The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1972-06-05 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet• 0 ... • <> Counci1 Me~ting --June S ~ 1 9 72 • • • • • / -1 J COUNCIL CHAMBERS C XTY OF ENGI....EWOOD , COLORAIX> M.J-i.."Y 15, ~972 ~··· J '72 COUNC• = F•LE ClT""t' OF ENGLIE.WC>OD. COLO- The C~ty Counc~1 o the ~1ty o£ Eng1ewood , Arapahoe ~ounty , Co1orado , met regul.ar sess1on on May 15 , 1.472 , a~ 8: 1 P .M. t~q to order. The ~nvocat~on wa s g1ven by Reverend Fred Hahn . Emmanuel. Lutheran Church. lle ~co~ ~l.cq~ance was 1ed by Pack No . 333 . The Mayor skcd £or ro11 ca11. Upon the cal l. of the rol.l., the fol.l.owing present: Council. Members Schwab , Lay , Henning , Dhori~y . Brown , Blessing , Sent1 . Absent: None The Mayor decl.ared a quorum present . • Also present were: City Manager Dial. As sis tant C ity Manager McDiv itt City Attorney Berard ini COUNCI LWO MAN HENNING MC>VED , COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED , THAT THE M.XNUTES OF THE REG~ MEETING OF MAY 1 , 1.972 , BE APPROVED 1\S READ . Upon the ca11 of the rol.l., the vote resul.ted as £ol.l.ow&: Ayes ; Counci1 Members Sch wab~ Lay ~ HennLng~ Dhority ~ Brown ~ B1esaLng~ Senti. Nay s; None Absent~ None The Mayor dec1arcd the motLon carr1ed. Mayor S nti recoqn1.z. d t.h fo1101W1...n9 peopl.e :t.rom the l..i..st o.C S):)'ec:.i..ol. C.i.t..i..zen P roqcam InviteeS; M~. and Me~. Berry S. Thamp on . Jr .~ 3780 South E1at1 Street ~ Prec~ncL No. 4. Mx . Thompson quesL.i..oned whe ~er th height o£ the newT. W. Anderson Bui1d~ng con£ormed o the City 's height regu1a 1.on~. Mr. Sup.i.nger was recognized from the audience and a a ed thaL 1.t did Mr. and Mrs . L1oyd A. Walters ~ .Jr .~ 3600 South Pea r1 Street , Precinct No . e. Mr. and Mrs. O a v1d Taf oya ~ 3 101 South Cherokee Street ~ Precinct N o . 2. Hr . Tafoya noted that the intersection of F1oy d and Cherokee was extremely b usy and wondered .i..£ the C1ty had ever stu i.ed the poss.i.b1.lity of c:ontro11~g i t . C ~ty Manager 01a1 noted that the Traffic Division was studying that particular .Lntersecti.on and that perhap s through the budget:Lng process a change w o u ld be m .a de • • • - -2 - Mr . Robert~-Le~qh . Project Engineer , A1an M. Voorhees & Associates~ presented the Western ~apahoe County Transportat~on Study , Eng1ewood Supp1ement . Mr. Leigh noted that there were three qenera1 traffic prob1ems ~n Eng1ew ood . O ne , there was a 1ack o£ continuity 1n the arteria1 stree system ; t~o . the prob1ems of growth were p1acLng staggering demands upon the trafL~c system ; and hree , there was a 1 a ck of adequate mass transLt SCr"'.'.1Ce . In g enera1, he said there were three so1ution s: (1) Estab1 ish better h1ghway contLnuity, espec ia11y in the eastern portion of h e study area . (2) Obtain addi iona1 capacity on the arteria1 streets in the area; and f3) Expand the mass tran&Lt s ervice Ln the area . He suggested that he proposed Co1 umbine Freeway separate from Santa Fe Drive shou1d not be bui1t ~ especia11y i f che proposed tran s it expectations come to pass. Hence ~ a major upgrading of South Santa Fe Drive ~as in order . M r . Leigh then referred to the study , a copy of ~hich is enc1osed in the officia1 records of the C ity C1erk , and discussed each project brief1y. The pro j ects discussed Project 1 . S anta Fe Drive {US 85) Project 2. US 285 Project 3 . C1arkson Street Pro~ect 4 . Qu 1 ncy Avenue ProJ e Ct 5 . W1ndermere Avenue Pro3ect G . P 1atte River Drive Recommendations: Upgrade and reconstruct South Santa Fe Drive to six-1ane, 1im1ted access expressway standards throughout the city o f Eng1ewood, and provide for des~gnation of two 1anes as express bus and car poo1 1a..nes. Recommendation: Upgrade US 285 to ~u11 ~ree~ay standards west of Santa Fe (US 85) a..nd upgrade and i..mprove US 285 o 1imi ted access express~ay standards east of Santa Fe. Reconunendation: Lmpro ve and/or reconstruc t C1arkson Street as a two-1ane m1nor arteria1 s treet (44 " curb-to-curb width on a oo · ROW) from US 285 south to Orchard Road (1n Greenwood Vi11age). Signa1s to be prov1ded at Qu1ncy and Be11eview . Reco.n:une.nda t.i.on: Up-grade Qu1ncy Avenue to minor arter1a1 status and construct a new four -1ane sect ion from South Irving S treet t o U S 85 . RecCJn~m.e.ndat.ion: C onstruct new roadway and up-grade existing road~ay on Santa Fe Lane and Pecos Streets from Kenyon south to Be11evie-. Recomm.endati...on: Construct new two -1ane roadways on both si.des of the South P1att:e River . The two roadways ~i...11 serve as recreati...ona1 parkways. -- r 32x - • P roj e c t 7. Y a1e Avenue P roject 8. B roadway P ro ~ect 9 . U nion-T ufts P roject 10 . Zuni Project 11 . Floyd at Broad-ay Project 12 . Lehow Avenue Project 13. One way Streets P r o ject 14 . Englewood Lntra-c ity Mi.nor Arterials • -3- Re.comxnendati.on: Con stru c t a new Y a1e Avenue Br~d g e across the South Platte River and cons truct a new 4 -1ane mLnor arteria1 sec tion from Federal to Broadway . Recornrnendation: Improve Broadway from Yale to Qu incy: (1) Widen the 1ink from Jefferson to Quincy to provide a uniform cross- section; (2) provide 1eft-turn 1anes and bus turnouts; (3) complete traffic signal.. ~odernization; {4) beautify Broadway in Downtown Engle- w o od from Floyd to Jefferson. Recommendation: E.l.:i..mi.nate the existing jog between U nion and Tufts at South Santa Fe by constructing a new Lntersection between Union, Tufts and Santa Fe Drive. Reco.rrunendation: Improve and designate Zuni as an intra -city minor arterial from Hampden to Evans . Reconunendation: Extend Floyd directly east from Broad - way , adjacent to the Post Office building , then transition into e xisting Floyd Avenue just west of Lincoln Street. Recomme.ndation: Rebuild and relocate Lehow Avenue approximately 300 feet to the south in order to create a safer intersection bet-een Centennial , Lehow and Broadway . R.ecorrunendation: A11 present one-way street systems in the City of Englewood should be reverted to t-o-way operation. Recommendations: Designate 1oca1-use , minor arterials in south-western Englewood . Mr . L eigh indicated t h a t the Highway Department had seen a copy of the report, but w as n on-c ommittal . H e indica ted tha~ early .i.n the study he had discussed the problem of u .s . 28 5 with Mr . C harles Shumate , Executive Director , Colorado State Highway Department. Mr . Shumate had indicated that taking u.s . 285 below grade was a feasible solution . Mr. L eig h said that he had not favored such an approach in the beginning , but , after completLng the study . it would appear that Mr. Shumate was right . While it would involve a tremendous o utlay of money , with new tunneling techniques being developed , .i.t wa s indeed the best a l ternative . In answer to a question , Mr . Leigh said that he wou1d , of course, be h appy to m eet with any group concerned about the study and the traffic problems in Englewood . • II • • T 32X - • • • -4- The minu te s of the Parks and Recreation Comm i ssion meeting of May 10 ~ 1972 , recc1ved for the record . The mi nutes of the Board of Career Service Comm i ssioners meetLng of April 20, 1972 , were received for the record. The minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commis s ion regular meetLng of April 4 , 1972 , were received for the record . The m~utes of the P lanning and Zoning Commi ss ~o n special meeting of Apri1 11 , 1972, were received for the record . The ~inancia1 report for the month of Apri1 was received for the record . The mLnutes o£ the Library Board meeting o£ May 9 , 1972 , were rece1v~d tor the record. A 1etter from the City Manager regarding a pub1ic hearing to be held o n May 23 , 1972 , to discus s alternative plans for storm drainage control in the Eng1ewood South-centra1 Basin was received for the record . C ity Manager Stan1ey H . Dia1 indicated that a m eeting wou1 d b e he 1 d at C1ayton School to discus s a1te~native p1ans for storm d rainag e contro1 in the Englew ood South - Centra1 Basin , and that 1etters inv i.ti.ng the peop le i..n t~•e area to attend had b~en sent to the people living not only in the proposed project aLea, bu t a lso to those below the proJect . In this ~ay . he s tated , aL1 persons affected by the pLoject wou1d h ave an opportunity to air their views. A memorandum from Mr . J~ Supinger , D irector of Community De vel opme n~. to Mr . Stanley 11. Dial , City Manager , r eporting on his attendance at the ASPO National Plann1ng Conference h eld in Detroit . Michigan , Apri1 15 -20 . 1972 , was received for the record . CounciLman Dhority inqu1red of Lhe C1ty Manager wheth er the trafr1c report as presented by Mr . Leigh had recommended that Elati not be opened to through traf£1c. The Ci-ty M..anaqer reported that 1t would appear to be that way . However , he was not posit1ve as he had not h a d an opportunity to s tudy the report in depth . • C ity Manager D ial n o ted t hat when the recent h earing on t he p av 1nJ distr1ct had been he1d , some of the residents along the 3200 block of South Elati r~quested that the traf fic islands at the intersect ion of F1oyd Avenue and South Elati Street be removed. It was at his request (th e C ity Manag er "s) that the traffic Div1s1on h a d studied the pro posa1 and made the recommendation which the Counci1 was consi ering tonigh t. • : • • • • • -5- Counc11man Brown 1eft CouncL1 Chambers at 9:07 P .M. COUNCI LMAN SCHWAB MOVED, COUNCI LMAN LAY SECX>NDED ~ THAT THE PRESENT TRAFFIC I:SLAl\.I.L> AT THE INTERSECTIO OF WEST FLOYD AVENUE AND S01JrH ELATI STREET BE RETAl:NED AND THAI THE ADMINISTRATION B..E ASKED TO DETERM.INE WHETHER OR NOT THE OIRECTX:ONAL SIGNS AT THE INTERSECTXON SHOULD BE HODIFrED TO GrvE FURTHER INDICATION TO MOTORISTS THAT THROUGH TRAFFIC IS NOT PERMITTED ON ELAXI STREET . Upon the ca11 of the ro11 , the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: Ayes: Counc~1 Members Schw ab , Lay , Henning , Dhor~ty , B1essing , Senti . Nays: None kbsent: Counci.1 M ember Brow-n The Mayor dec1ared the motion c arried . Counci..l. Member Brown reentered Counci1 Chambers at 9 :08 P.M. and took his seat with Counci.1 . A memorandum from Mr. Char.l.es B. C arro11 , Director o f Uti.1i ties , to Mr . Stan1ey H . Di.a.l., City Manager . regarding the possi..b.l.e sa.l.e of the ''Boreas P as s water rights '' was received for the record. Mr. Dial. indic ated that the C ity had acquired certain water rights Ln the Boreas Pass with the intention of diverting the water from the Western to Eastern S1ope . T his had been done during the period rough1y from 1 956 to 1962. The project was no 1onger f easib1e , however , for the water did ~ot f1ow easi1y but instead soaked into the ground. Hence. the project had been abandoned. • With the Ranc h Creek water diversion project underway , the water rights over the Boreas P ass become even 1ess important . The Coors Company wou1d 1ike to purcha se these rights and hopefu1 1y divert the water back to the Western S1ope . At this point the City Manager rea1ized that the matter h ad been tab1ed at a previous meeting . COUNCI LMAN LAY M OVED , COUNC II..JNOMAN HENNING SECONDED, THAT THE POSSIBLE SALE OF THE BO REAS P ASS WAXER RIGHTS BE RAISED F.ROM THE TABLE _ U pon the cal..1 of the ro11 . the vote resul..ted a s fo11ows: Ayes : Council. Members Schwab, Lay , HennLng , Dhori.ty , Brown , Bl..essing . Senti . Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried. Mr . Dia l. stated that Coors w ou1d 1i.ke to 1 ease the rights for two years at SS .OO per acre for water diverted p1us SSOO per year. Then if the ci t izens of E ng1ewood voted to se 1 1 the water rights , Coors woul..d purchase them for S153,000 . Xf the project were unsuccessful., however. Coors w oul..d 1ike for the C ity to re~urse them for their 1 e ga1 fees p1us 6 percent . Counci.1man Schw ab sai.d that he woul..d prefer a 1ease agreement wi.th Coors on1y stating that at a 1 ater d ate ~e may wish that we had this additional. water . Mayor Senti indicated that he had seen Mr . Mark Shiver s ~ former Water Attorney for the City, and that he had state d that the purchase of these rights appeared to be the on1y bad purchase the Water Board had ever recommended . • • I' • • • -6- Counci1-oman Henning inquired of the City Manager if the City -ou1d not 1ose the rights if it fai1ed to use them. Mr. Dia1 ~dicated that this was his understanding. Counci~an Dhority said that the Ci ty shou1d investigate further to see if possLb1y the rights cou1d be used. City Manager Dia1 Lndicated that the water rights have a very nomina1 va1ue p1aced on them by the City's consu1tant, w. W. Whee1er. CounciLman Lay indicated that the Water Board had given this matter considerab1e cons:Lderation and thought and that there wou1d be no further c:au.se served by studying it any 1onger. However, he did fee1 that the Coors Company shou1d stand any 1ega1 costs i£ the project fai1ed . COUNCXLMAN DHOR.XTY MOVED ., COUNCX LMAN LAY SECONDED, THAT THE W.ATER AND SEWER BOARD CONDUC'T FURI'HER NEGOTXA.TIONS WITH THE COORS COMPANY FOR THE SALE OF THE BOREAS PASS WATER RIGHTS AND THAT THE AGREEMENT SHOULD INCLUDE A CLAUSE WHICH WOULD RE<;;!UIRE COORS TO STAND THE COSTS OF ALL LEGAL FEES JUST AS THE C::I:TY WOULD STAND THE COST OF AN ELECTION. Counci1man Schwab s aid that the va1ue of the rights are the most ~portent thing. He noted that we have been cautioned that withLn the next three to four years there is a severe drought potent~a1 in the area and that it is poss1b1e that a high water use type of J....ndustry might eventua11y 1oc:ate i.n Eng1ewood . These two factors a1one wou1d make the retention of these rights advisab1e . Upon the ca11 of the ro11 on the motion,. the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: Ayes: Counci1 Members Lay . Henn~g . Dhority . Brown,. B1easi.ng,. Senti.. Nays: Cou.nci1ma.n Schwab. Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried. BY AUTHORITY O RDINANCE NO. 18 , Series of 1972 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLES :I: AND :II,. TITLE XI. CHAPTER 11 . OF THE "69 E.M .C . ENTrrLED. ••ANIMA..LS AND FOWL .•• AND RE-ENACrrNG THE SAME WrrH AMENDMENTS. (Copied in fu11 1n the offi.cia1 Ordinance Book.) Counci1man Schwab said that he wou1d vote against the ordinance and stated that many of the hobby breeders who appeared at the 1ast Counci1 meeting were not even Eng1e - wood residents. • COUNC:I.LMAN BPOWN MOVED,. COUNC.Z.LWOMAN HENNING SECONDED. THAT ORDINANCE NO • .18. SERIES OF 1972,. BE PASSED O N FINAL READING AND PUBLISHED BY TITLE IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD SE NTINEL. Upon the ca.11 o£ the ro11. the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: Ayes: Counci1 Members Henning . Dhority. Brown; B1essing , Sent~~ Nays: C ounci.1 Members Schwab, Lay. Absent: None T he Mayor dec1ared the mot~on carr~ed . • • • r 32x • • • -7- BY: AtrrHORJ:TY ORDINANCE NO . 19~ SERIES OF 1972 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO , FOR PAVING DISTRICT NO . 21; PRESCRIBING THE FORM OF THE BONDS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE BONDS AND TKE INTEREST THEREON. (Copied ~n £u11 ~n the officiaL Ordinance Book.) COUNCII..MAN SCHWAB MOVED, COUNCILMAN DHORITY SECONDED, THAT ORDINANCE NO . 19,. SE RIES O F 1972 ,. BE PASSED ON FINAL READING AND PUBLISHED BY TITLE rN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD SENTINEL . Upon the ca11 of the ro11,. the vote resuLted as fo11ows: Aye s : CounciL Members Schwab, Lay ,. HennLnq,. Dhority . Brown ,. B1essing,. Senti . Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried. Introduced as a Bi11 by Counci~ Lay, and read 1n fu11 ,. A BILL FOR AN ORDX:NAr«:E AMENDING CHA.P'TER 9 , TrrL£ III OF THE "69 E .M.C ." THE ''UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE • '' 1.970 EDITION ~ B¥ CONFORMING SAID ''UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE'' WITH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URB.Al'<l DEVELOPMENT- COUNC:I:LMAN LAY MOVED ,. COUNCI LMAN SCHWAB SECONDED . THAT THE BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE BE PASSED ON FIRST READING AND PUBLX.SHED IN FULL IN THE ENGLEWOOD HERALD SENTINEL . Upon the ca11 of the ro11; the vote resu1ted as fo11ows: Ayes: C ouncil. Members Schwab; Lay ~ Hennin q ~ Uhori ty,. Brown ~ B1cssing ~ Sent1 . Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor decl.ared the mot~on carried. C1ty Manager Dia1 d1scussed a proposed b111 for an ordinance whLch wou1d grant a permit to the Atchison~ Topeka and Santa Fe Rai1road to construct and maintain a rai1 s pur across Windermere at a point approx~tel.y 300 feet north of Stanford Avenue. He noted that a Mr. Jeff Armstrong owned the property and was bu11d1nq a warehouse for the FLbersheen Manufactur1ng Company and that they des1red the spur for rail. access to the warehouse. Counci1man Schwab said that he was not in favor of cooperatLng w1th the rail.- road on this project because the rai1road had refused to cooperate with th City in real.1gninq Tufts Avenue . C ounci1man Lay stated that a rail. spur was essentia1 to warehous~ng . C ounci1woman He nnLng asked 1£ chis permit w ou1d be revokab1e and he City Manager stated that it wou1d not . : • • r 32x - - - -B- ~he C1ty Manaqer 1nd~cated that because there wa s some doubt on the part of 1:.hc l...ouncil a s to -he her such a spur . ..,as necessary, perhaps .1.t woul.d ~:i.ke Mr. ArmStrong to appear before th Counc.1.1 to make h.1.s own presentation. Counc:i.~ Ohor:i.ty said ha because W Lnd~rmere nad been proposed for ma ~or upqrad:i.ng he was ~i~:i.a11 y aq~in st granting this permi~- COUNC'l:LM.l\N OHORrrY MOVED, COUNCJ:LMAN BLESSING SECONDED , THAT THE PROPOSED BILL FOR AN O RDINANC E BE TABLED u·NTIL TH E NEXT MEETING OF THE COUNC 1L. Upon the c a l.1 of the ro11 , the vote resul.ted &S fo11ows: Ayes: Council. Memb rs Schw ab , Henning, Dhor:i.ty , Brown, B1ess:i.nq , Sen :i.. Nays: council. Member Lay . Absent: None Th e Mayor decl.ared the mot.1.on c arr.1.ed. - RESOLUTION NO. 26, SERIES OF 1972 RESOLt.rriON APPROVING AND PROVIDX.NG FOR THE EXECUTION OF A PROPOSED CONTRACT FOR G RANI' TO .ACQUIRE .AND/O R DEVELOP ·~ FOR OPEN-SPACE PURPOSES- (Cop:i.ed i.n fu11 i..n the of£i.ci...a1 Reso1uti.on Book.-) City Manager Dia1 1ndi.cated that the proposed reso~uti.on wou1d authorize the Mayor to s:i.g~ a contract wi...th the Deparoment of Housing and Urban Deve1opment. Th rough th:i.s contract the C:i.ty wou1d receive $140 ~000 or SO percent of the est~ated cost of the Greenbe1t de ve 1op~ent . Th:i.s contrac t wou1d commit the Ci.ty to deve1op the Greenbe1t as or:i.g:i.na 11y proposed and to continue to use the property as park 1 and un1e ss authorization from HUD to usc the 1and d:i.fferent1y were granted at a 1ater date . At that time the City wou1d probab1y have to rei...mburse HUD the amount of thP gra.nt . He stated that the C1.ty wou1d a1so have to acquire HUD's approva1 if they des~red to se11 the property and aga1.n the grant amount of approx~a te1 y $140 ~000 wou1d have to be ref unded t o HUD. COUNCI LMAN DHORITY MOVED. COUNCILMAN BLESS I N G SECONDED . THAT RESOLUT ION NO. 26 ~ SERIES OF 1972 ~ BE APPROVED AND ADOPTED. Upon the ca11 of the ro11 ~ the vote resu1ted £o110"WS: Ayes: Counc:i.1 Members Schw ab . Lay ~ Henni...ng . Dhor1ty . Brown . s1ess1.ng. Sen ti . Nays: None Absent: N,...,ne The Mayor dec1ared th~ mot1.on carr1ed. C:i.ty Manager 01.a1 reported that the Federa1 government had granted the C ~ty $14 ,000 for the p urchahc of a new rescue vehic~c. He noted that th~ f1rc c hief wou1d like tn neqot~ate for the purchase rather than c a11 for b1ds and that he w ou1d havP a further report for Counc11 at a 1ater date. The Manager noted that at the 1ast Counci1 meeting he sent a check-1:i.st to each Cou nc11 Member and from that 1ist ~t appeared that a quorum wou~d not b present £or the meetLng of Ju1y 3 . Counci 1 agreed to ho1d the first meeting Ln Ju1y on the 10th. • - r 32x • • • • -9- Ci.1...y Manager Dia1 pas sed out sc.ne 1.i.terature rega..rding ''Tra.nspo • 72 ~ •• a tra.ns- po r t at~on exh Lbit.i.on to be he1d in washington, D . C . He said that he wou1d 1.i.ke for the C ity to s end two or three peop1 e and s u ggested that the staff pers on be Mr . Sup.i.nger , Director of C ommunity D eve1opment. C ounci1man Schwab sa1d that a s1m.i.1ar exhLb1t~on wou1d s oon be he1d t o show a1 l ~an n e r o f park s an d recre ation e quipment and that the C ity w o u1d then be asked to perhaps s end represent~tives to that ~eeting. It appeared, he stated, 1ike it wou1d be a conf erence where there wou1d b e no rea1 benefits accruing to the City and perhaps r epresentatives from RTD sho u1d more appropriateiy attend. C ounciLman Dhority said that he had genera11y encouraged C ity personne1 to a ttend conferences hroug h o u t Lhe c o untry in an ef fo rt t o further their ~ob s ki11s ~ but fe1t that this w as not p a rt i cu 1 ar1y the t~e to send s omeone to an exhib it1 o n~ we a1ready know he s a ted wh a t we want; there is no need to s end someone to Washing ton to see some mechanica1 devices. ~n effect ~ he said , it was premature to s end s omeone~ CounciLman B1e&&1nq said that he a1so fe1t that th1s was prob&b1y not the tiJne ~ C ounc11ma.n Lay echoed Hr ~ B 1essi...ng • s corrmt.e.nts ~ C ounci1woman Henning said that it was her understanding that this was not a demonstration show or a trade s how in the traditiona1 sense . She understands ~ for exarnp1e ~ that there were four prototypes of future transportation systems actua11y in operat ion at the exposition~ Counci~an Brown stat ed that City officia1s had a1ready an a ir cushion vehic1e and that perhap s att endance at this conference was premature . Mayor Senti said he fe1t this was an i dea1 t~e to send City representatives to a transportation exhibition. City Manager Dia1 said that he wou1d be g1ad to ~ove to the nex t item . CounciLman Brown said that the LLbrary Board considered four names for the appoi..ntment to the vacancy on the Boa._cd and that they were genera11y agreed that Mrs . Lois Liq htha11 , 4460 South Fox Street, Eng1owood, shou1d be appointed . C OUNCILMAN BFI:IO\folN MOVED , C OUNC:I:LMAN SCHWAB S ECONDED ~ THAT M.RS~ LDIS LIG HTHALL ., 4460 SOt.rrH FOX STREET , ENGLEWCX>D , BE APPOINTED TO THE LIBRARY' BOARD FOR A TERM E NDING F EBRU ARY 1 ., 1975. Upon the ca11 of the ro11 ~ the vote resu1ted as £o 1 1ows: Aye s 1 C ounci1 Members Schwab , Lay~ Henning . Dhority ~ B rown ~ B1cssing . Senti. Nays: None Abs ent: r-;;one The Mayor d e c1ared the motio n car r 1ed~ COUNCI LMAN D H ORITY MO VED ~ COUNCILMAN LAY SEC ONDED, THAT' MR . ROGER D. KN'I GHT~ 5030 SOtJrH I C A D RIV E ~ ENCi LEWCX>D, BE APPOIN'rED TO FILL THE VACANCY O N THE WAT E R AND SEWER BOARD FOR A T E RM E NDING FEBRUARY 1 , 1973 . Upon -the ca1 1 of the ro11 , the vote resu1ted as f o11ows : Aye s : C ounci1 Members Schwab ~ Lay ~ Henning . Dhority , Brown , BLessin g ~ S e nti. Nay s : Non e Absent: None T he Mayor dec1aced the motion carried . • • • r 32x - - - - - -.1.0- ~ity Manager D~a1 redd a 1etter . wh~ch 1s made a part of C1 erk•s officia1 r~cord~ by r eference here o . from Mr . M. M. S~ers regarding the pet1t1on urgLng Counci1 to pass an ordinance wn1ch would prohLb1t the showLng of X-rated movies within the Cj y. CounciLman Lay s aid that he wanted to be certa1n that the ordinance which wou1d prohibit rash conta1ners from beinq placed in a11eys be proper1y e~p1a1ned ~ the public. HP said that the containers had been p1aced 1n ~he right-o£-way Cor so 1ong ~hat the pPople ar~ not sur~ what is theirs as oppose~ to CLty pr o~rty and a~~ed that the adm~n~stration assist those persons in doubt wh~n asked. The City Manager aq sured him tha it would. Counc11worma..n llenn..._ rq a~;oked the C.1.ty M.a.naqcr Jo..f 1.t "Were possible or the C.1.ty to adv1se peop1e that comp1a1nts had been rece1ved abouc the1r dogs bark1ng. Ci ty Manager Dia1 Lndica ed that he Po1Lce Department cou1d adv1se such persona . C ounci1 1nforma11y decided to ho1d a J01nt meeting with Lhe Core Area C ommittee on May 30. C1 ty Manager D1a1 Lndicated that he wou1d do some further checkLng to see if a meeting on tha date wou1d be possib1e . COUNCI LMAN SCHWAB MOVED . COUNCILMAN LAY SECONDED r THAT THE MEETX.NG BE ADJOURISIED. Upon the ca11 of the ro11 , the vote resu1tod as fo11ows; Ayes: Counc11 Members Schwab , Lay . Henning . Dhor1ty . Brown . B1essing , Senti . Nays: None Absent: None The Mayor dec1ared the motion carried, and the meeting adJourned at 10 :24 P.M. • -- r 32xl • • - • (FOR ENGLEWOOD) RESOLU TION NO. (FOR LITTLETON) RESOLUTION NO. 29 SERIES OF 1972 SERIES OF 1972 RESOLUTION FOR COOPERATION BETWEEN THE GITIES OF ENGLEWOOD AND LITTLETON FOR DEALING W'ITH A COMMON SEWAGE TREATMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Cities of Englewood and Littleton have experienced con- siderable g:r<>W'th and,. tb.eref"ore, the need for expa.nsion to their sewage treatment plants has arisen; and WHEREA.S, 'the two cities have long recognized thi.s conti.n.u.ing problem and have attempted to arrive at a solution tb.rOl.Lgh com.n:lisstoni.Dg studies of" thei.r individual systems; and WHEREAS, the I>e:nver Regional Council of GoveX"''1.XD-ents has also studied the probleTn of sewage t:reat:Ine.nt in the South r>enver met:ro·polita.n area and has encouraged cooperation a.moo.g the various cities and sewage dta·trfcts; and W~REAS,. on May 23, 1972,. the City Cou:n..cile o£ E:nglev.rood and Litt1eton met in an informal session to discuss their common concerns on the matter of sewage treatment; and WHEREAS. it is corrunonly believed that the t:W'O cit'ies could effect. large economies tbrougb a joint effort; and WHEREAS. Englewood is in the process o£ acquiring the necessary land to provlde (or a large trea.tlnent facility; and WHEREAS. it was the c011Sensus of all persons present at. the May 23 m_eet:lng th.at. a joint operation might be the most beneficial to th e citizens o:£ both cities as well a..s those living outside the boundaries of Littleton and Englewood who are within the drainage systenl. currently served by both plants; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that. both Englewood and Litt.le·ton will continue to operate their own plant.& and that Littleton will i.mmedlately begt_n to plan a trunk sewer connectloo to the Engle"'ood. sewer system which wt.11 allo"' a byp.a.ss of the Littleton plant at such time a..s said faciUty h.a..s reached its r:na.xi.In\U:D capacity o£ approx:l.rnat.ely 5. 5 mlllioo gallons per day; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED. that simultaneously wi.'th. the pla.nni.ng o:f a trunk sewer extension the two cities wUl begin to engineer the necessary additional sewage plant capaci ty which both con:ununities wUl require in the near future with such additional plant to be built at the Englewood sewage treatment site; and BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED. that a joint co:n::unittee coxn.posed o.frepre- sent.a..Uves O"f both cities be appointed to develop the method and structure o:f operations. said corn.m_ittee to work toward eHect.in.g a plan to lJ:nplexn.ent tbls concept. ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 5th day o:f __ ___,J,_,un,.· ,.e,._ ______ _ 1972 • MAYOR. City ol. Englew-ood ex officio City Cle ~ ATTEST, _0C' r /./? ~...&------- City Clerk • \ ! ~ • • T 32xl • • • • Rio.SOLUTION ·\0. 26 SER IES OF 1~72 RESOL UT !Oi~ FOR COOPERATION BETWEEN THE CITIES OF ENGLEWOOD AND LITTLETON FOR DEALING WITH A COI"MMN SEWAGE TREATMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Cities of Englewood and Littleton have experienced con- siderable growth and. therefo r e, t he ne ed for e xpansion to their sewage treat- ment plants has arisen; and WHEREAS, the two cities have long recognized this continuing problem and have attempted to arrive at a solution through commissioning studies of their individual systems; and WHEREAS. the Denver Regional Council of Governments has also studied the problem of sewage treatment in the South Denver metropolitan area dnd has encouraged cooperation among the v a r ious cities and sewage districts; and WHEREAS. on M~ 23. 1972. the City Councils of Eng l ewood and Littleton met in an infor mal session to discuss their common concerns on the matter of sewage t reatmen t; and WHEREAS 9 4 t is commonly believed t hat the two c i ties could eff ect la rge eco n omies through a joint e ffort; a nd WHEREAS 9 E n g lewood is in the process of acquiring the ne cessa ry land to provide for a large treatment facility; and WHEREAS 9 it was the consensus of all persons present at the May 23 meeting that a j oint operation might be the most beneficial to the citizens of both cities as well as those living outside the boundaries of Littleton and Engle- wood who are within the drainage system currently served by both plants; rmw. T HERE FORE. BE IT RESOLVED. that both Englewood and Littleton will continue to operate their own plants and that Littleton will immediately begin to plan a trunk sewer connection to the Englewood sewer system which will allow a b yp ass o f the Littleton plant at such time as said facility has reached its maximum cap acity of approximately 5_5 mil l i on gallons per day; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVE0 9 that a joint committee cowposed of represen~a tives of both cities be appointed to develop the method and structure of operations 9 said committee to work toward effecting a plan to implement this concept; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED 9 that upon acceptance of the plan by both entities 9 the two cities will begin to engineer the necessary additi on al sewa g e plant capa- city which both communities will require in the near future with such addition a l plant to be built at the Englewood sewage treatment site_ ADOPTED A ND APPROVED this ATTEST : ex off1c1o C1ty Clerk ATTEST : ex offic1o C1ty Clerk ------------day of ----------------------------• 1972. City of Englewood PRESIDENT OF COUNCIL City of Littleton • • I' • ·- 0 - • 0 • • Th~s copy received fro~ Litt1eton. • "//J.r , (J--«/1.._ ~-...:?.7 4 ___,___ / • • rr. ~C. ~, r ~ -.5, / l' 7-< / /. (. ,:_L .--(_ __,..-"7 .,d C//-<L • • ROLL CALL f Schwab La Counci1woman RennLn Dhor ity Br""""' B1ess:i..n Ma or Senti L>, • • .. - OFFICI A~ CJTV COUNCIL DOCUMENT A E"T"tt~.._. "T"("") ..JUN 5 72 COUNCIL MEETING FILE ~ OF ENGLEWOOD. c:::oL.Q.. / • • - • • • ROLL CALL Schwab Lav r :it Bro.m B1ess:Ln Ma or Sent i.. • • - • • • r 32xl - /- /r • • ROLL CALL Schwab La CouncL1worna...n Hen.ni..n Dhor i.t Br"""" B1essi..ng M.a. or Senti • 0 - E . r 32x • • ROLL CALL Schwab La Counci1woman Henning Dhori.t Brown B1.essi..n0 Ma or Senti • 0 -< -. II . ~ . . . :. T 32 X • - - ROLL CALL S c hwab La _ Cou.nc.i.l.wom.a..n Henn1..fl - -J - - • - .... • • -- . . - T 32X • - ROLL CALL Schwab ~~unc~1woman Hennina Dhor.i.t BroW"n B1essi..n Mayor Senti - • - - - ROLL CALL Schwab Lay C oun c 1 1 wo~an HennL~_ Ohor i.ty Bro..m B1ess:Lng Ma or Senti. - 0 - ~ 75 ~r-r . ~~-~~ <::?~~ -,~~~~=~~ r-. ~--~~ -~ ~ ... 7 • --=-r ~ _E / -• ·- -• • - - ROLL CALL Schwab La . Cou.nci.1 _om.an. Henn1..n Dh o r::~..t Brown B1eSS:J.....n Ma or S<!.nti. • 0 - • • • T 32X • • • ROLL CALL Schwab La Counc i.1woma..n Hen.ni...n • • - • •; • - - - - Schwab La Counci.1wom.an He.nn:Ln. Dhor i.t Bro-.n B1essi...n Ma or Senti.. - 0 - ' . \ ! '!" --- I' 32 X I - - ROLL CALL Schwab La Cou.ncJ..1 w oman Hen..ni...n Dhorit Brown B~cssi...n Mayor Se.nti. • : 0 - • •, \ ! '32 x l - • • //~ • ROLL CALL S c hwab ~~c .1.1woma..n He.ru:~ i...nq Dh.or :a.t Brown B1essi...n Mavor Senti • 0 - • \ ! "! • • T 32X • • ROLL CALL SchW"ab La Counci~-oman HennLn Dhor i.t Bra--n B.l.e.ssi...ng M.a_y5>r Senti • : 0 - - • - 0 - q/. 0 " ROLL CALL ~~. ~~~Sch~wab ~ Lay Counci.1woma.n He.n.n i.ng Dhor1..t Bra><n B1essi.n Ma o r Se.nt1. OFFICIAL C rTV COUNCI L DOCUMENT c;>r-•·.,.~· "T O CC>U"' I L MEETIN G FILE ~ OF': ENGL£-000. COLA. ~~ ~ 6-c.Jgef /0 -•, /'32X - - - ROLL CALL Cou.nc i l.woma.n He..n.ni..nq Dhor i.t Brown Bl.essL.n Ma or Senti .:.. - 0 -. -- -• ' . • • ROLL CALL Schwab La Counci 1"WOma.n He.n.ni...n Dh.or1.t Brown Bl..essi..nQ Ha.vor Senti. I' ·.'z; -/ :/ / ~, .,_,.. .. -- ~~ I-f ..-- ~-c ,......., ?~--~ • • - • • ROLL CALL Sch-Ab La Cou.nc i.l..woma.n Henni....J:!g__ Dhor :~.~ Br"'""' B1easi...n___s_ Ma or Sent i. • ·-:. 0 - /? - • • - ROLL CALL Schwab La Counc i 1wo.ma..n He..n.n i..n Dhor i.t Brow-n B1essing Mayor Senti ..:.. • 0 - • '. r "r • • - • • ROLL CA..LL Schwab Lay Co un c ~1woman HennLne% or i.t Br o~ B1essi.n M.a or Sent i. • 0 - -. • • • • ROLL CALL Schwab La Counc i 1woman Rennin Ohor i.t B:ro~ B1ess:i.n Ma or Sent i. • • - -· • \ ! ~ • : • r 32X - - 1- - - - ROLL CALL Schwab La man Henni..n. C ounc i.1wo Oh.or 1.t BrO'Wn B1essi..n _ ~or Sent 1. - 0 - _j j -- • T 32X • LL CALL Schwab ~unc 11wo:m.a.n Henil i..ncr Dhor 1-t"V Brown B1ess.L.n Mayor Senti. • 0 -. -- \ ! ~ -. : • r 32x - - - - ROLL CALL Sch-ab La Counc ~1woman Rennin Dhorit Brown B1essi.ncr Ma or Senti - • - (A c4/ ,£ L ~J ~ /~._/> / ... ..;r___ ~ ~ 7 ,~~~ _:__~ • : • • \ ! =r r 32x • • ROLL CALL Schwab La Counci.l..woma..n He..n.ni....n Dhor i.t Brow-n Bl..ess:i.ng Mayor Senti. • 0 - -/--~6~-~ ~ (__./ (_ ~~ (/:::;; :5 czo # 3' L/ 8"j. z_ "'7 __) ~~ ~-'Y~-1 . ? /~_ ~ 'Y~ . .,./ /('/~,~" ~ ~~/~ . I;; (_ L~ ~~ 1~- ' . • II . •, T 32X ~!- / / /~ • // .,.,-... - • -- ROLL CALL S c hwab L a Counc::i.1woman Henn Lnq Dhor i.t Bro..m B1e ssi....n Mavor Sent i. 0 ,. - ? \ I ~ -. • ,32X • • -- • 0 - ROLL CALL Schwab La Cou.nci1woman Henning Dhor i.t Brow-n B1essi..iiQ ~ ~J ' .-fl_ /~ z /~~r:- / ~_;) -T~ .---7 $Oc:> ~ / ~6'0 ~ ~~ • •, - J ~ /_,.. ROLL CALL Schwab Lay Counc ~1woman Henning Dho.r i t Br~ B1es.sin Mayor Sent i. .~ £ ~ -r-~ ~ .-L-e:-~ ~~ ~ 2-b - : 0 - 2 7 h~ ~ ,r 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ -- • : • -. -- - ROLL CALL ~ ~ S chwab Lay Counc~1woman HennLng ~ Dh.or i.t Brown • • - - • ROLL CALL Schwab La !.-Counc i.1W"o.ma.n He.n.n.Ln Dhor .i.ty Brown B1essi...ng • • •• - • • 7 ~/ ( _) ROLL CALL Schwab La Cou.n c .i.1-o-rna.n Hen..n. i...n_g_ Dho r i.~ Br"'""' B1ess::Ln....2. M.a. or Senti • • - ~~~-~-~ ~ ~£?-" ~~ --0 • - /~--~--~7 • • - - --/ - - ROLL CALL Schwab Lay Cou.nc i.1worna..n. He.n.n:Ln Dhor i...t Brown. Bl.essLn Ma. or Sent i. - -- ~ -~(/--# ~~ ~ ~~ $/ '. I ~ - : - r 32xl • • • • - ROLL CALL .--------------~ ' Sch-ab Lay ~ Counc i l."WOm.a.n He.nn i..ng Dhor i t Bra><n Bl.ess~ .. • ze 2-7 ', I ,. -. • r 32x - • 7' b • ROLL CALL -----.... Schwab La Counc11woman BennLn.a Dhori..t:. Brown B1essi...ng Ma or Senti • • - \ ~ II • • r 32x - - • • • ROLL CALL Sch-ab La Counc i ~woman HennLn Oh.or i.t Brown B1essi..n.Q M.a. or Senti. • 0 - • .I • - - r • • • ROLL CALL Schwab La Counc i 1 wo.ma.n He..n.n :i.n Dho:r i.t Bra-n B1ess.i....n.g Mayor Sent i. ., . • ·-: 0 - • • • . , r 32x - - - - ROLL CALL _... Schwab La Cou.nc i 1wom.a..n. He.n.ni..n Dhorit Bro.on Bl.essi...ng Mayor Senti - 0 ,. - =----~ -~ C-~----~~ ~~ • \ ! ~ : -- r 32x - • • ROLL CALL Schwab La Counc i.l..woma.n He.n.nLn Dhori.t Brown Bl..essi....ng Mayor Senti. • : • .. -. -- • • - .___.-- - - Schwab La Counc i..1woma.n Dhori.ty 7 Brown B1ess:i.n Ma. or Senti. ,.. - -- Henni..n. -- r 32x • • ROLL CALL Sch-ab La Counc ~1woman HennLng Dhori.tv Brown B1essi.n Ma or Senti. • • - • • - - ROLL CALL La Counc i.1-oma.n He..n..ni..n Dhor i.t Brooon B1essi.n M.a or Senti. - • - • -- - ROLL CALL Schwab :;~:nc i.l..-aman He.n..ni...nc:r Dhor i tV Bra-n Bl..essi...n Ma or Senti. ~ ... ~A-S'~ ~ T -6- P ~ ~·......._..__......c- /// -~ ~ _........_____..~ - 0 - -- - : 0 - - ROLL CALL Schwab La Counc i.l..woma.n He.n.ni....n Dhor i.ty ----;;;;;;' Brown / B1ess:Ln Ma or Sent i - --- r , > ·------- • -/ • ROLL CALL Schwab Lay Counc i 1-oman HennLn Dhor .i..t Brown B1essi...n Ma or Senti. • : • - • • • • ROLL CALL Schwab La Counc i.l."WOma.n He..nni....n Dhori.t Brown .,...,... Bl.essi.n ,.. M.a or Sent i. • • - • • I' 32X I • • • • - ROLL CALL \'~~~~~~~/~-~~~~~::~~~1~~~w~o~~~H ~enn~~~n~q ~~:-~~~~~ Dhor i.ty Brown B1essi..n Ma or senti. :Z rzve' ) / / ..._.___.,........,.. • • • • '32x --: 0 - - -Sch_.a.b .,.... Lav / Counc i 1-oman HennLng Dhor ity .,.,. Brown B1essi...n M.a or Senti. - ---- - • • • • • - ROLL CALL ~ Schwab La ...- Cou.nc i..l.wcuna.n He..n.ni...ng Dhor i.t Br"""" B.l.essi...n Mayor Senti. • \ "f • : 0 - - ROLL CALL S ch"""a.b La Cou.nc i.1wom.a..n He.n.ni..nO Dhor it Bro"Wn B1essi..ng Mayor Sent i.. - 0 •• - -- C~~~-~--------------7··----~----------~·~f---~-----~---------------~-!--~====~r_3_2 __ x~ • • - ROLL CALL Sch""'a.b La Counc i l:woma.n He.n.n i...n Dhority Bro"Wn B1ess:Lnq M.a or Senti • 0 - • • \ ! • =r • • ROLL CALL ~ ~Schwab / u ,...... LaV Cou.n.c i.1\ooirO.rna.n He.nn..Lng Dhor i.t Brown B1essi...n0 Ma.Vor Senti • : 0 - • • • \ r • • s,oo P.M. I. • ,,,,. 72 AGENDA FOR REGULAR CO CIL SESSION JUNE 5 7 1972 CO U ·... • .-FI LE C~ OF ENGL~VYOOD. c::::.c:>LO. Call to order. invocation by the Reverend Barr y Kimbrough of the Englewood Methodist. Church,. pledge of allegiance led by Pack No .. 333,. and roll call .. Minutes .. ~ (a) Regular meeting of 1\.1ay 15,. 1.972.. (Cop ies t:ra..nsmttted herewith .. ) 2. Pre-scheduled citizens and visitors .. (a) (b) (C) (d) _......- (e) (f) Recognition o£ ••special guests·· of the Col...Dl.cil .. Mr. Lowell Palmquist,. c·bairman o.f the Core .Area Study Com.mittee,. and others will be present to discuss the Committee's £ina1 report. 1\'l..r. Lou Parkinson,. Chair-man of the Workable Program Cit.izens Committee,. will prec:-~nl the Workable Program Certl£ication from lhe Department. of Housing and Urban Development. l\.'l..r .. Jeff A.rmscrong,. S 01 Eas t 13ellevi.ew Avenue., Englewood,. -.will be present. to request. a permit t..o build a railroad spur across South Windermere. (Copies of memoranda from the Olrect.or o! Com...z:nunity Development. and the Direct.or o! Public Works tra..n.s- mitted herev..-ttb. Tbls item was tabled at the meeting or May 15,. 1972.) 1\.l essrs. Jim Thomas and .Barry Lindstrom of the Englewood Jaycees will be present. to request nnanclal assistance from the City Cor the annual 4th of July Fire- works Display. J\.'l.r. l\1. '1 .. Su.m.mers,. 3140 South .Delaware St:reet. will be present to recommend construction of a swimming pool in Oarbnoutb Park. 3 .. Communications -no action requl..red .. __.--(a) l\'1inu·tes of. the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting of' May 2. 1972. (Copies transmitted herewith.) -(b) !\1inutes o:f the 'VII..t orkable Progr~ Citizen.s Com_rnittee meeting o! J\.1ay 11,. 1972. (Copies transmitted herewith.) 4. Commun.icat..ions -act.ion recommended. ._/(a) !\'lemoran.dum [rom the City Ata.n.ager to the City Council recorn.mcnding t.he purchase o! a rescue /a.mbula.c ~~ vehicle . (Copies transmitted herewith.) (b) temorandUttJ from tb e Director of Ft.nance and the ,.....-ss ist.a.nt City "'anager to t.he City 1'1.1a.na.ger recom- (C) mending acceptance o.f the bid frorra l\1obile Radio. Inc •• for the purchase of a communicat:ton.s console. (Co pies tra.nsmitted herewith.) ?-.temorandum from the Chairman or the Board or Career Service Commissioners to tbe Clty Council recom.mending that t.he pay grade for dispatchers be increased to Grade 19... (Copies of the memora.n.d.a from the Chairman and from the Assistant City Manager transmitted herew-Ith .. ) • • r 32 >< - - - A G ENDA FOR REGULAR COUNCIL SESSION JUNE s . 1972 Page 2 4.. Com.munlcat lon_s -action recommended. (Continued ) (d) (e) Memorandum fr o-m the Chalr'!Dan o£ the Board of Career Service Commissioners to the City Council recommending that the c lassification of .. Assistant City Engineer •· be c hanged to '"City Engineer. •• (Copies transmitted herewith.) Memorandum from the City 1\l.:.a.nager to the City Council review-ing the publlc meeting held on May 23 at Clayt<X:'l School for those residents in the South Central Drainage Basin. (Copies transmitted herewith.) 5 . City Attorney • .__---(a) Bill for an Ordinance amending the Uniform Plumbing Code of 1970.. (Copies transmitted herewith .. ) (b) A tt.orney's choice. 6 .. City 1\l.anager .. _.-A"l ~) Bill lor an Ordinance repealing a cert.ain section of the 1\lunicipal Code closing the Special Adjustment Fund to the General Fund and ~·ater Fund. (Copies trans- mitted bere~tb..) Resolution closing the Debris Clearance Fund to the General Fund . (Copies t:ranam\tted herewith.) Resolution increasing appropriations in tile General Fund to recognize the contribution from the County Road and Bridge Fund . (Copies transmitted h erewith.) Resolution f or cooperation between the Cities of EnglewO<XI and L i ttleton for dealing with a conu:non sewage treatment program. (Copies transmitted berewit.b.) Resolution authorizing the City to e .nter into a cont:ract with Lhe Depart:ment. of Houslng and U rban Development t.o make certain storm.drainage improvements in both !'-1orthwest and Northeast Englewood.. (Copies Lra.n.s- mitted b ere";t.h.) Letter o( L'nderst.andlng between the Englewood Employees Associa.t:ion and the City dated l\:lay 18 , 1972. (Copies transmitted h e r e with .) t,g) Request. from l\1iss Harriet Lute, Director of Libraries, to a t.t.end the American Library As sociation meeting ln. Ch i cago, Illinois, !rom June 24-28 , '972 . (b ) Request for ~Ir s .. Beverl y Simon to attend the conference of the Amer i c an Library Association to be held in Chicago, Olinois . from June 24-26. 1972 . (i) Approval of agreement between A-1 Diving. Inc ... and th e City o:f Englewood to permit: A-1 Diving. Inc •• to hold scuba diving classes at McLellan Reservoir .. -- r 32x - • • • AGENDA F OR RE GU LAR COUNCIL SESSION JUNEs. 1.972 Page 3 6... City M_anager ... (Continued) (j ) Report on the progr8..Dl. to cross-train certain City employees in fire flgbttng . (k ) 1\~ager 's choice . 7... Recogn.lti<Xl of non-scheduled cltlz.en.s a.ncl visitors. 8 .. General discussion .. (a) M.ayor's choice. (b) Cou:n.cilznan's choice. 9.. Adjournment. S TANLEY H. DIAL City Manager SHD,dfl • • • • • 0 - ••sPECl.AL CITIZEN PROGRAM I VI TEE S , June 5 , 19 (:j•F F ICt AL CITY C.OU C:lL DOCU MENT Pr cinc t !'o.o . Mr . and Mr s . Hr . and Mrs. Hr . and H r-5 . Pr ecinct No . 2 R • -.- J "72 COUNCIL r.,...E.,_-, lNG FI LE Geo r ge Gorham , 1708 We st Bat ~P'ro .¥~GLEV'IIO OD . c:.oLO- Che~ter L . Wil liams , 1990 W ~t Balt~c A enue Kenneth W . VanHout n , 329b South Zuni Street Mr . and Mr s . G~urge A. VanVleet , 2711 South Bannock Street H r . and Mrs. W illis C . Hans , 3001 South Fox Street Hr. and Mr s . John Han sen , 3081 S o u th Bannock SLreet Preci.nct 3 Hr. and Mr s . L oren A . VanHorn , 3219 South Wa s hington Street Hr. and Mr s . P . VanderHoek. 2842 South Grant Street H r . and Mr s . T hee H ei deman . 2891 South Lincoln Str£et Precinct No . 4 H r . and Mr s . Arthur VanEps. 3939 South Kalamath Street Hr. and Mrs . Larry He~mer . 4050 South Bann ock Street Hr. and Mr s . Don ald L. Hughey . 3800 South Bannock Street Precinc t No . 5 Hr . and Mr s . Le s lie B. Harper . 3267 South Pear l Street Hr. and Mr s . Stan1ey Hartman . 3007 South P enn s ylva nia Street Hr . and Mr s . Bruce C . H o r s ley . 4 8 45 South Ogden Street P recinct:. 6 Hr . and Mr s . Wi llard VanDeH o f . 29 70 South Marion Street:. Mr . and Mr s . Donald H . VanOeWese . 32 ~0 South Frankl in Stre t H r . and Mr s . Gubt Wallden . 3390 South Downing S treet P r cinct: No . Mr. and Mr s . Harry T . Paul . 3 41 7 South Ra ce Street Mr . and Mr s . Jame s F. H arkins . Jr .• 2332 Ea s t Da rtmo uth Avenue Hr . and Mrs . R ober t N . Harrington . 3181 South York Street P recinct 'o . 8 H r . and Mr s . R obert M. Hu ghes , 3504 South Marion Street Hr. a n d Mr s . R o bert E . Jackson , 3300 South Wa s hington Street Mr. and Mr s . Larry Ka r1e , 3377 South C larkson Street • • - • • • 0 - Page 2 -Jun 5 , L97Z, CounciL Inv~tees Pr 9 Hr. and M r~. R obert Vanderlip , 3901 South Clarkson Stre t Hr. and Mrs. Elmer Hansell, 3859 South Grant Street Mr . and Mrs . Robert s . Ke lLy , 3825 South Grant Street Precinct 10 Hr. and Mr ~. Dale G . Harri~, 4126 South Delaware Stre~c Mr . and Mrs . Har old J. Harvey, 4210 South Lipan Street Hr. and Mr~. D an Irvin , 4282 South Galapago Street Precinct No . 11 H r . and Mr ,. Lindy c . Hanneman , Jr ., 4300 South Grant Street Hr . and Mr s . Jeff J . Hargadine, 4395 South P earl Street Hr. and Mr s . Clyde S . Harmon , 4101 South Delaware Street Prec~nct No . 12 Hr. and Mr s . James Wade , 4377 South Huron Street Mr. and Mr s . Chart s Hardin , 4620 Souch Oelawar Street Mr. and Mr s . William C. Hask~ns , 4565 South Lipan Court Precinct No . 13 Mr. and Mr s . Eddy C . John son, 3132 We st Monmouth Avenue Mr . and Mrs . Leslie L. Johnson , 5025 South Linden Dr ive Hr. and Mrs. C orge Jorgenson , 3087 Weat Grand Av e nu e Precin t LA Hr. and Mr s . D nnls R . Ha~rison , 5030 Souch Galapago St~eet Mr . and Mr s . Edwa~d G . Karlson, 4925 South Lipan Drive Mr . and Mr s . Barry E. Lindstrom, 5060 South Ca~apago Street Precinct 15 Mr. and Hr~. E . H . Pip Wale s , 4 724 ~~uth Calapago Stre t Mr . and Hr ~. Dale F. Walker, 4717 S~uth Jason Street Mr. and Mr s . MichaeL B . Harding , 4001 SouLh F ox Street Precinc.c No . 16 Hr . and Hr~. R ob rc W. VanP ~c , 4940 South Wash~ngton S~reet H r . and Mrs. Joe A Vande1, 4800 South Sherman Street Hr. and Mr s . C1yde T . Wa1k r , 45 5 South Wasington Str ec • • • • • • - I .NT£a-QFFICE MEMORANDUM Stan1ey H . Dia1 7 City Manager DATa, ~ Ke11s Waggoner. Director o ~ Pub1ic Works ~~~ Rai1 spur across Wioder~ere OFFICIAL C ITY COUNC 'L DOCUMENT R.-ooJ n>""' -...., JllN 5 "72 COUN CI~ ME ETING FILE CITY OF ENGL-EWOOD. COLO... 5-23-72 Attached is a copy o1 an aeria1 topo showing two rai1 existence within the same area as the one r e quested. spurs . to my know1 e dge. have not caused any prob1ems ~ because o1 the io~r e queot usage. spurs in Thes e probab1y The main purpose o£ tbe suggested street i~provem e ots on Windermere . in my opinion . wou1d be to provide the needed access to the industria1 area. This area is ad~acent to the rai1road .aod can be served by rai~spurs ,wbicbshou1d bo1d down the amount o1 truck tra11ic that wou1d go into the area; and tbere1ore. cou1d be beoe£icia1. We know o1 one other probabl..e request £or a rail..spur to be l..ocated north o1 Ox1ord and crossing Windermere . but cannot 1orsee any detrimental.. e11ect that these spurs woul..d have on the usage o1 Windermere as a 1oca1 street . X doubt that the spurs wou1d be used enough to tie up the tra1£ic on Windermere ~ even a£ ter the improvements. and tbe increase o1 tra1~ic brought about by the improvement: s . Our --s torm Drainage P1an .. cal..l..s :f or the instal..l..ation o:f a 30- incb pipe on Windermere .and this spur coul..d resul..t in additiona1 costs un1ess a s1eeve is insta11ed so that the storm drain can be pushed through. This Department woul..d recommend approval.. o:f the request with the provision that the grade o1 the street and the dra i nage is approved by the Engineering Division prior to insta11ation. Siocerel..y . / ' ('' ( -) /-<: (--< -----)-y----- Ke11s Waggoner Director o:f Publ..ic Works KW /~s Attachment • • - TO: FROM: SUB..IECT: • • • • • - INTIEIIl-OFFICE MEMORANDUM Stan1ey H. D~a1. City Manager OFFICIAL C ITY CC" J ~;-'• !"""-c1 1"'ENT v~' J 72 CC>U NC.1 -F>LE CtTY OF ENGL.£VVOOD. c.c:>LO. May 19. 1972 James L. Supinger. Director of Community Deve1opment Rail. Spur Across Windermere at West Stanford Avenue. The proposed rail. spur across Windermere at Stanford woul.d not. in my opinion. detrimenta11y affect the effectiveness of Windermere in its existing condition. or as proposed by the Voorhees Report . The Voorhees ReporL proposes improve- ment of Winder-m.ere as ••an al.te:rnate l.ocal. travel. route .. and to provide ••additional. north-south travel. capacity to the central. business district... We do not anticipate that a spur track woul.d binder this function. Wbil.e it is difficu1t to set standards for approva1 of spur crossings, we shou1d discourage crossings of high vo1ume streets, existing or anticipated in the future. For instance, cross~ng Santa Fe Drive is much more serious tban crossing Windermere. Since we have Industria1 zoning a1ong the main tracks we can expect more requests for spur crossings --and we see nothing wrong with this since the function of Windermere is pri.m.ari 1y to serve 1oca1 traffic ... The Department of Community Deve1opment recommends approva1 of the request for a spur crossing ... Respectfu11~~mitt~d, ~~~ ~-.,-~-- JAKES L. SUPYNGER, Director Depa.rtment of Com.:munity Deve1opment gw cc: Ke11s Waggoner, Director of Pub1ic Works • ' "!' ·- • • T 32xl - - • • • • - -· • :> "72 INTER-OFFICE MEMOR.ANDUM COUNC.t!.... ,.., L-i 1 G FILE C:ITlC OF ENGLEWOOD,.~ TO: Stanley H . D:1.a1, C:1.ty Manager DATE, May 24, 1972 Kar1 No11enberger, D:1.rec~or or F:1.nance and FROM: ~m. L . McD:1.v1tt, Ass1 stant C:1.ty Manager sua.JECT : Console Commu.n.:1cat:1.ons Control.. Equ.:1pment B:1.d 1. Sealed b:1.ds were opened May 23, 1972 ror purchase or the Conso1e Commun:1.cat.:1ons Control Equ:1.pment Cor the C:1.tys• new Po1:1.ce -F:1.re - Commun:1.ca~:1.ons Complex bu:1.1d:1.ng w:1.th the ro11ow:1.ng results: Company Techn :1.ca1 Products Eng:1.neer:1.ng Mob:1.1e Rad:1.o, Inc. Motorola, Inc. B:1.d/Per Spec:1.~:1.cat:1.ons $54.99B.oo ® 39,882.60 No B:1.d 2. TPE Co~pany and Mob:1.1e Rad:1.o, Inc. met spec:1.r:1.cat:1.ons. Motorola, Inc. took 10~ except:1.on to spec:1.r:1.cat:1.ons but rendered an a1ter- nat:1.ve b:1.d ... 3-Motorola, Inc. supp11ed a b~d o~ $48,105 .00 as an a1ternat1ve and gave ruJ1 spec1~1c~t 1 ons on suggested Motoro1a control equ1pment wh~ch M otoro1a c1a~med was super~or t o equ~pment as b~d. 4. Funds are budgeted ror th1s project 1n P.I.F. A ccount 18.11. 5. The consu1tant's (Mr. Mas on) est~te on th~s p ro3ect was $38 ,000 .00 . 6. Re commend the low b1d Kar1 No11enberger D1rector or F~nance • rrom Mob~le Rad:1.o Inc. ~or $39.882.60 be accepted. 4~~~z::: Ass~stant C1ty Manager • • • - - • • • 213-698-0085 • Nr. Ni..l...J..iam McDivitt Assistant C ity Nanager City of Eng..J..ewood • • - 3400 Sout h E..J..ati Street Eng..l.ewood, Co..J..orado 80..1...1.0 Hay 24, ..1.972 Confirming our ee..J..ephone co nversa t i o n Hay 24, ..1.972 regarding Conso..J..e Communication Cont~o..J.. Equip~enc Bid cab..J..e tra y and core dri..J....J..ing. rhe genera..J.. description in the specifications describes core dri..J....J..ing through conso..J..e room f..J..oor , cab..J..e tra y sus pended f rom cei..J..ing in room beneath and core dri..J....J..ing up again into equipment room. Our bid fi..J..es indicate that we had a..J....J..owed t he sums of $90 ... 00 for dri..l...J..ing and $35.00 for a moderate ..J..ength of ..l.adder sty..J..e cab..J..e tray. Tota..J.. sum is $..1.25 ... 00. If the bui..J..ding construct i o n schedu..J..e at the present time is sucb that this work can bese be performe d bg oehers on siee, then we most certa in~y agree that this s :ou~d be done and the price of $~25.00 shou~d be deducted from o ur tota~ bid price. Very tru~y yours, A~fred L. Lorona Vice President -Engineering .ALL.:D 213-685 -5736 .- • • • 71 4 -526-6033 '32xl - - "21 3 -698 -0088 • • 0 - Nr. Wi~~iam McDivitt Assistant City Ad~inistrator City of Eng~ewood 3400 South E~ati Street Eng~ewood, Co~orado 80~~0 Dear Mr. McDivitt: May 25, ~972 Nr. Richard Morris has informed me by te~ephone today that we have proposed two time recording stamps, Simp~ex Mode~ HA2G, and that these need not be supp~ied because the city wi~~ supp~y them. P~ease reduce our proposa~ bid price by the toea~ amount oE $528-00# which we had a~~owed for the st;:amps. We wi22 ~ake tbe required power out2et provisions at;: tbe conso2e for the city furnished stamps_ Very t:ru2y yours ., NOBILE RADIO, INC. A2fred L. Lorona Vice President-Engineering ALL:D 21 3-685-5736 • • • • 71 4 -5~6-6033 T 32xl - - - - ' COUNCIL .... foliE E. TING FILE C:JTV OF ENGL.EWOOD .. COLO. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY 2, 1972 I • C ALL TO ORDER. Chai rman Lentsch ca11ed the regu1ar meeting of the City Pl...anning and Zoning Commission to order at 8:00 P.M. Members present: Stan1ey; Lentsch; Robins ; Henning; Vobejda; B rown; Ross; Supinger, Ex-officio Members absent: Carl...son; Weist A1so present:: Assistant Director o£ Community Deve1opment Ro~an s; Pub1ic Works Director Waggoner ; Fire Chief Hami1ton; Captain Hart1ey. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES . Chairntan Lentsch stated that Minutes o'£ the Regul...ar meeting of April... 4. 1972, and of the Special... meeting of April... 11, 1972, were to be considered for approval.... Brown moved: Ross seconded: The Minutes of April... 4, 1972, and April... 11, 1972, be approved as written . The mot 1on carried . I~ I. FLOYD AVENUE -ELATI STREET Traf£1c Island In Eiat1 CASE NO. 10-728 March 21, 1972 April 4. 1972 Mr. Supinger stated that Public Works Director Waggoner has submitted scal.e drawings showing the existing intersection, and four alternate proposals for improvement of the traffic f1ow and e1imination of confusion that now exists at this intersection . Mr . Supinger reviewed the alternate pro- posals. Exhibit A shows an enl.arged is1and in E1ati Street, which would a11ow right turns onto E1ati from westbound on F1oyd Avenue, and right turns onto West F1oyd from southbound on South E1ati Street. The en1arge- ment of the is1and, as proposed in Exhibit A, would prevent traffic trave1ing north on South E1ati Street north or Floyd Avenue. The proposal. wi11, however, require additional. right-of-way from the corner properties to make this improvement. Exhibit B is a cu1 -de -sac proposal, the cu1 -d e -sac having a 40 ft. radius . Chief Clasby entered the meeting. Mr. Supioger noted that the proposal. wou1d a11ow a 1arge ••turn around .. area, but wi11 require additional right-of-way from two properties on each side of the street. Exhibit C is also a cul.-de-sac proposal, the radius of this proposa1 be1og 30 f~. AddiLiona1 right-of-way wi11 have to be obtained on the two corner properties oo E1ati Street . Exhibit D indicates the traffic island removed, and a free f1ow of traffic would be permi~ted . City At~orney Berardini entered the meeting. Mr. Supinger stated that the is1and in the center o f We st F1oyd Avenue wou1d be cut back as indicated in proposa1 D, to a11ow a b etter turning moventent. Mr. Weist entered, aod took his chair with the C ommission. • • • r 32 • • • 'r . J ..-~, tc;;r-h asked :t.f the Conunission members had questions they w :ish~d .ar':~'A • r -•d by s"ta:f :t: mem b e rs present? Mr. Lentsch asked :1.:f there was an <~t.l.nt."'$1 .. oi t:..hC" cost .Lnvo1ved in each of the proposa1s reviewed? Mr .. !:>u .1 <1gc--.z ~td1..{..d t.h a-c there have not been any appraisa1s of cost mad e at t) •·= t..Lmt.-"'... He noted th at proposal.s where additional. right-of-way woul.d be •· Q ''.l.r-.... d , owou1d , of course, be more expensive. Mr. Lentsch inquired about ~~-~ p0ss1b1i~ty of s~gnal.iz ation? Pub1:l.c Work s Director Waggoner stated lr.a t 11 4~ l tra-L:f1c c..ou nt has n o t been ta k en at this intersection to deter- .m:Ln( 1;.hP n~.:ed ..for a signa1 .. M• ~-Hc n n1ng ask~d 1 f there woul.d b e a prob1em were Al.ternate D to be ...-pf' •\.teO , noT.l.Hg t.u d:J..:f"ference in street widths, 38ft . on El.ati north o.f F~v y d, and 25 r t . on E1ati south of F1oyd . Mr. Waggoner noted that E1ati <;; "t4 t h of Fl.o d Avenue has parki ng permitted on both sides . whil.e .,.n atl.i o1 F.l.oyd venue , p&rk~ng is not permi"t:.ted on e~tbe r side b e tween Fl o-.. · A '<""'\. <t..""' a n ei t....1..ra rd Aveoue . Mr . Waggoner noted that the st r eet is O l t -.;..-t:•· • b ': t 1.h ,.'-~ woul.d s-c.i.l.l. be adequate space to acc ommodate t:he -c raffi. ..... •.t . R o b i .... .., 4.vrr.m .£nt£d that. h e :fel.-c a signal. at this intersection coul.d hars l t" t..a"l.,.,-p rob1 .m, but th a as much tra1':fic as poss i b1e shoul.d be di.s- •0Ula~ d ~~om ~o..1.ng norLh to Dartmo uth . as that street is heavi1y travel. d . n·~ ~L a Le v Lhat h~ fe1t this woul.d on1y a ggravate a situation that is al.- J .-al"1 ..r had . \...1'1 .1-~f C.l.asb~ z=.1-ated that the Po1.ice Department has recomm.ended signa1i.z.at:J..on f t ~, ~n t rsec~~on ; he pointed out that two patro1men are needed to hand1e ~h, -..·a1L;~.. a't-p ak 'times . Chief C1as by stated that his Department is ta ,or oJ r mov~ng the ::a.s1a nd in E1ati. and cutting the is1and in F1oyd bd ~k ~o ta~1l~ a~e mov e ment o£ traffic . Chief C1.asby pointed out that t ~.--c _.-c m LO :.r:::J...S ts v.ho cross F1oyd and turn right into the oncomin g tr ~tt1~ 1~ an at ~e mpt to ge~ around the isl.and in E1ati ; he stated that L :~.a 1~ d dang~rou s s1tuat1on . M..J ~-Rob ~n~ ..1H 4 U..L.l' e d about add::a.tional.. signing of the intersection . H e not ed t..n..a :~ t..b s;~..~n b'L&.T ..t.ng ··no Not Enter•• is uwa y over on one side . •• Pub1:J..c 1'\>0d k s .._.. t.or Wag-gon r noted that the •"signing is p r oper••. D iscu.ss1on t .... t LO'iiO.• <-h.L..._ ... f -1asby noted th.at motorists dodge theE1..ati is:l..and on both s1ae3 _ F~• h~£ d ::a.scussion fo11owed . !!ti.1· • H ot: 1 "t. t_ J~ s _ EL a L ~ aske d about ~he 1nteres~ 1 0 ~he F:l..oyd -E1at i ::a.nt ersec~ion? M ~ _ Hew::a.~t stated that sh e very much appreciated Mr. Ho.•h .. <.tulZ!le t. s t hat Da r tmouth was over1oaded . She agreed tba t :1..£ through L~~,~~ ~s p~r.m..Lt ted on E1ati S treet , it wi11 c ause greater prob1ems on D \.L h . ~1 .J . S •p.1.n ,.,.e r st t E:-d that. the ma tter of the F1oyd -E1at:1. is1an.d wa s brought o Lh a~L enL~o n o£ the P1anning Commission b y the City Counci1 • who had '-~···-..v~d om pl..a~nts from .res:L d ents in the a rea about the c ongestion and c on fus:1..on cause d b y this p articu1 ar intersection . These residen ts suggested t ha t the 1sl..and be removed. The P1anning Commission was requested to re- v1c w the mB~t r . and report back with reco~endation to City Council.. tt~s . H<""":J..t't: po:1..nt d out: that there is an e1ementary schoo~ in the 3100 bl..o k p.{ S011 t:.h E.l.at.~ St ree t . She stated she did not feel.. the additiona1 traffic ono\..I J.d b ~nst..Lt:Ut:E>d on E1at i Street by this scboo1 . Mrs. Hewitt again t ha 'ke d M.J . Rob1ns for b:1.s views on Dartmouth . 1.1 --G . rl . Kul..p 327-1 S . EJ..at:::L S L . -stated that he fel..t the is1and was ·~a g ood thing •• :for their neighborhood . He stated tha t i.:f the is1and were t.o h r.:!'mov e d, they wou1 d have a .. race-way u on E:l..at:i Street . Mr. Ku1 p off red the suggestion o~ c1o sing the parkway on F1oyd Av e nue. Mr . Ku1p s t.aL d tha~ if Exhibit A were to be approved. that a great deal. of r1ght-o£- wa y wou1d b e ta ken fro m the northeast corner property. H e a sked i.:f p erhaps "t-he ad.:Lus c ou1d bE" 1 e ngtbened and thus not require so much addit:1.ona1 1and ? Mr . Ku1p 1osed his presentation by asking that the intersection and traffi c ;~..sl and b ••1 ef -t: as is". -2- • r 32x • • • El..ton Bi1toft 3151 S ... E1ati.. St .. -stated he was opposed to the re.mova1 of the :l..sl..and in El..ati Street. He reminded the Commiss:l..on of the el..ementary school.. in the 3100 bl..ock o~ South El..ati. and po inted ou t that El..at.i woul..d b e the .first .. through .. street east of Santa Fe Drive... Mr .. Bil..toft stated be was in fa vor or the cul..-de-sac proposal... Mrs .. Martha Scott 3231 South El..ati.. St. -stated she bas l..i..ved at this address for 21 years. and ""has been through this from the beginn i ng .... A~s ... Scott stated th a t the original.. pl..ans presented cal..l..ed f or a green strip preventing through traffic at al..l.. streets e xcept South Fox. The pl..an was su b se quentl..y mod:l..fied. and an i..al..and was proposed at South El..ati Street . Mrs ... Scott stat ed that this pl..an was approved, and that the is1a nd does prevent through traffic through the residentia1 area. Mrs. S c ott noted that she had studied the traffic on South E1ati, and that it is .. a1most one- way traffic .. with the c ars trave1ing south on E1ati Street to reach the shopping center . Mrs. S c ott stated that th e average was one car per minute on E1 ati Street at the present time, and stated if the is1and were to b e taken out the traffic wou1d be doub1ed. Mrs. Scott stated that she fe1t t h e is1and he1ped preserve the fee1ing of a .. residentia1 neighborhood'' in the area north o ~ F1oyd, and she fe1t if the is1and were to be removed they wou1d become a part o f the ''i nter-city, so to speak ... Mrs ... Scott s tated that the residents on E1ati Street are proud of their area, and most o f them own their homes ; the residents 99 1ike it: there and want to keep it the way it is . •• Mrs. Scott thanked the Commission f or 1istening to the resi - dents on this matter . Einer Burget 3 2 34 South E1ati -stated that when the citizens of Eng1ewood voted to se11 the park~ one of the reasons a majority o f the residents north of F1oyd Avenue agreed to the sa1e was the promise of the green strip down F1oyd Av e nue so that the shopping center wou1dn•t be vi si b1e fr om the residentia1 area. and that traffic wou1d b e kept out of the resident ia1 are a. Mr . Burget stated that there is no .. Do Not Enter .. sign on the is1and at a11, and that he further fee1s the sign is misp1aced... Mr ... Burget suggested additiona1 signing to further attempts to preve nt through traffic on E1ati Street. Mr . Burget sta ted that the schoo1 in the 3100 b1oc k shou1d be considered in £his matter; he urged that the is 1and remain i n South E1ati Street, and that additiona1 signing be instituted . Homer Todd 3258 South E1ati -stated that whi1e the signs on the is1and may be "proper1y p1aced", they are not effective . He stated that the residents were ··promised that E1ati and De1aware were not to be through streets when t h e center was bu~1t••... He asked that the is1and in E1ati be retai n e d. Mr. Ku1p noted that the traffic is a prob1em at Christmas time, but that it is a c once ntrated prob1em because of the ho1idays. He stated that if the i.s 1and were to b e rem.oved • the "neighborhood wou1d ba ve the p r ob1em for the entire year . •• Mr . Todd stated that be was in sympathy w ith the Po1ice Department, but noted that a~ Christmas t~e the traffic w i11 be heavy whether the is1 and is there or not, and whether the intersection is signa1ized or not. Mr. Todd po inted to instances in downtown Denver during the bo1iday season where patro1men are required to direct the traffic, and stated that the s ame wi11 be required in Eng1ewood ... Mr. Lentsch asked that persons in the audience in opposition to remova1 o f the is1and raise their hands. E1 e ven {11) persons indicated t hey were op- posed to remova1 or the is1 and. Mr . Lentsch asked for a show o f bands o f those persons opposed to 1eaving the is1and in. No one indicated they were in opposition to 1eaving the is1and in South E1ati Street. Mrs . H en n i n g asked if South E1ati Street is designated as an arteria1 on the Ma s ter Street P1an? Mr. Supinger stated that it was not... Mrs. Henning then -3- • • r 32 • • • • asked i f Mr. S u p i nger fe1t that the remova1 of the is1and wou1d indeed make it a ma~or arteria1? Mr. Supinger stated that it wou1d; be pointed out that tra ffi c c i rcu1ation around a shopping center wi11 cause prob1ems no matter what. and that considering the advantages the shopping center has brought t o tb e City of Eng1ewood. the City must make every effort to assure convenient a cces s and egress f or the shoppers. Mr. Supinger stated that the circu1ation patterns f or traffic to the north of F1oyd are not good. and the remova1 of the i s1and wou1d improve this pattern. Discussion ~o~1owed. Mr. Waggoner commented that he regarded the proposed remova1 of the is1and as an over- a11 benefit for the City ; be stated that a signa1 won•t accomp1isb anything without the remova1 of the is1and. Mr. Waggoner f urther stated that be fe1t the prob1em was not one o£ too much tra£fic or that the intersection need e d signa1ization. but that the is1and is dangerous in the way that motorists c ircumvent it. Chief C1asby noted that tra£fic circu1ation in the area north of the Shopping Center is very poor. Chief C1asby stated that the c hange to two-way traffic on Girard Avenue on~y compounded the prob1em that existed in this area previous1y. He stated that be fe1t the vo1ume of tra f fic c ou1d be far better accommodated if the intersection of E1ati and F1oyd were to be opened to through traffic. Mr. Brown thanked Mr. Waggoner for presenting the a1ternate p1ans for the inte rsection . Mr. Brown then brought up the fact that the City Counci1 has had a tra f fic study done by Voorhees. Associates. the fina1 draft of which shou1d be avai1ab1e very short1y. Mr. Brown stated that the Study cou1d contain recommendations on this particu1ar matter. and that be fe1t the Com- mission recommendation shou1d be de1ayed unti1 the receipt of the fina1 draLt of the Traffic Study. Mr. Brown stated that he fe1t a recommendation from the Commission wi11 require a great dea1 of serious study. and that the recommendation shou1d be made regarding what is best for the City o~ Eng1ewood in its entirety . Mr . Ross asked 1 ~ the Tra~fic Study wou1d take into consideration the back- ground of the traf~1c is1and: the contract w~th the peop1e. tbe proposa1 and promise that there wou1d be no through traffic on E1ati Street. etc.? Mr. Ross stated that the ''Agreement•• appeared to him to be a serious COID- mitme nt to a group of peop1e in the area where it was obvious there wou1d be a ••gre at dea1 of traffic''. The commitment was made that there wou1d be a green s tri p a1ong F1oyd Avenue with trees and 1andscaping and no openings to a11ow through traffic except on South Fox Street. He stated that it appeare d to him that ''we are trying to over1ook the fact there is this c om.mitm.e nt ••. Mr. Ross stated that he did not r e gard contracts s.nd conunit- ments as ••something to be pushed under the tab1e when something new comes up''. He s tated that be fe1t this com.mitm.ent bas to b e a major consideration in the so1ut :i.on of this prob1e.m . Discussion fo11owed . Mr. Lentsch com- mented that he fe1t the City administration shou1d have been aw~e of the need of proper traffic circu1ation around the shopping center at the time the commitment was made. Mr. Weist stated that in v iew of discussion that has t aken p1a ce at this meeting. he did not fee1 the Commission was in a position to make a recom- mendation fo r a c hange . Weist mov e d : Vobe~da secon d e d : The P1ann ing Commission recommend to City Counci1 that th e i s1and in South E1ati Street at West F1oyd Avenue be 1ef t a s it present1y exists . M rs . Henn i n g offered tbe £o1 1 owing a.mencbllent to the motion:= ''The traffic director be direc t e d to re-sign this intersection. providing signs indicating r i ght or 1~Ct turns on1y to give further indication to mot o rists that c h rou(;:L '\.J..-1:11 1.1 ..1.<.. ..l.b n o"\.. perm:a.'t"te o o South E1ati S-creet. u ~L't ~t· 10-..•1. "l..<•l t \.0 a.:ll r .d 'liJo•a.s S ot-, OC d <J-• l•ioc..:u.s~::1.C•u Co 11o..., .. •d. Mr. Brow b.3ked what act:Lon wou1d be r a k n i.x-"l..n t:- \C •••·r-t -..•t·~ f' • 1"t i.c Study d .i d co u ta.1 n s o m e rec omm.enda.t:i.on on this in"L rboc c.;t.L o n ·:> M~. l .. et.....-c.:::><·L ='-a t..~d "t.nat h e fe1t suc h a decision wou1d be the r e spo n s:lb :t l..ity c. I <-• ·" C•u .. t ,_:J.. 1 . . .1 ·.=-. H.:=-n r.....ing po.:Ln1:e d O \.J.t tha "t.. l:he Cor .rea C omm:l...l.'-c:::t 1s • • • • • • study~ng the e~t1re do~nco~o ar a, and the 1n~r s~ and e g r e ss ~o th1s area a1so . Mrs . Henning ~urtu~r co~ented that sh e didn~t fee1 the cost o~ a few s1gns wou1d break the City Tre asury .. Mr. H.o s !::> bl..ate d ""t:.ha. t. h e fe1t whether or not there was another sL u d~ on ~b~ ma LL ~~. i ~ shou~d be re c o g n~zed that t aff:J....c patterns wi11 change over and ovc.r; l>uL, t.Ll ~ co:nu nil....me nt to "Lh~ res:Ldents living north of F1oyd Avenue was made and the area was --co ~ pro- tected .t:rom h ea vy tra£.f1c. Mr .. Ros s again ask.-=...·t:J 1..f t..he p ersons doing the traffic study and the Core Area C ommittee w re d. ...... a re of tne <..o.rrun:L"t.ment:. made between the Cit y and the residents north of FLoy d Av~n ~e~ Mr .. RoBs sl....a~ud he fe1t the Commission cou1d make a recomm.endatio ..... on the matter now . M r . Ross then ask e d ""how many times do we have to ask t.ne re-s:1dents to come 1 • to d~scuss this with the Commiss i o n . Tbe vo~e oo the motion ~o am e nd ~ s a1.L~~:;::Ci: M L.L vo to am ud c a r r~ed . The vote on the motion to reta:J..n th the motion ca ried . ~~J.and ·<.1~d was Mr ... K u1p s1:.ated that a ''Left Turn O n1y•• sign on the is1and wou1d be appreciated . .:a11ed: Mrs . S cott than k ed the Commission, and stated tbal:. i£ the m~tt ~r aga~n discussed by the Comm:J..ssion , those residents in £avo r of the :J..s1and ~u~1 u 11ke to be notified and tbey wi11 attend the m eeting . Mrs . Hewi"t.t stat d that she app:reci.ated the interest the Coro.mission has g:1.ven the peo p 1e in their opinion of the matter . Mr . Lentsch thanked the r sidents Lor coming to the meeting . 1V . AMENDMENT OF C OMPREHENSIVE ZO I G ORDI ANCE Sect:1.on 22 ... 4 11 6 CASL ~.&- Mr . Supi.nger stated that City Manager Dia1 had re ~~~td ~ l ~~~er Lrom Mr . A1an Sternberg on beha11 o~ Mr . Wayne R oberts, who wish ~s t n ·~~ J"t.~ a d r v 1eaoing es~ab1~shment in a B-2 Zone Distr1ct, the dry c 1 ~aning esLab L-~ meot to use £1a..nunab1e l.:Lqui.ds . Tbe C omprebens:J..ve Zonj_ng Or <l:~..na oce , §22 .~-~\.•L p erm.1ts ''C1ean1 ng w1th non-i.nf1aJUmab1,~ .. 1 <Pa i ng a g e nts on1y ••; §22 .,.4 -~.1 b p m~ts any use pe~n1t~ d 1n the B-1 Zon~ D,s~ i ~t (§~2 ... 4 -10) and add:J..t~o n~~ uses . Mr . S~ernberg bad s nt w~th ~i.s 1etter to Mr . D1a~. ~op ~ >C c~·o 1etters to Mr . Sternberg .from Mr . Dav::~d D . C onway. a chemist em p1oye an 011 com pany. Mr ... Conway points uut thaT ~h11e ~he S~od~ r d so1 v nt av ~~ ha v e s ome fire haz a rd. it :i.s no more ha.Ga.rC.ous th an o p ~r&.~.L.l. 11.s si.ng pa1ot app1.:Lcat~ons. serv ice s tations. etc . Mr . Conway I a..x ~her point= ou~ ~hd.'t. p erchloroethy 1 ene (non-.C1am.mab1e c1ear ... i,•.,; a ~"' nt:) presen t.s a t..o.A .i.c ha.£a d t:o operators o r adja ce t p ro p erty ow to r-, ~ .t: t:.h e 1eve1 ., [ c oncen t ra t:J..O D ex.- c ~eds the 100 ppm r a nge _ ~Ut--.1.•'""--==f• st.a ea thdL ir~ ... v e 1op~e ~, h a q d.i.s<:usse this v--..,.cr\. n~n -., t.. C h ~c:"J l 11 1 i . C ~J"I S U h t r-•a t t..he Co·mpre-hen~'1 e st:a 1..l.::i l •n• ... _ "'-l..t h n .. , ,..-,:;t r 1 Ro~.a.1 s , A ssj s t ant Director of oJJt.J:uUD1 t.y Dc...:- request ~ith represe ntativ s o£ th e F.:1..r e tr.:::o ...._t. ... -s.. ~ C'i..t:v Attorn y; .i.t is the t..: n _- Zon :J..ng OrOl..L .&..•-· l-ci "t p rmi..t "-1 e an:in~ t3or s 1u agents u&e d :1.n t l-~ Z.or_ D1st:rict . .•• r . Ra 1ph Taylor-, rep.re~eot.i.ng M • fc v b =r "Cs t.o r M r . St ~r "rt b e rg, not ~d 'l.t. Mr . R oberts was present .:~..£ the Commission wished to a s k ques~:ions of h1m . Mr. Tayl.or stated t h e property with which Mr. Roberts is c oncerned i.s 1ocat:ed i.n the 4600 b~ock o :f South Broadway . Mr. Roberts has a c1eaning estab1:J..s hment t h ere now . and wan~s ~o eo 1arge the estab1ishment . Th e Camp ehens~v e Zon~ng Ord inance 1imi.ts the use to non-f1 ammab1 e type CL~a n ing agent..s, but d v.-...·..:ii p E:.a.""'llJ L -r,1 I.ir-~ staL:J..on,;; and oth r s i..mi1a r us-=:s i.n tl.e "..t L vnf.: I:.J ::-L ..Ll ,·L . ~I L'". 'Ta y l.v e~..::.n.o:..U tt l.-l..:...a r. i•·~ CO.Dl.D.L:J..Ssi.on t.o d::1.rect t.n oc ~·..a lL t.o d•-a.t:t a1 1. a.uend.tnent to the Comprebtns :J..v e Zo L.in.g O rdi.nanc p ctn.:L t.t i.ng c:.. l·~a n1ug es tab1 i&.n.me n ts using f1a..mm.ab1e c1eani.na agents i n the B -2 Zone D ~stri.ct 7 and that s u ch amendme n t be ~avorab1y recommended to the Ci.ty Oounc ~1 • ).1 -r . Len tsch asked the City Attorne y f or his opinion on the matter? Mr . Be.L ·a.rd i.ni stated "t;;.hat he fe1t the request bad a areat dea1 o"f merit. He -5 - • • • • • pointed out th at wbi1e the Stoddard so1vent is f 1ammab1e~ it has the £1asb point of kerosene. Mr. Berardini stated that he fe 1t the C omprehensive Zoning O rdina nce should be amended . Mr. Lentsch asked what arfect such an amendment wou1d hav e on another use using substances similar to this? Mr. Berardini pointed o ut that the Fire regulations 1imi t the size of a structure to 1.500 sq. ft . £or uses 6f f1ammab 1e agents. Discussion f o11owed. Chief Hamilton stated that he fe1t the restrictions and reg u1ations contained in the Fire Code and Building C od e were v ery important. H e stated that he h ad no objections to a11owing the use o ~ f1 ammab1 e cle aning agents in the B-2 Zone District. s o 1ong as such use s were i n compliance with ••E O ccupancy•• a s set forth in the Fire Prevention C ode. Chief Ha~ilton f urther discussed some of the restrictions placed on s u ch u ses by the Fire Prevention Code and the Building Code. Chief Hamilton stated that he didn't feel allowing s u ch f1ammab1e clea n i n g a ge nts would be as hazardous a situation as a fi lling station where the tankers are unloading and cars are being serviced . Chief Hamilton pointed out that with the use of the fl ammable c leaning f luids, they wi11 be in a closed system and wi11 be ci r cu lated and recycled. Further discussion f ollowed. Mr. Robins asked that the difference between the B-1 and B -2 Zone Districts be ex pla ined . Mr . Supinger stated that the B -1 is the downtown Business District, and the B -2 was the strip commercial district. Further discussion f ollowed . Mr . Ross asked C hie f Hamilton to ex pla in perchloroethylene. Chie:f Hami1ton stated that this is a non -flammable cleaning agent that is toxic. Perch1oro- ethy1ene is not flamm able, and may be used to extinguish flames i n f act, stated C hief Hamilton. ~~. Ross asked that Chief Hamilton explain the Stoddard solvent . Chief Hamilton stated that Stoddard solvent requires more extensive e qu ipaent than perch1oroethy1ene, and is stored i n large meta1 c ontainers and pumped through pipes. The Stoddard solvent is recyc1ed after use into the storage containers .. Mr . Ross then asked how much of the Stoddard solvent would be use d on the sub.ject property? Mr. Roberts stated that 100 gallons would be used in a syste·m as sm.a11 as he has proposed. Mr. Supinger pointed out that a system using the Stoddard solvent would be limited in size by the 1,500 sq. ft. limitation placed on such operations by the Fire Prevention C od e . Mrs . Henning asked if other c ommunities had allowed the use o£ the Stoddard solvent in dry cleaning establishments? A~. Supinger stated that he had no information on the matter. Brief discussion £o11owed. Henning moved: Ross seconded : ;rbe staff be directed to draft an amendment to the Comprehen- sive Zoning Ordinance which will permit dry c1eaning establish- ments using f1a~ab1e agents in the B-2 Zone District, and set a date for Public Hearing before the Commission. The vote was ca lled: the motion carried. Mr .. Supinger s u ggested a date o f June 6th as date of the Public Hearing . V. D IRE C TOR'S CHOICE Mr .. Supinger s tated that the City has been notified that the Workable Program application has been certified with minor conditions: some minor changes will have to be made in the Plumbing Code, and this has been started. Mr. Supinger stated that the City has been notified that f unds for the Northwest Englewood Greenbelt pro.ject have been approved. -~· Supinger stated that approval of funds for the Storm Drainage system :is e xpected within a month. -6- • • • • • Mr. Sup L nger stated that May 11th has been scbedu1ed ~or a meet~ug b e tween th e Wo rkab1e Program Citizens• Comm1ttee and residents in Northwest Eng1ew <~d . Th is m ee ting wi11 be he1d i n the Scenic View Schoo1. 7~30 p.m •• and is ~or ~he ~-~rpoae o ~ exp1~in i ng the Wo rkab1e Program and w h a ~ i s proposed to the res i dents o f the Northwest Eng1ewood area. Mr . Supinger stated that City Counci1 has asked the P1anning Co~ission to meet with Them f o~ a d i nner meeting on May 15th,. at 6 :00 p.m. The 1ocation o f 1..h~ dinner m""e t'i.ng has not been determined,. b ut Com.m.i.ssion members wi.11 bP n .J ?"i f ·L ee! as soon as possi b1e . Com.miss~on members w e re urged to at1:en.d fh ·i ._ m~€""1""1 r.Z". ~r-Supin~e r d is cus s e d a 11st o~ or~anizations wb Lc h sh o u1 d b e repr~seot d d o n tbP. ::i :iE!"n C o d e Co:nun1 t tee . Mr s . He n ning asked ~f t here were a n e nv:~.. ~, - • ... ~c..~a .! group that m:::a.._gnt be re pre s e nte d . t.tr. Sup:~..n g er 1.n dica"t:.ed he •ou ld 1 ook into th i s . Mr. Weist suggested a Mr . J:::a.._m Stap1es be c ons:::a.._dered as a ·•ci..tizen .. member o f the S ign Code COJDJD.:i.ttee.. He noted th a t Mr. Sta p l.e.s designs signs . and is a resident o£ Eng1ewood. Discussion £o11o~~d. Mr. Supin er a ske d i f th e Comm is sion wanted to s et a spe cific date for a tour of the C ~ty? Mr. Lent sch suggest d t hat the tour might be de~ay e d u n- ti1 tbe rerom.mendations from the Core Are a Co-mmittee are se-nt to City C ounc11 . He ~eJt ~h3t t h e t w n cou1d L e t~ed toge ther in one tour. and he a 1so ~el L that perh aps t he repor t shou1d be gi ven to the Commission pr ior tog ~ng on t:l'l-e tour. Discussion f o11owed . The date of the tour wa s s che du1ed as June 3rd ... M•·... up:inger stated that he fe1t the ASP<> Conference :in Detroit wa s v r-v v a 1 ua b1e. and that he wou1d submit a written report at the next m e eting. VT. C OMMTSS~oN•s CHO ICE Mr . Lentsch stated that be fe1t the ASPO Conference was a v ery good c o r•- 1'"e:re nce . and he particu1ar1y fe1t the ••mobi1e workshops•• were benef1.cia1. M r .. Lentsch stated that be wou1d subm.it a written report on the Con.£ r n<.. Mr. Lentsch discussed some of the points made at the Conference: P 1 a nneC Deve1opments sh o u1d b e ••com p1ete•• ~ with 7-11 Store s a nd gao s ta t."l..ons .. a '!"d -shou1d be conv eni..ent to the residents wi't:bin the Deve1opmen.t. Mr . ;_.,:.r ."l:...:;,c-h tt :i s c u s sed the c omposistion o f a Pl.ann:ing Commission. noting t..hat th e C ""'r f r P ...,r ? s~ ... -··s S ot.."'d t hat th~ Com:.m."'ls.3"'inn m ell!be r s sboul.d be appo in t e d by _i t._ "':l".J .. ~"'-:i• ::t d tha t-per s o n s a pr.»t.ntcd s bou1 d have 1ea d e-=;h.i.p abi1ity and L iu ab~~1 ty to e va 1uate issues that co~e be fore the Commi ssio n . r .. h .--Len.t:scb ,-.ot:ed tha t th e City o£ Detroit bas a good ma .. ~y home~ ,n a ' va c an t and board ed up --M.r-Lentsch Psti..m.at e d as many a s 20%. Mr . .e nL o-!- noted that these ere ~n th e o 1 d e r area and ~he cenT r a1 sect i on. H ~ sta1:~· d that D cr.ro:J..t has no O r d inan es fo r ::J...UE,. p O L.o rt.v owner s to raze -~~1 ~pL C~~ed b ui1dings . M rs . Stan ~e y ask e d ~f the se bu11d ~ ~s bad be n co ~d~m n e d ~ --Lents h sta Le d not ne c ess a r~1y: in anv cases the r ~s 1 d€c b:,;..i ·111 :!?t: m o ved o u~... Mr. Robins asked if the prop r t.y owne rs continued t <" ' ... a xes o n thE"s s r uc t:lJr s? M .r . L e ntsch s.,...ated -chat 'thE-y ci v . Hlf.: sot C th e ~ oL.a was t1 t"\ospi.ta 1. •tlat n a..:; be ~~ a bandoned --~t h as :JuSt bee n 1ef"t: .. ....... • --~••o...d tt.-.~r a~s -u~s\;u ;,. c:t. ..... ..,:_:-o t ·~!'" o r 3·-~tc!n .::. a~ oi?-re c on s io v.~.-~u. ar h~· Cnn ~e ren c~. I t ~aa ~o Led that suc h a sy s t e m ~~ou •d ba a high y are nuar a ~hop p i n g cencar and oowntown a rea . Mrs . Henning ga v e a report on a Community Center f or the City o ~ E ng 1 e ~v od ... She ~n.,-~d t~a t the StudeLt G overnment students had ta ken this matter a s T h ~i , Sl tbj ....,.:t :f e r t heir C ouncil. m ee-r..:...o.~. Mrs .. Henni -g state d th a t the st:•.ch n.,...~ re!=--ar c hed t:he snatt..e r on the ba s.i.s o f remoae1i..n.g -t.h c oo1 i c..•e/f ire st.-.L...L-L.. on Wt:s-.:: Gi.ra.:a:d. v~. o n s t.r..J.c ti.on of a new b~i1 d...L ng • .!!rs ... .n.~ ~...1... ~ noterl that the basic remod e1ing was est~ated between $50 .000 and $7o.oo o ; tbis bui1ding wou1d accommodate 50 -60 persona at one t1me. The upkee p a d main~enance o~ the bu~1ding wou1d be $5.700 per year. Mrs. Henn~ng ~~ated that th e estimate or construct~ng a new bu~1d~ng w~tb gya ~-c~11t~e• was p1ac e d at ssoo.ooo. Mrs . Henn i ng stated that tbe standards are o n e c ommun~ty bui1ding ~or each 20.000 to 25.000 popu1ation; Eng1ewood shou1d have a t 1eaat o ne comaunity bui1ding. Mra .. Henninc po~nted out that the st uden~s a1so consid ered the poasibi1ity o~ using the Duncan Scboo1 Bui1d 1ng. -7 - 0 , • • • which is soon to be abandoned, and the echoo1 bui1ding at Mi11er Fie1d. Dis- cussion fo11owed. Mrs. Henni ng stated that the students had decided . at their Council.. meeting, to re~ode1 the fire/po1ice station ror the comm~nity c enter, to be used during the day for recreation purposes, and used for youth act i vities in the evening. Mrs. Henning stated that the students :r el..t that this program ehou1d be given a ••trial.. run ••. and no great expendi- ture of funds sbou1d be made unti1 it is determined whether the program is a success. Mrs. Henning stated that she fe1t the students had given a con- siderab1e amount of study to this pro~ect, and she fe1t their decisions were correct. Mrs. Henning pointed out that the Parks and Recreation De- partment ~-~ast running out o~ ~ac~1~t~ee ~or some o~ tbe~r c1asses. such as ceram~ca. etc •• and that there ~a a1so need ~or gym rac~1~t~ea. D~s cues~on ~o11owed. Mr. Brown •tated that C~ty COunc11 passed on ~1na1 read~ng the Ordinance creat~ng a P1anned Deve1opment D~atr1ct. Mr. Lentsch d1acuaaed the survey conducted by the JC•a. Mr. Weist asked bow aany peraooa were surveyed by tbe Jc•e? D~acusaion ~o11owed. It was deter..1aed that tbe Jc•• survey was given 1n percentage• rather than the actua1 number o£ peraoue contacted. Mr. Rob1na stated that the ~ina1 report o~ the Voorhees Trar~ic Study is no~ re1ea•ed. Di•cu••~on ~o11owed . Mr. Supinger stated that p1an• ~or the propoaed deve1o pment on the ~oraer KLZ S~te have been received. Tbe .. etiDC ad~ourned at 10:05 p.m • -·- • • • • • • • MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR RECOMME:KDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. DATE : May 2, 1972 SUBJECT: F1oyd Avenue/South E1ati Street Tra~fic Xs1and RECOIOIENDATION: The P1anning Ooamission recommend to City Counci1 that the is1and in Soutb E1at~ Street at West F1oyd Avenue be retained, and that the Traffic ~rector be directed to modify the directiona1 signs at tbe intersection. providing signs indicating right or 1eft turns on1y to give further indi- cation to aotorist& that through traffic is not permitted on South E1ati Street. • Respect£u11y subaitted. By Order of the City P1anning and Zoning Camaission. Recording Secretary -9- • ·- • • '32x • • ( • • 0 -.. t:"":ITY 0 F F I C I A L CO'J:!~C:I!;-• .3 ~~CU MENT COUNCIL MEETING FILE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLO . WORKABLE PROGRAM Cl.TIZENS" COMMITTEE AREA A MEET1 NG Members Present: Members Absent: Others Present..: May 11.. • 1972 Park~nson, Woods, A1~en, J. Henning, Hero, Johnston, Mosbarger, Senti, Stackhouse, Stevenson, Tourte1oL, Va1dez, Weis~, Zartman Boom , Decker, Gonza1ez, C . Henning, Hosanna, S1ater. W2111am Brokate, Ch~eC Bui1ding Inspector: James L. Supinger, Director of Community Oeve1opment; Dorothy A-Romane, AssisLanL Director o£ Commun~ty Deve1opment. The meeting oL ~he Workab1e Program Citizens· the residents o£ ~he Scenic View Area (Area I was he1d in the aud1~orium of the Scenic View and was ca11ed to order by Chairman Parkinson Conunic.tee wit.h on coded map) Elementary School at 7:35 p.m . Approx1ma~c1y 70 adult members o~ ~he ommunity were present. in addition to committee members and others. Minutes were taken by hand by an impartial secretary hired for the purpose. After introduct.ion by Chairman Parki.nson of Mayor Senti. Councilwoman Jud~th B. H enn1n g and other committee memberb and staff present. he presented •~· Supinger. who gave a brie~ explanation o£ the purpose of the meet ing and ~h con- struction of the committee . He st3te d the committee wou1d bo1d simi1ar meetings with interested representa~ives in a11 £1ve areas of concern sho n on a co1or-coded map he presented. The objec~ o~ these meetings would be to explore the views held by residents in each area toward participating in one o£ the sev ra1 HUD programs in their area. and to invite a11 1nterested parties to p t·esen 1... quest ions and/or object 1ons to these pro- gr ams. He reminded those present o£ the mutua1 c ost-sharing plan between the Federa1 Go•ernment and the City of Eng1ewood in creating and maintaining these special areas . _Jr. Supi.nger discussed the potentia1 advantages to community growth through fed e ra11y-assisted improvements . He recognized that there might be individual cases in wh~cb residents might 1ee1 they were be1ng placed in jeopardy. and rem1nded a11 present that only 1n defining their prob1ems cou1d the com - mittee hope to arrive at their goa1 of a workab1e p1an for the bene£i.t of the majority. • •. • I' • • • • 0 - Or. Zartman then spoke, c1ar~fy~ng that he was speak~ng as a member o£ the Workab1 e Program Citizens· Committee rather Lhan as a member of the Schoo1 Dis~rict admin~stration. He urged those present to identify their prob1ems so as to enab1e him and a11 committee members to arrive at their goal. o£ making Eng1ewood a good p1a ce to 1ive in, work in, and raise fami1ies in. Dr. Zartman agreed that possibl.y poor p1anning at the time the areas deve1oped and inadequate enforcement of ordinances were responsibl.e .for t..hese £1ve target areas now being con- sidered £or reconstruct~on, but s tressed that a good communitY need s s l.f-pol.icing and co nstant cooperation o~ a11. concerned to make it a~tract1ve enough to retain a desirab1e standing in the eyes of its c~tizens and newcomers. The Chai.rman then opened the meeting to questions and statements from the £1oor . Mr . Ernest B1iss. of 2060 West Baker Avenue. spoke 10 beha1f o£ the e1der1y. retired. fixed -inco~e group who have invested their sa v i ngs in property and cannot af~ord to be r 1ocated due ~o the ever-rising cost of 1and and deve1op- ment. He fee1s it is improper that any citizen. and in particu1ar th~s fi.nancia11y and physi ca11y 1imited group. shou1d be forced to accept arbitrary changes in 1oca1e. zoni.og. or popu1ation without hav1ng satisfactory recourse. The next spea k er, 1rs. Ce1ia M . Perry, of 2349 West Harvard Avenue. raised the qu stion o£ whether the right of eminent domain is app11cab1e in Lhis case . and read from an opinion she stated she had obt a ined from her atto rneys. Mrs. Perry contends that with proper 1oca1 enforcement of ordinances the re1ative1y few private properties which are considered objectionab1e wou1d perfor ce be proper1y maintained; that the major part o£ the area presents no threat to the greater pub1ic we1fare; and tha~ the construction of a 1arge-sca1e. 1ow-income residence area would resu1t ~n uncontro11ab1e slums which u1t~mate1y wou1d present a far greater threat to the major~ty good and contribute to deterioration rather than improvement. Due to the in£orma1~ty o£ ~he meet~ng. many of ~hose who ommenLed at var~ous po1nts ~ere not identified. Some other speakers v.•ho presented views were Mr. Stanley Rhodus of 2323 west Harvard Av e nue ; Mr. George Mason. 2000 West Adriatic Pl.ace ; Mr . Daniel Pacheco, address unknown: tr. Wi11:~..am 01sen 21.93 West I1if'1' Avenue ; 1r. Dennis Ke1.1ey. 2393 West Warren: Mrs . Maxine Stan1ey. 231.0 West Harvard Avenue: and Mrs. Amber ~osbarger. 2250 West Wesley Avenue. The major objections and problems presented from the f1oor appear to have been: A. Property owners own the~r 1ots for indi v idual. reasons. i.e. to avoid crowded urban areas. have access to 1ess crowded schools Lhan 10 a 1arge city: bui1d and deve1.op their -2- • • • T 32X - - - - 0 - homes as they were £inancia11y ab1e: attain the privacy or 1iving poss~b1e on1y by own~ng 1arger 1ots of 1and than they might abso1ute1y require to exist~ They consider it unjust to be forced to se11 these privi1eges. B. Owners and residents are paying taxes for agreed-upon im- provements such as addition a1 roads. the Scenic View E1e- mentary Schoo1, etc . They resent the intr~sio n of semi - we1fare non-taxpayers who wi11 not on1y obtain ~ree use o~ existing £aci1ities~ but require enough more because o£ their very number that the tax-paying resident wou1d be over-burdened, despite ~edera1 aid. C. C omp1a ints were raise d about the method being ~sed in appraising the properties considered for this project . It is fe1t that these methods are arbitrary. unrea1istic. and in no way approach a means o £ reaching fair compensation . (The Chair exp1ained at th;is point that each property wou1d be appraised by two certified rea1 estate appraisers. in- dependent1y o£ each other. and that a third nationa11y accredited appraisa1 authority wou1d review the recommenda- tions; thus. a fair compensation cou1d be arrived at in each case .. ) D. Severa1 peop1e stated they £e1t they were being persecuted by irregu1ar inspection procedures. They stated exorbitant d mands were being made o£ them for unnecessary improve- ments. wh11e they knew of properties in the area which were in greater need of repair but were not being inspected. E .. As i ndividua1 citizens . the concensus is that accepting federa1 aid cou1d mean 1oss of community freedom and p1ace undesirab1e restrictions on the growth of the City of Eng1c~ood . Most agreed that stronger . judicious1y p1anned 1oca1 adm~n1stration and community cooperation is desirab1e to ~edera1 1ntervention. regard1ess of ~inancia1 aid .. The C ha1r a11cd f or a show o£ hands on the fo11owing issues: A. B. c. D. E. F. Prope rty owners present: Response about 60%.. S~x persons 1ndicaLed they own property ~n the area but not reside ~n the area .. Renters pr sent: 5 ··strong1y Opposed"" to government project: 15 Re c ognition of need .for ·•some .. government aid: 6 Wou1d rezoning he1p ··some .. areas: 3 Recogni. ti.on o..f ··major .. prob1ems in the area: 4 -3- •.... ~- I I \ li -il \ -,. =r . -- r 3 2x 1! - --, • • ~ {_ • • 0 - G. Fee1ing of prob1ems being £arc e d on individua1 owners: H. Does the group here £ee1 "they want ••nothing to do with H\JD?•• A genera1 app1ause and voca1 response indicated a greement. 21 During a shor~ break for re~reshments provided by the Northwest Eng1ewood Improvement Committee, pr i nted question forms were passed among the audience for the benefit of those who were not afforded an opportunity to s p eak and those who wished pre cise c1ari£ication of issues raised . The meeting resumed at 9:40 P.M . and the written questions were considered . Tbe meet~ng was adjourn d at 10:00 p.m. - ....... Trudy He 1r:~..g e1 Recording Secretary -4- ·• I I I I \ -• • II !.. )1\11 r 32 x l • • • TO, FROM' DATE ' SUBJECT ' • 0 - All Members of the Engte ... ,·ood C ity C o uncil Stanley H. Dial. City 1\lanager May 31, 1972 RESCUE /Ali.~BULANCE PURCHASE Introd.uctioo OFFICI A~ C1'TV cou r Jr-'':--. ~c,;;>CU MEN'T' ..:t.N :> "72 COUNCIL M E ETU ..... G FIL..E c:.JT"'.t: OF.. ENGLEV¥000. C:OLO. As you know. the City baa received a grant in the amount of $14.000 from 'the State Higb\.vay Safety Program toward the purchase of a rescue/ambulance unit. The purpose o( this memorandum is to recommend ·a procedure for acquiring this unit and the source of funds to be used in making up the di.Uerence between the estimar:ed purchase price a..nd tbe St.a.t..e grant.. Recommendation It i.s recommended t:h.at we negotiate for t:he module unit and chassis and that a total of $5. 820 . 8 4 be spent from the Fire Department operating budget to supple- ment this grant of $14.000. Background Module Bodv Unit. There are apparently three ma..nu.f.accurers of these units which are mounted on truck chassis. It is recouu:n.ended that we negotiate for the purchase of this unit from The l\1.odular Ambulance Corporation in Dallas~ Tex.as~ as the other two m.anu!acturers do not meet our speci.f.ications. <>o.e of the two firms builds an odd cab to axle size which would require the chassis frame to be altered. This is undesirable. The second firm builds a unit w-hich is more costly t:h.an that manufactured by the D:::l.llas firm.. This is the case even for a unit shorter than the ooe desired .. Truck Chassis. Two chassis are recomme=a.ded. for this unit~ a Ford 390 cubic inch and a Chevrolet 400 cubic inch.. The Chevrolet is preferred for several reasons~ the most notable being that it is built two inches lower to the ground and~ there:f:ore,. requires less energy £rom the anendan~ loa.dmg pat:ien'CS in i't. • After receiving local quotations it would appear that a savi..ngs of over $200 could be obtained by acquiring this chassis from The l\1.odulance Corporation.. It would also appear that to acquire the chassis (rom Modulance would require less time for delivery as a un.lt purchased locally would {trst have to be taken to Dallas for the module to be i.n..stalled. on it • • • • • • All 1\l.er:nbers of t.be Engl ewood City Council ~'l.ay 31,. 1972 Page 2 .. Rescue Equipment-.. • 0 - The list price of: the requisit.e equipn-..ent. is approximately S3. 1 0-20.. This wouJd probably be reduced by S9 -l through the purchase of two resuscit.at.ors from the 'Doug Sovern l\lemorial Fund.. The remaining equipment. should probably be bid . Radio Equipment. In order to equip this unit "~dth the necessary radio equipment.._ including th-e opticom signal control system, t:be cost would be approximately Sl, 516.. 'Tbe radio equipment should probably be acquired through the State bidding procedure while the opticom syst.em should be negotiated in order to be compatible \.vith t.he equipment v..•e curreot.ly have moun~ on other emergency equipmenL.. l\1iscel1an.eous .. Such misceUane ous equipment as bedding and bandages would amount to about $341... No bidding procedure is advised other t..ha..n receiving i.n.form.al quotations .. E xpen.dl tu:res .. 1 .. Module Body Unit 2 . Truck Chassis 3.. Rescue Equipment Cost Summarv (Estimate) 4.. Radio Equipment (including opticom) 5 . Miscellaneous Source of Funds. 1.. Highway Safety Grant 2.. Sovern l\temorial Fund 3... Depart:YD.enta.l Operating Funds $12.278 .55 3.489 .29 3. 180.20 1.515.80 341.00 $20.804.84 $14.000.00 984.00 5.820 .84 $20.804.84 The nearly $6,000 needed from the operating budget ls available through the funds originally r eserved for the cross-training of other City personnel in flre flghting • A total of $20, 000 was reserved for this purpose, but since the progra.D'\ w-Ul not be implemented until somewhat later me full $20, 000 w-ill not be required this year .. Attached for y our information are letters from Dr .. William R. Trutt:t:. Chairman. Girard !\.1.edica.l Group., Emergency I>epartment., Swedish 1\:ledical Center., and Mr .. M01:1roe ~1. I\1.ayo., Program 1\.:t.a.n.ager., Coordinator of Highway Safety. Respectfully . --=s==-'~ ~ //-~~ ~T.!!-~~~ .. };!~ DlAL - • • - - • • • CHI£~ WILLI•M HaMILTON E"~Lcwooo reRc DePaRTMENT ENGLEWOOD, CoLOR•oo, s ol 10 • 0 - 0 MAY II, 1972 APPRECIATED THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET WITH YOU AND CHIE~ McLELLAN &NO YOUR COMMITTEE CONCERNING THE PURCHASE 0~ TOUR NEW RESC U E aMBULANCE. W&S IMPRESSED WITH THE M•TERIAL PRESENTED CONCERNING THE MooUL&~CE CNIT &NO THE INSPECTION AND TEST RIO£ IN THE DEMONSTR a TOR SUPPORTED MY FEELINGS ~OR THAT &MBUL&NCE. DoN •NO I DISCUSSED THE CH ,NCES AND SPECtrtC&TIONS OF PARTICULAR INTEREST TO TOUR TYPE 0~ SERVICE. J BELIEVE AS YOU 00 ~HAT THE MooUL&NCE UNIT IS CAPABLE or GOOD SERVICE, MEETS THE _ _.NC.CESS&RY REQU1R£M£NTS ·NO IS REASONABLE IN COST. ENDORSE YOUR CHOICE OF THIS PARTICULAR UNIT. I~ CAN BE OF SERVICE AT ANY OTHER TIME OR IN ANY OTHER WAY TO HELP YOU OBTAIN YOUR AMBULANCE PL£~5£ LET ME KNOW. IF IT IS 0~ ANY HELP ~EEL FREE TO USE MY ENDORSEMENT AS YOU SEE FIT. WRT/BH -7 _::) StNC.ERCL'f'; ~-/ // \....._/ J / ' : _. / '_;_ / ~-/ /, /_"' I (... (....-• / • ._ / .._ .,__ ~ ~ /. M....-f...L-I'AM R. TRUITT. MD CHAIRMAN• GIRARD MEDICAL GROUP EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT• SwEDISH MEDICAL CENTER • • I' 32 X I • • • - STATE OF COLORADO ... _ .. _,_ __ o- COOROINATOR OF HIGHWAY SAFETY 72e a'TATE •e.RVIC:III.& aLOG . OIII.NVII.•. COLOaA.DO ao...:lle~ c:ao:at ••.a-.ae?7 "-Y 19. 1972 Chief William A. Hamilton Englewood Fire Department 175 W. Girard Ave. Englewood. Colo. 80110 Dear Chief Hamilton: The project director is responsible for detenmin;ng that adequate procedures are emoloyed to insure detailed accountab;lity for funds expended ~or the project. Usually existing ourchasing procedures of the aoolicant agency are adeauate. oroviding it conforms to generally accepted purchasing principles. If the purchasing procedures for the City of Eng lewood oermits negotiating contracts. then this is to be an acceptable procedure. If we can be of further assistance. please contact th1s office. S1neere,y. Corde 11 Sari th Coordinator of Highw"l' Sat'et;y ~;>w.n.~ Monroe H. Mayo Program Manager ·- • • • r 32xl - - - - -- MEMORANDUM TO: S tanley H ... Dial. City f.'lanage.r FROM: Wlllla.zn L... McDivitt. Assistant Ctty Manager DATE: June 1,. 1972 OFFICIAL CrTY COU~C tL. re>e:UMENT • :> 72 COUNC..L ME.~f• G FILE CI"TY" OF ENGLEVVOOD. COL.C1. - S UBJECT, NEED FOR SALARY INCREASE FOR DISPATCHERS ()n 1\~ay 18. 1972. t::he Board o.f Career Service Com.missloners recom- mended that t.be sa1a.ry level for dispatchers be increased to Grade 19 .. Tbe purpose of' thi_s memorandum. ls to further support the recouu::nendatlon o:( the Board "";tb per1:i.nent facts and :flgu.res. Since Septeutber of 1969 ~e have had a total of fifteen dispat-chers either resign or be discharged. This represents a complete turnover once each year or. stated another 'Qo."By. a turnover rate a£ one employee every 73 days. If" 'th1s ;:>::ty gr-ade is approved. "We would expe~ our turnover rate to be cut. drastically .. The new-sa..lary level would be $54-3 ... 00 per month to 5693 .. 00 per month ... By way of comparison. Arvada begl.n.s dispatchers at $850 .. 00 per month and Denver $900. 00 per month.. <>.o. the other hand • .Arvada has a sa..la..ry range o:C $469.00 to $570. 00; Thornton $421.. 00 to $553. 00; and Littleton $845.00. It. is not unusual t.o find cities sta.Hlng tbeir dlspat.chlng centers 9.--ltb pa.trol01en or even seasoned o:fficers.. T'he present rate ln Engle~·ood for a pat:rol- zn.an :f:ou.rtb class is $598. 00 per Dl.ODth w-hile the rate for a firs-t-class patrolm.a:n la $802. 00 per month . 'W"LM.cD:d.D \ ! '!' ·- • - '32x • - C>FFICIAC CITY C:O l;t~t::I L_ DOCUMEf'ti"WW' • ::> '72 C OUNCIL ,.._,e-io ,.c; FILE C-ITY OF ENG~.EWOOD. COLO.. City of Englewood June 1 .. 1972 TO: ~s Honor the Mayor and Members of City Counci1 FROM: The Board o£ Career Service Commissioners 3400 Sout.h E ta ti St.reet Engl-ood, Color-ado 801"10 Phone (303) 761 -1 140 This is to notify you that a motion ~as made. seconded. and unan~us1y passed by the Career Service Board at its meeting of May 18, 1972, that the position of C1erk-Dispa tcber be upgraded to Grade 19 . /_/ ,A-:_7 / ~! -:_-.--~.- H. R. BRAUN .:. Cha.i.rm.an, HRB:pl.:z: Career Service Board • • T 32X • • • • • - OFFICIAL Cf'T"Y COUNCt L OOC:.UM'EN"T R'E ~ o~N T O ""·· 5 72 COUN CIL.. ""1 ~.....:.T 1NG FILE C.-=rY O F ENGLEWOOD. COLO. City of Englewood June 1, 1972 TO: FROM: His Honor the Mayor and Members of City Counci1 · 3400 South Elatl str-t Engl~. Colorado 80110 Pho~ (303) 701 -1140 The Board of Career Service Commissioners The Career Service Board at its meeting of May 18, 1972, unanimous1y passed a motion to change the tit1e of -Assistant City Engineer" to "City Engineer-(no change in sa1ary). /-//. •/h.-c..-~ . ;--' H. R. BRAUN .:;.,-r.:· Chairman, Career Service Board HRB:pl.z • • r 32x • • - • 0 - OFFI C IAL: CITY CO~~'='~...., ~C>C UME"'f'.."'" • ::> "72 COUNC I L r .. l_.._li G FlLE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COI....CL TO: All l\1embers of the Englev.·ood City Council Stanley H. Dial, City !\.'tanager May 31, 1972 REVIEW OF PUBLIC 1\tEETTNG HELD ON 1\lA ~-23 AT CLAYTON SCHOOL FOR THOSE RESIDEXTS IN THE SOUTH CENTRAL DRAINAGE BASIN For purposes of r ev1e'"'"'"' it might be h elpful to sum up the meeting which v.·a..s held at Clayton School the other evening to consider possible alternat·h·es r.o t:.be st.orm drainage problems in the South Ce:ntr::J..J Engle"•ood Basin . l\1essrs . Neil Grigg and Ton'l Young of S ellards & Grigg made a fine presenta.t.ion suppleme nted by slides n.nd o,·erl::tys. P::l..rt.icularly helpful ,.,,as a slide pres en ~ tion of the entire drainage basin. It v.·as evidently ,.vell done for there appeared to be no con.fusion on 'the part o.f t:.he audience as to ~-b:Lt. the problems in the area are. ldr . Grigg presented th e five alternat"lves for the area and discussed t:b.e pros and cons of each . FollQV~.·ing the presenC~.tion,. he fielded qu.estions £rom the audience .. 1\-fost. questions were germane and again sho·wed a good understanding of the problem by the audience . Co several occasions "'.-e tried to g e t a ··reading .. :!rom the audience as to the alternative they preferred but it "'-as generally felt it was too early for them to t:n.a.ke a commitTnent.. It 'vas agreed that those who f:elt strongly about one of the five alternatives vvould express themse lves either in writing or by calling City Hall. It seems to rne that we should not rely up<x1 the Lndivtduals in the vicinity of this project to give us a valid response as t.o their attitudes without some further e:ffort on our part.. tt would,. therefore,. be my suggestion that ''"e send out a letter enclosing a self-addressed,. st:u:nped posta..l card on "" c they could check off their preference as to alternatives and add comments .. 'This could be done w-ithin the next. thirty days or thereabouts .. In addition,. t bad a conversation 'With one of the ~ers "'~hose property \.VOu.ld be t.a.ken under several o:f the alternatives 'vho felt a..o additional meeting should be held in order to e.."Cplore in depth the land acquisition policy of the City with federal £u:n.ds and "'"itbout them.. It sc<!ms to me t:hn:t ~-e might "'-ish to consider i.n'l.•iting those o~-ner s ~ose properties will be acquired (either partly or totally ) so th..at "'"e could h ave an extensive discussion ~·-Ub them of the land acquisition policies ... May I h ave your opiniOD 01:1 these matters .. Tba..ok you .. Respectfully,. --------------~ a. 4--r----. .......:._ _£;> S TANLEYH~ -~ Cl ty Manager ~~-nn • 0 • - • 0 - OFFICI A~ C:I'TY COUNCIL DOCUMENT "'E'TU ~N T O JoJN5 72 .MA.Y 18, 1972 COU NCI L M EETI N G F I LE LETTER OF tn:~E RST~-"D1N G c.rrY OF ENGLEWC>OD. C<>LC1. B~~ REPRESENTATIVES OF T H E E .NGL E W OOD EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND CITY OFFICIALS The fo11ow.i.ng is a 1etter o£ understanding that has been conc1uded through mutual. discussions be~een members of the Eng1ewood Emp1oyees Association and City of£ic.i.a1s. We, the undersigned, agree to recommend the £o11owing to our Association and to the City Counci1. respective1y; ~-Effective Ju1y 1. 1972: We agree to a 5 % increase £or a11 non-emergency emp1oyees in the c1assified service present1y at or be1ow Grade 30- 2-It is acknow1edged that over the past severa1 years changes have occurred which now warrant review and updating of job descrip tions with possib1e cha~ges in pay 1eve1s to more near1y re£1ect the current actua1 1eve1s of responsibi1ity and work assignments-The Personne1 Department wi11 proceed between now and the end of the ca1endar year ~ith a revie~ of a11 municipa1 job descriptions and wi11 correct and update them in accordance with the City•s past procedures, inc1uding review by the Career Service Board. Any such changes reso1ved £rom this c1assification ana1ysis wi11 be p1anned for ~p1ementation on January 1, 1973. 3-It is agreed that for 1973 the City of Eng1e~ood wi11 compare its 1eve1 for sa1aries and fringe benefits as a tota1 compensation package and that a survey wi11 be made to ascertain this information_ The Cities of Denver, Aurora. Litt1eton. and Arvada wi11 be surveyed and the sa1aries for Eng1ewoc~·s emp1oyees wi11 be changed to the scun.e 1eve1 of tota1 co·mpensa'-.:ion as then bei.ng provided to emp1oyees of these ci.ti.es_ The comparison with cities in the metropo1i.tan area ~i11 be accom- p1ished as fo11ows: (a) Twe1ve key indicator jobs. as 1isted on the attaChed sheet. ~i11 be compared on the basis of actua1 work assignments and responsibi1ities_ (b) The percentage increase for a11 non-emergency. c1assified e .rnp1oyees ....,.i.11 be that percentage difference. if any, between the tota1 compensation being paid for the se1ected jobs and the average total. compensation being paid those comparab1e positions in these cities. Comparisons w.i.11 be based on the entrance wage. : • • - - - 0 - (c) If, in any of the cities surveyed, no precise1y comparab1e position exists, then the Personne1 Director ~i11 research other existing positions in that city and average the data avai1ab1e to estab1isb an equitab1e basis of comparison. 4-we recognize that it wou1d take so:me t.i..rne to i.mpl..e:ment the 1973 pay pl..an. It is agreed that we adhere to the fol..J..owing schedu..1e: (a) January 1 -January 15, 1973 --A total.. compensation survey of these four cities- (b) January 15 -February J.., 1973 --Discussion with non-emergency committee and the City ccmmittee regarding appl..ication of the increase in total.._co~pensation to various benefits. (c) February 1 -February 15. 1973 --Discussion and approval.. of the City Council.. and Association. (d) February 15, 1973 --Impl..ementat.i.on of pay p1an. (e) Survey data is to be cities as of February 15. be retroactive to January that in effect in the four 1973. but pay changes wi11 J... 1973. 5. Xt is aCknow1edged that a11 provisions in this Letter are sUbject to whatever £edera1 regu1ations ~ay app1y. 6. Xt is c1ear1y understood that this Letter o£ Understa~ding recites the fu11 extent of a11 compensation for the Eng1ewood non-eaergency emp1oyees for the year 1972-1973. S~H. D -• \ ! "r ·~ • - - • • COUNCIL-MEETING FILE Cl"TY" OF ENGL£W00D,. c::cx...D. INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN ;;;z-7 A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9. TITLE III, OF TilE '69 E_M_C_ • THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE," 1970 EDITION, BY CONFORMING SAID "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE" WITH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT_ WHEREAS, the City Council.. of the City of Eng1e~ood did by Ordi.nan.ce No. 42, Series of 1971 adopt the "Uniform Plumbing Code," 1970 Edition; and WHEREAS, the Department of Hous~g and Urban Deve1op- ment has Lndicated that financial.. amends to the Pl...umbing Code are required in order that the City woul...d be e1igib1e for HUD assistan.ce. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLE WOOD, COLORADO, as fo11o-s: Section 1. P1um..bing Code,'' 1...9 70 as fo11o-w-s: Sec_ 401(c) That Section 401(c) of the Edition, is hereby amended ''Uniforxn to read Above -Ground Piping Within Bui1dings Soil.. and ~aste pi.p~ng for a drainage system w1thin a buil...dLng sha11 be of not l...ess than se~ce weight cast iron, ga1vanized wrought iron, galvanized open hearth iron, ga1vanized stee1, stain1ess stee1 piping grade 409, Schedu1es G and H, 1ead, brass, copper pipe or of copper tube. P1astic piping bearing the markings NSF -DWV may be used on1y in one and two story dwe11ings. Section 2. That Section 317(e) of the "Uni-form P1UID.bLng Code," 1970 Edition, is hereby SDlended to read as fo11c:n;vs: Sec_ 317 Trenching. Excavation and Backfi11 (e) Water serv~ces pipes or any under- ground ~ater pipes sha11 not: be run or 1aid in the same trench with non-meta1ic bui1ding, sewer or drainage piping, except as provided in this section. -1 - • • '32xl - - - - The ~ater service pipe may be p1aced in the same trench with such bui1ding drain and bui1ding sewer, pro~ded both of the £o~1owing conditions are met: The bottom of the water service pipe, at a11 points, sha11 be at 1east twe1ve (12) inches above the top of the sewer 1ine. The water service pipe sha11 be p1aced on a so1id she1f excavated at one side of the common trench. Section 3. That Section 1008(b) of the "Uniform. P1u:mbi..ng Code,.., 1970 Edition.,. is hereby aznended to read as fo11o'W'S: Sec. 1008 Inst:a11at:ion. Inspection and Testing (b) Water service pipes or any under- ground water pipes,. sha11 not be run or 1aid in the same trench with non-met:a1ic bui..1di..ng sewer or drainage piping,. except as provided in this section. The water service pipe may be p1aced in the same trench w1th such bui1ding drain and bui1ding sewer~ provided both of the fo11o~ng conditions are met: The botto~ of the water service pipe~ at a11 points~ sha11 be at 1east twe1ve (12) inches above the top o£ the sewer 1ine. The ~ater service pipe sha11 be p1aced on a so1id she1f excavated at one side of the common trench. Section 4. That Section 1108 of the ''Uniform P1UDl.bing Code~'' 1970 Edition~ is hereby 8DJiended to read as fo11ows: Sec. 1108 Sewer and Wa.te r Pipes Non-meta1ic bui1ding sewer or drainage piping sha11 not: be run or 1aid in the same trench ~t:h water se~ce pipes or any underground water pipes un1ess both of the fo11owing require~ents are tne t:: The bottom of the water piping at a11 points sha11 be at 1east twe1ve (12) inches above the top o£ the sewer piping. -2- -- 1'32X .......... • • • The water piping sha11 rest on a so1id she1f on one side o£ the common trench. Section 5. That a11 ordinances or parts of ordinances in conf1ict herew1th are express1y repea1ed. on the of Attest: Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading day of 1972. Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the 1972. Mayor day ex officio City C1erk I, , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and comp1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of 1972. ex officio City C1erk -3- • • - • • • INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCI~~~ A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9, TITLE III, OF THE '69 E.M.C., THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE," 1970 EDITION, BY CONFORMING SAID ''UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE'' WITH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS, the City Counci1 of the City of Eng1ewood di.d by Ordi-nance No. 42, Series of 1971 adopt the "Uniform P1u:mb:l...ng Code,'' 1970 Edition; and WHEREAS, the Department of Housi..n.g and Urban Oeve1op- ment has indicated that fi.nancia1 amends to the P1~bi.ng Code are required in order that the City wou1d be e1i.gi.b1e for HUD assistance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as fo11ows: Sect:i.on. 1. That Section 401(c) of the "Uniform P1umb:Lng Code,.'' 1970 Edition. is hereby a~Dended to read as fo11ows: Sec. 401(c) Above-Ground Piping Within Bui1dings Soi.1 and was t:e piping for a drainage syst:e~ ~chin a bui1di.ng sba11 be of not: 1ess than service weight cast iron,. ga1vani.zed wrought iron, ga1va.nized open hearth iron,. ga1-van.i.zed stee1. stain1ess stee1 pipLng grade 409, Scbedu1es G and H, 1ead, brass. copper pipe or of copper tube. P1ast~c p~p~ng bearing the =ark~gs NSF-DWV =ay be used on1y in on.e and t ·wo story c::lwe ~1ings. Section 2. That Section 317(e) of the ''Uniform P1umbing Code.'' 1970 Edit:: ion, is hereby &IDe:n.ded to read as fo11ows: Sec. 317 Trenching. Excavation and Backfi11 (e) Water servi..ces pipes or any u::nder- ground water pipes sha11 not be run or 1aid in the same trench ~t::h non-meta1ic bui1d~g. sewer or drainage piping. except as provided in this section . -1- .... • • - - - - The water service pipe ~ay be p1aced Ln the same trench ~ith such bui1d1ng drain and bui1ding sewer, provided both of the fo11o~ng conditions are met: Sect:i..on 3. Pl.UD>b:l..ng Code." L970 fol.l.cn.no: Sec:. 1.008 The bottom of the water service pipe, at a11 poLnts, sha11 be at 1east twe1ve (12) inches above the top of the sewer 1Lne. The water service pipe s ha11 be p1aced on a so1id she1f excavated at one side of the common trench. TI">at Section 1.008(b) of the "Uniform Edition, is hereby amended to read as Insta11at:ion. Inspection and Testing (b) Water service pipes or any under- ground water pipes, sha11 not be run or 1aid in the same trench w1th non-meta1ic bui1di.ng sewer or drainage pipi_ng,. except as provided :Ln. t .bis sec ti.on. The water service pipe may be p1aced Ln the same trench ~th such bui1ding drain and bu~1ding sewer, provided both of the fo11awing condit~ons are met : The bottom of the ~ater service pipe. at a11 points, sha1 1 be at 1east rwe1ve (12) inches above the top o£ the sewer 1Lne. The water service pipe sha11 be p1aced on a so1id she1f excavated at one side of the common t-~nch. Section 4. "nt.a.t Section 1108 of the ''Uniform P1UIIlh:Lng Code.'' 1970 Edition., is hereby azoen.ded to read as fo l.l.ows : Sec:. 1.1.08 Sewer and Water Pipes Non-meta11..c bu1..1d~g sewer or drainage p~pLng sha11 not be run or 1aid in the same trench W'i..th water service pipes or any underground water p~pes un1ess both of the fo11owing requirements are DIIE!.t : The bottom of the water pi..p~ng at al.l. points shal.L be at Least twe1ve (L2) inches above the top of the sewer piping. -2- : -- - - - The water p1ping sha11 rest on a so1id she1f on one side of the co~on trench. Section 5. That a11 ordinances or parts of ordinances in conf1ict herewith are express1y repea1ed. on the o f Attest : In~roduced , read in fu11 and passed on first reading day o f 1 97 2. Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance o n the 1 9 72 . Ma y or day ex officio City C1erk I. • do hereby certify that the above and foregoing i s a true, accurate and co~p 1ete copy of a B i11 f o r an Ordi nance. ~traduced, read in fu 11 and _passed on fi rst re adi ng o n t h e day of 1972. ex officio ~ity C1erk -3- : • - - • • • INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN A BILL FOR AN ORDINA."'CE AMENDING CHAPTER 9. TITLE III. OF THE '69 E.M.C. • THE "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE." 1970 EDITION, BY CONFORMING SAID "UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE" WITH CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. WHEREAS~ the City Counci1 of the City of Eng1ewood did by Ordinance No . 42,. Series of 1971 adopt the "Uniform P1umbing Code,." 1970 Edition; and WHEREAS,. the Department of Housing and Urban Deve1op- ment bas indicated that: financia1 amends t::o the P1umb~ng Code are required in order that: the City wou1d be e1igib1e for HUD a.ssi.sta:n.ce. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. as fo11ows: Section 1. "Ib.at:: Section 401(c) of the ''Uniform P1umbing Code.'' 1970 Edition.,. is hereby .&~:Den.ded t:o read a..s fo11o'-7S: Sec. 401(c) Above-Ground Piping Within Bui1dings Soi1 and waste pipLng for a drainage system ~thin a bui1ding sha11 be of not 1ess than service weight: cast: iron,. ga1van.i.zed wrought: iron,. ga1van.i.zed open hearth iron,. ga1vanized st::ee1,. staLnl.ess steel. piping grade 409. Schedu1es G and H. 1ead. brass. copper pipe or of copper tube. P1astic piping bear~ng the ~rkLngs NSF-DWV ~ay be used on1y in one and two story dwe11~ngs. Section. 2. That Section 31.7(e) of the ''Uniform Pl.umbing Code.'' 1970 Editi.on., is hereby amended to read as fo1l.owrs: Sec. 317 Trenching. Excavation and Backfi11 (e) Water services pipes or any under- ground water pipes sha11 not be run or 1aid in the same trench with non-meta1ic buil.ding., sewer or drainage piping. except as provided in this section . -1- • • - • • The ~ater service pipe ~ay be p1aced in the same trench ~th such bui1ding drain and bui1ding sewer, pro~ded both of the fo11owing conditions are ~et : Section 3. P1UlDbing Code,.'' 1970 fo11o"'-7s: Sec. 1008 The bottom of the water service pipe, at a11 points,. sha11 be at 1east twe1ve (12) ~nches above the top of the sewer 1ine. The water service pipe sha11 be p1aced on a so1id she1f excavated at one side of the common trench. Til.ac Section 1008 (b) of the ''Uni.forDl Edition,. is hereby amended to read as Insta11ation, Inspection and Testing (b) Water service pipes or any under- ground ~ater pipes,. sha11 no~ be run or 1aid in the same trench ~th non-meta1i.c bui1ding sewer or drainage piping, except as provided in this section. The 'W'&t:er service pipe m_a.y be p1a.c.ed in the same trench ~th such bui1ding draLn and bu~1ding sewer. provided both of the fo11owing cond~tions are met: The bottom of the ~ater service pipe. at a11 poLnts, sha11 be at 1east twe1ve (12) inches above the top of the sewer 1Lne. The water service pipe sha11 be p1aced on a so1id shel..f excavated at one side of the common trench. Section 4. "Ibat Section 1108 of the ''Uniform. P11.Dilbi.ng Code," 1.970 Edition, is hereby ..aD~~e:nded to read as fo11ow-s : Sec. 1108 Sewer and Water Pipes Non-·JJleta1i..c bu.~1.di.ng sewer or drainage piping shal..l.. not be run or l..a..i.d i.n. the same trench w~th water service pipes or any underground water pipes unl..ess both of the fo11o~g requirements are IDIIE!t: The bottom of the water piping at a11 points sha11 be at 1east twe1ve (12) ~nches above the top of the sewer piping. -2- • • • • The water p~ping sha11 rest on a so1id she1f on one side of the common trench. Section 5~ That a11 ordinances or parts of ordinances in conf1ict here~th are express1y repea1ed. on the of Attest : Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first read~g day of 1972. Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the 1972. Mayor day ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk I, • do hereby certify that the above and fore g oing is a true, a..ccurat:e and c01Dp 1e te copy of a Bi11 for an OrdLnance. ~traduced, read Ln fu11 and passed on first reading o n t:he day of 1972. ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk -3- • • r 32xl - - - - ..:uol 5 "72 INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COU NCILMAN A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONS 1 AND 2 • CHAPTER 5 • TITLE XIII, OF THE '69 E.M.C. CLOSING THE 'SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT FUND' INTO THE GENERAL FUND AND WATER FUND OF THE CITY. WHEREAS~ the necess~ty for the Specia1 Adjust- ment Fund no 1onger exists; and WHEREAS, it is the be1ief of the Finance Depart- ment and as recommended by Van Scbooneve1d, Shepherd and Co.,. Accou.nti.ng/Operat:Lng Study,. Jan.ua.ry, 1972,. that c1osi.ng the Specia1 Adjust:ment Fund into the Genera1 Fund and the Water Fund wou1d ~prove the Accounting System; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO as fo11ow-s: Sect~on 1. That 13-5-1 and 13-5-2 of the '69 E_M.C. are hereby express1y repea1ed. 13-5-1 Repea1ed 13-5-2 Repea1ed Section 2. A11 assets and 1iabi1it.ies of the Speci.a.1 Adju.stme::nt Fund sha.11 become the assets and 1i.abi.1ities of the Genera1 Fund except those accounts enti.t1ed ''Due fro-m McBroOlD Ditch'' and ''Due from Brown Ditch'' and a 1ike amount affecting the case account:,. which sha.11 become the assets and 1iabi1ities of the Water Fund. Section 3. 'The actions reso1ution sba11 be considered as of January 1. 1972. as set forth in this to have become effective Intr od~ced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading the day of 1972. -1- : ·-·- -- '32xl • Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the day of 1972. Mayor ATTEST: ex officio City C1erk Treasurer I. Kar1 F. No11enberger. do hereby certify that the above and f oregoing is a true_ accurate and comp1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of 1972. ex officio City C1erk-Treasurer -2- • • r 32xll - - - INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY CO UNC ILMA."l A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTIONS 1 AND 2, CHAPTER 5, TITLE XIII, OF THE '69 E.M.C . CLOSING THE 'SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT FU!'.'D' INTO THE GENERAL FUND A.."lD WATER FUND OF THE CITY. WHEREAS, the necessity for the Specia1 Adjust- ment Fund no 1onger exists; and WHE~, it is the be1ief of the Finance Depart - ment and as recommended by Van Schooneve1d, Shepherd and Co ., Accouncing/Operating Study, Ja~~ary, 19 72 , that c1osing the Specia1 Adjusbment Fund into the Genera1 Fund and the Water Fund wou1d ~prove the Accounting System; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO as fo11o-s: Sect::i.on 1 . That 13 -5-1 and 13-5 -2 of the '69 E.M.C. are hereby express1y repea1ed . 13 -5-l. Repeal.ed 13-5-2 Repea1ed Section 2. A11 assets and 1iabi1it::ies of the Specia1 Adjustment Fund sha11 become the assets and 1iabi1ities o f the Genera1 Fund except those accounts entit1ed "Due from McBroom Ditch" and "Due from Brown. Ditch'' and a 1Lke am.ount: affecting the case account, which sha11 become the assets and 1iabi1i-ies of the Water Fund. Section 3 . The actions as set forth in this reso1ut:ion sha11 be considered to have become effecti~e as of January 1, 1972. Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading the day of 1.972. -1.- : -- T 32xl • • Pub1ished as a B~11 for an Ordinance on the day of 1972. Mayor ATTEST: ex officio City C1erk-Treasurer I, Kar1 F. No11enberger, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and comp1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, ineroduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of 1972. ex officio City C1erk -Treasurer -2- ·-: • • -~ • INTRODU CED AS A BILL BY CO U NCILM&~ A BILL FOR AN ORDINA.'ICE REPEALING SECTIONS 1 AND 2, CHAPTER 5• TITLE XIII, OF THE '69 E .M .C. CLOSI NG THE 'SPECIAL ADJUSTMENT FU;,vo' INTO THE GENERAL FUND A.~ WATER FUND OF THE CITY. WHEREAS, the necessity for t he Specia1 Adjust - ment Fund no 1onger exists; and WHEREAS, it is the be1ief of t he Finance Depart- ment and as reco~ended by Van Schooneve1d, Shepherd and Co., Accounting/Operating Study, January. 1972, that: c1osing the Specia1 Adjustment: Fund into the Genera1 Fund and the Water Fund wou1d Lmprove the Accounting System; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, CO L ORADO as fo11o-s: Section 1. That 13-5-1 and 13-5-2 of the '69 E.M.C. are hereb y express1y repea1ed. 13-5-1 Repea1ed 13-5-2 Repea1ed Section 2. A11 assets and 1iabi1it::ies of the Specia1 Adjustment Fund sha11 become the assets and 1iabi1it::ies of the Genera1 Fund except those accounts entit::1ed ''Due from McBroom Ditch'' and ''Due from Brown. Ditch'' and a 1ike amount: affecting the case .a..cco\.J.Ut ~ which sha11 beco~e the assets and 1iabi1ities of the Water Fund ... Section 3. The actions reso1ution sha11 be considered as of January 1, 1972. as set: forth in this to have become effective Introduced. read in fu11 and passed on first reading the day of 1972. -1- • •, '32xl .......... • • Pub 1 ished a s a B ~1 1 for an Ord i nance o n t h e day o f 1972. Mayor ATTEST: ex officio City C1erk-Treasurer I, Kar1 F-No11enberger, do hereby certify that the above and fore g oing is a true, accurate and c omp1ete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of 1972. ex officio City C1erk-Tre as urer -2- ·-: • • -- • • .. ' • ~ 4 OFFICIAL: :=lTV C:.OUNC f L DC>C-UM:EIIIW Rc-11~....., TO i·l::'.Y 15 72 INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN A BILL FOR COUNCIL MEET,NG FILE c::rTY. OF. ENGL£W~D. CQI....D.. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING TO THE ATCHINSON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY • STATE OF COLORADO, A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A RAIL SPUR THROUGH THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as £o11o~s: Section 1. Upon the conditions hereinafter set forth there is hereby granted to the Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Ra..i1roa.d Cotnpan.y, SOID.etimes herei-nafter referred to as ''Rai1roa.d'', a. permit t:o construct, operate and m.ainta..in a rai.1 spur across certain hereLnafter described roads, streets and property in the City of Eng1ewood , Co1orado, somet:Lmes hereinafter referred to as ''Eng1ewood '', to-'W'i.t:: A strip of 1and 10 feet: ~de on both sides o£ a center 1Lne described as fo11o~: Beginning at: a point on the east 1ine of South WLndermere 80.8 feet: Southwest of the North 1Lne of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of Section 9, Township 5 South, Range 68 West; thence Southwester1y a1ong the arc of a 15° curve to the 1eft to intersection 'With the West R. 0. W_ 1i_n.e of Sou..th Windermere. Section 2. The foregoi-ng right, permit and 1icense is granted on1y upon the fo11owing express te~ and conditions, to -~t: A. A11 rights hereunder sha11 be exercised in such manner as to cause the 1east possib1e inconvenience to those entit1ed to make use of the streets or avenues invo1ved, and the 1east possib1e obstruction to trave1 in a.n.d along said streets or avenues. To this end, the Rai1road sha11, wherever possib1e, a1ways 1eave open at 1east one-ha1f of roads, streets or avenues adjacent to or crossLng the excavations and construction YOrk of the RPi1road and sha11 take a11 possib1e pre - cautions to prevent accidents and injuries in connection 'With any of its work a1ong the avenues and streets herei_n.a.bove u.ent:i..oned. In. no ev-ent:, du..ri:ng t:he process of construction and 1aying of said rai1 spur, or the maintenance thereof, sha11 any pub1ic or private street, -1- ..;uN 5 ·72 COUNCIL MEETlNG FlLE CITY OF ENGLE WOOD .. c::oL.-Q. : • • '32xl - • • • a11ey or right-of-way be obstructed to trave1 for a cont~nuous per~od of more than four (4) days. During the construction and maintenance of said rai1 spur~ there sha11 at no tLme be stored or 1eft on the surface of the streets, a11eys or other rights-of-way of the City of Eng1ewood any pipe. materia1s or equipment used in construction and maintenance of said conduit for a period of more than cwo (2) weeks at any one 1ocation before putting the same to use. B. It sha11 be necessary for the Rai1road, in the course of constructing said rai1 spur, to protect the Eng1ewood uti1ity mains insta11ed ~thin the above described right-of-way. The water 1ine sha11 be uncovered, c1eaned and encased in concrete in a manner prescr~bed by the Department of Uti1ities. Protection of uti1ity mains ~11 conform to the method detai1ed by the rai1road companies. Comp1ete p1ans inc1uding c1evatio~s and grades. ~i11 be required of the app1i- cant for approva1 by the City. C. A11 excavation and construction. insta11ation and maintenance ~ark which the Rai1road sha11 undertake pursuant to this permit, sha11 be subject to inspection by a c~petent and qua1ified Inspector who sha11 represent the City. and the Rai1road agrees to comp1y ~th a11 reasonab1e requests thereof Ln the performance of said work. A11 such work sha11 be performed so as not to interfere ~th. or damage any uti1ity 1ines owned by the City or pr~vate uti1ities existing ~thin such street. A£ter each excavation. the street sha11 be refi11ed; the upper 8 inches of the fi11 sha11 consist of 6 inches of good qua1ity compacted grave1 base course and 2 inches of aspha1tic concrete surfacing. surfacing to app1y where existing surfacing is disturbed. A11 of the aforesaid ~ork sha11 be free fro~ sett1ement arising out of any excavation and performed ~thin the 1Units of the trench excavation. D. Atchinson. Topeka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company. its successors and assigns sha11 at a11 times save and keep harm1ess the said City of Eng1e~ood and its City Counci1 and other officers and emp1oyees from any and a11 damages that may in any manner arise from the granting of this permit and the exercise of any rights granted hereunder; provided. ho~ever. tha~ the Rai.1road. its successors and assigns. sha11 not be so he1d 1iab1e un1ess g~ven fu11 opportunity to defend any such c1aLms. Section 3. Nothing herein sha11 be construed as gran~ing to Atchinson. Topeka & S P nta Fe Rai1road Company any rights other than the permit herein express1y defined and set forth. nor sha11 -2 - : • • r 32 x l - - - anything in this ordinance be construed as granting an exc1usive privi1ege to Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company, it being understood that the right of Eng1ewood to grant the use of its roads, streets, avenues, a11eys and other pub1ic rights-of- way to others for pub1ic and private purposes is fu11y reserved to En.g1ewood consi.stent, ho-wever, ""it:h the fu11 exercise of the rights granted by this permit:. Section 4. A copy of this Ordinance, signed by the Mayor and City C1erk-Treasurer of the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado, sha11 be sufficient evidence of the permit herein granted. The acceptance of this permit: by reso1ut:ion by the Rai1road, a copy of which sha11 be du1y certified to by the C1erk of the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado sha11 be conc1usive ev~dence of the acceptance by the Ra~1road of a11 the te~ and conditions of this Ordinance, and the Rai1road agrees to perform such terms and conditions. Section 5. It is express1y understood and agreed that the granting and acceptance of this permit is and sha11 be without prejudice to any rights or ob1igation of the Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company, or the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado, or any inhabitants thereof. Section 6 . All otller provisions of this ordinance to the contrary not- ::~~~!.·1 ~~~~e ::::::d ~~~~~e~ the railroad ~11 resu1t in the abandonment SectiOn 7. In -the -Opinion of the CitY Counci1 of the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado, this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of pub1ic property, hea1th, peace or safety in that t he Atchi~son , To p eka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company is urgent1y in need of the right -of -~ay herein granted for the construction of the rai1 spur herein set forth, and this Ordinance sha11 take effect upon pub1ication fo11o~ng fina1 passage. on the d a y of Attest: Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading day of 1972 . Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the 1972. Mayo r ex officio City C1erk I, , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and comp1ete copy of a. Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduc ed, read in fu11 and passed on first reading on the day of 1972. ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk -3 - -- • • --i -1 -~ (_· ' \ -,.,. -' T '-.. .,. <" ./. .,,-c. q ·._ ~~~- • I \ i j I .. i • • • INTRODUCE D AS A BILL BY COUXCI~~ A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE Gafu~TING TO THE ATCHINSON. TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY. STATE OF COLORADO. A PE~1IT TO CONSTRUCT AND MAI:-lTAIN A RAIL SPUR THROUGH THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION. AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAit-."ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO, as fo11o~s: Section 1. Upon the conditions hereinafter set forth there is hereby granted to the Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Ra.i..1road Company , sometimes herei..na.£t:er referred to as ''Rai1roa.d'', a permit: to construct:, operate and maintain a rai1 spur across certain hereinafter described roads, streets and property in the City of Eng1ewood , Co1ora.do, somet:Lmes hereina£t:er referred to as .. Eng1e'W'ood", t:o-~t:: A strip of 1and 1 0 feet ~de on both sides of a center 1ine described as £o11ows: Beginning at a point on the east 1ine of South Windermere 80.8 feet: Southwest of the North 1ine of the South I/2 of the South I/2 of the North I/2 of the North I/2 of Sect~on 9. Townsh~p 5 South, Range 68 West; thence Southwester1y a1ong the arc of a 15° curve to the 1eft to intersect~on ~th the West R.O.W. 1i..ne of South Wi._nderm.ere. Section 2. The fore.g oi.ng ri.ght, pertni.t: and 1icense is granted on1y upon the fo11owing express terms and conditions, to-wit:: A. ~1 rights hereunder sha11 be exercised in such manner as t:o cause the 1east possib1e inconvenience to those ent:it:1ed to make use of the s-reets or avenues i.nvo1ved, and the 1east: possi.b1e obstruction to trave1 in and a1ong said streets or avenues. To this end, the Rai1road sha11, ~herever possib1e, a1ways 1eave open at 1east one-ha1f of roads, streets or avenues adjacent to or crossing the excavations and construction work of the RPi1road and sha11 take a11 possib1e pre- cautions to prevent accidents and injuries Ln connection with any of its work a1ong the avenues and streets hereLnabove mentioned. In no event, during the process of construction and 1aying of said rai1 spur , or the ~aintenance thereof, sha11 any pub1ic or private street, : • • • a11e y or right -of -way be obstructed to trave1 for a continuous per1od of more than four (4) days. DurLng the construction and m aintenance of said rai1 spur~ there sha11 at no time be stored or 1eft on the surface of the streets, a11eys or other rig hts -of-way of the City of E n g 1ewood any pipe, mater~a1s or equipment used in construction and maintenance of said conduit for a period of more than two (2) weeks at any one 1ocation before putting the same to use. B. It sha11 be necessary for the Rai1road, in the course of constructing said rai1 spur, to protect the Eng1ewood uti1ity mains Lnsta11ed ~ithin the above described right-of-way. The water 1ine s ha11 be uncovered, c1eaned and encased in concrete in a manner prescribed by t he Department of U t~1 itie s. Protection of uti1ity mains ~i11 conform to the ~ethod detai1ed by the rai1road companies. Comp1ete p1ans inc1uding e1evations and grades , wi11 be required of the app1i- cant for approva1 by the City. C. A11 excavation and construction, insta11ation and maintenance work which the Rai1road sha11 undertake pursuant to this pe~it, sha11 be subject to inspection by a compe tent and qua1ified Inspector who sha11 represent the City. and the Rai1road agrees to comp1y with a11 reasonab1e requests thereof in the performance of said work. A11 such work sha11 be performed so as not to interfere ~th, or damage any uti1ity 1ines owned by the City or private uti1ities existing ~thin such street. A£ter each excavation, the street sha11 be refi11ed; the upper 8 ~nches of the fi11 sha11 consist of 6 inches of good qua1ity compacted grave1 base course and 2 inches of aspha1tic concrete surfacing, surfacing to app1y where existing surfacing is disturbed. A11 of the aforesaid work sha11 be free from sett1ement arising out of any excavation and performed within the 1~ts of the trench excavation. D. Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company, its successors and assigns sha11 at a11 times save and keep harm1ess the said City of Eng1ewood and its City Counci1 and other officers and emp1oyees from any and a11 damages that may in any ~anner ar~se fro~ the granting of this permit and the exercise of any rights granted hereunder; prov~ded. however, that the Rai1road. its successors and assigns. sha11 not be so he1d 1iab1e un1ess given fu11 opportunity to defend any such c~a~~s. Section 3. Noth~g herein sha11 be construed as granting to Atchinson. Topeka & SPnta Fe Rai1road Company any rights other than the permit herein express1y defined and set forth. nor sha11 -2- • • • • • anything in this ordinance be construed as g ranting an exc1usive privi1e ge to Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company, it being unders tood that the right of Eng1ewood to g rant the use of its roads, streets , avenues, a11e ys and other pub1ic rights-of- way to others for pub1ic and private purposes is fu11y reserved to Eng1ewood consistent, however, w~th the fu11 exercise of the rights granted by this permit . Section 4~ A copy of this Ordinance, signed by the Mayor and City C1erk-Treas urer of the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado, sha11 be sufficient evidence of the permit herein granted. The acceptance of this permit by reso1ution by the Rai1road, a copy of which sha11 be du1y certified to by the C1erk of the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado sha11 be conc1us~ve evidence of the acceptance by the Rai1road of a11 the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, and the Rai1road agrees to perform such terms and conditions. Section 5. It is express1y understood and agreed that the granting and acceptance of this permit is and sha11 be ~ithout prejudice to any rights or ob1igation of the Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company, or the City of Eng1e~ood, Co1orado, or any inhabitants thereof . . Secti?n. 6. All other provisions of this ordin~ce to the coot:ra.rv not.- w-ithst.a.ndtng,. d1suse of thi s trackage by the railroad -w-ill result in the aba.D.don t of any and all rights gr:1.nted hereunder . men Sectio~. In the opinion of the-City Counci1 of the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado, this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of pub1ic property, hea1th, peace or safety in that t he Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company is urgent1 y in need of the right-of-way herein granted for the construction o f t he rai1 spur herein set forth, and this Ordinance sha11 cake e ffe c t upon pub1ication fo11ow1ng fina1 passage. on the day of Attest: Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first reading day of 1972. Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the 1972. M a y o r ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk I, , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and comp1ete copy o f a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced. read Ln fu11 and passed on first reading on t:he day of 1972 . ex off~c~o C~ty C1erk -3 - • • I I - - ;-~\ \, ,""-": ~ .~ 7 - <= Nka r> T rc511CA -Tr-.c A .T.(:-5. ;-_ R_y i --~ ~y.Cc-_m . Lu-,c_· Ry. cb.-Proper-6f L~:::S - \ \ ! ' -- - • • INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY CO UN CIL'UL~ A BILL FOR AN ORD INANCE GRANTING TO THE ATCHINSON. TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY. STATE OF COLORADO. A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A RAIL SPUR THROUGH THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. A Mt.."NICIPAL CORPORATION. Al'<"D DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD. COLORADO. as fo11ows: Sect~on 1. Upon the cond~tions hereinafter set forth there is hereby granted to the Atchinson~ Topeka & Santa Fe Ra..i1road Company, sorneti..mes here.i.:nafter referred to as ''R.a.i1road'', a permit to construct, operate and ~aintain a rai1 spur across certain hereinafter described roads, streets and property in the City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado, somet~s hereinafter referred to as ''Eng1eW"ood'', to-'Wi.t:: A strip of 1and 10 feet ~de on both sides of a center 1i.ne described a...s £o11ows :-- Beginning at a point on the east: 1i.ne of South Windermere 80.8 feet South~st of the North 1ine of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the North 1/2 of the North 1/2 of Section 9. Township 5 South, Range 68 West; thence Southwester1y a1ong the arc of a 15° curve to the 1eft to intersection ~th the West R.O.W. 1ine of South WLnde~ere. Section 2. The foregoing right. permit and 1icense is granted on1y upon the fo11owing express te~s and conditions. to-~t: A. Al1 rights hereunder sha11 be exercised in such manner as to cause the 1east possib1e inconvenience to those entiA1ed to ~ake use of the streets or a~enues invo1ved. and the 1east possib1e obstruction to trave1 ~n and a1ong said streets or avenues. To this end. the Rai1road sha11. wherever possib1e, a1ways 1eave open at 1east one-ha1f of roads. streets or avenues adjacent to or crossLng the exca~ations and construction work of the RPi1road and sha11 take a11 possib1e pre- cautions to prevent accidents and injuries in connection ~th any of its work a.1ong the avenues and streets herein~bove mentioned. In no event. during the process of construction and 1aying of said rai1 spur. or the ~aLntenance thereof. sha11 any pub1ic or private street. -1- • • T 32X - • • a11ey or ri.ght -of -"'-"ay be obstructed to trave1 for a continuous perLod of more than four (4) days . During the construction and main tenance o£ said rai1 spur~ there sha11 at no time be stored or 1eft on the surface of the streets, a11eys or other rights -of-way of t he City of E ng1ewood any pipe , materia1s or equipmen t used in c o nstruction and m aintenance o f said condui t f o r a perio d of more than ~o (2) weeks at any o ne 1 ocat i on before pu t ting the same to use . B. I t sh a11 be n e cess a ry fo r the Rai 1 road, in the cou r se of cons t ruc ting s aid rai 1 spu r, t o protect the Eng1ewood u t i1ity m ains i n sta11ed w i t hin the a b ove de s c r i be d righ t-of -way . The water 1 i ne s ha11 be u n covered , c1eaned and e n case d in conc re t e in a m anne r pre scribe d by t he Depar tme nt of U ti 1 ~t~es . P rot e ct~on of ut i1i t y ma~s ~11 conform to the me t h od d e tai 1 ed b y the r a i1road compan ~e s . Com p 1 ete p1 ans i nc 1 uding e1evat~ons and grades , w i1 1 be r e qui red o f the app 1 i- cant for approva1 by the City. C. A11 excavation and construction, insta1 1ation and maintenance work which the Rai1road sha1 1 undertake pursuant to t hi s permit, sha 1 1 be subject to ins pection by a competent and q ua1i f ied Inspector who sha11 represent the Cit y , and the Rai1road a g rees to comp1y with a.11 reasonab1e re quests thereof in the perfortn.a.n.ce of said work. A11 such work sha.11 be performed so as not to interfere ~th, or damage any uti1ity 1ines owned by the City or private uti1ities existing within such street. After each excavation, the street sha11 be refi11ed; the upper 8 inches of the fi11 sha.11 consist of 6 inches of g ood qua1ity compacted g rave 1 base course and 2 inches of as ph a1tic concrete surfacing, surfacing to app1 y where existing surfacing is disturbed. A11 of the aforesaid work sha11 be free from sett1ement arising out of any excavation and performed within the 1Lmits of the trench excavation. D. Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company, its successors and assigns sha11 at a11 times save and keep harm1ess the said City of Eng1ewood and its City Counci1 and other officers and emp1oyees from any and a11 damages that may ~n any ~anner ar~se from the gra..nti_ng of this perm.it: an.d the exercise of any rights granted hereunder; provided, however, ~hat the Rai1road, ~ts successors and assigns, sha11 not be so he1d 1~ab1e un1ess g iven £u1 1 opportunity co de f end any such c1ai~s. Section 3 . N othing herein sha11 be construed as granting to Atchinson, T ope ka & S Pnta F e Rai1road Company any rights other than the permdt herein express1y defined and set forth, nor sha11 -2- II • • '32xl - - - - anyth~n g in this ordinance be construed as g rantin g an exclusive privile ge co Atchinson , Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company, it being understood t hat t he r i~ht of Englewood to g rant the use of its roads, streets, avenues, alle ys and other public ri gh t s -o f - way to others for public and private purposes is fully reserved to E n glewood consistent, ho~ever, with the full exercise of the rights gran ted by thi s permit. Section 4. A copy of this Ordinance, signed by the Mayor and City Clerk-Treasurer of the City of E nglewood, Colorado, shall be sufficient evidence of t he permit herein granted. The acceptance of this permit by resolution by the Railroad, a copy of which shall be duly certified to b y the Clerk of the City of Englewood, Co1orado sha11 be conc1us~ve evidence of the acceptance by the Ra~1road of a11 the terms and conditions of this Ordinance, and the Rai1road a g rees to perform such te~s and conditions. Section 5. It is express1y understood and a g reed that the granting and acceptance of this permit is and sha11 be without prejudice t o any ri gh ts or ob1igation of the Atchinson, Topeka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company. or che City of Eng1ewood, Co1orado. or any inhabitants thereof. Section 6 . All ot.ber p rovisions of th is ord i n:l.Dce to the contr . w-tthst.and ing. disuse of t.bis t.racka~e by t.he r a ilro:a.d ~viii r esult in the 3 ~00 ~- o£ any ::Lnd all rights gr:l.Dted hereunder. ournent. Section 7. In the opinion of the City Counci1 of the City of Eng1ewood . Co1orado. this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of pub1ic property. hea1th, peace or safety in t hat the Atchinson. Topeka & Santa Fe Rai1road Company is urgent1y in need of the right -of-way herein granted for the construction of the rai1 spur herein set forth. and this Ordinance sha11 take effect upon pub1ication fo11owing fina1 passage. on the day of Attest: Introduced. read in £u11 and passed on first reading day of 1.972. Pub1ished as a Bi11 for an Ordinance on the 1.972. Mayor ex officio City Cl.erk I, , do hereby certify that: the above and foregoing is a true. accurate and complete copy of a Bi11 for an Ordinance, introduced, read ~n fu11 and passed on first: reading on t:he day of 1972. ex officio City Cl.erk -3- • ·- -- r 32xl • \ ,.... -'-.-7-\ --~:-__ _ ~-=--=---\ \ • • ' ~-$..1'#/ .... ~J!Yir~ .... -!Y .fA./C-~ (.S. S~~JYr,~ F~ ~-''!';.., .... .:Z) • • -~ ; l j I I • • r - - • • • ex_i._sts, • RESOLt.rriON NO. SER.Z.ES O F 1972 A RESOLUTION CLOSING DEBR..XS CLEARANCE FUND TO THE GENERAL FUND WHEREAS,the necessity of the Debris Cl..earance FUnd no l..onger a.nd WHERE.AS, i.t .i.s the bel.. i.e£ of the Fi...n.a..nce Department and as reccxnme.nded by Va..n Schoon.evel..d, Sheperd and Co., Accou.nt:L.ng/oper.ati..ng study, Ja..n.uary. 1972, that i...n. cl..osi...ng the Debris C1eara..nce Fund to the Genera1 Fund ~ou1d streaml..Lne the AccountLnq System 1 NCJIW, THEREFORE, BE rr RESOLVED BY THE CJ:TY c:x:>ONCrL OP THE CITY OF ENGLEWCX>D, COLORALXl, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A11 assets and 1iabi.1i.ti.es of the Oebr~s Cl..earance Fund sha.11. becOftle the assets and 1i..a.bi.1it.i..es of the General.. FUnd. Section 2 . A11 expenditures of the Debris Cl..earance Fund i..ncu.rred aha.11 beccxne the expenditures o~ the General.. Fu..n.d. Sec::tion 3. A1l.. revenue of the Debris Cl..ea....ra.nce Fund recei.vabl..e received shal..l.. become the revenue of the G eneral.. Fund. Section 4. The fund ba1a.nce o.f the Oebri..s C1e.a...rance Fund sha11 be joi..ned -ith the Genera.l. Fund fund ba.l.ance. Section S. The acticn-us as set .forth in th.i.s reso1u.ti.on are effective as of January 1~ .1.972. ADOPTED AND APPROVED t.hi..s day of .1972. MAYOR ATTEST: EX OP'FXC:I:O CrrY CLER.'<: I~ XA%.1. F . No.l..l.enberqer~ ex oL.fici.o City C.l.erk o.f the City or Eng1ewood~ State of Co1orado, do hereby certi..fy that the above and foregoLng i..s a true~ accurate~ and comp.l.ete copy of Reao~ution No. _______ , Serie• oL 1972. EX OFF:I:.C:I:O CrrY CLERK • • • I' 32X I - - - - - RESOLUTXON NO. SERIES OF 1972 A RESOLUTION CLOSING DEBRIS CLEARANCE FUND TO THE GEN"ERAL FOND WHER:E:.AS,the necessity of the Debris Cl.earance Fund no 1onger exi-sts • and WHEREAS, it i.s the be1i.ef of the Finance Department and as recommended by Van Schooneve1d, Sheperd and Co •• Accounti.ng/opera.ti..ng study, January, 1972, that i-n c1osLng the Debris C1earance Fund to the Ge.nera.1 Fu..nd 'WOu1d streant.l.i..ne the Accounti.ng System; NOW, THEREFORE, BE rr RESOLVED BY THE CXTY CX>UNCIL OF THE CrrY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS: Secti.on 1. A11 assets and 1i.a.bi.1iti.es of the Debris C1earance Fun.d sha.l.l. becOft\e the assets and 1i.a.bi.l.iti.es of the Genera1 Fund. Section 2. ~1 expenditures of the Debris C1earance Fund i-ncurred shal.1 become the expenditures of the General. Fund . Section 3. A11. revenue of the Debri.s Cl.earance Fund recei.v&b1e received shal.l. become the revenue of the G enera1 Fund. Section 4. The fund bal.ance of the Debris Cl.eara.nce Fund sha.l.l. be joi...n.ed "Wi.th the Genera.1 Fund fund ba.l.a..nce. Section 5. The a c tions as set forth in tbi.s r e sol.uti.on are e ffective as of January 1., 1.97 2. AIX>PTED AND APPROVED th:i.s day of 1.972. MAYOR ~ES T: EX OFFICXO C:rrY CLERK I, Karl. F. Nol.l.e.nberger, ex o~~icio Ci.ty C1erk of the City of Eng1ewood, State of Col.orado, do hereby certify that the above and foreqo~q i.s a true, accurate, and compl.ete copy o£ Resol.uti.on No . Series of 1.972. E X OFFXC:X:O C:rrY CLERX • -• - - - ------· SER.X.ES OF 1972 RESOLtrrY.ON NO. A RESOLUTION INCREASING APPBOPRXATIONS rN THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE: COUNTY BeAD AND BRIDGE APPROPRIATION WHEREAS,. A::rapah.oe County appropri.ates and spends SU%1'LS each year to ass:Lst the C ity of Eng 1e~ -i.th ma.i..nte.n.ance of streets : and WHEREAS, the City of Engl.~ood der.i.ves eco:ncani.c: be.nefi.t from this source: a..nd WHEREAS, the i..ndepe.n.de.nt auditors of Van Schoonevel.d , Sheperd and Co.,. recommended i..n. the ma.nagente.nt 1etter,. April., 1972, subm..i..tted to the C ouncil. on May l., 1972 , that this Revenue and Expenditure be appropri.ated, even though the City does not receive or expend the funds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE rr RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI:TY O .F ENGLEWOOD.. COLORAIX> AS FOL..LOW'S: Section 1.. The fol.l.~:Lng :Lnc:..rease to G8raer'&l. Fund Revenue: Account No. 02-63.43 1ncreaae Est~te : $48,985.28 Sec:ti.on 2. The fol.l.owing :Lnc:rea.ae to Ge.n.erA...l.. Fund Expe.nd.i..ture App:ropri.ati.on : Account No. 37-283 Section 3. The actions e£~ective as of January 1, 1972. rncrease Appropra1ti.on: $48,985 .28 set Eorth in this reso1ution ADOPTED AND APPROVED this -------day o~ 1972. MAYOR ATTEST : EX OFF XC ::I.O C 1'TY CLE.RK X, K&r1 P. No11enberqer, ex o~Eicio City C1erk of the City o~ Enq1ewood, State o~ Co1orado .. do hereby certify t.h.at the above and :fo::regoi..ng is a true, accurate, and comp1ete copy of Reao1ution No. Series of 1972. EX OPPXC.l:O CrrY CLERK -- RESOLUT I0:-1 :-1 0. S E RIE S O F 1.97 2 RESOLU T I O N AUTHORIZI ~G EXE C UTI O N O F A GRANT AG RE EMENT. WH ERE AS, the City of E n g 1ewood, Co1orado, a Municipal. C orporation (the ''App1icant:'') has heretofore submitted a n app1icat:ion to the United States of America, Department of H ousing and Urb an D e v e 1opment (the ''Govern- ment'') for a g rant under Section 702 of the Housing and Urban Deve1opm ent: Act: of 1965, as amended, to aid in financin g a c e rtain pub 1ic works identified as Project No. WSF-C0-08-00-01.22; and WHEREAS, the Government: has approved the said app1icat:i.on and has submdt:t:ed to the App1icant: a certain Grant: Agreement: (the ''Ag reement:'') for approval. and execution b y the App1i.cant:, w h ich said Agreement: is sat: is factory. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ENGLE\'11000, COL ORADO, that: the sa.i.d Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto~ be and the same is hereby approved. The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to execute the said A g re ement in the name and on beha1f of the App1icants in as man y counterparts as may be necessary~ and the Director of Finance~ ex officio City C1erk-Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to affix or impress the officia1 sea1 of ~he App1icant thereon and to attest the same. The proper officer is directed to forward the said executed counterparts of the said Agreement to the Government~ together ~th such other documents ev~dencing the approva1 and author- ization to execute the same as may be required by the Govern- IDent. ADOPTED AND APPROVED th~s 5th day of June. A.D .• 1.972 . Mayor CERTIFICATE I~ the undersigned~ hereby certify: (1) that I am the du1y appointed~ qua1ified and acting Director of Finance~ ex officio City C1erk-Treasurer of the App1icant designated in the foregoin g Reso1ution Authorizing Execution of Grant Agreement; (2) that I am the custodian of the records of the App1icant inc1uding the records of i t s Governing Body -1.- • • -.• - - - - de s~gna t ed 1 n t he R eso1ution ; (3 ) that the above cop y of the Res o 1ution i s a true and co rre ct cop y of t h e sai d Res- o1ution a s a dopted at a du1 y authorized meeting of t he said Govern i n g B ody he1d on June s. 197 2 and on fi1e and of record; (4 ) t h at the said meeting was du1y convened and he1d in accordance ~ith a11 app1icab1e 1a~s and re gu1ations, that a 1eg a1 quorum ~as present throughout the meeting , that a 1eg a11y sufficient number of m.eutbers of the said Gov-erning Body voted i.n the proper man.ner for the adoption of the sai.d Reso1uti.on, and that a11 other requirements for the proper adoption of the said Reso1uti.on ~ere £u11y observed; and (5) that no action has been taken by the said Governing Body or the App1i.cant to reconsider, amend or rescind the said Reso1ution. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereu:n.to set: m y hand and the sea1 of the App1icant this day of A.D .• 1972. Kar1 F . N o11enberger Director of Finance. ex officio City C1erk-Treasurer -2- -- • • • RES O LUTIO N N O . S E R IES O F 1 972 RE SOLU T ION AUTHO RIZ I NG EXE C U T I O N O F A GRANT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, the City of E n g 1ewood, Co1orado, a Munici.pa1 Corporation (the "'App1ica.n.t") has h e retofo re submitted an a pp1ication to the United States of Ame rica, Depa.rc:men.t o f H ou s ing and U rban Deve 1 opm.e nt (the ''Go ve rn- ment'') for a g rant under S e ction 702 of the H ousing a..nd Urban D e ve1opme nt Act of 1965, as amended, to aid in financing a c e rtain pub1i..c works identified as Project No. WSF-C0-08-00-0122; and WHEREAS, the Government has approved th~ said app1ication and has submdt:ted to the App1i.cant a certain Grant Ag reement (the ''Ag reement:'') for approva1 and execution b y the App1icant, which said Agreement is satisfactory. NOW , THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ENGLEWOOD, COL ORADO, that the said Agreement, a copy of which is attac h ed hereto, be and the same is hereby approved . The May or is hereby authorized and directed to execute the said A g reement in the name and on beha1f of the App1icant 7 in as many counterparts as may be necessary 7 and the Director of Finance 7 ex officio City C1erk-Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to affix or impress the officia1 sea1 of the App1icant thereon and to attest the same. The proper officer is directed t:o for'W'a.rd the said executed counterparts of the said Agreement to t:he Goverrument 7 tog ether ~t:h such other documents e~dencing the approva1 and author- ization to execute the same as may be required by the Govern- tnent. ADOPTED AND APPROVED th1s 5th day of June. A.D .• 1972. Mayor CERTIFICATE I 7 the undersigned 7 hereby certify : (1) that I am t:he du1y appointed 7 qua1i..fied and acting Director of Finance 7 ex officio City C1erk-Treasurer of the App1icant designated in the foregoing Reso1ution Authorizing Execution of Grant Agreement; (2) that I am the custodian of the records of the App1icant inc1uding the records of its Governing Body -1 - • • • - • des~g nated ~n t he Reso1ution; (3) that the above cop y of the Resolution is a true and correct copy of the said Res - o1ution as adopted at a duly authorized meeting of the said G overning Bod y he1d on June 5, 1972 and on fi1e and of record; (4) that t he said meeting ~as du1 y convened and he1d in accordance ~ith a11 app1icab1e 1a~s and regulations, that a 1eg a1 quorum ~as present throughout the meeting, that a 1ega11y sufficient n umb er of members of the said Governing Body voted in t he proper manner for the adoption o f the said Resolution . and t hat: a11 other requirements for t he proper adoption of t h e said Reso1ution were fu11y observed; and (5) that: no action has been taken by t he said Governing Body or the Applicant: t o reconsider, amend or rescind the said Reso1ution. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have the sea1 of the App1icant this A.D. • 1972. hereunto set my hand and day of Kar1 F. No11enberger Director of Finance. ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer -2- ·- • •