HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-08-04 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet• . ----
0 -
I •
•
0
--------
CITY COU Cll EETl G -Regular
Au ust 4, 1975 -
-•
0 -
AGENDA FOR
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 4, 1975
I•
:30 p .m. Call to order, invocation by Reverend Fred Hahn,
Imman uel Lutheran Church, 3695 South Acoma,
pledge of allegiance by Camp Fire Girls, Lowell
Elementar y School , and roll call .
..
1. Min utes .
(a) Minutes of the regular meeting of July 2 1,
1975 . (Copies enclosed.)
2. Visitors.
Mrs. Myrt le ones , 5020 Sou h Washington,
will a ppear before Cou cil o discuss
matters or concern.
Mr. Roy Richards, 2189 'est Vassar Avenue,
will appear before Council o discuss
paving problems on Va sar Avenue .
Mr. Larry Clark, A orney, and Mr. Kennet
E. Chandler will be pr
a c n e i o~ ershi r
545 OU n Bro
Liquors , Inc.
(d) 0 her Visitors.
3 . Pu blic He r1n s.
( )
,o
'
• •
-
\ I
•
0
•
page 2
August 4 Agenda
3. Public Hearings (Continued).
~
~ ...... "T"'-~ 7~~
-.3' '('..
,..
'?.>-'-?~
(b) Ordinance on final reading repealing and
reenacting sections 22.4-7 and 22.4-8
(c)
(d)
entitled " R-3-A and R-3-B Multi-Family
Residence District," of the City of Engle-
wood comprehensive zoning ordinance
(Ordinance No. 26, Series 1963, as amended)
wherein said sections relate to permitted
uses, minimum area of lot, permitted density
bonus system, minimum floor area, lot
coverage, open space, landscaping, utilities,
minimum frontage of lot, maximum height of
buildings, minimum yard areas, permitted
accessory uses and environmental guidelines.
(Ordinance enclosed.)
Ordinance on final reading amending section
22.8 entitled "Definitions," of the Co pre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 26,
Series of 1963, as amended) by revising
and amending certain definitions contained
in said section and adding new definitions
thereof. (Ordinance enclosed.)
Ordinance repealing Article I and II,
(Chapter 8) Title III, of the Englewood
Municipal Code entitled "Moving" and "Wrecking'
and reenacting the same with amendments.
(Ordinance enclosed.)
4. Communicat ions -No Action Recommended.
(a) Minutes of h Plannin and Zonin
met ng of June 17, 1975. (Copie
Commission
nclo ed.)
(b) Minu e of the Polle Pension Board eetin
of uly 2 , 1975. (Copies enclosed.)
(c) inu s or the El ction Board e in or
ly 18, 1975. (Co iea enclosed .)
( )
rvic Board
nclca d.)
'
• •
-•
0 I •
·. •
page 3
August 4 Agenda
5. Communicat i ons -Action Recommended .
Yf6S (a) A 3.2 beer license renewal for Bob's
Grocery, 3296 South Washington. (Council
Action Request Form enclosed.)
6.
Recommendation from the Planning and Zoning
Commission on revisions to the proposed
ordinance on movement and demolition of
structures. (Copies enclosed.)
Recommendation from the Planning and Zoning
Commission on an amendment o the master
street plan section of the comprehensive
plan. (Copies enclosed.)
...---(d) Recommendation from the Planning and Zoning
.,.,.f ...c. Commission on approval of the Weaver/Wiebe
r ezoning request. (Copies e closed.)
City Attorney.
(a) Ordinance on final reading:
(i) nding Section 12(d) (5), Chapter 10,
Tit l e V, of the Englewood Municipal
Code, by extending the amount of ime
in which he Ci Manager has o render
a written decision on an employee
griev nee to ten (10) business days.
(Copies enclosed.)
(b ) Bi ll s r o r Ordina nc
(i )
( 1)
( ) 0
(1 )
ac ion i n
o n.
-.
• •
-
•
•
• •
<.
page 4
Augus t 4 Agenda
6. City Attorney (Continued).
(e) Attorney's Choice.
7 . City Manager.
1 ~ (a) Consideration of six quarter budget for
the period of July, 1975 through December ,
1976. (Resolution enclosed.) ~ (b)
(c)
Report from the Assistant City Manager
to the City Manager concerning the Dog
Committee's recommendations. (Copies
enclosed.)
Report from the Director of Public Works
to th City Manager concerning additional
information on hazardous sidewalks.
(Copies enclosed.)
(d) Manager's Choice.
8. General Discussion.
(a) Mayor's Choice.
(i) Proclamation declaring September 8,
1975 as National Cancer Day. (Copies
enclosed. )
(b) Council Member's Choice.
9. Ad ournme t.
'
• •
•
• (
I •
•
<.
I 'JI r --1 r I-o F
I TRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A BILL FOR
AN ORDIN ANCE AP PROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THE CITY
OF LITTLETON, COLORADO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND THE
LITTLETON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TO ESTABLISH A D CON-
ST RUCT A JOINT.FIRE TRAINING FACILITY; ANB BECIARIHS AN
EMER8f!NCY .
WHEREAS, both Englewood and L1 tleton are Home
Rul e ci ties operating under Charters purs uan to r i c le
XX of the Const'tution of the State of Colorado; and
WH REAS, it is de med by th part1e t o this
A ree e n o be in thei r b es int~ e o e.ta lish nd
con rue a J Olnt fire r i nin fac.11 y; a d
c
·l -
CIT ' COU 'CIL
p l
y f
'
• •
-
•
• (
...
0
•
written instrument captioned "Agreement", which is
as follows:
THJS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this --'----day of
------~ 1975, by and bet'tleen the City of Littleton, Colorado,
(hereinafter "Littleton''), a Municlpal"corporatton of the State of Colorado;
the City of Englewood, Colorado, (hereinafter "Englewood''), a Municipal
corporation of the State of Colorado; and the Littleton Fire Protection
District (hereinafter "Dlatrlct''), a fire protection dlatrlct orpni&ed
pur uant to th laws of the State of Colorado.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, both Littleton and Enclewood are Home Rule Cltlea
operating under Charter purauant to Article XX of the Con1Utution of the
ta of Colorado; and
\1 H REA , lt I m b th puti to thl Ag em to
ln Ir t Int t1 to tabllab and co h\tct a joint fir train
;.
.·
• •
-
0
•
c osts of operation and maintenaii~e being divided between them in a fair
a nd equitable manner as set forth hereinafter with greater specificity; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement ls made to further the purposes of
the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Littleton, Engl~
and the District. ;.
NOW, THEREFORE, it ls mutually covenanted and agreed by and
betw the parties hereto as follows :
I. FACIUI'IES
A. T joint facilities which hall b kn n a the Englewood-Littl ton
Fire Training C nter, shall loca on a four (4) acr pare
situate in th Cl of
Colondo, to-wl :
•
• •
•
-
n.
•
0
•
4.1 acres, more or~ess, subject to all easements
and rights-of-way of record and reserving to the
public, use of an easement for sewer and utilities
along the east 15' thereof.
B. Littleton agrees that it shall convey an undivided one-half (1/2)
interest in the above-described real property to Englewood,
which property ls to be held by both municipalities for perpetual
use as a training facility.
C. Said property shall be under the joint control of Littleton, Englewood,
and the District and the use shall no t be changed without the
consent of all parties to this Agreement. Should the facility
cea e to function as a tratnln center for fire pr vention, the
Ci Councils of Englewood and Littleton and th Board of th
Di trlct hall th r af r b fre to di of th tructu and
r Ip rty aa they hall flt.
A. Th part
d fa
p
11
;.
• •
,
• -
0
•
land donated by Littleton to this project. Upon execution of this
Agreement, Englewood will deposit $7, 500 in a special account
to be known as District-Englewood-Littleton account at the
Littleton National Bank, and District hall deposit in the ame
account upon the execution of this Agreement, 3, 750. Upon
~e award of a construction bid per II D below, Englewood shall ;.
' deposit $72, 50 0 in the same account and Di · 'rict shall deposit
$36,250 in the same account. Dlsbursemen s from said account
shall be made in accordance with thi s Agret>ment b the
signatures of the Treasurer and City Manager of Littl ton and
an annual audit of this account shall
I
mad a part o! Litt! ton' a
annual audit.
C . After the preparation of th flnal plans and apeclffcation for
aid racfUty, and after appro;al of th am b th rtr C' 1 r
•
Comm ltt , th archit ct a II ub it aid pl
bdun rp du r qutr r publt p
ntractor tall b af r
pproval of au p rtf
• • A
n ra D abo , lt la of
• • • ·S·
-•
0 I•
•
for the design and construction of said facilities shall be
paid for on the foll~ing pro rata basis:
Englewood 50%
Littleton 25%
District 25%
F. If no contract ls awarded pursuant to paragraph D above within
twel ve (12) months from the date of this Agreement, then the
fun_ds remaining in the account established under paragraph
11-B above will be returned on a pro rata basis t.o District
and Englewood, after all proper expenses arising from tbu
~greement have been paid and the undivided one-half (1/2)
interest in the subject land returned b Englewood to Ltttl -
ton, and this Agreement shall th be terminated and of no
furth r force or ff, ct.
G. o otb r con1truct1on other than as s t forth above hall b
allO"Wed on th Ibo\' -d crlbed property wlthou the Jo int
authorl.utlon of Di trl t, E ood and lttle n.
m. OPE ILITY
A. A perman to kno n a th J int Tratnin tU
Co ·~.
Th 0 (2)
• 11
(l)
;.
'
:
• •
•
0
•
date of this Agreement and written notice of said appalntmenta
~,.
shall be given to District, Englewood and Littleton.
B. The purpose of the Committee shall be to provide adm inistrative
direction for all operations of the joint training facility
and attendant matters, both during th course of con tructlon
and after the facility ts in operation.
C. Decisions of the Committee shall be made by a majority vote.
:
In the event that a ma ort vot c annot be arrived at on
any matters within the cop of their authority, then, and In
that event, a fifth member of th Co mmttt sh 11 be appointed
for th purpos of chl.ng a d rminatton of that 188u •
The flft:h member hall b individual \\-ho e tdenttt ts a reed
upan b th Di trlc , or In th abs
r shall be pPOlnt
of
Colora
•
rrln
It b • •
(
•
• t•
•
(30) days by said appointing authority with notice of said new
appointment being gften as required above.
E. Th Committee may adopt such rules of procedur that th d m
advisabl e .
F. The Committee shall e tabltsh all nex'e sary rule and r gula Ion
conce rning the operation and us of said training faclli •
G. The Ccrmmtttee shall establish a r ntal schedule for use of th
training !actllty by outside partt s.
H . Tbe Committee on or before August 1 t of each y r shall prepare
and submit a budget for the operation and maintenanc of th Train-
ing Factuty for the following year to DI trict, E l ood. and Llttl ton.
Upon th. approval of said bu t b District, Engl ood, and
Littleton, an amount totaling th full amount of aald budge
•hall deposited In th account tablish under n-B ebov
on th toll in pro ra ba I , on or ro uary 15th o f
r ft :
Pavm lro td 11 b
II
'·
;.
• •
-
(
•
•
•
• •
I. Any supplemental approa~~tton to the approved budget , or any
amount required for the first year of operation of the tmlnlng
facility, shall b jointly approved and paid in accordance with
~ par agraph~ above.
J. Normal operation and maintenance costs shall include those
util i~ co ts incidental to the operation of aid facility,
together with that insurance necessary to adequately cover
said facility.
IV. USE OF FACILITIES
A . The uae of the training facWUes •hall be limited to Littleton, .
Eqlewood and th Dtatrlct and •hall, at the pl aaure of th
Comm ittee, b available for oth r recognized bona !lde Fi
Departments, law enforc ment a encl , re cu and oth r m r-
Ullita. R tal of aid facllltt to oth r nci
rtnlned b th Comml and pro l at a ra
G-
m-Yi v • Tho r tala r hed or u of a
nd e r lt.ed to A ••
hall b
lor in
Cacillt
'
• •
(
•
•
•
•
0 t•
•
B, Should the training facfJ.tty be damaged or destroyed while used
by any party t.o this Agreement or other renting agency and as
a result of said use, it shall be the responsibiltty of that agency
t.o pay for any and all damag done t.o these facilities should
said damage not b covered by any insurance,
C. No par~ to this Agreement shall assign any rights hereunder
without the consent of th other parties . All of the terms
and provisions hereof s hall be binding upo n and inure t.o
the benefit of the partie here , their succe . sore and
a igns.
V. TERMINA TION
Thi Agr ment ma onl
of Di trict, Engl ood and Littl t.on.
E £Ct'T D th
ATT T:
Ct
·1 •
termina d upon th joint ap roval
y e>f _______ __, l 975.
CITY 0 E D
rrY 0 LITT TO .
•.
'
• •
-
(
•
• l•
•
LITI'LETON FffiE PROT CTIO DJSTR I T
ATTEST:
Varian A bbaugh, Secretary
Sec. ion 2.
Th
ex ute ame
and the Ci y
th Seal of
~ ction l.
0 h
ayor is hereby authori. d and directed to
for and on behalf of he City or Engle~ood
Cle rk i direc ed to at e a and ffi~
he City h reto.
ad in ull
• 19 s .
lll or n
. I •
din
h
•.
'
• •
,
-
•
•
•
• •
ATTEST:
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, William D. James, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy
of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and
passed on first reading on the 4th day of August, 19 75.
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
• 12 .
•
• •
-
•
•
0 t•
•
..
RESOLUTION NO . __ , SERIES OF 1975
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE REVENUE SH ARIN G AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
FUND.
WHEREAS , the City Counci I has approved a six quarter budget
spanning the time period July, 1975 , through December , 1976 .
NOW, THEREFORE , BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCI L OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORAOO , as fol lows:
Section 1.
The fol lowing estimated revenues and appropriations are hereby
authorized in the Revenu Sha ring Fund
Section 2.
Revenues
Re ven ue Sharing
Interest Income
Fund Balance
Tot11I
Appropriation
Storm Dr11 i nage
s 12,285
15,000
17 ,830
s 45, 115
s 45 , 115
The fol lowing estima ed re nu s and appropriations are h reby
authorized in the Pub I le I pro nt Fund.
Rev nues
Feder Grant -River Develop nt s 628,000
Sal s Tax -decreose ( 160,000)
ven Sh ring 45,115
fund lance 61 .757
Total Est I ed v nu $ 574,872
----=·
• •
-
•
•
•
Sec ti on 3 .
•
0
•
fu?propr i at i o~
River Development
Zuni Street
Land Acquisition -Little Dry Creek
Greenhouse
Interchange Park
Storm Drainage -General
Northwest Gree nbelt
Romans Park
Space Utf I ization Study
Sidewalk District
Housing
Fi re Training Facility
Total Appropriations
$ 628 ,000
(50 ,000J
(67,845)
35,ooo
15,ooo
5,000
(8 ,000J
8,ooo
<2,000J
<3 ,283)
35 ,ooo
c20 ,oooi
1.._574 ,87 2
The City Manager and the Director of Fina nce are hereby authorized to adjust the 1975 Budget of the Ci t y of Englewood as itemized In this Resolut ,on.
ADOPTED AN O APPROVE D th is 21st day of July , 1975 .
ATTEST: Mayor
x officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, Wiiii m D. J s , ex officio City Cler -Tr urer of the
City of Eogf ""°"• COfocodo , doh ,..,, coctffy th h '"°"• "' foe •
Serles of 1975. fo I tcu , ccocote '"' c plete COOy of t oofotfon o . ~·
..... officio City Clerk-Treesur r
•.
'
• •
,
•/
•
•
•
•
I •
•
COUNCIL CH AMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLOR ADO
AUGUST 4 , 1975
REGU AR MEETI!JG :
The City Counci of the City of Englewood , Ar apahoe
Co ty , Colorado , met in regular session on August 4 , 1975 , at
7 :30 P .M.
Mayor Taylor , presiding, called the mee t ing to order .
The invocation was given by Councilman Brown . The
le e of allegiance was letl b y Mayor Taylor .
The Mayor asked for roll call . Upon the call of the
roll , the follo wing were present :
Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing , Bro wn ,
Clayton , Taylor .
Absent: one
The Mayor eclared a quorum present .
Also present were : Ci y Manager Mccown
Assistant City Manager Nollenberger
City Attorney Berardini
Director of Public Wor s aggoner
Actin Direc or of Community
Development Rom ns
D uty Ci y Clerk Joh nnisson
• • • • •
h
• •
•
0
•
Meeting of Augus t 4 , 1975
2
believes it would have to refer to discussion relating to
the total compensation package for the firemen , and who has
the authority in bargaining for this package. The City staff
has the delegated authority to do the study work on the question ,
and then the City Council has the final authority for passage in
its legislative function . So the use of the words "would not"
wo ld be correct in this case .
Councilman Mann said that in the paragraph following ,
there was a question which was deleted in the minutes , and
stated that it would be on the tape of the Council meeting .
The question asked is , "with fringe benefits , would that be
close to $20 ,000 a year ", to which Mr . Nollenberger answered
in the affirmative . Councilman Mann indicated in the top
paragraph ,of page 11 , the 40% figure should have been 37% as
established at the meeting that night , with a total salary and
fringe benefit package of $19 ,600 .
Councilman Mann further stated that he had seen the
Deputy City Clerk the following Tuesday to insure that the
portion of the Council meeting relating to the Memorandum be
strictly followed in these series of questions , because the
contracts for the City workers would be re-negotiated next year .
He rqques te d that these items be put in the previous meeting .
COUNCILM AN CLAYTOU MOVED AND COUNCILMAN MAI Sl:.CONDED
A MOTIO THAT THE APPROVAL OF THESE MINUTES BE DELAYED TO THE
MEETING OF AUGUST 18 , 1975 . Upon the call of the roll , the vote
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Mann, Clayton, Taylor .
Nays: Council M mber Sovern .
Absent: Council Memb rs Blessing, Brown.
The M yor decl red the motion carried .
yor T
to 1c
• • • • •
•
• •
•
•
•
0
•
Meeting of Au gus t 4 , 1 9 75
3
Mr . Roy Richards , 21 89 West Vassar Avenue , was
r ecognized . He asked if there was a decision made in regard
to the West Vassar Paving Dis trict situation that was presented at the last Council meeting .
City Attorney Berardini explained the results of his
study into the legal problems involved in this situation .
Mr . Richards and Mr . Berardinl discussed various
aspects of the situation . Mr . Richards stated that if this
situat i on e xisted in front of Council members ' properties ,
the problem would be quickly solved .
Mayor Taylor rebutted Mr . Richards ' accusation that
the Council is a priviledged group , and assured h imm that the
City government is working for the citizens of the City of Eng l e wood .
In answer to Mr . Richards ' question regarding how
soon a decision would be made , Mayor Taylor said that as soon
as all of the information is available to make a decision .
Councilman Sovern stated that two possible solutions •mg ~ti ~e clude that 1 . The assessment may be adjusted , 2 . That cost sharing may be used .
A discussion between Council , Mr . Richards , and City
Attorney Berardini ensued relating to property owner respon-
sibilities and municipal responsibilities.
C ~tp Manager Mccown said that the assessment district
would probably be established sometime early in 1976 and he
further e xp lained the assessment procedure .
Councilman Brown ssured Mr . Richards that something
is being done now to h 1 alleviate the problem and he would
not have to w it until nex April to get something done .
COUNCILMA JOtE MOVE AD COUNCIL MAN MANN SECONDED A
MOTION THAT CITY COU CIL GO 0 RECORD AS TRYING TO WORK WITH
THESE PEOPLE TO DETERMllE HAT CAN BE DONE IN LEADING UP TO THE
FINAL ASSE uME~T . U on th c 1 of h roll, the vote r ault d
11 follows:
Ay s : Council rs Jon ov rn. M n . Bl sin , rown, Cl y on , T ylor .
y Non
A nt: Uoo 1
T M yor cl d c
• • •
• •
-
•
•
•
•
0 I•
•
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
4
Mr . Kenneth Chandler , 6092 So . Cr estview , Littleton ,
and Mr . Larry Clark , 3385 So . Bannock Street , were recognized ,
for the purpose of a re-issuance of a liquor license as the
result of a sale from GraStoke Liquors to Back Door Discount
Liquors , Inc ., at 5450 So . Broadway .
Mr . Clark , the attorney for Mr . Chandler , presented
and explained the document s required for the re -issuance of a
license .
In response to Councilman Mann 's question regarding
the sale or lease of the property , Mr . Clark replied that this
is a sale of property . Councilman Mann qa~seioaa d the credibility
of GraStoke in the initial application and approval . He further
stated there was a great deal of controversy regarding whether
there was a need for a liquor operation at that location and the
one overriding reason why it was approved for that location was
the presumption that a Target store was going to be located in
the old Gem store .
Mr . Clark responded by saying that it was his under-
standing that business situations and the current economy are
the reason why Target has not exercised their option to move
into the old Gem store . He further stated that this meeting
tonight was not to rule on the need of a liquor store at that
location , but to determine whether the Chandle rs could have a
liquor license issued to them to operate at that location .
At the request of Mayor Taylor , City Attorney Berardini
explained that the need for a liquor license at that location is
not in question . The Council ' purpose tonight is to decide
whether the pplicants possess the r q irements to operate a
liquor outlet .
COUNCI LMAN BLES HG MOVED AND COUNCILMA SOVER SECONDED
A MOTIOt TO GRA T A CHANGE OP OWUERSHIP A l> RE -ISSUE A LIQUOR
LICEtSE AT 5450 SOUTH BROADWAY TO KEttETH E CHANDLER , ItC ., d/b/a
BACK DOOR DISCOUNT LI UORS, I C.
A iscuss1on nsu betw n Mr . Cl rk, Councilman
Clayton , an City Attorney Ber rdini r gard1ng th sale . City
A torney Ber r ini more ful y expl in d th tr nsfer or owner-
ship and re-1 auance or a lie na •
u on th c 11 or th ro th vot r a lt s follow
Ay s : Council M m rs • Sov rn, Bl 1n , T y or •
t y Council M m ra M rown, Cl yton .
Ab n on
Th M yor c t Ill t1o rr1
• t
• •
-
-
•
•
•
•
0
•
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
5
Gene Ste wa rt, 3296 So . Do wni ng Street , was
recogn i zed . He explained to Counci l that a car ran into his
home at the corner of South Downing and Eastman as the result
of an accident . He asked that the Council consider doing
s omething about putting a stop light at that intersection .
Councilman Brown said that he saw the aftermath of
the accident and stated that someone had run a red l ightaa nd
crashed into the car which subsequently crashed into the house .
He said the danger is great at that location and some better
system needs to be installed .
City Manager Mccown said that Director of Public
Works Waggoner would look into the situation and would report
back to Council by the ne x t meeting , and a copy would be sub-
mitted to Mr . Stewart .
In response to Council 's question , Mr . Stewart said
that he feels that a four -way stop at that location would be a
better system .
* * * * *
COUNCILMAN BLESSING MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO CONSIDER ITEM 6 -c -i RELATING TO CONSIDERATION OF
APPEALS ACTION IN THE SANTA FE -UNION ANNEXATION . Upon the call
of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones, Sovern , Mann , Blessing ,
Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Uays: None
Ab ent: None
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
r latin
City Attorney Bar ardini gav brief backgroun
o he S nta-Fe-Union annexation an it current statu •
COU CILMA SOVER MOVED AND COU CILMA BLESSI G SECO OED
THAT CITY COU CIL CONTI UE TO PURSUE ANNEXATION OF THE
A THE TA FE -UtION A NEXATIO AREA •
00
in
no".
n w
0 or
• •
-•
0 I•
•
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
6
whether the City was just going to continue pursuing this
annexation . Councilman Sovern stated that he worded the mot i on
in such a way as the City Attorney could pursue it through the
legal system .
Mayor Taylor pointed out that if the City Council votes
against this motion , the annexation would be dropped .
Councilman Sovern said he feels as Councilman Brown
does , that if the annexation is not carried through , other
levels of government will impose their decisions on this area .
1111!r efore , the City of Englewood should follow the annexation
through to its legal end .
Councilman Blessing said he hoped the people in the
audience understand that if the annexation is dropped , the area
would lose its fire and police protection .
Councilman Mann stated that he believes that a decision
should be made by the courts.
Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members So tvrn, Mann, Blessing.
Nays: Council Members Jones, Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Absent: None
The Mayor declared the m~tion defeated .
Councilman Jones pointed out that something shoul be
don to reverse the court ctions which are pending o r move
tha nn x d r a from th sp cial assessment district •
COUNCILMA JON S MOVED AND COUNCILMA CLAYTOI S CO DE
A OTION TO HAVE THE CITY ATTORNEY INSTRUCTED TO APPEAL THIS CASE
AND WITHDRAW FROM CASES REMOVING THE AREA FROM THE SPECIAL
AS ES MENT DISTRICTS . U on th c 11 of the roll, h vot
resulted as follow :
Ay s: Co ncU
Brown , Cl yton, T y or .
ya:
A nt:
h M yor
Jon a , Sov rn, Mann, Bl sin ,
t1on c rri
incy, e r
t t t
Ci y,
•.
• •
•
•
•
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
7
Councilman Clayton asked wh en the decision would be
effective . City Attorney Berardini stated that it would be
effective as soon as the withdrawal motion would be presented
to the court , and this would probably be done tomorrow . At
that time , n o taxes would be due and no services would be
rendered .
* * * * *
Mayor Taylor called a recess at 9 :00 P .M.
Council re -convened at 9 :15 P .M. Upon the call of
the roll , the follo win g were present :
Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing , Brown ,
Caayton , Taylor .
Absent: None
The Mayor eclared a quorum present .
* • * • •
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED
A MOTIO TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING RELATING TO AN ORDINANCE ON
FINAL READING REPEALING AND REE ~ACTING SEC TION 22 .4-5 AND 22 .4-6
ENTITLED "R-2-A AND R-2-B Residents District ". Upon the call of
the roll , th vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing ,
Brown , Clayton , T ylor .
Nay : one
r one
The Mayor the co ion c rried and the public he ring open .
'
• •
-
--
•
•
•
0
•
Meeting of August 4 , 1 975
8
would be permi tted , The people in these areas don 't want
additional apartments . She stated that in the past couple of
weeks the comment has been made about the age of o ur water
treatment plant and the City should consider the water situation
when considering rezoning and increasing population . The basic
complaint of other citizens of this area is that they do not want
to see R-2 -A zoning to now include those types of buildings which
are now permitted in R-2-B.
Charles Allum , 3072 So . Lincoln Street , was recognized ,
He asked if a business could come to the R-2 area and buy parking
for the Broadway strip . Acting Director of Community Deve l opment
Romans ans wered in the negative . She went on to state that the
citizens in this area may want to consider pursuing changing the
R-2-A area to single-family zoning .
Mrs . Oldenberg was recognized again . She stataddher
concern about parking area for the 14 -unit apartments which are
permitted in the proposed R-2 zoning .
In response to other Council questions , Acting Director
of Community Development Romans stated that 4-unit complexes can
be built without a development plan . More than than would require
a development plan .
In response to Councilman Clayton 's questions regarding
churches , Mrs . Romans said that it does not affect existing
buildings , only the new ones . It does not limit in any way
churches in this zoning area . The same restrictions do not apply
to R-1 and B-1 because the citizens , through the Planning and
Zoning Commission , have decreed it .
Councilman Clayton st a ted that he agrees with many of
the changes proposed and said they are necessary .
City Manager Mccown stated that in order to rezone an
R-2 area to an R-1 area would require going to the Planning an
Zoning Commission to have a stu y done .
Mrs . Oldenbur stat d that all the citizens in th se
areas want is to remain R-2-A nd not b included in the criteria
for R-2-B .
s 1
woul
38 5 So. L1 coln,
from City Co ncil
alon •
ion, City
1tion to h
ml Zonin
c n 1n1t;1
h
'
• •
•
•
•
•
• , .
•
Meeting of August 4 , 19 7 5
Oliver Giseburt , 3171 So . High Street , was recognized ,
He urged City Council t.hat they send back this ordinance and
have it re -written and elimin at~ngh e h •o wdtdgn g elating t o the
14 -unit apartments . It would be easier to do it this way t h an
t o vote for it and then go throug h some o ther procedure to
e liminate it .
Councilman Brown stated that he planned to move to
recommend to the Planning and Zoning Commission t o rezone this
area to R-1-C.
Oliver Giseburt said that the City Council may want to
consider other areas in this same situation .
Councilman Clayton e xpressed his concern for saving
the single -family housing unit in the City of Englewood . He
asked the City Attorney what amendment can be made to eliminate
the 14 -unit section in the proposed ordinance . City Attorney
Berardini said that it should be referred back to the Planning
and Zoning Commission with specific criteria .
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN MANN SECONDED A
MOTI ON TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING . Upon the call of the r o ll ,
th e v o t e resul t e d a s follows:
Ayes : Council Members Jones, Sovern , Mann , Bl ess ing,
Bro wn, Clayto n, T ~ylor .
Nay s : hNone
Ab sent : None
The Mayor d eclar e d the motion carrie d and the pu b l i c hear ing
c l osed. t
COUNCI LMAN SO VERN MOVED AN D COU NCILMAN MAN sr:cor 0 D A
MOTIO TO APP ROVE ORDINANCE NO. 30 , SER IES OP 1975 .
Councilman So ve rn s t ated that t her ny goo
provisions in th i s o rdinanc e and i should be pas d no and
chang m l ter . Other Council m mb rs agreed to thi .
t bl
follow
yor T ylor a id h
br.U tt to th Pl
U on he call o th roll , th vot r lte e
'
• •
,
-
•
•
•
0
•
Meeting of August 4, 1975
10
Ayes : Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing , Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None
Absent : None
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Mayor Taylor thanked those who appeared for this
public hearing and said that the suggestions they brought
forward would be submitted and they would be given eons ideration .
COUNCILMAN BROWN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN CLAYTON SECONDED
A MOTION TO HAVE THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMEND TO THE PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION TO CONSIDER CHANGING THE ZONING OF R-2-A TO
R-1-C FOR THE AREA BOUNDED BY OXFORD ON THE SOUTH , KENYON ON THE
NORTH , THE BROADWAY -LINCOLN ALLEY ON THE WEST , AND THE SHERMAN -
GRANT ALLEY ON THE EAST .
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND MAYOR TAYLOR SECONDED A
MOTI ON TO TABLE THIS MOTION INDEFINITELY . Upon the call of the
roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Mann , Blessing , Taylor .
Nays: Council Members Jones, Sovern , Brown , Clayton .
Absent: None
The Mayor eclared the motion defeated .
Councilman Mann said that it is no a goo i a o
sin le ou a s cific r a becaus it is no fair o o h r areas
which coul b arr cte •
'
• •
•
0
·, •
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
11
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED AND COUNCILMAN BLESSING
SECONDED A MOTION TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN
ORDINANCE ON FINAL READING REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTIONS
22 .4-7 AND 22 .4-8 ENTITLED "R-3-A AND R-3-B MULTI -FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT " OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE .
Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing ,
Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays: None
Absent : None
The Mayor declared the motion carried and the public hearing open .
Acting Director of Community Development Romans
explained the changes proposed for the ordinance affecting R-3-A
and R-3 -B zoning .
In answer to Council question regarding posting of a
property when a change of zoning is taking place , City Attorney
Be ear ini said that all properties must be posted notifying
resi ents of the area that changes are pending in the zoning
law. In this case, being considered the cost of the signs for
posting is going to be very substantial in the area of $4,ooo .
The City has 120 days within which to complete the rezoning.
In response to Councilman Sovern's question relating
to page 5, sub-paragraph 2 , Mrs. Romans tated that she could
not hold great concern for the p rking situation , but was more
concerne about the density stipulations .
COU CILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMA
MOTIO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. Upon th
th vot r sul ted s follows:
JONES SECONDED A
call or th roll,
Ayes: Council M mb r Jon s , Sov rn, Mann, Bles 1n ,
Brown, Clayton , Taylor .
ys: on
Tl M yor
Clo
c r1r
"
• •
•
•
-
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
12
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN JONES .
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO . 31 , SERIES OF 1975
AN OBB INANCE REPE AE ING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 22 .4-7 AND
22 .4-8 ENTITLED "R-3-A AND R-3-B MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT ", OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COMPREHENSI EE ZONING
ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO . 26 , SERIES OF 1963 , AS AMENDED)
WHEREIN SAID SECTIONS RELATE TO PERMITI'ED USES , MINIMUM AREA
OF LOT , PERMITTED DENSITY BONUS SYSTEM , MINIMUM FLOOR AREA ,
LOT COVERAGE , OPEN SPACE , LANDSCAPING , UTILITIES , MINIMUM
FRONTAGE OF LOT , MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS , MINIMUM YARD
AREAS , PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES .
(Copied in full in the Official Ordinance Book.)
COUNCILMAN JONES MOVED AID COUNCILMAN CLAYTON SECONDED
A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO . 31 , SERIES OF 1975 . Upon the
call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann, Blessing ,
Brown , Clayton, Taylor .
Nays : None
Absent :L None
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
• • • • •
Mayor Taylor called a recess at 11 :25 P .M.
Council reconvened at 11:35 P .M. Upon the call of th
roll , h ollowing r pr ent:
Tt yor
Co nc1l
T lor .
Ab n : on
Jon s , Sovern , Marn, Bl s ing , Brown ,
t;.
• •
A
• •
•
0
•
Meeting of August 4, 1975
13
Ayes: Council Members Jones, Sovern , Mann, Blessing ,
Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None
Absent: None
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
City Manager Mccown stated that the proper action at
this time would be to direct the City Attorney to draw up an
ordinance and set a public hearing .
COUNCILMAN BLESSING MOVED AND COUNCILMAN JONES SECONDED
A MOTION TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP AN ORDINANCE FOR
APPROVING REZONING OF THE WEAVER/WIEBE PROPERTY AND HAVE THE
STAFF PREPARE A STUDY ON THE REZONING AND SUBMIT IT WITH THE
ORDINANCE .
City Ma nager Mccown explained the procedure for passing
of ordinances to the audience and stated what information was
needed .
Councilman Sovern said the following information should
be available regarding this rezoning.-flood plain maps , utilities
maps , street uses, existing land uses , and any other information
which may support or not support the change of land use .
Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulte as follows:
Ay s : Council Members Jon , Sovern , Mann , Blessing ,
Brown, Clayton , Taylor .
• y Non
A n Non
Th M y o r th mo ion carri
I I I I I
•
•.
• •
-
-
-
• . .
•
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
14
Ayes : Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Bless i ng ,
Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None
Absent : None
The Mayor declared the motion carried and the public hearing
open .
Acting Director of Community Development Romans
explained the ordinance .
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED AND COUNCILMAN JONES SECONDED
A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING . Upon the call of the roll ,
the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing ,
Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None
Absent: None
The Mayor declared the motion carried and the public hearing
closed .
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN BROWN .
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO . 32, SERIES OF 1975
A ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 22 . 8 ENTITLED "DEFINITIO S", OF THE
COMPREHEIJSIVE ZONING ORDI AtlCE (ORDI ANCE NO . 26 , SERIES 0 1963 ,
AS AMENDED) BY REVISING AND AMENDING CERTAIN DEFI IT!) S CO TAI ED
IN SAID SECTION A D ADDIHG tlEW DEFINITIONS THERETO.
(Copie ln full in th Official Ordinance Book .)
COU CILMAN BROWN MOVED A D COUNCILMA
A MOTIO TO APPROVE ORDitANCE 0 . 32, SERIES 0
c ll of th roll, th lt follows:
B w ,
Th M or
Counc1
• T ylo •
y on
Ab t:
c
ra Jon , Sov rn,
c rr
• •
•.
• •
•
•
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
15
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE
REPEALING ARTICLE I AND II , (C HA~tSft 8) TITLE III, OF THE ENGLEWOOD
MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "M OVING " AND "WRECKING ". Upon the call of
the roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing ,
Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None
Absent: None
The Mayor de~dared the motion carried and the public hearing open .
Acting Director of Community De v elopment Romans explained
the ordinance and the proposed changes . She noted on page 2 and
page 11 the insurance minimums relating to death and injury to
any one person should r e ad "$~00 ,000 ". She also stated that for
a building of three stories or more that 's being moved , a $1 million
umbrella insurance policy shoudd be included . She described the
changes involved with the performance bond for both move e and the
owner .
Ernie Ryberg of Ryberg House Movers , was recognized .
He stated that all movers already carry a basic policy of
$100 000 -300 ,000 . He asked for a clarification of Section
3 -8-4(b), rel ting to the necessary foundation . He stated that
it is im ossible to .. move a masonry house into a location where
there is a complete foundation in place .
City \anager Mccown and Councilman Jones stated that
n cessary founda ion would permit th necessary variance to
com le e a job .
sho l
of
• •
I
-•
0
•
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
16
movers should have a license bond instead of a performance
bond . This would be an all-inclusive bond .
Councilman Jones answered by saying that on page 6 ,
in 3-8-7(a), other insurance bonds would include the requirement
of a license bond . He also said that the 48 -hour requirement
imposed in 3-8-lO(b) is not always feasible"°r is it safe .
Discussion between Mr . Ryberg and Council followed ,
discussing the various aspects in question in the ordinance .
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING . Upon the call of the roll ,
the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing , Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays: None
Absent: None
The Mayor declared the motion carried and the public hearing closed .
COUNCILM AN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN CLAYTON SECONDED
A MOTION TO TABLE CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE
I AND II (CHAPTER 8) TITLE III, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE
ENTITLED "M OVIN G" AND "WRE CKING", UNTIL THE COUNCIL MEETING OF
AUGUST 18, 1975 , AND DIRECT THE CITY STAFF TO MAKE THE NECESSARY
CHANGES THAT WERE CONSIDERED IN THE MEETING TONIGHT . Upon the
call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Sovern , nn , Bless1n • Brown , Clay on .
ys : Council Jon • T ylor .
A sent : Non
Th or cl r d the otion carr1 d.
I I I I I
ollowin co ic r c iv ror co , wi h no c ion .
or Zon1n 101 tin or J
Ml • or th ol1c or y 75 .
•.
• •
-
•
•
•
...
t•
•
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
17
Min utes of the Election Board meeting of July 18 , 1975 .
Minutes of the Career Service Board meeting of July 17 , 1975 .
Memorandum from the Director of Public Works to the
City Manager concerning West Harvard Avenue .
* * * * *
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVc D AllD COUNCILMAN BLESSING SECONDED
A MOTIOI TO RENEW THE 3 .2 BEER LICEJ SE FOR BOB 'S GROCERY , 3296
SOUTH WASHINGTON . Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing , Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None
Absent : None
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * *
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN CJONES SECONDED
A MOTION TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AH ORDIUANCE ON
REVISIONS I THE MASTER STREET PLAN AS PROPOSED BY THE PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION . Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing , Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
y s : None
Abs ent : None
The Mayor eel r d the motion carrie •
I I I I I
I~ ROOUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMA MA rl.
A o on AtlC
TH E.M.C.,
MAt AGER I A·
TO TEI (10)
(Co 1
B'l AUTHORITY
OROI A CE O. 3 , SERle O? 975
AME DI G c ro. 12( )(5), CllAPT
BY EXT DI 0 THE AMOUNT OF TI M
DER A RITT DECISIO 0
SS DAY' •
in r 11 in h or 1c1
• •
•
•
-
•
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
18
'1.J COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AIW COUNCILMAN BLESSING SECONDED
A MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NO . 33 , SERIES OF 1975 . Upon the
call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Jones , Sover n , Mann , Blessing ,
Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None
Absent: one
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * *
City Manager Mccown introduced a Bill for an Ordinance
relating to the intergovernmental agreement with the City of
Littleton for a fire training facility .
City Manager Mccown related the changes which have
been negotiated in a meeting with Littleton .
1 . Littleton will convey ownership on one -half of the property to Englewood .
2 . A special account will be established at the
Littleton ational Bank and will be known as the "Dist iict,
En lewood , Littleton Account", and will be handled by the City
of Littleton .
3 . A committee will be established with th following
re resentation -2 from Eng ewoo , 2 from Littleton , nd one from
th Lit leton Fire District .
I TH ODUCED AS A BILL BY COU!CILMA SOVERJ
A BILL FOR
ncy
y • •
•
0 I • -
Meeting of August 4, 1 9 75
1 9
City Manager Mccown stated that the emer g ency clause
wa s i n t he Bill for an Ordinance in order that the project can
ge t go ing as quickly as pos s ible.
Upon t h e call of the r o ll, the vote re s ulted as follow s :
Ay es : Co u nc il Membe r s Jone s, So v e r n , Man n, Br own , Clayton , Tay lor .
Nays : Council Member Blessing .
Absent : None
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Because of Councilman Blessing 's n ay v ote , the eme r g e ncy
feature is dropped from the Bill for an Or d i nance .
• • • • •
RESOLUTION NO . 3b , SERIES OF 1975
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLOS! G ON LABOR DAY OF SOUTH BROADWAY
FBOM FLOYD TO GIRARD FOR PURPOSES OF A STREET DANCE .
(Copied in full in the Official Resol bbion Book .)
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUiWILMA CLAYTON SECONDED
A MOTIOH TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO . 36 , SERIES OF 1975 . Upon the
call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Jones , Sovern , M nn , Blessing , Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nay s : on
Ab s nt: on
Th Mayo r cl r d th mo i o n c rrie •
• • • • •
n l 1n ti O 1c
ATiot OF
U T
A D
. )
•.
• •
-•
0 I•
•
Meeting of August 4, 1975
20
COUNCILMAN BLESSING MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN
SECONDED A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO . 37 , SERIES OF
1975 . Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members 3oDern , Mann , Blessing , Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : Council Member Jones .
Absent : None
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
• • • • •
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN BLESSING SECONDED
A MOTION TO DEFER CONSIDERATION OF ITEM 7 B RELATING TO A REPORT
FROM THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER CONCERNING THE DOG COMMITTEE 'S
RECOMMENDATIONS .
Councilman Mann stated that he agrees with the report
that has been submitted by this conunittee .
Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing ,
Brown , Clayton , Taylor.
Nays : None
A bsent: None
The May or decl red the mo ion c rried .
r or
ro 1 •
y :
or
• • • • •
Mccown repor
Dir ctor o
Jo
1o c rr
on th d n rou
Uc Work •
ov rn . M nn
id wa lks
a1n •
• •
I
•
•
•
0
•
... .
Meeting of August 4 , 1975
21
Councilman Jones stated that he had talked with Mrs .
Rakestraw who had been at the last Council meeting , in regard
to the situation that exists on West Harvard in Paving District
No . 22 . She had asked Councilman Jones if the residents on West
Harvard can be given the same consideration as the homeowners on West Vassar .
Director of Public Works Waggoner indicated that he
would check out the situation that exists at that location .
Mayor Taylor stated that the citizens of that area
are only interested in getting a retaining wall installed so
it would alleviate this situation .
* * * * *
City Manager Mccown presented the minutes of the special
Water and Sewer Board meeting held on July 31 , 1975 . The meeting
was called to discuss the pending lawsuit filed by the Dravo
Corporation against Amax concerning the cost overruns on the Meadw w Creek Dam .
Two recommendations were made by the Englewood Water
and Sewer Board :t:nacl.the City Council hire an outside counsel
to determin the extent or the City 's liability in the existing agreement with Amax .
1..~~ the attorney determines that a liability does exist,
that we go ahead and proceed with the case with Amax through the court system .
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN BROWN SECOUDED A
MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF THE WATER AND SEWER BOARD SPECIAL MEETING OF JULY 31 , 1975 .
ncilman Mann ked wh t the procedure is o select
n el . Councilman Jones t ted th t it would be our own attorney .
draw
of Community
he u ies to
n Co ncil C yton n
on 1b111 y for in h1
• •
-
•
•
•
•
• I•
•
" .
Meeting of August 4, 1975
22
Councilman Clayton stated that if this position is
to be deleted , the time to do &u:ctr is now when it is vacant .
~
Councilman Sovern stated that a decision such as this
should be made at a time other than at one o 'clock in the
morning when more time can be spent . A decision such as this
should be made with~background of good sound reasoning.
* * * * *
COUNCILMAN BLESSING MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO APPROVE A PROCLAMATION DECLARING SEPTEMBER 8 , 1975 AS
NATIONAL CANCER DAY . Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Blessing , Brown, Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None
Absent: None
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * *
COUNCILMAN BLESSING MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO ADJOURN . Upon the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones, Sovern , Mann, Blessing , Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
t ays: None
Absent: None
The Mayor eclared the motion carried
at 1:15 A.M • d th meeting w e adjourned
o p ij y cl y Clerk
•.
• •
,
-
,.--.
Moved Secon4ea
>C
y
•
• •
ROU. CALL
~
e
Jones
Sovern II' ,
V.ann v'
Bless irur v
in-own
Clavton
Mayor Tavlor
N ay Abstain
v
v', ...
v
./
.•• .u-1~....e... ~ v.> /11....d ct ~
ttZI '...<-d~·t luv~-~~
µ ~ li.-~ ~ t
~, 'l--....
(YI 1• I I
~
d'--''' (I -
...,
Absent
I
/
~ 7'L
I
~ (.,_ ~ ',,,._.( I
• •
•
•
•, •
ROLL CALL
~ ~( ,____(" ~"Z.
~ .,,,, .. _ -·-
Je
dA..V-~ ~ 4.,,£.J
Moved Seconaed
~ Nay Abstain Absen t
><' Jones v
Sovern v'
Mann V'
Ble ssing ,/
llrown v'
y Clavton v'
MAvor Tavlor ./
(._r:;""'l
I o I
t4 L U.A' CL, "~f ~ J ~J ~ /~.h
~~r-
VI (.J
• •
-
r
L-
~
.,---
-
1=--I
. ~ 1,., •
SeconOed
•
0
• ·.
ROLL CALL
Ave
T Jones
SOve rn--•ann
F 1 ess'-
Brown --
Clavton I
uo~~o r Wl -;;.;;;,,.,,,_or I I
• .
I•
. ..
Nav Abstain A'h•ent -I --1 ----I -.....,
I I -, -
..
• •
-
J.t<'l'.0 r
( ,.,,,_
0
•
ROU CALL
)-..,__ /-t
Moved Secon Oed fcye
Jones (
x Sovern )
r:.a.nn I
Hl "SS1n<i" I
"' tlrown J
Clavton l
!.favor Tavlor \
(--Y,.. -t..-~
1~ ~~M ,._
i.U,J .• d ... Uvj~ v.... 17 7
tf,<. tu 1~7S-
{/
I ~ AT.fJ~-K--
..,,..... r ·~"' ~' ~-;L tr
f-1r ~··~7'-~ /
(J..uC~· /!-t ··~ ~,
. .., • I ( .... t~, u.}r;....
II) ,£1 . (., a
Nay
-:...;
tu<-L
I
7
.........
wM
h -,
Abstain Absent
~t-'-~r----~ .,.( lo
,,._ IL 3
?.,.,,. /I~ ,;.
.u-f d,,t:..eL ~~4
,C-r.:i..
4 ,.. lc:M-~ rr
~:<A .
/,LL (,.,.
,,, -:;>
-1
A-<..J' A ~
; n ~
'
• •
•
0 t•
•
. .
: ....
ROLL CALL
Moved Secon4e0 Aye Nay Abstain Absen t
/; ' . t;fJ.v Ut.-1.:~ •
/t:Jl4A • ( u Lt~.,_ u ct/t µ~ ~,,,(_ ~i-../.., ~
..,... • L< -{ tn--Jt... '-1 ~
~;-µA-(!_ <-f~i -~~ ;! ]-// -{.... ;! '), c3
{.
),f "'' "'?
_,........., f It:" ~ CM~'-""J
~ "' 1-. ~· ... -· i ;;
~•A ·~/ ,d.;. .. I' ~r) f
• ",,/µ,,,/. / ,I".
I ~.( ......
l 11i • I -t:. ~
. .,. ~ ~
/ ,~~
• I .,/1 4
• •
yr II -,, ' / .,,. ~ f
'I
•
•
~ , . . '.
Moved Seconaed
lutt(l i -07 -c
.AYl-c...
(JI tC. -(!_.l t -')"""'
l l rr ".J ty-<-'i.\ ~
•
0 I•
•
ROU CALL
Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Jones
Sovern
lh>nn
Bles sil1ll
Br o'WTl
Clavton
Mavor Tavlor
. I ~ b -1 I -1 ~ ~ "i.-
"'
t _.d:"
w/ '1lA._._.I ~ IA>-&u
~ 1A )77 ;e:_ ;tu..'~! j)£A4J~ ~
1 -µ
t~. -"
,,. ....... r ""
/ .A • {j)l 1 . i 4f -
h ,:( "'
K ,;. d,
( 1 h'
1.J ' U.rt
,.., /.~~-~ #
""""" '-ti.,#,
.I' ~-
•, -i "-
~ -I j..(. ~ _,,.~ ..
,_ ~
.
~
*, / /,.
·1 , ~-
'
'
• •
•
0
•
. .
--=----=-=-------
·'"f •"
ROLL CALL
Moved Sectm4el1 Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Jones
Sovern
Mann
Blessing
Brown
Clavton
MB.vo r Tavlor
~ 71
~ ..... <U!.. t,J.-d UuA tf,,,</ /1->t.. ~f ~ r-
"1..-.... 1~~~4 ~ '~'"'-'---·ft ~ If t:lf't-·
~ V ( V-~ r C-U-<--,,t_ f-w..-_ A ~
1~~f--I 1-o ~ /l~ fu I '~ 4 11~
~·-~ +o !-c.L.
II 1J /' , ) (,,V't-~ ~ ~lo I ~1-f'~
/<.1t I -~ ~
~
I Ill -::
'-1 • "-""' ,I
rl< t "'
,_ rL-< vJt..
I .; / • •
. ,
-
0 -
-..
~-=----
ROLL CALL
Moved Se cona ea Aye Nay Abstain Absen t
Jones f
"'-<'." Sovern I
/" lV.ann I , BleSSl.Illl f
or own \...
Clavton I
MB.vor Tavlor r
•
,
•
-0 I•
•
ROLL CALL
Mo ved Se conCea A..ve Nay Abstain Absent
Jones ,/
)ot""" o:>overn ,/
,JC::-Mann ,/ -Ble ss~ ./
.t:ll'own ../
Clavton ./
u""O r Tavlor o/
'
H'1 /. -
• •
,
-
0 , .
•
c ~!d ~d ed ,(I ~,.,_ t~1 L...__/ ~
Aye Nay Abstain Absen t
Jones ~/
Sovern J' /
M N v
Bl e ssf?i<7 -:7
~ Brown 1/
~ Clavton \7
llAVor Tavlor ,/
(...#'{ID 1..> -~t.. J~ ~,u 'i. c;. u l ~ 1l,, -,. _
~~~
•
• • •
-•.
0 I•
•
..
~
~.
:-
ROLL CALL
Lt )~ /)1-1 ~ ~{)
Moved Seconoea Aye Nay Abstain Absen t
Jones ~
Sovern / -
Mann /
..... Bless-fna /
Brown ,,,.,
)(" Clavton " MAvor Tavlor ,/
j
l>4 "L-,4.1. -" ..t. ,,( ti
I~ ,..)1 ~ t''I -1 -\-r. I!
l)G.,....... 1 -d • 1
I"
rj r ~ l~f 6.Jc..
/.1),1
-:z:; ......... "'"' (i>A ?
,-( c• (
..
•
• • •
• -
0
•
'·
ROLL CALL
~ ~~@;
Moved Sectmded Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Jones v
Sovern v'
~ NIB.llil v
Blessing ,/
Brown v
Clavton o/
x-Mavor Tavlor II'
• •
f
• -
0
•
-• .
. -• l ••
' ~• I ' ,.
ROLL CALL
~l
Moved Seconded Aye Nav Abstai n Absent
Jones "" Sovern /
Mann /
lo<" Blessirui /
Brown ./
-;? Clavt on /
IMavor Tav l or .!'
'
" L.vl--'t-,41--•• ..t..A. ({
1:. 1)• I.; ,, ~ "-f' .. f /'~ 1
~~ ()~ '-"!,... f rl
I'
~r-~ ,,L.u-~ l~f 6.-'1-
LU I~ "'--!-
•
-~ ~
,-f
CJ( -.... ,,, ""
• •
,
•
•,
0
•
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded A.ve Nay Abstain Absen t
y Jones -
Sovern -x MB.nn -Bless1rur --Brown --Clavton --Mayor Tavlor --
• •
-
0 , .
•
(,
~ ---..... -_., •.
ROLL CALL
~(
I
Mo ved Second ed .A.ve Na:v Abstain Absent
x Jones --Sovern --IVllll1Il --BlessiilJl --Br own -"' Clavton --MB.vo r Tav l or --
'
•
• •
t
-
Moved Second ed
•
•
•
Jones
sovern
Mll lI1
Hless:uur
Brown
Clayton
0
•
ROLL CALL
./'" If~ 3 :::>
Aye
{
)
I
\
I
I
Maver Tavlor }
-.
Nay Abstain Absen t
• •
,
-
Mo ved Seconded
.,.
.--
A
•
•
0
•
ROLL CALL
s;-~
Aye
Jones t
, overn '-
\llAT'IT'I /
Bl ess1?Ul /
Brown I
Clavton " MAvor Tavlor I
Nay Abstain
t ' h
Absent
•.
'
• •
-
0 , •
•
-
~ Gr°J"-AYe A
. ~ ~ ~, .
Moved ~ed Nav7 Abstain Ab ent
' J Jones -Sovern -Mann ~ ,,... Bless1ruz -lJrown -Clayton /
MRvo r Ta vlor -
/d u <-
-Uo T
• •
• -
0 t•
•
.....----!!!!!~"""""""'~--~:;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;::;;;;:;::~::a;:=~:~ -----~ --.:'---_ _..._ -.
• ""'!!!!. ~
ROLL CALL
3<°..__
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Abstain Absent
./ Jones /
~ ;:,overn r
N'.ann /'
Bles sirur ---Brown --Clavton ,..
Mayo r Tavlor -
'
• •
• .·-~ -
I•
•
(.
ROLL CALL
Moved Seeond ea Aye Nay Abstain Absent
.)e" Jones -
Sovern -11.ann -Bless1nll -Brown ...-
>< Clavton ,
Maver Tavlor
• •
•
•
--a
ROU CALL
Moved Secom!ed Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Jones <
Sovern I
Mann I
../ Bless:uuz I .,.,,. tll"OWil ......
Clavton /
Mayor Tavlor 7
•
• • •
•
0 -
ROLL CALL
Moved se condeO A..ve Nay Abs t ain Ab sent
J ones (
...... -SOve rn I
Mann I
Ble s sing \.
13rown I
~ Clayton {
MA v or Tavlor r
I /L
Ir. • ,I
.,
•
• • •
.. -
ROU CALL
I
Moved ~ed A.ve Nay Abstain Absent
Jones
Sovern
MRnn
Bless'lna
lll'Olll'l
Clavton
MA-var Tav l or
~ ~ J.A f o--J ._f p ~ '-
6-u;-/ I ~~1-~
& ,~ ( . ,
> I
~6~~v kt.A<~~
... ,, ( ( . ' > •• 'I I ,_
• •
-
0
·, •
_w a
ROLL CALL
Moved -a A..ve Nay Abstain Absen t
Jones /
;c-Sovern ........
v-N..ann I
Blessl.nll I
Brown \
Clayton ' Mavo r Tavlor I
• •
0
•
-
ROU CALL
~~ iV ~ ~ /ll1f; ~
Moved ~ed A..ve Nay Abstain Absent
Jones K
Sovern <:.,
}( Mi\nn I
Bless1ruz J
Brown I
x Clavton ' Mayor Tavlor v
..
•
• • •
--•.
0 ,.
·, -
--
I
Nav Abstain AYe --d Moved Absent
I Jones l /
)( ;;:,vvern -.
Mann I -/C VJ..eSS1.111< I
orOWil " 1 Clavton I -I \ j 1 Ma.vor Tavlor .L
~
I -
'
•
• • •
~f ~ 0..A -/..., f-1
C)/(A.w 0.;a f'tA-ID~
Moved -d
x Jones
..,,--sc>vern
IJlKill
Blessinll
-Sr own
Clayton
0
•
. =--....... ----=-~:;:: --
Rott CALL
--... ~
Aye Nav Abstain
/
\
J
l
'\
7
M,.vor Tavlor l"
•.
----
Absen t
'
• •
-. ,. -
ROLL CALL
Abt i Absent Moved --d Aye Nay s a n --Jones " ~vern /
>< M!lllll \..
'.>£'" Blessirur I
or own \
Clayton l
Mayor Tavlor '
ex . ~
~·l-I 1 ~Yo< )•
t,.( .. :µ.LlJ. ~-.-.,v 1 ~ ,-
~ ( <i..v ",, / ?--;.."" -
u 'tA...I w~ -~ (.. ,. . ..,
qi' -1-1
(ik.u....,-/1, I .,u_ ..,
~
7/; ,,__
• •
• -
0 I•
•
ROLL CALL
f)
Moved ---A._ve Nav Abstain Absent
Jones .........
-,/' Sovern v
)<" • MRnn v
l'IT es s l.rul -,,...--
Brown ,/
Clavton ,//
MB.vor Tavlor v
L -.. _.:; f < -~ v-'•
I
• •
---------·
•.
0 I • -
------~-------------
RO!.L CALL
Moved -d Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Jones /
Sovern l
~ Mann I
Blessing I
Brown \
~ Clayton I
Mavo r Tavlor l
'
•
• • •
•
• -• .
• I •
•
ROLL CALL
I
Moved Se ·-Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Jones
Sovern
M!iilil
Blessinll
l:lrOW!l
'>.::'.' Clavton
MHvOr Tavlor
'
• •
,
-0
•
ROLL CALL
Moved --d Aye Nay Abstain Absent ~
Jones )(
L., sovern (
Mllllil ' y Blessf na I
.DrOWTl I
Clavton 1
Y.avor Tavlor I
•
• • •
• -
0 I~
•
ROU. CALL
1 f:>
Moved --d Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Jones I v Sovern }
M8Ilil (
'-" B1essina " / Brown (
Clavton \
MBvor Tavl o r I
1~ /,//JI) -
• •
'
• -
•
ROLL CALL
Moved ---Aye Nay Abstain Absent ~
Jones
sovern
Mann
Blessirur
Brown
Clavton
11".ay or Tavlor
• •
•.
0
•
-
ROU. CALL ~61;.'~1 ~I~ fl4/IMP ffeft 11
Moved --~ve Nav Abstain Abse nt
v Jones !
v !':riv em I
,;1 Mf'\') ' Bles s1rul I
Brown
Clavton
Maver Tavlor '
'
~ r ,,,. / /(
f..)t. "IA t;t..
1A I), /IV'-' ~~
I-( y,...;l t. {,..
--
• •
• -
I• -
ROLL CALL
' Moved ~ed A..ve Nay Abstain Absen t
Jones (
sovern J
v Mann /
Blessina ' ..K. Brown I
Clavton I
Navor Tavlor I
~"" Ill -~
/< ~ r9 ~
7 I ~
AM-,/ "~
• •
•
-
0 I •
•
-
ROLL CALL
M:>ved --d A.ve Nav Abstain Absent
Jones
Sovern
l'1R In
Rl essTna
lil'Own
Clavton
MAv or Tavlor
•
• • •
•
• .
• l •
•
-------
ROLL CALL
Moved ~ed A.ve NB.Y Abstain Absent
Jones I
"" sovern )
Mann -J
k !Hess1-nll I
Brown l
Clavton 1
lllavor Tavlor ~
'
•
•
• • •
,
•
-• • I• •
... -
ROU CALL
/,'IS:-
Moved Seconl!ed Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Jones
~ :;overn
11.a.nn
~ Bless111ll
fil'OWII
Clayton
Mavor Tavlor
• •
•
-
(
•
0 I• -
COUNClL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
JULY 21 , 1975
1 A
REGULAR Mi:;ETIN :
The City Co ncil of the City of Englewood, Arapahoe
oun y , Colora o , met in regular session on July 21 , 1975, a
:3 0 P .M.
Mayor Tay or , presiding , called the meeting to order.
The invocation was given by Councilman David Clayton.
The pledge of allegiance w s led by Mayor Taylor .
The Mayor ask d for roll call . Upon the call of the
roll , the fo lowing were present :
Council Members Jones , So vern , Mann , Clayton , Tay lor .
Abse t : Council Members Blessing , Brown .
The Mayor declared a quorum present .
A o pr sen w re : City Manager Mccown
Assistant City Manager Nollenberger
City Attorney Berardini
Director of Finance James
Director of P blic orks Waggoner
Director of Utilitie Carr 1
y Ci y C er~ Johan is on
• • • •
~ou1 c LM ~ CL YTON
x OTIO.~ TO EXCUSE COU CILMl::.
o ..
ot.nc i lman C
pa ed
on c
y
y 0
d fo o
. c on ,
.·-~
•.
• •
-,. -
----~--...,,-.-,-. -----~~
2
COUN CI LMAN MAN N MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MIN UTES OF THE MEETING OF JULY 7, 1975.
Upo n the call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Memb ers Jones , So vern , Mann, Clayton,
Taylor.
Nays: None
Absent: Coun cil Members Blessing, Brown.
The Mayor declar ed the motion carried.
• • • • •
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN CLAYTON SECONDED
A MOTION TO CONSIDER ITEM 5-C-i RELATING TO THE SANTA FE-UNION
ANNEXATION. Upon the call of the roll , the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sove rn, Mann, Clayton,
Taylor.
Nays: None
Absent: Counc il Members Blessing , Brown .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
City Attorney Berardini explained t he current status
of the litigation regarding the Santa Fe-Union annexation . He
said that the court has not yet ruled on the City 's request to
have a new trial . Upon the court decision , the City then has
30 days wit hin which to file its appeal .
Mayor Taylor stat d tha h would like to have a ful
Co ncil to decide on this ma ter.
COU CILMA SOVER MOVED A 0 COU!CILMA? MANN SECO!OED A
MOTION TO TABLE CO SIDERATIO OF THE SANTA FE-U IO AN EXATIO
UNTIL THE co CIL MEET! 0 OP AUGUST • 1975. Upon th call of
h roll, vot result d as ro lows:
t..y s: Co ncil M era on a, Sovern, Mann , Clayto •
Taylor.
ya: on
sen Co nc1 era Hi Bro
Th yor cl t ot1 c r1
I I • I
.·.~
..
• •
•
0
•
3
Mr . Roy Richards , 2189 West Vassar Avenue , was
r~cogniz~d . Mr . Richards c ented on the Paving District
I . ~2 affectin Vassar Aven e . He sai tha when Paving
vl. r let. ,w . .:::2 was pror use , they were all for it . Th y
tt1f; treet . n b i ding the street , tney find that
+.,lie ir r i veway s are n<"'w r,ree fee hi r.er than the street,
kn he improvemen tha i bein• bu!lt is -f no hel t them .
He for the City 's he in resolvin this i uation .
COUtJCIL.~AN JONE oiOVE A:;D COUi~CILMAI CLAY ON SECONDED
A MOTIO.l TO HAVE THE MATTER RE.LATI!lG TO PAVI G I STRICT W . 22 ,
P 0 TI LARLY WEST VASSAR AVE:P E , BE RE EARCHED BY THE CITY
AT -P'rnY ':'O DETERMINE WHA-: =.A.t:s TH!:: CI':'Y Cx. PROVIDE FOR THE.
SLLE FUtJDING OF THIS ~TREE': rnPROVEMEl'T PROJ · C INVOLI UG
.!IE DRIVEW y CHANGES , ..,o THA': THE CITY cou:JcI::.. .oiAY HA E MORE
.r:Fc RMA I'IO. FOR THEI? DE :::: N . THE REPORT SHOULD Br:. A RITTL.
REP0RT . U on he call cf tht r0l , he vote resu ted as fol o~-:
Ay s : Council ~e ers Jones , over1 , an , Clayton ,
av or .
.Jay. : No e
b er.t: o •• cl nters ~ essing , Br wn .
Th M yor dee red the co ion arr1ed .
Co
ct,e r ee to
t at thi si ion o ts o v
o the ev lopn nt of the area .
Co~ncilman l yton said lat Co~ncil might con i er
~ i~ 1P con in ency f nd to ta~ c re of s~tu io s 1 e
t 1
• • •
• •
-•
0 -
~-------~----~-=-
4
Mayor Taylor answered her questions relating to the
correspondence he had sent te -her .
* * * * *
The following communications were received for the
~ecord, with no action .
Minutes of the Career Service Board meeting of
June 19, 1975.
Minutes of t he Parks and Recreation Commission meeting
o f June 12, 1975 .
Councilman Mann asked that the representative from
Troop 263 explain the plans for the historical trail along the
City Ditch . Mr. Robert Webster , 1210 West Rad cliff was recognized.
He is the Scoutmaster of Troop 263 . He stated that he had contacted
other Boy Scout troops in Englewo od , telling them of the project ,
and found no interest .
Councilman Mann said that he had talked with others who
were interested and gave the names to Mr . Webster .
Mr. Webster explained that the trail was a Centennial-
Bi -Centennial project, and the plan was to submit this to the
National Boy Scouts of America for consideration for part of the
National Trails system. There would be five in the Denver Metro
area. The State Centennial-Bi-Centennial Committee plans to
designate these as historical trails also .
Councilman Clayton asked what would happen to the
historical trails if the City Ditch were closed in the future.
He said that this is a complicated consideration beca se the
future of the City Ditch is ncertain.
Mr . ebster said tha the
changed if there wa s a chan in
designat io cou d be
s of h Ci y itch.
wri in
his
th si
y th Ci
0
Co unci man Sovern a A
y A torn y.
a nt a re ort i
ro n for th
Co· nci .... wo d at
n
• •
-
•
•
•
I• -
Taylor .
Ayes : Council Members Jones , Sovern, Mann , Clayton ,
l~ays : 1 one
Absent: Council Members Blessing , Brown .
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO TABLE ITEM 4-C RELATING TO CONSIDERATION OF A REQUES~
BY BOY SCOUT TROOP #263 TO USE THE CITY DITCH RIGHT OF WAY FOR A
WILDERNESS TRAIL FOR THE CENTENNIAL -BI -CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION AND
TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO GIVE A LEGAL OPINION ON THIS
SITUATIOl. Upoo the call of the roll , the vote resulted as
follows :
Taylor .
Ayes : Council Membe rs Jones , Sovern , Mann , Clayton ,
ays : I one
Tay lor .
A sen Council Memb ers Jones , Sovern , Mann , Clayton ,
7he Mayor declared the motion carried .
Ret rning to the agenda , the following items were
received ~or t e record.
Minutes of the Library Board meeting of July 8, 1975 .
Fir.anci l report for the month of June, 1975.
R_por from he Assistant City Manager t o the City
Man ger concern!n expLnd i res by the City for Co nci .olemb er s '
s o ses .
"1a .a ~ oi.cern
Co~or do St. ~e
t t t t
o Librarie City
he Library ro
• •
•
•
•
I• -
Meeting of July 21 , 1975
6
an opportunity to negotiate more fully with the Coors
corporation .
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN MANN SECONDED
A MOTION TO RATIFY THE LEASE/PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH COORS FOR
THE BOREAS PASS WATER RIGHTS AND EXTEND THE LEASE FOR 90 DAYS
FROM THIS DATE AND PRESENT IT TO THE WATER AND SEWER BOARD FOR
FURTHER CONSIDERATION . Upon the call of the roll, the vote
resulted as foll ows :
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sovern , Mann, Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays: None
Absent: Council Members Blessing , Brown .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
• • • • •
City Manager Mccown presented a recommendation from
the Board of Adjustment and Appeals to permit an encroachment
for a retaining wall at the proper y at 4661 South Bannock.
Mr. Mccown said that this is similar to other requests received
in that area , as result of a sidewalk district .
COUNCIU~At CLAYTON MOVED A D
A MOTION TO GRANT A VARI ANCE TO PERMIT
RETAINING WALL AT THE PROPERTY AT 46 61
call of the roll, the vote resulted a
COU NCILMAN JONES SECONDED
AN ENCROACH.ME T OF A
SOUTH BANNOCK. Upon the
follows:
Aye : Council M mb r Jone , Sovern , Mann, Cl yton,
Taylor .
y :s: o e
A Co ell M Bl sin , Bro n .
T M yor
• •
• •
•
0 I~
•
~~------------------~-
1•.\::'t::l._i_LJ Ul uUiY ~J., 1-':Jf'.>
7
City Manager Mccown emphasized that this is a City
Courcil unction and that t e selection shoul be made y
hem .
Councilman Mann asked if it was feasible for tne
vi izens Bu get Committee to act as the selection gro p . City
1·1cCo wr, said tnat because of time limitations , he
omrni tee would not be appropriate to act on this.
COU GILMAN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAl MA IJ SECO DE
A MO rm TO APPOINT THREE COUNCILME! TO INTERVIEW AND Si:. ECT
A!l AU I'I'CR , l'i!TH THE J?INAL SELECTI01~ ':'O BE RATIFIED BY ?HE
Ft.:LL CI':'Y COUNCI-L . Upon the ca 1 of the ro 1 , he vote res ted c.s follows:
Ayes:
'Iaylo r.
Nays :
Abs en
'In e ii y r e., ....
c
~·v n to a loca
Vo
I I!., nd C
:.o
Council Memb ers Jones , overn, Ma n , "layt n ,
None
Cot:nci :'1ernbers Bles ine;, Brown .
rea whe motion carried .
s a ed that consideration sho be
or ~he cor.ir.i1ttee were Co ncilmen Sovern ,
I I I I
1rector of Fi~anc
9 5
wr.1ch
w •• !.c.
• •
-
•
•
0 I•
•
8
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN CLAYTON SECONDED
A MOTION ·ro APPROVE ORDINANG1i: NO. 29 , SERIES OF 1975. Upon the
call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Taylor. Ayes: Council Members Jones, Sovern, Mann , Clayton,
Nays: None
Absent: Council Members Blessing, Brown.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
• • • • •
City Attorney Berardini presented a Bill for an
Ordinance which would permit the City Manager to have ten (10)
bus iness days in which to render a written decision in an
employee grievance. The City Manager currently has five (5)
calendar days within which to consider an em loyee grievance,
and the City Manager feels that ten business days would permit
more time to fully investigate the employee grievance .
Ci ty At torney Berardini pointed o t that in line 6 of
the paragraph D, should have added after the word and number 10,
the word "b siness", and should then read, "the City Manager
shall render a decision within ten (10) business days from
receipt of employee's grievance.
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN MANN.
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINAN CE AMENDING SECTION 12(d) (5), CHAPTER 10, TimLE V,
OF THE 1969 E .M.C., BY EXTENDING THE AMOUNT OP TIME IN WHICH
THE CITY MANAGE HA S TO RENDER A RITTEN DECIS ON 0 AN E.MP LO YI::E
RIEVANCE TO TE. ( 0) BUSINESS DAYS .
MOVED AND COUNCIU4A SOVERN SECOND
BILL FOR A ORDINANCE RELATING TO ~HE
AGE •s DECISIO EMPLOYEE GRIEVA 'CES . Upo n th ca l
vot r aul ed a follows:
ea: Counc1· rs Jones, Sov rn, nn, c yton, Tay or.
' ya: on
Ab1 n rs Bleaa1n ro n.
.i.h ayor dee r d th otion carr1
• I • •
•.
'
• •
-
•
•
•
0 I•
•
~~etinc o r J u ly 21 , 1975
9
Ci ty Att o rney Berardini reported on the law suit
tro bh y ~rs . Weis challenging the methods o f a portioning
co t-ln special d i s trict s . The City , whi c h init i a ly won te
c ase , was a pealed by Mrs . Weist . She has since wi hdrawn ner
~y~eal to tl e court ecision .
* * * * *
City Manage r Mcco wn reported on the progress of the
inte rgovernmental contract with Littleton on the fire training
fac ility . He said that there were several chan es made in the
contrac which he was not pleased with .
First , t he committ e e ma keu p was dis roportionate in
its r re s entation , in that Englewood has two represen atives ,
itt eton woul have wo representatives , and the Litt eton
Fire Jistric would have two representatives .
Second , the land ownership agreement was no
atisfact.ory .
Thi rd, there is a disa reenent on th way the fund
ho 1 be set u for the pr o ject .
lhere is a meetin~ next Th rsday between the two
ci ies to iron ou t difference wr.1ch exis
• • • • •
in
•.
• •
,
l • -
10
Ayes: Council Members Jones, Sovern, Mann , Clayton ,
Taylo r.
Nays: None
Abse nt: Council Members Blessing, Brown.
The Mayo r declared the motion carried.
In answer to a question relating to what the BOR is,
City Manager Mccown stated that it is an abbreviation for the
Bureau of Outdoor Recreation.
• • • • •
City Manager Mccown presented the Memorandum of
Understanding between the Englewood Firefighters Association
and the City , and he recommended that the City Council ratify
the mem orandum. He said that the Memorandum of Understanding
makes provision for a 4 to 5~ increase in fringe benefits .
There wi l be no salary increa se in January, bu t the salary
negotiation could be reopened in April if the City has funds
available for a salary increase. At that time , a survey wou ld
e condu cted to determine what the average salary and benefit
packages were in a 3-community area including Denver , Aurora,
and Littleton .
In response to Councilman Clayton 's question , Cityj
Manager Mccown stated that the word "~ " would refer to the
City Council and the City Council<.:;Ould not e delegating
uthority to the City staff.
In response to Councilman Mann's question, As s istant
City Manager Nollenberger said that the a verage salary for a
City fireman is approximately $14 ,000 plus fringe benefits .
Councilman Mann asked why Englewood uses Denver in its
consideration of the average w ge nd benefit package 1n its
survey . City M nager Mccown said that in pr vious agreements ,
the stipulation w s made that Denver be incl ded. If a chan e
in cities wo ld be de in the survey, it wou d be a ne otiated
item.
nn a k d what wo ld ppen if th surv y
in curr nt wage and b n fit evela. Ci y
that er c rrent con 1t1on w can't
ben r1t1.
Inane r to Co nc1lman Jon 1 1 •• ion re ardin th
co or fri b n fits to th Cit , Aaeiatant City na r
, __
• •
•
•
•
0
•
11
No llenberger said that there was a 4% increase in the fringe
benefi !"-and ha fringe benefi s are approximately O" o:: d worke r'. s alary .
d c i s i o11
c ~ ::.a ·ee
:.nro ·r.
"'aylor .
Tt, Mayor
Co ncilman Clayton pointe out that if here is no
or agreement made between the City and the variou
orga izations , the voters will have the final authority
referen um to decide on an impasse .
CO UNCILMAN JON ES MOVED AND COU~CILMAN CLAYTON SECONDED
TO RATIFY THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTAN ING BETWEE THE
F REFIGHTERS ASSOCIAT ON A D ~HE CITY OF cNGLEWO D 1~75 . Upon the call of the ro 1 , t e vote resulted
Ay s: Co ncil Members Jones , Sovern , Ma nn , Clayton ,
l'ays: ·~one
b en Co ncil 1ember B essing , Brown .
clared the motion carried .
City fl: nag r Mc own s a e hat the impasse wnich
c rren ly exi ts bet een the City an~ the Police Benefit
A o ci a i on ha s gor e to the areer ~rv1c Board for et rmina ion .
ctp o1nt
vac c y . 01.
E. l a c .
• • • • •
cCown said that the Co
an ~ewer Bo rd to
n h b .·ece v ct ,
he Cit.
ting
:en
A
..
• •
•
•
<.
•·--,.._••o --..,. ..... -.., ........ , ..-_,,I ..I
12
Taylor.
Ayes: Council Members Jones, Sovern, Mann, Clayton,
Nays: None
Absent: Council Members Blessing , Brown.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
• • • • •
Director of Utilities Carroll outlined the background
and need for a qontingency plan for rationing water. He said
that conditions have existed in the past where it has been
necessary to ration water. He recommended that the City Council
Gonsider a set of criteria that the Utilities Department can use
to impose water restrictions. He recommended that the raw water
reservoir trigger level be established at 15 feet , and that the
treated water reservoir trigger level be established at 9 feet.
Councilman Mann asked Director of Utilities Carroll
if he was asking for authority to use these levels as trigger
levels to institute water restrictions. Mr. Carroll answered
in the affirmative. Councilman Mann said that he doesn't see
why this authority needs to be given as the City Council members
are usually available. Director of Utilities Carroll said that
he is just desirous of having a firm policy at which point water
restrictions could be instituted. The Council and the City
Manager would be responsible for implementing any action .
Councilman Clayton said that he would like to see a
3-member committee composed of two Councilmen and the City
Manager to make interim decisions in emergency ituations until
full Council can act at a scheduled Council meeting.
In response to Councilman Jones ' question, City A torney
id ha a commi ee or h Counci cannot ac on the
matt rs .
. yor Taylor said th t his opinion is hat the Co ncil
he City a aff to mak d ciaions, an th
i not ivin away it a · hority or tonor.iy.
cr1 eria a w 1ch poin th City a af f know
•
-
.;
(
•
•
•
0 -
13
Councilman Sovern s a ed that the City Council is :n a po~ition of neglec if ·they do no permit the City
emrloye~s o react in emerGency si uations . The City ouncil
19 n no pos ion to reac quickly enough , because a quorum is
no always ~uaranteed .
Counc ilman Mann said he does not agree with the
criteria es ablished in this case .
Councilman Sovern said that we may not agree wi h the
s~ecific criteria, but the principal of giving the City staff
aoility to react is necessary .
Mayor Taylor sai his philosophy of Council action
-~ tha they are the policy-making body and t hat they req ire
ne staff to administer he policy which th e y legislate .
Ci y Attorney Berar ini clarified his earlier s
regarding de egation of au hori y o the City Council , in
cornr.iitt e of he o ncil ca ino ac as a legislative b y ,
h a q or m of the Co nc t exist b fore legislati~n
enacted .
tement
tha a
t
an
Upon tne call of he ro_l , the vo e or1 ti.e .otion
re~· lted as follow
Aye.,: Co ncil Me!"'bers Mann , Clayt n .
iJay : Co:rnci Members Jone overn , .=ay or .
A c:ent: 'o nc1 j. rr.ber" Slessing , Brown .
T. Mayor the
or. o.: rr., •:an , C 't "•
y o ..
rowr .
ti
•
•.
'
• •
,
•
•
•
0 I• -
1 4
City Ma nager Mccown reported on the housing project
for the elderly . The City has applied to the Housing and Urban
DevelopmPr.t as the developer, which HUD has approved. The Housin~ Authority has proposed that revenue bonds be issued by
t he it y to provide funds for the project . In HUD's approval, ~y required a unit contract rental of $220 . At the current
p ric e , the sale of the bonds would not be permitted on today's
market. The Housing Authority is investigating an alternative.
The Hous ing Aut hority has made a proposal which would include the
Housing Authority allocating $70,000 of its own funds to the
architectural bid provided that the City would allocate 35,000
for t he architectural bid, and that the City would waive use
taxes and water.tap fees and other building fees required for '
the project.
COUNCILMAN MAN N MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECOND ED A
MOTION THAT THE CITY WAIVE USE TAXES , ALL BUILDING PERMIT FEES ,
UTILITY TAP FEES, CITY USE TAXES , AND THAT STATE USE TA XE S BE
RETURNED TO THE PROJECT AND THAT THE CITY ALLOCATE AN ADDITIONAL
$35,000 FOR THE COST OF THE BIDDING FOR THE ELDERLY HOUSING
PROJECT . Upo n the call of the r o ll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Sovern, Mann , Clayton,
Taylor .
Nays: None
Absent: Council embers Blessing, Brown .
The Mayor eclared the motio n carried .
• • • • •
May o r Tay l or thank e d t h ose who were at t he Co uncil
m eting t onigh f o r the nice turno
M yor Tay or said h a h
rumo r s ha t h ere ia oin to b a
f e es fo r h e people in En lewood .
o b a
ould
I I I I I
ld like to s q elc h the
d eus ris e in the water
t h r wa a o 1
nd he pro ram
y zoning or d 1 a ce •
• • • •
•
-
,
-
0
•
.1.5
r o ncilman Sov ern said that the City Council would
be les r, than honest if it s ai d that t here was no water increase
e ing considered for the fut re . A rate increa se may be needed
ln he fu ur e in order t o cover costs .
* * * * *
Ruth Parrant , 3c00 o . Clarkson was recognized . She
heard that a $ 5 .00 increase pe r month was b eing planned and
n er s0urce was from a councilman .
Councilman Clayton ex lained the special stud y the
Ci y had done i~ relation to tne water situation . It involved
t ~e possi ility.of f ure rate incre as es.
* * * * *
Marti~ Latnrop was r ecogn iz ed , and he fur her iPcassed
t .e wa r ! a t ion .
n g r o s .
h t
Mayor Ta;lor re i Jed peo le that rumors can be
* * * * *
• * •
•
this r oble ce 11c
r .
e
•.
..:.~--
• •
-
,
-
1 6
Mrs . Vardeman was recognized. She as ke d what the
re nt is in the government-sponso red elde rly housing pr o ject.
Mayo r Tay lor said that it is 25% of th e ind iv idual 's monthly
income . He als o said that there i s a long waiting l ist fo r
oc cupancy .
* * * * *
Liz Richards, 2189 West Vassar , was recognized . She
asked if the funds that were being r e -allocated from the
No rthwest Greenbelt would mean that there would be a loss o f
equipment and services for the greenbelt. City Manag er Mccown
said that there would be n o loss of equipment as the playground
equipme nt would. soon be in place . He said that the re -allocation
was because of a savings realized . She also asked who wa s
resp onsible for putting up the signs irecting traff ic from the
st reets involved in the Paving District. Cit y Manage r Mcco wn
said that this is the contractor's responsibili y .
* * * * *
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCII.MAN CLAYTON SECONDED
A MOTION TO ADJOURN . Upon the call of the rol , he vote
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Counci Members Jones , Sovern , Mann , Clayton ,
Taylor.
Nays: None
Absent: Council Members Blessing, Brown .
The Mayor declared the motion carried and the m eting was adjo rned
a 0 :05 P .M.
•
• •
'
-•,
0
•
,
I
,--
/~'"r/ 7:~
/Jl~-:.-
Moved -SecoMeO
~
L_
1 Jone s
Aye Nay
.<Ji vern
, I
Abstain
1
Absen t
I
I ~ -
L___
-
:a.nn
Blessing
I --
'----
I~
!3rown
I
Clavton
Mavor Tavl
I
I o r I l
-
I !
• •
-
•
:..
Yl,, . . . / ROLL CALL
I n r r..u--u ~~'i-""4--='TO~· t:=/_=t:::4;;r;t;i:z::1,~,~~< -,.J~-r-> ~F--~ fl ~.TJ 'J_ -/lot:JtY"fs <Q R;• y.;f#-•-7'ii • r ~ ~
Moved SeconOeO Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Jones v
sovern ./
.lo.-11.ann -17
~ Blessirur v
Brown v ..... Clavton 7
Mavor Tavlor ./'
'
p lo I I
;.o I 1rJ.Jz ( /
w v ~f...-(;;. iJ
4(~ I Uy l L~
"--
I ~,I ,,:.c, ' ~!."'--
~ 4.-J-
/f_,1. 0 4 i
It ilf.-t • '' ,I. b '
• • •
•
-
• I •
•
,
---==-=--~-----___:_---=------~--
ROLL CALL
Moved Se con ~ed
Jones
Sovern
.Miiill1
Blessing
Brown
Clavton
"'MaYor Tavlor
j:'LJ '-( U ~ #IU b :l
;).If W v, 'SS
c.. • -Iv
0 -A
I ( ' , I
Aye
I
Nay Abstain
-,
.·.~
Absent
• •
-•.
0 I• -
,
4
ROU. CALL
Moved Se con~ed Aye Nay Abstai n Absen t
Jones
~vern
MAnn
Blessifl2
-grown
Clavton
MRvor Tavlor
CJ r, -
I
/I. 0"'-'~f ~
/J' I~ ~
µ/~ .../.-
>~0
~
04 01 " ~
I ~'1 I 7i
.. I' -
Jd
• •
-• •
,
ROLL CALL .. ~·-~
Moved Secon~ed Aye Nay Abstain Absent
x--Jones .,/
Sovern ,/
y-Mann v'
l:lless1ng .,.--
Brown ,/
Clavton .,/
Mayor Tavlor "'
'
i · 1 (jv
I' ... ;;. ..., ,
,.... . ._
().-
t-r
• •
I
-•.
• I•
•
-
ROLL CALL
Moved Secon~ed e Nay Abstain Absent
Jones
&>vern
Mann
Blessing
Brown
Clavton
Mave r Tavlor
/}1H-1v1J -'
~ ~~ kHA ~ ~/l]~ ~
~v~ llf1~-(. d
JJ ~ JI y~·/f , IM» ~u.r
-r; w e--/' l ~\__ t:f.vu.kh .ll
11f ~f A. I , (L ~ ..
1[:-• ..J I """" ~~ ..,,... /{(µ,/ f
v~· 1
• •
•
•
• -• .
• •
e Nay Abstain Absent
Jones v
-7 Sovern v
Mllllil v
y lnessing t/
Bro'l/Il .,;
Clavton v
lMYor Tavlor /
{!.t....A<(TO/'..J -j • f;;; ~'L-.......-4 .,Af...J_~ ...-v-faf'VJAZ_./
~-~ ~ ~ b..-t,Q..L.<# 4 L ,u._±
~ l f-. ~~
£ .c.-I ii=. ~ AA ;Vv-f 1 ~
"i--1 ~HA-'I c;,G f
h r.
I~
(£.. µ IT 1' /.J /,. ; ,, ' 1 ~ ,.,,('£.;<
-,
fl r/1 l / I 6./,_,1..1 1 IJ.,.<.-r;(. -
r
) I ...,.4
• •
,
-
•
•
0 I•
•
ROLL CALL
Moved SeconOed
Jones
.Sovern
!.ilinn
Bless1 nu
trown
Clavton
"!JiiVor Tavlor
r
,A
~~h--s-J'-t~
l &~-t::::. ,..
J ~
},1 ....-t .IA
) 11
/. ,,_, ~ ~t
,/,;i-/"""' {u u. ~
A.
1
Ay e Nav
~
7J ~u
''--f
v ~vt. ,
/ti._.,(..
~
t I
Abstain Absen t
'
4 £,lr-~
E: ~~
• •
-•.
• •
,
ROLL CALL
Moved Se conded Aye Nay Abstain Absen t
J one s 7
~ So vern "' t!..ann ./
>,L Bless'n " ./
Br own ,/
Clavton --:/
r.navo r Tavlor v
'
• •
-
,
•
•
•
•
APPLICANT:
Kenneth E. Chandler
5450 So. Broadway
Englewood, Color do
•
0 t• -
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
LIQUOR AND J.2 BEER OUTLETS
d/b/a Back Door Discount liquors, Inc.
"'YPE OF ACT ION REQUESTED:
Change of owners~ip from Gra oke liquors
POLICE AND FB REPO .
O~ OORI RIO YEARS,
~
~ .
'
-I
• •
I
•
•
•
-
,
-··1 ...J.1 -· t:t·-··---'_...,,,, __ . __ _
Persona l History for Licensing
License Applied For
'lr /3 2 Beer _~X..._ __ Recreation Fac1l1ty _____ H al Ther py _____ Other _____ _
SECTION
Social Security NO. 507-26-9956
Home Address 6092 S011th Crestvj ew St Littleton Colorado 80120
firH t ' Cny State Zip
Date of B1nh October 11, l q 28 Plac ('If 8 rt ___ B_a_t_l __ C_r"'"e_e_k_,_, _N_e_b_r_a_s_k_a ______ _
H ogh 5' 7"1/2we1gh 160 ColOf of Eyes Hazel __ Co1or of Hair Brown Race_W __ Sex Male
C11zen US __ Y.::..::e=.s_-!Olher ______ Marrtal Status. Mamed __ X __ Single ___ Divorced ___ _
Name of Spouse or Ex Spouse _F_a_u_s_t_i_n_a_F_. _C_h_a_n_d_l_e ___________________ _
Stre t
Colorado
Stet
80 120
Zll>
Children _...;J:::..e:ca::.nm=-==a.:.r-=i'-"e~-----------------Age _ _..;2;;..;2 _________ _
_ _,,,_....._zi.._ ____________________ Age_--'"-"----------
__ C~a=r"'-"'o~l=-~A~n~n,!._ ________________ Age_-..:1~7=-----------
------------------------Age ___________ _
Mjnpjp K Chandler
Addr ss ________________ Address Madison, Nebraska 6 748
Bro /Sisters
.._~ ............... u...a...,.._. ........ ~~~9l)Q3
Prath r
• •
• -
0 t•
•
,
Addresses -past 5 years
From Se'1t 196Z to fres ent Street 6092 So Crestlriew St .City Ii ttl etan State Calo M onth · Yea r
Fro m to Street City State M onth Yea r
From to Street City Sta t e M onth .y .. ,
Frorr to Street C ity State N on ., .. ,
From 0 Stre t City State
llllonth ....
Have you f'V r been com11cted of a felony or m1sdemeanorle elude minor traffic v io ls ions) Yes __ No __ x_
If yes g1v dat .places .natur · ol offens , penalty or punishment __________________ _
c arac r Ref r nces List Thr (3)
1. Name
Occupation
2
A. r
Oecupah n
3
Ai>dr
Occ
• •
•
•
•
0
•
,
"
SE€TI01~ II
Health Therapy Appl icants only .
E 'wood Bus iness where you will be employed __ ""'N'""•-..,-.---------------------
Address ____________________ Owners Name ________________ _
Acer d 1ted School of Massage Attended ·
N•m• StrMl St a te
From _______ to ________ Number of Hours Traini ng Received ___________ _
All prev ious employment 1n Health Therapy Establishments
1.Name From to
Adelress Owners Name
2 Name From to
Address Own rs Name
3. ame From 0
Address Own rs Name
O •r s Statement
I have Hammed the above named applicant and find the applicant to be 1n good h allh
S1gned-----------------~Date------------------
Address--------------------------
SECTION ID
All applicant Notary Public
ATE 0 COl.ORA 0
COU Y OF<~...-~c.L•u~-.~~~~~~----~K~e~n~n.....,e~t~b.._[i;...--i.C~h~eanu.iod~l~·~r._ ______ ee lng
and say : that h It th apphe1nt abo named ; that 1141
and
•
• •
-
•
•
•
•
• I•
•
,
Police' Action . Englewood Police Department
Yes v No ____ _ fi ngerprints and Photo Taken
Taken By ,.".Z L,.1._. 5:.-l e~---' ~ i
Sent to C .B .l. _____ F.B .l. _____ Other ____ _
Comments : d ~
S1gned---.,.,.---,.--::-:-:.,------------1twe1u1at "I Off le.e r
Return to Rev nue Division
R v nue Div1ston ~
Approv d __ _,,,.._L__ _____ Oiaapprov d ________ _
Comm nts ·
•.
• •
•
0 I• -
,
p .)1£0n .i I I ll~l o1 I for L IC t :n -;inq
Lict:. sc Applied For /
Li • /3 2 Bee r--'V'--___ Rcc reat ion Fa ci l i ty ______ H calth Th cra py _____ Other _____ _
SE CT ION I
Name ~.571 &0 ~ ('7d11...0,,..:: 0~ Socia l Securi ty NO. &;/-.Ao -/fZo
Home Addr es sL"z~ . C12 cS ...,.,/E.N :5-r ~/7f.(Cfo,,·v G .zo . 8'01;..o
S t re e l J City St•t • _\ Zi p
Date of8 or t h .____fa,ve :J.o /z ~ Pl ace of B orth 5~ ..... .r.:-..e .... -O s;G ~~ ~K. 7
Hc ognl 5 .) i We 1gh l /-.;4: Color of Fye s·~1 v/.J Color of Ha 1rdt6'v;?J Rac e W Sex i'6J F
C oto le>n , US ~ Ot h er Marita l Stat us . Married />1 S in gl e ____ Divorced ___ _
Name o' Spouse c• Ex So0us ~r/,/~rtf/ £. ~,,hti&Z....
C.,,ESr 'E•"' $ .. hY-7".L.r7'?:>.,./ ...:::!;..J..~-::::::..__: ' St •t• l op
~-----------~ Age -----------~
Parent-; Fa ther .11""1l' atf-f/!°:17' J'-11~~-----M others N :tme __ ..;:sd ...... =.::c;..:t!'.=....:.;~c::w..:.E...;:J,._ ____ _
J ,;)... ,s;, ~.,~.,.,.
Addr ~s /../SfrJ~~-tJ/l:.,.....t.U.~~-----Addrcss ________________ _
Broth r!> IS1<-tcrs
<ir s
i m
• •
•
•
-
0
•
,
Addresses -past S years
From~ t.z 10 it-l~""7 Street 6,;V, ~· ~r0~ ~-.,. C1tyh r:?.rE;,v,J State a~.
onth • , • .,
, rom to
Month · Ye•r
Street City State
From to Street City State
M onth -Yea r
Fron-to Street City Stz te
M onth ·Teer
From to Street C ity Sta·e
Monlh ·Year
Ha e ~ou ever been conv.cted of 3 felony or misdemeanor I exclude minor traffic v •o lat1ons) Yes __ "lo ~
ff yes give dates . places . nature of offense pena lly or p u n 1st-iment
Charactr>r References
Name ~E::>
Address~/ 0 r:;-, Al 7'
Addre !I
Occup hem
•.
• •
'
0 I •
•
<. ,
S ECflO r~ II
HcaW Therapy Applicants only.
·lew ood Busineso; w here you w ill be employPd--...,,.-------------------------N•m•
Address-------------------~-Owners Name ------------------
Accredited School of Massage Attended :
Name Slreet State
From o --------Number of Hours Train i ng Received ____________ _
Al I prev 1,...u empto11 " Prapy Establishments
Na me -------·--------------Fr om __________ to __________ _
Addres s ____________________ Own~rs N ame __________________ _
2Name ____________________ _ From __________ tO -----------
Ad dress--------------------Own rs Na me _________________ _
3 Na c---------------------Fr om_ 0-----------
Addr SS-----------------Owner Narl'e-------------------
t6rs Stat m nt
I hav 1tam1ned t e abov n med apphc nt a nd find th a hcant to bf! in good health
Sign d __________________ oatc ·--------------------
l ;.; -..:•·~ ---------------------------
-=-=--===
SFCTIO m
A ll pl c n t o• r P ublic
TA.Tr 0
v
•
COLO AOO ,._
(_
to r "" t , po
nd II
Faus ina F. Chandl r
I'd I y lie nt a o
nd tll I II
named , th t
•
-
•
•
..
0 t •
•
,
Pol11 :n ' ct 10 11 · t-n 91 n w oou t'o11ct" '" pnrrrncn1
ringerp ri nt s and P hOl<J Takt·ri Yt1~ -~-·-N,, ------·
l;.ken By ,&;t?,,,
) Sent to C B .1 _____ F B I ______ Other _____ _
Comme nt s . o ,/< -t-o
01~1s1on
Cm .
•.
• •
•
•
•
I• -
,
'V"J VI •1!:11~1\.WYVVU o"-VIVfdUV
Application for Business Licens e
Lie '3 App lied tor . __ l..P~/':'-'-~ __ h_...,_~-------==-=---'h=--:-iU./_~_' ____ _
ame of Business Back Door Discount Lictuors , Inc. a trade name of :
IU:NNETH E. CHANDLER, INC.
Typ of Bu siness Re tail Liqui~->2..1.Jl!..i....t:__ ________ _a Colorado corporation
Business Address Street 5450 south Broadway License NO _ __.....i...::~~"-"----
C1ty--Engl ewood State Colorado
Applicant's Name KENNETH E . UM DLER~ lNC,
Applicant 's Address Street ---~-0'""'9'""'2_S"-t5""0~t:"'f'l_-_;:C-"r_::e:...:s:...;t'-v'--'i=-e::..w;.;__::..S-=t..o.·--
Littl eton Colo Ci ty ___________ Stat e •
Business Phone 79 8-.5202 Home Phone 798-4933
Drive rs License NO H 131 G20 Colo. Social Security NO
507-26-995 6
MERCHANDISING LICENS ES :
Auction Houses · Resident Au ctioneers -$5 .00 per day . S20 .oo per year
Itinerant Au ct 1one rs · S 10 00 per day . $ 30 00 per yea r
2 Christmas Tr Dealers· $10 00 per selling season
HEALTH and SAFETY LICENSES
Con al seen and Rest Home -S 10 00 per ear
2 Poh and Detective S rv1ces ( privat firms)-$10 00 per year
DI R -SELL! UCE SES
Date of Issue
Issuing Clerk
Application Fee ---------
License Fee
ALL LICENSES ARE
RENEWABLE ON JANUARY 1st
ch dd1t1ona l d ,
• •
-•
• •
,
STA J:MEN T BY APPLICANT
I h .:: received and re ad the Munici pal Code of the-C ity of Englewood wh ich applies to the license tor w hich
I •m >pplylog I'"''"'""' l he oodo . ""' I wHI oo mpl7 :""'''°"'=..C'__.('\
S1 gned~C ,~
Date _____ J_u_l_y_l_5_, _1_9_7_5 ________ _
(
•
• •
-
,
• •
~~
ROCKY MOUNTAIN PRESTRESS, Inc. I l~tJI\"" 3890 SOUTH FEDERAL BOU LEVARD 6Y ei.!J 't::::J P. 0 . BOX 1434 • ENG LEWOOD, CO LO RADO BOllO
PHONE 303·789-2575
!rs. Dus t y Chandler
6092 o. Cr es view St.
Littleton, Colorado 0120
Dea Ir . Chandler:
April 21, 1975
You hav been w1th Roe y Moun a]n Pr estre s, Tnc. appro imatelv five
and one half vear.. Durin11 tha ti you have held various ecretanal
po i~1on an<l are now ~xecutive Secre ary to he Pres1den
loy at Rody lo un
\ u a\ ht'en an
J• a ind d e n
•.
• •
I
-
I
(
•
·. •
. e:r-:.._t, E. C!":c · ·::..:.:-anC Faus .. i~a F. C~:;.;.~:c: .· . ._vc bet:.:1 O'-r ; . .c!t:,; . ..o:~
--.~C<-.April 19G3:
:: !:::: c~r o;::>inio:-1. ~:.ct tr.~ ... : :.-.oral ch: .. ·uc:er ar.~ ~o--.~s:y ~:e c.~cve re-
prc~c:i.
~\·::;-: ::ie .:ast 12 ~lc..:r.£ ,NZ .·.::.ve :,.~:>v.r~ :.1c~ o:i:= :·.:.:: ~ ... •!·:~n er.= ca!'\
onl1 _.._ / that wa c.:...! ~c::~:.ate to :-.c:.ve :::o,,;;sc ?-o;i:(; c..: :r • ..::::;::s e:.::
:-;c gt:bor_.
•
• •
•
-
I
(
• •
April 18, 19 5
' TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
1 have known Kenneth E. Chandler since 1945 and his wife, Faustina F.
Chandler since 1959. Their moral character and integrity is of the highest
1 vel.
Without reservation I can state that they would be an asse to and
honorable ci izcns of any communi y.
It would be my pleasure to an wer ny inquiries regarding these fin
;>eople .
J mes S. Brun r ?'10 Flint Wa\·
,Alroomfield, Colo.
,
0020
•
'
• •
I
-
I
(
---------.
• •
June 19, 1975
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I have worked wfth and have known Kenneth E. Chandler since October
1970. He fulfilled his areas of responsibility wi h enthusiasm and
success and I have always found him to be a man of the highest
integrity and moral character.
If I can give you any further information, please let me know.
Sincerely, '•A ~ t!~l..../1/.-:f (Jl.p
Richard A. Field
33 4 W. Layton
Denver, Colorado
•,
• •
•
•
'
(
I
•
•
-
STATE OF COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
APPLICATION FOR A LIQUOR LICENSE
THIS APP LICATION MUST BE Fl LEDWITH THE COLORADO OfiP!\RTMENT OF REVENUE .
ST ATE CAPITOL ANNEX BUILDING . 1375 SHERMAN ST REET . DENVER . COLORADO
80203 13031 825·9061 ext 411 NO LI CENSE WILL BE GRANTED UNTIL THE APPLICA
T ION HAS BEEN APPROVED av THE LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY .
IMPOR T ANT : CHECK THE APPROPR IATE BO X FOR THE TYPE OF LICENSE (S) BEING APP LIED FOR . THIS IS AN ORIGINA L APP LICATICN
ANO A COPY MUST BE KEPT IN YOUR FILES FOR REFERENCE WHEN APPLYIN G FOR RENEWAL LICENSES .
X RETA IL LI Q UOR STORE LICENSE
LIQU OR LICENSED DRUG ST ORE LICENSE
BEER AND WINE LI CENSE
BEE R. WINE AND L IQUOR LICENSE
IHOTEL . RE STAURANT)
CLUB LIQU OR ICENSE
EXTE NDED HOURS LICENSE (HOTEL &
RE ST AURANT ONLY )
BREWERY !BEER) LICENSE·
"MAY RE OUIRE BONO
FEE S S0 .00
FEE S 50.00
FEES 2S .OO
FEES 2S 00
FEE S 25 00
FEE S 200.00
FEE S 250.00
L; WINERY LICE NSE (S 10,000 BOND REQ UIRED FEE S 250 00
'""'WHOLESALE BEER LICENSE " FEES SOO 00
WHO LESALE LIQUOR LICENSE ($10 .000 BOND
REQUIRED ) FEE SIOOO CO
DISTILLERY LICENSE ($10 .000 BONO REQUIRED ) FEE SIOOO 00
RECTIF IE R LIC ENSE (SI0.000 BONO RE'lUI RED ) FEE SIOOO 00
PUBLIC TRANSPORTATIO N LI CE NS !PLANE . BUS CARI
•S2500E A
IMPORTER 'S LIQUOR LICENSE FEES 750 00
THE UNOEllSIGNfO Hff(ty MAKI!! AP'l'llCATION fOll A STATE LICENSI! AS INDICATED AIOVE. u..oR THE ,llOYISION$ Of CH. 75. AJ!T ~. CIS. 1063
A5 AMfHDIED. AND fOll THAT 'UllPOR MAKES THE FOi.LOWiNG ANSWlllS TO THE 0Uf$TIONS CONTAINED IN THIS Al'l'l lCATION EYEIY A,,llC AllE
QUESTION MUST If ANSWHEO. ANY MUI ...-1 Oii 5TATEIMNT MADE IY THE AHllCANT CONSTITUTES l'ftlWY AND THE 'fl$0N MAK I
SUCH FAl.Sf STATtMfNT SUIJECTS ANY llC!NSI! ISSO!D HEHIN TO IEVOCATION.
KENNETH f: ~!'."'!We:-:!ri:a ""'"tmM
1• _ o1 Apptlcenl(aJ • Back Door Discount Liquors, Inc. (Kenneth E. Chandler and
F~u_sJ;J,na ... F. Ch11 nd ~r.L __ ··--1 .. -..T • .,,_No 794-1756
, ,, .. N -Ba.ck Door Discount Liquors, Inc.
' Adchu of pl-to be I-EXACT LOCATION Of -ISES MUST IE GIVEN c. .. "'"' ond ....,,.._ ....... -"II If pl-1o be loeo.,...j
lota!M "'• -., rw ._,.,.......,.•lo "'-IWo to 91 .. '""'end...-. . ..,.'-...., bl«~ r.,...., of,..,_ ........ l«•lod
5450 ...South llroadway
Engl wood,
......._ • e
o..-..... _
• c_,., Ar.iapaho
..
1 c ..
attached)
.., .. ... ·-· ..
.c ........
x
x
x
II
J 0
•.
'
• •
-
,,
•
I•
•
...
• "J' • v ry tnM ••• Of ioe,.,,
I "' "' <0<-"'"" ho,.. • f•n •n<·•I '"''"''• evldon<ed .,1ho• bt loon• <>' eq ·•Y _ .. n. ·• t
' •• -·•d• 1• t ,.,..,., " Y'" ""• """"' on~ odd ·"M' •"" ,_. • ol ,...., '"'•n<" ·""""
·• "' ., r ,,...,. of •• u. ,.,.h " lnvenle><y , fu rnoture, '"'""' ond ,._.,, Ye•
No X
x '-•
t s ·•• ....
-
ll Ar11 'f04J or do 'f°" ef'\ptoy • le9J.,.r.d ,._.,m.c•t m the Stete of ColOt"edo?
It If lHl "l'l'llCANl IS .. N INOIVIOU"l ..,._ ) tnd (b)
I -
•• (No-)
11 -gt<ol"""'--''"-""'""'....,. __ _.,, __
(el -
YU..
No x
NO lt If YU . LIClHSI 14\IMl(I
NO X If YU. LIClNSI NUMIH
--,; (Oete ol 1.nlll
I ....
(Oete of ...... )
(0 ......... )
--
1975
........
"-.. Colorado
.. .. ..
c
Uttl ton . .. ,,
"
"
•
• •
(
•
•
22 -*' '°" ""'-.,."""-••Ing"'" i.u.ino .. ? o....... . .. ~un.E!: .... ~3 !. 1 975
~1 •i '11 .,....i.....i. "-..._., __ .. S.tQkes. & .CQmpany ....................... .
23 Gi..,. tM nemn of thrM re1pona1b~ char.ct.r referenc.s who un vouch fOf your quali f ication• e nd de11rebili ty " • lkenled operetot. thow.n9 the
rwmber of yeera you hew known Heh.
... Coloi;.ado
si ...
12
No YHA Known James.. P. Stockham 6.0 .9.8 .. So •.... :we.st.v.iew ... Littlaton.
Nome Add..u City
James S. Bruner • ...... ?~.9 ... :f~.~~-~---~8.-Y .... ~---~ .. Br<?.9.~fi~.1.9 ................... g.C>!or.ad _o_ ..
Nome Add,... O ty
30
. .... 4 1/2
No Yff'1 lnown Richard A •.. field .33.6.4. W. •.... La.y.to.n ......... Denv.er .•.... ··-··-·-···········-C.alorado .. .
Name Addrett City St1te
2• l •1t below yout" Dul.ineH or tl4ftPloV"*'' record for the pat five .,......
flr"' -Add<-Y°"' Pooltk>n 0-Employed tmmod'o,. Supetv_.
American Bldrs. ~:;~a:· ~t;;: ... :.~ .. '. . .C.\H!.t.Q~er .Svc_ •. 'Mg-r .... 6J.73. to _12 /74 Floyd Bert sch
Rocky Mt. Prestres.s 3900 .So .•. dFe.deral .... As.tlt.-Prad .Co.ntrol. Mgr .10/70 to 6/7 3 ~~c~~~~d En gl.ewoo , Colo.
Pennsylvan ia I ns . Co. 1'6-· FH1more·········-Saleeman ········· ··lllft9 .'t-o 1-0170 Walt~r Nayl'.or
If T>l lS .. PPllCATION IS fOll "ewe ~'{~ilt..1, l(,Q~'QU'5TIONS 25 THIOUGH 32.
A dub m .. na 1 cor pont:on wh.ch hat bffn Incorporated for not t.u ftit•n five ., .. n , and which h•• Md • membe~tp thtit "'-• pe 6"'" for •
penod of •' I.au flve .,..,..., e nd ~.ch. fOf fi ve ye•n, h•• been t+. owr\4tr , '9 ..... or occ.upent of •n ett•bli1hmef'lt oper•ted so4ely for ~c:t• of n•t1on.S,
t0<11I, fr •teMal, ptt d~ pohtk•I, Of eth .. hc ntture, but not for pecvnlitr; 91ln, •nd the p<oPfrty, H well H the adv•"' ... ' ~ wtu<h be lon9 to ""'9mb9.rt
Al•o a dub mey be • c:o.-por •• on which ii • reoutefty dt•rte red brench or lodge or <M,pter of • nationel orgen1wt.on, whteh hu ~•ted "o ly f0t
ob1Kft of a ~tr~tt ot fratetn..I or091•nu t1on or todety, but not for pK\H'lltry .. in,
2 . St o,. .,._. ond ,..-. ol pnnclool offbn of &aid oppl--"'-• "''"' "'9 off.c. held by ..0. of ••od ,,..._
,
/
"""N"' •
,, ......
-
. ....
D•te of 16.rtft __ , ____ , __
I --.. -------
,_
. ....
.. • ..
'
• •
•
0 -
If TH! APPLICA NT IS A MAN UFACTURER O R WHOl!SAl ER , AN SWER QUES TIO NS l3 IHIOUGH 37
3S Doe• •ny of th9 e ppltc.afttt, Of tnY of tke .,.,,...,, •• Of eny officer, 0 1rect0f Of stod-.ho def of 1e1d app4k ant, if It k I COtpot•·
h on, ..... ""• d"ect "' Ind red fonencl e l lntemt on the bu>•n•M of ,.Uong melt, v.no oo •P"'"'°"' lo-et reta il?. -Yet No
36 0-a ny .,.,_ Of -ny n any w•Y lnteretted on ony othe• ..,.,.,., t.-ewetY Of d"tollery, o< ony 1ete ol loq-etl• lel>-
menf ow-n . e 1thet ......., °" 1ndire<tly , in whole Of 1n pe rt, the bu1td '"1 °" Pftf" .... to be 0tc.upted by the bwiN'U OI .. ,
It al..,., fOf w koch tlve appl •-10< llcenM ;, mado? l• ,..__
37 Oooo ony -· pan -~do t Of penon on any woy .,,.,.,,,.d Ml eny ....... •ln•ory, ..,._ty, doll ol le!Y , Of •• ool ,
loqvor Ol••bl•lwnen•. n... ..,, dorect Of lndorect fonanct<ll lnte"'" on the bu>•""' I• whoch rh;. ol)l)llca t -IO< Iott-II ..... ? If 10, ......... ocvlen __ ,.. No
ITAft 0# c()U)fllJ)O
Aup&hoe ...
. ..• beone i., .,. r ... 1 dofy ......... 11 1 .. -11. •-....i .. ,., -he .._ .pp1....,1 .... ,,_.,, .,, .... .-_...-pat••""" ..... he .... -............. ....-""" -he~· freaident.D.ire~tor er•> .... _ ..... -...i ................... ondrhi __ ................... _...._.....,. ........ _ .. _._ ................ -
P"'' ....... ted by ltto ..... Doi*'-.. -in ,__ -
.. ha
15th .., ..
J u ly _
•
n ~h1 Oct. 17,"71
.......... ~ ......... .,,,.........-. ....,.,,
'-_ ......... _______ ... ------------
~ .......
• •
-
-
(
•
•
0
•
KENNETH E. CHANDLER, INC . dba
Back Door Discount Liquors, Inc.
Kenneth E. Chandler and Faustina F. Chandler
14.
15.
5.
(Yee) Stokes and Co. present holder and propoaed "trasnferor"
of the aubject liquor licenae will hold an 18 month promissory
note from applicant corporation in approximate amount of
$12,500.00 for payment of purchase price of fixtures and stock inventory upon the premises.
Jame a Stokes Real Estate 333 Logan Street
Denver , Colorado Charles Cohen Sales and Develop. " ..
William Grant " .. " "
Stokes & Company " " " " Graatoke, Inc. " .. .. ..
Belokea Liaited .. .. " .. Parcnership
Leaae inatr\lllent (attached) dated July 1, 1975 granta S year
atate with S year renewal option into applicant and fr011
preaent licniae holder and landlord. Said lease ia to b
effective by ita teraa for occupancy, rental payment• etc.)
upon applican '• approval for lie na .
•.
•
-
-. .. ,.
•
0
•
Ju ly 10, l'J7'1
!ess rs : J:im '?s Sto':cs
'h ·i r Pf' T.ohf'n
Stok s .:on :1 r: .. ,:i-?f:a n'
·33~ L0gar ~trc:>et
Denver, Lal r~~o
•'•
Re : CrastokP Liquors Tranfi fc
ICenw>th E. Chanl1 1 er
Gen lcr.i cn:
In furt hc:>r-mc of our '"CP t inr,
re snle and ] e::iec:> trJ . 1 r lon
l busin ~s in EnLlr~0cd,
t.:irr F. r.1 n ·
• <:: 1
t i \t • ,. ' • ' ..
..... ~
, • .,f' .. ••,
...:: .. • i. . (
• •
-
•
•
f
( ,,
.. :, '
. ·,
•
-
F.XlttB!T C
LEASEHOLn AGREEMENT
•'•
TH!S !NDENTURP., Made this lat day of J u ly , !.D. 197 5 ,
between Craatolte, !nc . a Colorado corporation, th,· le sor, a n d
Kenneth E. Chandler Incorporated th~ lessee ;
Vt'l'1'!SSETR, 'nlat, in conoideration of the payment of the
rent and the keeping and performance o f tha covcm.:.nta and agTee-
menta by the said lessee hereinnfter aet forth, t~~ r.aid lessor
he eby lea••• unto the said leooca the f0Jlo1 n ~aocr1b6d premises ,
situate 1n the County of Arap3ho~ in the Sr.at ~ or CCLOT~do, to wit :
5450 South Broadvay, Englewood, Colorcuo
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same with all the appurtenanceo
unto the said leaaee from 8:00 o'clock A.M. of the lat day
followinR a pproval of final tranefer of th~ l~quor license from
STokea and Company to leao o e, for n t~rm cadi 1g on the last day
of that month in the year l ~e J at ~nd for ~~nt 1 for the full
te aforesaid of Thi~ty Thouaand Doll~ro c~~o.000 .00) in monthly
in tallmcnts at n r .. u:e as follows : $ '100. 00 p l r i. nth for the
fir o t 24 month•; $550 .00 pr ~onth fo : t he n~tond 24 months ;
$ 00 . 00 per month for the final 12 11.on h 1J (,, th n option
axpreaely Rl:'•nted le:oaee to ren11 .1 un<1 tt t t :1.1.1 11<. forth her in
under caption "Renew.al Option" pay.i L.> o ' th..: h•c day of each
c alendar month durinR aaid term 4t t h o c ti ~e ~f ~tokLo anQ
Company or deeignated ago1lt, vitno t nf't k o ~ t.:> tiwo .
'I'he leeaor •hall
o f the term th eubj ct pr
oc cupancy Ml cer if i or
c o li ce 1th pp icable
In con•U c.r a tion of h 1 ad,:!" o f
afo reaaid , l•• v nc.nt and ar,r •~ ~
nt o.
BS
-
•
f
. '
. .
•
•
-
ADDITIONAL COVENANTS AND PR~VISIONS:
Electrical service is prenently provided on a single
me ter to the combined filling station and liquor store operation .
Subject to the additional pravisions contain~d hereinafter
concerning use by l~asee of additional electrically operated and
lighted advertising a ir,ns or fixtures not nov in place, all
aaseasment1 for utilities rent that ruay be levied against aaid
premisca durin~ the continuance of thie Lease shall be paid by
the 86.id leaaor. and all char~ea for heating, air conditioning
·· • and .-lighting ·and water supplied to the eaid premioea ohall be paid
by the leasor as the aame become due 4nd payable. Lessee, ho""«lver ,
hall reimburse lessor monthly ior any increaoe in leaaor 'a uti ity
bill due to and equal to the increase, if any, cauoed by any
exterior or interior electrical fixtures installed by leoaee .
..
In the event aai~ promiaea shall b~come unt~nablo on account of
damage by fire, flood or act of God, thia Lcaoo n:ay be thereupon
t erminated by the s4id lessee.
Tho lessor agreee to undertake, aaeume and perforin the
msintcmance of the premises in thooe areaa aocociated with the
exterior of the prem.iaea, including atructurul feature• end
roofing, and inlcuding alao the maintcnanc~ of air conditionina
and heating equipmen~ and to \l.clint~in poltcica of inaurance for
fire ond extended c~verege and gen~ral liability coverin the
premiaea, but not the property of leaoee.
The leaaor agr••• end covenants that it will not compet
'*h leaaee ond that it ahall not caus nor suffer to be initiated
by itaelf or lta other tenants upon tho nd)acant pramiaea of l8
crea controlled by Graatolte, Inc. ar.y ale or diapen1in of
pack.aged 'liquor,· win• or b .. r, nor c ·:.;.J.:"otteo no ooft·dri lka .to
the public from the ~asoUne station prccc.1tly lo::3t~d upon the
8 acrea . . .
The leaaeo agrees to undertaku ~nd porfol"lll the intc:man
of th premises in thoa~ rea a oaaociatcd ''1th th int rior of t e
pr..S.sea. including fixtu·ca, and o eluo maintein inaur nc
cover s; ~· any and all prc.n1i0Qa glaoo br •. ~·ago an prem a a
1 bil ty .
••
c.. : .r J J .. ~ •
•
-
(
(
•
•
f
•
-
-
The parties agree ··that lessee in authorized hereby to
und ertake the painting of the interior and exterior of the subjec t
prem ises to such extent as lessee might desire, nnd that such
painting o f the exterior of t}\~ premises may include lettering
or o ther advertising of lessee's business conducted therein .
It is acknowledged that n oale between the parties of
c ertain equipment and fixtures precently situate upon the pread.•••
1 • t o be cone\mlated concurrent with the tcnu of this Leaoe, and
t h a~-tit1e to those items of equipment and fixtureB so purchased
b y .leesee, ao well as other it(.!l!UI of equipment and fixtures .
eub aequently acquired by leasae, and applied to use upon the
prcmiAtee, shall remain the property of le11ee evGn though their
uJ ~ or applica~1on otherwise indicate their nature ao that of ..
ixturea or itemo of property attached to the prcrdcea. If at
t h e end of the te'l."lll o f this leaoe how3ver, &nd in event that
r -s to~ation coats be incurred in the evc~t of ~nd as tbe result o f
t h e removal of any such itemo of lease19 's property from tile
premise1,,then th~ leasee shall aaoume end does n~ree to pay or
reimburee lesaor such co•t•.
TERMIJIATIOM, COMPLETIOl!I OF TERM, RENmlAL A lD 'R.EMEDIES
No •••ent, txpreased or implied, to any breach of qry
one or ore of tbe covenants or agrec..:ienta h~rLo f ehall be d e etit d
or tak n to be a waiver of any euccoedin or oth~r breach.
If after the expiration of thi• Lease or ronew~l term,
the leuee shAl.1 remain in posoouion of eaid pn.:.r icea·; m1d
continue to p.ty c nt without '1rittc n cgreLn~nt aa to ouch posses loo
t h en euch loasae shall b regardod ao a tcna tt f~c~ C)nth to 1t0ntb
at a itoo~hly rental, payublc in a dvance, ~u val ~nt to ch lnat
.,n tbl inc t&ll cnt hor~und r, and au «.ct t o 1.ll th te n~• and
provteion o this Leaee .
In ca said pr
,
•
\ ,,
••
... .. .. . . · ..
,.
'·
, . • • •I
•
•
•
•
ag&iT\ revert to leaaor: and if at any time said term ahall be
ended 'aa aforesaid or in any other way, the said leas•• hereby
coitcnants and agrees to aurre~~er and deliver up said premises
peaceably to said lesaor, immadiately upon the teruilnation of
said term, and if the lesseo shall rCLW.in !n p~osetaion of the
same after the termination thereof, aaid lo•••• shall be de--4
guilty of a forcible detainer of aaid premiaea under the atatute,
and ab.all be subject to eviction and rellOV&l.
...-t .qrn., .
!.. ) ""). ...
. Prior to th• U,tratlon of the initial s year term 1\eretn,
and upon 90 day written notice by le•••• of hie intention, laaaee
. ahall have th• option to renew thla lease for cne additional S
year -term upon the 1am• and idm:ittcal tormo and c~nditlons aa
herein, eave end e:te~ept that the aiaount of rant for the renewal
(5 year) tenn •hall b~ Thirty-Six Thouo~nd Dolla=a ($36,000.~0)
payable in all llAtmer •• in the lnitlal tet.·.:i except coi.:p1.1tod &a
and payable et tho rnte of Six Hundred Dollaro ($600.00) per
month, plus an 11ddition.il mount, if any, haoe:i 'll"1>on the llJl:nediotely
precedins one month• a op.ttationa and puy.Ji>lB in like mcnr.~r •
monthly and equal to 31 of tha gro•a a ~lcu o~er $12,000.00 in
any one month fro~ the bu.inc•• conducted on the 1ubj~ct prC4"l i1ea
by le••••·· Sw:h rcn ~~41 •gT•8illent shall be reduced to writing.
Thil LeaH 11 m&d~ by and bstuoan tho porti•• horeto
with the espr••• undaretandlng and ·~~~~ant that, in th• e~unt
the l••• .. baccn.a inaolv~nt, or lo o~clJred b~nkrupt •. th ~n in
elt'--nent, the laHor 11.1&7 declare Chia I e;iu a c.1ded and all
rild\Ca of l•••ee hereW\der ehall thereupon ternin te end ceac o;
anCl furtbar, in th avont: that: Xen11cl:b E . C:h:....!dl or 1 u ot SUCCH8ful
in hie 1-diate and goc:ld faith appUc.iticm, o d tho r cipictt t
o f llcencee theraon realOft&bly forthcouina . for perwi1sio~ a~d
uthority to operate a pa<:t:a liqt.0 r ator u1.o.1 the pr 1i oeo ,
n e ith r party y un il at ~~~l lf d c l a ro thio c s void ~1 t h
no r 1n 1n b li at l ona or liabilit i cJ ~t ~r~ d-~·
• •
-
\ _,. .
:_-.•
\
. . :
•
'
'·
•
0 -
. .,. ·-·
.f MARY ESTIL L •t' ~'.H A
l 'llOFIT
l .'·( ,,,tl'\lt•.-\Th.,,
.~;,.,,rlar'I </./la/('''/ /j,, . .'Jlfll, '/ (./,~,,,,;, /,t,,111 ,,,,/'/'! fh,,1
Jn J'j{((f n/ /,. //,, J J'( l'f.Jff Jlj '/ //,,. '!: /,., ,,,/, (, '/" n1/1 , II , /,I r h •/,,./,, '/
. /11n J'jtr n1/1", 11 ,,., "' ,/,./, 1 r·rr rl Ir //,1 J '//'"'' /,.,, nrl /. 11 ''/' r111 /, /,,,, 11 ,,,/
jrlrrlrn //,,·, t//"'·
. '/,.,. ?trl1 Jlf'//'/ /j,,. 1n11lr·r11'q Jlf'r/ /11 1 ,·,,1,,, '/ //,r ,,,,f/,, n/11 11 if,,/, 11
.---------------I'c-nn th r.. Ch Mdlcr, 1 c orprrr:'l t''"'< --· -------=.";---------" , .. ., . " '
!)~,/,,///,,, ---.1 "<'n th---rl.111 '/ 1.i:-----. ;t 1 1 ·, ;r;
(I>
r
• •
,
\ _,
•
0
•
3 A
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN SOVERN
BY AUTHORITY
ORDI A CE NO. ..Eo , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORD! A CE REPEAL! G AND REENACT! G SECTIONS
22.4-5 A D 22 .4-6 ENTITLED "R-2-A A D R-2-B RESIDENTS DIS-
TRICT", OF THE CITY OF E GLEWOOD COMPREHENSIV E ZO ING
ORD I ANCE (ORDI A CE NO. 26, SERIES 1963, AS AME NDE D)
WHER EIN SAID SECTIO S RELATE TO PERMITTED USES, MINIMUM LOT
AREA, MINIMUM FLOOR AREA, MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE,
MINIMUM FRO TAGE OF LOTS, MI IMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS, HEIGHT
REQUIREMENTS, ACCESSORY BUILD!. GS, SIGNS AND CONDITIONAL USES.
OW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOO D, COLORADO , as follows:
Section 1.
That Sections 22.4-5 and 22.4-6 of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance o. 26 , eries 1963) re hereby
repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
to encour
diff rin
innov
22.4-5 R-2 Medium Density Residence District
of the c1 izens of Englewood is
of housing o meet he need of the
and the v r ing family tructures
of dev lopm n through th u e of
1 n d d velopmental procedures.
overning
l -
• •
\ ./
<•
•
•
,. -
the size and extent of such non-residential act1v1t1es. This
District is protected against encroachment of general comm -
ercial or industrial uses while the regulations permit dev -
elopment consistent with the concentration of persons and land
valuation in the area.
a. Su lementar re ulations. The provisions found
in this Zone D1str1ct s all e su Ject to the requirements
and standards found in 22.5, Supplemen tary Regulations,
unless otherwise provided for in this Ordi nance or an amendment
hereto.
b. Permit cd principal uses.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Si"ngle family dwelling.
Two-family dwelling , with at least one party
wall and under a common roof.
Multi -family dwel lings not exceeding 14 un its
p r a cre. Planned Development approval is required
for four or more units.
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Religious institutions.
Educational instituti o ns.
Public facilities. (Amn'd. by Ord. No. 35,
Series of 1971)
Day Care cen ter s.
c. Minimum area of lot.
(1) ingle-family dwelling ................•.... 6,000
(2) Two-family dwell in ........................ 6,000
(3) Each additional unit ....................... 3,000
(Amn'd . by Ord. o. 35, Series of 1971)
(4) Dy Ca r e ce nters ....................•...... 6,000
(5) All o her permitted uses .................. 42,000
d . Minimu floo r area.
(1) Single-£ mily dw llin ....................... 850
2) Two or or -f m11y dwellings:
efficiency n /or on e bedroom ............ 650
wo b droom uni .•....................... 750
thre bedroo uni ................•...... 950
each dd1tion l bedroom .................. 110
lot
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
q.
q.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
f
ft.
ft.
ft.
f
o lot c v r .........•....•..•.... 30\
ac'li ie includin
con id r d lo .)
-2-
• •
-
\ _,
•
•
0
•
f . Mi nimum useable open space.
Minimum useable open s pace .............................. 50%
40 % of wh i ch shall be in the required front yard
g. Min i mum landscap i ng.
Minimum land s caping ............................•••. 15\
h. Utilit i e s.
Util~t i e s service to build i ng s in new developments
must b e placed underground.
i. Min i mum f ront a ge o f l ot .
(1) Single f mily dwelli ng ..............•....... 50 feet
(2) Two-family d wel ling ......................... SO feet
(3) Each addi iona l d we lling u n i t ............... 25 feet
(Amn 'd . b y Ord. o. ~. Se r ies of 19 7 1 )
(4) Day Care c e n t ers ............................ 50 feet
(S) All o her permitted uses ................... 2 0 0 feet
j. Maximu heigh t of building.
Principal building --2-1/2 stories .............. 2 5 feet
k. Minimum front yard.
All per i tted principal u se .................... 2 5 feet
1. Minimu side yard.
(] 1n le f mily dw llin ...................... 3 fe e t
(To al 10 fe for bo th ide )
( ?) Two or or dw ll.in unit ...............•... s f t
(To al l feet for o th ide )
(Amn'd. b Ord. o. 35, nes of 1971)
(3) 11 0 her d principal u e .......... 1s f eet
re r y rd.
• •••••••••••••••••••• ZS fee
(Se 2?.S-S) ( an'd. by Ord. o. 3, !'1 of 1971)
·3·
'
• •
\ .,,
•
•
• •
o. Accessory buildings and permi tted accessory uses.
(In add ition to the following, s ee Supplementary
Regulations)
(1) Private garages an d carports. Private garages
and carpo rt s designed or u sed fo r the storage
or shelter of vehicles owned or ope rated by
the occupants of the principal building;
however, commercial vehicles s ha ll be limited
to thr ee-q uarter (3/4 ) ton carrying cap acity.
(a)
. (b)
(c)
(d)
Max im um height --1-1/2 s tory .......... 15 feet
Minimum f r on yard, see Su pplementary
Regula ti ons.
Side yard .............................. 3 feet
if detached and on rear one-t hird (1/3)
of lot.
Rear yard --if e n e r from fro nt or
side ................................... 3 feet
If en ter ing from al ley .......•......... 6 feet
(2) Home occupa ions. Occ upations customarily
incident. to he princi pal use as a residence
(not to includ barbers, hairdressers, cos-
m t.ologis s, b aut1c1 n ) when condu cted i n
th me dw~ll1ng provi ded that :
{a)
p ro;on
( )
(c
(d )
( )
( )
ra cd 1n its entriety within the
nd only by h e person or
i n1ng a dwelling un i therein.
are enployed.
he m nner of uch u e and
a ed here v are not s uch
with he peace, quiet or
neighborhood and djoin ing
no d er in exce p as
n.
s no hav a
•
'
• •
I
......
\ ~ .
.......
•
•
• •
(g) The use of electric motors is limited
for po er, with a total limitation of three
(3) horsepower and no single unit over one
and one-alf (1-1/2) horsepower.
p. Ot h er provis ions and requirements.
(1) o structure or vehicle on the same lot wi th
the principal dwelling shall be used fo r resi -
dence pu rpo ses .
(2) Two units must have at least one pa r ty wall and
~ common roof.
(3) o use shall be permitted within the Di strict
which, by emitting an obnoxious or dangerous
degree of heat, glare , odor, radiation , or
fumes or undue or exc essive noise beyond any
boundary line of the lot upon which the u se
is loca ed, would become a nuisance to other
val i dly ex i ting uses in the area.
Introduced, read in full and passed on fi r s t
reading on the 7th day of July, 1975.
Publi hed as
10th day of July, 1975.
Bill for an Ordinance on t he
the 4th day
ti le nd p
' 1975.
Publish d
Serie of 1975, on
-s-
ed on fin 1 reading o n
a Ordinance o.
o Au us , 19 S.
• •
'
-
' /
•
•
•
• •
ATTEST :
ex off1c10 City Clerk-Treasurer
I, William 0. James, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of th~ Ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance o. , Series of 1975.
ex 0££1c10 City Clerk-Treasurer
•.
• •
I
\ /
•
•
•
0
•
INTRODUC ED AS A BILL BY COU CILMAN SOVERN
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINA CE NO. , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINAN CE REPEAL! G AND REENACTING SECTIONS
22.4 -5 AND 22.4-6 ENTITLED "R-2-A AND R-2-B RESIDENTS DIS-
TRICT", OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOO D COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES 1963, AS AMENDED)
WHER EIN SAID SECTIO S RELATE TO PERMITrED USES, MIN I MUM LOT
AREA, MINIMUM FLOOR AREA, MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE,
MINIMUM FRO TAGE OF LOTS, MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS, HEIGHT
REQUIREME TS, ACCESSORY BUILDI GS, SIGNS AD CO DITIONAL USES.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1 .
That Sections 22.4-5 and 22.4-6 of the Co prehensive
Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 26, Series 1963) are hereby
repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
22.4-5 R-2 Medium Density Residence District
On of
to encour a v
differing
innov
• •
\ .,
(t
•
0
•
the size and extent of such non-residential act1v1t1es. This
District is protected against encroachment of general comm-
ercial or industrial uses while the regulations permit dev -
elopment con s istent with the concentration of persons and land
valuation in the area.
a. Su p~lementary re!ulations . The provisions found
in this Zone1str1 ct shal be sub Jec t to the requirements
and standards found in 22.S, Supplem entary Regulations,
unless otherwise provided fo r i n this Ordinance or an amendment
hereto.
b. Permitted princ i pal uses.
(1) Single family dwelling.
(2) Two-family dwelling , with at least one party
wall and under a common roof.
(3) Multi -fam ily dwe llings not exceeding 14 units
per acre. Plann d D velopment approval is required
for four or more units.
(4) Religious institution .
(S) Educational instituti o ns.
(6) Public facilities. ( n 'd. by Ord. No. 35,
Series of 1 971)
(7) Day Care centers.
c. Minimum rea of lot.
( l)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(S)
Sin le-f mily dwell ing ..................... 6,000
Two-£ mily dwell in ....................•.•. 6,000
E ch addition 1 uni ...................... 3,000
( n'd. by Ord. o. S , Serie of 19 l )
Day Care cente r s ........................... 6,000
All o h~r p r i du es .................. 42,000
d . Minimum floor ar
(1) Si n le-f
2 1 0
l . . • . . . . • • . • . . • . . • • • • . . • so
llln
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
q. ft.
sq. ft.
q. ft.
sq. ft.
q. ft.
sq. ft.
q. ft.
......... ' ............ . 30\
'
• •
-
\ ,,
-
•
0
•
f. Minimum useable open space.
Mi nimum useable ope n space .............................. SO \
40 \ of wh ich s h all be in the required front yard
g. Minimum landscap in g.
Minimum land scaping ..............................•• lS\
h. Utilities.
U t il~ties service to buildings in new development s
must b e placed underground.
i. Min imum f rontage of lot.
(1) Singl family dwelling ...................... SO feet
(2) Two-family dwelling ......................... SO feet
(3) Each additi on 1 dwelling unit ............... ZS feet
(Amn 'd . by Ord. 'o. ~. Series of 1971 )
(4) Day Care centers ............................ SO feet
(S) All other permit ed uses ................... ZOO feet
j. Maximum hight of building.
Principal building --Z-1/Z tories .............. ZS feet
k. Minimum fron yard.
All pe mit ed principal u es ..................... ZS feet
1. inimum id y rd.
( ) Single family
(2 ) wo or
n'd. y
0) All o her
( .
3 het
s f t
for bot h Sld )
19 1)
...•....•• 1 s feet
1 •••.••••.•••••••••••• 25 fee
n
y Ord. o. ri s o 1971)
'
• •
,
-
\ _,
(
'
•
•
•
0
•
o. Accessory buildings and permitted accessory uses.
(I n addi ti on o the fo llowi n g, ee Supplementary
Regulation )
(1) Private arages and carports. Private garages
and carports designed or u sed f or the storage
or shelter of vehicles owne d or o perated by
the occupant s of the nrincipa l building;
however, comm er cial vehicles s hall be limited
to three -qu a rter 3/4 on car rying capacity.
(a)
.(b)
(c)
(d )
Max imum heigh t --1-1/2 s tory .......... 15 feet
Minimum f ront yard , see Supplementary
Regulations.
Side ya rd ............................. 3 feet
if deta ched and on rear one -third (1/3)
of lot .
Rear yard --if en er from fro nt or
side ................................... 3 feet
I" e n er in g from a lley. . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . 6 feet
(2 ) Ho e occupa ions . Occ upa ions customarily
incid ent to he principal us as a residence
(no o include barhe r s, hairdre ss ers, cos -
m tologist , beauticians) when conducted in
t he same dwellin pr o ided hat:
( ) I is oper ated in i ts en triety within the
( )
(c )
( )
( )
(f
d elling uni nd only by he person or
persons aint ini ng a dwelling unit therein.
o assi tan
.4 •
are employed.
such use and
are no suc h
quie t o r
adjoi n in
dver•i i n e cep as
do not hav a
nc •
UtllU
th
unit,
th re
prov d d ,
ap ly o
'
• •
-
\ J
(
•
0
•
(g) The use of electric motors is limited
for power, with a otal limitation of th re e
(3) horsepower and no single unit over on e
and one-half (1-1/2) horsepow r.
p . Ot her provisions and requireme n ts.
(1) o struc ure or vehicle on the same l ot with
the principal d !ling shall be used for resi -
dence purposes.
(2) Two un its mu have at leas t one party wall and
·a common roof.
(3) o use shall b permitted withi n the District
which, by em1 ting n obno·ious or dangerous
degree of heat, qlare, odor, radia t ion, or
fume or undu or excessi e noise beyond any
boundary line of the lot upon which th e use
is loca ed, ould becom a nuisance t o other
validly exi ing u es in he area.
In reduced, read in full and passed on f irs t
reading on he .. h day of uly, 1975.
Published a Bill for an Ordin a n ce on the
10th d a y of July, 19 5.
Read b i le nd passed on final rea d i ng on
the 4 h day of Au us , 19 S.
bv
Serie o .. tle as
d .
o.
s.
..
'
• •
(
•
0
•, •
ATTEST :
I, W11 iam D. lmes, do her e by ce rtify that
the abo v nd foregoing i true, accu r ate and c omplete
c o py of the Ord1nanc , pa ed on final reading and
1 9 75 . p u blished by tl s Oru i nanc o. , Se r i es of
ex o ic10
'
• •
,
\ _, .
•
•
----.
0
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN SOVERN
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTIONS
22.4 -5 AND 22.4-6 ENTITLED "R-2-A AD R-2-B RESIDENTS DIS-
TRICT", OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 26 , SERIES 1963, AS AMENDED)
WHEREIN SAID SECTIONS RELATE TO PERMITTED USES, MINIMUM LOT
AREA, MINIMUM FLOOR AREA, MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE,
MINIMUM FRONTAGE OF LOTS, MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS, HEIGHT
REQUIREMENTS, AC CESS ORY BU IL DINGS, SIGNS AND CONDITIONAL USES.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGL EWOOD , COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
That Sections 22.4-5 and 22.4-6 of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 26, Series 1963) are hereby
repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
22.4-5 R-Medium De ns ity Residence District
One of the go ls of the citizens of Englewood is
to encoura e a var1 t y of hou in to meet the needs of the
differing income level and he varying family structures
by emphasizin quality of de elo p ent through the use of
innova ive and well -de ig ned developmental procedures.
fro
• 1 •
entially for a tran ition
-high den ity two-family
areas. The regulation
t bilize and protect the
str c , o proaote and n ·
ible w th th int ns1ty of land
family 1 and to prohibit
al na ur except c rtain
p c fie 1 a1t tions o rn i na
• •
-
\ ,,
•
• ,
0
•
the size and extent of such non-residential act ivit ies. This
District is protected against encroachment of general comm-
ercial or industri al uses while the regulation s permit dev-
elopment con sis tent with the concentration of persons and land
valuation in the area.
a. Supblementary re gu l at ions. The provisions found
in this Zone 1str1ct shall be subJect to the requirements
and standards found in 22.5, Supplementary Regulat ions ,
unless otherwise provided or in this Ordinance or an amendment
hereto .
b. Permit ed principal uses.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Si~gle family dwelling.
Two-family dwelling, with at least one party
wall and under a common roof.
Multi-family dwellings not exceeding 14 units
per acre. Plann ed D velopment approval is required
for four or more units.
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
Religious institutions.
Educa t ional instituti ons.
Public facilities. (Amn'd. by Ord. No. 35,
Series of 19 1)
Day Care center
c. Minimum area of lot.
(1) Single-family dwelling ........•............ 6,000 sq . ft.
(Z) Two -£ mily dwelling ............•........... 6,000 sq. ft.
(3) E ch addition 1 uni ...........•........... 3,000 sq. ft.
( n'd. by Ord. No. 35 , Series of 1971)
(4) Day C re centers ........................... 6,000 sq. ft.
(S) All other permi ted us s .•.....•.......... 42,000 sq. ft.
d. Minimum floor ar a.
••
(1 )
(2 )
Sin
Two
le-family dw llin •.................•..•. 850
or or -f m1ly dwellin :
ffi c i n c y and/or on b droo ...•........ 650
two bedroo un i ...........•..•..•.....•. 7 SO
hree b droo uni ......................• 950
each dd1tional b droo ..........•....... 110
carport
co eraae.)
·2·
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
q. ft.
sq. f .
sq. ft.
30
•
• •
t
\ _,
•
•
0
•
f. Minimum useable open s pa ce.
Minimum useable open space .............................. SO%
40 \ of which shall be in the required fro nt yard
g. Minimum landscaping.
Minimum landscaping ...............................• lS\
h. Utilities.
Util!ties service to buildings in new developments
must be placed underground.
i. Minimum frontage of lot.
(1) Single family dwelling ..............•....... SO feet
(Z) Two-family dwelling ......................... SO feet
(3) Each additional dwelling unit ............... ZS feet
(Amn'd. by Ord. o. 3 , Series of 1971)
(4) Day Care centers ............................ SO feet
(S) All other permitted use ................... ZOO feet
j. Maximum height of building.
Principal building --Z-1/Z stories .........•.... 2S feet
k. Minimum front yard.
All p
1.
( l )
( 2)
(3)
••
11
pr1ncip 1 u es ....................• 2S feet
ide yard.
in le fa llY dwell1n .........•....•..•...• 3 feet
(T ot 1 10 fee for both ide )
To or or dw 11 n unit ...........•...... 5 fee
(To al 14 e or bo th ide )
an'd. by Ord .. o. S, ri s of 19"'1)
11 ot her p Tlllit~ d pr1nc1pal u es ..•.....•. lS feet
ard .
pr • •••••••••••••••••••• 25 fe t
rd. o. lA, t'ie o 1971)
• •
-
\ ., .
•
• •
..
o . Accesso ry building s and permitted accessory uses.
(I n addition to the following, s ee Su pplementary
Regulation s)
(1) Private garages and carports. Private garages
and carports designed or used for the storage
or shel er of v eh ic les owned or ope rated by
the occupants o the pr i ncipal building;
ho wever , com~ercial vehicles shall be limited
to three -quarte (3/4 ) ton carrying capacity.
(a) Maximu m height --1 -1/2 s tory .......... 15 feet
.(b) Minimum f ron ya rd, see Supplementary
Regulations.
(c) Side yard .............................. 3 feet
if de ched a1d on rear one -third (1/3)
of lo .
(d) Rear y rd --if e n er from fron t or
side .................................. 3 feet
If enc ing from lley ................. 6 fee t
(2) Home occupa ion s . ccup io ns customarily
inciden o he principal use as a r esidence
(no t o include ba r be r , hairdres ers, cos -
tologi , e uticians) when condu c ted in
he ame dwell1n provided ha t :
(a)
( )
(
(d )
( )
(
i ope rat d in i ts entriety within the
llin uni nd only by he person or
maintaini ng a dwelling unit therein .
are employed.
uch u e and
no such
qu o r
or djo1nin
e cept a
no IV I
• •
-
\ _,
•
0 I•
•
(g) The use of electric motors is l i mited
for pow er, with a otal limitation of three
(3) horsepower and no single unit over one
and one-half (1-1/2 ) horse power.
p. Other provisions and requiremen s.
(1) o struc ure or vehicle o the same lot with
the pri ncipal dwe lling shall be use d for resi-
dence purpo _es.
(2) Two units mus have at least one party wall and
·a common roof.
(3) o use shall e permi tted within the District
wh ich, by emitting an obnoxious or dangerous
degree of he t, glare , odor, radiation, or
fumes or undu or excessive noise beyond any
oundary line of he lot upo n which the use
is loca ed, oul d become a nuisance to other
validly ex is ing u es in the area.
Introduced, re d in full and pas sed on first
readin on th 7th d y of July, 1975.
Published s a Bill or an Ordinance on the
10th da of July, 1975.
he 4 h dav
ri
Pu li
0 l.
le and passed on fin 1 readina on
• 1 75 .
o.
9 s.
•.
'
• •
.......
\ J •
......
• •
ATT EST·
e x o ff1 c 10 Ci t y Clerk-Treasure r
I , Wi l liam D. J me s , do he r eby c erti f y that
th e above n d f ore go1 n is true, accur a t e and complete
c opy o f th Or dinance, passe d o fi n al reading and
publ is h ed by t i le as Or dinan ce o . , Se ries of
1975.
ex o 'f ic io Ci t y Cl e rk -Treasurer
'
• •
-
\ _,
•
•
•
0 I•
•
3 84
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN JONES
BY AUTHORITY
ORDI NANCE NO . 31 , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 22.4-7
AND 22.4 -8 ENTITLED "R-3-A AND R-3-B MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DlSTRICT", OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COM -
PREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINAN CE NO. 26, SERIES
OF 1963, AS AMENDED) WHEREIN SAID SECTIONS RELATE TO
PERMI TTED USES, MINIMUM AREA OF LOT, PERMITTED DENSITY
BONU S SYSTEM, MINIMUM FLOOR AR EA, LOT COVERA GE, OPEN
SPACE, LANDSCAPING, UTILITIES, MINIMUM FRONTAGE OF LOT,
MAX IMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS, MINIMUM YARD AREAS, PER -
MIT TED ACCESSORY USES AND ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES.
NO W, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
That Sections 22 .4 -7 and 22.4-8 of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 26, Series 1963) are hereby
re pealed and reenact ed to read as fo llows:
22.4 -6 R-3, High Density Residence District
I t i a oal of th citizen of Englewood to encouraae a
hou si ng o me t the ne d of the differing income
h v rying family s tru cture by emphasizi ng quality
of d v lopment hrou h he u of new developmental procedures
that will encoura e inno tive w 11 -de igned development .
id r
is inter nt in his o 1 h t the follo wing b con-
pl n hould b ubmitted for all d 1 -
2. sen -
· l .
'
• •
-
\ ...
•
•
0
•
3. High -density residential development should be
located on land parcels of sufficient size to en-
sure proper site design, identity, and to warrant
the installation of desirable amenities.
4 . Where possible, the view of the mountains should be
preserved and enhanced.
The R-3 District is composed of high-density residential
areas of the City, ordinarily located between single and two-
family residential areas and commercial areas, plus certain
open areas where similar development appears likely to occur.
The regulations for this District are designed to stabilize
and protect the essential characteristics of the District, to
promote and encourage, insofar as is compatible with the high
intensity of land use, suitable environment for family life,
and to permit certain professional uses of a character unlikely
to develop general concentration of traffic, crowds of people
and general outdoor advertising. To these ends, this District
is protected against encroachment of general i ndustrial uses
and certain comme rc ial uses while the regulations permit high
development cons istent with the high concentration of persons
and land valuation. Residential types of structures as well
as various institutions are permitted, plus structures for
professional use s conforming to the pattern of the District.
a .
this Zone
standards
otherwise
thereto.
b.
Supplementarr regulat io ns. The provisions found in
District sha 1 be subJect to the require•ents and
found in 22.S, Supplementary Regulations, unless
provided for in this Ordinance or an a•end•ent
Permitted princ i p 1 u
(1) Any u e perm itted in R-2 Zone Di trict.
(2) Multi -fami l y dw llings.
(Am n'd. by Ord. No. 35 , Series of 1971)
(a) Not to exc d forty units per acr , except
as provided in 22.4-6d.
{b) Planned developmen pproval is r quired
for 11 mul i-fa11ily dw llin units .
(3) Ho nd clinics , bu no ni• 1 hosp tals or
(4 ) ir •ent or nior 1t1z n hou 1n , r t
nd nur in ho11
-2·
•
'
• •
-
\ -'
•
0 -
(S) Professional offices in which chattels or goods,
wares or merchandise are not commercially created or sold.
(6) Educational institutions.
(7) Religious institutions.
(8) Public facilities.
c. Minimum area of lot.
(1) Single -family dwellings ........... 6 ,000 sq. f t .
(2) Medium density dwellings .......... (See R-2 Section )
(3) Multi-family dwellings ........... 42,000 sq. f t .
(4) Educational institu io ns, religious
institutions, public faci lities .. 42,000 sq. ft.
(1 net acre)
(5) All other permitted principal
uses ............................. 24,000 sq. ft.
d. Permitted density bonus system.
e.
(1) Bonus for si c assemblage:
Minimum lot re ................. 42,000 sq. ft.
Permi t d ba d n ity ........... 40 d.u./net acre
Bonu for increa ed lo as embly. 2 d.u. for each
additional 1,000
sq. ft. assembled
(2) Maximu ensi y wi h bonu es ..... 70 d.u./net acre
(1)
( )
e 1 in . . . . . . . . . . 850
h ·den i y dwellin
q. ft.
droo ....... 650 q. f .
750 q. ft.
unit •................. 950
l droo ...•......... 11 O
q. f
q. f .
35'
2S
p n on o • •
-
\ .,,
•
0
•
h. Minimum land scaping .
Minimum landscaping ....... 25\ of the total lot area.
Not less than 4 0\ of he land capi ng shall be in the
front yard .
i. Utilities.
Utilities service o bu1ld1n
must be placed underground .
j. Minimum frontage of lot.
in new developments
(1) Single-family dwellin ..................... SO ft.
(2) Medium densit y dwelling (See R-2
District
Regulations.
(3) All other permitted principal uses ......... None
k. Maximum height of bu1ldi n~.
(1) Si ngle -family and m dium density dwellings •..••..
. .. .. .. .. . .. Z-1/2 s tories ................. 25 ft.
(2) All other permitted principal uses ....... five (S)
stories plus garden level, but not higher than
sixty (60) feet. (Also see Supplemental Regula -
tions, 22.5-7.
1. Minimum front yard.
(1) All permitted principal u es:
Up to three tories ..........•..•••......... 15 ft.
Four or five torie .....................•. 20 ft.
More h n fiv stories ...................... 25 ft .
y ard.
(1) -f ily d elll ng...................... 3 ft.
(To l 10' for both sid s)
(:?) di den i y........................ R·Z Sec ion.
l ) All o he p r itt .d prin ip l u .......... 15 ft.
prtn p l u ... ' ............. . s t.
.
o. 4, s 0
•.
• •
.......
\ ~
•
•
•
0
•
p. Minimum off street loading requirements.
(See Supplementary Reg ulations)
q. Accessory buildings a n d permitted accessory uses.
(1) Private garage s or carports. Priv ate garages
or carport s designed or u se d for the storage
of motor vehicles owned or operated by the
occupants of the principal building; however,
commer cial vehicles shall be limited to a
three -q uarte r (3/4) ton carrying ca pacity.
(2)
(3)
(a) Maximum height, single-family or medium
density ..... 1-1/2 story ....•........... 15 ft.
Hi gh densit y dwelli ng s ... 3 stories ..... 35 ft.
(b) linimum front yard ..... See Suppl ementary
Regulations.
(c) Side ya rd.............................. 3 ft.
if detached and on rear one-third (1/3)
of lot.
(d) Rear yard.............................. 3 ft.
Non -commercial parki ng lot .
Required par ing may be provided within 400 feet
of h prop r , ei her within th same district
or within a dis rict which permit non -commer ci al
par ing lo Such p r ing lo t m y be maintained
long ~ princ1p 1 er•t ed use is m i nt ined.
·S·
as, but not
y shop , gift hop ,
nd day care cen-
conv ni n ee of th
• •
-
\ _,
•
0
•
"ENVIRONME TAL GUIDELINES"
1. Solar and wind exposure.
Tall structures located adjacent to major open spaces
should be sited to insure maxi mum sunlight on the
open spaces during the winter months.
The grouping of tall buildings sho uld be sited to
allow for proper air circulation.
Tall buildings should be sited upon the north side
of pedestrian spaces to provide protection f rom
winter storms.
Wind breaks such as tre groupi ngs should be provided
in all major open s p cc
2. Planting.
Plant ma erials should be selec ed from varieties and
specie tha re acclimated for pecial climatic condi-
di ons found within he Dnglewood rea. Attention should
be given to the size and char c er of materials which
will produce the d sired 1 nd c ped effect. Provisions
should be made for irriga ion nd feeding systems and
placement for proper ma intenance and protection to ins ure
mature growth of the plant .
(a) Plant m t rials should be rr nged in a mann r to
complement he archi ec ur 1 quali of plaza area
(b) u d in plaza areas to
he win er month .
3. P r ing.
a) er n d from public vie
{ ) 11ajor
and
d vice
'
• •
,
-
\ _,
•
• l•
•
Introduced, read in full and passed on firs t reading on the 7th day of July, 1975.
Published as a Bill for an Or dinance on the 10th day of July, 1975.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the 4th day of August, 1975.
Published by title as Ordinance No.
Se r ies of i975, on the 7th day of August, 1975.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ex officio City Clerk-Trea urer
I, William D. Jam , do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of the Ordinance, p ssed on fin l reading and
published by title s Ordinanc No. , Series of 1975.
'
• •
......
\ ~
(
•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN JONES
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINAN CE NO. , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE REPEALI NG AND REENACTING SECTIONS 22.4-7
AND 22.4-8 ENTITLED "R-3-A AND R-3 -B MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT", OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COM-
PREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES
OF 1963, AS AMENDED) WHEREIN SAID SECTIONS RELATE TO
PERMITTED USES, MINIMUM AREA OF LOT, PERMITTED DENSITY
BONUS SYSTEM, MINIMUM FLOOR AREA, LOT COVERAGE, OPEN
SPACE, LANDSCAPING, UTILITIES, MINIMUM FRONTAGE OF LOT,
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS, MINIMUM YARD AREAS, PER-
MITTED ACCESSORY USES AND ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORA DO, as follows:
Section 1.
That Sections 22.4 -7 and 22.4-8 of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordin nee (Ordinance o. 26, Series 1963) are hereby
rep aled nd reen cted to read follows:
22.4 -6 R-3, High D nsity Residence Di trict
of En lewood to ncourage a
d of the differin incoae
by empha iiin quality
of new d elopm ntal procedures
w 11-de i ned developaents.
It i inher nt in h1 oal hat he following b con-
pl n _hould uba tt d or all d vel ·
z. n ·
·1 ·
'
• •
-
\ .;
•
•
•
0
•
3. High-density residential development should be
located on land parcel of sufficient size to en-
sure proper site design, identity , and to warrant
the installat ion of desirable ame n iti es.
4 . Where possible, the iew of the mountains should be
preserved and enhanced.
The R-3 District is composed of high-density residential
areas of the City, ordinarily located between single and two-
family residential areas and commercial areas, plus certain
open areas where similar development appears likely to occur.
The regulations for this District are designed to stabilize
and protect the essential characteristics of the District, to
promote and encourage, insofar as is compatible with the high
intensity of land use, suitable environment for family life,
and to permit certain professional uses of a character unlikely
to develop general concentration of traffic, crowds of people
and general outdoor advertising. To these ends, this District
is protected against encroachment of general industrial uses
and certain commercial uses while the regulations permit high
development consistent with the high concentration of persons
and land valuation. Residential types of structures as well
as various institution s are permitted, plus structures for
professional use s conforming to the pattern of the District.
a.
this Zone
standards
otherwise
ther to.
b.
Supplementart regulation s. The provisions found in
District sha I be subJect to the requireaents and
found in 22.5, Supplementary Regulations, unless
provided for i n thi s Ordin n ee or an amendment
Permitted p ri ncipal us
(1) Any u e perm i tted in R -2 Zone District.
(2) Mult i-family dwellings.
(Amn 'd. by Ord. No. 35, S ries of 1971)
(3 )
( 4 )
(a) ot t o xc d for y units p r acre, except
s pro 1d d in 22.4 -6d.
(b ) Plann d d v lop nt pproval s requir d
for 11 multi ·f lly d ellina units .
c lin ic s, Ho p nd u or c l not n • 1 ho pitals
nt or n1or l 1% n hou in ' r nd nur 1n hom
·2·
'
• •
\ _,
•
•
•
•
0 I•
•
(5) Professional offices in which chattels or goods,
wares or merchandise are not commercially created or sold.
(6) Educational institutions.
(7) Religious institutions.
(8) Public facilities.
c. Minimum area of lot.
(1) Single-family dwellings ........... 6,000 sq. ft.
(2) Medium density dwellings .......... (See R-2 Section)
(3) Multi-family dw ellings ........... 42,000 sq. ft.
(4) Educational institutions, religious
institutions, public facilities .. 42,000 s q. ft.
(1 net acre)
(5) All other permitted principal
uses ............................. 24,000 sq. ft.
d. Permitted density bonus system.
(1)
(2)
Bonus for site assemblage:
Minimum lo area ................. 4 2, 000 sq. ft.
Permitted base density ........... 40 d.u./net acre
Bonus for increased lot assembly. 2 d.u. for each
additional 1,000
sq. ft. as embled
Maximum d nsity with bonuses ..... 70 d.u./net acre
e. Minimum floor area.
(1)
(2)
Singl ·famil y dwellin s...... ... . 850 sq. ft.
M diu den ity and high -dens ty dwellings:
Efficiency and/or one bedroom ....... 650 sq. f.
To bedroom unit .................... 750 sq. ft.
Thre b droom unit .................. 950 sq. ft.
E ch ddi ion 1 bedroom ............. 110 q. ft.
35'
not
25\
w h l•nd e pin on o . )
'
• •
\ j
•
0
•
h. Minimum landscaping.
Minimum landscaping ....... 25 % of the total lot area.
Not less than 40 % of the landscaping shall be in the
front yard.
i. Utilit ies .
Utilities service to buildings in new developments
mu st be placed underground.
j . Minimum frontage of lot.
(1) Single-family dwelling ..................... SO ft.
(2) Medium density dwelling (See R-2
District
Regulations.
(3) All other permitted principal use s ......... None
k. Max imum he ight of buildin .
(1) Single-family and medium density dwellings .•••...
. . . . . . . . . . . . 2-1/2 stories ................• 25 ft.
(2) All other permitted principal uses ....... five (S)
stories plus garden level, but not higher than
ixty (60) feet. (Also see Supplemental Regula -
tions, 22.5-7.
1. Minimum front yard.
o.
(1) All permitted principal u es:
Up o three s tories ........•.......•......•• 15 ft.
Four or five Storie ...............•.....•. 20 ft.
More th n five torie s .........•..•......... 25 ft.
Minimum ide yard.
(1) Sin 1 -f ily dw llina ...................... 3 ft.
(To t 1 10' for both side s)
(2) diu densi y •••.•••••.•.••••..•••••• S R-2 Sec ion.
(3) All o her permitt d pr1nc1pal u e .......... 15 ft.
(l All p ra d princ1p 1 u • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 2 s f .
ri s of
-4 ·
• •
-
\ _,
-
•
•
•
0 I•
•
p. Minimum off st ree t loading requirements.
(See Supplementary Reg ulation s)
q. Accessory build i ngs and permitted accessory uses.
(1) Private garages o r ca rports. Private garages
or carports designed or used for the storage
of motor veh icles owned or operated by the
occupants of the principal building; however,
commercial vehicle s shall be limited to a
three-quarter (3/4) ton carrying capacity.
(2)
(3 )
(a) Maximum height, single-fam il y or medium
den sity ..... l -1/2 s tory ................ 15 ft.
High d e nsit y dwellings ... 3 sto ries ..... 35 ft.
(b) Minimum front yard ..... See Supplemen tary
Regulations.
(c) Side yard.............................. 3 ft.
if detached and on rear one-third (1/3)
of lot.
(d) Rear yard.............................. 3 ft.
par in
s l o n a
d within 400 £ et
the same district
non-commercial
y be maintained
u e i maint ined.
• •
-
\ _,
•
•
0 I•
•
"ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES"
1. Solar and wind exposure.
Tall structures located adjacent to major open spaces
should be sited to insure maxim um sunlight on the
open spaces during the winter months.
The grouping of tall buildings should be sited to
allow for proper air circulation.
Tall buildings should be sited upon the north side
of pedestrian spaces to provide protection from winter storms.
Wind breaks such as tree groupings shou ld be provided
in all major open spaces.
2. Planting .
3.
Plant materials should be elected from varie ties and
species that are acclimated for pecial cli atic condi-
ditons found within the Englewood rea. Attention should
be given to the size and charac er of m ter ial whi ch
will produce the d sired land c ap d ffect. Provisions
should be made for irrigati o n nd feeding syste•s and
placement for proper ma in e nan e nd protec ion to ins ure
•ature grow h of th pl n
(a ) Plant h o ul d b e rran d in a 11 nner to com pl ent a r ch1 e c ural uall y of plaza area
(b ) in plan areas to
onths.
P r ing.
(a) p
b
ou l d e r public i w
lb ) th ••Jor
nd
d ice
'
• •
,
......
\ J
•
•
•
• ~
•
Introduced, read in full and passed on first
reading on the 7th day of July, 1975.
Published as a Bill f or an Ordinance on the 10th day of July, 1975.
Read by title and pas sed on final reading on
the 4th day of Augu st, 1975.
Published by title as Ordinance No.
Series of i975, on the 7th day of August, 1975.
MAYOR
ATTEST :
ex off1c1 0 City Clerk-Treasurer
I, William D. James, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of th Ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of
19 75.
ex of f1c10 City Cle rk -Treasurer
-7-
~
•
'
• •
,
\ _,
-
•
•
•
•
•
t• -
'·
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN JONES
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTIONS 22.4-7
AND 22.4-8 ENTITLED "R-3-A AND R-3 -B MULTI-FAMILY
RESIDENCE DISTRICT", OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COM-
PREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 26 , SERIES
OF 1963, AS AMENDED) WHEREIN SAID SECTIONS RELATE TO
PERMITTED USES, MINIMUM AREA OF LOT, PERMITTED DENSITY
BONUS SYSTEM, MINIMUM FLOOR AREA, LOT COVERAGE, OPEN
SPACE, LANDSCAPING, UTILITIES, MINIMUM FRONTAGE OF LOT,
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS, MINIMUM YARD AREAS, PER-
MITTED ACCESSORY USES AND ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINES.
OW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
Zonin
repea l
.4 -1 and 22.4-8 of the Comprehensive
o. 2 , Series 1963) are hereby
ad a fo llows:
id er
1.
2.
i inht'rt-n · n
District
of Englewood to encouraae a
d of the differing inco
ure by emphasizing qual1t
ne developmental procedur
11 -de i ned developments.
ha the followin be con-
nt pl n hould b it d for all d 1 -
-1 -
proj ct hould be en-
dj c nt d v lopaent.
tructur should r spect
o th land.
•.
• •
,
\ /
•
0
•
3. High -densi ty residential development should be
lo cated on land parcels of sufficient size to en-
sure proper site design, identity, and to warrant
the installation of desirable amenities.
4. Where possible, the view of the mountains should be
preserved and enhanced.
The R -3 District is composed of high-density residential
areas of the City, ordinarily located between single and two-
family residential areas and commercial areas, plus certain
open areas where similar development appears likely to occur.
The regulations for this District are designed to stabilize
and protect the essential characteristics of the District, to
promote and encourage, insofar as is compatible with the high
intensity of land use, suitable environment for faaily life,
and to permit certain professional uses of a character unlikely
to develop general concentration of traffic, c rowds of people
and general outdoor advertising. To these ends, this District
is protected against encroachment of general industrial uses
and certain commercial uses while the regulations permit high
development consistent with the high concentration of persons
and land valuation. Residential types of structures as well
as various institutions are permitted, plus structures for
professional uses conforming to the pattern of the District.
a.
this Zone
standards
otherwise
thereto.
b.
Supplementarf regulations. The provisions found in
District sh I be subJect to the requireaents and
found in 22.5, Supplementary Regulations, unless
provided for in his Ordinance or an amendment
P r itted principal us
(1) Any u e pe itt d in R-2 Zo ne District.
(2) Multi -family dw llin .
( n'd. by Ord. o. 35, S rie of 1971)
(4)
(a) ot to xc d for y units per acre, except
a pro 1d d in 22.4-6d.
(b ) Pl nn d d v lop ent approval i required
for 11 •ul i -f mily dwellin units.
nd c l1n1cs, but no ni• 1 ho pitals
nt or n1or 1tiz n hou ina, r
nd nur ina ho
'
• •
-
\ .,,
•
0 -
(S) Profess i onal offices in which chattels or goods,
wares or merchandise are not commercially created or sold.
(6) Educat i onal inst i tutions.
(7) Relig i ous institutions.
(8) Publi c facilitie s .
c. Min i mum area of lot.
(1) Single-family dwellings ........... 6,000 sq. ft.
(2) Medium density dwellings .......... (See R-2 Section)
(3) Multi-family dwellings ........... 42,000 sq. ft.
(4) Educational i nstitutions, religious
institutions , public facilities .. 42,0 00 s q. ft.
(1 net acre) (5) All other permit t ed principal
uses ............................. 24 ,000 sq. ft.
d. Permitted density bonus system.
(1 ) Bonu s for sit e assemblage :
Minimum lot area ................. 42,000 sq. ft.
Permitted bas e d e n ity ........... 40 d.u ./net acr e
Bonus f or in c r e a ed lo assembly. 2 d.u. for each
additional 1,000
sq. ft. assembled
(2) Maximum density with bonuses ..... 70 d.u./net acre
e . Minimu floor re .
(l) Single f . . . . . . . . . . 850 s q . ft. (~) di u d n it nd h i gh -densit y dw 1 lings : ffic 1en nd/o r o ne bedroom ....... 650 s q. ft. Two b droo uni .............. ' ... 750 q. ft. T ree bed r oom un 1 t •.••••.•••••••••.. 950 q. f t. h add1 ional d r oo . . . . . . . . . . . . . llO q . ft.
ov r e ............. 35'
c rpo rt r no
2 5'
l nd c pin on top
'
• •
-
\ _,
•
•
0 t•
•
h. Minimum landscaping.
Minimum landscaping ....... 25 % of the total lot area.
Not less than 40 % of the landscaping shall be in the
front yard.
i. Utilities.
Utilities service to buildings in new developments
must be placed underground.
j. Minimum frontage of lot.
(1) Single-family dwelling ...............•..... SO ft.
(2) Medium density dwelling (See R-2
District
Regulations.
(3) All o ther permitted principal uses ......... None
k. Maximum height of buildin~.
(1)
(2)
Si ngle -family and medium density dwellings •.•.•..
•........... 2-1/2 stories ................. 25 ft.
All other permitted principal uses .•..... five (5)
s tories plus garden level, but not higher than
sixty (60) feet. (Also see Supplemental Regula-
tions, 22.5-7.
1. Minimum front yard.
(1) All permitted principal uses:
Up to three tories .........•..........•.... 15 ft.
Four or fiv o ries ..•.................... 20 ft.
More han five stories ......•.•............• ZS ft.
•· Mini u side yard.
(1 ) ily d el lln . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . 3 ft.
(Tot 1 10' for both ide )
(2 ) M diu densi y ..•..•...•.............. See R-2 S c tion.
(3) All other p r ltted principal u e .....••.•• 15 ft.
d.
(1 ) All p ra1 ted pr1n p 1 u . .......•....••• 2S t.
o . 1niaum off · tr
( 22.S ·S) (Amn'd. by Ord .• o. 34, S ries of
1971)
.4 •
~
• .
• •
-
\ _,
•
•
•
•
p. Minimum off st reet loading requirements.
(See Supplementary Regulations)
q. Accessory buildings and permitted accessory uses.
(1) Private garages or carports. Private garages
or carports designed or used for the storage
of motor vehicle owned or operated by the
occupants of the principal buildi ng; however,
commercial vehi cle shall be limited to a
three -qua rter (3/4) on carryin ca pa c ity.
(Z)
(3)
(a) Maximu m hei h , in le-fa ily or medium
density ..... 1-1/2 tor ................ 15 ft.
High d ensi yd ell1n ... 3 tories ..... 35 ft.
(b) Minimum fron
Regulations. upplementary
(c) Side yard.............................. 3 ft.
if detached nd on rear one-third (1/3)
of lot.
(d) Rear yard.............................. 3 ft.
as, but no
hop , lift hop ,
nd d y c re cen •
n i nc of th
• •
' _,
•
•
•
0 I•
•
"ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDELINE S"
1. Solar and wind exposure.
Tall structures located adjacent to major open spaces
should be si ted t o insure maxj mum sunli ght on the
open spaces dur ing the winter months.
The grouping of tal l buildings should be sited to
allow for proper air circula t ion.
Tall buildings should b e sited up on the north side
of pedestrian spaces to provide protection from winter storms.
Wind bre aks s u ch as tree g roup i ng s should be provided
in all major open spaces.
2. Planting .
3.
Plant materials s hou ld be selec ed from varieties and
species that are acclimated for special climatic condi-
di ons found within the Englewood area. Attention should
be given to the size and character of ma terials which
will produce th e desired 1 ndscaped effec . Provisions
should be made for irrigation nd feeding sys tems and
plac ement for proper maintenance nd protection to insure
mature growth of the plant .
(a) Plant material should be arran ed in a manner to
complemen he ar c hitectural quali y of plaza areas.
(b ) De iduou tree hould be u
l l ow unl i h du r i ng t h e in plaza reas o
r on hs.
(a ) hou ld be e re n d fro pu lie ie
( ) aJOr
nd
de vie
. '-:;?'
'
•
......
\ J •
•
• •
Introduced, read in full and passed on first
reading on the 7th day of July, 1975.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 10th day of July, 1975.
Read by title and passed on final reading on the 4th day of Augus , 1975.
Published by title as Ordinance No.
Series of i975, on the 7th day of August, 1975.
MAYOR
ATTEST :
ex off1c10 Cit y Cl rt-Treasurer
1, illia D. J m , do hereby certif that
the abo e and foregoing is true, accurate and co•plete
copy of the Ordinance, p s ed on final readina and
publi sh d by i le Ordinance No. , Series of 1975.
·7·
• .
• •
-
\ ~
•
•
•
• •
-.v -
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COONCIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RECOMMENDATION OF nlE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: July 22, 1975
SUBJECT: Approval of Weaver/Wiebe Rezoning Reque1t.
RECOMMENDATION :
Parker aoved:
Wade seconded: The Planning Co11111ission recommend to City
Council the area bounded on the north by West
Union Avenue, on the east by South Clay Street extended, on
the louth by ihe Englewood /Littleton City Limits, and on the
west by South Decatur Street, be rezoned from R-1-C, Single-
faaily Residence, to R-2-B, Two-family Residence.
AYES: Smith ; Wade ; Brown ; Jor n on ; Martin ; Parker ; Pierson ;
NAYS: Jones
ABSENT : Tanguma
'nle motion carried.
R pectfully ubaitted,
By Ord r of the City Plannin
and Zonin Comaiasion •
5 D
• •
,
\ .>
•
•
•
•
CITY OF ENGLEWCX>D PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JULY 22, 1975
I. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular m ting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission
wa called to ord r by Chairman Martin at 7:00 p.m.
Me mbers present : Wade; Brown; Jones ; Jorgenson; Martin; Parker ;
Pierson; Smith
Supinger, Ex-officio
Members ab nt~ Tanguma
Alo present : A istant City Attorney Lee ; Associate Planner Hou e
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
Ir. lartin tated the finutes of June 17, 1975, were to be on id r d for approval.
Parker mov d:
Jorgen on second d: of June 17, 1975, approv d
\E : ad : Bro•n: Jon ; Jor en on; Martin; Park r: Pi r on mith
Th mot ion rr1 d.
JI I.
r. upin r
tr o h
CAS •19-75A
un 17, 1975
nt • •
\ _,
•
•
•
0 -
-~-
Mr. Supinger stated that the proposed amendments of the Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance are being consi dered at the Council
level, with a Public Hearing scheduled for August 4, 1975.
City Co uncil has passed the ' Bill for Ordinance on first reading ;
it would be possible for City Cou nc il to take action approving
the proposed amendments after the Public Hearing ; if this is
done, the new regulations co uld be effective 30 days following
publication. If this procedure is followed, there is no way
the proposed rezoning could be finalized prior to the date the
proposed amendments would be effective. Any development in
the area which is under consideration for rezoning would then
have to take place under the new regulations, which would re-
quire a Planned Development for any development over four units.
Landscaping and open space requirement s are set f orth, and the
proposed regulations are generally more stringent than the
current regulations . The Planned Development procedure would
also require a Public Hearing before the Planning Commission,
and possibly before City Council.
Discussion followed.
Parker moved :
Wade seconded: nie Planning Commission recommend to City
Council the ar a bounded on th north by West
Union Avenue, on the ea t by South Clay Stre t extended, on
the South by th Englewood /Littleton City Limit , and on the
we t by South Decatur Str et, b r zoned from R-1-C, Sin 1 -
family Resid nee, to R-2-B, Two-family R id nee.
AYES : Smith ; Wade; Brown; Jorgen on ; artin; Parker; Pierson
NAYS: Jone
ABSENT: TangU111a
1b motion carried.
IV.
Mr. Sup1ng r stat d
H arin on Jun 17 h
orm tion on
1. south Elati
V DU to
2. u h Zuni
U.S. 2 5.
3.
c tor
or
r .
l
in-
frOll Yal
an. Av nu to
rem an
tr ut
•
\ ./
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -1-
Staff Report Re:
•
-
REZONING REQUEST
Case #19-75
The rezoning of approximate ly 14 acres from R-1-C,
Single-family Resid n e e Di trict to R-2 -B, Two -family Residence Dis trict.
Date to be Considered:
June 17, 1975
Nam and Addre of Applicant:
o n r
B. L. Wannita R. Weaver
2714 est Union Av nue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Carl T. iebe
44 8 outh F deral Boulevard
Englewood , Colorado 0110
and Addre
H nry L. F i tn r
or ' r cord ho
in the ar a r qu
11012 h t ountain Road
un C1t , Arizon 5351
110
11
11
th follo in a
t d for r zoning :
• •
-
\ ,,
•
•
STAFF RE PORT
Page -2-
•
0 -
B. L . & Wannitta R. Weaver
2714 West Union Avenu e
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Relation of \pplicant to Request :
REZONING REQUEST
Case #19-75
B. L. & Wannitta Weaver are property owners and reside in the area requested for rezoning.
Mr. Wiebe has an interest in purchasing one or more parcels within the subject area .
Lo ation or Address of Proposal:
i
The ar a requ t d for rezoning 1 located in outh-
t Engl ood, south of Cente nn ial Park. 1be ubject ar a
bou nd d on th ~ t by Sou th D catur Str et, on the north
t nion Avenue, on th east by what would be South Clay
t xt nded, and on the outh by the Engle wo od/Litt! ton Limit . (Sc Vicinity ap)
by
Str
City
trict :
R-1-C, ingl -family R id nc .
cr1p ion of Requ t:
• •
-
\ .>
•
STAFF REPORT
P age -3-
...
-
REZONI NG REQ UEST
Case #19-75
2. The properties within the subject area are not
realistically developable und r the R-1-C Zone
District, because of the proximity to indu trially
zoned areas.
3. The area proposed for rezoning is more than "o n (1)
Ci ty block in area ", and therefore, complies with a
p licy previously established by the Ci ty.
4. The proposed med ium-density zoning would not be in
conflict with th Comprehen ive Plan .
5. '!be maximum poss1bl den ity permitted in the R-2-B
Zon e District could b a ccommodat d by tho e facilities
most dir ctly aff c t d, such a utilitie and police
and fire ervice .
6. There are commercial, edu ational and re rational
facilit ies within the imm dia area that cou ld meet
tho e need of th dd1tional popul ion that may come
about b cau e of the rezonin •
De cription of SubJ
• •
-
\ _,.
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -4-
0 -
REZONING REQU EST
Case #19-75
tion within the subject area at this time. Before any d v lop-
ment takes place within the area, access will have to be pro-
vided. This can b st be accomplished at the time the propert1es
are platted.
TI:le ar a it elf is very flat and open . There are
pres ntly seven oc upied hou es in the area, four o which
are on sites of one and one -h al1 acr or larger. The Parr
property, at the south end of the subject area, ha approximat ly
4.3 acres on which is the Parr' re idence and their sod far
Thi u e gives the effect of a large, land caped area wh n
the gra i r en, and i quit pl a sing. ~r. Parr u
his indu trially zoned property imm diately on the ea t .
of the Brown Ditch a a torage ar a for hi land cap bu.
r. Parr ha r c n ly acquir d veral properti ~ith1n t
1-1 ar a.
main
tabled on th Gre
Divi ion
rmitted a ax1
i tn r prop
\ ~
,
,
STAFF REPOR T
Pag e -5-
-
REZONING REQUEST
Case #19-75
Shortly after annexation, a request for rezoning from
R-1-A, Single-family Resi d ence, to .1-1, Light Industrial was
submitted by s ome of the property owne r in the area. Tbe
request was approved by th Co mmis sion, but tabled indefinitely
b the City Co uncil in December o1 1961, primarily because
persons within the area coul d not agree on the zoning .
Jn 1963, this area wa rezoned to R-1-C, i t present
z on i ng, a part of the adoption of the 1963 Comprehe nsive Zoni ng Ordinance.
In the sununer of 1964 , a small triangular-shaped
piece of the Parr property, ~hich lie ea t of the Brow n
Ditch and at a lower elevation than th prop rty to th ~ st
of the Ditch, was rezoned from R-1-C t o I-1, Ligh Industrial.
contacted th
in
zoning ar a.
•
\ _,
•
•
•
0 -
STAF F REPORT
Page -6-REZONING REQ UEST
Case #19-75
zoning. A staif report, Ca e =13-74, was presented t o the
Commi,si non June 4, 1974, as a fol low-up to that m eting.
No Cornmi.·sion action was taken on the report.
On M rc'l 25, 1975, Ir. Carl Wiebe applied for h
rezonin of thi area from R-1-to R-2-B. At that tim , it
was und r tood by the partment of Conununity De elopm nt
t ha t thl dpplir. nt had an agreem nt to purchase one o f th
prop rties in•luded in the rezoni ng area. However, at ~e
Public H ar1n b for the Planning and Zoning Commi sion on
May 13, 1 75, Mr. Broomhall of Sitefinders Realty , In . , who
repreRentPd Ir. Carl Wiebe, tated that he knew of no a r
m nt to purcha b twe n the applicant, r.Wiebe, and a y o1
th prop rty own<'r . Becau of this , the Commi ssion a
advi s d by As. is ant City Attorn y Lee that the Publ ic I . ring
shoul be ~lo. ed. r. Lee furth r advi cd that unti l h
tim a val1d application for rezoning wer made--an
tion fil d by orop rty owner ithin th ar a, or a p
hol din• an optio to pur ha prop rty within th ar a--h
hould not co n i d r d . It wa uggest d
pro p r ov.n
appJ 1ca t 1on
to R-2-B, TY.
po ing o
hav h
h ld 0
or mor of th prop rty owner in
pplication for r zoning, d that
Plan :
Pl n of
al u
Pl n
•
-
\ _,
STAFF REPORT
Page -7-
0 -I•
REZONING REQUEST
Case #1 9-75
Public Service Company -Electric Division: No objection.
Department of Utilities: The area in question, adjacent
to South Decatur, is a cces sible to water service, but not to gravity ewer service .
Water service is available in West Union and on South Deca ur.
Part of the area i in the Valley Sanitation Di trict;
however, th e nt ire would r quire lifting ewage to the
west, into Valley' Tha action would ne e itate
negotiating with th ion di trict.
The alt
ea t rly to the
con truct on th
ptic tanks i to carry ewa e
ptor that Littleton intend to
oi th South Platte Riv r.
• •
-
\ ..>
•
•
STA FF REPORT
P age -8-
•
-
REZONING REQUEST
c ase #1 9-75
the own l has b ~n old he pr ice that they fe lt neces ary to
high for ~i ngle-family land in that location.
th n , that cv lopm nt of the area into ing le-family
q. . may not be practical, especially when
1 n hib1t 1 v fina ncial climate prevailing at
Th d evelopme nt of thi generally open
1·)u ld po .. ibly b come attractive if th permitted
e . l.~htly, as would be the case if it
e r -2-B, a. reques ted.
acr
not platt d, it
b fore any d v lop en take
lling
for
pro id d 1u thin th<' area and ,
l 25 of th land in a d velop-
1 th thi in ind, c ould
ill b laid out, that ther
ford v lop nt an~ 3.5 acre
r-
\ • •
-
\ _,
C.
STA FF REPORT
Pag e -9-
•
• •
REZONING REQUEST
Case##l9-75
as being used by Mr. Parr together with the contiguous land,
al o owned by the Parrs , that was zoned I-1, Light Industrial.
Tile Co mmission and City Council agreed, following
p u bli c hearings, that the land was more properly zoned I-1.
Tile land in that area on both sides of the "straight
north -sou h line" is owned by Mr. and Mrs. Parr and at such
t i m a it is determined that the street can and should be
ext nded sou th into Littleton, the zoning applied to the land
will probab ly bave little effect on any arrangement that will
hav to be made to acquire the land from the Parr or any
future o ner. The Brown Ditch forms a natural line of d marca-
tion b tween the two unlike zon districts and thi till
app ars to be more feasibl than following a lin that can
only b identif ied on a map or in a legal description .
•
'
• •
,
I. I
•
•
•
• Area
;' I J
~ -, ..
~
'9 1
!_!_....!.!.! '
AVE , -r-, o o : D
ro I Perr .. ,
, '
:,
'~ i.
___.: • Bus so r d
'
I-I Ligh t Industrial
A Mbler
.. -:-.
~1
• 1
I
r--
1
L--
D
Conf1e ld
·j. ' ;\• • ~ fl Porr WI 1-------------------------
~ .: Parr , _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Light Industrial i
Cl1r.Qer
I
I
t-,
I •
;:
/:
I I ). ' • \ _ _.. _ _t_I .!.J• •L.1...1..J.-.-..-•.1. \ ~ l •O• --~: ---~ '1 '
scole J"; 2 00'
Oeportmenl of Communit y ue velopme nf
mb 5-75
I
;
r I •
\
\
...
,
•
•
":'
t CINIT Y MAP ~ Weav er -Weibe rt!q uest ~ : 1r1~
\
~ from R-1-C to R-2-8
¥~
ANf\.JEXE D AREA .
Cl & "' ..
1-1 LiQht Industrial
,.,.
... 0 1111
R: 1-Et,1 ; '.
. ~1n9l,,~1J2ily I .. , :;
Res
• S ••t !~A ._,,,,
' .
8 -2
~ B usiness
al 0 · ~I w 6j (B us i ness) z .
WI
... ',\~N
. ARE A REQUESTED
FOR REZON ING
, .
1-1
L ight lnpustriol
-~ llnd-1S l 'IOI)
scale i''-400
~v :.,
"'-.. >
1
I
~~
" ~
·~
I
~
Dept of Commun i!~ O!!Vt!IOt'l'CL'll n t : ( i ••
,
,,,.
I 0 •
'#
\
•
\ _, . 0
•
3 c
nR011u c r:u AS A R l LL B . cou CI LMA ' BRO\\ .
BY AIJT'iORITY
OR1H 'i\"lfF O . 3Z. , SEPIE Cl 197.
AN
26,
I~G
l'i, THFRrFOR ,
0 THE CITY F E.'GLF. 0 D, CJT COU 'CIL
~_Et 'on 1.
Tha "ection 22.8 ('f :'.onin
Ordinance, bc111~ Ordinance .'o. ~o. rie i 1963 a amended
cntitl<'J "O fin1 ion " i hereby am ndt>rl 1n part o cad as follow . :
Th t portion of the lot
nd -..: . <;Or) build t n ~ • occ 1p1 d hy
her,
• •
• -
\ I• -
• •
-
•
•
0 I •
•
Floor area: The area of a building measured from the center
of the walls, but not incl uding courts, open porches, garages,
cellars, or basement s , whether finished or unfinished.
Lot coverage: That percen tage of the lot area which may be
occupied by buildings and/or structures. Carports, garages
and parking structures shall no be included in lot coverage.
Lot 1 ine, £1 The hortest lot f rontage.
Section 2.
That Section 22. 8 en i tled "Definitions" of the
Compr hens1ve Zoning Ordinance, bein~ Ordinance o. 26,
Series of 1963 as amended, i hereby further amended by
adding the following new definitions there o:
Da~ car center: An ag nc , or aniza ion, or individual pro-
vi ing day irne care of five or mor children not rela ed by
blood or m rr ag o, or not h le al wards or foster children
of, th endant dult. C re of wo or more children is not
perm1tt d unl . s currcn ly lie n~ d by he S a e.
build in
carri s o hi~
An un ·cu
buildin
re nd vines, ith o her dee -
in which a person transac
tated o cup ion.
his
op n o the y on the same
·2 ·
r ing
ure.
'
• •
-
\ ...
-
'
I
•
•
• t• -
Useable open space: On ite space which is absen of any build-
ing or struc ure. Open space could contain, but is not limited
to the following: sidewalks, trellises, swings, arbors,
swimming pools, tennis cour s, and landscaping. Surface parking
is not o be con idere d as useable open space.
Introduced, read in full and passed on firs t reading on th e 7th d y of July , 1975.
Published a a Bill for an Ordinanc on the 10th day of Juiy, 19 S.
h Read by tit le and pa se d on final reading on
4 h day of Ag st, 19 S.
Publi h d b ·
Series of 1. 75, on he.
ATTL T:
itle a· Ordinance o.
th day of u ust , 1975.
MAYOR
e 0 lClO l t r • rea ure
certify tha
e and co ple e
di ng and ---, s ri of
•.
'
• •
\ -'
•
•
• •
•
0 I • -
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN BROW
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCF 0 . , SERI~S OF 1 9 75
AN ORO IN . CF AMENDl G SECTION 22. 8 ENTITLED "DEFINITIONS",
OF THE CO MPRFHE SIVE ;:o, I G ORDINA CE (ORDI A CE NO. 26,
SFRIE OF 1'l63, AS AMFNDFO) BY REVIS!. 'G AND A.ME DI G
CERTAIN DEFI\ ITIO. S CO TAI ED I 1 AID 5ECTIO 1 A D ADDING
'EW DEFL ITJO, S THFRETO.
NOW, THERFFORE, BE IT ORDAi FD BY THE CITY COU CIL
OF THE ClTY OF ENGLEvOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
That Sec ion 22. of the Comprehensive Zoning
OrJin nee , hein Ordinance ~o. 26, Seri s of 1963 as ame nd ed
entitled "Defini ion " is hcreb amend d in part to read a s follows:
BuilJrng area : I h.n portion of th lot h t is occupied by
the principal and accessory buildin~s.
common
11, an d
i.-hi ch i
of ch o h r ,
nd
0
lOn
h • •
\ ..>
•
•
•
I• -
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COU NC ILMAN BROW
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCF ~O , SER IES OF 1975
AN ORDIN NCE AMENDING SE CTION 22.8 ENTITLED "DEFINITIO S",
OF TH E COMPREHENS IV E ZON ING ORDINA . CE (ORDINANCE NO. 26,
SFRIES OF 1963, S AMENDFD) BY REVI SL G AND AMEN DING
CERTAI DEFI~ITIO~S CO TAI ED I AID SE CTION AND ADDIN G
FW DEFlNlTIO.S THFRFTO.
NO~, THERFFORE, BE IT OR DAI N D BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLE OOD, CO LORAD O, as follo ws:
Secti on 1.
That Section 22.8 of the Comp r ehen ive Zoni ng
Ordinance, being Ordin anc e. o. 26, eries of 1963 a _ ame nded
enti tle d "Dcfiniti ns" is hereby amended in par t to read
as follows:
Building area: That por tion of th lot hat is occupied by
he principal and accessory buildinRs.
Building, hei ht of: Th vertical dis ance measured from he
adjoining curh lev el to the highest poi n of c i ling of the
top s tory in th cas of a flat roof ; o th e deck line o a
ma nsard r o ; and to he top of the highe: poi nt of a gable,
hip, or amhr l roof; provi ing, howev l, hat wher buil ding s
are se back from he s ree line , h cigh of h bu ildi ng
may be m~1sur d rm h av rag levat1on of h finished
l o t rad aJon front lin of th huild1 g.
i
ch o her,
, and
1on 1
hl!I
'
• •
\ .,,
•
•
-
Floor area: The are a of a building measured from the center
of the wall s , but not including courts, open porches, garages,
cellars, or basements, whe ther fi nished or unfini s hed.
Lot coverage: That percen tage of the lot area which may be
occupied by buildings and/or structures. Carports, garages
and parkin g s tru cture s shall not be included in lot coverage.
Lot l i ne, fr 11 The shortes t lot frontage .
Section 2.
That Sec ion 22 .8 enti tl ed "Defin itions" of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance , being Ord inance No. 26 ,
Series of 1963 as ame n ded, is hereby fur the r amended by
adding the following new de fini tions ther to:
Da~ care cen ter : An agency, o rgan ization, or in d ividual pro-
vi ing day ime care of five or more childr en not related by
blood or marr1age to, or not the legal wards or fos ter chil dren
of, the attendant adult. Care of two or more children is not
permi ted unl ss currently licen ed by h e ate.
Land sc ap i ng : Grass, shrubs, tre s and vines, with other dec-
orative mat erial.
Office: A room or building in which a person tr nsacts his
business or carries o n his stated occupation.
Open space: n unoccu ied pace open to the
lot with th e building.
y on the same
• •
\ .>
•
• •
..
Useable open space: On site s pace which is absen of any bui l d-
ing or structure. Open space could contain, but is not limi ted
to the following: sidewa lk s , trellises, swings , arbors,
swimm ing pools, tenn i s courts , and landscapi n g . Surface p a rking
is no t o be considered a s u s eable open space.
Introdu ced, read in full a nd passed on first
read ing on the 7th day of July, 1975.
Publi shed a a Bill for an Ordi n a n ce on h
10 t h day of July, 1 975.
Read by tit l and pas se d on final read ing on
t he 4th day of Augu st , 1975 .
Publi hed by itle as Ordinance No.
Series of 1 975 , o n he 7th day of August, 1975.
TTEST:
ex o ic10 .it •
l,
he ab ove an or
cop· of the Ord in
pub l i h t b ti l
1 975.
fAYOR
surer
of
• .
• •
\ ....
•
•
•
l NTRODUCED AS A Bl LL BY COUNCIL~tA. BROWN
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANIF 0. , SERIES OF 1975
A ORDINANCE 1ENDING SECTION 22. 8 E TITLED "DEFINITIO S",
OF THE COMPRl:.HE SIVE ZONI G ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 26,
SF.RTES OF 1%3, AS AME 'DED) BY REVISING AND AMENDING
CERTAI DEFJ. ITIO.'S CONTAINED IN SAID SECTTO AND ADDI G
~f DfFI ITr~·~ THERETO.
NOW, TH[REF0RE, BE IT ORDAL FD RY TH CITY COU ClL
Of' THF. C ITY OF El'IGLF\\000, COLO RADO, as fo,lows:
c ion 1.
T~a Section 22. of th Comprehensive Zoning
Or in nc , being Ordi nanc 'o. 26, Seri s of 1963 a mended
ntJtl d "Definition." is hereby amended in part o read
f llow
1ha portion of h lo tha
nd acce. ory bu1ld1n s.
occup1 d by
r •
1 • •
,
\ _,
•
•
•
•
I• -
Floor area: The area of a building measured from the ce nter
of the walls, bu t not inc luding courts, open porche s , garages,
cellars, or basements , whether finished or unfinished.
Lot coverage: That perce ntage of th e lot area which may be
occupied by buildings a nd/or structures. Carports, garages
and parking stru ctures shall not be included in lot coverage.
Lot lin e , f u The s hortest lot fro ntage.
Section 2.
Tha Section 22. 8 entitled "Definitions" of the
Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance , bein g Ordinance No. 26,
Series of 1963 a amended, is hereby further amended by
adding the following new defi n itions thereto:
Da~ car cent r: An ag ncy, organization, or individual pro-
v1 ing day time care of five or mor e children not related by
b l ood or marriag o, or not the legal wards or foster children
of, th attendant adult. Care of wo or more child ren is not
permitted unless curr n ly lie nsed by he Sate.
Landscaping: Grass, shrubs, tree
orati e ma erial.
nd vines, ith other dee-
Office: room or building in which a person ra nsacts his
bu siness or carri s on his stated occup ion.
Op en space: n unoccupied pace open o he s y on the ame
lot with th e building .
·2 ·
• •
\ J
•
•
• -
Useab le open space: On site space which is absent of any build -
ing or s tructure. Open sp ace could contain , but is not limited
to the following: sidewalks, trellis~s, s wings, ar bors ,
swimming poo ls, tennis cou rt s , and landsc aping . Su rface par k ing
i s not to be considered a s useable open s pace.
Introduced, read in full and pas se d on fi rst
reading o n th e 7 h day of J ul y , 1975.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinanc e on the
10th day of Juiy, 19 75.
Read by titl e a nd passed on fi nal reading on
the 4th day of August, 1975.
Published by tjtle a Ordinance o.
Series of 1975, on the 7th day of Au us , 1975.
ATTE ST:
ex o
th bo \
copy
MYOR
publ o.
l97S.
e o
of
ea urer
• •
-
\ _,
•
0
•
-11-
MEMORAND M TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION .
DATE : July 22, 1975
SUBJECT : Amendment to Master Street Plan Section of the
Comprehensive Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
Jones moved :
Smith seconded : The proposed amendment to the Master Street
Plan be further amended by deleting changes
p1·opo.ed for South Elati Street, South Zuni Street, South T jon
Str t, W t Union Avenue, and the Columbine Freeway Corridor.
Yal v nu
2 5
nded Master Streat Plan amendment, then, i a
Remov desi g nation a an
"Ar t rial'' from Broadway to
Federal ; designate a a
"Co llector" from Broadway to
Ela ti.
Chang de i g nation from a
"Fr way"to that of an "A rt rial."
Ch n n go Av nu
Loll 11 u 1 va rd
in It na r ·tr t
Huron
Conti nu e "Colle tor " d ignation
ea t to South Logan Str t and
~ t from Bannock to Huron.
" oll tor ".
ctor "
rial "
r "
tor"
• •
\ _,
•
0 -
-:t-
Mr. Supinger stated that the proposed amendmen ts of the Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance are being considered at the Council
level, with a Public Hearing scheduled for August 4, 1975.
City Council has passed the· Bill for Ordinance on first reading;
it would be possible for City Council to take action approving
the proposed amendments after the Public Hearing ; if this is
done, the new regulations could be effective 30 days following
publication. If this procedure is followed, there is no way
the proposed rezoning could be finalized prior to the date the
proposed amendments would be effective. Any development in
the area which is under consideration for rezoning would then
have to take place under the new regulations, which would re-
quire a Planned Development for any development over four units.
Landscaping and open space requirements are set forth, and the
proposed regulations are generally more stringent than the
current regulations. The Planned Development procedure would
also require a Public Hearing before the Planning Commission,
and possibly before City Council.
Discussion followed.
Parker moved :
Wade seconded: nte Planning C011J11ission recommend to City
Council the area bounded on the north by West
Union Avenue, on the east by South Clay Street extended, on
the South by the Englewood/Littleton City Limits, and on the
west by South Decatur Street, be rezoned from R-1-C, Single-
fBJ11ily Reaid nee, to R-2-B, Two-family Residence.
AYES: Smith; Wade ; Brown ; Jorgen on; Martin; Parker; Pierson
NAYS : Jones
ABSENT : Tanguaa
1\le motion carried.
IV. MASTER STREET PLAN AMENDMENTS CASE #20-75A
Jun 17, 1975
llr. Supin r etat d thi aatt r wa continu d froa tb Public
R ar nr nn Jun 17th to allo for provision of additional in-
formation on v ral o th prop d d si nation
l. South Ela ti Str d a a coll ctor froa Yal
Avenu to nu .
2. pro po d • an art rial 0
3. d coll ctor roa va
Av nu ... 0 ay Corridor.
s . an ar rill tr
ul rd.
1n ,.. on o t a
• •
-
\ ....
•
•
-. .l.l-
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEW OOD CITY COUN CIL REGARDING ACTI ON OR
RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION .
DATE : July 22, 1975
S BJECT : Amendment to Ma ter Street Plan S ection of the
Comprehen ive Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
Jones mov d :
Smith s cond d: The propo ed amendment to the Master Street
Plan b furth r amended by deleting c han g s
propo. ed for South Ela ti Str t, South Zuni Street, South T jon
Str t, W t Union Avenu , and the Co lumbine Freeway Corridor.
Th re mm nd d Ma t r St re t Plan amendment, then, 1 a
follo11<s:
YaJ Av nu
2 5
R mov d ignation a an
"Art rial" from Broadwa y to
F d ral ; d ignat a a
"Collector" from Broadwa to
Ela ti.
Cha ng d i nation from a
5 c-~
''Fr way"to that of an "Art rial."
Ch n ngo Av nu
Lo11 11 Soul var
P latt Riv r Dr1v
t.
Huron tr t t
Continu "Coll tor'' d igna tion
ea t to South Logan Str and
we t from Bannock to Huron.
De igna t a a "Coll tor ".
D v
to
t
d igna lion a a "Coll ctor"
of W t Dartmouth v nu
rial ''
ol l tor "
11 vi
or " Ir
• •
,
-
\ ..>
•
•
AYES : Pi e rson; Smith ;
Martin ; Parker
NAYS: None
ABSENT : None
1be metion carried.
•
0
•
Tanguma ; Wade ; Brown; Jones; Jorgenson ;
Respectfully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission .
'
• •
\ J
•
•
•
•
•
0
•
-:t-
Mr. Supinger stated that the proposed amendments of the Compre-
hensive Zoning Ordinance are being considered at the Council
level, with a Public Hearing scheduled for August 4, 1975.
City Council has passed the ' Bill for Ordinance on first reading;
it would be possible for City Council to take action approving
the proposed amendments after the Public Hearing ; if this is
done, the new regulations could be effective 30 days following
publication. If this procedure is followed, there is no way
the proposed rezoning could be finalized prior to the date the
proposed amendments would be effective. Any development in
the area which is under consideration for rezoning would then
have to take place under the new regulations, which would re-
quire a Planned Development for any development over four units.
Landscaping and open space requirements are set forth, and the
proposed regulations are generally more stringent than the
current regulations. The Planned Development procedure would
also require a Public Hearing before the Planning C0111111ission,
and possibly before City Council.
Discussion followed.
Parker moved:
Wade seconded: nie Planning Col'lllllission rec0111111end to City
Council the area bounded on the north by West
Union Avenue, on the east by South Clay Street extended, on
the South by the Englewood/Littleton City Limits, and on the
west by South Decatur Street, be rezoned from R-1-C, Single-
family Residence, to R-2-B, Two-family Re idence .
AYES : Smith ; Wade; Brown; Jorgen on ; Martin ; Parker ; Pierson
NAYS : Jones
ABSENT : Tanguaa
nie motion carried.
IV. KASTER STREET PLAN AMENDMENTS CAS #20-75A
Jun 17, 1975
Mr. Suping r atat d this aatter wa s c ontinu d f rom tbe Publi c
~Par i n~ nn June 17th to allow for provi i on o f addi ional in-
f orm tion on v ral o l th e propo d d ign i on
l . South Elati Str t -p ropo d a a coll c t or lroa Yal
Av nu to K n yo n Av nu •
2. u h Zuni -propo d a an art r al u .• 2 5.
3. outb T jon tr t -proPo d
Av nu to D rtaou h Av nu • ...
s.
tion o
a coll or r e. va
y Corri or .
0
0
•
-
\ .>
•
0
•
-3-
Mr. Mar tin ask d what effect the exclusion of the Columbine
Freeway corridor designation might have?
Mr . Tanguma e ntered and took his place with the Commission.
Mr. uping r tated he felt it was unlikely a freeway would b
lo ated i n this c orridor for a long time; he stated that re-
garding th te c hnical aspects on Federal funding, he did not
know what the effect might be.
Mr. Martin asked if development could take place in the corridor
s u h as large warehouse complexes? Mr. Supinger stated that
dev lopment has taken place, and is taking place now. Di cus ion
1ollow d. Mr .. Supinger stated "it wouldn't hurt anything to
1 ave it on " th master treet plan designations .
Mr. Jo n further discussed the corridor designation, and
stat d that h designation should not re-
main on th
Ir. Mar t in questioned the necessit • of a traffi ·control ignal
2 5 and South Zuni Street at suc h time a the treet
a
Jon
J ur t h r
b xt nd d and improved to an arterial tatus? H
it e m d to him that w are trying to treat .S . 2 5
additional ignalization this i
a "freeway". H a k d if thi wa
in th taJ r r comm nd lion tha
ctor t ralh r than red ig nat n g it
Pl n
ta bl
1· on ; i th ; T n •uma ; ad : Bro n : Jon
I rl n
d.
n foll
• •
\ ,
•
I • -
-4-
Jone s moved:
Smith seconded: The proposed amendment to the Master Street
Plan be furth r amended by deleting changes
proposed f or South Elati Street, South Zuni Stree t, South Tejon
Street, West Union Avenue, and the Columbi ne Freeway Corri d or .
The recommended Master Street Plan amendment, then, is as follows:
Yale Avenue
u. s. 2 5
Chen ango Av nu
Lowell Boul vard
Platte River Drives
t
Huron Str t
fo x tr t
ar tr t
d.
Remove designation as an
"A rterial" from Broa dway to
Federal; designate as a
"Co llector" from Broadway to
Elati.
Change designation from a
"Fr eway" to that of an
"Arterial".
Con inue "Collector" designation
st to South Logan Street and
~t from Bannock to Hu ron.
D ignate as a "Collector".
de ignation as a "Col lector"
of W Dartmouth Av nue .
D \l'r de ·i nation as an "Art rial"
o tr t alignm nt be-
w and Oxford.
a "Col lector" be-
and B 11 vi w.
a "Co ll ctor"
B 11 Vl ••
"Co ll tor" from
Vl W.
n
'
• •
\ -'
•
•
•
-
l 1 ~ (
-5-
Mrs. Martha Scott · )
3231 South Elati Street -stated that the citi~~ns who live in
,the 3100 and 3200 blc~ks of South
Elati Street appreciate the efforts the Planni~ and Zoning
Commission have exerted in their behalf. Mrs. l:>cott stated
that the residents understand that it is a moral obligation
and not a legal obligation, and she felt the residents would
understand the removal of the island if it was determined
absolutely necessary. Mrs. Scott stated she did not believe
the island is a hindrance to the fire and police vehicles,
however, as she has seen them go around the island. Mrs, Scott
again expressed appreciation for the cooperation from the
Commission in preserving the residential character of the
neighhorhood ..
Mr. Martin tated that he appreciated the citizen participation
displayed by the residents of the area in this matter.
Discussion followed.
The vote wa called.
AYES: Pierson; Smith ; Tanguma; Wade; Brown; Jones; Jorgenson;
Martin; Parker
AYS: None
ABSENT: None
111e motion carried.
V. COMPREHE SIVE ZONING ORDINANCE CASE #21-75
Definition of "Party Wall"
Ir. Suping r tated that a copy of a propo definition of
"Party Wall" ha be n ubmitt d to th Plann n Cammi &ion.
111i propo d d finition would be an am ndlft nt to th Compr -
h n iv Zoning Ordinanc , and will n c itate a Public H arin
111 propo ed d finition as inadvert ntly omitt d from th
propo d am ndm nt on th R-2 and R-3 D trict , and it is
f lt th t th ct fin tion 1 n d d.
r. Supin • 1· off r d a minor m ndm nt to th propo d d fin1 ti on,
o that th d fin tion would r ad:
pro d, nd PU 11 II r n l
'
• •
-
\ ....
.·
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -1-
Staff Report re :
•
0
•
I •
MASTER STREET PLAN
Case #20-75
An amendment to the .laster Street Plan section of the
Englewood, Color a do Comprehen sive Plan, Resolut ion #28, Series
of 1969, regarding reclassification o f certain streets, avenues
and highway .
Date to idered:
June 17, 1975
Action Initiat d By :
The Ci ty Plann1n and Zoning Commi ion.
Descri pt ion of Reques :
At
and Zoning
Yal Av nu
u. s. 2 5
TU t Av nu /Union A nu
nu
Zuni
I n tr
o an "Art rial ".
" rt rl l '
ral.
11 t r".
ro
ti on
nd
~
.
• •
-
\ ..>
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -2-
Platte River Drive
Columbine Fre ~ay Corridor
Windermere Str et
Huron Stre t
Fox Stre t
Elati Str
Dela ar Str et
j 11
Plan r 111 in un
A opy
of th Pl n •
of tl11
l.
2.
•
0
•
MASTER STREET PLAN
Case #20-75
lete designation as a "Collector"
outh of West Dartmouth Avenue.
Delete.
Div rt designation as an
"Arterial" to Navajo Street
alignment between Tufts and
Oxford.
D i nate as a "Coll ctor" be-
tween Quincy and Belleview.
R
b a "Col le tor"
Belleview.
ignat as a "Collector" between
Yal and K nyon.
ignate as a "Coll ctor" rom
K nyon to B 11 view
1n th adopt d
n t la t r Str
b am nd d, ar
r Str t
nd a copy
a a part
nt to
with a
nda ti on
d
• •
\ ..
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -3-
•
0
•
t •
MASTER STREE T PLA N
Ca se #20 -75
Background oi Pr v i o us City A tlon Related to the Master Stree t
Pla n :
Th pr sent la s t r Street Plan, a section of the Engle-
wood Compr hen i\ Plan adopted in 1969, is th re ult of several
studie und r taken b • th City taJf ove r a ten-year period.
The fir t M st r Street Plan for the City of En g l ewood
of which we have any re ord was prepared by form r City En ginee r
N il Bard Thi Plan wa r f rr d to the City Council, but
no r cord can b fou n d that th Plan wa adopt d and reco rded .
Th Bard Pla n was dir c ted primarily to roadway an d righ t -o f -
way width nder Planning and Traffic Dir ctor Joe Lacy,
b ginni n g in 195 , work was b gun on th Com pr hensiv n ~n
known a "Englewood Tomorrow ". Th tre t patt rn in th Co re
Ar a as the principal 1 u o1 th Plan at that tim a n d no
c tion o1 th Plan was ev r adop d. Following Lacy, Pla n ni n g
and Traffi Director Dav1d lunn. dir ct d rk o n th ompre h e n-
rcf rr d to a th "Gu1d for Growt ", duri n g his
no e c t1on of th "Guide for Gro-wth" wa
Commis . i on or Council.
Th pr ent
, th r ult
ion, Plannin
th l ty
~
.
• •
\ ~
I
•
STAFF REPORT
Pa ge -4-
...
0
•
MASTER STREET PLAN
Case #20-75
staff. The r sults of that meeting are represented in the
propos e~ am ndm nt to the Master Street Plan.
The Comprehensiv Plan :
to et
act as
Th
of
for
t
'
• •
\ ,
•
•
S TAFF REPORT
Page -6-
-
0 -I•
MASTER S TREET PLAN
Case #20-75
4. Chenango Avenue has been extended as a Collector from
South Bannock Street to South Huron Street and from South
Sherman Street to South Logan Street. This creates an exte n ded
east/west collector on Ch nango Avenue from South Logan Stree t ,
an Arterial, to South Huron Street, a Collector. It is a
Collector in the present Plan from South Bannock Street to
South Sherman Street.
Low 11 Boul vard north of West Bell view Avenue h a s
1gnated as a oll tor. The present traffic flow
that of a lo c al t l v 1.
6.
ha b
7 . SouthTjonStr
Arteri l to a Coll ctor ,
Str t.
at a
th
oll
In · t ,
at ti 1
acqu1r
h that City
t that
hang d in tat u · fro an
mpha i on Sout h Zuni
t
•
•
......
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -7-
• •
Comments from Other Departments:
MAS TER STREET PLAN
Case #20-75
The City Planning and Zoning Commission and the
Department of Community Development have worked closely with
the Department of Public Works in identifying those areas of
the Master Street Plan which need to be revised. Consideration
has been gi ven to the need of all City Departments in making
the suggested changes.
• •
•
•
•
ADDENDUM 'IU STAFF REPORT
Page -1-
0 -
MASTER STREET PLAN
Case #20-75
At the Public Hearing held by the City Planning and Zoning
Commission on June 17, 1975, a proposed amendment to the
Master Street Plan was discussed, 1bose speaking in opposition
to certain proposed street designations argued their view
points significantly enough to encourage the Commission to
request additional information relative to several of the
proposed designations .
1be two principal changes involved South Elati Street, which
is proposed to be designated a Collector Street from West
Kenyon Avenue .to West Yale Avenue, and South Zuni Street,
which is proposed to be changed from a Collector to an Arterial street.
Another change was suggested by Commission member Mae Wade
in regard to the proposal to designate West Union Avenue as
an Arterial rather than as a Collector . Mrs. Wade suggested
it retain the present Collector status.
'Ihe Freeway Corridor designation was also discu sed at the
Public Hearing by Mr. Douglas Shaffer of the Colorado Division
of Highways . Mr. Shaffer questioned the proPosed eliaination
of the Freeway designation, hich i pr ntly ho n in the
South Platt Ri v e r -Santa Fe Driv Corridor.
Becau of th qu tion rais d about thes ••tter , th Coa-
mis ion vot d i n f avor o f tablin th matt r o f th Ma ter
Str t Plan aa nda nt until th n xt r ular ting in order
to uppl m nt th i r i n f ormation.
tor Str
• •
-
' ,
ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT
Page -2-
-
0 -
MASTER STREET PLAN
Case #20-75
1. To provide a Plan for the development of West Floyd
Avenue, which Plan the Shopping Center developer was to implement;
and
2. To assure people living north of West Floyd Avenue
that traffic from the Center would not be able to go on any
of the streets west of South Bannock Street with the exception
of South Fox Street.
'lbe agreement was felt to be a definite moral co .. it-
ment to the people by the City---if not a legal commitaent.
'lbe designation of South Elati Street as a Collector
in the proposed amendment was done primarily to facilitate
movement of Police and Fire vehicles to the north area of the
City from the Police/Fire Center at South Elati Street and
West Jefferson Avenue. Removal of the island would mean the
Police and Fire vehicles could travel north on South Elati
Street un-impeded. Fire Chief Haailton explains in the en-
closed letter that South Elati Street is the most expedient
response route on which to get emergency equipment into the
north di trict. Chief Hamilton feels there is an urgent need
to remove the i land at West Floyd Avenue and South Elati
Street.
Al o in upport of removin th traffic island is
Acting Olief of Police Robert Morgan. Chief Morgan tates
that the traffic island should be reaoved and the intersection
ignaliz d in order to eliminate the dang rou ituation
and provide for a much aoother flo o traffic. A copy of
Chief Morgan' l tt r i attached for your information.
o n z nu to
u .. Jh tor r011
t
I) D
a 0
fr011
va A d nu
'
•
-
' .
•
ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT
Page -3-
•
-
MASTER STREET PLAN
Case #20-75
amendment to the Master Street Plan would reverse these two
designations, making South Zuni Street an Arterial and South
l'e jon Street a Collector. South Zuni Street is proposed to
be extended to U.S. 285, at which intersection it is assumed
there would be signalization.
In a letter dated June 24, 1975, Mr. Allan Canter,
Director of Planning for the City and County of Denver,
states that South Zuni Street is designated on Denver's current
Comprehensive Plan as a local street from West Evans to West
Dartmouth Averwe. A copy of Mr. Canter's letter is enclosed.
Mr. Jim Paddock, Planning Consultant to the City of
Sher idan, reports that the Sheridan Master Plan projects South
Zuni Street being opened through to U.S. 285. Mr. Paddock bas
stated, however, that in discussions with the Highway Department,
they have not agreed to signalization at the intersection of
South Zuni Street with U.S . 285. The Highway Department has
agreed to right-turning movements only from U.S. 285 onto
South Zuni Street and from South Zuni Street onto U.S. 285.
Another question which the Commission asked be addressed
was whether or not the change in designation to an Arterial
would make it possible to receive additional funding from the
fed eral Aid-Urban Sy tem?
Director of
the pres nt time,
Federal Aid-Urban
shown for arterial
to be in short
n to thos
• •
' •'
ADDENDUM 'lU STAFF REPORT
Page -4-
•'·
•
-
MASTER STREET PLAN
Case #20-75
WEST UNION AVENUE as an Arterial from South Santa Fe Drive
to South Federal Boulevard.
Ms. Wade suggested that the West Union Avenue designa-
tion as an Arterial be reconsidered . She felt that the street
would better be designated as a Collector rather than an
Arterial since it goes into a residential area west of South
Decatur Street and adjacent to Centennial Park.
No data substantiating this change of designation is
available.
FREEWAY CORRIDOR EXCLUSION.
Mr. Douglas Shaffer of the Colorado Division of
Highways was present at the Public Hearing and questioned
why the designation of the Freeway Corridor had not been
included in the proposed Master Street Plan amendment? He
stated that studies have shown there is a need for a Freeway
in this corridor.
The elimination of the Freeway Corridor in the pro-
posed amendment wa uggested because State and Regional plans
for the Freeway had not been finalized. It was felt that the
Corridor could be added at such time as State and Regional
plans for the Freeway are resolved.
Al o related to this is the re ponse by Mr. Allan
Canter, Director of Planning for th City and County of
Denver. In his 1 tter explaining any variances or siailaritiee
bet een th propo d aaendment of th En 1 wood Master Str t
Plan and the City and County of D nver Coapr hensiv Plan,
Mr. Ca nt r cit that th Columbin Fr way Corridor is not
d ignat d in th ir Plan.
Pursuant to th Public H arin , th
Ca.aun ity Developm nt co ntacted th
Hi hway The taff wa
ay in this corridor will
on of
n ly
and
Corridor baa not
tha i hould n
t Pl n.
a-••
• •
-' ,
•
•
ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT
Page -5-
•
0 -
Recommendations by the Planning Division:
MASTER STREET PLAN
Case #20-75
SOUTH ELATI STREET from West Yale Avenue to We st
Kenyon Avenue .
Wishing to honor the commi tment made to the residents
of the 3100 and 3200 blocks of South Elati Street to keep
traffic from the commercial area from using that street in those
two blocks, the staff recommend s that South Elati Street remain
as a local street as presently designated on the Kaster Street
Plan. It does.so in the interests of preserving the quiet,
residential character of South Elati Street north of Floyd
Avenue. 'lbe staff recognizes the inconvenience this creates
for the Fire and Police Department sin ce the building housing
the e two departments has been moved from its former location.
'lbe moral c o111111ittment made in good faith by previous Planning
Com.mission and City Coun cil mem ber is f oremost in our con-
siderat ion. If the only new traffic to be introduced into
these two blocks would be the emerge ncy v eh icles, it would be
a different matter. 'Ibis is no t the case, however.
'lbe staff is also mindful of the fact that the Fire-
Polic e building may, in the futur , be relocated to a ye t to
be d termined site to th ea t of South Broadway to bett r
serve the northeast section of th City. W re the island to
be removed and the Fire/Police station to be once again re-
loca t d, it would seem unlik ly that th traffic island would
be reinstalled.
'· SOOnt ZUNI STREET nd SOUTH TEJ ON STREE T.
Th
Tejon Str
and an Art
r1
t and outh
as a Coll c to r
:,
• •
-
ADDENOOM TO STAFF REPORT
Page -6-
WEST UNION AVENUE.
•
• •
t•
MASTER STREET PLAN
Case #20-75
The staff recommends that the designation of West
Union Avenue not be changed to an Arterial from South Santa
Fe Drive to South Federal Boulevard, but remain as a Collector.
Until such time ·as West Union Avenue can be extended
east to South Windermere Street across South Santa Fe Drive,
thus eliminating the off-set between West Union Avenue and
West Tufts Avenue; it would seem that whether the designation
be a "Collector" or an "Arterial" is a matter of semantics.
At such time as the off-set intersection of South Santa Fe
Drive with West Tufts Avenue/West Union Avenue can be corrected
and the street plan to the east of South Santa Fe Drive im-
plemented, it would not be deemed necessary to change the
designation of West Union Avenue.
FREEWAY CORRIDOR,
The staff recoaaends that the Freeway Corridor
designation not be eliminated. From discussions with the
Highway Department representatives, we are of the opinion
that this is still very much in the long-range plans. Until
such time as these plans are finalized, there would seem to
be no rea on for the City to eliminate this corridor.
•.
'
• •
,
\ J
•
•
• I•
•
ADDENDUM TO STAFF REPORT {II) MASTER STREET PLAN
Sine the addendum to this staff report was written,
the staff ha received the foll owing information froa llr.
Robert Frii , Transportation Planner for the Denver Regional
Council of Governments.
Mr. Friis reports that South Zuni Street is on the
Urban System at the present time, and it would make no
difference whether it be designated in the Comprehensive Plan
as a Collector or an Arterial.
West Union Avenue between South Federal Boulevard
and South Santa Fe Drive is not on the Urban Systea and in
llr. Friis opinion, will not be added. Mr. Friis stated
that it would have to run for about three miles to be in-
cluded on the system. It would be difficult to
justify a classification other than "Collector" on West
Union Avenue.
• .
• •
•
,
' J
-
MllCT1
•
• C•
•
DEPARTMENT OF C0114MUNrtY.
0Ev£LOPM£NT '
ENGLfwn · '"I ~l'l L O~AOO
""'90IRCI ···=-·-JUN 2 6 1975
D. A. Romans, Asst. Director for DA'llt June nR:,-it~9rl/~Sr----
Planning, Dept. of Conununity Development
!Cells Waggoner
S. ZUNI ST. -MASTER STREET PLAN
With reference to your memo of June 24, 1975, S. Zuni St.
would probably not change insofar as right-of-way width,
roadway width and design thickness, whether it be classed
as an arterial or a collector. Arterials usually receive
precedence at intersections where they cross collectors,
but in the instance of a collector crossing a collector,
the determining factor would be whi c h street carried
more traffic. At the present time, there are collectors,
such as Oxford, on the Federal Ai d-Urban System, and there
has not been any preference shown for arterial streets,
but I could forsee that, if funds were to be in short
supply, then preference would probably be given to those
streets c lassed as arterials.
Insofar as Tejon vs. Zuni as the arterial, to me it would
not make much difference as to designati on if both streets
were limited by Evans on the north and Dartmouth on the
s outh, but in that Zuni is projected to go on through to
U.S. 285, it makes much more sense to have Zuni Street as
the arterial. It might also be noted that Zuni Street is
next 1/2 mi le street which lies east of Federal.
Sincere ly,
!~.~-
Dir ector of Public Wo r ks
KW/ls
the
•
'
• •
\ ..
l ,
I
•
•
0 -I •
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUN!.,.,
DEVELOPMENT
E9JG LE~OD . r.OLORADO
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER JUN 25 1975
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
Mr. Arthur Martin, Jr.
ChaiI'll&n Englewood.City Planning
and Zoning Commission
Department of COlmlllnity DeveloP!lent
3400 South Elati Street
Englewood, Colorado
OFFICE OP DIRECIOR
ROOM 300
1«5 CLEVELAND PLACE
DENVER, COLORADO 80202
June 24, 1975
Dear Kr. Martin:
Recently, I have received your preaa release announcing possible -...IMDta
to the Englewood Master Street Plan.
Accordingly, I .. aubllitting for your information the following planned
street segments as indicated on the current City and County of Denver Coa-prehensive Plan.
1. lbe following street does not conflict with your possible amendllent:
Lovell Boulevard -Collector street froa Quincy Avenue to Chenargo Av nue.
2. 1b following streets vary in claaaification from your possible •endlMnta:
3 .
?ala Avenu -Arterial atre t froa South Broadway to So uth Santa Fa
Driv and an arterial atr et froa th So uth Platte River to the C&S lt.dlroad.
Zuni Stre t -Local atr et froa !vana Avenue to Dart:11outh Av ue.
Platt iv r Driv -1b
iv ia a coll ctor atr t ban o t Platte
to Dar uth Av
iatant on our
atr ta lt. ad in th ral a er no
t Ci '1 County of D v r. thin th • •
-
,.
•••
Mr. Arthur Hartin, Jr.
Page Two
June 24, 197!;
•
• I•
•
I trust this information will be useful in the amendment process.
Please contact ae if you desire further detail or discussion.
~~L~
Alan L. Canter
Director of Plannina
ALC/U/lf
• •
I
-
•
·,
• •
INlll4ll1ICI
FWIOUlleUM
t•
UtVELOPMENT
ENGLEWOOO, COLORADO
JUN 2 7 19 75
TOs Jim Supinger, Director of Colllll'. Dev. DAiii June 24, 1975
PllOlli Chief Hamilton, Fire Department
THROUGH ACCESS NORTH ON ELATI STREET AT FLOYD AVENUE
-.a.
•
I am fully aware of and have reviewed the case history, dating back
to 1967, which resulted in the termination of north bound traffic
on Elati Street at Floyd Avenue. It is not my intention to challenge
the validity of the termination for traffic in general: however, I
should like to paint out that when the initial street plan was formu-
lated, related to Cinderella City -including the north bound barrier
on Elati at Floyd, our No. l fire station was located at Floyd and
Bannock. Since then, however, the No. l fire station has been re-
located to Jefferson and South Elati.
Since !nati Street is the most expedient response route on which to
respond emergency equipment into the north district, I feel there is
an urgent need to remove the island at Floyd to allow expedient and
direct response of fire and rescue equipment from the No. l fire
station into the north district, lying directly west of Broadway and
east of the Santa Fe tracks.
Only two (2) alternate routes are open to us on which to respond into
this district and as indicated on a map provided, they are as follows:
1. If Cherokee is used it is necessary to make four (4) right-
angle intersectional turns, manipulate twelve (12) block•
and four (4) signalized intersections to reach a designated
point of General Iron Works.
2. To use Broadway, it is necessary for equipment to manipulate
six (6) right-angle intersectional turns, travel nineteen (19)
blocks and through nine (9( signalized intersections.
If w were allowed through emergency ace ss on Elati Street, it
would be n cessary to manipulate only on Cl) right-anqle inter-
• ctional turn, travel eight (8) blocks and pass through two (2)
signalized intersections.
WAH / I
enc. p)
cc: Ci y Planning and Zoning C011Ri11ion
11• a99on r, Dir Pub ic orka Andy Cown, Ci y
•
• •
-
\ ~
. ..
•
•
u.s.1tS'
"'· ~-;(, 'f ftt\"*'
~· ... vJ .1, ~,, ....
•
0
•
~
t•
;.
, .
• .
...
. . .
•
I
•
-
' J
•
•
TO:
FROM:
QUE:
SIAJECT :
•
• •
--1".. • !Jfr F-JO.
MH()RANVLJM . '.
la.mu. L. Suplttgett
llVLecto JL 06 Corrrnun.Uy Ve.ve.lopmen,t
Robe.Jtt L. Mo}[gan
Acting Chle.6 06 PoUce.
June. 'l.7, 1975
TRAFFIC ISLAND AT ELATI ANV FLOYV
I~
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNrr.t
DEVELOPMENT
ENGLEWOOD, COLOR ADO
JLlN 2 7 1975
It ha.6 be.en .the. con.tvLUon o 6 .tht. poUce. de.paJLtme.n.t 6M. .the. pa4t u\ICJUll
IJe.all.6 .that .the. tl!.466.i.c. .i6tan.d a.t Flotjd 1111 d Ela.ti 4lwuld be. ltUIOve.d lllld
.the. .iltte.M t.etlon 6.i.gnali.ze.d.
An .i.n-dLptlt 4t.J.uilj o 6 .th.i.6 plVl.t.i.c.u.lAJt plWblut Wa.6 done. blJ Sgt. 'Jla.ll.4c.e. ( l'tOMI ~d i who Wll4 .in cluvi.ge. 06 .the. poUc.e. de.paJLtme..11,t' 4 tlt4 6.i.c. di.v.i6.i.D1t.
Tli.f. Ullloval 06 .the. .i6lan.d Wa.6 Jte.COllfllUlde.d blj Ch.i..e.6 Cltubtj OK M4q 2, 797f,
at a lllf.e.t.i.ng 06 .tht Ci.tJj Plan.n.i.ng tllld Zoning COlllM.66.i.D • Ch.i..t.6 Cl.44b1J at
that tiM. 4ta.te.d .the. .i6lalld 4hou.l.d be. Jtt.move.d .i.n oll.dtA to 6acilita.te. ..avt.-
lllt.At 06 .tJtaU.i.c. 1111d to eliminate. .the. divtgeAOUli 6.i..t.ua.t(.on which W46 oc.c.u.u.Utg
whu 1110to-'t.Ua tWlll !Light .into .the. onc.omlng tJta 6.i.c. .i.n 1111 ~ to gtt
Cll!Dwtd .the. .i6tand.
rt .i6 lfllJ 6e.e.Ung that .th.i6 p.11.Dblvn 4UU.. e.wa 1111d .tJtaU.i.c. ~ would be.
llLch 4lfl0othvt .i.6 .the. .i6 lalld we.Jtt. 11.t.movtd.
Tlte. ~ lw obuAVe.d a g~ ~vt.d o' tMU.lc. at t#uut
t.i.llU .tht .i.nttJl.6tc.Uon .i6 l>igrA.l(.ud (du.lt.Uig .th Clvti..6 4e.440K, ttc.)
lllld would -'t.C.OlllllV!d th.i..6 ac.t.i.D bt .taktn.
~.;?"J ?I~~
Rob~ L. Mo 1111
Ac.t.i.ng Ch.i 6 p li.c.e.
tlLU /tt
·-~
• . .
'
• •
,
•
•
•
•
-
·Proposed Amendment of
Ma·ster Street Plan
•
•
0 I • -
3 D
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN MANN
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINA NCE NO. , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE I AND II, (CHAP TER 8)
TITLE III, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED
"MOVING" AND "WRECKING" AND REENACTING THE SAME WITH
AMENDMENTS.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAI ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
That Sections 1 through 17, inclusive, Article I,
Chapter 8, Title Ill of the 1969 Englewood Municipal Code
en t itled "Moving", are hereby repealed and reenacted to
read as fol lows:
3-8-1 DEFINITIO S
As used in this Chap er, the followi ng words
and phrases shall be deemed to mean the following:
(a) "Structur Mover• any person, firm or corpor-
a ion nga ed in the movement or transportation
of hou e , bu1ldin , tructur , or any por -
tion hereof, wi hin or throu h the City of
n lewood.
( ) "S rue ur " any hous , ui ldin , edi fie , or
pro ion her of.
(c)
(d) , OT Oth T •
• 1 •
•.
• •
-
' J
3-8-2
•
•
•
• t•
•
MOVER S LICENSE -APPLICATION -REQUIREMENTS
(a) No "structural move r" as defined herein
shall make application for a moving permit
without first having applied for and
received a "Movers Licens e" from the City
License Officer. (S ec. 9-1-1)
(b) Said Movers License Fee shall be $50.00
annually which sum shall accompany the
applic ation for said license.
(c) Prior to issuance of any license, the
applican shall provide proof of insur -
ance by submitting a certificate of
insurance to the Director of Finance
indicating ha the following minimum
insurance coverages are in effect:
(d)
( )
PUBLIC LI BILITY and
PROPERTY DAMAGE
D a h or in1ury to any one person
Total li bility in any accident
Proper y damage
/<1>"·"~-$ .W,80i)
300,000
50,000
OU Of
rai
ion .
nly rue ure ro its
~
• .
'
• •
,
-
' ~
3-8-4
•
•
•
0 I•
•
(b) Move any structure to a site within the
city.
(c) Move any structure along or across any
public street of the city.
Exceptions: A Moving Permit shall not be
required for construction shacks as detenained
by the Chief Building Official or for structures
having a maximum flo or area of 100 sq. ft.
for which a Building Permit is not required.
PERMIT -APPLICATION
(a) Application for a Movers Permit shall be
furn ished by the Code Enforc ement Div-
ision of thP Depa rtment o f Community
Deve lopment and shall contain the following
informa ion;
1. . ame, ddress and t elephone number of th applicant.
2. Add re of present location of structure.
3. Add re of propo d loca tion to which th true UT l to b oved.
4. Oat of prop ed •ove•ent of
s. 0 d in •ovement ure.
6. of th truck and
ed to be used
s ruc ture.
7 • t bondina nd
v b en •
(b)
d
-3 -
~
• .
• •
-
' ..
•
•
•
•
• I •
•
by the City Planning and Zoning Comm-
ission. All said structures shall
comply wi th all provisions of the Uniform
Building Code for new structures and all
required permits therefor shall be obtained
prior to any work being performed. No
structure shall be moved to a site within
the City until the necessary foundation
therefor has been completed, inspected
and approved.
(c) If the structure is proposed to be moved
from a site in Englewood, or through
Englewood, to a site in an adjoining
jurisdiction, written proof shall be pre-
sented that the adjoining jurisdiction
exercising co ntrol over the site to
which the structure is being moved has
granted perm ission to place the structure
on th e proposed site and that all adjoining
jurisdictions hrough which the move will
tak place have is ued permits therefor.
(d ) If h true ure i proposed to be located
on a ite within th e City of Englewood,
the follo wing additional procedures shall
appl y:
Th e followin infor a t ion hall be sub -
•i ed ith th applica ion (20 copies of
e ch document):
1.
2.
·• .
and
ntina
(s)
•.
'
• •
-•
0 I•
•
as they are proposed to appear after
the structure is moved to the pro-
posed site and all necessary con-
struction is comple ted.
3. A floor plan sketch, drawn to scale
and with appropriate dimensions,
showing the structure(s) as proposed
to be completed on the proposed site.
4. A statement describing the size,
spacing and span of floor joists, the
size and spacing of studs, the ceiling
height s of rooms, size and spacing
of roo f rafters, type of roof and
covering, type of heating plant and
plumbing and type of co nstruction
(frame, brick, etc.).
5. A statement describing proposed
addition , repairs, and remodeling.
(e) After receipt of all of the requied i nfor -
m tion, po ing of the proposed site and
adverti ement in the official newspaper,
the City Planning and Zoning Co11111ission
shall hold a public hearing on the
applies ion.
(f) Th Ci y Pl nning nd Zo ning Co .. is ion
ma di pprov the application if the pro -
posed tructur i out of character wit~
th ru ( ) in the block or facin1
bloc of he proposed i te by r ason of
tyle, h 1 itin charac eristics.
approve an application
ur d th t th propo ed
be d tri• n al o
• traf c
ht nd
ri of the
•
·S·
•.
• •
-
l
3-8-6
3 -8 -7
•
0
•
REQUIRED INSPECTIO
Inspection of the structures proposed to be
moved shall be made by both the Code Enforce-
ment and Traffic Engineering Divisions prior
to issuance of a permit.
PERMIT -FEE -EXPIRATION
A moving permit fee for structure to be moved
to a site within the City of Englewood shall
be $50.00 and for structures to be moved
through or out of the City shall be $25.00.
All said moving permits shall expire sixty
(60) days after date of issuance.
PERFORMANCE BONDS --STRUCTURE MOVER OR OWNER
(a) STRUCTURE MOVER
•
'
• •
-' .,
•
0
•
(b) OWNER
A Performance and Completion Bond,
or other insurance bond, acceptable
to the Chief Building Officia l, and
proof thereon in writing by the in-
suring company, shall be posted by
the owner of the site to which the
structure is moved prior to issuance
of a permit for necessary construction.
The bond, of at least $5,000, shall
insure the necessary construction, in-
cluding: s tructural, electrical,
plumbing and heating construction
required to bring the moved structure
into compliance with the current
Build ing Code. Said bond shall be
increased above the minimum $5,000
if the Chief Building Official deter-
mines th t the anticipated costs of
the necessary construction as above
set out will exceed $5,000. In such
case, a bond at lease equal to the
amount of the anticipated costs shall
be required.
CASH DEPOSIT
A cash d po i , in he amount of one hundred
doll r ($10 0), h 11 b po ted by the Structure
over with th Chief uildin Off cial prior
to 1 ny Movin& Persit. Said deposit
d t o r p a ir d • e to public prop rty
ha th ructure lover do not
w1th1n thirty (30) day
· th Chief Buildina Official.
• 7.
. ,
• •
,
-' .,
3-8-9
l-8-10
•
•
• I•
•
USE OF STATE HIGHWAY -PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIRED
No Moving Pe rmit, proposing to utilize a State
Highway as part of the route, shall be issued
until approval, in writing, therefore has been
granted by th e State Highway Department.
PREPARATI ON FOR MOVING STRUCTURE
(a) In preparation for moving a structure, the
appl icant shall, or shall cause:
(b)
1. The openings in the vacated structure
protected with suitable coverings to
prevent unauthorized entry or van-
dalism.
2. The po wer to all service lines shut
off and all such lines disconnected
outside of the property lines.
3. The disconnection and capping of all
gas, water, steam, sewer and other
service line outside of the building
line , curb li ne or at the main trans -
miss ion lin e as directed by the company
providin the se rvi ce.
4.
s. of utility
and bills for
• •
-' .,
t
3-8-11
3-8-12
3-8-13
• · l
•
0 ,.
•
\
\
SITE MA:NTENANCE
The stn1cture mover shall clean or cause the
cleaning of the si te from which the structure
was ta ken by removing all debris, material
or equipment. Further , said mover shall fill
all holes and irregulari tie s of the site
within forty-eight (48) hours after removal
of the structure to the satisfaction of the
Chief Building Official.
TRAFFIC HAZARD CREATED; ESCO RT; EXPENSE
If, in the judgemen of the Traffic Engineering
Division, the moving of a s tructure may create
a traffic hazard, a police escort, or other
escort, may be required to be provided by the
Structure Mover, for th purpose of regulating
traffic along he route of the move. Where
such e cort is required, the expense shall be
borne by the Struc ure Mover. The escort shall
not have the uthroity to waive or vary ny of
the requirem n of the permit or applicable
section of th Code.
OTICE
det-
ion,
po ted,
Par in1
hour
• •
' ,
3-8-15
3-8-16
3-8-17
3--1
•
•
Permit shall become null and void unless the
move is completed within the spe c ified time
approved on the permit; provided, however, that
the Chief Building Official may extend the time
period of the move after consulting with the
Traffic Division, the Police Depa rtment and
the Fire Department. Such extensions shall
be permitted only when the moving at the original
time is rendered impractical by reason of
inclement weather, strikes, or other causes
beyond the control of the Structure Mover.
FLASHING LIGHTS ON STRUCTURE
A flashing red light shall be required at each
main corner of the structu re being moved and
at the end of any projection thereon when the
structure is located wi hin a public right-of -
way .
OTICE TO UTILITY COMPANIES
The S ructur fover sh 11 notify all utility
companies maintaining poles, lines or equip-
ment within the public righ -of -way of the
pproved rou a least thr e days prior to
he propo d move .
STRIPPI G; SAL\'AGJ G; SALES -PROHIBITED
Stripping,
ma erial i
which h
h
o! part or
· l .
..
• •
' ,
Section 2.
•
0 t•
•
necessary to obtain a judicial abatement thereon.
In addition, the violation by any person, firm
or corporation of any provision of this Article
may be prosecuted as other violators of Municipal
ordinances, and shall subject the violator those
fines and penalities as are provided in Cahpter 2
Title I of this Code.
That Article II (Wrecking) Section 21, Chapter 8,
Title III of the '69 E.M.C. is hereby repealed and said
Article is renumbered and reenacted to read as follows:
3-8-26
II. DEMOLITION OF STRUCTURES
DEMOLITION LICENSE REQUIRED; FEE; INSURANCE
(a) No person, firm or corporation shall make
application for a demolition permit without
first having applied for and received a
demolition license from the City License
Officer. (See Section 9-1-1)
(b) Said annual demolition license fee shall be
$50.00 which sum shall accompany the applica-
tion for said license.
No license fee shall be required of a private
home owner doin such work on his own pre•ises.
(c) Any uch person, firn or corporation havin
received de olit1on license and applyina
for a pet111i o deaoli h any tructure shall
covered y public lia ili y and property
da a in urance a lea t in the follow na
•inimu aoun
• 1 1 •
any on person
ny on acciden
over
h r
ht•
or
s •
300,000
S0,000
o(
or ,
u •
hall
• •
' '
3-8 -2 7
3 --2
•
•
•
0
•
hold the City harmless from any liability
arising out of the work authorized by the
permit.
DEMOLITION PERMIT; REQUIREME TS
(a) No strucutre within the City of Englewood
shall be demolished unless and until a perait
therefor has been issued by the Code Enforcement
Division of the Department of Community Devel -
opment.
(b) A separate demolition permit shall be required
for each structure to be demolished. The
permit shall be kept on the premises during
the demolition, and shown, on demand, to any
authorized agent of the Ci ty of Englewood.
(c) The permit fee shall be $50.00 and shall expire
ixty (60 ) days after the date of is uance.
(d )
o permit or fe shall be required of a private
homeown e r do i ng suc h wo rk on his own premises.
1. nd l ph n n 1' 0 t
· l .
'
• •
' '
3-8-29
3 · -30
•
•
•
0 -
2. Address of the proposed demolition.
3. Starting date and proposed time period
during which the demolition would occur.
4. Description of the proposed method of
demolition and proposed methods of public
protection (such as dust control, security,
etc.)
MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
(a) The power to all service lines shut off and all
such lines disconnected outside of the property
lines.
(b) The disconnection and capping of all gas,
water, steam, sewer and other service lines
outside of the ~ui~ding line, curb line or at
the main ransm1ss1on line as directed by the
company providing the service.
(c) Notification, in dv nee, of all utility com-
panies providin service to the si te and their
approval ob ained prior to the disconnection.
(d) Pa , or caus t o hav paid, all costs of utility
disconn ctions c pp ing and bills for service.
(e) Special r ffic, parking and pedestrian pro-
may b r quired by the Chief Building
( f )
1 nd hal l provided at th applicant's
p rt
oh
·l .
rials on the prem i
prohi i d.
of
d
'
• •
•
• •
'·
may be prosecuted as other violations of Municipal
Ordinances and shall subject the violator to those
fines and penalties as are provided for in Chapter
2 of Title I of this Code.
Section 3.
The prov1s1ons of this Article are hereby declared
to be severable , and if any section, provision, or part
thereof shall be held unconstitutional or invalid, for any
reason, the remainder of this Ordinance shall continue in
full force and affect, it being the legislative intent
that these Articles would have been adopted even if such
unconstitutional or i nval id matter have not been included
therein .
It is further declared that if any provision s
or part hereof, or the application thereof, to any person
or circwastance are held i nvalid, the remainder of said
Arti cles in the application thereof to other persons shall
not be affected thereby .
I ntrodu ce d, read in full and passed on first
r adin on the 7th day of July, 1975.
Publ is hed as a Bill for an Ordinance on the
10th day of July, 19 75.
h
S ri
Re d by title and pas ed on final readina on
4th day of Auau t, 19 5.
Publish d by ti 1 a Ordinanc
of 1975, on he 7th day of
o.
19 s.
T:
' .
• •
......
' ' .
(
0
•
I, Wi lliam D. James, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of the Ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1975.
ex officio City Clerk -Treasurer
·15 ·
• .
•
'
• •
-
\ .,
(
•
0
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN MANN
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE I A D II, (CHAPTER 8)
TITLE III, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED
"MOVING" AND "WRECKING" AND REENACTING THE SAME WITH
AMENDMENTS.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as foll ows:
Section 1.
That Sections 1 through 17, inclusive, Article I,
Chapter 8, Title III of the 1969 Englewood Municipal Code
entitled "Moving", re herehy repealed and reenacted to
read as follows :
3-8-1 DEFINITIO S
and
(a)
in this Ch p er, the following words
11 be deem d to mean the following:
on, firm or corpor-
ove ent or tran portation
rue ur , or an por -
or throu h th Ci y of
(b) "5 ructur " ny hou
protion her of.
uild1n , d1f1c , or
(c)
(d)
. l .
, burn1n , or other·
ur .
'
• •
\. )
(
3-8-2
•
•
•
0
•
<.
MOVERS LICENSE -APPLICATION -REQUIREMENTS
(a) o "structural mover" as defined herein
shall make applicati on for a moving pennit
without first having applied for and
received a "Movers License" from the City
License Officer. (S ec. 9-1-1)
(b ) Said Mover s License Fee s ha ll be $5 0.00
annually wh ich s um shall accompa ny the
application fo r said licens e.
(c) Prior to i suance of any license , the
applicant shall provide proof of insur -
an ce by submittin g a ce rtificate of
i n surance to the Director of Finance
i ndic ating tha t the following minimum
insuranc coverage are i n effect:
PUBLIC LI BILITY and
PROPERTY DAMAGE
D h or injury to any one per son
Total li bility in any acci dent
Prop r y d ma e
$ 50,000
300,000
50,000
(d)
REQU IRED
nt :
( ) onl ru e tu re roa it
. ...
• •
' .,
(
3-8-4
•
•
•
0
·. •
(b) Mo e n/ true ure to a si te within the
cit .
(c) Mo n\ rue ure along or across any
public ·tr e of the city.
Exception : A Mo ing Permit shall not be
requ ir d for construction shacks as deterained
by the Chief Building Offi cial or for structures
having a maximum floo r area of 100 sq. ft .
for which a Building Permit is not required.
PERMI T -APPLICATION
(a) Application for a Movers Permit shall be
furnished by the Code Enfo rcement Div-
ision of thP Department of Community
Development and shall con ta in the following
information;
(b)
1. ame, address and telephone number
of the applicant.
Z. Address of present location of
structur
3. Addre of propo d loc t ion to which
4.
s.
6 .
7.
h rue ure is o be oved.
time of propo ed aovea nt
ur
o e u ed ln ao aent
and
d
nd
'
• •
-
' '
-
•
•
•
• t•
•
by the City Planning and Zon ing Comm-
ission. All said structures sha ll
comply with all provisions of t he Un iform
Building Code for new structur es and all
required permits therefor shall b e obtaine d
prior to any work being performed. No
structure shall be moved to a site wi thin
the City until the necessary fo un da t i on
therefor has been completed, i n spec ted
and approved.
(c) If the structure is proposed to b e moved
from a site in Englewood , or through
Englewood, to a site in an a djoinin g
jurisdiction, written ~roof shall be p r e -
sented that the adjoining j urisdic t i on
exercising control over the si t e t o
which the structure is being moved h as
granted permission to place the st ruc ture
on the proposed site and that all adjoining
jurisdictions through which the move will
take place have issued permits therefor .
(d) If the structure is proposed to be locat ed
on a site within the City of Englewood,
the following additional procedures shall
apply:
The following information shall be sub-
mi tt d with th applic tion (20 copies of
ch docu ent):
1.
2.
-·-
seal with
ivin the
aeasure•ents of
or
sit
cal nd
, npr s ntina
true ur (s)
'
• •
.......
' \
0
'
•
0 M
•
as they are proposed to appear after
the structure is moved to the pro-
posed site and all necessary con-
struction is completed.
3. A floor plan sketch, drawn to scale
and with appropriate dimensions,
showing the structure(s) as proposed
to be completed on the proposed site.
4. A statement describing the size,
spacing and span of floo r joists, the
size and spacing of studs, the ceiling
heights of rooms, size and spacing
of roof rafters, type of roof and
covering, type of heating plant and
plumbing and type of construction
(frame, brick , etc.).
5. A statement describing proposed
addition , repairs, and remodeling.
(e) After receipt of all of the requied infor-
mation, po ing of the proposed site and
adverti ement in the official newspaper,
the City Planning and Zoning Co .. ission
shall hold public he ring on the
applic tion.
(f) The C1 y Planning and Zonin& Co .. i sion
may di approve the application if the pro-
po ed tru ture i out of character wit~
h tru tur ( ) in h block or facina
bloc of th propo ed ite by re on of
tyl , h i h or itin characteri tics.
·S·
n application
propo ed
• .
'
• •
,
-
' \
3-8-6
3-8-7
•
0 , .
•
REQUIRED INSPECTIO
Inspection of the structures proposed to be
moved shall be made by both the Code Enforce-
ment and Traffic Engineering Divisions prior
to issuance of a permit.
PERMIT -FEE -EXPIRATION
A moving permit fee for structure to be moved
to a site within the City of Englewood shall
be $50.00 and for structures to be moved
through or out of the City shall be $25.00.
All said moving permits shall expire sixty
(60) days af er da t e of issuance.
PERFORMANCE BONDS --STRUCTU RE MOVER OR OWNER
(a) STRUCTURE MOVER
A Performance and Completion Bond, or
other insurance bond, acceptable to
the Chief Building Official, and proof
thereon in writ i ng by the insuring
company, hall be posted by the Structure
Mover prior to i suance of the Moving
Permit. The bond, of at least $5,000,
shall insure the necessary cost of
rai in th truc ture fro the existin&
foundation, aovina the structure to the
new i t e, pl cin th structure on the
new ound t1on, as w 11 a the cost of
cl aning, illin and levelin& the site
from hich h ructu re wa aoved in the
City of n 1 wood, ithin 48 hours of the
r oval. ~a1 bond hall be increa ed
abo e th in1• • SS,000 if th Chief
Buildina Offi c ial d ter• ne s th• th
ntic1 d a
w 11 d In
bond the
nt
<
• •
I
-
' \
f"'
3 -8 -8
•
• (•
•
(b) OWNER
A Per formance and Completion Bond,
or other ins urance bond, acceptable
to the Chief Building Official, and
proo f thereon in writing by the in-
suring company, sh all be posted by
the owner of the site to which the
structure is moved prior to issuance
of a permit for ne cess ary construction.
The bond, of at least $5,000, shall
insure the nece ss ary construction, in -
cluding: s truc tural, electrical,
plumbing and heating construction
r equired to bring the moved structure
into compliance with the c urrent
Building Code. Said bond shall be
increased above the minimum $5,000
if the Chief Building Official deter -
mines that the anticipated costs of
the nec essary construction as above
set out will exceed $5,000. In such
case, a bond at lease equal to the
amount of the anticipated costs shall
be required.
CASH DEPOSIT
·7·
in the mount of one hundred
11 be po ed by the Structure
f Buildina Official prior
o 1n P rait. Said deposit
ir d a e to public proper t y
h true ur over does not
1th1n thirty (30) day
y h Chief Buildina Official.
•
• •
I
-
' \
' 3-8-9
3-8-10
•
• t•
•
USE OF STATE HIGHWAY -PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIRED
No Moving Permit, proposing to utilize a State
Highway as part of the route, shall be issued
until approval, in writing, therefore has been
granted by the State Highway Department.
PREPARATION FOR MOVING STRUCTURE
(a) In preparation for moving a structure, the
applicant shall, or shall cause:
1. The openings in the vacated structure
protected with suitable coverings to
prevent unauthorized entry or van-
dalism.
Z. The power to all service lines shut
off and all such lines disconnected
outside of the property lines.
3. The disconnection and capping of all
gas, water, steam, sewer and other
service lines outside of the building
line, curb line or at the main trans -
mission line as directed by the company
providing the service.
4. The notification, in advance, of all
utility companies providing service
to he ite and their approval obtained
prior to the disconnection.
S. Th p nt of all costs of utility
di connections, capping , and bills for
ervice.
(b) o stru cture hall be raised from its
founda ion in preparation for moving until
within for y -e ght ( 8) hours of th approv d
i Th Chief Buildi n Official aay,
upon how o c u by he tru ure ov r,
i su n pprov 1 for an xtens on
of th i
7
.
'
• •
-
' '
3-8-11
3-8-12
3-8 -13
3 -• 14
•
0 t•
•
SITE MA JNTENANCE
The stn~ture mover shall clean or cause the
cleaning of the site from which the structure
was taken by removing all debris, material
or equipment. Further , said mover shall fill
all holes and irregulari ties of the site
within fo rty -eight (48) hours after removal
of the st ructur e to the satisfaction of the
Chief Building Official.
TRAFFIC HAZARD CREATED; ESCORT; EXPENSE
If, in the judgement of the Traffic Engineering
Division, the moving of a structure may create
a traffic hazard, a police escort, or other
escort, ma y be required to be provided by the
Structure Mover, for the purpose of regulating
traffic along the route of the move. Where
such escort is required , the ex pense shall be
borne by the Structure Mo ver. The escort shall
not have the authroity o waive or vary any of
the requirements of the permit or applicable
section of the Code.
ADVAN CE POSTING ; NOTICE
When the movement of a tructure alone an
approved rout would b impeded by vehicles
p r ed within the public ri ht-of-way as det ·
ermined by the Traffic En ineerin& Division,
th S ructure Mover shall cause to have posted,
by the Traffic En ineerin Division, o Parkin&
i n along 5uch r1 ht -of-way at lea t 4 hours
prior to th ruc ure mo e. The Traffic
En in ering Division is h r by authoriied t o
move, or c u o b moved, ny vehicle parked
in viol tion of uch ign . Fee for postin&
s id " o P r ina" si n hall be establi h d
by he Tr ff1c Enain er n D1 i ion.
TIM . 0
·9 ·
ion, h
nt. Th
7
'
d
• •
,
' \
•
3-8-15
3-8-16
3-8-17
3-8 -1
•
0
•
Permit shall become null and void unless the
move is completed within the specified time
approved on the permit; provided, however, that
the Chief Building Official may extend the time
period of the move after consulting with the
Traffic Division, the Police Department and
the Fire Department. Such extensions shall
be permitted only when the moving at the original
time is rendered impractical by reason of
inclement weather, strikes, or other causes
beyond the control of the Structure Mover .
FLASHING LIGHTS ON STRUCTURE
A flashing red light shall be required at each
main corner of the structure being moved and
at the end of any projection thereon when the
structure is located within a public right-of -
way.
NOTICE TO UTILITY COMPANIES
The Structure Mover shall notify all utility
companies maintaining poles, lines or equip-
ment within the public right-of-way of the
approved route at least three days prior to
the proposed move.
STRIPPI Gj SALVAGING; SALES -PROHIBITED
Strippin , alv gin and/or sales of parts or
m erial i prohibited on the premises from
wh ich he s ructure i to be moved or to wh ich
the s ructure 1~ o b oved.
-1 •
'
•
-
' \
•
•
•
•
Section 2.
•
0
•
necessary to obtain a judicial abatement thereon.
In addition, the violation by any person, firm
or corporation of any provision of this Article
may be prosecuted as other violators of Municipal
ordinances, and shall subject the violator those
fines and penal i ties as are provided in Cahpter 2
Title I of this Code.
That Article II (Wrecking) Section 21, Chapter 8,
Title III of the '69 E.M.C. is hereby repealed and said
Article is renumbered and reenacted to read as follows:
3-8-26
II. DEMOLITION OF ST RUCTURES
DEMOLIT ION LICENSE REQUIRED; FEE; INSURANCE
(a) No person, firm or corporation shall make
application for a demo lition permit without
first having applied for and received a
demolition license from the City License
Officer. (See Section 9-1-1)
(b) Said annual demolition license fee shall be
$50.00 which SUlll shall accompany the applica-
tion for said license.
No license fee shall be required of a private
home owner doing such work on his own preaises.
(c) Any such per on, fir or corporation having
received a demolition license and applyina
for a permit o demolish any structure shall
b covered y pu lie liability and property
damage insurance a lea t in the followi ng
ini•u• oun
Death or injury to ny one person
Total liability in any on acciden
Property d ma
$ 50,000
300,000
50,000
Th
th
nd
contractor ,
·ll ·
he liabiU y of
re pect to all or ,
or hi •a nts, ub-
or ap1oyee nd hall
'
• •
f
-
' \
3-8-27
•
3-8 -28
•
•
•
•
•
hold the City harmless from any liability
arising out of the work authorized by the
permit.
DEMOLITION P.ERM~T; REQUIREMENTS
(a) No strucutre within the City of Englewood
shall be demolished unless and until a permit
therefor has been issued by the Code Enforcement
Division of the Department of Community Devel-
opment.
(b) A separate demolition permit shall be required
for each structure to be demolished. The
permit shall be kept on the premises during
the demolition, and shown, on demand, to any
authorized agent of the City of Englewood.
(c) The permit fee shall be $50.00 and shall expire
sixty (60) days after the date of issuance.
No permit or fee shall be required of a private
homeowner doing such work on his own premises.
(d) A Performance and Completion Bond shall be
required by the person, firm or corporation
proposing to complete the demolition prior
to the issuance of any permit. Said bond
shall be i n an amount of at least $5,000 but
may be increased by the Chief Building
Inspector should he deteraine that a greater
amount is necessary to assure coverage of
completion costs. S id bond is to further
assure completion of th propo ed wor ,
including th t work nece sary to clean, fill
nd level the site wi hin 4 hours after the
structure i d oli hed.
APPLICATI O P RMIT
(a)
1.
-1 -
olition perait by tho e
b obtained froa he
ion of the D par aent
n nd hall contain
ion :
lephone nuaber of th
• •
f
' \
3-8-29
•
•
•
•
0
•
Z. Address of the proposed demolition.
3. Starting date and proposed time period
during which the demolition would occur.
4. Description of the proposed method of
demolition and proposed methods of public
protection (such as dust control, security,
etc.)
MISCELLANEOUS REQUIREMENTS
(a) The power to all service lines shut off and all
such lines disconnected outside of the property
lines.
(b) The disconnection and capping of all gas,
water, steam, sewer and other service lines
outside of the building line, curb line or at
the main transmission line as directed by the
company providing the service.
(c) Notification, in advance, of all utility com-
panies providing service to the site and their
approval obtained prior to the disconnection .
(d) Pay, or cause to have paid, all costs of utility
disconnections, capping and bills for service.
(e) Special traffic, parking and pedestrian pro-
visions may be required by the Chief Building
Official and shall be provided at the applicant's
expense.
(f) S le of parts or materials on the premise s of
the demoli ion hall be prohibited.
The demoli ion of ny structure wi hin the City
of Englewood in violation of any provision of thi
Article i s h r by declared o be a public nui anc ,
and upon applic ion of the Director of Co11111unity
D v lop• nt, h City Attorney i hr by au hor i d
nd dir c t d, ithou the nee sity of fur h r
u hor1t th Ci y Council, to in titut uch
1 al pro din ma b n ce sary to obtain a
JUdic1 1 ab t nt th r o . In ddition, th vio-
l ion by r on of any pro i ion of thi Ar cl
-13 -
• •
-
' \
•
Section 3.
•
•
may be prosecuted as other violations of Municipal
Ordinances and shall subject the violator to those
fines and penalties as are provided for in Chapter
2 of Title I of this Code.
The prov1s1ons of this Article are hereby declared
to be severable, and if any section, provision, or part
thereof shall be held unconstitutional or invalid, for any
reason, the remainder of this Ordinance shall continue in
full force and affect, it being the legislative intent
that these Articles would have been adopted even if such
unconstitut ional or invalid matter have not been included
therein.
It is further declared that if any prov1s1ons
or part hereof, or the application thereof, to any person
or circumstances are held invalid, the remainder of said
Articles in the application thereof to other persons shall
not be affected thereby.
In troduced, read in full and passed on first
reading on the 7th day of July, 1975.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the
10th day of July, 1975.
Read by title and pa ssed on final reading on
the 4th d y of August, 1975.
Published by ti 1 as Ordinance No.
Series of 1975, on the 7th day of August, 1975.
MAYOR
x 0
-14 ·
'
• •
' \
•
•
0 t~
•
I, William D. James, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of the Ordinance, passed on final reading and
publ ished by title as Ordinance No. , Series of
1975.
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
·l .
·,;7
• .
~
• •
-
' \
•
•
•
•
0 ,.
. -'
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN MANN
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ARTICLE I AD II, (CHAPTE R 8)
TITLE III, OF THE ENGLEWOOD MUN ICIPAL CODE ENTITLED
"MOVING" AND "WRECKING" AND REE ACTING THE SAME WITH
AME DMENTS.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as foll ows:
Section 1.
That Sections 1 through 17, inclusive, Article I,
Chapter 8, Title III of the 1969 Englewood Municipal Code
entitled "Moving", are hereby repealed and reenacted to
read as follows:
3-8-1 DEFINITIO S
As used in this Ch pter, the following wor ds
and phrases shall be deem d to mean the following:
( ) "Structure
tion en
of hous ,
ion th r
En lewo d.
(b)
(c)
(d} "Demol 1 ion"
i d troy1n
·1 ·
person, firm or corpo r -
ovement or ransportation
tructur , or any por -
or throu h th Cit of
, buildin , edifice, or
urn1n , or other·
~
• .
..
• •
-
\. I
3-8-2
•
•
•
•
0 -
MOV ERS LICENSE -APPLICATION -REQUIREMENTS
(a) No "structural mover" as defined herein
shall make applica tion for a moving perm it
without first having applied for and
received a "Movers License" from the City
Lice n se Officer. (Sec . 9-1-1)
{b) Said Movers License Fee shall be $50.00
annually whi ch sum shall accompany the
appl icat ion fo r said licens e.
(c) Prior to iss uanc e of any license, the
app licant shall provide proo f of i nsur -
an ce by s ubm itting a ce rt ificate of
insurance to the Directo r of Finance
i ndicatin g that the follo wing minimum
insuranc e coverages are in effect:
PUBLIC LIABILITY and
PROPERTY DA 1AGE
Death or injury to any one person
Total liability in any accident
Property damage
$ 50,000
300,000
50,000
(d) The insurance shall cover the l i ability
of he Mover with re pect to all work per -
formed by nd n vehicles used by him
(a )
or his a en s, ubcontractors, servants
or e ploy es, nd shall hold the City
h rmle from ny 11 bility arising out o f
he wor au horized by the per it.
ra1
ion.
·2·
ion holding a valid
rform any of the
h in ecured a
Co de En orcemen Di v ·
of Co municy D velopa nt:
on ly tructur from it
• •
-' \
-
3-8-4
•
•
0 ,,
•
(b) Move any structure to a site within the
city.
(c) Move any structure along or acro ss any
public street of the city.
Exceptions : A Moving Permit shall not be
required for construction shac ks as detenained
by the Chief Building Offici al or for structures
having a maximum floor area of 100 sq. ft.
for which a Building Permit is not required.
PERMI T -APPLICATION
(a) Application for a Movers Permit shall be
furnished by the Code En fo rcement Div-
ision of the Department of Community
Development an d shall con ta i n the following
informat ion ;
1. ame, address and telephone number
of the applicant.
2. Address of present location of
structure.
3. Address of proposed location to which
the s ru cture is to be moved.
4. Date nd time of proposed aoveaent
of struc tures.
5. Propo ed rou e to b used in aoveaent
of s ructur
6.
7. C rtific
i nsur nc
(b) o p ni fo
i hin th city
th r foT' h v b
it of th truck and
propo ed to be used
of the s tructure.
that bondina nd
s hav b n a t.
tructure to a it
until plans
nd pprov d
'
• •
-
' \
-
•
•
0 I•
•
by the City Planning and Zoning Comm-
ission. All said structures shall
comply with all provisions of the Unifonn
Building Code for new structures and all
required permits therefor shall be obtained
prior to any work being performed. No
structure shall be moved to a site within
the City until the necessary foundation
therefor has been comple ted, inspected
and approved.
(c) If the structure is proposed to be moved
from a site in Englewood, or through
Englewood, to a site in an adjoining
jurisdiction, written ~roof shall be pre-
sented that the adjoining jurisdiction
exercising control over the site to
which the structure is being moved has
granted permission to place the structure
on the proposed site and that all adjoining
jurisdictions through which the move will
take place have issued permits therefor.
(d) If the structure is propo ed to be located
on a site within the City of Englewood,
the following additional procedures shall
apply:
Th following infor ation hall be sub·
mitted wi h th applic tion (20 copie of
each docum nt)·
1.
2. nd
nt n
(•)
•.
• •
,
......
' \
.......
•
0
•
as they are proposed to appear after
the structure is moved to the pro-
posed site and all necessary con-
struction is comple ted.
3. A floor plan sketch, drawn to scale
and with appropriate dimensions,
showing the structure(s) as proposed
to be completed on the proposed site.
4. A statement describing the size,
spacing and span of floor joists, the
size and spacing of studs, the ceiling
heights of rooms, size and spacing
of roof rafters, type of roof and
covering, type of heating plant and
plumbing and type of construction
(frame, brick, etc.).
5. A statement de cribing proposed
additions, repairs, and remodeling.
(e) After receipt of all of the requied infor-
mation, pos ing of the proposed site and
advert1 ement in the official newspaper,
the City Planning and Zonin g Co11111ission
shall hold a public hearing on the
application.
(f) The Ci y Pl nn1ng and Zoni ng Co .. i ion
y di . ppro e the pplication if the pro -
pos d tructure is out of character wit~
h tru ur ( ) in the block or facin1
bloc of h propo d ite by reason of
tyl , h i h or si ing characteristics.
·S·
• •
-
' \
' I
3-8-6
l-8-7
•
•
•
0 I•
•
REQUIRED INSPECTIO
Inspection of the structures proposed to be
moved shall be made by both the Code Enforce-
ment and Traffic Engineering Divisions prior
to issuance of a permit.
PERMIT -FEE -EXPIRATION
A moving permit fee for structure to be moved
to a site within the City of Englewood shall
be $50.00 and for structures to be moved
through or out of the Ci ty shall be $25.00.
All said moving permits shall expire sixty
(60) days after date of issuance.
PERFORMA CE BONDS --STRUCTURE MOVER OR OWNER
(a) STRUCTURE MOVER
A Performance and Completion Bond, or
other insurance bond, acceptable to
the Chief Building Official, and proof
thereon in wr iting by the insuring
company, hall be posted by the Structure
Mov r prior o i uance of the Moving
Permit. The bond, of at least $5,000,
shall insur he neces ary cost of
raisin he rue ure from the existing
founda ion, moving the structure to the
new i , placin the structure on the
n w foundation, as well as the cost of
cleanin , illin and leveling the site
from which th struc ure was aoved in the
City of En 1 wood, within 48 hours of the
r moval. Said bond shall be increa ed
above h ini u $5,000 if the Chi f
8 ildin Official d ermin that th
an icip t d abov set ou ,
ill d In such ca e, a
ond o th •oun o th
11 r quired.
• .
'
• •
-
' I
•
•
•
•
(b) OWN ER
A Performance and Co mpletion Bond,
or other insurance bond, acceptable
to the Chief Building Official, and
proof thereon in writing by the in-
sur ing company, shall be posted by
the owner of the site to which the
struc ture is moved prior to issuance
of a permit for necessary construction.
The bond, of at leas t $5,000, shall
insure the necessary construction, in-
cluding: structural , electrical,
plumbing and heati ng construction
requ ired to bring the moved s tructure
into compliance with the current
Build ing Code. Said bond shall be
increased above the minimum $5,000
if the Chief Building Official deter-
mines that the anticipated costs of
the necessary con truction as above
set out will exceed $5,000. In such
c se, a bond at lease equal to the
amount of the anticipated costs shall
be required.
CASH DEPOSIT
A cash deposit, in h
dollar
Mover with th
repair
of wri
-7·
..
• •
-
' I
3-8-9
3-8-10
•
•
0 I •
•
USE OF STAT E HIGH AY -PRIOR APPROV AL REQUIRED
No Movin Pe r i , propo ing to utilize a State
Highway a part of h rou , hall be issued
until appro al, in wr1 ing, th refo re has been
granted y the S a e Hi hway Dep artment.
PREPARATI O
(a) In prepara ion for moving a structure, the
appli cant shall, or shall cause :
(b)
1. The openings i n the vacated structure
protected with suitable coverings to
prevent unautho rized entry or van-dali
2. The pow r to all service lines shut
off and all such lines disconnected
outside of the property lines.
3 . The dis c onnection and capping of all
gas, water, steam , sewer and other
service lines outside of the building
line, c urb line or at the main trans -
mi s ion line as directed by the company
providing the service.
4. The notific tion, i n advance, of all
utility companies providing service
o he ite nd their approval obtained
prior to h <li connection.
S. Th paym n of all costs of utility
di conn ction , cappina , and bills for er ice.
o ru ture hall be rai d fro• its
foundation in prepara ion for aovin until
w thin forty -el ht (48) hour of th pprov d
l Th Ch f Buildin Official aay ,
upon ho by h ru ur ov r,
l u rov 1 for n ens on
0 th
•.
• •
' I
3-8 -11
3-8-12
3 -8 -1 3
. ·l
•
I•
•
SITE MA 1NTENANCE
The stn ,cture mover shall clean or cause the
cleaning of the site from which the structure
was taken by removing all debris, material
or equipment. Further, said mover shall fill
all holes and irregularities of the site
within forty-eight (48) hours after removal
of th e structure to the sa t isfaction of the
Chief Building Official .
TRA FFIC HAZARD CREATED ; ESCORT; EXPENSE
If, in the judgement of the Traffic Engineering
Division, the moving of a tructure may create
a traffic hazard, a police esco rt, or other
escort, ay be r quired o be provided by the
Struc ure over, for he purpose of regulating
traffic alon the route of the move. Where
such escort is required, the expens e s hall be
borne by the Structure Mover. The escort s hall
not have th u hroity to w ive o r vary any of
t he require en of the permit or applicable
section o the Code.
ADVANCE POSTING; OTICE
'
d
• •
-
' I
3-8-15
3-8-16
3-8-17
3-8 -1
•
-
Permit shall become null and void unless the
move is completed within the specified time
approved on the permit; provided, however, that
the Chief Building Official may extend the time
period o f the move after consulting with the
Traffi c Division, the Pol ice Department and
the Fire Department. Such extensions shall
be permitted only when the moving at the original
time is rend ered impractical by reason of
i nclement weather, stri kes, or other causes
beyond the control of the Structure Mover.
FLASHING LIGHTS ON STRUCTU RE
A flashing red light shall be required a t each
main corn r of the structure being moved and
at the end of any projection thereon when the
structure is located within a public right-of-way.
OTICE TO UTILITY COMPA IES
The Structur lover h 11 notify all utility
companies main aining poles, lines or equip-
ment within the public right -of-way of the
approved route at 1 ast three days prior to
the propo d move.
STRIPPING; SALVAGING; SALES · PROHIBITED
Stripp i n ,
terial i
whi c h h tru e ure
he to
·I .
les of parts or
he premi fro
oved or to which
• •
' I
Section 2.
•
0
•
necessary to obtain a judicial abatement thereon.
In addition, the violation by any person, firm
or corporation of any provision of this Article
may be prosecut ed as other violators of Municipal
ordinances, and shall subject the violator those
fines and penal ities as are provided in Cahpter 2
Title I of thi s Code.
That Article II (Wrecking ) Section 21, Chapter 8,
Title III of the '69 E.M.C. is hereby repealed and said
Article is renumbered and reenacted to read as follows:
3-8-26
II. DEMOLITION OF ST RUCTURES
DEMOLITION LICE SE REQUIRED; FEE; INSURANCE
(a) o person, firm or corporation shall make
application for a demolition permit without
fi rst having applied for and received a
demolition licen se from the City License
Officer. (See Section 9-1-1)
(b) Said annual demolition license fee shall be
$50.00 which sum s hall accompany the applica-
tion for aid license.
o license fee s hal l be required of a pr i vate
ho e owner doing such work on his own pre•ises.
(c) Any such person, firm o r corporation havin
received a demolition license and appl yi n
for a penai o demolish ny structure shall
be covered by public liabili ty and prop rty
daa insurance at least in the followin
inimu moun s:
Death or injury o any on person
Total liabili y in any one ccident
Prop rty •a
$ 50,000
300,000
50,000
or
-11-
1 ty of
all wor ,
ent , sub-
nd hall
• •
' \
3-8-27
3-8-2
•
•
•
0
•
hold the City harmless from any liability
arising out of the work authorized by the
permit.
DEMOLITION P.'ERM~T; REQUIREMENTS
(a) No strucutre within the City of Englewood
shall be demolished unless and until a permit
therefor has been issued by the Code Enforcement
Division of the Department of Community Devel-
opment.
(b) A separate demolition permit shall be required
for each structure to be demolished. The
permit shall be kept on the premises during
the demolition, and shown. on demand, to any
authorized agent of the City of Englewood.
(c) The permit fee shall be $50.00 and shall expire
sixty (60) days after the date of issuanc .
No permit or fee shall be required of a private
homeowner doing such work on his own premises.
(d) A Performance and Completi on Bond shall be
required by the person. firm or corporation
proposing o complete the demolition prior
to the issuance of any permit. Said bond
shall be in an amount of at least $5,000 but
may be increa ed by the Chief Building
Inspector s hould he deteraine that a greater
mount is nee ssary to assure coverage of
com ple ion cos t s. S id bond is to furth r
a ure comp l t ion of the proposed work,
incl ud in that work n ce s ary to clean. fill
nd lev el he ite with in 4 hours after th
tructure is demoli h d.
APPLICATIO IT
(a) Application for a demolition p rmit by tho
1 . , addr
ppli c nt.
-12 -
ay b obt in d froa th
ion of th D partaent
n nd hall contain
ion :
nd 1 ph n n uaber o th
•.
• •
.......
' I
3-8-29
3· ·3 0
•
•
•
0
•
2. Address of the proposed demolition.
3. Starting date and proposed time period
during which the demolition would occur.
4. Description of the proposed method of
demolition and proposed methods of public
protection (s uch a dust control, security,
et c.)
MI SCELLA NEO US REQUIREMENTS
(a) The power to all service lines shut off and all
such lines disconnected outside of the property
lines.
(b) The disconnection and capping of all gas,
water , steam, sewer and other s ervice lines
outside of the building line , curb line or at
the main ransmission line as directed by the
company providing the service.
(c) Notif ication, in advance, of all utility com-
panies providing ervice to the si te and their
approval obtained prior to the disconne ction.
(d) Pay, or cause to hav paid, all co ts of utility
disconnections, c ppin nd bills for se rv ice.
(e) Speci l traffic, parkin and pedest r ian pro-
vision may b required by the Chief Building
Official nd hall b provided t th applican '
pen
(f)
l .
r1 l on h pre i es of
b prohi 1t d.
1
• •
-
'-I
-
Section 3.
•
• (•
•
may be prosecuted as other violations of Municipal
Ordinances and shall subject the violator to those
fines and penalties as are provided for in Chapter
2 of Title I of this Code.
The prov1s1ons of this Article are hereby declared
to be severable, and if any section, provision, or part
thereof shall be held unconstitutional or invalid, for any
reason, the remainder of this Ordinance shall continue in
full force and affect, it being the legislative intent
that these Articles would have been adopted even if such
unconstitutional or invalid matter have not been included therein.
It is further declared that if any provisions
or part hereof, or the application thereof, to any person
or circumstances are held invalid, the remainder of said
Articles in the application thereof to other persons shall
not be affected thereby.
Int roduced , read in full and passed on first
reading on the 7th day of July, 1975.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 10th day of July, 1975.
Re d by title and passed on final readin on
the 4th day of August, 1975.
Published by titl as Ordinance No.
S ries of 1975, on the 7th day of August, 1975.
MAYOR
Al T:
urer
-1•-
'
• •
-
'-I
\
•
•
•
0 t•
•
I, William D. James, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of the Ordinance, passed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of
1975.
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
·lS ·
•.
'
• •
-
'-I
-
•
•
•
•
0
•
CITY OF E GLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONI G COMMI SSION
J NE 17. 1975
I. CALL TO ORD ER.
The re gular meeting of th Cl. ty Planning and Zon i ng Comm ission
was called to order at 8:00 p.m by Ch airman lartin.
Member s pre nt: Park r, Pierson mit.h, Wad , Jon , Jorgenson,
lar tin
Sup1nger , E -oi11c10
Memb rs abs •nt: Tanguma, Bro\\n
Also pr ent· As istan D1rr tor Roman , As 1sta nt Ci y
Attorn y Lee, ~ oe1nt Plann r Ho u se.
II. APPROVA L QI \I ThS .
Mr. Martin lated that 'inut1~ ot Jun1 3, 1975, \\ r to be
on ider d for approval .
Parke r mov d·
Pi r on s ond d : fhe inut• of Jun 3, 1975,
a!-' \ritte •
r. Bro n nl• rrd nd took h1 lh t
approv d
ion .
A YES: Pl r on,
Park •1·
lth, a ro , Jon s, Jorg nson, arti.n,
Th ti.on l'J'l J.
111.
on o n d.
J
'
• •
-
'-I
(1
•
•
I•
•
eri dan
Englewood Planning Co11111ission
3400 Sout h Elati Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Gentlemen,
June 17, 1975
With reference to enrollme nts ln Sheridan School District o.2,
I wish to give the allowing figur s taken from the compiled attendance
reports on fil e in the Administra ion Office.
Year
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
Fall, 1974
March 21, 1974
To al Enrollme nt
224 .1
2176.2
2043.9
2015
1 37
The abov figures show ad cline 1 enroll nt over h past
f years . Th pres n School 1nanc Ac conta1 s an Aut or1zed
Reven Base figur for each studen nrolled. h Sh rid n Sc ool
Dis rict uld ben i financially i th nroll nts incr ased.
Th Sc ool District can acco da additional s ud
ac 1 i 1 e .
.. . .. ,, .
• •
'-I
•
•
•
0 -
4 A4
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING A D ZO 1 G C \ IISSION
J NE 17, 197 5
I. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of th• City Planning and Zoning Collllt:ission
was called to order at 8:00 p.m . by Chairman ~artin.
Memb ers pre ent; Park r, P1 rson, Smith, Wad , Jon s, Jorgenson,
Martin
Supinger, Ex-0111c10
Member s absent: Tanguma, Rro"'n
Also pr .nt: AbsL tan I>irP tor Romans, Assista nt itv
Attorn y Le<:, '\ oc1at Plann r House.
II . APPROVAL Of \II ITITES .
Ir.
on ,lated that ~inut s 01 Jun 3, 1 i,, <'I" to be or ppro a I
Par r mov·d:
Pi r.on cond d: of .Jun1 3, l 75, approv d
Ir. Bro n n r 11 nd ook hi >I ion.
AYE
AY
:I th, •, lrov.n, .J> Jor n on, artin,
AB r :
Th I.
Ill.
n o n d.
J I JO ar n, P r r,
• •
-
'-I
•
•
• -
-2-
and Carl Wiebe requests an R-2-B, Two-family Residence District,
Legal notification of the Public Hearing was published in the Englewood He rald on May 29, 1975 .
Mrs , Romans submitted seven post i ng certifications to be placed in the f ile .
Mrs. Romans then called attention to a letter from the
Sheridan School District stating that additional students
could be accommodated in that District; the letter further
sets forth the declining school population, and reads as follows :
•.
t -
• •
-
'-I
Englewood Pla nn ing CoJT111ission
340 0 So uth Elati Street
Englewo od , Colo ra do 80110
Gentleme n,
•
-
eri dan
J un e 17 , 1975
Wit h re f ere nce to enrollments 1n Sheridan Sch oo l Di strict No.2,
wish to gi ve the following figur s t aken from the co mpiled at t endance
reports on f ile in the Administrat ion Office.
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
Fall,197
rch 21 , 197
To al Enrollment
224 .1
2176.2
20 43.9
2015
1 37
Sine
, . II
• •
'-I
•
•
•
•
0 I • -
-4-
Mr. Martin thanked Mrs. Romans for her presentation, and then
set forth the ground rules for the Hearing . Proponents would
be given the opportunity to speak first, followed by opponents
to the request. He asked that all speakers come to the podium
and identify themselves by name and address . Mr . Martin asked
that those persons in favor of the rezoning speak at this time.
Mr. Bill Broomhall
Sitefinders R alty -stated that he was speaking for Mr. and
Mrs. Weaver, applicants, and for Mr. Carl
Wiebe, applicant. fr. Broomhall stated that he felt the R-2-B
Zone District would be beneficial to the neighborhood as a
"buffer " zone. Mr. Broomhall stated that property owners who
wish to sell or develop their land would be denied the true
value of their ·land if it is not rezoned . The present zone
classification will permit approximat ly seven units per acre ;
we are talking about $6,000 raw land cost; with improvements
such as curb, gutter, paving, etc., the cost will rise from
$2,000 to $4,000, and the finished land cost would approximate
$9,000. Improvement s would run about $45,000 and makes it
prohibitive to develop the area with ingle-family tructure .
However, it could be economically f asible to d velop a two-family.
Mr. Martin a ked if Mr. Wiebe had purchased land in the ar a
at thi time, or if he ha an option to purcha Mr . Broo hall
stated not at this time.
Ir. M rtin a ked if th r
of th propo
to sp ak.
Mr. Martin th n a k d for tho
Mr . Tid~ 11
2720 t Unio n v nu
d v.h prop r
ttt1on in pp
p r on oppo d to
in favor
y wi h d
ak.
ar
d that
100
• •
-
'-I
•
•
•
-
-5-
Green, Duckett and Tidwell ha v all s igned in opposition to the
propose d r ezoning . Mr s . Pierson asked Mr. Tidwell if he had
approa ched other property owners in the subject area to sign
the p eti tion. Mr . Tidwell stated he had not .
Mr. Martin asked who circulated the petition west o f South
Decatur ? Mr. Tidwell sta t ed th e "people i n the area ." Mr.
Tidwell s tated there is no sewer available to the residents
o f the ubje ct area . Mr. Tidwell further di cu sed the matter
of police protection in the area ; he s tat ed the only location
he has ever seen patrol car are in the park. ~. Tidwell
stated there has been no troubl in the a r a and they have had
no o ccasion to cal l for poli e personnel; howeve r, he does not
feel they "patrol " the area a de qua t ely . Ir. Tidwel 1 acknowledged
the Fire protection ha improved si nce co nstruction of the
F ire Station at Federal and Oxford in Sheridan .
Mr. Martin asked if Ir , Tidwell fe lt the police prot ction
would be improved if th r wer adequate ac es through th
subject area? Ir Tid\\ 11 ta ed that it would po sibly be
improved .
Mr. Jon s a k d if th portion of South Clay Street that is
dedi c at d i partial dedi cation or ull dedi ation? r . Tidwell
sta t d h b~li v d it i a 16' d d1cation.
d lived
nc or
zoo
11
h J. D.
th prop rt
th t1 ti on n
1 natur in
n
• •
' I
•
•
-
-6-
Mrs. Pierson asked for further explanation on the matter of
Police/Fire service in the area. Mr . Supinger stated that he
feels it is fair to say the Fire and Police service is better
in the area than it was prior to construction of the new Fire
Station at Ox ford and Federal; there is a much better response
time for the fire equipment. The lo ation of the fir e tation
wa chosen by a computer program which ~as developed by Public
Technolo gy, Inc., based on development patt rns and respon e
time to giv n areas. Mr. Supinger stated there i o ne patrol
car per each square mil e for the Ci ty, which is rea onably
high compared to other communities. The sta f is of th opinion
there is adequate police and fire protection of the area .
Mr. Jones asked if thi ubj ct area i within the 100-y ar
Flood Plain? Mr. Suping r tated he did not believe th ar a
is within the 100-year Flood Plain; it would, however, be i bin
the Standard Proj ct Flood Plain, which i based on a 200 -250
year storm . Even if the area wer within the 100-year
this would not me an that dev lopment could not o cur ;
regulation whi h t c rta i n standard that mu t b
improvem nts con tructed ithin a flood plain. Mr
stated that h did not f el th 100-y ar f lood p l in uld
a problem, v n if the ar a ~ r found o b within that
d ignation.
Mr. Du k et t
2 7 27 t n1on Av nu
hould
lnV t
• •
-
'-I
•
•
•
•
-
-7 -
Public Works Dir ct or Waggon e r stated there ar several way
sewer li nes could be financed: an Improvement District wi th
assessm nts on the cost of the improvements; all improvements
could be paid hy the init111 dev lop r in the area with an
agreement tha all tap~ would b repaid on a pro-rated basis;
or, installat on c uld be 1inanccd by the C1tv and recoup co ts on a p r tap ba is.
Mr . Supinger pointed out that the valley Sanitation Di trict
has tateJ they ha e capacity to accommodate 50 a d1t1onal
units rath r than 50 tap .
r . T1d11iPll reiterated ther is n available to the
pr p rt wn rs in the suh.1ect s1 t now; they ar all on septic
t nk , and all have th ir 1oparat lliat r y tern s. \Ir f1dwell
asked wh n h int rc•ptor lin was to b available tor us ? ~r. S p1n~cr ~tal d that h under toad it is to be op ratjonal
1n 197 • Ir. T1d 11 ai,keci l taps 11ould b ma d
river, or tram n1on'? Ir. Sup1n~ r .·tat d thi to
be work d out at a later date : th• atJ 1 only
ind1cat1· that plant cap.e1t lll b• available .
Mr. Ra Curt
29-4 \\' . t h
Hartm n
Cl .n n o -
• •
.... \
•
•
-
-8-
Mrs. Wad e stated that she was not aware South Decatur Street
is to be extended through to Bellev iew. Mr. Martin stated
he did not think there were any immediate plans for such ex-tension.
Mrs. !aye F rguson
2740 West Union Avenue -stat.ed the Valley Sanitation District
sewer line runs down South Decatur. Mrs. Ferguson stated that the only way persons living on the
east of South D catur would have acces to use th ewer line
is by appli ation to the Sanitation Distri ct; sh stated that
sh and her hu band had mad application to the District in
1964, an d have the right to tap onto the sewer line. There is
uffic1ent c apacity available to accommodate 50 units. lrs .
Fer u on stated that h f It th re would be approximately 7
acre to b developed if th rezoning is approved, three acre
of which are her . Mr • F rgu on di cussed the prob! m of
rising asse sm nts on her prop rty in the la t two year ; she
noted that he cannot do anything on th property to brin in
income, and that he i rctir d and the financial burd n is
quit difficult. Mr • F r u on tated that her i polic
protection in th area, and that th y quit fr qu n l patrol the area.
Ir. Broomhall tated that h had called Ir . Feistner in Sun
City, Arizona, and that r . Fei tn r i in favor of th r -
zoning. H i to end Ir . Broo hall a letter to tha eff ct .
Mr. Broomhall tated that h und r tood Mr. Parr i al
favor of the rczonin , but that h cannot o f ficially Mr . Parr.
t
•
-
...._ I
•
•
•
0 I • -
-9-
expensive, and he felt the persons in the area .hou ld be aware
of thi fact. Mr . Clinger tated here would also be expense
involved in dev loping stree t s, curb, gutter, sidewalks, etc.
Mr. Supinger s t ated that the improvcm nt that would need to
be installed to erve thi , or any oth r area, ar ba ed on
user fees; if the s •er lin • rC' n eded o nly to ere the
area in question, it •ould hav to be financed by h owner
of the property so s r ed. ~r . Supinger tated hat all tr et
improvement are th e~pon ib1l1tv of the prop rty owner to
fina n ce . Mr Sup1nger ta ed that any new tre t con tructed
in the area would b construct d by the dev lop r to standards
set forth i n th City r gulat1ons . Adjoi n in prop rt ies that
are benefi tted by . uch improvPm nts ar assessed the co t of tho e improvem nts.
Th P hhc It a1in d.
\
ot
in
t
ar
nd
t
ir
if
•
f
-10-
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion carried.
•
0 -
Mr. Martin stated the Commission would not reach a deci ion
on the request at this meeting ; he tated that the Commission
has considerable material to be c onsidered further before
reaching a decision.
Mr . Martin declared a r cess at 9:15 p .m.
The meet ing was called to order at 9:25 p.m.
PRE SENT: Brown, Jones, Jorgenson, Martin, Parker, Pierson,
Smith, Wade
ABSENT : Tanguma :
Mr. lartin declared a quorum present.
IV. MASTER STREET PLAN
i\iDendment
Wade moved :
CASE Jt20-75
Smith cond d: The Public Hearin• on Ca e =20-75 be op n d.
AYES : Wad ' Smith
Bro n, Jon , Jor n. on, I rtin, P rk r, Pi r on,
AYS : • on
ABSE T: T n urn a
Th mot ion l'arr1 d.
J'I nt t • •
Yale Avenue
(
u. s. 285
Tufts Avenue /Union Avenue
Chenango Avenue
Lowell Boulevard
Zuni Street
T Jon Str et
Platt River Drives
Columb1n Fr • ay Corridor
Str t
Huron t
ox
t
t
n t h n k 1 r
•
-
-11-
Remove designation as an
"Arterial" from Broadw ay to
Federal; designate as a
"Collector" from Broadway to Ela ti.
Ch ange designation from a ''Freeway "
to that of an "Arterial".
Designate as an "Arterial" from
Windermere to Federal.
Continue "Collector" designation
east to South Logan Street and
west from Bannock t o Huron.
Designa t as a ''Collector".
Up-grade to an "Arterial" and
xt nd d ignation b tween Evans nd s. 2 5 .
R due d i nation from an
''Arterial" to that o f a "Collector"
b t~ en Evan and Dartmouth.
D let d ignation a a "Coll ctor"
&outh of W . t D rt outh Av nu
1 t e.
Div rt d l nation a an "Arteri l"
to Navajo Str t 11 nm nt bet e n
Tuft and Oxford.
D ignat
t n Quin
d 1 nation a
n l • • 2 nd
tor''
Vi W,
D l nat a a "Coll ctor" b -
t n \al and K nyon.
nd-
t n 1 on?
• •
I
•
•
0 -
-12-
Mr. James Walsh
3242 South Elati -stated that when the shopping cente r was
co nstructed, there was a guarantee it would
not disrupt the residential area to the no rth; if the island
at Floyd and Elati is removed, it wil l definitely disrupt the
resi dential ar ea, and South Elati Street will be a "drag stri p "
from Dartmouth south. Mr. Walsh stated there a r e many children
in the area, wh o ride their bicycle in the street, and it will
prove hazardous to those ch ildren .
Mrs. Pierson suggested that persons wishing to speak reg arding
one part icu lar st reet should be h ard co n secuti v e ly , and then
proceed to another proposed amendment t o hear comments. Th e
Co mmi ssion agreed , and Mr. Martin a ked that all those wh o
wish d to speajt regard i ng South Elati Street would b e heard at this tim •
Mr. Homer Todd
3258 South Elati -tat d h felt de ignating South Elati Street
a a collector ~ould c au e problems wi th the
Polic e /Fir center, and their n ed d access to South El ati.
Mr. Todd stated there hav be n ev ral me eting r gardi n g the
r e moval of the island, and th property owner have had "to
protect El at i man y tim r.T dd th n discu s d the location
of the school on Dartmouth and Elat1 and tat d he felt designa-
tion of F.lati as a co ll ctor and remov1n h i land would en-
dang r the children who att nd that ,chool
r . ary Wal h
3242 outh Elati
and r triction of
a Coll ctor Street
of th tr t
a two-lan treet?
•
• •
r
•
•
•
•
0 -
-13-
Mr. Supinger tated he felt the implicati on is clear that if
Elati is designated as a Co llector, the traf fic island at
Floyd would be r moved; th re would be additional traffic on
the street. Mr. Supinger stated that the total proposal is
for the designation of Delaware /Elat1 to erve as collector
streets from Yale to Bellevi w through the western portion of
the City . The purpose i to lunn 1 traffic from the local
streets to the arterial streets --it does not m an that all
traffic will u e the collector as thru streets . Mr. Supinger
stated he could not say there will not be additional traffic on the tr et .
~. Kulp noted that the traffic into th hopping cent er is
only imped d by th top ign at Floyd Avenue. Mr. Kulp noted
th at Bannock and Sherman ar servin a collector streets now,
and are handling the t raffic very well Ir. Kulp stated he
could e no r al reason for removing the island at Elati a nd
Floyd, and de i~nating Elnti a, a collector tr et . H tated
that v ryon who live in a r ident1al area want to k p
traffic at a minimum , .lr. Kulp a cknowl dged that many motorists
do "go around ' the island, but it do redu the p d of tho e
mo tori ts . tr. Kulp rei t rated he i oppo d to h removal o f the island.
Ir. lartin a ked if there a a formal do
stat d th r i •nt north of Floyd Av nu
fro the traff1 to and trom th hopping
Ir .
3231
lartha Scott
OU h f.l ti tr t -
tion •
•
/
•
t•
•
-14-
Discussion followed. 1r. Parker stated that whether or not
the Floyd Avenue Agreement is a binding document should make
no difference ; the City ha a moral obligation to leave the
traffic is land at Elati and Floyd. Mr. Parker stated he felt
the City may well have b en in error in the removal of the
Cherokee/Floyd island.
Mr. Wal h and 1rs. Scott both asked that the residents of the
area be not ified of any meeting where the matter of the island
removal would b considered. Mr • Scott stated there are only
three or four families in th block that have not expressed an
opinion regardin th island removal. Mrs. Scott then read
the following l tt r from Mr . Einer Burget stating his opposition
to the propo al.
/tf 7J
"[,l ~I ~ '\\.A.. I { '
' Zi ~ti ·.; j Cl u..,.~ l < ~
t: 1 1.. •
< -#
(.,;..<t ~ (I..
'
'
• •
•
•
•
0 -
-15-
Mr. Denni Kelley
2393 West Warren -stated that he was present regarding the
proposed designation of South Zuni Street
as an arterial and the propos ed change in de ignation on S o uth
Tejon from arterial to collector. ~r . Kelley stated that
South Zuni Street goes through a re id ntial area, and Tejon
serves the industrial a rea t o the a!>t. Mr . Kelley s tated
that Zun i coul d not extend throu~h to U.S. 285 --there i
an industrial development in h ~ay. Ir . Kelley stated there
was no r a on to de ignate Zun1 as an Arterial --it cannot
carry the traffic flo~ that an art rial tr et hould carry .
Furth rmore, it i n ear the chool and th children have to
walk ither on South Tejon or Sou h Zuni to t to th chool
from the nor h . De ignat1on a an ar ter i al would incr a s
the traffi throu gh the re identi 1 ar a .
Mr. Cape ius
2350 W t Warren -s at d tha
or
and
n
• •
•
0 I• -
-16-
Mr. Waggoner stated that application has been made for Federal
funding under the Urban Systems Program, and a project number
has been assi g ned to the South Zuni improvement. Denver has
money budgeted for improvement of Zuni from Yale to Dartmouth;
Englewood also has funds budgeted for this improvement. Mr.
Waggoner stated that he felt the Environmental Impact Statement
is the only thing holding up the improvement . This would in-
clude the purchase of right-of-way on D nver's side, and the relocation of fi ve homes in that area .
Mr. Brown asked for further clarification on the problems with
police protection in the area . Mr. Capesiu tated that if a
Denver patrol car sees a speeder on the east side of the street,
it is Englewood's responsibility ; if an Englewood patrol car
s es a speeder .on the we t side of the street, it is Denver's
respon ibility, and if th re is an accident in the midd l e of
the street "there are arguments" on whose responsibility it is.
Mr. Cape ius stated he felt they had the best luck with the D nver Police Fore
fr, Brown th n a k d about th lack of signing for school
Children. Mr. Cape iu tated that requests hav been made
thre time in the pa t y ar for ign1ng along South Zuni;
they have ask d th School Board, th Principal, t ., and noth i n ha been don .
r. Waggon~r
to hi office
r.
can
oJ Hi •h ay
b n ubmitted
r alize that
chool . He
anoth r tr t
d for
ra ion
r
l
'
•
.,
•
-
-17-
Mr. Supinger stated he felt the designation were the s ame.
It was determined it would be pretty unlikely there would
be a "freeway" along the U.S. 285 route . Mr. Supinger did
a cknowledge there are some severe traffic problems along this corridor .
Mr. Shaffer stated he was told there is s ome money budgeted
for study of U.S. 285 ; he stated he did not know if th e City
had participated or plans to participate in a study.
Mr. Waggoner stated that a Freeway has c o ntrolled access, wh ich
U.S. 285 doe not. A Freeway would have interchanges rather
than at-rade cro si ng as .s . 285 has . Mr . Waggoner st at ed
the City staff did not feel there was a p o ssibi l ity of getti n g
i nterchange s on crossings on U.S . 285, or of getting a ccess
roads on either sid of the highway . Ir . Wa ggon er stated he
felt thi is on of he basic reasons for the change in designa-
tion from Fr eway to Art rial. Mr. Wagg oner stated that in
1973, 20,000 wa budgeted in th Highway Fu nd f or tudy on
U.S . 28 5 adjacent to Ci nder lla City to try to come up with
alternat to handle the raff1c flow . Mr.Waggoner tated
that a 1 tt r ha be n subm1tt d to ~r. Brash r of th State
High ay p rtment a king th .tatu of th 20,000.
cu d .
r
Fre way ; h asked
Driv , or to a location
tat d th propo al i
pr viou ly ho n on
d that 1 nt
art Tl 1 n
d.
d for a
Mr.
r -
• •
-18-
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion carried .
•
0 I • -
Mr. Martin asked the Commission what they wis h e d to do on this
matter .
Parker mov ed:
Pierson seconded : The Planning Commission recommend to City
Council the proposed amendments to the
Master Street Plan, with th deletion of South Elati Street
as a Collector from Yale to K nyon, and the deletion o f South
Zuni Street as an arterial ; the designation on Tejon Street to
be changed from th propos d c ollector back to the existing
arterial designation.
Jones moved :
Br o wn econded : The matt r of the Master Str et Plan a me n dment
b tabl d for further opportunity to study the
affect of the proposed am ndments on the total Plan .
AYES: Martin; Smith ; Wad ; Jon ; Jorg non ; Brown
NAYS: Park r ; Pier on
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion arri d.
Jone mov d :
Parker ond d;
th Planning Commi
information 1or th
m tin
d.
amen m nt
ing of
talled
th i
1 ll • , Br , Jor n on,
T·
'
•
•
•
V . PROPOSED OR DINANCE
Moving & Demolition
of S tructure s
•
-I •
-1 9 -
CASE #2-75
Mr . Supinger reviewed the changes in the proposed ordinance
that were mad e following the Publi Hearing on June 3 , 1975 .
Parker moved: Draft v, dated June 11, 1975 , of the pro posed
ordinance on lovement and Demolition of Structures
be recommended to City Coun cil for approval.
Wade seconded:
AYES: Pi r on, Smith, Wad , Brown, Jones, Jorge nson, Martin,
Parker
NAYS:
ABSENT:
on
Tanguma
1b mot ion arried.
VI. CE cas ,;tl7-75
Cas ::tlS-75
endm nt that th • tv.o propos d Comp r h n i.v
Zanin Ordinan n nt !ollowin th Public Hearing Jun
3, 1 75, v. r pointed out to th rommi ion.
ant d to ak
and that h had
n lo d on
r . Di ckmann
ubmitted a 1 tter
hich h
•
•
•
,. -
-20-
developed, provided the front age is not less than 60 feet,
and the area not less than 7,200 square feet. Mrs. Romans
stated she felt this is a good provision , and perhap it
should be modified to apply to the proposed R-3 District.
Jones mov d:
Wade second ed: The Planning Commission recommend to City
Counc il the approval of the proposed amend -
ments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as set forth in
Draft V, dated June 3, 1975, the proposed amendments being
the R-2 Med ium Density District, and the R-3 High Density
Oistrict.
AYES: Smith, Wade, Brown, Jones, Jorgenson, Martin, Parker,
Pier on
NAYS: on
ABSENT : Tan uma
ni mot ion carried.
VII. DIRE TOR 'S CHOICE
tated the tafI had a v ry productive me ting
own r in h Santa Fe /Union Ann xation ar a,
and felt that mo t of th probl ms had been worked out . He
stat d he f lt the propo, d tr et plan i in order, and that
a Public H aring dat could e • Di cu follo~ d . It
wa d t nnin d that a Public H aring on th la ter Str t Plan
for th Santa F / nion nn xation Area would b s t or July
22nd.
r .
Plan
han
th
d
rd
n
n
l
Oriv •
1
ul
h pro bl
i . io m
1( pr
th t
p .
r h
d by City
olution
or RTD,
ll . rath r
7· P·•·
• •
,
•
I•
•
-21-
MEMORAN DUM TO 'IllE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUN CIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RECOMM ENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: June 17 , 1975
SUBJECT : Proposed Ordinance re: Movement and Demolition
of Structures.
RECOMMENDA TI 0
Parker moved:
Wade seconded: Draft v, dated June 11, 1975, of the proposed
ordinance on 1ovement and Demolition of
Structure b recommended to City Council for
approval .
AYES: Pierson, Smith, Wade, Brown, Jone , Jorgenson, Martin,
Parker
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tanguma
ni motion carri d .
Re pectfully ubmitted,
ity Plannin
ion
•
......
(
•
0
·, •
-22-
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSI ON.
DATE: June 17, 1975
SUBJECT: Amendment of the Comprehensive Zoning Ord inance
RECOMMENDATION :
Jones moved :
Wade seconded: 1be Planning Commission recommend to City
Council the approval of the proposed amend-
ments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as et forth in
DRAFT V, dat d June 3, 1975, the proposed amendments being
the R-2 Medium Density District, and the R-3 High Density District.
AYES : Smith , Wade, Bro wn, Jon , Jorgen on, M rtin, Park r, Pie r on
NAYS: Non
ABSENT : Tanguma
1be motion carried.
Re pectfully submitt d,
By Order of th City Pl nnin
and Zonin • ommi ion.
'
• •
•
0 I •
•
POLICE PENSION BOARD MEETING
July 2, 1975
Th e City of Englewood Police Pension Board me on July 2, 1Q75
at 3:45 P.M. Pre sen t were:
William D. James, Director of Finance
ayor James Taylor
Dr. W. W. aercklein, City Physician
Barbara Hughe s , A orney for Grady Brackeen
Bernard Betardini, Ci y Attorney
Larry Leyden, Board ember
Grady Brackeen, La Technician
Th e m eting was called o order by Bill James, Chair an. He
explained that the purpose of the meeting was o consid r a
disa il re irement request or Gra dy ra~keen. ~e asked
r . Br c en to xplain 1 s reason s for t · reques .
r. Brack s ated t a t he did not have any comment s to lfe at his t im His attorney, Ms. Hughes, s ta ed t at h do<>o;
no t feel he can take on-call duty, and is is d tri en
0 h s e 1 f, as w 11 as 0 he rest of the departmen
tat d tti hi" job is a v ry he c i one .
r . Brack e n o de in
en o
r.
• •
•
0
•
P l;ce P si r [ocrrj eeting -Ju1y 2, J7 ag 2
,.
T~ere was general d i scussion regarding the on-call part of he lab techn·cian's job.
4t his po i n in he mee ing, Mr. Brackeen was a sked to leave the roo
Or. Ma erc le discussed the doctors' reports. He eels that
r. Brac~een lac s any drive and push, and stated that Mr.
Brackeen is a very depressive type person. Or. Ma rcklei
sa·d that the back prob lem which is he reas on or the request
for r tr men is ot the real proble , a his men al cond't ·on is i terfering wit he physical condition.
Board mem er
in positio i eydo said that
necessary. r. Brae e could be downgraded
Dr. Maercklei sa1d t at he or opedic conditio could be
aggrava ed by the men al conditio s h is i n a cons nt of ental s ress.
In a report fro Dr. Maqill, he s a ed hat he fel
Brae een was 60 disabl d. Howev r, Or. rckle n
feels that i 1s a psychiatric proble and maybe we
another doc or's op ion before rend rin g a d c is io retirement req ues
~ yor Tylo r r It
r qard n t e hiq
t e Po lice depar
mee in s
ave ad in
nd r. Brackeen o anot er
t ~ . 0
et ano er rP or ~ro
h oc 0 PPO
• : • p ••
• •
,
(
•
•
•
•
0
•
ELECTION COMMISSION MEE ING
July 18, 1975
The Election Commission meeting wa s called to o rder at
5:05 P.M. Those present were :
Commission members Mary Lou Newport
Lois Gilbert
William D. James , Director of
Finance
Also present: Eric Johannisson, Deputy City Clerk
Mr. James discussed the purpose of the meeting wh ich was to
announce the vaca ncy on the Career Service Board created by
e resigna ion of H. P. Braun . The position is one elec ed
by the Englewood mployees. herefore, E ec ion Co~mission
must s ablish an election da e and run an e ec ion to f 11
this vacancy.
T e Elec ion Commission agreed to:
1. Es 1 sh September 18, 1975 as he el ec ion da e to fill
e vacancy on he Career Service Board .
2. D rec Eric Johannisson to draw up a c lendar for the
elect'on.
3. Mee ag ain during the last wee in July.
The eetinq was adjourn d a 5:2 P.M .
4 c \
'
• •
(
•
•
0
•
MINUTES
BOARD OF CAREER ~ERVICE COMMISSIONERS
July 17, 1975
PRESENT: H.R. Hosanna, Charles Zartman, William Hanson,
Jo Ellen Turner
ABSENT: H.R. Braun
ALSO
PRE SE T: Rich Lorig , Loren Ward
Ch airman Hosanna introduced Jo Ellen Turner , the recent Council
appointee to the Career Se rvice Board. Mrs. Turner will
4 0
replace Winifred Uhl inger, fulfilling her term which will expire
March 15, 1976.
• • • *
DR. ZARTMAN MOVED, AND MR. HANSON SECONDED, TO APPROVE THE
MI UTES OF THE MEETING OF JUNE 19, 1975.
Ayes: Hosanna, Zartman, Turner , Hanson
Nays: None
The motion carried.
• * * *
Mr. Lorig reported to he Board for informational purposes tha
there were several r ievances in the works. One related
o overtime for Ser ean s and Lieutenants in the Police Depar ment,
which may o r may no be rievable. The others included
grievance by a po lice of i er who was passed over on an eli i ility
lis , and h o hers concer erl le t er in the em ployee's
personnel file and her r qu o a end a seminar whi ch was
e ied.
The riev n ces h d
r eview t • rn , r.ow ver
th m.
I *
h s age wh re he Board would
fe they should e aware of
1v n
n
r men h a
fi ht r ex
physical a
07
• •
•
•
•
0 -
* * * •
The Fire Department was the only association represented, and
they had nothing to discus~~
* * * •
Under Commissioners' Choice, the Board asked the procedure for
election or a new Board member and how far the procedure had
progressed. Mr. Lorig explained the steps to be followed in
holding such an election and that the associations were now
in the process of finding candidates for their nomination.
* • • *
Mr. Lorig told the Board that the Firefighters' Association
had ratified the negotiation package but reserved the right
to further negotiate one item in the contract concerning payment
of overtime.
• • • •
DR. ZARTMAN MOVED, AND MR. HANSON SECONDED , TO CERTIFY THE ELIG-
IBILITY LIST FOR THE POSITION OF BATTALION CHIEF IN THE FIRE
DEPARTMENT.
Ayes: Hosanna, Zartman, Hanson, Turner
ays: None
The motion carried.
* * * •
DR. ZARTMAN MOVED, AND MR. HANSON SECONDED TO APPROVE THE
FOLLOWING PERSONNEL ACTIONS:
NAME DEPT. & TITLE GRADE & STEP
Prob tionary o perm. s atus without increase in pay:
KOTOW KI, Linda
PI 0 , • x
Pro o ion:
ALL£ , l h
HALL,
Wom n's Recreation Superv isor
effective 7/1 /75
L b. Technici n -Police err c ive 7/16/7 5
Oft'icer la Claaa
ive .
7/1/75
o Lie t -Po11c
6/20/75
208
• •
•
Anniversary Increases:
ATKINS, Malcolm
BARESEL, David
BELTON, Phyllis
BURGER, Daniel
CANAVATE, Josetta
FRIEDLAND , Mikel
MCCORMICK, William
MCDOWELL , Robe r t
NELSON, R. Craig
VAUGHN, Jerald
Progress Reports:
Alfred Rhoades
Loren Ward
Jeff Vis conti
John Curtice
Homer Richard
Violet Gardner
Be ttie S lz
Ray Schne ider
Robert Manchego
Don Br aunreit r
s.
The o o n carrie •
•
0 I•
•
Electrical Inspector
effective 8/16/75
Maint./App.Opr. -Water
effective 8/1/75
Emergency Communicator
effective 8/16/75
Police Officer 4th Class
Police Officer 3rd Class
effective 8/16/75
Emergency Communicator
effective 8/16/75
Emergency Communicator
effective 8/16/75
Plant Operator -Util .
effective 8/16/75
Engineerin~ Aide I
effective /16/75
Police Officer 4th
Police Officer 3rd
effective 8/16/75
Police Officer 2nd
Police Officer 1st
effective 7/1/75
Finance
Fire
Police
Water Prod.
Fire
Recrea ion
Police
Fire
Build in M int.
Fire
Claes
Class
Class
Class
7B to
7C
Prod.2C to
2D
4B to
4C
to
4B to
4C
4B to
4C
6C to
6D
3B to
to
to
Ayes: Hoa nn , Hans on , Za rtman, Turner.
aya: on
• • • •
in no rur h r b e1n •• o 1acuae, wa e dJourn d.
209
• •
,
TO.
•
•
INTft.OfflCI
MIMOIANDUM
Andy Mccown , City Manager DATI:
, .
4 E
July 24, 1975
l'ltOM: Kells Waggoner
suaJICTi WEST HARVARD AVEN UE
There have been many questions raised by the property owners
along w. Vassar Avenue, specifically the 2000 -2 300 blocks,
as to th sidewalk grades installed during Paving District
No. 22 construction. Attached is a cros s-section of the
street at 2190 w. Harvard venu which shows the original
ground as a long and shor t ~ and also shows the relat ive
location of the new roadway with th original ground. As
you can se , there is very little difference. We do have
almost the maximum cross 11 ~ that is, dif erenc in el -
vation from on side of he street to th othe r, within the
proposed roadway section. The original ground actually
slopes more than the maximum crossfall from back-of-walk to
back-of-walk, and this is what's causing the concern by th
property owners.
The cross-sec ion also shows hat we are maintaining the
30-inch minimum cover over th top of th 20-inch high-pre -
sure gas m in located in the center of the str et. It also
shows ha we are fairly well matching the exis ing ground
with the back-of-walk along the nort edge of the roadway,
as well as he fac that we have about a one-foo fill a the
back of walk on th south id of he roadw y. If we were to
have match d he south sid of the roadw y with he ori inal
ground, th cover over h lin would h ve b n oelo~
minimum and we would h one-foo cut hen at bac -
of-walk long he nort Und r the circum tancea, w
w re f irly well s to o r d sign.
Sine r ly ,
r
uhl c · rks
/ls
'A ch .
•.
'
• •
•
•
I
I
' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I•
'•
• •
-,
•I
(
•
0
•
COUNCI L ACTION REQUEST
LIQUOR AJiD J.2 BEER OUTLETS
APPLICANT:
Bob's Grocery
329 So. Washington St.
Enq ewood, Colorado
TYPE OF ACTIO REQ fESTED:
Renewal of 3.2 beer license
POLICE AND FBI REPOR~
See a ached.
. " nuR NG PRIOR YEARS,
..
• •
,
,
(
•
pl. 0 70
•
0 -
S ATE OF COLOR A DO
DEPARTMEN T OF REVENUE
RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR 3 .2 ~
FERMENTED MALT BEVERAGE LICENSES
DO NOT W'llTE IN T~IS PA.Cl
(GET APPROVAL OF LOC AL LICENSING AUTHOR ITY FIRST) LIQUOR ENFORCEMENT OFFICER'S AC TION
, ,
L ., l l
I CERTIFY THAT THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO MY ORIGINAL APPLICATION
EXCEPT CHANGE Of MANAGER TRADE NAME OR CO RPOR ATE ST RUCTURE .
SIG NATUU
APPROVED
DISAPPROVED
,.:-:· -I
OATl
•II
llCfMUr 'f~t, .. c ... r Mn ,,;, ............... ~/
If THI Q~ IS A (H AN f IN OWNERSHIP 00 NOT USE THIS FORM . USE AN ORIGINAL APPLI CATION l
1"PORTAN' MANAGt•, "IAME µ 6'ck' r--.5: ~/ d L /P MAKE CHECK oR .v.oNEY
~ff ><SIRUCllCNS
0 .... '1-i[ ltf\lfJf\
l 1-I
'Y f
IF AP•LICANT 15 A CORPOhTION Fill IN RfVfRSE SID£
NEW 'JU.OE N"-ME
•o• 1 7'!b rc• ... fNT[O MAlT 8£VEP•G• llCfNSE FOR THE YEAR ENDING ..
; 1
AME ANO DESCR•PTION Of l•C EN ... _(
ORDER PAYABlf lC !Hf
COLOR ADO DEPA•TMfNT
Of RfVfNUE
TOTAL FEE S l
FEE
·-
•.
• •
-,
(
•
• I•
•
tlEJORANDUM
TO: ~i rector o f Financ
FROM: Po I ice partrnent
()ATE : July 1, 1975
SUBJECT: LIQUOP OUTLET CALLS -Cll'S GROCERY , 3296 S. WASHINGTON
Pleas~ b~ advised th
th I quor I 1c nse a
pol ce departrnen+ has received r.o cal Is concer i'1g
t"P •bove es Tao I 1 sh nt during he past year.
Pob rt L. • ,.. n
Ac+ i ng Ch I f ,.., ' Po I I c
ez
'
• •
,,
•
•
0 I • -
-13-
~IEM ORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOO D CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RE COMME DATION OF TllE CITY PLANN I NG AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: July 22. 1 975
SUBJECT : Revision of the Proposed Ordinan e on Movement and
Demolition of Structure
RE CO M~IE NDA TI ON :
Jones moved:
Pie rs on seco n ded: The Co mmission recomme n d to City Counc i 1
the fo l lowing revision to the proposed
ordinance on Maving and Demolition of Structures l>e approved :
3-8 -7 PERFORMAN E BONDS --STR CTURE MOVER OR OW ER
(a) STRU L TU RE MOVER
A P rJ01·mance a n d Co mpl lion Bond, or oth r in-
. urance bond. ace ptabl to the Chi f Buildin g
Olli ial. and proof th r on in writing by th
insuring ompany , shall I> po t d by th Structur
lover prior to issuanc o1 the lovin• P rmit .
The oond. of at lea t 5,000, shall in ur th
ne e s ary cost of rai ing th tructur from th
existing toundation, moving the tru tur to th
new sit . placing th tru ture on th n w founda-
tion. a w 11 a the co t of 1 aning , filling and
1 v ling the sit from which th tru tur
u in th ity of Englewood. within 4 of
1·•moval. Said bond hall IJ• incr
minimum 5,000 if th hi 1 Building u t•1·m111 that th d <'O t ,.
(.> t OU t • w l 11 I 11 u h l' • a nd
a t 1 a .t qual of th an ic1p l d
co t:-, ha 11 b ·
Cb) OW R
5 s~
'
• •
,
•
•
0
•
-14-
out will exceed $5,000 . In such case, a bond at
least equal to the amount of the anticipated costs
shall be required.
•'·
AYES : Martin ; Parker; Pierson ; Smith; Tanguma; Wade; Brown;
Jones; Jorgenson
NAYS : None
ABSENT: None
The motion carried .
Respectfully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission •
i~i(;"'~ Recording Secretary
•.
I
..
• •
,
VI. MOVING & DEMOLITION ORD INANCE
Su ggeste d Revisions
•
0 -
-6-
CASE #2-75
Mr. Supinger stated that the sugge ted revisions to the Moving
a nd Demolition Ordinance are a re ult of City Cou ncil opinion
the praposed ordinance was not specific enough i n the provision
a utho ri zing the Chief Building Inspector to require a greater
than minimum bond . Mr. Supinger stated that he had conferred
with City Attorney Berardini, and the proposed revision was
drafted. Mr. Supi n ger stated that City Cou ncil asked for a
report ba ck to them a s s oo n as po sible .
Mr. Jone stated that t he matt er of the proposed Moving and
Demolit i on Ordi n a n ce ha d been set for Public Hearing on
August 4th ; it -w as not felt nece sary to hold a Publi c Hearing
~efore th e Comm ission on the revision to th proposed Ordinance.
Jones moved :
Pierson seconded : The Commis sion recomm end to City Council
th following r vi ion to the proposed ordinance
on Moving and Oemolition of Structur be app rove d:
3-8-7 PERFORMA NCE BO DS
(a ) STRUCTIJRE MOVER
C ) 0 .R
STRUCTURE 10 ER OR OWNER
d
' '
• •
,
•
•
I • -
-5-: ( ~!rs. ~lar tha Seo t t ~
3231 Sout h Elati Street -stated that the citizans who liv in
, the 3100 and 3200 bl ks of South
the efforts the Planni 7 and Zoning
·ion have exerted in their behalf. Mrs. cott tated
e resid nts understand that it is a moral ob ation
legal obli gatio n, and she felt the resid s would
the removal of the island if it was de rmined
necessary. Mr . Scott stated she did ot believe
·s a hindrance to the fire and polic
he ha seen them go around the is nd. Mrs.
d appreciation for the cooperat · n fr om the
ho11ever, a
again expres
Commission in
neJghhorhoo d. ·e erving the re idential cha cter of the
Discus ion f ollo11ed,
The vote wa all d.
:\YES: Pi r on ; Smith:
Martin; Parker
\\YS: "Ion
-\RSl:lllT: one
Thi.' motion C":irri d.
\'. lO'.IPRl'.llE SJ \'E
fl<.>f1n1 ion o
PJ'H'O\
he appreciated th
nts of the area i
Brown ; Jones; Jorg nson ;
nd l t t • II
CASE ::21-75
ompr -
II r 1 n
th
ddfn11on,
n
• •
•
•
•
0 -
necessary construction, irx: luding: structural,
electrical, plumbing and heating construction re-
quireJ to bring the moved s tructure into complian~e
with the curreht Building Code. Said bond shall
be increa ed above the minimum $5,000 if the Chief
Building Official determines that the anticipated
costs of the necessary construction as above set
out will exceed $5,000. In such case, a bond at
least equal to the amount of the anticipated costs
shall be required.
AYES: Martin; Parker ; Pierson; Smith ; Tanguma ; Wade ; Brown ;
Jones; Jorgenson
NAYS: None
ABSENT : None
The motion carried.
VII DIRECTOR'S CHOICE.
Ir. Supinger stated that no new Public Hearing date for the
Santa Fe/Union Annexation area Master Street Plan has been
set . Ci ty Council has not yet determined whether or not to
appeal the Court decision. Mr. Supinger stated it would be
his sugg tion that a date for Public Hearing be scheduled; if
City Cou ncil determines the matter should not be appealed, the
Publi Hearing would be cancelled •
.!r. Park r a ked if 1 t would be belt r to do nothing on the
matt r until Council has reached a decision on the appeal?
Mr . Lee tat d that as long a the matter i in court and/or
on app al, lhe land i con id red to be in the City, and
hould be tr ated as such and r eiv th benefits of other
prop rty in th ity.
ouncil had planned to reach a
tin July 21 t; however, ther were
t w f lt th matter hould b
m mber hip of City ouncil .
Jon
Park
II r1n .. dat
nn ."<al1 in
d :
m
for th
Pl nn ing Commi ion d lay until th
tin• o Augu t 5th, th matt r of
a t r Str t Pl n in th Sant
n xt
Publi
nion
'r'.
\'S :
\B f.~T;
l \ ll
r
on: M rt n; P r r ; P1 r on:
J n
rr1 d.
h ; T um Wad
• • •
•
•
0 -
-o-
VIII. COMMISSION'S CHOICE.
r. Martin stated he is in recipt of a letter from Mayor
i dicating the City Counci•l· is going to be looking at 1 g-range
rehensive planning for the City of Englewood, and asking
ity Planning and Zoning Commission to sit in on th e meeting
e Council. Mr . !artin stated that the date tor the
could be at the convenience of the Commis s.lon .
followed. Mr. Jones stated that he felt part of the
ehind the proposed meeting is the capital lmprove~ents
11 departments are preparing a li.t of needed
capital imp vements for consideration by t1-City Council. ·
Mr. Jones sta ed the City Planning Commiss <>n is required to
propose a fiv ear Capital Improvement Prt>gram, and to also
provide a year--year up-date of that pi'Qgram.
Mr. Martin stated hat the Capital Jmpl'Qvement Program is ex-
pected to be consi red by the Commis-ion very shortly. Mr.
Mart in stated that i the meeting with Council is to cover the
Capital Improvement gram also, uld it be duplication for
the members of the Co ·ssion and esult in considerable tiae
being expended in the i tial ideration of the Capital
Improvement Program and ation to City !anager Mccown,
to th n meet with the Cit il to discuss the recommendation?
Di cussion followed.
th l tter regarding
noted that it should be t
Planning for th City
plans.
Mr. Brown
with di cu
commi ion
Council.
expre ed on the wording of
rang planning", and twas
i ion who initiates the
cil would then implement the
me ting to concern d
ady pa d throu h th
impl m nted by the City
, that
• •
•
0
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ci ty Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM : J. L . Supinger, Director of Community Development
DATE : July 17, 1975
SUBJECT: Structure Moving or Demolition Ordinance -Performance
Bonds
In City Counc~l discussion of the Bill for an Ordinance re:
Structure Moving or Demolition, concern was expressed regarding
the ambiguity of the expressed authority of the Chief Building
Official to increase the minimum bond "if he deteraines that
a greater amount is necessary to a ure coverage of co•pletion
costs." Becau e of the expre ed concern, the City Council
has requested that this provi i on be referred back to the Co•-
miaaion for clarification and reco..,..endation prior to the
Public Hearing on the proposal Augu t 4, 1975.
To assist you with your con ideration, I have collaborated
with Mr . Berardini to develop a propo al which I feel specifically
d fines the li•it within which the Chief Building Official
would be required to i ncrease th bond . While Mr . Berardini
bas not had an opportunity to approve this second draft, I
have attempted to include all of bi suggestions. By the ti•e
of your aeeting, hop to have any additional auggeations
fro• Kr. Berardini.
sp ctfull~~tt .d'
~~-..---
JAMES L. PINGER
Dir tor of COllllunity v lopa n
ncl : Bill for Ordinanc
Mr. M Co•n da d July 9, 1 75
of Prop d R i o ot 13--7
•
• •
,
3-8-S
•
•
, .
•
REQUIRED INSPECTION
Inspection of the structures proposed to be
moved shall be made by both the Code · Enforce-
ment and Traffic Engineering Divisions prior
to issuance of a permit.
PERMIT -FEE -EXPIRATION
A moving perait fee for structure to be aoved
to a site within the City of Englewood shall
be $50.00 and for structures to be moved
through or out of the City shall be $ZS.OO.
All said moving permits shall expire sixty
(60) days after date of issuance.
PERFORMANCE BONDS -OTHER
A Performance and Completion Bond, or other
insurance bond, acceptable to the Chief
Building Official, and proof thereon in writing
by the insuring company, shall be posted by
the Structure Mover prior to issuance of the
penait. The bond, of at lease SS,000, (aay
be increased by the Chief Building Official
if he determines that a greater aaount is
necessary to assure coverage of coapletion
costs) shall insure necessary cleaning, filling
and leveling the site in the City of Enalewood,
froa which the structure is moved, within 48
hours after th e structure is removed from the
site.
CAS H DEPOSIT
A cash de~o it, in the aaount of one hundred
dollars ($100), shall be po ted by the Structure
over with th Chief Building Official prior
to issu nee of any Moving Perai . Said deposit
y b used to repair daaaa s to public prop r y
in th ev nt that th St ruc tur ov r does no
r pair th da•aaes within thirty (30) days
of wr itt n notic by th Chi f Buildina Official.
·.7
• •
,
f ":
. ,
' .;
' ..
......
..
....
' ....
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
•
• -
OE1'aRTMENT OF' COMMUMIT't
DEVELOPMENT
ENGLEWOOO,COLORAOO
JUL 9 1975 .. .. ----·-----
t•
Jim Buptnger, Direct.or of Community Development
Andy McCown, Clty Manager
July 9, 1975
ff()tJSE MOVING AND DDIOLrrtON
OF STRUCTURES ORDINANCE
~ Tbe Ctty Council, at their reauJar meeting on July 7, 19'75, pueed GD
! first ~a bW tbr an ordinance ccmoemlng demolltSCID and ~
'~ '
···•·
. •.
'
• 1 of tltructuree, and ~ set a Public H•l'llll for same on AQIUt 4, HH.
~ ~. There wu aome dl8CWl•ton of SectiDll 3~-T Performance Bondll -OIMr.
'l'9 dl8ouaeton Cf!Dtered around the 111atemmt whlah 19dil: ..
. . .... ,.;.,
'. (
..
..
...
"fte bond, of at leut $5,000, (may be tncreued by the Cbtef
BullcllDg Oftlcial if he detenntnee that a p-eater amount la
nece9•ry to aHure coverage of completion coeta •••• "
~ Council wu concemed that tbla lanpap may be 90lll•bat ~ ·, .~.
aad vape and, tMrefore, open to lllltierpretatlon and bard to mtoroe: ftlr
a9ked that tbla wording be referred badt to tile PlamtBc and Zoalmc
Commldloll for e&nber clarUlmtton. Hapdally, tbb can be dam al
,our next Plannlllg and Zoaing meetlnc ao tbat a recommendation oan be
,fordloomln& back to COW1cil by the time of tbe Publlo R•rtns. V'· ·':
• •
•
cot Jtarl .
t '
. ,
<
· . .,. ...
~ .. ,.
~
17 ·:
•.:Y~~
;
~.'
'i
,,
I
" ..
•
. .
I .. -'.' I
~;."'" t
t-
·• r r
~l
... ,!. j .
i
d t
t
I
..t
t
I
'
• •
'
•
•
.
i\·,jll' ~.· : .; '·.: ,, " '·
,,,. .. 1 '"\ ,
•' .
,. . "
" .
I
I • (C
•
-
...
DRAFT II
DATE: July 15, 1975
BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE "MOVING'' & "WRECKING "
Page 6, 13-8-7
jSuggested Modifications Prepared by J. L. Supinger)
3-8-1 PERFORMANCE BONDS --STRUCTURE MOVER OR OWNER
(a) STRUCTURE MOVER
A Performance and Coapletion Bond, or other
insurance bond, acceptable to the Chief Building
Official, and proof thereon in writing by the
insuring company, shall be posted by tbe Structure
Mover prior to i suance of the Moving Permit.
'Ibe bond, of at least $5,000, shall insure the
necessary cost of raising the structure from tbe
existing foundation, moving the structure to the
new site, placing the structure on the new founda-
tion, as well as the cost of cleaning, filling and
leveling th site froa which the structure was
moved in the City of Englewood, wi thin 48 bours
of the removal. Said bond shall be increased above
the minimum $5,000 if the Chief Bu il ding Official
determine that the anticipated costs, as abo ..
et out, will exceed $5,000. In such caae, a
bond at le t qual to the amount of the anti ci pated
costs shall r quired.
(b) OWNER
'
.·
• •
I
-,
•
•
•
0
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN MANN
BY AUTH0RITY
ORDINANCE NO. j3 , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 12(d)(S), CHAPTER 10,
TITLE V, OF THE E.M.C., BY EXTENDING THE AMOUNT OF
TIME IN WHICH THE CITY MANAGER HAS TO RENDER A WRITTEN
DECISION ON AN EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE TO TEN (10) BUSINESS
DAYS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
That Section 12(d)(S), Chapter 10, entitled
"Grievances" of Title V of the 1969 E.M.C. is hereby
amended to read as follows:
S-10-12 GRIEVANCES
(d) Procedure.
(S) Within ten (10) business days
from receipt of the department head's
deci ion the employee aay appeal the
decision to the City Manager. The
City M nager shall render a written
6 A ~
decision within five-(5 TEN (10) BUSINESS days
fro receipt of employee's grievance.
The employee may within twenty (20)
d ys ppeal the Manager's decision
to the Career Service Co11111ission
whose de rmination thereon shall
be final.
In roduced, r ad in full nd passed on first
re na on the 21 t d y o July, 1 75.
-1 -• •
....... ,
•
•
•
• •
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the
Z4th day of July, 1975.
Read by title and passed on final reading on
the 4th day of August, 1975.
Published by title as Ordinance No.
Series of 19 75, on the 7th day of August, 1975.
MAYOR
ATTEST :
ex off1c10 City Clerk-Treasurer
I, William D. James, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and co•plete
copy of the Ordin nee, pa ed on final reading and
published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of
1975.
ex officio City Clerk·Trea urer
·2·
' '
•
• •
...
• I •
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN MANN
BY AUTHeRITY
ORDINANCE NO. , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANC E AMENDING SECTION 12(d)(S), CHAPTER 10,
TITLE V, OF THE E.M.C., BY EXTENDING THE AMOUNT OF
TIME IN WHICH THE CITY MANAGER HAS TO RENDER A WRITTE
DECISION ON AN EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE TO TE (IO) BUSINESS
DAYS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
That Section 12(d)(S), Chapter 10, entitled
"Grievances" of Title V of the 1969 E.M.C. is hereby
amended to read as follows:
5-10-12 GRIEVANCES
(d) Procedure.
(S) Within ten (10) business days
from receipt of the department head's
decision the employee •ay appeal the
decision to the City Manager . The
City Manager shall render a written
decision within ive -(S TEN (10) BU INESS days
from receip of employee's arievance.
The employee may wi hin twenty (20)
days app al the Manager's decision
to the Career Service Co .. i ion
whose d ter in a ion h r on hall
b final.
ln trodu c d, r ea d i n f ul l n d pa s ed on first
r din on t he 21 t d y o J ul y , 1975.
·l ·
'
• •
,
...... ,
•
• •
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the
24th day of July, 1975.
Read by title and passed on final reading on
the 4th day of August, 1975.
Published by title as Ordinance No.
Series of 1975, on the 7th day of August, 1975.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, William D. James, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of the Ordinance, pa sed on final reading and
published by title a Ordinance No. , Series of
1975.
ex officio Ci ty Clerk-Trea ur r
-2-• •
-,
•
• I•
•
'·
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN MANN
BY AUTH6RITY
ORDINANCE 0. , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1Z(d)(5), CHAP TER 10,
TITLE V, OF THE E.M.C., BY EXTEND! G THE AMOUNT OF
TIME IN WHICH THE CITY MANAGER HAS TO RENDER A WRITTEN
DECISION ON AN EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE TO TE (10) BUSINESS
DAYS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as fo llows:
Section 1.
That Section I2(d)(5), Chapter 10, enti tled
"Grievances" of Titl Y of the 1969 E.M.C. i hereby
amended to read as follows:
5-10-12 GRIEVA CES
(d) Procedure.
(5) Within ten (10) business days
from receipt of the department head's
deci ion the e ploye m y appeal t he
decision o th Ci y Manager. The
City M n ger s all render a wri ten
decision wi hin ive -TE. (10) BUSI ESS days
ro r ce1p o employee's grievance.
The employe may ~i h1n twenty (20)
day appeal the M nager• d cision
o th C reer ervic Co i ion
who d r ina ion thereon h 11
b inal.
l ntro du d, r
ng on h 21 • d y
d tn full nd p 5 5 d on
,July, 19 5.
· l ·
lTSt
'
• •
-,
,
•
• •
'·
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN MANN
BY AUTHGRITY
ORDINANCE 0. , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIO 12 (d)(S), CHAPTER 10,
TITLE V, OF THE E.M.C., BY EXTEND! G THE AMOUNT OF
TIME IN WHICH THE CITY MANAGER HAS TO RE DER A WRITTEN
DECISION ON AN EMPLOYEE GRIEVANCE TO TE (10) BUSI ESS
DAYS.
BE IT ORDAi ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF E GLEWOOD, COLORADO, a fo llows:
Sc.>ction 1.
Tha t S ction 12(d)(S), Chapter 10, entitled
"Grievances" of Tltl V of the 1969 E.M.C . is hereby
amended o read a follows:
S-10-12 GRIE VA CES
(d) Proce dur e.
(S) Wi thin
rom r ceip
d ci ion h
decision
Ci
d
·l ·
n ull nd p
ul ", 1 S.
d on 1r
days
• •
,
......
r
(
•
•
•
• •
..
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the
24th day of July, 1975.
Read by title and passed on final reading on
the 4th day of August, 1975.
Published by title as Ordinance No.
Series of 1975, on the 7th day of August, 1975.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ex officio City Cl rk -Trea~urer
I, William D. J me , do
the abov nd for goin i ru
copy of the Ordin nee, pa sed on
publi h d by title a Ordinanc
1975 .
hereby certify that
, accur te nd co plete
final re din and
o. , S ries of
o f1c10 C1 y Clerk-Tr urer
'
• •
-,
•
•
I•
•
. ·.
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AGREE MENT BETWEE THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THE CITY
OF LITTLETON, COLORADO , A MUN I CIPAL CORPORATION , AND THE
LITTLETON FIRE PROTECTI ON DISTRICT TO ESTABLISH AND CON-
STRUCT A JOINT. FIRE TRAININ G FACILITY; MiB Bli6hHHJli Ati
Ei Pl t!IHiiPl6Y .
WHEREAS, both Englewood and Littleton are Home
Rule citie op rating under Charters pursuan o Article
XX of the Constitution of the State of Colorado; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed by the parties o thi
Agre ement to be in their best interests to establish and
co nstruct a joint fire training facility; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed to so
cons ruct and operate the same on the erms and provi ions
con ined in that certain Agreement und r dat of May 19,
1975; and
WHEREAS, it is the int ntion of the c1 t1es and the
District th t non shall be a customer of the oth rs, but
ather this facility shall be on tructed nd operated
with cons ruction costs, co t of addi ions and costs o
op r ion and mainten nee bein di ided be ween hem in
a fair nd equitable manner as more fully et forth in
the greement t ch d hereto.
'OW, TH ·REFOR ·, IT ORDAi ED BY THF. CITY CO CIL
01' THE CITY OF ·.'GL OD, C LORA 0, a. follo
ect1on l.
• 1 •
1
of
~
• .
'
6 8 /1
, '
• •
•
•
•
•
wr i tt e n instrument captioned "Agreement", which is
as follows:
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ----day of
-------• 1975, by and between the City of Littleton, Colorado,
(hereinafter "Littleton''), a Munlclpal "corporatlon of the State of Colorado;
the City of Englewood, Colorado, (hereinafter "Englewood''), a Municipal
corporation of the State of Colorado; and th Littleton Fire Protection
DI t rlct (hereinafter "District''), a ftre protection district organized
pu r s uant to th laws of the State of Colorado.
WITNE ETH :
WHEREAS, both Littleton and Englewood are Home Rule Cities
operating under Charter pur uant to A rtlcl XX of the Constitution of th
o f Co lo rado ; and
WHE R AS, ll l
ln tb Ir
rued b th part1 s to this Ag ment to
tabll b and co n truct a o lnt fir t in ln
11
'
.·
• •
,
•
•.
0 I•
•
costs of operation and maintenaii~e being divided between them in a fair
and equitable manner as set forth hereinafter with greater specificity; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement is made to further the purposes of
the publtc health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Littleton, Engl9"'00d
and the District. ;.
'
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually covenanted and agreed by and
b tween the parties hereto as follows:
I. FACILrrIE
A. The joint facilities which shall b knO"A-n a th Englewood-Uttleton
Fi Training Center, shall be located on four (4) acr pare l
of land whtch is presentl owned bv Uttl to , said pare
Colora , to-wit:
• •
,
n.
•
0
•
4. l acr , more OP'iess, subject to all easements
and rights-of-way of record and reserving to th
public, u e of an easement for sewer and utiliti s
along the ea t 15 ' th reof.
B. Littleton agrees that ft shall convey an undivided on -half (1 /2)
Interest In the above-described real property to Englewood,
which property is to be held by both municipalftfes for perpetual
use as a training faclllty.
C. Said property shall be under the j oint control of Littleton, Englewood,
and the DfBtrlct and the use shall not be changed without the
consent of all parties to this Agreement. Should th faclltty
cea e to function a a trafnln center for fire pr ventton, th
City Councils of Englewood and Littleton and th Bo rd of th
District hall ther fter b fre to dlspos of th e tructures and
r 1 proper as th hall flt.
rt'hlt c to
d a fir tralnfn Caclllt utlll In of a
r
;.
.·
• •
,
•
•
land donated by Littleton to t.bla project, Upon execution of this
Agreement, Englewood wm deposit $7, 500 in a sp cial account
to be known as District-Englewood-Littleton account at the
Littleton National Bank, and District shall depoaft in t.b e same
account upon the execution of t.bts Agreement, 3, 750. Upon
~e award of a conatructton bid per II D below, EnglewOOd ahaU
deposft $72, 500 in the same a ccount and District hall d po ft
$36,250 in the am e account. Df bursement from aid account
shall be made in accordance w ftb this ,\,greem nt b th
signatures of th Treasurer and City Manag r of Littleton and
an annual audit of this aceou.nt shall be made a Part of Lfttl ton's
annual au dit.
;.
'
c. A ft r the preparatfon of th final plans and spccfffcatfon for
aatd faclUty, and after approval of th am b th Ffr Chief
or Engl ood and Lfttl ton and th Joint Tralntn Facfllty
Commftt , th architect • JI ubmtt aid Plana and
cfff atfon to b fd und r pro c:lJ
• otn pP
D. Th aYlard of th bfd to
ntractor •hall b at r
• Aft r m t •
• •rd 0
In ra ho
of
• • •
•
0 I •
•
for the design and constructton of said facilities shall be
paid for on the foll~fng pro rata basis:
Englewood 50%
Littleton 25%
District 25%
F. If no contract fs awarded pursuant to paragraph D above within
twelve (12) months from the date of tl!is Agr~ement, then the
fun.de rernafnfng fn the account established under paragraph
ll-B above wUJ be retumed on a pro rat.a basis to Dfetrfct
and EnglewOOd, after all proper expenses arising from this
Agreement have been paid and the undlvtd d on -half (1/2)
interest in the subject land returned b Engl~OOd to Little-
ton, and this Agreement shall then b t rmfnated and of no
further fore or e ffect.
O. No other construction other than as a t forth abov hall b
allow don th above-cfeacrtbed property without th ofnt
authorization of Dfatrtct, ngl ood a.nd LI ti ton.
m. OPERATION OF FACILITY
A. A J>ennan t oom.mftt to b Jeno a th Joint Trafnln a Utt
Conunftt (h fnaft r ''Commltt ·~. hall b
tabll h
II
a ntm n •hall
;.
• •
•
. , 0 I•
•
date of this Agreement and written notice of said appointments
•'·
shall be given to District, Engle wood and Littleton.
B. The purpose of the Committee shall be to provide administrative
direction for all operations of th joint training facutty
and attendant matters, both during the course of con truction ,.
and after the faclltty 18 in operation.
C. Decisions of the Committee shall be mad by a majority vote.
In th event that a majority vote cannot be arrlv d at on
any matters within the scope of their authority, th and in
that event, a fifth memb r of th Committe hall b appointed
for the purpos of reaching ad rmlnatton of that is u •
Th (lfth member ball be an individual 'A<ho c id tit i agreed
upon by the Di trtct, Englewood and Little n, or in th ab c
of nt, th filth m mb r hall appoint b th
Colorado, and a flfth mt'm r o p v.ho
• All 11 r~ t th•
• •
0 C mt for a
.; ..
-
•
•
·, •
(30) days by said appointing authority with notice of said new
appointment being gften a s required above.
E. The Committee may adopt such rules of procedure that the deem
advisable.
F. The Committee shall establish all necessary rules and regulations
concerning the operation and use of said training facility.
G. The C<1n1mittee shall establish a r ntal schedule for use of the
training facility by outside parties.
H. The Committee on or before August 1st of each year shall prepare
and submit a budget for the operation and maintenance of th e Train-
ing Facillty for the following year to District, E~lewood. and Littleton.
Upon th approval of said budget b District, Englewood, and
Littleton, an amount totaling the f\111 amount of said budget
shall be deposited in the account established under II-B above
on th following pro rata ba i , on or b for January 15th of
th following r to-wit :
Pa n s from aid ac oun hall b mad bv th tur of
Tr M na
• u
•
;.
'
.·
• •
,
•
0
•
I. Any supplemental appn>J?.~'9-tion to the approved budget, or any
amount required for the first year of operation of th tmining
facility. shall be jointly approved and paid in accordance with
paragraph F above.
J. Normal operation and maintenance costs shall includ those
utility costs incidental to the operation of aid facility. ;.
together with that insurance necessary to adequately cover '
said facllity.
:
IV. USE OF FACILITIES
A. The wie of the tratning facilltles aball be limited to Littleton • . Englewood and the Dlatrict and ahall, at the pl asu of the
Committee, b available for oth r recognized bona fld Fire
Departm n , law enforcem nt cl s. re cu doth r mer-
uni oth r a ncf s shall b
at a ra termineci b and pro l for in
ffi-F ov 0 ad faclllti
hall b un r Il-B abov
nd er to th partt to thl A f llo
• •
•
• l•
•
B. Should the training facUUy be damaged or destroyed while used
by any party to this Agreement or other renting agency and as
a result of said use, it shall b th r ponsibility of that agency
to pay for any and all dama don to these facilities should
said damage not be covered by an insuranc ,
C. No party to this Agreement shall a ign an righ h r und r ;.
without the consent of the other parti All of th term ..
and provisions hereof hall be bindin upon and inure to
the benefit of the p rtl h to, th Ir ucc or and
assigns.
V. TERMINATION
• This Agreement may onl be terminated upon th joint approval
or District, Engl wood and Littleton.
EXEC TED th ___ day of--------· 1975.
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
B -------------~
ATTEST·
Jam L. Taylor, Pr l nt
F:n I ood Cl Council
City Cler
CITY OF LITTL TO
l
• •
-1 0 ·
•
-
•
•
0 I •
•
LITTLE TON FffiE PROTECTION DISTR IC T
ATTEST:
By~~~~~~~:-:--:--~~~~
P aul Wo lf, President
Varian Ashbaugh, Secretary
Se c tion 2.
The
exe ute same
and the City
the Seal o
e tion 3.
on th
Mayor is hereby au hor1zed
for and on behalf of the Ci
Cler is direc ed to a e
he Ci y hereto.
d 'n full nd pa
• 19"'5.
Publl h d
• 19 s.
a Bill for an Ord1n n
• 11 •
on
r di
.. ,
•.
;
'
• •
-•
0
•
ATTEST:
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, William D. James, do hereby certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy
of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and
passed on first reading on the 4th day of August, 1975.
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
• l .
•.
• •
{
(
•
•
•
1 TRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN ~~~~~~~~~~~~-
A BILL FOR
A ORDINANCE APPROVI G AN AGREEMENT BETWEE THE CITY OF
E GLEWOOD, COLORADO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THE CITY
OF LITTLETON, COLORADO, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND THE
LITTLETON FIRE PROTECTIO DISTRICT TO ESTABLISH AND CON-
STRUCT A JOINT.FIRE TRAl ING FACILITY; A 'D DECLARING AN
EMERGENCY.
WHEREAS, both Englewood and Littleton are Home
Rul e cities op rating under Charter s pursuan to Article
XX of the Constitution of the State of Colorado; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed by the part1ec to this
Agreement to be in their best inter s s to establish and
construe a joint fir training facil1 y; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have agreed o o
construc t and operate the ame on he er s nd provisions
con ained in t hat cer ain ree en under da e o May 19,
19 5; and
OF TH ·
S c t 1un
·l·
BY HF. CIT COU CIL
o lo s :
1
of
r
• •
-
(
•
•
0
•
written instrument captioned "Agreement", which is
as follows:
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this --"'----day of
-------J 1975, by and between the City of Littleton, Colorado,
(hereinafter "Littleton''), a Munictpal'corporatton of the State of Colorado;
the Ctty of Englewood, Colorado, (hereinafter "Englewood''), a Municipal
corporation of the State of Colorado; and the Littleton Fire Protection
District (hereinafter "Dtstrlct''), a fire protection di.St rt ct organized
pursuant to the law• of the State of Colorado.
WITNESS ETH:
WHE REAS, both Littleton and Enclewood are Home Rule Cltles
operatln under Charters pur uant to A rticl XX of the Conatituttoo of th
ta of Colorado; and
HE REAS, lt ls de med b th parti mm tob
n •h Ir Int rest to e tabllab and conatnict a 10 nt flr l lnln
acl'I rd
=--·
• th part! c truct and
rma d pro la t forth; aod
, It U1 th int Dt tr t that
n m r of th oth re, bu rath l1l hall
c "" ed op rated wt tl'llCU D C tt, c of addition , ud
-2 ·
•
:
• •
(
•
•
0 I•
•
costs of operation and m aintenali~e being divided between them in a fair
and equitable manner as set forth hereinafter with greater specificity; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement le made to further the purposes of
the publlc health, safety and we lfare of the citizens of Littleton, Englewood
and the District.
NOW, THE REFORE, lt ls mutually covena nted and agreed by and
between the parties hereto as follow s:
I. FAC ILITIES
A. Th joint facilltles which shall b known as the Englewood-Littleton
Fire Training Center, shall b located on a four (4) acre pare
of land which le pre ly owned by Littleton, said p reel
ltua 1n the City of ood, Coun or Arapaho , , te of
Colorado, to-wit:
;.
• •
,
-
(
•
•
0 -
4. 1 acres , more or-.tess , subje ct to a ll easements
and rights-of-way of record and r eserving to the
p ublic , use o f an easem e nt fo r sewer and utilities
along the east 15 ' the r eo f .
B. Littleton agrees that it shall convey an undivided one-half (1 /2)
Interest in the above-described real property to Englewood,
which prope rty is to be held by both municipalities for perpetual
use as a training facility.
C. Said property shall b e under the joint control of Littleton, Englewood ,
and the District and the use s hall no t be changed without th e
consent of all parties to this Agre ement. Sho uld th fa c ill
cease to function a s a trainin cent r for fi r e pr vention , th
City Counc ils o f E nglewood and Ltttl ton and th Board of th
Di t rlc t shall thereaft er f re to di po of th ructu and
r al p rope rty a s they s hall m.
n. CO •• TIU CTION OF IMPROVEM E T
A. Th pu1 h r to hall mu
a fir trainin fa cUtt. u Urin h a fa
r
aid faclli to
p nd con ructl n of
120,000.
ood'• ha 11
0,000
0,
r
:
• •
•
0
•
( land donated by Littleton to this project. Upon execution of this
Agre ment, Englewood will deposit $7, 500 in a special account
to be known as District-Englewood-Littleton account at the
Littleton National Bank, and District shall deposit in the sam
account upon the execution of this Agreement, $3, 750. Upon
~e award of a construction bld p er II D below, Englewood shall ;.
deposit $72, 500 in the same account and District shall deposit '
$36,250 in the same account. Disbursements from said account
shall be made in accordance with this Agreement by th :
signatures of the Treasur rand City Manager of Littleton and
an annual audit of this account shall be mad a part of Litt! ton's
annual audit.
C. Aft r the pr paratl n of the final plans and peclffcatton for
ald facility, and after appro.;al of the am b th Ffr f"ht C
of Engl ood and Llttl ton and th Joint Trainln F cllltv
Comm! e archit t s JI ubmlt aid pl
bl p
in ppro
• A
ln
•S· • •
,
(
•
0 I• -
for the design and construction of said facilities shall be
paid for on the foll~lng pro rata basis :
Englewood 50 %
Littleton 25 ~
District 25 <.{
F. If no contract ls awarded pursuant to paragraph D above within
twelve (12) months from th e date of this Agreement, then the
fun.ds remaining in the account established under paragraph
11-B above will be returned on a pro rata basis to District
and Englewood, after all proper expenses arising from thta
Agreement have been paid and the undivided one-half (1/2)
Interest in the subject land returned by Englewood to Little-
ton, and this Agreement shall then be terminated and of no
further force or effect.
G. No oth r construction other than as s t forth above hall b
allowed on th abo · -d scribed propert without th joint
authorlia Ion of Dt trlct, Englewood a nd Lt ti ton.
kno 'ti a th Join t Traln FactU
ommltt ·~, hall
0 (2)
m.
(J )
• in ll
•.
;.
.·
• •
,
•
• .
•
(
date of this Agreement and written notice of said appa1ntment8 ..
shall be given to Di tric • Enirlewood and Litt! ton.
B. The purpose of th Comm! hall provtd administrative
direction for all operation of th oint ralnln facill
and attendant matter , th during th cou e of construction ;.
and after the factltty ts tn operation.
C. Decisions of the Committee shall be made by a majority vote.
In th event that a majority vote cannot be arrived at on
any matters within the cope of their authority, then, and 1n
that event, a fifth member of the Committee hall be ap 1nted
for th purpos of r aching a det rmin tton of that I su •
The filth memb r hall be an tndlvldual "hose ldentlt a re
upan by th Di trtct, En lewood and Little n, or tn th abs c
of uch a re m , th fifth m ml> r shall b appoint • th
on aid mmS n h II b
• •
-
-
(
•
•
•
0
•
(30) days by said appointing authority with notice of said new
appointment being gt'~en as required above.
E. The Committee may adopt such rules of procedure U1at they deem
advt able.
F. T he Committee shall establish all necessary rules and regulations
concerning the operation and u e of said training facility.
G. The C<nn mittee shall establish a rental schedul for use of the
training facility by outside parties .
ff. Tbe Committee on or before Augu t 1 t of each year shall prepare
and submit a budget for the operation and maintenance of the Train-
ing Facility for the following year to District, E~lew OO<f. and Littleton.
Upon the approval of said budg t b District, Englewood, and
Llttl ton, an amount totaling th full amount of aald bu t
shall be deposited in th count e tabl h under II-B abov
on th follO"Ning pro rata ba l , n or b for J ua 15th of
th !ollov. rtc> I :
d
11 b mad b\ h lgnatur of
JI m n
II
;.
'
• •
• -
0
•
(
I. Arzy supplemental appro~~~tion to th e approved budget, or any
amount required for the first year of operation of the t m ining
facility, shall be jointly approved and paid in accordance with
paragraph F above.
J. Normal operation and maintenance co ts shall include thos
ut1111)' costs incidental to the operation of said faclllty,
together with that insurance neces ary to adequately cov r
said facility.
IV. USE OF FACILITIES
A. 1!le UH of the trainin facillti • ahall b lll'nlted to Littleton, .
Eqlewood and th Diatrlct and •hall, at th pl asu of the
Commt , b availabl for olh r r lzed bona fide Fi
r a net hall
for in
m-F Tho r nta11 r o aid Cacil tt
u tted tn th und r -8 abo ·
nd e r to th partt to foll
•
•
;.
:
' ' ·-
• •
-
(
•
• •
B . Sh ould the training faciU.ty be damaged or destro ed while used
by any party to this Agreement or other renting agency and a
a result of said use, it shall b the responsibility of that agencv
to pay for any and all damages don to these facilities should
aid damage not b covered by a~ insurance,
C. No par to thi Agreement s hall assign any rights hereunder
without the consen t of the other partte • All of the terms
and provisions hereof shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of the partle hereto, th ir ucce sor and
a signs.
V. TERMINATION
This Agr men may onl be termin t d upan th oint ap roul
oC Di trlct, Englewood and Littleton.
EXE TED this ___ day of--------• 1 75.
CITY OF E GL \\ D
ATT. T ·
CITY F LrrTL TO
·10·
•.
;.
'
• •
-
-
ATTEST:
•
• •
LITTLETON FffiE PROTECTION D TRICT
By~~~~-:--...~-:-:-""""."~~~~
Paul WoU, Presid nt
Varian Ashbaugh, Secretary
Section Z.
Th
execute sa e
and the City
the Seal of
ct1on 3.
Mayor i
for and
Clerk i
he City
Inas uch
111
on the 4th i
d of
hereby uthorL.
on behalf of the
directed to a t
hereto.
d nd directed t o
Cit y of n 1 ~ood
t sam and af i x
d on fir t r dir
or n rdin nc on h 7 h
11 ·
nt
•.
,
..
• •
•
I
...... •
• •
ATTEST :
ex officio City Clerk-Trea urer
I, William D. James, do here y certify that the
above and foregoing is a true, accura e and complete copy
of a Bill for an Ordinance, introdu c ed, read in full, and
passed on firs t reading on the 4th day of August, 1975.
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
·lZ ·
• .
'
• •
(
(
•
• t•
•
RESOLUTION NO. 3~ , SERIES OF 1975
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLOSING 0 LABOR DAY OF SOUTH
BROADWAY FROM FLOYD TO GIRARD FOR PURPOSES OF A STREET DANCE.
WHEREAS, the Eagles Club of Englewood i desirous
of holding a street dance from 7:00 P.H. to 12:00 P.M. on Labor Day, Septem ber 1, 1975; and
WHE REAS , the Eagles Club i desirous of holding
aid dance on South Broadway from Floyd to Girard.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF E GLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
That South Broadway from Floyd to Girard shall be
closed on Labor Day, September 1, 19 5 fro :00 P.M. to
12:00 P.~. for the purposes of a s reet dance to be held by Englewood Eagles Club.
ATTEST:
" 0
ADOPTED AND APPROVED thi 4th day of Augu t, 1975.
MAYOR
I, 1lli • D .. Jaaes, ex of cio
City of Enal ood, Colorado, do h
..
• •
• .......
•
·, •
(
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of Re s olution No. , Series of 1975.
ex off1c10 City Clerk -Treasurer
-2 -• •
-
(
•
• •
RESOLUTION NO. ___ , SERIES OF 1975
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLOSING ON LABOR DAY OF SOUTH
BROADWAY FROM FLOYD TO GIRARD FOR PURPOSES OF A STREET DA NCE.
WHEREA S , the Eagles Club of Englewood is desirous
of holding a street dance from 7:00 P.M. to 12:00 P.M. on Labor Day, September 1, 1975; and
WHEREAS, the Eagles Club is desirous of holding
said dance on South Broadway from Floyd to Girard.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
That South Broadway from Floyd to Girard shall be
closed on Labor Day, September 1, 1975 from 7:00 P.M . to
1 2:00 P.M. for the purposes of a street dance to be held by Englewood Eagles Club.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 4th day of August, 1975.
ATTE T:
0 t
lClO l y
I,
C1ty
MAYOR
, ex o ficio City Cl r ·Tr a ur r
Color do, do her by cer ti y hat
·l·
• •
,
-
!,
•
• c ~ •
' n
~oa of Jaoldiq
Girad.
P 1111 CITY OF
sllall be
M. to
held
. '
-
-
•
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. ___ , SERIES OF 1975
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLOSING ON LABOR DAY OF SOUTH
BROADWAY FROM FLOYD TO GIRARD FOR PURPOSES OF A STREET
DANCE.
WHEREA S , the Eagles Club of Englewood is desirous
of holding a street dance from 7:00 P.M. to 12:00 P.M. on
Labor Day, September 1, 1975; and
WHEREAS, the Eagles Club is desirous of holding
said dance on South Broadway fro m Floyd to Girard.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Sect ion 1.
That South Broadway from Floyd to Girard shall be
cl o sed on Labor Day, September 1, 1975 from 7:00 P.M . to
1 2:00 P.M. for the purposes of a street dance to be held
by Englewood Eagles Club.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 4th day of August, 1975.
MAYOR
ATT T:
e o
I, "illi m D .. J m , ex o fficio City Cl r ·Tr ur r
o Ci y of nat ood , Co l or do , doh r by c r ify a
-1-
'
• •
......
0
•
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of Resolution No. , Series of 1975.
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
'
•
-2-• • •
,
-
(
•
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. ___ , SERIES OF 1975
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CLOSING ON LABOR DAY OF SOUTH
BROADWAY FROM FLOYD TO GIRARD FOR PURPOSES OF A STREET DANCE.
WHEREAS, the Eagles Club of Englewood is de si rous
of holding a street dance from 7:00 P.M. to 12:0 0 P.M. on
Labor Day, September 1, 1975 ; and
WHEREAS, the Eagles Club is desirous of holding
said danc e on South Broadway from Floyd to Girard .
BE IT RESOL VED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Sec tion 1.
That South Broadwa y from
closed on Labor Day, epte ber 1,
12 :00 P.M. for th e purposes of a
by Englewood Eagle Club.
ADOPTED AND APPROV D th1
ATT T:
ex o
Floyd to Girard sh 11 be
1975 from 7:00 P .. to
treet dance o be held
4th d y of August, 1975.
o •• J ' x 0 0
ood , Co l or do , h
• •
• -•
0 -
-
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete
copy of Resolution No. , Series of 1975.
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
'
•
• 2 -
• • •
,
•
•
•
•
0
•
RESOLUTION NO. ~ SERIES OF 1975
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS IN THE REVENUE SHARING AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
FUND.
WHEREAS, the City Counci I has approved a si~ quarter budget
spanning the time period July, 1975, through December, 1976.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORAOO, as fol lows:
Section 1.
The following estimated revenues and appropriations are hereby
authorized In the Revenue Sharing Fund
S ctlon 2.
Revenues
Revenue Sha r in g
Interest Income
Fund Balance
Total
Appropr iation
Storm Ora I nage
s 12,285
15,000
17 ,830
s 45, 115
s 45,115
The fol towing estimated revenues nd appropriations are h reby
authorized In the Public lmprov t Fund.
Fed rel Gr ant -River De lo
Sales T -deer
R Sharing
f ence
To el nu s
nt S 628,000
( 160,000)
45,115
61, 757
s 574, 72
•.
• •
Section 3.
Appropriations
River Development
Zuni Street
Land Acquisition -Little Dry
Creek
Greenhouse
Interchange Park
Storm Drainage -General
Northwest Greenbelt
Romans Park
Space ut; I lzatlon Study
Sidewalk District
Housing
Fire Training Facility
Total Appropriations
•
• •
\,
$ 628 ,000
{50,000)
{67 ,845)
35,000
15,000
5,000
{8,000)
8,000
<2,000)
{3 ,283)
35 ,000
(20 ,000)
s 574 ,872
The Ci ty Manager and the Di rector of Finance are hereby
authorized to adjust the 1975 Budget of the City of Englewood as
i temized In this Resolut ion.
ADOPT ED AND APPROV ED th is 2 1st dey of Ju l y, 197 5.
Mayor
ATIEST:
ex of f icio City Clerk-Tr surer
':· 't
\1, I
I
I .
I, WI 11 le 0. J ... , e
Ci t y of Engle , Colorado , do h
going Is a tru , ccuret• en d c
officio City Clerk-Tr s urer o f the
reby c rtlfy that h bov• en d f ore-
1• copy of t Resolution • ~
S rt e of 1975 .
'
• •
-
•
•
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
•
• •
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of City Council
Bernard V. Berardini
City Attorney
July 31, 1975
LEVEL OF STREET GRADES -PAVI G DISTRICT
NO. 22
At he regular Council Meeting of July 21, 19 S, the City
Council requested this office to research the problem
of the level of street grades on West Vassar Avenue as
a result of a vertical cut for that particular street,
which lowered the grade level of that stree approximatel y
thr e (3) feet below he existing drives of several homes
abu ing the stree on the nor h.
The .os recent case decided by our St upreme Cour ,
which rela es to this subject matter, is Gidly vs. The
City of Colora o prings (1966) 160 Colo. 482, 448 PZd. 291.
In ha case the Supreme Cour reaffir ed he rule that
fi ing h level of a s reet grade is a legi lative function
and ca nno be delegated by the Ci o a Ci y official. In
the in n c e in P ving Di s rict . o. 22, i is clear ha
the Ci y Council did approve he rade of he City En ineer
by Ordinance . o. , erie of 19 , hi ch adop ed the pl ns
and pecifications, repor s, p and ·h dule att ched
to them rial pre ented o Council, which c reat ed th
Dis ric .
• •
.......
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of City Council
July 31, 1975
Page Two
•
0
•
In City of Denver vs. Bayer, 7 Colo. 113, 2 P. 6, the
Supreme Court held that consequential damages might be held
to be a loss, which does not give rise to an action for
damages against the per so n causing it when occasioned by
a reasonable improvement of a street by the proper authority.
In The Cit of Duran o vs. Luttrell, 18 Colo. 123, 31 P. 853,
the up r eme ourt in erentia ly in icated that no liability
for co n sequential damages to an abutting lot own er r esulted
from a reasonab l e improvement of the street by t h e authority
of the City.
In The Cit~ of Pueblo vs. Strait, 20 Colo. 13, 36 P. 789,
27 L.R.A.92, it was h eld that an abutting property owner
cannot recover for injuries resulting from reasonable or
ordinary, or usual changes and improvements of a street by
the municipalit y .
Accordingly, then, it appears that the weigh of Court
authority , and decision in Colorado, cle arly establishes
th rule that if no street gr ade had been officially
made by the le gislative body of a municipality, and
the grade once established by he legi lative body ppears
to be reasonable and p roperl y made, no liability for damages
en ue to the municipality.
tha on e the lev 1 of a treet
esta lished y th legisla ive body,
that gr de level, if i resul
h n he municip lit lll
'
• •
I
-
<•
•
•
The Honorable Mayor and
Members of City Counci l
July 31, 19 75
Page Three
•
• •
This office is aware that City Council has instructed that
the office of the Director of Public Work s , City Engineer,
make whatever corrections are neces s ary in order that the
property owners may gain access to the property, including
the cutting of the new drive and removal of certain con-
crete driveways, as may be necessary to allow the property
owners to gain access to the property from the street level .
It appear s that such action is reasonable under the circum -
stance s , but that any further expenditure on the part of the
City would be unwarranted.
·~rtfull: s ubmi~ ~t;;)--_R__ ---
City Attorney
BVB/a
• •
•
•
•
•
TO:
FROM:
VATE:
•
0 I•
•
MEIJ{)OOJVUM
Ka.ltl Nolte.nbe..1tgvr., A.61>.U.tant CUy Mtlltage.JL
Acting Ch.le.6 Mo.ltgM, Police. Ve.palttme.n.t
Ju.l.Jj 30, 1975
b \).
SUBJECT: STREET CLOSURE -LABOR VAY JU 31 975
The. ma.t.te.JL 06 clo4btg 066 BJtead41ay a.t Floyd Md GVuvi.d 6Jtem 7:00 P.M .
.t.o mldn.<.gh.t. on LabOJt ·vay 6011. a 4.tlte.e..t. dance. ha6 be.e.n 11.e.v.lewe.d.
l can 6011.U e.e. no 11.e.al pJteblem with tJW. pl.an , no.It do l llll.Uc(.pa.te. the.
ne.e.d 60.1t caUi.ng bt MIJ 066-du,t,y peMonne.l to hMdle the. a66a.llt.
Baltlt.lc.ade.4 will be. pJtev.lde.d by .t.he. st.lte.e..t. Ve.palttme.n.t, Md we. 4 houl.d be.
able. .t.o pltO v.lde. e.nough a.uxil..la.Jttj peM onne1 to hMdle MIJ pJteble.1116 tha.t
might all.i.6e.. In addli.Wn, we. w.dl have. .two 11.e.gul..a.lt 066.lce.Jl.6 on pa.tltol
.ln the. a11.e.a.
~ ..... r ~ ,7,?7~7 ";;1 -i---roc£ L. ~'1gan
Acting Clue. o Po.Uce.
RLM /e.z
cc: capt .
..
• •
-
-
•
•
•
•
INT&OflllCI
MIUDUNDUM
Andy Mccown, City Manager
r.OMs Kells Waggoner
IUlllCTt CLOSING OF BROADWAY
DATI: July 30, 1975
At the staff meeting this morning, there was discussion
6
as to a propQsed Agenda item with reference to closing
Broadway from Floyd to Girard on Labor Day, September 1, 1975
during the hours of 7:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight for a street
dance. At this time, I would lik e to relate to you the
routing and the operational aspects of closing Broadway.
We would expect to install a portable "Street Closed
Ahead" sign at least one block ahead of the subject
area, and if one were traveling the street, he would
then see "Merge Right" signs in order to move the traffic
to the extreme right-hand lane. As he approached the
area of closure, he would see a detour with a right-
hand arrow, wou ld proceed one block and see a detour
sign with a left-hand arrow, proceed one block and
see another detour sign with a lef -hand arrow; would
proceed one block and return to Broadway, where he could
proceed on his previous route.
This route would, in effect, use Floyd and Girard aa
detours east and west, and Lincoln and Acoma as detours
nor h and south. In order to allow for free movem n
of raff1c t he four inters ctions way from Broadw y,
we would hav o in tall at ast two or three additional
s op igns a thos in rs c ion
rou ng,
'
• •
-
• Andy Mccown, City Manager
July 30, 1975
Page 2
•
•
also require a street sweeper and operator, at time-and-
one-half for approximately three hours, to clean up after
the dance.
For several years in the past, we had closed Broadway in this
vicinity so that the downtown merchants could bring in a car-
nival in the hope of attracting more business. This procedure
was discontinued, however, and the carnival moved to an off-
Broadway location because of the inconvenience to the travel-
ing public.
Sincerely,
~.~----~-
Director of Public Works
KW/ls
'
• •
-
~ICT1
•
•
•
0
•
INlll.OfPICI
MIUOIANDUM
Andy Mccown, City Manager
Kells Waggoner
HAZARDOUS SIDEWALKS
DATI: July 30, 1975
As per your memo of June 17 , 1975, we have attempted to
survey the ~welve property owners as previously listed
in an attachment requesting Counci l order for installa-
tion of sidewalks. The results of t he survey indicate
the following:
Two have the work completed. (3 & 12)
Two have indicated that they will have the work
done. (2 & 7)
Two have indicated that they are unable to do the
work themselves and that they are on limited
incomes. (6 & 11)
Two have indicated that they would rather have it
done under a district arrangemen~ (1 & 10)
One had JUS purchased the house and indicated that
the walk was supposed to have been fixed. (9)
One indicated that she had contacted a contractor
and " veryone is too busy at the present". (8)
Two d no reply. (4 & 5)
OTE:
to my
The numbers in parenth sis refer to the list att ch d
mo o June 12, 1975.
It would ppe r from the result of th survey, h w
will have ei9h location still requiring c ion, and
eight, four have ind1ca ed h rdsh1p. Of those
, 6, 10 ' 11) wo r stima d to be fairly hiqh
c all• ions and f irly low .
lly talk d Wlth V
w h d erron oualy
alr dy com le d
Her i.ndic tion w •
7 c
• •
-
(
f"
•
Andy Mccown, City Manager
July 30, 1975
Page 2
•
•
time paying for the sidewalk, and incidentally, hers was
estimated to be the most costly; but that she had managed
to pay for it.
The one main advantage for the hardship cases, in wa iting
for a sidewalk district, would be that they could spread
the cost of the installation over a ten-year period rather
than paying for it all at once; and to me, it would appear
that if we decide to wait for a sidewalk district, and in
that these are fairly extreme cases of displacement, we must
realize that the City could have some liability in the event
of an accident.
Sincerely,
~{~
Kells Waggoner~
Director of Public Works
KW/ls
Attachs.: copies of postcard replies (7)
• .
• •
7.
l
to
• •
IJDIWALK BEC AUSE I /WL 1
o the wo r k •y/ou ra elv ••
or dlaabillt y.EJ
A9•(a)t ~:t_...1.._~~
a ll•lt•d inco••·lill
Annual lnco••1 4'106
anyone livln9 w ith u a wh o
boa we cou ld aak
i n 9etting the
applies
lour •l•n•t ura(•)s
•
•
I •,
Dir
l.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
.,. T REPAIR THE SIDEWALK BECAUSE I/WE:
Are unable to do the work my/ourselves
because of age or disability.IZJ o
AgeJI): /p7
Are on a limited income.~ ;[ol11'i J.-; L
Annual income: S".FC'<-r/ T
Do not have anyone.Jiving with us who
could do the work.18 1
Do not know any2Qe whom we could ask
to do the work.W
Just are not .i,ptere sted in getting the
repairs done.~
Have other liens against the property
I
e \
i
I
requiring mo~thly p~ents.[!J~ IJ
Other: .. ~~~~ ~ cb ,C &4 w . 1'-2~
Your signature~s): rz/J.,L,,7f~
r I •
~
I
J
\
• •
01 , MOT JlF..PAlR T HE S I DB WALK BECAlSE I/WE:
1, Are u ..,le t o d o the work 2y,ourselves
a9e o r di1ability • .:J
A9e (I) I
Are on a lia i ted incoae.Q
Annua l incoae1
l. Do not have anyone living with us who
could do the work.Q
•· Do not know anyone whoa we could ask
to do the vork. 0
Just are not ~nterested in 9ettin9 the
repair• done.Q
Rave other liens against the property
requirin9 aonthly payaents .Q
Other 1
Please place an X in each box that applie1
to your situation,
Your ai9nature (1)1
-'.
'P -Y/~/
•
•
I
I
1: I
.,
lj
DID NOT REPAIR THE SIDEWALK BECAUSE I/WE:
l .tl\re unable to do the work my/ourselves
because of age or disability.[].
Ageg): · ·
2 . Are on a limited income.
Annual income:
3. Do not have anyone living with-us who
could do the work .(]
4 . Do not know anyone whom we could ask
• to do the work.t:)
5 , Just are not interested in getting the
6: repairs done.Q
Have other liens against the property
requiring monthly payments.tJ
7, Other: '
Please place an X in each box that applies
to your situation.
Your signat,ure ( s):
7-:i~Js
c4~ul'W!.IL I/.~~· e "'> .. -~'7lt
~ 4-W-_t,..... . . ;._.4 ~
'
•
•'
._/~.....;/ ;z7~ MJ ~~u -(~1. . .
els '~i
l ________ --··-.. -.
r I 0 •
#
\
D
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
1.
L • • JJ
THE SIDEWALK BECAUSE I/WE:
to do the work :ny/ou r :sclves
a~e or disability .
'g I J
Are on a limited income .
Annual income ·:
Do not have anyone l):ving witn us who
could do the work.
Do not know any~~e whom we could ask
to do the work.
ust are not intereated in getting the
repairs done.O
Have other liens against th!.J>roperty
requiring conthly payments .29_
Other: -..;" (""r.~....._~-3~~=-~--~__,;:v,...,...~-,-"="'e~.~~~~--
Please place an X in each box that applies
to ycur situation .
Your slanature(s):
tve. .a.A..< ~ ~ c-..f Jf:'u...-r;
....---:~ • e""-l f' ~ ~ ~ o.-t_......;:i
.,.__. v' ,__J._ • J 1-f,,~ q ~
' I/, f ~ t.U-€_ ~ f~
~ -.A -~'---.... , -c-l....-a-.-?
~,.(J<~S~
vt~ a.....-') ~ -r; 1...-.-...-.
1'-<-) • "' € _;,,u
~u-
~·
'J ••I • L/P•• vC.
?fg-t..71
•
DID NOT REPAIR THE SID~ALK BECAUSE. I/WE:
l. tli':e unable to do t e work my/ourselves
because of age or isability.[J
Age (s):
2. Are on a iimited i come.[]
Annual income:
J. Do not have anvone ivi~ with us who
4. Do not know any
to do the work.
s.
6.
7.
Please place an X in
to your situation.
Your signature(s):
could ask
getting the
that applies
'11
"
•
• 2 -... \ 7-1 '3-7.5 • ~-..._..._: -Li-t--'-~ 1 <r-'..V'-
A>~ ~'..__71\~, j.~~
~_b.SL .... -L -<....1.....t ~~-1...A..-."Ju.-... ._ . _-/ a r ~ ~6 ~ JLJ)--+ JJ -u..:, ~ a· , .., ";.J,.~1--
-;=J~ ~ ~ ~ ~.A/ ;..,c_/ .. ~
~~~---·~:c~
(>...-WO• ......... ii.--~--.'.....+ ~.6.£·~
_ "',_ c r ~ 7 ~~ ~ -.. -.{~ £1.-.> ..A ..:.,,~~ , d
<JJ I <.J'-
71~-~I
~()~~)
37<t /S,(L~
I 0 •
:;-
~
•
"
D
1.
J.
4.
s .
1.
OT • AIR THE SIDEWALK BECAUSE I/WE:
Are uuable to do the work ay/~raelves
because of aqe or disability .LJ
Aqe .i,!) :
Are on • liaited incoae .LJ
Annual income:
Do not have anyone living with us who
could do the work.CJ
Do not know anyone whoa we could ask
to do the wort.al
Just are not lntereated in 9ettin9 the
repairs done.O
••• other liens a9ainat the property
requirin9 iJontbly payaents. [J
Other; AJD r,..,,,~,.f4j ;') /~
Your ai9nature(a):
. . .
•
~
•
I •
;;
\
•
-
L
TO: Andy Mccown, Citg Manager
FROM: Karl Nollenberger, Assistant City Manager
DATE: July 31, 1975
SUBJECT: Dog Conmittee
The Dog Coamittee of the Citg of Englewood consisting of mgself, Bob Horgan,
Acting Chief of Police, Jim Supinger, Director of Co11111Unitg Development,
E. P. Romans, Director of Parks and Recreation and George Lee, Assistant
City Attorneg have met and deliberated on the current animal control
problem in the Citg. After a review of the problem, four major areas
of concern can be identified.
1. Education of the public.
2. Enforcement progr-s.
3. Judicial enforceeent.
4. The ordinance governing animal control.
A public education progr-is an important part of ang aniaal control
program. In order to further this prograa, -./wive initiated an article
for August's issu of the Englewood Citizen new•letter. Thi• article
will discuss the problem in detail in hope• of getting voluntary co
pliance on the part of our citizens. Ninety per cent of the probl-is
public awarene•s and self-regulation. In addition, we strongly rec nd
the continuation of a public education progra111 on a dailg ba•is. The
development of brochures for distribution at pet •hop , an1 .. 1 pound,
banks, etc. would be helpful. These brochure• can caution people on
pets and help instruct them in their re•pon•ibilitie•. Such brochures
could also be u•ed bg the police public relations officer when vi•its
schools. Potential aid is available frcm the HUJM Soc ety, dog breeder
groups, veterinarian association, product manufactures, etc. to aid in
the develo nt of these brochures. A con•tant conscJou•nes• 1111•t be
11o11ntained.
Enforc nt of the ani .. l ordinances are difficult
revi of the ,..n hour• put into th• OPflration,
t~thirds of the total available man hours could
The r-inder i• t t
hours nd cl
would
0
at be•t. After
found that only about
be utilized in
n1 .. 1 control
t vehiclH
Jn
7 B
• •
-
page 2
Andy HcCown
July 31, 1975
•
0
•
In order to insure the j udicial enforcement of this ordinance, we suggest
that the fee structure for citations be set up in the ordinance. To this
end, we suggest that this provision be $15 for the first offense, $25
for the second offense and $300 for the third offense. In those cases
where education of the public does not work, a real deterrent must be
offered. The money received by these fines can be utilized in the public
education program.
We would recommend a number of changes to the ordinance governing animal
control in the City. First of all, ...., can find no restrictions in our
laws on persons keeping ~kind of animal within the City. For example,
mules, donkeys, horses, burros, cattle, goats, swine, sheep, chickens,
turkeys, etc. are .all currently legal within certain health regulations.
We suggest an alteration to this law. Secondly, we reconnend that the
Council look at a leash law. ffhile the Committee was not in favor of
this law, it does prevent persons from allowing their animals to roam
freely under any conditions. It 1110uld be advantageous to control on
public grounds. The problems involved are great however in the enforce-
ment of this law. Hany well trained animals would also be subject to
the provisions of the law. Such events as dog shows could become
technically illegal. Perhaps the answer is a better description of
what "under control" in the current law entails would be benefici al.
The COlmll.ittee wou ld like to definitely recOllllDf!nd the imposing a paper
bag law. This law would require persons wbo take their dogs on the
morning constitutiona l or for walks in the park to carry a paperbag
(or plastic) and shovel in order to remov the animal's excrement
f rom the public or private propert y. ownership of animals as pets
requires the consideration of other people and sanitary conditions of
our P11rks. The last area is that of vicious dogs. ExtreJaely vicious
dogs should be limited to enclosed areas rather than being allowed
to be staked on a chain. It is .uch too asy to walk around a corn r
o f house i nto the path of a c ha ined vicious dog without warn i ng.
Additionally, posting of vicious and guard dogs should be required.
On the less vicious dog side, dogs who ngage in .haras.-ent of people,
chasing of c ars or bicycles or threatening behavior should be label«!
as i ll egal and subject to citation.
discussed above are label«! as arHs of concern and the
rec ndati ons are tho of the C~itt-. 'l'helJ should not be
considered as sacr«t and other are • of concern not consider«! by the
COllfti t .. Y 11 surface. Your coiuideration is requ sted.
AJ. ..£ \f"
<toll nber r
nt City na r n4 Cha J l'9111 of t
·I•
• •
-
SECTION
11 ·11-1
11 ·11·2
11 -11 -3
ll ·H-4
•
• •
CHAPTER 11 ·
ANIMAL AND FOWL
Article I -Dogs
SUBJECT
Definitions
Rabies Vaccination Required
Dog at Larg Prohibited
Dog at Large ; lmpoundment : otice ; Disposition
Barking Dog a uisance I 1-11 -f>
11 -11 -6 1ain nance of More than Three Dogs on Premises ; License
Requirement
ll ·ll-7 Hobby Breeder's Licen Application : Fees
11-11 I uance : Renewal
11 -11 -9 Hobby Breeder Operauon
11·1 J.10 Right of Entry : In pections
11-11·11 Denial , Revocation or u pen ion of License
ll-11 -12 Viciou Dog ; Guard Dogs
11 -11-13 Poi oning Dog Unlawful
11-1 J.14 Promotion of Fi ht
11-ll·lf> thru
11 ·11 ·20 Reserved
rtlde II -n mat in Gl'neral
IJ.11 ·21
IJ.11 2
11 ·11 ·2
II II· 4
11 ·11·2
11 ·11
11 ·11 %7
Li tock ; Runnan at Lar
bandonm nt of rum I
K>n nt.wful
T I h
•.
• •
,
-
•
I( rd o 1 .
11 11 ·1·
lbl
(Cl
ldl
•
• •
Arti I I -Dog
n l'l721
DEFI ITION
11·11 ·1
othenri . th folio" m
th own and resid nl of land
undary lm .
d ignated b t.h cit. I th
animal impounded und r the
t.her ordinan or la"' of th
of t.h owner and not under
(el "Do ·· -anyarumalofth camn peci ,reprdleseof x .
(fl '"Finance Director" -Dt tor of Finance. ex officio ity lerk ·
Tre11 surer.
tgl "Hobb breed r " -any penon who . out ide of h regular cour of
emplo menL , i breeding dog or tnving to improv do throu h
controlled propagation, thu achieving carefully ired qualllie
and trait .
(hi .. Own r " -hall m nan pe n wning . keeping r har nn a
dog or d g .
Iii
(J,
f I
•
'
• •
,
11·11 ·2
11 -11 -2 :
•
•
RABIES VACCINATION REQUIRED
It shall be unlawful for the owner of any dog to keep or maintain any such
dog unle it shall have been v accinated by a li censed veterinary urgeon with
antirabi vaccine within twelve (12) months preceding the date on which the
dog i kept or maintained. and every dog within the city s hall at all times have a
current rabie tag as provided by t h e Department of Health , or a subdivision of
s u ch department. Any dog, when taken from the owner's premises, must wear a
collar to which a current rabies vaccination tag is affixed. and such tag shall not
be tran ferable to any other dog .
11 -11 -3 : . DOGS AT LARGE PROHIBITED
It shall be unlawful for any person owning, po ing or keeping cu todial or
upervisory authority or control over any dog to perrnit, cau e or suffer uch
animal to run at large within the ci t y , as defined in tion 11·1 l·l.
11 -11 -4 :
(al
DOGS AT LARGE ;
IMPOUNDMENT ; NOTI E ; DI PO ITION
tbl Th Animal Warden may tran f r tit.le of an
(Cl
td l
h lter to th Soci ty for th Pre ent.ion of
th I gal detention period ha expired and
claimed b 1u owner.
the Animal
n
1 I
• .
'
• •
-
•
•
• •
11-11 ·
(el Any animal , other than a dog, found running at large within the city
limits may be impounded or disposed of according to law when such
action is required, either to protect the animal or to protect the
residents of the city . The owner of any animal so impounded may
reclaim such animal upon payment of all co ts and charges incurred
by the city for impounding and maintenance of uch animal.
11 -11 -5 : BARKING DOG A N I ANCE
It 1hall be unlawful for any owner or k per of any dog or dog to perm it uch
dog or dogs by loud and persistent habitual barking, howling or yelping to
diet.rub any person or neighborhood , and the same i hereby declared to be a
public nu1 ance. It shall not be neces ary, for th purpo of th" ub uon , to
id ntify od de cribe the dog or dog which are barkin . howling or elp1ng ,
provided only that it shall be shown who ha po ion , care , cu tod or
control of said dog or dogs.
II 11 -:
II II
fa l
MAINTENANCE OF MORE THAN
THREE DOG ON PREMI E ;
LICENSE REQUIREMENTS
t I
'
• •
-•
• -
L
11 ·11 ·9
(bl Upon issuance of t.heC1ty Hobby Breeder's Licen • the licensee may
carry on a limited breeding program , but may not maintain more
than five (5) dogs over six (61 months of ag.,, nor more than twenty
(20 1 puppies welped and transferred in any twelve·monlh period .
(c l Th Hobby Breeder's License under the provision of this ordinance
shall expire on the 31st day of December each year . .Each license
shall be renewed during the month of December each year. Such
application for renewal shall be mad to I.he Director, in writing, on
fonns prescribed by t.h Director, hall contain uch information es
will enable him to determine if the applicant IS qualified to continue
to hold a Ii en and shall be a companied b a renewal fee of twenty·
five doilars l 25 .)
I 1·11 -9 : HOBBY BREEDER OPERATIO
Operator ' Du tie Every per on hcensed und r I.his ordinance to operate as a
hobby breed r hall .
lal Maintain the prem1 e and faciht1 in a anitary ondition
lb) Provide adequ le venttlallon for th for animal
f I Prov1d adequat nutr1t1on for and human ca and treatm nt of all
dog und r h . care and control.
11 -11 -10 RI HT OF E . TRY ; I
11 11 ·11 DE. I L. RE\<
(bl
10
r a penod
acc:Gr1d&11ce with
1lt of th
U LO
to l
' i
• •
f
•
•
0
•
\.
11 ·11·21
ld I Failure to maintain sanitary conditions and the proper disposal of
animal waste as may be required by the Colorado State Department
of Health pursuant to Chapt r 66 C.R .S. 1963, or any amendments
thereto.
11 ·11·12 : VICIO DOG : GUARD DOG
la I o one shall keep, possess or harbor a vicious dog within the city . l t
hall be the duty of the Animal Warden o r hi s agents to tmpound
uch animal , and if impoundment cannot be made with safety t o th
Animal Warden or other citiz.ens . the animal may be d tro}ed
without notice to the owner, keeper or poss sor.
(bl Dogs maintained as guard dogs or placed in an enclosed area for th
protect.ion of persons or property shall not be mcluded und r t h•
sect.ion so long as they remain confined to a specific area under
com plete and ab olute control. All premi e on which guard dog ar
kept must con picuously po l all entrances to the premise taung
that guard dog are maintained on th premise
11 -11 -13 : PO I ON l :>IG DOG UNLAWF L
It shall be unlawful for any per n to pot on an dog or dog or to dt tnbut
poi on in any manner whatsoever with the mt nt of potsorung n. d or dog
11 ·11 11 · PROMOTION Of F IGHT
It ~hall be unlawful for any per on to cau , m ttgat or encourage any
amm I t o fight with another of 1l!I own peel or with another of a diff rent
pec ie ll hall be unlawful to maintain any pla wh an arumal are
permitted to fight for exhibition. for wa er or for port.
11 ·11 ·1 ~) thru 11 -11 -20
l rd • I . 2
R rved
.\rtid 11 -n1m
72' I
a e al
I •
•.
• •
-•
•
11·11·2
11 11 ·2! 8 • DO. MENT OF ANIMAL
I t hall I>" unlu• ful or any pe on to a bBndon any animal or t-0 ceu e uch to
be don
11 .11 :n C Rt:ELTY TO A. l 1AL
or an person l-0 o v rdrhe, ov rload , dnv wh n
rtu . d pm· of n sary su tenance, cruelly beat,
, or to carTy Ln an vehicl or otherwise tran port in a
cru I and inhuman manner . any animal , or to cau any of thes act to be don
It hall be unlewfui for any person having charge or custody of any animal to
fail to prov1d 1t with proper food . drink and protect.ion from the weather. or to
cau an.v of th acts to be d on .
11 ·1 I ! I . ~!O L E Tl ~G BIRD
It hal l be unlawful for any person within th city to at any tim frighten ,
hoot at, wound , kill , take . capture, en nare, net , trap or m any other manner
mol tor injur any bird, fowl or water fowl , or in any mann r mole tor injure
th ne t , egg or young of any uch bird , fowl or water fowl.
II II .!5 .
11 11 !i
.,
II or gh e awa dyed .
Im . fowl . rabbi
'
• •
-•
• I•
•
..
11·11·27
City of Englewood. In issuing such permits, the city shall establish
such reasonable rules and regulations and fees a s are nece sary and
proper for the safe control and management of t he aforem ntioned
animals. bird and reptiles .
(bl Th provisions of thi s sect.ion shall not apply to :
(I I A bona fide publicly or privately owned zool gical park .
121 A publicl owned animal pound .
(31 A veterinary ho pita!.
( 41 A bona fid reeearch inst.it.ut.ion u ing pet anunal for a
scientific research .
• •
-•
• I•
•
EMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDIN\, ACTION
OR REC
DATE:
Sl:BJECT:
RECO"MENDATIO.
ENDATIO OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
.July 31, 1975
D<>t rm ination of Ci y's liabil~ty in h
AMAX/Dravo suit
That Council authorize th City to hire
outs ide counsel to d termin th ext nt of
th City's liability in h exis 1n9 agree-
men wi h AMAX cone rnin of
th Ra ,.h Cr C< l l h
harinq of all cos s ther
A
•.
• •
-
·.
•
• •
BOARD
ackenberg, Jones, Ul l er•
k
c or of Utilities
•• and att p t o
filed by Dravo
-a on the
ted.
nd o
• •
-
•
•
• •
ENGLE WOOD WATE R AND SEWER BOARD
SPECIAL MEETING
J ly 31, 1 7
.'leml:; s f're5cnt: Fullerton, Hayes, Schnackenberg, Jones, Ullery
~·mbers Abs nt: Sovern, Taylor, Ba bcock
Alsn Presen C. B. Carrol l, Jr ., Director of Uti lities
ha1rman Full r on called h meting o discuss and attemp t o
he City'i; position in the pending suit filed by Dravo
A.MAX, concerning co t overruns on the
Mr. oc ent red he m e ing at 5:20 , and was seated .
'
• •
-
DATE :
SUBJECT:
• •
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDIN ACTION
OR REC MMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
July 31, 1975
Determination of City's liability in he
AMAX/Dravo suit
RECO~NDATION: Tha Council authorize the City to hire
outside couns l to determin the e x ten of
h City' liability in he exis ing agree-
mPn wi h AMAX cone rning construe ion of
h Ran~h Cr C< Ll c ion Syst m and th
~haring of l cos s here o.
ull
• •
-•
• •
ENGLE WOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
SPECIAL MEETING
July 31, 1975
Membe s Present: Fullerton, Hayes, Schnackenberg, Jones, Ullery
~embers Absent: Sovern, Taylor, Babcock
Also Present: C. B. Carroll, Jr., Direc or of Utilities
hajrman Full rton called he mee ing o discuss and attempt to
rc,.olve he City',, position in the pending suit filed by Dravo
Corpora ion against AMAX, concerning cost overruns on he
Mea ow Cr ek Dam .
Mr. Babcock en red theme ing a 5:20 , and was seated.
• •
-•
0
•
Mr. Jones supported the motion by saying that Englewood citizens may
resent an out-of-court settlement if the City's and AMAX's case
is as strong as AMAX attorneys claim.
The motion passed unanill'IOusly.
It was c ommented that the Council should seek the City attorney's
advice in selecting proper counsel .
Discussion then centered around the course of action should i
be determined that the City does, in fact, share the liability
with AMAX.
Mr. Schnackenberg moved:
Mr. Hayes seconded: That the City should proceed with th
lawsuit should we find that the City
shares liability with AMAX in the suit.
Th motion passed unanimously.
The meeting adjourned at 5:50 P.H.
Respectfully submitted,
Charles B. Carroll, Jr.
•.
..
• •
-
-
•
DTE:
SUB.lECT:
•
• (•
•
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDIN G ACTION
OR RECOMMENDA TION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
July 31, 1'!75
D tPrmina ion of City 's liabili~y in h
AMAX/Dravo uit
ENDATION: That Council
outside couns
City to hire
the Ci y 's li bility
ment w1 h AMAX con~~
he R.lnrh Cr ~ C1 ll
sha ring of all cos s
e x n of
' .
'
• •
'
-
,.
('
DATE:
SUB ECT:
•
• •
1El'ORA1'DUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGN PlG ACTION
OR RECO'IMENDATION OF THE ENGLr.WOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
July 31, 1975
Law sui be wee AMAX and Dravo over lleged
cost ov rruns
RECO"'.MENDATIO, : That Council proc d wi h trying th sui
ha is pending be w r AMAX nd Dravo,
~hould Englewood 's legal coun el d termin
tha he Ci y 's agree nt with AMAX bind
he Ci y o shar i he liability of U'"h
a law suit.
•
•
• •
-
'
•
• •
ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
SPECIAL Mf.ETT c.
July 1, I 7 r:,
lembers resent: Fullerton , Ha yes , Schnack nbe q, Jones, lll le
lso Pr se h
C. i r111an fulle r ~
r solve •r. Ci
Co r ra ion aq
ado Cr .,k
M
So ern, Taylor, abt-o~k
c. B. Ca rroll, J r., Ci rec~or of Utilities
and w s sea ed.
•ou ld recommend o
s rve he Cit y '
the possibilitr
hindi Q on :.hP
e tlem nt .
sel o
. '
•.
..
• •
DATE:
SUFIJECT:
•
• •
. .
'IEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEW D CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ArTIQ
OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE N ~LEWOOD W TER AND SEWE BOl\PD
July 31, 1975
Determination of Ci y's liability in he
AMAX/Dravo sui
RECOMMENDATION: Tha Council authorize the City to hire
ou side counsel to determine the exten of
the City' liability in he existing agree-
men wi h A."1.1'.X concerning construe ion of
thE" R;inrn Cr1> C< 11 ction System and the
sharing of al l os s th re o.
• .
• •
-
'
•
• •
ENGLEWOOD WATER A' SEWER BOARD
SPECIAL "' ETINS
July .n. ')7'i
l~mb rs Pres nt: Fullerton, Hav es , Schnackenberg, Jones, Ullery
So ern, Taylor, a oc
;,1 0 Pr sent.: c. B. Carroll, Jr ., Direc or of Utilities
C1 irman Fullerton
r solve h c~ y's
Corpora ion agains
. eadow Creek 0 m.
called th ee inq ~a discuss and attemp to
position in the pending suit filed by Dravo
AMAX. co cerning co av rruns on the
M . Babcoc entered the meeting ar 5:2 , a .d ~as sea ed. '
• •
-•
• -
Mr. Jones supported the motion by saying that Englewood citizens may
resent an out-of-court settlement if the City's and AMAX's case
is as strong as AMAX attorneys claim.
The motion passed unanimously.
It was commented that the Council should seek the City attorney's
advice in selecting proper counsel .
Discussion then centered around the course of action should it
be determined that the City does, in fact, share the liability
with AMAX.
Mr . Schnackenberg moved:
Mr. Hayes seconded: That the City should proceed with the
lawsuit should we find that the City
shares liability with AMAX in the suit.
Th motion pas11ed unanimously.
The eting ad journed at 5:50 P.H.
11pectfully 11ul::Jlllitted,
Charle• B. Carroll, Jr.
•
,
'
• •
-
(
•
•
DATE:
S RJECT:
•
• •
IE"10RA UM TO THE ENGLEW D CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACT OA
R RE OMMENDATION OF THE EN GLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
July 31, 1975
D ermination of Ci y 's liability in h
AMAX/Dra v o sui
Rl:.'C )o!ENDATION: That Counci
men
the
harin
• •
-•
• •
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY cot: CIL REGARDIN G ACTION
OR REC
DATE:
SUBJECT:
RECCMMENDATIO
NDATIO OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER B RD
July 31, l 75
La sui be w en AMAX nd Dravo over alleged
cos ov rruns
Th t Council proceed with tryin the suit
ha~ is pending be w e AMAX and Dravo,
ohou. Englewood's legal counsel de ermine
that h City'1 gree nt with AMAX hinds
Ci~y o share .n the li hility o such
a la sui .
R sf fully s
• .
'
• •
-•
• •
ENGLEWOOD WATE F' A ID SEWE R BOARD
SPEC IAL :Sl:'f' IG
July l, ,-
Members Present: Fullerton, Ha v s, Schnackenberg, Jones, U lery
'le ers Ab . nt:
Al o I'rese t:
Sovern, Taylor, ab<-ock
C . B. Carroll Jr ., i rect o r of Utili ies
cal led the mee i nq ~o discuss a nd a e.~p
position in the pendinq suit filed by ::>ravo
A.~X. concerning co t o v• rru s on lhe
ieJ them tinq • 5:20, nd w s s a d.
•
• •
-
DATE :
SUBJECT:
•
• •
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDIN G ACTIO
OR RECOMMENDATIO~ OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
July 31 , 1975
De ermination of City's liability in th
AMAX/Dravo suit
Rr.C "·"il: ATION: That Co ncil u horize the City to hir
~ut id~ counsel to determine th ext nt of
th C ty' l abil y in th existing agr e-
r.t w1t.h A." concerning construe ion of
tn Ra!l "h Cr k C< 11 ction t "' and h
sharinq of all costs th r
'·./ . ,
..
• •
,
-
•
•
• •
ENGLEWOOD WATER MID SEWER BOARD
SPECIAL ''l-'ETlNC,
July Jl. l ""''i
~embers Present: Fullerton, Hayes, Schnackenbe r g, Jones, Ullery
l mbers Absent: Sovern, Taylor, RabcocK
Also Present: C. B. Carroll J r., ire~ or of Utilities
Ch ~rman Fullerton called the e in ·o discuss and a emp
re olve the Ci-y's position in the p ndrnq .uit filed by Dravo
.o rpora ion aga inst AMAX, con cernin co· ov•rruns on the
1 adow Creek Darn .
Mr. Babcock ente Pd h me ing a~ 5:20 , d was sea ed.
d
'
• •
-• •
Mr. Jones supported the motion by saying that Englewood citizens may
resent an out-of-court settlement if the City's and AMAX's case
is as strong as AMAX attorneys claim.
The motion passed unanimously.
It was commented that the Council should seek the City attorney's
advice in selecting proper counsel.
Discussion then centered around the course of action should it
be determined that the City does, in fact, share he liability With AMAX.
Mr. Schnackenberg moved :
Mr. Hay • seconded: That the City should proc d with th
law1uit •hould we find that the Ci y
•hares liability wi h AMAX in the IUit .
The motion .P&Hed unanimously.
The eting adjourned a 5:50 P.M.
spectfully •ubai ed,
Charle• B. Carroll, Jr.
• •
-
DATE :
S f\JECT:
:C MMI:
•
• •
•=-.c===:===
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDIN G ACTIO .
OR RECO"IMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER ROAP.D
TIO.':
July 31, 1975
De ennination of City's liability in
AMAX /Oravo suit h
'
• •
-
-
(
DATE:
SUBJECT:
• •
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDIN G ACTION
OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
July 31, 1975
Law sui betw en AMAX and Dravo over all ged
cost overruns
RECOMMENOATIO That Council proceed with trying the suit
that is pending between AMAX and Dravo,
should Englewood's legal counsel determin
tha the City's agr e nt with AMAX binds
he City o share in he liability of such
a law suit.
spec f lly a
2
• •
-• I •
•
ENGLEWOOD WATER M ID "EWER BOARD
SPECIAL ~[£ r Ni.i
July n , 75
Memb <>rs Present: Fullerton, Ha yes, Schnackenberg, Jones, Ullery
"1embPrs Absen
Al s o P esen :
Sovern, Taylor , a bcock
C. B. Carrol J r., D1rPr,tor of Utilities
cdlled th "'e
position in h
AMAX , concei nin g co
s cuss and at o
g ~~it filed by Dravo
overruns on ~h
wa ea
•.
• •
-•
• •
Mr. Jones supported the motion by saying that Englewood citizens may
resent an out-of-court settlement if the City's and AMAX's case
is as strong as AMAX attorneys claim.
The motion passed unanimously.
It was commented that the Council should seek the City attorney's
advice in selecting proper counsel.
Discussion then centered around the course of action should it
be determined that the City does, in fact, share the liability
with AMAX .
Mr . Schnackenberg moved:
Mr. Hayes second d: That the City should proceed with e
lawsuit should -find that the City
shares liability with AMAX in the s uit .
Th motion passed unanimously.
Th meeting adjourned at S:SO P.M .
spectfully subalitted,
Charles B. Carroll, Jr.
• •
,
-
DATE:
S uBJECT :
•
• I•
•
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING AcTION
OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
July 31 , 1975
Determination of Ci y's liability in he
AMAX/Oravo suit
kECOM.~C.. A':'ION: That Council authorize th
outs ide counsel to d nn1ne the e x en of
h Ci y'a 1 abil ty in
m n wi h ll~ concerning co ~ ruc~ion
he Ra•.r h Crf! C1 1 1 ct1on yst a~.d
sharing of ~l osts here o.
• .
• •
,
-
DATE:
SUBJECT:
•
0
•
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION
OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
July 31, 1975
Law suit between AMAX and Dravo over alleged
cost overruns
RECOMMENDATION: ha Council proceed with trying the suit
that is pending bet en AMAX and Dravo,
should EnglelotOO<!'a 1 gal counsel determine
that the City's agreement with AMAX binds
the Ci y to share i n he liability of such
a law suit.
spec fully sublai ad,
A ac
'
• •
(
•
•
0 -
8
City of Englewood
·-------------------------3'005 El111 trHt
Eng1e ... ood Colorado 80110
Phone (303) 761 11 40
P R 0 C L A M A T I 0 N
HF.RFAS, th~ tragedy of C ncer i . all oo
we known to millions of American because of he
>11 tha accompan1e t; and
~HEREAS, h re are few famil1 in lngl -
wood, Co lorado h3t hav not been aff c ed by this dread disease; and
propo
nAY
hrou
ute has
'\AL CA~CER
ie~ a
o the
0
R, 'O 1
. pro la1
7
James L Taylor
MAY OR
'
• •
I