HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-12-20 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet.......
•
•
•
..
AGENDA FOR
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 20 , 1976
7 :30 P .M. Call to order , invocation by Reverend Fr ed Hah n,
Immanuel Lutheran Church , 3695 South Acoma Street ,
pledge of allegiance by Cub Scout Pack #137 , Webelows
Den #1 , and roll call .
1. Minute s .
(a) Minutes of Ll1e spectal meeting of Decem b er 7 ,
1976 . (Copies enclosed .)
2. Pre -Scheduled Visitors .
(a) Mr. and Mrs. Edward Cordova will appea r befor e
Ci y Council to request a transfer of license
for the Englewood Liquors , 3434 South Broadway ,
from Golda B. Marshall , James L . Girardot , and
Mary Lou Girardo . (Copies enclosed .)
3. Communications -No Action Recomme nded .
(a) Minutes of the Hous ing Authority meeting of
October 26 , 1976. (Copies enclosed .)
(b) Minutes of the Police Pens i on Board meetin g o f
December 8 , 1976 . (Copies enclosed .)
(c) Minutes of the Library Board meeting of Decem -
ber 14 , 1976 . (Copies enclosed .)
(d) Financial report for the month of November, 1976 .
(Copies enclosed.)
(e) Memorandum from the Director of Personnel to t h e
City Manager concerning his attendance at the
Annual Conference of the Intern ational Perso nne l
Management Association in Washington , D. C.
from November 28 o December 2 , 1976 . (Copies
enclosed .)
'
I • •
0
•
•
•
•
• I •
•
Page 2
De ce mb e r 2 1 A,e aa a
4 .
~
Communications -Action Recommended .
(a) Memorandum from the Director of Utilit ies to the
City Manager concerning an encroachment agreement
for Plaza de Medico located in the 3500 block of
South Washington. (Copies enclosed.)
~) Memorandum from the Director of Utilities to the
City Manager concerning gas service easement for
the gas distribution at the Bi -City Plant. (Copies
enclosed.)
5 . City Attorney .
6 .
Resolutions .
(a ) Resolution concerning the establishment of the
1977 salaries for the City Manager , Ci t y Attorney ,
Municipal Court Judge, and Associate Judges .
(C opies enclosed.)
Other Mat er s .
(b) Report on lawsuit concern ing clocks in custody of
the Englewood Police Department .
(c) Attorney 's Ch oice .
City Manager .
~a ) Memorandum from the Director of Public Wo r ks
t o the City Manager concerning the meet i ng schedu le
for Li tle Dry Creek . (Copies enclosed .)
Memorandum fr om the Assistant Ci ty Ma nager and
Director of Finance to the City Manager con -
cerning budget amendments for 1976 . (Cop i es and
Resolution enclosed .)
Memorandum from the Assistan t Ci ty Manager to the
City Manager concerning proposed police and fire
legislation for 1977 . (Copies enclosed .)
Memorandum from the Ci y Manager concerning vacan -
cies on the boards and commissions in 1977 . (Copies
enclosed .)
Manager 's Choice .
• •
0
• -• •
-
Page 3
December 20 Agenda
7. V1 sltors .
8 . General Discu ssion .
(a) Mayor's Choice.
(b) Council Membe r 's Choice .
9 . Adjournment .
~!!~
City Manager
'
..
• • •
0
•
-
•
•
•
SPECIAL ~IEETING:
•
-
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO
December 7 , 1976
,.
I (j.
The City Council of the City of Englewood , Arapahoe County , Colorado ,
met in s pecial session on December 7 , 1976 at 7:30p .m.
Mayor Taylor , presiding, called the meeting to order.
The invocation was given by Councilman Brown. The Pledge of
Allegiance was led by Cub Scout Pack #347, Webelows Den #1 .
Mayor Taylor asked for r oll call . Upon the call of the r oll ,
the f ollowing were present:
Council Members Williams, Severn, Smith , Brown , Taylo r.
Absent: Co~,cil Mem bers Mann , Clayton .
The ·layer declared a q_uorum presen .
Also present were: Ci ty Manager McCown
Asst . C1ty Manager Nollenberger
City Attorney Berardini
Dir . of Finance/City Clerk Jam es
Deputy City Cle rk Varner
******
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CIT Y
COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 8 , 1976 . Councilman Brown seconded the motion .
Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays: None .
Absent: ouncil Members Mann , Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN BROWN MOVED TO APPROVE THE MIINTES OF THE REGULAR CITY
OUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 15 , 1976 . Councilman Sovern seconded the motion .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO AMEND THE SECOND ENTENCE IN PARAGRAPH
EIGHT OF PAGE FOUR TO READ "COUNCILMAN MANN AGREE WITH TH1 PROBLEM OF TREATED
WATER WASTE AND STATED THAT THE CITY STAFF SHOULD ENFORCE REGULATIONS TO
PREVENT IT ." Councilman Severn seconded the motion. Upon a call of the
roll, the vote resulted as follows:
••
'
• •
•
•
•
•
0 t• -
December 7, 1976
Page 2
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Severn, Smith , Brown, Taylor.
Nays: None.
Absent: Council Members Mann, Clayton .
The Hay or declared the motion carried.
Upon a call of the roll, the v ote on the original motion as amended
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Nembers Wi ll iams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent : Council ~lembers Mann, Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
Pre-scheduled visitor M. M. Summers, 3140 South Delaware , did not
appe ar .
******
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO CONSIDER AGENDA ITEM 4c AT THIS TIME .
Councilman Brown seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , t he vo te
r e s ulted as follows :
Ayes : Coun cil Me mb ers Wi lliams , So v e rn, Smith , Br own , Tay lor.
Nay s : No ne .
Absent : Council Members Mann , Clayton .
The Hayo r declared the motion carried .
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN
A PROCLAMATION DECLARING DECEMBER 9 , 1976 AS GEORGE PERRIN DAY . Councilman
Williams sec onded the motion . Upon a call of the r oll , the vote r esulted as
foll ows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Sovern, Smith , Brown , Taylor •
Nays: None .
Absent: Council Members Mann, Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Mayor Taylor presented this proclamation to George Perrin, and
Mr . Perrin thanked City Council for t his honor .
* * * * * *
• ·' .. I !
'!'
'
I • •
0
-
•
•
Decemb er 7, 1976
Page 3
•
-,.
Marte n Lathrup, 3259 South Clarkson , appeared and presented a
letter froffi South Metro Denver Citizens Band Radio Operators addressed to
Utex, Inc ., 604 South Jason , and also a letter addressed to Ci ty Council
concerning interference of radio communications on pre-assigned radio
frequencies .
Mayor Taylor noted that this matter would be discussed du r ing
Council 's next study session .
******
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO ALLOW ATTORNEY HARRY CARLENO TO SPEAK
AT THIS TIME ON BEHALF OF AN APPLICATION FOR A HOTEL AND RESTAURANT LIQUOR
LICENSE FROM JAMES L . PLill~R , COMPANY , D/B/A FRATELLI 'S PIZZA , 1200 EAST
HAMPDEN AVENUE , FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE .
Councilman Severn seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote
resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent: Cow1cil Members Mann, Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Attorney Harry Carlene , 3460 South Sherman , appeared and presented
a waiv e r of the thirty-day requirement for liquor license public hearings .
COUNCI~~ SMITH MOVED TO SET THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 10 ,
1917 AT 6 :00 P .M. AND SETTING THE BOUNDARIES OF ONE MILE RADIUS . Councilman
Br own seconded the moti on . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as
follows :
Aye s : Council Members Williams, Seve rn , Smi th , Brown , Taylor.
Nays: None .
Absent: Co un cil Members Man n, Clay on.
The May or e clared t he moti on carried .
******
COilliCILMAN S!HTH MOVED TO CONSIDER AGENDA ITEM "C OUNCIL MEMBER 'S
CHOICE " AT THIS TIME. Co uncilman Severn seconded the motion. Upon a call
of t he roll, the vote resul ted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Severn , Smith , Brown , Taylor •
Nays : None.
Absent: Council Members Mann, Clayton .
The May or declared the motion carried .
• ·'
0 1 \ !
or
• •
0
f
-
•
•
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 4
•
0
•
COUNCILMAN BROWN MOVED TO VOID THE MOTION MADE AT THE COUNCIL
MEETING OF NOVEMBER l , 1976 PROVIDING FOR THE CITY TO PAY THE MEMBERSHIP
DUES FOR EACH COUNCIL MEMBER TO JOIN A SERVICE CLUB OF THEIR CHOICE BECAUSE
OF UNFAVORABLE REACTION FROM THE PUBLIC AND BECAUSE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY'S
OPI NI ON . Councilman Williams seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll,
the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent : Counc i l Members ~lann , Cl ayton.
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
COUNCILMAN BROWN MOVED , FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES , THAT THE CITY
PAY ONLY FOR THE MULTIPHASIC PHYSICAL EXAMINATION FOR EACH COUNCIL ~MBER .
Councilman Williams seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote
resulted a s follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn, Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays: None.
Absent : Council Members Mann, Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO HEAR MRS . W. W. KELLY UNDER THE PRE -
SCHEDULED VISITOR SECTION OF THE AGENDA AT THIS TIME . Councilman Brown
seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roJl , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Members Williame., Severn , Smi "th , Brown , Taylor.
Nays : one .
Absent: Council Members Mann, Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Mrs . . W. Kelly, 3159 South University , appeared and stated that
the average taxpayer does not realize how much his taxes are unt il he receives
his bill . She also stated hat increased assessments do not necessarily cause
higher taxes.
Mrs. Kelly stated that there are many people wh o appreciate the
work of City Council , and she commended Councilman Brown for yielding to
the wishes of the people .
* * * * * *
'
) • •
0
f
(
•
•
•
-
December 7, 1976
Page 5
received:
May or Protem Clayton arrive d at the meeting at 8 :10p.m.
* * * * * *
"C ommunications -No Action Re comnended" on the agenda were
a. t4inutes of the Planning a nd Zoning Commissi on meeting
of November 9 , 1976.
b. Minutes of the Library Bo ard meeting o f November 9, 1976.
c . Min ut es o f the Parks a nd Re c reat i on Co mmissio n meeting of
November 11 , 1 976 .
d. Minut e s o f the City of En glewood Retirement Board meeting
of Nove ber 12 , 1976 .
e. Minutes of the Career Service Bo ard meeting of November 23,
1976.
f. Memorandum fr om the Director of Parks and Recreation t o
the City Manager c onc e rning attendance at the 1976
National Co ngress f or Recreation and Parks .
g . Letter from the Municipal Finance Officers Association
to the Director o f Finance concerning the Annual Financial
Report of the City of Englewood for the fiscal year ended
Dec ember 31 , 1976 .
Mayor Taylor noted that there is a vacancy on the Library Board
and the Retirement Board which need t o be filled before the end of the year.
Concerning agenda item 3g , Councilman Smith noted that the
Municipal Finance Officers Associatio n has hi gh ly commended the City
for its high standard o f financial r e p orting .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a list o f twenty-two liquor licenses
that need to be renewe d and a me mo randum from the Chief o f Police concerning
related police calls over the p as t year. Thos e l iquor licenses to be renewed
are:
Zimmermans
Holly South
Hampden West
Golden Fiddle
Hilda's Cafe
Snow 's Lounge
Casual Lounge
Belleview Bowl
Bar Harbor
BJ's In
27 96 South Broadway
3535 So uth Huron
3517 South Elati
3370 South Acoma
4386 South Broadway
2893 South Broadway
65 West Floyd
49 00 South Federal
34 84 So uth Broa dway
3467 South Broadway
'
••
" -
I • •
.• I ( . ' 1
•
•
•
December 7 , 1 97 6
Page 6
VFW
Knights o f Columbus
Eagles
Elks
Thorobred Liquors
Supreme Liquors
Old Town Liquors
Englewood Liquors
Glass Bottle Liquors
MD Pharmacy
Drug Fair
Se ven Eleven
•
-
3860 So uth Jason
380 0 So uth Windermere
3384 South Broadway
3690 South Jason
5050 South Federal
5112 South Broadway
325 East Jefferson
3434 South Broadway
336 West Hampden
2895 South Broadway
4204 South Broadway
4400 South Broadway
Attorney Richard C. Landrum representing William Gilmore and
Rodney Utz, ovners of The John , 90 West Belleview; Arthur Snow , own er of
Snow's Lounge , 2893 Sou th Broadway; and Maurice Soliman, owne r of Bar
Harbor , 3484 South Br oadway , were present to answer Council 's questions
concerning police calls to their establishments .
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED TO RENEW THE LIQUOR LICENSES AS LISTED.
Councilman Smi th seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll, the vote
resulted as follows:
Taylor. Ayes : Council Memb ers Williams, Severn , Smi th, Brovn , Clayt on ,
Nay s : None .
Absent : Council Member Mann.
The May or declared the moti on carried .
******
Assistant City Manager Nollenberger presented a recommendation from
the Water and Sewer Board that City Council approve Supplement #52 to the
Southgate Sanitation District connector a greement. He explained that this
is a 13.42 acre tract in Greenwood Plaza, an industrial park in Greenwo od
Village located at Or ch ard and I -25 . He stated that only 8 .8 acres will be
developed and that usage would equate to residential .
CO UNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED TO APPROVE SUPPLEMENT /15 2 TO SOUTHGATE
SANITATION DISTRICT CONNECTOR AGREEMENT. Co uncilman Clayton seconded the
motion . Upon a call o f the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Taylor . Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn, Smi th, Brown , Clayton ,
Nays: None .
Absent: Council Membe r Mann .
Th e Mayor declared the motion carried.
******
•
I • •
0
f
•
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 7
•
-I•
As si s tant City Mana ger No llenberger presented a recommendation
from th e Water and Sewer Board that City Council approve a revision in the
l4unicipal Code to increas e sewer construction inspection fees to $12 .50/hour
f or weekdays and $18 .75/hour for after no rmal duty hours , weekends and
holidays. He explained that this increase io necessary in or der to keep
this function self-supporting .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO REVISE THE
MUNICIPAL CODE (ORDINANCE NO . 5 , PARAGRAPH 1 , SERIES OF 1972 , ANP AMENDED
ORDINANCE NO . 1 , PARAGRAPH 1 , SERIES OF 1973) TO READ $12 .50/HOUR WEEKDAYS
AND $18 . 75/HOUR AFTER NORMAL DUTY HOURS , WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS . Councilman
Sovern seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as
f ollo;.rs :
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Sovern , Smith, Brown, Clayton ,
Taylor.
Nay s : None .
Absent : Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN S~UTH MOVED TO RESCHEDULE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CO NSI DER
A HOTEL AND RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION FOR G.G.O., INC., D/B/A
SIZZLER FAMILY STEAK HOUSE , 5151 SOU'l'H BROADWAY , FOR JANUARY 10 , 1977 AT
8 :00P .M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE APPLICANT CAN BE HEARD . Co un cilman
Brown seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote r e sulte d a s
follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Sovern , Smith, Br own, Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent : Council Memb e r Mann .
The ~layo r declare d the motion carri e d ,
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown requested that agenda i t ems 4e , memorandum
co ncerning an encroachment agreement for Plaza de Medico located in the
3500 block of South Washington , and 4f , memorandum conce r ning a gas service
easement for the gas distr ibution system at the Bi-City Wa s t ewa ter Treat-
ment Plant , be withdra;.rn from the agenda to allow for furt her review before
presentation to City Council.
COUNCILMAN MITH MOVED TO WITHDRAW AGENDA ITEMS 4e AND 4f UNTIL
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON DECEt-!BER 20, 1976 . Councilman Clayton seconded
t he motion, Upon a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as follo ws :
••
• •
·' I !
I . ,
~
•
•
•
December 7, 1976
Page 8
•
-I•
Ayes : Counc il Members Williams , Sove rn, Smith , Brown , Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays: None .
Absent : Counc il Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
D~TRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMEN MANN AND WILLIAMS
BY AUTHOR! TY
ORDINANCE NO . 60
SERIES OF 1976
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2(c), CHAPTER 6 , TITLE XIII, OF THE 1969
ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE , RELATING TO COLLATERAL SECURITIES ON BANKS HOLDING
CITY CASH DEPOSITS .
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED TO PASS ORDINANCE NO . 60 , SERIES OF 1976 ,
ON FINAL READING . Councilman Sovern seconded the motion . Upon a call of the
r oll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council t4embers Williams , So vern, Smith , Brown , Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays: None .
Absent : Council Member Man n .
The May or declared the motion carried .
******
INTRODUC ED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN CLAYTON
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 12 AND 13 , CHAPTE R 3 , TITLE X:V, ARTICLE II ,
OF THE 1969 ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE , AUTHORIZING THE OPTIONAL US E OF
SCHEDULED FI.AT RATE OR MEASURED METERED SERVICE FOR RESIDENTIAL WATER
USAGE WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED TO PASS ON FIRST READING A BILL FOR AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 12 AND 13 , CHAPTER 3 , TITLE X:V , ARTICLE II, OF
THE 1969 ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE , AUTH ORIZING THE OPTIONAL USE OF SCHEDULED
FLAT RATE I)R MEASURED METERED SERVICE FOR RESIDENTIAL WATER USAG E WITHIN THE
CITY OF E GLEWOOD. Councilman Williams seconded the motion •
City Attorney Berardini explained that this Bill provides for
new residential water customers t o choose between flat or metered service
and for existing customers to change from metered to flat rate service .
•• . ' ·' \ !
'T
I • •
-
(
•
• (
•
•
-
December/, 1976
P~e 7
rl Ssistant City Manager Nollenberger presented a recommendation
from the Water and Sewer Boa rd that City Council approve a revision in the
Municipal Code to increase sewer construction inspection fees to $12 .50/hour
for weekdays and $18 .75/hour for after no rmal duty hours , weekends and
holidays. He explained that this increase is necessary in order t o keep
this function self-supporting .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO REVISE THE
MUNICIPAL CODE (ORDINANCE NO . 5 , PARAGRAPH 1 , SERIES OF 1972 , ANP AMENDED
ORDINANCE NO . 1, PARAGRAPH 1, SERIES OF 1973) TO READ $12 .50/HOUR WEEKDAYS
AND $18 .75/HOUR AFTER NORMAL DUTY HOURS , WEEKENDS .PJD HOLIDAYS . Councilman
Severn seconde d the motion . Upon a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as
follo1o1s :
Ayes: Cou ncil Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Clayton ,
Taylor.
Nay s : None .
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The Mayo r declared the motion carried .
******
COUNCILMAN S~UTH MOVED TO RESCHEDULE THE PUBLIC HEARING TO CO NSI DER
A HOTEL AND RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION FOR G.G.O., INC ., D/B/A
SIZZLER FAM I LY STEAK HOUSE , 5151 SOU TH BROADWAY , FOR JANUARY 10 , 1971 AT
8 :00 P .M. OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE APPLICANT C.PJ BE HEARD . Co un cilman
Brown s econded the motion . Upon a call of t he r oll , t h e vote re sulted a s
follows :
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith, Br own , Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent: Council Memb e r Mann .
Th e Mayo r declare d the mo tion carri e d .
******
City Manager McC own reques ed that agenda items 4e , memorandum
concerning an enc r oachme nt ~reement for Plaza de Medico located in the
3500 block of South Washington , and 4f , memorandum concerning a gas service
easement fo r the g a s distribution system at the Bi-City Wastewat er Treat-
ment Plant , be withdra1o10 f r om the agenda to allow for further re view b e fo re
presentation to City Council.
COUNCILMAN SMITH ~lOVED TC WITHDRAW AGENDA ITEMS e AND 4f UNTIL
THE CITY COU NCIL MEETING ON DECEI-!BER 20 , 1976 . Councilman Clayton seconded
the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
••
" -
I • 0
0
' r I . ,
'!
-
(
•
•
•
:. -
December 7, 1976
Page 9
Mr . Bera l ini added that control would come from rules and regulations t o
b e establi 5h ed by the Water and Sewer Board .
Councilman Sove rn stated that he feels this is poor timing because
o f the upc oming water improvement program . He stated that metered service
i s more fair because the customer pays only for the amount of water used and
because meters cut down on ove rall water waste .
Mayor Taylor noted that water is o ur most precious commodity a nd
that the waste of treated water must be stopped . He added that.this is
p oss ible through me tering .
Councilman Smith stated that this motion is premature be cause of
the upcoming water study .
Councilman Clayton stated that this is a matter o f fairness and
equal rights for the water user.
Upon a call o f the r o11 , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Clayt on .
Nays: Council Members Sovern, Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion defeated .
******
RESOLUTI ON NO. 62, SERIE S OF 1976
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF ENCORE , IN CO RPORATED, A DELAWARE
CORPORATION , D/B/A THE SOUTH DOOR , FOR A RETAIL 3.2% BEVERAGE LICENSE FOR
CONSUMPTION ON THE PREMISES OF THE LICENSEE, TO BE I..OCATED AT 5470 SOUTH
BRO ADWAY, ENGLEWOOD , COLORAD O.
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO . 62, SERIES OF 1976 .
Counc ilman Williams seconded the motion . Up on a call of the roll, the vote
resulted as fo llows:
Ayes: Co uncil Members Williams , Severn , Smith, Brown , Clayton ,
Taylor.
Nays: Non e.
Absent : Co uncil ~lember Mann.
The Mayor declared the motion carried ,
* * * * * *
••
• •
0
·' \ !
I 'I
'r
-
•
•
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 10
RESOLUTION NO. 63 , SERIES OF 1976
•
,. -
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING JOHN A. CRISWELL , ATTORNEY AT LAW, 3780 SOUTH BROADWAY,
ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO, AS SPECIAL COUNSEL IN LITIGATI ON TO BE COMMENCED TO
DETERMINE THE VALIDITY OF A CERTAIN SAND AND GRAVEL LEA SE ENCUMBER I NG CITY
PROPERTY CURRENTLY HELD BY !40TOR CRANE SERVICE COMPANY, A COLORADO CORPORATION .
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED TO PASS RES OLUTION NO . 63 , SERIES OF
1976 . Councilman Smith seconded the mo tio n. Upon a cal l of the roll , the
vo te resulted as follows:
Taylo r. Ayes: Co uncil Membe rs Williams , Severn , Smith, Brown, Clayt on,
Nays: None .
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion c arried .
******
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED TO REQUEST THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PRESENT
A WRITTEN REPORT CONCERNING SPECIAL ASSE SS !4ENT HARDSHIP CASES AT THE FIRST
CITY COUNCI L MEETING IN JANUARY . Councilman Seve r n seconded the motion .
Up o n a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as follows :
Taylor . Ayes: Council Members Williams, Severn , Smith , Br own , Clayton ,
Nays: None.
Absent : Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
City Attorney Berardini presented a brief report concerning two
law suits filed against the St ate of Colorado regarding the Police and Fire
Pensi on Funds.
Cq uncilman Severn suggested that the City Attorney and City
Manager 's office prepare a press release requesting other municipalities
and speci al districts to join in these suits.
* * * * * *
Mayor Taylor declared a recess at 9 :10 p .m. Council reconvened
at 9 :25 p .m. Upon a call of the roll , the following were present:
Council Members Williams, Severn , Smith, Brown, Clayton , Taylor . I • •
0
. 1
-
•
•
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 11
At~P.nt : Council Membe r Mann .
•
-
The Mayor declared a quo rum present .
******
,.
City I-lana.ger McCown presented a memorandum conc erning the senio r
center name memorial ization .
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED TO POSTPON E THIS ITEM UNTIL THE CITY
COUNCIL MEETING ON JANUARY 3 , 1977, AND THAT THE CITY STAFF ARRANGE A STUDY
SESSION WITH THE ENGLEWOOD CENTENNIAL -BICENTENNI AL FOUNDATION . Councilman
Brown seconded the motion . Upon a call of the r oll , the vote resulted a s
follows :
Aye s : Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Cl ayto n ,
Taylor .
Nays: None .
Absent : Council 1-lember Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the Assistant City
Manager c on cerning the "Englewood Citizen" newsletter . This newsletter has
been published monthly sinc e June o f 1976 , and Mr . McCown requested Council 's
direction for 1977 pub l ications . He noted that it is an annual expenditur e
of a pproximately $24 ,000 t o publish this newsletter every month .
After discus sion , Co uncil decided to take a poll in February to
receive feedback f r om the citizens .
* * * * * *
City 1-lanager McCown pres ented a memorandum from the Director of
Fina ce concerning a status report on the Ri ver Development Pro ject. He
noted that a dditional funds may be needed for this project because settlement
c osts for the land are running higher than expected .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the Directo r of
Financ e concerning changes in the State Liquor Code . He stated that the
state has a new Class A classification entitled "tavern license" and that
the state has changed the effecti ve date o f liquor licenses from the calendar
year to the anniversary date ,
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED TO REQUEST THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE
AN ORDIHA!ICE REVISING THE ENGLEWOOD ~ruNICIPAL CODE TO CORRESPOND WITH THESE
CHANGES IN THE STATE LIQUOR CODE . Councilman Smith seconded the motion .
Upon a call of the roll , the vote re sulted as follovs ;
'
•
I • •
. , ' r f
"!"
•
•
•
I • -
December 7, 1976
Pa ge 12
Taylor .
Ayes : Council Member s Williams , So vern , Smith , Brown , Cl ayton ,
Nays: None .
Absent: Council Member l-lan n .
The May o r declared the motio n carried,
******
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the Assistant City
Manager concerning the establishment o f a Sewer Fund Construction Account
for additional funds from the 1971 E.P .A. Rehabilitation Grant in the amount
of $235 ,000 . He recommended that such an account be established for future
capital outlay towards future expansion of the Bi-City Treatment Plant . He
also noted that this account would be used to make up o r re ceive any differences
between sewer tap fees received and expenditures for debt retirement, cap ital
construction and front -end operating costs of the new facility .
Councilman Smith suggested that thi s mon ey be invested and that
any withdrawal s be made at budget time .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO SET UP A SEWER FUND CONSTRUCTI ON ACCOUNT.
Councilman Sovern seconded the motion .
Councilman Clayton stated that restrictions should be established
for this acc ount.
Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Sovern , Smith , Br own, Taylor .
Nays: Council Membe r Clayton .
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
******
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum concerning proposed
revisions to the State Water Quality Criteria and Stream Classification
System by the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission . He noted that a
letter will be sent to the Commission stating Council 's comments and/or
recommendations based on the study session discussion.
******
City Manager McCown noted that there will be a luncheon meeting
with City Council an d the Housing Authority on December 15 , 1976 at ]1 :30
a .m. followed by a topping-off ceremony for the Englewood housing project,
* * * * * *
••
I • •
. ,
(
•
•
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 1 3
•
-I •
C u:ICILMAN SOVERN MOVED TO HAVE A DINNER MEETING WITH THE PARKS
AliD RECRr ON CO ~!MI SSIO N ON JANUARY 20 , 1977 AT 6 :00 P .M. Councilman Brovn
seconde the motion. Upo n a call o f the r oll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ta ylo r. Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown, Clayton ,
Nays: None .
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a letter from the Chamber of Comme r ce
requesting City Council 's desires for holding meetings of the Arapahoe Mayor 's
Council .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO HOLD MONTHLY MEETINGS . The motion died
f o r lack of a second ,
COUNCILMAN BROWN MOVED TO HOLD t-1EETINGS EVERY OTHER MONTH . Council-
man Clay ton seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted
as foll ows:
Taylor .
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown, Clayton ,
Nays: None ,
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The May or declared the motion carried .
******
Willi Anderson, 4981 So uth Washi ngton , appeared and addressed
Council on several matters of concern . Among his comments , Mr . Anders on
ex p ~es sed his opinions as f ollows: the City needs better police protection ;
the ~u ters should be cleared of leaves ; Clarkson needs to be patched;
sug~es te d an amusement tax en golfers; beer should be allowed in the parks;
'nformation in the "Eng ewood Cit izen" should be published earlier; outside
sew r cus omers should be chart":ed higher rates ; in favor of a bond issue
o improve water pressure but not to provide water to outside districts;
and that the mistakes involved with c onstruction of the Senior Citizens
Center should be at the expense of the engineer or the architect .
* * • * • •
COUNCILMAN SMITH 140VED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATI'ORNEY TO PREPARE A
RESOLUTION FOR SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE CITY ATI'ORNEY AND CITY MANAGER
TO BE PRESENTED AT THE COUNCIL l·~TING 0 DECEMBER 20 , 1976 . Councilman
Severn seconded the motion . Upon a c all of the r oll , the vote resulted as
follows :
•
'
I • •
.· \ !
I . '
!
-
•
•
•
0
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 14
Taylor . Ayes: Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown , Clayton,
Nays: None .
Absent: Council Member Mann.
The Mayor declare d the mo ti o n carried .
******
Mayor Taylor adj ourned the City Council meet i ng at 10 :30 p .m.
City Clerk
•.
I • •
0
•
•
•
SPEC IAL ME ETIN G:
•
0 -
CO UN CIL CHAMBERS
CI TY OF EN GLEWOOD , COLO RAD O
De c ember 7 , 1976
I c2 .
The City Co un c i l of the City of En glew oo d , Arapaho e Co unty, Colo r a d o ,
met in special se s si on on De cember 7, 19 76 at 7 :30 p .m.
May or Taylo r, presiding , called the meeting to order .
The invocation wa s given by Co uncil man Brown . The Pledge o f
Alleg iance was led by Cub Sc out Pack #347 , Webelows Den #1 .
May or Taylor asked f or r oll call . Up on the call of the r o ll,
the f o llowing were present :
Council Members Williams, Se vern , Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Absent : Council Members Mann , Clayton .
The Mayor declared a ~uorum present .
Also present were : City Manager McCown
Asst . City Manager Nollenberger
City Attorney Berardini
Dir . of Finance/City Clerk James
Deputy City Clerk Varner
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY
COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 8 , 1976 . Councilman Brown seconded the moti on .
Upon a call of the r o ll , the vote resulted as foll ows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Se vern , Smith , Brown, Taylo r.
Nays: None .
Absent: Co uncil Members Mann, Clayton .
The May or dec l ared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
COUNCI LMAN BROWN MOVED TO APPR OVE THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY
COUN CIL MEET I NG OF NOVEMBER 1 5, 197 6. Councilm an Sever n seconded the mot i on .
COUNCI LMAN SMITH MOVED TO AMEND THE SECOND SENTENCL It PARAGRAPH
EIGHT OF PAGE FOUR TO READ "C OUN CILMAN MANN AG REED WITH THE PROBLEM OF TREA TED
WATER WA STE AND STATED THAT THE CITY STAFF SHOULD ENF ORCE REGULATIONS TO
PRE VE NT I T ." Co uncilman Severn sec onded the mot ion. Upon a call of the
r oll, the v ote resulted as f ollows:
'
•
,_
• •
.. · \ {
I
,
'!
•
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 2
•
•
Ayes : Council Members Wi lliams, So vern , Smit h, Brown , Taylor.
Nays: None .
Absent: Council Members Mann , Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
.. -
Upon a call of the roll , the vote on the o rig inal motion as amended resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent: Council Members Mann , Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
appear . Pre-scheduled visit or M. M. Summe rs , 3140 South Delaware, did no t
******
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED 1D CONSIDER AGENDA ITEM 4c AT THIS TIME .
Councilman Brown sec onded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Membe r s Willi ams , Sove rn , Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent: Council Members Mann , Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
COilliCIL~4N SOVERN MOVED TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN
A PROCLAMATION DECLARING DECEMBER 9 , 1976 AS GEORGE PERRIN DAY . Councilman
Williams seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as foll ows:
Ayes: Co uncil Members Williams, Sovern, Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays: None .
Absent: Council Members Mann , Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried,
Mayor Taylor presented this proclamation to George Perrin , and Mr . Perrin thanked City Council for this honor.
******
..
• •
0
-
•
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 3
•
-I•
Marten Lathrup , 325 9 South Clarks on , appeared and presented a
letter from South Metro Denver Citizens Band Radio Ope rators addressed to
Utex, Inc., 3604 South Jason , and also a letter addressed t o City Council
concerning interference of radio communications on pre-assigned radio
frequencies .
May o r Taylor noted that this matter would be discussed during
Council 's next study session .
******
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO ALLOW ATTORNEY HARRY CARLENO TO SPEAK
AT THIS TIME ON BEHALF OF AN APPLICATION FOR A HOTEL AND RESTAURANT LIQU OR
LICENSE FROM JAMES L . PLUMMER , COMPANY, D/B/A FRATELLI 'S PIZZA , 1200 EAST
HAMPDEN AVENUE , FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE .
Councilman Severn seconded the motion . Up on a call of the roll , the vo te
resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays: None .
Absent : Council Members Mann , Clayton .
The May or declared the motion carried .
Attorney Harry Carlene , 3460 South Sherman , appeared and presented
a waiver of the thirty-day requirement for liquor license public hearings .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO SET THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR JANUARY 10 ,
1977 AT 6 :00 P .M. AND SETTING THE BOUNDARIES OF ONE MILE RADIUS. Councilman
Brown seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes : Coun cil Members Williams , Severn , Smi th, Brown , Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent: Council Members Mann, Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
CO UNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO CONSIDER AGENDA ITEM "C OUNCIL HEI>lBER 'S
CHOICE " AT THIS TIME . Councilman Severn seconded the motion . Upon a call
of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Severn , Smith, Brown , Taylor .
Nays: None .
Absent: Counc il Members Mann, Clayton .
The !>1ay or declared the motion carried .
'
••
,. .
·. . , ·' \ (
'r
I • •
0
f
•
•
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 4
•
•
, .
COUNCILMAN BROWN MOVED TO VOID THE MOTION MADE AT THE COUNCIL
MEETING OF NOVEMBER 1 , 1976 PROVIDING FOR THE CITY TO PAY THE MEMBERSHIP
DUES FOR EACH COUNCIL MEMBER TO JOIN A SERVICE CLUB OF THEIR CHOICE BECAUSE
OF UNFAVORABLE REACTION FROM THE PUBLIC AND BECAUSE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 'S
OPINION . Councilman Williams seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll,
the v ote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn, Smith, Brown , Taylor.
Nays : None .
Absent : Council Members Mann , Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
COill~CILMAN BROWN MOVED , FOR CLARIFICATION PURPOSES , THAT THE CITY
PAY ONLY FOR THE MULTIPHASIC PHYSICAL EXAMINATION FOR EACH COUNCIL MEMBER .
Councilman Williams seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll, the v ote
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown, Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent : Council Members Mann , Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
CO UNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO HEAR MRS . W. W. KELLY UNDER THE PRE -
SCHEDULED VISITOR SEC TION OF THE AGENDA AT THIS TI~ffi . Councilman Brown
seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Co uncil Members Williams , So vern, Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent: Council Members Mann, Clayton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Mrs . W. W. Kelly , 3159 South University , appeared and stated that
the average taxpayer does not realize how much his taxes are until he receives
his bill . She also stated that increased assessments do not necessarily cause
higher taxes .
Mrs. Kelly stated that there are many people who appreciate the
work of City Council , and she commended Councilman Brown for yielding to
the wishes of the people .
* * * * * *
'
•
,_
•.
I • •
0
•
•
•
•
•
December 1 , 1976
Page 5
received :
Mayor Protem Clayton arrived at the meeting at 8 :10 p .m.
******
"Communications -No Action Recommended " on the agenda were
a . Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting
of November 9 , 1976 .
b . Minutes of the Library Board meeting of November 9 , 1976 .
c . Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commiss i on meeting of
November 11 , 1976 .
d . Minutes of the City of Englewood Retirement Board meeting
o f No vember 12 , 1976 .
e . Minutes of the Career Service Board meeting of November 23 ,
1976 .
f . Memorandum from the Director of Parks and Recreation t o
the City Manager concerning attendance at the 1976
National Congress for Recreation and Parks .
g . Letter from the Municipal Finance Officers Association
t o the Director of Finance concerning the An nual Financial
Report of the City of Englewood for the fiscal year ended
December 31 , 1976 .
May o r Taylor noted that there is a vacancy on the Library Board
and the Retirement Board which need to be filled before the end of the year .
Concerning agenda item 3g , Councilman Smith noted that the
Municipal Finance Officers Association has highly commended the City
for its high standard of finan cial reporting .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a list of twenty -two liquor licenses
that need to be renewed and a memo randum from the Chief o f Police concerning
re lated police calls over the past year. Those liquor licenses to be renewed
are:
Zimmermans
Holly South
Hampden West
Golden Fiddle
Hilda 's Cafe
Snow's Lounge
Casual Lounge
Belleview Bowl
Bar Harbor
BJ 's In
27 96 South Broadway
3535 South Huron
3517 South Elati
3370 South Acoma
4386 South Broadway
2tl93 South Broadway
65 West Floyd
4900 South Federal
3484 South Broadway
3467 South Broadway
'
•
,_
• .
• •
0
. I
•
•
•
•
,. -
December 7 , 1976
Page 6
VFW
Knights of Columbus
Eagles
Elks
Thorobred Liquors
Supreme Liquors
Old Town Liquors
Englewood Liquors
Glass Bottle Liquors
MD Pharmacy
Drug Fair
Se ven Eleven
3860 South Jason
3800 South Windermere
3384 South Broadway
3690 South Jason
5050 Sou th Federal
511 2 South Broadway
325 East Jefferson
3434 South Bro adway
336 West Hampden
2895 South Broadway
4204 South Broadway
4400 South Broadway
Attorney Richard C. Landrum representing Wi lliam G"lmore and
Rodney Utz , owner s of The John , 90 West Belleview; Arthur Snow , owner of
Snow 's Lounge , 28 93 So uth Broadway; and Maurice Soliman , owner of Bar
Harbor , 3484 South Broadway , were present t o answer Coun ci l 's questi ons
c oncerning p olice calls t o their establishments .
COUNCILMAN SO VERN MOVED TO RENEW THE LIQUOR LICENSES AS LISTED .
Councilman Smith seconded the moti on . Upon a call o f the roll , the vote
resulted as f ollows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Br own, Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
Ass i stant Ci ty Manager Nollenberger presented a recommendati on from
the Water and Sewer Board that City Council approve Supplement #52 to the
Southgate Sanitation District c onnector agreement. He explained that this
is a 13 .42 acre tract in Greenwood Plaza , an industrial park in Greenw ood
Vi llage located at Orchard and I -2 5 . He stated that only 8 .8 acres will be
developed and that usage would equate t o residential .
COUNCI LMAN SOVERN MOVED TO APPROVE SUPPLEMENT #5 2 TO SOUTHGATE
SANITATI ON DISTRICT CONNECTOR AGREEMENT . Co uncilman Clayton seconded the
motion . Upon a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as f ollows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams, Severn, Smith , Brown , Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent : Co unci l Member Mann.
The Mayor declare d the motion carried .
******
,_
I • •
'
•
•
•
•
-
December 7 , 1976
Page 7
Assistant City Manager Nollenberger presented a recommendation
f r om the Water and Sewer Boar d that City Council approve a revision in the
Municipal Cod e to inc rease sewer construction inspection fees to $12 .50/hour
for weekdays and $18 .75/hour for after normal duty h ours, weeken ds an d
holidays . He explained that this increase is necessary in order to keep
this function self-supporting .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO REVISE THE
MUNICIPAL CODE (ORD INANCE NO . 5 , PARAGRAPH 1 , SERIES OF 1972, AND AMENDED
ORDIN ANCE NO . 1 , PARAGRAPH 1 , SERIES OF 1973) TO READ $12 .50/HOUR WEEKDAYS
AND $18 . 75/HOUR AFTER NORMAL DU'IT HOURS, WEEKENDS AND HOL IDAYS. Councilman
Se vern seconded the motion . Up on a call of the roll , the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Br own , Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays: None .
Absent : Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
II*****
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO RESCHEDULE THE PUBLIC HFARING TO CONSIDER
A HOTEL AND RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION FOR G.G.O., INC ., D/B/A
SIZZLER FAMILY STEAK HOUSE , 5151 SOUTH BROADWAY , FOR JANUARY 10 , 1977 AT
8 :00P .M. OR AS SO ON THEREAFTER AS THE APPLICANT CAN BE HEARD . Co uncilman
Brown sec onded the motion . Upon a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as
follows :
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Severn , Smith , Br own, Clayton ,
Taylo r .
Nays: None .
Absent: Counc il Member Mann .
The May o r declared the motion carried.
II II II II II II
City Manager McCown requested that agenda items 4e , memorandum
concerning an encroachment agreement for Plaza de Medic o located in the
3500 block of South Washington, and 4f , memorandum concerning a gas service
easement for the gas distr ibution system at the Bi-City Wastewater Treat-
ment Plant, be withdrawn from the agenda to allow for further review before
presentation to City Council .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO WITHDRAW AGENDA ITEMS 4e AND 4f UNTIL
THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON DECEMBER 20 , 1976 . Councilman Clayton seconded
the motion . Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
• ·' I !
'!
"
I • •
'
-
•
•
Decemb e r 7 , 1976
Page 8
•
-I •
Aye s : Co uncil Members Williams , So vern , Smith , Brovn, Clayton,
Taylor .
Nay s : None .
Absent : Counc i l Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the moti on carried .
* * * * * *
D~TRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNC ILMEN MANN AND WILLIAMS
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO . 60
SERIES OF 1976
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2(c), CHAPTER 6 , TITLE XIII , OF THE 1969
ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE , RELATING TO COLLATERAL SECURITIES ON BANKS HOLDING
CITY CASH DEPOSITS .
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED TO PASS ORD I NANCE NO . 60 , SERIES OF 1976 ,
ON FINAL READING . Councilman Sove rn seconded the motion . Upon a call o f the
r oll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Counc il Members Williams , Sovern , Smith, Brown , Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent : Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the moti on carried .
* * * * * *
INTR ODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN CLAYTON
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 12 AND 13 , CHAPTER 3 , TITLE XV , ARTICLE II ,
OF THE 1969 ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE , AUTHORIZING THE OPTIONAL USE OF
SCHEDULED FLAT RATE OR MEASURED METERED SERVICE FOR RESIDENTIAL WATER
USAGE WITHIN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD .
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED TO PASS ON FIRST READING A BILL FOR AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 12 AND 13 , CHAPTER 3 , TITLE XV , ARTICLE II , OF
THE 1969 ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE , AUTHORIZING THE OPTIONAL USE OF SCHEDULED
FLAT RATE OR MEASURED METERED SERVICE FOR RESIDENTIAL WATER USAGE WITHIN THE
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . Councilman Williams seconded the motion .
City Attorney Berardini explained that this Bill provides for
ne w residential water customers t o choose between flat or metered service
and f or existing customers to change from metered t o flat rate service .
•
/fl -
'
I • •
. I f
-
-
•
•
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 9
•
• •
Mr . Berardini added that c ontrol would c ome from rules and regulations t o
be established by the Water and Sewer Bo ard .
Councilman Se vern stated that he f eels this is poor timing because
o f the upcoming water improvement program . He stated that metered service
is more fair because the customer pays only for the amount of water used and
because meters cut do wn on overall water waste.
May o r Taylor noted that water is our most preci ous commodity and
that the waste of treated water mu st be stopped. He added that thi s is
possible through metering .
Councilman Smith stated that this motion is premature because o f
the upc omin g water s tudy .
Councilman Clayton s tated that this is a matter o f fairness and
equal rights f or the water user .
Upon a call o f the r oll , the vote resulted as f ollows :
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Clayton .
Nays: Council Members Severn, Smith, Brown , Taylor .
Absent : Counc il Member Mann .
The May o r declared the moti on defeated.
* * * * * *
RESO LUTI ON NO. 62 , SERIES OF 1976
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF ENCORE , INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE
CORPORATION , D/B/A THE SOUTH DOOR, FOR A RETAIL 3 .2% BEVERAGE LICENSE FOR
CONSUMPTIO N ON THE PREMISES OF THE LICENSEE, TO BE LOC ATED AT 5470 SOUTH
BROADWAY , ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO .
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO . 62 , SERIES OF 1976 .
Councilman Williams seconded the motion . Upon a call of the r oll , the vote
resulted as follows :
Ayes: Counc i l Membe rs Will iams, Severn, Smith , Brown, Clayton ,
Taylor •
Nays: None .
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
'
• ·' ·.' ' r
'!'
I
• .
• •
0
'32xl
•
•
•
•
..
December 7 , 1976
Page 10
RESOLUTION NO . 63 , SERIES OF 1976
A RESOLUTIO N APPOINTING JOHN A. CRISWELL , ATTORNEY AT LAW , 3780 SOUTH BROADWAY ,
ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO , AS SPECIAL COUNSEL IN LITIGATION TO BE COMMENCED TO
DETERMINE THE VALIDITY OF A CERTAIN SAND AND GRA~L LEASE ENCUMBERING CITY
PROPERTY CURRENTLY HELD BY MOTOR CRANE SER VICE COMPANY , A COLORADO CORPORATION .
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO . 63 , SERIES OF
1976 . Co uncilman Smith seconded the motio n . Upon a call o f the r oll , the
vote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Counc i l Member s William s , Sove r n, Sm ith , Brown , Clayton,
Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent : Co uncil Member Mann .
The May or declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
CO UNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED TO REQUEST THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PRESENT
A WRITTEN REPORT CONCERNING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HARDSHIP CAS ES AT THE FIRST
CITY COUNCIL MEETING IN JANUARY . Councilma n Sovern seconded t he mot i on .
Up on a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Wi lliams , Sovern , Smith , Br own, Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent : Co uncil Member Mann .
The May or declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
City Atto r ney Berardi ni presented a b r ief r e p o r t co n cer ning two
law s u its filed against the State of Colorado regard i ng the Police and Fire
Pension Funds .
Councilman So vern suggested that the City Atto rney and City
Manager 's office prepare a p ress rel ease requesting o ther municipalities
and special districts to join in these suits .
* * * * * *
May or Taylor declared a recess at 9 :10p .m. Council reconvened
at 9 :25 p .m. Upon a call of the r oll , the following were present:
Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Br own, Clayton , Taylor.
• ·. . , \ !
~
I • •
f
-
•
•
•
December 7, 1976
Page 11
Absent: Council Member Mann .
•
•
The Mayor declared a quorum present .
******
, .
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum concerning the senior
center name memorialization .
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED 'IO POSTPONE THIS ITEM UNTIL THE CITY
COUNCIL MEETING ON JANUARY 3 , 1977 , AND THAT THE CITY STAFF ARRANGE A STUDY
SESSION WITH THE ENGLEWOOD CENTENNIAL -BICENTENNIAL FOUNDATION . Councilman
Brown seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as
follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays: None .
Absent : Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the Assistant City
Manager concerning the "Englewood Citizen" newsletter . This newsletter has
been published monthly since June of 1976 , and Mr . McCown requested Council 's
direction for 1977 publications . He noted that it is an annual expenditure
of approximately $24 ,000 to publish this newsletter every month .
After discussion , Council decided t o take a poll in February to
receive feedback from the citizens .
******
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the Director of
Finance concerning a status report on the River Development Project . He
noted that additional funds may be needed for this project because settlement
costs for the land are running higher than expected .
******
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the Director of
Finance concerning changes in the State Liquor Code . He stated that the
state has a new Class A classification entitled "tavern license" and that
the state has changed the effective date of liquor licenses from the calendar
year to the anniversary date .
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED TO REQUEST THE CITY ATTORNEY 'IQ PREPARE
AN ORDIIIANCE RE.'VISING THE ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE TO CORRESPOND WITH THESE
CHANGES IN THE STATE LIQUOR CODE . Councilman Smith seconded the motion,
Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows :
. --•
;-
.• I !
'!
..
I • •
0
.......
•
•
•
•
0 ..
December 7 , 1976
Page 12
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Severn, Smith, Brown , Clayton,
Taylor .
Nays: None.
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the Assistant City
Manager concerning the establishment of a Sewer Fund Construction Account
for additional funds from the 1971 E.P .A. Rehabilitation Grant in the amount
of $235 ,000 . He recommended that such an account be established for future
capital outlay towards future expansion of the Bi-City Treatment Plant. He
also noted that this account would be used to make up o r receive any differences
between sewer tap fees received and expenditures for debt retirement , capital
construction and front -end operating costs of the new facility .
Councilman Smith suggested that this money be invested and that
any withdrawals be made at budget time .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO SET UP A SEWER FUND CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT .
Councilman Se vern seconded the motion .
Councilman Clayton stated that restrictions should be established
f or this account .
Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Counc i l Me mber s Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Taylor .
Nays : Council Me mb er Clayton .
Absent : Counc i l Memb er Mann .
The Mayor declar ed the mot i on c a rri ed .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum concerning proposed
revisions t o the State Water Quality Criteria and Stream Classification
System by the Colorado Water Quality Control Commission . He noted that a
letter will be sent to the Commission stating Council 's comments and/or
recommend ations based on the study session discussion .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown noted that there will be a luncheon meeting
with City Council and the Housing Authority on December 15 , 1976 at 11:30
a .m. followed by a topping-off ceremony for the Englewood housing project .
* * * * * *
•
'
I • •
. , '
-
•
•
•
•
0
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 13
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED TO HAVE A DINNER MEETING WITH THE PARKS
AND RECREATION COMMISSI ON ON JANUARY 20 , 1971 AT 6:00P .M. Coun c ilman Brown
seco nded the motion . Up on a cal l o f the r ol l , the vote resulted as f ollows:
Taylo r .
Ayes: Co unci l !~embers Wi lliams , Se vern , Smith , Brown, Clayton ,
Nays: None .
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carr ied .
******
City Manager McCown presented a letter from the Chamber of Commerce
requesting City Co uncil 's desires f or h olding meetings of the Arapahoe Mayor 's
Council.
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO HOLD MONTHLY MEETINGS . The motion died
for lack of a second .
COUNCILMAN BROWN MOVED TO HOLD MEETINGS EVERY OTHER MONTH . Council-
man Clayton seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted
as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
William Anderson , 4981 South Washington , appeared and addressed
Council on several matters of concern . Among his comments , Mr . Anderson
expressed his opinions as follows: the City needs better police p r otection ;
the gutters should be cleared of leaves ; Clarkson needs to be patched ;
s uggested an amusement tax on golfers; beer should be allowed in the parks;
informati on in the "Englewo od Citizen" should be published earlier; outside
sewer cust omers should be charged higher rates; in favor of a bond issue
t o improve water pressure but not t o provide water to outside districts;
and that the mistakes involved with c o nstruction of the Senior Citizens
Center shou l d be at the expense o f the engineer or the architect.
******
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE A
RESOLUTION FOR SALARY ADJUSTMENTS FOR THE CITY ATTORNEY AND CITY MANAGER
TO BE PRESENTED AT THE COUNCIL MEETING ON DECEMBER 20, 1976 . Councilman
Severn seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as
follows:
. ...... •
,_
• •
. ,
-
•
•
December 7 , 1976
Page 14
•
• •
Ayes : Council Membe r s Williams, Severn, Smith, Br own, Clayton ,
Taylor .
Nays : None .
Absent : Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
Mayor Taylor adjourned the City Council meeting at 10 :30 p .m.
City Clerk
'
• .
'
I • •
0
. ,
-
, I
•
•
•
•
•
·. •
APPLICANT:
COUNCIL ACTION REQUEST
LIQUOR AND ).2 BEER OUTLETS
Edward E Cordova and Paule te M Cordova
dba Englewood liquors
3434 S Broadway
TYPE OF ACTION REQ ESTED:
2 A
Issuance of Retail liquor Store licen se due to the change of ownership
from Golda B Marshall, James l. Girard ot, and Mary lou Girardot to Mr and Mrs Cordova
POL I CE AND FBI REPORTS:
Enclosed
PREVIOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTI ONS DURING PRIOR TWO YEARs ,
EXCWDING ANNUAL RENEWAL:
None
CITY ATTORNEY'S REVIEW:
COMMENTS:
'
,_
•.
I . •
0
· . f . ,
•
•
,._ •
•
ImrrE;-a.ty
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPA
•
DRL 404 (REV. 5/76)
STATE OF COLORADO
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
APPLICATI O N FOR A LIQUOR LICENSE
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE FILED WITH THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REV·
ENUE, STATE CAPITO L ANNE X BUILD ING, 1375 SHERMAN STREET, DENVER .
COLORADO 8 0203, 1303) 892-3 741 . NO LICENSE WI LL BE GRANTED UNTI L THE
APPLICATION HAS BEEN APPROVE D BY THE LOCAL LICENSI NG AUTHORITY.
IMPORTANT: CHECK THE APPROPR IATE BO X FOR THE TYPF OF LIC ENSE (S) BEING APP LIED FO R THI S IS AN ORI GI NAL 4PP LIC AT10 N
AN D A COPY MUST BE KEPT IN YOUR FILES FOR REFE RENC E WH EN 4PP LY IN G FOR ~EN E W4 L L IC ENSE S
0 RETA IL LIQUOR STORE LICE NSE -CltV
0 RETA IL LIQUOR STORE LICENSE -CountY
0 LIQUOR LICENSED DRUG STORE -Cl tV 0 LIOUOA LICENSED DRUG STORE -County
0 BEER & WINE LICENSE-C itY
0 BEER & WINE LICENSE -CountY 0 CLUB LICENSE
$ 117 50
• 252.110
$ 117.50
• 262 60
• 162.50
$ 237 .~0
• 110.00
0 W I NERY LIC ENSE ($10,000 Bo,;d Required)
0 WHOLESALE BEER LICENSE '
0 WHOLE S ALE LI QUOR LICENSE ($10,000 Bond lhq.)
0 DISTILLERY LICENSE ($10,000 8ond A~u lr •d )
0 RECTIFIER LICENSE (110,000 lond l'loqul_,)
0 IMPORTER 'S LICENSE
0 BREWERY (BEER) LICENSE
• 250.00
$ 500.00
$1000.00
$1000 00
$1000.00
• 250.00
0 HOTEL & RESTAURANT LICENSE -C ity & Countv 0 TAVERN LIC ENSE -CitY & CountY
• 301 25
' 301.25
0 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION LI CENSE Ooch
• 250.00
• 25.00
0 RACE TRACK LICENSE
0 ARTS LICENSE
30 1 25 s 11 0 .00
(Pla n e, bu1, c o r)
• May R~q uir~ Bond
THE UNDERSIGNED HER EBY MAKES I.PPLICAT ION FOR A ST4TE LICENSE AS INDIC4 TEO ABO VE , UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF TITLE 12,
ART ICLE ~7, C RS 1973, I.ND FOR THAT P U RPO SE MAKES TH E F OLLOWING ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS CONTAINED IN THIS APP LICA•
TION. EVERY APPLICABL E QUESTION MUST BE ANSWERED . ANY FALSE A NSWER OR STATEMENT MADE BY THE APPLICANT CONSTI·
TUTES PERJURY AND THE PERSON MAKING SUCH F"LSE STI.TE MENT S UBJECTS I.NY LICENSE ISSU ED HEREIN TO REVOCATION.
J . .......... of pl-. to b. lan..d: fXACT LOCAlK>f!4 0¥ PIEMISfS MUST IE GIVEN . Giw \treet and number, where po11 ible . If ,..Ieee to be l1cenMd
II ._..., in a ~ or f'WM 6tfic:l ........ It 5I impGNlb'-to ~ve atr" t and number . the lot and block number or ~r l of .e<tton wh.re lo<ated must
.. .-. ...... $.. . .tl -t. . .f/ ... -.... S:. .. 8.1.e!N'9 .D.w A: y ......... .
•. o1y .. r..:..::i...;,(;~~:"w~~~ ................ ?Q// 0 ·'"""ly fl. te R ,P ~ H 0£ • Color.do
Zip Code
-·-. ,..._ .. 5..1:1. ~.f .... fi:, .. fJ&.Om!.tvA.y ;1 · Etv£;'..t....£. tuo CJ P-,. CE D ... .. z;p c oc~o 8-' 0 I I '()
5 . 0o.,... ,_."'-"' _..., ..1 the,......._ f• w!ltct. tn;. a.,..t,u""" '"' toc.n .. '6.~.411.1~ .t~~.J 1/.JII..l-/Ait..f(. J.l.199 ,
6. Ale .... ---.. --RE .~.r p..Jj If ron'-<! ......... whom? c. t... Rv /) E --r; f.l ~fj f!j E_ yes
... No
t . Nee tht .,.reM~. 01 My of tt... ~. 01 1ftY of the offkeA. ttod ho«Mn Of d 1r.ctor• of Ntd' appltc~t (tf it " • cOfpor•
tion) evH ....._ conwfcted of • ..._.., Wt ttw State of Colorado 01 .,..n con-..tct.d ol a cr ttN .......... ,. whktt ...ovld CONI1Me
a l•i<ony II aud\ .,._ hod --'"-" In tho $tao. ..1 CoiO<oclo ? II >O. tllfa full •••do
Ia)-...W • -...,., tnlo liQ-lOw? ....
ll>l ha4.., -k ---, .. ........, .. rovobd?
II ,._ --Ia ,.._ ••ploin fully l ... oclo _ ... ahHI, II --)
11 . Ar• -,_ ... -1-vndor lhe $1o1a l•q-Law oo 1ho 8••• Code 1 y C S
State l.c.Me N"',..._' .........
•
Yn ·-·····-·-No
Yet .... -........ . No .... ~
y"'''''''"""'" No ... ~
If to, to whoM 4 the lfceftM it•wd?
..
I • •
·'
I
'!
-
•
•
•
,_ •
• •
v--No ...
t 4 . Ooet •ny ,.,.._., finn • cerpor..U. haw • fNMfel ;.....,..,, evkieftced e 1ther by ~ ,_ .qvfty owne~l p .n ..._ but"'"'
few which tt\it IQme it ,....tltCf? tf ~ entwef' &a .,..., alate names M~ eddretMt " •l'ftOUnt of tuch ftnanciel infltt'"t ~ ea"""Md e i!Mr tn don.n 01 ~ JteMe of val~.~a, •u<h •• 1nwt1tory, fvrnit'ut"e , fhtturea .nd eqv i ~t Y" .. ....... No .......... .
-
... ,. O>ilep .... -.;,y .. --,? If .... -Is I'M· ••ploln ........ ;······· ............. . ·•···· .......................................... No -~
17. Do --~~~ ~--~··:::·=··~:.;· ~·;;:.· ,...:;~: .. ~=·~~-~ ·;::::;~ .... ~~·~:·:·: ...... NO ... 1?.1~ .. ~~: -~~~-~~:::·::.::::: .. :·~:~: ... :· ·:::
II. ..... you 0t clo -~ o lo9Joto_, ,._,_., In tt. Sloto of Coloroclo? YU... ... NOL.--.:. If TIS. LICfN$f -............................... .. .•.
City (Ooto of llirth)
If --of ... but"-• lo -... IJIP!Iconl .... _ (b)
(b) ...... •• -1 . ..•.... ·-··I • --"'-'-Clly (Ooto of ...... ,
20. IF THE APPLICANT IS A. PARTNERSHI P , antwer (a), (bl . •no (t),
(b~ ................... .. _of ,..._
(c) -did Nld po"""rohlp -dolne but"-' ond ovbmll • copy of po,.,...lp •-nt?
--"lp,)
21 . IF THE APPLICANT IS A CO"ti'OIItA TION, anlwer (•), (b). (C), CO), (a) and (f)
_,
City
(o) o.v-n1..d ...;.. tt. 1._ of .... Stoto of....... .. ............... .. ················-··········-···················' o-................................................. ..
(b) Pr;nc;pol butlnMa lo condvctod ot ..... . .......... ... .. ...... .. • ..... Covn!y of ......................................... , $tole of
(d Dale of fitint l•t annwl eorpotatw reoorf to the Secretary of SfatL ...... .
I d) --Add .... City
. ''" .. "' ·I
_ .... Via--,retkfent.
.· ..... Tre .. urer • --.. ···--·-•· • .. • ... -· I •
:>ate of Birth
Morlt+., Oey, Year
.... , ... -.. -·
I ..
tel lttt eH ttockholdert ownl"9 or c.onho'hng 10% or ""ore of "'-Cepit el Stod of ttw Corpotahon. (lnc:h.~de· Ktuel owner or pl.edgM). UM MfHrete
thHt if ""ded .
... om. StrHt No •nd City
•••• J
. I • I
I •
(f) List All OlrectOf''•-Name Hom• -Addreu
oo l
'
'•run' of
Stodr. Ownod
City
Oer. of l •rtft
Month, o.,. ~ •• ,
1 -·------·-·-Oat• of 81rtn
Montn . Dey, VNr
... ;
. '
I • •
0
•
•
•
,. -•
-
...
If nus A'"-lCAllOflf tl POl A CUll U~ LICINII, ANSWEI QUI!$TK)NS 25 THttOUGH 32. ~ t
. ~
. ~ .
A dub .,.,,. • corporatfo-. whk" ftM bee1t iftC'Oirportted fCM' not lMt tt._. five ye.,.., •Ad which Mt Ncf • ,,..,.,..,thip 1hef.-......_ pekf duet fot •
-iod of ot IMot flw .,....., ..... -"'<h. for itYO ... ,.. h .. been tho _.,.,, lo-. or cxcoponl of on "''•bt""-· 9'*~ oololy f<l< ot.jecta of --··
aoc;.t, fr~.~irlattC;·"itk.al. ,Ot tthletic n.ture, bot not for peo~n i ...y eeln. tnd tNt p1opertl'• M well n .._ .......... el _... ...... te ............
Aloo. o cWb~lf. c~·-whkh Ito rovulor ly _,ored brmch., lodgo "'...._of o -;onotcwpn-. oo:hlcb_"'" ~-...toly for ....
~··~~~-01 ·'!~ ~lht;on"' .-;.tt. 11<n not ,., _...,.,Y..;... \ . ,.
25. ;'Sft'N /•~ ,.q ft',;c:ar;{ ~ offloon of ..,d •ppii<Ml -tho< witll ""' office hole by Hd\ of .-.1 ,..,._,
. -: . I"' --• • ,;;;.... a..w-..
,,~' ;,~:: __ ~,7:..!. . .".~ .. ~~,l~ .. /:.~l : oo ,,,_, ... _ ••• ::, o .oHo-•·••-••
. i . ··... _:>p"..._ /
........ ::· ·~~~~~-·····
uooo ·-........... ~ •••.•••• :0...--.J
....... --·-····-······1 .......... :.J .••.•• .-....... ·····-·····-.. . .. . ··-··-···1 ........ __ :. .. _ ........... ······-· ...... .
MAMAGfl .... t '
...... ·····-· --···--·-·-·-·-···· ........ ..! ...,
.. .. --of"""
......... _ .. -::: .............. ; --···'-·-.. -·· ................... .
l .. . . ............... ............................ ~ .... ...; ,, __ ,,,.... ............. -·-···-·· ......... -..
. ; -.... ................. ............. ..... ---·:·t<o~ .... -1 .......... ~-........ · ..... .. . . .
27. Is the ~icel"t ~tion ~.,... •oWv. for • n~l . tociel. ft•Nrnel, ~iotl c. pelitke4 .,. ettHtic ~ .. Mit for ~ ... n?
__ ... ,. , .. _, __ ..
.. ~f ..................... . ' .
:•···---·-"
3 t. Stete how IOtWJ eppUt-"t h•• ac<~ utd P'•m''" to tM lkens.ed u • dub
' · .
'
I • •
·' '
-
•
•
•
•
•
II. _ .. ,_~.,!*'---thio-? Dote ... ·-··--·······
: .. ·;, . .. ······· ··-···-··-~·-·..._.. __ _ ________ .,. ··-· -·--... ~ ........... .
1P TMI~ A"'tiCATIOfl IS 1'011 ... CUM U~ L-=-. "'NSWU QUeSTIONS 1S fWIIOOGii 32. I
A dvb --t <Otpoot~Oft -..., been 1-po<tted IO< not leM "'"" live ~.,.. ond whidl "-• ·-o ~p ,,......._ pold "'-for o
petted of at'"'' f.._~. 4ft~~~~, far f 1V<e p•r•, tl," bee n the ow,..,, '-"'"• or oc:~upent of.., ftfebH.tw.,.."'':,..,.~ tolely ... ~of Mt~.
toc:'-1, fr •~ • ...,.trlotlc, .. UtiCaJ, !JI et+t .. tic neture, ~t not f~ pecvn•.,-y e•m. •nd the property. ft well " ............... .I whictt M .... to .........,.,,
Aloo, o cWL''-"'ilr. (;~~ who<h Ia o r-vul.,ly -torod br..,... .. lodvo "'~oft -IONI --·"""ct."-,..,-..,loly for lho ~•0!,;):-~0t ·e,~ t<gonllt,_ • _, ~""'I"' -'"Y _.;,.. , , _
.. ..., / ~ ... /_ ~ ~, l
25. ;W'"N .. ~~~ (ft~~ pt~ oflloon of ,..;d ppliaonl --with lho olfice ~ by ooci> of Mild _...,., . ~ .. ..., --... ,,-~:.-:t:.-~,L...::..~,-
.......... -~-I/-;/::;-·;{"~/
_-.: .. !.--··< -.
-~ ............ . -
·-.
,_
J
·t • ,p.t!o .. -
.......... .: .••..••• .;.. ...... J
. . -··-· ·~ .... _,., ... ; ....... ····~-···-;··~·····
•····:.·· ... ··· .......... -...... __ ....... , ······----··-···········
I <I;~;., \ -···-····--·····-...... -............... _ ......... -..~ ....... ,. .... : ............... ____ ,.,, ..
·, ty
·-.......... , ............. ;
.......................... -.................. ; ................................................. .
............... ..... .. ....................... :.,.ft .............. _, ......... · .......................... ..
27
. '
'' fhe eppt ic~t Otteftlulk:wl a,terMe4 ·~ for a n.-tLonal. •oc ••t fr•M'n•l. patriotic, poUtkat • •thtetic ~ ..-M Mit for ~ .. tn?
...... ····-···,-, __ ..
' ------· . ..__ ..
., ... ' L .. ,. ...... . '
"·:· ........ 1 ............... ..
•
I • •
-
•
•
•
.. -•
-
• ~ ...... ~.. .. ) l' "\
IF THI! APPL f ~I~~\WFAC'TOA!R OR WHO~!: A~A . AN$W6R QUESTIONS 33 Tt!AOUGH ~
('• ~
.. ..... ........... ~ .... _....., _..._ ..... H.oNooL ......... ~ .• ~ ... . .. ·-: ........... -.... -.......... ----·--·---................ ..
k ..... ...,._ --.. --.................. -· ~ .. ._,.,.. ... '" .....__. .... : ..................... _ ·-;-................. .
If ... -fUll ............. ......_ ___ .....: ......... _: ... _______ .:."'... :!.'~ ..... , .... 0 '"'"''--·-.................... ::, ........... ~---.... -................... .
.... --··-·· .. •--.. ···-· ----·""--•·•!...:::~-~,....:.:.~~· . .::_.~----··-----·····..-. . .': ... ~ ........ -~-.. ~-..... -:...::r._··-•-f••······..,-·-ro•....;.,-.................... ~.:.. •• _·-··--···-·······-
15. 0..-.. floe~ :0,'~'.1 .. ~-.. ...., .,, __ •·a.-,_;_,fA""' ........ ~.r.-..... -...... •, . ..) . . .. ....... ..... .., ~ ... ~""""""' ... _"" ........ ~ .. Mlllfttt -"· •lfool!ot .. lP'''-''-~ ... ~":•.:, .. : .. 'l'oo..~.. ..... :···· ............. ..
II 0..-...... tr-.. ..., woy _..., 1ro...., ....... -·· ...._,, • dlotllle<y, or....,."" .. W.. otl....._
-.-.e~~~oor......, .... ,..,.., ............... __ .... ~.,.......,;.. .. " _ _.,_~ ... ~··-.
"-........... ....,_ ............ .....;_, ________ .-...... -.. "· ............... ,-............................. ~1""' ·-·~·~ ........ ~ ... :_. No .. .
u . -""Y -·""" _,~~ •·-.,....,--fl4"' .. , ...,., ~-"'•-•· ;,.;m.,;: ·...... ·
"--~--~ ~--......_ "-'doo -· ift h -fo< wll!<h ~ ~tloft '-(.....,..to .... t If ....... ,..nlcviOf
~: .. ·~:·=·~~rlr::=~~~:~-~~:·=~~::~· .. :::.:.~:~ .... :~ ... ·~-:~:·.~.::~.:·.·--~~-~:: ... :.~:~·:-~.-.. ~~:::~~~~ .. -=.::::· .. ::::·.:
3t. ,.,. ro•IM,.... ~~ '" 111e u.s. 1 --·---'"-----·--··----··---...::..-----~~--.. ·-·-·-····
I"-............... ~'Jiwil • .,__,_. ta t lrt ........._-.... __.., el ,..._.... -·lrt ~I • :. .., •. :" ·a. ~At·~.~· r }.:. 'd 1 ' :-·;_ ,·li-'~ • ~M;41J/~:::·~-:::·::·~ .. ~{,-:~·~:;:;==:
,2" .. 1~ .. -1., ......... ~------.. -· _ _......, ____ _
• ~AND A .... OVA1. Of LOCAl.LICINW.O AuntOIIft :· . t,~,·
(MANUt'AC""".IItl, WI4Q~RS, IMI'OA TIERS AND PUeLo C TlltA N~'ITAYION SVATIE....V.SA&tl~Rb THIS -tONI . r
1M lor.,. OIIPicotiOI'I ,_been •1111miMd met the.,...,; .. , bull-~ and charoe101' of the -llelnt llootilfloctcwy, and wado '"""'
tMt tuch llcenM, tf Orllf'lud, will-the ,....,... requl-tl of the '*thborhood ttfld t he desir• of t he l ~to. end_,...... with the pn>VIsiot
of Ti tle 12, M .... 41, CFI81f71.
ntHffOII! TH IS NIPUCATIC»> • .._.,.~ .
OATIO Af;__-------'IMI'L----OAY Of--------/lo.I:J. It'---------
~ 0P TDWM . CITY a. ~~~------------------~--------------------------~---------
CMAYOI 011 OIAIIMAN Of IIOMO Of COUNTY COMMIWOHEU 01 OJHH lllU Of UCfHSIMG AUIIIOIIITY.)
ATT!STo
IOIItk 011 $KIETAIIY 011 OTHI!t OffiClt HAVING THE OffiCIA~ SlA~ Of Tltf ~ICIHSING AUTH()l!TY I
(If "-,.,...._ .. .....,_ ·-• -or dty, "-.-. ·-•1 shovlcl llo tlgnod 1rt ""' .... ,or ..,d .-.. II "' • ,_,_ -1rt tho """"""
el "-llloo•d of .-y _ .. -., ond .... deft, to tho """"' If, 1rt .,.,.,._ or -··-· tho local 1-"'e .......,,.., ;. --· official , tho•
""" _ .... "--ee lie flw• loy tu<l\ ofhdol)
•
.• I !
'!
I •
'
..,.. ·".
•
•
•
•
0
•
.,.ATE OF COLORADO • DEPARTMENT Of filE VENUE
LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION ADOENOWI
To .......... by -lnclwldwel. ~tp, or corporation Wquor llconwo. NO l iquor ltc.w ..-1011111111
~ ....... Ail ........... •~v •••-· Any FALSE • .,._ or-........ _....,,_
...,_ ,.IUUrt, _, .. --ina a.ch 1-.st•-aubjeetlan y ltc.w illued lwM\ to.llllllalla
1. ,....,..,_, £.PwfoRD CR dr RSr ~R Dov.g
a. .,_._.u ""' .,,, E «<!6 .. £ woo D L 1 ,., "n .<? s
l Mheofl! '"1 _,, :J13,;.J f?r?q,P<Pay,. lJ4 tv"C!") <" 0 ftc? II 0
.. u.-u...-.:
I. .,..,.. ....... ,.......,of the...,_ _ .... 1 --':1.41_c-. ... s~.-_______ _
-~ I .. -.. ........, _.... .. -lld7 =-~r--~-;...tj/V"'""-r-"-:-!-'=--~.,4~.,...._,,.,.....,...,....---..... -,...,..=---l!l-ch"'O '-.e::>.-9t;~tu ·J..Lu9m TP ,/J,qt;9E
J ................ 0 4&!!D F XJ /j &~F
........ _ .... .._: lO ge• t fU Expltallondlleo:;'>O Ng .. •. 71
.... ,..._,,.....,.,..,......_... ..... I ... (mher,III01her, bro!N< ..... ch ....... l ...........
.._._...,.._I._. or In any-atlon tho! holdoallquor ....,_1 .,. ,........ .,...
....... _equlty,lll-or '-.1 lf-rloyoa.explelnlnd11811. 0 Y• J11 Me
.............. 1'1-tlfya.~~-lov-:
tO. m.t _...,.., ftml or -lllan '-a nn.ncW'-1 In your ~1 0 Y• ~ No
II. K .__II--.. "-· one! the~ of the poroon holding .,.h flnoncl•lln-., N ._ --of .... fv..cill ... _,
t2. ....... ~ .. .,...."-t In tile"'*'-" --lltt-t.Wt~~~£t:,..·-"OU..I.O.t.;O;,:, • ...J..Qio-Ow.... _______ _
d. ,._....,-.hlp the-._ will rwpreent : -~/u.:,C-'Q~/':;..,._t),-----------
14. .tn yau-Mctlw peotlctp.,tln the mani'JO'ncnt and Optrltton of your ~ ~
ov. ~-
tl. K........., elll will _,.,. your n tlbllthment. ~lw """"'· addms, dotlt of birth of the MANAGE II. lftd
11111111t-of the .. ...,.._,t ~t" will> til ls quenlonotire :
tl. Old yau -Into • .. .......,.,, .. Lone " egreement wflh your "'""11911' or any other -7
0 Y• ~ No. lithe -mentis In writing, att<tch a copy
'
,. .
'..~· 'J J'~ .:"
• .. ··: .. ~.:-
·""· • .. ~1 ~· ~·;-
•• t •• ;;:~ .....
.. ...,.,l ..•
.:. # '
• I
.. "
' .
' \.~.,,·1
··;·.
,. . .· ..
'· I • •
0
,
•
•
• •
,,.2...,......
'.
t7. ...,. .....,_ t.1o1 ar do v• hold..., flnonl:iolln-dintt ar _., "'OltY m.l-.,. --·
................................ -1 u v. 00 No lf .... pl .... ·
a .-..... ..,...., -_._ ..-ot•..,.ltolony arol ..,..._.t. by wlllc:h lilY-,.........,..
.......,., ... ....,..., .. ,..,fhar-...-ofll\itiNbiW.....t.llld ony .,._.......,. •
............. ............. Giflditi ..... ·-•-v II¥-. profit.-. gN"''"" .... --........
,......., ... ,..._ • ...,., .. .._.... .. ,.,bject lllooppllcotior> todonlol • • ....._
--. ,_., ....... .........., llltNI_.....,..... _.,,.. locomplno,uuollldo..-.
........... ~-Ti t!o
...._... ___ ..__ ....
g-1JI, .., .. _Z}.._...tt-'"'<,_lr..:.'""t/d.=i......_ _____ A.D., 19;...1.;;..f. __
..,_........, ~JL( /q 1 77 (. ?7 7 }
'
• .
'
· . . ,
•
City of Englewood , Colorado
Personal History for Licensing
License Applied For :
•
0 , .
•
. ! r:: -..
• 1 • ·-'
[ :~ 3 1975,
Liquor /3.2 B~:er ')( Recreation Facility _____ Health Therapy _____ Other _____ _
CEP1. -.. r .::,r :2E
SECTION I ENGLE\'1000
Na me U/11(7 !{ Social Security NO . .6:/9-{ f -%/'.! "<
Home Add ress_~-fL.-{L.j'IL..:I.,Z'l=:~/',f..I,~Lf....!L""O~/?~, .E.t~/V~fL.'.w.r_...JC.""'..:Juu.B.U''---!1 _ __..,.,;:::-"',P==:t :...f::...IV=-.r./<.,!,L'-"tC"--=:-:'&,=J_.(.LD.L-_ ___,;-;-::-"-K.l.I.0'-'2'-'-1..:.'--
Street City State Zip
Date of B irth __ .;...l_t/__.,1'--""//""i.""}:;:./_..:.,...:.1'--"'-2 .._/_ Place of Birth tlu ittim" ~ rt~·v,0 &C:«c T t(t!& t!~
Height " ' J '' We ight !£.[ a Color of Eyes /3£•• •''/V Color of Hair /)Ken·// Race~ Sex T-
Citizen ; U.S. X Other ______ Marital Status ; Married _ _,K'_,____Single ____ Oivorced ___ _
Jh J tS/JN.P
Name of ~se .or E~ ill81j9e _ __.r.,""'' "'-OLtY'-'fJc:...c.S .... P'--...L-..--"'&::7"'-"6?'-'b"-''"'-1 -"•'...<.d"------------------
--------------------------Age ____________ _
Parents ; Fathers Name E/tV i -;-J I K { v /V-t t 0 Mothers Name d/V l C ur{' I r E
Address ------=..i>::........{--"c_.,t.L-cl-'-"-r..._t__.J)"'--------Address ------"".I>'-'-__,_c...,tT'--''-'-I_..u! C...;...b=-------
Brothers /Sieteft;
Name f/7/h r<'l-VIVI~IS..i) Name -----------------
'/ r<? vc r' H t , ' (' <" :z ;J ,.... '" ~
Add ress .J7rvv fii{J.tqa S: .r 1' n,:t J,vc f Address ________________ _
Name Name ------------------
Ad dress Address ----------------
Employment Record-past 10 years
1. Employer 1/S'/f f( l?i/JSJ Y/ r:t/IY JJ .
Address tJep f n tV Lf o II. K 1
0 9 0/0 ,
2 . Employe r _______________ _
Address ----------------
'l. Employer-----------------
Address----------------
4 . Employer -----------------
Address------~---------------------
•
From fllre" { z /9£ 1 to ./) (.-c I 9 z..c=
Position held r I IYF' IV t ' I p~ AzB«a ', K
From to
Position held
From 0
Posttlon held
From 0
Pos ition held
'
.• \ !
~
I
•.
• •
f
• --0 I•
•
Addresses-past 5 years
From A47t ' ZL to ~ ,:c c F Street tl.t::..o . a.t:w l l fl.S. K. o 9r .tc City ;I; t/ 1 /V" State CE ti. !!: (.1 "" MOft1h ·Yea r
From .. !)/C 'Zl
Month · Ye ar
to IYll•'' 2.6. Street iiZ.-l ,£Q t_l(2 R,·Ii't~[ f'<J , rl c i ty /:) ,-~IL. e:~-&. State &"""' li!i
From to Street City State
Month · Year
Frorr. to Street City State
Month ·Year
From 0
Month · Year
Street City State
Have you ever been convicted of a fe lony or misdemeanor!exclude minor traffic violations) Yes __ No __
If yes give dates ,places ,nature of offense , penalty or punishment _________________ _
Character Re ferences : list T hree (3)
1. Name £(!CIA/
f'#'t<'l ,C76'V,[CN S
Address ~SZ !!1(, l J I L/ { .i? I( (?oro ,!o; cJ Y ,
3 . Name_~J.~z~6~t~tLI~N~-~~~Q~£~o~~~rw,~·~ae~----------------------------------
Add~ss ~Y~7~t'~V~LPV~·_c/~~uf~)l~r~r~/L~4e_v~-L~~L~~~L)~f~/V~t~-e~~~~~~?~~~~~t~O~~J'~0~2~1~Z~----------
.fJ!...<; c
Use spaces be low to list additional informat ion •
I • • •
0
'
·. , • •
•
•.
0
•
SECTIOt-4 ll
Health Therapy Applicants only ,
Englewood Business where you Will be employed __ "N;:-•"'m-="o----------------------
Address ____________________ Owners Name ______________________ ___
Accredited School of Massage Attended :
Str .. t cu, It a t e
From--------------to-------------N umber of Hours Tra ini ng Rece ived-------------------------
Al l prev ious employment in Health Therapy Establishments
l.Na me From to
Address Owners Name
2.Name From to
Address Owners Name
3.Name From 0
Address Owners Name
octdrs Statement
I have examined the above named applicant and find the applicant to be in good health
Signed-----------------------------------Date ______________________________ ___
Address ______________________________________________ __
SECTION ID
Al l applicants : Notary Pub lic
'I
STATE OF COLO RQ
COUNTY OF ( -~uJt..__ • by me f1rst duly sworn , If for himself. deposes and says ; that he is the applicant above named ; that he
has read the a foregoing application and that he know s the content thereof . and that all matters and
•
things therein set forth ar e true to the best of his knowledge
~~aM 1 I • •
0
f
•
-
•
•
•
Police Action ; Englewood Police Depart ment
Fl ngerprints and Photo Taken
•
• •
Yes ____ _ No ___ _
Taken B)! ______________ Sent to C .B .I. _____ F.B .I. _____ Other _____ _
Findings : '/W
Comments ~
Return to Revenue Div ision
Revenue Division Act ion :
Approved _________ Disapproved---------
Comments :
Signed : --:11...,.,.,..:-...,.=-"'c~~,c:c•'.------------
Revenue Division
3400 S. Elati .Englewood ,Colorado 80110
781·11-40
' ..
'
I • •
0
-
•
•
Ci t y of Englewood , Colorado
Personal History for Licensing
•
• •
R ~ f '• r--: I • I J:' D
.... J l ~ I .•
icense Applied For : [: ~ 3 1976
Ltquor /3 2 Beer__.X~ __ Recreat lon Facility _____ Health Therapy Other _____ _
~1 . 0~ flll\:lC E.
tMGlE\lOOD SECTION I
Name £,l)Wf#?JJ Eie!IESr ~??.])oV& Social Security ~.s=c2/-.::20-~~..3,
Home Address 33 ec:::z. 3, E,(t>/Y.€./1/Ce ~tr6'Z:: }ctYVER . (1_ () £Cl.:2..3/
SHeet City ?fltoto Zip
Date of Btrlh 16:41/Q'· /9.:2::< Place of Btrth V-?R/ ra >. M /?1.
Hetght s=/ 3" We tght 15:0 Color of Eyes lf/?DWIV Color of Hatr 86/lC!/t Race£sex _2!_
Citizen . U.S . ~ Other Marital Status : Marrie d ~ Single Divorced ___ _
Name of Spou se P/1t!~£TTE dfA:Ye/E @_t1&;ROV/l
Addres s of Spouse 331?2 S. hc:?t<7F"IIr<!e cJo,wr. J?s/J/1/.P.t$ (!?J rf;Y2 7;
'-Street 0 //) Cl~ Stele Zip
Ch ildren .]2&/V tEL, e.. 9i&.8£/'i?T£ GRl?" zr~ Age _3~....!9~--------
)!J;es. $~uEI. e .(&ez;t:,~w;s 0~ Age _:2_?="--------
&unfl&D ~ C!~A"""..P<?Vt9-Age-'~=~<;-'--------
------~~------~---------Age _______ ~~----
Parents . Fathers Name @_.ELE;:;Z~!V" &12Ql!j£ Mothers Name P..e.Et/6/ 0 (ji,R..l>& v &
Address ./J£<:1-£.$BlJ Address 72cc E ,9S..G;;_ P
Employmen t Record-past 10 years
1. Employer /I S /I.e,! /l.un; P.u;.II!T) $.,p;&z. From IS /I!A''f 19kb to Is-~V /9 7 6
Addr ess If?~ f.eu.Jh&A; .:? ~6R'.qn~)Position held C!l~-t~t; lkce?li?J liRAZI/V, _}), v.
2 . Employer J?.er/~E:J) From I::Fr?bt11 1'/76 to ________ _
I
Address Pos ition held
3 . Employer From 0
Address Position held
4 . Employer From to
Address Position held
' ·. . ,
•
"'
I • •
0
f \ !
I
'!
•
•
•
•
0 ,,
•
Addresses-past 5 years 17 •. 2...
(j 5>4-'l/?1 ""tf~..(/9,Y~ A'//1-lfY
FromNcv /&{7/ toDE<:elfzSstreettlPtJ New t(' 0 vRS City b/lf!,?~
Month -Tnr (
From]}£(! l <f'1.£_to J1:. ~~ J 47hstreet3$2 9.E-<4PE#C!E ~&Ltity.~VY£.e
Month · Year
State G-~..,..9~
State ~6
From to Street City _____ State ___ _
Month ·Year
Frorr to St reet City
Monttl ·Year
_____ State ___ _
From to
Month · Year
Street City _____ state ___ _
Have you ever been convicted of a felony or misdemeanortexclude minor traffic violations) Yes __ No y
If yes give dates, places . nature of offense . penalty or punishment------------=------
Cha racter References : List Three (3)
1. Name W,L .(. 09-t?l -:;[. E pu.J((tf? PS
Address 93 2 0 · £.
Occupation ~L FS ~~IJ..§<;/b. ' 7
2. Name 'T"tt If W, ..S:rtj
Address ~57 1/;.v-..SJi>c /),e7 &sr-'..£ 8<2.£) (!~ cfo/o,t/
Occupation C)Lt! 4'.&:.C "f-=t!ha4~E:e {!_fltftSTEA(SEY~ Mt&RAr&CV. T/
I
3. Name frleL VIII/ IZRt:> .vs tJ 11/
Address -4' 7" 0 W
Occupation J(E Tl ~F. J)
/.64 v wa ,ep
I
cJ H.' t{ E.. .e.
Use spa ces below to list additional information
p -Z , ZJ.e IV v E 12 , ~ 0 £0 i:< I ::L
(}HtL-DREIYf,' a;..,,e 3HoP
•
I • •
0
•• 1 r
I
'!
,_ •
• , .
•
SECTIOt'll IT
Health Therapy Applicants only ,
.nglewood Bus iness wher e you will be employed __ "N"'•=m-=-·----------------------
Add ress ____________________ Owners Name ________________ _
Accredited School of Massage Attended :
Name $1r"t cu.
Fr om _______ to ________ Number of Hours Tra ining Received ___________ _
All prev1ous employment In Health Therapy Establishments
1 Name From to
Address Owners Name
2.Name From to
Address Owners Name
3.Name From 0
Address Owners Name
octdrs Statement
I have exam in ed the above named applicant and find the applicant to be in good health
Signed------------------------------Date _______________________________ _
Addres s _________________________ __
SECTION m
All applicants : Notary Public
STATE OF COLORADO,
COUNTY OF(----~~~~--~-----L-_____ __ • by me first duly sworn , if for himself , deposes and says ; that he is the applicant above named ; that he
has read the a foregoing application and that he knows the content thereof, and that all matters and
•
th ings therein set forth are true to the best of his knowledge
~a~~c?(
Su scribod and sworn to before me this 197C
I • •
0
o '' ll'tlbllc
M y commission expires ~-7P...,.l-i>t;~' ,_...1< ... 071-~.1---L.f-'-7_,../ ____________ _
~~--------------------------~-----------------
. ,
•
•
•
•
Police Action ; Englewood Pol lee Depa rtment
Fingerprints and Photo Taken
•
• •
, .
Yes ____ _ No ____ _
Taken By _____________ sent to C .B.I. _____ F.B .I. _____ Other ___ _
Comme nts ~
Retu r n to Revenue Di vision
Revenue Division Action :
Approved ---------Disapproved ________ _
Comments :
Sig ned : __ R~.,.-...,.-~C-hl-.t-----------
Revenue Division
3400 s . Elati,Englewood,Colorado 80110
761 -1140
. ,
• .
'
I • •
0
•
•
•
•
• l•
•
..... ~ r · t.-.-,-~
.3.244 ~
~ .... .,.t-=-·-.,.(_~ .80011
Tlli.r IS
n~ ( rl.es .
'
72l r e lf'7, ~"" r T H>-1 'T
CA I..J I/If.[) Co!~!.oov,<f-
:I? uo.e~<C?.D FoR fl~ts . P..,~oo.t.em: G.~oovlf ~o "1
jq"-'"!.T o~ 1~6'1 ~o u.Got-.:J"l'-'"""1 "'~ 0~ lq1l 1 t...J>H:-.J l).u ,fo,o<><>,..,._
WI'\S CoMPTR. OL..LE.e 0 ,::' USI'll"e CL!f~ .:il.. ;::.,., «~0 " .f 1\J 04/"
{t<P Pt.ofR.<ft~O p._.IVD l"t 0 e..JC '1 OoC ~ (,/, ~. c:'avi!YtAJI'11!:4JV" ,/
C 1\J G 1'1-G€o 1 >l Re ntllt.;AI ~ lt;...C{llfot..t C (3 f.;l' elf "G"".J TO l'll'te,tl I CI'IAJ
ftR.So>.Jo.JeL OV~RSE:"!S ,
n~ 'i njl.<;.. G:.RO O v~ ftfi.f!'!, ~c-.;f'; , U..fl'S'1"11V01AJ'-) v.f"~V"I<.OI\1"1'1'1
c ,,, CE.v s w ff~ ~.-t£ oen ottJS T'II?~o c;-00 c l'to~ltL.. CIJ'Wtfl~tc.vei!L..J
1'!1..10 Wft<.) ;Mue Se«veo -"J«~D ~'"· s e ... vllk ~ Co l'fi1U«~17"'f
TV ~ 6esT of! ~'It 14e u .1 7 '1 .
::? ~e '-•v <!:o l'rT ~ Mo v i:, A-o.oRE.s~ f=:oA.. 7/ollecra
It ""' ~ ~<-F' Ye"lA..S I'J...,o A ~; C<vufcNTL'f t;;ooDLo'-/t;o
1'1!:. 19.-J :::I';v'Tl!UIVItL l?~r.n!.Vut1 I'Tc;<!!"'V"' .,(3 'I .::z1~o41,..;_,.,_
f<e-ve .v~..ol!: 'i:':e.Qv oc e. 72 C "i.v r:!Jc: REI'fc~ D'-'~':u" ~
z.,,'1 f)-T 83'1-31$~
'3~'1.-13ql ,
• .
I • •
0
•
•
TO WHOM IT MAY CON CERN:
•
• •
9320 E . Center Ave .
Denver, Colorado 302 Jl
Nov . 6 , 1976
! have kr .c wr. '-J,,o.LJ E . Ce;rJova , wno now resides at
3382 South Florence Court , DPnver , Colorado, s ince
1943 . We workpd clos ely tog ether f or approxima tely
two years, d ring which time I obs e rved how we ll he
carried out his jo b involving property a nd fisc al
re s ponsibil i ties .
He is a hard wor king , honest individual wit h a fine
moral character. He is a married man who has raise d
a fine family whilP wor king for approximately twenty
year s f or our feder3l government in a responsible
po si tion .
I recommpnd hdward Co rd ova hjghly to ar.yone look ing
for an hon es t , im:ellieent indhi d u al with a high
moral character.
~2n-.ff .~~
Wi lliam J ~dwards
'
• .
I • •
0
·. , f 32xl
• -• •
•
•
,_
< .. '
'
I · •
0
·I
•
•
• .
~
•
0 -
,..
I . •
0
'
• . , .
•
• ...... .
•.
. . .
• •
0
•
•
•
•
• -
-7o WW7W -"'~ ~ ~~.·
d ~h~~~~~ ~~
~~ 1 1s-!:. --4L ~ cr/'V . ~
~f~~~r~£-~~
~---r/-' ~~ ~ {~ ~
~ j)#vtri/ J ~ ~.~
-yvd -~ ? ~--Jt-t'£ ~-~ )'1/krr-v cl 4rn-f_
f; h w tk? ~.._ p k.:? -t£ ~
~ ---~~··' d Gnv.u ~-/ )J"no ~ ~ ~ a-
}-l~ ~"'1 ~d ~-:! z
~_£ ~n-ct' )u4 ~
n4 u+l....d;/ '/7u:2Z-r u_,u/ ~
-vin~ ·-t ~ i ~c( ~~ ~
Jl-7~ ~ -zL ,?,;7?-y-(?<r-:( ~ I 7 7 ~ ·~·
&rd..~ ~ t::--;i.,.-;td ~ cy'
~ ~. .../~ ~ /:c? /-z.--~~<-:::?
~ _;,-..,_ k .1) •'+vi-----;;;?:'.7?>--~
-~ .~~ ~~~
'
. ,
l .. .
• .
I . .
0
'
• ' . -• .
• (•
• ' . .
..
• •
0
' . .
•
-
'I : .. . . --. l,u· ;\.-~ 'f..L.-,~( ·...,..(,l l ll-1
[,
I
•
•
•
• , .
•
I
c · ... L·• ,~_ ,. t} t ... , / f
,Lu . 1 •
I
I
, . l·-;
l-1 L ~ • L.._'
I
:i .Jt u._": (, ~.
I . •
0
. ,
,_
•
0 , •
•
-----
~---------
a-_.,{;7:;{, -.r ~ ~tL,-f--'
7
f."'~~' ~::!i;; f:z::::, ~~ .. ~=d.~~ 'TL~~~';-5:. ..
_J ·v w. .Y.... --. c~-~~ v .
• ••
\·
h
"
.· \ !
' • I
'r
. . .
• •
0
'
-
\ ··• \
•
..
!·.
•
.. -•
0 , .
•
---... -......,
TIUI lND~HTUa&. lllade ~.-llLL--.... 7 .C.---1~:!.:!!1!~ . .-~'-·--·----~ ~~~ ......_
--~!!.!·~.:_Le~ ~.t...!'..!.!J .!_a~-~~.!.:~.z..!'~.:...-~!:.f!:. ______ __... --~
!d~a rd ; . C o rd -Jv ~~t. ·~~1~.!!:_~\..!-.' . ..!.~.:. .. 5:.?.!.:'.1 ?~----------------·-
----------------··· ---····---------·--~-1
wtTNau:nt.. 'IW. .. ......,.dM at * ......,, ol U.. ,.t aN ... ......._ .., ,_,.,..... fll tM -... _ .. "1114 ..w , ____ .-.....-... '""' ... ..w -----._____ __ ........ ___ ....... __ ...... ·-· ··-Ia ""'eo-."'-~-~-:-:-~------
.. &oM •s-fll ~. -. .tt =--~-ill!l _~_!£!1Jd: 1 o n_J_tL!.!:.l!.£!!~ad ~!',_dum=----
----------------------------------------
---------------··-···-·--. ------------------------------····--· --------· ·----------------·· -----------·--------------
t'O a.&VS AND TO HOLD tiM..,.. with .U &M a~ •'-...__..~...a.. .... --
fll -..__!!j __ ..., t1---~-~-~«;! _______ .. u ....1.2._ ..cu-..~ .... .._.-.,...__~
-., ., ____ l!.C?."!.!.~~e.r.._ _________ , U._.:l ~J ., at and lew • ... tal, for tiM f\IU '-&fO'NIIIItd "'····-------
_1'en _:p .ou!!~U~S!!.-.tiE."..!!!'~~-!.t.:~ .. E~iJ..QQ.::.:.::.:::.:.:.-.:7.:.:.::::.:=.::::.:.:.::.:.:=-:.:......_ _....
111 _..., _.._ ,_ __ 'n).[!~ .. J!'!E.1~ .. ~-ru!...!!.'i!I..!..OO~::.:::.:_c.:.:.:.:::.:.=..:.MIIut--.
·····-········---··--·--------------
---------··---··-··-···----···-·· ·····················-·-----·-····---··-----------------
~_l~e__h!oJ...!M!.Q~UIII .1!...!~QI:IlS'll!.JJl..b.V:C.1n...All4...G',~~~Iolh:lll .. a.....,..ln .. ea._
~-tlil!l .. !.!..!h':!!'!'£!L!.~1!..t<m..!l!2:!.L-.. ------------------
-------------
--------------
-----------------
•
·.•
·'
..
I • •
•'
•
•
•
•
• •
, .. . ·~---.. --.. ~·
' ~ .....
'· 0
'!be t oll0111z1t1 proorhiona ,,.. hereby ... de • part of the leue dated llo-r 1•'
1976 'lfb l ch h attaehed he...,to ...s e ntered Into by the underllaned:
l. 1'ba deaertptton ot the d e 11i1ed p remiee1 1a a s tollowe:
Tile DOI'tharly 16 X 75 root portion ot the bulld ina situated OD the roUa.i ..
teaalibtod real .. tat& 1n tho County of Ar apahoe and State or Colorado, to-wtt: V'
'!bat portion ot a tract o r land In the swt or SIC, See. 34, T 4 s, R 68 V
or tho 6th P.IC . ducribed aa rollova: Beslnnlna at a poi nt J6o.70 r .. t
north ot the Q corner of BrO&dvay and Hamden Avenue, thence Jt . 47 teet,
theDeo r:. 125 r .. t, thence s . 47 f e e t , thence w. 125 r .. t to place ot ~l nniaa -s. 6 inches or l o t 6, Block 5, Premier Addition, known •• 3434 South Br~.
2 . It la llreed tbat the Le aaora shall not be requi red to decorate the iDterior
ot the 4..a.d p .... u.. &od that any auch decoration or any other chana .. or alterat1011a
. 1n the llltarior oll&ll be Mdo by tho Leueea and t hen only v lth tho vrit t e n eonaent ot
Lleaora . Lea .... aaree to aave the Leeaora hanU.e ea from all changes tor labor or
•tal'lala .... .., enecbantee lien• on account ot a ny such work done by lesaeea Ia
]. l\ 11 -..ratoodl aDd acreed that in addition to the rent reserved , the
t. ..... will pey a pro r ata ahare or any real prope r ty tax i nc re•••• a ase11ed
..,W..t the property in wh ich the demised area 1a located vlth 19 75 beina used ••
tho ...... period. The pro rata ohare ahall be determined by the front toot ap uaed
or the property ....... d .
lt. I\ la ..,..ed that in t be event or any b reach of any covenant or a ny
a&,.._ftt \llllhr thil lea• by the Le ssees wh ich re quirea Lea1or1 to hi re an
attOI"MJ', the Le1 1"1 ab&l.l pay reasonable a ttorney' a feee incurred by Leaeora
-tiler ouit h brolllbt or not.
5. 1'be Lee a ... •hall have a n option to lease said premiaes for an &ddi tional
t hree year period (llo cellbor 1, 1 979 to November 30 , 1982) a t a monthly rate to
be neaot iated in Slptember, 1979 under the same condi tiona a a contained in thta
leaae ~nt , provided written notice 1a given t o the Leasora 30 day1 prior to the
eapirat10ft elate ot their l eaae. In 1982 Leaaeea MAy exer c ise a aecond option
COftri.,. another three year term (December l, 1982 t o November 30, 1985) a t a monthly
rate k be necotta ted in Al&Cuat, 1982 under the s ame c ondl.ttona a a contained in
thta leaae .. ,......nt, provided wri tten no tice t s e i ven to the Leaaora 30 daya
prtar to the expirat ion ot their tirft t lea se extenti on .
By·~~c. -e:rr-~· .. ,
<i&M 1 f.!H f,.y j + •co ~••
ror themae l ves and the
Hagge Account, Lessors.
.~ I
'·
.
'
'·
.•
'
I
• .
• •
0
-
•
•
•
•
•
KISINESS OPPOR'IUNITY COifi'RACT
Denver, Co l orado, J'tove~~ber 2, 1 976
}W c eived tra. Edward E. Cordova a nd Pau lette M. r orjova, PurchaaerG, the aa ot $2 ,500 ••
s.a. tiM t o"N ot a pereon&l check, to be held by HOWU'd Jllahop & Co., broker i n hi a ••~
• tt"'rA.a tM: aceaunt , a a euneat money a n•l part pb)'lt'ent for the follovin& deacribed ltUw:lDe •• 1neul41ne the atock ... 1n-t rade, &fl ieta ,f'1xturea, a nd
..._1~nt. thtreol &a let f ort.h J n the inventory, wh l C"h io made a part of thll ........ ftt,
kD OWD aa !JICLD«)())) LI'I)OR IJIC., l ocated a t Jl.o-y. !"'o . oatJ _,.,y , Englewood, Color&4o.
P\lrcb&aera ..,... to W,. aaid buaireaa on he t ollovt.na tenas a nd c ond1t1osu:
$2,:100.00 ... ..., Mee1pte4 !or, $2,500.00 in caah or corUCled l'lu>do upon uecutlon
fll l>Ul ot Mla . l'llr-ro hereby aaree ~o 011,_ ond pay an erlotiac S.B.A. lAM
1JI \he ....-1M~ -.. ot 116,000.00 payable to :;outhweot State Bonk in -t!Lb' pa.rwa~
ot $231<.00 ~lac prtne1pal an4 in~eroat ot the rau or ~. Purcba:ora aball
.-cute tt:.lr note ..._ Security Agreemen t and fina.n~ial r.tatement, payable t o aellers,
1JI tbe lii'PTOat..to -.nt of $19.000.00 po yoble I n "'onthly Ina 811-r ta o f ~4o.Oq
or.,.., i.nc:ludtn prioc 1pe.l and int.ere:;t -.t U':a rat.t. of (~. pro11 1ert. t .owe ver tt-e
eftt.1n ~t be due a.nd raya ble ten (10) year• fro:Jl d&t.t: of e:aer.ution the n a r .
Su bJect to the tollcwi nc licenaes , leaa:es, a :.:;i e nmPnt ~, zon i nc nr.tf 'or ·ont1ngenc tea :
( lfrM: e44eDdW!I a t t.achf>tt to a nd also rn&d e a p a rt. of t h i =~ con r&ct.).
S.... to be 1 0ld. 1n ca.pl 1ance with the Untror rn Conrtf'rC'i a l C"od e on flo.J.l k Trhn::!era.
(Chapter 155, Article 6 , uRi, 1 963).
ftaea, lnt.ereat, insurance premiums , 'J&ter a :;:::c!:tW'nt.:;, rent:; anrt o t.er contlnulnc
1teu to be ad:~a ted to date ot t ran:-f e •··
nw seller vtll deliver to the JllO.r c "'.a ::;err a Pi ll of :".:ale, fre~ &.nd t:leac-ot all
~eoi:\Yibanc ea eac:ept those mentioned h~reir1, c.n o:-L~f.,r,.. I ~~;.,mhe r 13 , 1')/n. Cccupa.ney
ot the 'b'..11ineaa will be deliveret1 to purcna:!•ra or fJe •~e"!';~ r 13 , l t.i;o .
In t he event the c b&ttel3 abo·I'! 1~tc ri~tl ttte !.:Uh:;t.,,nt i"ll'l o •tr.w_; .. ·t lr.J fire,
flood or other casualty be t·o~ee n t t,f! dat{' or t.t.i s ner ee1Nu .• t.nrt the da r.e o f •·l osine;: of
th11 tJ'&fl .. C:tion, this aaree!Df!nt ma y , hot t~e pu"Cil&'"4!r : IJ ptlOr to~re1 fl , t e !S t r.larert
aul.l an4 void, and any depo s i'~ herei:'l. rNlrte ~hall \i,. i.!Jif"l'!l11 8 ,.ly re t,;r :.ed t.o pu rct.aaer ~.
Tl..me 11 ot the elaeDC:e t~ereo r , flrid if ny ph :r.en · o r b.ny ')t.t-.c r ... ~dBl 'r . t-.areo t
11 not ll&de, tendered, o r perfo rmed l ·t e i '.!.~r ~~· :::elle~" n r pu.rct ... '·r ~ ll .. r.ert:oir.
prorlde d , t hea thi1 contract , at the o ption o ! •.•,. {)&r ... :/ w o L ·o•. in J·:~·Jlt ,
.-, be t.eNin&ted. by 1uch pa r ty, tr. "'h L t , c !t.s e th,. t r')r.-·J •f,~·t l Tin.; ·., r t.:J me.J recover
I'Uch d:._e1 u ,.y be proper. In tr.~ e ·ter.t. of e•Jc li d~fcu lt b:,· t.t.e ·-:ll'!:r, "r.rt
the pu.rchaaera elects to tn:a t t hie eor,'.r!.c t a :. '.'::1':\jJ,~'~;:rl , '!.~.cr ~t.ll {>&1 n •r.:.c ~e
benon ah&ll be r eturned t o t t:e pu rct-~a s er l . :n t t.,. e l f:nt . of ,:ych rJefa11lt by tbl
puoc:~ra , and the M ile r e le c t~ to t rea". t ~.~ ... ~t.r &C't ':s ·~rr<r.a •."!1, · ~ ... r. all
payments Mde hereWider shall 'LI! forfe i t e d &nJ r ~'tta.i ~et or. be r e;.Jr of:~ ... : :eller.
I.e the event , hovever, t i"e ncn-defauJt i:-.g ;arty '· ";!'c·:-t.c-tr ~a.:. !.r 1:-"'">ntra c":. ao
beiDC i n tull force ar.d effect, tt.er. no ... t.ir...; t.e,~i :'\ :r ~.l t ,. c o;.r.•r1·l'!<i '.O pre·.1 ~nt
1 tl aped fie perton.ance .
In the e ·e nt. the £eller tails ~c 8r•r r c·.'! •.r.1t. ir.li'.r ..li..ent 1r. vr i•!r~ c:-o r t.ero,..
loveml-er 5, 1)76, tt"en •.r:i s c :J n:.rat:, a·. 1.urC!"ll ~~-~~t• d •ll :.e ·rH1 '•:.1 "l t r:>
effect .
t.1'poo -.p prOYa.l t.ereo !" b y !.h~ :>tll er, !.~ •• b. ·r ...... r. • :-:: 8 ~ 1 C.fl "'' --: , ·: :..r tr a ~'. t.et<~een
seller &r.4 purchaur &1'\d shall i r~u:-e ~o tJ~ t'·--:1: ' • .. ···~r :, ·~~· . .r::.·:.r:, l).nfl
as signa c t aalc1 partie s.
~t«d?'.?~ . ...._ ?: .. --·:n.
uctl&Hr Late
Purc haaer .,_,_.~:~tVi .• ~ tJ '-;-('
Se:l.er a ppro t tl.'t a t:O\'e c Or.tr'lr.-· .... 1. •"~ c r' 1 •• J\r.J 4~"'11!-t .l
to pq a ca.t.J.ailoa. 0~ .... ~ r -:.r ;•r t c ~ll ~ .. i; ":'1r~s "t1.·~., 1\ .. "''V" .. ees. ~r..a"';, !.,
tr.e e\·e r.t o f for-feit :..rl! o f :!'~:•-:r.er.t : ~'~~ \, ~-,.r-. .~:-. ·"~.,..,.:"i t · : tall '".'! 1il1d"!d te ~
t~.e al.lers brebr a:-.11 the a ell~r, o:> ... e-talt !. .. "!;e ... ~· :\1 J b · .~,.."!, .... ": :-.1)"': ~ ':I ":'~
t e car::r:.lasi on, ar.d :.~~ b al&.r.f"e • .., ·re -·l .. r .
~'h . 41 ),e-:_..,(,.4 (t';j . .y. ?(-
/ ---1 .·7 . ~~~~~/-t./·,;6 ~
•
~.
• •
0
·' f
•
•
• •
'·
~DDEIIOOM TO AND A PART Of niE
BJSINESS Oi'fO R'MII'l'Y COIITAA T
DATED NOVDIBER 2, 1976
.:;r . <I
(1) Th 1e contr-.ct 11 expreaaly c onditional upon purc hacera a.saUJDing t he CBA Loa.a. a t the Soutlwu t state Banlt.
for the purchas e or
EN GU:WOOD LIQUOI!, !Nr..
3434 SOUTII BROAJJWAY, EN G L~WUO D, rOLORAOO
(2) Thb contract ts exprouly conditional upon purcha "4 '" obtaining the neceasaey
lieenaea and peraita to continue the operation or aa lJ b uetnesa.
(3) Alao eoat1111ont upon the exeeution or a now buain~ss lease tor a per i ocl of nine (9)
1 .... • at a .:lflthly ren tal to be &g reed upon by the purcha se rs and property ovnera .
(~) Slai>J•ct aloo , to for•r ownero providing neceszary help and ori en tation tct new ownora
tor-a period not t o eaceed thirty 30 ' day :~ after· ext:-cution of Bill ot SAle.
(5) S&llero &&roo to eaeoute a covenant not t o c ompete .-!thin a radius or ri-.. (5) 11ileo tor • periOd or five (5) year£.
(6)
'nla pu.rcha ae price ct'the b uline ss to be alloca t ed i n the follo wi ltg m&n ner :
(A) Iqu1peeot &lld inventory o f Ch3t.tel! u~e d in t.he operati on of bus lne•• (B) C<>ftnaot not to compe te __________________ _ $25,000.00
$15 ,000.01)
(7) The actual value or inventory to be debenuined by & physical count on or before
clo•inc and priced by the priceo as contained i n the ...:urrent months issue ot the llov•rac• Analya ht and S&lud or dP.r I!Uido.
TOT AL Jl+O ,006. 01!
(8) Purchaooro to furnhb, to sellers, an .a cc e p~ub le credlt report o n or before cloai111 .
(9) Jo ropruo ntatioca other than ~hos~ expressed herein, either oral or wr l tten, are a part ot tbi• contract .
(10) It 1o .,tually underatoocl thot the calea pri ce of t ht• property is t o be $loo,ooo.oo plua t he inventory,
-r-.·-
.J-f ,,, ... //
Date
I
'
.....
• .
...
I}' · .. ·
'
I • •
0
.• t
-
'I
(
•
•
•
CALL TO ORDER
•
-
MINUTES OF
ENGLEWOOD HOUSING AUTHORITY
REGULAR MEETING
October 26, 1976
The meeting was called to order at 5:10 p.m. by Chairman Thomas
J. Burns in the Library Conference Room.
Members present:
Members Absent:
Others Present:
Thomas J. Burns, Chairman
Betty Beier, Vice-Chairman
Berry Slater
Vern Mann
Rev. Stanley Fixter
None
Al Johnson, Executive Director, Englewood
Housing Authority, Richard Wanush, Director
of Community Development, Alice Fessenden,
Associate Housing Coordinator
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Vern Mann moved for the approval of the minutes of the August
10, 1976 meeting. The motion was seconded by Berry Slater and
passed unanimously.
Berry moved for the approval of the minutes of the September
28, 1976 meeting. The motion was seconded by Vern and was
passed unanimously.
BILLS AND COMMUNICATIONS
Chairman Burns acknowledged the letter of resignation from
Berry Slater. He expressed regret over the resignation and
t hanked Berry for his continuous service on the Housing
Authority since it was started •
SECTION 8 EXISTING
Alice reported that 24 of the 25 certificates in the rent
subsidy program have been issued. Twelve certificate holders
have located housing and have signed the required one year
lease. The waiting list consists of approximately 32 families.
Vern Mann requested clarification of what constitutes grounds
for eviction. Al Johnson responded that any violation of the
lease by either party could be considered grounds for eviction.
'
••
•' \ !
'!
I • •
'
•
•
•
•
-
The Housing Authority receives notification o f the potential
eviction at the same time as the tenant (10 days) and must
issue written objections within 20 days of notification.
Alice then informed the Authority that because of the dif-
ficulty in finding larger housing units (3 and 4 bedrooms)
a 20% increase (10% from the Housing Authority and 10% from
HUD) will probably be required on 5 uni ts (20% of our allo-
cation). This is the maximum allowed by the HUD regulations.
If increases are required beyond 5 units the Housing Authority
will be requ i red to undergo a complete administrative review
by HUD.
The Housing Authority's Section 8 program was reviewed by
Scott Carpenter (HUD) on Octo ber 19. Chairman Burns should
be receiving a letter concerning the results of that review
in the near future.
Alice explained the Section 8 policy clarification, which
involved the prioritizing of the Section 8 waiting lists.
Because other areas give first priority to families living
or working in their city, the staff felt Englewood residents
were not receiving the attention deserved. (The waiting list
is currently operated on a first-come, first-serve basis.)
MOO' ION
Vern Mann moved the following priorities be adopted as
administrative policy:
1. First priority given to persons presently living
or working in Englewood.
2. Second priority to Arapahoe County residents not
having priority under another Section 8 program.
3. Third priority to all others.
The motion was seconded by Berry Slater and passed un-
animously.
SECTION 8 -NEW CONSTRUCTION
Al reported on the progress of the Apartments for the
elderly. The building, orginally due for completion
in February, now has a completion date of May 1, 1977 •
There was no penalty clause in the contract for late
completion. Because of the need to keep the bids on the
project as low as possible, the penalty clause was not
able to be included. However, Brady is receiving a lot
of pressure from the City and the architect. We have sched-
uled a monthly progress meeting to ensure the fact that the
project stays on schedule.
A date of occupancy was discussed. Al reported on a recent
meeting with Public Service which revealed that the building
must be near completion, but not necessarily occupied to
maintain our present gas commitment. In order to speed-up
occupancy we are discussing with Brady the completion of
the floors starting with floor #7. The City could then
2
•
...
·.,
)
I !
'!
I 0 0
'
•
•
(
•
•
-
take possession and move residents in providing liability
questions could be resolved,
...
Repayme nt of the bonds was discussed. Al pointed out that
because of the refunding we need to start generating roughly
$10,000 monthly by June to cover the December payment. The
June payment is covered because of the bond refunding.
Al presented Brady's revised cash flow projections. At
the beginning of October Brady's cash flow revealed at
'$500,000 difference between previous predictions and
actural expenditures.
The Council's recent decision to eliminate the culdesac
on Lincoln for the senior campus effect was discussed. The
reason for the elimination was due to budget constraints.
Rev. Fixter moved the Housing Authority send a letter to the
Council to endorse the senior citizen campus concept and urge
them to obtain the funds required to construct the Lincoln cul
de sac. The following resoiution was made by Rev. Fixter and
seconded by Berry Slater:
RESOLtrriON
Where as the Englewood Housing Authority highly endorses the
concept of a senior campus area for the senior recreation
center and the apartments for the elderly.
Be it resolved that the Englewood Housing Authority strongly
recommends that council exert effort to obtain funds to
construct the cul de sac on South Lincoln to implement the
campus concept (Scheme G.) for the apratments and recreation
center.
The resolution was adopted unanimously.
Al brought the authority up to date on the construction cost
overruns. Change orders have been processed for the cassions
and the sprinkler system. The next items to receive con-
sideration will be the purchase of the emergency generator,
t he internal electrical work for the generator and the voice
communication system •
Al reported on the meeting with Max Saul concerning the
architect's liability in the cassion overrun. Max had
explained that his firm was working to get the plans ready
for council action and in the 3-day period from April 25,
when a sketch of the building location was delivered to
Chen and Associates, to April 28th, when the exact location
of the building was determined,many decisions had been
made. Max had explained that there was no reason at that
time to suspect the need for an additional soils report to
be made. General discussion ensued on the historical as-
pects of building location. Al reported that Max would not
3
• . I \ !
~
I 0
f
•
•
•
•
-
c harge his 6 -1 /2% fe e f or any of the portion of the con-
t ract relati ng to t h e cai ssions. Th e concensus o f t he
Hou s ing Au t hority was th a t t hi s was a reasonable solut ion .
Past action on carpet selection was reviewed along wit h a
letter from the archi t ect suggesting a new brand and similiar
colors. The org ina l s elect ion for the hallway and lobby car pet
is no longer available. Therefore the architect proposed an
orange blend which was acceptable to the Authority. Of the
3 colors suggested for the apartme nts the brown and pale
green were acceptable . It was the concensus of the Housing
Authority that the Strawflower Gold should be replac ed b y
Placid Blue as the third color.
REHAB LOAN PROGRAM
Chairman Burns reviewed the recent events in the c ontract
with the State for rehab funds. There had been some questionn-
ing of the requirement of bonding on projects costing $1,000
or more. In checking with Hal Knott , director o f State Housing
Department, it become apparent that the project size requiring
bonding is $10,000. The page of the contract involved in this
clarification was r e placed and chairman Burns signed the con-
tract.
Contracting and bidding on jobs was reviewed. Vern Mann
expressed concern about the unreliability o f t he sweat
equity provision for completing rehab work. If the work
is not done correctly, where is the money to correct it?
Rich Wanush pointed out that there were significant savings
in using sweat equity and that it is best to judge each case
individually. It is an administrative responsibility to pro-
vide reasons and justifications for approving sweat equity.
We will be dependent on the building department to judge
the qualifications of sweat equity applicants.
Recently, a representative from the State, Rudy Sisneros,
visited the Housing Authority staff to provide advisory
assistance. He recommended that minimum amounts of in-
surance be required , but not in excessive amounts that
will hurt the prog ram. He recommended the requirement s
of workman's compe nsa tio n and general liabil i ty insurance
in the mi n i mum amou nts of 100,000-300,000-100,000. Concern
was expressed that t hese restrictions would effectvely cut
out the "little guy". There was a recommendation that a
large number of bid forms be sent out initially. It was
felt that the field would automatically narrowed to a
reliable core of contractors. Vern expressed concern that
a "sweetheart" arrangement with a few contractors does not
develop as it has in some previous, unsuccessful programs.
Al suggested we move to the next item on the agenda con-
cerning the income recertification in the rehab prog ram.
4
•
,. -
'
I
'
•1
(
•
(
•
•
0
The process, alt h ough r equired by the agreement with the
Cit y, appears t o be rather complex and not necessary for
ma y applicant s who are on f ixed or static income. It
was agreed that the changes in income would not be suf -
fi cient t o warrant a new schedule of payment.
MOTION
Following a short disc ussion Betty moved that the Englewood
Housing Authority continue using the present loan agreement
until an appropriate procedure can be formalized for a
recertification process. It was seconded and passed.
Chairman Burns requested that the staff present a monthly
flow chart on rehab fund expenditures.
Four rehab loan cases were considered, two were approved,
one was postponed, and one was denied.
Rich Wanush, Director of the Community Development Depart-
ment, informed the Housing Authority of an idea about the
availability of some discretionary funds from the Federal
Government. The funds would be used for a community project
geared toward housing, probably rehabilitation. He outlined
3 general directions that the housing portion of the program
might take: 1.) extending the present rehab program 2.)
establish different criteria for qualifying for rehab, or
3.) earmark the discretionary funds for a particular area
of Englewood. The program is to be comprehensive and there-
fore, it would be developed for more than low income neigh-
borhoods. Mr. Wanush said he had examined some of the legis-
lation creating the Housing Authority and did not know if i t
had the authority to deal with the middle income persons.
He also mentioned the possibility of leveraging the Federal
funds to obtain a line of credit from local private lending
institutions. A short discussion followed with chairman
Burns commenting on the number of successful examples of
leveraging public funds presented at the NAHRO National
Conference in New Orleans.
Th e meet i ng was adjourned at 9 :20 p.m •
.
v
5
'
I • •
0
•
• .
• ..
The Englewood Housing Authority Minutes of the October 26,
1976 meeting were officially approved by the
Commissioners on ----~D~e~c~e~m~b~e~r~~l~·~l~9~7~6~--------------------
'
(
•
• • •
()
0
. ,
-
(
•
•
(
•
•
0
•
POLICE PENSION BOARD 3b.
Minute s of Decem ber 8, 1976 Meeting
The Englewood Policemen's Pension Board met on December 8, 1976 at 6:00p.m.
with the fo llowing board mem be rs in attend ance :
t~ayor James L. Taylor
Sgt . J. L. Leyden
Dir. of Finance Willia m D. James
Absent: None.
Also present: Brad Place, Rauscher-Pierce Securities Corp.
Board Member James stated tha t the purpose of this me eting was to review the
financial statements and inves tmen ts of the Police Pension Fund.
Brad Place, Rauscher-Pierce Securities Corp ., reviewed the investment port-
folio with the Boa r d. He noted that to date the Police Pension Fund has
realized a return of 9.45% on investm ents .
Mr. Place requested that the Board consider a proposed contract with his
firm to provide these investment services on a contractual basis rather
than on a flat fee basis.
United Bank of Denver has chan ged their policy whereby they will no longer
pay commission dollars to Raus cher -Pierce for services presently rendered
to the Board . Rauscher-Pierce has not been paid over the last three quarters
for the investment services they have rendered, which would incl ud e
December 31, 1976 . Mr. Place requested that the Board reimburse him
if possible for these expenses of approximately $50D for all three
quarters.
BOARD MEMBER LEYDON MOVED TO PAY RAU SC HE R-P IERCE THE AMOUNT OF $500 FOR THE
LAST THREE QUARTERS FOR INVESTMENT SERV I CES THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1976 .
Boa rd Member Taylor seconded the motion, and the motion passed by a unanim ous
vo t e .
The Board is presently lookin g at a contrac t from Rauscher-Pierce to pro-
i de these s ervices on an on -going basis at a flat fee of $500 per quarter.
Boa rd Member James recommended that this proposa l be reviewed by the City
At torney before an agreement is entered into.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:15p.m.
•• . '
. .
I • •
0
f 32xl
.......
•
•
(
•
•
..
ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD
December 14, 1976
3 v
The Englewood Public Library Board met for its regular meeting on Decemb e r 14, 1976
in the library conference room.
Present:
Absent:
Lighthall, Mueller, Quaintance, Shattuck, Simon, Sterling
Bennett, Clayton, DeuPree
Also Pre sent: Harriet Lute, Director of Libraries
Carol Pernicka, Secretary to the Board
The meeting was called to order at 7:45 and a quorum declared present .
The minutes of the Novem ber 9 meeting were approved as mailed.
The proposed contract wi th the Arapahoe Regional Library District was discussed.
Miss Lute pointed out to the Board that it would cost the Englewood Library
$600. a year to provide interli brary loans for Arapahoe Regional card holders .
She also told the Board that almost half of the reference services provided by
the Englewood Library staff are to non-Englewood residents, with half of these
being for Arapahoe Regional residents . If many more reference quest ions are
given to the reference staff, Miss Lute said that more staff would be requ i red
to handle the load.
Currently the Englewood Library is still providing interlibrary loan service for
Arapahoe Regional residents because of the present contract, although not for
juvenile or light romance titles. This service is not being given to other
CCLS libraries. Miss Lute also told the Board that the Englewood Library could
not ask Arapahoe Regional Library to pay for reference services if other system
libraries did not.
The contract proposed by the District was distributed to the Board. It was
moved by Mr. Shattuck that the District be notified that the terms proposed by
the District are acceptable to Englewood, with the exception of Number 3. The
motion was seconded by Mrs. Simon. It was pointed out in discussion that the
audit was estimated to cost $750. The motion carried unanimously.
Mrs. Simo showed the Board the materials prepared under the joint library-school
histo ry project of preparing materials on Englewood history for third grade
studen ts. Jackie Johnson, a WICHE intern, prepared the materials last summer,
and they were edited by James Curran of the school district. A set of all
materials will be presented to each public and parochial school IMC, and one will
be given to the Englewood Library and Jackie Johnson .
There is a comprehensive teacher kit, which includes 22 act~vlt~es such as games,
plays, slide shows, photos prepared by George Perrin from library slides of the
various Englewood floods, and pictures of historic Englewood houses . Maps of
Englewood and an official Englewood flag are also included. The student readers
were shown to the Board as well as the s lide/tape show.
• . ,
I • •
-
•
•
•
Library Board page J.
•
0 -,.
When the malerials are distributed to th e schools in January, publicity will
begin. A copy of the materials will be given to the HEW Title 3 office in
Washington, the agency in charge of cooperative projects between schools and
public libraries.
The activities of the Friends wer e then discussed. They will hold t heir annual
membership meeting on January 17 at the Phipps Auditorium. They are hoping for
new members and inc r eased i nterest at this meeting. A di scussion wa s then held
on community needs which the Friends c o uld fill. It was agre ed by the Boar d
that th e Friends are currently doing an e xce llent job, and are contributing to
th e Library, es pecially through th e good publicity they are getting. On
Monday ev e ning, De cember 13, they hosted th e annual Christmas tree light ing.
The activities began at 6:00 with th e decorating of the tree in the children's
section of the library. At 7:00 the Mayor lit the City tree, and a choir f rom
St. Mar y's sang Christma s carols. An orchest r a from Flood Junior High and
Englewood High played Christmas music in the Community Room. After refreshments
were serve d by the Friends , the movie "Babes in Toyland" starring Laurel and
Hardy was shown. Approximately 250 people attended the program .
On George Perrin day, December 9, the Friends served th e refreshments. This
was al so a great success, with over 200 people attending.
The librarian's report was then given. Hiss Lute told the Board that November
was a good month, with circulation being up over that of November, 1975. 558
children came to the library for programs, class visits, etc. compared to only
300 the previous yea r. There were 254 adults attending programs and meetings
com pared with 141 the previous year, for a total of 817 people attending
special events in the library during the month .
The Writ e rs' Workshop, partially sponsored by the Western Arts Foundation, wa s
succes sful. About 35 people attended each of three sessions, with 14 from
Englewood and others from as far as Northglenn and Morrison.
TI1e librarians also conducted several outside programs. Karen Kelly, Children's
Librarian, showed the Missy film to the Lowell faculty and the slide/tap
show "70 Years of Englewood" to th e Bishop School students. Lei Koestner went
one nurs i n g home to give a book rev iew, and David Brunton went to the other.
The Ha y Schoo l fourth grade made three visits to the library to learn to use the
card catalog and some of the letters they wrote to thank Karen Kelley wer e read .
Miss Lute told the Board that the encumbrances to close the 1976 budget are
ready to be typed , and some needed e quipment has been placed on order.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9 :45.
R4;f;l y submittic/(W
ckio~ A. Pernicka
Secretary to the Board
)
----.-------:;-~-· • . ,
I • •
0
\ !
I t
'!
• -
0 I•
•
Portion of Year to Date 92 %
( DEPA RT MENT OF FINANCE 3d EXPENDITURES TO 1976 BUDGET
GENERAL FUND
Throug h Nov~nber 31 ~
Last Last
Annual Cur rent Year to Dat e % of Year Year
Bud get Expenditures Expenditures Budget to Date _%_
Legislation & Council:
City Council $ 64,978 $ 2,139 $ 69,943 1D8 $ 65,223 95
Board of Adjustmen t 2,95 8 244 2,964 100 2,318 87
Career Service 6,356 147 1,6 25 26 5,149 93
Planning & Zoning 4,546 279 4,016 88 4,377 91
Library 3,366 103 2,827 84 1 ,329 59
City Attorney 101,539 7,662 85,101 _§i 76,954 92
Sub-Total $ 183 ,743 $ 10,574 $ 166,476 91 $ 155,350 93
Administration
City Manager $ 105,518 $ 9,576 $ l02,D25 97 $ 89,265 88 t ·so nnel 73,030 7,099 60.74 1 83 47,922 92
~asury & Record 84,319 7 ,345 78 ,816 93 64,851 88
Municipal Court 93,017 7 ,299 77 ,D74 83 65,374 91
Accounting an d
Automated System 138,455 11.394 124,900 90 114,772 93
Revenue Division 111,163 9,549 100,412 90 96,400 91
Purchasing 159,874 18,421 162,508 102 68,034 91
General Opera tio ns 0 178,044 94
Sub-Total $ 765,376 $ 70,683 $ 706,476 92 $ 724,662 92
Public Works:
• Senior Surrey $ 33,756 $ 2,797 $ 31,550 93 $ 25,176 91
Engineering 172,914 12 ,126 135,513 78 109,308 81
Streets & Drng . 759,170 53,573 653,230 86 550,889 89
Traffic Reg. 224,842 15,639 203,548 91 191,417 88
Bldg. Mai ntenance 272,953 19.949 233.763 86 91,031 89
Sub-To a1 $1,463,635 $104,084 $1,257,604 86 $ 967,821 88 ~
I • • •
Fire Department: $1,419,076 $137,067 $1,293,686 91 $1,169,840 92 c 0
• •
• -•.
• «•
•
1,
~ re?:----J-\-~ n
Expenditures to 1976 Budget
General Fund
Through November 31. 1976 ige 2
last last Annual Current Year to Date % of Year Year Budget ExEend i tures ExEenditures Budget to Date _%_ Police:
Police Dept. $1,574,128 $145,592 $1,416,588 90 $1,366,626 91 Corrrnun i cations 235,163 19,370 203,741 87 197,404 89 Animal Shelter 56,250 4,365 49,572 88
Sub-Total $1,865,541 $169,327 $1 ,669,90·1 90 $1,564,030 91
Community Development:
Code Enforcement $ 185,854 $ 14,333 $ 168,730 91 $ 153,798 91 Housing & Redevel. 36,587 3,227 32,037 88 21 ,894 89 Planning 111 !311 10,642 101,094 91 98,107 21. Sub-Total $ 333,752 $ 28,202 $ 301,861 90 $ 273,799 92
library: $ 281,939 $ 23,851 $ 234,710 83 $ 209,873 81
Parks & Recreation:
• Parks $ 565,932 $ 44,849 $ 508,645 90 $ 472,927 91 Outdoor Swim Pool 37,617 95 34,722 92 36,267 99 Indoor Swim Pool 60,656 2,813 43,906 72 35,561 87 Sports & Games 85,245 4,237 61,638 72 47,810 91 Cultural Activities 67,241 5,257 46,737 70 41,543 88 Playgrounds 37,394 726 30,985 83 31 ,490 100 Softball 22,046 1,537 20,972 95 15,253 99 Zoo 9,871 0 9,28 3 94 9,943 96 General Operations 104,235 7,059 81,645 78 77,534 93 Old Timers 25,557 910 24,871 97 21,586 _2.§_
Sub-Total $1,015,794 $ 67,483 $ 863,404 85 $ 789,914 92
• Total Expe nditures $7,328,856 $611,271 $6 ,494! 118 $5,855,289 91
• • I . •
0
•
• -
0 t• -
d·~~~---------=~ • •
Portion of Year to Date 92 % -
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
REALIZATION OF BUDGETED REVENUES
GENERAL FUND
Through November 31, 1976
t: of Last Last Budgeted Curren t Year to Budget Year Year Revenues Month Date Collected to Date _t:_
Taxes:
Property Tax $ 785,997 $ 42,880 $ 749,957 95 $ ' 617,877 94 Specific Ownership 40,000 702 49,295 123 45,136 98 Sales Tax 3,525,686 299,870 3,340,967 95 2,931,056 92 Cigarette Tax 450,000 43,409 430,181 96 432,576 91 Franchise Tax 405,399 20,000 396,829 98 359,841 97 Total $5,207,082 $406,861 $4,967,229 95 $4,386,486 93
Licenses & Permits:
Business Licenses $ 61,800 $ 6,535 $ 64.631 105 $ 65,185 122 Building Licenses 33,000 2,986 48,605 147 51,595 ill Total $ 94,800 $ 9,521 $ 113.236 119 $ 116,780 104 • Inter-Governmental
Revenues:
Federal Grants &
Revenue Sharing $ 707,238 $ 11,942 $ 536,305 76 $ 528,762 76 State Grants 6,000 2,000 33 3,045 60 State Shared Revenue 288,000 13,988 275 ,801 96 272,047 98 Arapahoe Bridge & Road 72,516 73,271 101 60!887 .lQQ_
Total $1,073,754 $ 25,930 $ 887,377 83 $ 864,741 83
Charges for Serv ices:
General Government $ 152,704 $ 1,808 $ 112,113 73 $ 104,224 76 Public Safety 7,480 414 4,899 65 5,753 88 Highway & Street 51,110 512 21,751 43 30,959 84 Anima l Shelter 7,500 265 10,558 141 7,244 56 School District #1 10,000 10,000 100 10,000 100 Outdoor Swfm Pool 14,306 15,524 109 15,512 100 Indoor Swim Pool 32,343 3,364 24,685 71 17,483 85 Sports & Games 29,692 2,809 29,456 24,454 99 I •
Cultural Activities 32,064 (1,317) 27,332 22,750 96 • Pl ayground s 300 1,089 363 408 100 • Softball 21,035 18 19,679 94 15,504 100 , Zoo 2,600 3,576 138 3,214 100 Old Timers 16,430 15,464 94 12,741 100
0
~ Library Contract 28!375 2!789 281277 100 22.571 ....12. Total $ 405,939 $ 10,662 $ 324,403 80 $ 292,817
. , •
• -
• t•
•
-=I n :s
Realization of Budgeted Revenues
General Fund
Through
• Page 2
November 31, 1976
% of last last Budgeted Current Year to Budget Year Year Revenues ~1onth Date Collected to Date _%_ Fines & Forfeitures:
Court Fin es $ 94,800 $ 10,534 $ 77,492 82 $ 79,931 89 library Fines 8,300 745 7,814 94 7,917 88
' Total $ 103,100 $ 11 ,279 $ 85,306 83 $ 87,848 89
Miscellaneous:
Joint Venture
5,980 Tax Refunds $ 75,0 00 $ $ 149,793 200 0 Interest 25,000 28,956 116 29,483 87 Rentals 0 475 4,675 0 843 0 Gain on Sale
of Assets 0 701 0 1 0 Ot her 105,000 422 95,381 _I}_ 31,733 flQ Total $ 205,00 0 $ 6,877 $ 279,506 136 $ 62,060 53
To tal Revenues $7,089,675 $471,130 $6,657,057 $5,810,7 32 90
=
• • • ,
0
•
•
0 I• -
4 \
Portion of Year to Date 92 %
• DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
REALIZATIOW OF BUDGETED REVENUES
PUBLIC IHPROVEMENT FUND
Throu gh November 31, 1976
% of Last Last Budgeted Current Year to Budget Year Year Revenue Month Date Collected . to Date _%_
Taxes:
Sales Tax ~1,579,580 $104,267 ~1.520,070 96 ~1,465,488 92
Sub-Total $1,579,580 $104,267 $1,520,070 96 $1,465,488 92
In te rgovernmen ta 1 Revenue:
Revenue Sharing and
F edera 1 Grant $ 2,826 $ 710,500 94 State Grant
State Shared Revenue 11 ,sao 11 1 427 100
Sub-Total $ 14,326 0 0 0 $ 721,927 94
Miscellaneous:
• Interest $ 23,500 $ 36,717 156 $ 62,626 75 Contributions 12,000 80 Other 17,156 17,796 ~ {202) _Q
Sub-Total $ 40,6 56 0 $ 54,513 134 $ 74,424 58
Total Revenues $1,634,562 1104,267 ~1.574,583 ..2§_ ~2.261,839 91
Cumulative Expenditures Project Balance Budget Current Month to Date Available
Storm Dr ainage :
Genera 1 $ 363,002 $ 699 $ 362,275 $ 727 North Cen tral II 636,500 5B9,834 46,666
Paving Dfstrfct #22 6,100 6,027 73 I Improvements • • • Dartmou th 124,000 606 17,170 106,830 ,
0
. , • '32xl
• ,._
-•.
• C• -
~ .. ~ )-. --. ~-
Realization of Budgeted Revenues
Public Impro vement Fund
Through November 31, 1976
Page 2 •
Cumulative Expenditure s Project Balance
Budget Cur_rent f4onth .t!' Date Avail a~
Sidewalk District $ 15,000 $ 0 $ 15,000
Traffic Improvements 110,000 100,643 9,357
Inters ection Dip s 13,265 0 .13,265
Parks: ' Bell ev iew Storm Repair 50,000 0 50,000
Be 11 eview West 150,051 2,978 132,466 17,585 N. W. Greenbelt 311 '309 311,307 2 S. W. Greenbelt 112,250 3,408 109,522 2,728
Interchang e 110,640 110,640 0 Emers on Mini Park 15,000 11 '181 3 ,819
Land Purcha s e 2,000 2,000 0
River Redevelopmen t 2,248,941 16,309 1,715,206 533,735
.. eenhouse 36' 100 1,490 35,972 128
Tennis Courts 119,713 253 116,249 3,464
Fire Training Facility 80,000 80,000 0
Rescue Unit 21 '100 21 • 091 9
Elderly Housing Canst. 2,362,067 66,048 2,405,240 (43,173)
Police/Fire Demolition 15,000 12,130 2,870
Senior Center 180,000 168 70,577 109,423
Library Expan s ion 10,000 10,000 10,000 0
Land Purch as e Nea r
Elderl y Housing Site 45,600 45,463 137
$7 '137 ,638 $101,959 16,264,993 1872,645
• • I • •
0
'
•
•
........J
•
• to
•
~ .~-~----------------~~ -
Portion of Year to Date ~
•
Disposal Service
Other:
Connection Fees-Inside
Connection Fees-Outside
Interest
Gain on Sale of Assets
Inspection Charges
Miscellaneous
Sub-Total
Total Revenues
Treatment
Sanitary System
Administration
& General
Total Expense
•
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
REALIZATION OF BUDGETED REVENUES
SEWER FUND
Through November 31, 1976
Budgeted Current Year to Revenue 14onth Date
$ 645,750 $ 76,407 $ 717,325
10,000 8,563 74,374
312,500 49,434 411,592
30,000 56.171
16 3,000 290 8,158
7,000 -3,186 14,416
$ 362,500 $ 61,473 $ 564,727
~1.008,250 $137,880 ~1.282,052
EXPENDITURES TO 1976 BUDGET
Annual
Budget
$307,932
67,581
339,933
$715,446
. .....
Current
Expenditures
$19,786
6,498
18,319
$44,603
Year to Date
Expenditures
$256,609
58,513
422,862
P37 ,984
'
•
% of Last Last Budget Year Year Collected to Date _%_
111 $612,314 105
744 9,274 87
13 2 135,224 99
18 7 54,607 68
0
272 3,552 97
206 22z626 89
156 $225,283 88
127 ~837 ,597 lQQ.
Last Last
I of Year Year
fulil.9..e.t. to Date J._
83 $221,432 91
87 47,704 92
ill. 243,653 56
lQl 1512,789 70
. ,
•.
..
I • •
0
f
•
•.
0 I •
•
n
Portion of Year to Date ~
• DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
REALIZATION OF BUDGETED REVENUES
Through WATER FUND
November 31, 1976
% of Last Last Budgeted Curren t Year to Budget Year Year Rev enue t·1onth Date Collected to Date _%_
Water Sales $1,353,465 $157,637 $1,337,216 99 $1,003,311 97 Other:
Connection Charges 55,800 7,770 63,412 114 35,415 109 .. Renta 1 s 2,535 150 10,018 395 4,883 69 Interest 10,000 0 4,613 46 5,362 0 Gain on Sale of Assets 0 64 0 50 0 Sale of Water 150,000 0 12,000 8 24.190 100 Miscellaneous 25,000 12,420 24,779 99 28,125 __§Q Sub-T otal $ 243,335 $ 20,340 $ 114,886 47 $ 98,025 99
Total Revenues $1,596,800 $177,977 $1,452,102 91 ~1.1 01,336 97
EXPENDITURES TO 1976 BUDGET
Last Last Annual Current Year to Date %of Year Year Budget Ex~enditures Ex2enditures Budget to Date _%_
Source & Supply $ 193,574 $47,981 $134,643 70 $251,200 94
Power & Pumping 173,611 10.130 132,423 76 105,786 90
Purification 141,561 10,338 130,253 92 116,007 92
Trans. & Dist. 157,234 14,056 145,499 93 181,808 100 • Meter Reading and
Collection 64,396 2,916 56,684 88 46,453 82
General 343,800 4,735 226,431 66 233,173 1§_
I • • • • Tota 1 Expense $1,074,176 $90,156 ~825,933 1l ~934,427 67
~
0
'
•
-
(
•
•
•
0 .. -
3 E
~ E M 0 R A N D U M ------·---------
TO:
FROM :
DAT E:
SUBJECT:
Andy McCown, City Manager
Richard A. Lo rig, Personnel Director
December 7, 1976
Annual Conference of the International Personnel
Management As soc iation
November 28 to December 2, 1976 marked the conference days for the
International Personnel Man agement Association in Washington D.C.
\--
The conference was attended by approximately 1,000 delegates, spouses
and other governmental officials from the United States, Canada and
several other foreign countries. 575 of those present were full
voting delegates such as myself.
The emphasis this year was on "retrospect" and "prospect" in the field
of perso nnel man agement. The track system of programming was used
with major theme tracks as follows: a.) The Status of Merit
b.) The Management Challenges of Retrenchment c.) The Crisis in
Government Labor-Management Relations. Also included in the confer-
ence were section meetings for the Organization of Municipal
Personnel Officers and these dealt directly with municipal problems
anc concerns. A new addition to the program this year was meetings
for special interest groups such as employment, labor relations and
classification specialists. All in all,this year's conference attempted
to serve the needs of the personnel professional in all areas of
government.
Th e Organization of Mun icipal Personnel Officers met both on Sunday
and Mon day on a variety of topics such as EEOC Guide line s, Discrim-
i nation Suits and Man power Programs. All of the subjects directly
related to the City of Englewood either in problems we have or in
ones that we have solved. It is interesting to note that in so
many areas our city ha s advanced farther than most jurisdictions and
can effectively give advice to much l arger organizations. I
personally had several reque sts for copies of our collective bargaining
amendment , IPA grant application and self insurance fund information.
The OMPO also put on a general meeting on EEOC guidelines with
Peter Robertson, Director of Federal Liaison EEOC,as guest speaker .
At the general session on the Status of Merit, Arnold Weber, Provost
of Carnegie-Mellon University,tal ked on the decline and possible
dissolution of the merit principles. This lead into a panel pre-
sentation with Hollis Bach of Aurora, Colorado, giving the municipal
story on merit systems. Part of his speech was exerpts taken from ideas
of several local personnel directors, myself included. It is
frightening to hear how professionals feel that merit systems are no
longer feasible and should be totally dropped. One major reason
· . . . •
.• \ !
'!
I • •
f
•
•
•
Annual IPMA Conference
December 7, 1976
page 2 -
•
-
, .
I•
for their th inking is federal intervention that is becoming more and
more preva lent. Past Colorado State Personnel Director , Bill Hilty,
talked on federal intervention and related problems present in the
State of Colorado.
Management challenges of Retrenchment was looked at from the view
of productivity planning. The panel d iscussions looked at productiv-
ity from the man agement and union sides. Nancy Hayward , Director
of Public Sect or Programs, National Center for Productivity and
Quality of Working Life, gave very good examples of how both sides
could work together a nd achieve better productivity and genera~
employee satisfact ion. She looked to both sides working toward
delivering servic e to the public as the end goal. Ms. Hayward also
suggested area s of performance appraisal, affirmative action, testing ,
etc . that could add productivity out-put of the employee.
Du ring the business meeting an underlying theme of the Association
surfac ed and that dealt with ethics. The Executive Board decided
that a cod e of ethics like the City Managers' should be instituted
a nd will work to prepare a draft for next year's conference. This
topic was impor tant to me since on Wednesday morning I would be
pres enting ideas on ethics for the professional Personnelist along
wit hAl Boyles, Director of Personnel for the State of North Carolina.
The need exists for ethical behavior over and above any legal
restrictions and this need is felt strongly enough to demand punitive
proc edures if not followed.
The last major track was on Labor Relations with presentations by
s uch people as Governor Lucey of Wisconsin and Thomas Donahue,
Assistant to George Meany of the AFL-CIO. It is amazing to hear many
gove rnmental agencies talk fearfully about labor relations. Englewood
and its charter and ordinance are far advanced from most jurisdictions.
Too many have no real u nderstanding of what labor relations are and
how to effectively handle them . Often our charter is pointed to as
the majo r innovation in the field of labor-relations and can give
the public the pow er to decide the services for which they must pay.
The final programs dealt with special interest groups. Unfortunately,
since the size of our jurisdiction warrants that a small personnel
group perform all the functions, such as testing, classification,
labor re lations, affirmative action, etc., I could only attend two
of these sessions . In the future the Association is looking to more
programming both at the conference and in nationwide training programs
for special interest groups .
In closing , I would like to thank the City Council for the opportunity
to atten·d this conference . The sessions, the opportunity to talk
about Englewood, renewi ng old acquaintances and making new ones made
for a pleasant, rewarding experience. (\) -(' r
\_1. ~-t_£...cJ/ l i -~)
RICHARD A. LORIG
Personnel Director
RAL/bjj
'
. , ••
I • •
•• ' r I ' 'r
-
•
•
• t• -
MEMORANDUM
TO: Andy McCown, City Manager
FROM: Charles B. Carroll, Jr., DirectrJr of Utilities
DATE : December 2, 1976
SU BJECT: Encroachment Agreement
The attached encroachment agreement concerns the approved planned develop-
ment known as ~laza De Medico, in the 3500 block of South Washfnqto~
The developer, Mr. Harvey, proposed to construct facilities on the allel, whi h was vacated b ;; ~ ~ h n, the City retained a sewer li~;se Rt
Th!s ~hment will cover a distance of 44 feet on that sanitary sewer !!!,OlD.
The developer desires to start construction soon so as to be able to erect foundations while he can still work in frost-free ground.
The drawing ¥ferred to in the agreement is not yet prepared; but will be added prior recording the document. .
.)
I might add that the City Attorney has not yet reviewed the agreement;
however I am transmitting a copy to him for his rEview via this memorandum.
t-. .. ( . . -t
·charles B. Carroll, Jr.
CBC/kr
Encl.
cc: City Attorney
I . •
0
.. ,
-
•
•
•
-
~ ti-----------------~~~
/
---
•
\
tNCROACH~ENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMtNT made this ___ day of December, 1976, by a nd
~<tween Wlc lAM L. HARVEY AND P'.ARlLYN C. HARVEY, individuals (hereinafter
·o~nen'' 1 and the CIT Y OF ENGLE~OOO, • Co lorado municipal corporation
(her 1nafter City").
WlTNESSETH ·
WHtREAS owners are the present owners in fee simple of that
realt l ocoed w1tnin the City of Englewood, County of Arapahoe, State
of Colorado, descr ibed as follows, to wit ·
Lots 12 -15; Lots 31 -38 , Block 1
Higgi• s Englewood Gardens,
IMEREAS City has vacated a portion of he alley a dj acent to the
above described property, and, owns an easement for ut 11 i ty purposes,
fifteen feet in w1dth over and across the vacated alley, as recorded
in Book 1659, Page 121, within which City has constructed, and 1s main-
taining, a sanitary sewer, and
WHEREAS Owners are de sirous of encroaching upon and into sa d
easement a distance of approxima tely 44 feet fo• the purpose of erecting
and constNct i ng an improvement upon said realty. the approximate location
01 said improvement in relation to said easement being reflected on the
drawing attached he reto,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual grants and covenants
herein contained, it is mut ually agreed as follows :
1. City agrees to, and does hereby, grant to Owners t he permission
and right to en c roach upon and into that easement herei nabove described a
distance ot approximatelt forty-fou r (44) feet, in the manner reflected on
the attachment hereto for the purpose of con>tructing within said encroach-
ment and improvement.
ln consideration of the grant of said permiss ion and right,
Owners agree :
a . That, prior to Owner's c0111'M!ncement of construction detailed
plans therefor, i nsofar as said construction shall encroach uoon
said ea semen t, shall be submitted" to the Director of Utilitie
of the City.
-1-
•
..... ~-)-
'
tJ
I • •
.·
I
'!'
• !
--.
•
•
Attest :
•
• , .
•
b. That Owners shall reonove that portion of the sanitary si!WI!r
under sald en croacll!lent, as well as a distance of flve feet on
either s l de of sold 44 foot encroachnent; and shall replace
sald clay ptpe wlth ln cast lron plpe protected by concrete
en casement for the entire length of the en croac twwnt plus five
feet on either end of sald encroa chnent .
c. Tha t Owners shall not, e i ther during the tlme of construciion
or thereafter, damage, or otherwise i nterfe re wlth the City 's
sanitary sewer main, except for the replacement thereof, or
the co ntinuous operati on of sold system, and Owners agree to
hold Clty hannle ss from any expenses or costs which might be in-
curred by Clty as a r esult of any damage or interference by
Owners thereto .
OWNERS
~-------------------
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
By -----------------
Cl ty Cl erk-Treasurer
-2-
• .
·-·-~'
f •• -_,
"·
I • •
0
.•
' r I
'!
•
•
~;i~
-''IlTle
_. (i
_j
•
\ ,__ ___
' European
Heolth
Spo
•
-
--
' I
,-.:
U)
• •
•
•
• I•
•
-~ ~~----------~--
(
•
MEMORAND UM
TO: Karl Nollenberger, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Charles B. Carroll, Jr., Director of Utilities
DATE: December 2, 1976
SUBJECT: Gas Service Easement
Attached is a gas service easement for the ga s distribution system at the Bi-City Pl1M:.
The Cities chose to have Puh11c Service Compan,v extend the distribution
system at their cost fn lfey of installing ft ourselves and installing one master gas meter
Mr. Ernie Herbertson will have to be co-grantor for easement fl. as the ~ity has a 35 year lease on that property.
Charles B. Carroll, Jr .
CBC/kr
Attachment
'
•.
J
4 8
'
• •
0
. ' \ r
or
•
• (
•
0 z
0
~
0
~
fOtU!l 1C •lO.IO.UII
Correct
•
-
UTILITY EASEMENT
..
IITAifill P'fiMAfir1Bifn1'
I
Plot No. l-346-43R
. Document No . _,8c;,9y06!L~>-----
The unden+gned Grantor hereby a .. noNiedges rece .pt of S 1.00 --------------------ff'Om PUBLIC SERVICf
COMPANY Of COlORADO ·n ccons•deratiO n of whteh he hereby gra111:. unTo satd CoMp&n'/ cts su cceuors and nsigns,
an easement to construct Of>""' ·•e and m a .nt~un utt •t ly i+nes and a ll fow:•urtos and de-I•Ce$, used or useful 1n the
opera'+on of sa •d Io nes. t hrOl.'Qh, over, under, Mron and a long a cour'>e as u•d •nes m ay be hereafter constructed '"
lot __ Block Subd•v •s ·on
m the -:-illLu.J:U:.~-:-!-'"'---~-----:----:---~ of Secz.on .-lJ.._, Township &.....s.ou.th.. ,
Range ...6ILW.ell_ Princ 'p at Mer•d +an tn the C•tt of Eng lpwnnd , County
of~ . S tat~ o f Cooor•do the approx tm<~t c C."'f\ter J.ne of th~ eo~ement s de Kr~bed as follow~o .
EA SEMEN T NlJ4BER 1
COiiiendng at the NW corner of the NE l/4 of Section 33, Township 4 South, Range 68
West; thence S. 59 °8'34 " E, a distance of 1480.13 feet to the true point of beginning;
Thence S. o•g•ss• W. a distance of 331.05 feet ; thence S. 45°9'58 " W. a distance of
33.98 feet; thence S. 88°52'58" W. a distance of 532 feet more or less to the easterly
right-of-way of South Platte River Drive.
EASEMENT NlJI!ER 2
C011111enc1ng at the SW corner of the SE 1/4 of the NE l/4 of Section 33, T4S, R6811,
thence N. 0°07' w. along the west line of the SE l/4 NE l/4 of Section 33 a distance of
300.00 feet; thence N. 89°52' W. a distance of 14 .42 fee t to the true point of beginning;
Thence H. 04 °24 ' E. a di s tance of 80.06 feet; thence S. 8 9°11' W. a distance of
14g.z5 feet; thence N. 0°49' W. a distance of 230.38 feet ; thence N. 89°11' E. a distance
of 220 feet to a po i nt of tenninus .
EASEMENT NIM!ER 3
C-clng at the NW corner of the NE l/4 of Section 33, Township 4 South, Range 68
West, thence S. 59°08'34" E. a dis tance of 1480.13 feet;
Thence N. 00"09'58 " E. a distance of 222.87 feet; thence N. 87 °41 '58 " E. a distance
of 39.45 feet to the true point of beginning; thence N. 57•41 '58" E. a distance of 45 5
feet to 1 point of tennfnus .
S;ud e asement 1s Ten (] O) feel '" w•dth
,_
Together w1th the r ogl.t 10 enlf~f upon saud premise!!., \urv&y cons.Hvlt ..,.,a,nla•n. o pera•e re~or , replace, con-
rrof and use u 1d u h lttv !.nets and relared flll:lures and dev.ces and tQ remove ot e<:." ontef'f er•ng therew1th, ~ndud
'00 lhe tr•mm.ng o f trees and bushes and 1ogether wtlh !he ngh1 to use ~ much ot tt-.to ~1o n.ng prel"''•l.eS of Grantor
duong surveymg, c:ons.trvcl•on, m a ntenance , repi!!tf , removd l. or re p:aceonent of sad ..,! •'''I .nes and related fut·
tur~1 and dev.caK .n m ay be reqvued to perm1t 1he o perat•OI'l of st•ndard ut• ,,., con T~urJoOn or rep.e•r mKhmery,
and rhe ught to perm•! the .nsta ll aT.on of the fa c•lmes of any other com pany rn. Gr.mor '~'""" the nght to
us.e and occupr uld pr&m •ses for any purpose conststent W+lh the r,ght •nd P' v.leg~ a~o~e granted ind .wh•ch wtll
not +nterfer e With or end•~r any of the Uid <.ompany s factlit•e' there n Of vw the'reof Sv~ rr-wrvot10n by the • ,
1 ~·;~~, ;:~~~.:t ~notoelc:!~':~vde~len ~otr~i~ :;i~·~,!n~ne~~~t~ ~·;!.~f' .b::d:,'::!n~~t ~~ ;~~;
of way oil ri9ht, prtvi&.ge and intered he rein granted sholl te rm+note.
The work o f tnstalhng sa1d lt nes and related f•·dures and devtees ,hall be done w th ure the surf.c:e along
U id nght-of w•y shall be-reuored substantially to 11s oog·nal level and cond+hon
Grantor'· shall lnclud~ the plura l and the fem mine
Signed thts -------day of _________ , 19 _
WITNE SS ES GRAN TO R CITY Of ENG! FIIOOO
STATE OF COlORADO, ) "
County of )
The foregomg ·nstr ument was ad:nowledged before me ttus
d1y of • 19 by • ________________ _
My cornm•\siOn elCpues,--:---:------
W ttn,.ss my hand olf'd offtcta 1 seal
•
Notary P\Jbhc I
• ...
-
-
= ~L
~; \
..
•
..
• ..
•
"' . [ 7 1 II ::,
..! r
r ·rp·~J.!!' I -
il
' I
. --· --~-----' ---
-!,
------------.--·--
" -------------
.. • •
•
•
•
•
-~ ~--~-----------= T
•
5 A
RESOL U1ICN NO. ~ SERIES OF 1976
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISH ING ANNUAL SALARIES FOR THE CITY MANAGER,
CITY ATTORNEY AND MU.ICIPAL COURT JUDGE .
WHEREAS, the Clty Council has by Resolution No.
Series of 1976, amended the 1976 annual budget and adopted
the same by Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, said City Council h as by Ordinance, passed
and approved the l97 (7 appropriatlon for all municipal pur-
poses, including annual salaries for Council appointees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
1. That consistent with the budget heretofore approved
and the appropriations to the general fund of the City relative
to salaries, the following annual salaries are hereby established
for appointees of City Council for the calendar year 19 7'7 to-wit: 1
ATTEST:
City Manager •.•....•••••.•••.......... $31,400.00
City Attorney •......•.••••.•.......... 29,410.00
Municipal Court Judge................. .;( 7, S{;O
Associate Judge....................... 1/0~
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 20th day of December, 1976.
MAYOR
ex offic1o City Clerk-Treasurer
I, William D. James, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
of the City of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that the
-1-
)-
• •
0
•
• •
~ ~--~----------~ T -J-\~
above and foreg o ing is a true, accurate and complete copy
of Resolution No. , Series of 1976.
ex off~cio city Clerk-Treasurer
• -2-I • •
0
'
f 32xl . , •
•
•
•
• -
!:--
TOt Andy McCown, City Manager DA.,., December 16, 1976
~ Kells Waggoner
sua.IICT1 LITTI.E DRY CREEK
Recently, the firm of Sellards & Grigg, Inc, completed an alternative
development study for the Little Dry Creek area within the city limits
of Englewood. The hand-out recaps of the report are now r e ady to be
printed and we can procee d with establishing dates, etc. for t h e
public presentations on the alternatives, Attached hereto LS a map
showing what I would consider an area where we might concentrate our
first efforts for dissemination of the information.
What we might call "the public" in this outlined area varies considerably,
in that we have rental spaces occupied by mobile homes and their inhabi-
tan t5 . We have rental spaces fo r small businesses such as the lower
lev 1 of Cinderella City; we have r e sidential area, both owner-occupL e d
and rentals; we have businesses with leases where the owner may or may
not be in the area; and we have apartment buildings with many tenants,
all of which are residents o f the City of Englewood and within the
outlined area . We also have school s and medical facilities within the
area.
The following could be a schedule to c o v er the i n formation series for
this area:
THURS DAYS a 7:3 0 p.m.
JAN. 6th -residential area north of Floyd Ave. ~ wes of Bannock
(MON.) JAN . lOth-School Board
JAN. 13th -residential area east o f Bannock and west of Log a n
JAN. 20th -MAYOR'S COFFEE
JAN. 27th -residential area between Logan & Clarkson
FEB. 3rd -Chamber of Commerce & busines s people--lessees & lessors
FEB. lOth & 17th-open meetings for other interested citizens
in the City of Englewood outside of the outlined area
£_ublicity for meetings would be by newspaper and The Fn g l a t.nod Ci tiaeR .
•
JJ>-
•
/ \
'
I • •
0
•
•
•
•
•
-a
Andy McCown, City Manager -2-December 16, 1976
During t h is schedule, we could also make presentations to any of the
service clubs at their luncheon meetings --these meetings fall on
various days of the week.
One of the problems which could occur after we start an informational
series such as the above-mentioned would be the push from landowners,
building owners, and those people who are now occupying the buildings,
etc. to proceed with a solution; when, indeed, we do not know at thi s
time how soon we could fund any of the alternative solutions to the
flooding problem.
~~~~----
Director of Public Works
KW/ls
Attach .
" -
• .
j \
I • •
0
. ,
,.
0 -
• ~p) Ia c.
~"o :t~,. ,..<:
:!!
,.., -,..
Q ~3 i '~ ~.(
Ell t1 ~ iji ~ t
I ~
• h. = t:
' ------__ , __ _
•
•
• •
•
• }II -
-
-..... ~--)-
MEMORAND UM
To: Andy McCown, City Manager
From: William D. James, Direc or of Finance
Karl Nollenberger, Assistant City Manager J. Date: December 16, 1976
Subject: Budget Status Report
General Fund :
We have rev iewed with each deparm1ent head their anticipated total expenditures
for 1976. There are only two bud ge ts that wi l l exceed their 1976 ap propriations,
Purchasing and City Co uncil. Purchas ing will exceed their present budget by
approximate ly $8,300 due to the publ ic officials liability insurance coverage
which protects City Council members and other admin istrative officials of the
City from being sued on an individual basis. This insurance policy was taken
out on he rec ommendation of the Ci t y's insurance consultant. City Council will
exceed their bud get by app roximately $8 ,000 as a result of printing the "Engl ewood
Cit izen " on a mon thl y bas is rather than ev ery other month and increased printing
co sts. None of these add itional costs have been amended to date to either one
of these accounts an d are not included in the original bud get estimates .
We have also re viewe d the revenues for the General Fund. Sales tax for the
mont h of November increased 20 % over No vember 1975 . If our revenue estimates
hold true, we should realize an additional $180,000 in revenues over the
estimate made last summe r. Th is is basically in the a r ea of sales and use tax, c i garet te tax , and Bi-City use tax.
Se wer Fund :
The City has received a grant from EPA to investi gate the reduction of chlorine
and ammo nia tox icity . This was approved by City Council through Resolution
No. 24, Ser ies of 1976, au thorizing the Ci t y Manager to exec ut e all official
doc uments to apply for the grant . The total grant is for $146,900, of which
the f ederal gov ern ment will pay 75 %, or $110,175, and the Citi es of Englewood
an d Li ttl eton will con tr ibute $18,363 each. Since we have received this grant,
we need to amend the Se wer Fund budget .
PI F Sub -Fun d (Elderly Housing Cons ruction Project):
The Ci ty of Eng lewoo d contribu t ed $159,000 to the PIF Housing Account for the
basemen t of the elderly housing project. The Housing Account is separ ate
from the Sub-Fu nd for construction of the entire project in the PIF Fund.
Inadver tently, $159 ,000 wa s encumbered as an expend iture in the Sub-Fund
•
I . •
0
f
-
•
•
• •
•
Andy McCown, City Manager
Page 2
December 16, 1976
•
• -t•
• ..... ,. 2!
last year and was never appropriated to the Sub-Fund. The $159,000 was
realized as revenue last year in the Sub-Fund and, therefore, is not
reflected as a source of funds in the attached resolution. It should be
noted that this adjustment is only a result of incorrect accounting
entries made to these two accounts and does not increase the appropria-
tion originally intended by City Council.
The Housing Authority has also contributed $55,000 this year for additional
expenditures on the pro ject. This money should also be appropriated to the
PIF Sub-Fund.
These are the only changes that will need to be made to the 1976 annual
budge t. All other accounts should be within th eir original appropriation.
A resolution making these suggested changes is attached.
Wi 11 i am D. 'dames
Director af Finance
Attachment
kv
I
/ ~;,_ I 1\\oiJ~ (..\~
Karl Nollenberger
Assistant City Manager
•.
I . •
0
•
•
•
•
• I•
•
RESOLUTION NO. /t![. SERIE S OF 1976
A RESOLUTIO N AMENDING THE 1976 BUDGET IN THE GENERAL FUND, SEWER FUND, AND
THE PUBLI ' IMPROVEMENT FUND CONSTRUCTION SUB-FUND.
WHEREAS, City Coun c i l ha s approved a 1976 budget for the General,
Sewer, and Public Improvement Fund s; an d
WHE REAS, additiona 1 eXJ >e'ldi tu res have been i ncurred in the Genera 1
Fund for public officials liability insurance coverage in the amount of
$8,300; and for additional operating expenditures in the City Council's
budget of $8,000; and
WHEREAS, the City of Englewood has received a 201 Grant from EPA
for investigating the r eduction of chlorine and aovnonia toxicity in the
amo unt of $146,901; and
WHEREAS, City Council has approved an appropriation in the amount
of $159,000 for construct i on of the basement for the elderly housing project;
an d
WHEREAS, the Housing Authority ha s contributed an additional
$55,000 to construction of the elderly housing project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLV ED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follow s .
Sect ion 1 -General Fund:
The following estimated revenues and appropriations are hereby
ma de in the General Fund.
Source of Funds
Fund Balance
Appropriations
City Council
Purchasing
ec ion 2 -Sewer Fund:
$16,300
8,000
8,300
$16,300
The following esti mated re ven ues and appropr·ations are her eby
made in the Sewer Fund.
Source of Funds
Retain ed Earnings
EPA Gran t
City of Littleton
Appr op riations
Treatment
'
$ 18,363
110,175
18 ,363
$146,901
$146.901
..
I . •
0
·' I !
' 'r
-
•
•
•
•
• I •
•
Q •
Sec tion 3 -PI~ Sub-Fund:
Th e following estimated revenues and appropr i ations are hereby
made in t~e PIF Sub-Fund (construction for elderly housing project).
Section 4:
Source of Funds
Housing Authority
Fund Balance
App r op riations
$ 55,000
159 ,000
$214,000
$214,000
The City Manager and Director of Fin ance are her eby aut hori zed t o
make the abov e changes to the 19 76 budget of t he Ci t y of Englewo od .
ADOPTED AND APPROV ED this 20th day of De cembe r, 1976 .
ATTEST : Mayor
ex officio Ci ty Cl erk-Treasurer
')
I, Willi am D. J ame s, ex officio City Cl erk-Treasure r of the City of
Englewood, Col orado, do hereby certify that the above and fo regoi ng is a t rue,
accurate and complet e cop y of Reso l ution No. __ , Ser i es of 19 76.
ex of fi c io City Clerk-Tr easuret·
-2-
•.
I . •
0
-
. ,
•
•
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
•
• •
Andy McCown, Ci t y Manager
Karl Nollenberger, Assistant City Manager
December 16, 1976
Police and Fire Pension Legislation
There has been a lot of attention given in the past year
to police and fire pension funds in the State of Colorado.
I am enclosing co pies of the final proposal of the study
committee as well as my own analysis of the overall
problem for your reading.
I recognize that the analysis is lengthy but unless one
has been involved in the pension funds for the past five
years, it is difficult to know all the problems. Hopefully
this whole paper relate the problems adequately.
Karl Nollenberger
Assistant City Manag e r
KN/sb
Enclosures
• .
I • •
0
. , '
• I
•
•
•
•
-
-•
COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
POLIC E AND FIRE CONSOLIDATED PENSION FUND
OUTLINE OF KEY ELEMENTS
· 1 r: C F i V ;:· f .. -~ ~
Cril r.:AN ~ i:il! Li:~,r;~
[~;, _; Uti
The fund will be known as THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONSOLIDATED POLICE AND FIRE
PENSIO N FUND and is referred to herein as the CPFP or consolidated fund.
2. Program Description
The CPFP fund concept provides a long-term solution to police and fi re
pension problema through natural attrition. Employees covered by local
pension programs are free to remain in their local plan p roviding t h e y do
not change employers. If they change employers, they then move into the
consolidated fund. New emplo yees of police and fire depa rtments after the
effective date of t he act will mandatorily participate in the consolidated
f und. Wi thin about 30 years, all active police and fire personnel will be
members of the CPFP fund. Contributions to the CPFP fund mu st f ully fund
the pension program on an actuarial basis. Local governments have the
option to exceed the basic benefit plan providing they pay increased local
contributions to cover the costs of s uch benefits. The consolidated fund
would provide identical benefits to both police and fire personnel regard-
less of the size of the jurisdiction. Local pension plans would continue
to operate in order to service existing employees and retired personnel.
Furthermore, the local pension board would decide all dis ability retire-
ments for existing employees and new personnel covered under the CPFP fund .
The CPFP fund would be controlled by local officials and employees. The
consolidated fund is not simply one large central fund where all employers
and employees contribute the same amount and are locked in to the same
benefits. Rather, the CPFP fund is merely a grouping of separately admin-
istered accounts. Each employer is responsible for providing retirement
benefits to its own employees. The contribution rates of one city are not
affecte d by the bad experiences of another.
3. Par ticipation
I
a. Af ter the effective date of the act, all newly-hired police and fire
personnel would be required to participate in the CPFP fund.
b. All police and fire personnel chan ging employers after the effective
date of the act would be treated as new employees by their new employer
and would consequently participate in the CPFP fund. Prior years of
service would be credited to the employee towards retirement under the
CPFP f und •
c. Municipalities or fire districts wishing to bring all of their employees
under the CPFP fund could do so providing unfunded liabilities on
•
...
) \
·.
• I
• I !
'r
I • •
. .
•
•
•
•
0 -
-12
grandfachered employees are pa~d for by the em ployer in addition to
the normal costs. Employers could take up to farcy years to amortize
their actuarially determined unfunded liabilities. Assets of local
pension plans would be trans ferred to the empl oyer's account in the
CPFP fund to help offset unfunde d liabilities .
4. Special Features
a. Portabil i ty or transferabilicy of pension benefits is great ly improved .
All personnel covered by the CPFP fund have comolete portability of
accrued benefit s whenever they change participating employers and as
often as they change employers.
b. Curre nt employees who c hange employment after the effec tive date will
be treated as new hires and will consequently be under t he CPFP func.
Such employees will have their years o f previous s ervic e credited towards
retirement. The employer who hires employees with prior service shall
be liable for funding such s ervice, similar to present law.
c. Vesting is an added feature that is not currently available under existing
statutes. The CPFP program vesting provision meets the feder a l ERISA
standards. After 10 years of se rvice the employee would be fully vested.
If an employee terminates prior to serving 10 yea r s, the emplo yee would
receive a full re fund on employee contributions plus 5% simple interest
after a 90-;"' waiting period. Should the employee become eligible for
participation within two years of termination and if such employee had
withdrawn his cont ributions , the employee would have to buy back int o the
program by returnin an amount equivalent to the refunded contributions
plus 5% interest. After a break in active service beyond 2 years, the
employee could not be credited with any prior service time toward
retire nt, but would nter the consolidated fund as a new e~ploy
5. f?FP Fund Basic
(The benefit d ciaion re made on a tentative basis only, pendin a co t
analysis. If th anal ai indicate cos t of these benefits are exc sive,
modification of enefit levela will be necessary.)
a. Retirement benefits shall be accrued at the rate of 2% of final averag
salary for each full year of service for the first 25 years w~th an ddi-
tional 1% of salary for each year of service thereafter to a maxi urn of
of 65% o f final average salary. Employees must be 55 years of age to
receive benefits. Final average salary means the average monthly salary
for the 36 consecutive months immediately preceding retirement or
termination of employment.
b. Th e survivor's benefit for a job-related death shall equal 35% of the
employee's salary at time of death. Survivor ~eans spouse or ch~ldren.
In the event there is no surviving spouse, the children, if any, shall
each receive an equal share of the s urvivor's benefit. Each child's
share shall continue until marr iage , death, or age of 19, whichever
occurs first . If a surviving spouse remarries, the bene fit is terminated
for both the spouse and the children.
-2-
•
1'-
\
..
I • •
•, I
•
•
•
•
, .
•
w
c. The survivor's benefit upon death of a retired member shall equal 70%
of the actual benefit being paid to the deceased prior to death. The
benefit shall be paid or terminated as provided in paragraph S.b.
d. The benefit payable for a non duty-related death of an active employee
shall not exceed 70% of what the individual would be entitled to receive
had he been eligible for retirement at his time of death. To be eligible
for the 70% benefit, the individual must have 10 years of service.
For periods less than 10 years, the individual accrues a vested non
duty-related death benefit at the rate of 10% a year. For example, the
non duty-related death of an employee who served 5 years would equal
50% of the 70% maximum benefit or 35% of the pension the individual
would have been entitled to receive had he been eligible for retirement.
e. Duty-related disability shall be compensated at 50% of salary after a
6-month waiting period. The employer would be morally but not statutorily
responsible for providing income replacement during the waiting period
in the form of short-term disability insurance, sick leave accumulations,
or through self-insurance. The central fund would carry the individual
after 6 months until his recovery as determined by the local board. After
2 years, the local pension board would be given authority to determine if
the employee could be educated or trained to perform some other occu-
pation, which would yield at least the same level of income the employee
would receive as a police officer or fire fighter were it not for the
disability. Upon attaining acceptable enployment the board would have
the discretion to reduce or discontinue disability payments. During the
time of disability, CPFP fund benefits would be coordinated with other
employer sponsored programs such as social security, workmen's compensation,
or income replacement plans so that pension funds would not be used to
provide more than 100% of actua l salary. f_
f. Non duty-related disabilities shall be compensated at a rate not exceeding
35% of salary after 10 years of service. Vesting for the benefit will
accrue at the rate of 10% per year just as the benefit for non duty-
related death in paragraph S.d. A waiting period of 6 months is required
before benefits become payable. As with on the job disabilities, the CPFP
fund will coordinate other city-sponsored benefits to insure that pension
funds are not used to provide more than 70% of salary.
g. The CPFP fund will not mandate that local governments provide escalation
benefits. However, the option to provide a cost of living escalator
under the CPFP fund will be permitted. The maximum annual cost of living
increase allowed would be 4-1/2%. Unlike all other local option benefits,
: -costs for this one benefit shall be borne equally by the state, the
employer and the employee. All other local option supplemental or aug-
mented benefits shall be funded entirely from local employer and employee
contributions.
6. Contribution Rates
a. Contributions to the CPFP fund shall be actuarially determined at least
every three years for each employer.
-3-
•
...
J \
I • •
,
•
•
•
•
0
•
-
b. The contribu tions required to provide the basic CPFP benefits shall be
divided equally between the state , municipality or district, and the
particip at ing employees. Said costs shall be deter~ined and assessed
as a percent age of pay. The payment of state contributions shall occur
annually in the month of July and shall equal 1/3 of the central f und
pension costs for the preceding calendar year. Other than the optional
cost of living escalator, the state shall only share in the costs of t he
basic benef it package. The employee's con tribution for the minimum
benefits could not exceed 10% of salary.
c. State participation in the funding of existing local pension~rograms
shall increase to a f ull 1/2 mill match for fire departments and shall
change to a full 1/2 mill equivalency match for police departments.
The state shall receive a credit against contributions made to the central
fund in behalf of each employer.
7. CPFP Fund Administration
a. The board would be composed of nine members serving three year over-
lapping terms. Four members would represent public emplo yers of which
at least one member would serve on the board of directors of a fire
district, two members would be police officers, two members would be
fire fighters and one member would represent the state.
b. Responsibilities of the CPFP board ma y include the following:
(1) to ensure the efficient operation of the fund;
(2) to invest pension funds and reallocate interest earnings pursuant
to law;
(3) to require actuarial studies periodically to set contribution rates
subject to appeal by local governments;
(4) to contract for data processing services;
(5) to contract for investment management;
(6) to authorize the voluntary pooling of risks for disability purposes
among small departments;
(7) to purchase insurance or self-insure when cost effective;
(8) to employ a staff to administer the fund and to perform such
related f unctions as the board may authorize;
(9) to apportion administration expens es among the various participants ;
(10) to promulgate procedural rules for the efficient operation of the
fund; and
(11) to provide technical assistance to local boards upon request .
c. The CPFP fund shall be established as an autonomous agency such as PERA.
8. Volunteer Firemen
The CPFP fund will not have jurisdiction over volunteer firemen pension
funds. Local governments and fire districts operating volunteer departments
shall continue to administer their local pension funds. The CPFP fund will
allow prior service credits to volunteer firemen at the rate of one year's
credit for each four years of volunteer service when the volunteer becomes
a paid (ireman . Any needed changes to volunteer pension programs should
take the form of amendments to the existing statutes.
-4-
•
\
. , ·' I !
~
I • •
,
•
•
•
•
• -
-n
ANALYSIS OF
POLICE AND FIRE PENSION FUNDS
IN THE STATE OF COLORADO
Introduction
I•
The Colorado Municipal League has established a committee on
police and fire pension funds in the State of Colorado to delve
into the current statutes and financial affairs of these funds.
As immediate past president of the Colorado Municipal Finance
Officers Association and president of the Colorado Municipal Managers
Assistants Association, I asked to serve on this committee. Appoint-
ments to the committee were made by Ruth Fountain, Mayor Pro Tern
of Aurora, and president of the Colorado Municipal League.
The analysis of the police and fire pension funds covers two
broad areas which interrelate both in substance and time frame of
the study. The first area is the analysis of the current statutes
and problems which exist within those statutes . The substance of
1'-
j
benefits, contributions and administration of police and fire pension
programs were researched and analyzed from a practical point of
view with an eye towards initiating co rrective legislation in the
1977 General Assembly. The entire membership committee consid ered
this a rea while a drafting sub-committee delved into this area in
great depth. The second area concerns a thorough analysis of the
financial status of the pension funds . Many funds throughout the
State have experienced critical situations over the past couple
years in their inability to pay pensions. A financial analysis
was conducted by a financial sub-committee. The analysis concerned
'
. ,
• .
• •
-
•
•
•
•
• •
-
-2-
itself with the cash flow financial i nformation and actuarial study
information which was available. The report on the financial analysis
was made to ~he main committee for their consideration and to deter-
mine what actions were to be taken.
J -
Upon the completion of the detailed work of the two sub-committees
the study committee adopted recommendations to be given to the
Colorado Municipal League Policy Committee. The Policy_ Committee
con sists of representatives from every town in the State of Colorado
who are members of the Municipal League . The Policy Committee will
then make recommendations to the Colorado Municipal League Executive
Board who serve as the ultimate policy making bo a rd for the League.
In the past, the Policy Committee and Executive Board tend to follow
the recommendations of the specific committees study . The ultimate
pr o duct wi ll be leg islation initiated by the Colorado Municipal
League and introduced in the 1977 Colorado General Assembly. Greater
detail of the studi e s of the sub -committees as well as presentation
of the information gathered follow in this report . At the time of
the writ i ng the recommendation by the Committee on Police and Fire
Pensions has been submitted to the Policy Committe e which will meet
on December 16 , 1976 f ollowed by an Executive Board meeting on
December 17 , 1976 . Long-range impact o f the study and its recommenda-
tions will not be known until 1977 when the Colorado Legislature
convenes .
Ba ckgro und
The history of firemen 's and pol i ceme n's pension funds in the
State of Colorado dates back to 1903 when the General Assembly
aut h orized pension benefits for f iremen employed in cities with
over 100 ,000 population which at that time meant the City and County
of Denver . One year later , the s tatute was incorporated in Denver's
'
I • •
0
f a2 x l
•
•
•
•
•
-
-3-
charter by reference and at the same time a Police Department Relief
Fund was cre at ed in the home rule charter. In 1913, nine years
later, the General Assembly enacted a statute requiring a Police
Department Releif Fund for all cities in excess of 100,000 population .
At the same time a supporting mill levy on property was added as
was a one percent salary deduction from the employees in those cities.
In 1917 a state law was enacted whic h provided for firemen's
pens i on f und s in all cities and towns in Colorado with organized
paid or volunteer depar tm ents. In 1927 the General Assembly authorized
policemen 's pension funds in all Colorado cities a nd towns with over
25 ,0 00 population and this was extended to all commu nities with
full -time polic e force in 1937 . State participation in the financing
of the fire pension funds did not begin until 1917 and state partici-
pation in the police pension funds flnancially did not begin until
1935 desp it e the early establishment of the pension legislation on
the books. In 1917 a portion of the revenue collected from a 2%
tax on premium written by foreign and alien insura nae companies in
Colorado (insurance companies incorporated outside the state) was.
designated for distribution in the state's firemen's pension funds .
In 1935 an appropriation of $150,000 was made from the general fund
in the s at e to be distributed to cities with more than 25 ,00 0
p o pul a tio n on the basis of full time policemen employed. In 1937 ,
a stat e l evy of .2 of a mill on all property was established with
t h e proceeds to be distributed to the policemen's pension funds in
al l cities and towns with one or more full time police officers .
Eventually , the annual state appropriation of police pension funds
was established at a constant sum which has increased over time to
$1,450,000 in 1976. Annual support of the firemen 's pension funds
. '
I • •
0
.......
•
•
•
•
-~-
was established as a set amount in 19 55 after the proceeds from the
2% tax on premiums on foreign and alien fire insurance companies
had dropped to only a $178 ,000 per year, and that year the General
Assemb ly set the annual support for the firemen's funds at $~00,00 0.
It has increased over t ime to a level of $2,0 00,000 in 1976. Ho wever,
at the same time, the 2% tax on premiums on foreign and· alien fire
insurance companies has arisen to somewhere in the realm of $1 6,000 ,000
to $18,000,000 .
Although amendments to the state fire and policemen's pens ion
laws have been made over the years, many of the provisions have
remained as they were or i ginally introduced back in 1903 and 1917 .
In 1968, the Legislature commissioned a study by the University of
Colorado Graduate Schoo l of Business Admi nist ration to loo k into
the police and fire pension funds in Colorad~ Dr. Donald Stegall
was named the project direct o r of this comprehensive look at the
police and fire pension funds in the State of Colorado which issued
r e commendations published on December 12 , 1968 . Dr Stegall's
recommendations , while being extremely comprehensive and recommend -
ing an establishment of a central fun d for all pensions in cities
under the 100 ,000 population , met with strong opposit i on from police
and fire interest groups in the State of Colorado . The recommenda -
tions were eventually lobbied to death on the St ate Legislative
level. I have a copy of these recommendations available if
you desire to read them . Many police and fire personnel
still active in the State of Colorado remember the 1968 study and
the 196 9 legislative efforts with great bitterness. The 1968 s tudy
wa s very important that it rec ognized and documented the severe
.
~
. .
•.
I • •
0
·' \ !
l f
~
-
•
•
•
• ...
• I•
•
-
-5-
f i nancial situation of the police and fire pension funds in the state
of Colorad o and can serve to point out the long standing problem
which needs attention in the very near future . One problem with
the 1968 study was that it was performed in the hallowed halls of
academia with no participation by police and fire personnel which
left all these personnel free to condemn it upon its re~ease by
Dr . Stegall.
Pension reform activ ity in the state was not pursued aga i n
unt i l 1973 when the Colorado Mun i cipal League began to reactivate
i n t erest . At the 1973 Colorado Municipal League Conference in
Colorado Springs , a program on police and fire pension in the state
of Colorado was presented by the Colorado Municipal Finance Of ficers
Assoc i ation to the mayors, counc ilmembers , police chiefs and f ire
chiefs. That conference served as a spring board for the establ i sh-
ment of a task force on police and fire pensions . The task force
was comprised o f repre se ntatives such as police officers , f i re
fighte r s, c i ty managers , finance officers , and personn el directo r s.
Numerous funding alternatives were discussed b y the task force as
were other elements in an overall reform o f p e ns i on stat u tes. Many
members of the task force had previously b een part o f the 1968 -1 969
project and were st i ll smarting from the rat her com pr e h ensive recom-
mendations for change which were made in that p r oject . Ultimately ,
the 1974 task force made recommendations for 100% state matching of
total local contributio n with a maximum for fire funds of ~ mill
J
of as sessed valuation without escalation (annual increases to retired
individuals) and one mill for those cities with escalat i on and
with a maximum for police funds of 10% of payroll. These recommenda-
tions were the only ones which the task force made preferring to
. '
• •
0
r 32xl
-
•
•
•
•
• •
-
-6-
leave the o ther areas of p e nsion reform unresolved while priority
was placed on the financial problems.
Legislation was introduced in ·the 1974 Legislature which
increased the contributions to the pension funds and yet also
included certain benefit level increases in order to get ".the
endorsement of the police and fire union representatives. The
be nefit of the increases in contributions to the funds were
partially offset by these increases in benefits , however.
)-\
While the legislation did receive some favorable attention in committee
action in the 1974 Legislature , the overall problem was essentially
ignored by the Legislature. The final outcome was one of increases
in the appropriations to police and fire pension funds by a nomina l
$150,000 from $1,300,000 in the police funds to $1,450,000 and $1 ,8 5 0 ,000
in the fire funds to $2,000,00 0 . It should be noted that t h e s e i n -
creases did not even account for inflation for 1975 (13.1 % in the
Denver area) nor consider inflation since the last increase in
contributions.
The Colorado Municipal Le a g ue c o nference in 1976 once again
served as a spring board fo r ini t i a ting activity in the police and
fire p ension reform area. Th e program concerning the overall
finan c ial conditions of the pens i o n f und s was present ed by myself,
as ~h e president o f the Co l orado Mu n icipal Finance Officers Ass oci-
at ion, and Don Mazanec, an ac t uary from A. S . Hansen, Inc. The comments
a t that time tried to expend the c o nsideration of the pension problems fran
'
· . . ,
...
I • •
0
•
•
•
•
•
0 , .
•
-7-
one of a pur ely financial situation to one of looking at the substantive
benefit and contribution level differences between police and fire
pension funds especially as it relates to different population levels.
Th e chart enclosed indicates that these differentials which have
little basis or merit in reality . This program served as the impetus
for the League President to form a committee to furthe~ analyze
pol i ce a n d fire pensions in the State and to make recommendations .
Appointment of Committee
On July 7 , the President of the Colorado Municipal League , Ruth
Fou ntain, Mayor Pro Tem of Aurora , appointed 25 persons to the stud y
comm i ttee on police and fire pensions . The purpose of the committee
was o revie w existing state statutes with an eye towards
developing legislative recommendations and policy considerations
for the 1977 General Assembly. The membership list of the
committee co n s i sted of seven counci lmembers , three personnel
directors , three finance dire ctors , three city managers,
t wo as s istant city managers , two lobbyists , one attorney, two
fire chiefs , one police chief and one actuary. As can be seen,
the membership of the committee was wi de spread covering
almost all disciplines in municipal government . The decision was
made by the Colorado Municipal League to restrict the membersh i p
only to city government offic ials in a management capacity wit ho ut
involving employee unions on the outset. Rather the covering of
bases with the employee representative groups will be accomplished
after the study was finished and recommendations were in hand .
The police and fire pension study committee first met on July 22,
1976 and held its final meetin g on December 2 , 1976 . The
committee began its consideration of the problem on July 22
. -•
' ·. . ,
I • •
0
..' \ !
•
•
•
•
• ,. -
-
-8-
with a review of state statutes and legislative history as presented
by the Colorado Munici pal League staff . A report on the actuar ial
soundness of pension funds was g iven by Don Mazanec , actuary with
A. S . Hansen and Co. In addition a review of the case law, especially
recent supreme court decisions concern ing pensi on funds in the state
of Colorado, was g iven by Susan Griffiths, attorney wi h the League
staff . A summary of the 1974 task force recommendations was made
b y myself with an explanation of the technique of accumulating data
utilized at that time. The membership of the commi tee decided that
a sub -comm ittee on financial analy sis was needed in order to effectively
evaluate the true financial condition of the pension funds in the
state of Colorado . A sub-committee of Don Mazanec and myself was
appointe to evaluate this fi nanc ial condition and actuarial sound-
nes~. The further reporting of the findings of the financial analys is
of the sub -committee are presented later in this report.
The general committee also began analysis of the statutes
which exist in the state of Colorado today on a comparative basis
between police and fire and different population size cities . This
was ac complished beginning wi th a report done by the Municipal League
staff comparing the statutes which had been reorganized by subject
area. The committee spent many ho urs on this particular subject
area .
The rep ort on he financial health o the Colorado pension plans
was made at the comm i ttee meeting on Octo ber 14 at which time the study
committee began to realize the seriousness of the financ ial problem
in the pension funds . As a result of this the s tudy committ ee
appointed a drafting sub-commit ee consisting of Jack Ringleman,
'
••
\
·' \ !
!
• •
0
•
•
•
•
• t• -
-9-
Fire Chief, Boulder; Bob Holmes, Police Chief, Englewood;
Jack Smith. · tto rney, Colorado Springs; Bill Threlkeld, Denver
Police Department Karl Nollenberger, Assistant City Manager, Englewood ;
and Don Mazanec, Actuary, A. S . Hansen & Co. This committee was
charged with the drafting of the more detailed legislation needed
to implement a state-wide pension system for all new hi!es after
July 1, 1977. The determinati on of the committee after reviewing
the financial analysis was that the problem was too severe to
realistically expect additional state and local financial aid
in the next couple years whi ch would help bring pension funds into
any kind of actuarial soundness. Indeed the political consideration
of debate and infighting between the pol ice officers representa -
tives , firefighter representatives , and Colorado Municipal League
could make it impossible to achie ve any legislation in 1977 o r future
years to correct this mammoth problem. I n making the compar ison s
b et ween t he police and fire pension funds and benefit contributions
differentials between population sized cities it became readily
apparent to the committee that the best solution was a new pensio,n
fund to accomodate all new hires after July 1 , 1977 .
For instance, constributions by the employee differ from 5% f or
polic e offi cers in cities under 50,000 to 1% for police officers in
t owns ove r 50,000 to 6% for firefi ghters in towns under 100 ,000 to 3~%
fo r firefighters in t o wns ov e r 100 ,000. This drop in the fire
p e nsion employee contribution o c c urr e d despite the fact that e scala-
tion benefits (automatic incre ases annually in retirement benefits
after retirement) was required only in towns over 100 ,000 . So
while benefits increased as a town went from 99 ,000 to 100,00 0
populat ion, actual cash contributions to the fund decreased leaving
..
I • •
0
•
•
•
• , .
•
-~ ~--~----------~
•
-10 -
the fun d with seri o u s financial problems . Th e current pens i on
contr ib utions in ma n y cases are limi ted to certain level cont r i bu-
tions suc h as in t he police pension funds under 50 ,000 whereby an
employee co ntributi on may not exceed 5% of the police payroll .
When t hese cont ributions are too low to fund the actuartal liabilit i es
f o r t he pension as they are in most cases in the state , the funds
are u l tima t e ly de s tined to inability to make payments to future
pensioner s . Ye t i n t h e case of the police officer fund under 50 ,000
po p ulation, the re i s a prov i s i on i n the statutes which holds the
municipalitie s ul timately responsible for the pension benefits of
the retiree s . Th i s provision does not exist in any of the other
statutes for o t h er s i zed communities or for the f i refighte r s . It
has not y et b een adjudicated as to what happens when the pension
f und eventual ly runs out of cash to supply benefits, but many
cities are r earing that situation. It is of serious concern to
th e cities, and should be resolved prior to such a situation occurring .
Addi t ion al d i screpancies in the statutes provide for age 55
and 2 0 years o f s ervice r etirement for alice officers in t o wns under
50,00 0 and ret i rement at a e 60 wi h 25 years of service for pol i ce
o f f i ce rs i n t owns over 100,000. This com ares to the firefighters
a ge 5 0 wi t h 20 years of servi ~e n owns under 100 ,000 while owns
o ver 100 ,000 r e quire 25 years of service. This discrepancy makes
no s ense in light of the fact tha more dangerous police and fire
situat i ons are normally found in the communities over 100,000
populat i on. As can be seen there is wide discre ancy on
depend e nt children and surviving wido w benefits as well as on
perman ent on t he job a n d off the job disability . Permane nt on the
job and of f the j o b d i sa bility are unrealistic since they are not
based on a ny logical system of benefit structure . For instance ,
. ,
• .
'
• •
0
·. ·' I ! I ;.
-
•
•
•
• ,._
0 I•
•
... -..... ----}--.--\
-11-
the firefight er 's wid ow wi ll receive 33 1/3% of the monthly salary
of a first grade f ireman while a pol ice officer 's wido w i n a town
of o ver 10 0 ,000 would receive $30 per month . The police o ffic er 's
widow in a town under 50 ,000 would receive 25% of the officers
salary , how ever .
It was for thes e reasons that the committee determined that
revision or cons olidation of the existing statutes effecting
current polic e officers and fir e fi ghter3 would be a poli ical
disaster. While some b enef its in any model statute would be
increase d , ther e were other benefit s which would have to e decreased
in order to bring the fin anc ial a nd actuarial costs of any p ens ion
plan onto a lo g ical basis for which municipal ities, the state and
employees could affo rd to fund. While the study committee itself
originally be gan t o work out some of the details of a new statewide
pension plan, it was d etermined that a drafting sub -committee
would b e most helpful in putt ing together these recommen dations.
The study committee met on December 2 for its final meeting at
which time the recommendations fr o m the drafting sub -committee were
received and considered . The key elements were discussed and
altered in certain areas by the study commi tee before f inal adoption .
The key element s will be discussed ater in this report but served
as the recommendation from the study committee to the policy which
wi ll meet on December 16. The study committee contr i buted many
hours of work and effort in order to familiarize themselves with
the particular issues at hand. The final committee action will
probably be accepted by the Policy Committee and referred to the
Executive Board for their adoption on December 17 . Intense lobbying
action of the 1977 Legislature will then begin.
'
• . ,
• •
f
•
•
•
•
0
•
') m -
-12-
Financial Sub -C ommittee Report
At the first meeting of the study committee it was determined
that there was no accurate up-to-date information concerning the
financ ial condition of the police and fire pension funds in the
state o f Co lorado. For this reason, the sub -c ommittee was appointed
by the chairman to assess information available concern ing the
financial status of pension funds and t o then analyze that data
and rep ort back to the sub -committee. The financial sub-committee
consisted of Don Mazanec , an actuary, and myself. The financial
sub-committee met on nume rous occas i ons and did individual back -
ground work into the financial and actuarial soundness of pension
funds in this stat e . It should be noted that financial soundness
d i ffers fr om actuari al soundness and both are relevant conditions
which relate to the study . Financial soundness essentially determines
whether a pension fund is facing immediate cash flow problems where -
by the benefits being paid are subject to possible termination .
At least one pension fund in the State of Colorado , the Denver
Police Pension Fund, has adopted the philosophy of pay -a s -you-go
pension benefits under whi ch the c i ty appropriates monies annually
to pay the benef its of those members of the department on retirement.
The fund retains practically no balance at the end of any year and
if t he City and Council of Denver were to go out of existence or
exp erience sev ere financial conditions, there would be no monies
avai lab le to pay future benefi s for the existing retirees or new
ret iree s . Since the City and County of Denver is committed to
ma king payments to the pension fund on an annual ba is sufficient
to pay the benefits, his fund caul be called financially sound .
The term financial soundness differs greatly from that of actuarial
soundness , however. On an actu rial b sis, a pension fund must have
• •
·' I !
' f
or
•
•
•
, .. -
-
-13-
in its assets at any point in time an amount sufficient to pay the
current ret irees be nefits until their death and an amount equal to
the accured retirement benefits of current members of the force .
In this way, if an city were to go out of existence or incur severe
financial problems at any point i n time , the assets of the fund
would be sufficient to insure all current and future retirees a
sufficient retirement benefit as mandated by the state statutes.
While ac tuarial soundness has been thought to be most important
in pr ivate corporations in the past (corporations have been in the
situation of going bankrupt and leav ing their retirees and employees
wi th no future retirement benefits) the actuarial soundness concept
has been advanced quite actively in the governmental spheres in
recent y ears. The current problems of many of the major cities of
this nation wit h New York City leading the way has shown that
pens ion b enefits can become a heavy burden upon the governments
ability to r emain financially solvent . The condition of being
actuarial unsound in essence only defers the payments for pension
benefits accrued by current employees to future years and onto
future taxpayers. I would argue that the current taxpayers should
be paying the full costs of current police· officers and firefighters
including their future retirement benefits which are being accrued
by the fact that they are on active service today. This future
burden will bring specific problems for cities such as Denver and
even more so for smaller cities where financial resources are not
as adequate or flexible to shoulder this burden. For instance, if
a city of eight firefighers would have a major fire of which six
firefighters went on permanent disability retirement, this could
spell a financial disaster for any fund which did not have assets
on an actuarial sound basis. Even on an actuarial sound basis ,
•.
'
I • •
0
'
-
•
•
0 -
-
-14
t he fund wou ld be severely s t rained to meet such a problem .
It is q ~l te po ssible for a fund to be financially sound and
yet actuari ally unsound with significant assets in the fund. Fo r
example, the Englewood Firefighters Pension Fund had assets at
the end of 1975 of $946,000 . Expenditures from the fund in 1975
total $68 ,000 while revenu es were in excess of $234 ,000, This
condition of accumulation of cash assets is expected to continue
over the next five to six years in the Firemens Pension Fund in
the City of Englewo od . Ho weve r , the pension fund is actuarially
unsound with unfund ed liabilities in excess of $1 .6 million . In
easy words , the pension fund should have assets of $1 .6 million
plus the $946 ,000 in o rder to be actuarial sound. This amount of
money would b e sufficient to pay benefit s to any current and future
retirees, in case of financial straights or dissolvement of the
Ci ty of Englewood. These large scale unfunded liabilities could
serve as a deterrent to the con sol idation of metropolitan govern -
ments especially in ligh of the unfunded liabilities of the City
and County of Denver which are in excess o f ~6.9 million . If
any consolidations were made of police and fire services u nd er
metro pol i tan government, he burdens of hese unfunded liabilities
mi ght be transferred to future years and to tax payers outside the
current governmental jurisdiction . Cities which have e x ercised
fi scal responsibility in the past in dealing wi h pensions would
be burdened with the costs of previously accrued pension benefits
under a different city . Bond houses acros!; the nation are tak ing
a closer look at the unfunded liabilities of city governments in
the pension fie l d since these liabilities will materially effect
the future ability of cities to pay off any bond issues in future
ye ars .
'
•.
'
• •
0
·.
'32xl ·. ,
-
•
•
•
,. -
!
-15 -
While the financial condition of the pension fund relates to
its ability t o pay pen sion benefit s in the near future , t he actuarial
s oundnes s of a pension f und consider s the pension funds long term
ability to pay pension b e ne fits . The financ i al cond i t i on of the
p ension funds i n Color ado was analyzed after attaining cop i es of
the annual reports of the f iremens ' and policemens ' pension funds
which are required to be f i led in the T reasure~'s Office of the
State of Col o rad o . The mo st rece n t reports were those filed in
1976 utilizing financ ial informat i on for receipts and expenditures
in 1975 . It was d e t e rmined fr om these r eports that the re are 192
fire pensions in the s t ate of Colo r ado consisting of 95 fire d istrict
funds and 97 muni cipa l fire funds . In addition there are 1 47 pol i ce
pension funds in t he s tat e for a otal of 339 total funds .
The informatio n nec e ssary for an evaluation of pension fund s was
taken from the se repo r ts and put on to a large spread s h eet . Once
J
the information was in thi s more concise form we were t hen a bl e t o
manipulate it and massage i t i nto mo r e u sable form . Ta bl e I indicates
that the total ass ets of the police and fire pension f u nd s a t the
end of 1975 wer e i n excess of $64 million. This is an i n c rease i n
one year of $7 .7 millio n. Total e x penditures f or one year we r e
$11.2 mi llion while total r eceipts were $18 .9 mill ion . Of the t otal
r eceipts o n ly $3 .2 mi l lion came from State sources wh i le $1 1.5
mi llion came from local cont ributions. The remainder came in the
f orm of interest i n come earned from the assets of the fund . The
employee con tributions wa s the smaller portion of the local contri-
bu tio n c onsi s ting o f $3 .5 mi llion while the employer cont r ibution
was $8 .5 mi l lio n. These pen s i on funds covered 3 ,797 p ol ice offi cers,
'
•
I • •
0
•
• j "-
TAlliE I
AIW.YSIS OP POLICI AIID PUE PEIISIOM FUIIDS Hll 1975
J'1ro ltunicipal Fi"te Police
Dietrict Flmdo lire Fundo !ill!. !ill!.
bployee Contribution• $ 165,979 $ 1,223,283 $ 1,389,262 $ 2,129,663 I~ Employer Contrlhutionl 688,979 3,213,724 3,962,703 4,566,544 ..
Tot•l hceipta-Local 854,958 4,497,007
j
5,351, 965 6,696,207
State Contribution 478,943 1,376,537 1,855,480 1, 301 ,154
Intereat JacOM: 36 9 1 4F 1,850, 715 2,220,147 1 ,456,719 I
fr I ....
Y' • • Total locelpto 1, 703,333 1, 724,259 9,427,592 9,454,080
Expenditure• 542,322 5,036 ,148 5,578,470 5,572,424
Not Gaia 1975 1 ,161,011 2,688,111 3,849,122 3,881,656
/ I If ~
........ 1/1/75 6,899,165 28,105,088 35 ,004 ,253 21 ,852,493
Aoooto 12/31/75 $ 8,060,176 $)0,793,199 $38,853,375 $25,734,149
.I I A•••••ed Value of
CovoroMnto 12/Jli7S $2,450,934,594 $4,280,294,041 $6,731,228,642 $5,1.58,851,580 . ·~
"'
·.
• ,
•
0 •
•
•
•
•
0
•
-17-
2,300 paid firefighters (estimate, and 3 ,510 volunteer firefighters
at the begin .l ing of 1976. The size discrepancy between the fire
pension funds ($38.9 mill i on) and the police pension funds ($25 .7
million) is accountable almost totally to the fact that the City
and County of Denver has a $14 million asset fund for the fire -
fighters while the police pension fund is ess e ntial ly on a pay -as -
you-go basis with assets of only $400,000. Since the differential
statewide between fire pension funds and police funds is slightly
over $13 million, these figures would tend to indicate that the
overall assets are approximately the same outside the City and
County of Denver.
In order to evaluate the financial condition of the pension
funds, an analy s i s of the expenditures as compared to receipts and
expenditures as compared to total assets was made . For most pensio n
funds in the state of Colorado, the indication that expenditures
exceeded 75% of receipts or that expenditure s exceeded 25% of the
assets would mean that financial difficulties were probably pending
in the near future in those funds. This is due to the fac t that
most of these pension funds have current emp loyees accruing benefits
with increasing liabilities in the near future as these employees
near retirement age. Table II depicts those departments in the state
which have expenditures exceeding 7 5% of rece ipts or 25% of assets.
As can be seen, a number of the smaller town pension funds are in
rather critical financial condition . Funds such as the Saguache
police and fire department, Victor fire department, Morrison police
department, Meeker police department, Granada , Grand Junction ,
Trinidad, Fort Morgan police departments and Debeque , Julesburg ,
LaJunta , Trinidad and Leadville fire departments as well as a number
of the fire districts are in critical financial condition at this
. -• •
•.
/-\,
'
I • •
0
. , f
•
I
·-
0
l, • • J
MuntclpalitY
Saauacha
Horriaon
Kaek.ar
Granada
Crand Junction
Trinidad
Fort Horaan
Oak Crult
Denver
Walatnbura
Edgewater
lloclty Ford
!Dah:vood
Olathe
Koo t e Viata
• •
•
..
I
J
~· -·-·---· --~--· -----.... ...-.... -..... --... ·------·--
POLICI
TABlE II
COLOIAIIO POLICE Alii) Pll! PEIISIOII PUIIDS
bpeftditurM l.&c8..tin& 751 of laceipto or 251 of Auota
nu DI!.PAII'IM!IITS
Erpaadituraa/ Jta:paadituaa/ Erpeodituraa/ !zpaodituroa/
keceipte ~ lblicipalitY Re cei pt 1 __!.!!..!!!.
874.7% 99 .01 Victor 4565.8% 308.4%
648.9% 58.6% saauach~ 1039.8% 442.0%
187.4% 59 .7% Dekqua 287.6% 88.3%
155 .7% 19.51 Juloabur& 144.81 42 .31
139.0% 29 .1% La Junta 136. 3% 28.2%
12).2% 63 .6% Trinidad 114.7% 54 .9%
119 .5% 26.5% LudvUla 100.5% 76.6%
107.2% 9 .1% lUco 99.4% 16.1%
101 .9% 934 .0% Pueblo 97.9% 31.8%
98.6% 9.8% ldaho Spr inp 97.8% 18.3%
90.1% 22.5% Ft. Kcraan 97 .6% 30.8%
86.5% 13.3% Oolt Creak 97.5% 629 .0%
82.0% 14 .7% Duran&o 96 .0% 12.6%
80 .6% 7.8% Hu go 94.5% 42.7%
76.5% 15.1% Walaanbura 90.7% 9 . 5%
Mancoa 87.7% 25 .8%
Grand JUDctiotl 87.4% 22 .7%
Salida 85.9% 26 .3%
Dao••r 85 .4% 22 .2%
11&1ta 82.8% 8 .3%
!atee Perk 81 .8% 28.7%
Sprl.nafiald 81.4% 10.9l
!dswatar 81.2% 52.8%
lruab 78.9% 27.0%
Manitou Sprinp 75.7% 29.2%
Z.ana 69 .5% 29.6%
...
I
.,
FlU DISniCTS
Zspe.ndit uraa/ Expend iturea/
~ Re c eipt a Aaaeta
N.W. Conejoa 206.21 2J.8Z
Green Ktn . lalla 191.)% )1.91
P1attnill~ 17).1% )1 .9%
Indian liillo 134.4% 2JJ.U
Haxtun Coaaolidatod 132.2% 37 .ot
Bennett 116 .9% J3.4t
r
l
Fl~ain& 116.7% 24 .Jt
lurl.inaton 114.8% 42.st I ....
Ft. &raaa llJ. )% 4 ).4% 'i"
Au.lt 100.7% 45.21
&en t Co .-Lu Aaiau 92 .9% 14.7%
1Ullroae 92.21 17.1%
Del Norte 87.4% 14.8% I • r
Florence 81.1% 2).0%
Straobura 18 78.1% 46.4%
Berthoud 69 .1% )).9%
I dledale 68 .8% 26.2%
lyon 50 .2% 37.31 ';
1
J "
,
•
•
•
•
0 t•
•
-3
·-.........
-19-
time. When a pens ion funds expenditures exceed annual re c eipts
and at the same time expenditures exceed assets , the fund is making
benefit payments on an annual basis or has been mov ing steadily
toward s the direction depleting the assets . This has been the case,
fo r instance in Victor, whi ch in 1975 finally reached the point of
having depleted all of its assets without ever increasi~g contributions
in recognition of the t ime when assets woul d be su bstantially go ne.
For the most part, asset accumulation should be increasing in the
police and fire fu nds due t o i ncreasing liabilities for future
retiree s . This table reflects the fact that 15 police pension funds ,
26 municipal fire de partments and 18 fire district department s are
fa cing possible financial problems in the very near future . Many
of these d e partments are sm aller commu nities wh ich have limited
capabilities to meet t he pending f inancial problems as they arise
without longer term plann ing .
Table III is a similar type of comparison only ut ilizing only
t he largest police and fire departments in the state of Colorado .
By looking at t hes e 20 police departments , you are reviewing 83%
of all police officers covered by pensions in the state and approxi -
mately an equal sampling of fire funds. While the lar gest dollar
potential i s found in these funds , it should still b e noted that
the smaller c ommunities can incur just as large a financia l problem
pr oportionately without corrective action. The local contribution
per officer in the se large departments runs from $739 in Westminster
to $3,306 in Pueblo . Th e city of Pueblo has a home rule charter
am endment which requ ires that the police and fire pe nsion funds be
actuarially sound. This would account for its large contri buti on s
per officer. As can be se en , the state co ntribut i on as a percentage
of receipts is not s ignificant and arranges from 7 .2% in Pueblo to
'
\
I • •
0
·' \ !
I
'!
• •
.,
•
TABLE III
SELECTtO POLICE PESSION FUNDS FOR 1975 SELECTED nRDIL' PlXSlON FUNDS fOR 197)
Local State l..oca l Stnle
St.Jte Con trib. Contrib. Hwticipality No. o ( St OJ.t e Conttib. C\Jn trib.
No . -.)£ rontrib. Expend. ~ per per o r Paid No. o f CC\ntrib . F.xpcnJ. E:w~nJ. per pe r
~t J'\1(· tp .. ; t t_'€" ~ ~ Receipts ~ Q!!.ill.!. ~ Di stri ct ~Vol. Rcct>1PLJ; ~r:c.e l p tL ~ Q!.!.i_C_!:..!. .9.!.ll:!!.
Atvada 84 9.5 2.8 .8 $2,542 $353 Arvada FPO 6 145 29.1 11.8 2. 7 s 566 $362
Auro ra U9 11.4 25 .3 6.1 l, 72 8 353 Aurora 133 0 19 .8 40.7 8.5 1,602 644
Bou lder 103 12.1 34.8 9.0 1, 986 353 Boulder 63 0 24.9 29.9 9.1 l , 9K4 906 il Srooaf ie.ld 28 18.7 14.4 4 . 5 1,137 353 W. Ada tDS Co. FPD 30 70 21.5 24 .3 5.4 858 411 ..
Colo. Sprtna• 282 9 .9 41.0 8 .8 2 ,096 353 Colo . Springs 233 0 16 .5 )).9 e.8 2 ' 56t. 7C6
C..:u::c.crce C1t)' 41 15.2 7.0 2. 2 1,317 353 S. Adalli.S Co. FPD 4 47 21.9 69.3 l J .1 370 :J7
Deaver 1,435 13.4 101.9 934 .o 2. 264 35 3 Denve r 9l8 0 15.8 85 .4 22.2 ~. 497 65 1
~&lo"ood 66 19.5 82.0 14 .7 1,469 353 Englewood 68 20 13 .' 28.9 7 .l 1 , 735 J60
Ft. CoJJ tn• 69 1 6.6 12. 7 ).1 933 353 Ft. Co l lins 66 0 21.9 20.9 4.2 1,080 519
r:r and Jur,,~tl~n 55 21.7 139.0 29.1 1 ,157 353 Grand Junct Lo n 48 0 18 .8 87.4 21 .7 1 '733 406 I .,.
Gret: le y b4 l7 .5 48.3 10.4 1,077 353 Greeley 55 0 21.5 51.8 14 .7 1 ,400 532 'i'
t.ul<<'JOOd "I 12 .3 9 .8 4. 2 2.041 353 Lakewood FPD 80 0 49.8 64 .6 8.2 1, 427 767
LlttlttOft " 14.0 5.4 1.0 1,371 35) 1.1 ttleton 70 0 26.0 26.5 5.9 l , 7:S 945 ~r lon ,.o41t 4) 16. ~ 37.6 9.9 1,061 )53 Longmon t )8 0 22.5 35 .9 9.1 1. )62 615 I w nlud )4 l6.l 11.8 2. 2 l , LOl 353 Loveland J) 4 2 27.1 42.8 10 .5 690 423 0 •
:l ntbal•M ,. 20.4 11.5 ).1 1,212 35) '-'. Acta11.s Co. FPO 30 7tl 21 .5 24.3 5.4 e58 411
•• I Pu.r.,lo U4 7. 2 37.7 7. 3 3, 306 353 Pueblo 153 0 12. H 97.9 31.8 1, 755 348
!"'ornto:n )b 14.6 5 . 7 1.8 1 ,515 353 Thornton )7 6 18.3 13.9 6.0 1 ,412 376
\:', •t:lit~ttet ·~ 21.2 9 . 6 2.1 739 353 Westm inster 6 40 :8.3 26.9 5. 7 856 4~6
··n .. ot '-1d&• ~l 17.5 12.2 3. 9 l, 311 353 Wheat Ri d&e FPD 0 65 28.5 58 .1 12.8 5 )9 364
::e rr : ~. ~"'.Jc~'O stat.i1t1ca covt:r 83% of all police of(lcers CC'\•ered NOTE: Fire r rotec t ion DiHric ts (FPD) do not hove .::o~e:mir.~us boundades
n 7
by pt:nJ10nl ln the •tate. with mun icip.11il i!!s. For ex.1mplt>, both Bro om[icld and No rt hghnn
a re served by '..'e s t Ad ams Co. FPD and ~tpp r n xima.tel y one-third o!
Lilkewo od is se rv ed by Bancroft f'PO. The contributions per officer
in volun t eer and p:l r t volunt eer departments are generally lover
than paid departments because pension ben ~C ite are leas Co r volunteers .
' I
I
-,.... ...
----------------------------------------------------·-
·-\--
• ,
•
0 •
•
•
•
0 I•
•
--.e6---~--J-
-21-
21.7% in Grand Junction. The state contribution compared to total
receipts aver ages 13 .8% in the police pension funds and 19.7% in
the fire pension funds . Th is inequity between the funds also seems
to be unjustifiable. The low city and high city reflect the fact
that Pueblo is financing the fund on a totally actuar ially sound
basis where Grand Junction is one of those cities which is indicated
on Table II as being in serious financial condition. The amount
of local contribution alters the percentage of state contributions.
This low proportion of state contributio n to receipts is interesting
in light of the fact that the state mandates the level of benefits
which must be accorded by the local pension funds and yet contributes
a rather minor portion o f the overall finances to pay for these
benefits. It is interesting to note that the City a nd County of
Denver accounts for almost ha lf of the paid police and firefighters
in the state of Colorado .
Another inte resting fact is that the state contribution per
officer in the fire pension fund deviates in the larger pension
funds from $207 in the South Adams County Fire Protection District
to $945 in the Littleton Fire Department. This more than quadrupling
of state aid per officer is due t o the fac t that the state attempts
to contribute to the fire pension funds on a matching one-half mill
levy equivalency basis. The state determines from the reports filed
annually in the State Treasurer's Office what the level of municipal
contribution is on a one-half mill levy comparison . The state then
attempts to contribute equal to one -half of a mill if the local
comm unity also cont r i butes at least a half mill . Howeve r, in recent
ye ars , the appropriation has not been sufficient to match one-half
of a mill which i n 19 75 r esulted in a factor of 66 .615% being
applied against a local entity's one -half mill equ ivalency. In
'
• ·. , ·' ' r
"
I
•.
• •
0
-
•
•
•
•
0
•
-22-
easy words, if a local community contributed the one-half mill, the
state contrih uted 66.615% of that number. The mill levy base for
state contribution has no relationship to the total number of fire -
fighte rs in a community or salary levels paid and as a result is
meaningless in a statewidepension situation. Th e police pension
funds on the other hand are distributed on a per office~ basis which
in 1975 was equivalent to $353.00 per officer. Since pension benefits
are based upon a percentage on a final average income even this
method of contribution by the state does not take into account the
higher salary levels paid in the metropolitan area as compared to
the smaller communities. This results in the state aiding the
smaller communities in a greater portion than the larger communities
where higher salaries are found.
Table IV indicates the distribution of statistical percentages
for the 339 different pension funds. The three important statistical
percentages are the percentage of state contribution to total
receipts , the percentage of total expenditures to total receipts ,
and the percentage of total expendtures to total assets . For
instance, in ·he percentage of state contributions to total receipts
five police pension funds relied totally upon the state contribution
to financ e their local pension fund. On the percentage of total
expenditures to total receipts, 17 o f the fire pension funds or 8.9%
exceeded 100% while 9 of the police pension funds or 6.1% exceeded
100% of pay out. The average in the state for expenditures compared
to receipts in the fire pension funds was 59.2 % while the average
in the police pension funds was 58.9%. This distribution of statisti-
cal percentages gives an overall view t o s o me of more specific numbers
which have been looked at in Tables II and III.
•.
I • •
0
. 1 '32 xl
•
0 I•
•
-23-
TABlE IV
DISTRIBUTION OF STATISTICAL PERCENTAGES
Percentage Percent-Fire Fire Mun1c1-Fire of State ~--· .. Districts palities Total Police
Contribution to / Total 100 0 0 5-3.Q% Receipts 90 0 0 3-2.0% 80 0 0 2-l.Q % 70 0 1-l. 0% 1-.5% 2-l.Q% 60 0 2-2.1% 2-1.0% 10-6.8% 50 0 3-3.1% 3-1.6% 6-Q.1% QO Q-Q.2% 7-7.2% 11-s. 7% 16-10.9% 30 30-31.6% 17-17.5% Q7-2Q.5% 23-15.6% 20 39-Ql.1% 35-36 .1% 7Q -38 .5% Q2-28 .6% 10 12-12.6% 28-28.9% Q0-20.8% 32-21 .8% 0 10-10.5% Q-Q.1% 1Q-7.Q% 6-Q.O% Av erage 28.1% 17.8% 19.7% 13.8%
Percentage of Greater
Total than 100 10-10.5% 7-7.2% 17-8.9% 9-6.1% Expenditures to
Total 90 2-2.1% 8-8.2% 10-. 5.2% 2-'l.Q% 12\0"~If>f) 80 2-2 .1% 8-8.2% 10-5.2% 3-2.0% 70 3-3 .2% 5-5.2% 8-Q.2% 1-.7% 60 6-6.3% 7-7.2% 13-6.8% 5-3.Q% 50 7-7.4% 5-5.2% 12-6.3% .. 1-'.7% QO 4-4.2% 10-10.3% 1Q~ 7.3% . .5-3.Q% 30 10-10.5% 10-10.3% 20-10.Q% 11-7-5% 20 11-11.6% 18-18.6% 29-15.1% 7-4.8% 10 10-10.5% 7-7.2% 17~ 8.9% 20-13.6% 0 30-31.6% 12-12 .Q% Q2-21. 7% 83-56.Q% Average 31.8% 65.1% 59.2% 58.9%
Percentage of
Total 100 1-1.1% 3-3.1% 4-2.1% 1-.7% Expenditures to
Total Assets 90 0-0 0-0 0-~0 1-.7% 80 0-0 1-1. 0% 1-.5% 0-0 70 0-0 1-1.0% 1--5% 0-0 60 0-0 0-0 0-0 1-.7% • 50 0-0 2-2.1% 2-1.0% 2-l.Q% QO 4-Q.2% 2-2.1% 6-3.1% 0-0 30 6-6.3% 2-2.1% 8-Q.2% 0-0 20 5-5.3% 10-10.3% 15-7.8% 4-2.7% 10 17-17.9% 16-16.5% 33-17.2%. 10-6.8% 0 62-65.2% 60-61.8% 122-63.6% 128-87.0% I Average 6.7% 16.3% 1Q.4% 21.7% • •
0
'
. I
·' \ !
1 • '!
-
•
•
•
•
-w
-24-
Table V takes a look at the local cont ributi on (employer and
employee con ri bution) of the police funds in excess of $1,000.
As c an be seen, 36 communities in the state contribute over $1,000
to the pension fund. The statewide average is $1,817 . The highest
in the state is the city of Sal i da which contributed $3,961 per
officer in 1975. This is due to the fact that the Saliqa pension
fund has been bankrupt in the recent past and ceased payments
benefits for a period of approximately two years. The fund is now
in a position of having to catch up, not only to pay its current
retirees but to begin to accumulate some assets f o r future retire -
ments . The situation may easily happen to ot her small communities.
Pueblo ranks #2 as a result o f its home rule charter requirement
for actuarial soundness. It i s inter est ing to note that Denver
which is on a pay-as-you-go basis currently contributes $2 ,264
per officer ranking #5 in the state. This com bined local contribu-
tion per officer can be expecte d to rise dramatically in futu re
years as the number of retirees increases in relation to paid
officers. In the past the City and County of Denver has relied up on
the growth of its police department and their current contributions
to pay for retirement s. As indicated on Ta ble V of the 147 police
pension funds , 71 of them currently constituting almost half of the
total pension funds in the stat e make no contribution to the police
pensi on fund . For the most part , these are smaller communities but
indeed this be comes quite interesting in light of the fact t hat some
of the most severe financial problems exist in the small communities .
For instance, the town of Bow Mar now has a pol ice officer with 19
years of service eligible to retire wit hin one year and yet have
no contributions to the pol i ce pension funds over the past 1 9 years .
As a result, the pension liability which now ex i sts is of large size
.. , ·' \ (
'!'
'
•.
• •
0
•
/
I .
~
)
'
•
~unic1polity
l. Salida
2. Pueblo
3. Cranby
4 . Arvada
5. Deave r
6 . Colorado Springs
7 . Lai.evood
8. Boulder
9. Cltndale
10. Jtroooolina
11. Aurora
12 . La JW'It&
1]. Thornton
14. En&lovood
lS. Littleton
I 16. Co-.rc:.a City
17. Wheat l.ida•
18. Up•n
19. Buao
20. llorthglODII
21. Vail
22. Crunvood VU1aao
23 . Crancl J\81ctioa
'j 24. lrooaUald
25 . Wray
26. Duranao
27. Lovel&Dcl
28 . Gold&a
•
COIIbiDed Local
Contributicn Per Officer
$3,961
3,306
3,221
2,542
2,264
2,096
2,0U
1,986
1,983
1,839
1,728
1,529
1,515
1,469
1,311
1,311
1,311
1,284
1,232
1,212
1,209
1,177
l,lS7
1,137
1,136
1,109
1,101
1,099
"
TABLE V
LOCAL CONnDUTI ORS IO POLICE FUNDS FOR 19 7 5
iD Eacoaa of $1,000
eo.biaod Local
Municipali ty Contribution Per Officer
29. Delta $1,088
30. Grand Lake 1,085
31 . Gre eley 1 ,077
32. Lon amcmt 1 ,061
33 . Manitou Springe 1,052
34 . Edgewater 1,046
35 . Lamar 1,026
]6. Federal Height• ....will.
State Average $1,817
0 M ---~-It,,, :-1 ~~~~:-~,-.~:_:~,,~~~=-2~:~-=----~~7~::l,~~:f~~v~~-~--~-~~:'-~~~;~5--
• • \.,
0 •
I
lela tive Spread of Loc.al Coatribut101ll
No . o f % of
Municipalities MunJ c i pall. t h:s
I
$30DO-3 2.0%
200D-3000 4 2 . 7%
1500-2000 6 4 .1%
1000-lSOO 23 15 .6%
900-1000 5 3.4% l .,
800-900 5 3.4%
70 D-800 5 3 .4%
60D-700 s 3.4 %
500-600 2 1.4%
400-500 0 0 % I
"' JOD-400 9 6 .1 : Y'
200-300 3 2.0% I 0 • r
100-200 5 ).4%
0-100 1 • 7%
0 I.!. ~
To t al 147 100.00%
7
l
'-" 1
~~~ -&A Zi!±d¥_-4 ~-----~ *~~ ·= ~ ..,_ :c..,~ ,
-~I
,
.
•
•
•
•
0
•
-26-
and can have serious impli c ations on the long term financial condition
of the smal l t own . Table VI indicat es those fire pens i on funds
which were below the one -half mil l equivalency in the employer
contribution in 1975. As stated earlier , a fund has to contribute
at least a half-mill from the employer contribution to be eligible
for the maximum state contribution. As can be seen from this chart,
40 funds d id not contribute enough to be eligible for maximum state
contribution. It i s int eresting to n ote that some of the communities
which have seve re pension problems a s indicated on Chart II such
as Brus h, Delta, Fort Mor gan, Idaho Springs, Salida, Sp ringfield,
and Walsenburg do not cont ribu te an amount equal to one -half mill
equ ivalency.
One last area which we looked at was the inve stment of the
assets of the funds. Of the assets at the end of 19 7 5 ($64 .6 million)
only 1.4% was held in cash assets as oppos ed to investments . 98 .6%
of the assets were invested i n savings accounts, certificates of
depo sit , b o n ds , stocks, or insurance annuities . The inv estment
philo s ophy for the most part was very conservative with 2 7.7 % of
the fire funds and 48.1% of the police funds in savings accounts
or certificates of deposts. An additional 60.9% of the fire funds
and 45.5% o f the pol ic e funds were in bonds. Only 8 .8% of the fire
funds and 3 .2% of the polic e funds were in stocks . The sto ck invest-
ments were restricted to Denver, Aur o ra, Lakewood , Colo rad o Springs
and Engle wood. For the most part , savings accounts were used by
the small commu ni ties . It is assumed that the rate of return in
he smaller communities is smaller as a result .
·, ,
'~
.• \ !
'r
I
•.
• •
• • I
•
TABU:: VI
FI.U FUNDS BELOW l/2 HILL EQUI VALENCY
Haxl-Act I>&! Potential Lo .. llaxi-Act I>&! PotentJ.al Lo.e Man1cipal1tx £l1&ibilttr ll1&1b1litr State Contribution Municipality !llgibili ty Eligibility State Co nt r ibution
1 . Al • ..., •• $ 7,SH $ 6,255 $ 864 29. Paaoaa Sprina• $ 1,083 $ 838 $ 163 1 . lrtahtoo 20,591 l6,S2S 2, 709 30. Pal-r Lalto 1,211 1,030 121 J . lruah 3,2S6 2,896 240 31. Paonia 1,021 500 347 ~ . luana Via ta 1,876 1,600 184 32. RHlo 2,lS6 2,039 78
5. Carbondale 6,519 4,698 1,213 33. Rocky Ford 11,837 b, 740 3, 395 \I ... ll !». c.utla lock 3, )90 2,204 790 34. Salida 4, 348 4,i85 !09 7. Cued• 446 193 169 35. Sp ring!ield 1,236 I, 204 21 S . Delta 3 ,S48 2,000 1,031 36 . Steamboat Springs 11,832 3,000 S,883
9 . Fairplay 724 500 149 37. Sterling 10,S22 4 ,14 4 4,249 ' 10. Ft . Horgan 8 .193 7. 375 545 38. W>lsenbur8 2, 332 1,318 669 11. fowler 920 869 34 39. Woodlaod Park 2,319 SOD 1,212 12. Fountain 5,580 4, 777 535 40. Yuma ---.hill ~ -.ill. I
!::,
1, 369 1,242 $ 349,411 I 13. Fr ulta 85 Total $291,759 s 38,"10 14 . Glendale 9,852 5, 70S 2, 763
ir I 1 S . Gle.nvood Sprin&• 6,920 2,000 3,277 0 • 16. Golden 17,576 15,071 1,669
17. Gunahoa 3,4S8 2,000 971
18. Holly 632 62S 7
19. Holyoke 1,609 1,506 69
20 . Idaho Sprtna• 1, 927 1,886 27
I i 21. ~re-.J!ng 1,193 756 291 Note : State appropriation was 66.615% of fund& needed II .. 22 . Littleton 122,540 120,969 1,047 to ""'tch loco! contributions at 1/2 m.111. Also,
2J. Loveland 38,236 J7. 971 177 so~~~e 76 C!re districts are below the 1/2 mill
24. Meolter 2,175 1,957 145 equivalency .
25. Monte Viota 12. 3J1 9,395 1,956
26. Montro•• 12,333 12,078 170 I~ 27. Nov Caotle 282 100 121
28. Olathe 2,609 1,402 804 .
I
' I
I .,.
•.
• ,
• .,
() •
-
•
•
•
•
1, i;-· J-
-28 -
It becomes o bvious fro m revi e win g the results of this financial
informati o~ t hat there are numerous pension funds both large and
small in the state of Colorado which have serious financial problems
either presently or in the very near future. This is a result of
both non-attention on the local l e vel and minimal f unding on the
state level despite the fact that the state requires a ·certain minimum
level of benefits.
The second aspect of the financial sub-committee study considered
the actuarial soundness of the police and fire pension plans . While
a previous task force stydy de termined in 1974 that only 13 act uarial
studies have been conducted of police and fire pension plans in the
state of Colorado, we were able to ascertain that 69 different plans
in the state of Colorado had actuarial studies. We felt that this
was due to the increase d awareness as a result of c oncentrati on in
the subject by the Colorado Municipa l League and national press.
In 1976 , our method of col le cting actuarial reports was to contact
the five actuarial firms that had done work in the state of Colorado
and to find out from them which cities had actuarial r eports conducted
in the past five years. Then by contacting the indiv i dual cities
we either obtained copies of the actuarial reports or permission
to get a copy from the actuarial f i rm itself . Th e actuarial informa tion
f r om all of these different re p or t s was t hen combined into t wo ta bl es
whi c h are shown as Table VI I and Ta b le VII I . These tables indicate
t he current level of contribution s by the state, employer and employee
f o r the total level of contribution; the requirements to fund b oth
·.' ·.
•.
I • •
0
.• \ !
I
'!'
-
\
15!;3;~ ~~;~:;~ ••"'••o• o.o .,.,,.._..,.
I
r'
Iii~~::::!! ~~~~~;~ ... ~,..~ .... ,.:i~~;i ~ ·~·2~=~ ~~ !iHii1;!~ ~a ....... -.,.. ~~,\! -a:~:;;=:~ H ~~~ ~!:!::~==:: ::~:!'!!.~!!· !;!
~?~~~~~ i ~:· ~~~~~~~ ~~9 M ~;·~~=:a
:1 ~
i?f i§§~~~:; i! .... -· ,...J ••fC! .... ... ""'::2!:•:::: ::,.J::!-!::"'
""O••i""• :a!M;:.;:::; !3~!::~ ii!~i;; -... ~;:~-·
~H~!~~ ~~~~~~~
~l~~~;~ ~i~~~~i ""'::::!~~~ .... :::: ;:;:~-=~ .. ;
~·~!~~~ § §§ §:J .;~~~:!1 ~-~
--.
,.. ::;::~~=-:::~t:~~:; 3 ·;;~~~ ~s~=-z::~
• ~~!!:~:;::;~ ,_...,..,..,_o,... ... .... ..,_ .... .., ....
·.
•
•
-2')-
•
-
...
I
,.
-.... o •o .... oo ~:t :.! ; c;;...,· .. , .. :
I "'!!: • ~ ..
Ei~~~~~ rs5 !!~
Uli
~;; ... ::;~j
~""';i •=:"'·~
!:;R!:!.;;:!
~~ ~~~~-~
~~
.~ ,__2 1 ' ~01 ;::
~~~ §
~ ·~
l:: !!i~§i;
=~l ~:e =:;::
~£~~~4~ ::::a •~:::t
~~i~~:1~
~:=·==:!
~H~~~~ ~=3 .... =:e~
~~~0~~~
:~~o ;~~
:; .. ; ""•::!
;§§o~U
o!;Eoo;§
.... _..., -o
;nun .., ..... _ .................
;gu;u
c .... .., .......... .... ""'--""'~""'.,..j
......... 0 ~iS ~=~ ~ ... ~
~;:~~i~~ r•• ..,...,,.._"
•
,_
•.
\
i
~ .•
i
E
i ' I
I
'E
}
5
< l. ;u
Hi. ~H
~~s: • ~a ~n
tJ!.!I
HI ~:r
I • •
-
a z ~ (( ... ~ H
H z > ~ ; ~~9 f-' ~i
•
•
•
:. -
i3 ::--
-30 -
~§~g§. ~~~~?. !e~~!. :5!!~ I :!f'~:::.., ~:: .... §~. ~·~ .!:::;::;:-.;~
2i .?. ~r~~ oo i~~ ~~. ~~ 1
.oo•c-o .... )t -~ co ........ --..... ~ ~ ~q:; ~..,;:~ ~~~ ~~~~~I
r;; o:: ~~== ~c:~ ~~-$i?: I : ::;~;J.. r · _ .. _ j
•
,_
j
. , ·' I !
'T
I • •
•
•
•
•
t u a
-31-
normal costs (curre ntly accruing benfits) and the past service
(benefits ac rrued in the past) with a total requirements to fund
ove r 40 years; and the contribution deficiency . As can be seen,
most communities currently have a contribution deficiency of fairly
large size . On the Police Pensi on Funds (Table VII), the city of
Grand Junction shows a severe actuarial condition with a _contri bution
def i ciency of 34 .360%. On the other hand, Pueblo has no co ntribution
deficiency since its home rule charter provision requires actuarial
soundness . The City of Englewood shows a contribution deficiency
of 12 .206% and an unfunded liability of $2.4 million . The range on
the table of actuarial requirements goes from Leadville at 6 .979%
to Denver at 76 .400% of payroll . The last two columns indicate
the actuarial value of benefits to individuals pre s e n tly r eceiv i ng
benefits and the fund assets at actuarial value. For instance , i n
the case of the city of Englewood while fund assets were $725 ,180 ,
the amount needed to fund just the existing retirees until their
deaths was $1 ,281 ,878 . The actuarial accrued unfunded liability
was $2 ,375 ,762 which includ ed that value needed to fund the current
employees accrued retirement benefits . The unfunded liability in
the City and Council of Denver for police officers was $161 million
all by i tself . While the financial condition as indicated by the
previous tables is acute in many Colorado towns, the actuarial find -
ings indicate a condition even more severe in the same communities .
Grand Junction 's current financial problem as indicated by the
other tables, is even worse whe n considering the future actuarial
needs in their funds. The same tables are repeated for the fire
pension funds on Table VIII. A review of the actuarial findings
bring us to the conclusion that the future condition of police and
fire pension funds in the state of Colorado are extremely hazardous .
J--\
I • •
0
•
•
•
I •
•
_£ ....
?
-32 -
When thi s sub -committee report was made to the study committee
at their t tird meeting , it materiall y changed the outlook on t he
study committee of what necessary actions were needed to b egin to
correct the problems existing in police and fire pensions in the
state. Rather than do ing cosmetic sur gery to the existing police
and fire pension plans, it was decided that it was un re_al istic
politically and financially to expect to be able to correct the
existing plans . Rather a new statewide pension plan was suggested
for all new hirees af er July 1, 197 7 . Over a pe r iod of years the
fundin g levels needed to pay the benefits to the e xisting employees
)-
as well as existing retirees would be funded from the existing funds
so that over a term of 40 years the problems in the police and fire
p en sion in the state of Colorado would be solved . Th is long term
approach while recogniz ing that it brought the pro blem of financial
conditions for t h e existing plans to a head within that 40 years
period was deemed as one that could b e b ought since no existing
lob b y forc e existed f or new hirees afte r July 1, 1977 . A statewide
pension plan would include provisions for bene fits a nd contributions.
Drafting Sub -Committee Repor t
The draft ing sub-committee met on four occasions spending
entire mornings work ing ou t the pro visions of the new statewide
po lice and fire pension f und for all ne w hires after July 1 , 1977.
It was de c ided that the old statutes would be amended only in trying
to get additional financial appropriations and that the new statute
for a central fund wo uld try to work o ut some benefit and contri -
but ion lev e ls which were fa ir to b ot h the employee and employers
in the state of Colorado . The enclo sed sheet attemp ts to rela te the
decisions which were made by the drafting sub -committee in i ts consider-
ation o f the central fund. One major criteria that the drafting sub -
'
I • •
0
-
•
•
• •
-a
-33-
committee had was to allow for portability in pension from one
( municipa J:ty to another. Currently, when an employee leaves one
•
city to go to work for another, the city who has hired the individual
assumes the full retirement b nefits and liability for the employee.
For instance, if an employee worked for the city of Englewood for
19 years and then went to the city of Sheridan for one.year and
achieved his 20 year service requirement and was age 50 years old,
the city of Sheridan would be reponsible for the full retirement
benefits to be paid to that individual. This has severely restricted
the hiring of individuals b etween cities and has prevented promotional
considerations outside the department for most cities . This porta-
bility feature was worked out in the central fund to give credit
to each city for previous cities costs as they relate to the pen sion .
The different elements of the pension plan are indicated in Exhibit
14 and will not be gone into with any great detail at this time.
The central fund would require actuarial soundness for every
element of the fund . The actuarial studies would be done on a city
or fire district basis and the contributions could differ between
entities based upon their particular age, length of service require -
ments , and a dditional benefits. Any addit ional benefits which
individual entities would want to give over and above those mandated
by state law would require additional contributions by the local
entities . Local pension boards would continue to make decisions
on such items as disability while the statewide fund would take
over investment procedures as well as determining actuarial re-
quirements. Contribution and rates to the new fund would be shared
equally between the state, city and employee with a maximum of
10% for the employee in order to insure their support for the new
program . Cities which so desir ed could decide to transfer their
\-
·' \ !
'r
..
I
•.
• •
0
-
•
•
(•
•
--------------~~-1--\
c
({
•
-34 -
existing employees into the new fund if they were willing to be gin
contrir u tio n at an actuarially sound rate.
Future Action
The Colorado Mun i cipal Le ague staff is currently reviewing
the study committees recommendation and drafting it into legislation
for the 1977 General Ass embly . The Policy Comm ittee_ is me e tin g o n
De ce mber 16 and will consider th ese r ecomm endation s. They are
expected to approve them and send them o n to the Ex ecutive Board
for their consideration . On December 17 the Executive Board is
also expected to approve the se recommendati on s and the intense
lobbying effort on the local level wi ll begin. Each municipality
will be encouraged to become thoroughl y familiar with the recommended
legislation and to meet wi th its appropr iate l eg islative representa-
tives in order to push fo r this new legisl at i on . An impor t ant
aspect to be consid ered is that municipalities are n ot going to
the state to solve their problem but indeed are looking to the
state to help them in a mutual res o lution o f the problem. The
financial data indicates the need to take a hard look at the police
and fire pensions in the stat e of Colorado . While Colorado is
basically a conservative fiscal state, we have allo wed financ ial
probl em s to deve lop in the police and fire pension fund s which are
probably the great est financi al bu rdens to municipalities in the
state at this time. It is our hope that the General Assembly
after reviewing the facts and information will al so endorse this
solution to the c ritical pro blem . It is my feel ing that t he numerous
hours of time spent by the financial sub-committee, drafting sub-
committee and study c ommit tee will not go for naught but will
indeed serve as a basis for new legislat i on in this area in 1977
or soon thereafter.
• . ,
'
I • •
'
•
•
•
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
•
• •
Mayor and Members of City Council
Andy McCown, City Manager
December 14, 1976
Boards and Commission Agencies
t•
The following list of positions will become vacant on the Boards
and Commissions in the C1ty early in 1977. You may want to begin
cons ideration of people for replacement or reappointment in order
t o ma ke the final decisions in January.
Current
Member
Term
Expiration
Commiss ion
Board of Adjustment and
Appeals
Board of Career Service
Commissioners
Planning and Zoning
Commission
Public Library Board
Water and Sewer Board
Retirement Board
Housing Authority
Urban Renewal Authority
~!f!Ju~
ity Manager
AM/sb
Kenneth W. Wetterstrom
Robert Brundage
Eddie Tanguma, Jr.
Lee R. Jones
F. Earl DeuPree(vacant)
Mrs. Beverly Simon
Mrs. Lois Sterling
Glen E. Wallace
William Ritterhouse
(vacant)
Mrs. Betty Beier
Mrs. Betty Beier
'
2-1-77
3-15-77
2-1 -77
2-1-77
2-1-80
2-1-77
2-1-77
2-1-77
2-1-80
7-1-77
2-5-77
. ,
I . •
c
f 32xl
-
(
•
•
•
•
·. •
)-, __
An dy Mc Cown, City Manager
~ Kells Waggoner
INni-OfiiiiCI
,.,IOIIAIDIM
DA11& December 20, 1976
IU&IICT1 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT -TRAFFIC SIGNALS, ETC.
Attached hereto are copies (received Friday, December 17, 1976) of a
~mental agreement from the State Department of Highways covering
' on si nals and striping alan sta hi hw within
tpe city limits of Englew00d. We alrea y have a basic agreement which
was approved on July 1, 1974. This supplemental agreement is necessi-
tated by the fact that the attorney for the Department of Highways has
ruled that, in order to add a signal to the Exhibit, we need a supple-
mental agrement to provide for payment.
Our payment from the State has been held up since July of this year,
and in order for us to show the funds as revenue for this year, we need
to have the supplemental agreement approved and executed by the Mayor.
Therefore, if at all possible, would you please submit this to Council
on December 20, 1976 under Manager's Choice.
I have discussed the supplemental agreement with the City Attorney, and
he indicates that, since we already have a basic agreement, the supple-
mental agreement needs only to be approved by motion from Council .
. --/ 1(_. /,_ I ..:.1.. ...,~--·)~· -···
Kells Waggoner
Director of Public Works
KW /ls
At tachs .
'
. ,
• •
0
I[
(
(
•
•
•
•
•
> .e
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS -STATE OF COLORADO
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF
TRAFFIC CONTR OL DEVICES
/-\
This Supplemental Agreement, e ntered into this day of
----------------' 1976, by and between the STATE DEPARTMENT OF
HIGHWAYS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS -STATE OF COLORADO, hereinafter
referred to as the "Division" and the CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
hereinafter referred to as the "C i t y."
WITNESSETH: That
WHEREAS, the Division and the City entered into an Agreement
dated the 1st day of July, 1974 , hereinafter referred to as
the "Basic Agreement," attached hereto and ma d e a part hereof,
which provides for installation, operation and maintenance of
all traffic control devices on the State Highway System within
the City; and
WHEREAS, the Basic Agreement, unless specifically revised o r
amended herein, shall be and remain in full force and effect with
respe ct to the contractual relationship between the parties here-
to; end
WHEREAS, the parties her eto now desire to revise the Basic
Agreement with respect to the number of control devices to be
operated and maintained and the unit cost to maintain each control
device.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above, and the mutual
covenants set forth hereinafter the Division and the City
do hereby covenant and agree as follows:
' ·. .. ,
• •
0
·' \ !
' '! '32xl
-
(
(
(
•
•
• t•
·. •
... > e
1. The ·Special Provisions which are attached hereto
and made a part of this Supplemental Agreement,
are incorporated by reference into the Basic
Agreement.
2. Exhibits "B" and "C" which are attached hereto
and incorporated herein are substituted .for
Exhibits "B~ and "C" in the Basic Agreement.
Exhibits "B" and "C" in the Basic Agreement are
declared null and void.
'
•.
}--
• •
0
· . . ,
-
(
•
•
• ,_
• t•
·. •
=
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties h ere to have cau•e d the fo re-
going supp lemen t a l agreeme nt to b e execu t e d the day and y e ar first
a b o v e wri tten.
ATTEST:
Ch1ef Cl erk
APPROVED:
DAN S. vlHITTEMORE
State Controll er
By
ATTEST:
Ci ty Clerk
STATE OF COLORADO
RICHARD D. LAMM
GOVERNO R
STATE DEPAR'l'MENT OF HIGHWAYS
JACK KINSTLINGER
EXECUTIV E DI RECTOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
By
E. N. HAASE
Chief Engineer
APPROVED:
J . D. MACFARLANE
Attorney General
By
CLTY OF ENGLEWOOD
By ~-=~----------------------MAYOR
'
•.
I • •
0
• I
. -,...... ,....... ..........
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
July 1, 1975 EXHIB~T "B" (SIGNALS) -1-
S.B. Nt!.-lllER U.S. NO. LOCATION COST/MO. COST/YR.
75 (So . Broadway) -Cct~nnia1 Ave. sa4.00 $100a .oo
75 " " -Bell~view Ave. a4.00 1008.00
75 " " -Chenango Av~. 84.00 10oa.oo
75 " " -Tufts Av~. a4.00 1008.00
75 .. " -Quincy Ave. 84.00 1008.00
75 " " -OXford Ave. 84.00 1008.00
75 .. " -Mans fi~ ld Ave. a4.00 1008.00 ll 75 " " -Kenyon Ave. a4.00 1008.00
75 " " -Hampden Ave. (U.S. 2a5) 84.00 1008 .00
a5 (S. Santa Fe Or.) 85 Dartmouth Ave. 84.00 1008.00
Sa (E. Belleview Ave.) -Clarkson St. 84.00 1008.00
sa " " .. -Logan St. a4.00 1008.00 1 I • • 88 (Federal Blvd.) -W. Union Ave. 84.00 1008.00
88 " " -Stanford Or. & Tufts Ave. Mid-block a4.00 1008.00
8a " .. -!olonmou th Dr. & Bellwood Dr.· . 84.00 1008.00 I I Mid-block I 7 285 (W. Hampden Ave.) 285 Inca St. 84.00 1008.00
285 " " " 285 Huron St. 84.00 1008.00
285 .. " " 2a5 Galapago St. a4.00 1008.00
235 " " " 2a5 Fox St. , a4.00 lOOa .oo
2a5 " " .. 2a5 E1ati St.-: a4.00 1008.00
285 " " " 2a5 Cherokee St. a4.00 100a .oo
1
:!85 " " " 285 Bannock St. 84.00 1008.00
2a5 (Jefferson Av~.) 285 Sherman St. a4.00 1008.00
285 .. " " 285 Logan St. 84.00 1008.00 " 285 " .. " 2a5 Clarkson St. 84.00 1008.00 I 285 " " " 285 Downing St. 84.00 1008.00
285 (E. Hampden Ave.) 2a5 Gilpin St. a4.00 lOOa.oo
~. -J -.... -. "' . . . TOTAL $2,268.00 $27,216 .00 .
~ ... ::-·-
, .
• ~
(,.)
1\)
X -;" 0 •
• -• -
-!ll£_) .,
(
EXHIBIT "ll" -SIGNALS
TOTALS
EFFECTIVE JULY". 1, 1975
26 Signals@ $84.00 = $2,184.00
R-1 EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 1, 1975
27 Signals @ $84.00 • $2,268.00
•
•
City of Engle~ood
July 1, 1975
R-1 Nov. 1, 1975
-2-
J--'-
'
•.
• •
0
• •
• -.~
EXH r BIT "C" (SIGNS AND MARKINGS)
LENGTH
~ .!l. ~0 . U.S. NO. LOCATION {MILES~
15 (So. Rroadway) -Raffert,Y Ln. to Je ffenon Ave. 2.20
(U.S. 285)
lR5 (llampden Ave.) 285 Jason St. to Down ing St . 1.44
TOTAL 3.64
I
I
.·
·.
• • ~
a •
'·
t..l-..UiJcnuvu
COST/ COST/ COST/
MI/1-40. .J1.L YEAR
$125.00 $275.00 $3,300.00
125.00 180.00 21160.00
$250 .00 $455.00 $5,460.00
I
·~
I
1
I
•
~
I
.
'
•
" \
•
-, .
•
ROLL CALL
L {2oJ
'r;[ Moved Seconded Absent
or
•
• I . •
0
· .
• 1
•
•
•
-~
1)1/>~ 1 DP ;;;r7&
•
• •
,_
• .
,.
-)-
..
I ·
,_ •
• . -• ~~
•
'
•
• I . •
·' \ I ' • "'
,_ • -
0
• < . .
~~-J-
Abstain Ab sent
•
• •
0
•
•
•. -• • .. .
-~------~~--~
ROLL CALL
1.,tf/.1 oved Seconded Ave Nav Abstain Absent
W1111ams 7
_../ So vern ( v 5m1th J
1fann 7
Brown " ClaytOn I
Mavor 1 aYT or {
•
•
I . .
0
. ' •
•
•. -0 l •
•
ROLL CALL
OV econ e A N ~ye av Ab sta n Ab sent
~ Williams (/
v--So vern I/'
:,m1tn t/
~ann j/~/
Brown V /
Clayton (/
l'layor Taylor v ..
•
• • •
0
(.
. , .• \ ! .
'! •
•
0 t•
•
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Absta n sen
~ Williams __t.-::
L---So vern v~
Slnfth v
Mann ,/
Brown v
Clayton v
Mayor Taylor v
•
• I . .
0
•
.. -•
-• •
_J i-
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Abstain Absent
or
'
• • •
0
•
•
0 t•
•
-·-----~ -
.h ___ _
A bstain Absent
'
[j
~
,<;,
~
• I . •
0
r 32xl
•
•
•. . ~· •
ROLL CALL
OV econ ded A '\ye IY s n sent
Williams C./
( So vern v
~ :lllllt.n y 1---
Mann t/ ,__ Brown v 1---
{;Jayton v v
Mayor Taylor V"'
•
• •
0
' · . . ,
•
•
• . -• t•
•
ROLL CALL
..
•
• • •
0
•
•
•. -
• t•
•
ov lYe IV sta n bsent
Williams /_,./ ./
~ So vern t/' .-'
~ !11111tn v
v---~nn -L
Brown y
Clayton J/
l'layor Taylor ,../""
• • •
0
f lr •
•
•
0 I•
•
' ·-
ROLL CALL
M ed ov Seconded A ~e Nay A bsta n A bsent
c.--~ Wf_l11ams ~
So vern V'
:llll1tn v .....--Plann v v
Brown V'
l.lllyton 1/
Playor Taylor £/""
'
• I . •
0
'
. ,
• r 32xl
• -• .
• •
"~ .,...-_.,. ---~ -..,
-v/i likJ
1 tl /,;:fit ROLL CALL
~ Secoodod
r•p··
I
Abstain Absent
---
' -U/~
~//?----
•
• I . •
0
-. -.•1
• . , '
• -• .
• • . .
ROLL CALL
Moved s d econ ed Ave Nav Abstain Absent
Williams t/
So vern 1//
Slllftll v -
Mann v
Brown 1/ / .... Clayton 17
Mavor la:Ylor 1/' ..
•
• • •
0
· . . .
•
, . •
I•
•
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Abstain Absent
W1111ams J/
So vern v _...
,__---siiiTtfl -t/ -
(...--lofann ,/'
Brown v I--
··cra-vton v -----~orlavlor I,/ ..
•
• I . •
0
f
•
• -•
• •
ROLL CALL
Abstain Absent
'
• I . •
f
0
I
I
. , f •
•
0 ,.
·. -
ROLL CALL
M d S d d ove econ e A ~Ye Nay Abstain Absent
Williams
So vern
:,nll'tn
Mann
Brown
1.1ay'ton
Mayor Taylor
• I · •
0
• . , .• \ ! . .,.
•
0
•
ROLL CALL
Mov~Seconded Aye Nay Abstain Absent
1/ Williams
So vern
:,ntltn
Mann
Brown ..
1..1ayton
Mayor Taylor
•
• •
• 0
•
•
0 -
..
•
CITY COUNCIL MEETING -January 3, 1977
-Regular
'
I .
-
•
•
Englewood City Council Meeting
January 3, 1977
•
0 -••
* * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Taylor: Mr. John Criswell?
"' .
Criswell: Mr. Mayor, I am suffering from some sort of wild disease that
is going around. They say that one man's salt is another man's
sugar, and the fact that I am suffering this evening means I
am not going to talk for very long.
I am appearing this evening at our request, again on behalf of
the three businesses whose business location has been acquired
by the City--Phil's Auto Clinic, C & L Auto Body, and A & B
Transmission.
Mayor Taylor: Would you identify yourself, please?
Criswell: John A. Criswell, Attorney at Law, 3780 South Broadway, Englewood,
Colorado. Knowing that I normally talk too long and that I can't
talk very well this evening, I have prepared a little outline that
I would like to present to Council if I may.
Very quickly, and I would like the permission of Council for each
of my clients to address Council, but very quickly let me say this.
The three businesses at roughly 25 East Girard, two of them were
in existence , well all three of them had been in existence for
some period of time and either they or their predecessors have
occupied those premises for a number of years. None of them had
any written leases. They did originally, but the written leases
run out and since then they occupied it on a month-to-month
tenancy.
I have indicated in my little memo here that there could be some
legal claim that, even though they were not on a written lease,
in view of the fact that they or their predecessors have occupied
the premises for a number of years, there could be some legal
claim made, in my view, that they are entitled to, quote -
compens ation -unquote, just like a person who would occupy
the premises on a long-term lease. Furthermore, the statutes
of the State of Colorado make clear, and this City makes clear
and the federal government makes clear, that were the property
that was acquired by the City acquired through federal funds
there would have been no question but what there would have been
certain relocation expenses paid to them. Now I can understand
from the City's point of view that if you don't have federal
funds it makes a difference. But from a landowner's point of
view, it makes no difference if the City acquires this property
through federal funds, through sales tax, through State funds,
or through City funds. The problems presented to him are the
name. And, again, I think it is possible to make a legal claim,
-1-
'
'
• •
-
Criswell:
•
•
•
,. . •
0 -
(cont.) that if the City is going to pay some property owners
for some tenants' relocation assistance it should pay all. But
I am not here this evening to talk about legalities.
I have attached to my little "poop-sheet" if you will, some
estimates of what has actually occurred with these three
individuals. I think that you must understand that unlike
many businesses, and certainly unlike a residence, the nature
of this business meant there were very few properties they
could move into. And when they did find a property they could
move into, because of the nature of their business there are
very few structures built to take this kind of business. You
have special drainage problems. You have special waste problems.
And, for example, if I can turn for just a moment to the last
attachment relating to C & L Auto Body, he had in the premises
that he was occupying a paint booth that met all the require-
ments of the City Code and so forth. The paint booth was not
very attractive to look at, but it served its purpose. When
he moved he could not take this thing apart and put it back
together again to meet City Code. And as a result, through
no fault of the City, we're not saying it is the City's fault
aside from the fact that the City acquired the property and
are going to tear the property down, it meant that he had to
spend almost $9,000 just to recreate a paint booth in accordance
with the Building Code.
I have tried to estimate expenses here, and I want each of these
individuals merely to stand up and explain to you the problems
they have had. In each case, these individuals had estimates
that said it would cost them roughly $1,500 to move their facilities.
In no case did they dig down in their jeans and do that. They did
it themselves. They rented some trucks, got help from friends, etc.
In each case they had to spend anywhere from a couple thousand
dollars up to nine thousand dollars to find other facilities. In
each case the facilities that they are renting now or are paying
for now, and Phil Pickell of Phil's Auto Body instead of ·leasing
went out and bought a piece of property, but in each case the
monthly payments they are having to pay, whether it be in the form
of rent or in the form of payments on a loan, it is anywhere from
double to three times what they were paying at the premises they
were at. And finally, since June they have paid the City in rentals
anywhere from $1,250 to, as I recall, $1,750, because some moved
s o oner than others •
I guess what I am saying is, and I am pleading more out of the
sense of equity and fairness than I am as an attorney, but if you
had some residents living on a piece of property that happened to
be a project where the federal government was going to reLnburse
you, you would pay them all of their moving expenses. There is
no way that we could legitimately claim that this City is responsible
for any of our remodeling expenses because that happened. It is
unfortunate that they had to extend what they had to extend, but
it is true.
-2-
. ,
• •
·' ' r ,
'r
Criswell:
•
•
•
•
-
(c ont.) I thought wh e n I first appeared b efore Cou ncil , a nd I
apologize for not getting back to Council sooner but it was
apparently a breakdown of communications between the staff and
I, but I thought at that time, and this was as I recall in July
or August or thereabouts, that perhaps the thing that might be
fair under the circumstances would be for my clients to agree
,. -
to get out of the property as qui c kly as pos sible so that the
City would have it and be able to demolish it and work with it,
which they have done. And in return instead of the City coming
up with any money, that in return the Ci ty might forgive the
rent that they would have otherwise charged for those few months
that they would be there, which was anywhere from five to six
or seven months, as I recall. Unfortunately, and I will take
the blame for it, the communications broke down and as a con-
sequence they continued to pay the City anywhere from $1,200
to $1,700.
It does seem to me though that, under these peculiar circum-
stances and under the doctrine of just plain old fairness,
fo rget about what the law is and what the law isn't, that
these individuals are entitled, it seems to me, to be considered
to have reimbursed t o them at least what it would have typically
cos t them to move based on the Weicker ~stimates. Or as an
alternative that the City could at least forgive and return
to them the rent that they paid the City over the past five
to seven months, which they have t~ken out of their pockets
and paid the City.
I would like to have, if I may Mr. Mayor, each of my clients
merely take two or three minutes to explain to you the sort of
problems we have run into.
Let me give you one example. And again, we mean no criticism
of the City; but let me give you an example of what this has
run into. Phil's Auto Clinic, for example, went out and bought
a piece of property. The property he bought was completely
properly zoned. There were no problems about that. It had
plumbing and was hooked up to the sewer, but the property he
bought happened to be a two-story building. I suspect, although
I didn't see it, that it was a little bit like my office. But
instead of remodeling that building, that two-story building,
like I did, he tore the thing down and put up a completely new
• building . Now as I understand it, the building that was there,
th e two-story building, was already being used for commercia l
development. But bec ause he put a new structure on the premises
rather than using the old structure, it was necessary, and even
though that old structure had been hooked up to the sewer line,
when he put the new building on there and hooked it up to the
s e wer line he had to pay an additional $650 just for the sewer
tap fee. Now 1 am not talking about being critical of paying a
sewer tap fee. Apparently that is what the ordinances call for •
But it is an expense that the typical individual would not have
-3-
'
• •
,
•
•
Criswell:
Mann:
Criswell:
Mann:
•
0 •• •
(cont.) gone through. And it is not an expense that most
persons who are being moved out of a situation would have to
pay for.
I would, if I may, unless Council has questions of me right
now, like to call upon each of my three c}ients to spend just
two or three minutes each summarizing some of the problems
they have run into.
On that particular case about the sewer tap fee, was he notified
of that before he tore the old building down and built the new
one?
I don't know whether he was or not, Councilman Mann .
I would like to ask Mr. Pickell.
Criswell: I am not complaining about the sewer tap fee. I don't mean to
have you misconstrue what I am saying. I don't mean to criticise
the City for the tap fee. I am just saying that this is the type
of expenses that these people have been put to. And I am not
saying that it is an illegitimate expense. I am just saying it
is an expense that the typical individual who had been occupying
a home or a residence could have moved with no problems and would
have had no expenses other than the moving expenses.
Mayor Taylor: Any questions from Council? Alright, Mr. Criswell, wou~d you
bring your clients up and have them identify themselves.
Pickell: Gentlemen of the Council, Phil Pickell, owner of Phil's Auto
Clinic, now located at 3741 South Kalamath, as of January 3rd.
Criswell: That is inside the City of Englewood?
Pickell: That's right. Really, I don't know where to begin other than
talking with Mayor James Taylor, Councilman Clayton and Council-
man Vernon Mann on these particular problems. Number one, our
attorney John Criswell has already mentioned the sewer hook-up
as an expense. Reprinting of all papers, business forms, and
signs. Public Service for a gas tap. Phone Company to transfer
phones from one location to another. Moving myself with voluntary
help from some very good friends. That's about it, other than the
$40,000 building.
Mayor Taylor: l would like to ask you a question, Mr. Pickell. When did you
buy the property that you are building on?
Pickell: Give or take a few months, about four years ago.
Mayor Taylor: And what were your plans for the property?
Pickell: Plans then were to build a building but not at this particular
time.
-4-
'
• •' I !
or
'
• •
-
•
•
•
• ,. -
0 -
Mayor Taylor: I see. What was your new address again?
Pickell: 3741 South Kalamath.
Mayor Taylor: Any other questions from Council to Mr. Pickell? Let me ask you
one then, Phil. If I understood Mr. Criswell, you would be willing
to assume your expenses if the rent was forgiven from the time
that we acquired the property until you moved?
Pickell: Speaking for myself, but we would meet with John Criswell, but I
would say yes.
Mayor Taylor: Ok. Any other questions from Council to Mr. Pickell? Don Smith?
Smith:
Pickell:
Smith:
Mr. Pickell, when did you plan on moving when you originally
bought the property that you are now located at?
Roughly two years from this year, say 1978 or 1979. My plans
then were to pay for the property and then to put the building
up. But the way it stands now I had to dig in the sock to pay
for the ground before I could find anybody to finance the
building, because they won't finance a building unless the
ground is free and clear.
Thank you.
Mayor Taylor: Any other questions? Councilman Mann?
Mann:
Pickell:
Mann:
Pickell:
Mann:
Pickell:
How much notice were you given by the City?
The same as everybody else. I would guess April or May.
In days .•. one month, two months, nine days, one hundred days?
On the moving of the location that I was in?
Yes, when you were to vacate the building.
The letter we received was roughly April or May to be out by
January 1.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Smith?
Smith:
Pickell:
Smith:
Pickell:
It is my understanding from your counsel, Mr. Criswell, that none
of you had long-term leases •
No, sir.
May I ask at least personally, because I know you can't answer
for the rest of them, why, with the kind of investment you had
and knowing what it would cost to move, didn't you protect yourself
with a long-term lease?
Well, originally when I moved in there roughly nine years ago it
was owned by Julius Bizzard; and he in turn sold it to Larry Mason
-5-
• . , ·' \ !
'!
• •
0
-
•
•
•
Pickell:
Smith:
Pickell:
Smith:
Pickell:
•
-
(cont.) of Mason's Auto Parts in Littleton. The original owner
of A & B Transmission and myself approached Larry Mason for a
lease year-to-year; and at that particular time he said he would
come up with a lease, which he never did. He kept it on month-
to-month.
He just said that he would in time, but he never ended up doir.g it?
Yes, he said if we needed a lease he would give us a lease; but
he preferred keeping it month-to-month.
And you never pushed it?
No, I never pushed it.
Smith: Thank you.
Criswell: Did you have a written lease at one time?
Pickell: Yes, years ago with Julius Bizzard.
Criswell: How long have you been on the property?
Pickell: Since January of 1968.
Criswell: But you did have a lease at one time?
Pickell: Yes, one year with Julius Bizzard.
Criswell: At that time the lease had run out and the new man was there and
you asked him for a written lease and he said if you needed one
to let him know and he would give you one?
Pickell: Right.
Criswell: And that was eight years ago?
Pickell: Yes, right.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Brown?
Brown: Yes, your honor, may I ask if you had any problem getting your
gas connection with your new building?
Pickell: Over at the original location where I moved from I had two
2 ,000 furnaces for a total of 4,000 BTU's. And I had a meter
with 375 kilometers, or whatever Public Service rates it at;
and when I purchased the property down here it had a 175 meter
which I had to sign for the rights to keep it for "X" amount
of years or I would lose the rights. As it is right now, I
have ten inches of insulation in the roof, five-eights dry
wall, and two furnaces totaling 2,000. Right now, like I say,
this is my first day in there and I can't tell you how it is
-6-
'
I • •
f
-
•
•
•
•
t• -
Pickell: (cont.) of Mason's Auto Parts in Littleton. The original owner
of A & B Transmission and myself approached Larry Mason for a
lease year-to-year; and at that particular time he said he would
come up with a lease, which he never did. He kept it on month-
to-month.
;-
Smith: He just said that he would in time, but he never ended up doing it?
Pickell: Yes, he said if we needed a lease he would give us a l e ase; but
he preferred keeping it month-to-month.
Smith: And you never pushed it?
Pickell: No, I never pushed it.
Smith: Thank you.
Criswell: Did you have a written lease at one time?
Pickell: Yes, years ago with Julius Bizzard.
Criswell: How long have you been on the property?
Pickell: Since January of 1968.
Criswell: But you did have a lease at one time?
Pickell: Yes, one year with Julius Bizzard.
Criswell: At that time the lease had run out and the new man was there and
you asked him for a written lease and he said if you needed one
to let him know and he would give you one?
Pickell: Right.
Criswell: And that was eight years ago?
Pickell: Yes, right.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Brown?
Brown: Yes, your honor, may I ask if you had any problem getting your
gas connection with your new building?
Pickell: Over at the original location where I moved from I had two
2,000 furnaces for a total of 4,000 BTU's. And I had a meter
with 375 kilometers, or whatever Public Service rates it at;
and when I purchase d the property down here it had a 175 meter
which I had to sign for the rights to keep it for ''X" amount
of years or I would lose the rights. As it is right now, I
have ten inches of insulation in the roof, five-eights dry
wall, and two furnaces totaling 2,000. Right now, like I say,
this is my first day in there and I can't tell you how it is
-6-
• .. •' I !
'T
I • •
•
•
•
0
•
Pickell: (cont.) going to be when it is zero. That was my concern on
trying to get one small meter to add to the one small one I had
to get 375,000 BTU's.
Brown: Thank you.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Smith?
,. .
Smith: Did you at one time, if I remember right because I don't have it
in front of me, but did you request permission to take the other
meter from this location?
Pickell: Yes. I discussed it with Mayor Taylor, City Manager Andy McCown,
and the two Councilmen Dave Clayton and Vern Mann.
Smith: Is that still your desire?
Pickell: Preferably, yes.
Mayor Taylor: In our study session tonight we finally got confirmation from
Public Service Company that we have enough gas and you can have
a meter.
Pickell: That's what I understand, yes. I was told the City has no worry
on gas.
Mayor Taylor: Well, we didn't know that until we got written confirmation from
Public Service; and we find now that we do have enough that we
can allow you to have the meter that you come to see me about.
Pickell: Fine, thank you. I appreciate it.
Mayor Taylor: You are welcome.
Mann: I would like to go back to the lease a minute, and I would like
to ask the City Manager a question. Would it have made any
difference in the relocation change if he had had a lease
for a year or five years? How do you handle a case like that?
McCown: Well, when we purchased the property, in accordance with the
Council's policy, we would not consider any relocation expenses.
I assume, and probably John could help me out more here, that
if they had had a lease with the people they were leasing the
building from there would be some settlement between that party
and Mr. Pickell. I don't think it would be between the City
and Mr. Pickell.
Mann:
Criswell:
You mean ••. let me get it straight, John. Would that have been
a greater expense for Mr. Pickell than these other people if
they would have had the lease?
Well, let's state what I think would be a clear example and
work backwards. Let's assume that Phil and these other people
-7-
I • •
·' \ !
Criswell:
McCown:
Criswell:
Caughlan:
•
•
•
" -•
-
(cont.) had a two-year lease. I disagree with the City Manager
and you can che~k with your City Attorney. If you wanted us out
of there before that lease terminated, you would have paid us to
get us out of there. Because merely buying the property from
the owner would not have given you the lease hold rights, and
we have discussed lease hold rights. We didn't ha~ a lease,
though, so there is no question about us not having a lease.
I think from a very practical standpoint, and as you can see
Phil has been there now for eight years; and all the others had,
in the absence of the City purchasing it, a reasonable expecta-
tion of staying there for several more years whether they had
a written lease or not. Had there been a written lease and had
you wanted to get the property sooner than the written lease
would have run out, there would have had to been some sort of
settlement.
I would concur with that, but as far as the relocation expenses ••.
No, I agree. Let me cut this short, because I do want one
problem discussed because it is a unique problem and it gets
me. So if I may, let me call the owner of C & L Auto Bo dy
to tell you his problem with one particular aspect of this
thing. Would you come up and tell them about the paint thing.
I'm Charlie Caughlan, owner of C & L Auto Body, at 1864 West
Dartmouth in Englewood. We have been there for about four
months now. The biggest problem I had was with my paint booth.
I don't know how many of you have been connected with the
Building Department or know anything about it, but the Code
is pretty strict on it . What we had before was a two-by-four
and sheet rock paint booth, which met all the Codes. I come
up and talked with the Building Department about trying to
tear it down and rebuild it, and they didn't actually say no
but they just started raising so much commotion about it that
I figured it wasn't worth the hastle. So then l just went
ahead and got a new spray booth. It is an Elvis spray booth
which is pretty much used all over the country. It is one of
t he t o p three booths sold. It set me back, and you have some
of the figures before you there. It was quite a bit of money
to get this booth up. Even with this booth I run into some
problems. The electrical inspector came down and looked at
the lights one day. He was going to give an inspection on it.
He got real excited because he couldn't see an Underwriter
• Laboratory sticker stuck on the side of the light. I had
some confirmation that said they were approved by Underwriters,
and he got me a little upset but after we both settled down we
got it all straightened out. So that is one of the main problems
that I have. Now in this building we have acquired, we have
almost had to build a new building. We had to put in a
plumbing system, a sand trap, we had to redo some of the wiring
in the building to bring some of it up to Code because it
wouldn't pass, and it has cost me quite a bit of money to
make this move.
-8-
•
I • 0
-
•
•
•
•
Cau.ghlan: (cont.) And then the City is in the process of widening
Dartmouth, which hasn't helped business any either. So it
has really been q~ite a struggle for me.
Mayor Taylor: Your estimated cost of moving is $1,635?
Caughlan: Yes.
Mayor Taylor: Is that over and above your paint booth?
Caughlan: Yes, that estimate from Weicker's was figuring for carpenter
and forklif t to tear it apart and transport it with everything
else in the shop.
Mayor Taylor: You are talking about the paint booth?
Caughlan: Yes, it was figured in the transporting.
Mayor Taylo r: So your total outlay was $1,635?
Caughlan: Yes, at that time from Weicker's.
Mayor Taylor: And how many months were you in the building over here that
you paid the City rent on?
Caughlan: I bought the business •.•
Mayor Taylor: No, I mean since we sent you the letter that you must move in
April. You moved when?
Caughlan: From this building, we moved in October.
Mayor Taylor: So you were there from ... Andy informs me we sent the letter out
for vacation in April, wasn't it John?
Criswell: I think I figured five months.
Mayor Taylor: Five months. And how much rent were you paying?
Caughlan: $250 a month.
Mayor Taylor: To the City of Englewood?
Caughlan: Yes. And also, I talked to Larry Mason several times about
trying to acquire a lease also. He kept saying he would get
us a lease, but it was all talk and that was about it.
Mayor Taylor : In other words, he paid $1,450 to the City of Englewood
in five months for rent, if my mathematics is correct.
$1,250 , I mean.
Mc Cown: $1,250.
Mayor Taylor: Any further questions?
-9-
•
'
• •
0
. ,
-
•
•
•
Mann:
Caughlan:
Mayor Taylor:
Caughlan:
•
•
Is it alright to assume that your total expenditures cost you
$10,647.17 to move?
, .
Yes, sir. That is what I put out of my pocket and have receipts
for.
Wait a minute, I am looking at this.
That is just the Weicker receipt that we got to move the business
to another location. In fact, we had another agency come in
to look a while back to find out about moving the paint booth
alone and they give me an approximation. They didn't want to
give me a definite figure, but they were quoting me more like
$800 to $1,200 just to move the paint booth. So, if that be
the case, Weicker would be off even more. So, I don't know.
Clayton: On one of the items you have on here, and I am not condemning
at all but just trying to do some separation, but some are
actually improvements in your business. Had you done it either
way, they would be improvements or upgrading factor for your
business.
Caughlan: Yes. Not all of them, though. Like the plumbing, of course,
was something I already had in the old building. But the new
building, and I don't know how many of you gentlemen have tried
to acquire a building for a business, but it is very hard to
find a building suitable for a body shop that will still get
you through the Codes. The building we acquired is actually
larger than I wanted, but I couldn't find one actually the size
I wanted. So we were getting in a bind and only had a few
months left, so we took it. We had a lot of expenses there,
just like putting up the fence . The fence expense was actually
the expense that I put up just for the front part of the fence
which I did myself. The landlord did take care of the rest of
the fence . It was the City that said I did have to have a fence
to keep cars behind, that I couldn't just have them sitting in
the yard. So I was more or less forced into building a fence
whether I wanted it or not.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Smith?
Smith: You also approached Mr. Mason about a lease, you said?
Caughlan: • Yes, sir •
Smith:
Caughlan:
If you were aware that it would cost you such a large amount of
money should you ever have to move, why didn't you pressure him
to give you a lease?
At the time I wasn't aware that it would cost that much money.
If I had been aware, I probably would have done a lot of things
differently than I did. I might have just even went out of
business, but after you have had a business for a while and are
already into it you can't hardly quit. You have got to keep going.
-lo-
'
•
'
I • •
0
.• \ !
I
'!
-
Smith:
Caughlan:
Smith:
Caughlan:
Williams:
Caughlan:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
•
•
•
•
•
How long have you been at this location?
The new location?
The old one.
The old one ••• a year ago last October. It would be a year and
three months.
Was the business there that you bought?
IJI -
Yes.
that
many
shop
It was a prior business that belonged to Richards. Before
it was Custom Automotive. There has been I don't know how
body shops in that building. I think it has been a body
for at least six or seven years.
Any other questions? Thank you. John?
I am going to quit with just saying two things, if I may, and
then I am going to sit down. Number one, I didn't present
these figures here tonight with any expectation of the City
picking up the tab. I don't mean that at all. The figures
are merely presented so these individuals ••. sure, I'm sure
that in many instances they have had an improvement; but they
wouldn't have had to have the expenses at this point had it
not been for the City's acquisition.
Secondly, I understand the City policy. I understand that
probably if the City had its choice it wouldn't pay relocation
expenses to anybody. I understand it is the federal regulations
and state law that require the City to pay relocation expenses
to somebody. But I want you, if you will, whether the federal
government forces you to do it or not, how can this City Council
justify paying some citizens relocation allowances and not
paying others. I recognize you to say to me because we have
federal money; but so far as citizens are concerned, how can
you justify saying to Citizen A that if he has to move out of
his house and move to another house where there are no expenses
other than moving expenses, that you are going to pay those
moving expenses for them. But to a citizen and businessman
in Englewood who is going to have to go to some expenses that
would not be reimbursable in any case, how do you justify saying
to one citizen that you are going to pay the moving expenses and
• to another citizen saying you are not going to pay anything .
I understand and could understand if this City adopted the
policy of not paying anybody. That's fine. But I am standing
in front of you saying I don't think if you are going to let
the federal government call the tune on federal government
money ••• you have got to treat the citizen when you don't have
federal government money the same way.
We are not asking for nine or ten or twelve thousand dollars.
I do think these people are entitled to some aid. I do think
a reasonable solution would have been to have let them stay
-11-
••
'
I • •
f
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
•
McCown:
Mayor Taylor:
•
•
•
0 ..
(cont.) there without paying rent and let them use the rent
money for their moving expenses. And that is what I am asking
for now.
I recognize, and I am going to face it right in its eyes, that
if you authorize this you may be against your policy. But I
don't think your policy is a good one anyway if it means
discriminating against some citizens merely based on the
proposition of whether you get federal money or not.
John, I would like to ask you this. Maybe I am speaking too
much as a mayor and should have the Council ask questions,
but this popped into my mind. When you are talking about
where we reimbursed other people for relocation, who are
you talking about?
Well, it is my understanding that every piece of property
the City has bought where federal funds are involved •••
I am talking about where federal funds aren't involved.
I am saying you haven't, as far as I know. And I am saying
how do you justify that. How do you justify paying the people
that you move out to create a park •••
Who did we do this for?
Well, all of your federal money .•• all the parks you acquired
through federal money you paid people moving expenses.
We had to because it is a federal law.
Exactly . You didn't have to. You didn't have to accept the
federal money.
That's true.
Ok. I'm not being facetious. But I am saying how do you
justify going to Citizen A •••
Well, I have an answer to that. That is the reason I asked
you this question. Now maybe not an answer but a thought.
I am thinking of some of the property that had houses on it
down at our river redevelopment where the golf course is.
It is my understanding, and I am certainly to be corrected
if I am wrong, but we have dealt directly with the owner of
that property.
We paid relocation on those.
But there was federal money involved. I can't think of any
case where we paid money where we weren't required to as you
say, or not get the money from the federal government.
-12-
••
I • •
-· \ I . ,
•
•
•
..
Criswell: I understand that, and from the City's point of view that might
make sense. But what is the difference between these three
citizens and the citizens that you did pay relocation allowances
to?
Mayor Taylor: None. But our Charter states that we are not to pay relocation
money unless it is federally funded.
Criswell: I am not aware of that at all.
McCown: It is not a Charter provision, your honor. It is just merely
a policy that Council has followed for years, that if there are
no federal funds involved that the City will not pay the
relocation expenses. If there are federal funds, we will
pay them; and not because we approve of the federal policy
necessarily, but because the federal policy does say that
we must pay the relocation expenses. They include in their
grant to the City an amount of money that is sufficient to
pay those relocation expenses.
Criswell: Well, relocation expenses are not unique to the federal
government. Nor is it unique to governments. When J.M.
moved from New Jersey out here all of those people that were
moved were paid relocation expenses by J.M. And all I am
saying is, I recognize the budgetary problems of the City of
Englewood. And I recognize that to the City when you have
federal funds or not it makes a difference. But how, from a
citizens point of view, do you go to these citizens and say
you are not going to pay them a penny.
Mayor Taylor: Well, we haven't said that yet.
Criswell: I understand that. I don't mean that. But how do you justify
saying to these people that you aren't going to pay any moving
expenses, whereas at the same time we are acquiring a lot of
property through federal programs and every one of those people,
whether owners or tenants or whatever, are going to get their
moving expenses paid.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Clayton?
Clayton: Mr. Criswell, you made no mention of the A & B Transmission and
Gear Company. I am assuming that all you are asking for there
is the $1,350.
Criswell:
Clayton:
Criswell:
Yes .
They seem to have considerably less expenses.
Well, I didn't call him for that reason. As a matter of fact,
I think Phil's had probably less remodeling expenses. The
difference, of course, with Phil is that he put all this
money into his own property. He had $40,000 more, but that
was because he was building a building. These other two
-13-
'
•
• .
• •
0
f
-
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Smith:
Criswell:
Smith:
Criswell:
Smith:
•
Mayor Taylor:
• Mann:
Mayor Taylor:
•
•
•
(cont.) individuals, A & B Transmission and C & L Auto Body,
is money that hopef~lly, in the case of C & L will be able to
remove that paint shop, but if he can't that is down the tube;
as well as A & B Transmission remodeling another person's
property.
I didn't mean to put these figures down to say that you ought
to pay us this. I didn't mean that. I am merely reflecting
what the move has cost them. Now in many instances they are
going to have better facilities. There is no question about
that. But it wasn't their choice to pay it right now, but
they had to. And I guess, really, forgetting about the law
.. -
and the figures; I'm saying, and I say this very honestly and
sincerely, I just don't see how this City can adopt a dual
policy of buying some property and moving people out and paying
expenses for them, and buying other property and moving people
out but not paying their expenses. From the citizens point of
view, it makes no difference whether you have "Uncle Sugar"
behind you or not. I think it is a matter of fairness and
equality. You ought to adopt a uniform policy. And I am
sorry, I may be going against what this Council has said
before; but that is how I feel, and I am going to stand
by it.
I think Councilman Smith has something.
I think in light of what we are looking at, I happen to
disagree with the attorney that we ought to pay relocation
expenses because I think they are negotiable. But I do feel
that ••• where did A & B Transmission move to?
2405 West Hampden.
All of them stayed in Englewood?
A & B did not.
Ok, I would like to, and I do disagree with relocation expenses
when the City is involved because I think we are a unique entity.
I want to make a motion to get this on the floor so we can more
intelligently discuss it.
I would like to move that we deny all relocation expenses, but
that we do allow for A & B Transmission to repay the rental
paid to the City in the amount of $1,550; that we reimburse
Phil's Auto Clinic for rent paid in the amount of $1,750; and
that we reimburse C & L Auto Body the amount of $1,250 for
rent paid.
You have heard the motion. Is there a second?
Yes, I'll second it.
Councilman Mann seconded it. Discussion? Question.
-14-
'
••
·.
0 ,
·' \ !
'!'
I • •
-
•
•
James:
Smith:
James:
Mann:
James:
Brown:
James:
Clayton:
James:
Taylor:
James:
Smith:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
•
0 .. -
Councilman Smith?
Yes.
Mann?
Yes.
Brown?
Yes.
Clayton?
Yes.
Mayor Taylor?
Yes.
Five ayes, no nays, your honor.
I want to comment on that motion. I want that motion very clear
that we denied all relocation expenses.
Mr. Criswell?
I am just going to rescue my pipe and say thank you very much.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-15-
•.
'
• •
0
'
......
•
•
•
Englewood City Council Meeting
January 3, 1977
•
..
* * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Taylor: Mr. John Criswell?
Criswell: Mr. Mayor, I am suffering from some sort of wild disease that
is going around. They say that one man's salt is another man's
sugar, and the fact that I am suffering this evening means I
am not going to talk for very long.
I am appearing this evening at our request, again on behalf of
the three businesses whose business location has been acquired
by the City--Phil's Auto Clinic, C & L Auto Body, and A & B
Transmission.
Mayor Taylor: Would you identify yourself, please?
Criswell: John A. Criswell, Attorney at Law, 3780 South Broadway, Englewood,
Colorado. Knowing that 1 normally talk too long and that I can 't
talk very well this evening, I have prepared a little outline that
I would like to present to Council if I may.
Very quickly, and I would like the permission of Council for each
of my clients to address Council, but very quickly let me say this.
The three businesses at roughly 25 East Girard, two of them were
in existence, well all three of them had been in existence for
some period of time and either they or their predecessors have
occupied those premises for a number of years. None of them had
any written leases. They did originally, but the written leases
run out and since then they occupied it on a month-to-month
tenancy.
I have indicated in my little memo here that there could be some
legal claim that, even though they were not on a written lease,
in view of the fact that they or their predecessors have occupied
the premises for a number of years, there could be some legal
claim made, in my view, that they are entitled to, quote -
compensation -unquote, just like a person who would occupy
the premises on a long-term lease. Furthermore, the statutes
of the State of Colorado make clear, and this City makes clear
and the federal government makes clear, that were the property
that was acquired by the City acquired through federal funds
there would have been no question but what there would have been
certain relocation expenses paid to them. Now I can understand
from the City's point of view that if you don't have federal
funds it makes a difference. But from a landowner's point of
view, it makes no difference if the City acquires this property
through federal funds, through sales tax, through State funds,
or through City funds. The problems presented to him are the
same. And, again, I think it is possible to make a legal claim,
-1-
'
I • •
0
-
Criswell:
•
•
,. -•
0 , .
•
(cont.) that i f the City is going to pay some property owners
for some tenants' relo cation assistance it should pay all. But
I am not here this evening to talk about legalities.
I have attached to my little "poop-sheet" if you will, some
estimates of what has actually occurred with these three
individuals. I think that you must understand that unlike
many businesses, and certainly unlike a residence, the nature
of this business meant there were very few properties they
could move into. And when they did find a property they could
move into, because of the nature of their business there are
very few structures built to take this kind of business. You
have special drainage problems. You have special waste proble ms.
And, for example, if I can turn for just a moment to the last
attachment relating to C & L Auto Body, he had in the premises
that he was occupying a paint booth that met all the require-
ments of the City Code and so forth. The paint booth was not
very attractive to look at, but it served its purpose. When
he moved he could not take this thing apart and put it back
together again to meet City Code. And as a result, through
no fault of the City, we're not saying it is the City's fault
aside from the fact that the City acquired the property and
are going to tear the property down, it meant that he had to
spend almost $9,000 just to recreate a paint booth in accordance
with the Building Code.
I have tried to estimate expenses here, and I want each of these
individuals merely to stand up and explain to you the problems
they have had. In each case, these individuals had estimates
that said it would cost them roughly $1,500 to move their facilities.
In no case did they dig down in their jeans and do that. They did
it themselves. They rented some trucks, got help from friends, etc.
In each case they had to spend anywhere from a couple thousand
dollars up to nine thousand dollars to find other facilities. In
each case the facilities that they are renting now or are paying
for now, and Phil Pickell of Phil's Auto Body instead of leasing
went out and bought a piece of property, but in each case the
monthly payments they are having to pay, whether it be in the form
of rent or in the form of payments on a loan, it is anywhere from
double to three times what they were paying at the premises they
were at. And finally, since June they have paid the City in rentals
anywhere from $1,250 to, as I recall, $1,750, because some moved
sooner than others.
I guess what I am saying is, and I am pleading more out of the
sense of equity a nd fairness than I am as an attorney, but if you
had some r esidents living on a piece of property that happened to
be a project where the federal government was going to reimburse
you, you would pay them all of their moving expenses. There is
no way that we could legitimately claim that this City is responsible
for any of our remodeling expenses because that happened. It is
unfortunate that they had to extend what they had to extend, but
it is true.
-2-
. , •
I • •
0
Criswell:
•
•
•
•
0
•
(c ont.) I thought when I first appeared before Council, and I
apologize for not getting back to Council sooner but it was
apparently a breakdown of communications between the staff and
I, but I thought at that time, and this was as I recall in July
or August or thereabouts, that perhaps the thing that might be
fair under the cir~umstances would be for my clients to agree
to get out of the property as quickly as possible so that the
City would have it and be able to demolish it and work with it,
which they have done. And in return instead of the City coming
up with any money, that in return the City might forgive the
rent that they would have otherwise charged for those few months
that they would be there, which was anywhere from five to six
or seven months, as I recall. Unfortunately, and I will take
the blame for it, the communications broke down and as a con-
sequence they continued to pay the City anywhere from $1,200
to $1,700.
It does seem to me though that, under these peculiar circum-
stances and under the doctrine of just plain old fairness,
forget about what the law is and what the law isn't, that
these individuals are entitled, it seems to me, to be considered
to have reimbursed to them at least what it would have typically
cost them to move based on the Weicker estimates. Or as an
alternative that the City could at least forgive and return
to them the rent that they paid the City over the past five
to seven months, whi c h they have taken out of their pockets
and paid the City.
I would like to have, if I may Mr. Mayor, each of my clients
merely take two or three minutes to explain to you the sort of
problems we have run into.
Le t me give you one example. And again, we mean no criticism
of the City; but let me give you an example of what this has
run into. Phil's Auto Clinic, for example, went out and bought
a piece of property. The property he bought was completely
properly zoned. There were no problems about that. It had
plumbing and was hooked up to the sewer, but the property he
bought happened to be a two-story building. I suspect, although
I didn't see it, that it was a little bit like my office. But
instead of remodeling that building, that two-story building,
like I did, he tore the thing down and put up a completely new
• build i ng. Now as I understand it, the building that was there,
the two-story building, was already being used for commercial
d e v e lopment. But b ec ause he put a new structure on the premises
rathe r than using the old structure, it was necessary, and even
though tha t old struc ture had been hooked up to the sewer line,
when he put the new building on there and hooked it up to the
sewer line he had to pay an additional $650 just for the sewer
tap fee. Now I am not talking about being critical of paying a
sewer tap fee. Apparently that is what the ordinances call for •
But it is an expense that the typical individual would not have
-3-
•
·' . , I !
'r
• •
•
•
•
Criswell:
Mann:
Criswell:
•
-
(cont.) gone through. And it is not an expense that most
persons who are being moved out of a situation would have to
pay for.
I would, if I may, unless Council has questions of me right
now, like to call upon each of my three clients to spend just
two or three minutes each summarizing some of the problems
they have run into.
On that particular case about the sewer tap fee, was he notified
of that before he tore the old building down and built the new
one?
I don't know whether he was or not, Councilman Mann.
Mann: I would like to ask Mr. Pickell.
Criswell: I am not complaining about the sewer tap fee. I don't mean to
have you misconstrue what I am saying. I don't mean to criticise
the City for the tap fee. I am just saying that this is the type
of expenses that these people have been put to. And I am not
saying that it is an illegitimate expense. I am just saying it
is an expense that the typical individual who had been occupying
a home or a residence could have moved with no problems and would
have had no expenses other than the moving expenses.
Mayor Taylor: Any questions from Council? Alright, Mr. Criswell, would you
bring your clients up and have them identify themselves.
Pickell: Gentlemen of the Council, Phil Pickell, owner of Phil's Auto
Clinic, now located at 3741 South Kalamath, as of January 3rd.
Criswell: That is inside the City of Englewood?
Pickell : That's right. Really, I don't know where to begin other than
talking with Mayor James Taylor, Councilman Clayton and Council-
man Vernon Mann on these particular problems. Number one, our
attorney John Criswell has already mentioned the sewer hook-up
as an expense. Reprinting of all papers, business forms, and
signs. Public Service for a gas tap. Phone Company to transfer
phones from one location to another. Moving myself with voluntary
help from some very good friends. That's about it, other than the
$40,000 building .
Mayor Taylor: I would like to ask you a question, Mr. Pickell. When did you
buy the property that you are building on?
Pickell: Give or take a few months, about four years ago.
Mayor Taylor: And what were your plans for the property?
Pickell : Plans then were to build a building but not at this particular
time.
-4-
'
I • •
0
·. ·' \ !
I
'r
•
•
•
•
0 ,. -
Mayor Taylor: I see. What was your new address again?
Pickell: 3741 South Kalamath.
Mayor Taylor: Any other questions from Council to Mr. Pickell? Let me ask you
one then, Phil. If I understood Mr. Criswell, you would be willin$
to assume your expenses if the rent was forgiven from the time ·
that we acquired the property until you moved?
Pickell: Speaking for myself, but we would meet with John Criswell, but I
would say yes.
Mayor Taylor: Ok. Any other questions from Council to Mr. Pickell? Don Smith?
Smith:
Pickell:
Smith:
Mayor Taylor:
Mann:
Pickell:
Mann:
Pickell:
Mann:
Pickell:
Mayor Taylor:
Smith:
Pickell:
Smith:
Pickell:
Mr. Pickell, when did you plan on moving when you originally
bought the property that you are now located at?
Roughly two years from this year, say 1978 or 1979. My plans
then were to pay for the property and then to put the building
up. But the way it stands now I had to dig in the sock to pay
for the ground before I could find anybody to finance the
building, because they won't finance a building unless the
ground is free and clear.
Thank you.
Any other questions? Councilman Mann?
How much notice were you given by the Cit y?
The same as everybody else. I would guess April or Kay.
In days •.• one month, two months, nine days, one hundred days?
On the moving of the location that I was in?
Yes, when you were to vacat•., the building.
The letter we received was roughly April or May to be out by
January 1 .
Councilman Smith?
It is my understanding from your counsel, Mr. Criswell, that none
of you had long-term leases •
No, sir.
May I ask at least personally, because I know you can't answer
for the rest of them, why, with the kind of investment you had
and knowing what it would cost to move, didn't you protect yourself
with a long-term lease?
Well, originally when I moved in there roughly nine years ago it
was owned by Julius Bizzard; and he in turn sold it to Larry Mason
-5-
'
I • •
0
'32xl
Pickell:
Smith:
Pickell:
Smith:
Pickell:
Smith:
Criswell:
Pickell:
Criswell:
Pickell:
Criswell:
Pickell:
Criswell:
Pickell :
Criswell:
Pickell:
Mayor Taylor:
Brown:
• Pickell:
•
•
• I' -
,. -
(cont.) of Mason's Auto Parts in Littleton. The original owner
of A & B Transmission and myself approached Larry Mason for a
lease year-to-year; and at that particular time he said he would
come up with a lease, which he never did. He kept it on month-
to-month.
He just said that he would in time, but he never ended up doing it?
Yes, he said if we needed a lease he would give us a lease; but
he preferred keeping it month-to-month.
And you never pushed it?
No, I never pushed it.
Thank you.
Did you have a written lease at one time?
Yes, years ago with Julius Bizzard.
How long have you been on the property?
Since January of 1968.
But you did have a lease at one time?
Yes, one year with Julius Bizzard.
At that time the lease had run out and the new man was there and
you asked him for a written lease and he said if you needed one
to let him know and he would give you one?
Right.
And that was eight years ago?
Yes, right.
Councilman Brown?
Yes, your honor, may I ask if you had any problem getting your
gas connection with your new building?
Over at the original location where I moved from I had two
2,000 furnaces for a total of 4,000 BTU's. And I had a meter
with 375 kilometers, or whatever Public Service rates it at;
and when I purchased the property down here it had a 175 meter
which I had to sign for the rights to keep it for "X" amount
of years or I would lose the rights. As it is right now, I
have ten inches of insulation in the roof, five-eights dry
wall, and two furnaces totaling 2,000. Right now, like I say,
this is my first day in there and I can't tell you how it is
-6-
• ·' I {
'!'
'
I • •
0
f
-
•
•
• ,_
•
Pic kell: (cont.) going to be when it is zero. That was my concern on
trying to get one small meter to add to the one small one I had
to get 375,000 BTU's .
Brown: Thank you.
Mayor Taylor : Councilman Smith?
Smith: Did you at one time, if I remember right because I don't have it
in front of me, but did you request permission to take the other
meter from this location?
Pickell: Yes. I discussed it with Mayor Taylor, City Manager Andy McCown,
and the two Coun cilmen Dave Clayton and Vern Mann.
Smith: Is that still your desire?
Pickell: Preferably, yes.
Mayor Taylor: In our study session tonight we finally got confirmation from
Public Service Company that we have enough gas and you can have
a meter.
Pickell: That's what I understand, yes. I was told the City has no worry
on gas.
Mayor Taylor: Well, we didn't know that until we got written confirmation from
Public Service; and we find now that we do have enough that we
can allow you to have the meter that you come to see me about.
Pickell: Fine, thank you. I appreciate it.
Mayor Taylor: You are welcome.
Mann: I would like to go back to the lease a minute, and I would like
to ask the City Manager a question. Would it have made any
difference in the relocation change if he had had a lease
for a year or five years? How do you handle a case like that?
McCown: Well, when we purchased the property, in accordance with the
Council's policy, we would not consider any relocation expenses .
I assume, and probably John could help me out more here, that
if they had had a lease with the people they were leasing the
building from there would be some settlement between that party
and Mr. Pickell. I don't think it would be between the City
and Mr. Pickell.
Mann:
Criswell:
You mean ..• let me get it straight, John. Would that have been
a greater expense for Mr. Pickell than these other people if
they would have had the lease?
Well, let's state what I think would be a clear example and
work backwards. Let's assume that Phil and these other people
-7-
. ,
..
I • •
0
Criswell:
McCown:
Criswell:
Caughlan:
•
•
•
•
..
(cont.) had a two-year lease. I disagree with the City Manager
and you can cpeck with your City Attorney . If you wanted us out
of there before that lease terminated, you would have paid us to
get us out of there. Because merely buying the property from
the owner would not have given you the lease hold rights, and
we have discussed lease hold rights. We didn't Rave a lease,
though, so there is no question about us not having a lease.
I think from a very practical standpoint, and as you can see
Phil has been there now for eight years; and all the others had,
in the absence of the City purchasing it, a reasonable expecta-
tion of staying there for several more years whether they had
a written lease or not. Had there been a written lease and had
you wanted to get the property sooner than the written lease
would h ave run out, there would have had to been some sort of
settlement.
I would concur with that, but as far as the relocation expenses ..•
No, I agree. Let me cut this short, because I do want one
prob lem discussed bec ause it is a unique problem and it gets
me. So if I may, let me call the owner of C & L Auto Body
to tell you his problem with one particular aspect of this
thing. Would you come up and tell them about the paint thing.
I'm Charlie Caughlan, owner of C & L Auto Body, at 1864 West
Dartmouth in Englewood. We have been there for about four
months now. The biggest problem I had was with my paint bootH.
I don't know how many of you have been connected with the
Building Department or know anything about it, but the Code
is pretty strict on it. What we had before was a two-by-four
and sheet rock paint booth, which met all the Codes. I come
up and talked with the Building Department about trying to
tear it down and rebuild it, and they didn't actually say no
but they just started raising so much commotion about it that
I figured it wasn't worth the hastle. So then I just went
ahead and got a new spray booth. It is an Elvis spray booth
which is pretty much used all over the country. It is one of
the top three booths sold. It set me back, and you have some
of the figures before you there. It was quite a bit of money
to get this booth up. Even with this booth I run into some
problems. The electrical inspector came down and looked at
the lights one day. He was going to give an inspection on it.
He got real excited because he couldn 't see an Underwriter
• Laboratory sticker stuck on the side of the light. I had
some confirmation that said they were approved by Underwriters,
a nd he got me a little upset but after we both settled down we
got it all straightened out. So that is one of the main problems
that I have. Now in this building we have acquired, we have
almost had to build a new building. We had to put in a
plumbing system, a sand trap, we had to redo some of the wiring
in the building to bring some of it up to Code because it
wouldn't pass, and it has cost me quite a bit of money to
make this move.
-8-
'
• •
-
•
•
•
Caughlan: (cont.) And then the City is in the process of widening
Dartmouth, which hasn't helped business any either. So it
has really bee~ quite a struggle for me.
Mayor Taylor: Your estimated cost of moving is $1,635?
Caughlan: Yes.
Mayor Taylor: Is that over and above your paint booth?
Caughlan: Yes, that estimate from Weicker's was figuring for carpenter
and forklift to tear it apart and transport it with everything
else in the shop.
Mayor Taylor: You are talking about the paint booth?
Caughlan: Yes, it was figured in the transporting.
Mayor Taylor: So your total outlay was $1,635?
Caughlan: Yes, at that time from Weicker's.
Mayor Taylor: And how many months were you in the building over here that
you paid the City rent on?
Caughlan: I bought the business ..•
Mayor Taylor: No, I mean since we sent you the letter that you must move in
April. You moved when?
Caughlan: From this building, we moved in October.
Mayor Taylor: So you were there from .•. Andy informs me we sent the letter out
for vacation in April, wasn't it John?
Criswell: I think I figured five months.
Mayor Taylor: Five months. And how much rent were you paying?
Caughlan: $250 a month.
Mayor Taylor: To the City of Englewood?
Caughlan: Yes. And also, I talked to Larry Mason several times about
trying to acquire a lease also. He kept saying he would get
us a lease, but it was all talk and that was about it.
Mayor Taylor: In other words, he paid $1,450 to the City of Englewood
in five months for rent, if my mathematics is correct.
$1,250, I mean.
McCown: $1,250 .
Mayor Taylor: Any further questions?
-9-
.....
..
I • •
0
'
-
•
•
Mann:
Caughlan:
Mayor Taylor:
Caughlan:
•
•
Is it alright to assume that your total expenditures cost you
$10,647.17 to move?
Yes, sir. That is what I put out of my pocket and have receipts
for.
Wait a minute, I am looking at this.
That is just the Weicker receipt that we got to move the business
to another location. In fact, we had another agency come in
to look a while back to find out about moving the paint booth
alone and they give me an approximation. They didn't want to
give me a definite figure, but they were quoting me more like
$800 to $1,200 just to move the paint booth. So, if that be
the case, Weicker would be off even more. So, I don't know.
Clayton: On one of the items you have on here, and I am not condemning
at all but just trying to do some separation, but some are
actually improvements in your business. Had you done it either
way, they would be improvements or upgrading factor for your
business.
Caughlan: Yes. Not all of them, though. Like the plumbing, of course,
was something I already had in the old building. But the new
building, and I don't know how many of you gentlemen have tried
to acquire a building for a business, but it is very hard to
find a building suitable for a body shop that will still get
you through the Codes. The building we acquired is actually
larger than I wanted, but I couldn't find one actually the size
I wanted. So we were getting in a bind and only had a few
months left, so we took it. We had a lot of expenses there,
just like putting up the fence. The fence expense was actually
the expense that I put up just for the front part of the fence
which I did myself. The landlord did take care of the rest of
the fence. It was the City that said I did have to have a fence
to keep cars behind, that I couldn't just have them sitting in
the yard. So I was more or less forced into building a fence
whether I wanted it or not.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Smith?
Smith: You also approached Mr. Mason about a lease, you said?
Caughlan: • Yes, sir.
Smith: If you were aware that it would cost you such a large amount of
money should you ever have to move, why didn't you pressure him
to give you a lease?
Caughlan: At the time I wasn't aware that it would cost that much money.
If I had been aware, I probably would have done a lot of things
differently than I did. I might have just even went out of
business, but after you have had a business for a while and are
already into it you can't herdly quit. You have got to keep going.
-10-
'
I • •
0
Smith:
Caughlan:
Smith:
Caughlan:
Williams:
Caughlan :
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
•
•
•
-
How long have you been at this location?
The new location?
The old one.
The old one .•. a year ago last October. It would be a year and
three months.
Was the business there that you bought?
,_
Yes.
that
many
shop
It was a prior business that belonged to Richards. Before
it was Custom Automotive. There has been I don't know how
body shops in that building. I think it has been a body
for at least six or seven years.
Any other questions? Thank you. John ?
I am going to quit with just saying two things, if I may, and
then I am going to sit down. Number one, I didn't present
these figures here tonight with any expectation of the City
picking up the tab. I don't mean that at all. The figures
are merely presented so these individuals ••. sure, I'm sure
that in many instances they have had an improvement; but they
wouldn't have had to have the expenses at this point had it
not been for the City's acquisition.
Secondly, I understand the City policy. I understand that
probably if the City had its choice it wouldn't pay relocation
expenses to anybody. I understand it is the federal regulations
and state law that require the City to pay relocation expenses
to somebody. But I want you, if you will, whether the federal
government forces you to do it or not, how can this City Council
justify paying some citizens relocation allowances and not
paying others. I recognize you to say to me because we have
federal money; but so far as citizens are concerned, how can
you justify saying to Citizen A that if he has to move out of
his house and move to another house where there are no expenses
other than moving expenses, that you are going to pay those
moving expenses for them. But to a citizen and businessman
in Englewood who is going to have to go to some expenses that
would not be reimbursable in any case, how do you justify saying
to one citizen that you are going to pay the moving expenses and
• to another citizen saying you are not going to pay anything.
I understand and could understand if this City adopted the
policy of not paying anybody. That's fine. But I am standing
in front of you saying I don't think if you are going to let
the federal government call the tune on federal government
money .•• you have got to treat the citizen when you don't have
federal government money the same way.
We are not asking for nine or ten or twelve thousand dollars.
I do think these people are entitled to some aid. I do think
a reasonable solution would have been to have let them stay
. -
-11-
•
I • •
-
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
McCown:
Mayor Taylor:
•
•
•
-
(cont.) there without paying rent and let them use the rent
money for their moving expenses. And that is what I am asking
for now.
I recognize, and I am going to face it right in its eyes, that
if you authorize this you may be against your policy. But I
don't think your policy is a good one anyway if it means
discriminating against some c .itizens merely based on the
proposition of whether you get federal money or not.
John, I would like to ask you this. Maybe I am speaking too
much as a mayor and should have the Council ask questions,
but this popped into my mind. When you are talking about
where we reimbursed other people for relocation, who are
you talking about?
Well, it is my understanding that every piece of property
the City has bought where federal funds are involved •.•
I am talking about where federal funds aren't involved.
I am saying you haven't, as far as I know. And I am saying
how do you justify that. How do you justify paying the people
that you move out to create a park •••
Who did we do this for?
Well, all of your federal money ••• all the parks you acquired
through federal money you paid people moving expenses.
We had to because it is a federal law.
Exactly. You didn't have to. You didn't have to accept the
federal money.
That's true.
Ok. I'm not being facetious. But I am saying how do you
justify going to Citizen A •••
Well, I have an answer to that. That is the reason I asked
you this question. Now maybe not an answer but a thought.
I am thinking of some of the property that had houses on it
down at our river redevelopment where the golf course is.
It is my understanding, and I am certainly to be corrected
if I am wrong, but we have dealt directly with the owner of
that property.
We paid relocation on those.
But there was federal money involved. I can't think of any
case where we paid money where we weren't required to as you
say, or not get the money from the federal government.
-12-
'
••
,. .
I • •
.......
•
•
•
•
..
Criswell: I understand that, and from the City's point of view that might
make sense. But what is the differenc e between these three
c itizens and the citizens that you did pay relocation allowances
to?
Mayor Taylor: None. But our Charter states that we are not to pay relocation
money unless it is federally funded.
Criswell: I am not aware of that at all.
McCown: It is not a Charter provision, your honor. It is just merely
a policy that Council has followed for years, that if there are
no federal funds involved that the City will not pay the
relocation expenses. If there are federal funds, we will
pay them; and not because we approve of the federal policy
necessarily, but because the federal policy does say that
we must pay the relocation expenses. They include in their
grant to the City an amount of money that is sufficient to
pay those relocation expenses.
Criswell: Well, relocation expenses are not unique to the federal
government. Nor is it unique to governments. When J.M.
moved from New Jersey out here all of those people that were
moved were paid relocation expenses by J.M. And all I am
saying is, I recognize the budgetary problems of the City of
Englewood. And I recognize that to the City when you have
federal funds or not it makes a difference. But how, from a
citizens point of view, do you go to these citizens and say
you are not going to pay them a penny.
Mayor Taylor: Well, we haven't said that yet.
Criswell: I understand that. I don't mean that. But how do you justify
saying to these people that you aren't going to pay any moving
expenses, whereas at the same time we are acquiring a lot of
property through federal programs and every one of those people,
whether owners or tenants or whatever, are going to get their
moving expenses paid.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Clayton?
Clayton: Mr. Criswell, you made no mention of the A & B Transmission and
Gear Company. I am assuming that all you are asking for there
is the $1,350.
Criswell:
Clayton:
Criswell:
Yes.
They seem to have c onsiderably less expenses.
Well, I didn't call him for that reason. As a matter of fact,
I think Phil's had probably less remodeling expenses. The
difference, of course, with Phil is that he put all this
money into his own property. He had $40,000 more, but that
was because he was building a building. These other two
-13-
•
I • 0
0
f
-
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Smith:
Criswell:
Smith:
Criswell:
Smith:
•
Mayor Taylor:
• Mann:
Mayor Taylor:
•
0 , .
•
(cont.) individuals, A & B Transmission and C & L Auto Body,
is money that hop.efully , in the case of C & L will be able to
remove that paint shop, but if he can't that is down the tube;
as well as A & B Transmission remodeling another p erson's
property.
I didn't mean to put these figures down to say that you ought
to pay us this. I didn't mean that. I am merely reflecting
what the move has cost them. Now in many instances they are
going to have better facilities. There is no question about
that. But it wasn't their choice to pay it right now, but
they had to. And I guess, really, forgetting about the law
and the figures; I'm saying, and I say this very honestly and
sincerely, I just don't see how this City can adopt a dual
policy of buying some property and moving people out and paying
expenses for them, and buying other property and moving people
out but not paying their expenses. From the citizens point of
view, it makes no difference whether you have "Uncle Sugar"
behind you or not. I think it is a matter of fairness and
equality. You ought to adopt a uniform policy. And I am
sorry, I may be going against what this Council has said
before; but that is how I feel, and I am going to stand
by it.
I think Councilman Smith has something.
I think in light of what we are looking at, I happen to
disagree with the attorney that we ought to pay relocation
expenses because I think they are negotiable. But I do feel
that ••• where did A & B Transmission move to?
2405 West Hampden.
All of them stayed in Englewood?
A & B did not.
;-
Ok, I would like to, and I do disagree with relocation expenses
when the City is involved because I think we are a unique entity.
I want to make a motion to get this on the floor so we can more
intelligently discuss it.
I would like to move that we deny all relocation expenses, but
that we do allow for A & B Transmission to repay the rental
paid to the City in the amount of $1,550; that we reimburse
Phil's Auto Clinic for rent paid in the amount of $1,750; and
that we reimburse C & L Auto Body the amount of $1,250 for
rent paid.
You have heard the motion. Is there a second?
Yes, I'll second it.
Councilman Mann seconded it. Discussion? Question.
-14-
•.
I • •
0
f
-
•
James:
Smith:
James:
Mann:
James:
Brown:
James:
Clayton:
Jaaaes:
Taylor:
James:
Smith:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
• ,_
• •
Councilman Smith?
Yes.
Mann?
Yes.
Brown?
Yes.
Clayton?
Yes.
Mayor Taylor?
Yes.
Five ayes, no nays, your honor.
I want to comment on that motion. I want that motion very clear
that we denied all relocation expenses.
Hr. Criswell?
I am just going to rescue my pipe and say thank you very much.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-15-
•.
. . ,
• .
'
I • •
0
· . '
-
•
•
•
Englewood City Council Meeting
January 3 , 1977
•
0
•
, .
* * * * * * * * * *
Mayor Taylor: Mr. John Criswell?
,_
Criswell : Mr . Mayor, I am s uf feri n g from some sort of wild disease that
is going around. They say that one man 's salt is another man's
sugar, and the fac t that I am suffe ring this e v e ning means I
am not going to talk for very long.
I am appearing this evening at our request, again on behalf of
the three businesses whose business location has been acquired
by the City --Phil's Auto Clinic, C & L Auto Body, and A & B
Transmission.
Mayor Taylor : Would you identify yourself, please?
Criswell: John A. Criswell, Attorney at Law, 3780 South Broadway, Englewood,
Colorado. Knowing that I normally talk too long and that I can't
talk very we ll this evening, I have prepared a little outline that
I would like to present to Council if I may.
Very quic kly, a nd I would like the pe rmission of Council for each
of my clients to address Council, but very quickly let me say this.
The three businesses at roughly 25 East Girard, two of them were
in existence, well all three of them had been in existence for
som e period of time and either they or their predecessors have
occupied those premises for a number of years. None of them had
any written leases. They did originally, but the written leases
run out and since then they occupied it on a month-to-month
tenancy .
I have indicated in my little memo here that there could be some
legal c laim that, even though they were not on a written lease,
in view of the fact that they or their predecessors have occupied
the premises for a number of years, there could be some legal
claim made, in my view, that they are entitled to, quote -
compe nsation -unquote, just like a person who would occupy
the premises on a long-term lease. Furthermore, the statutes
of the State of Colorado make c lear, and this City makes clear
and the federal government makes clear, that were the property
that was acquired by the City acquired through federal funds
t here would have been no question but what there would have been
certain relocation expenses paid to them. Now I can understand
from the City's point of view that if you don't have federal
f unds it makes a difference . But from a landowner's point of
vie w, it makes no difference if the City acquires this property
through federal funds, through sales tax, through State funds,
or through City f unds. The problems presented to him are the
same. And, again, I think it is possible to make a legal claim,
-1-
•
I • •
0
• I f X
-
Criswell:
•
•
•
0 ..
•
(cont .) that if the City is going to pay some property own ers
for some tenants' relocation assistance i t should pay a ll. But
I am not here this venin to talk about legalities.
I hav attach d to my littl "poop-sheet " if you will, som e
estimates of what ha actually occurr ed with these three
individuals. I thin that you must understand that unlike
many busin ss s, and certainly unlike a residence, the nature
of this busin ss m ant ther w re v e r y few properties they
could ve into. And when they d id f ind a property they coul d
move into, because of t h na t ur e of their business there are
v e r y few st ru ct ures built to take this kind of business. You
hav e special d r a inage problems. You have special waste problems .
And, fo r example, if I can turn for just a moment to the last
attac hment relating to C & L Auto Body, he had in the premises
tha t h e was o c cupying a paint booth that met all the require-
ments of the City Code and so forth. The paint booth was not
very attractive to look at, but it served its purpose . When
he moved he could not take this thing apart and put it bac k
together again to meet City Code. And as a result, through
no fault of the City, we're not saying it is the City's fault
aside from the fact that the City acquired the property and
are going to tear the property down, it meant that he had to
spend almost $9,000 just to recreate a paint booth in accordance
with the Building Code.
I have tried to estimate expenses here, and I want each of these
individuals merely to stand up and explain to you the problems
they have had. In each case, these individuals had estimates
that said it would cost them roughly $1,500 to move their facilities.
In no case did they dig down in their jeans and do that. They did
it themselves. They rented some trucks, got help from friends, etc.
In each case they had to spend anywhere from a couple thousand
dollars up to nine thousand dollars to find other facilities. In
each case the facilities that they are renting now or are paying
for now, and Phil Pickell of Phil's Auto Body instead of leasing
went out and bought a piece of property, but in each case the
monthly payments they are having to pay, whether it be in the form
of rent or in the form of payments on a loan, it is anywhere from
double to three times what they were paying at the premises they
were at. And finally, since June they have paid the City in rentals
anywhere from $1,250 to, as I recall, $1,750, because some moved
sooner than others.
I guess what I am saying is, and I am pleading more out of the
sense of e quity and fairness than I am as an attorney, but if you
had some residents living on a piece of property that happened to
be a project where the federal government was going to reimburse
you, you would pay them all of their moving expenses. There is
no way that we could legitimately claim that this City is responsible
for any of our remodeling expenses because that happened. It is
unfortunate that they had to extend what they had to extend, but
it i s true .
-2-
'
I • •
0
Criswell:
•
•
•
•
0 I•
•
(cont.) I thought when I first appeared before Council, and I
apologize for not getting back to Council sooner but it was
apparently a br eakdown of communications between the staff and
I, but I thought at that time, and this was as I recall in July
or August or thereabouts, that perhaps the thing that might be
fair under the circumstances would be for my clients to agree
to get out of the property as quickly as possible so that the
City would have it and be able to demolish it and work with it,
which they have done. And in return instead of the City coming
up with any money, that in return the City might forgive the
rent that they would have otherwise charged for those few months
that they would be there, which was anywhere from five to six
or seven months, as I recall. Unfortunately, and I will take
the blame for it, the communications broke down and as a con-
sequence they continued to pay the City anywhere from $1,200
to $1,700.
It does seem to me though that, under these peculiar c ircum-
stances and under the doctrine of just plain old fairness,
forget about what the law is and what the law isn't, that
these individuals are entitled, it seems to me, to be considered
to have reimbursed to them at least what it would have typically
cost them to move based on the Weicker estimates . Or as an
alternative that the City could at least forgive and return
to them the rent that they paid the City over the past five
to seven months, which they have taken out of their pockets
and paid the City.
I would like to have, if I may Mr. Mayor, each of my clients
merely take two or three minutes to explain to you the sort of
problems we have run into.
Let me give you one example. And again, we mean no criticism
of the City; but let me give you an example of what this has
run into. Phil's Auto Clinic, for example, went out and bought
a piece of property. The property he bought was completely
properly zoned. There were no problems about that. It had
plumbing and was hooked up to the sewer, but the property he
bought happened to be a two-story building. I suspect, although
I didn't see it, that it was a little bit like my office. But
instead of remodeling that building, that two-story building,
like I did, he tore the thing down and put up a completely new
building. Now as I understand it, the building that was there,
the two-story building, was already being used for commercial
development. But because he put a new structure on the premises
rather than using the old structure, it was necessary, and even
though that old structure had been hooked up to the sewer line,
when he put the new building on there and hooked it up to the
sewer line he had to pay an additional $650 just for the sewer
tap fee. Now I am not talking about being critical of paying a
sewer tap fee. Apparently that is what the ordinances call for •
But it is an expense that the typical individual would not have
-3-
'
•
I • •
0
•
•
•
Criswell:
Mann:
Criswell:
•
-
(cont.) gone through. And it is not an expense that most
persons who are being moved out of a situation would have to
pay for.
I would, if I may, unl ess Council has questions o f me right
now, like to call upon each of my three clients to spend just
two or three minutes each summarizing some of the problems
they have run into.
On that particular case about the sewer tap fee, was he notified
of that before he tore the old building down and built the new one?
I don't know whether he was or not, Councilman Mann.
Mann: I would like to ask Mr. Pickell.
Criswell: I am not complaining about the sewer tap fee. I don't mean t o
have you misconstrue what I am saying. I don't mean to c riticise
the City for the tap fee . I am just saying that this is the type
of expenses that these people have been put to. And I am not
saying that it is an illegitimate expense. I am just saying it
is an expense that the typical individual who had been occupying
a home or a residence could have moved with no problems and would
have had no expenses other than the moving expenses.
Mayor Taylor: Any questions from Council? Alright, Mr. Criswell, would you
bring your clients up and have them identify themselves.
Pickell: Gentlemen of the Council, Phil Pickell, owner of Phil's Auto
Clinic, now located at 3741 South Kalamath, as of January 3rd.
Criswell: That is inside the City of Englewood?
Pickell: That 's right. Really, I don't know where to begin other than
talking with Mayor James Taylor, Councilman Clayton and Council-
man Vernon Mann on these particular problems. Number one, our
attorney John Criswell has already mentioned the sewer hook-up
as an expense. Reprinting of all papers, business forms , and
signs. Public Service for a gas tap. Phone Company to transfer
phones f rom one location to another. Moving myself with voluntary
help from some very good friends. That's about it, other than the
$40,000 building.
Mayor Taylor : I would like to ask you a qu estion, Mr . Pickell. Wh e n did you
buy the property that you are building on?
Pickell: Give or take a few months, about four years ago.
Mayor Taylor: And what were your plans for the property?
Pickell: Plans then wer e to build a building but not at this partic ular
time .
-4-
'
• ·.I
•' I !
'!'
"
I • •
0
-
•
•
•
•
-
Mayor Taylor: I see. What was your new address again?
Pickell: 3741 South Kalamath.
Mayor Taylor: Any other questions from Council to Mr. Pickell? Let me ask you
one then, Phil. If I understood Mr. Criswell, you would be willing
to assume your expenses if the rent was forgiven from the time
that we acquired the property until you moved?
Pickell: Speaking for myself, but we would meet with John Criswell, but I
would say yes.
Mayor Taylor: Ok. Any other questions from Council to Mr. Pickell? Don Smith?
Smith:
Pickell :
Smith:
Mr. Pickell, when did you plan on moving when you originally
bought the property that you are now located at?
Roughly two years from this year, say 1978 or 1979. My plans
then were to pay for the property and then to put the building
up. But the way it stands now I had to dig in the sock to pay
for the ground before I could find anybody to finance the
building, because they won't finance a building unless the
ground is free and clear.
Thank you.
Mayor Taylor: Any other questions? Councilman Mann?
Mann:
Pickell:
Mann:
Pickell:
Mann:
Pickell:
How much notice were you given by the City?
The same as everybody else. I would guess April or May .
In days •.• one month, two months, nine days, one hundred days?
On the moving of the location that I was in?
Yes, when you were to vacate the building.
The letter we received was roughly April or May to be out by
January 1.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Smith?
Smith: It is my understanding from your counsel, Mr. Criswell, that none
of you had long-term leases •
Pickell:
Smith:
Pickell:
No, sir.
May I ask at least personally, because I know you can't answer
for the rest of them, why, with the kind of investment you had
and knowing what it would cost to move, didn't you protect yourself
with a long-term lease?
Well, originally when I moved in there roughly nine years ago it
was owned by Julius Bizzard; and he in turn sold it to Larry Mason
-5-
'
.. • .. ,
....
I • •
0
•
•
• ;-
-
Pickell: (cont.) of Mason's Auto Parts in Littleton. The original owner
of A & B Transmission and myself approached Larry Mason for a
lease year-to-year; and at that particular time he said he would
come up with a lease, which he never did. He kept it on month-
to-month.
Smith: He just said that he would in time, but he never ended up doing it?
Pickell: Yes, he said if we needed a lease he would give us a lease; but
he preferred keeping it month-to-month.
Smith: And you never pushed it?
Pickell: No, I never pushed it.
Smith : Thank you.
Criswell: Did you have a written lease at one time?
Pickell: Yes, years ago with Julius Bizzard.
Criswell: How long have you been on the property?
Pickell: Since January of 1968.
Criswell: But you did have a lease at one time?
Pickell: Yes, one year with Julius Bizzard.
Criswell: At that time the lease had run out and the new man was there and
you asked him for a written lease and he said if you needed one
to let him know and he would give you one?
Pickell: Right.
Criswell : And that was eight years ago?
Pickell: Yes, right.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Brown?
Brown: Yes, your honor, may I ask if you had any problem getting your
gas connection with your new building?
Pickell: Over at the original location where I moved from I had two
2,000 f urnaces for a total of 4,000 BTU's. And I had a meter
with 375 kilometers, or whatever Public Service rates it at;
and when I purchased the property down here it had a 175 meter
which I had to sign for the rights to keep it for "X" amount
of years or I would lose the rights. As it is right now, I
have ten inches of insulation in the roof, five-eights dry
wall, and two furnaces totaling 2,000. Right now, like I say,
this is my first day in there and I can't tell you how it is
-6-
I • •
0
-
•
•
•
,. . •
-
Pickell: (cont.) going to be when it is zero. That was my concern on
trying to get one small meter to add to the one small one I had
to get 375,000 BTU's.
Brown: Thank you.
Mayor Taylor: Councilman Smith?
Smith: Did you at one time, if I remember right because I don't have it
in front of me, but did you request permission to take the other
meter from this location?
Pickell: Yes. I discussed it with Mayor Taylor, City Manager Andy McCown,
and the two Councilmen Dave Clayton and Vern Mann.
Smith: Is that still your desire?
Pickell: Preferably, yes.
Mayor Taylor: In our study session tonight we finally got confirmation from
Public Service Company that we have enough gas and you can have
a meter.
Pickell: That's what I understand, yes. I was told the City has no worry
on gas.
Mayor Taylor: Well, we didn't know that until we got written confirmation from
Public Service; and we find now that we do have enough that we
can allow you to have the meter that you come to see me about.
Pickell: Fine, thank you. I appreciate it.
Mayor Taylor: You are welcome.
Mann: I would like to go back to the lease a minute, and I would like
to ask the City Manager a question. Would it have made any
difference in the relocation change if he had had a lease
for a year or five years? How do you handle a case like that?
McCown:
Mann:
Criswell:
Well, when we purchased the property, in accordance with the
Council's policy, we would not consider any relocation expenses.
I assume, and probably John could help me out more here, that
if they had had a lease with the people they were leasing the
building from there would be some settlement between that party
and Mr. Pickell. I don't think it would be between the City
and Mr. Pickell.
You mean •.• let me get it straight, John. Would that have been
a greater expense for Mr. Pickell than these other peop!e if
they would have had the lease?
Well, let's state what I think would be a clear example and
work backwards. Let's assume that Phil and these other people
-7-
•• . ,
I • •
0
· .
Criswell:
McCown:
Criswell:
Caughlan:
•
•
•
•
0 -
(cont.) had a two-year lease. I disagr e e with the City Manager
and you can check with your City Attorney. If you wanted us out
of there before that lease terminated, you would have paid u s t o
ge t us out of the re. Because merely buying the property from
the owner would not have given you the lease hold rights, and
we have discussed lease hold rights. We didn't have a lease,
though, so there is no question about us not having a lease.
I think from a very prac tical standpoint, and as you can see
Phil has been there now for eight years; and all the others had,
in the absence of the City purchasing it, a reasonable expecta-
tion of staying there for several more years whether they had
a written lease or not. Had there been a written lease and had
you wanted to get the property sooner than the written lease
would have run out, there would have had to been some sort of
settlement.
I would concur with that, but as far as the relocation expenses ...
No, I agree. Let me cut this short, because I do want one
problem discussed because it is a unique problem and it gets
me. So if I may, let me call the owner of C & L Auto Body
to tell you his problem with one particular aspect of this
thing. Would you come up and tell them about the paint thing.
I'm Charlie Caughlan, owner of C & L Auto Body, at 1864 West
Dartmouth in Englewood. We have been there for about four
months now. The biggest problem I had was with my paint booth.
I don't know how many of you have been connected with the
Building Department or know anything about it, but the Code
is pretty strict on it. What we had before was a two-by-four
a nd sheet rock paint booth, which met all the Codes. 1 come
up and talked with the Building Department about trying to
tear it down and rebuild it, and they didn't actually say no
but they just started raising so much commotion about it that
I figured it wasn't worth the hastle. So then I just went
ahead and got a new spray booth. It is an Elvis spray booth
which is pretty much used all over the country. It is one of
the top three booths sold. It set me back, and you have some
of the figures before you there. It was quite a bit of money
to get this booth up. Even with this booth I run into some
problems. The electrical inspector came down and looked at
the lights one day. He was going to give an inspection on it.
He got real excited because he couldn't see an Underwriter
Laboratory sticker stuck on the side of the light. I had
some confirmation that said they were approved by Underwriters,
and he got me a little upset but after we both settled down we
got it all straightened out. So that is one of the main problems
that I have. Now in this building we have acquired, we have
a lmost had to build a new building. We had to put in a
plumbing system, a sand trap, we had to redo some of the wiring
in the building to bring some of it up to Code because it
wouldn't pass, and it has cost me quite a bit of money to
make this move.
-8-
'
••
'
I • •
·' \ !
I . I
'!
•
•
•
•
..
Caughlan: (cont.) And then the City is in the process of widening
Dartmouth, which hasn 't helped business any either. So it
has really been quite a struggle for me.
Mayor Taylor : Your estimated cost of moving is $1,635?
Cau g hlan : Yes.
Mayor Taylor : Is that over and above your paint booth?
Caughlan: Yes, that estimate from Weicker's was figuring for c arpent er
and forklift to tear it a part and transport it with every thing
else in the sho p.
Mayor Taylor: You are talking about the paint booth?
Caughlan: Yes, it was figured in the transporting.
Mayor Taylor : So your total outlay was $1,635?
Caughlan : Yes, at that time from Weicker's.
Mayo r Taylor : And how many months were you in the building over he r e that
you paid the City rent on?
Caughlan: I bought the business .•.
Mayor Taylor: No, I mean since we sent you the letter that you must move in
April. You moved when?
Caughlan: From this building, we moved in October.
Mayor Taylor: So you were there from ..• Andy informs me we sent the letter out
for va c ation in April, wasn't it John?
Criswell: I think I figured five months.
Mayor Taylor : Five months. And how much rent were you paying?
Caug hlan: $250 a month.
Mayor Taylor: To the City of Englewood?
Caughlan: Yes . And also , I talked t o Larry Mason several times about
trying to ac quire a lease also. He kept saying he would get
us a lease, but it was all talk and that was about it.
Mayor Taylor : In other words, he paid $1 ,450 to the City of Englewood
in five months for rent , if my mathematics is correct.
$1,250 , I mean .
McCown: $1,250 .
Mayor Taylor: Any f urther questions ?
-9-
'
I • •
0
. ,
-
Mann:
Caughlan:
Mayor Taylor:
Caughlan:
Clayton:
Caughlan:
Mayor Taylor:
Smith:
Caughlan:
• Smith:
Caughlan:
•
•
•
0
•
Is it alright to assume that your total expenditures cost you
$10,647.17 to move?
Yes, sir. That is what I put out of my pocket and have receipts
for.
Wait a minute, I am looking at this.
That is just the Weicker recei pt that we got to move the business
to another location. In fact, we had another agency come in
to look a while back to find out about moving the paint booth
alone and they give me an approximation. They didn't want to
give me a definite figure, but they were quoting me more like
$800 to $1,200 just to move the paint booth. So, if that be
the case, Weicker would be off even more. So, I don't know.
On one of the items you have on here, and I am not condemning
at all but just trying to do some separation, but some are
actually improvements in your business. Had you done it either
way, they would be improvements or upgrading factor for your
business.
Yes. Not all of them, though. Like the plumbing, of course,
was something I already had in the old building. But the new
building, and I don't know how many of you gentlemen have tried
to acquire a building for a business, but it is very hard to
find a building suitable for a body shop that will still get
you through the Codes. The building we acquired is actually
larger than I wanted, but I co~ldn 't find one actually the size
I wanted. So we were getting in a bind and only had a few
months left, so we took it. We had a lot of expenses there,
just like putting up the fence. The fence expense was actually
the expense that I put up just for the front part of the fence
which I did myself. The landlord did take care of the rest of
the fence. It was the City that said I did have to have a fence
to keep cars behind, that I couldn't just have them sitting in
the yard. So I was more or less forced into building a fence
whether I wanted it or not.
Councilman Smith?
You also approached Mr. Mason about a lease, you said?
Yes, sir •
If you were aware that it would cost you such a large amount of
money should you ever have to move, why didn't you pressure him
to give you a lease?
At the time I wasn't aware that it would cost that much money.
If I had been aware, I probably would have done a lot of things
differently than I did. I might have just even went out of
business, but after you have had a business for a while and are
already into it you can't hardly quit. You have got to keep going.
-10-
'
•
I • •
0
. , f
Man n :
Caughlan:
Mayor Taylor:
Caughlan:
Clayton:
Caughlan:
Mayor Taylor:
Smith:
Caughlan:
Smith:
Caughlan:
•
•
•
0
I s it alright to assume that yo ur total expenditures c o s t yo u
$10,647.17 to move?
Ye s, sir. That is what I put out of my po c k e t and have r e ceipts
for.
Wait a minute, I am looking at this.
That is just the Weicker rec eipt that we got to move the business
to another location. In fact, we had another a gency come in
to look a while back to find out about moving the paint booth
alone and they give me an approximation. They didn't want to
give me a definite figure, but they were quoting me more like
$800 to $1,200 just to move the paint booth. So, if that be
the case, Weicker would be off even more. So, I don't know.
On one of the items you have on here, and I am not condemning
at all but just trying to do some separation, but some are
actually improvements in your business. Had you done it either
way, they would be improvements or upgrading factor for your
business.
Yes. Not all of them, though. Like the plumbing, of course,
was something I already had in the old building. But the new
building, and I don't know how many of you gentlemen have tried
to acquire a building for a business, but it is very hard to
find a building suitable for a body shop that will still get
you through the Codes. The building we acquired is actually
larger than I wanted, but I couldn't find one actually the size
I wanted. So we were getting in a bind and only had a few
months left, so we took it. We had a lot of expenses there,
just like putting up the fence. The fence expense was actually
the expense that I put up just for the front part of the fence
which I did myself. The landlord did take care of the rest of
the fence . It was the City that said I did have to have a fence
to keep cars behind, that I couldn't just have them sitting in
the yard. So I was more or less forced into building a fence
whether I wanted it or not.
Councilman Smith?
You also approached Mr. Mason about a lease, you said?
Yes, sir.
If you were aware that it would cost you such a large amount of
money should you ever have to move, why didn't you pressure him
to give you a lease?
At the time I wasn't aware that it would cost that much money.
If I had been aware, I probably would have done a lot of things
differently than I did. I might have just even went out of
business, but after you have had a business for a while and are
already into it you can't hardly quit. You have got to keep going.
-lQ-
'
I • •
0
Smith:
Caughlan:
Smith:
Caughlan:
Williams:
Caughlan:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
•
•
•
0 ..
How long have you been at this location?
The new location?
The old one.
The old one ... a year ago last October. It would be a year and
three months.
Was the business there that you bought?
Yes.
that
many
shop
It was a prior business that belonged to Richards. Before
it was Custom Automotive. There has been I don't know how
body shops in that building. I think it has been a body
for at least six or seven years.
Any other questions? Thank you. John?
I am going to quit with just saying two things, if I may, and
then I am going to sit down. Number one, I didn't present
these figures here tonight with any expectation of the City
picking up the tab. I don't mean that at all. The figures
are merely presented so these individuals .•• sure, I'm sure
that in many instances they have had an improvement; but they
wouldn't have had to have the expenses at this point had it
not been for the City's acquisition.
Secondly, I understand the City policy. I understand that
probably if the City had its choice it wouldn't pay relocation
expenses to anybody. I understand it is the federal regulations
and state law that require the City to pay relocation expenses
to somebody. But I want you, if you will, whether the federal
government forces you to do it or not, how can this City Council
justify paying some citizens relocation allowances and not
paying others. I recognize you to say to me because we have
federal money; but so far as citizens are concerned, how can
you justify saying to Citizen A that if he has to move out of
his house and move to another house where there are no expenses
other than moving expenses, that you are going to pay those
moving expenses for them. But to a citizen and businessman
in Englewood who is going to have to go to some expenses that
would not be reimbursable in any case, how do you justify saying
to one citizen that you are going to pay the moving expenses and
to another citizen saying you are not going to pay anything.
I understand and could understand if this City adopted the
policy of not paying anybody. That's fine. But I am standing
in front of you saying I don't think if you are going to let
the federal government call the tune on federal government
money .•• you have got to treat the citizen when you don't have
federal government money the same way.
We are not asking for nine or ten or twelve thousand dollars.
I do think these people are entitled to some aid. I do think
a reasonable solution would have been to have let them stay
.
~
-11-
'
'
I • •
0
. , f
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Hayor Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
•
Mc Cown:
Mayor Taylor:
•
•
•
0 ,. -
(cont.) there without paying rent and let them use the r e nt
money for their moving expenses. And that is what I am asking
for now.
I recognize, and I am going to f ace it right in its eyes, that
if you authorize this you may be against your policy. But I
don't think your policy is a good one anyway if it means
discriminating against some citizens merely based on the
proposition of whether you get federal money or not.
John, I would like to ask you this. Maybe I am speaking too
much as a mayor and should have the Council ask quest ions,
but this popped into my mind. When you are talking about
where we reimbursed other people for relocation, who are
you talking about?
Well, it is my underst anding that every piece of property
the City has bought where federal funds are involved ..•
I am talking about where federal funds aren't involved.
I am saying you haven't, as far as I know. And I am saying
how do you justify that. How do you justify paying the people
t hat you move out to create a park ..•
Who did we do this for?
Well, all of your federal money .•• all the parks you acqu i red
through federal money you paid people moving expenses .
We had to because it is a federal law.
Exactly . You didn't have to. You didn't ha v e to a ccept th
federal money.
That's true.
Ok. I'm not being facetious. But I am saying how do you
justify going to Citizen A ••.
Well, I have an answer to that. That is the reason I asked
you this qu estion . Now maybe not an answer but a thoug ht.
I am thinking of some of the property that had houses o n i t
down at our river redevelopment where the golf c ours e is .
It is my understanding, and I am certainly to be correc t e d
if I am wrong, but we have dealt directly with the owner of
that property.
We paid relocation on those.
But there was federal money involved. I can't think of any
case where 1~e paid money where we weren't required to as you
say, or not get the money from the federal government.
-12-
'
•• -
I • •
0
• 1
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell :
McCown:
Criswell:
Mayo r Taylor:
Criswell:
Mayo r Tay lor:
Clayton:
• Criswell:
Clayton:
Criswell:
•
•
•
..
I understand that, and from the City's point of view that might
make sense. But what is the difference between these three
citizens and the citizens that you did pay relocation allowances
to?
None. But our Charter states that we are not to pay relocation
money unless it is federally funded.
I am not aware of that at all.
It is not a Charter provision, your honor. It is just merely
a policy that Council has followed for years, that if there are
no federal funds involved that the City will not pay the
relocation expenses. If there are federal funds, we will
pay them; and not because we approve of the federal policy
necessarily, but because the federal policy does say that
we must pay the relocation expenses. They include in their
grant to the City an amount of money that is sufficient to
pay those relocation expenses.
Well, relocation expenses are not unique to the federal
government. Nor is it unique to governments. When J.M.
moved from New Jersey out here all of those people that were
moved were paid relocation expenses by J.M. And all I am
saying is, I recognize the budgetary problems of the City of
Englewood. And I recognize that to the City when you have
federal funds or not it makes a difference. But how, from a
citizens point of view, do you go to these citizens and say
you are not going to pay them a penny.
Well, we haven't said that yet.
I understand that. I don't mean that. But how do you justify
saying to these people that you aren't going to pay any moving
expenses , whereas at the same time we are acquiring a lot of
property through federal programs and every one of those people,
wh ether owners or tenants or whatever, are going to get their
moving expenses paid.
Councilman Clayton?
Mr. Criswell, you made no mention of the A & B Transmission and
Gear Company. I am assuming that all you are asking fo r there
is the $1,350.
Yes .
They seem to have considerably less expenses .
Well, I didn't call him for that reason. As a matter of fact,
I think Phil's had probably less remodeling expenses. The
difference, of course, with Phil is that he put all this
money into his own property. He had $40,000 more, but that
was because he was building a building. These other two
-13-
•
I • •
0
·' \ !
I
~
-
Criswell:
Mayor Taylor:
Smith:
Criswell:
Smith:
Criswell:
Smith:
Mayor Taylor:
• Mann:
Mayor Taylor:
•
•
0 -
(cont.) individuals, A & B Transmission and C & L Auto Body,
is money that hopefully, in the case of C & L will be able to
remove that paint shop, but if he can't that is down the tube;
as well as A & B Transmission remodeling another person's
property.
I didn't mean to put these figures down to say that you ought
to pay us this. I didn't mean that. I am merely reflecting
what the move has cost them. Now in many instances they are
going to have better facilities. There is no question about
that. But it wasn't their choice to pay it right now, but
they had to. And I guess, really, forgetting about the law
and the figures; I'm saying, and I say this very honestly and
sincerely, I just don't see how this City can adopt a dual
policy of buying some property and moving people out and paying
expenses for them, and buying other property and moving people
out but not paying their expenses. From the citizens point of
view, it makes no difference whether you have "Uncle Sugar"
behind you or not. I think it is a matter of fairness and
equality. You ought to adopt a uniform policy . And I am
sorry, I may be going against what this Council has said
before; but that is how I feel, and I am going to stand
by it.
I think Co uncilman Smith has something.
I think in light of what we are looking at, I happen to
disagree with the attorney that we ought to pay relocation
expenses because I think they are negotiable. But I do feel
that ••• where did A & B Transmission move to?
2405 West Hampden .
All of them stayed in Englewood?
A & B did not.
Ok, I would like to, and I do disagree with relocation expenses
when the City is involved because I think we are a unique entity .
I want to make a motion to get this on the floor so we can more
intelligently discuss it.
I would like to move that we deny all relocation expenses, but
that we do allow for A & B Transmission to repay the rental
paid to the City in the amount of $1,550; that we reimburse
Phil's Auto Clinic for rent paid in the amount of $1,750; and
that we reimburse C & L Auto Body the amount of $1,250 for
rent paid.
You have heard the motion. Is there a second?
Yes, I'll second it.
Councilman Mann seconded it. Discussion? Question.
. -
-14-
'
•
I • •
0
. I
•
•
James:
Smith:
James:
Mann:
James:
Brown:
James:
Clayton:
James:
Taylor:
James:
Smith:
Mayor Taylor:
Criswell:
•
•
·. •
Councilman Smith?
Yes.
Mann?
Yes.
Brown?
Yes.
Clayton?
Yes.
Mayor Taylor?
Yes.
Five ayes, no nays, your honor.
I want to comment on that motion. I want that motion very clear
that we denied all relocation expenses.
Mr. Criswell?
I am just going to rescue my pipe and say thank you very much.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-15-
'
'
I • •
0
'
•
•
•
0 -
AGENDA FOR
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
JANUARY 3, 1977
,._
t•
7:30 P .M. Call to order, invocation by Dr. Helen Walker, Esoteric
Truth Center , 130 East Girard Avenue, pledge of allegiance
by Boy Scout Troop #154, and roll call.
1. Min utes.
Minutes of the regular meeting of December 20,
1976. (Copies enclosed.)
2. Pre-Scheduled Visitors.
~~~~~+J ~Dil.S (a)
Made.
Presentation of awards to the winners of the
"Improve Our Community" essay contest sponsored
by the Englewood Centennial Bi-Centennial Com-mittee. (Copies enclosed.)
~.\DC<th .... c:.yf'l~) Mr. Marten Lathrop, 3259 South Clarkson Street ,
0 ..!<> 0 -,...-\--~J.will be present to receive a proclamation pro -'~ ~ ~ claiming January 13, 1977 as Marten Lathrop Day. o (Copies El._nclos.Jd.) J. J.. ~.t.h.~.J ~.t-v~t~ttT;s -A'k .1!> ~1 1 6~-~·c-o P~; 1-> ~~70-o e. J., Lr~2..s;o
(c) Mr. John Criswell, attorney representing Phil's
Auto Clinic, 25 East Girard Avenue, will be pre-
s ent to discuss relocation needs of his client. (Copies enclosed.)
3 . Communications -No Action Recommended.
(a) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of November 16, 1976. (Copies enclosed.)
4. Communications -Action Recommended.
(a) Minutes of the Board of Career Service Commission-
ers meeting of December 16, 1976 with a recommenda-
tion concerning the junior accountant position.
(Minutes and Resolution enclosed .)
(b) Memorandum from the City Manager concerning aid
to other agencies. (Copies enclosed.) I . •
'
-
•
• (
•
t• -
Page 2
January 3 , 1977 Agenda
5. City Attorney.
Bills for Or dinances.
~ (a) Bill cre ating a new classification for "Taverns" /~~ ~ for the purpose of establ ishing the occupational /~ /~if tax. (Copies enclosed.)
Bill increasing sewer construction inspection
services. (Copies enclosed. )
Resolutions.
Resolution concerning the purchase of property
at 105 and 109 East Girard Avenue. (Copies enclosed.)
Other Matters.
Jd~,Y.-:/ ~ (d)
o/e' ~~ ~~-11JJf
(e)
Report from the City Attorney concerning the special
assessment hardship cases. (Copies enclosed.)
Report from the City Attorney concerning the law
suit on revocation of liquor license for Back Door
Liquor , 5450 South Broadway.
•
(f) Report from the City Attorney concerning the law
suit on revocation of liquor license for Back Door
Liquor , 5450 South Broadway.
(g) Report from the City Attorney concerning approval
of stipulation between the City of Englewood and
Carl Ryberg, 3228 Routh Clarkson. (C?pies enclosed.)
(h) Attorney's Choice.1•• k' r ":'. ~ /
A"z./'t'f)$ "j(~je ;bllllf\~ I a...sk 1"{)/Z-W.OS ,A,f'f
6. City Manager.
(a) Memorandum from the Director of Finance to the
City Manager concerning grant denial on the Public
Works Title I construction application. (Copies
enclosed.) P......L~ ---r -~ ~ .. -?r;;,fi"'.,...-?C~-
(b) Memorandum from the Director of Finance to the City
Manager concerning Public Works Title II grant
receipts . (Cop ies enclosed.)
(c) Consideration of traffic island at Elati Street and Floyd Avenue.
(d) Consideration of the recommendation from the Parks
and Recreation Commission for naming of the Se nior
Center . (Copies enclosed.)
(e) Manager's Choice.
'
,_
'
I . •
0
·' I I
I
'r
•
•
·. •
Page 3
January 3, 1977 Agenda
7. Visitors.
8. Genera l Discussion.
(a) Mayor's Choice.
(b) Council Member's Choice .
9. Adjournment .
City Manager
•
• I . •
0
'
. , •
-
•
•
•
REGULAR MEETING:
•
0 -
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLE WOOD , COLORADO
Decem ber 20 , 1976
The City Council of the City o f Englewood, Arapahoe Co unty, Colorado ,
met in regular session on December 20 , 1976 at 7 :30 p .m.
Mayor Taylor, presiding , called the meeting to order.
The invoc ation was given by Reverend Fred Hahn , Immanuel Lutheran
Church , 3695 South Acoma . The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Cub Scout Pack
#13 7 , Webel ows Den Hl .
Mayor Taylor asked f or r oll call. Upon the call o f the r oll , the
foll owing were present:
Council Members Williams, Sovern, Smith , Brown , Mann, Clayton , Taylo r .
Absent : None .
The May o r declared the moti on carried .
Also present were: City Manager McCown
Asst . City Mana ger Nollenberger
City Atto rney Berardini
Dir . o f Finance/City Clerk James
Deputy City Clerk Varner
******
CO UNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CI TY
COUNCIL MEETING OF DECEMBER 7, 1976 . Councilman Se vern seconded the motion .
Upon a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as f ollows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams, So vern, Smith, Brown, Clayton , Taylo r .
Nays: None .
Abstain: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
Ed ward E . Co rdova and Paulette M. Co rdova, 3382 South Flo rence Court ,
Denver , appeared and requested a transfer of the retail liquor store lic ense
f o r Englewood Liquors, 3434 South Broadway , from Golda B. Marshall , James L .
Girardot and Mary Lou Girardot due to the change of ownership . Mr . Co rdova
stated that he and Mrs. Cordova now own and will be operating Englewood Liquo rs.
'
·• •• ' r
'!
I • •
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 2
•
0
•
,_
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED TO TRANSFER THE RETAIL LIQUOR STORE LICENSE OF
ENGLEWOOD LIQUORS , 3434 SOUTH BROADWAY , FROM GOLDA B. MARSHALL , JAMES L. GIRARDOT
AND MARY LOU GIRARDOT 'IO EDWARD E. CORDO VA AND PAULETTE M. CORDOVA . Councilman
Williams seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vo te resulted as follows:
Ayes: Cou ncil Membe r s Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Mann ,
Clayton , Taylo r .
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
"Co mmunicatio ns -No Acti on Rec ommended " on the agenda were received:
a . Minutes o f the Housing Authority meeting of October 26 , 1976 .
b . Minutes of the Police Pension Board meeting o f December 8 ,
1976 .
c . Minutes of the Library Board meeting of December 14 , 1976.
d . Financial Rep ort f o r the month of November 1976 .
e . Memorandum from the Director of Personnel t o the City
Manager concerning his attendance at the Annual Conference
of the I nternational Personnel Management Association in
Washington , D.C. from November 28 t o Dec ember 2 , 1976 .
Council discussed a motion in the minutes o f the Housing Authority
meeting of October 26 which established the pri o rities for residency in the
elderly housing project .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED THAT CITY COUNCIL REC OMMEND 'IO THE HOUSING
AUTHORITY THAT THEY RECONSIDER THESE PRIORITIES BY CONSIDERING TO ADD PREVIOUS
LONG -TIME RESIDENTS OF ENGLEWOOD TO THE FIRST PRIORITY AND 'IO DELETE PERSONS
ONLY WORKING IN ENGLEWOOD FROM THE FIRST PRIORITY . Co uncilman Clayton seconded
the moti o n . Upon a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as f ollows:
Ayes : Council Members Se vern, Smith , Brown, Clayton , Taylor.
Nays : Council Members Williams, Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
Assistant City Manager Nollenberger presented a memorandum from the
Director of Utilities concerning an en croachment agreement for Plaza de Medic o
located in the 3500 block of South Washington. This encroachment would cover
..
I • •
•
•
•
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 3
a distance o f f orty-fow· feet on the sanitary se.,er main located in the
existing vacated alley .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO APPROVE THIS ENC ROACHMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND PLAZA DE MEDICO . Councilman Severn
seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follo.,s :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn, Smith , Bro~, Mann, Cleyton , Teylo r.
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
Assistant City Manager Nollenberger presented a memorandum from
the Di recto r of Utilities concerning a gas service easement for the gas
distribution system at the Bi-City Treatment Plant . This easement calls
for Public Service Company to extend the distribution system at their cost
in lieu of installing it ourselves and installing one master gas meter .
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THIS GAS
SER VICE EASEMENT FOR THE GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AT THE BI -CITY TREATMENT
PLANT . Councilman Severn seconded the motion . Upon a call of the r oll ,
the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Nembers Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Mann ,
Cleyton , Teylor .
Nays : None .
The May or declared the motion carried .
******
RESOLUTION NO . 64 , SERIES OF 1976
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SALARIES FOR THE CITY MANAGER, CITY ATTORNEY
AND MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE .
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO . 64, SERIES OF 1976 ,
INCLUDING $27 ,560/YEAR FOR THE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE AND $110/DAY FOR THE
ASSOCIATE JUDGE; AND TO CORRECT THE RESOLUTION TO READ "1977 APPROPRIATION"
AND "CALENDAR YEAR 1977 " RATHER THAN 1976 . Councilman Williams seconded
the motion .
Discussion follo.,ed concerning salary increases and inflation.
Upon a call of the r oll , t he vo te resulted as f ollo.,s:
Taylor. Ayes: Council Members Williams, Severn, Smith, Bro~, Clayton ,
"' .
'
I • •
0
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 4
Nays: Council Member Mann .
•
0 -
The May o r declared the motion carried .
******
,.
City Attorney Berardini reported on a law suit filed against the
City of Englewood , et al , by Lester H. Bolejack concerning property held as
evidence by the Englewood Police Department since 1974 . This case involves
property from a watch repair shop , and the proper owners are trying to be
determined .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the Director of
Public Works suggesting the following meeting schedule for consideratio n of
Littl e Dry Creek development alternatives:
January 6 -residential area north of Floyd Avenue and
west of Bannock
January 10 -School Board
J anuary 13 -residential area east of Bannock and west
of Logan
January 20 -Mayor 's Coffee
January 27 -residential area between Logan and Clarks on
February 3 -Chamber of Commerce and business people ,
lessee s and lessors
February 10 & 17 -open meetings for other interested
citizens in the City of Englewood outside
of the outlined area
City Manager McCown noted that these meetings will begin at 7:30p .m.
COUN CI LMAN SOVERN MOVED TO ADOPT THIS MEETING SCHEDULE AND TO HAVE
A STUDY SESS ION ON JANUARY 3 , 1977 TO PLAN THESE MEETINGS . Councilman Smith
seconded the mo t ion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith, Brown , Mann ,
Clayton , Taylor .
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
"
• •
0
. ,
-
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 5
•
0 -,.
City Manager McCown presented and reviewed a memorandum from the
Director of Finance and Assistant City Manager concerning a budget status
report for 1976 .
RESOLUTION NO . 65 , SERIES OF 1976
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1976 BUDGET IN THE GENERAL FUND , SEWER FUHD , AND
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND CONSTRUCTION SUB -i"UND .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO . 65 , SERIES OF 1976 .
Councilman Brown seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Sovern , Smith , Brown , Mann,
Clayton , Taylor.
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the Assistant City
Manager concerning police and fire pension legislation .
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED TO POSTPONE THIS ITEM FOR FURTHER STUDY .
Councilman Williams seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll, the vote
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Sovern , Smith, Br own, Mann,
Clayton , Taylor .
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum concerning vacancies on
the boards and commissions in the City early in 1977 .
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED TO HAVE A STUDY SESSION ON JANUARY 24, 1977
AT 6:00 P .M. TO INTERVIEW AND CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD AND
COMMISSION VACANCIES . Councilman Sovern seconded the motion . Upon a
call of the roll, the vote resulted as f ollows:
Ayes : Council ~!embers Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown, Mann ,
Clayton, Taylor .
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
-
,_
• I
·' I !
'!
'
I • •
0
•
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 6
•
0
•
, .
City Manager McCown presented a mem orandum from the Director o f
Public Works c oncerning a s u ppl emental agreement with the State Department
of Highways c overing maintenance on signals and striping along state highways
within the city l imits of Eng l ewood.
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED TO APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO
SIGN THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS .
Councilman Mann seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote
resulted as f ollows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith, Brown, Mann,
Clayton , Taylor .
Nays: None .
The May or declared the motion carried .
******
Gordon Hays appeared representing Winslow Construction Company,
3002 South Huron, concerning their lease with the City of Englewood .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO REFER THIS MATI'ER TO THE STAFF AND FOR
CITY COUNCIL TO FURTHER NEGOTIATE WITH WINSLOW CONSTRUCTION COMPANY . Co uncil-
man Sovern seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted
as foll ows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Sovern , Smith, Brown , Mann,
Clayto n , Taylo r .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
******
May o r Taylor stated that he has received a distinguished service
a ward fr om the United Nations Ass ociation to be presented to Marten Lathrup
f or being in charge of Englewood 's United Nations Day for the past t wo years .
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED THAT THE DISTINGU ISHED SER VI CE AWARD FROM
THE UNITED NATIONS ASSOCIATION AND A PROCLAMATION FROM CITY COUNCIL BE PRESENTED
TO ~1ARTEN LATHRUP AT THE MAYOR 'S COFFEE ON JANUARY 13 , 1917 . Councilman Brown sec onded the motion •
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED TO AMEND THIS MOTION BY ALSO DECLARING
JANUAR Y 13 , 1977 AS MARTEN LATHRUP DAY IN Tllli CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . Councilman
Smith seco nded the motion . Up on a call of the roll , the vote resulted as fol lows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Sovern , Sm ith, Brown, Mann , Clayt on , Tayl or .
,._
'
I • •
0
.. ,
-
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 7
Nays: None .
•
• •
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
, .
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED TO AMEND THE ORIGIN AL MOTION BY MOVING THE
MAYOR'S COFFEE ON JANUARY 13, 1977 FROM 9:00A .M. TO 7:30P.M. Councilman
Clayton seconded the motion. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams, Severn , Smith , Brown , Mann,
Clayton, Taylor.
Nays: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Upon a call of the roll, the vote on the original motion as amended
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Sovern , Smith, Brown, Mann,
Clayton , Taylor.
Na;rs: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
******
,._
Councilman Mann asked what type of direction was intended to be given
to the Housing Authority concerning the priorities for residency in the elderly
housing project . Councilman Smith responded that his motion was t o request their
reconsideration of these priorities. Councilman Mann stated that he feels this
is unethical for City Council because this matter should be left up to the
Housing Authority .
******
Mayor Taylor adj ourned the City Council meeting at 8 :50 p.m.
City Clerk
. ,
..
I • •
0
· .
'32xl
-
•
•
•
REGULAR ~ffiETING:
•
•
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ~NGLEWOOD , COLORADO
December 20 , 1976
The City Council of the City of Englewood , Arapahoe County , Colorado ,
met in regular session o n December 20 , 1976 at 7:30 p .m.
May o r Taylor , presiding , called the meeting to order ..
The invocation was given by Reverend Fred Hahn , Immanuel Lutheran
Church , 3695 South Acoma . The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Cub Scout Pac k
#137 , Webelows Den #1 .
May or Taylor asked for roll call . Upon the call of the r oll , the
follo win g were present:
Counci l Members Williams , Se vern, Smi th , Brown , Mann , Clayton , Taylor .
Absent : None .
The Mayor dec l ared the motion carried .
Also present wer : ity Manager McCo wn
Asst . City Manage r Nollenber ge r
City Attor ney Berardini
Dir . o f Financ e/City Clerk J ames
Deputy City Clerk Varner
******
COUNCILMAI ~~liTH MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY
COU NCIL MEETING OF DECE!-1BER 7 , 1976 . Councilman Sovern seconded the motion .
Upon a call of he roll , the vote res ted as follows :
Ayes: Co cil Men:bers Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown , Clayton , Tay lor .
Nays : None .
Abstain: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declareJ the moticn carried •
******
E:iward E . Cordova and Paule -ce M. Cordova , 3382 South Florence Court ,
Denver , appeared and requested a transfer of the retail liquor store license
for Englewood Liquor , 3~3 So th Broadway, from Golda B. Marshall , James L .
Girardot and Mary Lou Girardot d e to the change of ownership. Mr . Cordova
stated that he and I~ . Cordova now own and will be operating Englewood Liquors .
'
. '
'
I • •
·' \ I
I
'!'
•
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 3
•
•
a distance of forty -four feet on the sanitary sewer main located in the
existing vacated alley .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO APPROVE THIS ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND PLAZA DE MEDICO . Councilman Severn
seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as f ollows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Sovern, Smith , Brown , Mann , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays: No ne.
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
Assistant City Manager Nollenberger presented a memorandum from
the Di rector of Utilities concerning a gas service easement for the gas
distributi on system at the Bi -Ci ty Treatment Plant . This easement calls
for Public Service Company to extend the distribution system at their cost
in lieu of installing it ourselves and installing on e master gas meter.
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THIS GAS
SER VI CE EASEMENT FOR THE GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTE M AT TrlE BI -CITY TREA~~T
PLANT . Councilman Sovern seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll ,
the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn, Sm i th , Brown , Mann ,
Clayton, Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
RESOLUTION NO . 64 , SERIES OF 1976
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SALARIES FOR THE CITY MANAGER , CITY ATTORNE Y
AllD ~!UNICIPAL COURT JUDGE .
COUNCI LMAN SO VERN MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO . 64 , SERIES OF 1976 ,
IN LUDING $27 ,560/YEAR FOR THE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE AND $110/DAY FOR THE
ASSOCIATE JUDGE; AND TO CORRECT THE RESOLUTION TO READ "1977 APPROPRIATION"
AND "CALENDAR YEAR 1977" RATHER THAN 1976 . Councilman Williams seconded
the motion .
Di scussion followed concerning salary increases and inflation.
Upon a call of the roll , the, vo te r esulted as follows :
Taylor .
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn, Smith , Brown , Clayton ,
'
, .
·. . ' ·' I {
or
I • •
0
-
•
•
•
•
REGULAR MEETING:
•
0 -
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO
Decem ber 20 , 1976
I•
The Ci y Co•ncil of the City of Englewood , Arapahoe County , Colorado ,
met in regular session on December 20 , 1976 at 7 :30 p .m.
Mayor Taylor , presiding , called the meeting to order ..
The invocation was given by Reverend Fred Hahn , Immanuel Lutheran
Church , 3695 South Acoma . The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Cub Scout Pack
#137 , Webelo ws Den #1 .
May o r Taylor asked for r oll call . Upon the call of the roll , the
follo wing were present :
Council Members Hilliams , Seve rn, Smi t!l , Brown, Mann , Clayton , Taylor .
Absen t : None ,
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Also present were : City Manager McCo wn
Asst . City Manager Noll en b erger
City Attorney Berardini
Dir . of Finance/City Clerk James
Deputy City Clerk Varner
******
COUNCILMAN ~liTH MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY
COUNCIL MEETI G OF DECE!-1BER 7 , 1976 . Councilman So vern seconded the motion .
Upon a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as f ollows:
Ayes: Counc i l Members Williams , Severn , Sm ith , Brown , Clayton , Taylo r.
flays : None .
Abstain: Council Member Mann .
The Mayor declared the motion carried •
******
E1ward E . Cordova and Paulette M. Cordova, 3382 South Florence Court ,
Denver , appeared and requested a transfer of the r etail liquor store license
for Englewood Liquors , 3434 South Broadway , from Golda B. Marshall , James L .
Girardot and Mary Lou Girardot due to the change of ownersh ip , Mr . Cordova
stated that he and l~s . Cordova now own and will be operating Englewood Liquors •
'
..
I • •
0
• I
·. f
•
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 2
•
-
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED TO TRANSFER THE RETAIL LIQUOR STORE LICENSE OF
ENGLEWOOD LIQUORS , 3434 SOUTH BROADWAY , FROM GOLDA B. MARSHALL, JAME L. GIRARDOT
AND MARY LOU GIRARD OT TO EDWARD E. CORDOVA AND PAULETTE 1-l . CORDOVA . Councilman
Williams seconded the mo ti on . Upon a all of the roll, the vote resulted as
follows :
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Sovern , Smith , Brown , Mann,
Clayt on , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
"Communications -No Action Recommended " on the agenda were received :
a . Minutes of the Housing Auth o rity meeting of Oc t ob er 26 , 1976 .
b . Minutes of the Police Pension Board meeting of December 8 ,
1976 .
c . ~linutes of the Library Board meeting of December 14 , 1976 .
d . Financial Repo rt for the month of November 1976 .
e . Memorandum from the Di rector of Personnel to the City
Manager concerning his attendance at the Annual Conference
o f the International Personnel Management Association in
Washington , D.C. from November 28 to December 2 , 1976 .
Council discussed a motion in the minutes of the Housing Authority
meeting of October 26 which established the priorities for residency in the
elderly housing project .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED 'll!AT CITY COUNCIL RECOMI-1END TO THE HOUSING
AUTHORITY THAT THEY RECONSIDER THESE PRIORITIES BY CONSIDERI G TO ADD PREVIOUS
LONG -TIME RESIDENTS OF ENGLEWOOD TO THE FIRST PRIORITY AND TO DELETE PERSONS
ONLY WORKING IN ENGLEWOOD FROM THE FIRST PRIORITY . Councilman Clay on seconded
the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Sovern , Smith , Br~~n , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : Council Members Williams, Ma~n •
The Mayor declared the motion ca•:ried .
* * * * * *
Assistant City Manager Nollenb~rger presented a memorandum fr0m the
Director of Utilities concerning an enc1 ·oachment agreement for Plaza de Medico
located in the 3500 block of South Wash :'.ngton . This encroachment would cover
,. .
• •
0
·. .• I I . ,
-
-
•
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 3
•
•
, .
a distance of forty-four feet on the sanitary sewer main located in the
existin vacated alley .
COUNCI~~ SMITH MOVED TO APPROVE THIS ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT
BE TWEEN THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AND PLAZA DE MEDICO . Councilman Seve rn
seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn, Smith , Brown , Mann ,
Clayton , Taylor .
Nays: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
Assistant City Manager Nollenberger presented a memorandum from
the Di rector of Utilities concerning a gas service easement for the gas
distribution system at the Bi -City Treatment Plant . This easement calls
for Public Service Company t o extend the distribution system at their cost
in lieu of installing it ourselves and installing one master gas meter .
COUNCILMAN lo/ILLIW.S MOVED TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THIS GAS
SERVICE EASEMENT FOR THE GAS DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM AT THE BI -CITY TREATMENT
PlANT . Cou ncilman Severn seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll ,
the vote re sult ed as f ollows :
Ayes : Council Members •lilliams , Severn , Smith , Brown , ~lann ,
Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the mo tion carried .
******
RESOLUTI ON NO. 64 , SERIES OF 1976
A RE 'OLUTI ON ESTABLISHING ANNUAL SALA RIES FOR THE CITY MANAGER , CITY ATTORNEY
AN D MU ICIPAL OURT JUDGE .
COUNCILMAN SOVERN ~lO VED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO . 64 , SERIES OF 1976 ,
J LUDING $27 ,560/YEAR FOR THE MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE AND 110/DAY FOR THE
ASSOCIATE JUDGE ; AND TO CORRECT THE RESOLUTION TO READ "1917 APPROPRIATION"
AND "CALENDAR YEAR 1917 " RATHER THAN 1916 . Co uncilman Williams seconded
the mo ion .
Discussion followed concerning salary increases and inflation.
Upon a call of the roll , the-vo te resulted as f ollows :
Ayes : Co uncil Members Williams, Severn , Smith , Brown , Clayton ,
Tayl or .
•.
"
• •
0
•
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 4
!lays : Council Member Mann .
•
-
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
t•
City Attorney Berardini reported on a law suit filed against the
City of Englewoo d, et al , by Lester H. Bolejack concern ing property held as
evidence by the Englewood Police Department since 1974 . Th is case involve s
property from a watch repair shop , and the proper o wners are trying t o be
determined .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a mernorandwn from the Director of
Public Works suggest ing the following meeting schedule for consideration of
Little Dry Creek development al te rnatives:
January 6 -residential area north o f Floyd Avenue and
west of Bannock
January 10 -Sc hool Board
January 13 -residential area east of Bannoc k and west
of Logan
January 20 -Mayor 's Coffee
January 27 -residential area between Logan and Clarks o n
February 3 -Chamber of Commerce and business peo ple ,
lessees and lessors
February 10 & 17 -o pen meetings for other interested
citizens in the City of Englewood outside
of the outlined area
City Man ger McCown no ted that these meetings wi ll beg in at 7 :30p .m.
COUt CIU.IA I SOVERN MOVED TO ADOPT THIS MEETING SCHEDULE AND TO HAVE
A STUDY SES ION ON JANUARY 3 , 1977 TO PLAN THEE MEETINGS . Councilman Smith
seconded the motion . Upon a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Sovern, Smith , Brown, Mann ,
Clayton , Taylor •
I ays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
•.
• •
0
,
•
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 5
•
•
t•
City Manager McCown presented and reviewed a memorandum from the Direct ~r of Finance and Assistant City Manager concerning a budget status report for 1976 .
RESOLUTION NO . 65, SERIES OF 1976
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1976 BUDGET IN THE GENERAL FUND , SEWER ~~D, AND
THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND CONSTRUCTION SUB -FUND .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO PASS RESOLUTION NO . 65 , SERIES OF 1976 .
Councilman Brown seconded the motion . Upon a call of the r oll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown , Mann, Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The ~layor declared the motion carried.
******
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the Assistant City
Manager concerning police and fire pension legislation .
COUNCIL~IAN MANN MOVED TO POSTPONE THIS ITEM FOR FURTHER STUDY .
Councilman Williams seconded the motion . Upon a call of the roll , the vote
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown , Mann , Clayt on , Taylor.
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum concerning vacancies on
the boards and commissions in the City early in 1977 .
COUNCIU!AN MANN MOVED TO HAVE A STUDY SESSION ON JANUARY 24 , 1977
AT 6 :00 P .M. TO INTERVIEW AND CONSIDER APPOINTMENTS TO THE BOARD AND
COMMISSION VACANCIES . Councilman Sovern seconded the motion . Upon a
call of the roll, the vote res lted as follows :
Ayes : Council ~!embers Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown, Mann , Cl ayton , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried •
******
••
·.
• 1
·' I !
'T
I • •
0
-
-
•
•
•
Decemb er 20 , 1976
Pa ge 6
•
0
•
I•
City Manager McCown presented a memoranaurJ froo he Di r ec t or of
Public Works concerning a supplemental agreeMent wi h "he S ate Dep artment
of Highway s covering maintenance on si gnals and s riping along state highways
within the city limits of Englewood .
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS !~OVED TO APPROVE AID AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO
SIGN THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS .
Co uncilman Mann seconded the motion . U n a call o f the roll , the v o te
resulted as follows :
Ayes : Co uncil Members Williams , Severn , Sm ith , Br own , Mann ,
Clayt on , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The May o r declared the motion carried .
******
Gordon Hays appeared representing Winslow Constructi on Com pany ,
3002 South Huron , concerning their lease with the City of Englewood .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED TO REFER THIS MATTER TO THE STAFF AND FOR
CITY COUNCIL TO FURTHER NEGOTIATE WITH WINS LOW CONSTRUCTION COMPAIH . Council-
man So vern seconded the motion . Upon a call o f the roll , the vo te resulted
as follows :
Ayes: Co uncil Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Br own , Mann ,
Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
******
Mayor Taylor stated that he has received a distinguished service
awa rd fr om the United Nations Associati on t o be presented t o Marten athruv
for being in charge of Englewood 's United Natio ns Day for the past tw o years .
COUNCIU~N CLAYTON MOVED THAT THE DISTINGUISHED SER VICE AWARD FR OM
THE UNITED NATION S ASSOCIATION AND A PROC~TION FROM CITY COUNCIL BE PRESEN ED
TO ~~RTEN LATHRUP AT THE MAYOR 'S COFFEE ON JANUARY 13 , 1977 . Counc ilman Brown
seconded the mo tio n •
COUNCI~~ ~~NN MOVED TO AMEND THIS MOTIO BY ALSO DECLARING
JANUARY 13 , 1977 AS ~11\RTEN LATHRUP DAY JN Tiili CITY OF ENGLEWOOD . Councilman
mith seconded the motion . Upon a call of the r oll , the v ote resulted as
follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Man n ,
Clayton , Taylor .
'
I • •
0
·. ,
(
•
•
•
December 20 , 1976
Page 7
Nays : None .
·.
•
0 , .
•
The Mayor declared the moti on carried.
;-
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED TO AMEND Tlili ORIGINAL MOTION BY MOVING THE
MAYOR 'S COFFEE ON JANUARY 13 , 1 77 FRO~! 9 :00A .M. TO 7:30 P .M. Councilman
Clayton seconded the mo ion . Up o n a call of the roll , the vote resulted as
follows:
Ayes: Council !~embers Williams , Severn, Smi th , Brown , Mann,
Clayton , Taylor.
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Upon a call of the roll, the vote on the original motion as amended
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Mann ,
Clayton, Taylor .
Nays : None .
The May or declared the motion carried .
******
Councilman Mann asked what type of direction was intended to be given
to the Housing Authority concerning the pri o r ities for residency in the elderly
ho using project . Council~n Smith responded t hat h i s motion was to reque s t their
rec o nsideration of these priorities . Councilman Mann stat ed t h at he feels this
is unethical for City Council because this matter should be left up t o the
Housing Authority .
******
Mayor Taylor adj ourned the City Council meeting at d :50 p .m .
City Clerk
' ·. . ,
I • •
0
·' ' r ' '!'
(
•
•
•
•
-
PubUth<d
monthly
for citiuns of
Enalewood, Colondo
VO LUME Ill, NU MB ER 8 DECEMBE R 1976
llli!Utiii iiJ~!llf.l.! ... ttilil ~JM't aaeii£0!
ECBC contest seeks essays
with ideas to improve the city
"lmprovt Our Communiry" is tht
thtmt of an tssay contest sponsored br
tht Engltwootl Ctntenniai-Bictntennial
Committet as a wrap-up of the year-long
cdtbration . "For II months we havt
focused on the history of our city, state
and nation ," said Dorothy Romans, txec-
utive secretary to t~e committee. "Now
that the commemorative year is drawing
to a close," sht contin ued, "the com mit-
te< wo uld like to redirect the attent ion
of Engltwood citizens toward t ht future ."
Suggestions should be co nf in ed to those
which can bt implemented with in the city
and should bt described in 250 words or
less, she said . Entrits will bt judged in
five age categories: 8 ye~d under ,
9-12 , 13 -17. 18 -64 and 65 and oys:t.
Prizes to be awarded in each category
art : first, 525; second, SIS ; and third ,
S 10 . A SSO grand prize will bt awardtd to
tht ove rall wmner by the So ut h Conti·
nental Industrial Bank .
Communlty improvement ideas may
also bt submitted in an art form, such as
a painting, design or picture . Any artistic
entnts should be done on pap<r of a "siu
that can be rasily handltd," she said .
Writttn entrits should bt legiblt and
writttn on ont sidt of 8'h x 11" shttts
of paptr . Entrants should writt their
namt , address , phont number and agt
on tht rtverse sidt of tht paper so
each tntry can bt Judgtd anonymously .
Entries should bt sent to the Englt·
wo od Centtnnaal-Bictntennia l Committtt
c/o D .A. Romans , 3400 S . Elati St.,
Englewood, Colo . 80110 by 5 p .m . Mo n-
day, Dec . 20. The winners will be an -
nounctd at tht jan . 3, 1977, Engkwood
City Council Meoting .
'
2 A
• •
0
·' '
-
•• -..J
( GH ,\ND 1'11 1 /.E
Und <·L' 8
(t 9 -12
•
•
•
1.
•
• •
JutTY .1ottl!~UIO 'l 'Y (9 -1 2 )
'/8 1 -h S 'll
J e n·yi Sty ••s , C l :tyt n n :;, h >n l
l•1 .-,.;. F l oy d, T,·:H ~h··r
II nu rab l c ~h ·nllu n :
Gai l Brow n, Clayton ,',.h.,o l
Cht•t·y l F 0 hlht !L'S , C l:t ) l•>ll S• hll •>l
< n,;o l :1 l i n n:
1.
Slt>ph··n Be ll, C l ayle>n Schno l
Bi ll y 1\ul>l i.u s , Clay I <)11 Schoo l
J er ry Monl t;nmcr y
'/81 -5 87 1
2. .Judy Koo n
'/81 -'/!'>9 3
3. fl cnc ' S h illing
'/6 1 --:)80 1
ll nno t·ab l c ~lent. io n :
T.:mr:\ Lynn Sny d 0 r -C l :ly t o n Schoo l
Gvr :\1 d inc ~l ull a ne
'/6 l ··G!H 3
Con s olatio n :
l10ck y A ll c n
7!J 8 -l919
'ff'J·ry Jl ud:l ·c k
Clayto n :'kh oo l
Lcs l N I Shirk
C l ayton S<'hno l
C ari n Ra me r
935 -6 182
D bbie Nel s on
Clayton School
'
,_
• .
"
• •
· . . ,
13 -17
lS -64
•
• c•
•
l.
•
0 -
Hoy C··J·i s e
'/81.-'/1)3 3
2. l1a1 ·b I n c·h l e r
'/S9··t1 1 2 2
3. Janinc C<)O k
7S9-0li 5 3
IT on OLlhlc ·.1<·11l i o n:
John Piz
781 ·-0919
t•
P c ~I4 Y Jo ~lcC oJ l u m
7Gl-ll70
Con s o l aUon:
Touy Shields
7()1 ··-163 9
Snza11 n Mel 't'im :1n
76 1 --0022
.Jill 11<'ckcr
789<H28
Ca •·ol R. Scn n
'/89 -0GH 3
Ros emar y Sa l a ;-ar
935-6!)15
Spe cia l Con s olation:
David Holt
78 9 -2%9
---·· ----··---·. -------·------·--
1.
2.
Marylin C. Blinn
781 -760 6
Virgini:~ All e n
'/98-1919
----------. -------. -------
••
:
'
I • •
0
. ..
Ov e r 6 5 :
• (
•
•
• , .
•
1. E l me r S<;h l age l e r
78 1 -135 2
2 . Al't h u r AndP n;o n
78 1 -:~88 8
• .
..
• •
0
f
•
•
•
• ,_
• •
2 B
City of Englewood
From the Office of the Mayor
James L. Taylor
3400 S. Elati Street
Englewood . Colorado 80110
Phone (303) 761-1 1•0
P R 0 C L A M A T I 0 N
WHEREAS, Marten Lathrop has been an active2artici~~
in the civic activities of the conununity through _his~JL a~
Co-Chairman of t ~t~ze~-teerin conunittee for Housing
for the Elderly as well as a member of t e Revolving -Rehabilita~i.on LQan..-CQmmi~-e na --
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Englewood
is desirous of publicly recognizing and thanking Marten
Lathrop for his work in ch~iring the United-Nations Day
in October 1976...:-
NOW, THEREFORE, I JAMES L. TAYLOR, MAYOR OF THE CITY
OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, do hereby proclaim Thursday,
January 13, 1977 to be
MARTEN LATHROP DAY
in the City of Englewood, Colorado.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL this 3rd day
of January, 1977 .
'
',
', ,
• .
'
• •
0
-
•
•
•
•
t•
•
2 c
LAW Of"'F"IC£5
C RISWELL. PATTERSON & BALLANTINE
.IOHN A. CRIS'olfi:LL
DARY P"TT'[ASON
8f.V(ALY N. B ... LLA NTINI[
3780 SOUTH BROADWAY
£NGLCW0 0 0 , COLORADO 801 I 0
TELEPHONE:: (303) 761 •0800
oJ O~~ N . MC N4,...AAA, .Jilt.
,J O'"'N '[. MYLt•
~·
December 15, 1976 . -... ~ w ... 1 •• ·~ L' :·' t ( : . N I '.j c . . \ .... ·-
Mr. Andy McCown
City Manager
City of Englewood
3400 South Elati
Englewood, Colorado 80110
cjrv t:JH~.f\ :'.tr~. u~; :r::
: ~ • :· .• : .J~)
Re : Phil's Auto Clinic , et al.
Dear Andy :
With res pect to the above matter, you and I apparently
suffered a "conununications breakdown", which was probably my
fault.
In any event, my clients advise that they would, indeed,
desire to appear again before City Council--! understand that
Mr. Picke ll spoke with the mayor and he indicated that this
would be appropriate, under the circumstances. I wonder, there-
fore, if it might be possible to place this matte?;_ on the agenda
f or the first me tin of City Counc~l in January . JJ:tnrs-is
not poss~ e, you might a v~se me o the matter.
JAC:clm
cc : Mr. Phil Pickell
. ,
I • •
0
f
-
'·
•
•
•
• ,_
I• -
City of Englewood
3400 S Elali Street
Englew ood , Colorado 80110
Augus t 5, 1976
Mr. John Cr i swell
Criswell, Patterson and Ballantine
37 80 South Broadway
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Dear John:
Phone (303 ) 761 ·1140
Please e x cept my apolog y Eor the delay i n replying to the problem oE
relocation expen ses Eo -c ertain c li ents of yours operating businesses
in the vi cinit y of Girard and Lincoln Streets. I went on vacation
shortly following our meeting and when I returned , the Finance Director
left for vacation, therefore i t~k me a little t ime to get the necessary
information.
As we have discussed b e fore, and as you know, the City of En glewood does
have a policy tha t we do not pay any relocation ex pen s e s unless federal
f unds are i nvolved and the payment of such expenses are necessitated by
federal requirements. In these cases, the grants made to the City usually
incl ude an amount suffi cient to pay for the relocation expenses. In the
particular project for which the property was purc hased which your clients
l ea se, n o federal fund s were i nvolved and therefore no relocation expenses
are authori zed.
It is my understanding, however, that you feel that such expenses could
be pa id for by the Cit y forgiving the monthly lease payments or perhaps
through some o ther method . Apparently, by doing it in this manner, we
would techn ical ly not be providing relocation expenses but would, in Eact,
be allowing your clients to use the money they would be paying t o the
City for rent for such expenses. The a mount of revenue the City will
r e ceive from the leases is $6,0 50.00. After deduct ion for our e x penses -
$9 43.00 for insurance, $1 ,800 Eor taxes, and $1,000 miscellaneous upkeep -
this leaves a net balance to the City of $2 ,307,00. I assume that from
the estimates your cl1ents have received from moving firms, that this
would not be sufficient to cover all relocation expenses.
It would appear, therefore, that this would be a method that Counc1l
could utilize to provi de some r l ie£ Eor your clients wi thout techni c ally
violating thei~ policy. However although I will certa inly i nform Co unc l l
oE this possibility, I do not Eeel that I can recommend that they do
so. I Eeel that the Council should establish a policy one way or the
other and abide by such a policy with no exceptions.
• ·.
I • •
·' I r
I
'r
-
•
•
Page 2
Hr. Criswell
August 5, 1976
•
0 , .
•
Perha ps we should follow this letter up with another meeting before I make
mg report t o Council . I will give gou a call in the next few dags to do
so. In regards to the fixtures which gou had questions about, I will be
in a better position to respond if gou can provide me with a specific list
of items which gaur clients have questions about.
Once again, mg apologies for not replying ang earlier.
Sincerely,
Andg McCown
Citg llanager
AH/sb
'
'
I • •
0
•
•
•
,. -
LAN OF'f"ICCS
CRISWE LL. F'l\TT E RSON & BALLr\NT10:E
B £VI:iii:LY N . B A LLANTINE
3780 SOUTH BROADWA Y
[N GLCWCOO. COLORADO 801 I 0
T(LEPHONE : (303 ) 761 •0800
.IOHN N . M C N4M 4RA. .JR .
.JOHN 1:. MYLES
•
January 3, 1977
To: Hayor and City Council
Subject: Relocation Expenses for Phil's Auto Clinic,
C & L Auto Body and A & B Transmission
This short memorandum shall merely review the background
"problem" presented by the above matter:
l. The problem.
Each of the above businesses was occupying premises on
East Girard the title to which was acquired by the City without
participation through federal funds. While none were occupying
the premises pursuant to any written lease, the "history" of
their tenancies would indicate that, except for the City's pur-
chase of the property, they could reasonably have expected their
tenancies to continue uninterrupted. However, when the City
acquired the property, it did not recognize that any of the
three businesses had any "interest" in the property for which they
had to be compensated and, in addition, since no federal funds
were involved, the City adopted the policy that there should be
no relocation expenses paid.
In the undersigned's view, this raises two legal questions,
as follows :
a . In Almota Farmers' Elevator and Warehouse Co.
v . United States, 490 U.S. 470, 35 L .Ed .2d 1 (1973),
the United States Supreme Court held that a tenant's
rig ht to compensation was not to be measured solely by
the length of the remaining term of the lease, but,
in s tead, was to be determined by taking into considera-
tion the reasonable probability of the landlord renewing
••
~·
·' \ (
'I'
'
I • •
0
-
•
• (t
•
Mayor and City Counc i l
Page 2
January 3, 1977
•
•
the lease . Under this decision, then, it could be
argued that, even though none of the businesses had
any firm, written lease, they were entitled to be
compensated for the reasonable expectation they had of
continuing renewals, as well as for the value of the
leasehold improvements which were rendered useless by
the termination of the tenancy.
b . 24-56-101 , et se9 ., C.R.S., 1973, requires
local governments to prov1.de "fair and equitable treat-
ment of persons displaced by the acquisition of real
property" where the acquisition is through federally
assisted programs . For what it's worth, it is my view
that thestate, and its political subdivisions, is
required to treat eyery property owner, or tenant,
equally and, again 1.n my view, neither the state nor
the City can base what is, or is not, to be paid solely
upon where the money is to come from. If this property
had been acquired by means of federal funding, the City
would clearly be required to pay relocation assistance .
If property owners, and tenants, under federal programs
are to be paid, it is my view, in order to provide
constitutional equal protection of the laws, the same
type of assistance is required to be paid to property
owners, and tenants, whose property is acquired without
federal asssistance .
2. The Expenses
Each of the businesses involved have, because of the move,
incurred substantial expenses for remodeling and other expenses
which are beyond those which would normally be encountered (See
attachments). In addition, they have continued to pay to the
City their normal monthly rental .
Under these circumstances, we believe that the City should
reimburse them for the estimated moving expenses or, at the very
least, reimburse them the rental payments which they have made
since June 1, 1976 .
JAC:clm
Enc.
A. Criswell
CRISWELL, PATTERSON
& BALLANTINE
,_
•.
I • •
0
•
0 -
Expenses for A & B Transmission
1. Estimated. moving expenses $ 1,626.60
2. Remodeling expenses:
a. Plumbing $ 2,049.62
b. Electrical 600.00
c. Floor 250.00
d. Water pipes and installation 600.00
e. Miscellaneous repairs 800.00
$ 4,299.62
3. Additional lease payments:
Previous Now
$225 per month $750 per month
4. Rental paid to City since June, 1976 $ 1,350.00
• Attachment A
• • •
'
• • . I ·' I I
I
'r '
•
•
•
-
DENVER
BOULDER
CO LORADO SPRINGS
FORT CO LLINS
PUE aLO
GR EEL EY
29\J J S~I G H T O N 9 L\:J OE NVfR, COLORADO 80217 62 3-3221
( B38
ESTIMATED COST OF SERVICES
Name H-+,B foA!IL..S I'1I5.STON "t G-E=r-ta Co. contact:Gt;c/C.E. f3rz.o t-;.!fl/
From,337,f -SoUTH LrrvC.DL-N ~T Phone: 78"9-lf-,~/0
To ~'/11
Packing Re q ue s ted ( 41 /ft ) Load i n g (L\J /fi ) Deli verv(tt:/ /&)
Estimate bv· A.J. I 0 VI fl/0 Phone · b).<] -,3 ~ "). l Date ·
Carta g e or
local movin c : #~ !\'len J Truck s ~ $ (, 7 ~ ner hr.
Extra me n: # ~ [·~e n @ $ ~cJ., 4-0 P e r hr. each
Intras t ate Moving
Cover 10 mi le s ) E st.
He a vv Ha u l: I ~
wei12:ht lbs @ $
( /0 ) hrs. $ 70S
(!OJ hr s .~-~4--<.
~er cwt
:1;
Insu rance : S ' @ $ per $ 100 .00
'rt C
t')te! Ca r ri er liability is CiO¢ per lb per article unless \~·d d i tion al cove r a g e i s pu r chas e d. --.,...----------+------+--1
P ACKING LIS T : No. Ra'te Amount
Sm a l l ca rtons 1 ~ cu.
Medi um c a rtons 1 cu.
Vtardr obe s
Gl a s s Pa c k s
Mnvi !"."' ca rtons 7-_s-N /C---
Total Packing Char ~es
P e rm a n e nt St ora~e
S t ora f"e u er mont h Es t. we iFht lbs @ $ cwt _.s._
Wh se . Handlin"' E st . v1ei !":ht lbs @ S c wt ~
Drav to /f r om ';ihs e . Est . wei<>.:ht lbs @ $ cwt ~~
# i~en T r ucks @ $ oer h r . ~
I nsvran c e $ @ s n er $ 1 00.00 ~
Total Es t io.at~ Cos t :l>lb .7-.b 60
Bil li.n ::; hstrvctions : C.O .D. ( ) CHARGE (......-r IMPORTANT NOTIC£
. ' ••
'
I . •
' ' r I
'!'
• -•.
, .
•
(
Expenses for Phil's Auto Clinic
l. Estimated moving expenses $ 1,590.20 (see attachment)
2 . Remodeling expenses:
a. Sewer hook-up $ 675.00
b. Re-printing of business forms 296.00
c . Transfer phones 96.00
d. Signs 42.50
e. Public Service re-route 25.00
f. Car towing 80 .00
(~ $ 1,214.50
3. Additional lease payments
Previous Now
$250 per month $540 per month
4. Rental paid City since June, 1976 $ 1,750 .00
• • Attachment B I . •
0
.. .• \ !
' '!' • •
•
•
•
-
DENVE R
BOULDER
COLORADO SPRINGS
FORT CO LLISS
PUEilLO
GREELEY
...
DENVER , COLORADO 80217 62l ·ll21
B38
ESTIMATE D COST OF SERVICES
/1 l/ T 0 Cc 1-:J: /1/ Z C: Contact: PH I L-P .rcK.E.L-1-
From :6$ /:::. 11 ST Phone :
ToW
Pa c kin ~ Re ouested
E st imate b v · N r 0 v :r /110 ~· . Phon e · 0J.. 3 -J ;1,). I Date: . '
Ca rta ge o r ·~
loc a l movi n a : # Men ~ Tru ck s @ $ 'f..f ...JP-ner hr. cl?.J hrs . $ ,t;. 79_
Ex tra men : # .:l. Me n @ $ ~d.. 'fOPer hr . e a ch (I al-l hrs . $.~u ,CJ
Intras t ate Moving
(Ov er 10 miles ) Est . w e i ~<h t l b s @ $ n er cw t $
Heavv Haul : ~
I""-..... 1 .t. • ....JJ £. /.;r ,c,-oo o ~ ~ .AO. !9--,~-~ ..IVL, $ :.,t, s '1?
f f 111 .A-~ l I $
\. ,j)
?h ird Par tv chr e:s :r-··v·"'7 ~..., .Y tv-r:-t..-f<. Il-frt ~~ ~·~ ~_;,j_ ,.,
-.,r-/.1 .·,. v>A -~ /&-rv-n -t-..-a .. c t -'I u. 11 v .. $
I ns.uranae : £ @.ai_ 'ner $ 100 .00 ~
~te ! Carr ier li a bility is 6 0 ¢ per lb
additi o nal cove r a.c<e is 2urchased .
per a r t icle unl ess
PAC KI NG LIST : No . RA ~e Amount
Small c artons l~ c u .
Medium cartons 1 c u .
Wa r d robes
Glass Packs
Mov in-"' cartons ,r:; 0 .PIC-L
Ot h er .:J. ~ S" £L J'.L.. (4.} -A J.. , lfO e..,., .-1-l.{.v-. . I I ;:;l.
0
To ta l Pac!<in o-Charo-es j)__
'P e r mane n t Stora g-e
Stora p e ner month Est . wei p-ht lbs @ $ cwt ~
\'lhse . HandlinE Est . weie:ht l bs @ $ c wt ~
Drav to/from J:lhse. Es t . wei .e:ht lbs @ $ cwt $
Drav to/from \'lhse . # flie :1 Trucks @ $ ner hr . ~
Inst~rance $ @ $ p er$ 100 .00 <t-
To t al Estitr.ate Co st ;r,l..£90
Billing Jnstruc tio:1s : c .o.D. ( ) CHARG !': ( 1/'1 IMPORTANT NOT ICE
diJ
1{.£
11./.£L
1-
-
l~o
This estima te co .. rt onl y th• o rticln a ftef servicH listed. It is JtOt a war ..
ronty or re prtHntatiort th ot th e octuol charge will not e•ceed tfte omOu rtt
-----______________ of th e n ti"'ate. ComrftOrt 4:a rften ore re qu ir-ed b, low to c ol f.ect tro l'lsport o .
·-=====~:-:====-------------•io n and other inci d enta~l chorget cOm)'uted on th e bo sft o f roh's show" i"
thei' lawfully published tre iffs, reg ord leu of pri or reh q..ototiOM or ftti• I mo tH mode by th e co"i" o' its agents .
:(~ -•••••s•••~t~H~41:::::·:-aa••--·:·A L. L 1· E-D------••1'!223·''ti la!'J~H:!l1flf!~• .. -f)
. ,
• •
I • 0
'
•
-
Expenses for C & L Auto Body
1. Estimated moving expenses
(see attachment)
2. Remodeling Expenses
a. Building material for shop and paint booth $ 649.27
b. Material for fence 296.74
c. Stairs for shop 67.28
d. Rental equipment 70.18
e. Paint booth permit 83.50
f. Freight fee for paint booth 345.82
g . Concrete for booth 213.17
h. Lighting and equipment for booth 581.21
i. Electrical fees 600.00
(~, j. Sign for building 90.00
k. Paint booth and fire system 6,400 .00
3. Additional lease payments
Previously Now
$250 per month $634 per month
4. Rental paid City since June, 1976
•
Attachment C
•
•
$ 1,635.80
$ 9,397 .17
$ 1,250.00
·' \ !
'r
'
• •
0
,
-
•
•
•
0
•
OENV~R
BO U LDER
COLOPADO SPRINGS
FORT CO LLiNS
PUE BLO
GREELEY
OE.r-iVfR . COLO::tAOO 80 217 62J-3221
B38
ESTIMATED COST OF SERVICES .J3 0.]) Y Contact :CHI1R LIE
From3 .395 ..Sov-rH L-r 111 c.. o '-/1/ Phone:
To it} f1
Packinu Re
Estimate bv·fl/, Iov.rNO , Phone s6~ 3-3 f-.A I ~ Dates
Cartage or . :l
local movinc-: # Me n ~ Trucks @ $ 'f,lj -~per hr. (/0) hrs. $4-)..4-
Extra men : # ;:;1.. i"le n @ $ ;}..).. ,.:t::t.!-Per hr. each UllJ. hrs. $_ -~ ij. ..J,
Zntras tate Movilg
Over 10 mi les Es t . wei P.:ht lbs @ $ .11_e r cwt :!;
Heavy Haul : $
I -??-1~ I h.......lt "-"/7 -~_OO_D$.::. <'$ . .). {j. "<) /U1. _Lt.c<-<-t-~.+-.0'-1
f I In ./~) $
~
?hir d Partv chrc-s :r..l .-.A. '/'C'_j/ LC.. ""L -<A?.. :h-t. Lt;,__Lt; ~ ...a..-!.;..,...-"7? 0'18/l I ~(? J-,5_
(.i--Yvf ~~""'-1--.'1..--<2.-A-1.<'-t. J,...,._J/. 1~-..JL A -r 4.<./-r (. _/) • • :t
Ins urance : $ I ~ @ $ pe r $ 100 .00 I l_$_
11>t e ! Carrier liabi lity is M¢ p e r lb per arti cle unless
J ditional covera.<?e is 2urchased .
PAC KING LIST : No . Ra ~e Amount
Sma ll car to n s H cv . _$_
Medium cartons 1 c u . :1;
t;;ar drobes "' Glass Fa c%s .s
Movi n<>: cartons 7 .... 1) IIJIL--:1;
Other 01... ~ b ..... Ll. Aa.. I< ~:1...'10 ~ ........ .h !1: I ,<,.'i-:_ , CT
Total Packin<?: Char::res :B_
Permane n t S tora e:e
S tora Pe ner month Est . weicrh't lbs @ $ cwt _$_
Whse . EandlintT Est . weieht lbs @ ~. cwt £.
Drav toffrn:n Whse . Est . wei.tTht lbs @ S cwt ~
Drav to/from '.'ihse . # r~'len Trucks •?> $ oer h r . ..s.
Insvrance ~ @ $ per $ 100 .00 a-
TotaJ Estirr.ate Cost .t lb3s
Billin g Tnstrt'C t i ons : c .o .o. ( ) CHARGE (VJ IMPORTANT NO TICE
tgo
14-t
ao
1-
IW.
ISO
This ntimote co..-ert only the art icles ond scn·iua listH. It h not 0 ..,0 , ..
----------------------ronty or repreHntotion thot the octuol charge wilt not exceed the amount
___________________ af the estimate . Comma" co,.,ien ON required by low to collect horuporto ..
--=:==::=:-::=-:-::-::=:==:=-=::-.:::=-.::-:=:======:-::=-:: tion and other incide11tol charges computed on the basts of rates shown in
•
-tlt eir lawfully pwblished treiHs. rego,.dlns of prior rote quotations or ..m ..
mot£t mode by the co,iH or ih ogeMs.
-ALL lED-•• +•u '!Bif ~ ~
'
• •
'
•
•
•
• •
•
•
.. -
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
November 16, 1976
3 A
I • CALL TO ORDER.
The regula r meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission
was called to order at 7 :00 P.M. by Vice-Chairman Ed Smith.
Members present : Jorgenson, Wade, Williams, Jones, Parker
Pierson, D. Smith, Ed Smith ·
Wanush, Ex-officio
Members absent : Tanguma
Also present: Assistant Director Romans ; Planning Associate
House; Assistant City Attorney DeWitt
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
Vice-Chairman Ed Smith stated that Minutes of November 9, 1976, were to be considered for approval.
Williams moved:
Parker seconded: The Minutes of November 9, 1976, be approved
as written .
AYES: Wade, Williams, Jones, Jorgenson, Parker, Don Smith, Ed Smith
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN : Pierson
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion carried.
III. AUTO WRECKING YARDS
Revision of Ordinance
Vice-Chairman Smith asked for the staff presentation.
Mr. Wanush stated this process was started several months ago
following meetings between the Commission and the auto wrecking
yard owners who were interested in improvement of their
business. The City of Englewood does not now permit auto
wrecking yards in any of the Zone Distri cts; those that are
in existance are non-conforming. Non-conforming Uses are not
permitted to expand or extend the use except to provide additional
off-street parking. The auto wrecking yard owners wanted per-
mission to improve their businesses by constructing garages
where they could dismantle cars, store parts, and sell these
parts, or office buildings . Rather than making the auto
wrecking yards permitted uses in any zone district, the staff
has dra fted an ordinance which would, upon application, make
auto wrecking yards a Conditional Use in one or both o f the
industrial districts. The staff has also drafted a proposed
• \ (
'\'
'
I
f
-
•
•
•
•
•
-2-
amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, which sets
forth specific criteria under which a Conditional Use may be
granted. This proposed amendment would apply to all Conditional
Uses, such as day care centers, etc. Mr. Wanush stated that
while the draf t amendment to the Auto Wrecking Yard Ordinance
does not set forth in which zone district the auto wrecking
yards would be p e rmitted as Conditional Uses, the staff would
suggest that the I-2 Zone District be so designated. Mr.
Wanu sh stated that the staff suggests that the Auto Wrecking
Yard Ordinance be made a part of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, also. This would keep all Ordinances pertaining to
auto wrecking yards in one general Ordinance and alleviate
considera ble cross-referencing.
Mr. Parker asked if these proposals would affect all Non-
conforming Uses? Mr. Wanush stated that if the Conditional
Use criteria were approved, it would apply to all Conditional
Uses approved by the Commission.
Mrs. Romans stated that at the meeting in August with the auto
wrecking yard owners, it was pointed out that several of these
businessmen would like to improve their operation, but have
been unable to do so as a Non-conforming Use. Mrs. Romans
outlined the area on a map where the auto wrecking yards are
concentrated, noting that the boundary between the I-1, Light
Industrial Zone District, and the I-2, Heavy Industrial Zone
District, extends down South Raritan Street. Three of the auto
wrecking yards are located west of South Raritan Street in the
I-1 Zone District, the rest are to the east of South Raritan
Street in the I-2 Zone District. Mrs . Romans stated that the
staff has considered recommendi~ that those auto wrecking yards
in the I-2 Zone District be permitted to apply for Conditional
Use status. Were this concept to be adopted, those three auto
wrecking yards which are in the I-1 Zone District would con-
tinue as Non-conforming Uses and would not be permitted to im-
prove. Mrs. Romans pointed out that by making an auto wrecking
yard a Conditional Use, there could be applications for new
auto wrecking yards in any zone district that permits them as
a Conditional Use --it would not apply to only those auto
wrecking yards that are in existance now. Under the terms
of the proposed amendments, before any of the existing auto
wrecking yards could make improvements, they would have to
apply for approval as a Conditional Use and it would have to
be approved _by both the Planning Commission and the City Council.
Mrs. Romans stated that the Commission has considered several
requests for day care centers to be approved as Conditional
Uses, but there have been no real guidelines to follow in this
procedure. The proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance would provide these guidelines for any use which is
listed as a Conditional Use in any zone district. Mrs. Romans
stated that applications for a Conditional Use must be reviewed
by the Planning Commission . The Planning Commission would be
the final approving authority for Conditional Uses permitted in
-
.• \ !
'!'
•
-
•
•
•
,. -
•
•
-.j-
residential zone districts. In the business and industrial
zone districts, the application would have to be approved by
the Planning Commission and referred to City Council for their
approval. If both bodies approve the Conditional Use applica-
tion, the approval would then be signed by the Chairman of the
Commission and by the Mayor prior to being recorded in Arapahoe
County. The Planning Commission must hold a Public Hearing on
the request for Conditional Use; the City Council may hold a
Hearing on those matters which go before them at their discretion,
but a Public Hearing is not required. Findings of Fact will
be required of the Commission and the City Council and certain
conditions must be found to exist prior to approval. The pro-
posed amendment on Conditional Uses would be added ~o the
Supplementary Regulations contained within the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance.
Mrs. Romans then reviewed proposed amendments to the Auto
Wrecking-Junk Yard Ordinance. Mrs. Romans stated that the
initial proposal is to eliminate the Junk Yard references
throughout the Ordinance. There is only one junk yard in the
City at this time, and it appears that it is being conver t ed
more to an auto wrecking yard. An auto wrecking yard must
still have a permit, and a purchase register is required. It
is suggested that the requirement of licensing be eliminated
from this Ordinance and that the licensing provision be made
part of Title IX of the '69 E.M.C.
Mrs. Romans stated that existing auto wrecking yards would
remain as Non-conforming Uses unless they applied for a
building permit to make improvements; at that time the yard
would have to be approved as a Conditional Use before a permit
could be obtained.
Mrs. Romans pointed out some of the changes in the proposed
revision, such as providing that driveways could be 35 ft. in
width rather than the present 20 ft. maximum.
Mr. Parker stated that he feared if the auto wrecking yards
were made Conditional Uses , and new yards could be approved
on this basis, that there would be others wanting to start
such a business in the industrial districts . He acknowledged
that the auto wrecking yard owners in business now do need
help to improve their business, but he questioned that the
City really wanted more auto wrecking yards.
Mr. Wanush stated that he felt the Commission should consider
the question "why do you want to keep new auto wrecking yards
out?" He noted that the proposed revision of the Auto Wrecking
Yard Ordinance and of the proposed Conditional Use section
are performance standards designed to assure there will be no
adverse impact on the neighborhood. Discussion ensued.
Don Smith noted that the proposal had not defined "expand" as
had been previously discussed. He stated that if "expand"
could be defined as permitting improvements but not expanding
beyond the present physical boundaries, he felt this would
permit the improvements without changing the status from a
•
. .
1 r
'!
I • •
-
•
•
•
•
I • -
-4-
Non-conforming Use to a Conditional Use. He felt if the staff
could de f ine the permi t to expand as not going beyond the
existing boundaries, the present ordinance would apply.
Assistant City Attorney DeWitt stated that possibly the staff
could rome up with a definition of "expand" that would control
interior improvements but limit physical expansion of the site.
Discussion ensued. Mr . Wanush stated that if the Commission
fee ls that the auto wrecking yards should not be permitted in
the City of Englewood, then existing yards should not be en-
courag ed to improve nor be given the opportunity to improve
the business. Rather, restrictions that would tend to encourage
t hese businessmen to move elsewhere should be enforced. Further
discussion followed.
Mr. Parker stated that he felt the monthly inspections could
be interpreted as harassment. Mrs. Romans pointed out that
these uses can be potential fire hazards and the inspections
by the Fire Department and the Code Enforcement Division have
considerable merit and are not intended to be harassment.
Don Williams stated that he understood f rom the meeting with
auto wrecking yard owners that they wanted permission to expand
within their present boundaries --construction of garages and
parts storage/sales areas.
Don Smith stated that he had reservations about designating
the auto wrecking yards as Conditional Uses; he felt that
consideration should be given to allowing internal improvement
and expansion, but have the yards remain as Non-conforming Uses.
He stated that he would agree that the monthly inspections are
necessary, but he could understand that the auto wrecking yard
owners might regard them as harassment. Mr. Smith stated that
h e felt these businessmen should be given the right to con-
struct a garage in which to dismantle cars, and an area to
store the useable parts.
Ed Smith noted that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance does
not permit this type of operation within the City of Englewood;
h owever, the City cannot force these businessmen out. The
City is obligated to let these businesses remain as long as
they are of benefit to the people of Englewood. Mr. Smith
stated that these uses would have to comply with given require-
ments e ven as a Non-conforming Us e •
Mr . Williams suggested that possibly auto wrecking yard owners
would be interested in receiving copies of the staff proposal
to determine whether or not they were in favor of the proposals.
Mrs . Pierson ask ed if there was a penalty clause? Mrs. Romans
stated that the penalty clause is contained in the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance, and would apply to all sections of that
Ordinance.
'
I • •
f
-
•
•
•
•
-
-5-
Mr. Jones stated that he is very concerned about permitting the
auto wrecking yards as Conditional Uses in the I-1, Light In-
dustrial Zone District. He noted that there is considerable
land that could be used for auto wrecking yards in that zone
district, and he felt the auto wrecking yards would serve asa
deterrent to businesses that might have a better tax base. Mr.
Jones stated that he felt the Conditional Use status would en-
courage more auto wrecking yards in this area.
Don Smith suggested that a poll of the Commission be taken to
determine their opinion of Conditional Use status ~s. Non-
conforming Use status of the Auto Wrecking Yards.
Mr. DeWitt pointed out that under the staff proposal, an auto
wrecking yard would remain no n -conforming until the owners
applied for a permit to impro ve the property; at that time,
the Commission would consider approval of the Conditional Use.
Discussion ensued. Mrs. Wade reviewed her understanding of
the discussion thus far ; the auto wrecking yards are non-
conforming and would remain non-conforming until they made
application for improvement under the staff proposal. The
auto wrecking yards would, following approval by the Planning
Commission and City Council become Conditional Uses rather
than Non-conforming Uses. Mrs. Wade stated that she felt this
was "opening the door rather wide". Discussion ensued.
The problems of making auto wrecking yards Conditional Uses
over those experienced now when they are Non-conforming Uses
were discussed at length.
It was determined that the staff would make an attempt to
define "expand" to allow the auto wrecking yard owners to
improve their business, but not permit physical expansion of
the site.
The fact that other Non-conforming Uses would not be allowed
the same privilege of "improving" was also discussed. Mrs.
Romans stated that Non-conforming Uses are allowed to be brought
up to code; however, they may not expand by adding another room
or some similar improvement.
Don Smith pointed out that the auto wrecking yard owners want
permission to construct a garage where they may dismantle cars
during the winter months ; they also want some place where they
can store parts in a safe, dry, clean condition for resale •
This would enable the wrecking yard owners to dispose of the
auto hulks, and give them more room for their operation. Mr.
Jones agreed that the auto wrecking business has changed to a
"used part recovery service ."
Further discussion ensued. Mrs. Romans stated that staff
would be in favor of adopting the proposed performance standards
for Conditional Uses whether or not they apply to auto wrecking
yards. These performance standards, if recommended and approved
by the Commission and City Council, would be incorporated inb
• . , ·' \ !
'r
I • •
-
•
•
•
0 I•
•
-6 -
t h e Com prehens i v e Zo n ing Ordinanc e , and would apply to all
Co nd i tional Uses .
I t was a g ain stated th at t h e staf f wi ll a ttempt to define
"ex p and" to allow a u t o wr ecking y a rds to improve within their
physic a l b o u nda r ies as Non·•conformi n g Uses.
IV. DI RECTOR 'S CH OICE
Mr. Wanus h discuss e d t he propo s ed I-470 . He noted that the
City o f Litt le t on i s opposed to t h e Santa Fe routing for the
i n terstate . He stated there will be a second meeting of the
western Arapahoe County jurisdictions on November 18th, in
the Engl e wood City Hall Community Room, and an attempt will be
made t o come to some a g reement. Mr. Wanush stated that a meeting
has bee n scheduled with Mr. Brasher on November 17th, to discuss
t h e t r ans f er alternatives. Mr. Wanush displayed a design of
a pro p ose d intersection at Santa Fe and U.S. 285 if the inter-
s t a te syst e m was designated on Santa Fe. This intersection
d es i gn wa s de livered to the office from SWACT. This proposed
in ter se ct i o n calls for the split of U .S . 285 between Ithaca
an d Hampden Avenue into a one-way cuplet.
A r ev iew o f t he pre vious meeting with the western Arapahoe
Co u n t y j u ris dictions was given, as was a review of Mr. Wanush's
meet i ng with the Littleton City Council. Discussion ensued.
Mr . Jone s asked if there was any real "hold" that the Englewood-
L ittleton area would have on funds once they were transferred
o r wo ul d it b e at th e discretion of the Highway Commission as
to which p r o jec t s were funded? Mr. Wanush stated that if the
p ropo sed trans f er were recommended for a specific system, tha t
s y stem wo u ld be funded. The transfer of funds could also be
rec omm ended f or no specific sy:;tem. Mr. Wanush noted there is
n o agreement now b e tween the jurisdict i o n ti in western Arapahoe
Coun ty o n wh a t the transfer would be used for. Discussion en-
sued .
Th e trans fe r of funds was discussed at length. The routing
f or t h e p roposed Interstate was also discussed. Mr. Wanush
s ta t ed that a "circumferential" route around the south metro
area was d e signa t ed f or I-470, and that this circumferential
rou t e is the onl y inters t a t e route the Federal Government is
aware o f , The fu nds in the Hig hway Trust Fund are for the con-
str uction o f t he inte rs t ate sys t em ; there would be no actual
"transfer" o f fun ds ; rather , f unding would have to be appropriated
by t h e Federal Go vernme n t t o f inance an al t ernative to the inter-
st a te.
Furt her discussi on e nsued.
•
·' ' I
'r
"
I • •
'
•
•
•
•
0
V. COMMISSION'S CHOICE
-7-
Ed Smith asked when there would be further discussion on the
Comprehensive Plan? Mrs. Romans stated that this would be
scheduled for the next work session. The Commission needs to
decide what procedure they want to fol low on the revision of the Plan.
The meeting adjourned at 8 :45 P.M •
• •
0
. '
•
•
•
PRESENT:
•
,. -
MINUTES
Board of Career Service Commissioners
December 16, 1976
,._
ABSENT:
Herbert R. Hosanna, Jo Ellen Turner, William Hanson, Bob Brundage, Ed White
None
ALSO PRESENT:
Bill Belt, Leon Mull
Rich Lorig, Karl Nollenberger, Hugh Brown,
Margaret Freeman, Andi Mikesell , Tony Mikesell,
The mlnutee or the meetlnge or Oetober 14, 1976 and November 23, 1976 were approved as presented.
* * * *
The Board eet a date to hear the grlevanee or Andrea Mikeeerr eoneernlng her not being hired ror the POe1t1on or Computer Operator, It wae
dee1ded that the Board would deeide Whether it wae a gr1evabre matter
and, 1r it wae, hear the grlevanee on January 20, 1977 , at the regular Career Service Board meeting.
* * * *
The Board reeelved a memorandum rrom City Manager, Andy MeCown, regarding the Propoeed Benehmark-Faetor Ranking elaee1r1eat1on Plan that had
been Propoeed by the City, In hie memo, Mr. MeCown told the Board that
the City wae Withdrawing 1te propoeai and requeeted the Board to
eet about determining what type or e1aee1r1eat1on Plan would beet work for the City of Englewood .
After quite a bit or dieeuee1on, the Board deelded that the etudy
eeee1one on e1aee1Cieat1on Plane ehou!d not be attempted unt11 Mareh
beeauee three or the eurrent Board membere• terme w111 expire at that time.
Rev. Hoe anna requeeted that a memo go out 1nrorm1ng the emp!oyeee that
the e urrent appeare would be held roc ruture rererrenee In eaee the
Board deeld ee that the Benehmark-Faetor Ranking eyetem 1e, indeed, the
better Plan roc the City, At the eurrent time, there 1e nothing to
ap pe a l , since the proposal has been withdrawn by the City,
MAS. TURNER MOVED, AND MR. HANSON SECONDED, THAT STUDY SESSIONS FOR
THE PURPOSE OF SELECTING A TYPE OF CLASSIFICATION PLAN FOR THE CITY
BE DELAYED UNTIL THE NEW CAREER SERVICE BOARD IS APPOINTED AND THAT THE MATTER BE FIRST ON THE AGENDA FOR THAT BOARD.
Ayes: Hosanna, Turner , Hanson, Brundage, White Nays: None
The motion carried .
• * • •
289
'
'
I • •
·' \ !
• ' '!
-
•
•
•
• ,_
-
* * * *
The Board received a copy of the job description for the position
of Juni or Accountant in t h e Finance Department. Mr. Lorig went
over the description with the Board and requ e sted that they recommend
t o City Council that the posit i on be placed in the classificatio n
plan at a grade 5 .
MR. HANSON MOVED, AND MR. WHITE SECONDED , THAT THE BOAR D REC OMMEND
TO COUNCIL THAT THE POSITION OF JUNIOR ACCOUNTA NT BE PLACE D IN THE
J OB CL ASSIFICATION AT A GRADE FIVE.
Ayes:
Nays:
Hosanna , Turner , White , Hanson, Brundage
None
The motion carried .
* * * *
Under Employees Assoc iations' Choice , Margaret Freeman, pres ident of
the Englewood Employe es ' Association , requested that a s tat ement
be made as to whether th e presidents of the three ass oc iations would
"automatically" be allowed to attend meetings, etc. in an official
cap acit y when required because o f their office, rather than having
to as~ permission of their depart me nt head .
Mr . Nollenberger, Assistant Ci ty Manager, stated that it is alre ady
covered in section 1 37 :7 of the Ci t y Charter , but that department
heads should always be informed of the whereabouts of their employ e es.
The Fire Association was not represented.
* * * *
Under Personnel Di rector 's Choice , Mr . Lorig requested that two seasonal
employees from Park s be allowed to continue working , rather than be
laid off for the seaso n, so that the extra help could be used in
construction of the c l ub house for the golf course.
MR. BRUNDAGE MOVED , AND MR . WHITE SECONDED , TO RETAIN TWO SEAS ONAL
PARKS EMPLOYEES , SCOTT POOLE AND MIKE AUSTIN , FOR A PER I OD NOT
LONGER THA JANUARY 1 , 1977 TO DECEMBER 31 , 1 977 .
Ayes: Hosanna , Turner, Hanso n, Brundage, White
Na ys: None
The motion caFried .
Mr. Lorig a · so requested the Board remove from the City classification
plan he pos itions of Parking Enforcement Maid, Communications
Su pervisor , and Environmental Specialist . He stated that the positions
were not in the 1977 budget and that keeping the position titles in
the job classification plan would in no way enable the persons currently
holding the positions to remain in their jobs.
Board membe rs expressed re g ret and concern for the four p ersons who would
lose their jobs because of the budget decre ase .
290
• . '
P.L
m
'
• •
• (
(
I
l
I
(
f
•
•
I• -
MRS. TURNER MOVE D, AN D MR. BRUNDAG E SECO NDED , TO REM OVE THE POSITIONS
OF PARK I NG ENFORCEME NT MAID, COMMUNICATIO NS SUP ERVISOR AND ENVIRONMEN TAL SPE CIALI ST FRO M THE JOB CLASSIFICATI ON PLA N.
Ay e s :
Nays: Hosa n na, Turner, Brundage
White, Hanson
The moti o n carried.
Mr. Lorig showed the Board a copy of the new
whi c h the Personnel Department is now using.
me e t s EEO requirements and contains a phrase
the ap p licat ion is open for public view.
employment applica t i on form
Unlike the old one, it
regarding the fact that
• * * •
MR. HANSON MOVED, AND MRS. TURNER SECONDED, TO DECLARE THE FOLLOWING POSITIONS VACANT:
Leadworker -Parks & Recreation
Intermediate Clerk-Typist -Public Works
Junior Account Clerk -Purchasing Maintenanc~ Worker -Parks & Recreation
Junior Accountant -Finance
Ayes: Hosanna, Turner, Hanson, Brundage, White Na ys: None
The mo tio n carried.
• * • •
MR . BRUND AGE MOVED, AND JllR. WHITE SECONDED, TO CERTIFY THE FOLLOWING ELI GIBILITY LI ST S:
Captain -Police
Sergeant -Police
Ayes: Hosanna, Turner, Hanson, Brundage, White Nays: None
The motion carried. * •••
Personne l Actions:
NAME DEPT. & TITLE GRADE & STEP
Anni versary Increase
J a mes Lloyd Maintenanceworker -Parks 2D t o
effective l/l/7 7 2E
J r . Account Cl er k -Fin a nce lD t o
effective l/l/77 lE
Maintenanceworker -Traffic 2B to
effective l/l/77 2C
J ean Mont g o mery
Ron Norden
-----·-------------------------------
291
•.
'
• •
0
•
0 •
NAME ______________________ ~D~E~P~T~·~&~T~I~T=L=E ______________ G~R~A~D~E~&~S~T~E~P __ __
Probationary to perm. status without increase in pay:
Clifford Selby Lieutenant -Fire
effective 1/1/77
Probationary to perm. status with increase in pay:
Jay Babb Wastewater Treatment Maint. App./Opr.
effective 1/1/77
Request for extension of permanent status:
Cindy Galligan
Promotion:
Jerald Vaughn
Progress Reports :
William Young
Harold Gerlick
George Garnett
i'les Whigham
Pat rick McCoy
W.J. Jarrett
Danny Wegener
Jr. Account Clerk -Finance
Police Off icer 1st Class to
Sergeant
effective 12/16/76
Street
Parks
Parks
Servicenter
Fire
Fire
Fire
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned
at 8:10p.m .
HERBER~HOSA NA
Chairman
/bjj
•
Recording Secretary
292
..
• •
0
(
•
..
RESOLUTI ON NO.--!__, SERIES OF 1977.
; A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE POSITION OF JUNIOR ACCOUNTAN T AT GRADE 5 .
WHEREAS, the Boa rd of Career Service Commissioners, in their meet ing or December 16, 1976, recommended the position of Junior
•
Ac countant be established at grade 5
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RES OLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, that the following position be established:
DEPARTMENT
Finance POSITION TITLE
Junior Account a nt
5
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this l££_day of
January , 1977 . ----~--~----
Mayor
ATTEST:
ex{)ff icio City Clerk-Treasurer
I, William James, ex officio City Clerk of the City of
Engl,wood , State of Colorado, hereby oertify that the above is a true,
a oourate , and oomplete oopy or R'solution No. _]__, s,ries or 1977.
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
. I
I . •
0
f
•
•
I
I .;.
•
•
0 t• -
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of Englewood City Council
FROM: Andy McCown, City Manager
DATE: December 20, 1976
SUBJECT: AID TO OTHER AGENCIES
In January of each year, the Council usually considers the aid"to other agencies
requests made by organizations In the community. For 1977, the City Council
budget Includes $24, 000 for this purpose. So far we have had formal requests
by Inter-Faith Task Force ($5, 400), Arapahoe Mental Health ($3, 000), Housing
Authority ($1, 769), Arapahoe House for Detoxification ($5, 000), Chamber of
Commerce (unspecified amount).
The contributions in 1976 totaled $23,754. They were as follows:
Community Arts Symphony
Inter-Faith Task Force
Arapahoe Mental Health
Arapahoe House for Detoxification
Englewood Housing Authority
Englewood Parade Committee
Chamber of Commerce
Englewood Jaycees
League of Women Voters
E .C.B.F. Dinner
Englewood Eagles
Englewood High School
T<.fl'A L
$1,800 .
5,000.
1,000.
5,000.
1,546 .
2,500 .
5,000 .
800 .
200 .
768
40
100
$23,754
We have had some calls as to what Procedure the Councll plans on ustng this year,
and we would be glad to discuss it with you at your convenience.
Sincerely, [~J::a;;;~~
AN~cCOWN
Ci ty Manager
AMc C/p
B. V. Berardini, City Attorney
Karl Nollenberger, Assistant City Manager
CC:
'
• •
0
· . . .
-
•
•
•
• I•
•
'"'••r-•..-••trn Ta8k Force I= far Community Service, Inc,
. . • : • ·~ .I
3370 Soutlllrvl"'l . E11111ew00d. ~-•no. ~.,, ,..,_,
AiwlciiiJ .... vla
Exavtlve DINCtor
IDclewocl Ci t7 Ball
IDilewocl Ci t7 CwDoil
Ytoo a..&tll Kl.aU
laalhOed, Coior.M 8o110
.ltt1 Na,..r 'l'Q-1or 1114 Cit7 Cealloil
.;.
I ban acloaecl oar bQdaot for 1917 tNa tllo l'iuaoo ec.ii-ttee ·ei lftl'.· ·. , \ . ··
Ve approciato JWl' laolp to u azul the f..uiM w urn 1ll 1lle pUt ~: :
aDd hopo ,._ will oetimle to Ulp u awn ~ t..ut• ~ tllo a..l~· -
e-mit,-. . ·; .,
Oar requeat t. ,_ ter 1917 te .. -· 1aozoeuo 91' .-oo.oo. · ti.. ..... ~/~-·
t.aili .. b&Yo illoro"uecl 1D tllo put JUno 1aptO"•ll7 tllo ...U ~ ... J.ier
Citis_.. Ov aw prep-a "llboola to 111a1a• Hrri118 a.,l...-Citi ... U.. addM
20 pooplo to~ ~t.ioa :5 clap a wolt, a41dlliHNue to 5 dqa a . ·',
week 1D lloY.-er. 'ftlla PNCna baa pNYOd te 1N ..,_., ~t to tllo IIM11aa ·
or our Seier Cltis .. 1D tbia ~t,-. I baYO oul~ a ·...,. wrl"-l -, ..
ODe or our t~~~~lo,-eoa dri'YiDa tor u bolpiaa 1a tllle Jll'Oil'la• ·:
Ve han nov nor 2,259 f..tliu • nr tilft, .tr.a tll:la f1aVe 862 U. ·~ lfeltaro,·
219 ora Soo. Soo. or diub111t7 azul tho reat are .lft.iDooM wdE:iDI f-.tU•• · ·,
Ve ban treupol"tod nor -.85} ..-ple· •-i•c tho tiNt t -t:U ..t tld.a J'MI"• ·
a.-.1 a4 lledlcal .laeiateaoo, hod ... ·cl.nldaa Ull .....,....tot. Mft all. :
iDcreued clar1.q 1976 . On!' 1,586 pooplo wre ted Grilli t.U'.fiNt ida .....
or '76. . :.. ..
I loelt toi'Wl"d to oorriJal 7ft Ul4 ~. I ''\7 ~ J9Tr, 1t ~ Un ~··.,...u...,
pleaae call our oWoo or . .Jebla llaMa,· !!reM ~ D'I!P-.,_,11"• It ra 1dM. ile . ·
to appear to aanv a117 quat.iGaa, · JI.eu• oall ... l 1ll11 N _.. tllea llltliP7 W • ...
:};~}'47
Maida J. Mana
Execut1Yo Direoter
'
. .~
·.'
. ,
• •
0
.· ,
•
• (
•
PU-SCBOOL
st • .T-ea Pre-acbool
Pirat Presb)'terian
St • .&Ddr ...
Pirst UD1 tec1 Jletbodiat
Supplies--All Scboola
mrAL
4 d&JS
3 d&ya
'da7• 3 da7•
STUD:ml' AID '1'0 SCHOOLS
Public School Student Aiel
EDUCATIONAL CLASS NURSERY
Materials, bab7 eittina, etc.
'IRANSPORTATI~ •• .a.LL PROOlUMS
Drivers •• 2 full tiJae 0 1200. 110.
4 .ball tiJae 0 $100 •••
Insurance-all autoa(l aclcl.at200.)
Gaa,repair and u.intainance(inc.
add. auto)
Auto Use AllOWIIlcea
Director
Education Director
Choir Director
Youth Recreati.n/Activities Dir.
Nursing Bolle Coerd.inator
TOTAL
GmERAL .DID MKDICAL .ASSISTANCE
Medical aeai•tance
Gen eral Assistance
TOTAL
FOOD .AND CLO'l!IJNO BANKS
Poocl purchaaee
Clotbins purchaaee
'1'0TAL
CHILIIU!2i 1 S .ACTIVITIES
Muaio and ~liea for Choir
Cuapershipa, special tranaport&tion
a: driTera
TOTAL
SmiOR CITIZflll! PROC:IWtS
Sp ecial neecla for aura1na ~·
Wh eele to Meals (NEW)
TOTAL
BUILDING EIPmSE
Loan payments PU
Insurance
Cle!1ll1Ds Supplies
Trash pick up
MaintaiDance and Bapair
'rorAL
•
0
•
1 2,16o.oo
• l,62o.oo
1 l,62o.oo
1 l,62o.oo
ll1ooo.oo
• 8,020.00
• 30Q.OO
I ~.00
I 9,6oo.oo
• 2,700.00
• 6,150.00
1 1,8oo.oo • 6oo.oo • 520.00 • 750.00 I ~.oo 23,220.00
• 4,6oo.oo
1 ~1 000 1 00
• 9,600.00
• 1,500.00
11·000·00 2,500.00
• 200.00
llaJ22aOO 1,500.00
• 1,000.00
11·000·00 2,000.00
• 9.~.00
• 1,65().00 • 200.00 • 35().00
' ~·00 12,.00
0
0
0
0
0
0 ...
~
+I 120.00
Q
( •..-
+11,500 .. 200 .. 750
0
0
0
0
0
+12.450
0
0
0
0
2 • 0
0
0
0
0
.Q.
0
0
+1150.00 I • •
0
0
0 0
'+1150.00
'
. ' .• \ !
' f • ' 'r
Ol!lmW. OPIRA.'l'DIO COSTS ... ~ ·. 15&1nt. of office -au:tpact
ReeerTe tor DeW car
.. PR &Dei Bo1J111;&11t7(1noludiq Dew-
letter)q .
Poatac•
Ut1lit1es
Audit
Ottioe Suppliea
Capitol OUtJ.a;r (ott1ce equipaent)
Plmd. B&i•iDI (walk)
" . Contin8eDCIJ'
'l'O'UL
~ TO!IL ••••••••••••••••
Spec1t1~ Iitts (in &DI1 Out)
'l'CJl'AL
INC<IC
Walk Plmcia
:. IDtrea~Vallt tunda 1: DD' a
.Chuzoch ..
IDci, Buineaa,orsuisatiODa
(DOD-spec1t1ec1)
IDd. Bwlineaa,el"'UUinticma
(1Peo1t1ec1)
• ., . Memorial Q1tte
~ewocl CitT
L1 ttletoD Ci tT
Sheri daD .. Arapahoe CoUDty
'rol'AL
~
•
_.,,:; ~ ...
•
•
0
•
• 5()o.oo • delate
• ,,0'75.00
• 1,50().00
• -,920.00 • ;,so.oo
• 1,000.00 • ,oo.oo
t -.ooo.oo 1 5,733,oo
21,378,00
124,158.00
10,500,00
$'134,ti!B.OO
172,2;,13.00
t 4,8oo.oo
115,000.00
• ,,ooo.oo
llo,ooo.oo • 50().00
• 5.~.00
• ,,240.00 • 500·00
tl9.98Q.oo
$134,658,00
t•
0
c1elite
+ 515.00
+ :551.00
<11.~::?
+ ,oo.oo
+ 1,000.00
·3,247,00
2,416,00
21,520,00
'
I • •
·'
'•'
•
•
•
•
t•
•
"Wbeela to Meal•" tor ecnior oitizana at 8wediah ~·pi~, &J.)ODaOred b)' ... .. .. ,.,·
Swediab and lnter-Paith becan AI.ICII8t 15. ~h .. b&ve been bitl4-ever;·-
Monday, Wedne8d&y and Friday . An averaae ot 35--40 aCliora have ·attended
each time. Inter-Pa1.th tranaporte 18-20 of theae each clay .
.A1'ter each JDO&l, t.her~ ie eooialicin& aDd door pr1&ea, u.ually brought by
tbe eeniore, are given 1411q. In ad.ditiOD, tboM 1llbo poeeua or have made
ecaetbill6 inte~ of'tc brin& th1Dp to Mow 8D4 &bare. Hullloroua poetry
(inTari&til.e i.bcut old aae) ia of'tc read. Laat Pr1dq a -11-know guit ar
and ti~e oCIIIbo •tert&inad vith tewor1te olcl -.locliea .
It ia tlarcl not to 8CNDcl trite, but the proaram baa bHD a real wcceea in tlw
tn&Mt. HDM of the wrd. X..t week ~ ot tboMa att.ading epoke about
wb&t the~ baa ..ant to~. ODe lady N1d that ain.:e abe bepD ea~
at SIMdiah, .U baa felt pbpioall7 atzoonpr. Otben praiaed the benefit.
.. -
gained tl'al eooial CCIIltaot.
Subtle ohaDI•• in the mat&l atatee of oertaiA people can be aoi.cl." 'l'boM tlbD
earlier .. eeiiUCi ac:anb&t vitbdrDID, cMpreaaiYa or WU7.·b&n baoc.a IIDN. ~ •
cont1c1mt aDd opm. Perbapa. in an a1:lloallbiN tlbere a11 aft I"8CCICD1&ed 8D4
. .. ,., !" •
..
• •
0
. , .• I !
I
'r [
'.
•
•
•'
,~\. =t'· '"d.~~
::_,, • f"/t>-; 1 .... r.,(
r .. t·~ t:1 < :s ~J :tn.l!
'd'l CIJU'I ~.) !!e;U Ch J ::.-'
.,..,,..,;_ .. , · C7. 1 'l'n Pt'>'(,rtu-'1:'
!J ~U., 'f·<:t~~~~ Cll.ni .!
J\ra;>b..!·tJ~ Walfll.:e
f> ... J, S;J.;>•,ct. Cl i nic
3 e 4l'/h1.t!'l'
Senior Ci L Pn.grlllll8
Litt.:O <:i on Clim.c
Ot.har l"..ed.t.C'al Cliu1ce
RP.d Crot~a
Tr.l County X411.Ut.ll Dep~
At•.spahoc "'"' 1:a 1 He£lt.J I
C.u1c <..: Cl in.i es
.~.r'l.pit '•t,e ~ell :.al H":.lth
!:leni<,. 0: i. ti:run Pt·o;;ram~~
i'or t:.C !'>I Cl 1 o1iC
fl ')SPl.'-llh
'J'ri Courot:r Hes.J t h llep•. ,.
!lc s p J '·",,.
Sa nir · r.it.ize~ P r~grsn~
Ar il p~ ·\o{. <\ental bn!Ll til
Doct:.•·.,..s
"Hl CJ\ ... c ~ li o'6'.th
<...l~~l~~C·'> .::J UUC
Stt'~r,o .. f.lrl c.n .i
J entoJ· ::;1t1um P;.'\J ~_:, an~
fie,J (. Q5r.
n .... il\1.11 c\J ~
1 ~·!'F'
~!lY S l •'l.dl>-"1
N1L~· .; .; t1z; · .
!lr ... p: ~·-•' •r.~ ... 1 l le aJ t r.
.. .,•rt~·,..ltn·;
'1'\•l l.l'lTf'(,l li., ,: l,h
ci t ~'U • .1 !1..: --~~
r;:n' .. t . -:-..... ~ j •• )\.~
J\:~100! '
•,T:o "'.~. ... -·
•• , t.: ·~i r .. '
2 1 , ., ...
67
1~
4
,\
l
t
l
• ,._
0 , .
•
.. •-• •••••• 1..596 tr.:~" •lr•.l app:l'intmento tilled
;-~~l.AL;'~~~
l',;,llpi tl h d ·.)-;:&1 &: Colo. <kr-.er8.1 18
·~an c ~r ' i.t.i ca :J
Wes t S).<l e t•.c '·• O.:.mt~r l
ited Cro ss l
A.V/'..TFW: 1
Port•re Cl i.ni c 8
.lraJJ&1'o Men t al !1t~aHh 23
Wa l fare
Cra t.g l\( :1pi • a.l
AV.II.'!'RAC
'l'r·l Cour ty Spee.::b/K~ .... ring
Hos)lital'
Col 0. 5.: n . for IDl.nd
Portl!ra ;J :i m.c
Car.cer C t .lc,j c 11
:l'r i c.,un ~Y IIeuu.. De pt.
lveltare
Crai« Ho ·pit.al
P'rj ends nd S.lt
3elt'/Pr'i • nd
Red C:rns 1
Cratr-Ho ; pi ;.aJ.
Ara~~ Hel fare
~Uni~•
GOSH ·
Arapaboe l:m~l H~<J1
Arapaboe lelfare
Ooet.ore
Cre1 0 Hoe •ital
C'ar~cer 5r., · ie~y
A V.!TRAC(~1 n t &lly retarded)
GOSH
Craig Hu3! ital
AVA '!'RAe
14
26
2
3
9
1
8
24
55
l
7
4
9
l
~
9
7
7
2
4
l
7
8
Li ttlot~Jn ::linic 1
Arapahoe ' ~l far e llopt.. Sl
Hoapit3la 3
S&rtt.a !o'e r -.uee (m~n1..U illness) 14
.. ·-..... __ .. ___ .. ___ _
•••r.••••••••r••••e·. • ••• 18:J appointments
~t>'t'P ·,·j ; ·t:' ... ,,;in. t.'IO!tl "...An t~·la.:, ap~i..ntlr.f:r \v
!.F'U I' •:.·: ,1 1•'.' . 'fi, l:RI\'t:.'(S .. 1 1107 &pptJlJltmft' ta
1\,'.:J . · ........ lt:;cJG l!ledioal ll'JiO iD\JD-;;;.:;tn;;;;;tll..;;;;...:ti~ll;;;ecl;=... ____ __,
' · .
.......
•.
..
I • •
0
•
•'
-,..;_ ... :,. ~·~!, .i ·G -.· .• i::C¥,;f.f!S
:;·:.-o :,-~ ~~·:i•.' o~~i:i.~-~
Tl'l Ct.\~·!t.~· !T,,a]. i:h
·trt ..t teo ~ ;:,~.r
~~,_..·/·J·!_ nr_ ..
.'I:.H ( .'<<J-.v "'r J\s,, .·~y)
Cc:'
:.1 t •,te 1.):1 CJ.W e ::~
. .,111 f ;1 r'' llf!}~e.riment
rF'H'
·:!htu·,~h~4l
.'>dl<-old
t!ni t~d '-iay
3dlf
2.H
7
2
,·(
·'·
l
l
15
t -'
5
3
2
:.Tt <
c
o.·
OJ
c.·
0 !...:
O !'C'·.
"'.(·;;··! -·:".
IJ ..:'",: .;)0"' ~
OJ'CiA )','
<tr.C~~.:.
Orcit:"'\"L'
order·.;
:;o.t"C~-··
we~r a.~·» ~~p -.. ·~·t. . V.Cfftt
21 (.ll 'fiP.I ·>
S~.:i.ot • C _.. N !;:.l a.ms
Sle!
·~hi i d 1\'t)~nr-e
'l.l ·.'\v &:>:.f' :'!ental HE><Ll t..1
Wel f a.J.•t
3 ciiOOli!
s ... H
Food SlE;!l,') IJf'fi <'"
.l?l'l?
·Jtv, r t"~ ,.ld T!ar..!::
iJ e '1 Hl.r~ !Jel;i<.:: Ull ·.:n t
.;!!'). v ,. c. t.i • o.>n P .rooJ'&Ul."
"'·'O·i : ta:lljJ O!fi.• ~
... : .. t ~ .. l
11< -:l:."'C!o ; ;;
··o or,t~ ""'
1 oro., ...
I ()s~.>l"
----~·!-?It g ._ .. :!6 .:>r:Jar-s
.4 .~.n;·'!.t'!l
.... oree.r&
5.? orr~•z-~:t
1 Ol"Cie.c·
1 Ol"der
-~Y.. J:: '~"Yl :.,r ~,;:cu-c
~ "rf('~; ,. ) d~l '3
·, t! [(.'()Ct '\J'C,fo\1~S
-., ...
'II • I ' !t l ~ ;! 0 I
, ... J t '
~ .tr:·: ,,J ...... 1'•.!')1 !j
:<l .. '•"·"
••rd~! ,
o~-o ... .~· .,
•
0
•
• J t ',•,'\ I
; .. 1 . ' ··r '.s · r"l~lO.. ... C 'If
':!'
•\:'•
'• . r·,~ " ~ ' ;) t .·,
' ' ~. ' . ' gJ.'alll
'' . \ ·': : •.d U1 :·· . . ·oe;ran~~~
t ···· t ! l!e alth .,. :.:.a:.>2 3y!JWJ!It
,.., .... St.am.l U!f.i.l!e r .. ;1Al"t'J Lett
s ~>voole
it~~) Lt.r."""'"•
1'ri0fl'ld
Tl".i I~Q'Ml1,~ riHtl tA
Chlln:hN
:hm.ot' c 1 t j ~-om irnf';r~
Pinery Re ilt'lJ'lrent
i1kl;
Ara;>. N.w.~el ifeiLI.th
3<:1!
'l'r1 CAnln ty He ~ t.h Devt.
Churche e
·~ ... lf
Fr·;.i'n•J
1\l 'dJ,l.t.l'.c' 1-lol rd . .:1J H~r.~ l:.t·.
"-1 t.e 1
\' •· ( .. r .lJ, . .. ... . . ... _ ..
'": :.!..''_ ... ,. "' l ·•·l ·:v
.... • h • -·"'-••
•
1} orders
14 Drdt!l'tl
J orders
5 orders
7 ordel'tl
2 orders
1 order
24 o rders
6 orders
12 ord.el'll
2 Ol"dera
1 order
16 ordert~
5 ord ... r6
4 Ol'dere . order ...
1 order
!order
) o rders
12 orders
1 order
1 order
1 order
9 rooc1 Ol'd.
2 ordera
l aNer
n 01'\ ~E :!'II
1 crcer
~ 0 !'(!~~, <.
(l t"f ~~
•.
..
• •
0
-
•
•
:j•t ...
: : ~ 'J •• j. ;· .,j -,"':_ ....
]"·· ~, '~ i;~.;t.od
:,;· .. :! .1 \.'
(!t'!J."' I ·~
\-;e i'-.''f"
f ' 4 ~· _. :,; 1 .. ·: .. c
:3 ---: .• -.~~.~1 •. •
~',)Q(..J S t s•: ,•,
Dt ... \!'.IF•: •.... l J . ~::"':...
L .. l\.! ·C ·:. ..
l l fn <•L ' ·.::~
·), UEp L, ~ .. i r. 1 \.w-:t
.It "'..l t
1 ! ._1\d;
•)[t .•;.'q
-':'lfl-l":lf.~IT_ __
1 ;'• f :·-·~--\.(I .J
5 ! ~·r ,, l l • ~•
f ·:: ,j_i '"
'· . ' -'~L /
?~~~iC ~
'2 ,;, \:.it:'!'~·-·-·
) .... _1! I .. ~!;
1; '·' .'. iC:.:..'";
.) 1 ;...-r '".f. 1.
.l '3 .-.l-.11 J i~r.
·) ; .. !" :. 1 ~ -~-~
t ') I t J !i ~ t \.! .:J
·!,! f ; n · i it?~
1_ f . 't ly
__ ;\1._
'/; .l ~ i l.4i4t.· '~· I ~!l T_~('~,~
f: f .,o .1 1 l .',l
·~ ' .. :.•.,'l i~s
.. !":-~ :1.1 ia;;.
,:. ! : • r :u• l l ; '
"' .... ·:! ~·
• ,I ·~
•, ~ •• J
: ~ .. ~ ... # : • .: •• -!.:.· •• ~ •
•
• •
:·f -
?c ?tl .~t~s
~ .. ~1:/t--T i~nd
s :.;,.;c . .ts
TF'i't'
~lt ~ f.""i YE.(
::.~·l ·,,:~; ~-
;j l': -~~
.• r-.~ t -~""·(. G.::,::._
1 ]·,·.-
CLOTPJl~O ASSIST.aJiC.E
S famili e s
~5 f nm:l 1i es
I_) fllrll.l ) i ''S
l fa!'lrily
1 fillllily
12 fcun.ilj es
?.. f3J;o lie ~'
1 f '•U.i.ll!ji!
1 f :1J.Ul ~.r
'J 't·i (.;•:, ... '·i 1 !~;,.1 t ;1
Selt
14 i0111111ea
d f<Wdll.e s
l !'81:\l.ly t·~.:·.:!~ ·~.' _ . .~:.-r
1-"' I 1 I A)f.!,Jt.",
'!.'J'\ C:o-..1.-.~.Y l ;e&.)i..!l
C! n ··uhL·.;
Ct-.r. t.r t .~~ '·~ t a nk
Ji<l"'·'
Cr,J ~, ve1 : ~io&p~
Cl'\e t "i''!.' C!\t '•.
l -r M!.Hy-
l tami.l.y
3 .t'tllrli liea
l farn1liy
l fr.rtri.ly
~ f CJ1lli 1:;
r n ni ly
rw:u ly
f'm.u ly
Al~l ~). ~.,,l l' L ·• liC .. t. .. _\i '~
Ft ". ·::,,
C .• u (.\·. ... f Alllil:;
.c.::...\:J
. r J •• ' •• ~;
'
• .
I • •
0
-
-
•
o.J ... l..l:.l~:{":.J" :1•.1.w iC''-.'
~"r1 ')d :i ·.:.:.:~ ·'C t ~~
A. ..... 1-tJil ! ··.·o,! pt· ,-. ~J:
!.. --J;
y,,. ... ~ion . iJ
,cpj -t:C'I Ol t , :1.:.11 U1
!J'-:-ll~
l!"'l'r'
welf.o '('
u .,;tc<: W;:y
Vo c n ~:i tw~j ft('tl .. b
·:1-)cn rr D ~l-'~.
cttoolc
S1-Jed .1.~:l ti ~~! ~··;.·!ll~r
C!tureho>R
;.:114 ··c ,~u~
Ar;,• !'l-' t 0(; , e -~ .• r··~
Ln,).'-,.,;u.t [ :·rpl ... ,y"Ment
lF"rr'
J\ t•c<o p .. ~~·-· · -;. •"",..r, ~t'.r
l'Ql'i (!(_
•J '
: 1 ., I .• ·: l . "
-· "··· --.. n :-~
l
:l
1
..:
;
1
J
~
•
• •
·:!.'.::L~.
• •
GF.mlW. ASSISTANCE
~~<; T:i, ke '·
Eent Puyment(csnergency)
U'tH -~ t.y Bill
Hoom Rent-i night m~ergeJtC:f)
Reo!!! tent{nigl:t emergency)
f'Q nd/Gas(ni.ght E!'tel'ger.cy)
Fvoci Stc:.mp Purcl-.o<.Et'!
R'.!Tl &( etnt>r ger:c y )
G• e nnd F'ood( lllllereenoy)
G -~~ rrnr t-i·:)rl\)
G ~;; i I c1· 'o'er::)
f{~!l i.
Llaby Setting l.icens!'!
T.-11~:•~ fc,· W!l.lh
Buu ~l ".kf't( ~:.~ret-ncy)
?rn f f ! c Ji'l.'le
Gall
1!-l,j lJ t.y !hl ) f enaerg•mcy)
Uas 'rt c~ct {~r£ency)
Utill. t .t es( fT<!t'rgetiC:f )
B>JS Ti.eket:
r\;)(llft !tent ( ll~.gh I. ctneJ'(leney)
llcOID Rmt night e<~Jcre;P.ncy)
Vocattonal Hebab II \liT,, I ies
She>e!l !or work
:::.1r !"epr.J r
~~ Rent(ni p,~t ~rauncy)
Gu l"~:o work
Gne ~or work.
G e/i"ood(night anert;f'Dcy)
llae !DOlley
Math Co\U'·!J e tut..1.on
il.mt(l week Qloraencl")
Par-thl Reut.
Hoonl He.nt.(nir;ht m;arge!\cy}
Pere.on.-1 Meeda
i"oc..:! ~ l'.:mrp l'lll'chll. ••
Ilene
ll~tt:i.QI'l
Gae Money
nun '.l'i<:kc~.
l'ocxl St:tll1' J1m•ch: se
<:u Y.a:mey for work
Gne ~ttmc :; foT' wo~
G11 u 1110ney f. or work
G11.e Mon ey f-11· work
t:t.il J. t.y BHJ.
COST
$ 60.3()
$100.00
• IJ7 .67
$ 14.50
$ 14.50
$ l7.55 s 10.00
$.9().00
•. 6.00
$ 25 .00
$ 1}.79 s ~.00
• 2.25
$ 2.50
' 6o.so
' 18.00
' 3,81 $ 47.67
$ 6.00
• 96.4)
$ 41+.20
$ 1 1+.50
' 14.90 i 20.00
• 5.411
$ 20.00
• 25.50
I 5.00
~ 7.00
• 10.00
• 10.00
• 15.00
i ,a.oo s ~.oo
• 19 .. 30
1 ts.oo
$ 17.00
$ 45.50
' 2~.00 • ).00
$ ,0.?0
$ 19.00
$ 5.70
• 1 0 .00
$ 5.00
• 10.00
• 55.00
Ga ~ Mor.ey f'.Jr work $ 10.00
r'(J;ld(nitmt emet•ten-:zr) $ 12.06
a~1 tten ttn18ht llllergency) • 19.50
ROtJm Rent(nigt~t ... ruency) I 17.16
Gr s 1'"\-;;ney S 2.0)
'
'
(2j
• •
0
r a2xl
-
-
•
•.'
I': • ,. '• t~
·t.:,!~·C"r t, I".'!J ~·~
,l &J<.,.J·'-?!11/,. j
.,'c·J. r'n_..-,.
:.)l ~'lt r J ,{oaJ · :~
t' ;Dt , ')' ... ~f7ijJO )! .· .. •;{)
!!1 :!J I t .t }:l
. ! .. :-'
1
?.
1
1
1 ...
'
'·
•
• •
1 Wep.); H"r. t
1 ·~ gh't ret•\.
UQ.l~t.y Bin
Gao
a..
r:c....:.
:;'ood, at Abi!S
;. :nontl; .l."<:nt
Gl < r lb:p<:~ r
!:l.'1.1lil.(te Depostt
!Jaz;\11 :r e [IE. P:JS ! t
l:.,,ur.tlr .v
~·no,~-A\~t -:.C C::-.!"c
~~~P B
.'.Jr:-·;
~ /;r'>.('(:
' l'/.'j;.)
~ '),,0()
-$ .,,.65
• ' 12.06
$ 0_ ~/.)
! !?.,28
!-:.c•o.oo
~~ :..:~-'(')
!.lr. .. ~.oo
::._, '0 , 00
t ~-50
~ !.i.OO
:!. 50
_ .... 0<'
.. ·:"1 00
( • !
•.
..
I • •
0
-•
• •
{.
_ __;:• ·------r~.......__......._ __________ .
•
., .
o•a' • •
_r ~ ~H: ~~~-{ :•' 1l:
Y.".l , ·' r • ·' ~ ."·1• ztfl ,t'·, --... ---. . --··-· ·-..
1 f • • .\~' t l:
,. ·•l
.· r: . ·' ·: -~ ;r ,, iJ l
\!::.,~:~L "'i.."')l, :·.~:.!.i-.'~.3
\·:c l · .. , ·f' · A ~··ll': . ":•:' :.(·,
~:r"·l .. H ,. .. d ·r.::.
.s ... ~·· '""~ ).:._
t t".: r 'v· ... \,·,.1 f' n ·e
1':·:-Co·~ll J !I!< I 1 J:
......... ~· i'
•J\ ,,
r ··. \... ;'.J,.
t ; .. : .. ;-1 t ... t
·r:-~f. i·c·..:~i .ll
~ .. . '.
,.. ::. ~· :tr~~ . \""'J ,·,, :·:
.'t•; , 'I. '":: ·.' l ~ , ..... ::
!1 -~ . ~. . . ·,, ' t ll
I ' '\ ;: l L
(.
I'! t l. 1: .:. { !1 \ 1 IJ''.l. r:P:l"(\.!(,
.. '
:· .. t lt •
. ., i
:· )'( 't ,·
.......
I',O,t 'I
··.· ... _ -
... '/ ..
()j ·;.~,·!rl
Fb.
(;. t i-'.1 1 :? i . .o 1"'1 '1~·..:: t ·~J.;•n
~~~r ·-..~rJ 'dl "
!'.Je!"".srn l'.;"\t: t A l u"" \ ... •
C n lJ '~,-t .J. ~~~ !3I '•Ot::~
r c:~. t ·,) :·.::-r·
H ~P-l t<in, __ :'··:1•:.
}I f : ,J] i Ll ·'Hi
.'.u1 t"ll1 J ··i'=.·~'' :~~-~rv ) c ..
t lt·, I ~:· I ) ':i-!~UpiD (!:".i.
'i1 ;t .. t .i : 1 \..'r'lO 'i , c.t
i :J ~;r ii .:!.. r ..... r~nt t~ \
C"lJ t•.> r.,, vffi\ .~
Cib t.o .·1 ·Jr:!:" ... sh
i•lr :d .. ~·; .. ._,~. for J c·h ll F'rJltk!.l
J.!tlb lc.· c -~~~
{; .IJ ~-...
\.1 1 'ol! ~Go.
Rx
i1o:.:it.H ~ "t~,,• .. : ·; c •;• J ;, ..
\.l 1 ;.: :-:.<;:f;
l·io 1m. l .\1 •. ·. <;"ill" 1"t ,~
f~n c::Jt :t.-'I .j
~:;,o1· f-i ~··:l· , .. .;r w ·.i ~·c·r
Dent ·· ·i ,. , t'.
B~ ny
l.'·'.c!t• _,..,. ··f. 1 r
Jll'll• l :> :; 11
Col ·: e •:i~ ~,,..: .!)r.u:'!s
C i • }o'.,r.• ~.(• {>h :tf''.r.~ <11
e, t' 1-''-'-::" '~'J n c::;t,lt .. c.l
1!-~11!'i :..·.) f\.:nt..:l c.,,,,i ·•
l 'J O 1-'r.· • .::w ' 'P P.b J ,-•:c
(Jntc·•:l;r !lll! r : !.'!!
};.(Hh' l h.l ' •n 11\.0 T:,'
• H'
,., .. •.: L.,.
•. ·.:!"
:· l !f···
.•' I •'-
, .
~---
~ (!(;.50
i ~.58
~ 2.85
$ 15.92
S l;,CI)
$ -y:. 7•;;
&2'i~.oo
' ;'5.0 0
1 1.50.00
' 1?,00
• 6 1.00
I ?O,OC
$ )6.00
$ 3.65
• 2.0~,
' 6'7 .68
~ 20.(.(1
i ~.~
t 1').~0
t; ~.116
~ )2.50
• 26.00
'6s.oo
$ 2().00
$ 3(5 .60
$ C:).OO
' 12.79
$ ).20
• 5().00
G ?.O.OC
$ \'3.50
$ 6 .05
I • .., 11.~10
$ 17 .50
$ 1.95 s !(~.!· 1
5 :;o .so
;. '•'I "I"\ ....... ·J .#
~ 'l ·,o
~· :.13 ;
So 1· .. ~ ... ~
I! ,'f. ''J
~ ?4 f)(_,
-) 1 ~· ~ ... :·
·. ·. ,
• .
• •
0
f 32xl
•
• •
. •.
contini.IJ!Jd
r: .. ,,~P~ .Vt:.l J er''":P.
r.h
:.,.,.t ,·~ ': r ();' ~ ... ~t·.: ··t:J r
,., f! a'..::.. .l (·,·. ::/,t·y
r,J.-. t ,.,. ·,.,u ;:.,.11 -...u. fot·
p l"e c•.· "'"'' bai1y
,Q •. t.'1fl1Ul 'l. t4l!ls '-n:re retcn-r .'XI. tQ tU ~y .:lf."•'''i >t,;; a;vt otbPr':'. iiu •:!<:o v~ragl!l 'Jll"t-r !1~:ll•~~ore or Medio&id or ~1·h fll j n,..,:rn n-::f' •. ••.,
•
• 16,5(i
' 7.&)
· .
I • •
•
•
>·c. -s.-··u;.-,l~i
Ed\;;s ti o:na l i t t.~~~o
5-hoppJ:....-f'o. 5e..'Uo:r !'71 ':-w.-:-s
c,l~,f.x
Pl .'; .. :i \t i,) ~:-:·., ed f C<h!ll 'eJc~ ~~ 'h;,.: ~~..r
C"h.· ldr'!'! 1-. 1:.1 "·1 tees
•
• •
I • •
0
'32xl
-
•
•
•
-_Arapahoe
House
6 December 1976
May or and City Council
City of Englewood
3400 South Elati
Englewood, Colorado
De ar Councilpersons:
•
, .
•
934 E. Harvard Ave ., Denver, Colorado 80210
(303) 744-1471
.... \ .... "'r,~,
;.my I take thi s opportunity to place a request for your Council to include
The Arapahoe County Task Force on Alcohol Problems, Inc. in your forth-
coming budget for an appropriation of $5,000.00.
ilir detoxification facility, Arapahoe House, has been in operation since
February 1, 1976 and has had 919 formal admissions as of 6 December 1976.
Of that number, 227 (25\) have been Englewood residents. We expect this
percentage to increase appreciably over the coming months as a result of
a better liason with the Englewood Police Department and a growing aware-
ness of our existance on the part of Englewood residents.
This year our projected budget is $240,000.00 of which the State will fund
approxima tely eighty percent. Arapahoe COWlt"f has been asked to invest
$50,000 .00 again this year: The City of Aurora is being asked for $5,000.00
for next year m:i the City of Littleton $5,000.00. Other incane is derived
fran patient fees and donations.
We have also received a start-up grant fl'OIII the State for the establishment
of an outpat ient program which will provide monitored Antabuse and cOlmSel-
ing for court and probation referrals as well as voluntary clients. This
new service began on Octci>er 1, 1976.
There seems to be sane concern that funding for Arapahoe House involves double
or triple taxati on . Perhaps so, but it takes a certain --.mt to run a
facility like this one and if sufficient funds are not forthc:cning fraa one
source, others nust be sought. The crucial question for us all is: are we
going to treat persons with alcohol problems as criminals or as h1.11111n beings
with a treatable i llness? Will the City of Englewood join us again this
year by being a part of the answer and not part of the problem?
By way of introduction , I have just cane on board as Director of Arapahoe
House and prior to my arrival I directed the Speer detoxification program
for Denver General Hospi tal. It is my aim to help make Arapahoe House the
finest facili ty of i ts kind in the State of Colorado. We solicit your help.
sf~erely . ( . . .
(!{.J.,/ 2/f -t!
Charles Grifft th, i.S.
Director
CG/dg
•.
I . •
· . .. 1 \ !
I . . ,
'!
•
I
I
I
/
I
·-... --
~
• •
DEPARTMENT DIVISION HOUSING AUTHORITY
REVISED OOOOET
AC'IUAL AC'IUAL OOOOET ESTIMA'IE REQJEST FIRST
CLASSIFICATION 1974 1975 1976 1976 1977 RINIEW
i en I (2) OJ {II) (5) (6) (7) r I I
I PERSOOAL SElNICES I 215 267 419 383 445
I I
I
C<MU>ITIES 278 I 212 303 240 351 I CctliRAC'lUAL smv:ICES I 35 8 824 1,157 973
I
CAPITAL W1'LAY -o-I -o--o--o--o-
I
GRAND 'lUl'AL 528 486 1,546 1,780 1,769 I I
I
FUtCI'Irn The purpose of this Board is to advise in the development and implementation of
the City's Housing, Redevelopaent and related programs. The Board oversees the
filing of applications for Federal assistance to implement any programs which
have received input into the Board's plans and programs.
c:xJMm'S Due to the separate nature of the Housing Authority, it was decided to have a
contribution fro. the City to the Rousing Authority each year rather than a
separate budget under the city structure. While the City handles all bookkeeping
0
for the Authority, responsibility for funds is in the hands of the Authority.
• •
•
-
Falot 1
SUtfW{Y
,
CI'l'i' MGR.
REC<l'f-
MENDS
(ti)
r I 0
'7
. .
•
"
• •
•
DEPARTMENT
~. ACCOONI' AC'IUAL AC'IUAL
f«). CLASSIFICATIOO 1974 1975
li1 (2} (3) (Ill
~ Salaries r. wages
Part Tim! & Overtim! 203 21;2 ~3XY. Pension & Retirement 12 l!'i
ltiiXY. Insurance
~ Other
Personal Services 215 I 267
~ Office &lpplies 225 117
~.Mlter1als r. s..p. !i3 95
~ Rep. r. Mtce. ~lies
C<mllod1t1es 278 212
= Pror. Services
&hie. .. fran. Serv. 20 8 = ca.. .. Ut111ty 15
Rentals ~~ Repa1r r. Mtce.
A1d to Other ~y. = M18c. Expenses
Caltractual Service!! 35 A
I
.. l.XX Ian1 ~2XX B..tlld~ = ~a
Mlch1nery .. f'4dp.
Ca,pital Cbtlay
'n:ltal Elperditures 5!:18 .. All
• •
~
•
DIVISION HOUSING AUTHORITY
AC'IUAL ESTOO'ffi
~ 'lHRU 6/1'10
4/30/76 12/31
15) {OJ (7)
395 68 252
24 4 15
4i9 I 72 267
I
169 3 86
134 32 90
303 36 176
75
824 18 806
-n-
-o-
-o-
258
-o-
824 351 806
-0--o-
1 .5 .. 111 458 1.249
Pall 2
~ CUSSIPICATiaf
'IUI'AL EL'OOE:I'
EST. RWJESI'
1976 19 77
(lj) -(9
362 420
21 25
383 445
103 171
137 180
240 351
75 100
82~-873
258
1 .157 973
-o-
1 780 1 769
,
•
FIRm' em
RE.VIal MANAGER
(10) (11)
.
r I . •
..
...
\
•
(.
•
·-
.... --
....._.
,:.._)
1'\)
I
I
• •
DEPARTMENT
321X
Travel &
Calfereree
322X
'l\11tioos &
~
3211X
Safety
Fducat1oo
Purpose of Trip
arxl Persoo Involved
NAHRO CONFERENCE
Miscellaneous conferen-
NAHRO
CALHA
$100
50
ces
DIVISION HOUSING AUTHORITY
Transpor-
Dest1nat1oo tatioo I.OOging Food
Unconfirmed
TABlE 7
JUSTIFICATICJf (JI' EIU:ATIOOAL All> m:M71'IONAL smviCES (32XX)
• ,
•
0 •
Reg is-
tratioo Other Total
681
42
r I •
~
-..
"' I
-
. .
•
c 0 p y
Honorable James L. Taylor
Mayor, City of Englewood
3400 South Elati Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Dear J:l.m:
•
• •
December 22, 1976
en January 17, 1977, your Chamber of Carmerce will be appearing
at the City Council meeting to request a financial investment from
the City to assist the Chamber in carrying out its 1977 Program of
Work.
We realize that several fine organizations will be approaching
the City Council for financial aid, as they have done in the past.
It is our belief, however, that the Chamber request is an investment
in the economic viability of the City, an:i, as such, the investment
canes back to the City Many times over.
For your convenience, we have enclosed material for your con-
sideration prior to the January 17 meeting. If you have any questions
about this material, please call our office at 781-7838.
Sincere best wishes for the Holiday Season.
Jim Chan:Uer
President -1977
'
•.
'
• •
0
·. , . ,
•
•
•
•
0 , .
•
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE - - - - -IT DOES HAKE A DIFFERENCE
Englewood is a fine City in which to live and work, That's the message your
Chamber of Commerce conveys to people every day of the year. Whether it be
in answer to a telephone query, a letter, or in-person inquiry, the message
is the same. The business communi ty and the residents share a pride in the
City, and one of the prime missions of the Chamber of Commerce is to foster
that pride.
The Chamber of Commerce plays a part in developing and nurturing the confidence
of the business community in the City and acta as a conduit, when necessary,
between business people and city o f ficials, The relationship between the City
and the Chamber of Commerce should not be an adversary relationship, but a re-
lationship of progressive partnership, with an open line of communications.
Englewo od continues to be the focal point of business ac~lvlty in Arapahoe
County. Through the first half of 1976, 35.4~ of all retail sales dollars in
Arapahoe County were spent in Englewood, far surpassing the other cities in the
County, The business climate i mpro ved con1iderably in 1976, and Enalewood busi-
nesses enjoyed healthy growth . The growth in our industrial member firma re-
sulted in new jobs and new investment dollars in land, equipment and building~.
While it is a fact t hat many of our Chamber membera do not live in !Dglevood,
these same people readily make them1elve1 available to work on civic projects
in the City, A grea t number of these active members give many hours of time to
the betterment of Eng lewood, much more time than they are able to give to their
communities of residence. Our busines1 members certainly recornize that they
have a large stake in the City and ita prosperity.
Serv ing as a Community Information Center i1 a prime responsibility of your
Chamber of Commerc e. Much of the information that out-of-town visitors and
c orrespondents receive about the City of Englewood comes from the Chamber office
staff and from the Community and Business Facta 1ectiona of our Annual Business
Directory. As in past years, the Chamber will distribute )GOO copie1 of the
1977 Business Directory in response to written requests for information about
the Community, in public offices, and to visitors to the Chember office. There
is no charge for this Directory, regarded aa a public service Of your Chamber
of Commerce.
ENCJLEWCDD/UNIT.D BUBUAIIAN CHAM •• A C. CCWIM•AC2
180 weet Girard Avenue. Englewood. Colorado 80110 Phone C303l 781-7838
. , •
I • •
0
.• I !
' 'r
-
•
. -
•
•
• •
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE -• ---IT DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE Page 2
The Chamber o f f ice is a publtc office and visitors are made welcome at all times.
We make the most of every opportunity to tell visitors about Englewood's out-
standing shopping facilities, knowing that their shopping dollars spent here con-
tribute to the City's economic well-being. Repeat visitors to our office and
letters we receive help tell us we're getting the job done,
A number of new small businesses have been established in Englewood this year.
Some o f these new businesses located in Englewood after talking to Ch.mber members
or visiting with ou r Chamber staff. Our Business/Economic Development Council has
spent considerable time in 1976 1tudying and planning methods to attract new busi-
ness firms to the City. This Council has been established as an on-going program,
and in early 1977, a brochure will be printed for mailing to pro1pects, Although
land for commercial and light industrial facilities is in short supply in Engle-
wood, the Chamber will do ita utmo1t to bring in new business for available
building sp ace,
As in most typical suburban chamber• of commerce, our membership consists princi·
pally of small businesses, paying the minimum membership investment each year.
Although operating expenses have increaaed, our Board of Director• haa decided
not to incr ease minimum membership dues, and we have been able to attract new
members th i s year to bring our membership back to the 500 member mark. A few
lareer businesses and the City of Englewood, with their inve1baent1, have kept
our Chamber o f Commerce a viable organization,
Your Chamb er of Commerce respectfully reque1t1 a 1977 Inve1tmant by the City of
Englewood of $10,000 to help us carry on activities in behalf of the community and
its resident and business citizens during the new year.
'
•.
'
I • •
0
. , f
•. ,
(
•
•
0 -
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN
A BILL FOR
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 3, 4, S(a) AND S(b) OF
CHAPTER 1, TITLE XIII, OF THE 1969 ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL
CODE, BY CREATING A NEW CLASSIFICATION FOR "TAVERNS"
FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING THE OCCUPATIONAL TAX
THEREFOR.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUN CIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
That Section 3, Chapte r 1, T i tle XIII, of the 1969
E.M.C., is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (h)
thereto, as follows:
13-1-3: CLASSIFICATIONS
The business of selling at retail any three
point two percent (3.2%) beer, malt, vinous or
spirituous liquor, other than medicinal liquors
for beverage purposes, is hereby defined and
separately classified as such occupation for the
purposes of this section as follows:
Section 2.
(h) CLASS "H" OPERATOR: ALL OPERATORS
LICENSED TO SELL MALT, VINOUS, OR
SPIRITUOUS LIQUORS BY THE DRINK ONLY
TO CUSTOMERS FOR CONSUMPTION ON THE
PREMISES, WHERE SANDWICHES AND LIGHT
SNACKS ARE AVAILABLE FOR CONSUMPTION
ON THE PREMISES.
That Section 4, Chapter 1, Title XIII , of the 1969
E.M.C., is hereby amended to read as follows:
13-1-4: AMOUNT OF FEE
There is hereby levied and assessed for each
CONSECUTIVE TWELVE (12) MONTH PERIOD ealenear-yeer
er-rrae~ienal-year an occupational fee upon the
.. _,
-1-
\
••
I • •
0
. , ·. '
• . .
Section
E.M.C.,
•
•
• t•
•
b u siness of sell i ng three point two percent (3.2%)
b eer, malt, vinous or spiri tuous liquors, except
medicinal liquors, within the City, as said occupa-
t ion has been classified as follows:
Class of OEerator Fee
For all Class "A" $650.00
For all C l ass "B" 250.00
For all Class "C" 300.00
For a ll Class "D" 300.00
For all Class "E" 250.00
For all Class "F" 250.00
For all Class "G" 400.00
FOR ALL CLASS "H" 650 .00
3.
That Section 5, Chapter 1, Title XIII,
is hereby amended to read as of the 1969
13-1-5:
(a)
(b)
follows:
PAYMENT OF FEE
Such fees shall be due and payable to
the Director of Finance ON OR BEFORE
EACH CONSECUTIVE TWELVE (12) MONTH
PERIOD, and shall be delinquent
thirty (30) days thereafter.
Upon receipt of said fee, the Director
shall issue a receipt showing the name
of the person paying the same, the annual
twelve (12) month period for which the
fee is paid and location of the place
of busin ess, which receipt shall at all
time during said year be kept posted in
a conspicuous place on said premi ses.
-2-
· .
..
• •
0
'32xl
-
I
(
(
(
•
•
• , .
•
'·
-
Introduced, read in fu11 and passed on first readin g on t hs 3rd day of January, 1977.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 5th day of January, 1977.
ATTEST:
I, William 0. James, do hereby certify that the above and forego ing is a true, accura te and complete copy Of a
Bill for an Ordinance, introduced , r ead in full, and Passed on first reading on the Jrd day Of January, 1977.
ex Off~cio City Clerk -Treasur er
-3-
'
• •
0
......
[
(
(
•
•
•
•
Introduced, read in ful l and passed on first reading
on the 3rd day of January, 197 7.
Publ ished as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 5th day
of January, 1977.
MAYOR
AT TEST:
ex offi c~o City Cle rk-Treasure r
I, William D . James, do hereby certify that the above
and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a
Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed
on first reading on the 3rd day of January, 1 977.
e x off ~cio City Clerk -Tre asurer
-3-
• .
'
• •
0
f
-
(
•
•
•
• t•
•
MEMO RANDUM
To : Kar l Nollenberger, Ass istant City Manager
From : William D. James, Director of Finance
Date: November 29, 1976
Subject: Liquor Code
The state has a new classification titled "Tavern Licen se" for the sale
of liquor on the premises. The City does not presently have this type
of classification in the Municipal Code. Tavern licenses should fall
under Class A (13-1-3); and the amount of fee should also be the same
as for a Class A license, which is $650.00.
The state has a 1 so changed the effective dd te of a 1 i cense from the
calendar year to the anniversary date (date when the license is
approved). I would recommend that the City Code be changed to
correspond with collection of the City's occupational tax on the
anniversary date rather than on January 1 of each year. This
would simplify our proce ssing of liquor licenses; and we would
have to handle each license only once, whereas now under the new
state law and our present code we will have to process each license
twice.
...
~
William D. James
Di re ctor of Finance
WOJ/kv
• .
I . •
0
'a2x
•
•
0
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCILMAN ~~~~~~~~~~------------------
A BILL FOR
AN ORD I NANCE AMENDING SECTION 6 , CHAPTER 4, TITLE XV, OF THE
1 969 ENGLEWOOD MUNICIPAL CODE, INCREASING SEWER CONSTRUCTIO N INSPECTION SERVICES.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Sect ion 1.
That subsection (c) of Section 6, Chapte r 4, Title XV,
o f the 1969 E.M.C., is hereby amended to read ·as follows:
15-4-6: CONSTRUCTION OF SEWERS; EXTENSION OF MAINS;
COSTS; INSPECTION
(c) Quality control of privately constructed
collection mains feeding the City treat-
ment plant shall be assured by on site
inspectors provided by the City of Engle-
wood Utilities Department, which a gency
shall include the ·monitoring of coll ection
main construction and the lamping of mains
when construction is complete. Charges
for these services shall be billed to the
respons ip le con tractor per-~he-fe%%evift~
sehed~le AS FO LLOWS:
(1) Inspection: (one man) weekdays $ 8T99fhr~
12.50/hr.
AFTER NORMAL DUTY HOURS, WEEKENDS
AND HOLIDAYS $lc~99fhr~
18.75/hr.
-1-I • •
0
f
•
•
•
•
•
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on th ~ 3rd day of January, 1977.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the 5th day of January, 1977.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ex offic~o City Clerk-Treasurer
I, William D. James, do hereby certify that the above
and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of a
Bill for an Ordinance, introduced, read in full, and passed
on first reading on the 3rd day of January, 1977.
ex off~cio City Clerk-Treasurer
-2 -
• .
'
• •
0
'
-
•
•
•
•
• •
'5b
MEMORANDUM
TO: Karl Nollenberger, Asst. City Manager
FROM: C. B. Carroll, Jr., Director of Utilities
DATE: November 9, 1976
SUBJECT: Charges for Sewer Inspection Service
PROBLEM: To identify costs specifically associated with the sewer construction
quality control program and to ca l culate an hourly rate of charges for 1977.
FACTS: l.
2.
3.
4.
Inspection hours billed Nov. 1975
Vehicle cost per Toyota for 1977:
Hourly cos t {1977) for Inspector:
Hourly cost {1977} for Asst. U• I l.
through Oct, 1976: 1070
$852.
$8.53 Incl. Fringes
Director: $13.22 Incl. Fringes
ASSUMPTIONS: 1 . Assistant Director spends 4 hr/wk on the sewer construction quality
control program including the review of plans and that this a c tivity
fluctuates in proportion to the hours spent by inspectors in the
field.
DISCUSSION :
RECOMMEND:
/fm
2. Clerical activities associated with the program requires about
2 hr/mo.
3. The two Toyotas are used 804 of the time for this program,
1. Vehicle Costs:
$852/yr/vehicle x 2 x .80 •
2 . Office Costs:
Clerical: 2 hrs x 12 mos. x $6.70 s $ 161.
Review of Plans ~ Supervision:
4 hrs x 52 wks. x $13.22 • $2 ,750,
3. On Site Insp. Costs:
1070 hrs x $8.53/hr. •
Total Co st {assuming 1070 hrs.)
4. $13,401 t 1070 hrs • $12.52/hr
ANNUAL
$1,363.
$2 ,911.
$9,127.
$13,401.
That the 1977 charges for sewer construction inspection service be
increased to $12.50 an hour •
I • •
0
r a2xl
•
•
•
•
0
•
RESOLUT ION NO. ___ z ___ , SERIES OF 1977
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY
AS BEING REQUIRED FOR THE SENIOR CITIZENS RECREATION CENTER
AND AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION THEREOF.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNC~L OF
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
That the City Council hereby designates the following
parcels of land situated in the City of Englewood, County of
Arapahoe, State of Colorado, as being needed for public use
fo r the development of the Senior Citizens Recreation Center.
PARCEL NO. 1:
The West 60.0 feet of Lots 10-12, Block 3,
Premier Addition,
City of Englewood,
Arapahoe County,
State of Colorado.
PARCEL NO. 2:
The East 65.0 feet of Lots 10-12, Block 3,
Premier Ad di tion,
City of Englewood,
Arapahoe County,
State of Colorado
Sect~on 2 .
That the City Council hereby finds and determines that the
sa id parcels of land are needed and required for public use
an d purposes, to-wit , for the development of the Senior Citizens
Rec reation Center for the City of Engelwood, Colorado .
Section 3.
That the City Council hereby designates and authorizes
the City Manager, or his designee to conduct for, and on behalf
-1-
'
I • •
.......
(
•
• '
•
•
• ..
of the City of Englewood, negotiations in good faith for the
acqu isition of said real property, including all such efforts
to acquire the same through purchase as may be required by
law to be made prior to the institution of eminent domain proceedings.
Sect ion 4.
That if the compensation to be paid for the parcels of
land cannot be agreed upon by the parties interested , or in
ca se the owners of said parcels of land is incapable of con-
senting, or his name or residence address is unknown, or
if he is a non-resident of the State, then the City Attorney
is hereby authorized to institute and prosecute to conclusion
such proceedings as are available, pursuant to law, for the
exercise of the power of eminent domain.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 3rd day of January, A.D., 1977.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
ex officio city Clerk-Treasurer
I, William D. James, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
of the City of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that
the above and foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy
of Resolution No. __ 2 __ , Series of 1977.
ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer
-2-
· .
I • •
0
-
• •
•
'ro
FRCJ.1
DATE
•
0
•
fuyor Taylor and Members of City Council
Andy ~Cown, City Manager
October 21, 1976
Sl.JaJECT : Special AssesSJrent Hardship Cases
5 D
As you may recall, a few years ago the City Council was
interested in a program concerning hardship cases for special
assesSJrent districts. I believe the Council ultinately re-
jected the program because it was thought that the program
would have to include ;u1 •>utright g ''Attt to hardship cases as opposed to longer tenn loan payoffs.
In a recent conference program, the Colorado Springs program
was described by their staff (copies of program enclosed).
It would appear that their program would satisf'y I!Ost of
the objectives of the Council When they reViewed the effort
a couple of years ago. If the Council is still interested
in a program of this nature, perhaps they would like to
ask the City Attorney to investigate the program further as it ates to our City.
I { (};1 ~ :"{irL{r~.,
Cit~r
AWsb
cc: Bernard V. Bera.n:iini, City Attorney
Karl Nollenberger, Assistant City Manager
Kells Waggoner, Director of Public Works
William Jamas, Director of Finance
Enclosures
..
I . •
0
.. ,
-
,
•
•
,. .
•
0 , .
•
Progra:n f or Hardship Cases in Improvement Districts
In late 1973, the City Council approved an ordinance providing for
r e l i e f a s sistance to those citizens in Improvement District who can be
classified as hardship cases. To the best of our knowled~e, this is the
only program of its kind in t he c ountry. The program is operated according
to the following regulations as established by the ordinance.
When it has been determined that a property owner has such a mar~inal
income that he cannot pay the lev i ed assessment, or that he will probably
default on the payments, the assessment may be paid in full by an advance
from the Surplus and Deficiency Fund. Such persons must sign .an affidavit
agreeing to reimburse the fund by making mon thly payments to the City
Treasurer. The payments cannot be less than $5 and must be in sufficient
ooount to repay the amount advanced within a 25 year period. An annual
interest rate of 3 percent is charged on the unpaid balance.
The ordinance also provides security for repayment of the advance.
This i1 accomplished by having the property owner execute an instailment for
the repayment of the sum advance, plus interest, and secured by a Deed of
Trust to the property. The note and Deed of Trust provide for the entire
outstanding balance to be paid upon the death of the property owner, or
when there is a sale or transfer of the property.
A further provision states that when the financial status of a property
owner changes or when he has misrepresented his financial etate, the entire
asse s sment beco .. a payable on 60 days notice.
Review of the applications for hardship relief will be done by a
Hardship Committee, composed of the Mayor, the City Clerk and the City
Auditor. Although the maximum income limits for eligibility are let by the
City Council, the Committee will make the final decisions on individual
eligibility.
The City uaes the following criteria for determining eligibility for
relief from assesement.
1. The applicant must be an individual or family who ovna and occupies a one
dwelling unit.
2. The applicant must be unable to secure the necessary funds with which to
make the payment required by the ordinance levying the assessment against
his property •
3. The applicant must be able to pay the asaesament if payments are extended
over a period not to exceed 25 years.
4 . The applicant must have monthly net income from all sources which does
not exceed limite aet by the Hardship Committee and approved by the City
Council.
5. J If the Deed of Trust securing repay.ent would not have first priority,
then the applicant must demonstrate that he hal equity in the property
greater than the amount of the asseeeaent.
I • •
0
r 32xl
•
('
. l •I
,.
T l). City Counc·il
•
0 , .
•
CITY OF Cuu:JRAOc . SF'r<.~;G s
COLORADO -INTI\R • OFFICI! HBI'IOB"NDI'~I
Dolt : May fl, '''76
p.,,.,: Hoh~..•rt P .ar ·!.:f•J ·, City C!E'rk
Hardnhip Criteria --Spt;cinl lmprovcmc:nt Oistric ·t!.
.1 :;:1 r·lwd fnl' you1· CO!IS1 •.1crM inn anJ approval nrl" copic·s 0f thE: ·pr ~;sen I an d
Si ·,q:,•st"d financial eligii.Jili :) g r.ir!.•l~rtc,.; for hards hi p lr;;f!tS drarte d by tht·
Crtv i\ttf'rney 's Ol'nce and (jpprc,ved by the !f3rdBhip Committet>, As in the
p :t:,;t l.!:t!dt' gui c!dim·~ nre based · n::»l y on th~ g•.t irlclim·~ l'S tablishec.J for
Lq;?l Sc ·r·,·it.:f':> l•) lfJ.::\\', The L'.ty has, however, allov.·~rl an addit lc.na l
llh' •tnt:-or approximately :~60. 00 pe t · 111 onth . The nwmht:>r :' fJf the Hanl&h•p
l 'ommittc e beht!~-~ tlaet.t' new guide:i n~..•s are ut>c~t:sary in orc.J~::r to lc?cp
pa -:..: with .:ost nf living increases.
lrr ndr'tt:on, it i,; :•ug~cstc ·d t ha t pt '•l·r~du !"cr : llr· c~;t ahli.';~tt.'d for lhost• who r:o
,.,,· ''1t'l'l thr· I bane tal •·hgll)ility c;uide liuc s , hut arc hit ·.•. ith a:-, e~::~pcciall o:
ht gh a ssf.'~snrent. 1 he~c lnl.!ivirlu :.Jl' mit!ht l.c allowed a net ineoml: inc:reo:.:-'c
of $100 lor E>a<!: ~!, 0011 t· · lhr c~~s ~:.,.;m C'nl. If thi !' d.t.ldi:ionaJ $1{10 J.~<:C' mt'n th
hrin,.c: tht> p:n LJ •::i lhin the guidelin~s. he, too, would be eligible for l :.n•l•;h1p
(' . t•'1Rirlrratior.. F'u r cx:un ple, a person whose in :·r.•mc· lv:c.~h. $500 per month
an:l h ·u; no d•:pcnril''!t ~ \\vull not q :•ali fv for considt!ratit.:m. U his n~;sessmrnt
Wa "' ~:~. 0 'J 0, hOW('V<'r , th:•t woul.J r:1i !o t:' the l'llgil-il:·v r·C'qllirt'ntf'nt lu ~,j:J4. lC
:u ,d h!' ,·(·ll ld lhl•n quahf~: fu::-:.1:-;;;isl.'lncc
•
:..:,nct 'rt· ..•
. -l t'
.·
I I) .· , I •
I ' .. ' ''( .-, . J '( r ' , -t .. ' /"
!:1.'!3F.HT P.'\ IUd.::R
C it,\' ('lerk
l:l' J.DH :I'lf
\ .. ..-
-. ----··-..... ··---... _ .. __ ----·--·--··--·-·-··---------... --·---·-
"
I • •
0
-I t
3
J
•
(
•
•
0
•
------------
. .
Inc. or.v ·
S:.!55. 83
:H7.5Q
379.17
-l-\0. 8~
so:!. ~.o
564.17
2 :d. 50 fur each
additional per»on
. . ,
•.
I. •
-
·I
(
(
•
•
• I•
·. •
2
4
1.\ :Jcf .36R. :33 p <'l ' :·t,•n:il lOt' 1:ach addition,,! family tu~·mber1
Income
$284. Ju
35?. '>0
-t;.;o. 83
489. 16
55? .. )0
i l ,'.i .iilOO. i.H.• pc·r month for e:lch 'ldditiomd '1 , GOO. 00 ~l~~;< ,;sml'nt)
•.
I • •
0
· . . . ,
•
• '
•
r
•
, .
•
IN THE !STRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE
COU NTy Of' ARAPAHOE
STATE Of' COLORADO
C~vil Act1on No . ~4-'-'.")
THE CITY OF ENGLDiOOD,
COLORADO, A Mun1c1pal Cor[l n r~tj n n ,
• Div . __
vs . STIPULA TION
CARL RYB!::RG,
Defendant .
COMES NOW th~ parties named hereinabove and stlpu late and
agree as fo llows, th at ,
WHEREAS, ~he laintiff is desi r ous Of hav1
owned by th e Defendant r emov t e Du>ld ng
3228 South Clarkson, Englewood, Col or ado , at the earl>est posalble
time, considering the necessary factors t o t he Defendant , weath e r,
etc., for such removal, a nd
h~ERLAs , it i s the des1re Of the De f endant to remove th~
bu1ld1ng lmprovements located upon such real property within a
rea sonable time period , and,
WHEREAs, it is the mutua! desire Of al l partie• to amicably .
settle t h eir differences having given rise to this action, it is,
there tore,
Mutually ag r e ed that 1n cons>deration fo r lhe covenants and
ag reements as here1naf ter set forth , as follows:
1. That the Defendant shall demolish, tear down, and remove
•J-evct i·"A..., .,~~
the bu1lding lmprovements1j l oc ated at 3228 South Clarkson, Engle-
/ wood , Colorado within 90 days from December 10, 1976.
2 . That such remova l of such lmprovement shal l be at the ~ole ex pens e of the Oe fend•nt .
( )
I
,._
'
I • •
0
-
•
• (t
•
•
0 I• -
IN THE DISTRICT COURT 1N AND FOR TH£
COUNTy OF ARAPAHOE
STATE OF COLORADO
C~vil Act1on No . _2L 4-'·~.~~ ~ Div . __
THE Cl TY OF ENGLEWOOD ,
OOCOAA<>o, > '""'o'~' , Co r pnrA t j nn .
vs . STIPULA Tl ON
CARL RYB J::RG ,
Defendant .
COMES NOW the part~es named her e ~nabov e and stipu late and
ag r e e as follows, t hat ,
WHE REAS, th e ~l a~ntif f is desirous of haVln the building
e tc ., for such removal, and
time , considering the nec essary f ac t o rs to the Defend a nt, weather,
3228 South Clarkson , Englewood, Colorado , at the earl~e st poss~ble
reasonable time period, and,
bu~ld ~ng ~mprovements located upon such r ea l property w~th~n a
h~EREA s, it is the des~re of t he Defendant to remove th•
therefore ,
settle the1 r d~fferences having given rise to thio action , i t is,
WHER£As, jt is the mut ua l desire of al l partieo to amicably .
Mutually ag reed that 1n conslderatlon fo r the covenan to and
l . '!'hat the Defendant shall demoli oh, tear dcx.-n, and remov e
• J--e-Vc/ ;·-""'-. .., ~Dt.-..£"l
1 the bu~ld~ng ~mprovement~jlocated a t 3228 Sou t h Clarkson, Engle-
agreemen ts as he re~nafter set forth , ao followot
/ wood , Colorado within 90 days from December 10, 1976.
2 . '!'hat such remova l of such ~mp rov ement shall be at the
sole expense Of the Defenddnt.
·'
• •
0
-
•
•
•
•
• •
J . Thae all uc~r1s or ma ter1a1 caused by such removal
Lime> p<·uod af crcs~ld ot tilc sole c::p<'nsc o f the Def<'n dan t.
act1v1ty , shall he rPmovpd from th S>ld prc is ~s w1eh1n sa1d
4 . In t ~e even t the Defendant shal l fai l to remov e the
sa1d bu1lding lmprovem~n ts as he re inauov~ set forth in para-
gra phs 1 anu J, Wl thin th~ t ime p e riod as her einabove set fort h ,
th~ Pl o1n tlff moy , Wlthout further notice , g o u pon SOl d premi ses
the Ccur t may en t er judgm~nl thereon Wlt h out furthe r hearing
Pl a i nt1ff ntdy s ubmit a cost bi ll therefo r e to the Court and
d<'molit•on or remo vo l shall be> bourn~ b;· the Defen da nt and the
not1c e Lo the Defendnn t. In s u c h event, the cost of such
ch, ''"-ic,, c, "Lilcrwis"' os it shall see fi t, withou t addit ional
such demoli tion activity.
Plaintiff shaH be limited to actu a l costs incurred by it .i n
in this matter . The only requirement herein being that the
5 . Thi s Stipulation i s made .a Lh the express intent ot
within whlch t o <'ff <~t removol of such building improvements .
the part1ea to afford the Defendant a sufficient time per1od
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the partiea hereto have aet forth their
reape ctive hand s and seals this _____ day ot December, l976.
APPROVED AS TO FORM :
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO,
A Municipal Corporation
BY:·--------------
-2 -
...
.
'
..
I
• .
• •
0
(
•
• •
•
7'0:
FROM:
DATE:
•
0
•
Andy McCown, City Manager
William James, Director of Finance
December 29, 1976
6 A
SUBJECT: Grant Applications for Local Publ i c Works Capita l
Development and Investment Act 1976 Title I
The City has received official notice from the Regional Directo r
of the Economic Development Administration the status of 11 of the
12 grants submitted. The follo~i~g 11 projects ~e not approved for funding.
1. North Central III Storm Drainage
2. Library Expension
3. Rehabilitation of Water Transmission Hains
4. Water Main Improvements
5. Joint Fire Training Facility
6. South Broadway Widening and Median Improvements -Yale to Floyd
7. Storm Drainage High School Basin
8. Clarkson Street Improvements
9. South Broadway Median Improvements -Quincy Avenue to Belleview
10. Lebow Bridge at Big Dry Creek
11. South Platte River Drive Bridge -Little Dry Creek
The only application outstanding is for the Filterback Wash.
According to an article in the neWspaper which stated preliminary
approval of all funds available it appears that this project also
will not be funded.
All applications submitted by the City were in order. The main
reason the City did not receive any funds is that our unemployment
figures were relatively low compared to other cities in the oietro
area. Unemployment was the main factor for ranking projects and
no consideration was given to the need or impact of the projects in a COlmtUnity.
There is a possibility that this Act will be extended or a similar
Act be introduced in 1977.
v~~ William D. s
Director o Finance
WJ/sb
cc: Karl Nollenberger, Assistant City Manager
'
I • •
0
· . .•
-
(
• •
•
;-•
• I•
•
6 B ~~ ~ MEMORANDUM
TO: Andy McCown, City Manager
FROM: William D. James
DATE: December 2 9, 1976
SUBJECT: Local Public Wo r ks Title II Grant Receipts
The City of Englewood has received the first and sec ond quarter grant
payments of the Local Pu blic Works Act, Title II. The g rants are
intended to be used main ly for employing personnel in QXisting ser-~ The funds received must tie appropriated or obligated within six months after receipt.
These funds received from Title II can be used fo~: l) continuing
exis ting services; 2) expanding existing services; 3) construction
proj ects of an emergency nature. fhis ·grant may also be used for
capital equipment replacement provided prior approval is received from the Office of Revenue Sharing.
!We are estima ting that the City will receive between $11,000 and ~4,000 of Title II funds.
I would recommend that since the intended use of these funds are for
employing personnel that the monies be appropriated to either extend-
ing tempora ry employment of some of the CETA employees of the City ,
or hiring o f a temporary animal warden, or a similar use of this nature.
WDJ/cg
cc: Karl Nollenberger
. ,
'
I . •
0
·' \ !
I
~
-
•
•
• ,_
• •
MEMORA , ll"\ 1'0 THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARD! G RECOMM I:: 'J)\1'10 ..
OF TilE P .\1\~S & RI:.CRL\TlON CO 11\1lSS lON
DATE: November ll , l 976
' BJlCT : NAMI G OF SENIOR C lTlZE RECRE TlON CE T R
That I •l!!lewood Ci ty ( uncil con -.1,kr naming th new
Se nior •.:itill:'n Recrea fion Center the M \LLL Y
CJ:: TI :\INlAI. CE TJ R in ho nor 1 Elsie Malle\'.
By orde r of the Eng l ewood Parle s Recreation
Comm ission
~L£~
Edith 1:-. Roma n s , Recording Secretary
. '
• .
'
I . •
0
'32xl
' '
•
•
•
, -
•
t•
•
6 D
MEM ORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of Englewood Ctty CouncU
FROM: Andy McCown, City Manager
DATE: November 22 , 1976
At your last CouncU meeting, you asked for a report conce$1Dg previous
acttons on the naming of the Senior Center. Thta action wu tn response to a
recommendation from the Parka and Recreation Commtaston to name the
Santor Center, the Malley Centennial Center. The enclosed ooptea of Counctl
meeting minutes and letters relate to thta subject. Since there are a number
of these attachments which relate to different Counctl meettnp chronologically,
I wtll attempt to keep them in order for you by coding and referencing them.
At the September 15, 1975, Council meeting, Resolution No. 44 (Exhlbtt A)
was passed whtch offered Councll endorsement for the Englewood Centemltal-
Btcentenntal Foundation (E. c. B. F.) project of a Community Center. Thts
resolution was passed as a msult of the request by the E. C. B. F. for Counctl
support of a community project for the E. C. B. F.
Subsequently, the Council had a study sesalon with the E.C.B. F. in November,
1975. At that time, a new project wu propoaed, the Senior Recreation Cater.
Various aspects of that project were dtacuased. While we have no record of
study sessions, it was the ataff's impression that the CouncU did not eDdorae
a memortaltzatloo plan for the naming of the Center as wu requested by the
E. C.B . F. in the letter of November 4 (Exhibit B), under pdnt number 5. At
the next Counctl meeting, on November 17, the minutes (Exhibit C) renect
that a motion was pasaed unanimously by Councll which changed the words in
point number 5 from ''The center name to be open for memortallzatton by
Individuals or bualneaaes that may wlah to donate in exceaa of $50,000." to
"Portions of the center may be open for memortaltzatton by lndlvtduall or
bualneasea that may wlah to donate in excesa of $50,000." It appeara to be an
oversight that the last aentence In that paragraph wu not eliminated.
The December 1, 1975, Councll meeting minutes (Exhfbtt D) abow the paasage
of Resolution No. 62 (Exhibit E). The resolution was requeated in the motion
Qf the November 17th CouncU meeting and includee a Section IS u per the
motion on November 17. Thia ta the last resolution on thla aubject matter
and ta currently in effect.
•
• •
-
•
•
•
•
t•
•
Mayor and Members of Councn
November 22, 1976-SENIOR CENTER NAME MEMORIALIZATION
Page 2
~ .. . :;· ~ On De cember 8 , 1975, the Councll received a letter from the E. c. B. F.
(Exhibit F) which speaks to the memorialfzattw ptaa 'fero tlttt flllif 1 ....-t .' ·
The naming of the Center as a memoriallzatton for $50,000 .ls not mentioned
in the letter as it was in the previous letter from the E. C. B. F. On Decem-
ber 16, according to the minutes (Exhibit G), CouncU adopted the memorial-1zat1on plan by motion,
' At the January 5th meeting of the Councn, a recommendation (Exhibit H)
from the Parks and Recreation Commtssion was received concerning the
naming of the Senior Center as the Centennial Center for Senior Citizens.
I assume that they decided on this name since the possibUtty of namtng it after
a contributor had been previously rejected. The Councu tabled this recom-
mendation "untU some time in the future" (Exhlbit I), Todate, it has not been removed from the table.
At your November 15, 1976. meeting you received the recommendation
(Exhibit J) concerning the naming of the Center as the Malley Centennial Center.
r hope this chronology is helpful to you in making your decision.
si;~erely ,!),
1 /A · /}t_d \&'~ ceo$~
City anager
AMcC/p
Attachments
CC : Karl Nollenberger, Assistant City Manager
B. V. Berardtni, City Attorney
· . . ,
•.
I . •
-
•
•
•
• "' -
-
~ RESOLUTION NO. 44, SERIES OF 1975
I I
A RESOlUTION APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A COMMUNITY CENTER
FOR THE CITY OF ENGlEWOOD AS ITS OFFICIAl CENTENNIAl-BICENTENNIAl PROJECT;
APPROVING THE TEMPORARY EMPlOYMENT OF ElWIN D. BATCHElOR. A P~FESSIQNAL
MONEY-RAISER, TO SUPERVISE THE ENGlEWOOD CAMPAIGN TO RAI$£ FUND$'FOR 'SAID PRO~ECT; AND DIRECTING THE SALAR Y FOR SAME TO COME FROM VOlUNTARY ·CONTRI~ BUTION S AND FUNDS FROM THE CITr.
-WHEREAS, the Englewood Centennial-Bicent ennial Committee was organized by the City Council of the City of Englewood, Colorado, to
provide direction and methods, in conjunction with State and Federal
Agencies, to celebrate not only the Nation's 200th Anniversary, but also the lOOth Anniversary of the State of Colorado; and
WHERE AS, the Englewood Centennial-Bicentennial Committee has
recommended that the official project adopted on behalf of the Cfty of .
Englewood for said celebration, be the construction of a Community Center; and ·
WHEREAS, it is desirable to secure financing for such project through voluntary contributions of residents of the City who support the Communi ty Center concept, ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOlVED BY THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORAD O, as follows:
Section 1.
That the City Council hereby approves and adopts the construc-
tion of a Commun ity Center for the Ci~ of Englewood as its official · Centennial-Bicentennial project.
Section 2.
Tha t for every one ($1.00) dollar of voluntary contribution received by the City of Englewood, the City Council shall appropriate
three ($3.00) dollars for land acquisition and construction of said .
Center; and that all of said funds shall be held separately and apart ·
for said purposes. The City's appropriation shall be due in the year in which the land is acquired •
Section 3.
That the City Council hereby approves the temporary employ-
ment of Elwin D. Batchelor, a professional fund-raiser, to supervise
the Englewood campaign, and to secure voluntary contributions, and
hereby authorizes the City Manager to dispense the necessary funds for
the salary of said Elwin D. Batchelor for the months of September, October, November, and December, 1975.
• • I
A.
• •
·' I !
I
'!'
-
.. . ·'
';
I
I
•
•
•
0 I~
•
Section 4.
It fs hereby further directed, and resolved, that the salar,y
· of said Elwfn D. Batchelor shall come from voluntary contrfbutfons, and
the City of Englewood shall pay any portion of safd salary that fs not paid by said contributions. •
Section 5.
In the event that for any reason M a"'MIIIMI
said donated funds shall be returned to the contrfbu
have been appropriated by the City sha 11 be designated as t.miiDDII"'O!!...,I
surplus funds, and subject to other appropriation by Cfty Counc
ADOPTED AND APPROVED THIS 15th day of S~telllber.' 197$ •.
ATTEST:
~~7'§:2.; ~.
I, Wfllfam D. James, ex offfcfo Cfty Clerk-Treasurer of the
Cfty of Englewood, Colorado, hereby certffy that the above fs a true, accu~ate,, and complete copy of Resolution No. 44, Serfes of 1975 •.
~asur~
'
-2 -
. . ,
•
'
··.
I . •
0
· .
-
•
•
•
--'
r ·
/_.,;# ,vr
,_ •
I• -
s.
-~·.~\:.~
' ' "•
NbYambar 4, 1975
Maytr J-.s L. Taylor'
Mlllblrs of the City CbmcU
3400 South Elati
En]lewcoc!, Oll.orado 80110
Daar Sin:
·~· ''II>.'.
~· ... '
.. ' . ..,,.~!0>};,~·:.-.. \ .. ' . . /.. ':f;'•"'~ If
.,
'
• I
'n'le !nl}l.ewoa! Cent.evlial-BicentenniaJ. O:Jimitt. nMipecttuUy ~
that City Cbmcil 8llll!lnd ita Reeolutial f44 Serie8 of 1975 to oon-
taaa to the I'IIIIW d1rec::t.ia1 and project .. appi['OWd by the a.aittae
at a -.t1ng hale! Q\ Wadnelday, Clc1:tJber 29, 1975. 'n'let the official
En]lewood ~-Bicent:ennial Cl:mllitt. troject: be aa foll.owa:
. _.
l.
2.
3.
4.
'lb wdc1:ake • fund-raiai.ncJ ~ to raUe
$100,000 toward the OCNtruction of. Recrea-
ticnal. Cct:er for the Elderl y.
'!bat City Cl:luncil. appmye uai.nq City tun:!a for
the .taQ!inder of oonat:ruct.i.cn oosta, utimataS
to be an additional $500,000.
Q:lntribJtiona reoeiva! fran the camunity,
(imiv.iduals and tusineues) may be designata!
as "Living Msaorials" in honor to or in II8IDry
of a loved ale, friend, or tuau... ueoeiate.
To be placed in bralze plaque form in the ~iate area of the new center in l*i*blit:y. .·,
Q:lntribJtiauJ reoeiwd may be p~ an:! pa~ '
0\l'er • three-year period and that City Cbmcll
direct the City M11n1qar to appoint a City~
to be responsible for all billi.nq ..S oolleeti.al
..
• •
0
•
.
~.
"I
;
•
. 7
•
•
.. , . .
" .. ,. ,.
·I
at aid pl-.. far an:! on t..iiu of the Enql.al:xld
Csttslnial-Biosrt:ennial Oc:lllllitta aftar the ·
officjal. ~ of aid ~t:Cae ': !V "• ~. )
•,1 ,• • •" .. ',.1·~ •I ,-:~,1, ~~ ~-• .:: ~~} ~ -
---~7 s. '1!w c.ntar -. to m .-n b , t.eJt_... ·••
indivictJal.a ar tuaineuee that aay wish to ~Senate
in 811108811 of $50,000. Said aiiiCUnt can be ply&bla ·
c:Mir a fiw yaar special pl.tdge prograu. In the
evwtt that no aJCh ccntril:luticn i.e ~,
the city ocux:U ~ then ~ the ri9ht to
NDB the ~ app:opdately. ~. ·· • '·"\)'";• .~, ~J: ·~ ,~r
6. All tund8 ltcnated, pl\18 accrued . int:eraef, be
returned to the donal:8 .mwd the center not
be built.
7. Dizect the City Manager to pnpan pnliminary
plana for the af~ C8ttil!lr 1 ~ ldDlld
incl\de ocnstNcticl'l OOIIt Mtiates lztlkc dcM\
to the Dm1Y different areu of the center 1 tlue
enabl.ing individual roam IDSIDrlallzation approparticnate
to the OCJIIII.Inity aJppa.rt.
Your IUppXt and approval for oonstructi.on of Mid Center i.e reapect-
fully requMted.
• •
0
. ,
.. .
•
•
November 17, 1975
Page 11
•
-
Ayes: Council Members Jones , Seve rn, Mann, Brown ,
Clayton , Taylor.
Nays: None .
Ab sent: Counc il Member Blessing.
The Mayo r declared the .Jnot.lon carr~~d.· -.. ___ ... .._ . . " . . .
David Batche lor , 7101 South Webs te r;· Litt leton ,
presented a letter from the Englewood Centennial-Bicentennial
Co mmittee outlining a request to change Resolution No. 44 ,
Series of 1975 , in order to conform to the new direction and
projec as approv ed by th e Centennial-Bicentennial Committee.
He outlined seven points:
1 . The Committee is to undertake a fund -raising •
campaign to raise $100 ,00 0 tow ar d c onstruct ion
of a recreational center for the elderly .
2 . City Co uncil would approve using City funds
for the remainder of construction costs
estimated to be an additiona l $500,000.
3. Cont ributions received from the communit y
may be designated as living memorials.
4 . Cont ri butio ns received may be pledged and
payable over a three-year period .
5 . The center name to be open for memorializa-
tion by individuals or businesses that may
wish to donate in excess of $50,000 .
6 . All funds donated, plus accrued interest, be
returned t o the donor should the center not
be built.
1. The City Manager prep~re preliminary plans
for the a forementioneJ center •
The letter was signed by Grady Franklin Maples and
Ken ne th E . Mausolf .
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN JONES SECONDED
A MOTION TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE A NEW RESOLUTION
REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 44 , SERIES OF 1975, AND TO INCORPORATE
THE ITEMS LISTED IN THE LETTER FROM THE CENTENNIAL-BICENTENNIAL
COMMITTEE WITH THE FOLLOWIN G EXCEPTIONS: PARAGRAPH 5 . THE FIRST
.• \ ( ,.
• •
•
•
•
November 17, 1975
Page 12
•
0
•
,.
SENTENCE SHALL READ . "PORTIONS OF THE CENTER MAY BE OPEN FOR
t4EMORIALIZATION BY TNDIVIDUALS OR BUSINESSES THAT MAY iH3H TO
DONATE ItJ EXCESS OF $50 ,000 ."; PARAGRAPH 6 SHOULD READ , "ALL
FUNDS DONATED PLU S ACCRU£D INTEREST , LESS EXPENSES INC URR ED
FOR THE FU D RAISING CAMPAI GN, WILL BE PROPORTIONATELY RETURNED
TO THE DONOR SHOULD THE CENTER NOT BE BUILT,"
COUNCILMAN MA NN
A MOTION TO AMEND ITEM " BY IP~I~l~-t;.~~
CITY OF ENG LEWOOD WILL PERI
ACCOUNT .
Ass istant City Manager Nollenberger stated that
t his would automatical ly be done by the auditor during his
a udit of the City. ,{le,, .......
Coun cilma n Mann and Councilman Clayton removed t~eir
moti on and se cond.
COUNC ILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUN CILM AN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTIOJJ TO AMEND BY CHANGING PARAGRAPH 7 TO PARAGRAPH 8 AND
ADDING A NEW PAR AGR APH 7 TO READ AS FOLL OWS : "THE FUNDS ARE
TO BE GIVEN TO THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD AS A GIFT FROM THE CITI-
ZENS AND THAT THE FUNDS BE USED FOR A RECREATIONAL CENTER FOR
THE SENIOR CIT IZEN S OF ENGLEWOOD." •
Up on a call of the roll, the vot e on the amendment
resulted as follow ~:
Ayes : Council Membe rs Jones, Severn, Mann, Browr.,
Clayt on , Ta ylor .
Nays : I~ one .
Absent : Council Member Blessing.
The Mayor de clared the motion carried,
Councilma n Clayton questioned whether this money
must be used for a new building or whether it can be usea t:o
rehabilitate an existing building , As it stands , i ~ is n::·~
st ated in the letter .
Councilman Mann st ated that in his opinion Council
is not ready to make this type of a determination,
Councilman Sovern stated that we are talking about
a new structure because it is e asier to sell a new structure
in the context of fund raising •
. ,
• •
0
-
•
•
·. •
c-====~---------===-----==~=====-=:;=======..-·
•
November 17, 1975
Page 13
Councilman Mann stated that the City Council
should not eliminate any possible options which are avail-
able.
Mr. Batchelor stated that, in his opinion, if
$100,000 is not raised the Committee and the .Council can
then negotiate • as to the iSitpo~;a;o h ·pro.IIN 'i '•Jtr ;. . ·
answer to Councilman Mann queM-to ~ M B che-Ri-~ ed ~--·
that if under $100,00 0 is raised ~h ..,lcti l · •• ..... · ·
given to the City,
Councilman Severn stated that the City has budgeted
$500,000 for this project. Even if the $100,000 is not raised
by the Committee, the project would not be that far off finan-
cially from the needed money goal. • ·
Upon a call of the roll, the vote on the motion •
as amended resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones, Sovern, Mann, Brown,
Clayton, Taylor.
Nays: None,
Absent: Council Member Blessing.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* • * • • •
COUNCILMAN JONES MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOT ION TO REFER TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSIO!J A
REC OMMENDATION FROM THE CENTENNIAL-BICENTENNIAL COMMITTEE CON-
CERNING THE RENAMING OF INTERCHANGE PARK TO SKERRITT PARK.
Upon a call or the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones, Severn, Mann, Brown,
Clayton, Taylor .
Nay s: None.
Absent: Council Member Blessing,
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
• • • • • •
COUNCILl\1AN JONES MOVED AND COUNCILMAN ~ROWN SECO NDED
A MOTION TO APPROVE AN ENCROACHMENT FIVE FEET OVER CITY PR OPB RTY
FOR AN OVERALL LENGTH OF SIXTY-THREE FEET WHICH WILL BE EIGHT
FEET ABOVE THE SIDEWALK AT 101 WEST HAMPDEN AVENUE FOR THE
ASPEN TREE GALLERY. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted
as follows:
·. . ,
• •
0
f
-
.•.
•
•
•
• ,_
0
•
'""'-'-'CUiUC:!' .LJ .J.'::JI?
Page ::.2
COUNCIL MA N SOVER N MOVED AND COUNCILr~A N BLESSBG 3ECO:WE1
A MOTION TO PASS A BILL FOR AN OR DINANC E REPEALING AND RE-ENA CTIN(
SEC TIONS 9 AND 10 , CHAPTER 1, TITL E II, OF THE 196~ ENGLEWOOD
MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING NEW SE C~IONS THERETO RELATING TJ F~RE
MEN 'S PENSIONS , SP ECIA L FUND, DI SABILITY, PENSIONS AND DECLARI:JG
AN EMERGENCY. Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted a s follows:
., Ayes: Council M~!)ers_~v on e~. SQve:rn._ Nann, B~e~si !'lg ,
Brown , Taylor. .., ~ ... ~ ,.,.. · •
Jays : None .
Absen t: Co uncil Membe r Clayton.
The Mayo r decl ared the motion carried.
* * * * * •
RESOLU~ION JO . 62 , SERIES OF 1975,
RESOLUTIO N APPROVING AND AD OPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
COMMUNITY CENTER FOR 7HE CIT Y OF ENGLEWOOD AS ITS OFFIC:~L
CE! 'rENniAL -BICENTEI !H AL PROJE CT; APPROVING THE TEMPORARY
EMPLOYMENT OF ELWIN D. BATCHELOR, A PROFESSIONAL FUND-RAISER,
TO SUPERVISE THE ENGLEWOOD CAMPAIGN TO RAISE FUNDS FOR SAID
PROJECT; AND DIRECTIHG THE SALARY FOR SAID FUND-RAISER TO
COME FROM VOLUNTARY CONTRIBU TIONS, AND REPEALING RESOLU7I JN
NO. 44 , SERIES OF 197 5 .
COUNCILMAN BRO WN MOVED AND COUNC ILI•1AN SOVER , s:::c c·tJuED
A MOTI ON TO PASS RESOLUT ION NO. 62, SERIES OF 1975.
~~yo r Taylor s tated that he understood tnat th!a was
a resolution for a Sen i or Citizens Recreation Center and net a
or~unity Center as stat ed in the resolution.
COUNCILMAH SOVERN NOVED AND COUNCILMAN BLESSI NG
SECOI'DED A MOTION TO AMEND RESOLUTION NO . 62, SERIES OF 1 975,
BY REPLACING TH::: WORDS "CC MMUNITY CENTER" WITH "SENI OR CITIZENS
RECREATIOIJ CEN'I L:R" \VIiEREV:~R FOUND IN 'I .t E RESOLUTIO N. IJ;:-or, a
ca~l o r the r·ol i , the vot .. resu lted a~ follows:
Ayes : Council l·l embers Jones, Severn, Hann , Blessing, Brown , Taylor .
Hays: Hone .
A :;en t: ~o uncil ~'!ember Cl a yton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried •
. ,
•.
• •
0
f
-
•
•
•
•
uecemoer ~. ~~~~
Page 13
•
0 -
...
I •
City Manager McCown referred to Section 6 of thi 2
resolution and indicated that there is no time limit indicated
in the event that the project is not built. Mayor Taylor s ~~ted
that this was done intentionally as there is no time limi t
desired. Mayor Taylor stated that because Mr. Batchelor has
not yet arrived at the Council meeting he would like to post-
pone discussion on this topic until he arrives.
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MDvtn· AMb COUNCILMAN JoNES S SCO~:so
A MOTION TO POSTPOUE ACT I ON OW RASO TieN NO. 62 UNI'IL M .• ·
BATCHELOR ARRIVES AT THE MEETING . Upon a call of the ro:~,
the vote resulted as follows: · ·
Ayes: Council Members Jones. Severn, Mann, Ble rs~. ~.
Brown, Taylor.
Nays: None.
Abs ent: Counc i l Member Clay ton.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
Mayor Taylor declared a recess at 9:05 p.m. The
meeting reconvened at 9:20p .m. Upon a call of the roll, the
fol lowing were present:
Co unci l Members Jones, Severn, Mann, Blessing, Brown,
and Mayor Taylor.
Absent: Council Member Clayton.
Th e Mayo r d~clared a quorum prese::t.
* • * * * *
City Attorney Berardin i gav e a brief backgro und into
the Arap's Restaurant and Lounge situation as i t stands at this
point . He s aid that the City ha~ thirty days from ~Jo vember 21
in ~hich to appeal the District Court declsion awarding the
liquo r license to Arap 's. In answer to Coun:ilman Mann 's ques-
tion, City Attorney Derardini stated that if the City does
n o thing i n regards t o t he appea l the ~iq u or license will be
issued pursuan t to the co urt o~ier .
Councilman B!·own stated that he has been through the
es tablishment and wa s f avorably impress~J with the int:erior of
Uh e facilit y . He said that the City co u ld us~ a good restaurant
in that area. He furt.li er statt!d that earliel' that eve"linb at
the study session Rev ~I~nd Fixture from the Englewood United
Method ist Church announced that he had received a bNnb threat
. , • .• I !
'r
I • •
-
..
•
•
•
•
•
• •
December 1, 1975
Page 19
City Manager McCown stated that there is a small parcel
of land south of the public service land which is owned by the
Denver Rio Grande Railroad which needs to be purchased for the
construction of the golf cours e. The Denver Rio Grande Railroad
indicated that they would be willing to sell the land based upon
the appraisal of two years ago. The cost for purchase of the
land would be $7,15 0 . City Manager McCown re cQmmen@ed that
Council approve purchase of the land. ~·
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED A
MOTION TO AUTHORIZE TH E PURCHASE OF LAND FROM THE DENVER RIO
GRANDE RAILROAD FOR $7,150. Upon a call of the roll, the vote
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones, Severn, Mann, Blessing,
Brown, Taylor.
Nays: None.
Absent: Council Member Clay ton .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * I I I I
David Batchelor, 7101 South Webster, Littleton, was
present representing the Englewood Centennial-Bicentennial
Committee. Mr. Batchelor read a letter from t he Englewood
Centennial-Bicentennial Committee outlining the support that
the Committee would like from the City:
1. Permission to use the full January 1976
edition of the "EnglewOodCitizen" as
their official campaign brochure.
2. Access to and use of the City of Englewood
mailing list as used for the "Englewood
Citizen".
3. Permission to u se the City of Englewood
"Third Class N534" bulk mailing permit
for mailing the campaign brochures •
4. All ex pens es incurred over and above the
usual cozts to the City for sue~edition
shall be borne by the Engle\~ood Centennial-
Bicentennial Committee .
In answer to Cou ncilman Blessing's question, Mr •
Batchelor stated that there will be no kids going from door to
door soliciting fund s for this p roject. The funds will be
solicited via phone or mail and will be made on a pledge basis.
·' \ !
' "
• .
• •
0
f
-
-..
•
•
•
•
December 1, 1975
Page 19
•
-
City Mana ge r McCown stated chat there is a small parcel
o f land s ou t h o f t h e p ublic se r vice land which is owned by the
Den ver Rio Grande Railroad whi c h needs to be purchased for the
constru c tion of the g o lf c ours e . The Denver Rio Grande Railroad
indicated that they wou ld be willing to sell the land based upon
the apprai s al of tw o y ears ago. The cost for purchase of the
land woul d be $7,1 50 . City Manager McCown rec9mme"9ed that
Council approve purchase of the land. .-;-
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDE D A
MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE PUR CHASE OF LAND FROM THE DENVER RI O
GRA NDE RAILROAD FOR $7,150. Upon a call of the roll, the vote
resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Jones, Sovern, Mann, Blessing,
Brown, Taylor.
Nays: None.
Absent: Council Member Clay t on.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * • • • •
David Batchelor, 7101 South Webster, Littleton, was
present representing the Englewood Centennial-Bicentennial
Committee. Mr. Batchelor read a letter from the Englewood
Centennial-Bicentennial Committee outlining the support that
the Committee would like from the City;
1. Permission to use the full January 1976
edition of the "EnglewO"'d'"""Citizen" as
their official campaign brochure.
2. Access to and use of the City of Englewood
mailing list as used for the "Englewood
Citizen".
3. Permission to use the City of Englewood
"Third Class #534" bulk mailing permit
for mailing the campaign brochures •
4. All ex penses incurred ~and above the
usual c o z ts t o the City for such an edition
shall be borne by the Engle\'lood Centennial-
Bicentennial Committee.
In answer to Councilman Blessing's question, Mr •
Batchelor stated that there will be no kids going from door to
door soliciting f u nds for this proj ect. The funds will be
solicited via phone or mail and will be made on a pledge basis.
. , ·' I I
' 'r ••
'
I · •
0
•
•
•
uecemoer ~. ~Y f?
Pag e 20
•
0
•
t•
City Ma nager McCown stated that in Section 6 of
Resolution No . 62 , Series of 1975, there is no provision for
pin-pointing the time at which a determination is made that
the building will not be built. He asked how this determina-
tion is going to be made.
Mr. Batchelor stated that 1978 would seem a logica l
time to make tnis ?e~ermination aa the c~. ,~oull.~~~;~J:l~. infQ¥'-:-•
mally indicated tha~ the funds woul"d be a -i'jf()priateif· 1ri'. 197 '(}':~·
He -f\u:.;.her~1i.Nilfd ,1\.._t . ...ab1a,..hou~,.,~ d~tl•,._
t he City Council and the Englewood Centen & -Bicentennial .,
Com mittee. Mr. Batchelor further stated t 'at · the· Englewood ·
Cen tennial-Bicentennial Committee will be formed into a non-
pro f it corporation and the proposed name, while not final, is
the Englewood Centennial-Bicentennial Foundation. The Board
of Dire ctprs will,,,be rpade up of twelve _me~~rs . from the ~ommu-
n ity. .,
Councilman Severn asked about the provision in
Section 5 of the resolution relating to five-year payment
periods for special pledges. Mr. Batchelor stated that this
was put in for extenuating circumstances on large contribu-
tions. Councilman Severn pointed out that there could be a
short fall of money from pledges if the pledges were spread
out over a three to five year period. Mr. Batchelor stated
that this is a standard practice and that banks will loan
mon ey to municipalities based on pledges if construction
be gins prior to completion of the pledge period. A discus-
sion between Counc il and Mr . Batchelor followed relating to
p ledges and funding.
In a nswer to Mayor Taylor's and Ci ty Manager McCown'f
qu estion, Mr. Bat chelor stated that if the Center is not started
in 1977 that t h e City Council and the Englewood Centennial-
Bicen t ennia l Co mmittee should meet to make a determination as
to i~ h e Center will be built.
U'1CIL MAN SOVE RN MOV ED AND COUNCILMAN MANN SECO NDED
A ::O':'ION TO ;,;.:~:;n RESO LUT ION NO. 62 , SERIES OF 1975, BY REVIS IK G
E C Tl O ~ 6 TO ~Z AD AS FOLLOW S: "IF CITY COU NCIL DETERMINES THA !
TH'.: CEN TER WILL :JOT BE BUILT, ALL FUNDS DONATED , AND ANY ACCR UED
::~ .:'ERE ST , LESS EXPENSES I!JCURRE D FOR THE FUND-RAISING CAf4PAI G
w:::..L BE PROP :JRT I 0NATELY RET URNED TO THE DONORS SHOULD THE CENTER
NC'i' BE BUILT". Upo n a call of the roll, the vote resulted as
foll ows:
Ayf!s: co uncil Members Jones, Severn, Mann, Blessing,
::>. _v;n , Taylor .
Nay s : None.
Abs ent: Counci l Mem ber Clayt on.
•.
'
-
I . •
0 f
~
•
•
•
• -
rage ~.J.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
A discussion followed between Council. City Manager
McCo wn . and Mr. Batchelor relating to the Englewood Citizen
schedule and cost . City Manager McCown stated that the Engle-
wood Citizen costs approximately $1 0 800 per issue. The City
could either move the February issue into January or they
could have a special January issue devoted to the project. ;. ""J .. Mr. Batchefb'r '"at.lteU e .1Dd8f ,. ·',.c.a.ennial:f·
Biceotenni.JLl . Cornm1 ttu haa . ...$2 .-<>().. a 1
Upon a call of the roll. the vote resulted as follows
for Resolution No. 62 as amended:
Ayes: Council Members Jones, Severn, Mann, Blessing,
Brown, Taylor.
Nays : None.
Absent: Council Member Clayton.
The May or declared the motion carried.
COUNCILMA N SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN MANN SECONDED
A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD CENTENNIAL-
BIC ENTENNIAL COMMITTEE AND TO MOVE THE FEBRUARY ISSUE OF THE
ENGLEWOOD CITIZEN TO JANUARY 1976. Up on a call of the roll.
the vote resulted as fol lows:
Ayes: Council Mem bers Jones. Severn, Mann, Blessing.
Brown . Taylor .
Nays : None.
Absent: Council Member Clayton.
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
Ma yo r Taylor a sked that Mr. Batchelor not do anything
in terms of publ icity until after the election on December 23,
1975, as he do es not want any con flict with the publicity for
the elect ion .
* • • • • •.
Counc ilman Severn stated that with the new Council
a ppo intments com ine; up soon, he wo.uld like to be kept on the
De nver Regional Coun cil of Go vernments Committee. He said
there are many projects in the mill which he would like to
ca rry thrC'ugh,
..
• •
0
,
-
•
•
• ....
•
~========--------------~=-~~~~==========~~
c
(
•
•·' '
-3-
ATTEST:
I, William 0. James, ex officio City Clerk-Treasurer of the
City of Englewood, Colorado, do hereby certify that the above and
foregoing is a true, accurate and complete copy of the Resolution
No. ~. Series of 1975.
• .
'
• •
0
,
•
•
' i
•
. , .
•
-2-
Section 4
Contributio ns received may be pledged and payable over a three
year period, and that City Council hereby directs the Ci~ Manager to
appoint a City employee to be respo nsible for all billing and collec-
tion of said pledges for and on beha f of the Englewood Centennial-
Bicentenn ia l Committee after the offi cial discharge of said Committee.
Section 5
Portions of the center~ be open for memorialfzation by
individuals or businesses that may wish to donate in excess of
Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000). Said amount may be payable over
a five-year special pledge program. In the event that no such con-
tribution is forthcoming, the City Council should then reserve the
right to name the center appropriately.
Section 6
If the City Council determines that the center will not be
built, all funds donated, and any accrued interest, less expenses
incurred for the fund-raising campaign, w111 be proportionately
returned to the donors should the center not be built.
Section 7
The funds are to be given to the City of Englewood as a gift
for the citizens, and that the funds be used for a recreational
center for the senior citizens of Englewood.
Section 8
The City Manager is hereby directed to prepare, or to have pre-
pared, the preliminary plans for the aforementioned center, which
should include construction cost estimates broken down into the many
different areas of the center, thus enabling individual room memorial-
ization apportionate to the community support.
Section 9
That Resolution No. 44, Series of 1975, adopted and approved
on the 15th day of September, 1975, is hereby expressly repealed.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 1st day of December, 1975.
• •
0
•
(
•
• ,_
-
RESOLUTION NO. ~· SERIES OF 1975.
A RESOLUTION APPROV I NG AND ADOPTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SENIOR
CITIZENS RECREATION CENTER FOR THE CITY C•l" ENGLEWOOD AS ITS OFFICIAL
CENTENNIAL-BICENTENNIAL PROJECT; A l'Pt!fl'f1~1G THE TEMPORARY EHPLOYMENT
OF ELWIN D. BATCHELOR, A PROFESSION .:'_ F Li i ~-RAISER, TO SUPERVISE THE
ENGLEW OOD CAl ·fr'AtGN TO RAISE liUNos..f'-· ~ · P~EC ' • Df~EC'flltl' ·
THE SI\LARY fOR S;>.:D FUND-PA1S£R . ~r;;:Ot·r;iOL 0
AND REPEALING RES OLUTVJN NO: 44, ER "':W 1"5.
WHEREI\S, ~!-P. Englewoo d C(:nteM i a·i ·;entenn1a1 Comllittee was
org ani zed to .v th e City Council of the C1 _ ... of Englewood, Colorado,
to provide dir!!ction ar.d methods, in conjunction with state and
fed eral agencies, to celebrate not only the nation's 200th Anniver-
sary, but a1 ~o the lOOth Anniversary of the State of Colorado; and
~a :FPE AS , t~e Eng lewood Centennial-B i centennial Coi!1Tiittee has
reccrr.:r.ended th d".. t .. ~ of~icial project adopted en behalf of the City
of F•:g l t>'~cod fr:-s.-id ce~ebration be the construction of a Senior
Citi ;:~n~ Pe>Cl-n'l '.ic:o Center; and
~HE q[AS. ;~ •; dc ~ir~~·~ to ~0c~r e f1nanring for such project t hrou ~h vol u ·~tor :' co'1trit-uti l)n s of -es idents of the City and citizens
v;h o !;uppo rt t !1 e 5en;'1 r C i t i7~>n~ Rrr:-<:a Hcn Center concept.
NOW, THEtl.EF Ui{L !\E IT r FSOL fC n: -HE CITY COUNCI L F THE CITY
OF ;:%t.EHO OD, C C1 ·_·:~r;:.,~. ; t" I f"loJ<:
~~~!?_~]-
Th a t t he C' .y Counc i h r e b approves an adopts the undertaking
for a fund-r a i s;r carpai9r r ~e 0 ne Hund r e d Thousand Dollars
($1 1)0 ,000) to.,.,·a ~d th cMst~•• t ic'l o" a recreational center for the
e 1 (1er1y.
That Ci~J ~1u nci ap prove s the use of City funds for the remainder
of the con ~~rurt ;o n costs . r-~.t'IT'a ted to be an additional Five Hundred
Thous and Ool~ar s (~500 ,000}.
. Contrib·t ~•,.,~ rr-r.,ived from t he corrrnun1ty (individuals and
tlus :n esses) n~y .,, d r:;~qnil+": ~> "1 iving memorials" in memo ry of a
loved one. friend, or business associate, said memorial to be placed
in bronze pl aque form in t ~e appropriate area of the new center 1n
perpet.ui ty.
· .
•• • I
•
I . •
0
•
•
•
(
. . ,
December 8, 1 9 7 5
Page 2
~~yor James L. Taylor and
He mb e rs o f City Counc il
•
0
•
The Execut ive Co mm i': ~e o f ~he En!.J l swe>Gd .cen.nnial-Bicentennial CGIInittee
wish e s to ask City Co u n " 1.:. f (.: i ts a p p .r o v a 1 ar.d c l'll!orseft!en~ o! the a e
memo rJ.a lizatio n ;>lan.o. You r at t~11 tlon to t his m ~er at your next
r egular ly s c hed•.1led mee ti ng wi 11 he mu ch appr eciated .
Tha nk yo·~ ve ry muc h .
I • •
0
'
•
•
•
December 8, 1975
•
•
Broa
Littleton, Colorado
y
80121
Mayor James L. Taylor and Members of City Council
Englewood, Colorado
Gentlemen:
,. .
}.b
At the EXecutive Committee meetinq of the Enqlewood Centennial-Bicentennial
committee, it was agreed that ..-oriali&ation in the proposed new Recrea-
tion Center for senior Citizens be divided into four distinct and separate
categories:
l. Individual room INIIIOriali&ation wtwre an individual
making a substantial contribution aay deaiqnate a
memorial plaque to be placed on the door of tba
appropriate room.
2. Individual room furniahincJS aay be .-,riali&ed with
an appropriate plaque inside the room to read, "oriqinal
!l!rni shings donated by : name of donor and in .-ory of."
3. Mas ter memorial to cost $156.00 to be placed on a larqe
mE"m oria l plaque appropriately displayed in the .. in
lobby.
4 . In addition to the above methods of ...orializatlon,
na~es of individuals and businesses .. kinq donations
to the campaign be placed in a "Gold BoOk" and appropri-
ately displayed in the new Center .
• .
'
I • •
0
f 32xl
-
•
• , .
0 t•
•
~====~----~--~~==============~
uecemoer ~o. ~~I?
Page 2
Jean Carlberg , 3865 South Grant, President of the
Arapaho e County League o f Women Vo t ers, was present. She r ead ,
a stateme~t fr sm the League of Women Voters backing the G.O.
Bond Elect!c ~ to be held on December 23, 19 75.
• • • • • •
Dav id Batchelor , 71 01 South Webste~'-Littleton, was
present repJ•esenting the E rw;Le~o ·Cent.enJttla~icEial
Comm ittee. lie s:;a ted that ·tfle~n ewo9d Cl!n ni ~ ce tennial
Co~i t tee i~ now i n=o rp orat ~· non-pror orga i • He
read ~ let Pr ~rom the Corunit t ee proposing ~emorializaticns and
-·utl1:1lng .:· .u:· di f ferent plans available.
COUNCI D1AN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN MANN SECONDED
,\ l-1:-JT lON :•:· AG R::::::: WITH THE MEMORIALIZATION PROPOSAL AS PUT FO RTH
.:·--:; Dl 'rHE LE'l"l'ER FROM THE EN GLEWOOD CENTENNIAL-BICENTENNIAL COl-1MI'r-
7EE OF DE CEMB ER 8 , 1975. Upon a call of the roll, the vote
re3ulted 3 S fol lows:
;:,"'.>: Coun c il MernbP.rs Jones, Severn, Itfann, Clayton,
".'.~y lor.
:.:·.:;en' : .::oun c 11 l'1t>mb ers Blessing and Brown.
'.'hL· :·1ay.o :· d er :.are d tl1 e mo tion carried.
C0 :.1 N C ILJ'IlJ.~; ~ANN MOV ED AND COU NCILMAN CLAYTON SECON DED
A ~!:;TION TO CONSII'EH ITEM 8, "OTHER VISITORS", OUT OF AGENDA
3EQ:J ENCE . U;:JOn a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follow s :
.\yes: CClun cil Members Jones, Sovern, Mann, Clayton,
,\t;sen t: :ounc1l Member-s Blessing and Brown.
'}'he Mayor declared the motion carried.
If * I * I I
Sam Arrel l , 4845 South Huron, was present to express
h:!.s concE>rr. f~r t.::et cing children in his area to school via the
?'TD systt!:71, :!·~ :Jtr:.t·.·~ :!'l at RTD changed their routes, and it
no w takes his ch ild ren f ifty-five minutes to get to high school
1ns~ead of thirty mi r.ut es. The old route picked them up at
6:10 , 7:1 CJ ~:!:i :.:L a .·n. and tock them close to the high schoo l
..
•.
• •
0
.,.
•
•
•
•
I• -
"Parks & Recreation Commission
Minutes of December ll, l q7 5
rage -2-.....
Pa rle After discussion. Cushing moved, Blessi ng seconded, that recommendati0r ·
rn a de to City Cou ncil to name the Mi ni -Pa rk and Interchange at U.S. Highwa y 285 and
So uth Rroadway Ske r ritt Park and Ske rr itt Interchange in honor of Mr. Thomas Sker.rin
... , ..
and that th<:> plan be approved a s pre senr;d by fJi ar~'i ~~~-.,,. ; •
Mr. Cushing reported o n the m e eting w i th the Senior Citizen Ad'ltsory
Committee. The floor plan fo r the proposed Senior Citizen Center was presented
a nd eve ral recommendations were made. Those present were asked to take a copy
of the flo or plan back to their or ganizations and then they wUl meet again in January
t o get the input from the various groups. The floor plan was also reviewed by the
Commis sio n with several suggestions and changes recommended.
Cushing moved, Hewitt seconded, that recommendation be made to City Council
t hat the p r o posed Senior Citizen Ce nter be named CENTENNlAL CENTER FOR SENIOR
C!TIZ ENS. Motion carr ied.
Mr. Romans i nformed the Co mmi ssi on that George Pearson had submitted
his resignation effective Decem ber 12, 1975 .
Mr. Romans a sked the Commi:-sion if they had any objection to the use of
thetr n.1 m s 1!1 the pr omoti nal mat r ial for the Senior Cit izen Center . There wa s
.._,;
\11'. Ho n ans presented the diagram for t he fi rst ni ne holes of golf that has be e n
3I'rnw e lw t he Gcl\f Committee.
;,1!. l'c·.us c n i nfnrm <o>J the Commission that the bids have been received for the
Gre enhou s€' and are well within the budge t. The Greenhouse should be completed
within >:i. rv dav s .
~l r. H.:-wm report('d on the mee ting with Ghuck Porter of CSU concerning
•
• •
0
f
-
•
•
•
• ,. .
-
MEMORANIJlf\1 TO TH E ENGL L:WOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING RECOMMENDATION
OF Till:. 1 '\~K ~& RECRL\T!ON LO 1MISSION
ll,\T!:: December ll. 1975
SU Hj [\:T : :-.lAMING OF TilE PROPOSED SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
R ECO .1:-JFN!):\ TION : Th at the Eng lewood City .,~onslder-lldhrngt'rhe t •
propo sed Senior C itizen Center the CEh!TENNIAL
CE NTER FO R SENIOR CITIZENS.
1\~ order of the Parks & Recreation Commission
· Rec ording secretary
•.
I . •
0
•
•
-·. January 5, 197 6
Page 1 2
•
-
City r<lanager McCown presented two rezoning recommenda-•
tions f rom the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Acting Director of Community Development Romans made
a brief presentation to Council regarding this rezoning. She
stated that the rezoning is for the land between Hampden Avenu~
and Ithaca whi ch is presently zoned R-~ and R-4 ~o be rezQned1.
~ .. ..-. :-;t _9. .. Ji!-~. t>1s •. Ro ma na~ outline<S ~~e a~~tect,>:ar~a .!!' t .l!f. mat?· : .!.~ ;..
._..,.., • ' · ... ·• 'fl'-~~Lt'I'A~soo !lfN ~'"'lmtr.,6Mtm:I"Ro\.9s9m'tn1t ·
A MOTI ON TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP -AN ORDINAN CE
REZONING TH AT LA!W BETWEEN HAMPDEN AVENUE AND ITHACA PRESE NTL Y
ZONED R-3 AND R-Q TO B-2. Upon a call of the roll, the vote
resulted as follows:
•
. _ ~··· ~,.... · . Ayes: Council Members Williams, Sovern, :,Smi~h;
Cl ayt on , Brown , Mann, Taylor.
,.·:r '.
I '
:.
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
• • • • • •
City ~l anager McCo wn presented the recommendation from
the Parks and Recreat ion Commission that the Senior Citizens
Cen t er be named Centennial Center for Senior Citizens. He
stat ed t hat this project will not be constructed until 1977
an d recommend ed that this item be tabled.
COUNCILMAN SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN MANN SECONDED
A MOTION TO TABLE THIS RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARKS AND RECREA-
TION COMMISSION UNTI L SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE. Upon a call of
the ro ll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Sovern,·Smith,
Clayton , Brown, Mann, Taylor.
Nays: Non e.
The Mayor declared the motion carried •
• • • • • •
City Mana ger McCown presented a recommendation from
the Parks and Recreation Commission renaming Interchange Park
and t-11ni-Park to Skerritt Park 1n honor o! Mr. Thomas Skerritt,
Councilman Mann stated that he would like to see
parks named after people who are alive.
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN CLAYTON SECOND~D
A MOTION TO TABLE THIS RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PARKS AND RECREA-
'<'H'K COMMISSION INDEFINITELY. Upon a call ot the roll, the vote
,. ~esulted a s follows:
. ' •
I . •
0
f X
• I
·r
•
•
•
• ,._
•
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEW OOD CITY CO UN CIL R EGARDING RECOM M ENDA TlON
OF TH E PA RKS & R E CREATIO N C OMMISSION
DATE : Novembe r ll, 1976
SU BJEC T: SE NIOR C ITIZEN RECREATION CENTER ' r.
,, .
R E COM MEN DATION : That Englewood City Council reinstate the original Campus
type plan for the Senior Citizen Recreation Center with the
cul-de-sac and clos i ng of South Lincoln Street.
Re c omme ndation was made to the Commission by the
Senior Citizen Advisory Committee at their meeting on
October 28, 1976 as follows: "that the original Campus
Plan (Scheme G with 15, 000 sq. ft.) be kept." At the •
Commission meeting on November 11, 1976 motion was
passed to support this recommendation concerning the
site p lan but leave the building area at 13, 600 sq. ft.
By order of the Englewood Parks & Recreation
Commission
• . ,
I . •
0
f 32xl
• -•.
• t•
•
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Abstain AbsenJ;.
Williams '~ J,/
So vern ~ ~
5m11J1 v
Mann v
Brown " Clayt_on y
Mayor Taylor 1/ '
• I . •
0
· . • . I
• ,_
-•.
0
• . . .
Ni~/J 4,/qlr-/..
I :j ljl':r-J_r;• A --r;lr' ROLL CALL
1J;ppt1
Moved Seconded
•
I •
...... . ' '
• -•
0 I•
•
M ed S OV d d econ e A \ye N ay Ab sta n Ab sent
Wi 11 iams ~
Sovern ~
~ sm1tn v
~ Mann V'
Brown v
Clayton v
Mayor Taylor v ..
• I . •
0
·. .• ' r
I • . , ,
"
•
•
•
•
0
•
~:~~ ~ t:?A.L ~d;,.W (fr~~~f,L_ ~
fhj~
,._
37/f/ s;_/~ :J).~-r?~~ ~~-~g~/!_.H 7 r:-~7
tt.7 ~
'
I . •
0
•
•.
• I• -
ROLL CALL
Mov ed Seconded A 1\Ye Nay A bstain A bsent
Williams
Sovern
~ sm1tn v v
~ Mann {/' I"'
Brown i/
C_layton v v
Mayor Taylor v ..
•
• • •
0
• .. f
• -• .
• •
ROLL CALL
ov econ e A we Nav Abstain Absent
Williams
Sovern
Slll1th
Mann
Brown
v {;layton
Mayor Taylor ..
•
• I . •
0
. ' •
• -•.
• , .
•
ff:tJ:.~' Seconded Ave
Williams
Nav Abstain Absent
Sovern
smftn y
·V' Mann 1/
v/ tsrown l?:::oJ,t::"
!;layton 'V'
Mayor Taylor f./
"
•
• I . •
0
•' \ !
I
~ f 32xl
• ...
•.
, .
•
ROLL CALL
Moved Abstain Absent
'
...
• I . •
0
f . , .• I !
I
'! •
•
•.
0 t•
•
ROLL CALL
ove econ e A N ~ye ay Ab sta n Ab sent
Williams
Sovern
sm1tn v----Mann ,t../
Brown J,./ b--v Clayton v
Mayor Taylor 1/ "
• I . •
0
• . ,
• -
, .
•
ROLL CALL
Mov ed Seconded A we Nay Absta n A bsent
Williams .~
Sovern ~
4!11: Sn11ttl /../
Mann t/
L--' Brown v--
t.-/ Clayton 1/
Mayor Taylor {../"
•
• I . •
0
• f
•
-
ROLL CALL
M d S ove d d econ e A \ye Na IY Ab ta1 s n Ab t sen
Williams
Sovern
~nn
Mann
Brown
Clayton
Mayor Taylor
• • •
0
•
•
•
• ,_
t•
·, •
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Abstain Absent
~~~~~~~ ~-r~-/o:>':/o/
£~
I . •
0
•
•.
0 (•
•
ROLL CALL
M ed S OV d d econ e A \ye N ay Ab sta n Ab sent
Williams
Sovern
sn11 ttl
Mann
Brown
{;layton
Mayor Taylor
I . .
0
• '
• ,_
•.
0 , •
•
ROLL CALL
OV econ e A B,ye Nay Ab sta n Ab sent
Williams
So vern
:imltn , v
Mann -~
t..----Brown v
t--1.1ayton (/
Mayor _Taylor ~
'
•
• I . •
0
• . '
• -• .
• •
ROL L CA LL
OV econ e A ~ye Nay Ab sta n Ab sent
Will 'lams
Sovern
&.---' ~ltn 1/
t/ _M_ann v
Brown 1//
Clayton v v Mayor Taylor v
•
• I . •
0
• . ,
f 32xl
• -
• •
•
•
•
Absent
~----
. . .
I . •
0
• -. , .
•
Abstain Absent
'
• I . .
0
• . ,
•
•.
0 t•
• ' . . .
ROLL CALL
• I •
-
•
•
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
Aye
1111ams
vern .....1 nn;n . v
ann v
rown v
l AY t On v v
ayor _1~1or v
(! lvf. ~
~~?~ £~
--
Nay Abstain Absent
~~~:f ~~~
~e{!,~
~;_;( ~/.J..<....e--¥~
'
• .
. .
-··
I ·~
~
. ~
r•
I '·
I . •
0
. ,
•
•
. , -
• t~
•
Abstain Absent
a~~~~~~:&C-77 c;;?~~
\J"
. ,
• •
,
•
-
•
•
• .
r • '
•
' 32X
-
•
I • -
CITY COUNCIL MEETING -Jan . 10, 1977
Special
•
, .
'
0
\
I . •