The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1971-11-01 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet• 0 - • Cou.nci.1 Meet i..ng November 1~ 1971 • • • - • • • ROLL CALL Brown Dhori.t K.:rei.1.i..ng Lay Lentsch Senti. Scta-&b • • - I ..• .i i'1 couNc;;L .. _ Crry O F ENGL.~~ •:::, ...;: 1-tL_£ · oo. COL-Q. • • r 32 x - ROLL CALL "" !il "' ~ C> !:! "' ;;;; -Brown -Dhori.ty Krei.1i.ng La Lentsch Senti. Sch-ab (q___ • • • • • - ~ ---....--- crry c%F F I c-I A L .. E...,T COL· ~ CIT'£ OF Et GL:=.. uO • -"- C OLO • • '32x c - "" S! ~ ~ • • • • 0 - ROLL CALL "' "' i ;:;; B rown Dhor i.ty K r ei.1 i..ng La Lents ch Senti. S ChW'ab ~ ::<! /5>/ A -"' ~~ -.t7'c-->~ c:r_ a...~~___,, ..L-0-->-< "-~~~~ z:-e c ·~.. <Z->-~~·4-/ l!lo ~-&.../ ~-.....-~ ~~~~ _.;;_..~z:n dZ"~~ .__,~t-..-f r:;.__, -~~ -d---.-£ c..v....__:r-...-/ --4 ~ -~ ~ C' __,..._'-.,.;_ ?{' ~~ J ../-/-!.!< / /~ .::"7-~" -<'b ,...".,:.b-e-./. J'Z ·...c...t...l' .. ..,_../,-_...u. <...~e--~ ~~ 1-1 • a t:l;i.-, ~ ... ~./ '2f ~ ~r~~ - --r-~ c~4-kte.<-v--«-Lj'UO u_r_.d ~'--.A--~- • \ ! "f • T 32X • c • -• - ROLL CALL "" 5! "' ~ ~ 0 ~ !:1 B rown Dhori.t y ..- Krei.1 i.n La Lents c h Sent i. S c h w ab --- p~.,P h-'~ h1 e.-4, ~L~~ • .. c::rry C:cg :F".. r-_ ~ r-1 .L\ t_ -cu..._~I2N r --- • • r 32x - - • • • • • - ROLL CALL Ptl...._E oo. C OL..o. ~~~.!:~~ :::.::::.. -~-..e.--o<-c......,.._p _a_ 5?"~ 1~~-;~~~~~~~lBir!owni:!l!!~~~~~~~~~~~~ La Lents ch S enti.. -- S chwab -- • • • r 32x • -• - ROLL CALL "' 5! "' ~ ~ 0 !:1 "' ;:;; Brown Dhori.t -K..rei..1i..n ----La ---Lents ch -----Senti. S chW"ab • • • r ----.-----------------------.~.-------~~~--~.-~~~.~~ •• '32x - ,o -- ROLL CALL Brown Dhori.ty Krei ~i.n La Lentsch Senti.. Sctn.Fab --.. - --- r 32xl - .3. • • • ROLL CALL Brown Dhori.ty Krei...1i..~ La...:£_ Lentsch sen ti. Schwab • • - _j , . OF F I CI A L C~ COUNr-t,__ ---o':;'u. E NT r / .• 1 I I C:OUN._JL I •• _._. 1 ,G FI LE C~ OF Ei'JGLEWooo, COLO. • • • \ ! r 32xl - Ct ~ - - ROLL CALL Brown Dhori.t Krei.1i.I'\.Q Lay Lentsch Senti Schwab - -- c~ c~0 E.!,c 1 A L -,......OCUMENT -1 I 1 -- r 32x - - - - - ROLL CALL Brown Dhor.i.ty Kre.i.l.i..n La Lentsch Senti Schw-ab - - - 1.. • i -- r 32xiC • \ ! ;. --• - O Fr-"I C f.AL C'lJ:X COL'... ' .----. -· .... ENT ROLL CALL cour.....c,_ L~ ~OF E Q!.....L-. ... -00. C OLO • Brown ..- Dhori.ty ---Krei.1i.._n -La ..-- Lentsch -Senti -Schwab - A-t-~=~.,_~ F ~L-2.._~~- c,_;;-~ - --• - -• I' 32X - • • • -- ROLL CALL Bra><n Dhority Krei1i.n La Lentsch Senti. Schwab • 0 - I I co u~ , ~c CITY OF E:r-.. "Lt~,-QD . CPLQ r~·~ .. ~~ ... ~ a.-..-c-~ ~~~ -<[-___ eo.-...J ~-~ ~-.;U_.__/. ~ ~ d.,..,_e-1 J\..2.D./o ~~--4 -- c.AL_......, d.--su.-.,.. £-V ~ :;£, • • r 32xl - ROLL CALL "" S! l:Z 0 !:i :;! Brown Dhori.t K:rei...1.i.n La Lentsch Senti Schwab • • • • • - ~ ~ "' ;;: O FF IC IAL COU •r:r,_ r-....,_U M E N T .i. •• cr:;,o u r-..;crL --...:; Fi LE OF ENGL EV..tOOO. COLO. . , \ ! ~ • • I' 32 X • • - O FFICIAL CI'T'Y: C O U !"•-•f. ~ ~-u NT ROLL CALL c ou: c__- CITY O F ENGL E ~. '•L o . c ot_o. "' !2 "' ~ 0 ,., ~ !:i ::c t • Bra-n -Dhori..t'V K.re.i..1.i..riQ La Lentsch Senti.. S chwab --::::: • • • • r 32x • • • R O LL CALL Brown Dhori.t Krei.1i..~_g_ Lay Lentsch Se.n.ti.. Sch-ab / • • -.. c rry c:~{; ~~ CIA C ·'L rocuME"N"11 I i • • I' .32 X ROLL CALL i !2 0 "' !:1 '"" ::c Brown Dhority Kre.i..1.:i....n --La Le.ntsch Senti. Schwab • • • • - "' i - -- .. COU N-t_ CrrY OF L N kt. rJLE:- QD, C OLO. \ ! 'T • • /'32X - - • • • ROLL CALL Brown Dhori...ty Krei 1 i...n La Lentsch Senti. SchW'ab -- • • - lA• 1 ~-..L"'<~ /<2-~~~-... z.£._.,_\ ..z__-£',.. .-y_._;;,..C_ --"""t....r ,.Pc::z.-..~ ~ C"-<-c~.:J a!..._ ~ •, ~..._... fo /.,..-,_' • ,- • • ,32X - • • • ROLL CALL GL-c.~ Bro"Wn Dhority Krei.l.i..ng La Lentsch Senti. Schw ab • • - ~ I I co u:-...:ci _ . ... .• FI L.E CITY OF Ef.CLE'-'-'000. C'O L 0 4 c~ ~---7 .::../'_. ·"-·~ ~· ..-£~/~ ~--<--~~~ />--t.n.-' />-z.? -'"''-"2 ~vy /-<>--> /'--'>~""---"- • \ ! '!" • • T 32X - - "" S! ~ C> !:i - - - • - ROLL CALL "' ~ ..., ;:c Brown ---Dhor.i.t . 1 K.rei...J..i..:i=la La ---COU N -;~-• ' .U FI L..E Lentsch CITY OF ENGLE'\. C OD. C O LO.. Senti. ....-- S chwab ~ ~,.~.....,~ c..""~ a: ... L"Z:i;:., _ __, a. ~~ ~ ..=-.-..L -....~ ', I ~ -• r 32x - • • ROLL C ALL Brown Dh.or.:i..ty Krei.1i.!!9_ La Lentsch Senti. Schw-ab • 0 - -.1. • I co u :--.~...... ..... _ . ~ , u. C~ OF ENGLE'v 0 00. COL..O. • • [ r I ~ - • • • .. - ... ROLL CALL ~ Sl l3 "' 0 ~ !:l ;:;: Brown Dhori.t Krei.l..:i...n co La Lentsch C \TY OF:_ Senti Schwab .Q.,_ z~----y ~~~----:?-~~--~" <:£.-2 /c?~"-<--1[_,"-"-l{;- ,-LE. .. c...cw. c ot-o . , • • ~· \ ! • or I' 32X [ • • • ROLL CALL Brown Dhori..ty Krei.l...:Lng La Lentsch Senti.. Schwab • • - - O FF I ClAL c:rT""'" c::c> .• -• ~l..!""''E"NT" C::.OU '".,-· -FI LE CIT"'t: O F ENC.LL •• COD. COLO.. • • r 32x - • • • ROLL CALL Bro'Wrl Dhori.t Krei.1i.n La Le.ntsch Senti Schw.a.l=> • 0 -,. .!.. • ' COUNC...,L ;. f c i L.E ClTY O F ENGLE,_·.,;oOD. COLO. ~~~·~~~~ ..... ,' ~'--;J--L -r~~-' -~~~__r ~/ --L..~ _ __L~J~ i7'-:'-:?---~"--'-..___ _______ • \ ! "!" • T 32X • [ • • • --:> /- ~ ':2 - 3 <' R O LL CALL S! 0 fjJ B r<»a> Dho:r.i.ty K r e.i.1i.n Lay Lents ch S ent.:i... S c:::h<wab • 0 .. - ~ ~ ~ J.. { I . .,,,& p? t 1ill • • • r 32x • • 0 - ~ a-...p-~~e---~.,-,.v -:?' c-4-~ ~ ~~----r:: a~~bt-~,--q;, &~ ar~ ~-"'/ --"-~ ------v~ ---'~ C-< <!/-<:>:> c>::>-~£'7..?'-z-"'.,.-,-~ --...-_......._ -----s;------c:z/ ~~~-- ~a-~.~~&--~ __...<'<>c~~-v-_..,._. --C'C?L"e:--~ ~-<'..,.,;:;"'?" ~ ~«"~-"'- ~4 _....c,-do--c/Z<Z~4i'~_..e/ _..,.-/-'.rZ£'./ ~r.--z--=-:-~ z<"-4 ~<-". ~~~::y Af'l;-;._~;:,>-C>-z:-.,-~ -:tr __z:4 ~~-----' ~z;z;..~ c-..V~~_,.-L , --~~-=-q-_, ~.e"~~c::.? ~~ ~--5-- ~ ~---~ ~~ -/J?--'" ~ /?:J?.o-y_..---' c2~-.a/ ~ ....-:e~A~ <0/~ ~ ~~pr ~ ...--::?~_,-;: ~ fie/~A--?_p LL-z:::->-r ~.,£/,..<,.;><: ~.e"4"";H, _.a/~?~#, ~.!!Lk_? / ~~-a&~-~=-A:. ~.&~ c2 /----=.-'=/.. c;,->z:-"_,_.c-~.,.-~~ ~~ ~ ....-"'7-~y.....,. ~.c-~..-.c-~ 4i' ~~L~ /_.e ~.--.e.u~~ ~~ __.-C."'<".c//~-.&f'k~ /~~~-e-~ .&:::>~~cr4{~--· /~---~~~ o-z:-.,..~~c-~A--~.?<.--~?" ~...fi;;;~-r&:;: ~""~~ .c:::::£~- CZ-4 .. ~ ~-rd ~<-...-~~ /.:'~/ ~......,... ... ~ &....-£-::>~~<'~??c~-~~r-7"-? ~~---~ ~-L~'-'~<"~...,....,.,~~ ...&?k-.,.::;f" -e.?..,.-~~ _r_/~ 7~ ~..c_::;o:u-.,.4 -97 r-4 ~~.::Ak-.-, ~~.c?~Y'" ~ ~-L/ /.J:; /r// ~ ~~~~ CZ-?' .---?e;.c~cY". 7~-"" ~ ~---~~ .--/'4 ~/7z---:;::' 7~ -..-'z~ v~.cc~e'~~~~~ c::?../___# .c::rY".,---"' c;;:/~"'·~ &7 ~7_._ -?Z--•ce~/ ~ , .z-.-9/ ~c-/1?~e/ ~--~ ./.74/,b . ~_.<?....£~ ~~-Z«"L'.Y~ ~~,... c::erL e.c2'~ -A-4~ ~<~~ ~ ~~--'<:42-L:.---~ ~ ~~-~4?~~-~ ~,a.-.../c,/~ ....<~ _r£r---~,? ~// ~~ -;r-~ -<-;;....~~~ .4:'~ ~~~c.:V c?~Y 7~ ~7 ~ 4-~ c:2 __J.;.LL~-<r~--~ ~ ~ .. .,..~-r-e...--~ .........,.~.....,.._.,........ ~ ~~ ~~~.,./~.,;<-~ _..,...e2~.ar p • ,.. r • • • • 0 - ~-?" £~~--:>~ ~~-""~-~="='-?;-~ ~ : ___ d --~~ ~~L-~~-u:.-_ c::::?--2ek7 /#---c4.?_,.~ __,~---.,::::=/_..--~~~ ,-?~~ ~7-k..hz<?~~c/ ~.-'__..-/~ ~~GZ~~, ~ z / ;?.-;/ ~....--' .c::2.r-?--":V~ ~-~~-C2__;:Y ~~ ..../~<-~...-?7<'~~___...,;:::-=.(· .,...-a..,• ~~<G<---T-~ ~~~= .r{" a r .z ~C2-// ~<'~..-:!.-c-~,9-<' ~ ~ ~-£.-tt:..:z.. _ CJ~,?:~-= ~ ~~4 ~-~ ~~--------- ~y ~-C~~~ ~.......-"--~ ~~--------......,..~:?"'~ .... ~-// ~ ~ ~ "3 ' ~c~/ ~-=!.C-::1~< ~;, .... ~ ~ cz.c-~~er' C-2 -...."/ C? ~.....--~~ ~~-<>-<-'"--;? ~ -~ ~ ~c -.?~ /9-?/_ ?~,.,, ~ c-.,•----"'../ y :r~ ...--:::7/7:'/, .r....C ~ ~~~ C-f-d~~,~- .,;-<2/ c:z-,/' e..c> ~d ~c:>-..y-/? ~-e-~~-«-cY"" ~ ~~ ---~- ~<"'-_.A!'5:;;4r ~?-?-~ ~c?~-<-2y>&.V r;r~ ~/~-$do£_ ~ ~....c-~er' ~ ---='/&'&> -c4-~~?"'-~~--z ~ -~~...-r::?~,;-~--c<...-/--6 ......u~cz-__.....,~--<k6-"a!./ ~ -Z-4 y .:,. ~-;,~~ ...... 6-.-r ~~~~..a__:?~ ~~c:e ~<-=-~-<~~~----< ~y ~~ ~<~~:..t?~~ ,_;:;61~~;?.;.e./!... --o:Ze....C'~e~~ ~_,/-~ ..A'e~.-.e-sz./ ~?? .---2~~--e<-/ ~ rL 3 _.,_ ~~..,_,~~ ~a..-e/-~~~ ______g:.c.-~~~ _..d;?. ~~~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .-----?~-~ ~ -z..;?~ ~~- ~_.,.; «7_.Y'""--b --:::?d ~ay--~ ~~.4~ ~ ~"""'~ ~~ ~~_,~...,..~::~-~y ~~~ ~~~~~ ... --- ~~/~~ ~~~~ ~.;/ ~~~~~~ z:z;;~~zr~ ~~,::7 'J7-~.?k":' ff ~~Ci.,., y£1/v .Af2,2<!!"'.&-.t?--='=' ~ _z::L~~-.c.. ~a-Y -.x /:P ... xe/~-.t>~-"' e-'~.-=:'..r ~~c:Z~ _/~::~<.? . ,. . ---------- • • • • 0 -- ?~_,..-r~ ___.--t"7~e--..,;..p--___..:i!!"~ ----=?..-?/~ z---4 -r~ -z£-...h(L~~_zy/ ~ ~C"'~"""'.,... ~y-C?.y-e -'> ~-~czr.-:? ~~-<>,_..,.._,., ~~.cr.?'~--~~-s;r ~..,__., ~-?? =- ~? ~ <""/"=--·=&"""'""' c.::-e"~~ ~.-r1' r<? .a:;_,; ~/7."'/~~ -"'~LZL/.?~ ~ ~?;?~~~ ~-4---:>.-<"~,q~ ~~ ~e~ d7"-____..--.£ ~=~~ ~~ ~-'~~ ... ~£- /£if~6 ~~"""~ --?. c :7 z ~-... ~~~/ ~,-y _.-_,>r- ~ -~_...........~_ ~ ~/--£~ ~ z-...4-' ----<"~~~------::Z-#2~ ~~~ ~- ~~~--"' ~ &z-<'~~--<'~-C'-;:2--=<7' c? ~-:f? ~~/ ~ a /4_,..... r ~~/~~ ~ ,;:> .i:> ""<.!!/ ~c~£-<'"_z;;;-~~ 4--Yz~ ~~~ .::2~-' ~~~-~~~~-~~ ~ p~__,~/F--""/ &-"""'--:<!!-"' ,----z.z~...b--'--4~ ~ z::4 .---2-.z~~ . , .• ------------ 0 • • • • 0 - ~/~~/«~ qr ~ ~~L.-7<'--:;' ~-/~--~ c-___..-""""" ....... ~ ~<:?""~ ~ o-e7.5_...-/9.--/ .4-..--.---u--~ ... ~-..-_:;.~__..-~ ~ ..c4'/-/".,.--<'~ ~c-~.,-~ :;r-~ -.&---~ ~ ~----z-::;,. ~ &!?c./ /.{-.-/.9--.--' .c'..C..c::---../ ----~~_.;~ ~--"' ~ ~~ ~,:'~~-;:::9~ a--6-d;P .r-~~ ~--~.-=-z~_,. f a;:?'~~_.J /-?_.? __ ../ 4/-e--~ _ ___.,~_,...,--<.,.~~ ~ ~ ..:.~~~_...~~- L2>r.c-~-c"~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ -~ ~ ~""-~~~ ~~ ;;r-c;: ~r c-:::;;-.-..,_.._._..,.~ ~--~~_p-L ~~-c.,-/ ~~4£~.-p ~;>"'?'"' &~,.~ _;:;p-..?~...? _4 zz.' ~Z?:L'<'"'~~ ~~~~-~~ /~ ~~.cz.# ~~~-&~~ ~c.-7-tf ... ..c~ ~~ ~ ~....-r/----~___,..,-4" -4'~4 ~ ~ ~,-d'e-~...d-~ ~--~~.-""" ,c;?.C ,..--~ =--------~ ~~--~~~--~ ~ ~~ .....-C'.-?-.<"""....r~---~ Or-c-~c-~~---~R.e~ ~~ ~..,..----~ ... ~ ~ar ~ .... ~~_., 7~ c.;,£ ~.-?~~..--:2~/~_.,.~ ~~ _:z:::z ~ --.z:; :r _-&__,-.....L~? ~&'~ ~;Ji?d-<?~ ~ ~~-r /~~_,?:?..:-:?~~ ~ ~~::,~..e;Y' ~~n z:::;;,::::: ~ ~ Z:Z:::: .----2~-cz::::' ~ ....-----2~~ ~ ~/~ .c:Z.?/../ .c<~ n -~ ' n ~ ~d..y/-7 ~...c'"'~-4'<"~ zZ ~ ........ ~ ~..-..62'4'--::7~ ~~~.67>"'f" ~r-~~~ ~,.~..,.;;~~- ~p.,;..,.L~ _ _...::_e cd"~~___,-_.?""-~ ~ ~~~ .:;-L.. ~ L?~ _,d:' c?~.<.~~ --7/f ~,9'7 .... C2' ~ ~ ~ ~ /.Z~~ ~&U? ~ ~~~~~ g:P ~~ e.£,~:z~...: ~ r 6!2~ ~.?~r-~ ~ ...... -~~ -c..~./~ ~ _.......-x...e.q ~ ~ ....--2.2~--~ jEt •••• ------------- I' • • • • 0 - ~~~~<4 -0.?_.:;; .cz.y=.- ~~ ~:;Y?P ~2!".!'-='C"c~~ d-=-~ ~~ --/--d.-'"<'~__,-~ .3'".3: ~~-~ /? _.-.;.--' ~ _,?Ca-<:.c.?...-~~-----~---~ ---<'e..,z~..-9 /~ r .,.C ~-=~ _r .r~ ~~? ~ ~~~ --z~.:::;,.-. E-' .,.-""" ~.,....__ - c::? ~a"~,-' -~ ~_.,.~~ ~~~~ /.4 ~~cO• :..__....-<>~~--:!.;,-~------ ~..-,-.-~,-/=-cL';><_ ~Y 7:::>7~_.,..~ ~""""_,..-;,.~~-~____:;;7'~ ~-C.,-'7 _,e>.,/~ ~ ~ >tK P'o _.& r7 <' e • ,~ ~-"1-i ~; 1fT/97/ ~ ca.~~""' ~-::!,e-o/e-0<' ~?"~h=»r--hy ,.--..2;:1:7-z--4""'. ~ ... ?~~-~~/ ~ ~ ~ a :F a~---?'~ CU-L.zX..-,.~ ~ C?L?f<._., C? ......... ~~~~~ ~ -~~-~~~..--!~-'~ ~~----- o.../ c:;.t(,. --k--L~~ ~""---~~---~ ~~~ ~ ...... ~ ace/~-~-~ -9-/7 -~--- ?~ z-~ ....-c-'r¥~ ;;:?' _..::?-,.4 ......-:;'~ ~ ~~ ___....-2 ""--'~ ct....-~/~<./ c?// .--zy..,-~. ~ .....-~4"_.9'~""7 c:&e-/~.,eP7 r-4 ~~~ C?.a~~~4"'- ~,-?:?-c.-Z:X"<::.>:..---~"'~./~~---a:' ~ .... ---=-~..,..~-- ___;;?~ c.,.,?..,~~ cz/~ ~ e .;y c~~.:~ .#.<;s~ .,.-~ --4 z:2C &:~,L~ cz£a?7'~-·~ ~?.?~...-:-...q_ _,4-o ~~~ -C',.._ ~ c:2fr':J-?Z£?,z/ 6/~~.<Z/ c--d ~....#::"~---4-~~ . ~~ z::.:G. ~.C../f~.......--2~ .c;,4 ?~~-a ... .e:z:_.- CZ-<:7 ~~~ c2e/ ~c:..-- "7-4 ~CU./~~~~~~~~~- • . ,. . ~ --------- . - • • • 0 0 - ~-?.::""-a.:~c?,..~ ~/~.;~ ~~..-?;:""~ ~ .... ~...,.,. .... ~ ...... ..,.,.~~ ~._,_;:r --..e:?e<./".--.~.-?" ~-'.r-r""~ ~""~% ~ ~£~#.:'""""../~ _-/.£-:r~--'2~ C6 _k ~~~~.,.~~ ___.;;£- ;r:zc;>~"':r r~ /9?/ cu ~.c.?~ c::2a~~ ~ ' .....?~ay-c-;;> -v C:..~ c6~ .-4 ~ ~ C<i"~f£?.,;;"'~~ ~t' ~ ~L.P57' Z::Z::.--"~_.q; ~ --?~ _..-"}~~ .Q...d ~~~...<-&/-C-l.~ c:L:y~~ :_~;£:! ~~-r c;~.e2/'~ ~ ..... ~-"""'~ ~~~ c.3:/ c:k<--??..c'~ _.;2~-f--k'~ c:? ../{> ~ ~=:;<-'.;h¥ ~ ~~--:P~ .6/~ ....-----....?y.a--<2 -ed-;!7 _.d ~~.er' ~~"'"""""? -d~~~-'4? .....---:::'d'~~cz/ ~4:'..4-cr.?~r . ..::::.T ~~""'-' ~---~-e.?...,.-~ ~ ~..-c-c.../ ~ ~· -p z;d', ~.......-? -A-=<'-<>«.2.<! ...<:'v~=/ ~~_7"2<::7~ ~ ~~ ~---C'<,·& $<!'3 ~~ .-:::"?'""~~ ~.,.~~~~~ ~~-~L ~-c-~~,..~4"' ~/"'-..dk~~~ ~-y .:::-:::./."'~ ~ ~../~ ~ cZ~~~~ ~ c?~~~ C7 ..---r-~4 ?r'.;>.<~ ~ ~~/"".:'~--'""'"?' ------'2~-.......,-~~ _;__...~ ~~ ~~-_.;,~ ...... ~ ~~ ?-....... ~ ~?_..>./_ C::~J --7~-<'-=---~/~.-?~---:?~~ ~ ~~ ......-?.r :-tcc'/C~ r2-,J. ~d=--......-. c2 L ./ C2yt'"'-' ~~ ~.a--;--.::~ c:0.c~~ z;;:c; ~~ ~~~~ a.r ~??7-c"C ,.,<? ......--..--<:!' c?.t:' ;._.,..~ 4? ~--""" ~~ cr' ~ ~;c/ ~<4?<CZ-"'<7h~;;?-z:£' .:07~~~ ~ LZ~ ~~/~";9 ~........-.. .?"a:""' ~-~~<?""_..?'~ __...T~..t.<' .--..----~£---~~..,.,. --~~-:::¥-C'-=-~~-"~ ~ j'c....&: --c:h~<-&>4;p ~ ~/-/-~ -.z-7~ _.7_£-.""'__r-~2 ~ __,_~~~.a~-.4-~ ~ c.L.;r-"Z'?.t:'~?~ ~ ?~ A"~----~_.) ----~~-----.9..7/ ~.,.._...,.,...4'"""'-""""' ~e...?~ . • • !·• ) ' ---------- 0 \ ! I' • • • • 0 - c:;;~ ~-.?-=:-.a-~/ ~a~ ~_4~ ~~ ~ ~c~ ~ ~:-~-;:--~ c /" c? ~~~ ~----...---;7 C""~~~~ __.-57 ~-<?~_£'!. ___ -.:-.,-~...,..."".ky r -d'.a..Y ~o-q~-.-7 ~ -2'./~~~4-~/ ~ ___r4 ~/~·.,-4 r~~~~ ,dd-.....,~...;..,~ ~.....,.,..--?."'· / Qw~~~~~---=~4'.-y L~~ =---~~~ ~~ ~~--e::64"'_:5G/ ~ -u ~~ ~ C7 ..7 --Z.. ~~;?.?.?./.?a-&~ ~~4'~-::J..:::Z:~ ~~~~<..? ~ .......--2;?--';n'd}?~~ ~ ~ ~~- "7..c-~~ ~ ---c-'?Z-:-:1~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ _____.-;?~~ ~ ~ c:::z "'-' ./ c:l:-;/ ec> ~ ~A? ~zcc:P' 24:5' ~ ~~~ ~ .... ~<"';~-----~~:?.i~ ~ft':i'--t:"~ ~ ..... -=~~~~#~ ~;p ~_,?~_., .... ..,.....~----" 7"~_...,.. ~~~~-~ ~ c.7 3 2 .p .:.-??2~~z-__., ~/ _&.:;ok"-&?r~ ~----""<' ~ _;?:"..c-;~.z.-,./ ~~e ""/ ~ ~;?..?__., ~~~~ --r~....r-??? /d.L-.6' c:?>..:y' ~ _/~~..--../ _,c..,o ->12 -".t-<'--~ ~ ,r,:::' /.:-~~ ~ .9~ 4'./ ~~:;:"'~J --z-y~ z-~ ~../ ~ ~ .-.;?~ ~ ~ . .A'a ~4""__.:d__.- C2~L~· ~-~e.-.7 ~ ~y&-=~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~-=~~ --4 ~~---~ ~-.;.~~ ~<'~? ~-<:"~~----~~ ~ ~~~ ---4 c:&-#='~--~~ ~CZ'~~ . ·-· --------- 0 0 r • • - - AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCIL SESSION NOVEMBER 1 , 1971 )'\.. C OU t.,:._ ;::-r 0 C:~ O F Ei,.·CL.t_.,, 8 :00 P. ~1. Call to order, invocation by th e Rev. Barry Kimbrough of th e Englewood Methodist Church, pledge of a11egiance led by Boy Sco ut Troo~ 1 ~.( and roll call . 1 . Minutes. _...-(a) R e gular meeting of Oc·tober 1 8 , 1971. (Copi es trans- mitted herewith.) 2 . Pre-schedul ed citizens and visitors . (a) Recognition of .. special guest s•• of the Council • .........-(b) Messrs. Frank Clapp, 2 191 Ridge Road, and Gerald Clapp, 2608 South Patton Court., wiU be present to discuss the City's a nlmal incine rator. (c) Mr. J\.1.cMartin a nd Mr. Woodrow Good vvill be present to request a 3 . 2 .fermented malt b everage license for th e ~11 Southland Corporation at 4400 South Broadway. e.~ Mr. K e n Hammond vv-111 b e present to request renewal of the 3 . 2 fermented malt beverage license for the Del Farm Store. 4160 South Broadway. 3 . Public hearing to consider the issuance of a 3 . 2 fermented malt beverag e license to the ~aning Tower of Pizza. 90 W est Belleview Ave nue. 4 . Communications. (a) (b) (C) (d ) (e) List o.r s treets proposed for inclusion in Paving District No .. 21 .. (Copies transYDitted here"Wtth .. ) Minutes of tbe Workable Program Citizens CoYnmittee meeting of <>ctober 14. 1971. (Copies transYDitted herewith .) Minutes of th e Planning and Zoning Com.mission meeting of October s. 1971 . (Copies transmitted herewith.) Minutes of the Election Commission :r:neet::ln g of October 1 8 . 1971. (Copies transmitted herewith.) Minutes of th e Water and Se'Wer Board :r:neetLng of October 19. 1971. (Copies tran sYDitted herewith.) (1) Memorandum recom...mendJng the approval of Supplement No. 32 to Connector's Agree-V""' rnen t ...,-lth Southgate Sanitation District. (2) ~~~;~~t~:~c;~~Uei~~:gU:':!~~e~~~ ~ the progran1 to convert all City fiat rate water accounts to :metered accounts vvtthin a period o:f approxim_ately two years; to sell bonds as necessary to finance the COI'llverslon and to proceed vvith the .'W'ork using in-bouse personnel rein.f'orced as necessary by additional hiring for the duration of this pro- ject. (3) MeYDorandu..J:n u.rgt_ng the Clt:y to sign a Quit ~,/"" Claim Deed 'W'b..lch 'W'O\lld per:r:n_tt the acqu.isitlon oL land necessary to realign and then cross portion o£ t:h.e City .Dttcb right-of-w-ay .. (Continued) I I LE PD. COLO . 0 r • • - - AGENDA F OR REGU LAR COUNCIL SESSION NOVEMBER 1. 1971 Pa.ge2 5. City Attorney .. ....-ra,) Ordinance on final reading establishing the City property tax and mill levy for 1972. (Copies prev ·io~ ~a~itted. .. ) (b ) Request for permlasion to attend a short course on •• Local Governn:l.ent Problems•• at the South"West Foundation a:t Da11a.a. Texas. I>ecember 6 -9. 1971. (c ) Attorney' a choice .. 6. City Manager .. ~a ) Consideration of" the Ch&.D1ber of Con:unerce request !or participation. In the annual Chrlsb:na.a decorations prograzn ... (b ) Consideration. of a contract !or the perlormance o£ th e 1971 City audit-(Copies previously transmitted.) (c ) Memorandu.xn from the City Manager to the Council regardi_ng proposed liq·uor license ren~al procedure ... (Copies transmitted he~tb ... ) (d) Request for permission for Deputy Chle.! Dona.ld J ... Mc:Lellan to attend a conference on emergency rescue c .a.re in I.4l.a Vegas. Nevada.. November 7 -11. 1971. (e ) Me:morandu:r:n fro'!D. the City Manager regarding the adoption of certain BuUdlng Codes. (Copies trans- mitted here~th--) • (f) ~~er'~ choice ... 7.. Recognition of non-scheduled citizens and visitors ... 8.. General discussion. (a~ Mayor's choice .... (b) ~ouncUman'a choice ... 9.. Adjoununent .. ~#J>~ STANLEY H. DIAL City Manager SHD/lj • • • T 32X • • • • AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCIL SESSION NOVEMBER 1. 1971. Page2 5. City Attorney. -{a) Ordinance on f1nal reading esta.bllshtng the City property tax and n:1Ul levy for 1972.. (Copies previa~ ~a~itted.) (b) Request for permission to attend a short course on ·• Local Governxnent Problems" at the South:W'est Foundation at Da.l1as. Texas. December 6 -s. 1971 .. (c) Attorney's choice .. 6.. City M.anager. ~a) Consideration o.f the Chamber of Conu:nerce request for partlctpatlon in the annual Christmas decorations program_ .. (b) Consideration o£ a contract for tbe perlorm_ance o£ the 1971 Ci~ audit.. (Copies previously transmitted .. ) (c) Mexnorandu:rn from the City Manager to the Council regarding proposed liquor license renewal procedure .. (Copies transmitted hereW"lth .. ) (d) Request .for permission :for Deputy Chief Donald J .. McLellan to attend a conference on emergency rescue c .are in Las Vegas. Nevada. November 7 -'11. 1971 .. (e) Memorandum fron1 the City Ma.na.ger regarding the adoption of certain Building Cod.es. (Copies trans- mitted here'W'it:h. ) (f) Man_a.ger'~ ch_oice. 7. Recognition of non-scheduled citizens and visitors. B . General discussion .. (a!_ Mayor's choice. (b) r.ouncUtnan 's choice. 9. Adjourn:m.ent. STANLEY H. DIAL City Manager SHD/ij • • • \ ! ;. • • • COUNCIL C HAM.BERS CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO OCTOBER 18 , 1971 REGULAR MEETING: The City Council of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe County , Colorado, met Ln regular session on October 18, 1971, at 8:00 P.M. Mayor Schwab, presiding , called the mee ing to order. The 1nvocatLon was given by the Reverend Allen Strong of the United Presbyterian Church. Pledge of A~1egiance w as led by Mayor Schwab. The Mayor asked for roll call. Upon the call of the ro11, the following were present: Counc1l~en Senti , Lentsch , Lay, Kreiling, Dhority, Brown, Schwab. Absent: None The M ayor declared a quorum present. Also present were: Assistant C1ty Manager McDivitt C1ty Attorney Berardini Deputy C1ty Clerk Herndon COUNCILMAN LENTSCH MOVE.D, COUNC I..LMAN BROWN SECONDED, THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGUI.AR. MEETING OF CX::TOBER 4 ~ 1. 971 , BE APPROVED AS READ. Upon the ca 11. of the ro11, the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: Schwab. Ayes: Counci1men Senti, Lentsch~ Lay, Kreil.ing~ Dhority, Brown, Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor decl.ared the m o tLOn carried. Mr. George "Pete•• Peterson, Execut i ve Director of the Eng1ewood Chamber of Commerce , appeared before Council. to request the City •s partici - pat~on Ln the annual. downtown Christmas dec orating program. Mr. B~11 De1ine a1so appea r e d before Council. to discuss the increase in costs for the Christmas 1ighting program. Mayor Schwab stated that the request wou1d be oons~dered at a Council. study session. M essrs . Stan Sear1e and Paul. Maxwe11 appeared before C~ty Council. to present a copy of Communications magaz~e to City Counc~1 . Mr. John Icabone~ DLrector of the Eng1ewood Junior Pol.ice Band~ came before City Council. to request financial. assistance from the City. Mr. Ica..bone was informed that the request wou1d be ta.ken under advisement and woul.d be considered at a C ouncil. study session. Mr. Neil. Grigg of Se11ards and Grigg , Inc ., a ppeared before Council. to diacu•• the •tatua o~ the City•• atorm dra1naqe program. Mr. Grigg pre- aented •1idea •bowing the area• under eon•ideration an~ the prob1em• Lnvo1ved. • • I' • 2 - D1scuss~on ensued. Mayor Schwab stated that the matter wou 1 d be discus sed a t a study ses&Lon. The f~nanc~a1 report for the month of S e ptember , 1971, was receiv e d f or the record. A m e morandum from Mr . Stephen A . Lyon , D i rector o f FLnance, regarding t h e o-nershLp status of John w•s 1Lquor outlet w as received for the record . Two mernctra.nda , one from M r . James L. SupJ....nger, P1a.n.ni...ng D:Lrector, and the othe r from Mr. Ke11s Waggoner, DLrector of Public Works , regarding the 1972 State Highway Department requests , were received f o r the record . A memorandum from Mr. Stanley H. O~a1 , City Manager , dated October 1 4, 1971 , regardLng the appointment of a Task F o rce to study the possLbi1ity o f bicycle 1ane s was received for the record. A memorandum fro m Mr . Wi11iam A . HamL1to n , Fire C h ief ~ regarding his atte.ndance at the 98th Annua1 Internatio na1 Asso ciation o f F ire Chiefs Con fe r- ence in St. Louis ~ M isso uri , September 19 -23, 1971 , was received f or t h e reco rd . A memorandum fro m Mr . Stan1ey H . Dia1 , City Manager , r egarding his attendance at a Setni.nar o n ''Unde r standing C o mrnun..1..ty and Socia1 Change '' i.n Topeka, Kansas , on September 26 -Octo ber 1 , 1971 , was received f o r the reco rd . The minutes o f the Wo rkab1e Pro gram C itiz ens Committee meeting o f Sep tember 23 , 1971 , were received f o r the record . The minutes o f the P l.ann i n g and Zon ing Comm.1..ssio n m eeting o f S e p tember 21 , 1971 , we r e received for the reco rd . The minuees o f the Parks and Recreatio n C o mmissio n meetLng o f Octo ber 13, 1971, with a memo randum recommending that the City CouncL1 rec ons~der the Capital. Impro vements pro jects as set f o rth in the Parks and Recreat~on seven -year Cap.1..ta1 Lmpro vements Program , w ere received f o r the record. COUNCILMAN LAY MOVE D, COUNCI LMAN BROWN SECONDED , T HAT COUNCIL ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE P ARKS AND RECREATION C OMMISS ION THAT C:I:TY COUNCIL RECONS I D ER T HE CAPIT AL I.M.PROVE.MENTS PROJECT S AS SET F O RT H IN T HE PJ'l J<'"S :'\!\."'> REr::0 E ATION S EVE N -~EAR CAPITAL IMPROVEME ~S P ROGRAM . Upc:>n the .a 1 or -hr -o11 , t he voc:.e resu1ted as fo11ows: Aye•: Cou n ciLmen S enti, Lentsch, Lay, Kreil.Lng, Dhority, Brown, S ch"Wa.b. Nay•: N o n e Ab•ent: None The M ayo r dec1ared the motio n carr~ed. • • • 3 - The mi.nutea of the Publ.i.c Li...brary Board meet.i..ng of October 12, 1971~ wer~ rece~ved for the record. BY At..rrHORJ:TY OROLNANCE NO. 30, SERIES OF 1971 AN ORDINANCE AMENDI'NG TITLE 1X (LICENSES AND PERMITS) OF THE 0 69 E .M.C . ~ BY ADDrNG A NEW CHAPTE R THERETO, ENTrrLED CHAPTER B ~ ''POLICE AND FIRE A..I...A..RM SYSTEMS''; ESTABLiSHING STANDARDS AND CONTROLS FOR POLICE AND FIRE ALARM DEVICES , PROHIBITING THE CONNECTION OF SAID DEVICES TO PUBLIC PR.IMA.RY' T E LEPI-KlNE TRUNK LXNES, AND REQUIRING THE LICENSING T HEREFOR. (Cop i.ed ~n ful.1 Ln the off i.ci.al. Ord~nance Book.) COUNCILMAN KREILING M:)VE.D , COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED , THAT OBD:I:NA.NCE NO . 30, SERIES OF 1971, BE ~SED ON FINAL READING AND PUBLISHED BY TITLE IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD SENTINEL . Upon the ca11 o f the ro1l., the vote resu1ted as fol..l.ows: Ayes: C ounci.1men Senti., Lentsch , Lay , Kreil.i..ng , Dhor i.ty, Brown ~ Schwa.}:)_ Nays: N o ne Absent: None The Mayor decl.ared the motion carried. BY AUTHORITY O RD~E NO. 31 , SERIES OF 1971 AN O RDINANCE V7\C..ATING THAT CERTAIN ALLEY LOCATED IN BLOCK 79 , SHERIDAN HEIGHTS, CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COUNTY OF ARAPAHOE, COLORADO . (Co pied i.n ful.l. i.n the o ffi.ci..al. Ordi..na.nce Book.) COUNCI.LM.AN DHORITY M:)VED, COUNCJ:LHAN LENTSCH SECONDED, THAT ORDI- NANCE NO . 31., SERIES OF 1.971., BE PASSED O'N FINAL READING AND PUBLISHED BY TITLE J:N THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD S E NTI NEL. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resul.t.ed as f o l.l.ows: Ayes: C o uncil.men Senti, Lentsch, Lay, Krei.l.i.ng, Dhor i.ty, Brown, S chwab . Nays: None Absent: N o ne The M ayo r decl.ared the mot i o n carried. BY AUTHC>RITY • ORDJ:NANCE NO. 32, SER..I.ES OF 1971. • AN ORDINANCE VACATING A UTILITY EASEMEJ<..~ LYING AND BEING W ITHIN THE SN Ot.B~ER S .--..D r:V :I.SIO , CITY OF ENGLEWCX>D, COLORADO. (C op~ed .Ln fu11 :Ln the off i.ci.a1 Ordinance Book.) COUNc..z.LidA.N LENTSCH MOVED, COUNC I.X.MA.N BROWN SECONDED, THAT ORDINANCE N O . 32, SERIES OF 1971, BE PASSED ON PrNAL REACitG AND PUBLISHED BY TX"X'LE IN THE ENG LEWCX>D HERALD SENT:t:NEL. Upon the ca11 o~ the rol.l., the vote reau1ted •• fol.1owa : • • • r • • • -4 - Ayes: CounciLmen Sent i , Lentsch, Lay, Kre~1Lng, Dhor ity , Brown, Schwab. Nays : None Absent: None The Mayor declared th e motion carried. Introduced as a B i 11 by Councilman Dhority and r ead in fu11, A Bl:LL FOR AN ORO:XNANCE A.MENDrNG THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONrNG ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO . 26 , SERIES OF 1 96 3) BY ADDING THERETO A NEW SUBCHAP"l"ER , 22.4.A, E"Nr:rTLED ''PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (P.O.) O:r.STRICT, •• AUTI:DR.IZING SAID DISTRICT TO BE SUPER- :I:MPOSED UPON OR COMBINED WITH ANY OTHER ZONED DISTRICT WITHIN THE CITY; REQUIRING THE APPLICATIO N, REVIEW AND APPFU:JVAL THEREOF; AND PROV:D>~ STANDARDS THEREFOR. COUNCI LM.A.N OHORITY MOVED, COUNCXLM.AN SE.NTI SECONDED, T .HAT THE BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBL.ISHED IN FULL XN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD SENTINEL, AND THAT A PUBLIC HE.A.RING BE ESTABLISHED FOR NOVEMBER 15, 1971, AT 8:00P.M. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resulted as fo11cn.~s: Ayes: CounciLmen Senti, Lentsch, Lay, Krei1Lng, Dhority, Brown ~ Schwab. Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried. Introduced ae a B~11 by Counc~Lman Lentsch and read Ln full , A BILL FOR AN O RDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHE.NSI.VE ZONX:NG ORDINANCE OF THE CITY O P ENG LEWOOD (ORDINANCE NO. 26~ SERIES OF 1963) TO CONFORM ALL RESI- DE.NTIA.L DI STRICTS PRrvATE OFF -STREET PARKING REQ UIREMENTS WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 22. 5 -S OF SArD COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE ~ AS A.fo'IENDED BY O RD INANCE NO. 22~ SERIES OF 1 971. COUNC ~ LENTSCH MOVE.D~ COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED~ THAT THE BILL F O R A.N O RDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHED IN FULL 1N THE E NGLEWOOD HERALD SENrrNEL~ AND THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE ESTABLISHED FOR NOVEMBER 15 ~ 1971~ AT B:OO P.M. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resulted as fo11o'WS: Ayes: CounciLmen Senti~ Lentsch~ Lay, Kre11Lng~ Dhority~ Brown~ Schwab . Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor declared the motion carried . • • • - - - -5 - I..ntrodu.ce d as a Bi11 by Cou.nci.1m.a.n Senti and read i.n fu..11, A BILL FOR AN ORO~ AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDJ:NANCE OF THE CZ:TY OF ENGLEWOOD (ORDl:NANCE NO -26 , SERIES OF 1963) AUTHORIZING THE CON- STRUCTION OF "''WW OR MORE UNITS UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS rN R-2 -B RE.S-zDENT'IAL ZONE DISTR.XCT; AND TO REMOVE THE PROHIBITION OF MINIMUM UNITS CON'TA:I:NED rN R-3-A MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTLAL DISTRICT - COUNCXLMAN SENTZ MOVED , COUNCILMAN KREILING SECONDED, THAT THE BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FXR.ST READX NG AND PUBLXSHED IN FULL :rN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD SENT:rNEL, AND THAT A PUBLIC HEAR..ING BE ESTABL.ISHED FOR NOVEMBER 15 , 1971, AT 8:00 p _M_ Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: Ayes: Counci1men Senti., Lentsch , Lay , x.rei.1:Lng, Dhori.ty , Brown, Schwab_ Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried _ :Lntroduced as a Bi.11 by Counci1ma..n Lentsch a.nd read i.n fu11, A BILL FOR AN O RDINANCE FIXING THE TAX LEVY IN MILLS UPON EACH DOLLAR OF THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF ALL T AXABLE PROPERJ."Y WITHIN THE C:I:TY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO, FOR THE YEAR 1972_ COUNCI.LMAN LENTSCH lf9VED, COUNCl:.LM.A.N LAY SECONDED, THAT THE BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHED XN FULL IN THE ENGLEWCX>D HERALD SENTINEL _ Upon the ca11 o f the ro11, the v o te resu1ted as fo11c:rws: Ayes: Counci1men Sent i , Lentsch, Lay, Krei1inq, Dhor ity , Brown, Schwab_ Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried _ City Attorney Berardini. reported to City Counci.1 on the annexatio n e1ecti.on for the property Ln the vicinity o f W est Unio n Avenue and South Santa Fe Drive_ Discussion ensued_ The Ci.ty Attorney was instructed by Counci1 t o c on tinue -i.th the tri.a1s and hearings regarding the West Unio n Ave nue and South S anta Fe Drive a.n.n exa t ion _ City A ttorney Ber a.rd i.ni stated that the State Hi.qhway Department waa drawing up a contract ~or the d•~•1opment or an area at the u.s. 285 and B roadway i.nterchanq•- • -• r 32xl - - -6 - A memorandum from Mr. Stephen A . Lyon , D ~rec tor of Finance , regardLng attached reso1u tio n which wou1 d give Counci1 endorsement to the ARAPS pro- _Jec and an ind1.catJ..o n o f the Ci.ty •s requirements to be met by A.RAPS , was received for the reco rd. RESOLUTION NO. 39 , S E RIES OF 1 971 A RESOLlTr iON C LARIFYING THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWCX>D FROM THE ARAPAHOE REGIONAL Alrl'OMATEO PROPERTY SUBSYSTEM . (Cop J..ed in fu11 Ln the offi.c ia1 Res o1ut i.on Book.) COUNCILMAN KRErLING MOVE D , COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDE D , THAT RESOLlTl'ION NO . 39 , SERIES O F 1971 , BE ADOPTED AND APPROVED. Upon the ca11 of the ro11 , the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: Schwab. Ayes: Counci.1men S enti , Lentsch, Lay , KreL1i.ng , Dhority , Bro wn , Nays: None Abse.n None The Mayor dec1ared the motio n carried. Ass~stant C1ty Manager H c D ivJ..tt reported bri.ef1y to C o unc11 o n the storm drainage c o nduit rea1Lqnment in the vLcinity of the 2600 b1o ck of South Santa F D r~ve . D iscussio n ensued . COUNCJ:LMAN LAY MOVED~ COUNC :I:LMAN BROWN SECO NDED~ T HAT T HE CITY PROCEED W ITH THE GRANr AG REEME NT W ITH THE STATE D IVl:S l:ON OF GAME , FISH , AND PARKS FOR THE DEVELOPME NT OF T HE WEST PORTION O F B ELL EV I EW PARK . U pon the ca11 of the ro11 ~ the v o te resu1ted as f o 11o ws: Schwab . Ayes: Counc~1men Sent~~ Lentsch ~ Lay , Krei1ing , Dho rLty , Brow n ~ N ays : None Absent : None The Mayor dec1ared t he mot~n carrLed . M r. Ke1 1s W agg o ner ~ D 1rector o £ Pub1~c Works . reported b r ief1y to C ity C o unc~1 o n the 1Lmb p~ck -up program . Mayor Schwab reco gnized M r . James McKechnLe, 1209 Ridge Road. Mr . McKechn ie teaches a c o urse Ln pract1ca1 po1Ltics . Members o f City Counci1 discussed t he requ irement t hat a 1 1 a pp1i- cants for 3 .2 beer and 1iquo r 1Lcenses a ppea r befo re C o uncL1 . This r equir e - ment wL11 be d iscussed at a C o unci1 study sessio n . ~----.------=-----------------~-·----------.--.---~~----~.~~ II -- r 32x • • • • -7 - COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED~ COUNC:I.:LMAN JCREILING SECONDED, THAT THE MEETI!<.Ki BE ADJOURNED . Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resul.te.d fo11o-s: Ayes: Counc~Lme~ Senti, Lentsch , Lay, Kreil.Lng, Dhority, Brown• Sch-ab. Nays : None Absent: None The Mayor dec1a..:red the IDOti...on carried, and the m.eet:Lng a djourned at 11:25 P .M. Ex Officio Cl.erk of the Council. • • • r 32x I ( - • - c~ c~f: F I C 1 A L r-L ~ -cuMENT l I 1 C c CITy OF E:f""G L C~~ :-.. ... -It ""SPECX.AL CITIZEN PR<X;R..AM INVITEES, November 1, 1971•• Precinct No. .1. -Hx. acd .Hrs .. Math ias ,. 2109 We s t We s ley Avenue PYecinct No. 2 -Hr. and Mrs. Jim Haskins ,. 281 South Cherokee Street Precinct No. 3 -Hr. and Mrs. Joseph F. Steinback ,. 28 20 South Lincoln Street Precinct No. 4 -Hr. and Hxs. Larry A. Moore,. 4085 South 1nca Street Precinct No. 5 -Hr. and Mrs. Wes l ey E ck ,. 11 64 East Bates Parkway Precinct N o. 6 -Hr. and Mrs. A. E. Bud Qu i nn, 3170 South Franklin Street Precinct No . 7 -H-r. and Mrs. Richard L. Eason, 2261 Dartmouth Place Precinct No. B -Hr. and Mrs .. Roy Shankl.and,. 341.1 South Grant Street Precinct No . 9 -Hr. and Hrs .. William E. Evans, 4050 South Logan Street Precinct No. l.O -Hr. and Mrs. Ray R. Snowberge r, BOO West Oxford Avenue Precinct No. l.l. --· and H _rs. Rol.l.and E. Hiller, 4227 South Grant Street Precinct No. 12 -Hr. and Mrs. o. K. HcConi.1 g1e , 4-465 South E~ati. Street Preci.nct No. 13 -Hr. and Mrs. Haro1d E. Horan. 3348 West Chenango Avenue Preci.nct No. ~4 -H-r. and Mrs. Ear1 HcCu11ough• 4595 South Ga1apago Street Prec i.nct No. 1.5 -H-r. and HTs. B. G. Preston. 4801. South Inc. a Street Prec.i.nct No. 1.6 --Hr. and Mrs. Lester SmJ..th. 4957 South Logan Street --• -1'32X - Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct Precinct • Precinct • • • • - ••sPECIAL CITIZEN PROGRAM INVITEES, November 1, 1971 .. No . 1 . Hr. an.d.Mrs .. Mathia s , 21.09 West We sley Avenue No. 2 -Mr. and Mrs. Ji.m Haskins, 2810 South Cherokee Street No. 3 -Mr. and Mrs. Joseph F . Steinback , 2820 South Lincoln Screet No. 4 -Mr . and Mrs . Larry A. Moore, 4085 South Inca Street No. 5 -Mr. and Mrs. Wesley Eck, 1.164 East Bates Parkway No . 6 -Hr. and Hrs. A. E. Bud Qui.nn ,. 3170 South Frankl.i.n Street No . 7 -Hr. and Mrs. Ric.hard L. Eason,. 2261 Dar trnou t.h Place No. 8 -Mr . and Mrs. Roy Shankland, 341.1 South Grant Sereet No . 9 -Hr. and Mrs . William E . Evans, 4050 South Logan Street No. 10 -Mr. and Mrs . Ray R . Sno,.,barger, 800 West Oxford Avenue No. 11 -Mr. and Mrs . Rolland E. Hiller, 4227 South Grant Street No. 12 -Mr. and Mrs. o. K. H .c.Coni.l.gl.e, 4465 South Elati. St:.reet No. 13 -Mr. and Mrs .. Harol.d E. Horan, 3348 West Chenango Avenue 14 -Mr. and Mrs. Earl. HcCul.l.ough, 4595 South Cal.apago Street No. 15 -Hr. and Mrs. B . c. Preston, 4801 South I.nca Street No • 16 -Hr. and Mr s. Lester Smith, 4957 South Logan Street • I ! <f • • r 32xl • • - ""SPECIAL CITIZEN PRcx;RAM INVITEES , November 1.9 1971 .. Precinct No . 1 -Hr. and.Hrs. M athias , 2109 We s t We .s l.ey Avenue Precinct No. 2 -Hr. and Mr s . Jim Ha ski.ns ,. 281.0 South Cherokee Street P-rec.i.nct 3 -Hr. and Mr s . Joseph F. Stei.nback , 2820 South Lincoln Street Precinct 4 -Hr. and M _rs. Larry A. H.oore,. 4-085 South 1nc.a Street P:rec.i.nc.t No . 5 -Hr. and Mr s . We sley E ck,. 11.64 Ea st Bate s Parkway Prec.inc.e No . 6 -Hr . and Hr s . A . E. Bud Quinn,. 31.70 South Frankl. in Street Prec.i.nct:. No . 7 -Hr. and Mrs. Ri.c.hard L. Eas on,. 2261 Dartmouth Place Prec.i.nct No . 8 -Hr. and Mr s . Roy Shankl.and,. 341.1 South Grant Streee Precinct No . 9 -Hr. and Mr s . Wi.l.l.i.am E. Evans,. 4050 Sou t.h Logan Sereet Precinct No . lO -Hr. and Mrs. Ray R. Snowberger,. 800 West Oxford Avenue. Precinct No . ll -Hr. and Mrs. Roll.and E. Hil.l.er,. 4227 South Grant Street Pr<ll!!ci.nc.t No. l2 -Hr. and Mrs. 0. K. H .c.Coni.l gl.e ,. 4465 South El.ati Sc:reet Precinct No . l3 -Hr. and Mrs. Haro1d E. Moran. 3348 We s t Chenango Avenue Precinct No . l4 -Hr. and Mr s . Ear1 HcCu11ou&h• 4595 South Ga1apa&o Street Prec i.nct No . l5 -Hr. and Mrs. B. G. Pre s c.on, 4801 Souc..h Inc.a Street • Precincc. No. l6 -Hr • and Mrs. Lester Sm.J. t.h• 4957 South Logan Sc.reec. • • • • r 32x • - ••sPECIAL CITI ZEN PROGRAM INVITEES , November 1, 197t•• Pre cinct No. l. -Hr. aod .Mr s . Math ias , 2109 We s t Wesl.ey Avenue Precinct No. 2 -Mr. and Mrs. Jim Ha s kin s , 2810 South Cherokee Street Precinct No. 3 -Mr. and Mrs .. Joseph F . St:.einback, 2820 South Lincoln St:.reet Precinct No. 4 -Mr . and Mrs .. Larry A . Moore, 4085 South Inca Street Pr<ll!!c.inct No. 5 -Mr. and Hrs. Wesley Eck, 11.64 East Bates Parkway Prec.incc. No. 6 -><r. and Mrs. A. E. Bud Quinn, 31.70 South Frankl.i.n Street Precinct No . 7 -Mr. and Mrs . Richard L. Eason, 2261 Dartmouth Place Precinct No . B -Mr . and Mrs . Roy Shankland,. 3411 South Grant:. Street Precincc. No . 9 -Mr. and Hrs . Wi.ll.iam E . Evans, 4050 South Logan Street Precinct No. 10 -Mr. and Mrs .. Ray R. Snowberger , BOO West Oxford Avenue Precinct No. 11 -Mr . and H _r s .. Rolland E. Hil.ler, 4227 South Grant Street Precinct No. 12 -Mr. and Mrs . 0 . K. Hc.Conil gl.e , 4465 South Elati Street Precinct No. 13 -Hr. and Hrs. Harold E. Horan, 3348 We st Chenango Avenue Precinct No. 14 -Mr. and Mrs .. Earl McCullough, 4595 South Ga1apago Street P-rec inct No. 15 -Mr. a .nd Mrs. B. c. Pres ton, 4801 South X.nca Street • Precinct No. 16 -Mr. and ><rs. Lester Smith, 4957 South Logan Street • • • • -• ,. - ""S PECIAL CITIZEN PR<X;RAH INVITEES, November l, 1971"" Precinct No . ]_ ---a .nd .Hr s . M.a.thi.as 11 2109 We s t:. Wesley Ave:nue Precinct No. 2 -Kr. and Mr s . Jim Haskins, 281 0 South Cherokee Street Precinct No. 3 ---and Hrs. Joseph F. Steinback, 2820 South Lincoln Street Precinct No . 4 -Hr. and Mrs . Larry A. Moore, 4085 South Inca Street Precinct No. 5 ---and Mrs. Wesley Ec.k, 11.64 Ea st Bate s Parkway Precinct No . 6 -Mr. and Mrs. A. E. Bud Qui.n_n, 3170 South Franklin Street Prec.i.nc.t No. 7 ---and Hrs . Richard L. Eason, 2261 Dartm.outh Pl. ace Precinct No . 8 -Hr. and Mrs. Roy Shankland, 3411 South Grant Street Precinct No . 9 -Kr. and Mrs .. William E. Evans. 4050 South Logan Streec Precinct No. 10 -Mr . and Mrs . Ray R. SnoW'barger, 800 West Oxford Avenue Precinct No. 11 -Mr. and Mrs . Rol.l.and E . Hiller, 4 227 South Grant Street Precinct No. 12 -Mr. and Mrs. o . K . Hc.Conil.gle• 4465 South El.ati. Street Preci.nct No. 13 -Mr. a nd Mrs .. HaroLd E. Moran, 334-8 West Chenango Avenue Preci.nct No . 14 ---and Mrs .. Earl. McCul.l.oug h, 4595 South Ga1apago Street Pre c i.nct:. No . 15 -Mr . and Mr s .. B. G. P-re s ton. 4-801. Sout-h 'I.nc.-a Street:. • Preci.nct No. 16 -Mr. a .nd Krs. Lester Smi.t:.h., 4957 South Logan Street • • \ ~ • • I' 32 X I • • - ""SPECI.AL CITI.ZEN PR<X::RAM INVITEES,. November 1,. 1971•• Precinct No . ]_ -Hr. and . H::rs. Math ias , 2 109 We s ~ We s l.ey Avenue Precinct No. 2 -Hr . and Mr s . Ji.m Haskins , 2810 South Cherokee Street Precinct No . 3 -Hr. and Mr s . Joseph F . Steinback , 2820 South Li.neol.n Street Precinct No. 4 -Hr. and H _rs. Larry A. Moore, 4085 S ou th Inca St:.reet Precinct No . 5 -Hr. and Mrs. Wesley Ec.k, 1.164 East Bates ParkW"ay Precinct No . 6 -Hr. and Mr s . A . E . Bud Quinn, 31.70 South Frankl. in Street Precinct No . 7 -Hr. and Mrs. Richard L . E a s on, 2261 Darem.outh Place Precinct No . 8 -Hr. and Mrs . Roy Shankland ,. 3411 South Grant Street Precinct No. 9 -Hr. and Mrs . Wil.liam E . Evans , 4050 S ou th Logan Street Precinct No. 10 -Hr . and Mr s . Ray R. Sno"W"barger , 800 West Oxford Av enue Precinct No . 11 -Hr. and Mr s . Rol.land E. Hil.l.er , 4227 South Grant S t reet Precinct No. 12 -Hr. and H .rs . 0. K . McConil.g le, 4465 Sou th Elati Street Precinc.~ No. 13 -Hr. and Mrs .. Harol.d E. Moran., 3348 West Chenango Avenue Precinct No . 14 -Hr. and Mrs. Earl. HcCul.l.ough., 4595 South Cal.apago Street Prec i.nct No. 15 -Hr. and Mr s . B. G. Preston,. 4801. South Inca Street • Prec i nct No. 16 -Hr. and Mrs .. Lester Sm.J.. th , 4957 South Logan Street • • • 1'32X - • - - ••sPECIAL CITIZEN PROCRAM INVITEES, November 1., 1.971"" Precinct No . l. -Mr. and . Mrs. Mathias,. 21.09 We s e Wesley Avenue Prec.i.ncc. No . 2 ---a .nd Mrs. Ji_m H.ask...i.n..s, 281.0 South Cherokee Street Precinct No. 3 -Mr. and Mrs. Joseph F. Steinback, 2820 South Lincoln Street Prec.incc. No. 4 -Kr. and Mrs. Larry A. Hoore,. 4085 South 1nca Sc.reet Prec i.nct 5 -Mr. and Mrs. We sl.ey Eck,. 1164 Ea st Bates Parkway Precinct 6 -Mr. and H.:rs . A. E. Bud Quinn, 3170 South Frankl. in Street Precinct No . 7 -Mr . and Mrs . Richard L. Eason,. 2261 Dartmouth Pl. ace Precincc. 8 -Mr . and Mrs. Roy Shankl.and, 3411 South Grant Streec. PTecinc.t No . 9 -Mr. and Mrs . Wil.l.iam E . Evans , 4050 Sou th Logan Stree.c. Precinct No. 10 -Mr. and Mr s . Ray R . Snowbarger ,. 800 We st Ox ford Avenue Precinct No . 11 -Kr. and Mrs. R ol.l.and E . H.J.l.l.er,. 4227 S ou th Grant Street Prec:.inct No. 12 -Mr. and Mrs .. o. K . Mc.Conil.gle , 4465 Sou th El.ati Street Precinct No. 1.3 -Mr. and Mrs. Harol.d E. Moran. 3348 West Che-nango Avenue Precinct No. 14 -Mr. and Mrs. Earl. HeCull.ough. 4595 Sout:..b Cal.apago Street Prec inct No. 15 -Mr. and Mrs. B. G. Presc.on. 4801. South Inca Sc:reet Prec.i.nct No . 1.6 -Mr . and Mrs. Lester Sm.i.eb• 4957 South Logan Street -- -r 32x • - 0 <• - ••sPECI.AL CI.T"IZEN PROGRAM INVITEES, November 1, l97t•• Preci.n.ct No. l. ---and.Hrs. Mathias, 21.09 e s t Wesley Avenue P-rec.i.nct No. 2 -Hr. and Mr s . Ji.m Haski.ns, 2810 South Cherokee Street Prec.i.nc.t No. 3 -Hr-and Mrs-Joseph F . Stei.nbac.k, 2820 South Linc.ol.n Street Precinct No. 4 -Hr. and Mrs . Larry A. Moore, 4-085 South Inca Street Precinct No. 5 -Hr. and Mrs. We sl.e.y Eck, 1.164 East Bates Parkway Precinct No. 6 -Hr . and Mrs. A . E. Bud Qui.nn, 3170 South Frankl. in Street Precinct No-7 -Hr. and Mrs . Ri.c..hard L-Eason , 2261 Dartmouth Place Prec.i.nct No. 8 -Hr. and Mrs. Roy Shankl.and, 3411 South Grant Street Precinct No. 9 -Hr . and Mrs. W i.ll.iam E. Evans,. 4050 South Logan Street Precinct No. 10 -Mr. and Mrs -Ray R. Snowbarger, 800 We st Ox ford Av enue Preci.nct No. 11 -Hr. and Mr s. Ro ll. and E. H.i.l.l.er • 4227 South Grant Street Precinct No . l2 -Hr. and Mrs. 0-K. Mc.Coni.l.gl.e, 4-4-65 South El.ati Street Precinct: No. 13 ---and Hrs. Harol.d E. Moran,. 3348 West Cbenan&o Avenue Preci.nct No. 14 -Hr-and Mrs. Ea.r1 McCullough,. 4595 South Ga1apago Street Preci.nct No. 15 -Hr. and Mrs. B. G. Preston. 4801 South Inca Street Preci.nct No . 16 -Hr . and Mrs. Lester Smi.th ,. 4957 South Logan Street • l I \ ! -r • • '32x - • - .. SPECIAL CITIZEN PROGRAM INVITE.ES, November 1, 1.971•• Precinct No. 1 -Mr. and.Hrs . Mathias, 21.09 We s t W esl.ey Ave..nue Precinct No. 2 -Mr. and Mrs. Ji.m Haski.ns, 281.0 South Cherokee Street Precinct No. 3 -Mr. and H .rs. Joseph F. Steinback,. 2820 South Lincoln Street Precinct No. 4 -Mr. and Mrs. Larry A . Moore, 4085 South Inca Street Precinct No. 5 -Mr. and Mrs. Wesl.ey Eck, 11.64 East Bates Parkway Precinct No . 6 -Mr. and Mrs. A. E. Bud Quinn, 3170 South Frankl. in Street Precinct No. 7 -Mr. and Mrs. Richard L. Eason, 2261. Dartm.outh Pl. ace Precinct No. 8 -Mr. and Mrs. Roy Shankl.and, 3411 South Grant Street Precinct No. 9 -Mr. and Mrs. Will.iam E. Evans, 4050 South Logan Street Precinct No. 10 -Mr . and Mrs. RAy R. Sno-barge r, 800 West Oxford Avenue Precinct No. 11 -Mr. and Mrs. Rol.l.and E. Hil.l.er, 4227 South Grant Street Precinct No. 12 -Mr. and Mrs. o. K. HcConil.gle, 4465 South El.ati. Street Precl.nc.t No. 13 -Mr. and Mrs .. Harol.d E. Moran,. 3348 West Chenango Ave-nue Precl.nct No. 14 -Mr. and Mr s .. Earl. McCul.l.ou&h,. 4595 South Gal.apago Street Precl.nct No. 15 -Mr. and Mrs .. B. G. Preston. 4801. South 1nca Street Prec.l.nct No. 16 -Mr. and Mrs. Lester Sm..l.th,. 4957 South Logan Street -• \ \ I -- r 32xl • • YO: Sta nl.c y JJ. Dial. • 0 - INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM F ROIA: K e l.l.s Wag goner SU BJE-CT : PAVING DISTR1CT 21. • Th e £ol.l.owing ~s a l.~sL o~ s Lr ccts and ·al.l.cys ~or possib l e i.ncl.u .si.o n in Pavin g Di stric t. 21 'Lor the summer of 1972: St.rect:s: 2700 s. Acoma St. 2800 s . Acoma St. 3000 s. Ac oma. S t. 3100 s . Ac oma St. 4500 s. Acoma St. 2000 w. Coll.cge Ave. 2100 w. Coll ege Av e. 2200 w . Co11 cgc Av e. 2300 w. Col.l.ege Ave. 2000 w. Corn e ll. Av e. 2100 w. Co:rnc11 Ave . 2200 w. Cornell. A .ve. 2300 w. Corne 11. Ave. 3200 s. Del.aware St. 3600 s. 2000 \\". 2100 w. 2200 w . 2300 ,,. - Al.l.eys east o:f: 3600 s . 3700 s . 3800 s. *3700 s. 3500 s. 3900 s. Acoma Acoma Acoma Br oadwa y Fox Fox 2700 s . El.ati. St. 2800 s. El.a ti. St. 2900 s. El.ati. St . 3400 s. Emerson St. 4300 s . Gal.apago St . 1800 w. I1i:!:! Av e. 1900 w. Il.i.:f.:f Av e. 2000 \\'. Il.if:f Ave. 2100 w. Il.i££ Ave. 2200 w. Il.i1":f Ave. 2300 w. I1i:!:£ Ave. 000 E. Lay Lon Ave. 200 E. Layton Av e . 300 E. Layton Ave. Pennsyl.vani.a St. Ynl.c Yal.e Yal e Yal.e Ave. Ave. Ave. Av e . 3500 s. 3500 s. 3700 s . 2700 s. *4200 s. *3300 s. Huron Inca Lipan Lincoln Sh e rman Washington *Al.l.e y s wi.~h p c ~~t~ons taken out but not returned . Ri ght-of-way o~ 40 f et w~11 hav e to be acqu~red on West Ya1 e Av enue fr om T ejon to Zuo~. Th e ~-£oot ad~acent wa1k Lh at ~s proposed on boLh s~des o~ W. Co11P ge Av e. wou1d encroach 1~ 1ect onLo Lh c 7 -1oot casement p1atted on tbc 1oLs. • I I I • • I =r T 32X - - Pavin g D istric~ 21 pag e 2 O ctob e r 20 , 1971 --- The a11ey EasL o1 3300 SouLb Washington wou1d hav e to hav e storm sewer insLa11ed bc~ore we cou1d pov e and, there~ore, is d e p e nd ent upon th e storm sewer proj ect as proposed . Atta ched i s a map showing tbc l.ocation o~ the pr<>P.<>Se d streets a n d a11eys. A cost esLimate wi11 ~o11ow. S inc ere l.y ~ ----/.. /,-/(.~/.c 7 Cc-- K el.l.s Wa ggo n e r D irector <>~ Public KW :pd a tt . Works -- T 32X • C ITY 01"" ENGLE W OOD ;.. s STREETS ALLEYS • 0 - PAVING DISTRICT NO. 21 (PROPOSED) • I I -----.. :-::::.."; ~.; .. :: \ ! ~ • • T 32X MO ... ~D AY MONDr\Y l"o".ED!'.;"I:Sl>A Y O.DAY ~D 'ESD. '> 0-DAY ONDAY \ EDNESDAY MONDA Y WEDNESDAY MONDAY MO DAY WEDNESDAY WEDNESDAY MONDAY WEDNESDAY WEDNESDAY FRIDAY WEDNESD...-\ Y' •ION DAY THURSD..:.Y :FRIDAY WEDNESDAY • O c tob r 18 . 1.971 D ecombe1· 6 , 1971 D ec mbcr 20. 1971 J anuar y 3. 1972 J anuary 5. 1.972 J anu;.lry 12 . 1.972 Jan uar y 17 . 1972 Jan u~r y 19, 1972 J anuary 24, 1972 F b1uary 7, 1 972 F bruary 9, 1972 F ebruary 21, 1 972 February 23, 1972 Apri 1 3 1972 Apri l. 3 . 1972 April. 5, 1972 April 1.2, 1972 Apr i 1 17 , 1 97 2 April. 19 , 1972 April. 26, 1972 April 28 , 1972 May 1 , 1972 P.lay 3, 1972 t.l3y 15, I972 Jun e I' 197 2 June 16 , 1972 s e ptembe r 27, 1972 • Li.st. o.I. SL~"-celb avai.1ab1c :C or C o uoc i.1. Auth orizat.ion 1or ne got i.at.i.oo and adv er Li.s i 11 g :Cor pilot o1 b ond i ss ue. S c l.cc~i.ng 1i.rm :Cor £i.sca1 services and b ond hand ling. C onsider resolution o1 int.cnt t.o :Corm Pavin g Di sLr~cL N o. 21 Firs t. Publ.i ca L ~on oi not.i.c S econd pub1ic at.ion o1 noLic Mail. not.ic 11 a11: c t d ropcr t.y owners. Third pub1 1cati n o~ noLic Public h earing on £or~aLion o1 D is Lri L (spccia1 m L~ng). Xntrod ucLioo o~ a bi11 ~or ao ordinanc creatin g Lh c Di s Lrict . Pub1icaLioo o~ bi11 ~or ordinan ce. S econd reading o£ bi11 ~or ordinance . F~oa1 pub1ication o£ ordinance. Curb, guLter ~ sidcwa1k permit cuL -o1 £ date. Notice to ·contractors and bond sa1e authorized . Pub1ish ~irst notice to conLractors and bond houses. Second not~ce to contractors and bond houses. Plans and Speci£ications avai1ab1e. Third notic e to contractors and bond houses. Fina1 dat e £or private concrete construction. O pen Construction bids at 2:00 PM. Ope n bond bid s at 2:00 PM, award contract ~or abov e at 8 :00 PM, introduce bill. £or an ordinance to issue and se11 bonds, bond s dated Jun e 1st. Publication o£ bi11 to se11 bonds. Pa ssage o£ ordinanco on 1ina1 reading. EsLimatc d date o£ start o~ construction. Proc eeds o~ bonds received. Ord inance in £u11 e~£ect. Estimoted date o~ comp1etion o£ project. • • • I' • • • • 0 - 'I WORKABLE PROGRA:\1 CITIZENS • Special ~leeti.ng co~t~~~~~~W c .~ Members Pr ese nt: P.lembers P..bse nt: Oth ers Present..: O c~ober 14, 1971 J. Louis Parkinson; R . G . Woods~ Jr .; Malcolm E. Collier, Jr.; Bi.11 Boom; Berry Slater; Beverly Gonzales; Gilbert Valdez; George Johnston; Wil..liam Stevenson; :Edna Tourtelot; Judi.Lh B . Henning; Ruth Allen; Charles H ennin g; Edna Hern; Jacques Sta c khouse; Vi Weist; Art Ryan; Reverend Herbert Hosanna; and Councilman ~tilton Senti. and Herbert Mayor Elmer ~c hwab, Councilman Dallas Ohority, Councilm::ln HO'\.\•ard Brown, Council.Jnan Leo Lentsch, Councilman John Kreiling, Ci ty Manager Stanley H. Dial, Pssistant City Manager William McDivitt, City Attorney Bernard Berardini ~ and Director of P1anning James L . Supinger. The meeting was ca 11ed to order at 8:05 p.m . by Chairman P a rkin son . The purpo se of the meeting was to discuss the Workab1e Program Ap p1ication~ which had been approved by the Committee on Septem- b er 23~ 1971, and ~orwardcd to the City Counci l. for their con- sideration and approval.~ and subsequent submission to the De -- partment o£ Hou sing and Urban Oeve1opment for certificat ion. Mr. Supinger summarized the Workabl.e Program a!_:';>1ication as it h~d been approved by the Committee and reviewe~ the activities of the Committee, inc1uding the tour of the City in which the Committee had participated . ~lr. Supinger a1so to1d of the Com - mittee· s· efforts to become better informed about the HUD pro- grams by inviting several. representatives of the Department d Hou si n g and Urban Deve1opment to attend the meetings . Discussion of the app1ication and the funding that wi11 be n ecessary to :i.mp1cment the program out1ined in the app1icati.on fo11owed. The Committee and the Cout"lci1 members discussed the creation o£ a Local. !lousing Authority for the ·city . The members o :C the Committee exp1nined to the City Cou n cil. that they had d ecid ed to de1ny the circu 1ation of a petition f or ~he creation o:C the • • • - • • • • .. - Authority until such time as the sta£f bad prepared fact sheets explaining the Local Housing Authority and the Urban Renewal. Author ity . Xt is the opinion of the Committee members that an educational. program should be carried on in the City to inform the citizens about the activity o f the Workabl-e Program Citizens• Com.mittee , and the various JIUD programs which are avai..1ab1e,. most particularly the Loca1 Housing Authority and the Urban Renewal. Au thority before petitions are circulated. The special. meeting was adjourned. Res pee t1:.u1_1y submitted,. Recording Secretary, Pro-tem • • • r 32x lc • • CITY O F ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING C OMMISSION O ctober 5, 1971 Cl~o~.F L.:::.cL._"~c~ I. CA LL TO ORDER. The regu1ar meeting o:£ the City P1anning and Zoning C ommission was ca11ed to order at 8:00 p.m. by Chairman Car1soo. Members pres e nt: Senti : Vobejda: Lentsch ; C ar1son; Barton; Patrick; H enni n g t mber-s absent: A1so present: 11- Supinger, Ex-o rficio Weist: Mosbarger Assistant Director o f P1anning D. A. Roman s; Messrs . P terson: Braun , Tho~as, Waggoner TES . tr. Car1son stated that the Minutes of Sep tember 21, 1971, were to be cons1dered £or approval. Lenc sch moved: Vobejda seconded: The Minutes o f September 21 , 19 71 , be a pproved as written . Discussion fo11owed . The vote was ca11ed: the motion carried. Mr. Weist e nt e red the meeting a nd took his seat with the C ommission. .LE cn.o - Mr. Mosbarger e n tered the meeting and took his se at with the C omm ission. III. OFF-STREET PARKING SURVEY Apartment Interviews C ASE #23 -71 Mr. Supinger stated that the staff of the P1ann i n g Department had con- ducted a survey of the parking situation on a samp1ing of apartment houses. Mr . Supinger stated that the re s u1 ts of this survey do not give support to the proposa1 to raise the o ff -street parking requirements. The survey revea1ed that genera 11y peop1e were satisfied with the park ing provided~ a nd were not interested in additiona1 open space if it meant the 1oss o f their parking area. The average cars per unit_ according to the survey~ is 1 .25. Mr. Supinger stated that this wou1d indicate that there is no need to increase the parking requirements. Mr. Sup i n ge r stated that the sta'ff does recommend~ however~ that the Co~issio n consider setti n g standards £or maneuvering space in parking 1ot s~ and requiring the provision of spaces f or g uest parking. Mr . Car1son as k ed :i.f the tenants were u si n g the parki..ng that is being provid ed~ or :i.f they are parking on the street? H e a1so asked how tenants cou1d be persuaded to use the off-street parking that is pro- vided? ~~-Supinger stated that he fe1t the new parking requirements~ approved in August ~ 1971~ wou1d he1p in getting extra ca rs o ff the street . Mr. Patri c k asked if the questionnaires were sent to tenants and managers of apartment houses~ and to the resi dents of si n g 1e-f ami1y homes next to the apartmen~ units? Mr. Supinger stated that the survey was con- du cted by inter view~ rather tha n mai1 i n g the questionnaires out~ and that residents o £ sing1e-fami1 y homes were not inc1uded in the interviews. Discussion fo11owed. Mr. Lentsch stated that he fe 1 t f rom the resu1ts of the survey that the staff was saying the parking restrictions didn•t need to be i n creased from 1:1 t o the 1-1 /2:1 for efficiency units~ etc . that was approved in August by t he City C ounci1. Mr. Lentsch asked~ if -1- • • • r [ - • • • the survey showed an average o~ 1.25 cars per unit, where the .. 25 car was parked? Mr .. Supinger stated that it is parked on-street,. and pointed out that the parking that was being provided even under the 1:1 ratio averaged out to 1 .. 02:1.. Mr. Supinger stated that he fe1t the new parking requirements approved in August are va1id, but he stated that he didn•t think there was justification Cor requiring 2:1 across the board. Mr . Weist asked how the 3 ~ .. samp1e .. was chosen,. what determined those apartments and indiv~dua1s who wou1d be interviewed? Mr .. Supinger stated that they were picked at random.. Atr .. Weist asked i£ the staff £e1t that a 3 % samp1ing was va1id? Mr .. Supinger stated that he fe1t it was pretty va1id,. but did state that he wou1d have 11ked to have more than a 3":1, samp1~ng. Mr .. Weist asked why the .. streets are c1ogged·• with cars 1~7 as the survey ~ndicates . there seem s to be adequate parking o.f£-streel:? Mr .. Supinger stated that he :fe1t the survey indicated that there were more cars per unit than the parking spaces being pro- vided.. But. he stated. he sti11 fe1t that the 1-1/2:1 ratio that was approved £or efficiency units 7 increasing with the number of bedrooms per uo~t. that was approved in August was va1id. and that the 2:1 ratio across the board was not JUStified .. Mr .. Weist asked if there had been comp1aints about the convenience o f the parking 1ots as to 1ocation 7 etc .. Mr .. Supinger stated that there had been come comp1aints . but that more comp1aints had been received on the 1ack o£ adequate maneuvering space. Mr .. Car1son asked members o:f the audience if they wou1d 1ike to speak on the matter? Mr .. Ree ce Braun 3173 S. O gde n Street -stated he wa s an architect by profession. and that he has designed apartment houses.. He stated that he has done work in Eng1ewood. and throughout the state of Co1orado. Mr .. Braun stated he wou1d be most interested in com.m.ents of the res~dents o£ sing1e -fami1y homes next to the apartment houses on the matt er of park~ng.. Mr .. Braun stated that he has done projects recently ~n Jefferson County 7 Lakewood. and Federa1 Heights. and the deve1opers are providing 1-1/2:1 ror one bedroom units; 2:1 for two bedroom un~ts. and 2-1/2:1 for three bedroom units. He noted that these sTandards are not set f orth ~n the zoning codes as requirements. but are ·•requirements·· of the deve1opers of the un~ts he has des~gned. r . Braun noted that efficie ncy units can have two cars per unit easily. and stated that the trend for required parking :for these units is 1-1 /2:1. lr .. Braun discussed ••poorly 1ocated·• parking 7 and noted that a 11 tenants want to ·•park right in :front of their doorn.. He stated that ~r the tenant didn't 1ike the 1ocation of their particu1ar park~ng space. they are in 1ined to park on the street rather than in their space.. Mr. Braun noted that the City can contro1 on-street parking 7 and has the power to restrict any and a11 parking on the streets.. He stated that he wou1d 1:J..ke to see the City consider requiring p arking o n the ratio that the deveiopers of Lakewood 7 Jefferson County and Federal He ights seem to be prov~ding in their developments; he stated that he fe11: th~s wou1d stop the encroachme nt of apartment deve1opments upon the sing1e-~ami1y resident~a1 areas. Mr .. Braun stated that the in- dividual home owner has a mora1 right to park his vehic1e on the street in front o~ his home .. He stated that he :fe1t if a deve1oper for an apartment comp1ex needed additiona1 1and to meet the parking require- ments and other amenities required of him 7 then the deve1oper should get the additional 1and. and if he does not do so. then the develop- ment should not be permitted • ~Jr .. Car1son asked Mr .. Braun :if it wou1d be economica11y feasib1e :for a deve1oper to prov ide the 2:1 parking ratio? Mr .. Braun stated that it wi11 be possible to meet these requirements and have the d e ve1opment be economi ca11y feasib1e . He pointed out that a 1ot w o u1d de p end up o n the qua1ity o f the development. the size o f the deve1opment. etc.. Mr .. Braun pointed out that there must be additional .. give and taken on the part of the City. and cited , £or examp1e 7 that the setback req uirements -2- • • • /'32X • • • which were £easib1e ten or twenty years ago are not necessari1y practica1 today. He stnted that each deve1opment shou1d be reviewed individua11y to get the bes~ ror the City as a who1e. Mr. Virgi1 Thomas -stated that it seemed to him that the City needed to work toward c ontro1 of dens1ty: be noted that the more peop1e that are crowded into a sma11 area the more prob1ems exist. Mr. Thomas stated that he didn"t £ee1 the 2:1 ratio wou1d work a hardship on the bui1ders and deve1opers. and he fe1t that the qua1ity of construction wou1d be up-graded. tr ... Thomas £urtber stated that he fe1t there shou1d be more open space between the apartment bui1dings than is being required; he stated that this c ou1d be p1anted and 1andscaped, and he felt that such a step wou1d improve the quality of the environment. Mr ... Braun pointed out that the ·•regulations are not retro-active·•. and stated that "what we have existi n g today we are stuck with until they are torn down and replaced. •• He stated that he and Mr. Thomas are trying to get across the point that what is required and built according to those requ~rements today. "we are stuck with to:rnorrow." He stated that he was ask1ng •• :Cor a better tomorrow ... " Mr. Peterson Chamber of Commerce -stated that the members of the Chamber of Commerce are co n cerned about the quality of construction in the City. He stated that i£ the quality was improved. he felt the de- veloper could be assured of a better occupancy rate in the future. Mr. Peterson pointed out that there is now no vacancy rate in Eng1ew<><>d. and the developers can demand what they want to. Mr. Peterson stated he would 1ike to see the 2:1 ratio "across the board". and stated that he felt ·•it wi11 average out".. Mr .. Peterson stated that he fe1t the City might be encouraging developers to build a greater number of ef- ficiency units by requiring on1y 1:1 parking for this particular type unit. Mr. Peterson stated that be felt the residents of sing1e-fami1y units in a mu1ti -fami1y zoned district shou1d be interviewed on the parking situation. Mr . Peterson stated that he was asked to speak for Chamber of Commerce President A11en, and stated that Mr. A11en is a contractor and has bu11t severa1 apartment bui1dings; plenty of parking is provided,. and Mr. A11en has .fe1t that the additional expense this has caused w111 be returned. Mr .. Thomas commented that responsib1e bui1ders shou1d rea1~ze that the best interest oL the co~unity is also their best interest. Mr .. Weist stated Lhat he f e lt there was an attitude in Eng1ewood that ·•we have enough apartments". He asked if. in the contro l of popu1ation density, it was felt that: additional parking requirements. m o re space between bui1d.l..ngs, et:c. was the appropriate way to ap p roach it? J..Jr. Supinger stated that 1£ the Ci ty wanted to contro1 the popula tio n density. he fe1t that parking re quirements was not the correct way to do so .. Mr. Supinger pointed out that there is a great dea1 of land z o ned .for apartment use that 1S not so deve1oped. ~~. Lents c h a s ked if the City should set a goal of the number of apartments that is £e1t to be Leasib1e? Mr. Supinger stated that be fe1t .it should be the concern of every com.mun:i..ty to have "goa1s". ~tt . Peterson stated he wasn't thinking particu1Br1y of 1imiting the population density. but that he was concerned about the quality of con- struction. He stated that he ''isn• t eager to see three -story apartments a11 over town ·· .. Discussion £o11owed. Mrs. Henning stated that she was concerned. and pointed out: that we are consideri ng a .. prob1em of cars", which wou1dn't be tota11y solved with more parking spaces . She pointed out that she fe1t an improved mass transportation system wou1d be o~ grea t aid in the solution of this problem. ~~s. Henning noted that she fe1t the parking ratios for efficiency units should be raised to 1 -1/2 :1. b ut not to 2:1 .. -3 - • • • • I' - • • • Mr .. Carl.son asked what ratio was fe1t appropriate for guest parking? He sugge~"l..ed perhaps 1 :4? Mr. Sup:inger stated that he fel.t this might be too high. and suggested possi..b1y 1:10. Discussion :f o11owed .. Mrs .. Romans discussed a situation of an apartment owner who was a11owed to buil.d an apartmen t bouse (27 units) and provide four l.ess parking spaces than was required at that time.. The deve1oper 1ater atte~pte d to pro- vide additional parking on the rear o£ l.ots he owned across the a11ey £rom the apartm ent house~ but was denied by the Board of Ad ~u s tmen t and Appeal.s a~ter opposition £rom neighbors.. Mrs .. Rom ans stated there was need :Cor ''l.oadi.ng space'' and spaces for the service vebic1es which necessari1y £requent apartment units . It was a1so pointed out by Mrs. Roman s ~hat ~here ~s usua11y a charge for an off-street parking space, and some tenants w~11 park on -street rather than pay the fee . Discussion .Co11owed. Len~sc h moved: Weist seconded: The P1anning Department staff be directed to draft an ame ndme nt to the C omprehensive Zoning Ordinance requiring o ~f -st reet parking spaces to be provided f or guest parking on a ratio o£ 1:5 (on e space £or each five units), and raising the requirement f or an e.Cficie n cy unit to 1 -1 /2:1. This proposed amendment is to be sub- m i t ted t o the P~3noiog Commission £or f urth er study and the setting oC a pub1i c h eari n g date . Discussion fo11ow ed. Mr . Berardin.i noted that whatever the minimum standards are that may be esta blished by a C ity , they become the maximum standards for the developer. Further discussion fo11owed. The vo te was ca11ed ; the motion carried with ~~-Senti voting nay. I V . STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT 1972 73 Work Program C ASE #24 -71 Mr. Supinger stated that an addendum to the staff report had been pre- pared and given m e mbers. Set for th in the addendum are staff recommenda - tions for p rojects to be i n c luded in the request to the State Highway Deparunent ~or the 1972-73 Work Program. Mr. Wa ggoner d1scussed the v ar1ous categor ies and how they are funded . He noted -chat the T OPI CS program is to be g radua11y phased out. Dis- cussion :f:o11owed.. M r. Supinger not ed that the P1anni..ng Department staff could not recommend that the ov er-passes, at U .S. 285 and Logan or Sherman and U.S. 285 and Elati Street, be included .i n the request. Mr. Lentsch asked who drafted the requ ests to the Hi ghw ay Department. and asked why t.he requests cou1dn•t be submitted to the Planning Com- mission £ar enough in advance that th ey would have sufficient tLme for adequat e co n s~deration o£ t h e requests? Mr. Supi..nger stated that the requests were dra£ted by the Planning Department and Public Works De- partment . H e pointed out that the notification from Arapahoe County had been received by the Ci ty on O ctober 4. 1971, and that notification from th e State had been recei v ed in the Planning Department on Septem- ber 27th . Mr .. Wei st asked :i..f any of the i.t e DJ.S c ou1d be considered ••controversial•'? Mr. Sup i n ger stated that he fe 1t the request that Clarkson from Ya1e to Littleton Boul e vard be placed on the Federal.. Urban System could very wel.l b e c ont roversia l . Mr. Supinger stated that there woul..d be a meeting at the Greenwood Vil ~ge City Ha11 on October 13th, at which time the matter of Clar k son Street and other matters would be discussed. He stated that this w ould b e a meeting with Planning Commissioners of the jurisdiction s c oncerned, and hoped that members of the Commission wou1d make an effort to attend_ The matte r o f establishing priorities was discussed. Mr. Waggoner s tated that Dartmouth Avenue and South Santa Fe Drive was a very bad i ntersection and that s omething must be done to improve it. Mr. Waggoner a1s o pointed out that the proposed widening of Broadway is of great im- portance to the downtown merchants. He also discussed the drainage prob1em at South Federal. Boule vard and West Union Avenue. -4 - • ' • • I' 32X [ • • • Patrick moved: Lentsch seconded: The P1anning Commission recommend to the City Manager the fo11owing be submitted to the State Highway De- partment for inclusion 1n the 1972-73 Work Program: Federa1 Aid Urban System: Add to System : a. C1arkson from Ya1e to Littleton Boulevard. b. Quincy from Yosemite to Wadsworth. c. Ya1e from University to Federa1. d. Windermere and Santa Fe Lane from Ridge Road to Kenyon. e. Kenyon from Santa Fe Drive to Broadway. £. Union Avenue from Federa1 Boulevard to Windermere. g. Tufts from Windermere to Broadway. Urban System Construction Projects: 1. Broadway from Ya1e to U.S. 285 to be widened to same width as Broadway south of Quincy. providing 1eft-turn pockets. 2. C1arkson from U .S. 285 to Litt1eton Bou1evard. Construct~on Projects: 1. Improve West Dartmouth Avenue at its ~ntersecti on with South Santa Fe Drive by widening both the east and west approaches to accommodate two 1anes in each d~rection, with a 1e£t-turn poc ket. It is rec om- mended that the west approach be 300 feet 1ong a nd that the east approach be 250 feet 1on g . There is a 60 foot right-of -way on Dartmouth and it is proposed that 56 feet of this right-of -way be uti1ized f or the traffic 1anes and 1eft-turn pocket --the 1eft-turn pocket wou1d be 10' wide and the two i nner 1anes 11· wide, and the two outside 1anes 12· wide. 2. South Santa Fe Drive widened and improved to a six-1ane major arteria1. 3 . Improvements to the Santa Fe Drive and West Union Avenue i n ter - section, exten ding Union across Santa Fe to Windermere and then tieing into West Tu£ts Avenue. 4. Broadway from U .S. 285 to Quincy to be widened t o the same width as Broadway south of Quincy with a painted m edia n providing 1ert- turn pockets. 5 . Widen Be11cvicw £rom C1arkson to San ta Fe with 1eft-turn pockets at those intersection s where a study shows they are warranted. 6 . Improve the ofr-1ane from U .S. 285 westbound on to East Hampden Avenue at approximate1y South Lafayette Street. 7. Insta11 storm sewer at Federa1 and Union. 8. Storm in1ets on the north side of Be11eview from E1ati to Big Dry Creek . TOPICS : 1 ~ Signa1ization of the Santa Fe/Uni on intersection. 2 . Rep1ace the existing contro11er and signa1 heads f or more efficient operation at South D o wning and Eas t Dartmouth • 3 . • Add a no ther group t o the master tra ffic contro1 system which wi11 take counts every 15 minutes and ad~ust the master contro11er to accommodate the heavy f 1ow of traffic. -- • • • • • • Mr. We~st asked why the over-passes wou1d be de1eted? tr .. Waggoner stated that he wou1d 1ike to s p eak in £avor of 1 n c1usion of the over- passes.. He noted that there is cons1derab1 e pedestri an traf fic crossing U .S .. 285, that the highway is a v ery wide street. and that when pedes- trians use the pu sh -buttons to cross the highway, it backs traffic up £or several blocks.. If pedestrians don•t use the push-buttons, they cannot cross the highway in the time allotted the cro ss-s treet move- ment. H e stated that if the over-passes were i nstalled, a11 ground - 1eve1 crossi n gs would b e elim i nated ; he £e1t this action would £orce the pedestrian to use the overpass, and improve tra£fic movement along .. s .. 28 5 .. Mr .. Carlson asked Mr. Wa ggone r i...C schoo1 chi..1dren crossing at Lo g-an and Sherman s tr eets were c au si n g a prob1em? Mr .. Waggoner indicated that the chi 1d ren crossing at these points were o £ concern . and stated that at one t~me an under-pa ss had been c onsidered. but in 1i~ht or prob1cms that cou1d resu1~ from that. the over-passes seem ed to be the best so1ution to the situation.. Brief discussion :Co11owed . The vote was ca11ed: th e moti..on carried, Mr .. Weist and Mr. Barton vot ing nay .. V. FLOOD PLAI DISTRICT C ASE =25-71 Mr .. Sup:i.nger s tate d that the date .Cor Pub1 ic Hea ri ng on this amendment to the C omprehensive Zoning O rdinance had been moved from O ctobe r 19th to Nov e mbe r 9th.. He suggested that th e proposed amendment cou1d be discus sed at Lhe me eti ng of O ctober 19th .. VI. DIRECTOR 'S C HOI CE Mr .. Sup i n ge r discussed the meeting wi..th representati-ves o f Greenwood V i 11age, Litt1eton, Cherry H i11s Vi11age, Arapah oe C ounty and Eng1ewood, which has been schedu1ed for O ctober 13, at Greenwood Vi11age City Ha11. 5788 South U1ster Street. He pointed out that thi..s meeting wi11 be devote d to discussi on of proj ec t s s ubm itted to the State Hi..ghway Depart- ment .for i..nc1usion i..n the 1972-1973 Work Prog r am.. ~t.r. Supi..nger urged members to atLend thi..s meet~n g , i ~ poss i..bl..e .. ~rr. Berard~ni ga ve ~he res u1ts of the annexation e 1ecti..on he1d O ctober 5th i..n an area West oL Santa Fe Dr1ve which both Eng1ewood and the C~ty o £ Sheridan had tried to annex. The resu1ts were: For annexation 3; A g ainst annexation --2 3; For a nne xation to Eng1ewood --6; For annexat1on to She ri dan --3 .. VI..l . C OMMISSION "S C HOI CE Mr. Car1son d:tscussed a 1etter he had received from the Leag ue o :f Wo~en Voters regarding th e estab1isnment o£ bicyc1e trai1s in the City of Eng 1ewood.. Mr. C ar1son stated that the City o£ Litt1eton has es- tab1ished such trai1s , and the City of Denver has the matter under con- sideraL~on at the present ti..me .. Mr .. Supinger stated that Ci..ty Manager Dia1 asked him to make a recom- mendat~on oo the prope r approach to this matter .. Mr .. Supinger stated that h e had .received a 1etter fr om the Ci ty of Denver on the estab1ish- menL of b~cyc1e trai1s, and that he had s u ggested i..n rep1y that the c~ties shou1d work together on the estab1ishment of the bicyc1e trai1s, and asked ~hat a me e ting b e ca 11ed f or this pu r pose.. Mr .. Ca r1son asked that P1ann i n g Director Supinger answer the 1etter :from the LWV and sug - gest that the staff is working on the matter. Mr .. Lents ch reported on the C onference f or P1anning Of :fici..a1s he1d i..n Bou1der Septembe r 30 and O ctobe r 1. He stated that he wou1d 1i..ke to hav e Mr .. Joe Sinunons, who was a s p eaker at the Conference, meet with the City Pl.anning Co:m.nti..ssion and City C ounci1 .. Mr .. Lentsch stated that he £e 1t Mr .. Sim.mons· presentation was exce11ent, and he fe1t a round - tab1e discussi-on wou1d be very worthwhi1e .. -6- • • r 32xl - - - Mrs. Henning stated that she -as ~ery impressed with Mr. S~ons• presentation a1so. Mr. Senti stated that be :fe1t the entire conference was .. exce11ent ... Mr. Patrick stated that he was very interested in discussion on Bou1der•s attempt to 1imit popu1ation density ; he noted that it seemed to be the c oncensus that such an attempt wou1d not stand up in court. There was discussion on the procedure o:f submission o f the P1anning Com- mission minutes and recommendati o ns to City Counci1. I..entsch moved: Mosbarger seconded : The meeting be adjourned. The motion carried; the meeting adjourned at 10:30 p .m. -7- -• • - T 32X [ - - - - REGULAR MEETING O FFICIAL.: ~ COU ~~tL ~OCUM ENT ENGLENOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD l" l .,, October 19, 1971 cou;.. vu .... c CIT'Y O P' ,...,.GL. • 0 D . C:.0\..0. The m eeti...1g was ca.11ed to o rder by Cha..:i..:rma.n Robohm at 5:03 P-M . f I ELECTION COMMISSION CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ~ COLORA.DO OCTOBER 18 ~ 1971 C:.C>'""" ... _ -• • .. G FILE CITY OF E N GL E •..,·ooo. C:OLQ.. The E1ect i o n Comm ission of the City o£ Eng1 ewood , Arapahoe County . Co1orado ~ met at 6 :00 P.M. October 18 , 1971 , Ln the Finance Department o f the City o f Eng1ewood , Co1orado . Present: Mr. C. L. Haddox Mr _ Wi11i.a.n Hanso n Mr. D e an Herndon, D eputy C i ty C1erk The E1ection Commissio n approved the nominat i on of judges and a1ter- nates f o r the November 2 , 1971, Genera1 Municipa1 E1ection. The Commission a1so approved a 1etter to be sent to a11 candidates and judges o f e1ecti.o n regarding e1ectioneering within 100 feet of a po11ing p1ace. Since there w as no further business before the Comm1ssion, the meeting adj o urned at 6:10P .M. De-an Herndon Deputy City C1erk • -• r 32x • • • REGULAH ME.E'..riNG E 'GLUIOOD WAT ER A N D SEWER BOARD l j 1 October 19, 1 97 ~ cou ... C I TY o pr :--.:c;.L.-~· The M eet:i..ng was ca11ed to order by Cha.:1.r:ma.n R obor...m at 5:0) P ... M. Me mbers F rese t : Y.embers Absent : R obotun., H arder R osvaJ.l., K.rei..1i.n g 11 Lay, Mock , M enger Horton, Schwab .. ~D.. co .... o Other O££i.ci.a 1s P r esent: Uti.1i..ties ~rec to r C arro 1 1 11 Legal Con sultan t Sh i vers , Ib F a1k J o r g ens e n , C onsu1ti.ng E~neer, As s i s tant Utiliti.es Dir ector Brads h a w. ].. PRESENTATIO"'I OF PROPOS ED WATER S T ORAGE P ROJ:EX:T BY I B F A~K JORGENSEN, CON SULTING EKG =:NEER' Mr . Carr oll rir st intro d u c ed to the Board , Mr . Ib Fa1 k Jorgensen , o£ Jor gen sen and Hendrickson, I n c . which £irm is curr e nt1y under c ontra c t t o the City to design and b uil.d the n~w six mi.11 ion g a 1 1on water storage £aci~ty to be 1ocated s o uth east o£ ~he i.nter s e ction o£ Bellevi ew Av e . and C l a rkson S t . Mr . Jorgensen was presented as a reco g n iz e d authorit y i n t h e £ie~d o £ pre-stressed concrete construction . hav i ng s erved as chairman o £ the Ameri c an C o ncrete Institut e Comm:ltte e 344 ''Ci...rcu.J...ar Pre- -s tress e d C o ncrete Structu re"; and whose f~m ~e now under contract to the City of Denver to s t udy" and m ake rec o mmendations as to methods f or correcti ng structur~ defe cts i n o ne o £ the i r recently constructed w ater s t o rage tanks . Mr Jorgensen p resented a s ket ch depi cti ng the locat ion o £ the new str u cture in re1ation t o the e~st i ng storag e tank s a t that l o catio n . He stressed that t he pro posed and ~sting t anks were to b e inte r con n ected to faci1itate clean~n g and maintenance. and that t he p 1ans ~1 c on£orm to Gree nwood Vi11age construc ti on a nd aes thetic r eq ~rements . Hr . Sch wab ~ved and w as s eated at 5 :12 P .M . During the discussion t hat e nsu ed. :t'..r . C arroll r eport-ed: that Greenwood V1..11 age was aware that H.u .n. f und s c ould p robabl y be obt a~ed tc a s sist them in p r ov id~g a b att ery o £ tennis courts on top o£ h e p r opos ed reservoir and that t h e admini stration o £ t hat m urrl.c ip ~:1.ty s e emed t.o be quite h.apoy at the ~roB'Pect o £ "lavi..ng such a £a- c:1.1ity. H e also r e ported that ~he targ t date for co~le ~on o~ b e p roject ~s next surmn.e r . Mr. Carrol..1 rep1:1 e d tt--....at rur..::Js •ere ava.:1.l..a. 1e ~ra. ~t rojec:'la w1.~hj_n the department. f"or a t l..ea st t he in.1.t1a.1 st..a e or i.e oroj c • F-un "'r~ the R.a.ncb Creek i..esue w1..11 n o t. &.11 be n e eded f"or ...:J c ye"!!lre . Event·..:1a.l..l..y. C:1•y ~ eh i..mprovsnents a nd the m et.eri..ng p rograme o r Oftresa . !.t vou.J..d p :ro'bal :1. •e:ry to s ecure additiona.1 fi na.nc:i.ng . 2 . PROPO SED SuPPLEl'-'!ENT /1.32 TO SotrnmATE SA•-..-=-:"A.T:tO ...... II::S"!"R.ZC':' CO~R•S AGREEMENT Mr . Carro1 2 next pre s e n e d to the Board tne r •• o ~ Sou h«•~ S a~tat~on ~st~ct to 'i.ncr ease the si.ze of t h at l)j_st.r:1.ct by t..he addj_ :i_o or ~Si acres o~ l...and bordered on t h e n o r th by O rchard Road. on the by South Dahli.a and on the west by Colorado Bou1eva..rd ... Mr . Ro bohm :Lnqu:j__red a s to t he n umber ot tap e thi...a a d ded :1..ncrement wo~d prov1..de and as to our c aoac:i.t y to trea t t he add:1..ti.ona1 wae'C-eWater • Mr . Carr o ~l r e p1:1.ed t hat the tract wou 1d eventua11y pro~de abou t LSO add:1.tiona1 tapa and that our p lanned sewer p1a.nt e:xpa.nsi.on wo uJ..d p r o v1.de adeq uate capac:i.ty £or t.h.:1.a increase. He added that the curren t annua1 r ate of ~crea s e i..n £low i s 18 ~. \ I ~ • • 2xiC - • • • Therea..f"t e r .... r~:R. LAY MOVED , Jo.'IR .. R O B::>HM SEX: 'DED, THAT THE BOARD RECOI"''MEND TO THE G ITY C OUNCIL THAT THE LAND DESC3.IBED TIJ SUPPLD-'IENT NO . 32 TO THE CO ECT OR 'S AGREEMENT JITH THF SOUTHGATE SANITATIO~ DISTRICT BE APPROVED FOR IN - CLUSION I N THAT DISTRICT AND THAT SAID SUPPLD1ENT BF APPROVE D AND PROPE=tLY EXEX:UTED BY THE CITY .. • Ayes: Nays : R obohm, Harder, Rosvall , Krei11n g , Lay, Mock, Menger, Schwab None Absent: Horton Mr .. Kreiling then inquired w h e ther the Director or ~he Board members had knowledge of impendin g c~1 struc tion near the corner o£ Holly and Arapahoe Roads . He reminded the Board tha his area which lies just west o£ Southgate Sanitation District is ~ a drainage basin downstream of the old Englewood Dam . Extensi ve c o nstruction here, he pointed out, cou1d increase the run-off dur~ng heavy r ains and t hereby c reate a severe .f"1ood hazard to the City o£ Englewood . Mr . Carroll agreed to apprise the offici~ls of the Urban F1ood & Drainage District o£ the situat ~on and to point out the concern s of the City o f Englewood that developmen t of this area b e carefully controlled to exclude the flood threat to the City . 3 -METERING PROGRAM Mr . Carro~~ next dir ected the attention of the Boar d to two doc uments that they had received by mail p reviously; MEY.O TO: Water and S ewer Board, S I ~JECT: Proposed Meter- i n g Progr am , DATF: October 12, 1 9 71 (Attachment 1 ) a nd Inter-O.:!'.f"ice Memorandum TO: Stanley H . Dial , City Manager , SUBJECT: Met h ods o£ Finan c:i.ng Metering Progr am DATE: August 10, 1 971 (Attachment 2). He re~nded the Board that when the last 10% increas e in w a ter r ates w as passed in December of 1 969 , it was und e~st ood that a similar increase would £ol1ow in December of 197 1 . A cc o rdingly the 1972 budget was ca.l..cu1ated on the assumption o f such a r~se . With ou~ such a raise the d e partment w ou1d lose abo ut $5L,OOO during 1972 . The metering pro~am could help offset this loss by p roviding some inc r ease in tota1 revenue {s ee Attachment 1) w hile r educing demand fo r treated w ater du.r·ing the next four to :f':i.ve years ~ thus enab~ng the C ity ~ delay the construction o£ add~tiona1 w a ter t r eatment £ac i.l~t ie s , with attendant financing costs . ~x . Carroll then exp1a1ned to the board the three-phase pro g r am (see Attachment 1), h e would propose for converting all. City w a ter accounts from flat r ate to meters . Through t h e use o:f' a Cr:i.ticU-Path D:i.a.grarn. he demonstrated tha t the t"i...roe required to complete this p r ogra m, assumi ng the solution 114 method of .:!'i.n.ancing~ (see Attachm.ent 2) w ou_1d be about two years . This, he expl ai ned~ meant t hat i f' the Board r ecommend ed the pl.an favorably to the City Council at. this m e et'i.ng the convers:i..on sould be completed by 31 Dec . 1973. ¥~. Rosva1l. expressed c o n c ern as o the resistance t h at the public w o uld exoress tow a rds the p r ogr am and inq uired h o w the t r ansition to metered bi1 l~ng w oU1d be hand1ed . ~x . Carro11 rep lied ~h at a11 conversions to meters w ou1d be accomplishe d fi r st, then a11 ransfers to me t ered b:1..11~ng w o uld occur on the same d ate to avoid inequity in this area. Further, he poi.nted out that the P rel.~nary Phase o£ the proposed progr am in- c ::l.u ded ;:>u l"-~i c rela ions activ:i.ties inc1u.d~.,g use o ~ t he Water News f'l.yer to inform and e d u ca e he p u lie as o he need for this c o nversion . ~r. Bradsh aw added that in his recent contacts w±th local cit~zens who bad called the De p artmen~ with prob1ems relating to w ater service, he had found a substant~aJ.. number who were deep1y c o ncerned with w ater w aste as it affects the e n t'i.r-e country and who w ant ~o see a o rogr am implemented which wi~ discourage those who now waste water ~ great q u~ tit~es thr o ugh ignor ance o r disregar d or sound irrigation p r a c tice . The Sity's insoection p r ogram ~ he added could never be as effective in making water- wa s ters c onserve t his resource as w ou1d a metering system which ties costs direct1y to u s fS t:~• Mr . Schwab 2n~u i r ed as to the comparative c oets of metere d wa~e r in surro und1 ne c om- m~n~t~es ~th m eter ed water sold by Engl ewood . -2 - • • • • • • • v~. C~rol1 rep1~ed that using current rates and assum~ng a mo nthly~~ o£ ~000 P~1lo s per mon h, E ng1ew ood customer pays $31 .32 annua11y wh11e h~s counter- a rt i n Litt1eton DAYS SL2.60 for the same s~ce. ~r . Rosv&11 i nquired as to the cost of meter installation . !".or . Ca.rrol...l.. repl...:ied that h:1.s ca..1cu:tat:i..ons show that the average meter inst.a11at:1.on by an in-house team putting the meter 1n a pit at the property ~ne shou1d be 1ess than $100 w-hich figure wou~d :1.nc1ude abo ut $25.00 labor costs. Mr. Menger observe d that $2 5 .. 00 seemed cheap for that job. Mr . Ca.rroJ..1 replied that the meters wou1d not a1.1 b e i.nsta.1.1ed at the property J.:Lne . Where circumstances were appropriate, meters wou1d b e inata11ed inside the bui1~ng and equipp ed ~th remote registers to pr~t outa:1.de reading. Each such insta11ation woul...d provi.de a net savi..ng to the property owner of $28.00 . He 1..nctl.cat.ed~ however that he woul..d not. l..ike t.o insta11 all. meters i~de since many C~ty residences a.J...rea.dy have meter pits availab1e from previous years when they were served me~ered water from De!T'I7er~ and because house insta.11ations o£t.en 1eave room ror boot.l..eg 1..rr:1..ga.t:1.on taps t.o the se~ce 1ine upstream of the meter. Mr. Lay expresse d the opirrl..on that the p roblem. o£ bootl..eg irrigat.1..on taps would not be very-great.. Y...r . Robohm. inqu.:l.red as t.o how the property owners wou1d oay for the meters . Mr . Ca.rro11 repl.i.ed that the costs cou.:Ld be IUDOrtized D"fTer a. pe:ri..od o£ 10 years w:lth the customer pay:i..ng about $l..l...OO/year dur1ng that period . There ensued a. discussion concern.1.ng f'i..nanc1ng wher ein the proposed relocation o£ the Mc.Lel..l..a.n Putnp Stat.:1.on t.o a new 1ocat:i.on on City D::l..tch was mentioned . Hr . Sh1ve.rs took this occasion to emphasize to the ~ector and the Board that ony such rel..ocation that wou1d prevent the City from pump~ seaaona1 rlood waters from the Platte ~ver into McLel..1an Reservoir w ould caU8e the City to ~ose ~he prese nt C1ood w ater decree ~:a~!~dh~!~:; -~~ ~~a;i~=~ ;:~;r~he~::~e~~;:a:a~:rc~: ;~~s~:ere:n McLellan Mr. Kre:1.1:1.ng suggested that Un1..on Street pumps m:1.ght be used to City Ditch i.nstead of the McLe11an Pump Stat~on pumps . ~~. Carroll.. agreed that the Department would cons~der either using Union Street Station pumps or insta11ing oversized pumps i n a relocated pump station that would enab1e tbe Department to suclc water out of the P1att.e R:f..ver dur1..ng periods of £'1ood:1..ng to i.nsure against ~oes of our £1ood wa er decrees there . Mr . Rosval...1 was excused and depart·ed at 6:23 P .M . ~~. Schwab then inq ~red what actio n the ~ector desired at thi s ti.me . Mr . Carroll rep1i.ed that he was requesting that the Board r e co!!lr1end the meter program to City Counci1 so that the Council. cou1d act on it by 15 November 197~. MR. HARDER THEN MOVED., MR . >CENGER SECONDED. THAT THE BOARD R ECC9<J'END TO niE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE DIRECTOR OF UT=IES BE AUTHORIZED TO IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM DESIGNED TO CO"lVERT ALL ENGL:EWOOD FLAT RATE WATER A=OUNTS TO METERED ACCOU'JTS WITHIN A PERIOD OF APF'ROXD1ATELY TWO YEARS; TO SELL BO 'DS AS NECESSARY TO FINANCE THE CONVERSION AND TO PROCEED WT'ni THE WORK USING IN-HOUSE PERSONNEL REINFORCED AS NECESSARY BY ADDITIONAL HIRING FOR THE DURATION OF THIS PROJECT . Ayes : Ro boh m ~ H &rder ~ Kreiling ~ I..a.y., Mock ~ Menger, Schwab a::rs : n one A bsent: Hort o n ~ R osva11 -.3- • • • \ ! :r T 32X - • • • 4. P ROPOS ED LICENS E A G RED<ENT F OR e m DITCH REAI.IG NMENT AT SOt!Tii CHEROKEF AND WEST KENYOl Mr. Carroll. next p res e n ted t o the Board a request .f"ro m the Lynnco Investment Co. £'or a licens e to enclose i n cond uit and alter the course o £ the City Ditch where it adjo~ns their p roperty near the i ntersect.:i.on of So. Cherokee and West Kenyon . ~o presented were two qu:it claim deeds b y which the Lynnc:o Investment Co ... propose t.o exchange pa.rcel..s o£ :l..a.nd to get t :.1.t1e t.o t ha t p a.rceJ.. where the cH.tcb now runs and on which they w:i..sb to b uil.d and t o g:i.ve t1.t1e to t he City o£ that oa.rce1 to which the d.i..t.ch w-m be diverted w h en the ditch i s rea..1 :1.gned . Mr ... Ca.rro11 poi..nted out that the reali.gnment would have no adverse e££ec t o n the d i tch; the enclosure o£ the ditch wou1d be an asset to the City and that there is ample p recedent for t~s ac tion . After a brief d.i..scussion ••• MR. KE::ta:iER MOVED, MR. ROBOl::D'! S E::.O NDED111 THAT THE BOARD AUTHORIZE THE CHAIRMAN TO EXEX:UTE Ti-lE DESIRED LICENSE AGREEMENT AND THAT THE BOARD RJ;X;OMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE CITY APPROVE THE EXCHANGE OF LAND PARCELS INVOLVED IN THIS REALIGNMENT OF 'lHE CITY DITCH AND THAT THE APPROPRIATE Q U IT CLAIM DEEDS BE APPROVED AND PROPERLY EXECUTED BY THE CITY. Ay"e.s: Robohm, Harder, Lay, Kre~i..ng, Mock, Menger,Schwab Na,y-e: s: none Absent: Horton, Rosva..l.J. S . N OTIFICATION BY THE EPA OF VIOLATIONS OF THE J.699 REFUSE ACT Mr . Ce..rro1J. then adv-i.sed the Board that the Envi..ronmenta.1 P:rotect1..on Agency had not.1..f1..ed the C1..ty that the C1..ty 1.s 1..n ~o1at1..on of the 1899 Refuse Act wher~n 1..t 1..s d1..sposing o£ water treatment backw~h water 1nto a na~gabl..e stream. He further reported that the C'1.ty' e: Consu1t.1ng Engi..neer had suggest:..ed that the C1..ty put the burden on the State to det.erm:l.ne and not:\..f'y u.s as to whether we a..re i.n v::1.o1at:1.on of the Act . A.f"ter ~ecuss:i.on, the Board asked Mr . Sh:i.ve.re to l..ook :i._n-ro-t.he :matter and adv:i..e:e on a course o.f' a.ct:i.on. Mr. ~vera then a~sed the Board that Col..orado State B~ No . 81 had changed the law ~tb regard to abandonm.ent of wat.er :ri..ghta . Whereas :i._n the past the burden of proof has been on the comp~nant to prove an 1ntent to abandon water ~ghts, Senate B:1..1..1 No. 61 ha.a now made :1..t a duty o£ the State Eng-1.neer to dec:i.de on the baa:i..s o£ histor~ca1 data whether the act~v:1..ties o£ the owner of water r:i..ghts :1..n~cate that the rights have or have not been abandoned. Under ttu..s new procedure, a.ccord:i..ng to Mr. Shi.vers, our Boreas Pass water right.s may a..1ready" be :i.n jeopardy. The Board in response requ es"t.ed both Mr . Shivers and Mr. Ca.rro11. to pursue a1J.. leads that they may get that cou1d resu1t :1..n an offer to ourchase the Boreas Pass water ~ghts , eo that the Board may have t.he opportun ~ty to a.ct on a f:1..rm of~er. Mr. Schwab e nd Mr . Lay were excused and departed the meet~ng at 6:58 P.M .. 7 . Mr. T .H. Harder then adv~sed the Board that he -vas concerned about the C:lty'e practi.se o£ cbarg:1..ng property owners for the changeover of water mains made 1n the streets a djoi.n.i..ng the:1..r property. He :i..ndi..cated that .i..n vi.ew of the .l..ate hour and th.e fact that severa1 of the members had other a :ppo:1..nt.m.enta to keep that be wou1d agree to oos t po ~n g th:1..a matter, b u t asked that i.t be 1.nc1uded :1..n the agenda for the November meeti.ng. Jo'!"...r . Ca.rro1.1 agreed to the request • • • I' 32 X I • - There being no further bus~ess to come be..f'or e the Board ••• Y.R .. R030HM MOVED• Y.R. MOCK SECC~ED,. 'nfAT THE MEFTING B E ADJC UR..~ .. Robohm, Harder,. Kre11 ~ng , Mock , Menger ays : n o ne Absent: Horton , Rosva11 ,. L ay,. Schwab Rec.orcl:i._ng Secr etary • • • • • \ ! =r T 32X [ - • - - • ~ORAN DO'l-~ TO TH E Et.:OLEooJOOD CITY COt CI~ REJjA...lU)~ ACTION OR RECOMl':E!'"DATIO OF THE E:NGLEWOOD WATER A> SEWER BOARD O c o ber 1 9, 1 9 71 Approva1 o£ Supp 1ement No . 32 to Connector•s Agreement ~th Southgate San:1.tat:1.on Dietr1ct RECOHY.ENDATIO~<: That the 1..and de~cr:1.bed :1.n Supp1ement No . 32 to the Southgate San:1.tat:1.on D:1.str1ct Connector's Agreement be approved for :1.nc1usi.on :i.nto that D:1.stri..ct and that ea:i.d supp1ement be approved and proper1y executed by the C:1.ty. Respect ~u11y su~tted, ENGLFAOOD ~ATER A"fD SEWER BOARD L ... A . RObObm , • • • r 32 X - • • • • EW.E3. BOARD DATE: Auth~ri~~~~n~ £'or Meter~ng Program RECC'l'·, =::~DATIC"": ThP .._e Cou ci1 authorize the D!.rector o£' l1ti J.i. ties 1",o i "!101e:""tent his program to convert a11 City C1at rate water accounts to netered accounts ~ hin a period o£ appro~mnt e1y two years; to se11 bonds as necessary o finance the conversion and to proceed ~th the work using in-house person~e1 reinforced as necessary by additiona1 hi~~e ~or he duration of this project . Re spectru11y submdtted, • • ,3 X - DATE : c;·BJ~T: • • • • OcLober 19, 1 971 That the Counc~J approv@ the exchange o£ land parcP1s which w~J] enet1P-the Lyn nco Investment Compar.y to rea1~gn the course of the City Ditch as necessRry ror their proposed corstrcction neRr the intersection o~ South Cherokee Street and ~e st Kenyon Ave nue ~rrl that the neces:=ary quit cl.a:l.m deeds be properl.,y executeci by the City . RE<;PECTFU1I Y StiBP-~ITTED , ENGLENOC>D WATER A•'D S~ BOARD \ ! '! • • 1'32xl[ • • • • M. E ~ 0 TO ' .Jat er and ~e"'er ~a :r d Ch~rle s E . Carrol~, J r ., ~rec to r o~ Ctil i ties DATE: October 1?, 1971 St~BJEX:T: Proposed Me tering Progr:=<m L ast srr i ng the Bo a r d reque s ted the Uti1 ~ties Director to nake r ecommendations in S e n tcmber a s to the metering p ro gra~ and its at ~er d an t p roble~s and solutions . R e ce ~t1y I tol d t h e City Manager that ~etering co u1d reduce the s p rinkling by as ~uc h as 50%. Th e ma n ager exnressed c oncern over the cash position rel a tive to redu ced water revenues . Subsequently , I s howed that, a1tho ugh the user may reduce hi s co~sumpti on , he wi11 s t ill cay ~ore than he would on fl a t rate . This is h YPothesiz ed as follows . In addition to the domestic requirements based on water using £aci1it~es in t h e b o u s e , a householder on a 50 foot lot pays $19 an~~ for a11 lawn i rr igatL~g ($.95 X 50' v L q trs ). I£ the irrigating season is 6 months long, he oays an average o.f' $3 .16 monthly . What does the average per son use 1.n irr igation? A hose permits a 5 gallon per minute flow . If two hoses are used twice weekly for 3 hours each , a.l...znost 100,00 g~1ons will be used £or srrink- J.ing . For $1 9 , he is paying only $.19 oer 1 ,000 gallons . Now , i£ the individual o aid $.42 per 1 ,000 (the third step d own ). the c1ty woul d receive $L2 -an increase of $2 3 just £or lawn wa ering . Maybe he w~11 cut his snrin~ing in half (not likely). The metered income fo r lawn w atering alo ~e would be Z21 -s t ill mo~e than we currently receive on flat rate . The Pres ident has unveiled his pl.an ror Phase II of the ~age and p rice f reeze . He ho pes to exte d it until A pril• 1973 . It aopears e v ident to me that our current rates wi11 remain in effect d uring a11 of 1 9 72 . If w e meter a~1 services i n 1972-1973 our net loss of r evenue ~11 be reduced ! We can, w ith n eter, b e i n a n o ver-all bett er financia1 status at the end of 1 973 th an if we r~n on fla t rate duri n g t he same period . Fo llo~ng i s a pl.nn o r i mp le~entation . s h o uld t he p rogra m be approved . Pre l iminary P hase: 1 . U se t h e ·.-J a ter N ew s .i"'l yer each b::i.J_1ing c yc2e pub1..i..cize the program. 2 . Develop an i nventory of exact req u:i..r emen ts , to !..ncJ..ude: Y~npowc r and e quipment, i..f' d o ne "in h ous e" b . '.lumber of meters n reviousl.y removed and stil...J.. usable T o a1 amo unt o f new m eters to o u.rch.ase Dev e~o o i n st a 11at~o n routes =n v ite b ids o n meter s and ot~er h ardware • Attachrte~t 1. • • T ..;)2 X • • • • Page 2 Memo to Water and S ewer Board 5 . Concurrently develop financing measures 6 . Prepare cost account~ng ~stem for subsequesnt bi11ing Insta11ation Phase: 1. !'!oti....f"'y a.£:J:ected :1.nsta.11ation r outes weJ...1 in advance 2 . Perform ~ns a11at~ons Post Inst~J..a ion Phase: 1 . Close out cost accounting; prepare bills 2 . Determine ~0 year a~or tization schedule £or each account 3 .. Remit b:1.11e Between now and the November meeting I wi11 develop a deta±1ed progr am :J:or the inst~ation of meters . One itp~ which we will have to address is the method o:J: conversion . I am enc1os~g a memorandum which I recently pro~ded the City Manager, listing sene alternate solutions . Ho p e£u1J..y, we can decide this issue at the fo r thcoming meeti~g. CBC/kr Encl.. • \ ! <!' • • I' • • • INTER-OFFICE TO' Stanley H . Dial,. C:i.ty ~...a na.ger August 10, 1971 FR.rt-"": Char:tes B .. CarroJ...l, Jr .,. Di...rec o r of Uti.li.tj__es Methods of F'ina.nc:1.ng Met·ering Program Statement of the problec: To finance the installation of meters for 8,500 accounts . Factors bearing on the problem : 1 .. The p r operty owner assumes the entire financial burden accord ~ng to ~s ing policies . 2 . ':'he individual cost wi~ be high .. 3 . Many p r operty owners are on .f"j_xed income , some with e.x:ist-:i.ng: j_ndebtedness for p re~ous assessments . L . The Water Fund cannot p rovide the funds witho ut going to b o nds . Backgr ound on the problem : Property o~ners a1read,y face i ncreased water c osts if the r ates a re inc r eased by 10%, as is the rec o rmr..endat:i.on . When t he ·,later E oard and City Counc~ apor oved the o r ogr am they wanted a solution to both the financ ing and the timing or the p roject . Pa~ of the so~utio is to ~ke the o wner s financial load a s l i ttle as poss~bl e . Possible solut~o~s to t he oroblem : 1 . Sell $1 ,8 00 ,000 in ~~ds and do he project by c ont r a c t . T his will increase t he annual debt by $200 ,000. The fund cou~dn 't a c corno date this un~ess w a ter sales increase d a cco r dingly . Wate r production wo ~d have to be i:"lcreased by an a v erage o£ 2 .2 I-':G D or r ates wouJ.d h a ve to incr ease o ver 10%. - 2 . Sell 2 ,)00 ~000 in bonds £or the meter iryg p r ogram , additiona1 treated sto r age and r eloca ion of he ~cLellan pump station . T he same co~~ents as £or soJ..u ion ~1 as r e gards the metering . ). Set a ta r ge~ date that a11 services must be metered and borrow separately £or the o ther mentioned imr:.rovements . I c an foresee an unhand:;-en..f"or c e- ment p rogram as he arget d ate oasses and hal£ the se~ces are not co-verted . 0-...n"'ers w o t.J ld b e subject to higher plumber costs ii" r equests ~o r p J..umb i g se ~~ces p eaked . Maybe this :ls ~he price they pay £or having h?d t h e money longer to be used e lsewhere. Attachme nt 2 \ ! '! • 1'32X • [ - • • • ?n.;e 2 Memo to S an1ey H . D-1.~1 August l..v , 1971 • Se11 onds , bring on rorce ~ccoun n~~~~e r s a n~ do the job ~n-house . ~he ov~~~1 cn~t would he 1ess as 1he Ci~y wou1rl P1imina e the midd1e- ~an ~nd ~s~~b1y be -r cor ro1 h@ workmansh~ • The amount or erso~a1 serv"i.c@ requir ed would be accomod st ed easier . Create srec'i.A1 iMOrovement. dis-t.r 1..cts wh i.ch would be sel.f susta:t .-,i..~g . 0-..rner s could r1ore eas"i.)y spread he d ebt aver a. 1onger tern. The c~sh rlow wou1d not be co -m"i.~g1ed ~t.h the regular wa~er ~unds . Again, a contract would be dif£icu1t to monitor sati.s£acto~~1y as oppo5ed to in -hou~e accomp1ish~e nt . he prob1en.: The C:i.ty wou.J..d take an i~entor-y of" a.11 nroperty owners who h~ve meters whl ch have been removerl £ro service . These meter s wo~d be evn.l.uated !·or continued use .,. set 1..n place and the propert:.Y ow-ner wou1d sti1~ pay ~ £1at ra~e until the given date £or start~ne the Metered r e te. This would £aci1~tate learning the tota1 scope or conversions . Boulder £ou nd that there were many occasions that e~ra time wou.J..d be needed for c~~1 b~cks , service in eruptions, etc . ~hat wou~d have been di£ricu.J..t to adm~n1..ste r ~n a contrpct . The ~ocAl n1umbers were not a~ous to take o n this project ther e o r e here was A mi~~um of o r essure from the plumbing s ector . I £ee1 th P t the di rect cos to the ~roperty owner coul..d be cut a~st in ha1£ and t h ey co~1d o ror~t e the bi11 over an extended period . C3C/kr • • r 32x - - C f'7"l-c'5 t; ~fLC: I 4 L -Oocul\;fei"V"r .J. ' 1 RESOLUTION NO_ A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD OF THAT CERTAIN MAINTENANCE CON- TRACT, UNDER DATE OF NOVEMBER 1, 1971. BETWEEN THE STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF COLORADO AND THE CITY OF ENGLE - WOOD RELATIVE TO THE LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION OF THE INTERCHANGE LOCATED AT U _ S _ 285 AND SOUTH BROADWAY STREET IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO- NOW. THEREFORE • BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD~ COLORADO, as fo11o~s: Section 1. That the Mayor of the City of Eng1ewood is hereby authorized and directed to execute that cer- tain maintenance contract, under date of November 1, 1971, beeween the State High~ay Commdssion of Co1orado, a body corporate, acting for and on beha1f o£ the Divi- sion of Highway~ and the City of Eng1ewood, wherein said contract provides for the cooperative insta11ation and maintenance of 1andscaping and beautification in and around the interchange 1ocated on U.S. 285 and South Broad~ay Street in the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 1971_ Attest: _ __.::'-o.:s:.;t::.._ _ _:day of I, Stephen A. Lyon~ ex officio City C1erk of the City of Eng1e~ood~ State of Co1orado~ do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true~ accurate~ and comp1ete copy of Reso1ution No. 40 ~ Series of 1971. • - \ ! !r r 32x - - • ! RESOLUTIO:s! •o. o._~ SERIES ;~F.._:·9;~'-"L-\..:_ 0 ~· 'd,';zo A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION BY THE MAYOR OF THE CITY OF E• GLE h'OOD OF THAT CERTAIN HAINTENANCE CON- TRACT, UNDER DATE OF NOVEMB ER I, I97I, BET\..rEEN THE STATE HIGH\,JAY COI'IMISSION OF COLORADO AND THE CITY OF ENGLE - WOOD I~LATIVE TO THE LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION OF TilE INTERCHANGE LOCATED AT U.S. 285 AND SOUTH BROAD\-JAY S TREET IN TilE CITY OF ENGLEHOOD , COLORADO. NO\,J, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEl,'OOD,. COLORADO,. as £o11o"t.;rs: Section 1. That: the Nayor o£ the City o£ Eng1ewood is hereby authorized and directed to execute that: cer- ,t::ain maintenance contract , under date of November 1,. 1971,. bct:,;v-cen t:hc State Highway Corm:nissi.on of Co1orado,. a body corporate ,. act::i._ng for and on beha1£ of the Divi - sion of High\.V'ays.., a..rtd the City of Eng1C\V'Ood ,. wherein sai..d contract: provides for the cooperative i.nst:a.11at::i.on and mainten ~,ce of 1andsca.ping and beaut:ifi..cat:i..on in and around the interchange 1oc ated on U.S . 285 and South Broadway Street: in the City of Eng1ewood ,. Co1orado. ADOPTED AND APPROVED t:his I97 I . Attest: ex ofFicio City C 1erk -~:~-- --=1c::s:..:t :._ __ day of Nove..mbcr I,. Stephen A. Lyon,. ex officio City C1erk of the Cit::y a£ Eng1eW'ood,. State of CoJ.ora.do,. do h e r eby certify t hat: the above and foregoing is a true ,. accurate,. and coTnp1ete copy of Reso1ut:ion No . 40 S eries of 1971 . . ' / -/?'?/· -;_ ' . _/,/' 4f;/--~ ex off~cio C~ty C1erk ~ ~ -- • • • • Ctt:l!: c~G F' • e t A L R £""?-, acuMEN-,.. f I ' ~o ur '--•-., 0Fr CNGL __. ~-•LE t.. ... voo. coLa._ AGREEMEJ.,o'T BETWEEN THE CITY OF E!'GLEli.'OOD, COLORADO AND VAN SCHOOl'.:""E VELD. SHEPHERD A.'-'"D CO. IT'S INDEPENDENT AUDITOR THIS AGRE~~~. made and en~ered in~o by and be~ween the City of Englewood, Colorado, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called the CITY and Van Schooneveld, Shepherd, and Co .• hereinafter called INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, witnesseth that: 1. For and in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the Ih~EPENDENT AUDITORS agree that they will make an examLnation of the balance sheets. revenue, expenditure and budget comparison statements and related income, fund balance a .nd retained earnings statements of the funds of the CITY including ~he Firemen's Pension Fund, Police Pension Fund and Employees Pension Fund for the calendar year ending December 31, 1971. Audi~ cos~ for the above men~ioned pension funds must be sub- m i~~ed individually for each fund, and separate from the cos~ of the audit of all other CITY funds. 2. It is agreed that the CITY will pay ~he AUDITORS in February of 1972 for 90% of the work that has been completed up through January of that year. and the balance when the audit is completed. 3_ It is agreed that the examination will be made in accordance with the generally accepted auditing standards. Insofar as considered applicable by the ~~EPEKD~~ AUDITORS, the auditing procedures will follow those prescribed in Governmental Accounting Auditing and Financial Repo~ing. a publication by the National Committee on Governm~ntal Accounting. Copyright 1968 (Pages 131 -147). It is agreed that the scope of the • II • • J m '-" ~ c • • audit: shall. be that: of a general. audit as prescribed by the above reference on page 127. 4. The examination sha11 not: incl.ude the preparation of the fol.lowing for any and al.l. funds: A. Combined bal.ance sheets. B. Balance sheets. C. Custody of funds and security for deposits- D. Bonded i ndebtedness E . Analysis of changes in fund bal.ance or retained earnings. F. Revenue. expenditures and budget comparisons. G. Statement of revenue and expense. H. Budget summary. I. Schedul.es supporting the above financial statements. J. Trial. bal.ances of al.l funds to be audited. K. Reconcil.iation and pro~sion of det:ail.ed tape of subsidiary ledgers. aging of accounts receivable. and analysis between funds. It is agreed that the CITY is responsible for the typing and r e production of the desired number of copies of the audit: report. S. The CITY agrees to submit to the INDEPEND~7 AUDITORS the exhibits. stat:ement:s and schedul.es subject: to t:he examination as they are compl.eted and will. endeavor to have them all submit:t:ed by not l.ater than February 15. 1972 . and the INDEPENDE~7 AUDITORS agree to exert every effort t:oward compl.et i n ,g the audit at t:.he earlies't possi.bl.e date thereafter and in no event more than approximat:el.y 45 days after the date of the l.ast: exhibit. st:atement and/or schedul.e is submitted to them. 6. The CITY agrees ~o pay ~he INDEPENDENT AUDITORS on a per ~our rat:e as fol.l.ows: -2 - ~--~------------~----~~--~~~ . ..:.. . • • r 32 x • • • T i tle of Accountant Pa:r1:ner Sen i or Accountant Senior Assistant Junior Assistant Secretarial • Rate Per Hour s 30.00 s 24.00 s 18.00 s 12.00 $ 6.00 7. It is understood that the AUDITORS represent themselves as well qualified in municipal accounting. and fu~hcr that they agree to exercise due care and diligence and to discharge their professional services specified as efficiently as possible. The AUDITORS intent will be to keep the aggregate fee as low as possible. commensurate with the services actually performed. but not mo r e than $12.050.00. The AUDITORS should consider in their tota~ fee. that they must appear before the Counc il to present their report upon i ts completion . In addition. it is understood ~at the AUDITORS wi11 provide a ._management letter•• with their eva luation of accounting procedures which may be ~proved by the City Administration. 8. Should the AUDITORS encounter a situation during the course of the audit that could not be anticipated at the time of this agreement. and should this situation. in the AUDITORS• opinion. require them to make a much more detailed examination than they had originally anticipated in order to satisfy themselves as to the reasonableness of the representations made in the financial statements. and therefore increase the cost of this audit over and above the amount stated in this agrcemen~. ~hen ~he AUDITORS agree to submit to the Council Auditing Committee. in writing. the problems they have encountered. The AUDITORS writing shou~d be as detailed as necessary to explain the p roblem and must include ~heir recommendation as to the course that should - 3 - • • • r 32x • • • • b e f ollowed i n order to complete the audit in a _business- l ike manner . The AUDITORS' recommendations must also include their estimated additiona l cost. computed in the same as paragr aphs five and six of th is agreement . 9 . It is understood that the C i ty's ability to provide the items enumerated in paragraph four are dependent upon the avail - abili ty of per s onnel in the CITY'S Finance Depa~oent. In the event the CITY'S Finance Department is unable to provide t he informat ion called for in paragraph four by the following appropriate dates the AUDITORS are authori zed to provide the personnel at add i tional cost. computed in the same manner as paragraphs five and six of this agreement. but not to exceed the additional maximum fee stated. ITEf\.1 K-Reconciliation of subsidiary ledger aging of accoun~s receivable. and analysis be~ween funds. J-Trial balances of all funds ~o be audited. A ~hrou gh I -Drafting of the financial statements. Typing and reproduction of the audit report. CC»-1PLETION DATE BY CITY January 15. 1972 January 25. 1972 March 1. 1.972 March 20. 1.972 $ $ s s ~1AXI~~1 FEE 700.00 350.00 500.00 300.00 10. AUDITORS agree further that they will comply with the provisions of a letter dated October 4. 1971. £rom their firm to Stephen A . Lyon. Di r ector of Finance. providing further details of the conduct of the audit . 11 . It is understood that no statement herein should permit the AUDITORS to omit to do any act required by reasonable and customary care in making the audit. - 4 - • • • T 32X • • IN WI~~SS WHEREOF. ~he parties herein have set their hands and sea1s thi.s / _ _,;-day of C,nv • 197 _L__. Attest: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. A Municipa1 Corporation VAN SCHOONEVELD. SHEPHERD AND CO. - s - • • T 32X • • • • ......~~-=-rc fAr.:: n-::u.~ c AG R E E.'t.E.'"T B E Th'EE;\; ~1-HE CIT Y O F ~~GL E "!·:oo~ O COLORADO A.'-=0 V fu~ S C I IOO>:E VELD . S ifEPHERD A.'\;0 CO. IT'S IN OE P E~DE~1 AU D I T O R f.iJJV 1 7; ·11-tiS A G RE.EMEl'-.1. ma de and e nt e red into by and b e t 'h•e cn Lhe City of Englek•ood. Colora do. a municipa l corpora tion. hereina fter called the CI TY and V a n Schoone"·e1d . Shepherd. and Co.,. hereinafter called INOEPEN DE~T AUD ITORS. witnesseth that : 1. For and i~ consid e ration of the mutual covenants herein Contained. the INDEPEND~1 AUDITORS agree that they wil1 make an examination of the balance sheets. revenue. expenditure and budget com parison statem ents and rc1ated income. fund bal a nce and retained earnings stat~ents of the funds of the CITY inc1uding the Firemen•s Pension Fund. Police Pension Fund and Employees Pension Fund f or ~he calendar year ending December 31. 1971 . Audi~ cos~ for the above men ~io ned pension funds mus~ be sub- m itted indiv i~ua lly for each fund . and separate from t he cost of the audit of all other CITY fu nds. It is agreed that the CITY will pay the AUDITORS in February of 1972 for 90~ of the work ~h a t has been completed up through January of that year. and the balance ~·hen the audit is comp leted. 3. It is agreed that the exam Lnation wi ll be made in accordance with ~he genera lly accep ted auditing standards . Inso f a r as cons idere d app licable by the INDEP E XD5'J AUD ITORS . the auditing procedures will follow those prescribed in Governmental Accounting Auditing and Financial ReportinE . a publication by th e National Committee on Gov ernmental Accountin&. Copyright 1968 (Pages 131-147). It is agreed that the scope of the • • • r 32 x [ - - audit sha ll be t ha t o£ a general audi t as prescribed by th e above r c£erencc page 1 2 7 . 4. Th e examin a t ion sha ll not includ e the prepar a tion of the follo"'"•ing for a ny and a ll funds: A. C ombi ned b a lance sheets. B. Bal a nce she e ts. C. Cu s tody of funds and security for deposits. D . Bond e d ind e btedn es s E. Analys is of changes in fund balance or retained earnings. F. Rev e nue . expenditures and budget compa risons. G. Statement of revenue and expense . H. Budget summary. I. Schedules supporting the above financial statements. J. Trial balances of all funds to be audited. K. Reconciliation and provision of detailed tape of subsidiary ledgers. aging of accounts receivable. and analysis between 1~nds. It is agreed tha~ the CITY is responsible for the typing and reproduction of ~he desired number of copies of the audit report. 5. The CITY agrees to submit to the INDEP~~DENT AUDITORS the exhibits. statements and schedules suCject to the examination as they are comp1eted and ~ill endeavor to have ~h ec all submitted by not later than February 15. 1972. and the INDEPENDE~J AUDITORS ag~ee to exert every effort toward completing ~he audit at the earliest possible date there after and in no event more than approxima~ely 45 days after the date of ~he last exhibit . statement and/or schedule is subm it~ed ~o them. 6. The CITY agrees ~o pay the INDEPENDE~J AUDITORS on a per hour rate as follo"'"•s: -2 - • J ' I -- • • T it::lc-of Accoun 't.o.n t P a r tner Senior A ccountant S enior Assis t ant J unior A ssist a nt Sec re ~ar i a l R :J.~e P e r l!ou r $ 3 0 .00 s 2 ..;.oo $ 18.00 $ 12.00 $ 6.00 7. It is unde r s tood tha t the AUDITORS represent themselves as s. ~e ll q ua l i f i ed in municipal accounting., and fu~her th ~t they agree to e xercise due care and diligence and to discharge their professional services specified as efficiently as possible. The AUDITORS intent """ill be to keep the aggregate fee as low as possible . con~ensurate ~ith the services -actually pcrformeC., but not more than $12.,050.00. The AU DITORS should consider in their total fee ., that they must appear before the Council to present their report upon its comp l etion . In addition., it is unders~ood that th e AUDITORS .will. provide a '"Glanagement letter'" with "their evaluation of accounting procedures ""'hich may be improved by the City Administration . Should the AUDITORS encounter a situation during the course of the audit that could not be anticipated a"t. the time of this agreement., and should this situation., in the AUDITORS• opinion., require them to make a much more detailed examinat~on than they had origjnally anticipated in order to satisfy them selves as to the reasonabl.eness of the representations made in the financia1 statements. and thercforc "increase the cost of this audit over and above tho amount stated in this agreer.lent.. then the AUDITORS agree to submit to the C ounc·i 1 Auditing Comm ittee., in ""·ritinr: .. the problems they have encoun"t:ercd. The AUDITORS writing should be as dctail.cd as necess a r y to explain the probl e m nnd must include thci r rccor...r.lCt'h.l c ticn .::.s to 'Chc course th::t~ should I I j I l ~~ I 1, jl • • \ I :r T 32X • • • • be follo~cd in order to com~lete the audi~ in 3 business - l ike manner . The AU D ITORS' r eco~enGations cusL also incluee the ir e stimated additiona l co s t. computed in the s ame manner as paragraphs five and six of this agreemen t. 9. It is understood that the City's ability to provide the items e numerated in paragraph four are dependent upon the avail- ability of personnel in the CITY'S Finance Department. In th e event the CITY'S Finance Department is un able to provide the info1~a tion called for in p aragraph four by the . follo,..·ing appropriate dates t-he AUDITORS are a _uthorized to provide the personnel at additional c ost . compuLed in t he same manner as paragraphs five and six of this agreement. but not to exceed the additional maximum fee stated. ITEr>-1 K-Reconciliation of subsidiary ledger aging of accounts receivabl e . and analysis between funds. J-Trial balances of all funds to be audited. A through I -Drafting o f the financial statements . Typing and reproduction of ~h e audit r ~port. C0~1PLETION DATE BY CITY January IS. 1972 J anuary 25. 1972 March 1. 1972 ~1a:rch 20. 1972 s s $ $ 700.00 350.00 500.00 300 .00 10. AUDITORS agree further that they will comp ly with the provisions of a letter dated October 4. 1971. trom their firm to Stephen A. Lyon. Director of Finance. providing £urther details of the conduct of the audit. 11. It i s understood t hat no statement herein should permit the AUDITORS to o m it to do any act required by r easonable and ~ustomary care in making the audit. -4 - • • • T 32xl • • • • I~ \\.ITNESS \•,'HEREOF . Lhe parLics herein have seL t::he ir hands and sca1 s this /:;1-d ay of b ~~ J 197_<" ___ _ Attest::: .,_ ... ~-- CITY OF ENG L E\·:ooo ,. COLORADO,. A Municipal Corporat:ion VAN SCHOONEVELD,. S HEPHERD ~"'0 CO • -s - \ ! ~ • • T 32X • • • 0 - VAN SCHOONEVELD. H EIDER AND SHEPHERD CIEFlTII"IeD PUBLIC ACCOU .... TANTS .,. ... o ... 0"'"--... ~-~c:~ OIL1>4"C ... C.O .. ~•...O 8 0'0,. ---.~ •.... c ooc:•. c. P ...... o•vc .:: -· ... ..:.u:..c.•. c .~-..... .. c,c:• c . •·--· c . •· .-. •o~-o o...ro•.,. .......... c: ..... •· :::: .. •.; -~~::~~~:::. -;;_ ...... . ....... c ... o . -... o ................ c . .,_ •· ....... -ca --_ ... ,.,..::..e ..... •· Stephen A-Lyon Director of Finance C i ty of Eng1ewood 3400 South Elati Street Englewood. Colorado 80110 Oct:.ober 4 • 1.971 •OO co-<r o.,_C: .. , ........ .,.,,c;.,,.,.._ a •••" •-0'"-D<hG- c-C.-c:-oc:>O. C.O'"-o-•00 •o••O ,._____ ,. ... -~-· c rry c~G ':;..J c r A C ~ f:?~cu~ 1 7 Dear Nr. Lyon : At your request. we subm~t for your cons ~d eracion the fo11ow1ng p r oposal. f or aud~ting serv~ces for the City of Engl.evood for the year ending De c enber 31. 19 71. STAFFI~G BY OUR FIRM We wi l l assign as t he senior accountant on the engagement a certified public accountant wi th not less thari fi ve years of auditing experLence-The senior ~11 be experienced in the audit o f governmental enterprises and will be fami.l.i.ar wi.th those laws of a fi.nanci.al. nac.ure thac pertai.._n co al.l sub - divisions withi.n the State of Col.orado. The partner i.n our firm pro~di.ng o veral.l. supe rvi..si.on o( the enga getnent: has experience i.n the audi.ti.ng of Col.orado muni.ci..pal.i.t:i.es. i.n addi.ti.on to the Ci.t:y of Engl.e~ood. ~th popul.at:i.ons i.n excess of 1.0.000 people. Ass~scanes assLgned e o the engage ment w~ll have co1 1ege degrees w~ch suff~c~ent accounc~ng credit& to qua11fy t o take the C.P.A. examLnacLon Ln the State of Colorado . AL~IT ~XAGEME~~ LETTER · Ye wi ll s u bm~t to the C ity CouncLl a letter detailing areas of financial adminLs tratLon and/or areas of noncompliance wi~h state law or city charter pro~si ons which we believe should be brought to their attention. To the extent ?ossible. th~s letter shall also recommend correctLve actions to be taken . Prior co submiss~on of the letter co the C~ty Counc~l. we will pro~de the C i ty administra tion with a draft "of the letter in order tha t t hey ~ay be prepared to respond cO quest~ons posed by the City C ouncil. CO~DUCT OF THE A UDIT We be1ieve c hat the audit can be performed m ost efficiently by perforoing interim work in Novem ber and December-This would enab1e us co foresee and possibly correct accounting prob1e~s p~or co the close of the year. to per£Qr= C0L.OAA00 S O CieTY or CEATIInEO ~UBUC AC.COUNT ..... NT·s , • • • • • • 0 - . .:2 - a.u..Ji.t tests o( cxpc-nUiLllr<"s m:hlc-by t he Ci.ty duri.n g the Li r s c ten monthl'i of t:hc-ye-ar, .:.n.J to cxpedit:.c the-del ivcry oL t:.he audit repo • t i n a c i.mcl.y Ln shi on. Ouri.ng chis period y w e c.:~n als o prepare: or r cvi.se audi.t:. p r ogr ams to be pcr Lormc:d afc~r December 31, review internal contro l and procedures of chc: Cicy and pro Corma certain workin!i pape r an;:~lyscs . This i.nt:.crim work w oul.d be c ">nductcd wi.c houc c ausing tl,c ccssac ion oC any oC chc C i cy"s accouncing acti.viti.es, or even i mpair them co any si.gni.r i c.ont extent . E ve-ry efCort:. 'Wil l be made by our st:.ai"f t o conduct: this 'Wo rk without: i.ncerCc:ring w "'i.th the normal work flow i.n t:hc: C i.ty "s finance deparone nc. AOJUSTitENTS In t:hc ev~nt that: we: believe that: t:h~ C it:y 's rc:cords requ ~re adjuscrnen t ~n o r der co present: £airly the: CL nancial posi tion or resulcs of O?erac ~ons of che C it:y of Englewood~ w e: w Lll provide: recommended adjusting journal e nt:r Les , w hi c h shall include c xplanat:i ons for the adjusonencs. Furthe r. we ~ill provide: to che C~t:y admi nist:rac~on documentation from our work ing papers as co the need Eor such adjuscments. We w~ll not: prov1de closing ent:r1es fo r t:he City unless requc s LeU co do so. REPORTS In t:he e vent: chat we prepare chc: f~na nc £al report in our off~ce. we will ?rovid e 7 0 copies of t l~ report. 20 addicional COP.ies for t he Bus Fund. and sc.ac.emencs co the Co l orado Governor's Counc£1 on Crime Control. CO:-n>LE":'I .-DATE If w e are able co perform interim audit: procedures in November and Deceober. we ~o uld ancicipace d e li.vc:ry of the audit: reporcs no later chan March 31. 1972 . In t:he event: circumstances would require revision of c h is del.i.v ery date. would not:ify t:he management: of t:he C ity as soon as practicable as co che problems requiring any extension of t:.ime co deli.ve~ the report:s. We will mak~ e v ~ry effo rt to keep the fee £or c he audi.c ac che mi.ni.Qum amoun t: c onsi.sccnc ~i.th che exercise of due care and dil.i.gence i.n c h e per - fonnan c:e of c h e engagement:. Further c o che ex.tenc chey are avai.l.abl.e co us. ~e will uc "li.ze che pe rsonnel. o f che C ity for rouci.ne or clerical. cypes of work connecced wi.ch c he auUi.c. To che excenc we detenni.ne c har: scati.sci.cal mechods w ill lessen t:.he ci.me and cost: of the audit. we --t.l.l. ut:.ili.ze che.se methods in the conduct of our work • We wilL e ncer inco a cont:ract similar co che one shown as Concract:. A in the booklet: entitled Sclect L on of a Municipal Audi.cor published by the Colorado :"iuni.ci.pal L eaguc. This contract sees forch hourly races and a maxi.muzn fee. The hourlY rates would be as follows: Partner .$30.00 hr . Senior Accounc.anr: .$24.00 hr. Senior Assi.sr:anc -$18.00 hr. Juni.or Assi.sc.anc .$12.00 hr. Secrecari.al -$ 6.00 hr. • \ ! ~ • T 32X • [ • • • • 0 - The n1.:~ximum (c-c Cor Lhc c-ng::Jgcmcne w cna lcl h<-~ ~·3 .,200. This rn.axirnum. fcc c an be rcduc..co.:.l c o ns id ... ~r ... ahly b y t:he Ci.t:y i.L t:hc C i cy"s pcrsonnc pcrfornls the followin g Cunc ci. ... ,n s: (1). Dra(c.i..n& o( the Cinancial s t .at:cmcnL s , including corn bi.n~d balance shc-ccs . balance shcc-Ls. revenue, cxpcndi.curc s and budgcc c.orn~ari son s, an.::a ly.scs o£ ch anges in fund ba1.n u·cs and supplementary schedules of bonded i.ndcbc.cUncss anc.l cusc.ody o £ Lunds -approximate fee saving $500 .00 (2) Prcp.arac.i.on oC c.ri..al b alancc:!'s. i n t:.hc Corm required by us. o f al.l funds co be audi.tcd -approximate Lee saving -$350.00 (3) Analys -.s oC accounr:s. or schedules su;-o;")orc.i.ng the f"i-nanc i.al. st:.ac:e - menc.s -approximaLe (ce saving -0 co $1,000 .00 -depending extent: c.o w h.ich work i.s pcrLormed (4) Typing and reproduction of" Lhe desired numbe r of copies of the a u dit: report: -apopro x.imac.e fee sa v i.n g -$300.00 . SUPPLE"!':E:"\TAL AND REl'1EDIAL ACCOUNTING WORK In c.h e event i.e i.s necessary,. we wi.ll provide personnel to assist: c.he Ci.c.y 's personnel i.n nccompli.shi.ng the followi-n g accounting (tln Ct:i..on s at c.he hou r ly races sca ced . HO'W'e v:er • t:.hese services "Would no c. be i..ncluded 'W"i. c h in c.h e maximum fee li.mi.c.ati..on . (1) The balancing o f c.h.e ac.count:i..ng records of the various funds o f the c i.ty. (2) Re conciliation of ca sh and i.nve scment:s included i.n central cash to c.he vari..ous deposi.c.ories and a llocat:i..on co c.he apt:tropri.ac.e Ci.t:y funds. (3) The preparation of an additional audi.c report: i.n conformi.cy wi.t:.h C.l"le Un.i£orm C lassi.fi.cac.i.on of Account:& for C.i.t:i.es and Towns. (4) The rcconci.li.ati.on of receivable detail co control a ccounts i.n t h e uci.lity deparcmenc.. (5) The post:i.ng of ori.s inal appropri.at:i.ons made by the City Council and a dd~tions and changes chereco. (6) Ocher accounting work requesc.ed by the C ity administration . We appreciate being considered for the audi.c. engagement f or c.he C ity of Engle"Wood for the calendar year 1971. Xn the e vent you 'W'1sh additional infor- macion or clarifi.cat:Lon ooncern.i.ng t:.hi.s proposal,. pl.ease let:. us know. V e ry truly yours,. LDS:jp • • • r • • • AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGl-EWOOD • C OLORADO AND VAN SCHOONEVELD • HEX.OER AND SHEPHERD. IT'S INDEPENDENT AUDITOR THIS AGREEMENT . made and entered into by and between the City of Eng1ewood . C o1orado. a municipa1 corporation. hereinafter ca11ed the CITY and Va n Schooneve1d. Heider and Shepherd. hereinafter ca11ed INDEPENDENT AUDITORS. ~tneaaeth that: 1. For and in consideration of the mutua1 covena.nts herein contained. the INDEPENDENT AUDITORS agree that they ~11 make an ex~nation of the ba1ance sheets. revenue. expenditure and budget compa.ri..aon atate:t:nenta and re1ated income. fund ba1ance and retained earnings statements o f the funds of the CITY inc1uding the Firemen•s Pension Fund and Po1~ce Pena~on Fund~r t~ ca1endar _year e~~ng~ ~~~~ December 31., 1971. Audit coat of the above JDeOC~oned ~ ~ .. pension funds must be sub~tted ~nd~~dua11y for each fund., and separate from the coat o£ che audit of a11 other CITY funds. 2. Ic is agreed that the CITY ~11 pay the AUDITORS in February of 1972 for 90% of the work that has been comp1eted up through January of c.hac year., and the ba1ance ~en the audit is comp1eted. 3. Ic is agreed that the examinacion ~11 be made in accordance with genera11y accepted _ auditing standarda • Insofar as considered app1icab1e by the INDEPENDENT AUDITORS., the auditing procedures ~11 fo11ow those prescribed in Governmenta1 Accounting Auditing and Financia1 Reporting. a pub1~cation by che Nationa1 Commdctee on Governmenta1 Accounting. Copyright~1968 (Pages 131-147). It: La agreed Chat the acope of the • • - • • • • audit sha~l be that of a general audLt as preacrLbed by the above referenc e page ~27. 4. The exami n at1on~11 not i nc1ude ·che preparation of the followi n g for any and all funds: A. Combined balance sheets B. Balance ahee t s C. Custody o f funds and security for deposits D . Bonded indebtedness E. Analysi s of cha~ges in fund balance or retained earnings F. Revenue. expenditu~s and budget comparisons G. Statement of revenue and expense H. Budget summary I. Schedules supporting the above financial statements J. Trial balances of all funds to be audited - K. Reconciliation and provision of detailed tape of subsidiary ledgers. aging o f accounts rece ivable. and analysis ~etween funds It ~s agreed that the CITY ~-reapons~b1e for the typing and reproduct~on of the dea~red number of eop~ea o£ the audit report. 5. The CITY agrees eo subm~t to the INDEPENDENT AUDITORS the exh~bies, statements and achedu1eS•ubject to the examination as th ey are comp1eted and ~11 endeavor to have them a11 submi tted by not 1ater than February 15, 1972, and the INDEPENDENT AUDITORS agree to exert every effort. toward comp1et~ng the audit at. t.he ear1~est posaib1e date thereafter and in event more than ~pproxi~tely 45 daya after the date of the 1aat exhibit. statement and/or schedu1e is submitted to them. 6. The CITY agrees to pay the 1HDEPBNDENT AUDXTORS on • per bou~ rate •• fo11owa: (2) II • • 1'32 - - - Ti t le of Accountant P a rtner Senior Accountant Seni o r Assistant Junior Assistant Secre tarial - R.a c:.e Per Hour $30.00 $24.00 $18.00 $12.00 $ 6.00 7. It La understood that th e AUDITORS represent themselves well qualified in munic ipal accounting. and further that they agree co exerc ise due care and diligence and to discharge t l1ei.r professional servi.ces spec i.fi.ed as effi.ci.ent:ly aa possible. The A UDITORS intent w i.ll be to keep the aggregate fee as l~w as possible. commensurate with the se~ces actually perfo~ed. but not more than $12,050.00. The AUDITORS should consider i.n their total fee. that they appea r before the Council to present their report upon its completion. In addition, ~t ~s under•tood that che A UDITORS "W i.11 prov~de a •tm.anagement 1eccer•• w-ith tbei..r eva1- uac~on of accounting procedures whi..ch may be Lmproved by the Ci..ty Adm.i.ni.stration. 8. Should the AUDITORS encouncer a si..tuati..on durLng the cour•e of the audi.t that: could not be anti..ci.pac:ed at the time of r thi.s ag reement, and shou1d thi..s si.tuac:i.on, i.nthe AUDITORS opi.ni.on. require them to ~ke a much more detai.1ed exam- ination than they bad ori.ginally anticipated i.n order co sat i sfy the~sel ve s to the rea sonableness of the repre- sentations made in the financia1 statments. and therefore increase the cost of thi.s audi..t over and above the amount stated in this agreement. then the AUDITORS ~gree to aubmi.t to the Counci1 Audi.ting C~ttee. in writi.ng, the probl~• they have encountered. The AUDITORS wr"i..ti.ng ahou1d be detailed aa necessary to exp1a~n the prob1~ and muat include thei.r recommendati.on •• to the courae that ehould (3) i I j - 1 I -- • • • be follo-ed in order co complete the aud~t in a bua~neaa- l~ke ~anner. The AUDITORS recommendat~one must also include ehe~r est~mated add~tional coat. computed in the paragraphs fi.ve a n d si.x o f thi.a. agreem e nc. • . 9 . It i.s underst:ood chat ehe Ci.e y's abi.li.ty t o prov ·i.d e che i.c.em a enumerated i.n paragraph fou r are depende n t u pon the a v ail - abi.li.c.y of pers -J nnel i.n the CITY'S financ e depa r tmen t. In the event ehe CITY'S finance department i.s u n able to p r o ~d e the information called for in p aragraph f ou r by t h e y follo·W"i.ng appropri.ate da t es c.he Au.D X TOit:S a re a uthori.z.ed prov i d e the personnel at add i t i ona l cost . computed in the same manner as paragraphs fi ve a n d si x o f t h is agreement . b u t not t o e xceed the additi onal max i.mum fee stated. I cern K -Reconcil1iation o f subsi..d i.a r y ledgert; agi.ng o f accounts receivable. and analysis between f u n ds. J -Trial bala nc es of a 11 funds to be a ud i t e d A th rough I -Draf t i n g of the fi n anc ial statements T y p i n g a nd reproduction o f the a ud i t repo r t Comp1 e t i.on Dace ')(" Maxi..IDUZD b y C1.ty . Fee J anua ry 1 5. 1 972 $700.00 Janua ry 25 . 1 972 $350.00 March 1 . 1972 $500.00 H.arch 20. 1972 $300.00 1 0 . A UDITORS ogree fur t he r t ha t t hey ~1 1 c omp1y wi th the p r o vLa iona of a letter dated Octo b e r 4 . 19 7 1. f rom thei r f irm to Stephe~ A. Lyon. Directo r of Fi.nance •• provi.d i.ng further detai.1 a o f the conduct of the aud i.t • 1 1. It i.e u nd e rstood that no statement herei.n aho uld pe~t the AUDI TORS to omit to do any act required by reaao nable aad cuatc:xna ry care .1.n ma.ki.ng the audit . (4) • • r 32x • IN WXTNESS WHEREOF • che pa rti.ea he: rei.n have set chei.r hands and seal.s t::hi.s -------------day of 197 ______ _ CITY OF ENGL:E.-.:!'OOD COLORADO. a ~un1.c1.pa1 corporation By-------------------------------- Atcest : VAN SCHOONEVELD. HEIDER AND SHEPHERD By ------------ap~a~r~cn~e~r~------------- • • (5) I~ I- I II • • r 32x [ • • • DRVC:II: ........ c .. ~,a;A 0 C:. ~-A . • VAN SCHOONEVELD. HEIDER AND SHEPHERD CE RTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS o:a•o LOG"'-.. S.o•c..;~ o l:•4vl: .... C:OLOAADC) •O:rO ]o _,.__..._,,...,... -... "'"""' sc: .... oc:,.. .. c..,.c:Lo. c: .......... .. .,,1: .. c ..... ow ..... c .--.... . -o........_ ... o L. roA..--...._...,_ c: .... ""· ::: ... 5.;~~=~:~~;,.:-. ~--... _ ....__ O<.A.-C::N o . oc..._o ........ _..._us. c: • .,._ "'-· .......... cs ---··ooTo::. c. ......... Mr. Stan Di.a1 City Manager Ci.t:y of Englewood Eng1cwood. C olorado Dear Mr. Di.al: October 12. 1971 80110 •oo c:oNnh c: ... ,..._._ .,.,..,,g,,_....._ ............. .._o, ... co I:N~L..C-c>o00 COLOA•OO •0110 cn-v c~G ~~.c r Eo _L 1 U '\..'TENT .1 I I CI~O~;;'E_-cL: F1 LE . -· • 000. CO LO. Enclosed i.s the rough draft of the proposed agreement: berween t he C ity of Englewood and our £i.rm £or the audi.t of the city's records for the year o f 197 1. Very truly yours. ~Lr/A's-~7~7 S HEPHE-RD Shepherd. C.P.A. LDS:jp Enc1osures A~IEAJCAN INSTITUT I!!: Or C!!!:_ATI,-IED PUOLfC 4CCOUNTANT$ • COLOR4DO SOCIETY Or Clf:RTiriED PUOLIC A CCOUNTA-NTS • • I' 32 X • • • ACREEZ..J E ~T BE"'"\-.tEEN THE CITY OF ENGLE\..:000 ,. COLORADO Al'.'"D VJ\.N SCIIOO~EVELD,. HEIDER AND S.U EPIIERD ,. IT'S INDEPENDENT AUDITOR TiliS AG REE~lliNT ,. ~de and entered into by a n d bet-een ~he City of Eng1ewood. Co1orado,. a municipa 1 corporation,. hereina£te r ca11ed cbe C ITY and Van Schoon eve 1d,. Heider and Shepherd,. h e rei._naft:e r ca11e d INDEPEI'.'DENT A UDITORS ,. wi.t:n.esset:h that:: 1.. For· and i.n consi-deration of t:he rrtUt:ua 1 covenan ts herein contained,. the IND EP~~ENT AUDI T ORS agree that they w111 make an examin ation of the ba1ance sheets,. revenue,. expenditure and budget: compar ison statements and re1ated income ,. fund ba1ance a n d r et:a1ned earn~ngs statements of the funds of the CITY ~nc1ud~ng the F~remcn•s Pens~on Fund and Po1ice Pension Fund~r th~ ca1endar year e~i· ng~ ~ • ~~vz.c-? - December 31~ 1971. Audit cost of the above mentioned ~~~~---; pension funds must be submitted ind~vidua11y for each fund~ and separate from the cost of dhe audit of a11 other CITY funds . 2. It is agreed that the CITY w111 .pay the AUDITORS in February of 1 972 f~r 90% of the w ork that has been comp1eted up through January of that year~ and the ba1a.nce wh en t:he audit is comp 1 eted . 3 . It: is .agreed chat: the exam.i.nati.on wi.11 be mad e i._n a cco rda nce ~~th genera11y accepted . auditing standards • Inso£ar a s conside red app1icab1e by the INDEPENDENT AUDITO RS ~ the auditing procedures wi11 fo 11ow .those prcscr:ibcd i.n Governmc nca1 Accounting A u dici.ng and Financia1 Reporting~ a pub1ication by the Nationa 1 Commit tee on Govcra,mc nta1 Accounting., Copyright' 1968 (Pages 131-147). It is agreed tlta.t the scope of t:h~ i - i I • • • nud~L sl,all be th~t o£ ~ general audit as prcscrLbcd by the above re(ercnce page 127. 4. The i.nclude the pr ep~ ration oL the followLng (o~ any and all Lunds: A. C ombi.ned balance sheets B. Balance gheecs C. Custody o£ funds and security for deposits D. Bonded i.ndebtedness E. Analysis o£ cha'~ges i.n £und balance or retained earnings F-Revenue. expenditures and budget cOmparisons G. Stateme nt of revenue and expense H. Budget summary I. Schedules supporting the above financial statements J. TrLal balances o£ all £unds to be audited K. ReconcLliacion and prov~sion of detaLled cape of subsidiary ledgers. agi.ng of accounts receivable. and analysis berween funds It i.s agreed that the CITY i s responsible for the cypi.ng •and r eproduction of the desired number of copies of the audit report. 5. The CITY agrees to submit to the INDEPEh~ENT AUDITORS the exh~bi.ts. statements and scheduleSsubject to the examination as they are completed and will endeavor to have them all submitted by not later than February 15. 1972. and the INDEPENDENT AUDITORS agree to exert every effort coward c omp leting the audit at t::he earliest possible date • therea£ter and in event more t~an approximately 45 days after the date of the last: exhi.bi.t. statement and/or schedu1c i.s submitted to them . • 6. The CITY agrees to pay the INDEPEN'DENT AUDITORS on a per hour rate .as foll.ows: (2) • I I I • • r 32x • • • TiLl~ of Acc o unLant Partner Senio r Acc ountnnc Senior Assistant: Junior Assistant Sccret:ari.al • Rat e Per Hour $30.00 $24.00 $18.00 $12.00 $ 6 .00 7. It: is under stood that: the AUDITORS represent themselves ~ell qualiCicd in municipal accounting. and further chat: they agree to exercise due care and di.llecnce and to discharge their proCessional services specified as e£ficient:ly as p ossible . The AUDITORS i.nt:ent: will be co. keep t:he aggregat:e fee as l~w as possible. c omme nsurate with the services actually performed . but not: more than $12.050 .00 . The AUD ITORS should consider in c.hei.r c.ocal fee. t:hnt: they must appear be£ore the Council co present their report upon its completion. In addition. i.e is understood that the AUDITORS wi11 provide a '"management letter•• """ith their eval- uatioo o£ accounting procedures which may be improved by the Ci.ty Admini.stration. 8. Should the AUDITORS encounter a si.tuati.on dur1ng the course -of the audit that could not be anticipated at the time of r this agreement. and should this situation. inthe AUDITORS opinion. require them to make a much more detai1ed exam- inaci.on than they had ori.gi.oal1y anticipated in order co sati.sCy thcmse1vcs to the reasonableness of the repre- sentati.ons made in the fi.nanci.a1 stat:ment:s. and chereforc increase the cost of this audit over and above t he amount stated i.n this agreement. then the AUDITORS agree to submi.t to the Council Auditing C o~nittce. i.o writing. the problems they have encountered . The AUDITORS wri.t:i.ng should be dcLai.l cd a3 nece ssary to exp1ain the problem and must include t:hci.r recommcndaLi.on as to chc c ourse t;hat should (3) • • • r 32xl - - - - be followed ~n order co complete Lh e a u d~c ~n a busLness - like tnanner. Tl11c AUDITORS rccommcndnci.ons m u se also i..ncludc tl1cir estim~Lcd additional cost . computed in the same mDnnc r p aragraphs Ci.ve and six oC thi.s . agreement • . 9. It is understood that the C i.ty 's abi.li cy to provide t he items enumcrnced i.n parDgraph four are dependent upon the avail- ability o£ pers,nnel i.n th e CITY'S fi.nance deparonenc. In the-event: t:he CXTY"S fi.nance depart:n~enc is unable co provide the i.nConnation c alled Cor in paragraph £ou r by the j-'\ ColloW"ing appropriate d a te s c.h e AuDITORS are authorized co pr ov ~d e the p e r sonn e l at additional cos t. com?uted in the same manner as paragraphs fiv e and six of chis agre eme nc.. but n oc. to exceed the additional maxUnum fee seated. K - Item R e c oncil l ~ation o£ subsidiary ledger~ a gi ng oC accou nts receivab le. and analysi.B berween funds. ~ -Tr~a1 ba1ances of a11 funds co be audited A through I -Drafting of the financial stace ~ents Typi.n g and reproducc.i.on o .f the audi.t repo r t: C ompletion Dace~ b y Ci.c.y January 15. 1972 January 25. 1972 March 1. 1972 March 20. 1972 M aximum Fee $700.00 $350.00 $500.00 $300 .00 10. AUDI TORS agree further that they will comply with c.h e provi.si.ons of a letter dated October 4. 1971. from their finn co Steph c~ A. Lyon . D~rector of F~nance,.prov~di.ng further deta~ls of th e conduct of t:he audLt. 11. It: ~s und ers tood chat no statement: h erei.n shou1d pc~c the A UDXTORS t:o omit to do any ace required by rea S onable and cu stom~ry care in making t:he audit. (4) -- 1'32X [ • I N \o..'ITNESS \..'HEREOF • t he p a rc i..cs he rei..n ha v e set .t:hei.. r hand s a n d seals t hi..s -------d ay o f 197 ___ • C ITY O F E N G L EWOOD COLORADO~ a mun~ci..p a 1 c o rp o r a ti..o n By·-------------------- A t:t:.es t : V AN SCHOONEVELD,. HEIDER A~'"D S HEPH ERD By P a r t.oer • • (5) • . , 1- j - I • • r 32x c - AGRf::Er-fr.:NT BET\-.'EE~ Tli E CITY OF Er-:GLEWOOD , COLORADO Af\."D VAN SCIIOONEVELD ., HEIDER A ND SH EPliElt.D . IT'S IND EPENDENT AUDI T OR 1~IS AGREE~lli NT ., made and entered into by and bec-een the City of Eng 1 e -ood, Co1orado , a municipa1 corporation., hereinafter ca11cd the C ITY and Van Schooncve1d~ Hci.der and Shepherd., hereinafter ca11ed IND EPE~~ENT AUDITORS, ~tncss et h that: 1. For and in con s ideration of the mutua1 covenants herein contained, the IND EPENDENT AUDITORS agree that they ~11 make an examination of the ba1ance sheets , revenue, expenditure and budget comparison statements and r e1ated income , fund ba1ance a n d re tained earnings statements o f the funds o f the CITY inc1uding the Firemen 's Pen sion Fund and Po1i.ce Pension Fund~r t:..h: ca1c.ndar year e~i..ng · _/.. # ----o -.. ~-p-- D ecember 31~ 1971. Audit cost of the above menti o ned ,.-;..-~-~--~# pension funds must be submitted i.nd~vidua11y for each fund~ and separate f rom the cost of the audit o£ a11 other C ITY funds . 2. It is agreed that the C ITY wi11 pay the AUD ITORS in February o f 1972 f~r 907. o f the work chat has been comp 1eted up through January of that year~ and the ba1ance when the audit is comp1eted. 3. It is agreed thac the examination wi.11 be made i.n accordanc e with gencra11y accepted auditing standards . -InsoLar as considered app1icab1e by the INDEPENDENT AUDITORS . the auditing procedures wi11 fo11ow tho se pre scr ibed in Governmenta1 Accounting Auditing and -Fi.nanci.a1 Reporting ,. a pub1i.cation by the Nati.ona1 --Committee on Govc.rnmcnta1 Accounting,. Copyright:"' 1968 {Pages 131-1.47 ). It is agreed th a t the s cope of the -• I' • • • • a udi L sl~nll be ~ha L o£ a g~n e r al a••d~c as pres cribe d by L hc above r cCeren c e p age 127. 4. Th e exomi.n a t.ion sah1 1 n o t ~ncludc the prep a r a ~ion of the fol.l o\oTi.ng (or any and all fund s : A. C ombi n e d ba l an c e s heets B. B a l ance g h ec ~s C. Cu s c ody o£ funds and security for depos1ts D-B ond ed ~nd ~b~edn ess E-An a ly s i.s of ,,. charges 1n fund balance or retained F -Rev e nu e . expe nditures. and budget comparisons c. Scat.emc nt: of revenue and expense H . Budget s umma ry earnings I. Schedule s supporting che above financial statements J. Tr~al balances o£ all funds co be aud~ced K -Reconciliation and prov~s~on of detailed cape of subsidiary ledgers. aging of accounts r eceivable. and analysis be~een funds It is agreed chat the CI TY is respons~ble for the typing and reproduction of the dcs~red number of copies of the audit report. 5-The CITY agrees co submit to the INDEPENDENT AUDITORS the o~hi.bi.ts. statements and scheduleSsubject to th e examination as they are completed and w111 endeavor c o have t hem all submitted by not later chon February 15. 1972.· and the INDEPENDENT AUDITORS agree to exert every effort toward c om pleting th e audit at che earliest possible dace thcrea£ter and ~n event more than approximately 45 days aLter the date of the 1ast exh~bit. statement and/or schedule i.s submitted to them • 6. The CITY agrees to pay the INDEPENDENT AUDITORS on a per hour rate as follows: (2) 1- i I • • - • • • TiLl e oC A ccounLan c Par c n c r Sen~or Acc o unL an t:. Se n ior A s s istan t:. J u n ior A ss is t a nt S e c recari.al • R a t e-Per Ho u r $30.00 $24.00 $18.00 $12.00 $ 6.00 7. I t:. is und ersLood t:.h a t t he A UDITORS re p rese nt:. themse lves w e ll q uali£Lcd i n mun ici pa l a c coun c ing. and furc he r c hat c hey agree t o exerc ise du e c a r e and d i l ige nc e and c o di s c h arge t:.l,c ir p ro f essional s e rv i c e s s pec i fied as e£ficient:.ly a s pos si.b l e . The AUDITORS i n t:.e n t: w i.l.l be co ke e p the ag_gregac.e Lee as l~w as po ssibl e . c omme n s urate wiLh the services actually perfo~e d. b u t n o L mo r e t ha n $12.050.00. The A UDI TORS s hou ld con s ider in cheir t:.ot:.al fee. thac they ~usc appear before t:he Council to present their reporc upon ics completion. In addition. ~t is understood th at the AUDITORS W'i.11 pr?vi...de a ••management letter" W'ith their ~val- uati.on o£ accounting procedures W'hich may be improved by ehe Ci.ty Administration. 8 . Should th e AUDITORS encount er a situation during the course ·of the audit that: could n o t: be anticipated a t the ti.me of r t:hi.s agreement~ and should this si.t:uati.on~ i.nthe AUDITORS opi.ni.on~ require them to mak e a much more detailed exam- inat:.ion than they had originally anticipaced in order t:.o s a t isfy c hemse 1ves to th e reasonablenes s of the repre- s e n t at~on s mad e in the fin a ncial stat: nt:s. and therefore incre a se the cost of this oudi.t: over and above the am?unt: seate d in this agreement. then the AUDITORS agre"e to submit to the Council Auditing CommLttee~ i.n writing. the problems they have encountered . The AUDITORS writing should be d etailed a s necessary t o explain the problem and must include the-ir recomme nd a tion as to the cou rse th LJt should (3) • • T 32 X - - - - - be followed ~n order ~o c omp lece the aud~t ~n a bus~ness - li.ke manner . The AUDITO RS rcc ommenda t:.i.on s must also i.nclude thci. r es t:~mac.cd ad di. L~onal cos a:, comput:cd in c he parag raphs Li.ve and si.x of thi.s_ agreement • . 9. 1c i s understood that the City's abLl~ty to provi.de the i.cems enumerated i.n p a ragraph four are dependent up o n t:he avail - abi.l i.ty of p ers ,nne l i.n th e CITY'S fi.nance departme nt. In the event th e CITY 'S Ci.nance d e partment i.s unable to provi.de th e i.nformat:~on called for ~n paragraph four by the ~ following appropri..ate dates the A ~ITORS are authori.zed provide the personnel at addi.t~onal cost, c omputed i.n the same manner as paragraphs fi.ve and si.x of t:.hi.s agreement, but not to exceed the addi.ti.onal maxi.~um fee stated. } K - Item Reconci.l\i.ati.on of subsi.di.ary ledger~ agi.ng of acco unts receivable, and analysi.s be~een funds. J -Tri.al balances of all funds to be audi.ted A through I -Drafti.ng of the fi.nanci.al statements Typing and reproduct~on o_f t:he audi. t repo r t Completion Dace X Maxi.mum b y Ci..t:.y Fee January 15, 1972 $700 .oo. J anuary 25, 1972 $350.00 March 1, 1972 $500.00 March 20, 1 972 $300.00 10 . AUDITORS agree further that they wi.ll comply wi.th the provisi.ons of a lett:.er dat:.ed October 4, 1971, from thei.r ~i.rm to St:.ephe~ A-Lyon, Di.rector of Fi.nance, .providi.ng further dct:.ai.ls of ~he conduct of the audi.t. 11. It is unders~ood that no statement herei.n should permi.t the AUDI TORS co ami. t to do any act requi. red by reasonable and customary care i.n making -the audi.t. -• , [ • - IN WITNESS WH EREOF . t:h c pa rti.cs he rci.n have set: chei.r hands and sea1s thi.s d ay or: 197 __ _ CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COLORADO,. a municipa1 corporaci.on By·-------------------- Ac.t:e sc: VAN SCllOONEVELD,. HEIDER AND SHEPHERD By Parc.ner ·~ • • t---• • 1- ~ (5) ~~ r-• .. _ -~-~· t\.' 1'32X [ • • • 0 - "1'0: All 1\lcn:abcrs o£ the EnglC"'\IVood City Cotrneil FRO .. J: l\1r. St.a.nl cy H. Di:l.l. City 1'\lnnagcr DATE: C>ct..obcr 29. 1971 SUB-JhCT: J.>HOPOSED LTQUOH LICENSE nENE\.VAL PROCED RE At 'lhc P"l.CCting of Oc.:t.ober 1 8 . 1971. the Council questioned the n ecess ity of havinl; c::tcb liquor or b eer license bolder come bef"ore the Council n.nnu."1..1ly for rencw::t.l of his license. A discussion 'viO:t t.hc Police Cble£ and U 1c Director of Finance indicat.es t...ilat tl1.::: value or this procedure is quc.s.tiun.a.J_.)c and that ''"e could .ach i eve the s:.a..n-tc surveillance o.! tbc;:;c rcnc -..... -als by n.doptin~ ::a. method of selective rc'-"i.e--~-. 1r.: th <.:! Council packet for the n c:-..-t n"lceting ''"c 'vill have (a) a list of r~ . .-- nc,vals orgar.i z.cd by u,c t.ypc of lice nse; (b) a li st of the number or p o Hcc calls at e3c·h. cst::t.blislnnent for the preceding bveh.·c-Jnon.t.l'l p eriod; (c) a D"l.eTnorandum !ro n~ the Police Chicl noting establishn'lcut....'"' 'dlich h::a.vc had tl"l ·a.-<·c or rnore police c:l.lls and any other est.._'"ililishn'lcnts '"h rc b e £c\3ls 11.: ilo1oportant to dra'v t he license t.o tbe at..-te-ntion of t.h e Council; at.d (cl) posRibly a me"J·norandum .fron'l the Director of Finance -n"it:h rcf~rence to sc'\.•crn l of tl"le li cense hold ers . Unless Uirected ollie r,,-ise by tl1e Cit-..{ Councu. ~';e """"'lil proceed ou this b asis of sclect""ive revic'v for renS!'" al of liquor cr bce1· licenses. R espcctfu11y , --~-=--L~. /-J_~___:_-P S TANLEY l-1. ~L City 1'\lana.ge r SJ-TD./ij ~ CC: 1\-lr. Stephen A . Lyon. Dil:"cctor of Finance· • • r 32x • • • • 0 - flA -rE: <>ct.ut_,c ,· 2':!J,. 1~71 SU13.J ECT: AO<..>PTH . .):" OF' CEBTAIN B "ILUI N(O ODES AtL:._acht::.•d is a :.-:c-hc.:~lu.Jc-for the 3dopt.ion of th e fol lo'\.vinl!. lou•~ codt..·s: (1 ) t:nifurn'l Huiltlin~ C•...c...lc . Vol. I -197<.' (2) L'nilorrn lluildtnb Cod'-"• Vol. 2-1970 (Cnito.-n"l :'\lcchanic::Ll <..:(l'(jc) (:J.) niforn'l Plun"lUing Cede. 1~170 (4) Nationa..l EJ<.-..ct.ric Code,. t!l-;t \Vc h:tvt..• contc mp l n t.~d the adoption of t}u .. •s:c-codes for· sonH_· tinu.· and arc especia lly i nt.crcst.L-.:1 in t.:h::tn~in~ (r·o •n th e Denver OuihJing C"OLh .. • t o the t ·niform Buildin}! Code. '\\"c ::u ·c c·ur•·cnt.Jy t.he on l y City in t..h4...· n"letropolit.an orca '\.vi th tl1 c cxeL'pli on of r>enver a n £1 Lakcvvood vvhieh is n o t usinA" th e l 'nifnrnt Buildin~ C"o<h .. •. \ '-" hnvc h.._•<·n •·t..!liahly in- formed th a t: tJ1 c Ruildin~ D<. .. p:trt.nlcnt of L...aJ..;.cvvoc.M..I fll:tn.s to init.i:-tt..c tht · adoptio n of th e Liniforn1 Huildinj:! c ... J(:.ft. .. • in th e very n t..·ar futu.-c. C>t.hcr ei tit..!::. using Lhc l ""nilt•rn1 Buildin,::: Cn<lt..• n u l..s tOc the· 11.lt..•trt•po lit .. an arc:1 arc. anlon,:: o U-.crs . 13ou1dc•-. Grand J unction. C'ol o r·ado Sprin~s . a nU Pueblo. The Dcparbnent of Jtousin{!:" a nd l 'rha n Dcv£:>lopmcnt ha.""i indicat.cd th at t..hc adoption of these codes i s hihrhh.-dt..·sira.blc if "t..' "'rish t o r<...-ccivc approval of our \.Vorh.:"l hlc Progra..nl :IJtplic:.ttion. Bot:h !\1r·. Kells \.V:-eg~onc•· .. Di•·cct.o•· of .Public \.Vo1·ks .. and ::\tr. Jin.., Supin~cr .. Plannin~ Direet..or. have •-cvit .. •·,,c-<.1 th esc codes in clctail and find thcn"'l t o Ut..• s ati s - factory and rcc.:onlnlcnd the i1· adoption. \.Vith the packet [or the Novcn.lb.....••· 1 5 th l""llCCting we ·will include bills fOI"" th e adoption of these codes a nd a n"'lcn'loJ-anUun1 hi~hl i~hting the h n- porta.nt ch::tn(!cS """hic-h these Ct.."-lt.-..:-; "' ou ld c(fcc·t. Copies o f the e udcs """ill be :-evail:tblc a t t.hc sess i o n thi :s :\1ond3y ni"'ht. R cspccUuJiy . __ _________,~ 6 .._s J-I.I2:> ..___,.___-+-p STANLEY 11. 01AL City !\tan3g,~~t· SHD/ii rC': ,, r . t..;;c"'11 --: '''""lf"'t...-n..,..-•r 0 Nov c:..·z .l l ... ·t · 1 ~~. 1 !t7 I Nov crnbc ·r 1 7 . 1 ~}7 1 Nov em b e r 2 1 . 1 97 1 D c ccmh <'l" 6. 1 ~71 D c c~.:..·mbe J ' 8_. 1 971 J nnunry 7 _. 1 972 KW:p d 10 21 '71 • • • • 0 - SC"II Ll ll I J . ) \,_II{ (_ UIJL .,\ UOPT 1 U . J.iill to1 · :-tn <">z -d1n~t11<"--•>~• F11 ·--t (i ,,,c.Jing . ..-\ulho.•r l /,t t._ 1 c •n c 1 J N t.>l J c• c~t Puh1 ic. ll •':11 "i t l g 1ut· nd<~J•Li<.»l l c.•f lll'-' f c.,I Jc..>\.-.iT tg Co<h .·:-: ni l o t·rn Jl u 1ld11\g C'')d•. \.'n l . I 1!.-lU L:111 I ~,._q·m t _;u i 1 ding Cuc..h.·. \:<.•1 . I I 1 !_)70 (L"n iJuJ"III :\.h .. ·'-·h:-.nit ·.t l Cu'-J') l 1 ni t c.:H·m Plu mhi n ~ C'c.,dt.•. l !l ~·o l":"t t i C>ll;t ] 1-~1 (•(_" l )._" i (_ C'c:._..: .. l<.: ) ~)7 l P\IUl i~lt J\.o l.i f...·._~ O l P ub lic_· ll t..tl 'ing Pt 1hl.1<.: lt t.-.:"t l"in :..! un Cot-1'--"s . 0J"<.Jit 1 ,11lC<..-. Utl J-"'.J..n;-t) J" ;.tdin c-:, V ubl i hh Ot-UJ. n:'ln cc.• Or·di11;1nc,_• in Jul1 J ot'l..' ;_t ncJ ...__. J J L 'C.' l.. • • • • 0 - .. No~ember 1 , 1971 I 1 The Honorable Mayor a.nd Council : --- The attached names were solicited from customers or the three businesses listed below . We ask that parking be returned to the south side o£ Girard Avenue. EL RANCHERITO RESTAURANT s {e<3c<__. ....,/ ~<;?..a , e ~~~ /-/ ;:;:r HURLEY RADIO AND TV CB.A.LKE:RSE A.. PA.R.KER HAIRDRESSERS ~-'~~ • • • • WE~ THE UNDERSIGNED. REREBY PETITION THAT PARKING BE ALLOWED 0~ THE SOUTH SIDE OF GIRARD • FROM BROADWAY TO LOGAN~ EXCEPTING THOSE PLACES AS MAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADIN~ AREAS. BUS STOPS. ETC. Name • • • - .E , T :_-: \L:__._;n.-=G-~:.>, H .. ':'t..; Y :I-~ ('__--:t.J . -\,. -~'==? C':. . 'l • LC'• ----(' -.J:: G '<'-• -<. ( 1: r l • l c- ~ J ( -.._.. ( . - --- -• • - W'E • THE UNDERSIGNED~ HEREBY PETITION THAT PA.R.KING BE ALLOWED 0~ THE SOUTH 51DE OF GIRARD,. FROM BROADWAY TO LOGAN,. EXCEPTING SUCH PLACES AS MAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADING AREAS ,. BUS STOPS,. ETC . .J • • • • I • I' 32X - - - - WE, TH.E UNDERSIGNED. HEREBY PETITIOS THAT PARX1NG BE ALLOWED ON THE SOUTH SX.DE OF FROM BROADWAY TO LOGAN. C~/EXCEPT1NC SUCH PLACES AS MAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADING AREAS 9 BUS STOPS. ETC. - -- T 32X - . :1 . , ...: • • • WE,. THE UNDERS I GNED,. HEREBY PETITION THAT PARKING BE ALLOWED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FRO~ BROADWAY TO LOGAN,. GI~/EXCEPTINC SUCH PLACES AS HAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADING AREAS,. BUS STOPS,. ETC . • • • • L 1 J-- • 0 - BE ALLOW'ED ON THE SOUTH SIDE CF' WE THE UNDERSIGNED , HEREBY PETITION ~~C:~~ES AS MAY :BE NEEDED FOR LOADING ci..AR.n FROM "BROADWAY TO :LC:X:;.AN EXC:EPTING AREAS , BUS STOPS , ETC .. ,..., ...., I ( -_.:..,., ... I 1-J,.;, , __ L .., _1 ./-~-:h.: r' L cc;[a <> > /-.2,P<> t2 • Cfi'~;,.<.c -4: I 5 .:;: 3 & v-~-X • ~/.- • ..:.. • • • I' X - WE,. T HE UNDERSIGNED,. H.ERE.BY PETITION THAT PARKING BE ALLOWED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF GIRARD. FROM BROAD\.IAY TO LOGAN. EXCEPT:LNG THOSE PLACES AS MAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADI.NC AREAS. BUS STOPS, ETC. 23 24 25 26 27 28 -29 30 3~ -32 --33 34 ------ 35 36 -• r 32x • • • WE. THE UNDERS IGNED ,. HEREBY PET1TXON THAT PARKING BE ALLOW'ED ON Tti.E SOUTH SIDE OF GIRARD,. FROM BROADWAY TO LOGAN. EXCEPTING SUCH PLACES AS MAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADING AREAS. BUS STOPS , ETC . N a.Yne 31. 3 2 . 33. 3 4._ • Address I-~ ...... .. ;:__ "" ..... (... --.. _z?-JO _J~~ ""3..-7 s~ ;?,...,_..-_,.?,1~ ~ • Ci.C • • I' 32X • • • 0 - .J~~ "1'1--!C:.\..a nET:i.oJ I ~N~ , Ve~~.c.bY l t!.TIT I CJ'. T HHT l-.,-,.Rt Il ... G B -.n.LLQ";JE c t~ T HE .3C T P .3 I D<:. CF G i o-t~R:::>, FRCl· BRC.:.D.-.• Y TC 1 vG.<.J>;, i:.XCit T I NG SUCH l L A C ES AS r-~Y BE ~EOE~ ~LR 1CAO I ~G t\Rb~>, BU3 STCJS , E T C . T ~E ~~~~E~T R6STRLT I C~S "'RE ~ :·;~\. " c.I Y -:)£T RI: ..EI\.Tra.~ ~c... BUSil''E.SS . --... • • • 0 - .-IE , -n;z U 'D<:;R I GK~ , PER"-P Y FETITIC.. TH;.T <A RJ-I 'G BE ~LL 'IE N THE SL \:T • S I DE C F G I R~R Fril.. ; •• B«-AD. h y T LCGA N, EXCEPT I !.G SUCH i LA CES AS ; ·.Y BE :<;;E. '"l E D F <. "'!. <..hD il'G .. REAS , BUS 3 T C..PS , E..TC • • • • • • - - • 0 - . E , TPE U t{) ZRSI I>;.C:"J , PERE.B Y I ETITICN THJ.>.T rARl"Il\.G BE ;.LLc•. ED CN TP.E SL UT1' S I'>E GF G IRARD , F RCr. ;>RCJ-" "oil A Y TO LOG At-, EXCEFT Il'G 5.> C H PL,t;.CES AS I A "X BE "E:O.DED FCR LGADil G /,RE.-"S , BUS STLrS , ETC • • • 0 r • • • • 0 - <. _.:< 1 s / ,-~~~ 35l?S: ~~ /~~# 4/.:?C/9 s;; ~ ~s-z;r/ .2 /~~ eL' /p g' t{,b .S.q , S;:r,;::a~ r e gde;-0 ~..o~ 7~~ u.a~ ;(4-n.L- /t-:?? .s=L-~ l?"~s P •c .f<::-.R £~-._-rJ.tq '• ~Uc C t'( • - - - - 0 - -~0:, Th6 \.'t'JER..>I G t .~D , EE!"u.BY !-ETIT:I<.-r.. T h .-T lnR¥I G BE ALLC N E C TP E .>I'Jc. <F G I RARD , "'RCI' "<RCt..D,AY TC' !CGAN E.AC :t T I G 3.'CP -L•c -s ~ J.•;;.ySCBUETI-·~E '"li':'"1 F CR L C-' I I G ,_RC,.;.S BUS ..>T C-F S -f c r n ,_ ~.:> E'-t:T' E! Ely -.E.TRI I·.E 'T A L TO 'B U S II ESS ,_ • T PE I'>_ S E I\.T RE.ST R I CT I C ·s ARE /3~0~~ It _;;;, L .,//} LU b c..J: G_. "3 (.....) <f\(.....""" <-( ?;.-1 :>-O c. 9' £ F/ .. ,-4 1'1. // 7)a/ J?;?"f~./. ~ ?f C) J_ . /.. C?;.;t f Z-7<( ~-~7 ~u;.:. &-I :7.¢// _y;; ~/~d//7 • ~-_.,.~----.../ o.e2e"--=-. c;~ . 3;:::::: 2M . 'h~-/ Co 'i>b2.0'~ £0 ~ '"---' .r 0 .;z " .$ • r • 0 - • • • • ' I ~ • • r - - - 0 - Jr.. TFr.. l.:f'"ll!.R.3 1.G f En , !e E REB Y FETl.T l.CJ:\. T '-'A T 1--Jl~J.f,G u E >.Ll O WED Ch T HE SC UTP 5 1.>6 CF G I R ARD F RC; B R CAD •I ri Y T 1 C G A ', E.ACcl TING S UCH P L A CES A S I A Y B E f'E , ED F OR LCaDI NG "REHS , B U S S T G!-S , ETC . TPE FRESENT P .S TRICTIC N S hRE ;.;x·p>E: E LY DE';:Rl.l-.El-TAL T G B U S l.hES S . • I' • • 0 - .IE , TPE UNDERS I GKED , PER E.B Y l ET I T I C.K Tn T FA ID'I I\G B E A L L C El) C T P E SCU T Y -I DE CF G I RARD , F RC : BRCAD.I A Y T O lCG A ·, E.XCEi TI N G SUC P r L A C ES AS r'A Y B E • EETlED FOR I CADJ G AR"-AS , B U S .:.T CfS , l:.TC . TH E rR-SE N T R !!.S T »I: TI C'S A RE ..,.<:TR.O:' ELY DET R J.I Ef,Tn L TC., B US I NESS . • t·• -:£),.__,~ " C.cc.-~ . ......... ~ ... C .,_6 ~~ ... ~~/ ~-4 00~{;?~ ~.,.(_ C4-. .P'v ~o 0 • 0 - ~7£z.-~ ~ ?crrc ,. "' I I • • r -• - /9 • .;;o ~/ .::7.;< • ~3 .,:?/ .,:?...---- :::z-c;, :21" • • 0 - • '"'-• -f'E li~ "· I G ED , Hh~r-B Y 1-I:.TITI<.!'. Tl-'AT IAR~It:G BE ALLC..wE D CN TH E 3C TH S I E I!" GIPA~D , ""Rtl<. BR< AD.VA Y TC -C:GAN , c{CErT ING -CH I-LA CES AS .I>.AY BE t E nED FCR lCA Il\G AREAS , BUS S TC lS , ETC . T HE. FRZSE-NT RcS TRIC 'r i CNS ARE E..(T7E'--EJ Y '1""-RI; Et T,.• TC BUSi t .ESS . ..:.. • • • , 2 ~ • • • WE~ THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY PETITION THAT PARKING BE ALLOWED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF GI R...AR ROM BROADWAY TO LOGAN, ~./EXCEPTING SUCH PLACES AS HAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADI..UG AREAS, BUS STOPS, ETC. Addre..ss Ci.t • \ 1 '! -. • r 32X • WE? THE UNDERSIGNED? HEREBY PETITION THAT PARKING BE ALLOWED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF GIRARD., FROM BROADWAY TO LOGAN., EX.CEPT1NG SUCH PLACES AS MAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADING L-~ ,LJ~o: c-..-u~~/.E..Uo a~ • • • • • • \ ! :r I' 32X - WE,. THE UNDERSIGNED,. HEREBY PETITION THAT PA.RKING BE ALLOWED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF GIRARD., FROM BROADWAY TO LOGAN,. EXCEPTING SUCH PLACES AS MAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADING - -• - -I' 32X ( - WE,. THE UNDERSIGNED,. HEREBY PETITION Tl:t.AT PARKING BE ALLOWED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF GIRARD. FROM BROADWAY TO LOGAN ., EXCEPTI-NG SUCH PLACES AS MAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADING AREAS,. BUS STOPS • ETC . THE PRESENT RESTRICTIONS ARE EXTREMELY DETRIMENTAL TO BUS INESS. - --• -T 32X [ • • • • WE. THE UNDERSIGNED. HEREBY PETITION THAT PARKING BE ALLOWED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FROM BROADWAY TO L OGAN • GI~IEXCEPTING SUCH PLACES AS MAY BE NEEDED FOR LOADrNG AREAS. BUS STOPS. ETC~ L _~C - 2 . r . e 3 1 ._ 3 2._ 33. 3 4._ 3 5_,_ ..:.. Address ¢" P.a._s-.a:, / ~-«"/../~ ~~ • C:l.ey '.f . -. • 1'32X ,. • • • OF F I CI AL co'i'"''r-rc ~ocu I; E NT C O U~ 1 -...;i. FI L E INTRODU CED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN ~:NGL!::'',OOO . COLO. BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. --"~'"-':3"---• SERIES OF 1.971. AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE TAX LEVY IN MILLS UPON EACH DOLLAR OF THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY w-ITHIN THE CTrY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLOH.A.IX>, FOR THE YEAR 1972 ... WHEREAS, lt Is the duty of the City Council o:f the City of EngleWood, Colorado, under the Charter of" said City and SbLt:utes of: the State of Colorado, to make the annual levy for City purposes for the year 1971 due and payable ln 1972; and ~EREAS, It ls necessary for an a.ddlttoua.l specla.l levy to D1&intaln the Flre:tt~ens • Pension Fund at a reasonable level; and WHEREAS, the City Council has duly con.sldered the eatb:nated valu- ation of' all o£ the ta..x.a.ble property wltbln the City and the needs o'L the City £or each of said levies, and has deterJ:Dlned that the lev-lea aa herelna1ter set forth are proper and -w·lse. NOW • THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO, Section 1. T'h.at there be and there ls hereby levt.ed for"the year 1971, due and payable as requ.lred by the Statu._tes ln the year 1.972. a tax of 1.. 95 Dl.llls on the dollar for the General Fund o:f the City of Encle...rood.. Colorado .. Section 2.. That. t.bere be and there is hereby levied for the year 1.971.. due and payable as required by the statu.tee in the year 1972. a tax. of • 51. of a mill on the dollar for the Fl.remel1&' Pea.sloa. Fund of tbe Ctty of EagleW"ood. Colorado. Section 3. That there be and there is hereby levied for t:be year 1.971., due and payable Ln the year 1.972, a tax of 1.. 50 Dl.Uls on the dollar for the Public Improvement Fund. Section 4. That there be and there t.s hereby levied for the year 1971.. due and payable as requi_red. by the Sta:t:utes In the year 1972. a tax of .. 01 of a mill on the dollar for the Water Fund for the purpose of pay-D1ent o~ bonded in- debtedness and interest thereon. Section 5.. That each and every levy herei:na.bove set forth shall be lev·led upon each dollar of tbe a.aeeeaed valuation o:f all taxable property v.rtthin the corporate llxnite of the City of Eugl~ood. Colorado, and the said levies shall be certified as by the la'W required . day of Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the ---"..;>.=o:::....:-.,.<=-----day of U:c :r~.s! • t.s?t. . Read by title and passed on final reading on the / s ___7-day of q-c ---_/~ . 1971. Published by title as Ordinance No. _...:31..3 .• Series M 1971. on the g--,_.-(. day of ~ 4 ;_.,.,). 1971. Mayor • • • I' 32X I [ - • • • • Att:es t: Ex officio City Clerk I, Stephen A. Lyon. do hereby cert·lfy that the above and f:oregoing ls a true . accurate and complete copy o£ an Ordinance passed on final reading and published b y title as Ordln.anc.e No. , Series o:C 1971. Ex officio City Clerk • II • • T 32X I[ • • • • INTRODU CED AS A BrLL BY COUNCILMAN•------------------- BY AUTHORITY ORDINANCE NO. -----•• SERIES OF 1971 AN ORDINANCE FIXING THE TAX LEVY IN MILLS UPON EACH DOLLAR OF THE ASSESSED VALUATION OF ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD,. COLORADO,. FOR THE YEAR 1972 ... WHEREAS,. lt is the duty o.f the City Cou:ncU o:f the City o.f EngleWood, Colorado,. under the Charter o'f said City and Statutes o:f the State of Colorado,. to make the annual levy for City purposes :for the year 1971 due and payable In 1.972; and 'WHEREAS,. It is necessary for an additional speclal levy to m.atntaln the Flre-men.s • 'Pen.sloo Fund at a reasonable level; and WHEREAS, the City Cou-ncil bas duly considered the est.lrnated valu- ation o.f all of the ta.x.able property 'W"lthln the City and the needs o.f the City for each of said levies. and has deteru1lned that the levies as hereln.a.fter set fort:b are proper and wise. NO-w • THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO' Section 1.. 'That there be and there ls hereby levied for ·tbe year 1.971.,. due and payable as requ.t.red by the Sta.:tu.tea ln the year 1972,. a tax: of 1 .. 95 01U1s on the dollar for the General Fund of the City of Englew-ood. Colorado. Section 2... T'h.at there be and there ls hereby levied :for t:he year 1971. due and payable as required by the Sta.b.J.tes ln. the year 1972. a tax o:f ... 51 o~ a n1.Ul on the dollar for the Firemen&' Pension Fund o.f the Clty o.f E1:1Clew-ood.. Colorado. Section 3. -rhat there be and there ls hereby levied for the year 1971. due and payable ln the year 1972. a tax. of 1 ... 50 1::n.U.ls on the dollar for t:b.e Public b:nprove:rnent Fund. Section 4. -rhat there be and there Ia hereby levled :for the year 1971. due and payable as required by the Statutes In the year 1972. a tax o:f .. 01 of a mill on. the dollar .for the Water FuDcl for the purpose o:f payn::1ent of bonded ln- debtedness and lntere.st thereon. S ection 5... -rbat each and every levy hereinabove set :forth shall be levied upon each dollar of the aaaeaaed valua.tloo. o:f all taxable property 'Wi.thln t.he corporate ll.J::nlta of the Clt:y of Encle'W'ood. Colorado. and the aald levtea shall be certlfted as by the la-w-requlred. day of ___ m_n-_od_u_c_ed __ ._r_e_a_d_t_n_ful __ l :-u:9 ~~aed on flrst reading on the ------ Published as a B•ll~:~~. an Ordlo.ance on the----------day o:f Read by title and• ~:~ on final readlag on the -------day of Published by title aa Ordlna.nce No. ,..,..----• Serlee o.f 1971. on the ______ ___;day o'f • 1971. Mayor • • • - • • • • Attest: Ex-offtclo City Clerk I. Stephen A .. Lyon. do hereby certlfy that tbe above and foregoing is a true. accurate and compJete copy of an Ordinance passed on final reading and published b y title as Ordt.nance No.. • Series of 1.971. .. Ex o.fflclo City Clerk • • T 32X • • c c INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY C O U NCI LlldAN ~f~2d L ~-.C.:.L_ ~-o.-~. <-OLO B Y A U THORITY ORDINANCE NO. ,3 :;3 • SERIES OF 1971 AN ORD INANCE FIXING THE TAX LEVY IN MILLS UPON EACH DOLLAR OF T HE ASSESSED VALUATION OF ALL TAXABLE PROPERTY WYTHIN TH1!: CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. FOB THE YEAR 1.972. W HEREAS,. lt ls the duty of the City CouncU o'f the City of: EngleWood,. Colo rado ,. unde r the Charter of said City and Statutes of the State of Colortido,. to make the a nnual levy for City purposes for the year 1.971 due and payable (n 197 2 ; a nd 'WHEREAS,. lt ls necessary for an additional special levy to 'l'D.alnta.ln the F k e men.s ' Pension Fund at a rea..aon.able level; and W HEREAS,. the City Council has duly considered the estU:nated valu- ation of' a11 of the t.a.xa.ble propercy v.rltb.ln the City and the needs o:f the City for e ach o:f said levies,. and has deterznlned. that. the levies aa hereinafter set forth are proper and wlse . NOW • THEREFORE,. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO' Section 1.. That there be and there la hereby levied for"tb.e year 1971,. due and payable as required by the Statu.tes In the year 1972. a tax of 1 .. 95 Dllll& on the dollar for the General Fund o~ the City of Enc:lewood. Colorado. Section 2.. That there be and there is hereby levied for the year 1971. due a nd pay able as requ.ired by the Statutes in the year 1972. a tax o~ • 51 o:f a t:nlll on the dollar for the Flren1ens' Pension Fund of the City of Englewood. Colorado. Sectton 3.. That there be and there la hereby levied for the year 1971. due and payable i n the year 1972. a tax of 1 .. 50 JDUla on. the dollar for the Public l.l:nprov eJDe nt Fund .. Section 4 .. That there be and there is hereby levied :for the year 1.971. due and payable as required by the Statutes in the year 1972. a tax of .. 01 of a mlll on the dollar for the Water Fund :for the purpoee of payn1ent o:f bonded In- debtedness and Interest thereon .. Section. 5 .. That each and every levy hereinabove eet f:ortb. aball be l evied upon each dollar of the aaaeaaed. valua..tton of all taxable property ·w1:t.b.ln. the corpor ate ll.JD..lts of the City of Englewood. Colorado. and the aald. levtee s hall be c e rtl.fted as b y the la'W' required. day of Inq,pduced. read In full and passed on first reading on the -'-/"'F_z._· __ _ C.JZ~ • 1971.. C~_.,a.s a B:li:~~.an Ordln.ance on the ___ _,02=-C>:=::_<:<_=:>'(:._ __ day of Publlabed by title a.a Ordlnauce No.. ...3 ..3 • Series of 1971. on. the ..3 ~L day o~ 7{___,_.,_~. 1971. • • I' 32X I • • • A ttest : I. Stephen A .. Lyon. do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true ., accurate and complete copy o{ an Ordina nce passed on final reading and publls b ed b y titl e as Ordinance No.. ? 2 .. Series of" 1.971. • • • I' 32X - • • • • .L • j RESOLUTION 1"0. <-0<.. r .;.._. ~ ·c,,,-G L -.;..\. 0 --,-."Lt S ERIES OF 1.971. . 0 0 · COI..o. A RESOLUT ION A UTHORIZING THE EXECUTION BY TilE MAYOR OF THE CITY O F ENGLE ivOOD OF THAT C ERTAIN MAIN"l."ENA>.'ICE CON - TRACT, U'DER DATE OF NOVE~ffiER 1., 1.971., BETWEEN THE STATE HIG HI,;JAY CO~ll'1 ISSI ON O F COL ORADO AND THE CITY OF ENGLE- WOOD RELATIVE TO THE LANDSCAPING AND BEAUTIFICATION OF THE INTERCH A •GE LOCATED AT U .S . 285 AND SOUTH BROADWAY ST REET IN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. NOiil, THE REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COtJ!(jCIL O F THE CITY OF ENGLE \VOOD~ COLORADO~ as fo11o't'17S: Section 1. Th a t the Mayor of the City of Eng1ewood is h ereby authorized and directed to -exec ute that c er- t ain maintenance contract~ under date of November 1. 1971. between the State Highway Commission oL Co1o rado , a body corporate , acting for and on bc.ha1f of the Divi._- si.on o f High,vays, and the City o£ Eng1e'tvood, '"he r ein sai.d contract provides for the cooperative i.nsta11ation and m aintenance of 1andscapi.ng and beautification in and around the interchange 1ocated on U .S. 285 and South ~roadway St:r et i.n the City of Eng1ewood ~ Co1orado. ADOPTED AND APPROVED thi s 1.971.. Att est: ex of fi..ci..o City C1e rk .-4_--~- --=1:-=s:..:t:._ __ day of November I~ Stephe n A. Lyon, ex offi..ci..o City C1erk of the City of Eng1ewood ~ State of Co1or ado , do h ere by certify that the above and foregoing i..s a true, accurate, and cornpl.et:c copy of Rcso1uti.on No. 40 , S eries of 1971 . ex officio City _C1erk _. ~~ \ ! '!" • • r 32x