Ur ban Dr ainage District was a dvocating
tha t the a re a of the Pl att RLver f rom Eng lewood s outh t o Chatfield
Reservo ir receLv f l ood plain zonLng 1n th a rea whic h had been f looded
during 1965 . Mr. Dial s a ed that this r a is much greater than the 100
year f lood plaLn and pr sented a ma p c omparLng the 100 year f lood plaLn
with th a r a f looded 1n 1 965.
CouncL lm an Kr 1 l1ng stat d that upon c omp l et1on of Chatfie l d
Res rvo 1r ~t w s p roposed that th a r ea c ould b rezone d to its no rm a l
zonLng . Mr. Kr i ling a l s o s tated hat h p roposed f lood plain zon ing
would not p rohibit b uLlding but it would r quire hat a ll bui ld ing in the
area so zon d h ve c rta1n f lood protection features .
,_
•
I • •
•' \ r
I • f . ,
!
-
-
•
•
-7 -
City Council discussed the propositio n of the Urban Drainage
Dist rict.
City Manager Dial stated that he and Councilman Yuei ling would
c ontinue to attend the various meetings concerning flood plain zoning and
keep Council informed .
* * * * *
C ity Manager Dia l informed City Council that the r e quested increase
in federa l aid for reconstruct ion of the sewage treatment plant had been
a pproved by the Enviro nmenta l Protection Agency .
* * • * *
City Manager Dia l stated that the State Highway Dep artment had
forwarded to the City of Eng l ewood the contract for TOP I CS activities for
the year 1 971-1972 (state fisca l year) of a pproximate l y $30 ,000. The
program includes the signa liza tion at the intersection o f Banno c k /Oxford,
Quincy/Logan, Dartmouth/Downing, and Downing/Hampden. Mr. Dial stated
that the signalization would include connection o f these intersections
to the monitrol system and the installation of opticon e mergency p reemption
devices.
COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVED , COUNCI LMAN SENT I SECONDED, THAT THE
PROPOSED TOPICS (TRAFFIC OPERATIONAL PROG RAM TO IMP ROVE CAPACITY AND SAFETY)
CONTRACT BE APPROVED AND THAT THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK BE AUTHORIZED TO
EXECUTE THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS . Upon the ca ll o f the roll, the vote resulted
as fo llows :
Ayes: Co unci lmen Brown , Dhority, Krei ling, Lay , Senti, Schwab .
Nays: None
Absent: Co unci lman Lone
Th e Mayor declared the mo tio n carried.
* • * * *
City Manager D1al stated that the De partmen t o f T ran s porta tion had
forwarded a contract f or execut i on by the C ity Manager f or the receiving of
grant money for the purchase o f buses for the Englewood-Little ton-Fort Logan
bus line.
COUNCILMAN DHORITY MOVED , COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED , T HAT THE
CITY MANAGER BE THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD TO
THE DEPARTMENT OF T RANSPORTAT ION AND, FURTHER, THAT HE BE AUTHORIZED TO ENTER
INTO A CONTRACT WITH THE URBAN MASS TRAN SIT AtJI'HORITY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR A CAPITAL GRANT FOR PURCHASE OF BUSES FOR THE ENGLEWOOD-
LITTLETON -FORT LOGAN BUS LINE. Upon the call of the ro ll, the vote resulted
as f ollows :
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority, Kreiling, Lay, Senti , S chwab.
Nays: None
Absent : Counci lman Lone
The Mayo r decl a red the mo tio n carried .
City Manager Dia l stated that according to the revised timetab l e
f o r the bus p urchases, bids would be opened on the new buses on August 4,
1 971.
* • * * •
I !
~
I
•
•
. .
•
f
-
•
•
•
- 8 -
City Manager Dial discussed certain problems encountered in obtaining
a rchitectural services for enlargement of the Servicenter by addition of a
p aint bay estimated at $30 ,000 . Mr . Dial stated that in l ight of these p rob -
lems he would like the City Council to consider a negotiated contract with
Rob Roy , the c ontractor who had previous l y constructed the Servicenter .
After discussion , it was the consensus of Council that the City
Manager proceed with the obtaining of an architect to design the work on the
Servicenter .
* * * * *
City Manager Dial stated that a meeting on the Eng lewood-Littleton
Bus Committee would be held on June 28, 1971, at 10:30 A.M., at City Ha ll,
to discuss with the C ity and County of Denver a proposa l for suburban bus
l ine service by the Denver Tramway.
* * * * *
Mayor Schwab invited member s of C ity Council to p articip ate in an
Eng l e wood Old-Timers Association softball game with the KHOW s oftba ll team
on Ju ly 1, 1971, at 8 :00 P .M.
* * * * *
Dick Lone.
City Council rece ived a l etter o f r esignation from City Counc i lman
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED , COUNCILMAN SENTI SECONDED , THAT THE LETTER
OF RESIGNATION FROM CITY COUNCILMAN DICK LONE BE ACCEPTED AS OF JUNE 21,
1971. Upon the call of the roll, the v o te resu l ted as fo llows:
Ayes: Councilmen Brown , Dhority, Krei ling, Lay, Senti, Schwab .
Nays: No ne
Absent: Councilman Lone
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * *
Counci lman Brown introduced Mr . Edd ie Tanguma , 4389 South Sherman
Street , who is a member of the Englewood Anima l Co ntrol Board.
Mr . Brown discussed briefly the activities of the Animal Control
Board and stated that the recommendatio ns o f the Anima l Control Board would
be f o rthcoming at City Council.
* * * * *
Councilman Kr e iling reported that he and Counci lman Brown had
me asured a number of vehicles after the June 7, 1971, City Council meeting
and had found that all pickup s , campers, and vans were over 5 -1/2 feet in
height.
* * * • ..
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED , THAT T HE MEET ING
BE ADJOURNED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as fo llows:
Ayes: Counci lmen Brown, Dhority , Krei ling, Lay , Senti, Schwab .
Nays: None
Absent: Counci lman Lone
The Mayor decla red the motion carried , and the meeting adjourned at 9:45 P .M.
~of~
. .
I • •
. , '
. ,. ... ,
•
•
0
•
_ _:.o_~...J_"'I.:~;L ~_M_4_.&.1;~-~·am1r v ,. .. .,, ~ ..... ~. ~ ·
-.: ~~ ... •••• ·, 0 : .... •,~.-:. .• :~l·=··· -.. : ... . . .; . --~---.... -.... __ ._._,_ ...
• •
.J 6 '11
ClurJ:!ter 75 cou • .;••-iEt:.Tii\G FiLE
Off-Street Parking and Par15ii~ 'eo/iNGLF\\'Ooo. COLO.
§1. Police Power Con~fdera.tions Justifving Regulation
More and more zoning ordinances contain provisions for
ofT-street parking in connection with the use of multiple
dwellings, hotels, banks, theatres and other places of public
assembly, factories, office buildings, supermarkets, depart-
ment stores and otlu.•r places in which there is or is likely to
!Je a great density of population or which are, themselves,
traffic generators.l The amount of available space for street
parking is limited. There is no more street parking space
nailable for a multi story office or apartment building on a
100 foot front lot than there is in connection with a single
family dwelling on a lot having similar frontage, yet the
requirements of parking space for t.he former will obviously
be many times that of the latter. There is a constantly grow-
ing increase in the size of buildings and in the number and
size of motor cars and trucks; the street widths remain sub-
stllntially as they were. The last two decades ha\'e seen an
unparnllelled growth in motor vehicle ownership and urban·
area usage resulting in an extreme shortage of nutomohile
parking space in most, if not all, American cities and suburban areae.•
The consequence is that provision for oil-street parking
is now generally recognized by planners and municipal offi-
cials as the only practical method of controlling street con •
gestion caused by motor use of streets. •
I The proposed new Zonine Resol ution or the City or !'\ew York
e\•en requires tllat off-street parking space be provided in connection
with one and two-family dwellinp.
1
Zo"i"g a"d Traffic, The ENO Foundation for Highway Traffic: Control, f952 ed., p . 20.
1
Zo,.ing and Traffic, supra : "They make it imperath·e that off-
street parking facilities be pro,·ided in accordance with a pre-determined
schedule ... " See Tables XIrl, p . 51 to XXIII, p. 70 indicating the
recommended parking space to be pro\·ided with re s,;>ect to various
principal uses or property.
75-1
. ,
-. .
. i
• •• t
·,
I
o I
• •
f 2X
.. ·;-..·: : .....
~ ..
•.
•
•
• •
. i:> WJ ., t:<.: 1:: :_. __ M_4..L ~l.-t • ~ltp. ~ v .--..--~-. . -·.-: .... · ... ; ... , .,. . ....
75-2 The Law of Zoning and Planning Ch . 75 ,._
Traffic rongestion and paucity of parking space hn\·e con-
scqu<'ncl's far more serious than mere annoyance, conse-
quenct·s which have proved worthy, in every rel'pect, of con-
sideratiun b ~· municipal authorities. The Jack of parking
space in c-~taltli s hed downtown areas has i;-, i:s.:lf been the
fundam<'ntal cause of those rel.atively new phenomenons, the
mot!') and th<-outlying shopping center, and of the decen-
traliz:•tion of industry to suburban and rural areall. Pnrnl-
lellin'-'" t lw rise of these has been the decline of the established
dowu:o ·.n• business nnd hotel areas and of established urban
inrlil:--tr tnl areas, with consequent deteriorntion of buildings,
of for<·erl <'atering to less d esirable tenancies. vacant build-
ings, lhs~ of revenue and taxes, increased cost of police and
fire prc•t•·ction and, generally, a form of urban blight.
·Jul:'t a.• the necessity for requiring off-street parking as a
solution for street congestion caused by too many and too
wirle ant -•rnobiles in too narrow streets and, at least partially,
for !hi.' eYils mt'ntion<-d in the last paragraph, has been
'llddely rerognized• so the val idity of such r cquirem<'nts has
been generally assumed.
The lllt,sl casual con s ideration of the probl E-ms outlined
above, inrlirate that the problems and their ~olution come
with till' l>rt>nd purposes of the exercise of the police power,
namPly, within the scope of the concepts of public safety,
health, cr-nY<'niencc. morals nnd general welfare. The pur-
poses in vi•·w clause of every zoning enabling n<'t r<'quires
that zonin,: he designed " ... to lessen congestion in the
streets: to secure safety from fire, pnni<' and other dangers;
to promc·!t· health and the general welfare; ... to facilitate
the adequate provisions of transportation, ... and other public
requirelll <'ub. Such rc~;"lations shall be made \dth reasonable
con~d c_,rat ion. among other things, to the character of the
district, and its peculiar suitability for particulnr use::;, nnd
't~dth a ~iew to conse n-ing the vnlue of buildings nnd en-
eourngil1g th e most appropriate use of land ... "
A regulation requiring the provis ion of otT -street parking
facilities for buildings us ed for tho se purposes which in themsclYe ~ nre generators of n volume of traffic or which
tend to d <'t<'riorate 01 be come municipal liabilities for Jack
• 2 Yukky, Zorcixg La:u and Pra cliu (2d ed.), 76, 77, i'8 ; City
and County of Innvcr v. Innvcr Buick, Inc. (Sup. Ct. Colo . 19W),
J-47 P.2d 919, dissentinc opinion•. p:o.~:cs 936, 937, 947.
'I
·.,· . : ~·· ·-·
·-.:l :.·.·
I ., ..
. ·
'\
:
I • •
...
0
f
-
.......
,•
__ ...._.
•
•
• •
·,.
.-. t ..··
OfT-Street Parking :md Parking Lots 75·3
of parking space,· would fall clearly within oue or more of
the qw•ted purpo ~es or a zoning ordinance. ~or would placing
11.~ burdo·n of s uch provision upon the lnndown<'r appear to
h·· oppr··ssive, confi ~c atory, discriminatory or nnrea~onable
sio··t· it is the landowner whose u~e of the pr,:tnises in\'ites
an•! tl;u;; cause~ the congestion.•
'L'he validity of the requirement o( off-str~t ·t parking faeili-
lt•·~ for specified uses need not be estahlish•!<l by argument
or by analogy to other restrictions and regulntao11s held valid.
"There are cases which hold particular off -s tree t park-
ing requirctiwnts invalid upon the hasis of th eir ~pecinl
arbitrariness. All of thesr, laowe,·e r, pro,·eed on the
premise that off-s treet parking generclly i~ valid." See
Hhyne, Municipal Law, 967 ...
The decisi ons which uphold ofT -s tree t parking gen-
~rnlly deal in each i_nstance with th~ H;ality of the
specific regulation as applied to particular fact. This is
apparent from the discussion in Ilhyn ~. ~up ra . ~o case
that we hn >e be en able to find in,·nlidnh'• the principle
of off-street parking. For el:nmple, in City of ~ew Or-
leans v. Leeco (In re Wimbe rly) ~26 La. 335, 76 So.2d
387, the Court enforced an off-stre..t parking r equire-
ment as applied to movie theatre~. In Roselle v. Wright,
37 ~.J. Super. 507, 117 A .2d 661, 667, the Court held an
off-street parking requirement for a ~tornge gn rnge to
be unreasonable in view of its particular t cran s, but at
the same time recognized the valiJity of ~uch regulation
where it bears a substantial relationship to the public
health, safety, morals or general welCare. The Court
aaid:
' .. : That pro\"ision as applied to ~t o res, warehouses,
office buildings, or other commercial l'lruc:tures, to
which it may reasonably he anti('ipat<'d large numbers
of people would come by mr nn s of automobile~, thus
gh;ug ri ~e to congestion in the public streets, appe a rs
to be entirely reas onable and logical ... '
See also Allendal e Congregation of J cho\·ah's Wit-
nesses v . Gros man, 1950, 30 N .J . 2i3, 152 A .2d 569. Tbia
• Dunham, "A Ltpl and Economic nasis for City Planning," 58
Col1wabio 1-aa· Rn -1<'11', 650, 6M, 667 (~lay 1958, ~o . S).
(Cop , rt&kt lf60. bt Ard en H . lla1hh,t)
'
: _'7,: r
.·
. ,
·, . ·.
'•
,,
. '
·'
' I
I • •
0
' I t I
"
.•.
•
•
• •
. -: _:_~~_.J_'='_La:;._ __ n_v.-.;..1.-.t ·anP.J v
~: .. ". .
75-4
. . . ·~ . ~ ... . .. . . ....
The Law of Zoningand Planning Ch. 75
holds a requiremen-t of one parking space for cvl.'ry three
~cats in a church to bl.' reasonable.
State ex rl.'l. 1\:ill cc n Realty Co. v. City of East Cleve-
land, 1958, 108 Ohio App. 99, 153 K.E . 2d 177,• rccog-
ni7.C=' that :;uch provisions arc valid and cites ~lcSorley
\'. l~itzgo:rahl, 359 Pa. 26-t,· 59 A.2d 1-!2 and !llany other
cas!':; which deal ''i~h similar and related problems.
)I ir~chcl v. Wcisscnbcrgerr277 App. Div. 1039, 100 ~.Y.S.
2·1 -t52, recognizes the general validity of such require-
m~uts and also holds that the vesting of authority in a
board to make particular determinations docs not con-
~titntc an unlawful dele~;ation of legislative authority.
S<"l' also Fleishon v. Philadelphia Zoning noard, 385 Pn.
295, 122 A.2d 6i3, and Hill v. Kesselring, 310 Ky. -t3S,
220 S.W.2d 858, 10 A.L.R.2d 1301 and see ForonofT, The
R~>lationship of Zoning to Traffic Generators, 20 Law
and Contemporary Problems 197 (1955). Town oC Islip
v. t'. K Summer:> Coal & Lumber Co., 1931, 257 :s'.Y.
167. 177 ~.E. 409, is analogous in that it upholds n zoning
ordinance requiring building set backs." 1
A claim thut nn ordinance permitting owners of busin~ss
property to use adjoining re~id e ntially zoned land, if it could
be obtain ... !, for ofT-street parking facilities to be used in
ronn('ction with the business property, was in\•nlid, wa~ re-
jected by the Supreme Court of llichigan which held snch
provision to be a rea s onnble ext'rcise of the police power,
enacted in the interest of public safety, health and general
welfar(', enacted in the interest of public safety, health and
general welfare, in that it represented an attempt on the
• State ex rei. Killeen Realty Co. v. City of East Cle\'cland was
aff'd in lW :"<.E.Zd 1 (Sup. Ct . Ohio 1959).
• City and County of Denver v. Denver Buick, Inc., supra . dissent
of Doyle, ]. at page 947. The majority of the court, while recognizing
the problent; caused by automobile con;;estion, declared that other mea-
surts micht be taken to control it a nd that the r~quirement that a prop-
erty owner devote 'part of his property to off-street parking purposes
was confi scation of private property for public purposes. Three juclges
dis~entcd from thi s p3rt of the opinion of the majority. See aho City
and County of Denver v . Redding-~filler. Inc. (Sup . Ct . Col o . 1960),
in wliich the court s im ila rl y held that the ofT-st reet parking pro,·i~ions
or the Denver zoning ordin ance weO<: invalid .
. '
• .
. ·• ~ .
. . .• r
·.
. '
I • •
,
-
-•.···
,•
.,
•
•
• •
·. •·.
.:.
Off-Street Parking and Parking Lots 75-5
part of the city to protect its. "itizens from traffic hazards
in business o.li~tricts and to protect the business~s thCJnsclves
from econc11nic stran1:,'Ulation c:1used by traffic congestion and
lark of parking space.•
'l'ht> c·a~e~ in which the.courts haYe upheld off-street park-
ing r•·qnirc·mcnts by implication, deter111i11illg only whether,
in 1 he c:n~e hcfore it, the property owner has complied there:
with• or whether lhc particular requirement was reasonable'•
1 Utlay , .. City of Dearborn (Sup. Ct. Mich . 1959), 96 N.\V.2d 775.
" \\'indsor Hills Imp . Ass'n v. ~layor & City Council of Daltimore
PI•!. 1, 73 A .2d 531, in which the requirement was held satisfied by
e,u.bloshment of the required off-street parking lot on an adjoining
plol wi1hin 300 feet from proposed multiple dwelling; :'>!cKinney v.
Ro :o n: of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City p!o.), 308 S .\\'.2d 320,
in "hoc it it was he!<! that the seating capacity of a chun:h s'hool cafeteria
nu I not be included in total seating capacity of church in calculating
I Ill• um of required off-street parking bcilities; and see Summers v.
Ilo:.rol ,,f loJIIing Adjust ment of Kansas City (;..to.), 299 S.W.2J SS3,
in wl ich it was held that a street which did nut go throu~:h the block in
which the church's proposed parking lot was located was not an "in-
ter,ccr:n.: street" within the meaning of the ordinance ; Fleishon v.
Phi'a<.•:lploia Board of Adjustment, 385 Pa . 295, 122 A .2d 673 in which
penni· s were revoked as invalid because no :~ccess w3s provided to
parki ng $pace ; Roselle v. \\'right (~.J . 1955). 37 '!'.J . Super. 507, 117
A .2d ti•!. in which the denial of a permit for pri•·a tc stor:~ge of truck5
was re' ersed, where ordinance required ofT-street p.uking; Chambers
v. 7.c ·ning floard of Adjustment of \\'inston-Salem (:\.Car.), 108 S .E .2d
211, m which it was held that the off-street parking requirement con-
tainc-1 en the zoning oruin:~nce could not be waived 'lly the Zoning noard
of AdJu>unent nen though on-stree t parking sp.~ce might i·we been
snfficitnl; ~lorris•·ille Shopping Center, Inc . ,., Board of .\djnstment
( Pa. l'orn. Pl.). 8 Ducks 263 in which the court construed the term
"gro,s :.rea per ar"' as applied to the size of required off -s:rect parking
~p~c•·s; Appli,ation of G~ruen City Jew ish Center ('!'.\'. !956), 2 ;..tisc .
2d 1001, !55 '!'.Y .S.2d 523; State of \\'a ~hington ex rd. Wen atchee
C on~. of Je ho~·a h's Witnes ses v. City of Wenatchee ( !957), 312 P.2<.1
!95 . l~tdw o od City Comp.~ny of Jehovah's Witnesses, Inc . v. City of
~fenlt • !'ark (Cal. 19 59), 167 A. C.:\. 77!!; Young Israel Or~;:\ni z.~tion
of ('1.-.-cland , .. Dworkin (Ohio 1956), !33 ~.E.2d 17-l ; Congregation
Te111 :ol1 !.rae! ''· City of Creve Coeur (;..to . !959), 320 S.W.2d 451,
in a:l uf which the court loy implication upheld ofT-street parking re-
(Cop,n1ht 1960. '' Arlk• R l•tt:lr:or(J
'
,._
,• .. · .
·. ·' \ !
'!'
. .
• .
I • •
0
'
....
•
•
• •
Ch. 75
The L aw ol Z~)lling ::md Planning
75-6
are even more numerous. There is litHe lloubt but thnt the
decision of Colorado court in City nnd County of Denver
v. Denver Buirk. Inc ., suprn, docs ;not represent the gcn•Hnl ---quircm~nt s lnr churches as special e:<ception uses and found th ~y had
~en reasona.lll~· c01nplicd with.
10 RIJnJ:, ''ealty Corp .. v. Lawton, 414 111. 313; 111 KE .2J 310
(Ill. 19S3 in w\\ich the requirement ol provision lor ofC -stre<t parl..ing
lor aparu~oent houses anJ not for other multiple usc buildings wa> htld
discriminatury; Board ol ?.onin); Appeals ol Decatur v. Decatur, Ind.
Company,,[ Jtho,·ah's Witnesses, lli );.E.2d llS tlnd .) in which the
requirement of otT-street parking spaces lor chun:hes in proporticm to
the m<mber e>i ,.ats in the church was hclcl unre4.sonable; Ridge,·i, w Co.
v . Board of :\tljustment ol Florham Patk (L. Div . Super. Ct ~.J. 19~9), 15·1 :\.2d 23, in which the court held that a borou~:h >oning
orJinance r.:qu:ring six square feet o f pa:l:ing area !M each one S•l"are
loot ol gross floor area used lor !Ju,incss, conunercial or pecsonal
ser,·icc ~staLlislunents and r et3il stores in the business zone w~s ar·
biuary, unreasC!llaule and not designed to lunher the proper purposes
of zoninj;. Th< court fo und that such pro,·ision was excp>ive when
mrasure..i It)' tl:c average parking ratios as f1:<ed by ordinance> elscwh~re
and as seen in l 'ractice elsewhere; :O.lahcr , .. 13oard of Zoning & :\ppcals
( t:nreportcd, ~ .Y . Supreme Cot\r t, Special Term, !\ .Y .L.). Jan. 23,
1959}, in whh:h the court cOll>trued an ordinance which required two
square lt~l ol off-street parking space .for each square loot of floor spac~ used fcrr ·comm~rcial purpos~s within the main building . The court
said : " ... th~ t~rm 'comtn~rcial floor space' may be th~ subjN:t I
varic<l interpr~tation. This is particularly true in ~nt~rtain<nrnl or
recreational enterprises . Theatr~s . boxing ar~nas, ice and r<'llcr
skating rinks ut ilit~ the major portion of floor spJc~ for the ac·
commodation of spec t ators. Football , bheball an<l polo fi~l<ls devote
the major ar~a of thos e facilities to the fields upon which th,· par·
ticipants perform . In short, 'conunercial floor space' "hen aJ'plied
as a criterion of rcquir~d parking space is !lexibl ~. Particubrly in r~cr~a tional cnt~rprisc it ,•ari~s with the t) pc :unus~men t or recrea·
tion provi J~d. The number of spectators int~ndcd to be accommo·
dated is the better norm :\nd th~ ndequlC )' of par~in!; !Jcilitics wh~n det~nuin~d in tbt li~;ht is a matter lor d~tcn ni natio n by a•l ·uinis·
trative officials . l'n\ess ,uch d~t~r mina tion is unr~asonab\e. arbi·
.·
. ;
.,
' ..
-·
...
• .
I • •
.•
1--
•'
-~
•
•
• •
.;:,WJ..J._I:'L:\:~ __ j'I_4.,Ll;.J.-r·allll.J v HP,., ,.,.,.n .. ," '.
~--:-.~ .. ~ ·-··. --_,.: .... _o.t.-. ..• ~ .. ..:~-. ~ . • ..
. . · -···-.
;-
Off -Street Parking and Parking Lots 75-7
rulr awl will represe nt an even greate r minority view as the
proiJiem is considered in more jurisdictions.
§2 . Parking Lot ll.S P.ropcr Accessory Use
Tht· other s:~u:1.~io:l imolving 1.m rking lots is that in .,.hich
the zoning ordinance docs not require off-street parking but
the propt·rty owner has claimed a right to <>stablish off-street
parking as an accessory usc of his property oJr by means of
a variance.
In Buft'alo Park Lane, Inc. v. City ·or llufTalo," it was held
that a hotel had the right to use a small parcel of its land
in a residential zone for parking automobiles hclonging to its
guests. The court found nothing in tiH~ zoning ordin a nce for-
bidding the usc of vnc:1nt ground bel onging to or adjoining
a piece of land for automobile parking purposes and said
further that:
"The court has no hesitancy in saying that in its
opinion the pr o vi ~io n and usc by apartment hotels of
parking spnce for guests is a necessary incident of the
business of an apartment hot el and in relation to tl1e
Zoning Ordinnnce an c.cce3sory use of the premises of
the apartment hotel."
Parking lots hnw been held to be acress ory uses to the
principal use of adjoinins premises in a number of other
cllses.11
trary or capricious the finding of the administrative officials must
~ sustained.
State v. City of T3 mpa, Fla. ( 1950), 48 So.2d iS , <'pp!ic a tion of
Community Synagogue v . Bates (:\.Y . 19:6 ). Hi :\.Y .S .2d 204, aff'd
I~ :\.Y.S .2d 15, I A .D.2d 6S6. aff'o.l I :\.Y .:?J -H::, 136 :--i .E .2d ~<l.S;
all of" hich im ·oh·e off-street p~rking r egulations fo r churches as sper.ial
exception. uses.
11 Buffalo Park Lane, Inc. v . City of 13uffalo, 162 :\fi sc . 207, 294
:\.Y.S . 413 .
u State ex rei. Szodomka v. Gru~r. 201 La . 1063, 10 So.2d 899
(accessory to hotel ); First :\ational Bwk & Trust Co. of Port Chester,
S .Y . v . Zoning r::o~rd of Appeals of Greenwich, 126 Conn . 228, 10
A .Zcl 691 (wo uld he customarily incident a l to use of an island, if sea-
wan had ~en constructed as required); Board of Zoning Appeals of
IC.,rric!at 1960, b, A tdrc H Ra tl "-opf)
. (
•.
'll
~ 1 '
I • •
·' ' r I ' !
•
• •
_ _;_~~_)_~t.:I:L •. J'l.U_J.l;.J.-r·a!lliJ v l(p<:, n<>n~ •" •
•••••••--• o .-_,,: ...... _1':'4-... :'a• ~..:-• .. • • •
CITY OF TUSTIN MAY 11, 1970
THRU: City Administrator
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKING
STANDARDS
The City Council has expressed concern over the adequacy
of parking standards for multi-family residential de-
velopments within the City of Tustin.
This report is an attempt to determine the adequacy of
accommodations and parking area problems of the City of
Tustin by comparison with other communities, observations,
analysis of existing situations and recommendation for
remedial actions.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS -Apartment House Parking
Tustin:
Bachelor apartments
One bedroom apts.
Two bedroom apts.
Three or more bedrooms -
One
One
One
Two
(1)
and
and
(2)
parking space
one half (lis)
one half (l~)
Los Angeles County Association of Planning Officials (Model
Standards) :
Two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit.
Orange County Zoning Code:
One and one half (1~) per dwelling unit.
Urban Land Institute:
Two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit.
City of Los Angeles:
One (1) space for each dwelling unit less than
three habitable rooms.*
One and one half (1~) spaces for each dwelling
unit of three habitable rooms.
. .
• .
I • •
-_...,..,.
.. '
-
•
•
0
•
·ii:>W.J..J_t::_l.:l::l._ __ MJ.~).l;.l.-t ·afll11 V WP"1 ,.,.,n .. ," I .
--=~Jc~~·-M~i~.1.-FAm.1.iy Residential
Parking Standards
Two (2) spaces for each dwelling unit of more
than thr e e habitable rooms.
*(A one bedroom apartment would require 1~ parking
.spaces; kitchens are defined by ordinance as a
habitable room~)
Table II of the Apartment Parking Survey dated October, 1968,
presents comparative parking requirements for cities in Orange
County, to refl e ct latest amendments.
On a comparative basis, Tust.i,n standards are ·equal to the
average requirements of cities but less than those proposed
by model ordinances.
Ratio of Cars to Units
The Building Industry Association of California, Inc. con-
tracted in May 1, 1969, for an analysis of automobile owner-
ship and parking requirements for multi-family residences
in Orange County cities. The results of the study indicated
an average of 1.4 vehicles per unit. However, in three-bed-
room units that catered to family type living for adults and
children, the occupancy rate was three and four persons with
a high of 2.6 vehicles per unit.l
The following extracted statistics pertain to Tustin Apart-
ment Complexes.
Building Name Address
Castilian 14330 Newport Ave.
Casa Ganar 15520 Tustin Village
Way
Segovia 15~'t.J Tustin Village
Way
No. of
Units
117
82
86
No.of
Cars
123
113
ll7
Ratio
1.08
1.35
1. 36
Occupancy standards for multi-family developments within the
City of Tustin indicates 2.206 occupants per unit in the R-3
(1750) Districts and 1.574 occupants per unit in the R-3 (1250)
District. 2
1) B.D.F. Corporation, Fullerton, California, June 6, 1969.
2) State Department of Finance Census Certification.
Page 2
. '
·-
I • •
·' \ ! '
"-·--·
•
•
0
•
Subject: Multi-Family Residential
Parking Standards
5/ll/70
The State Department of Motor Vehicles indicates automobile
registration in Orange County is equivalent to one vehicle
for each adult. Based on the occupancy density of apartment
houses within the City of Tustin, 1.89 parking spaces would
be required for each adult unit. Family units w.ith children
of driving age could result in an even higher demand for
parking accommodations.
Field Inspections
Fire Chief Morgan Hilton, approximately 18 months ago, made
a survey of apartment house parking at 5:00 A.M. on a Sunday
morning.
His survey disclosed cars parked on the streets surrounding
apartment houses with varying degrees of available ~n-site
parking as follows:
Bldg. Name Location
Street
Units Parking Vacant On-Site
Palmwood 467 E. 1st. 102
Tustin Acres 650 W. Main 180
Tustin Village Way 15500 Tustin 234
Village Way
4 5
Numerous 30\
Numerous Adequate for all
cars on street
The Community Development Director surveyed apartment house
with the following parking at midnight, Thursday, May 7, 1970,
observations:
Bldg:. Name Location Units
Tustin Acres 650 w. Main 180
Las Campanas 1082 : :ain 38
Williamshire 15500 Williams ll9
Tustin Arms u 15701 Tustin Village 120
Way
The Enrique 15660 Tustin Village 84
way
Village west 15610 Tustin Village 76
Way
Aspens 15652 Williams 130
(a) vacant spaces were to rear of project
along freeway.
Page 3
'
Street Vacant
Parkin9: on-Site
36 67
3 10
0 58
Numerous Adequate
Numerous Adequate
Numerous Adequate
Numerous Adequate
''
(a)
I • •
f
1-
.. • -.:-'E""C
•
•
0
•
-~-.-....... --··-··-·------
Subject: Multi-Family Residential
Parking Standards
Bldg. Name Location
Hampton Sq. 16411 Mc;Fadden
Rancho San Juan Red Hill & San Juan
(County)
Valencia Gardens 15742 Williams
Winston
Luxury
Republic ·
1132 Bryan ·
16561 Alliance
15481 WilHams
Street
Units Parking
350 Numerous
8
165 0 (c)
93 9
28 Solid
224 ~
(b) Inconvenient location of available spaces.
(c) Property wall made street parking inconvenient.
(d) High vacancy -new project.
Findings
5/11/70
Vacant
On-Site
Adequate
16 (b)
Adequate
Adequate
10
250 (d)
The 16500 block of Alliance Street has a critical parking
problem. The four-plexes on the south side of Alliance Street
are hopelessly inadequate for off-street parking. The garages
are sub-standard in size, poorly lighted, and nearly impossible
to use. A compact car is the only vehicle that could utilize
these off-street parking spaces.
All other observed apartment areas of the City had a sufficient
number of off-street parking spaces to accommodate the vehicles
parked on the surrounding streets. (This same observation was
made by the Fire Chief 18 months ago.) However, the number of
on-site parking spaces neither assured adequacy nor use.
Tustin Village Way in 1n example of sufficient number of on-site
parking spaces that are vacant while there is an abundance of
on-street parking. It appears obvious that tenants will park
their vehicles at the closest, most convenient place, and on
the street in preference to a remote on-site parking place.
When apartment houses were set back from the street, interiorly
oriented, and surrounded by a perimeter wall, there was a
greater tendency to use the on-site park i ng facilities. Ve-
hicles were parked on the street wh e n on-site accommodations
were available. However, in the majority of these instances,
the parking spaces were inconvenient to the units served, poorly
lighted and remote.
Page 4
. '
I • •
•• 1 r
I
,
"
•
•
• •
---.. ·~~---····· P~;king Standards
The Williamshire Apartments represented the City's desire
with adequate parking accommodations and no on-street
parking. Parking spaces were well lighted, numbered,
named, and_ convenient to the units served.
Only in rare instances did any apartment complex designate
a convenient area for guest parking.
Analysis
Parking standards for multi-f~mily developments in Tustin
are adequate for present occupancy. They are not adequate
to accommodate the trends toward family occupancy of apart-
ment houses and ownership of a vehicle by each adult.
Neither do apartment complexes provide necessary accommoda-
tions for guest parking.
The design of apartment complexes to assure convenience of
on-site parking spaces and interior orientation to avoid
the use of street parking is a matter of concern to the
Development Preview Committee. They will continue to
exercise jurisdiction to gain this objective.
The City Council should be cognizant that it is highly un-
likely that any change will be made in the parking standards
for Orange County. Apartment houses will be built within
the sphere of influence of the City of Tustin, but under
Orange County standards. If the standards of the City of
Tustin impose an extreme hardship (from the developer's
viewpoint) for off-street parking, over and above the
standards of the County, it can be assumed that the de-
velopments will take place outside of the incorporated
limits and outside of City design standards. Yet, the
City of Tustio will inherit the problems of the future for
those developments which take place within the boundaries
of its ultimate limit=·
The apartment house parking survey and staff recommendations
were considered by the Planning Commission on November 12,
1968. The matter was continued 'and no final action was
taken upon the s t a ff proposal. The preponderance of testi-
mony presente d to the Pla nning Commission was in opposition
to any increase in p a rking requirements for multi-family
developments. Attache d h e reto is a copy of the parking sur-
vey prese nted to the Planning Co mm ission on Novemb e r 12, 1968.
It is apparent that an increa se in off-street parking re-
quirements for multi-family d e velopments will receive less
than enthusiastic support.
Recommendation
The study conducted by the Planning Staff in 1968, as sup-
plemented by current s urve ys, indicates tha t pa rking
-5-
I . •
-,
,
•
•
0
•
. .,w.>Jt::c .. a ::: MU.Lt::.L-t ·am.LJ.Y .Kes1aent1aJ.
Parking Standards
5/ll/70
problems were created in large -measure by the developments
prior to 1966. It is also believed that current develop-
ments will create future .problems. The staff recommends
the following multi-family parking standards:
Bachelor & One Bedroom Apartments -1~ parking spaces.
Two Bedroom Apartments . -2 parking spaces.
Three or More Bedroom Apartments -2~ parking spaces.
Not less than 10% of to~al parking spaces to be
conveniently located and designated for guest
parking.
If it is the desire of the City Council to protect against
future parking congestion and obsolescence by the adoption
of model ordinance standards, it is recommended that this
report be referred to the Planning Commission for the
scheduling of a public hearing and recommendation of an
amendment of the Zoning Ordinance to the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
Ff, X-..cd. ..f _; .. 1 (J._
R. Kenneth Fleagle
Ass't CA -Community
Development Director
R.KF/jat
enclosure:
-6-
'
'
,_
. '
I • •
-:,-.~" 0 ;
. I ! . , f I
"
I
'
•
' •
Page 2 revised by RKF 5/ll/70
PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION
NOVEMBER 12, 1968
APARniENT PARKING SURVEY
CITY OF TUSTIN
CALIFORNIA
BY PLANNING DEPAR'lMENr
OCTOBER 1968
,;_
The following indivuals spoke in opposition to
increased parking requirements:
George Arqyros
Robert Hall
Gared Smith
Kenneth Nelson
Charles Greenwood
No final ·action taken on proposed increase
in parking standards •
• 0
• •
.·
I
'
•
•
. · • •
.... _._....,.-........,.. ,.,. '
'Introduction
AS a result of increasing concern among City Councilmen about the adequacy of parking facilitie1 in apartment di1trict1, the Council
requested that the Planning Commission study the problem and make a report of their finding1. Thi1 report i1 a compilation of in•
formation obtained by Planning Deparbnent personnel, an analysis of the information and a reca..eaded ~pL.Dent&tion procra..
Background
Apartment development in the City of Tustin hu enjoyed a very dynamic period of growth durin& the 1960'•· '1'be buildiq lluaap which
has affected many communities in the late 60's baa not slowed the development of apartment unit1 in Tuatin .. vitDe11ad by the 1tatiltic1 in Table I below.
TABLE I
April 1966 April 1967 April 1968
Units 7. Units 1 Unit I 1
Single Family 2061 51 2252 47 .. 2684 47
Multiple Family ~0 49 _.illQ_ 53 3042 53
Total 4041 4802 5726
The developments SUIIIllarized above took place under the present parkin& reauLationa which were adopted in .Jaouary. 1966 and ·are as follow:
Type Unit
Bachelor
1 Bedroom
2 Bedroom
3 or more Bedrooms
(in each case, one space per unit muat ~e
Spaces/Unit
1
1%
1\
2
covered)
Th~ above requirements do not give credit for on-street parking spaces and ·muat be considered to provide for gue1t parking in other
than on-street spaces. A tour of apartment areas during early morning hours quickly indicate1, however, that parking needs are not
a de qu.ne ly s erved on the site. Severe parking problema are found on Pasadena Avenue and Tuatin Village Way m!l though !!.! 1pace1 !!!.!:. !!.2£. u t i liz c d .2!1 .2.ill..
Park •ns <t andards in Tustin can be compared with those of other Orange County cities in Table II (next page). Twelve citiea have le11
'''lngent requirements than Tustin, eight have more atringent requirementa 1 one city ha. the 1aa. requir ... nt and ooe (Villa Park) doaa Dot permit apartments.
0
r .L
~
-.
I
•
"
•
. •
CITY
Ana~e i.':l
B~~C .1
Bu c n.:t P."lrk
CC's ::n ~-:cs .\
c,,·..,:·,s ,,
•
• •
TABLE II Pa~e 2 '
PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN ORANGE CO'I.IlmC
. 1968 ~
Provision for ~:isc .
BACH 1 BDR.'-1 2 BDRM 3 or More Garage Open Carport Stall alley, backipg Rew.:1rks
! \ I y i " I \. l I I I I I 11.!; \. ! ll~ I I H: I ' I 1%; ... Yes -10 1 X20 1 Y..:s PD. 1 cover~d l o"c:1 . o-1 ""I --I • '• , , I oe:r l1:11._. .
I R4 H ' R4 11;. I R4 2 J R4 2 1 _L_ .. I .. _ Y~_s __ ._l10 1 x20 1 Yes I R3 2/u:li.t 1
I 11; 11; I l 'i ___ l _l!; I 1. I I Yes i 10 1 x20 1 I Yes
i I . I I I ! From 1 -7 unit complex I 1 1 I 9 1 x20 1 Yes
l !2 spaces peJ unit I I 1-\ I !., No 9 1 x20 1 *
For 50 ur.:ts 1/uc ~:us
28 Ooe:t Sl;::!CCS
Carport o~y b~ i£ i:'s
not visibb.
?Ct::J t;.i:-. V::~llev I l l!; -~I -l l;-I 2 I Yes I No 10 1 x20 1 *
\-.J.~d c ~ Grove
Fullerton
Hu:·.~ington Bch.
La t;t:r . .l Beach
L::. l!abra
w Pal.:::a
Los Al=itos
~:e •.;?.:>rt: Beach
r :.J.n e?.e
?i..1.::entia
~
,.? _;, .. ,. -·; ·" -·· r
-2 .
; .·.··-., .... ~~~·-"
I I ! I 1% i ~~~1 2 I 2 Yz.. Yes
Yes
Ye !; if 6 1
wail is
surround in ...
9 1 xl9 1
s!ix20 1
'i:
~'(
1 on-street pa~ki~~ is
pe~ittec if oos s i ~!e .
1 ~~--1--1 1-\ I . · 1 on-street for
· ·
1
( 1 must be covered) 2 . Yes Yes . Yes '9 1 x19 1 * • g~sts. :
! I I Over 1000 sq. it. • ~50 % m~s_t b e lcoverg~)_~ ----j _l --~'----Yes . Yes 10'x20~ ~----~cs - -~~~rkin:; spaces ;;cr
I 1!; l li ' 1~
(l must 'be cove r ed ) I
I 2 I 2
(l r.1es t :be enclosed)!
2
1
-1~
1
. 1'i r--n-
< l must be c.overed
1 I l
I Il l
I ~ ( l must be covered)
I 1 1
Garden A;>ts
& R3 ; .
2 l 2
R4-l~ 1% must be in
e:ara <r e in all
1
2
1-\i Yes
2 Yes
~-
Yes
l Yes
1 Yes
I 2 Yes
Yes 9 1 x20 1
Yes 10 1 x20'
No 10'x20 1
No 9'x20'
I Yes No 9'x20'
Yes Yes lO'x20'
*
*
It is decided on
the precise plan.
Yes
*
*
Here tilo~.n 4 ut. ::'<!-
quires l addtl. ;>ark.
spaE:e
Xorc than 10 u:s.
addtl ~ oa~k in~ s =.::c c.
• In R-4 all in Gara&e
• •
.....
..... : .....
·.
I
"
•
.... ~
\.d."-Y
Sari Clemente
San Juan
Cap is trano
Santa An a I
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tu s tin
Villa Pa rk
Wc stm inister
Yorba Linda
un.Vll• .L U&.#A~-1. .. &.11'.111.'6-..
puElex Res. ~ R3G
1!:;/ut in allj ~
R-3 1/ut in all
R-4 & R-5 1~/ut in all
types
1 1~ 1-\
1 1~ 1-\
(No ne of them has to
be cnc lased } I
1 ~ ut for all types
(All must be covered)
1-\ 1-IJ 1-IJ
1 1% 1%
TABLE II
PARXING REQUIREMENTS IN OIWIGE COUifi'Y
1968
3 ., ........ -.. -·~ v-•-A...., -.. -·~·~
Yes Yes
2 Yea No
1-\ Yea Yes Yea
Yes No
2 Yes ~ No
2 Yes _"01
They have no apt re~u1ation standards
1% 1-\ 2 I 2-\ ls
' 1 open \open
I
Until July 1, 1968 the ~ounty Zoning Qr~inance is used.
11 -.~~-··
9'xl9'
9 x20
9'x20'
9'x20'
lO'x20'
9'x20'
10'x20'
* -Backing to the portion of street right of way and direct access to parking apacea or through alleys
are regulated by Review Boards, when precise development plan is a~itted.
, _.., ........ ----·-... ·-------------
•
'-. • •
__ ...
-.
. ,_-.
'Paz.a l L
Provision for Misc.
11 -··~J .,_._'"' .... !.l!!L ,.,..,u"""'" '"'~
I All parking spaces
must be covered.
Ye s
Yes PD calls for 1
additional open
oarki~ ~~ce.
Yea R-4 garden apartcent
require s 1 enclosed /
Yes
* Their definition of a
carport is same as
g_ara_g_e •
* 1 covered
*
-
•
If · ·-,
.l • • ;]
. .
.
Pace 4
\
" "Designer - Develope r Comments
In an attempt to obtain comments relative to the adequacy of our present parking requirements a letter requesting such comments
wa s maile d to eighteen groups and individuals. Included within the group were Architects, Building Deaigaera, Developers, Real
Estate Salesmen, the Building Industries Association and the Chamber of Commerce. The responaes are included in the appendix of
this report.
Of the five responses so far received, the general feeling was that our present requirements are adequate. One response felt that
the requirements should be increased by one-half space across the board. Another recammended an tncreaae of 1/8 apace per unit
for guest parking with credit for on-street parking.
Tenant Int e rview
The opinions of apartment unit tenants was obtained through interview of a sampling of tenants in 19 apartment complexes. Althouab
the sampling was minimal it is felt that the information derived is useful.
Thirty-eight interviews were made asking eight questions. Of the units interviewed, One Bedroom Units averaged 2.3 residents and
1.3 automobiles. Two Bedroom Units, averaged 2.4 residents and 1.63 automobiles. Three Bedroom Units averaaed 3.7 residents and e 1.61 automobiles.
Three questions were ~ske~ which solicited an opinion from the tenant being interviewed:
1. Are parking spaces convenient to your apartment unit?
2. Would you be willinS to sacrifice open space to have
parking spaces located closer to your apartment?
3. Are guest spaces available? Y/N
adequate? Y/N
convenient? Y/N
______ Y/H
______ Y/H
Only 4 tenants felt that parking spaces were not convenient to his unit and only 5 tenaats would agree to sacrifice open apace to
have spaces closer to the unit. The questions relative to guest parking spaces elicited a more significant responae; approxtmately
one-half of the persons felt that guest spaces were not available, were not adequate and were not coav.nlent.
,......,
•
, • ~
•
__ ...
·.
L
I
•
•
I
'
•
·'
' .
City of Tustin
Name of Complex
No. of Interviews
Palmwood Gardens
1
2
3
4
5
Rancho Yorba
1
:!
3
Tustin Acres
1
2
Town Center Aparts •
1
2 ~Winston Pk.Gdns.
1
2
Tu st 1n Square
1
2
Wilnblc ton Hall
1
--f70~cailinn Circle
1
Trinidad Apartments
1
2
Newport Galaxie Apts
1
2
The Castilia'n
1
frhe-s c!ovia
' 1
2 :-v 1l l age West
I
1
---
No. & Type of
Units in Comp lex
Bach. 1br. 2br. 3br.
79 23
28 12
(l! 1-0)
1o
)b
34 lO
3 1
22 32
9 48 36
92 25
48 38
52 24
Parking
Cov. 10oen
97 45
40 20
160 90
1o 8
;)0 plUS
44 lb
4 z
54 27
93 47
121 56
So 43
52 24
TAllLE III
APAR'IMENT PARKING SURVEY
October 1968
Parking Type 'No. of !
Space :I Unit I I .
1 Pers. 1Autos
Unit. lnterviewed 1 in ut. 'Owned
1.39
2 bdnn. 3 2
2 bdnn. 4 1
2 bdnn. 2 2
2 bdnn. 3 2
2 bdrm. 2 2
1.5
1 bdnn; 2 1
1 bdnn. 2 1
2 bdnn. 2 2
1,;)
2 bdrm. 3 1
2 bdnn. 3 1
1.5
2 bdnn. 2 1
2 bdrm. 2 2
2 bdrm. 3 2
2 bdrm. 4 2
f
2 bdrm. 2 1
2 bdrm. 2 1
l.3b
2 bdrm. 2 2
1.::>
2 bdrm. 2 2
1.5
2 bdnn. 2 2
2 bdrm. 3 2
1.09
1 bdrm. 3 2
2 bdrm. 5 2
1.51
2 bdrm. 2 1
2 bdrm. 2 1
1.5
2 bdnn. 2 2
2 bdrm. 2 2
l,U
2 bdrm. 2 1 • .
'
•
""' • •
1'•&• s
·L P1ann1n& Department
Parkin& !Are Sac. Open
Charac. Rent !Spaces Space for Guest Spac e s
Res. St.Soace Conven. addt 1. l'klt. Available IAdeaua. Conv enient
2 Yes No No No. No. No.
1 Yea Yes No Yea Yea Yes.
1 1 Yes Yes No No No No
1 1 Yes No Yes No No No
1 1 Yes Yea Yes No No No
1 No Yea Yea Yes Yes Yu
1 No Yes llo Yes Yes Yes
1 1 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
1 No Yes No Yes No Yes
1 No Yes No No No No
1 No Yes No No No No -l
1 1 No Yes No No No No I
I
2 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes ' 2 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes I
1 No Yes No Yes • Yes Yes :
1 No Yes No Yea No Yes
2 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
1 1 No Yea No No No No
1 1 No Yes No No No No
1 1 No No No No No No
2 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
2 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
1 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
1 No Yes No Yes Yes Yes
1 1 No Yes No No No No
1 1 No Yes No No No No •
1 No Yea Yea J_ No No'
.. _
' "
•
. .
City of Tustin
Name of Complex No. & Type of
Units in Co~lex
No. of Interviews Bach. lbr. 2br.13br.
Williamshire 28 56 35
1
2
Tustin Arms 20 80 20
1
-NE-cor. -WTlfiailis& J.b
Alliance
1
Tustin Village #2 {114 uts -1,2,3,4
bedrooms)
1
2
3
Holiday Gardens .l4 L.4
1
2
Mei Ling 68 J.4
1
TABLE III (Continued)
APARlMENl' PARKING SURVEY
October 1968
Type No. of I Parkin~!
Parki~ ' Spaces Unit Pers. Autos
Cov. Qpen Unit. Interviewed in ut. Owned
119 60 1.5
2 bdrm. 3 2
3 bdrm. 4 1
120 60 1.5
2 bdrm. 2 2
J.b J..u
2 bdrm. 3 1
7
3 bdrm. 3 2
2 bdrm. 4 1
3 bdrm. 4 · 2
bU L.b 1.48
2 bdrm. 1 1
2 bdrm. 2 2
Ill :.!4 1.29
2 bdrm. 2 2
2 bdrm. 2 2
3-lbdrm.
32-2bdrm
3-3bdrm.
•
• •
l'~g• 6
Planning Department
Parking Are Sac. Open
Charac. Rent Spaces Space for Guest Spaces
Res _lt. ~ce Conven. addtl. Pkll Available Adecua.
2 No Yes No Yes Yes 1 ~0 No Yes Yes Yes
2 No Yes No Yes No
1 No Yes No Yes Yes
2 No Yes No No No 1 No Yes No No No 2 No Yes No Yes Yes
1 No Yes No Yes No 1 1 No Yes No ·No No
1 1 No Yes No No No 1 1 No v .... .1lo_ _No No
Conclusive evidence could not be obtained by calculating statistics on the apartment developments as a whole either. Complexes with similar
parking spaces per unit and parking spaces per bedroom ratios appear to have differing parking characteriatics. This fact may indicate that
the design of the complex plays a significant role in parking characteriatics.
•
~
Conven
Yes
Yes
No
i
I
Yes
No
Ne
Yes
No
No
No
No
•
...
•
. .
:ity of Tustin
Complex
L. Palmwo od Gardens
----
2 . Rancho Yorba
3. Tustin Acres
-
4. To~~ Center Apts, t ,
5. Win s ton Pk.Gardens
s . Tus tin Square
I-7. Wimb1eton Ha ll
8. 170 62 Carlann Cir.
9. Trinidad Apart. t
LO. Newpo rt Ga1~xie --
l l. TI1e C:ts tilian
-----
L2. The Segovia
-
13. Village West
.4. Williamshire --
.5. Tu stin Anns
b . ::E cor. lolilliams
~ _Al l_i a nc e
.7. Tu Gtin Vil1ang #2
--
. 8. Hvl ll!<t y Gardens
r r
--
9. ~!d Ling
.......
I
. -. ' ..
• lo ..... -._......._... ·-·--··-----------·-....... _
TABL~ IV
APARTMEm' PARKING SURVEY (Continued)
October 1968
Dwelling Units Parking Total Parking Spaces/
Ba ch.• 1 br. 2 br. 3 br. Total Cov. Ooen Total Bedrooms Unit
79 23 102 97 45 142 227 1.39
28 12 40 40 20 60 52 I 1,50
16 16 16 8 . 24 32 1.50
Breakdown not available
1
I
Breakdown not available
34 10 44 44 16 60 S4 1.36
3 1 4 4 2 6 9 1.50
22 32 54 54 27 81 86 1.50
9 48 36 93 93 47 140 213 1.51
92 25 117 121 56 177 142 1.51
48 38 86 86 43 129 124 1.50
52 24 76 76 39 115 100 1.51
I 28 56 35 119 119 60 179 245 1.50
20 80 20 120 120 .60 180 240 1.50
16 I 16 16 16 32 1.00
Breakdown not available
34. 24 58 62 28 90 82 1.55
68 14 82 82 24 106 96 1.29 .
•
~ • •
__ ....
-.
.. ·--· ....... -·--·-.. -~ -----,....... ,
Planning Department \.....__ ...
Parking Spaces
Bedroom ZoninR:
0.63 R-4
1.15 R-3
PO
0.75 R-3
PO
R-3
1.11 R-3 I
0.67 · R-3
0.94 R-3
0.66 100-C-2-20,000 ~
1.25 R-3
1.04 R•3
1.15 R-3
--·----0.73 PD-2700
--0.75 R-3
0.50 R-3
PO • 1.10 R-3
1.10 a-3 --• •
.·
"
•
,.....,
,
1'&&0 8
Conclus ions
It a ppe a r s that a slight increase is warranted for two bedroom units and that increased attention should be given to gueat parking.
Increase s s hould not be made, however, at the expense of needed open space.
Although significant problems exist on both Pa s adena and Tustin Village Way, it would not neceaaarily be advantageous to ban on-
s treet parking in the are a if there are not enough off-street spaces. It can also be argued that the public streeta are designed
to pe rmit on-street parking. Certainly adjacent property owners have a right to utilize auch on-atreet parking unleaa aucb uae
adversely affects the public welfare.
Ba s ed upon our study of parking characteristics in apartment districts, the following standa~J• are augieated.
Type of Unit
Bachelor
One Bedroom
Two Bedroom
Three or More Bedroom
* At least one parking space per unit shall be provided in a garage or carport.
Spaces/Unit*
1
1.5
1. 75
2
In a dd i tion to the above required spaces, a mintmum of one (1) on-site open or covered parking space shall be provided for guest parking
f or e ach te o (10) dwelling units or fraction thereof. Said spaces shall be marked for "guest parking" and the convenience of said apaces
to visit or s s hall be considered by the Architectural Committee when plans are considered for Architectural Review.
4-e~upin g er ~~~ning Director
:rLS/jat
______ _,__
•
•
' • •
__ ...
-.
\._..:
/
•
•
•
0
•
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
via Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
FROM : City Planning & Zoning Commission
SUBJECT: Amendment of Parking Regulations in Residential
Districts
The City Planning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting May
18, 1971, voted 7-0 (two members absent) to recommend repeal
of parking regulations in individual residential districts
and to amend §22.5-Sa(lO) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
to change residential parking requirements as follows:
From:
----One (1) off-street parking space/dwelling unit.
12= Type of Unit . Required Off-Street Parking
Single-Fam1ly DWellings •.••••• TWo (2) spaces/unit
Two or More Family Dwellings
Efficiency Unit ••••••.••• One (1) space/unit
One or Two Bedroom
Units •••••• ~ •••••••• One and one-half (1-1/2}
spaces/unit.
Three or More Bedroom
Units ••••••••••••••• Two (2) spaces/unit
Re•~~tted,
~~S L. SUPINGER ~
Director of Planning
For
City Planning & Zoning Commission
gw
enc : Staff Report dated May 4, 1971
M1nutes of May 4, and May 18.
Rathkopf on Zoning Reprint
Tusti~ California Parking Study
cc: Architects
Developers
Chamber of Commerce
May 21, 1971
,_
\ !
'!
•.
I •
' I
•
,
-
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page :=1~---------------
Staff Rep'?~:
•
0
•
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Case #9-71
Proposed amendment of parking regulations for residential
uses.
Date to be Considered:
May 4, 1971
Name of Applicant:
City of Englewood
Request:
The amendment of §22.5-5 a (10) of the Comprehensive
Zon~ng Ordinance. (Parking regulations for residential uses.)
FROM: One (1) space per dwelling unit
TO: One Family Residential U.nit---Two (2) spaces per unit
Two or More Dwelling Units
Efficiency Unit------------One (1) space per unit.
One or Two Bedroom Units---One and one-half (1 1/2)
spaces per unit.
Three or more Bedroom Units---Two (2) spaces per
unit.
Subject Area:
All Re idential Zone Districts (R-1-A, R-1-B, and R-1-C
Single-family Residential; R-2-A and R-2-B Two-family Residen-
tial; R-3-A and R-3-B Multi -family Residential ; and R-4 Residen-
tial /Professional.)
Backg1ound of Pt·cvious Action:
The 1955 Zoning Ordinance established the present ratio
of one parking space per dwelling unit and the ratio was not
changed with the adoption of the 1963 Ordi nance. Since that
time and particularly in the last several years with the in-
creased apartment house construction and the crowding of streets
in all residential areas---single family zone districts in-
clud~d , there has been cons1derable informal discussion as to
the inadequacy of this ratio. No official action has been
taken unt1l this time.
,_
' I
•
I • •
·' \ l
• ' 1'
1-
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -2-
·.
•
0 -
Pla~nin~ Department Recommendation:
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Case #9-71
It is recommended that §22.5-5 a (10) of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance (parking regulations for residential uses) be
amended as follows:
One Family Residential Unit--------Two (2) spaces per
unit.
Two or more Dwelling Units:
Efficiency Unit------------------One (1) space per
unit.
One or Two Bedroom Units---------One and one-half (1 1/2)
spaces per unit.
Three or More Bedroom Units------Two (2) spaces per
unit.
Comments from Other Departments:
Fire: "Traffic and parking congestion is one of major
concernoy all city departments, but ,probably mor~ especially
the Fir·e Department since we . rely greatly upon the movement
of tire trucks and ladder trucks, and our efficiency depend
to some degree upon the proximity to which we may approach an
emergency.
""The heavy parking cor:gestion and traffic associated with
apartment complex have come to our attention and was part of
the consideration when we recommended and was successful in
the Council having adopted Ordinance #4, Series of 1971 (copy
attached). This does not necessarily regulate the amount of
parking spaces, but it could and does give us the authority to
reduce parking spaces in private parking areas where additional
fire lanes, or ingress is required by emergency vehicles. We
would hope that this would not be necessary around small apart-
ment units.
"We agree that to deal adequately with this parking problem,
the extension of the Ordinance to require additional parking
spaces seP.ms to be a reasonable approach".
Police : The concern of the Police Department is related
to auTos , campers, vans, etc. pat•king on-street too close to
inte sections and driveways, thus causing visibility and turning
problems.
. ,
I • •
'
-
•
•
STAFF REPORT
~~~~--------·
Public Works (Traffic):
parkirig·;-requiremer.ts for new
justification for a change in
for each unit.
•
0
•
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Case #9-71
"The present 'off-street
apartment units have proven
the nwnber of stalls required
"At this time the on-·street parking is being fully utilized in
the lo cale of these buildings, thereby causing complaints from
single family residences.
''1 t is recommended the present requirement of one stall per
unit be raised to 1 1/2 stalls for a one-bedroom unit and 2
stalls fot each larger unit."
Plann j ng Department: Concerns relative to the adequacy
of ofJ-street par·krng in residential areas have been well-
known among the Planning Department staff and the Planning
Commission for some time. Rumors have been circulating for
some time among deve loper·s and Arch i tee ts that the City was
going to increase its off-street parking requirements.
F r om inspection of residential areas the staff has come to the
opinion that the change should be made now rather than waiting
for the complete new zoning ordinance, The proposed change
will base parking on the number of bedrooms in the dwelling
uttit. This has been found to be a successful way of gauging
the amount of parking ·Spaces needed, particularly in multiple
family areas, whrch constitute most of our new residential
construction.
It should be noted that the provision of additional off-street
parking will not ne cessari ly solve the problem of on-street
parking. This problem will only be lessened if off-street
spaces are more convenient for the users than are the on-
street spaces:-AnOrdinance is presently being developed
which will restrict parking near intersections because of
visibility pt•oblcms. On-street parking near driveways has
resulted in drivers having to turn into the driveways from
the wrong lane resulting in a violation.
A11other problem caused by the present massive use of on-s treet
parking is that there is little or no space for parking of
delivery and service vehicles. Consequently, they double park,
Parking p oblems are not unique to Englewood, Denver has
recently c hanged its standard in multiple family areas to 1 1/2
s paces per dwelling unit. Aurora and Littleton are considering
changes as follows:
,_
I I
or
I •
. '
•.
•
'
•
•
0
•
STAFF REPORT
Page ·-4-
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
________________ . .::C:.:a:.::s:.::e~#~9=---_:·7...:1=-------
Aurora
Single Family •••.•••••••••••••••• 2 spaces/dwelling unit
Multiple family
1 & 2 bedroom units ••.•••••.••• l 1/2 spaces/dwelling
unit.
3 bedroom units ••.••..••••••••• 2 spaces/dwelling unit
4. or mor-e bedroom units •••••••• 2 1/2 spaces/dwelling
unit.
Littleton
S1ngle Family ••..•••.•..•••.••••• 2 spaces/dwelling unit
Multiple Family ••.•••..••.•••.••• l 1 /2 spaces/dwelling
unit.
We have been told by several developers that this proposed
change will cause residential devt>lopment to stop and the City
will lose new tax base. Two general answers to this are
appropriate:
1. Residential uses, except 'those of ultra-high value, do not
''pay their way" from a property tax point of view.
2. The city should not be s addled with problems caused by
developments, but should learn from experience and establish
standards wh1ch will not result 1n problems.
The Planning Departmt>nt recommends approval of the proposed up-
graded off-street parking requirements for residential develop-
ments.
Re;;ectfully s~~itted, .
l.t-a ~e-J CJ· r ~ )jJ E~ L SUPINGER 'C ~? ~Di ector of Planning ?7~
cc : Arch l tects
De velopers
Chamber of Commerce
,.....--
. '
•.
I • •
•· \ l
I ' . '
~
•
CITY Qlo' ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
May 18, 1971
I. CALL TO ORDER.
The reguial~mce-ting of the C1ty Planning and Zoning Commission was called
to order by Chatrman Lentsch at 8:05 P. M.
Members Present : Weist ; Senti; Patrick; Mosbarger; Henning; Carlson;
Lentsch
Supinger, Ex-officio
Members absent: Walsh; Lone
Also present : City Attorney Berardini; Assistant Planning Director
Romans.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
May 4-, 1971
Cha1rman Lents c h stated that the Mir.utes of May 4, 1971, were to be
con~1dered for approval.
Mosbarger moved:
Henning seconded: The Minutes of May 4, 1971, be approved as written.
The motion carried unanimously.
I TI. A\lENmlENT OF ZONING ORDINANCE
s ·2·2:-5·:-sa (10)
Re: Pa1k1ng Standards in Resi-
dential Districts.
CASE #9-718
May 4, 1971
April 6, 19.71
Mr . Supinger stated that th1s matter was discussed extensively at the
last me et1ng, and noted that members of the Commission have been given
add1tional infonnation on the matter this even1ng. One part of the in-
formatlon ts a study done in a California City in 1968, which has been
updated, and the second po r t-ion of the additional information is a re-
prtnt of 1nformation from Rathkopf ~of~~
Mr. Supinger stated that he felt higher standards for required parking
are needed. Mr. Sup1nger stated that he felt the City should set parking
sta ndar·ds that are felt to be necessary, and do not accept any develop-
ments that don't meet the local standards.
Mr . Lentsch tated that the Public Hearing 'had been held on this matter,
but discu sion of the proposal to raise the parking standards in resi-
dentJ.al districts has been continued. Mr. Lentsch asked if there were
pet·-s or.s in the aud1ence who w1shed to speak in favor of the proposal?
Mr. E. Fishkin 1511 E. Dartmouth -sta ted that he is an architect, and has done several
d velopments in Aurora, but has not had any projects
in Erglewood. He t at d that he is in favor of increasing the required
number of s pace for off-stteet parking. He stated that the p r oposal is
in line w1th the r qu1r ment of the juri s dictions urrounding Englewood.
Mr. F1shk1n st:~ted th a t he felt more people \\Ould be driving automobiles
unttl a mass-tran ·it yst m 1 a realtty, and that provi lOllS must be
made fo1 the park1n g of th e car-. Mr. Fi hk1n asked if parking spaces
one b hind the o t her wou ld be approved?
•
Mt', Sup1nge r t.lt ed tha t he felt the City would accept "tandem" patking.
M1. Fi :;hk in u gg t ed that on -treet parking be on ide red the "'guest"
pa1 king , and that th tenant all be provided pac off-treet. He
-1-
' '
I
•.
•
• l
•
'
I
I
I
I
I
•
stated that development is sti ll going on in Denver, even though the re-
quired parking standards have been raised, and he didn't feel the proposal
would "kill development" in Englewood as has been suggested, He stated
aga1 n that he was in favor of the proposal, and felt that it was a "wise
proposal". ·
Mr. Be1 ·ardini asked Mr. Fishk1n about the economics of the proposal, and
how 1t would affect development?
~lr. Fishkin stated that the p1·oposal will "eliminate" the type of
devE-loper who wants to put "17 units on 75 ft. frontage", He stated
that if underground parking were required it could well be economically
unfe asible, but that the 1-1 /2 :1 isn't; he stated that developments
meeting these standards could be done economically and be "done right",
Mr. Al Snyder
Alma1• Company
60 S . Lincolr. St. -stated that he has done "research" on the matter in
Englewood, driving through the residential areas at
night, and he agrees that the re is a problem. He stated that the l-1/2:1
is a must, and that it must be done in an orderly way. Mr. Snyder again
qu es t1oned the p1•oposed 1:1 for an "efficiency" unit, and stated that he
felt it too s hould be 1-1/2:1. He further stated that he st1ll felt the
set-back requirements should be given consi~eration, particularly on an
"tnstde lot ''. He suggested 7-l /2 ft. on ea...:h side for such a lot, and
a 10 ft. front setback. He suggested that automobile parking be allowed
in the setbacks. Mr. Snyder stated that he felt the present 25 ft. rear
setback was necessary, and that maneuvering space was needed for the
parkin g provided from the alley, Mr. Snyder stated that he felt the
proposal will be a good thtng, and will help defer a serious parking
problem in the City of Engle"ood, He urged that something be done
"1mmediately", declaring an emergency ordinance or a moratorium on fur-
ther development until the parking requirements are finalized,
Mr. Chalmerse Parker
3996 South Grant St. -suggested that the efficiency units be required
to provide 1-1 /2:1 parking as the one and two
bedroom apartments will be. M1·. Parker stated that he was in favor of
a '"defl.nite cut-off date", and that all apartments built after that date
meet the standards regardless of how long the developer has owned the
lot.
Mr . Lentsch asked if there were other persons who wished to speak in
favor of the proposal? No one indicated they wished to speak.
Mr. Ler.tsch asked · if there we1 ·e persons who wished to spea k in opposition
to the propo s al?
Mr. M. M. Summers
3140 s. Delaware -asked if th is applied to both apartment houses, and
si n g le-famil y reside ntial uses?
Mr. Lentsch repl1ed that the p1·oposal would apply to all residenti al dis-
trlcts, but only for new construction.
Mr . Summers stated that he was opposed to the proposa l as it applied to
the si n gle-family residential uses; as for the applicat i on of the pro-
posal to the apartment houses, he stated that he would leave that up to
the Commtssion and the City Council.
Mrs. Henning a s ked if the proposal, if passed by Council, would become
effective immediately, or if there would be a delay until it becomes
effect1vc? Mr. Be ardini s tat ed that if an emergency clause is enacted,
the ordinance will become final upon publication after second reading.
1 f there i s no emergency clause, the ordinance becomes effective 30 days
afte publication follo"ing second reading. Discussion followed.
-2-
•
•
•
I • •
·' '
I
\
\
•
•
Henning moved:
Mosba1·ger seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council
that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinar.ce, §22.5-5a(l0)
be amended to require off-street parking spaces be provided . in residential
distr1cts as follows:
FROM: One (1) off-street parktng space/dwelling unit.
TO:
Type of Unit Required Off-~_treet Parking
S1ngle-Family Dwellings ••.•••..••••• Two (2) spaces/unit
Two or More Family Dwellings:
Effie iency Unit .•••.••.•.••••• ,One (1) space/unit
One or Two Bedroom Units ••.•••• Or.e and one-half (1-1/2) spaces/unit
Three or More Bedroom Units •••• Two (2) spaces/unit.
The motion carried ur.animously.
IV. AMENDMENT OF ZONING ORDINANCE
922:-s~·---------
Re: Service Stations
CASE #8-718 xra-y 4, 1971
April 6, 1971
Fire Chief William Hamilton was present for the discussion.
Chief Hamilton stated that after meeting with Mr. Kramer of the Er.glewood
Public Schools, and Mr. Supinger, it was dectded that the restriction
should be raised to 600 ft. between a service stat1on and a playground
or school. He r.oted that w1th Performance Standards, that a service
station could be located closer than the 600 ft. Chief Ham1lton stated
that just to eliminate the Ordinance might be a mistake on the part of
the City, and that he felt the present controls did contribute to public
safety.
Chief Ham1lton noted that the City now allows deliveries of 9,000 gallons
of gasolir.e per delivery; he stated that he felt the enti1·e Ordinance
should be •·s t rengther.ed".
Mr. Patr1ck asked if storage of gasoline was considered the same as
filling stations? Chief Hamiltor. replied that it was.
Mr. Ca1·lson asked if the "leeway for negotiation" was legal? He noted
that a service station that might be closer than the 600 ft. as proposed
might have an underground tank that would leak, and might endanger the
school by seepage of the gasoline underground.
Mr. Berardini stated that he felt the negotiation leeway would be per-
mitted. He asked how the 500 ft. rule came about in the first place?
Chief Hamilton replied that he didn't really know. Discussion followed.
Chief Hamil ton stated that the p1·esent method of storage of gas under-
ground presented l1ttle or no hazard, except in the case of an under-
ground tank l ea king: however, he also pointed out that the LPG storage
next to schools could jeopardize the school, in that liquid gases above
ground were haza1~ous, and could travel at ground level in vapor clouds.
Mr. Berard1 ni asked if the same standards that would apply to schools in
the location of service stations should apply to hospltals, auditoriums,
etc? Chtef Hamilton stated that the standards could very well apply to
the se usPs, and include churches and other uses which attract large con-
ce ntrations of prople at one time. Discussion followed.
Mr. S. R. Andrews
Real Estate Represe ntative
Continental Oil Company -stated he felt the restriction of service
stations near schools and playgrounds is
"emotiona lly" ba se d. lie asked what would happen to service stations
-3-
. '
I • •
.• I !
' .,.
• ,._
that are now 500 ft. from a school and playground if the suggested 600
ft. distance is approved? Mr. Andrews asked how the distance was measured,
and s u ggeste d that a definition of the method of measurement be included
in the O•dinance. lie also s ug gested that the Ordinance include, in
addition to storage mode, the ca pacity, aPd the manner in which the
product is to be dispensed, He uoted that some of the biggest risks are
in the way the gas 1s dispensed to th e private automobile. He stated
that he questioned wh et h er or not the restriction between service stations
and sc hool s and playgrounds is needed. He stated that they have a
service station lo ca ted on a corner of the school lot in Fort Collins,
and they have bad no problems whatsoever.
Mr. Chalmerse Parker stated that the 500 ft. rule was devised by the
City in an eftort to curb the rapid expansion of the service stations;
he stated that the service stations were buying up so much of the land
that City offictals feared it would r educe the ad valorem taxes in the
City. Mr. Parke c stated that "health, safety, and welfare was used as a
gimmick to pa ss the ordinance".
David Clayton
4509 South Acoma -stated that there have been cases in the City of
Englewood, as •ell as in Littleton, where u~derground
tanks leaked and three adjointng residences had to be evacuated.
Discussion followed.
Henning moved:
Senti seconded: The Planning Commission defer action on amending the
Comprehenstve Zoning Ordinance §22.5-3(f) restricting
the location of service s tattons closer than 500 ft. to a school or
playground. The Conuniss1on re qu est s the City Attorney, Planning Director,
and Fire Chtef to furnish information on tmprovement of "s afety" standards
in other existing City Codes and Ordtnances.
The motion carried.
V. FIRE /POLICE COMPLEX
Mr. Wm. McDivitt and Mr. Larry Bourne were present for this discussion,
as were Fire Chief Hamilton and Police Chief Clasby.
Mr. McDivitt opened the discussion by revtewing the background on this
Complex. Od g 1nally, the new site was to be a replacement for Fire
Station :il only, but after considering the proposal, it was determined
that the structure at Girard Avenue and South Bannock Street was inadequate
for the Police Department. Thus, the Fi re/Police Communications Complex
came about. Mr. Mc Divitt sta t e d ~1at trips by City Offtcials and Mr.
Bourne to va ious points of th<:> country to view similar complexes was
helpful in the ultimate destgn of the Complex. Mr. McDivitt stated
that bids were to be let and opened during June, and ~hat construction,
hopefully, wtll begin by the e~d of August, with the completion date
set for May of 1972.
Mr. Bourne displayed a model of the proposed Complex; he pointed out that
there is ve y little window area to the outside--an attempt to make the
building as ''secu•·e" as possible. The structure will be masonry and
brick. ~tr . Bourne stated that the entire com plex will l)ave 29,800 sq.
ft.: there wi ll be four jail cel ls, and four interrogation offices
which could bo used as holding cells.
~h·. Lentsch asked what expansion of the two departments could be accommo-
dated by the 13uildtng? Chief Cla sby stated that this would give the
Police Dcpat·tment factlities to accommodate a 50';;, expansion; he also
noted that the jail facilities were only for the inv estigative process,
and would not be used for "long term committmcnts". Chief Clasby noted
that the total comm unications operations for the City would be housed in
-4-
• .• \ !
'!
I •
. .
•
'
•
•
this structure, and that it is imperative that proper security be pro-
v~ded for this equipment.· Chief Clasby also stated that there have been
some fire bombings of police facilities in the Denver area.
Chief Hamilton stated that the new facility will accommodate the rescue
unit, one pumper and the snorkle, and the new pumper when it arrives.
Mr. Bourne stated there would be five "bays", four for pumpers, and one
for the snorkle.
Parking facilities were di scussed. Mr. Mosbarger stated that he felt
there should be accommodations for two crews. Discussion followed.
Mr. Lentsch extended the appreciation of the Commission to Messrs. Bourne
and McDivitt, and to Chief Ha milton and Chief Clasby.
VI. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE
Mr. Sup1nger reminded members of the dinner meeting May 20, 1971, of the
Planning Conunissions from jurisdictions within Arapahoe County. The
dinner meeting is 6:30 P.M. at Guespato Cristofolo Chiacchierone. Mr.
Dial is the guest speaker.
VII. Cm!MISSION'S CHOICE
Mr. Patrick presented maps and information on parking areas in the down-
town area, most specifically those ~vailab~c to the 3400 block of Lincoln,
Broadway, and Acoma. Mr. Patrick pointed out that these par-king lots are
privately owned, and could be eliminated at any time the owners so chose.
Mr. Patrick stated that the merchants on Broadway are concerned, and
that Mr. Holthaus, owner of Lot #1 on South Acoma, has stated his de-
sire to fence that lot and charge $.50 parking fees. Mr. Patrick stated
he has dis c us se d the matter with several of the merchants in the 3400
block, with members of the Planning Department staff, and with members
of the Planning Commission, in an effort to find a way to secure these
parking lots permanently for the downtown area.
Mrs. Henning asked if the City were paying the property owcers for the
use of their property as parking lots? Mr. Patrick replied that the
City is not; there is an association of merchants which collects money
from the individual merchants in payment for use of the parking lots.
Mr. Patrick stated that property which ~!r, Holthaus owns on Acoma re-
quired 23,868 sq. ft. of parking area, and the parking lot which Mr.
Holthaus is providing is 31,462 sq. ft. Discussion followed. Mr. Patrick
stated that the Zoning Ordinance requires that parking be provided, but
does not say whether or not the parking lot may be fenced, and a fee
charged for parking. Further discussion followed. Mr. Lentsch stated
that development or redevelopment of the downtown area cannot be expected
until permanent parking is assut·ed. It was suggested th·at possibly the
City should subsidize the parking if the area is to develop. Ways and
means of financing the purchase of land for parking in the downtown area
were considered. Mrs. Romans pointed out that a "parking district" had
been attempted two or three times before, and has failed to gain sufficient
support from land-owners and businessmen. Mr. Lentsch suggested that per-
haps the "occupational tax" should be reinstated, and the funds from
such tax used for parking downtown, covering Little Dry Creek, etc.
Mrs. Hennin g sugges ted that there were other problems downtown than
just the parking. She note d that the access to the stores from the
parking lots at the rear is extremely poor, and asked that the business-
men co n si der improvi n g this access to the stores. Mrs. Henning also
su g gested that perhaps monies sh ould be allocated in the public improve-
ment budget fo the purchase of land for parking. Discussion followed,
Mr . Supinger tated that he had discussed the improvement of the core
area w1th a f ew consu ltants that have indicated interest in the project
after the initial ontnct. Mr. Supinger stated he •ould like to know
11hat is happening with the Englewood Square project. Mr. Lentsch stated
that h e didn't think any progress would be made; that the project seems
to be sta l em ated, Discussion followed. Mr. Supinger stated that he had
-5-
•.
I • •
·' \ !
' f
'f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l
I
•
•
contacted the Disney Corporation to see if they would be interested in
doing a study of the core area, but the Corporation had other commitments
and could not undertake this project. Mrs. Romans commented that several
consultants have done studies of the core area, among them Or. Crampon,
Larry Smith, and Jim Small, whose study was completed in 1964, There
have been numerous staff studies of the area. Discussion followed. Mr.
Carlson suggested that the Chamber of Commerce could check into the
possibility of consulting firms doing a study in the downtown area.
Mr. Lentsch asked that Mr. Patrick discuss the matter of the parking lots
further with the downtown merchants, and report back to the Commission,
Mr. Lentsch asked the Planning Director to report back to the Commission
on the Martin-Marietta Company parking lot.
The Bus Tour of May 8th was discussed, Mrs. Henning stated that she felt
the tour was very educational.
Mrs. Henning stated that she understood there was to be a meeting May 24th
on Storm Sewers. Discussion followed. Mr. Lentsch asked that the
Planning Commission be notified if the meeting on the storm sewers was
open to the public,
The meeting adjourned at 10:50 P.M.
--
-6-
. , •
. '
•.
I • •
0
•' \ I
I f ,.
]
•
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOM-
MENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
DATE: May 18, 1971
SUBJECT: Amendment of Zon i ng Ordinance: §22.5-5a(l0)
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council
that the Compre hensive Zoning Ordinance, §22.5-5a(l0)
be amended to r equi r e off-street parking spaces be provided in residential
districts as follows:
FROM: One (1) off-street parking space/dwelling unit.
TO: Required Off-Street Parking Type of Unit
Single-Family Dwellings •••••..•••••• Two(2) spaces/unit
Two or more Family Dwellings:
Efficiency Unit ••••••••••••••.• One (1) space/unit
One or Two Bedroom Units ••••••• One and one-half (1-1/2) spaces/unit
Three or More Bedroom Units •••• Two (2) -;;paces/unit.
The motion carried unanimously.
Respectfully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission.
~£-dv:f-hr-ECORDING SECRETAR
-7-
. , •
'I ..
I • •
0
.• I I
•
,
"
]
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING OOMMISSION
MAY 4, 1971
I. CALL 1U ORDER.
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was
ca lled to order at 8:00 P. M. by Chairman Lentsch.
Members present: Walsh; Patrick; Mosbarger; Lone; Lents h; Henning;
Carlson
Supinger, Ex-officio
Members absent: Weist; Senti
Also present: City Attorney Berardini; Assistant Planning Director
Romans; Planning Assistant Wardlaw
I I. APPR OVAL OF MINUTES.
April 20,1971
Mr . Lentsch stated that the Minutes of April 20, 1971, were to be con-
sidered for approval.
Carlson moved:
Lone seconded: The Minutes of April 20, ~Q71, be approved as written.
The motion carried.
III. AMENDMENT OF ZONING ORDINANCE
Repeal of ~2.5-3(f)
Re: Filling Stations
Henning moved:
Lone seconded : The Public Hearing be opened.
CASE #8-71
Mr. Senti entered the meeting and assumed his chair with the Commission.
Mr. Lentsch called for the ·vote on the motion; the motion carried.
Mr. Lentsch asked Mr. Supinger to give the background of this matter.
Mr. Weist entered and assumed his chair with the Commission.
Mr. Supinger noted that in 1967, the City Attorney's office had submitted
an opinion that the restriction was unenforceable, and was discriminatory
in nature. Mr. Supinger noted that the Commission was given earlier in
the evening, a revised report from Fire Chief Hamilton, and a copy of a
report contained in the Planning Advisory Service from ASPO. Mr.
Supin ge r stated that in light of additional information, the staff was
no longe r seeking the repeal of the entire section, but rather the re-
peal of the last portion, which reads: "nor within five hundred (500)
feet of an existing filling station property line." ~tr . Supinger
stated that a revision to the section, setting forth "performance stan-
dards" mi g ht enable a service station to be located near a school, but
that the revision has not been prepared, and the staff feels at the
present time the repeal of the last portion of the present section is
sufficient.
-1-
. , .• I I
1
I •
,
• <
•
•
•
•
Mr. Lone asked if it would be possible for a gasoline storage tank, sale
of gasoli ne, etc. to be Jocated nearer than the 500 ft. limitation to a
school if it were an "accessory use"? Mr. Berardini replied that it
would be, the way the Ordinance is written at the present time. Mr.
Lone stated that he felt the Conmlission should be concerned with that
problem---not just the service stations, but the s ale of gasolin~ and
storage of gas oline whether as a permitted use or as an accessory use.
Discussion followed. Mr. Lentsch asked if me mbers in the audience
wished to speak on the matter?
•
Mr. John Kramer, Manager
Property Services
Englewood School District -stated he was concerned about the repeal of
the entire section. Mr. Kramer stated that
he felt this was directly concerned with the welfare of the children
attending the schools, and of the schools themselves. He stated that he
had discussed the matter with Fire Chief Hamilton and Mr. Supinge~, and
he would agree with the repeal of the last portion of the section re-
lating to the 500 ft. limit between service station property lines Mr.
Kramer stated he felt the entire section should be rewritten.
Mr. George Partridge, representative
of Skelley Oil Company -asked why the restriction was placed against
the business of ·~ervice stations and filling
stations" and not against the businesses who dispense gasoline etc. as
an accessory use. He stated that the Ordinance as written discriminates
against the service stations and constitutes a restraint of trade. He
stated that he d o esn't feel this would create a fire or traffic hazards,
and cited statistics which show that fires per 100 buildings rates
service stations at 1.65, garages at 26.17, restaurants at 6.29, etc.
He noted that customers usually purchase gasoline and oil either on their
way to work, or on their way home; people do not "shop" for gasoline ·
products as they do for groceries, clothing, etc. Mr. Partridge re-
quested the Commission to recommend to City Council that the Ordinance
be repealed.
The Commission asked Mr. Partridge if he would approve the repeal of
the last section only, which would allow service stations closer than
500 ft. to other service station property lines? Mr. Partridge stated
that he would approve the repeal of only that section at this time.
Discussion followed.
Walsh moved:
Henning seconded ·: The public hearing· be closed.
The motion carried unanimously.
Further discussion followed.
Henning moved:
Lone seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that
§22.5-3(f) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance be
amended by repealing the following portion of that section: " ••• nor
within five hundred (500) feet of an existing filling station property
line."
The motion carried unanimously.
Discussion ensued. Mr. Lone suggested that perhaps further amendment
sh ould read that "no filling station or accessory use which sells gaso-
line product s be allowed wit hin 500 ft." Discussion followed. Mr.
Supinge r stated that there was one situation where a filling station is
to be placed within 500' of another service station, and that any delay
in the ef fe tive date of the Ordinance will, of course, affect these plans.
-2-
'I
I • •
f
-
•
•
•
Mr. Berardini asked if it would be helpful to the Commission to have
further information, particularly from Fire Chief Hamilton in regard to
his memorandum of May 3rd, and to get into the reasons the 500 ft. rule
was instituted in the first place.
It was determined that the matter will be further discussed at tl1e next
reg ular meeting, and Mr. Lentsch a s ked that Fire Chief Hamilton be present
for this discussion.
IV. AMENDMENT OF ZONING ORDINANCE
§22. 5-5a (10)
Re: Parking Standards in Resi-
dential Districts,
Patrick moved:
Mosbarger seconded: The Public Hearing be opened.
The motion carried unanimously,
Mr. Lentsch asked for the background on this hearing,
CASE #9-71
Mr. Supinger stated that this Public Hearing relates to parking require-
ments as given in the Compr~ensive Zoning Ordinance for residential
uses. At the present time, private off-street parking is required one
space per unit in all residential distric ;~. The staff is proposing,
however, that the standards be raised to the following:
One Family Residential Unit •••••••.••••••••••••••• Two spaces/unit
•
Two or More Dwelling Units:
Efficiency Unit •.•.••...•••••••••.•••..•..••• One space/unit
One or Two Bedroom Units ..................... One and one-half
space/unit
Three or More Bedroom Units ••..••••••••.••••• Two spaces/unit
Mr. Supinger stated that slides have been taken of the parking problems
existing in the single-family districts, two-family districts, and in
the multi-family districts. Mr. Supinger commented that commercial and
industrial districts are required to provide adequate off-street parking
for their use, and it is felt that residential uses should do the same.
The slides of the parking problems were shown the Commission, t
Mrs. Henning asked the average width of the residential streets. Mrs.
Romans stated that they were 34 ft. to 36 ft. width.
Mr. Lentsch asked for pers ons in favor of the proposal to speak.
Robert Reynolds
3674 South Hudson -stated he was a local architect, and would like to
see provisions made for "low-cost housing". He
stated that he has been involved in some low-cost housing projects, and
that the stringent parking requirements still apply, even though these
people may not have a car. He noted that the low-cost housing project
location is quite detailed, and that one item that must be considered is
the proximity of public transportation; he questioned why, if the site
for the low-cost housing were close to public transportation, and a
number of the people in this type of housing were not automobile owners,
the parking requirements of 1-1/2 per unit still applied? He stated
that he felt an amendment which would take these facts into consideration
and make prov ision s for the low-cost housing and required parking for
s uch development would be a "very realistic amendment",
-3-
. ,
I • •
I
,
'!
-
\
l
•
•
•
Mr. Al Snyder
Almar Company
60 S. Lincoln St. -stated he was a developer in Englewood. Mr. Snyder
stated t hat he would have to go along with the parking
requi t·eme n ts, but questioned the economic feasi bi li ty of the proposa 1.
~l r . Snyder asked what the sta ff termed an "efficienc y" apartment? He
noted that he could build such apar tments large enough for two p eo ple,
and both would probably have a car , which will still add cars to those
parked o n t h e streets . lie st ated that he felt most developers would
take this route rather than face the financial probl ems of providing the
1-1/2 to 2 spaces proposed for multi-family developments. Mr. Snyder
stated h e felt that some method of enforcement would have to be instituted
to ensure that persons who have a space provided for them off-street
make use of it. Mr . Snyder suggested restricting parking by time, and
to one side of the stree t as means of providing enforcement. Mr. Snyder
pointe d out that the proposed parking requirements, if approved, will
eliminate numerous apartment units that cannot be classified as "luxury"
uni ts, simp ly because the developers cannot financially afford to pro-
vide the e xtra parking and keep the rental within means of the average
employed per s on. Mr. Snyder indicated that providing underground parking
would be completely unfeasible for the developers of these units because
of the expense involved.
Mr. Lone a ske d Mr. Snyder if the lenders h~ has worked with are putting
requirements for off-street parking heavi~~ than the 1:1 ratio that is
presently in effect in Englewood? Mr. Snyder stated that he has never
been faced with such a stipulation. Mr. Berardini asked Mr. Snyder
what the banking institutions require to get financing for a project
such as an apartment house? Mr. Snyder stated that 1:1 parking ratio
is s u ffic i en t, and they require that the project meet the codes of the
municipa li ty where it will be built.
•
T. W. Anderson
35 Martin Lane -stated that he has developed quite a bit of residential
land in Englewood, both ingle -family and multi-family
uses. He noted that Englewood is limited as far as available residential
land, and that if the proposed parking standards are approved, to pro-
vide 1-1/2 spaces per unit would require 30% more ground, and the costs
would have to be "passed on to the tenant". Mr. Anderson stated that he
felt the 1:1 requirement was sufficient for both "efficiency" units and
one-bedroom units. He commented that his firm doesn't build many two-
bedroom units. Mr. Anderson noted that his firm was considering another
development in Englewood, and while they would try to comply with the
propos e d parking standards, if approved, they couldn't comply 100%. He
also noted that the set-back requirements in Englewood are much "tougher
than in Denver".· Mr. Ander·son urged 'theCommission to study the proposal
very seriously, noting that it was "easy to put regulations on", but
difficult to remove them.
Rich Diechmann
Shie ld Realty -stated that he was neither for nor against the proposal.
He questioned the economics if the proposal were approved.
He noted that the cost of the land and development could not be re-
captured in the rental of the units. Mr. Diechmann stated that the Com-
mission must consider the future growth of the City of Englewood, and
a s ked if they wanted to continue the development of Englewood now, or
have it stymied by the increase i n parking requirements for apartment
houses . Mr . Die hmann discussed the grou nd cost ratio, and stated that
developers preferred the ratio of $1,000 to $1,200 per unit, rather than
the $1,500 to $1,900 they are paying now, and with the increased parking
requirements the g round cost ratio will rise to $2,700 to $2,800 per
utd t . ~l t'. Diechmann stated that this could not be recovered through the
rental s , and the developers just will not come to Englewood under these
co ndi ti.ons . .lr. Di ec hmann noted that there are many old homes in Engle-
wood, but they are p1·iced "to what the gro und is worth for multi-family
deve lo pment"; he felt if thi continued, it would "price the developers
-4-
•
.• \ I
'f
I • •
'
-
•
•
•
•
out of lhe ma1·ke t". Mr. Diechmann stated that the incrca.sed parking
requirE:me nts will "detract from the desirability ofEnglewood" for
d e v e l o pers. Mr. Diechmann agreed that the parking increase is need e d,
but the City should consider the economi cs and growth of the City.
Mr . Le ntsch asked Mr. Di ec hmann where theCity would get the extr~
parking if th e d e v e lopers aren't required to provide it?
Mr . Diechmann stated it came down to a matter of declining areas and
economics vs. p arki ng and traffic problems. He asked which would be
satisfied first, the parking and traffic, or the econo mics.
Mr. Al Snyde r stated h e felt the City should work along other lines to
enforce off-street parking rather than requiring additional parking to
be provided---the City s hould work on the "street parking". He stated
he felt the proposal neede d "more consideration".
Lone moved:
Henning seconded : The Public Hearing be closed.
The motioncat·ried unanimously.
Lon e moved:
Patrick se c onded: The matter be tabled for further cor.sidera tion.
The motion carried, Mrs. Henning and Dr. Walsh opposing.
Discussion followed.
,_
VI. USE NOT MENT IONED
Dog Ke i1 ne fin--y.::-2"
Zone District.
C.\SE #10-71
Mr. Supinger stated that Mrs. Gladys Neece and Mr. John Kochis, appli-
cants, want to have a dog kennel at 1860 West Dartmouth Avenue. They
will have Greyhounds, and Pekinese and Poodle dogs. Mr. Supinger noted
that a dog kennel is not listed as a p ermit ted use in any zone di s trict.
He noted that in October, 1970, a request for a dog kennel by Mr. and
Mrs. Harrington was approved by the Commission. Mr. and Mrs. Harrington
had indicated that they wanted a place to keep their "pet" Cocker
Spaniels, and that they did not plan to have more than 10 adult dogs
at any time. They would be selling a few puppies each year. Mr.
Supinger stated that he felt the application by the Harrington's was
for a "hobby" kennel, but that this application by Mrs. Neece and Mr.
Kochis was very definitely for a "commercial" kennel. Mr. Supinger
r.oted that the staff report on the ma ·tter was prepared and sent to the
Commission prior to receipt of additional information, including the
letter from Mr. Negri, and as a result of this, the recommerrl a tion of
the staff has b ee n modified.
Mr. Lentsch aske d persons in favor of the request to speak.
Mr s . Neece stated she was an applicant for permission to have a dog
kennel at 1860 Wes t Dartmouth Avenue. She stated that she was the real
estate agent for the Harrington's last year when they applied for per-
mission to h ave a k ennel at this location. She stated that she knew
the Har r ington's plann ed to have a grooming parlor installed, and that
they wu ••l d se1 1 puppies, so she didn't f e el it was a "h ob by" l<ennel •
'l t·.s . N!:!<:c e n.Jt<!d that at th e time of the first app1 ication fo r a kennel,
~.l r ·. L:~ri, r:.wnct• of la nd intrned iat e ly to the e as t of th e subjec t p rope rty,
indicate d that he was not opposed to the propos e d use. Now, how e ver,
M~. ~eg rt has written to the Planning Director opposing the use of the
la~d fo~ a k ec nel, and has stated in that letter that he ha s ''mor~l
L'(.Serva ttoLs " abo ut the raising of Gre yhounds, and the methods of dis-
posi Lg of pups and c on-•in n ers. Mrs. Neece noted that she has never
p u t do &s ··to ::; 1 ee p ", and that there is a demand f or the Grey h ounds.
-5-
•.
I • •
•' \ I
I •
'f
•
•
•
Mr s . Nee ce further not e d that the raisers of Greyhounds "don't throw
liv e rabbits into th e pens for the Greyhounds, but take them out into a
lat·gt! fi eld and turn the rabbit loo s e." Mrs. Neece noted that raising
good dogs is a lucrative business. She also stated that Mr. Negri was
"di::;cdmlualing against" her by opposing this kennel. Mrs. Neece.
stated th a t it was a rule that all members of the Colorado Breeders
Associati o n canno t race a dog that is bred and born in another state--
th ey must b a Co lorado dugs. Mrs. Ne ece noted that the kenn e l for the
Gre yhound s is an empty trailer house with crates already in it to accom-
modate 22 of th e dogs, although she didn't think she would ever have
that many of th e Greyhounds. Mrs. Neece noted that the workshop on the
s outh end of the res idence would be finished for the Pekes and Poodles--
about 20 Pekes and 6 Poodles, all adults. She would raise puppies from
these dogs. She note d that the dogs she would sell would supplement her
small income, and that the small dogs have been a "hobby" of hers for
many years. Mrs. Neece stated that Mr. Negri has tried to purchase the
property at 1860 West Dartmouth for several years, and she feels he is
opposing h a r request in an attempt to get the property.
•
Mr. Lentsch asked Mrs. Neece if she has purchased the property or has
an option to purchase? Mrs. Neece stated that the purchase of the pro-
pet·ty would "close" Friday. Mr. Lentsch asked if she purchased dog
licenses for the dogs in the kennels? He noted that every citizen of
Englewood had to purchase a license for th~ir dogs. Mrs. Neece stated
that the only license she purchases is a b:ate license for the business.
Discussion followed. Mrs. Henning asked about the use of the residence
as a residence in the I-2 Zone District? Mr. Supinger stated that if
the primary use was residential, that the use must cease in 1977, but
if the primary use was as a kennel and the residence was used for a
"caretaktr'', then the use of the residence could continue indefinitely.
Further discussion followed. Mrs. Neece noted that the Greyhounds were
a quiet dog, and were noisy only when they heard a siren, or when they
were fed.
Mr. Lents c h asked if there were any one present who wished to speak in
opposition?
Mr. Dwight Zwick
3707 Cherry Creek North Drive -stated he represented Mr. Saul Davidson,
owner of property to the west, south and
east of the subject property. Mr. Davidson is opposed to the use of
the land as a kennel. Mr. Zwick noted that Mr. Davidson stated he would
not be as · strongly opposed were it to be an aesthetically-constructed
kennel in conjunction with a veterinary clinic, but the proposal is for
an empty trailer ·and use of the existing residence. Mr~ Zwick stated
that his client has offered to indemnify Mrs. Neece against any loss she
might sustain in not realizing the proposed kennel, and that they have
offered to help Mrs. Neece find a more suitable location for the kennel.
Dr. Walsh a s ked if Mr. Davidson's objection was based on assumption
that the k e nn e l would have an affect on the land value? Mr. Zwick
stated that Mr. David s on has owned the land since prior to the 1965
flood aud would like to develop the property as soon as the Chatfield
Dam is c on s truct e d. He pointed out that the trailer Mrs. Neece is
propo si ng to house the Greyhounds in is worth nothing, and that the
residence is worth very little •
Mr. Lent s c h asked what the plans of the Planning Department we re for this
p ro pe rty i u th e future--would it be indu s trial, res idential, or what?
~1r. Suping er s tat e d that the Compreh .:!nsive Plan shows this p.·operty to be
i nd u a tr1al, and pointed out that the kennel, if approved by the Com-
mis::>io n, wou ld 1·emai n; howe ver, he stated that he felt the pt·oper loca-
tion and zo ni ::g for a k e nnel wa s an agricultural area and agricultural
ZODlllg.
-6-
.• I !
'r
I
• l
•.
• •
'
-
•
•
• ,._
Mr. Derardini qu es tioned Mr. Zwick on his stateme nt that his client
would indemnify M1s . •ecce against los ? ~lr. Zwick stated. that they
would purchase lhe ],lnd , and that Mrs . Neece would make a $1,000 profit.
~lr. Er·JaJ ·d ini a:;ked if thts was a wri tte n agreement? Mr. Zwick s tated
that it vas not,.but that he would be wil ling to sign such an agreemen t
at any rime. ~l•·s . Neec e stated th a t this proposal was completely ·un-
acceptabl e to her . Fllrth e r di scuss ion followed.
Ca t•l son mo ve d:
Henning s e conded: Th e r eques t of Mrs . Gladys Neece and Mr. John Kochis
for a k e nnel at 1860 Wes t Dartmouth Avenue be denied
for the followin g rea:;o ns:
(1) Th e Commi ss ion c annot so::e that the proposal will b e an improvement
as far as buildings and gener al co ndit i o~s are concerced over what is in
existance on the property at the pres e nt time.
(2) There ne e ds to be additi onal research done on this matter to deter-
mine the proper z one ~lassif 1cation and location for a k e nnel such as
has been proposed by Mrs. Neece.
Further dis c ussion followed. Dr. Walsh noted that at one time, this
area under consideration was intensely agricultural, and asked why it
was not so zoned when it was a n n exed to the City? Mrs. Romans stated
that the City official s at the time felt that there weren't individual
ownerships of a s ize to accommodate agricultural usage, and furthermore,
the land being in close proximity to the r ilroad, that it was proper
that the l a nd be zoned for industry .. Di s cussion ensued.
The vote on the motion to deny was called. The motion carried unanimously.
Mrs. NC'ece asked if th e objection of th e Commission was due to the fact
she wa nted to raise and sell Greyhounds? She asked if th e objection
would still stand if she had just the small dogs?
Th e Commission indicated that the obj ection was to the total request.
VI. A~IENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE
92-2. 5-Sa rt~
Resi dential Parking Standards
CASE #9-71
The matter of the parking ratios was again discussed. Mr. Supinger
stated that h e didn't feel the decision s hould be based on a matter of
economics alone, and he wasn't convinced that additional research of the
problem was n eeded . He s tat e d that it was a matter of the Commission's
deciding whether they wa nt e d to up-g rad e th e parking so that it meets
the n eed with the possi bility that development will be slowed down for
a period of tim e,. ot• wheth er the CoJTUnission wanted to e11:cou r age develop-
ment with the ensuin g price of insufficient parking. Mr. Supinger
stated that if the Commission felt they did need additional information
that the staff would be glad to provide same. Further brief discussion
followed.
Henning moved:
Lone seconded: The matter b e raised from the table.
The motion carried unanimous ly.
Mrs. Henning aslwd if matters s u c h as set-ba c k requirements, lot cover-
age, etc. were under conside ration in th e t·evision of the Comprehe n si ve
Zoning Ordinancl!? ~It·. Supinger stated that changes are be:ing considered
in all ar0as of the Ordinance. He stated that the staff is attempting
to put standards in the Ordinance which will allow developers a flexi-
bili t y in design , etc . Di s ussion followed. Mr. Len tsch commented that
th e ~esiden ts of the a~ as in ~hich apart me nt houses have been built were
no t iu att e ndance to g ive their opinion on the question. He also com-
men t ed th .tt un l ess ex tra p:n·l<ing spaces wet·e provided, the cars couldn't
I.J <~ ~o rt e n o JJ the st1·ee t s anyho~. Dt·. Wals h agt·eed this is a k y point
in the ma lte t·, and also a!;t·ce d that an enforceme nt progt·am is n ee ded.
-7-
• <
•.
I • •
\ !
I f
-
•
•
Mr. Snyder stated that he was definite ly concerned with the problem,
and wa nts to work with the city in s olving it. He suggested a meeting
of th e developers ~i lh the Planni••l~ Commission to sec if solutions can
be fou~d . Mr. Snyder pointed out that he has many developments in
Englew ood, and that he has a lot to lose if the correct solutions aren't
found. Mr. Snyde r stated that there wasn't too much area in Engicwood
available for apartment d evelopment , and stated that he didn't feel the
City would b e faced with a "big problem in the future".
Mr. Supinger commen ted ~1at there had been a Committee of real estate
agents, etc. who had worked with the staff for a time on the revision
of the Compre h ensive Zoning Ordinance, and this Committee had approved
and urged the proposed parking ratio of 1-1/2 to 1 as a minimum in the
multi-family districts. Mr. Supinger stated that Mr. Diechmann was a
member of that Committee. Discussion followed. Mr. Weist asked if it
would be proper to consider a change in the parking restrictions on-
street as has been suggested? Mr. Supinger stated that he felt it
might be proper for theCommission to suggest to City Council such a
step be taken, but pointed out that the Traffic Department will be in
charge of preparing the Ordinances, etc. Further discussion followed.
Mr. Le ntsch commented that he felt apartment house development penalizes
single-family developments, and that the single-family uses have to
suffer for the apartment developers actions.
Gerald Stryka
Moore Realty -discussed the economics of the proposal. He urged that
the parking ratio be retained at 1:1.
Discussion followed.
Henning moved:
Mosbarger seconded: Discussion of the matter be continued to the next
regular meeting of the Commission on May 18th.
The motion carried unanimously.
VII. ENVIRONMENT.4L HOUSING CONFERENCE
May 17, 1971-:. Cosmopolitan
Hotel --Silver Glade Room
Members of the Commission who indicated they would attend this con-
ference were: Mrs. Henning, Messrs. Senti, Mosbarger and Lentsch.
VIII. BUS TOUR OF THE CITY
May '8,1971 -----
Mr. Supin ge r stated that the tour of the City for members of the
Planning Commission and the Workable Program Citizens' Committee was
scheduled for May 8, 1971, departing from City Hall at 8:30A.M •.
Members of the Commission who indicated they would attend were: Mrs.
Henn ing , Messrs. Senti, Mosbarger, Lentsch, Weist, and Lone.
IX. DIRECTOR'S CH OICE
Mr. Supinger stated that the dinner meeting for members of the Planning
Com missions in Arapahoe County has been scheduled for May 20, 1971, at
Guespato Cristofolo Chiacchierone Restaurant, 5180 South Broadway, the
socia l hour beginning at 6:30 P.M. Mr. Supinger stated that City Manager
Dial \\Ould spe ak on "Inte governmenta l Cooperation".
X. ATTOR NEY 'S CHO ICE
Cit y ~tto~~a y Berardini gave a r6port on the s ~atus of the annexation
west of Englewood ,
. '
•
I • •
'
•
' ' (
~I EA IORI\NDUM TO TilE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOM-
MENDATION OF 'J:H E CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
DATE : May 1, 1971
SU BJECT : Am e ndm e nt of Zoning Ordinance: §22.5-3(f)
REC OMMENDATION: Th e Planning Commission recommend to City Council that
§22.5-3(f) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance be
amended by repealing the following portion of that
se ction: " .•• nor within five hundred (500) feet of
an existing filling station property line."
Respectfully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission.
RECORDING SECRETA~Y
-9-
(/
• l
•.
I • •
. ' ,
•
•
~tt: City Of Bne lewood
5400 1 . E l~ti Street
~n g le~o o ~, Colo.
To '/i'lO Hl It !1 .:1 y Conccr,l:
•
0
•
0 F F I C l .f>-~u ME NT
C OU rq_ 1 ' CITY I L '' ., )
JUL G '7l
• Tii'<G Fi LE
cO UNCIL .._.._ JOOD COLO·
CIT Y O f E NGLC .
Hay 17, 1971
/e t h e u~dersi cn ed, as ow ne rs a nd t~x p ~ycrs of pro?erty on ,est aker Ave.
S nc le wo o u ,Colo. wish to protest, to wn at we conaiaer a ~ i ~jus~ice, b y the city
of En c;l e:wood.
:c hav e reference to the r ~cent survey by the city en g in1 0 rs for t n e proposed
pa vi ng , curb, and gutter of "/est Bak t:r Ave.
7e prote s t to the re moval or replace ·,ent of a ~y 9roperty st~kes, or e1croach-
~ent of our pro 9erti e s by the City of ~n e lewoo a .
'lr> h 3.ve i n the p1s t ha d true 1.nd accur.:lte surveys ma c.e of our properties by
qu3.1ified e :1 c in e e rs and h ave !_H id t:~.x c s on t )·,ib ·.1 ~~ount of property.
As t ·lXp'l y ers and pro p erty ovmers we would like t h is m\tter to be corrected •
---------------~----------~-______ , ______________ _
_______________ --==~-~--~~-: --~--lL-~~!I:; __ k_z_;_,_-;~z~~~~~~~~~~~~
---------------------~---F.r.:-~ F~~ :9 • ·~ T:) L-:J---~ ~~-~~--·~------------~~ .
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
. '
·-
I • •
\t~: i LY 1)f ;.,nP"leWO ')ll
5400 • ~l~ti 1tre et
,n ·l ~N oo , Colo .
'"'o ~no" I L '1 ~ Conc er 1:
I
•
0
•
'
Ma y 17 , l <j7 l
l e t h e u '1ue rsi r 1ea., 1.s ow 1~> rs 1.10 'I. X H.Y e rs oi' pro ,:>ert~. on /est 11J.K:e ,. ve •
.Srul e NOOl ,r;olo . wis n 'to orot e st , 'toN J.'t 11~> coa3iJer a '1 i 'ljus'tice , u-y r e city
or' },n ••lewood .
. e h a v e r e fere c e to tn e r ~c e tt surv ey oy t h e city e ngin• e rs f or 't r.e p r opo se d
p ving , curb , n £~ ter or est P iK·r \ve .
'/e p r o te s t to tll e re nov·l l or r .,>1 J.~e e'1t of y 9 r op erty s 't'l.ke s , o r e tcr o -e;h -
me nt of o ur roperti s ry ne .iL' of n.l ewoo u .
¥eo n a v e i n tn e tst f•:ll 'true ,nd 1.ccur1te 511rveys maae of our pr oper ties oy
qualifie d en•·i'1e•rs 1.n lV"' ')li t xes 01 t i s a mount of pr operty .
As t lXp<i y ers 1nj p r o •. erty o.-me1·s N Noula li .ne t n is m ;tter to b e corre cted .
---------------~------------l)---__ , ----------------~~-~--=~~~--~-~-~~~~~~~~-~-~~~-1'------------
---------------------~---~~~~-~-~~--~~-.-~~-:-:~--;:;-~~ --~ --~----= -----~~ •
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
. ' •
•.
I . •
t
]-
•
., ..
·.
-_/
•
0
•
•
• .-(. J
,_
•
• •• ' r
I
'!'
•.
. . .
I .
t
' I
•
•
r ( :-',. II\ I
·u~1 ENll
L -FILS
CITY Of-L ·~ L E. OOD. c or:a,
WOR KABL E PROGRAhl C l TI ZENS' COMM J TIEE
MAY 12, 1971
RE GU LAR MEET ING
Members P1 .,., nt: J. Lou1s Park~n on; Dr. Charles Za1tman: Jud 1th B .
II nr11 n g; Milton S ntt; Rus.;;e ll Woods, Jr·.; G or·ge
Johnston : Cha1les Henn in g; Herbert Mosbarge1.
M<>mbers Abs nt· Rever ·e nd ll e 1ber·t lloO>anna ; Denn1 s Kelley, Vi Wetst;
II nr•y Cokayr.e : Malco lm E. Coll~er; Tom Ho ogendy k ; Edna
llear·n; Ja cqt~<.os Stack hou st>; Re v ere nd Allen Strong; Del
Pr1c : Dav 1d L. Beachy; Pau l Shattu ck; Edna Tourt c lot;
Co 1 b r t Cu Inn g .
Olll CJ s Pt e s cn t : S audr ·a Wood , H UD R g1 onal 0 1 f1ce
.James L . Supinge1·, Director oJ Plannin g
Mr. Suprngcr· Jnt oduced Mrs . Sandra Woods , a r presentative Jrom the
Denver Reg 1onnJ O fJice of the Department of Hou s1ng and Ur·b an Developme nt.
Mr • Wood s s tated tha t s h e 1 s Jairly Jam1l iar wi th th e probl ms wh 1c h
th Comnnl t ee is studying , fr·om hav1ng re ently met WIth a group of
p e opl e at the S e n1 c V1 ew School and fr•om c onv e r s ation s with hl r·. Supinger
and Joe Brown, th HUD re presenta tive who di scusse d the Wo 1kab l e Progr am
w1th th e Committee at th e Apr1l 22nd meeting . With th is ba kj!round,
Mr s. Wood s was able to ad dress h r remarks dtre ct ly to th e matters which
the Comm ittee is c onsider·ing an d to make s u gges tions as to the pos si ble
alternate courses of procedure which th e Comm1ttee m1 g ht want to co n-
Sider.
Mrs. Wood discu ed the F e d era l programs which are available : empha izi ng
that the City would have to dec1de what c our e they would want to take 1n
an e ffo rt to so lv e their problems and then whether or n ot they would want
to pa rt1c1pate in any Federal pro gra ms . If the C1ty does c hoos e to apply
for Fe d e ral as s 1stan e , th e f1rst step would b e to h a v e a Wo-rkabl e P r o-
gt·am ce r·1:1fi d ••• a pr requi s ite to partici pation in mo st F e d eral programs.
An y app r o v e d plan fo1 redevelopment would hav to conform to the Com p
hen ~ve Plan tor· t he C i. t y .
Mr s . Woods then m ntion d many of th e avatl.bl Federal pro gr am s , but
lh on s wl11ch sh d iscussed in s om e d eta 1l were· Concentrat d Cod
En1orcem nt (F .A •• E.), Neighbo r hood Dev elopm ent P rogram ( .D .P.)
Urban R n wal and General 1 g hborhood Renewal Pt·ogram (G •• R .P.).
Th<> iollow1ng onun nts w re made relative to th ese programs mo t
part1cularly • th~y would apply to No thw t Englewood ;
0 CE NTRATE D CODE ENFOR C E~I ENT: Mrs. Wood stated that 1n h r op1mon
t111 · prof.p ·a m would b e oril y a ''ha lf-way" m aut· were 1t to be> appl1ed to
or thwe-,t EP~l wood, and that it ''would not treat the exlSLllll-( problems".
L ss t han 5 ~ d mOl1t1on 1 s p tmtlted under the Code Enforcem nt program,
the pl'OJPCl Jmpr·ovt•mc>nt cou ld not in Jude any "underground" wo r k s uch a
t h irr:;l allatJon of wateJ and sewer l1n s, and the a moun t of land th a t
c o u ld b~' .rcqutJ'l'd 110u ld b > r·es tr icted.
E l GHBORI!OO D DEVELOP~IE T P ROGRAM : A key e l e m nt of NDP 1s 1 t s fo u
on the pr-ogramm1 n g and t1m1ng of activities in order to achi ve ystemati c
atcompli -,hm"•t-,. Tl11s 1s th e program und er which t h Colleg V1 w r-
d v lopmvnt program is b 1ng carr1ed out. It t s a fa1rly n w p1ogr-am
and 1 d>stl-(ned t o nablo a c ommunity to b gi n r n wa l act1vity 1n an
at a much s oon'r than under a c onventional Urban Ren wal P rogram . Th1s
pr ·o ~r.rm 1 s based on annual inc t'emental funding and each year's program
ha.,; to "s tand on 1ls own"; the n, 1f for· on t•eason 01 · anoth r· a proje t
do A n ot go on , s ome p h ase o! th project would b c ompl t d. However,
~tr-,. Wood<; c offilncnll'd, one a p1·ojec 1 is fund d, H D 1u!l u su ally s a
p1 o .J '<' t th r·ough.
-L-
• \ !
~
I • •
f
•
•
Unde1 NDP, act1vtt1 sat "more co nc e ntr ated" and the1e 1 constdf'table
c 1 t 1zen 1 nv 1 v men t tin ou gh th e ProJeC t A ea Comm 1 t tee, referJ ed to as
"PA ". Tht<.; re.-.;td nl commit te, mad e up of bl ock lead rs, can and s hould
b e v~JY tnfluen t ta l and it w a ~ po1 n ted out a s ~n examp l e, that th College
V1 w PlOJ cl Ara Comnu ttee had determin ed afte1 c oro SJ dcrable !:-tud y, that
th e ar· a shou l d hav a losed r ather th an open s torm dra tn ag c.y ~ t ern as
ha d b ee n ortg1nally pla nn ed beto e they become involv d .
T he exped1. n ·. ol th1s p r o gram makes 1t particula r l y attrac t1 v b <.a u e
1t pe1m1ts t he p l a nn1 ng to lake pla ce c on cu r n t l y w1th IPhabllttalton
a nd t e b u tl ding acltvtt t es. This mak es it poss1ble for a tiv tly to begin
in an ar a b efo1 th e c1 t1zen interes t J S los t a nd h eJo 1 0 th con d 1L1o ns
1n the p1ob l e m atc>a b ec om e v en mo1· t•itl ca l.
Tw n t y p 1c n t of Lh s tructure would have to b ubstanda d lor an
at a t o be e li g ible to pat t1 tp a t e and t here wou ld hav to b two
blt gllt1ng JnJJuences su c h as mixed land u e and over-towd e d lot s .
Th lu·n lep t ow at·d ge l t1n g an NDP applt at1on approved , would be to
g a Wo1kab l c Pt ogeam app lica tion prepat d , ubm1tted aud cer t1f1 ed .
A L oca l Publtc Agency (L.P.A .) wou ld hav to b ee tabl1.sh e d, then !I UD
would ptov1d 1 u t anl.t al assistance in th e form of loa ns and grant to
th L P A to a~s t s t tn carrytng out the e n ew al undertak1ngs tn one o r mo re
a r a wh1ch mav 01 may not b e contiguou s . On a dvantage tu thts prog ram
1 ~ t hat add ttt onal a1eas c an b e added under th e same appltcat ton, even
thou gh tlH y a1e 110t con ttguou s.
Th app0111tmen t o l a Lo c al Publl.c Agency by th e Mayo1' ot Counc li 1
tnit1at ed by the t ece ipt of a p e t1t1on s t gned b y 25 re td nt • Th LPA
would ha v • n ot le s than f1ve no r more than eleven m mbe r s who would
setv q ta gge t Pd l e tm q. Mts . Woods advtsed that om e membe t s ot th
Wotkabl e P1og 1am C1t1zen ·' Commtttee should b e appoint ed to th e LPA , how-
e v e•, on l y one publt c olftc1a l could b e on the a gency .
Befot e th e Couuctl ppo1nt e d a Local Publ tc Age ncy, it wou ld have to
hol d a P ub l1 c Hcattng , du l y ad v e rli ed, and th en fu.d that a "b1tghted
c ondtt1on " x t,t s 11 1 an area or in areas of th e C1ty .
B ccause Eng l e wood ha s a population of l ,; · than 50,000 , we would
patll tpat<' on a 3 /4 Fed 1a1 and I /4 local s ha e . Cted1t 1 g 1ven for
lo <.a l tmprov e men t -; such a a c hool , pa k, f11e tat 1ou, ho ·pital , e tc .,
toward th tty "s sha r e . The Jull ost of the Ja tlllV t s lt g 1ble 1f
th e b ene fit to th DP a1 ea 1 s mor"e rhan 0 ~ of th total benef tt from
thc> fa <.Lltt y . I f the ar a rece 1v e l e than 1 0 '~ ol the b n e itt from
the fac1l1ty , no pa rt of the c ost 1.s el1g1bl e . Th c redtt 1 g ood for
no mo re than 3 y aJs ftom th e beg1nn1ng oi constructton of th e faci l lty.
CONVEN T ION AL U RBAN REN EW L PRO.JECT : Thts prog•·am 1s de s t g ned to a ss 1 s t
c 1t tes tn t ~e tr programs tor the e l1m 1.nat1on and plevenlton of lum and
bl 1ght Hr both res td cn t ial aud non -Je::;tdentta l ar•pa-.;. In con l r a <;t to
th e expc dte nc·y of th e NDP , 1 ba n Renewal 1nvolvC''> a long-r an ge plannu1g
pro cc<;s wl11 c h would td cn ltfy the need-; nd t c::>outc o f th e commun lly and
establtsh qc h e dules and pttorJLJCS for a c ompl1 5 h1ng th e wok to b e done.
Blt ghte d areas would b rehab llttat •d and r developed and bu t 1ding
that cons tttut a hazatd to th publt • would be demoltshed and the land
c le a 1 d and so l d to pt ·tvatt• e ntet p r 1 fo1 ted velopment tn ac ordance
w1 th .111 adopt d Pl. n . Tht p la n would b a l ega l b111d1n g do c ument ,
adopted l o llow tng a Publi c Ile a l 1ng .
s 11 1 th• ~,•t ghbothood D<.•v·lopm nt Progt•am , a er tt ftcd WoJkablc Prog ram
1-, pt"<' JPqu t-;11<' to l undt n g and a Loca l P rOJec t Ag n y would hav e to be
appom tPd !o llowtng th saml' pro ce du e a s se t fo1 t h und 1 th ref t·e nce
t o NDP.
-2-
'
•
I • •
. , ·' \ !
J
'r
•
•
The Lo cal Publ1 Agency 1n both the NDP and URP would l11re a d~re tor
and a laff wh~ch would ca 1 y out the project and wh~ h woul d b res-
ponstble to the LPA . It might be po ss~b l e for the LPA to contract w1th
th Ctty to hav th Planrung Staff do t h e n e es:::.ary pre l 1m~naty work.
Because rehous1n g pe son l1v i n g in house too d1lap~dated to 1epa1r or
1 n an unacceptabl ' lo a t~on 1 s v t ta 1 to t111 p1 ogram of r h ol bJll ta oon,
~l may also b necessaty to appoint a Lo al ll ous1ng Author ~t y (L.H.A .).
Th e LPA and LHA ca n be the same .Ln d Jvtdual s, howeve t , separat mtnutes
would have t o be kept of th 1r a c lton when they were func t ioning as th e
LPA <tnd as lh LilA . Any p ersons who would hav to b e r·e h used becau e
of ~he renewal p1ogt<tm, would have to hav an opportun 1 Ly to be r house d
"ln Euglewood .
A in th ' e"lghborhood Deve lopm nt Prog ta m, t he C1ty wou ld determ1n e the
bounda1 1 ·-.;of the Rene wal APea.
Bet•au...,P Lh Plann1n g .1 s done 1n advanc 1ath 1 than du11ng the .l C Ll.vity
as unci 1 DP, 1t will take a long r t1m , up to etght en mon th s, before
th • plan, ate execute d.
The cLLv111cs an d plOJeCts are ftnan d •1lh F deral advancr and loans ,
F deJ al g1ants and loca l co nttlbul.lon Be ·au Eugl wood h , s l e s than
50,000 populat1on, we would b e e ll.gib l e lot a 3 14 -1 /4 p1og ram . The
l ocal con trtbut J on could tn lude e 1ther h 01 non-cac;h gran t i n a id.
As undet DP, ee tl a tn tmprovements such a hool , pa k s , pub l1c facill-
lt s ho ~pttal. tc ., would qual 1fy a non - a h g1ant 1n a1d tf th e
fac1l1tt es p t ovtde a u fficie nt b en fit to th area as d t s u ~ d unde
th DP ect1on . I f on e a rea d.1d not u e all of th e cre d 1ts ava1 lable
to that a r a, they cou ld be "pool d" and used tn an other U RP a1 ea OJ'
ll ansfet red to an DP area; howev e t , c t ed1 t pool ed 1n a n NDP ar a cou ld
not b e tra nsfene d to an area under a onv e nt1onal re n ewal progrilll.
Spec tal re h ab.1 l1t atton loan and g a nts and hou sing a ss1stan e p1ograms
for low tn c orn , e ld r ly and hand1 apped 1n d1vidual s and fam1l1 e who r e -
td e 1n th e proj ec t areas would al o be ava1lable undet· both program s .
Fo1 exampl , tf a fam1ly h ad an 1ncome of l e s than $3,000 per yea 1·, they
1\0uld be lip,tble for an out-l·tght grant of $3 ,500 to 1epa1r their home.
If th e r e pau c o s t $5,000 th e $3,500 c ould be appl1cd and they could get
a loa n w1 th 3 % in t e . est on the e mai n 1ng $1 ,500 . 1 f theu 111c om e were
mo 1e than $3,000, but s ttll low enough to qu a l1fy for atd, the family
ould ge t a 3% loan for repairs.
The URP wou ld b e ca 1 11ed ou t HI two phase s. An appl ica t 10n, s.1g ned by
th e Cha u ·man of th e LPA , wou l d be subm1tted to HUD for a Sutvey and
Plann1ng (S & P ) p,1ant , .nd un d er Su1vey and P lann1n g, th e ~n-depth
study of th e p tojec t a rea would be ca rried out . Th e sec ond phas would
tnvolve th e ubml">Ston of th e d ocument s f o r th e Urban Renewal P ro1e c t to
II D for apptoval , th en the arttvtty wou l d beg1n--some 18 month later .
hl1~. Wo od1 ~ta ted that there 1 not muc h dtfference 1n the t 1m requtre d
to actual lv me t the goa ls und r eith er the NDP ot URP, even th ou gh
a ·ttvtt y o;tatl !=> ..;oonet undet ND P .
The GE ERAL E I GIIBORIIOOD RENEWAL PROGRAM (G.N.R.P.). t'i a commun1ty-
wlde -piOKJam. The cnt11e commun.1ty would be stud1ed and p 1 t011t y a1· as
s tablt hcd. Th1s p1 ogram 1 not be1ng funded al th1 s Ltm c, and wa not
r omm ndcd as one 1n wh 1 c h th e C1ty should pa t1c1pate .
~Ir s. Woods s tated th a t because the NorU1wes t Engle~~<ood atea ~ (.Onli guous
to th D nve1 ~lodel CltH?S Targ f't Area 2 , that 1t eou ld be a natural ex-
ten s ton or th Co llege \'1 w Pt·og1am and that th ere m1g ht b a ''g ood c hance "
tha t an appltcaLJon would be a pp r oved 1n th l area, although s h e ould not
"gua1ant1:'t'" that tt wou ld b e appro v ed. Sh e a l so potnted out that th new
sc~'IIH ' \'1 w School II OU ld b c ll g 1bl e fot• non -c ash cred 1t towa1d th local
s har e l ot Lhtee years !1om th e beginning oJ cons lJu ct 10n.
-3 -
•
. ,
•.
I • •
·. .• I !
' !
•
•
Th p opo ed d ainage p arkway South of Vassar would be elig1bl e for p r o -
J ct money wh1 h could b e u ed to purc ha e land and /or equipme nt , plant
gra !::>, etc .
l n 1
po1nt
ponse to qu e tton s and an open dtscusston pertod, the f ollowing
wete made by Mrs. Wood s:
Th Ctty ha s to dectde whether t h ey want an Urban Re n e wal P r og r am o r not,
a nd , 1f they do , wh 1 h prog r am would b e mo s t a c e p t abl e .
A ll houses in th e p rojec t a rea would have to b e brou g ht u p to Property
Re habilitation Standard (P.R .S.) by the e nd of the proJe c t. Any family
wh1c h has to b e relocat ed would have to be re loc ate d in a "de ce nt" house.
If a family were renting a s ubstanda r d hou se , they cou ld ge t a $2,000
re locati on p ayme n t . If th e owner refu sed to remodel the house, the LPA
cou ld pu1·c h ase the hou se unde their powe1·s of e mi nent doma i n.
Thee has been ve r y little displa cement 1n the Coll ege V1ew Area ; that
winch ha s b ee n ne cess ary has been i n the Storm Dr aina ge a rea . An 1nteresting
co n ce pt ha s b ee n u se d, howev er , where only th e su b s tanda rd stru ctu re has
b een purchased by the LPA at a fair market value and remov ed from the
lot. The lot is not purchas e d, but rematns und er the same ownershtp . The
own er then c an get 235 money to build a hou se on the lot which would
probabl y b e b e tter suited to the f am1ly need s.
It would b e c h ea per to build a new hom e than to remodel a s ubstandard
urnt , and if th e homeowne r would want to "lake 1t on ", they m1 g ht be able
to get a 3 ~ 20-year loan to r e build . More ty p ica ll y , LPA would pu rc h ase
the hou se at the fair marke t value and the fam1ly would b e gi v e n up to
$15 ,000 to relocate.
A st tuation c ould possi bly ar1se where a per on with a s ub tanda r d house
wh1 c h has a mo tgage on tt could find h1m e lf penaltzed 1 f he bo rrowed
mon ey to b r 1ng th e house up to c ode. It was s ugge s ted that peopl e are
avatlable to a dvise the owner in a case l1ke tht s ,
We hould encou age pr1vate enterpr1se to develop under §235 and §236
programs w1 th1n the C1ty 1f the units would b e available to peopl e who
have to b e relocated 1rom the proje c t area or areas. §235 provides for
uppl e me nta1 payment to lenders on FHA insured home mortgage loans to
lov.-tncom f a mll1es a nd §236 prov1des re nt s uppl e ment payme nts, e .g ., 1f
a fam1l wh1ch c an pay only $80 a month for rent 1 S liv1ng 1n a un1t
win ·h ha ben a pprov ed to rent for $120, the Gov err.mert would mak e up
th S 40 d 1 ife•ence to the owner.
At tin t1m e, the full cos t of re location and re hab ilitation gra nt s 1
patd by HUD , by June of 1972, the C1ty will have to pay one -tht.r d of this
c o st .
Th r e a 1 e no more model c1L1e p rogra ms bctng approve d at thi s ttme.
The pas 1bllity of re v e nu e s hartng is pre i pltating change 1n th e HUD
o1 g an1zation . Some fu n c t tons a1 b ing on s olidated in ant1c1pat1on of
a r·e venue h a ru1g-b lock gra nt lta so n •
Ther 1s ltltle money avatlable at thi s time for new p r oj ect
the money ha b en se t astde for on-going proj ects .
mo st of
It i s un lik l y that th C1ty would get two pro ject fu nd ed at thts t1me.
I t 1s b est to hav e local emp loy ees pre pare the appl1cat1on s , 1f 1t 1s at
all po ss 1ble . II UD perso nn e l c ould be mad availobl to help the City
with th preparat1on of the narrat ive in the appli cat1on.
-4-
•
. (
I • •
t
•
•
•
I f suff~c1ent reserv d funds a e not available to c omplete a project, 1t
1s s om et~m e ne ssary to ''cut ba c k" a project as they are having to do
in th e Ru s 11 PaJk-hlanual prog am in Denve r .
,_
Mrs. Wood
before th
e n c oura g d the 1ty to get an application f o a p o gr am on f1le
e nd of thi fis al year if possible.
Mrs. Wood s sta t ed that tn her opinion the NDP would have a bette r c hance
of b e in g approved.
In the cove r· l etter·, t h e C~t y s hould indica te a will1n gness to g o e ~theJ ·
NDP o the Conv enttonal Urban Re newal Project.
Du r ~n g t h e d1s c u ss1o n, Mrs. Hennin g suggested that th e Commit t ee members
should not "get set" on the No r thwest Englewood area ; that the possi bility
of an application f o a pJoj ect 1n another area should not be pre~luded.
At 9·50 P.M., the meetin g was ca lle d to o r d er and the Minutes of April
22 , 1971 , we re approved a s p rese nted .
Mr. Sup in ge re ported tha tth e City Cou n c~l has designated the alte nate
membe s of the Comm1ttee to part1cipate as full members of the Committee.
They also requested the Committee submit names to them for appointment
from the areas of co n cern and from the minor~ty commun ity . This matter
w1ll be cons1dered at the next meeting.
The matt er of the election of p ermanent o ff~cers was considered. Mr.
Loui s Pa kin son was nominated by Mr. Johnston to serve as permanent
Chairman of the Workable P r og ra m C1tizens' Comm1ttee. There were no
fu ther nom~nations. Mrs. Henn1ng moved that the nominations be c losed
and that a unanimous ballot be cast fo M . Park1nson. The mot1on
carried unanimously.
Mr. John s ton nominated Ru ssell G. Woods, Jr., as Vice Chairman. There
were no further nominations and D • Zartman moved that the noma.a t~ons
be c lose d and a unan~mou s ballot be cast for Mr. Woods. The mot1on
carried unanimously.
Mr. Sup1n ger was asked to discuss the appo1ntment of a permanent
with Mr. D~al.
cre tary
Th e tour win c h was taken on May 8th by members of the C1 ty plann~n g and
Zon1ng Commi s ton and the Workable Program C1Lizen ' Comm1 tt e wa d1 -
cu ed.
Th e Swedi h Medical Center pl a n for development wa c on idered . Mrs .
Hennin g a k e d that th1 matt e r be placed on the agenda of a future meeting.
Th e matt er of th In c ea ed multt-family development within the C1ty was
di sc u sse d i n re l ation to the ove all g oal of the Ci t y . Dr. Zartman ex-
pressed c on cern of th S hool D1 tr1ct at th d cr a e In the chool
population as th e e mph a is ~n new d e v e lopme nt 1 pla ced on the adult
apartment un1t , D1. Zartman ctted th n ew Sc n~ v~ew El e mentary School
a s an xample of a la rge 1nvestment ~n th e communtt y and the need to
d e v e lop housing for famiiie 10 that area to JU t1f y th e expend1ture for
the sc hool •
Wh e the or not apa tment dwell er "1dentd y w1 th the City'' wa dt c u sse d .
Th e ec onom~c feas1b1ltty of bu1ld1ng a small, Ingle-family hou e wa
on st dered and M • He nntng s ugge s ted that plan for hous1ng fol per ons
tn th e $6,000 to $10,000 income bracket would be dtscu sed at an Envlron-
ment a J Hou s ing Confere n ce, s pon s o ed by th Sav1ng League of Colorado
on May 17th at th e Co s mopol1tan Hotel.
-5-
•
.• \ !
'!
I •
. '
•
'
•
Mr. Supinger commented that the City's plans to increase the amount of
required off-street parking might have an effect on the apartment con-
struction, 1n the city, at least temporarily .
The matter o f the preliminary Workable Program application was discussed
and Mr. Sup1nger said that a draft would be given to the Committee at the
n ext meeti n g.
It was determined that the next meeting would be on June 3rd at 7:30P.M .
The meeti n g was adjourned.
Pro Tern
-6-
•
·. . ,
. (
I • •
0
I ! .
'f
f 2
•
WORKABLE PROGRAM CITIZENS' COMMITTEE
June 3, 1971
Re gu lar Meeting
Membe rs Present: Reverend Herbe rt Hosanna, Dr. Char les Zartman,
Judith B . Henning , Jacques Stackhouse , Ru ssell G .
Woods , Jr ., and George Johnston
Members Absent: J . Loui Park 1.nson, Dennis Kelley, Vi Weist, Henry
Cokayne, Mal olm E. Collier , Tom Hoogendyk, Edna
Hearn, Milton Senti, Re ve re nd Allen Strong, Del
Pri ce, David L . Beachy, Char le s Henning, Paul
Shattuck , Edna Tourtelot , Colbert Cushing, and
Herbert Mosbarger.
0Lh ers Prese nt : Berry J . Slater, Human Relations Council
Jame L . Sup1nger , Director of Planning
The meeting was called to order at 7:45 p.m. by Vice Chairman Woods .
Th e Minutes of the May 12th meeting were approved as presented.
Revere nd Hosanna was called upon to give the report of the Rules and
Procedure Committee. Reverend Hosanna said that he did not have a
final report at this time, but that he had discussed the matter WJ.th
Chairman Parkinson and that th ey had identified several "concerns"
about which they would like to receive comments from the Committee
me mb ers.
The first point o f discussion was the matter of the terms of t he Com-
mJ.ttee members. Reverend Hosanna stated that he realized that the
members serve at the pleasure of the Council, but that he personally
p ref ers to know when he is asked to serve on a committee what the
l e ngth o f the term will be. Whether this will be a continu1ng com-
mittee or an ad hoc committee to serve only until the Workabw P o gram
application is certified was discussed. If it is to be a c ont i nu1n g
committee, it was suggested that the members should serve "staggered "
teems in order that there would be a nucleus of "old" memb ers to lend
continuity to on-going programs and to brief any new membe rs. Most of
those present felt that it would be most advantageous to the City if
the members were to be appointed for a term of at least two year , the
period o f time f or which certification of the Workable Pro gram i gi ven .
They also suggested that there should be provision for the re appo intment
of me mbers. Mr. Sup1nger stated that it was his understandin g that
th1.s is to be an on-going c ommittee and suggested that the Comm1ttee
plan to hold a study session with the City Council when the Workable
Pro g ram application is ready to be referred to them, and to d1scuss
the future of the Committee at that time.
Th e p1·oblem of continuing persons on the Committee who have not attended
any meeti n gs was discussed, as well as the status of memb ers appo1.nted
by an organization who mi ght discontinue relationship w1th that organJ.za-
t.J.on while servin g on the Committ e.
The re lationship betwe e n thi ommittee, a Lo al Housin g Authority, a
Lo c al Public Agency, o r an Urban Renewal Authority was considered. Mr .
Sup1.nger pointed out that hould the City establish the LHA and LPA,
that there could well b member of the Workabl Program C1tizens '
ommittee appoi n ted to s rve on those committees, but that this Com-
rnlttee as a whole could no t c onstitute the LHA or LPA, if for no other
rPas on than that the m mber hip of the LHA and LPA is restricted to
b tween fJ.ve and eleven membe s.
Revere nd Hosanna stated that the second matter of c oncern is the tlumber
o1 members necessa l'Y for a quorum . His initial thinking would be that
one -third of the me mb ership would be ne cess ary to establish a quorum .
....
•
.• I [
'!
I
•.
•
. '
•
f
]
•
The third subject suggested by the Rules and Procedure Committee f or
discussi on was parlimentary procedure. Reverend Hosanna suggested
that Rob ert 's Rules of Order be followed and there was no objection
VOl.Ced,
Th fourt h point raised by Reverend Hosanna pertained to voting , and
he suggested that a simple majority of those present reign. This was
also agreeable to the Committee.
Revere nd Hosanna indicated that his Committee would take the thoughts
of the members into consideration in formulating the Rules and Procedure
for the Workable Program Citizens' Committee .
Revere nd Hosanna requested that another person be appointed to the
Rules and Procedure Committee, and Jacques Stackhouse agreed to serve.
The Rules and Procedure Committee will give a further report at the
first meeting in July.
The next order of business was the consideration of additional people
who might serve on the Citizens' Committee representing persons in, or
areas of, the City not nqw represented.
The names of several persons were considered and the purpose and
function of the Committee was reviewed with Mr. Slater.
A motion was made by Dr. Zartman and seconded by Reverend Hosanna that
the names of the following persons be submitted to the City Council
for consideration of appointment to the Workable Program Citizens'
Committee:
Berry J. Slater
4031 South Elati Street
G1lbert J. Valdez
3163 West Bellewood Drive
Mrs . Pat Decker
4371 South Clarkson Street
Mrs . Beverly Gonzales
4275 South Pearl Street
Bill Stevenson
2706 South Grant Street.
Human Relations Council
At-Large
At-Large
Human Relations Council
School Board, District #1
The motion carried, The names are to be referred to the City Council
for the1r consideration.
The next item on the agenda was the preliminary draft of the Workable
Program application. Several questions were asked of Mr . Supinger re-
gardi n g the application; however, it was decided that there were not
enough members of the Committee present to consider the preliminary
draft, and it was agreed to lay the matter over until the next meeting .
It w.s decided that the next meeting would be on Thursday, June 17, 1971 .
The taff was asked to call the members of the Committee to remind them
of t h e m ting and to determine whether or not a sufficient number of
the Comm1ttee members would be present to make it worth while to hold
th m eting.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
~u~~ eco ngecretary
. , •
. '
I • •
'
•
WORKABLE PROGRAM CITIZENS' COMMITTEE
JU E 17, 1971
Regular Meeting
Members Prese nt : J. Lou1s Parkin s on ; Ruth H. Allen ; Pat Decker ; Beverly
Gonzales: Berry J. Slater; Vi Weist; Malcolm E. Collier;
Dr . Charles Zartman; Judith B. Hennin g; Milton Senti;
Jacques Stackhouse ; Russell G. Woods, Jr.; George Johnston ;
a nd Herbert Mosbarger
Membet·s Absent : Revere nd He rbert Hosann a: Dennis Kelley ; Henry Cokayne;
Tom Hoogendyk ; Edna He rn; Reverend Allen Strong ; Charles
Henning; David L. Beachy ; Paul Shattuck ; Edna Tourtelot ;
and Bill Stevenson.
Oth e t· Present: Geo ge Da res and James L. Supinger, Director of Planning .
The meeting was called to order at 7:40p.m. by Chairman Parkinson .
AI • Pa r kinson introduced the new members o f the Committee who were present:
Mr s. Decker ; Mrs. Gonzale s; Mrs . Allen and Mr. Slater.
Mr . Stevenson, the new member representing the Englewood Board of Education,
could not be present and Mr. Gilbert Valdez, who was appointed to the Com-
mitt ee by the City Council, c ould not serve at this time because of a con-
f li ct in his schedule. It was announced that Mr. P ice, who represents
the South Suburban Board of Realtors , had ubmitted his resignation.
The minutes of the June 3, 1971, meeting were approved as written.
Mr . Parkinson explained that the purpose of the meeting was to review the
pre liminary Workable Prog am application and called upon the Di rect or of
Planning to make the presentation.
Mr. Supinger stated that the broad purpos of the Workable Program IS to
encou age a ''good c ommunity '' by establishl ng a positive program of action
for eliminating existing blight and to pre vent any additional blight from
occuring. In order for the City to participate in any of the Federal aid
p ograms, it is necessary for the City to adopt a Workable Program and to
have it certified by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. The
ce tlfication period is for two years and the program c an be recertified at
the e nd of that time it t h e C1ty is diligently pursuing the plan of action
th at was approved 1n the initial application. Mr. Supinger explained that
the !unction of the Workabl e Program Citizens' Committee will not be com-
pi ted when the Prog ram ts ce rtified ; that this is an "on-going process"
whi c h the City is undet taking, and the Committee will continue, He stated
that wheth r the tl y ap pl1es fo Federal funds o r not , the adoption of a
Wo1kabl e Program 1 • a ~ood procedure to follow.
Th e CommJ t tc th n went through the preliminary dra f t of the application
which had bee n nun led t o mcmb'I'S 1n advance of th m eti n g . The review of
the applH'atJon br·ought forth th following comments:
GE 'ERAL:
Pag 1 • 0 d1 CUSSlOII ,
Att.chm nt IA · No d1scuss1on.
'OD ES A D COD E ENFO RCEMENT·
Pug• 2: Mt. Sup1ngcr stat d that Mr. Joe Brown, with the Reg ional
Ol lJce ot lfUD , hag r·eview d the 1ty's Codes and has suggested a m1nor c hange
in llw Hou s tng Codl', wh1ch ch an ge will b made. The Plumbing, Ele tr1cal
and ~ ll f' Pr · •v n t 1 on Codes 1 equ u ·c no hn nge .
'' •
• t
l •
I • •
·' \ I
I
,
'!
]c::::3-
•
Pa ge 3, §3: It was cla r1f ied that within the year, the 1970
Uniform Building Cod e w1ll be adop te d .
Pa ge 3, §4 : The quest1on was asked a s to the bas is f or the figure
of "875" sub tandard dw e lling units wJ.thin the Ci ty'? Mr. Supinger ex plained
that th1s f 1 gure was es tabl1sh e d from i n formati on obtained in the 1960
C nsus, the 1969 La n d Use Study and from fie ld surveys of the C1 t y.
Th ere was then discussion as to the procedures that c ould b e followed to
bring these units up to c ode. Mr . Supinger stated that areas would b e
de s 1gnat ed throu g hout the C1ty and that systemat ic , deta i led inspections
would then be mad e area by area.
Wh eth er the s ub sta nda rd units will be brou g ht up t o t he standa ds of the
Hou s1 n g Code or the Butld ing Code was th e n di sc u sse d . Mr. Supinger explained
that if the units are unsafe for habitation and are not healthful, that they
would be brou g ht up to an acceptable standard under the Building Code.
Mr . Sup1 n ger then c la r if1ed the basic differen ce between th e two c odes by
sa ying that the Build1n g Cod e deal with co n struction and the Housing Code
re la tes to c onditions , e.g., l ighting o f rooms, ventilation, unsa f e wiring,
san1tary fac J.l it1es, etc . The Direct or ex plaine d in response to a question,
that e ven though a hou se ma y not meet the prese nt Building Code requireme nts ,
if it met th e standard s of the Building Code existing at the time it was
built and an Occ upancy Pet·mit was i ssu ed , the hou s e would be acceptable .
ThJ.s , of c ours e , is assuming the house ha s been mainta ined in such a way
that i t 1 s st 1ll in a safe and healthful c ondition .
Con cern was ex p essed that owner ma y refu e access to the inspectors and
Mr. Sup1n ger s tate d that autho rize d City p ersonn e l do have the authority
to enter u pon property and make in pe cti on s of structur es under both the
Hou s1 n g and Building Cod es.
Wheth er o r not it 1s unrealistic to plan on a c oncentrated code enforcement
of the "ma j o rity of the 875 " s ubstandard un i t s in two years was dtscussed .
Som e of the me mb rs were of the op i nion that t he aim was too high even
thou gh a "maJority " may b e only a U ttle mo re th an one -half of the 875
unit s .
Th e suggestion wa s made that there would have to be mo re inspectors if there
is to be mor e 1ntensified c ode enforcement and that poss1bly th1s recommenda-
tion should b mad to th e Ci ty Council and als o 1ncluded in the statement
g tve n und er thi sec tion of the appli ca tion .
Th e Committe e then di s ussed the probl e m that affe c ts many of the retired
pers on s who c annot ge t a loan to bring their homes up to Code and who do
not have money to do s o .
Sec tion 4 is to b e c on ider d further at a later time.
Pa ge 3, §5 : In d1 sc u ssing the Community 's plan of action for
deal1n g w1lh areas hav1ng a high priority o f need for c od e enforcement, Mr .
Sup1nge1 c omm e nt cl that th e previous section (§4, p.3) s hould pos ibly re -
l a t e mor e c lo se l y to the area or area s d esignated as h igh pr iorit y areas ;
e.g ., th e g oal for ·o n ·ent rat e d c ode enf or ceme nt J.n t h e i nit1 al p er1 od should
poss1bly be b tween 60, nd 100 un i ts , the numbe r of s ub stand a rd un1ts 1n
Area "A", rather than 875 un1 ts.
As was dJ.scu .h d at pr VlOU3 meeting , the Dire tor expla1ned that the ap-
pli cation 1d nt1f1c~ tba n R newal, e1ther N.D .P. or Conve nt io nal, as the
pr·o!{lam t o be U!>Pd t o on t pt·ob l ems wlth1n th e deler1orating areas. He
th en 1·eminded th • Comm 1 tl e Lhat under the Neigh bot•hood Developme nt Program,
th ete would lJ' m l't:' fl X1bil1ty and "fa s ter act1on " than under the Con-
v nt1on.l U1·b a11 Rt'n wal Program.
-2-
. ' •
'I
•
I • •
.• \ !
I
,
'!
• ,. .
§5(a): To comply with this section, an "Areas of Concern Map",
and all germai ne studies will be forwarded w1th the application.
Page 4, §6: Not applicable, ina much as the C1t y has not had a
prev1ous certificati on of the Workable Program.
§7 : Mr. Sup1nger stat d that the s taff proposed to carry out the
enforcement program is the pre sent staff, whi h onsists of five persons,
including the Chief Building Inspe ctor . The Tri-County Health Department
is ide ntified as an ass1sting agency .
§8: Mr. Supinger stated that Chief Building Inspector Brokate
and HUD representative Joe Brown had prepared the fi g u res in this section.
The•·e was no discuss1on.
PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING .
Page 5, §1 : The Director stated that the response in §1 and
§lA is a forthright statement of the information on hand . There was no
discussion.
Page 6, §2: The studies listed under this section were discussed.
M s. Allen suggested that Mr . E. P. Romans, the Director of Parks and
Recreation, be contacted for information prepared for that Department and
for the Parks and Recreation Commission, which might be of assistance to
the Committee.
§3: The question was raised as to whether or not a specific
area should be identified 1n the application as a target area, such as
Area "A"? Mr. Supinger stated that the background information which will
be used as the basis for establishing the priority areas is the 1nforma-
tion that is requested in the application ; it is this information which is
set forth in the response to this section.
Page 7, §4: Mr. Supinger stated that the suggested order of
prior1ty for considering the five Areas of Concern is as follows :
(l) Area A: (The Northwest Englewood Ar e a )
(2) Area E: (The 4700 block from the Broadway/Acoma alley through the
(3)
(4)
(5)
Area B:
Area D:
A ea C :
east side of South Huron Street.)
(An area west of South Broadway and north of West Dartmouth
Avenue).
(An area west of South Broadway and south of U.S. 285).
(An area east of South Broadway to approx1mately South Downing
Street and from East Dartmouth Avenue south to U.S. 285).
In rev1ew1ng the second part of §4, Mr . Supinger said that the C1ty will
complement the proposed Urban Renewal Program by establishing a Housing
Author1ty and/or by cooperati ng with private groups to provide low income
hou ing . As an Indication of the City Council's 1ntent, a Resolution was
adopted by th e ity Coun ·il in 1970, which approved participation by
res1dent of Englewood in the Federal Rent Supplement Program . A copy of
the Re olut1on is to be attached to the application.
The everal Areas o1 Concern were discussed . Dr. Zartman, repr ent1 n g the
S hool Distr1ct, sa1d that the School Distr1ct would l1ke to se Area A,
th no1thwcst ar a, selected as th pr1me target area. A new 1 mentary
school 1s JUSt b ing completed 111 th1s location, and c ould b used a ca h
cr dit. 01·. Zartman aid that th •·ed velopment of the area may t nd to
stimulat th onstru t1on of addit1onal family-oriented unit --resulti ng
111 a mu h-des11Cd 1n reased enrollment in the school. Dr. Zartman then
c 1ted the d c r as 1n th tnglewood School D1strict enrollment from 7200
to 5800 and a de e r asc in the S ce n1 V1cw Elementary School di tr1ct from
230 to 166 pup1ls. The n•w chool 1s des1gned to accommodate 300 pup1ls.
Dr. Zartman also 1nd1cated that because of th proximtty of th1s area to
th area 111 wh1ch lh ~ Nc 1ghborhood Development Program i be1ng Implemented
1n ollegc Vi ew , that Area "A" l nds itself to a high priority.
-3-
•
.• I {
'T
I
•.
•
0 '
•
'
• 1'-
Mr. Supinger stated that Area "A" was suggested as the high-priority area
because it contained the highest percentage of sub-standard units and be-
cause the City could "take advantage of" the street paving, storm drainage
and other public facilities. He also reminded the Committee that if there
were more cash credits than could be used in Area "A", that they could
possibly be transferred to Area "E" under a Neighborhood Development Program.
Area "E" has no apparent possibilities of cash credits at this time .
It was s uggested that the area around the Central Business District has be-
come "drastically deteriorated" and that it should be considered as a high-
priority area. Mr. Supin ger stated that that is an area of vital concern ,
but that it might be well to wait until a proposed study of the area IS com-
pleted In order that the Committee would have better information upon which
to base their decision .
It was also suggested that in Areas "C" and "D" that there may be "enough
attraction to encourage the private sector" to redevelop deteriorated or
deteriorating properties.
§5 : Mr. Supinger explained that the reply given for this sect1o n
in the preliminary application applies to Area "A". The Committee suggested
that an estimated figure should be given for the proposed stot~ dra1na ge
and greenbelt programs and the construction of the proposed fire station .
Mr. Supinger said that he would provide an estimated budget for these
programs.
Page 8, §6 is not applicable.
§7: The 1971 budget figures given for the City Manager's Offi ce
($57,916) and the Planning Department ($65,666) are the total budget
figures and not broken down into line items; this, said Mr. Supinger, i
the procedure followed in other applications with which he is familiar .
§8: It was suggested that the Chief Building Inspector should
be added to the list of the staff personnel participating in the Program .
Mr. Supinger stated that the Chief Building Inspector is not necessarily
involved in the Planning and Programming stages. The question was raised
as to whether or not the public school staff s hould be listed? Mr . Supinger
pointed out that the application is concerned with the City personnel
parti ci pation at this point.
Page 9, §9: This section relates to the role of the City Manager
and City Council in the "planning process"; there were no question s or
c omments .
§10: It was suggested that the Human Relations Council should
be added to the list of local agencies represented on the Workable Program
Citizen's Committee.
The Committee discussed the lack of participation by the individuals appointed
to represent the Englewood High School students . It was proposed that a
contact be made to g t new representatives from the High School student body;
the officers of the Junior and Senior classes were suggested, providing a
possibility of a carry -ov er of the Junior Class representativ for two
years.
Mr. Parkinson uggest d that in addition to the listing of the partt 1pating
agencies, a statement should be added to the effect that the Workable Pro-
gram Citizens' ommittee members have recommended individuals to s rve on
the Committe who do not necessarily represent an organ1zation.
Mr . Johnston moved, Mr He nning seconded, that the matter of the Workable
Program application be tabled. The motion carried.
-4-
• . ,
•.
I • •
•'
I
,
'!'
•
• ,_
V. OLD BUSINESS
The matter of Committee members who have not attended meetings was discussed
further. It was suggested that the organizations whose representatives
have not attended meetings of the Committee should be contacted and requested
to appoint new representatives. These names, then, would be f orwa rded to
the City Council for appointment in place of the non-attendin g members. It
was suggested that action be deferred until the report of the Ru les and Pro-
cedure Committee had been received. No further action was taken.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
Mrs. Weist stated that a person would be appointed from the South Suburban
Board of Realtors to re pla ce Mr. Del Price, who has submitted his resigna -
tion fr om the Committee .
Dr. Zartman raised the possibility of the City making use o f the proper ty
upon which is located the original Scenic View Elementary Sc hool. Interest
was expressed in the possib ility; however, no action was taken.
Mr. Supinger stated that no person has been found as yet to serve as
Secretary to the Committee, and that the Assistant Planning Director· would
serve pro tempore.
In response to a question by Mr. Johnston, the Committee was reminded that
the Rules and Procedure Committee, chaired by Reverend Hosanna, would report
at the next meeting.
Following a short recess, Dr. Zartman moved that the matter of the Workable
Program application be removed from the Table. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Johnston. The motion carried.
HOUSING AND RELOCATION.
Page 10, §1: Mr. Supin ger explained that the i nformation set
forth in this section is from data supplied by the School District, the
1969 Land Use Study, 1960 Census, and fr om Housing information prepared by
the Plannin g staff . The 0.5% vacancy rate fig ure was provided by the South
Suburban Board o f Realtor's Office.
§2: Mr. Supinger remarked that the figures given in §I would be
updated when the 1970 Census bloc k data i s available.
Page 11, §3 : Afte r hav1ng reviewed th1s section, the membe rs
discussed the merits of 235 and 236 Housing . Dr. Zartman raised a point
of order asking if it were n ecess ary to go into the details of the programs
at this po1nt. The Chairman ru led that the attention of the Comm1ttee
would be directed to the appli cation.
§4: Not applicable.
§5 : o quest1ons or c omm ents.
Pag 12, §6: In response to a question, th Director stated that
the tat m nt r !erred to the City staff when the word "we" is used 1n this
scct1on.
It wa s th d ·ision of the Cha1rman that the rema1n1ng sections of the
appli at1on would be con idered at the next meeting •
Mr . Park1n on a k d whether or not. the n w members of the Committee would
l]k to hnv an oricntat on me ting in order that they might be g1ven the
informat1on ·on id red at. the pr vious meeting ?
-5-
•
. ,
•.
I • •
.• I !
I
'f
f 2
•
After some discussion, it was decided to hold an orientation meeting for
new members at 7:30 p.m. on Thursday, June 24th, in the Planning Department .
The next meeting o f the Committee of the whole will be at 7:30 p.m. on
Thursday, July 1, 1971.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m.
-6-
·'
. '
•.
I • •
,
X
1 ,•
•
•
"1 ·FtCI ~
ARAPAHOE REGIONAL AUTOMATED PROPERTY SUBS~TEM ~ l ')CU I!ENJil
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING
JUNE 16, 1971
REGULAR MEE TING :
l
T he Arapahoe Regional Automated Property Subsystem Policy Board
me t on J une 1 6 , 1971, at 7:40 P .M.
P.M.
Representative s present
Arapahoe County
Littleton
Eng lewood
Absent from Board:
Eng lewood
J ohn Nicholl
W. H. Wa llace
A. R. Bessette
Larry Borger
Stephen A. Lyon
E lmer Schwab
The meeting was c a lled to order by President Wallace at 7:40
MR. NICHOLL MOVE D, MR. BESSETTE SECONDED , THAT THE MINU TES OF
THE MEE TING OF MAY 2 6 , 1971, BE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. Upon the call of
the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Messrs . Bessette, Borger, Lyon, Nicholl, Wallace
Na ys: None
Absent: Mr. Schwab
The President declared the mot i on carried.
* • • • *
Mr. Lyon stated there would be no Secretary -Treasurer's report
submitted as the financial records for June have not been closed.
* * • • *
The "Report of the Project Coordinator" was received for the
record.
Mr. Kirschne r discussed the report with the Board at length.
Mr. Schwab entered and took his seat with the Board at 7 :55
P .M.
Discussio n continued .
MR. BORGER MOVED , MR. NICHOLL SECONDED, THAT THE WORK SCHEDULE
OF EVENTS BE APPROVE D. Mr . Lyon stated that he would vote against
a pprova l because in his opinion the work schedule of events submitted
by Mr . Kirschner did not represent an a dequate plan for the ARAPS
pro j ect a ctivities over the next several months. Upon call of the roll,
the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Bessette, Borger , Nicholl, Wallace
Nay s: Messrs. Lyon , Schwab
Absent: None
The President declared the motion carried .
• • • • *
E
l(
,_
I • •
·' \ !
I f
or
1---
•
-2 -
Mr. Kirschne r reported to the Board that t wo people were hired
and have been assigned their work schedule to he end of the pro ject .
Mr . Martin Burkamp's employment wa s effect ive May 27, 1971, and he has
been assigned t o Groups B and C (Analysis of Dec1s1on Making and Con-
cep tualization) o f the work schedule of events . Miss C la1re Hi ll's
employment became effective on June 1, 1971, and she is ass1gned to
Groups B and C (Ana lysis o f Decisio n Mak1ng and Conceptuali z atio n) as
well as provi ding secretarial services. Mr. K1 rschner e xp ressed his
pleasure with the new employees.
* • * • *
Mr. Kir schner reported t o the Board on the cquis1tion of
additional off ice space, located at 5601 S potswood. The build ing has
been refurbished and the s taff will re locate on June 17.
* * * * •
Mr. Kir schner presented to the Board requested modifications
in classifications and amounts to the o riginal approved bud g et (overall
total of $63,000 unchanged) and requested a policy from the Board
regarding expenditures made in his offic ial capacity . Mr. Kirschner
requested approval of his revised budget, outlined on page 10 of the
report.
MR. LY ON MOVED , MR. BORGE R SECONDED, THAT THE OPERATIONAL
BUDGET AS SUBMITTED BY MR. KIRSCHNER BE APPROVED; THAT THE BOARD RETAIN
CONTROL OVER EXPENDITURES IN THE AREAS OF PERSONAL SERVICE S, TRAVEL AND
CON FEREN CE , TRAINING , SPECIAL COUNSEL , AND NEW OFFICE EQUIPMENT! AND
THAT FOR EXPENDITURES OVER $500.00 IN AREAS UNDER MR. KIRSCHNER'S
CONTROL THE BOARD BE POLLED FOR APPROVAL. Upon the call of the roll,
the vote resulted as follows:
Ay es: Messrs. Bessette, Borge r , Lyon, Nicholl, Schwab, Wallace
Nay s : Non e
Absent: None
The President declared the motion carried .
* * * .. *
Mr . Ki rsch ner introduced Mr. Don Duel l, F1nance Off icer,
School Dis tr ict No. 1, Englewood , Colorado.
Mr. Due ll a ppeared before the Board and discussed the need
for certain sys tems type work in develop ing a Pro gramming , Planning,
Bud geting System to comply with a newl y enacted Colorado statute.
The Board discussed with Mr. Due ll and Mr. Kirschner possible
cooperation between the school distr ict and the ARAPS pro j ect.
MR . BORGE R MOVED, MR. SCHWAB SECONDED , THAT THE PROJECT
COORDINATOR BE Al1l'HORIZED AND DIRECTED TO MEET REPRESENTATIVES OF
SCHOOL DISTRICTS NO . 1 AND NO . 6 TO DETERMINE WHAT THEIR INTERESTS
AND NEEDS ARE AND HOW 'rHEY MIGHT RELATE TO ARAPS AND REPORT BACK AT
THE NEXT BOARD MEETIN G OF ARAPS. Upon the call of the roll, the vote
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Bessette , Borger, Lyon , Nicholl, Schwab, Wallace
Nays: None
1\bsent: None
The President d clared the motion carried •
• • * ••
'I
•.
I • •
.• ' ..
J -
•
- 3 -
The Integrated Municipal Inforaation Systea Contract between
City of Wichita Falls, Texas, and the Arapahoe Regional Autoaated Property
Subsystea was received for the record.
Discussion arose as to whether action would be taken on this
itea without leqal opinion first. Mr. Kirschner re~nded that an
attorney see the contract before approval is made.
MR. BORGER MOVED, MR. NICHOLL SECONDED, THAT THE INTEGRATED
MUNICIPAL INFORMATION SYSTEM CONl'RACT BETWEEN CITY OF WICHITA FALLS,
TEXAS AND THE ARAPAHOE REGIONAL Atrre1CATED P~PERTY SUBSYSTEM BE APPROVED,
SUBJECT TO LEGAL APP~VAL BY THE THREE JURISDICTIONS. Upon the call of
the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Messrs. Bessette, Borqer, Lyon, Nicholl, Schwab, Wallace
Nays: None
Absent: None
The President declared the aotion carrie4.
• • • • •
MR. LYON MOVED, MR. BORGER SECONDED, THAT THE MEETIMG BE
ADJOURNED. Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted u foll,Dws:
Ayes: Messrs. Bessette, Borqer, Lyon, Nicholl, Schwab, Wallace
Nays: None
Absent: None
The President declared the meetinq adjourned at 9:30 P.M.
~_,q_
. .
I • •
0
I
•
•
RIDULAR MEET ING
E:<GL~OOD WATER AND S ~Ell BOARD JUNE 15, Ll~71
The meeting wa s called o order by Vice Chairman Ha rder at 5 :25 PM.
Members Present : Harder, Kreiling , Mock, Menger , Lay
Member s Absent : Robohm , Rosvall, Sch wab , Ho'rton
Other Officials Pr es en t: Utilities Di rector Carroll
(I CIAl
1 .. U L
_, TU
~ '71
...;TI~<G t
,L WOOD,<
1. PROPOSED SUPPLEl'!ENT NO . 2 TO CONNECTOR'S AGREFJII ENT, SFAWER CONTRACT NO. 13.
Mr. Carroll presented to the Board the request of Greenbelt Sanitation District
to annex the territory legally desc ribed as Tract 40 , Clark Colony No. 3, Arapahoe
County Colorado , and presented in t he form of Supplement No. 3 to Connector's
Agreement, Sewer Contract No . 13. After a brief discussion •••
Lay moved ,
KREILING SECONDED , THAT THE WATER AND S&iER OOARD REX:OMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THAT
THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SUPPLEl'!ENT NO. 2 TO CONNECTOR'S AOREJio!BNT
SEWER CONTRACT NO . 13 BE APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN GREE:<BELT
SANITAT ION -DISTRICT AND THAT SAID SUPPLEMENT BE APPROVED AND
PROPERLY EnX:trrED BY THE CITY.
Ayes: Harder, Kreiling, Mock, Menger , Lay.
Nays: None
Absent : Robohm, Rosva ll, Sch wab, Horton.
? PROPOSED SUPPLF~ENT NO , 30 to SOUTHG ATE SANITA TI ON DISTRICT CONNEX:TOR 'S AGREEME:<T.
Mr . Carroll next presented to the Board the reque s t of Southgate Sanitation District
to annex t erri t ory des c ribed as Lots 30 and 31 , Subdivision of Section 21, Town,
ship 5 Sou th, Range 67 1 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, Arapahoe County, Colorado
and more particularly described in the propo sed supplement . After a brief discussion •••
Mock moved ,
MENGER ~LlN DED, THAT THE WATER AND S~ER OOARD RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL
THAT THE LAND DESCRIBED IN SUPPLEMENT NO . 30 TO THK SOU'n!GATE
SA NITATION DISTRI CT CONNECTOR 'S AGREEJ!ENT BE APPROVED FOR INCLUSION
INTO THAT DISTR ICT AND THAT SAID SUPPLDIENT BK APPROVED AND
PROPfltLY EXECUTE D BY THE CITY .
AYe s: Harder, Kreillng . Mock, Menger.
Nays 1 None,
Absent : Robohm , Rosvall, ch wa b , Hor on .
3. BOREAS PASS WATER Rir.HTS .
Mr . Carroll then introduced the matter of ~he Clty 's Boreas Pass water rights which
subjec had been tabled a he ~ay mee i ng pending receipt of further information
r om Mr . Carroll . he follow n s a em n wh1ch had been mailed earlier to all
members wa s hen d1str1buted o t ho se o resent wh o did not have copies with them:
OOREA S PASS
Boreas Pass, on the historic rail lin betwee n Como and Breckenridge, is at an
alti ude of 11 ,500 feet, on he Con tinental Divide .
•.
I • •
f
-
..
•
•
•
In 1 910 a ditch was constructed on the south face of the adjacent peak to inter-
cept s pring runoff and carry the water from the western side, across the pass;
and into a tributary of the Taryall. In 1937 this ditch was adjudicated by the
District Court, with an absolute decree of 1 2 cubic feet per second, having priority
num ber 22 3 . In the same adjudication, the Court granted a conditional decree for
38 C.F .S . for the proposed extensi on to t he earlier ditch.
The City bo ught these right s i n 1 951 for $1 34,000 . Soon after, the City extended
th e ditch and received an absol ut e number 22 4 f or 4 C.F .S . and abandoned the
rema i ning 3u C.F.S . on t he enlar geme nt .
Between 1956 and 1 960 the City diverted all it could, considering the geologic
drawbacks of the po r ou s soil. During this period the average yield was 307 acre
f e et per year -the year be i ng a summer period of 120 days.
Through 1959 the City inves ted a tot al of $180,000 wit h little or no yield resulting,
A 33 year p eriod of 1936 -1968 inclusive, the average diversions were 115 feet
per ye a r. This is not completely representative of the potential since the
recorder was often installed when the area was a c cessable to vehicular traffic
and the float often froze at one setting during cold nights.
Today I discussed the value of this water in C.F .S . with W.W. Weelen, our con-
sultant. It was his opinion that the water may be salable to up to $20,000 per
C.F.S. This equates to about $520 per inch (senior ditch water locally has drawn
up to $1,000 per inch).
If full yield could be derived, the annual diversion would be:
(a) 12 C.F .S . for 120 days equals 2855 acre feet
(b) u C.F .S. for 120 days equals 1100 acre feet
Total ~ acre feet
One can see that the maximum yiel d has been 1/10 of the decreed allowable diversions.
Were thi s water r ight returned to the natural basin the yield would certainly increase.
We seem to have several cho ices.
1. Expand a large sum to a ttempt to increase the yield and attract a greater
price .
2. Sell as-is at a lower price.
3. Encourage a long term lease if a developer wishes to improve that yield,
with a possible resultant sale of a portion.
~r. Harder t hen queried Mr. Carroll as to t he dollar value of these Rights based
on this analysis. The ensuing discuss i on was indeterminate, the conclusion of
wh i ch was t hat to have a useful basis for deliberation on this point the Board would
need to have a concrete offer from an interested agency .
~ l!l observed that with the value of water right s continuing to increase it would
app ear that we could not lose by just letting the matter remain status quo. Mr.
Men ger and Mr. Kre i ling c oncurred.
~ Me nger suggeste d that a leas ing agreement mi ght enable the City to realize
s ome i ncome f r om t h e s e righ ts wh i le retaining ownersh i p . Mr . Carroll replied
that a leas i ng arrang ement would probably not be a s a ttracti ve to potential developers
as outr ight sale becaus e of the high cost of properl y improv i ng the r i ghts to
realize th e potential •
Mr. Kre iling sug est ed t hat perhaps a leas e with an option to buy (subject to approval
1..
•
' <
• . ..
I • •
·., ' X
l-
•
•
of the electorate) would appeal to potential developers.
Mr. 1!l proposed and those present unanimously agreed that Mr. Carroll be asked to
bri ng to t he Board ~ concrete ~ he may be able to elicit from interested
parties. The Board wo ul d then be prepared to di s cuss the matter further on such
offer or offers.
4. PROPOSED NEW SEWER ORD I NANCE.
Mr. Carroll then obs erved that the discussion of the new sewer ordinance would probably
require an h our or two and that it probably should be accomplished when more of the
Board were present . It was the consensus of those present then that Mr. Carroll should
set up a spec ial mee ing f or th i s purpose in the near future,
5. LAN D AT McLELLAN RESERV OIR.
Mr. Carroll next po i nted out to t he Board that the City owns 185 acres of land
j u st to t he sout h of McLel l an reservoir. The land is in the path of the population
expansion at the edge of the metropolitan area and has certainly been appreciating
in value. Furth er, a s the Mc Lell an reservoir is developed for recreational purposes,
this land can be expected to appreciate in value all the more rapidly. This, he
observed, is a potential source of funds to provide the necessary capital for water
plant expansion and modernization in the future. The Board agreed that this was an
asset that would bear watching in the light of real estate developments projected
for the area.
Mx. Schwab arrived and was seated at 6:02 P.M.
There being no further business to come before the Board ••
KREILING MOVED,
MENGER SECONDED, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED.
Ayes: Harder, Lay, Kreiling, Mock, Menger, Schwab
Nays: None
Absent: Robohm, Rosvall, Horton
The meeting was adjourned at 6:20 P.M .
3
DALLAS K. STm!ENS
Recording Secretary
. ,
. , ·' I I
I
'!'
' '
. ,
•
I • •
,
X
1-
Date;
Subject:
Recommendation:
•
•
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION
OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLI'){OOD WATER AND SF:IfER OOARD
June 15, 1971
Approval of Propo s ed Supplement No. 2 to Connector's Agreement,
Sewer Contract No. 13
That the land described i n Supplement No. 2 to Connector's
Agreement, Sewer Contract No. 13 be approved for inclusion
into Greenbelt Sanitation District, and that the City
approve and properly execute said Supplement No. 2.
Respectfully submitted,
ENGLF:IfOOD WATER AND SI!WER OOARD
~=--~~--------~at~J~ T.H. Harder
Vice-Chairman
>I
I • •
0
I I
I f
~
-
Date:
Subject:
Recommendation:
•
,_ •
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION
OR REX:OMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
June 15, 1971
Approval of Supplement No. 30 to Connector's Agreement with
Southgate Sanitation Dis t rict Connector's Agreement.
That the land described in Supplement No. 30 the Southgate
Sanitation District Connector's Agreement be approved for inclusion
into that District and that said supplement be approved and
properly executed by the City.
Respectfully submitted,
ENGLEWOOD WATER AND S&iER BOARD
By:_____,~=---:,....------"~"-Lrslail.____
T.H. Harder
Vice-Chainnan
..
. '
I • •
'
•
•
•
0
•
CITY c~t~~LC I A 0
' ~~, n•1 ~c?COltfERI
JL 6 '1 1
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
via Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
c ou· 1, , •
C(Ty O F -N . " --; f='l l."'
"-GL E 0 "' oo. COL.(),
FROM: City Planning and Zoning Commission
SUBJECT: Vacation of Utility Easement in the 3100 Block
Between South Delaware and South Elati Streets.
The City Planning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting June
22, 1971, voted 8-0 to recommend the vacation of the 16 ft.
Utility Easement (except the most southerly 25 feet, which is
needed for down guys and anchors) located in the 3100 block
between South Delaware and South Elati, Subject easement is
no longer needed for utility purposes.
gw
enc: Staff Report
Area Map
Excerpt of Minutes
Respectfully submitted,
t~~
Director of Planning
on behalf of:
City Planning & Zoning Commission
cc: Mr. John Kramer, Englewood Public Schools
Mr. Charles Duncan
June 23, 1971
. '
•.
I • •
. , • • \ t
I
" ' 2
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -1-
Date to be considered:
June 22, 1971
Name of Applicant:
Charles Duncan
Address of Applicant:
•
0 ..
EASEMENT VACATION IN DOTSON SUB.
Case #15-71
3195 South Delaware Street
Relationship of Applicant to Request:
Owner of land abutting a portion of the easement.
Location:
A 16 ft. easement running north and south thru the
center of the Dotson Subdivision, which Subdivision is bounded
on the north by West Dartmouth Avenue, on the east by South
Delaware Street, on the south by West Eastman Avenue, and on
the west by South Elati Street.
Zone D1strict:
R-2-A, Two-family Residential.
Description of Request:
The applicant requests that the easement, which is
not being used, be vacated.
Description of Subject Site and Adjacent Area:
The Dotson Subdivision is the location of the William
E . Bishop Elementary School. The only parcel within the Sub-
division that is not owned by the Englewood School District
is the property owned by Mr. and Mrs. Duncan at 3195 South
Delaware. The Duncan's have a 76 foot frontage on Delaware
with an irregular-shaped rear lot line platted in such a way
as to provide access to a garage at the rear of the adjoining
property, from whi c h the School District has removed the
house .
The surrounding area is developed with low-density
residential dwelling units. I • •
·' \ f
' ' !
•
•
0
STAFF REPORT
Page -2-
EASEMENT VACATION IN DOTSON SUB.
Case #15-71
Planning Department Recommendation:
It is recommended that the platted easement in the
Dotson Subdivision be vacated, except the south 25 feet
thereof, which is being used for utilities.
Background of Previous Action Relating to the Property:
The records show no previous action on this property.
Comments From Other Departments:
Public Service Compan~ -Gas Division: Public Service
has no gas lines in t is alley, we therefore have no
objection to its being vacated.
Public Service Company -Electric Division: This
department has made an 1nvest1gat1on regarding this
proposed vacation and finds that it has no objections,
provided reservations are made for the continued opera-
tion and maintenance of the existing facilities located
in the most southerly twenty-five (25) feet of said
easement. These facilities presently consist of down-
guys and anchors.
Mountain Bell: Mountain Bell has no telephone plant
in the easement proposed for vacation. We have no
comments or recommendations on the proposed vacation.
Department of Public Works: We have no objection to
the above mentioned vacation of easement.
Utilities Department: The only access needed is to
maintain a sanitary sewer manhole serving the Bishop
School and which is located approximately 5 ft. north
of the West Eastman Avenue right-of-way line.
Planning Department Analysis:
When originally platted, this 16 feet was designated
as an easement , not an alley. The south end has been used as
access to a garage located north of the Duncan property, which
garage was an accessory use to a house removed by the School
District several years ago. The School District is using the
garage for storage, but will have access to it from the north,
not the south.
\ !
!
' .
I • •
'
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -3-
.
•
0 --
EASEMENT VACATION IN DOTSON SUB.
Case #15-71
With the exception of the south 25 feet of the ease-
ment which is being used by the Electric Division of Public
Service Company and by the Utilities Department to clean the
manhole for the sewer line serving the Bishop School, the
easement is not being used and serves no useful purpose to the
public . The easement restricts the School District from ex-
panding the school to the east, should they desire to do so;
and by vacating the easement, the School District will be
able to complete the fencing of the south side of their
property .
It is good policy to vacate rights-of-way or easements
which do not and cannot in the future serve a public purpose.
gw
,_
. .
• .
I • •
I I
I ' 1
•
•
PYLE , L
97 J ~~-
\I I t-
<{
_j
I
~ I
I
II
II
II
!
w
~
.I
DARTMOUTH
r ~-
. II
I
I
I
PRIIKtAIG
_.
a..o oo
:I::t:
(l)u iii(/)
1.Li>-
!t:
~cl
<C(I--z
3"" i~ _.
""
-.... , 7690
;: -450 111<4'5C
EASTMAN
•
•
AVE .
. )
-----
0
w ....
4
u
4
>
1.&1
Cll
0 ....
> .....
..J
....
::>
A E .
-----== ~
ill
I I I,
I
r-
J
w
a:
<{
~
<{
_j
w a
'·
I •
'
-
•
•
•
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 22, 1971
,_
I. CA LL TO ORDER .
The regular meet1ng of the City Planning and Zoning Commission was cal led
to order at 8:00 p.m. by Chairman Lentsch.
Members present: Weist; Vobejda; Senti; Patrick; Mosbarger; Lentsch;
Henning ; Carlson
Members absent: None
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
Chairman Lentsch stated that the Minutes of June 8, 1971, were to be con-
sidered for approval, and noted that on Page 2, ,7, the figure should
read $13,000 rather than $130,000.
Patrick moved:
Mosbarger seconded: The Minutes of June 8, 1971, be approved as amended ,
correcting the figure on Page 2, '7 to read $13,000.
The motion carried unanimously.
III. EASEMENT VACATION
Dotson Subdivision
CASE #15-71
Mr. Supinger stated that the Dotson Subdivision is between South Elati and
South Delaware Streets , West Dartmouth Avenue and West Eastman Avenue. Mr.
Supinger noted that there is an easement in this block which is unused ex-
cept for the south 25ft., where the Public Service Company has guy wires,
and in the south 5 ft, the Utilities Department maintains a manhole.
Mr. Supinger stated that it is recommended by the Staff that the easement
be vacated as requested, with the exception of the south 25 feet.
Mrs . Charles Duncan
3195 South Delaware -asked who would be res ponsible for maintaining the
25 ft. easement?
Mr. Supinger stated that this would be the responsibility of the property
owner on whose property the easement falls.
Mr. John Kramer, Manager of Property Services, Englewood School District
#1, stated that he thought when an alley was vacated that the property
reverted to property owners on either side of the alley. Mr. Supinger
pointed out that this is not an "alley", but an "easement", which easement
appears to lie entirely on the School District property. Discussion
followed. Mr. Kramer stated that if the vacation is approved, the school
district will fence the easement off, and maintain it. Further discussion
followed.
Carlson moved:
Mosbarger seconded : The Planning Commission recommend to City Council
that the platted utility easement in the Dotson
Subdivision be vacated, except for the south 25 feet thereof, which is
being used for utilities.
The motion carried unanimously.
IV. MARK TWAIN MOTEL CASE #16-71
3301 South Santa Fe Drive
Mr. Supinger stated that the applicant, Mr. Richard Cannon, wishes to have
approval of nine (9) mobile home spaces he wishes to have in conjunction
with the motel that is existing on the property, Mr. Supinger pointed out
-1-
• \ {
'r
I • •
' I
-
•
•
•
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION
OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
DATE : June 22, 1971
SUBJECT : Easement Vacation in Dotson Subdivision
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommend to City Council that
the platted utility easement in the Dotson Subdivision
be vacated, except for the south 25 feet thereof, which
is being used for utilities.
Respect f ully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission •
-5-
I • •
0
. , .• I !
I
" ' 2X
J-
•
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNC ILMAN LAY
BY At.1I'HORITY
ORDINANCE NO. ~, SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE CREATING AND ESTABLISHING AN IMPROVE~~NT DISTRICT, TO
BE KNO\.rN AS SIDEI~ALK IMPROVEHENT DISTRICT NO. 71; ORDERING THE CONSTRUCTION
THER EIN OF SIDEWALK UiPROVEHENTS; AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS TO
BID UPON THE CONSTRUCTION OF SUCH I~iPROVEHENTS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, pursuant
to the Charter and Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1964, of said City and the Laws
of the State of Colorado, hereby finds and determines that there exists a neces-
sity for the creation of Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71, in said City,
and the construction therein of sidewalk improvements, as described herein; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has heretofore directed the Director of
Public Works to prepare plans, specifications, maps and schedules in accordance
with said laws; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has prepared all the maps and
certificates of his survey, as well as schedules, plans, specifications,
approximations of cost, and all other matters and things in complete form
and substance as required by law; and
WHEREAS, the said maps and certificates of his survey, as well as
schedules, plans, specifications, approximations of cost, and all other
matters are hereby approved and adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, Notice of a public hearing conce~ning the creation of the
Di~trict and the construction of the improvements therein and upon this
ordinance has been published once a week for three weeks in the Englewood
Herald, a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and, in addition, a
copy of the Notice has been mailed, postage prepaid, to each known owner· of
real property within the proposed District; and
WHEREAS, at the time and place specified in said Not1ce, the City
Council met in open session for the purpose of hearing any objections or
protests that might be made against said improvements; and
WHEREAS, all objections and complaints having been duly heard and
cnnsidered, the Council has determined that such objections should be denied
E.v ._ept as this ordinance has accepted them and incorporated herein changes
in said District based upon said objections.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71 is hereby created
and the improvements hereinafter described, consisting of certain sidewalk
improvements, are duly ordered after Notice duly given and Hearing duly held,
all as required by law.
Section 2. The extent of the District to be assessed for the cost
of the improvements shall be all the real property specially benefited and as
more particularly set forth in the Notic e of Hearing as provided by a Reso-
lution of the City Coun c il passed and adopted on the 17th day of May, 1971.
The kind of improvements and the sidewalks on which such improvements shall
be as follows:
Necessary inst a llations, removal and replacement of concrete
sidewalks, c urb and gutter, together with the appurtenances
and incidentals, in the City's right-of-way contiguous to the
following prop rties:
Location
1200 East Dartmouth 1-4
46-51
23-26
16
16
10
Subdivision
Evanston Broadway Addition 2nd
Filing
Evanston Broadway Addition 2nd
Filing
W.H. Betts 1st Addition to
Ev:~nston
'I
•.
I • •
I I
I ' .,.
-
•
•
•
Location
3200 South De laware
3100 South Fox
Lots
1-13
13-24
1-12
12-22
1-12
Block
1
2
1
1
•
Subdivision
Park Addition 2nd Filing
Park Addition 2nd Filing
S,G, Hamlins Broadway
Addition
Corder Subdivision
Uhlman Subdivision
,_
Two unplatted pieces of property, as follows:
Beginning at a point on North line of Oxford Street which is 489 feet
west and 50 feet north of SE corner of NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 Section 4-5-68;
thence W 133 feet along N line of Oxford Street ; thence North 162 feet;
thence East 133 feet; thence South 162 feet to beginning; except North
35 feet Section 4-5-68 (955 West Oxford).
Beginning 489 feet West and 177 feet North of SE corner of NE 1/4 of
SE l/4 of Section 4-5-68; thence North 35 feet; thence West 133 feet;
thence South 35 feet; thence East 133 feet to beginning.
Section 3. Said District shall be ·known as the same is hereby desig-
nated "Sidewalk Improvement District No. 71," in Englewood, Colorado.
Section 4. The construction of said sidewalk improvements in and
for said District, as shown by the plans, specifications and maps thereof,
prepared by the Director of Public Works and approved by the City Council of
the City of Englewood and now on file in the office of the Director of Public
Works, be and the same is hereby authorized and ordered, the material to be
used with such maps, plans and specifications.
Section 5. The estimated total cost of said improvements is $8,624,00;
it is proposed that the City of Englewood will pay approximately $1,327.00 to-
ward the total cost of said improvements. The balance of the total probable cost
(being approximately $7,297.00) is to be paid by special assessments to be
levied upon each parcel of the real property hereinabove described. The approxi-
mate share of the total cost to be assessed per front foot upon any lot or tract
of land fronting or abutting on said improvements is set forth in the Notice of
Hc~ring, as provided by a Resolution adopted and passed by the City Council on
t:.~ 17th day of May, and is:
Vertical curb and gutter $4.88 per lin. ft.
4" aJrbwalk type I 6,38 per lin, ft.
6" curbwalk type I 7.13 per lin. ft.
Sidewalk (4" thick) 1.28 per sq. ft.
Driveway (6" thick) 1,65 per sq. ft.
Cross pan (6" thick-wire mesh) 2.03 per sq. ft.
Removal of old vertical curb and gutter 1.88 per lin. ft.
Remov a l of old curbwalk 2.25 per lin. ft.
Removal of old sidewalks 0,38 per sq. ft.
Removal of old cross pan 0,53 per sq. ft.
Saw concrete 3, 75 per lin. ft.
Concrete steps 7,88 per step ft.
Section 6, All assessments levied against the aforesaid parcels of
real property wi ll be due and p ayab le, without demand, within thirty days from
and after the final publ ications of an ordinance assessing the costs of said
improvements against the real property in the district. In case any owner of
real property shall fail to p ay the whole of such assessment against his
property within said thirty d a y s , then the pro rata cost of said improvements
-2 -
I !
'!'
I •
. ,
•
'
•
•
•
so assessed aga inst his property, together with interest at the rate of six
per cent (6%) per annum on any unpaid balance, shall be payable in five equal
annual installments. The first of such installments of principal and interest
shall be ·due and payable at such time as may be determined in and by the
assessing ordinance, and the remainder of said installments shall be due and
payable successively on the same day of each year thereafter, until all are
paid in full.
Section 7. The Hayor and Director of Finance are hereby authorized
to advertise for bids to construct such improvements in three (3) consecutive
weekly issues of a newsp a per of general circulation, which advertisements may
run concurrently with the publication of this Ordinance.
Section 8. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the
improvements proposed to be constructed and installed will confer a special
benefit upon the property within the District and a general benefit upon the
City as a whole.
Section 9. All ordinances, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed. This Ordinance, after its final passage, shall be recorded
in a hook kept for that purpose, shall be authenticated by the signatures of
the Mayor and Director of Finance, shall be published in said City.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on the 21st
day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 23rd day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the
-----------------· 1971.
----day of
Published by title as Ordinance No. ________ , Series of 1971, on
the ___ day of , 1971.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ex officio City Clerk
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a true, accurate and comple te copy of an Ordinance, passed on final reading
and published in full a s Ord i nance No. ______ , Series of 1971 •
ex officio City Clerk
- 3 -
. '
I • •
0
f
-•
• •
O F'FICIAL.:
CITY COU "''~IL flOCUMENT
{ 1
COU' ~•' ~ [ FILE:
Clyde N Cantrell . PreSidenr
BOARD of DIRECTORS .
CITY OF E CLE:\\ OOD, COLO.
Cerald l. Schlessman. Chairman
Lloyd J Kong
James W Heckman
Lee E Schlessman
Ro c hard H Somon
Clyde N . Canrrell
July 2, 1971
•
City Council
City of Englewood
3400 South Elati
Englewood, Colorado
Attention: Stanley Dial
Dear Mr. Dial:
This letter will clarify to the Council that the City
has vacated the alley just west of our building on
Hampden Avenue for our use and we have no objection
to the public walking through our parking area to a
bridge which may be built in the future across Little
Dry Creek.
In all probability, the public will use the drive way
approved by the Planning Commission when they approved
the parking lot itself.
LBS:ka
Very truly yours,
.AJ#~
L.B. Stones
Vice President
BRAN CH OFriCES 2400 WE ST Al AMEDA, PHONE 9~·5451 , DENVER. COLO. 10221 • 6500 SOUTH IIIIOAOWAY, !'HONE
7'18·2S67 ll lllHON . COlO 1101 20 • VIll A IT AliA. 7200 WEST AlAMEDA. !'HONE 9~-SI~. lAKE1oiOOO, ODlO 102:Mo
• .
I •
I !
...... --------·--------------------~'~--~---------
. '
•
' 2 I
J
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN LAY.
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. ~/ , SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE BROADWAY/ACOMA
ALLEY, LOCATED FROM WEST HAMPDEN AVENUE ON THE NORTH
TO LITTLE DRY CREEK ON THE SOUTH, WHICH PORTION 'IS
WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AS RECORDED; RETAINING
AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF THE
ALLEY FOR ALL UTILITIES, SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE STORM
DRAINAGE.
WHEREAS, there presently exists a public alley lying
between West Hampden Avenue on the north and Little Dry
Creek ~n the south, known as the Broadway/Acoma Alley;
and
WHEREAS, Key Savings and Loan Association has
agreed to construct a pedestrian walkway to be dedicated
to public use as access to the park land south of Dry
Creek in lieu of said alley; and
WHEREAS, a parking lot layout and landsca.ping plan
of said Key Savings and Loan Association will be con-
tingent upon approval by the City of Englewood Planning
and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the City of Englewood has heretofore recommended that
said alley hereinafter described be vacated; and
WHEREAS, all of the land adjoining said alley is
contained within the City of Englewood, Colorado and
does not constitute c boundary line between the City of
Englewood and any county or other municipality; and
WHEREAS, should said alley be vacated, no land
adjoining said alley shall be without an established
public road connecting said land with another estab-
lished public road.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. That the following described alley
located within the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado be and the same is hereby vacated; to-wit:
All of that portion of the Broadway/Acoma
Alley, located from West Hampden Avenue on the
north to Little Dry Creek on the south, which
portion is all within the City of Englewood,
Arapahoe County, Colorado.
-1-
11
. ' ·' \ {
I
"
•.
I . •
f
...... •
Section 2. Provided, however, that the City of
Englewood shall retain and shall reserve the right to
install, maintain, operate, repair and replace by it-
self or by any licensee or holder of a franchise from
the City, any poles, wires, pipes, conduits, sewer
mains and water mains or any other utility now located
in the alley or any portion thereof vacated by this
ordinance. And provided further, that the City of Engle-
wood hereby reserves the right to install and maintain
in that portion of the vacated alley, surface and sub-
surface storm drainage facilities.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first
reading on the 21st day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 23rd
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the
______ day of , 1971.
Published by title as Ordinance No. ,
Series of 1971 on the day of -------~--• 1971.
Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. , Series
of 1971.
. ex officio City Clerk
-2-
' I
•.
I . •
0
,
]
•
•
•
iNTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN LAY.
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE BROADWAY/ACOMA
ALLEY, WCATED FROM WEST HAMPDEN AVENUE ON THE NORTH
TO LITTLE DRY CREEK ON THE SOUTH, WHICH PORTION IS
WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AS RECORDED; RETAINING
AND RESERVING AN EASEMENT FOR THE FULL WIDTH OF THE
ALLEY FOR ALL UTILITIES, SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE STORM
DRAINAGE.
WHEREAS, there presently exists a public alley lying
between West Hampden Avenue on the north and Little Dry
Creek on the south, known as the Broadway/Acoma Alley;
and
WHEREAS, Key Savings and Loan Association has
agreed to construct a pedestrian walkway to be dedicated
to public use as access to the park land south of Dry
Creek in lieu of said alley; and
WHEREAS, a parking lot layout · and landscaping plan
qf said Key Savings and Loan Association will be con-
tingent upon approval by the City of Englewood Planning
and Zoning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of
the City of Englewood has heretofore recommended that
said alley hereinafter described be vacated; and
WHEREAS, all of the land adjoining said alley is
contained within the City of Englewood, Colorado and
does not constitute a boundary line between t'e City of
Englewood and any county or other municipality; and
WHEREAS, should said alley be vacated, no land
adjoining said alley shall be without ·an established
public road connecting said land with another estab-
lished public road.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. That the following described alley
located within the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado be and the same is hereby vacated; to-wit:
All of that portion of the Broadway/Acoma
Alley, located from West Hampden Avenue on the
north to Little Dry -Creek on the south, which
portion is all within the City of Englewood,
Arapahoe County, Colorado.
-1-
,._
. .
I . •
,
~··
J
•
Section 2. Provided, however, that the City of
Englewood shall retain and shall reserve the right to
install, maintain, operate, repair and replace by it-
self or by any licensee or holder of a franchise from
the City, any poles, wires, pipes, conduits, sewer
mains and water mains or any other utility now located
in the alley or any portion thereof vacated by this
ordinance. And provided further, that the City of Engle-
wood hereby reserves the right to install and maintain
in that portion of the vacated alley, surface and sub-
surface storm drainage facilities.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first
reading on the 21st day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 23rd
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the
day of , 19'71. ----
Published by title as Ordinance No. ,
Series of 1971 on the day of · _______ , 1971.
Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. , Series
of 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
. ,
•.
I . •
0
I
]-
)
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT
LOCATED IN THE DOTSON SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, AS
RECORDED .
WHEREAS, there presently exists a utility easement
located in the Dotson Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Englewood has heretofore recommended that the major portion
of said utility easement hereinafter described be vacated; and
WHEREAS, all the land adjoining said utility easement is
contained within the City of Englewood, Colorado.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. That the following described utility ease-
ment, located within the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado, be and the same is hereby vacated to-wit:
A sixteen-foot (16') utility easement running
north and south through the center of the Dotson
Subdivision, which subdivision is bounded on the
north by West Dartmouth Avenue, on the east by
South Delaware Street, on the south by West East-
man Avenue and on the west by South Elati Street;
except, however, the southerly twenty-five feet
(25') of said easement which is to be used by the
Utilities Department of the City of Englewood or by
any licensee or holder of a franchise from the City
for the maintenance of the manhole for a sewer line
serving the Bishop School, and also, for the main-
tenance of existing facilities of the Public Ser-
vice Company -Electric Division.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on
the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the
day of , 1971.
Mayor
Atte st :
ex officio City Clerk
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and
-1-
• I,
\
I . •
· . . , f X
l-
)
1
•
•
foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill
for an Ordinance, introduced , read in full and passed on
first reading on the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
. '
• I
•
. .
I • •
0
,
1-
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN --------------------
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE VACATING A PORTION OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT
LOCATED IN THE DOTSON SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, AS
RECORDED .
WHEREAS, there presently exists a utility easement
located in the Dotson Subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Englewood has heretofore recommended that the major portion
of said utility easement hereinafter described be vacated; and
WHEREAS, all the land adjoining said utility easement is
contained within the City of Englewood, Colorado.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1. That the following described utility ease-
ment, located within the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County,
Colorado, be and the same is hereby vacated to-wit:
A sixteen-foot (16') utility easement running
north and south through the center of the Dotson
Subdivision, which subdivision is bounded on the
north by West Dartmouth Avenue, on the east by
South Delaware Street, on the south by West East-
man Avenue and on the west by South Elati Street;
except, however, the southerly twenty-five feet
(25') of said easement which is to be used by the
Utilities Department of the City of Englewood or by
any licensee or holder of a franchise from the City
for the maintenance of the manhole for a sewer line
serving the Bishop School, and also, for the main-
tenance of existing facilities of the Public Ser-
vice Company -Electric Division.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on
the 6th day of July , A.D., 1971.
Publishe d as a Bill for an Ordinance on the ---------
day of , 1971.
Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk
I , Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and
-1-
. '
I . •
0
.. ·' \ /
I .,.
.......
•
•
foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill
for an Ordinance, introduced , read in full and passed on
first reading on the 6th day of July, A.D., 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
. '
. '
•.
I • •
·' I !
' f
~
0 -
TO: All Members of the Englewood City Council
FROM: Mr. Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
DATE: June 28, 1971
6 11
SUBJECT: POSSIBILITY OF CONTRACTING FOR CUSTODIAL SERVICES
AT THE CITY HALL AND LIBRARY, POLICE BUILDING,
AND PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDINGS
Mr. Stephen A. Lyon, Director of Finance, bas researched the possibllity
of contracting the custodial service at the above buildings in keeping with
your request made during a budget hearing late last year. The figures re-
cited are probable costs lf contract services were obtained from several
private firms, but are not contract quotations.
Based on his research, and my own observations, I would recommend that
we maintain our present "in house" custodial service at all of the bulldings
mentioned.
City Hall and Library Building:
If we were to contract for custodial service at the City Hall and Library,
it would probably cost a minimum of $25, 900 and a maximum of $34, 300,
depending upon the firm employed and whether one or one and one-half
man years would be required for "special services." "Special services"
would Include such Items as securing the building after 10:00 p.m. (this
service is not economical to contract for after 10:00 p.m.), odd jobs,
including special clean-ups and room set-ups for meetings.
Our present costs for custodial service are $30, 200, not counting over-
time which is budgeted at $2, 000. Assuming we only needed to retain
one full time employee for "special services," the least we could contract
our custodial services for would be $25, 900, or a possible savings of
$4,300. The maximum would probably be $30,900, or a possible savings
of only $700.
In view of the questionable economies involved, and the very real possi-
bility of not maintaining the quality of work our present staff renders, I
re om mend that we not contract custodial service at the City Hall and
Library.
Pollee Building:
Present custodial service for the Pollee Building costs approximately
$7, 500 per year. It might be possible to contract for this service for
$3,700, or a savings of $3,800. As with the City Hall and Library, we
would again have to make provision for specllll services. In addition to
(Continued)
...
I
•
-
All Members of the Englewood City Council
June 2 8 , 1971
Page 2
the "special services" listed above, our present custodian performs
numerous other odd jobs which would not be considered a part of any con-
tract service. For example, be regularly cleans and disinfects the in-
terior of all pollee vehicles. 'Ibis, of course, is in addition to the regu-
lar wash jobs received at the Servicenter.
Perhaps the most telling argument against contracting for service in the
Pollee Building is that we wlll soon be moving into our new Police-Fire-
Center, and at this point, I would definitely recommend against cleaning
this building on contract.
Parks and Recreation Buildings:
Present custodial service for the Denny Mlller Building and the Duncan
Building costs approximately $6,600 per year. These services include
special repairs to the buildings, but more importantly control over access
to the inventory at the Denny Mlller Bullding. 'Ibis inventory ranges
from $6,000 to $10,000, depending on the time of the year. Cost of con-
tracting for custodial service alone ranges from $2, 200 to $3, 300. Be-
cause of the control requirement over this large inventory, it is recom-
mended that we again not contract for custodial services.
Respectfully ,
SHD /Ij
Att.
...
I 0
•
•
crry o F ,..-1 ou,,, ':•• C I A IJ
~ ';CU!tf£Nl'
J I/
MEMORANDUM
'F lf IVO J ILE: :>o,co ·
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Mr. Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
Bernard V. Berardini, City Attorney
June 30, 1971
PARKING LIMITATIONS AT CINDERELLA CITY SHOPPING
CENTER.
In response to your questions regarding parking limits
at Cinderella City Shopping Center, and noting that the three
specific questions have been asked, a review of the matter has
been made and the opinion in regard to such parking is as
follows:
1. A municipality may acquire existing parking facilities
for the purpose of off-street parking and such facilities are
determined to be of benefit to the whole community, though the
plan might expressly benefit a downtown retail area. Brodhead,
et al. v. Denver, et al., 126 Colo. 119, 247 P.2d 140. There
are other related cases authorizing off-street parking as a
public and municipal purpose as they relate to the issuance
of revenue bonds. See Davis v. Pueblo, 406 P.2d 671.
Therefore, it is my opinion that the instrument of Novem-
ber 3, 1968 is valid since the City's over-all purpose of the
Deed and Agreement was to acquire off-street parking facilities.
The authority for parking limits already has been estab-
lished in the Deed and Agreement between the City and the
Grantor, Englewood Limited, et al. The Agreement indicates
that the first three (3) hours of continuous parking are
determined to be "free public short term parking"; any change
thereafter can be accomplished by the parties to the A~r ee
ment so long as "free public short term parking" is no t
denied to the public. r----
__..:;;......7 .. ~ot...J',..'
2. It is r ecomme nded that the Traffic M&&l er survey
the parking ar a and advise as to the number and kind of
signs and their prospective locations based upon that survey
that will be necessary to give reasonable notice to cus-
tomers parking in the area.
3 . It is not necessary that the City provide the full
resources to enforce tim limits. The Agreement under Para-
g raph 4(c) indicates that the City shall provide police pro-
tection and traffic supervision for the premises as may be
r easonably r e guired to maintain safe and orderly conditions,
-1-
•.
I • •
'
1
•
•
etc. for the three-hour parking limitation. Any change would
be a matter of mutual agreement. The City Council and the
City Administration would have the right to consider the
burden placed upon the City budget in making this determination.
Respectfully
City Attorney
BVB/jw
cc: All Members of the Englewood City Council
Chief of Police, Jack L. Clasby
Mr. Kells Waggoner, Director of Public Works
-2-
'I
I . •
0
.• \ I
I ·.' ,
'!
•
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN SENTI.
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. e2~ , SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE AMENDI NG CHAPTER 22.5-5a(l0) OF THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE ZONING ORDINANC E , ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1963,
ENTITLED, "PRIVATE OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS FOR RESI-
DENTIAL USES", BY INCREASING THE REQUIRED OFF-STREET
PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES.
WHEREAS, studies indicate that in just two decades
or twenty years, between 1950 and 1970, the number of
passenger cars in use in the United States has more than
doubled from 33 million cars to an estimated 79 million
cars; and
WHEREAS, with the continued prosperity and rising
standards of living, an even greater increase in the
number of passenger vehicles in. use is to be expected
in the next two decades; and
WHEREAS, mass transit systems presently in the em-
bryo and creative stages have not come to fruition in
the Metropolitan Denver area; and
WHEREAS, from statistics provided by the United .
States Government, projected passenger car usage in the
United States in the year 1975 will have increased to
102 million cars; and
WHEREAS, in view of the extreme crisis presented
by automobile transportation in metropolitan areas; and
WHEREAS, the congestion of automobile traffic
on neighborhood and collector streets bears a direct
relationship to the public health, welfare and safety
of the citizens and residents of the City of Englewood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1. That Chapter 22.5-Sa(lO) of the Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 26, Series of
1963, is hereby amended to read as follows:
22.5-Sa. Minimum Standards
In consonanc e with the purpose of zoning
r egulations, as stated in this Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance , "to l e ssen congestion in the streets",
the following are minimum standards for parking
spaces to be maintained in connection with the
buildings and uses indicated; however, nothing in
-1-
,_
, '
•.
I· •
·. •' I !
I ' ..
'!
•
these standards shall be deemed to deprive the
owners or operators of said buildings or uses of
the right to maintain control over all such land
and structures or to make whatever changes they
deem appropriate for the use of such private off-
street parking space.
(10) Single-Family Dwelling ••.•. Two (2)
spaces per each dwelling unit.
Two or More Family Dwellings:
Efficiency Unit •.•.. One (1) space
per each dwelling unit.
One or Two Bedroom Units •••.• One and
one-half (1-1/2) spaces per each
dwelling unit.
Three or More Bedroom Units .••.• Two
(2) spaces per each dwelling unit.
i· "Efficiency Unit" as used herein, shall
mean a dwelling unit consisting of one room and
including a bathroom, kitchen, hallway, closets
and dining alcove directly off of the principal
room, providing such dining alcove does not ex-
ceed 125 sq. ft. in area.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading
on the 7th day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 16th
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the
lc rj. day of )f-d-r 1971.
Published by title as Ordinance No. ..:t. ;;L.
Series of 1971 on the 11 t:6 day of y~ ' ' 1971.
Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
. '
•
'.
I . •
.. , ,
2
•
I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. , Series
of 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-3-
·. . ,
o I
I . •
0
•' \ l
I f
'
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN SENTI.
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. , SERIES OF 1971
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22.5-5a(l0) OF THE COMPRE-
HENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1963,
ENTITLED, "PRIVATE OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS FOR RESI-
DENTIAL USES", BY INCREASING THE REQUIRED OFF-STREET
PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES.
WHEREAS, studies indicate that in just two decades
or twenty years, between 1950 and 1970, the number of
passenger cars in use in the United States has more than
doubled from 33 million cars to an estimated 79 million
cars; and
WHEREAS, with the continued prosperity and rising
standards of living, an even greater increase in the
number of passenger vehicles in. use is to be expected
in the next two decades; and
WHEREAS, mass transit systems presently in the em-
bryo and creative stages have not come to fruition in
the Metropolitan Denver area; and
WHEREAS, from statistics provided by the United .
States Government, projected passenger car usage in the
United States in the year 1975 will have increased to
102 million cars; and
WHEREAS, in view of the extreme crisis presented
by automobile transportation in metropolitan areas; and
WHEREAS, the congestion of automobile traffic
on neighborhood and collector streets bears a direct
relationship to the public health, welfare and safety
of the citizens and residents of the City of Englewood.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1. That Chapter 22.5-5a(l0) of the Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No. 26, Series of
1963, is h e reby amended to read as follows:
22.5-5a. Minimum Standards
In consonance with the purpose of zoning
regulations, as stated in this Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinanc e , "to lessen congestion in the streets",
the following are minimum standards for parking
spac e s to b e maintained in connection with the
buildings and uses indicated; however, nothing in
-1-
I
I . •
.. .• \ f
I ' '!'
-
•
•
these standards shall be deemed to deprive the
owners or operators of said buildings or uses of
the right to maintain control over all such land
and structures or to make whatever changes they
deem appropriate for the use of such private off-
street parking space.
(10) Single-Family Dwelling •.... Two (2)
spaces per each dwelling unit.
Two or More Family Dwellings:
Efficiency Unit ..•.. One (1) space
per each dwelling unit.
One or Two Bedroom Units ..••• One and
one-half (1-1/2) spaces per each
dwelling unit.
Three or More Bedroom Units ...•• Two
(2) spaces per each dwelling unit.
i· "Efficiency Unit" as used herein, shall
mean a dwelling unit consisting of one room and
including a bathroom, kitchen, hallway, closets
and dining alcove directly off of the principal
room, providing such dining alcove does not ex-
ceed 125 sq. ft. in area.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading
on the 7th day of June, 1971.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 16th
day of June, 1971.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the
____ day of 1971.
Published by title as Ordinance No.
Series of 1971 on the day of --=======--~1971.
Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City Clerk
-2-
,_
•
I . •
. ' .· \ I
I ' .,.
1-
•
•
1, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of an ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. , Series
of 1971.
ex officio City Clerk
-3-
,_
..
•.
I . •
I I
I
" ' I
-
J--
•
• •
. .
NOTICE OF
ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE
On the 6th day of July, 1971, City Council of the City of Englewood adopted, on final reading, the following ordinance:
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. ~, SERIES OF 1971
AN CIIIDINANcE AMENDING CHAPTER 22. 5-Sa ( 10) OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES OF 1963, ENTITU:D, "PRIVATE
OFF-STREET PARKING STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES", BY INCREASING THE
REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES.
Copies of the aforesaid ordinance are available for public
inspection in the office of the City Clerk, City Hall, City of Englewood.
Published July 14, 1971, in the Englewood Herald.
..
•.
I • •
•
. , .• \ / , I
1-
-
-
•
•
• •
PARKING SLIDES
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES:
1. 4900 Block South Grant
(camper, truck and cars)
2. 300 Block E. Bellewood
(4 cars, 1 jeep, and 1 boat)
3. 5000 Block South washington
(trailers, car, and truck)
4.)
5.)
Converted .garage
Converted ~arage
3600 block S. Delaware
3400 block S. Downing
88~1 FAVlLY RESIDENTIAL USES:
6. 3400 Block S. Marion
(note new construction)
7.) 8.) 3400 Block South Downing
9.)
10. 3300 block S. Clarkson (a permit has been issued for a new 10 unit apt. on
left-hand corner--corner of Floyd and Clarkson)
11. 3300 block S. Clarkson
12. E. Girard at Clarkson
(south of Swedish Parking Lot)
(note camper and boat)
13. 3300 block s. wa s hington
14. 3300 block S. Pearl
15. 3500 Block S. Pennsylvania
II -,
, .
I • •
0
' X
]-
.. '·-...
16.
17.
18.
19.)
20.)
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.)
28.)
29.
30.
•
•
·, •
3500 block S. Pennsyl~ania
3500 block S. Pearl
3500 Block S. Pearl
(new construction)
3500 block s. Washington
3600 s. Pearl
(cars parked up to stop sign)
3600 s. Pearl
(dead end--half block)
3600 s. Pearl
(note existing apartment in background, nursing
home, and 90-unit structure under construction)
3600 S. Bannock
(one-way street)
3600 S. Delaware
3600 S. Delaware
3600 S. Delaware s..~,f(~ '\:&.c.. ,_ l~""'"j4M--
(existing parking is being used but is not adequate)
3600 block s. Acoma
4100 block S. Bannock
'
. '
• .
I • •
0
·. . , ,
..... :
. . . .
·1 ..
. :I
• · .. .:.
•
•
•
0
•
I.
•. : . ,,, ··.i:··:·. ~~~:--:.· :; ·. <_;. ';··~;~1L~<·:·_
···.;
., ~ : ·· .... , . ..... ...... . . ~ .. . . . __ ...._·-··--··-~ ... -..
Clur.!?ter 75
Off-Street Parking and Parking Lots
§1. Police Power Cou'sidera.tions Justifying Regulation
More and more zoning ordinances contain provisions for
off-street parking in connection with the use of multiple
dwellings, hotels, banks, th eatres and other place:~ of public
assembly, factories, office buildings, supermarkets, depart-
ment stores and other places in which there is or is likely to
he a great d ensity of population or whi<'h are, themselves,
truffic generators.' 'l'he amount of available space for street
parking is limited. There is no more street parking space
a\'ailable for a multi story office or apartment building on a
100 foot front lot than there is in connection with a single
family dwelling on a lot having similar frontage, yet the
requirements of parking space for t.he form er will obviously
be many tim es that of th e latter. There is a con s tantly grow-
ing increase in the sb:e of buildings and in th e numb er and
size of motor cars and trucks; the street widths remain sub-
stantially ns they were. The last two decades ha\'e seen an
unp:trallelled growth in motor vehicle ownership and urban·
area usage resulting in an extreme shortage of automobile
parking space in most, if not nil , American cities and suburban
areas.•
The consequence is that provision for off-street parking
is now generally recognized by planners and municipal offi-
cials as the only practical method of controlling street con-
gestion caused by motor use of streets.•
1 The proposed new Zon ing Resolution of the City of !\ew York
e\·en requires that off-street pa rking space be provided in connection
with one and two -family dwellings .
• zo,.ing a"d Traffic, Th~ ENO Foundation for Highway Traffic
Control, f9 52 ed ., p. 20.
• Zoni"g a1Sd Traffic , supra : "They make it im perative that off-
street parking fa c il ities be provided in ac cordance wi th a pre-determined
schedule ... " See T a ble s XIII, p. 51 to XXIII, p . 70 ind ic ating the
recommended parking space to be provi ded with re s.;>eet to various
princi~W uses of property.
75-1
[C.pJri o .. t U O, '' Ardu H . a.t t ~opl)
'
...
-.
-.,
. i
''· .-
-·-.,
. ,
. '
•
I • •
·' I [ • .,. f 2
J-
. : ;.)·. 'I
~ ..
•
•
• •
.... -·-,~ -~ ... .-
75-2 The La\v or Zoning and Planning Ch. 75
"-
Traffic rongestion and paucity of parking spnce have con-
sequ<'nCI'S far more serious than mere annoyance, conse-
quencl·s which have proved worthy, in e\·ery re~pect, of con-
siderntirJn h ,· rnunicipnl authorities. The lack of parking
spnc~ in "~' al•lished downtown areas has ir. its.:lf been the
fundarurntal cause of those rel.atively new phenomenons, the
motr•l and th<' outlying shopping center, and of the decen-
tralization of indnstrv to suburban and rural areal\. Paral-lellin~ tlu· ri~:e of thcs~ has been the decline of the established
down:o ·.m business nnd hotel areas and of estahlislwd urban
indu~:r ,nl an•ns, with consequent deterioration of buildings,
of fon'·~oi rntering to Jess desirable tenancies, vacant build-
ings, lr·s~ of re>enue and tn.xes, increased cost of police and
fire pr«>t•·ction and, generally, a form ·of urban blight.
Ju~t n.~ the necessity for requiring otT-street parking as a
solution for street congestion caused by too many and too
wide aut .•rnobilcs in too narrow streets and, at least partially,
for th<' e>ils ml.'ntion<>d in the last parn.;raph, hns been
'll.idely rcc·ognizl.'d 4 so the validity of such requir<>ments has
been generally assumed.
The urc.st casual consideration of the prohiE'ms outlined
above, inrlirate that the problems and their ~olntion come
with Urr-l>r1•ad purposes of the exercise of the police power,
naml'ly, within the scope of the conc('pts of public saf('ty,
health, c<•D\'l'nicnce. morals nnd general welfare. The pur-
poses in vi<·w clause of every zoning ('nabling nt't requires
that zonin~ he designed " ... to Jess('n congestion in the
streets: to secure safety from fire, pnnic and other dangers;
to prorn,•tt· henlth nnd the general welfare; ... to facilitate
the ndNJuete provisions of transportation, ... and other 1•uhlic requireltl<'ll!~. Such r('gu)ations shall be made 11ith real'onable
considHat ion. among other things, to the character of the
district, and its peculiar suitability for particular use!', and
"·ith a \·iew to conserring the value of buildings and en-
couraging the most appropriate nse of land ... "
A regulation requiring the provision of otT -street parking
facilities for buildings used for those purposes which in
themsclve1{ are generators of a volume of traffic or which
tend to d('t<>riorate or become municipal liabilities for lnck
• 2 Yukl~y. Zoni11g Law and Praclict (2d ed.), 76, 77, 78 : City
and County or Denv~r V. Denver Buick, Inc. (Sup. Ct . Colo . 19W),
J.47 P .2d 919, dissentinc opinions, ~~~ 936, 937, 947.
-----~,
'
. ·.,·
:• ..
·l :.·.· .•
I ·=·.
'\
. -~-
. '
..
'
:
·.
.-.
' ., '
o I
I • •
.• I [
' ~
~· .... ~ .
,•
•
•
• •
L
·: .. _ '· . ' ~ • J. • ••• • ..... ···:.
.• '-
OfT-Street Parking and Parking Lots 7.S-3
of parking space,· would fall clearly within one or more of
the qu~>t ed purvo ~es of a zoning ordinance. ::\or would placing
tl.e burd.,n of s u ch provision upon the landowner appear to
h·· oppr··~sive, confi~catory, dis criminatory or unrea ~onable
sio.·l· it b the landowner whose use of the pn:Inises invites
an•: t);u~ cause~ the congestion.• ·
The validity of the requirement of off-strcl"t parking fncili-
tu g for specified uses need not be estahlisho!<l by argument
"r by analogy to other restrictions and regulat1ons helu valid.
"There arc cases which hold particular off -street park-
ing requirements invalid UJJOn the hasis of their special
arbitrariness. "\II of tltcs<', lwwHer, proceed on the
premise that off-street parking generally i,-valid." See
Hhyne, Jlu11icipal Law, 961 .•.
The decisions which uphold off-street parking gen-
~rnlly d eal in each instance with th~ l··gulity of the
specific regulation as applied to particular fact. This is
apJ•arent from the diseu;;sion in Rhyne, supra. ~o ease
that we hn>e been abl e to find irivalidak~ the pri11ciplt
l'f ofi-s treet parkin~;. For example, in City of ::\ew Or-
leans v. Leeco (In re Wimberly) ::!:?6 I.a. 335, 76 So.2d
38i, the Court enforced an off-stred parking r equire-
ment as applied to movie theatres. In Roselle,-, Wright,
37 N.J. Super. 507, 117 A.2d 661, 667, the Court held an
off-street parking requirement for a ~torage s-arnge to
be unreasonable in Yiew or its particular term~, but at
the same time recognized the Yali,lity of ~uch regulation
where it bears a substantial relationship to the public
health, safety, morals or general welfare. The Court
said:
•. _ ~ That pro>ision as applied to ~t u res, warehouses,
office building~, or oth<'r commercial ;otruetures, to
which it may rt>asonably be anticipated largE! numbers
of peopl e would come by m ~an s of aut o mobile ~, thus
gh;ng r ise to congestion in the public streets, appears
to lie entirely r easo nabl e nnd logical ... '
See al so Allendale Congregation of Jehovah's Wit-
nesse! v. Grosm an, 1950, 30 N.J. 2i3, 152 A .2rl 569 . This
• Dunham, "A L~~:al &nd Economic Tlasis for City Planning," 58
Col11111bia /_aa• Rr:1.'"1 t', 650, 666, 667 (:\lay 1958, ~o. 5).
(Cop, ria•• lhO. b1 Ard en U Jh thllo,f)
'
. .. ·. ' ..
i":.
··.
.
. '
·.
I • •
. ' ·' \ !
I .,.
,
2 I
: '
-·
•
75-4
•
0
•
. ... .: . . .. . ~
The Law o( Zoning _ and Planning Ch. 75
hold s a r equirement of one parking space for cn•ry three
scats in a church tel be reasonable.
State ex rei. Kill cl·n Realty Co . v. City of Enst Cleve-
land, t95 S, lOS Ohio App. 99, 153 KE. 2d 177,• rC"r.og-
ni7.C's that such provisions nrc valid and cites ~tcSorley
v. l"it7.g•;rald , 359 Pa. 264; 59 A.2d H2 and mnny other
cn~!'s which deal wi.~h similar end related problems.
~lir~chel v. Weisscnbe rgerr277 App. Div.l039, 100 ~.Y.S.
2·1 -1-52, recognizes the general validity of such require-
m ~uts and also holus that the vesting of authority in a
board to make particular determinations docs not con-
stitute an unlawful delec;ntion of legislative authority.
S~!l' also Fleishon '· Philadelphia Zoning Roarrl, 3S5 Pa.
295, 122 A.2d 673, and Hill '· Kesselring, 310 Ky. 43S,
220 S.W.2d S5S, 10 A.L.R.2d 1301 aud see ForonotT, The
Rrlationship of Zoning to Traffic Generators, 20 Law
and ContC'mporary Problems 197 (1955). Town of Islip
v. t'. K Summers Coal & Lumber Co ., 1931, 257 X.Y.
167. 177 :\'.E. 409, is analogous in that it upholds a zoning
ordinancl! requiring building set backs." 1
A claim that an ordinance permitting owners of busine5s
property to use adjoining re~id e ntially zoned land, if it could
be obtain••d, for off-street parking facilities to be used in
connection with the business property, was in\•alid, was re-
ject~d by the Supreme Court of ~lichignn whith held such
provision to be a r('asonnhle exc>rcise of the police power,
enacted in the interest of public safety, health and general
welfarc>, enacted in the interest of public safety, health and
general welfare, in that it represented an attempt on the
• State ~x rei. Kill~~n Realty Co. v. City of East CJe,·eland was
aff'd in 160 >l .E .2d 1 (Sup. Ct. Oh io 1959).
' City and Cou nty of Dem·er v. D~m·e r Buick, Inc ., supra. dis sent
of Doyle, J. at page 947. The majority of the court, while rccognizin~
th~ problenu caused b)· autom obile congestion, d~clared that oth~r mea-
sorts might be tak en to control it and that the r(quirement that a prop-
erty o wner de,·ote ·part of his property to off-str~et parking purposes
was confiscation of pri,·ate property for public purposes. Three judg~s
d is~en ted (rom this p3rt o( the opinion of the majori ty . See also City
and County of Denver v. Redding-:\!iller, Inc. (Sup. Ct . Cnlo . 1%0),
in wliich the court simil;~rly held th at th~ ofT-street parking provisions
of th<" Denver zoning ordinance weoe invalid .
' '
. '
.. ..
·-
·-
. .
•.
I • •
,
]-
,•
• .•
•
•
•
0
•
. ~ ... :. .. "· .. -
Off-Street Parking and Parking Lots 75-5
part of the city to protect its. ,.itizens from traffic hauuds
in business di~t ricts and to protect the business!'s thernsclves
from e<:onr11nic stran0'1llation caused by traffic congestion and
lack or f':lrking space.•
'l'ht> r·a~es in which the.courts have upheld oiT-~trcct park-
ing r•·qnir(·ments by implication, dctcroni•,i••g only whether,
in the <:n~e loefore it, the property owner has <:omplicd there:
with• or whether the particular requirement was reasonable10
• Uday , .. City of Dearborn (Sup. Ct. Mich . 1959), 96 N.W.2d 775.
~ Windsor Hills Imp. Ass'n v. ~layor & City Council of llaltimore
( ~1·1. 1, 73 A.2d 531, in which the requirement was held satisfied by
e~t:.l.>lishmcm of the required off-street parking lot on an adjoining
pkot within 300 feet from proposed multiple dwelling; l\lcKinney v.
flu:oro! of Zoning Adjustment of Kansas City Plo.), 308 S .W.2d 320,
in whoch it was held that the seating capacity of a church s.:hool cafeteria
nee I not be included in total seating capacity of church in calculating
am· -unt of rcqnircrl off-street parking bcilities : and see Summers v.
floarol ,,f Zuning Adjustment of Kans:ts City. (:\lo.), 299 S.\\ .2 J SS3,
in wl.ich it was held that a street which did nut go throu~:h the block in
which the church's proposed parking lot was located was not an "in-
te"ecr:n,.: street" within the meaning of the ordinance; Flcishon v.
Phi':t•.·:lpllia Uoard of Adjustment, 385 Pa . 295, 122 A .2rl 673 in which
peroni·s were revoked as im·aJid because no access was provided to
parki11g ~pace: Roselle v. \\'right (~-J-1955). 37 :\.]. Super. 507, 117
A .Zd •if· I. in which the denial of a permit for private storage of trucks
was : e' ersed, where ordinance required off-street p:trking; Chambers
v. Z1 •ning noard of Adjustment of Winston-Salem ( N . Car.), 108 S.E.Zd
Zll, '" which it was held that the off-street parking requirement con-
taint-! on the zoning ordinance could not be wai•·ed by the Zoning noard
of AJju>tmcnt even th ough on-street parking space might i··•·e been
snfficitnt: ~lorris,·ille Shopping Center, Inc . ,._ Board of Adjustment
( Pa. ( ·orn. Pl.). 8 llucks 263 in which the court con strued the term
"grns~ area per car" as applied to the_ size of requi rerl off-s:re~t p:uking
~p;<co ·;: Appli(ation of Garden City Jewish Center ( :\. \'. 1956), 2 :\lise.
2d 1001, 155 !\.Y.S.2d 523; State of Washingt on ex rd . Wenatchee
Con~ .. or Jcho~·ah's W itne sses V. City of Wenatchee ( 1957), 3!2 P.2d
!95. T.:rdw ood City Co mp.;ny of Jeho\'ah's Witnesses, Inc . v. City of
:\fenlo• Park (Cal. 1959), 167 :\.C .A . 77!!; Young Israel Org~niz:ttion
of C'J.·rdand \'. Dworkin (Ohio 1?56), 133 ~.E .2d 17-t: Congregation
Teon :•ll Israel v. City of Cre\'e Coeur (~lo . 1959), 320 S .\V .2d 451,
in a:J uf which the court by implication upheld ofT-street parking re-
(Cop,rchl 1960, b1 Ardu H. R.athhpfJ
. -
,._
... .. ·.··
'
I
••. _;,• I
I
, ,
•
• •
'
1-
•
~·
•
•
0
•
75-6 The Law of Z~ming and Planning Ch. 75
are even more num e rous. There is little doubt but thnt the
decision 0f Col0rado court in City nnd County of Denver
v. Dennr Buif'k. In c., supra, docs _not represent tl1c gen<\rnl
-------------------------------------·-------
quircmrnts fu r .:hurchcs as special exce(ltion uses and fo und they had
been rea soaaJ,Iy complied with.
10 R(lnJ:, •:ealty Corp .. \'. Lawton, 4 H Ill . 313 ; 111 l\.E .2J 310
(Ill. 1953 in w\1ich the requirement of pro\"i sion for o fi.-str ert parking
lor apartu .c nt ho u se s anJ not for other multiple usc buildin~;> was htld
discriminat<,ry; Board of Zo:>n i n~; Ap pt·als of D eca t u r ,._ Decat ur . Ind .
Company ,,f Jtho,·ah's \\"itnesses , 117 C\.E .2d 115 {Ind.) in which the
requirement v f otT-st reet parking s pace s for churches in propo rt i<>n to
the numbe r c•f sc ats in the church was held unreasonable; Ridge';, w C'o .
v . Board o f .o\<l just :nent of Florham Park (L Di\". S uper. Ct ~.J .
1959). 15-\ :\.2d 23 , in which the court held that a borou~:h 1oning
orJinancc r "qu:ring six square feet o l parl-:ins arc:\ lor rad• one s·p•are
loot of gros s floor area used lor IJI»in ess, commercial or p~:so n a l
senicc estaLiish m ents and retail stores in the business zan~ w•s ar-
bitrary, unreas(lua\Jie anJ not de si gned to (unher th~ propt·r purposes
of zoning . The court found that such pro,·ision was exc.e~.i,·e when
measu red loy the a\·crage parking ratios as fixed by ordinance. elsewhere
and as se en in prac tice el sewhere; ~!ah <:r \". Board of Zon ing & Appeals
(l:nreportcd, ~ \'. Sup reme Court, Svccial Term, C\.Y .L.J . Jan . 23,
1959), in whi.:h the court con>trued an ordinance which required two
square f<et of off -street parkinf: space .lor each square foot of floor
space used !ar·commercial purposes within the main building. The court
said :
" ... the term 'commercial floor space' may be the subj("(t
\"ar ieJ in terpretatio n . This is particularly tru e in entert:linrr.<·nt or
recrea tional enterpri se s . Theatres. boxi ng arena5, ice anJ r•'ller
skating rinks ut ilize the ma jo r portion of floor sp:1ce for the ac-
com moda ti o n o! spectators. F ootball, b aseball and polo fi el<l s dnote
the maj o r area of thos e facili ties to the fi elds upo n which th•· par-
tic ipants perfo r m. In short, 'commercial floor space' when applied
as a crit erion of required p a rking space is flexibk Part icu la rly in
r ec re ational enterprise it varies with the t ype a musement or rec rea-
tion pro\"ided. The nu mbe r of spect ators intended to b e acc ommo-
dated is the better norm anJ the adeqt>acy ol parkin~: bcilities when
determined in that light is a matter for d e termi n ation by a.tminis-
trati\"e officials . t:ntrss such determination is unreasonable. arbi-
. '
:
--
I • •
___ ,
I
'
.•
I f .,.
-
•
--
•
•
0
•
r,.,p \·
Off-Street Parking and Parking Lots 75·7
rul(' a1HI will represe nt an even greater minority view as the
prolJlem is considered in more juri;;dic tions.
§2. Parking Lot ~.s P)·oper Accessory Use
Till-other s:~u::.~:o:1 in..-ol..-ing parking lnts is that in which
the zoning ordinance does not require off-s treet parking but
t be propt•rty owner has claimed a right to (':;tablish off-street
parking as an accessory use oi his property •H by means of
a \·ariance.
In Buffalo Park L:me, Inc. v. Cit:··of Bufi"alo," it was held
that a hotel had the right to use a small pared of its land
in a residential zone for parking automobiles lJ{~}on g ing to its
gul'sts. The court found nothing in thP. zoning ordinance for-
bidding the use of ·meant ground belonging to or adjoining
a piece of land for automobile parking purposes and said
further that:
"The court hns no hesitancY in sa>inc: that in its
opinion the pro ..-i s ion and use· by apa~tn ;·cn t hotels of
parl:.ing space for gue>ts is a n ecessary incident of the
business of an apartment hot el and in relation to the
Zoning Ordinance an ecce3sory use of the premises of
the apartment hotel."
Parking Jots haYe been held to be accessory uses to the
principal use of adjoinins premises in a number of other
cllses.11
trary or capricious the finding of the administrati\'c: officials must
be SUSt.'lined.
State: v . City of TJ mpa , F1a . (1950), -IS So.2d i'S, ."\pplication of
Community Synagog ue,., Bates (~.Y . 1956 ), 147 ~.Y.S .2d ~0-1. afT'd
1~-1 ~.Y .S .2d 15 . I A .D.Zd t'S6. afT\! I ~.Y .2d +~:'. !36 ~.E .2d ~"3;
all of" hich in"oh·c: ofT-street p~rking regulations fo r churches as special
exception. mes.
11 Buffalo Park bne, Inc . v. City of ll ufTal o, 162 ~li se. 207, 29-1
~.Y.S . 413.
u St•te ex rei. Szodornka v. Gruber, 201 La. 1063, 10 So.2d 899
(accessory to hotel); First Xational llank & Trust Co. of Port Chester,
~.Y . ''· Zoning Co .1rd o f Appeals of Greenw ic h , 126 Conn . 228, 10
A 2d 691 (would he customarily incidental to u se of an island, if sea·
wall had been constructed as required); 13oard of Zonin~ Appeals of
(CI'pyric~t 1960. b~ Ard ra H RunoJ<f]
'
. .
~ '.
:
·.
I • •
'
]-
--·-( ~ ·-
•
•
0 -
CITY OF TUSTIN MAY 11, 1970
THRU: City Administrator
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT: MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARKING
STANDARDS
The City Council has expressed concern over the adequacy
of parking standards for multi-family residential de-
velopments within the City of Tustin.
This report is an attempt to determine the adequacy of
accommodations and parking area problems of the City of
Tustin by comparison with other communities, observations,
analysis of existing situations and recommendation for
remedial actions.
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS -Apartment House Parking
Tustin:
Bachelor apartments One (1) parking space
One bedroom apts. One and one half(l~)
Two bedroom apts. One and one half(l~)
Three or more bedrooms -Two (2)
Los Angeles County Association of Planning Officials (Hodel
Standards) :
Two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit.
Orange County Zoning Code:
One and one half (1~) per dwelling unit.
Urban Land Institute:
Two (2) parking spaces per dwelling unit.
City of Los Angeles:
One (1) space for each dwelling unit less than
three habitable rooms.*
One and one half (1~) spaces for each dwelling
unit of three habitable rooms.
'
,_
I . •
.. ,
. \ ! f I
"
]-
]
•
•
• -
~wv;~~L: MULt1-Family Residential
Parking Standards 5/11/7~
Two (2) spaces for each dwelling unit of more
than three habitable rooms.
*(A one bedroom apartment would requ i re 1~ parking
.spaces; kitchens are defined by ordinance as a
habitable room;)
Table II of the Apartment Parking Survey dated October, 1968,
presents comparative parking requireme nts for cities in Orange
ao~~·y, to r e fl e ct latest amendments.
On a comparative basis, Tustj,n standards are ·equal to the
average requirements of cities but less than those proposed
by model ordinances.
Ratio of Cars to Units
The Building Industry Association of California, Inc. con-
tracted in May 1, 1969, for an analysis of automobile owner-
ship and park i ng requirements for multi-family residences
in Orange County cities. The results of the study indicated
an average of 1.4 vehicles per unit. However, in three-bed-
room units that catered to family type living for adults and
children, the occupancy rate was three and four persons with
a high of 2.6 vehicles per unit.l
The following extracted statistics pertain to Tustin Apart-
ment Complexes.
No. of No.of Building Name Address Units Cars Ratio
Castilian 14330 Newport Ave. 117 123 1.08
Casa Ganar 15520 Tustin Village 82 113 1. 35
Way
Segovia 15!.f;J Tustin Village 86 117 1. 36
Way
Occupancy standards for multi-family developments within the
City of Tust i n indicates 2.206 occupants per unit in the R-3
(1750) Districts and 1.574 occupants per unit in the R-3 (1250)
District.2
-------------------------------------------------------------------1) B.D.F. Corporation, Fullerton, California, June 6, 1969.
2) State Department of Finance Census Certification.
Page 2
'
. ,
. '
I • •
f 2
-
~ .
I .l
f
t . .
•
Subject:
•
• •
Multi-Family Residential
Parking Standards
5/ll/70
The State Department of Motor Vehicles indicates automobile
registration in Orange County is equivalent to one vehicle
for each adult. Based on the occupancy d e n si ty of apartment
houses within the City of Tustin, 1.89 parking spaces would
be required for each adult unit. Family units with children
of driving age could result in an even higher demand for
parking accorunodations.
Field Inspections
Fire Chief Morgan Hilton, approximately 18 months ago, made
a survey of apartment house parking at 5:00 A.M. on a Sunday
morning.
His survey disclosed cars parked on the streets surrounding
apartment houses with varying degrees of available ~n-site
parking as follows: Street
Bldg. Name Location Units Parking Vacant On-Site
Palmwood 467 E. 1st. 102 4 5
Tustin Acres 650 w. Main 180 Numerous 30\
Tustin Village Way 15500 Tustin 234 Numerous Adequate for all
Village Way cars on street
The Community Development Director surveyed apartment house
parking at midnight, Thursday, May 7, 1970, with the ~ollowing
observations:
Bldg. Name Location Units
Tustin Acres 650 w. Main 180
Las Campanas 1082 lain 38
Williamshire 15500 Williams 119
Tustin Arms u 15701 Tustin Village 120
Way
The Enrique 15660 Tustin Village 84
Way
Village west 15610 Tustin Village 76
Way
Aspens 15652 Williams 130
(a) Vacant spaces were to rear of project
along freeway.
Page 3
Street Vacant
Parking On-Site
36 67
3 10
0 sa
Numerous Adequate
Numerous Adequate
Numerous Adequate
Numerous Adequate
'
. .
(a)
I· •
, ·. .· \ !
I
'r
-
r.
•
•
• •
Subject: Multi-Family Residential
Parking Standards
Bldg. Name
Hampton Sq.
Location
16411 Me<Fadden
Rancho San Juan Red flill & San Juan
(County)
Valencia Gardens 15742 Williams
Winston
Luxury
Republic ·
1132 Bryan
16561 Alliance
15481 Wi11iams
Street
Units Parking
350 Numerous
165
93
28
224
8
0 (c)
9
Solid
0
(b) Inconvenient location of available spaces.
(c) Property wall made street parking inconvenient.
(d) High vacancy -new project.
Findings
5/11/70
Vacant
On-Site
Adequate
16 (b)
Adequate
Adequate
10
250 (d)
The 16500 block of Alliance Street has a critical parking
problem. The four-plexes on the· south side of Alliance Street
are hopelessly inadequate for off-street parking. The garages
are sub-standard in size, poorly lighted, and nearly impossible
to use. A compact car is the only vehicle that could utilize
these off-street parking spaces.
All other observed apartment areas of the City had a sufficient
number of off-street parking spaces to accommodate the vehicles
parked on the surrounding streets. (This same observation was
made by the Pire Chief 18 months ago.) However, the number of
on-site parking spaces neither assured adequacy nor use.
Tustin Village Way ir \n example of sufficient number of on-site
parking spaces that are vacant while there is an abundance of
on-street parking. It appears obvious that tenants will park
their vehicles at the closest, most convenient place, and on
the street in preference to a remote on-site parking place.
When apartment houses were set back from the street, interiorly
oriented, and surrounded by a perimeter wall, there was a
greater tendency to use the on-site parking facilities. Ve-
hicles were parked on the street when on-site accommodations
were available. However, in the majority of these instances,
the parking spaces were inconvenient to the units served, poorly
lighted and remote.
Page 4
I . •
,
-
•
•
0 -
--..~---· ··-----.
Parking Standards
The Williamshire Apartments repres e nted the City's desire
with adequate parking accommodations and no on-street
parking. Parking spaces were well lighted, numbered,
named, and convenient to the units served.
Only in rare instances did any apartment complex designate
a convenient area for guest parking.
Analysis
Parking standards for multi-f~mily developments in Tustin
are adequate for present occupancy. They are not adequate
to accommodate the trends toward family occupancy of apart-
ment houses and ownership of a vehicle by each adult.
Neither do apartment complexes provide necessary accommoda-
tions for guest parking.
The design of apartment complexes to assure convenience of
on-site parking spaces and interior orientation to avoid
the use of street parking is a matter of concern to the
Development Preview Committee. They will continue to
exercise jurisdiction to gain this objective.
The City Council should be cognizant that it is highly un-
likely that any change will be made in the parking standards
for Orange County. Apartment houses will be built within
the sphere of influence of the City of Tustin, but under
Orange County standards. If the standards of the City of
Tustin impose an extreme hardship (from the developer's
viewpoint) for off-street parking, over and above the
standards of the County, it can be assumed that the de-
velopments will take place outside of the incorporated
limits and outside of City design standards. Yet, the
City of Tustin will inherit the problems of the future for
those developments which take place within the boundaries
of its ultimate limit~.
The apartment house parking survey and staff recommendations
were considered by the Planning Commission on November 12,
1968. The matter was continued and no final action was
taken upon the staff proposal. The preponderance of testi-
mony presented to the Planning Commission was in opposition
to any increase in parking requirements for multi-family
developme nts. Attached hereto is a copy of the parking sur-
vey presented to the Planning Commission on November 12, 1968.
It is apparent that an increase in off-street parking re-
quirements for multi-family developments will receive less
than enthusiastic support.
Recommendation
The study conducted by the Planning Staff in 1968, as sup-
plemented by current surveys, indicates that parking
-5-
;-
•.
I • •
.• \ I
I ' !
-
•
•
•
·, •
. ;:,u.u J t:'-' '-; r1u.L "t..L -.r·ctml.J.Y .t<es1.aent:1.aJ.
Parking Standards
5/ll/70
problems were created in large -measure by the developments
prior to 1966. It is also believed that current develop-
ments will create future . problems. The staff recommends
the following multi-family parking standards;
Bachelor & One Bedroom Apartments -1~ parking spaces.
TWo Bedroom Apartments . -2 parking spaces.
Three or More Bedroom Apartments -2~ p~rking spaces.
Not less than 10% of total parking spaces to be
conveniently located and designated for guest
parking.
If it is the desire of the City Council to protect against
future parking congestion and obsolescence by the adoption
of model ordinance standards, it is recommended that this
report be referred to the Planni~g Commission for the
scheduling of a public hearing and recommendation of an
amendment of the Zoning Or~inance to the City Council.
Respectfully submitted,
fi,~ ..f..,eu?a,
R. Kenneth Fleagle
Ass't CA -Community
Development Director
RKF/jat
enclosure:
-6-
. '
• .
I • •
·' I I
I ' .,.
' "
•
• 0
"' ~ • •
, _._ ....
~···a; fk I • %-¥~U;~•t;w•.!~:~"'S?!':"!1%~~·~._...!!", z ~ _.,.,_ = ~ j -'c e --=-:: '!!1. -.
,. Page 2 revised by RKF 5/ll/70
PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERATION
NOVEMBER 12, 1968
APAR'l'MENT PARKING SURVEY
CITY OF TUSTIN
CALIFORNIA
BY PLANNING DEPAR'l'MENT
OCTOBER 1968
The following indivuals spoke in opposition to
increased parking requirements:
George Argyros
Robert Hall
Gared Smith
Kenneth Nelson
Charles Greenwood
No final ·action taken on proposed increase
in parking standards •
I
I
~
•
' .
l
'·
raa• '
'Introduction
As a result of increasing concern among City Councilmen about the adequacy of parking facilities in apartment districts, the Council
requested that the Planning Commission study the problem and make a report of their findings. This report is a compilation of in-
formation obtained by Planning D~p~rcment personnel, an analysis of the information and a recommended iaplementation program.
D.lckground
Apartment development in the City ~.;;:.?Tustin has enjoyed a very dynamic period of growth during tbe 1960's. 'l'tle buildiD& sllDp which
has affected many communities in the late 60's has not slowed the development of apartment units in Tustin .. vitoessed by tbe statistics
in Table I ~low.
TABLE I
April 1966 April 1967 April 1968
Units '7. Units 'X. Units 'X.
Single Family 2061 51 2252 47 2684 47
Multiple Family i980 49 ...ll?.Q_ 53 ..1QiL 53
Total 4041 4802 5726
The developments sUDIQ&rized above took place under the present parking regulations which were adopted in Jaauary, 1966 &Dd ·are as followa:
Type Unit
Bachelor
l Bedroom
2 Bedroom
3 or more Bedrooms
(in each case, one space per unit must be
Spaces/Unit
1
1%
1-l
2
covered)
T h ~ above require~nts do not give credit for on-street parking spaces and ·~t be considered to provide for guest parking in other
t h.1n on-street s pac~es. A tour of apartoent areas during early morning hours quickly indicates, however, that parking needs are not
sd cqu.ne ly served on the site. Severe parking problems are foUDd on Pasadena Avenue and Tustin Village Way!!!!!. though · ill spaces
~ .!!2£. utili zed 2!!. site.
PArk 1ng <tandards in Tustin can be compared with those of other Orange County cities in Table II (next page). Twelve cities have leas
ur u .gcr.t requirements than Tustin, eight have more stringent requirements, one city baa ~ s ... requir-nt ~ ooe (Villa Park) does
DOt permit apartments.
•
• •
I! • ·--. ~
,.....
"
.....
__ ...
·.
L .-·~
•
' "
•
CITY
A.na~ci::t
B~·cn
Bucr..:1 P.-"lr k
C o~t :1 ~<c s :t
C ·:.-.."!:"-.~.:;
?c:::u:: i -. \'.:1l l cv
l-:!~'d P r. Grove
Fullc:-ton
H u:·.~in g ton Bch.
L 3~.;r..:t B~ach
L:. l!ai>ra
L.l PaL-:-..:1
Los Al=itos
~:cw?ort Beach
r :.!n Q,~
P iacenti.:l
BACH.
TABLE II
PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN ORANGE COUNTY
1968
1 BD~~ 2 BDRM 3 or More Gara~e Ooen Carport Stall
Provision for
allc v . backinsr
•
• •
P3~e 2
::isc .
Rcn.lr~s
, • 1 n"r u:11~.
~
,-----,-. -.. -I I l I I I I
I. H;\\-1 1l.!;IY ... ! 1~1 >-_1 1~-'·t Y~s -10'x20' \\:s P~.1 c~veredlo;;c=o
I R4 H:' R41 ~ I R4 2 i R4 2 I 1 I I Yes llO'x20' Yes I R3 2/u:oi t ' ·r 11; l i? 1 1 ~ 1 lls I 1. ~----1-Ye_s ___ no··x201 1 Yes
, I \ ! Fron 1 - 7 unit complex 1
i I I i 2 s oac cs oer unit
l l l; I l l; I 2
2
-~-'It. , z ~. , .. j --i ~,-,.. f ..... , -
2
I I 1 ~ l )(1~r 2 I 2 .Yz..
1 1 I 1 I I 9 'x 20 •
I l l; I l; I No I 9 'x20 •
I Yes ~-----I No 1 10'x20 '
'I'" ~~~·-"1 I Yes I 9 'xl9 1
Yes I Ye5 if 6'--l
wail is
surroundin~t
sldx2o'
Ye s
* *
i:
·::
For SO u~its 1/u~ ~~us
28 O:le:'. S':;JCCS
Carport=:; be ii •:'s
not vis ib 1::.
1 on-s~r~et ~a=~!~; 1!
oe~ittec if oos s i~l~.
I
j
1 1 I .L~ . I i 1 on-street for I ·I (1 must be covered)! 2 Yes Yes Yes '9 1 x19' * guests.
1 1 -·
(1 must hE
j I I J Over 1000 sq . it . •
I 1 ~ 1 I 1 I 1 Yes Yes 10 'x20' Yes 2 parkin:; s t~•.::es ;;cr
(50% nust be covered ) unit
I 1!.; ' 1!; '! ll;
(l mus t ibe cove r e d) I 2 I 2
, ( 1 r:n:s t :b e enclosed)!
2
I 1 ~ ,. 1\---~ I ( ~ must be :.Overed
l I l
i 1 I
I I
(1 must be covered)
I 1 1 I Garden Ap ts
I & R3 : .
I' 2 l 2
R4 -1~ l~ must oe in
I!.:Jra<?:e in a 11
1
2
l}a
2
-w .
1
1
2
Yes Yes I 9 1 x20'
Yes Yes 110 1x20 1
Yes I No 110 'x20 1 .
Yes No I 9 1 x20 1
Yes I Yes No I 9 1 x20 1
Yes Yes Yes 110 1x20 1
*
*
It is decided on
the orecise o1an.
Yes
*
*
Nore th~n 4 ut. r~
quires i adctl. par~.
space
~ore t han 10 u:s.
addtl ~ oa=kin~ s=~ce.
, In R-4 all in i;ar01se
(!' -~ ~~
'\. . . ~
"
.-......
•
I
'
•
•
\,,.Lr.)'
Sari Clemente
San Juan
Capi s trano
Santa An.:t
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tustin
Villa Park
Wcstministcr
....... ~··· ... ., .......... ---·-· puElex Res. & R3G
li-;/ut in allj
R-3 1/ut in all
R-4 & R-5 1~/ut in all
tv pes
1 H; li
1 1~ 1%
(None of them has to
be cnc los ed ) I
l i ut for a .ll types
(All must be covered)
1.\j 1i 1~
1 1~ 1%
TABLE II
PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN ORANGE COUNTY
1968
--· ··-·-....,_ .. _--.. -·
Yes Yes
2 Yes No
li Yes Yes Yes
Yes No
2 Yes i No
2 Yes Yes
Thev have no apt regulation standards
1~ 1.\j 2 I 2% .Is
1 open %. open
I
'(orba_j.inda _____ Until July l, 1968 the County Zoning Ordinance is used •.
·-_._ ___
9'xl9'
9 x20
9'x20'
9'x20'
10'x20'
9'x20'
10'x20'
* -Backing to the portion of street right of way and direct access to parking spaces or through alleya
are resulated by Review Boards, when precise development plan is submitted.
•
""' • •
-.
'P•&• l L
Provision for Misc • ---... --... ~··· ,._ ·~~
All parking spaces
muat be covered.
Yes
Yea PO calls for 1
additional open
parkina space.
Yes R-4 garden apartC~ent
requires l enclosed
Yes
* Their definition of a
carport is same as
~taraae.
* l covered
*
•
f( • • -»
' ~
•
.:
I ,.--,
Pace 4
De si gne r -De ve loper Comme nts
In an attempt to obta i n comments relative to the adequacy of our present parking requirements a letter requesting such comments
wa s maile d to eighteen groups and individuals. Included within the group were Architects, Building Designers, Developers, Real
Estate Sa lesmen, the Building Industries Association and the Chamber of Commerce. The responaes are included in the appendix of
this report.
Of the five responses so far received, the general feeling was that our present requirements are adequate. One response felt that
the requirements should be increased by one-half space across the board. Another recommended an increase of 1/8 space per unit
for gue st parking with credit for on-street parking.
Te nan t I nterview
TI1 e op1n1on s of apartment unit tenants was obtained through interview of a sampling of tenants in 19 apartment complexes. Althouah
the sampling was minimal it is felt that the information derived is useful.
Thirty-e i ght interviews were made asking eight questions. Of the units interviewed, One Bedroom Units averaged 2.3 residents and
1.3 automobiles. Two Bedroom Units, averaged 2.4 residents and 1.63 automobiles. Three Bedroom Units averaged 3.7 residents and
1 .67 automobiles.
Three questions were ~ske~ which solicited an opinion from the tenant being interviewed:
1. Are parking spaces convenient to your apartment unit?
2. Would you be willinS to sacrifice open space to have
parking spaces located closer to your apartment?
3. Are guest spaces available? Y/N
adequate? Y/N
convenient? Y/N
______ Y/N
_______ Y/N
Only 4 t e nant s felt that parking spaces were not convenient to his unit and only 5 ten&Ats would agree to sacrifice open apace to
have s paces closer to the unit. The questions relative to guest parking spaces elicited a more significant response; approxtmately
one-half of the persons felt that guest spaces were not available, were not adequate and were DOt convenient.
•
• •
,.----. --~~-. ··~.
\ }J
.......,
0
' L
' •
I
. ·
~
Clty of Tustin
Name of Complex No. & Type of
Units in Complex
No. of Interviews Bach. lbr. 2br. 3br.
Palmwood Gardens 79 23
1
2
3
4
5
Rancho Yorba 28 lZ
1
:!
3
Tustin Acres (11 10) • 1
2
Town Center Aparts. 16
1
2
~Wins ton-P'K.Gdns.
1
2
Tust:a.n Square 5b
1
2
Wilnbleton Hall 34 10
1
~17ob2car1aiin Circle 3 1
1
Trinidad Apartments 22 32
1
2
Newport Ga1axie Apts 9 48 36
1
2
The Castilian 92 25
1
rrhe Sc ~ovia . 48 38
1
2
·-\·t Uagc West 52 24
' 1
I
I I I
Parking
Cov. IOocn
97 45
40 20
180 90
16 8
:Ill plus
44 1b
4 2
S4 27
93 47
121 56
8b 4J
52 24
TABLE Ill
APAR'lMENl' PAIUUt«< SURVEY
October 1968
Parki:J' Type No. of !
Space Unit lrera. !Autos
Interviewed 1 in ut. ·Owned Unit.
1.39
2 bdrm. 3 2
2 bdrm. 4 1
2 bdrm. 2 2
2 bdrm. 3 2
2 bdrm. 2 2
1.5
1 bdrm. 2 1
1 bdrm. 2 1
2 bdrm. 2 2
1.5
2 bdrm. 3 1
2 bdrm. 3 1
1.5
2 bdrm. 2 1
2 bdrm. 2 2
2 bdrm. 3 2
2 bdrm. 4 2
'l
2 bdna. 2 1
2 bdna. 2 1
1.36
2 bdra. 2 2
1.5
2 bdna. 2 2
1.5
2 bdna. 2 2
2 bdna. 3 2
1.09
1 bdna. 3 2
2 bdna. s 2
1.51
2 bdrm. 2 1
2 bdrm. 2 1
1.5
2 bdrm. 2 2
2 bdrm. 2 2
.L,U
2 'bdnl. 2 1 . . •
'
.
Parkin& I Are
Cbarae. Rent I Spaces
l.es St. lsD&ee• Conven.
I
2 Yes No
1 Yes Yes
1 1 Yes Yes
1 1 Yes No
1 1 Yes Yes
1 No Yes
1 No Yes
1 1 No Yes
1 No Yes
1 No Yes
1 No Yes
1 1 No Yes
2 No Yea
2 No Yes
1 No Yes
1 No Yes
2 No Yea
1 1 No Yes
1 1 No Yes
1 1 No No
2 No Yes
2 No Yes
1 No Yes
1 No Yes
1 1 No Yes
1 1 No Yes
1 No Ye*
-.
•
• •
,.,. s
P1aan1na Department
r ·w
~.~n .
Space for Guest Spa~ea
addtl. Pka.~ AvailabletAdequa. •Convenient
No No. No. No.
No Yes Yes Yes.
flo No No No
Yes No No No
Yes No No No :
Yes Yes Yes Yu
llo Yes Yes Yes
No Yes Yes Yes
No Yes No Yes
No No No No
No No No No -:
No No No No j
'
No Yes Yes Yea i
No Yes Yes Yes
No Yes • Yea Yes
No Yea No Yes •
No Yea Yes Yes
No No No No
No No No No
No No No No ,
No Yea Yes Yes
No Yes · Yes Yes
No Yes Yes Yes
No Yes Yea Yes
No No No No
No No No No
I Yes No No' Jlo I
!
I
# -
~
•
. ·
~
I
•
~
City of Tustin
Name of Complex No. & Type of
Units in Complex
No . of Interviews Bach. lbr. 2br.l3br.
Williamshire 28 56 35
1
2
Tustin Anns 20 80 20
1
-NE-cor. -wTifiams& 16
Alliance
1
Tustin Village il2 (114 uts -l,z,j,4
bedrooms)
1
2
3
Holida y Gardens 34 24
1
2
Mci Ling 68 J.4
1
c
TABLE 1II (Continued)
APAR'lMENr PARKING SURVEY
October 1968
Type No. of I Parkin~!
Parking ' Spaces Unit Pers. Autos
Cov. I OPen Unit. Interviewed in ut. Owned
119 60 1.5
2 bdrm. 3 2
3 bdrm. 4 1
120 60 1.5
2 bdrm. 2 2
16 J..U
2 bdrm. 3 1
1
3 bdrm. 3 2
2 bdrm. 4 1
3 bdrm. 4 · 2
60 26 1.48
2 bdnn. 1 1
2 bdrm. 2 2
82 24 1.29
2 bdrm. 2 2
2 bdnn. 2 2
3-lbdrm.
32-2bdrm
3-3bdrm.
•
• •
Pace 6
Planning Department
Parking Are Sac. Open
Charac. Rent Spaces Space for Guest Spaces
Res St Soace Conven. addtl. Pk& Available A!iequa .
2 No Yes No Ye s Yes
1 _No No Yes Yes Yes
2 No Yes No Yes No
1 No Yes No Ye s Yes
2 No Yes No No No
1 No Yes No No No
2 No Yes No Yes Yes
1 No Yes No Yes No
1 1 No Yes No "No No
1 1 No Yes No No No
1 1 No Yes No No No
Conclusive evidence could not be obtained by calculating statistics on the apartment developments as a whole either. Complexes with st=ilar
parking spaces per unit and parking spaces per bedroom ratios appear to have differiD& parking characteristics. This tact may indicate that
the design of the complex plays a significant role in parking characterietics.
'-.
__ ,...
!
Conven..
Yes
Yes
1'\o
I
Yes
No
Ne
Yes
No
No
No
:O,:o
I
"
•
. ..
1-
/-
~
'-
~
:ity of Tustin
C o~lex
l. Pnlmwood Gardens ----
2. Rancho Yorba
3. Tu s tin Acres
----
4. To~~ Center Apts.
5. Winston Pk.Gardens
s . Tustin Square
7. Wimbleton Ha ll
8. 170 62 Carlann Cir.
9. Trinidad Apa rt.
lO. Newport Gal~~ie ----
Ll. The Castilian
---
12. The Segovia
-
13. Village West
.4 . 1./illiamshire
-
.5. Tustin Arms
b. SE cor. Hilliams
I . &_Allinnce
.7. Tu s tin Villang #2
----
.8. Hv l ldd y Gard ens
.. ---
9. ~!c i Ling
"· ... ·-,·~-.. --.. ........._ ____ ....... -·---·"'
TABLE IV
APARTMEI'lr PARKING SURVEY (Continued)
October 1968
0\ elling Unit s I Parking
Bach.' 1 br. 2 br. 3 br. Total Cov. QQe_n Total
I 79 23 I 102 97 45 142
28 12 40 40 20 60
-
16 16 16 8 . 24
j
Break?own not
1
avai1able
1
I I
Breakdown not available
34 10 44 44 16 60
3 1 4 ·4 2 6
22 32 54 54 27 81
9 48 36 93 93 47 140
92 25 117 121 56 177
48 38 86 86 43 129
52 24 76 76 39 115
I 28 56 35 119 119 60 179
20 80 20 120 120 .60 180 :
I 16 I 16 16 16
Breakdown not available
34. 24 58 62 28 90
68 14 82 82 24 106
~ .
Total Parking Spaces/
Bedrooms Unit
227 1.39
52 I 1.50
32 1.50
54 1.36
9 1.50
86 1.50
213 1.51
142 1.51
124 1,50
100 1.51
245 1.50
240 1.50
32 1.00
82 1.55
96 1.29
•
• •
·---... -~.-, ..... , ~~
Planni.ng Department \.._._-
Parking Spaeea
Bedroom ZoninR
0.63 R-4
1.15 R-3
PO
0.75 R-3 I
PO
R-3
1.11 R-3 I
0.67 · R-3
0.94 R-3
0.66 roo-c-2-2o.ooo l
1.25 R-3
1.04 R-3
1.15 R-3
------
0.73 P0-2700
--0.75 R-3
0.50 R-3
PO
1.10 R-3 • .
1.10 1.-3 ---
I
'
•
..
0
I
•
• •
••&e a
Conclusions
It appears that a slight increase is warranted for two bedroom units and that increased attention should be given to guest parkin&•
Incre as es should not be made, however, at the expense of needed open space.
Although signi ficant problems exist on both Pasadena and Tustin Village Way, it would not necessarily be advantageous to ban on-
street pa rking in the area if there are not enough off-street spaces. It can also be argued that the public streets are designed
to pe rmit on-street parking. Certainly adjacent property owners have a right to utilize such on-street parkins unless such use
adversely affects the public welfare,
Based upon our study of parking characteristics in apartment districts, the following stands~Js are suaiested,
Type of Unit
Bachelor
One Bedroom
Two Bedroom
Three or More Bedroom
* At least one parking space per unit shall be provided in a garage or carport.
Spaces/Unit*
1
1.5
1.75
2
In a ddi tion to the above required spaces, a mintmum of one (1) on-site open or covered parking space shall be provided for guest parking
for ea ch ten (10) dwelling units or fraction thereof. Said spaces shall be marked for "guest parking" and the convenience of said spaces
to visitor s shall be considered by the Architectural C~ittee when plans are considered for Architectural Review.
Cl:u~y ~~~ning Director
.JLS/jat
r • ' .:\. • lJ
'-.
\_.
•
-
•
•
•
0
•
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
via Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
FROM : City Planning & Zoning Commission
SUBJECT: Amendment of Parking Regulations in Residential
Districts
The City Planning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting May
18, 1971, voted 7-0 (two members absent) to recommend repeal
of parking regulations in individual ~t !Sidential districts
and to amend §22.5-Sa(lO) of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
to change residential parking requirements as follows:
From:
----One (1) off-street parking space/dwelling unit.
12= Type of Unit Requil·ed Off-Street Parking
Single-Fam1ly DWellings ••••••• Two (2) spaces/unit
Two or More Family Dwellings
Efficiency Unit •••••••••• One (1) space/unit
One or Two Bedroom
Units ••••••••••.••.• One and one-half (1-1/2)
spaces/unit.
Three or 1\lore Bedroom
Units ••••••••••••.•• Two (2) spaces/unit
Res~:tted,
~~S L. SUPINGER ~
Director of Planning
For
City Planning & Zoning Commission
gw
enc: Staff Report dated May 4, 1971
l\11nutes of May 4, and May 18.
Ra t hkopf on Zoning Reprint
Tusti~ California Parking Study
cc: Architects
Developers
Chamber of Commerce
May 21, 1971
,_
'·
I • •
. ' .• \ ! '
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -1-
Staff Repor·t Re:
•
0
•
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Case #9-71
Proposed amendment of parking regulations for residential
uses.
Date to be Considered:
May 4, 1971
~£!..._~1~:
City of Englewood
Request:
The amendment of §22.5-5 a (10) of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance. (Parking regulations for residential uses.)
FROM:.
One (1) space per dwelling unit
TO: One Family Residential Unit---Two (2) spaces per unit
Two or More Dwelling Units
Efficiency Unit------------One (1) space per un~t.
One or Two Bedroom Units---One and one-half (1 1/2)
spaces per unit.
Three or more Bedroom Units---Two (2) spaces per
unit.
Subject Area:
All Rc idential Zone Districts (R-1-A, R-1-B, and R-1-C
Single-family Residential; R-2-A and R-2-B Two-family Residen-
tial ; R-3 -A and R-3-B Multi-family Residential; and R-4 Residen-
tial /P ofcs si onal.)
Background of Previous Action:
The 1955 Zoning Ordinance established the present ratio
of one pa r king space per dwelling unit and the ratio was not
changed with the adoption of the 1963 0 dinance. Since that
time and particularly in the last several years with the in-
creased apa r tment house construction and the crowding of streets
in all residential areas---single family zone districts in-
cluded, there has been considerable informal discussion as to
the inadequacy of this ratio. No official action has been
taken until this time.
. '
•.
I • •
.· \ I
I ' '!
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -1-
~taff Repor·t Re:
•
0
•
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Case #9-71
Proposed amendment of parking regulations for residential
uses.
Date to be Considered:
May 4, 1971
Name £!_Applicant:
City of Englewood
Request:
The amendment of §22.5-5 a (10) of the Comprehensive
Zontng Ordinance. (Parking regulations for residential uses.)
FROM:. One (1) space per dwelling unit
TO: One Family Residential Unit---Two (2) spaces per unit
Two or More Dwelling Units
Efficiency Unit------------One (1) space per un~t.
One or Two Bedroom Units---One and one-half (1 1/2)
spaces per unit.
Three or more Bedroom Units---Two (2) spaces per
unit.
Subject Area:
All Residential Zone Districts (R-1-A, R-1-B, and R-1-C
Single-family Residential; R-2-A and R-2-B Two-family Residen-
tial; R-3 -A and R-3-B Multi -family Residential; and R-4 Residen-
tial/Professional.)
Background of Previous Action:
T~e 1955 Zoning Ordinance established the present ratio
of one parking space per dwelling unit and the ratio was not
changed with the adoption of the 1963 Ordinance. Since that
time and particularly in the last several years with the in-
creased apartment house construction and the crowding of streets
in all residential areas---single family zone districts in-
cluded, there has been considerable informal discussion as to
the i nadequacy of this ratio. No official action has been
taken until this time.
• l
•.
I • •
I !
I
,
'!
1
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -2-
•
0 -
Planning D~partment Recommendation:
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Case #9-71
It is recommended that §22.5-5 a (10) of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance (parking regulations for residential uses) be
amended as follows:
One Family Residential Unit--------Two (2) spaces per
unit.
Two or more Dwelling Units:
Efficiency Unit------------------One (1) space per
unit.
One or Two Bedroom Units---------One and one-half (1 1/2)
spaces per unit.
Three or More Bedroom Units------Two (2) spaces per
unit.
Comments from Other Departments:
'Fire: "Traffic and parking conge.stion is one of major
cor.cernoy all c1.ty departments, but,probably mor~ especially
the Fir·e Department since we rely greatly upon the movement
of fire trucks and ladder trucks, and our efficiency depend
to some degree upon the proximity to which we may approach an
emergency.
"The heavy parking cor.gestion and traffic associated with
apartment complex have come to our attention and was part of
the cons'ideration when we recommended and was successful in
the Council having adopted Ordinance #4, Series of 1971 (copy
attached). This does not necessarily regulate the amount of
parking spaces, but it could and does give us the authority to
reduce parking spaces in private parking areas where additional
fire lanes, or ingress is required by emergency vehicles. We
would hope that this would not be necessary around small apart-
ment units.
"We agree that to deal adequately with this parking problem,
the extension of the Ordinance to require additional parking
space-. se~ms to be a reasonable approach".
Police : The concern of the Police Department is related
to auTos, campers, vans, etc. pa1·king on-street too close to
intersections and driveways, thus causing visibility and turning
p oblems.
,._
• <
I • •
'
-
•
•
0
•
STAFF REPORT PARKING REQUIREMENTS
~e -_3_---------------------------·--------C~a~s~e~#~9_-_7~1 __________ __
Public Works (Traffic):
parkiiig"'-r-equiremer.ts for new
justification for a change in
for each unit,
"The present 'off-street
apartment units have proven
the number of stalls required
"At this time the on-street parking is being fully utilized in
the locale of these buildings, thereby causing complaints from
single family residences.
''It is recommended the present requirement of one stall per
unit be raised to 1 1/2 stalls for a one-bedroom unit and 2
stalls for each larger unit."
Planning Department: Concerns relative to the adequacy
of off-street parlting in residential areas have been well-
known among the Planning Department staff and the Planning
·Commission for some time. Rumors have been circulating for
some time among d~velopers and Architects that the City was
going"to increase its off-street parking requirements.
From inspection of residential areas the staff has come to the
opinion that the change should be made now rather than waiting
for the complete new zoning ordinance, The proposed change
will base parking on the number of bedrooms in the dwellipg
unit. This has been found to be a successful way of gauging
the amount of parking spaces needed, particularly in multiple
family areas, which constitute most of our new residential
construction.
It should be noted that the provision of additional off-street
parking will not necessarily solve the problem of on-street
parking. This problem will only be lessened if off-street
spaces are more convenient for the users than are the on-
street space~ An ordinance is presently being developed
which will restrict parking near intersections because of
visibility problems. On-street parking near driveways has
resulted in drivers having to turn into the driveways from
the wrong lane resulting in a violation.
Auother problem caused by the present massive use of on-street
pa king is that there is little or no space for parking of
delivery and service vehicles. Consequently, they double park.
Parking p oblems are not unique to Englewood, Denver has
recently changed its standard in multiple family areas to 1 1/2
spaces per dwelling unit. Aurora and Littleton are considering
changes as follows:
•.
I • •
. , •' \ l
' ' .,.,
]~-
•
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -4-
Aurora
•
• •
PARKING REQUIREMENTS
Case #9-71
Sir.gle Family ••..•.•.••..••••.••• 2 spaces/dwelling unit
Multipi~ family
1 & 2 bedroom units ••.•••••.••• l 1/2 spaces/dwelling
unit.
3 bedroom units ••.••..•••.••••• 2 spaces/dwelling unit
4 or more bedroom units ••••.••• 2 1/2 spaces/dwelling
unit.
Lit tieton ·-,-----
Singh .":"amily •••.••...•.•••..•.•• 2 spaces/dwelling unit
Multiple Family •.•••.•••.•.•••••• 1 1/2 spaces/dwelling
unit.
·We hav~ b~en told by several developers that this proposed
change will cause r~sid~ntial dev~lopment to stop and the City
will rose new tax base. Two general answers to this are
appropriate:
1. Residential uses, except those of ultra-high value, do not
•·pay thei way" from a property tax point of view.
2. The city should not be saddled with problems caused by developm~nts, but should learn from experience and establish
standards which will not result 1n problems.
The Planning Department recommends approval of the proposed up-
graded off-treet parking requirements for residential develop-
ments. ·
Resp:~:~'~'"d, r~r-J
S L. SUPINGE~ {/
jYD1 ector of Planning ~
/'
cc: Arch l tects
Developers
Chamber of Commerce
. ....
,._
..
I • •
·. . ' .• \ !
' I ' '!'
]-
•
~tt: Ci~y Of ~n e lewood
)400 ~. B l~ti S treet
~n g l eNoo 0 , Co lo.
To Tn om It 1 1 ~y Concer,1:
.. -'.#
•
0
•
l la.y 17, 1971
.i e t h e u :1ue rsi c ·1ed, 1.s ow .1e rs and t'l.X )-':yer s of pro p erty o n 'l e st 13'-lk er Ave •
.Sn ~,;le wo o ,Colo. wis n to protest, to wu ..J.t 'N C co !13 i oer a11 i '!ljus~ice, by the city
of Ent;l ":w ood.
7e have reference to the r e cent s urvey by the city eng in<c rs for t h e proposed
pavin~;, curb, and gutter of 'lest 'Sak r Ave.
'7e prote s t to t h e re ~ov ~l or re plac e 1ent of a ny property st~ke s , or elcroach-
~en t of our pro9erties b y th e City of ~n £lewoo d .
7e have in the p~st had true ,nd ac cur~te surveys ma d e of our pro p erties by
qu3.lified enc inef;.'rs and h:l.Ve .o aid t.J.x e s on t i1 h. a mount of property.
As t a xp~yers and p ro p erty ovm ers we would like t h is mttter to be corrected •
---------------~----------~-______ , ________________ _
---------------_:::=~-~-.::~: --~-~--1./_-~:;o_!A:; __ k_z_;_,_z_~z~~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------------------~---~~-~~ ~-~9-•:~~-~~.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------~-------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
•
I • •
•' \ !
' ' '!'
1-
·-
•
TO:
•
• •
INTER-OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
FROM: Stephen A. Lyon, Director of Finance
SUBJECT: Highway Safety Project Grant for Police Department
July 1, 1971
The Englewood Pollee Department has obtained a highway safety
project grant for its alcohol safety program in the amount of $4, 920. 00.
This grant covers the purchase of a vehicle with radio and emergency equip-
ment.
Because the vehicle will remain the property of the City of
Englewood, a resolution is attached appropriating the grant to the Police
Department. Personnel costs have already been appropriated and the
officer is currently on duty with the department. In affect, the City is
being given credit for these costs .
SAL: dfl
Attachment
,_
. .
• . .
I • •
.. f
-
'.
•
•
•
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. _, SERIES OF 1971
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS TO THE ENGLEWOOD POLICE
DEPARTMENT FOR AN ALCOHOL MOBILE UNIT.
WHEREAS, The Englewood Police Department has received a federal
grant approval under the Highway Traffic Safety Administration for $4, 920. 00
to purchase an alcohol mobile unit,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section I. The following financial transaction is hereby authorized :
Increase in Revenue Estimate
General Fund, Miscellaneous Income $ 4, 920 .00
ApPropriation of Funds
Police Department, Capital Outlay $ 4, 920.00
Section 2. The City Manager and Director of Finance are hereby
authorized and directed to make the above changes to the 1971 appropriations
of the City of Englewood, Colorado.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this ____ day of --------• 1971.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Ex Officio City Clerk
I, Stephen A. Lyon, ex officio City Clerk of the City of Englewood,
Sate of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Is a true,
accurate, a nd complete copy of Resolution No. __ , Series of 1971.
Ex Officio City Clerk
,_ ..
I
I • •
.• I ! '
-
•
•
•
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. ___ , SERIES OF 1971
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS TO THE ENGLEWOOD POLICE
DEPARTMENT FOR AN ALCOHOL MOBILE UNIT.
WHEREAS, The Englewood Police Department has received a federal
grant approval under the Highway Traffic Safety Administration for $4, 920. 00
to purchase an alcohol mobile unit,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section I. The following financial transaction is hereby authorized:
Increase in Revenue Estimate
General Fund, Miscellaneous Income $ 4, 920.00
Appropriation of Funds
Police Department, Capital Outlay $ 4, 920.00
Section 2. The City Manager and Director of Finance are hereby
authorized and directed to make the above changes to the 1971 appropriations
of the City of Englewood, Colorado.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this ____ day of --------• 1971 .
Mayor
ATTEST:
Ex Officio City Clerk
I, Stephen A. Lyon, ex officio City Clerk of the City of Englewood,
Sate of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Is a true,
accurate, and complete copy of Resolution No. __ , Series of 1971 •
Ex Officio City Clerk
;-
•.
I • •
·. •' I !
, I
•
•
TO: All Members of the Englewood City Council
FROM: Mr. Stanley H. Dial, City Manager
DATE: June 28, 1971
SUBJECT: POSSIBILITY OF CONTRACTING FOR CUSTODIAL SERVICES
AT THE CITY HALL AND LIBRARY, POLICE BUILDING,
AND PARKS AND RECREATION BUILDINGS
Mr. Stephen A. Lyon, Director of Finance, has researched the possibility
of contracting the custodial service at the above buildings in keeping with
your request made during a budget hearing late last year. The figures re-
cited are probable costs if contract services were obtained from several
private firms, but are not contract quotations.
Based on his research, and my own observations, I would recommend that
we maintain our present "in house" custodial service at all of the buildings
mentioned.
City Hall and Library Building:
If we were to contract for custodial service at the City Hall and Library,
It would probably cost a minimum of $25, 900 and a maximum of $34, 300,
depending upon the firm employed and whether one or one and one-half
man years would be required for "special services." "Special services"
would Include such Items as securing the building after 10:00 p.m. (thls
service Is not economical to contract for after 10:00 p.m.), odd jobs,
including special clean-ups and room set-ups for meetings.
Our present costs for custodial service are $30, 200, not counting over-
time which is budgeted at $2, 000. Assuming we only needed to retain
one full time employee for "special services," the least we could contract
our custodial services for would be $25, 900, or a possible savings of
$4,300. The maximum would probably be $30,900, or a possible savings
of only $700.
In view of the questionable economies Involved, and the very real possl-
blllty of not maintaining the quality of work our present staff renders, I
recommend that we not contract custodial service at the City Hall and
Library.
Pollee Bullding:
Present custodial service for the Police Building costs approximately
$7, 500 per year. It might be possible to contract for this service for
$3,700, or a savings of $3,800. As with the City Hall and Library, we
would again have to make provision for special services. In addition to
(Continued)
,. .
I
•
•
•
0 -
All Members of the Englewood City Council
June 28, 1971
Page 2
the "special services" listed above, our present custodian performs
numerous other odd jobs which would not be considered a part of any con-
tract service. For example, he regularly cleans and disinfects the in-
terior of all pollee vehicles. This, of course, is in addition to the regu-
lar wash jobs received at the Servicenter.
Perhaps the most telling argument against contracting for service in the
Police Building Is that we will soon be moving into our new Police-Fire-
Center, and at this point, I would definitely recommend against cleaning
this building on contract.
Parks and Recreation Buildings:
Present custodial service for the Denny Mlller Building aDd the Duncan
Building costs approximately $6,600 per year. These services include
special repairs to the buildings, but more importantly control over access
to the inventory at the Denny Miller Building. This inventory ranges
from $6,000 to $10,000, depending on the time of the year. Cost of con-
tracting for custodial service alone ranges from $2, 200 to $3, 300. Be-
cause of the control requirement over thla large inventory, it is recom-
meDded that we again not contract for custodial services.
Respectfully,
SHD /ij
Att •
•
"'.
I
'