The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1971-10-04 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet• 0 - • -Cou.nc::i..1 Meet:Lng --OC't..c::>ber Jf-, 1 9 71.. • • r I • • • CX>OHC::I:L CHAIGliUtS CXTY OP ~D, C:OLO.BA.DO OC"'"'B&R 4r ~971 The City Cou.nc.i..1 o::f the C:i.ty or En.g'1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado, -.et i..n. ::regu1a..r -••ion on Orct.obe.r 4, 1971, at 8:00 P.M • ..._yor Sc~a.b, p.rea:Ld.i..nq, ca~1ed. the Dleeti..nq to order. The i...n~ocati..on was qiven by the Reverend ~1en Strong of the United Presbyte.ri..a.n Church. P1ed.qe of A..l.l..eqi..a.nc:e wa.a 1ed by Mayor Schwab. T.b.e Mayor .... ked Lor ro11 ca.11. Upon the ca.11 of the ro11, the fo11owLnq were preaent: Counci1.men Senti., Lentsch, Lay, Krei.l.i..nq, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Absent: None The Mayor d.ec:J..a..red a. quorum. present. A.1so present were: City M&na.qe:r Dial.. Aaaist.a..nt City Ma.na.qe.r Mc:.Oivitt City Attorney Berardini Deputy City C1erk Herndon COUHCILIIAN DHORITY MOVED , COONCXLMAN XAY SECONDED, THAT THE MINUrES, AS CO.JlltECTBD, or Tim REGOLA.R MEETING OF SBPTEHBER 20, 197.1., AND THE M.XNt:rrES OP THE SPEC'XA.L MI!:::B'TING OF SE..PTE.IIBER 27, 1..971, BE APPROVED. Upon the ca.11 of the ro:l.1, the vote reau1ted. •• ::fol..l..owa: .Ayea: Cou.nci11Den Senti., Lentsch, Lay, Krei1:Lnq, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Absent : None The Mayor dec1ared the -=»ti..o:n carried. Mayor Schwab recognized M.r. George W. Gorham and George w ... Gorham, Jr., 1770 Weat Ba1ti..c Avenue, Precinct No. 1; Mr. Emmett H. Chase, 2805 South Sherman Street, Precinct No. 3; and Mr. and Mrs. Bi.11 Dawso.n, 4881 South Xnca. Street, Precinct No. 15 from the 1i.at of Spec:La1 Citizen Program xnvitees. Mr. Gorham appeared before Counci~ and suggested that the City enforce the speed l..i.m.:i.t siqns i.n hi.& area.. Hr. Haro1d .Ru.at, .Ma.na.qer of the Enq1ewood office of the Publ..ic Service Company, appeared berore City Cou:nci1 to present the Pub1ic Service Company r.ranch.i.ae tax chec.k for the th:i..rd quarter or 1971 i...n the amount of $37,000 ($12,500 ror gas and $24,500 for e1ectricity). Mia• 8ybi1 Pabricant, 1420 &aat Bate• Avenue, appeared be::fore Counci1 to requeat a chang'• i.n the Muni.cipa1 C:OCS. to permit a c~at operati..o.n • • 0 • - - - - 2 - MLas Fabricant d.i...acuaaed t..b.e ~sting syate ... with Cou.n.c::i.~. She stated t.ba.t -.any pr~ent peop.1.e have u..ed. the c:a-po.-tinq .et..hod of ferti.- l.i..z:i..ng and have ~ound. it better t.b.a.n ~ci...a..1 fe.rti.l..i..z:er. She al.ao stated that Counc::i..1.-.a.n Brown b..ad. been to her bouse to see b.e.r C:oalpoOat pi..l.e. Counc:~ B:ro-n stated that be bad been to Mi..-aa Pabri.c:a.nt • a: bouse and had found the odor r.~ b.e..r cc::.t.poat pi....1.e o.:f.f.e.n.a..i.ve.. It wa.& &1.ao stated that Council. had i.nat.ruc::-t.ed the City Attorney to review the Muni.ci.pal. Code regardi...ng c:ompoati..ng. Discussion ensued. The mi..nu.tes of the ~ Board of Di-rectors zaeeti..ng of SepteJDber 15, 1.971., were received for the record. The ID.i..nut.e.s of the Work.a.l::tl.e Program Citizens Committee meeti...ng of September 9~ 1.971., were received for the record. The JD.i..nutes of the Pl.a.nni...ng and Zoni...nq Co~n~Di.ssi.on m.eeti.nq of September a, 1971, were received for the record. Excerpts r:ro-. the unapproved m:Lnutes of the Pl.a.nni...ng a..n.d Zoni...ng Commission meeti...nq of September 21., 1.971., toqether with four memoranda re1aying the ~o11owLng recommendat~ona, were received for the record. (1) Rec~n.dation that the a11ey in the 1600 and 1700 b1oclc.s between West Ba.1tic a.n.d West Warren Avenues be vacated. (2) Reco-anda.t:Lon that the ut:i....l.ity eaae.me:nt in the 4100 b1ock o~ South Huron Court be vacated. (3) Reco~ti.on to adopt a p1anned deve1opment district ordi.n.an.ce. (4) Recomaendation to adopt fourteen separate amendments to the C~rehen ai ve Ordinance. COUNCXLMAN 1AY MCJVED, COONC.x:x.IIA.N SBNr:X SECONDED, T~ COta.:=I.L A.CC'EPT THE MZCa..tBNDA.TIOHS OP THE P:I.A.HNZNG AND ZC'ei.ZNG CO ... I.SS.XON AS CCliMTAINI!D IN THE UNA.PP.RIO'V'B.D M-XNOTBS OF SB~R 21, 1.971, StJBJECT TO APP~ BY THE PLA.NNXNG AND ZON.X'NG CXlMKXSS.XON AT THEIR NI!DCT RBGtn:A.R MEET.XNG.. Upon the ca1l. of the ro11, the vote reau.1ted aa ~o11owa: Ayes: Counc.i.:1..Jae.n Senti., Lentach, Lay, Krei.1i.ng, Dhori.ty, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried. The •J..nu.tee or the Water and. Sewer Board -•ti.nq or Sep~ 21, 1.971, were recei.ved. ror the record. A .-orandua date<l Sept~r 21, 1971., rec~di.n9 approva1. or the Connector •• A9re.-.nt ror a--..ve t.reat::..nt aerv.S..ce wi.th Cher:ry Hi1.1.e Jtancho Water and &a.ni.t.at.i.on Di.atri.ct i.n the v:l..c:l.ni.ty oJ! :Baat Oxr"ord Av.nue and South C.1arkaon Str-t, wa• rec•i.ved and d.i.acua-.d. • -- r [ • • • • -3 - COUNCXLMAN XAY MOVED, COUHCLI..HA.N SEN'rX SECONDED, T!IJI..T THE CONNECTOR'S AG.REE.MENT FOR SEWAGE TREATMENT SE..R.VXCZ wrrH CHE.R.Rlf' HI..LLS RA,NCJ«) WATER AND SANX'l":AT:I.CJN D:X.ST..R.ICT BE A.PPROVED AND T~ THE MAYOR AND C.XTY CLERX DB AU'rHO- RIZED TO SXGN SAXD AGREEMEWX'. Upon the ca.11 of the ro11 , the vote reaul.ted as ~o11owa: Ayes: Counc:i.1~nen Senti., Le.ntach,. Lay, Krei.1i.n.q, Dhor i.ty, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None Absent : None The Mayor dec1ared the moti.on carried . A memorandum recommending the adopt~on of a resol.uti.on decl.ari.ng ce rta~ w ater mains inadequate and authorizing the co11ecti.on of charges for new Lnsta11ati.ons w as r eceived for the record. RESOLtrriON NO. 38, SERIES OF 1971 A RESOLUT:X:ON At.rrHORI.ZING REPXACEMENr OF INADEQUATE WATER LXNES. (Copied i...n ful.l. i...n the off1.c1.a.1. Resol.ut i.on Book.) COUNC.XLMAN LENTSCH MOVED, COUNCXLMAN .I.AY SECONDED, THAT RESOLUTION NO. 38, S .ER.XES OF' 1971, BE A.DOPTE.D AND APPROVED. Upon th.e c:a.11 of the rol.l., the vote reau1ted as fo11ows: Ayes : Cou.nci.1.men Senti., Lentsch, Lay, Krei.l.i.ng, Dhori.ty, Brown, Sc~ab - Nays: None Absent : None The Mayor dec1.a.red t.he 11110ti...on carri.ed. A meJDDrandum. recomme.nd.i.nq a proposed Suppl.ellleZlt No. 3 to the Con.nec:to:r•s Ag':re--.e.nt wi.t..h Sheri.d.a..n Sani.t.ati.on D i.atri.c:t i.n t .he vi.c:i.n i.ty of South Federal. Boul.evard and West Kenyon Avenue waa recei.ved and di.acusaed. COUNCI~ XAY MOVED, CotJNCXLMAN BRC>WN SECONDED, T~ SUPPLEMENT NO . 3 TO THE Ceti'NECTOR"S AGREEMENT WITH SHERIDAN SANrrATXON DISTRICT XN THE VXCXNITY OiF SOurH FEDERAL BC>OLE'VARD AND WEST KENYON AVENUE BE APPROVED AND THAT THE MAYOR AND C:rrY CIB.RK BE At7ra::>RIZBD TO S1GN SA.XD SUPPLI!!.MENT. Upon the c&11 of the ro11, the vote resu1ted •• £o1l.owa: Aye a: Counci.1.men Senti., Len tach, Lay, K:cei.1i.ng , Dhori.ty, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the mot i.on car:ri.ed • Introduced as a Bi.l.l. by Counc:i.Lman Krei.1ing and read i.n fu1l., A BXLL FOR AN OltDXNANCB AMBNDXNG TXTLB ZX (LXC.NSB& ~ ......XT8) CP TIIB '69 S.M. C. , .BY AD0%1C; A ._. CHIU'T'&A THB..-r<> ~ SNT %TI.&D CHAPrKR 8, •pa.LXca: A11:D PX.IIB ~ BY~• 1 aa"l"AIILXBHXMG ST~ AIID CONTJk)L&: POR .OL%C8 AJK) r1- A.LA.all D8V.%.c:aa, ..OJD:IIXTXHG TIIB Ca...cT:I.C'el or 8AXD ~xca& TO ..:aL.XC ~ TSx.&Pac.K Ta:J'Hk L%liiB&, AND ~x::a.xNG THB L:J:CinlS:rNG TIIKRKPOR. • • 0 ,. • • • • - 4 - C':>UNC:I:.LMJ\N K.REIL:rNG MOVED,. COt:JNCI.LMAN IAY SECONDED, THAT THE B::I:LL F O R A N ORD1NA.NCE BE PASSED ON P:LRST READING AN.D POBL:LSHED .XN' P'OLL XN THE ENGLEWOOD HERAJ..D SENTINEL. t.lpc>n the ca11 of the ro11,. the "Vote resu.l..t.ed as fol.1ows: A yes: Cour.ci1men S ent1,. L entsch, Lay , Kreil~g , Dhor1 ty, Brown,. S c hwab. N ays: None Absent: Nc':'l e The Mayor de.c1a.red t.he lnOt:i.a.•, carried . COUl'.CILMA::.: LAY MDV'ED,. COUNCILMAN DHOR.:rTY SECONDED , TFO\.T THE ORDI.- NA!"CE ON Fx.N~_L RF.A!>ING A.."'!ENDING SECT.X.O 2,.. CHAPTER 5 , ENTITLED,.. ""SOL1.0 WAST E S -L..I'II"ER. AND HANDBL.LLS .. , T:rTLE VI , •59 E.M.C. BY PRC>HIB ITING ALL PR.IV;.TE RECE..PT.ACLES PROM BEING PLA.CED IN PUBLIC THOROUGHFA..BES, EE TABLED ~ Dpon the c~1 o~ the ro11,. the vo~e re&u1ted as £o11ows: Ayes: Counci~en sent1 ,. Lentsch , Lay ~ Krei1 ~g , Dhoricy ,. Bro wn , Schwab. Nays: None .Absent: None The Mayor dec~ared the motion carried. Introduced as a Bi11 by Cou..nci.1ma..n Lentsch and read i..n fu1.1.,. A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING A UTILITY EASEMENT LY:rNG AND BEI'NG HrrHIN THE SNOINBARGER SUBDrvXSION, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORAJX). COUNCIJ:AIIIAN LENTSCH MOVED,. COUNCI.LMAN BROWN SECONDED, THA.T THE BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUB LISHED IN FULL IN THE ENGLEWOOD HE.RA.LO SENTINEL. Opon the c.a.11 of the ro.l.1, the vote resu1ted as fo110'W&: Ayes: Cou.nci.1.Dl.en S enti., Lentsch , Lay, Krei1i.ng, Dhor i.ty,. Bro-n, Schw-ab. Nays: None Absent : None The Mayor dec1a.red the mot:i..on carried . Introduced as a Bi.1.1 by CounciLman Dhority and read ~ fu.11~ A B:J:.LL FOR i-o.S 01?0 ~~-~ 1-JACAT~~ T li:\T CERTA IN ALLEY LCX'.:ATBD :I::J<o; B LOC'"X 79 ,. SI:!ERLDAN BEZ:GRrS, A.RAPAHOE COUb."rY, CXJLO.RADO. COUNCI.XMAN Dl«>R.ITY MOVED , COtlNCIXMAN LENTSCH SBCOliiD.BD ,. T .t::aT THE BILL POR AN ORDXNANCB BE PASSED ON FI.RST RB.ADXNG AND P{E;LZSHBD :IN PULL XN THB BNGLBWOOD BE.RAI.D SBNT:rNBL. Open the c.a.1.1 or the ro.l.1, the vote re•u1t-.d •• ro110W'S : • \ I '! • • r - - - - -5 - A yes: Counc~~men Senti , Lentsch, Lay, Kre iling , Dhor i ty, Brown, Sch'-la.b . Nays: None A.b sen None The Mayor decla red che mocion carried . Counc11 "s informa~ decision of S eptember 27 , 1971 , to provide City pick-up of tree 1 imbs broken durLng the recent sno~storm was discussed. COUNCILMAN LENTSC H MOVED, COUNC l:LMAN Of-K)R..ITY SECONDED, THA.T THE CITY PROCEED TO PICK UP T R.E..E BRANCHES THA.T WERE DESTROYED IN THE LA.ST SNOW STO RM . Upon the ca11 o£ the ro11 , the vote resulted as fo11ows: A yes: Councilmen Sent i , Lentsch, Lay , Kre11Log, Dhor ity , Brown, Nays : None Absent: None The Mayor declared the motion carried . City Manager D ia1 stated that the general publ ic could haul tree limbs to the P eter Kie-it 1ot located north of Union Street and -est of Platte Ri.ver Dr ive . Mr. Dia1 stated that the property o -ners -i11 be required to place tree leaves 1n the p1astic bags rather than p1 acing the leaves Ln the gutter C ity Manager Dial reported that the Workable P rogram Comm~ttee would 1 i ke to meet with City Counc i l possLb1y on October 14, 1971 . City Manager D ~a1 stated that October 11th and 25th shou1d be set aside as study sessions for members o£ Council . COUNC:XLMAN I.AY MOVED , COUNCI LMAN SENTZ SECONDED , THAT CITY MANAG ER DIAL B E A UTHORIZED TO A TTEND THE :n.n'E RNA.TXONAL CITY MANAG ERS ASSOCIATION MEET ING IN HOLL¥WOOD , FLOR.IDA., FROM NOVEMBER 7 , 1 971, THRDOGH NOVEMBER 10 , 1971 . Upon the ca11 o f the ro11, the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: A yes: Councilmen Sent i , Lentsch , Lay , Kre i1ing , D hority , Brown, S chwab . Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor declared the motion carried . M r . Edward Connors, Cherry Hi11s Vi11age, appeared before Counci1 regarding composti.ng . M r . Connors stated that the ordi...nance rega.rdi.nq composti.ng w as unenforceable and shou1d be changed . D iscussion ensued . • -- 1'32X [ • • -6 - COUNCILMAN LAY MOVE•D, COUNCILMAN SENTI SECONDED, THkT THE MB.ETXNG BE ADJOURNED. Upon the ca~1 of the ro11., th.e vote resulted as :fo1.1owa: Ayes: Council..me.n. Senti, Lentsch, La.y, K.rei1i..ng, Dhori.ty, Brown, Nays: None Absent : None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried, and the meeting adjourned at 9:55 P -M. Ex Offic~ C1.erk of the Counci1 • • • I' - - - RESOLUTION NO. 38 SERIES OF 1971 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REPLACEMENT OF INADEQUATE WATER LINES. WHEREAS. Section 15 -3 -56(b) of the '69 E.M.C. pro- vides that the City Counci1 may construct a ~ater main of sufficient size to serve an area that is current1y served by an inadequate 1ine~ when, in the opinion of the City Counci1~ the present 1ine is causing an undue hardship upon the users thereof or upon the City; and WHEREAS, the City Counci1 does hereby find and determine that the 1ines as existing on January 1~ 1971 in the pub1ic streets 1isted be1ow were and are in - adequate and do cause undue hardship thereby upon the users thereof, as we11 as upon the City. NOW • THEREFORE • BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO as fo11o-s: 1. That a11 service connections to the o1d 1ines in the fo11o~ng 1ocations~ that have not a1ready been changed over to adequate City ma1ns sbou1d be changed over as soon as practicab1e and at the cost of the property O"WTt.er . 2. That a11 changeovers accomp1ished in the 1oca- tions set out be1o~ be ~ade in accordance with the schedu1es estab1ished by the City Counci1 in its Reso1ution dated June 16. 1956 and that the same be co11ected by the Department o£ Uti1ities of the City. (a) 900.1000 and 1100 B1oc~ on East Amherst Avenue 2700 B1ock on South Emerson Street 2700 B1ock on South Ogden Street 3100 B1ock on South De1a~are Street 3200 B1ock on South H~bo1dt Street 3900 B1ock on South Logan Street 4500 B1ock on South Acoma Street ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 4th day of October, A.D., 1971. -1- • -- 1'32X [ - - - - I, Stephen A. Lyon, ex off~cio City C1erk of the City of Eng1e~o od, Co1orado, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and comp1ete copy of a reso1ution adopted by the City Counci1 of the City of Eng1e~ood at its regu1ar meeting on the 4th day of October. A.D .• 1971. ~ ~ ~~ -2 - • -- r 32x lr • • • I. Stephen A. Lyon. ex officio City C1erk of the City of Eng1e~ood. Co1orado. do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true. accurate and comp1ete copy of a reso1ution adopted by the City Counci1 of the City of Eng1ewood at its regu1ar meeting on the 4th day of October. A.D .• 1971. ~ ~~~ -2 - • • '32x • • • • O FFICI A coy r•L ,..... INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING THAT CERTAIN ALLEY LOCATED IN BLOCK 79, SHERIDAN HEIGHTS, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO. WHEREAS~ there present1y ex~sts an a11ey 1ocated Ln B1ock 79. SHERIDAN HEIGHTS. Eng1e~ood. Co1orado; and WHEREAS» the a11ey requested to b e vacated 1ies entire1y ~ithin the City of Eng1ewood and has no common boundary with any other po1itica1 subdi~sion; and WHEREAS. if vacated. no 1and wou1d be 1eft without access to a dedicated pub1ic way; and WHEREAS. no uti1ities are now 1ocated in said a11ey which wou1d require a right-of-way; and WHEREAS. the P1anning and Zoning Commission of the City of Eng1ewood has heretofore recommended that the a11ey- wa.y be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as fo~~o-s: Section 1. That the fo11owing described a11ey. 1ocated ~thin the City of Eng1ewood. Arapahoe County. Co1orado. be and the saxne is hereby va..c.ated, to-wi.t: The a~~ey in B~ock 79, SHERIDAN HEIGHTS, Arapahoe County, Co1orado, between South Raritan and South Pecos Streets, bounded on the north by the Eng1ewood City LLmits and on the south by West Ba1tic P1ace. Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the 4r-/, day of October, 1971 . of Pu.b1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the ?-~ u;-;,..~.,.,... ~971. day I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and comp1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the ~~day of October, 1971 . ~- - MENT • 0 r 32x - - - • - INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING A UTILITY EASEMENT LYING AND BEING WITHIN THE SNOWBARGER SUBDIVISION. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. WHEREAS, there present1y exists a Uti1ity Easement 1ying and being within the Snowbarger Subdivision of the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado; and WHEREAS, said Uti1it:y Easement no 1onger serves any usefu1 purpose; and WHEREAS, the P1anning and Zoning Commission of the City of Eng1ewood has heretofore recommended that said Uti1ity Easement be vacated. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as fo11ows: 1. That the fo11owing described Uti1ity Easement 1ocated within the City of Eng1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado be and the same is hereby vacated, to-wit: (a) Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 3, SNOWBARGER SUBDIVISION. 1yLng Ln the SE-1/4 SE-1/4 of Section 4, TSS, R68W; thence east a1ong the south 1ine of said Lot 3, 8.0 feet to the true poLnt of beg~nning; thence north and para11e1 to the west 1~ne of sa~d Lot 3, 8.0 feet; thence east and para11e1 to the south 1ine of Lot 3, 182.0 feet; thence south and para11e1 to the east 1~ne of Lot 3, 8.0 feet to a point on the south 1~ne of Lot 3; thence west a1ong the south 1ine of Lot 3, 182.0 feet to the true po~nt of beginning. This vac at ion does not inc1ude the water 1ine easement as recorded in Book 924, Pages 207 -209 & 211 of Arapahoe County records. Introduced, read ~n fu11 and passed on first read~ng on the 4~ day of October, 1971. Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the of October, 1971. Attest: _.?...__-r7("'_:..__~day ~~~ ex i,4fl0ctty C1~ -1- • -- I' 32X - - - I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and comp1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of October, 1971. -2- • i -- T 32X [ / • • • • J~ =' # /~ /~ '~.z( -_-,_-" ~ C2-7 ~«~ :f?d ~ CV?~rr:-~"'~ ~~ .-.:?~~ -< , • 4 --<4..:_._ ..,.,, ..£?~~~ ~ / .P .,..__...._ cz./ ~~..,.,.. --?du-z~~--=--·e4"'7 -C-?~4.--/ ~ ./..a=.zL:?' .-&-~~-?i ~ ~ ... ~~,...._ h'.a-<7 ~ ---4 .a< ~~-~.&:--- ~/>;~ "?' .c4 ~---~ ~~~ Z <:>c.,..__. c:¥"~ ~ -;Y CleA~·~.,_ ~'.9-d ~ AK'.avflY ~~- ~ /-:1;<~-n' ~/~ ---~-~ ~ 7~ ..-<::'-....aL?/£1"'--Z'~ ~~ ~ ~~"'--? ~~ ~ ~ ~d; Ar.ay/~ C3L'~----~ c7 ~~>-:?./~ ~~ a:h.o ~~--d-./ .c~~~ .&~~<.-<- ~~ ~ .c;.l~ ~~~ ~~~-~..._._._. ~ ~~~~ z4 ~~~3}7~~ /-:?:;'~_y cr ~"~-"/9.?/ ~ ~ ~ 41' ~ ....-d_,.P e..:~ -?~~ -? ~ ..z.?_ /5'7/ ~ ~4«~ z~..._ =C ~ ;;r ~4 ...-?,.,JC>~ ~ ~~ ~-:::z--~ CL-<'-~c'~L ~ c:zye--~ .b74-<:;t'~ ~~ -~ ~-~~.7'"" 4:/ ~~ c-~ ~5-"' 4:./~...--?'""> 1"7 70 k/ ..8~ ~-~- a._~ 4-~-7-.F-o.s -~ ~~ ~ ~- --A-1..<"'-<' ~ ~ ~F,r /_...e, ~ ~~ __.t:_...:/-'7' .;r ~~-~/~ oz.&L?"'""'--..::h.l-.-2~-a~ /7-:!? ~ ~~z::.d.:-r z:4 ~ ~ -6<:" ~p?_/~/~~~ ~ ~ ;:::::?:74 -~~&>""" ~~ ~---=~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~""" %7 __.r-.A::-~~ ~:.---c;] ~ ~-< ~~ "<./ _ _....c ~ r-;C ~~ ~-cz,. ~ ___z;;;-_,c..-/~~ ~ d' ~ ~ /_.F.?_,< • 0 • • • • ~ ~ ~"~ff':d ~ ~~ CV?~--/r" ~~ ~~ .-?..-~ ~ ~ ...-cr, .. < .. ~:_-~, P-.::.::Z"&..,_, ~ / .P ,...._...,_ =/ ·o<!:> ..-u_-. ~~~ _../~~ ~--,;;_/. '7' _ /c:a~4c/ ~ /~v'?C;;>- _A.o~~-. / ~ _..,.,~~-/~~~-~-<.. 4 a< ./8~-~&..-- ~~~ <7" £4 ,2-.-~ ~~ Za~..:¥~ ~~-~ -;;r aeA?--~·-~·-__., ~ ~~..to/~~~_ ~ /-:rza-yJ? ~/~ --4'~-~ ~ ~ ......c.LU?/ r _z.&:. ~..-c~ ~ ~~ ... ~ LZ.-c-<!L ~~ ~ ..-;::z-~ &--.ay.--..;o c::d~---~ c7 ~~>-:?/~ ~~ czk, ~~--.d~ cu--~~ .&~~<-" ~~ ~ .c::/~ ~~~-~~__,_.___ ~ 6:.-<>c:.-~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~ -7 ...7~ _.......,~~ /-:?:tLL2'C;? -:r-~ .ZLJ----/97/ ~ d ~ -7 ~ ~~-:J~_/~ ?' ~ ~.?-/77/ --4-~--<2--~ z~_.__ -czC ~·-$"'" ~-4 ~.,~~ ~ -z-~~ ~--::z-~ ~~-~e"~L,_ ~.,__ ~ P.~-:' ~h~ .--tP...-.~ .n---~~7~ Lv ~~ ~~_--;:;-/. "(/-.. , c-~ ~:;-c u/~...--:::;r>-<'7 70 u./ ,6'~ 4?~_,-4-f:-::>. ~ .. ~ .,.<;/ ~' 7 -.F-.r-•.s ~ ~---~------~ __,...-4. --.A-~ ~ ~ ~hF-/~ ~ ~~ __.t:.~ ?' "/" ~~ a:.7~-OZ-.P..J?'>~"'-~~"'.-e-a..__ /7-:!P ~ ~~ z/c--/ z4 _.-;~ ~ ~ ~dL~/....GL.~ __.:_.____ ~ ~ :;::;?::'4 -~~~ _AP~ ~--=---=~ ::7 ~ ~~~~ ~., .... <f{T .-z-~ __c;:;;;z__/~ ~~ a ~ ~ ...... ~~<..../-~ ~~ ~ ..h2~ ~-4--~ ~ __..c-/'~ ~ z:4 J ~~_-::?.?./ (Continued) • I' • 1· • • • • ~ ••••••• -•••••••••••••• --... ·"""=' ::::?'?-£"~ ----4/~ ~~-4~ /9-?.<P 6 ~..... L2~ ~~?z.:::.:/ --<"'~~ -C!'~~~~./'~~._.,_a.Z..-;r C2 ~~"'<: ~ -rL ;;:?:Y>~,~yo~ .::::::..~ ~ ~~~..r-C2 -~ LC';?C-' ~---' . ';?.?"£££, -9-<Zh;c-_~7 ~~~~ ~ ~ -~~~ ~U.--4..-> $17'<?...--?"~~_,.L~~ .-Z"'L.../ --:?::Y-> ---,P-~~_./--~----""" ~_:;.,.cb /~__,---'~~ ~ ..-c:;n?:r'~~<;Y ~~~ F~~ ~ ~ ~ ____/~ ~~~ ~~--::>?2-C-::J -eL-a/ ~2-7~~-~ c::2./-e.!-!'~ ~~~ ~~ ~-£./--?<2£0'...,-~~ ~~~...-~ Az..c-/~-~c:. __..../ ~ ~ ..... --"'~ ...--d ~C::c3>? ~ ~~~ .::...-~-6<~.., ... ~ LfJ,.,.-z:,--~ -~~~ ~ ~=- ~---~~£-a.=/~---~~ .. ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ :;:J.$ < ~ C= ~.r-7~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~2--?"-_;z,p'-/£~ ~~ ~~ ___.r-L-..../ ..a>' : 6>---~-~ _£~ _,&, ~~--- ~~ q-c2~-?:1~ --<r ....----.-,e~ ~., ~~,.,....,:..-~ c:J;>c-6 ......U9~ -E~ ~ . d~~-~~<ZL----e'<Y ft:,;:,.~~~ _,-d #..4'-6'/-r ~CZ/7..:-/ :9"" ~-'1-L~~ ~ <;P ~/J-,-----7?/ ~~= ...--:! <!.~~~~/ ~ ~~..c~/ fr ~--~· "'.? d U~£~v ~~---~-c;;,.;r~A!.j,. _<f' ~ ;;:;-__..-_>-?/ /.?-=---.!< -----~~---.... ~ .7~ ~ ~.c.;/ fi~.,~~ 4 c-£ ~~ _,..-cY'-'~__?-c:,-J;T~<J'-'""" <f/' ~.f';/?7/ &?c'~ -~C-C~~~'7 ~~ (Con tinu ed) 0 I I I' • • • . . . ... . . .. ~ . ,.. ........... -. -. . . . ......... -.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . .... --........... -...... ~ • c::-~~~ ~z.a-<>~ ~~ ~-'2'--=~ ~~"""~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ 4?~ .z;z:::;. ~ . ~;>P..-<.,_..J? .,... ~So'>_?' ~~ ~~~"""'--~c-../~_,_-::P':. ~ d>-??..Zc:?::::>-2 ~~~ ~~~ ..-?.?:lL,.:!.e<--k :J7 ~ :Z~/9'?::0 -----4-~ ~ :Y ~ ~~~ c-...L.Y ~- ~_.,~-~ -4 7~ .r4---c..-£--~d~ .....---2/~ £'~ -z:-~ _...-?L <J,,e?'?;..-- c-'=--:1 ~.&,.-e"""' cz.R./ cz_;:r .,.._ ~~~ ~ czc~~...Y~ ~ /P:Jcz..y..?'::? ~........,.-~,~~ ~ .P?-<?~· ~~--- ~£47 ~??<2# ~ ~.7./7......,..~ ~-C«~C:Z-,..r ~ ~~ ~--r d ~"""~ ~ ~~~~ c::2--.L.~~--ii5" ~ Q Cb-:r~ <2~~........-.r ~ ~u ~ ~kL~r--.:2.L :1./.2~<.;-~-~~ ~~ 7~~~ &. ,~-4 uAz.E:h -y ~~~~ ~ -:;?~ ~......-c'~/--&r'~~ r.;:::; ~_.;2e.<<<"'~<""" ~~&-....?'-"' c-~ cz...<-<~ Oc..~ ~ .....-~y~ ~e../-~ Z2!.£ ~ ~~ ~--~.._.,-----~ ~PZ~~ ~.c~~----z-L--/-~e~-.??- __.? &_,....,_._ ~~~ _,.r'~ .:r.r-~ ~ :;Pl/97/ ~~~ ~z:d:~~~~ d ~~~£/ 0----o ~~~~"' ~ =-;Y'~~ =--/~ ej if~ ma_y~ d~-u:-.c/ .z::z£, --~ ~J-4~ ~ ~..,-..,~_.u.~ C2 ~s~ --z~ z:-L-~~ .g-a ....-ze ~ ~~~ -~ ~/.??~...-? ~~.cr"~L~ ~ ~ a.£ ~~oi!!.:..?'Z-~· 1fT ..-c:-../..a.-:>_,-.:ee-~ ~ ~~ (Continued) jl • 0 .• 0 I' • • • • a-., ... --4~-,.."""" h?~-< .L~~ ~ ~eX'<-<::>"~~--~ .-z:: ~ ~~~~ a"T'L"'~~~~ ~~~ ~~c:z-d...,._ ~_;__;;T~<>--7 ___..;:_._ d., --?-~~ ~ ~ ~~2~ ~___.., ~ _u,;;..A!/ /~..--... ~ ~ ~~~.?' 7 ~.>< .rtt0 -~""".:P' ~ --2~ ..?""b-z ~ ..--'?L-~~~ =-~o!'.<-J GPP'=-~ r-;t..._ /t!.::•-9:1>2 d «-r::L .... ~ 7~ /~r. ... ~ ~2.~ ~ c7 ~.:£/" ~ ~ ~..-' a-.. a?-"'~,;,. ~,... C2:??2 ~-~ ~ ..zz:-c-~~ ....... ~~4'4!" _/ ¢'~ '/9 ~c-~.:::--~ c:;i'~ ~ ~~~~.e?..-..-~~ ~//2'~ ~~ c~.a--...._ £~ -e-e~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~-----= ~ /~ ...--..------~~.?<CC....-d•y ~ ~----__...:... ~ ___..,......_ ~ ~/-&-~ .?".,6.,~="_,c:;~/'. z~ ~ ~ r z-L ...---7~~ ~ .;?"""~___.,._a~~=--~ ~~~ ~------r-.d q-...L_ .ht=<-1 .t'-1 de~.;.J.e/ L'k /~u >~. ~~.3-~.,./- ~_, .,__/~ ~~ -;7.;:;>7.?7-~~~ ~~~-----~ ~~fo.'~ c~o/"'-- c~d ~ ~~~ ~.:~~~~ ~ ~~· ~~ (Continued) • 0 • • • • C7 ~~ ~ ~· .:e:;;72,c;/. -• __ --.L ~-a4,' cc.:>-~~~ .. "2-=-·~ 0 4<7&::f' e_.,..__,~ ~ .....-~ --<~~-------.z:z: ~...----~~ ~ .......... ~- c~~ .. d< ~~~ ~--:e=..r.=-~ ~ ..... .,__.~~ ~>.<-...-~ ~.~ ~~ ~ .-d'L..,c/ ~ C4e ~~~k.cr --? /.c2-.Rc~Z.<'.c/ P7/ /-::!f/--4£.-.a~ =__p--..?-;7""_.. ......... c4 ~ ~ ~ ~ -2 ~ ~L./~_d-~ ~ ~-«-- c;u./ ~ c;;:/~;-Le> --=-ek:! ~~........ ~C"e:;::;.--k::Y" .77{.. ~J~ ~~ ~~~~~- ~ au>~ -:z_..r~~ -z::/~ ~~__.._... .c7...?6J-_ ~~ _:.._.......,__ ~..,..../ 77_ ~~--/~/ ~ ____,.__,d ~.e"?"&-.=:.&~~~ ~~--? .... ~..c"z'~ ~~~--- ~~ ~ -z;/~=C ......:£~_fi.....,.. ~< ~~ ~__.aa~<~~ ./-..../-~~-~~~R~ ~~~~~~~~4'- C2d/ c:zy c., ~= ~ /?:??ZY~ ~~~~~~~~.,:.r~e-' ~e~/"""''"~-4~L ..--??:7~~ ~ .......... ~...........-....___ ~~.,y-r~~ ~~ce~/, ~ ~ .J.-y" ~~"""" c £-S! z:p"-~e ,.__.. ~~ U"~ c6..~~~_;_,__ d ~~~. ~-----u::: C'~ ""'7 z-4 ....-<:>_~ ~ ~ __..-?e ~--e'z=.__, .a-_~~ CLL/~,?"'e.::P G<-c!'~i> ~ #4-=-;Y..t??' ~~-""'-"""' r£.. ....-?.:>?~ c::--e:2~--- ~ ....?-ar-=.::?~C!'? ~~~~~ ~~ ~~-~----~ ~ ..-2"'~ ~ ~ ~~ (Continued) ..:.. • 0 r • • • • ~ ~.<:~ ~ -/~..ae.~~ _.-?..,..,.,~ f //~~ ~ ~z.c/ a-~/'-·Y a<: ...9/~ ,.e,.~., :;;'7.!<7 ~ ~ ~~~ _..-2"~ ~ _;;;;t?~~~ ~2..£.. ~::--t:::~/ -4--<'d~~ --6 __..c/~..e z.,.C ......;r~ ~ ~ ---d ~~ _/~ ~.a.Z.L J z::/~~ ~ -=~ -z::.4 ~ ~~ ~g..,-~,c;z.....,_.,-4.. a.y-~"""=-p-e<z-~d../ ...-?~_z:;;._....-~ zx: ..z~/~ ~tP:/ -7:7.-:' ~~-d., ~./.>'z-'1:!"~ ~ .2f-~~ -c.v. C7 ~-----~~ ~ -<. c:ZZ.c./_.<ft-:::. ....-p_......--~/-~-~~~~z;:d'-../ c;~....-.---r/ y.?~->7'~~ ~~;:? ~ ~ ~.::? c:2~ ~~ ~~~-.,-~!;;" ~~~:'~<!./e-r ~,~cz._/ ~<'?$.<=~~-~ ..... ~_.-?.;;>'....-~ c::i!.P.<-""~-C2~<'-=c.-.... ~~ -.c:.e...c~,.,..~~~~ ~ ~ ~-=:::29~--v ~ ~/ c-. ~ a;4'_/7-r~t.4.?---~-0eT~.2~/ ,.. a;:P ..... ~~e4: 6l'od?~~-~~ ~ ~~-'2"~ ~~~ ~"'-;?.:?fi'Z/_.?-.....-r.?./ ~L2-'~L"' ~;I;V /.q./.?7../ ~ ~ c?czb"~ ..r-eC ..-::1~~ .aC ~ -~ Cl.-<:-> ~~~~ ~~-~ ~av-Go -= =-~ 0 -z::d,~~-~~~7~~~~ ~7 ~~-.::;?~~ ~"'"~-~ ~<!!""',:::' z;-4~ ~d~~~ ~~~ ............ ..e<..Y".a?"~$9 ~~ ~..:c<-~:?-7-L~ ~~z-.L.....-"'-..r-£ ~-=:/~~"'""' ~~ ~~~~ ~ ..... ~-~~a;.,.__./~~~?~ ~~.£~~-~4-J~ Cb;r.&"-~~--~ ~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~__z6~-4~ o/~G~ ~&?~~,._-?~ z::&:C~_,_.......,~~~ .4'-::_-~~,.,._ ~ a!!V~ -«> -~ (Continued) p • !·• 0 I' ... , - - - - :::% ~"""'? ~=4<>~~.,..-~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~~~-:":" ~"~ ~ 9 .-.s--::r-/--?-- (Continued) • 0 \ ! .. - ' ......... --G ,... ·.J IG ,, l.r • AGENDA FOR REG LAR COUNCIL SESSION OCTOBER 4, 1.971. 8:00 P.M.. Call to order, invocation by the Rev. Allen Strong of the United P'resby·terian Church, pledge of aUeglance led by Pa:ck-174 oi'_ Webolos Den 2,. and roll call. 0 /C. 1... Minutes. (a) Regular meeting o.f September 20, 1971... (Copies trans- mitted herewith .. ) (b) Special meeting of September 27, 1.971.. (Copies trans- mitted herewith.) 2 .. Pre-scheduled citizens and visitors. (a) (b) (c) (d) Recognition of ••special guests•• of the Council .. :t.1.r .. Harold Rust, Y...l.anager of the Englewood office of the Public Service Company, wlll be present to present: the [rancblse check .. Messrs .. St:a.n Searle and Paul M.axweU of the Com.muni- catlon..s magazine wi.u be present to present the Council with the August edt.tlon of the magazine which featured one of Englevvood's police cars with its new' design. Miss SybU Fabricant., 1.420 East Bates Avenue, will be present to request a change ln the M-unicipal Code to permit a compost operation to be conducted in a resi- dential area. 3. Com.munications. II 1 ( (a) Minutes of: the AR.APS Board o:f Directors rn.eettng of September 15, 1971. (Copies tran.srn.itt.ed here-with.) (b) Minutes of the Wo·rkable Program Citizens Com:rnittee of September 9, 1971.. (Copies transrn.itted. herewith.) (c) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of September 8, 1971. (Copies transmitted bere"Wlth.) (d) Excerpts from the unapproved minutes of the Planning -__ .-- a nd Zoning Conuntssion meeting of September 21., 1.971.. _ (e) (Copies transrn.itt.ed herewith.) ~ ~---__.,(_ (1.) Becommend.atlon that the alley ln the 1600 and ~L ' 1700 blocks bet:Yoreen West. Baltic and West . War-ren Avenues be vacated. (Bill for an ~~ Ordinance transmitted bere'With.) ~ (2) Recommendation that the utUlty easement ~L~~L ~':~~:~ooc:tll~~:ra~o~~H~~: ~:':::m~tted ~ I (3) (4) berevrl th. ) Rec.ommend..ation to adopt a planned develo~ ment district ordinance. R ecommend.at:ion to adopt fourteen separate amendments to the Comprehensive Ordinance .. :ei::e':~; :;~ 'i:~~ a~0~~e~::~~~~~~~~th-) ------ (1.) Memorandum recoinmending the approva.i of ..,.,.- the Connector• s Agreement for se'Wage treat-(../"' ment service with Che'iry Hills Rancho 'Water and Sanitation District in 1:he vicinity of East Oxford Avenue and Sout.b Clarkson Street .. (Continued) • • - • • • • AGENDA F OR REGU LAR COU NCIL SESSION OCTOB ER 4 . 1 9 71. P age 2 (e) Minutes of th e Water and Sev;re r Board meeting of S e p tembe r 2 1. .. 1.971.. (Copies transmitted here-with.) (2) M e morandum r e commending the adoption of a r e solution declaring certain vva.ter m a ins i nadequate and authori z ing the _.- c ollection of charges for ne'W' installations. (Resoluti.on transmitted herewith.) (3) ~l e morandurn recommending a proposed ../' Supple r."'!e nt #3 to the Connector 's Agree-...__........- ment w'ith Sheridan Sanitation District in the vicinity o.f South Federal Bou.levard and West Kenyon Avenue .. City Attorney .. Ordinance on £inal reading establishing requirements for police and fire alarm devices connected to the City's primary trunk lines.. (Copies previously trans- mitted .. ) Ordinance on fin al reading regarding the placemen.t of refuse receptacles in alleys .. (Copies p-i-eviou sly transYD.itted.) LA:::..i..--""-- (c) Attorney 's choice. 5. City Manager. (a) Reaffirmation of CouncU•s informal dect_sion of September 27, 1.971., to provide City pick up of tree limbs broken during the recent snowstorm. (b ) Ma.n..a.ger •s choice .. 6.. Recognition o:f non-scheduled citizen s a nd visitor s . 7. General discussion. (a) May or•s c h oice. (b) Councilman's c h oice. 8 . Ad j ournment. STANLEY H. DIAL City Manager SHD/ij • II • • r .32 xI • • - .~ ROLL CALL C'~ "' !i! =4...:1-- ~ 0 ~ i !:! Bra-n D hori.tv K.rei.1 .Ln -La -Lentsch Senti -Schwab • • • • • I' 32 X L --- • - ROLL CALL Brown -- Dhori.t:V -- Krei.1 i.nQ -- La Lentsch Senti. S chwab - • - ~ Zl-', ;f 7/ II • • L,_ '"""' I - - ·.~ ,(' > - / z' ,;z_Cl ROLL CALL Brown Dhori...t Kr e i.~.:Ln. Lav Lentsch Senti Schwab - 0 -,. O FF I C I AL crrv co ~ Cl!._ ~C>CUM ENT !i 'I C:O U :-,.::::;,_ .G F ILE CIT¥ OF ~ Lev;..ooo. COLO.. --- ~~~ l , [ •D ~-:\Jr T 32 X '-' I I_ • -• - - ROLL CALL S! ~ ~ .., ~ i <> "' fjj eo __ ,_ a ~LE CITY O F El'o.JGLc .:coo. COLa.. Brown Dhori.t Kre i.1i.n La Lentsch senti. -Scbwa.b - :2 k-J2...._.y(-~ /<?' -,-v-v 7 ....... <¥ J.~ .. ··-u ~ • • II • • • r 32 ><-[ - • • • ROLL CALL Brown Ohoritv Krei ~:Ln La Lents ch Senti. S chwab • • - CG CJ"I'""J: Of I C:._ L L /?? .... ~~---" 4:-~~ --_, .. ~-z;;;::....._..r ~., ~ ·~ ~~~,__.< ........... '!!: ;:: <:-.,.r~~ /.....<../ r:z::-c ~~---. ~~___._,.,:.---~~---....--~ ... ~~~r£1_- ~ C:&> ~ W ~------_; ~......t,. ~~Z;_....7 -~FJ <-.J. ~ ~-~~ -../-~. a[~-.....a....v-r ;/~ ~ a.u/'7 ~ /~ II • • ' r ;. T 32X - ROLL CALL ~ S! 0 ~ ~ B rown D horit Krei 1 .:Ln. La Len t s ch S enti. S chwab /r /'?- J Z G ., '3 ~ • • 0 - "' "' .., i ::;: ,. O FFICI L c::rrr c;.,cu--· -u r.....-ENT c:ou ._- CITY OF ·, . 1-.L.£ L,.. 000. CO LO~ • • I' 32X I a: 5! 0 l::;! iii ~ 3a._ -!-- ""- d (/ :> <,/ - - - ROLL CALL "' ~ B rown Dho rit Kre i.~i...n La Lentsc h s enti.. S chwab ----- - 0 - c::rn-&. -:!="_'. £""-1 ~ a-<> ---....._~.,._. -:7~~ ~ z:-- ,....,~~~~ \ ! ~ II • - r 32xl • -• ,. - c~~ ~ a_.,_~~ -u:{, /~...<.' ~ e§'rL, ~ r ?~ -c~~ c ..,., ?'7 e -~ ~~--"' ~ -{;? ~-7 _;;.~/s-...-_..--~·c"-:.•«~r-4f ~~ -7~ ~--~~~<>' 3 ,..,_~ ~ a-r ~ ... --<-~-~~ • • • • '. ! '!' II • • I' 32X I[ - • • ROLL CALL B rown Dhori~ Xrei..1 i-n La Lentsch Senti. Sch""'a.b -- • 0 - .. C:O t..;r :._ • ._ ~ F"I L...E C rry OF £ C ._-...,coo. COLO.. £>'"--1 ~ a.-o ..-.........,.~~ -;:?~~ ~ c:- ~c~-:-a.....,~ •• • • r 32xl • - ROLL CALL "" !i! "' ~ 0 ~ til "' ::;: O FF ICI .L CrTY: c:.o u....-., - -· .-ENT B rown ---Dhor j_ty C OU .. ...,~ '-. ~ t oL E K..rei.1 .i..n -C1TY C>F ENGLC'w'\tOOD. COLO- La ---Lentsch __.. ./ Senti.. Schwab ~ .::...c.-.-c ~~ ~ ~ £.~ ~ ~.,.. ... ~ ~~ ~ ~- • • • • • • '32xl - ROLL CALL "' S! ~ 0 !:l B rown D hor i.t K..rei.1 i.n Lav Lentsch S enti... S c h w ab ~ 2 ~ 2 c r-.. ~~ ·), ............ w~ l/J....J z.o Y • • • • 0 - "' ~ <-> ;:;; -- ~ O F CITY c::- co~ CIT':X OF E. GL. £ 2 -o/< • L > • • 1'32X • - 0 - ROLL CALL "' 2 ~ ~ 0>'-c A .;;~lii::EN:II 0 '"' ~ i:i ;:;: ~ B :ro'Wn Dhor j_t -,,L.E Kr...--'_1 i.._n -L •• -o~. c:.oc:ca. Lay CJT., F Lentsch ---Senti ---Schw ab --- zzt- • • • • I' 32X • 0 - ROLL CALL i S! "' "' <> "' § Iii ::c c iTY Brown --l I D h.or.i.t --K.rei.1 .i.n La --Lents ch --Senti. ---Sch-ab ~ L/ a . • • • • ~'32x • • • ROLL CALL -Brown &--~ Dhorit Krei.1 i..n La Lentsch Senti. Schwab ..:.. • 0 - • • 2x I[ ROLL CALL 5! i 0 !:i B r~ Dh.ori...ty K.rei.1i...n La Lents ch S enti. S ch-ab 2 7..>- • • • "' i ,., ~ "" ------ -- • 0 -.. t-\ lit COU C l L £ ,.._.._ '00-0.. C0-\..0 C~ O F-ENGLE \ ! ~ • • - • - ROLL CALL O FFICIAL C:J"TY COU C1 L D OCUMENT "" 2 ~ 0 "' ~ M "' ;:;: co u ~ .... -_ v .-~i LE CITV OF ENGl-E OOD. cc>L--0 - Brown Dho.r.i..ty -Kre.i..1.i..ng -Lav --Lentsch Senti ---Schwab - ~ ..... ,___ t~ at, - -• • T 32xl ROLL CALL i 2 0 !il Brown Dbor .i.ty Krei.l...in La .Lentsch Sent.i. Sc:~ab - - - • 0 - ~ ~ "' ~ ~ ( CIT • 'IL E -COLO. \ ! or -• - - • • • ROLL CALL Brown ---Dhori.t K...rei.l..i..n La Lents ch Senti. sclnoiab I ~ • • - I ' --............. • • • 1'32 X [ • • '-f 0 "1 • -3.1'2.. ROLL CALL Brown Dhori.t Kre:i.1.i....n La Lentsch Senti. S chwab ~ ~~-~ -_eG<>D~c~~- • 0 - ; I co u~~ ~- CITY OF E NGL.. ,;(....00, COLQ • • •• 1'32X [ • • • ROLL CALL Br""""' Dbority X r ei1i.n Lentsch Senti. S chwab ---- • 0 - I ( j • • • - ROLL CALL "" 2 ~ f:l 0 ffl "' ;2 ::;; Br""'"' Dho:ri.t K:rei1i.. Lay Lent:.ac:h Se.nt..i.. Sc ..... ab • • • • - "' i • c o 0 c C1XX OF t.... bL T -t •'-~coo. c oLo. • • I' 32 X I • - - ROLL CALL Brown Dho:ri..t Krei.1i...n Lay Lentsch Senti SChW'a.b - 0 - • O FFICI Cl"'::Z cou-.....c·L COU " ::.,.·• • aLE C:JTY OF 1:-" LL\. '000 COLO \ 'r • • r [ • • • ROLL CALL Brown Ohor i.t Krei..1 i...n Lentsch Senti. S chwab • 0 - • • • [ - • • • • OFF I CIAC COUNC:J:L CIDl,.HBERS c::::1TY' C:OU CI L DOCU~ CITY' OF ENGLEWOOD~ COLORADO SEPTEMBER 20, 1971 ........... ---, l 1 REGULAR. "'WII!:ET:I:NG: The C~ty Counci1 of the C i ty of Eng1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado, met Ln requ1ar session on September 20, 1 9 71, a t 8:00 P.M. Mayor Schwab, presidLng, ca11ed the ~eeti ng to order. The invocation was given by the Reverend Herbert Hosanna of the Mayf1o wer Congregationa1 Church. P1edge of A11eg i ance was 1ed by Mayor Schwab. The Mayor asked for ro11 ca11. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the fo11owLB9 -ere present: Counc i 1men Senti, Lentsch, Lay, Dhor i ty, Brown, Schwab. Abe en t: Counc i.1.man Kre i1 i.ng • The Mayor dec1ared a quorum pres~t- A 1so present were : City Manager Dia1 A ssistant City Manager McDivitt City A ttorney BerardLni D eputy City C1erk Herndon COUNCZLMAN LENrS CH M CJVE D , COUNCILMAN BRC>WN S E CONDED , T HAT T HE MINUTES O F THE .REG UXAR MEET ING OF SEPTEMBER 7, 1971, BE APPROVED. U pon the ca11 of the ro 1 1 , the vote resu1ted as fo11ow s: A yes: Counci.l..men Senti., Lentsch , Lay, Dhori.ty ., Brown , Schw ab. Nays: None Absent: Counci.1.m.a.n K.rei.1i....nq. T h e Mayo r dec1ared the motion carried . Mayor Schwab recoqni..z ed Mr . W i.11i.am H. Luck ing , 8 35 We s t Qu incy Ave nue, Precinct No . 12., from the 1i.s t of Speci.a1 C itiz en Progr am Xn vi.teea. Mrs. Gretchen E ng1ebach of ""Bi.cyc1ea Now•• present e d an imp r o m ptu sketch by members of the ""Bi.cyc1es Now. •• Counci.1man K.rei.1i.ng entered Counci.1 Chambers and took his seat with Counci.1 at 8:30 P.M. Mr. Pau1 w. Thompson , 1005 South Estes Court , L ake wood , a ppeared before City Counci.1 . Mr. Thomp son stated that the automobi.1 e c ons~e s o n e -f ourth of the :nation's enerqy and causes eighty-five per cent of the urban noise . He suggested that Counci1 make a study of commuter bi.cyc1e rou t es i....n the C i t y of E ng1ewood and make provision for sa£e bi.cyc1e parking. Discussion ensued. Mr ... W i.11.i.&m Ha1one, Attorney , repreeen.ti..nq Hr .. and Nr• ... John lloCa.r:re.ry, owner• o~ the Leani.ng Tow.r o~ Pi.a&a, 90 We•t Be.l.1evi.ew, appeared be.ro:re Ci..ty Counci.1 to requeet the i.•euance or a 3.2 .re.r.anted ma1t beve:raq• .l.i..eenee • • • • - - - - - 2 - COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONIE.D, THJII.T THE APPL:J:- CATION FOR A 3. 2 FERMENTED ~T BEVERAGE LICENSE FOR THE LEANING 'X"'OIB.R C1P PZ.ZZA. BE RECEXVEI> AND THAT A DA..TE BE ESTA,BLl:SHED POR A PUBLIC ~ ON NOYEMBB.R 1, 1971, AX 8:00 P.M. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resu1ted aa fo11owa : Sch-ab. Aye s: CounciLmen Senti, Lentsch, Lay, Krei1Lnq, Dhority, Brown, Nays: None Absent : None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carr~ed. Mr. A1an A. Armour, A ttorney, appeared before City Council.. to request the rei..ssua..nce of a 1iquor l..ice.nse for the Be11eview Bo-1, 4900 South Federa.l. BouJ.evard . C01.J'l'<'IC:I:LMAN LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN LENTSCH SECONDED, TJ::DILT THE REQUES T FOR A RE.ISSUANCE OF A L.XQUOR LICENSE FO.R THE BELLEVIEW BOWL, 4900 SOU'rH FEDERAL BOULEVARD, BE APPROVED . Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resul..ted as fo11ow s: A yes: CounciLmen Senti, Lentsch, Lay, Krei1i..ng, Dhori.ty, Bro"Wn, S chw ab . Nays: None Absent : None T h e Mayor decl..ared the motion carried. The minutes of the Board of Career Service Commissioners ~eetinq of September 16, 1971, were received for the record. The minutes of the Board of A djustment and A ppea1a ~eetLng of A uqu at 11 , 1971, w ere rece i ved for the record. The mi..nutes of the Boa.rd of A djustntent and Appea1s nseet i...ng of S eptember 9, 1971, were received for the record. The "'.:Lr1uteo of the Board of A djustment an d .Appea.1 & mee.ti...nq o r S e p tember 15 , 1971 , with a memora ndum attached recommend ing the enc roa chment o f a r etainLnq wa11 on City prop erty at 575 E ast Bates A venue, w ere rec eived for the record. Mr. J~ Weaver, 575 East Bates A venue, appeared before City Counci1 to brief1y state the reason for the requested encroachment. COUNC:r.LMAN DHOR.ITY MOVED, COUNCILMAN SENTI S E CONDED, THA.T THE REQUEST FOR AN ENC:..R.OACHMENr OF A RETAINING WALL ON cr.ry PROPE :RTY A T 575 EAST BATES AVE NUE B E GRANTED. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resu1ted as fo11o~a: A yes: Cou.nci.1.rnen S enti, Lentsch, Lay , Krei1:i..nq . D h.ority , B rown , S c hwab . Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor d ec1ared the motio n carried . • -- - - • • • -3 - The uti....nutes of the P1anni.ng and Zoning Conm~i.asi..on meeting of August 1.7 ~ 1.971., were rece~ved for the record. The minutes of the Pub1 i.c Library Board meeting of September 1.4, 1.971., received for the record. City Counci.1. received a memorandum from Mr. James L . Sup~ger, Pl.a.n.n.i..ng Director, announcing a. date for an i..n.formati.ona1. meeting w ith persons interested in the Santa Fe-Uni.on annexation area e1.ecti.on. ,~~vA~ * ~--:_~c ~1me.n K.rei.l.i..ng , Brown, and Schwab voiced their objections to the de*:e~-of the funds for the proposed gol.f course fro~n the Capital. :X..mprove- ment Program 1971.-1.976. The fLnanci.a.l. report for the month of August, 1.971., w as received for the record . CounciLman Dhority questio~ed the percentage of col.l.ecti.on as compared w ith one year ago Ln the General. Fund. D iscussion ensued . A m.einOr&ndunl fro:m Hr. D ick Morris, Comm.uni.c:a.ti..ons Supervisor, urqi..nq adoption of an ordLnance to requ1a.te pol.i.ce a nd fire al.arm d evices connected to the City•s primary tel.ephone trunk l.Lnes was received for the record. Introduced as a B~l.l. by Counc~l.m.an Kreil.Lng and read in ful.l., A BILL FOR AN ORDX:.NANCE A.MENDXNG TITLE IX (LICENSES AND PERMITS) OF THE "69 E.M.C., BY A DDING A. NEW C~ER THE RETO , ENT ITLED CHAPTER 8, ""POLICE AND FXRE AXA.RM SYSTEMS-; ESTABLX.SHING STANDARDS A.ND CONTROLS FOR .POLXCE AND FXBE AZ.A.RM DEVIC ES, PROHIBITING THE CONNECTION OF SAID DEVICES TO P UBLIC PRIMARY TELEPHCJNE TRUNK LINES, AND REt;;IJ 1R..XNG THE L ICENS ING THEREFOR. COUNCILMAN KREILING MOVED, COUNCILMAN D HORITY SECONDED, THAT THE BILL FOR AN O RDI NANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST REAO IN::i AND PUBLISHED I •N FtJLL IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD SENTINEL . Upon the ca.l.l. of the rol.l., the vote reaul.t.ed as fol.l.ows: Ayes: Counc i.l.men Sent~, Lentsch , Lay, Krei.l.i.ng , Ohority , Brown, Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor decl.ared the motion carried. City A ttorney Bera.rd:i.n.i. reported bri.ef1y to City Coun.c :Ll. rega.rdi.ng l.and acqui.s i.ti.on for P aving District No. 20. Mr. Berardini. atated that or the :rou..r parcel.a of! 1&nd , three h&d been pu.rcha.aed but Ul.at one parcel. wcu.1d. qo to an ~i.ate poaaeaai.on haari..nq. The trial. f!or co.nd.-nat:i.o.n .....:::>ul..cS be h-:rcS poaa1bl.y 1ater thia year or the f!:i.rat or 1972. • • • T 32X - • • • • -4 - RESOLUTION NO. 36, SERIES OF 1971 MENT. RESOLUTION APPROPR.I.ATING FUNDS TO TKE FINANCE AND RECORD DEPART- (Cop~ed Ln fu11 ~the offiCLa1 Resol..ut~on Book.) COUNCILMAN SENTI M OVED , COUNCILMAN DHOR.ITY SECONDED, THA7' RESOLUTION NO. 36 , SERIES OF 1971 , BE A.DOPTED AND APPROVED. Upon the c:a.l.l. o~ the rol.l., the vote resul. ed as fol.l.ows: Schwab. Ayes: Counc:Ll.rnen Senti, Le.ntsch, Lay, K:rei.l..1..ng, Dhor.1. y , Bro-n, N.aya: T yo.c di c:l.a r d RESOLtrr ION NO-3 7 , SER..XES OF l.. 971 A. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR THE PUa:::~ OF ~ FOR THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT. (Cop~ed 1..n ful..l.. Ln the off~cial.. Resol..ution Book.) City Manager D ial.. presented a map to members of Counc1l.. regarding the purchase of a parcel.. of l..and for the Util.ities Department. COUNCILMAN .KREXLING M OVED , COUNCILMAN LA.Y SECONDED, 'TI:lA.T RESOLUTION NO . 37 , SERIES OF 1 97 1 ~ BE ADOPTED AND APPROVED. Upon the ca11 of the ro11~ the vote resulted as fo11ows: Schwab. A yes : Council..men Senti, Lentsch , Lay , Kreil..ing , Dhority, Brown , Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor declared the mot~on carried . City Manager D ia1 d iscussed -ith Council an agr eement -ith Arapahoe County authorizing the County Clerk to co11ect and remit t o t h e City the auto- mobile use tax o-ed to the City . COUNCILMAN DHOR.ITY MOVED , COUNCILMAN LAY S ECONDED~ T l::m,.T AN A G REEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND ARAPAHOE COUNTY B E S IGNED B Y T HE MAYOR A N D CITY CLERK WITH POSSIBLE M INOR WORD C :t.A.RIFICATIONS . Upon the ca11 of the r o 11 , the vote resulted as fo11ows: Schwab . A yes: Councilmen Senti, Lentsch, Lay~ Krei1Lng , D hority , Brown , Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor declared the motion ca r ried . • • • '32x [ - • • • • -5 - Introduced as a B~11 by Counci~man Dhority and read Ln fu11, A BILL FOR AN O.RD:I:NA.NCE AMEND ING SECTION 2, CBA.PTER 5 , ENT ITLED ••SOL.XD WASTES - L:r'rrER AND HANDBILLS", TITLE VI, • 69 E .M.C. BY PROHIBITING ALL PRIVATE RECEPTA- CLES FROM BErNG PI...ACED IN PUBLIC THOROOGHFA.RES . COUNCXLMAN DHOR.ITY MOVED, COUNCILMAN LENTSCH SECONDED, THAT THE BILL FOR AN O BDLNANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHED IN FULL XN THE ENG LEWOOD HE~ SENTINEL. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resu1ted as fo1l..o-s: A yes : Counci..1me.n Senti., Lentsch , Lay, Krei.l..i..ng , Dhority, Bro-n, Schwab . Nays: None Absent : None The Mayor decl..ared the motion carried. C ity Manager Dial.. made a report to City Council.. regarding cabl..e tc1evi.si.on. It w as suggested by Council.. that City A ttorney Berardi.ni. review the cabl..e tel..evi.sion ordLnance r egarding pl..acement of the w ires underground. City Manage r Dial.. discussed w i th Council.. memorandum from the C~ty Manager to C~ty Counci1 regarding the Vo1unteer F ire F i ghters. City Ma nager Dia1 discu ssed the S tate Highway Department program for 1andscaping the ~~te r cha ng = ~t U. S. 285 and South Broadway. COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED,. COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED, THAT THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD APPROVE THE A G REEMENT WITH THE STATE OF COLORADO HIGHWAY I:EPA.RrMENT REGARDING THE HIGHWA Y 285 -BROA.DWAY INTERCHANGE WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD MAY REQUEST THAT THE AREA BE USED FOR GENERAL PA.RX PURPOSES A T A LATER DATE. Upon the ca11 of the ro11,. the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: Ay es: Counci1.me.n Senti, Lentsch, Lay, Dhority,. Brown, Schwab. Nays: Counci1rna.n K.re i.1i..ng. Absent : None The Mayor dec1ared the mot ion carried. City Manager D ~a1 recommended the approva1 of Mr. E. P. Romans, Parks and Recreation D irector ,. attending the 1 9 71 Congress for Parks and Recreation in Houston, Texas ,. on October 19-22,. 1971 . COUNCILMAN LENTSCH MOVED, COUNCII.MAN LAY SECONDED, THA.T MR. E. P. ROMANS, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR, BE AUTHO.R.I.ZED TO A'TTEND THE 1971 CON G RESS FOR PARKS AND RECREATION IN HOUSTON, TEXAS, ON OCTOBER 19-22, 1971. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote reeu1ted as fo11owa, Ayea , Counci1men Senti, Lent•ch, Lay, Xrei1inq, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Nay•: None Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried. • • 0 • • • • -6 - City Manager Dia1 reco~ended the approval of Hr. James L. Supinger, P1a..nni..ng Di.:ce.ct.or, atte.ndi.ng the 54th Annual Con.£erence of the American Institute of P1anners in San Francisco, Ca1i.£orni.a , on October 25-28, 1971. COUNCILMAN LENTSCH MOVED, COUNCI LMAN BROWN SECONDED, T~T THE A TTEN- DANCE OF .MR. JAMES L. SUPINGER , PLA.NNXNG DXREC'TOR, A T THE 54TH ANNUAL CONFE RENCE OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF P:I..ANNE.RS IN SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, ON OCTOBER 25- 28, 1971 , BE APPROVED. Open the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: Aye s : Cou.nci.1men. Senti., Lentsch , Lay , Krei.1i.ng , Dhori.ty, Brown, Schwab. Nays: None Absen t: None The Mayor declared the motion carried. City Manager D ia1 recommended the approval of Judge Haydn Swear Lngen , Muni.ci.p~ Court Judge , attendLng the Nati.ona1 Judges A ssociation Convention Ln Tucso n , A rizona , on November 15-19 , 1 9 71 . COUNCILMAN LA.Y MOVED , COUNC ILMAN LENTSCH SECONDE D, T !m.T JUDGE HAYDN SWEARI NGEN BE A UTHORIZED TO A TTEND THE NA.T :XONA.L JUDGE S A,.SSOCIATXON C O NVENTXON rN TUCSON , ARIZONA., ON NOVEMBER 15-19 , 1971 . Upon the ca...11 of the ro11 , t he vote resulted as fo11ows: A yes: Counci~en Senti , Lentsch, Lay~ Krei1Lng, DhorLty, Brown , S c hwab. Nays : None Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried. COUNCILMAN LENTSCH MOVED, COUNCILMAN KREILXNG SECONDED , T HAT T HE REQUEST FOR A UTILXTY EASEMENT IN THE S NOWBA.RGER S UBDIVISION , C :I:TY OF E NGLEWOOD , B E GIVEN TO THE Pl:.ANNrNG COMMISSION F OR T HEI R A CTION . Upon the ca.11 o f the ro11 , the vote resulted as fo11ows: A yes: Councilmen Senti , Lentsch, Lay , KreL1Lng, Dho r ity , B r own, Schw a.l:t. Nays: None .Absent: None The Mayor declared the motion carried . City Manager Di...a.l reported to Cou..n.ci1 on an e x change of pro per t y a1ong West Hampden Place between the City of Englewood and the Fir st Nationa l Bank of Englewood. Ci.ty Ma.n.aqer ni...a.J.. reported bri...afl..y to Ci.ty Council.. on the d.aulwaqe to treee caueed by the recent enow storm. Xt wae the c:on•e.n•u• o~ Counci~ that - the Ci.ty not p i.c:k up the broken bra.nc:hee and that the property oownera be i..netructed that they w1.11 be reaponei.bl..e ~or removal o~ the branch••· . , .• • • I' - - • • • • -7 - COUNC.J:LMAN DHOR.ITY MOVED, CCXJNC ~ J:.A Y SECONDED, TI:IAT HR.. HABl:.A.N SHATTUCK., 3054 EAST CORNELL CIRCIE, BE A.PPOXNTED TO THE LIBRARY BQIUU) TO F~ THE ONEXPI.RED TE.R.M OF MR.. MERLYN BEAVER. Upon the ca.l.l. of the ro11, the vote ~esu.l.ted as fo11owa: Ayes: Counci..l.men Senti, Lentsch, I....ay, Krei.l.i...ng, Dhori.t:y, Brown., Schwab. Nays: None None The Mayor dec.La r d th mot1.0n carr.J..ed. CO SENr"l: MOVED,.. COUNCILMAN LE.Nl'SCH SECONDED, TIQ.T MR. JOHNSON BA..Rl"'N, 4 332 SOUTH BROlUJWAY, BE APPOINTED TO THE PLANN:I:NG COMM.I.SS:XON. Upon the ca11 of the ro.l..l., the vote reau.l.ted aa fo.l..l.ows: A yes: Counci..l.men Sent i., Lentsch , Lay, Kreil.:Lng, Dh.or i.ty , Brown , S chwab. Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor dec.l.ared the motion carried. COUNCILMAN LENTSCH MOVED, COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED, THAT THE MEETING BE ADJOURNED. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote reau.l.ted as fo.l..l.ows: A yes: Counci.l...nten Senti, Lentsch , Lay, K.rei.l..i.ng, Dhor i.ty, Brown, Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor dec.l.ared the motion carried, and the ~eeti.ng adjourned at 11:10 P.M. Ex Officio C1erk of the Counci1 • • • • • • COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY OF ENGLEWOOD p COLORAJ!St,u C SEPTE.HBER 27 , 1971 ~~ ~Gl...::\.•00~.6!;7 r) SPECIAL MEETING: The C1ty Council of the City of Englewood, Ara p ahoe County, Colorado, met in special se&&1on on Monday , September 27, 1971 , at 8:00 P.M. The fo11ow1.ng ""Notice of Ca11" w as read b y the Deputy City Clerk. N<YriCE OF CALL BY THE MAYOR FOR A SPEC~ SESSION OF THE CITY C OUNC I L foK>NDAY, SEPTEMBER 27 , 1971 8:00 P .M. The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County, Colorado, is hereby called to a s p ecLa1 meeting at the C ity Hall , 3400 South Elat i Street, to con- sider the follow ing agenda : (1) Public hea r ing to consider th e 1 97 2 Proposed Budget subm itted by the City Manager. STANLEY H . DIAL City Manager SHD/ij ACKNOWLEDGEME NT OF RECEIPT OF NOTICE The following persons, all Councilmen of the C i ty of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby acknowledge receipt of N o tice of the above special session: /&/ Leo Lentsch /&/ aoward R. Brown /&/ D. J. Dhor ity /&/ E1mer E. Schwab /&/ John J. Lay /s/ M i1ton E . Senti /&/ John C _ K.reil:Lng Mayor Schwab , presiding , called the meeting to order and asked for ro11 ca11 . Upon the ca11 of the roll , the following w ere present: CounciLmen Senti, Lentsch , Lay, Kreil i ng , Dhor ity , Brown, Schwab. Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared a quorum present. A lso present w ere: Ass istant City Manager McD ivitt City At torney Berardini Deputy City Clerk Herndon Mayor Schwab e xplained that the purpose of the m.eetLng was to hold a publ1c hearing on the proposed 1972 Budget . COUNCI LMAN LENTSCH MOVED, COUNCILMAN DJ:IOR.l:TY SECONDED, THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED 1972 BUDGET BE OPENED. Upon the ca11 of the ro 1.1 , the vote resulted as fol lows : A yes: CounciLmen Senti, Lentsch, Lay~ Krei1Lng, Dhority, Brown , Nays: None • • - - - - - - -2 - Absent: None The Mayor declared the pub1~c hearLng opened at 8:05 P.M. NOTE: A tape recording of the public hearing is on fi1e with the official.. records of the City C1erk of the September 27, 1971, City Counci~ special.. meeting. ~ss istant City Manager McD ivitt came before Council.. to discuss the 1972 proposed budget. Mr. McD ivitt stated that there were no tax increases for the 1972 budget . He stated that the assessed valuation is $74,000,000, &nd that the mil..l.. l..evy for the Ci.ty of Engl..e-ood i.s the third l.owest of any city i.n the State of Col..orado . Assistant City Manager McDi.vi.t ~ discussed with Council.. the various sources o~ income, and stated that the major source of income i.s the sal..es tax. Counci.l..man K.rei.l..i...ng questioned the increase .i..n personal.. services. Mr. McD ivitt discussed bri.efl..y the proposed traLn~ng of City emp1oyees to assist the F~re Department~ He stated that the vol.unteer f i..rem.e.n were u.nabl.e to serve dur:Lng the day due to their empl.oyment. It was fel.t that the City woul.d have better control. over the cross-trai...ned personnel.~ Mayor Schwab stated that the C~ty woul.d receive cred~t for one fu~l. tLme fi.reman for every four cross-trai.ned personnel.. M.r. Mc.D i.vi.tt stated that 3 per cent to 6 per cent of the increase :i.n coremodi.ti.es and contractual. services attri.buted to Lnfl.ati..on . Discuss i on ensued. COUNCILMAN LAY' MOVED , COUNC:I:LKA.N SENTI SECONDED , THAT THE POBL.XC HEA.R.ING ON THE P ROPOSED 1972 BUDGET BE CLOSED. Upon the ca11 of the ro11 , the vote resulted as fol.l.ows: A yes: Counci..l.men Senti., Lentsch , Lay , Krei.l.:i..ng , Ohor~ty , Brown, Schwab. Nays: None Absent: None The May·or decl.are.d the publ.~c hea.ri..ng cl.osed at 8:50 P.M . The City Council. discussed bri.efl.y the tree l.Lmb pi.ck-up posi.tLon previ.- ousl.y taken by Council.. It was the consensus of Counci..l. that the Ci.ty pi.ck up the broken tree l.i..mbs. Ci.ty Council. action w i.11 be taken at a l..ater date. COUNCILMAN I...A.Y M O\TED, C OUNCILMAN LENTSCH S.ECCNDEO , T ~T THE MEETING BE ADJOU-RNED. Upon the cal.l. o f the rol.l., the vote resulted as fo11ows: Ayes: Counci.l.men Senti, Lentsch, Lay , Krei.l.Lng, Dhori.ty, Brown , Schwab. Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor decl.ared the motion carried , and the meeting adjourned at 9:00 P .M . Ex Offi.ci.o Cl.erk of the C ouncil. • -- '32xl - P recinct P reci.nct -Precinct P recinct Precinct Precinct Precinct P recinct P recinct Prec.i.nc.t:. Precinct P recinct Precinct Precinct ~Precinct • P recinct • • • • - L _,, '11 CO U Nc.J CITY OF ~ •· '-'-' '· G FiLE GLEWOoo. C OL_Q. ••s P ECIAL CITIZEN PROGRAM INVITE ES , October 4 ~ 1971.."" ~ J/..,.,.y~ ?? No . 1 -Mr . and --George w. Gorham , 1770 West Baltic A venue No. 2 -Mr . and M rs . Donald F . Corbet c., 2980 Sou th Bannock Street No . 3 -Mr . and --E mmett H . Chase , 2805 S o uth S h erman Street No . 4 -Mr . and Mrs . Robert w. Jon es , 3775 Sou t.b D elaware Street No. 5 -Mr . and Mrs . Edwin L. Di tt.mer , 2850 South Clarkson Street No . 6 -Mr . and Mrs . James v . L aBriola , 1230 Bates P arkway No. 7 -Mr . and Mrs . John R. R iter , Jr . • 3130 South High Streec. No . 8 -Mr . and Mrs . Glenn E . V olmer , 3375 South Washi.n-&ton Street 9 -Mr . and Mr s . Jack Y ork ,. 4070 S outh Grant Street 10 -Mr . and Mrs . Er ic. L. Buss , 4151 Sou th F ox Street No . 11 -Mr . and M _rs . Joe We n sky , 4161 Sou th Grant street No. 12 -Mr . and H rs . K en Grah am , 4421 Sou th F ox Street No. 13 -Mr . and Mrs. E . E . C a rpenter , 2940 West Saratoga Ave.nue No. 14 -Mr . and Mrs . George E . Glasier, 4975 S outh Lipan Drive No . 15 -Mr . and Mrs . Bill D awson , 4881 South Inca Street No . 16 -Mr . and Mrs . Sim Wit t en , 4720 Sou t h Sherman St reet • • • r 32x II: - • .. - - ""SPECIAL CITIZEN PROGRAM INVITEES , October 4, 1971•• Precinct No. 1 -Mr. and Mrs .. George w. Gorham. 1770 We st Bal. tic Avenue Precinct No. 2 -Mr. and Mr s . Donald F . Corbett., 2980 South Bannock St.reet Precinct No . 3 -Mr . and Mr s .. Erm:nett H. Chase, 2805 South Sherman Street P recinct No. 4 -Mr . and Mrs .. Robert w. Jones , 3775 South D el.a'Ware Street Precinct No. 5 -Mr. and Hr s .. Ed'""-n L. Dit:.tmer , 2850 South Clarkson Street Precinct No . 6 -Mr. and Mr s . James v . LaBrio1a, 1230 Bates P arkw-ay Precinct No. 7 -Mr. and Hr s . John R. Riter, Jr . • 3130 South High Street Precinct No . 8 -Mr . and Mr s . Glenn E. Volmer, 3375 South Wa shington Street Precinct No . 9 -Mr . and Hr s . Jack York , 4070 South Grant Street Preci-nct No . 10 -Mr . and Mrs . Er ic L. Bu ss , 4151 S ou t.h F ox Street Precinct No . 11 -Mr. and Mr s . Joe We n sky , 4161 South Grant Street Precinct No. 12 -Mr . and Mr s. K en Graham, 4421 South Fox Street Precinct No. 13 -Mr. and Mrs. E . E . Carpenter , 2940 West Saratoga Avenue Precinct No. 14 -Mr . and Mrs .. George E . Glasier. 4975 South Lipan D rive Precinct No . 15 -Mr. and Hr s .. Bill Da"Wson. 4881 South Inca Street -Precinct No . 16 -Mr. and Mrs. Sim Witten , 4720 South Sherman Street --- -T 32X - Precinct Precinct Prec inct P recinct Precinct Precinct Prec i nct Precinct P recinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct:. • Precinct • • • • -.. cryy c~/; F I C 1 A L' r CIL '?c;;>C UM~ ( ' .. 17 cou ""c: L _ ~ OF EN~ ' ~G FiLE: \.1\."ooo. c::o• ••sPECIAL CITIZEN PROGRAM INVITEES ,. October 4 , 1.971"" No . 1 -H-r. and Mrs . George w. Gorham,. 1770 West Bal. tic Avenue No. 2 -H-r . and Mr s . D onald F . Corbett , 2980 Sou th Bannock Street No. 3 -H-r. and Mr s . Emmett H . Chase , 2805 South Sherman Street No . 4 -H-r. and Mr s . Robert w. Jones, 3775 South DeLaware Street N o . 5 -HT. and Mrs. Edwin L. Dittmer,. 2850 South C1arkson Street No . 6 -H.-. and Mr s . James v. LaBriola,. 1230 Bates Parkway No . 7 -HT . and Mr s . John R . Riter, Jr .. , 3130 South High S t:.reet No. 8 -HT . and Mr s .. Glenn E. VoLmer, 3375 South Wa shington Street No. 9 -HT. and Mrs. Jack York , 4070 South Grant Street No . 10 -H T . and Mr s . Eric L. Bu ss ,. 4151 South F ox Street No. 11 -H-r. and Mr s .. Joe Wensky ,. 4161 South G r ant Street No . 12 -H-r . and Mrs. Ken Graham,. 4421 South Fox Street No . 13 -H-r. and M.rs . E. E. Carpenter,. 2940 West Saratoga Avenue No. 14 -HT. and Mr s . George E . G1asier ,. 4975 South Lipan Drive No . 1 5 -HT. and Mr s . Bill Dawson. 4881 South Inca Street No . 16 -HT. and Hr s . Si.m Witten . 4720 South Sherman Street • • '32xiC : : '-: I I : I • -• - ••sPECIAL CITIZEN PROGRAM INVITEES , October 4, 197t•• Precinct No. 1 -Mr. and Mr s a George w. Gorham, 1770 We st Baltic Avenue Precinct No. 2 -Mr. and Mr s . Donald F. Corbett, 2980 Soul:..h Bannock Street Precinct No. 3 -Mr. and Mr s . Emmett H. Chase, 2805 South Sherman Street Precinct No . 4 -Mr. and Mr s . R obert w. Jones, 3775 South Del.aware Street Precinct No. 5 -Mr . and Mr s . Edwin L. Dittmer, 2850 South CLarkson Street Precinct No. 6 -Mr . and Mr s . James v . LaBriola, 1230 Bates Parkway Prec i.nc t No . 7 -Mr. and Mr s . John R. Riter, Jr. • 3130 South High Street Precinct No. 8 -Mr. and Mrs . Glenn E. Vo1mer, 3375 South Washington Street Precinct No . 9 -Mr. and Mrs .. Jack York, 4070 South Grant Street Precinct No . 10 -Mr. and Mr s . Eric L . Bu ss , 4151 South Fox Street Precinct No. 11 -Mr. and Mr s. Joe Wensky, 4161 South Gra.nt Street Precinct No . 12 -Mr. and Mr s . Ken Graham , 4421 South Fox Street Precinct No. 13 -Mr. and Mr s . E. E. Carpenter , 2940 West Saratoga Avenu e Precinct No . 14 -Mr. and Mr s . George E . GLasier, 4975 South Lipan Dr:l.ve Precinct No . 15 -Mr. and Mr s .. Bi11 Dawson, 4881 South Inca 5 trelll!;t Precinct No . 16 -Mr. and Mrs . Sim Witt-en, 4720 South Sherman Street -• . J • ,.- • - .. SPECIAL CITIZEN PRcx;RAH INVITEES , October 4, 1971'' Precinct No . L -Mr . and Mr s . George w. Gorham, 1.770 West Bal. tic Avenue Precinct No . 2 -Mr. and Hr s . Donald F. Corbett, 2980 South Bannock Street Precinct No. 3 -M r . and Mr s . Emmett H. Chase, 2805 South Sherman Street Precinct No. 4 -Mr . and Mr s . R obert w. Jones, 3775 South D elaware Street Precinct No. 5 -Mr. and Mr s . EdW"in L. Dittmer, 2850 South CLarkson Street Precinct N o . 6 -Mr. and Mr s . James v. LaBriola, L230 Bates Parkway Precinct No . 7 -Mr. and Mrs . John R. R iter , Jr." 31.30 Sou t.h High Street Precinct No. 8 -Mr. and Mr s . Glenn E. VoLmer, 3375 South Wa shington Street Precinct No . 9 -Mr . and Mr s . Jack York., 4070 South Grant Street ~! r'! P recinct No . LO -Mr. and Mr s . Eric L. Bu ss , 4151 South F ox Street Precinct No. Ll -Mr. and Mr s . Joe Wensky , 4161 South Grant Street Precinct No . 12 -Mr . and Mr s . Ken Graham, 4421 South Fox Street Precinct No. L3 -Mr. and Mrs. E. E . Carpenter. 2940 We st Saratoga Avenue Precinct:. No . 14 -Mr. and Mrs. George E . Glasi.er. 4975 South Lipan Drive Precinct No . 15 -Mr. and Mr s . Bill Dawson. 4SSL South Inca Street • Precinct No . 16 -Mr. and Hr s . Si.m Witten. 4720 South Sherman Street • • • • ·• , -- • -• - ""SPECIAL CITIZEN PROGRAM INVITEES,. October 4 9 1971"" Precinct No. 1 -Mr . and Mr s . George w. Gorham,. 1770 West Baltic Avenu e Precinct No. 2 -Mr . and Mr s . D o nald F. Cor b ett , 2980 South Bannock Street Precinct No. 3 -Mr . and Mr s . Erm:nett H . Chas e, 2805 South Sherman Street P recinct No. 4 -Mr. and Mr s . R o b ert w. Jones ., 3775 South Delaw-are Street Precinct No. 5 -Mr. and Mr s . Edw-:l.n L. Dittmer, 2850 South Cl-ark son Street Preci nct No. 6 -Mr. and Mr s . James v . LaBriol.a,. 1230 B ates P arkway Pr@.cinct 7 -Mr . and Mr s . John R . Riter, Jr .' 3130 Sou t.h Hi h Street Precinct N o . -Mr . and Mrs .. Glenn E. V o1 r . 3375 Sout...h ash in ton Str Preci.nc t N o . 9 -H r . and Mr s . Jack Yorlo., .t.070 South Grant Stre L Precinct No . 10 -H r . a nd H r s .. Er ic L. Bu sli ., -151 SouLh F ox Stre-< Precinct No . 11 -Mr. and Mr s .. Joe w n s k y , 4 1.6 1 So:ut Gra-nt St..ree:t Precinct No . 12 -Hr. and Mr s . Ken Graham , 44 21 S outh F ox Seer ... Precinct No . 1 3 -Mr. and Mr s . E. E. Carpenter , 2940 w st Sarat...o . A v~nu Precinct No . 14 -Hr . and Hr s . George E . C1asi er. 4975 South Lipa.n Dr ive Precinct No. 15 -H r . and Hr s . Bi.11 Dawson . 4881 South Inca Street • Prec.i.nct No. 16 -Hr. and Mr s . Sim Witten. 4720 South Sherm.a.n S t:.re t • • • • • T 32XI - - - - - 0 - l?.e v .. and :~. Te rry Nevi.ll..e 31 00 S o . '":-"i:1.1.1.1..a.ms st . 3n l..o~ood . Co . 8011 0 En8l..ewood. City Coun.c:\...1 3400 So. E.1.&t:i. En 1..ewood. • Co . 801 1 0 Dear 5"1-.r: Oct.. 3 . 1 97 1 .· Me have i.n di..:sbe1:1.ef' f'ol..l..owed the case o£ Sybi.l.. Fabr i ca.:nt • and ~eel.. er-...b a.rras s ed .!'or our otherwis e wond$r£~ ci.ty .. I I I.n t hi.s a.ge when we .f'i.na.~y see that the earth has been bad..l...y mistreated . everyone sboul..d. be str::»n l..y encouraged to give nature back to nature . In.stead a£ a.sk.:1.n the citezen.s to put 1.eaves and. other con;postab1.e mater~ i..n p:l..asti..e bags t o .f":i...ll. our over .f'l..owi.ng g arba&a dumps • as the c:1.ty o.f' Engl..ewood has dona th:1.s ye ar . :i..t cou1d. be used t o u:.ake a c:1..t:1.z.en •s compost heap. ·.oft!: enc1ose an a.rticl..e .sh~g bow-th.:i..s has been done in !'·.:.i..ssou.r:1.. (Or a.n:i..c ::Yarden:i.ng Sept .. 1970 p .40). I!ope.f'u.l..J..y the court act:i..o.n a a~t Miss Fabri cant wi.ll. at l..ea.st have t he ood re.su:Lt or openL~ mo re peopl..e 's :::~s to what ca..n be one t.o r ht pol..l..ut i on . We hope that these ~~takes w~ be ~d~ate 1y corrected . and that C.i.ty Council and P arks and ~creat i.on Dept . 'W'i.l..l.. seriou.s1.y cons:i.d.er "t.he abo ve nent:i.oned articl..e . ~ce;M~~-6.__ 1 . cc 2 . cc :). ~ • ewood City Counci.l.. ~g1ev ood He ra1d The Denver Pos t enc . Or .. a.ni.c :ia.rden:1..ng Sept ... 7 0 . • -- r 32xl - • • 0 .. - ~ c:<i5 F F ' C:' I /' l. UME"f\rr I I r-LE" Ooo. cor..o C.ct.o er "-~, 1971 Er.~le~o~C -~~y ~ouncil '!400 ~-.e.l t.1 En!;lewoo.!,. -lo. ... 0 :;entlemen : My hu-..... ""nd an re f': ocke~ a~ t "1e -::>utco e o!" '!.~e !.riE 1 o*"' ::.!.es ..-yt il F b r .i c ant r e-<J.r in-h r co!D;o t hee.-. .;1~17en s~o •l ~e encour ved t.o m.e\::e co-r..:--ost.s in tead o!" be ns;: f"ined ··o r do in s:;,. ...o -w::.-ost!.n .. has be ~ a r o~nd ~o r a lon-t~~· an~ 1~ e co~rl tely re a ecta~le . log~cal and ~n !..e ll~£"e n t ,..ay o_ !:'e r t.111.z.:1n -t~r eart" nature • 11 way . nlso , J wo 1 l~~e ~o -n~~ v~y !-l a ti c be3s ~ e b e~n~ ~is t.ri.b~t.eC ~or ~h~ c o llect.i.on o lea ves. and ~ y ~tast1c bags ar even oe r~i~e C r.s r e - c~-t.acl es !:'o r t.rt's""~· :hi.!: r rol on:s d ec o:::a oeit.J.o n .sn<'! t.r.e tags j u ~t. be - c~~e ~or e ~ra sh . ~~ny o th r c ~t1 es a r e runni n g o u t o~ roo ~ ~o r th ~i r -arba.be • Just. bee u"'e t.., ::.enver 6r e. doesn 't ~a ve t.h i.o F r ab l e:::. ::et. doesn 't =.ee.n we won 't.. Are you 1 -:>o kin..,. eh a -' t.o t he :!'u t u re e t ell! •~·~ c.,.~'t ""~ e a ':nO~el c1!.. i:HJ ... e e.d of' ju!'!t. ~ollowin.v a 'f"ew s te s be'-1 i.nG eve r o""le el ne? !'a ~:e no""e i.n~t.i.at.:1ve.. l.oo k ro r be t.t.er met hods or t.r ....... dis "lOsal • .. e c.r e , !"'r c..n!.cly , ov e r ..,hel"1lec! t:~ t e ltck o ... concern !'or t he env 'ron ~ent. s~o-..tn , """O !'"c r.,. b:.· our co n c ity cou!"lc.i l. Ir :o u t.. inl: :r o u )-oave -=o r e p re s•- 1:n-. r obl-~. no,.,,. _. u -n&J !"'!.n~ ·ou: '-"J e rtone at a l.l to deal i.._.., P.!"'te r t,• e nr~t. election . ..e nee.:! and c:!e-_n-:! ci t y o!:f'1.c i..a l i!l who are =o re re 3 - -o!"l .ive to to 1 e:•'!: ecoloSJ ~r otle~e rt.r on~lJ ur ;e _.-ou to d e:non st.r a t.e your sin~erit.y ar. concern b. cs5i.n an ordinance p_nni tti ng co=.o tin ~. ~oser :inc Tay lor ~121 S . ill i.a:no Enr-le·~ood ,. RQ"10 '"189-21 0 9 II • • • - • - ::W:v .. .a.nd :-:r.s . ::'erry :.::c v..L1..l.e 3100 S :> •. i:i.l.l..i...a:r.s :>.t . Ens~cuo:>d . Co . 801 1 0 ?;ne_l..e·.::>od City Council. 3 400 So . E1at:1. Englewood . Co . 80110 Do..a.r S:i.r: c ou ~.~ crry OFt.. Oct. J , 1 97 1 . ~ FfL.E GLE" .. '\.C><>D. C:::.O:.. ·."'a h ave :i.n d :i.sbe l..i.c !:" .f'o1l..o::ed the c.a:o.c o!: S:rb'i.1 Fabricant • and :ree l.. er:barrasz.od £or our ot!'l.er-.:i.se ..-o!'"lc!cr!:ul.. city. In t his a~o wh~n ~o .f'in a ~y see that the earth h a5 been b adly mi.str o ::l.~e d . e'\.·e r ;:,-o~e .s!l:>ul::i b e str;:,r.:;l.y enco:.t:-a.zcd to g ive n ature back to nature . Instend o£ a s~1n3 the c itozens t~ put 1.cavcs and ot ~1.r.:r c~~p os tabl..e n:.atorial. i.n pl..astic baE;S to :I::i..ll. our ovur .!"l.ow i.nt; garbaso dumps • as the city o.!" E:"l,B:l..e.,.•ood. has done this year • it cou1:i be used to n:3ko a ci...tiz.en 's co-.post heap . ·~-.~c oncl..ose an .art1..clc zh~'t:i..n ~ how t h.i...s has been dono .1..n :-::i.!;s our:i., (Or anic :Zar::leni.n::; Sopt .. 1 9 7 0 p .40 ). Ho9oru.11y t ho co"..l.rt a=!..io!"l 3.-=.aL..,st !:i5s Fabr cant ".·:i1.1 <O.t l.c~t have:: the good r cs ul.t. o~ open:....--::; !"':Ora p O;O,?l.e 's e::,·.o:~~s to l.-::-:t.at. c an b e do~o to £i3ht po11u~ion . \·Ia hope t..h.a.t thes e r..ist.o.kes "rm bo :L-.r-.ed iate l.y corre c!..ad . and th .n.~ C :it.y Counci.l.. ~~d P a r}:s a.."'ld.. ::l.-::cr·e.o.t.!.o:n Dept . ,_."'i1.~ !;eri.ousl.y C01'1S i.dc r t.he abo ... ·e r:cnti.o:ned a.rt:i.c~o . Si.ncc r o l.y, / -;a::e ....... __ .~ _:· 'Y. _./ : t 1. En::1o-.:oo..:! C:i.t:;-::::ou..----:lc i.~ 2 . Z.."l.z1.eo.:ood ::e ra1.d. :J. Tho 09!'\vcr ?ost Or ~ani c ~n rde nin~ Se~t .. ?C. II • • r 32x - - - • • - :!c v . and :-:rs . ?e rry :!c-vi.ll.c 3100 S o . -ti.lli....3.ns st .. 3:-t:;l.cuoo::i . Co. 8011 0 Zn ~l.e~~od City Counci1 31-.J.O O So . E~a t.:i 1 En.:;J.e,.,..ood . Co . 80110 lJer;c.r S :i.r: Oct . ). 1 97 1 :.:e have in d:i..sbo l..ic!" :f"o:tl.o:.-e d the ca:oe or Sybil.. Fabricant • a..nd .:Ce e l. cr:.ba.rra.5sed £or our othcr:.:i.se w onde r!"u1 c i ty. In t h:i..s aGO ~-rhcn ;...·c £ina~y sec tha t the earth h .:l.S been b =:.d.J.y ro.is tr :!.t ed . o v e r yo:-:c should. be s t.r~r..:;l.y cncoura,::';ed to gi.ve n aturo back to nature . Ins t ead o£ ask1n~ the citczens to put .l..eaV OS and ot!lcr cO:-.:?OS t ,e::,]_o rn..a.tcriaJ. in pJ..a.sti..c ba::;s to fi..J...1 o ur ovo r £l..o\-ti..n~ t;a rbar;e dUinps • as t ho city o£ Eh.;1ewood. has dono this year . it cou~ be used to ~ke a c1t:i.zen 's com post h eap . ·,·!c oncJ.o..o;e an article sho'.·lin3 hol-r t his h as b een don e in :-:i..s.s ou.r:i.,. (Or.....,.ani.c :;.~~enL""ls; Sept . 1 9 70 p .40 ). Ho ~i:u.1J.y t ho court ac~io!"'l 33,.LLLTtst !li s F a.b r i.c c.nt .._.,r :i..J...l at J..oa..st ha.ve tho goo.:! l .....:!S ult o~ O ?~nL~:; r:o ro p 2 0,?le 's c :·-'3s to ;.-;hat can b e dor.o t o £i.=hL po11u~ion . We ho~e ~hat t hese ~~t~kc s wi11 bo ~~c diate 1y corre c~e d . and t hot Cj~y Counc i1 ~~d Par~~ a~d ~cr cn t ~on Dopt -wi1~ seriousJ..y c Or"lSi.dcr t..he abo '\.•o r:o.-.t:i.::>ned art.i.c1o . Si.nco r o 1 :--. / ~._, ~--·:....t _, (..J.A.(u'-- , .. E..~_::1c·.:o::ld C i.t.;,· ::::>u.!'lci.J.. 2 .. ~~1o-.:oo...l !!e ra1d 3 .. The ~~n vc r ?os t -• - • • • 0 - ?..c v . n.r.d :-::r-.::;. 'i"o rry ~.:c v~1 ~ 3100 S o .. ·:il.l..i a:-..s st . En~J..c•:::.=>d . Co .. 601 1 0 Zn.~1e ;:!:)od Ci.ty Council. .JI~oQ O So . E1.c.t.:i. =::rt:;J..e\.·ood . Co . 80 1 1 0 Do<!.r 5:i...r : Oct . 3 . 1 97 1 !J<. 1.. I I ·ra h .o.v a :in d isbe l.j,.e f" .f"oLl...o.._oed th e c ase or S:rbi.l. Fabricant . and :f"e e l. cr..barr.n.s !;e::t f:'O!." ou._r other:.::i.sc \"o'"0!'1c!e rf:u.J_ ci.ty .. In t his n::;e ·.-1h..:~ ·.:e :!"ina1.l.y sco tha t the. e.a:-th h as been b::.dJ..y mi..stro~t o d . CV.J:-j-:>!"!0 s!l:::>~:i ba s tr :>:r-:..:;1y enco:.t:-a.:;cd to g i..ve hat..u.r-:l back to nat.Ul:"'i3 .. L""lStc~ o~ ~~i.n.:; the c i.tezens to p ut 1 en.v os ar..::i othe r co:-.?c s t a.b1 e r:.atc.r:i..c.1 i.n p1ast:i.c bn..:;s to .rm o ur o vor :!"lo:-:i..n.::; r;a rbaco du.rn?s • as the c:i.ty o£ Ens1o· .... ·ooc! bas d o ne t..h:is y e ar . it cou1::i be used t o r!:a.ko a c itizen 's c o r..pos t h ca?• ·.-:o onc1o:::>e a..n a.rticJ..e shoui.n.:-; horr this has b e on done :i.n :-.:i..zs o~=... (0:-::;:ani.c :iar::ie n:L:; Sept.. 1 9 70 p .. 40 ). l-:!opo.!'"u..1.2y t.h eo c ou:-t ~-=~~o!"l .::1_:;c i....'>'l s t :~ss Fo.bri c~nt.. ·.,...ll..l. at. le a:>~ ho.vo t he G;O::>.:i re~ ~t o£ O?~ "i..:':.:; :-:o re pc-o?:!.e 's c:~":'s to ;.-:!'l.at c an be dor..o to £i.~h t. p;:,l.l.u~i.on . . :.;e ho:=-c t hat t..hcsc n:ista.kos y,;.i..l1 be ~--=~d1..o.tel..::~ cor rec~e d ,. a...'""l.d t..ha"t. C .i ":.y ::ouncil. a.-:d P ar:-:s .:L'"'l.::!. R.~crc~ti.o!'l :>;,p~. '""-i.~1 ser~ously c OtlS :L!cr ~!-.c .a.bo"-"0 r:c:-1.tionad. a.r~ic~c . Si.nccrcl.y . ~ 1 • ~"'l :::l.c·.:o::>.:! C l.t:,· ::=:t :..L-:c :1 l 2 . :: ... 1z1c· .. ·o od :!c r.:1l.d 3 .. Thn: !)-..n_v cr ?est / ' I. I ..:.LA • • • • (· I i I ~ :• I '· • .,_.; ~ .'' . I· • ' 1-\ ~ t • -.I• ·, ., ''I \ • --·~ •' ~··-~ \ ... I I' """' ) With th e support of iu resident s and local bus iness men, Neos ho, Mi sso uri , co mpos ts its lcrwcs to beat pollution and crcll/e a lo velier place to live . Autumn Le aves That Blossom In the Spring CHARLES ALLOXBf • • Til& DIIII .I.IA~'T Clli.OIIS of it S au· 1t1111n lea vrs orr resurrected each sprin~ in ~c01ho, ~lisM>uri. Si nce I!J6.1 , the sou thwestern OwL! town h.1s lx'tn using its Jc.wcs to nl.llt• compost,-a program co·. SflOIIM>Tl'U hy city m.magemcnt and .m iuclepcndrnt "Fiowcr·llox City" COIIIIIIillet•. Up·lo·d.llc r•'COrcls >IIOw that in the five yt·u rs of ill exiltencc, the city has produ et'Ci 3,:l:li tons of compo1t for nny of the rt~idcnts who wan t it. All has been m.1clr nvn il ablo on n "Hrsl· come, fi rst·scrvcd" basis, with no di· "'"'''""'in.,.,,.,....,,, I 'I ft~t ~i lll'~$11/f'll SUfl fiOTI J'ro#rtlll l Cit)' ••mp lorc•·• and ~<tnipment an• n11·d in thr progr.1111 , and <',lth year th e "Fiowcr·ll ox City" <~mmillrr A<'l< nhnnt $1,500 in donation< from hnsi· n''"""'n and other eivic·mindcd per· •on1 to pureha.<e li me, phosphate nnd nih•·r •imilar ih·m<. Cirki ng up the J,·,ll'''' bc~ins a< snou a< most of them hal't droppt·cl. Nro1ho.1ns mkr thrm to the rurh, whrre a Ci.mt Vac with its long anrl mol'.lhi<· MIOUI suctions them into the w.1itiu~ truck. Th<· tmck ho,!r il IS fret J on~. '''l'l'u f<~t wiuc, •i x f••ct high. nnd will hold nhou t 21 cubic y.uds of 1<',1 1'1'<-d<•tJCnding on their mo~turc l'Onh'nt. 1\ liAhl miu nrtunJiy helps to eompac t the leaves, hut If they're too wl'lllwymat. ··. .. ' \ Tot.1l •·o11 ;x·r <by for tin• tim~· loJd >dwduJ,. h.n lu•,•n .1 ••·r.1~111 g .1hont ~I 10. Tins iurlntl<'l th•· ,,l!,uic1 of thr trn tk unl'l'r .md the two men who h.mdlc the snclion ho.<1•, ph11 pro-r.lh'd t<tlt nf thr l<]Uipmrnt n1 ,·d . Thr1c ho1 c op••r,II Ors switch chorrs .11 short intrrval1 , anu the one who rakes the l<·.wrs .1ho n·mo•·cs slicks which wonld dog th1 • le.wr' anrl jam the hos1•. l:ity /)o rs ll rlle r }nil 0/IA"n/·Coll•••·l iu p II<'COrds, clo,cly krpt ol'er the yr.us since lht· progr.1m ht•g,m, show th,\1 city <·mploy<'<'> and city equip· ment r.m do the job bcll<'r and more <'conomi cally in time consumed and actu.1l CO!I th.m the indil'ichinl. Cur· rrnt fiAun•s cite lht• 1'011 of St75 prr t . I;· ·' ~ I 1; c ' ......... .. ' ~ I .... -.. ~ ... ; . .... ~' .......... J j • ·-• C""'l"'~ l'ilr~200.JII() frr/ lou~ nrc ~nr/cd rdllt a layrr of w;ru/inl, fnllo llr rl hy cou· nmf lmr.\C uumurt', lra t:rJ, .~TnllU IIIIer, rock IJIIII.fJII.atc, li111C, p/rtt cflirkn mamm:. ThTI·r h1ds nrc 1.1k1•n each a~·cm~e d.1y from tlw city strN·ts to the com· tlO'I groumil. li<'COrcls show tl~o~t the tnock will hold ~.4~0 pounds of leaves, anti thTI·e trips a"' mauc mh work · ing c!.1y. Notice of wh at pa rts of the city will he scrV!'d -and when-nrc nuhlidll'l l :tl lhe dorl nf IIIP 11m1""" hOUSI' 011 olll l'ight·hOII\('.1-iO·thc·IO.Id b.1sis. lnridt•n t,lll)', mfl.ll•on h.1s more th an doubled the Sl .SO n~u((• of 19&1. ~l o11 of th e lca~·,•s ""' o.1k. hut Ch.~rlrs ~orth, the origin.llor of the progr.1m who still snpmi 1c1 it in semi·rctlremcnt, says: "Wr ha1·c just niV'Iul 1'\WV l-in rl-••lm hi,.\·""" ""' I 0 • 1 l • t'ld,·r, m.tp!t•, o.1k -)'Ou n.tmr it, we'•·•· ~ot it." Tht· I•··'""' '"" tak1•n to the rom· J~ht ~roumil wh,•r,• windroll's :!00 to :)(X).(,·et ·ln~o~ .lrt' madt·. ll cre, in or· th·r of pl.tdn.~. h what Wt'lit int o the lli69 h.11ic t'OrnJlOi t ma tt•rial, rrady fur diltrihutiou in early 1970: :!.1trutkloa<h of 1.twd111 t 18 trutklo.1d1 of co wnnd horsr m •• nurc 51 lo.1d1 of kal'cs lb lo.1dl of litter from n chinchi11.1 mnc h 3 ton1 of ground rock phosphate 4 IOI!I of agricultuml lime , nnd 39 truckloads of chicken m,mure, including littrr, from broiler houses A scpar.1t e wind row hns topsoil, wit hou t rock1, mos t of whi ch was sc· cured from h.tscrncnt t•xc.wntions. Somr Uru rtio111 from ReJ itlrntl 1\ud what do Nmshoans thiuk ol thr · pro~r;1m? Sa id ~Irs. A. !. Lil lihrid~<·, forrnt·r Okl.rhom .m who c.une to i'it'Osho fo11 r Yl'i\11 a~o! "It's wondrrful. 1\ow I dou't have to II'Orry nllOut AC tt ing rid of till' lt·.tvt·s nnd perhaps polluting tht• ;~ir if I hum th r·rn. Aud n l'~t !prin g I t.m~dl'OII1J10\t in rtlurn .' ~Irs. Lor,, Mayc Bri g~s, native Ne- Oiho.m nntl nn ardrn t nd voc.1tc of or· ~.mit ~.trdt•nin~ pr.tcticcs, summed it up iu a ftw wortls. "It's simply great,' lilt' s.1id, ,md JlOintcd to her brilliant· ly hloomin~ fall flower garde n ns proof. r _____, I ·~ .... .. ,, I Th r sa wdu;t wh irh 1tnrts thr pile l i1 packctl by driving n truck over it. l 'l11c other ingredicn~ arc th,n nd d. • ~~1 in order. ! ,! I r i ., ~ I '''j ' .( I ' ~ tt·,,(·· -~ r··~~/. The windrows arc no mo re th an 6 fL~t high at top etnlcr an d 12 feet wide at th e IJOttom. If made wid rr, t·xpcricncc has sho wn that th e rnw L'Om{lO>t bums readily nml no nir c.m get to it. \Vhrn the ingredients in th1· windrows arc ready to be mixed , they nrc moistened with water but not mndc sog~y. It t abou t u wtoek, under norrn nl ron· tlitionl nnd s ubjt~t to the nvailnbilit)' of cit )' machim·ry nnd employees, the mmpost i• ready to be mixrd. Th is is att u.1lly done nbout five tim es, and the mix is ready for US() In from six Wl'l·h to tii'O mo.nths. In the fivr full yrars since thr pro- warn st~~rt t-d, 1111 nvcmgt• of 414 tons of l1HIIJl01t hns hrt·n u~o~d1· cnch yea r, .md nil of it goes into 71't'Osho Howt•r ~.udt•n, and hom In frorn nlJOut live ll't~·l s to t11o mouth s in early ~Jirin~. 1\onn.tl mix for flower gurdt•ns nnd l10xrs is one part rompost to three II • • ::. ... ~.,. .~ ·, _, .... .(~-::.-. J •. ~. .. ' Charlt1 Nonlr, ori~iuntor of th e l'rnwam, chill "'"· /.ora Brli!J:• in licr ur~anlc ~mrrr ~nrc/en, one of tile mmt popular ccolo~icol txliillitx lu Nr as/10 , Missouri. From the viCIVJlOin t of city mnn· nAcnwnt, thr progr.un is suct'C!IIu l in othrr way<. Kt ~·pin~ th e lc:t vrs on tht• Hf•"l bdtiml tho cnrb krt'PI th em fro m clogging catch basi~< when the !.ill r.tin< cornt· so stnoet swcrpcrs can concrntrntc ?n .cl~·aning t.hc gu~t;~s. 'l ........ .. ,.-:'""' ,. \ . , .. ...... ,,_,.__.,.. ... ~' ;-t-,~ . - .1' I ... ,... I . /, I· ' ·v , . " . ....... ,/.-. "'~r, I • ' ,· I I ~ I ;. ~''· 4'"' •. Y ..... ,. r . I "·' . .. ~~--- •, I .... .. ... _, . 1 j: L \ ·;, ~ ;. L._. __ k<,l.· •.• "'-tt..l.\i.t ·····-·l ·• TII B COIII/M .~ ;rile is mi.ml at rc~uwr t~rllllll 01 slwrc11, rai11g a frolll·cud /oat r.mu~ ami ~PI ill TliPTr It no limit In 1111 anrmml of rmnJHI.II von can 'lake rdih 1 " J 'I \o I ' ~ -~--;_~ ~'f· ...... ~ .. J, I ~ 1/ .;-- ''· .)....•-~ ··.!. -•• ],.., ;,' .. -. '"' . '·"" ~ J 4 ... , •• . - ', MULCH ... !'' I• lo . \• ( \ \. ,I --.\ .~. . .::~>~-; . :·.:~.: ::.:L< .. :· ~·~ _ __,__ \ "Fiowt•r.Jiox" C.llrn mitt co showed ju1t 0\'t'l 2,500 00II't'r ilOXCS nnd nllOUt 5(X) llowt·r ga rdrus in this city of s .. ~~ J lO J :ula,lior~. is ouc lk•Ju ty. spo t fo r t'at'h of 3,035 watt•r mrtm in the city, 1 , l'i nci ng l'lidcnct• that p.llticip.ttiOI t!lc ro~np~~t. pr~.gr.un is widcsp r I I . • - - • • O c t o~c r 4 , 1 9 7 1 E n =l c~:oo d ~~t y ~ou n c ~l ;,4 co -· El ... t.i E n :;l e·.:oo;;,. .; lo . ..._ 0 Jcn t.le-n.::n : • • - crry c:~C .. F t,c 1 A L ' -~ ~gcu M£NT ..,_, 4 ?- COU NCt L CIT'£ OF -r r- -...:>o.,... !"-!y :-:~-:-en cl C:-l:' ~ · ... e re s oc:...:.c*: o.~ t ~c o":.o~t.co e o~ t.~c t.r l~: o : .. ::ie c ,:;;t t i 1 re ~r,;.c c..n t :r c·c r ..;!n -i-: r c o ~:-o ::-t :,-c-c:~ •.. >i "'"-:i?e n £::'-::> 1 · ..._e e:nc o urL·c;e d t.o r:=~!=e co ~:o :;t..s i.n~t.eaC :::.-!" :::e n ~ f"::.ncC .-o r C.oi.n : s ::t . ..;o-.:--o n t.i n--fle e b e en e r o :.a n C ---=-r e lon --: t.i~ nn-'" !.!:l c c o-:;-1 -:.~e l .:; re ~ e c t.c:tl c ,. l o:;ic s l e n~ .in - t..e l li ~c !"",t.. ·.·n :,-o~ ... !'"cr t..i l i :-:i n_-: t.~.r:-e e.r t.-:.-., n L t.v :--e 's 1.:ay . J..!~o . 1 ·~.: .... -1 -= li ':a t.o · -...·"'-.y F l ~:-t.i.c ~s.::s 1r ! ~ l:ei ~-i s:t.r i b·J ~e r! ~o r ~h~ coll c -:..i o n o .. l e,....,_·cc , f<!•-,C. ·,.: y :-l ec t..ic ic .::;s c.r _ c·.-c:"l :"~r -.r:i~er '!:S r c - c e:-t.e.c l e ~ ::-o r!.: s ·::. ::.,1 ~ =:r o l o n-c c!t!C O-:_o s 1 t.ior.. e.:-t' t.~~ ::-::.::::;~ ~u c:t. be- c o:-:oe -ore t.rc :Jh . :-~n y o :..h r c ::.t.ic!:: e r e r un n!.n ;: o u t. o'" roo-., !"o r t h .... !r gc r l:-n::c . u c t. bee ,.~-..:: t ;.... =::c n ·.·e r £r ce do e"J .,•t. ,_~ve t.1.1.-F r o!l-1 :;::: :-·e t., d oe .:;~•t. :::ee~ -.... c -..·c'!'l 1 t .. !.r c 1·ou }":)o!::i!"'l -£>-~ .. e.r t.o t.""e :f"u t.u re c t. 11? .~r:.:: c ~r..•t. ..-:~ e E-:-:o-=c c i ".. 1.:-:~·e~J o!'" ~':..l~t. ~o lc,..·i-!-a r"e w !;t..e .-c. be~:i nc:! e v r •.·o1 ~ c !"te ? ~c..·:c :::-c i.ni t.i#-t.i,·e . :....oo:'!: :"o r Ce !.t..er r::c t.!-:'lod ::. c:.::.-. t~cs~-, di.SF~se.l. '.:e c:.rc , !'r L n'-=1 :1',. o·.• ... r ..:"nc l -r.c :! ~t. t.~·c l r c £ o .-co :1.ce r n f"or t.:;.-,a-env .:.r on..llcn t. s !"J.o· . ..:n ,. so !'"<::r, t:.· o~r o~n c5.1..y c o~-......:::1.1. I!" j *·u t i n~: :f 0 !-1 ~o::~ve =:o r e ;--r e t,S - 1.'!""1 -:-r o bl ~-:t::.-no~.·, J~U -:-. .2.;,/ !:'!.n r! ;:·o -...: !":!!"JC r.c:-1 e !"!t. &l.l t.o --!e !'"l ·.:1.._~ ~~l.c r t !:e n ex t. e l .-:'".:t.i o:-.. ..e :-:.c:::o~ e n ~ ~c i t,:,-o !""f'i.c i.:;:l .!:" --~ ~ &!'"e .:::o r e re "~- p.o n.:ooivc t o 't.o.:"~:·'.. c c o !o_:.:,· :-r o =l -·.::=. ..c =:t.r .::~on::,l: u r ~e ;...•;::;u t.o G c !lO n !!t.r ~;.t.- you r :::incc:ri ;t ~r. ~ c one err. by :::-~s in -c.n ord i-.r nc e ::" ~i.t."::.-1.-.~ eo.::::: a t.i.n.-: . J o se--~.1.:'1 ~ Te -,l o r ~1 21 . .3 •. i l li.r~= Zn -:1 -.:·.:o~,. ec.-0 7 89-::=.t o :;; • • • • • • - En::l c ::ooC ..:1. t;~ ..::ounci l ,!-4C O --El ~ t.1. l:.n:;le ... :oo.=. ~ .... lo. r:::j . 0 !-~y 'h':...l -"-!r""!'l c! L!"1. J. !:" OCk.c .· 0.~ t..1t:: O"..l lC F"~b r !.c !"1.t. !"".c!~c.r 1..-,;-h r C O!:::o =t. !"tee:-. .;1. c;_!;\:e co ::.:-o:=t.s .i n -t.cad of'" ~en~ ~!.n cC :o r s r ~._.n..J' -=-r c l o!'l--; t.i.-, nr:--: i r: c c o-:::.rl L t.e l t..elli ~c !"•'t. ·--·o;; o .-!"'ert..i.li.zin -: t."r::-:-ea rt.-.... nL C:::OU NC:jL I • • ... ...::=;; F I LE: C...D:::X' O f:: ENGL e ./000. co· ,- .e o!"" !1e !...r.ic..! o .-::.:.e::: .:.l ;.r't il 1.7cn -.e~:::t •l · !>e en c ou r. -cd t.o o in,:-s:l . ..;o~:--o.s t.:i ... -;'le..; be e n re ~ cct.c ~lc • lo ~ic ~l en~ i n - ure 's \lay . /.1~::.. : w.:---1 .:-: li ":e t.o ··:.-• w •"l • F l !: :o:-~ic !::!>.=;:s £! c tein~ Cis t.ri b·.t t.e C :-or !...h ~ coll e ction o -l e -vcs . en ~ ~ y ~l e:::t.ic b£~S c r _ even ~'r ~i ~c ~ c::: r e - c e:t.e cl e.=. !"'o r t.r ~::;· .• :"hi z-~rolo n.:-s ..-"c..c o-:.osit.ion an""' t.~~ ~:GbS ju s t. bc- c o~e :-or e t.rc.s!-1 . ::~n :.r o t.h r c .:.t.i cs e re r u nn in,£:;: o u t. o !"' roo-, !"o r ~h .... ~ r £:Crba -:c -Ju r.~ bcc .c.u !'"c t.~. :::'!;"n·~·e r ~ r -..e. doc!:'n 't '"l:n v e t."--i.s ::robl ~= ,:.·e t, do e::::;:--a 't.. =cc.-, we ".·'O!'l 't... J.r c you 1 -:>o!:i!'l -:7" nhe-e.d t.o t.~e !"u t.ure c..t 11? .-.r:~~ :~:~~o~: c~~:?~0 ~~~c c ~; "'C i.~~~~~;~~~c~u~~o~~l :.~;i.~:~~c;e;.c~~~~~ :~~ .. !~~ g '1 c:!i s_7o ~e:.l . •.:c 'L r c ~ !"r Ln '~l :.r , o·.l c r ... ·hc l :n e ::-t t '":e l tck o~ ... co:1c c rn !"'or t he e:"'l v .:r on ...... c n"L !lho\:n , so !"cr , t:: o u r· o ·.-·n c ity co~-,:::1.1 . I r :,·-!.! t. i n :: y ~!..l "-!:""l."e :::o re p r ezs - 1.:-1 ~ :-r ob l c"::~ n::l •. · • .:.,.-o u 7-~:f !"!.nA: ::o :.: !-:!"·•J c n :"'I.C =:t. c.ll t..o -::!e=-1 -..·!.!..~ E.:""t.e r t.!:e n c.x t. clcct.io:"l . ..e n c e.d ~n~ c!c ·-:--n~ cit;r o!"".f"i.c 1.~1 £ ~.-ho c.:-e ..:r:.o re rc .:s - :po:"'l.:;;i·..r e: -::.o t.o.""~::'--eco~o.:-.:· :-r -:.>tl -::-. ..c ct.r o!'l .:.l : ur.:.c _.·;:,u t o ode::.o:;,!:t.r =.t ::: you r sino.:E:.rity cor. • c or.cc .:-:-: by ?~~si n -Ln o rd!.'10!l:n.:e ::::-r::::1i t.ti:n ~ co..=: o t in-; • J onerhin ~ T r :·l o r 3 1 2 1 S •. 11 li.r -.::- ?:...,--;l• ... ·:o~"!, cc·,o 789-2109 • • • • • 0 ,. - A.RA.PAHOE REGX<>NA.L A~ P.R:IOPB.RrY SUBsYSTEM BOA.R.D CIP' DIRECTORS MEETING SEPTEMBER 1..5, 1..971.. REGULA..R MEETING: /, The Arapahoe Reqi.ona1 AutOBI.&te.d Property Subayste~~~. Pol..i.cy Board. .. t September 1..5 , 1971, at 7:30 P.M. Repreaentati.ves present: A..rap&.hoe County Li.ttl..eton Enql..ewood A..l..so present: John Ni.c.h.ol..l.. w. H. Wal..l..ace A. R. Bessette Larry Borger Wm. L_ Mc:.Divi.tt, A.l..te:rn.at.e Paul.. Wol..f, A.l..tez:nate Mil..dred. Leqqe WLl..l..Lam Van Scboonevel..d Ma. rt. i.n Burk..al:ap The meeti..nq was ca.l..1ed to order by Preai.d..e.n.t Wa11.ace. M.R. BORGER MOVED, MR . NXCHOLL SECONDED, Tl':a.T THit MINtJTBS CJIP THE .RBIGULA.R MEETING OF AUGUST 1..1, 1971.., BE APPROVED AS READ. Upon the cal..l.. o_r" the. ro1..1, the vote resulted a,_a fol..l..ows : Ayes: Messrs. Bessette, Borger, McDivitt, Ni.chol..l.., Wa..l..l..ace. Nays: None The Presi.dent dec1ared the mot i.on carr i ed • MR. NICHOLL MOVED, MR. BE.SSE"rrl!: SECONDED, T.l:IAT THE PXN'ANCZA.L ~ FOR THE MONTH OF AtxiOST, 1..971.., BE APP.RO'VED. Upon tbe ca1l.. of the rol..l.., the vote resul..ted fol..l..ows : Ayes: Messrs. Bessette, Borger, McDi.vi.tt, Ni.chol..l.., Wa.l..l..ac•. Nays : None The President decl..a..red the motion carried. • • • • • 0 - - 2 - MR.. BORGER MOVED, MR. NICHOLL SECONDED, TJ:I"I\.T THE PURC.HA.SE OF CAPrrA.L EQUXPMENT :LN THE AMOUNT OP $267 .50 BY MR. KIRSCHNER BE APPROVED. Upon the cal.l. of the ro11., the vote resul.ted as fol.l.ows; Ayes: Messrs . Bessette., Borger, McDiv itt , Nicho11., Wa11ace. Nays: None The Pres ~dent decl.ared the motion carried. President Wal.l.ace noted that Item 6 on the agenda deal.inq -ith reports on the approval. by the Cities of Engl.eW'OOd a.n.d Li.ttl.eton and the County o.£ Arapahoe to extend the A.RAPS Aqree.me..nt i...nto 1972 had a.l.ready been made by the three jurisdictions, noted in the minutes of August 11, 1971. MR.. NICHOLL MOVED, MR. BESSE"rrE SecoNDED, THAT AUTHORITY BE GRANTED THE STAFF TO MAKE NECESS~ PUBCHASES WITHIN $1.00.00 WrTHOOT PR.ZOR APPROVAL OF THE BOARD. Upon the cal.l. of the rol.l., the vote resul.ted as fol.1o-s: Ayes: Messrs. Bessette , Borger, McDivitt, Nichol.l., Wal.l.a.ce. Nays: None The President dec:1a.red the motion ca.r.ri...ed. MR. NICHOLL MCJ'VED, MR. BESSETTE SEC~DED, THAT THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE • S RECOHMENDA.TIONS IN THE DECOMPOSITION DOCUMENTS STAPF STUDY BE APPROVED. Mr. Van Schooneve1d noted that he had shown the report to a. highl.y qua.1ified systems a.na.1yst not connected with the ABAPS project and it his fee1ing that the report was most sa.ti...sfa.ctory_ Hr. Larry Borger stated t.h.a.t the most i.m.porta.nt aspect of the study was that .1.t wou.1d charge the Executive Committee with the responaibi.1ity or forma1izi...ng po1ic:y recommendations to the Board which Ln turn wou1d give the project coordLnator needed direction. Upon the ca.11 of the ro11, the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: Ayes: Messrs. Bessette, Borger, McDivitt, Nicho11, Wa11ace. Nays: None The President dec1ared the motion carried. • • • T 32X [ • • • • 0 - -3 - M-r. Borger i.ndi.ca.ted t..ha.t the Li.tt.l.eton City Cou.nci.1 had approved in fu11 a ~emorandum setting forth Litt1eton•a expectations ~ith regard to the ARAPS project~ which memorandum -as received for the record. Mr. Borger emphasi-zed t.h.a.t the Cou.nci.1 wou..l...d l..:Lk.e to conti...nu.e t.b.e: em.:pha.si.s on the l..and parce1 system, rea.1i.z.i.ng the i..m;portance of t.h.e A..&&es&o.r, Cl.e.rk and Treaau.rer functions. The City wou1d 1i..ke to have the Fire, P1.&n.ni...nq. and Bui.1d..i..ng functions automated i...f a.t a.11 poas:Lb1e by Septealber or Oc-tober of 1972. Mr. Borger emphasized that this i.& a goa1 of the Li.tt1eton City Counci1 but not necessari.1y a. sine qua non for conti.nued approva1. It w as the consensus of the Board that this wou1d be a. most di.~£i cu1t go~ to achieve but that it was we11 worth stri.vLDg for. Mr. McD ivitt reported that the City Cou.nci.1 of Enq1ewood had not yet been 9 ive..n a statement of goal..& but that such a statement wou..1d be pre- sented and acted upon :i..n. the near future_ Mr_ Ja.~nea Col.l..i.na, Personnel.. Director, City of Littl..eton, reported that seventy appl-ications for Project Coordinator bad been received and that he expected several.. moore as a resul..t of adverti..si.nq which ha.d juat appeared in the Col..orad.o Mnn icipa1ities magaz ine _ Of the seventy app.1icat..i..ona, he aet asi..de eight for possibl..e detail..ed study by the Board, feel.Lnq that these eight met a.11 the requirem-ents set forth i..n the adverti&eJaent_ Mr_ N.i.chol..l.. stated that he woul.d l.i..ke for the Executi ve C~i.ttee to revi..ew a1l.. of the app1icati..ons and report back to the Board •• soon possi.b1e_ In M.r_ Lyon •s &bsen.ce it -•• a9Yeed t.h.a.t M.r_ McD ivitt -ou1d serve on the Execut i ve Committee for this screening task- The Board w il.l. meet again on Tuesday, September 2 8, i.f su~fici.ent screen~q of the appl.icants has been accompl-ished_ Mr _ Borger di..scussed the Emergency Empl..oyment Act and i.n.di..cated that someone -ho might work with the ARAPS project coul..d perhaps be emp1oyed under the provisions of thi.s 1egisl..a.tion_ Mr-Borger w i l..l. report back to the Board on the status of thi.s project_ MR-BESSETTE MOVED, MR_ Nl:CHOLL SECONDED, TtaT TIE MEETING BE AD- JOURNED_ Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote reaul.ted as fo11owa: Ayes : Messrs_ Bessette, Borger, McDivitt, Nicho1l.., Nay&: None The President decl..ared the motion ca.rried and • • • I' - - - - 0 - 0 .y co WORKABLE PROGRAM C ITIZENS• September 9. 1971 Regul.ar Meeting C O 't.floti TTEE COL Cl.'X:X O F C ....... ._ Members present : J ~ Louis Parkinson , Reverend Herbert Hosanna; Mal.col.m E. Co11ier; Edna Hero; Dr. Char1es Zartman; Jacques Stackhouse; Bi11 Boom; Cba r1e s Henning; Edna Tourtel.ot; Herbert Mosbarger; Beverl.y Gonza1es; Berry S1ater ; Wi11iam Stevenson; and G~1bert Va1dez. Members absent: Dennis Ke11ey ; Vi Weist; Henry Cokayne; Tom Hoogendyk; Judith B. Henning; Mil.ton Senti ; Russe11 Woods, Jr.; Reverend A11en Strong; George Jobnston: Ruth A11en; Pat Decker; Paul. Shattuck and David L. Beachy. Other persons present: James L . Supinger. Director o f P1anning ; Wi11iam Brokate . Chief Bui1ding Inspector ; Art C onstance. 2701 South O gden St., Eng1ewood. The meeting was ca11ed to order at 7:40p .m •• Chairman Parkinson presiding. The reading of dispensed with by Mr. Sl.ater , the Minutes of the August 26 , 1971, meeting was and upon a motion by Mr. Stevenson and seconded the Minutes were approved . Chairman Parkinson reported that ~tts. Harl.an L. Shattuck, Jr •• the mother of Paul. Shattuck~ representative of the Engl.ewood High School. student body, bad notified co~ittee member Judy Henning that Paul. is no l.onger in Engl.ewood and that he wi11 not be abl.e to continue on the co~ittee. Mr. Henning moved, Mrs . Hero seconded~ that the resignation of Paul. Shattuck be accepted. The motion carried. The committee then discussed the best procedure to fo11ow to get the names o f at l.east two students from the high school. who woul.d be interested in serving on the co~ittee. :It was suggested that Mr. Don Loptien . Director of Pupil. Services . be contacted for names of students . inasmuch as in his position. he has contact with both the City Campus students and the High School. stude nt council.. It was al.so suggested that students at Metro State or the Arapahoe Junior Co11ege might be in- terested in serving on the committee. C hairman Parkinson introduced Air. Art Constance who was ob- serving the meeting . Mr. Constance, who resides at 2701 South O gden Street . stated that be was very much interested in • -0 r 32x - • • • • 0 - the possibi1ity of the City participating in the FACE program (Federa11y Assisted Code Enforcement). A 1etter o~ resignation from the committee signed by David L. Beachy. the Inter-Faith Task Force representative, was read. Mr. Stevenson moved, Mr. S1ater seconded, that the resignation o£ David L. Beachy be accepted. The motion carried . The fo11owing memo from City Manager Dia1 was read: "TO: Workab1e Program Citizens• Committee FROM: DATE: Mr. Stan1ey H. Dia1, City Manager September S, 1971 SUBJECT: BUDGET REQUESTS FOR 1972 Thank you for submitting to me the Committee•s request that $4,000 be budgeted during 1972 for your operationa1 expenses. ~-Supinger has a1so expressed your thoughts regarding additiona1 staf~ing for environmenta1 code~ enforcement, the appropriateness of the Co~unity Deve1opment Department or- ganizationa1 approach, and the need for staffing to provide for an effective Housing and Redeve1opment program. Due to the budget review schedu1e, your request has not been inc1uded in the suggested budget for the Community Deve1opment Department which has been submitted to City Counci1 . However, I, and I am sure the City Counci1, wou1d we1come your tho ughts re1ative to the 1972 Budget for the C~unity Deve1opment Department as may be affected by your anticipated programs . It is suggested that you review the attached proposed budget for the Community Deve1opment Department and submit your thoughts some o£ which might re1ate to: 1. Organ~zationa1 approach; 2. Staffing (adequacy or inadequacy; and/or 3. Budgeted amounts. Cordi.a11y yours, /s / Stan1ey H. Dia1 STANLEY H. DIAL City tanager SHD/ij Enc: Proposed Budget Organizationa1 Chart Proposed Budget Community Deve1opment •• -2- • • • r 32xl • • • 0 ,. - Mr. Sup~nger reported that s~nce the meet~ng on August 26th at which the Committee had discussed the need for additional housing ins p ectors , Director of Personnel. Murphy has been in- £ormed that the City will. have an opportunity to appl.y for f und s to hire four additional. e mployees under the Emergency ~pl.oym e nt A ct o f 1.971.. One of these p e rsons will. have to be a veteran dis c harg ed since 1.964 and the other three wil.l. ha v e to b e either unemployed or under-empl.oyed. It is anticipated that the C ity wil.l. be el.igibl.e ~o receive around 527 ,000 and the progra~ wil.l. run for an i nd efi ni te period of time---from 10 months to pos si bly two years . One of the job desc riptions that has bee n submitted is f or a buil.d ~n g inspector, and Mr . Supinger and Mr. Brokate are hopeful that the building in- s pection staff wi11 b e s upplemented through this program. It was the fee ling of the C ommittee members that even if an addi - tional inspector were to be made a v a i labl e under this Eme r gency Act. that the Ci ty C ouncil should provide for at least one add i tion a l f ull -time housing inspector to help carry o ut the proposed area by area code e nforcement. A£ter :further co n siderat i on o f the code e nforc ement program. Mr. Henning mo v ed . Mr. Mosbarger seconded. that the Chai~an write a letter to t he City Council expressing the opinion of the Work able Program Citize ns~ Committee that it is n ecessary to provide em phasis to an area by area cod e enforcement pro- gram in the City . and that the Council should make the necessary modi fic at ion s i n the 1972 budget to provide for sufficie n t i n- spection personnel to carry out this progra.m; to do this . the C ommittee has reached the c o nc l u sion that the City C ounci l should gi v e e very c o nsideration to the employme n t of at le a st one additional f ull-time building inspector in 197 2. During discussion on the motion , it was e mphasized t h at there is no assurance that an inspector wi11 be hired under the Emergency Employment Act o£ 1971 and that the inspector refe rred to in the motion under c onsideration would not be one hired under that p rogram; but would be a permanent addition to the i n spec~ion staff . If nn inspector -ere ~o be hired under the Emergency Employment Act . that person would be in addition to the additiona1 inspector which is being recommended . Discussion of the motion also l..ed to consideration of the problem of getti n g ""1ega1 support .. for code enforceme n t as wel..l.. as the l..engthy delays invo1ved in cases filed with the C ourt~ Mr. Collier e xpressed c oncern that many people who w ou l..d be af - fected by the c oncentrated code enforcem e n t woul d not hav e the resources to bring their homes up to code and that som e m ea n s must be mad e available to assist them. The question o n the motion was called . and the motion ca r ried unanimously ... -3 - • • • ~'32 x • • • • 0 - Th e operating expenses of the Workable Progr am C itizens' C om- mittee was then considered. Reverend Hosanna moved ,. Mrs. Hero seconded, that the Workab1e Program Cit~ze n s· C ommittee request the City C ouncil to g ive serious co n sideration to including the amount of $4,.000 in the 1972 Bud get f or the operating expenses of the Committee, including ,. but not limited to, secretarial expense, dup1icating costs and travel, it being the opinion o f the Committee members that the Commit t ee ca n be more f unctional if the necessary runds c an be made avai1ab1e to cover the expenses which are incurred .. The motion carried .. The c oncept of the proposed Department oL C ommuni~y Deve1op- ment was con sidered.. Mr .. Supinger said that it wou1d be necess ary to have the C ommittee's reconunendation in this matte r by the Publi c H earing which wi11 be he1d to consider the bud get on September 27 ,. 1971 . Mr. Stevenson moved, Mr . Henn~n g seconded, that D~rector of Planning Supinger draft a suitable endorsement of the Depart- ment of Community Deve1opment , setting forth the need for an Assistan~ Director of Housing and Redevelopment and to have the dra~t available at the September 23rd meeting of the Com- mittee . The mot1on carried .. Mr_ Brokate was tben ca11ed upon to exp1a~n the difference between the Housing C ode and Building Code and to report on prob1ems that the Building Department has run ~nto when en- £orcing the Hous ing C ode .. ~r .. Brokate sta t ed that the Building C ode app1ies on1y to structures that w~11 be bui1t and that the Housing C ode ap- p1ies to exist1 n g structures.. The standards set forth in the Hous~n~ Code are not as restr~ctive asthose in the Bui1ding Code .. Mr .. Brokate sa~d that a permit has to be taken out under the Bui1d~ng Cod e ror 1nterior remode1ing which costs in e x cess of SSO. A1 so ,. if the cost of repa1rs made to a house in one year equa l s 75% of the va1ue of the house,. the Bui1ding Code must be met "i.n a11 respects.•• Mr . Brokate said that most o:f the offenders that the Inspectors have ··ru n in"to·• .... hen enforc~ng the Housing Code are absentee 1and1ords~ who, in his opinion ,. can a fford to make the necessary re p a1rs. Ho wever ~ some of the offenders are e1der1y persons with 1i.m~ted 1ina n ci a1 means .. In the case of the 1atter,. even though the inspect or is very sympathetic~ if the vio1ation is a case of safety---an out and out hazard which cou1d cause -4- • t·• • • T 32X - - 0 - death or injury to the occupant---~ediate steps are taken to cease the use of the house or the hazardous appl.iance, such as a furnace, until. the defect is corrected. Mr. Brokate ex- pl.aioed further that the Housing Code is enforced at this time on a ''compl.aint'' basis. The possibi1ity of requiring a housing inspection before a house is rented or sol.d was considered . Mr. Supinger reported that the ICMA (Inter-national. City Managers• Association) had considered the Residential. Occupancy Per.mit in an articl.e about a year ago. Ways of enforcing such a code were considered and Litt1eton, Col.orado , and nivers~~y Park, Missouri, were cited as two cities which do have such a code. The legality of inspectors entering a bouse without a warrant was discussed. Mr .. Brokate stated that the Inspector carries a badge and City identification under the authority of the Municipal Code , and if persons refuse to admit an inspector, they then go through tbe Court to get a warrant. He added that this step had been necessary only once in five years. Reverend Hosanna stated that in his opinion, it is the res- ponsibil....i ty of the City to assist those peop1e who cannot af- ford to make the necessary repairs to bring tbeir homes up to Code. Mr . Parkinson suggested that this is the purpose of the FACE (Federa11y Assisted Code Enforcement) program. The possibility of requiring persons who build apartments to provide a certain number o~ them for low income families, was raised by l\trs. Tourte1ot. Mr . Henning commented that this is being done in New York and that he understood that an ordinance had been passed 1 n Fairfax County. V irgi nia. requiring that 15% of the new housing has to be for low and moderate income families . Mr. Collier expressed the concer n that such a pro- vision could deter f urther building or living units because a developer won· t build i£ he ••can· t make money••. Reverend Hosanna stated that, in his opinion. this is exactly the reason the City needs to estab1ish a Local Housing Authority, so that the necessary housing can be provided. ~tt. Supinger explained tha~ the Workable Program application has been worded in such a way that the City could app1y ~or the FACE program if it shou1d be determined that this particu1ar pro- gram will be necessary to accomplish the goals set forth in the Workable Program app1ication. Chairman Parkinson directed the C ommittee's attention to the Workable Program application which had been ~ab1ed at the last meeting fo11owing the consideration of pages 2 through 10. -5- • , -- • • 0 ... Reverend Hosanna moved . Mr. S1ater seconded ~ that the cons~dera tion o£ tbe Workab1e Program app1ication be removed from the Tab1e. The motion carried. The Committee then considered those sections of the app1ication which have been revised to conform with suggestions made at the Ju1y 1st meeting. HOUSING AND RELOCATION: Housing Requirements; Page 10. §1: No change. Page 10. §2: Page 11. §3: Page 11. §4: Page 11. §5: Page 12 . §6: The South Suburban Board of Rea1tors has been added to the 1ist of s ources of information for the estimate o f the number o f 1ow and moderate- income families 1iving in sub-standard hous~ng. etc. This section bas been comp1ete1y revised in ant~cipation of the creation of a Loca1 Housing Authority and the establishment of a Department of Community Development. Not app1icab1e. This section has been expanded upon to exp1ain that at this time. the City does not have an adequate housing program but that steps are underway to implement such a program. This section has been reworded at the s u ggestion of the Committee; there were no suggestions made to change it further. Relocation Requirements: Page 12. §1a: No change. Page 12. §1b: Anticipating the creation of the Department of Community Deve1opment by the time the app1ica- tion is referred to HUD. that Department is identi£ied as the 1oca1 agency which wi11 ad- minister the re1ocation program for any persons disp1aced by g overnmenta1 agency. Page 13: Page 14. §3: Page 14. §4: No changes. This draft has been rewritten to identify groups cooperati ng in the provision of re1ocating serv~ces. No further changes were suggested by the Comm1ttee • No change. -6- • • • • • Page 15: Page 16., §6: Page 16., §7: Pa ge 17, §S: • 0 - Not app1icab1e. Not app1icab1e. A se nte n ce has been added to exp1ain that the requested information is not avai1ab1e at this time. Some of the C ommittee members suggested that the se vera1 programs wh i ch are avai1ab1e under HUD s hou1d be set forth i n the rep1y to this section. Mr . Supinger stated that i n his opinion. the City does no t yet know what . if any., programs wi11 be c onside r ed and that to identify specific prog rams at this time., c ou1d prove restrictive to the City at a 1ater date. The secti on was 1e£t as it had bee n rewritten. C itizen Invo1ve ment : Page 18: No ch ange . Pa ge 19. §1 (c) Page 19 • §1 (d) Pa ge 20~ §2: No cha n ge. Rather than simp1y referring to the Minutes o£ the Workab1e Prog ram Citizens• Committee meet i ngs~ a brief resume of the Committee has been gi ven. The C omm ittee did not suggest any further changes . The coordinat ion between the members of the Com- mittee and the organizations they represent is summarized in this section. Members of the C ommittee disc ussed the possi.bi1ity o f hol.ding a publ.i c £or um to expl.ain th e appl.ica tion before it is referred to the City C ounc i l.. Several. members s aid that they were pl.anning to make a com pl.ete report to their organizations when the appl.ication has been put in a £i nal. for.m~ and that they fel.t the forum woul.d make it possibl.e for al.l. o f the organiza- tions to review the appl.ication at one time. It was al.so s u g - gested that a summary statement cou l.d be pre pared b y the staff for the members to use in reporting to their respective g roups so that they woul.d be sure to cover al.l. of the pertinent points . :\lr. Supinger suggeste d that such a summary coul.d al.so be in- cl.ud ed i n the Util.ity Depa~ment•s mail.ings in order that it c oul.d be reviewed by a11 of the residents of the City. Oth er methods of getti ng the information about the C ommittee and the Workabl.e Program to the publ.ic were considered. in- c luding n e w s pape r rel.eases and information sent to the homes th rou gh schoo l. c hil.dren. Ways of adequatel.y informing the e l.de r l.y were of parti c ul.ar concern. -7- , • • - - • • Page 20, §3: Page 20 7 §4: • 0 - .... This section bas been rewritten at the suggestion of the Committee; they made no further changes. This rep1y bas been comp1ete1y revised. Sub- section f, which refers to the Committee•s recom- mendation to the Ci.ty Manager that the proposed C ommunity bui1ding be omitted from the Capita1 Improvement Program, was discussed. It was suggested that this section cou1d be amp1ified somewhat, and Mr. Stevenson offered to bring the Schoo1 Board po1icy on the use of schoo1 faci1i - ties to the next meeting so that this information cou1d be incorporated in the rep1y, if necessary. Mr. Parkinson suggested that the Committee members review the r ·evised app1i.cation before the next meeting and to note any co~ents or questions that they might have concerning the ap- p1ication . He asked that the consideration o~ the app1ication be p1aced on the agenda ~or the next meeting and said that he wou1d ca11 for the consideration of any further amendments to the app1ication at that time. Mr. Henning moved, Mr. Stackhouse seconded, that ~u.rther con- sideration of the Workab1e Program app1ication be tab1ed ti1 the next meeting . The motion carried. New Business was ca11ed for. There being nothing further to bring before the Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Recording Secretary, Pro-tem -8- II • • 0 0 - 0 • _) 0 • - - • ( ( CITY c:<&E: fc',E b~cLUMENT C ITY OF E GLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING C OMJ.tiSSION '.. /1 SEPTEMBER 8~ 1971 I . CALL TO ORD ER . The Regu1ar !\1eeting o £ the City P1anni.n g and Zoning to order at 8:00 p.m . by C h ai.rman Ca r1son. C ommission was ca11ed ~lem bers pt-ese n t: H e nning ; Mosbarger; Patrick; Senti; Vobejda; Weist: C a.r1son Sup~nger~ Ex-o£ricio .Members abs nt : Le ntsch A1so present.: D. A. Romans, Assistani Director of P1anning A1an Koeppiog, Draftsman II . APPROVAL OF Ml~ TES. Chairm.an Ca rlson state d that the Minutes o:£ August 17, 1971, were to be considered £or approva1. Henn i n g moved: losbarger sec onded : The motion carried The Minutes o:f August 17, 1971, be approved as written. I I I. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 0'1 STRICT CA SE =-1S-71A August 17. 1971 M.r . C ar1son asked that Mr . Supinger review the proposed amencbnent to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Supinger st=-.ted that the pub1ic bearing on ~he proposal. has been set for September 21st. and that pub1ic notice has been given in the officia1 City Newspaper. the Eng1ewood Hera1d. ~~-Supinger stated that the proposed amendment wi11 give f1exibi1ity that is not prese nt1y avai1ab1e to devel.opers. and wi11 be of he1p in redeve1op- ment o£ ~he o1der areas of town . Mr. Supinger stated that the Pl.anned Deve1opment District wi11 be ·•superimposed'' over an existing zone district. thus the use and densities perm.itted reTnain "'fixed'' • and the f1exibi1ity is given in the 1ocation of the structures. the abi1ity to construct a four - pl.ex on 100 ft . frontage in an R-2-B Zone District rather than two dupl.exes. for examp1e. Mr_ Supinger stated that the designation of a P1anned Oe - ~~!:i::~~n~1!~~~c~h!~r5~!c~~i~: ~=~!~i~i~:i~v=n~p:~~v~! ~~p!~~e:1 ~~~~0 'o the courts. ~~-Su p i n ger stated that detail.ed p1ans for the P1anned Oe- vel.opment must be subm~tted at the time of the appl.ication. and if approved. must be devel.oped according to those p1 ans. City Atto•-ney Bera rd.1.ni entered the meeting .. Mr . Weist asked ,:\tr . Supinger what kind of devel.opment under the proposed amendment coul..d b expected? Mr. Supinger stated that he fel.t th:i.s pro- posa1 cou1 d be utilized in developing raw land. and a1so in providing incenti v e and f1exibi1ity for redevelopment in o1der sections of town. Mr .. Su p.1.n ger p ointed out that there is no size restriction wr~tten into the p ro posal. and stated that it is the feel.ing o£ the staff that f 1ex:i- bi1ity is needed j ust as much and maybe more on sma11er developments than it is on 1arge deve1oprnents. Mr. Lents ch entered and took his chair with the ComiDission .. Mr. Weist asked it: the expenses a developer wou1d go to to provide the detailed plans. etc.~ to submit with the application might prec1ude making use or this provision for sma11 deve1opments? Mr .. Supinger sta:ted that i-r. the devel.oper des1res any f1exibi1ity in his proposal.. he wi11 have to make use o£ this provision. Discussion fo11owed. Mrs_ Henning questioned whether or oo~ there was a conflict in the provisions of the proposed amendment and the existing regulations? Further discussion fo11owed .. • • • • • ( ( ~tr. ~tosbar ger asked v.hat ""'oul.d keep devel.opers Erom erecting h1gh-ri.se apartments 1n very b1ock under this proposal.? Mr. Supi.nger pointed out that th uses and density remain the same as are i.n existence un1ess the deve1op r req u sts a rezon~ng change: in other words, an apartment house cou1d not be bu1l.L in a s:t.ng1e-fami1y zone di strict even under the P1anned Devel.opment:: Distri.ct --the deve1oper would have to abide by the sing1e- 1am~1y res1..r~ct1ons. Mr. Supinger rurther pointed out that the P1anni.ng C omm1SS1on must pass approval. of every Pl.aoned Dev el.o pme nt proposal. before a Bu11d1ng Perm1t. cou1d be issued for such . Mrs . Henning noted that the 25" bu£fer str~p requ1rement, as set ~orth on Page s. is more restr~ct~ve on the P1anned Oeve1 opment District th an is presently in existence. Sh e asked if th~s wou1d app1y to properties separated by a street? Mr . Supinger s~~ted that the stree t separation wou1d e1im inate the 25 Lt . bu~fer strip~ and stated that he ant~cipated more stri n gent requireme nt s in other zone d1str1cts 1n Lhe revised zoning ordinance . ~trs. Henn~ng stated that she noLed on Page 7 that m1nimum requirements 1or open s pace are mentioned. but that such requir ments are not set ~orth in the proposed ordinan ce. She asked ~r th~s was to be 1ef't to the discret1on o~ the C ommi ss1on? Mr. Su p1n ger stated that Lhe C ommission wou1d have to decide on the minimum requ1reme nt s ror open space on each P1anned De ve1opmen t that they co n sidered. ~t:rs. Henning asked 11: the requirement-that a 1andscape p1an be prepared by a ··reg1s tered "' 1andscape architect cou1d be putting an undue burden on the deve1oper or a sma11 parce1? Mr. Supinger stated that he fe 1t the sta.f:C wou1d b e W111i n g to c ompromise on that po1nt and not require that 1t be by a ·•reg1stered"" land sca pe architect. Mrs. Henning stated tbat she would hesitate to include such a requirement in the ord i nance if it wou1d cause undue burdens. Further discussion f o llowed . Mrs. Henn1ng asked if the staf.f fe1t this proposed amendment was the £i na1 ste p i.n a Planned Develo pment Ordi.nance~ or w as it "gentl.y ea.s1ng us into a rea1 P1anned Oeve1 opment Ordinance~ which would a11ow d i.£ferent uses and dens1t1es i.n one planned development""? Mr . Supinger stated tha t be dido· t ~eel the C1ty would need anything more i n a P1anned Development O r dinance 1n the future than 1s proposed in this amendment . He pointed out that densities and uses cou~d sti 11 be changed by going throu gh a rezoning. D1scussioo £o11owed . IV . C OMPREHENSIVE Z O NING ORDINAN CE "1 1\t:Lscel.ianeous" Amendments CASE =19-71.A :August 17. 1971 3trs. Romans stated that the s taff is proposin g two changes 1n the R-3-A Zone D1str1ct~ namely the remov a1 of the restriction that a min1mum of 12 un1ts must be bu11t. and that no more than two rooms may be designed for slee p ing pu r poses in any one unit _ L\trs . Romans noted that in the R -2 -B (Two-family) Zone Di.strict~ there have been problems in that many of the o wnersh i ps a re 75 ft . frontage with one old home located thereon. It bas p r o ven ec onomica11y unfeasible to de- mo1:::t..sh or remo v e the ol.d house a nd c o nstruct a new sing1e-fami1y use or even a duplex _ on such a property. Under the p ro p osed amend~ent~ a tri -p1ex wou1d be p erm1Lted on the 75• frontage. and a four-pl.ex wou1d be p ermitted on a 100 ft . .frontage . This wou1d not be increasing the density perm i tted in the R-2 -B D1str1ct. wh1ch is 1 4 units per acre ; but~ it wou1d gi ve the p1·operty owners greater flexibility in the redevelopment o f their property. ).trs. Romans noted t;hat other amendments that have been proposed are "'h ouse- keep:Lng·· amendments; for instance ~ the parking section in the Supp1emen- taJ ~y Regula t.:::t..ons was amended to require increased of-f -street parking for res1dent1a1 uses and was fi na1 on August 13~ 1971 . However. the parking regu1at1ons were set forth separate1y in each zone district of the Ord~nance~ and chese are now p r oposed for amendment to a11eviate the possibi1ity o~ con.Cus1on . Brie£ d iscuss~on fo11owed. V . MERCHANTS PARKI G LOT 3400 Block S. Ac oma St . C ASE =20-71 ~1r . Carlson stated that C ommissio n members are in recei p t o~ a co p y of a 1ett:er from Ci ty Manager Dia1~ asking that the C o mmiss:i.on review parking -2- • 0 -I - - ( needs in the .. vicinity of the 3300 and 3400 b1ocks o£ South Broadway . •• Mr . C ar1son asked i.C the C ommission shou1d be doing research on the matter, and ho1d1ng mee1...1 n gs with ~he merchants? ).lr _ Lenl..sch stated that this matter had been considered by Ci ty C ouo.ci1, and 1 t W3S £e11... that they didn•t have enough i nformation to make a decision ~ and re £e~red the matter to the C ommission for study a nd a recommendation to C ounc1 1 . Mr . Lentsch stated that he noted the staff report recommends no actio n on Lhe pa rt o£ the City Government unti1 s uch time as the proposed ore A~ea sLudy is comp1eted, un1ess ~unds for such study are not appropri- ated i n the 1972 budget . Mr. Lentsch conunented that 1and va1.ues are not decreasing~ and he saw nothing wrong with the C ity purchasing 1and in the downtown area ror parking. He stated that he £e1t the City shou1d want to k ee p the m ercha nt....s in the downtown area in bus.Lness. Mr. Lentsch stated that he hoped the study wou1d be done~ but fe1t that some assurance shou1d be gi ven to th e downtown businessmen that the City is interested and c on- cerned . Mr . Lentsch noted that there have been discussions and meetings on the pa r k ing si tuation in downtown Eng1ewood for at 1east 10 years~ and he didn"t Cee1 the Ci ty shou1d wait to do something that is needed now: he fe1t t...hat the C1ty has waited too 1ong in the past for anything to happen. 1r . Pat r1c k qu s t:~..oned whether parking areas cou1d be secured on the east side o£ South Broadway a1so . llr . Lent sch s tated that he had met with o.f.ficia1s of the Chamber of Com - mer c e~ l\1r . Abbot...t and Mr. C urry~ and these businessmen are considering the park:~..n g prob1 m i n the downtown area . Mr. Lentsch sta"ted that he fe1t the P1ann~n g Commissi on shou1d get together with these peop1e and see if a p1an or a c tion c ou~d be dev:~..sed. ~tr . Supinger no"ted that in a pre1iminary study of the C ore Area~ it has been round that 30% of the downtown area is in pub1ic ownership--streets~ schoo1s~ uti1:~..t:~..es~ pub1ic parking . etc. He noted that this figure d:Ld not inc1ude S"ed1.sh Medica1 Center... Mr. Supinger stated that he fe1t the City shou1d use great care in spending of monies avai1ab1e. and noted that i£ the C ity purch ased the 1and it wou1d be rem oved from the tax ro11s. He commented that the C ore Area study may disc1ose that the City doesn•t need 30% or more of the downtown area in pub1ic ownership~ and may recommend 1arge parking 1ots , but not as many sma11 ones. Mr. Supinger stated that be £e1t i.t wou1d be ·•prudent to wait•• on any action on the matter. l\lr ~ Car 1son asked if a Conunittee from the Commi.ssion shou1d work with the Ch ambe r of C omme rce on the parking p rob1em? Mr. Car1son asked Mr . Supinger :~..f he had attended the meetings of the Chamber of Commerce on the parking situati on? Mr . Supinger indicated he had n o t. :\t..L. Weist asked if the C hamber of C o m.merce was ··making any rea1 e£fort on beha1.C or downtown pa rking?"" Mrs. Romans stated that the staff has w o r k ed quite c1ose1y with the Chamber on several.. occa s:~..o n s when the matter of parking bas arisen: she noted that ~he Chamber o~ C ommerce has appeared before Ci.ty Counci1 to discuss the matte~-: that: e 1t:orts to fo~ an im p rovement district to purchase property tor park~ng ha v been carried on by the Chamber of Commerce. Discussion t:o l.1owed . ~trs. Henn.:~..ng asked i£ the Merchants Parking Lot was used by customers~ or ~r i t: .:~..s used £or emp1oyee parki.ng? Mr. Lentsch stated that the l..ot isn't ··po1:J.. ed very we11··; he stated that some sta11s are rented by the business- men~ bu~ that the majority is provided for the customers . Mr . C ar1son asked i f a mode of procedure w oul..d be suggested by the Com - miss:J..on ? l\1r . Lentsch stated that be wou1d 1ike to see the C o mmission meet with the C hamber of C om.merce on this situatio n. Mr. Weist commented that he fe1t it wou1d be ••appropriate for the Chamber of Commerce to pu._sb s ome - thing on th:~..s ... ·· -3 - -• • • ( ( ~\r.Lentsch indicat.ed t.hat he had talked witb Mr._ Watson of Cindere11a City, and t.hat the Business and Occupational Tax as a means o£ financing addition- a1 C ap1ta1 Jmprovements had been discussed. He indicated that Mr. Watson te1t C 1ndere11a City merchants would approve such a tax for apita1 Improve- m ent.s . ~r-C aJ1son suggested that Mr. Supinger shou1d meet with Mr. Peterson of the C hamber oL Commerce. Mr. Weist stated that:. he felt the downtown busi- nessmen shou1d have some sort o:C c ommi.ttment .from the Chamber of Commerce and ity C ounc11 on t.he parking situation. He noted that there seems to be some sort or hesitation on the part. of City C ouncil to give such com- mittment. and he stated that he :Celt there are reservat~ons ~n the m~nds of the downtown businessmen on the sincerity of the C hamber of Co~erce to work for the downtown area. :\1rs. Henn~ng asked if the proposed Core Area Scudy had been discussed with any or the downtown businessmen? tr. Supinger ind~cated that it had been d~scussed with a few, and that no opposition to the proposa1 has been vo~ced. D:~.scuss~on fo11owed . Mrs. Henning comme nted that she dido"t see ho~ Lhe park1ng prob1em cou1d be studied apart from a consideration of the enLire downtown area . Further discussion £o11owed. Mrs. Henning asked what use the City cou1d make o~ eminent domain? Mr. Berardini stated that eminent domain is the taking o£ private property by a publ.ic authority for pub1 1c pu•·poses. He noted that util.ity companies can al.so make use of eminent doma1n. Mr. Berardini stated that uses the City m~ght make o:f th:~.s J'ftoethe>d i.s parking 1ots, gol.f courses, streets. etc. Mr. Berardi-ni stated that the City woul.d have to negotiate w~th the owner o£ the private property , and Lhen i£ such negotiations shoul.d break down, the City coul.d appe al. to the courts. Mr .. Berardini stated that the City must have a po11cy esLabl.ishing the need of the l.and p ri or to the use of eminent domain. D1scussion fo11owed. 1\.lr .. Weist stated there has been •·a traumatic change•• in Lhe downtown area in tbe l.ast four years or so. and noted that the City achn1nistrat~on ·•went out of its way to encourage the deve1opment of c~n dere11a City·•: he fe1t this wou1d be sufficient ~ustificat~on for the Cit y to make an effort to he1p the downtown businessmen . ~rr. Supinger stated that he fe1t we had to consider a "'1arger a re a than just the 3400 b1ock ""; he ~ndicaLed that he fel.t there would be proposals in the Core Area Study that wou1d be or benefit to the who1e city, and that the Comm~ssion must l.ook to this end . Further discussion :fo11owed .. Mr .. Senti stated that be ~ou1d be a11 for the c~ty"s purchase of the ].and tomorrow if he fe1t it woul.d be the c omp1ete answer to the probl.em, but he questioned 1r it woul.d so1ve anything at this time. He stated that he didn't feel. a change of ownersh1p on that particu1ar park~ng l.ot was going to bel.p the Broadway businessmen at this time . .Mr .. Lentsch stated that he d~dn' t fee1 the downtown bus~nessmen coul.d ··wait forever··. and noted that the businesses 1ocated in the downtown area do br~ng :~.n considerab1e tax money for the City. He stated that he fel.t you had to ··consider 1t an investment £or the City to kee p these businesses J.ocated :~n th downtown area.·• He discussed the ""decay•• that bas occurred in the core area, and stated that somethi n g must be done to stop such de- cay . :\.tr. Lentsch stated th a t the p roperty in question wou1d on1y 1ncrease 1n va1ue. and he stated that: he didn•t see bow it coul.d be wrong f or the C ity ~o purchase the property.. Discussion fo11owed .. :\Jr .. C ar·1son suggested that a meeting with the Conunissi.on members, Mr .. Sup:~.nger, Mr . Peterson, members of the Parking C ommittee o:f: the Chamber of ommerce and offi.cial.s of the Engl.ewood Square might be benef1cia1 . ~tr .. C ar1son stated that he woul.d try to get such a meeting set up .. VI. SUB~IISS JO OF MATERIAL FOR CO~TMISSI O N AGENDA :\lr .. Su p1nger stated that pursuant to d1rect1on from the Conuniss~on at the 1ast meecing, a po1icy for submission of requests to be inc1uded on the Comm~ss~on Agenda has been drafted by the Staff. Brief discu s sion ensued. Vobe.Jda moved: Patr1ck seconded: The :fol.l.ow:i.ng po1icy be ado p ted as submitted: -4 - • '· ~ ----~-- • 0 r 2.>< • • • • ( ""POLICY FOR SUBMITTING REQUE S TS TO THE PLA ING C O MMISSI ON In order that the City Planning and Zoning Com.missi.on me·mbers wi11 be able to g ive due consideration to each matter which comes before it. it is necessary for a person wishing to appear on the agenda o f the C ommission Lo submit their re uests a nd a11 accompan ing info rmation to the P1anning De pa rtment at 1easL t~o 2) wee s prior to the meeting at which they want their request considered. ~eetings are held on the Tuesday following th e first and third Mondays o f t:he month. (If a legal holiday falls on the .first or third Monday., the Planning Commission will meet on Wednesday night rather than Tuesday night )_ The meetings are held at 8:00 p.m. in the Counc il Ch ambers in the C ity Ha11. The applicant shou ld dis cuss his proposal with submitting his request to determine whethe r or con:Corn1ance with the Comprehensive Pl..a n and to subdivision reg ulat io ns or other requirement s, should accompany the request. the Planning staff p rior to not the proposal is in dete rmine zoning ordinance, and the in:£o:riDation which Although it is desirable for the applicant to attend the meeting to answer qu esti ons o£ the C ommiss i on and to understand the reasons for the action taken , he is not required to be present. In the event he does not attend the me eti n g , he should contact the Planning Office the following day to learn of th e C om.m ission • s action. ·• The motion carried unanimou s ly. V I I. BO L DER PLANNING C ONFERENCE September 30 & October 1 . Mr Supinger stated tbat preliminary notifi cati o n o£ the annua1 c onference Lor P1anoing O fficia ls held at the Uni vers ity of C olorado has been received. Mr. Supin g er noted that the C ommission budget for C onference and C onvention Attendance has a ba1ance of $44.40 as o f Aug ust 31, 1971 . Mr . Car l son stated that he felt the C onference as man y pe rs ons should attend as is possible. reser v otions mi g ht be shared if persons cannot is very wortbwhile~ and that He suggested that possibly attend both days . ~lr . Lentsch i ndicated he wou1d attend the Con ference for both days, as did Mrs . Henning and ~l r. Senti . Mr . Weist stated he wou1d try to attend the C onferen ce at least one day~ and Mr .. Patrick stated he would attend the C onference on September 30 . VII~. DIRECTOR·s C HO ICE Mr . Supinger stated thot c opies of the pro p o sed 1972 Budget for both the P1annin g C ommission and P1anning Department have been given the C ommission members .. Mr. Sup1nger noted that in the 1972 Bud ge t, the Planning Depart - ment ~s proposed to be combi ned with the Bui1ding Department, and will be ca1 1 ed the Department of C ommunity Oeve1opmen t. One po si t~on has been proposed in addition to present staffi n g. and that is the pos ition of Hous1ng C oord~nator~ which posit i on wi11 have charge of housing and re - deve1opment.. l\lr . Su pinger noted that he be1ieved the Wo:r kab1e Program C .1t1zens· C o~ittee is cons i dering recommending addit i ona1 persoone1 for the enLorcement oL the E nv ironmental C ode Program. Mr. Lents c h stated that he dido• t .feel that budgets were ·•fair··, and cited the times the C ommission and P1anning Department have needed to have work c o mpl eted without de1ay, and have been unable to do so because of the shortage of Lunds ror additiona1 personnel, hiring of consultants or what - ever . H e stated that h e felt the money should be requested and that it s hou1d be a pprov ed so that the many pro.,jects cou1d be accomplished. Dis- cussion fo11owed.. Mrs .. Romans s tated that the Flood P1ain Regulations wou1d be ready £or C ommission consideration very shortly, and the revised Mobil.e Hom e Pa r k Ordinan ce wi11 f o11ow the Flood Plain Regulations . -5 - • t·• • • c - - • • - • c Mr_ Car1soo sugg ested that the d~screpancy ~n trave1 pay £or the P1ann~ng C omm1ss1on members and other board members be checked into. Mr. Suping er reported on the Sign Code meeting which be. Mr .. Weist and lr .. Lents c h attended. IX. C OM.MISSION•s CHOICE Mr. Lentsch reported that City Counci1 had designated Girard Avenue from E1ati Street to Logan Street as two-way at their meeting September 7. 1971. Mr .. Lentsch discussed the Broadway/U .S .. 285 i nterchange and the 1andscaping of the open areas in the interchange .. Mr .. Lentsch stated that the State Highway Department wi11 put in the grass. but if the City of Eng1ewood wants trees and additiona1 1andscaping. it must be put in by the City. and wi11 cost SS.OOO per year to maintain it; the trees wou1d onl..y be a 4 ft . height at the time of p1anting . Mr. Lentsch noted that there are approximate1y four acres of open area to be considered. Mr. Lentsch noted that a sprinkl..ing system wil..l.. be insta11ed, but the City of Eng1ewood wil..l.. furnish the water, which wi11 amount to approximate1y Sl...SOO. Discussion fol..l..owed . Mr. M.osbarger commented that be fel..t the greenery woul..d be better c ared fo r ~f tbe City assumed the respons~bil..ity . Discussion fo l..l..owed. Mr. Lentsch stated that he fe l..t this coul..d be a very attractive area. and wou1d aid the downtown area revital..ization . Kr. Lentsch stated that C ouncil.. approved an Ordinance restricting parking within 20 ft . of an intersecti on, and al..s o approved an Ordinance prohibiting trash cans in the al..l..ey right-of-way. 1t was moved and seconded that the meeting be adjourned. carried; the meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m • -6- .- The motion II • • r 32xiC • • • • • - TO: Honorab1e Mayor and City Counci1 via Stan1ey H. Dia1, City Manager FROM: City P1anning & Zoning Commission O F FI CI AL cny CO UN~I D OCU M~ • > C:ou ~~'-•L G f LE:- CIT"'w' C>F E ......_GL ~ L-. CO!::t:l. SUBJECT: Proposed A11ey Vacation -B1ock 79, Sheridan Heights Subdivision (Former1y Site of Scenic View E1ementary Schoo1) The City P1anning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting September 21, 1971, voted 8 -0 to recommend approva1 of the request of Wi11iam K. Ma1one, on beha1f of Schoo1 District No. 1, for the vacation of the a11ey in B1ock 70, Sheridan Heights Subdivision , f or the fo11owing reasons: 1. The a11ey requested -to be vacated 1ies entire1y within the City of Eng1ewood. and has no common boundary with any oth er po1itica1 subdivision. 2. The 1and cou1d more easi1y be deve1oped in the I-2 Zone as an entire b1ock if it were not divided by an a11ey. 3. I f vacated, no 1and wou1d be 1eft without access to a dedicated pub1ic way. 4. No uti1ities are now in p1ace which wou1d need such a right-of-way. Respectfu11y submitted, AMES L . Director o f P1anning on beha1f of City P1ann i n g & Zoning Commission gw enc1: Staff Report Area Map Excerpt of Minutes dated 9-2~-71. Letter requesting vacation. date 8-25-71 cc: Mr. Ma1one Mr. Kramer Mr . Berardini September 28. 1971 • \ ! ~ • • I' • • STAFF REPORT Page -1- Date to be C onsidered: September 21 , 1971 App1icant: • 0 ... ALLEY VACATI ON CASE ~21-71 Wi11iam K. Ma1one, on beha1f o£ Schoo1 District o. 1, Arapahoe County, Co1orado. Property O wner: Schoo1 District No. 1, Arapahoe C ounty, Co1orado~ 4101 South Bannock Street, Eng1ewood, Co1orado. L ega1 Description: An a11ey in B1ock 79, Sheridan Heights, Arapahoe County, Co1orado. Location: A b1ock in the I -2 Zone District of Northwest Eng1ewood between South Raritan and South Pecos Streets, bounded on the north by the Eng1ewood C~ty L~mits. and on the south by West Ba1tic P1ace . This is the 1ocation of the o1d Scen~c View Schoo1. Description o£ Request: To vacate the dedica~ed a11ey in this B1ock in order that the 1and can be so1d and deve1oped as one unit rather than as ~wo parce1s divided by the a11ey-way. Recommended Action: That the City P1anning and Zoning Commission recommend to the City C ounci1 that the request to vacate the a11ey in said B1ock 79. Sheridan Heights. be approved for the f o11owing reasons : 1. The a11ey requested to be vacated 1ies entire1y within the City of Eng1ewood, and has no common boundary with any other po1itica1 subdivision • 2. The 1and cou1d more easi1y be deve1oped in the I -2 Z o ne as an entire b1ock if it were not divided by an a11ey. 3. I£ vacated, no 1and wou1d be 1eft without access to a dedicated pub1ic way. • 0 • • • STAFF REPORT Page -2- • 0 - ALLEY VACATION Case #21-71 4 . No uti1ities are now in p1ace which wou1d need such a right-of -way. Background : Unti1. this year, this b1ock was occupied by the Scenic View E1ementary Schoo1. A new schoo1 has been constructed at 2323 West Baker Avenue and is being used at this time. The Schoo1 Board has no further use for the origina1 bui1dings and wou1.d 1ike to dispose of the site. The bui1.dings and 1and are in the I -2, Heavy Industria1 Zone District of Eng1.ewood, and can be more easi1y so1.d by the Schoo1 District for industria1 deve1opment if the a11ey were vacated. The a1.1ey vacation wo u1d p1ace fewer restrictions on the future deve1oper of the property. At the present time. some of the buil.dings are l.ocated over the al.l.ey. Depar~mental. and Agency C omment s: Util.ities De part.ment: ''The uti1ities as lar as th1s Department reason to use it at a future date . no interest in it as an al.l.ey ... subject a11ey is concerned. Therefore • we contains no We see no woul.d have Public Works Department: ••we have no objection to the vacation o:£ the ailey In Block 7 9 . Sheridan Hei ghts Subdivision.•• be no no C ompany to "'t:his ·•p1.ease rv ce Company has ~:1 !~ ~:~vt~~e;0 ~ha~S!sG:i i~~~is;~n~av~~~l.~~j:~~~~~= vacation. ·• Mountain Bel.l. Tel.ephone Com p any: .. Mountain Bel.l. has no pl.ant In the area to be vacated and therefore no objection.·· Pl.anning Departm e nt Anal.ysis: Vacation of this a11ey woul.d not affect the existing util.ity service to the site which has access to the property from publ.ic right-of-way. nor woul.d it prevent future instal.l.a- tion of util.ities to serve the site. The vacation woul.d pl.ace fewer restrictions on the existing bui1dings and upon the l.and for future devel.opment within the I -2 Zone District. Therefore. the Pl.anning Department recommends approval. of this request • • • • • 0 - VACATION W ARR E. ::. 7 w . BALT IC AVE. I-.- w . ILIFF AVE . ~ ., • ::z =I 1--., ..... '·-~ ... "" a: :z -o a: z ~;- o...J t- <I) • v> • REQUEST E NS AV'E ENGLEWOOD PLANN I NG DEPART MENT CITV OF ENGLEWOOD . COLORADO SCALE · g CI TY OF ";<-.'T £G.d • 100 200 BY 9-14 -71 DENVER I-2 78 I 500 I lcr UJ ::> ~~a C> = C> 3: u.o -' <.:> • • ~I I I' • • • C ITY OF E NGLEW<X>D PLANNING AND ZONING C OMh-'IISSION SEPTEMBER 21. 1971 I . CA LL TO ORDER. The R eg u13r m ee ting of t h e Ci ty P1anning and Zoning Commission was ca11ed t o o rde r a t 8:00 p.m. b y C ha i rman C ar1son. M e m bers p rese n t : Patri c k ; Sent i ; VobeJda ; Wei s t ; Car1son; Henning ; L e nt sch ; Mosbarger Sup i n ge r~ Ex-of ficio Members a bse nt: Barton A 1so present : A ssis tant P1anning Director Romans Cit y Atto rney Berardini Mess r s . E as on, Kramer,. Dransfe1dt II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES. Mr. C ar1son state d that the Minutes of September 8,. 1971 7 were to be c onsid e red f or approva1. Lents c h mov e d : Henn i n g second e d : The Minutes o f September 8,. 1971,. be approved as wr.i..tten. Th e mot i on c arr ied unanimous1y. I I I . ALLE Y VAC ATIO CASE "'21-71 Bioc k 79,. She r1dan Heights M r. Sup i.n g er s ta't:.e d tha't:. the va c at:ion o.f the al.l.ey in Bl.ock 79. Sheridan H e i g hts Subdivi s ion. has been requested by School. District #1. This is t:h e site o~ the ol.d S c enic View School., and is no 1onger in use by the School. District. Mr . Supinger stated that the staff has checked the reque s t out with t:he Uti1ity C ompanies and C ity Departments. and no ob- ~ec tion to the request ha s been voiced. Mr. C ar1son asked Alr . E as on or Mr. Kramer if they wished to make a presentation. Mr. Eason stated that be was appearing for tbe app1icant. S c hool. Di s trict F1. and that amended surveys of the sub~ect bl.ock have been pl.aced before the Commission. Mr. Eason noted that the bui1dings in this b1ock were compl.eted in the 1930's or 1940's. There aie no util.ities in this a11ey. nor has the a11ey ever been in pl.ace in the b1oc k or used as an a11ey. &lr. Eason noted that with the opening of the new Scenic View School. at 2323 West Baker Avenue, this property (B1ock 79, Sheridan Heights) bec~e "su..rp1u.s" property. and it is the po1icy of the School. Board to dispose of such surp1us property at the e arl.ies t pos sib1e moment . Mr. Eason stated that the property wi11 be ea s i e r to se11 ir the a11ey is vacated. and can be sol.d as one parcel.. Mr. Eason noted t hat the requested vacation wil.1 not l.eave any property i n t his bl.ock w i thout access to a dedicated street. Mrs . Henning asked i.L the property woul.d be put: up for sal.e by the School. Board ? Mr . Kram e r s tate d that the property woul.d be p1aced on the open ma r k e t a s s oon a s the vacation has been approved. and as soon as the S c hoo1 Board ha s record o f the a11ey vacation . Lentsch moved: Mosbarger s econded : The Pl.anning Commission recommend to City Council. that the al.1ey in B1ock 79. Sheridan Heights Sub- d i v is ion b e vacated; the fo11owing reasons ~ustifying said vacation: 1 . The a11e y requested to be vacated 1ies entire1y within the City of Eng1ewood. and has no co~on boundary with any other po1itica1 subdivision. -1 - • • - • • • 2. The 1and cou1d more easi1y be deve1oped in the I-2 Zone as an entire b1ock i£ it were not divided by an a11ey. 3. I£ va cated . no 1and wou1d be 1 eft without access to pub1i..c way. dedicated 4. No uti1 ities are now i n p1a ce which wou1d need such righ t-o:f -way. The motion carried unanimous1y. IV. EASEl\lENT VACATION CASE #22-71 Lot 3. Snowbarge r Sub. Mr. Supinger stated that this matter was referred to the P1anning Com- mission by the City C ounci 1 at their meeting on September 20. 1971. with the re ques t that the C ommission consider the matte r at their next meeting. if possib1c. Mr . Supinger s tated that on the south side o:f Lot 3. Snowbarge r Subdivision . there is an S ~oot uti1ity easement. As ~ar as can be determined by th e st aff, there are no uti1ities situated in this particu1a r e as eme nt. However. there is a 10 :C oot easement for a 12 '• water 1ine which ang1es across the S foot easement in a southeaster1y direction. Mr . Supinger noted that this 10 f oot easeme nt f or the water 1ine wou1d have to be exc1uded if the vacation of the 8 f oot easement were recommended to City Counci1. Mr. Supinger stated there is a sing1e- mm11y home on the property at the present time, and there is a1so the Loundation and ~1oor oL the pre vious garage on the property.. Mr. Supinger stated that Mr .. Drans:Ce1dt. the property owne r . has indicated be wishes to use this existing fou ndat ion and f1 oor :Cor the new garage be wants to bui1d . lr. Drans:Ce1dt s tated that when be made app1ication £or a Bui1ding Per- m1t to bui1d the g arage, he was info rmed that be did not have the proper :C ront set ba c k in the 1ocation he bad proposed, and that he cou1d not move the garag south without encroa chi ng on the 8 ft . easement . He stated that the topography of the 1and is such that be cou1d not move the bui1ding to the west. Discussion £o11owe d.. Mr. Mo s barger asked if the property wou1d remain under one ownership, or i:C Mr . Drans fe1dt p1anned to sp1it the ownership? Mr . Drans .fe 1dt st ated that it wou1d be one parce1. Mrs. Henning asked what proce dure had been fo 11owed in other instances where a cu1-de -sac wou1d n ecess ari1y i nter fere with proper set-backs on a parce1 of 1and. Discussion fo11owed . &~s . Henning asked if possib1y this situation shou1d '•be corrected fr om the other end .. rather than vacating an ease - ment.. Sbe asked 1£ it wou1d be possib1e to obtain a variance on such a maTter? Mr. Supinger stated that he fe1t this particu1ar si tuat i on was "'tai1or made :Cor a v:::..riance... Mrs. Henning asked Mr. Dransfe1dt i :f he had requested a var i ance? Mr. Dransfe1dt s tat ed he had not asked for a var iance. and s~ated he wou1d prefer to have the easement vacated, which wou1d enab1e him to move t h e gar a ge to within three feet o f the property 1ine. Further brief discussion fo11owed .. Hennin g-moved: Lents c h seco nd ed: The P1anning Comm ission recommend to City Counci1 the 8 f oot uti1ity easement on the south side of Lot 3, Snowbarger Subdi vi sion be vacated, the 1ega1 description of said recommended vacat1on as :fo11ows: ·•conunencing at the southwest cor ner of Lot 3 • SNOWBARGER SUBDIVISION, 1yin ~ i n the SE-1 /4 SE-1/4 of Sectio n 4, TSS, R68W; thence east a1ong the south 1ine of s aid Lot 3, 8.0 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north and para11e1 to the west 1ine of said Lot 3, 8.0 feet; the n ce east and para11e1 to the sou th 1ine of Lot 3, 182 .. 0 feet ; thence south and para11e1 to the e ast 1ine of Lot 3. 8.0 feet to a point on the south 1ine of Lot 3; thence west a1ong the south 1ine of Lot 3, 182.0 feet to the true point of beginning. This vacation does not inc1ude the water 1ine e a sement as recorded in Book 924, Pa ges 207-209 and 211 of Arapahoe Cou nty Records . •• The motion c arried unanimous1y. -2- • • • • • MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOM- MENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE : September 21. 1971 SUBJECT : A11ey Vacat~on. B1ock 79. Sheridan Heights RECOMMENDATION: • The P1anning Commission recommend to City Counci1 that the a11ey in B1ock 79. Sheridan Heights Subdivision. be vacated ; the fo11owing reasons ~ustifying said vacation : 1. The a11ey requested to be vacated 1ies entire1y within the City of Eng1ewood. and h a s no common boundary with any other po1itica1 subdivision. 2. The 1and cou1d more easi1y be deve1oped in the I-2 Zone as an entire b1ock if it were not divided by an a11ey. 3. If vacated. no 1and wou1d be 1eft without access to a dedicated pub1ic way. 4. No uti1ities are now in p1ace which wou1d need such a right-of-way. Respectfu11y submitted . B y Ord er of the City P1anning and Zoning Commission G ~ .. W TY Recording Secretary -8 - • • • '32x - • • • N ARAPAHOE SU R VEYS UA \. 00 L .... IC H OI_O.... -'"~'.,.....,-' ..,,c ,ocr '- qL C:.·•~f LI~E ("~ ~ . ._. .. "II':"' OH~ s.u ~, L..,~ """""' \.V O t;;.K k a. I -ll....ET.._-,...._ O::..< .. U ... Oh..-..L.""U -O o ~:.-~ .. -. 1 /2'' S TI:C.L P I r_;:;. t 0 • ... --·-..... __ LA-O F rO C.If:~ SJMOS .. E A sos .. J-I o ~-r & ~1A LO~•~ E~OLCWCJoOD, Go~N'"-DO 001 10 ,.,c ... ,..FOt o ... ~, .. o.,. fltOC.., ..... g ~ ~ .. SON ... , .. ._ ... ov.- _,.._.._, ...... " .... LON.:: August 25, 1971 • Planning Department City of Englewood 3400 South Elati Englewood, Colorado SO 11.0 Attention Dorothy Romans G e ntlemen: Re: Petit.ton for Ordinance VacatlnQ )!\.lley lying in Block 79, Sheridan Heights, Arapahoe county, Colorado On behalf of our clients , School Distrtct No. 1, Arapahoe County, Colorado., plea se consider this l etter t .o be a request: and petltl<>n to ·vacate the alley as above describe d and as shown on the cop y of attached survey. School District No. 1 is the owner of all of the lots in said Block 79 and t he Old Sce nic Vi e w School buildings are built on the a l ley . Prt.or to the t ime that this petition appears on y our agenda , I hope t o be abl e to furn.ish y ou with a site p l an showing t he l ocation of t he b u ildings in r e l a t ion 't.O t he alley. Th e alley r equest ed to be vacated lies entirely within the City of Engle wood., it is not. a boundary wi.t.h any othe r political sul:x:livision, and if v acated ""ou ld not l eave any land without access to a dedicated public way_ We wou ld appreciate v ery much your recommendation to the City Council [or th e City of Englewood recommending the vacating of the alle y wi:thout r eservation as to any rights of way for utilities except as may b e actua lly now in place _ Of course , any utility casements now install ed must b e protect e d _ WKM/pn Thank. you for your many courtesies and consideration_ V ery t .ruly yours, .c.:~. ,-,r;.,.----~ //<'-<<-:::::,~~ W illiam K . Ma l one • l i i • • \ \ I' 32X - - - - - 0 - -... .... -orr•c.e::s SJNON, E A s<>.s,. Jlo-...---r & !'-lALO::•n::: f"ICMARO .... SI .... O N Ao C.-AA"O .._ .:a SON Planning Department City of Englewood 3400 South Elati August 25 , 1971 Englewood , Colorado SO 110 Att ention Dorothy Romans G e ntlemen: Re: P e tition for Ordinance V acating Mley lying i.n Block 7 9. Sheridan Heights. Arapahoe County . Colorado On b e half of our clients 1 School District No . 1, Arapahoe County 1 Colorado. please consider thi s l e tter t .o b e a request and petition to ·vacate the alley as above describe d and as shown on the copy of attached surve y .. School District No . 1 i s the owner of all of the lots in said Block 79 and the Old Scenic Vi e w School buildings are built on the alle y.. Prior to the time that thi s p e tition appears on your agenda. I hope to be able to funtish you wi.t:h a site plan shovving th e location of the buildings in relation to the alley . The alley requ ested to be v acated lies entirely within th e City of Eng l e wood~ it is not a bounda ry with any other political subdivision, and if v acated would not leave any land without access to a d edica t ed public way. W e would appreciat e very much you r recommendation to the City Council for the City of Engl ewood recommending the vacating of the all e y wi.thout r eservation as to any rights of way for utilities except as may b e actua lly now in place . Of cours e , any utility casements now install e d must be protect ed . WKM/pn Tha nk you for your many courtes i es and consideration .. Very truly you rs 1 £L--"<< £'<';~.·---~ /.7<'-cC.::'L~ William K. Malone • \ ! ~ -- [ • • -•o.J tt"".l _, .. ,,.::::.:o· ._ 1 /2•• S TCCL Pr :::;. WITH PLI\::..T JC. C APS AT L LO C~ Co rt;JC.OS - N S.C43 SOUTH Pr~tNC.i::. A R A !':_~"'~-s~ ~ ~~,7:,;;: E Y S ~ su~.:-.L'IS. IVA' '\VOR.o< 1_1 ., rLt::"'1.._">..._ C...UL.Qf...-AU(..J. 1 · O o ~-~ ·;·, VV: VVARR..E/V AVE.· ~ r.rlllllll iTITI "IliTTilTTl ~ I ~ SJJ I.Iilli1J11JIJ11JUJ::l i - YY: L3 A L T/C PL. I ffCnC:DV OERT I FY Till::; TO DE A T RUC A.t!D h ..COURA TE PLAT CF LOT 1 Tllr.:U 46. 0LOC:-;. 7 9 . ~uE.n l c U l-iE J OH T S A. SU&DI\.C.I!;OION l tJ TJ.:E Cr-cv CF EflCLCl:...-:;)O::J • COLC"'Rr.o o AriD THA.T I ll4VE Til I S DAY LOCNT &:O THE POIUTS A.S Slt0\~:1 HCREOHo AUO\."C. DC::..C R I Ot:.O TnACT COI~-::'A IUS 1 t14 ~20;,>.,.75 liQ.UJIIt.RE Fc.cT 07 L J'..J.=O e .:. 77~-cl'lr o6 /l(:.c• -e A'.~ i'cc I~Tt:...f!ED L hrlo Sunvcvo:t A.ucu:;T 2:;._ '1 97"! . ' . --• • • • TO: FROM : • 0 - Honorab1e Mayor and City Counci1 via Stan1ey H. Dia1, City Manager City P1anning & zoning Commission .. OFFICIAL: CrT'Yi COUNCIL DOCUMENT pr--....., •• --""> ' 1 C Cu LE ClTY O F t::r-... G . ::-oLO. SUBJECT: Proposed Easement Vacation -Snowbarger Subdivision (4100 B1ock, South Huron Court) Tbe City P1anning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting September 21, 1971, voted 8 -0 to recommend approva1 of the request of Mr. Ivan Dransfe1dt for vacation of an eight (8) foot uti1ity easement at the so-uth end of the Snowbarger Sub- division, as per the fo11 owing description: ''Commencing at tbe southwest cor·ner of Lot 3 , SNOWBARGER SUB- DIVISION, 1ying in the SE-1/4 SE-1/4 of Section 4, TSS, R68W; thence east a1ong the south 1ine of said Lot 3, 8.0 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north and para11e1 to the west 1ine of said Lot 3. 8.0 feet ; thence east and para11e1 to the south 1ine of Lot 3, 182.0 £eet; thence south and para11e1 to the east 1ine of Lot 3, 8.0 feet to a point on the south 1ine of Lot 3; thence west a1ong the south 1ine of Lot 3, 182.0 feet to the true point of beginning. This vacation does not inc1ude the water 1ine easement as recorded in Book 924. Pages 207-209 and 211 of Arapahoe County Records. 9 • a=:~~ ~~!:~.,_~· SUPINGER Director of P1anning on beha1f of City P1anning & zoning Commission gw enc1 : Staf f Report Area Map Minutes of Septe~ber 21, 1971 cc: Mr. Oransfe1dt City Attorney Berardini September 29. 1971 • • • I' 32X [ • • • STJ\F1.-RLPOH"l"" P~~c -1- • 0 - EASEMENT VACATION CASE #22-71 St.a1."1." R cpor1.. n c : Reque s -t. t..o vncat..c an easement. in t.he Snowbar~er Sub- di_visi.on. Da~e ~o b e Con si d cre~: R e:Cerrccl t..o t.h e P1anning: Commis sion by t.be Ci.."t.y Counci.1. N:::\mC of' Propert..y O wne r s : ~van R . and Doris P. Drans:Cc1dt.. Address : 4150 so-..tt.h Huron. Court. Eng1ewood . Co1orRdo. 80110 Zone Dist.l.-ict: R-1-C (Sing 1c-:Cnmi ly Residcnt.i..nl) Dc ~cri.pt..iot~ o£ R eques t.: To vacate a port.ion o~ nn easement. on t.he south side o:C Lot 3~ Snowbargcr Subdivi.sion ~ in order that the ov:ne~-s can const..ruct. a garage which wi.l.1 ext.cnd into t..he casement .. Descrj ption of" Subject. Site and Area: The Sno, .. •bargcr Subdivision. is 1ocatcd on the south side o£ \'icst O x£o:rd A'\!e nuc and inune dia.1..c1y west.. o:C t..hc City Ditch. Because or t..l~c Dit..ch and the topography ~n this area~ it has b een nece ssary ~o prov~de access ~o the 1ots ~n the sub- divi sion r~om a cu1-de-sac~ a short st..rcc 1.. having one end open o~~ o~ ~he sou~h s~de o~ wes~ Ox~ord Avenue and te~n~nat ed at t..h e o~h c r end by a vcl~icu1ar t..u~n-a round. BecRu Re ~he cu1-de-sac pro~rudes ~n~o ~h e Dransre1d~ proper~y and ~h e 1nn~ slopes ~o the sou~hwes~. ~h e u se o~ the 1o~ ~s 1imit..c d. In addit.i..on~ t..h crc is an S ~oo1.. u1..i1i1..y easement. on t..h e ca s t.~ west. nnd sou1..h siclcs o1." t.hc Subdivision~ and a 10 :t"oot.. cnscmcnt.. J'"or a wnt..cr 1ine ""•hi.ch bi sec ts the Drans:Cc1dt.. 101..~ which :fu1.·t.her j _n.trudc i.nt.o t..h c u snbj Jit..y or t.h c p.ropc1:t..y. 'Thc1..·c n1 ·c no ut.i1i.t.ics in t.hc sou t.h cn.scmcnL except. at t..l1c poi.H1.. where t.hc ·wa t..cr 1i.nc cnRcmcn1.. crosses it .. • • • T 32X • - - STAFF REPORT' Pnr~c -2- - • - EASEMENT VACATION Case #22-71 There is a singlc-LruniJy hou se on t..hc cast side o:C t..hc Dran s Lc1dt. propcr t..y. There is al..so t..hc :rl..oor and :Coun<.lation :£rot1t a cindcrl>l..oc l <. chi.ckcnhou s c, upon '"•hich Mr. Orans:Ccl..dt.. pl..an s t..o con s t..ruc~ a :Crnrnc garage . The area is cl c vcl..opcd wit..h singl..c-:C:::uni.ly homes . Back -round or Prev~ou s Ac~ion Re1atinR to the Proper t On S ~pt.cmbcr JG, 1971, :..1r. Drans:Ccl..dt. app1i.cd :Cor pc1-mi.t. t.o con s t.ru c t.. a :Crume garage on hi.S propcrt..y, u1..i.l..i.zi.n g -t.hc 1:1oor and :f"oot...:i.ngs J:"roru t._hc ci.nderbl.ock st.ruct..urc . This c.indcrl>locl;: buildinG hnd been. a chicken house ori.gi.na 11y, and it was t..h en. convcrt.cd t..o a gnragc. When t,he bui.1d:i.n.g be ga n t..o d ct.cri.oJ·a~c ... lr. Dran s :Cc1dt. decided t..o t.akc t.hc wa11s and roof: out. and t.o buil.d a :Cra1nc garage on the o1d :Coundati.ons and :C1oor. When he app1:ied :Cor t.h.c Pcrmi.t.., he was to1d 1..h a t.. he had a 19 J:"oot. rat.hcr t.han t.he required 25 foot :Cront. set..- back and ~hat.. t.ltc appl..icat..iott :Cor t.hc Permit coul.d not. be approv ed by 1..1tc P1anning Depart.mcnt.. He considered extending t.hc.gnr agc ~<> t.lt c sou Lll, and he was ~nrormcd that 11c _coul.d no~ 1o~aLc t..he garag:e in t..h e S :Coot uLili ty easement . At.. thj s point.., apparcntl..y, ~tr . Dransfcl..dt discussed the matt..c1· wjt..h Cit..y Manager Dial.. and Mr . Dial.. re:Ccrred the matt..er t..o t..he City Cou11ci1 ~1.. t..hcir meeting on September 20, 1971 . ~r . Djn1 recrnrune ndod to the Counci1 that the matter shau1d be ~'e:Ce.rred ~o t.hc Pl.anni.ng Co1.uniss :i..on. :Cor a reconuncn.clat..:i...on and the Counc~1 d~d so---request~ng that ~~ poss~b1e . ~t be con- sidered at.. tl1e meeting on September 21, 1 971 . Conunent..s f:rom Ot..h er Departmc11t..s: Direct..or o:C Ut..i1~~~es Ch~rl..es Carro1l.. hn:= 3tatcd ~hat he h as no ob,ject..iOl"l 1.o t..h e vacat..~on o"£ ~he casement on 1.h e sout..h s~dc o£ J ~o~ 3, Snowbarge r Subd~vis~on, ~£ the easement £or the water 1inc is re1..ai.ned. This is a 12 inch reeder ]._inc and it cannot. be ~ntrLtdcd upon. D~r ector o~ Pub1~c Works Ke11 s Wa~goncr has no object~on ~o the requested vacat~on ~~ tho onsemont ~or ~he water 1~ne i.s rct..nin.cd. It wa s not. poss~b1c to get.. a rep1y ~rom Mo,1n.tain Bel) and t..h c Pub) ic Service Company ovcl-1.he phone. The record s in t..h.c P1ann.i.n e Ocpart.mcnt :Ci1c s , however, reveal.. t..l1aL ~here is no elcc1.l·ic, gas, or 1..c1cphone service in t...hi.s easement.. R C ];1.1..iou s hip 1.0 ~he Comprehensive Plan: Th~s reque s t wou1d not be con~rar~ ~o ~~c prov~R~on s o~ 1.hc r~cnCl":l l plnn o:C t..hc Ci.t..·y . • • • \ . ~ r 32x • • 0 - ST'AF1.., HEPOR'T EASE~lENT VACATION Page -3-Case ~22-7) \\1'l cn t-h e Cit..y required a cul-de-sac wit.h a 90 1"oot.. di.nmc t.cr and an S f"oot ut..ili.t.y eascmc-••, on. t-hree s:idcs o1 t.hc Sno·wbara;:cr Su bdivision . t..wo 1ot..s were ndv~~scl.y a££cct..ed : one a£ t..h csc i.s t.l ~c nrans£c1dt. propcrt.y . To 1ocnt..c t..l~c garage £urt..h cr t..o ~h e wes~ wou1d be vary cxpenR~vc because or ~h e s1opc or ~h e 1 and a ... vay "£1·ont 1.hc cul.-dc-sac and t.hc on1y 1og;i.ca.l. ·wny to con s~ruc~ a ~wo-cnr gnrnge on ~h e ~~c •ou1d appear to be ~o int..rudc i .n1..o t..h c S f'oot casement.. on. t.ll c sout..h. o:f' the l.ot... The Zoning Orditlancc now requires t_wo o££-st..rcct.. parkin g spaces £or n ew si.ng;l.c-f'atnil.y homes, and i.r Mr . Drnn s rcl.dt cat~ cons1..1"L1ct.. 1..ltc garage as he pl.at~. h e wi.11 b e in com pl.i.ancc wit..ll t..l1 c int..cn t.. o£ t..h c Ordi.n attcc , even ~hou gh ~he hou se ~s an ex.~st.i-n g one . From t.hc i.n£o1•nat.ion t.h nt. is ava~1n.b1c . there appears t..o b e no u sc ~or t.hc S £cot casemcn~ on t..hc sout..h side o£ t..l1 c Snowbarccr Subdi.vi.~i.on . wi.t..h t..l,e cxcopt.~on o£ t.l1c port.ion o£ that.. c:ascmcn~ across which i.s cx~cnc.lcd t.hc 10 £cot ensCJ•lent. ~or ~h e wnt.cr 1i-nc . T he o wne rs o£ t.l1~s particular l.ot are con£ront.cd w~t.ll many problems not. o£ t.l1 eir making ~ and i.£ vn cat..ing porti-OJl S o£ t..l,i.s unu se d casemc1,t w~11 enab1c them to i mprove t.hcil· prop cl~t.y by cons t.ruct:i n ~ ::\ two-c ::\r garage on it~ t..h e vn cnt..ion '"·oul.d appear t.o b e jus t.ificd. The house was bui.11.. in or prior t..o 1.948~ and t..l1 c 1and was subdivided ~n 1.9 58; it. is un £ort..~1n at..e that ~hi s si.t..u a t..i.on wa s creat..cd at th e ~i.mc o £ s ubdivision . R ccorruncndnt..ion o:f' 1:h<: -"1anni.n{{ Dcpart.men~: The P1:anning Dcpnr~mcnt J:'i.nd s t..hat. there .J..S no public purpo se t.o be served by ~he rct..cnt..ion o£ tl1 c £o11o win~ de scr ibed u""...:il.:it..y ea~cment.. and r commends 1..ha"'L i~ be v acated : ••comme ncing at. t..he sout.hwcst cornCr o:r Lot 3. S NOWDARGER SUBD~VISION. 1y~n g ~n th e SE-1/4 S E-1/~ o~ Section 4. TSS . RGSW; thence east R1o ng ~h e souLh 1~n e o f sa~d Lo~ 3, S .O f ee~ t.o t.l1 c t..ru c point o£ be g i.nn.in c:-; t.h c n ce north and p~ra11c1 ~o ~he wcs~ l.~ne o£ sai.d Lot. 3, S.O ~cct.; ~~~C tl Ce cast. and parn11cJ to th e ~outh l._jnc o~ Lo1.. 3, J S2 .0 ::Ccct.; t..h cn.cc sout.h and p arn Jl c1 to 1..hc cnst.. 1i.nc o£ L ot 3, C.O f:cct. to n. p oint. on. t.h c sou1...h 1jnc o:r LOt. 3; t.h C"nc.c wC"st.. a1on g t..h c _ou1..h 1 i.nc o:r Lot 3. 1 82 .0 :r ee L t.o t.h c 1..ruc poin1.. o£ b c~i nni.n g . 'l'h j s vaca t.ion. docs no~ inc J \.lclc t.h c wa 1.cr .1inc cascmcn L a s recorded i.n Dool-:.: 92.-j . Pa t~cs 20 .. /-209 and 21~1 o::C A J..·:'pnllo c Coun.t.r rccoi-ds. •• • ., • • r - - N t Plonf'tene D e p o rtment Cit-, ~ E n e le.,.ood C o lor octo S cole:. A ~···,.20o" $-21-71 - • w . OXFORD - 0 - , e w U INCY • I' ---------------- • • • • 0 .. - TO: Engle·wood Planning and Zoning Con"''n'lission FROl\'1: l\1"r . Stanley ll. Dial. Cit."Y l\1ana.gcr DATE:· Scpt.crnhcr 21,. 1971 SUBJECT' REFEHRAL OF HEQUEST FOR UTILITY EASEJ\IENT VACA .. riON-SNO'\\'B.'UIGEH SUBDIVlSION. 4100 BLOCK SOU'£H J-TU UON COURT The Cit.").• Council received a request f ron"l. l\1-r. Iv an Drnus£eldt Ior the v acation of a.--e.• utilit.y easen"lcnt in th e Sno,vbargcr Subdivi.sion at. U.s 1nceting on S cpt.crnbcr 20Uli . ~"'11.c Council has 1-~eferl.:C.d the request. to th e Cotntniss ion ~o ·r its consideration. n.ud recon"\_n"''endat.ion . Because of l\1r . Dransfc ldt."s dcsi1.7C t.o cornrnencc constl...-uct..ion on a garage. "'Which 'vould be affected by the casement. at Ute earliest possibl e dn.t.e,. the Council 1·c.quest.s th;::a._t t .h.is matter be considered at your n"''cct.ing On Septctnber 21st,. if pOssible,. so that a report "'-ill be avaUablc Ior Ulc Cot.mcil rncet.ing of October 4.,. 1971. Respectfully subn:tit.-t.ed,. STANLEY II. DIAL Cit.y l\ot.anage1-~ SHD/ij • . , , ·I \I I ! \ ! ~ • • r 32xl • • ---- • SEPTEMBER 21, 1971 2. The 1and cou1d more e asi1y be deve1oped in the I-2 Zone as an entire b1ock i£ it were not divided by an a11ey. 3. Ir va cated, no 1and wou1d be le ft without access to a dedicated pub1i.c w ay. 4-o utilities are now i n p1ace which would need such right-o:f-way. The motion carried unanimous1y . IV. EASEME T VACATION CASE #22-71 Lot 3, Snowbarger Sub. Mr. Supinger stated that this matter was referred to the Planning Com- mission by the Ci ty C ouncil at their meeting on September 20 7 1971 7 with the request that tbe C on:unission consider t:he matter at their next meeting, 1£ poss1ble . Mr. Supinger stated that on the south side of Lot 3 7 Sno~barger Subdivision, there is an S :foot utility easement. As far as can b determined by th e staff , there are no utilities situated in this particular easement. However, there is a 10 foot easement for a 12•• water line which angles across the S foot easement in a southeasterly direction. Mr . Supinger noted that this 10 root easement for the water line would have to be excluded if the vacation of the S foot: easement were ~eco~ended to City Council. Mr. Supinger stated there is a siog1e - Wmi1y hom e on the property at the present time, and there is a1so the roundation and floor o:f the previous garage on the property. Mr. Supinger stated that Mr. Drans£e1dt, the property owner, has ~nd~cated he w~shes to use thi s existing £oundation and f1oor for the new garage he wants to build. Mr . Drans .re1dt stated that when he made application for a Bui1ding Per- mit to build the garage, he was ~n£ormed that he did not have the proper Crout se tback in the location he had proposed, and that be could not move the garage south ~ithout encroaching on the S ft. easement. He stated that the topography or tbe 1and is such that he could not move the building to th e west. Discu ssion £o11owed.. Mr. Mosbarger asked if the property wou1d remain und er one o~nership, or if Alr. Dransfe1dt planned to sp1it the ownership? Mr. Drans.fe1dt sta ted that it wou1d be one parce1. Mrs. Henning asked what procedure had been fo11owed in other instances where a cu1-de -sac would necessarily inter.fere w~th proper set-backs on. a parcel of 1and. Oiscuss~on .fo11owed . Mrs. Henning asked if possib1y this s~tuation shou1d .. be c orrec t e d -crom the other end .. rather than vacat~ng an ease- ment. Sbe asked 1r it wou1d be possible to obtain a variance on such a matter? Mr. Sup1nger stated that he fe1t this particu1ar situation was ··tai1or made .for a variance··. Mrs. Henning asked Mr. Dransfe1dt :l.f he had requested a var i ance? M.r. Oransfeldt stated he had not asked for a varianc e , and stated he wou1d prefer to have the easement vacated, whi c h wou1d enab1e him to move the garage to within three feet of the propel~ty l i n e . Further brief discussion fo11owed. H e nn1n g mov ed: L e n tsch seco nd e d : The Planning Commission recommend to City Counci1 the S foot utility easement on the south side of Lot 3, Snowbarger Subdivision be vacated, the 1ega1 description of said recommended va cat1on as .fo11ows: ··comm e n ci n g at th e s outhwest corner of Lot 3 • SNOWBARGER SUBDIVISION. lying in the SE-1 /4 SE-1/4 of Se ction 4, T5S, RGSW; thence east along the s outh 1ine oF said Lot 3, 8.0 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north and para11e1 to the west 1ine o£ said Lot 3, 8 .. 0 feet; then ce east and para11e1 to the south 1ine o f Lot 3, 182 .. 0 feet; thence south and parallel to the east 1~ne of Lot 3, 8 .0 feet to a point on the south 1~ne of Lot 3; thence west along the south 1ine of Lot 3, 182 .. 0 feet to the true point of beginning. This vacation does not inclu de the water line easement as recorded in Book 924, Pages 207-209 and 211 of: Arapahoe Cou nty Records ... The mot1on c arried unanimously. -2- • • 0 0 - - - ME MORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOM- MENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE : Septembe r 21, 1971 S U BJE CT : Easement Vacation, Lot 3, Snowbarger Subdivision RECOMMENDATION: - The P1anning Commission recommend to City Counci1 the 8 foot uti1ity easement on the south side of Lot 3, Snowbarger Sub- division be vacated, the 1ega1 description of said recommended vacation as f o11ows: ·•commenc i n g at the southwest corner of Lot 3, SNOWBARGER SUB- DIVISION , 1ying in the SE-1/4 SE-1 /4 of Section 4, TSS, R68W; thence east a1ong the south 1ine of said Lot 3, 8.0 feet to the true point of beginning ; thence north and para11e1 to the west 1ine o f said Lot 3, 8.0 feet ; thence east and para11e1 to the south 1ine of said Lot 3, 182.0 feet; thence south and para11e1 to the east 1ine of Lot 3, 8.0 feet to a po~nt on the s outh 1ine o£ Lot 3; thence west a1ong the south 1~ne of LOt 3. 182.0 feet to the true po~nt of beginning. This vacation does not inc1ude the water 1~ne easement as recorded in Book 924. Pages 207-209 and 211 of Arapahoe County Records.•• Respectfu11y submitted. By Order of the City P1ann~ng and Zoning Commission G"E G.. WE' Recording Secretary -9- -- T 32xl .. = - ""' _j <( <.....:> :z ltJI :::r: -_j t--- ::::> C> -:J <f) -; • • • ... OXFORD l? ~$a ~~ ~ 00 = ~0 ~:;. ~ -~ E = "" • E. ~- ~ ~"' ffi~~s; ,:-.; ~~ .,_ REQUESTED VACATION SEPT. 21. 197 ':. A .O K -- •••• r - '. • • • TO: FROM: • • - Honorab1e Mayor and C~ty Counci1 v~a Stan1ey H. Dia1, City Manager City P1anning and Zoning Commission O FFI C I AL C~ COU CIL DOCUMENT: n ·•J -r I , . ( 1 C OU :--.:C 1L :J FI L E CITY O F El'...GLE.,OOD. COLO. SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance Creating District ••p1ann.ed Devel..opm.ent'' The City P1anning and Zoning Commission. at its meeting September 21, 1971, voted 8 -0 to recommend to the City Counci.1 that the attached proposed ''P1anned Deve1opm.ent'' District be inc1uded in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. Respect~ . SUPINGER Director of P1anning on beba1f of CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION gw encl..: Draft of suggested District Regu1ations Sta£f Report dated August 17, 1971 Minutes: August 17, 1971 Septe.m.ber 8. 1..971 September 21, 1971.. cc: City Attorney September 27, 1..971 • • T 32X - - - City of En~lewood. Co1orado P1anning Department - 0 - PROPOSED August 13. 1971. Uraft:. II B PLANNEU DEVELOPMENT (PI>) DISTRICT Tab1e or Conten~s Sect~on Title Purpose and Description General R equ~rement:.s Pre-Appl.ica~ion Conterence Forma1 App1i c ation Review and Approval. Standards Development in Sta~es Changes in ~he Deve1opment P1an Annua1 Revi ew Completion or the P1anned Deve1opment:. Fee Approving A~oncy • Page 1 2 2 2 5 6 9 10 10 11 11 .11 -- '32xiC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 • 21 22 23 24 • • City of Eng1ewood P1anning Department • 0 ... September 21~ 1971 Draft III SECTION PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (P.O.) DISTRICT PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION: Tbe procedures herein contained are intended to permit and encourage diversification in the 1oca- tion o£ structures and the appropriate re1ationship of various uses and structures to their sites without inhibiting the potentia1 advantages of new and imaginative techniques and concepts in the design o f urban 1and use. These regu1ations are further intended to insure ~proved pedestrian and ve- hicu1ar circu1ation faci 1ities and the provision of usab1e open space. whi1e insuring adequate standards re1ating to the pub1ic bea1th. safety and we1fare and convenience in the use and occupancy of bui1dings and faci1ities. The a~enities and compatibi1ities of the P1anned Deve1opment c1assi~ication are to be insured through the adoption o~ a Deve1opment P1an which sha11 consist of approved maps. diagrams and written state- ments setting f orth 1and use re1ationships and deve1opmen t standards. The P1anned Deve1opment c1assification is to be app1ied to 1and on1y upon specific app1ication by the owners. or authorized representatives of the owners. of the 1and and after approva1 by the City P1anning and Zoning Commission; construction on said 1and is to take p1ace on1y after the ap- prova1 of the Commission and the recording of the Deve1opment P1an and its attendant documents with the C1erk and Recorder of Arapahoe County. Co1orado . • • • \ ! .......... • • • • 0 ... P~2 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: The PO District. which ~ay be combined 2 with any other zoning district. sha11 be sub~ect to the pro- 3 visions of this Ordinance inc1uding those of the basic zoning 4 5 district with which it is combined. Where a conf1ict in regu- 1ations occur. the regu1ations specified in the Deve1opment 6 P1an approved pursuant to this section sha11 app1y 7 except with 7 regard to permitted uses and dwe11ing unit density. 8 In order to encourage good design and f1exibi1ity, the City 9 P1anning and Zoning Commission may waive a11 or part of the 10 Subdivision Regu1ations app1icab1e to the deve1opment if it 11 is assured that a11 pub1ic improvements and conveyances wi11 12 be consummated through other documents and agreements . 13 PRE APPLICATION CONFERENCE: A pre -~pp1ication conference 14 shall be held with the staff of the Planning Department in 15 order for the applicant to become ac q uainted with the Planned 16 Development procedures and related City requirements. 17 FOa.~L APPLICATION: An application for approval of a Planned 18 Development may be filed by the owner or owners of the land or 19 by a person having an interest in the property to be included 20 in the Planned Development if such application is accompanied 21 by written authorization for such action signed by the owner 22 or owners of said land~ together with a statement signed by 23 the owner owners that they agree to be bound by the regula- 24 tions and conditions which will be effective with the approval 25 and recording of the Development Plan • • • • • • • • 0 ,. - VD-3 1 The app1i c ation wil.J. be made on a f"or..-n providt.•d by the City 2 and sha11 b e accompan ied by p1ans and written stnt..ement.s 3 show~n g the Co~1owing information: 4 (a) Pre1iminary P.I.aus A Pre l i minary Plan showi..n~ the major S details of the proposed P1anne d l ~ve1o pm e nt at a sca 1 e of 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 3 14 1 5 JG I ' 1 8 )9 20 2 1 22 23 2 4 2 5 2 6 not less than 1"" -50 " and in s uJ Cicient detai1 to e va1uate the land p1anning, bui1d i n ~ desi~n. and oth er features o ~ the ps·oposed de v c lopmen t.. The Pa -~limi nary Pl.ans mu st con- t..ain, .iuso:f"ar as i.s app.l i c ab l e, lh ~ r·ol..1ow.l.ng min i mum .l.nformat.ion : 1. 2 . 3 . 4 . 5. 7 . H. A Boundary Surv ey; Th e cxist.ing t.o pograp h~c chaa ·a c ter of the 1and ; The pro posed land us ~s ; Th e Iocation of a11 e x .is t.in~ and proposed bui1dings, s t.ru c tures and ~m p rovements; The d e nsi t.y and type oC dwell • n ~s, incl..udi.ng t:y p ic a1 The m aj or p uint.s oC ;:u .. :"·css to public ri.gh.t.s-ol-way,. t.lle int.e rnal Lra ffic and c ~r<·ulat~on systems,. 1.£ appli <.:able, off-street. par k ~ua.:, area!!::i , service areas,. and loadin~ areas; The locat.~Otl,. height and siz~ o£ propos e d s~gns,. Ce n ces ,. J~~ht.in g and adverti.sin~ devices i.nc1uding typi.ca1 elevations; Are as which :c•re to b e con v eyed , dedicated or re served .tot· publt.c purposes,. lnc...·ludinl-{, but: not: 11.m.i.ted to, • • • 1'32X 1 2 3 9. 4 10. 5 6 11. 7 8 (b) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 • 21 22 23 24 • 25 • • 0 ... PD-~ parks and recreationa1 areas. schoo1s. pub1ic bui1dings. or other pub1ic purposes; Areas subject to a 100-year f1ooding cyc1e; A genera1 1andscape p1an with major types of materia1s designated as to purpose; Designation of various stages for construction. if app1icab1e. Written Statement: The written statement submitted with the P1anned Deve1opment app1ication sha11 contain the fo11owing minimum information: 1. A statement of the present ownership and a 1ega1 description of a11 of the 1and inc1uded in the P1anned Deve1opment; 2. An exp1anation of the objectives to be achieved by the deve1opment. inc1uding bui1ding descriptions. sketches. or e1evations as may be necessary to des- cribe the objectives; 3. A deve1opment schedu1e ~ndicating the approximate date when construction o~ the deve1opment or stages of ~he deve1opment can be expected to begin and to be comp1eted ; 4. Copies of any specia1 agreements. conveyances. re- strictions. or covenants which wi11 govern the use. maintenance and protection of the deve1opment and pub1ic areas. • \ ~ • • - - - 1 2 (c) - 0 ... P~5 The app1icant may submit any other information or exhibits deemed pertin ent to the eva1uation o f the proposed P1anned 3 De v e1opme nt. 4 REVIEW AND APPROVAL: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 (a ) (b) (c) (d) Upon receipt o£ the app1ication. the P1anning Department sha11 be responsib1e for coordinat i ng the review o f the deve1opment p1ans by the various City departments and appropriate pub1 ic agencies cu1minating in the submission of an advisory report and recommendation to the City P1anning and Zoning Commission. Submission of the r e port and recommendations sha11 be accomp1ished within thirty (30) days after the fi 1ing of the comp1ete app1ication and a c opy o f the advisory report and recommendations sha11 be f urnished to the app1icant. Within thirty (30) days after receiving such report, the C ommis sion, after giving proper notice, sha11 ho1d a pub1ic bear i n g on the app1ication. The app1icant sha11 post the property of the proposed P1anned Deve1opment, in a ~orm prescri bed by the P1anning Department, giving notice o f th e pub11c bearin g . Within 60 days after date of Pub1ic Hearing, the City P1ann ing and Zoning Commission sha11 make written findings either approving or conditiona11y approving, or disapproving the proposed p1an, a copy of which sha11 be furnished the app1icant. A11 approved site p1ans for P1anned Deve1opments, in- c1udi n g modi fic ations or conditions, sba11 be endorsed by • \ 1 ~ -- • 1 2 :1 ·1 G 10 11 • 0 - .·n-6 the-("h ... ttr ·man uf tht...~ Ci.ty Pt •• nnlll).: .111~1 z.oni•IJ..! C"ommt :~:-•nn and !:ih.1ll l>e .-... .._.c ... a·d<"d in tilt • t•t t r• ,. ot t.lu • A•·=:.tpahoc County («:.•) Any p-. ... ,·~~·n appty1n...:; t.o th •· •·C",IIt"l:-IC'tl" dL"ci.siuu made undt ·•· the t-.~•·m~ ol thi::-.. Chap ter· sh.al.1 app'l.y lor evit •w w1th111 thi.rt.y <:H)) day th•• ••·••ur·<.: ut' c·o•r ·t.lt.al ".••·• uudc·r Hul e 1Ufi (a) (4) IS.:·f"o•··t.: appr ·ov~n~ ... l•t.tnt.-·•1 lh ... •vcalopmc-ut.. t.hc ap- 1~ prov1u~ a~-:.•·u··v sho..•ll m ake WJ."lltt..•n l inllr •t-:.~ t.haL Lhc Planned 1:: Dcvr l <.~pm£»nt. '"" 1ll. implt..·JR<.•n'l.. t.ht • pu•·po:-•·-t•f th.i....; Urd.i.nance and 1-1 of' th1.:-:; C h:.ptt..·r . anc.t • .10 addltl'"'• mc.·vl t.hc tottuwi.ng r~qu..i.re - 1 5 ment.~· )r. I '/ 1H 19 20 21 (a) ll!"'>cs p,·rmtt.t.ed · 'l 'hc usc~ th • Pl...tnned Jk·vel.opment: must spe cial .-.._ .... view·.: 11t t.he Ze>IIC Uist.t·••·t. .J.n wh1<.:h the Planned UPve 1opmf""n t. is 1 cu.·a t.ed ... (b) Th e Planru."d t.>cv••lnpmen'l. <.·on~1:--ott.·nt. with t.he i.nt..ent. of t.he Compr~chenssv .... · Plan and the pul1eies t.ht.·rc.in . 22 (c) The Planut .. d Development•:;;; J·c-ldt..ionship t:o 1.ts surroundings 23 24 25 26 sha11 be co nsid er~d in orU~r t.o avoi.d adverse eFfects to the ex1.~t.1..ng and possib1e Jut.ure dt>vcloprnent caused by t..raff'i c:-c srculat.ion . buil.U~n~ h~igllt: or bulk, 1ack of screen1.nt-:,, or :tnt.J·us'i.ons ot privacy .. • • • • • • 0 - PD-7 1. (d) l\11ni.mum requir~menLs Lor u::;oa.hJe Ol ·~·n spa.c--.. .... "'' l..l be met. 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 12 13 14 through t..hc avera 11 design and am• ., 1 1 • (.•S pr ~opnsed loa.· the deve1opment. Pri..v at.E-park and /o•-recreat..1una1 .. tt•·a~., o""ned 1n comnton ., may be co nsidered to meet Lh~· minimum us abl e open space .requir~ml(•nt..s it" t.ht.· C omm ission dc•tPrtn:Jnes t..hat. such areas w.i 11 meet. t:he f'o 1 1 ow:1.n g rc·qu 1 t·eme•• l s: l. 2. 3. Tht.· area. wtll l>e of sutJic:J.<t:""nl to ad<-•quate 1 y se•·v<· the eu t. 1 re deve I o p me-n t. J u.-""h ich it is design ed .. The area is a<·c e:ssi bl ..-a n d avnt labl.e to a11 of the oc .... upants of" dw~11 i.n g units Jur· whose l.t is intended .. The area will be used a nd 1s suit.ab1e l'or sce ni c ., 1andscapinK., r ec reation a l., or ..a 11 of the afore mentioned pur poses .. 15 (e) The number of o£L-s treet parking ~paces i n the proposed 16 deve1opm~nt wi11 not be 1 e ss than ~h e requirements of this 1 7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 • fo und to occur: 1. 2. 3. The probab1e number of automo biles owned or used by occupan'ts of t.he proposed dev<.~lopm e nt: wi11 be 1ess t:han t.ypi.ca1l.y f ound in Sl.milillt ~ dcve1opment:.s .. The par k i n g nee ds of non-reside nt.ia1 uses wi11 1essen t.h e overa11 park1ng n eeds of Lhe deve1opment. Vary1 n g t~mc periods of usage by m i xed uses i n the development: wil~ 1essen overall parking requ1rements .. • • • r 32x I[ • • • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 11 12 13 14 1 5 16 1 7 1R 1 9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4- • 0 - PD-8 ThP properly owners w1l.l p art•,.·ipate mandatory pa rt.1c~pat ~o n park~ng d~~t r1 c1 ~hJch ~•1 1 adequate1y m ~._..t.. the oJ 1-st.reet pilrkln.,;-n ~ .... -u..,.. ot~ the de v e lopme nt. (~) Site Plann~ng : The approv i nJ.!" a,;;c••t ·y s ha11 b<'-sa ti .sf'ied 'that the .site p1an .Cor t.he P1ann ~d Dev ... •l o pm e n"t. mee t s a11 of the ro11owi n g requireme nts: 1. 2. 3. The Planned Development. 1nust. u.._. planned 1n relation- sh.J.p 1...0 the su •·round.1 ng, :..a c a,. ;.and must be landscaped. In aUditi.on,. the site plan mu-t con't.ain a 25-.Coot buf:f"er str.1p in any pJ-opo.s ~d ..:h .... •ve1opment. which wi11 include mul.t:Lp1e -ramily or nou-J-es.1dent..-Lal buildings or st..ruct.urcs which is adjaccut: t.o a single family re s .1dent~a1 use distr1 c t.. Th ~ buffer strip sha11 be kepL free or bu~1d~ngs or sL ru cLures and must b e land sc aped, s c-reened, or prot.t.·c t..ed by natura1 ~·eat ures, s o 'that adv e rse eff'ect.s on sut ·r ·ound~ng areas are m 1 r1 1 '" t /.(.·~1; W i t.h • n t.h e Plan ned Dev e l.opmcu t., spa ci ng-must b e pro- v~d e d between bu~1d~ngs and scructures, K~ving con- S.1.de~:·at.ion to their in't.ended usc. their 1.ocation, de- si~n and heiAht., the pla~~ment and ext..ent. o £ facing window areas, and the t.opog raphy and such other nat.ural. Ceatu~:·es as w.tll assure pr~vacy and a p1easant e nvi.a·onme nt.; If t.h e area o.t" the devel.opm.ent is s uch t.hat an interna1 street. circu1at.i.on sysLem is u ec~s sary'~' s u ch system • • • T 32X • • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ]5 16 4. • 0 - PD-9 sh~l.l be d-.._·s•~ned :rot-t.h.._· t.yp·· ol t.1.-a1 ti c to be gcn.o•ated. ALl P1annc•d I.A_·v<"'-•,pmcntf'-l. must. have access to pub1ic st.•-C"e t.s. Ps.-.~.vnt.e. lnt.erna1 st.reets may be pet.,i.Lted it:' they can bt:.! used hy po1ice and .fire de - partme n t v ehicles for eme l ·ge •t cy purposes: Pedes trian ways must provide conven~ent. and safe ac cess to r~sidenti al bu~ldi n ~ ~ruups. open space area:-,.. recreat...l.ona1 a~eas. sc.·hools and nei.ghborhood shopp.1ng are n~ i.f they aro a p;:t•·t. or t..he P1anned Development.. and must. be sepa•nt.cd as mu c h as possi.ble from vehi.cu lat-traf"fic at·c.·as; Tht · ~1. te plan .-:.hall p•·uv1Ue lftl" t.hc maximum preserva - tion o l naLut·a l draina~L· ..l.rt:.·a~, vc~eLat.inn and other d~~ia ·:-tb1c-nat.•1ral feature s. DEVELOPMENT 1 STAGES· The a),provin~ a~~ncy may approve the implcmcntaL•~,n of" th'-· ueve 'l.opmcn l Plau i.n s't.a~es. However. for 18 publ1 c pat·k ;ar ... •a to h<...· c onveyc.•d, dedieat.cd. or reserved sh a11 19 b<" ot s uf.f'i c 1ent siz<.• to servt...• t.h<-dwt ll"Lng unit densitY for 20 21 that stage. o r or sutJicie n t s~zc t.o ~~rve the dwe11ing unit densi't.Y :Jo1· th e ent.tr~ devel.oprnent.. 1r the c onveya nce. dedica- 22 t:ion or re~e • vnt..1on C,.JI the pul.Jl i< o•-private park area is 23 staged. suc.·h p"'"lrk. a l"t...•a sha 11 be lo<·a t..._-tt ~n t.ha L part. of the 24 Planned Development. &ncl.ud ed in t.hat. ""'t.=.t~<"'. or elsewhe r e in 25 the P1anned nevel.opmcnt.. at a loca Lion accessi.bl.e to the dwel.l.i.ng 26 units t.o be provided in that st ag"=" • • • • • - • • • 1 2 • 0 - PD-10 CHANGES IN THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN : Except as provided berearter. no changes may be made in the approved P1anned Deve1opment 3 dur i ng its ~m p1ementation: 4 (a) Minor changes in the 1ocation. siting. height or character 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 o~ bu i1dings and structures may b e author~zed by the Director o ~ P1anning i~ required by engineering or other circumstances not forseen at the time the deve1opment pro- g ram was approved. No change authorized by the Director o~ P1anning under this Secti on may inc rease the size of any bui1ding or structu re by more than five (5) percent. nor change the 1oca ti on o~ any bui1ding or structure by more than ten (10) feet in any directi on; and provided that the Director of P1annina may not approve the re1ocation o f any bu i1di ng or structure so that the bui1d:lng or struc- ture is c1oser to any side or front property 1ine than was approved on the Deve1opment P1an. 17 (b) A11 oth e r chanKcs in the Plnnnod l~ve1opaent P1an, in- 18 c1uding cha nges in tbe aite p1an and in the deve1opment 19 20 21 22 23 24 schedu1e, must b e made under the procedures that are app1icab1e to the iuitia1 approva1 o f a P1anned Deve1opment. ANNUAL REVIEW: At 1eas t once every twe1ve months, the P1anning Department sha11 review a11 bui1ding permits which have been issued for the P1anned Deve1opment and sha11 examine the con- struct:l on which has taken p1ace on the site. The Director o-L 25 P1anning sha11 make a report o~ any vio1ations of the provisions 26 of this Chapter or o f t-e terms and conditions of the Deve1op- • • • • F • • • 0 - PD-11 mcnt P1an app1-ova1 to the P1annin~ Commission,. and the Com - 2 mission sha11 ho1d a hearing on t.he r-.·pu..L·L oJ violations sub- 3 mitted by the Director, having rirst ~ivcn wr1LLen notice to 4 the Planned Oeve1opment applicant and al1 owners of abutting 5 property ... Upon review of the a11eged v.io1ations,. the Com - 6 mission may,. i£ it deems nece ssary . require that approprinte 7 action be taken to remedy the v.io1ations. I f such action is S not taken by the applicant with in th.ir·ty (30) days ,. or if the 9 Commission determines that it is necessary to amend modit:y 10 the Deve1opment P1an. the Commission may amend. modify or 11 revoke the a pproval of the Deve1opment Plan giving written 12 13 findings therefor. COMPLETION OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT: pon the comp1etion 14 of the P1ann d Deve1opment, the Director of P1anning sha11 15 issue a certificate for the P1anned D eve1opme nt certifying 16 the comp1 etion and sha1 1 not e the issuance of the certi~icate 17 on an o.f".f ic•c--copy ot t.he of1'i ci.n1 Zon i 11~ Map ;-tnd on 'the Site 18 P1an. A~ter com p1et ion, the use of 1and and the construction, 19 modification, or a1teration o f any bui1dings within the 20 P1anned Oeve1opment wi1 1 be governed by the approved Deve1op- 21 ment P1an. 22 The City Counci1 may estab1ish a fee schedu1e for 23 P1anned Deve1opment app1ications to cover the c osts o £ pro- 24 25 cessing and review . APPROVING AGENCY: As used in this Chapter, ••Approving Agency•• 26 sha11 mean the City P1anning and Zoning C ommi ssion. • • , • • /' 32 X TO : FROM: S UBJECT: • • • 0 - INTEr.:-OFFICE MEMOUANDUrl\ Cit..y P1ann:i.ng: &:. Zoning Commission D ATE: J3mes L. Supinger, Director o£ P1anning August 17~ 1971 Si.gt;i..:Ci.cant Point.s o~ Prc:>P<>:":ed '_'Planned Development (PD) The proposed P1anned Devel.opment.. Ordinance, submitted in dra:Ct :Col.~n :Cor your review, could p].ay a signi..fi.cant ro1e in tile fut..ure o~ Englewood . Its purpose is to a11ow f1exi.bi1ity and a posi..tive approach to development and redeve1opmcnt rather than. the restri.ct...ive and negative approach o:C the usua1 zoning rcgu1at:Lons. Planned bevel.op- ment.. is basically an agreeJncnL bet.ween the City and the d eveloper which requires approval.. o:C speci:Cic p1ans and that the deve1opment be construcLcd according to the approved plans. The PD Dist..rict can be combined with any of: the regu1ar zoning districts with no minimllJTl area restrictions. It is the opinion of: tl~e sta£1: that no area restrictions shou1d be app1ied because the sma.11 d e v e 1opments, even one or two 1ots , need the £1exibility made avai1ab1e by this ordinance as much, or more, than the large deve lopments .. All specific reg:ulat..ious o~ t..Lle di strict.. with which the PO is combined would be sub,ject to modi-fication except the perm:i.t.ted uses and the dwc11ing unit densities . Because a change of zoning would not be ~nvo1ved (uses and densities remain Lhe =~me) the approval o£ plans ~or a Planned Development would be considered administrat~ve. The approval ""ou1d be by the P1ann~ng Conuniss:i.on, after public hearing, and would be f:i.na1. This procedure wi11 relieve the City Counc:i.1 of being involved ~n administrative detail .. Note t.hat dctni1cd and spoc.i...iic p1ans must be submitted :Cor approval o~ the PD . This pe1~1:i.ts area citizens to 1:ami1iarize themselves wi.t..h the proposed p1ans prior to tbe hearing, gives the sta:C£ adequate in:Cormation to analyze :Cor :i.t.s st..aff report and provides the Commission ••hard'' in:Cormation (not .,just pl-omises) upon which a decision can be based.. Af:tcr approva1 , or conditional approval, the plans and supporting doc\.Unent.s would be recorded wit.h the County Recorder. A gain , we feel ~h at the enactment o:C this ordjnnnce w:i.11 be a positive step in the 'future o:C Englewood. If the Commission :i.s gct,ern11y sat:i.s~ied with the proposa1, :i.t is suggested that a public hearing be scheduled ~or September 21 £or consideration o:f" a recommendaLi..on ~<> Ci..~y Council ... p~ct:Cu11~6bmi..t:cd, ~Gf'h--'--<-_ _,.__.,,.-- • • • • • CITY O F E:-o;GL E WOOD PL ~\:o-::"'l::"G r\:"0 ZO:-.:IKG CO :•t~tiSSION Au g ust 17 1971 I. CALL TO OROE H . "l'he r eg u1 ar m e c Ling: or t.h c Ci.t.y Pl.nnui.n g find Zoning Conuni.ssi.on was ca11cd t..o o~de1 · at. 8:00 p .. m .. b y C ha~rm an Car·l.son .. MC'nlbC l -:::i Pre se-nt.: M embc •·s Ab .s cnt.: W e i s t..; Vohe jda; S c nt:i.; PaLri.ck; t.1osbarger; Len.t.sch; H cnn 1 ng.; Ca1 ·1son Sup~ngcr~ Ex-oLficio Non e C:i.t..y Jan :q~:~r Dia l ; Assi.s t.ant.. Oi.:t.:ect..o r o1:' Planning Romans I1 . APPROVAL O F MINUTES . C l"lair=;:nanca;=:rsO""rl s-mC-d--=t:"l"ln t. t.he 11o1inu tC"s of: August 4, 1971. were to b e consSd a r d £or approvn1 . l .<'"n t..s ch :mov e d: Pat..l-.:iCk " SCCOIJ d C d: The :\l:l .. nu t.e s o'f August 4, 1971,.. be approved as writ -L e n .. T he mot.ion cal·1 ·.i.cd .. '11: I - Mr . Supi.n gcr st..at.e d thaL at. the meet..ing or August 4, 1971, members of the Commiss1on had que s t..J..on s about s ome o £ t.h.e items l..i.s t..ed in the study do cument prcp ~~·c d by Lhe City ~Iana ger "s o ££i.ce. and asked thac City Manager Oi.a1 att..eT'd t.h is meeti:-:.g to d:J..scuss t.h.c propoS ed P r ogram wi.t.h the Com- mi.s si.or.. .. Mr. Oi.a1 stat.cd ~h at h e appreciate d t..he opportunity to discu ss .the Capital.. Imp rov emcr.:.t.. Progr.am wi.th th e Conuni.ssi o r.. .. Mr. Dia1 not..cd tl1a t. t..h c P1 a nn~n g Commis si on does have a great responsibi.l..ity in rcv.ie,ving pL ... ojec t s pt·o posed by "th e Ci ty Acimin.i.strati.on . and in set..t.i.ng th e p1·i.ori.~y £or Cnp iLa1 1 m p roveroenc Projects £or the City.. He noted that t he revenue es t.:J..mates g i.vcu were "'h.ope£u11.y "' rel...i.ab1e --that it "seemed sa£e to count on•• spcr.ding S1.400 11 000 e ach y ear for the n ext five years £or Capi t....a1 I mprovemen.t.s.. Mr. Dial.. point..ed out that th e estimates l.isted J:'or :!.O di.vi.dua.l p rojects a:._-e not ""h:i..gh1y re:f"ined estimates•• • and that re- vi s.!.::H 15 may have t..o b e made . Mr .. Dial.. cited as an exa.mpl.e the Pol.ice/Fire comp1ex. whLch 1owest bid 'for construction excee ded monies budgeted by $286.000. H e s Lat..ecl t..h a t. if: City Council. determines that the project should be coo &t.cuctcd as bid. the $286.000 would necessaril.y have to be divc1·t.e d f"rom s o tne oth e r projects t.h at have b een proposed and budgeted. Mr .. Car l s on not.ed that in a •·comparison•· tabl.e o£ pro jects suggested by t.hc Co •mi::;s iOt' attd those ror which app.rop1.·i.at.ions were m ade in 1.971.. a uide v ar:iance i.s i.ud ica t.ed in the estimates the Commission was gi ven and t.h c .f:ina l. amoun"ts appt_~opriated.. ~lr. Di.a l st..at..ed that in the matter o£ t..l tc ~~~m-1 shcl..t.c r. t..h~ d1screpancy can b e t..l1e resu1.t of t wo reas ons : 1 . The= bui.l.dit •g was en1a1.·ged -::Cram what.. was origi.na11y pl.ann e d due to co~crac tu a1 agreement w i.t..h Arapahoe Cou n t y for the City to handl.e at::.ima ]s J"rom t..he un incorporated areas .. 2 . The bu:J..1ditag was much mo1·e expensive to construct than had been e s t ima t ed • Mr .. Dial.. st.nt.cd t.h a t.. wh~l c the Coutt cil. appropr ~at..ed $150 .000 for the Not-t.h wcs t. En g l ewood GJ·ccr.bc l.t vs .. the C onun iss .ion•s recorn.n\cnded $30.000 t..hat 0111y $80,.000 or $90.000 ha s b ee n commjt..ted at this time .. Discussion :Co1lowc-d .. • • • • r • • • Mr . C a rlson called £or Lh e vo~c: AYES: NAYS: ~lo sba r g cr ; Pn1...rick; Scnt.:i ; Carl s on; ltc nn:inc;; Lent.sch \'ieis t.; Vobej da ~he mo~:ion ca~r :i ed. hlr. Cnrlson th e n called £or the vot.e on the motion to approve the Capita l I mprovement Prog l -am , as am e nded : · AY ES: NAYS: ?\losbarger ; Pat.r:ic k; L entsch; Sent..i; Vo bc.:jda; Henning ; Carlson Weist. The motion carried. IV. CO:,l.PR.F.:HENS1VE ZONING O ROINA CE A~IENDMEN·rs Planned Development. D:ist.r:ict Case .="18-71. Mr. Sup:inger s1..ated that. t.his p ro p osed amendment to the Comp rehe n si v e Zon ing Ordinance, :i £ approved, wi11 gi v e n ~1exi b:i1ity and positive ap- p roach to d eve 1 opme n t. wit.hi n t.h c City . H e no~ed that Ordinan ces pro- vid i.ng for Pl..anncd Oevelopment.s are the ·•coming thing••. and h e :£el.t that the C~ty o £ Eng l ewood s hou ld t ake advantage o£ such an ord~nan cc. Mr. Sup i n gcr stated tha t. th e Planned Devel.opment Distr~ct would b e an ••over- lay·• on any Zone District wit.hin. the Ci.t.y . ~tr. Supinge r s1..ated that the p ermi tt.e d u ses l.i.s t.cd within a g iven zone di str ict would no t b e mod i.J:i.ed . no r could the residcnt.i.al. density o£ a di s trict be increased under the provi sions o:C this proposa l.. He stated that no area l.i.n1:it:ations have b een imposed on the proposal. as t.hc s mall. d e v elopments are as much in need o:C :Cl.exi.bil.ity as the large devcl.opmcnt.s. Specific plans will have to be submitted :Cor each d e velopme nt. and a public hearin g held by the Planning Goinmission . Jn asmuch as approval of a Planned Developme nt: woul.d not con s titute a chan ge o:£ zoni il g . th e ordinance is written to p rovide that adm:in~st.rative approval. by the Planning Commission i.s final.. The p1nn s :Cor the PD w.i.11 be 'fil.ed with the Cl.erk and Recorder o£ Arapahoe C ounty a:rtcr approval by the Commission . Mr . Patrick asked i.:C oth er cities in this metro area were opc~at~ng under this P1anned Devel.opment Ordinance? Mr .. Supinger repl.ied that this particular proposed ordinance is ••tai.1ored to Engl.ewood"• • but that several. cit.i.es in_ t.he area are considering or a1ready uti1izi.ng si.mi.1ar ordinances . · Mrs. Hennin g stated that she had understood one o'f the good points about a Planned Development. proj e ct. was the ·•variety o:r r esidential. types••. combini.n g multi.-:f":ami.1y with si.ng1e and two-f:ami1y uses and even comme rcia1 u ses i.n one ••devel.opme nt••.. She stated that she bad hoped that the City might. b e ab1e to d e vi se a simi1ar pl an ~or redeve1opment of the core area. Mr .. Supi.n ge r i.ndi..catcd such a developme nt could be accompl.ished. but: wou1d have to be done by ••l.egisl.ativ e action·· of the Council. Discussion f:ol.- 1owe d . Mr . Lent.sch. a s ked about the mai nten ance o :f" interior road s and p ri vaL e roads in a d e vel.opme nt? Mr. Supi.nger s t a ted that. i.~ 't..he road s are indeed priv ate . t.h ey are privately maint ai ned; i:f" tbey a rc ••public•• road s . the Cit.y wou1d maintain them. Further disc ussion £o11owcd . O rdinance An1endmcn ts Case #).9 71 Mrs. Roman s st..at..ed that.. th e sta:C£ is v ery involve d in t.hc r e v isi on o-r the C~m pr chcns~vc Zo n ~n g Ord~nanc e . but th e re arc two or thre e ~terns which the st.a.C£ :rce l.s shou1d b e cared J"'or prior to the time when the rev ~sio n o"'C th e cnt..i.re O r d i nan ce wi.11 b e cornp1e t.ed.. She noted that two cha.nge.s of cons~derab l e ~mpor~ancc are s u gges ~e d: 1. In th e R-3-A Dis tri c t. the pre se nt: restrictions stat.e tha t a developer mu s t bui1d n minimunt o:f' t..wcl.ve units . with no more t..han two rooms dc s.i.g n c d p rimari 1y :Cor s 1ce pi n s purpos es . I~ is proposed that t.hi.s restriction b e del.c t ed .rrom t.h e oJ-d i n:"tn cc .. -4- • • • • • • • CITY O F EKGLEWOOD PL..-\N_ IKG A~-o zo;-.;JKG CO~C.tiSSIO~ SEPTE ~lBER S~ 1971 I. CALL TO ORDER . The Re g u1ar Meeting o'£ th e City P1annin g and Zoning Commission was cal.l.ed to ord er at. 8:00 p.m. by Chairman Carl.son. Members prcse nL: H e n1'ing; Mosbarger ; Patr~ck; Senti; Vobe~da; Weist; Car:Lson Supinger, Ex-of£icio M e mbers absent.: Lentsch Al.so prese nt: D .. A. Romans , Assist3nt Director o£ Pl.anning Al.an Koepping. Dra:Ct sman • I I. APPROVAL O F ~II !'.'UTES. Chairman Car1sou stated t.h at the Minutes of August 17,. 1971. were to be considered for approval.. H enning moved: Mosbarger seconded: The motion carried . The A.linu tes of Augu st 17 • 1971, be approved as wri.t.ten .. I I I. PLAY...~D DEVELO~tENT DISTRICT CASE #l.S-7l.A Augu st ~'""71 Mr . Carl.son aske d that Mr . Sup:inger review t)'le proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance . ~lr . Supin.ger st.ated that the pub1ic hea~~ng on the proposa1 has b een set for Septem b e r 21s t , and th3t pub1ic notice has bee11 given in the o~fici.a1 City Newsp3per , the Eng1cwood Hera1d . Mr . Supinger stated that the propo se d a.mend.!t ent wi11 give f1exi.bi1.ity that is not presently a v ai1ab1e to deve1opers, and wi11 be of he1p in redevelop- ment of the o1der areas of town. hlr. Supinger stated that the Planned Development District wi11 be ••superimposed" over an existing zone district, thus the use and densities pe1-m.itted remain .. fixed .. , and the f1exibi1ity is given in the location of the structures, the ability to construct a ~our p1ex on 100 ft . frontage in an R-2-B Zone District rather th an two duplexes. for examp1e . Mr .. Supiuger stated that the d esignation of a P1anned De- v e1opment District is set up as aWninistrative approva1 by the P1anning Com1nission, with their dccis~on being fina1. and may be appea1ed on1y to th(._• ....:ourts . !\tr . Supinger s-ea ted that d ctai 1ed p1ans :for the P1anned Oe- v e 1opment must b e submitted nt the time of the app1ication. and ~f approv ed , must b e deve1ope d accor ding to those p1ans. City Attorney Berardini entered the meeting . Mr . We~st asked hlr . Supinger what kind of devc1opment under the proposed amendment cou1d b e expected? J.tr . Supinger stated that he "£c1t this pro- posa1 cou1d be uti1ized in deve1op~ng raw 1and, nod a1so in prov~ding incentive and £1exibility for red evc1opment ~n o1dcr sections o£ town . Mr. Supin.ge r point..cd out that there is no size restriction written into the proposa1, and stated that it is the "£ee1:1.ng of the staf~ that £1exi- b.i.1it..y is n ee d e d ju~t. as much and maybe more on sma11cr dcvc1opme nts th an. it is on 1argc d c v e 1opmcuts • ltlr. L entsch entered and took his chair with the Com.mission . Mr . Wci &L n s ked if the expenses a developer wou1d go to to provid e the d e tail e d p1and , etc., to submit with the app1ic::ation might prec1ude making u sc of this provision :£or sma1 1 devc1opmouts? Mr. Supiuger stated that i"f. t..he d~vc1op e r d es ires any £1exibi1~ty ~n his proposa 1. he wi11 have to make u s c or this provision . Discussion fo11owod.. Mrs . Henning questioned wh tbcr or not there was a conf1ict i.n the p rovisions o£ the proposed a.mCJldJncn.t and the cxisti.nt;' regu1.ati.ons? Further di s cussion. "£o11o"•;c d. • • • J'32X • • • ~lr. ~\osbar~~r asked ~l,aL ~oul.d keep de el.opers from erect~ng high-r~sc apar1....mcn1...s in every bl.ock und er this proposa l.? Mr _ Supint;"er point ed out t.h nt.. th e u ses :1nd d~nsi1..y remain the satne a~ are i.u e-xist.ence unle ss the d ve1op~r 1~qu~:sLs a rezo,,i.ng change; in <>Lher words~ an apartment houb c cou1d not_ Lc bui..11... i.u a sing1c-:CaMi.1y zone district even under the Pl.anned Dcvcl. op.neu't" Di~t.r.i.ct.--thc deve1opcr woul.d have to abide by the si.ng1c- iami.1~ restric-tions . ~lr . Supinger :Curthcr pointed out 1....hat. 1.hc Pl.anni.ng Com.mi si.ou 1uu.st. p.:1.ss approval. oi every Pl.anned Dcve1op.m.ent proposa1 bc:Core a Bui.l..d:i.n;; Pe-rmit. could be issued :Cor such _ Mrs. llenn:ing not d that. t..he 25• bu~~or strip rcqui.rcm nt~ as set :Corth on Page s. is more rcs~r~ct~ve on t h P1at.ncd v 1opmcn.t District. than i.s prescnt.1y in cxist.ence .. Sh asked i:t t.hi&. "ou1d app1y t.o properties scp~-ra ted by a st.rcet"'"t" Mr ... Sup:ir•ger s~at. d t.hat t.h st.r~ct scparat.i.on wou1d e1imirate th e 25 ~t .. buf~cr strip . and st...at.ed t.ha"t: l ""lC uticipat.. d more stringent:: requi1.~cmen.ts in other z.oue dist.rict.s in t.h~ r~viscd zoning ordinance . Nrs . H enni.ng stated that she not. d on P ge 7 "t..hat roin:i.mUJn requirements ~or open space aL·e meTJ.tioned . but. 1..h:at such rcqui..l~<..:nc.-.t..s aru ot set. :Cort.h in t.hc proposed ordinance .. Sbe a sked i.:t" t:his ""'as to b e 1c1"t ~o the discreLi.on o::{' the Commission? Mr . Supingcr statc·d that t.h CommissJon. wou1d have to decide on the mi.ni.mum requir me 1'lt.s .:Cor open space on each P1anne d Devc1opment that '\..hey con.side:rcd ... M..rs . H enning ask~d 1£ th e requi.remcnt that a landscape p1an be pr pared by a ••re::gi..s t.ered·' "l-andscape architect cou1d be putt.in g an undue burden on the developer o£ a sma11 parce1? Mr .. Supi..nger stated th at he £e1t the staf1 would be w.i.1 1 in~ to compromi se on that. point and not requi.:ra t:h.a.1.. :i.t. b e by a "..t.~cgi.st.c~c d '' landscape architect . ~lrs . H enning stated that sh would hcsit.ate to inc1ude such a requirement in the ordillance if it ~ould cause undu0 bu:.:"'dcns . Further disc ussion· fo11owed ... Mrs .. 1-I enn:illg asked i.£ the sta:ff "::{'clt this proposed amendment was t.he f~na1 st..ep in a P1an:l c d Dcv~1opment O r dinance. or w as it ''geutly easing us into a rea1 Planned Devclor.oment Ordinance • which '"'ou 1d a11ow different uses and d ensi.t..ies i.u O l"!e planned dev e 1opme nt''? Mr . Supin ~·~r stated that h e dido~ 1... fce1 t.hc City would nee d anything more in a P1anned Devc1opm eut O rdinance in t he :f'uture 1..han is p roposed in this amen dment . He po inted out that d ensi.t.i.es and uses cou 1d sti11 be changed by going through a rezoning . Discussion followed . IV . COIPREIIENSIYE ZOXING ORDINANCE "''"'i"j;'\~sce11au ous·..-~cndmctl.ts CASE P'19-71A August 17 . 1971 Mrs . Ro ans s-t.a"Led '\..n at the staf£ is p r oposing two changes in the R-3-A Zone Dist.ri. t.-. name 1y the r moval of the restriction that a minimum of 1 2 unit..s mus1.. be bui1t.. and that no more th an two rooms may b e d es igned for sl e~ing purpo ~cs ~n any o ne un:it . Mrs .. Romans £'loOt. d "t.ha't" i(": the R-2-B (Two-fa.mi.1y) Z one Dist ric t, there h ave be n prob1cms in 'that roany o:C th e ownerships are 75 ft. fronta ge wi.t h one old home lo ca~c d l.-h reon . It has proven econom ica 11y uu£easi.b 1 e to d e- mali h or remove the old house and construct a new sing l.e-'£ami1y u se o :::-even a dup1cx • on such a property . Under 1.-be p roposed amendment . a tri-p1cx v.,:n •ld b p <;rmi t:t.. d on the 75' ::Cron tn.ge ,. and a :fou r-·p1ox: wou ld b e pel.:'"TnitL e d on a 100 ft.. .. ix:·on.lag:e . Th is wou1d not. be increas ing th e d ens:i ty p e:nnit t:cd i.n "1.-h e R -2--B Dist .. eict . v.hich is 14 units per acre; b ut . it wou1d gi.vc 1.hc pt·opcrty own~"rs greater :1'1exibi.1i.ty in the r ede ve1opment of their p ropcrt.y ... Mrs ... R om;--us uo~ed th a t other amencbnent.s that have b ee n proposed are ·•hous e- k.._:.cpJ ng·• aJn...:!ndments; for ins tance • the pa rking sec tion i.n th e Supp1emen- t..ary ll og n1at..io ns w as amended to l:"..:;!quire i.ncreased off-street parking -£or .r~sid Jttia1 U S (._""S and was :£inu 1 on Augu st. 1.3. 1971... However , the p arl~i.ng rcgu1a~i01l.S were set forth sepa~at.c l y i.n each zone dist rict o£ the O rdinance , a1t-:d t.h csc ar<"" r•ow propose d :£or amendment to a11evi:atc th e possibi1ity o:f COh"i'u sj_on.. Bri.c:f' di oc ussior_. £o11o·wed . v . MEJlCJf/\NTS .f...t/\RKTNG l...OT -3 -;.nn_...,-Eij_"o·c-l ·--s:-Acoma St • CASE #20-71 Me . Car1 s on sta t e d t h a t C ommission m em b ers are in receipt of a copy o f a 1 .._ .. tt. .. ·r ~rom City Manat;cr Di.a1, u s kin~; thut tho Con'lmiss ion revi.ew pa rk.lng -2- • . , .• \ • j i I l ' I • • r 32x - • • • SEPTE~WER 21, 1971 v. AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDI ANCE P1anned Deve1op~ent D1 str1ct CASE W18-71B Sept. 8, 1971. Aug. 17, 1.971 Pat ric k moved: • Lent sch seconded: The Publ.1c Hearing on C ase ~l.S-71 be opened. The motion carried unanimousl.y. A synopsis o..C the Pl.anned Devel.opme nt Distr:i..ct was given by Mr. Su.pi.nger, and he sta ted that he woul.d wel.come any questions on the proposed Ord i - nan ce . There were no persons in the audience who wished to speak either for or against the proposed ordinance . Lentsch. moved: Patr1 ck seconded: The Publ.ic Hearing on Case "l.S-71. be cl.osed. Th e mot1on arr1ed unanimously. The Commiss1on reviewed the proposed Pl.anned Development District amend- ment. Mr . C arl.son stated that the approval.. oi: Pl..anned Oeve1opments woul..d be a new procedure. and he fe1t that a c1ear understanding o1: the reasons behind ~he P1anned Deve1opment District wou1d be o£ great importance. D~scussion fo11owed. Mrs . Henning stated she wou1d prefer that the 1andscape p1an to be presented as part of the P1anned Deve1op- ment not be required to be prepared by a registered 1andscape architect. It was agreed that this restriction wou1d be removed. There was con- siderab1e discussion on the GENERAL REQUIREMENTS section o f the proposed ordinance; Mr. Supinger noted that the Deve1opment P1an wou1d take precedence over the basic restrictions in the Comprehensi ve Zoning Ordi- nance with the exception of the permitted uses and density .. Mrs. Henning pointed out that the proposed PO District ordinance makes no mention of the p ercentage of 1ot coverage. permitted height. etc ... and asked how there cou 1d be a ·•conf1ict in regu1ations•• under these circum.stances .. Mr. Bet-ardin:~.. pointed out that the Deve1op.nent P1an, as approved, wi11 prevail.. o v er ~he basic zoning ordinance restrictions, except as to permiLted uses and density. Further discussion fo11owed. Mrs. Henning asked .1.f the ternt .. Deve'l..opment P1an'' was defined in the Ordinance? Re£erence was made to Page 1 of the proposed Ordinance, 1ines 12 thru 17 .. Th1s part1cu1ar definition was considered, and was changed to read : ·'The amen:i.ties and compatibi1ities o:f the Pl.anned Deve1opment c1assification are to be insured through the adoption of a Deve1opment Pl.an wh~cb sha1.1 consist or approved maps. diagrams and written state - ments setting .forth 1and use re1ationships and deve1opment standards. ·• Discussion ..fo11owed.. Mrs . Henning stated that the first sentence o:f the GENERAL REQ IREMENTS sti11 bothers her, and noted that she cou1d not ~ind any p1ac 1n the ana1ysis of this PD District where the re- strictions on height, setback. etc . are waived. She asked if these restrict1ons were not wa:i.ved by this Ordinance. did the requirements of the basic zoning Ordinance prevail..? Mr .. Berardini commented that he didn't th1nk the 1ndividua1 restrictions had to be waived in this Ordinance. Dis ussion .:Co11owed. Mr. Car1son d1scussed the time e1ement mentioned in REVIEW AND APPROVAL on Page 5. He questi oned ii: the 30 days as set forth in §(b) was su££ic1ent time £or the Commission to have the pub1ic hearing and render a decis:~..on? Mr . Supi n ger poin~ed out that the 30 day time el.ement mentioned 1s that 30 days a:fter receiving the report from the sta:ff. the Commission sha11 ho1d the publ.ic hearing. but the decision may be rendered for an inde~inite period after the publ.ic hearing.. Discussion fo11owed .. Mr . Berardini stated he woul.d suggest a time 1i.mit of 60 days after the Pub11C Hearing in which the Conuniss:i.on woul.d render a decision on a P1anned Development appl.ication. Section (c) o:f REVIEW AND APPROVAL was reworded to read: ·•within 60 days after date o:f Pub1ic Hear1ng, the City P1anning and Zoning Commission sha1.1 make written Li ndings either approving or conditiona1.1y approving, or disapproving -3 - • • • the p r oposed pl.an, a c opy o f which sha11 b e furnishe d the app1:i.cant ... Mr. Car1son asked what was meant on Page G. 1:i.nes 16-19. which states that uses in the P1anned Deve1opment District must be u•es permitted by r1ght or ··permitted by special. review·• .••. : h e asked what uses woul.d be permitted by special. review? Mr . Supinger stated that s uch uses wou1d be ·•condit1ona1 uses•• which now come be:fore the P1anning C om- mission £or approval. be£ore they c an obtain a permit to 1ocate in a s p ecif1c zone d1strict. Discuss1on o£ the GENERAL REQUIRE&ffiNTS section on Page 2 was a g ain he1d. It was determined that this section sbou1d be worded as fo11ows: GENERAL REQU IREMENTS : T h e PO District., which may be combined with any oth er zon1ng dl str~ct. s ha11 be subject to the prov~sions of this ordi- nance inc1uding those of the basi c zoning district with which it is com- bined . Wh ere a con f1ict in regu1ations occur .. the regu1ations specified i n the D v e1o pment P1an approved pursuant to this section sha11 app1y. except with regard to Per mitted Uses and Dwe11ing Unit Density .. •• • Further brie£ discussion of the proposed PO Distric t ensued. Henning mov ed: Lentsch seconded: The P1ann i n g C ommission recomme nd to City Council. that the proposed PD Di st rict Dra£t II a. as amended on pa ges 1 , 2. 4, and s. be adopted . The vote was c a11ed; Mrs. Henning stated that she wou1d vote in £avor o::f the motion. e v e n though she d i dn• t £eel. the proposal. ••goe s far enough £or a P1anned Deve1opm.ent .. •• Th e mot~on c arried unanimousl.y. VI. C OMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE M:a..sce1 1aneous AmendDlents Patri c k moved: CASE "'19-718 Sept. 8 , 1971 Aug. 17. 1971 Mosba rger seconded: The Publ.ic Hearing on C ase #19-71 be opened. The motion c arr ie d unanimous1y .. Mr .. Supinger ga v e a S\.Un.Inary of the proposed antendments.. He stated that it is proposed to amend the R-3-A District to de1ete t:he requirement o.f a minimum o:£ 12 units. and that no un it contain more than two rooms used primar11y f or s1ee ping purposes.. In the R-2-B Zone District, he noted that it is proposed to a11ow a tri-p1ex on 75 fo o t fr ontage, and a f ou r-p1 e x on 100 foot fro ntage. This wou1d not increase the density that 1S presentl.y p ermitted. but wi11 a11 ow the owners and deve1opers or R-2-B property f1exibi1ity in redeve1opment of some older areas. Mr . Supinger noted that the parking requirements are 1isted in each i ndividua1 residentia1 zone district, and the increased park1ng re- str1ctions that were approved by the City C ounc il.. in August are now being appl.ied to each individual. residential. district to conform with the restrictions 1isted in the Supp1ementary Regu1ations. A definition o.C an ··e1'fici.ency .. unit is a1so proposed as an amendment. There were no p ersons in the audience who wished to s p eak either for or against the proposed ordinance. !\tr . Pat r~c k asked if the amendments on parking were raising the required parking £or apartment districts to the 2 :1 ratio rather than the 1 -1 /2 :1? Mr . Sup i n ger repl.ied that such is not the case; rather, it is app1ying the n ew restrictions to a11 residential. zone districts instead of just 1~sting them in the s u pplementary regu1ations . Brief discussion fo11owed. Patrick moved: Weist seconded : The Pub1ic Hearin& be c1osed . The motion carried unanimously . -4- • \ ! ~ • • I' 32X - MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOM- MENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE: Septe~ber 21, 1971 SUBJECT: Adopt~on o~ P1anned Deve1opment District RECOMMENDATI O N: - The P1anning Commission recommend to City Counci1 that the proposed PD District Draft II B, as amended on pages 1, 2, 4, and 5, be adopted- Respectfu11y submitted, By O rder of the City P1anning and Zoning Commissio n . -10- • -- I' 32X • • • • 0 - TO: Honorab1e Mayor and City Council. via Stan1ey H. Dia1. City Manager c ~ FROM: City P1anning and Zoning Commission SUBJECT: Misce11aneous Amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance The City Pl.anning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting September 21, 1971, voted 8 -0 to recommend adoption o~ the attached misce11aneous amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance. The amendments rel.ate to: 1... Minimum number of units per buil.ding and maximum number of sl.eeping rooms per dwel.l.ing units in the R-3-A District. 2. Permitted uses and density in the R-2-B District. 3. Off-street parking in residential. districts. 4... Definitions .. submitted, l AMES L. Director of Pl.anning on behal.:f of CITY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION gw encl.: Draft of proposed amendments. Sta~f Report dated August 17. 1971 Minutes: August 17. 1971 September s. 1971 September 21. 1971 cc: City Attorney • September 27. 1971 • • '. "!' • • • • 0 ... NOTI C E OF pUBLI C HEARING No tice is hereby given that t he City P1ann 1 n g and Zoning C omm ission o~ the City of Eng 1 ewood, Co1orado, wi11 ho1d a pub1i c bearing to co~ence at 8 :00 p.m. on Tuesday, September • 1971• in City Ha11, 3400 South E1at i Street. Eng1ewood, Co1orado, on amendmen ts to the Compreh ens~ve Zoning Ordinance, Ordinance No . 26, Series o£ 1963, as ~o11ows: (1) Amending Chapter 22.4-2. R-1 -A R esid ence District, §k, Min i mum Private O f~-st ree t Park i n g, §§(2) Other Permitted Principa1 Use Requirements, to read: (a) Owe11 1ngs, two spaces per un it . (2) Amending Cha pter 22.4-3, R-1 -B Re sidence District, §k, Minimum Pr~vat e Off-street parking , §§(2), Other permitted P r~n cipa1 use Requirements. to read : (a ) Owe11ings, two spa ces per unit. (3) Amending Ch ap ter 22.4-4. R-1-C Res i d ence Di str ict. §k, Minimum private Off-street Parking, §§(2 ), Other Permitted Principa1 Use Requirements, to read : (a) Owe11ings. two spaces per unit. (4 ) Ame nding Cha pcer 22.4-5, R-2-A R eside nce District, §k. Minimum Private Off-street Parking, §§(2 ) Other Permitted Prin ci p a1 Use R equi rements. to read : (5 ) (a ) Sing1e-~ami1y dwe11ing ••. two spaces (b) Two dwe11ing units: (i) Ef~iciency UniT ••. 1 space/unit (i i) One o r two bedroom units ... 1 -1/2 spaces/un it (i ii) Three or more bedroom units •.. 2 s paces/unit Amend i ng Chapter 22.4-6 . entit1ed R-2-B Re sidence Dis- tric t. §§b. Permitted Principa1 Us es. b y adding thereto a new §§C3) reading: (3) Three or ~ore unit dwe11ings not to exceed 14 units per a cre. Subsection (3 ) Re 1igious Institutions becomes §§(4 ); §§(4 ) Educationa1 Institutions becomes §§(S ). and §§(S) Pub1 ic Bu i1d ings becomes §§(6). • • • r • • • • • - (6 ) Amending Chapter 22.4-6. entit1ed R-2-B Residence Dis- trict, §§c, Minimum Area of Lot, by adding a new §§(2)(c) to read: (c) Each add itiona1 dwe11ing unit •.• 3,000 sq. ft. per unit. (~~ Amending Chapter 22.4-6, entit1ed R-2-B Resi d ence Dis- trict. §§f, Min~um Frontage of Lot, by adding a new 11(2)(c) to read : (c) Each add itiona1 dwe11ing uni t ..• 25 feet. (8) Amending Chapter 22.4-6, entit1ed R-2-B Residence Dis- trict, l§i •• Minimum Side Yard, §§(2)(b) to read: §§(2)(b) Two or more dwe11ing units ••• s feet (tota1 14 ~eet for both sides) (9) Amend ing Chapter 22.4-6, entit1ed R-2-B Residence Dis- trict, §§k, Min~um Pr ivate Off-street Parking. §§(2), Other Permitted Principa1 Use Requirements, by de1eting §§(2) (a) and substitut~ng therefore: (10) (11) (a ) Other permitted principa1 use requirements: (a) Sing1e-£ami1y dwe11ing .•• 2 spaces. (b) Two or more dwe11~ng units : (~) Eff~ciency Unit ••• 1 space/unit (ii) One or two bedroom units ••• 1 -1/2 s p ace/un it (iii) Three or more bedroom units .•• 2 s paces/un it Amending Chapter 22.4 -7. R-3 -A Mu1t i-fami1y Resid e n ce District. §§b. Permitted Principa 1 Uses . §§(2) by d e - 1eting : ••w ith a min1mum of twe1ve dwe11i ng units . each dwe11ing unit to contain no more than ~o rooms designed pr~ari1y for s1eeping purposes•·. Sub-section (2) to read: (2) Mu1ti-fam i1y dwe11ings. ~nc1uding mote1s and motor courts . Amend ing Chapter 22.4-7. entit1ed R -3 -A Mu1ti-fami1y Residence District. §§k. Min~um Private Off-street Parking. by de1eting §§(1) and substituting therefo re new §§(1 ) to read: (1) Dwe11 ings: (a ) Sing1e -fami1 y dwe11ings ••• 2 spaces/unit (b) Mu1ti-fami1y dwe11ings: (i) Efficiency Unit ••• 1 space /unit (ii) One or two bedroom unit ••• 1-1/2 spaces/unit (iii) Three or more bedroom unit ••• 2 s pa ces/unit -2- • • • - - • • (12) • • - .... Aaeoding Chapter 22.4-8, R-3-B Mu1t i -rami1Y Residentia1 District, •tk, ~nimua Private o rr-street Parking, by de1eting 11(1) and substituting tbererore a new §§(1) to read: (1) Dwe11:Lngs: (a) Siog1e-rami1y dwe11ings ••• 2 spaces/unit (b) Mu1ti-rami1y dwe11ings : (i) E~~~ciency Unit ••• 1 space/unit (11) One or two bedroom units ••• 1-1/2 spaces/unit (iii) Three or more bedroom units ••• 2 spaces/unit (13) Amending Chapter 22.4-9, R-4 Rea i dent ia1 -Prores&iona1 District, lk, Minimum Private orr-street Parking, 11(1} to read: (1) (a) Sing1e-:raai1y dwe11ing ..... 2 spaces (b) Two-rami1y dwe11ing : (i) E friciency Unit ••• 1 space/unit (ii) One or two bedroom unit ••• 1-1/2 spaces/unit (iii ) Three or more bed r oom unit •.• 2 spaces/un~t (14) Amending Chapter 22.8. Derin1tions. by adding thereto under the de:rin:i.tion o f u.owe11:1.ng., a new 1§(6) Dwe11:1.ng. E££ic:1.ency Un:i.t -A dwe11i ng unit consisting o~ one room and :1.nc1uding a bathroom. kitche n. ba11way. c1oset& and din:i.ng a1cove d:1.rect1y orr o ~ the princ:1.pa1 room. pro- viding such dining a1cove does not exceed 125 square feet :i.n area. A11 persons interested w:1.11 be heard at the above tiae and p1ace. Pub1 isb: By Order o~ tbe City P1ann:1.ng and Zon:i.ng C ommission. GERTRUDE G. WELTY Recording Secretary • \ ! '!' • • I' 32 X I[ - TO: FR:OA'\: SU BJECT: • 0 - INTER.QFFICE fJ\EMO RANDUM Ci1...y Planning & Zoning Corrunission. D ATE: James L. Supingcr. Director of Planning Au gust 17,. 1971 Amcndmcnt..s to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinan ce Even though the over-n.11 revision o :C the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance is underway, the sta:C:C is concerned about two pro- vision s o1: the Ordinance which are posing inuncdiate problems to developers and is reconunending that these subs1...antive changes be made at 1...hi s time. First, the R-3-A Zone Dis1...rict prohibits the cons1...ruction o:C apartment uni1...s wi1...h more than two bedrooms and it also pro- hibits the construction o:C a mu1ti -:Cami1y structure wi1...h 1ess than 12 units. These provis.i.ons were written into the Ordi- nance as a resul.t oi a s1..udy by Watson Bowes severa1 years ag6. at wh~ch time the R -3-A Zone O~str~ct was des~ghed for the area around Swed~sh l\led:i.ca1 Center and the construction of units which wou1d be attractive to :famil.i.es was to be d:i.s- couragcd . The staff is o£ the opinion that these restrictions may have encouraged mcd~ocri.ty in apartment construction by pe .rm:1.t.1..i.ng onl.y efJ:ici.ency or one and two-bedroom unit~ and a person w:i.~ll a 75 or 100 'foot. si t.e was iorced to buil.d at l.east 12 units even though he may have been satisii.ed to bui1d a 1csscr number . It. is anticipated thnt the decision on t.he KLZ sit.e :zoning wi11 be made by the Co1orado Supreme Court in ~ e very near :fut.urc and. ass ·u.ming the Court wi.11 uphol.d t.he mul.ti-famil.y zoning. the deve1oper wil.l. want to start on that project as soon as possibl.e . The prel.iminary pl.ans that have been r~:ferred to the City are such that I am sure that the Ordinance as it is written woul.d precl.ude the devel.opment which is proposed . The amendment simpl.y del.etcs the ph2·nse ''with a minimum of twel.ve dwe11ing Ul~its. each dwel.l.ing unit to contain no more than two rooms designed primaril.y i:or sl.ecping purposes ... The second amendment is to be made in the R-2-B Zone Dis- t..r:i ct.. •rhe change would permit the const..ruction of two or more units if su££1cient land were avai lable. rather than l.imitin g the Development to dupl.exes on a 50 :Coot site . Tho density woul.d remain the snme. 3.000 square :Ceet o~ l.ot area • • • - • • • • • .. - per dwe11ing unit. but it gives the added ~1exibi1ity or a tri-p1ex on a 75 £oot 1ot or a £our-p1cx on a 100 foot 1ot. We are o f the opinion ~hat this wi11 do much to encourage t:bc owners o1: a substandard house on a 100 foot 1ot to tear it down and rep1ace it with a 1'"our-p1ex . where at the present time he cou1d on1y bui1d two dup1excs . each on a SO foot 1ot. The economy o r party -wa11s and bui1diog under one roof makes this prov ision attractive. The other amendments that are proposed are pure1y •·house c1eanin.g••. Eacb o£ the residentia1 districts are being amended to con:fo~·m wit..h the increased off-street parking standards and to add tbe de1:initi.on of an efficiency unit to the Dc1:ini~ion sec~ion o£ the O rdinance . Respcct£u11y submitted. JAJ.IES L. SUPI NGER Director of P1anning gw • • • I' 32 X [ I - • • ---- • C1TY O F EZ"GLE\\'000 PL A~NJ NG A .~D Z ONI G C O!\BtiSSION Aug u st: 1 7~ "1 9 7 1 1 ... C AL L TO ORUI::R . The regu1a~ meet1ng of ~h e C iLy P 1ann~ng a nd Zon1ng Comm i ss i on was ca11ed t..o order aL 8:00 p_m_ b y c ha1:rnaan C ar l s o n . t e mb<-•r8 P ~·oe,se nt · .t mbe •·s Abs~nt · "'""'i st V o be1 d a ; Se nt i : Pa t..ric k· 'I o s ba rge r: Lentsch: H~nn~n~: Car 1 s on Su p 1nger~ E x-of~1c1 o A1so Present · C ity Manag:t==r D1.a 1: A ssist...a n t 0 1.rector of P1anning Romans l_ 1... APPRO V A L 01-tl: TES . C ha irma n Car i son st.a1...e d t h a t the Minut e s of Aug ust 4~ 1971~ were to be co n s 1d red fo r a pp ro va 1 . L nt sch moved· Pa t r1ck s ona d: The mOt10n T T I. Th l t 1nu t es o f .Au g ust 4. 1971. be approved as written .. T PR<XiR...l\.M. M r. Supin ge r s t a t...e d that at t.he meeting o.C August 4. 1971. members of the C ornm:Lss1on l 1ad quest.1ons about SO!ne of t:he items 1isted in the study docume nt. prepared by the C ity Manager·s ot'"fice~ and asked tha't City Manager 01a1 a ttend this meeting to d1scuss the proposed Program with the Com- miss.ion _ Mr. D ial.. s~ated th a L he apprec:Lated the opportun~ty to d~scuss the Capita1 Improvement Program with the C ommission ... Mr . D ial. n ot...ed t:hat... t.h e P1ann:1.ng Comm~ssion does have a great responsibi1ity in rev ie w i n g p .ro j ect.s pr·oposed by the City Administration. and in setting the prior1ty fo r C apit.a1 Improvement: Project.s for the City ... He noted that t.he r e venue est...1mates g iven were ··hope:£ul.1y '' re1iab1e--that it ·•seemed safe to count on .. spend1ng S1.400~000 each year for the next five years for C ap i tal.. Improvem nt.s_ Mr ... D~a1 pointed out that the estimates 1isted for 1ndiv:Ldua1 proje-c ts a .re not .. b:Lgh1y refined estimates·• • and that re- visions may h a ve to b e mad e ... !r ... 0:La1 cited as an e xam.p 1e the Po1ice/Fire c omp1ex . ~hich 1ow st. b i d £or construction exceeded monies budgeted by $286~000... He st.a~e d thaL if 1ty C ounci1 determines that the pro~ect shou1d b e c oo s truct d as b~d~ the S2SG.OOO wou1d necessari1y have to be d1verted -Lrom s om e oth c 1..· p r o .J e c ts t..hat have been proposed and budgeted ... M.r ... C ar1son noted tha1.. .:a..n a ··comparison•· tab1e o£ projects suggested by 1.he Cornm iss1 on and t:ho s e £or which appropriations were made in 1971. a ~1 d e v aria n c e :l..S :L ndic ate d 1 n the e s timates the Commission was given and th e f 1na1 am o u n t~ appropria t e d. Mr ... D~a1 stated that in the matter of the a ni.ma l. shcl te r ~ 1...h d1 s crepanc y c an be the resu1t of two reasons: 1 . Th bui 1 di n g w a& ~n 1a r g ed £rom what was ori.g:l..na11y p1anned due to c ontra t ua1 agreeme n L w ith Arapahoe C ounty for the C ity to hand1e anim a 1 s f"rom the u n inco r p o ra t e d areas. 2... The b u ::~.1d i u g was mu ch m ore expe nsive to construct than had been esti.mat..ed ... M O~a 1 s tate d that wh1l.e the Counci1 appropriated $150~000 for the orthwest Eng 1ewood Greenbe1t vs . tbe C ommission•s recommended $30.000 t.hat onl.y SSO~OOO or S90~000 has been committed at tbis time . Discussi on £o11owe d ... • • • • \ ! ;. I' 32 X I - • • • Mrs. Henn1ng a~ked to be up-dated on the proposed rep1acement of F~re St.at..Lon =4 and a sub-s t:at1o n 1n Cent...ennia1 Acres? Mr. Dia1 stated that t:he rep la cement.. oJ St..a t.1 on =-4 in Scenic View is pr i.mari1y the ··rep1a""Cement oL a temporary bu1Id1ng·· pu t... up many y ears ago, and it is proposed that ~he new Station b r 1o at..ed to a ~or e cen tra1 i zed portion oC the Scenic View area. hlr. 01a1 po~nte d out that there is a de £i nite need for a sub- st.a t.ion .1..n t:hat area . Jl ::..1so pointed out.. that there is a poss.i.bil.ity that some land purchased hy the C~ty £or t:h Gree nbelt c ou1d be uti1ized as t.hc s:i..t:e tor t.hc .1"~"1 .~<:-Stal:ion a1so . • 1r. Uia1 stat d t.hat. t.h ~t:a't.e Insp c t ion Bure au r ecommen d e d the c1osing oL St:at:ion -=2 at. 1-..abo t:. Qu~ n c_• Avenue ::and South Pearl Street, and the re- 1ocat.:~._o n o.C .. St:at.io n =2 ·· to t.he Ce ntenn~a1 Acres area, which i.s isol..ated ~rom Lhe resL o~ t.h c1t.y , and 1S wit.hout easy access by the Eng1ewood .F'~re Ue pa rrm nt. Mr . Dial. stated that the City has c1osed Station .=t2 ~or t.he City of E n g~ewood p urpos es , but has it 1eased to Cherry Hi.11s Vi11age, whi c h ~ur1sd1ct.~on 1s k eping a tru c k there . Mr. Di.a1 stated that no l.and has been purc:has d £or t:.he Ce ntennia1 Acres station at this time. 1r. ~ 1st asked ~r t.he cont r ac tors bidd1ng on C ity construction jobs were 1nc1ud1ng a ··protcct~o n .Cac tor .. in their cost estimates? Mr. Dia1 stated t.hat. he d1d not know wh ther such was inc1uded in the bids or not. Mr . Wei st: asked ~l,at. a£Cec t the wage and price free z e announced by President !"'l1xon ""ou1d have on su h projects as the .fire/po1ice comp1ex? He asked 11 the C1 t.y wou1d b ne'£1t by rebidding the project? Mr. Di.al stated that h Le1t th e b1ds t.hat came in were very we11 grouped, and noted that a11 of th em were we11 over the architect's estimate . H e comme n ted th at he didn'L f ee l th e C1 ty wou1d better their pos i tion were ~h e bids re-1et . Fur~her discuss i on Co11owed. ~1.rs. Henn1ng aske d which Oepar~ment t h e City Forester wa s responsib1e to? lr. D~a1 scat d thatEn~1ewood, Littleton , and the South Suburban Metropol1"l..an Pa r k and Re cre ati.on District contribute financi.a11y :for this posit1on, and that. th e Forester is actua11y on the Cou nt y payro11, but is respons1b1e £or carryi ng out the program f or Eng lewood . Mr. Dia1 stated that ~t is hoped a ··re p1ant ~ng program·· can be instigated i.n the Ci ty in an e .tfort to replace the ~rees tha t must be removed because of disease, etc. ~rs. H e nning as k ed if this could a nd shou1d be inclu ded as a C apita1 Improvement project? Mr. Dia1 stated that it c ou1d be recom- me n ded as such by the P1ann1ng Commission. trs. Henning s~ated that she fe1t ap p ropriat:Lons should be made for a ~ree rep1anting program in the C ap1ta1 Impro v ements budget . Mr. Senti state d tha t he was interested in such a proposa1 ~ he 1ted the 2700 b1ock of South Pennsylvania where t h e Ci ty bad removed t.rees to facilitate the pavi n g p rogram, and he st ated that he wou1d 1ike to s e new trees plan ted in this b1ock t h is next year. 1r. Dia l excused h~mse1.f .CroJTl the meeting. Fu rther d:Lscuss1on on the t:ree rep1ant:i.ng program ensued. Mr . Supinger not._ed that th e Di.rec~or o.f" Parks and Recreation was consideri.ng a ••nursery .. ior the ity, and that perha ps t:his c ou1d be worked in c on junction with th c ree re p1 a nt:i.ng pro~ram. Mr. C arlson di.scussed the possibi1ity o f conduct:i.ng a ··p1nnt a t:ree week·• in the Ci."ty : he £e1t that the resu1ts '\lOOUl.d be v r y wor"l..h-wh:J..1e. Mr . Supinger noted that in Ca1i.fornia s ome c~c~ se11 to Lh e publ ic various trees for $2 .50 or so, and t h e City ~111 do che p1~nt1n g . Mr . Senti co~e nted that he fe1t 1f the City wou1d &.Lal-L the program . t.h e p o ple wou1d go a1ong with it . Further d.i.scussion 1o11oVrt.ed _ The rna c.t er o.C t.he conunu n:1 t.y center was "then considered . fr . Supinger noted T.ha t t.he Wot.·kab1e Program Ci t.i.z.ens • C omm.i. ttee members had recommended that this pa rt1cu1ar p rojec t be el..iminated comp1ete1y from the program. Mrs . Henn1ng sta Led that she di.dn"t feel it is suffici.ent1y important at "the present tim to inc1ude 1t i n the Capita1 Improvement Program. ~rr. Mosbarger ind:J..ca""Ced that he fe1t tbe school.. bui1dings could be pu t to greater use in the evenings , week-ends. and in the summer for meetings, etc . D~scussion fo11 owed. Mrs. Romans c ommented that at one time, member of the Schoo1 Board was appointed to the Planning C omm i.ssi on, and that this seemed to prov i d e a satisfactory 1iason between the City and the Schoo1 system . Further discussion fo11 owed. -2- • -. • • r 32 • • • • The priori ty for funds to underwrite operationa1 costs for a go1f course was discussed. Mr. Supinger stated that he questioned the priority given this project ; he fe1t there cou1d we11 be others o f gre a ter im por tance that do not have a high priority at the present time . Mrs. Romans noted that the C ity first began considering a go1f course for Eng1ewood in 1961. Mrs . Henning asked if a study had ever been made on the number of Eng1ewood citizens who use the Denver go1~ courses? Mr. Supinger stated that he was not aware of any such study. Mr. Weist stated that he thou ght there was a c o~ittee whose ex p ress pu r pose wa s to study the question of a g o1f course: he fe1t that perha p s this co-mmittee sh ou1d ••find out what the citizens of Eog1ewood want·•. Mr . Senti c ommen ted that he thought the per- centage of citizens in favor of a course wou1d run between 10$ and 12%. Mr . Weist qu estioned whether this wou1d b e s u fficient to su pport a g o1 f course. Mrs. Vobejda stated that she fe1t the course wou1d be s upported, and cited the di~fic u1ties go1fers have now in getting on a c ourse. Further discussion fo11owed. Henning moved : Lentsch seconded: Henning moved: Lentsch seconded: M osbarger moved : Henning seconded: Lentsch moved : Mosbarger seconded: The P 1anning C omm ission approve the Ca p ita1 Improvement Program as out1ined in the study doc ument prepared by the City Manager•s o ffice . The motion be amended to i nc1ude in 1972 budget i n g under the Parks and Recreation projects the estab1isb- ment o f a City Nursery and tree p1anting program ; no suggested f unding to be given by the Commission. The mot i on be amended to e1iminate the proposed commu- nity center f or $250.000 from the 1973 projects. The $60.000 funds f or the go1f course be de1eted in 1973, and $20,000 be added to projected funds for the go1f course in 1974. 1975. and 1976. ~~s . Henning questioned the proposed widening of South Broadway from Ya1e to Hampden? Mr. Supinger stated that this project bas been de1ayed due to the tra ffic study. Further discussion fo11owed. Mr . Car 1son ca11ed f or the vote to amend the motion by adding the City Nursery and tree p1anting program i n 1972. This motion carried unanimous1y. tr. Ca r1son then ca11ed for discussion on the motion to amend the motion by de1eting the proposed community center from the 1973 projects. Mr. Weist questioned whether the city and scboo1s cou1d cooperate on the use o f the a11-purpose room s in the schoo1s and satisfactori1y so1ve the need for a ·•community center··? Atr. Supinger indicated that he fe1t it wou1d ""h e1p •• so1ve the prob1em. Mr. Lentsch stated that he fe1t the community center wou1d be n eeded ••s om.eti..m.e••. and that he didn" t think the City cou1d re1y on the schoo1s furnishi n g such a need. Further discussion fo11owed . The vote was ca11ed: AYES: Mosbarger: Patrick; Vobejda; Car1son ; Henning NAYS: Lentsch ; Weist: Senti The motion carried . ~Jr . C ar1son stated the motion to amend by de1eting f unds for the gQ1:f course in 1973 wou1d be discussed. Mr. Weist questioned the budgeting of fu nd s for a ··non-existant go1f course ••. Mrs. Vobejda asked .i:f the 1and were to be purchased if funds wou1dn•t be needed in 1973 or before for this purpose? Mr. Weist stated that the funds which have been inc1uded in the C apita1 Improvement Program are for Operationa1 expenses on1y. Mr . Weist d iscuss ed the possibi1 it y or deve1oping an area a1ong the P1atte River as a g o1f course. and stated that be fe1t the p r oposa1, which bas been wide1y considered, has merit and questioned why the hesitancy to de - ve1op a course in t his 1ocation. Further discussion f o 11owed . -3- • • I • • • Mr. Car1son ca11ed £or ~he vote: AYESo NAYSo Mosbarger; Patrick: Senti: C ar1son : Henn:1.ng; Lentsch Weist~ Vobejda The motion carr1ed. Mr. C ar1son ~h e n ca11ed fo r the vote on ~he mOL:l..OD to approve the C apita1 lmp r ovemen~ Program, as amended: AYES o AYSo .Mosbarg er: Patrick: Lentsch: Sent.:1.; Vobejda : Henning: Carlson We1.st The motion carried. IV. C OMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS P1anned Development District Case -="18-71 Mr. Supinger stated that this proposed amendment to the Comprehensi ve Zoning Ord:1.nance, if approved. wi11 give a f1exibi1ity and positive ap- proach to deve1opment. within the City . He noted that Ordinances pro- vid i ng for Planned Deve1opment:s are the ··coming thing••. and he fe1t that the C ity of En g 1e~ood shou1d take advantage of such an ord1nance_ Mr. Sup.1nge r st..a L d that. the P1anned Deve1opment Oistrict wou1d be an ·•over- l.ay •• on any Zone Oi..strict within the City . Mr. Supinger stated that the permitLed uses 11st d wit..h1n a given zone distr1ct wou1d not be modified. not-cou1d t.he r sident1a1 densi..ty o:f a d1str:1.ct be increased under the provisions oL th1s proposal.. He stated that no area 1imitations have been im posed on the proposal. as the sma11 deve1opments are as much in need of fl.ex1b111ty as tbe 1arge deve1opments. Specific pl.ans wi11 have to be submitted ror each deve1opment. and a pub1ic hearing he1d by the Pl.ann1ng Comm1ssion . Inasmuch as approval. o f a Pl.anned Devel.opment would not constitute a change of zoning. the ordinance is written to provide that ad~inistrati ve approval. by the Pl.anning C ommission is final.. The plans f or the PD wi11 be fi1ed with the C1erk and Recorder of Arapahoe ounty after approval. by the C ommission. , Mr . Patr.1ck asked if other cities in this metro area were operatin g under this Pl.anned Oevel.opmeot Ordinance ? Mr. Supinger repl.ied that th1s particu1ar proposed ordinance i..s ••t ailored to Eng1ewood "". but that seve ral. c1ties i~ the area are considering or a1ready uti1izing similar ordinances. · Mrs . Henn~ng stated that she had understood one of the good points abou t a Planned Oeve1opment project was the .. variety of residential ty p es ... combining mu1ti-fami1y with sing1e and two-fami1y uses and even commercial. uses in one ""deve1opment·• _ She stated that she had hoped that the City mi gh t be able to devise a similar p1an £or redeve1opment of tbe core area. Mr . Supinger indicated such a deve1opment c ou1d be accomp1ished,. but wou1d have to be done by "'1egi.s1ative action ·• of the C ouncil.. Di..scussion fo1- 1owed.. 1\lr. Lentsch asked about the ma~ntenance o£ interior roads and priva~e roads in a devel.opment? Mr. Supinger stated that if the roads are indeed pr1vate , they are pri..vatel.y maintained ; if they are ••pub1i.c .. roads. the City wou1d ma1ntain them. Further discussion f o11owed. Ord1nance Amendments Case =19-71 :\trs. Romans st.ated that the staff is very .i.nvo1ved i.n the revision of the Comprebens1ve Zon1ng Ordinance. but there are two or three items whi..ch the stafL feels should be cared for prior to the t1me when the revision o~ the entire Ord inance wi11 be compl.eted. She noted that two changes of considerabl.e importance are suggeste d: 1 . In the R-3-A District, the present restrictions state that a deve1oper must buil.d a m inimum of twe1ve units. with no more than two rooms designed p rimari l-y for s1eeping purposes. It is proposed that this restriction be deleted from the ordinance. -4- • • 0 I' [ - • • • (_ 2. In the R-2-B Distr1ct. single or Lwo ramily uses are permitted on 50 £t . fronta~e; i£ a p erson ha s 75 ~o ot £r entage. he is sti11 permitted on1y the single or two-family use. Mrs . Romans showed s1:1.des o£ portions oC the City wh1ch ore pre sen ~1y zoned £or R-2 -B use, which slides de- p1.cted many instances wherein a developer c o uld remove two older deterio- rating houses and replace them ~ith a tri-ple x on 75ft., or a four -p1ex on 100ft., and have it be economically feasible . To replace the two old houses with two si n g1e -£am i1y homes, or even w1th two duplexes. would not be as economica11y feasible as the four-p1ex would be . . :trs. Romans po1nted out that there a re 186 acres of 1and in the City which have the R-2-B Zone d es~g nat ion; 3 ~ o£ that 1and ~s vacan~. and only 8 ~ of the land is developed a s two-family. It is re1t that the pro- posa.1 w~11 a11ow further development and encourage re -deve1opment. ~tts. Romans pointed o u t that this' is proposed on1 y i n the R -2-B Zone District .. Mrs . Romans pointe d out that this proposal would not be increasing the density perm itted in the R-2-B District. but would a11ow more flexibility in development ... tr . Senti commented that he fe1t the proposal s were very good.. Mr. Lentsch asked ~f the change in the R-2-B District would apply to areas along Broadway where an extension of the business zoning had been dis- cussed with property owners? Mrs .. Romans stated that it did not. Discussion fo11owed. It was determined that the Pub1ic Hearing coul d be scheduled for Se p tember 21. 1971, and that the C ommission should study the mat~er furt h er. V . DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF AGENDA ITEMS. Mr . Sup.inger stated that the present ··deadline'' imposed by the C ommission on matters to be included on an agenda is Friday noon preceeding the meeting .. ~rr. Supinger stated that this is not functional, inasmuch as no time is a11owed the staff for preparation of sta£f reports, much 1ess the c1ear~ng of matters with other de p artment heads, utility companies, etc . Discussion £o11owed . Mr. Supinger stated that he fe1t a two week 11mitation mi g ht need to be imposed, and suggested that a policy be pre- pared by tbe sta£f for consideration at the next meeting. This was agreed t o by members of the C o~ission. VI. DIRECTOR•S C HOI CE Mr .. Sup1nger stated that copies of a letter from City Counci1 requesting the Commiss i on to further s tudy the parking ratio for apartment develop- ments had been given the C ommission . Another problem which was advanced for Commiss1on study and recommendation is the situation which occurs when apartment deve1opers purchase a11 but one or two properties in b1ock--usua11y the midd1e property, and deve1op a11 around it with apartment houses .. Mr .. Supinger stated that.. attached to this letter from C ouncil are copies o£ a 1etter sent by t he P1anning Department to various apartment.. house owners requesting that the P1ann1ng staff be granted the pr i vilege o f i nte r view~n g the managers o f the apartment houses and the tenants in r e- gard the pa r k ing matter. C opies of the interv iew f orms also avai1- ab1e to the C ommiss1on ... . tr . Supi n ger stat.ed 'l.hat members of the C omm ission have been gi ven copies of a letter £rom Ci ty Manager Dia1 to City Manager Larry Borger o£ Littleton. in r egard to the adop tion of a Sign C ode.. Ir .. Supinger stated that, i n an effort to get both cities to adopt '•simi1ar .. codes. a member o£ C ounci1 and a member of the staff has been appointed to meet with officials of Litt1eton on the matter.. It is also fe1t that a member of the P1anning C ommission should be appointed to this committee. Discussion f ollowed .. Mr. Supinger noted that a Model Sign Code would be presented to the Denver Regiona1 Counci1 of Governments on August 18th . Further discussion fo11owed. Mr .. Bob Weist was named to serve o n the committee with Mr .. Supinger of the staff and Mr .. Leo Lentsch of the Council .. -5 - • • II • • [ • • • ( VII. COM!>H SS I ON • S CHOICE 11.1r .. Lentsch stated that.. a letter woul..d be coming to the Com..m.:i.ssi.on., directed by Council.., asking that the Commission review the parking needs i..n the 3300-3400 b1ocks o::f Sou"'th Broadway. Mr. Lentsch stated that he had attended a meeting with Messrs. Curry, Abbott, Peterson and Watkins, and stated that the C hamber of Commerce does have a stud y and p1an on parking for the core area. Mr. Lentsch stated that he fe1t the P1anning C ommission shou1d meet w~th these gent1emen, and give the p1an some study . Mr. C ar1soo ~urther discussed the request of Council.. to have the Com- mission 1ook into the prob1em of an ownership being 1eft between two apartment houses . He stated that he felt there could be some serious 1ega1 imp1ications involved in such an undertaking . Mr. Senti commented that no one could force a person to se11 his property. Mr. Supinger discussed progress on the Core Area revitalization planning. Mr. Lentsch discussed action by the City Council in granting an encroach- ment on a sidewalk for a canopy to a downtown businessman. The meeting adjourned at 10:35 p.m • -6- • • • r 32xl - • • • ( CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING C O MMISS ION SEPTEMBER 8, 1971 I. CALL TO ORDER . The Regu1ar Meeting of "the Ci ty P1a.nning and Zoning C omm ission was ca11ed to order ac 8:00 p.m. by C hairman C ar1son. Me mbe r s p r esent: Henning : Mosbarger; Patrick ; Senti; V obejd a; We ist: Car l..son S up inge r, E x-o ~ficio M e mbers abse nt : Le n tsch Als o p resent : D . A . Ro~ans , Assis tan t Di r ector o £ P1anning A 1a n K oe pp ing , Dra f tsma n II . APPRO V A L O F MINUTE S .. C hairman Ca rl son sta t ed t h a t t he Mi nutes of A u g ust 17, 1971, w ere t o be consid ered for a pproval... H e n ni n g m oved: Mos ba rger s e conded: The m o t io n car r ied. The Mi nute s of Augu s t 17, 1971, be approved as wr it ten .. I I I. P LANNED DEVELOPME N T DISTRI C T C ASE H18 -71A August 17, 1971 M r .. C ar1son aske d that Mr .. Sup:i.ng er review the proposed amendment to the C omprehe nsive Z o n ing Ordinance. Mr. Suping er sta ted that the pub1ic hearing on th e proposa1 bas been set for September 21st. and that pub1ic notice h a s bee n given in the officia1 City Ne w spaper. the Eng1ewood Hera1d. Mr. Supinger stated that the proposed amendment wi11 give f1exibi1ity that is not present1y avai1ab1e to deve1opers. a n d wi11 be of he1p in redeve1op- ment of the o1der areas of town. Mr. Supinger stated that the P1anned Deve1opme nt Distri c t wi11 be ·•super.imposed"' over an existing zone d i st r i ct . thus the use and densities permitted remain ••fixed •• • and the f1e.x:ibi1ity is g iven in the 1oc ation o f the structures. the abi1ity to construct a four- p1ex on 100 ft . f ron t a g e in an R -2-B Zone District rather than two dup1exes. f or examp1e. l\1r . Supinger stated that tbe designation of a P1anned De- ve1opment Dis t ric t is set u p as administrative approva1 by the P1anning C ommission. with their dec i sion being fina1. and may be appea1ed on1y to the courts. Mr. Supinger stated that detai1ed p1ans for the P1anned Oe- ve1opment must be submitte d at the time of the app1ication, and if approved. must be deve1oped according to those p1ans. Cit y Atto r ney Berardini entered the meeting. Mr . We ist asked M r. Supinger what kind of deve1opment under the proposed amendment c ou:Id b e expected? Mr. Supinger stated that be fe1t this pro- pos a1 c ou1d be uti1ized i n deve1op i ng raw 1and, and a1so in providing incen t i v e and f 1 e xib i 1 i t y f or r edeve1opment in o1der sections of town. ~~-Su p inger po i n ted out that there i s no size restriction wr i tten i nto t he p ro pos a1. an d s t ated t h at it is the fee1ing of the staff that f 1exi- bi1 i ty i s n e e d e d ~ust as muc h and ma y be more on sma11er deve1opmen t s than i t is on 1 arge de v e1opme n t s. Mr . L e ntsch e ntered and took h is cha i r with the Commission • Mr . We i st aske d i£ the expenses a deve1oper wou1d go to to provide the de t ai 1 e d p1ans, e tc .• t o submit with the app1ication might prec1ude making u se o f t his prov i sion f o r sma11 deve1opments? Mr. Supinger sta~ed that if the deve1oper desires any f1exibi1ity in his proposa1, he wi11 have to make us e o f this provision. Discussion fo11owed. Mrs. Henning questioned whethe r or not there was a conf1ict in the provisions of the proposed amendment and the e xisting regu1ations? Further discussion fo11owed . • • -,, • • I' 32 X I [ - • • • Mr. Mosbarger as k ed whaL w ou1d keep deve1opers .1'roTD erecting h igh -rise a p artments 1n e ve ry b1ock under this proposal..? Mr. Supinger pointed out tha~ the uses and d ensi~y remain the same as are in e~istence un1ess the deve1oper requests a rezoning c hange; in other words. an apartment house cou1d not be bu~1t in a si n g 1e-fami1y zone district even under the P1anned Deve l..opmen t District--the deve1oper wou1d have to abide by the sing1e- fami1y restrictions. Mr .. Supi.nger further pointed out that the Pl..anning C<>mm1ssion must: pass approval.. of every Pl..anned Devel..opment proposal.. before a Buil..ding Permit: coul..d be issued for such.. Mrs. Henning noted that the 25" b uffer strip requi rement, as set forth on Page S, is more restrictive on the Planned De velopment District than is presently in existence. She asked if ~his wou ld app1y to properties separated by a street ? Mr. Supinger stated that the s t ree t separation would e1im i ate the 25 ft . buffer strip. a nd s~ated that he anticipated more stringent requirements in other zone districts in th e revised zoning ordinance. M rs . Henning stated that she noLed on Page 7 that minimum requirements for open space are mentioned. bu t that such requirements are not set forth in the proposed ordinance. She as k ed if this was to be 1eft to the discretion of the Conunissioo? Mr .. Su pio ger stated that the Co~ission wou1d have to decide on the minimum requirements for open space on each Planned Development that they considered. h~. Henning asked 1f the requirement that a landscape plan be prepared by a ''reg1s tered '' landscape architect cou1d be putting an undue burden on the developer of a sma11 parcel? Mr .. Supinger stated that he felt the starf wou ld be willing to com promise on that poin t and not require th at it be by a ·•registered'' landscape architect .. Mrs .. H enning stated that she would hesitate to include such a requirement in the ordinance if it would cause undue burdens. Further d iscussion followed. Mrs .. H e nning asked if the staff fe1t this proposed amendme nt was the final step in a Planned Development Ordinance. or was it ··gently easing us into a rea1 Planned Development Ordinance. which would allow different uses and densities in one planned development••? Mr .. Supinger stated that be didn·t feel the City would need anything more in a Planned Development Ordinance in the future than is proposed in this amen dment . He poin ted out that densiti es and uses cou1d sti11 be changed by going through a rezoning. Discussion fo11owed . ~v-COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE uM.1sceiianeous'' Amendments CA SE =-19-71A August 17. 1971 Mrs. Romans stated that the staf£ is proposing two changes in the R-3-A Zone District. namely the removal of the restriction that a minimum o£ 12 units must be built. and that no more than two rooms may be designed for slee ping purposes in any one unit . Mrs . Romans noted that in the R-2-B (Two-family) Zone District:. there have been problems in that many of the ownerships are 75 ft . frontage with one old home located thereon.. It has proven economically unfeasible to de- mo1ish or remove the o1d house and construct a new sing1e -fami1y use or even a duplex _ on such a property.. Under the proposed amendment. a tri-p1ex would be p ermitted on the 75' frontage. and a four-p1ex wou1d be permitted o n a 100 ft. front age.. This w ould not be increasing the density permitted io the R-2-B District. which is 14 units per acre; but. it would give the property owners greater flexibility in the redevelopment of their p r ope rty . Mrs .. Romans noted that other amendments that have been proposed are ··house- kee p~n g•· amendments; for instance. the parking section in the Supp1emen- tary Regu1a"t:ions was amended to require increased off-street parking for resident ial uses aod was final on August 13. 1971.. However. the parking regu lations were set forth separate1y in each zone district of the Ordinance. and these are now proposed for amendment to a11eviate the possibility of c on fusio n. Brief discussion followed . v . MER CHANTS PARK~NG LOT 3400 Block S. Acoma St .. CASE F20-71 Mr .. Ca rlson stated that Commission members are in receipt of a copy of a letter from City Manager Dia1. asking that the Commissi o n review parking -2- • • • I' 32X IE - • • • n eeds in t he ·~v ~c::a.n i.t y o f the 3300 and 3400 bl.ocks of South Broadway.·• tr .. ar1son as k e d i £ the C ommission shou1d be doing research on the matter, and h o1d i n g mee t ::a.n gs with the merchants? :\lr . Lentsch stated th a t t hi s matter had been considered by Ci t y Council.., and ::a.t was ~e 1t tha t they d i dn•t have enough i nformation to make a decision. and r £e r red t he matter to the Commission for stud y and a recommendation to ounc'1.1 . Mr .. Lents c h s tated that he noted the staf f report recommends no ac t ion on t h e p ar t of th e C ity Government unti1 such time as the proposed ore Area s t u d y ::a.s comp1eted, un1ess ~unds for such s~udy are not appropri - ated in t he 1.972 bud g et.. Mr. Lentsch commented that l.and va1ue s are not de reas1ng , a nd he saw nothing wrong with the C~ty purchasing 1and in ~he d ow n tow n a rea f or park i ng . He stated that he fe1t the City shou1d want to k ee p the m erc h a nts in the downtown area ~n business. Mr. Lentsch s ta~ed that he h ope d t he s tudy wou1d be done. but fe1t that some assurance shou1d be g1 v e n L o the downtown businessmen that the City is interested and c on- cerne d . tr~ Le n t sch noted that there have been d~scussi.on.s and mee tings on t he p ark in g si ~uation in downtown Eng1ewood for at 1east 10 y ears . and h e di d n't ~ee 1 the C i~y shou~d wait to do something that is needed now; he £e1~ t ha t the ~ty ha s wa i ted too 1ong in the past for anything to happen . tr ~ Patr1 ck ques t i oned whether parking areas cou1d be secured on the east si d e of Sout h Broadway a1so. Mr . Len"tsch sta L e d "that he had met with officia1s of the Ch~ber of Com- merce . lr. A bbott and Mr. Curry . and these busi..nessmen are consi.der.i.ng the park 1.n g p r ob1 e m i n the downtown area. Mr. Lentsch stated that he fe1t the P1ann1ng C ommission shou1d get together with these peop1e and see if a p1an o £ act i on cou1d be devised. Mr. Supi.nge r not..ed that in a pre1i.minary study o£ the Core Area. it has been £ound that 30% of the downtown area is in public ownership--streets. schoo1s. uti1iti.es. public parking. etc. He noted that this f~gure did not include Swedish Medica1 Center. Mr. Supinger stated that be felt the City should use great care in spending of monies avai1ab1e. and noted that if the City purchas d the 1and it w ou ld be removed from the tax ro11s. He commented that the Core Area study may disclose that the City doesn•t need 30% or more of the downtown area in public ownership~ and may recommend large parki..ng 1ots. but not as many sma11 ones. Mr. Supinger stated that h e f elt i.t wou1d be .. prudent to wait•• on any action on the matter. ~~. C arlson asked if a Committee from the Commission should work with the Chamber of Commerce on the parking prob1em? Mr. Carlson asked Mr . Supinger i f he had attended the meetings of the Chamber of Co~erce on the parking s i tuation? Mr. Supinger indicated he had not. Mr . Weis-e asked if the Chamber of Commerce was ••making any rea1 effort on beha1f of downtown parking?•• Mrs . Romans sta "t:ed that the sta::ff bas worked quite c1ose1y wi "t:h the Chamber on s e veral. occasio n s when the matter of parking has arisen; she noted tha ·t the C hambe r o~ C ommerce has appeared before City Council to discuss the mat ter ; that.. e fforts to form an improvement district to purchase property ±or pa r king have been carried on by the Chamber o£ Commerce. Discussion fo 1 1 owed .. 1\U·s ~ Henning a sked :1.£ the Merchants Parking Lot was used by customers. or 1C i t is u s ed f o r e mp1oyee parking? Mr. Lentsch stated that the 1ot isn't ••p o 1~c ed v e ry w e 11 ''; he stated that some stalls are rented by the businees- m e n. but that the majority is provided for the customers • lt r. a r 1son aske d if a mode of procedure wou1d be suggested by the Com- miss:J..o n? Mr. Lent.sch stated that he would 1ike to see the Commission meet ""'i t:h t h e C hamber o£ Commerce on this situation. Mr . Weist commenT:.ed that t e f e 1t i t wou1d be ·•appropriate for the Chamber of C ommerce to pu._sh some- th i n g on "t:h1s . ·· -3- • • • I' - • • • ( Mr.Lentsch indicated that he had ta1ked with Mr. Watson of Cindere11a C ity. and that the Business and Occupational. Tax as a means of financing addition- al Capital. Improvements had been discussed. He indicated that Mr. Watson .fe1t Cindere11a City merchants woul.d approve such a tax for C apital. Impro ve- ments . Mr. Car1son suggested that Mr. Supinger shou1d meet with Mr. Peterson of the Ch amber of C ommerce. Mr . Weist stated that he fe l.t the downtown busi- nessmen shou1d have some sort of committm~nt from the Ch amber of C ommerce and C ity Counc1 1 on the parking situation. He noted that there seems to be some sort of hesitation on the par t of City Council. to give such com- mittment. and he stated that be fel.t there are reservations in the minds of the downtown businessmen on the sincerit y of the Chamber of Commerce to work for the downtown area . Airs . Henn:::a..ng asked if the proposed C ore Area Study had been discussed w:i.th any oL the downtown businessmen? Mr . Supinger indicated that it had been d1scussed with a few, and that no opposition to the proposa1 has been voi ced. D:::a..scu.ssi on fo11owed. Mrs . Henning commented that she didn•t see how the park ing p ro b1em cou1d be studied apart from a consideration of the entire downtown area . Further discussion fo11 owed. Mrs . Henning asked what use the City cou1d make of eminent domain? Mr . Berardini stated that eminent domain is the taking o£ private p r operty by a pub1ic authority for pub1:::a..c p ur poses. He noted that uti1ity com pa nies can a1so make use of eminent domain. Mr . Berardini stated that uses the Ci ty might make of this me thod i s pa r king 1ots, go1f courses, streets , etc . Mr . Berardini stated that the City wou1d have to negotiate with the owner of the private property , and then if such negotiations shou1d break down, the City cou1d a ppea1 to the courts . Mr . Berardini stated that the City must have a po1 icy estab1ishi ng the need o f the 1and p rior to the use o~ e~inent do~ain . Disc ussion fo11 owed. M.r . Weist stated there has been ·•a traumatic change•• in the downtown area in the 1ast four ye a rs or so, and noted that the C~ty administration ·~ent out of its way to encourage the deve1opment of Ci n- dere11a C ity ·•; be fe1t this wou1d be sufficient justificat i o n for the City to make an effort to he1p the downtown bus inessmen . Mr . Supinger stated that he 1'e1 t we bad to consider a "'1arger area than just the 3400 b1ock .. ; he i ndicated that he fe1t there w ou1d be p ro posa1s in the C o re Area Study that wou1d be of benefit to the wbo1e city, and that the Commission must 1ook to this end. Further discussion f o11owe d... Mr . Senti stated that he wou1d be a11 for the city•s p urchase of the 1and tomorrow if he fe1t it wou1d be the c omp1ete answer to the prob1em, but he questioned if it wou1d so1ve anything at this time . Be stated that he didn 't fee1 a change of o w nership on that particu1ar parking 1ot was going to be1 p the Broadway business~en at this time . ~tr . Lentsch stated that he di d n't fee1 the downtown businessmen cou1d ··wait forever ··, and noted that the businesses 1ocated in the downtown area do b ri ng in c onsiderab1e ta x money f o r the Ci ty ... He stated that be fe1t you had to •·c onsider it an inv estment for the City to keep these businesses 1oca ted in the downtown are a. •• He d i scussed the "'deca y .. that has o ccurred in th e c ore area, and sta ted that something must be done t o stop such de- cay ... ~r . Lentsch stated that the p roperty in question wou1d on1y increase 1n va1ue. and he stated that he didn't see how :it cou1d be wrong for the C ity to p urchase the prope rty . Discussion fo11owed. ~1r . C ar1son suggested that a meeting w:it:h the Comm.issi.on mem.bers, Mr . Sup~nger, Mr . Peterson, members of the Parking Com.mittee of the Cham.ber o£ C ommerce and offi.cia1s of the Eng1ewood Square ~ight be beneficia1. ~~. Car1son stated that be wou1d try to get such a meeting set u p ... VI . SUB~!1SSI ON OF MATERIAL F OR C O J\IMI SS I ON AGENDA Mr . Sup.l..nger stated that: pursuant to d1 rect :a..on from the C om.m ission at the 1ast meeting, a po1icy for su bm issi on o f requests to be inc1uded on the Commission Agenda has been drafted by t h e Staff. Brief discussion ensued. Vobe..Jda moved: Patrick seconded: The fo11 o wi n g po1:icy be adopted as submitted : -4 - • ~. • • lr - • - • ""POLICY FOR SUBMITTING REQUESTS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION w~11 be before 1t, ~t. of the Commission to the P1annin which they want leet.ings are he1d on the Tuesday .fo11.owi..ng t..he first and third Mondays of the mon~h. (I£ a 1ega1 ho1iday fa11s on the .first or third Monday, the P1anning Commis sion wi11 meet on Wednesday ni~ht rather than Tuesday night). The meet1ngs are he1d at 8:00 p .m. in the Counci1 Chambers in the City Ha11 . Th app1icant shou1d d.i.scuss his proposa1 w1th the P1anning staff prior t.o submitting his request to determine whether or not the proposa1 1s in con£ormance with the Co~prehensive PlAn and to determine zoning ordinance, subdivision regu1ations or other requirements. and the i~ormat1on which shou1d accompany the request. A1Lhough it 1s des1rab1e for the appl.icant to attend the meet1ng to ans""•e.r quest~ons of the Commission and to understand the reasons for the act1on taken ~ he is not required to be present . In the event he does not attend che meeting, he shoul.d contact the Pl.aoning Of~ice the fo11owing day to 1earn of the Commission· s action .·· Th mot1on carr1ed unanimously . VII. BOULDER PLANNING CONFERENCE September 30 & October i . M~. Supinger stated that preliminary notificat~on of the annua1 conference ror P1anoing Official.s held at the oiversity of Col.orado has been received . Mr . Supinger noted that the Commission budget for Conference and C onvention Attendance has a bal.ance of $44 .4 0 as of August 31, 1971 • ._Jr .. Car l.son stated that he fe1t "the Con.f'erence as many persons shoul.d attend as is possib1e. reservations might be shared if persons cannot is very wortbwhil.e, and that He suggested that possib1y attend both days . Mr. Lentsch ind1cated he would attend the Conference for both days, as did Mrs . Henning and Mr. Senti. Mr . Weist stated he woul.d try to attend the Co n£erence at 1east one day, and Mr . Patrick stated he would attend the C onference on September 30. Vl.IJ. DIRECTOR•S CHOICE tr . Sup1nger stated that co pies of the proposed 1972 Budget for both the Pl.ann1ng Commission and P1anning Oe p ar~ment have been given the Comm1SS10D members . Mr . Supi-nger noted that in the 1972 Budget, the P1anning Depart - ment 1s proposed to be combined with the Bui1ding Departme nt, and wi11 be c a11 d the Department o£ C ommunity Development . One position has been proposed ~n add1t1on to present staffing, and that is the position of Hous~ng C oord1nator, which position wi11 have charge of housing and re- deve1opm.ent:. Mr. Supi.nger noted that he believed the Work:ab1e Program C 1~1zens' Co~i.ttee is considering recommending additional. personnel. for ~he enforcemen t o£ the Environmental Code Program. ~1t:. ~ntsch st...at:.e d tha"t he didn•t feel. 'that budgets were ":Cair", and c1ted t.h times the C omm1ssion and Planning Department have needed to have work c mp1e t...ed without del.ay, and have been unable to do so because o~ the s hortage or funds for additional. personnel.. hiring of consul.tants or wbat- ~ver . H e s~a tcd that he felt the money shoul.d be requested and that it sh oul.d be approved so that the many projects coul.d be accompl.isbed. Di.s- c-u.::.S1on :Co11owed . Mrs. Romans stated that the Fl.ood P1ai.o Regu1ati.ons w ould be ready Cor Commission consideration very short1y, and the revised Mob1l..e Home Park Ord1nance wi11 fol..l.ow the F1ood P1ain Regul..ations ... -5- • • • • c - - - Mr. Car1son suggested that the discrepancy in trave1 pay for the P1anning C ommission ~embers and other board members be checked into. Mr. Suping er r e ported on the Sign Code meeting which be, Mr. Weist and Mr. Lentsch attended. IX. OOMMISSION"S CHOICE Mr. Lentsch reported that City Counci1 bad designated Girard Avenue from. E1at1 Stree t to Logan Street as two-way at their meeting September 7, 1971. !r. Lentsch disc ussed the Broadway/U.S. 285 interchange and the 1andscaping o:f the open areas in the interchange . Mr . Lentsch stated that the State H1gbway Department wi11 put in the grass, but if the City of Eng1ewood wants trees and additiona1 1andscaping, it must be put in by the City, and wi11 cost SS,OOO per year to ~aintain it; the trees wou1d on1y be a 4 £t . heigh~ at the time of p1anting . Mr. Lentsch no ted that there are approx~mate1y £our acres o£ open area to be consid ered. Mr. Lentsch noted that a sprink1ing system wi11 be insta11e d, but the City of Eng1ewood wi11 furnish the water, which wi11 amount to a ppr ox i m ate1y $1.800 . Discussion fo11owed . t.tr. Mosbarger conunented that he fe1t the g r eenery wou1d be better cared for if the City assumed the responsibi1ity . Discussion fo11owed . Mr. Lentsch stated that he fe1t this cou1d be a ver y a ttractive area, and wou1d aid th e downtown area revita1ization . Mr .. Lentsch sta~d th a t C o unci1 a pprove d a n O rdina n ce restricting parking within 20 ft .. of an intersecti on. and a1so a pproved an O rdina nce prohibiti n g trash cans in the a11ey right-of-wa y . It was moved and seconded that t h e mee t ing be a djourned. carried; the meeting adjourn e d at 10 :00 p .m . -6- -•• The motion -- '32xl - - - - SEPTEMBER 21, 1971 the proposed p1an, a copy of which sha11 be furnished the app1i.cant. •• Mr. Car1son asked what was meant on Page 6, 1ines 16-19, which states that uses in the P1anned Deve1opment District must be uses permitted by right or ··permitted by special. review ....... ; he asked what uses wou1d be perTnitted by special. review? Mr. Supinger stated that such uses woul.d be ·•condit~ona1 uses•• which now come before the P1anning Com - mission for approval. before they can obtain a permit to 1ocate in a speci~1c zone d1strict .. Discuss~on or the GENERAL REQUIREMENTS section on Page 2 was again he1d. It was determ1ned that this section shou1d be worded a s fo11ows: GENERAL REQ IREMENTS: The PO District, which may be combi n ed with any other zon1ng distr~ct, sha11 be subject to the provisions o f this ordi- nance inc1ud1ng those o~ the basic zoning district with which it is com- bined. Where a conf11ct in regu1ations occur. the regu1ations specified in the Deve1opment P1an approved pursuant to this section sha11 app1y, except with regard to Permitted Uses and Dwe11ing U n it Density. •• Further brief discussion of the proposed PD District ensued. Henning moved: Lentsch seconded: The P1anning Co~ission recomm end to City C ounci1 that the proposed PD District D ra ft II B, as a~e nd ed on pages 1, 2, 4, and 5, be adopted. The vote was ca11ed ; •~s. Henning stat ed that she wou1d vote in favor o:f the mo tion • e v en though she dido· t fee 1 the propos a 1 ••g oe s 'far enough for a P1anned Deve1opment. ·• The motion carried unanimous1y. VI. CO~IPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE M1sce11aneous Ailiendments Patrick moved: CASE #19-71B Sept. S, 1971 Aug. 17, 1971 Mos ba rger seconded : The Pub1ic Hearing on C a se N19-71 be opened . The motion carried unanimous1y. Mr . Supinger g ave a summ.ary o f the proposed ame ndments. He stated that it is proposed to amend the R-3 -A District to de1ete the requirement of a minimum o£ 12 units, and that no un it contain more than two rooms used primar11y for s1eeping purposes . Xn the R -2 -B Zone District, be noted that it is proposed to a11ow a tri-p1ex on 75 foot frontage, and a f ou r-p1 e x on 100 f oo t f rontage. This wou1d not increase the density that 1s present1y p ermit~ed, but wi11 a11ow the owners and deve1opers of R-2-B property f1e x ibi 1ity in redeve1opment of some o1der areas. Mr . Supinger noted that the parking requirements are 1isted in each i nd i vidua1 residentia1 zone district, and the increased parking re- stric~ions that were approved by the City Counci1 in August are now being app1ied to e a c h indi vidua1 residentia1 district to conform with the restrictions 1isted in the Supp1ementary Regu1ations. A definition o1: an ··ef.Ciciency·· unit is a1so proposed as an a.mendm.ent. There were no persons in the audience who wished to speak either for or against the proposed ordinance . Mr . Patrick asked i:C the anaend~ents on parking were raising the required parking for aparbnent districts to the 2 :1 ratio rather than the 1 -1 /2 :1? Mr. Supinger rep1ied that such is not the case ; rather, it is app1ying the new restrictions to a11 residentia1 zone districts instead o f just 1~sting them in the s upp1 eme ntary regu1ations. Brief discussion f o11owed. Patrick moved: We ist seco n ded: The Pub1ic Hearin& be c1osed. The motion carried unanimous 1y . -4- -• -- • • • Senti moved: Henning seconded: The P1anning Commission recommend to City Counci1 that the 14 amendments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, as 1isted be1ow, be a pproved: (1) Amending Chapter 22.4 -2, R-1-A Residence District, §k, Minimum Private 0££-street Parking, §§(2) Other Permitted Principa1 Use Requirements, to read: (a) Dwe11ings, two spaces per unit. (2) Amending Chapter 22 .4 -3, R-1-B Residence District , §k, Minimum Private O£f-street Parking, §§(2), Ot her Permitted Principa1 Use Requirements, to read: (a) Dwe11ings, two spaces per unit. (3) Amending Cha pt er 22 .4-4, R-1-C R esidence District , §k, Minimum Private Off-street Parking, §§(2), Other Permitted Pri nc ipa1 Use Requirements, to read : (a) Dwe11ings, two spaces p er un it. (4) Amending Cha pter 22.4-5, R -2 -A R esidenc e District, §k, Minimum Private Off-street Park i n g , §§(2) Other Permitted Pr i nc i pa1 Use R equirements, to read: (a) Sing1e-fami1y dwe11ing two spaces (b) Two (:i.) (ii) (iii) dwe11ing units: Efficiency Unit 1 space/unit One or two bedroom units 1-1/2 spaces/unit Three or mo re bedroom uni~s 2 spaces/unit (5) Amending Cha pter 22.4-6, entit1ed R-2-B Residence District, §§b, Permitted Principa1 Uses, by adding thereto a new §§(3) reading: (3) Tbree or more unit dwe11ings not to exceed 14 units per acre . Subsection (3) Re1igious Inst itutions becomes §§(4); §§(4) Educationa1 Institutions becomes §§(5), and §§(5) Pub1ic Bui1dings becomes §§(6). (6) Amending Chapter 22.4-G, e nti t1ed R-2-B Residence Distri c~, §§c, Minimum Area of Lot, by adding a new §§(2) (c) to read: (c) Eacb addit1o na1 dwe 11ing unit 3,000 sq . ft . per unit. (7) Amending Chapter 22.4 -6, entit1ed R-2-B R esidence District, §§f, Minimum Frontage o.t.· Lot. by adding a new §§(2) (c) to read: (c) Each additiona1 dwe11ing unit •.• 25 feet . (S) Amending Chapter 22.4-6, e ntit1ed R-2-B Residence District. §§i •• Min:Lmu.m Side Yard, §§(2) (b) to read: (9) • §§ (2) (b) Two or more dwe11ing units for both sides) 5 feet (tota1 14 feet Amending Cbapter 22 .4-G. entit1ed R-2-B Residence District, §§k, Minimum Private Off-street Parking, §§(2). Other Permitted Principa1 se Requirements, by de1eting §§(2) (a) and substituting therefore: (a) Other p ermitted princi pa1 use requirements: (a) Sing1e-fami1y dwe11ing ••• 2 spaces (b) Two or mo re dwe11ing units: (i) E£ficiency Unit 1 space/unit (ii) One or two bedroom units 1-1/2 spaces/unit (iii) Three or more bedroom units 2 spaces/unit -5- • • , - - ---- (10) (11) (12) (13) - Amending Chapter 22.4-7, R-3-A Mu1ti-fa~i1y Residence District, §§b., Permitted Principal.. Uses., §§(2) by de1eting: ••with a minimum. o~ twe1ve dwe11ing units, each dwe11ing unit to contain no more tban two rooms designed primaril..y for sl..eeping purposes··-Sub- section (2) to read: (2) Mu1ti -1"amil..y dwe11ings., incl..udi.ng motel..s and motor courts . Amending Chapter 22.4-7, entitl..ed R-3-A Mul..ti-famil..y R esidence District, §§k, Minimum Private Off-street Parking, by del..eting §§(l..) and substitutin g therefore a new §§(1) to read: (1) Dwel..l..ings: (a) Singl..e-famil..y dwel..l..ings ••• 2 s paces/unit (b) Mul..ti.-famil..y dwel..l..ings: (i) Efficiency Unit 1 space/unit (ii) One or two bedroom unit 1-1/2 spaces/unit (iii) Three or more bedroom unit 2 spaces/unit Amending Cha pte r 22 .. 4-8, R -3 -B Mu1.t i.-f ami1.y Residentia1. District, §§k, Minimum Private Off-street Parking , by de1.eting §§(1.) and substituting therefore a new §§(1.) to read: (1) Dwe11ings: (a) Sing1e-fami1y dwe1.1.ings 2 spaces/unit (b) Mu1ti-fami1y dwe11ings: (i) E££iciency Unit 1. space/unit (ii) One or two bedroom units 1.-1./2 spaces/unit (iii) Three or more bedroom units 2 s p aces/unit Amending C hapter 22 .4 -9, R-4 R esidentia1.-Professiona1. District, §k, Minimum Private Off -street Parking, §§(1) to read: (1.) (a) Sing1e-fa.mi1y dwe1.1ing ..... 2 spaces (b) Two -fami1y dwe1.1ing: (i) Efficiency Unit 1 space/unit (ii) One or two bedroom unit .... 1.-1./2 s p a c es/unit (iii) Three or more bedroom unit 2 spaces/unit (1.4) Amending Ch apter 22 .. 8, Definitions, by adding thereto under the de fi nition of .. Dwe11ingn a new §§(6) Dwe11ing, Efficiency Unit - A dwe1.1in g unit c onsisting of one room and inc1.uding a bathroom, kitchen, ha11way, c1.osets and dining a1.c o ve direct1y off o£ the principa1. roo~, providing such dining a1.c o ve d o es n o t exceed 125 square feet in area. Tbe motion carried unanimous1y. VI I .. MERCHANTS PARKING L O T 3400 Bik . S .. Acoma St . C ASE #20-71A S e p t .. 8 , 1 97 1. tr . Supinger reported that a meeting bad been be1d Th u rsday Mo rning , September 16, 1971, with representatives of the City Cou n ci1, P1anning Commission, staff, Chamber of Commerce. and businessmen in the 3300 and 3400 b1ocks o£ South Broadway. He stated that it was agreed that the City wou1d up-date the i n f ormat~on re1ative to p arking in the downtown area, and provide this information to the P1.anning C o mmission for their recommendation . Discussion fo11owed. Mr. Car1.son stated that Mr. Bob Owens bad at one time been chairman of a parking committee for the downtown are a, and be wou1d 1ike to see that committee re v ived . Mr . Weist a s ked if the additiona1. members of the C o mmittee bad been appointed? Mr. C ar1son stated that he w o u1d 1ik e to see the Commissi o n participate on this Committee. Mrs. Henn ing. •tr . Lentsch. Mr. Weist and Mr .. Patric k i ndicated they w ou 1d 1ike to serve o n the p arking com- mittee. Further discussion fo11.owed. -6 - -• -• - - - MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD C ITY C OUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOM- MENDATION O F THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DATE: September 21, 1971 SUBJECT: Amendments to the Com prehensi v e Zoning Ordinance RECOMMENDATION : - The P1anning Commissio n recommend to City Counci1 that the 14 amendments to the C omprehe nsive Zon ing Ordinance, as 1isted b e1 ow, be a pproved: (1) Amending Chapter 22.4-2, R-1-A Residence District, §k, Minimum Private O £f-street Parking, §§(2) Other Permitted Principa1 Use R equirements, to read: (a) Dwe11ings, two s paces pe r unit. (2) Amending Cha pte r 22.4-3, R -1 -B Residence District, §k, Minimum Private O £f -street Parking, §§(2), Other Permitted Principa1 Use Requ irements, to read: (a) Dwe11i n gs , two spaces per unit. (3) Amending Cha pte r 22.4 -4, R-1-C Residence District, §k, Minimum Pr i vate Of~-stree t Parking. §§(2). Other Permitted Pr inci pa1 Use Requ irements . to read: (a ) Dwe11ings. two spaces per unit. (4 ) Amending Ch apter 22.4 -5. R -2 -A Res idence District . §k. Minimum Private O ff-street Parking. §§(2) Oth er Permitted Principa1 Use Requirements. to read: (a) Sing1e-fami1y dwe11ing two spaces (b) Two (i) (ii) (iii) dwe11:i.ng units: Efficiency Unit ••• 1 space/unit One or two bedroo~ units 1-1/2 spaces/unit Three or more bedroom units •.• 2 spaces/unit (5) Amending Chapter 22.4-6. entit1ed R-2-B Res i dence District. §§b. Permitted Principal Uses. by adding thereto a new §§(3) reading: (3) Three or more unit dwe11ings not to exceed 14 units per acre. Subsection (3) Re1i gi ous Institutions becomes §§(4); §§(4) Educa- tional Institu tions becomes §§(5). and §§(S) Pub1 ic Bui1dings becomes §§ (6) .. (6) Amending Chapter 22.4 -6 . entitled R-2-B Residence Distri ct. §§c. Minimum Area o f Lot. by adding a new §§(2) (c) to read : (c) Each additional dwe11ing unit ••• 3.000 sq. ft . per unit. (7) Amending Cha pter 22.4 -6. entit1ed R-2 -B Residence District. §§f . Minimum Frontage of Lot . by adding a new §§(2)(c) to read: (c) Each additiona1 dwe11ing unit 25 feet . (8 ) Amending C hapter 22.4 -6. entitled R-2-B Residence District. §§i •• Minimum Side Yard. §§(2)(b) to read: §§(2) (b) Two or more dwe11ing units :for both si des) -11- 5 feet (tota1 14 feet -- ,. 32X I c - - - (9) Amending Chapter 22.4-6, entit1ed R -2-B Residence District, §§k, Minimum Private Of f -street Parking, §§(2), Other Permitted Principa1 Use Requirements, by de1.eting §§(2)(a) and substituting therefore: (10) (11 ) (12) (13) (14) - (a) Other permitted principa1 use requirements: (a) Sing1e-fami1y dwe11ing .•• 2 spaces (b) Two or more dwe11ing units: (i) Efficiency Unit ••• 1 space/unit (ii) One or two bedroom units .•. 1-1/2 spaces/unit (iii) Three or more bedroom units .•• 2 spaces/unit Amending Chapter 22.4-7, R-3 -A Mu1ti-fami1y Residence District, §§b, Permi..tted Princ1pa1 Uses, §§ (2) by de1eting: ••with a minimum of twe1ve dwe11ing units, each dwe11ing unit to contain no more than two r oom_s designed primari1y £or s1eeping purposes ·~.. Sub- section (2) to read: (2) Mu1ti-£3.Dli1y dwe11ings., incl..udi..ng motels and motor courts .. Amending Cha pter 22 .. 4-7 ., entitled R-3-A Mu1ti-famil.y Residence District., §§k., MinLmum Private Off-street Parking, by deleting §§(1) and substitut ing therefore a new §§(1) to read: (1) Dwe11ings: (a) Si~g1e-£ami1y dwe11ings .... 2 spaces/unit (b) Mu1ti-£ami1y dwe11in,gs: (i ) Efficiency U nit ..... 1 space/unit (ii) One or t~o bedroom unit .... l..-1/2 spaces/unit (ii1) Three or more bedroom unit ••• 2 spaces/unit Amending Ch apter 22.4-S., R-3-B Mu1ti-fami1y Residential. District, §§k., Minimum PriYate Off-street Parking., by deleting §§(1) and substituting therefore a new §§(1) to read: (1) Dwe11ings: (a) Sin.g1e-fami1y dwe11ings ...... 2 spaces/unit (b) Mu1ti-fam.i1y dwel.l..ings: (i) Efficiency Unit ..... l.. space/unit (ii) One or two bedroom units ...... l..-1/2 spaces/unit (iii) Three or more bedroom units .... 2 spaces/unit Amending Cha pter 22 .. 4-9., R-4 Residential..-Professi onal.. District., §k., MinLmum Private Off-street Parking, §§(1) to read: (1) (a) Singl..e-fami1y dwel..l..ing ...... 2 spaces (b) Two-family dwe11ing: (i) Efficiency Unit ..... l.. space/unit (ii) One or two bedroom unit .... l..-1/2 spaces/unit (iii) Three or more bedroom unit ...... 2 spaces/unit Amending Chapter 22 .. 8., Definitions., by adding thereto under the de fi nition o:C ·•nwe11in.g•• a new §§ (6) Dwel.l.ing., Efficiency Unit - A dwel.l..ing unit consisting of one room and incl.uding a bathroom, kitc hen., ha11way., cl.osets and dining a1cove directl.y of f o£ the princi pal. room., providing such dining a1cove does not exceed 125 square feet in area .. Respectfu11y submitted., By Order of the City P1anning and Zoning Commission .. Recording Secretary -12- • \ ! 'r II -- I' 32X I - • - REGULAR MEETING ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD September 21 ~ 1971 The meeti ng -as called to order by ChaLrman Robohm at 5 :06 P.M. bc>U NC 1L ~ •-oLE 12111!Jr!rti 'OF ~\1\.-00D. COLO Members Pre sent: Rob ohm . Harder, Menger, Moc k, Kreiling Members Absent: H or ton, Rosvall, Schw-ab , Lay Other Officials Present : Utilities Director Carroll 1. CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT WITH CHERRY HILLS RANCHO WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT: Mr . C arroll first introduced to the Board the connector's agree.me.nt whereby the Cherry Hill s Water and Sanitation District are requesting sewage trea~e.nt service for approxi- mately 43 residences in their Distr~ct. The connector's agreement was accompanied by a ''companion agreement'' whlll!!reby Che rrymoor South agrees to permit Cherry Hills Rancho Water and S anitation District to use it's outfall line to transport sewage to the Engle~ood system . Mr. Robohm inquired whether our C ity li~es would ~n any ~•Y li~it us in accepting these add i ti o~al customers . Hr. C arroll replied that the additional wastewater would feed into the 10 inch Jefferson Drive trunk line which is adequate. Mr . Carroll added that the proposed agreement, as received , is incomplete in that Exhibit A 9 which describes the area involved in legal te~s , is not now with the agree- ment ; however, it is expected within the week. Under these circumstances, he suggested the Board approve the proposed agreement contingent on the receipt of the legal description in the form of Exhibit A , and conti~gent on this description conforming to the general description provided by h~m at this m~eti ng . Mr. Horton recommended that Legal Consultant Shivers inspect and approve the agreement and Exhibit A. Mr. Carroll replied that the agreement is now a standard fo~ that has been examined by Mr. Shivers before and that the area in question is substantially the area -e no-serve -ater to, so the possibility o£ legal or practical complications here seems remote. Thereafter: MR . HARDER MOVED, MR . MOCK SECONDED, THAT THE BOARD RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT WHEREBY CHERRY HILLS RANCHO WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT SEEKS TO OBTAIN SEWAGE TREATMENT SERVICE FROM THE CITY OF E .NGLEWOOD BE APPROVED AND THAT BOTH THE C ONNECTOR•s AGREEMENT AND THE COMPANION AGREEMENT WHEREBY C HERRYMOOR SOUTH SANITATION DISTRICT AGREES TO TRANSMIT THE WASTEWATER FROM CHERRY HILLS RANCHO TO THE TRUNK LINE OF THE ENGLEWOOD SYSTEM THROUGH THE CHERRYMOOR SOUTH OUTFALL LINE BE APPROVED AND PROPERLY EXECUTED BY THE CITY: THIS RECOM:MENDATION TO BE CONTINGENT UPON THE RECEIPT OF .. EXHIBIT Au TO THE CONNECTOR•s AGREEMENT DESCRIBING THE AREA AS INDICATED BY HR. CARROLL ON THE MAP AT THIS MEETING. Ayes: Robohm, Harder, Menger, Mock , Kreiling Nays: None Absent: Horton, Schwab , R osvall . Lay 2 . RESO.L.UTIQ.N._ ON CHANGEO\l..ER..S IN THE 1971 WATER IMPROVEME.NT DISTRICT.: Mr. Carroll next presented to the Board a list of the streets and blocks which during the calendar year 1971 have been changed or are programmed to be changed over from ~aller inadequate water mains (s~aller than ~ inches diameter) to mains 6 inches greater in diameter. Mr. Car roll explained that these areas were selec ted by -. , \ "!' -- T 32xiC - identify~ng older maLns wher~ the existing pressure and flow were inadequate for local service or for peak demand for adequate fire protection in the area and after conCer~ing w ith the Street Department to coordinate with their street pavin~ program for 1971. He then requested that the Board recommend to the City Council tbat they pass a resolution declaring these old mains inadequate and so that the Utilities Department can proceed eo collect from the lando'-'D.ers on t:h.e affected streets approximately $25 .00 plus SOc per front foot a s prescribed by City Council Resolution dated July 16, 1956 . Mr . Harder then reported that an affected property o wner had complained to him that he had received no n o tice and Mr. Harder inquired ~hether notice had been ~~ven to affected property o wners. Mr . Carroll replied that during the planning for 1971 changeovers the Engineering Department ~as notified of our cha ngeover plans. Additionally, the Utilities Department cre~s distributed handbills notifying affected property owners of the impending inter- ruption in service and associated charges about 10 days before the changeover to the new main is accomplished. Mr. Harder agreed that the changeovers were necessary and that the coordination with Engineering was essential, but maintained thaL a better procedure should be used to insure that the property o~ers to be affected are notified in time to perm~t them to register their concern before digging commences. Mr. Sch~ab arrived at 5 :1 7 and was sea~d . Mr . Carroll then assured Mr . Harder and the Board that when the plans for the 1972 changeovers are finalized in conjunc tio n with the Engineering Depar~ent, he -~11 insure that clear and timely n otic e of these plans is given . MR. KREI.LI G THEN MOVED , MR. MENGER SECONDED . THA T THE BOARD RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE CITY ADOPT A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE OLD WATER HAINS INADEQUATE ON THE STREETS AND BLOCKS LISTED BELOW AND AUTHORIZING THE UTILITIES DEPARTMENT TO COLLECT C HARGES FOR THESE CHANGE- OVERS IN A CCORDANCE W ITH THE SC HEDULES ESTABLISHED BY C£TY COUNCI L RESOLUTION DATED JULY 16, 1956 : 900, 1000 . 6. 1100 Block on East Amherst Avenue 2700 Bloc k on South Ogden Street 2700 Block on South Emerson Street 3200 Block South Humboldt Street 3900 Block So uth Logan Street 4500 Block on South Acoma Street 3100 Block on South Delaware Street Ayes: Robohm, Harder, Menger . Mock, Kreiling, Schwab ays : None Absent : H.::>rton . Rosvat.l 3 . RESULTS OF SELF-INSPECTION : Mr. C arroll then distributed t o the Board copies of a 15 page Self-Inspection Questionnaire authored by the American Water Works Association Inc. and compl eted by Mr . C arroll through reference to the facilities and programs o£ the department as t.hey O O 'k stand . The summary sheet of the document is att.ached to these minutes Attachment 3; the complete document is avaiLable in the Utiliti es Office. e Mr . Horton arrived at 5 :28 P.M. and was sea ted. • Th ce ensued a di sc u s ~ion o f those areas where deficiencies had been identified from which emerged the f o l1 o win6: Mr. Carroll indicated that next year we will work to provide back-up power that is needed to insure uninterrupted service from our plants • Mr . H orton urg ed M r . Carroll to encourage a nd assis t thos e o pe ra tors at the Wa t er -2- -• -- - ··~ - • ' • plant who seem capable and ineerested in ~mprov~ng their abilities to step in should -e ever lose our present super~ntendent. Mr. Robohm observed that it appeared that our s y stem was a good one and that the provision of the larger mains in the high value areas together w~th ~he prov ision of the additional storage capacity both of ~bich projects are already under consideration will go a long way toward remedying the deficiencies identified. Hr. Carroll and the others present concurred in this statement. 4. SUPPLEM-ENT H3 TO CONNECTOR'S AGREEMENT WITH TiiE SHERI. DAN SANITATION DI.STRI.CT: (Chauncey Dunn property) Mr. Carroll next introduced the proposed Supplement #3 to the Conn e ctor •s Agreement w 1tb the Sheridan Sanitation District. He explained that the area in que stion vas an addition to the mobile home development operated by Hr. Chauncey Dunn who is already served by our system and th a t the addition had been approved by the Valley Sanitation Di strict through whose outfall line the additional 'W&Ste·water would flow to our treabnent plant. In response to questioning he affi~d that Sheridan is a distric t which doe s pay head tap fees. Then MR. SCHWAB MOVED, MR . KREILING SECONDED , TH.AT "niE BOARD RECOMMEND TO THE CITY C OUNCI.L ni.AT THE LAND DESCRJ:BED J:N SUPPLEMENT #3 TO OUR COt•;:N-ECTOR • S AGR..EEHENT Ayes: Nays: None WITH SHERIDAN STANITATION DISTRICT BE APPROVED FOR INCLUSION I.N THAT DISTRICT AND THAT SAID SUPPLEMENT BE APPROVED AND PROPERLY EXECUTED BY THE CI.TY . Absent : R osvall. Lay 5. 1972 BUDGET ESTIMATE: Hr. Carroll highlighted the 1972 budget submitted as i t will be considered by City Council . He showed operating revenue s and ~expenses and how they compared ~th 1968: • W A TER FUND Operating Re venues Total Revenue s Operating Expenses Total Expen ses $1 .014 ,262 1 .129,822 634 .346 2,132 .7 84 22 per c e nt 29 per cent 26 p e r cent 46 pe r c en t 1968 1968 1968 1968 (Water sales revenues based 10 per cent rate increase effe ctive Jan. 1, 19 7 2) Net change in cash assets ($868 .962 ) Fringe benefits rose from $3 .570 in 19 6 8 to $30.661 ~n 1972 SEWER FUND Operating Revenues $ 500 .176 92 per c.eno:c 19 6 8 Total Revenues 1 ,178 ,559 315 per cent 1 968 Operating Expenses 342 .542 88 per cent 196 8 Total E.xpenses 1 ,453 .355 609 per cen~ 1968 Net change i n cash assets ($220.796) NOTE : Fringe b~nefit s ros~ from $750 in 1968 to $21 ,574 in 1972 -3- 1 I } I I 4 \ ·'' ~ II • • r 32x :(J - - - - 6. BOREAS PASS WATER R1GHTS : Hr. Horton then i.nqui.red .as to whether Hr. Carroll had recei.ved any offers from prospective buyers of the Ci.t:.y water r:L ghts i.n th.e B oreas Pass area. Hr. Carro11 reported that he had received i.nqui.re s from three enai.neers re presenti.ng three possible buyers but none had as yet come forward with an offer to buy. Hr. Krei.Li.ng suggested that the City might investigate the possibi.1i.ty of directing the water fl ow from this source to Dillon Reservoir and c onclude an exchange agreement w1th Denver for this water. Hr. Robohm expressed concern that other partie s on the western slope wi.ll try to take this resource from us charging •·abandonment., and fai.lure to use diligence in develop:lng the water p otential there . He re~terated b~s ~arl~er re c ommendat~on that the Board se11 th~s ass@t as soon as a good and reasonable offer ~s rece~ved. Hr. Carroll assured the Board that the Department ~s conti.n.u~ng to measure flow and record th~s data as a means of showi.ng "di.l~g en ce•• and that be i.s acti.vely engaged i.n soli.c~ti.ng bids for the se rights . 7 . Hr. R obohm and o thers of the B oard then reported that they had recei.ved !.etters from Hr. Gabor Czech , through whose property our water transmdssi.on li.ne i.s bei.ng lai.d bri.ngi.ng western slope water to the ~astern sl ope. The letter (no copy of wbi.cb i.s available at tne meeti.ng) allegedly c harges that dne construction i.n proaress on the writer•s property i.s harm~ng the environment and i.s vi.olati.ng the te~s of the agreement provi.di.ng access through the property. Hr . C arroll sai.d that be bad not recei.ved a copy of the let~er . He promised to obtai.n a copy, i.nspect the alleged vi.olations and confer ~th l egal consultant Shi.vers about thi.s m.tter. There be i.ng no further bus~ness •• HR. KREILING MOVED, MR. HORTON SECONDED, THAT THE MEET ING BE ADJOURNED Aye s : Robohm, Harder, Menger, Hock, Krei.ling, Schwab, Horton N a ys : Absent: Ros val.l , L a y The meeti.ng wa s adjourned at 6:25 P .M . -4- - DALLAS K. STEPHENS Recordi.ng Secretary -- 1'32X - • • • MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CI.TY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTI.ON OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD DATE: S eptembe r 21. 1 971 SU BJECT : Appro va l o f C onnector~s Agreem~nt for Sewage Trea~nt Service ~th C h e rry H~lls Rancho Water and Sanitation District. REC OMMENDATIO N: That the connector•s agreement wbereby Cherry H~11s Water and Sanitation District seeks to obtain sewaae trea~nt service • f rom the C ity of Engle-wood be approved and that both the eonnector•s agreement and the companion agreement whereby Cherrymoor South Sanitation District agrees to transmLt the wast~ater from Cherry Hill s Rancho to the trunk line of the Englewood system through the C ber~oor South outfall line be approved and properly exec uted by the C ity. Respectfully submitted, ENGLEW(X)D WATER AND SEWER BOARD By: L. A. Robohm • Cbai.rm.an Attachment 1 II • • T 32xl - - - - MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTYON OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER &OARD DATE: September 21, 1971 SUBJECT: Re solut~on Oeclar~ng Water Ma~ns Inadequate and Autbor~z~ng Collect~on of Charges for Ne-Installat~ons. RECOMMENDATION: That the C~ty Counc~l adopt a Resolut~on declar~ng the old ~ater ma~ns ~nade quate on the streets and block5 lL~ed below and author~zing the Utilities Deparnnent to collect charges for these changeovers to new and larger mains - i.n accordance w ·i. th schedules establ i.shed by City Counci.1 Resolution dated July 16, 1956, amounting no~lly to $25.00 plus $0 .50 per front foot of property. 900, 2700 2700 3100 3200 3900 4500 1000 ~ 1100 Block on East Amherst Block South Ogden Street Block South Emerson Street Block South Delaware Street Block South Humbo1dt Street B1ock B1ock South Logan Street South Acoma Street Avenue Respectfully subm~tted• ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD Attac.t-:at 2 -- '32xl ~age Ques. no. 2 1 2 2 2 3 3 h 3 s 3 6 3 7 4 8 4 9 4 10 s 11 s 12 6 13 6 1h 7 1S 7 16 8 17 8 18 8 19 8 20 9 21 9 22 9 23 9 2h 9 2$ 10 26 10 27 10 28 10 29 11 .30 11 31 11 32 11 33 12 3h 12 3S 12 36 12 37 12 38 - - - DESIRABLE STANDARDS OF WATER SERVICE The daily ye1.1d of source w ill be adequate for J.O years In we11 supp1y the ground water 1eve1 'i.s stable S ufrace "Vater sup-o1y" storage is adequate Regular bacter~o1ogica1 tests assure p~ty R.aw wat.er :i.s sa..Ce or can be made so · The oubl..i..c understands :i.ts water source Raw v-a:t. .. er :Ls of good quality or can be made so Intake has adequate capacity now Intake ~1 meet capacity needs of near .f'uture Intake ~terrupti..ons cannot hurt se~ce Treatznent capacity is adequate now Treatment Lnterrupti..ons cannot hurt aerv1ce Treat.m.ent na.lcea the w a ter abso1.ute1y .ea£e Treatment pernd..ts delivery of "q~tr" water Treat..l!tent pl..a.nt sta..f"f' i..s adequa.te.l..y traj_n_ed Pumpi.._ng capac:i.ty meets current da.:l...1y req~ements Pumpi..ng capaci..ty meets peak demands Pump~ and storage capacity meet ~ n eeds of near .tuture Booster pumps can meet demands o£ area served Pumpi..ng i..nterrupti..ons cannot hurt s~ce Large mains have adequate e~ze Large mains have adequate 11...1"e expectancy Satisfactory pressure is av~b::J..e to a11 customers In high value d:1.str1..cts~ mains are 'O.roper1y sized In residentia1 districts. ~s are proper1y sized Sma11 ~ns have adequate s~ze Sm.a.11 m.a.ins are l..a.:i.d out and va.l..ved proper1y" ~ mai...ns have l..ong 1.j,_.f'e expectancy Ma.i....ns 3" or l..ess are sever<I!U.y 1im:1.ted i1" used There are suf"f:lcient hydr-ants i.n ~gh va1ue dist.rl_cts There are su.f'fici.ent hydrants :ln reai.dentia.1 areas D:i...atribution storage is adequate £or high 1eve::J.. areas Distribution storage is adequate in main se~ce areas The system is adequatel...y metered A11 customers are metered Meters are accurate Meters are serv':i.ced regu1ar1y There i.s 1..1.ttl..e "nonrevenue" water J,g=>l RATING ~- X ,>S, X X X K ;< X :X x Attach.me.nt rNOI ~ NEEDED 3 x X X X X X -- I' 32X [ - • • • MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD DATE: September 21, 1971 SUBJECT: Proposed Sopplemen t #3 to Connec. tor's Agreement vi. th Sheri.dan Sanitatt.on Di.stri.ct. RECOMMENDATION: That the land described i.n Supplement #3 to our connector's agreement with Sheri.dan Sani.tati.on Distri.ct be approved for inclusion i.n that Di.strict and that sai.d Supplement be approved and properly executed by the Ci.ty. Respectfully submi.tted , ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD By L. A . Robobm • Chai.rman. A.ttac..t..Dt 4 • • - - - - O FFICI AL CITY COI;';::-'CIL C':">OCUM ENT I I I CQj~!~EC'J.'OR r 3 AGR.F.-· ":C"-:.!T C OUr,._ L. • G FJ L..E C~ O F ENGLEWOO D. COLO. THIS AGT".J:E:l.E:tJT , made and entered into this y??S ~ day of .1971, by and bet,,ee:n the CITY OF El''!GLI::t-1000, a munie i pa ~ corporation , hereina fte r re ferred to as "City ••, and CliER..RY II ILLS n.AI.l CiiO l ·JAT ER .1\.ND S J\ll i TAT IO!.T DISTR ICT, A.RAPAJ-JOE COU I1TY , COLOP .. 1\DO , a quas.i-munici.pa 1 cor poration, hereinafter r eferred to as 'Connector ", acting by and t.hrough their du.l.y e1ected , qua1i.ficd , and authorized o ff icers ; \"l i TIIB SSETl-1 : THAT l n!I:REAS , the City h as and is opera ting a s e\·.rage treatment pl.ant , together '"'ith a sewage system capabl e of r eceiving and trea ting the sev.Ta ge \·r.i.th.i.n the service area o f Connector through the trunk 1.i.ne or 1i.nes of Cherrymoor South \·later and Sanitation D i s trict for sewage service t h roug h the sYsten o f the City; and l ·IHI:REAS, th e City If's authorized its dul.y el.cctcd of ficers to make and en t e r into such contracts as may be neces~ary, c onvenient, and proper '\·lith res pect to the c a re and treatment of the se'\·.Tage o f said C o nnec tor under the hereinafter set forth conditions, provided that no such cont r a ct or ~ny supp1emen ta1 agrec.rnen.t or a m endme nt there to sha11 impair or overtax the abi1.ity of the City of Eng1e'-'.TOod to p:r:operl.y c are for and treat the sanitary se\-.Tage furnis hed 1.·.Ti th.i.n the tcrr.i.tor.i.a J. l..im.i.ts o f the City o f E ng1c\·.Tood , Co1orado; I O l:O!, Tiii::P..BFOP..r;, in consideration o f the prern.i.ses a n d for other good a nd v a l.uab.l.e consideration hereinafter set forth , i..t is !nutua11y understoo d and agreed b y and bet\·:ec n the parties as fo11o'--.TS: 1. The City hereby agrees to the cond.i.~ion s hereinafter set forth to trcu.t the SC\·.fage o btain ed · fror::t Conne ctor. Said SC'\·Icr service to b e prov id ed for the sai.d Connector sha 11 provide ,c;v ai.1 ub.i..1ity of service for tl'le fo11o\.,ing des cribed 1 and situa te, l ying , and bein g in the County o f Arapahoe , State of Co1or~do , --I. I' 32 X I - - - to 1.-.1i..t: h l1 as set forth in r:x.h:i.bi.t .]\_u attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as if fu11y set forth; together '~ith feeder 1incs and mains thereto from said terri- tory and a11 addi.t..i..ons and c::onnc cti.ons thereto '\-li.thi..n the: above- descri bed area on1y; arn together with eas ements o f record over and ac ross private property and satisfactory permits for the u se o f pub1i.c r i.ghts of '\·:c::t.y to a point where s a i d Connec tor's 1ine or 1i..nes attach to trunk 1i.nes o perated by Cherrymoor South \·!ater and S ani t a tion D istrict under a val...i..d and existing Connector's Ag reemen t b e tv."een the City of E ng1.e""ood and said Cherrymoor South \·!atcr and Sani..tati.on Di.stri..ct. The Connector sha11 con struct , Qperate, and maintain , at its O'\·rn expense and at no expense to the Ci..ty, a connecting se'\·Ter 1ine or l.i.ne s to a point or points of connection .'\·J'ithin said existing se'\·J'er trunk. 1ine or 1ines of the Cherrymoor South Hater and Sanitation District. In the operation of Connector's sanitary sewer system, the Connector agrees that the specifications of the City sha11 app1y as to the minimum standards for the Connector's system in a11 1ocations . Shou1d the se'\·Tcr 1.i.ne and i.nsta11ation s o perated by the Connector under this Agreement be 1ocated on 1ands other than 1ands dedicated to pub1ic use upon whi.ch se,..J'ers Yna.Y be pl.aced, the Conne ctor cove nants that it '"'J'.il..1 acquire fee ti.tl.e or the appro p riate right of \'#a y or easements, free and c1ear of al.l. l..iens and encumbrances, of the l.and r equir ed for the purpose o£ th e facil..itics to be i nsta11cd hereu~der to the Conne ctor '\·J'i.thout cha r ge to the City. 2. It i s speci.fical..l.y understood bct\-J'een the parties hereto that the Connector ha s entered .into a se pa rate agreement "'J'i.th Chcrrymoor South l ·la ter and Sanitation Vi.stri.ct '\-J'h ereby said D i strict h as agreed to transrx>r t SC\'>Tagc from the Conne ctor • s -2-II . i \ I ~ -- I' 32X • • • • above-described a r ea. through Cherryrnoor South i·:"ater and Sanita- tion District t runJ ~ 1i.nc to the City 's d i sposa l pl..a.n , and that Connec tor's tap sha11 not be c harged against the present a 1l..otment of t he aforesaid D i s trict. It i s further u nO erstood and agreed that no portion of Connector • s se,·.ter 1i.ne , c onstructed or to be con s tructed , "".i.11 be ""'i.th:i..n the boundaries of t he City of Bng1ewood as the same nov1 exist . 3. It i s further agreed t ha t for the purpose o f present and future treutment plant expans ion , the re '\1'7i.11 be a head tap pr connection fee cha rged by the City to the Connector or its assigns, for each rcsi.denti.a1 , ind ustrial, or commercial t ap made within tl~e O i.stri.ct's boundaries. The ch a rge sha11 be the fees in effe ct for sev7er taps outside the City 1irni...ts , and as may be adjusted by the Ci.ty fro m ti.me to time; and t hat '\:'lhen such fees are charged , the Ci.ty sha11 give the Connector thirty (30) days '\-.n::-itte n notice be fore mak.i__ng such c hange. 4. It is further un.dcrs tood and agreed that se'\·.T agc treat- ment charges sha11 be made in accordance with T.i..t1e XV, Chapter 4, Ilu.nic.i.pal.. Code of the City of E ng1e,.,ood, Co1orado, and any past or future a.menc:!~ • ..;:nts thereto. S. The Connector may run se'\o-7age through Connector • s feeder 1i..nc and through the 1ine o f Cherrymoor South ~·:ra ter and Sanitation Di strict, and to the connection '\.·.7i.t.h the Ci.ty •s faci.1i.tics , upon the condition, however, that no gaso1i.ne, oi.1, or other matter that may be detrirnenta1 to the treat ment process emp1oyed by the C ity, nor any store or ground ~a.tcrs, sha11 be permi tted to be discharged into said connecting 1i.ne or 1i.nes ; and provided further that the Connector sha11 at a11 ti.rnes p roper1.y main ta in s a i.d connecting se'\-.rcr 1.i..ne or 1i.ncs (except as ~y be provided for i.n its contract with the aforesaid District and excepting any part of the 1ine ~ithin the corporate 1imits of the C ity); .i.f any discharge e nters sai.d 1inc or 1i.ncs -3 - • • I' 32 X I [ • • contrary to the above l.Lrnitat ions, the Co~ector agrees to proceed at once to do '\•Jhatever is n e cessary to rectify such condition or perform such ma intenance, s _o as to c:::onforTit to t he r equiremen t s o f this paragraph before discharging the same through said connecti ng 1ine or 1ines ; and in c a se of fai.l.ur e promptly so t.o do, after \·."":r i.tten notice thereof, the City may make such r ectification or do such Jna.i.n t ena..nc e \~or1 :. at the expe nse of the Conne ctor , and ~~e C onnector a g r ees to pay the expense of such :rectific ation or maintenance '\-lo:rk _ 1\t any ti.nte \V'hen the City i s r easonabl.y sure of tll.e presence .i.n t1"1e system of any detri~e nta1 discharge i.ncl.udi..ng storm or ground \·.rate r, the City ma y c a 11 for a. te1evi.s.i.on or otl"le.:r type in spection o f d"le ma ins, the cost of such service to be borne by the Connector. 6. It is agreed that .i..n stall.ati.on s '\·!i...l..l. be made according to pl.ans and spec:i..£icati.ons approved by the City, and that the City sha11 ins pect such .i.nsta.l..l.ations and sha.l.l. charge on.l.y the fo.l..l.o'\.·l i.ng for such supervision: 7- (a) An i..~spection fee .i.n accordance with the current inspection fee chargeQ outside the Ci..ty sha1..1. be due and payable concu.rrent.l.y "''.i.th th.e progress of Connecto..-• s con- struction. (b) The Connector spec i..fi..cal.l..y agrees that a.l..l. service connections '\<Jhi..ch are r.1ade to Connector • s se,·rer .l.ine or .l..i.nes at any t.i..me are subject to the supervision and inspection by the City, and that a11 such i.nsta11ati..ons shal.1 con f o rm to the same standards as requi..red '\·rith.i.n the Ci..ty l..i..I!'....i..ts . The Connector agrees that app.l..i.cat.i.on for res.i.denti.a.l., comrner c.i.al., or .i.ndustri..a.l. taps ,.,.i.l..l. be made .i.n accordance ""'.i.th T.i.t1.e XV, Chapter 4, I'iuni..c i.pa 1 Code, '\'llh erei..n :it .i.s stip ul.ated that al.l. appl..i.cations '\·r .i.l..l. be accompa nied by exhib its vrhich c.l.ear.l.y state the anticipated amount , type , and co_ncentra.- ti.on o f sewage to be prod uc ed . Furtl~ermore , the Connector agrees that if thE! City sha.l..l. call. for a c anera :in spect~on prior to the City's acce~tance of the Conne ctor • s SC'\-Ie r 1ines, and an add~- t~on a.1 camera ~n spe ct~on prior to t'\-re.l.via. months after in.i.tial. acceptance of sai.d 1i.nes , the Conne ctor ,.,~11 pay a11 costs for such ins pection_ "j,"'hc Connec tor spc c.i.fi..cal.l.y agrees to prevent se""age I I ~ • • 1'32 X • • • from any area other than that descr~bed herein from being discharged i..nto the Connector • s san itary sc,.7age system connected to the Cherrymoor South \·later and Sanitation Distr ict trunk 1ine , or connec tions to the system from or .:in any area other than that described herein~ except '\-J'i.th uri..tten consent of the City fi.rst being obta ined. Such written consent of the City for service to, or i.nc1usi.on of, any addi.ti.ona1 area, charges for service to tha t area sha11 be due and payabl..c under the same schedu1cs, fe es and amounts set forth i.n this A gree- ment, un1e!3s nc'\·1 rates or fees shal..l.. have been suhseq ue:nt1y establ..i.shed by the City for outside service. B. The Conne ctor agrees to pay the City a treatment charge for the carriage and treatment of the Connector"s se'\.,age del...i.vcred through the l..i.nes of.. Cherryrnoor South llatcr and Sa...ni.t.ati.on District hereinabove referred to. Such charge is hereby deter·m.i.ned to be the charge establ..i.she:d from -t.i..me to tLme by the City for furnishing treatment for taps outside the City l...i.rnits . Such c harge shal..1 be made by the City and shal..J.. be col..J..ected di.rectl..y fro~ the user by the City. .l:t is speci.fica 11y understood, ho'\·.?ever, th.at th.i.s charge is subject to adjustment froo tLme to tLme by the City, and that when such c harge .is changed, the City shal..J.. give the connector thirty (30) days ~~i.tten notice before making such change . The City shal..J.. have the right to refuse to serve and to dis- connect the service to any user in the event of nonpayment of the cha r ge made by the City for services as herein set forth, or, at the o ption of the City, to hol..d the Connector respons.i.b1e £or such charges , and the Connector agrees to pay the same when charged . In the event such service is di s connected by the City for nonpayocnt , the City may charge a reconnect.i.on fee; it is provided a n d agreed, ho'\...rcver, that the Connector shal..1 at al..1 times be rcsponsibl..c for any and a11 fees due the City for treatme nt cha rge s as set forth above, and the Conne ctor '\.,i11 -5- • • T 32X • • • • not permit any reconnecti.on of a d.i.scormectcd service ""it.i."l out f ir st o btai.ni.ng the cons ent of the City . 9. The Ci.ty reserves t he right to :r efus e connec tions upon the Connector 's system , even '\·J'i thin the area herei.n described, '-"1hi.c h the Ci.ty finds '\·!oul..d pl..ace an unnecessary burden thereon or ov er l..o~d or t ax t he c apacity of the faci.l..i.ti.cs of the City . 10. "L'hc term o f thi..s Contract i.s for a period of t w cl..ve (12) years from the date o f execut ion , during vrhi.ch time the Connec tor agrees that a l..l. c:ffl..uent prod uced fro~ t aps '"i.thi.n the Di strict shal..l.. be tre ~t ed by the City and ~he City agrees, .during the t erm hereof, to maintain adequate faci.l..i.ti.e s for trea ting sai.d SC'\..rage . J~exa ti.on of a part or al..l.. of the Di.stri.ct to any COI'nJ'!\u..n.i.ty sha11 not terminate this :!!l..g rcc.rnent as to tl'\e Di..strict or the portion t.~ercof annexed. 11. Connector agrees that it '\•.ti11 mai..ntain at its own expense al..l.. of .its l..ines (except those l..ines 0'\-nl.ed and o perated by Cherrymoor South 1'1ater and Sanitation Dis trict), i.t being specifica 11y agreed that the City assumes no r esponsibil...i.ty if the se'\·.1er as constructed hereu.nder becom.es cl..ogged, damaged, or requires maintenance of any other kind or n ature . 12. T he City ~s providing onl..y se~~ge treatment service hereunder, and on~y by t...'"lis in.d.i.vi.dual.. contract '"ith the Connector and does not by this contract o ffer treatment service except in strict accordance with the terms hereof. This contract does not offer and shal..l.. not be construed as offering SC'\.,age treatment service to the publ..ic general..l..y or to any area outside the J..i.mits of the exterior boundary of the 1ands herein described. 1..3. P..ny viol..ation hereof , or fa.i.1ure to compl..y "'ri.th any conditions herein contained by the Connector or the successor di strict sha11 permit the Ci.ty , ,,.i.th.i.n t e n (10) days after written notice to the Connector or the successor district, and fai1urc to correct the vio1ation or noncornp1.i.ancc, to dis- -6- • • - • • continue service to the area , or at the City's o p tion, to increase th e r a t es for services '\·J i.tJ-.,i.n the area by an amount not to e xceed $5 .00 p e r m onth p e r s e rv.i..c~ conne ction during the period of such v.i..o1ati.on or nonco~p1.i..a nce, and the Con- nector, or D istrict, as the ca s e ~y be, sha11 be financi.a1.l.y respon s ible for sucl"l charges as hcre.i.nbcfore £provided i.n parag raph 8 hereof. 1.4. It is understood b e t'\I Cen the parties that ·this Conne ctor serves a restricted area in present need of sanita ry se,~er servi.de, w h ereas there i.s a much larger area .:i.n the Cherry Hil.l.s Vi.l.l.age-Grec.:n'\"ood Vi...l..l.age area '\'17h.i.ch may necessitate sanitary se'\-~age service fac.i..l..:it:ies .in the fore- seeabl.e future, '\·lith scv1er trunk fa.ci.l.i..t.i..es i.n the natural.. drainage area to the City . Connector agrees to cooperate and j _oi.n. ,,rith any district forr.:ted to provide this ove.r-:-al..l.. service at such t~me as the same i s created. l'liTNESS our hands and sea.l..s the day a..n.d year first above '\·.~ritten- (SEAL ) ATTL ST: Secretary ( S E A L CHEP...P..Y JIILLS RAN CHO WATER AND SP. .. NITATION' DISTRICT, AR.l\.P.l!-.HOE COUN TY, COLORADO By __________ ~Foc~~e~s~1>d~e~n~t~------------------ -7 - \ ! ~ • • 1'32X ~- 1 ~ • LXIIIBI"l' .r. '.1'0 COlJIH:CTOn.' S AGP...ECa .J::UT DETt·lEEN THE CI•.ry 0.!_.. .... E N GL.Cl·:"OOD , A !1.UNICIPP-L CORPOR.ATIOZ.t, AND Cll.Z.:R.RY HILLS l'U\.:'iCHO t ·1ATER Al:D S.1U.-II'l."l\":i"IO:.' ois·..~..~R:rc·r, ARAPA..'-fo.L cou~::Ty , A QUAs r -;u;z.;zczr..oAL conPoi~'l.·ro:LJ . A~1 o£ Cherry B i.11s Ra ncho Subdivision, Lots 1 through 37 , .inclusive, constituting a1 .1 of Cherry H i.1.1 s Ra ncho Subdivision, ~~a pahoe County , Colorado, and Lot s 1 through 7, i.nc1usi.vc, constituting a11 o f t he D . c. Buchanan Subdi.vi.si.on , Acended Plat , Arapahoe County , Colorado . P age 1 • • '32xiC • t::Xlii13I'.i' /"_, Page 2 • \ ! '! • • • ~c·.,~C.JC '"'~-:-o=:::l.l.. p l..a nt o f ~""l.c C .i.ty o ~ Eng l.e'\.·~ood , sta"t:-o o!: C o l..oz-cc:io ; t-~.n.J • • <;:£~;~?-~_£~! ~ ~ Chc-·~.:? J.:...i.l.1 ~.: r ..... · ~:::ho :. ~~~· c o::\ncct j_ !:.s &OV::t.~<:l t-r P n n - \ ! '! • • I' 32 X I [ • • • • U .i.l..l.O l .. :.u·:c:~o ~~.::1 ~::;:: __j.t _; ::;c-: •.:::.c;!O :i.nt-:> C:"l.o =.::-~~Ctor ~r.ou~.h. 'D l.:i..J.'\~J , G \.:.C 1-l c cr:.=-'c~t.io .c ~l"l:-1.1.1 !:::~ :i.n :Jpc ::::::~~a by a r u;>rc.'.:Icn t a ti.~·;;:, o £ 'Lhe: r ci:c.:rcr:.c•_: :i..~ .:t p l.n.t o~ th-:: c:rcn. c.pon '\:hS.c~l t here." .!.o C.::op:1.c-::c d t he c c ::!!-: l..:i.""1..:l :::O and c on1-.cO~ 0:'\::J t o c :;.:..:~.do t..'"l.c ~.c.to i.n. c on - n d £u.r·thc:::: t:: .. h .n t Ch r 1..7 f u :tl. r ._,n pon!'#!.b.:l.3..!..ty f or c u ch !:0 -::!'1. t .-. ..... ~ ch.a.l.l. -2 - II • • I' 32 X I - - t ho ru -:::1 .!!C:t:: .. .r;:;~ o ng:Lncc= o2 C hcrryr.cor So'"..l~. by the C.i.ty o :i: Eng1c,1ood . ZL""'l.d by a11 o!:h.c:: ::tr.JC.nc:.i.o..:J and Quthor:l.ti.c :::: ho.V!...-""l.g j -...u:!.::a.j.ct.i.on -3- • -- I ! :r r 32x I[ - - - - '\-l'i."'..::.hi..n i:.!"!.~.r t:.y (3 0) <J.c-.y~ e..C t ~r r c c c .:!..p t of oa i.d n -::;t i.cc , th.:l::; 7-.grc ::.·-:::nt 6 .:1 t t ho o ·· .!.on o £ C hc =ry:-:o ~r ~ou th , o ~.:l-1..1. t,;:...,~:=cupo n t c.rr ..i..n atc .. ~3. 'Tb ~ a n.....&u ::-..1 ~cr v.:i.c.c c h c...:r gc h ~=e i.n p=ovi.'.dcd :i.::l .:!..n t c -.dcd to c o..,...~c r r..o:::n:..3.1 opc.ra1.:.:1.o=-'-i:l.::'l.':l 'T:'...!l~ntc r_.::l_r':.CC e>:p~n :.;es o n 1 y cr__c:i not ~4. t1honc" .. c.r i..t :i.s. ncccoc c.:::-y, duo to nn ac~ of God , o :r .c.ny t.r .::...!:!::.:~t..o :i..o;'l. 1i..::'!~ ~ouc;h whj_ch co.rv.l.c.c i.s t:'c::L""").!3l":"'rt;.cd u :--td c J...- thc t erns of ~~~s Aqr c~~nt , nnd tl~o cher~e fo~ su:h rcp~ir or n s!:"e3:!::c c..1. by Chc-r..r-yr.::J.or Scu!:h agc..i.n.c:t Cherry ~i11s n.c..nc:ho at t he c ,-• .; t .;._:: ::: :::.::~ !:.l"'\(~ c :u::go,:, a:o:::i e.:::;cc-:1 a.g i:!.in~t o ther c :::;e:rc to p c.r f o_ -'I - \ ! ~ -- r 32x • due to c :i.rcv~n!J t a P c-::.c b '::!'yo n~"'' i.t!l c o n trol., o:: i.f such i.n..:l.h.1..1 :i.ty ~c d ue t o r c 3~ ~~d r.~~~tcn~~~c o£ e ~c 1i n~s , in vh~c h 1 ~~~c~ cv~:1.t:. cc .=:~ c J .l.i.<_; ... 1.:i.o~~ !'::0 11=:..11 b e c ~ :;p::..n..J.c :l d t.:..r i.n ":J -:.:...~c t :t· .<.: :ro - ~~E!~~~ l..G • C :t.crry II.:1.l..1 !l R.:!':':Ch.o .;1.~..:-c:.~:::a, 'tO "CI:c!cr~a.:::.c a. p:o:os-r m ~u.r th c:-: C..(J'".:ooG to n o t!.fy C l 'lcr.ry- tl\.::c!"l ~i.r:.c s ... 1. 7 . ~:..,:: £~.1.1u=c o f C!1.orry H.i ~l..c T!:'l:"tcho to c~nclu:::t eac h r c:a!:on.c.b1c ~n :•:-c-'-=t.:i.o n :::J o:= t o }:.no'\ooO:i.n"J'~Y pc:=n.i.t ur:.,:_ t:.~o:::-.1.:.:-cd p~ on ~to 1incs o hu11 bo grour.dc for t crn~nnti.on o£ nl..l.. £ C h!...=ry l!~l..J..a Ito.ncho's :sc~TCZ" 1 .!.nc:::J, in.sta.l.l..a tJ..o:.'lO, f o.i.l.i - t o:::, r-.r.. =-~~h t b_ .. Ch.c·"":'2:'J"?::':::Or So< .. :.:~ . .t'"t. ~:;'1. n.::::> 'f.::::.:;-r c 1iovcn o.:: ,;-a.:tv.o!l 'tile o bl.i.gt::!:'C.!..cr. .:::;.!"'!a. _c::;-.r:.::::n-:~.::..bi.~ity o~ C hcl:ry !il.11a Ranc;"l.o to i.nopo ct as h c:::n i.n =-ov.!.dc £1::--:;_:.:1."'!'"':0 0~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :? D,!.,Y C t.:T:CL7TY l.SJ . c ~ .. o=r.::.~ J=>= 5-:>u h. i..:::; noi:. a. p';.l.}::>1.1.c u~l.;:!..ty and .!..::s not ~ tho r t.:.i:J .1.J..c Ut.i.l.i t.i..c!: c c . 1 .i.n--:.;. o£ c·\ ··--r~rx ,., ;;,:: south .av.:t.:i...14!!!>l.c t::> C herry 1-!.:Ll..~.o nr =:h.o '!:.c ::= t.l c -;:a .. -~n .. : ·.o:--;;.c.:'"l. c.:! o c-.t.'.:lCJ e to tho i::n g1c-..·cod ...~c--·.:193 pl.an::.. !:or -:;- • • I' 32X -- t o t~c p~0 1~c gcn~=a 11y or to of C1.:.cr.!~· U.:i.l..~G :""~r cho _ c-or:-t h.c..rc!-n . o :J.~c.c5..Li.cu.1.l.y prov.i.. =.-d '!:or 71.. t.hc c .:_'t-y ":: J n~1~ \#~ e><:J ~nJ 5..::: &l:L j cct c.~~o to a C on nee ::.or • t:: r~g-=:-oc r-:o r..t '"'!.. c hc:::-ry 11..1.::!.1-::J r..ench-::J '.:r.:!..t:. ~c c.i.ty o:!! -·~ns 2.c:":.:c:oo..3. o £ Chcr=::,;·;.::>:>r sout-:....'1.. r-}~1.1 bcco::-".c. nul.l. o.r.e. v::>.i.d .:'lt. .any t!.r:.o the c.it:l' o Z Lng1 c-::·ccd di..cconti..n\!c o L:..cc c :-o"::i3 nce o f =.c,.-~gc to be P= cc ~~cU under such Ccnncctor'c ~~cc~~nt . 22. C herry &j.J.l.:::; ~~c-... o c~:.:::t.11. £c::n.!.::.:'l. ~o Ch -:::::~~oo:= South a:r:U to the C.:i.t.y of r:r..g.l.~-ood. a p1.:1t Dhcr.:-:-:1..ng t..."lc .1.cc~t:i.on o f tho p.:=opo.;:;cd ~;:o:::..r~ , .... i.~1.i_n tl1.c ce---...-i.c c e:""ca o~ cl ~a~ry 11:11!.::; J~n!::. o , ~o<;;~-:.:.11 :r ":c-!':i.~ t.: c nu.....-.~ cna .:..c!Ur c.-:;s of ~ch p~ty tap~-ng ~t ~ 1~n~s . 23. f ny d.!..=r:.u t~ or cc-n t....rove::--::r.J ':.1..t..h o :!:" t.i o.-."'l ~~~;;;: - -_,t r t : .. o r..:::!.t.tcr c;.ho.11 ba do.tcm.i.nc.-:5. ~~c.r t..~~ pro...-.r J..-.~.i.o::.· .... of: u ~~ ;-._-::.zr~--a..n r..u co of r-.. rbi.trc~cn , a c cp:r o f ~..-:"'l!.ch i.!l ut.~=--h -:1 :."l:-:::r.:.:to .. _n r ... :a -a a ~.rt ~.~--or, and 't--ho p~r !-'!.:.~ b ~ · ·!...y ~ ... _ ~.;::.n to a b-:>u -.:1 by ou:=n <1.ot:.crr:."t.Lnc. i.cn . ~t :l.o ~.....rt:.. ~= L-~~-:-..:~ ~.£ ~t:. uch n.rb.i.t..r~.t.i.en J..!: a c.ond!.t1.on p%".;!;- t....,_, !?~l..i.ng = br~n.~i.ng o £ ~y !lu.i.t i..n r.::t::~y .._ • ..!,.th. r..:J:::;~""::::t to t J..o l\.9%"'C..:!'-"'1..0 n t . -G - l..av or C.G'!.i.t:.r -• • • • C:.r:.::-',OYCO .... ,. or c re..!.f~_c.J. _,...,!.1., r c .. ..;.u..rn r cco.i.pt rc.c:::~c :::tcd , c.C:.C:.::::c::::s "" to : C hor::-y l ::i~.:t:3 11 :1.~eho 1--.::tc-r z:.nd • co.ni t rti.-:::·n. t>i..~t::::-:~c-.::., r ...rapallo C cl..:.nty , C-:>l..c:r c&o Chcr:rY=".OC-So~tl'l t :ator ~nd Sen ~t ~t~on D~~~ic~ 2 (;. y e-a..ra c c -.. ~on c.1..r.g fr ::-:;"t ~""-.~."'.:!: <l ata hore?f and oh3.11 ou t.o:--t.:.t .i..caJ..~y -7 - II • • T 32X - S"""crcta..ry S E :!'. L • C l!LF..n"".t·':O()R !30U"i."!l t:~T l:R J'\.1-!0 S Z\li :\.~1\·:rr o!l P~GT!!.XCT n 7 ___________ Pre~~·~2J~c~~~t~---------------- C !!ERR-..: ln:: .~ .. s l-!.2\!:cno ~ .. :-.'Z':":~ .1'.::·1D ~--.:!~·r.:. .·::ro:·: o:~:--:·7'".-~CT " 1\I'"..l'\P.l\.l~O::: C OG. -;~y , co-r_.or..-~DO Cy___________ .~~~---------------J?":c.::;£~cnt ·rh a £orcgo:f.ng :F .9-==c~cn t .S..!l .n pp~oved th :i.s -------d a y o f ________________ , 1 9 71 - c'iO~y c_c>.:.< (S EJ",L } -8 - • • • LXHI13IT r ... '1'0 C O :.=t:l..:C'r On • S AGrU::E ~l LH T l::H...:Tl\TEt.: Tl-JE CITY OF E-: .. GLE' . ."OOD , .o""\ I·:UNICIPAL COP-POH .l\!riO::::J , AI D CI-J..Ll"'!R Y HILLS P'J\i~CHO ~·:A."J.'Cll .hl1D SJ\:t IT.l\TION o:rs~rRIC"'.', Ar-.1\.Pl\J-!O:c cou ~TY , .l\ QUASI -:tUNICIPl'\..L C ORPOnA'riOi-i . Al.l. o f Cherry 1-i .i.l.l.s Rancho Subd ivision, Lots 1 tlucough 37~ incl.us .i.vc, con s tituting al.l. of Cherry Hi..l.l.s Rancho Subdivision, Z'.:rapa.hoe County , Col.or ado , and Lots 1 through 7, .i.ncl.us.i.ve, constituting al.l. of the U . E . Buchanan Subd.i.vis.i.on , Arn.cndcd P l.at, Arapahoe County , Co~orado . Page l.. II • • - €} LE._G.E.h..! I? -. - --(:)--E":-l'ST o--\A."-'1-Ic-x..E. ~ SE-vv 8<. -c--~~Z~··~~~)~ < -- -- ·--'II T 32X I - -- .. - CO ~RACf and AGREE~ffi~T SUPPLE!\IEi\.'T No. 3 to SE\•:ER CO ~TRAC"r ~- TillS COi\.'Til.ACT Al.'-10 AGREEI\IEN'T , m ade and entered into by and bct, ... •ccn LC> the Cit.y o£ E _nglo,,.ood _, acting t.hro.ugh its duly authorized l-Jayor and City Clerk, hercina£t.cr r c:Ccrrcd to as the ''City'' and Shcr.idan Sanitation D.i.s t ri.ct 11 qua si-municipa l corporation_, hereinafter referred to as the '"District:"; ~ !.. !:. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :!:. !.!..= \\'l iEREAS,. Glencoe Builders, lnc. on or about the 6th day of !~-lay,. 19 57 entCrcd into an agreement concerning the usc of the E _nglc,.,.ood Sc"'•.agc Treatment Plan-r.; and WH C REAS. said Agreement: provided that additional areas could be in- eluded to usc said facilities ""·ith the ""ri..ttcn consent of the City; and WHEREAS, Glencoe Builders, Inc. duly transferred all of its r_i..ght~ title and interest in and to said Agreement to the District~ second party herein; and l\'I IEREAS ~ c. S. Dunn~ Inc .• the fcc 0\Xner of the tract of land herein- after set fort.h~ has paid the required fees and cl~~ges to the City of ~ng1e wood~ and said tract has been included into the Sheridan Sanitation District by an Order entered on the 28 day of S cot:cn~e:r 1971. by the District Court in and for the County of Arapahoe and State o f Colorado; and l\'llERE/\S~ the District has consented that said Tract of land be in- eluded und er the terms and conditions of the _Agreement dated May 6~ 1957; NO\\' THE RE FORE. :Cor and in consi d e ration of the premises and the mutual covenants of the parties hereto. it i.s h ereby _agreed as £o110h'S : 1 _ The City docs here by consent to the inclusion o.£ the fo110\,•i_ng additiona l areas in Paragraph 1 o:C said Agreement dated Jl.lay 6. 1957., and sa~d Parag raph 1 is hereby amended to include: That p :l rr ot: t.hc NE 1/4 o:£ Sec Lion S,. Township 5 South. Ro.ngc 68 h·cs l. o£ t.h e 6th P .M .• d escribed as fo11ows: CO:OL'lENCl G at a point. ,,..hich is 1165.3 :C c et.., more or less. North and 763.92 .Ccct. Eo s t o£ t..h c Sout.hh·cs t corner of the N -E 1/4 o£ Section 5; th e n ce runn ) n g. E.::tst 11711 _OS Ccct to a point in center of road; -1 - -- I' 32X I - • • thence Northerly 27 1./2 deg. \\'est 95.55 feet along center of ro ad; thence North 1 -.1/4 dcg \•:est 256 feet along center of road to a point; thence Wes1: 425.08 feet to a. point; t:.hencc South 340.07 feet to the point of beginning. Except any part lying with- in r _ight of way for South Cla"y Stre-et. · It is hereby _agreed that all of the terms and conditions of the _Agreement d ated 1'-lay 6, 1957, as here tofore modified by Supple ment 112, sha."11 be applicable to the Tract described in Pa~agraph 1 hereinabove as if set forth in the or_igina1 _agreement. DATED at ~nglewood, Colorado on this 1971. Attest: Sccrct:1ry - 2 - • • 1'32X [ ~- • • \fflE.'l£.r.S , Se c t~on 1 5 .3 .$6 (b ) o.C "Lhc 1-:u.n:::ci.p.-: 1 Code or the C:i.t:r of: EngJ..c\·:ood provides that City Cour>c:i..1 rnL~y con!ltruct a w· "Ler n..ai.n o£' su..i".f":i.ci.ent size t o serve an a rea ::>;cl.-ve d by an i.nadcqua"Le l:i.ne r:hc-, in C o unc i1 ' s o pinion , the present 1 i.n e i3 CAusing an ~1duc hn r dship u pon the users thereo£, or the City and , Wl-!FREllS , C:i.ty Council h as and does hcrcl:-y , dc"Lcrn:inc the J.:i..nes a::: e xisting on 1 J an . )97 1 :i.n the streets listed be1ow w ere/ore inadequ~te and causing undue hardships thereby upon the users thcrcor and upo n the City. Cf.-1 , THE!l.EF'O!t..~, Et:' IT R~OLVED , BY TH~ CITY coe••CTL 0? :rHF crrv OF El"lGLE.·J:'OD, COL()RJ. _ , that. a.J..1 service conr..cct..i.ons t..o the ol.d 1 i.ncs :i.n t.he f'o11o,rinc 1oc at:i.ons t hat.. have not a.lre£dy b een cha n ecd over to adequate City m ains sho ~d be char.eed ov e r as s oon as p o s~:ib:l.e , that ch :=o r ge:s f:or aJ.J. ch anee- over ~ acco ~l:i.shcd i ~ t.he l..oc ot..ions e numer a t ed be1o~ be made in eccordanc c w~th the s C:hedu1es est.abJ1.shcd by C:i..t".y Council. by ro s o1ution dated July 16, 1956 , and t hat th ~ saMe be co11ected b y the utilities Depnrtmer.t of the C~ty : A TTEST , 900 , 1000 ~ 1100 3 1oc k on East Amherst Ave n ue 2700 BJ.ock Sout.h O bden S treet 2700 Block ~outh Emer son Street · 3100 B J.ock S o uth Cel.aware S tree t 3 200 Block S out.h Hl.l.!nboJ...dt S treet 3900 I3J..ock on Sout h Loean Street L.500 Bl.ock South Acoma Street BY·---------,~~:n~y~o==r---------------------- City C~erk Treasurer I , StcQhen A . Lyo n , City Clerk-Treasurer o£ the City or Englewood , do hereb y certi.£y that the above and .f"'ore?oine 1..s tr ue , accu~ate and com p :l.ete c ooy of a r eso 1utj~on ador-ted 1-:y the C i ty Cou..,c1.1 of' the City o:f" Englewood at 1ts r cgul.nr rn ee t~r>g o-, the ___ day , o£ 1971 . • • - - • • • !Jl...•r.VL".t. , • • ~ •t:" vrr r f ~ ·-~r - • CZO.U NCIL e:tTY O F L Locl.'\"._ r :.. ~ .... • :1 C'••::u:._-c c .L JJ .169 9 W . ,,j .. • Jc..L n.l BOL.i..!.t. -.. t r "i L~t t1 o t nn , Co~ r~Ju !_>e ar K e n: 1'~, -:..:._--:;/ M ountain Bell It wou1d appe ar zucs t ~onaulu L o mo tha t t hu C ~t\· wou 1 d ~c a bl e t:o u s~ t h J s o rdi nance t o r •"gu l ate our Comp.:u y ~n any manne r. olO W C V t."r, o avoid th~ pos.::;i.bi1i.ty t..ha · :..'>um•.!tu..~dy :night aLt ~m p t t.o ons t:.rt...u ~t L o oe appl.i cab l.e>-·o o r C o mpany , I w ou l.d sug g es t. t:.~a w e a t te m~_..> t o add t h .f ol.1ow t.uy ~ec t.i on u n d r ''9 -8 -.1.8" .:ls .:1 nt...!'·Jto· ::i ~~;:_o ~r e a U..,.:a s t:o1 l o,.,.s:( ~ ·• (~ :-.one o f t i ... p rOV:J.S 100S o f t hl.S cJl apt:.c ..r ( / /'.J' sh c:-11 .:Ap ply t o ~n y l>u .:3 ~n c ss firm , c:orpor..:t.--(0 C /Q -/~' ti.o n o r o t.hcr co nunc rc ..Lal. enti. ty wh~ch .1.s • r c gulat.~d b y th ~ Pu 1~c U t1l.~ti e s Cornm..L s s~on ~q .. o !' L hc "tate o f C ol.o r.ado . •• I wi.11 1 c av p 1 t o y ou a s t o ~h at is t h e ~e s t ~p p roach t o the City ; Lu t:. I t h .i t~IO. y ou s houl d mak e i.t c1<..:a.c L u them that, i.n any evL:"nt, ._~e do not feel t l..::tt we ""''Ou.1d be su bject to their r egu.l.ati.o n ...1nd e r hi.s orrl i.r .a.n c e, ""'·hcther or not they amend, but w e think. ..J..t i.s p r ~f"c ra b ]e o s p c ~1 the matt e r o ut and uvo .1.d any pos s.il.>1 c future conf l.l.c l f you have any qu e stio ns, p1e as c <..:.:~.11. DGS:ca • , • • II r 32x [ - - - - - - INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN KREILING coU~~~G~E ~~0 BY AUTHORITY O RDINA 1 CE NO. SERIES OF 1971 AN ORDINANCE Al-1ENDING TITLE IX (LICENSES AND PERMITS) G t--\...E. ooo. coLO OF "l.'HE '69 E.M.C . • BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER THERETO , ENTITLED CHAPTER 8 , "POLICE AND FI!'.E ALARM SYSTEMs ·•; ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AND CONTROLS FOR POLICE AND FIRE ALARM DEVICES, PROHIBITING THE CONNECTION OF SAID D EVICES TO PUBLIC PRIMARY TELEPHONE TRUNK LINES • AND REQUIRING THE LICENSING T HEREFORE . B E IT ORDA I~~D BY THE C ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO: Sect ion 1. That the 1969 E n glewo od Municipal Code is h ereby amended by adding a n e w chapte r to Title IX~ being Ch apter B, Article III, Title IX, which new chapte r re ads as follows: Police and Fire Alarm Syste ms Purpose -'11-t e purpose o£ this Chapter is to· establish standards and controls of thos e various types of Intrusion, Hold-up, Fire, and oth e r emergency signals from Police and Fire Al arm De vices that require emergency response, inves- tigation and safe-guarding of property or life at the loca- tion of an event reported by and a signal transmitted, t:elephone rl, radioed or otherwise r e 1ayed to th e po1ice~ fire or other d es ignated communications representative d .e partn"le:nt by an A1arm Device or by any person~ acting i .n respons e to a signa1 actuated by an A1arm Devic e. Legis1ative ~ .. ~ The Counci1 h e r eby dec1ares that the 1egis1ative in - tent of this Chapter is to app1y its provisions to any bu siness ~ firm~ corporation~ or oth e r comme rcia1 entity engaged in the business of owning, op e rating~ maintaining~ insta11ing or se11ing Emergency A1arm D e vice or Devices, a Di a 1 A 1arm D e vice ~r Devices, or a system of Po1ice and/or Fire Al arm D e vices or D1a1 A1abm D e vices d es ignated to summon po1ice and/or the fire d e partme nt to any 1oca- tion in respon se to a s igna 1 or other transmission gener- ated or produced by suc h d evices . Definitions For the purposes o.f this a.rtic1e ~ the fo11owing d efinitions sha11 app1y: (a) Ern~rgency A1arm D e vic e -Any d e vic e which, w hen ac t u a.tcd by a criminal a.c t or oth e r emergency -1- • -- [ - • - • • requiring po1ic e and/o r fire d e par~m e nt r e spon se , tran s - mit s a p re -re co rde d m essage or o t h e r sig na1 by t e 1 e phone , radio or oth e r m ean s t o a C e ntra1 A1 a rm Station or dire ct1y to th e Po1ic e -Fire Comm unic a tion s C e nte r, or produc e s an audib1c or visua 1 sig n a 1 d e sig n e d to notify p e rson s within audib1e or visible range of th e signa1. (b) Ho1d-up A1arm -Any Eme rge ncy Alarm Device ac - tuated by ho1d -up or robbery at a specific location; or actuate d by a victim of a ho1d -up or robbe ry at a spe cific 1ocation. (c) Dire ct A1arm -Any Emerge ncy A1arm Device con- necte d dire ct1y by 1eased telephone wires from a specific location to the Po1ice -Fire Communications Center. (d) Centra1 A1arm Station -Any faci1ity operated by a private firm that owns or 1eases a system of any Emergency A1arm Devices,. which faci1ity i s manned at a11 times by trained operators emp1oyed to rece ive ,. record and va1idate a1arm signa1s and to r e1ay information about such va1idated signa1s to the Po1ice -Fire Communication s Center when appropriate. _ (e) Oia1 A1 arm -Any Emergency A1arm Device which is a t e1ephone d evice or te1ephone attachment , that auto - matic a11y or e1ectronic a11y se1ects a t e 1ephone 1ine con- nected to a C e ntra1 A1arm Station or Po1ice -Fire Communi - cations C enter reproduces a pre-recorded message to report a crimina1 act or other emergency requiring po1ice or· fire department response. (f) A1arm Insta11ation --Any Emergency A1arm D evic e or aggregation of Emergency A1arm Devices insta11ed on or within a sing1e bui1ding or on or within ~~-e than o ne bui1ding or area adjacent1y 1ocated on a common site,. at a specific 1ocation. (g) Intrusion -Any entry into afl area o r bui1ding equipped with one or more Emergency A1arm devices by any person or obj ect whose entry actuates a Po1ice A1arm Devic e . (h) Permittee -Any business,. firm,. corporation,. or other commercia1 entity that is engaged in the business of owning,. operating ,. maintaining,. insta11in g or se11ing Emerg ency A1arm D e vice or Devices,. a Dia1 A1arm Device or D e vic es or a system of Po1ice and/or Fire A1 arm D evices or Dia1 A1arm Devices; which business,. firm,. corporation or other commercial enti ty is,. as owner , operator ,. main- tenance service ,. insta11er or seller of said -d evice ,. de- vices, or system of devices, subject to the permit re- quireme nts of this Chapter. -2- • • • [ - • • • • (i) Fal se Ho1d up Al a rm -Any signal actuated by a Hold-up Al a rm t o ~hich the police r e spond~ which is not the r e sult of a hold-up or robbe ry. (j) ~ -The Supe rvisor of Communications. (k) Po1i c..· ,.~ire Communications Center -The police and/or fire-cOt t nicat:ions facilities and other enc losu res hou sing privatc-J y or pub1ic1y owned equipmen t or facilities serving the police or fire communications operations. Permit Reguired It sha11 be un1awfu1 to operate , maintain , insta11 or se11 Emergency Al arm Devices without first obtaining a permit therefore . Except as hereinafter provided , it sh a11 be un1awfu1 for any business ,. firm,. corporation o r oth er commercial en tit y to operate ,. maintain ,. i.nsta11 o r se11 Emergency Alarm Device or De v~ces. a D~a1 A1 arm D ev~cc or D e v~c cs or System of Emergency A1arm D e v~c es o r D~a1 A1a~n D ev ~c es as def~ned by the terms of th~s Chap t er . Superviso r A uthorized to Gran·r: a Permit The Supervisor is h e reby authorized to g r ant a re - voc ab1e 1icense o r permit: to any business , firm, corpora- tion. or other commercia1 e ntity authorizing said business , firm, corporation or othe r comme rcia1 entity to do business in the City of Eng1e..:..Tood by performing a ny or a.11 of the fo11o~ing fun ctions: (1) own. (2) ope rate , (3 ) maintain. (4) insta11. or (5) se11 Eme rgency Alarm Device or D evices . a Di a1 A1 arm Device or Devices or a System of Emergency A~a rm De vices or Dia1 A1arm D evices . App1ic a tion For Permit Any busine ss. firm. corporation or other comme rcia1 entity th at is engaged in the business of owning. operating. maint aining , insta11ing or ~e11ing an Emergency A1arm Devic e or D e vices . a Di a1 A1arm D evice or D ev1 c es . or a System of Emerge ncy A1arm Devices or Di a1 A1 arm D evice s sha11 s u bmit in writing an app1ication for said permit to the Supervi s or. Such app1ication sha11 contain speci.fic provisions re1ati.ng to testing procedures; to the ski11 and competency of the app1icant: to be a permittee; to the qua1ity. efficiency, and effectiveness of the Emergency A1 arm Device or Devices , Ho1d-up A1arms . Dia1 A1a rms or A1 arm Insta11ation owne d or to be operated . main t aine d, insta1 1 ed or so1d by th e app1 i- c ant:; and t:o suc h oth e r informat ion a.s t:he Su pervisor sha11 f ind reasonab1y necessary to e ffectuat e t:he purpose of this Ch apter. Permittee Fee A permittee unde r this Chapte r sha11 pay an annua1 f ee .:.3 - i+ • • r 32x [ - • • • • of Twenty-Five Do11ars ($25.00) to the Director of Finance, ex officio City C1erk-Treasurer of the City of Eng1ewood. Suspens~on or Revocation of Permit A 1icense or permit i ssued under this Chapter may be sus pended or revoked by the Supervisor after notice and hear ing the reon for the vio1ation of any of the provisions of this Chapter or of any regu1ation or regulations as pro- mulgated by the Supervisor pursuant to this C hapter. Gene ra1 Provisions Limitation. No Emergency Device which transmits a pre-recorded message or other signa1 directly to the Po1ice- Fire Communications Center sha11 be connected to or be p er- mitted to use a pub1ic primary trunk 1ine of the City. 9-8-l.O. Fa1se Ho1d-up Al arn1s Ch arges . Any us er of services or equipment furnished by a p ermit te e under this Chapte r sha11 pay to the City a charge of Fifty Do11ars ($50.00) for each of every Fa1se Ho1d -up A1arnts to which the police respond. 9-8-l.l.. Change of Location If th e 1ocation of either or both the po1ice and fire communic~tions facilities shou1d be changed at any ti me ~ permit L ees under this Cha pter sha11 not charge or attempt to charge the City of Eng1ewood with any resulting cost of moving Emergency A1arm Systems or any part thereof. 9-8-1.2 . In s ta11ation and Maintenance Costs A11 costs and recurring charges as the resu1t of installat ion and maintenance of systems permitted by this Ch apter in the Police-Fire Communications Center sha11 be borne by the permittee. 9-8-1.3. Removal of Un1awfu1 Equipment In addition to any other reme dy provided by 1aw~ the Su pervi sor may~ wh enev er h e sha11 have knowle d ge of the use of any cabine t~ d e vic e or attachment~ or t e1e - phone terminal not o perated or maintained in ac cord ance with the provisions of this Ch apter ~ or contrary to r egu - l ations promu1gated pursuant to this Ch ap ter~ after notic e and hearing~ orde r the removal o f th e same from the Police- Fire Communica tions Cente r and it sha11 b e un1a"l:v-fu1 to d~sobcy such orde r. Ru1 es and Re gu1ati ons The Supervisor may promulgate reas onable ru1e s and -4- • • • r 32x - - - - regu1ations that may b e n ecessary for the purposes of assuring the qua1ity~ efficiency and effectiveness of Eme rgency A1arm D e vic es ~ Ho1d-up A1arms, Dia1 A1arms and A1arm I ns ta11ations owned, operate d, maintained, in sta11ed, or so1d by a permittee under this Chapter; and of administering and enforcing the provisions of this Ch apter . Copies of said Ru1es and Regulations sha11 be on fi1e in the Office of the Director of Finance, ex officio City C1erk -Treasurer. 9-8-15. Spec ia1 Provisions (a) Centra1 A1arm Stations Systems -The Supervisor is h e reby authorized to prescribe the location and th e manner of insta11ation of a private or a r egu1ar business te1ephone 1ine insta11ed in the Po1ice -Fire Co~unic a tions Center from a C en~ra1 Alarm Station for ~he express pur- pose of providing direct ~e1ephone communications between a p ermi tte e and the Police-Fire Communications Center to report: a po1ice and/or fire alarm. 9 -8 -16. Direc t: Alarm Systems The Supervisor is h e r e by authorized to pres cribe the location and the manner of installation of a11 cabinets , acc~ssori es , connections and equipment of an approved Direct Alarm System within the Police -Fire Communications Center for the purpose of providing a Direct Alarm S ystem, where the visible and audible signals the refrom may be readily seen and heard by police and/or fire communications personnel . 9 -8 -1 7 . Dial Alarm Systems The Supervisor 1~ hereby auth o rized to p r escribe t he l o cation and the manner of installat ion of all c onnectio ns a n d equipment of a private secondary tele phone l ine wi thin t he Police -Fire Communications C e nter f o r the purpose o f providing a Dial Alarm System. (a) The Supervisor is hereby a u thorized to d etermine whether space for Dial Alarm Syste~s is availab le withLn the Police-Fire Commu~ications C enter. 9-8-1 8 . Exce ptions (a) None of the provisions of this Chapter shall apply to a Police Alarm D evice or Devices installed in a mot or v ehicle or trailer. {b) None of the provisions of this Chapter shall applY to any of those Dire ct: Alarm Systems which are curre nt:1y in s ta11cd w:ithin the existing police or fire faciliti es unt:i1 such communication facilities are re - quired · to b e physically moved or relocated _ =· --~ "'L""c4 G2?.,...,,.-.d .t77--<!!'~~~7'~~ Lff~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~-!!..?~~-.-c~~ ~~ --e~~....-..,~ ..e ~ u~ ~ ~~-.,;.-d -6?~ /%?:&?, ~..........,_-. 'f cz:; ~ ~ ~ •• -- 1'32X [ - - • • • 9-8 19. Signals Originating Out side Corporate Limits Th e provisions of this Chapter shall apply to a11 Emergency Alarm Devices whose signal originates outside the corporate limits of the City of Englewood , provided that said signal terminates wi...t:hin the Engle"t..:rood Police - Fire Communications Center. 9-8 20. Severability If any part or parts of this Chapter are for any reason h eld to be invalid, such decision shall not affe ct the valid ity of the remaining portions of this Ch apter . Introduced , read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the 20th day of September, 1971. I Published as a Bi..11 for an O rdinance o n the 22nd day of September, 1971. Read by t itle and passed on final r eading o n the ______ _;day of 1971. Published by t:i...t:1e a s Ordi_n_a_n_c_e __ N_o_._-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-~1_9~7,1 s_ eries of 1971 on the d ay of Mayor Attest:: ex officio City C1erk I ~ Stephen A. Lyon~ do h e r e by c e rtify that the and for•~.,!;oi n g is a tru e ~ accurate and comp1ete copy an ordinance~ passed on fina1 r eading and pub1ished t it1e as Ordinance No. ~ Series of 1971 . -6- above of by -• I' 32 X I [ - - • • ---- • • •• G F\\.....-E c.oU f'...t......•--,;_...,..,o '"oo. c.o'-o.. c·rr~ oF ENG'- INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN KREILING . BY AUTHORITY O RDINANCE NO. AN O~INANCE AMENDING TITLE IX (LICE NSES AND PERMITS) OF THE '69 E.M.C . • BY ADDING A NEW CHAPTER THERETO, ENTITLED CHAPTER 8 • "POLICE AND FI P.E ALARM SYSTEMS"; ESTABLISHING STANDARDS AND CONTROLS FOR POLICE AND FIRE ALARM DEVICES • PROHIBITING THE CONNECTION OF SAID D E VICES TO PUBLIC PRIMARY TELEPHO~~ TRUNK LINES, AND REQUIRING T HE LICE NSING T IIE REFORE. BE IT ORDAI NE D BY THE C ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO : Sec.tion 1. That the 1969 Eng1e,;V'ood Municip a 1 Code is hereby amended by adding a new chapter to Tit1e IX, being Chapte r 8, Artic1e III, Tit1e IX, which n e w chapter r eads as fo11ows: Po1ice and Fire A1arm Systems Purpos e -The pur pose of this Chapter is to estab1ish standards and contro1s of those various types of Intrusion, Ho1d-up, Fire , and oth er eme r genc y signa1s from Po1ice and Fire A1arm D e vices that require emergency r esponse, inves- tigation and sa£e -guarding of property or 1ife at the 1oca- tion of an event reported by and a signa1 transmitted, t e1ephoned, radioed or oth e rwise r e 1ayed to the po1ice, fire or other designated communications repre sentative qepartment by an A1arm Device or by any person, acting in respons e to a signa1 actuated by an A1arm Device. Legis1ative ~~~ The Counci1 hereby d e c1ares that the 1egis1ative in- tent of thi s Chapter is to app1y its provisions to any busin ess , firm , corporation, or other commerc ia1 entity engaged in the business of owning, operating, maintaining , insta11ing or se11ing Eme r gency A1arm Device or Devices, a Dia1 A1arm Device or Devices , or a system of Po1ice and/or Fire A1arm D e vic es or Dia1 A1 arm Devices d e signated to summon po1ice and/or the fire d epartment to any 1oca- t::i..on i.n r esponse to a signa1 or ot:her transmission gener - ated or produced by such d e vices _ Definitions For the purpos es of thi s art:ic1e , the £o11owi.ng d efinitions sha11 app1y: (a) Emergency A1arm D e vice -Any device which, whe n a.c tu ated by a critni..na1 act: or othe r emergency -l.- • ·- • • I' 32 X It: - • • • • r e quiring p o1ice and /or fi re d e p a r~me nt r esponse 7 trans- mit s a pre -re co r d ed message or othe r signa1 by t e 1 e phone . radio or oth er m eans t o a C e ntr a 1 A1 arm Sta tio n o r dire ct1y to th e Po1ice -Fire C ommun i ca t ions C e nte r, or pro duc e s an audib1e or vi..sua1 s i.g n a 1 d e sig n e d to notify pers ons within audib1e or vis i.b1e r ange o f t:h e signa 1 . (b) Ho1d -up Al.a rn~ -Any Eme r gency A1arm D e vice ac- tuated by ho1d up or robbe ry at a specific 1ocat:ion; or actuate d by a victim of a ho1d -up or robbe ry at a spe cific 1ocat:i.on. (c) Dire ct A1 a rm -Any Eme rge ncy A1arm D e vice con- necte d dire ct1y by 1ease d te1ephone wires from a spe cific 1ocat:ion to the Po1ice -Fire Communications Center. (d) Centra1 A1arm Station -Any faci.1i...t:y ope rated by a private firm that owns or 1eases a system of any Emergency A1arm Devices~ which faci1ity is manned at a11 ti~es by trained operators emp1oyed to receive~ record and va1idate a1arm signa1s and to re1ay information about such va1idated signa1s to the Po1ice-Fire Communications Center when appropriate . . (e) Dia1 A1arm -Any Emergency A1arm Device which is a te1ephone device or te1ephone attachment ~ that auto - matica11y or e1ec tronic a11y se1ects a te1ephone 1ine con- n ected to a Centra1 A1arm Station or Po1ice -Fire Communi - c ations C enter r eproduces a pre -recorded message to report a crirnina1 act or other emergency requiring po1ice or• fire deparOment response. (f) A1 arm Insta11ation ·-Any Emergency A1arm Device or aggregation of E~erge nc y A1arm Devices insta1 1 ed on or ~ithin a sing1e bui1ding or on or within ~~Le than one bui1ding or area adjacent:1 y 1ocated on a common site~ at a specific 1ocation. (g) Intrusion -Any ent ry into an area or bui1ding equipped ~th one or m .ore Emergency A1arm d e vices by any person or object whose entry actuates a Po1ice A1arm Device . (h) P e rmittee -Any busine ss. firm. corporation , or othe r con~e rcia1 entity that is engaged in the business of ownin g ~ op e r a ting~ mai n t a inin g ~ ~nsta11ing or se11ing Emergency A1 a nn D e vice or D e vic es ~ a Dia1 A1arm Device or D e vice s or a system of Po1ice and/or Fire A1 arm Devices or Dia1 A1arm D e vice s ; which business~ firm. co rporation or oth e r conune rcia1 entity is. as own er ~ o p e rator ~ main- tenance s e rvice , insta11cr or se11er of said -device ~ d e - vices , or system of devic e s ~ subj ect ·~o the permit re - quire m e nts of this Chap~e r . -2- • • • r ~2xiC • • • • (i) False Hold-up Alarm -Any signal actuated by a Hold-up Alarm to '\"11hi.ch the police respond,. which is not the result of a hold -up or robbery. (j) Supervisor -TI~e Supervisor of Communications. (k) Polic e -Fire Communications Center -The police and/or Lire communications facilities and othe r enc lo sures housing privately or publicly O'\~ed equipment or facilities serving the police or fire communicat ions ope rations. Permit: Required It sha11 be unlawful to ope rate , maintain, install or sell Emergency Alarm Devic es without fir st obtaining a p ermit therefore. Except as h erein after provided, it shall be unlawful for any business , firm, corpora tion or other cornme rci a1 entity to ope rate, maintain, in stall o r s e ll Emergency A 1arm D e vice or D e vice s. a D~a1 A1arm D e vic e or Devices or System o f Emergency A1 arm D e vic es or Dia1 A1a rm D e vic es as defined by the terms of this Chapte r. Supervisor Authorized to Grant a P ermit The Supe rvisor is h e r eby authorized to grant a re- vocab1e 1icense or permit to any bu s iness . firm. cor por a- tion,. or other conunerci.a1 enti·ty authorizing said business ,. firm,. corporation or other cornmerci.a1 entity to do business in the City of Eng1ewood by performing any or a11 of the fo1~owin g functions: (1) own,. (2) operate. (3) maintain. (4) insta11,. or (5) se 11 Emergency A1arm Device or D evic es . a Di.a1 A1arm D e vic e or D evices or a System of Emergency A~arm D e vices or Dia1 A1arm D e vic es . App1ic ation For Permit Any busines s . firm,. corporation or other comme rcia1 entity that is engage d in the business of owning,. ope rating. maint aining ,. in sta11ing or ~e11i.ng an Emergency A1arm D e vice or D e vices ,. a Di.a1 A1 arm D e vice or D evices ,. or a System of Emergency A 1arm D evices or Dia1 A1arm Devices sha11 submit in writing an a pp1ica tion for said p erml t to the Supervisor. Su ch app1icati.on sha11 contain specific provisions re1ati.ng to testLng procedures ; t o the s ki.11 and compe tency of the app1i.cant to be a permi t tee ; to the qua1i.ty,. efficiency,. and efCectiveness of the Emergency A1arm D e vice or Dev ices . Ho1d -up A1arms ,. Di.a1 A1 a~s or A1arm Insta11ation owne d or to be o perat:e d. maintained . in s ta11ed or soLd by t:he app1i.- c ant ; and to such oth e r information as the Supervisor sha11 find reasonab1y n ecessary to effectuate the purpose of this Chapte r. P errni.tt:ee Fee A p ermittee under this Chapter sha11 pay an annua 1 fee .:.3- • • T 32 X --~----~--------------~--------~----~----------- • - - • • of Twenty-F~ve Do11ars ($25.00) ex of ficio City C1erk-Treasurer • to the Direc tor of Finance, of the City of Eng1ewood. Suspension or Revocation of Permit A 1icense or permit issued under this Chapter may be suspended or revoked by the Supervisor after notice and he aring thereon for the viol ation of any of the provisions of t:hi...s Chapter or of any regu1 a t:ion or regu1at:ions as pro- mu1gat:ed by the Supervisor pursuant to this Chapter. Gencra 1 Provisions Limitation. No Emergency Device which transmits a pre-recorded message or other signa1 direct:1y to the Po1i...ce - Fire Communications Center sha11 be connecte d to or be per- mitted to use a pub1ic primary trunk 1i...ne of the City. I 9-8-10. Fa1se Ho1d -up A1arms Charges . Any user of serv~ces or equipment furnished by a permittee under this Ch apter sha11 pay to the C~ty a ch arge of Fifty Do11ars ($50.00) for each of every Fa1se Ho1d-u p A1arms to which the po1ic.e respond. 9-8-11. Ch ange of Location If the 1ocation of either or both the po1ice and fire commun ications faci..1~ties shou1d be changed at any ti..~e , permittees under th~s Ch apter sha11 not charge or attempt to charge the City of Eng1ewood with any resu1ti..ng cost of moving Emergency A 1arm Systems or any part thereof. 9-8-12. Insta11ation and Maintenance Co sts A 11 costs and recurring ch arges as the r esu1t of insta11 ation and maintenance of systems permitted by this Chapter in the Po1ice -F~re Communications C enter sha11 be borne by the permittee _ 9-8-1 3. R emova1 of Un1a,;v-fu1 Egu~pment In addition to any other remedy provided by 1aw, the Superv~sor may, wh e n ever he sha11 have know1edge of the use o£ any cabinet , d e vice or attachment , or te1e- phone termina1 not operated or maintained ~n accordance -~th the prov~s~ons of th~s Ch a pter. or contrary to regu- 1ations promu1gatcd pursuant to th~s Chapter, after notice and hearing , order the remova1 of the same from the P o1ice - Fire Commun~cat:i..ons Center and it sha11 be un1Sl.V'fu1 to disobey sucl~ order . Rules and R egu l at:ions The Supervisor may promu1gat:e rcasonab1e ru1es and -4- ··--------------------------~----~~----------------· ..... • • r 32x - - • • • regu1at~ons Lhat may be necessary for the purposes of assur~ng the qua1~t:y, eff~c~ency and effe ct~v eness of Emergency A1arm Devices, Ho1d-up A1arms , Dia1 A1arms and A1arm Ins ta.11ations O'tvrted, operated , maintained, insta11ed , or so1d by a p ermittee und er this Chapter; and of administering and enforcing the provisions of this Chapter. Copies of said Ru1es and Regu1at:ions sha11 be on fi1e in th e Office of the Director of Finance, ex officio City C1erk-Treasurer. 9-8-15. Specia1 Provisions (a) Cent:ra1 A1arm Stations Systems -The Supervisor is hereby authorized to prescribe the 1ocation and the manner o1 in s t:a11at:ion of a private or a regu1ar business t:e1ephone 1ine inst:a11ed in the Po1ice-Fire Communications Center from a Centra1 A1arm Station for the express pur- pose of providing direct te1ephone communications between a permittee and the Po1ice -Fire Communications C enter to r eport a po1ice and/or fire a1a~- 9-8-16. Direct A1arm Systems The Supervisor is hereby authori~ed to prescribe the 1oc ation and the manner of insta11ation of a11 cabinets. acc~sso ries, connections and equipment of an approved Direct A1arm System within the Police -Fire Communication s C enter for the purpose of providing a Dire ct Alarm System , where the visib1e and audib1e signa1s therefrom may be re adi1y seen and heard by po1ice and/or fire communications p e rsonne1 . 9-8-17. Dia1 Alarm Systems The Supervisor i s h ereby authorized to prescribe the 1ocation and the manner of insta11ation of a11 connections and equipment of a private secondary telephone 1ine ~thin t he Po1ice -Fire Communications C enter for the purpose of provi ding a Dial A larm System. (a) The Supervisor is h e r eby authorized to d etermine whether space for Dia1 A1arm Systems is avai1ab1e '..;rithin the Po1i.cc-Fire Communications Center. 9-8-18. Exceptions (a) None of the provisions of this Chapter sha11 app1y to a Police Ala~~ Device or Devices insta11ed in a motor vehicle or trai1er . (b) None of the provisions of this Chapter sha11 app1y t:o any of tJ"losc Direct Al.arm Systems which are currcnt1y in s ca11.ed within the existing po1ice or fire faci1i.tics unti1 such communication faci1it:i.es are re - quired to be physica11y moved or re1ocated~ -5- • • - • • • • 9-8-19. S~gna1s Originating Out side Corporate Limits The provisions of this Chapter sha11 app1y to a11 Emergency A1arm Devices whos e signa1 originates outside the corporate 1imits of the City of Eng1e~ood 7 provided that said signa1 t erminates within the Eng1ewood Po1ice- Fire Communication s Center. 9-8-20. S e vera.b i~ity If any part or parts of this Chapter are for any reason he1d to b e inva1id, such decision sha11 not . affect the va1idity of the re~aining portions of this Chapte r . Introduc ed , read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the 20th day of September, 1971. Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the 22nd day of September, 1971. Read by tit:1e and passed on fina1 reading on the _______ day of 1971. Pub1ished by ti.t:1e as Ordi._n_an_c_e __ N_o_._-_-_-_-_-_-_--, 1 ,.., 9 , 7 • 1 . S. eries of 1971 on the day of _ Mayor At~est: ex officio City C1erk I~ Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and for e~oing is a true, accurate and comp1ete copy of an ordinance~ passed on fina1 reading and pub1ished by tit1e as Ordin ance No. ,. Series of 1971 . -6- II • • r 32xl( - I - • • • • INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING A UTILITY EASEMENT LYING AND BEING WITHIN THE SNOWBARGER SUBDIVISION • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. WHEREAS, there present1y exists a Uti1ity Easement 1ying and being within the Snowbarger Subdivision of the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado; and WHEREAS, said Uti1ity Easement no 1onger serves any usefu1 purpose; and WHEREAS, the P1anni~g and Zoning Commission of the City of Eng1ewood has heretofore recommended that said Uti1ity Easement be vacated. NOW • THEREFORE • BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as fo11ows: 1. That the fo11owing described Uti1ity Easement 1acated within the City of Eng1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado be and the same is hereby vacated, to-wit: (a) Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 3, SNOWBARGER SUBDIVISION. 1ying ~n the SE-1/4 SE-1/4 of Section 4, TSS, R68W; thence east a1ong the south 1ine of said Lot 3, 8.0 feet to the true point of beg~nning; thence north and para11e1 to the west l~ne of said Lot 3, 8.0 feet; thence east and para11el to the south 1ine of Lot 3, 182.0 feet; thence south and parallel to the east 1ine of Lot 3, 8.0 feet to a point on the south 1ine of Lot 3; thence west along the south 1ine of Lot 3, 182 .0 feet to the true poLnt of beginning. This vacation does not include the ~ater 1ine easement as recorded in Book 924, Pages 207 -209 & 211 of Arapahoe County records. Introduced, read ~n fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of October, 1971. Published as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the of October, 1971. Mayor Attest: ex officio City C1erk -1- ______ .day • • T 32X I[ - ·-' • • • • I. Stephen A~ Lyon. do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true. accurate and co~p1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance. introduced. read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of October. 1971. ex officio City C1erk -2 - • • • '32x ( - • • • • INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING A UTILITY EASEMENT LYING AND BEING WITHIN THE SNOWBARGER SUBDIVISION • CITY OF ENGLEWOOD • COLORADO. WHEREAS, there present1y exists a Uti1ity Easement 1ying and being within the Snowbarger Subdivision of the City of Eng1e~ood, Co1orado; and WHEREAS, said Uti1ity Easement no 1onger serves any usefu1 purpose; and WHEREAS, the P1anning and Zoning Commission of the City of Eng1ewood has heretofore recomme~ded that said Uti1ity Easement be vacated. NOW • THEREFORE • BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLE WOOD. COLORADO. as fo11ows: 1 . That the fo11o~ing described Uti1ity Easement 1ocated within the City of Eng1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado be and the same is hereby vacated, to -wit: (a) Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 3, SNOWBARGER SUBDIVISION. 1yLng Ln the SE-1/4 SE-1/4 of Section 4, TSS, R68W; thence east a1ong the south ~Lne of said Lot 3. 8.0 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north and para11e1 to the west 1Lne of said Lot 3. 8.0 feet; thence east and para11e1 to the south 1ine of Lot 3. 182.0 feet; thence south and para1~e1 to the east 1ine of Lot 3. 8.0 feet to a point on the south 1ine of Lot 3; thence west a1ong the south 1ine of Lot 3. 182.0 feet to the true point of beginning. This vacation does not inc1ude the ~ater 1ine easement as recorded in Book 924. Pages 207 -209 & 211 of Arapahoe County r ecor ds. Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of October. 1971. Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the o£ October, 1971. ______ ,day Mayor Attest: ex officio City C1erk -1- • • • T 32X .......... • • I. Stephen A. Lyon. do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true. accurate and comp1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance. introduced. read in fu11 and passed on first readLng on the day of October. 1971. ex officio City C1erk -2- • • - - O FFICfAL C fT'V co··· • ,.-., 'U....,E NT C L E CITY OF L-~CLL .... OOD. Ca.t...l:l. INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING A UTILITY EASEMENT LYING AND BEING WITHIN THE SNOWBARGER SUBDIVISION. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. WHEREAS,. said Ut:i1it:y Easement no 1onger serves any usefu1 purpose. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCI L OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. as fo11ows: 1. That: the fo11o~ng described Ut:i1ity Easement: 1ocat:ed within the City of Eng1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado be and the same is hereby vacated, to-wit:: (a) Commencing at the southwest corner of Lot 3, SNOWBARGER SUBDIVISION. 1yLng Ln che SE-1/4 SE-1/4 of Section 4,. TSS, R68W; thence east: a1ong the south 1ine of said Lot: 3,. 8.0 feet to the true point of beginning; thence north and para11e1 to the west: 1ine of said Lot 3,. 8.0 feet; thence east and para11e1 to the south 1ine of Lot 3,. 182 .0 feet; thence south and para11e1 to the east 1ine of Lot: 3,. 8.0 feet to a poLnt: on the south 1ine of Lot 3; thence west a1ong the south 1Lne of Lot 3~ 182.0 feet to the true poLnt of begLnn1ng. This vacat~on does not Lnc1ude dhe water 1ine easement as recorded in Book 924~ Pages 207 -209 & 211 of Arapahoe County records. Introduced~ read in fu11 and passed on first the 20th day of Septe~ber. 1971. Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ord~nance on the day of 1971. Mayor Attest: ex officio C~ty C1erk -1- -- T 32X ( • O FF',-'AL CITY co· r--• ~EN T C~._.: ~ FILE CITY OF £...l'o.GLC\.VOOD. COLO. I , Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true , accurate and comp1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the 20th day of September, 1971. ex officio City C1erk -2 - - - CI'T"Y c9.. .F;', ':_ I . C I A L "='C UMENT .. ~y <-1- INTRODU C E D AS A BILL BY CO UNCIL1'1AN A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING A UTILITY EASEMENT LYING AND BEING WITHIN THE SNOI.TBARGE R SUBDIVISION, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. ~1EREAS, said Utility Easement no longer serves any useful purpose. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINE D BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEI.IOOD, COLORADO, as fo11o,,s: 1. That the fo11o~ng described Utility Easement located within the City of Engle,~ood. Arapahoe County, Colorado be and the same is _hereby vacated, t:o~wit:: (a) Commencing at: the sout:h~cst corner of Lot 3, SNOI.TBARGER SUBDIVISION, 1ying in the SE-1/4 SE-1/4 of Section 4, T5S,.. R68lY; thence ease along the south 1ine of said Lot 3, 8.0 feet: to the true point of beginning; thence north and parallel t:o the west line of said Lot 3, 8 .0 feet; thence ease and parallel t:o the south line of Lot: 3, 182.0 feet; thence south and parallel to the east line of Lot 3, 8.0 feet: to a point on the south line of Lot: 3; ~hence west a1ong ~he sou~h 1ine of Lo~ 3. 182.0 feet ~o ~he ~rue po~n~ of beginning . This vacation does not ~nc1ude the ~ater 1ine easement as recorded Ln Book 9 24 . Pages 207 -209 & 211 of Arapahoe C oun ~y rec ords. Introduced . reaC in fu11 and passed o n fi r st reading o n the 20th day of s ~ptember . 1971. Pu b1ished as a Bi11 for an O rdinance o n t he d ay o f 1.97 1. Mayor Attes t:: ~ ex offic~o City C1erk -1- . - II • - • C>FFJC:fAL crrv c r-. -. ~C UM ENT I I C O_ .. G FILE CITY O F LJ"...-CLEVVOOD. COLO. I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and £oregoing is a true. accurate and comp1ete copy of a Bi11 £or an Ordinance, ~ntroduced, read in fu11 and pass ed on first: reading on the 20t:h da.y of September . 1971 . ex officio C ity C1erk • • • • CITY C:~ F F I C f ~ du c CITy C... t:..h _._L ....... ao. ~~0. INTRODUCE D AS A BILL BY COU NCI~~ A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING A UTILITY EASEMENT LYING AND BEING WITHIN TilE SNO\VB ARGER SUBDIVISION. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. ~~EREAS , sa~d U~~1i~y Easement no 1onger serves any u sefu1 purpos e . NOW. THEREFORE • BE IT O RDAINED BY THE CITY COU,'CIL OF THE CITY O F ENGLEl,OOD. COLORADO. as fo1.1.ows: 1. That the fo11owing descr~bed Ut~1ity Easement 1oc ated within the City of Eng1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado be and the same is _h e reby v acated , to-wit: (a) Commencin g at the southwest corne r of Lot 3, SNOl,BARGER S UBDI VISION. l.y:Lng :Ln t:h e S E -1./4 S E -1/4 of S e ction 4, TSS, R68W; thence east a1ong the south 1ine ~f said Lot 3 , 8 .0 feet to the true point of b eg inning; thence north and para11e1 to the west 1ine of said Lot 3, 8.0 feet; thence east and para11e1 to th e sout:h 1ine of Lot: 3, 182 .0 feet; thence south and para11e1 to the east 1ine of Lot 3, 8.0 feet: to a point on the south 1ine of Lot 3; thence west a1ong the south 1ine of Lot 3, 182.0 fe e t: to t:h e true point of beginning . This vacation does not inc1ude t:he water 1ine easement as recorded in Book 9 24 , Pages 207 -209 & 211 of Arapahoe County r e c ords. Introduce d , read in fu11 and passed o n fi rs t reading o n the 20th day of September , 1971 . Pu b1ished as a Bi 11 for an O rdinance o n the d ay of 1.97 1.. Mayor Attest : ex o£ficio City C1erk -1- • • • '32x • • • • • -I 1 C OU"~'--L •· -r' G FIL.E C::rrv OF ENGLE V Ooo. C0LC1 I. Stephen A. Lyon~ do h ereby certify that the above and for egoing i s a tru e ~ accurate and complete copy of a Bi11 Lor an Ordinance , introduced , read in fu11 and pass e d on first read~n g on the 20th day o f Septembe r, 1971 . ex officio City Clerk -2 - • • • '32xl • • • • INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING THAT CERTAIN ALLEY LOCATED IN BLOCK 79, SHERIDAN HEIGHTS, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, COLORADO. WHEREAS, there present1y exists an a11ey 1 ocated Ln B1ock 79, SHERIDAN HEIGHTS, Eng1e~ood, Co1orado; and WHEREAS, the a11ey requested to be vac ated 1i.es enti.re1y ~ithin the City of Eng1ewood and has no common boundary with any other po1itica1 subdi~sion; and WHEREAS, i.f vacated, no 1and wou1d be 1eft without access to a dedicated pub1i.c way; and WHEREAS, no uti1ities are now 1ocated ~n said a11ey Which wou1d r e quire a right-o f -way; and WHEREAS, the P1anning and ZonLng Co~i.ssi.on of the City of Eng1ewood has heretofore recommended that the a11ey- wa.y be vacated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCI L OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO,. as fo11ows: Section 1. That the fo11ow~ng described a11ey, 1ocated with~n the City of Eng1ewood~ Arapahoe Coun~y~ Co1orado~ be and the same is hereby vaca~ed~ ~0-~~: The a11ey in B1ock 79~ SHERIDAN HEIGHTS~ Arapahoe Cou.n~y~ Co1orado~ between Sou~h R.a..ri~a.n and Sou~h Pecos S~reets~ bounded on the north by ~he Eng1ewood City Limi ts and on the south by West Ba1tic P1ace. Introduced~ read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of October~ 1971. of Pub1i.shed as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the 1971. Mayor Attest: ex offici o City C1erk ____ _:day I~ Stephen A. Lyon~ do hereby certify that: the above and foregoing is a true~ accurate and comp1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced~ read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of October~ 1971. ex off~c~o C~t y C1erk • • [ • • • • INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING THAT CERTAIN ALLEY LOCATED IN BLOCK 79. SHERIDAN HEIGHTS • ARAPAHOE COUNTY • COLORADO. WHEREAS, there present1y exists an a11ey 1ocated in B1ock 79, SHERIDAN HEIGHTS, Eng1ewood, Co1orado; and WHEREAS, the a11ey requested to be vacated 1ies entire1y ~ithin the City of Eng1e~ood and has no common boundary with any other po1itica1 subdivision; and WHEREAS, if ~acated, no 1and wou1d be 1eft without access to a dedicated pub1ic way; and WHEREAS, no uti1i...ties are now 1ocated in said a11ey which wou1d require a right-of-way; and WHEREAS, the P1an.n:Lng and Zoni...ng Comxn.i.ssi...on of the City of Eng1ewood has heretofore recommended that the a11ey- way be vacated. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLE'W'OOD. COLORADO. as fo11ows: Section 1. That t::he fo11owing described a11ey, 1ocat::ed within t::he City of Eng1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado, be and the same i...s hereby vacated, to-wit: The a11ey ~n B1ock 79, SHERIDAN HEIGHTS, Arapahoe County, Co1orado, beeween South Rar~tan and South Pecos Streets, bounded on the north by the Eng1e~ood City LLmits and on the south by West Ba1tic P1ace. Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on f~rst reading on the day of October, 1971. of Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the 1971. Mayor Attest:: ex officio City C1erk _____ .day I, Stephen A. Lyon, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and comp1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of O c tober, 1971. ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk • • 2X [ - - - - FOR PUBLICATION - • - 1971 LEAF PICKUP SCHEDULE FOR ENGLEwOOD RES I DENTS .. .::::a:r OFFICIAL CO'F:~!:: '.;?OCU MEN'T The £o11ow~ng schedu1e wi11 b e ~o11owed as near as possib1e~ weather and other conditions p er m~tting, 1or the p~ckup o~ 1eaves by the Street D e partment . R esidents are requested to put th e ir 1 ca ves into p1astic bags and p1ace them near the curb on days indicated. AREA SCHEDULED DAYS From Evans and Ya1 c Avenue south to F1oyd Avenu e From F1oyd Avenue south to Mans£ie1d Avenue From Mans:Lie1d Avenue south to S tan1:ord Avenue From Stan£ord Avenue south to Be11eview Avenue and C ity 1 imi..ts south. -/[ ~:..---.... /c (' -·· (" ~ ~ . -y ·) - KELLS WAGGONER DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WO RKS KW:pd Nov. s. 24. Nov. 11. 2 9. Nov. 16. D ec. 1, Nov. 1 9. D ec. 3. 9. 10 & 26 12. 15 & 30 17. 18 & 2 2 2. 2 3 & 6 -- T 32X ( 'Jo v. / /_, .I 2., / .s-~ 2.9_,_3-o Nov . • • "'b v. /9, 22, 2..3 Dec. . ..3, G • • 0 - • • • - • • • • 0 .. - OF FICIAL cn::r: CO ~~~~~-~UMENT COU C:IL r ... ...;.._-, -G FILE ~OF ENGLENOOD. COLO. LEAF PrCKUP 1971 Th~s y e ar the C~ty o~ En g 1 ewood w~11 try a n ew method o~ 1ea1 p~ckup bop~ng Lo m~n~m ~z e th e cosL o1 co11ect~on and to d ecrease th e inconv enience o1 b1owi n g l.eav es~ pl.u gged catch basins. pi1es o1 1 eavcs in th e gutter. etc. Th e City wi11 make avai1ab1c ~or each r es id en ce 1ive (5) p1astic b ags, 55 ga 11on capacity _. in which 1 eaves are t.o be p1aced .J:or pickup by City crews. Th e pl.a.sti"c ba gs wi.11 b e avai.l.abl.e 1"rom O c tober 1 -_. 1971 , to Nov e mb e r 15. 1971 , at th e 1ol.l.owing l.oca tioos during th e hour s indicat.ed: 8:00AM to 6:00 PM -7 days p e r week Fire Station No. 1 Fire Station No. 2 - Fire Stat.ion No. 3 - Fir e St atio n No. 4 - Pol.ic e S ta tion -195 A11eo Fi1t er P1ant - 175 W. Girard Avenu e 590 E. Quincy Av e nu e 595 W. Be11evi ew Av en ue 2890 S. Zuni Street W. Girard Av enue 1500 W. Layton Avenue 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM -Monday thru Friday En g1ewood City Ha11 -3400 S. E1ati Street 7:30 AM to 4:00 PM -Monday thru Friday Eng1ewood Servicenter -2800 S. P1atte River Drive Reside nts arc r e qu es t,~c. to tie the p1astic bags and p1ace them n ear th e curb on the days indicated in the attached schedu1e ~or pick up by Lh e City crc~s - Fu11 coope ration ~ro m a11 parties invo1ved is needed in order to rea1ize the comp1 e te ben e ~it o~ this program. /,/ /- /-cc'C . <<---~ ~--- K e 11s Wa ggon e r Dir ec t.or o:£ Pub1ic Works KlV: pd 9 /2 1 /71 • . ' II • • I' 32X I[ - T O : FROM : SUBJECT : • • • 0 - I NTER-OFFICE l\.1ErAO RANDUM Stan1ey II. Dial., City Manager D ATE': Workab1c Program Citizens' Committee Budget Requests fo r 1972 'l' G Fl'--E. r:u~ -~...._G\.....~ ·oOD ~ c:.o'-0 c;..-r< oF September 2 7, 1971 Thank you for permitting the Committee to submi t its comments re 1a tive to the 1972 Budget a s it re1ates to programs in which we are interested . The fo11owing comments re1ate to programs which w1.1 1 be an intcgra1 part o f the propose d Workab1e Pro- gram for t.he City of Eng1ewood. The p.l.-oposed Worka.b1e Program is nearing ~~mpl.e t io n and wi 11 be submi tted to the Ci ty Council. in the near future for consideration. O RGANIZATIONA L APPROACH The C ommittee agrees with , and supports . the creation of a Department of Com.muni.t y Deve1oprnen t as a 1ogica.1 means of coordinating the functions of Construction Codes. Environ- menta1 Codes . J-lou sing aod Rcdeve1opment and Pl.anniog . This approach wi 11 be particu1ar1y he1pfu1 in s ol.ving the probl.ems identified by the Committee in the \Vorkabl.e Pro gram . The groupiBg of ~hese £unctions wi11 al.so be he1pfu1 in assiSti ng two additional. a ge ncies :it is anticipated wi11 be f ormed. a Housing Authority and an Urban R e n ewa l. Authority . STAFFING We are p1eased w~t h t h e ~n c1us~on o f a n ew pos~t~on of Hous~ng Coord~nat or ~n the budget . We understand that th~s perso n w111 be a n Assistant Direc tor of the department. and wi11 be i n charge o.f the Workabl.c Program . Redove1opment. Housin g Pro- g ram and Rcl.ocation . It is recog ni zed that as programs are devc1opcd addi.tional. staffing wi 11 be necessary. but in the mea ntime a .Cu 11-time staff member w.i11 be avai1ab1e to f o rm u1ate programs in these critical. areas • Xn the area o:f Environmental. Code Enforcement . it is s u ggested that an addi tiona1 inspec tor wi11 be required to adequate1y hand1e the work 1oad proposed by prog rams of the Com.mittee . It is proposed in the Workab1 e Program that a systematic . are a-by-area inspection program be initiated to enforce Environment al. Codes . As you know. one man can not adequate 1y ha.ndl.e the c urrent 1oad on a comp1a.in t b asis; corrsequent1y • add~t~ona 1 sta £f wou1d be requ~red f or a m ore ~ntcns~ve pro gram . • • I' 32 X ( - • • • - BUDGETED JUIO UNTS The Committee has received a r e port re1..ati v e to operati.ona1 expenditures r equired for its s upport and has fo und that ove r $700 has been expe nd e d since its creation in March. It is suggested that the amount of $4,000 be added to the budget o~ th e Community D e v e 1opment D e partment to provide for opcrationa1 sup port inc1udi.ng secretaria1 h e 1p~ dup1i.c ating. etc . A g ain. the Committee appreci ates this opportunity to make suggestions re1ative to the 1972 Budget and respect-r.u11y requests your, and the City CounciJ..•s consideration. J. LOUIS PARKINSON, Chairman W'o r kab1e Program Citizens• Committee g w • • • r 32xiC • • • • 0 - TO: Honorab1e Mayor and City Counci1 via Stan1ey H. Dia1, City Manager FROM : Workab1e Program Citizens• O FFICI A C::OU r• r- ' <' ' LE --------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~~~~~~~~O~CL SUBJECT : Recommendation o f Proposed Workab1e Program The Workab1e Program Citizens• Committee. at its meeting September 23, 1971. approved the dra ft of the Workab1e Pro- gram App1ication dated September 23. 1971. referred the app1ication to City Counci1 for review and approva1 prior to the submission to the Department of Housing and Urban Deve1opment for certification. The Committee anticipates that the City Counci1 ~ay wish~ have a study meeting to consider tbe app1ication prior to approva1 and wi11 be happy to meet with the Counci1 at its convenience. The agenda for the next Committee meeting on October 7th. (Thursday). bas been he1d open to meet with tbe Counci1 if this date is convenient. Director of P1anning on beha1f or Workab1e Program Citizens• Committee gw encl.osure: Draft of Proposed Workab1e Program App1ication (Attachments are not incl.uded because al.1 aPe not yet comp1eted) • September 30, 1971 • • • T 32X ( - • • ( - • - ........... .. ltUD-10311 ~ (11 -.t.8) September 23, 1971 En g 1ewood~ Co1orado ------(c;.;-.; ... ~.-;)------- ----,;;;sc:-, •. .,.., .. , ... w.,. of Ch ... ,-e:-;;:;~--- _ _§__1:_~U~:L _!!_ .. .R_ia1 •-!==i ty _M~nager _ (No...,• end T ott.,) U .S . OEPARP.•ENT OF HOUSIN G Af'lO UR9-AS OEVELC ?V.ENT • • [ - - ( I I_ ( ( --- GEZ'\EI!AL HUO-IOSt (11-68) REQU lltE:\lEXTS. (1) Establish administrath;e mechanism r espon sible to the chief executive f or the purpose of providing l eaders hip, supervision , and coordination of \\or'l .. ablc Program activiti es. (2 ) Pro\.·idc cxpl ann.tion for any obj ectives set during l ast period "hie!' were not achieved_ J-Id entify the person :::ud office or agency designated to supervise and coordinate Workab l e Program act h~itic.s . and d escribe the rel at ions hip of s uch pcrson and o ffi ce or agency to the chief cxccutiv~ (S ee Att achment 1) 2 . For any target. action . or t.i mctablc proposed by the community and appro,·cd by the D c p3rtmen t at Ulc tilnc o f the l ast certification""' hich h as not b een met_ or c.arricd out, provide a detailed expl anation of the reasons. Not a.pp1i.cab1e .. -1 - -- r 32xl ( --- HU0-1081 (11-68) REQUlllE~lENTS. (1) E .staLii s h admini s tr-ali\C mechani s m res pons ible to the chief executive for the purpos-e of providing lea.der:::.hip. supervi s ion. and coordination of Worl~a blc Program activities. (2) Provide explanation for any objccth·cs set during last period '"hicl;\ ,vcrc not achieved . 1. Identify the person n .. d officc or agency dc.signatcd to supen•is-c and coordinate Workable Program :..ctivities .• and describe the relations hip of such person and office or agency to the chief executive. (See Attachment 1) 2. For any t ar-gc_·t. action. or ti metab le propos-ed by the community nnd apJ:lro,·cd by the Ocp!lrtmcnt at Uu;~ tiine of t.hc l ast c crtincation '' hich h ::LS not bee-n mct_or carried out. provide a detailed cxpl::1.nation of tho r-easons .. Not n.pp1icab1c. --~----~~----~--------------~----------~-1- - - r 32x - - ( • • • • - ATTACHJ,lENT 1 Supervision and coordination of the \'i'orkabl.c P :rogram wi.11 be the primary rcsponsi.bil.i.ty of t..he P1an.n.i.ng Department under the City l\tan:1.{;Cr ~ The City o:f Eng1cwood Home Rule Charter, adopted in 1958. estab1ished a Counci.1-Manager form of govcrllincnt under which the el.ectcd City Council. appoints a City )la1 ~a ger who is the chief executive officer and heads the aclmi.ni.st..rati.ve branch of the City Government . Among t..ho powers and duties of the City Manager arc the appointment.. ::-nd removal. of "'City emp1oyces , and t:i'le super- vision and central. over a11 executive and ad.mi.ni.stra.ti.ve departments . The program, then, wi.11 be operated by the Pl.anni.ng Director under the d~recti.on of the C~ty Manager w~th~u the po1~c~es estab1~shed by tl1e C~ty Counc~1, wh~ch ~s compr~sed of seven members: El...nter E. Sch""•ab John J. Lay Oa11as J. Dhor~ty Jlownrd R. Brown Ati.1t..on Senti John C. Krei.1.ing Leo Lentsch Alayor Alayor Pro Tem Counci1nlan Counci.l..nlan Counc~1man Counc~l...Jna.n Counc.i1man • • r 32xiC \ ! =r - ( ( • • ( • -•\.10 ·1!'8 1 1 1 -4E} • 0 - llu:• :tdopti o n of l h~· l a r-·-1 p u hli !>ho.·t l t ·d it i o n of u no o f lh<· n a ri o n a ll)> n .. •coc;ni "'-··--' m o d e l hou:;-int;• • building. plurnbin~-;, Ph.·ctri <"":tl, flp · pn .. ''-<'n t i .. n :t nd rcktlc.•d c o tlcs and o rdin a nc e ~. u,... a m ..... ndcrl , or .:5 Lalc o r loc-a l co u dc:-.,; ,.., iLh com p ::u -a LI"' :--fancfant s. b. "l "hc C'.::'l ..l bli .,..h nl c nl of _,,.. (•(f•·•·-"'l"c c:odll" t ·nforc::cm4..-.nl program. J. Corn p :o.-tc the follon ing ,....._·1·<.-c..ltdc fo~ c oclcs adopted by I he c-ommunity . ll ou s i n g ..... X Ouilding ...... y Pl umbing ---• ~ --- L -- I nter-County Rcgi.ooa1 P1annirag J11Jil__i...ss_:i_on__{DRCOG.)~ll.ousing COdfL---'-"' Denver Bu~1ding Cod e (Utti fox:m.._BuiLding_Code.).__ __ ---1----L X I r ---~~---~7 F:tccLric::t1 . • •• "" X J Fire Pre" cntion 7 0 2. O cs c"';.!?,~~>ifrr .. -,\1-f}frfi:?.}Jf:-..-!-.,.c;.~MP~~J-d1 r oP/<"n<i:~¥9c:1;H:'U';!? .. ."S.iluation and upc:bting o f the ~Jopt c-d codes a n d ordin:tnC"c-s: The Housi.ng . Bui1d.i.ng . Heating :and Plumbing Code ch:.tng es arc s u g - g ested by the Chic£ Bui1ding Inspector , reviewed and :.tdopted b y the City Council.. This is done :.ts deemed nece s sary by the Chief Buil.ding In s p e ctor . The E l ec tric Code is updated with modi£.i.cation.s by the :r.fat.i.on.a 1 E1 cc tric C od e as w ritte n. by the National FiL-e Protection A sso c in.tion . Tl1e da tcs o.f the last rcvisiorls o.f the various codes :arc : Housing...... .. ..... 1971) Bui1ding .·-·····-····-1 9 69 ) See nttnchcd adopting P1l.nn b.ing ......... • ••• 1970 ) Ordinances . E1cc tr.i.ca1 ...... . .... 19GS ) 1-'"".i.rc Prevention... . ... 1971) Continued Pa g e 2 -A • - 2 - • • • T -..2X - - ( • • • .. - PAGE 2-A 2 . (Ca·u t.i.nuCd ) The fo1l.o w ing ••n.at.i.ona1u codes arc in the adoption process and arc C-Xpc c ted to be in c.ffcct: i.n November, 1971: 1970 1970 1970 1970 19GB Vo1u.m.e Vo1u.rne Vo11..une Un.i.fo~-m Bu.i.1diug-Code , Un.i.Iorm Oui1ding Code, Uniform Bui1ding Code , Un.i..form P1urnbing Code Natioua1 E1ectrica 1 Code . I I I IV Bui1ding Mechani.ca 1 Dangerous Bui1d.i.n gs • • r 32 x [ - -..· ( • • • • - HUD-1G3J (t 1-63) 3 . ft.•, .... n tif) at~ .. J ju ~ti ry :::n y m~j .>r d ... , l:t.ti on-in th(! corles :tt.!'->pt hy the co,nmunify rr~m the ~f:u:d :u·ds sC:t. f o.-t.h in t :u! nationally r-cco:. liz...:d coUcs .as ::Jme>:u!.·d . c· .. ctudi;,g lnin')r a.J ,nin i -tra t.i .. c ch::tn::.c~ ::!nd revisions._ ... ,Lr:... ~h ee l ~ i r n~C'("~.Sa ry. "l,'lC Intcr-Cou n.t.y Rc~i.ona1 Planning Commission {predecesso r to Denver R cc;.i.on.::t1 Council. of Govct·nncnts ) Housing Code was t.hc ~1ode 1 Code adopt..c d by Ene-l.c wood i n 1966 . A recen t amendmen t (sec Attac hment ) prohibits the usc of bath room :.Cacil..i.t.i.cs by more than on e dwc l.l..i.ng unit . It .is .£c1t that this Housi n g Code i s more c..ffccti vc than Vol.UJne J:I:Z o£ the Uni form Bu.i.l.d.i.nt;: Code .· 4. D escribe in g c n:;.-:r=~l. end to t-l :c exte nt poss ible qu.:!ntinabtc. t enn.s the Jungcr-rangc plans ~nd obje ctives f o r u s ing hous ing. bailding and rcla.Lcd code cn f o cc.crncnt to h e lp c li rn in.:J.te and pn!vent lha f cr:natio01 and spread or s lums and bli:;hc.. 5. Dce cribc t he comc:::.~ity•s plan of ::.!.clion during the next pe-riod f o r cffci:th·cty d...,a ling ''ith a.rca..s and/~r types of uni t;J h:..ving hi{;~ r ri ority need f o r code cnforc.cwcnt. incl u din.::; bot-h pro~m.s to s t o ;::t bll:;ht in s ound bUt dctcrior:.tting :t rC:t::t :-ad prog r:.u .. .s to d ea l nith serious chrcat..s to h c:1 lth a nd .s:t f cty in s lum areas. (n.) E"<pl a in t-he b .::..s i s for t!.c .are:.'ls :!.nd procrarn s}:r::lt cgics scl cctccf. (.Attach maps . charts o r other infonna.-· l ion :1.s may b.~ nc-ccss:lry to explain tho:! contc:!'"<l for the plan of ac tion .) -3- • • .. '32x [ - - ( • • • - PAGl-; 3-A -'1. The .. A:rc:l.s of' Concern .. l ap (J\.tt achrn.e nt ) indi.cat.cs .:Ci.vc aren.s in whi..ch substandard dwcl..l...i.n.g units ::t'l~c mos t prevalent . rang~ng Erom 10% to 35% or the tota1 ~we11~ng un~ts ~n Lhe arcns. The 422 substandard dwc1 1..ing unit s in the five .. Ar eas o.C Concern.•• r eprese nt <1.3'% o.f the 875 substand ard dwc11in.g units idct~tificd in the City by the 1969 Land Usc Stu~y n•~d tJtc 1970 Hou s ing Stud y. Because most of the dcvel..op:mcnt in Eng1cwood occurred some yca.1.·s a g o , t.he rema i nder of the substandard dwel..l..ing units arc seat tcrcd througltou t the city . Trca trocu. t o.f t::h.c areas outside of the A .rcas of Concern w.i.l..l.. best be handl..ed th .1:ough a systematic program of area by area inspection and en- forcemen t. It is int~~ded tltat i..n the 1972 Budget (concurrent w~th Ca1cn.dar 1..::;72) a Department oL Community Dcve1 opcent w.i.11 be csta01ished, w hich wi11 incl.ude the Construction Codes. En.viron.mcn.ta.1 Codes, Housing ~nd Redcve1opmen.t ::tnd P1a.nning functions . TI'le a..rea by area. code enforcemen t pro gr:-un. out- side o£ the Arca.s of Concern coul.d best be hand1cd uuder--~En.viron.n tcnta.1 Codes :Cuuc tion '\Vhich. wi 11 incl.udc en- forcement of Housing, Zoui.ng , Litter, i'o"eeds and Junk. Auto Codes. It is anticipated that a.n. additiona1 inspector w.i.1 1 be added ~o tl~e staf£ to assist tile sing 1c man , currcnt1 y llat~d1ing tl1is function on ~ coup1ait~t ba.sis , to pe~ni~ the more syst.cm::ttic approach . Construction Codes inspectors (3) '\\fi.11 be :tva.i1ab1e to a ssi st the Environme ntal. CodeS itlspectors itl 1:11e various tcchtlica1 code areas . We nnticipntc tl1at: approxiJn ntc1y one-11a1f of the s ubs tandard s tructures outside of t:J1e Areas o£ Concern (225) wi 11 be b~o ug ltt i11to comp1iance during the iuit~a 1 ccrt~f~cat~on pcr~o d. The Ass~stant Di r ec tor o.f Conunu nity Deve1opmen t - H ousi n g and Redcve1opmc nt: wi11 be rcspons~b1e for coordinating the rc1ocntion program which '\Vi 11 be necess::try as a r esul.t of the enforceme nt program . • • T 32XI - ( • • • • • - PAGE 3-13 5. 'l'hc .J:tajo....-thrus t of Lhi_s \',"o~·l<:::lblc Pl:Ogl.·:un i s Lo t.rcaL Area oC C<?nccrn. ''A'' ( tort.h•.•.·cs t En :-l.cwood ) t..hl..·ou:.;-h U1.·b~n. R cncw a.1,. prc C cL·nh l.y und c 1.· a Z:c..ir;h borhoocl ecvc 1opmc n.t Prot:l.·::u!l , but not t.·ul..i.ng ou t ''Convcnt.ion::t 1 .. U..&.·~an rtc n cvJ al... A s t.hc p.L·o.,ject in · Are a "A'' i.s comp leted, we HOu1d hope t.o continue Lhc NDP pro - gr::tm in. t.h.c ot..h.cr Areas o.f Concer n in. Lhe :Col.l.ow i.n g priority : ''C'',. ''E'', ·· 13'', a 11d ••o••. TJ1 c code ct~for ccme nt pl.·ogrnJn in areas outside o~ the Areas of Concern w.i.11 be conducted as a part o.f the Env:ironJncnta 1 Codes :Cunction o.£ the Department of Comm unity Dcvc1opmcnt . Existing st:a.f ·fing of one man permits action on.1.y on a ''compl..o..i.nt basis". I t is an·t:i..ci..patcd that an additiona 1 man wi11 be added during 1972 which w.i.11 pcrm.i.t a s y s tematic . area by area. approach to code enforcemen t. ~ ... ~a oth c.1. :-... oss.i.bil.it:i.es are be:i.ng i..tl.vestigated rcl.ativc t o code cnfo--c~rncnt. One is the HUD Concentrated Code Enforce - ment progr3m . Another ~s that w h~ch we w~11 c311 Area Dc - vcl.opJTtc nt. Wit.h this npproach., a designated area ·woul.d be chosen and studied by the C i ty sta ff to dctcrm:i.nc needed pub1~c nnd s e1£-hc~p ~mprovc mc nt projects w h~ch cou 1d 3pp1y. In ~d~ition to cornp rcll ensi vc code Ctl.forccment. ~ll.is coul.d incl.udc s t.rcct . s.i.dcw al.k . s c~cr. ~atc r . und ergroun d ut i lities . min.i.-parl<s. draina ge , st r eet . tree and conu.nunity center needs Otl. tll.c publ..i.c sid e , a1l.d paint-up. cl.ean.-up a nd Lix-up on the private (sc l.f-h c l.p) side . The City mi:;:-ht pur c ha se pain t a t bu1k rates to s cl.l. to property O Wil.Crs at cost as an incenti v e to pnint their residences . '"nlis tyr.c-of COJ prc hcn s .i.vc ap-pro~~ll ap pears to ll.ave a ~rca t deal. o£ meri t. · In addition to tile prog rnms mcnt~oncd above. otllcr nppl.~cab l.e C~ty pl·og l.·ams ~tlcl.ude: a . Ocvc1opmcn.t of a. Grccnbcl.t .i.n the Northwest E n g 1cwood ... \rca (Arc::. .,A,.) ""'h~ch, i.n con,junct~on. w_i t:h. s tornt dl.-nin::tge ittpt.·ovcmcn.ts. w i11 bcauti.Cy a n unsi g ht1y and dangerous g~I~C il., prov.i.dc .opcn space ::ltl.d recreation area atl.d se parate r s iden tial. and industria l. u se s . b. D cvc l.o pme nt of a $6 mi 11ion. s torm drainage system over a si x to seven year period . Stora ge basins wi 11 be crcntcd in. s cvera1 areas to s 1ow runo fr . w lt.ich ca.n. be . uLi.l.i.zcd as open s pace a nd .l."Ccrcat.i.on.a1 arca.s w hen no t u sed Eor storm drn~nn gc purposes . c . A cot,tillLting park dcvc1opmctl.t program (sec Capita 1 I mprov ements Progr3m ) . d . R cp1accmctl.t nll.d/or Cll1nrgctdc nt o£ wa ter atl.d sewe r 1.incs and trcatJ"•tcnt f':tci~itics . Water l.:incs nrc being upg raded in o1dc l.· areas to c ~l min.::t tc su b s tanda.1.·d 11n.cs and to p rovide fo r 1an.d usc C llang cs . • • '. ~ - - • • ·i i I I I. c L i i • • 0 - P/\GE 3-C 5 . (coi"lti.nucd } Sa .. e. i\ cont.inuin~ Pnving and S.idc wa l.k District progrnm to .ins ut.·o that: these improvcrncnt:s :"l.rc av;.-.i.Jab~c throughou t t..h.c City . f. E1,virotlmenta1 code enforceme nt, cspcc~a11y relative to - vJecds, 1i Ltcr and .,junk au tomobi 1 es .. Areas of Concern were designated based upon study and analysis rcsu1tin.g .L.rom the Land Usc Study, CoJ:l pl."chcnsi.ve P1an. and the Housing Study . Consu1tation. with HUD personnel has hc1ped us to determine that the best approach to s olving man y of the problems in Area ""A" is Urban. Rencwa1 .., prc.:Cerab1y as an. DP pro,jcct .. ..·'l"l.i.S program provides the ma.x.i...mu.m. ut.i.1.i.z.ati.on of pub1ic an~ private €uuds, offers tl~e fastest aetl1od of getting to work in the area, and wi11 a11ow citizen interes t in the area to be maximized • . 4'\rea .. A,. (Northwest F:n.g1cwood) has been chosen for the ini tia1 project o.f the Wo.rkabl.c Program for t.hc .fo11owi n.g rcaso11s: - 1... Citizen groups in the area have formed an improvemen t association to help themse lves and have expressed in- terest it\ participating in a pro gr~m ror improvin.~ tlle a~~ca . 2 ... This area has the h:igilcst concentration of substandard dwc11~ng un~ts (37$ of tota1 ~n nrca ) of nn y of the ..... '\rcas of Con.cer11.. •• 3. The prox~m~ty to Dcnver"s Co11cge V~cw NDP which is ad..:jaccnt to the ""·es t of Area ''A'" ... of the cnt~re rcs~dcnt~a1 area w~11 rcsu1t cllat~cc o£ recurring b1ight ... project Treatment: in 1css ~-Non-cash crcd~ts ava~1ab1e ~n the area. a new c1crncntary schoo 1 ($370.000) and a proposed new f~re subs tat~on ($100,000) wi11 provide :Cor max-imizi ng pub1ic expend-itures ·in. the n1.·ea ... • • • r 32x [ - ( IIU 0 ·1 C ll (1\-!.S.) - 0 -.. G. CoPpari! t ~1 c-sco;~~ o f t he 1 ~;-v j O!'c·d p !~" o f :::.ctio:-. wit!l th ~ p1 :!-n S f o r~·~ p rc"ious p coiod in such e 1~1 :ln n c r n ~ t o .::,loO"· \". h ;•t c!c-~rcc of r r._.i\::'i'S I s b ..._•ir:.; 1.1::..Uc t ov . .::.rd OIC :Ii C '~>i ng t he C om:nuni ty•~ l t.•n :;cr-r:-n.:;o obj c::tivcs o f c oo .H.t~nil ) .,. iclc c.:n:t?l i :-nee.. Not nppl..i ca bl..e. 7. Des cribe ar:d s t;;--r o rl t::o b:..sd:;.ct. end s t ::t ff r cso u rccs to b e =:.I loca t e d in the nc,._t p e ri o d to c :!..rry o u t the. ~n f orccrnc-nt p ro~...;.;.~ !!::scrib::d in -1 a o ve . inclc d in:; info n .1~tion v. ilh rc ~pcct to the cn!c :--c.c-r.lcnt of buildtng nnd rch~.l.-:!d. c o des. :...s .. -.·e ll as to h o u s ing cc:ic.s.· Attnchcd bud g et figures ::Cor t.hc D e partn cnt of Conl'l.Unity Dcvc1'op~n cnt indi.ca"Lc ant.i.cip:ttcd expenditures :for Code En- :1:"orccmen.t in. 1972 . A Concentrated Code En:Corcement Program , ~£ chos en , wou1d rcqu~re a separa~e app1~caL~on at wh~cb Lime dc~a~1ed addit~ona 1 requ~red cxpcnd~Lures wi 11 be ~nd~catcd. 8. J:nfo:'CC&l;;:o nl da13. Thi s Hcvo rt Cove r s th e f"e ;-i o :J From Ju1y 1 INSPCC- TIO NS • TOTAl... tNSPEC.TEO June 30 FOUNOIN VIOl-ATIO N "'"' 1971 VIOl....-..TIONS .-..o.-..TEO Jt o u s inti. xxxx 684 122 170 --~------l-------~-~~~--~~~-=~~-r~1~2~2~r-~1~7~0~--3 ~9~+--~7·.s~-r-7L'~S-~ __ ,Ldglj_>_ Build i n ,::. 773 2507 773 663 233 233 22 Pl u r.1 bing . 329 1487 32!> 700 18 18 --·- El ccfrica l. 6"13 1686 643 765 101 Fir.;! P rc;.·~n ~lon • 14.-:15 900 53 52 **2n!'!:"r. . -"130 1626 LEGE r:O. s S t6uC:t u r .. 0 Dw.,tling Unirs. • C oun t L"'~;;•:_.c tl o ns on the F o !h>'l-v ln; O r.:l-l~<: -One tn ~;:.c:c:l-ion 1:. one .. -i .-i t by o ne ln r :lec t o r 0 t o o~e build!_n:: or st""'c ture. • •• l'"or h :>u ~l<•t: c o c!-n . ~d.! r n y n :::>n,..-eom;-tl enc:e c:•r'T)Oo ,·c r f rom pdor ln £;Jcc:tions. ,._.,._* Jl c nt.ing & A/C 3"12 1571 327 1022 -4· - 25 -- .• '32 ( • • • • 0 - UUD·lOat (11 ·5£> f:I~(!UII:E.\IE:"T. The d :!vclopm<"nt. of an cffcc t.ivc , ("O:-lti nui ng pl a nninc;, and progr.:1 m1uin:; process ''hich cng:t.~cs in the d cvc J o p ra~·nt of coi.tJ"rch c n s i\c pl :tns and t rans l :1tc:S ::.•:o..·h p!:.!~s i n to ac tion p r ogr.11"a-"i to h e l p ovc.rcomc the maj ur ph):::.iC:!.I , ~oci:•l, racial and cconOJol iC p rol.lcms: of Lhc s l um :nod·blight-- cd a.-cas "' i thin the community. D esc ribe the s t,.3tu.s of t he co aunun iiy"s gCIH!r.l l pl an ""· irh re.:::-pcct to it s com pletion and adoption . and indi- cate the u :l tu n:~~ and :::-t·.tu.s of c~1C'h of the fu nct iona l plan s or c omvonc;.t s th:l t con.:=-i.itute 1hc g(.·ncr2-l pl a n (e .g . l and u sc, u -:t n-,,..,_tation , h o -a s ing. co mmun ity Lle ilitics , p ub lic i m p :-o,cntcn t p:-osr an•s . etc.) The Co m pl.~ch c n s ivc P1:tn :Cor t.hc City of En g l.ewood "vas prepared by J>]_ann.i.n g D c p:-trtmcnt sta.C£ dur"ing the years 1.9 5 8 n.n.d 1.96 9_ The Pl.an w:-ts ndoptcd by the City Pl.ann.ing n.nd Zoning Com_m i ss ion Jul.y 17, 1 9C9 , nnd by t:hc Cit.y Council.. Au gus t l.S, J9G9 . Segme nts o~ ~he P13n i1~cl.udc : tl~s~o.ry and Chnract.er , Drnit~agc Pl.nn , hlaster St.rect Pl.at~, Recreation Pl.an, Popul.ntion and Lnn.d Use , Ccn~ra1 Cusi u es s District , Publ.ic Facil.itics a1~d A Pl.nce t.o Live . I mp1cment:-tti.on o::C the Pl.nn i.s prj m nril..y carried out t...hrough the Co m prchcn s ~vc Zon~n g O rd~nnncc, Subd~v~s~on Rc a ulnt~ons _and t h e C:::lpi.t a l. It.tprovcucn.ts P.ro!;"ram.. A major suppl.cment;:Jry study rc l.ati.v e to Tr:l.n spo.r tatjon h::~s be e n con:pl.c tcd and is at1..~chcd hereto . The City pnrt i.ci.pat. s i.1~ t.l1c K nti.ona l. Fl.ood It1 s urance Pro g r3m and F1ood Pl.n.i n nc-gul.ations nrc b ei n g-drn.:Ct.ed prior t..o the end o£ 1 9 71. Revie ·w o:C the Copita.l. I t :-:!proveme nts Program :Cor 1972-197G by Cit y Council, Do:1.rds :and Cou..!il.issi.ons , \i"o r 1:.:n.bl..c Prog ran t Citizens • Com- mittee and adm ini.s 1..rn1...ive s t:n.::Cf has been co:;n pl..ctcd nnd 1.he scbedul.e of i mp rover.tcn ts i s att ached .. f\.lnjor i m provCl!lC nt.s p.J..~oposcd i.n the Storm Dr::ti.na gc S1..udy, January 1971, ore propOse d in 1.h.e Nort..hv:cst En g l.e'\·.'oo d (Are a "A"•) ~n.d North- ca st En ~1cv:ood B~sjns nrc bein g planne d nnd a joint a ppl.i.ca1.i.on b y J-::n ~lcv:cod and D o nvcr h as b ee n submi.t..tcd throug h the U rb::::..n Dr~i.nage and J:.~l.ood Con1.ro1. District .Cor Fcdern1 parti.cipaL:i.on i .n the cost o£ t J,cse i rnpr ovc ~c nts . (Cot1~i1~ued on Paee SA ) a. l ndicn.tc th~ !:l.· 1:.5 or the cohlr>ounil.) ·~ z.on i nz o:-rlin:ln.rc . :1 nd any p l a n s r oo fu:u!"C r c " i c ,.,,._ The Colo prchensi ve Zoning Ordi.nnncc was ;adopted S e ptem b e r 1G , ].963 .. A C ~d }>Jct..e revjcw o£ t..l1c ordit~n11Ce i.s c~t r ~c nt1y underwa y with a ci.t..i ~c n.s cor.u"ii.1...1.cc ·wol..·1-;.i.n.~ wi.t lt t.h e P1an.n i.ng D c-partncnt. TI1c ~-c v i.scd O r d illnl~cc ~s prOJOSc d ~o be nctoptcd by tl~c e11d o£ 1971 . Revi e w :i.s utj.Ji.z."in!:!" Co:l"!._::.rehcnsi..vc PJ.an., L'lnd U sc Study n.n.d J lou sj n g s ·Lucty wi ·Lh t.h c i.nt.cn t.Jon oi sa~i.:o=:;.Cyi.n~ t..h.e go::t l .s est..:l.b1is h- c d by the Com prcJlC 11 S i.vc P1nt1 , cspacla11y i.11 rc ~n rd t.o rcsi.d c nt.~~l u ses . -5 - • • T 32X - - ( • • • • • t• - t>J\GE 5 .1\ 1 . (Cont.inucd) P.robnb1y t.hc mo s t signi.Cicant. part o:C t.hc Comprehensive P1an in. .rclrtt..ion 1..o t.hc Worknb1c Program is .. A P1acc to Live•• in ·which are discussed the Areas oi Concc~-n nnd methods o~ encouraging rcdcvc1opme nt <~..nd the .resu1ti.ng pl..·ob1cms or possi.bi1it:i..cs because or changing 1and use re1at.i.ons hips and the need :ror a coordinated rcl..oCati.on. prograJo 1"or persons disp1accd by redcve1opment . • • T 32 X ( • • ftU0-1091 (11-ot:.e) • 0 - 2. l .. i--t the !-'hntic::·::. th ~t h:-t.Yc l .. ""c-n or ure l.u:•in:.! r.1:tdc of the l.1 ~jor pJiy, ical, :-oci:!l, r-aci:-1. :.Hal c-c:·o.aomic prob- l cr.t of fhc bo htiO\ ,nrt bli.:;ht ... d :--n:•;-s (<"·~-r<."nc::·u-~1, c:-c.!uc.•tion, C'1-tplO)JUC.·;11 , •<>c:·rcati on nccd o::;. etc.), :.1nU inc.Hca tc t he c:;tir.t.•lPd cos;,pl c tinn Ool lC "< f or lho -c:-undcn,ny . 1 . lon1.at;c -1 962 (An n l.ysi.s o£ 19GO Census ) 2 . Parkin g lonograph -19G4 3 . Lnnd Use SLudy -1969 4 . Co mprc hcn s~vc P1an -1969 5 . Housing St..udy -1.970 (Un.pub1i.shed ) 6. Recrcat..ion -D e Jtvcr Univcrsi 1.y , Bureau o£ Educationa l. Research -1959 7. Tra~ric Study -1971 B. Pnrk Rep1ncc1ncnt P1an -1964 9 . CnpiLa1 I m~ ·cvcmcn t..s Plan -197 1 1.0. St..o.rm Orainn gc Plan -1.971 X 3. Boi e !'"ly dc-~c • iUc , in '"l u:'\nt ifi:.ablc lt_·rms to th e C'-lcnt ro ... ~ib1 c . tho rna~nitudc of the p.--olJ1cms ur nccd.s idcnti - n c d in 2 . • A s yno psis o£ th e pl.-oblcms and n eeds idcnt.i.Ci.cd in. t.hc above rcpo.rt.s i.nc1udc ·Lhc 1"ol.1o·wing: ~. J\pproxjJnat.cl.y 7-l.O percent o.C -t.hc <.lv:c 11ina units nrc sub- st.andnrd . Ncnr1y onc-hal.r o~ tile sul>standnrd units nre b. c . loc.:::t1.cd 'v l.1..1tJn 1..he .five ·•Arens or Concot,n••. The rcmn:indcr oL 1..he subs1..andnrc1 unit.s arc ~cat.t..crcd throug hout tho c:it.y • Rcdc-vc1.apmc nL is t..h e mn jor cha11cn~e :in providing adequate housitig in the CO!JHt un.:it..y. Suc h rcdcvcl.opl.lCn.t w:i)_l. rc s ul.t in di sp l.ac cmct~t o~ mnny r ant:i l.i cs ~ cdpcc:ial.l.y 1..11c cl.dc1-l.y ~ which wl.l.l. )l CCc~si.ta 1..c a coordJJlatcd llou s:i nc and rcl.ocat~on program . Storm dr;"t.:inn ~c is o:f m.ajor concern to the citizens of EJlg1cwooct n1'd a $6 m:il.Jjon proarnJtt ll nS bccJ~ dcv c l.opcd and w:i 11 b e :impl. llt::"'ll L e d to hnndlc n ~-yc-:1.r st.orm... S c vc1-a1 ot:>port..unit..jcs n1·~ provid e d £or joi.n1..-U:':i:1[:'C projects in whic h drnjnn c:c\·/:'lYS '\•:i.J1 -bc utili:;.o:c cl t..o provide open green sp;:t.CC and SOJ1lC r ~crc-:-ttjono.1 u:s:l.gc. d. J'mprovcJ•tcn.t.. or t ra£Ijc cjrcuJ.n.tion .is key to 1.-hc conLj_nucd hcnJ Lh o£ t.hc <;:OJ.uaun.i.Ly :).l,.~c.._l t..o it.~ ability t.o he1p i.Lsc1£. J3o t.h L.hcr t r:-t Jl!"":"C nnd J ong rn ng-c :i J•lprovcr-tcn 1..s arc .rccout...!C lldcd .. • • T 32X [ - - --- 3 . (Cont:i.nucc.J) e . ..n'lc com muni. t.y cnn. be bc'l. t.cr served by a series of scvern1 neighborhood and COJrlltUnit.y parks rat.her t.ha n. a J..j:mit.ed 1'\\.unber of' co1run un.it.y parks . 'll"lis has been imp1crnen1..cd throur;h t..he park rcpl.accmcnt prog-!"'am . £.. Capital. Improvements have been projcct.ed to sol.vc t..he pl.:obl.CJ•tS and needs no'f..cd i.n C 11 d , and e. above . and proposal.s or t.hc l:orkabl.c Program wil.1 sol.ve the probl.cm s in a and b noted above . -- T 32X I[ - - X"- xs- • • • • • -.. 1 1UD-10~1 (\l...C.&) IJricny clcs cribC 0 i n (:unnt i D:1blc t cnn.,;: to tJ,c C" ... l c nt J)O !=S ihJc . the fj, c o:-S i:o..-yc-::u-go::t-l.t:f or t ar&cfs f or ;::...c- c ompl hdu .• cnt in rucetiu~ U:o J.H ob l cms or needs indic..."l-tcd in 3 ... Sec Page 7A. 13.-ic:-ny dcs cr ibc l h<" nction progr:'\rns t O bc undcrt31.cn in t he ne-xt ce-rtification p <"riod fo mcct the n ccd s. and c s tiraa1cd bud.r;c-tl!" f o r such rro::;.r::tm'S . incl udin.:; c:-p i t 3 1 i mprovrmcn l s b udget. - Prior to the submission or our a.pp1i.ca.tion :for an Urb::tn Ren ewa l. Pr.:>-gl..~nm . we cannot.. .jud g-e t..hc budget .:Cor the p1.·ograin . JJo wcvcr . th e 1:'ol.l..owing: Capital. I mprovcJncn.t.s have been appJ.·oved by t..hc Cit.y Council. £or Area ''A'': 1 . S'l.orm Drni.n!l.ge ........... $147 ,195. 2 .. Fire Substation Cot~St1·uc'l.io•~ ......... $10 u.ooo. 3.. Gr enb 1t Program ••.•• $125 .. 000 . 0 1:hcr Capita 1 X mproveillc nts P r ojects cn.n be .round in 1..he ~ t..ta.chcd Cnpi t.a 1 I mp.l.~ov emen ts P~-ocr;lm r eport.. A ttn.chmen. t -7- \ ! .,- • I' 32X • [ - - - - - 0 - P'.'\GE 7-A -1.. The prim:t ry J!"On 1 o..f the \VQr a bl..c Pr<>t.;rnr.t is t:o t.rcn t Are a ·•J\" o£ 1.hc .:\rcas oL Concc1·n t.hrouu;h ur;:lnn. Rcnc·.va1 , prcCc ... :a bl..y t..h cour:h Lhc ,.c it;"h Jorhood D~vc1op~ncn. t.. Proc;ram .. It is hoped th n t Lrc::.. t.mcnt of i \rca ••A" cou1d be c :.\pl.etcd ... ..,i t.h.i.n .:Ci ve years . T l tc olhcr Area s oL Concern wi11 be Lrcatcd itt the .Co~lo,vJ.n~ order: "C", "E ", ••J3 ", ••o" .. A llo •sing Authority (h:ts bccn/.i.s being ) .:Cormcd to mee t the housing needs o£ the communi. ty . P1.·i.m ary emphas is .fo r 1..hc housing pr c~r::un wi.11 be to mee t the n eed s of sc n.i.o&.-c.i.ti.:zcns and rc1oca tion .. Such housing, primn.ri.1y f or 1ow and m od erate income groups , wi.1l. b e d.i.spcr.scd t.hroughout the COm.J.nun .i.ty . L easing o.L ci. ty-owned 1and .fol.-constructio n o f hous.ing b y non-pro£~t pr~vat~ groups ~s be~ng pursued . Cont em porar y nppro!lchcs to zoni n g ,. such as Pl.anned Development , w.i.1 1 be ut..il.izcd to encourage pl.~~vatc devcJ..opmcn t of h.ou s~ng . I n addit~on , t:.l~e City l~as approved participa t io n by residents of En.gl.C\"\..:'"'.Jd in the Federal. Rent. Supp l.cmcn t Program . (Sec :l.ttachJile nt ). The C~ty n 1 s o ~ntcnds to p1~cc new emphns~s on hous~ng and rcdcvc1opracnt .in the new Dcpa~·t.mcn t o.f Comrn.unit.y Dcvc 1op:n cn t by. the appointme nt of :ln. .Ass~st.a nt D~rect:or \Vhosc primary rc spons.ib il.~t.y it w i..l.1 bC" t.o coordina te the s e prog rams . This .Cun.ct~o n will. also ~ncl.udc rc s pon_sib~1~Ly .Cor rcl.oca.tion . In addit.i.on, an Urban R enewa l. Authority (is being/has been.) c~·c at e d w l~~cl~ (w.i.l.l.. be/is bc.i.J,g ) c l.os cl.y coordittatc d with tl~c otl~er City prog rams rnenLio n.c d . 1\ n::t..jo1.· pl.a.nning s tudy of the approx.i.mate l.y one square m ~l.e C ore Area ~s proposed for 1972 . TI ~~s study arcn .i.l~cl.udes vi.rt.u:1.11y a1 1 of .-\.rca of Concern ••c ·• and \V i11 be .financed b y C:i ty nnd pl.·:iva Le interests . Plans for tho devc1opmcn t a.nd rcclc v c1opmc nt o£ the Core ~\rca w.i.11 resu1 t frOL"'l this s tud y . (Sec at. t.nchrnc n t ____ ). The Cnpi. Ln.l. I mproveme nts Pro~ram p1.·oposcd .Cor 1972-1976 . w~11 rcsul.t it ~ City cxpcl ~d~t~lr cs of approxi.matc1 y $10 m i l.1 io n and arc ent.uncra L e d in t.hc n Lta.ch cd Capi t::11 T rTt provc - Mcn t.s Pro£!rnm repor t. En!:"1C\:ood School. Distric t •.vi 11 ex- pend S2 .. 6 J,t.i 11ion .:Co~-Cnp.itn.1 YJ .tp1·ovenc n.ts over the next tuo years ~ncl.udi1~g the cotlstruction of a11-purposc rooms a t eJ chen tn 1.·y sc hoo1s \\hic h cn n be uti l.izc d as commun~ t.y rooms i.n eac h •~ci g hbo1.·hood. • -- - - n.J.:so • .... Lt.i" LO~-t .!~0 . --- A l .. r_·~~·· -~ Et .·a.· 5 e=-:-----~---s,..;~t..t ;:;:;s o~· .1c:)70 .... '-;'>.9. n·:sg{-;,~~i.~1 ':r;~?-~~ii~.,~~gJ-~~~~?,L_~~~.-,~G~~;T~~~,d'~;,?'-';~o~~~~n-~~~~-- c. '~ ·, ·<--. \·.-:~~R::-:.,."\S ., u:-~dcr the p.:::-ov~sioJ~s of S ection 101 of 'l:h'?. Eou s i.;,g an d Urbr.n D e · .. ·e !.o.;,:::.:n.~nt. r.ct of l965 , t 'le S cc1.-eta ~x-- ?f J-iousing and U =ba n_ D e velop:-:1 c nt is a ut:.hori.z.ccl to cn~cr b ...... '~ ... '-~:::~~ ~~~~f~~~~ i';~u';'I~; ~~~;r:"~~\'~-~~~ifP~f"'~~;~;,~~c~cl.---'<~- l.c· ........ -:..nco=-=.e ::~-=-.;ni l.i.cs '--~o ~=c clC:c~·J..y . h <==.:-ld i.c a ppcci , dis- p)&c c d , v ic~i~s o~ n a tura l dis aster , or occup3nts o r sc~stan ~~r ~ hous.i.ng ; an d l-.:~!l.:--:.~s, t 'h c p::..·ovi.si.ons of sa:id Scc~i.on 10 1 Cc""!nnot.:. b e m ade ava.i.1ab1e to hous.i.~g o'~c rs ~n cartmin 1oca1.i.t.i.cs u~1css the ~=~a=n~ng b=~~ o~ t ha 1oca ity h as by r c~o1u t'cn g.i.v2~ LP?=ova l ~or ~uch •=~Jci?~t.i.o~ .i.n t~c Fc•cra 1 E\.~n"C Srp,:->le.;=..~:"l~ ?::-ogra.Jn ; -!''0~ ... -.. ".i"'.E=:?...;-..::·o.R.-;::, be .i.~ ::.-cs.c>J..v ~...J. b _ ... ~he c.i.t:.y c ou nC5.~ of t!•~ C.i.!...y o~ 2 :-1:·;;'"1 e,.·ood , co1 o.L·.:'l.d o r..a f o11o;.-.·s : .. ;;p ~>~o va1 ~2..-e ~.:;.y s:t.-~nt:cd !:"oz.-p4!.!.-::.:ici.~.:::.-;.:.i _on. in t.:.h c F .::::C!e:..-.:!.1 r:..-.nt St~p?2 c:-::=.c :1t:. ?::-oc;-::.--r_-a !:>y q:c~1 i.f.i.cd hou s .i.ng c· . ._'"':"1e:..·s a= '::>:::'"coe::-ty l.oc~'"'-'::.cC i.n !:.he ci.:....y of r:ns-1 c-..-:oo<..l , Color~'"'!.do . - - l"-.Do?· ... ·:-.:!:l ;.~:;n .""-\.???!;;.:·~n t:.hi.s 197 0 . I , S{:cphcn 7' •• T.~yo n , c:.: offi.c.i.o city c1 cr ~-TL·c.-:su:t..·~.l:, ~-o•··-hca~-~--~-~Y1 ~~~rct 0.i._!yY 0~-~at tha Cor ago'n g .i.s a true , nccurat c .. .._ '-J ... --'-" -.J Z::::.cso 1\.l!.:ion Uo .. --<../" Serics ,?f . 1 97 0 , t ~C.:.£"sc d v c::.::v COl.!nc:il. on !:.he =....:._ __ d~~, oE ..f2£L-_z.....-1_.,6_, ].9 70 . . -- ,•.,.t:.t.:cst:.: -- \ ! ~ T 32XI • • 1 ·_,.::--t c.:• (1 1 -GS) • • - 6 . 0 ..;:!:~• iL~ t :oc :":.cti •.Jrl 01n·•;_...-:.•s \,;._nt.!. ~-t=o!.cu in t: . ._. l ::t· t ..:c·tliiic ·~tfi o a :·..::riod . ar.d lac ~~~o •~:~t,.:; :1.'\..ti l.t LI~ f er .::H!c!.a :;n~~-ll l '3 . (Far r<"-<"C r:..ifi<"atinn..J u:1 l y.) t:"oL app]_ icab l_c. 7. t. ... Hc:::.lc tl-.o G r o:::'niz.~tions involve d , the nrnocnts c-xp ~ndc d in the l as t cc.rLil1 cation period , n.nd tl1c !!mounts bt:~.:;c!.c d fo r tho next period . to Sl!?por t bot.h tho pl~n~ing and the p~ogr:~.mnir.g portions of the Ftoccss.. _ !l .. Ena1c,..-ood has no t prev i...ous1y hnd ::a. V.'or!..cnb 1 e Program .. b . ~,1c budects Lor the Cit.y ~tanager • s and the Pl.a.n.n:i.n~ Dcpart.mc n.t .Cor 1971. are: Ci. ty :\tanag-er Pl.nn11i.n~ Departme nt C i. ty )tanager $57,916 . $GS ,GGG . Departme nt o f C ot.naun.i.ty Dcvc1opucnt $ $ c . Pnl.·ti.ci.p:tnts .. i.ncl.udc C.:ity Council., Pl.nnn.i.ng Comr.ti.ss.i.o n, Parks n11ct nccrc~ti.ot ' Comn~ss~on , Work~b~c Pro ~ran C~L~zcns • Co mn ~ttcc , S. Li &t t:1 ~t~ ; .... ~. ~t~;!·'!i?Jj'§t~:'l~l 1:!~\;,L}Q.!:];.=J,};,S.pl£-:.\'tfcit':s·i'. Jif,"'l.hc F•oc~s~. :u~d the poo(cs,oiion::tl s!i.i lls involve d. City t anogc .. r · J\Rsi.s L:::tnt Ci-ty .la nngc:t.~ D~POclor o£ P1n.nt,~ng A ss ist3t't DLrccLor oe P1ant,i.ug Ptt;">l.ic \':or <s Di r cc to1.· ULi1iL~cs O~rcctor F.i.nat,cc Director Director oC Parks & R cc1·c at ~o n DLrc~to r oL L~brar y Po l _j cc C h ie f F i re C h..i.c .f . s - • • r 32xl • • 0 - •-tuo-•c~• (11-68) 9. 0 ..!: crib<' thr ro1<" o:" t he chief c.::-..ccuti'I.C :a.d cit) COOJ;'ll.·i1 in f vrn\uht.tinti th~ ob ;~·<.·t iv<"::o . poiotitic.s :t~ocl bud- get $ of tLc pL ~nuin~ pou.;(.".-~ in the 1 :-~:::.l p C'riod. and ''h:tt rol~ tLc y ''ill ho..,,c in t 1-::!' uc ..... t p ~rio ~. if diffc•cnt.. The Ci Ly 1'.1:1-t"':"l.=:;cr , undc~' 1...hc 1.crh1:3 o.£ t.h c Home Hu1c Chart.cr , is t.hc nch:\.i.ni.st..ra t.ivc head o~ t..h.c CiLy Govcrnlncnt and j _s 1"CS pous i- bJ.c :for t.hc i•np1cmc n.ta1...ion. o:C C:i.1..y Counci1 po1jci..cs.. The pri.•~ci.pn 1 vchi.c 1 c £or review o£ p1nnni.ng processes at'l.d priorities is throuc;h t.hc Annua1 13udg:ct.. The Pl.~nnj_ng D e pn.r tmcn. t budget :B sub:n.i.L ·tcd to t.hc City Alann:;c.l.-:Cor revi ew and i.nc1u sio-.'l i.n the to1..a1 Ci.Ly l3udgct submi.1..1..c d "Lo t.hc Ci.1..y Counc:i1.. hlajor pl.'iorities arc reviewed in d e tail. du.l.~ing t..h.is p .l.-ocess . Prior:i1...i.c s cst.abl..ishcd nnnunl..l.y as n part o.f the Capi"Lal. I11prove- mcn1..s Pro gram are al.s o iMport.o.n.t a s a prim.nry method o.f impl..e- mcnt.ing 1...hc COJil prchcnsivc Pl..an.... 'l~h.c proceclure jn.vo l.vcd i n. a ...... - proval. of t..h c Capital. :J m provc ;;.t~n.t Prog:ram starts ·w:ith individua l. dcpnrt.mc nt.s s u b:nitt..i n g rcqucs1..s to the City 1\l::tn.agc r . The City Mnn:-a gcr re:Ccrs th e requ ests to the Pl.:-an.nj ng Co::m11.i.ssi on. :Cor a rC COll1mcnda t.i on o::C priorities . The City .. tanager, a:Cter reviewing t.h c rcc<>-:mn.c-nd a ti.on o~ t.hc Co11mJ ssio n., submits t.h c proposed p:..-ogrnm t.o t.h e Ci.t..y Council. ior rcvicv .. · and approval.. 10 . O c:=cribc 1Lc-role o f the m:tjur l oral a:; •nc i C'-"l :lnd org.'lniz:.ti on:-in d c ,·~l o;>in g the> pl~n.s nnd ac-tion p rogra ms :1nd in C(oorUin ,fin~ tlu:·ir it.lpl<-;nc-nt:-lion du:"in;; 1hc p:.~t p c·riod, and ''h:"!t r o l e tht:-y "ill h ::"~ in the next p eriod . if difrc-rcnl. L ocn l. :1g: nc.i s :tnd org.::oonizat.:ions rcpl:cscn ...... c d on t.hc v:Orl;;;:nb1e Program Cit.i.zcns• Comni..t.t.cc an.cl ac1..ivcl..y .in.Yo1·vcd in dcvc1opi.n.g pla ns ::..n.d act..ion proc;r m.s ::t.nd who wi ll.. be in.vo1v d .in 'l.h.e i mpl.cmct~lat.i.on arc: C.it.y Counc:i.l. C:it..)· P1:tnning. t'.;;. Zonin!; COlo:Jn .ission. P;;1rks &. Rccrcntion. Co .. n.mjss i.on Ron.rd or Educntion J ... C:l(;'UC of. \':o;ncn. Votol·s F.ng1cv:ood H igh School. S'l.udents 1c'l.l.~o Denver rair Jiousj ng Ccnt..cr Itl'l.cr-Fni.'l.1t Tas1~ Force Sou1.h Suburb:::tn Bonrcl o-C n cal..t.ors Nor t.hwcst En :::;J e,..-ood Y mprov men 1... Asf-:ociatj on. En.g1cv:ooc1 ::\1in..is1..c.r.inl. Al.l.i ancc J :'\.'Ht::tn n.c1at..ions Col.•ncil.. Ci~jzCll-at-l.argc Ch:unbc1~ o:C co •• n.tcrcc ./\1so sec :l1..t n.chcd minutes o:C t..hc v:orl<:-:.bl.c PJ.~o~ratlt Ci1...i zc us • CommJ tt.cc . -!)- II • • T 32X - - - - tcU D~lO&l (ll-6!:) - 0 - Thi -= cleme n t contains rec1uir£!r.oc.,t s , .. ith r s p c ct t o both the c:-o ro o ~!tunity~s u c tl f or hou s ing nn~ 1-hc need f or cffcc:h·c. r c l o CHt i o n prvz.r~m s . ,-.·hic-h o.:.rc t rc:1 t c rl separatel y bclo,,·. I denti fy and ana lyze t he gnp bcto\CCil the con.J;.:cni ty•s l o\\·-and 1:\oUCra!c-i nco:nc housing nc<·d'"" ;:nd tl~c rc s:ocrcce-:t ,aiJ a L !c t o r.u:·ct the n eed. and deve l o p and i mplc:ncnt n m e a ning- f ul ac ti on pro:;r .. -u -.t t o l;.c l p 0\·crca.!lc the ga p. 1. O n t he bas is o f p :-cscntly ~'n ilah !c info r m at i on and l Oc:llly det ermin e d El::!.nd::u·ds . provide 4!-Ll estimate o f the nu mber o f l o,v-~n d r.lodcra tc-incor.t c r~m i li c-s p;-c.s=cnt ly l iving in .suh"""t::tnd a •·d hous i ng. by rotcc . and the n um- ber o ( £.l :ond +!rd h o u !"in;; unit s prC".,c nt l) vaClnl and ::1'\:ail~b l c:! :tt pricC"s or rent a ls s uch f :-mi li cs C:ln 3 ffo r d to p:ty . F:thn i.c Group D1::t.ck Indian Spa ni.. ~h O r icnt.a1 l ":'hi.t..c To~n1 D ~c l.1i.tl g Ul,~~s Y ncnncy n.:: .. t.c Va c ~nl D ~c 11 i n g tl ~ts 10.4G4 0 .. 5~ 52 _ S~tb stn •~d nrd Dwc11~ng Un~ts Tot a l. 13 25 261 15 561 875 2. n .:-~crib_. h.,, .. ~. t h~ ::o b !)'e e ~ti:n ~t c ".,. ..... r."l:>dc-, 31\rl: ,-.h ~t p1.t n<; the comJ.atn iry h aa to rle,C"!o :., on a co:1-tinuing b :t~i $ ~n ::--.c r•·rat c i rn e>:l t ot y of Jon-:"n J r-l o.lc..'r :t tc-i n c omc h o~ts ing n ~c:-d s :J.nd r c-.s ources . Above cstjpt ni...cs were ba s e d \..a pon in:form::tti..on .Crotn : 1 960 Census Report by En~1cv:ood School. Di st:t.-.ict.. -2/70 L nnd ·u sc S~udy -1 97 0 Prc1jlnil,n.ry Yn..Co rmnt..:ion---llousj ng St..udy -1 97 0 d--".-.'-/--., Sout.h Suburban Board o£ R cn 1t_ors "J"h CJ t..y :i s i.nit..intjn:; n. da1...a i.n"Cor:rnati..ori syst.c111 '\V h i.ch. YJi.11 store nnd b e COl 1lit,ltn11y u p-dat.cd ,._.i.'Lh h O\.lSi.n g lJ 1 ancl u se 1 and othc.r dnt.:l p c .l.·L.in c nt 1.o t..hjs progr::un . ll~£o nd3 L~Oll jn t •1 abo ·c w~J1 be ~t p-da L cd Ll~rou gl' ann l.y Ri.s of 1 970 Cen s u s d;:'lta . -10 - -- I' 32X - - - - 0 -.. ti\ .. 'D·lOC ) (11-<>8) I c _ <"r i1,u i a (j.U.•n ri fi.•!)1<" h:l .3 t o t ~ co~ .. ( .lt f'!'.o• i 1 1.-.. t!tc cu;.lrilun it) •,J: t:n& .. ·t~ r.,. ::.cro: .. ;J Ji ::;::ro~.l t. :co n ..I tho ~pc~ific . ..::t ~p s :1u J ~\.-l i e n~ i t. i ''"•" '5o t o '4·!.1':! in t h~ n ~·.t ~c.rt i f!c.!li o,a ;'· ri o d to c-:..p :tnd the -.,.u :l~ly o f 1 o~v - .;.'IHI hlot!.::r~t c ·in co;,.._C! h cu.:i.n;:;. (:-::uc!t c~c.::rd;-U c .a s !:~u ld i nc l u d .:! il:.:::-nt i fi ,·:~tiun o f th e s ;,H~C.ili c F"""o:!c r ."l 1 o r <>ll H.•r ci-t rro,cr:ua3 to b :! u ~c: '· th:c !:!.: on!1'or•«:ti;» o f l h-:3 p tO!'\V'•ct-1 p.o.::;r ;o: 1 • s <..t t us .,f fin :":nc i a l corfuu itl!lCnts f c ;r fhc l 'oo j ;."c."f S 0 :-tn d c-s.t i~a.t..c-d ~~tcs f er i.1iti :1 tlo !1 :.:t~"!d COJ;r.zp!c li o :'l o f c on:...t !"l.J cticn o r n::!t ;~!Ji!it;.:tion.) The Ci.ty ..... ·ccor::n.izes its re s ponsibi1ity rc1ativc to taking action to meet the needs for ~ and expand the supp1 y of~ 1ow-and moder atc- incouc housing o.nd has take n the :Collowin.g positive steps : 1. A Housi.ng Authority (has· been/is in. the proc ess of i.:>eing ) ere::.. ted . 2. The 1972 Budget establishes a Dep artme nt o.f Comm unity Ocvelop- met~t wi th at~ Assi.sta.nt Director to l~avc responsibilit y £or Housing uud Redevelopment Iuncti.ons . The Assistant Director wi.11 develop ho~tsing o.t~d 1 ·e lo c ati.on programs and will ~:~sis t the lf ~:...,si ng nn.d Urban Rcn.e wa 1 Authorities . This staff .Curiction is be:i.tg es ta !>lis hed to a£.firm the importance o£ the housing · nnd rcdcvclopr.1.en.t .functions and to provide the expertise n ecess ary to develop v~able progra.ms . <1 . D e s cribe the s tl"pS t a~cn and the acco m i llishmc nts '-'~de dHring tho l :a.s t pcrioJ -... ith respec t to cxp~nding the supp ly o f h ousina f o r low-and r.:orl..:!'r2.t~·inco m c f ami lies. • ,ot o.pp1icnb1e . 5. I d ~n!ify t.ho pulil ic :l!:;::"nc y or offici!\) r a.s t:ons ib l o f er ovc r-.'!.lt direction in forrnul:!.ting r..nd i r.t p1cr.tcnting the h o :1 s in3 pro.:!r:~m , nnrl d ..,.ecdb~ tho r c b.t!o n s hip o f :suc h n ::;cncy Or offici~l to t h~ chie f exccutivo of Lho coz.t ::ntnity. At the pre s en t time., t.hc City does not. have YJhat it ,-,ou].d consider to he n.n ;-tclcquatc housi.ng program . Current .responsi.bi.1i.ty is in. · the Planning Department.· A s prcvious1y stated ~ the 1972 Budge t calls for creation oE a Oepo.r t mc nt of Corn.muni ty Ocve1opment wit h an A s si.s tnrtt Director i.t' c J,ara c of ench of £our LLlllCti.onal areas ~ o£ which Housi.ng at d Rcde ... ·c1opnc n ·t i.s one. This ..i"unc.tion w.i.1 1 include the Wol.·I·ca.l.>lc Pro ["~l.·nm ~ Rcdcvclopr.tc n. t ~ Housing Progran~ and Rc1ocn ti.on Services •. Also . n. Hous ing .\.utilo r ·ity (h as been/is bei..ng) created . with whic h tile sta£1" wi11 ,·.·ork · 11 • to cstal.>.l.ish housi.ng-programs: • -- r 32x • • f1U D ·10E1 (ll -6S) • 0 - ~< G. n,. C"tib~ e ..... ,,J ;.;.•l<;. of +~•1 ... :\ :·~· 0<".) or offici::t.l f or-J.lol.tilbdn.c, :::.11 n. .. ~n ~u t c p !..1 b l ic 2n ~ J"o i\,O{C ~~u u:-ccs in o od""r (:> h co !p ov-..r(;Q .• oc t ! .... J, .J-...l•• . .: G-Jl i n t.h~ c omtdl.lni ly. A d~rc c~ rc1a~~Oll f-lt~p cx~~~s bc ~~c c n tl1c an swer ~o ~h~s q~tcsL~on nnd ~1tn~ s~vc11 Lo 1ltc p~ev~ous qu cst ~on . O ur ~l~~tja1 p1nl~S ca11 :for u1..:i1i:z.j n.(;" t.hc Jl ou~;:inr; J-'\ut.hor:ity nn.d 1..hc Ass:ist..an.t Dircct.o :r o.r Co,.un un:it.y D ~vcl..opJ~tc n'l £or llou ~i.nr;: and R c:..:d c vc1opJr..C n.t.. t.o mobi1.i.zc Lh c pub1lc nnd pr~voLe resources Lo overcom e U•c hou s ~ng ga p ~n 1..h c co;,,_mu ni. t..y .. A1so • t.hc \',"ork ab l.c Pro g raM C:i t:i..zcns • Co1runi. t L ee lt as indicated u:i11iltgltc ss n11d :interes t.. :in mob:i1izi n g t.hcsc £orccs .. R E J .OCATIO:-: The d co,·cl opmcn t of a c~ntrn l l y -rH~J01 i nl ~l c r-cd or c oon::l in ~dcd r e l ocati on p 1·o gr::.•m ro r a ll r ami li es REQ1JIIT'E~TS. and i nd h itiu:t l s di .s placcd by t;ovcrnrnC!n(:t l act_ion in t he community ; t h o provi !"'ion or a ~u rn cicnt '·olun1e c.r decent .. sa r e 2-n d so.nif ::a ry ·ho u ::=inz '' ithin the mcnn.s o r such di s p l acecs in appropriate uni t s i zes ; and . the p ro,-i $ion o r SCr'\icc-s t o " such di s pl acc-C!.s com p ;trab l e to t hose ~n .. Je r lh c urh ~a rc-ne'\·.a l p :-ognun . - 1. \', i1 ll rc ~p cc l to a~£>n c i c-s :1 av i n~ r lt"~ponsib i fitics r or r l oca ti on in the communi t y . gh·c t ho r o11o'' ing i nronna - tion: Th e 1\:'\~~C' o r t he Jc.C':'"J :"t;C'IlC)" r-cl t.t i n ::S t c.r i nz t he r c-1o r:"ti on r :-o~:-::am und("r u:-b ~n renC'\'o":.'\f 0 i nc l u ding tho d c t c.mia::ti co a o r r~h ou.:c ing n cc.J .t=. Uc ,·c t co ;J i ng p1 ~n .:;;: to a.•c-ct .scch n 't"cds r·nd ... r u'\ icli nti r ~l o C'at i o n asz:.i s t- ancc. U rb~n R c t1c ~a 1 ~s ,,ot prc sc nt1y b c~rrc u~~~~zc d by the C~Ly . ~t~urc 1"c1ocnt~ot' serv~ces ma y be pro '·~d~d by nn Urbn1' n cncwa 1 J\ut! ... nrj_"Ly . a Ji ousi.nr; 1'ut.hori.t.y , or by a Cit.y OC"p:-.rtmcn.t. • .. '>(' b. T he n='"l'£' o r t \-::!' l o =:t l ;l~C"nc y ... ·~•ini ,....t!:'"dn!; t !lc r :;;o loca t ion PI"'Ctir:l t'l f e-r t .O£C ~j,..p l,cccl ll) other go'\Crn- rn<>ata l :tctir.n . i nch·r!int:; t he c•<"t c-n ~lin :'l ti c.il or r c :•ou;:o in:.; n c.c•"!-s . dc-,·c-1 :_,ir.z; pl :-•. .n s to 1.1cct such t:<"cds und providin[! r lt"l oc:!tion :t.S~i stn ncc • A s oC Jnn.\.t:-tr y 1, 1972 , n O cpa rt.ment o£ CO~hmuni.t.y O c vcl.op m c n.~ wi.11 b e crcn t.ed , 01'e o~ Ll1c rcsponsi.b~J~t.~es oL wl,~c1~ wi1 1 b e r~1ocati.on . The A s!---;_i s "Lnnt O i .rcct.or .Cor 1I o u s~n g: and H edc vel.opme nt v1i.J l. set up and a<lm j n.i.s1.c J• t.h e r c 1ocation prog 1.·nm • • • • • • 0 - HU0·10B ' (1 1 -C>C) If t he au~\.\:'OS t o:::. :!nd b. :.•ho'<" i ndic:.-~tc diffcr<"lll agc nc-i c-$. c.h_•.:::;.cr-i b c in dc•tn il h o"" t he ir 1 <"'"'J)&.·\.:th.c r ..:-.-i .,c:l:-iL;Ji tics arc eoot .. lin .l.~<c d a-to nee--d t lctt:rn~i:l.:ttion""'~ p rogn1m J'l ):t_nnin:;. :tntl the pro" i ~i on or r.:!l oca- t ion :.t,:>;.:-i""l::tncc . Not. npp1j_ca b~e. d. O C"sc:·ribc in dcC:d l ''ha t s teps or :lC"lio01.S t.hc c oma·nunity I "~'"O l,O SC!S t o t a J...c in the nc~~t v criod to rc ' i cw. cv:t l u:1te and i n'lpn.-.. ·c coo rdin ::tion :tmo:-;g the a.gc-ncics mC'ntiunC'd in c . above. No t app1ica.b1e . 2 . tf th<" c om:-.-tuni ty h a,;. di.•pl::ec-d r::~m ili c::: or bu -=-i n(.·:,>~<"3 f ron1 Jt t:D-a .s.;;.i~tcd projec-t s ::u~d 'or other govc-nlr.tcnl!ll action p ror;o:tm"' tl urin;; the-p rc c c in,t;. t n·o-yca r p eriod e-nding _ (~!oll:l. and } <L-•.u) g ive the f nllo\'1. int; inf o~m:t ti~n: NUL"UZ::R OF F,.._••IL..IC:S 6osP~ACED (A.t tOt -----------1 -~-·,::-~ii~T "t') L~·;.~~~~$"4 u e n -::t,<::-i~t<"d P ooj <"ct.s . -----------1------ Co c t:nforcc-mc-n t. . . . ~ot App?--ica b1e -------------------1-------11----+------------- ll i:_:;!n .. ay C-on ~truction . ~----------------- O t l u•r (/Jrs.tih) .•••• +----1--------------1-·----1----- Tot a l . • J o;k-n tify lOS t o ~~"n fe h-A•nc-ri c::on. N'C'C: .. ""· 1\<"'C'Tlcnn TnC::ian ,.nd Orl<:nt h l F.J"Oups • • ._ l l c.oo . .,.;.in;:: '\ohi~io I ::K no t in con f or..nil};" .... -Hh co c• i.~ c !(C"ct i.n lhc. c ommunity. -1 3- • • • r 32x • uuo-tC.B t (ll -6S) 0 - 1)1(": ,·til.Jc-d the-hind.:;;, of ;'-·l oc:.ttion :.-en. icc,.-. h <·in:; l 'o.,id, db) t h"" c o;r.mun it) to P"'-.. r~on-:ulll b u~in,•.s:,.<.•s l.u:;in~ di.::-JJ1ar~l ~ (c .g. iu -p C'Ctio:t of h OH~ in g ::I' a iLt.bJc f ·•r n.-Jo,::>l iun . int<"'t• iC -'1. ino, :-nd <"0\"H~C"tino of p :..•r -Oil~ bc-int; di -pl acc • :-'jtil C'nl f ur ),;nulling r <>10C":\Iivn J""':l :!>r.u:otr.-. <· t:\bli ~!l .• ~rn t of l.ou .... ing :1nd olh t:r r c-!'cn--al .-cn.iC"<"s). and Gi'c l1 ~ .. -atnoun t o r f und~ :Haihlhlc to p r o-.itl ~ the .::-CI .. icc~- A coord~1'a~cd p~·ogrn1~ ~or Lllc prov~s~o 1 ' o£ rclocat~on scr v~ccs docs not prc:3cn t.l.y c~·:ist. in. En.e;l.c·wood.. TI"lc .fol.,_o'\ving croups 1...ry 1..o coop.cra1...c in t.hc p .1:ovi.si.on of rcl.ocat.ion services : Ut..i..J..i.·tics Dcpart.mcnt (v acan i.cs), 13ui.l.di.ng Oepart.mcn.t (Inspectors ) 11 H ca 1toJ..-s (vacnnc~cs), Churches . Iut c r-F a~Lh T ask Force and Arapahoe County v:c1farc D cp nJ..-t.lnc nt .. It i.s recognized t.hat 1..hc 1ack o:C a coordinated program i.s a se rious prob1cm. 4. I f the-c c:-t:nun il) \\i ll di ··placc f;~rti l i c-~ :tnd l_,u;-ifH·s.Sc-d frc..~., lll"l)-:--.,..:-'i::O t cd projc<:t -and/o!" by oth~r Govern- m enta l ac-li o n p r o ;;r.o"ltn5 durin~ th e corr:ing, h~ o-yc:tr p c-riocl , &h c I h e f o ll on ing informa tion: ---------- Cutlc-Enfo :-ccr:lcnt .......... _ ----a:e_p -__i.c~1..J.-O.!_l__2.~ .?.~p 1 ctcd . l :i:;hv •. ty Co;t _~l nu:·ti on ••.•.•• -------------------- Otl u.-r (/.!r uli{J ) ••••••••••• ld,nt i J'").· ...... t o S;-..,,...l r h -.1\•ne r icn.,. N ccro. A n·.o.·oicO'U'> J:u.!in1 ..,n.t 0::-l~t.,.t ~rc.ur -. nn.:ll ci ... -· c s li>nn!c• o f p•;.po.-1lonr.. v.·h ... r.;-... ._ r poG,..Ibl c. -1·1- I '! • • '32xl - - I I i-( • • • - HU0-1091 (11 -6&)- 5. F or t he n uml.H:r or f u .. m ilic,.... .shO\\Il in ~1 auo,·c . inllic-:ttc t!oci r incoznc b rac1-.ct s :.!.nd thc-r.uJnbcr o f s t :::u tdard h ou!'3i ng unit ~. both n(.q , .. • a nd cxh:ttin::;. th:ll"i ll be a'a.ilabJc for such f n.mi li c..s di s-ph•c-cd duriug that period. I denti fy the eour ccs o f data. • Unknown uuti.1 Urban Rcncv:n.l.. appl..icati.on i.s compl..ctcd . F'or a 11 OC\\" hou "'ing l o be a,·aila hlc to di~p1 acc d f al'!1i 1i cs, as indiC":ttcd abo,·c, idf"'nlify the numbc.r of unit8 f or hom co,,·r.c r s hip or re-nt a l . projec-t scL-,tu~. c~lira:tt('"d completion date-, nn d f or f cdcr:l t1y ::t..SsiE-lcd prO gr:lr.H;-, tl!c p.-ojcct number if a.ss:ign(.'d . Unknown until. Urban Rene\.v:t.l. app1i.c.ntiou is comp l.ctcd. -15- • • r 32xl - f lUD-108 1 (11.-<.8 ) • 0 - G. If the comm~111i ly ni ll di :o;pl:lcc ~iu.:;l c p .::-r-~on,$ by l lt.;l)-a ~::;h tcd p roj ec t s and/or other G,O'\.C"nl mcnO.::~.I action durir..:; the f o iiO\\.·in::; h '\.·o-ycar p eri od . r;ivc Lh e f a ll on in~ infoor.1:-.tio:w: th" nur~bcr to b e rli S J .~!;;.ce d. I h e i r r ace. the income l c-.·c t s of tho s e to b e di .s pla.ccd . t.he ty p~ o f lu>u,..ing rc!3 ourccs to b e a vail :lb 1c (e.g. ro om!ng an-::1 b o:u·ding h ouses. r c .f' idcntial h ote l s . h ous in~ and h omes f or the clc.Jcrly. other). Unlt.no ... v n. un1...i.1 Urban R cncwa 1 a pp13..c a t.i.on i..s com p1ctcd. X 7-\l h a t llrc I he CUlTCnl v aca ncy r:t.tc-s in the C<:>J olMUr.ity f or the inven-tory o f s L~n d 2.rd 1::-·.·-·-::and r.1odernte-incomc h ou .o:i n g unit-=. by numbC"r of b e roo :ns :-nd ren t s o r ~o":onrhly h ous i ng expenses? Ito, •• •.ere the rates d e ter- mined ? • The ovcrn.J.l.. vacrt.nc y rate is cs1.j_mn.1.ed to be 0 .5 % (South Suburban Bonrd o.:f n cn l..tors ). The remaining reque s ted :informa tion :i.s not currently ava:i.1nbl..c . lG- • • r 32x [ - - - --- ( ( --- .... HUD-lCi;l (1148) X 8. If the vacancy r a te o f !!>l:tnd ?rd units (in t hC" groups , .. h ~rc· the r ent oo rnonth1y hou~in :; ~'-f'C!Il ..,.CS a nd llU111bcr o( b c drooons r .:-ui...-cd b) pcrE-ons b e ing d i .s pluccd) i s l c,o:;s l h ::t n 3 percent. t.hc n dc.=o c ri bc t..ho ::~cti o n s the co:a- n,unil) intend s to t ::al.c to •cplaca on a one-to-one b a.sl s the u.!litS to l...c rcn-:o.,·cd f1o ~-t 1hc ~upt~l) by any lllJO- a ssi s tcd prog•-~m s during t!•c nc'-t b vo-y car period. (Such de ~cription ehould inc lude iJcnlificalion o f the s p eciOc Fcdo;ra l or other aid pro:,.•·n!.li\.S to be u s ed . the spon.sor.ehip of the p r ojcct.s. s t ::o t u.:s of On:tncial com- mit m ents f o r the p•-o j cct~. and cstimnted d ::l.tcs fo r i niti::ation and compl clio;1. of con truction.) X t ~s rccogn~zcd ~~~a~ under the p roposn 1 s ~n c 1ud c d l~erc~n rc1at~ve to code cn:Corccmen t.. and .J..-cdcvc1opl:t.Cn."L there wi11 be a sic;ni:Cican t need :£or rep1accmcnt and rc1ocation housing. TI~c Jlousing Authority ·wi11 be assisted by st.a1:i of t..he D e partm ent o f Comm unity Dcvc1o ~ac nt.. ~n d evc1oping the se p r ograms . Som e d~s cu ssi on , not y et 1:01'"Jnn.1i:zcd , h as occurred in the communit y re1ative to church spoJ~sorcd houFj n g dcvc1opmcnts , inc 1uding the po s~ibi1it y o f 1 casing cit.y-~=ncd 1aJ~d for sucl ' pr o ~ccts . -17- \ ! ~ -- '32xl • • tiUD-1081 (I l ·.68) • 0 <• - .... Tiu:-\\ort...ah lc Pro~un rC'(IHi.-cs c 1c:-tr C'\ id'-•OIC'"C tha.t the community providC's z.nd continues to C''p o..n ..J~ Qppod_uni ti co~ f or c iti zen:;. c~pccialll Lho,.,c "ho are poor :tnrl ru<:.•n,t.crs of minori ty group~. t o p ::rlic.:ipa lc in :1.ll ph a .sc5= o f the r c 1:t tc·d lll "Q-;w _~istc-d r ene ,, a I and hous ing pro- g.-.uns. "J 'hc• parti(.:u l ~ar orga nizalion:..el mC~lllS fo r community in'\olvcmcn t i s l e ft to <-he (]i.scrc- ti on of each coml.,unity. Out the comr.1u nit) mu,.c d cmon~t r:::t c in ils \\orJ~ab lc Progr.tm ~ubm is- ion tha t it pru'\ idc . .s clea r :tnd direct aCCC$-S to d~cie-ion m a hing. rcdc' ant a nd ti me !) informa- ti on , and ncccs.::-a ry t cc hni~.a l :l SS i~tancc to participa ting grouj>S nnd individuaLs in programs cove-red. 1 . (a) Jdcnti fy chc groUJ>S p:u1icip:t.ling in 1hc IIL'O-n ss i s tc-d llrO,&rams rel a t ed to the Work :tblc Program :and in the cornn1unit) ~s pro;;rnm to expand I he sup}>ly or low-and n•odcra.tc-incomc hous ing. Cit.y Counci l. City Pl..annin.g & Zoni.n:; Commission Parks & Hec.reat.ion. ComJnissi.on. Board o£ Educat.i.on. T_.caguc o.C \';ome n Vo Lers Enf!l.cwood lli.g:h. School. Students 1'.1ctro Denver Fnir Housing Center Intcr-Fn~Lh Task Force South Suburbnn nonrd o£ Rcn1tors NOJ..'thwcs t EngJ..c,•;ood I mprovcme11 t Associ. a ti.on Eng1cwood hl~n~stcr~a1 A11~nncc Jluman Rc1a1..i.on.s Counci1 Ci.ti.zcn.-at-Larg:e Chamber o~ Co::nrn crce (b) 0 C"-c.-ihC" 1h<-l)JlC' of group=: (<'·f:· ehic. ncighborhooct. hou :o;i ng) that :1rc p n rticir>ating. ::tnd lh<" con s tit- u e-ncy r c-prc :--c:-nlcd (e.g . p oo r. middlc·cla.s-""". :'\ego. public houe inc; r c:;;idcnts) • Are a o.£ Concern .. A .. is represented by two persons i.rom the Northwes t Eng1cwood I mprovement Assoc~aL~on . A1 s o. one of Lhc Pl.n n.ning Co:mn j ss ion rcprcscn tn tivcs on. t..h.c Com1ni. t tee resi.dos i.n. Area "A'" .. t1±•~or~1.y a11d 1 ow and moderate ~nco~c residents nre repre s ented by E11 g ~ wood ~ lni.steri.nl. A1~i.~ncc . Int cr-Fa±t.J~ Tnsk Force . l\Ic tro D c nvc1.· Fai.r I lou si n g Ccn.t.cr }"t.lld the Human Rc1a1.i.ons Council.. JS - • • ' r ;. T 32xl - - • ,-, ,-~' ' ' 1_1 1_1 _I I • 0 - F.n~1 cwoo d has~ and is pnrtic.i.p:tti.ng i.n l.hc UUD Ope n Spac e n.n.d F:Lood Insurance Proi,cr:t;;:s t.h.a.~ou~h. the City Coun.c.i.1 11 P"lnun.i.n ~ Conuni.ssi.on. and Par!::s a.n.d R ec r eation COJ1..ltt 1.ssion. The South Suburban. Board of Rcal.tot.~s .i.s participating .i.n the Sect . 235 Hous ing Prograin.. UU0·103 1 (11·63) (d ) O c.:::o::-dbc c rr..,n.s lO ::lchicvc coon.Jination :::J.mong citiLcn p ::u-ticip:ttiori s tructur cs l oca t e d in the. s ame area o r ~\aving s i t,\il::u program interests . The W o1.·l..;;:n bl.c Prog:t.·am Ci ti.z e ns C<>r.tflli. t. t e e br ings tog c th.c'r ti<>Vcrn mc nta 1 ;"lgc n.cics and ·pr i.vntc or::;:nni.zati.ons to attack the b1ic:hti.ne in-t:1ucnces, physica l., socia 1 and economi c, i n the co ~r.t u11i.ty . Tl1.is is the r:!OS t coo1.·di.nntcd atter.t pt i.n Eng l.c w ood, ::~nd hns t..hc oppo rt.un:i.ty to c.££ccti.ve1y dea l. wif..h the pro bl.er.ts ...>£ the rortr.tuni.ty . Tite Co nt1ti.t t:cc is nos t interested :l.n J.t a.!<i.ng the \..-o~·!<:nbl.c Prog:rarn succcssC ul. ns i.n.d.ivi.dua1s a.n.d t hrou g h the or3nt t~z ati.o1tS rcprcsctttcd • -J!) - II • • \ ! :r r 32x I[ • • 1_1 I I -, 1_1 IIUD·10SI (11-C.O) - • - - >( 2. D r:>,..c ribc t1 1c· a 1 n1 11 ~(._·m e nt s or uor;..ing 1 '-.~l :t ti o n '"-'hip s s et up fo provide.-J;r<-UJ.JS :nd indi' id u~1l , opporl u nities ror a CC<"S~ to :•n d p n d .iCiJW li(.lll in dc c i .:~:don-m a t .. ing in the applicable JILO-:J.::iJ:oO I-l C d I)I"""b,•:""~- /\11 orgn.n.:iznt.ions represented on t..hc Worknb1c PrograJt'l Cit..izcns CoJnmi.ttcc hnvc 1..wo vot.i.ng m0111bers who hnvc an opport.unity 1..o 1"u11y p:l.r1..i.cip:t1:c in t.he wo.rJ<.i n g s of the Commit. tee . Ci. ti.zcns groups rcprcscnt.it'C a1'Y area cJ1oson £or tl1c suggested actio n p1·ogrnms wi11 participate in tile p1atlJ1i1lg and imp1eme11tation or th c programs-. . Oc-.,cribc the =:-'tcp.::. ,, hich ha'c be-en tahc-n in re-g ard to t_hc appti_ca blc progn:uas to pro' ide participating group.=; aud inUi, idual s ~ufficicnt information and tc<.·lan1cal 3.3-S I S t:tncc. - Star£ tncJ.tbers or ~he Plant~~~~g Dcpar~mcnt J~avc worked closely w.i.~h the Citi~cns• COlnJnittce. Staff hlCJnbers from t.hc HUD Hegiona1 O .ff~ce have been very hc1pfu1 in meeting wit h t.he C:i1..~zcns • .Com- mittee and -wi.t J~ the Plnt~~~~~~g Department sta£f to prov~dc tccl1t~ica1 assi.st::1nce nnd guidnn.cc . Staf.f members o:C the :\tetra D~nver Fair J £ousi.ng Center hove a1so prov:idcd tech.njca.1 :information, pnrticu- 1ar1y rc1n tivc t.o ~he various housin:;: progr:-uns and options avni1nb1c to tltc City. A tour or Eng1cwood , for purpos es of orientation, was arranged by the P1 n nni.ng D c pnrt.Jncnt, and ·whi.. h has been tnkcn by ntost of the Comr.t :i. 1..tcc m em bers.. (::=:ce At..t.nchrncnt.. ____ ). X 4. D c_,;cribc thr-n a ture a.nrl r a n~e o f i s.!"=uc-s rel a ting to fh C! ~pplic ~hlc programs" ilh nh~ch participating f;rO~ps anU indi' idu:.l s h n 'c dea lt; the re-comme-nd a tions s ults cquc.-ntly made; and the s pcc•fic res ults and a.cco n- pli ,.,h m c-nts of chc p a .-ticip:ltion . Sec Page 20A -20- • • • • [ - - I t' I I ,_ 1- • • 0 t • - }~~GE _ _?O-~ Eal.·l~y con:.; ide en Lion \.'!'1.~; !.tadc :.>y t.hc Co"'lft i. L L ee Lha t t.•cpt:r--scn:Ln.t..ion or tJtl.noL·i..L y and 1o·.v-inc.o:.tc ~roups a nd rC">l"C!":>Cnlo.t.ion. £rOJt <-~Cl.:to..in aco:_; .. ·aphic o:\l."C:l.S :tn.d n.rc ns of concer n wo.~ w0~1k artd llC·~dod to be l.>u1slcrcd . T\JO persons were o.ppo:in L e U Crom Lhc Ih.1Gt:-tn. n.-.J a. lions Counc.i.1 nad 1.\vo pct.·sons '':lt-la ... ·ec '* .. .._·ere n.ppoin.Lcd to c:i.vc the bo Lt er rcprcscntat.i.on.. b . AJ 1 oL the ''r\rcas o .f Concern .. we re d..iscus nc d and /\rca ''A'' ·w as chose n t.o be the .i.nitin l. targc t area .. par ·ticu- 1 al.·1y because of prc1lmino.ry work · a 1rca dy don e ~1 1 tlt is area . Other rco.sons £or Lhc choice o£ thls area ha ve bee n pr c v:iou s ~y cnu.mc\.·atcd . c . P~ob1 eillS out s~dc of the Areas o£ Couc e ~n were eons~dcrc d . partlcu1ur1y tl~o amount at~d 1ocnt~on o£ subs tandard n1ts nnd tl1e ovcrn11 hou s ~•~g problem . It was dcc~de d tl"::! t n.rcns ou tsi.de of the J-\rca s o£ Concern should be nl:t=-roachcd through a systema tic, area by area .inspectio n a1'd c ode cnforc cme ~t prog ram . It uas d e c~dcd tl,at the Ci.t y should p1ncc hi g h priority on developing a housing prog rnm to de a 1 wi. t h the cri ti.c:tl. s hor t:a g c n. n.d t..ha t c1.·cnti on of a Housi ng J\ut.hori.ty should be accoT.1p 1i.s hcd at an e arl y date . d .. The need £o r i.n.Corr.tl.ng the pui.>1i.c o£ the Comm ittcc •s work at'd tl1c s~tb scquc nt ~I,!p1J.cnti.ons . It was a g reed t.h n t the Commit tee ·would be ncti.vc in sc 11i.nc-· the pt·o,3'ram in the commu nity :tnd in scc uri.no:: .iritp1cncn.tati.o n. o£ t.hc rccoJru.tcndn. tions . c . The v nr"'ious HUD p1.·o g:t·a ms w hich J'1i.ght be uti.1i.zcd b y the Ci.t.y we r e revicv:cd wi.l h :ruo Rc g iona1 OCCicc pcrso nn.c1 . It w::-.s decided Lh::tt ::t .·op Urb1.n R c n.c .. v::t.~ r . PPo~cct ~ou1d be tl,c mos t crrcc t~ve ::tt,d c~r1~cs t sLar ti.n ~ method f'or tt.·o~atin:.; .·\1.-c::t. ••A••. The clra.ft .of the Cily .!::t.ll:t f:C l.""s rcconu:lc n.dcd Cap.:ita 1 I t,tp \·ovcmcn t Pror:-raJ.t was reviewed . Com.r.t_i 1.. t ee SU3'(;"CS ted to Lhc Cl. ly ~ln.n:1ac 1.· Lh at Lhc propose d Comm uni. ty Bui.l.d i.ng shou 1d be oml t:t.cd because t.hc nee d f'ol.· such a raci.l._ity is qucsti.ortcd clue to the ::t.vn.11abi..1 _ily o.f co•nM.crcia l., church ;-.nd othc.1.· pub1i.c .Cn.ci J.i.Lics , and be- cause oC Lhe p~ans o£ Lhe Schoo1 D~str~ct to add A1 1- pu.l·posc Rooms ~t a11 c1cr.tc ntnry schoo]_s no t having such Fnc"'i1itl.cs at presen t . • II • • '32x [ • • • RESOLUTION NO. 38 SERIES OF 1971 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REPLACE~reNT O F INADEQUATE WATER LINES. WHEREAS, Sect~on 15-3-56(b) of the '69 E.M.C. pro- vides that the City Counci1 may construct a water main of sufficient size to serve an area that is current1y served by an inadequate 1ine~ when, in the opinion of the City Counci1, the present 1ine is causing an .undue hardship upon the users thereo£ or upon the City; and WHEREAS, the City Counci1 does hereby find and _d etermine that the 1ines as existing on January 1~ 1971 in the pub1ic streets 1isted be1o~ ~ere and arc in- adequate and do cause undue hardship thereby upon the users thereof. as we11 as upon the City . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO as fo11o~s: 1. That a11 service connections to the o1d 1ines in the fo11owing 1ocations, that have "not a1ready been c hanged over to adequate City mains shou1d be changed over as soon as practicab1e and at the cost of the property o wner. 2. That a11 changeovers accomp1ished in the ~oca tions set out be1ow be made in accordance with the schedu1es estab1ished by the City Counci1 in its Reso1ution dated June 16. 1956 and that the same be co11ected by the Department of Uti1ities of the City. (a) 900 ,1000 and 1100 B1ocl6 on East Amherst Avenue 2700 B1ock on South Emerson Street 2 700 B1ock on South O gden Street. 3100 B1ock on South Oe1aware S treet 3200 B1ock on South Humbo1dt S treet 3900 B1ock on South Logan Street. 4500 B1ock on South Acoma Street ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 4th day of October, A.D., 1971 . Mayor Attest: ex offic~o City C1erk -1 - • • r 32 x [ .......... • , ·~ • I, Stephen A . Lyon, ex offic1o City C1erk of the City of Eng1e~ood , Co1orado, do hereby certify that th e above and foregoing is a true , accurate and corop1ete copy o£ a reso1ution adopted by the City Counci1 of the City of Eng1cwood at its regu1ar meeting on the 4th day of October, A.D., 1971 . -2- '· ! ~ • •