HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972-04-03 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet•
0 -
City Counci1 Meeting
Apri1 3 , 1972
•
• •
-
•
•
REGULAR MEETING:
•
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
MA.BC H 20~ 1972
The Ci..ty Counci..1 of the Ci..ty of Eng1ew-ood, Arapahoe County . Co.l.orado,
met in regu.l.ar sess~on on March 20 , 1972 , at 8:.1.5 P.M.
Mayo r S nt~. pres1.ding, ca.l..l.ed the meeting to order .
The invo catio n was given by the Reverend He.l.en Wa.l.ker o f the Eso teric
Truth Center, Science of Mind. P.l.edge o f A.l..l.egiance was .l.ed by Pack No . sa.
The Mayor asked f or r o1 1 ca11 . Upon the ca11 o f the r o .l..l., the fo.l..l.owing
present:
C o unci1 Members Brow-n, Ele.n.ni..ng , La..y , Schwab , Senti.
Absent : Counci1 Members B1ess1.ng . O h o rity .
The Mayor declared a quorum present .
A1so present were: City Manager Dial
Assistant City Manager McDivitt
City Attorney B e razdini
COUNCILMAN BROWN MOVED, COUNCILWOMAN HENNING SECONDED, THAT THE MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 6 , .1.972 , BE APPROVED AS READ. Upon the c a.l..l. o f
the ro11. the v o te resu.l.ted as fo.l..l.ows:
Ayes: C ounci1 Members Brown, He.nning . Schwab, Senti.
Nays: None
Absta.i...ni..ng: Counc1..1. Member Lay.
Absent: Counci1 Members B.l.e ssinq~ D h ority.
The Mayor dec.l.ared the motion carried.
Mayor Senti recognized Mr . and Mrs. Lawrence Montoya , 3145 South E.l.ati
Street . Precinct No. 2 , from the 1ist of Specia1 Citiz en Program Invitees . Mr.
Montoya stated that h e wou.l.d .l.ike the traffic is.l.and at E.l.ati and F1oyd retained.
Mayor S enti then recognized Mr. Stephen L. o •Kane, 3146 South V .:i~ne
Stree t, Prec~ct No. 7 , who stated he would .l.ike to see the .l.eash .l.aw enfo rced
as much as possib1e .
Mr. J . G . Robb~ns. 4268 South De~awar e Street . Precinct No. 10, e xpressed
p.l.easure w ith the efforts o f the Counci .l. and wished that it recogn i zed more
often by the pub1ic.
Mayor Senti a.l.so recognized the f o11owing persons from the .l.ist o f
Specia1 Citizen Program Invitees:
Mr . and Mrs . V~ctor Ott. 4565 South Fox Street , Precinct No. 12;
Mr . N o rman G. Marcotte, 4315 South Ka.l.amath Street, Precinct No . 12;
Mr . and Mr s. Dewey F. Mi11er , 4730 South Logan Street, Precinct No .
16;
Mr . Frank S. Reffa.l.t , 4 610 South King Street, Precinct No. 13 .
Mr. and Mrs . Wa.l.ter Lostroh. 3435 South Emerson, appeared before
C ouncil . Mr . Lostroh had received a 1etter notifying him that there wa s an
ordinance which wou.l.d de.l.ete the 3400 b1ock o f South Emerson Street from Paving
Di.stri.ct No . 21 and said he was h opefu.l. that the ordirul.nce wou.l.d be passed on
f i..na1 reading.
• •
-
-
-
-
- 2 -
Mr. Chr~s Crosby of Trout Unlimited, 4260 East Evans Avenue , appeared
before C ouncil to present a p~oposa1 for developing the S o uth Platte River into
an O pen Space are a as an alternative to channelization as proposed by the
U n i t ed States C orps o f Enginee r s . Hr. Crosby, who is Chair~an o£ Trout
Unl i mite d. note d that the d e v e lopment of an Open Space pro j ect as defined by
the N i xon administrat i on wou1d be in c o ncert wiLh what the City o f Littleton
was proposing to do. While the Bureau of Outdoor Recreatio n and the Department
o f Hous ing and Urban Deve lopme nt mig h t contribute towards the pro ject, the
c ruc~al condition , he staLe d , was 1oca1 support. I£ the City were to strongly
e ndorse the idea and tak e steps towards implementing a p1an to develo p this
alte rnative to channe1izat1on, th~n the United States Corps of Engineers wou~d
take the project serious~y .
Mr . Robert w aver, a1so of Trout Un1imited , stepped forward to show
a map of the proposed pro j ect . He n o t e d that Eng1ewood and Litt1eton were just
a sma11 section of the Greenbe1t netwo rk . An additio na1 use of the property
might be as an urban transit corridor . Mr. Weaver stated that they had esti-
mated that the 1and acquisition costs o f the pro3ec t from where the Litt1eton
proposa1 1eaves off to West Oxford Avenue wou1d be betw een 2 .5 and 3.5 mi11io n
do11ars . H e stated that without reauthorization the Corps o f Engineers c o u1d
use their share o f money which was reserved for channe1ization f o r £1ood p1ain
deve1opment. Mr. W aver emphasized that the above costs inc1uded such items
~& re1ocat~on and d pree1at~n -
Counci1man Schwab asked what Denver •s reaction to the project was .
Mr. Weaver exp1ained that there was some possibi1ity of an exchange of 1and
thro ughout the Auraria pro Ject which wou1d 1end itse1f t o a min~um amount of
Open Space deve1opment by the rai1road yards , but that for the most part the
river through Denver was a1ready channe1ed .
Mr . Dia1 stated that much of the river 1and through Eng1ewood w as
a1ready in a state of destructio n un1ike the property further south in Litt1eton.
C o nsequently, the property in Eng1e~ood needed t o be purchased and then beauti-
fied as opposed to m re1y beLng acquired f o r preservation . He inquired o f Mr.
Weaver i£ this additio na1 c o st o f ~provLng the property in addition t o acquiring
it had been pro ject d in their figures . Mr. W eaver stated that it had not .
Counci1woman Henning asked Mr . Weaver exactly what he and Hr. Crosby
were rcquest1ng of the C o uncil ~ and Hr. Weaver stated that he wou1d 1ike for
the City to ~vestigate this Open Space proposa1 as an a1ternative t o channe1iz a -
tion. Cha.nne1izati.o n he felt would not o n1y ruin 1..-.h vegetation and the fish
habitat, but 1t would enco urage more po11ution and destroy the stream f or
recreational uses. He did state that this proposal wou~d also be presented
to the Sheridan C~ty C ounci1 .
Mr. M. M. Summers , 3140 South D elaware Street . appeared before Council.
He said that since his appearance befo re the Council at the 1ast meeting opposing
"X -rated movies" in the City . he had been ove rwhelmed w ith 1etters and ca11s from
the citizens of the community . He further stated tha he had never spent s o much
time study1ng a subjec 1n his 1ife and that he had even g o ne to the xtent o f
contacting City Attorney Bera rdi.ni. ~~d District Attorney Ga11agher . The District
Attorney. he said, fe1t that an ord1nance could be passed . Mr. Summers noted
that his own attorney al s o felt that the City cou1d pass an ordinance o utlaw ing
the showing of these f i1ms .
Xt was Mr. Summers• eonc1usion that if the City Council exerc ised
c o nsidera.b1e care ~n ado pting a.n ordinance ou t1awing the sho"W in.g of ••x -rated
tnOvies" within the Ci.ty, such legislatio n wou1 d be upheld by the courts . He
indica t e d that there was a comm i ~tee o f five in addition to his w ife and himself
organize d to s e e k this 1egis1ati on. H e stated that what they wanted was an
ordina.JlCe which wou1d shut down a t..heatre sh eyo..~ing movJ..es o f this nature and
that to do so it might be necessary to impose a fine o f $300 each t~me such a
mov1e were shown along -ith a t h r~e -month 3ai1 sentence for each show ing. A
jai.1 sentence he fe1t was necessar y because a fin did n o t deter o perators
bent on showing these types o f m ovies . Mx . Summers expressed di.sp1easure w ith
the newspaper f o r opposing his stand edi.tor1a11y .
•
--
\ ! ;. 1'32 X
-
•
•
•
-3 -
Mr. Eddie Specht, Manager of the Gothic Theatre, 3263 South Bro adway ,
indicated that he had -orked for the present management f or near1y eighteen
years . The owners of the movi...e cha:Ln began showi.ng ••x -rated'' fi...1m.s, he stated,
because there were few good "G , •• ''PG," and ''R'' features avai.l..a.bl..e. He congratu-
l..ated the Cinderel..l..a City Cinema for advertising so extensi...vel..y a11 fi...l..ms rated
''PG." On the who1e , he stated , only the fi...~s rated "R" c oul..d be considered a
real.. drawing card .
He expl..ai...ned that features rated ''R'' were open to al..l.. persons, even
youngsters, and yet i...n hi...s o pinion they c o ntain just as much f o ul.. l..anguage as
his pictures . His admission price --$3 .50 to $5 .50 --serves to keep out
persons o f undesi...rabl..e character . As a matter o f fact, he noted that in the
past two years it had been necessary to ca11 the Po1~ce o n o nly t wo o ccasio ns .
He indicated that his establishment was do~ng a service to the c o mmunity of
Englewood in that they refer people to ~ario us eating establishments within
the c ommunity. Showing the type o f fi~~s his fixm specializes in is d o ne as a
matter o f eco nomic necessity . Outside of Walt Disney productions, he fe1t
O ""rler would sta..rve to death on ''G'' rated pictures_
He stated that the courts have uphe1d the showing of these fiLms
pri..rn.a.ri1y because they c o u1d n o t define "pornography."
Councilman Schwab asked Mr . §c ~e;;s 1£ he would be willing t o move
his fi.Lms to the Webber Theatre , 119 South Bro adway, Denver. Mr. Specht
indicated that he o nly d .o es as the management directs hi..m..
Mr. Schwab further inquired if he {Mr . Specht) had ever owned the
Santa Fe Theatre . Mr. Specht stated he had not but that at o ne time for a
period o f appro xLmate1y six months he had d o ne s ome part -time work on Fr idays ,
Saturdays and Sundays _
C o unciLman Bro wn asked why the age limit had been dropped fro m 21 t o
18 years f o r admittance t o these shows . Mr. Specht answered that he had merely
received a directive from the managem ent t o allo w 18-year o lds t o attend. Mr.
Bro'W'Tl asked if business had continued to i...ncrease during the past two years o r
i£ it had reached a s table plain. Mr . Specht said there was n o c o ntinued increase ,
that it had reached a stab1e plain .
C o unci1man Schwab expressed his fee1ing that the reason the judges
have n ot upheld o rdinances prohibiting the shO"ttJ i..ng of ••x -rated •• movies is that
they d o not have the ••guts •• to hand down a ru1i...ng opposing these fi.~ms and h e
further stated that he did not approve o f what Mr. Specht was d o ing. Mr.
Specht countered that Mr. Schwab entitled to his o pinion and that he
respected that right .
The minutes o f t h e Pub1ic Library Board meet ing of March 14, 1972 ,
received f o r the reco rd .
The minutes o f the Planning and Zoning Comrni.ss:i.on m.eet i.ng of February 23,
1 9 72, were received for the record.
The minutes of the Workab1e Pro gram Citiz ens • Committee meeting o f
March 2, 1972 , were received for the record .
The minutes o f the Board of Adjustment and Appeals meeting o f February 9 ,
1972, were received f o r the record.
T h e minutes o f the Parks and Recre ati o n Commission meeting of March a ,
1972, w ere received for the record.
. ,. ', I
'!"
II • •
I' 32X I
•
•
•
•
-4 -
The £inancia1 report for the month of February, 1972, was received
for the record.
Mr. Stanley H. Dial, City Manager, presented a request to vacate a 16
foot easement on the north side of the property at 4005 South Jason Street ,
known as the A1dretti property~ in order that a garage could be constructed
w~th a driveway utilizing the land n ow restricted by the easement . The easement
in question is bounded by Kalamath on the west and Jason on the east . being
the north 16 feet of Lot 11, oxford Heights . Second Fi1Lng .
Mr. Dial s tated that in order to grant the easement . he would recom-
mend that the north 30 feet of the a foot casement across the west 1Lne of the
property be dedicated to the City. This would give the necessary rjght-of-way
which would permit the alley to be paved t o comp1ete extensio n o f the a11ey
~est to South Ka1amath Street through approximate1y the center o f the right -of -
way for West Nassau Avenue.
CX>UN"C.I:LMAN SCHW'AB MOVED, COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED, THAT THE CXTY
ATTORNEY BE DIRECTED TO PREPA.RE A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE EASEMENT
IN T .HE NORTH 16 FEET OF LOT 11, OXFORD HE.IGHTS , SECOND FILING , SUBJECT TO THE
DEDICATl:ON OF THE NORTH 30 FEET OF THE 8 F0<Yr UT:I:LXT¥ EASEMENT ON THE ALDRETTI
PROPERTY . Upon he ca11 of the ro11, the vote resu1ted as fo11ows:
Ayes: Counci1 Members Brown , HennLng, Lay , Schwab , Senti.
Nays: None
Absent: Counci1 M embers B1ess~ng, Dhor ity .
The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried .
Mr . D~a1 presen ed a memorandum fro m the P1anning and ZonLng C~ission
requesting that an easement be vacated in the n o rth 16 feet of Lot 12 , Oxford
Heights, Second Fi1ing. The purpose of the vacation is to per~t the owners,
Mr. and Mrs. C o n-ay B1evLns , to construct a garage o n their property. They have
not been ab1e to d o so previo us1y because o f this 16 f oot easement. Mr. D1 a1
noted that the difference between this and the above c ons idered request is that
there was n o a11ey invo 1ved.
COUNCIL~ LAY MOVED, COUNCILMAN SCHWAB SECONDED , THAT THE CITY
ATTORNEY BE DIRECTED TO PREPARE A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE WHICH WOULD VACATE THE
16 FC>OT EASEMENT OF LOT 12, OXFORD HEIGHTS , SECOND FILING. Upon the cal.1 o f
the ro11 , the v o te resu1ted as f o1l.ows:
Ayes: C ounc11 Members Bra-n, Henning , Lay , Schwab , S enti .
Nays: N o ne
Absent: Counc11 Members B1essing , Dhority.
The Mayor dec1a r ed the motion c arried.
Mr. D1a1 presented co1ored p1ctures o f the canvas awning encroach ing
on City pro perty at 3460 South Bro adw ay , the H1 F1 Fo Fum Music Company . He
indicated that this was sLmil.ar to other requests which had been previous1y
presented except that in this case the awning w ith attending po1es encro aching
on City property had a1ready been insta11ed without prior know1edge or approva1
o f the City . Upon the advice o f the D epartment of Community Deve1o pment, certain
structural. changes had been made to the awning and, therefore, the Board o £
Adjustment and Appea1s was requesting that the Counci1 grant this request ex
_post facto.
Counci1man Lay questioned whether a sign such as the one painted on
the awning was permissilbl.e under the Municipa1 Code . City Manager Dia1 suggested
that the encroachment coul.d be approved with the provision that the sign on the
a-ni.ng be removed .
• \ r
~
• •
r 32 x
-
-
-
-
-
-5 -
CX>UNC1LM.AN LAY MOVED ~ COU1:&CILM.AN SCHWAB SECONDED, THAT THE ENCROACHMENT
OVER CrrY PROPERTY AT 3460 SOt.rrH BROADWAY • HX FX FO FUM MUSIC COMPANY , FOR AN
AWNING BE GRANTED PROVXDING TKAT SAID ENCROACHMENT COM PLY WITH ALL STANDA..R.DS OF
THE BUILDING DXV1SION AND THAT NO ADVERTISING BE AL.LCJIW'ED ON SAID AWNING. Upon
the ca11 of the ro11 , the vote resulted as fo11o-s:
Ayes: Council Members Brown, Henning , Lay , Schwab , Senti.
Nays: None
Absent: Council Mambers B1essLng, Dhority.
The Mayor declared the mot1on carr1cd.
Councilman Lay stated tnat he would like the City Attorney to advise
the Council whether these signs could be permitted on an awning encro aching
over City rights-of -way.
City Manager Dia1 presented a memorandum from the Board o£ Career
Service Commissioners in which the Board asked to b relieved o f responsLbi1ity
to recommend to Council. by May 1 of each year a pay pl.an .
Mr . Dial. indicated that this ord.1.nance was ~i.tt.en in 1.958 before
negotiat~g with C~ty emp1oyee groups was a real..1.ty . Under the process today
it is v~rtua11y Lmposs~l.e for th~ Board to pl.uy an active rol.e in eval.uating
a pay p1an because accurate sal.ary s at~stics cannot be ga~hered and presented
Ln a meaningful. form pr~or to the May 1. deadl.i..ne. In additio n , for the Board
to enter activel.y Lnto the negotiating practice via a review of the pay pl.an
l.o nger real..1.stic.
Counc1l.man Schwab f l.t that it might be appropriate to review the
entire Charter and the Municipal. Code in order to el.iminate al.l. simil.ar pro vi -
sio ns which were o ut of date .
Counci.l.ma.n Lay said that an ordinance a..mendi..ng the Board • s re.sponsi-
bil.ity was necessary because they were no l.o nger i..n a position to pl.ay a
meaningful. rol.e in the negoti.atLng process.
COUNCILM.AN BRI:JWN MOVED , COUNCILWOMAN HEN!-IING SECONDED , THAT THE CITY
ATTORNEY" BE DIRECTED TO DRAW UP A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE WHICH WOULD DELETE
SECTION 5 -2 -3 OF THE MUNIC IPAL CODE . Upon the ca11 o f the rol.l., the vote
resul.ted as fol.l.ows:
Ayes: C ouncil. M.e.mbers Bro wn . Henning, Lay , Senti .
Nays: Council. Member Schwab .
Absent: Council. Members Bl.essi..ng, Dhor ity .
The Mayor decl.ared the mo i on carried.
Counc11awa.n Lay the•-1 suggested that the Board of Career Service
Commissioners rev1ew th Counci1 "s action to recommend a provis.1.on to take
the p1ace of the.1.r pr sent rol.e as spel.1ed out in Section S-2-3 of the Code .
City Manag r Dia1 said that i£ at a11 possLb1e, he woul.d prefer to
meet with the Boa ~d to see what kind of a rol.e they sho ul.d pl.ay, that perhaps
it was appropriate for them to be appe11ate or fact -finding board.
City Manager Dial. stated hat he woul.d 1ike to depart fro m the
agenda. He indicated that the County Road and Bridge Fund monies avail.ab1e
for the City amounted to $49,000. In the past the City has used this money
a1most entire1y for seal. c oating streets the second year after they were
~ed through a paving district~ and ~o overl.ay other streets w hich w ere
much o1der . The seal. coating this year as proposed by the Public Works
Director woul.d amount to $1.6 ;000 whil.e the o ver1ay wou1d amount to $1.5 ~400
for a t ota1 pro~ect o f $31 ,400 .
• \ !
'f
--
-
-
-
-
-
-6 -
City Manager D~a1 presented a memorandum f rom the Public Works Director
proposing replacement of certain concrete on East Eastman Avenue _ When the
street was constructed in the ear1y 1950"s the curb walk that was insta11ed
was a non -c onforming type which had a 4 inch drop from the gutter lip to the flow
line instead of the standard 2 1nches . This excessive drop prohLbits installa-
tion o £ curb cuts or the overlay ing of the street as automobiles drag their
bumpers or bounce unusua11y hard o v~r this gutter section. It was the recommenda -
tion o f the Public Works Directo r tnat since the entire amount o f curb work was
non-conforming~ that it be r~moved and replaced w ith the property owner paying
only for that portion which required replacement due to condition or settlement ~
and that the City pay for the re~aLnder o f the ~mpr o vement through the County
Road and Bridge Fund.
Mr. Dia1 indicated hat he was not ready to recommend this proposa1
but would 1ike the Council to give it consideration for action at a 1ater date .
COUNCILMAN LAY MOVED~ COUNCILMAN SCffi'llAB SECX>NDED ~ THAT THE PR:>POSED
PRI:>G.RAM OF SEAL COAT AND OVERLAY AS SET FORTH IN THE ME..HORANDUM FROM THE
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TO THE CITY MANAGER DATED MARCH 3 1 1972~ BE PERFORMED
AT A TOTAL COST OF $31,400. Upon the call o f the roll, the vote resulted
follows:
Ayes: Council Members Brown , Henning . Lay . Schwab, Senti .
Nays : N o ne
Absent: Council Members Blessing , Dhority .
The Mayor dec~ared the motion carried .
BY At.r.I"R:>.R..ITY
ORDINANCE NO . , SERIES OF 1972
AN ORDINANCE VACATING THAT ALLEY LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIN BLOCK 6 ~
PREMIER ADDITION , CITY OF ENG-LEWOOD, ARAPAHOE COUNTY , CX>LOR.AIX:>, AND RESERVING
THEREIN THE RIGHT TO INSTALL , MAINTAIN, OPERATE , REPA:r..R AND REPLACE THE SEWER
AND WATER MAIN AND OTHER t.r.I"ILITIES NOW LOCATED IN SAID PUBLIC ALLEY.
City Attorney BerardLni recalled that the Counci1 had d1rected that
Mr. ChaLmerse Parker and Offices , Ltd ., sign an agreement f or the use of the
a11ey should the South Lincoln Street/South Sherman Street alley south o f
East Girard Avenue be vacated . Such an agreement has been signed he stated_
COUNCILWOMAN HENNING MC>VED , COUNCI.LMAN B.ROWN SECONDED ~ THA.T THE
SOUTH LINCOLN STREET/SOUTH SHERMAN STREET ALLEY SOUTH OF EAST GI.RA..RD AVENUE
BE VACATED . Upon the call o f the ro11, the v o te resulted as f o11ows;
Ayes: C ouncil Members Brown~ Henning, Senti .
Nays: C o unci1 Members Lay, Sch-ab .
Absent: Council Members Blessing, Dhority.
The Mayor declared the mo tion carried , but the ordLnance faL1ed .
In response t o a questio n from C o unci1-oman Henn1ng in which she
stated that anyo ne voting Ln favor o f the motion cou1d reintroduce the motion
again. Counci1man Brown indicated that he definitely wanted the measure c o n -
sidered agai-n_
BY AtrrHOR.ITY
O RDINANCE NO . 9 , SERIES OF 1972
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO _ 7 , SERIES OF 197 2, TO DELETE THE
3400 BLOCK OF SOUTH EMERSON STREET FA:>M PAVING DIST RICT NQ _ 21.
·•
--
r 32xl
-
-
-
-
-
-7 -
(Copied in fu11 in the officia~ Ordinance Book.)
CX>UNCILMAN SCHWAB MOVED , COUNC:U:~AN LAY SECONDED , THAT ORDINAI>.~E NO.
9 , SERIES OF 1972 , BE PASSED ON FINAL READING AND PUBLISHED BY TITLE rN THE
ENGLEWOC>D liERALD SENTINEL. Upon the call of the ro11, the vote resu1ted
follows:
Ayes: Council Members Brown , Henning , Lay, Schwab, Senti.
Nays: None
Absent: C ouncil Members B1essing, Dhority.
The Mayor dec1ared the m o tion carried.
Councilman Schwab noted that the next item o n the agenda, a Bill
for an Ordinance popu1ar1y known as the AnLmal Control.. Ordinance , had been
tabled at the meeting o f January 17 , 1972 , and suggested that it wou1d perhaps
be best if Council would defer action unti1 it could meet with the Animal..
Control.. C o mmittee_ He also indicated that an o rdinance o f this nature wa s
too controversial to c onsider when two members of the Council were absent _
Councilman Lay agreed, noting that the Hobby Breeders licensing
pro vision should be given considerable study it would undo ubtedly be
difficult pro vision to enforce .
By common agreement, Council moved t o the next item on the
agenda.
Introduced as a Bi11 by C oun ci~man Lay ,
A BILL FOR
AN ORDIN.ANCE AMENDING TITLE XV •G9 E .M.C., BY ADDING DEFINITIONS,
INCREASING THE APPOINTED MEMBERSHIP TO THE WATER AND SEWER BOARD , ESTABLISHING
DATES E"'R THE DELINQUENCY OF WATER BILLS , MAKING PROVISION FOR NOTICE OF
SHUT-QFF AFTER D ELINQUENCY; ABOLISHING ''VACANCY I SPECTION'' CHA.RGES o
INCREASING CHARGES FOR WATER TURN-oFF O R TURN-QN SERVICES ; At.rrl-DR.I.ZING
Ct.rr~FF FROM MAIN TO BE PERFORMED EITHER BY A STATE LICENSED AND BONDED
PLUMBER OR C ITY WATER DIVISION PERSONNEL; REQUIRING SERVICE PIPE TO CONFORM
TO THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDA-RDS; DISCONTINU~G
THE SALES OF CERTAIN MATE.R.IALS BY THE WATER Dl:V l:Sl:ON; REQUIRING ALL CONNJX:-
Tl:ONS WITH THE Cl:TY WATER SYSTEM TO BE MADE BY STA TE LICENSED AND BONDED
PLUMBERS AND REPEALING ALL O RDINANCES OR PARTS OF O RD INANC ES IN CONFLICT
HERE\'1/ITH .
City At torrey Berardini. briefly rev:i.e-ed the Bi..11. f o r an Ordinance
Revising XV of the Ci.ty Code relating to the water o peratio n . City Manager
Dia1 n o ted that this was primar~1y a house-c1eaning type o f o rdinance a1thouqh
there were two p r ovisions he would 1ike t o especia11y draw t o the Counci1 "s
~-entio n . First, this ordinance wou1d eventua11y e1Lminate the City practice
of keeping an invento ry of p1umbing items needed to make water and se-er
installations from the main to the h o use . Whi1e the City wou1.d c o ntinue to
maintain an invento ry of meters, he felt it was n o longer necessary f o r us
to carry an invento ry of these other items . Sec o nd ~ this o rdinance would
raise the de1inquent charge ~here it was necessary to turn o ff custo mers •
water and then later resto re service from $1 .00 t o $5.00 . This he stated
""'ou1d be in c onformance ""'i..th th requirements o f the surrounding cities .
COUNCI ~ LAY l-tOVED, COUNC ILMAN SCHWAB SECONDED , THAT THE BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE REVISING TITLE XV OF THE CITY CODE RELATING TO THE WATE R OPERA -
TION BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBLISHED IN FULL IN THE ENGL.EW'OOD
HERALD SENTINEL. Upon the ca11 o f the r o1 1 , the vote resulted as f o 11ows:
••
--
I' 32X I
-
•
•
•
•
-a -
Ayes: Council Members Brown, Henning , Lay, Schwab , Senti .
Nays: None
Absent: Council Members Blessing , Ohority.
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
City Manager Dial introduced Mr . Carl Zeno n, an intern working
with the City under a pro gram sponso red by the Internat~onal City Management
Association in conjunction with the Denver Regional Council o f Governments .
Mr. Zeno n , he stated, is studying f or a Master •s D egree at the University
of Denver in Public Administration and his w o rk with the City wi11 serve as
the practical applicatio n of his studies .
RESOLUTION NO . 15 , SERIES OF 1972
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE I-DUSING AND HOME FINANCE ADMINISTRATOR
TO RELIEVE THE CX:TY OF ENGLEWCX>D OF ALL LIABILITY UNDER AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY
ENTERED INTO •
(Copied in full in the official Resolutio n Boo k .)
City Manager Dial discussed the reso lution which would relieve the
City o f a11 liability under a $20 ,000 planning l o an granted to the City in
1962 by the Housing and Home Finance Administration . This planning advance
of $20 .000 is for the s o-ca11ed Hoskin s Storm D rai..nage Study.
Since very 1itt1e o f thei.r proposal had been c o nstructed and
because a new sto rm drainage plan had been prepared. the 1Lke1ihood o f the
City c o ntinuing under the Hoskins proposals wa s remote . This resolution would
relieve the C~ty o f any 1i.abi1ity f o r the payment o f this $20 ,000 except f o r
$89 .55 which represented the proportionate amo unt of the advance related t o
the public work c o nstructio n in acco rdance with the plans prepared with the
loan.
COUNCILMAN SCHWAB MOVED, COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED , THAT RESOLtrriON
NO . 15 , SERIES OF 1972 , BE A PPROVED AND ADOPTED . Upon the ca11 o f the r o11,
the v o te resulted as f o 11ow s :
Ayes: Cou.nci.1 Members Brown , Henning , Lay , Schwab , Senti .
Nays: N one
Absent ~ Counci.1 Members Blessing , Dhori.ty .
The Mayo r declared the motion carried .
City Manager Di.a1 discussed a memorandum fro m the Assistant City
Manager relating to the proposed program f o r the enforcement o f the ordinance
pro hibitLng private refuse receptacles fro m being placed o n public thorough -
fares . He further explained that a n o tice advising a11 pro perty o wners o f
the reasons f o r Council ado pting thi.s o rdinance and the method f o r enfo rcing
same would b~ sent in the near future .
RESOLUTION NO. 16 , SE RIES O F 1972
RESOLtrriON AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF THE APPLICATION FOR A GRANT
TO ACQUIRE AND D EVELOP OPEN SPACE F O R A ''G REENBELT -P ARK'' (WES T HARVARD G ULCH)
WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWCX>D, COLORADO .
(Copied in fu11 ~n offi.ci.a1 Reso1ut~on Book.>
•
!.
•
\! r 32X ____ _. __________________ ~------
•
-
-
-
-
-
-9 -
C~ty Manager Dia~ discussed the reso1ution authorizing the filing
of the application for a grant to develop the Greenbelt area in Northwest
Englewood. He noted that at the 1ast Counci1 meeting a s~1ar resolution
was approved in the amount of $206 ~000 p1us $50 ,000 for relocating a11 persons
displaced in the proJect.
According to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Mr_
Dia1 stated that it now appears that $66 ,000 shou1d be reserved for re1ocation .
The proposed resolut ion wou1d a1so include $7 ,800 for bicyc1e and hiking paths
to be constructed throughout the proposed Greenbelt. He noted that we wou1d
need approximately $50 ,000 more than the $90 ,000 budgeted ~ the Pub1ic Improve-
ment Fund £or the Gr· ~~1t program and that if the reso1ution were approved~ a
supplemental approp~~ L~on would have to be approved by the Counc~1 at a later
date.
There was s ome dLscussion as to whether or not bicycle paths
necessary . Mr . Dia1 suggested that the Counci1 vote first on whether or not
to inc1ude bicyc1e-hiking paths and then vot on the rest of the reso1ution .
This he stated wou1d not place the entire reso 1u ion in ~eopardy.
COUNCZLWOMAN HENNING MOVED~ COUNC:I:LMAN BROWN SEC:Of.\o"DED ~ THAT BICYCLE-
HI.K...ING PATHS BE INCLUDED IN THE GREENBELT PROJECT. Upon the ca11 of the ro11 ~
the vote resulted as f ollows :
Ayes: Council Members Brown ~ Henning ~ Lay ~ Senti .
Nay&: Council Member Schwab .
Absent: Council Members B1essing ~ Dhority.
T h e Mayor declared the mot~on carried .
COUNCILWOMAN HENNING MOVE D~ C OUNCILMAN BROWN SECOt~DED , THAT RESOLUTION
NO . 16 ~ SERIES OF 1972 ~ BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Upon the ca11 o f the ro11 ~
the vote resulted as f o 1 1ows:
Ayes : Cou.nci.1 Members Bra-n ~ Henning, Lay~ Schwab . Senti.
Nays: None
Absent: C ouncil M embers B1essing , Dh o rity .
T h e Mayor declared the motion carried .
City Manager D ia1 presented a reso lutio n which would grant a utility
easement to the Pub1 i c Service C ompany f o r rero uting a gas 1~ne t o the
p1ant .
RESOLUTION NO . 17 , SERIES OF 1972
RESOLt.rriON At.rrHOR..IZING GRANT OF UTILITY EASEMENT REQU:I:RED BY PUBLIC
SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO FOR GAS LINE TO THE CITY • S SEWER PLANT_
(Copied in fu11 in the official Resolution Book .)
COUNCILMAN SCHWAB MOVED~ COUNCILMAN LA)( SECONDED, THAT RESO Lt.TriON NO.
17 , SERIES OF 1972 , BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED_ Upon the ca11 o f the ro11 , the
vote resu1ted as f o 11ows:
Ayes: C ounci1 Members Brown , Henning~ Lay , Schwab, Senti .
Nays: None
Absent; Counci1 Members Blessing ~ Dhority.
The Mayor dec1ared the ~otLon carried .
•
-..
-
•
•
•
•
-10 -
City Attorney BerardinL noted that before the Greenbel..t project
cou.l.d receive favorab.l.e action by the Department of HousLng and Urban
Deve1opment, Council.. ~ou1d have to set forth its l..and acquisition po1icy
and present an appropriate reso1ution which Ln effect woul..d show the City •s
wi11Lngness to make a reasonab1e effort to acquire the property before
instituting negotiation proceedings.
RESOLUTION NO . 18, SERZES OF 1972
RESOLUTION STATING THE LAND ACQUISITION POLICY IN NORTHWEST ENGLEWOOD
FOR A GREEN -BELT PARK (WEST HARVARD GULCH) IN NORrHWEST ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO.
{Copied in fu11 in the official.. Resol..ution Book .)
COUNCILWOMAN HENNING MOVED, COUNCILMAN SCHW'AB SECONDED, THAT RESO-
LUTION NO. 1..8, SERIES OF .1.972 , BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED . Upon the cal..l.. of the
ro11, the vote resul..ted as f ol..l..ows:
Ayes: Counci1 Members Brown~ Henning~ Lay ~ Schwab. Senti.
Nays: None
Absent: Counc11 Members B1essLng ~ Dho rity.
T h e Mayor dec1ar ed the mo tio n carried.
City Manager Dia1 noted that the re1ocation requirements in the
Greenbe1t area were extensive compared with some of the other projects the
City had conducted in the past . X£ at a11 possible~ he fe1t it wou1d be
he1pfu1 to draw upon the experience of the Denver Urban Renewa1 Authority
which had been thro ugh this pro cess o n a number o f occasions. Therefore, he
advised the Counci1 that he might attempt t o secure an agreement with DURA
for their assistance in the pro ject .
Counci~n Lay asked the City Attorney to research whether or not
chi1dren p1ayLng on the streets cou1d be issued a citation . He noted that
because there was a lack of parks in his district , it was not uncommon t o
find chi1dren p1aying in the streets and that they had been told by the Po1ice
Department to discontLnue such activities .
City Attorney Berardini stated he would investigate the matter .
Counci1man Lay asked the City Attorney to research the pro blem o f
placing signs on marquees and awnings placed over the public right of way.
The City Attorney stated he wou1d do
Councilwoman Henning said she would like the Council to consider
the South P1atte Open Space proposal as presented by Trout Unlimited at a
coming study session . She stated that she was n o t interested in having a
comp1ete study of the situation made at this tLme but merely f or the Counci1
to discuss the question to see if it interested in pursuing it any further .
Councilwoman HennLng asked the City Manager to verify whether the
City o f L1tt1eton has instituted a po1icy of paying the entire paving district
a.s.sessntents .
Counci1woman H ennLng stated that in her research of Robert's Ru1es
of Order , motion to table 1asts o nly until the next nteetLng and that if the
item is not taken up at that meeting, it dies and can be reintroduced at that
tLm _ City Attorney Berardini said h e wou1d research the question further _
·•
•
•
•
•
•
-11 -
Counci1man Bro-n suggested that the Planned Development District
ordinance be removed from the table.
Cou.nci.1ma.n Schwab expressed the fee1.i..ng that it shou.1d be de1ayed
unti.1 the Council had time to discuss it in depth. It was not brought from
the table .
COUNC:r.LMAN SCHWAB MOVED, COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED , THAT THE MEETJ:NG
BE ADJOURNED. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resulted as fo11ows:
Ayes: Cou.nci.1 Mem.bers BrOW"n, He.n.n.i.ng, Lay, Schwab, Senti.
Nays: None
Absent: Council Members Blessing, Dhority.
The Mayor declared
P.M .
• •
'32x lr
-
-
-
-
-
COUNCIL C HAMBERS c rry c~/; ~!LC fAD
--· • T I?~cuM:E:N-w CIT¥ OF ENGLEWOOD ~ COLORADO
MARCH 27 , ~972 -..!
cou
SPEC IAL MEETING: Crr--y OF" ei:.:GL._£-·c F'/L '.;.
"'"Ooo. c o
The City Council o f the City o f Englewood , Arapahoe County , C o lorado,
met in special session Monday , March 27 , 1972 , at 8:00P .M., Ln the C o unci1
Chambers , City Ha11, Englewood, Colorado.
The fo11owing was the Notice of Ca1~ for the meeting:
NOTICE OF CALL BY THE MAYOR
FOR A SPECIAL SESSION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
MONDAY, MARC H 27 , 1972
7:30 P .M.
T he City Council of the City of Englewood , Arapahoe County , Colorado, is hereby
c a11ed to a special meeting at the Englewood City Ha11, 3400 S o uth E1ati Street ,
to c o nsider the f o 11owing agenda:
1ic hearing t o c o nsider the assessments o £ Paving District
No. 20 . (List of the streets and a11eys in the Paving D istrict
and c o pies o f the letters o f pro test received trans~itted here-
with .)
/s/ STA NLEY H . DIAL
City Manager
SHD/ij
ACXN"OWLE.DG.EMENT OF .RECEIPT O F NOTIC E
The f o 11ow ing perso ns , a11 Council membe r s o f the City of Englewood, do hereby
acknow ledge receipt o f notice o f the above special sessio n:
/s / Elmer E . Schwab
/S / Da11a s Dho rity
/S / M ilton E . Senti
/s/ Howard R . Brown
/S / Pau1 Blessing
/S/ Judith B . Henning
/S/ John .:J . Lay
Mayor Senti, presiding, ca1 1 ed t h e meeting t o o rder and a sked the City
Clerk t o explain why the meeting wa s being held at 8:00 P .M. opposed to 7:30
P .M.
Mr . Wi11iam L. McDivitt exp1ained that the letters to a11 affected
pro perty own ers n o tifying them of the hearing had indica ted that the meeting
would be at 8:00 P.M . On the other hand , the resolution (Reso lutio n No. 9 ,
Series o f 1972) ca11Lng f or the public hearing had set the t~e f o r 7:30 P .M.
If the meeting were he1d at 7~30 , those persons re1y~g on the ~cet~g being
he1d at 8:00 P .M. as set forth in their letters would run the risk o f not being
present when their particu1ar ~pr o vement came up f or discussion . Therefore ,
it was the City Attorney 's feeling that the meeting sho uld be he1d at 8 :00 P .H.
Mr . McDivitt indicated that at 7 :30 he made an anno uncement that those persons
already in attendance should n o t lea ve before the Counc i l convened at 8:00 P~M-
Mayor Senti then asked f o r roll ca11 . Upon the ca11 o f the ro1 1,
the f o 11owing were present:
C o uncil Members Blessing, Bro wn , Dhority, Henning , Schwab, Senti.
Absent ; C ounci1 Member Lay.
T he Mayor declared a qu o rum present .
\ I
'!
--
I' 32 X I
-
•
•
Also present ~ere:
•
-2 -
City Manager Dial
Assistant City Manager McD1vitt
City Attorney Berardini
COU CILM.AN DIIORITY MOVED . COUNCl...LMAN SCHl!VAB SECONDED , THAT THE PUBLIC
HEAR.J.NG TO CONSIDER THE A5SESSMENTS FOR PAVING DISTRICT NO . 20 BE OPENED. Upon
the call of the r oll, the vote resulted as fo11ows:
Senti .
Nays: None
Absent: Council Membe r Lay _
The Mayor declared the motion carried. and the public hearing opened at 8:05
P .M. (A tape recording o£ the public hearLng is on file with the off1c ial
records .)
Listed below ar~ tho se individuals who appeared before City Council
and the letters of protest which ~ere rece1ved.
City Manager Dia1 not~d that for thirteen years the City had c o nducted
an annual paving .i...mpro vement program ~ith the except.io n of o ne summer. He
noted that the staff prepares a preliminary list of streets and o ther Lmprove -
ments to be included in the pro posed district and Lhat this report is f o r-arded
t o him and then t o the C o uncil . The C o uncil in turn holds a hearing after
appr o pria~e advertisement to hear a11 comments , either pro or c o n . about the
district . F o 11o wLng the public hearinq , Counc11 adopts an ordinance creat1ng
the d.Lstrict.
Paving Distri ct No. 20 . he n oted. ~ould have $385.000 o f the costs
paid by the pro perty o wners benefit~ng from the impro vements wh ile the City
would pay $108,000 . The CLty 's share is to cover such items as intersectio n
paving , di ch crossings , etc .
The City Manager indicated that bids f or c o nstructio n are advertised
and that a contract 1s let t o the ~o-est and best b~dder . In addition to the
c o ntract c o st . other e~penses , inc~uding cngineer1ng assessment c o mputat1o n and
interest durLng c o nstructio n . are included in the cosr of the district . He
further e xplained that tho se perso ns paying part o~ a1~ o f their assessments
on or befo re May 22 . 1972 , wou1d rece~ve a 5 perc ~ disco unt . Perso ns choosLng
to do so c o uld pay the~r assessments o ver a ten -year period at an interest rate
of 5 percent . At any rate . the first payment due on January 1 , 1973 . does n o t
include interest .
Pub11c t"'orks Directo r Kc11s Waggoner out1:Lned the metho d used in
c o mputing assessmen costs . He n o ed that no assessments were made f o r curbs ,
gutters , and Sid -alks in place. ~hi.ch c o nforme-d 'W'ith the plans a...nd specifica -
tio ns for the proposed ~provements and which were acceptable to the City
Eng1necr.
He also noted chat the c o s~o~ ~mpro ving street intersections
throughout the Dis~r1ct and o f paving in excess of 300 f oot w1d chs and 1/B
.Lnch th1cknesses on stre ts desLqnated a~ arter~a1 within residentia1 zoning
as of January 4. 1~71, were t o be pa~d by the City_ Most o f the assessments
in the d~stricts were of a fro nt -f oo t nature and cost S7.5I per fro nt f oot .
He exp1a~ncd that the b~ds came in higher than expected . Hence , ~t
wa s possible chat s o m owners received assessment higher than they had
origina11y expected . Excavat1o n costs in part1cu1ar . he n oted , were c onsiderably
higher than antic~pated .
Mayor Senti then asked if any 1etters of protest had been received
and /or if anyo ne present wi shed to speak o n the f o 11o-ing Lmprovements :
2000 Wcs Amherst Avenue (from South Tejo n Street to o ne -ha1f blo ck w est)
The City Clerk ind~cated that no letters o f pro test had been received .
~o perso ns appeared in opposition.
• . , . •
• •
r 32x
-
-
-
-
-
-3 -
400 East Amhe r st Avenue from S o uth Logan Street t o S o uth Pennsy1vania Street)
The City C1~rk 1ndicated tha n o letters o f pro est had been received .
No persons uppear d :Ln oppos_._ ~ i..on.
2000 West Baker A venue (bet:....,een S o uth Tejon Street and Sou.-h Zu.ni Street)
M r . Ernest Bliss ~ 2060 W~st Baker , appeared an3 stated that a
Ca1ifo rn.J..a t::ype curb had be .... n :i...nsta11ed on t.he s o uth sid of the street .
Because th~s curb -a.s qenera11y ~ the shade, th~re was a tendency for ice
to bu~ld up during h w~nt.er. H~ questio ned the advisab~lity o f p1ac~nq this
type o f curO o n that side o f the sLree~.
o n "t:.h
Pub1.i.c Works Director Kells t~.a.ggoner noted tha't :l..Ce o ften bui1ds up
uth s.i.de o.t-any s reet:: in Lhe Ci+-y .
21uo W-E::St. Ba..K-er Avenue (betweeJo. South Tej o n St:re~T-and S o uth Zuni Street)
The City C1erJ-~ :t.nd~cocot"ed that ~lO 1e o f pr o ~est had been rece1ved .
No perso ns appeared irt opposit" i on ~
2200 West: Baker A venue (bet:~e~n Sou'th -~.,o n S'treet. and South Zun i Street:)
The C1ty C1erk indicared that n o 1~~t~rs o f protest had been received .
No perso ns appeared in o pp.os--.t ..... oc .
2300 We st Baker Avenue Cbe~-~ Sou~h T~ o~ SLrcet and South Zuni Street)
The C1ty Clerk .1.nd~ca ed --hat n o 1et .. ers of protest had bee-n rece~ved .
No persons appeared in o ~pos~L~on.
500 East Bates Ave nue (bet-een Sou h P~nnsy1van~a srreet and South Pear1 Street
extended)
The C~ty Clerk Lnd1catcd thaL n o 1etters o f protest had been r ece~ved.
No perso ns appeared 1n oppo s~t:l..on .
600 East Bates Avenue <from eatit o f South Pearl S reet extended to Sout h
Washington Street)
The City C1 erk :1.n di.c a ted that: no letters o f protest had been rece.J..ved .
No perso ns appe ared in oppoSLtio n .
700 ~ast Bates Avenu e (f rom Sourh WashLngto n Street to South C1arkso n StreeT)
Th City C1erk :1.nd1cared t:ha n o 1 e ers o f protest had been rece~ved _
No persons appear· d 1.n o p_pos.i.t.i o n. _
100 W est C orne 1 1 Avenu fr o m S o uth Acoma StreeL to South Banno ck Street)
The C1~y C1~rk 1ndica~ed tha n o 1etters o f pro test had been rece~ved .
N o perso ns appeared ~n opposit1o n..
200 We st C o rne11 Avenue (from So~Th Banno ck Street t o S o uth Ch ero kee Street)
The City C1 rk i.nd~cated ~hat n o 1etter s of protest had been received .
No persons appeared ln oppo~:Lt~on .
30r West C orn e ~l Avcnu tro~ SouLh CheL o kee Street t o South De1aware S t r eet)
The Ct.t:y Cl rk Uld_ca ed that: n o 1 etters of protest had been recei-ved.
N o perso ns appeared ~n oppositio n .
•
II --
r 32xl
-
-
-
-
-
-4 -
400 West Corne11 Avenue (fro~ South De1awar Street t o South Elat1 Street)
The City Clerk indicated that a ~ettcr had been received from Fern M.
Cox , 2810 South Jay S~rcet , D nver, dated Ma r ch 22, 1~72 , and c opies transmitted
C ouncil .
No persons appeared in oppositio n .
500 West Corne11 Avenue (Crom Sou h E1ati... StrecL to South Fox Street)
The City Clerk ind~cated that n o letters o f protest had been received.
No persons appeared in o ppos~ti.on.
600 West C o rnc11 Avenue (from South Fox Street to South Ga1apago Street)
The City Clerk indicated that a 1ettcr had been received Lr
Benjamin P . NaLman , 4428 Sou h Ban~ock , dated March 21, 1972, and copies
transmitted t o Council .
No perso ns appeared i.n opposition .
800 East C orne11 Avenue (fro m South Clarkson Street to S outh Emerso n Street)
Mr. Gary Patterso n , Attorney at Law , appeared o n behalf o£ Carolin e B .
Weist , 835 East C ornell . Mr . Patterso n stated that Section 12-1 -8 of the
Englewood Municipal Code specifically stated hat an owner must rec iv a
benefit to his prop rty fro m an impro vement before he can be assessed for said
improvement. This was not the case he felt with the Lmpro vement assessed t o
the pro perty at 835 East Cornell .
He r ferred to a letter dated Ma rch 2, 1~72 , addressed t o the City
C1erk and wr~tten by John A. Criswe11, Attorney at Law . M r . Crisw e11 's 1ett r
referred t o a c ourt case instituted by the City before the District Court
against Caro1in B . Weis and Pau1 Wolf, Civil Actio n No . 2 9255 . In this case
the City had c ondemned 10 teet o f property for roadway purposes and it w as th
contention of the defendants that they sho uld be c o mpensated f o r a11eged accrued
benefits now depr~ved them by 1oss o f th ~r property.
City Attorney Berardini reca11ed the case and stated that th matter
of bene£1ts wa s n o t at issue . He reca11ed that i• argu~ng the cas he had
maintained that (1) because right -of-way on1y ha.l bc..:.eon requi...red and the C.Lty
had not impro ved said right-of-way, no benefits could be assigned to the
abutting property, and (2) that the remaining pro perty wh ile Ln the then
proposed paving district had n ot y et been improved; therefore , the question
of benefit accruing to the abutting pro perty was moo t ~
Mr . Berardini cited Mr . Criswe11 's 1etter o £ March 2, cspecia11y
paragraph 2, wh i~h stated in p•rt:
The proposed assessment is n o t based upon the benefits
accrui.ng from th improvemen ts to the property i.nvo1ved and,
indeed, it is the undcrs1gned 's understandina that ne~ther
he administrative staff o f the City , no r City C o uncil , has,
or w i11 , take any evidence o r inf ormat~on upon the increased
va1ue o f this realty resu1t1ng from the c o nstructio n o f the
impro vements invo1ved .
Mr. Berardini inquired o f Mr . Patter s o n i...f he , Mr. Criswe11 , or eheir
client had submitted t o Council any evidence w hich the Counci.1 had refused to
hear . M r . Patterson indicated that no evidence had been presented.
Mr. Bcrardini asked if he (Mr . Patterson) could sho w an Lncrease in
th va1ue o f the property. Mr . Patterso n said he did n o t understand . Mr.
Berardini referred again to the 1etcer saying that it was his interpret •r~o n
that Mr . Criswell was implying that the C o unci1 refused t o hear any ev1dence
as t o whether or not the va1ue o f the pro perty i...n questio n had been affected by
the impro vement . Mr. Patterso n said that he (Mr . Crisw e11) o nly meant t o imply
that the City 's method o f assessing pro perty o wners in the d1strict was based
upon a mathemati.ca1 f o rmu1a and n o t benefit. He di...d n o t mean to imp1y that th
Council ~as unwilling to hear test~ny relating to the pro perty va~ue .
• \
'!'
--
r 32xl
-
•
•
•
-5 -
C~ty Attorney Berardini then referred to paragraph 3 o£ Mr. Cr~s-e1L 's
1etter and cited the fo1~owLng 1n part:
In any event . 1n that recent 1itigation 1nstituted by
the City be~ore the Distr1ct Court in and for Lhe County of
Arapahoe and State of Co1orado , entitl.ed "City of Engl..ewood ..
Co1orado v. Caro1ine B . Weist and PauL Wo1f .. C1vi1 Action No.
29255." the spec.i.fi.c issue o f whether the property here
i.nvo1ved wou1d be benefited at a11 by the insta11ati.on of
these improvements was taken under consideration . with the
resu1t that the court made a specific and unequi.vocab1e
finding . based upon the evidence hen submitted . that the
improvement invoLved conferred no benefits whatsoever upon
this property.
Mr . Berardi.n~ sa1d that the issue was whether or not the City was
under an obligation to show evidence of benerits accruing to the property.
The Court ruled; according to Mr . Berardini ~ that the City was not obligated
to introduce evidence of ber.efit in order to set-off any award to Mrs. Weist.
Mr. Patterson saJ.. that J..t was his interpretation that the Commi.ssi.oners
had said that there was no value. Mr. Berardi.nJ.. stated that Judge Foo te had
ruled that the C~ty was not requ1red to show whether there was any value . He
said that the CJ..ty had the option o£ presenting evidence of an increase in the
va1ue of the property as a result of the improvements but that it chose not to
do so since the improvements had not been made at the time . Mr _ Berardini again
asked Mr. Patterson if he had any vidence bearing on the qu stion of value
accruing to the Weist property ; saying that if the client feels that the assess -
ment is Lmproper, then the City should know the reasons why.
Mr . Patterson stated that he did not know if there was any (benef1t)
at a~l -He felt that it was quite possUble that there might be benef~ts
accruing to property in general through such improvement d1stricts but that
there wa s inequity to this particu~ar property owner . Mr. Berard~n~ asked
M r . Patterson if he c ould show thJ..s. Mr. Patterson stated that he cou1d not.
Mayor Senti interJected; saying that un1ess there were further po:Lnts
to be made by either attorney~ 1t would be 1n the best interests of those
attending the hearing to move on to the nex improve~ent on the agenda .
Mr _ McDivitt announced that in addition ~o the letter from Mr _ Criswell
a letter from Mr . John c. Ho1oubek; 3046 South Clarkson Street; dated March 20 ;
1972 , had been received~ and that copies o f both 1ct~ers had been trans~itted to
C ouncil .
900 East Cornell Avenue (from South Emerson Street t o South Ogden Street)
The City Clerk indicated that a letter had been rece1ved from Donald
Weakland dated Ma rch 21 , 1972; and copies transmitted to Council .
T he c~ty Clerk 1nd1cated that a letter had been receJ..ved from Elmco ,
Xnc .; 5050 South Emporia Street , dated Mar ch 17; 1972; and copies transmitted
to Council .
Mr. Donald Weakland appeared before Council and sa1d that if Emerson
Street went through, he could see some benefit accru1ng to his property as a
resu1t of the improvement . Because he did not front on the property . he said
he could not see that he had received any benefJ..t from the improvement_
Public Works D1recto r Ke11s Waggoner ind~cated that Mr . Weakland had
received a rear zone assessment and stated that the total ownersh:Lp of Mr .
Weak1and"s property does have access.
Mr. Weakland again stated that his property did not have access to
pub.l1c street .
Counci1ma.n. Schw a.]:) asked M :r. Weak.l.and if he c ou ld ge·t a driveway into
his property and Mr. Weakland stated that he c ou1d not _
M r . Weakland then stated that approximate.l.y 98 percent o f the property
owntrs aLong that particular street had been o p posed to the improve~ent in the
first p1ace. How ~ he asked ; could the C ouncil go a .gainst the major1ty.
~,-----.. --------------------------..... ,. ............ ~~ ...... ~~ ...... ~ .. ~-.. '6~,..~
• •
T 32 X I(
-
•
•
•
•
-6 -
Mayor Senti.. said he appreciated Mr . Weak1a.nd appearing before the
Counci~.
Mr. Weak1and asked what he shou1d do next.
Mayor Senti indicated the Counci.1 wou1d study the matter and make
decision 1ater .
4700 South Decatur Street (from West Union Avenue to West Layton Avenue}
The City C1erk indicated that a 1etter had been received from
Windsor B . Wade, Jr ., 2903 W . Layton Avenue, dated March 17, 1972, and c op1es
transmitted to Counci..1.
Mr. Wade appeared and stated that apparent1y the machine operator
had accidenta11y pu11 ed approximate1y ten feet of sidewa1k 1oose when he was
doing the work and that he wa s , therefore, being bi11ed for an extra ten feet
of sidewa1k i...mprove.ment. •• X should be b.i...11ed f o r 30 feet and n o t 40 feet ,"
he said.
Mrs . May Ferguson, 2740 west un~on, appeared before Counci1 and
asked why the City made a distinction bet-een front foot and side foot
assessments and said that the only advantage she could see from the Lmprove-
ment was that there -as a 1itt1e 1ess dust t o c ontend with than before .
4800 South Decatur Street (from West Layto n Avenue to Wes t Chenango Avenue)
The City Clerk indicated that n o 1etters of protest had been received .
No persons appeared in o ppositio n.
3300 South Lafay ette Street (fro m East Floyd Avenue to East Girard Avenue)
The City C1erk indicated that n o 1etters of protest had been received.
N o persons appeared in o pposition .
3400 South Lafay ette Street (from East Girard Avenue to East Hampden Avenue)
The City Clerk indicated that n o 1etters of protest had been received.
No perso ns appeared 1n o pposition.
000 West Lehigh Avenue (fro m S o uth Broadw ay t o South Acoma Street)
The City C1erk ind icated that a 1etter had been received fro m s_ R .
Andrews , Divisio n Real Estate Representative , C o ntinental Oil Company , 1755
Glenarm Place , Denver , dated March 2 1 , 1972 , and copies transmitted to Counci1 .
No persons appeared in oppositio n.
100 West Lehigh Avenue (from South Aco ma Street to South Bannock Street)
The City Clerk indicated that no letters of protest had been received .
No persons appeared in opposition.
200 West L e hig h Avenue (from South Banno ck Street t o South Cherokee Street)
The City C1erk indicated that n o letters of pro test had been received .
N o perso ns appeared in o ppositio n.
300 West Lehigh Avenue (fro m South Chero kee Street t o S o uth D elaware Street)
The City C1erk indicated that n o 1etters o f pro test had been received .
N o persons appe a red i n o p positio n .
4600 South Linco ln Street (fro m East Tu£ts Avenue t o East Union A venue)
The City Clerk indicated that n o 1etters o f protest had been received .
. , .
• •
I' 32X I
•
•
•
-7 -
No persons appeared in opposition.
000 West Ma.nsfi.el~d Avenue (from South Broadway to South Acoma Street)
The City Clerk indicated that a letter had been received from Howard
and Eve1yn Phi11~ps , 1031 PaLmer Road , Rockledge. Florida, dated March 1G, 1972,
and copies transmitted to Council.
No persons appeared in opposition.
100 West Mansfie1d Avenue (from South Acoma Street to South Bannock Street)
200 West Mansfie1d Avenue (from South Bannock Street to South Chero kee Street)
300 West Mansfie1d Avenue (from South Cherokee Street to South De1aware Street)
400 West Mansfield Avenue (from South De1aware Street to South E1ati Street)
500 West Mansfield Avenue (from South E1ati Street to South Fox Street)
3100 South Marion Street (from East Dartmouth Avenue to East Eastman Avenue)
2700 South Pennsy 1vania Street (from East Ya1e Avenue t o East Amherst Avenue)
3500 South Pennsy1van ia Street (from East Hampden Avenue to U .S . 285)
300 West Princeton Avenue (from S o uth Cherokee Street to South De1aware Street)
400 West Princeton Avenue (from South Delaware Street t o South E1ati Street)
500 West Princeton Avenue (from South Elati Street to South Fox Street)
GOO West Princeto n Avenue (from South Fox Street to South Ga1apago Street)
700 West Princeton Avenue (from South Ga1apago Street to South Huron Street)
500 East Union Avenue (from South Pennsyl-vania Street t o South Pear1 Street)
600 East Union Avenue (from South Pear1 Street t o South Washington Street)
700 East unio n Avenue (fro m South washington Street t o S outh Cl-arkso n Street)
GOO East Ya1e P1ace (from South Pear1 Street to about 125 feet east)
A11ey bet-een S outh Broadway and South Lincoln Street -2700 block s o uth -East
Yale Avenue t o East Amherst Avenue
A11ey betwe en South Broadway and South Lincoln Street -2800 b1ock south -East
Amherst Avenue
A11ey betw een South Bro adway and S o uth Linco1n Street -2900 b1ock south -East
Bates Avenue t o East Cornell.. Avenue
A11ey between South Broadway and South LincoLn Street -4300 b1ock s o uth -East
Quincy Avenue to East Radcliff Avenue
A11ey between South Broadway and S outh Linco1n Street -4400 b1ock south -East
Radc1iff Avenue to East Stanford Avenue
The City C1erk indicated that no letters o f protest had been received
on any of the above 1isted streets (c ommenc~ng with 100 West Man sfield Avenue) •
No persons appeared in opposition re1ative to any o f the above
mentioned streets.
A11ey between South Acoma Street and South Broadw ay -4400 b1ock s ou th -East
Radc1iff Avenue to West Stanford Avenue
The City Clerk indicated that a letter had been received fro m J o hn w .
Geiger , Jr •• C ounci1 f o r Agnes Mary Kinney. own er of property at 44 55 South
Broadway , dated March 17 , 1972 , and c o pies transmitted to Cou.nci1.
•
• •
1'32X
1 -
•
•
•
-a -
City Manager Dial. inquired of the City C1erk about a letter he (the
Clerk) had distr1buted to Council prior to the meotLng. The 1cttcr according
to the City Clerk was from an Effie McGuire, 1103 West Mathias, Roswell , New
Mexico 88201, dated March 23, 1972. From her letter it was not apparent whether
she was protesting a..n. i..mprovement in Paving District No. 20 or the proposed
Paving District No. 21. City Attorney Berardini. said that the letter should be
referred to the Engineering Department to determine which district it pertained
to .
Counci.1.ma.n Dhori.ty said that al.l. of the letters o f protest sho uld be
referred to the Engineering Di.vi.si.on so that the specific protests c ould be
studied.
An unidentified woman from the audience asked Lf the Public Works
Director could go over aga1n the costs o f sidewa1k improvements. Pub11c Works
Director Ke11s Waggoner did so.
COUNCILMAN SCHWAB MOVED, COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED , THAT THE PUBLIC
HEARING BE CLOSED. Upon the ca11 o f the ro11. the vote resu1ted as f o~1o~s:
Ayes: Counci1 Members B1essing, Brown, Dho.rity, Henning , Schwab,
Senti..
Nays: None
Absent: Counci.1 Member Lay.
The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried, and the pub1i.c hearing closed at 9:15
P.M .
COUNCILMAN SCHWAB MOVED , COUNCILMAN B.ROWN SECONDED, THAT THE MEETX.NG
BE ADJOURNED. Upon the ca11 of the ro11, the vote resu1ted as f o11ows:
Ayes: Counci.1 Members B1essLng, Brown, Dbority, Henn1ng, Schwab,
Senti .
Nays: None
Absent: Counci.1 Member Lay.
The Mayor declared the motion carried, and the meeting adjourned at 9:15P .M.
•
• •
1 -
-
-
-
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COL~C ILHA .. 'l LAY
BY AUTHORITY
:>RDINANCE NO. SERIES OF 1972
AN ORDINA.'ICE A!-::ENDING TITLE XV '69 E.N.C. > BY ADDING
DEFINITIONS, INCREASI~G THE APPOINTED ME~lliERSHIP TO
THE WATER AND SEWER BOARD, ESTABLISHING DATES FOR THE
DELINQUE N CY OF WATER BILLS, MAKING PROVISION FOR NOTICE
OF SHUT-OFF AFTER DELINQUENCY; ABOLISHING "VACANCY
INSPECTION" CHARGES; INCREASING CHARGES FOR \..lATER TURN-OFF
OR TURN-ON SERVICES; AUTHORIZING CUT-OFF FRON MAIN TO BE
PERFORNED EITHER BY A STATE LICENSED AND BONDED PLUMBER
OR CITY \..lATER DIVISION PERSONNEL; REQUIRING SERVICE PIPE
TO CONFORM TO THE UNIFORM BUILDI NG CODE SPECIFICATIONS
AND STANDARDS; DISCONTil\TUING THE SALES OF CERTAIN MATERIALS
BY THE WATER DIVISION; REQUIRING ALL CONNECTIONS WI'IR THE
CITY WATER SYSTEM TO BE MADE BY STATE LICENSED AND BONDED
PLUMBERS AND REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES
IN CONFLICT HEREWITH.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGIEWOOD, COLORADO, as fo11o"'s:
Sect~on 1. That Sect~on 15-1-1 of the C~ty Code
entf..t1ed ''Oefi..n1..t:ions'' i.s hereby .a:Inended t:o read as fo11ows:
15.-1-1: DEFINITIONS
As used ~ this t~t1e, the fo11owing words and
phrases sha11 hav-e the fo11owing mean~gs:
(a) C~ty: The C~ty of Eng1ewood, Co1orado, act~ng
by and through its C~ty Counc~1 under the Home
Ru.1e Charter Statutes and Ordi...nances of said
CLty of Eng1ewood.
(b) CLty Man~ger: Ch~ef admin~strat~ve off~cer
of the C~ty of Eng1ewood ..
(c) DLrector of Ut~1~t~es: The du1y des~gnated C~ty
Off~c~a1 through whom the C~ty Counc~1 and the
C~ty Manager may exercise their powers.
(d) Water D~~sion: The sect~on of the Ut~1~t~es
Department under and through which the municipa1
~ater works system is operated under the direction
of the C~ty Counci1, City Manager and Director
of Uti1ities.
-1-
--
-
-
-
-
(e)
-
Wa~er System: A11 p1ant faci1ities and dis-
tribution mains owned and operated by the City
of Eng 1ewood.
(£) Bonded P1umber: A person 1icensed as a Master
P1umber under the 1aws of the State of Co1orado
and under bond to the City as provided herein.
(g) License: Sha11 mean the permission to use
~ater for the purpose specified in the autho~ty
to use.
(h) ~censee: Any person. corporation~ governmenta1
authority or agency authorized to use water
under a 1icense.
(~) Service P~pe: A11 p~ping 1awfu11y insta11ed
between the water main (or an extension thereof)
and the 1icensee's property 1ines.
(j) Premises: A tract of 1&Dd wdth .bui1dings thereon.
Sect~on 2. That Sect~on 15-2-1 of the C~ty Code
enti.t1ed ••Board Esta.b1ished'' is hereby amended to read a..s
fo11ows:
15-2-1: BOARD ESTABLISHED
There is hereby est:ab1ished a Water and Sewer
Board c:.onsi.-sting of the Mayor of the City, tw-o
CounciLmen se1ected by the City Counci1, and six
members appointed by the Counci1 from qua1ified
taxpaying e1ectors, serving sLx over-1apping terms
o£ six years_ A representat~ve from the City
~nLstratLon sha11 be appo~nted by the C~ty
Manager to serve as an ex-officio, non-voting
meD>ber. One """mber of the Board sha11 be appointed
by the Counci1 to serve unti1 February 1, 1960;
two members of the Board sha11 be appoLnted by
the Counc~1 to serve unt~ 1 February 1. 1964 _
Thereafter, members of the said Board sha11 be
appointed by the Counci1 for te~s of sLx years_
Counci1 members of said Board sha11 serve during
their tenure. as such Cou.nci1men_ A11 ute.tnbers of
the Water and Sewer Board sha11 be subject to
remova1 by the Counc~1-The Counc~1 sha11 make
appointments to fi11 vacancies for the unexpired
terms . (Charter. §61; 1962 Code. §8.1)
-2-
•
--
'32x
-
•
•
•
•
Sect~on 3. That Sect~on 15-3-17 of the City Code
entitled .. De1i.nquent:: Water Bi.11s'' is hereby amended t:o rea.d.
as fo11o-w-s:
15-3-17: DELINQUENT WATER BILLS
Water b~11s on metered rates and schedu1ed f1at
rates become de1i.nquent: thirty days after the date
of the bi11ing_ Schedu1ed f1at: rates become delin-
quent thirty days after the beginning of the quarter
for ~hich they are rendered. Water is subject to
turn-off without: notice whenever a bi11 therefor
has become delinquent ; provided that the Water
Division sha11 give a five day ~tten notice
before act::~a11y turning off water for non-payment .
Such notice sha11 be ~fect:ed by regular m~1 to
the owner or occupant of the premises for which the
charge is due. The obligation to pay promptly for
water service is not in any way affected by fai1ure
of the owner or occupant of the premises served
to receive a bi11 for the service. ('1.962 Code •. ~8.6-6)
Section 4. That Section 15-3-18 of the City Code
entf..t1ed ''Refund of Charges•• is hereby amended to read
as fo11ows:
15-3-18: REFUND OF CHARGES
Refunds of schedu1ed charges wi11 be made for
any portion of a property which sha11 have been
vacant» provided such vacancy sha11 have been
reported to the Water Division in WTiting and the
vacancy inspection sha11 have been made. Refunds
aha11 date from receipt of notice. Refunds sha11
a1so be a11owed in cases where services are turned
off by the Water Division and proper charge for such
turn-of£ sha1 ,_ have been paid. No credit: or refund
aha11 be given for excessive consumption or use of
water due to broken service 1ines or 1eaking fixtures
beyond the meter when a meter is required.
(a) In the event of excessive consumption
caused by underground service 1ines
broken beyond the meter, up to 507. credit
for 1oss of water over norma1 consumption
is recorded for s~1ar prior periods wi11
be given if a p1umber is under a contract
to make repairs within 72 hours after
discovery of such break. (1962 Code. 58.6-7)
-3-
• \ !
-r
• •
-
-
-
-
-
S e c tion 5 . Th a t S e ct ion ~5-3-2 2 of t he City C o d e
en t it:1e d "Cha r g es f or Tu rni ng O ff and On Water" is h e r e by
amende d to r e ad as fo11ows:
15-3-22: CHARGES FOR TUR...'l"I N G OFF AND ON WATER
In case a 1icense sha11 be revoked for cause,
and for that reason the water sha11 have been turned
off, a charge of $5.00 sha11 be made. If water
turned off at the curb box by the Water Division
is un1aw£u11y turned on, or caused to be turned on,
by the ~ser. or if the waterway contro11ing the
service is not readi1y accessib1e, the service may
be cut off at the main by the Water Division. and
before the water wi11 be turned on again the user
desiring same on said premises sha11 pay the cost
and expense of turning off and on inc1uding digging
Ln the street and permit for cutting pave~ent .
When a request is made by the 1icensee to have the
water turned off. a charge of $5.00 sha11 be made
for each such turn-off. (1962 Code •. §8.6-11)
Section 6. That Section 15-3-32 of the City Code
en.tit1ed "Tapping of Mai..ns" is hereby amended t:o read as
fo11o-s :
15-3-32: TAPPING AND CUTTING OFF MAINS
(a) The tapping of any =ain for the purpose of
~aking a connection sha11 be done on1y by the Water
D~vis~on and at the expense of the app1icant. The
corporation va1ve inserted ~n the ~ain and the
service pipe to be 1aid must be of the sLze specified
in the permit. ( 1963 Code • §4-2)
(b) The cutting off fro= =ains =ay be performed by
e~ther a 1ice~sed and bonded p1umber or by Water
D~~sion personne1. In the event Wat~r Division
personne1 perform the cut off and the t:ap is to be
abandoned a charge of $25.00 wi11 be due from the
app1icant.
Section 7. That Section 15-3-33 of the City Code
entit1ed ''Specifications for Service Pipe'' is hereby amended
to read as fo11o-s:
15-3-33: SPECIFICATIONS FOR SERVICE PIPE
Each service pipe =ust be of the fo11owing specifi-
cations:
(a) Copper pipe. A11 service pipe from the main
to the property 1ine sha11 be not: 1ess than
Type ''K'' soft copper tubing conforming to
standard specifications.
-4-
•
--
1'32X
•
-
-
-
(b) Cast iron pipe. Cast iron pipe sha11 be
C1ass 150 c e ncr~fu g a11y cast.
(c) Ga1vanized pipe. Ga1vanized pipe insta11ations
are permissib1e fro m the property 1ine into
and through premises.
(d) The use of b1ack p 1pe 1n 1nsta11at1ons 1s
proh1bited.
(e) Service pipes sha11 extend into the premises or
riser as specified. and in no case sha11 be
SU1S.11er than 3/4'' dian:aeter. A11 si11cocks .
fa~cets or hydrants used for irrigation pur-
poses sha11 be fed through a 3/4,. pipe or
1arger. (1962 Code. §8.4-4)
(f) Other ~ateria1s may be used on1y upon the
expressed approva1 of the City Engineer or
Director of Uti1ities.
Section 8. That Section 15-3-34 of the C1ty Code
ent:f..t1ed "Ma.t:eria1s to be Purchased From City'' is hereby
amended to read as fo11o~:
~-3-34: MATERIALS TO BE PURCHASED FROM CITY
In the case of perinan.ent::: con.nect::f..ons to the
~ns of the City water system~ the app1icant sha11
purchase from the Water Division the fo11owirig
JDateria.1s:
(a.) The corporation stop by which connection is
made to the ~ain.
(b) Water meter when requ1red.
Section 9. That Section ~-3-52 of the C1ty Code
ent:it1ed ''Work to be Done by Bonded P1UJDber'' is hereby
amended to read as fo11ows:
~-3-52: WORK TO BE DONE BY STATE LICENSED AND
BONDED PLUMBER
A11 WC»rk in connect::ion wit.h water pipes or
fLxtures connected to or to be connected to the
water syste~ sha11 be done by a state 1icensed
p1umber under bond to the City . (1962 Code. §8.4-3)
Section 10. That a11 Ordinances and parts of
Ordinances in conf1 i ct here~th are hereby express1y
repea1ed •
-5-
•
T 32X ----------~ .............................. ~------------~--------
•
•
•
•
•
Introduced. read in fu 1 1 and passed on fina1 read~ng
o n the 20th day of March, 1972.
Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the 23rd day
of March. 1.972.
Read by tit1e and passed on fina1 re a ding on the
day of O e L.<.•"/ • 1.972.
Publ.~shed by t ~tl.e as Ordinance N o .
Seri e s of 1 9 72 o n the day o f 1.9 72 .
Attes t:
ex off~c~o C~ty Cl.erk
I: • -=-~~---:-----:,...---....,..------• do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a. true, accurate and com..p1ete
copy of an. Ordin ance, pas sed on fi:na1 re ad.ing an.d pub1ished
by t~t:1e as Ord~ance N o. -----• Ser~es of 1972.
ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk
-6-
• \ !
~
• •
I' 32 X I
-1.
•
•
•
A...."l ORor::.=. _ _:.:c=: .=...PP~o· .. :z:.:G ':":-;::=: :-.-::.:::-~=:: c os-:-c: ':"!-::::
I:-:..PROVE:-:.z::'::'s :-:.=-. .:JE r:: p,.:.._ .. _·z::G ==s72.IC -=' ::o . 21J ~
IN THE c=~·=-· c= E::G~.;:::-;2 c :::, CC=.C :\....;~0; .=.-..??~.C':!:XG
AND C OXFI?...:-:I::G ":':i:E A??0~7IC:::.:z::".:" OF s.;=:::) C C ST
TO EACH L07 OR T:r:t..;CT OF ~-;:-:=:') I~ snrn =>IS7RICT;
ASSESSI :-:G ~ SE::..R.E OF s;;.zu CCST .:..GAI::s":" E..;;c;..:
LOT OR TR;CT 0? LA~D I~ 7HE ~IST~I C T; ?~ESCRIB
XNG THE :-:.;::::ER FOR THE C C.!...LEC'TIO:-: n.X::> ?.n.Y:-:=:::T
OF SAID ;;._ssESS:·lEXTS ; A....'-'0 DEC~XG A;; E:-:...ERGE~CY .
WHEREAs, by Ordinance No. 7, Series 1971, fina11y passed
and adopted on March 15, 1971, the City Counc i1 has created Paving
D1strict No. 20, within the City of Englewood, for the purpose
of constructing and insta11ing certain street and a11ey improvements
therein; and
WHEREAS. the improvements authorized by said Ordinance
have been comp.l.eted and accepted by the City and the who.l.e cost
of such ~provements has been determined; and
WHEREAS, an assessment ro.l..l. has been prepared and a
atate~ent showing the tota.l. cost of the Lmprovements has been du.l.y
f~ed with the City Counci.l. and due notice ~as given that the City
o0unci1 wou1d meet to hear and consider objections to the assess-
~t ro~.l. on Monday. March 27, .1.972, and that the owners of property
named in said assessment ro11 might, on or before March 22, 1972,
f~~e with the Director of Finance, in writing, his or their ob-
jections to the assessments; and
WHEREAS. the City Counci.l. has heard and considered a.l..l.
·objections to the assessment ro.l..l. and the fo.l..l.owLng changes and
corrections were made:
so -
• •
• •
\ ! ;. r 32x
-I
•
•
•
o--=:e r
W .. J . Dri ve r
Ad m . o~ V e~-A1~a~r s
~a shi n ~to~. D . C. 2 0 ~11
(2060 ~-B ake r Ave.)
Ad a E . & A1 v a T. Su ~ers
5951 S. ~e v :~d a
Litt1 et on . C o1orado 80120
W~11 ~am J . & D or o ~hv ~
Brunne r & B en~amio P ..
Na:f.ma o
4428 S .. Bannock
Eng1ewo o d . Co 1 o .. 801 10
Caro~~n e B . Weist
835 E .. Cor oe11
Eag1ewood. Co1o. 80110
. Jobo C .. & Le na Ho1oubek
-3046 S. C1arks on
EDg1ewood. Co1o. 80110
A .. Har1an & L e ona R . Bo11
8500 W. Bow l.es A ve .
L~ttl.eton ~ Co 1 o .. 8 0 123
.(3059 S . Ogden St.)
-~adsor B. Jr .. & Mae
Lenore Wade
2903 W. Layton Ave .
Eng1ewood. Co1o .. 80110
llaye M .. Ferguson
2740 W. Union
Eogl.ewood . Col.o .. 8011.0
Tb~rd Stoke 1 y Corp .
c/o Contine ot31 O il. Co .
Tax Dep t.
1755 G1 e n a r m Pl. ..
Denver. Co1orado 80202
Howard & Eve1yn P b ~11~ps
1031 P a 1 me r Rd .
Rock1 edge. F 1a . 3 2 955
(3900 S . Acom a St .)
Agnes Mary K~nncy
706 S . ~ash~n g ton
D e nve r. Co1 o r ad o 8 0209
(4455 S. B r oad w ay)
•
Lo:: E!cc;;. !3 -· -= ~ l.. •.· :.. :E :. C· -;.
13 3 S ou t.h l a · ... n
G a rd ens -~nnex
23-3 S .G. Ra m 1ins
2 4 Ad d ition
1-2 2 Tay1ors Add .
3 2 Tay1ors Add.
Beg . 16 • E o ~ SE cor o~
Lot 25 . Dobb ins R esu b ; th
E 166~; th N 202.9~; tb w
:1.66 •; th S 202.9• to beg_
35-4-68
. .!.c;.l.o.-,
D eni.cd
Den i ed
De n ied
Denied
Den i ed
A tr . :l.o s wt o~ s wt o ~ NWl Den~ed
o~ Sec. 35-4-68 D e sc. as
comm . at a pt. on E 1 i ne
o1 C1arkson St . 320.5• No~
E • W c e o . 1 i n e o~ sd . S e c . 35 ;
tb E 143'; t h N 75'; tb W
~43•; tb S 75~ to pob being
that part o~ b1k. 5 Evanston
Bdwy Add . now vac. ·
N so• o~ S 100• o~ N 375• ~rom $100
o1 E 163• o~ B1k. 6 Evans-to $71 .43
too Bdwy A dd . no~ vacated
~a swt o1 ~~t ex. E 30'
35-4-68
18 28 Centennia1
Acres 4th F1g.
Be~-190• W o1 NE cor o~
NW~ o1 SEt Sec. 8-5-68 ;
tb. s 500.45'; tb w 286.4'
tb N 7°32• E 508.7'; tb E
220• to beg. ex. sts. 8-5-68
25-
28
1-2
8
l.
Ham. & K~11 ~e s
Bdw y. Hts .
Jacksons
Bdwy. Hts .
Deo~ed
Den~ed
1 rom
$3019.22
to
$2658.96
Den~ed
N 5• 16 Wo11enwebers Dcn~ed
37 & Bdwy Jlts .
38-42 2nd Add.
•
r ·
I
\ !
~
• •
I' 32X
-
-
-
Cou:1.c i.1, i.t ~:::pca:::s t 2-.a ~ t:-.e w::ol.e coso::. o= sa.i.d i.:::pro· .. ·e:::e.:-:.ts is
1eav.i.r:.g .$384,338.85 c.o be assessed against
the rea1 pro?erty in said District, said amount including costs
of inspection, co11ecti.on and othe r i~cidenta~s and also i.nc1ud-
Log interest as a11owed by law; and
WHEREAS, froc said statement it a1so appears that the
City COuncil has apportioned a share of the whole cost to each lot
or tract of land in said District, in accordance with the benefits
to be derived by said property and in the ·proportions and amounts
aevera1~y set forth in a Resolution adopted by the City Council on
the 22nd day of February, 1972, and in a public notice published
~ the Englewood Herald, which Resolution and Notice are by refer-
ence made a p~ hereof;
BE IT ORDAIXED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLE'I..rooo • COLORADO:
section ~-That the whole cost and apportion ~en t or the
aame, as set forth in said Reso~ution and Notice, and as amended
herein, is hereby approved and confirmed, and said apportion~ent
.i-a hereby dec.1a...red to be in acc ordance with the specia_.1 benefits
~ch the property in the District wi~1 receive by reason of the
construction of said ~provements, and a share of said cost is here-
by a .ssessed to and upon each .1ot or tract of 1a.nd within the Dis-
trict in the proportions and amounts set forth in said Reso.1ut.ion
aDd Notice, as amended.
Section 2. That said assessments sha11 be due and pay-
Ab1e at the office of the Director of Finance of the City of
Eng1ewood, within thirty days after the f.ina.1 p~b1ication of this
-82
-• \ !
-r
• -
I' 32X
•
•
•
•
O rdinance, without der.:a:1.d; ::::ro· ..... -=e..:; t!":at a..!.1 suc h assess:::e:1:t:.s ~ay,
at t he el..ect.i.on of the prope r ty O¥.t :'ler, be paid .i.n .i.!"lstaJ..1r:oe:-tts,
with i n t erest as he r e.i.na~t e r p rovided . F ailure to p ay the whole
asses sment s withi n said per i od of t h irty d a ys s ha 11 be con c1us .i.ve1Y.
considere d and he1d an el..ect.i.on on the Part of a11 person s inte r-
ested, w h eth er under d.i.sab.i.1.i.ty or otherwise , to pay .i.n such .i.n -
sta11ments ...
Such el.ect.i.on sha11 be conc J..us.i.veJ..y held and con-
sidered a s a waiver of any r i ght to question the power or juris-
diction of the C.i.ty of EngJ..ewood to construct the improvements,
the qual..ity of t .he work, the regu1a..r.i.ty or suff:i.ci..ency of the
proceedings, or the va1.i.d.i.ty or the correctness of the assessments,
or the va1idity of the 1ien thereof.
Zn the event of such e1ection to pay in insta11ments ~
the assessments sha11 be payab1e at the office of the County Treasurer
of Arapahoe County, Colorado, i.n ten (10) equa1 an.nua1 i.nsta11ments
of principal, the first of which insta11ments of pri.ncipa1 sha11 be
due and payable on or before the 1st day of January, 1973, and
tAe remainder of said installments sha11 be due and payab1e successively
on or before the 1st day of January, ~ each year thereafter,
unti1 paid Ln fu11, with interest on the unpaid principal at the
rate of five per centum (5%) per annum, commencing on May 23, 1973,
and payable each year at the time of paying insta11ments of pri.nci.pa1.
Section 3. Failure to pay any i.nsta11ment, whether of
principal or interest, when due sha11 cause the who1e of the un-
paid principal to become due and payable immediately, and the who1e
amount of the unpaid principal and accrued interest sha11 thereafter
draw interest at the rate of one per centum (1%) per month, or
83
•
• •
•
•
•
•
by 1aw. At any ti~e pr~or to t ~e Cate o= t~e tax sa1e . t~e o~~er
may pay t :r-.e a__-:-:ount of a.l..l. u:-:.pa.i.d instal..l.:nents wi.th .i.::terest at one
p er cent~~ (1%) per month , or =raction of a ~onth , and a11 p enalties
accrued and sha11 ther eupon be restored _ to the right therea f ter to ·
pay in i.nsta11cents i.n the same manner as i.f defau.l.t had not been
suffered. The owner of any property not i.n defau.l.t as to any i.n -
sta11ment or payment may. at any ti.me, pay the who1e of the unpaid
principal. wi.th accrued interest to the date of the next assessment
~sta1Lment payment d ate .
Section 4 . Payments may be made to the Director of
Finance at any t~e wi.~hi.n thirty days af~er j the ·fi.na1 publ.icati.on
of thi.s Ordinance, and an a.l.l.owance of fi.ve per centum (5 ~) wi.l.1
be ~ade on a.l..l. payments made during such period, but not thereafter.
The discount of 5~ sha 11 ap?1Y to a11 such payments, whether the
payment is the entire acount of assessment due, or a part of the
a.ssessm.ent ... ~ediate1y after the expiration of such thirty day
period, said assessments sha11 be certified to the County Treasurer
0£ Arapahoe County, Co1orado, for co11ection, as provided by 1aw.
Section 5 ... That if any tract of rea1 property included
within Paving District N~. 20 is hereafter divided or subdivided
into two or more such tracts or parce1s, the Director of Finance,
with the assistance of the Director of Pub1ic Works, is hereby
authorized and directed to divide the assessment against such tract
in the same proportion that the tract itse1£ is subdivided into
two or more such parce1s, and to certify the revised assessments to
the Treasurer of Arapahoe County, Co1orado.
Sect ion 6 ... ~1 assessments 1evied against the rea1 prop-
erty in Paving District No. 20, together with a11 interest thereon
and pena lties f or d efault in payme nt thereof, and a11 costs in
84
• \ I
~
• •
I' 32X
-
-
-
-
co11ect~~g the s~~e, sha11 cons:itute, fro~ the date of the final
pub1ication of this ordina~c e, a perpetua1 1ien in t~e severa1
amo~~ts assessed against each 1ot or tract o£ 1and. Such 1ien
sha11 have priority o ver a11 other 1iens except genera1 tax 1iens,
and sha11 be enforced in accordance with the 1aws of the State of
Co1orado.
Section 7 ... That if any one or more sections or parts of
this Ordinance sha11 be adjudged unenforceab1e or .i.nva1id, such
judgment s~a11 not affect, impair or .i.nva1.i.date the remaining pro-
visions of this Ordinance, it being the intention that the various
provisions hereof are severab1e.
section 8. By reason of the fact that bonds of Paving
District No. 20 are now outstanding and interest thereon w.i.11
•bo.rt1y become due and pa.ya.b1.e, funds must be made a.vai~ab1e from
aa.essments at the ear1.iest possible date for payment of such in-
terest, and for the ~ediate preservation of the pub1ic property,
hea.1t.h, peace and safety, it is hereby dec1ared that an emergency
exists and t .hat this Ordinance sha1.1 take effect upon its final
passage ...
section 9. A11 ordinances, or parts thereof, in conf1ict
herewith are hereby repealed. This Ordinance, after its fina.1 pass-
age, sha~1 be recorded .in a book kept for that purpose, sha11 be
authenticated by the signatures of the Mayor and Director of Finance,
and sha11 be pub1ished in the Eng1ewood Hera1d, a newspaper of gen-
era1 circulation published in said City, within seven days after
-85
v----------------------~------~~~~--~~.~~ •
--
~'32x
-
-
-
i..ts ~i.:-.a~ p:.assa.-:2, a:-:=. s:-:.a..:.l ~ a:-:.C =.-.::-a..:.:-: .irre;:-ea.l~b.:e 'l.,;:-:-::..i1 ~:-.e
assess ~er.t s hereby rr.aCe sha11 be pa.id .in =~11.
IXTR~::>UCED ~"::D ? . .:.:s:.s~D C!': FI?S-:" ~.=: . .:..::>:z:::G t t:!.s 3rc! Cay o:.-
Apr:!.~. l 972 .
Pub~1.sh ed as a b.:111 r or an ord1.!"la:-.ce on t:he 61:-.h d ay of'
Apr:!.~, ~972.
X, W:!.~~:!.a m L. McD~v:!.tt, do hereby cert:!.ry that the above
and rorego~g ~s a true, accurate. and co~p1ete copy or a b.:1~1 ror
an ord.:1nance .:intro duced , read .:in ru11, and publ.:ished ~n ru11 on the 6th day or Apr:!.~. ~972.
86 -
-..:.. • \
'f
- -
r 3 2x
-
-
•
-
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN ~.
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING T 'RE WHOLE COST OF THE
IMPROVEMENTS HADE IN PAVING DISTRICT NO . 20,
IN THE CITY OF ENGLE\~000, COLORADO; APPROVING
AND CONFIRMI NG THE APPORTIONMENT OF SAID COST
TO EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN SAID DISTRICT;
ASSESSI NG A SHARE OF SAID COST AGAINST EACH
LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN THE DISTRICT; PRESCRIB-
ING THE 1'-l.A.NNER FOR THE COLLECTION AND PAYMENT
OF SA..XD ASSESSMENTS; AND DEC.L.A..RING AN ~tERGENCY ..
WHEREAS, by Ord~ance No .. 7, series 1971, fina11y passed
and adopted on March 15, 1971, the City Counci1 has created Paving
District No .. 20, within the City of Eng1ewood, for the purpose
of constructing and inst.a11i-ng certain street and a..11ey improvements
therein; and
WHEREAS, the improvements authorized by said Ordinance
have been comp1eted and accepted by the City and the who1e cost
of such Lmprovements has been determined: and
WHEREAS, an assess~ent ro11 has been prepared and a
statement showing the tota1 cost of the ~provements has been du1y
fi1ed with the City Counci1 and due notice was given that the City
Counci1 wou1d meet to hear and consider objections to the assess-
ment ro11 on Monday, March 27, 1972, and that the owners of property
named in said assessment ro11 might, on or before March 22, 1972,
fi1e with the Director of Finance, in writing, his or their ob-
jections to the assessments: and
WHEREAS, the City Counci1 has heard and considered a11
objections to the assessme.nt ro11 and the fo11owing changes and
corrections were made:
80 -
•
• -
T 32X
•
•
•
<>v.·ne :r
W. J ~ D river
Adm . o £ Vet. ri££airs
Was hington. D. C . 204 11
(2060 W~ Bake r Ave .)
Ada E ~ & A1v a T. S umme r s
5951 S . Ne v a d a
L1tt1 e ton . Co1orado 801 2 0
W1111a m J . & Dorothy ~
Brunner & B e n~amin P.
Naiman
4428 s . B a n n ock
Eng1ewood 7 Co1o. 80110
Caro1ine B. Weist
835 E. Corn e 11
Eng1ewood. Co1o. 80110
John C. & Lena Bo1oubek
3046 S. C1arkson
Eag1ewood 7 Co1o. 80110
A. Har1an & Leona R. Bo11
8500 W. Bow1es Ave.
L~tt1eton . Co1o. 80123
(3059 S. Ogden St.)
W~ndsor B. Jr. ~ Kae
Lenore Wade
2903 W. Layton Ave .
Eng1ewood. Co1o. 80110
Maye M. Ferguson
2740 W. Union
Eng1ewood. Co1o. 80110
Third Stoke 1y Corp.
c/o Coot i n e n ~a 1 01..1 Co ~
Tax Dept .
1755 G1 e narm P1 .
Denver. Co1orado 80202
Howard & Eve1yn Phi11ips
1031 Pa1mer Rd .
Rock1edg e y F1a. 32955
(3900 S . Acoma St .)
Agnes Mary Kinney
706 S. Washin g ~on
Denver. Co1orado 80209
(4455 S. Broadway)
•
L o ~ B1ock Subdivision Ac~ion
1 3 3 S o u t:h 1 aw n D enied
G ar d e n s An n ex
23-3 S.G . Ha m 1i ns D e ni e d
24 Addition
1-2 2 Tay1ors Add.
3 2 Tay1ors Add.
Beg . 16• E o1 SE cor o1
Lot 25 . Dobbins Resub ; th
E 166•; t:b N 202.9•; tb W
166•; t:h S 202.9 9 to beg.
35-4-68
Deni.od
Denied
Denied
A tr. 1n SW~ o~ SWi o~ NWt Den1ed
o~ Sec. 35-4-68 Desc. as
comm. at a pt. on E 1ioe
o1 C1arkson St:. 320.5' N o1
E • W ceo. 1ine o1 sd. Sec. 35;
thE 143•; th N 75 9 ; t:h W
143 9 ; th S 75• to pob being
that part: o1 b1k. 5 Evanston
Bdwy Add. now vac.
N so• o1 S 100' o1 N 375' 1rom $100
o1 E 163' o1 B1k . 6 Evans-to $71.43
ton Bdwy Add . now vacated
1o SWt o~ ~~t ex. E 30'
35-4-68
18 28 Centennia1
Acres 4th F'l.g.
Denied
Be¥. 190• W o~ NE cor o~ Denied
NW~ o~ SEt Sec. B-5-68;
tb. s 500.45'; th w 286.4'
tb N 7°32' E 508.7'; thE
220• to beg. ex. sts. 8-5-68
25-8 Ham. & Ki11ies
28 Bdwy. Hts.
1-2 1 Jacksons
Bdwy. Hts.
N 5' 16 Wo11enwebers
37 & Bdwy Hts.
38-42 2nd Add.
•
1rom
$3019 .22
to
$2658.96
Denied
Denied
' !
'f
• •
•
•
•
•
h~rtEAS, =ro~ t~e s:ate~ent ~~de and fi1ed with the City
Cou~ci~, it ap?ears t~a: t~e whole cost of s aid i~provements is
t he s ~~ of S493 ,148.95 , o~ whic h ~~ou nt t he C ity o f Englewood
w~11 p ay $108,810 .10 1 eav i ng $3 B4,33B .BS to be assessed again st
the real prope rty in sa i d D istrict, said amount including costs
of inspe ction, co11ection and other incidentals and a1so inc1ud-
~ng inte r e st as a11owed by 1aw; and
WHEREAS, f rom said statement it a1so appears that the
City Council has apportioned a share of the who1e cost to each 1ot
or tract of 1and in said District, in accordance with the benefits
to be derived by said property and in the proportions and amounts
aevera11y set forth in a Resolution adopted by the City Council on
the 22nd day of February. 1972, and in a pub1ic notice pub1ished
in the Eng1ewood Hera1dr which Reso1ution and Notice are by refer-
ence made a p~t hereof;
BE IT ORDAI~ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1-That the who1e cost and apportionment of the
same. as set forth in said Reso1ution and Notice. and as amended
herein, is hereby approved and confirmed, and said apportionment
~-hereby dec1ared to be in accordance with the specia1 benefits
which the property in the District wi11 receive by reason of the
construction of said improveme.nts, and a share of said cost is here-
by assessed to and upon each 1ot or tract of 1and within the Dis-
trict in the proportions and amounts set forth in said Reso1ution
and Notice, as amended-
Section 2-That said assessments sha11 be due and pay-
ab1e at the office of the Director of Finance of the City of
Eng1ewood, within thirty days after the fina1 pub1ication of this
-82
•
• •
-
-
-
Ord~nance, without demand; provided that a~1 such assessments may,
at the e1ection of the property owner, be paid in insta11ments,
with interest as hereinafter provided .. Fai1ure to pay the who1e
assessments within said period of thirty days sha11 be conc1usive1~
considered and he1d an e1ection on the Part of a11 persons inter-
ested, whether under disabi1ity or otherwise, to pay in such in-
sta11.ments ..
such e1ection sha11 be conc1usive1y he1d and con-
sidered as a waiver of any right to question the power or juris-
diction of the City of Eng1.ewood to construct the ~provements,
the qua1ity of the work, the regu1arity or sufficiency of the
proceedings, or the va1.idity or the correctness of the assessments,
or the va1idity of the 1ien thereof-
In the event of such e1ection to pay in insta11ments,
the assessments sha11 be payab1e at the office of the County Treasurer
o£ Arapahoe County, Co1orado, in ten (10) equa1 annua1 insta1~ents
of principa1, the first of which Lnsta1~ents of principa1 sha11 be
due and payab1e on or before the 1st day of January, 1973, and
the rema~nder of said insta11ments sha11 be due and payab1e successive1y
on or before the 1st day of January, in each year thereafter,
u.nt.i..1 paid i..n fu.11, with interest on t .he unpaid pri.ncipa1 at the
rate of five per centum (5%) per annum, commencing on May 23, 1973,
and payab1e each year at the t~e of payinq insta1~ents of principa1-
Section 3-Fai1ure to pay any insta1~ent, whether of
principa1 or interest, when due sha11 cause the who1e of the un-
paid principa1 to become due and payab1e ~ediate1y, and the who1e
amount of the unpaid principa1 and accrued interest sha11 thereafter
draw interest at the rate of one per centum (1%) per month, or
83
---~---~----------------------~---------.--.---~~----~.~ ..
--
T 32X
•
•
•
fractio n of a month, unti1 the date of tax sa1e, as provided
by 1aw. At any t ime prior to the date of the tax sa1e, the owner
may pay the amount of a11 unpaid ~nsta11ments with interest at one
per centum (1 %) per month, or fraction of a month, and a11 pena1ties
accrued and sha11 thereupon be restored _ to the right thereafter to ·
pay in insta11ments in the same manner as if de£au1t had not been
suffered. The owner of any property not in defau1t as to any in-
sta11ment or payment may, at any tLme, pay the who1e o£ the unpaid
principa~ with accrued interest to the date of the next assessment
Lnsta11ment payment date.
Section 4-Payments may be made to the Director of
Finance at any t~e within thirty days a~terthe ·fina1 pub1ication
o f this Ordinance, and an a11owance of five per centum (5%) wi11
be made on a~1 payments made during such period, but not thereafter.
The discount of S% sha11 app1y to a11 such payments, whether the
p ayment is the entire amount of assessment due, or a part of the
assessment . I~ediate1y after the expiration of such thirty day
period, said assess~ents sha11 be certified to the County Treasurer
of Arapahoe County, Co1orado, for co11ection, as provided by 1aw-
Section S. That if any tract of rea1 property inc1uded
within Paving District N~. 20 is hereafter divided or subdivided
into two or ~ore such tracts or parce1s, the Director of Finance,
with the assistance of the Director of Pub1ic Works, is hereby
authorized and directed to divide the assessment against such tract
in the sa~e proportion that the tract itse1£ is subdivided into
two or more such parce1s, and to certify the revised assessments to
the Treasurer of Arapahoe County, Co1orado.
Section 6. A11 assessments 1evied against the rea1 prop-
erty in Paving District No. 20, together with a11 interest thereon
and pena1ties for defau1t in payment thereof, and a11 costs in
84
•
• •
•
•
•
•
co11ecting t h e same, sha11 constitute, from the date of the fina1
pub1ication of this ordLnance, a perpetua1 1ien in the severa1
amounts assessed agaLnst each 1ot or tract of 1and. Such 1ien
sha11 have priority over a11 other 1iens except general.. tax 1iens,
and sha11 be enforced in accordance with the 1aws of the State of
Col..orado ..
Section 7. That if any one or more sections or parts of
this Ordinance sha11 be adjudged unenforceab1e or inva1id, such
judqm.ent s h.a11. not affect, impair or i.nva.l..i.date the reutai.ni.ng pro-
visions of this Ordinance, it being t h e intention that the various
provisions hereof are severab1e.
Section 8 .. By reason of the fact that bonds of Paving
District No .. 20 are now outstanding and interest thereon wi.11
short1y become due and payab1e, funds ~ust be made avai1ab1e from
assessments at the ear1iest possib1e date for payment of such in-
terest, and for the ~ediate preservation of the pub1ic property,
hea~th, peace and safety, it is hereby dec1ared that an emergency
exists and that this Ordinance sha11 take effect upon its fina1
passage.
Section 9. A11 ordinances, or parts thereof, in conf1ict
herewith are hereby repea1ed. This Ordinance, after its fina1 pass-
age, s .ha11. be recorded in a book kept for that pu.rp<:>se, sha.11 be
authenticated by the signatures of the Mayor and Director of Finance,
and sha11 be pub1isbed in the Eng.1ewood Hera.1d, a newspaper of gen-
era1 circu1ation pub1ished in said City, within seven days after
-as -
•
• •
I' 32 X I
-
-
-
-
its £in a1 p a ssa g e , and sha11 be and rema in irrepea1ab1e unti1 the
assessme nts hereby ~ade sha11 be paid in ru11.
I NTRODUCED AND PASSED 0~1 :!"I RST READi l\.'0 t h:i.s 3 rd day o r
Ap r :1.1 , l972 .
Publ.l..she d a s a b.:1.1l.. t:or an ord1.nance o n the 6th day o f'
Apr1J., 1 9 72 .
I, W.l..11~am L. McD ~v1 tt, do hereby cert1t:y that the above
and t:orego~g ~s a true, a ccurate, and complete copy ot: a b.:1.11 for
an ord .l..n a nce .:i ntroduced, read .l..n f'u11, and publ.l..shed .l..n fu11 on the
6th day o r Apr1 1, 1972.
86 -
•
• •;
\ ! ;. '32xl
•
•
•
•
XNTRODUCEO AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN
A BILL FOR
AN ORDI NA!"CE APPROVING THE WHOLE COS T OF THE
IMPROVE ~:E~JT S !'•!ADE I ~ PAVING DISTRICT NO. 20,
IN THE CITY OF E :_.ii GLE\4000, COLORADO; A.PPROVI~G
AND CO NFIR..~a::G THE APPORTIONME:\IT OF SAID COST
TO EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN SAID DISTRICT;
ASSESSI ~G A SHARE OF SAID COST AGAI N ST EACH
LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN THE DISTRICT; PRESCRIB-
ING THE HAN~ER FOR THE COLLECTION AND PAYMENT
OF SAID ASSESSMENTS; AND DECLARING ~~ ~'~RGENCY.
WHEREAS, by Ord~nance No. 7, Series 1971, fina11y passed
and adopted on March 15, 1971, the City Counci1 has created Paving
District No. 20, within the City of Eng1ewood, for the purpose
of constructing and insta11ing certain street and a11ey improvements
t .here i.n ; and
WHEREAS, the improvements authorized by said Ordinance
have been comp1eted and accepted by the City and the who1e cost
of such ~provements has been determined; and
WHEREAS, an assessment ro11 has been prepared and a
statement showing the tota1 cost of the Lmprovements has been du1y
f~ed with the City Counci1 and due notice was given that the City
Counci1 wou1d meet to hear and consider objections to the assess-
ment ro11 on Monday, March 27, 1972, and that the owners of property
named in said assessment ro11 might, on or before March 22, 1972,
fi1e with the Director of Finance, in writing, his or their ob-
jecti.ons to the assessments; and
WHEREAS, the City Counci.1 has heard and considered a11
objections to the assessment ro11 and the fo11owing changes and
corrections were made:
so -
•
• •
~'32x
•
•
•
~·ner
W. J . Dr iver
Adm . o£ Vet. A~£airs
Washington. D. C . 20411
(2060 W. Baker Ave.)
Ada E. & A1va T . Su~ers
5951 S. Nevada
Litt1eton ~ Co1orado 80120
Wil..l..iam J. &. Dorothy :\t.
Brunner & Benjamin P-
Naiman
4428 s_ Bannock
Eog1ewood~ CoJ..o_ 80110
Caro1ioe B . Weist
835 E. Coroe11
Eog1ewood , Co1o. 80110
John C. & Lena Ho1oubek
3046 S. C1arkson
Eug1ewood, Co1o. 80110
A_ Harl..an &. L ·eona R. Bo1l..
8500 W. Bowl..es Ave.
Littl..etOD 9 Col..o. 801..23
(3059 S. Ogden St.)
Windsor B. Jr. &. Kae
Lenore Wade
2903 W. Layton Ave.
Eog1ewood , Col..o. 801..10
Kaye M. Ferguson
274.0 W. Union
Eogl..ewood, Co1o. 80110
Third Stoke1y Corp.
c/o Continental.. Oil.. Co.
Tax Dept.
1755 Gl..enarm Pl...
Denver. Col..orado 80202
Howard & Eve1yn Phi11ips
1031 Pal..mer Rd.
Rock1 edge. F1a. 32955
(3900 S. Acoma St.)
Agnes Mary K~nney
706 S . Washington
Denver. Co1orado 80209
(4455 S . Broadway)
•
Lot: B1ock Subdivision Act: ion
13 3 South1awn Denied
Gardens Annex
23-3 S .G. Ham1ins D enied
24 Addition
1-2 2 Tayl..ors Add. Deni..od
3 2 Tay1ors Add. Denied
Beg. 16' E o£ SE cor o~ Denied
Lot 25 , Dobbins Resub ; th
E 166'; th N 202.9'; th W
166"; tb S 202.9• to beg.
35-4-68
A tr. ~n swl o£ swt o£ NWt Den~ed
o£ Sec. 35-4-68 Desc. as
comm. at a pt. onE 1ine
o1 C1arkson St . 320.5' No£
E ~ W cen. 1ioe o1 sd. Sec. 35;
t:b E 143'; th N 75•; th W
143•; ~h S 75• to pob being
that part o1 bl..k. 5 Evans~on
Bdwy Add. now vac.
N so• o1 S 100• o1 N 375' ~rom $100
o1 E 163' o1 B1k. 6 Evans-to $71.43
t:oD Bdwy Add . now vacated
~o swt o£ NWt ex. E 30"
35-4-68
28 Centennial.
Acres 4th F1g.
Deni..ed
De~. 190' W o1 NE cor o1
NW~ o1 SEt Sec . 8-5-68 ;
Denied
tb. s 500.45'; tb w 286.4';
tb N 7°32" E 508.7"; tb E
220• to beg. ex. sts. 8-5-68
25-8 Bam. & K~11~es
28 Bdwy. Bts.
1-2 1 Jacksons
Bdwy. Hts.
N 5" 16 Wo11enwebers
37 & Bdwy Hts.
38-42 2nd Add.
•
1rom
$3019.22
to
$2658.96
Denied
Denied • •
r 32x
•
•
•
•
WHEREAS~ fro~ tr.e state~ent ~~de and fi1cd ~ith the City
Counci1, it appears that the ~hole cost of said i~provements is
the s~~ of $493,148 .95, of which amocnt t he City of Englewood
wi11 pay $108,810 .10 leaving $3B4,338.8Sto be assessed against
the real property in said District, said amount including costs
of inspection, collection and other incidentals and also includ-
ing interest as a11owed by 1aw; and
WHEREAS, from sa id statement it also appears that the
City COuncil has apportioned a share of the whole cost to each 1ot
or tract of land in said District, in accordance with the benefits
to be derived by said property and in the proportions and amounts
severa.11y set forth in a. Resolution adopted by the City COu.nci.1 on
the 22nd day of February, 1972, and in a pub1ic notice pub1isbed
~ the Eng1ewood Hera1d, which Reso1ution and Notice are by refer-
ence made a part hereof;
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Section 1 .. That the ~ho1e cost and apportionment of the
same, as set forth in said Reso1ution and Notice, and as amended
herein, is hereby approved and confir~ed, and said apportionment
~a hereby dec1ared to be in accordance with the specia1 benefits
which the property in the District wi11 receive by reason of the
construction of said Lmprovements, and a share of said cost is here-
by assessed to and upon each 1ot or tract of 1and within the Dis-
t.ri..ct in the proportions and a.m.oun.ts set forth in said Reso1ut.i.on
and Notice, as amended.
Section 2 .. That said assessments sha11 be due and pay-
ab1e at the office of the Director of Finance of the City of
Eng1ewood, within thirty days after the f.i.na1 p~b1.i.cat.i.on of this
-82
•
• •
~'32xl
-
-
-
-
Ordinance, without demand; oroviCed that a11 suc h assess~ents may,
a t t he e1ec t ion of the property owner, be p aid in insta11ments,
with int e r e s t as he r einaft er p rovid ed. Fai1 u re to p ay the who 1 e
assessment s w i thi n sa i d p e r ~od of thirty day s sha11 be conc 1u s ive1~
considered and he1d an electi on on the Part of a11 p e rsons int er-
ested, whether under disability or otherwise, to pay in such ~n
sta11ments.
Such e1ection s h a11 be conc1usive1y he1d and con -
sidered as a waiver of any r i ght to question the power or juri s-
d~ction of the City of Eng1ewood to construct the ~provements,
the qua1ity of the work, the regu1arity or sufficiency of the
proceedings, or the va1idity or the correctness of the assess~ents,
or the va1idity of the 1ien thereof.
rn the event of such e1ection to pay in insta1Lments.
the assessments sha11 be payab1e at the office of the County Treasurer
of Arapahoe County. Co1orado • .in ten (.1.0) equa1 an.nu.a1 insta1l...me.nts
of principa1. the first of which insta1Lments of principa.l. sha1.1. be
due and payab1e on or before the 1st day of January. 1973. and
the rema.i.n.der of said insta11ments sha11 be due and payab1e successive1y
on or before the 1st day of January. in each year thereafter.
unti1 paid in fu.l..l.. with interest on the unpaid principa1 at the
rate of five per centum (5%) per annum. commencing on May 23 • .1.973.
a..n.d payab.l.e each yea...r at t .he ti..me of paying insta11ments of pri..ncipa1.
Section 3 . Fai1ure to pay any insta.1.1ment. whether of
princi.pa1 or .interest. when due sha.l..l. cause the who1e of the un-
paid pri.nci.pa1 to become due and payab1e ~edi.ate.l.y. and the who.l.e
amount of the unpaid pri.ncipa .l. and accrued interest sha.l..l. t h ereafte r
draw inte rest a t the rate of one per centum (.1.%) per month. or
83
•
--
•
•
•
•
fraction of a m onth, unti1 the date of tax sa1e, as provided
by 1aw. At any time prior to the date of the tax sa1e, the owner
may pay the amount of a11 unpaid insta1Lments with interest at one
per centum (1%) per month, or fract ion of a month, and a11 pena1ties
accrued and sha11 thereupon be restored . to the r ight thereafter to
pay in insta11ments in the same manner as i f defau1t had not been
suffered. The owner of any property not in de£au1 t as to any in-
sta1~ment or payment may , at any tLme, pay the who1e of the unpaid
principa1 with accrued interest to the date of the next assessment
insta1~ent payment date.
Section 4. Payments may be made to the Director of
Finance at any tLme within thirty days after the fina1 pub1ication
of th~s Ordinance, and an a11owance of five per centum (5%) wi11
be made on a11 payments made during such period~ but not thereafter-
The discount of 5% sha11 app1y to a11 such payments~ whether the
payment is the entire amount of assess~ent due~ or a part of the
assessment-nmmediate1y after the expiration of such thirty day
period~ said assessments sha11 be certified to the County Treasurer
of Arapahoe County~ Co1orado~ for co11ection~ as provided by 1aw-
Section 5-That if any tract of rea1 property inc1uded
w~thin Paving District No. 20 is hereafter divided or subdivided
Lnto two or more such tracts or parce1s~ the Director of Finance~
with the assistance of the Director of Pub1ic Works~ is hereby
authorized and directed to divide the assess~ent against such tract
in the same proportion that the tract itse1£ is subdivided into
two or more such parce1s~ and to certify the revised assessments to
the Treasurer of Arapahoe County~ Co1ora do_
S ection 6. Al1 assessments 1 evied against the rea1 prop-
erty in Paving District No. 20~ together with a11 interest thereon
and pena1ties for defau1t in payment thereof~ and a11 costs in
84
•
• •
-
-
-
-
•
co11ect~ng the same, sha11 const~tute, from the date of the fina1
pub1ication of this ordinance, a perpetua1 1ien in the severa1
amounts assessed agaLnst each 1ot or tract of 1and ... Such 1ien
sha11 have priority over a11 other 1iens except genera1 tax 1iens,
and sha11 be enforced in accordance with the 1aws of the State of
Co1orado ...
section 7 ... That if any one or more sections or parts of
this Ordinance sha11 be adjudged unenforceab1e or inva1id, such
judgment sha11 not affect, ~pair or inva1idate the remaining pro-
visions o£ this Ordinance, i t being the intention that the various
provisions hereof are severab1e ...
Section a ... By reason of the fact that bonds of Paving
District No ... 20 are now outstanding and interest thereon wi11
ahort1y become due and payab1e, funds ~ust be made ava~1ab1e from
assessments at the ear1iest poss~b1e date for payment of such ~n
terest, and for the ~ediate preservation of the pub1ic property,
bea1th, peace and safety, it is hereby dec~ared that an e~ergency
exists and that this Ordinance sha11 take effect upon its fina1
passage.
section 9. A1~ ordinances, or parts thereof, in conf1ict
b.erew·i..th are hereby repeal..ed. This Ordinance, after its final.. pass-
age, sha1l.. be recorded in a book kept for that purpose, sha11 be
authenticate d by the s~qnatures of the Mayor and Director of Finan~e,
and sha1~ be pub1ished in the Eng1ewood Hera1d, a newspaper of gen-
eral.. circul..ation pub1ished in said City, within seven days after
-as -
• \
~
• •
I' 32X
•
•
•
•
its fina1 passage, and sha11 be and remain irrepea1ab1e until the
assessments hereby made sha11 be paid in fu11.
INTRODUCED AND P A SSED ON FIRST READING th~s 3rd day o r
Apr~l . 1972.
Pub1.1..shed as a b:1.11 ror an ord.1..na.nce on the 6th day o r
Ap r~l. l972 .
/;:;:n z.wl~ YOR
I, W.1..11.1..am L. McD.1..v .1..tt , do hereby cert:1.fy that the above
and rorego.1..ng .1..s a true, accurate, and complete copy o~ a b.1..11 ror
an ord .1..nance .1..ntroduced, read 1n ru11, and pub1.1..shed .1..n t:u11 on the
6th day o' Apr''• >972.~
~-·
86 -
• \
<f
• •
T 32X
-
•
•
•
•
Crry C~·F ... F l.r-I A L
'"") UMENT'
·-.., /_
c,co u· ..__._ ..
W OMAN
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCI~
Ty O F C "GL -·• .:; FILE
C:: ... Ooo. COLO..
HENNING
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE VACAT ING THE EASEMENT IN THE NORTH ~6 FEET OF
LOT ~~. OXFORD HEIGHTS, SECOND FILING, ARAPAHOE COUNTY,
COLORADO.
WHEREAS. there present1y exists an easement ~n the
north 16 feet of Lot 11 , Oxford Heights, S e cond Fi1ing, 1ying
in the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 of Section 4, TSS, R68W, of the 6th P.M.,
Arapahoe County, Co1orado; and
WHEREAS, neither pub1ic necessity nor convenience
requires continued maintenance of this easement; and
WHEREAS, the P1anning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Eng1e~ood has heretofore recommended that the easement
be vacated, subject to the dedication of the north 30 feet
of the 8 foot uti1ity easement on the west 1ine of the
property described above; and
WHEREAS, said dedication has been made by deed
under date of March 27. 1 97 2.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLE WOOD, COLORADO, as fo~~o-s:
Section 1. That the fo11o~ng described ease~ent
1ocated within the City of Eng1ewood. Arapahoe County.
Co1orado. be and the same is hereby vacated. to-wit:
The north 16 feet of Lot 11. Oxford Heights.
Second Fi~ing, ~ying in the NE ~/4 SE ~/4 of
Section 4. TSS. R68W. of the 6th P.M .• Arapahoe
County. Co1orado.
Introduced. read in fu11 and passed on first reading
the 3rd day of A pri..1 197 2.
Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the
of A pri1 1972.
Attest::
ex~
I,
that the above
copy of a Bi~~
~972 .
6th day
• •
-
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCI~Wc;O:::.MAN==...:HENN==c:X:.oNG=----~.:..:..."'--....:.;~-C <Z>u
Ctry O F
A BILL FOR
·~GL.L -F1 L E -ceo. C oLo
AN ORDINANCE VACATING THE EASEMENT IN THE NORTH I 6 FEET OF
LOT I2. OXFORD HEIGHTS. SECOND FILING. ARAPAHOE COUNTY.
COLORADO .
WHEREAS, there present1y ex~sts an easement in the
north 16 fe et of Lot 12, Oxford Heights, Second Fi1Lng , Iy~ng ~n the NE I/4 SE I/4 of Sect~on 4. TSS. R68W. of the
6th P.M., Arapahoe County, Co1orado; and
WHEREAS , no pub1ic purpose ~11 be served by the
retention of che ease-ment; and
WHEREAS, the P1anni.n g and Zoning Co~ssion of the
City of Eng1ewood has heretofore recommended that the
easement be vacated.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. as foiio""''
Section 1. That the fo11o~ng described easement
1ocated ~thin the City of Eng1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado,
be and the same is hereby vacated, to-~t:
on the
The north 16 feet of Lot 12, Oxford Heights,
Second F1I1ng. Iy1ng 1n the NE I/4 SE I/4 of
Section 4, TSS, R68W, of the 6th P.M., Arapahoe
County, Co1orado.
Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first readLng
3rd day of Apr:i.1 1972.
day
of
Pub11.shed as a B1.11 for an Ordi.na.nce on the _G=t :;.h:._ __
Apri.1 1.972.
I,. Wi..11i.am L. McDi.vi.tt ,. do hereby certify
that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and comp1ete
copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced, read in fu1.1 and
passed on f~rst rea.d~ng on the 3rd day of April. • I972 •
. tf:1:f&:~~
•
• •
r 32x
\ I
=r
-
-
-
OFF I C I AC Clli:WJ COUNCIL ooc u~-,...,.... r..•., TO •9 •~"~1.
f-.:-:? 3 -2
C C OU f".!CtL • .:; FILE
ITY OF E N GLE".V OOO. C O L O .
INTRODU C E D AS A B ILL BY COUNCILMAN p ~
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 3, CHAPTER 2, TITLE V, OF THE
'69 E.M.C., ENTITLED "PAY PLAN" BY RELIEVING THE BOARD OF
CAREER SERVICE COMMISSIONERS FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF AN
ANNUAL RECOMMENDATION OF A PAY PLAN.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as fo~~o-s:
Section 1. That Section 5-2-3 of the Officia1 City
5-2-3: PAY PLAN
Repea.1ed
Section 2. That a11 Ordinances or parts of Ordinances
in conf1ict here~th are express1y repea1ed.
on the
day of
Introduced,
r-3~..£ day of
read in fu11 and passed on first reading GY+··L ~972.
Pub1i.shed as a. Bi.11 for an Ord:i.:nan.ce on the L,#
~ ~972.
I, k«~..s....n L . d e "~ -;-r , do hereby certify
that the above and forego:Lng i.s a true,. accurate and comp1ete
copy of a Bi.11 for an Ordi.nan.ce, i.ntrod_u.ced, read in fu11
and passed on first: reading on the .3~ day of aa ... ~" ~972. .. ·-~~
--
T 32X
•
CITY 0 F.F I.C 1 /' L
COU --~-t .. H lEN'Tj .:'
•
•
;a •
J !'l.U L"'j 1.7,. J...n72
~ewo~o. .;,~:1.ic.
n:i..s :r ~a.-
\
\ !
~
0 •
0 '9 ,i 0
-:. c.:F-r
' e r>~r
_e,.~ --. ::>
•
•
•
:.c 0
_, s
c
l. d~'f"P
r " co
•
........ ..,... .... r-rr., ~
~o=-c l.
:)r .. -os le· -;::, -...--( cr :i.e
cos +-o si ~-1-'"'l i~ --r~Er .
,::) rr_m --
• ' !
~
• •
•
Feb. 6 , 1.972
~o Th e C~ty 0 ~ E n ~l.ewood:
co .. Y..:..~L "le tne u..n.d ers :i.gaed. c:i.tiz e n.s §-~~~o f _7:oX:~""l.J!l li...l:t r ... n.g1eNood (Set'l....i..c
o1o . '-i e r e by obj ect to ny f o r:n o-r 1ow c"£~, .. ~:t:Jbi in to.:i.3 area..
~ve feel. tn i .s .. vo u.la. e defeA.ti..n ~ tn e }:oll..r.f..OS e of tr~.e oork-.o l.e Pro ·ra.:n ., g, Nou.lu.
"l.Ot U }.-t t r.:1.-e t .. e CO.l..l~l:Lt ..1. ."l.J..~··
•
• • •
'32
•
•
•
Cl"ry C~r; r: 1 c-A L
U"lE"'"l"""
ie .... ---:..::."":-::-....; .... -~~ .::::\.'t.--e~s ..: "t~.x.: ..... ;y e ~~ :--¥ _.:: .. .a:: .. e.::J t "1.-g l e 'Y c.O..a. e c .. _c ·.:._e.,)
_._.!.o . He-~e-.J,:, o . e~,.;.""L ":.o .... t.;;,r ~:>ro. ~:: d8{;. ~:::._ .O"\.,:t-£i. 1t"> _:"" .... tn.i -.&.r~
.e f~• t., i!!: .~ ...... .Lv ~ -e~e 't.-.. ~:;OF: I!!:.'R.,7::,'--&-.T• 3(:; ~IL'or..._ ...... ~~ ..... roe;r .Jl "!Q
." • ..:::: ..:.:1 -... o-:. \..li-r ... ::..t.--e e:~"U ....... .;.r:..!.."f"",., .:..r-:.. -. ............ -1-~!=Wooo.c 0
• •
,
-
O FFICIA L
C ITY C OU"' ... -·-'~"""'OC ,.,Ef".l"E
... J'TV'" ro:rs .:t. ___ .._ -·-.--s• l.9---o ....... G. .. , C'J' i.e
u ""'-=-''"'"~or o'£-o·7:4:os """ -O s.,.,.'"l __ :1.n ~-·.,.,.s r~n .
me ... _.."1'C:.reas
·-rzi:~ :~i6!-=< i --~! ;;_-;< ~i;~
• I
• I • • I
~
'· r .j,2 X I • ...:.. • ~
-----
•
•
:::.: 't:, n
-::. .---• ..,!.~!:"'
., O-.. e=-e -.. •
!'-~1 ~"":.:l.S
"1..0"'!;. :..4
..1.._-e~ it:i.ze .s t..
~-J•c~ to ~ J ~or ~
•
ld.>.rc h l.:>. l. 72
>-ICIA"L
• C UME-1'\l""
~ 14 ... t r..s v..... -r~ _ . ...-e t -,.._ J..e.Yoc:::. S,e .i..::! ~T ie~)
o:: 1 0CliC:>Q @. .:!..O :._'"';1 .... ~ ;..!"1 "!;;::..~ ::1.=-e :1 •
-r.. ... ~~-':Fo ..::a~QD ... /::r~JCat...l-.:..~o :r ....!1 ~1._l._ .Youla
~=============~===============================================================
~--~~------------------~--------~~--~~--~~~ • • \ !
'f
• •
0
e -e
l c :.c
•
•
•
•
.l..e-·oocl :
ders~-c.C: ci. i.zo ..... t==-L t ...... y-..-.·-ers o:1"' ·o::::""'1-!"" ... Y:est ~ ..... -:Le··oor,
c1.·). co .:...orr r.'.::" '9rec· o j.oct --o ,. ~1.· -"":)r of' 1.-.-.· cost o,s
\ .
~
• •
2X
•
•
•
M rca l.;;. l. 72
To ..., .. e '::ity 0 •1. ... le.YJO~;
e u.:"'!...::.ers i.,.; e.::.. cit.:i.ze _:s ~ ~ .. ·-;.> ,.J •:=-...s o£
1 ·t .Jrt .7test ~-.-J..e.~oc c:. ..Je :...i..:: Vie.'T)
r::o<!.~-~~re ..;~ o:....j~c~ -<:;o :1. o.J ~or ::o. o:? 1 CC':IIO Q;q@;i_ .::;.::::.~ W ;.!"1 "'!:.:':..!.._ .:l.r e:ll..
,_ ~:el.. -::~is .-Jo~l..':l. t~ :::.!!'!r-: ~t i""l.f; t-~"!!:~c:;!6~~"'0·•-l6rlc.!&.o l-.t. ro r~ ~-'l._l. Noul..a.
~o ~ u ~ ~r•~~ ~~ co ~, ~~~y ~~ ~~y ~ay •
--------------~---------------------------------------------------------------
• •
• •
I' 32X
•
•
•
Stan1ey H. Dia1
~ Ke11s Waggoner
•
INTIER..OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
~. STORM SEWER NE & NW ENGLEWOOD
DATE. Ap:r1.1 3 , 1972
Previous1y submitted was a time tab1e dated 2 /3 /71 £or drainage
~-provements in the NE & NW Eog1ewood Basins . This time tab1e
~s aow out o£ date £or severa1 reasons. One being that Denver
bas agreed to participate in that portion which goes through
their C ity. Another is that the Federa1 app1icatioo has taken
.1.on.cer than anticipated. .. :
4
-t ~
DenYer is about ready to enter into a contract with Se11ards
and Grigg ; Inc. 1or the engineering necessary ~or their portion.
In 1act. a meeting bas been schedu1ed to negotiate a price 1or
the contract. The part in Denver needs to be £ina1ized be£ore
Se11ards can comp1ete our £ioa1 p1ans and speci£ications.
BUD ~ reviewing the supp1emeota1 in1ormation tbat we submitted
and were supposed to 1et me know 1ast week whether there were
aay serious de1iciencies in the submitta1. Since they have not
ca11ed ~ can on1y assume that the quick review proved su11icient
aad that the co~p1ete in depth review has started_
As&uaing that we are 1unded by BUD and an agreement is signed;
tben. our scbedu1e 1or construction cou1d 1ook something 1~ke
tbe attached_
S:l.ocere1y.
---;-:--..;...c Z .:. c.e:.:_:;
Jte11.s Waggoner ~---
~rector o~ Pub1ic Works
lltW :pel
att •
(Continued)
•
• •
1'32X
•
No-o1 Days
0
1
15
35
40
45
46
53
60
70
75
BO
90
300-330
360
•
SCHEDULE FOR STOR:l.l SEWER
NE & NW BASIN
Action
Date Agreement is signed by BUD
Additiona1 appraisa1s requested
Detai1s o1 1unding con1irmed with Denver
Appraisa1 resu 1ts submitted to HUD
Negotiations 1or 1and acqu:i.sit:::i..oo started
Fioa1 p1ans and speci1ications comp1eted
Notice t o contractors
Second notice to contractors
Th~rd notice to contractors
Laud acqu~sition co~p1eted
Open bids
Review o1 bids and award contract
Contractor to start work
Contract work comp1eted -pro~ect in use
.Aud:l.t by BUD
Rev:l.sed 4 /3/72
(Continued ) • •
:. r 32 x
-
-
•
8:00 P~ M ..
•
AGENDA FOR
REGULAR CO NClL SESSION
APRIL 3, 1.972 ~ou . ·c:,_ r .._
Call to order, invocation by 1\-'lsgr .. Bernard c:JaftJij,~~6 Flt...E
Louis Catholic Church, pledge of allegiance led by Pack No. • C:OL:tt
5 ,. and roll call .
1.. 1\t.inut.es .
(a) Regular meeting of l\1arcb 20, 1972.. (Copies trans-
mitted berev..r-ith .. )
(b) Special meeting o( March 27 , 1972 .. (Copies trans-
:rnltted herewith.)
2.. Pre-scheduled citiz.e:ns and visitors.
(a) Recognition of .. special guests .. of t.he Council.
(b ) Mr .. Harold Ru..s"t., M-anager of the Englewood of_fice
o( the Public Ser ice Company, 9."111 be present to
present the fra.ncblse check.
(c) ~~i ~a;!:~e!~ :'~~~s:~~::t r~~~~~v~:e,
the Scenic VieY~.• area.
3 . Corn.municatlons -no action required .
(a) MlDut.es of the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting o"f March 7, 1972. (Copies transmitted
herew-ith .. )
(b) Mlnutes o£ the 'Workable Program Cit.l.z.en.s c o mmittee
meer.ing of March 23, 1972.. (Copies transmitted here-
with.)
(c) Report {rom Wm ... A. Hamilton, Fire Chief, and Del ~IcCarty. Training 0£Cicer .. on thet..r ~_endance at the
F ire J:)epa.rtment mstructor •s Conference in K ansas
City .. Missouri, on March 14-17, 1.972.. (Copies trans-
mitted herewith.)
(d) 1\'lemora.ndurn from ~1.r . Larry Thompson to Mr. Chas ..
B .. Carroll, Jr., Ulities Director,. reporting on his
attendance at the V\!a~r Pollution Control Federation
Conference held in v..·asbt.ngton . D. C . on March 14,
1972-(Copies transmitted hereW'ith-)
(e) Minutes o{ the v.·at.er and Sewer Board meeting of
!\1.arcb 21.,.. 1.972.. (Copies tra.nsmit:ted herewith.)
(f) 1\'li.nutes of the Board of Career Service Commissioners
meeting of 1\ta..rch 16, 1972-(Copies tra.nsmict..ed here-
with .)
4 . Communications -action recommended .
(a) Memorandtnn £rom Mr -Kells Waggoner, Dire~or of
Public Works . to Mr .. Stanley H .. Dial, City Manager,
regarding the protests beard at th e Paving District No ..
20 assessment hearing on Monday, March 27, 1972-
(Copies transmitted herewith .. )
(Continu ed) -..
r 32X
•
•
0~ -=;r ~ ..,._ ' ,._
k--P =-w -P1 ~ =-/
AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCYL SESStON
APRIL 3, 1.972
Page 2
4./ :~m::·::t•:sa:.d::::er::::::d:~ a~::~.:: vr~~ ~
the cosJ:s of Paving Oist:rtc·t No. 20. (Copies t:rans-
m ttt.ed herewith. )
5. City Attorney .
(a) Ordtnance on final reading vacating the South
Lillcoln Street/South Sbernlan Street alley south
o{ East Girard Avenue. (Copies previously trans-
mitted.)
(b) Ordinance on final reading revising Title XV o[ the
City Code re1ating to Water Operat.io ns. (Copies
previously transmitted. ) ./ _, ~ Bill for an Ordinance repealing Article 5-2-3 of the ~~
MuniCipal Code as it relates to .... the pay plan.. (Copies
transmitted h:erewitb .. ) ~ /' i!!!flli:~~-~b~~-=b<C
Bill for an Ordinance relating to pornography . (Copies V~~
transmitted herewi.th.) -~ e
(c)
........ (d)
Bill for an Ordinance va.catln.g a t.G• easement north
of the property at 4-005 South Jason Street. (Copi.es
~~
(g)
transmitted bereV~.'"ith. ) -
Bill for an Ordinance vacating a 1.6' easement north
of the property at 4000 South Jacon Street. (Copies
transmitted herev.rith.)
Resolution. authori.zln.g the execution of a contract for
the purchase of the "Lindner"" property for the Utilities
Department. (Copies transmitted herewith .. )
(h ) Resolution authoriZing the execution of a contract for
the purchase of 'the ''VJ'i'lson·· property for the Utilities
_____ __oepnrt:ment.. (Copies transmitted herew-ith .. )
(i) Report [rom the Ci.ty Attorney regarding the City's
regulations pertaining to signs painted on awnings
placed over City rights-of-way ..
(i) Attorney's choice ..
6. City Manager ..
Resolution authorizing the notice to sell bonds for
Paving District No. 2J. be published. (Copies of the
resolution and the bond pros~t:us transmitted here-
with .) -
~·~'
~
/
Memorandum £rom Chief Jack L. Clasby to ~'ir
Stanley H. Dial. City Manager. recom-Enending a
revision of the Municipal Code as it relates to age
limits of persons who may work in 3 .. 2 beer establish-
ments. (Copies transmitted herewith.)
(Contl.nu ed)
•
• •
•
•
•
•
AGENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCTL SESSION
APRIL 3. 1.972
Page 3
City ft.1._an.ager. (Coo.tin ued )
(c) Request co send a pollee officer to the Indiana Uni-
versity Center .for Criminal Justice (Police Fi_re-
ar-ms Instructor 's Course) M_ay 8 -12. 1972 ..
(d) Request to send two mechanics to the Snorkel Fire
Equlpment Company ln St. Joseph. Missouri . t..o a
training school on the maintenance of fire equipment:.
April 17 and 1 8 . 1.972.
(d) Report on the status of Federal aid application s :
(1) Rescue vehicle;
(2) Storm drainage projects; a.n.d.
(3) G r eenbelt Park/Northwest Engl ewood ..
(e) Manager's choice ..
7.. Recognition o.f non -scheduled cttizeos and visitors ..
8 . General discussion.
(a) 1\-t.ayor 's choice.
(b) Councilman's choice .
9. Adj ou.rn..ment ..
STANLEY H. DIAL
Cit:Y Manager
SHD/ij
•
• •
r 32xl
-
I
/
ROLL CALL
.....-., r 1 -__ _, ..?;
-
• -
C:t COl.J . 'C;IL ~ ~OF ENGLE -C FILE
ooo _ ccn .. o..
/
-
•
ROLL CALL
S c hwab
La
Cou.nc i.1-oma.n
Dh.or i.ty
Bro-m
Bl.ess :Lng
M.a. or Senti.
He..nni...n
•
• -
co,_,
C:JT-y QJ:" £. C...i... C. -p-ILE
OOU CCLCJ
• •
-
•
ROLL CALL
Schwab
a
Cou.nc: i .l..woma.n He.n..n:Ln____g_
•
0 -
Dhor i t
Brown
Bl.es.sLn .
Ma. or Sent1 ·~ _/ ___ -z-..__~ ....... .....__.~
OFFrcrAL c:'J"r.2 CO';r'CI_L f.?OC UMENT
C:O u· C..J•_ _ • .,._ FI LE
C:f'T'Y O F Ct·~GLr
-
• •
-
-
Schwab
La
Cou.n c i... 1 wo.ma.n Hen.n i.ng
Dhor i...t
Brown
B1.ess.i...n
MaVor Senti.
•
• ,. -
-
•
•
ROLL CALL
Schwab
La
Counc i 1woman Rennin
Dhorit
Br<»n>
B1essi..n
Mayor Senti.
7of.
•
• -
• •
-
ROLL CALL
Schwab
La
Cou.nc i.l.wom.a..n. He.nn:Ln.g
Dhor i.ty
Brown
Bl.essi.n.g
Ma._yor Senti.
-
0 ,. -
c::;y _ #~
~~/~ (/~
//----~
~--. /~·
•
0 -< ---
ROLL CALL
•
• • •
•
•
•
ROLL CALL
S c hwab
La
Counc i.1""'oma..n He.n..ni...n_g_
Dhor i.t
Bra>om
B1ess:Ln
Mayor Sent i.
•
0 -
7
• -~
•
-
•
•
ROLL CALL
Schwab
La
Counc i 1woman HennLng
Dhor ity
Brown
B1essi..ng
May·or Senti.
•
0 ,. -
• •
I' 32X
-
•
•
•
ROLL CALL
Schwab
La
Coun.c i1wotn.an
Dhor i.tv
Brown
B1essi....n
Mayor senti.
•
0 -
Hen.n:Ln.
• •
• T 32X
-
-
<'~ ~--z~......_-
/_J ~
/.
5 -
-~
-
ROLL CALL
Schwab
La
Counc i l.woman Hennin
Dhor i.tV
Bro wn
Bl.essi...n
M.a. or Senti...
-
0 -
\ !
'!
• •
I' 32X I
-
A-?-I /
~
~
~/
?~~
J /
•
ROLL CALL
Schwab
Lav
Counc i 1.w-otna.n.
Dhor i.t
Bre»<n
B1.essi.n
Ma or Sent i
•
• -
Henni...n
• •
• \ !
=r r 32x
•
• -
•
• c:Q7 • •
-----------~ /-
--~
• ..:. l'32X
-
CORRECTION
T .=-:= PFE::E:::tr.IG ..::-cc.:_·t. E -J;-C.::: E~."".l.'< F .=.,-4 .1.-TE ~-:·.,...:. ~ EEE.'I
FE t., ICF.CF""L.".-E~ ;-;:; ,..: SSi-'F.E LEGlElLJT'...r ..-!." :::;
ITS !J"f.;/.....=, GE ~.=.:=~.::;s J~ttl.t.TEDI..-4 TE.!... Y 1-:'E.=i.E ... -.!..=TE.=:.
II
•
___!_e_.o
j/
~-/
~
-Le
/·/
?.-~
b 4_
ROLL CALL
Schwab
Lay
Counc i.1wo.m.a.n
Dhor i.ty
Brown
B1essi...n
Ma or Senti.
•
• -
Hen.ni..n
c.;c..---c..c-------e& --
/
•
• -
ROLL CALL
\:~~~~~~~~~~S~c~h~wiabi;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' Lay .-,,,::; lJ•
Counci1woman Hennin O F £
Dhor ity
Bro'WTl
Bl.essi...n
Ma or Senti.
2
_./ :;?!:-~ ~~
/ -=-_;:/ ~-/ ~ ~ II • •
~ ._.; _ ...... ~ /-~ 2:.
./
'~ --:?-' ~-
/
-
-
•
•
ROLL CALL
Schwab
La
CouncJ..l.woD\a.n He..nni...n.___9_
Dhor 1.~
Br.,...,
Bl.es.si...n
Ma or Senti.
•
• -
II . •
-
-
•
0 ,. -
ROLL CALL
cr~o u l ~~~~~~~~~~~~~iii!~~~~~~~=l~~~~~~~::~OF ~JC . -
~:h-ab .I_£ .. • ... coo. c.;za..
Counci1woman Henn in
Dhor i t
Br<nom
B1ess:LnQ
Mayor Sent i
/V
<>'"~~~
•
0 -
--/~
ROLL CALL
<=n-y c?,[; ':;!,c 1 At.:'
-,.....OCI.JMEJ\rr
;J 7'>
/
•
•
0 -
ROLL CALL
•
• • •
•
0 -
ROLL CALL
•
• ,_-o __L r • •
•
\ I
r 32x
•
•
•
0 -
cou~
C ITY OF -\~~~ Cf'..ccc-.
000
L E Schwab • COL..Q..
Lav
Coun.c 1.. ~woman Henn .LilCr
Oh.or i.t
Br"'""'
Bl.essi...nq
Ma or Senti.
/ -~· ~~
~;:;. /.~
-?c /
/1 7
•
• •
T 32X
•
•
•
0 -
C~F F-< A L
T
l~~~::hw~ab ~c~0~;. -'--
counc L1woman HennLn
Dhori.t"V
Brown
B1essLn
Mayor Senti ~/JZ--./
• •
• -
0 .. -
ROLL CALL
2
<::our ll ~~~~~~~~ii~~~~~~~~~~~~~C/Ty O ~.._ ._ -
Schwab C:. GLE\>..-Qo _. FIL E
La D. Ce>t..o _
Counci1woman HennLnq
Dhor ity
Brown
B1essi..n
Ma or Senti.
-~-
•
• -. •
r 32xl
• -
0 -
ROLL CALL
)
•
• •
• • r 32x
-
•
•
•
0 ,. -
ROLL CALL
C7'ry c:~{'; !=" f C: f A L
CtL roooc u M~N'T
Schwab
La --Cou.nci.l.woma.n He.n.ni...OO -~
Dho:r i.ty
Br<»<n
Bl.essi..n
Ma or Sent i
~~~
~L~-~~
~~ ----~ 2-~~
~ /c~~~-
j,~
~~=:..-----. /
~/
=--/7 .......:: ~ ~ ~·~~~~~_/
~.y ~
~-•
• _______ ......, ________ ;;..;..;~..;.1_....;;.._~~~'-32 X I
•
•
•
• -
ROLL CALL
CT7Y c~G ~I C: I A t::
.L. o ocu M~
Schwab ~Lay ~~C• Counc i.l..wom.a.n Henn :Ln_g C..F L.:
Dhor i..t
Brown
B1essi..n
Ma or Sent i
~;-r /~~
---c::2--..._
2
~~~-?
~~~~
~~
~~~ -. •
'32 x
•
• -
ROLL CALL
•
•
•
2 c._/
• \ !
~
• •
I' 32X
-
-
-
• ,. -
ROLL CALL
c ~-~
.__-~~ /~
-•
--
r 32x
•
-
ROLL CALL
• -<P
/~. ~/~
p-~
~?f ~r~
• --~,_,.._z::-_ __ ~ .... II • •
~/L/y ----_;;_ _____ ..o
r
•
• t • -
-
ROLL CALL
•
• • •,
• • '32x
-
-
-
0 -
RC>LL CALL
Schwab
La
Counci.l...woma...n He.n.ni..n
/
a /..,8 ~
Dhor i.t
Brown
B.l.essi..nQ
MaYor Senti.
~/&-1 //__)
/_) ;;;:~
/~ /
~-
~·~
a ~._-.s::-~~~ ./ .... ~--~.~A
""~~~£'
--J
1'32 X
-
•
•
l r ...~
•
0 -
ROLL CALL
I--------~------~~~~~~Yh~w~ab~------------~~-::~~~~~------1c~O~~
Counc i.l.woman He..n..n i..ng /
Dhor i t_y
B r own
Bl.essi.n
M.a. or Sent i.
(
--__;;;IJ--z...<~_.c._....-.,-_____
~
~
~~--.------------------------~_·.---------.--.---~~----~.~~
• •
•
• -
ROLL CALL
-~ ?2>
•
• • •
• I' 32X I [
~---""""" ............................ __ ....; __ ..;;...__,......,_~~~·· ~---______.
--• .. -
-
3 /
• •,
-T 32X
s(c J
---1 -
-
-c<---~
-
ROLL CALL
Schwab
La
Counc 1 1-oman BennLnq
Dhor i..t:V
Br"""'
B1essLn
Ma or Sent i
-
0 -
--
'32x
-
•
•
ROLL CALL
counc i.1W'oma.n
Dhor i.t
Bro-om
B1essi...n
M..a or Senti.
•
0 -
c:r;;o.u ,.~...... _
or E:f\.·GL..c:=.,.,o ....:. F"''-e
~~~~~hwab~~Henn~L» ~~ 00
-7·C::ot..o. ~·
~~z~~ ;z
•
, ,
~~~ ~/~
• •
•
•
/
/-' l
•
ROLL CALL
-<....A?'
•
0 ,. -
• •
T 32X
-
-
•
•
ROLL CALL
Sch-ab
La
Counc~1woman HennLn
Dhor i.t
Br<»=
B1essi..n.g
Ma or Senti
•
• -
~~~ 6 -~~~
.--/&C~ .. " .•. ~
~ ~ _:/ .;4
.,;;;;/-c:}JY' ~
V'._:-/-Lif -/ ~
•
_L~
~
~___..~-c:...-;_c
•
• •
~'32 x l
• -• t • -
•
• • •
• • r 32x
•
• -
ROLL CALL
~ /% v -:~
·/
-· 1
~-<:.-<.:--..!
/ ;/ "? L-4 ~ --.____/
•
• • •
T 32X
-
•
ROLL CALL
Sch-ab
La
Cou.nc i.1-aman
Dhor i.t
Br<»=
B1essi.n
M.a or Sent i..
-
• <• -
Henn:i...n
• •
-
• -
ROLL CALL
-
---
~~<-,-------"32x
-
-
-
-
ROLL CALL
Schwab
La
Counc i 1woman HennLn
Dhor it
Brown
B1essi.ng
Mayor Senti
-
0 -
~~ --~ ~
/o / .L.:,A ~ ~~
~ /J ?"___,. ?~· 9 o 7'~.
~
• •
I' 32 X
•
•
~-
u 1--/6-
~~
ROLL CALL
Sch...,ab
La
Counc i 1woman Henn~
Dh.or i t
Brow-n
B1essLn
Ma o r S enti.
~--_..:::::.
-z; { c!-L
/ ~~ /./ ---~
~ /~ ~ _...,.,
--~'
•
•
• t • -
/· / -~
L-6~ -L..E>
~ ~-
.,. --. • •
~ ~
/*""'
:..-.&'
T
•
• -
ROLL CALL
•
•
•
\ !
~
• •
r 32x
• -• -
ROLL CALL
\~~/~-~~~~~~~-~i11~~~~~~=~1~·n ~/~-~~ Ohor 1.t
Brown __..
B1essing ,
Ma. or senti.. ....,......
•
• • •
• 1'32X
•
•
•
• -
ROLL CALL
~O u ·.
O F Lr
~~ ·~-~ Schwab
Lay_
Counci1woman HennLnq
Dhorit
Bro wn
B1essi..ng
M.a or Sent i
~-/ ~ ~::__..._~~-~
~ ~ y ~ ,..._~...,~~_...,-
?) -~~~/ / 1 '9
/~ c....~-..__-.4._1' /"'
/::T~~~~
~
• •
• •
r
)
•
•
•
•
0 -
ROLL CALL
~f ~/: ~ ~
--"--=--.. / ~ 4 :. s-o c::::f
_...,__..__
~~
?----/~~
£"--/
•
• •
T 32 X
-
-
• ;#~-/
•
•
ROLL CALL
Schwab
La
Counci.l..'W'Oma.n H.e.nn:Ln
Dhori.ty
Brown
Bl..essi...og
M.a or Senti.
/
•
0 -
II • •
~~>
~ ... ~ ~~
• r 32xl
-
-
•
•
•
•
• -
Schwab ___.
Lay -
Counc i.1-ama.n Ben.n · ---
Dhor it
Bro..n
B1essi..n
Mayor Sent i
..
• •
• ,32X (
-
•
•
ROLL CALL
Sch-ab
La
Dh.or1.t
Br~
B1essi..n
Ma or Senti
•
0 -
~ C:cgG f.:_ I C I A L
--u '\lfENT
• .,
-
-
-
r
-
.J
/
-
0 -
ROLL CALL
S c hwab ~
Lay --
Cou.nc 1.1wonaa..n Be..n.n~ ----
Dhor L t
Bro-n
Bl.essLn
Mayor Sent i -
.. -
c:-~ c~G r-1 c ' A L
-uME"~
c....;
-:-~-----
•
--J
T 32X
/
-
1:
I-
I-
'=-
/"
ROLL CALL
Schwab
La
Cou.ncl..1wo ~~ty .ma..n He.n..ni.t.:!.51..
:!essi...nq-
or Senti
-
0 -
,_~ /
~
~ "J
_/
' > cor-L /7 /~
--
----
ROLL CALL
-
---
-• . ' I' 32X I
-
-
•
•
•
• ,. -
ROLL CALL
LJ-/_;? ~---~
•
~~,~~~
&-/~~~
~~rs~72'
//.'06
• •
T 32X
• -
•
•
0 -
••sPECIAL CITI ZEN PROGRAM INVITEES, Apr i l 3 , 1972••
Precinct No ..
M r.
Mr.
Mr.
L
and Mr s .
and Hr s .
and Mr s .
Precinct No .. 2
Mr. and Mr s .
Mr. and Mr s .
Mr. and Mr s .
Precinct No . 3
M _r .. and Mr s .
Mr. and Hr s ..
Mr. and Mr s .
Precinct No. 4
Mr. and M rs ..
M.r .. and Mr s ..
Mr. and Mr s .
Prec i.nct No. 5
Mr. and Hr s .
Mr. and Hr s .
Mr. and M.r s .
Precinct No . 6
Mr. and Mr s .
Mr. and Mr s .
H·r. and Mr s .
Preci.nct No. 7
Mr . and Mr s .
Mr. and Hr .s .
Mr. and Mr s ..
Precinct No. 8
Mr. and Mr s ..
Mr. and Mr s •
Mr. .and Hr s .
~ c~f: .. F t,c-I A L
f 1..1'>1
Cou·
LeRoy R . Hayes,. 2218 We st. Harvard A~ o F ...... z;.i':;c;.:_.-:-.-
Perry L e -is , 2349 W est Harvard Avenue ._ ·"'Oc
William H . Olsen , 2193 West Iliff Avenue
John D. Rari.don, 2814 South Cherokee Street
C ha rles E . Hiller, 3159 South A coma. Street
John Le" M itchell , 3101 South Elati Street
J ame s Dot son , 2910 South Sherm.an Street
John Dre.ssman , 2891 South Logan Street
Darrell Hat-an , 2936 South Lincoln Street
Donal-d D. Salter, 3700 South Delaware Street
Donald L. Sander.sfeld , 3827 South I._nc.a Street
Johnny Sanderson , 4065 South El.ati. Street
w. A. Moody , 2900 South C1arkson Street
Le" Sa1azar , 3266 South Logan Street
Arthur 0. Sale, 3126 South Logan Street
John D. Salzman, 3445 South Do-ni.ng Street
Ru e ben Sa.nti.stevan , 3335 South Emerson Street
K ent D. Dou-n.ay, 2910 South Hari.on Street
Ceorge R. Sandage , 3171 South Wi.11i.am.s Street
Carl H . Sartori.us , 3466 South R.ce Street
H .llton Horens Lein , 3470 South Race Street
Kenneth A. Rappe, 3335 South Clarkson Street
David Redeker, 3447 South Sherman Street
Arthur L l.oyd Reed, 3 412 South Logan Street
•
0
• •
T 32X
•
0 -
Pa ge 2 -Apr il 3 ~ 1972 Counci1 1nvltees
Precinc. t No . 9
Hr . and Mr s . Patri.ck T . Donohoe., 0 7 South Clarkson Street:.
H r . and Mr s . Allen R . Do r an , 3861 South Sherman Street
Mr. and Mr s . Larry P. Dot..y, 3770 South Sherman Street
Precinct No . 10
Hr . and Mr s . F rances Sandmeyer , ~1._75 South Inca Street
Mr. and Mr s . J o hn M . Sanger, 4100 South Bannock Street
Hr. and Mr s . Ivan R . Dransfeldt, 41.50 South Huron Courc.
Precinct 11
Mr. and Mr s . Carl R ehn , 4152 South Logan Street
Mr . and Mr s . Clay ton H. Salter, 4298 South Logan Street
Hr. and Mr s . Merwyn R. Sand s ted, 4119 SouLh Sherman Street
Precinct No . 12
Hr. and Mr s . Arthur G . Davis, 1030 West Stanford Place
Mr . and Mrs . Wayne c . Oetken , 4415 South Acoma Street
Mr. and Mr s . Don Severs , 4545 South Acoma Street
P recinct 13
Mr. and Mr s . Ronald Sand s , 2921 West Saratoga Avenu e
Mr. and Mr s . Richard Domier, 31.68 West Chenango Aveune
Mr. and Mr s . John L. Dorl.ac,. Jr .,. 4685 South Irving Street
Precinct No . 14
Mr. and Mr s . Sylvester E. Reynolds,. 4995 Sou t.h Inca Street
Mr. and Mr s . Donald w. Harper , 4930 South El.ati Street
Mr. and Mr s . Wil.liam E. HoLdsworth ,. 4932 Sout:h Galapago Street
Precinc t 15
• Mr. and Mr s . Rob rt Renz,. 4765 South Bannock Streec
Mr . and Mrs . Kenneth L . SabJ.n ,. 4754 South Huron Street
Mr. and Mr s . Steven H . Sanborn, 47 33 Souc.h Bannock Sc.:eet
Precinct 16
Mr . and Mr s . Charl. s H . Sanders , 491.1. South Wa shington Street • Mr. and Mr s . Robert J . Di.sher , 49 9 South Logan Street • • Mr. and Mr s . J ohn Saunders ,. 4936 South Grant Street
T 32XI
\ ! ;.
• -
0 -
••sPEC1AL CITIZEN PR<X;RAH INVITEES , April 3 , 1972""
Precinct No .
Hr. and Mrs. LeRoy R. Hayes, 2218 We st Harvard Avenue
HT-and Mr s ~ Perry Lewi s ,. 2349 We st Harvard Avenue
Hr. and Mr s . W i.lli.am H. Olsen, 2193 West Iliff Avenue
Prec.i..nct No. 2
Mr. and Mrs. John D. Rar i.don,. 2814 South Cherokee Street
Mr. and Hr.s .. C harLe s E. HiLler, 3159 South Acoma Street
Hr. and Mr s . John L -ee H .i. tchell, 3101 South El.ati Street
Precinct No. 3
Mr. and Mr s. James Dotson, 2910 South Sherman Street
HT. and Mrs . John Dre.ssma.n, 2891 South Logan Street
Hr . and Mr s. DarreLl. Ha~an, 2936 South Lincoln Street
Precinct No. 4
Mr. and Mr s . Donald D. Salter, 3700 South Delaware Street
Hr. and Mr s. Donal.d L. Sander.sfeld, 3827 South Inca Street
Hr. and Mr s .. Johnny Sanderson, 4065 South Elati Street
Precinct No. 5
Mr. and Mr s . w. A. Moody, 2900 South Clarkson Street
Mr. and M _rs .. Lee Salazar,. 3266 South Logan Street
Mr. and Mrs. Arthur o. Sa1e,. 3126 South Logan Street
Precinct No. 6
Hr. and Mr s. John D. Sa1zman,. 344.5 South Downing Street
Hr. and Mr s . Ru e ben Santistevan,. 3335 South E.merson Street
Kr. and Mrs . Kent D. Dounay,. 291.0 South Mar1o:n Street
Prec.:Lnc.t No . 7
• Mr • and Mr s . G eorge R. Sandage,. 3171 South Wi11iams Street
Mr. and Mrs. Car1 H. Sartor ius ,. 3466 South Race Street
Hr. and Mr s . Mil. ton Horenstein,. 3470 South Race Street
Precinct No. 8 .. .,_ and Mr s -Kenneth A. Rappe,. 333.5 South C1ark.son Street
• Hr. and Mrs . Davi.d Redeker,. 3447 South Sherm.a:n. Street • • HT • and H _r s . Arthur Ll.oyd Reed,. 3412 South Logan Street
•
•
0 -
P age 2 -A pril 3 , 1972 Counc~l 1nvlt es
Precinct N o . 9
Hr. and Mr s . Patr ick T . Donoho -o 7 Sout..h Cl ark~ on Stree l:.
Hr. and Mr s . Allen R. Doran ,. 3 &l South Sherman Street
H r . and Mr s . Larry P. Do~y , 3'"'-o South Sh rm.an Stree t
Pr ecinct 10
H r . and Mr s . F rances Sandmey r , 41 75 .souc..h 1nca Street
H r . and Hr John H. Sang r , 4100 South Bannock Street
Mr . and Mr s . Ivan R . Dra..n sfeldL ,. 4150 South Huron Court
Precinct No. 11
Mr. and Mr s . Carl R hn , 4152 South Logan Street
Mr . and Mr s . Clayt:.on ... Sal.ter ,. 4298 Sou t.h Logan Street
Hr. and !"''r s . M r"')'n R. Sand s ted ,. 41.19 South Sherman Street
Precinct No . 12
Mr. and Hr s . Arthur G . Davi.s ,. l030 We s t Stanford Place
Mr. and Hr s . Wayne c . Oetken, 4415 South Acoma Street
Mr . and Mr s . D o n Severs , 4545 South Acoma Street
Precinct 13
Mr . and Mr s . R o nald Sand s , 2921 We s t Saratoga Avenue
Mr . and Mr s . Richard Domie r,. 3168 W est: C hen ango Aveune
Mr. and Mr s . John L . Dorlac.,. Jr .,. 4685 South Irving Street
Precinct No . 1 4
Hr. and Mr s . Sylvester E. Rey nold s , 4995 South Inca Street
Mr. and Mr s . Donal.d w. Harper , 4930 Soueh E1ati Street
Mr . and Mr s . William E. Hol.ds'WOrth , 4932 Sou t.h Ga1apago Street
Precinct 15
Mr . and Mr s . Robert Renz , 4765 South Bannock Street
Mr. and Mr s . K enneth L . Sabi.n , 4 7 54 Sout-h Huron Street
Mr . and Hr .s . Steven H . Sanborn , 4733 South Bannoek Ste:eet
Pr ecinct No . 1&
Mr . and Mr s . CharLe s H . Sanders , 4911 Sou t.h Wa s hington Street
Mr . and Mr s . R o bert J . Di s her, 49 9 South Logan St:.reet
Mr. and Mr s . John S a under s , 4936 South Grant Street
•
\ !
'!'
• •
r 32x
• -
0 -
••sPEC1AL CITIZEN PROGRAM INVITEES, Apri.l 3, 19 7 2""
P ·"reci.nct No. 1
Hr. and Mr s . L -e Roy R. Haye s , 2218 We st Harvard Avenue
Hr. and Mrs. Perry Le.~is, 2349 We st Harvard Avenue
Hr. and Mr s . W il.li.am H. OLsen, 2193 West Il.i.ff Avenue
Precinct No. 2
H _r. and Mr s . John D. Ra.ridon, 2814 South Cherokee Street
Hr. and Mr s . C harles E. H.ill.er, 3159 South Acoma Street
Hr. and H·rs . Joh.n Lee Mi tchell., 31.01 South Elati Street
Precinct No. 3
Hr. and Mr s . Jame s Dotson, 2910 South Sherm.an Street
Hr. and Mr s .. J ohn Dres s man, 2891 South Logan Street
Hr .. and Mrs .. Darrell Hat'W&n, 2936 South Li.nc.oln Street
Preci.nct No. 4
Hr. and Mrs .. Donald D. Salter, 3700 South Delaware Street
Mr .. and Mr s . Donald L. Sander.sfeld, 3827 South Inca Street
Hr. and Mr s . Johnny Sanderson, 4065 South Elati. Street
Precinct No . 5
Hr. and Mr s . w. A . Moody, 2900 Souc.h Clarkson Street
Mr. and M rs. L•• Sa1a..z.ar., 3266 South Logan Street
Hr. and Hr s .. Arthur o . Sa I.e. 3126 South Logan Street
Precinct No. 6
Hr. and Mrs. John D. Sal.zm.an., 34-45 South Downing Street
Mr. and Mr s . Rue ben Santistevan . 3335 South Emerson Street
Hr. and Mr s . Kent D. Oounay. 291.0 South H.arl.on Street
Precinct No • 7
• Hr. and Mr s . George R. Sandage . 31.71. South Wi.l.l.i.am.s Street
Mr. and Hr s . Carl. H. Sartorius. 3466 South Race Street
Hr. and Mr s . M il. ton Horenstein. 3470 South Race Street
Precinct No. 8
Mr. and Mr s. Kenneth A. Rappe., 3335 South C1arkson. Street • Hr. and Mr s . David Redeker. 3447 South Sherman Street • • Mr. and Mr s .. Arthur Lloyd Reed., 3412 South L·ogan Street
• r 32x
-
-
-
-
-
0 ,. -
Pa ge 2 -A pril 3 , 19 72 Council 1nvite s
Precinct No . 9
Hr. and H cs . Patrick T . Donohoe, 4087 South Clarkson Street
Hr . and Mrs. All en R . Doran, 3861. South Sherman Stree t
Hr. and Mrs . Larry P . Dot:.y, 3770 South Sherman Street
Pr ecinct No . 10
Hr . and Mr s . Frances Sandmeyer , 41 75 South Inca Street
Hr. and Mrs. John H. Sanger , 4100 South Bannock Street
Mr. and Mr s . 1van R . Drans fe ld t .,. 4150 South Huron Court
Precinct No . 11
Mr. and Mr s . Carl. Rehn., 4152 South Logan Street
Mr . and Mrs . Clay ton M. Sal.ter, 4298 South Logan Street
Hr . and Mr s . M erwyn R . Sand s ted, 4119 South Sherman Street
Precinct 12
Mr. and Mr s . Arthur G . Davis, 1030 We st S ta_nford Pl.ace
Mr . and Mrs . Wayne c . Oetken , 4415 South Acoma Street
Mr . and Mr s . Don Severs, 4545 South Acoma Street
Precinct 13
Mr . and Mr s . Ronald Sands , 2921 West S a ratoga A venue
Mr . and Mr s . Ri chard Domier , 3168 West Chenango Aveune
Hr . and Mr s . John L . Dorl.ac , Jr .' 4685 Sou th 'Irvi.ng Street
Precinct No . 14
Mr. and Mrs . Sylvester E. Reynolds, 4995 South Inca Street
Hr. and Mrs. Donald w. Harper, 4930 South E~•tL Street
Mr. and Hr s . William E. Ho1dsworth, 4932 South G a1apago Street
Precinct No. 15
Mr. and Mr s . R obert Renz, 4765 South Bannock Street
Mr. and Mr s . Kenneth L. Sabin , 4 75 4 South Huron Street
Mr. and Mr s . Steven H . Sanborn, 4733 South Bannock St~eet
Precinct No . 1.6
Mr . and Mr s . Charles H. Sanders, 4911 South Washington Street
Mr. and Mrs . Robert J . Disher , 4989 South Logan Street
Hr . and Mrs. John Saunders , 4936 South Gr"B-nt Street
•
\ !
'!
--
I' 32 X I
•
0 ,. -
••sPEC1AL C1T1 ZE PROGRAM INVITEES, Apri.l 3 , 1972 ..
Preci.nc~ No. ~
Hr. and Mr s. LeRoy R. Hayes, 2218 We st Harvard Avenue
Hr. and Mr s . Perry Lewi..s, 2349 West Harvard Avenue
Hr. and Mr s . Will.iam H. Ol sen , 2193 West Iliff Avenue
Precinct No. 2
Hr-and Mr s . John D. Rari.don, 2814 South Cherokee Street
Hr. and Mr s . Charles E. M.iller, 3159 Sout:.h A coma Street
Hr. and Mr s . John Lee H itc.hel.l., 3101 South El.ati Street
PrecJ.nct No. 3
Mr. and Mr s . James Dots on, 2910 South Sherman Street
Mr. and Mrs . John Dressman, 2891 Sout:-h Logan Street
Mr. and Mr s . Darrel.l Hatwan, 2936 South Li.nc.ol.n St:.reet
Prec.J.nct No. 4
K .r. and Mr s . Donald D. Salter, 3700 South Delaware Street
Mr. and Mr s . Donald L. Sandersfeld, 3827 South Inca Street
Hr. and Mr s . Johnny Sanderson, 4065 Soue-h Elati. Street
Precinct No. 5
Hr . and Mr s . w. A. Moody , 2900 South CLarkson Street
Hr. and Mr s . Lee Sal.az.ar, 3266 South Logan Street
Hr. and Mrs. Arthur 0 . Sal.e, 3126 South Logan Street
Prec.i.nc;.t No. 6
Mr. and Hr s .. John D. Salzman, 3445 South Oowni.n.g Street
Hr. and Mr s .. Rue ben Santi.s tevan, 3335 South Emerson Street
Hr. and Mr s .. Kent:. D. Dounay, 2910 South HarJ..on Street
Precinct No • 7
Mr. and Mr s .. George R . Sandage, 31.71 South W:i.ll.i.am..s Street
Mr. and Hr .s .. Carl. H. Sartorius, 3466 South Race Street
Mr. and Mr s . Hil ton Horenstein, 3470 South Race St:.reet
•
Precinct No. 8
• Mr • and Mrs . Kenneth A. Rappe, 3335 South CLarkson Street
Mr. and Hr s . David Redeker, 3447 South Sherman Streec.
Hr. and Mr s .. Arthur Lloyd Reed, 3412 South Logan Street
• •
)
\ 1
~
• •
I' 32X
-
•
•
•
•
• -
Page 2 -April 3 , 19 7 2 Co unci1 1nv.iLe s
Precinct No. 9
H r . and Mrs. Patrick T . Donoho 40 7 South C1arkson Street
H r . and Mrs . Allen R . Doran, 3 61 Souch She-cm.an Street
Hr. and Mr s . Larry P . Ootyy 3 7 70 South Sherman Street
Precinct No . 10
H r . and Mr .s . France-, Sandmeyer , 41 7 5 South I-nca Street
Hr. and Mrs . J o hn H. Sang r , 4100 South Bannock Street
Hr . and Mrs . Ivan R . Oransfeldt , 4150 South Huron Court
Precinct No . 1 1
Mr. and Mr s . Car1 Rehn , 4152 South Logan Street
Hr . and Mrs . Clayton H. Sa1ter,. 4298 South Logan Street
Hr . and Mrs . H r"')'n R . sands ted, 4119 Sout.h Sherman Stre@.t
Precinct No . 12
Hr. and Mr s . Arthur G . Davis, 1030 West Stanford Place
Hr . and Mr s . Wayne c . Oetken , 4415 South Acoma Street
Hr . and Mrs . Don Severs , 4545 South Acoma Str@.et
Precinct No . 13
Hr . and Mr s . Ronald Sands , 2921 We s t Saratoga A venue
Hr. and Mr s . Richard Dom.ier, 31b West Chenango Aveune
H r . and Mrs . John L. Dorl.ac , Jr., 4685 South Irving Str@.et
Precin ct No . 14
Hr. and Mrs . Sylvester E. Reynolds, 4995 South Inca Street
Mr . and Mrs . Oona1d W . Harper, 4930 South Elati Street
Mr. and Mrs . Will1am E . Ho1dsworth , 4932 South Ga1apago Street
Precinct No . 15
Hr. and Mr s . Robert Renz , 4765 South Bannock Street
Mr. and Mr s . Kenneth L . Sabin, 4 754 South Huron Stree t
Mr. and Mrs . Steven H . Sanborn, 4733 South Bannock St:eet
Precinct No . 16
Mr. and Mr s . Char1es H . Sanders, 4911 South Washington Street
Mr. and Mr s . Robert J. Di s her, 4989 South Logan Street
Mr. and Mr s . John Saunders , 4936 South G r ~nt Street
•
• •
r 32 x
• -
0 -
....
••sPECIAL C1T1ZEN PROGRA.H I.NVITEES, Apr il. 3 , 1.97 2••
Precinct No.
Hr. and Mrs . L e R oy R. H ay e s , 221.8 We s t Harvard Avenue
Hr. and Mr s . P e rry L e w "i..s , 2349 We st Harvard Avenue
Mr. and H rs . W il.l.i.am H. OLsen, 21.9 3 Wes t Iliff Avenue
Prec i nct No. 2
Mr. and Mr s . John D-Ra ridon, 2 8 14 South Cherokee Street
Mr. and Hr s . C ha r l es E. H iller, 3 1 5 9 South Acoma Street
Mr. and Mr s . John Le e H .i t c h el.l., 3 1.01 South El.ati. Street
Precinct No. 3
Mr. and Mr s .. James Dot.s o ·n, 2910 South Sherman Street
Hr. and Mr s . John Dr e.ssm.an, 289 1. Souch Logan Street
Mr. and Mr s . Darrel l Ha twan. 2 936 South Lincol.n Street
Precinct No. 4
Hr. and Mr s .. Don a ld D. Sa l ter, 37 0 0 South Delaware Street
Mr. and Mr s . Donald L. Sander s feld, 382 7 South Inca Street
Mr. and Mr s . J ohn n y Sander s on, 4065 South El.ati. Street
Precinct No. 5
Mr. and Mr s . w. A. Moody, 2900 South Cl.arkson Street
Mr. and Mr s . Lee Salazar, 3266 South Logan Street
Mr. and Mr s . Arthur o. Sale, 3126 South Logan Street
Precinct No. 6
Mr. and Mr s . John D . Sa l zma n , 344 5 South Down.i.n .g Street
Mr. and Mrs . R ue ben Santi.st.evan,. 333 5 South Emerson Street
Hr. a nd Mr s . K ent D . D o u nay , 29 1 0 S outb H.ari.on Street
Precinct No • 7
• Mr. and Mr s . C eorge R. S and age, 3 1 7 1 South Will.iam.s Street
Mr. and Mr s . Carl H. Sarto r i u s , 3 466 South Race Street
Mr. and Mr s . H il t on H o r e n s te i n,. 3 4 7 0 South Race Street
Precinct No . 8
• Mr. and Mr s . Kenne th A • Rappe, 3335 South Clarkson Street
Mr. and Mr s . David Redeker, 3447 South Sherman Street
Mr. and Mr s . Arthur Lloyd Reed, 3412 South Logan Street • •
• •
•
-
-
0 -
Pag 2 -Apr il 3 , 1972 Co un 11 Lnvl~ e~
Precinct No . "
Hr. and Mr s . P a tri ck T . Dono h oe , 408 7 South Clarkson Sr:.reet Mr. and Mrs . Allen R . Doran , 3861 South Sherman S t.reet Mr. and Mrs . Larry P. Doty, 3770 South Sherman Street
P reci n ct No . 10
Mr . and M rs. Franc Sandm.eyt!!.r , 41'"'5 South Inca Street Mr. and Mrs . John M. San .,r, .t.lOO South Bannock Street Mr. and Hr.s . I an R . Dran.s £eldt, -150 South Huron Court:.
Precinct 11
Prec inct
Mr . and Mrs . Carl Rehn, 4152 South Logan Street Mr . and Mr s . Clay ton H . Sa1ter, -29 SouL.h Logan Street: Mr. and Mr s . Merwyn R. Send s ted,. -119 South Sherman Street
No . 12
Mr . and Mrs . Arthur C . Davis, 1030 West Stanford Pl ace
Mr. and Mr s . Wayn C . Oetken , ~415 South A coma Street
Mr . and Mr s . Don Severs , 4545 South A coma Street
13
Mr . and Mrs . Ronald Sands , 2921 West Sara t oga Avenu e
Mr . and Mrs . Richard Dom~er, 316 West Chenango Aveune
Mr. and Mrs . John L . Dorlac , Jr ., 4685 South Irving Street
Precinct No . 14
Mr. and Mr s . Sylvester E. Reynolds , ~995 South Inca Street
Mr . and Mr s . Donald w. Harper, ~930 South Elati Stre t
Hr . and Mr s . William E . Holdsworth, 4932 South Galapago Street
Precinct: No . 15
Mr . and Mr s . Robert Renz, 4765 South Bannock Street
Mr . and Mr s . Kenneth L . Sabin , 4754 South Huron S tree t
Hr. and Mr s . Steven H . Sanborn, 4733 Sou th B annock St~eet
Precinct No . 16
Hr. and Mr s . Charles H . Sanders , 4911 South Wa shington Street
Mr . and Mr s . Robert J . D ishe r, 4 989 South Logan Street
Mr . and Mr s . John Saund ers , 4936 South Grant Street -•
-
0 -
'"SPECI.AL C ITIZEN PROGRAM INVITEES, Apr il 3 , 1.972""
Precinct No. ~
Hr. and Mr s . LeRoy R. Hayes ,. 2218 We st Harvard Avenue
Hr. and Mr s. Perry Le:w is , 2349 We st Harvard Avenue
H r. and Mr s . W ill.i.am H. Olsen,. 2193 w st 1l.i.ff Avenue
Precinct No. 2
H r . and Mr s . John D . Rari.don , 281.4 South Cherokee Street
Mr. and Mr s . Charles E . Hiller,. 3159 South A coma Street:.
Mr. and Mr s . John Lee H .i. tchell ,. 3~D~ South El.ati Street
Precinct No . 3 •
Mr. and Mrs . James Dotson, 2910 South Sherm..an Street
Mr. and Mrs . John Dressman,. 2891 Sout-h Logan Street
H ·r ... and Mrs. Darrel.l Hatwan,. 2936 South Lincoln Street
P ·reci.nct No. 4
Kr. and Mr s . Donald D. Salter, 3700 South Delaware Street
Mr. and Mr s . Donald L. Sandersfeld, 3827 South Inca Street
Mr. and H _rs. Johnny Sanderson,. 406 5 South Elati. Street
Precinct:. No . 5
Mr. and H::r s . w. A. M oody ,. 2900 South Clarkson Sereee
Mr . and Mr s. Le e Sal..azar, 3266 South Logan Street
Mr. and Mr s . A rthur 0. Sa I.e, 3126 South Logan Street
Precinct No. 6
Mr . and Hr s . John D . Sal.zm.a.n, 3445 South Downing Street
H r . and Mrs. Rue ben Sant.lstevan, 3335 South Emer s on Street
Hr. and Mr s . Kent D . Dounay, 29~0 South Marion Street
Precinc t No. 7 -Mr. and Mr s . George R. Sandage , 31.71 South WJ.ll.i.a.ms Street
Hr. and Hr s . Carl. H. Sartorius , 3466 South Race Street --and Hr .s . H ilton HorensteJ.n, 3470 South Race Street
l'"re cinct No. 8 ---and Mr s . Kenneth A. Rappe, 3335 South Clarkson Street • • Mr. and Mr s . D avi.d Redeker, 3447 Souch Sherma.n Street
Mr. and Mrs . Arthur L loyd Reed , 3412 South Logan Street
-• T 32X
•
0 -
Pa 0 ~ 2 -A pril 3 , 19 72 C ouncil l.nvlt
Preci n ct. No . "
M r . and Mr s . Patci.ck T . Donoho 408 7 South Clarkson Street
Mr . and Mr s . Allen R. Doran , 3861 South Sh rman S t:.reet
Mr. and Mr s . Larry P. Doty , 37 7 0 South Sherman Street
Pre-cinc t 1 0
Mr . and Mrs . F rance.., S a n d m y r , £.1.75 South Inca Street
Mr. and Mr J o hn M. Sang r, 4!00 South Bannock Stre.et
Mr . and Mr s . l.van R . Dransfeldt ., 1 50 South Huron Co urt
1 L
Mr. and Mr s . Carl R hn, 4152 South Logan Street
Mr. and Mr s . Clayton M. Sal.Ler., t...298 South Logan Street
Mr . and Mr s . Merwyn R. Sand s ted, 4119 South Sherman Street.
Precinct 12
Mr. and Mr s . Arthur G . Davi s , 1030 West Stanford Place
Mr . and Mr s . Wayne c . Oetken,. 4415 South Acoma Street
Mr . and Mr s . Don Sever s , 4545 South A coma St:.reet
Precinct No . 1 3
Mr. and Mr s . Ronald Sands., 2921 We st Saratoga Avenue
Mr . and Mr s . Richard D omier , 3168 w s ec Chenan go Aveun e
Mr . and t>ir s . John L . Dorlac , Jr .' 46 5 South Irving Street
Precinct 14
Mr . and Mr s . Sylvester E. Reynold s , 4995 South Inca Street
Mr . and Mr s . D o nald w. Harper, 4930 South E1at.i Street
Mr . and Mr s . William E . Ho.ldsworth, 4932 Sou t.h Galapago Sc.re.et
Precinct 15
Mr . and Mr s . R o bert Renz, 4765 South Bannock Street
Mr . and Mrs . K nneth L . Sabin , 4754 Sout.h Huron Street
Mr . and Mr s . Steven H . Sanborn , 4733 South Bannock St...-eet
16
• Mr . and Mr s . Charle s H . Sanders , 4911 South Wa shington Street • • Mr . and Mr s . Robert J . Disher , 4989 South L ogan Street
Mr . and Mr s . John Saunders , 4936 South Grant: St:.reet
•
•
•
•
0 ..._
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSI~N
March 7~ 1972
I. CALL TO ORDER.
The Regu1ar meeting o£ the City Pl.anning and Zoning
ca11ed to order by Chairman Lentsch at 8:00 p.m.
. ....... -t... .... r:n~ F" •
Conunission -as
Members Present: Stanl.ey; Brown;. Carl.son; Henning ; Vobejda; Robins;
Lentsch; Weist
lembers Absent: Ross
A1so Present: Romans~ Acting Ex -o~£icio ; Pl.anning Assistant Young
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
Mr. Lentsch stated that Minutes of February 23~ 1972, were to be
considered £or approval..
Henning moved:
Vobejda seconded: The Minutes of February 23, 1972, be approved
as wri-tten.
The motion carried.
I I I. EASEMENT VACATION
Lot 11, Oxford Heights
Second Fi1ing
CA SE F.6 72
Mrs. Romans stated that Mr. & Mrs. Louis Al.dretti, owners o£ property
at 4005 South Jason Street, have requested that the 16 £t. utility
easement on the north side o~ their property at that address be
vacated. Mrs. Romans stated that this property is R -1-C (Sing1e-
~ami.1y Residenti.a1), and abuts I -1 (Indust~a1) property to the
west. The b1ock in which this property is situated runs rrom West
Man.sfie1d Avenue to West Oxford Avenue, because West Nassau Avenue
was not dedicated £rom the Jason/Ka1amath a11ey to South Fox Street.
Mrs. Romans stated that at the time the subdivision p1at for this
area was approved, a 16 ft. easement wa s p1aced across the north
side of Lots 11 and 12, Oxford Heights, Second Fi1ing. and acro ss
Lot 7, Oxfo rd Heights, 3rd Fi1ing; which lots are 1ocated in what
would have been West Nassau Avenue, were it to have been dedicated.
The easement on Lot 7 has previously been vacated in 1965. Mrs.
Romans stated that there is a water 1ine in this easement, but that
the Uti1ities Department has stated that when a prob1em arises with
this 1ine , it wi11 be cut off and service wi.11 be provided from
other avai.1ab1c 1incs. There are no plans to insta11 other utilities
in this easement.
Mrs. Romans stated that the A1dretti property has a 58 ft . frontage,
and the owners want to build a garage with driveway, but cannot do
so if the easement is retained. Mrs. Romans stated that Mr. and
&~s. A1dretti. cou1d have better use of their property if the ease-
ment were to be vacated, and the proposed garage wou1d be in keep ing
with the intent o~ the Commission to require property owners to pro-
vide off-street parking spaces f or as many automobiles as possib1e .
Mrs. Romans discussed the 16 ft. Jason/Ka1amath alley, which is
dedicated only from West Mansfield Avenue south to the north line
of the A1dretti property . From that point south to West Ox£ord
Avenue. there is a 16 £oot utility easement rather than an a11ey.
She pointed out that the property to the west is zoned I -1 Light
Industrial, and that the industrial bui1dings have been built right
to the property line giving no rear set-back, and there is no en-
trance to most of these buildings off of the a11ey. Residents on
the we st side of South Jason Street p1ace their trash cans in ~he
•
• •
-
--
-
-
(
alley. and the trash haulers use this al..l..ey to empty the cans. Be-
cause it is a dead-end al..l..ey. their exit is to South Kal..amath Street
across that portion o£ West Nassau Avenue between the al..l..ey-easement
and Kal..amath. The A1dretti•s have grown a hedge a cross the back of
the eight ft . easement wh~ch is across the west line of their property.
Because or this hedge. the turning radius is such that the trucks
either hit the building at 3970 S outh Kal..amath or the Al..dretti's
hedge when turning into West Nassau Avenue to go west. Mrs. Romans
stated that there is a drainage problem in the a11ey. and be ca use
it has been so di~iicul..L to ~aintain. the Pub1ic Works Department
has included this a11ey and a 1.6 ~oot extension of the al..l..ey out to
South Kal.amath Street in the Paving District £or 1972. The Publ.i c
Works Department has d1scussed tbe proposed paving with the Al.drettis 7
and has indicated that 1£ the Al.drettis wil.l. deed to the 1ty the
8 rt. x 30 It . easement on the west l.ine of the1r property to g1ve
proper turning rad~us £rom the a11ey to the r1ght -o:C -way Cor w s~
Nassau Avenue 7 the C 1ty wil.l. not charge the A1drett is for paving or
the a11ey.
Mrs. Romans pointed ou1.. that the Ci.ty ha s no need .Cor the easemen t..
on the north 1ine o.C the property. and stated thatthe staff re ommended
vacation o£ su h easem nt 7 subJect to receiving a qu it c1 aim deed
from the Al.dretti..s Cor the S f t. x 30 ft . str1p.
Mr. L e nt sch stated that he and Mr . Robins had i nspec t ed the area.
and asked why the City didn"t take a ded ica t i on on the west side
of the A1dretti p ro p erty :Cor the entire width of the ir property?
Mrs. Roman s po inted out that the Pub1 ic Works De partmen t has in-
d icated an intention to vacate a port ion of We st Na ss au Avenue.
gi vin g a 16 ft. a11ey :Cro·m the Jason/K.al.amath a11ey we st to K a1amath
Street rather than the present 60 J:'t. right -o.C-way . Mrs. R o-ans
s tated that requiri n g a dedication of the 8 £t . e asement for the
f u11 north-sou th width of the A1dretti property wou1d serve no pub1ic
purpose.
Mr. Robins stated t..ha't he £e1t ••the o n 1y 1ogical. 'thing is to get a
dedicati.on from the A1drettis £or the £u11 width o£ Na ssa u Avenue
as is dcdi.cntcd to th e west. of the al..l.ey. •• H e fe1t the sma11 portion
o£ the easem e nt on the A1dretti property not proposed to be dedicated
wou 1d .. never be maintained. and wi11 be a trash c atcher... Discussi_on
fo11owed . &t:rs. Roman s reiterated the pl.an s of the Pub1ic Wo rks
Department to ask £or va c ation o f a11 but a 16 :Ct . ri.ght-o.C-wa y on
West Na ssa u Avenue fr om South Ka1amath e a st: to the Ja so n /Ka1amath
a11e y. Mrs. Romans stated th at the st a ff c ou1d not go a1ong with
Mr . Robi.n s· suggestio n, for the reason that there wouLd be no pub1ic
purpose served w ere the additional. easement area to be d edicated.
and that the sta:C£ wou1d c ontinu e to re c o mmend that th e A1drettis
b e asked to dedicate onl.y the north 8 :Ct. x 30 ft. of the easement.
Disc us sion fo11owed . Mrs. Henning asked ~f th e staff knew wh en the
request Lor va cat on o:C West Nassau right-of-way wou1d b e considered?
Mrs . Romans stated she wou1d chec k this out with Cit y Pub1ic Wo rks
Director Waggoner.
Mrs . Hennin g stat:ed that this matter has been discussed at City
C ounci1 1eve1 at. t.he time o1" the Pub1ic H eari n g on the Pav~ng Dis-
trict . She st:.a t.ed that this is a c ooperati ve venture between the
C ity and Mr. and Mrs. Al..dretti 7 and wil..1 h e 1p both parties .
Mr. A1dretti stated that he wou1d agree to dedicate the 8 ft . x
30 f t. portion o£ the e a sement . He pointed out that the portion
of the easement on their p:ooperty has not been a11owed to co11ect
trash ; they have a L1ower g ard e n and the hedge in the area. and they
have worked to k ee p it c1ean. Mr . A1dretti stated that papers from
the industrial. p1 a n ts to the west of his property b1ow into his
hedge. but not into his yard.
-2 -
• t·•
,
--
/' 32X
•
•
•
•
c
Mr. Rob ins stated he sti11 fe1t the dedication shou1d encompass the
entire 1ength or the easement on the A1dretti property, and that at
such time as Nassau Avenue right-o~-way is vacated, this portion
cou1d be deeded back to the A1drettis. Discussion fo11owed.
Henning moved:
Weist seconded: The P1anning Commission recommend to City Counci1
the easement in the north 16 ~eet of Lot 11, Oxrord
Heights, Second Fi1ing, be vacated; such vacation sba11 be subject
to the dedication of tbe north 30 £t. o£ the B Lt . uti1ity easement
on the west 1ine of the A1dretti property, said dedication containing
240 sq. ft., and as £urther defined in Case ~6-72 . The reason for
the recommended vacation being that neither pub1ic necessity or
convenience requires continued maintenance o£ this easement.
The motion carried, Mr. Robins voting nay.
IV. EASEMENT VACATION
Lot 12, Oxford Heights
Second Fi1ing
CASE .#7-72
Mrs. Romans stated that in 1965, the City vacated the uti1ity ease-
ment on the north 1ine of Lot 7, Oxford Heights, Third Fi1ing, which
is direct1y east of Lot 12, Oxford Heights, Second Fi1ing. Mrs.
Romans stated that she had contacted Mr. & Mrs. B1evins, property
owners of Lot 12, in regard to the possib1e vacation of this ease-
ment, and they asked that the easement be vacated. Mrs. Romans
stated that the sta£f has contacted the utiLity c ompanies and con-
cerned city departments, and there is no objection to the vacation .
Mrs. Romans stated that, again, there is no pub1ic purpose to be
served by retaining this easement.
Weist moved:
Henning seconded: The P1anning Commission recommend to City Counc11
that the easement in the north 16 feet of Lot 12,
Oxford Heights, Second Fi1ing, as further described in Case ~7-72 ,
be vacated; the reason for the vacation being that no pub1ic purpose
wi11 be served by the retention of the easement.
The motion carried.
v. SUBDIVISION WAIVER
4211 South Huron St.
CASE =-8-82
Mrs. Romans stated this property is 1ocated north of West Quincy
Avenue and is on the west side of South Huron Street. Mrs. Romans
stated this is a rather 1arge parce1 of 1and, and the owners,
Mr .. &. Mrs ... McLaugh1in, are seeking permission to se11 the north 75
ft. o£ the property. Mrs. Romans stated that the Subdivision
Regu1ations have a prov1sion whereby if there is nothing to be
gained by the £i1ing o£ a subdivision p1at such as pub1ic access,
uti1ities, etc., the P1anoing Commission may grant a subdivision
waiver. This Reso1ution granting the waiver is recorded with the
Arapahoe County C1erk and Recorder as a part of the permanent record
o~ the particu1ar rea1 estate.. Mrs. Romans stated that as far as
this parce1 o£ 1and at 4211 South Huron Street is concerned, there
appear to be no prob1ems --uti1ities are avai1ab1e, no additiona1
right -of-way is needed, etc. Mrs. Romans stated that it is tbe
recommendation or the staff that the subdivision waiver be granted
to Mr. and Mrs. McLaugh1i.n, giving them the right to se11 the north
75 ft. o£ their property.
Mr. Lentsch commented that this wi11 make a beautifu1 bui1di.ng site.
Henning moved :
Vobe~da seconded: The P1anni.ng Commission grant a waiver of the Sub-
division Regu1ations to Mr. & Mrs. McLaugh1in,
4211 South Huron Street, granting them the right to se11 the north
75 ft ... o£ their property as referred to in Case #8-72.
The motion carried.
-3-
;:: • !·li
• •
I'
•
-
-
c
Mr_ Sup~nger entered the meet~ng.
VI. BICYCLE TRATLS SYSTEM
-
CASE z::r S-72
February 23, 1972
February 8,1972
Mrs. Romans sl...ated that Po1ice Chief C1 a sby has been invited to the
meeting to d1scuss various items previous1y co n sidered by the Com -
mission in conn ection with the Bicyc1e Trai1 System~ and upon which
the Co~ission wanted add~tiona1 in£ormation.
Chie~ C1asby d~scussed the bicyc1e 1icensing program which is
in ef£ect, and that which is proposed i n the Bicyc1e Trai1s System
Report. Chief C1asby stated that at the present time, it is a one-
time 1icensing program, the 1icense costing $.50. Chief C1asby stated
that the present Ord inance governing the contro1 of bicyc1es was
written many years ago, and gives no authority ~or impounding the
bicyc1e. does not require registration or proof o~ ownership. and
gives the Po1ice Depart~ent 1itt1e enforcement ca pab i1ity. Chie£
C1asby stated that the present ordinance requires that the 1icensing
£unctions be carried out through the Po11ce Department; he has
r econunended to the City Manager that possib1y the 1icensing program
cou1d be expanded through use or the F~re Departme nt substat1ons.
and that this cou1d he1p make the 1icensing become more e£~ecti v e .
Chief C1asby reviewed the procedure now pursued by a bicyc1ist in
an effort to ge t h is bicyc1e 1icensed. and stated that this is in-
convenient for both the bicyc1e owner and for the Po1ice Department
staff. Chie£ C1asby stated he fe 1t the proposa1 to make use of the
Fire substations wou1d be more c onven ient for the bicyc1e owner.
and that he a1so £e1t the on -duty firemen wou~d be better equipped
to co ndu ct the inspection of the bicyc1es. Chie£ C1asby stated
that today many of the bicyc1es purchased have no seria1 numbers on
them. H e advocated the stamping o f such a number on the b1cyc1e at
the tim e the 11cense is purchased; he further noted that today.
eve n ir a bicyc1ist purchases a 1icense for h1s bicyc1e. and the
bicyc1e 1S sto1en. it is very di£~icu1t to recover with on1y the
1icense as a record . Chier C1as by stated that the st amp i ng on o£
the seria1 number is another reason he is in favor o~ the 1icensing
program being carried out by the Fire Department. Chie£ C1asby
stated that the stamping o£ the seria1 number wou1d not be hard to
do. nor wou1d 1t be expensive . and this would give one add1tiona1
method £or ruture identification.
Chie£ C1asby stated that when he assu~ed the position o£ Ch1e~ o£
Po1ice. there v.as an ent1re .. room :Cu11 o1: bicyc1es .. that had been
recov ered after being sto1en . but the owners cou1d not be traced.
and there was no approved way to dispose of sucb items. Ch1ef
C1asby stated that at the present time. bicyc1es that are recovered
and whose owner cannot be found. may be (1) so~d at pub1ic auction.
the funds goi n g to the Po11ce Benefit Association: (2 ) Donated to
needy 1ami1ies; or (3) Donated to service c1ubs or charities ~or
distribution to needy £am~1ies.
Chie£ C1asby discussed ei1orts of the Po1ice Department to increase
the 1icensing program through a pub1ic re1ations program in the
schoo1s. and in co•l~unction with service c1ubs, such as the Kiwanis
C1ub. which inspects and repairs bicyc1es for the chi1dren if they
wi11 bring them to schoo1 . Chief C1as by stated that be re1t that
most chi1dren·s b1kes were .. in pretty good shape·•. and that most of
them are 1icensed; but . he s ta ted that a g ood many adu1ts don•t have
their bicyc1es 1icensed. Chief C1asby stated that he fe1t a program
to encourage 1icensing and an effort to make the 1icensing procedure
con ven ient to the bicyc1ist wou1d be very benefi cia 1.
Mr. Lentsc h asked how many accidents ~nvo1v ~ng b icyc1ists had
occurred this past year or so? Chief C1asby stated that the number
o:C a ccidents is ·•so insignificant .. that separate rec ords are not
kept.
-4-
•
-•
r 32x
•
•
•
•
c
Chief C1asby suggested thaL a method or annual licensing should
a1so be .:J..nst.iga-ted for bicycles, rather than the ••cumulative·· one-
time procedure now in e££cct.
Chie£ C1asby £urcber discussed the theft prob.iem, and noted that
there were 344 b~cyc1e ~he£~s 1ast year, o£ whi c h 33 bicycles were
re overed. He noLed that stolen bicycles are hauled out or the
metro area by the ·•truck-1oad '' and are often so1d to second-hand
dealers in other mun~~1pa~ areas.
Ch1ef Clasby tben discussed the proposal of requiring proa L of
ownership by the bicycle r~der . Mrs. Henning inquired as to what
type o£ p~-oo.f wou1d be required? Chief C1asby stated that a
reg~stration card as auto drivers carry wou1d be suf£~cient. Chier
Clasby suggested that with the initia1 1icense app1ication, a bi11
of sa1e wou1d serve as proof oL ownership, but questioned whether
we shou1d go that far in the proposed 1icens~ng program. Chief
C1as by did suggest that once the bicyc1e was 1icensed, the rider be
required to have the reg1stration in order to r~de the b1cyc1e on a
pub1ic street. Discussion ~o11owed.
Chief C1asby stated that .if t:he City did adopt a bicyc1e t:rai1s
syste·m, that O rd:J..nar..ccs governing bicy cl'lst:s shou1d be adopted at
the same time .
Mr. Weist questioned whether the increased traffic has bad an effect
on the number of' bicyc1es i.nvo1ved in accidents"? Chie£ CJ.asby
stated that the increased traf£ic has had 1itt1e or no e££ect on
the number of accidents with bicyc1es.
Enf:orcement of present 1aws against minor bi yc1ists was considered.
trs ... H e nning asked Chief: C1as by bow it wou1d be hand1ed . Chief:
C1asby stated that poss ib1y there shou1d be a modification of
Ordinances: he d1scussed the statutes which regu1ate b:icyc1ists.
not i ng that the ru1es were ··vague •• • and he .fel.t they shou1d be
strengthened . Chie:£ C1asby stated thaL the ·•de1.inqui.ncy·• provision
woul.d be used in en.CorcemenL against m inors. bu ·t "'that adu1t bicyc1ists
coul.d be cited into munic~pa1 c ourt.
Mr. Lentsch asked Chief Clasby if he was in favor of the bicycle
trai1 system as proposed in the report subm~tted to the Plannin g
Commiss1o n ? Chie£ Cl.asby stated that he was not in fa vor o£ taking
publ.:J..c streets and turning them into bicyc le paths . Chie~ Cl a sby
acknow1edged there should be provisions £or peop1e who want to ride
bicycles, but pa~·ticu1ar1y i£ the increase of b1cycl.ists ~hat .is ex-
pected does occur. "'they shou1d noL have the b icyc1e 1anes on a
pub1ic street. Chie£ C1asby cited an incident when he drove .Crom
S a nta Fe to Broadway on Ridge Road. which Road has a bicyc1e path
al.ong iL, and stated thaL ~hcu he drove this route during the
''ni ght -t1me hours•·, bi.cy 1ist..s using the bi cyc1e route caused a
de£ninite hazard.
Mr. Brown asked Chie£ Cl.asby i£ bicyclists were ever ticketed £or
running red 1ights, sLop s1gns, etc? Chief C1asby stated there
were no court citat~ons 1ssued in 1970. 1971. or to date in 1972.
Mr . Brown then asked i.C Chie:f' 1asby 1.'e1t the Ordinan ces needed to
be .. tigh-t.ened up .. ? Chie:C Cl.asby stated that be did .1'ee1 so.
Mrs. Romans noted that Mr. Royther of the Parks Department wi11 be
prepared to discuss the b~cyc1e 1ane system at the time o£ the
meeting of the P1ano i n g Commission and Parks & Recreation Co~ission.
Mr. Lentsch t.h.anked Chief: Cl.asby for attending the meeting, and for
his views on the matter.
-5-
• '· 'T
• •
T 32 X
-
-
-
-
VII.
c
PARKS & RECREATION C OMMISSION
Marcb 29, 1972
-
Mrs. Romans stated that a suggested date £or the meeting o £ the
P1anning Commission and the Pa r k s & R ecreation Commission is
;tarch 29th.
!lolr. Lent..sch noted t hat this wou1d be a specia1 m eeting f or the
P1anning C ommi ssion and m ight possib1y be a s p ecia1 me e ting £or
the Parks Commis sion. Mrs. Romans pointed out that it was a
••suggested .. date on1y. M.r. C ar1son asked if this me e ting cou1d be
worked in with the P1anning C ommis si on regu1ar m eeti n g , or maybe
with the Parks Commission reg u1ar m eeti n g? Mr. Supinger stated
tha~ it was £e1t bo th Comm issions cou1d spend one entire evening
in discussion or the bicyc1e trai1s system , and that perbaps an
e v eni n g when no other business had been scbedu1ed wou1d b e best £or
this m eeting .
Mr. Lentsch stated the P1ann ing Commission wou1d p1an to me et with
the Parks Commi ssion on ),\arch 29th.
VIII. DIRECTOR'S C HOI CE
Mrs. Romans stated that Mr. Fred Wo1£, a member o£ the Denve r P1ann i ng
sta££, has o ffered to come to a P1anning C ommis si on meeting and e x -
p1ain the Denver Bicycl..e Trail.. system . Mrs~ Romans questioned i£
the C ommission wou1d want to set a meeting date to bear Mr. Wol..f 's
pre se ntation, or i£ possibl..y they might want to invite him to the
Parks Commission /Pl..anning Commission meeting on March 29th?
Mr _ Lentsch questioned that the C ommission was ready to bear Mr .
Wol..f, and suggested that when he did make his presen~ation to the
C ommission, his time shoul..d be 1imited to l../2 hour or so~ Mr. Lentsch
noted that he had observed bike trai1s in Lakewood and Aurora, and
that no one wa s us i ng the trai1 s in Aurora, for i nstance, at 2 p.m.
on Sunday afternoon. Dis c ussion £o11owed .
Mrs. H e nning stated she fe1t there is a need to expand the bicycl..e
l..icensing program, and that this coul..d b e done right away, inasmuch
as it does not tie into the bicycl..e trail.. s y s tem itse1f. She
further stated that she woul..d l..ike to see firm recommendations £rom
the staf£ on c hanging the Ord inances concerning bi c ycl..es.
Mr. Weist commented that he does not fee1 that the City of Eng1ewood
is in any rea1 hurry to get into the bicycl..e trail.. system , and that
perhaps w e shou1d wa it until.. the Denver system has been in operation
for a time.
Mrs . Vobejda stated she agreed with Mr. Weist, and that she fe1t
the City shoul..d take it ··one step at a time·•.
Mr. Carl..son sta t ed he woul..d 1ike to have information from Litt1eton
residents who l..ive a1ong bicyc1e trai1s. For instance, do the
:residents .Cee1 that the ··buttons·· markin g the trai1s have any
e1.Cect, and do the bicyc1ists ride i n the desig nated trail..? Do th e
residents sti11 park the automobil..es i n the trai1s; Mr. C ar1son
stated he fe1t ~here was considerab1e research that shou1d be done
before a decision was made.
Mrs . Stanl..ey sta ted she fe 1t the Commission shou1d be ••tota11y in-
formed··; she noted that the pro.ject is expensive and she fe1t the
Commission shoul..d have as much in£ormation as possib1e _
Mr s . Vobejda asked if M.r. Wo1f wou1d come to the meeting and give
just a background summary or the Denver system? Mr. Car1son sug-
gested that this be p1aced on the Agenda for the next meet ing if
the agenda isn 't too fu11 .
-6-
•
0
--
I'
•
•
•
•
c
Ir. Rob1ns stated he Le1c much more research must be done : he noted
that ~t :t.s a ""1ot or money to put ~nto ~t when you don"t know ~£
people wi1l. use 1t··.
Mr. Brown sLated he felt Mr . Wol£ shoul..d come t.o a Commission meeting;
he stated he .f'e1t. we shou1d taJ..k to a11 the ··research peop1e .. that:
we possib1y can , and then form a decision.
Mrs. Romans st:at.ed that 1tems suggested for d:J..scussion with the
Parks & Recreation Comm1SS10n are:
1.. A br:iefing on the Core Area P1anni..ng Conun:t.ttee.
2. A br:t.eL'"l.ng on the Workab 1e Program C:i.t.i.zens" Committee .
3. DiscuSS100 or dra1nage park-ways.
4. Discussion o£ the go1£ course study .
5 . Oiscuss:t.on o£ possibl.e parks a1ong South P1att:e River.
6. The KLZ S1te pl..ans.
7. The Bicyc1e trail.. system .
1r . Lents ch stated he wanLed to discuss the goals of the Parks Com-
m1ss1on : he sta~ed he wanted to rind out what their goa1s were for
the next ten years, Lor :t.nstance . He stated he a1so wanted to know
how much park land the City should have for the population we have .
Mrs. Henn~ng stated she £e1t the goals o£ the Parks & Recreation
Co mm~ssion cou1d tie i.nto 1ater d~scussions on the Capi"t...a1 Improve-
ments budget .
Mrs. Romans asked that reservations ~or the DRCOG Annua1 Dinner
meeting be con~irroed.
n:aose attending: Mr . &. 1\Jrs . L-entsch: Mr . &. Mrs. Weist: M..r .. &. Mrs .
C arlson: Atrs. Stan1ey, and Mr . Brown .
Mrs. Romans s~ated t:h.at t:.he Sem:t.nar Cor Plann1ng Conun:i.ss~on members
has been schedu1ed on Thursdays from larch 30th through May 11th,
7 p .m. to 9:30 p.m. MJ~s . Romans stated that th1s is a cooperative
venture o£ the DRCOG and the Un1versity o£ C olorado, Denver Center.
She stated that she £e1t there were we11-qua1ified people involved
in the Seminar, and urgE"d members, part .1.cu1ar1y new members, o:f' the
Comm.1ssi.on to part..J.c:tpate .
Mrs. Vobejda stated sh would 1ike to paJ~ticJ..pal:.e :1n the Seminar.
Mr. Carlson asked i .f' l:.hi.s was a "cont:inu1ng program··, or i.f one member
could attend one even1ng, and another membeJ-at"'t.end a di..f:fe.rent
eve·oi..ng . M:r. Supingcr st ated he .fo1t i"'t shou1d be c1assif'1ed as a
continuing program, with attendance at a11 sessions advisab1e.
Mrs . Romans asked i.J' l:.he C onun1ssion members .JJanted to set another
specia1 meet.1.ng date for discussi on o£ the Sign Code? She pointed
out that t.he Comm:t.ss.i.on now has meet1ngs set:. for March 15th, 21st,
and 29th. Mr. Lentsch suggested that this matter be brought up at
the next meet~ng, and Lhe date be set at that time.
IX . C OMMISSION 'S C HOI CE
Mr. L entsch st.at. d he felt the C ommission members shou1d make an
effor~ to view matters which it wi11 be considering , such as the
two easement. vacat.1on requests consi dered this evening. Mr . Lentsch
stated he was st111 concerned about the Jason /Ka1amath A11ey in the
4000 b1ock , and stated that he £e1t 1t shou1d be made one-way .
Mrs. Romans stat.ed she would bring th1s point up to the Pub1ic Works
Department :Cor ·their cot_'l.Sideration •
Mr. Lentsch asked Mrs .. Henning and Mr . Bro wn for a sUJnm.ary of the
City Counci1 meeting. Mrs. Henning stated that O ffices , Ltd., has
redesig ned Lheir bu1ld1ng, and now d o es n ot need the height exce p ti on
because they have prov~ded sufficient setback to off-set the exceed e d
-7-
• •
1'32X
•
•
•
•
(
height. The app1icant bas now purchased the north 247.6 feet of 1and
on the east side of the b1ock (west side of South Sherman Street).
and the Counci1 wi11 vacate the entire a11ey in B1ock 6, Premier
Addition. The Commission wi11 need to review the parking p1ans again,
however.
Mrs. Henning stated that Counci1 passed a forma1 reso1ution approving
the request £or Federa1 funds for the Northwes t Eng1ewood Greenbe1t,
and for storm drainage in northwest and northeast Eng1ewood.
Mr. Lentsch asked i£ Counci1 approved the attendance of two members
of the Commission at the ASPO Conference? Mrs. Henning stated
Counci1 did approve such.
Discussion fo11owed. Mr. Lentsch, Mr. Car1son, and
a11 indicated a desire to attend this conference.
that if the approva1 was on1y for the attendance of
wou1d withdraw his name.
Brown moved:
Mr .. Robins had
Kr. Robins stated
two members. be
Vobe~da seconded: Mr. Leo Lentsch and Mr. Kenneth Car1s on be de-
signated as Commission representatives to the
ASPO Conference to be he1d in Detroit. Michigan, Apri1 15th-20th.
The motion carried.
Mr . Lentsch discussed the expense payments of the P1anning Commission
members. which is $16 per month as contrasted to other Board and
Commission members who receive $25 per month. He stated that Mr.
Dia1 had indicated he wou1d check into this matter at one time.
and Mr . Lentsch asked that the m .atter be pursued.. Mr. Robins
stated he didn" t ""know where anyone arrived at the figure of $16
per month ; the P1anning Commission does as much work or more than
the rest of them·• ..
Mr. Lentsch asked why East Dartmouth Avenue from Logan west to
Broadway has not .been widened to match Dartmouth Avenue east of
South Logan Street. He stated he fe1t this wou1d be a reasonab1e
improvement.. Mr .. Car1son suggested that this pro~ect might be one
for the Core Area P1anning Committee to consider. a1so.
Mrs. Romans discussed a memorandum to the Commissi on on a fo11ow -u p
of Case #4-71. the vacation of portions o f South Huron Street and
West Corne11 Avenue at the request of Wins1ow Construction Company.
At the time of the action by the Commission. Wins1ow Construction
Company agreed to a "'decorative mesh-type weave·• in the chain 1ink.
fence they proposed to insta11 across the south side of their property,
which is ad~acent to West Dartmouth Avenue. This decorative mnteria1
has not been insta11ed as yet. and upon contacting the Construction
Com pany. the staf£ has been assured that it wi11 be. There apparent1y
have been prob1ems in obtaining the materia1 for the fence .
Mr. Lentsch discussed the parking 1ot north of the First Nationa1
Bank. He stat.ed that he fe1t the Ordinance shoul.d be amended to
require better surfacing than has been p1aced in this parking 1ot.
Discussion fo11owed ..
The meeting ad~ourned at 9:50 p.m.
G~-~~~z~
Recording Secreta:Y
-8-
•
• •
•
•
c
fa.tEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: March 7. 1972
SUBJECT: Easement Vacation Lot 11, Ox£ord Heights, Second Fi1ing
RECOMMENDATION: The P1anning Commission rec~end to City Counci1
the easement in the north 16 £eet of Lot 11,
Ox ford Heights, Second Filing, be vacated ; such vacation sha11 be
subject to the dedication o~ the north 30 ft . of the 8 ft . utility
easemenL on the west 1ine o£ the A1dretti property, said dedication
c ontaining 240 sq. £t ., and as £urtber defined in Case #6-72. The
reason ~or the recommended vacation being that neither pub1ic
necessity or convenience requires continued maintenance of this
easement .
Respe ct~u11y submitted,
By Orde r o£ the City P1anning
and Zoning Commission
G~~-4~_q;k~
Recording Secretary
-9-
• \ !
"!'
• •
T 32X
•
•
•
•
( (
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING C OMMISSION.
DATE: :March 7~ 1972
SUBJECT: Easement Vacation~ Lot 12, Ox ford Heights, Second Filing
RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Co~ission recommend to City Council
that the easement in the north 16 feet of Lot 12,
Ox ford Heights, Second Filing, as further described in Case #7-72,
be vacated ; the reason for the vacation being that no public purpose
wi11 be served by the retention of the easement.
Respectfully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission .
de;;::;~~ # _;;?~ GERTRUDE G. WEL
Re c ording Sec retary
-IO-
•
• •
r 32x
•
•
•
•
0 -
O FFICI AL
C'I"J:Z COU 'CIL OC UMF,...
WORKABLE PROGRAM CITIZENS'
Regu1ar Meeting
March 23, 1972
COMMITTEE
-. . ~
Members present:
Members absent :
c cu · ._ _ . __ -,, F
Cf'l"'Y O F E GLEWC OO, C
Ruth H. A11en; Bever1y Gonza1ez; Char1es
Henning ; Reverend Herbert Hosanna ; George
Johnston; Herbert Mosbarger: J. Louis
Parkinson ; Berry S1ater ; Jacques Stackhouse ;
Gi1bert Va1dez; Russe11 G. Woods, Jr.; and
Dr .. Char1es Zartman .
Wi11iam Boom: Ma1co1m E. Co11ier, Jr .; Pat
Decker; Judith B. Henning ; Edna Hern; Mi1ton
Senti ; Wi11iam Stevenson ; Edna Tourte1ot and
Vi Weist ..
O ther persons present: C1arence Freeman. Pub1ic Information
Officer. Denver Mode1 City Program; Car1
Zennon. Administrative Intern; James L.
Supinger. Director of C ommunity Deve1opment.
The meeting oL the Workab1e Program Citizens• Committee was
he1d in the Community Room of the Eng1ewood City Ha11 and was
ca11ed to order by Chairman Parkinson at 7:35 p .. m.
The Minutes of the meeting on March 2. 1972. were approved upon
a motion by Mr .. Johnston and seconded by ~tt. S1ater ~
A!r. Parkinson introduced Mr .. C1arence Freem.an. Pub1ic Information
Officer with the Denver Mode1 City Program.. Mr .. Freem..an showed
the Committee a doc\.Uilentary fi1rn entit1ed ··The Pub1ic Wi11"" ..
This £i1m is presented by the Nationa1 League of Cities as part
of its cont~nuing program to o~fer eva1unt~ons of mun~cipa1
governme nt trends to city officia1s and to citizens .
Mr .. Freeman 1eft the meeting fo11owing the sho wing of the
documentary. He o~~ered to attend a future meeting of the
Committee to discuss the Denver Mode1 City Program.
Mr. Henning distributed c opies o£ a pub1ication prepared by
the Regiona1 Transportation District which sets forth the
Phase I Concept . Mr .. Henning. a member o:C the Arapahoe County
Advisory Committee to R.T.D •• said that the District wi11 now
begin work on Phase II and that he wi11 we1come any comments
from the Committee members.
Mr .. Supinger reported that RTD is refining the "brush .. approach
of the p1an and have designated Eng1ewood as a prime transporta-
tion corridor. The Eng1ewood centra1 business district is con-
sidered an activity center and the District wants to work with
the City in determining where the route wi11 go ..
'
• \ !
~
• •
•
•
•
•
0 -
The Committee di sc usse d Lhe RTD p1an and the Eng1ewood-Litt1eton-
Ft. Logan bus service. Mr . l.1osbarger and l\1r. Johnston expressed
concern that bus servi c e has not been extended to the res~dentia1
area in northwest Englewood . Mr . Supinger explained that the
Comprehensive Plan, approved in 1969, recommends that the bus
route be extended into the residentia1 area th r oughout the City,
but that the expansion of Lhe service appears to be a question
of priori..ty.
The fact sheet explaini n g the Loca1 Hous ing Authority and the
Ur ban Ren ewa1 Authority was discussed . In£ormat1on used i n
the City of Littleton wben persons in that City were c onsideri n g
the estab1ishment o.f a Loca1 Hou si n g Authority was distributed
for information . It was the Fee1i n g or some of the members
that a di££erent £ormat wou1d be mo re satis£actory .
At the March 2nd meeting, the staf£ was di r ected to have
petitions available on this date Lor members to circulate,
petitioning the City Council to create a Local Housing Authority
and an Urban Renewal Author1ty . These petitions were available
and most members took one of each o£ the two petitions. It wa s
the concensus that, even though on1y 25 s ignatures are necessary
on each of the question_s to petition th e C:t.ty Counci1 to c on-
sider the establishment of tbe t~o Aut..hor:t.t:t.es, it would be
advisable to obtain as many signatures as poss:t.b1e .
Apri1 13, 1972, was the date set £or the return o£ the s:t.gncd
peti..tions _
Tbe matter o£ press re1eases on
was discussed, and the ma~or~ty
of the opinion that it ~ou1d b
to the press.
the c1rculation o£ tbe petitions
o£ the Comm~ttee m e mbers were
appropriate to issue the release
Chairman Parkinson c a11ed Lor reports from the sub-committees:
Publ ic Relations : No report.
Code Enforcement : lr. Valdez report d that this c omm ittee had
met and wou1d have a report at the next meeting .
eighborhood Developmen~; Dr. Zaronan s ta~ed that the
presentation by Mr . Robert Davis at th Iarch 2nd meeting bad
cov ered the eighborbood Development Program quite thoroughly;
be had no Curtber report .
Loca1 Hous~ng Author:t.~Y -Urban Rene~a1 Author:t.ty ; No report .
&~. H enning reported that be understood a rather unique Ci ty-
s pons o red 1and acqu:t.sition program 1s underway in Dearborn,
Michigan .. The C:t.ty has sec up a revo1ving .Cund to purchase
houses wh:t.ch are dilapida~ed . The house 1s razed and the 1and
is so1d .Cor new housing. Mr. Supinger stated that he wi11 be
-2-
•
• •
r
-
-
0 -
in Detroit, Michigan .:1.n Apr:L1 t:.<> attend the conference of:' the
American So i.ety of Planni.ng Off:i.cia1s and he would try to
obtain details on the Dearborn program at ~hat time.
Sane of the members had expressed 1nt.erest .:1.n a meeti.Q?: with
representatives or the hletro Housing Ce nter . It was agreed
that this would be the program at the next meet.:1.n.g.
A tour was d.:1.s c ussed and C hairman Park1n ~on sugges ted that this
matter be placed on the agend a for the next meeting and that
the members jot down any suggestions they m1ght have about areas
to be covered on Lhe tour . These su~gest:Lons wi.11 be considered
at the next m et1n~ and a tour scheduled £or two or three weeks
later.
The C ommi1..tee had discussed 1nV1t.ing membe1.·s o.f the College
View Project Area Com.mittee to meet w:J..th t..hem and suggested
that this be p1anned £or the May meet1ng. May 4th was a
suggested date ..
~tt. Johnston asked whether or not it ~ou1d be premature £or
the citizens 1n Northwest Eng1ewood to consider appointing
members to a Pro.Je t Area Com.m:J..tt e. Mr. Sup1nger sugges -ted
it migh~ be p mature to appoint that committee but that cer-
tain1y the C:J..t:J..zens ou1d d:J..scuss the deve1opment of their
area.
~tt-Park:J..n son rem:J..nded the members that the By -1aws estab1ish
one year terms or office for of~1ce rs and asked if this matter
shou1d be p1a ced on the agenda 1or the next meeting? The
present o~f:J..cers were e1ected on lay 12 . 1971. The By-1aws
provided that of£~cers may be r e 1ected.
Discuss:J..<>n o£ the appo1ntment o£ a Record:J..ng Secretary fo11ow e d.
Mr. Henning moved, Mrs. A11en seconded, Lhat the City tanager
and Person ne1 Director be contacted and urged to secure the
services o£ a p rson to act as Recording Secretary to the
Workab1e P rogram C~tizens~ Committee, in order that the staff
member acting in that capacity cou1 d participate more e1~ective1y
i n the bus1oess o:C the comm~ttee. The motion carried.
tr. Supinger reported that the request Lor Federa)._ assistance
in the greenbe1t and s ·torm drainage prog am 1n Northwest
Eng1ewood wi..11 be approved . He tol..d "t:.h Comm:1..t tee that he has
suggested that a modu1ar un~t of some type be p1a ed on 1and
in the new greenbe1t area on Sou't.h Vassar Avenue to serve as
a sub-City Ha11. This c ou1d be used .for meetings o£ citizens
in the at-e:l. nn information ce nter and headquarters Cor the
Environmenta1 Code en~orcement orficer in that area~ He is
oL the opin"J..on that this wi11 be a way o.f making the 1oca1
government more access1b1e to the peop1e and this , Mr. Sup:1..n ger
:Cee1s, :J..S mo st important, espec:1..a11y at this time when the re-
deve1oprnent. prop;ran1 is be1ng cons:1..dered.
-3-
•
-•
'.
"!' T 32
-
-
-
-
0 -
The Committee discussed the 1ocation o~ the Fire Station pro-
posed to be bui1t in the northwest Eng1ewood area and questioned
whether or not that bui1ding cou1d serve as the sub-City Ha11
Mr. Mosbarger questioned whether or not there wou1d be sites
for bousi~g on the s o uth side of West Vassar Avenue. Mr.
Supinger stated that in order to get Federa1 assistance in tbe
open space and storm drainage progr am . the 1and has to be used
for open space and recreationa1 purposes i n perpetuity. Mr.
Supinger stated that the greenbe1t program wi11 i nvo1ve 9-1 /2
acres ; seven acres is between Te~on a nd Zuni and the remaind er
is east o £ Zuni where a strip 150 feet wide wi11 extend fr om
the east sid e of South Tejon Street to the rai1road s pu r on
t h e east side o f the City boundary.
It was the c oncensus o f the Committee that Mr. Supinger•s idea
f o r a s ub-City Ha11 on the greenbe1t site has considerab1e
merit and that it shou1d b e pursued.
Mr. Supinger announced that the City wi11 be contracting with
the Denver Urban Renewa1 Authority for re1ocation services in
re1ocating the five fami 1ies who wi11 be disp1aced in the green-
be1t acquisition. The City wi11 pay DURA on a cost bas is out
of the project money.
Mr. S1ater asked if persons wi11 have to be re1ocated if tbey
don't want to be? Mr. Supinger said that in this case. the
fami 1ies wi11 be re1ocated in any event; but that be under-
stands that two o f the five f ami1ies invo1ved are very much
interested in re1ocating . In each case. the owners wi11 be
paid a f air market va1ue for their property and up to $15.000
additiona1 in order that they can purchase a comparab1e house
or a house -hich meets the minimum housing standards. I f the
owner is occupying the house. he wi11 a1so be given moving
expenses. If the house is renter occupied. the owner wi11 be
paid the fair market va1ue and the tenant wi11 be provided
assistance which can amount to $1.000 a year f or four years.
As an examp1e. ~~-Supinger suggested that it can be assumed
that the City wou1d bu y the house at a fair market va1ue of
S5.000 and a compara b1e house wou1d cost S20.000. The City
wou1d pay the fair market va1ue. $5.000 p1us the additiona1
$15.000 necessary ~o purchas e the $20.000 house. In addition ~
the owners w ou1d receive moving expenses.
Mrs . A11en reported brief1y on the critica1 housing prob1ems
that she observ ed in Hong Kong whi1e on a recent tour o f the
Or ient .
The meeting was adjourned at 9:55 P.M.
Respectfu11y submitted.
'
--
T 32X
-
-
-
-
0 -
Fire Dep:1rtment In s tr-uctor· s Con.ference
Kansas City .. :\llssourl
:\larch 1-1-17., 1972
T he '"F!)ICn .is s onsored by the Insurance Se: :.-vi..ccs Of" .!:i.ce • . .:..d·.:£st.crn
Rc&ion ..
Ch..:ti.r-a -:-1 Ke nne th L .. St:a.~!:-=>n (F ire PrevEnti.on Di.::-ect:or. ISO ""-cl c.o ... cd
th e c onfe r ee s P nd ex?!~~n~d the c h~r.=c in sponsorsh~p n ~e ~ ~c.h
'\oo:"a s fo~e -=ly the \:c.stc::T'l A ctua r ial Bu :.-.au .
Thi.s program was p1an~ed by a 7 0 -r.an co ~~itte e mee ting i.n Ch i.c ago
1ast Dec.e::-tbcr , ... -hi.c.h c o nsid e red o"-e r 300 sug:&estions sent i.n by
interested Fi r e Depart~e nt or i ented people .
In a ke)~ote address evaluating the role of the fire service in
modern society. Professor Richa rd Bland. Chai.rman , Pres.ident •s
N~ti.on a 1 Co~iss ~on on Fire Prevent~on and Contra~ (Penn State
Uni.vers:..ty) ....... -arned th ~~ .. widely fract:.i.onalized po,...-er as i.t exists
in the A.."":'teri.c an Fire S er,·i.ce i.s ....._,.or k .i.ng t o its de::.ri.r::'lent'' i.n
contrast t.o .r::teri.can p o lice se=-v-i c.es . tie c.onpa red f i.re fi.,ohti.ng
"'·i.th 1odern a c hi.evc::tcnts i n space tra,·el. ,,·i.th its ''magnific ent
mach i nes a nd ~e t:i.cu l ously trained " operators. ''Our machines a re
not ad a?:;.i ,~e and our di.sci.p li.ne is rotten". he said . "The fire
~~~b!il t: ~~~eb~~~~~c~h:oft~!l~~r!~~~~m~~!~~y~t=~~d :ec~~;~ally ...
i.nci.dence co ~pa red wi th po~ulati.on &ro ~th is nearly consta nt ••• fi.re
loss versus g ro ss n a tional proCuct i.s dec.reasi.ng ••• fi.re protection
t e chno l ogy is as ~e11 developed in the U.S . as anywhere in the
wor1d ••• Nonetheless. f i re figh t e r c~npower is util i zed effec tive -
ly less th3 n 2 0% of the tim e, only 3~ in fire fi&ht~n g . A ct ive
fire i.ns?ect ion, he said, a n d prevent ion activities would seem a
most ap;>ropri.ate utilization . "Disease con trol is most effective
when it prevents disease , not " ... -hen it finds ,....-ays to cure. The
fire problem is similar ," he point ed out . For this reason. the
priorities established by the Nati onal Cotnmi.ssion list .,prevention ..
fi rst ••• early and r eliable detect ion second ••• and fi re su ppr ess~on
last.
Roger C. K rafft (Secretary, ISO N .Y.) said a s he explained that
ISO established in 1971. cons o lidated \iestern Actuarial Bur eau .
other regional insurance and state ratLng bureaus ~nd their services
under one national organization . \Jhi1e ISO 's home office is in
New York. it has at least one office in every state, he said. ISO
continu e s to evaluate m unicipal fire defenses vLa its town grading
services as successor to Ame rican Insurance Association . He
concluded by &iving conferees a brief history of FDIC from its tiny
beginn ings in 1928 (eig ht persons} to i ts present gigantic. annual
attendance of over 4.000 persons.
• \
~
--
1'32X
-
-
-
-
0 -
__ Co~-:o~n T . -~~~ C1o~~sv~~~e F~) to1d the con~ere~s th e ~ ~e hav~ ~c~~ tnl ~:-~ ~~=c p =c v~n~~o~ to pcop1c ~~as~ =a :~ co~c~rn a~c ~n~~r~s~ ~s fire s~??=cs5 ~vn . poin~in ;; o~t ~h a t pre -pl3nn~r.~
sh ac:c c-r~:c o ~-rc !:_htc: to c onditLon hi~s•lf ~aaL nst surprise .
to n ~~le h~~ ~o :c~c ~~rc s~t~&L iors corre cL ly . -r.d to ~e t ou~
o[ a b~~ ~ire si~cct~o~ ~~ one piec e . Cs "n& slides . he showed
a.1 1. c.~r ... co.ct.c: ~or c!:!:c c :::.:....".-£. si.?c -ury and at t a c k b.::~. seC upon pre -
p1annin0 inspection forr..s .
!'1A1!'1 ST3.EET 1..' .S .A . ,.;-it':-\ its b-..:i ldin g s of "ordinary c ons truct i on" (~aso nr y ~alls . co ~b ustible roofs and inter iors) c an be d ea th traps
for fi.=e depar~:-:1e:n::.s . T h:..s y,;.as the therr:.e of F. L . B-::-.o.nni.gar:., (!'~ontgo"'"""Y Co l 1e~e . :'.ock.vi lle . :-!d .) ..:ho (i n his O"'--n i nimitable
rapid -fire style) "hizzed the aud i e nce throug h a serious of 100
-
or ffia r e slides sho"Lng a c~u a 1 instances of faulty "ooc -joisted
con stru.ction . "These buildings are bui1 t to co11apse :i.n.,.ard
wh e n ;;;,utted bv fire" • he said • "a nd you know on \::HOM ---the
f i r e fi.g,hter ...
C H E ~ T R E C (Cheoica1 Transporta t ion Emer g ency C e nt e r ) is a
natTona T T nTornation faci1ity (operated around t he c1ock ) to
provi de i~-cdi a te . on-site a ssista nce to the scene of a c hemic al.
transportation acc ident. John C. Zerc her ( ~nufa cturin g Chemist
A s soc iation) r elated to the con fe renc e . Then . maki.n g a n actual.
to1 1 free phone ca11 (S00 -424 -9300) from the a uditorium s t age
to Che~t r e c i.n •.:ashingt o n. D . C •• the speaker demons trat ed how
f i r e services can obtain i~ediate inf o~a tion as t o properties
and hazards of c hemic als involved in a n a cc ident to deterr.>ine
what first s t eps shou1d be ta ·en to c ont r o1 the emergency.
CA PTA"l~ RALPH S!-1ART (Ca t e r pi.11ar Tra ctor Co.) gave the a udience
an actual. de~ons tr a tion of audio-visual. me t hods used by his
com;:>any to "'d r i.ve hor:1e" t':-\e i.m;:>o rta nc e of fire prevention and
fir e safety to indus tr ial. p1ant emp1oyees . showi.ng a c tua1 ~azardous c onditions with resu1tant probab1e fires and exp1osions.
FI RE CH1 C F ALLE~ HULETT. aided by a series o f attract i.ve s1ides.
in detail. desc ribed the nany innovations and ideas of his FD ••• in
recruitnent ex~~s ••• training r equirements ••• specia11Y, desi~ncd
equipment and a c ooprehensive "pre-f i re p1an program" cons >-sting
of inspection diagr~~s and pictures of a11 1ar ge industria1-
commercia1 business of a modern FD o f the seventies.
H ENRY D . SNITH (TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY) gave the audience a c1ose
1 ook a t n ew methods o f quick fi.re attac k using 1 a rge diame ter
hose (5 and 6 i.nch). pumping 2000 G PM at pre ssures of 200-225 p.s.i.
- 2 -
•
\
--
~'"32x
-
-
-
-
0 -
------~
''IS T !~'IS V O'-'R L .~.s T .".L.·.:::·?'' Bruc e -::. T ccl. (:-:Fr. ) i.ntroduc.cd thi.s
so~~er subjec t o~ f i=c =~=~te= Cc ~ths ~y r c~d~n ~ to t he ~u icnc a
a shoe ·!.n ;;ly lo:1.;::. !"1."..1-:,e -::-o!: r:.c ·.:s a c.c o':...l nts of a ctu u.l :;:ortall.ti.cs ,
bo:h to v o,untccr anC ~a~~ !:!.r~~c n ••• ns h e =c~~~d eC c o nferees :
"·.:c:::c l~ill i"":ore ::-:.e n i.n :!oi.s occ t...:po t :lon tha n a r c k.illcc::! i n a ny othe~!''
Th cv e re kL ll ed he s..:l~c::!. ~ E C -~ l" S E they C i7ht f ~r ••• n re
subject to e:x tr e~es of p ~yS!.C .o.T Cf'"f'or t: a nc::! psycholo _;;.:.cal t E:ns ion •••
are ofte n too ol d ••• a =e not i.n best physical cond i:~o n ••• arc
v i ct i~s o f -r tor o cc :~e n:s ••• are noL t rc1ned to protect th crnsc l. res •••
or ••• ~r c :oo h ns :y , c o r.fL de!"1.t or c areless . Then , ~s~n g pictures of
~ct u~: Cire s c cr.cs , Teele held the ~udie nc c i n rapt a ttenti on as
h e fi.reC c -:..J es ~io n af ::.e =-r:ues ti.on .. do you do th is?' or .. Do you do
tha t"?'• as he poi.nted to d.:tngerous pr.::tctices """h i ch th ese fire sce=-tcs
r evealed .
J\SSISTA:IT CH IE F J . V. J . .<'.C K50N (Orl 2nd o . Fl a.. FD Tr •g Div.) gave
FD I C an out l~n e f o =-sett~n~ u~ e model FD training p=-ograo in -
c or poratin& three basic c a te &ories. n a~cl y. r~cru L t trai n i n b ···in -
service t=-ai n i ~g ••• ~r.d spccLal train i n &• He descr ibed the sub-
jec t na tt e ~ fa=-e3ch of these c a t c ~ori cs s~at~n g th e ::. the p ro~=am
shou l d in,-ol'\."e a certain a."'Tlou nt of com petition keyed to motiva ti.on
o !:' the stt...:dcnt .
C O::>.TE !<E!.S RECSn'E D A SP:".R KLING REVI B: OF FI RE SEAS.CH "'"'JD RESCUE
tr 2i n i n ~ ~ro c cdurcs AS Ch ie f J o hn DeJong (La~ewood . Colo . FD) ••• Ki th
th e aid of sliCes ••• co'\.·ercd the sub j e c t s of ~anp o• ... ·e r re nui r e""'lents.
n e c essary eoui~~e nt. a nd net hods o f sea r c h i n g out and extrac ting
f i re victi ~s fr o~ buildi n ~s .
A ft e rnoon '\-.:Or'L::shop sessions , .. ·ere h eld from 1 :30 P.l"-f. to 4:30 P .. l-1 .
As Chief . I a ~=e nded s~ops ~ncludin g adm~nist rati ve problems such
as na n?o ~e r d ~str i b ut~on. f i r e house re -locations. rev ~si on of
persornel h i rin ;; ste-:-tda rds. h~r i.:-~g o= m inor i t ies , v a c a t ion .o.nd
s"cl;:: leave . di5c.inlin..-:. and pav ol a n problems. !·lany uni<'!ue ideas
were dis cus sed i n dealin& with these o roblems .
C apt . l'!"cCa rty attend i n g ""·orkshop sess~ons invol ving training
pra ct ices . aids . p rog ra.'ll rra teria.l. e tc . • most of ._vhi.ch Kill be
included Ln ~etai.l in t he transcript of workshop s es sions to follow .
D E V !':LOPXE~T S Dt:!":ING 19 70 HAVE SHATTE RE D .• ~N ILLuSIO.' that the
prob lcns ~~ ~~c ~~~ u~r est h a s dLsappeared or even dimin ished •. ~jar
G e n eral ~ouis R . K a~sey (P rovost ~~rsha 1 ., U .S . A~y ) warned conferees
as he explained the work o£ th e Depart~cnt of Defense industrial
defense p rog ru-n . ''The thr ea ts of bombi n g s . a rson , and other physi.c .al
acts of destruction .an d disruption are bec o min g m ore prevalent in
industry ." h e. said . ''and t.hcre is no panacea ••• no mag ic f orrnu1a. ••• for
th i s comp lex situ.ation that '\V.i.l l produce i mmedia te results .'' He urged
full c ooperation of the fire servic e in the implementation o f
industrial defense oeasures .
-3 -
• •
-
-
-
-
-
0 -
C ,..'\PT;'\.T~ S .~ft.J EL S . COBB (.lo=fo1~::., Va .) c.o.11ed u-;-on f i..re officers and
instruc::.ors to rid thC<-:-'SLl'\.·cs o£ ''a p a!:.~1.y , procrasti.:-:a.ti.on 7 and
ind .if=e=en.c(:;;:·• to· .... ·orc! ::.ra~~:!..r .;. p roc;ra:-.s .i-:-t arso~ detection . ..e are
1i.,·i.n ~ .in. a. soc :!..ety t h a t h a s produc ed a ne\ ... type of revoluti.onnry
cr i~inal,' he said. point.in~ ou t ~hat 173 suspi ci.o ~s o= ~rson fires
occur e a c h C .:::t -i.-:-1. ~ .. -::: 1_· .S . '' ,..'\. fire rec rui.t o!:ten recc..:._,-~s ~ess than
t KO hours ' i.r:s::.r~c..::. .:...o':"l :!..n a rson detection anG ni.nc c.i·--:t....s out: of ten
th~s is the last he hears on the subject unti1 r etireme nt,'-he said .
'~fen n eed to be pro p erly trained in arson :investig.a.::.ion and detection
if N·e are to stem the ri.s::_~g; t .i.de of s e t fires."
FIRE P:-l.OT E CTION ••• FIRE FIGHTI~G ••• A~ RESC UE I:--."VOLV ING HIGH RISE
BUIL DI .~Gs c a..-:-:e i...n fo-:::-clo se e na~y s i.s by four oual:i.fi..ed <>-uthori...ti.es
on th i s ,&ene r al s~J.'b j ect :.atter. CII =ST E~ ~:. SCIII ?~-~:: (Schirmer
E n ~.ince r :i n.~ Corp .) defi.n~d 2 hi.g h ri.se building as "one .i.n " ... ~hi e
fir e ~ust be fought internal~y because of he ight'• and revi.e'\.:ed
vari.ous p rot e cti.'\."C features ""'·hi..c h r::ust be bui..lt -in (smoke t:o¥o.·ers.
st ~nCpi~es . s~oke and firE detection syste~s . elevator controls.
etc.) for life safety and e~ress faci..liti.es .
G . t .. : •. !ORG .'\X (Goddard S~ace F1i.s ht Cent e r. Greenbel.t. 1'-fd .) described
how volunt ee r personnel c a n be trained and i nt egrated into a multi -
un it fire ser,-lce o~ganizati.on to meet lar&e nanpo"er reaui.rcments.
He cited the exan?1e of the Goddard C e nter which is protected by
the F.ire Se rv.ic.e of r~=in c e Georges County, composed of paid day me n
"tnd volunteers serving evenin.t;s,. ni e;hts. ho1iday s and on weekends ...
·'The volunteers pro,-ide equip::nent, manpower and enthusiasm,. and ""'e
receive good fire protection from this arrangement,.'' he concluded ...
CI..AUDE DORSEY, (K.C. Ne1...:s -Pub1ic Affairs Dir.) recommended. without
coo perat~on, training, and und ers tanding. ~e could both be hurt.
the firemen because ne1..:srnen g ot in their 1.vay and harnpered their
'"'or!<. the ne;.··s pe o ole bec au se they cou1d not c;et the best possible
film of a Crarr.atic story. The last thing your firemen need in a
dange rous fire situation i.s to have to rescue a newsman." he said.
"Before proble-ms .e rise, sit do, ... -n ,,,.i.th ne1..vs editors ••• if possible.
with r epor ter s and c~~eramen ....... and go over the ground rules. Know
and understand each other. ••
'W'm ... A. Harntlton,. Ftre Chief
Del B. 1\'lcCa..rt:y,. Training Officer
•
• •
•'
r 32x
•
•
•
TO:
FRO~:
DATE:
C harle s B . Carroll , Jr .,
•
0 -
Direc~or of
l.
c:ou ... .:c.L.. • -~··: ~ ""•'-
CT'T"":': OF E GLEWOOD, C •
L"tilicies
Larry Thoopson, ~aste ~ater Superintendent
~rch 31 ,. 19-2
SUBJECT: ~acer Pollution Co n~rol Federation C onference ,
Wa s hington D.C., ~arch 14 , 1972
The confere nce ~a s caLled t o discuss the future of the Federation's MANFORCE
(Manpower for Clean Environmen t ) as it relates to local,. state and national
goals in water pollution control.
MANFORCE is the Federation's program to provid e mor e t echnically qualified
personnel for operatin g and =ain taining the Sa t ion 's ~astew ater treatment plants.
Xt covers the gaout from recruioment, through certification and career progres -
sion, to placement in varying capacities of the treatment function.
Three main point s ~ere discussed.
Should HAN FORCE be implem en t ed as
(1) it is pr esent~y conceived, as a program of the Federation.
(2) an independent nati o nal program .
(3) revised to the extent that it could provide an attainable program of
the Federa ti.o·n .
Present at the meeting ~ere:
Heinz Russelmann, Vice Chairman , Per sonnel Advanc~ment Committee National
Sanitation Foundation (NSF).
John Voe g tle, Manager of Educa tion and T raining , W.P.C .F .
J. E. Meers, Superintendent Sani tary District of Bloom Township,
Chicago Heishts , Illinois .
John Bettis, Commissioner of Public Work s , Charleston, South Carolina
Carmen Cuari no, Commissioner of Water Pollution Control, Philadelphia, Pa.
Joseph Harlon, private industry
R. A. Danham , Executive Sec retary W.P .C .F., Was hington, D.C.
L. E. Thompson, Wastewater Superintendent , Englewood, Colorado
Speaking to the issues were:
Joseph La g n ese , President, W.P.C.F.
Eugene Jensen, Deparbnent assistant administrator of Water Progr~s, EPA
The day was spent in discussing the pros and cons of ~~FORCE, resu1ting in
reinforc eme nt of the deci sion to keep the program as an arm of W .P.C.F.
Specific attention was devoted to insuring that the stated aims of HANFORCE
did not conflict with the W .P.C.F. constitution •
Much tim e was spent on discussing ways and means to attract people into the
industry and to keep them there .
The conferee s authorized a study directed toward operators instead of engineers,
because most developme ntal processes have been geared toward the latter group.
•
• •
1'32X
-
,
•
•
•
•
0 -
Pa 5,e 2
~~no to Charles B. Carroll,
EPA officials indLcated the funding considerations for the ~riting of curricula
and t:.he construction of a training cenc.er i.n eac.h st:.at:.e.
The next meeting is set:. for June 5, 1972 in Chicago.
•
• •
~'32x
•
•
•
REGULAR MEETING
ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
MA.R.CH 21., 1.9 7 2 c ou
c rr.-o9!' F' '
T h e meet~n g wa s cal.l.ed to order by Cha ~rman Harder at 5 :03 P.M.
Membe r s present : Harder, Hock, Horton, Ro•val.l Babcock, Sent~.
Members absent: Dhori.ty., Lay.
Other o ff i ci.al.s present: Charl.es B. Carrol.!., Jr., Director of Uti.l.i.ties.
1. INTENT TO SERVE NEW CHERRYRI.IX;E WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT,. ACROSS FROM
ST. MARY'S SCHOOL, EAST OF SOUTH UNIVERSITY.
Hr. Carro l.!. pre s ented a letter from the Cherryri.dge Water and Sanitation Di s trict
request i ng Engl.e~od approve a connector's acreement for trea~nt of sewage by
t he C i ty of Enslewood. The district comprise s the area that encompasses the NW~
o f s e c t i on 1.2,. Township 5 South, Range 68 West, Arapahoe County, Col.orado, serving
approximately 100 s ingl.e fam~ly residents.
Hr. Horton moved,
Mr. Rosva11 seconded, That the Water and Sewer Board recommend to C~ty Counc~l. that,
upon rece~pt of ev~dence of aareement between Cherrymoor South
San~tat~on D~str~ct and Cherryr~dae San~tat~on D~str~ct for
carr~age of sewage throuah the 1~ne of Cherrymoor South San-
~tat~on D~str~ct, the connector's aareement between the C~ty
of En.al.ewood and Cberryri.d&e Sa.ni.t.a.t~on Di.stri.ct, be approved
and executed.
The moti.on passed unani.mousl.y.
2. UTILXTY ACCOUNTI-NG SYSTEM
Mr. Carro11 presented a l.etter to the Board ~n response to a request for expl.anati.on
of the Deparbnent's accounti.n& system. He i.ncl.uded a memo from the past D~rector of
Fi.nance, Steven A. Lyon, stati.ng the ori.&i.n and i.ntent of the present accounti.ng
system. No spec~al. funds are set up i.n the Ot~l.i.ti.es system except when fo~ed by a
speci.al. bond i.asue, however the fund baLance shou1d never fa11 be1ow $200,000 to be
ab1e to meet any emergency.
Mr. Harder i.nqu~red as to why a percentage i.s charged for changeovers when, i.n h~s
opi.ni.on, cbana;eovers are expenses and not i.mprovements. Hr. Carro11 exp1ai.ned the
fu.nd bal.ance ~s decl.~ni.n& and these payments parti.a11y offset the cost of 1ayi.ng new
li.nes. Hr . Harder then tab1ed the questi.on unti.l the next meeti.n& to allow the Board
ti.me for further study.
3. BOAT1NG AND SAFETY REQUIREMENTS ON McLELLAN B.ESERVO'I..R.
Hr . carro11 read a l.etter from Jerry Royther, A3si.stant Di.rector of the Parks and
Recreati.on Department, outl.i.ni.ng the dates the reservoi.r woul.d be used for a Re-
creat~on Deparbnent program of canoe safety and the condi.t~ons for i.ts use.
Hr . R o ytber entered at 5:32 P.H. and was i.ntroduced to the Board.
A£ter consi.derab1e di.scussi.on as to po11uti.on hazard, precedent setti.na and health
regul.at~on.a ,
Hr. Lay moved •
Hr. Babcock seconded, That the Board approve the Parks and Recreati.on Department use
of HcLel.l.an Reservoi.r as outl.i.ned. Tbi.s use to be for 1972
onl.y and subject to revi.ew.
The moti.on passed unani.mous1y.
•
• •
I' 32X
-
•
•
•
•
-2-
Hr. Royther than_ked the Board and stated that be woul.d l..nqui.re as to the Se.te Heal.th
Department re&ulat~ons ~ such matters and wi.l.l. keep Mr. C.rrol.l. advi.aed as to hi.s
Department•a proaresa.
Mr. Royther l.eft th.e meett.na at 5:50 P.H ..
4. OTHER TOPICS.
Mr. Carrol.l. reported that a Mr. Gol.dy had contacted Hr . Di.al. i.n regard to obt.ai.nl.ng
emergency rel.i.ef i.n c.ounecti.D& to the Greenwood Vi.l.l.aae Sani.tati.on Oi.stri.ct se~r
al.tho he was not i.ncl.uded i.n the Di.stri.ct. Mr. C.rrol.l. asked the Board•s pl.easure
in al.l.owi.ng a physi.cal. connection. provi.di.n& a suppl.ement to i.ncl.ude hi.s property was
presented to Councl.l. at the next meetl.na.
Mr. Lay moved •
Mr. Horton seconded. That perm~aai.on be aranted to provi.de Hr. Goldy emeraency servi.ce
pendl..na a auppl.ement to i.ncl.ude hi.a property i.n the Greenwood
Yi.l.l.aae Sani.t.at~on D~atr~ct.
Mr. Carro11 th~n reported that the ~ appraLsal. of the 160 acres of 1and south of
McLe11an reservo~r was $S62.000 -~thLn $20.000 of the orLa~nal. appraLsal..
A1ter consLderabl.e dLscuaa~on •••
Mr • Horton moved •
Mr. R.osval.l. seconded. ~t the Board se11 the l.an.d at a n .et val.ue of not less tha_n
the MA..I appra:lsed val.ue.
Ayes: Senti.. Rosva11. Horton.
Na.y s: Lay • Babcock • Harder
AbstaLnL~&= Mock
Mr . Lay then moved the mot:lon be tabl.ed for further d:lscussLon.
The motLon passed uu.nLmously.
Hr. Carrol.l. ~1.1 make a compar:lson summary of the acqu:ls:lt:lon pr:lces and se11Lng
pr:lces of ground form.erl.y own.ed by the Ut:ll.:lti.es Department.
Hr. Carro11 next reported that the proposed treated water storaae tank w~11 not be
ava:llabl.e for use tbi.s season. Water experts fa•l. we are enteri.n& a dry cycle. so
~e Water Departm.e..n.t may expect a l.arae cleman.d thi.s su:mmer.
Mr . Carrol.!. then showed the Board a chart of the expected completi.on dates of various
phaaea of construction of the sewer pl.ant addi.t:lon. The chart showed the work to be
beh:lnd schedul.e for some phaaea. however. the contractor baa aaaured hi.m that the
whol.e project coul.d be compl.eted on t~me.
Hr. Harder then requested the Board members m.ke a l.i.st of persons i.n.~erested i.n
becomi.ng a Board member. to be presented to coun.ci.l. after the next board meeti.na.
Mr. Lay moved •
Hr. Horton seconded. That the meeti.ng be adjourned •
The meeti.n& adjourned at 6:27 P.M •
,
• •
-
•
•
•
REGULAR MEET ING OF THE BOARD OF CAREER SERVICE COMMISSIONERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD~ COLORADO
MARCH 16. 1972 7 :00 P -M·
PRESENT: H. R. Braun~ E. L-A us£ah1 , B . Kimbrough. J. F. Murphy
ALSO PRESENT: Capta~n Ed White
THE FOLLOWING MOTIONS WERE PASSED FOR APPROVAL:
1. The minutes of the last regular meeting.
2 -The following ne~ hires:
TITLE & DEPARTMENT
GRADE
& STEP
KrNNEY. Joseph J.
McDANIEL, C larence
McELWAIN, W illiam L.
RUSSELL, Ri.ta E.
Custodian. Bldg. Maint.
Effective 3 /10/72
Tra~fic Maintenanceman
Effective 3 /1 /7 2
Street Maintenanceman
Effective 3 /S /72
Clerk-Typist. Police
Effective 3 /1 /72
3. The fo11owing terminations:
HORTON. Lowe11 A.
VANDERKAMP. Gregory
WILSON, John
Maintenanceman. Parks
Effective 2 /11/72
Maintenanceman, Traffic
Effective 3/20/72
Maintenanceman, Traffic
Effective 3 /10/72
4. The £o11owing probationary to permanent status change without
increase in pay:
M.OR.R:t.S, Richard Communications Supervisor
Effective 1 /1 /72
:L3A
:L7A
:L 7A
:L2A
:L7B
:L7A
:L7B
27B
5. The Board ~oved to concur ~ith the Director of Community Develop
ment•s request to extend ~e following employee•s probat1onary per1od:
YOUNG, Barbara Planning Assistant
Community Development
6. The fo11owing anni versary increases effective 3 /1/72:
DA.DDIS, Nick A.
MCLENNAN, Donald J.
•
Patro~an 4th C1ass ~r
Patro~an 3rd C1ass
Patro1.man. 4th Class to
Patro1.man 3rd Class
•
2:LB
2l.A
2:LD
2l.A
210
13
to
to
\ !
"!'
• •
r 32 x
•
•
•
6-(Continued)
NAME TITLE & DEPARTMENT
REYNOLDS, Char1es J.
YANCEY. Edna E.
Patro1.n\an 4th C1 ass to
Patro1.n\an 3rd Class
Parking Enforcement Maid
7. The £o11owing anniversary increases effective 4/1/72:
B.A..LM.ER~ John E.
KAPAUN, Pau1 F.
MCCOLLUM~ Howard W.
MEYERS, Char1es E.
PINO~ Max M.
VINCENT, J. D.
Patrolman 2nd C1ass to
Patro~man 1st C1ass
Engineering Aide II
Meter Reader
Uti1iti.e.s
P1a.nt Operator
Uti1ities
Patro~an 2nd C1ass
Patrolman 1st C1ass
Maintenan.ce.m.an
Street
B. The following anniversary increase effective 4/4/72:
COX, L1oyd G. F ireman 2nd C1ass to
Fi.reman 1st C1aas
9. The fo11ow~ng anniversary increase effective 4/B/7 2:
RAHN, Warren I. Patro1man 3rd C1ass
Patro1man 2nd C1ass
GRADE
& STEP
2l.A
21.0
l.2C
1.20
2l.F
22F
l.9C
1.90
1.60
l.GE
20C
200
2l.F
22F
l.7B
l.7C
2l.F
22F
21.0
2l.F
A letter from Mr. Dial concerning the eventual elimination of the
position of Captain/Chief Mechanical Officer at the Fi.re Department
was discussed .
Capt. Ed White, present incumbent in that position, appeared in his
o~n beha1f, main1y at this tLme to request c1arification as to who
his '"boss" is at the present ti..me as he is ternpo:rari1y assigned
-
to the Service Center. He noted that this who1e situation came as
a surprise to him and that around September or October of 1971
Chief Hami..1ton ca11ed him into his office and to1d him what was
going on. Capt. White said that he had received five 1etters from
the City Manager, concerning what he was going to do and that a11 of
them were different. A1though he has been assigned to the Service
Center to train men down there. he has on1y tra~ned one day .
1.4
•
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
'· '!'
• •
'32x
•
•
•
•
Capt. White stated that he has worked for the city for 17 years. feel..s
he is a good worker, and real..l..y enjoys his work. Now be has two or
three bosses and does not know which one to bel..ieve in. Capt. White
expl..ai.ned that he reports to the Fire Department every morning and
i..f there .i.s no m..i.nor work for hi.nl to do there, he then goes to the
Serv ice Center . Chief Ham..i.1ton has to1d Capt. White that he ..i.e
sti11 his boss whi1e Mr. Waggoner says that Capt. White i..s working
for him now . Capt. White said that having to go to the Fire
Department first in the morning makes him 1ate at the Service Center
and that Mr. Waggoner had gotten on to him about this.
Mr. Braun asked if Capt. White 'Was wanting to knCJ!I'W who his ••boss••
rea11y is and Capt. White answered yes. Capt. White a~so said
that he had received one 1etter that said he woul..d be under the
direct supervision o£ Leonard Si1er. When Mr. Murphy asked h~
i..£ th.is had ever been e..xpl..ai.ned to hi.m, be repl..ied no, that
there -as to have been a ~eeting but it 'WaS cancel..1ed. A coupl..e
of days after this he received the l..etter saying he woul..d be
under the supervision of Mr. Sil..er.
Mr. Murphy exp1ained that what the 1etter was trying to say ~as
that Capt. White is tota11y and irrevocab1y responsib1e to the
Garage Foreman but that he does not 1oae anything as to his rank
of Captain in the Fire Department.
Mr. Auafah1 questioned why Capt. White had to report to the Fire
Department if he was to work in the Service Center.
Mr. Braun then recommended that a 1etter be written to the City
Kanager requesting that he write a 1etter to Capt. White c1ari-
fying this situation, and that if the situation is not corrected,
Capt. White shou1d notify Mr. Murphy and he wou1d in turn notify
the Career Service Boa rd.
Capt. White a1so had a 1etter from Mr. Dia1 in which it was stated
that the position of Capt-/Chief Mechanica1 Officer wou1d be
e1~nated and the present incumbent wou1d be reduced in rank.
Capt. White stated that he cou1d not see why this shou1d happen
as he is the senior Captain.
A11 the Board Members expressed concern as to whether or not
C apt. White wou1d sti.11 have a job at the Fire Department when
his temporary assignment was comp1eted. Mr. Braun stated that as
there were four other captains, a11 junior to Capt. White, it
wou1d on1y seem 1ogica1 that one of the junior captains Shou1d
be reduced in rank.
Mr. Murphy said that the main question ~nvo1ved is whether or not
Capt. White is qua1ified to be Shift Captain. Capt. White stated
that the on1y examination he had was ora1 and that even though
he was made Chief Mechanica1 Officer, Chief Sovern took h~ off
his roechanica1 duties and put hLm Ln charge of ahifta .
Discussion ensued.
Mr. Ausfah1 £e1t that the Career Service Board shou1d put its foot
in the door and take action concerning this matter. Rev. Kimbrough
stated that he fe1t if Ed White ~as appointed as senior Captain,
he was appointed :Ln a ..,general.."" sense .
Mr. Braun then read an excerpt from Mr. Dia1"s 1etter of March 16,
1972, which went as fo11ow•,
•
• •
T 32X
•
•
•
•
•• One of the basic: questions that must be reso1ved is the extent
to wh ich Captain White was appointed to his position as a Captain
in a general sense or was appointed to his position as Mechanical
Officer in a specialized sense.•
Mr. Braun then asked if the Board couldn't look at this in the
••general .. sense. that Capt. White came up through the ra..nlcs and
served as a s .hi..ft C aptain.
Mr. Braun then requested that a letter be sent to the C ity Mannger
stating the Board's position in this case.
Rev. Kimbrough also stated that as there is going to be a
hearing in this matter. tie Career Service Board ~ou~d 1Lke to be
advised as to the date. He also stated that if the Career Board
has the power to see that Capt. White is not reduced in rank.
then he has nothing to ~orry about.
Mr. Braun then thanked Capt. Whi...te for br.i.ogi...ng h.i.s prob1em to the
Board. Capt. White expressed his gratitude and sa.i.d that it was
a great re1.i.ef to him just knowing that he had someone behind him.
The next topic of discussion was a 1etter from Mr. Di.a1 requesting
the Board to concur with the restoring of the Detective position to
Grade 24F, with over-tLme pay, effective 3 /16/72 .
Mr. Braun asked M.r. Murphy if he knew for sure that the Detectives
wanted this and Mr. Murphy said no.
Mr. Braun then directed that a 1etter be written to Mr. Di...a1
stating that ~i...a sbou1d be reso1ved under the same condi...ti...ona
as were estab1ished by the Sergeants i...n the January meeting,
i .e. a 1etter from the Detectives requesting this action be taken.
The meeting was adjourned and the next meeting is schedu1ed for
Apr.i.1 20, 1972 .
Recording S ecretary
H ... R ... BRAUN
•
16
• •
T 32X
•
•
Staol.ey H . Dial.
•
0 -
INT£R-OFFICE
MEMORANDUM
DATE: Maiafl:l.,..!·3"1. 1972 ~ •
Crrt' O F c:r,<.a:.....-··c oo.
Flt.OM: K e l.l.s W agg on e r
SU~~~ PAVING DISTRICT NO. 20
•
The h e aring on ass e ssments 1or Paving District No. 20 was bel.d
on Monday . March 27. 1.972. at 8 :00PM ..
The 1ol.l.owiog are comments rel.ative to the protests received
at that bearing:
1. 2000-2300 W. Baker
Mr. Bl.iss. 2060 W. Baker. commented on the d esign o1
Baker in that ice 1orms in the gutter . Attached are
pictures showing the trees which shade the street at
that l.ocation.. Drainage is good , as shown in the photos.
Assessment is correct.
2 .. 400 W. Cornel.l.
Letter :from Fern M. Cox in behal.:f' o:f' her parents (Ada E.
and Al.va T . Summers . 3055 S. Lincol.n) protesting assessment
b ecause it woul.d cause :financia1 hardship. Assessment
is correct_
3. 600 W. Corne11
4.
Letter ~rom Benjamin P . Naiman~ 4428 South Bannock ~
protesting assessment because they are not reasonab1e or
just . Assessment is correct.
soo.fii. Corne11
(a) Letter 1rom John A. Criswe11 in beha11 o1 Caro1ine
B . Weist 9 835 East Corne11 . protesting assessment b e cause
the assessment is not based upon the bene1its accruing 1rom
tbe improvements to the property invo1ved. Assessment is
correct _
(b) Letter 1rom John C. Ho1oubek , 3046 S. C1arkson ~
protesting assessment because it w ou1d cause 1inancia1
hardship. Assessment is correct.
5. 900 East Corne11
(a) Letter 1rom Dona1d Weak1and protesting assessment because
property bas no direct access to Corne11. Assessment is
correct-
•
• •
~'32x
-
-
-
S tanley H. Oia1
March 31. 1972
page 2
-
0 ...
Attached is a map showing subject property in r e lations h ip
to other Weakland ownership an d location o1 property ~rom
Corne 11. Attached a1so are maps showing 1ike sit uat ion s
where assessments were levied in prior districts. A ssessme nt
1o11ows standard side street assessment proceedure.
In revi e win g the Weakland protest we did 1ind an adjacent
property w hich was assesse d too much. The error occurred
in ca1cu1 ating the amoun t o1 square 1ootage £or rear zone
assessment. Th~ property is owned by A. Harlan and Leona
R. Bo11.
(b) Lett e r £rom Stan1ey R . Medsker stating that property
assess e d was so1d to City o£ Eng1ewood. Assessment is
correct.
The City is in the process o£ obtaining a Treasurer•s
Deed to the property and shou1d pay the assessment be£ore
the assessment ro11 is certi£ied to the County . Assessment
amount is $156 .81.
6. 4700 S . Decatur
(a} Letter £rom Windsor B . Wade , Jr .• 2903 W. Layton ,
protesting assessment £or 40 £eet o1 remova1 and rep1acement
o£ curbwa1k. Assessment is correct.
Attached is a picture s howing the sett1ement be1ore con-
struction and the 30 1eet that the contractor put in with
the same prob1em as the ori gi na1 ; and a picture sbow~ng
the resu1ts o£ removing 40 1eet in order to pick up additiona1
grade. Th e contractor did not mis~udge the remova1 but was
instructed to remove the additiona1 10 1eet 1or grade.
(b) Mrs. F e r g u s on . 2740 W. Union , commented on Decatur and
asked questions £or in1ormation. Assessment is correct.
7 . 000 West Lehigh
Lett e r £rom S. R . Andrews representative o1 Contine nta1
Oi1 Company. protesting a portion o£ tota1 assessment as it
re1ates to an abandoned underground tank. The ass essment
1or paving and concrete is correct. There was an assessment
o1 $720.52 made against the property 1or ext ra work necessary
to £i11 an underground tank. The tank was within the street
right-o1-way and we do not know who put it there , when it
was insta11ed or abandoned. whether an encroachment agreement
was made, or whether the City had approved the method o1
abandonme nt . The tank had some o1d oi1 in the bottom and
we assumed it had been us e d by the station as waste oi1
storage. An equitab1e so1ution might be to sp1it the assess-
ment £or th e tank work.
•
• •
-
-
•
•
•
Stanley H . Di.a1
March 31. 1972
page 3
8 . 0 00 West Mans£~e 1d
•
0 .. -
Letter £rom Howard & Eve1yn Ph111ips prot est~og assessment
because work was not needed. Assessment is correct~ 7
9. A11ey betwee n South Acoma St _ and South Broadway --Sc500 bl..ock
south -West Radcl..i£1 Ave. to West Stan£ord Ave.
Letter £rom John W . Geiger ~ Jr.~ Counsel.. £or Agnes Mary
Kinney . protesting assessment £or a11ey since property does
not receive £air bene£its £rom the improvements. Assessment
is correct.
The changes out1ined on the attached recommendation 1ist wi11
c hange the Section A & B Total..s as £o11ows:
Present tot a 1s
Bo11 property
y ~ 7 Third Stoke1y Corp. property
proposed total..s
Total.. Section A & B
Sincere1y ~
/,
/ <~c.. ..._ .. ._/ --,---=,---
Ke11s Waggoner
Director o~ Pub1ic Works
KW:pd
att .
S ection A
$384,727 .68
28 .57
360 .26
$384 ,338.85
Sectio n B
$1.08,421..27
+ 28.57
360.26
$1.08,81.0.1.0
$493 , 1.48. 95
• \ !
'r
II • •
r 32x
•
•
•
•
0 -
RECOllliENDATI ONS
Owner
1 ~ W. J. Dr iver
Adm. o1 V e t. A11airs
Washington . D . C . 20411
(2060 W. Bake r Ave.)
2. Ada E. & Al..va T . Summers
5951 S. Nevada
Littl..etoo , Col..orado 80120
3. Wil..l..iam J. &. Dorothy M.
Brunn e r & B e n~amin P .
Naiman
4428 S. Bannock
Engl..ewood . Col..o. 80110
4a. Carol..ine B . Weist
835 E. Corn e11..
Engl..ewood . Col..o . 80110
4b . John C . & L e na Bo1oubek
3046 S . Cl..arks on
Eng1ewood . Col..o . 80110
Sa. A . Harl..an & L e ona R. Bol..l..
8500 W . Bowl..es Ave.
Litt1eton . Col..o. 80123
(3059 S. O gden St.)
Sb. Stanl..ey R . Medsker
6a . Windsor B . Jr . &. Mae
Lenor e Wade
2903 W. Layton Ave .
Engl..ew ood ~ Col..o . 801..10
6b. Maye M. F e r g u s on
2740 W. Union
Engl..ewood. Col..o. 80110
Lot Bl..ock Subdivision Action
13 3 Soutbl..awn Denied
Garde ns Anne x
23-3 S .G . Haml..ins Denied
24 Addition
1-2 2 Tay1ors Add. Den:l.od
3 2 Tay1ors Add. Denied
Beg . 16' E o:l:. SE cor o:l:. Den ied
Lot 25 , Dobbins Resub ; th
E 166'; th N 202.9'; th w
166'; th s 202 .9' to beg.
35-4-68
A tr. in SW* o:l:. SW l o:l:. NWt Denied
o~ Sec . 35-4-68 Desc. as
comm . at a pt. on E 1ioe
o1 C1arkson St . 32o.s• N o1
E ~ W ceo. 1ine o1 sd. Sec . 35;
tb E 143•; tb N 75•; tb W
143•; th S 75' to pob being
that part o1 b1k. 5 Evanston
Bdwy Add. now vac.
N so• o1 s 1oo• o1 N 375•
o1 E 163• o1 B1k. 6 Evans-
too Bdwy Add y now vacated
in swt o:t:. NW l ex. E 30'
35-4-68
separate memo on this one
28 Ceotennia1
Acres 4tb F1g .
1rom $100
to $71.43
Denied
Denied Be~. 190• W o1 NE cor o1
NW~ o:l:. SEt Sec. 8-5-68 ;
tb. s 500.45•; th w 286.4•;
tb N 7°32' E 5os .7•; thE
220• to beg. ex. sts. 8-5-68
•
• •
,32X
•
•
•
Recommendations
page 2
March 31, 1972
Owner
7. Third Stoke1y Corp.
c /o Contin e ota1 Oi1 Co .
Tax Dept .
1755 G1enarm P1.
Denver. Co1orado 80202
8. Howard & Eve1yn Phi11ips
1031 Pa1mer Rd.
R<>ck1edg e. F1a. 32955
(3900 S _ Acoma St _)
9. Agnes &lary Kinney
706 S. Washington
Denver. Co1orado 80209
(4455 S. Broadway)
•
• -
Lot B1ock
25-8
28
1-2 1
N 5• 16
37 &
38-42
Subdivision Action
Ham. & Ki11ies :trom
Bdwy. Hts. $3019.22
to
$2658 .96
Jacksons Denied
Bdwy. Hts.
Wo11enwebers Denied
Bdwy Hts.
2nd Add.
• •
• T 32X [
•
•
•
IXTRODt:CED AS A BILL BY COL"X CI~ _,wo==MAN:::._...;HE==NN:.::I:.::N:::G:::..._ __________ _
A BILL FOR
fu~ ORDI~~~C E VACATI~G THE EASEMENT IN THE NORTH 16 FEET OF
LOT 11. OXFORD HEIGHTS. SECOND FILING. ARAPAHOE COUNTY. COLORADO.
WHEREAS, ~h ere present1y ex~sts an easement in the
north 16 feet of Lo t 11 , Oxford Heights, Second Filing, lying
1n the~~ 1/4 SE 1/4 of Sect1on 4. TSS. R68W. of the 6th P.M .• Arapahoe County, Colorado; and
WHEREAS, neither public necessity nor convenience
requires continued maintenance of this easement; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Co~ission of the
City of Englewood has heretofore recommended that the e asement
be vacated . subject to the dedication of the north 30 feet
of the 8 foot utility easement on the west line of the
property described above; and
WHEREAS, said dedication has been made by deed under date of March 27, 1972.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. as fo11ows:
Section 1. That the follo~ng described ease~ent
1ocated within the City of Eng1ewood. Arapahoe County.
Co1orado. be and the same is hereby vacated. to-wit :
The north 16 feet of Lot 11. Oxford Heights.
Second F111ng. 1y1ng 1n the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 of
Section 4. T5s. R68w. of the 6th P.M .• Arapahoe
County. Co1orado.
on. the Introduced. read in fu11 and passed on first reading
3rd day of Apri.1 197 2.
of Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on t:he
A p ri.1 1972. 6th day
Mayor
At::t::est :
ex off1c1o C1ty C1erk
I • W.i.11i.a.m L . McDivi.tt • do hereby cert::.i..fy
that: the above and foregoing is a true. accurate and comp1et::e
copy of a B111 for an Ord1nanceri'>'h88efte ---=3:.:r:.;d::_ day of _:.;A:.op:.:r:;.;i=1 ____ _ 1972.
ex off1c1o C1ty C1erk
II • •
I' 32X
•
•
•
•
I~TRODUCED AS A BILL BY CO U~CI~WO=MAN==....:HEN=:.:;an==:.....------------
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINA.t'JCE VACATING THE EASEME!>IT IN THE NORTH 16 FEET OF
LOT 11. OXFORD HEIGHTS. SECOND FILING. ARAPAHOE COUXTY.
COLORADO .
WHEREAS, there present1y ex~sts an easement Ln the
north 16 feet of Lot 11, Oxford Heights, Second Fi1ing, 1ying
in the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 of Section 4, T5S, R68W, of the 6th P.M.,
Arapahoe County , Co1orado; and
WHEREAS, neither pub1ic necessity nor convenience
requires continued maintenance of this easement; and
WHEREAS, the P1anning and Zoning Commission of the
City of Eng1ewood has heretofore recommended that the easement
be vacated, subject to the dedication of the north 30 feet
of the 8 foot uti1ity easement on the west 1ine of the
property described above; and
WHEREAS, said dedication has been made by deed
under date of March 27. 1972.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. as fo11o~s:
Section 1. That the fo11o~ng described easement
1ocated ~thin the City of Eng1ewood. Arapahoe Co~nty.
Co1orado. be and the same is hereby vacated. to-~t :
The north 16 feet of Lot 11. Oxford Heights.
Second F~1~ng. 1y~ng ~n the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 of
Section 4. TSS. R68W. of the 6th P.M .• Arapahoe
County. Co1orado.
Introduced. read in fu11 and passed on first reading
on the
of
Attest:
3:rd day of Apr.i.1 1972.
Pub1ished as a B~11 for an OrdLnance on the
1972.
Mayor
ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk
6 <oh day
I. Wi11.i.am L. McDivitt
that the above and foregoing is a t~e.
copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinancev-Pgii8 the
1972.
• do hereby certify
accurate and comp1ete
3rd day of _..;.A.:.po;r=..=i-;::1 ____ _
ex off~c~o C~t y Clerk
•
• •
I'
-
-
-
-
I:STROD t.:CED AS A BILL BY CO~CIL~ WO!!S!.!':J!IAN!!!!_..!!HENN!E!!!l!.rNG£!!5£... __________ _
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINA.."'C E V A CATI~G THE EASEMENT IN THE N O RTH ~6 FEET OF
L O T ~2 . O XFORD HEIGHTS. SE C O ~ FILING . ARAPAHOE CO UNTY.
COL ORADO .
WHEREAS ~ there present1y exists an easement in the
north 16 feet of L ot 12 , Oxford Heights, Second Fi1ing ,
~yLng L n the NE ~/4 SE ~/4 of SectLon 4. TSS. R68W. of the
6th P.M., A r apahoe C ounty , Co1orado ; and
WHEREAS, no pub1ic purpose ~11 be served by the
retention of the ease~ent ; and
WHEREAS ,.. the P1anni..ng and Zoning Cou:o:n..:i..ssi.on of the
City of Eng1ewood has heretofore recommended that the
easement be vacated.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. as fo~~ows:
Section 1. That the fo11o~ng described easement
1ocated ~thin the City of Eng1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado,
be and the same is hereby vacated, to-wit:
The north 16 feet of Lot 12, Oxford Heights,
Second Fi~Lng. ~ying Ln the NE ~/4 SE ~/4 of
Section 4, T5S, R6SW, of the 6th P.M., Arapahoe
County, Co1orado.
on. the
\ntroduced, read in fu11 and passed on f~rst read~ng
___ r_d __ day of Apri.l. 1972.
of
F-pr i.~~:l.shed a~9 ;-2 Bi~~ --------------· .
for an Ord~nance on the 6th day
Mayor
Attest:
ex officio City C~erk
Wi..11:L=u:.& L . :1c:Oi.v i..tt I, • do hereby cert~fy
that the above and foregoLng ~s a true, accurate and camp1ete
copy of a Bi~~ for an Ordinance. ~y£roduced. re~dr~ fu~~ and
passed on first reading on the day of P ~972.
ex off:l.cio City C~erk
•
• •
I' 32X
•
•
•
INTRODU C E D AS A BILL BY COUNCIU~ wo!iS2.0.'>Niill.ILHENNH!lWI.l+NG!;J!!!L __________ _
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINAl.~C E VACATING THE EASEMENT IN THE N ORTH 16 FEET O F
LOT 12. OXFORD HEIGHTS. S EC OND FILING. ARAPAHOE COUNTY.
COL ORADO.
WHEREAS~ there present1y exists an easement in the
north 16 feet of L ot 12, Oxford Heigh ts, Second Fi1~ng,
1y~ng ~n the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 of Sect~on 4. TSS. R68W. of the
6th P.M., Arapahoe County, Co1orado; and
WHEREAS, no pub1ic purpose ~11 be served by the
retention of the easement; and
WHEREAS, the P1anning and Zoning Commission of the
City of E ng1e~ood has heretofore recommended that the
easement be vacated.
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. as fo11ows:
Sect ion 1. That the fo11o~ing described easement:
1ocated w1t:hin the City of Eng1ewood, Arapahoe County, Co1orado,
be and the same is hereby vacated, to-w1t :
on the
of
Attest:
The north 16 feet of Lot: 12, Oxford Heights,
Second F~1~ng. 1y~ng ~n the NE 1/4 SE 1/4 of
Section 4, TSS, R68W, of the 6th P.M., Arapahoe
County, Co1orado.
~n5roduced, read i£ fu11 and passed on first reading
___ r __ day of :A p r 1 1972.
for an Ordinance on the day
Mayor
ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk
W 1..1l.. •!a L -Hc::Di..vi..tt
I. • do hereby certify
that the above and forego~ng is a true. accurate and comp1ete
copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance. ~5roduced. re~~x ~ fu11 and
passed on first reading on the day of 1972 .
ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk
•
• •
r
•
•
•
I~""TROD C CED AS A BILL BY C "l.c.:CIUIA..."i: LAY
BY AUTHO~TY
:>RDI~~-cE ~o. IL , SERIES OF 1972
A..~ ORDINA.-.:CE A:·:ENDL"G TITLE XV '69 E.M.C., BY ADDI ."G
DEFINI7IO::s, I.-CREASI="G THE APPOINTED ME'"!BERSHIP TO
THE WATER A..''D SEWER BOARD, ESTABLISH il<:G DATES FOR THE
DELI NQUE;..;cy OF WATER BILLS, '"lAKING PROVISI0:.-1 FOR :-!OTICE
OF SHUT-OFF AFTER DELINQUENCY; ABOLISHING "VACANCY
INSPECTIOX" CHARGES; I~CREASING CHARGES FOR WATER TURN-OFF
OR TUR.~-ON SERVICES; Al.:THORIZING CUT-OFF FROM MAIN TO BE
PERFO~IED EITHER BY A STATE LICENSED A..~D BONDED PLUMBER
OR CITY HATER DIVISIO~ PERSO~-:-."'EL; REQUIRING SERVICE PIPE
TO CO NFOR.'1 TO THE u:<!IFORM BUILDING CODE SPECIFICATIONS
AND STANDARDS; DISCONTil\.O:.ri.NG THE SALES OF CERTAI N MATERIALS
BY THE WATER DIVISI0:.-1; REQUIRING ALL CONNECTIONS WITH THE
CITY WATER SYS= TO BE MADE BY STATE LICENSED AND BONDED
PLUMBERS A..~D REPEALING ALL ORDIN&~CES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES
IN CO NFLICT HEREWITH.
BE IT ORDAI NED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEt-K>OD,. COLORADO,. as fo11ow-s:
Sect~on I. That Sect~on IS-1 -I of the C~ty Code
en.t:i..t1ed ''Def::Lni.tions'' is hereby amended to read as fo11ows:
1..5-I-1: DEFINITIONS
As used ~n th~s tit1e,. the fo11o~ng words and
phrases sha11 have the £o11owing meanings:
(a) C~ty : The C~t y of Engiewood, Coiorado, actLng
by and through ~ts C~ty Coun.c~1 under the Home
lb.11e c ·ha.rter Statutes and Ord~ances of said
C~ty of Engiewood.
(b) C~ty Manager: Chief administrat~ve off~cer
of the C~ty of Eng1ewood.
(c) ~rector of Ut~I~t~es: The du1y des~gnated C~ty
Off~c~a1 through whom the C~ty Connc~1 and the
C~t y Manager may exercise their powers.
(d) Water D~~s~on: The sect~on of the Ut~1~t~es
Department under and through which the municipa1
~ater w-orks syste~ is operated under the direct1on
of the C~ty Counc~1. C~ty Manager and D~rector
of Ut~1~t~es •
-1-
• •
I' 32X
•
•
•
•
(e) Water Syst:e=:t: A11 p1ant: faci.1it:ies and dis-
tribution m ains owned and operated by the City
of Eng1eW"ood.
(f) Bonded P1umber: A person 1icensed as a Master
P1umber under the 1aws of the State o f Co1orado
and under bond to the City as provided herein.
(g) License: Sha11 mean the pe~i ss ion to use
~ater fo r the purpose specified in the authorit y
to use.
(h) Licensee: Any person. corporation. governmenta1
aut hor~ty or agency authorized to use water
under a 1icen se.
(~) Service P~pe : Al1 p~ping 1awfu11y ~nsta11ed
betwee n the water main (or an extension thereof )
and the 1ice~see•s property 1ines.
(j) Premises: A tract of 1and with bui1dings thereon.
S ect~on 2. That Sect~on 15 -2-1 of the C~ty Code
entit1ed "Board Es tab1i.shed" is hereby amended to read as
fo11ows :
15-2-1 : BOARD ESTABLISHED
There is hereby estab1ished a Water and Sewer
Board consisting of the M.ayor of the City, tw"o
Coun ~i1men se 1ec ted by the City Coun.c-1.1, and six
members appointed by the Counci1 from qua1ified
taxpaying e1ectors, serving s~x over-1app~ng terms
of six years. A representative from the City
admin~strat~on sha11 be appo~nted by the C~ty
Manager to serve as an ex-officio, non-voting
me~ber. One member of the Board sha11 be appo~nted
by the Cou.:n.ci1 to serve unti1 February 1, 1960;
two members of the Board sha11 be appointed by
the Counc~1 to serve unt~1 February 1, 1964.
Thereafter, members of the said Board sha11 be
appointed by the Counci1 for te~s of six years.
Counci1 members of said Board sha11 serve durLng
their tenure as such Counc iLmen. A11 members of
the Water and Sewer Board sba11 be subject to
remova1 by the Cou.nci1. "nte Counci1 sha.11 make
appointments to fi11 vacancies for the unexpired
terms. (Charter, §61; 1962 Code, §8.1)
-2-
•
• •
r 32x
•
•
•
•
Sectio-:-t 3.
enti..t:1ed ·•oel.i.nque':l.t:
as fo11ows:
~at Sect~on 15 -3 -17 of the C~ty Code
Water Bi.11s" is hereby amended to read
15-3-17: DELINQUENT WATER BILLS
Water bi11s on metered rates and schedul.ed f1at:
rates b ecome de1inquent: thirty days after the date
of the bi11ing~ Schedu1ed fl.at rates become del.in-
quent thirt y days after the beginning of the quarter
for ~hich they are rendered . Water is subject to
turn-off without notice whenever a bi11 therefor
has become de1inquent:; provided that the Water
D~vision sha11 give a five day written notice
before actua11y turning off water for non-payment.
Such notice sha11 be ~fected by regul.ar mail. to
the owner or occupant of the premises for which the
charge is due. The obl.ig ation to pay prompt1y for
water service is not: in any way affected by fai1ure
of the owner or occupant of the premises served
to rece~ve a bi11 for the service. (1962 Code. ~8.6-6)
Section 4.
ent:1.t1ed ••Refund of
as fo11ows:
That Sect~on 15-3-18 of the C~ty Code
Charges" is hereby am.ended to read
15-3-18: REFUND OF CHARGES
Refu:nds of scheduled charges 'Wi..1:L. be Ul8.de for
any portion of a property which sha11 have been
vacant. provided such vacancy sha11 have been
reported to the Water Division in ~ting and the
vacancy inspection sha11 have been made. Refunds
aha11 date from receipt of notice. Refunds sha11
a.1so be a11o"Wed in cases where servi.ces are turned
off by the Water Division and proper charge for such
turn-off sha11 have been paid. No credit or refund
•ha11 be given for excessive consumption or use of
water due to broken service 1ines or 1eaking fixtures
beyond the meter when a. tDeter i.s required ...
(a) In the event of excessive consumption
caused by underground service 1ines
broken beyond the meter. up to 5~ credit
for 1oss of water over norma1 consumption
Ls recorded for simi1ar prior periods ~11
be given :1.£ a p1umber is under a contract
to m.a.ke repairs within 72 hours after
d~scovery of such break. (1962 Code. §8.6-7)
-3-
•
• •
T 32xl
•
•
•
•
Se c tion 5 . Tha t Sec t ion 15 -3 -22 o f t he Ci t y Code
entit l e d ''Char :;;:::e s fo r Tu rn.:i.n g Off a n d On Wat e r'' is he r eby
amended t o r e ad as f o llows :
15-3-22: C HARGE S F OR TU R.~I N G OFF A..~D 0 :-< WATER
In case a license sha11 be revoked for cause,
and for t h at reason t h e water sha11 have been turne d
of£, a charg e of $5.00 sha11 be made. If water
t~rned off at the curb box by the Water Division
is un1awfu11y turned on, or caused to be turned on,
by the user, or if the waterway controlling the
service is not readily accessible, the service may
be cut off at the main by the Water Division, and
before the ~ater ~11 be turned on again the user
desiring same on said premises sha11 pay the cost
and expense of turning off and on including digging
in the street and permit fo r cutting pavement.
When a request is made by the 1icensee to have the
water turned off, a charge of $5.00 sha11 be made
for each such turn-off. (1962 Code, §8.6-11)
Sect~on 6. That Sect~on 15-3-32 of the C~ty Code
enti.t1ed ''Tappi...ng of Mains" is hereby am.ended to read as
fo11o-s:
LS-3-32: TAPPING AND CUTTING OFF MAINS
(a) The tapping of any ma:i.n for the purpose of
making a connection sha11 be done on1y by the Water
Division and at t he expense of the app1ican.t. The
corporation va1ve inserted in the main and the
service pipe to be 1a~d ~ust be of the size specified
:i.n the permit. (1963 Code, §4-2)
(b) The cutt~ng off fro= =aLns =ay be performed by
either a 1icensed and bonded p1umber or by Water
Di~sion personne1. In the event Wat~r Div1sion
personne1 perform the cut off and the tap is to be
abandoned a charge of $25.00 wi11 be due from the
app1~cant.
Sect~on 7. That Sect~on 15-3-33 of the C~ty Code
entit1ed ''Specifications for Service Pipe'' is hereby aDllended
to read as fo11ows:
LS-3-33: SPECIFICATIONS FOR SERVICE PIPE
Each service p~pe must be of the fo11owing spec~f~
c:at:l.ons:
(a) Copper pipe. A11 service pipe fro~ the main
to the property 1ine sha11 be not 1ess than
Type ''K'' soft copper tubing confoX"''Iling to
standard specifications •
-4-
•
• •
"!' r 32x
-
•
•
•
•
(b) C as t iron p1pe. C as e i r on pipe sha11 be
C1as s 15 0 c en trifuga11y cas t.
(c) Ga1vanized pipe. Galvanize d p ipe i nsta11ations
are permissible from t he p ro pe rty 1ine into
and through p r e mis e s .
(d) The use of b1ack pipe in insta11at i ons is
prohibited.
(e) Service pipes sha11 extend into the premises or
riser as specified~ and in no case sha11 be
stna11er than 3/4'' diameter. A11 si11c.ocks,
faucets or h y drants used for irrig ation pur-
poses sha11 be fed through a 3/4" pipe or
1arger. (1962 Code, §8.4-4)
(f) Other materials may be used on1y upon the
expressed approval. of the City Eng~eer or
Director of Utilities.
Section 8. That Section 15-3--34 'of the City Code
enti..t1ed "Materi.a1s to be Purchased From Ci..ty" is hereby
amended to read as £o11ows:
15-3-34: MATERIALS TO BE PURCHASED FROM CITY
In the case of permar1ent connections to the
m~ns of the City water system, the app1icant sha11
purchase from the Water Di~sion the fo11ow1ng
:m.ateri.a1s:
(a) The corporation stop by which connection is
made to the main.
(b) Water meter when required.
Section 9. That Section 15-3-52 of the City Code
ent:l.t1ed "Work t:o be Done by Bonded P1uxnber11 is hereby
amended to read as fo11ows:
15 -3-52: WORK TO BE DONE BY STATE LICENSED AND
BONDED PLUMBER
A11 work in connection with water pipes or
f~tures connected to or to be connected to the
~ater system sha11 be done by a state 1icensed
p1umber under bond to the City. (1962 Code, §8.4-3)
Section 10. That a11 Ordinances and parts of
Ordinances in conf1ict here~th are hereby express1y
repea1ed.
-5-
•
II • •
•
•
•
•
In t roduced~ read i n full and p assed o n £ina1 reading
o n t he 20 th day of ~1arch,. 1972.
Pub1ish ed as a Bi11 for an Ord~n ance o n t he 2 3rd day
of March . 1 972.
Read b y tit 1 e and passed on £ina1 read~ng on the
d a y of 1 9 72.
Pub1 ~shed b y tit1e as Ordinanc e N o.
Seri e s o f 1972 o n the d a y o f 1 9 72.
Attest :
ex officio City C1e rk
I • -;---,~---,------.,,...--.,--:---:----• do hereby certify that
the above and fore g oing i s a true~ accurate and comp1ete
copy of an Ordinance. passed on £ina1 reading and pub1 ished
by t:f..t1e as Ordinance N o. -----" Seri..es of 1972.
ex off~c ~o C ~t y C 1 erk
-6-
• \ .,.
• •
T 32xl
•
•
•
•
IXTRODUCED AS A BILL BY CO UN Ciu~~
A BILL FOR
AN ORDI::<IA.-.;CE REPEALI);G SECTION 3, CHAPTER 2, TITLE V, OF THE
'69 E.M.C., ENTITLED "PAY PLAN" BY RELIEVING THE BOARD OF
CAREER SERVICE CON~!ISSIO~"ERS FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF AN
ANNUAL RECOMMENDATIO::<I OF A PAY PLAN.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as fo11o-s:
Section 1~ That Section 5-2-3 of the Officia1 City
Code is hereby repea1ed.
5-2-3: PAY PLAN
Repea1ed
Section 2. That a11 Ordinances or parts of Ordinances
in conf1ict here~th are express1y repea1ed.
on the
day of
Attest:
Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading
day of 1972.
Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the
1972.
MAYOR
ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk
I. • do hereby certify
that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and comp1ete
copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced, read in fu11
and passed on first reading on the day of
1972 .
ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk
• ', I
~
• •
T 32X
-
-
-
-
j:'L
L: E
I~TRODUCED AS A BILL BY COU~CI~~~ !
eouNc'L,.
A BILL FOR
~ DE EN G ~~V...:o "G FILE oo. C:QLCJ_
&~ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTION 7. CHAPTER 7,
TITLE XI. '6 9 E.l'-LC . • ENTITLED OFFENSES RELATING TO MORALS
BY DEFINING &~ PROHIBITING THE PROMOTIO~ OF OBSC ENITY.
P ROMO TING THE S AME TO MI N O RS AN D PRO HIBITING THE P UBLI C
D I SPLAY O F O B SCENE MATE RIAL . WI TH I N THE C ITY OF ENGLEWOOD,
COL ORADO .
WHEREAS, the m embers of the City Cou nci1 have
heretofore r e ceived numerous petitions and 1etters of prote s t
re1at:ive t:o the exhibition of obscene and pornographic fi1..m.s
in the City of E n g 1e~ood; and
WHEREAS, the Cit y Counci1 has heretofore received
reports from the City Attorney and from the Co1orado Municipa1
League, a....s we11 as t:he Nat:iona1 Institute of Mu.ni..cipa1 Offices,
and others re1at:ive to the possi..bi1i..t:y of effective municipa1
1egis1at:i..ve cont:ro1 of exhibition of obscenity ; and
WHEREAS, the City Counci1 recognizes the dangers
of censorship and the Lmport:ance of freedom of speech as
guaranteed by the Constitutions of the U nited States and the
State of Co1orado. and acknow1edg es that freedo~ of speech
Ls abso1ute1y necessary in a progressive and free society; and
WHEREAS. the City Counci1 desires to preserve to
the mov~e industry and to a11 others the freedom fro~ censor-
ship and freedom of speech. and at the same time perform its
duty in the protection of the citizens of the community from
prurient and shamefu1 interests in nudity. sex and sexua1
conduct.
NOW, THEREFORE • BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as fol.1o""i:
Section 1. That Section 11-7-7 of the •69 E.M .C .
is hereby repea1ed and reenacted as fo11o~s:
11-7-7: DEFINITION
A. As used in this section. un1ess the context
otherwise requires:
( 1) •'obscene'' IDea.ns any materia1 or performance
which if considered as a who1e the predomdnant
appea1 is to prurient. shamefu1 or morbid interests
in nudity. sex. sexua1 conduct, sexua1 excite~ent.
excretion. sadism. masochism or sadomasochistic
abuse. and such materia1 or performance goes sub-
stantia11y beyond customary 1imits of candor in
describing any of such matters. and is utter1y
~thout redeeming socia1 va1ue.
-1-
•
0 -
r 32
•
•
-
•
(2) "Predominant a.poea1" sha11 be judged with
reference to the average adu1t:, un1ess it appears
from the character of the material or performance,
or the character of its dissemination or presentations
to be designed for minors or any other espec~a~~Y
sus c eptib~e audienc e.
(3) ''Mat eria 1'' means anything ~i.ch i s cap a b1e
o f b eing used o r adapted to aro use in t e r e st, whe t her
t h rough the medium of reading , o bserva tio n , s o u n d
o r any other m anne r.
(4) ''Perfo rmanc e'' means any p 1ay , m ot i on p i cture ,
dance o r o the r exhibitio n.
(5 ) .. Pro m ote" tne a.ns t:o p rod uce ,. direct ,. perform i n,.
manuf a cture , i s s u e ,. se11 ,. g ive , provide , 1 e n d,
mai 1 ,. d e1 i.ve r,. transfe r ,. pub1ish, distribute,.
c i rcu1at:e , dis seminate, p r es e nt, exhibit,. or
advert i s e f or pecuniary g ain, or to offer or a g ree
to do any o f t he se thing s f or pecuniary g ain.
(6) ''Nudity'' means the showing of the hutna.n ma1e
or fema1 e g enita1s, pubic area, or buttocks with
1ess than a fu11 opaque covering thereof, or the
showing of the fema1e breast ~th 1ess than a
fu11y opaque covering of any portion thereof be1ow
the top of the nipp1e, or the depiction of covered
ma1e geni.ta1s in a di.scernib1y turgid state.
(7) ··~·· means any person wh.o has not reached
h~s eighte enth birthday .
(8) "Sexua1 conduct" tneans acts of m.a.sturbati.on,
homosexuality, sexual intercourse, or physica1
contact ~th a person's c1othed or unc1othed geni.ta1s,
pubic area, buttocks or i.£ such person be a fem.a1e,
breast.
(9) ''Sexu.a1 exci.te~nt'' means the condition of the
human ma1e or fema1e genita1s , when in the state
of sexua1 sti.~u1ation or arousa1.
(1Q)••sadom.asochistic abuse'' tne:ans f1a.g g e1at::i.on or
torture by or u p o n a p e r s on c ~othe d i n unde rg arme n t s ~
a mas k ,. o r b i zzare costume,. o r the cond i t i on o f b ein g
f e ttere d,. bou nd or oth e rw~s e p hy sica.11y r e str ained
on the part of a person so c1othed .
( 11) ''Know-i.ng1y'' means having genera1 kn.ow1edge of,.
or reason to know, or a be1ief or ground for be1i.ef ~hi.ch warrants further inspection or inquiry of the
character and content of any ~ateria1 or performance
which is reasonab1y suscepti.b1e of ex&ni.na.tion by a
person .
-2-
• •
2X
-
•
•
•
•
( 12) ''Person'' means any i.ndi.vidua.1 corporation,.
association, partnership, trustee, 1easee, agent,
or assignee.
(13) '"Ha.rtnfu.1 to Minors'' means obscenity which:
(a) Predominate1y appeals to the prurient
Lnterest of ~nors; and
(b) Goes substantia11y beyond customary 1imits
of candor recognized in the adu1t community
~th respect to what is suitab1e for minors;
and
(c) Is utter1y ~thout redee~ing socia1 va1ue
for m.i_nors.
B. PROMOTING OBSCENE MATERIAL -PROHIBITED
It is un1aw£u1 for any person knowingly to:
(1) Promote or possess ~th intent to pro~ote,
any obscene materia1; or
(2) Produce, present or direct any obscene
pe rforma.:nce; or
(3) Partic ipate in a portion of any such
performance ~hich is obscene or contributes
to its obscenity.
C. PROMOTING OBSCENE MATERIAL TO A MINOR -PROHIBITED
It sha11 be un1aw£u1 for any person ~f he
sha11 kno~1y:
(1) Promote to a minor any mater~a1 which
taken as a. who1e is ha.rDI..fu1 to m..i.nors;
o :r
(2) Prc::nootes to a. mi._nor a perfortna.nce wh~ch
taken as a who1e ~s barm£u1 to m..i.nors or
admits a minor to pre~~ses where such a
performance is exh~bited or takes p1ace;
or
(3) Permits a. minor to participate ~n the
perform.ance wh~ch taken as a. who1e is
harm£u1 to m~nors •
-3-
•
• •
T 32X
-
•
•
•
o n t he
day o f
Attest :
•
D. OBSCE:>.C: ~1ATERIAL -Pt:BLIC DISPLAY -PROHIBITED
It sha11 be un1a~fu1 to disp1ay or cause to be
disp1ayed ~thin the City so that the same can be
seen from any pub1ic ma11s, wa1ks, streets or a11ey-
~ays or from any other pub1ic p1ac es or from ~thin
a pub1ic par~ any materia1, pictoria1 representation,
photograph, L11ustration, or advertisement depicting
obscenity, nudity, or sexua1 c onduct , or any des-
cription or advertisement of or offer to se11 such
pictoria1 materia1 where such des c rip t ion or
advertisement inc1udes such mat eria1s or detai1ed
verba1 description thereof.
Introduc ed, read in fu11 and passed o n first reading
day o f 1 97 2.
Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance o n the
197 2.
Mayor
ex o ff ic i o Ci t y C 1 erk
I, , do hereby certify
that the above and fore g oing ~s a true. accurate and comp1ete
copy of a B i 1 1 fo r a..n Ord~nance. introduced. read ~n £-u11
and passed on first reading on the day of
1972.
e x o ffici o C ity C1erk
-4-
•
• •
I' 32X
•
•
•
•
The research of author~ties for the devel o p me nt of
the proposed ne"W Section 1 1 -7 -7 et:: seq. of the City Code was
gathered from numerous sources~ but primarily from decided
Federal cases since 195 9. and a1so the State Le g is1ative
E nac oment dealing ~th pornography. being Section 40 -2 8 -1
et seq., C .R.S. '63, as amended. The 1969 Act was used
1ibera11y in the preparation of the proposed amendment:.
As you may kno"W, the 196 9 Ac t dealing wi t h pornography was
ru1ed ~nconst::it::utiona1 by Judge Naugle in December of 1 970.
Reference to that ~at::eria1, and specifically t hose items
that t he Judge fe1t were un c o~sti t::ut ion a1, have been removed.
Reference has also been made and mater~a 1 has been taken from
the Sections on Crimes and Punishment under t he ne~ State
Cr~mina 1 Code . proposed Sect ion 40 -7-101 re1ating to pornography.
wh~ch act ~i1 1 be in effect on Ju1y 1. 1972.
References were made to the draft study of the new
Federa1 Crimina1 Code. Tit1e 18 of the United States Code,
presented in a fina1 report to the President and Congress in
Nove~ber 1970. It i s interesting to note that much of the
~ateria1 for the Federa1 Act has been incorporated in the
new State CrLmina1 Code on pornography.
The Sections above retain as much of the existing
obscenLt y 1aw as the United States Supreme Court has indicated
is coostitutiona11y va1id. The tripartite test was first
out1 Lned in Roth vs. The Un ited States. 354 U.S. 476 (1 957)
case. and e1aborated on in Memoi rs vs. Massachusetts. 383
U.S. 413 (1966) case. The tripartite test ~as simp1y the
fo11ow:lng :
Materia1 is obscene if taken as a who1e it:
(a) Has as its dominant theme an appea1 to prurient
interest in sex of the average pers -n . or in the
case of materia1 designed for or disseminated to
a specia1 group, to the prurient interest in
sex of the members of the group; and
(b) Exceeds the candor permissib1e in description
or representation of sexua1 matters judged by
standards genera11y accepted in the Uni ted States
as 1Lmiting such description or representation;
and
(c) Utter1y without socia1 va1ue to persons to whom
the dissemination is addressed.
The definition of "Predominant Appea1 .. 11-7-7 A (2)
incorporates the pandering ru1e of Ginsburg vs. The United
States. 383 U.S. 463 (1963) case. Note thatthLs Section
prohibit s distr~bution or promot1on. but it does not prohibit
possession of pornographic materia1s, which was dec1ared
unconstLtutiona1 in S t an1e y vs. Georgia. 394 U .S. 357 (1969)
case.
•
• •
T 32X
-
-
-
-
-
In a ver"· recent: case a£ Ka.ra1exis v s. B'-·rne ,.
3 06 Fed . S u p.,. 363 ~t ass .,. t.;.S . Dist:. Ct. (1969) a t:h ree
judge Fe d era1 D i s trict Court construed t he S t anle y c ase to
h o 1 d uncon stituti ona1 prohibi t ions on t he d i s tribu tion o f
o b sce n ~t y t o c onsenting adults, where t h ere h a ve been sho wn
to b e adeou at e c on t ro1s to p r eve n t e xpos ure to c h i l dren or
offenses to t he se ns i b i l ities of the genera1 pub1ic.
A£ter reading num.erous ca.ses and materials on this
subject: matter,. it seems to me the trend of the American La~
~t:h reference to obscenity,. takes on two significant areas
of effective 1e g is1ation . The first is that the State or its
po1it:ica1 a g ency may prohibit the promotion of obscenity ,.
on1y insofar as it may fa11 into the hands of children. or
second1y it may proh~bit the same insofar as it may intrude
upon the sensitivities or the privacy of the genera1 pub1ic.
Indeed it appears 1ike1y that an adu1t individuaL ~ay view
whatever materia1 he persona11y seLects for vie~ng or reading
without offending any State CrLmina1 La~. Federa1 ReguLatory
Act. dea1ing ~th obscenity. or City OrdLnance dea1ing ~th
the same subject matter .
•
--
r 32 x
•
•
•
R E SOLL'"TIO); :o-.:0 . SERIE S OF 1972
A RE SOLt:TlO~ A t:THO RIZ I~:G THE EXECt.:Tt.O:-= OF A CO~TRACT FOR THE P L'"RCHAS E
OF LA~'"D F O R THE l:Tl LI Tl ES DEPARTI!E~T .
\o.THEREAS ., it has b een deterr.1ined that the Utilities Department
of the City of Engle~oo d ., Colorado is in need of additional real
property upon ~hic h it ~ay ., from tim e to time ., expand its fa c ilitie s ;
and
\o.~EREA S , a certain parcel of ground a s hereinafter d esc ribed is
proper and s uitable for s uch future plant;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C ITY
OF ENGLE\...000 :
l. That the Mayor of t.h@ Ci ty of Englewood is hereby authorized
to execute an agreem ent for the purcha se and sale of 1 .2011 acres
of real property for the purchase price of Sixteen Thousand Five
Hundred Dolla rs ($16 ,500 .00). Said real property is described as
follows:
A Tract of land located in W~, NE~ NE~ of Section 33 ,
To~ship 4 South , Range 68 We s t of the 6eh P .M., described
as follo~s : BEGINNING at a point which is 990.0 feet South
and 417.0 feet East of the NW corner of said NE~ NE~; thence
Nore.h 373.7 feet; thence East 140.0 feet ; thence Soue.h and
parallel with the West line of said Section 33, a distance of
373.7 feet; thence West and parallel with the North line of
said Section , a distance of 140 .0 feet to the point of
beginning.
2 . That the Director of Finance is hereby authorized to draw
from the general utility funds a warrant in the amount of One Thousand
Dollar s ($1 ,000 .00) made paya ble to Terry Lindner, seller , to be
transmi tted w~th the executed agreement and to serve as a deposit on
the purcha se price of said property, pursuant to its terms.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED thi.s ----day of
1972.
Atte st :
ex officio City Clerk
-----------• A.D. •
Mayor
X , ex officio City Clerk of the
City of Englewood, State of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above
and foregoing is a true . accurate and complete copy of Resolution
No . , Series of 1972 •
ex officio CLty Clerk
• •
-
-
•
SERIES OF 19 -2
A RESOLUTtO:-.= A IJ THORIZI~:c "T HE EXECL'TIO....: OF A CONTRACT FOR THE PURCHASE
OF LA:-:D FOR TH E CTILITIE5 DEPART!-:E~.:T .
\..THEREAS , it has been deteml.ned that the Uti li1:.i es D epa r t.m nt
of the City of Engle~ood , Colorad o is in need of additional real
property up on ,.,;hich it may ., from time to time ., expand it:.s faci l ities ;
and
WHEREAS ., a certain parcel of ground as hereinaf t er described is
proper and suitable for such f u t u re plant ;
SO~., THEREFORE ., BE IT R ESOLV ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF E:O.:GLE\..'"000 :
1 . That the Ma yor of the City of E n g l e w ood is hereby a u t h orized
t o e x ecute a n agreeme n t fo r t he p u rchase and sale of 0 .935 1 acres
of r ea l pro p er ty for t h e purc h ase price of ~i n e Thou sand E ight H u ndred
F ifty Seven Do llar s ($9 .,8 5 7 .00). Said r ea l pro p e rty i s d e scri b e d
f o llows :
C ommencing at a point 9 9 0 f eet S outh a nd 308 f e et Ea st
of the ~V corn e r of the NE~ NE~ o f S ect i on 33 , T own s h i p
4 South, Ran ge 68 Wes t of the 6th Principal Meridian,
thence North 3 73 .7 feet, the nc e Ea s t 1 0 9.0 feet, thence
South and parallel to the W~s t line of s aid Section 33,
373.7 feet, thence West and parallel to the North line o f
said Section 3 3, 1 0 9 feet to the point of beginning;
2 . That the Director of Finance i s her~by authorized t o draw
from the gen e ral utility fund s a ~arrant in the amount of One Thousand
Dollars ($1 ,000 .00) ma de payable to S hirley L. Wil s on, seller, to be
tran smitted w i th the exec uted a g r e e me nt and to s erve as a depos it on
the purcha se pric e of said property, pur s uant to its term.s.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED thi s ----day of
1972.
Attest:
ex officio C ity C lerk
-----------• A. D . 0
I ,. ex officio City Clerk of the
Ciey of Englewo od,. S tate of Colorado, do hereby certify that the above
and foregoing is a true,. accurate and complete copy of Resolution
No. ----' S~ri es of 19 7 2.
ex officio City Cl~rk
• •
r 32x
-
•
•
• -
TO: All !rl.er:abers <",{the EJ:::..gl e,,ood City CcuncU
FR0::\1.: ~!.r .. Stanley H. D ial. City ~I.a..nager
D-4\.TE: 1\'la.rcb 31. 1.97 2
Sl::""D-J ECTo LETTER FROl\t ~lR... DEVJEY F .. ~rt.LLE.R
7hc a .";.t."l'c-hod is :1. letter 'from !\I~. De~\cey F. ?.l!_ller, 47 30 South L<:>g3;D
St.rt:::e~ ""hich fr.£e :~1ayor felt should be pas:sed. on to o.J.: ::oemhcrs o! the
C-::.>o.!.O.Cil ..
Respectfully .
STAKLEY H .. DIAL
City !.\.l:l.n..a.£er
SHD/tj
Att.
•
'
• •
T 32X
•
•
•
•
0 -
::: rc:-: 2 5 ~ 1 972
To : :::r-y or S r:~i...
C1~y C o~~c1l ~e ~~e~s .
s~~1 E w~~~. c ~J..o .
F r o :::!: ::e-.... ·e y :. !·:!.J..J...e r
47 3 0 So . L ~-an S ~. E n ~~e~oo ~. C oJ..o ...
Re: Po11 u t~o n , a n ~~a1 con~ro1, yr~or1 t~es, & O ?t~ons ...
D ear S:1.r s :
I a t te nd.e.3. 't he C o ·~c 1.1 1"!l e e t1.n g or l-!e...rcb. 2 0, ex'9e c t 1.!1.g-to
h ear ~r so=e s c t i.?n to ~~r d eo J..v ~n g t ~~ e ~e r ex p e nd 1.ng ~nd cr1.t~ce1
d og p r -:>b l..e~. =ne~e a..:i. t;!:.e =e e 't~n~ ":as :::io:n l.n s ted. b y a sen1.o:-c1.t1.z.en
&ct1.ng a& God , J ud ~e. an ~ jury , e xpound :1.ng h :1.s p ur:1.t an 1 cal.. vl.e~s
r ega r.:i.1.n~ t Ce sh o~~~e or cer~a:1.n mov1 e s l.n e n E ngl..ewood T h eatre.
No.1.se .1.s a ror::n or pol..l..ut.1.on ... _;o.1.se .. :Cro!!l be.r k !.n ~ d.og-s, :1.s a m e nace
~o the pe ac e ~~~ q ~1.et ~r c1.~1.ze n s wt ~ are :Coree~ to w1.~hotan~ th:1.s
e ver 1 ~cr e a s 1.n~ ~~noyanc e . We have no O?t:1.ono. We mu s ~ l..l.s ten~ day
and n~=h ~ t~ ~~e bar 41n ~ a nd ho~2~n ~ or one o~ m ore of the e~teen
dog s 10ca~e ~ w~~h 1n a r&~~us or 150-fe e t from ou~ l1v1 n: quarters.
(Th e a~te~ian ce at ~he X-~a ~ed ~o v1e ~s oot1or~1.) ~e ~ve no a1terna-
t~ve. Ev ery ca~ t ~~~ ~o v e s ~e arb y . s c h ooi ch11d ren ~a1 k 1n ~ the
stre e t a n ~ e ~1ey . car s ~ ~r~c~s ~n t h e a11ey. a11 are potent1a1 causes
that Q u1te o r~e n t r ~gg er s a c~~n react1o~ or ber~~n € dogs.
I a o c o:1.v 1.~c ed. -:.1""-.e.t ~he p lac e ~o s t E-rt 1.n eo-::>:1.:'\g wi..th "t h i..s p rob1ec
1 S "tb.e 1 1.c e>~s!...::~ o'£' e..1l ::i.0 €8. ·.,;1~h ?Ut S O :!le f'~rm of re g .i.str&.t1.o n hOW
ca ~ reo~o ns1b111~Y b e es ta b1~s~ed .
S o~e c ons 1 de ra t1o~ s~o u l d ~~v en L o the e a n1t a t1on nrob 1 e ~ that 1.s 1 n c~d en ta 1 t o the d ~g s 1n t h e c:1.ty. So ~e o w ners t h row the dog drop p 1.~g e
1n t he a 11ey . 1.n the t r a s h c a ~. or j~st t~~~~ 1t over ~he renee •
(Denver p roh1b 1 t s t h e use or t h e trash can s ror t h~a purpose)
Yours truly.
•
• •
'32X
-
•
•
0 -
PROSPECTUS
AND
NO'TICE
OF SAIAE
$511.,000
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD., COLORADO
PAVING DISTRICT NO. 21 I SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BO OS
DATED JUNE 1, 1972
BID O P EN I NG '
APRIL 27., 1972 10:00 A.M.
3400 SOUTH ELATI STREET I ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
•
•
• •
~"32x
r.--,
" w
tv
X -
ID
w-----------------•. -,.--
• • I
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COWRAOO
HISTORY OF IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BOND RETIREMENT
Bonds Retired
Paving District No. 6 $250,000 bonds , issued 9-1-56, retired 8·1 ·62
Paving District No. 7 215 ,000 bonds, issued 8·1-57 , retired 11+63
Paving District No. 8 210 ,000 bonds, issued 9·1·5 8, retired 9·1-64 P~ving District No. 9 215,000 bonds, issued 7-1-59, retired 6·1-65
Paving District No . 10 230,000 bonds , issued 9-1 ·6 0, retired 5-1-66
Paving District No, 11 250,000 bonds, issued 7-1 ·61, retired 6-1-69
Paving District No. 12 425,000 bonds, issued 7-1·62, retired 7-1·68
Paving Distri ct No. 13 330,000 bonds, issued 6-1-63 , retired 6-1·69
Paving Di strict No. 14 250 ,000 bonds , issued 6·1-64, retired 12 -1-71
Scenic View Sanitation Sewer District 275,000 bonds, issued 4-1·63, retired 12 ·1-71
Bonds Outstanding
(As of 1·1·721
Paving Paving Paving Paving Paving Paving District District Di strict District District District Description ~ ~ ..!!2:.12.. No. lB ~ ~ Total
Original Issue,
I . .
Amount $255,000 $172 ,000 $387,000 $245 ,000 $372,000 $427 ,000 * $1,858,000 Date 7-1·65 6·1-66 6-1-68 6·1-69 6+70 6·1-7 1
Date of Last Call 1-1-72 12 ·1-71 12 ·1-71 12 ·1-71 12+71
1
Retired as of 1-1-72 226,000 149 ,000 267,000 146 ,000 222,000 1,010 ,000
Outstanding 1-1 · 72 29,000 23,000 120,000 99 ,000 150,000 427,000 848 ,000
20\ Guarantee Per
Charter Section 108 51 ,000 35 ,000 78 ,000 49,000 75 ,000 86,000 374,000
Bonds Outst anding in
Excess of Guarantee None None 42,000 50 ,000 75,000 341,000 508,000
Period Ove r Which
Assessments Remain
to be Paid 4 years 5 yea rs 7 year s 8 years 9 years 10 years
•
•
" w
N
X
Surplus and Deficiency
Fund Balance as of
January 1, 1972 '*
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, OOI.ORADO
HISTORY OF IMPROVEIIENT DISTRICT BOND RETIREMENT
(Continued)
$371,352
•Bonds for Paving District No. 20 may not be called until June 1, 1972. Assessments of Paving District No . 20 may
be paid in full with a discount in the Spring of 19(2. The first installment on unpaid assessments is due
January 1, 1973.
''To create this fund the City of Englewood, between the period of 1956-1965, transferred $136,700 to the Paving
Distr let accounts, This was in accordance with Charter Section 109,
•
•
I I
I . .
1
•
-
•
•
.. -
General. Fi..na..nci...al. Data
In 1.970 the Engl..ewood Ci...ty Council. l..owered the 1..971. mi11.. l..evy
from 4.985 mi...l..l..s to 3.97 mi...l..l..s _ The retail. sal.es and use tax -as
i...ncreas~ i.n September , 1.970, from 2 cents to 3 cents . These actions
~ere designed to beq~ the imp1ementation of a capital. improvements
prc:>gram of over $1 ,.4 00 ,000 per year for he next six years and are i...n
concert with the present phi1osophy of fLnancing general. capita1 improve-
ments on a ·•pay as you go·· basis. Ma::JOr water and se-er capi..ta.1 improve-
ments have been financed by bonds which are repaid fr o m operating revenues
a.n.d a.re,. therefore . not i...nc1uded under the ••pay as you go•• po1i.cy _ T h e
Ci.ty is a1s o perf o ~ing S1 ,300.000 worth of capi..ta1 improvements to the
Sewage Treatment P1a...nt t.hi.s year without bonds.
January
February
March
April.
May
June
Jul.y
Aug u s t
Septe..mbe.r
October
Nove mber
December
1961.
1962
1963
1.964
1 9 65
1 966
1.9 67
1.9GB
1 969
1.970
1.97 1.
City of Engl.ewood
Sal.es Tax Revenue
(In Dol.l..ars C ol.l.ected)
s 52 ~04 6
27,.21.2
25 .770
47,444
4 3 ,307
43,1.53
63 ,620
48,243
53 ,965
67,640(2,)
48,.61.9(21k)
1.06 , 545 (2,)
$ 208 ,085
88 ,592
85 ,476
1.1.8 ,824
1.04,767
11.5.005
1.40,624
1.1.4 ,1.08
1.32,998
1.48 ,365
1.21.,066
1.46 ,509
$
1.970 (2')
260 ,.049 $
11.8.940
11.1,147
137,.878
130 ,.403
144 ,957
1...69,043
140,526
161,.244
250 ,.638 (3,)
222,.333(3.)
251.721(3 ... )
426,.325
1 98,.843
1.9 3,.962
254 ,.208
229 ,446
242.598
2 95 ,049
248,696
266,.936
306,025
252,279
278,.417
$627,564 $1.. ,524 ,4 1..9 $2,098.879 $3,.192,784
History of Assessed Va1uati..o n •
Eng1ewood
$46 ,.11.5,.735
48,292 ,.386
50 ,19 4,9 21.
4 9 ,773,.013
4 9 ,.348,076
51,.420,375
53,.407,873
61,.1.01 ,.694
65,234 ,81.8
70,.51.5 ,789
75,.360 ,.063
Arapahoe County
$206 ,844,.850
229,700,1.80
249,334,060
252 ,685,550
268,1..5 9 ,295
271..,228,.1.04
281.,1.80,022
299,91.6,850
31.5,321..,640
336 ,040,980
384,258,064
Arapahoe County
School. District *1
$43,.746,171
45,449,634
44,.428,466
44,292,881
44 ,243,.960
4-4 ,.8 .40,194
45,620,.816
53,.201.,029
56,986,1.81
61.,.686,.465
66,248,142
•Per capita assessed val.uation haS increased from $1,388 i.n 1.961 to
$2,237 i.n 1.971. f or the City.
-1.4 -
•
•
\
~
• •
'32xl
-
-
-
-
• -
Eng1ewood serves as a bus~ess and professiona1 center with
460 o ffices existing on January 1. 1972.
The industria1 growth of Eng1ewood has been considerab1e. On
January 1. 1 9 72 , over 200 industries existed within the City. Major
emp1oyers inc1ude:
Air Contro1 Products
AHX Co., :X.nc.
Bingo King Cc::locnpa.ny, Lnc.
Burt Chevr:o1et
Continenta1 Nationa.l. Bank
Denver Dry GoodS Company
Fa.b Too1s. Inc .
First Nati.ona1 Bank of
Eng1ewood
Genera1 Iron Works
Jos1i.n.s
K-Mart Discount Store
Lowdermi~k Construction Company
Mart~-Harietta Corporation
Mecha..n.i...x Corporation
Mi11er Sa1es Company
Na.tiona1 C-a%nera. Repair Schoo1
Na t..ki..n a..nd Com.pa.ny
Neustete.rs
Partitions, Xnc.
T. A . Pe1su.e Ccxnpa..ny
J . C. Penney Com.pa.ny
Precision Too1
Wi.1kerson Corporation
Ten Largest Taxpay ers
Ci.ndere.l.1a City Shopping Center
Mountain Be11
Genera1 1ron workS
Pub.l.i.c Service Company
First Nationa.l. Bank of E.ng.l.ewood
Jos.l.i..ns
ContLnenta.l. Natio.na.l. Bank
Burt c:.hevro.l.et
K-Mart Di..scount Store
Centennia.l. Shopping Center
Assessed Va1uation
$5,276,81.0
2 ,044.140
1,288~580
1~275,390
1 ,088 ,864
836 ,860
637 ,570
565 ,340
400,730
301.730
Eng1ewood is surrounded on a11 aides by other cities. The
residenti.a1 portion of the community is cha.ngi..ng from sing1e fazni1y
homes to mu1ti-fa.mi1y apartment d-e11i..ngs _ x.n the .l.ast two ca.l.e.ndar
years 37 apartment houses have been constructed. with a tota.l. of 985
1ivi.ng units. or an average of just under 27 units per apartment house.
1961
1962
.1.963
.1.964
1965
1.966
1967
1968
1.969
1970
.1.971
Bui.l.dinq Per~ts
1.,611
1,816
1 ,986
1 ,4 35
1,426
.1.,74 6
1,744
1,797
2,250
2 ,537
2,436
-13 -
•
$ 3,760;705
5 ,64 5 ,696
3 ,744,933
.1.,904 .757
2,225;214
4 ~758,2 86
16,774,006
12,849,779
1.2~683 ,812
10~624,990
13,11.8,442
-
--
I' 32 X I
-
-
•
Year
1961
1962
1.963
1964
1.965
1.966
1.967
1.968
1.969
1..970
•
• -
...
City of Eng l.ewood Ad Va1orem Tax Col.l.ections
~·
$595,.457
508 ,027
572 .,347
61.5 .,520
755.,098
786.,783
806 ,61.1.
304.,596
325 .,003
280 .,561.
Col.l.ected
$590.,81.2
505 ,283
567.,253
61.2 ,258
754,873
786 ,521.
803 .,948
304 ,764
324 ,.188
279,531.
Percentage
99.22'
99.46
99.1.1
99 .47
99.97
99 .96
99 .66
100.05
99.74
99 .63
•
•Ad Va..l.ore.m taxes reduced a£ter 2'-sal. a& tax w as i.ntrodu.ced .i..n Nov ember ,
1.968, and 3' 1n September , 1970 .
A11 Ad Va.l.orem Tax Levies A£fec:t.i..n.:51 Cit~ Pro~rty o-ners
1.965 ~ ~ 1.968 1.969 1.970 1971.
State 0 .000 0 .000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
County 1.0 .0 4 1 9 .1.50 9 .480 9 .230 9.300 1.0.700 1.0 .500
School. Di.st. 111 52 .640 56 .558 61..1.82 53.920 65.234 66.944 68.41.0
Ci.ty 15 .301. 1.5 .301. 15 .103 4.985 4.985 3 .970 3.970
County Pu.bl.i.c
School. Fund ~ 1.3 .751 1.3.720 ~ 0 .000 0 .000 ~
Total. 91.675 94.760 99.485 82 .305 79 .519 81..61.4 82.880
-1.5 -
• •
-
•
•
• -
DEBT INFORMATION AS O F JANUA...RY 1 ,. 1.972
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD HAS A CLEAR RECORD OF PROMPT PAYMENT
OF ALL PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST ON OtrrSTAND:I:NG OBLIGATIONS
on Tuesday , March 9 , 1971 ,. th C~ty sol.d $2,200 ,000 General.
Obl.igation w ater Improvement BondS matur~g from 1972 through 1986 for
the Ranch Creek Water Diversion Project ncar Fraser, Col.orado. The
i...ssue was rated by Moody • s at A -l. and by Standard and Poors at AA. The
1ow bid of ContLncntal. Il.l.inoi...s National. Bank was 4 .35321 percent. T h e
principal. and interest for this issue wi...l.l. be paid from Water Fund
revenues.
Popul.ati...on
According to the 1970 Census the Ci...ty popul.ati...on was 33,695 .
Va1uati.o:n
Actual. Val.uati...on, estimated
Assessed Val.uation , 1.971
General. Obl...igati.on Debt
General. Obl.i.gat:i..on Water Bonds
Less: Sel.f -Supporting Portion
Net General. Obl.~gation Debt
Other Debt
Refu.nd.:i.ng se-er Revenue Bonds
Special. Lmprovement District Bonds
(Xncl.udes bonds $511~000 to be issued
for Paving District No. 21 on June 1,
1972 --see pa.qe 3 .)
-16 -
.:.. •
$240,465,804
$ 75,361.,983
$5,760,000
5 ,760 ~000
$·-----=0,;;.-
$ 595~000
$1~389~000
•
• •
T 32X
~-
-
•
• -
Overl.apping Debt -City•s Share
.1.971. Assessed
Va..1u..ati.on.
School. DLstr i.ct No. l. (Enql.ewood)
SC:.bool. Distri.ct No. 2 (She...ri..dan)
School.. Di.st..ric:t No. 5 (Cherry Creek)
$66,234,552
1..2,434.166
94,977,320
Total. Overl.appLnq Debt
Net Direct
Net Direct
Net Direct
Net Direct
Per Capi.ta
Per Capi.ta.
Per Capita
Debt Ratios
Debt to Actu&1 Val.ua.tion
and overLapping Debt to Actua1 Val.uati.on
Debt to Assessed Val.uati.on
and Over1apping Debt to Assessed Val.uati.on
Assessed Val.uati.on
Net D:i.rect Debt
Net Direct and Overl.app1ng Debt
-.1.7 -
C i. t:y • .s Sha..re
o£ Debt
$3,634,002
615,351"'
505,609
$4 ,754,962
$2,236.59
-0-
$1.41..1.2
•
• •
'32 x l
-
•
•
•
City of Engl.ewood
3400 South El.ati
Engl.ewood, Col..orado
Gentl.emen;
•
• -
FOR SUBM.ITTAL
APRIL 27, 1972
1.0:00 A.M.
BID FOR
$51.1.,000
CrrY OF ENG.LEWOOD, COLORADO
PAVING DIST'B.l:CT NO. 21
SPECl:AL ASSESSMENT BONDS
In fu1l. accordance with the Official. Notice of Sal.e dated April. 7, 1.972,
which by reference is made a part of th1s bid, for $51.1.,000 of l.egal.l.y
issued PavLng District No. 21. Special. Assessment Bonds of the City o£
Engl.ewood, C ol.orado, we wil.l. pay you $1,000 for each $1.,000 bond pl.us
accrued interest f ro~ date of issue to date of del.ivery to us for bonds
bearing i.nterest and rna.tur:i..ng as fol.l.a-s:
$21.0,000
77,000
56,000
46,000
46,000
40,000
36 ,000
EstLmated Maturity
12-l.-1.973
12-l..-1974
1.2 -1.-1975
12 -1.-1976
1.2-1.-1.977
1.2-1.-1.978
1.2-l.-1979
"A .. Coup::o.n Rate
:r.n addition, ""B" coupons -i11 be attached whi..ch sha11 be as £o11ows:.
$21.0,000
77,000
56,000
46,000
46 ,000
40,000
36,000
Esti..zna.ted
Maturity
12-1.-1.973
1.2-1.-1974
1.2-1.-1.975
1.2-1.-1.976
1.2-1.-1.977
12-1.-1.978
12-1-1.979
"B"
Coupon Rate
Dates for '"a•• Coupons to Run
-:3 -
•
•
• •
-
-
-
-
---
_____ _...
The i..nterest cost on t.hi....s proposa1 i.s a.& fo11ows:
Interest Cost "A" Coupon
Xnterest Cost "B" Coupon
Tot.a1. Interest Cost
Effect:i.ve Rate -------~'
We attach hereto a cert1£i.ed check payab1.e to the City of Eng1ewood,
Co1orado. 1n the amount o£ $1.0.000 as evidence of our good fai.th;
and i.f we are the successfu1 purchasers of these bonds. said check
i.s to be cashed by you and i.s to app1y on the purchase pri.ce of sai.d
bonds_ Sa.i.d check represents fu...11 1i.qu.i.da.ted d.amage.s i...n the e"Vent we
should fa.i.1 or neg1ec:t to take up and pay for sa:i.d bonds i...n accordance
wi.th the terms of this proposa1. If we are not the successfu1
purchasers , our check i.s to be returned to us i..ramed...i.a.te1.y_ It i..a
our understanding that the suc:cessfu1 purchase wi.11 be dete~ed
at the City Counci.1 meeting on May 1, 1972, or at a 1.ater adjournment
of sai.d meeting.
It i.s understood and agreed that you wi.11 furnish the fu11.y prLnted
bonds~ a cert1f~ed transcript o£ proceedings author1zing s~d bonds
and the approving 1ega1 op~~on of W111son & Lamm~ Denver. Co1orado~
free of expense. Xn acco rdance -ith the Notice o£ Sa1e and/or
custornary pract1ce f or the de1i.very of bonds . these bonds wi11 be
avai1ab1e for de1ivery -ithin GO days.
Respect£u11y submitted .
By·------------------------------------
Date __________________________________ _
·-
--
-
•
•
• -
G.ENERA.L XNFO.R.MATION
Th Ci. y o~ En9 ..-ood.. .Lncorporated May 13, 1903, is 1oc::at.ed
~d1-a l.y ad ac-~ 'U:> and d~ec::tl.y aou t.h of the Ci..ty and County o£
nve:r. E:ng ood • • 1 70 ~l.at:Lon a..s reported by the Census Bureau
w as 33 .. 6 5. T C~~Y conta~ns ar a of 5.9 square mi.l.es.
Form of Government
Eng~ewood has operated under a Cou.ncil.-M.a.nager form of city
qo~ernment s::a._nce 1952 . A Home Ru1e Charter which provides the basic
l.ega1 framework of the City was adopted in 1958.
Transportation
Engl.ewood i.s dissected by u.s. 285 (east-west), u.s . as (north-
south), a..nd i..s served by the other maJor highways and freeways wh ich
converge into the metropo1i..tan area.
North -south routes of the Denver ~ Rio Grande and Atchison ,
T opeka & Santa Fe Rai.l.roads run through the western po.r-ti..o:n of the City.
Eng1ewood is 1ocated wi.thi...n a few minutes dri.ve of Denver•s
Stap1eton Airport and the new1y constructed Arapahoe County ALrport .
School. System
Most of the Ci..ty of E:ngl.ewood. and a11 of the properties
i...nc.l.ude.d wi..th:i.n Pav:Lng District No. 21 1ie wi.thi...n the boundary of
Schoo1 District No . 1, Arapahoe County. The h1gh qua1ity of education
offered ~ thi.s district i..s we11 known throughout the state and i.s one
of the reasons why Eng1ewood ~s considered a good p1ace to 1ive in the
metropo1i..tan area.
Schoo1 District No . 1 ~s 1evyLng a tota1 of 68.41 m111s for
1 9 72 1 an increase of 1.466 m111s over the previous year. A tota1 of
$3,634,002 in bonds is present1y outstanding with one issue 1n the
amount of $624;065 to be retired by 1 9 73 and the remaining $3,009,937
to be retired by 1979.
and apart
Engl.ewood
Loca1 Economy
Enq1ewood, as an econo~ic unit, cannot be viewed as separate
from the Denver metropo1itan area. Nonethe1ess~ viewing
separate1y~ the City•s deve1opment has been consi.derab1e.
J.:n 1968 the Ci...ndere11a Ci.ty Shoppi..n.q Center opened. There
are cu.rrent1y 201 retail. sa1es out1ets i...n the Center, an increase of 18
over 1ast year.
There are cu.rre.nt1y 1~896 busi..n.esses 1ice.nsed by the Ci.ty a .s
opposed to 1,670 1ast year.
•
• •
-
•
•
•
0 -
-PAVING DISTRICT NO 21-
STREETS
ALLEYS
REVISED
•
tf/29/71 RAK
3/13/ 72 H'-'0
• •
---
-
-
•
• -
Assessed Va1u.a t~on Data
Pav~ng District No. 21
Devel.oped Parcel.s
Num.ber Pa.rc:el.s
Val.uation of Land
Val.uation of Lmprovements
Undeveloped Parcel.s
Number Pa.rc:el.s
Val.uation of Land
Land and Improvements
Land use
392
$ 679,820
1.,421.,9 70
64
$•_----'7'-7'--'-'• B~O"'O"'
$2 ,1.79 .. 590
~ Imp r ovements ~
Residential-Improved $242,620 $ 572.,340 $ 81.4.,960
Residential.-UnLmproved 35,640 -o -35 .. 640
Commercia1 -Lmproved 31.6,750 61.1.,300 928 ,050
Commercial.-Unimproved 34 ,630 -o-34 .. 630
Industrial.-Improved 1.02,750 203,380 306 .,1.30
Industrial-Unimproved 4,980 -0 -4,980
Mi.sce1.1.aneous 20,250 34,950 55,200
Total. $757,620 $2.1.79 ,590
Assessed Val.uatio n
Improved Property (Land and Improvements) $2 .,101 ,790
Unimproved Property 77,800
Tota1 $2 ,179 ,590
•
Percent
Assessed
Va.l.uati.on
of District
37.39'-
1 .64
42.58
1..59
1.4.05
.23
~
1.00.00'
Percent
• •
•
• .. -
The Fun-d ba.~a.nce of th Surpl.u s and Oefi.ci..enc-y Fund has
grown apprec~abl.y over the past several. years as ref1ected by the
fo1101Wii.Ln9:
1.965
1.966
1.967
1968
1.969
1 9 70
1.97 1
$ 76 ,093
163 ,279
169 ,239
213,551
284,745
304,5 40
371;352
T h e ful.l. amount of the Ci.ty•s s hare of the Distri ct ($76,384)
was appropriated in the 1 9 72 operating budget adopted by the Council. on
December 6 , 1.971.
Cost Esti..mates
The cost of Paving Dis tric t No. 21 of $587,090 is based
upon the f ol.l.owing detai.l.ed estimates:
Type of Improvement
Asphal.t pavi.ng on streets 36 " wide
Asphal.t pav~g on s treets 44' wide
Concret e a l.l.ey paving 14" wide
Pavi...n.g of other -idt.hs sha11 be in
proportion to the above estimates:
4'' thi.ck cu.r bwal.k, Type II
vertica l. curb a.n.d gutter
Si.dewal.k 4' wide
6'' thick concrete sl.a.b
-7 -
Est:i.mated Cost
$9 .03 per front foot
$15.48 per front foot
$9.62 per front foot
$8.25 per front foot
$5.12 per front foot
$5.00 per front foot
$1..65 per square foot
•
• •
-
-
-
0 -
--~~---------------------
General. Descr~pt~on
Paving District No . 21 was establ.ished by O rdinance No. 7~
Series of 1972~ which was adopted on final. readLng February 22, 1972.
Said ordinance was antend.ed by Ordi.na.nce No. 9 1 Series o£ 1972, whi...ch
was adopted on final. reading March 20, 1 97 2. The District was created
for the purpose of constructing and i...n.stal.l.i...n.g certain street pavi...n.g,
curb, gutter , and si...dewal.k ~provements, necessary drainage Lmprovements,
and a11ey pavi...n.g throughout the Ci..ty of Eng1ewood as shown on the map on
page 9 . A total. of 83 percent of the 4 51 parcel.s 1n the Oi..stri..ct are
iJnproved. Th e total. cost of this project 1s $587 ,090 , of which $76,384
wi..l.l. be assumed by the Ci..ty of Engl.e-ood. The remai...ni...ng costs are to
be assessed to the property owners to be benefited by these improvements.
Purpose of Bond Issue
The bond .i..ssu e :i..s necessary to f:Lnance that portion of the
.i..mprovements which wi11 be assessed to the benef.i..ted properties.
Security
T he bonds are payab1e from the proceeds of speci.a1 assessments
to be 1evi.ed against the property w.i..th~ the District spec.i..a1 1y benef.i..ted
by the construction of the improvements. The bonds are addit.i..ona11y
secured by the Spec.i..a1 Surp1us and Def.i..ciency Fund .
The Specia1 Surp1us and Defic.i..ency Fund: Section 108 o f the
C.i..ty Charter. which Section became operative Ju1y 21. 1 958. states:
Whenever a pub1ic Lmprovement district has paid
and ca.nce1ed four -fifths of its bonds out...stan.d:Lnq:
and for any reason the re.rn.a.i.n.i.nq: assessments are
n o t paid in t .i..me to take up the fLna1 bonds of the
district and interest due thereon and there .i..s not
sufficient money .i.n said spec.i..a1 surp1us and defi-
ciency fund . then the City sha11 pay said bonds
when due and interest due thereon and reimburse
itse1f by co11ecting the unpaid assessments due
said Distr.i..ct (emphasis added).
As of December 31. 1 971. the Speci.a1 Surpl.us and Defi.c.i..e.ncy
Fund had a bal.ance of $371.352. Thi.s ba1ance was composed of $306.186
i..n cash. i..nvest.me.nts and current assets and $65 ,166 i.n a.ssess.ments
recei.vah1e and other 1ong -term assets . The ba1ance of the fund has
i.ncreased $66 .812 since December 31. 1970. The Fund has no 1iabi.1it.i..es .
-6 -
--
-
Dated: June 1,. 1972
•
• -
PR>SPECTUS
$51.1 ,000
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ,. COLORADO
PAVING DISTRICT NO. 21
SPECLAL ASSESSMENT BONDS
Due: June 1., 1983
Principal. and se.In.i-a.n.nua.l. interest (June 1 and Decetnber 1,
first coupon due June 1 , 1973) payabl.e at the First Nati.o.nal. Bank of
Engl.ewood in Engl.ewood , Col.orado.
These bonds are subject to prior redemption in numerical.
order on any interest payment date upon t.hi..rty (30) days publ.i.shed
notice at par and accrued interest .
$210,.000
77 ,000
56,000
46,000
46 ,000
40 .. 000
36,000
DENOMINATION -$1.,000
ESTIMATED REDEMPTXON SCHEDULE
Estimated Date of Payment
1.2-1 -1973
12-1-1974
12-1-1975
12 -1 -1976
12-1-1977
12-l..-1978
12 -1 -1.979
The a.l:>ove esti...mat.ed payment dates are based upon the experi-
ence o£ r edemption by the City. The accuracy of the estimate is not
guaranteed.
-5 -
•
• •
'32xl
-
•
•
•
•
• -
Subject to the right of the City o £ Eng1ewood to reject any
and a11 bids received, said bonds w i11 b e a warded o n the bid r epre-
senting the 10"West net interest cost to the City based upon the
est:i.mated dates of paym.ent as set forth above_ S&..i..d bonds wi.....11 be
payab1e from assessments to be 1evied aga inst the property within
the District specia~1y benefited by the construction of the improve-
ments_
The Charter of said City provi des :
Whene ver a pub1ic improvement district has paid
and ca.nce11ed four-f.i..fth.s o£ its t:J,c,nds outsta..n.di.ng
and for any reason the remain.ing assessments are
not paid i..n t:Lm.e to take up the fi.na1 bonds of
the dis trict and interest due the reon and there
is not sufficient money in s ai..d speci.a.1 surp1us
and deficiency fund, t .hen the City shal..1 pay said
bonds when due and i..nterest due thereon and rei..m
burse i..tse1£ by co1~ecti.nq the unpaid assessments
due said Dis trict (emphasis added)_
A11 bids must be unconditiona1 and s ha11 be accompanied by
a cashier•s or certified check 1n the amount of $10,000 payab1e to
the City o£ Enq1ewood_ Checks of unsuccessfu1 bidders wi..11 be prompt1y
returned_ The good fa.i..th deposi..t wi..11 be credi..ted tc::;, the purchaser at
the ti..me de1 i.very of the bonds i..s made; and i..f the su.ccessfu1 bi..dde.r
sha11 fai.....1 or neg1~ct to comp1ete the puzchase of said bonds i.n
accordance w1.t.b hi..s bi..d , the amount of h.i.s deposit &ha11 be he.1d by
the Ci..ty as 1i..qui.dated damages_
The City o£ Eng1ewood reserves the pri..vL.l.ege of waiving any
i.rregul.a.ri.ty or i..n.forma~i..ty i.n any bi...d_
De1i..ve ry w i.11 be made a t the office of the Director o£ F~ance
i..n Eng1ewood, Co1orado , or e 1sewhere at the request and expense o f the
purchaser_ It is antici-pa t ed that de1i..very o f the bonds w i11 be made on
or about June 16, 1972.
Addi..ti..ona1 Lnformati.on concerning this issue and the D istri-ct
may be obtained from Mr_ Wi.11i.am L. Mc:Di..vi.tt,. Di..rector of Finance, Ci.ty
Ha11 , Eng1ewood, Co1orado •
The C i..ty of Eng1ewood wi..11 furnish the prLnted bonds, a
certified transcript of 1ega1 proceedLngs and the approving opini.on
of Mess r s_ Wi11son & Lamm, Attorneys at Law, Denver, Co1orado _ A
certi.fi.ed copy of s aid approving opinion wi..11 be printed upon each
bond wi..thout addi..ti.ona1 cost_
DATED at Eng1ewood , Co1orado, as of the 3rd day of Apr~1 ,
1 9 72_
/S/ M i1ton E. Senti.
ATTE5'T: Mayor
/s/ Wi..11iam L-McDivitt
Director of FLnance
4 -
•
•
• •
T 32X
-
---
....
NOT:XCE OF BOND SALE
CrrY OF ENGLEWOOD~ COLORADO
PAVING OJ:STR.ICT NO. 21
BID OPENXNG: APRIL 27, 1972
10:00 A.M.
NOTICE :XS HEREBY GrvEN that the City of Engl.ewood. Col.orado,
wi11 rece~ve sea1ed bids at the o~fice of the Director of F~ance at
-
th.e City H.a11 i..n E:ngl.ewoetd, Co1oradc:t, until.. 10:00 A.M., M.D.T., on
Thursday, April. 27, 1972, for the purchase of $511,000 City of Engl.ewood,
Col.orado, Paving District No. 21 Special Assessment Bonds. Said bond.s
are to be dated June 1 , 1972, and due June 1, 1983, subject to prior
redemption 1n dir~ct numerical. order on any interest pay~ent date upon
thirty (30) days publ.i.shed notice upon payment of par and accrued inter-
est. The bonds sha11 be i...n denomination of $1,000, :numbered 1 through
511...
The &W"ard of the contract wil.l. be made by the City Counci.l.
8:00P.M., May 1, 1972, or at an adjournment of the requl.ar Council.
meetLng o f that date.
Interest on said bonds sha...11. be pa.yabl.e on June 1., 1973~ and
sem.i.-a.n.nua.11.y thereafter on June 1 a.nd Deceznber 1, each year, to be
evidenced by one or more sets of interest coupons.
For the purpose of co~parLson onl.y, bids sha11 be submitted
on the fol.l.owing est~ated d .a.tes of payment which are strict1y an
estLmate based on past experience and are Ln no way guaranteed.
$210,000
77,000
56,000
46,000
46,000
40~000
36 ,000
EstLmated Date of Payment
12-1.-1973
12-1.-1.974
12-1-1.975
1.2-l.-1.976
1..2 -1-1..977
12-l.-1.978
12-l..-1.979
The pr i.nci.pa1 and :Lnterest on said bonds sha.l.l. be pa.yabl.e
at the First National. Bank of Engl.ewood ~ Engl.ewood~ Co1orado.
The bonds wil.l. bear Lntere&t at a rate or rates not exceeding
1.0 percent per annum and wil.l. be sol.d at not l.ess than par and accrued
i..nterest to dates of del..i.very. Di..ffere.nt or separate ••A" and ... B .. coupon
rates may be bid for each estimated date of payment, but bi..ds based on
spl.it coupon rates for any one estLmated payment date wil.l. not be accept-
a..bl.e.
-3 -
••
--
r 32x
-
•
•
•
• -
PROSPECTUS AND NOTICE OF SALE OF
$511,000
CXTY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
PAVXNG OI.STR.XCT NO. 21.
SPECXAL ASSESSMENT BONDS
BID O PENING: APRIL 27, 1972r 1.0:00 A.M .
M.i.l.ton E. Senti.
liooward R. Brown
Paul. T. Bl.essing
D&l.l.as J. Dhori.ty
Judith B. Henning
John J _ Lay
El.me.r E. Schwab
CITY COUNCXL
A.DM.INI.STRAT rvE OFFIC:I:A.LS
Sta..nl.ey H. Dial..
Wi.l.1.i.am L. HcDi.vi.tt
Bernard v. Be.ra.rdi..ni.
K.el.l..s Waggoner
BOND COUNSEL
Wi.l.l.son & La.mm
Attorneys at Law
Denver, Col.orado
Mayor
Mayor Pro Tem
Counci.l....ma..n
cou.n.ci.1Lna..n
Counci.l...woma..n
Cou..nci.l.ma.n
Counci..l....ma..n
City M.a..nager
Director of Fi..na..nce
City Attorney
Director o£ Pub1.i..c Wor ks
The Lnformati.on Ln this prospectus has been prepared fro~ information
obtained fro~ offi.ci.al.s of various other governmental. and private
organizations as w el.l. as the City of Engl.ewood and, whi.l.e not guaran-
teed. Ls bel.i.eved to be rel.i.&bl.e. Additional. information and copies
of the prospectus may be obtaLned from Wi11~am L-McDivitt, Director
of Finance, Department of Finance, 3400 South E1ati Street, Eng1ewood,
Colorado_
PREPA.RED BY
Wi11iam L-McDivitt
Director of Fi.na.nce
April 3, 1972
~--~.~---------------------·7~.-------~--~--~~--~.~~~ ..
•
• •
I' 32 X 'I
-
-
-
-
• -
FROH: Chier C1a..sby
.nn.-.,-,;; •• ..> 2
It aha.11 be un1a~ ror the proprietor or keeper or a.ny tavern to
Dt?I....OY or per:n:i.t any m:1.nor under the .a.ge or twenty-one years to ~:reque..nt
or be ~ or abo ut such place, un1ess accomp anied oy a parent. or to drLnk
any into~eatin& 1iquors or beer or any other fermen~ed ~t beverage ~
about the &a.t::le • or to engage or pa..rticipa:te in any ga%:Je or bi.11..:l.a.rc:ia •
or any gan:e. bet, or wager w:it.h any cards or .a..ny o't;.b.er gacb1.1ng de~c••
any o~e.r &&me whatsoever in or about such p1ace.
Obviously Cll.s orc:ti...n.ance p.ro.h..1b:i.t.s a=lYOD.e under 2..1. yea.re or age to
be (1) employed or (2) to consum.e beer or a.n:y other f'e~nted ma1t beTera.ge
:1..n any-tavern.
Th:i.s ordin::l.Oce ~a i..n direct co~et with ata.te statu:te 'Wb.:l.c:h. a.1..1owa
e-i-ghteen year ol..d.s to consu.me beer at the 3-~ eata.b.l..isnments. It wou.l..d
a.l..so. as it seems to me, :Co11ow, tl::l.at persons u.:nder 2.1 cou.1d be empl..oyeed
~ such estabiisnmen~•-
J.hlzl:i.cipa].. Ord.:l.n.a.nee 1.1.~-2 and. l..:L-Cs-:3 aeem to adequ.atel..y regu1a.ta
bi11ia.rda and pool. b..a.1.1a . The atat.e atatutea do re~a.te age l..:i..m:l.t.a ~or
aerv:i...ng and conaum.i.ng: 3.~ beer. T'ne.re'£ore. :f"u.rt.b.er con.s:Lderation a.b.ou.1d
be E;iven with rega..rcts to ordina:nce 11-ts-4.
..:.. •
--
r
•
•
•
I "-'TRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCIL'1A..'I
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONI~G ORDIN&'ICE
(ORDI NANCE NO. 26, SERIES 1 963 ) BY ADDING THERETO A NEW
S UBCHAPTER , 22 .4A, ENTITLED, "PLANNED DEVELOPl'1E~'T (P. D.)
DISTRICT," AUTHORIZING SAID DISTRICT TO BE SUPERIHPOSED
UPON OR COMBINED WITH ANY OTHER ZONED DISTRICT WITHIN THE
CITY ; RE0UIRING THE APP LICATION, REVIEW &'10 APPROVAL
THEREOF; AND PROVIDI NG STANDARDS THEREFORE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as fo11ows:
Section 1. That the Co~prehensive Zoning Ordinance,
Ordinance No. 26, Series 1963, is hereby amended by adding a
new subchapter thereto, being 22.4A, ent::it:1ed, "P1a.nned
I>eve1opment: (P.O.) District:.'' Said new subchapter reads
as fo11o-ws :
22.4A-1. Legis1at:ive Purpose and Intent:
The purpose of this subchapter is t:o permit
and encourage diversification in the 1ocat:ion of
structures and the appropriate re1at:ionship of
various uses and structures to their sites without:
inhibit:Lng the pot:ent:ia1 advantages of new and
Lmaginat:ive techniques and concepts of design
of urban 1and use. These regu1at::ions are further
intended to insure improved pedestrian and vehicu1ar
c~rcu1ation, faci1ities and the provision of usab1e
open space wbi1e insuring adequate standards re1ating
to the pub1ic hea1th. safety. we1fare and conven-
ience in the use and occupancy of bui1dings and
faci1ities. The amenities and compatiui1ities of
the P1anned Deve1opment c1assification are to be
insured to the adoption of a deve1opment p1an,
which sha11 consist of maps, diagrams and written
statements setting forth 1and use re1ationships
and deve1opment standards. The P1anned Deve1opment
c1assification is to be app1ied to 1and on1y upon
specific app1ication by the owner. or authorized
representatives of the owner of the 1and and after
approva1 by the City P1anning and Zoning Commission;
construction on said 1and sha11 take p1ace on1y
after the approva1 of the Commdssion and the Deve1op-
ment p1an and its attendant documents have been
recorded in the Office of the C1erk and Recorder of
Arapahoe County, Co1orado.
-1-
II • •
I' 32 X I (
-
-
-
22.4A-2. Requirements
(a) The P.O. D~strict may be combined with any
other zoned district and sha11 be subject to the
provisions of this ordinan ce~ as we11 as the basic
zoning district ~th which it is combined . Where
a conflict occurs bet~een an approved P.D. and the
regulations of the underlying zoning district~ the
approved P.O. shall prevail, except ~th regard to
permitted uses, dwe11ing unit density, and off-
street parking requirements.
(b) In order to encourage good design and
f1exibi1ity, the City Planning and Zoning Co~ssion
may waive a11 or part of the subdivision regulations
applicable to the development, if it is assured
that a11 public improvements and conveniences ~11
be consummated through other documents and agreements.
(c) The City P1anning and Zoning Comm1ssion may
~aive up to and inc1uding twenty-five -(25) percent
of the off-street parkLng requirements as estab1ished
by Chapter 22.5 -5 of the Zoning Ordinance~ subject~
ho~ever~ to the standards estab1ished pursuant to
Section 6(e) of this Chapter.
22.4A-3. Pre-App1ication Conference
A pre-a.pp1ication co·nference sha.11 be he1d 'With
the staff of the Department of Community Deve1opment
in order for the app1icant to become acquainted 'With
the P1anned Deve1opment procedures and re1a.ted City
requirements.
22_4A-4. App1icati..on
An app1icati..on £or approva1 of a P1anned
Deve1opment may be fi1ed by the owner or owners of
the 1a.n.d or by a person h.a:v-i..ng an i..n.t:ere.st in the
property that is to be inc1uded in Che P1anned
Deve1opment~ provided that such app1Lcation sha11
be acco~panied by the written authorizAtion for
such action signed by the owner or owners of sa~d
1and~ together with a statement signed by the owner
or owners that they a g ree to be bound by the
regu1ations and conditio~s which ~11 be effective
W'i.th the approva1 and recording of the Deve 1opment
P1an. The app1ication sha.11 be made on a form pro-
vided by the City and sha11 be accompanied by p1ans
and written statements sho~ng the fo11owing infor-
tn.ation:
-2-
--
•
•
•
(a) Pre1iminarv P1ans. A Pre~iminary P1an
sho~ing the major detai1s of the proposed P1anned
Oeve1opn:te:nt at a sca1e of not 1ess t han 1'' -50'
and in sufficient detai1 to eva1uate the 1a.nd
p1anning~ bui1ding design ~ and o t her fea t ures
o f t he p ro posed deve1opmen t . T h e P r e1imin ary
P 1 an s mus t c ontain. i n s o f ar as i s app 1icab 1 e,
the f o 11 o~ng minimum information :
1 . A Boundary Survey;
2. The existing to p o g ra p hic character of the 1and ;
3. The propos e d 1 a n d use s ;
4. The 1ocation of a11 existing and propose d bui1ding s,
structure s and i m p r ovem ents ;
5. The density and t ype of de~e11ings, inc1uding
typica1 e1evations and showing maximum h e i g ht;
6. The major points of access to pub1ic rights-of-way ,
the interna1 traffi c and c i rcu1ation syste~, if
app1icab1e~ off-street parking areas~ service
areas, and 1oading areas;
7. The 1ocation, heig ht and size of proposed signs,
fences~ 1ighting and advertising devices ~nc1uding
typica1 e1evations;
8. Areas which are to be conveyed~ dedicated or
reserved for pub1ic purposes, inc1uding, but
not 1imited to~ parks and recreationa1 areas,
schoo1s, pub1ic bui1dings, or other pub1ic
purposes;
9. Areas subject to a 100-year f1ooding cyc1e;
10. A genera1 1andscape p1an ~th major types of
mater~a1s designated as to purpose;
11. DesLgnation of various stages for construction,
i.f app1i.cab1e.
(b) Written Statement. The WTitten state-
ment ~th the PLanned Deve1opment app1ication
sha11 contain the fo11owing minimum information :
1. A statement of the present ownersh ~p and a 1ega1
description of a1 1 of the 1and ~c1uded in the
P1anned Oeve1opment;
2. An e~p~anation of the objectives to be achieved
by the deve1opment, Lnc1udLng bui1ding descriptions,
sketches, or e1evatio~s as may be necessary to
describe the objectives;
3. A deve1opment schedu 1e indicating the approxLmate
date when construction o f the deve1opment or stag es
of the deve1opme nt can be expected to begin and
4.
to be comp1eted;
Copies of any specia1 agreements, conveyances,
restrictions, or covenants which ~11 govern the
use, maintenance and protection of the deve1opment
and pub1ic areas.
-3-
• •
-
-
-
(c) The applicant may submit any ocher
~nformation or exhibits deemed pertinent to the
eva1uation of the proposed P1anned Oeve1opment.
22.4A-5. Review and Approva1
(a) Upon receipt of the app1ication~ the
Department of Communit y Deve1opment sha11 be responsib1e
for coord i nating the review of the deve1opment p1ans
by the ~arious City departments and appropriate pub1ic
agencies cu~natin g in the submission of an advisory
report and recommendation to the City P1anning and
Zoning Commdssion. Submission of the report and
recommendations sha11 be accomp1ished ~ithin t hirt y
(30) days after the fi~in g of the comp~ete app~i
cation. A copy of the advisory report and recommen-
dations sha11 be furnished to the app1icant .
(b) Within thirty (30) days after having
received such report. the Commission. upon proper
notice. sha11 ho1d a pub1ic hearing on the app1ication.
The app1icant sha11 post the property of the proposed
P1anned Deve1opment. in a for,m prescribed by the
Department of Co"CDDlnni..ty Deve1opment. and sha11 give
written notice of the pub1ic hearing.
(c) Within sixty (60) days from the date of
the Pub1ic Hearing, the City P1annLng and Zoni..ng
Commdssion sba11 ~ake wri..tten fLndings either approving,
conditiona11y approving or disapproving the proposed
p~an. A copy of said findings sh~~ be furnished to
the app1icant. In the event, however, that the Com-
mdssion sha11 approve or conditiona11y approve any
proposed P.D. by ~ess than two-thirds (2/3) vote of
its entire membership, then said P.D. sha11 not
become effective but sha11 be forwarded to the City
Counci1 ~thout unreasonab1e de1ay for review and
fi..na1 a.pprova1 or disapprova1. The Ci..t :r Counci1
may req~ire a Pub1ic Hearing prior to the fina1
approva1 or disapprova1 of the proposed P1anned
Deve1optlliiE!!nt.
(d) A~1 approved site p~ans for P~anned Deve~op
ments. inc1uding modifications or conditions, sha11
be endorsed by the Chairman of the Ci t y P1anning and
ZonLng Commdssion and sha11 be recorded in the Office
of the Arapahoe County C1erk and Recorder.
{e) Any person app1ying to the courts for a
review of any decision made under the terms of this
Chapter sha~1 app~y for review within thirty (30)
-4-
• -
-
-
-
days after the date of decision and sha11 be required
to pay the cost of preparing a transcript of pro -
ceedings and the app1ication for review sha11 be in
the nature of certiorari under Ru1e 106(a)(4) of
the Co1orado Ru1es of Civi1 Procedure.
22 .4A-6. S t andar ds
Befo re approving a P1 anned Oeve1opmen t, the
approvi n g agenc y s h a 11 make written f Lnd ~g s that
the P1anned Deve 1 opmen t ~11 Lmp 1ement the purposes
o f t his Ordinanc e and o f t hi s C h apter, and, in
addi t i o n , meet the f o 11 o~ng requirements :
(a) U ses P e rmit t e d: The uses in the P1anned
Dev e 1 op1Dent m u .st be ''p erurl..tted b y right'' or a p prove d
as ''perurl.tte d by s pec i.a 1. revi...ew'' in the Zone D i strict
in which t he P 1 anned Dev e 1.opment i s 1ocated_
(b ) The P1anned Deve1opment :Ls cons:Lstent w:Lth
the intent of the Co~prehensive P1an and the po1icies
therein.
(c) The P1anned Deve1opment's re1ationship
to its surrounding s sha11 be considered in order to
avoid adverse effects to the existing and possib1e
future deve1opment caused by traffic circu1ation.
bui1ding height or bu1k, 1ack of screening, or
intrusions of privacy .
(d) M±n~um requi rements for usab1e open space
~11 be met through t h e overa11 design and amenit i es
proposed for the deve1opt:nent . Private park and/or
recreationa1 areas, owned in common, may be considered
to meet the mi~um usab1e open space requirements if
the Commission determines that such areas ~11 meet
the fo11o~ng r equirements:
1-The area ~11 be o f suffic i e nt size to
adequate1y serve the entire deve1opment
f or wh:Lc h :Lt :Ls des:Lgned.
2. The area is accessib1e and avai1ab1e to
a11 of the occupants of dwe11ing units
for whose use it is intended_
3. The area ~11 be used and is suitab1e for
scenic, 1 ands caping , recreation a 1 , or a 1 1
of the a.£orementi.on.ed purposes.
-5-
• -
-
-
•
(e) The n~b er of off-street parking spaces in
the proposed deve1opment sha11 not be 1ess than the
requirements of Chapter 22.5 -5 of this Ordinance~
provided, however, that the P1anning and Zoning Co~
mdssion may waive up to and inc1uding twenty-five (25)
percent of said requirements in any zoned district.
if one or more of the fo11o~ng factors are found to
exist:
1. The probab1e number of automobi1es owned
or used by occupants of the proposed deve1op -
t:nent w-i.1.1 be 1ess than typi..ca.11y found i..n.
si..mi1.ar deve1opments .
2. The parking needs of non-residentia1. uses
~1.1. 1.essen the overa1.1 parking needs of
the deve1op1DIE!:n.t.
3. Varying time periods of usage by mixed uses
in the deve 1 opment ~11. 1essen overa11
parking requirements.
4. The property owners ~11 participate in a
mandatory parking district which ~11
adequate1y meet the off-street parking
needs of the deve1opment.
(f) S~te P1ann~ng : The approv~ng agency sha11
be satisfied that the site p1an for the P1anned Deve1op-
ment meets a11 of the fo11o~ng requirements:
1. The P1anned Deve1op'II'Itent must be p1anned in
re1ationship to the surrounding area, and
~ust be 1andscaped. In addition, the site
p1an must contain a 25-foot buffer strip
2 .
in any proposed deve1opment ~hich w111
inc1ude mu1tip1e fami1y or non-residentia1
bui1dings or structures which is adjacent
to a sing1e fami1y residentia1 use district.
The buffer strip sha11 be kept free of
bui1dings or structures and must be 1and-
scaped, screened, or protected by natura1
features, so that adverse effects on sur-
rounding areas are minimdzed;
Within the P1anned Deve1opment, spacing must
be provided between bui1dLngs and structures .
gi~ng consideration co their intended use,
their 1ocation, design and height, the p 1 ace-
DM!Dt and ex tent of facing window areas. and
the topog raphy and such other natura1 features
as W'i11 assure privacy and a p1ea...san.t: env-i.ron.-
toent;
-6-
• •
•
•
3.
4.
5.
22.4A-7.
•
If the area of the deve1opment is suc h that
an interna1 street circu1ation s y stem is
necessary, such sys t em sha11 be designed
for the type of traffic to be g enerated.
A11 P1anned Deve1opme nts must have access
to pub1ic stree ts. Private, interna1
streets may be permitted if t hey can be
used by po1ice and fire department vehic1es
for e~ergency purposes;
Pedestrian ~ays must provide convenient
and safe access to residentia 1 b~i1ding
groups, open space areas, recreationa 1
areas, schoo1s and neighborhood shopping
areas if they are a part of the P1anned
Deve1opment, and must be separated as much
as possib1e from vehicu1ar traffic a r eas;
The site p1an sha11 provide for the maxLmum
preservation of natura1 drainage areas,
vegetation and other desirab1e natura1
features.
Oeve1opmenc in Stages
The approving agency may authorize the imp1e-
mentation of the deve 1 opment p1an in stages. However.
for each a~thorized stage of p1anned deve1opmenc. any
private or pub1ic park area co be conve y ed. dedicated.
or reserved sha11 be of sufficient size to serve the
dwe11ing unit densit y for that stage or of sufficient
s~ze to serve the dwe11ing unit density for the entire
deve1opment_ If the conveyance. dedication or reserva-
tion of the pub1ic or private park area is staged. such
park area sha11 be 1ocaced in that part of the P1anned
Deve1opment inc1uded in that stage. or e1se~here in the
P1anned De~e1opment at a 1ocation acc_ssib1e co the
dwe11Lng unit to be provided in that stage.
22.4A-8. Changes in the Deve1opment P1an
E~cept as provided hereafter. no changes may be
~ade in the approved P1anned Deve1opment during its
~p1ementation:
(a) ~nor changes in the 1ocation . setting,
height or character of bui1dings and structures may
be a~thorized by the Director of Community Deve1opment
if req~ired b y engineering or othe r circ~stances not
foreseen at the tLme the deve1opment program ~as
approved. No change authorized by the Director of
Community Deve1opment under this Section may increase
the size of any bui1din g or structure by more than
five (5) percent, nor change the 1ocation of any
bui1ding or structure by ~ore than ten (10) feet in
any direction; and provided that the Director of
Commun1ty Deve1opment may not approve the re1ocation
of any bui1ding or structure so that the bui1ding or
structure is c1os e r to any side or front property
1ine than ~as approved on the Deve1opment P1an.
-7-
• •
-
-
-
(b) A11 other changes in the P1anned Develop-
ment Plan, inc1uding changes in the site p1an and
in the develo pmen t schedu1e, must be made under the
procedures that are app1icab1e to the initia1 approval
of a Planned Development.
22 .4A-9. Annual Review
At 1east o n ce every twelve months, the Department
of Community Development sha11 review all building
permits which have been issued for the Planned Develop-
ment and shall examine the construction which has
taken place on the site. The Director of Community
Deve1opment shall make a report of any violations of
the provisions of this Chapter or of the terms and
conditions of the Development Plan approval to the
Planning Commission, and the Commission shall hold
a hearing on the report of violations submitted by
the Director, having first given written notice to
the P1anned Deve1opment app1icant and a11 owners of
abutting property. Upon review of the a11eged
~o1ations, the Co~ssion may, if it deems necessary,
require that appropriate action be taken to remedy
the vio1ations. If such action is not taken by the
app1~cant with~n th~rty (30) days. or ~f the Commiss~on
determines that it is necessary to amend or mod~fy
the Deve1opment P1an, the Commission may amend, modify
or revoke the approva1 of the Deve1opment P1an giving
WTitten findings therefor.
22.4A-10. Comp1etion of the P1anned Deve1opment
Upon the comp1etion of the P1anned Deve1opment,
the Director of Community Deve1opment sha11 issue a
certificate for the P1anned Oeve1opment certifying
the comp1etion and sha11 note the issuance of the
certificate on an office copy of the officia1 Zoning
Map and on the Site P1an. After comp1etion, the use
of 1and and the construction. modification, or a1ter-
ation of any bui1dings within the P1anned Deve1opment
wi11 be governed by the approved Deve1opment P1an.
22.4A-11.
The City Counci1 may estab1ish a fee schedu1e
for P1anned Deve1opment app1ications to cover the
costs of processing and review.
22.4A-12. Approving Agency
A.s used in this Chapter ... Approv:Lng Agency••
sha11 mean the C~ty P1ann~ng and Zon~ng Comm~ss~on.
-8-
• -
----
•
•
on the
day of
Attest:
•
22 _4A-1.3_ Severabi1i.tv
If any part or parts of th~s subchapter are
for any reason he1d to be inva1id~ such decision
sha11 not affect the va1idity of the remaining
portion of th1s subchapter.
Introduced~ read 1n fu11 and passed on first reading
day of 1.9 72-
Pub1ished as a B111 for an OrdLnance on t he
1.972_
Mayo r
ex offL cLo C Lty C l.erk
I,. ,. do hereby certify
that the above and fore g oing is a true,. accurate a..n.d com.p1ete
co~ of a Bi11 f or an Ordinance~ introduced ~ read ::l.n fu11
and passed o n first reading on t he day o f
1.9 7 2 _
ex offLcLo CLty Cl.erk
-9-
• •