HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-03-01 (Regular) Meeting Agenda Packet• -
0 I• -
0
--CITY COUNCIL MEETING
March 1, 1976 Regular
•
•
-
•
•
•
(\J 1
....
•
0
•
AGENDA FOR
THE REGULAR MEETIN• OF THE
EN LEWOOD CITY OUNCIL
MARCH 1 , 197
I•
7 :30 P .M. Call t o ord er , invocat i on by Mr . Werne r Sc hnackenberg ,
of th e Ba 'ha i Assembly of Englewood , pledge o f al -
legiance led by Cub Scout Pack #153 , a nd r o ll c all.
1. Minut e s.
(a) Min utes of the regular m ing of Fe bruary 17 ,
1976 . (Copi s enclose . )
2 . Pub l i c Hearings.
~(a ) Qr dinan £ a horizing
of the s wer refunding
a mount of $1,516,000 .
(b) Qrd i nauc , rezoning a
in an area bounded
St reet , on the Nor
a nd on th Eas y
(c)
e xt nde
R-1 -,
R-2 , me
amen in
(Copie
land located
by South Decatur
he
siden i l
end-
..
• •
•
•
0 I ~
•
page 2
March 1 Agend a
3. Communi cation s -No Action Recommend ed.
(a) Minutes of the Council meet ing of the Den ver
Regional Council of Governments on January 21,
1976. (Copies enclosed .)
(b) Minutes of the Planning and Zon ing Commission
meeting of February 3 , 1976. (Copies enclosed .)
(c) Minutes of the Fir e Pension Boa rd meeting of
February 11 , 1976. (Copies enclosed.)
(d) Minut es of the Parks and Recreation Commission
me eting of February 12 , 1976 . (Copies enlosed. )
(e) Letter from John Cr iswel l, special counsel ,
concerning the Atchison Ranch Litigation.
(Copies enclosed .)
(f) Annu al Report for the City of Englewood for
the year 1975. (C opies enclosed.)
(g) Letter f r om the Office of the tate Auditor
to the City Council nd let er from the Director
of Finance to he Office of h e State Auditor
concernin he 1974 Fina cial Report of the
City of Englewood. (Copies enclo sed.)
(h) Mem o randum from the Director of Publ i c Works
to the City Manager cone rning highway study
prepare by Centennial En ineers f o r the State
D artment of Hi hways o U. S. 285 in the
vicini y of Engle wood. (Copies enclose d.)
4. Communica ions -Action R commen •d .
(a) Minutes of th Water nd ewer Board meeting
of Febru ry 18, 1976 wi I. he follo win recom-
m ndatlons:
( 1)
( 1 )
nclo . ) • •
,
]-
(
•
•
I• -
page 3
March 1 Agenda
4. Communications -Actio n Recommended (Continued).
(b) Recommendations from ~e Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting of February 18, 1976 as
follows:
,. r
l"f
(c)
(i) Concerning amendments of the Comprehen-
sive Zoning Ordinance, Se ction 22.5 and
Section 22.8, temporary structures.
(ii) Concerning approval of the R-2-C zone
district for the area bounded by Kenyon
on the North, Sherman -Grant alley on the
East, Oxford on the South and Broadway-
Lincoln alley on the West. (Bill for
~Ordinance enclosed.)
(Copies enclosed.)
Reso
General
Council
(Copies
amending the
Fund to provide
Budget ror Aid
enclosed. )
1976 Budget in the
f nds in the Ci y
o Other Agencies.
5. City A orn e y.
Bill or an Ordin n ·~p .
(a) concerning amendmen of the pay scales
Fire , Pol i ce , nd Non-Emergency Employees
in h 1969 Englewood Mun c ipal Code. (Copies
e closed .)
R olu i on.
(c) or
l
(Co 1ea
( ) A or y '
•
-
(
•
•
I•
•
page 3
March 1 Agenda
4. Communica ions-Action Recommended (Con inued).
(b) Recommendations from ~e Planning and Zoning
Commission meeting of February 18 , 1976 as
follows:
(i) Concerning amendments of the Comprehen -
sive Zoning Ordinance , Section 22 .5 and
Section 22 .8 , temporary s ructures.
/ (ii) Concerning approval of the R-2 -C zone
district for the area bounded by Kenyon
on the North , Sherman -Grant alley on t he
East , Oxford on the South and Broadway-
Lincoln alley on the West. (Bill for
~Ordinance enclosed.)
(c)
(Copies enclosed.)
Resol
General
Council
(Copies
amending the
Fund o provide
Bud et ror Aid
enclos . )
5 . City At orney.
Bill or an Ordit.1n e.
1976 Budget in the
nds in the City
o 0 her Agencies .
(a) concerning am ndmen
t e Fire , Police , nd
in he 1969 Engl wood Mun
enclosed.)
of the pay scales
on -Em ergency Employees
c1pal Cod . (Copies
Resolution.
(b)
0 h
(c)
( ) A y'. ho i
Uquor
n a
1
'
• •
•
•
• t•
•
page 'l
March 1 Agenda
6. City Manager.
(a) Memorandum to the Ci y Manager from the Assistant
City Manage r concerning City Council retreats .
(Copies enclosed.)
(b) Memorandum o th City Manager from the Assistant
City Manager and the Director of Public Works
concerning Zuni Street construction . (Copies
enclosed.)
(c) Considera ion of contribution by City Council
bthe Housin A thority of the City of Englewood . .,. I ~ .....
(d) Consid eration o request concern ing rezoning
in Scenic View area .
~
(e) Mana ger's Choi ~.
1 . Other Visitors.
8 . General Discussion.
(a) Mayor's ChoicP.
(b) Council Member' Choice .
9. Adjou nm n .
i ' . I , , ..
L ~~~~~'-And McCown
Cl y Manag r
• .
'
• •
I
1-
•
REGULAR MEETING :
•
0
•
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO
February 17 , 1976
/CL
The City Council of the City of Englewood , Arapahoe
County , Colorado , met in regular session on February 17 , 1976
at 7 :30 p .m.
Mayor Taylor , presiding , called the meeting to order .
The invocation was given by Reverend David Hunter of
Hampden Hills Baptist Church , 3095 South University . The Pledge
of Allegiance was led by Boy Scout Pack 153 .
Mayor Taylor asked for roll call . Upon the call of
the roll , the following were present :
Council r~embers Williams , So vern , Smith , Brown , Mann ,
Clayton , and Mayor Taylor .
Absent: None .
The Mayor declared a quorum present .
Also present were: City Manager McCown
Asst . City Manager Nollenberger
City Attorney Berardini
Acting Director of Community
Development Romans
Dir ctor of Finance Jam
• • • • • •
COUNCILMAN BROW MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SMITH I::CONDED
A MOTIOI TO APPROVE THE MINUTE' OF THE REGULAR CITY COUtCIL
MEETING ON FEBRUARY 2 , 1976 . Upon a call of the roll, the vot
r t d s follows:
Ay s : Co neil M m r William , Smith, Brown, n,
Cl yton , T ylor .
A t in:
u y 0
Th M yot
o neil M m r Severn .
cl r th motion c rri
• • • • •
•.
• •
•
February 17 , 1976
Page 2
•
0
•
I •
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS SECONDED
A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEET -
ING ON FEBRUARY 9 , 1976 . Upon a call of the roll , the vote
result ed as follows :
Clayton . Ayes : Council Members Williams , Smith , Brown , Mann ,
Abstain : Council Members Severn , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the mot i on carried .
* * * • * •
Mayor Taylor presented a resolution to John C. Maxwell
for his years of outstanding service to the community of Englewood
and as a member of the Library Board .
RESOLUTION NO . 9 , SERIES OF 1976
A RESOLUTION COMMENDING JOHN C. MAXWELL OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO ,
FOR LOYAL AND DEVOTED SERVICE TO THIS COMMUNITY AS A MEMBER OF
THE ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD .
Mr . Maxwell was present to receive the resolution and
thanked th e members of Council .
COU NCILMAN SMITH MOVED AND COUNCILMAN CLAYTON SECONDED
A MOTION TO PASS RESOLUTION NO . 9 , SERIES OF 1976 . Upon a call
of the roll , the vote r esu lted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , 1-lann , Clayton , Taylor .
l y None .
Th Mayor declared the motion carried .
• • • • • •
th Ar p noe Co nty
"197 Vot rs
which h lp
be ad 1t1o 1
upcomin
• • • • • • • •
,
-
•
February 17, 1976
Page 3
•
-
the details of the proposed establishment . He stated that the
liquor license needs to be renewed and then transferred .
City Attorney Be~ardini disagreed with this process .
He stated there may be problems because this liquor license was
not renewed at the first of the year so there is no license in
effect . He requested that this item be tabled until more infor-
mation can be received .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO POSTPONE THIS ACTION UNTIL THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETING ON MARCH 1 , 1976 . Upon a call of the roll , the vote
resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown ,
Mann , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * • •
Oliver Giseburt, 3171 South High Street , was present
representing the Engle wood Insurers rou . He submitted a
resolution in objection to the specifications for the City 's
insurance and how they eliminated almost all of the Englewood
agencies from participating in the bidding . The resolution
was read by the City Cle rk .
Counc ilman 11ann pointed ou that Ordinance 45 , Series
of 1973 , a opt d a risk management olicy which caused these
minimum r ulrements .
a~ r roxima
!'ror.~ 11 E
McCown state that from th list of
ential idder s , one bid wa r ceived
• • * • • •
CL AYTON ~OVEO AID COUNCILMAN
HER MO' AR J OF C~fiC VI~
u,on c ll or tl roll ,
oc;o
•
February 17 , 1976
Page 4
•
0
•
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown ,
Mann , Clayton , Taylor .
Hays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Herb Mosbarger , 2250 West Wesley , Acting Chairman of
the Horthwest Englewood Action Group , was present to discu ss
the threats to close Scenic View School . He stated that more
people and children are needed in the area , and that rezoning
to R-2-C should help build up the area . The School Board has
given a deadline date of March 8 for their decision , and Mr .
Mosbarger aske d for Council 's cooperation and help . He stated
that plans for more family housing could effect the decision of
the School Board .
Counc ilman Severn pointed out that this is working
after the fact , and that a comprehensive plan needs to be
eveloped . He rec ommended a joint meeting of Council and the
Planning and Zoning Commiss ion to discuss this situation .
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SMITH SECONDED A
MOTION REQUESTING CITY STAFF TO SET UP A MEETING BETWEEN CITY
COUNCIL , PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION , AND NORTHWEST ENGLEWOOD
ACTION GROUP REGARDING THE SITUATION AT SCENIC VIEW SCHOOL .
A discussion by Council followed . Upon a call of the
roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council l•lembe r s Williams, Severn , Smi th, Brown ,
Mann , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor eel red the motion carried .
• • • • • •
David Batchelor , 7101 South Webster, Littleton , w
enting the Englewoo Centenni 1-Bicentennial
H re ort d that the official mount raised by
te is $51 ,000 ; n th y n ic1pate within th
ays this amoun will b over 70 ,000 .
• • • • • •
"Communica ions -Ho Ac ion R comm nded" on th
w r 11 cc t d:
Minu s of h Llbr ry Bo r m tin o
P bru ry 10 , l 7 •
,._
'
• •
-
•
•
0
•
February 17 , 1976
Page 5
(b) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission
meeting of January 20 , 1976 .
(c) Financial Report as of December 31 , 1975 for
the Fire Pension Fund .
(d) Financial Report as of December 31 , 1975 for
the Police Pension Fund .
(e) Financial Report as of December 31 , 1975 for
the Employees Retirement Pens i on Fund .
(f) Memorandum to the City Manage r from the Director
of Utilities regarding cleaning of reservoirs
and associated water service problems .
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN SOVERH MOVED AND COUNCILMAN MANN SECONDED
A MOTION TO RECEIVE THE FINDINGS OF FACT FROM THE PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION FOR CASE #3 -76 , A REZONING REQUEST FILED BY
MR . AND MRS . WEAVER , 2714 WEST UNION AVENUE .
In response to Councilman Mann , City Attorney
Berardini explained that the State Supreme Court has ruled
that for rezoning matters a hearing body such as City Council
is required to have findings of fact , conclusions , and
recommendations ; but the receipt of this material does not
concur with the action recommended .
Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes: Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown ,
Clay on , Taylor .
3ays : Council Member Mann .
Th M yor eclar the motion carried.
* • • • • •
COU~C LMAN BROt.'l MOVED AND COUNCILMAN CLAYTOl "ECO OED
A MOTIOt TO RECEIVE THE Rl::COMMENDATION FROM THE PLA tl GAD
ZONI m COMMI '10 RECOMM IJDING A APPEAL OF THE DECISIO! OF THE
BOARD OF ADJUST ruT AfD APPEALS REGARDING A VARIA CE TO THE SIGN
ODE FOR AZAR 'S RESTAURA,~T .
r ll , tl
Ay a : Counc 11
Y n •
Council tollow d. U on
1 ollows :
c ll 0 t;h
m r Willi m , Sov rn , Sm1t , Bro
..
• •
•
•
0
•
Februar y 17 , 1976
Page 6
~ays : Council Members Mann , Taylor .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN CLAY70N MOVED AND COUNCILM AN MANN SECONDED
A MOTION THAT THE FOLLOWIHG AMOUNTS BE CONTRIBUTED FROM THE CITY
TO THE FOLLOWING ORGANI ZATIONS : COMMUNITY ARTS SYMPH ONY -$1 ,800 ;
INTER -FAITH TASK FORCE -$5 ,000 ; CHAMBER OF CONMERCE AS A MEMBER -
SHIP -$2 ,200 ; ARAPAHOE MENTAL HEALTH -$1 ,000 ; ALCOHOL DETOXI -
FICATION CENTER -$5 ,000 ; JAYCEES OF ENGLEWOOD FOR THE PURPOSE
OF HELPING TO SPONSOR THE JULY 4TH CENTENNIAL FIRE WORKS SHOW -
$800 ; LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY -$200 .
Councilman Smith pointed out that the City Attorney
should look into the legal aspects of the City belonging to the
Chamber of Comme rce .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO AMEND THE ORIGIN AL MOTION TO DELETE "MEMBERSHIP " AND
INSERT "CONTRIBUTION " FOR THE CHAMBER OF COM!>1ERCE . Upon a call
of the roll , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Council Members Severn , Smith , Brown , Clayton .
Nays : Council Members Williams , Mann , Taylor .
The Mayor declared the amendment to the original
motion carried .
COU CIL A BROWl MOVED AND COUt CILMAN CLAYTON I::CONDED
A !10TIO TO AI-IE D THE ORIGI AL HOTIOJ FOR THE CONTRIBUTION TO
THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FRO 2 ,200 TO 5 ,000 .
A 1 cussion y Co nell fol o w d . Upon a call of the
roll , the vo e r 5ul e as o low :
Ay s :
I y
Th
c rr1
Counc 11
Th r wa s 10
motion
A
T y1or .
y
Co neil M
ouncll
rs Willi m , Brown , Clayton , Taylor .
overn , ~m1 h, Mann.
h th orig1 1 mo ion
mov to t 1 th ori in 1 motion .
mo 1 n.
, th vot on h or! in 1
low
Co nc11 M m r rown, M n , Cl ton ,
OV l'l 1
• •
-
Feb r uary 17 , 1976
Page 7
•
0 -:.
The Mayor dec l ared the motion carri ed .
* * * * * *
Mayo r Tay l or declar ed a recess at 9 :25 p .m. Council
r econvened at 9 :3 7 p .m. Upon a call of the ro ll, the follo wing
were present :
Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown , Mann ,
Clayton , Taylor .
Absent : None .
The Mayor declared a quorum present .
* * * * * *
Mayor Taylor requested a revote on agenda item 4-b .
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED AND COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED
A MOTION TO REVOTE ON A PREVIOUS MOTION TO RECEIVE THE RECOMMENDA -
TION FRO!~ THE PLANNING AND ZONIHG COMMISSION RECOMMENDING AN
APPEAL OF THE DECISION OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AND APPEALS
REGARDING A VARIANCE TO THE SIGN CODE FOR AZAR 'S RESTAURANT .
Upon a call of the roll , the revote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown ,
Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : Council Member !~ann .
Th Mayor eclar th motion carried .
• • • • • •
I TRODUCED BY COUNCILMA BRO
A BILL
FOR AI ORDI. ANCE REZONIIG A CERTAI PARCEL OF LAID WITH! THE
Cl Y OF El LEWOOD , ARAPAHOE COUilTY, S ATE OF COLORADO, FROM
HI Gil DEl ITY RE..,ID NCE ZOIIE DISTRICT , TO 2, BUSir E ZOJ E
Dl 'TRI T, AID AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZOII G MAP AC ORDI OLY .
co u
'
•
•
February 17 , 1976
Page 8
•
0 -I •
Councilman Mann stated that there had been a petition
drive once before which was voted down by the citizens for a
zone change in this area , and he further pointed out that the
Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended against this
zone for this particular area .
Councilman Brown explained that he had sponsored
this Bill so a public hearing could be held , and that a
decision by Council should not be made until after a public hearing .
Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown , Mann , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
INTRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN CLAYTON
A BILL
FOR AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND ISSUANCE OF SEWER
REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS , SERIES 1976 OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD ,
COLORADO , IN TilE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $1 ,516 ,000 FOR THE PURPOSE
OF REFUNDING OUTSTANDING SEWER REVENUE BONDS , SERIES 1975 IU
THE AMOUNT OF $1 ,550 ,000 ; PROVIDING FOR AN ESCROW TO PAY .:>AID
BONDS Arm THE I ~TERE T THEREOI ; PRESCRIBit 0 THE FORM OF SAID
REFU Dit , BOIW AND PROVID!l G FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE I ET
REVE!JUE OF THE !>EWER SY T M TO PAY THE BO DS Am THE INTEREST
THEREOf , A 1D OTHE DETAIL I CONNECTIO THERt.:WITH ; A D PRO -
VIDIIG FOR THE EFFE TIVE DATE OF THI ORDINA CL .
A
Al D I' 'UA
THE CITY 0
M n , Cl
cou
o n, · 1th, rown,
'
• •
-
•
February 17 , 1976
Page 9
Nays : None .
•
•
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
I TRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN CLAYTOU
A BILL
,_
FOR AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE WHOLE COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
MADE IN PAVING DISTRICT NO . 22 , IfJ THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO ;
APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE APPORTIONMENT OF SAID COST TO EACH
LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN SAID DISTRICT ; ASSESSING A SHARE OF SAID
COST AGAINST EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN THE DISTRICT ; PRESCRIB -
ING THE MANNER FOR THE COLLECTION AND PAYMENT OF SAID ASSESSMENTS ;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY .
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO PASS A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE WHOLE COST
OF THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE IN PAVING DISTRICT NO . 22 , IN THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO ; APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE APPORTIONMENT
OF SAID COST TO EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN SAID DISTRICT ;
ASSESSING A SHARE OF SAID COST AGAINST EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND
IN THE DISTRICT ; PRESCRIBING THE MANNER FOR THE COLLECTION AND
PAYI<IENT OF SAID ASSESSME TS ; AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY ; AND
SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR MARCH 22 , 1976 . Upon a call of the
roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown ,
Clayton , Ta yl o r .
Nays : None .
The Mayor eclare the motion carried .
• • • • * •
RE OLUTION NO . 8 , SERIES OF 1976
A RE<»OLUTION AUTHORIZING THE NOTIFICATION OF PROPERTY OWN ER OF
A..,SES MENTS FOR PAVING DI TRICT NO . 22 AN D EST ABLI HING A DATE
FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID A ES MENT •
COUNCILM AN SMITH MOVI:. A D COU CILMAN BROW ECONDED
A MOTION TO PASS RESOLUTION 0 . 8 , ERIES OF 1976 . U on a call
of h roll , th vot r ul fo low
Ay s : Council
M rm , Cl yt.on , "" ylor .
t y : on •
1 ov rn, mith , Brown , • •
,
-
February 17 , 1976
Page 10
•
0
•
I•
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO AWARD THE BID FOR THE SEWER REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
TO BOETTCHER AND COMPANY IN THE PREMIUM AMOUNT OF $5 ,569 .77 AS
RECOMMENDED BY HANIFEN , IMHOFF & SAMFORD . Upon a call of the
roll , the vote resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown ,
Mann , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
City Attorney Berardini requested that the report
concerning legal liability surrounding recommendations at
Cushing Park be tabled until he can review the conflicting
recommendations of the insurance company and the Parks and
Recreation Commission .
COUNCILMAN CLAYTON MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN
SECONDED A l-10TION TO TABLE AGENDA ITEM 5 -e , 11 REPORT FROM THE
CITY ATTORNEY CONCERNING LEGAL LIABILITY SURROUNDING RECOMMENDA -
TIONS AT CUSHING PARK ", UNTIL THE CITY ATTORNEY CAN GATHER THE
NECESSARY INFORMATION . Upon a call of the roll , the vote
resulted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Sovern , Smith, Brown ,
Mann, Clayton , Taylor .
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the mo ion carried .
h
1
cont. in \.h
111z
y
ool
* • • • • •
h or inane
11!1
• •
1-
•
Fe b ruary 17 , 19 7 6
Page 11
•
0
•
t•
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP AN AMENDED
NUISANCE ORDINANCE TO PRESENT TO CITY COUNCIL SOMETIME WITHIN
THE NEXT SIXTY DAYS . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resu l ted as follows :
Ayes : Counci l Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Brown , Mann , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
Councilman Clayton suggested that if the City adminis -
tration gets a case which the ordinance cannot handle to inform
Council so that existing problems can be made known .
• • • • • •
City Attorney Berardini reported there is a new offer
of settlement with the Valley Wa ter District law suit of 75%.
He recommended that Council not accept settling for this amount
because he feels almost all of the costs can be recovered .
He also reported that the Liquor Barn has filed suit
regarding their liquor license .
• • • • • •
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the
Assistant City Manager , Director of Finance , Dir ctor of Utilities ,
and Fire Chief o the City Man ge r regarding fir e protection
standby charges for sprinkl e r syste • He reviewed and explained
the memorandum , nd discu s i on by Counc il follow d .
COUNCILMA SOVER!I MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SMITH SECONDED
A MOTION TO DRAW UP A RESOLUTIO ELIMI ATI/0 THE FIRE PROTECTION
TANDBY CHARGES EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1 , 1977 . Upon a call of the
roll , th vot resulted as follows :
Ayes : Co neil
M nn , Cl yton , ~ ylor .
y on
Willi • Sovern , mith , Brown ,
Th Mayor c. r d h mo ion c rrie .
Ci
A ilst n Ci
Fir Tr 1n1n
• • • • •
r McCown
r n P
This
rr th
ln th
Co nell '
• •
I
•
•
February 17 , 1976
Page 12
•
0 -
approval for three out-of-state trips . One is the Fire Depart-
ment Instructors Conference in Memphis , and the other is for two
batallion chi e fs to attend the National Fire Department Manage -
ment School in Dallas . City Manager McCown explained that the
monies for these trips would come within the overall training
budget set up for each department . The conferences are for
management/administrative training .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO ALLOW THE THREE REQUESTED OUT -OF -STATE TRIPS BY THE
FIRE TRAINING PROGRAM . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted
as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams, Severn , Smith , Brown ,
Mann , Clayton , Taylor.
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the
Assistant City Manager to the City Manager regarding the Golf
Course Bid Schedule for Council 's information .
• * * • • •
Councilman Severn explained the "1976 DRCOG Weighted
Voting Formula ".
* * * * • •
COUNCILMA SOVERN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN MANN SECONDED
A MOTION TO APPOINT JO ELLE TURNER TO A FULL TERM ON THE CAREER
SERVICE BOARD . U on a call of the roll, the vote resul ed as
follow :
A
Ayes : Council
nn , Clay on , Taylor .
y Non
Tt1 M yor
Ay C cl .
M nn , Cl y on , T y . r •
mber Williams , overn , mith, Brown,
mo ion carri d.
CILMA SOVERN !::CO OED
TO THE HOUSI 0 AUTHORITY. U on
a follows:
ov rn, mith, ro
•.
'
• •
]
•
February 17, 1976
Page 13
Nays: None.
•
0
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SMITH SECONDED
A MOTION TO REAPPOINT TOM BURNS TO THE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY.
Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Severn, Smith, Brown ,
Mann, Clayton , Taylor.
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried.
* * * * * *
Councilman Mann requested that the seats be shampooed
and a general clean-up of the Council Chambers and Conference
Room A.
* * * * * *
COUNClLMAN WILLIAMS MOVED AND COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED
A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Upon a call of the
roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Severn, Smith, Brown,
Mann, Clayton , Taylor .
Nays: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried, and the City
Co uncil mee ting was adjourned a 11 :15 p .m.
•.
• •
f
1-
•
•
0 t•
•
COUNCIL CH AM BERS
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
February 17 , 1976
REGULAR MEETING :
The City Council of the City of Eng lewood , Arapahoe
County , Colorado , met in regular session on February 17 , 1976
at 7:30 p .m.
May or Taylor , presiding , called the meeting to order .
The invocation was given by Reverend David Hunter of
Hampd en Hills Baptis Church , 3095 South University . The Ple d ge
of Allegiance wa led by Boy Scou Pack 153 .
Mayor Taylor asked for roll call . Upon the call of
the r oll , the following were present :
Council Memb e rs illiam , Severn , Smith , Brown , Mann ,
Clayton , and Mayor Taylor .
Absent : None .
The Mayor declar d a uorum present .
Also present were: City Manager McCo wn
Asst . City ~ana ger Nollenberger
City Attorney Be rardin i
Acting Director of Co mmunity
Developmen Romans
irector of Finane Jam s
I I I I I I
COUi IL.•1A BR O''
A MOTIO. TO APPRO E THE ' .L
MEETI 0~ FEBPUARY 2 , 197
r a .ollow
Ay nc1
Cl y on , T y
1n: Co
c. •
T yor th
I
rr •
SMITH SECO lDED
r AR CITY COUNCIL
h roll , the vote
1 h , Brown, Mann,
10 ca rr1 d .
I I I
•.
'
•
,
•
•
February 17 , 197G
Page 2
•
•
I •
COU! CILMA!J MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN WILLIA~1S SECONDED
A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE PECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEET-
ING ON FEBRUARY 9 , 1976 . Upon a call of Lhe roll , the vote
resulted as follow :
Clayton. Ayes: Council Membera Williams , Sm ith , Brown , Mann,
Abstain: Council Members Sovern , Taylor.
Nays : !lone .
The May or declared he motion carried.
* * * * *
Nay or Tay o~ reselttc rc o tion to John C. Ma xw ell
for his years of ou s~anding service o the commun ity of Englewood
and a a member of he L1 rary Board .
RESOLUTION 10 . 9, SERIE OF 197
A RE OLUTIO COH :E DilW JOHt. .; . M11XWELL OF E GLEWOOD , COLORADO ,
FOR LOY L AND DEVOTED ERVIC'• u .. HI COMMUNITY AS A MEMBER OF
THE ENGLEWOOD PUBLI LIBRARY bOAR
A MOTION TO PA
of th roll , h
Ayt. : Co 11 1 r mo r
Mann , 1 y on , T y or .
•
to receive the resolution and
, ~o vern, Smi h , Brown,
ot.1on c t'l 1
• • •
'
• •
-
•
•
February 17, 1976
Page 3
•
0
•
the details of the proposed establishment . He s~ated that the
liquor license needs to be renewed an then transferred .
City A torney Berar ini di agreed with this process .
He sta ed there may be problems becau e this liquor license was
not renewed at the first o the year so there is no license in
effect . He requested ~hat his item be tabled until more infor-
mation can be received .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED AND COUNCILNAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO POSTPONE THIS ACTION UNTIL THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL
MEETING ON MARCH 1 , 1976 . Upon a call of the roll , the vote
resul ed as follows:
Ayes: Cou cil Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Br own ,
Mann , Clay on , Taylor .
Nays : i one .
The Mayor declared he mo~ion carried .
* * * * * *
Oliver Gisebur ,
re resentin he Englewood
resolution in objec ion o the
insurance and how they elim1na
agencies from articipa ing in
was read by he ity l~rk.
St re , was present
ror ro He bmi~ ed a
specifica ions for he City 's
alm of h Englewood
the b1jdjnb. 7he reso ution
Or nance
nlch ca se
5 , Series
hese
t.. is o.
was rec 1ved
,_
• •
•
•
•
0 -
February 17, 197
Page 4
Ay s: Counc 1 Members Williams , Severn , Sm ith , Brown , Mann , Clay on , Taylor .
Nays : None.
ThP ~ayor d~clare he mo ion carried .
Herb Mosbarger, 2250 West Wesley , Acting Chairman of
he Northwes . En lewood Action Group, was present to di scuss
the threa s to close Scen ic View School . He st ated that more
people and children ar~ needed in the area , and that re zoning
to R-2-C should 11 ·lp ~1ld up he area . The Sch ool Board has
given a deadlin• at. Harch 8 for their decision , and Mr .
Mosbar er sked to Council 's ooperation and help . He stated
that plans for mor f m1ly hous ng coul effect the ecision of the School Board .
aft-er the
deve ope
P' .nin
n ~OVPrt pointed ou tha this is working
a comprel ensive plan needs to be
a Joint meeting of Counci an the
ion to J1 cuss this situation .
t;OU CIL' r. 1A MOVED AND COUNCILMA J SMITH SECONDE A
MO'!'IO REQUESTI 'I CITY STAFF TO ET UP A MEET! G BETWEE CITY
COUNCIL , PLA NING AND ZONI G COf>'JHSSIO J , AN t ORTH WEST ENGLEWOOD
A TION ROUP REGARD!." THE S TUATI01 AT SCENIC VIEW SCHOOL .
roll , h
~.ann ,
y
T
o nell ~llowed . Upon a call of th e
ollow. :
ov rn , mith , Bro wn,
on : r1 d .
• It •
a
•
" on h
r.: in of
'
,
• •
(
(
•
February 17 , 1976
Page 5
•
•
(b) Minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commiss ion
meeting of January 20 , 197 6 .
(c) Financial Report as of December 31 , 1975 for
the Fire Pension Fund .
(d) Financial Re ort as of December 31 , 1975 for
the Police Pension Fund.
(e) Financial Report as of December 31 , 1975 for
the Em loyees Reti rement Pensio Fund.
(f) Memorandum o the City Manager from the Director
of Utili ies regarding cleaning o f reservoirs
and as~oci ed wa er service problems .
* * * * * *
COUNCILMA, SOVERI.J MOVED AND COU CILMAN MANN SECONDED
A MOTIO TO RECEIVE THE FI!JDINGS OF FACT FRO~l THE PLANNING AND
ZONING COMMISSION FOR CASE *3 -76 , A REZONI G REQUEST FILED BY
MR . AID MRS . WEAVER, ~714 WEST UNION AVE UE .
In res on e o Councilman ~~nn, City Attorney
Berardini explained ha the State Supreme Co rt has ruled
that for rezoning matter a hearing body such as City Council
is r equired t o have findings of fact , conclusions , and
recommendation s ; but the receipt of this mater ial does not
concur with the action recommended .
,. -
Upon a call of the ro 1 , the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council .embers Williams, Severn, Smith, Brown ,
c ay on , Taylor .
• ays: Co 1 cil mber M nn .
~he Mayor e lared he mo io carried .
* • • • •
lew d. Upon a call or the
rol , h
Ay s: W 1 1 m , Sove rn, Smith, Brown,
Cl yt.cn .
•
,
1-
•
•
, .
•
February 17 , 197
Page
~~av <:ouncll !l!embers Hann , Ta ylor .
The ayvr declared the motio~ carried .
* * * * * *
COU1~CILMAN CLAY70f MOVED AND COUNCILMAN MAIW SECONDED
A MO -oN TH T Tr E FOLLO'ti !!G AI10UNTS BE CO,~TR IBUTED FROM THE CITY
TO THE FOLLOWING ORGANIZ :'101'4.~: COMMUNITY ARTS SYMPHONY -$1 ,800 ;
INTER -FAI TH TASK 0 CE -$5, OC J ; CHAMBER OF COt-lMERCE AS A MEMBER -
SHIP -$2 ,200 ; ARA AHOE F.IJ':',., HEALTH -U ,OOO ; ALCOHOL DETOXI -
FICATIOt CE NTER -5 ,000; JAYCEES OF EN GLEWOOD FOR THE PURPOSE
OF HELPING TO SP O SO. 'lHE JU LY 'lTH CWTE~ liAL FIRE WORKS SHOW -
$8 00 ; LEAGUE OF WO~ffi VOTERS OF ARAPAHOE COUNTY -$200.
Counc1lma. ~mlth ointe o
shoul look in o h ~egal aspec
hat the City Attorney
Ci y be onging to the
Gharnoer of Co~~erc .
o.. the
mo ion
Ay s :
MOVED i< COUli ILMAI SOVERN SECONDED
ORIG INAL MOTION TO ELETE "MEMBERSHIP" AND
FOR THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE . Upon a call
resulttd as fol lows:
oun !1 Members Sovern , Smith , Brown , Clayton .
ays: Co rei em era W11 lams, Mann , Taylor .
d clar th _en m n to the original
•
February 17, 1976
Page 7
•
0
•
I •
The Mayor declared he motion carried .
* * * * * *
•
Mayor Taylor declared a reces~ at 9 :25 p .m. Co un c il
reconvened a 9:37 p .m. Upon a call of the roll , the fol l owi ng we r e present :
Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brown , Ma nn , Clayton , Taylor .
Absen : None .
Th Mayor declared a quorum pr sen
* * * * * *
ayor Taylor requested a revote on agen a item 4-b .
COU CILJilAN CLAYTO MOVED AND OUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED
A MO"'IO TO REVOTE ON A PREVIOUS MOTION TO RECEIVE THE RECO MM ENDA -
T 0 FROM THE PLA Nif G AND ZO ING COMM.ISSI0:-1 RECOMMENDING AN
APPEAL OF THE DECISiot OF THE BOARD OF ADJ U""TJI~E T AND APPEALS
REGARDING A 'ARIANCE TO THE SIGN CODE FOR AZAR 'S RESTAURANT .
U on cal of the rol , the revo e re ulted as follows :
Aye : Co nell ~ .bers Williams , overn , Smith , Br o wn , Cl y ·o n , T ylor •
• Jays : \:a
Th l>l.ayor
H TRO CE!)
r .• .. ann .
h mo !o c rri
• • • • •
BR
.!.L
ITHI TH
R R-
ZONE
OLY •
-
February 17 , :d76
Page 8
zone
':his Bill
ecision
e r!n~.
Upor a c. J.-
Ay C unci ...
. •.anr., c y o•1, Taylor .
ays: one .
The .a yor d •
r '
•
0 -
here ha been a petition
own by the ci izens for a
lurther pointe out that the
har. r commen ed agains his
h t he
he d ,
unti
r.e r·ol , r ~: vote resu
villiams , Severn , mi h , Br own ,
the ~otion carried.
* * * * * •
A BILL
l ' ov rn ,
ALE
OF
p
J"OWn ,
-
(
February 17 , 197
Page 9
Nays : None .
•
,. -
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
I TRODUCED BY COUNCILMAN CLAYTON
A BILL
FOR AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE WHOLE COST OF THE IM PROVEMENTS
MADE IN PAVING DISTRICT NO . 22 , IN THE CITY OF ENGLEW OOD , COLORA DO ;
AP PROVING AND CONFIRMI!JG THE APPORTIONMENT OF SAID CO ST TO EACH
LOT OR TR ACT OF LAND I SAID DISTRICT ; ASSESSI NG A SHAR E OF SAI D
COST AGAINST EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND IN THE DIST RICT ; PRESCR I B-
ING THE MANNER FOR THE COLLECTION AND PAYMENT OF SAID ASSESS MENTS;
AND DECLARING AN EMERGEN Y.
COUNCILMA CLAYTON MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECO NDED
A MOT:ON TO PASS A BILL FOR A ORD ANCE APPROVI NG THE WHOL E CO ST
OF THE IMPROVEME TS MADE I~ PAVING DIST RICT NO . 22 , IN THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD , COLORADO ; APPROVING AND CO FIRMING THE APPORTIO MENT
OF SAID COST TO EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LAND I SAID DISTRICT ;
ASSESSING A SHARE OF SAID OST AGAINST EACH LOT OR TRACT OF LA ND
IN THE DISTRICT ; PRESCRIBING THE MA NER FOR THE COLLECTION AND
PAYMENT OF SAID ASSESSME TS ; AND DECLARING AN EME RGENCY ; AN D
SETT IN G A PUBLIC HEARI!G FOR MARCH 22 , 1976 . Up on a call o f the
roll , the v ot e resulte as follo ws :
Ayes : Co neil Members Williams , Sovern , Smith , Br o wn ,
Clayton , Ta y l o r .
Nays: ,one .
The M yor eclar he r:10 io c rr1
• • • • •
RESOLUTIQ, '0 . , SERIES 0 l 76
' SECC OED
Jpon c ll
Ay
M nn , Cl y o
Will~ s , Sov rn , mith , Brown ,
aya: :on •
• •
,
-
•
February 7, '976
Fage 1 0
•
0 -I •
The Mayor ecla~e-the ~otion carried .
* * * * * *
COUNCILrt.AN ;v; NN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN SECONDED
A MOTION TO AWARD THE Bl F'OR THE SEWER REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS
TO BOETTCHER AND COT~PANY I THE PREMIUM AMOUNT OF $5 ,569 .77 AS
RECOMMENDED BY HANIFFN , IMHOFF & SAMFORD . Upon a call of the
roll , the vote resu ted as follows :
Ayes : Council Members Williams , Severn , Smith , Brow n,
!•!ann , Clayton , Tayl0r .
Nay one .
The , .ayor declared the motion carried .
* * * * * *
City A torney Be r ardini requeste d that the report
concerning legal 1abil1 y surroundi ng recommendations at
ushin P rl< be tnb l d •..m il he can review the conflicting
r commenda ions o the insurance company and the Parks and
. ecreation Cor.~is~ion .
OU ~IL~AN CLAYrO MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SOVERN
E 0 WED A !"'OTION 0 TABLE A E DA ITEM 5-e , "REPORT FROM THE
CITY ATTORNEY O:CERfi G LEAL LIABILITY SURROUNDING RECOMMENDA -
TIO S AT ~· SHL'O PARK ", UNTIL THE CITY ATTORNEY CAN GATHER THE
ECE SARY <FOR~ T ;,, Upon call of the roll , the vote
r s l d
m, Cl
filemters i ll iams , Severn , Smi h , Brown ,
c re h mo ion carri d .
* I
or 1n nc
1a
'
•
February 17, 1976
Page 11
•
•
,_
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED AND COUllCILMAN SOVERt SECONDED
A MOTION TO DIRECT THE CITY ATTORNEY TO DRAW UP AN AMENDED
NUISANCE ORDINANCE TO PRESENT TO CITY COUNC L SO~ffiTIME WITHIN
THE NEXT SIXTY DAYS . Upon a call of the roll , the v ote resu lted
as follows :
Ayes : Counci: Members Wi lliams , Seve r n , Smith , Brown,
Ma nn , Clayton , Taylor .
Nays : None .
The Mayor declared the mot i on carried .
Councilman Clay on suggested that if the City adm i nis -
tration gets a case which the ordinance cannot handle to inform
Council so that existing problems can be made known .
* * * !I * •
City At orney Berardini reported there is a new o ffe r
of settlement with he Valley Water Di trict law suit of 75%.
He recommended that Council not accept set ling for this amount
because he feels a mos all of the costs can be recovered .
He also reported that the Liquor Barn has filed suit
regarding their liquor license .
* * * * * *
City Manager McCown presented a memorandum from the
Assistant City Manager , Director of Finance , Director of Util i ties ,
and Fire Chief to the City Manager regarding fire protection
stan by charges for prinkler systems . He reviewed and e x plai ned
he menor ndun , isc ssion by Council followed .
COUNCILMAN SOVER11 MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SMITH SECONDED
A MOTIOt TO DRAW UP RESOLUTION ELI INATING THE FIRE PROTECTION
TANDBY CHARGES EFFE TIVE JA UARY 1 , 1977 . Upon a call of the
ro 1, the vo e res l ed a. follows:
Ayes: Co ell M~mb rs Willi ns, Sov rn , Smith , Brown ,
~ nn, C y on, Tay or .
T
Ci
Assist t Ci
Fir Tra1n1n
y 'on
yor he motion c rri d .
I I I I I I
d or nd m from the
D1r c~or r ardin the
moran a for Co nc 1l • s
'
•
,
-
•
•
0 -
Feor~ary 17, 1976
Pagt: 12
approval for three out -of-state trip3 . One is the Fire Depart -
~ent Ins ructors Confere ce in Memphis , and the other is for two
batallion chiefs to attend the National Fire Depa rtmen t Man age-
ment School in Dallas . City Manager McCown explained that the
monies for these trips would come within the overall training
b dget set up for each department . The conferences are for
management/a ministrative training .
COUNCILMAN SMITH MOVED AND COUNCILMA SOVER N SECONDED
A MOTIO TO ALLO~ THE THREE REQUESTED OUT -OF -STATE TRIPS BY THE
FIRE TRAINING PRO RAM . Upon a call of the roll , the vote resulted
as follows :
Ay s : ounc
M nn, C ayton , Taylor •
Memb r3 Williams , Sovern , Smith, Bro wn ,
. Jays: one.
The Mayor declared the motion carrie •
• • * * * *
City .<lana r ·:ccown presen ted a memorandum from the
~an~ City Manager to the City Manager regarding the Golf
e B1 chedu e or Council 's information .
• * * • *
n overn explained the "1976 DRCOG Weighted
Vo .!n Fo
A
ows:
n , C
I:
T • Cl
. , . . . .
' 'OVE~ MOVED AND COUNCI MANN SECONDED
0 ELLE, TURNER TO A FULL TERM 0 THE CAREER
ca 1 o he ro , the vote r u ted as
a, Sov rn , m1 t , ro
cl re th ~tio c rrl d .
VE A '0 COU CILMA SOVE ~CO. 0 D
S TO THE HOUSl 0 AUTHORITY. U on
ult d a follows:
ra ov rn, 1th ,
'
•
(
February 17, 1976
Page 13
Nays: None .
. '
•
0
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
COUNCILMAN MANN MOVED AND COUNCILMAN SMITH SECONDED
A MOTION TO REAPPOINT TOM BURNS TO THE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY .
Upon a call of the roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Williams, Severn, Smith, Brown, Mann, Clayton , Taylor.
Nays: None .
The Mayor declared the motion carried .
• • • • • •
Councilman Mann requested that the seats be shampooed
and a gene ral clean-up of the Council Chambers and Conference Room A.
• • • • • •
COUNCILMAN WILLIAMS MOVED AND COUNCILMAN BROWN SECONDED
A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING. Upon a call of the
roll, the vote resulted as follows:
Ayes: Council Members Willi ams , Severn, Smith, Brown, Mann, Clayton , Taylor.
Nays: None.
The Mayor declared the motion carried, and the City
Council meeting was adjourned a 1 :15 .m.
'
• •
t
1-
•
•
•
•
0 -
INTRODUCED GY COLI 1C ILMP I CLAYTOII
PY AUTHOP JTY
OfDlNAtiCE t:O. _B_, SERIES 197fi
t~:J (JPUI'.l~:HT AUt'tiOHill 'F:; 'IJI E SAlt; r,ND T~SUANCE
Ll' !il h U~ l I . .'l '~UE I· ~.!'UNO lflG l~O:JOS , Sl R 1 ES 19 7 6 OF
J/1~ Cl rY Uf' l'olii,U;OOD, COLQRAUO IN TilE PRI'lCJPAL
;,:• IJ:;T OF $1, Sl6 , 000 f0R THE PURPOSE OF REFUNDING
tcu·rsu.J,DlflG SHiE R REVENUE BONDS, SF RJES 1975 IN
IHt; /.'"•lnlT OF $1,5>0,000; PROVIDI!'OG FOR AN LSCROW
TO P AY SAID BONDS AND THE !Nff'Rt:ST THE.REON;
PRESt RIB NG I /IE I'OIU1 OF SAID REI UNIHNG BONDS A"iD
PROVIDING fOR 'fl!f; APPLICATION Of' THE NET REVENUE
Of' 1JI E SH.J'R SYS'rEM 10 PAY TilE lll::li'S AND THE
IN1f'PI:s·r lH.HfO'l, AND OTift:R DETAILS IN <.:O~"'ECTlO N
THf~E.w!TH; ll"lD PI<OVIDf';G f >R THE Hff.CT!Ii£ OAT£
OF TB IS C'RO It.ANCE.
'lllRFAS, th C• y o! rn~l"" , Ar pdhoe County,
llome Rule Clty of the St te of C' lor do, en at d and op ratin9
pursuant to Art1cle XX o! th Conatttut1on of s id State a nd
a Homo Pule Ch•rt r (th •ch • .t.rt r•l 1"1 pt d and from time to
e tht r ~' h; dnd
liJIERI:.AS, h C1ly of En~l "' Colurado, h a pre-
S<'n a I 5, da e d M rch 1, 1975, 1n the amount of $1,550,000
(hcrPln the "1975 Ia ue"), o! wh1~h th ent1r ~mount n
of $5,000 c ,·h, nu l-t>n•d 1 to lJO 1ncluuve, Loeannq Interes t
p yabla &t!JIU.)nnu.Jlly on .Much ber l dCh y ar,
b<-1n9 nu ert>d and lfta unn9 on th let 1ay of S•·~ te r aa
Col 1 ••
nd ,,u!!~l ra
!All lncluuv
I • ll
14 -7 . -42
4). ~1
I • 1)
4 0
I • 10
1976
1977
1971 ,.,,
1 0
1 II
lt 110 -17 IUl I 0 -I 0 I 4 I I • 1n I I H • I ' I I -12 1 I s I 7t I no IUO
·•·
•.
• •
,
-•
0
•
and
WH£Rf'AS, bonds of th1s I ssul:! l"'aturinq ln the yea r a
1985 and lhP r c after, be>ng bonds nu~Ler ed 151 to 310 , incl u sive,
are red c e mdb1e at the option of the C1ty o n Septembe r l , 19 84
and on any 1nterest raym nt date th reafter , in inverse n umerica l
order, upon payment of par and accrued interest ; a nd
WH~REAS, the City Council of said City, pursu ant t o
Chapter X, Part JII, Sec ion 106 o f ita Charter , as a m n d e d,
ts a uthortzed to tssue r ~fundinq rev nue bonds of said s wer
sy-t ~ fo r the purpose of z funding outstanding sewe r hondo of
the C1ty, pi dg1ng to the p yment of sa1d nds the revenu a
derived and to be dortved fr~ t he op rat>on of said sewe r
ayst m; and
WHEREAS, the City t.aa heretofore auth nzed and
1asued 1 a R fundinq S wer R venue Bonds, s~riea 1962, d• ed
Nov mber 1, 1962 (hereln lh •1 62 Bonds") in th origt na l
pr1nc1pal amount of $1,022,000, the ~roc da o f ~ 1c h were
d poo i ted t nto a sp c 1al acruw whtch wao st•bliah d at
the F1r1l Na Jonal Bank, Enql ~OOd, Color•do, such eacr
be1ng suffict.,nt lo pay a ll J•rtnCipa l of, 1n •r • on and
prior cede p ton pr Mlum tn conn ctton wtth all or he
C1ty'a OY~AtAndlnq w r da: and
WH N£AS, Ordln nco
l&IU n e o r h l p tiOI a
to uau d o
r • "
fl y II
rn n h
·f·
ch •u h ri~ed the
d tion4l rev nu bond s
on a p.eri ty
11 VHh
it j nal
'
• •
I
•
0 t•
•
WlitREAS 1 the C.1ty Council spccJ.fi cal ly finds
und determines that:
1. The Ctty 1s curren t in the accumulated
Englewood Sc-..·er Refundtng Revcnu Bonds , Sertcs 1962,
Reserve Fund (hcre1n "Reserve Fund" or ~Reserve Fund 1962")
as requ1rcd by Or d1nance No. 28 whi c h au horizcd the 1962
Donds, and that such cond itions will prevail a lhe time
of issuance of the par1ty r v~nue r e fund1ng bonds authorized
by th1s Ordinanc and
2 . Th annual ne r ev.-nuea der1ved from the
op rattan of 5atd s wer syst m for he f1scal year tm~edta ely
prec d1n9 the date of >ssudnce ot he 1975 p <>ty l>en obl1-
gat1ons authortzed by Ordtnance No. 4, Ser1es 1975, refunded
nd replaced here1n, and av 11 ble to be d~l s1 ed tnto nd
used !or the purpose o! he R s rve Fund for th$ 1962 Bonds
mount r preo nt1n9 150\ or the
maximum annual prlnctpAl
outot ndin9 par>ty lt~n
nd in ere•t r qu1rementa on the
ndo and o her parity lien obll9a-
t1001 of h Ctty paya le fro• and cono 1 utin9 a ljen on
the rev nues or the oys , and h nda lsou d ( xcludlnQ
rea rvea); and
~11f .PEAS , au Ord1n nee No. 21 •Hs a 1 lone!
reveny banda or relu dtn~ r v n bonda to 111u d to be
p yable frOM >n ard rev nu riv he 01• re >on
•.
'
• •
I
]
•
t•
•
of said sC'we r syst(·m on a par1ty w1.th the 1962 Bonds pro-
Vldcd thal the C1ty has ccmlplJcd with certdtn rC'quirernen ta
concerntng the issuance o f ad 1t1onal par1ty l1en bonds as
~ore sp@Cl!t~alli ou tltned 1n said Ordinance; nd
~1H:.FfAS, xt:e pt s aforcttaid, the Ctty h•s never
pledged nor in ~:tny way hyr)ot.h c ted revenu .s dert\' d and to
be dcrtved frum the op rattan of the uttllty, or any part
tht.:r of, Lo the payment ot any bonds or for any other pu r -
se, w1th the r ault that the revenues to be d~tlved (ro~
lh •yat • may not be pledged lawfu lly and 1rrevocably or
the P"Y'" nt o f th adoh l10nal refund1ng bonds payable from
c v nu~a d~rtv~d from the opera ion o f the system, •nd
WHlREAS, he C1ty f1nds and determ1nes tha t by
refund1nq the 1975 Issue, h p r1nc1pal moun and the
toter at rate on he outatan tnq 1975 Issue w1ll be reduced,
r aul 1ng in d•creas d borrow1ng coata; and
~HfR EAS, by such refund1ng cerla>n covenants
rela ing to d po5lls to th R s rve Fund Wlll be ~lfted
•n order to fa c tl>tate cap1 al ••randiturea and financing
ekpec ed to b n c ••ry ln •he fu ure; and
WHEREAS, the Ctty counc1l has by reao lut1on
prov1ded for th pu l1c sale of aald ref nd1ng bo~ s, and
foll 1ng the rec1pt of btds ------------------------------
----------------------------------------praa
he C1ty sh 11 ~•rd the l nda1 and
II
lnt r a
·•·
'" of
t a d t l ~ndi n c n
of t e c ty ~ tn
Ita nla Ita ••1
•.
'
• •
,
-
'
•
•
•
•
0 , .
•
BE IT OR~AINED BY THE CITY COUNCI L OF THE
C ITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO:
Sect~on 1. Authorization. That for he purpose
of provtding funds to r efund the City's Sewer Revenue Benda,
Ser1es 1975, dated March 1, 1975, outstanding 1n the amount
of $1,550,000, there are hereby authorized Sewer Rev nue
Refundinq Bonds, Series 1976, of he City o f Enqlewood, in
he principal amount of $1,516,000 (h rein the "1976 Bonds"),
both the principal hereof and he interest ther of to be
payable solely and only out of the n revenue •nd tnco to
be derived from the operation of its s wer system, as h re-
inafter set forth, pursuant to the prov1a1ona of Chapter X,
Part 111, Sectton 106 of the Charter of t~e City of Enqlewood,
and satd bonds are sold to ------------------------------------
S ction 2. Bond Deta1ls. The bonds shall be
neqot1able in fora, payable to bearer, shell be dated March 1,
1976, consistinq of 304 bonds, bonds numbered 1 to 303, inclu-
sive beinq in the d nomination of $5,000 each, end bond nuabered
304 bein9 1n the denom1na ion of $1,000, shall bear interest
from date to e ur1 y, 1ntsrest be n paya Is on Septeaber 1,
lt7 , and •••>annually therear er on h let day of March
and he 1st day or s pte~ r each y ar, and shall aature
s rully
Ao!Oun
70,000
1'),000
0,000
n.ooo
• ,0 0
~.o o
r 1 as foll s:
197
1917
1971 ,
1910
1911
'
• •
'
•
•
• •
•
Amou nt
100,000
110,0 00
11 0,000
1 25 ,00 0
130,000
135,000
14 5,000
155,000
16,000
•
•
lltur i t_l.
1~82
1983
198 4
198 5
1986
198 7
198 8
1989
1990
t•
Bonds matur~nq o n SPptt:mbe r 1, 19 85 and thereafter
are rcd ~c mablc at the op ion of the C1ty on Septembe r 1 , 1 9 8 4 ,
~nd on any in t e re s t payment date th reafler , i n inverse
numer1cal order, upon paymrnt of par and accr ued intereat.
Notice o f any p ri o r redempt1on s hall be qiven b y
the D1rec t o r of F1nanco, e x -o fft clo City Clerk and Treasure r
of the City:
1) By publtcat1on of such not t ce at lPast once,
not l ess han th trly d.•ya 1 r to tt1c re>demp ion date,
tn a newspaper publish d •nd of general ci r cu l•tton tn
the Ctty 1 and
2 ) By s nd1nq • copy of such not1ce by reqi s-
•d Un1 d States
d le o:
a) The ori9l al pur ha r ot ·~ nds,
b) R c.,
c) Th paytn nt.
Such notl e s•. 11 1• ., fy
0 so
•e d • d ,, d ""11 fur h r
at. te th• on be pa d, a
II
' • •
-
'
•
•
•
•
0
•
.1nd 1 1y 1hle on t h e t<"'d 01pt1on d 1t c so d«::siynated; .Jn d upon
J'rt,fut~rton tl•··t10f, tr.JJtrh.,t--..1 h the lppurt,~nan t cou pons
11.1lu r 1ng s l>!>,e,Ju·•ut-o thQ r 1 r ion date , the Ci ty shall
ply the L0nd o r Oonds so call~d for r r d ~mo tton.
The pr1ncipal c.lno unt of and Intere st on sa1d Lond s
~ha ll be p...a:,d bl 1n lawful noney of the Un i ed States of
1\mt..;t ic-a , at t he Ftrst Nat.1 on al B.1nk, r:nglf'wood, Colorado.
Sc ttnn 3. ~e~ial_Qhli ation~. All of the bonds,
lo~ethcr with the interest accruing hereon , shall be paya ble
.1nd collcct1ble bO l e ly out o f the net income to be derjved
from the opl'ration of the ·;uw r system, he income of wh ich
is so plcdged: the hold r o r holdt•ra the reof may not l ook o
any gcn ral or oth~r fund for the J••ymP nt of principal o f and
in crest on such o ltgal1ons , xc p the d~&l1n a L d s pecial fund
p ladycd lh~ref o r; and auch h ~d1 •hall not conat1 ute a n tnd bled-
ness nor a drbt w1th1n Lhe ~antnq of th~ Charte r or any constitu-
tJon•l or statutory provtaJon or ll~it•tion: nor sha ll they be
cona11 red or h~ld to be q n r o l>qettona of he City.
f'ctton 4 .
sh•ll be a19n•d W>th
th~ Ctty,
or P ·n~. The bonds
ure of the Mayor o t
c:hed
ah 11 b •r he (~caimlle &1 n t u 1e of lh 0 r Cor ot Ptn•nce,
~ n l&lu d •• •f r •••d a 1•rt ot • >d bonda, auch 1n ereat
c:o na a •11 ~ the
to lr rt .
ai natu r • •ra
10
n
o.
n lnq t ll!l• •ana or
lie: r w .,.
or he in••r
r
• l1
·1·
City .-c:ordtnCj
n .t or h .. tle
at cou na •t ec ed
ry th nda
•11
Ill a Ia lly
'
• •
•
•.
0
•
(FQrm CJ f Dond)
I !'I I I D >HIITES Of' IIMt.RJCA
ST/1 E OF COL( I•AUO
COU NTY OF /\RJ\1'1\HOE
C:H Y OF ;r,r.l H·OOD
SF\•tR ll f VI'•~E ktFUNDING fi•·ND, SERIES 1976
Sl,OOO
No. SS,OOO
The C1ty of fn9lcwood, i n th roun ty of Ar r~hoa
and Stut of Color~do , hereby promises to pay to the b~arer
hereof, out o£ the special fund or funds hereinafter d Slgnated,
but not o th• J WIS C, the prtnc1pal sum o f
F'~~~ TIIOUSAND DOLLARS
o n he lst day of Spe ,mbcr, 19 , 1~ith interest th r on a t
the r te o f Jl(!-T centum _,)
1 r .1n n u , P• ytb le on Scot mb r l, 1976 nd t-mldnnua lly thore-
at r on th !at day of Plarch and he 1st day o! s .. pt cm ber
•
, Color 1o, u n pr n r a t ion nd aurr nd r o! he
co t n1 tnd 'hll nd a y • v rally bt e du •
ring n or b Co r e Scp t ~b~r 1,
4, a all n l to th i r turily
t •· londa tu••~~ in hey ara 1 91 nd th t t ft r, •r•
in nv r1 11
or r, •
ll c ty
• •
,
'
•
•
•
•
0 , .
•
of Englewood, Colorado , for the purpose of prov1d1ng funds
to refund and pay outstanding sewer r even ue bonds of the
City , unde r the auLhoriLy of and in full conformity wi h
the City Charter and the Constitution of the State of
Colorado, and pursuan t to Ord 1nance No. of said
C>ty, f>nally ~doptcd and approved by the C>ty Council.
Both the ptln~ipal of and the interest on this
Bond are payable solely out of a special fund created in
full conformtty Wlth law and d signated as the "1976 Sewer
Revenue Rcfund1ng Bond and Interest Fund", of the C1 ty, into
which Fund he City covenan s and agrees to deposit, from
th net 1ncome and rev nue of the sanitary sewer system,
amounts suffic1ent to pay the pr1ncipal of and interest on
thts Bond, when the s~me b~come due and payable.
If necessary payment of principal and inter st
shall b made from the reserve fund created for such purpose,
all as ia more particularly set forth in he Ordinanc
authoriz>nq the >ssuance of lh1a Bond. The bonds of th>s
1aaue are equitably and ratably secured by a l1en on the net
incom and r v•nue of th aa nita ~y sewer ayat mf and con-
atltu e an Irrevocable and f1rst lten (but not nec~asarily
•n excluaJVf' ftrat lten) on lh uf't 1nco .. and revenue, on
a par>ty with th l>en of t e outstanding R Cund1nq S w r
R venue 8 'nds, Ser1ea 19 2, of th City, da d Nov •ber 1, 19 2.
It u her by r ll . c rt fl and w•rrant d hat
!or the pay,..nt ot thu 11 nd, he CHy of £nqlf'W has
c real d and w>ll 10a1ntun ··~d rund nd > 11 d posi therein
he •~un a nd rev no •r C'lfl d 1n •••d Ordinanc-e, nd out
of sa1d rund, • oln ur vo I• h r . ' n, wlll p y
thu nd nd th Ill t It . n, 1n r pr vi d
by aald Ord 11 nc I r • npt1 n cf ai und nd t
...
•.
'
• •
,
]
•
•
•
•
•
•
nature and extent of the security af(orded thereby for the
payment of this Bond, reference is made to tha t Ordinanc~.
Th1s Bond cloes not constitute a debt or indebtPdness
of he Clly of Lnglcwood within he mran1ng of any charte r,
cons ttutional or statutory limita ion, and shall not be
constdercd or held to be a general oblJgation of the City.
It is hereby certified and recited that all the
requirements of law have been fully complied with by the
proper officers of the City in the issuance of this Bond.
For the payment of this Bond and the interes t
thereon, the Ctty of Eng l ewood pledges the exercise of all
its lawful powers.
IN T~STlM NY WHEREOF, th Ctly Counci l of the Ctty
of Englewood, Colorado, has caused thls Bond to be signed
w1th the facaimtle signAture of the ~yor, sealed w1th •
fa csim1le of the seal of the C1ty, attested and coun ter-
signed by the manual signature of the Director of Finance,
ex-off>cio Ctty Clerk and Treasure·, and the attach d coupona
to be 11gn d with the !acaimlle Slgnature of the Dtr@ctor of
Finance, aa of the 1st day of March, 1976.
CITY OF ENGLEWOO D, COLORADO
(rACSIHlLE SEAL)
By (Facalm!le ~natur_e_) __ __
M•yor
ATTESTED AND COUNT RSIC" Dt
·1 •
'
• •
-•
0
•
(Form of nterest Coupon)
No.
March,
On the 1 st day Qf September, 19 __ , unless the
Bond to wh1ch th1s coupons ts ttached, tf rede em able, has
been called for prior rcd(·mption, he C'i ty of Englewood,
in the County of Arapahoe and State of Colorado , will pay
t o bearer the amount shown hereon tn L l ... •ful money of the
United States of Amertca, at the r1rst ~J tiona! Bank, i n
Englewood, Colorado, ou t of the Speci ~l Fund or Funds re-
ferred o in sa1d Bond, b u t not othet t •e, being lnterea t
then du on 1 a Scw~r Rev~nu R fund1 nq Banda, Sertes 1976 ,
dated March 1, 1976, be•r1n9 No.
-11 -
(Flcsimtle St nature)
OtlreciOr o F inance
•.
• •
,
-
•
•
0
•
Section 5. D1~posi~icn o f. nond Pro<:.£.~. The pro-
ceeds derived from lhe sale o f · .. ,e g,..,,,u r Revenue Refunding
Rands authorized herein , in n urr.o unt no t less han Sl,Sl6,000,
and th e acL·rued in r s on he e nds b!'i ng rc f un ded, sha 11 be
dcpo!ij t~d Wtth tho Flr !l> '.',J 1onal Bank , En gl ewood, Co lorado
(hc r l.'inafter the "'Bc1n ''), 1n a ;cpa rate fund and es c row accoun t
hPrcby cc('a e d un d kr.o .... n itS the "City o f Eng l c'A·ood Sewe r Rev enue
Bo nds , Ser1es 197S Escrow Account", h e rein de si gnated aa the
"Re funding Escrow Accoun t" or "E scrow 1\ccou nt'", ~Nh ic h accoun t
bhall be a all imes suf fl ciant, toge the r wi th any intereat
to be de rtVtl>d from t he invcs m nt and an y t emporary rei n veat-
ro nt o f the de post t s, or any t·art lhf"r<'o f, 1n d i rect o bl igationa
o C o r obliq a tton a quarant <·d by th lin> e>d S ates of .t.merica,
o pay he prtnctpal of and int r ~· on the outstand i ng 1975
laaue o be ret1red, at heir rP &f t vema urt t .ea, as f o llowa:
I_ 7S •~!_!:
he
Banda nu~bered 1 to )10 , Jncluaive , m•tu rinq
tn the yeara 1976 to
and retir d at h lr r •t· ~ 1ve maturity date •,
•~co rdtnq o thetr OrL9in•l t••·
Inter•• on he bonda o f t e I 7S raau ahall be pa i d aa
•a C'C'ru•••, a cordin'l 0 tt or q n al .. , • of said bonda,
un tl lld nda t.l.lre.
If for y r ... n, any '1 the ru da on hand
In 'J " 11'\a tflcant to et
the PI) n • r qu r d • to beco
ue ao r ya le, the City C U'l II he City a all fort lth
r.oalt 111 auch ~ fuod lnq • r dit nal fund a • ul r fully to
t..
" 11 t ....
" nr na In
·11-
,_
• •
,
-
(
•
•
•
•
On tis the !:1o1m~ oli..:CrUl!S Wlll} liUffl j( to ~~''
as au
lftl r lUI B , ilnd 0 f"Y ' ld uonJs t lh ir I ... c 1\."
't \Jl1 ' lCS.
5 on &. R.Jtcs an.!!_ C"'~<trcJ~"'S ~~v~ce b ~~
thP S !!!_Lld ry .... r s~~ f~m. The C1ty Council of the Clty
covenants that tt wtll rstabltsh, ~a~ntaJn dnd enforce rates
and charges for st •rvtccs r endered by the sani lary s wer
S)•stcm to cr ate incornQ and r venue o ach year suC f1.cient t.o
p~y the (ollowJnq:
a) The cos s and xp ns • of he o~rat1on
nd m .1n t..'n.lncc o! the santlary sewer system;
b) The dmount n Ps&ary to J•ay he prlnctpal
dnd lftl r~st of the 19&2 Bonds dnd the 1976 Bonds
•ch year; and
c) For the n•qutr d payr"i(;nts to the r<!serve
rund ~nd other funds P8lahlish ·d by the Ordlnance
uthor1z1nq he 1962 Bonds and by this Ordinance.
It ahall be the Juty of the Clly to establ1sh,
1nl 1n nd nfotce auch rat • contln oualy unttl all of
a 1d bond nd th 1n ,., t lh"r n have b n fully p•nd and
t •• Cl y will ... l<t ftl • lO 1na
~y ' • rovta ona of
ct on 1.
T Caty C m II ...
$1,0 2,
••
thaa Or 1n n
.
2.
_, .
0
r ra • an1 ch r9ea
h P•Y"' nta,
r<7ea lo auch
'"' uJ t tor~• r u 1 d
'
• •
-
(t
•
•
,. -
Pl.lllCl[ll of tnd intvC(1 St 10 :.ttd lnrls, 1he Ct y h<lS
cr,•.t tt ·d t S t 't.'C'l.'ll ,. d U 1 ntlld ' t!,~ "Rtf H.·-ltny J .... ·er
t.~2", wh1r l ~h1 ll contdin all vt the
i r. UrTIL 1nd rcvr n r 1vrd t:y q,,, C1ty from thl! iJ ·rat Jon of
Tt 0 Gr i r •nc·" i•rOvtdr.s l._u suc h
the ncc,•ssJry ond propPr c~~ts tnl cxren~cs o f he effictcnt
·Jnd , ,~on m1Cdll OJ cra t ton and mrtin •nc.1nce o f he sys em , for
the p..1ymant of t 1,c 1 r1nc1pal .Jnd 1ntcr s t on U1e l'lb2 a nds,
f o r payments o a tr a ·1ve f ni, lnd find lly for paym nlt; to
a Rrpa1r c.1nd Rl·p l ct.~ t S ~~r S) t m rund.
Th~ 1976 Honds hall h've d 1rs .tn d frlor lin
o n the nP tucc~ and ff..'-'dl l! o! •h a 1111 ary
o f h Ct.t y, on f"Clly \tdlh l'u.: OU'& 10d109 19b2 8 f1dS.
Accord1ng!y , lh •re shall
h~rc by crca ed 4nd d st ndt d dS ha "1~7 S wtr Rev nue
R fu nd1n9 Bond and ln er b f'unol", on orb fore the 15th day
of F bruary .~nd AUtJUSl .tc-h '1" 11r, an amount not 1t &a u, n he
n~xt 1nsta l l n of tnL rt:sl J.lt' on h outst r .. llnq
and in ~dd1tion on or b~fore th~ l~th dAy of Auqust
76 Bonds ,
ch y r
n amount no s ttun ~~ n x 111st llrntn cf prtnclpal of
Sllld Bonds. SJch d JlOiil s t1 11 b m.:tde conc..·urtently wt h
th r qUiJ'l'd J i)I!'IPnt S Of f r lnClOa l 0~ lOtfll( &t fOt J,e )
nds.
Th lftlluntli rrn:ht(;' to th• n nt ni Tnt r f'und
ah~ll b~ J J •o
h 1976
IHy
1 y 11"
' l l I
n a
n a ••
0
.)A.
r 1 in• r s n .. 11 of
•
bl .
an l roll( I n
>otl in
th r
lr
'
• •
,
]-
(C
•
•
0 , .
•
a t 1 as t sufflcicnL 1n t1me ~nd 1~ju,t to pay th addi 1onal
~1mounts of prlnctpal and in etc-st. Ar1y aub.Jrdinate lien
bonds hercetfter issued, shall be }Jtlyable f r om a separ~ e
fund or funds tnlo wh1ch d pos1t!» shall be l!ldde and subj c t
t o the dc p os1ts and !•dymPnt~ rL4Uircd or ptnmJt.tcd t.o be
m~de fo r t h e p<lyrnent of the 1962 f •nds, th 1976 Bonds , and
n y other out!=; anding partty ltc-n bonds.
After the payme n t of the c~s G and Ypenses of
the operat1on and maintcnJnce of the ~ant ary scwet system,
a nd t.he rC>qu1red paj!"''enls o f prin• 1pal of md 1.nl rest o n
he 19 62 Bonds and th 1976 B~nd , ~ut c~ nt1 w1th
th d post s r q-.ured, 1f any, to th 1ea ~rvf' (und c r &ted
as a dd ittonal ,..ur 1 y for t l'l uds, paym n s shall
pd r ttcularly aPt forth 1
At er he l y nta r qu11 aa lndtcated above,
nd revenue of the aanltdry sewer ayalcm m•y
b u a d for h paym nt of the prlnClp~l of and •n reat
o n bond a hav1ng a 11en wh1ch 1• uborl1nat to th IJen
nda and the 1976 B nda.
~ny rr 1n1ng 1nc
the depo 1t1 to • h R pur
nd rev ll may ht' u ed o r
Fund, •• r Ulr d by aa1d Oldin nc ~ 1, s~r ..
fo r •ny JJ1 tonal ex .. n&iona,
to th 1yate~. fe r
h• ou • n~in 19t2 Bond&
0 h r I wtul puqo<' o' Ci
SeC't1on 1.
Tt, r• ,.
"
th pur
rov •n•a •nd e •r.en t a
lng or p"rct. li 9 nt oC
• 1976 8 nda, or for ny
y.
. ' r
I'
;-
•.
• •
I .
•
•
0 , .
•
lnt.erest on lhe bonds du hortzt·d Oy th!s Ordtnance . The
Reserve Fund fihall Lc d C' mul n ~t~d 1n th• ot 11 :no u :1 t o[
$170,000 , by the d~posit annually o a h rund of an ~mount
nol less than $12,000, w1th an 1n1ttal d po< of $35,000.
ThP tnnual dl!f>OSlts -hall .. d on or b for• December 31
<·Jrh y.~ r, ~egtnntnq 1n tho y ar l97b. The RPserve Fund
shall be m;untainPd unttl such tim. ... th• amount there1n
wtll be sutf1cu·nt to pay all of thp o t.&t\ndlnq 1976 Bonds
arj the tnlercst hereon. The ~oncy ~n th Res rve Fund
may be used toP ' Vl:nt. defaults tn t!"l payment of the bonds
her~1n authortztJ 1nd JnLcz t th•reon, but t! us d for such
purpo•e, 1 shall be t stored o he fund as soon aa poastble.
Moneys 1n he Rt-serv rund may b tnv s cd tn dtrcct obllqa-
ions of the Un1ted States Government o~ 1n obltqa 1ona or
secur1t1ea of !'ly U.\lf>ncy or 1nstru111Hnlali y t h r of, and th
inter ~t fr ~ dny auch 1nv~s 11ts hall be con11d~re •
r v nu a of e 1 n1t ry ae ... •r I}' t m.
S•c 10n 9. C v nanta of th Ctt . Th C tty hereby
fur her 1 rr voc.tbly c·over nts •n-:1 Cti.JC. 1 Wl th c ch and every
hol r of h• 1976 Bonds "•u••J und r the provutona of thia
Ordtnance , that •o lon •• •~Y of ••1d Bonde re• in outs and1nq:
a) ""111 con tnye '0 o rate nd rn•11• • the
'" tpla
th t •h
fu In
at all
bl
C ity
nls
;at 10 n ef f ci nt •nd con H~al
•nd d•abura
s w ' v" nu
lm a 1,. ... ily
t •h
Bon1 tun
nd C:CJt
' -
ra e c o ta of the
01
I ly
In
nne r
the
·•nd 1'176, • y
ule
r•
nta
. .
• •
({
•
•
0
•
tnd ,,ccufntJ},Jt 1u:1, l•'lJ'llrcd by t 1.L• 11 VIol• l"i of this
f llltnJncf'.
C) l' • 1 1 I I C'l 11 Ot •L JtC ,,,~. of t 11C.'
1 TOI lty c n.tl'Ultn~ fl)' 1 or t 0 1 .til : 'h" • .1. t 1ry
• • .,r sy m tn H.y m ~ r or to .my Xll!nL s l(jht
r,..h.1C'e the ~.C>c-urtty l(.. .. lJ d f Ll[ he •ym n of •I.e
I nls ,t.J ' 'tOCllPd twrE>in, lout the Clly rr'oJ S(?)) any
f .O I t l 10 of b<JCh trOpl'rty wh1ch shoJ I huve b on n:pl 1 ~ed
l>y o h r m.dar tHJPI'l. y uf at lt•tll cqu value, o r
wh1 c h -=.ha ll "L tse to be n,•Ct.S!hlcy for the flificl.ent
OJ)(·tatl"ln lf !!>,llJ c:}'8 tt·; JJIOVlJ•J, ho ... .._vfr, thdt tn
h v nt •H 11"J' 1le or ~.Jl s , L fon sat , \oohtre
lh .11g reg:n CO!l 1 tdt1on xc rJs the sua of $1,000 ,
Ul"h 1.. IIISldl•tat.~-on Sh 11 he p11d IUlO •h R fU:lJtng
s~w er Rev nue B nd Fund a t ~b n d 76 , or .n c he
•.hscr~ Jon of P, C1ty, t:,d hctll b used !ot the
puq.Jo es a( he fund 1nto ~owh1ch 1t is d pointed.
d) At rt•q ular r riods Pa h ~'lr , ,t .,..111 te.nder
btlll foe h.1nit.(t1y S • •r bf lVlCf S fll Z1iah r! th
l'f dr on nJ •
I' lj, 11 .J:1ll ry
tute • ]I non
I • \lih ,.
'' r
n 1ee enl \ 11
an d ltl • rv
w l r
n! t •
"r b1lls • all
rt o f ""· • r htll• rl'!n reL Vn t 11
""
I'
on is
l d t JJ n
·1 •
ly IO ..
•u h
•.
'
• •
]-
•
•
I •
•
sanitary sewer .;;ystl•m fu[' th(l' fi sC -ll year irr.rflediately
receding such tal~ •t nt.
f) wtll c4 rry wQrl<.mt:n's c pens 1on, public
l1a 1l1t ~ and o her f a una of t n~uranc e c;.n l i"SUt bl e
san 1tary e wer by&·e~ fr ter~y s ~ould ordtn r1ly be
ca rrted b y uttlit1es h~v1n9 sirn1 ldr proper ies of e qual
v lu~, such insurance Lfin~ in such a unls as wi ll
protect he sysl~m dO d il& oprr ,tton.
g) It w1l l furnt&h no fl t~ sanita r y sewer service
and, if it lects t o use ~ewer s 1V1ces !or munLc i pal
purposes, 1t wtll m Ke p r o v i sion to p y therefor at the
same rate a a 1s charged o h rs fo r like o r sim1lar serv1ce.
h) For the prot~ctlo n of the hea lth o f the inhabi-
tants of the Ctty, tt Wlll , by 'p proprillt~ a c tion, compe l
all the o wn e rs of occupied proper ies capable o f ei nq
aerved by the san1tary sewer sya t e~, to conn~ct their
premis s w1th such ays ~m.
S cllon 10. .t.ddltional !oOnds, Re u!..!:_.m~s and
~~1tat1o~. No addi ton•l t~nds s al l ba issued payabl e
{rom th tnc and re\. nu of he aan1tary s 'W'f'r syst 11 and
ha ving a l1en u n auch 1ncom and rvv n • wh Jch ia aup•r1or
to the l1en o ! the Bonds r the 1976 Bonds.
H • v r , 'h1n n a1n d In this Ord1nance shal l
ba consuu d nn r a• orr vent •he iasu•nce by
e net inc-and
rev nue 10 n o f th e a ni ary • ~•r
s y at m nd cooa~1 u •in • ll n upcn aid r venu • •qual o
or on a p r1 y ~l lh .e II no ! he 19 8 n or ~ 1976
Bond•, • I ng aa • . , t •
of all
in
,._
•.
• •
•
•
I• -
S 'W•'lr Pt!vl'nue Bond RC! CJV Fund of 19&2, the
S •w• r Jl• Vt. nue ,..._! -n 1J .-.J 8 nJ Re cr•Jt:o l"Lnd, l 76,
.d t
au hor
cc-qu1r r~t.• f
Bonds, 1•1
for prlnClpal and
be ruved.
1! allot
Sys• m Fu:1d,
r 1 6 9b2.
he sani ar1
f 13Cttl )·("·ar
Dl X m annua l
n all out-
annual
he 197
nte
to
~da la · b P ~a1d
and •• no lon r o tat ndin~. h n ddl·
th n 1ncc
of th tt ry w r ay t • n'1 h•v ng a liPn on such
net in OMC aod rev nu on a f~' ty wJth th 1~7 Ronda
and tny 0 h r 0Utst4n,Jlnq p Ill)' li~n bond ay b ... d prDVl t d:
(!) tha tt. Cr y Ia rr n In he p yro nt
ot all prlnc 1•1 nd In r a t of hf' 1976 Borde
all o•h [ por y .. t n • lCh
s• a di v an 1& c-urL nt in
• c roula n of .. II I nd•
ty 197
n nee whl h u horlz ny out•
• ndlnq 1 rt•y ll<!n 1 u
(rll le
-1
•.
• •
,
-
((
•
•
All
a ncS
•
•
me n ts of the 1 97 6 Bonds , any add~tion3l oulsl~n d in g
pa rity l ien bond s, and lh proposed par t ty ll.e n
bonds to be issued.
I f rates and c h arges for san1tary sew r serv1ce
h a ve b e e n i nc r eased durt ng t he preced1ng f isca l yed r,
t hen the n et i n come and revPnlle Cdn be determ1ned by
apply t nq the ne w r a es and charges to he q antt 1ea
of s er v ~co a c tual l y furntshed duri ng such yea r.
No t hing h ere1n shal l p tev en t the C1 t y from lsliuing
a dd1t 1onal bonds hdvlng • JUOJO c or subo r d1n~t~ l ien
on th net int '"" and revcnu o f t.he san 1 t.ary sew r
• and accumulation•
r equtred o be ~d• y t 1a Ord1nanc• •re cotrPn l .
t.l o n 11.
coa t.a a nd e •pe • •
P•Y -• o f l •
10 urred in
Bond '!_.
t he 1aauance
, re1n, shtll be p •id
""cl u uvel y rr nda o r from the net
even t s h d l a ny of
o f o r 1nt r a t
"'" r.l f nda
Clly
all • ll
o •t1aOrch•
k tl u .
DlrPetor o{ F n n
n Ci y at ll, ancS t
., all
a I'
po ita
r. r w Ar • y
nd 1n no
fC l nc lpal
ar ·d to lha
of tha
cS 0 u
OVIIi na
ncS •
•••n•• of
d • • d to
ery
•.
• •
,
1-
•
•
•
•
or de sir ~ble to ffectuate th~ prOV!blOns of this Ordi nance
a nd comp ly w1th Lhe r eq u irements of law.
Sec tio n 14. ~t2_~n of N<?.!.._l c
on or ubou t the date when the Sewer ~cvenu
<.!.!_ Fefundin •
RP.fund1nq Bond s
are d l1vered, or wilhln a rea &onab ly t1me th~ r ca fter, he
Director of F1nance 1s autho r 1~ed ~nd dir c ed o publ1sh
a Not t ee of Re fund J..ng onP t 1ne in a ne .... ·spuper publ1sh~d in
the C1ty .
S ct ion 15. 1-.rbt r~e . Th Ct ty cove nants and
agtees t hat 1t w1ll not make ,,r f 'rrmit any use o f the proceeds
of the ScwPr Revenu Re funlh ng Bonds u hertz d ht,.rein whtch
if such use h d been reason .tbly expected on he date of
issuunce of t.he Pefundtng B~ud::. .... auld hctv ~ (,;aust-"d such
o bliqat1 ons o be arbitrage nds Within h em aning of
Section 103 (d) of the ln ernal Revenue Cod e o f 195 4, as
a~cnded, and th Regulattona her e '" efft c at l h
time of suc h use and applicable to the obltq ttons tssued
on th e d te of 1aauanc of the Pefund ln nda.
Section 16.
Tha l 1f any on or ~r.or(lo St"C:tlons o r par t.s of thls O.rdln.lnce
•hall be adJUdJ d u" •nforc ble or 1nvahd, •u,·h JU d<Jn..,nt
•hall not aft c t, l •p 1r or 1nval1da te th 1nlnq prova-
a Jona of hta Ord 1nance, •t i n t h tnt«·ntton t.ha he
V r1 0U8 prOV JI1008 t C Of •r I V1UAbl
All ord1n n s or
h.LI
lua d, hi
until •••d bon •
t lly u , • Ia
ore I • f .. , • 7
rta
L
, 1!,
7 •
in confl cl with
nda re
n
• •
1--
•
(
•
•
0
•
Section 17. Pu~11catf.£!! and Effect he Oa t@. This ordinance,
after 1ts final passage, shall ~ rurbered and r@Corded, and thP adop tion
and pub licat ion sha ll b~ aut •n 'cated by ~e s .qnature of •he ~layer and
the Olr@ctor of Finance, ex-offfcic City C'erl, and hy the CP r tiffcate of
Publfcatlon. Thfs nrdfnance shall ~ecooe eff@Ctlve thirty (30) days after
rublfcatfon followfnq final passaqe .
Introduced, read In ~ull an( passed on f1rst readfnq on the
17th day of February, 19n.
Pu blished as a Pfll tor an nrdfnance on the 18 h day of
February, 1976 .
Read by tl le and passed on final rea d •n g on ~e 1st day of
March, 197 6.
Publis hed by ti leas Ord1nance llo ~. rfes of 1Q76, on
the __ day of 'larch, 197f.
Anrs ·
rromtro m
...
•.
• •
((
•
\
•
•
0 , .
•
INI'RODUC ED AS A BILL BY COONCIIMAN BROWN
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. ~. SERIES OF 1976
AN ORDINANCE REZONIOO A CERI'AIN PARCEL OF lAND WI'IHIN '!HE CITY
OF Emr..&IOOD, ARAPAHOE OOUNIY, STATE OF COI.ORAOO, FRav1 R-1-C SII\\JI.E-
FAMILY RESIDENCE DIS'IRICT, 'ID R--2 MEDI UM DENSITY RESIDENC E DISTRICT,
AND AMENDII\\J '!HE OFFICIAL zor..m.n JIIAP ACCORDII\\JLY.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 22.3 of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, a Public Hearing was held before the City Planning and
Zoning Carrnission on January 20, 1976 to rezone a certain parcel
of land within the city fran R-1-C Single-Family Residence District
to R-2 Medium ~nsity Residence District; and
WHEREAS, said Planning and Zoning Coomission has considered
the proposed arrendment and map change and has sutmitted its favor-
able reccrrrneooation to the City Council therefor; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 22. 3 of the Carprehensi ve Zoning
Ordinance a Public H aring s held before City Council on March lst,
1976 to rezone said pare 1 according to t above desi!?J1B.tion; and
WHffi.EAS , public nece 1ty , conv n1 nee , heal h, safety, the
general lfare and good zoning prac ic justify the proposed
arrendmen to the said Official Zon1 p , as inaft r set
forth.
~, 'lliEREI<'ORr:, IT HY 'mE CITY II, 0 THE CITY
OF ENGIEWCX)[), OOLORAOO, AS
Section 1.
'
• •
1--
(\
•
•
0 -
on the east line of the ~ ~ said Section 8;
thence north along said east line 503.14 feet
+/-to point of beg:inning·
Section 2.
'Ihe Official Zoning Map of the City of &lglewood, Colorado, hereby
is amerrled accordingly.
Introduced, read in fUll and passed on first reading on the 200
day of FebruarY, 1976. ~
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the tth day of February,
1976. ~
Read by title an:\ passed on final reading on the 1st day of March,
1976.
Published by title as Ordinance No. _, Series of 1976, on the
_2_ day of March, 1976.
ATlliST:
MAYOR
a v arrl fo 1ng is
c passed on final reading
rles of 1976.
. <Jo'FICIO Cl'l'Y CiJ'lU<-'l'HEASIJ R
-2 -
'
• •
,
...... •
CITY PLANNING AND ZONI G COMMISSION
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, CO LORADO
IN THE MATTER OF CASE NO. 3-76, )
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, )
AND RE COMMENDATIONS RELATING TO )
THE PLACING OF CERTAIN AREAS OF )
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD IN AN R-2 )
ZONE DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO )
§22.3-2 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE )
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF )
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. )
A public h'aring was helu £n conn~ction with Case No . 3-76 ,
on January 20, 1976 , in th Coun i l Chamb rs at the Englewood
C1ty Hall. The following m mb rs of th Co mmi ssion were present :
Mr. Brown, r. Jon , Mr. Jorgen on, Mr. Smith, Mr. Tanguma,
Irs. Wade and lr. Williams.
The following member of th Commi ion w re ab ent: Mr. Parker
and Mrs. Pierson.
pr
th
~on in
a
t
FJ DI GS OF FACT
tak n in th f orm of testi~ny,
docua nt , th co .. is ion aak •
to consid r th propo d
hin
zon d R-1-C, Sin
d b Ordinanc
ily
'
(
•
•
-~-
That the land to the north and east of the area with which
thi application is concerned, is zoned I-1, Light Industrial;
the land to the south is zoned R-1-C, Sing le-family Residence,
and to the west, the land is zoned R-1-8, Single-family Residence.
That the land included in the application, exc luding the
public rights-o f -way, is approximately 4.3 acres and is divided
into two parcels, One parcel of approximately 1,889 acres is
owned by Mr. and Mrs. B. L. Weaver, and the remaining land is
owned by Mrs. Maye Ferguson.
That the land which is the subject of this application has
not been platted and that before development takes place, it
will have to be subdivided in accordance with the Subdivision
Regulations, Title XII, Chapter 3, of the '69 E.M.C., as amended.
That there is one single-family house on each of the two
parcels, occupied by the r espec tive owners.
That both proper ie hav been on the market and the
owners of both p reel hav been told by real state agents
that th y coul<' ·1ot sell th 1-.nd a it is pre ntly zoned.
That th ar i bound d on th north by W t Union Av nue,
on th a t by 16 foot righ t -of-way, which would b an extension
of South Clay Str t which for th d pth of th property
or 473.14 f t, and on th by South catur Str t. There
i no public ace to th ct pro rty from th outh.
a
1
Th 1
nort of
t ' -3' 11 h
ot 1 75 .
t
ntit
a ainiaua
50 f t.
rat • a r
•
1-
(
(
•
•
0
•
flexible zone classification to be imposed on land situated,
as the subject property is, between industrial zoning on the
north and east, and single-family residence zoning to the
south and west, thus serving as a "buffer"* between the unlike
zones.
That the Generalized Land Use Map in the Comprehensive
Plan, projects the development of this land at a medium density.
That on two previous occasions, the Planning Commission
has recommended to the City Council that the R-1-C, Single-family
Residence zoning was not proper as applied to the subject property.
That the R-2. Medium Density, will conserve and stabilize
the value of property, secure safety from fire and other danger,
prevent undue concentration of population, llld will promote the
health, sa fety, morals and the general welfare of the public
in accordance with a comprehensive plan .
CONCLUSIONS
That proper public notice of th e public hearing was given
by both posting the property and publishing in the official
City N wspaper.
That the present zoning is R-1-C, Sin l e-f amily R sidence,
and that in two previous instances, th City Planning and Zoning
Co is ion ha determined that as applied to this property,
that zon clas ification is not prop r.
That th property which i th ubJect of th:ls application
is bound d on th north and a t by land which 1 zon d for
in trial u , wh i ch indu trial zonin i not compa ibl
1 th nor conduciv to ingl -family r sid n d velop111 nt.
1
nd
to b a
ty 0
trip or
land u
d to
•.
'
• •
(
(
•
0 •• •
-4-
That the zone classification of R-2, Medium-Density
Residence, will continue to conserve and stabilize the value
of property, secur e safety f rom fire and other danger, prevent
undue concentration of population and traffic and to promote
the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the
public in accordance with a comprehensive plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Therefore, it is t b e recommendation of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission of the City of Englewood, Colorado, to
the City Council of the City of Englewood, that the above
described property to be zoned R-2, Medium Density Residence,
the zone classification adopted by Ordinance No. 30, Series
of 1975.
Upon vote at a meeting of the Commission on Janu ary 20,
1976 .
Those m mll r of the Plauniqr C•Jm mis ion voting in favor:
Mr . Brown, Mr. Jones, Mr. Jorgenson, Mr. Smith, Mr. Tan uma,
Mr • Wade and Mr. Williams .
Tho e m mbers of the Planning Commi ion voting against
th mot ion: None.
Tboee m mb r of th Plann ing Commi sion who w r abs nt :
Mr . Park r and Mr . Pier on.
BY ORDER 0 THE CITY PLA I G
A D ZO 1 G CO ISSIO
Jr.
•.
• •
1
2
3a-d
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
•
APPLICANTS' EXHIBITS
Case No. 3-76
Application for Rezoning
Map of Area
Certificates of Posting
Outline of History of Zoning
Staff Report on Case No . 15-75
Minutes of Commission Meeting of May 13, 1975
Staff Report on Case No. 19-75
Minutes of Commission Meeting of June 17, 1975
Recommendation of Commission on Case No. 19-75
Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1975
11 Acting Planning Directors' Memorandum of October 2, 1975
12 Staff Report on Case No. 3-76
13 Analysis of "Spot Zoning" Principles
14 Recommendation of Planning Commission on Present
Application
..
• •
•
•
( t.\.>··
APPLICATION FOR REZONING
City of Ensiewoodt Colorado
Date: November 7, 1975
APPLICANT:
Name:B. L. and \'lannita R. \'1eaver
Address:2714 West Union, Englewood
Telephone: 798-6777
Relation to
request: Property OWners
OWNER:
Name: See attached memorandum
Address: ____________________________ __
Telephone: __________________________ __
(For City Use Only)
(Hearing Number )
Statement of prior contact
with City Planning Depart-
ment:
Submitted herewith ia a depo3it of $50.00 for the first 10 acrea or
any portion thereof, plue $5.00 for each additional 5 acres or any
portion thereof, ae determined by the Plannina and Zoning Commission.
It is understood that thia depoait ia neceeaary to defray the ad-
ministrative coata entailed by thia requeat and, therefore, will not
be returned, and that additional f ... D&y be required to cover •. the
costs of advertiaing, if neceaaary. Tbe undereianed certifies that
he baa received and read a atateaent of current City policiea and ·
applicable excerpt• from City ordinaacea concernins rezoning.
APPLICANT ODD ------------7(nu~u~a~t~b~e~.~~~g~n~e~a by p~e~r~a~o~n~p~a~y~lr.n~g=-a~e~p~o~a~l~t~)r-------
COMJION DESCRIPTION OF ~.ARCEL TO BB RDOlRD:
See Attachment
LECAL DESCIIPTIOJ 01 PXitlt 1'0 D kdbHID:
See Attacbment
P.RESENT ZOMIKG:_R_-1_-_c _______ ll.IQUISTZD ZOllll'fG :_R_-_2 _____ _
R.USONS FOR REQUUTED CHANGE:
S Attachment
·.
(A t h dd1t onal he i:t necu a.ry)
•
• •
•
•
•
• ,'t
I
•
(~
• I() . ,
ATT~.CID-IENT TO RE-ZONING APPLICATION
OF B. L. AND ~vANNITA ~·7EAVER
Otvners of Property:
There are b10 parcels involved. The owners of which are:
1. The easterly parcel (the "\~eaver" property):
B. L. and l-lannita R. rleaver
2714 West Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
2. The \o~esterly parcel (the "Ferguson" property) :
Maye M. Ferguson
27 40 liest Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
B. L. and rlannita R. Weaver are the applicants and both otmers
are represented by, and may be contacted through:
John A. Criswell
Criswell, ?atterson and Ballantine
3780 South Broadway
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Telephone: 761-0800
Common Description of the Property to be Re-Zoned:
The area requested to be re-zoned consists of two parcels,
containing approximately ~ acres, bounded on the north by \·lest
Union Avenue, on the West South Decatur Street, approximately
Clay Street on the east, d about west Layton Avenue on the south .
(See map attached hereto.) ,g
Legal Description of Parcel to be Re-Zoned:
Beginning at the intersection of the east line of the W 1/2
E 1/2 of Section 8, TSS, R68W of the 6th P.H. and the centerline
of the \vest Union Avenue right-of -way; thence west along said
centerline a distance of 435 feet more or less to its point of
intersection with the centerline of South Decatur Street; thence
~outherly aiong the centerline of South Decatur Stre t a dist nc
of 506 fee t more or l ess to a point on said centerline which
would intersect with the south line of the parcel pres ntly otmed
by Haye Ferguson , if s id south line were extended; thence easter-
ly along the south lines of the parcel owned by Maye Ferguson
and the parcel owned by B. L. and nanni ta Weaver to the as t rly
right-of-way lin of that portion of South Cl y Street which is
pre ntly dedic ted a distance of 501.4 fe t mor or l as; th nee
nor h rly along 'the s id terly right-of-way lin a distanc
of 503.14 f t more or less to th point of b inning.
r sons or th r q est ch ng •
Th i~ prop rty w s nn x d o th C ty in l 61, which
•
•
\
( .~ ....
the ordinance provided that newly annexed territory \olould "auto-
matically" be zoned R-1-A--a provision ,.,.hich, under the present
annexation statute, would be illegal.
\•/hen the 1963 Comprehensive Ordinance was adopted, the pro-
perty owners could not agree upon which zone district in which
this area should be placed. Consequently, it \-Tas zoned R-1-C.
That zoning ,.,.as, \ole submit, a "mistake" and constituted improper
zoning at the time. Indeed, there is good reason to believe that
the City at that time imposed the R-1-c classification as merely
an interim or stop-gap measure, intending to reassess the problems
at a future date.
Presently, this ground borders industrially zoned ground on
its east and north. Immediately to i ·ts south is ground zoned
R-1-C. However, portions of this R-1-C ground to the south is
devoted to industrial, commercial or agricultural uses by virtue
of the prior non-conforming use provisions of the zoning ordinance.
To the west is a developed R-1-B area.
In addition, in 1971, an area across \·l est Union Avenue to
the west of Centennial Park was zoned R-3-A for apartment house
uses. This area contains 2.3 acres and is presently undeveloped.
On at least two previous occasions, the Englewood Planning
Commission has recommended a change in the zoning of this ground.
First, in 1961 the Commission recommended that this ground
be zoned for light industrial uses comparable to the present
zoning applicable to the property bordering the subject property
on its east. However, City Council tabled the Commission's
recommendation and never acted upon it.
On t-larch 25, 1975, one Carl T. \'Iiebe filed an application
to have a certain area, including the subject property , re-zoned
to R-2-B. However, on May 13, 1975, the Planning Co~ission re-
fused to act upon this application because no person having a
legal interest in the property had, at that time, joined in that
application.
On May 14, 1975, the present applicants joined with Mr.
\Hebe and filed a new requrest for R-2-B. On June 17, 1975, a
public hearing was held on this application and, on July 22,
1975, the Planning Commission favorably recommended to City Coun-
cil that the ground b re-zoned to the R-2-B classification.
Before Council could consider this request, how v r, the
zoning ordinance was amended to repeal the R-2-B classification
and to repl ce it with th pres nt R-2 classification. Upon ad-
vic of th City Attorney, Council took no action upon the Coamis-
sion's recommend tion nd th pplicants were advis d th t n w
application would b n c ssary.
Th subject prop
to b platted b fore
rin
die
nt could tak plac •
required
highly
on this
i impo ibl
Th
principl s \IOUld norm lly
b "buf r d" !ro. n
1-
\
(_
.,
•
indu s trial or commercial district. There is no buffer zone be-
tween the subject property and the industrially-zoned property
to the east. By granting this request, this property would, it-
self create a proper buffer of medium density residences between
that industrial land and the single-family, R-1-B, residences to
the \vest.
•l
•.
• •
,
• ,_
. .. • .
~ ... ~
.... • • _._;,; ..
' ) ? ~ .,. .. ~ .,
( ( I..._./ .. . ·o 0
""
,.., c
"'
..
.) "
·~~'
,.., .:>
0 (]> If)
'+ (]> ~~ " -:-0
~ i (
,..,
"':. "' \[; "' -~
I ' tf I q
~ oo J. :zl
N ~ CD
.-----~x--u ,..0 0 • "' t ( t CDK "'• ( 0 0 j ,..,
"'
PN .... [~,
,-; ....... b rrj
IJ (~I_... I(" ~
:;,-"'" "' ~
;·Q .J
;:} (} CD 0
Cl) (]>
0 ~ ~ g "'" ~
?
0 0d ,/
.... ·t
~ N ... Q . ., ,., . ~ Ar
"'
~ ,._
~ . "' !i 0 8 .J .,
... ...
';:)(( s .
"'
.,.. .
I§
-~. ...
0 Q Q _I •--' 1&1 -· ti 0 "' . ~ ; 8
,., . r A
0 • "'
..
~ ~ '
0 ~ \ ;;:. . or "
"' .,
"
"' ('
-l
iii
"' ) /1 .
l z 0 'O ,_ _ . ...,
• j 3 I [] n • I
H\J\.•A3 ru.v.&.•"-
• •
,
t ~:
•
•
. ..
southeast corner
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Attached is a photograph of a sign as it is erected on the following
described property: __ ;S~e~e~a~t~t~a~c~hm~e~n~t~-------------------------------------
Legal Description
I hereby certify under oath that the above described property was posted
continuously for a period of 15 days, from February 14
----------· 1976 to March 1 ' ----~~~----------------------------
Stat o Co lorado )
) 88
County of Arapahoe )
Date
1976
Sub cri b d and sworn to before e this 2 6th day of r_e_b_r_u_a_ry-=------------'
19...;,7..;..__
y c 1aaion xp1r a:
'
• •
,
•
•
ATTACHMENT TO CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Legal description:
Beginning at the intersection of the east line of
theW 1/2, E 1/2 of Section 8, T 55, R 68 W, of the 6th P.M.
and the centerline of West Union Avenue R.O.W.; thence west
along said centerline 435 ft. +/-to the centerline of South
Decatur Street; thence southwesterly along said centerline
506 ft. +/-; thence east 501.4 ft. +/-to a point on the
east line of the W 1/2 E 1/2 said Section 8; thence north
along said east line 503.14 ft. +/-to point of beginning.
• •
• -
Northwest corner
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Attached is a photograph of a sign as it is erected on the following
described property: See attachment ~~~~~~~-----------------------------..
Legal Description
I hereby certify under oath that the above described property was posted
continuously for a period of 15 days, from February 14
1976 to March 1 ----~~~----------------------------1976
Februar 26, 1976
Date
State of Colorado )
) IS
County of Ar apah )
ub cribed and worn to be or m this 26th day of February
19 7
: y c iss1on xpir a:
• •
•
-•
0
•
ATTAC~~NT TO CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Legal description:
Beginning at the intersection of the east line of
the \i 1/2, E 1/2 of Section 8, T 55, R 68 W, of the 6th P.H.
and the centerline of \iest Union Avenue R.O.W.; thence \-Test
along said centerline 435 ft. +/-to the centerline of South
Decatur Street; thence southwesterly along said centerline
506 ft. +/-; thence east 501.4 ft. +/-to a point on the
east line of the \i 1/2 E 1/2 said Section 8: thence north
along said east line 503.14 ft. +/-to point of beginning.
• •
]-
•
•
•
0
(
Southwest corner
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Attached is a photograph of a sign as it is erected on the following
described property :_.=S.=e.::e:.....::a:..:t:..:t.::a:.::c.;.:hrn=e::.:n:..:t:...._ _________________ _
Legal Description
I hereby certify under oath that the above described property was posted
continuously for a period of -~1~5 _____ days, from February 14
1976
Stat of olorado
County of Arapah
to ---~M~a~r~c~h~1;__ ________ ------
) ..
)
F bruary 26, 197
oat
ub rib d and sworn to or
1 7
•y c iaa on xpir a: July 24, 1978.
19~.
r
• •
-
•
•
0
•
(
ATTACHMENT TO CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Legal description:
Beginning at the intersection of the east line of
the \'1 1/2, E 1/2 of Section 8, T 5S, R 68 l-1, of the 6th P.H.
and the centerline of West Union Avenue R.O.W.; thence west
along said centerline 435 ft. +/-to the centerline of South
Decatur Street; thence southwesterly along said centerline
506 ft. +/-; thence east 501.4 ft. +/-to a point on the
east line of the W l/2 E 1/2 said Section 8; thence north
along said east line 503.14 ft. +/-to point of beginning.
'
•
.. t ~:o: ..
•
Northea st corner
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Attached is a photograph of a sign as it is erected on the following
described property : __ ~s~e~e~a~t~t~a~c~hm~e~n~t~-------------------------------------
Legal Description
I hereby certify under oath that the above described property was posted
continuously for a period of 15 days, from February 14
----------' 1976 , to ----~M~a~r~c~h~1~-------------------------• 1976
:/
February 26, 1976
State of Colorado )
) 88
Cou nty of Arapahoe )
Date
ub cribed and sworn to before me this 26th
19 76
My commi a on xpir e: July 2 4,
pr
day of F bruary
nted partm nt
ign.
nt prior
d in th
th
•
1-
•
•
•
0 I•
•
(
ATTACHMENT TO CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
Legal description:
Beginning at the intersection of the east line of
the H 1/2, E 1/2 of Section 8, T 5S, R 68 t'l, of the 6th P .!-1.
and the centerline of West Union Avenue R.O.W.; thence west
along said centerline 435 ft. +/-to the centerline of South
Decatur Street; thence southwesterly along said centerline
506 ft. +/-; thence east 501.4 ft. +/-to a point on the
east line of the \i 1/2 E 1/2 said Section 8; thence north
along said east line 503.14 ft. +/-to point of beginning •
'
• •
-
•
•
(
OUTLinE OF HISTORY OF ZONING
In order to place the present re-zoning request in proper
p e rspective , a short "history" of the subject property's zoning
may b e appropriate. This "history" discloses the following:
1961 This area was annexed to the City. At that time, all
n ew ly---anfiexed ground \vas "automatically" zoned R-1-A, \-Tithout
h earing , notice or Conmission consideration.
1961 A request to re-zone t.."le property from R-1-A to H-1
(light industrial) 'vas approved by the Planning Co=ission, but
tabled indefinitely by Council.
1963 This property was re-zoned from R-1-A to R-1-C, the
1m-rest single family residential zone.
1963-1974 Several informal inquiries were made respecting
the re-zoning of the ground, but no official request for re-zoning,
nor official City action, was taken.
1974 (Case No. 13-74) A Staff Report was submitted to the
Commission, following an informal meeting '·rith the land owners,
but no official Comgission action was taken.
~1arch-May, 1975 (Case No. 15-75) A formal application for
re-zoning to R 2-B "'as filed and a formal hearing before the
Commission was held, but the application was dismissed \-Then it
was discovered that the applicant had no interest in the proper-
ty involved. This application related to all of the property
between Union and the Littleton business-industrial zoned ground
to the south.
-' Uay-June, 1975 (Case No. 19-75) A new application uas filed
by the owners of certain portions of the area involved in Case
No. 15-75 for the same area and, after public hearing, this
Commission, with only one dissenting vote, recommended that the
area be re-zoned to R-2-B.
August, 1975 Council adopted Ordinance No. 30, Series of
1975, which repealed the R-2-B classification and which rendered
it legally impossible for City Council to take action upon the
Commission's recommendation in Case No. 19-75.
November, 1975 (C ase No. 3-76) A request for re-zoning to
R-2 (the district which, under Ordinance No. 30, replaced the pre-
vious R-2-B) was filed, but the application was limited to the
northern portion of the re involved in Case No. 19-75. on
January 20, 1976, the Planning Commission, after a pualic he ring,
and upon a unanimous vote of thos members present, reco~endcd
to this City Council that the land e r -zon d to include it with-
in the R-2, H dium D nsity R sid nee, District.
0
• •
-
' l . • I
,.
.~
(
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -1-
(
f
Staff Report Re:
•
0
•
REZONING REQUEST
Case #15-75
The rezoning of approximately 14 acres from R-1-C,
Single-family Residence Di strict to R-2-B, Two-fam i ly Residence
District.
Date to be Considered:
May 13, 1975
' Name and Address of Applicant:
Carl T. Wiebe
4488 South Federal Boulevard
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Names and Addresses of Property Owners:
The County Assessor's records show the following as
owners of the properties in the area requested for r e zoning :
Blanford and Agnes Duckett
2727 West Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Henry L. Feistner
11012 White Mountain Road
Sun City, Arizona 85351
Maye M. Ferguson
2740 West Un i on Avenue
Englewood, Co l orado 801 10
Elle n Gree n
2 7 24 We t Un i on Avenue
.E n glewood, Color a d o 80110
Wayne w. and Emaa • Parr
2800 We t Ch nango Avenu
Engl wood, Colorado 80110
J. C. Wrtle . Tidw 11
2720 \Ve t Union Av nu
Engl wood, Colorado 80110
John D. Ch rlotte K. Tid ell
2722 W t Un i on Av nu
ngl wood, Colorado 80110
B. L. nd \ nni tta R. w v r
2714 W t Un on Av nue
o o , Colorado 80110
• •
'
-
c
(
~
I
•
(
STAFF REPORT f
Page -2-
•
0 -
Relation of Applicant to Re ques t:
REZONING REQUEST
Ca s e #15-75
Mr. Carl T. Wiebe is the applicant for the r e zoning
and is also the intended purchaser of the prope rtie s o wned by
Mrs. Ferguson, Nr. and Mrs. We a ver and Mr. Feistner.
Location or Address of Proposal:
The area requested for rezoning is located in south-
west Englewood, south of Centennial Park. The subject area
' is bounded on the west by South Decatur Street, on the north
by West Union Avenue, on the east by what would be South Clay
Street extended, and on the south by the Englewood/Littleton
City Limits. (See Vicinity Map. )
Zone District:
R-1-C, Single-family Residence.
Description of Request:
The intended purchaser of the property, Mr. Carl T.
Wiebe, plans to construct a series of luxury double units
upon the frontal parcels pres.ntly owned by Mr. Feistner,
Mrs. Ferguson, and Mr. and Mrs. Weaver. (See Area Map}
With industrial zoning to the north, east and south,
Mr. Wiebe f eels that development of these properties cannot
take place under the present R-1-C Zoning; hence, the request
f o r the R-2-8, Two-family residence zoning. Mr. Wiebe feels
t ha t " •.• rezon i ng this to R-2-8 would create an ideal buffer
zone betwe n ex i sti n g si n g le-f amily and i ndustrial zoning.
Th i s also would be cont iguou and comp l imentary to the park
acros Un i on Avenue."
Recommendat i on f rom the D pa r t me nt o f Commun i ty Deve l opment :
Th staff recomm nds that th e P lann i n g and Zoning
C o ~i sion approv e the reque t for t h e rezon i n g from R-1-C ,
Singl -t mily Resi d ence Di trict, to R-2-8, ~o-!a m ily Re i d ence
District, under th authority gra n t d to the Commi sion by
§22.3-2 of th City of Engl wood Compreh neiv Zoning Ordinance .
Thi rocomm ndatio n i ba d on th iodin s that:
l . Th R-1-C Single-mily Re id nc zoning may not hav
b n the corr ct initial zon ing for thi ar a.
2.
3.
rti within th ubj ct area ar n o t
tically d v elopabl und r the R-1-C Zo ne Dietr ict ,
of it proximity to indu trially zon e d ar
d for r zonin 1
nd th r tor
t bli h d by th ty.
"on (1)
1tb
• •
'
-
~
I
(
(
•
• ...
-
{
STAFF REPORT
Page -3-
REZONING REQUEST
Case #15-75
4. The proposed medium-density zoning would not be in
conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The maximum possible density permitted in the R-2-B
Zone District could be accommodated by those facilities
most directly affected, such as utilities and police
and fire services.
6. There are commercial, educational and recreational
facilities within the immediate area that could meet
those needs of the additional population that may come
about because of the rezoning.
Description of Subject Site or Area and the Adjacent Area:
Tbe area surrounding the subject site has a mixture
of uses. To the west is the Centennial Acres Subdivision
which is zoned R-1-B, Single-family Residence, and completely
developed. Centennial Park, with 3.45 acres developed and
37.55 acres undeveloped, is to the north across West Union
Avenue. Adjacent to Centennial Park on the west is an un-
developed 2.3 acre site zoned R-3-A, Multi-family Residence.
This site was zoned by Ordinance No. 24 of 1971.
The area to the east of the subject site is zoned for
light industrial development. There have been no new industrial
buildings constructed in this adjacent area; however, the uses
are those permitted in the industrial district. Further to
the east and most particularly along West Union Avenue, there
has been considerable activity of an industrial nature.
There are five single-family re idence in this l-1
area south of We t Union Avenue. A trailer storage lot,
which is in th City of Littleton, adjoins the subject area
on the south.
Acce s to the area is by tay of South Decatur Street
which delimits the area on the we t, and We t Union Avenue,
which delimits the area on th north. West Union Avenue has
b en designat d a collector tre t in the Ua ter Street
Plan. Along th a t boundary of th W av r property i a
16 t. right-of-way which provide liDit d ace to propertie
to the south via priv t lan • There i no internal circula-
tion within the ubject r a at thi tim • Before any d v lop-
m nt take plac within th ar , ace will have to b provid d.
Th can b t b accompl1 h d at th th ·properti ar
pl tt d.
'
,
-
(
(
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Pa g e -4-
•
0 -
I
REZONING REQUEST
Case #15-75
The area itself is very flat and open. There ar e
p resently seven occupied houses in the area, four of which are
on sites of one and one-half acre, or larger. The Parr property,
at the south end of the subject area, has approximately 4.3
acres and is used as a part of the Parr's residence and sod
farm. This use gives the effect of a large, landscaped area
when the grass is green and is quite pleasing. Mr. Parr uses
his industrially zoned property immediately on the east side
of the Brown Ditch as a storage area for his landscape business.
Mr. Parr has recently acquired several properties within the
I-1 Area.
There have been horses stabled on the Green property
for several years. The Code Enforcement Division of the De-
partment of Community Development has permitted a maximum of
four horses, as long as the adjoining Feistner property re-
mains undeveloped and open for grazing.
The flood of 1965 reached much of this area, as well
as much of Centennial Acres to the west. The 1965 flood was
a Standard Project Flood as defined by the Army Corps of
Engineers, which is of a much greater magnitude than the 100-
·year flood, the flood covered by the Flood Plain Ordinance.
According to the Army Corps of Engineers study done in 1963,
this area is well outside the predicted extent of the 100-
year flood area. With the completion of Chatfield Dam since
the 1963 Corps study, the extent of the 100-year flood has
been diminished.
Background of Previous City Action Relating to the Property:
This a rea was part o f a 30.2 acre area annexed to the
City of Englewood by Ordinance 16 of 1961. At that t im e, it
was the City policy that upon annexation, the annexed area
was simultaneously zoned R-1-A , Single-family Residence. This
was the most restrictive zone classification and was imposed
on all annexed land to serve a a "holding zone" until a proper
zoning for the area could be determined. The Courts have since
discouraged this practice and municipalities are given 90 days
following an ann xation to zone the area. Therefore, when
this ar a a annex d, it wa zoned R-1-A, Singl -! mily R id nee.
Shortly aft r ann xation, n requ t for rezonin !rom
R-1-A, Single-family Re idenc , to Y-1, Light Indu trial •as
submitted hy ome o! th property own r in the ar a. Th
r qu t a pproved by the Commi ion, but tabled ind fin
by th C ty Council in D c mb r o! 1961, primarily b cause
within th ar a could not agr on the zoning.
In 1963, th s area w r zon d to R-1-C, its pr s nt
zonin", a part o! the doption of th 1963 Compr h naive
'
•
(
(
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -5-
Zoning Ordinance.
•
-
I'
I
REZONING REQUEST
Case #15-75
In the summer of 1964, a small triangular-shaped
piece of the Parr property, which lies east of the Brown
Ditch and at a lower elevation than the property to the west
of the Ditch, was rezoned from R-1-C to I-1, Light Industrial.
Periodically over the years, different persons have
contacted the Planning Division about the possibility of re-
' zoning the subject area, or portions of the subject area.
They have been advised to meet with other property owners in
the area in an attempt to come to some agreement as to the zoning in the area.
, .
At the April 16, 1974, meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Commission, the property owners in the area south of
West Union Avenue and between South Decatur Street and the
South Platte River, were invited to attend to discuss a
traffic circulation pattern for this area. It was hoped that
the concensus of that meeting.would produce a traffic circulation
pattern that could be proposed as an amendment to the Master
Street Plan. However, the concensus of those property owners
at that meeting was that the need for c onsideration of circula-
tion pattern or street system within the area was premature.
Also at that meeting, Mrs. Maye Ferguson expressed a desire
to rezone her property and, hope f ully, some nei •hboring
properties in order to improve the development potential of the land.
On May 14, 1974, Mrs. Ferguson, !.Irs. Weaver, and Mr.
He nry Feistner arranged for a meeting with Mrs. Romans and
Mr. House o f the Planning Staff to discuss the possibility of
r ezoning this area to R-2-B, Two-family Residence. The density
perm i tted in the R-2-B Zone District was felt by Mrs. Ferguson,
Airs. Weaver and lr. Feistner to b compatible with the surrounding
ar a and, at the same time, would p rm it a more feasible use of
their l and in v iew ot the industrial zoni ng and uses to the
ea t. The need for acce s into the area, if it were to b
d v loped, wa di cu sed . During that meeting, Ir s . Ferguson,
Mr . W av r, and tr. Feistn r agr d that they would talk
with oth r prop rty o ners in the r a to see hether or not
th y ould join a ormal application for r zoning . At that
tim , they f lt that mo t of the oth r prop rty ow n ers would
b ngr abl to th r zoning. A t ff report, Case #13-74,
w pr nt d to th Commi ion on Jun 4, 1974, a a follow-
up to that me tin
No Commi ion action wa
orm 1 application for rezoning a
prop rty own rs until th on be!or
tim .
report and no
by a ny ot th
ion at thi
•
,
-
(
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -6-
•
-
Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan:
I •
REZONING REQUEST
Case #15-75
The Generalized Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Plan
suggests a medium density residential use for this area.
Comments from other Departments:
Department of Public Works: This office would have no
objections to the requested zoning change as outlined in your
memo of April 28, 1975 which relates, more specifically, to
, the area south of Union, east of Decatur. Our only suggestion
would be that the east line of the area, which would separate
the I-1 Industrial from the R-2-B, be changed to represent a
straight line north-south rather than following the irrigation
ditch. A north-south line through its entirety would more
probably follow a proposed street line.
Public Service Company -Electric Division: No
objection.
Department of Utili ti.es: The area in question, adjacent
to South Decatur, 1s access1ble to water service but not to
gravity sewer service.
Water service is available in West Union and on
South Decatur.
Part of the area is in the Valley Sanitation District;
however, the entire area would require lifting sewage to the
west, into Valley's lines. That action would necessitate
negot ia ting with the sanitation district.
The alternative to septic tanks is to carry sewage
easterly to th 66" in terce ptor that Littleton intends to
construct on the east side of the South Platte River.
Vall trict -Rea, Cassens & Associate ,
Inc. , ltlr. Cassens advised that the
Valley Sanitat1on District wag line is nearly used to
cap city now. Wh n the R-3-A zon d area north of let Union
Avenue and adj c nt to Cent nnial Park b ing con ider d for
d e v lopm nt nto a 50 unit multi-family , Mr. Ca n f 1t
that the additional wag load cr at d by that d v lopm nt
ould just about fill th V 11 y r lin to capacity. Th
ar a z on d R-3-A ha not b n d v lop d. If 50 units w re
develop d in th 14 acr ar a being con id red for R-2-B
zoning, th lin would th n b fill d to capacity. It gets
down to th f ct th t V 11 y S nit tion could accomaodat th
w e from !ifty additional unit in thi ar a and that th
f i r s t ppl cation s ubmitt d for rvic will probably get it
th i r t com -f i r t d principl •
tr. C th t nothe r and po ibly b tt r
,
'
(
•
•
0 -
;
STAFF REPORT
Page -7-
REZONING REQUEST
.Case #15-75
alternative to serve new development in the subject area
could be to carry the sewage east to the Littleton/Englewood ·
interceptor which will lie on the east side of the South
Platte River.
Department of Community Development Analysis:
Since the subject area was annexed to the City in 1961, it
has been the object of one formal request for rezoning to a
light industrial use and several informal requests or inquiries
as to the possibility of rezoning the area for medium-density
·residential use. This gives an indication that some of the
property owners in the area feel the land is not developable
as it is presently zoned. At least three property owners
have expressed a desire to sell their properties if a buyer
were available .. One owner has had their property listed for
sale and has been told the price that they felt necessary to
receive, was too high for single-family land in that location.
It appears then, that development of the area into single-
family lots of 6,000 sq. ft. may not be practical, especially
when considering the inhibitive financial climate prevailing
at the present time. The development of this generally open
land, however, could possibly become attractive if the per-
mitted density were increased slightly, as would be the case
if it were rezoned to R-2-B, as requested.
The maximum permitted density under the proposed R-2-B
zon i ng would be fourteen (14) dwelling units per net acre.
Under the present R-1-C zoning, approximately seven (7) dwelling
units per net acre would be permitted. The area requested for
rezoning is approximately 14 acres.
Inasmuch as the area i s not platted, it will be
nec e s sary to s ubdivide the area before any development takes
p l a c e. Ac ce s wi ll have to be provided within the area and,
as a rule o f thumb, approximately 25% o f the land in a de-
v e lopment i s d e voted to r ights -of-way. With thi i n mi nd, we
could assum e, n ot k now i n g how t he a r ea wi ll be l aid o ut , th at
there will b e ap proximately 10 .5 acre f or d e v elopment a n d
3.5 acre devot d to rights-of-way.
th
A r ult of
D r ctor of Publ i c
vi w o! thi r zonin
h a ugge t d tha t th
application ,
trian ular
•
,
-
(
c
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -8-
( ,.
•
0
•
t•
REZONING REQUEST
Case #15-75
area east of the Brown Ditch which was zoned 1-1 in 1964,
should be rezoned to the same classification as the land to
the west of the Brown Ditch. The division between the in-
dustrial and residential zoning in the area would then be on
a "straight line north-south rather than following the
irrigation ditch." The purpose would be that a "north-south
line through its entirety [the subject area] would more probably follow a proposed street line."
The Planning Division staff would not recommend this
action at this time. The purpose for rezoning the triangular-
shaped area in 1964, was because there is an approximately
nine-foot difference in grade between the low land to the
east of the ditch and the higher land to the west. The low
land was being used by Mr. Parr together with the contiguous
land, also owned by the Parra, that ~as zoned 1-1, Light Industrial.
The Commission and City Council agreed, following
public hearings, that the land was more properly zoned 1-1.
The land in that area on both sides of the "straight
north-south line" is owned by Mr. and Mrs. Parr and at such
time as it is determined that the street can and should be
extended south into Littleton, the zoning applied to the land
will probably have little effect on any arrangements that
will have to be made to acquire the land from the Parrs or
any future owner. The Brown Ditch forms a natural line of
demarcation between the two unlike zone districts and this
still appears to be more feasible than following a line that
can only be identified on a map or in a legal description •
•.
• •
-
/.~'
/'~·
•
/
•
0 I •
•
;
CITY OF .ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
MAY 13, 1975
I. CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Co~~ission
was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by Chairman Martin.
Members present: Jorgenson; Martin; Parker; Pierson; Smith;
Wade; Brown; Jones
Supinger, Ex-officio
.~e mbers absent: TanguQa
Also present: Assistant City Attorney Lee; Assistant Director
Romans; Associate Planner House
II . APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
~!r. Martin stated that Minutes of April 22, 1975, ·2tnd of April
30, 1975, were to pe considered for approval •.
Jorgenson moved:
Smith seconded:· The Minutes of April 22, 1975, and April 30,
1975, be approved as written.
Mr. Tanguma entered and took his place with the Commission.
AYES: Jones ; Jorgenson; Martin; Parker; Pierson; Smith; Wade;
Brown ~
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Tanguma
The motion carried.
III. CARL WIEBE REZONING
R-1-c to R-2-B
Parker moved:
·.
.. , .li .:
. ·~
Wade seconded: The Public Hearing be opened •.
CASE #15-75
AYES: Brown; Jones; Jorgen od; Martin; Parker; Pierson; Smith;
Tanguma; W d
NAYS: Non
Th motion carried .
• •
d
,
I•
•'
•
•
-
-2-r, \;{~~-'?:-
by the Commission before a decision can be reached. Mr. Martin -~£~~~; .. ."·'
asked that all those who wish to speak come to the podium and '~:_?:'7 _. ~
identify themselves. -~~~fi
l\lr. Ke ith Gray stated that he is ?.Ir. Wiebe's son-in-law, and ·-·~~~
that Mr. Wiebe is out of town this evening.· Mr. Gray stated 't:
that as he understands Mr. Wiebe's plans, a "semi-detached •
dwelling unit" would be constructed on the Feistner property,
which fronts on South Decatur Street. Mr. Gray discussed some
of the "rumors" that have been circulated regarding the requested
rezoning and possible development. Mr. Gray emphasized that as
he understood Mr. Wiebe's plans, it is for a semi-detached
dwelling unit. Mr. Gray stated that there would be approximately
, 1200 sq. f,t. per unit, and the two units would be separated by
a garage.
Mr. Martin asked when construction would begin, provided the
rezoning request were to be recommended by the Commission and
approved by City Council? Mr. Gray stated they hoped to begin
construction as soon as possible, and noted they were working
on blue-prints for construction now. ~
Mr. Martin asked ii Mr. Gray had had an opportunity to discuss
the matter of development with the Valley Sanitation District.
Mr. Tanguma noted that the staff report indicates Mr. Wiebe
in ten ds developmen t of prope rties owned by Ferguson, Tidwell,
and Weaver, as well as that of Feistner. Mr. Gray stated that
he d i d not know wha t Mr. Wiebe's intentions were. Mr. Martin
als o pointed o ut that the staff report states there would be
deve lopment o f a "series" of luxury double un:i1s. Mr •. Gray
stated that th is c ould be possible. Mr. Gray stated that he
has very r ece nt_ly come to the United States from Canada, and
that he is un familiar with Mr. Wiebe's proposal for the properties.
Mr. Broomhall, realtor for Mr. Wiebe, stated that i t is the
intent of Mr. Wie be to co nstruct doubles on the additional
propert ies .
Mr. Parker noted that if the rezoning is approved, there
could b a maximum of 14 units per acre constructed in this
area under the R-2-B zoning. Irs. Romans noted that the area
will have to be platted, and that the maximum ~evelopment
allowed is 14 units p r acre. ~Ir. Supinger empha ized that
public tr t right -ot-ay , tc. will com out of th gross
acr ; th 14 un it p r cr m ximum is "n t acreage", after
str t and oth r rights-ot-way hav b n d die ted. tr.
Suping r al o mpha iz d that this is unplatted land, and a
ubdivi ion will have to b approv d prior to issuance of any
bu ildi ng p rmit •
• •
•
•
I • -
/
( ,, { -3-
Mrs. Pierson no ·:ed that the staff report states Mr. Wiebe is
the "i ntended purchaser of the property"; she asked if Mr.
Wiebe has the property under option? 1\Ir. Broomhall stated
that the land is not under option, and that no offer has been
made. Mr. Tanguma asked, if this is the case, who is applying
for the rezoning? Mr. Supinger stated that the application is
signed by Mr. Wi e be. Mr. Supinger stated that under the terms
of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, a property owner or
purcha s er of property --one who has contracted to purchase
property, can apply for rezoning on the subject property and on additional property.
dr. L ee noted that it is not clear at this point whether or
not the applicant has a legal interest in the property, and
,ad vised the Commission to determine if, in fact, there is
interest on the part of the applicant such as an option, con-tract, etc. ; .. ;
Mr. 1\lartin asked if, in fact, .Mr. Wiebe does have any interest
in any of the property under consideration for rezoning? Mr.
Droomhall and Mr. Gray stated "no".. lrlr. Gray asked.~ how one
goes about getting property rezoned? Mr. Martin stated that
a property owner or one who has an interest in the land ---
such as an option, contract, etc., may request the rezoning.
Mr. Lee stated that if, in fact, there is no interest on Mr.
Wiebe's part in the property, that the application is invalid, and the hearing s hould be closed.
Mr. Broomhall stated that he was .under the impression that
th e app lication could proceed in the manner they have followed, nam ely , Mr. Wie be as applicant. ~
Mrs. Romans
n:onth
to com
th
" -
d
-
•
•
0 , .
•
-'1.-/ r .,
! . . .
#I assume, from th __
"interest" in the
(
statement, that Mr. Wiebl/f lid have an
property, and .proceeded on that basis.
Mr. Martin stated that if Mr. Feistner, ·Mrs. Fe~guson and
1\lr. and Mrs. Weaver were to have joined on the application,
the Commission could have proceeded with the Hearing; they
cannot continue the Hearing now.
~t~:j~
~~;":'J;
Mr. Supinger stated that it would require a new application
to be filed.
Mr. Lee cautioned that to proceed with the Hearing at this
point would be subject to action in Court.
' Mrs. Maye Ferguson
•2740 West Union Avenue-stated that her property is included
in the Valley Sanitation District, and
was included in 1964; she does have the right to tap onto the
sewer line. Mrs. Ferguson confirmed that she did meet with
Mrs. Romans approximately one year ago to discuss the feasibility
of the R-2-B zoning; an application was mailed to her, and she
did contact one or-two of the other property owners~ who were
not interested in rezoning at that time. Mrs. Ferguson stated
she understood t _hat Mr. Wiebe had just recently asked for the
R-2-B zoning, and that she, as a property owner in the area,
would be willing for him to go ahead with his request for re-
zoning.
Mr. Martin stated ·that until a person or persons who have a
legal interest in the land and property that is under discussion
make a formal application for rezoning, the Commissi.pn is not
in a position to discuss the matter. Any discussion ·on this
request will have to be postponed until a property owner makes
application or joins in an application with Mr. Wiebe. Brief
d i s c us ion followed. ·
Parker moved:
Tanguma econded : The Public Hearing be closed.
AYES: Jorgenson ; Jane
Parker ; Martin
NAYS : None
Brown; Wade ; Tanguma ; Smith; Pierson ;
Th moti on carried. r .
rtin d clar d a 10 mi n ute r c ss.
Th eting a c 11 d t o o rd r at 8 :50 p .m. by Chairman
tartin.
1 mb r p r nt: tar t in; J or enson; Jone
i th ; Pi rson ; P r k r
Dro n
Wad T ngu11a ;
'"'· .. ·~~· i'
'--:! ·1
'(:·: ,.
\
.....)
'
•
(
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -1-
Staff .Report Re:
•
-
REZONING REQUEST
Case #19-75
,. .
The rezonin g of approximately 14 acres from R-1-C,
Single-family Residence District to R-2-B, Two-family Residence District.
Date to be Considered:
June 17, 1975
Name and Address of Applicant:
B . L. & Wannita R. Weaver
2714 West Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Carl T. Wiebe
4488 South Federal Boulevard
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Names and Addresses of Pro perty Owners:
The County Assessor's records show the following as
owners of the properties in the area requested for rezoning:
Blanford and Agnes Duckett
2727 West Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Henry L. Feistner
11012 White l.Jountain Road
Sun City, Arizona 85351
?.laye M. Ferguson
2740 We t Union Av nu
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Ellen Green
2724 W t Union Av nu
Engl wood, Color do 0110
1
'
•
(
(
STAFF REPORT
Page -3-
•
-I•
( (
REZONING REQUEST
Case #19-75
2. The properties within the subject area are not
real istically developable under the R-1-C Zone
District, because of the proximity to industrially
zoned areas.
3. The area proposed for rezoning is more than "one (1)
City block in area", and therefore, complies with a
policy previously established by the City.
4. The proposed medium-density zoning would not be in
conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The maximum possible density permitted in the R-2-B
Zone District could be accommodated by those facilities
most directly affected, such as utilities and police
and fire services.
6. There are commercial, educational and recreational
facilities within the immediate area that could meet
those needs of the additional population that may come
about because of the rezoning.
Desc ription of Subject Site or Area and the Adjacent Area:
Th e area s urround ing the subject site has a mixture
o f uses. To the west is the Centennial Acres Subdivis i on,
which is zoned R-1-B, S i ngle-f amily Residence and completely
developed. Centennial Park, with 3.45 acres developod and
37.55 acres undeveloped, is to the north across West Un i on
Avenue. Adjacent to Centennial Park on the west, is an un-
d eveloped 2.3 acre site zoned R-3-A, Multi-family Re idence .
This site was zoned by Ord inance No. 24, of 1971.
The area to the east of the subject site is zoned f or
light indu trial development. There have been no new i ndustrial
buildings constructed in this adjacent area; however , the us
aro tho e p rmitt d in th industrial district. Further to
the t and mo t particularly along West Union Avenu , there
ha b n con iderable activity of an industri 1 nature.
Th r ar fiv in 1 -family r id nee in this I-1
r a south of W t Union Avenue. A trail r tora lot, hich
i in th City of Littl ton, adjoin th ubject ar a on th
outh.
-
''
(
(
' I
•
~
STAFF REPORT
Page -1-
Staff 'Report Re:
•
0
•
REZONING REQUEST
Case #19-75
The rezoning of approximately 14 acres from R-1-C,
Single-family Re sidence District to R-2-B, Two-family Residence
District.
Date to be Considered:
June 17, 1975
Name and Address of Applicant:
B. L. & Wannita R. Weaver
2714 West Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Carl T. Wiebe
4488 South Federal Boulevard
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Names and Addresses of Property Owners:
The County Assessor's records show the following as
owners of the properties in the area requested for rezoning:
Blanford and Agnes Duckett
2727 West Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Henry L. Feistner
11012 White Mountain Road
Sun City, Arizona 85351
Maye M. Ferguson
2740 We t Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Ellen Green
2724 W t Union Av nu
Engl wood, Colorado 80110
\ yn
2 00 \
Engl
ttyrtl I. Tid 11
t Union Av nue
ood, Colorado 80110
K. Tid 1
-
( -· ((
STAFF REPORT
Pa g -2-
•
0
•
B. L. & Wa nnit ta R. Weaver
2 711 Wes t Union Avenue
E n glewood , Colorado 80110
(
, .
REZONING REQUEST
Case #19-75 (
B. L. &. Wannitta Wea ver are property owners and reside
in the a~ a requested for rezoning.
Mr. Wiebe has an interest in purchasing one or more
parcels within the subject area.
Location or Address of Proposal:
The area requested for rezoning is located in south-
west Englewood , south of Centennial Park. The subject area
is bounded on the west by South Decatur Street, on the north
by West Union Avenue, on the east by what would be South Clay
Street extended, and on the south by the Englewood/Littleton
City Limi ts. (See Vicinity Map.)
Zone District :
R-1-C, Single-family Residence.
Description of Request :
With industrial zoning to the north, east, and south,
the appl icants fee l that development ol these properties cannot
ta !te place under the R-1-C zo ning ; hence, the request for the
R-2-B, Two-family Re i dence zoning. The applicants feel that
" ••• rezon ing of thee parcels to R-2-B would create an ideal
buffer zone between existing singl -family and indu trial
zoning. Thi would also b contiguous and complementary to
th e park a ero s Union Av nue."
Recommendation from th D partment of
th t tb
1.
nee
(
STAFF REPORT •.
Page -3-
•
-I •
(
REZONING REQUEST
Case #19-75
2. The properties within the subject area are not
realistically developable under the R-1-C Zone
District, because of the proximity to industrially
zoned areas.
3. The area proposed for rezoning is more than "one (1)
City block in area", and therefore, complies with a
policy previously established by the City.
4. The proposed medium-density zoning would not be in
conflict with the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The maximum possible density permitted in the R-2-B
Zone District could be accommodated by those facilities
most directly affected, such as utilities and police
and fire services.
6. There are commercial, educational and recreational
facilities within the immediate area that could meet
those needs of the additional population that may come
about because of the rezoning.
Description of Subject Site or Area and the Adjacent Area:
The area surrounding the subject site has a mixture
of uses. To the west is the Centennial Acres Subdivision,
which is zoned R-1-B, Single-family Residence and completely
developed. Centennial Park, with 3.45 acres developed and
37.55 acres undeveloped, is to the north across West Union
Av nue. Adjacent to Centennial Park on the west, is an un-
developed 2.3 acre site zoned R-3-A, tulti-family Residence.
This site was zoned by Ordinance No. 24, of 1971.
The area to the ea t of the subject site is zoned for
light industrial development. There have been no n w industrial
buildings con tructed in thi adjacent area; how ver, the use
tho e p rmitted in the industrial district. Further to
t and mo t particularly along West Union Avenu , there
n con iderabl act vity of an ind trial n ture.
Th
outh
1 in tb
outh.
re are !iv in 1 -family r idenc in thi 1-1
of W t Union Av nue. A trail r stora lot, which
lty of Llttl ton, adjoin the subject ar a on th
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -4-
•
•
REZONING REOUES1'
Case #19-75 ·
...
tion within the subject area at this time. Be fore any develop -
ment takes place within the area, access will have to be pro-
vided. This can best be accompli s hed at the time the properties
are platted.
·The area itself is very flat and open. There are
presently seven occupied ho~ses in the area, four of which
are on sites of one and one-half acre or larger. The Parr
property, at the south end of the subject area, has approximately
4.3 acres on which is the Parr's residence and their sod farm.
This use gives the effect of a large, landscaped area when
the grass is green, and is quite pleasing. Mr. Parr uses .
(
his industrially zoned property immediately on the east side _
of the Brown Ditch as a storage area for his landscape business.-·--
Mr. Parr has recently acquired several properties within the
I-1 area.
There have been horses stabled on the Green property
for several years. The Code Enforcement Division of the De-
partr-ent of Community Development has permitted a maximum of
four h orses, as long as the adjoining Feistner property re-
ma i ns undeveloped and open for grazing.
The flood of 1965 reached much of th is area, as \"lell (
as much of Centennial Acres to the west. The 1965 flood was
a Standard Project Flood as defined by the Arny Corps of
En "ineers, which is of a much greater magnitu de than the 100-
y c ar f lood, the flood covered by the Flood Plain Ordinance.
Ac cording to the Army Corps of Engineers study done i n 1963,
th i a r ea i s well outside th predicted ext nt of the 100-
ye ar f lood area. lith the completion of Chatfield Dam sinc e
the 1963 Corp study, the extent of the 100-year flood has
b e n dim i nish d.
Ba c k g round o f Prev i ou City Act i on Relating t o the Property:
This
City of E n gl
th
mult
w s th
on all
d
, and
t o zon
, wh
l y R
d
-
(
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -5-
•
-
(.
I•
REZONI NG REQUEST
Case #19-75
,. -
Shortly afte r annexation, a request f or rezoning from
R-1-A, Single-family Residence, to i\l-1, Light Industrial was
submitted by some of the property owners in the area. The
r e quest was approved by the Commission, but tabled indefinitely
by the City Council in December of 1961, primarily because
persons within the area could not agree on the zoning.
In 1963, this area was rezoned to R-1-C, its present
zoning, as part of the adoption of the 1963 Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance.
In the. summer of 1964, a small triangular-shaped
piece of the Parr property, which lies east of the Brown
Ditch and at a lower elevation than the property to the west
of the Ditch, was rezoned from R-1-C to I-1, Light Industrial.
Periodically over the years, different persons have
contacted the Planning Division about the possibility of re-
zoning the subject area, or portions of the subject area.
They have been advised to meet with other property owners in
th area in an attempt to come to some agreement as to the
zoning in the area.
At the April 16, 1974, meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Commission, the property owners in the area south of
West Union Avenue and between South Decatur Street and the
South Platte River, were invited to attend to discuss a
traffic circulation pattern for this area. It wa hoped that
the concen us of that meeting would produce a traffic circula-
tion pattern that could b proposed as an amendment to the
Master Street Plan. How ver, the concensus of those property
own rs at that me ting was that the need for consideration of
a circulation pattern or street ystem within the area was
premature. Also at that m eting, Irs. faye Ferguson expressed
a de ire to rezone her property and, hop fully, some neighboring
prop rtie in order to improve th developm nt pot ntial of
th 1 nd.
tb
r -
'
•
-•
-
STAFF REPORT
Page -6-
REZONING REQIJEST
Case #19-75
zoning. A staff r eport, Case #13-74, was presented to the
Commission on June 4, 1974, as a follow-up to that meeting.
No Com:n ission action was taken on the report.
On f.Jarch 25, 1975, Mr . Carl Wiebe applied for the ·
rez oning of this area from R-1-C to R-2-B. At that time, i t
was understood by the Department of Community Development
that the applicant had an agreement to purchase one of the
properties i ncluded in the rezoning area . However, at the
Public Hearing be fore the Planning and Zoning Commission on
May 13, 1975, Mr . Broomhall of Sitefinders Realty, Inc., wh o
represented Mr. Carl Wiebe, stated that he knew of no agree-
ment to purchase between the applicant, Mr.Wiebe, and any of
the property owners. Because of this, the Commission was
advised by Assistant City Attorney Lee that the Public Hearing
should be closed. Mr . Lee further advised that until such
time as a valid application for rezoning were made--an applica-
tion filed by a property owner within the area, or a person
holding an option to purchase property within the area--the
rezoning should not be considered. It was suggested by the
Commission that one or more of the property owners in this
area should sign the application for rezoning, md that it be
resubmitted.
Following this suggestion, B. L. and Wannita Weaver,
prop rty owners in the area, joined with Mr. Wiebe in making
application for rezoning from R-1-C, Single-family Residence,
to R-2-B , Two-family Re id nee, on May 14, 1975. The proper
posting of the area and notic in the official City ne p p r
have b en mad in preparation for th Public H aring to b
held on June 17, 1975.
Th Gen ralized Land
ugg ts a m dium-den ity r
Comments nts:
Plan of th Comprehen ive Plan
ntial u for th area.
(
"
(
(
(
(
•
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -7-
(
-
I (
REZONING REQUEST
case #19-75
Public Service Company -Electric Division: No
objection.
,. -
Department of Utilities: The area in question, adjacent
to South Decatur, is access~ble to water service, but not to
gravity sewer service.
Water service is available in West Union and on
South Decatur.
Part of the area is in the Valley Sanitation District;
however, the entire area would require lifting sewage to the
west, into Valley's lines. That action would necessitate
negotiating with the sanitation district.
The alternative to septic tanks is to carry sewage
easterly to the 66" interceptor that Littleton intends to
construct on the east side of the South Platte River.
Valley Sanitation District -Rea, Cassens & Associates,
Inc., consulhng engineers: Mr. Cassens advised that the
Valley Sanitation District sewage line is nearly used to
capacity now. When the R-3-A zoned area north of West Union
Avenue and adjacent to Centennial Park was being considered for
development into a 50-unit multi-family use, Mr. Cassens felt
that the additional sewage load created by that development
would just about fill the Valley sewer line to capacity. The
area zoned R-3-A has not been developed. If 50 units were
developed in the 14 acre area being considered for R-2-B
zoning, the line would th n be filled to capacity. It gets
do n to the fact that Valley Sanitation could accommodat th
wage from fifty additional units in this area and that the
first application submitted for s rvice will pr~~'bly get it
the first come-first s rv d principle.
tr.
alt rnativ
could b to carry
interc ptor which
Pl tte Riv r •
that another and po sibly b tt r
in tbe subj ct ar a
the Littl ton/Engl ood
a t s d of tb South
'
.. .
-
(r
STAFF REPORT
Pa ge -8-
•
-
(r
REZONING REQUEST
Case #19-75
,_
the owner has b ee n told the price that they felt necessary to
rec e ive was too high for single-faMily land in that location.
It appear s then, tha t development of the area into single-family
lots of 6,000 sq. ft . may not be practical, especially when
cons idering the inhi bitive fina ncial climate prevailing at
the presen t tiree. The development of this generally open
land, however, could ?OSsibly become attractive if the permitted
d ensity ~ere increased slightly, as would be the case if it
were rezoned to R-2-B, as requested .
The maximum permitted density under the proposed R-2-B
zoning would be fourteen (14) dwelling units per net acre.
Under the present R-1-C zoning, approximately seven (7) dwelling
units per net acre would be permitted. The area requested for
rezoning is approximately 14 acres.
Inasm~ch as the area is not platted, it will be
necessary to subdivide the area before any development takes
place. Access "ill have to be provided within the area and,
(
as a rule of thumb, approximately 25% of the land in a develop-
rr.ent is devoted to rights-of-way. With this in mind, we could
assume, not knowing how the area will be laid out, that there
will be approximately 10.5 acres for development and 3.5 acres
d evoted to rights-of-way. (
Becau e there are several different owners involved,
and th ey will not all want to ell or develop their land at
th s me time, it would e m that it would be to the be t
int re t ot all of th prop rty own rs to have an acceptable
plan for the developm nt of the ntire subject ar a, to which
plan, owners could plat as they do decide to divide their land.
\er th land to b a· mbled and develop d as a unit, a different
appro ch could b tnk n.
trial
on a " tra gbt
d
]~
(
I (
(
STAFF REPORT
P ag e . -9-
r
•
0
•
(
REZONING REQUEST
Case##l9-75
was being used by Mr. Parr together with the contiguous land,
al s o owned by the Parrs, that was zoned I-1, Light Industrial.
The Commission and City Council agreed, following
public hearings, that the land was more properly zoned I-1.
The land in that area on both sides of the "straight
north-south line" is owned by Mr. and Mrs. Parr and at such
time as it is determined that the street can and should be
extended south into Littleton, the zoning applied to the land
will probably have little effect on any arrangements that will
have to be made to acquire the land from the Parrs or any
future owner. The Brown Ditch forms a natural line o f demarca-
tion between the two unlike zone districts and this still
appears to be more feasible than following a line that can
only be identified on a map or in a legal description.
..
• •
'
•
•
/
.. ..
-'-~''·t ,_ .. I -· ~-,0 ,~ ..... \ . ·---. -l
t
I I I __.,.... __ , __ , I 9-A: l I 1 ... ~ .. I
I
. j • f I I t
' 0 j:
oJ
;?
__,---·
~--._----~--~~
l:J : W. SARATOGA AVE . • . • ,..-----y---.,---. r-.. . . . .
I
-~()-TL _. I ' I I I
~ ~ w.
~
* II
•
-'"
.... }Veaver-Wiebe Request for Rezoning · .
lVI a p R-1-C to R·2·B · ---·-· ----.. ----··------·---
AVE. E
1 , l
0
Blomberg I Porr 1; D
Bussord
I-1 Light lndystrial ......
1 1P] I "'": -----------l
~ Amb ler ~~ D :Cl ing ·
• !
• I
!
·-----~----···· --1 . 'I I
~-·--. --~ ~ 10 ~r 0 • i ,,,;,, I
I
I ~'"' ------------------~r! __ l 0 -• :0
•;.. Parr
1 ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I.
Light Industrial l •o• : .J , ••
-.. ---J,.;..:
scole I"= 2 "
Deportment o; Commun ity Development
mb 5-75
•
•
•'o ~~=
MAP~.N
\ 1-1 · Light Industrial
\
..
Qlj,. ...
oco o.•
"
request .for rezoning
from R-1-C to R.-2-E
ANNEXE.D AREA
I J \ \ -----· .. . . .
•Yf--unr.( ·i '. .J:~:j_w -'_ I: L ' __ ----~---~~.~--=;-~--==9_Ni() _____ A\LE-:C·~ .~ •• -.... , _ .• I ' I '""\"" . . T . ~ I I
DENVER
(Resi dent ial)
I "-... ' ·.I • 'I I I I
.• ·' _' '. : ~,~ !I I . . :AREA REQUESTED I
.·, I''' 1''1 l'' .. 1:: -____!FOR REZON 'ING ••• .. I lo t I . I t • u...-oAAN OR ·/ ..----"' .r l " I. j I l "j "' • : : I ~ • R!.l-r ' . •I , : ~ , I
r t? r· ( ( ·: : :, --, I '
I I ' ·• ,, .. 'I I l ' i ''' .. ~j ~l~ro fqtQiiY' '"'r _--· , .,_l .,. _j ;-:rr·~~$.1 ·~ I; l-"f·~ ~· ,_ ,,;·· I r t,/ ~,' .. ~ ... 11 .• t~;. I 1,
~t 4., I : · ~ -",..... : 1·1 •
t 'fl UAATOGA AVE , J 1 J I , •. ·:·i ·.i J;l .. ~··:.. :----L.ighfinpustrial :I ---~ __ 1-f., ·-r .: & ,i , .; .
0
1· • . • ,, .. ,, I I,, I • 1,.,. u• ... . : •• :,.,.,., 1 :
t 'fl (MUAHCO AY( I :
1 ·-~:··-.•. 1>' I' ..... -1_..._____i..It-{GL V,V,OOD. .. ..
~·":
~
ol I
I
LITTLETON I
B-2
Bus i ness
0 · ~I w·
<:31 (Busine ss) z .
Wj
_,_.(Industrial)
,
fr~~
sco lo 1"-400'
,.(~' .
-..... , ......... ~·
r I
~
•
" I
-
(
(
•
0 -
(
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING
JUNE 17,
I. CALL TO ORDER.
(
AND ZO~NG
1975
COA·frlliSSION
The regulnr meeting o f the City Planning and Zoning Commission
was called to order at 8:00 p.m ~ by Chairman Martin.
1\!embers present: Parker, Pierson, Smith, Wade, Jones, Jorgenson,
Mar tin
Supinger, Ex-officio
Members absent: Tanguma, Brown
Also present: Assistant Director Romans, Assistant City
Attorney Lee, Associate Planner House.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
Mr. Martin stated that Minutes of June 3, 1975, were to be
considered for npproval,
Parker moved:
Pierson seconded: The ~!inutes of June 3, 1975, be approved
as written.
Mr. Brown entered and took his place with the Commission,
AYES: Pierson, Smith, Wade, Brown, Jones, Jorgenson, Martin, Parker
NAYS: None
ABSENT : Tanguma
The motion carried.
III. WEAVER/WIEBE REZONING
li-1-c to R-2-8
Jorg nson moved:
CASE #19-75
Smith cond d: The Publi c II arin on Case r:!l9-75 be op n d.
AYES: Smith, Wad , Brown, Jon , Jor.:enson, lartin, Parker,
Pi rson
NAYS: Non
ABSE T: T n um
Th mot on nn·i d ,
\
·' ' • ;·. y
7
1-
(
(
•
(
Englewood Planning Commission
3400 South Elati Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Gentlemen,
•
•
;;;heridah
June 17, 1975
With reference to enrollments in Sheridan School District No.2,
I wish to give the following figures taken from the compiled attendance
reports on file in the Administration Office.
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
Fall, 1974
March 21, 1974
Total Enrollment
2244.1
2176.2
2043.9
2015
1937
The above figures show a decl ine in enroll nt over th past
f y ars. The present School Fin nc Ac contains a Au horized
v nue Base figure for each student enroll d. Th 5 erid n School
01strict would benefit financially if t roll nts ir.creased.
T ool District can accommod te addi io 1 s ud nt in the
pes t facilities.
S n~erely, /) ,
Ad/~~~./(.~
Carl P. Kusi~k~·
Assistant Superintendent
• t~M~ ............
f , y, • .,.,,,
f'•d It L , • ,., u r
p • .. "
'
• •
,
-
1 ..
c
(
•
•
I.
•
-
(
CITY m· ENGLEI'/OOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JUNE 17 , 197 5
CALL TO ORDER.
The regular meeting of th e City Planning and Zo ning Commission
was called t o o rder at 8:00 p.m . by Chairman Martin.
Members present: Par ker , Piers on, Smith, Wade, Jones, Jorgenson,
Martin
Supinger, Ex-officio
Members absent: Tanguma, Brown
Also present: Assistant Director Romans, Assistant City
Attorney Lee, Associ~te Planner House.
II. APPROVA L OF ii!INUTES.
Mr. Martin s tated that Min utes of June 3, 1975, were to be
considered for approval.
Parker moved:
P ierson seconded: The Minutes of June 3, 1975, be approved
as written.
Mr. Brown entered and took his place with the Commission.
AYES: P ierson, Smith, Wade, Bro~~on, Jones, Jorgenson, Iartin,
Park r
NAYS: None
ABSENT : Tang uma
Th motion arried .
II I. EAVER/WIEBE REZONING
'k-1-c to R-2-8
CASE ~19-75
Jorg n on noved:
Seith cond d: Th Public II aring on Ca e ~19-75 e op ned .
AYES: ' Brown, Jon I Jor(: n on , lartin, P rk r,
um
Th otion rri d,
•
,
l e:!!!!DI:I!III
•
•
• ;-
•
-2-
and Carl Wiebe requests an R-2-B, Two-family Residence District.
Legal notification of the Public Hearing was published in the (
Englewood Herald on May 29, 1975 .
Mrs. Romans submitted seven posting certifications to be
placed in the file.
Mrs. Romans then called attention to a letter from the
Sheridan School District stating that additional students
could be accommodated in that District; the letter further
sets forth the declining school population, and reads as
follows:
'
(
• •
,
1
(
(
•
•
•
, .
•
-(-~~~e!. \ r. 9da-3n-uu a ! U
Englewood Planning Commission
3400 South Elati Street
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Gentlemen,
June l7. 1975
With reference to enrollments in Sheridan School District No.2.
I wish to give the following figures taken from the compiled attendance
reports on file in the Administration Office.
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74
Fall, 1974
Narch 21. 1974
Total Enrollment
2244 .1
2176.2
2043.9
2015
1937
The above figures show a decline in enrollment over the past
few years. The present School Finance Act contains an Authorized
Revenue Base figure for each student enrolled. The Sheridan School
District would benefit financially if the enrollments increased.
The School District can accommodate additional students in the
present facilities .
•tl"'"'"' -
, ... " 10110
•
,
• " -
-
.. _
,,
Mr. Martin th b -~ed Mrs. Romans for her presentation, and then
set forth the ground rules for the Hearing. Proponents would
be given the opportunity to speak first, followed by opponents
to the request. He asked that all speakers come to the podium
and identify themselves by name and address. Mr. Martin asked
that those persons in favor of the rezoning speak at this time.
Mr. Bill Broomhall
Sitefinders Realty -stated that he was speaking for Mr. and
Mrs. Weaver, applicants, and for Nr. Carl
Wiebe, applicant. Mr. Broomhall stated that he felt the R-2-B
Zone District would be beneficial to the neighborhood as a
"buffer" zone. Mr. Broomhall stated that property owners who
wish to sell or develop their land would be denied the true
value of their -land if it is not rezoned. The present zone
classification will permit approximately seven units per acre;
we are talking about $6,000 raw land cost; with improvements
such as curb, gutter, paving, etc., the cost will rise from
$2,000 to $4,000, and the finished land cost would approximate
$9,000. Improvements would run about $45,000 and makes it
prohibitive to develop the area with single-family structures.
However, it could be economically feasible to develop as two-
family.
Mr. Martin asked if Mr. Wiebe had purchased land in the area
at this time, or if he has an option to purchase. Mr. Broomhall
stated not at this time.
Mr. Martin asked if there were anyone else to speak in favor
of the proposed rezoning? No one else indicated they wished
to speak.
Mr. Martin then asked for those persons opposed to speak.
Mr. Tidw 11
2720 W t Union
on
th
ha prop rty own r
in ppo ti on?
r
d th t
l
(
(
•
•
•
0 -
( -5-
Green, Duckett and Tidwell have all signed in opposition to the
proposed rezoning. Mrs. Pierson asked Mr. Tidwell if he had
approached oth er property owners in the subject area to sign
the petition. Mr. Tidwell stated he had not.
Mr. Martin asked who circulated the petition west of South
Decatur? Mr. Tidwell stated the "people in the area." Mr.
Tidwell stated there is no sewer available to the res i dents
of the subject area . Mr. Tidwell further discussed the matter
of police protection in the area; he stated the only location
he has ever seen patrol cars are in the park . Mr. Tidwell
stated there has been no trouble in the area and they have had
no occasion to call for police personnel; however, he does not
feel they "patrol" the area adequately. ?.Ir. Tidwell acknowledged
the Fire protection has improved since construction of the
Fire Station at Federal and Oxford in Sheridan.
Mr. Martin a~ked if Mr. Tidwell felt the police protection
would be improved if there were adequate access through the
subject area? Mr . Tidwell stated that it would possibly be
improved.
Mr. Jones asked if the portion of South Clay Street that is
de dicated is partial dedication or full dedication? l>Ir. Tidwe ll
stated he believed it is a 16' dedication.
Mr. Martin asked if Mr. Tidwell was aware of anyone who lived
in the area who might have wa nted to expand their residence or
construct a n ew residence who would have done so if the zone
classification had been other than the R-1-C? Mr. Tidwell
stated that he did not kno w o f any one who might have wanted
to do so; he stated that he had taken out a building permit
la st y ear for construction, but had to change his plans when
he ran into problems caused by inflation.
Mr . Parker asked if r.Ir. Tidwell was speaking for both J. D.
Tidwell and J. C . Tid ell? r. Tidwell stat d that the property
at 2722 W t Union Avenue has been sold by him.
r.tr. Brown a k d how nany p rson had signed the petition in
opposition? ~r. Tid1ell stat d there wer 91 signatur in
oppo it on •
Mr.Tidw 11 st t d th r could b 10 acr
v 1opment aft r d due ion of 25% of th
rights-of-way; th Compr h n ive Zoning
maximum of 14 dw 1ling units p r cr •
d v lopm n or 140 units in th area.
I • Smith a k d if
indu tri 1 zoning a
oppo. d to 11 h ndu
for d -
ar a for re t
Ord in nee p rmits a
This would 1low a
•
•
•
• • •
'(
Mrs. Pierson a ~d for further explanatio .. on the matter of
Police/Fire service in the area. Mr. Supinger stated that he
feels it is fair to say the Fire and Police service is better
in the area than it was prior to construction of the new Fire
Station at Oxford and Federal; there is a much better response
time for the fire equipment. The location of the fire station
was chosen by a computer program which was developed by Public
Technology , Inc., based on development patterns and response
time to given areas. Mr. Supinger stated there is one patrol
car per each square mile for the City, which is reasonably
,. .
high compared to other communities. The staff is of the opinion
there is adequate police and fire protection of the area.
Mr. Jones asked if this subject area is within the 100-year
' Flood Plain? Ak. Supinger stated he did not believe the area
is within the 100-year Flood Plain; it would, however, be within
the Standard Project Flood Plain, which is based on a 200 -250
year storm. Even if the area were within the 100-year plain,
this would not mean that development could not occur; there are
regulations which set certain standards that must be met on all
improvements constructed within a flood plain. Mr. Supinger
stated that he did not feel the 100-year flood plain would be
a problem, even if the area were found to be within that
designation.
Mr. Duckett
2727 West Union Avenue -stated he was opposed to the rezoning .
Mr. Duckett stated he believed people (
should live and let live; the people across Decatur to the west
invested money tv liv there . He stated he felt the action, if
approved, might depreciate their homes more than it would evaluate
the prop rty to th e east of South Decatur. Mr. Duckett referred
to th matter o f wer service, and noted that the Valley
Sanitation Distri t is limited on the amount of units it can
erv . tr. Duckett ~tat d h f lt the property owners on the
a t sid of South Decatur would b "impo ing" the zone change
on th n ighbors on th t side of South Decatur Street. He
stat d h f lt con id ration of a zone chang should be con-
aid r d time in th futur .tr. Duck tt reiterated that
h i d to th r zoning.
(
c
•
-
( (
-7-
Public Works Director Waggoner stated there are several ways
sewer lines could be financed: an Improvement District with
assessments on the cost of the improvements; all improvements
could be paid by the initial developer in the area with an
agre ement that all taps would be repaid on a pro-rated basis;
or, installation could be financed by the City and recoup costs
on a per tap basis.
Mr. Supinger pointed out that the Valley Sanitation District
has stated they have capacity to accommodate 50 additional
units rather than 50 taps.
Mr. Tidwell reiterated there is no sewer available to the
property owners in the subject site now; they are all on septic
tank, and all have their separate water systems. 1\!r. Tidwell
asked when the interceptor line was to be available for use?
Mr. Supinger stated that he understood it is to be operational
in 1978. Mr. Tidwell asked if taps would be made across the
river, or from Union? Mr. Supinger stated this would have to
be worked out at a later date; the staff is only trying to
indicate that plant capacity will be available.
Mr. Ray Curtis
2974 West Chenango -stated he is opposed to the rezoning.
Mr. Curtis stated there is a traffic
problem in the area, and they "don't need any more people down
there". Mr. Curtis stated he was referring to the race track
traffic; if South Decatur Street is extended to Belleview, it
will make the area more inaccessible than it is now for those
who live th re because o f the race track traffic. ~. Curtis
stated "it's like a zoo because of traffic now."
Ms. Tracy Hartman
2905 West Chenango -further discussed the problem of traffic
in the area. Mrs. Hartman noted there
~ere a numb r of homes with mall children, and the traffic,
particularly around the corner where her house is locat d, can
b e v ry hazardous to childr n. Mrs. Hartman stated that if
South Decatur is ext nd d to Belleview, they will not only
hav th traffic that i th re now, but an add i t i onal traf fic
burd n of p r on to and from th hopping center. lr • Hartaan
stat d th t th traffic tha trav 1 D catur from Un on to
Ch nan o going w 11 in of th 30 mph p d limi •
•
•
, -
;. -
-t)-
Mrs. Wade sta~~d that she was not aware South Decatur Street
is to be extended through to Belleview. Mr. Martin stated (
he did not think there were any inunediate plans for such ex-
tension.
Mrs. Maye Ferguson
2740 West Union Av e nue -stated the Valley S anita tion District
sewer l i ne runs down South Decatur.
hlrs. Ferguson stated that the only way persons living on the
east of South Decatur would have access to use the sewer line
is by application to the Sanitation District; she stated that
she and her husband had made application to the District in
1964, and have the right to tap onto the sewer line. There is
sufficient capacity available to acconunodate 50 units. Mrs.
Ferguson stated that she felt there would be approximately 7
acres to b e developed if the rezoning is approved, three acres
of which are hers. ~Irs. Ferguson discussed the problem of
rising assessments on her property in the last two years; she
noted that she cannot do anything on the property to bring in
income, and that she is retired and the financial burden is
quite difficult. ~~s. Ferguson stated that there is police
protection in the area, and that they quite frequently patrol
the area.
lllr. Broomhall staled that he had called lr. Feistner in Sun
City, Arizona, and that Mr. F i tn r is in favor of the re-
zoning. He is to send lr. Broomhall a letter to that effect.
1\lr. Broomhall stated that he und r tood lt~. Parr is also in (
favor of the re~oning, but that he cannot officially speak for
1\lr. Parr.
Mr. Tidwell again poke on th matt r o f the r zoning. He
stat d there is approximately 14 acres total in the entire
ar a; if t reet s have to be d dicat d p rior to obtaining building
permits, th is ~ould decrease th developable area to approxi-
mat ly 10 acr s. l.1r. Tidwell stated that if the maximum de-
v lopm nt p rmitted is 14 units per acre , this could result
in 140 unit on the 10 acr , which is quite in xcess of the
50 units V lley Sanitat ion Di tri t states they can accommodate •
-
(
(
•
•
•
... -
/'
( -9-
(
expensive, and he felt the persons in the area should be aware
of this fact. Mr. Clinger stated there would also be expense
involved in d veloping streets, curb, gutter, sidewalks, etc.
...
Mr. Supinger stated that the improvements that would need to
be installed to serve th is , or any other area, are based on
user fees; if the sewe r line we re needed only to serve the
area in question, it would have to be financed by the own ers
of the p r op erty so served. Mr . Supinger stated tha~ all stree t
improvements are the responsibility of the property o wners to
finance. Mr. Supinger stated that any new street constructed
in the area would be constructed by th e developer to standards
set forth in the City regulations. Adjoining properties that
are b enefitted by such improvements are assess ed the cost of
those improve~ents.
Discussion ensued . Mr. Martin stated he did not want to lose
sight oi the question under consideration; if this area is
rezoned, it will mean that some of the land will have to be
dedicated for street ri ghts-o f-way . Mr. Martin stated he does
not think there is a definite problem at this point regarding
the sewer lines. Mr . Clinger stated "there are a lot of people
present toni g ht that aren't aware of the cost of what is being
looked at ."
Mr. Duckett stated he felt those persons wishing to sell their
property could get top dollar value for their land right now
\>i thout g oing through the rezoning. Mr. Duckett stated "we
have a few people who want to n:ake a mint on somebody else"; if
they want to sell, do so and let someone else come in. M:.
Du ckett stated that "Mr • t ' r uson says she is carrying the
burden" re gardi ng taxes, t c.: he noted that s he should sell
her land and "not cause the r st of the people a lot of static ."
Parker moved:
Jones s conded : The Pub lic H aring be closed.
Irs . Wndo asked for a shov. of hand of persons in favor of
tn propo_ d r zoni ng; five p rson indicated they were i n
fa~or . Upon request, 20 person indica ted oppo ition to the
r zoning.
oint d out that the udi nc hould b aware
th ~y ar no voting on the 1 u • ~. ~rtin gr ed, nd
that th d ci ion ~ould be mad by th m ob r or th
d:
nnny oppon nt r ided .a·t o
id d ' st of South D catur.
·tot 0 catur;·l2 nd i c t d thy
, Oro n, Jon., Jar n.on, M r in, Parl r, Pi ron,
'
•
'
•
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tang
The motion carried.
•
-
Mr. ?>lartin stated the Conunissio:-t wol~ld not reach a decision
on the request at this meeting; he stated that the Co~~ission
has considerable material to be considered further before
reaching a decision,
Mr. ~3rtin declared a recess at 9:15 p.m.
The mee t ing was called to order at 9:25p.m.
PRESENT: Brown, Jones, Jorgenson , ~lartin, Parker, Pierson,
Smith, Wade
ABSENT: Tanguma :
Mr. Martin declared a quorum present .
IV. MASTER STREET PLAN
AmendJnent
CASE #20-75
Wade moved :
Smith seconded: The Public Hearing on Case #20-75 be opened.
AYES: Wade, Brown, Jones, Jorgenson, Martin, Parker, Pierson,
Smith
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion carried.
Mr . Supinger stated that the current Master Street Plan as
adopted as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan in 1969. The
adopt ·on was after Public Hearings before both th Planni Coo-
mission and City Council and affirmative action o! both bodies.
The Comprehcnsiv Plan was then recorded with the Arapaho
County Clerk and R corder. Be for any amendm nts to the .I st r
Str et Plan, or any part of the Comprehensive Plan M y b made,
th same proc dur mu.:lt be followed. !r. Supinger t ed that
con id ration of th ~ast r Str et Plan at this tim ~ 1 th
t· ~ul t o1 a request froM City Coun i 1 that th Co1'\llli i on c on-
id r th one-ay str t pa t rn. Th Commls i on det rMin d
to tnl~ :• look t th r 11 Ma r Str t Pl n and t mak
·omm nd tion to(' Council. ~tr. Suping'r tat d
time rcvl wing th Xibt n~
on cp \ 'th om propo d a o
·on idor d at h Public H
.. lr . ~ uplnG r s t orth th l'Opos d m ndJn n t o tl T'l n,
\\hich r ollo ·
(
'
I
Yale Avenue
(
u. s. 285
Tufts Avenue/Union Avenue
Chenango Avenue
Lowell Boulevard
Zuni . Street
Tejon Street
Platte River Drives
(
Columbine Freeway Corridor
Windermere Street
Huron Str t
Fox Street
Elati Str t
Del war Str t
w
~r . tr n
•
•
0 -
-11-
Remove designation as an
"Arterial" from Broadway to
Federal; designate as a
"Collector" from Broadway to
Elati.
,._
Change designation from a "Freeway"
to that o f an "Arterial".
Designate as an "Arterial" from
Windermere to Federal.
Continue "Collector" designation
east to South Logan Street and
west from Bannock to Huron.
Designate as a "Collector".
Up-grade to an "Arterial" and
extend designation between Evans
and U. S. 285.
Reduce designation from an
"Arterial" to that of a "Collector"
between Evans and Dartmouth.
Delete designation as a "Collector"
south of West Dartmouth Avenu -.
Delete.
Divert designation as an "Arterial"
to Navajo Street alignment between
Tufts and Oxford.
Designate as a "Collector" be-
tween Quincy and Belleview.
Remove designation as a "Collector"
between U.S. 285 and Bell view.
D ignat as "Coll ctor" b -
tw n Yale nod ~ nyon.
D ign t a "Co 1 ctor" from
nyon to B 11 vi
0
to ap ak
d th y
1n opp 1 ion?
•
.. .
•
•
•
Mr. James Walsh
3242 South r•ati-stated that when tl shopping center was
constructed, there was a guarantee it would
not disrupt the residential area to the north; if the island
at Floyd and Elati is removed, it will definitely disrupt the
residential area, and South Elati Street will be a "drag strip"
from Dartmouth south. Mr. Walsh stated there are many children
in the area, who ride their bicycles in the street, and it will
prove hazardous to those children.
Mrs. Pierson suggested that persons wishing to speak regarding
one particular street should be heard consecutively, and then
proceed to another proposed amendment to hear comments. The
Commission agreed, and Mr. Martin asked that all those who
wished to spea~ regarding South Elati Street would be heard at
this time.
Mr. Homer Todd
3258 South Elati -stated he felt designating South Elati Street
as a collector would cause problems with the
Police/Fire center, and their needed access to South Elati.
1\lr. Todd stated there have been several meetings regarding the
removal of the island, and the property owners have had "to
protect Elati many times." Mr.Todd then discussed the location
of the school on Dartmouth and Elati and stated he felt designa-
tion of F.lati as a collector and removing the island would en-
danger the children who attend that school.
Mrs. Mary Walsh
3242 South Elati -asked if designation as a Collector Street
would necessitate widening of the street
and restriction of parking, or would it remain a two-lane street?
Public Works Director Waggoner stated that the widening of the
street or restriction of parking would depend on the traffic
the street carried. Right now, he tated he could not forsee
more then a two-lane street with parking on each side. lr.
Wa g goner stated there are no plans to widen South Elati at this
time •
Arthur Ku l p
3274 So u h l t i -
on d
th r
ould h ar
0 -
( (
(
..
-13-
Mr. Supinger stated he felt the implication is clear that if
Elati is designated as a Collector, the traf fic island at
Floyd would be removed; there would be additional traffic on
the street. Mr. Supinger stated that the total proposal is
for the designation of Delaware/Elati to serve as collector
streets from Yale t o Bellevi ew throug h the western portion of
the City. The purpose is to fun nel traffic from the local
streets to the arterial streets --it does not mean that all
traffic will use the collectors as thru streets. Mr. Supinger
stated he could not say there will not be additional traffic
on the street.
Mr . Kulp noted that the traffic into the shopping center is
...
only impeded by the stop sign at Floyd Avenue. ~tr. Kulp noted
that Bannock and Sherman are serving as collector streets now,
and are handling the traffic very well. Mr. Kulp stated he
could see no real reason for removing the island at Elati and
Floyd, and designating Elati as a collector street. He stated
that everyone who lives in a residential area wants to keep
traffic at a minimum; Mr. Kulp acknowledged that many motorists
do "go around" the island, but it does reduce the speed of those
motorists. ~tr. Kulp reiterated he is opposed to the removal
of the island.
Mr. Martin asked if there was a formal document drawn that
stated the residents north of Floyd Avenue would be protected
from the traffic to and from the shopping center?
Mrs. Martha Scott
3231 South Elati Street -stated when the initial plans were
drawn, South Elati was to have a
closed median as Delaware has; th r would be no cc s through
the median. The median, when construct d, was op n, but an
island was put in th Elati int rsection in an f!ort to block
through traffic, but p rsons do go around the i land. Irs. Scott
stat d she w unaw re or a "formal" docum nt that ould provide
protection to tho e r idents north of Floyd, but that the
initi 1 plans did provide uch prot ction, and th rc idents
w r under th imprc sion that th y to h v uch prot ction.
-
•
•
•
\.
Discussion f lowed. Mr. Parker stated that whether or not
the Floyd Avenue Agreement is a binding document should make (
no difference; the City has a moral obligation to leave the
traffic island at Elati and Floyd. Mr. Parker stated he felt
the City may well have been in error in the removal of the
Cherokee/Floyd island.
Mr. Walsh and Mrs. Scott both asked that the residents of the
area be notified of any meeting where the matter of the island
removal would be considered. Mrs. Scott stated there are only
three or four families in the block that have not expressed an
opinion regarding the island removal. 1\lrs. Scott then read
the following letter from 1\lr. Einer Burget stating his opposition
to the proposal.
(
• •
,
(
(
•
-
l -15-
Mr. Dennis Kelley
2393 West Warren -stated that he was present regarding the
proposed designation of South Zuni Street
as an arterial and the proposed change in designation on South
Tejon from arterial to collector. Mr. Kelley stated that
South Zuni Street goes through a residential area, and Tejon
serves the industr i al area to the east. Mr . Kelley stated
that Zuni could not extend through to u.s. 285 --there is
an industrial development in the way. Mr. Kelley stated there
was no reason to designate Zuni as an Arterial --it cannot
carry the traffic flow that an arterial street should carry.
Furthermore, it is near the school and the children have to
walk either on South Tejon or South Zuni to get to the school
from the north. Designation as an arterial would increase
the traffic tnrough the residential area.
Mr. Capesius
2350 West Warren -stated that he agreed with Mr. Kelley's
statements; he added that police protection
on South Zuni Street is "terrible" because it is partly within
the City of Englewood and partly within the City of Denver, and
neither Police Department seems to want to assume responsibility.
Mr. Capesius stated the Police Department does partol the east -
west streets. He noted that there is considerable truck traffic
through the residential area, however, which should be rerouted
,. .
to South Tejon. 1\lr. Capes ius stated that South Zuni Street does
not have sidewalks for the children to walk on, and if additional
traffic were to be introduced on that street it would be hazardous
to the children. Mr. Capesius stated there is no protection for
the children now --no school zone signs or any similar notice
there is a school in the area. Mr. Capesius suggested that
the art rial designation should remain on South Tejon Street,
and that South T jon could be improved.
. 2 s.
r may
t rson
0
-
• ,. .
I• -
-Hi-(
Mr. Waggoner Stated that application has been made for Federal
funding under the Urban Systems Program, and a project number
has been assigned to the South Zuni improvement. Denver has
money budgeted for improvement of Zuni from Yale to Dartmouth;
Englewood also has funds budgeted for this improvement. Mr.
Waggoner stated that he felt the Environmental Impact Statement
is the only thing holding up the improvement. This would in-
clude the purchase of right-of-way on Denver's side, and the
relocation of five homes in that area.
Mr. Brown asked for further clarification on the problems with
police protection in the area. Ur. Capesius stated that if a
Denver patrol car sees a speeder on the east side of the street,
it is Englewood's responsibility; if an Englewood patrol car
sees a speeder .on the west side of the street, it is Denver's
responsibility, and if there is an accident in the middle of
the street "there are arguments" on whose responsibility it is.
Mr. Capesius stated he felt they had the best luck with the
Denver Police Force.
Mr. Brown then asked about the lack of signing for school
children. Mr. Capesius tat d that requests have been made
three times in the pa t y ar for signing along South Zuni;
they have asked the School Board, th Principal, etc., and
nothing has been don •
Mr. Waggon~r stated that no formal r quest has been submitted
to his office for signing. He tated he did not realize that
children were required to ''eros " Zuni to get to school. He
stated that the "flashing light i in talled in uch instances
her children arc requir d to cro a treet near a chool.
lr. Waggoner not d if children alk " long" a street, it does
r quire different si ning than if childr n "cross" a street.
lr. K 11 y tat d th y ju t nt d 1 ning indicating there
as a chool ne rby, nd that motorist hould watch for th
childr n.
Jr. K lley tat d h
c n do the job that i
mo r tr ff ic introduc
hou ld b given to th
Doug l Sha t r
Co lor do Di v i i on o
another treet
e any n d for
that con id ration
(
'
1 t
-
(
•
•
-
( I -17-
Mr. Supinger stated he fe lt the designations were the same.
It was determin ed it would be pretty unlikely there would
be a "freeway" along the U.S. 285 route. Mr. Supin ger did
acknowledge there are some severe traffic problems along this
corridor.
Mr. Shaffer stated he was told there is some money budgeted
for study of U.S. 285; he stated he did not know if the City
had participated or plans to participate in a study.
Mr. Waggoner stated that a Freeway has controlled access, which
U.S. 285 does not. A Freeway would have interchanges rather
than at-grade crossings as U.S. 285 has. Mr. Waggoner stated
the City staff did not feel there was a possibility of getting
interchanges on crossings on U.S. 285, or of getting access
roads on either side of the highway. Mr. Waggoner stated he
felt this is one of the basic reasons for the change in designa-
tion from Freeway to Arterial. Mr. Waggoner stated that in
1973, $20,000 was budgeted in the Highway Fund for study on
U.S. 285 adjacent to Cinderella City to try to come up with
alternates to handle the traffic flow. ~~.Waggoner stated
that a letter has been submitted to Mr. Brasher of the State
Highway Department asking the status of the $20,000.
Mr. Shaffer then asked about the Columbine Freeway; he asked
if the staff was referring to Santa Fe Drive, or to a location
west of Santa Fe Drive? Mr . Supinger stated the proposal is
to remove the alignment of the corridor as previously shown on
the Master Street Plan. Mrs. Romans stated that improvement
of South Santa Fe Drive to a 6-lane major arterial has been
discussed.
tr. Shaff r tated that studi show there is a need for a
fr eway through th area in this approximate location. Mr.
Martin sugg t d that if n d b , the corridor could b r -
designat d at a lat r dat •
th City of Engl ~ood ubmitt d tb ir
so that it can be included in th JRPP
.~. haff r
stre t plan
Map and pl
a k d i
to DRCOG
n . lr . 4artin t t d h the t ff would
AH
thi
on
r
don .
t · n, P rl
d.
n, t • d •
-
-.LO-
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion carried .
•
I•
•
l\lr, Martin aske d the Commission what they wished to do on this
matter.
Parker moved:
Pierson seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City
Council the proposed amendnents to the
Master Street Plan, with the deletion of South Elati Street
as a Collector from Yale to Kenyon, and the deletion of South
Zuni Street as an arterial; the designation on Tejon Street to
be changed frbm the proposed collector back to the existing
arterial designation.
Jones moved:
Brown seconded: The matter of the Alaster Street Plan amendment
be tabled for further opportunity to study the
affect of the proposed amendments on the total Plan.
AYES: Martin; Smith; \fade; Jones; Jorgenson; Brown
NAYS: Parker; Pierson
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion carried.
Jones moved:
Parker seconded; The matter of th Master Street Plan amendment
be considered at the next regular meeting of
the Plann i n g Commission; the staff is asked to prepare detailed
inf ormat i on f or the Commission on the items discussed at this
me eting .
a.
Th vot w
Th tion rri d.
d ignation an art rial
r c ons i der d ; stat d she
d ignat d a a coll ctor,
nt nn i al Park nd go into a
m1.th, d , Bro n , Jon , Jorg n o n,
(
•
•
•
(
V. PROPOSED UJtDINANCE
Mov1ng & Demol1 bon
of Structures
•
•
( -19--
CASE #2-75
Mr. Supinger reviewed the changes in the proposed ordinance
that were made following the Public I~aring on June 3, 1975.
Parker moved:
,. -
Wade seconded: Draft V, dated June 11, 1975, of the proposed
ordinance on Movement and Demolition of Structures
be recommended to City Council for approval.
AYES: Pierson, Smith, Wade, Drown, Jones, Jorgenson, Martin,
Parker
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion carried.
VI. CmtPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE
R-2 Medium Density District
R-3 High Density District
Case #17-75
Case #18-75
Amendments that were made to the e two proposed Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance Amendments following the Public Hearing June
3, 1975, were pointed out to the Commission.
Mr. Jllartin stated that lr. Rich Di ckmann had wanted to speak
to the Commission on this matter this evening, and that he had
advised Jllr. Diecl~ann that th hearing had been closed on
Jun 3, 1975. 1\lr .. tart in tatcd h informed Mr. Dieckmann
that South Suburban Board of Realtors had submitted a lett r
ontaining some ug e ted chanae to the proposal, which the
Commis ion did tak id ration •
•
I • -
-20-
(
developed, provide d the frontage is not less than 60 feet,
and the area not less than 7,200 square feet. Mrs. Romans
stated she felt this is a good provision, and perhaps it
should be modified to apply to the proposed R-3 District.
Jone s moved:
Wad e seconded: The Planning Co=ission rec01r.mend to City
Council the approval of the proposed amend-
ments to th e Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as set forth in
Draft V, dated June 3, 1975, the proposed amendments being
the R-2 1\ledium Density District, and the R-3 High Density
Di s trict.
'. AYES: Smith, Wade, Brown, Jones, Jorgenso n, Martin, Parker,
Pierson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion carried.
VII. DIRECTOR'S CHOICE
Mr. Supinger stated the staff had a very productive meeting
with property o wners in the Santa Fe/Union Annexation area,
and felt that most of the problems had been worked out. He
(
stated he fel t the proposed street plan is in order, and that ()
a Public Hearing date could be set. Discussion followed. It
was determined that a Public Hearing on the Master Street Plan
for th Santa Fe/Union Annexation Area would be set for July
22nd.
Mr . Supin r tat d that of resolutions passed by C i ty
Council hav b n submitt d to th Commission; these resolutions
rn d wi th the Park nd Rid Facility locat i on for RTD,
inprov m nt of S~uth S nta F Drive.
III. CO ISSION'S CHOICE
t.lr . Jon
h n th
v nin •
Th
n
t t d that h ~ould lik to ugg st th at all
sion m ~tin s would b gin at 7:00 p .m. r ther
nt d
B rd
hat
nd
nt indic t d th y ould pr r th 7:00 p ••
-
(
•
I•
•
\
MEMORANDUM TO ( ~ ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL
RECmlMENDATIO!'i OF THE CITY PLANNING AND
>ARDING ACTION OR
vNING COMMISSION.
DATE: June 17, 1975
SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance re: Movement and Demolition
of Structures.
RECOM!I!ENDATION:
Parker moved:
Wade seconded: Draft V, dated June 11, 1975, of the proposed
ordinance on 1\lovement and Demolition of
Structures be recommended to City Council for
approval.
AYES: Pierson, Smith, Wade, Brown, Jones, Jorgenson, ~lartin,
Parker
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission.
~-:t~~L ~ Gerruae :~ty
Recording Seer tary
'
• •
,
-
•
•
•
-22 -
MEMORANDUM TO l'HE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RECO!.CIENDATIO:-i OF TtiE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: June 17, 1975
SUBJECT: Amendment of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
Jones moved:
Wade seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City
Council the approval of the proposed amend-
ments to the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance as set forth in
DRAFT V, dated June 3, 1975, the proposed amendments being
the R-2 Medium Density District, and the R-3 High Density
District.
AYES: Smith, Wade, Brown, Jones, Jorgenson, Martin, Parker,
Pierson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Tanguma
The motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission.
R cording S cretary
(
'
(
•I
• •
,
-
(
•
•
0 ,. -
i.
,., . l
MEMORANDUM TO T. ~ ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL -~ARDING ACTION OR
RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
•'•
DATE: July 22, 1975
SUBJECT: Approval of Weaver/Wiebe Rezoning Reque*t·
RECOMMENDATION:
Parker moved:
Wade seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City
Council the area bounded on the north by West
Union Avenue, on the east by South Clay Street extended, on
•the south by the Englewood/Littleton City Limits, and on the
west by South Decatur Street, be rezoned from R-1-C, Single-
family Residence, to R-2-B, Two-family Residence.
AYES: Smith; Wade; Brown; Jorgenson; Martin; Parker; Pierson;
NAYS: Jones ·
ABSENT ;-Tanguma
The motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission.
l.titit!wi. ~
Recording SecretarY
(
·r
(
• •
(
(
(
. .
•
0 -
r _go_
a school zone. Mr. Brown stated he would again check into
the matter to see if such signs could be installed.
~lr. Jorgenson asked the definition of a "Temporary" structure,
and made reference to the Majestic Savings building at Belleview
Avenue and South Broadway. He asked how long is "Temporary?"
Mr. Supinger stated he would check into this matter.
Mr. Tanguma asked what procedure to follow to require controls
at the railroad/Windermere/Tufts/Santa Fe crossing? Discussion
followed.
The meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
.
~t;~A, ~n~~r
'
(
• •
,
"I
r; ..
•
•
-
(' \ (
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCIL~~N SOVERN
BY AUTHORITY
ORDINANCE NO. ~0 , SERIES OF 1975
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND REENACTING SECTIONS
22.4-5 AND 22.4-6 ENTITLED "R-2-A AND R-2-B RESIDENTS DIS-
TRICT", OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD COMPREHENSIVE ZONING
ORDINANCE tORDINANCE NO. 26, SERIES 1963, AS AMENDED)
.,_
WHEREIN SAID SECTIONS RELATE TO PERMITTED USES, MINIMUM LOT
AREA, MINIMUM FLOOR AREA, MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE OF LOT COVERAGE.
MINIMUM FRONTAGE OF LOTS, t.IIN UIUM YARD REQUIREMENTS, HEIGHT
REQUIREMENTS, ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, SIGNS AND CONDITIONAL USES.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ENGLEh'OOD, COLORADO, as follows:
Section 1.
That Sections 22.4-5 and 22.4-6 of the Comprehensive
Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 26, Series 1963) are hereby
repealed and reenacted to read as follows:
22.4-5 R-2 Medium Density Residence District
One of the goals of the citi~ens of Englewood is
to encourage a variety of hou ing to meet the needs of the
differing income levels and th varying family structures
by emphasizin qual1ty of development through the u e of
innov t ive and w 11-designed d velopm ntal procedures.
This
fro111
excep
•itat ons o
•
-
' ..
r '.
'
•
•
-
f ('
the size and extent of such non-residential activities. This
District is protected against encroachment of general comm-
ercial or industrial u ses while the regulation s permit dev-
elopment consistent with the concentration of persons and land
valuation in the area.
a. Supplementary regulations. The provisions found
in this Zone D1str1ct shall be subJe ct to the requirements
and standards found in 22.5, Supplementary Regulations,
unless otherwise provided for. in this Ordinance or an amendment
hereto.
b. Permitted principal uses.
(1)
(2)
(3)
Single family dwelling.
Two-family dwelling, with at least one party
wall and under a common roof.
Multi-family dwellings not exceeding 14 units
per acre. Planned Development approval is required
for four or more units.
c.
(4)
(S)
(6)
(7)
Religious institutions.
Educational institutio ns.
Public facilities. (Amn'd. by Ord. No. 35,
Series of 1971)
Day Care cen ters.
Minimum area of lot.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(S)
Single -family dwelling •.•.•...•••••.••••••• 6,000
Two-family dwelling ...•.•.•...••..•••.••.•. 6,000
Each addi tion al unit ..........•.•......•••. 3,000
(Amn'd. by Ord. No. 35, Series of 1971)
Day Care cen ter s ..............•..•..•.••.•. 6,000
All othe r permitted uses .•...•••....•.••.• 42,000
d. Minimum floor area.
(1) Single-family dwellin~ •..•...•••.•••••••....• sso
(2) Two or more-family dw llings:
efficiency and/or one bedroom ••••••••.••• 650
two bedroom unit •.•........•.•...•..••.•. 7SO
thr bedroo unit .....•.••..•...••.••..• 9SO
each .ddition 1 bedroo .................. 110
lot CO\'er:l e.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
sq.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ft.
ximum p rc nt a ot lot cov r & ...................... 30\
(Covered parking facilitle ncluding carports
nd ar g ar no con idered a lo >OV r ge.)
·2-
'
•
I
•
•
-
,, ( '' (
f. Minimum useable open space.
Minimum useable open space .....................•......•• SO\
40 \ of wh ich shall be ifi the required front yard
g. Minimum landscaping.
Minimum landscaping ......................•...•..••• 15\
h. Utili ties.
Utillties service to buildings in new developments
must be placed underground.
i. Minimum frontage of lot.
j.
k.
(1) Single family dwelling ......•.....•.••.....• SO feet
(2) Two -fa~ily dwelling ....•...•.....••. : ...•••. SO feet
(3) Each additional dwelling unit ....•.•.......• 25 feet
(Amn'd. by Ord. Nc. 3~, Series of 1971)
(4) Day Care centers ............................ SO feet
(5) All other permitted uses ......•...•••..•.•• 200 feet
Maximum height of butld1ng. ..
Principal building --2 -1/2 stories •..•••••..•••• 25 feet
Minimum front yard.
All permitted principal use s ..................... 25 feet
1. Minimum .ide yard.
(1) Single family dwell inc ......•.... • • • • · · · • • · · 3 feet
(Tot3l 10 feet for both sides)
(2) Two or more dwell i ng units ..•.•.•....•..•••. 5 feet
(Total .!4 feet for both sides) (Amn'd. by Ord. 'u. 35, Series of 1971)
( 3) All other peraitt d principal uses ......•.•. 15 feet
m. ~lnimum rear yard.
All p rmtt ('d prt ndp l ~~~· ..................... 25 feet
n. L:ins .
hy Ord. No. lA, Series of 1971)
..
• •
-
. :
..
•
•
I• -
~' ( '\ (
o. Accessory buildings and permitted accessory uses.
(In addi ti on to th e follow~ng, see Supplementary
Regulatt'J:"!S )
(1) Private gara~es 3nd carports. Private garages
and carports designed cr used for the storage
or shelter of vehicles owned or operated by
the occupants of the principal building;
howev~r, commercial vehicles shall be limited
to three-quarter (3/4) ton carrying capacity.
{a) Maximum height --1-1/Z story .••....... lS feet
.(b) Minimum front yard, see Supplementary
Regulations.
(c) S .~de yard.... . . . . . . . . . • • . . • . • . . . • . . . . • . 3 feet
if detached and on rear one-third (1/3)
of lot.
(d) Rear yard --if enter from front or
side. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • . . . • . . . . • . • • • . 3 feet
If entering from ailey •.....••......••. 6 feet
(2) Home occupations. Occupations customarily
incident to the principal use AS a residence
(not to include barhcrs, hairdressers, cos-•
metologists, beauticians) when conducted in
the same dwelling provided that :
(a) I~ is ope r ated jn its entriety within the
dl.-elling unit and only by the person or
person :: m::~intaining a dwelling unit therein.
(b) No assistants arc employed.
(c) The hours ar.d the manner of such use and
th~ nois~s crea c d thereby are not such
as to int~rfcte ~i th the peace, quiet or
cignity of th~ n~ighborhood and adjoining
p~opert.les.
(d) Thdre shall he no advertising excep as
?~rm1 tc~ heroin.
( ) J:l ,,ffh I) u-in.s!: cinco; not have-•~
( ) The o!fic': or bwintss doe not utiliz:e
~ore than t nt~ (20) per ent of th
roc;s flllot· a Ln th dwellin unit,
bu Ln ~u _ P 'CJit, no t nore than thre
h : .. mdr u ' C' •1U r~ t>t; provided,
O'-"' r, tt, th, do not apply to
f t'l <: .f• r • m 1 ' ~ r, r c-.
. . ... ..
•
t
]-
r:-, 1 .• ·
·.
.·
•
•
•
I•
•
'·' ( (~. (
(g) The u~e of electric motors is limited
for power, with a total limitation of three
(3) hor s epower and nc single uGit over one
and one-half Jl -1/Z) hors ~p cwer.
p. Other provis ions and req•!i rement~.
(1) No structure or vehicle on the same lot with
the principal dwelling sha ll be used for resi-
dence purposes.
(2) Two units must have at least one party wall and
·a co:r.mon roof.
(3) No u s e shall be p~rmjtted within the District
wh ich, by emitting an obnoxious or dangerous
degree of heat, glare, odor, radiation, or
·fumes or undue or excessive noise beyond any
boundar y line of the lot upon which the use
is located, would ccccme a nuisance to other
validly existing uses in the area.
,.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first
reading on the ith day of July, 1975.
Publis~ed as a Bill for an .Ordinance on the
lOth day of July, 197 5.
Read by title and passed on final reading on
the 4th day of August, 1975.
Publi ~h d bv title as Ordinance No. ~0
Serle of 1975, c .• t e ·7th c!ay of .\u u .t. 19 5.
'
•.•
• •
t
•
•
I •
•
( (
ATTEST :
I, William C. l a~es. do herehy c ertify that
the above and f oregoi~g is ~ true , accurate and complete
copy of th~ Or din3nca , pa s s &d on £inal reading and
published by t itle a~ Ord ir:-l!lr; Nc . .3o , Series o f
1975. ---
• •
-•
0 -
(\
MEM ORANDUM
TO : Acting City Manage~· Karl Nollenberger
FRm.f: D. A. Romans, Acting Director of Community Development
DATE; October 2, 1975
At the time the City Planning and Zoning Commission considered
the Weaver/Wiebe application to rezone the area south of West
Union Avenue and east of South Decatur Street from R-1-C,
Single-family Residence to R-2-B, Two-family Residence, the
consideration of the repeal of the R-2-B Zone District was
underway; but final action had not yet been taken. At that
time, we had no way of being sure that the proposed R-2 and
R-3 Ordinances would be-passed by the City Council, and the
applicants did not want to wait until the Council took final
a ctio n on the ordinances, either approving or disapproving
th em , b efore we proceeded with the application.
As the e v e n ts worked out, the R-2 and R-3 Ord i nances proceeded
mo re rapi dly than the rezoning case and by the time the City
Council c o u ld have h e ld a Public Hearing on the Weaver/Wiebe
applic a t i on, the R-2-B Zone District was repealed by Ordinance
No. 30, S e r ies of 1975. City Attorney Berardini gave the
op inio n tha t the C i ty Council could not proceed with the
Hearing on the a pplication, inasmuch as the classification
which was b ein g s oug ht no long er ex i sted.
Th is ma t ter h as b een discussed with the City Attorney and the
Pl anni n g Comm i sion, a nd it i s agreed that we, the City
b odi ar obl iga t e d to comp lete th cons i deration of the
A
w
n
applic t i o n , ina much as th a pplicant had no control
action tak n by t h City . Th P l a n n i ng Comm ission
nd tb approval of the r zoning to th City Council .
cone rn d have b n notifi d of the circum that th y 111 b advi d 0 th procedur d.
ue .
lr.
r· ' Mr.
Au u 2 , 1 7 ' r.
•
,
(
(
I '
•
•
STAFF REPOR~
Page -1-
S taf f Report Re:
•
•
(
• REZONING REQUEST
Case #3-76
The rezoning of approximately 4-1/2 acres from
R-1-C Single-family Residence District to R-2, Medium Density Residence District.
Date to be Considered:
January 20, 1976
Name and Address of Applicant:
B. L. & Wannita R. Weaver
2714 West Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Mr. and .Mrs. Weaver are represented in this case by
John A. Criswell, Attorney-at-Law, 3780 South Broadway, Englewood, Colorado 80110.
Names and Addresses of Property Owners:
The County Assessor's records show the following as
owners of the properties in the area requested for rezoning ;
B. L. & Wannita R. Weaver
2714 West Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Maye M. Ferguson
2740 West Union Avenue
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Relation of Applicant to Reque t :
B. L. & Wannitta W av r a r property own rs and re ide
in th ar a r q u e ted for r z o ni n •
Location or Addrc
Th a r en outhwe t EnGl wood, to th outh o! C nt ct or a 1 bound d on th w by South by w t Union AVPDU on th I right-o!-w y hich would South th outh by ingl -family hom
wh ch ar u e d agricul t ura lly.
'
• •
.......
(
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -2-
1
Zone District:
•
( • ~ REZONING REQUEST
Case #3-76
The subject property is now zoned R-1-C, Single-family
Residence. The land to the north and east is zoned I-1, Light
Industrial; to the south, the land is zoned R-1-C, Single-family
Residence, and to the west of South Decatur Street, the land
is zoned R-1-B, Single-family Residence. Both R-1-B and R-1-C
are single-family residence districts; The R-1-B District
requires a minimum of 60 foot frontage, a minimum lot area of
7,200 square feet, and a minimum floor area of 1,000 square
feet. The R-1-C District requires a minimum of 50 foot of
frontage, a minimum lot area of 6,000 s~uare feet, and a
minimum floor area of 850 square feet.
Description of Request:
The applicant is requesting that the subject properties
be zoned from R-1-C, Single-f amily Residence, to R-2, Medium
Density Residence.
With industrial zoning to the north and east, the
applicant is of the opinion that additional development of
these properties cannot take place under the R-1-C zoning;
hence, the request for the R-2 tedium Density Residence
zoning. Both properties have been on the market and both
owners have been told by real estate agents that they cannot
sell the land under the existing zoning~ The applicant feels
that " •.••. rezoning of these parcels to R-2 Medium Density
Residential would create an ideal buffer zone bet•een the
existing single-family and industrial zoning to the north and
south of the subject property, and to the ea t and west of the
subject property. This would also be contiguous and coaplementary
to the park to the north of Union Av nu •
Rccomm ndation from the Department of Community Developaent:
(
(
STAFF REPORT
Page -3-
•
0
•
REZONING REQUEST
Case #3-76
This recommendation is based on the findings that: ,
1. Be cause of its proximity to industrial areas, and
b e cause of the a g ricultural nature of the development within
th e subject area, the Single-family Residence zoning may not
have been the correct initial zoning.
2. The City has zoned an area north of West Union
Av e nue and west of South Decatur Street for High Density Resi-
dence use, causing a change in the area.
3. The properties within the subject area are not
developing under the R-1-C Zone District, because of the
proximity to industrially zoned areas.
4. The area proposed for rezoning is more than "one
(1) City block in area", and therefore, complies with a policy
previously e s tablished by the C i ty.
5. Th e proposed medium-density zoning would not be in
conflict wi th the Comprehensive Plan.
6. The max i mum possible density permitted in the R-2
Zone Di strict could be accommodated by those facilities most
directly affect e d, such as util i ties and police and fire
s ervices.
7. There are commercial, educational and recreational
facilities within the immediate area that could meet those
n ee ds of the additional population that may come about because
o f the rez oning.
Description o f Subj e ct S i t e o r Area and the Adjacent Area :
The a r ea s u r rounding th s ubj ct s i te ha s a mi xture
of u ses. To~e wet is t h C n t e nnial Ac res Subdiv is on, wh i ch
i zone d R-1-B, Single-fami l y R idenc and c ompletel y dev e lop d.
C ntennial Park, w th 3 .45 ncr d evelop d and 37.55 acres un-
d v lop d, i to th north cro t Union Avenue. Adjacent
to C nt nninl Park on th w t, is n und v lop d 2 .3 nero s
7.on d R-3, High n ity R idenc • Th it a ' zon d by
Ordinanc No. 52, S .ri of 1975,
own r
to the
th r
urth r
'.
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -4-
•
•
l
REZONING REQUEST
Case #3-76
South o f th e subject site are several large parcels of
land which are also zoned R-1-C. These properties are
occupied by agricult~ral and r e sidential uses.
Access to the area is by way of South Decatur Street
which delimits the area on the west, West Union Avenue which
delimits the area on the north, and a partial right-of-way
along what would be South Clay Street extended on the east.
West Union Avenue has been designated as a Collector Street
in the Master Street Plan. Along the east boundary of the
Weaver property, there is the 16-foot right-of-way which
provides limited access to properties further to the south
of the Weaver property via a private lane. There is no internal
circulation within the subject area at this time. This area
is not subdivided, and before any development takes place
within the area, plats will have to be approved and access
will have to be provided.
The area itself is very flat and open and is presently
occupied by the single-family homes of the two owners.
The flood of 1965 reached much of this area, as well
as much of Centennial Acres to the west. The 1965 flood was
a Standard Project Flood as defined by the Army Corps of
Engi neers, which is of a much greater magnitude than the 100-
y ear flood, the flood covered by the Flood Plain Ordinance.
According the Army Corps of Engineers study done in 1963,
this area is well outside the predicted ext e nt of the 100-
y ear flood area. With the completion o f Chatfield Dam since
the 1963 Corps study, the extent o f the 100-year flood has
been diminished even further .
Background of Previous City Ac tion Re l ating to the Prop rty:
This area wa part of a 30.2 acr are annex d to the
City of Englewood by Ordinance No. 16 of 1961. At that tim ,
it was the City policy upon annexation that th annexed r a
wa simultaneously zoned R-1-A, Singl -f ily R idenc • This
was th mo t r trictive zone cla ific tion and w impo d
on all ann x d 1 nd to s rv as • "holding zone" un 11 a prop r
zoning for th area could b d termin d. Th Court h v inc
di couraged this pr~ctic , and municip liti ar iv n 90 days
following n ann xation to zone th nr a to n ppropriat zon
cltls ification •
'
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -5-
•
•
-
l ·.
REZONING REQUEST
Case #3-76
In 1963, the subject area was rezoned to R-1-C, its
present zoning, as part of the adoption of the 1963 Comprehen-
sive Zoning Ord inance and Map.
I
Periodic..tlly over til .. ~ .:ars , diffo1·ent persons have
contacted the Planning Division about the possibility of re-
zoning this area, or portions of the area south of West Union
Avenue and west of South Clay Street extended. They have been
advised to meet with other property owners in the area in an
attempt to come to some agreement as to the zoning in the
area.
The property owners in the area south of West Union
Avenue and between South Decatur Street and the South Platte
River, were invited to attend the April 16, 1974, meeting of
,. .
the Planning Commission to discuss a traffic circulation pattern
for this area. It was hoped that the concensus of that meeting
would produce a traffic circulation pattern that could be
proposed as an amendment to the Master Street Plan. However,
the concensus of those property owners at that meeting was that
the need for consideration of a circulation pattern or street
system within the area was premature. Also at that meeting,
Mrs. Maye Ferguson expressed a desire to rezone her property
and, hopefully, some neighboring properties in order to improve
the development potential of the land.
On May 14, 1974, Mrs. Ferguson, !drs. Weaver, and
Mr. Henry Feistner arranged for a meeting with Mrs. Romans
and Mr. House of the Planning Staff, to discuss the possibility
of rezoning this area to R-2-B, Two-family Residence. The
density permitted in the R-2-B Zone District was felt by Mrs.
Ferguson, Mrs. Weaver and Mr. Feistner to be compatible with
the surrounding area and, at the same time, would permit a
more feasib le use of their land in view of the industrial
zoning to the east and north. Th e need for access into that
ar a, if it were to be d v loped, was d iscussed. During the
me ting, Mrs. Ferguson, Mrs. Weaver, and Mr . Feistner agre d
that they would talk with other property owners in the R-1-C
Zone District to ee wh ther or not they would join a formal
applic tion for a rezoning. At th t tim , th y f lt that
mo t of he oth r property own rs would be agr bl to th
r zoning. A ta 1 r port, C #13-74, was pr • nted to the
Commis ion on Jun 4, 1974, a a follow-up to th t m ting.
No Commission ction w s tak n on the r port.
'
•
'
-
(
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -6-
•
0 -I•
l ·,
REZONING REQUEST
Case #3-76
no agreement to purchase between the applicant, Mr. Wiebe, and
any of the property owners. Because of this, the Commission
was advised by Assistant City Attorney Lee that the Public
Hearing should be closed. Mr. Lee further advised that until
such time as a valid application for rezoning were made --an
application filed by a property owner within the area, or a
person holding an option to purchase property within the area
the rezoning should not be considered. It was suggested by the
Commission that one or more of the property owners in this
area should sign the application for rezoning, and that it be
resubmitted. The Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance does not re-
quire at this time, that any specific number of owners or
persons who have options to purchase land within an area pro-
posed to be rezoned sign the rezoning application. One person
may request zoning for land other than the land in which be may
have an interest.
The request for the rezoning of the entire area south
of West Union Avenue and east of South Decatur street, which
is zoned R-1-C, was resubmitted by Mr. and Mrs. Weaver to the
Planning and Zoning Commission on June 17, 1975. Before con-
sideration of this request could be completed by both the City
Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, action
was underway to repeal the R-2-B Zone District, and enact in-
stead, the new R-2, Medium Density Zone District.
On the advice of the City Attorney, •tr. and Mrs. Weaver
were advised to delay further action on the rezoning request
until the new R-2, Medium Density Residence District was adopted.
The R-2-B Zone District wa subsequently repealed by City
Council and tbe new R-2 Zone District was adopted December 16,
1975.
B. L. and Wannita Weaver are now reque ting R-2,
Medium Den ity Residential zoning only for their property and
that of their neighbor, r.tay Ferguson; not for th entire area
that was considered previously. The proper posting of the
area and notice in th official City new paper have be n mad
in pr p ration for the Public H aring to b h ld on January
20, 1976.
ugg
Comm
Plan:
Pl n of tb Comprehensiv Plan
ntial u for thi r a.
Thi o ic would hav no
ch ng
•
(
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -7-
•
..
• \
REZONING REQUEST
Case #3-76
Public Service Company -Electric Division: No
objection.
Department of Utilities: The area in question, adjacent
to South Decatur, is accessible to water service, but not to
gravity sewer service.
Water service is available in West Union and on South
Decatur.
The area is in the Valley Sanitation District and
service to additional development in the area would necessitate
negotiating with the sanitation district.
The alternative to septic tanks is to carry sewage
easterly to the 66" interceptor that Littleton and Englewood
intend to construct on the east side of the South Platte River.
Valley Sanitation District -Rea, Cassens & Associates,
Inc., Consulting Engineers: Mr. Cassens advised that the
Valley Sanitation District sewage line is nearly used to
capacity now. When the R-3 zoned area north of West Union
Avenue and adjacent to Centennial Park was being considered
for development into a 50-unit multi-family use, Mr. Cassens
felt that the additional sewage load created by that develop-
ment would just about fill the Valley sewer line to capacity.
The area zoned R-3 has not been developed. It gets down to
the fact that Valley Sanitation could accommodate the sewage
from fifty additional units in this area and that the first
application submitted for service will probably g t it --the
first-come first-rved principle.
Nr. Cassens feels that on alternativ to serve n w
dev lopment in th subject area could b to carry the sewag
ast to the Littl ton/Engl wood int rceptor which will li on
sid of th South Platt R v r. Th will b a v ry
how ver, and ould becoa or f a ibl
D strict than uod r th pr nt zone cl 1-
(
(
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -8-
<'
•
-
•
REZONING REQUEST
Case #3-76
their properties if a buyer were available, and have had their
property listed for sale. One owner has been told the price
that they felt necessary to receive for their land was too
high for single-family land in that location. It appears then,
that development of the area into single-family lots of 6,000
s~. ft. may not be practical, especially when considering the
inhibitive financial climate prevailing at the present time.
The development of this generally open land, however, could
possibly become attractive if the permitted density were in-
creased slightly, as would be the case if it were rezoned to
R-2, as requested.
The maximum obtainable density under the proposed R-2
zoning would be approximately fourteen (14) dwelling units per
net acre. No more than four units could be attached and under
a common roof under the provisions of the R-2 Zone District.
Under the present R-1-C zoning, approximately seven (7) dwelling
units per net acre would be permitted. The area requested for
rezoning is approximately 4-1/:.! acres.
Inasmuch as the area is not platted, it will be necessary
to subdivide the area before any development takes place. Access
will have to be provided within the area and, as a rule of thumb,
approximately 25% of the land in a development is devoted to
rights-of-way. With this in mind, we could assume, not knowing
how the ar a will be laid out, that there will be approximately
3.5 acres for development and one (1) acre devoted to rights-
of-way.
Because several of the owners in the
south of W st Union Avenue and east of South
do not want to s 11 or develop
on South
nee th
ron tin
r" b tw n
t ot South
to th
•
•
DENVER
(Resid en tia I)
•
•
B-2
Business
----$ n -=-ji'w " -···------.)
~'i c init).{~ Map . u.,
z t
l.........___
.,·f-!.tl· l .,)-;;, ......
j ........ --.. ··-·,+--------
,,
•: '·
We aver Reque st for 1-<e;--..,ing
R-1-C to R-2
-...... _
"''
01"' ...
o• o"'
Anne xed Area
"'·
~ ~~~~
~
c
..J
o. Hll i,
N .. ~ ~
·'I I 1 Et!GLEW,OQ~ kru .--JI...-....... _
I
LITTLETON
-csusin~sr n~us:rlall-
,
o""./Z , .,z~_Y/
~,j ~'/
@: ¥,r -~.
pf '
?' . I scale ,.,400 ,
I
r I •
....
'" \
I
~
•
' .
r--o
...
~
0 I j
•
•
;
I= 12 J I I I l1 =1~ ;\: · \ -Weaver ReQuest for Rezonmg L-~~ I .. .. ;J •o ~--· ~'""' __ Ar~a __ ty1@__J!-.t.~_12_~~----· _ __
l
I
~ [ ... 0.
,: 9
~~
.
~
,
1:··:
; 10
8'
~-
fD #
• 0 0
9
-
-10
VI
LJ !:.
•00
; 8
)-
::>
0
i 9
:!.
en o ...
90
100
~ e
:::.
:
~'
W. TANrORAN DR .
,_,
R-.1 -~
Si hgl~ _Fc mily
i So I
w. L.:AYTON AVE .
1 ~
·.""
u ·
w SARATOGA AVE -
80 a•
•. -· '"'
to ..
W. CHENANGO AVE.
i •.• J
; I -.. , .,,, ..
H "''
IO .• 1 .1 • -I ;
"' .. \)
~
18 ;I
10 .. , . .a
~
~ l > •i) t i
I ;
~ ~ '-1
u•u ... ,, ~I'
U SJIH
&4J
0
!
18 ~
fl ..... ,
......
I !
16 ;
u .•l
~
. . .
l: ...
::>
0
(I)
[]
l 1 '· •
R-1-C
Single Family O
Res id en ti al
ll I I I I I ll ltf.t
••
AVE .
IU
0 0
Porr ...
I-1
Ambler
Parr
Light Industrial
ll
;o
Bunord
stria!
a,, 1 -----·-----
: ..
I•>
D
Co11fie ld
;Po ..
.
I
I
I
--....:.":;.;...'---~-
U I
c::::J
sco re 1"=200
Deportment of Commun it y Oeve loDmen .. •
1-
•
•
0 -
• •
ANALYSIS OF "SPOT ZOlUNG" PRINCIPLES
Undersinged counsel entertains the view that a detailed dis-
cussion of legal issues before either the Planning Commission or
the City Council is generally inappropriate. However, in this
particular instance, since some question has been raised whether
the approval of the application here involved would constitute
"spot zoning", it would appear that at least some consideration
must be given to that principle in passing upon this application,
particularly in light of recent Colorado Supreme Court decisions.
To begin with, Counci l should be clearly aware of the function
which, under the law, Council performs in passing upon any ap li-
cation for rezoning. In the recent case of Snyder v. City of
Lakewood, The Colorado Lawyer, Vol. 4, No. 12, December, 1975,
2420, decided on October 20 , 1975, that Court held that, in passing
upon a request for re-zoning, the members of Council do not act
as legislators; rather, they perform a "quasi-judicial" function,
i.e. they act as "judges", and that the are required to apply
"the statutory criteria [for re-zoning] to the evidence presented
[in the hearing]," supra, p. 2423.
This means, in our opinion that:
1. Council must base its decision solely u on the informa-
tion and evid nee-presented during the hearings , and cannot r ly
upon matt rs not covered th .r by; and
2. If th information and vidence rec ived shows that th
"crit ria" for a chang in zoning hav been met, a refusal to re-
zone may well constitute ad nial of the landowner's l gal rights;
and
3. No council m mber
re-zoning chang if he has
mind.
in judgm nt upon a proposed
~~~~~rm~i~n~e~d~ the matt r in his own
Und r
zoning is
c onv ni nc
p r ctic • "
th Colorado atatut
ppropri when ju
, h lth, morals, g
122.301, Ordinanc
dth
d.
• •
]-
•
0
•
•
changed since the land was originally zoned. Huneke v. Glaspy,
155 Colo. 593, 396 P2d 453 (1964). See, also, u.s. v. Smith,
154 Colo. 209, 389 P2d 409 (1964).
It is within the context of these general principles, then,
that the concept of "spot zoning" must be considered.
The term, itself, is somewhat misleading because it r eally
has no reference to the size of the area involved, although the
term-.rspot" implies thatSIZe has some relevance . Rather, the
simplest definition of "spot zoning" is:
Dasically, t h n, "s ot zoning" occurs when a zoning am nd-
I. ent is auop ted which is not consistent with the compr hensive
plan, and not for th public good, but serves only the privat
inter sts of t1 prop rty own r. s Clark v. City of Bould r,
146 Colo. 526, 362 P2d 160 (1961). So long as t~ zon1ng amend-
m nt is consist nt with th comprehensive plan, the amendment does
not constitut "spot zoning", irrcsp ctive of the size o the par-
cel involvcu.
In this ca , th n , there can no claim that approval of this
a pp lication would cons itut "spot zoning" for at least the follow-
ing r aeons;
1. Th original inclusion of t . is ground in th R-1 district
was oLviou ly a l~gal mistak . On no less than thre occasions,
uiff r nt Pl nning Commissions hav r commended t~Y Council
that this d signation b chang d. Ther exists wit in th r cord
b for this Council no an iota of cvid~nce or inform tion which would
support th conclusion th t-rhis area is ro cr~y zon d at h
p r s nt tim
3. 'i hin h p a y r, Council h 1 giv n tt c 0 th as r
-2-
•.
• •
t
•
•
0
•
( '
Plan for this area by re-zoning an area directly to the northwest
of this property for multiple-family uses.
4. Good planning practices incorporate the concept of main-
taining a "buffer" of medium density residential uses between in-
compatible industrial and single-family uses. Approval of this
application would serve that public purpose, among others.
Based upon the facts presented to this City Council, then ,
it is quite apparent to the undersigned that this application for
re-zoning p r esents no issue with respect to any claim of "spot
zoning".
-J-
'"l"?ir:··_~,~:
Cris~
RISWELL , PATTERS ON
& BALLANTINE
•.
• •
f
•
•
•
0 -
(
(
CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO
IN THE MATTER OF CAfE NO. 3-76, )
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, )
AND RECO~~ENDATIONS RELATING TO )
THE PLACING OF CERTAIN AREAS OF )
THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD IN AN R-2 )
ZONE DISTRICT, PURSUANT TO )
§22.3-2 OF THE COMPREHENSIVE )
ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF )
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO. )
A public hearing was held in connection with Case No. 3-76,
on January 20, 1976, in the Council Chambers at the Englewood
City Hall. The following members of the Commission were present :
Mr. Brown, Mr. Jones, Mr. Jorgenson, J.lr. Smith, Mr. Tanguma,
Mrs. Wade and Mr. Williams.
The fol lowing members of the Commission were absent: Mr. Parker
and Mrs. Pierson.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Upon r view of the evidence t~ken in the fora of testiaony,
pr ntations, reports and fil d documents, the Commis ion makes
th follo in findings of fact:
That prop r notice of th m eting to con ider th propo ed
zonin wa iv n by posting and publishing.
Th ar a in qu stion i crib d as: B ginning at th
int r ction of the a t lin th W l/2 E l/2 of S ction 8
T 5 S, R 8 W of the 6th P. l. and th centerline of th W t
Un1on Avenu right-of-way; thenc w st along said cent rlin
43 5 t. +1 -to the c ntcrlin of South Decatur Str et; th nc
outh t rly alon aid c nt rlin 506 ft. +I-; th nc a t
501.4 ft. 1-to a point on th a t lin of theW l/2 E l/2
d S ction ; th nc north alon aid a t lin 503.14 t.
1 -to point of bt•g innin .
Th t th ar a
R id nc an th t
r of 1063.
a now zon d R-1-C, Sin
o zon d y Ordinanc
aily
,_
•
-
•
( r
•
0 -
,._
-2-
That the land to the north and east of the area with which
this application is concerned, is zoned I-1, Light Industrial;
the land to the south is zoned R-1-C, Single-family Residence,
and to the west, the land is zoned R-1-B, Single-family Residence.
That the land included in the application, excluding the
public rights-of-way, is approximately 4,3 acres and is divided
into two parcels. One parcel of approximately 1.889 acres is
owned by Mr. and Mrs. B. L. Weaver, and the remaining land is
owned by Mrs. Maye Ferguson.
That the land which is the subject of this application has
not been platted and that before development takes place, it
will have to be subdivided in accordance with the Subdivision
Regulations, Title XII, Chapter 3, of the '69 E.M.C., as amended.
That there is one single-family house on each of the two
parcels, occupied by the respective owners.
That both properties have been on the market and the
owners of both parcels have been told by real estate agents
that they could not sell the land as it is presently zoned.
That the area is bounded on the north by West Union Avenue,
on the east by a 16 foot right-of-way, which would be an extension
of South Clay Street which runs for the depth of the property
or 473.14 f et, and on the west by South Decatur Street. There
is no public access to the subject property from the south.
That the Centennial Park is to the north of West Union
Avcnu ; to th ast there is industrial development; to the
outh th r ar singl -family residences on one-half acre or
larg r tract , with u es of an agricultural natur interaix d
and to t of South Decatur Street, there are sin 1 -
family
That th land with which this application is cone rned is
th only land in that imm diat area which is bounded on two
side by land zoned for indu trial use.
Th
City zon
t of Sou
Ordinanc
land north of W st Union
t, R-3, Hi h Den ity
n tonin p
of 1975.
Diatrict p raita
ite ith a minimua
rootage of SO t.
rmi 1 _ r
-
•
•
•
•
0 I•
•
•
-flexible zone classification to be imposed on land situated,
as the subject property is, between industrial zoning on the
north and east, and single-family residence zoning to the
south and west, thus serving as a "buffer"* between the unlike zones.
That the Gene ra lized Land Use Map in the Comprehensive
Plan, projects the development of this land at a medium density.
That on two previous occasions, the Planning Commission
has recommended to the City Council that the R-1-C, Single-family
Residence zoning was not proper as applied to the subject property.
That the R-2. Medium Density, will conserve and stabilize
the value of property, secure safety from fire and other danger,
prevent undue concentration of population, md will promote the
health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the public in accordance with a comprehensive plan.
CONCLUSIONS
That proptJ public notice of the public hearing was given
by both posting the property and publishing in the official City Newspaper.
That the present zoning is R-1-C, Single-family Residence,
and that in two previous instances, the City Planning and Zoning
Commission has determined that as applied to this property, that zone classification is not proper.
That the property which is the subject of th application
is bound d on the north and east by land which is zoned for
industrial use, which industrial zoning is not compatible
with nor conducive to single-family residence development.
Th t were th subj ct property to be r zoned requested,
it would then s rve a a "buffer" betwe n th indu trially zoned
areas to the north and ast and the single-family zoned areas
to th outh and w st. That th owners of the subj ct land
hav tried to 11 that land on the open mark t and h v b en
unabl to do it 1 pr ently zoned,
Th t
Colora o,
u of th
int rpr
pt· ct on d to b
typ a trip or
oi land ue
nt.
•
1
(
•
•
•
0 t•
•
-4-
That the zone classification of R-2, Medium-Density
Residence, will continue to conserve and stabilize the value
of property, secure safety from fire ~nd other danger, prevent
unjue concentration of population and traffic and to promote th~ health, safety, morals and the ge neral ~clfare of the
public in 11ccordance with a comprehensive plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Therefore, it is the recommendation of the City Planning
and Zoning Commission of the City of Englewood, Colorado, to
the City Council of the City of Englewood, that the above
described property to be zoned R-2, Medium Density Residence,
the zone classification adopted by Ordinance No. 30, Series of 1975.
Upon vote at a meeting of the Commission on January 20, 1976.
Those memb ~rs of the Pla~niQg Commission voting in favor:
Mr. Brown, Mr. Jones, Mr. Jorgenson, Mr. Smith, Mr. Tanguma,
Mrs. Wade and Mr. Williams .
Those members of the Planning Commission voting against
the motion: None.
Those members o l the Planning Commission who were absent:
Mr. Parker and Mrs. P1crson.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY PLANNING
AND ZONING CO t.IMJ SSIO
Edd1e Tanguma',
Vic <!-Chairma n
...
Jr.
• •
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD
-----
• (lut>fl tlt)
......
•
•
GENERALIZED LAND USE
1970
•
PoPULATION 8 LAND USE
In 1903 , th e year of En g lewood's
1 n c orpo r ation, th e City's popula-
t i on wa s approximately 2,000.
Gro wth was low and fairly steady
u nt i l a fte r World War II; then,
during the post-war years, the
g rowth rate skyrocketed. The rate
has now lowed somewhat, although
it i s t i ll at a high level, and
present trends indicate population
growth from 1960 to 1980 will prob-
ably equal that from 1950 to 1960.
A portion of the City's future pop-
ulation growth will be a result of
con tru tion in the dwindling un-
deve lop d areas, but most of this
growth will result from redevelop-
ment in olde r areas. Much of this
red v lopment, particularly in the
area adj acent to the c ntral busi-
nes s d i tri t , and in the vicinity
of th ho p i tal complex, will be
hrough th renovation of older
i n 1 -f amil resid nee to new
m dium and high den ity multi-
GLEWOOD POPULATION
t----ACTUAL ----+-PRO.IECT EO --i
2000 !lili!ili~~~~~~~~~~~'l 1990
1910
19 7 0
1960
1950
1940
19l0
IUO
l tiO
11 00
--::
I
10 20 lO 40 &0 10
IN TH OU SANDS
0 -
traffic regulatory devices, will
continue to revitalize and stimu-
late new growth in the business
district. This new development is
anticipated to be in the form of
professional offices and service
facilities, low-income housing,
multi-family apartment complexes
and the convenience and specialty
shops to serve the residents and
employees within the area as well
as clients and customers who will
be drawn to the location. The pro-
posed multi-family development on
the former KLZ transmitter site
which is located one mile dir ctly
to the east of the central busines s
district, will particularly stimu-
late redevelopment of the corridor
between U.S. 285 and Floyd Avenue
and from South La f ayette Street
west to the central business dis-
trict. New development in the
western portion of the City adja-
cent to South Santa Fe Driv and
the railroad facilitie will be
primarily industrial and, though
important to Englewood' conomi c
base, will not add directly to the
population within the City.
aethod of for -
population of
•
•
0 , .
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCilMAN WILLIAMS
BY AUTI-IORITY
ORDINMCE NO._j_Q_, SERIES OF 1976
AN ORDINANCE REZO ING A CE nAIN PARCEL OF LAND Wl1lilN THE CITY OF
ENGLEW D, ARAPAHOE COUNTY, STATE OF COLORAOO, FRCM R-4 RESIDENTIAL -
PROFESSIONAL DISTRTCT, TO B-2 BUSINESS DISTRICT, AND AMEND! G THE
OFFICIAL ZONING ~VW ACCORDINGLY.
WHERFJ\5, pursuant to Section 22 .3 of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, a Public Hearing was held before the City Planninp, and
Zoning Commission on December 17, 1975 to rezone a certain parcel
of land within the city from R-4 Residential-Professional District
to B-2 Business District; and
1~. said Planning and Zoning Commission has considered
the prooosed amendment and map chan~e and has submitted its favor-
able rec0111nendation to the City Council therefor; and
h11ERfAS, pursuant to ct ; 1 22.3 of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinan e a Public Hearing was held before the City Council on
to rezone said parcel according to th above desig-
nation; and
I'.HCREAS, public necessity, conve nience, health, safety, the
general w lf~re and good zoning practice justify th proposed
nclmcnt to the said Offici 1 Zoning Map, as hereinafter set
orth.
, 1l!ER£FORE , BE IT ORDAIMD BY 1liE CITY C , IL OF 1liE Cln'
n, COLO , J\S FOLLO\'."':
l.
fh foil wing describ d prop rt .hall be r zoned r R-4
R iu n 1al ·Profc sional Di .tri t to B-2 Busine 01 trict:
-1 •
• •
,
]-
(
(
•
Section 2.
•
0 t•
•
with the centerline of We s t Ithaca
Avenue, thence west to the point of
beginning, all in Arapahoe County,
Colorado.
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Englewood, Colorado,
hereby is amended accordingly.
Introduced, read in full and passed on first reading on the
19th day of January, 1976.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the
1976.
day of January,
Read by title and passed on final reading on the 1st day of
March, 1976.
Published by title as Ordinance No. , Series of 1976, on
day of March, 1976. --the
ATil:.ST:
1, William 0. J
l
r ·Jin
MAYOR
bove and fore oing
p . J n final
of 197 •
•.
'
• •
-
(
•
0 I•
•
INTRODUCED AS A BILL BY COUNCIJ.MAN CLAYTON
BY AUltiORITY
ORDINANCE OO._jj_, SERIES OF 19 76
AN ORDINAl E REZ()II G A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND WITHI THE CITY OF
ENGLEW D, ARAPAI-DE COUNI'Y, STATE OF COLORAOO, FRCJ.1 R-3 HIQl DENSITY
RESIDEm'IAL ZONE DISTRICT, TO B-2 BUSINESS DISTRICT, AND AMENDING THE
OF FTC lAL ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY.
M1EREAS, pursuant to Section 22.3 of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, a Public Hearing was held before the City Planning and
Zoning Commission on December 17, 1975, to rezone a certain parcel
of land ~dthin the city from R-3 High Density Residential District
to B-2 Bustness District; and
~~. said Planning and Zoning Commission has considered the
proposed amendment and map change and has submitted its favorable
recommendation to the City Council therefor; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 22.3 of the Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance a Public Hearing was held before the City Council on
to rezone said par el, according to the above designation;
and
~HOREAS, public necessity, convenience, health, safety, the
general ~ lfnr and good zoning practice justify the proposed amend-
ment to th aid Official Zoni ng Map, as hereinafter set forth.
, TIIJJU..FORE, Bt; IT ORDAINED BY n CITY COONCIL OF THE CITY
l> , COLO FOLLO\' :
The f oll mg d cribed proper y h 11 be rezoned from R-3 High
ns1tv id n i 1 Di tric to B-2 Bu in Di trict:
• 1 •
,. .
,
(
(
•
Section 2.
•
0 -
extended south line of the north~ of Lot 11, Block 1,
Englewood, thence westerly along said line to a point
of its intersection with the centerline of the Delaware-
Ela ti alley , thence north along said centerline to a
point of its intersection with the extended north line
of Lot 7, Block 1, Englewood, thence easterly along
said line to the point of beginning, all in Arapahoe
Co unty, Colorado.
The Official Zoning Map of the City of Englewood , Colo rado, hereby
is amended accordingly.
Introduced, r ea d in full and pa ssed on first reading on the 19th day
of January, 1976.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the __ day of January, 1976.
Read by title and passed on fin~1 reading on the 1st day of March,
1976,
Published by title as Ordinance 'o. __ , Series of 1976, on th
day of March , 1976.
ATfEST:
i
in
•.
• •
-
•
•
P E T I T I 0 N
I (we) as owner(s) of the hereinafter described real property,
state that I have reviewed and am familiar with the application for
rezoning as filed with the C ity of Englewood, Colorado, by
William P. Van Heusen and P. E. Voorheis, Jr.;
1 concur with the matters set forth therein, and consent
to t :1e rezoning of my property to the H-2 zone district category
under the C ity of Englewood Zoning Ordinance; and, to the
extent permissible join in and with William P. Van Heusen
and P . ~. Voorheis, Jr. in their said rezoning application
and p etition the City Council of the City of E~glewood, Colorado,
to grant the rezoning therein requested.
Legal description of property: Lots 9 and 10, Block 1,
SKER RI 1'T' S ADDITIO:l, Arapahoe County, Colorado.
'oMmOn description of property : 35~ So. Delaware Street,
Cn q lewoo d, Colorad o, 8 0110, and parking lot utilized by new
~ngl ewood !tedical Arts Building.
;
;,
/. ,
./ ,!,"J (,!(!,
S ignature
S l.gnature
sign ture
,// I' ~-1--,D.La_,t-e-L---
Date
Date
'
•
-
(
•
•
0 : ... -
MINUTES
COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY21, 1976
DENVER REGIONA L COUNCIL Of GOVERNM ENTS
Present:
Norman A. Smith, Chairman
Ben Bezoff
Charles Bransford
Howard Brown
Verlin Bruns
Dennis Champine
Marjorie C hristian sen
Robert F. Clement
Don DeDecker
Genie deLuise
Mary DiLorenzo
George Drake
Doris Durdy
George Garson
Sam Harper
George Hovorka
Robert G. Howard
Beth Jenkins
Margare t Markey
Ga 11 Molinaro
James J. Nolan
Chari s A . Pitts
Mik Schonberg
Thomas G. Thorn
Wllll m Thornton
J rrold W. Todd
Sh ryl Weitz
Al o Pres nt:
C ity of Broomfield
City & County of Denver
City of Lafayette
City of Englew ood
City of Northglenn
City of Aurora
Commerce City
Jefferson County
City of Lakewood
City of Golden
C 1ty of Louisville
City of Edgewater
City of Brighton
City of Glend le
C ity of Littleton
C ity of Westminster
City of Wheat Ridge
Cherry Hills Village
Boulder County
Town of Morrison
City County of Denver
Arapa hot:> County
C ity c f Thornton
City of Arvad
Town of Bow Mar
City of h ridan
Centra! Ci y
,.~
3 a__
• •
-
•
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTE S
JANUARY 21, 1976
Page three
•
-••
Mr. DeDecker explained that the interim JRPP will b e composed of
seven members as opposed to the old JRPP consisting of the directors
of the three participating agencies. The DRCOG C ouncil will still
be the fina l policy body on JRPP actions. These sev e n members will
be called the "Reg10nal Direc or" of the JRPP. Th is group will also
have the responsibility to prepar a plan for the transfer of the Metro-
politan Planning Organization (MPO) designation to DRCOG
1
which is
something the DR COG Council ha be n attempting to accomplish for
almost a year s ince May, 1975, when the Council transmitted a letter
to the Governor asking for his consideration on the re-designation of
DRCOG as the MPO 1 r ather than h JRP as t now e xists. After six
weeks of negotiation 1 this inter! agr ment was developed and is
being submitted t o the thre e board f r adoption.
The Progra m Committee 1 this dat 1 on motion, una nimously recommended
that Council take the f ollowing action:
Upon r ecommendation of it subcommittee established to
discus s the question of DRCOG designation as Metropolitan
Planning Organization with other JRPP participants, it is
mov d that the Denver Regional Council o f Governments:
I. Endorses and ratifies 1 as an interim measure,
the proposed amendment to the Memorandum of
Agr eement o f June 28 1 1974, which provides for
policy repr esentation on th "R gional Director"
of th JRPP and creates a position of Ex ecutive
S crptary to th "R gional Dire or;"
2. Auth orizes lts Ex cutlv Dir ctor to e x cut e thi
proposed am ndm nt.
Mr. D D ck r th n introduc d third point for Council approval as a
whole 1 or discussion, follows:
,_
•.
• •
,
(
(
•
•
•
•
0
•
MINUTES
COUNCIL MEETING
JANUARY 21 , 1976
DENVER REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS
Pr esent:
Norma n A . Smith , Chairman
Be n Bezoff
Charles Bransford
How ard Br ow n
Ve rlin Bru n s
Dennis Champine
Marjorie Christians en
Robe rt F . Cle ment
Don De Decke r
Genie deLulse
Mary DILore nz o
George Drake
Doris Durdy
George Garson
Sam Harper
George Hovorka
Robert G • Howard
Beth Jenkin s
Margaret Mar ey
Gail M olina ro
James J. olan
Charl sA. Pitt
Mike Schonberg
Thoma s G. Thomas
William Thornton
Jerrold W. Todd
Sheryl Weltz
Also Pres nt:
City of Broomfield
City & County o f Denver
City o f Lafayette
City of Englewood
C ity of Northglenn
City of Aurora
Commerce City
Jefferson County
C ity of Lakewood
City of Golden
City of Loulsv11le
City of Edgewater
City of Brighton
City of Glendale
C tty of Li ttleton
City of Westminster
City of WhPat Ridg e
Charry Hills Village
BouldN County
Town of Morrison
City '-.. County of D nver
Arapahoe County
City of Thornton
City of Arvad
Town of Bow M r
City o Sh rldan
Centra! Cl y
3 a_
Pearl Alp rst In, Ro Cr g r, John 1uslc , D an S wanson , Ray
W lis; Ronald A. Oh m t , City ! yett ; John Morehead,
The Denv r Post; Jac l.. S rk a, olo . W st Are COG; K lls Waggoner I
City of Enol wood; rl Noll nb ro rl City of Enol wood; Jim H ck1
Comm rc City; G n Forti 1 J ff r n County Housing Authority; Gloria
a a ham 1 CAC: D v Rub! 1 CDH: John J. Dol n I CDH; Tom Tlch I CAC
Chairman; R y McNeill 1 M tro S wag District; D vidA. Viol tt , CH2M
Hill; R x low 11, CAC; Patrie! Th rab rg I M tro L& oue of Wom n Voters;
Rob rt D. r rl y 1 Ex cut1v Dtr ctor , DR COG; nd v rioua m mb re of
th DRCOG at If.
•
,
-
•
COUNCIL MINUTE S
JANUARY 21, 1976
Page two
•
0 -I•
Chairman Smith called th e meeting t o order at 7:35 p.m. Roll was called and
quorum declared present.
Minutes of December 3 , 1975 .
The Council, o n motion by Mr. Cleme nt , s upported
by Mr. Nolan, unanimously approved the minutes of
the December 3, 19 7 5 meeting a n mailed .
Summary of Ex ecutive Committee Meetings of Decemb e r 3 , 1975 and
January 7 , 1976 .
The Councll accepted the summ ary of th e Executive Committee meetings of
Decemb r 3 and )i3nuary 7 as malled.
Chairman Smith r por cd o n thl' NARC F der I Bri fing Session h eld in Wa shing ton ,
J nu ry 11-13 which h and Mr . far! y attended . Am ong is s ues and programs
1 cu. d at th session wer<> housing, tran sportation, health services, planning,
poilu ion, manpower and employment programs, e t c . Representatives of the
r d ral peratln a nci s s w ell as congr sslon I staffs we r e in attendance .
R
s.
'
0
•
f
(
(
•
C OUN CIL MINUTE S
JAN UARY 21 , 1976
Page three
•
•
..
Mr. DeDecker explained that the interim JRPP wtll be composed of
seven members as opposed to the old JRPP consisting of the directors
of the three participating agencies. The DRCOG Council will still
be the final policy body on JRPP actions. These se ven members will
be called the "Regional Director" of the JRPP. This grou p will also
have the responsibility to prepare a plan for the transfer of the Metro-
politan Planning Organization (MPO) des ignation to DRCOG, which is
something the DR COG Council has b ee n attempting to accomplish for
almost a year since May, 1975, when the Council transmitted a letter
to the Governor asking for his cons ideration on the re-designation of
DRCOG as the MP O , rather than the JRPP as it now exists. After six
w eeks of negotiation , this interim agreement was developed and is
being submitted to the three boards for adoption.
The Program Commi ttee , this date , o n motion, unanimously recommended
that Council take th e following action:
Upon recomme ndation of its subcommittee established to
discus s the question of DRCOG designation as Metropolitan
Planning Organization with other JRPP participants, it is
moved that the Denver Regional Council of Governments:
I. Endors es and ratifies , as an int rim measure,
the proposed amendment to the mo randum of
Agre ement o f Jun 28, 1974, which provid s for
policy repre ntation on the "R gional Director"
of th JRPP nd ere t position of Executive
S cret ry to th "R gl n 1 Dire o r ;"
2.
propo cuUve Dir ctor to execute this
Mr. D D cker th n introd uc d a third point for Counctl pproval as a
whelP, or discussion, a follow :
• .
• •
-
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 21, 19 76
Page four
•
0 -I •
Mr. Nolan explained that when these discussions first began several
months ago, the long range effort of those meetings was to change
the structure and get DRCOG designated as the MPO. RTD now feels
working out some of the technical details of that designation will take
time. RTD has indicated an intent to do this, as a short term measure,
to prevent pos sib1e decertification by the federal government, and also,
hopefully to show a feeling of intent to negotiate in good faith and
accomplish the designation of DRCOG as the MPO. DRCOG feels
strongly about being designated the MPO because the federal regulations
indicate that this is the way it's supposed to be. Last week in negotiations
it was agreed to go along with the interim agreement, but DRCOG intends
to continue in its pursuit of designation. Under the present agreement,
any member of DRCOG can give the other parties a 60 day notice to
terminate the program, which would mean there wouldn't be any Joint
Planning Program in this are . As a member of that group, Mr. Nolan
stated that if he didn't see good progress in th1s regard by May 1, 1976,
then he would re commend that the DRCOG Council pass a resolution
terminating the total program, 1r. olan disagreed with Mr. DeDecker's
sugges ed third point. H fplt it would not b an effort in good faith,
nd it may jeopardize the prOQr ss made to date . He felt termination
should be deferr d to May I st. Notice ha b n served to RTD that
tennina ion notice may be giv n a 11 future da c.
r. DE'D cker concurr d tha
firm in wan lng DRCOG d ig
n indicate that it is
d whether Mr. DeD cker
~rd pomt, or had he put it
d mo ion from the Program
'
• •
I
-
(
(
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 21, 1976
Page five
•
0
•
The Council , on motion by Mr. Todd, supported
by Ms. Weitz, adopted Points 1 and 2 as recom-
mended by th e Program Committee, and as stated
above. Question was called and the motion
carried unanim ously .
Mr. DeDecker then rroved to amend motion by
adding Point 3.
1'-
As a point of order, it was noted that under parliamentary procedure, a
motion cannot be amend ed once it has been voted on. It v.ould be
approptiate to move for reconsideration of the motion and amend it
under proper procedure.
Mr. DeDecke r wtthdrew his request.
Legislative Committee
Under attachment C of the agenda wer actions taken by the Legislative
Committee at its last two meetings. Among those, several were
specifically noted: The Committee reviewed th Regional Water District
Bill, drafted by the Legislature's Intenm Committee on Metropolitan
Denver Water, and heard extensive t estimony on the legislation. As
a result of that review, the Leglslativ Committee d cided the whole
question of creating a water district in ·his re~ion needed mere con-
sideration. Consequently, the Legislativ Comml tee took action
a king the Governor not to plac he bill on h call. A co y of the
letter sent to the Governor by he Counc I Chairman was distributed
o Council .
It was also the consensus of th Legir.l ive Committee that th subject
of metropolitan water should be brough b f r he ull Council at its
next regular m etlng as a problem, si 11 r o oUd waste, which could
b st be addres cd by local governments throu h th DRCOG.
Wi h r g rd t oR source R covery, th gialatlv Com mitte adopt d a
motion to refer the propos d Me ropol t n D nv r Solid W at BUl to th
full Council tor final ctlon with "strong recommend Uon for suppor ".
Th L gislativ Commttt r c mm nd am ndm nts to the bill which
would designat th Bo rd of County C mmi loners in ach county as
the ppolnting uthority ins ad of th overnor for those directors who
re xecuuv ot!ic rs of munlcip lltl s within th ir reap ctive countl a. • •
I
-
•
•
• ,. .
0 :. -
COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 21, 1976
Page six
R
Mr. Bruns, Northglenn, and Mr. Hovorka, Westminster, both reported
that their respective city councils who had previously expressed formal
opposition to the legislation, were now in favor of the bill. Both city
councils needed additional time to study the legislation and since that
time are in favor of its submission.
The Council, on motion by Mrs. Christiansen,
supported by Mr. Bruns, moved that the DRCOG
Council support the proposed Resource Recovery
legis l<ltion as endorsed by the DR COG Leg is lative
Committ ee . The motion carried with Mr. Pitts and
Mr!". Durdy voting no.
Mr. Champine, as a member of th Legislative Committe e , requested that
the Program Committ~"P ta e up discussion on the issue of water district
legislation. Ch uman Smith directed the L gislativ Committee to make
a formal r qu st nf the Progr m Committee, wlth mor detailed information
on what s cific he Progr11m Committe c;hould b requested to review.
Citizens Advisory Commit e
tt nll n
ed
• •
-
JANUARY 21, 1976
Page seven
•
0
•
Presentation to Council on Land Application Alternative for Water Quality
Treatment Processes. (Congressma n Wirth's grou p)
" .
Mrs. Pearl Alperstein, representative of Congressman Wirth's office, and
Messrs. McGregor, Musick, Swanson, and Wells, appeared before the Council
to urge that water quality management planning should not overlook the alternative
of land application of sewage treatment wastes. Land application is one of the
alternatives which are includ ed in the DRCOG Regional Clean Water (208) Study
which has been underway since early last year. A 15 minute film on the subject
was shown to Council.
1980 Functiona 1 CIa ssification.
A. Mail Ballot Results
The full Council, on 12-13-75 directed that a mail ballot be taken on
the 1980 Urban Boundary, Functional Classification , and Connecting
Link Designation. Council mriT'bers were requested to vote on these
issues through adoption of, deferra 1 of, or comment on, the Resolution
mailed. As of this date, th official results of that mail vote were:
36 ballots were mailed, 22 returned, with 9 voting to
adopt resolution, 12 voting to defer resolution, and
1 voting to return o the JRPP agency directors with
comment.
B. Furth
Ch trman, r ported th t th committe
s thl d nd mo t of he cone ms
equently, the PrOQr m
r solution.
'
• •
-
COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 21, 1976
Page e ight
•
-
The Council on J'l'loti o n by Mr. DeDecker,
suppor ed by Mr. Hovorka, adopted
Resolution No. 1, 19 76, A Resolution
Approving th e 1980 Urban Boundary,
Functional Cla ssif icatio n , and Conn ecting
Link Designation. (A sig n ed copy of
Resolution No. 1, 19 7 6 is atta ched t o and
mad e a part of the fil e copy of the s e minutes.)
The motion carried with Mr. Nolan voting no.
Housing All ocation Resolution
Mr. Borg er explained that thi s r eso lution was re e rre d to the Program Committee
by the Council, requesting additional informatio n on status of the Regional
Housing Program . Mr. Gene Fortier, Housing Ad visory Committee Chairman,
explained that thi s resolution would ask HUD to add 3 , 000 existing housing
units to thP number a Ire dy authorized for low and moderate income hous ing.
It also asks HUD to transfer funds from the Section 8 New Housing Construction
Program, which Is lnop rabl , to the existing housing program, using the 1972
DRCOG Regional Housing Allocation Model as the basis for assignment to
individua l jurisdictions. The 1 v el o f r ent s permitted by HUD for the new and
r e hablllt t ed housing units has proven Ina dequate to stimulate Involveme nt In
these programs and the Section 8 program t o make e xi sting units availabl for
low and mod re5t incom fe5mlll s appears o be the only on e that has chance
of working.
Info rm t1
utur m
th t th
• •
,
(
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY 21, 1976
Page nine
•
-
Air Quality Cons lstency Statement
Mr . Klotz explained that the Program Committee unanimously recommended
Council adoption of this resolution, acting as the Policy Body for JRPP. The
proposed resolution Is necessary to overcome difficulties arising out of
Department of Health review of the Air Quality Assessment Statement approved
by Council on June 25, 1975. The proposed action states the JRPP position on
the number of points raised by the Department of Health and Indicates that further
work wlll be carried out to reflne the Air Quality Analysts during CY 1976.
The Council, on motion by Mr. DeDecker,
supported by Mr. Clement, unanimously
adopted Resolution No. 3, 1976, A Resolution
Concurring In Positions Related to Consistency
of JRPP Plans With Air Quality. (A signed copy
of Resolution No. 3, 1976 Is attached to and
made a part of the file copy of these minutes.)
LEAA Program Buy-In By th State Leolslature
The Program Committee and Crimina 1 Jus tic Advi s ory Committee both recommended )
Council adoption of this resolution. It uroes that the Colorado General Assembly
appropriate $188,176 as state matching money, or otherwise known as Buy-In
funds for the LEAA program. Th Council wa told that many local LEAA funded
projects are dependent upon continuation grants and dependent upon th Legislature
providing th "buy-ln." The resolution noted that the Leolslatlve supplemental
appropriation to the Division of Criminal Justlc ould satisfy the r deral Law
Enforcem nt Assistance Administration's buy-In r q u lrement.
'
• •
,
•
•
COUNCIL MINtiTES
JANUARY 21, 1976
Page ten
•
•
$181,500, cons isting of $163,350 in FHWA Urban Systems Funds
channeled through CDH and $18,150 in local matching money. As a
result of the expenditure of the grant, the following positive result s
were achieved:
1. Modernization of th e DRCOG Dime file, which is regarded as a
highly useful research and statistica l tool by many governmental
and business organiz a tions, to whom it is also a vallable. (Denver
is one of very few metropolitan areas, among 200 in the nation with
a DIME file, to have a current data bank of this type.)
2. Establlshment of a workable carpoollng apparatus available as an
lternate transportation method that could be heavily and quickly
utilized, if either economics (much higher gasoline prices) or foreign
events (another oil boycott or war) substantially reduce supplles of
reasonably priced petroleum products and Increased pressures on
public transit.
3. Program costs offset by a savings of more than $300,000, which
participants would h ve spent on gasollne had they not been pooling.
4. Wider knowledge throughout the region of DRCOG by all major and
medium-sized employers, who welcomed the program as a logical
method of complyi ng with a little-understood state regul tion.
(Lac In he DRCOG service, employers would have be n particularly
h rd-pr sed to meet even minimum st te carpool requirements without
a staggering expenditure o ... , nd money.)
The loc tor ~ervlce c n thu b r g d succ • for the brief
tim p rlod covered by this survey. In the long run, how v r, Its v ry
existence h s the potential for convertlnq Initial investment 1nto a
p rm n nt s et producing continuing dividends forth r glon .
h nnon r ported th t · the p t slx months, th Crlmln I Justice
n working to shift the pi'OQr m emph sis away !rom th pro e slnQ
of gr n s tow rd gr t r rol of s rvlce nd technic I ss lst nc t o th
cl y nd coun y m mb rs. He un veiled the !lrst r suits of ,..of'lpu ter m pplnQ
of crime to th Council. A pilot prOQram Is underw y to develop comput r
m fo I 1 enforc m n us to pinpoint loc Uons of v rlous cr lm a. St f
r ported th t th m p would b refln d nd prlnt d on monthly basla •
• •
-
(
(
•
•
I • -
vVU>~vlL JVUN Ul'Lt:i
JANUARY21, 1976
Page eleven
Also, a progress report was presented on an eva lua tion being conducted
by staff at the request of City of Aurora officials. The evaluation Is to
determine the effective policy productivity In that city to provide data on
the efflciency of current pollee operations. Polley questions are
continually asked by city counc ils, city managers, commissioners ,
sheriffs and pollee chiefs regarding the effectiveness and efficiency
of policing operations. A handbook Is being developed In an effort to
assist local officials In coming to grips with those concerns.
Report of t he Executive Director
1.
2.
3 •
Mr . Farley reported that the DRCOG staff Is currently d i scussing additional
way s In which the organization can become more r esponsive t o its local
governments. Staff Is expanding Its membership services program and
addressing the following possibilities:
(a) Shared management assista nce ;
(b) Labor/management relations as it rel a tes to local governments;
(c) Federal grants in aid ... whether in addition to A-95 efforts, staff
can do more in a positive way to help local governments obtain
federal grants in aid;
(d) Seminars spe c ifically directed at Issues of interest to local off1c1als;
(e) Providing better liaison with DRCOG' s member governments ..• assigning
s pecific staff to specific jurisdictions to identify needs, gain input ,
and communica te between the respective staffs;
(!) Direct ways that the staff can be made avallable to assist local
jurisdictions, i.e. c ount! shave be en a slsted In the development
of their Affirm ative Action Programs ;
(g) Discussing with city managers what th problems of local governments
re and the possibility of entering Into a personnel exchange where
DRCOG staff might sp nd two or thr e day In a jurisdiction to get
oriented on what Its n eds re ;
(h) Discussion with newly lee d Counc.ll offlcers on th possib1llty of
Counc il Retrea of one o r two days • come to grip with lssu s and
h DRCOG might lmprov Its servlc program to help meet those ne ds.
r nu r y 1 , 1 7 6 l th dlln for au l tng Plan Amendment• for thla cycl
•
•
COUNCIL MINUTES
JANUARY21 , 1976
Page twelve
Calendar of Polley Is sues
•
0
•
The calendar of current Issues and programs was reviewed.
Ot her Matters by Members
None
AdJournment
Ther e being no further business to come before the Councll, the meeting
adjourned at 10:2 0 p.m.
ATTEST:
Robert D. F rl y
Ex cutlv Dlr c or
Norman A. Smith, Chairman
Denver Regional Council of Governments
'
• •
-
•
•
•
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 3, 1976
I. CALL TO ORDER.
3b
Th r gular meetin g of the City Planning and Zoning Commission
wa called to ord r at 7:00 p.m. by Vice-Chairman Tanguma.
1 mbers pr s nt: Don Smith, Jorgenson, Parker, Pierson,
Ed Smith, Tanguma, Williams
Romans, Ex-officio
Members absent: Wade, Jones
Also pre cnt: Associate Planner House
Assistant City Attorney DeWitt
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
Mr. Tanguma stated that linutes of January 20, 1976, were to
b considered for approval.
Mr. Smith stated that Pag 18, 3rd Paragraph, hould how that
h made the statements, and not Mr. Tanguma.
Jorgenson moved:
Ed Smith s conded: Th Minut s of January 20, 1976, b approved
as corr ct d.
AYES :
NAYS :
ABSTAI
ABSE
Jorg n on, Park r, Ed Smith, Tanguma, William
Non
Pi r on, Don S th
Jon s, Wad
Th motion carri d.
Ill.
r . Tangum tat d that n inat1on for Cha1rm n r o n.
Mr. P rk
ond d
r
111
0
T n um
ith
tion
Chatrm n ; r. n aith
Ch tr n oi th C
or Ch ra n clo d.
d ith, T
'
•
•
-
-2-
Written ballots were cast ; Mr. Tanguma was elected Chairman of
the Planning and Zoning Commission for the year 1976.
,_
Parker nominat ed Mr. Ed Smith as Vice-Chairman of the Commission.
Mr. Williams s conded th nomina ion.
Don Smith moved :
Parker seconded : Th no ination tor ice-Chairman be clos d,
and Mr. Smith 1 cted by white ballot.
AYES: Williams, Jorg n on, Parker, Pierson, D. Smith, E. Smith,
Tanguma
NAYS: Non
ABSENT : Jones , Wade
Th motion carri d.
January 20, 1976
It was mov d and second d to raise the matter of the Blomberg
Subdivision Waiver request from th Table. The motion carried.
Mr. Tanguma asked Mrs. Romans for a brief background on this
cas .
Mrs. Roman stated that Mr . Blomberg has requested a Waiver to
the Subdivision Regulations on his property at 2700 West Union
Avenu Th prop rty is located south o f West Union Avenue,
on th ast sid of South Clay Stre t e xtended. Ther is a 16
ft . d dication for South Clay Street adjacent to th w st sid
of th property which wa d dicated several y ar ago by th
prop rty o n r to th w t. Discus ion at the last m tin
c nt r d around wh th r or not th City could r quir th 30
t. ri ht-of-w y from th west side of Mr. 81omb rg' prop rty
to provid c to propertie lying outh of th ubj ct it
If it 1 d t rmin d in th futur that a 60 ft . right-of-ay i
n d d South Cl y Str t, an additional 14 ft. d dication
would b ary from th property to th west.
At 0 v ion
d lO t
hav
tru
(
•
-
-3-
40 ft. from the west property line. In order to protec t some
trees on the site, he would also like to move the structure
to within 25 ft . o f the north property line, rather than the
30 ft. setback from Wes t Unio n Avenue as originally proposed.
Mrs. Romans pointed out that the a r ea to the north o f West
Union Av enue is also zoned for industrial development, and that
Mr. Blombe r g does not have to provide any setback f rom the north
property l ine . Irs. Romans stat ed that a p ropos ed Resolution
has been prepared for re iew by the Commi s ion, an d ci ted the
fo llowing condition for approval of the r quest.
"A, Any struc ture built or placed upon th d cribed property
shall be set back a minimum of 4 0 ft. from the west
property line and 30 ft. from th front property line.
B. A fence sha ll be erected in accord nc ith th vicinity
map attached to this R olution and m rk d "Exhi bit A".
c . No further division of h property h 11
approved by the Pl anning and Zoning Commi
of Englewood.
ak place unl ess
ion of the City
Mr. Don Smith a k C'd why the olu t1o1 pr pared with the
30 ft. s tback from Union Avenu rath r n th 25 ft. now
propo d? Mrs. Romans stated that at th tim th R solution
a pr par d, ~. 81omb rg had indicat d that h int nd d to
t back 30ft., but has sine tat d that h wants to set
back from W st Union Avenu only 25 ft.
Mr. Park r ask right-of-way dedica-
th
•
-
-4-
Mr. Parker stated that he did not want to see the City buying
right-of-way on one hand, and giving it away through vacation
on the other.
Mrs. Romans stated that she fe lt a workable compromise has been
reached; Mr. Blomberg has agreed to set the building back 40
ft. from the west property line and 25 ft. from the north properly
line. If South Clay Street does indeed need to be acquired and
developed, the land will be available for that purpose.
Ed Smith moved:
Williams seconded: The Commission approve Mr. Blomberg's
request for a Waiver to the Subdivision
R gulations as they apply to his property at 2700 West Union
Avenu , and that Resolution #2, 1976, be approved with the
am ndment of Condition "A" to note the structure will be set
back 25 ft. from the front property line.
AYES: Williams, Jorgenson, Park er, Ed Smith, Tanguma
NAYS: None
ABSTAIN: Pierson, Don Smith
ABSENT: Wade, Jones.
The motion carried.
V. WEAVER /FERGUSON REZONING
Findings o1 Fact
CASE #3-76
Mr. Tanguma stated that Findings of Fact on th r zoning r -
qu st fil d by Mr. and Mrs. B. L. Weaver are to b~ con id r d
for approval and r coma ndation to City Council.
Th Findin of Fact w r revi w d.
Willi m moved:
Ed Smith cond d : Th Findin of Fact on Ca #3-7 , th
r zonin r qu t fil d by Mr. nd Mr .
W v r, b approv d and r coma nd d to City Council.
illi m , d s ith
r on, n ai h
Th
,
•
,
(
•
•
..
-5-
Discussion f ollowed; it was agreed th at Mrs. Pi e rson will repre-
sent the Plannin g Commis sion at the AIP/ASPO Con fe rence in
Washington, D.C.
Mrs. Rom a ns stated that at the last meeting she had discussed
with the Commission her c oncern over a variance gi ven to Azar's
Restaurant for a sign exceeding the perm itted height set forth
in the Sign Code. Mrs. Romans stated that she h a d r e ceived a
call from Chairman Leonard of the Board o1 Adjustment who in-
dicated some o f the Board members felt it was not proper for
th e staff to make recommendation to the Board of Adjustment.
Mrs. Romans stated that in reviewing Minutes of the Board for
the past couple of years, it appears that the requirements for
a variance set forth in the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance are
not really being considered and that based on the information
set forth in the minutes, very few o f the cases b fore the
Board meet the requir rn ents of the Ordinance . Mr s. Romans
stat e d that she was asked to write a memorandum to the City
Manager regarding her concern, Copies of that memorandum
have been given to Commission members fo r their review. The
City Council has set a me eting with the Board of Adjustment
on February 9th, at 6 :30 p.m. to discuss these matters. The
members of the Planning Comm1s~i on are invited to atte nd this
me ting. Mrs. Romans stat d that a variance is to be granted
to b n fit a ll an d not for the benefit o f one person, and it
is th method used to grant relief to a prop rty owner if th re
i s om condition existing on the land that rende rs it impossible
m et the requirements of the Comprehensi v e Zoning Ordinanc e .
Romans stated t h at on Tu day,
will be a m eting with RTD to
for 39,000,000 to carry out numb
staff wil l b in attend nc to mak
F bruary lOt h, at 7:30p.m.,
discu s their application
proj cts. The RTD
pr sentalion ; he
tin will b in th Co unity Room.
b for th
'
•
•
•
-
-6-
In the phase being discussed, 269 parking spaces were required
and 283 were provided. In the other phase, they provided onl y
what was r equired. Mrs. Romans stated she was told that Larwi n
management is charging $10 per month for an on-site parking
space, and that this is one reason the tenants are parking on
the streets. Mrs. Romans stated that she felt the Commission
should giv the staff some guidance on this matter .
Mr. Williams stated that from what the Commission learn d from
Mr. Pogue, th e Larwin representative who attended the l ast
meeting, it doesn't appear they are going to live up to their
obligations, and that he supported the staff's determina tion
100%.
Williams moved:
Jorgenson seconded: The Planning Commission disallow th
taking of allotted parking spaces in the
Larwin developm nt, as shown on plans
approved and recorded.
AYES : Ed Smith, Tanguma, Williams, Jorgenson, Parker, Pierson,
Don Smith
NAYS : Non
ABSENT : Wad , Jones
Th motion carried.
Mr . Roman
in
(
(
•
0 ..
-7-
Mr. Tanguma stated that the citizenry has to live by the c odes
and ordinances passed by the City Council and that "if we are
going to continually give people the right to change and bend
ordinances to their own wi hes, we might as well not have any
ordinances and codes." He suggested that perhaps a letter to
the Board of Adjustment or City Council from the Commission in
support of the staff would be proper.
Mr. Parker noted plans of th Fudd's Fritter Factory, and stated
that, in his opinion, if the Board allowed this proposal, they
would have ov e r-stepped their bounds. Mr. Don Smith stated that
this request is to be reviewed by th Board on February 11th,
and added that the City Council is consid ring appeal of the
variance granted to Azar's Restaurant. H suggested that a
letter to City Council supporting app al of the Azar's sign
variance would be in order . lr. Smith stated that he felt a
variance should be the exception rather than the rul , but from
what he has heard from citizens, it seems the Board approves
more requests for variances than they deny.
Mr. Ed Smith stated that the Englewood Sign Cod is in effect
and that until it is changed , variances should b e th exception
rather than the rule. Discussion follow d.
Ed Smith moved : The Commission writ a letter to City Council
supporting Mrs. Dorothy Romans1 po ition regarding
adherance to and enforc ment of the Codes and
Ordinanc s of the City of Engl wood.
Th motion wa• second d.
-
•
•
•
0 -
-8-
Mrs. Romans stated that the Community Development Department
is charged with enforcement o f the Ordinances, and she felt the
Ordinances and Codes should be supported.
Ed Smith stat d that h could not understand why the Board
chose to d viate from the Sign Code; he noted there were a
larg numb r o1 people involved in development of that Ordinance.
Th question was called on Mr. Smith's motion.
AYES: Don Smith, Ed Smith, Tanguma, Williams, Jorgenson, Parker,
Pierson
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Wade, Jones
The motion carried .
Pierson mov d:
Ed Smith seconded:
AYES : Pier on, Don
Parker
NAYS: Non
ABSENT: Wade, Jones
The motion carri d.
The Planning Commission recommend to City
Council that the right of appeal on the
Azar Restaurant sign variance decision of
the Board of Adjustment be exercised.
Smith, Ed Smith, Tanguma, Williams, Jorgenson,
asked why, if th Board of Adju ta nt is allowing
ng s and d viation from th existing ordinances and
, th City Attorn y' off c cannot advise th Board th y
ov r t ppin th ir boun ?
a r ntativ of th City A torn y•
tin th Board .
d that •• ion.
rth r d follo d.
Th II 0 p,ll .
..
1-
,
(
•
0
•
-::~-
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: February 3, 1976
SUBJECT: Recommended Appeal from the Decision of the Board
of Adjustment and Appeals regarding a Variance to
the Sign Code.
RECOMMENDATION:
Pierson moved:
Ed Smith seconded: The Planning Commission recommend to City
Council that the right of appeal on the
Azar Restaurant sign varianc decision of
the Board of Adjustaent be exercised.
" -
AYES : Pierson, D. Smith, E. Smith, Tanguma, Williaas, Jorgenson,
Parker
NAYS : None
ABSENT : Wade, Jones
Th motion carried.
R pectfully ubaitted,
By
and Zonin
•.
• •
-
(
•
•
•
-10-
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RECOMMENDATION OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: February 3, 1976
SUBJECT : Approval of Findings of Fact on Case #3-76
RECOMMENDATION :
Williams IIOVed :
Ed S11ith seconded : The Findings of Fact on Case #3-76, the
rezoning request filed by Mr. and Mrs.
Weaver, be approved and recommended to
City Council.
AYES: Tangu11a, Williaas, Jorgenson, Ed Saith
NAYS : None
ABSTAIN : Parker, Pierson, Don Saitb
ABSENT: Wade, Jones
The aotion carried.
Respectfully sub11itted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Co .. ission.
• •
(
•
0
•
FIRE PENSION BOARD
February 11, 19 76
The Fire Pension Poard met on February 11, 1076 at 2:00p.m. in Conference
Room A at City Hall.
The follow i ng Board Members wer e present:
Oliver Giseburt
Don Braunreiter
Loren D. ~lard
Wi 11 i am James
The purpose of the meeting was to consider two requests for refunding pension
monies. Board Member Jam es stated that pension refunds are taken from the
City firemen's accumulate d bene it fund and not from the regular pension fund
regulated by state statutes. Board Membe r Jam s also stated this would be
the firs refund made by the P.oard.
A discussion ensued regarding ref und~ and the appropria te procedures to be
followed . Board Member James stated that the Ci y Code regulating refunds
allowed the Soard to pay interest on the monies if they so desired.
Board Member James presented a wr itten reques from Adrian Moll for refund
of his pension contributions. The Board decided that no interest should be
allowed on refunds at the present time until the Board has had a chance to
evaluate what appropriate interest rate, if any, should be given.
Board Member Braunreiter mo ved and Board Hemb r Gis eburt seconded a motion
that Adr1an ~oll be refunded his con ributions to the pension fund in the
amount of $4,2Rl. 7. Upon a call o th roll, he vote resulted as follows:
Ayes : Board MeM rs Gise urt, raunrei er, 1-'ard, Ja es.
ay : on .
t t
1 en
Ay s : r nrP. r, ard, Ja s.
ys : on . • •
-
•
•
•
I:.NGLI:.WOOD PA Rk S Rl:C R ATION C OMMISSlON
Minute s of F bruary 12, 1976
The regular monthly mee ting of the E nglewood Parks & Recreation
Commis ion wa s called to order at :30 p.m. by Ruth Allen, chairman, in the
Park Recr ation Deparrm nt.
Member pre ent: Mann , Cu hing, Allen, Poole, Hewitt and Romans,
ex officio
Member absent: Howard and Brown
AI o pres nt: jerry Royth r, Asst. Oir. Parks R creation
Dian Hill, League of Worn n Voters
Poole moved, Cu hing conded, that th minut s of january , 1976
meeting be approved a mailed. Motion carried.
The financial report for December 1975 and januar 1976 were not avail-
able for r vi w.
Mr. Hewitt ha been reappointed to th 'omml ion b th &lard of
Edu ation for anoth r t rm. Th ch and cit council r pre nta-
ttv nth ommi i n will m t to appoint a m m r-at-1 rg to fill the pir d
t rm f 1r . I itt rran in thl me t-
tn ".
111 r c.: omm nct Pond w t bL d
un u l t h com n f 1
th. t 0\!
1r.
t tll
n
tb ll
..
• •
•
•
ENGLI:.WOOD PARKS RECREATION COM MISSION
Minutes of F bruary 12, 1976
The regular monthly me ting of the Englewood Parks & Recreation
Commis ion was called to order at 7:30 p.m. b Ruth Allen, chairman, in the
Parks Recreation Department.
Members present: Mann, Cushing, Allen, Poole, Hewitt and Romans,
ex officio
Members absent: Howard and Brown
Also present: Jerry Royth r , Asst. Oir. Parks R creation
Dian Hill, League of Worn n Voters
Poole moved, Cushin econd d, that th minut s f january , 1976
meeting be approved a mailed. Motion carried.
The financial report for m r 1975 and january 1976 were not avail-
able for r vi
Mr. H witt ha be to th Commi ion b th Board of
du ation for anoth r t rm. h pr nt<ltives and city council repre nta-
tiv on th ommi sion will m r-at-l arg tofillt expir d
t rm of J rr n 1n thi me t-
n, • r ommt nJatt n t
until th ourt cti n n ura com pan
th t
rd
111 inform t on rd
th Z n l ' t ut n pu lli I ln r h t ln rm -
• .
•
,
\
•
Parks & Recreation Commission
February 12, 1976 minutes
Page -2-
•
0 -
tion was taken to th eir office well before the deadline. The Awards Committee
recommended that th RECREATION SER VI E WARD be pr ented to Walt 1orin
at the 1976 Recreation Council dinner. Thi s recommendation was approved by th
Commission.
The con truction of the greenhouse will begin as soon as th e ga service
i nstallation can be finalized. Mr. Romans said he doubts ver much if the
greenhouse will available to s tart bedding plants for the park this summer. Mr.
Hewitt sugge ted that th Arapahoe Douglas Area Voca t ional School be contacted as
a po ibl ource of bedding plants for thi ummer.
1r. R man re rted that the chedule for the River Redevelopment ha
to ch ng J of the elay tn obtaining th land. On of the land owners L
chall nglng the n 'titution lit of Emin nt main in the olorado upr m urt
ich may t , long a thr month . Mr. Roman . aid th cit n
tid . f r th fir t nin l' hol n 1ar h 3 1 r6.
ill T rc 1
ru pm nt of th1
r . 1 rc tnf r m ti n 11 bl mi 1 n m nn c rnm
thi .
< ~.: nr nn
tt n
rn n to tt n tl tr m tin n
rhl r mm oo · tl 1r . II n IIJ
rt tl tin rt r th mm n' t. 11
tl.
•
1-·.
I•
•
Parks creation Commiss ion
February 12, 1976 Minutes
Page -3-
Board said they would consider the request and let the Commission know their decision.
Mr. Royther reviewed th results of a survey taken by the Youth Council
in their r espective schools listing ugge tions and/or criticisms of the parks and
recreation program in Englewood. (copy attached)
Mr. Hewitt said he wa s wondering about the comments that have appeared
in the newspapers attribut ed to Mr. Mann concerning the location of the Senior '
Citizen Recreation Center. Mr. Mann replied that his only objection is t hat a
definit location was designated instead of leaving suitable options open.
The Police Cadet Program ha~ en discontinued so the park patrol for
this summer will n ed to be covered by auxiliary police force. Mr. Romans said
he ha s discus d this probl m with th e Police Chief who assured him the parks would
be adequately patrolled this summ r. There is not h ing more that can be done now
but wait and see how effective this plan will be.
The meeting adjourn d at 9:30 p.m.
•
,
•
-
•
• ,_
0 , •
•
ENG LEWOOD RECREATION CO CIL
january 27, 1976
TO: J rry Royther
FROM: Gene nyder
SUB] T: Results of questionnaire
I. How often do you go to a park?
ever 8 Sometim s 341 Often 258
2 . Do you think park facilitie ar ad quat ?
es 397 No 205
3. cific improv ments of a 1 1 par
jason Par
lleview Park M re tr •
Ltghts for t nnis court n
Jon r
-L ·n
in
pl
R m n urt
lie un.
rtm uth
2
15
2
l
2
1
l
4
3
2
2
1
2
2
1
2
'
• •
,
•
-
Page -2-
Miscellaneou s More trees and flowers 16
More tennis courts 30
Leave tennis courLs open
longer 5
(
More basketball courts 9
More sw imming pools 11
tter drinking fountains 7
Leav dr inking fountains
on all year 2
Open restrooms and clean
them up 23
Leave restrooms open all
year 11
Mor equipment for older
kW 13
Mor benches 2
More pi nic tables 4
Recreation center 1
More \:1ves 5
Grills at Dartmouth and
Rom ns par s 2
on es ion tand 5
wimming pool o n longer 2
4. Acti vi tic not li~ d
16
2
rv r
• •
(
(
•
-
'RI vV LL. PATT E R ON & BALLANTINE
0"""' 4. Clt•e ""t:LL
~.,q,.-~A .. "(R.SON
37 110 SOUTH 8ROA0W A'I"
ENGLEWOQO, COLO R•DO 801 10
Tt.l.E.P..,CN[_ 303 76 1•0800 Pl...,LN .. v ..... A LL.A ... l'I ... C:
<J~ ....... .., ... c,.,.w._......_ .J "
.. c ...... l ... v~,.&:• Fe bruary 17, 1976
•
To:
From:
l·1ayor, Hembers of Ci y Council, City
Manager and City Attorney
Criswell, Patterson & Ballantin
Subject: Atchison ranch litigation
The City of Englewood has been involved in litigation, al-
most continuously, since the latte r par of the year 1967, ove
the rights and obligations arising out of a contrac entered i n to
between the City and the then owner of the Atchison ranch in 948.
Since there was, to rny recollecti on, no rnember of the pre-
sent City Council who was on Council wh en this li igation comnenced ,
and since there have been recent Counc41 changes, even since the
last trial, it is appropriate, \~e think, o provide a short "status
report" to City Council, reviewing that litigation and its p resent
posture.
ln ny v n , c t~· \ola rrin • e
• •
,
-
•
I
I
l
1
1
1
'
•
•
0 I• -
r~ayor, !e mbers o f Ci t y Council, City
Manager a nd City Attorney
Page 2
Feb ruary 17, 1976
water rights and, 1 9 50, leased the ground t o the Atchisons, without
water rights, for a peri o d of f ive y e ar s . In the second year of
the lease with the Atchi sons, the Ci ty determined that the Atchi s ons
ma y have been viola t ing ce rtain p rovi sions of the lease and gave
them written notice o f e v i cti o n, whi c h the Atchison s acceded to.
Thereafter, the City entered i nto t wo consecutive leases, one
wi th an individual by the name of J anow i tz and one \'lith an indiv i -
dual by t he name of Prestrud .
The Atchisons, while aware of these two leases, never com-
plained to the City about them.
Then, in 1956, the City conv i nced Martin that it should move
to this locale, and, as a consequence, entered into a twenty-five year
lease a nd option agreement with Martin of the ground involved.
Again , "'hile the Atchisons were made aware of this lease and option
agreement, they made no complaint about it.
t-1arti n assumed possession under this lease-option agreement
a n d made its rental payments u ntil some time, as I recall, in 1967,
when t h e talk first started about the constructi on of the dam and
r ese r voir. The reservoir now covers a substanti al portion of the
g r ound t hat i s involved. In a ny e vent, when it was ma d e known that
Ma rtin was in the process of exe r c i s ing its option, t he Atchisons ,
for the first time in fourteen year s , advised the City tha t they
were of the view that the orig i n al 1 9 49 agreement required the City
to o f fer to sell the ground to the Atchisons on the saMe terms and
c ond1.t i on s that the City was plan n ing on selling t he sane t o l'lartin,
pu r s uant to Martin's l ease a nd op i on agre ~~e nt.
T l.S, of course, pu t th City r i g ht i n the mi ddle~ if i t so ld
th ~round to th Atchi sons , under he 194 9 a gre e n , i wou l d
b br ach1.ng its agre eme nt w1.t h Mar in; s ~ila r ly, if it went
through wit th ootion-sal to ·a r tin, the tchiso ns would sue
t e City unde r t t e rms of heir 1 4 9 a g r ~ Suffic i o
hat, under he circums anc s, and c t ing on m adv ice, (I
Cl. y Attorn y at the time ), Ci t y Council d t e rrnined o h onor
r 1.n gr . nt nd re is any clai~ by t he A chison und r
1 4 9 ac;r nt .
Atchison• au d the e ity , but, aft r
t 'O y rs, th Colorado sup r cour
s wri t n, was invalid.
T Atch on , th n, start d a new lawsuit, bas d upon t h
• •
-
l
l
' I
l
1
I
1
t
t
• l
l
(
•
•
0
•
f.1ayor, tiembers of City Counci 1, City
Manager and City Attorney
Page 3
February 17, 1976
, .
theory that, if the original agreement was invalid, they were
still entitled to cancel the 1949 agreement and receive back all
of the ground and water rights involved or, in the alternative,
an amount of money equal to their present value.
Originally, the trial court dismissed this complaint on the
theory that the Atchisons should have, but did not, raise this
issue in the first lawsuit and, since they had not raised it in
the first lawsuit, they could not raise it in a second lawsuit.
This case also went to the Colorado Supreme Court where the court
reversed the trial court and sent it back for a new trial.
This trial took place in the early part of 1974 and the under-
signed was engaged as special counsel for the City, shortly prior
to the trial date, to try ~~e case on behalf of the City, since
he had, in effect, lived with the mat er for some years.
The trial court again ruled in favor of the City and of Martin
and the Atchisons have again appealed to the Colorado Supr~e Court,
where all parties have previously filed written briefs and legal
argument. I recently recevied notification from the Supreme Court
that oral argument in the case before the Supreme Court will take
place at 9:00 a.m. on Monday, April 5, 1976.
I am, of course, confident that the Colorado Supreme Court
will affirm and uphold the trial court's decision in this matter
and, if it does so, I think that this legal dispute will, at long
last, be brought to a conclusion. On the other hand, there is,
of course, no guarantee of the Supreme Court's actions and , since
the Atchisons could, I think, prove legitimate damages to the tune
of approximately two million dollars, it is a very important case
so far as the City is concern d.
There is no necessity, of course, for any member of the City
County or of the City's administrative sta f appearing before
the Suprem Court at the t~e of or 1 argum nt. Howev r, those
matters are, of course, public sessions and, should any one de ir
o appear to observe the proceedings, you are quite welcom to do
so.
It is possibl to for cast, with any d gr e ot c rtainty,
wh n he Supr Cour will is its d cision. I would ausp ct,
d sol ly upon my previous xperienc , how v r, th a decision
b !orthcooing s~~ tim within p riod of approxim tely
ty d ys aft r th oral argun nt i pr s nted and I ill, of
'
• •
tl
•
•
•
-
Nayor, Members of City Council, City
Manager and Cit y Attorney
Page 4
February 17, 1976
course, advise the City immediately upon receiving the sane.
If any member of the City family \'/Ould like more information
upon this matter, or have any questions concerning this matter,
I am sure that either I or Bernie Berardini, the City Attorney,
would be happy to advise you further.
JAC:clm
A.Cri~
RISWELL, PATTERSON
& BALLANTINE
• .
• •
,
-
II
J
l
•
City of
Englewood,
lorado
•
0 I• -
3 6-1975
ANNUAL
REPORT
'
• •
f
() -
•
•
•
ll
II
II
II
II
II
It
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
•
•
0
•
CITY OF E NG LEWOOD COLORADO
ANNUAL REPOR T
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR OF
JANUARY 1,1976 -DECEMBER 31,1976
---CITY COUNCIL---
JAMES L. TAYLOR
MAYOR
David B. Clayton -Mayor ProTem
Donald L .A. Smith
Douglas T. Sovern
Andrew J. MCCown ~~ C1ty Manager ~
ARL NOLLENBERG R -ASST CITY MANAGER
CHARL S B CARROLL JR ·UTILITI S
K LLS WAGGON R PU LIC
RICHARD A LORIG· RSONN L
DO OTH A ROMANS · M
Howard R. Brown
Donald W. Williams
Vernon M. Mann
Bernard V. Berardini
City A ttorney
HARRIET LUTE LIBRARY
wm A HAMILTON FIR
RO RT R HOL M S ·POLIC
wrno JAM ·FINA
PR ANS · nd c
'
• •
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
0 -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
REPORT SECTION
Finance ...•.......................................... 1
Personnel ................................•........... 2
Police .............................•................. 3
Fire ................................................. 4
Public Works ......................................... 5
Parks nd Recreation ................................. 6
Library .............................................. 7
Utilities .•....••.......•....•....................... 8
Community Dev lopmen ................................ 9
'
• •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
0
•
Finance Department Annual Repor t
The Finance Department consists of five divisions: Treasury and Record,
Accounting and Automated Systems, Purchasing, Revenue, and ·unicipal Court.
Treasury and Record is the administrative division responsible not only
for the usual financial functions, but also for the City Clerk func ions.
During 1975 this division started a review of the City Clerk func ions o
eva luate areas that needed upda ed. These areas are:
1. City files-reorgan·zation of all City official documents
to be completed in 1976.
2. Recording of Ordinances and Resolutions to be upda ed and
com pleted during 1976.
3. Index all subject rna ter relating o inutes, Ordinances
and Resolutions.
4 . Microfilming all official documents for a pe~anent r cord.
Finance areas o e upda ed:
l. Revise investm n procedures.
2. Revise accounting procedures for Cap tal l ~pr o v men s in the
~!a er and S wer Fund .
3. Upda Organizational Charts.
4.
asst.' s.
yp wri
will e
1.
?. S r
hroug an in conjunc ion
• •
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I• -
-2-
urchasing Division is responsible for procuring all co
ual services, and capital items for the City. In add
ion, ur c asi ng is r s ponsible for Central Services w ic
pri n i n rvi ces o all City Departme nts. Central Serv ·c
di es o i c sup plies.
r par o t e P ~r c hasing functions is Central S or
ous i ng s r ices of commonly used items by all d par
expanded i s inventory over the last bto years fr
$1 0 ,000. A progra to be s arted in 1976 will provide all d
an in n ory catalogue of all items available through Centra l
Purchasing manual will also be updated in 1976.
a l
er
Revenue Division is responsible for receiving all monies for t e City
through Central Cashiering. This division is also responsi 1 for all of e
various City licenses, including sales and use tax licenses. T is divisio
also revie~ted its operations to determine what areas needed to be revised.
updated, or have new programs. Th following areas are eith r in the process
of review or will be evaluated during 1976:
1. Sales tax ord 1 1ance.
2. Prepare a sales tax guide.
3. More effective method of identifying sales ta accou nts
that need to e audited.
4. Revision of sales tax systems.
5. Develop a more comprehensive cash flow program.
Municipal Court Division is responsible for all record keeping and court
processing functions of the Municipal Court. Ourinq 1975, a committee ·was
formed to review the Model Traffic Code and City ordinances regarding traffic
regulations. At the present time, the committee is awaiting the updated ver-
sion of the Model Traffic Code b fore any final r connendations are made.
Other areas that are under revi w are par inq ickets, cour co-ordinator,
cour process s rv1 g, and pr para ion of subpoena and court notices.
• •
,
•
1-
•
I Portion of Year to Date ~
Ut:AUDITED
I OEPARTHENT OF FIIIANCE
REALIZATION OF BIJDGETED REVE!lUES
GENERAL FUND
I Through December 31, 1975
% of Last Last
I Budgeted Current Y ar to Budget Year Year
Revenues Y,onth Da e ~_ol~ted J:o Oate _%_
I Taxes:
Property Tax $ 646,819 $ 35,809 $ 653,686 101 $ 172,565 100
Specific Ownershi p 46,509 1 ,001 46,136 9q 27,613 100
I Sales Tax 3,149,333 252,909 3,1Q3,965 101 3,231,655 100
Cigarette Tax 450,000 40,268 472,844 . 105 469,837 100
Franchise Tax 367,835 359,8~1 98 334,489 100
I Total $4,6 0,496 $329,987 $4,716,472 101 $4,23 ,159 10
I Licenses & Permits:
usiness Licenses $ 'i9,800 $ 5,121 $ 71),3()6 118 $ 51,617 100
ui ding Licenses 29 0 0 214?2 4 017 186 571715 100
I Tota l $ 88,800 $ 7,543 $ 124,323 11\0 $ 109,332 100
I Inter-Governmental
Rev nues:
I
Federal Grants &
Re enue Sharing $ 696,660 $168,422 $ 97,185 100 $ 102,872 100
State Grants 3,045 2,000 5,045 166 13.150 100
a e S ared Revenue 285,000 5,729 277,775 97 283,360 100
I rapa oe Bridge & Road 1,500 ----0,887 9q 571209 !QQ.
Total $1,046,205 $176,151 $1,040,8Q2 qq $ 45 , 591 100
c
$ 13 ,000 $ 32,956 $ 137,180 102 $ 116,124 100
,800 523 6,27fi 92 c;,802 100
36,020 5,832 3 ,791 102 20,043 100
7,500 423 7, 7 lfl2 10,390 100
10,000 10,000 100 10,000 100
10,07 1 • 12 1 ,.,327 1
23,100 2. 47 10, I) 20, 34 1
25,480 1,2 1 2 ,715 101 17. q 00
24,:125 472 23,222 5 21 ,181 1
875 408 47 321 100
13,1 9 15, 118 2 ,12 HlO
2,400 3,214 1 4 3,819 100 • • 13,500 12,741 4
ct 29 578 __ 2,710 2 ,281 R5 ~
To al $ 34 ,R25 $ 4 • 24 100
,
•
• -•.
0 I•
•
I Realization of Budgeted Re enues-Unaudi ed
General Fund
I Through December J], 1915
Page 2
I % of Last Last
Budgeted Current Year to Rudget Year Year
I Rev enue s tlonth [late Collected to Date -~----
Fines & Forfeitures:
I Court Fines $ 89,800 $ 8,623 $ 88,554 9!l $ 74,016 100
Library Fines 7,800 1,040 8,957 ill 7,586 lQQ.
Total $ 97,600 $ 9,663 $ 97,511 100 $ 81,602 100
I
i see 11 aneous:
I Interest $ 43,125 s 29,483 68 $ 7Q,686 100
Rentals 843 0 3,431
Gain on Sale
I
of Assets 1 0 109,979 100
Other 48,445 u.qc;o _37, 92 78 37,955 100
Total $ 91,570 $ 5,959 $ ,01 9 74 $ 227,620 100
I
I Total Revenues 6 331,496 $575,827 6 3Rfi,558 lQl $5,4091893 100 ----
I
I
I
• •
•
• -
0 I•
•
I Portion of Year to Date J..QQ!_
UNAUDITED
I DEPARTI1ENT OF F ltiANCE
EXPENDITURES TO 1975 BUDGE T
G[ti[RAL fUND
I Throug h December Jl 19_IL
Last Last
I Annual Current Year to Date % of Year Year
Bud et E~enditures Expenditures Budge t to Date _%_
I Legislation & Council:
City Council $ 67,833 $ 2,952 $ 68,176 101 $ 50,463 100
Board of Adjustment 3,000 341 2,659 89 2,829 100
I Career Service 8,044 379 5,528 69 4,305 100
Planning & Zoning 4,945 422 4,7 99 97 4,435 100 '
Library 2,360 919 2,248 95 2,383 100
I City Attorney 87,550 6,439 83,394 95 77,272 100
Housing & Redevel. 1,149 17 486 42 528 100
I Sub-To a1 $ 174,881 $ 11,1169 $ 167,2qo 96 $ 142,2 5 100
anagement:
I Ci y 'anager $ 100, 55 $ 8,54 1 $ 97,81)fi 97 $ 94,545 100
Personnel 521430 4 1 253 52.175 100 41 191 100
I u -ota1 $ s 12.794 s 149,981 qg 100
I s 74,912 s 8,015 $ 72,867 97 $ q5, 791 100
77,447 6,080 71,4 3 q2 75,588 100
I 123,499 9 140,119 100
106,07 100 104,043 100
75,010 102 63,095 100
I ion 187 925 ~ 167!628 100
s 9,064 $ 49,3 3 100 $ 64 ,264 10
$ s
7 100
101 100
1l1 100
an 7 _,_
u -To al 100
• Fi $1,27CI,\2 q • 02 1 • • 42 100
•
• -•.
0 t•
•
I Exp~nditurcs to 1975 Budget-Unaudited
General Fund
Through December 31, 1975
I Page 2
I Last Last
Annual Current Year to Date % of Year Year
Budget ExEenditures Fxp_enditures eud et to Date %
I Police:
Police Dept. $1,500,346 $123,805 $1,490,431 99 $1,297,155 100
Co rrm unications 217,643 24,088 221,492 102 188,043 lQQ
I Sub-Total $1,717,989 $147,893 $1,711,923 100 $1,485,198 100
I Corrmu nity Development:
Code Enforcement $ 174,247 $ 14,745 $ 168,543 ° 97 $ 137,507 100
I Housing & Redevel. 20,055 2,650 24,074 120 20,412 100
Planning 110,137 71186 105,293 96 98,583 100
Sub-Total $ 304,439 $ 24,581 $ 297,910 98 $ 256,502 100
I
Library: $ 266,026 $ 45,652 s 2'15,525 96 $ 223,693 100
I Parks & Recreation:
I Par s $ 518,328 $ 42,802 s 515,729 99 $ 611 ,437 100
Outdoor Swim Pool 38,936 (20) 36,247 93 23,171 100
Indoor Swim Pool 53,306 2,320 37,881 71 34,745 100
Sports & Games 69,098 4 '199 52,009 75 35,169 100
I Cultural Activities 55,450 5,930 47,472 86 37,572 100
Playgrounds 30,307 0 31,49f) 104 13,751 100
oft all 20,120 223 15,476 77 18,922 100
7oo 8,654 38 10,32~ 119 13, 3 100
General Operations 88,314 5,340 82 ,87 4 4 72,043 100
Old Tim rs 2'2.240 795 ?21381 1JU_ 18.304 100
I u -Total $ 904,7 3 $ 61,975 s 85 1,888 4 $ 878,797 100
I
Tota 1 f ndf ures 98 S5.691a065 100
• •
,
•
l -
I•
•
I Portion of Year o Da e 100_!.._
UNAUD ITED
I DEPARTI1 EIIT OF FIN/\NCE
REALIZATIO N OF BUDGETED REVEflUES
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FUND
I Throug h ~ecemb er 31. 1975
I % of Last Las t
Budgeted Curre nt Yea r to eudget Year Year
Revenue _Month Date Coll ct d to 0~~ % -
I Tax es :
Sal s Tax $1,5 74,667 $126,453 $1,59 1,941 lQ.!.. 100
I ub-Tota 1 $1,574,667 $126,453 $1,591,941 101 $1,615 ,803 100
I Inte r governm ntal
Revenu e:
Revenue Sharing $ 45 ,115 $ 736,689 100
I
Federa l Grant 628,000 $ 710,500 0
State Grant 82,500 44,730 100
State Shared Rev enue 11 ,427 11 ,427 11,697 100
I ub-Tota1 $ 767,042 $ 721,927 94 $ 793 ,116 100
I Mi sce llan eo us:
Inter es t $ 100,000 $ 62,62£; 63 $ 22 6,197 100
Contributions 12,000 12,000 100 185,723 100
Other 10,000 (202) 0 27 ,604 100
I Eond Proceeds 2,307,067 0
ub-Tot a1 $2,429,067 $ 74,424 3 $ 439,524 100
I
To a1 Rev nues $41770177 6 $126 ,4.,?3 $213881292 ~ $2,848,443 10 0
I
I
Cu u1at1ve f p nditures rroJ c t a lance
Bud_ge t Cu .. r nt onth_ o Date Availab!_t
$ 3 1,095 $15,119 3 4,844 $ p.749l 519 ,520 529 ,442 9,922
R,880 00,8 {11,9 6
680,000 (1, 00) 0,131 2q. 69
11 53,000 o.o 0 3,000 • •
La d cquis t io It Little
Dry Cr a nd I • r
,
•
• -
t•
•
I Rea 1 i za t ion of eudge ed Revenues -Unaudited
Public Improver1ent Fund
Through _p~c~mber 31 2Z5
I Page 2
I Cumulative Expenditures Project Ra 1 ance
Bud et Current 11onth to Date Available
I Sidewalk District $ 13,344 $ 13,344
Traffic Improvements 95,000 $ 113 83,008 $ 11,992
I Zuni Street
~avajo Alignment-ROW 45,901 45,901
I Paving District #22 109,5()0 39 10 9 ,461 ..
I
Parks:
Rates-Logan 3,900 2,850 1,050
Belleview West 90,339 248 78,242 12 ,097
Romans Park 311 , 552 5,593 312,095 (543)
I N.W. Greenbelt 47,302 39,118 8,184
S. ~1. Gr eenbe lt 112,250 349 109,297 2,953
Interchange 24,850 6,489 18,361
I Swimming Pool
Auxiliary Boiler 15,500 15,500
I HandicappPd Play Apparatus 12,0()0 12,000
Floyd . venue prinkling 5,400 4,692 708
I River l'edev 1o nt 1,644,291) 451 385,54 9 1 ,258. 741
I Greenhouse 35 ,000 9 2,787 32,213
Tennis Cour s 119,713 115,360 4,353
I Fire Training Facility 80,000 7,500 72,500
Fire tation -.w.
Housing 249,000 125 ,0()0 124,000
City Hall pr1n 1 ing 13,100 13.337 (237)
1d rly II u fng Co slruction 2,307,0 7 2,0 3,650 2,043,650 263,417
p ce U fl h tlon S udy 9,()00 Q,OOO
land UI C : ar (ld rly
Hou ing SH 40,000 2. 50 2, 50 37,3 0 • •
S7,r. ,51)3 $2, • 11),_91 $1,975,812
,
•
• -• .
•
I Portion of Year to Date ...J..QM__
UNAUDITED
I DEPARTI~ENT OF F l NANCE
REALIZATION OF BUDGETED REVEimES
SHIER FUND
I Throug h December 31, 1975
% of Last Last
I Budgeted Current Year to Cud ge t Year Year
Revenue l~onth Date Collected to Date _%_
I Disposal Service $ 580,000 $(41,189) $571 t 125 98 $522,762 100
Other:
I Connection Fees-Inside 8,000 1,404 10,677 133 21 ,125 100
Connection Fees -Outside 150,000 1. 717 136,941 91 144,485 1.00 ' Interest 45,000 54,607 121
I Gain on Sale of Assets 346,700
Inspection Charges 3,000 96 3,648 122 3,104 100
I~ i see 11 a neous 6,500 367 22,993 354 31,288 100
I Sub-Total $ 212 ,500 $ 1,1)84 228,866 108 $546,702 100
I Federal & State Grants:
Bi-City $3,612,596
Other 18,500
I Sub-Total $3,631,096
I Bond ale Proceeds $1,550,000
I Total R enues $5,973,596 $(37, 05) 799,991 13 $1,0 9,4 4 100
I
EXPENDJTUR S TO 1975~~ET
I Last
I of Yttar
•
Tre nt $4,775,017 $25.450 $24 t 2 5 $227, 0 100
ani dry Syst 5 ,241 4, 1,793 92 137,20 100
A infs ra ion
• G n ral 3 4 055 24 2 8 520 74 31 ?51 lOQ. • •
To al Exp n 11 100
• -•.
0 I • -
I Portion of Year to Date ~
UNAUDITED
I DEPARTMEN T OF FINANCE
REALIZATION OF RIJDGETEO REVEJlUES
~lATE R FUN D
I Through December 31, 1975
I % of Last Last
Budgete d Current Year to Budget Year Year
Revenue 11onth Date Collected to Date -~-
I Water Sales $1,023,352 $1,003,311 98 $1,042,645 100
Other:
I Connection Charges 35,00D $ 1,387 36,802 105 71,163 100
Property Tax ' 876 100 ' Rentals 4,848 2,202 7,084 . 146 11,255 100
I Interest 51,000 5,362 11 103,061 100
r,ain on Sale of Assets 50 0
Bond Proceeds 24,190 . 24,190 100
I Mi see 11 aneous 36,000 8,916 37,042 103 711149 100
Sub-Total $ 151,038 $ 12,505 $ 110,530 73 $ 257,504 100
I Total Revenues ~11174!390 $ 12,505 $1,113,841 95 $1,3001149 100
I
I EXPENDITURES TO 1975 BUDGET
I las las
Annual Current Year to Date of Yt!!ar Year
llud et Ex(!enditures Ex enditur s Budget to Da~ -~-
I ourc & upp1y $ 330,377 $ 16,129 2 7,329 81 $1,193,441 100
I o er & Pumping 113,748 11,603 117,388 103 126,210 100
Punficatfon 12 ,254 9,691 125,6 100 117,212 100
• I Tran • Dis 202, 1 11,723 193, 30 95 2 ,221 100
i lling Col1 ion 57,287 10.484 ,37 99 75,511 100
G nera1 759 918 11 371 244 54 E. 572,490 100
• I To al E p ns $ 71 01)1 $1 005,427 63 $2 291 ~ 11)0 • •
-•
._
~ --------- -
s
rfals to Co
Jury Trials
JurY Trials Cancelled
Jury Trials Continued
Jury Trfals OfgJfssed
Pretrial Conferences
Orher School Attendance
•
•
l'liNI CIPAL COURT
NUMBER OF CASES FILE D
1973
1,708
1,093
33
50
15
0
,
1974 1975
1,612 2,832
940 1,022
25 12
53 68
20 4
6 2
54 80
178 314
r I .
';'
' ..
,
I
•
" I
L.....i
• -------------------•
lt!NICIPAL COURT
NUMBER OF SUtflONS FILED
1973 1974 1975
rJfftc Violations 2,083 1,969 3,024
Parking Vtolattons 5,663 7 ,526 8,367
Other Ordinance Vfolattons 570 453 169
Oog Ordinance Violations 3'1 160 419
I • •
ise Ordinance Violations --110
Complaints {Citizen, Sales Tax, & Bldg. Dep t .) 225 173 90 ------
~
TOTALS 8,577 10,281 12,179
282 249 317
....
I
,
•
•
~
• • I ------------------
MUHIC I PAL COURT
REVENUE
Source 1973 1974 1975
rlfffc Cftltfons (Y1o1 at1ons Bureau) ~2~.313.50
(inc. parki ng Jan.-June)
$14.715.00 $28,151.50
Cftltions 5,664.()0 18,462.00 18 ,842.00
(July -December)
Court Cases 28,491.00 26,451.00 34,5Cl0.0r)
Court Costs 5,417.00 5,370.00 8,144.75
Witness Fees 1,157.00 530.00 820.00 I r 0 •
Bond Forfeitures 1,815.00 8'35.00 650.00
Jury Fees 575.00 51)0.00 900.00
~
·al Bond Fees 4.50 -0-1.50
Driver Improv~ent School ftes -0-1,178.25 1 ,631.00
County (CUI's & OWl 's ) 12 ,184.50 13,512.00 6,269.00
-
OTAlS $81,621.50 $81,603.25 $99,999.75
'l
\
,
•
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
-
PERSONNEL ANNUAL REPORT
1975 provpd to be a challenging year for Personnel in the employment
function because of he Ci y 's moratorium on hiring . 1 lead to
participation under the Federally subsidized ETA VI >r o ram in
order o fill vitally needed positions . No newly crpa:ed positions
were filled and as of he end of 1975 , he new osi ions were deleted.
27 new employees were hired , 10 coming under CETA , 6 for the emergency
services an the remaining 11 going into v acant positions necessary
to provi e he c urr ent level of municipal services .
For th year, approximately 773 applications were received , even
with the moratorium in effect . Some 225 of these applicant s we r e
interviewed wi h approximat ely 370 being es ed primar i ly for police
officer an firef1ghter so that elig1bil1 y lis s could e pdated .
Turnover for the year dropped partially ue to the
also he laggin economy or the Metro Denv r area . 9 .6~, a rop of 2 .2% ft·om 1974 's 1 L .o %. Tt.; ye r•
ook place vers s 44 las ye r . t: '> ·n f'rP-s 1 ~
mora orium and
The ra e was
32 termina ions
o no e ha 11 , or 33 , were re irements and one wa_ ne dea h
employe . Thr e o her erminat ions 1-1 r e y l e ave w1 ho• s ch
as rna erni y , and hree addt ional po 1 ions were vaca e ec use of
shlf 1n ETA personnel . As of Decemb er 31 , 197S , 334 full ime
ernploy e w r· .:>n h Ci y rolls l~i h i proxim tely 20 r time
whic. 'nclui Police if' s . Only 27 new people were hired and in
t.hrt> .1. a 1 position b ing fille for h second time
in riod .
'
• •
I
I
•
•
•
0 , .
•
administrative cost s a vings and b etter emplo y ee public relatio n s .
Annual negotiations have become a major part of the Personnel function .
Survey data is necessary that is collected s t arting in March along
with Metro -wide benefit data as well as Metro -wide and national c ost
of living information . The months of April , May , and June are spent
in actual negotiation and much office ime is spent on preparing
proposals and counter proposals for presentations .
The work of the Career Servi~e Board began being quite heavy in earJy
1975 due t o the multiple hearings for Officers Vaughn , Reynol~s ,
Welbourne , and Wing . The hearings spanned a month and a hall' time
period in the evenings and involved testimony from over twenty witnesses .
The f i nal decision reins ated two terminated police officers , shortened
the suspension for Officer Reynolds and upheld the letters of repri -
mand on Officers Vaughn , Weluourne and Reynolds .
The Career Service Board had only one other formal hearing during
the year. Mary Howard , Children 's Librarian, grieved two letters
of reprimand placed in her file by the Library Director. After
receiving testimony he Board fel~ that the secon letter of repri -
mand was to be remove !:u that trJe firs let er was o remain in Mrs.
Howard 's file .
Career Service was called upon wice in 1975 o fulfill its role as
mediator-factfinder during the collec ive bargaining proces . Af er
impasse betwe n the ity and Police, he Board held its hearing an
r led in he City 's favor. Both sides accepte he Board's decision
The Board hen hel a hearing on one i em in he Firefigh rs '
contrac ha pertained to overtime. One . again they ruled in the
City 's favor and their decision was final .
The Board itself this year , 1975 , ha
Thi brough bou re-ori n a ion 'or
m mber of procedures . Also th
be in to review old r lings o
nd pes ible ch n
a chang
h Boar
rs h
vl o u rings
• •
,
]-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
0
·, •
ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT
ANNUAL ACTIVITY' REPORT
1975
t•
The Englewood Pol ice partment experienced three major changes relating to
tne position of Chief of Pol ice during 1975 . Chief Jack Clasby went on sick
leave on February 10, 1975 , and was g ranted a medical retirement effective
Ma rch 1, 1975. Captain Robert ~1organ was appointed Acting Chief of Pol ice
on February 10, 1975 , ana served In that capacity unti I October 19, 1975.
Captain Robert Holmes of the Lakewood partment of Public Safety was ap-
pointed Chief of Pol ice tor the Ci ty of Englewood on October 20 , 1975.
A statistical recap of 1975 reflects an increase of tour percent <4%l in
the tot a I number of calls tor po II ce service. There was a decrease of two
point six percent ( .6 ~) in the total number of motor vehicle traffic
accidents , a decrease of one percent ( 1%l In the total number of actual
Class I Index Crimes, a decrease of 43 percent (43%l in the total number of
actual Class II lnd >.Cri mes, and an i r~rease of eight point five percent
(8.5~) In the total runbur of cases clthlred by arrest.
•.
'
• •
I
r•ts
ts
CIT AT IOU~
,.t
Count~ Court
Adult!.
Juvenl ,les
• .....
•
-------------
WGLE\'IOOI.J POLICE ctPARWENT
AMJLAL ACTIVITY REPORT
197:i
1973 1974 1975
2169 223.3 2175
261 306 287 , 1 5 J
24 30 21
312 334 262
1736 1603 2544
5663 7526 8367
1 4 37
526 451 180
351 250 167
13 12 17
34 27 41
12 24 38
88 73 138
94 99 130
726 1336 1641
Cother than by citation)
150 188 149
175 215 210
•r I 0
~
.
'
•
...
-----•
CTIVITY P£PORT 1975
1973 1974
d 2109 2355
34 160
d ;,22 1131
304
388
es lice ted
Inn ( !ortnEirl y Los Pr i rros) 0 10
14 9
11
12 9
3 1
0 1
0 1
tt1e 1 1
0 0
3 5
9 13
3 1
s 2 1
r of PI Zlll 35 25
16
0 1
4 3
3 1
20 29
(formerly Hungate's) 2 1
..Jl 2
'Totals 146 149
•
•
---
1975
2825
41
760
543
846
234
$5,091
$4 ,917
$3 ,412
$1 ,471
1
19
14
7
0
1
0
0
1
2
1
6
1
0
20
4
0
0
0
20
1
0
98
,
-
Englewood
Li tt I eton
County
Sheri dan
Englewood
Littleton
County
Sheri dan
-
r I 0
7
I
•
'It
I
ACTIVITY REPORT 1975
,572
11 ,516
11,326
12,185
14 ,506
17 ,751
19,062
21 ,289
2,963
• 79 4
7 ,873
T ARRESTS
396
20
451
637
738
73
73
1,070
1,142
1,173
•
•
---
TOTAL OFFENSE REPORTS
1965 1,020
1966 1,426
1967 1,242
1968 1,574
1969 2,224
1970 2 ,673
1971 2 ,884
1972 3,196
1973 3,263
1974 4,251
197 5 4 ,339
TOTAL JUVENILE ARREST S
65 623
1966 728
1967 794
1968 714
1969 982
1970 1,196
197 1 1,343
1972 1,05 0
1973 1,331
1974 1,543
1975 1,417
,
---
•r
...........
I
I . .
~
._,
I
I --------------•,I I
ACTIVITY REPORT 1975
CLASS I OFFENSES
OfFEtlSE NUMBER OF ACTUAL OFFENSES TOTAL CLEARED BY ARREST CLEARED BY JUVENILES
.l21l .!.21.! 197 5 1973 1974 1975 1973 1974 1975
rder 2 0 1 2 0 1
slaughter 0 . 0 5 0 0 5
by force 3 6 3 2 5 1 0 1 0
Assault to Repe 4 3 2 1 0 0
Al"''llld Fbbbery 42 61 68 12 15 29 1 2 4
StronQ-arm Roboery 25 21 33 2 5 12 2 2 9
13 8 4 8 3 3 2 1 0
4 5 5 4 3 0 1 2 0
7 13 7 5 6 2 1 1 0 I 30 39 19 13 24 8 2 4 0 I r ' 0 • 27 16 72 14 6 17 7 3 6
i
I
ry 338 546 434 42 40 73 14 19 2 1
ry 1b4 181 215 5 14 19 3 8 12 ~
4 37 39 1 0 4 0 0 2
Larceny *1 909 *2215 *2242 649 702 755 381 334 397
Auto Theft ~ _lli. 277 __22. _M 34 _ll . 41 _1l
TOTAL C~SS I OFFENSES 30 10 3477 3426 850 887 963 48 5 418 464
•~icures Include stolen bicyc les: ( 1973 -238) ( 1974 -25 4) ( 1975 -177)
"
,
• ~
•
I
tf' --------------------•II I
ACTIVITY REPORT 1975
CLASS I I OFFENSES
OFFENSE NUMBER OF ACTUAL OFFENSES TOTAL CLEARED BY ARREST CLEARED BY JUVENILES
1973 1974 1975 1973 1974 1975 1973 1974 1975
Kidnapping 1 3 2 1 3 0 0 0 0
Extortion 0 3 9 0 2 0 0 0 0
ercotlcs 77 173 78 63 165 73 2 8 66 35
Arson 5 8 6 3 0 2 2 0
FreiJd 36 43 2 3 12 15 18 0 3 4
oraery/CoL.Iltorfolt lng 8 46 32 4 30 16 1 1 2
Stolen Property 1 3 6 1 3 6 1 1 5 I r 0 • epons <carrying , possessing) 6 13 9 6 13 9 0 1 5
Indecent Exposure/Acts 44 47 51 6 11 7 3 1 0
ProstItutIon 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0
~
aodell sra 660 1040 744 21. _Jl. 8 ~ 8 4
TOTAL 838 1379 961 127 255 140 54 81 56
~
I
,
• ~
•
•
1
0
•
ACT I VI TY REPORT 1975
ACCI~NTS
INTERSECTIONS WITH 12 OR MORE ACCI DENTS
LOCATION
Private Property
Acoma & Be lleview
Bannock & Hwy . 285
Broadway & Belleview
B roadway & Centennial
Broadway & Chenango
Broadway & Comell
Broadway & Dartmouth
Broadway & Eastman
Broadway & Floyd
Broadway & Girard
Broad ay & HarJllden
Broadway & Hwy. 285
Broadway & Mansfield
Broadwey & Oxford
Broadwdy & Quincy
Chero ee Hwy . 285
Clarkson & wy. 285
I !:Ia i & Hwy. 21:!5
Fed ral & t:;e I levi ew
Fox Hwy. 285
Logan Dart uth
Logan & H flllden
Logan Hwy. 5
I ·nn t .. y. e5
H.. • o5
•
NUMBER OF ACCIDENT S
485
24
13
28
17
21
21
31
14
31
26
22
18
15
20
21
14
19
19
22
15
14
13
19
16
47
18
23
,._
• •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
0 -
INTII.oFPfCI
MU•ORANDUM
TO: Karl Nollenberger , Assistant City Mgr. DAnh January 2 6 , 197 6
~~ Wm . A. Hamilton, Fire Chief
su~~. Statis tica l Data of Fire Operations -1975
You wil l n o te s t a tistical data listed in six categ ori e s.
1 -Alarms within four districts
2 -Fi r e a l a rm s in twelve catego ries
3 -Re s c u e alarms in seventeen categories
4 -F ire prev ention in five categories
5 -Investigatio n s referred to Arson in ten categor ies
6 -Training r eported in five categories
Attach ed r e ports i nclude the following:
,_
1 -Tr aining Divi sion report from Capt. McFarland, i n cluding educa-
tiona l leve ls of all personnel. Th i s report i n dicates an above
average educa tional level and educat i onal in i ti a t ive .
Also inc l uded are total hours of training by ea c h individual, includ ing Vo lunteers.
2 -Ar son r e port from D-0-E Cli f f Selby, arson i nvest igator.
His comm e n ts and investigative data, in my op i n ion , reflec t
a n e x t r e me l y high competency leve l of fire investigation .
3 -Since ou r F i re Prevention Bureau was recently r eorganized,
n o w con si st i ng of two captains (Ron Boston and El d en Boh ) ,
new fili n g a nd report i ng methods are being r e v ised to reflect
a more comp l ete sched ul e of a c t i v i t i es. This will be more
accurately reflected in ou r repo rt fo r 1 9 7 . Programs already
initia ted have and will be significant in promoting and affect-
ing public safety , p r eventin g f ire l osses , as w 11 as r vising and enforcing pu b lic safety cod es .
Significant Increases --
Rescue alarms up 15\ over 1974
Fir alarms up 28\ over 1974
0 h r igni icant fluctuations in variou categori a ar indica ed by as erisk..
PI no e hat while we h d only 199 fires in structur s
v hi 1 s, our exposur s of prop rty pot n i 1 loss wa s 8 1m
ov r $250,000,000.00, while our c u 1 es im t d loss w 8 sliqh ly ov r $200,000.00.
Sine
I ( .
• 'H
11 /ma Fire Chi
c •
nd
t
only • •
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
0 I•
·. •
Fire Prevention
1973 1974 1975
In-Company Inspections ....... 11484 11342 11460 Foll-ups by Bureau ........... 196 136 95 Reviews of New Construction ..• 183 77 5 En forcement Inspection with
Building Department ........ 151 264 32
TOTAL INSPECTIONS ............ 21061 11819 11592
Arson Bureau (May through December 1975)
F~res Referred to Bureau for Investigation .. .........••.... 23
Proven Arson Fires • . • . • • . • . • . • • • • . . • • • . • . . • • • • . . . . . . • . . . . . . . 13
Cleared Arson (Juvenile-No Court Action) ••....•..•....•..... 3
C leared Arson (Adult-Resulted Court Action) ••••.••.. ....•••. 3
St ucture Arson Cases Open.................................. 2
Suspected Arson 1 Structure 1 Cases Open • • . • • • • • . • • • . • . . . . . . . . 4
Vehicl Arson Cases Open • . . • • • • . . • . • . • • • • • • • • • . • . • . . . . . • • . . . 2
Suspicious Trash Fires-Cases Open......................... 3
Un nown Causes . . . . . • . . • • . • . . • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • . . • • • • . . . . . . . . 1
tructure Fires Cleared by Investigation-No Arson........... 5
Cas Carry-over . . . . • • . • • • . . • • . • • • . . . • • • • . • • . • • . • . . . . • . . . . • • • • 12
Cases Clea red • . . . . . . . . . . . • • . . • • • . • • • • . • . • . • . . • . • • • • . • . . • . • . . 11
Clearance Rate . • . . . . . . . • • . . . • • • • • • • • • • . • . • . • • . • • • • . . • . • . . . . . 41%
C s s Involving Known Organized Crime ••••..•.••.•.....•....• 1
1 C s s Involving 0 he Crimes .••....•.••••..••••.•.......•...
Training S sions
M n A nd1ng .•.•••• ......................
r ining Hou rs •.•.
Training
168 •••••••· 277
11389 •••.•••• 2,479
51578 •••••..• 9,640
of hos us d. • . • 4 7, 670 ••.•••• 50,000
15
..•..•. 2,0 0
• .•.•.. 610 48
9,988
• •..•• 41,100
• •
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
,. -
F I R E D E P fi R T M E N T
Fire Calls
197 3
lv1 tnin City Limits ................. 692 Fire in Building ................. 32 Fin: in Mo tor v hic1e ............ 74 Fir.:. ln Ru bbis h or Brush ......•.. 96 Other Fires Outd oors ............ 31 Pals Jll rms ..................... 77 Alarmu Whe r e There Was No Fi re ... 28 2
\\'i hin Cherry Hills District 0
Wi t hin Coun y ..................... 5
W1th 1n Denver Fire District ........ 1
Within Lit tleton Fire District ..... 1
Within She r id an Fir District ...... 4
TOTAL FIRE CALLS ANSWERED .......... 70 3
Rescue Ca lls
W1th1n 1..:1ty L1m1 s ...•...•••..••...
In jury .......••...•......••.•
Home •••••....•.•.••••.••.•.•
P bl1c .....•...•.•.•••....••.•
Indu rial ..•......•..........
Au 0:10 i 1 .....•.•.•.•.•.••.••
Il1nes ......•...••...•..••.•..•
11111 Dis net ....
941
4
102
149
17
212
464
103
52
278
31
38
8
1
1
10
5
----
197 4
72 6
107
53
131
30
292
113
3
0
0
0
3
732
.....• 1 ,118
;,41
1 24
165
37
208
57
1 0
28t:
83
41
9
0
II
3
137~
927*
116
83
SOil
35
181#
435 *
1
0
2
2
1
933
•..... 1, no
645 ..
H2
147
13 ..
01
6:.!2
9
l s*
l27
1
so
5
0
2
7
TO't L RESCUE CALLS 0 ••.•..• 1 ,00 7 .....• 1 ,13 ...... 1 ,3 7
I . CALLS ov r 1 74
a 7
,. .
• •
,
• -
-
1975 FIRE AND RESCUE CALLS BY DISTRICTS
1 2 3 4 CHFD DFD LFD SFD
Fire 539 58 247 83 1 2 1 Rescue 835 57 323 85 5 2 7 3
TOTAL 1374 115 570 168 6 4 9 4
I Total Fire -933 Englewood Only 927 Total Re scu e -1317 Eng l ewood Only -1300
I TOTAL F IRE AND RESCUE CALLS RESPONDED T0-2250
I
I -~~~ T
I
•
1-
I
I
I
I
I
• I
I
• I
I
I
•
0 I •
•
In 1975 the Englewood Fire Department, under the direction of
William A. Hamilton, Fire Ch~ef, organized the first authenticated
fire investiga ion bureau. Conceived as an arm of Fire Prevention,
11 investigators were struc ured eparate from Fire Prevention ,
yet under th authority of th~s office . Captain Ed White was in
charge of Fir Prevention a th~ · time.
Upon Captain White's retirerecnt, Captain Ron Boston became head of
Fire Prevent~on. DOE Cl~fford Selby remained acting lead fire
invest1ga or. Two other inves ~gators were assigned on a shift
concept. Loui cKay, ftcft sh1 f , was assigned on a volunteer basis.
Walt Groditski was assign d on ftB' shift through testing, as "B"
shif had multiple volunteer ap licants.
Two of the
of Denv r, s
training has b en establish
Bureau. Four m n have been d
Departm nt Arson S minar, sch
Overt~m ha
all cases hav
bureau are students at Community College
a~ ociat degrees. Inter-department
w ~h the Denver Fire Department Arson
a d o train at the Denver Fire
uled for February 1976.
fl.r inv sti-
crime r port-
th Unit d
40-hour
rag •
• •
,
-
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
0 I •
•
. ~ .· .
YEAR END REPORT FOR 1975 ARSON BUREAU
This report will cover May 1975 through December 1975. This is
due to the fact that the bureau concept did not come into being until May.
Following is a breakdown on act i vities:
Fires turned over to bureau f or investigation
Proven arson fires
Cleared arson -Juven~le -No court action
Cleared arson -Adult -Resul ed court action
Structure arson -Cases open
Suspected arson -structur -Cases open
Vehicle arson -Cas s open
Suspicious trash fires -Cas .s open
Unknown causes
Structure fires cl ared by investigation -No arson
TOTAL
Case Carry Over
Cas s Cle r d
Cle ranc r t
Cal involv1ng known o n z c r
Cas 1 Involving o h r cri
23
13
3
3
2
4
2
3
l
5
23
12
_!!__
23
41
1
1
•
'
• •
I ~~-
.._, __
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
0 I•
•
ANNUAL TRAINrNG REPORT FOR 197 5.
SCHEDULED TRAINING SESSIONS: 156
MEN ATTENDING: 2080
TOTAL SCHEDULED HO URS: 6048
UNSCHEDU LED TRAINrNG HO URS: 9 8
Ha:lE USED IN TRAINING: 5''---620ft. 2~ ''---23, 530ft. 1 ~ "---8950ft.
TRAIN IN G FOR ALL PERSO NFL: D. F. D. HIGH RISE
PHYSICAL FITNESS OF AM E RICA
PRACTICE AND BURN HO USES
A TO EXTRICATION COURSE
TEACHING TECHNIQ UES FOR SUPERVlSORS
FOl'R -STEP LESSON PLANS
IIELT COPTER EMERGENCIES
S.M. C. & CR&I G PRE-PLANS
C. C . MAPS & P R E-PLANS
EW NOTEBOOKS
S.M. C. ZON B MAPS
SCHOOLS ATTENDED; COLORADO HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SAFETY SEMINARS
E 1ERGENCY 1EDICAL TECHNICIAN
PARA-MEDIC
MISCELLANEOUS: PREPLANNING
NEW FORMS
ASSlSTED L. F. D. WITH EXAMS
INSPECT!
PROBATI ARY TE T
UNIFORM INVENTOR
PARA-1EDIC PR GRA
A TED A. F. 0. WITH EXA f
DISTRlB TED NEW
W -or. II E TPLOY TRAINING
C 'O};RF.LLA CITY PR( RA
CH L DRILLS
C.C. HYDRA 'T URVEY
S. C. THR.f::A SU V Y
fiR Pl E\'f_ 10. W K
ATT D .0:
lAL OJ J> 0--
CUTrv
'
• •
-
' i
' I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
0
•
1975 A. NUA L REPORT
P UBLIC WORKS DE PARTMENT
En g i neering Div i sion
The En g i nee r ing Divis i on prov i de s a dministrative guidance to the
str e et and drai nage , e n gi n ee r i n g , traff i c control, and central
garage (S ervicente r ) functions of the City i n addition to pro-
vieing for the Ci t y's engine e r i n g se r v ~c e s. The Engineering Divi-
sion rev iews and app r oves al l pl ns f o r improvements of a public
nature, exc epting ma j o r e n g in eer~ng pro j ects, and inspects the
cons r uc t i on of s u ch improvements w i t h~n the jurisdiction of the
ty. The Division also s urveys, de s igns, inspects, and adminis-
ters t h contracts f or capital ~mpro v ements undertaken by the City,
1n addition to assis ~ g u ~lity and p ark adm~n istrators. The o~vis1on m a in t a~ns maps, plan s and o the r records of publ i c improv -
ments , prep res es t ima es and asses sment rolls for public improve-
nents , and perfor ms additiona l engineer i n g servi ces as required.
The Engineering Div~sion was in respon s i b l e charge of Pav i ng ois-
rlc o. 22 consisting of a n equiva l e nt o f 19 long blocks of
s reet construction,which b r ough us to a o tal of 110.2 3 miles
of paved str ee t s i n Engl wood. Approx imate ly 4.12 mi les o f gravel
streets still remain .
Th n 1neer~ng Division provided plans nd specificat i ons f or
8 1,156 squar y rd of sealcoat wh1ch was com le ed und r pr~vate
co tr ct in July of h~s ye ar.
r
Ar
pl
nd Br~dge mill levy , f u n d s w r
sph alt in o n e-nd wo-inch o v r-
ss sur c s on s r eets whlch, hrou h
'l i i s or norm d t r io r a 1on ,
'
• •
•
•
0 ..
-2-
The largest i ncrease in this divisi on's work load in 1975 was
due to the assistance given the Parks Department in the construc-
tion of new parks additions.
Traffic Division
r -
The respons ibili ty of the Traffic Division is to make traffic
studies, supervise and install and maintain traffic signal equip-
ment; maintain, cons truct and install regulatory and warning signs;
maintain and cons truct street name signs, and to do necessary street
paint1ng throughout the City .
everal of our span wire signal installations had to be changed
to "box type " installations be c ause the necessary clearance
between the ro dway and signal heads could not be maintained. It
is our obJective to r vise all of the span wire installations where
we are having clearance problems.
Several new 1nstallation s and re-designs were accomplished as follows:
1. Elati and Tuf ts -re-desiqned as a mid-block pedestrian
cross1ng
2. Cl rkson and Eastman -installed as a mid-block pedes-
trlan c rossing •
3. Belleview and Ha wthorne -i nsta lled as a mid-block pedes-
rlan crossing
4 . Huron nd Chenango -re-d signed as a mid-block pedestrian
crossing
5. u.s. 285 and G1lpin -ins talled a new signal
6. B 11 view nd Clarkson - 1 nstalled a new signal
1. Acorn nd G1r rd -signal r moved
B. Acoma nd Floyd -s1gnal remov d
ch nged from a on -way stre t to a two-
d n Avenu w s closed to w stbound mov -
This 1 t r ch ng allow d us mor
nock by th elimin t on of a thr
ph sea.
11 wood Dr v
y to o-w y.
• •
•
0 ..
-3-
Servicenter
The Servicenter Garage provides general repair, maintenance, stor-
age parking, fuel servicing and tire repair for all City equip-
ment and vehicles.
In general, the Servicenter shop area provides a working area for
all departments in the City. In addition to that, the Servicenter
Carpentry Shop provides custom wood work, additions to, and new
construction in City-owned facilities; the Servicenter Metal Shop
provides metal repairs, custom fabrication, repairs to vehicles
and equipment; and the Servicenter Plumbing Shop provides plumb-
ing and heating repairs, lawn sprinkler system installation and
repairs, light electrical installations and repairs, new installa-
tions and building maintenance repairs.
The Servicenter Administrative function oversees and administers
duties of the four Servicenter shops in scheduling work projects,
building maintenance repairs and new construction; co-ordinates
vehicle and equipment use with all City departments; researches
vehicl and equipment specifications and prices to assure best
quality; co-ordinates and works with Central Stores on inventory
~terns and procedures to ensure best quality merchandise.
The Serv~c nter Administrative function is now in the process of
helping put together a Capital Equipment Replacement Fund to ensure
replacement of older equipment the City now has.
Building Maintenance
This d~vision provides for complete janitorial service for the
City Hall and Parks buildings, and all but Fire Station No. 1 of
the new Police/Fire Center. The personnel in this division are
also responsible for setting up chairs for meetings and other mis-
cellaneous duties connected with the use and repair of these build-
ings.
Senior Surrey
to provide a
rvic to
nd older,
qe, iaola-
• cur ny
Surr y,
ny
rawal
unity
'
• •
1
]
I
I
I
I
•
0 -
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1975 ANNUAL REPORT
Street Divn. Operations
Supervisory
Snow & Ice Removal
Sand Icy Streets
Trash Haul
Dirt Haul & Excavate
Gravel, sand & rock haul
Base & fill haul
Cut out & patching
Drainage c learance
New culverts
Leaf pick up
Pour crac ks
Str t w eping
Lo d r operation
Blad op ration
~ r op ration
uip nt aint n nc
rd aaint nan
Tr
Flu h r op rat on
TOTAL
Hours
3,720
435
1 ,060
756
541
142
1,085
9,885.5
2 ,812
48
12
1,572
3,835
62 .5
2,505.5
239.5
5, 17.75
1,620
1 ,3 5
13
27
3 ,733.75
Quantities
2,646 .64 tons
6,094.5 cu. yd
Miles
13,538
• •
,
•
I• -
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1975 ANNUAL REPORT
Engineering Operations
Street And Alley Cut Permits-------------------190
Curb & Gutter, Walk & Driveway Permits---------124
Traffic Operations
Hours Number '
Street striping 947.5 27,200'
Curb painting 17 200'
Crosswalks painted 470
Signals installed 2 ,731.5 4
Signals removed 66 1
Signal maintenance 4,176 487
I Signs in talled 388.5 218
Signs removed 98 41
I Sign maintenance 1,613.5
Signs pain ted 93.5 720
Signs bak d 299 796
I Counters 79.5
Counter maintenance 7
I Shop main nanc 121.5
Equipm nt maint nanc 150
OU8 1 ,292.5
TOTAL 12 ,551
• •
•
•
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
-
E NGLI:.WOOD PARKS RECREATION DEPAR TMENT
SU MMARY OF 1975 ACTIVITIES
PA RK S DIVISION:
One new park area was complete d in 1975--the Southwest Greenbelt (8. 34
acres ) locate d in the Southwest section of Englewood. The comple ted development
of Romans Park (4. 54 acres located near East Floyd Street and South Race Street)
and the Northwest Greenbelt (1l. 20 acres located in the Scenic View area) in 1975
makes these two a r eas more attractive and functional for th e citizens of E nglewood.
There will be some more pl ayground apparatus and picnic tables ins talled in these
three areas this summer.
Roman s Park con tains four lighted tennis courts, an all-purpose court,
restrooms, a constructe d waterfall in a natural se t ting, flower beds, play
apparatus areas and helte rs constructed like mushrooms. &>th Greenbelts are
land s ca d with a bike and hike trail and play apparatus areas.
The e areas bring Englewood 's rl£>veloped park and greenbelt areas to 99. 79
acres and t he undeveloped ar as to 49 acres. According to the National Park and
R creation Ass iation sta ndard of ten acres for every 1, 000 population, Englewood
1s s hort by 2 3. 12 acr es. Included in the 99. 79 developed acres is th area called
·· llcview West" (7 acres) lying just west of the main portion of lle view Park.
Lind 'r construction by c ity forces for s v ral years, this unique and intere ting
natur l a r ea will be available som tim in early 1977. Featuring a quie t park a rea
w1th many wild flow rs, hrubs and tr , this area will have a nature trail that
will attr.lct ople of all a g es. A combination open shelter house and nature center
will provi a place for sc hool and scout groups to offer 1 ctur sand s lide pre se nta-
tions on wlid flowers, birds, animal , tr es and other natural objects.
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
Parks & Recrea tion Department
Summary of 1975 Ac tivities
Page -2-
•
0
•
;-
rive r. A grant of $100,000 has bee n approved from the Bur e au of Outdoor Re cre ation
to acquire this land.
Also, la s t fall the City Council approved a Capital Improvement budget that
wtll fund two more importa nt park and recreation projects insuring that (1) Englewood
nior Citize ns will have a place to r ecr eate and enjoy their le isure time and (2)
that Eng lewood wi ll contribute its part to beautification of the South Platte River and
pre e rvation of open space .
The Senior Citize n RecreaHon Ce nter is scheduled to be a r e ality by the end
of 1977 making available many various and interesting acti~ities that make life worth
living for our semor citize ns . Chosen by the Englewood Centennial-Bicentennial
Committee as their main project, they ha ve taken the responsibility of raising the
fir s t $100,000 of the n eded $6 00,000 for the Center from community contributions.
The funding of th e River Redevelopment will insure that the City of Englewood
will have a golf course, a river greenbelt , more softball fields and a community
garden learning area for young citizens. The funding of the River Redevelopment is
timely since thts i the only opportunity for Englewood to obtain such a large tract of
land (22 4 acres) that is s o c lose and of sufficient size to enable the city to build these
types of facilitie s.
• •
-
•
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
Park s & Recreation Department
Sum mary of 1975 Activities
Pa ge -3-
•
0 -I•
tennis lessons. The new courts are located at the following sites: Romans Park (4);
Sinc lair Jun ior Hi g h School (4); Flood Junior High School (2); Charles Hay Elementary
School (2 ). The four th ree -wall handball/racquet courts are located at Sinclair Junior
High. The s e handball courts were very popular during the late fall and this should be
even greater this summer when lessons on how to play will be offered.
The Ri ver Redevelopme nt, including a golf course and greenbelt area, plans
w re f inalized during 1975. This facility, when completed, will greatly add to the
recreational program in Eng l e wood. ot only will the golf course be used for play
but lessons and a driving range will be availa ble. This greenbelt area will have
public ga rd ns for yout h to able to learn th e skills of growing food and flowers.
Tllt. gree nbelt area will also provide hiking in a beautiful area. Four blue herons
h ve bee n see n in thi s area ~l ong with a wide variety of wild flowers.
Englewood's e nior ci tizen population is twelve percent and increasing each
~.:a r. he recreation p"'0gram in Eng le wood has not met the needs of this age group.
The Centcnnial-Bicent~"n ial Commi ttee decided that their main project would be one
t help rai e funds forth con truction of a Senior Citizen Recreation Center. When
this building is completed in 1977, the e nior citizens of this community will have a
va t variety of recr ational programs to meet their needs.
clining you h population in Eng! wood has resulted in les s participation in
youth programs . This de r a in 197 5 was about twenty participants in each pro-
gram. Jult pr grams in rca d gr atl in numbers of registrations and participa-
tion.
tlon :
mic ,
•.
• •
,
•
cOil r~hniq,os(Ad .... <ll
c 01 1 ~ecA~iques (Youth)
Art (Adult}
Ar_t (Youth)
.L, I
r )
r}
.. ton ' Acro!»tics
•.8.14.,. t•usiness.an'• Exer-
c1 .. ' Fitness ~
'P (SW.t Ad•l .lnu 1
rrr ..wD
CIJIC : I a.ll•t, ~ap, Jazz
SOelv lll.nce ............. ,.. ...
'inners)~
rrcs il DRieD F'UJf/ERS CLASS
•
•
1973
6J
'NGLEWOOD PARKS ' RECREATIOfl DEPARTMENT
REPOR T OF RECREATION ACTIVITIES
1975
INDIVIDI.JALS ATTENDANCE
REGISTE:RED
l 1974 I l97s 1973 1974 1975
100 130 561 990 1266
-o-I -o-10 -0--0-80
45" 45 43 344 367 375
23 18 7 84 162 66
0 102 147 1370 701 764
J99 452 409 2600 2948 2810
-o-57 72 -0-570 468
106 140 132 4161 3293 1 2836
Jl 44 62 698 789 I 755
447 300 361 3411 2793 3510
-0--o-19 -0--o-153
57 57 57 2193 2429 2180
70 65 110 420 650 770
51 71 lOS 873 780 1048
58 36 76 423 293 592
111 164 92 4065 451.1 4310
(Includ~ in abo } 42 (Incl. n above 699
102 90 65 1284 1084 1614
61 103 62 711 977 842
4J 26 18 358 314 248
51 . 26 -o-413 208 -o-
98 82 91 3600 2792 3283
6 I 16 2 25 133 16
I ...
SPECIAL I TOTAL ATTENDANCE EVENTS
ATTENDANCE
1975 1973 1974 1975
561 990 1266
-0--0-80
344 367 375
84 162 66
130 1538 953 I 894
576 2980 3620 3386
-0-570
388 4436 3681 3224
698 789 755 r ' I 0 •
3411 2793 3510
-0--o-153
171 2193 2429 2321 I ~
440 560 975 1210
56 905 808 1104
423 293 592
4065 4521 4310
(Incl. in abov 699
1284 1084 1614
711 977 842
358 314 248
413 208 -0-
368 3992 3038 3283
25 133 16
,
....._,
• • }j I I
. ------... ----...
lict:ivltles Rt:por t
SPECIAL INDIVIDUALS EVENTS REG I S TERED ATTENDANCE ATTENDANCE TOTAL ATTENDANCE
1973 1974 1975 1973 1974 1975 I 1975 1975
355 2 45 300 4680 5700 6910 4680 5700 6910
LL I -0 -6 4 136 -0-384 816 -0-38 4 816
-o--0-35 -0--0-170 -o--0-170
SAITrY Cl.\SS I 39 25 34 273 21 4 272 273 214 272
·•rr:aw •~•.a Me .
527 4 42 378 9282 5334 8998 20 8 957 5 5568 9206 -o--o-126 -o--o-3154 -o--0-3154
221 214 189 8 484 9004 8348 1 89 8712 9218 9218
174 155 142 6678 6390 54 90 142 6852 6545 5632
-0--o-90 -o--0-2460 -0--0-2460
300 350 380 3300 3500 3800 380 3600 3850 4180
lJ4 239 197 4600 84 37 7905 197 4734 8676 8102
114 103 88 1482 1236 1056 176 1824 1339 1232
Cr;ASS ClASS I I -0--0-80 -o--0-80 -0--0-I I r 0 • 443 'I 419 41 4 7512 6552 6 799 475 7692 7022 7274 I
69 72 1056 1104 1152 1056 1104 1152
15 15 15 300 240 210 300 240 210
15 11 15 405 132 135 405 132 135
3 -0--0-22 -o--0-22 -0--0-I ~
1'1AYCJIOUNDS I 545 4 25 383 7125 8360 7580 625 7125 9690 8205
POt"f'CCtr :
99 174 277 980 1683 2607 980 1683 2607
51 30 20 472 205 170 472 205 170
rr nun -o-52 68 -o-364 408 -0-364 408
,z
r} 4 34 550 576 8344 9298 8806 1940 11,816 1,902 0,746
r} 216 192 167 901 725 564 144 1225 1025 708
91 85 1664 918 1102 240 2028 2206 1342
-0-123 101 -o-1120 1281 -0-123 102
SICIT.c I 96 80 37 678 602 422 894 802 422 I ...
.
,
•
•
• • ---.
on
•I II
J J7}-
~•ge -J-I !NDlVIDUAI.S I I SPECIAL I RECI:;TERED ATTENDANCE: EVENTS TOTAL ATTENDANCE:
ATTENDANCE!
I 1973 I 1974 1 1975 I 19731 1974 1 1975 I 1975 1 1973 I 1974 I 1975
SWII"JfiNC:
Pool
:vct'iOn•l:
i• I 839 I 770 705 8162 7700 6878 8162 7700 6878
368 j 379 362 3645 3786 3512 3645 3786 3512
Cou rse' 14 11 11 52 110 152 52 110 152
142 I 98 156 1404 860 1536 1404 860 1536
1: ...
16,255 13,667 12,527 16,255 13,667 12,527
476 418 3 49 47 88 4128 3362 4788 4128 3362
20 42 21 172 337 303 172 337 303
7 20 14 77 94 74 77 94 74
on 1 166 1 71 181 1605 1810 2538 1605 1810 2538
72 34 61 729 252 610 729 252 610
46 I 38 51 392 302 467 392 302 467 I I .r 0 • 379 320 136 30,266 29,148 20,241 5785 44,074 39,398 26,026 I 179 87 92 2049 709 3943 472 2898 709 4415
12 12 -o-72 128 -0-72 128 -0-
-0-23 25 -o-161 2895 1450 -o-1021 4345
1• I 9791 9185 7967 9791 9185 7967 I -:;
'IS:
Youth 180 166 490 3225 1 1910 I 3490 I 214
I 3459 I 2179
I
3704
Adult . 249 383 356 3723 2254 2742 513 3963 2554 3255
62 49 44 1969 1790 1474 226 2317 2099 1700
'S :
1gh School 310 284 115 . 910 767 217 910 767 217
Sincl •ir Jr. Nigh School 518 259 257 1841 804 810 1841 804 810
nn f'01'S 79 140 1 43 2109 2325 4604 2109 2425 4604
't'OU PAI.'f'I'I.,C -0--o-10 -0--0-78 -0--0-78
ttriCIITLIFf'INC 50 13 -o-909 315 -0-909 315 -o-
VOLLEYBA LL :
n'• -o-112 120 . -0-584" 1164 -0-584 1164 I ~
.en's 141 185 317 . 2045 1367 2931 2045 2367 2931
su-r Co-ed -o-71 66 -o-7'20 460 66 -o-720 526
Winter Co-ed -o-113 211 -o-113 1478 -0-113 2478
'AIS 1'0R 1975 10,163 10,159 10,656 192,10 184,65~196,753 15,571 116.223 206 .366 21? .l,<l
•
J
1
J
J
[
•
•
0
ANNUAL REPO RT
ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY
1975
Th increas in library circulation which began in June of 1974 continued
through most of 1975. However, there was a noticeable drop in ovember
and December. The loss of Jefferson County's circulation of som 650
items affected the D cember count as did th Christmas Eve closing.
Refer nee questions for th year incr ased 10.44 ov r 1974. Th number
of childr n attending library programs incr as d 1 4 and the numb r of
adults, 164. The numb r of childr n completing th summ r r adin
program in r ased lOt.
Th S at Grant for th development of th r sourc c nt r of information
about Englewood made it possibl for th Library to pro res s rapidly in
th ar a of local history and curr nt community information .
ln a
also
Thia
1. City Council agenda s and pack t ar availabl in th Library
to all citizens.
2. Information about elections, pollin plac s, tc. is promin ntly
display d at appropriat tim
3. Information about City gove~ n and local is ue is coll ct d
and giv n to any one who inquire about it.
4 . A special rack wa purcha d for the display of any typ s of
brochure which iv information u ul to local residents.
5. The r atl) xpand d and organized
6. for th Library by
7 .
rou y
d and many libraries in
uniti
Past to
prov d r
ho to
(I th libr
librar a tivitl
t o r ach
library non-u
•
[
•
•
•
Englewood Public Library
Annual Report, 1975
page 2
•
Another State Grant of $7045 was received, for use in expanding services
to the elderly in 1975-76, Materials have been purchased and the program
will soon be underway. Members of the library staff review books or
show films once a month at two nursing homes, as well as maintaining a
rotating collection of books for the residents.
A contract was signed and preliminary work completed for computerizing
the library shelf list . The project, to be completed in early 1976, will
provide a complete current inventory for insurance purposes, and a data
base which can later be used in cooperative projects with other libraries .
A Bicentennial-Centennial reading list of 500 titles was prepared for
cooperation with the Englewood schools' reading project.
Under th sponsorship of the Library Board a Friends of the Englewood
Public Library group was organized in October. The Friends assisted the
Library in participating in the Holiday Parade on November 8 and held an
all-day membership drive at Cinderella City on D cember 6. Response has
been good and the Friends hope to involve many residents in library-related
activities.
The Central Colorado Library System had a seri
to fundin and r ciprocal borrowin • In spit
m nt for reciprocal borrowing increased during
problems have resulted in better under tanding
the libraries in Arapahoe County.
s of problems with regard
of that Englewood's reimburse-
th year. The System's
and more cooperation among
The accomplishments of the year 1975 provid the Library with a firm base
for extending and improving its servic s to the community in the future •
. '
• •
I
[
[
[
1
l
l
Circulation: Library:
Bookmobile:
Media Centers:
Average daily circulation:
Arapahoe County ~:
•
0 -
ENGLEWOOD PUBLIC LIBRARY
Statist~cal Report
Annual Report 1975
191,7 6 (18 • 218)
74,125 (78, 515)
1,941 (2,850)
884 (887)
Library: 33,253 (35,892)
I •
Tota l: 267,852 { 269' 58 3)
Users: 12,705 ( 13,804) Bookmobile: 11' 865 (12,718) Total: 45,118 . {4 8 ,610)
Current computer registration:
Books added: 5,4 35
Books withdrawn: 798
Books in collection: 91,9 74
Records added: 150
Art prints added: 3
8 mm films added: 3
Slide sets added: 9
Pamphlets added: 2,948
10. 257
(5,474)
(1,453)
(87. 337)
(162)
(35)
(0)
(0)
( 1, 746)
Paperbacks circulated:
Records circulated:
Art prints circulated:
8 rnm films circulated:
16 mm films circulated:
Slides circulated:
Sculptures circulated:
23 ,442
4 ,134
588
770
15
150
37
{16,457)
(3 , 736)
{632)
(772)
{ 215 )
{1 41)
CCLS requests: 802 (1,015) Books rec'd: 321 (589) 16 mm films: 0 (214) Xe rox& 197 (147)
Telephone refer nee questions answer d:
Adult: 3,632 {2,610)
Reference questions answ red in library:
Adult: 9,258 {8,594)
Reference questions answered on bookmobile:
Juvenile :
Juv nile:
Total: 3,817 (2,841)
185 (231)
Total: 11,928 {11,434)
2,670 (2,840)
Adul t : 1,923 {1,805) Juv nil
Total: 7,295 {8,182}
5,372 (6,377)
Story Hours: 140 (108) Att ndanc : 1,762 (1,437)
Head Start: 18 ( 1 ) Attendance: 466 {449)
Class Visits: 46 ( 42) Attendance: 1,124 (954)
Adult tin sz 173 ( 139) Attendance: 2,138 (1,775}
Sp cial: 24 ( 27) Att ndanc 1 270 ( 296)
Att ndanc at Media Cent ra: 1,727 ( 1,927}
d with the C ty Treasur r'• office: $ 0,114.89 {48,500,83}
lost booku $ • 211 • ~· (7, lb. O)
lq7 ,02 (1 2 .15)
n: (105.25}
\ ~.50}
(6 13 .65)
(23,1 )
{10, 32.00)
(l o.o )
..
uert r p nt n th unt of $4,571. h d no b l' 31, 19,,
•
l
L
[
[
L
[
L
•
•
•
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT ~ 1975 ACTIVITIES
During the past year two significant events took place. In
the Water Division, the Meadow Creek Dam and Ranch Creek Col~
lection system was finished and placed into operation at a cost
of nearly $3 million. This culminates 21 years of progress in
ensuring a long~term raw water supply for Englewood customers.
This project was a joint venture with American Metal Climax,
with that company paying 55% of the $7.6 million construction.
A joint venture project exists in the Sewer Division, that being
the Bi~City Wastewater Treatment plant construction at a cost of
more than $23 million. The City of Littleton is paying for and
will own one ~half of the 20 million gallon a day treatment capacity.
Federal and State grants will pay 80 % of the total construction
cost.
Construction began in February, with an estimated completion date
of April, 1977 .
The Water Fund balance went into deficit at year's end because of
unbudgeted construction expenditures and settlement of a law suit
connected with the Meadow Creek Dam and Ranch Creek Collection
system project. A 30% rate increase, effective January 1, 1976,
will hopefully bring the fund balance out of a deficit by 1978.
The Sewer Fund balance has been adversely affected by a decline
in housing starts coupled with the cash outlay for the Bi~City
Wastewater Treatment plant construction.
By 1977, the Sewer Fund will need additional revenues, either by an
increase in housing construction or by raising the sewage disposal
charges.
• .
• •
,
•
~
1975-26,5 12
1974 -25,824
1973-24 ,806
972-23,648
1975-t0.335
1974 -10,300
1973-10,296
1972-10,258
p .3% ewe
19'
r-r-~ ~ ~ t __ ~ t
SEWER TAPS
-~---
/
26,200 ---" ,..'
~~ ·-~ v r-
25,800
25,400 I
/ v r-
1--
25,000
2 4 600
'JFMA MJJASOND
ATER TAPS
40
-·· r--
I---,.."
~/ 20
·' .-v // '\. t-. v, v K>.300
80 \ /
K>,260
J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0
1975
1975-3173 84
1974-3124.70
1973-262523
up 1.6% over
1974
1975-3152.66
1974-3478.15
1972 -3082.47
down 9.4% from
1974
1974 ------
SEWAGE TREATED (million gallons)
400
300 r ...... l\
t/ \
~ i"--.. ~ I
~ r-v ~~-
\ v/ v
200
J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0
WATER TREATED (million gallons)
v ~ v / 500
ll 1\
I I ,,
f ~I \r\
// \
300
rv \
/ I'.\
t---/ v 1--::::::.
J "'V J 100
J F M A M J J A S 0 N 0
I •
';
" \
•
1975 ANNUAL REPORT
The Department of Community Development is comprised of three
divisions : Planning, Housing and Redevelopment, and Code En-
forcement. The f unctions of these three divisions are closely
related, each being concerned with the health, welfare and
safe and proper development of the community.
Housing Division
The mphasis in the Housing Division in 1975, was on the 104-
unit ap rtment complex for ld rly citizens to be built under
the Section 8 Feder al program. Approval of HUD was secured
for the project, plans pr par d and alternate sources of
financing were developed. Th climax was reached on December
23, 1975, when c itizens voted four to one to issue General
Obligation Bonds to secur the financing of the project. The
apartment complex is to be built on South Lincoln Street in
the 3300 block on land purchas d by the City and State.
The Division also is partic ipating in the Section 8 Existing
Housing Program, having 25 un1ts approved, and in a city-sponsored
r volving loan fund to r pair and maintain housing units occupied
by eld rly citizens.
The Housing Division works w1th th Housing and Urban Renewal
Authoriti s.
Planning Division
Durin
r port
1. Th
2. Th
cl
3. Th
4.
City Planning and Zoning Commission
six p cial meetings, and at 1 a t
cific lly, th se preparations in-
ollowing ac ions:
R-2-A and R-2-B Two-! mily Resid nc
pr paration and r co ndation
id nee Di trict.
and R-3-B , tulti-family zon
par tion and r comm nda ion of
Di trict.
Indu tr al Di trict.
iv of which ini ia d
Th invol d ar •• hich
or R-2-B which w r con8id r d
i a ion, and in on caa , R-1-C
th ar a which had
con id r d or he
•
-
' •
•
I•
•
-:G-
new R-3 Zone classification. The Commission did not recom-
mend the zoning of the area which had been considered for
R-1-C zoning.
Of the requests initiated by citizens, three requests were not
recomme nded to the City Council, three were recommended to the
City Council, and one was tabled for consideration at the first
Planning Commission meeting in 1976.
5. A second Medium Den sity Zone classification, R-2-C, was
prepared, and scheduled for Public Hearing the first meeting
of the Planning Commission in 1976.
6. A Demolition and House Moving Ordinance was prepared and
referr ed to the City Council with a favorable recommendation,
as w 11 as sev ral amendments to the Definition section
of the Com prehensive Zoning Ordinance.
7. Amendments to the Master Street Plan were considered and
r ferr d to the City Council.
8. ProJects for the 1976-1977 Highway Department Work Program
wer developed.
9. A Fiv -Year Capital Improvement Program was considered in
d e tail and a list of priorities referred to the City
lanager.
10. Two Planned Development applications, three Subdivision
W iv rs, and one alley vacation were approved by the Com-
mi sion, nd two street and alley vacations were denied.
Oth r mat onsid red by the staff and Planning Commission
in lud d Stat Land Use Bil l, H.B. 1041. and the location
of th Park an d Ride fa ili i s, and the A.R.T. station location.
Th f has prov id d r s arch, graphics and other information
for th Housin Divi ion as well as the Board of Adjustment and
App 'al s , and graphics for m ny of the other City departments.
In addition, h aff provides information to the general public
and !or oth r City d p rtm nts relative to all matt rs with
which th p rtm nt works. The taff also ke p land use and
?Onin curr nt.
Cod
nforc s all s ctions of th
, Buildin Code, Fir Cod ,
tric 1 Cod , Jlou movin and Demolition
od , F nc Co d , Hou in Code, Noi Control
r mi ·c 11 n ou nvironm n al and nui anc
d v ion a l o works closely with th Board
App al .
'
• •
•
0
A summary of the inspec t ions made, notices issued and construction
undertaken is attached.
•.
• •
-
•
•
0 ,,
•
CODE ENFORC EMl..NT DIVISION -1975
Contractor Licenses ...
Miscellan eo us Revenue .
Mobile Home Inspections.
Use Tax.
TOT AL .
IN SPI:.CTIONS:
NEW CONSTRUCTION.
HOUSING CODE.
~lOB I LE HOME PAR SPACES
WREC KING YARDS.
TOTAL
NOTICES ISSUED:
1973
.$ 33,345
1 ,176
2,961
._2_5~2Ql
.$296 ,635
7,241
<196
'3 ,140
__ 2_!5
11 ,092
CORRECTION ANO STOP ORDERS. 251
ILLEGAL USE . . . . 81
LICE SES AtlO PERMITS. 83
Ll TTER. . . . 2 ,..'!_29
TOTAl 2,84~
CONTACTS WITH OTHER DEPARTME TS AND AGENCIES 300
COMPLAINT I V£STIGATIONS . 1 ,742
PROPlRTIES CLEA ED BY CITY 97
COtTRACTO LICl SES ISSUED 953
-CO OR I USES (GIST( [0 .
TS FilED
M (T II ATTE lOfD .
ll S TRAV L D •
327
142
20
5,810
1974
s 34.190
904
2,872
1_34 .JQ7_
$172,673
G,7 40
358
3 ,1(17
33_6
10,541
227
53
3~
~668
1. 82
310
1 ,188
41
73
355
81
200
J1.773
1975
s 32,338
995
2,901
J-!_._674
S130.90 S
8 ,649
322
3 ,363
292
12.626
77
80
71
2, 68
2 ....
352
1 ,050
so
52
325
85
227
~.UJ • •
I
" ""' -
:1 ---~ .. --•
I -~ -·-----~ ------·-----
CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION -1975 (
\
PERMITS ISSU~O ~Q.I LDl ~GS CONSTRUCT[~
).?LJ 197 4 1975 }.971 lV~ l Q75
Apa r lr.len t Bu 11 d i nqs 1 l. 0 l 2 I)
P.P~idcoti~l Buildings 36 1! 22 36 17 21
P.ut1dtngs 9 8 1 9 8
Buitdioq:; 43 26 11 52 26 13
ic ip.s l Cuil dl nljs -7 2 -12 2
lldinQ!o 89 60 36 98 65 37
iSS 185 180 56 71 59
Additions 12 6 10
Hri•l Additions 21 15 11
icfPc11 Ad ditions -1 1 ---r I 0 •
Scl'loo 1 Add it i o
Total -Remode l ing 218 207 203 56 71 59
~
£1ectrical 633 605 524
Plumbing 36& 303 265
eattng -Atr Conditionina 423 382 330
vtng and Demolit ion 56 65 16
Sign> 7.8 91 125
\Scelhneous (fenc es etc;.) 767 710 893
lot~l -5ubcontr•cts 23?5 ~17 6 2153 I '-
GRAflO TOTAL 2632 2443 2392 154 136 96 I
,
• ~
•
I
') "en ,
--------
1 ---
..
----·---·------------
•• r
CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION -1975 (
PER11_l_T FEES ~ONSTRUCTION COST
19 73 1974 12Ii 1973 1974 1975
11 u1 ng:o ~ 1 ,012 s 573 s 0 t 88!>,8 82 $ 320,242 $ 0
~es i ~e n t i al Bui lding ~ 2 ,77 6 1 ,1166 1 ,838 786 ,168 415,790 415,785
Bull dings 1 ,02 0 2,121 29 351 ,215 1 .168,520 5,000
Industrial 8u11 d 1ngs 10,752 4,142 1,359 6 ,675,290 1,800,353 429,855
n1c1pa1 Buildings -~Fee No Fee -209,(314 20,066,000 -----
To t al -tiew 81dg s .$ 15,560 $ 8,302 $ 3,226 $ 8 ,698,555 \ 3,914,719 $ 20,916,640
ditions 2 ,81 6 2.96 1 2,893 344 ,133 392 ,4 91 362,933
C~e~c i al Add1tions 1',3 87 62 8 892 681 ,880 320,638 252,130
Industria l Additions 2 ,1 59 2,650 682 867,690 1,683,744 16 7,815
1cipal Add i t i ons No Fee No Fee 12,706
r I 0 • --6,200
Schoo 1 Addit ion --126 --40,000 I
To ta l -Remod . s 6,362 s 6,239 $ 4,593 $ 1,893,703 $ 2,409,57 9 $ 82 9,078
'";
E1ectnca1 6,810 5,927 5,815 1 ,477,083 1 '112 ,895 2,486,328
Pluming 5,977 3 ,682 2,612 1,089,098 948,349 307,470
Heating -Air Cond . 7,127 9,279 6,400 1,557,110 2,651,971 1,259,001
v1ng and 0emo 11t1on 558 308 64 85,425 74,293 17,140
Signs 533 580 792 51 ,440 54,890 66,296
lscellaneous (Fences etc.) 9,982 10.61S 11 ,879 _1_,645 ,62~ 2,296,226 ~235,928
-
Tota l -Subcontracts $30,987 s 30,394 $ 27,562 $ 5,905,779 $ 7 '138,624 $ 6 ,3 72,163 f -'-
GRANO TOTAL $52,909 s 44,935 s 35,381 $16.498,037 $13,462,922 $ 28,117,8(31
I
• .. --
•
]-
. . ... .
(
•
Ci ty Council
•
0
•
OFF I CE OF ST AT E A UDITOR
SUI T£ :'4\0, 1 660 LINCOlN SlA((l
DENVER , COLOR AD O 8V20l
Oe cemoer 22, 197 5
City of Englewoo d
3400 South Elati
Englewood, Colorado 80110
Gentlemen:
, .
3~ -
Re : #689
We have reviewed the audit r pn Yt of the City of Englewood for the
year ended December 31, 1974, prepared by Van Schooneveld & Company,
Certified Public Accountants .
In reviewing the report we note that the expenditures of the Gen ral
Fund exceeded its appropriat ion. Since, a the uditors hav pro-
perly pointed out, s pend ing in exc ss of amount budgeted and appro-
priated may be a viola tion of th City chart r, we would appr ciate
your conunents on this matt r.
We noted th~t the R v enu Sharing
titlcmcnt payment of $1 56,720 r c iv d 1n
Furth r, Note 2 of the Not to Financial
Sharing Fund indicates th t revenu ar r
the Trc a ury's ch k. We b liev th t thi
niz d at y ar end in accordance with th r
Municipal Finance Officers A sociation in it
ing Sy tom for R v nue Sharing." Al
C rtifi d Publ c Ac ountants in th ir
July 31, 1975, hav 1ndicat d that th
r v nu ptibl to ac rual.
V r truly y ur
J tT/dl'l
('C : v n · ho
i'l v l n
; I
the en-
1974.
{ ... ,.--
•.
'
• •
'
(
•
•
•
ShcphC'I'd and Compan~: Inc .
CC.A"T if"lf 0 PUBLIC A CCOUNTANTS
A PAO.,f':•&•U N ... t.. CO .... O ...... T>ON
S v•te 703 · F1ra t Nat•onal Bank. Buddtng · n gl w oo a , Colo ,.ado 80110 1303) 761 ~6733
Mr. James M. Tinsley, CPA
Deputy State Auditor
Office of State Auditor
Suite 2410
1660 Lincoln Street
Denver, Colorado 80203
Dear Mr. Tinsley:
February 10, 1976
This letter is to follow up on a telephone conversation which we had
approximately three weeks ago concerning your letter dated D cember 22,
1975 to the City Council of the City of Englewood. To refresh your
recoll ction of that call, I informed you that I didn't understand the
comme nt about th overexpenditure of th general fund. On page 23 of
the report, you will note that the total xpenditures and encumbrances
for th y ar nd d D cember 31, 1974 were $5,400,605. The total ap-
propriations w r $5,443,929.
There was, how ver, an over xp nditur in the Water Utility Fund (page 51).
W made ntion of this item in our report. Because this item waa not
ntion d in your 1 tter, is th r a pos i ility of a typographical error
as to th fund involv d?
A to your co nt about th accrual of r v nue sharin funds , the city
dministration h b n i nf ormed of this r quir m nt for so ti and
will cru th ntftl m nt p ym n s forth curr nt y ar .
1 would appr
r vi w d th
th qu
a dvise
cia t it if you would h v th p rson in your offic
City of En 1 wood's 1974 audit repor t cont ct to
th ov r xp nditur of appropriations to nabl
approprfat r pon
Your a very truly,
A OMPANY, 1 c . ,
who
clarify
to
''.t) ~ . ,.
Lor n D. ph rd
Pr: a d nt
{I • 1
Kr. WI 111 •
Fin n D ityo d
.. QtiN1 ANra .. AC 0 , .. ,
• .
_,
• •
(
City of F.nglewood
Febru ary 26, 19 76
Mr . J ame s M. Tin s l ey, CP A
Dep ut y State Audi to r
St ate of Colo ra do
Sui te 2410, 1660 li nco ln St.
De nve r, Co lo r ado 80203
Dear Mr. Tins l ey:
•
0 ,. -
3400 S Elah Street
Engt wood , Colorado 80110
Phone (303) 761 -1140
The City of Englewood has received your letter dated December 22, 1975 ,
regarding the City 's 1974 Annual Financial Report. Your letter was forwarded
to Shepherd and Company , Inc., the City's present auditing firm. loren D.
Shepherd , President of Shepherd and Co tr.p<lny, Inc , r espo nded to your inqui ry
on February 10, 1976.
The purpose of my letter is to further clarify the questions addressed in
your letter. The over-expenditure of appropriati on hich you stated was in
the General Fund is actually in the Water Fund (page 51), which the auditors
so noted in the report. The City's Home Rule Charter intended that all budgets
be prepared on a cash basis . Th e City's accounting system is on an accrua l
basis. Last year during the month of December t e City received a billing for
the Ranch Creek Project. This particular invoice was in excess of the antici-
pated total contract cost, approximately $60,000. he auditors decision was
that since this invoice had been rec ived prior o Decembe r 31, 1974 the amoun t
s a ted a ove should be refl cted as an expenditure in 1974 rather than 1975.
In this instance the ti ming was such that no af'! n me nt co uld b de to he
.udge t for the accrual of thi expe nditure. I w ld like to re-phasize that
the Ci ty 's budget is prepar d basically on a cas basis , and that it would
have en properly accoun ed for in 1975. Considering the abov facts, it
is my determina ion that the City did no viola e he City Char er.
In r g rds o e receip of revPnue sharing n itlt'll",ent payme nts, the City
tll ecru ra nts as you no ed in your letter.
'
]-
(
•
Mr. James M. Tinsl ey, CPA
Fe bruary 26, 1976
Page 2
•
0
•
If yo u have any further (juestion s, pl ea se do nCtt hPsitate to contact ne or loren Shephe rd.
Sincerely,
h/,/t6-~ -William~
Director of Finance/Ci ty Clerk
cc: City Council
City Nanager lkCo1m
loren Shepherd
WDJ/kv
•
• •
,
-
(
•
TO.
•
0
•
INTR-OMcl
MIMOit-+JIIDUM
Andy McCown, City Manager
•
~ Kells Wa ggoner
DA~ February 25, 1976
ANU~, U.S . 285 (Hampden Avenue)
Attached is a copy of the "Hampden Avenue Capacit Study"
which wa s prepared for t h e Colorado Division of Highways
by Centennial Engineering, Inc.
The report recaps the existing conditions (g ometrics, sign~ng, signalizat~on and turning moves) along U.S. 285
and shows the number and type of accidents which have occurrea.
In Augus of 1975, this sec ion of u.s. 285 was carrying
45,700 vehicles per day, wj h a charac eristic eekday peak
of 3,990 vehicles per hour. During he per~od from July, 1974,
through June, 1975, there were 298 acc~den s, and over a three-
year period, the total estimated economic loss created by acc1dents was $1,549,400.
The standard des1gn criteria is based upon a traff~c flow
at wh the c pacity manual defines as "lev 1 o s rvic C".
Th only tim th t U.S. 285, in this area, is a or below
lev 1 C is dur~ng the evening hours. The consul ant
ha today's volum s xceed normal design t nd rd
traffic durin he peak hour in reases approxim tely
th s1gn ls nd g om tries rema1n as hey re
ill b com stop-nd-go, w~th consid rabl d lay;
ch m ximum c pacity at "1 v 1 of ervice E",
will incr as .
The repor recommend hre cat gori s 0 chang s:
1. 0 r 18 s nt wi h pro bays
2. Spo ch ng • 1n &lgtung nd g om trtce
3. R viei n of ugn 1 m1n nd progr seion p t rna
Th m di n woul n o a uch low nd l1m1n the ona . •
]
•
•
, .
•
Andy McCow n, C~ty Manger -2-F bruary 25, 1976
closure of the med1an at Dry Creek Shopp~ng Center and at
South Marion Street; and a possible median opening at
Lafayette, depending on h dcvelopmen a the Larwin site.
The major signal revisions and progression t~ming would
require digital-type controllers and could not be instituted
with our present setup, even though we agree with some of
the suggested changes.
Some of the minor changes suggested by the report are being
i mple mented and som of the changes wil l, of course, have
to be coordinated with concerns othe r than the State and City.
We would, however, like to have yours and Council's comments
prior to asking the S ate to budget monies for some of the
changes or before we push for any of the changes, regardless
of who pays.
Sincerely,
1{@... ~..J-~-
Kells Waggoner
Director of Public Works
KW/1
Attach .
'
• •
;f~-"
I
I
I .
•
0 -
Hampden
Avenue
r:J I
'-
•
---
1--
•
•
•
•
CENTENNIAL ENGINEERING, INC .
11445 WEST 48TH AVENU , WHEAT RIDGE , COLORADO 80033, (303) 420-0220 I
II
II
I
II
January 6,· 1975
Mr . E. N. Haase, Chief Engineer
Colorado Division of Highways
2000 South Holly
Denver, Colorado 80222
Attention:
Gentlemen:
Mr. R. J. Brasher
District Engineer Re: CSl0-0285-05
In Englewood
CEI 5028
The accompanying report presents the results of the operational study and
the recommendations for improvement of Hampden Avenue from Gilpin Street
on the east to Santa Fe Drive on the west.
The data presented herein was derived from time lapse filming and field
studies. The signal system was analyzed, accident data wa s studied, and
the geometries of the street w re studied.
The results of these studies made possible the recommendations in the re -
port to increase the capacity and vehicular flow hrough the corridor using low cost construction techniques .
Th members of your staff, the City of Engl od nd of 1cials of Cinderella
City were most coop rativ in helping us with factual data, comments and
suggestio ns . We are most grate ul and appr ci ive for their assistance.
Very truly your ,
CE TE IAL E GI HRI G, INC.
q~ n~~/!/
Ex cu lv Vic Pre 1d nt
s-
r por
•
•
'
• •
]-
I\
I
II
II
I
I
II
I
I
I
•
•
0 t•
•
HAMPDEN AVENUE CAPACITY STUDY
us 285
FOR
THE COlORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BY
CENTENHIAL ENGINEERING , INC.
11445 WEST 48th AVENUE
WHEATRIDGE , COlORADO 80033
'
. . .
• •
-
-I
I
.I
I
••
I
I
•
•
0 -
HAMPDEN AVENUE CAPACITY STUDY
This report describes the analysis of traffic flow and result~nt con-
ceptual redesign of a section of Hampden Avenue which passes through the
City of Englewood from Santa Fe to Gilpin. The section is essentially six
through lanes with separate left turn bays and right turn lanes. Traffic
flow on the section has been experiencing severe congestion with a corres-
ponding large number of accidents. In August, 1975, this section of Hampden
was carrying 45,700 vehicles per day .. During the three year period from
July 1, 1972 through July 1, 1975 there were 925 accidents, resulting in one
fatality and 269 injuri es. Total estimated economic loss was $1,549,400.
Previous consulting studies have recommended major reconstruction and
realig nme nt of the section as the only means of alleviating the problem,
however, the Col or ado Division of Highways does not have sufficient funds to
implement any major re co nstruction program . The purpose of this study, there -
fore, was to prepare recomnendatfons f or redesign and recon stru c tion which
would increase the capacity of the veh icular flow using low cost co nstru ction
t chniqu s.
BACKGROUND
The study area, along H mpden Av nue, is bounded on the west by Santa Fe
Avenue and on th st by Gilpin (s Ffgure 1). H mpden Av nue is jor
ast-w rt rial that p ss th ugh 0 nv r, rn 1 od and a nu r of oth.r
c n t south port ton of ro ar • H pd n, hrough th
study r a, is he d signa d rout for US 285 a fs on of th f east-st
art rial outh of 6th .A i contfnuou fo any appr ciabl distance.
\ .
•
J-
II
I
I
I
II
I
I
:l
Cinderella
Ci t y
N
Hampden Ave.
us 285
Office V
& Commercial
Centra l Bu siness District
•
0
•
Englew oo d
H1'h
School
. H mpden Study Ar
IC , 1
Medical
Center
Multi-family
Residen t ia I &
Off ice De elopment
0
• •
1
]
•
Because of its locat i on, and the lack of other east-west arterials, Hampden
attracts a large number of commuter trips during the morning and evening peaks
as well as a substantial volume of business trips throughout the day.
This portion of Hampden also serves as the major access route to Cinder-
ella City, a regional shopping center, and to the Englewood central business
district. During the mi d-day and on we ekends, shopping trips on Hampden pre-
dominate and at some intersecti ons more than 20 percent of the volume is turn-
ing moves. The traffic problem is further compounded by the location of
Flood Junior High School and Englewood High Sc hool immediately south of Hampden .
These schools are major generators of both vehicle and pedestrian trips on and
across Hampden.
land use along the right-of-way is over 90 percent developed and varies
from single and multi-family housing on the east near Gilpin to commercia l and
industrial on the west near Santa Fe. This development has resulted in numerous
curb cuts for driveway openings and alleys which are major contributo rs to
interruptions in flow as w 11 as accident generators. Because of the extensive
lane used velopment, availability of additional right-of-way for widening
H den is limit d and in many cases unavailable.
S ARY
The remainder of this report is divfd d into two sections, the first dealing
wt h th xis ing situa lon at th ti t da a w coll c d during the fall
of 1975, and t pl ns of ro os d c a ges. Th
o cal ; t y a con ptual and convey
• •
]-
• I
•
•
0
•
The proposed changes fall into three categories:
1) Construction of a raised barrier median from Santa Fe to Bannock
with protected left turn bays;
2) Revision of the signal timings and progression patterns of all sig-
nal intersections in the study area;
3) Spot changes in signing and geometries at locations which had high
accident rates or where traffic flow was interrupted.
I ....
•.
..
• •
2
.......
•
•
..
EXISTING SITUATION
Sketch plans showing the existing situation during the fall of 1975
are contained in this section. There are two sets of plans. Each set of
sketch plans contains five sheets of drawings. The first set shows the ex-
isting geometries, signing, signalization, and turning moves at locations
which were identified as points requiring design changes . The ·second set
shows the accident diagrams for all accidents occurring between Santa Fe
and Downing in the twelve month period from July, 1974 thru June, 1975.
From Santa Fe on the west end of the study area to Gilpin on the east,
the character of Hampden changes considerably . The intersections of Santa
Fe and Broadway with Hampden are grade Jc1·arated interchang es. The re mainder
of the intersections are at grade. From Inca east to Bannock th e roadway
section is es sentially six lanes with left turn bays and a pa i nted me di an.
The section from Bannock east to Sherman has a rai se d barrier med i an and is
four lanes; two lanes are dropped through the Broadway interchange. From
Sherman on ea s t to Gilp i n, Ha mpden is six lanes with left turn bays and a
rai s ed barri er med i an . The re a r e tw e lv e si gnal i nter sec t io ns i n the study
area . This i s hown i n considerabl e deta il on t he "Existi ng " set of
dra wi ngs wh ic h f ollow.
Da ta Coll ec t ion
Th e f ield data was coll cted dur ing Augus t , September and Octobe r , 1975.
Th traffic c dent dat nd count Inform tfon was collect d by th Colorado
Division of Highw ys with s uppl n al inters ion an lysis and turn1 g mov s
ade by h Con ultant . Th City of Engl ood prov1ded rnapp1ng and air p otos
of t h corridor , tr f ie sign 1 and controll r in or lion, nd historical
d t cone rni ng p t rn o flow and probl reas.
/ .
•
•
•
II
I
I
I
•
-
The Consultant collected additional data by means of an extensive field
investigation program which identified sections of interrupted flow and
problem areas. After the locations were identified, time lapse photography
was used to collect information at the site during the times the problems
were occurring. The time lapse film was analyzed and causes of the problem
identified. Analysis of the film proved to be a valuable tool because re-
peated viewings of the film enabled the design team to separate all the many
events occurring at a n intersection, isolate those which created problems,
and devise appropriate design solutions.
Depending upon the traffic characteristics under investigation, sites
were filmed at either one frame per seco111..l or at two frames per second.
Generally, if turning move and cycle time informatio n was needed, the inter-
section was filmed at one frame per second. If traffic flow through a bottle-
neck was being studied, the location wa s filmed at two frames per second. A
sample data sheet which was used to take informat io n from the film is shown
in Figure 2. Data was obta ined from 23 separate filming setu ps. The setup
loca ions are shown on the "Existing" se t of drawings.
Accid nts
The acciden t probl m in the study area is significant. During the p riod
rom July 1, 1972 through July 1, 1975, 925 accid nts have occurred on US 285
b tw n Santa Fe and Downing. Assuming a value of $90,000 for a death, $3,700
for an injury, nd th a tu 1 value for prop rty da g , In th thr e y 1r
period t otal e e conomlc loss cr t d by e ccid nts as $1,549,400 .
Th accld n s shown on th enclosed "Accid nts• se are for th tw lv
nth p rlod fr July, 1974 hrough Jun , 1975. During this p riod 298 ccld n
o curr d . On which occu d n ar th Sa 1 f In r ang as 1 fatality
...
• •
3
-
k
b
h
II
II
•
•
Hampden Capacity Study Data Sheet
Film Analysis
By ________________ _
1 . Draw lane configuration Date ___________ _
2. Traffic sample period? AM Noon PM Previously counted 60 -min. volume
Film Date Weekday Sat . on Hampden East Bound
on Hampden West Bound
3. Time 15 -mi n . period begi ns Fiim Speed: 2F/s or lF/s ?
4 . Cycle FIXED or ACTU ATED? Cy cle Time · sec.
Hampd en Gree n sec.
Hampden Yello w sec .
Hampden Red s ec .
5. le ft t urn bay? YES NO Le ft turn t im e : lef t t ur n arrow? ES NO sec.
6. L ading Gr en: YES NO How Long? se c .
h1ch approach: Hampd n East Oound
Ha den s Bound
X S r e t Horth Boun d
X Stre t South Bound
7. u r o c cl r 15· HIU eriod:
u r of r 15-fnu e p ri od :
On H • 8/7 t
On H s
On X s
On X s
9 . u y l lnute p riod
t
t
s
s
10 . on X p rfod:
--·--·-·-·-· ·--·--·--·--·--. ---
A • •
•
'
•
I C •
•
•
I
:. f
•
,. -
11. Total volume in 15-minute period:
Hampden East Bound ____ _
Hampden West Bound
X Street ~~orth Boun-.d ____ _
X Street South Bound ___ _
12. Number of cycles left turn bay blocks inside lane:
On Hampden East Bound ____ _
On Hampden West Bound On X Street North Boun ._,.d ____ _
On X Street South Bound ___ _
13. Number of left turns in 15-minute period:
Hampden East Bound 12/11 _____ %
Hampden West Bound %
X Street North Bound %
X Street South Bound %
~bl %
14. Pedestrian volume in 15-minute period:
15.
Across Hampden East Bound
Across Hampden !~est Bound --
Across X Street North Boun..------
Across X Street South Bound ___ _
Tota 1
Number of right turns in 15 -minute period:
Hampden East Bound -----
Hampden West Bound -.-----
X Str e t North Bound
14/11 -----:~
-----~ -------;~ X Str et Sou th Bound ----_ ___,:. ___ %
Tota 1 _____ l
16. Par ing on-str t wi h1n 250' of intersection:
On orth Bou d X Street? YES NO One Side Both Sid s
On outh Bound X Stree t? YE NO One Side Both Sides
17 . lu mb r of RTO Buses
On East Bound t1ampden -----
On W st Bound Hampd n
On North Bound X Str e-::t ----
On Sou h Bound Str t ----
18 . Observat1ons cone rn1ng int rruptions in flow:
,._
'
• •
I
•
0
•
involving a pedestrian. During the field investigation, the presence of
physical features either on or near the road which might have contributed
to the accident were evaluated with respect to each accident location. When
it was determined that a physical feature such as a sight obstruction or
traffic control element could be an accident cause, the factor was noted and
treated during the design phase.
Traffic Flow and Level of Service
The level of service for traffic flow varies during the day as a function
of the volumes and turning moves. Characteristic weekday traffic flow is
shown in Figure 3. From 9:30 PM until 6:00AM, two-way volumes on Hampden are
below 1200 vehicles per hour (vph), turning wrves are minimal, and side street
volumes are minima l. After 6 :00 AM,volumes on Hampden build reaching a peak
from 7:00 AM to 8:00 AM when 1800 vph is carried in the east bound lanes and
750 vph west bound. In the interval from 6:00AM until 9 :30AM, the predominate
flow is east bound, turning mo ve s are minimal, and side street volumes are mini-
mal at most locations .
From 9:30AM until 9:30 P~. west bound flo increases, during the middle
of the day balances ast bound flow at about 1500 vph each direction, and
th n aft r 3 :00 PM, w st ound flow predomina es reaching 2540 vph during the
p riod from 4 :15 to 5:15 with 1450 vph ast bound. Through volumes are heaviest
in the afternoon, but the side street volumes nd turning moves are also heaviest
1 during lh1s period.
U ing lev 1 of rvice d finitions from th lftg y Capacity Manual, n
evalu tion o the existin conditions of flow w s d The load factor, de-
f n d as t ratio of th nu b r of gr n phas s ttat ar fully utiliz d to
th total num r of gr n pha s av ilable dur1ng 1 given tim perlod was used
•
•
-
I
I
• I
•
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I .
•
•
0 ~~
•
~
t-
00/l:l. ~ '..in/YIIN
;7 .::1/ HJ. JO t?1
fiC . 3
~ 0
'I
•
ZZ:OO
Zl :oo
zo:oo
~-:00
18:00
n :oo
t~:oo
' 1.5."00
,.,. .. 00
I.!J :OO
12:oo
1/:00
10:oo
':oo ~ ~
tJ 00
?.00
'-·00
.:s ·oo
4 00
!100
z :oc
I 00
o ·oo • •
5
, . ,
•
•
0
as a primary indicator. The capacity manual defines level of ~ervice B as a
condition of s table flow with a load factor less than 0.1. The manual defines
level of service Cas a condition of stable flow with a load factor from 0.1
to 0.3 and occasional periods when drivers may have to wait through more
than one red signal indication. Leve l of service D occurs when flows begin
to become unstable, the load factor is from 0.3 to 0.7, and de1ays become sub-
stantial. St andard design criteria use the flow at level of service C for the
design volume .
Based on these criteria, flow conditions were analyzed. During the eve n-
ing and in the morning until 9:30AM, flow along Hampden is between level of
service B and C. Very few phases are loaded and the flow i s stable. From
9 :30 N~ until 9 :30 PM flow along Hampden becomes unstable and the level of
service is D. More than half the phases are loaded and there are periods
where drivers have to wait through more than one cycle. The situation at Inca
in the -left turn bay has the most serious delay of any point in the section and
operates at level of service F. During most afternoons, drivers turning left
wait as long as five cycl s to rna e the turn. Throughout the day, except on
the approaches to Cinderella City, cross street traffic is never enough to pro-
duce a loaded phase. Th cross street load factor is less than 0.1 and no
drivers wait more than one r d signal indication.
Although today's volumes on Hampd n ar less than its m ximu cap city,
today's volum s do exce d norm 1 d sign standards. If traf c during the
evening peak fncr as s pprox1 ately 10 percent and t e signals and g tries
r in as th y r today, flow w1ll stop and go with consid rable d 1 Y>
flow will appro ch maxi
rate will fncr se.
j ,
capacity at 1 v 1 of servic E and th ccid n
• •
,
-
I
I I
I
' ~
I
I
I
• I
I
I
h
fl
•
I •
•
Many of those who regularly driv e this section have the feeling that
Hampden is operating at capacity, regardless of the time of day . However,
the capacity manual states that capacity occurs at level of service E with
a load factor of 1 .0. The volume on Hampden is less than the maximum capacity
at all times during the day. The reason that Hampden appears to be operating
at capacity is because of interruptions in flow, not because volume is ap-
proaching capacity. This fact is demonstrated by the results of the speed and
delay study where data was collected from 7:00 to 7:40AM, from 2:45 to 3:20PM,
and from 4 :15 to 4:55 PM during ~:eekdays. The average time for a speed and
delay run through the section from Santa Fe to Gilpin movin g with either east
bound or west bound flow was 5 minutes 30 seconds with a minimum of 5 minutes
and a maximum of 6 minutes 6 seconds. There was no statistical difference in
the times of runs made during different periods of the day. There was also no
statistical difference in the t imes of east bou nd and west bound flow. A car
moving west bound was s.topped at an aver age of five intersections. Cars were
never stopped more than one phase a t any intersection, however, the interrup-
tions cause d by stopping at the signals caused a standing delay of approxi-
mately two minutes. During the months when the speed and delay runs w remade
the master con troll r was malfunctioning and the signals generally were opera-
ting on the mid -day progression pattern.
Traffic Si n ls and Controllers
Th r are tw 1 sign liz dint rs ctfo ns along the s c tfon . 0 tails of
th~ controll rs are shown in Figure 4. All t e controllers ar electro-
chanfcal and us thr e programs. The inters ction controllers ar intertied
with a aster cont oll r located w1thin t Cngl od City Hall. Th int rties
ar h rd wir d og th r . Phon lin s r not u d for th int rti yst
I
•
•
]C!I!il!l!ll!l-
0 , .
•
• SIDE
INTERSECTION tM1BER STREET
WITH CONTROLLER OF VEIIICLE PEDESTRIA
HAMPDEN ~1ANUF ACTURE R PHASES ACTUATIOtl ACTUATIO
Inca Eagle 3 Yes Yes
Huron Eagle 2 Yes Yes
Galapago Eagle 3 Yes Yes
Fox Eagle 2 Yes Yes
I Elati Eagle 3 Yes Yes I I I Cherokee Eagle 2 Yes Yes
I Bannock Eagle 3 Yes Yes
Sherman Eagle 2 Yes Yes
I Logan Eagle 3 Yes Yes
• I
I
tJ Clarkson Eagle 2 Yes Yes
Dol'(ning Eagle 2 Yes Yes
~ Gilpin Eagle 3 Yes Yes
.I TRAFFIC SJGIIAl CO~TROLLERS
I FIGURE 4
I
• I
II
• II • •
h J :1•
fl
I •
-
R
.T
s
!S
!S
!S
!S
!S I
!S II
!S
~s I
!S ~
!S
~s fl
rl
I
II
• II
h
• h
II
It
•
•
I•
•
This minimized intertie problems.
The controllers are from three to six years old. They experience, in
the Consultant's opinion, an unusual number of maintenance problems and gen-
eral operational problems. During the three month period of data collection,
at least one controller was malfunctioning each time the Consultant was in
the field. The cycle and phase times on most of .the controllers varied ex-
cessively. When the signals were set on 80 second cycles, the maximum cycle
time variation ~1as from 68 to 92 seconds. The average controller varied
+ 4 seconds .
The controller located at Sherman frequently malfunctions when actuated
by either a vehicle or pedestrian and £1i '"S only a maximum of five seconds
of green time; pedestrians need 27 seconds to cross Hampden. This is a
parti cular problem be cause Sherman is a primary access route for students
going to Flood Junior High School. The accident diagrams show an unusual
number of broadside accidents (10 during the past 12 months). These accidents
are probably attributable to the sho rt, five second green for the cross street
wh en the controller malfunctions.
Most of the signals are supported by span wires. The poles supporting
the span wires have started to bend and the signal heads are sagging. During the
past few mon ths a number of heads have been damaged by truck traffic. All bent
poles supporting span wires should be replaced and the signal h ad cl arance
increased. The City noted this probl early in th study and has taken st ps
to replace the poles.
'
• •
1
' ' 0
0
0
• 0
~JillreMrYD4~C ~
;.,fC,.,T nw• OC<:UIIIA.WCE
O.O.J"' r,~ OCC1Jtlb4Nc£ --.-v n xco OIIJ «cr ---a
1.5 •lfOAo IJID« _j
A T ~H' 'lJII1W __,--
or OVII/ITAII(f!Vt'; rURIV
.._,0 tJJIX ~WI~, SIUJ~ 0 1116Cri0AJ
-.oo .,o• !IINt lf!IVC. t:IJ!III#iiiO.&I rltT ~
DI~ICTIO/l.J
~or.r ~o ~
'f
KEEP
RIGHT -·
•
•
ITANDAIID ICN.$
,.,, ..
,.,,. 1
-.
""''PIIO•'""'..A rtf t.ocAr,o,..,
0tr 611 13 TtNc; #0 _.
• •
•
1-
t•
•
I ~
•
I
'~ ..
.. ,
I
•'-•rz
•• I I .. ---r---
IJJ', . .,-, ..
1 Ill
--A.<AN
,
j.:
I~ ..
•
' -:J=t ,
C'ALA~ACO
~,I w ~ .
:r ' ~t:
~ .. I ..
I "'k ~ --...,
,,~
' ,....._ ..
I I
4 ..... .,
•.
N
• •
,
'
~
' '
CD
N
11
•
•
0 I•
•
RIGHT
TURN
THIS
LANE.
<Z> ~
• •
• -
0
•
I •
•
APP~O.II ~"'--#,;11, TE LOCAriOJV
0' 4.111 1.,TIAH; POW
* 4££ CEIJ£RAL LECEIJO Sltf C ·l
~0.11 £)(/$TIIJC SICIJALIZA riOIJ
F"ILMIIJC: LOCATIOt..J
FtiJO OIR~CTIOt..J
•.
•
,
• -
0
•
N
•
t•
0 r • ~
' "
l . .
~ r ----. r----
'
. . .
• •
,
•
0 ,.
•
•
.Siri.C·I t.ECEAJO
CEM RAt. AI14LIZATIOAI CXI.STIIJC !SIC
• •
-
' I
, I. ,
•
•
•
...
• •
]-
I
I
I
I
}
I
•
•
•
...
---
RIGHT LANE
TO SHE"MAN
OR BROADWAY
ONLY
LOC:AN
/AITERSECTIOAI Vo.LVM£
NAMPOEAII Lat;AN
* ~£ C£JJ£RAL L.£C£J.
SM t; ·I ~Of? £1f1STI M:,
~CA/ALIZATIOA/
.. Fli.MIA/C LOCATIOAI
..---IVJO DIRECT lOA/
'
• .
• •
,
'
:' I
,,' \~ . -~::;::1 [·~:::,,. --·
•
1: ,, ,, ,, ,, ,.
•
0
•
SWEDISH
HOSPITAL
., ,,
'• '• '• .,
'• :. ,, ,,
" " " " ,, ,, ., i:i ,, ., :. ,, ,,
" t: ,,
" :: ,,
i' ,,
•' ,,
::
. -... _:~ _L ... :-·:· .. :
E N CI £WOOSC~OOL HICH
L _
,, ., :,
OJ ,, ,, :.
" ,,
'• '• '· ,,
" \:~>.::: -
·.
• •
-
I
N
I
-1-
I
I
,,
I :· ,, " ,, I ,, ,, ,, ,, ,. " :. II j~ " II ,, ., ,,
'• ,,
'• ~ " I , " " " ~ ~ ~ ,,
.; ,:, :: -·-II
TUTVIC
IC• C~/.JT
~'11..11..A(,F
----~ ~--
•
•
" ,, ,,
"
•
•
i..E~EIVO :
LAIV£ LIN£$
.APP.?OJ(~AA.A 7£ ~OCATIOAJ
~ £.-.I~TIA.Ic; N OW
* ~£' CE'JJ£/l.AL LECEAID 5/tfC-1
nJ# £Xt!!STI A.IC 51CAIALIZ.A.T/OAI
" FIL M/AX: LOCATIOAI
4 f Dl. CTIOAI • •
• -• .
• t•
• . .
I
I
I
I
•
• I • •
• -
0
•
•
•
•
* .:>££ C£A1£RAL I..EC£A10 5VC ·I
1'"01? £X1!5rtAIC SICAIAI..I ZA710N
• r l t.Mti.IC t.OCATIOAI
• AAIO Ollfi£CrtOAI
'
•
. .
•
0
I
• ,_------
• t•
• l -.
'
• •
7 •
•
•
1-
0
•
]
(
'--------"{-~
• r 11
•
..
0 ..... ArALirY
0
0
• NK.Hr ,.,Wt6 OCCVJIIAAICI
0 ~J" ,..._ OCCUIIIIAAICL
I'VD ~T»#AAI
If« ~~~ •wo ---+--
~ nxao .. J«Cr --a
.. ~D.JOC __J
AT ~N 'Vftl ___,--
or
.IUD -
'
~....,,,.,.,!J,,IJJ.DI .. CTIO/IJ ~
~~ .,.,,,.,. ~,.. ~ _<:,__
~.,..~~
• •
• -• (•
•
'
•
• • •
,
•
• -• •
0
0
0
• 0
~-rv~c•
NICHr ,..,.,,._ OCC'U.,ANC•
~..-,,,..,. occc.MI4A.o<'•
1116 III£Aif •410 ---t-
..
'<~ Tur•o .,.,.c.r ----o
~ ~DWDC _.J
AT ~N I'LIIl'A/ __,--
or ~lfTAI(II'J<; r&IIIIN =:!J
....0 IJit:W ..,_,,~, .s,tuJ«IHII._CTJ(M.I ~
. (
• •
,
-
-
•
•
0
•
-. . .
. . .
•
• < •
•
•
J
•
. . ! , ..
•
•
0 FArALITY
0
0
• N<HF ru.,,. OCC'UAIANC.
0 ~y T IAAC OCC~ ..
,_,D ~~r.rtti.AAI
.. lr£4/ll • .,D --+--
••
JI"'IJ ,., • ._o .. ..-cr ---a
-__, .__ __.J
Ji4T ~N~__,.-
OT ~4MA(/NC "-"'AI~
.....a ~.WN'W.&AA.M~t:rJOW ~
NO _,~~~~.OI"'tf"''.,f'W ~ _c,__
.. -!"' ..,.~ ~
. .
• •
,
•
' '
l ..
I
' -------J
:-~:·~~ ...... ,..__ •-'-
•
0
•
:,
IJ '• '• lo ,, ,, ,,
II
" II
II ,,
''·
., .,
i:~ ,, ., .,
lo :: ,,
I• ,, :: ,, ,, ,,
I• ,, ,, ,, ,, ,,
II
,,
L
,, ., :.
II ,, ,,
:o
" ,,
'• '• I, ,, ,,
'I '~:::::::.·=:
• .
• •
]
L
,, .,
!: I ,,
:: J :: ~
:: 0 '· ~ ;: tU
~~~::~::·..::-: ~
c!}.
•
•
0
•
, .
J.llCiltJD ~-jliCt:IDilA.IT DATA
0
0
0
• 0
~·T'Yo.tA,ollooiii.C •
NICH,. T I AAC oct:VI/I.tiVJICI
.O...lt"' TIIWC DC~C' --
..
,. ,,x~o .. .M<:.r ---o
.. ~~I» __J
AT ~N 7UtlrAI __,..-.
or ~W~t«n.ll(n.< rcnrw ~
....0 .-JDC .... ~, SAAI. DII.CTJtMI .:::7"C;
-~06....,,~.~.,,.. ~
~CTIOIIV
~01')1"~~
• •
I
-
•
•
0
•
l=======~~~~~~~~~=J ,, ,,
ii ,.
i!i I ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ., ., :· •' ,, ,, ,, ,, ,, ., ;·
_j L __ _
[JD ~ ..
--,-----~.: ' ..
" :: ..
•I :· •' •' •' ::
10e
~l
'
• •
-
•
•
• I II •
•
·, -
A/OTE ACCINAIT DATA
COUPI.ET~ n:J /)()WIJIAIC $T
DOWAIIAIC 71:) CILPIAI D-"TA
WA.S I<IQT AVA/1.~1.
0 ,.._,.""-'rtl'
0
0 ---
• ......c:,,,...,.~~·
0 ...... ,....,..~.
llflll ~.,....IIJ ... --"" ., -
•.
..
• •
I
-
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
0
•
DESIGN CONCEPTS AND ALTERNATIVES
The design concepts and alternatives presented in this section are based
upon the data shown in the previous section and on standard traffic engineering
techniques. The primary objectives ~~ere to:
1) Increase capacity and improve traffic flow on Hampden
a) eliminate points causing interruptions in flow
b) reduce standing delay time
c) proportion any r ema ining delay betw een Hampden and
the side streets
2) Cure causes of traffic accidents
The design criteria were based on Colorado Division of Highways prac -
tices and specifications.
The proposed changes are shown in the five drawing set "Design Concepts
and Alternatives" included in this section. The changes fall into three
cal gories:
1) Construction of a raised barrier media n from Santa Fe to Bannock
with pro c ed l eft urn bays;
2) Spot chan ges in signing and g ometrics;
3) R vision of signal i ings an d prog r ion patterns.
The recomm ndation to cons ruct a raised barrier m dian from Santa Fe
to Bannoc was pr pared as a re~ult of analysi of th lapse film, the
accld·nt diagra~s and fi ld observations. Le ft tu rns in o mid-bloc k drive-
lane and loos con rol of flo will be el1m1n ted
by pr s nc of th m dia n. Locations where lef turn ys are needed
and r ch ng s in t he signing and/or g trie s ar r co nded ar sho wn
on h d ig n sh s.
1
•
•.
'
• •
,
]
I
I
I
•
0 I•
•
Cinderella City Access
Although all the changes are clearly marked on the design sheets and
need no discussion in this text, the recommended philosophy of Cinderella
City access is a substantial change from what now exists and calls for some
discussion . A the same time i t must be remembered that the latitude for
design changes i nvo lving Cinderella City is limited because of the structural
design of the Cind erell a City parking area. Within the parking lot, those
areas now used as mo ving traffic lanes cannot be relocated because they were
designed to carry moving loads, whereas the parking areas were not designed
to carry moving loads. This restriction considerably complicates development
of design revisions.
As was noted earlier , the Inca intersection has the most delay of any
intersection in the study area. This is because it is used as the primary
access point into Cinderella City for traffic coming from Santa Fe or the
west. During busy shopping periods more than 250 vph turn left into the shop-
ping center at Inca. As the vehicles enter the par ing area, the capacity of
the entrance to the par ing area restri c s th flow. The length of the left
turn phase is limit d by the magnitude of e s t bound trough volume which
also gen rat s a subs tantial d m4nd for green ti T e thodology used in
t is d sign for all a c s fro ~arrpd n to C 1 nd re 11 a City is bas d on a con-
ctpt of r ducing nd for 1 ft ur s at Inca.
It is re Huron e d v lop d s th jor ntrance into
s epping c nt r. ign d, flu ron wi 11 erv a t e focal point for
~ c nt r. I • at t l , Inca ly a c ss th und rground par 1ng,
th t turn d at ca Wlll r uc d. R du lng th ft turn d nd
at Inca will a 1 0 ro tl r1 lcs o s ction b w n
;:;'t
• •
8
f
-
•
I
I Santa Fe and Inca.
•
I •
•
The other major change in the vicinity of the center is the use of the
outside wes t bound lane. This l ane has been intended for use as a right
I turn only lane but a portion of the existing through flow use s the lane.
I
I
I
The throu gh volu me using the lane is not great, howeve r it is enough to dis-
rupt the flow of the vehicles entering and exiting the cen ter. The proposed
modification utilizes channe l ized islands located so as to force vehicles to
use the outside lane as a right turn only lane . With the redesig~ the lane
will start to work as an acceleration lane for traffic leaving the center
and a deceleration lane for traffi c entering the cen ter. This should reduce
accidents involving west bound through traffi•· and Cinderell a City traffic,
as well as improve flow of the west bound lane s.
All recommendations concerning Cinderella City evolved as the result
of a series of meetings with the taff of Cinderella City, the City of
Englewood, the Division of Highways and the Consultant. A number of alterna-
tives were dev loped, discussed and r vis d. Th concepts sho wn on the design
sh ets are thos which wer th most ace ptable to the group.
_i_gna 1
Ma jor r evisions in th signal lming and progression patterns are recom-
mend d . The de ails are s own on t e thr e h s t "Tim and Space Diagrams"
includ d in this section. Ba d on preli 1 nary analysis and etings with the
City, the basic cycl 1111 0-s cond cycl It is r co -
m ·nded at the program Chc! 9 d oll Jng: a 0-s cond cycl with
pr Pdo ina te dS flo ro Al1 Ul i1 9: 0 a 90-cond eye 1 e with
• I
r dominat w 1 w and mor ion and p ovi ion for
h avy urn1ng mov tl 9 : 0 d I -s cond y 1 Wlth
;I'
•
,._
'
•
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
0
•
balanced progr essio n from 9:30 P~1 until 6 :00AM. The timing of each pattern
is also chan ged subs tantially ; tod ay the patterns are all 90-second cycles
and work from 6:30 to 9:30AM, from 3:30 to 7:30 PM, and the third during
the mid-day and at nigh t . A 65-second cyc le during the evening is recom-
mended because the vo lume s don't warrant a larger cycle time. Und er low
volume conditions a 90-second cycle creates substantial delay to through
trips or cross s tree t trips stopped by red signals. Because the busines s
area along Hampden works seven days a week, it is recommended th at th e pa t-
terns be used seven days a week.
In the existing system cross street signals generally receive abou t
30 percent of the cyc le time. This result ~ in considerable delay to through
vehicles on Ha mpde n and unused gree n time and minimal delay on most of the
cross streets. Consequen tly, it is re comme nded that the signal timing~
be revised ~o that the delay on Hampd en and the cross streets is balanced.
In the tim i ng shee t s delay was balanced by matching Hampden and cross street
green times to the approac h volumes at each intersection. This results in
most cross streets aving green times of 15 to 21 seconds; Log an is the
maximum with 27 seconds.
With the e isting controllers it is not possible to se t one maximum
green time for cross str t vehicles and nether maximum green time for p des-
trians. This i a d s1rable c pability because p destrians need 27 seconds
o al across H m den, inters ctions such as Downing or Gilpin
r utr only 14 con s to ;ove t e nor 1 cro s str t v hicle qu ue.
gr non t i ting controll rs mus t b set at 27 seconds be-
cau of p ds. T r for the in quity of consfd rably delay o
~ lCl s on H n 111 011 int. until t tstln con roller ar replac d
,,
II'-·
• •
9
-
. I
I
I
with fully expansible controllers.
Controllers
•
0
•
The existing electro-mechanical controllers require an unusual amount
of maintenance time and expense. Some of them, particularly the controller
at Sherman, are unreliable. To compound the problem, the controllers will,
within the next five years, no longer have the capability of coping with the
volumes developing along Hampden.
The volumes along this section of Hampden could be handled more effi-
cien tly with digital controllers that have the capability to meter the flows
and more accurately proportion the green time during each cycle. For ex-
ample, during one cycle there may be t ·c: r rs in a left turn bay and during
the next cycle there may be six cars. The existing controllers give each
cycle the same amount of green time as long as an actuation occurs. A digi-
tal controller could give enough time for two cars to clear the first cycle
and six the second cycle, but no extra green time would be allocated in either
case.
It is r comm nd d th at a controll r replac nt program be initiated as
soon as possible and expansible con rollers, pref rably digital, be purchased.
Whil funding i~ being soug ht to • urchase the con rollers, it is recommended
that controll rat Gilpin be ~ov d to Sherman. The i de s reet volu s
at Gilpin ar low and f ped stri ns cross. An unr 1 iable controller will
cr It r probl s at G lpin th n at Sh nnan . Th con roll r at G11p1n i
re -P s H ith r Gilpin nor n av ol o warran a r -pha e
con lroll r, but SlnC s r n has n changed 0 • t -way str t, t n
for 1 t rd ph a will pro bly 1st soon r at n.
I.
'
• •
,
J -
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
(t
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
•
•
0 , .
•
Final Comments
The recommendations detailed in this report, if implemen ed, will result
in a substantial improve me nt in capacity and level of service, a reduc ion i n
average travel time from 5 minutes 30 seconds to less than 4 minut s or
average vehicle traveling from Gilpin to Santa Fe, and a measurable reduction
in the accident rate. However, these resultant effects will only be an interi
improvement if new fully expansible controllers are not acquired as rapidly as
possible. Within five years the existing controllers will not be capable of
handling the volumes.
Many of the recommended improvements are interrelated and should not be
implemented individually . For example , le design changes at Inca, Huron and
Galapago should be implemented at the same time during a period of relatively
low sales volumes at Cinderella City. Implementing these improvements sep-
arately over a period of months coul d create other flow problems that negate
the intend ed improvements. Careful consideratio n of the interrelationships be-
tw een design changes before implementing them is advised. No changes should be
impl ment d prior to a h a y traffic season. For example, no changes sould be
implement d be we en the f i rst of ovember and m1 ddle of January.
Finally, it s t be noted that the re comm nded changes are based upon the
City's b s est ima t o how vacant l and al ong Ha pd n will develop and whether
exis ting u s wil l r 1n tab l e or r d v lop . If u s tant i 1l changes in th
City' la nd us phn of nd d i s y rtquir r -
vi ion. T Ja t1on sa 1t may requir
r 1 ion 1 u s t antial d lo n and r south of Ha pden .
·-
• •
I
I
I
I
I
•
N
AWOI•u;~ ~AWJilll 1&J AIII'OV~DIC
A..V ADD 1ru~AJA.L 4)0 01'
A.#llfrCIAJ< Dl .. rAJJC6'
•
0
•
•.
r
I
L
'
• •
-
•
•
I
·/I
I
I
I
I!
I
I
I
I
•
•
0
•
/~
I CAII IVC HOULD FOLIJJW
IAI./tM D IJAIJI.IAI.. Xt:CPr
A AIOTEO -.
I•
LAuE LINEa ========
.Sr<MF"ICAA!r ~MA; ~•As ~
A'P.t1Q•.IAJA rE I..OCAriOAI
l!'ltl'!" ~/II'#.JIT.I--c A a W
J
I
•.
f
'
• •
,
-
I
I
I
~
I
l
I
I
I
I
• I
I
• I
.111£DC$JC:W HUJI10AI n::t
.W.AJO.Il E~>Jrq.A.I<Jt:6 AAJD
E•l'rPOuvr
.VOTE TH/5 AC TIO#J tAl
rAA.IDEAA WlrH I'IJC.A
CN.A./'JC,E SHOUL D gC.sutJ
/4/ urrL£ o_. NO Lo.s•
0~ P A IIUl'I"-'C
,
I·. I
•
-
ALTERAIATE I
CA LA~CO • r""""' W .... Y OOIIV'l 1:4AUP
~· £~o.~14'AIJCC lil'£$JT I<"T£0 1tJ WL!ST
I!J().UAJO 1'.PAr,tC. IIV C"HA AJ~o..t£LIZ I A.IC, TU.QAJ
..... -._r=_...,
ALT. A/AT£ Z
("At.A...,.CO • T ..,._..., DG...,. AlWI,.
-.A ,_ ..,.,.,. Ll «'-
NA..,,._ .._,~ .. 1Jt,...,w r rv•
•
•
--o ---
lARK I NG
LOWER
LEVEL
~
SU RF AI
'
I r---..
I
, .
• •
-
-
I
I
I ,.
•
0
•
I
I
;-
N
'--------'I • r-------
.,. •• c ......,_., ,. ....r-.ar ~
I' ......... ~ OtltJ 4.;A.,. .,Otl. )
SICA/lA!<; $H(X.JL0 FOLLOW
sr.-.AIOA/10 MAWUAL ElfCEPT
AS AXJT£0
• •
•
I • -
~-
ICHER'O"f"i!:,e N-"VYtPDEw l
..... J! I
I I I -~
I
I
J
' r-
I
~,..A ...
t
I
•
~
~
I
J I
J
I•D
•
• • •
[
•
•
LAio.l£ L1AI£a ==:::::::::::-.=
~1-;JVJF'II;A,NT ~.CIA./t; AJt~A· ~
~10 ~,,.£ LlfV£ o1i1oV0
;11'f.JAA6L.I •r•'~
APPilOXIAAAT£ LOCATION
OF ~X1.5TIN'C; ./VOW
(~~,.;;-~':'"~ ... ;:;':~If .--o:s
~ CUIIf. cur 'Aitr"'L'
~·,--~·-I
IC IVC HOULD ""'LOW
$T.tAM D W CI.PT
.t NOT, D
N
* ~-:;~:::.:rr~~tr!:!
-'HAa6 C/JIIJJ llfANili'DaAI
'•ar~·~
DAACI/flltlliVIo#•)
l# A~l'f P'UIMU
,111/VJJQ~.,~·
~A,II .. ..,O
;
• .
1
l
..
• •
-
r
r
r
f
1
L
l
' ' ' '
/ ~-----··<·:;::1
..
•
•
0
•
I I
_j L ________ __)., L
11
,--r ____,
,, .
" ~I ii ~ l:
~I ::
~I : l
~ " ~ " ~II i: ,, ,.
•' I ::
\ :· . •' ILJ'L!j .\ ,.
r:-:::-...... : ,_: ---
c-:."':..-:.-=-~~---_,__ -'-..--.. -.::__-_ • • ..
I
'' '· ,, ,, ,, ,.
l :: •' .:
r:: :::.-.· ::: '::::: • 1
I
r·-.. ·-··
i
I
:,~-~ ,, :: '• .,
!: ,, ,,
" " " " ,, ., :• ,, ,, ., ., :.
"
::cu ,, ,, ,, ,, ,,
" ~-JL __
,,
:· ,, ,, ,,
:• •' " .,
'• '• I , ,,
! ~ \: ..... ........
•
• •
t
l
I
-r
./
I
I . ,
!I
I
'· I•
l
•
" 'I
II
" II
'I
II
II
I•
" •I
:: .u r: ~
I, Q :: J " " ___;:.__.
=-----~
(),
•
0 I • -
,,
" II ...
:I ..
II
" ::
II ::, .,
'I '•
::1 " n
" ~---~~
vi'
<'CA/IA.'C 3NOULD n:JLLOW
TAAIO D MA AI(.IAL £ C£Pr
AJOr. D
A.-PR01fh4.AA7E £oc;AriOAJ
~ Llf13 TU.Jt:; IVO W
l
'
• •
l
I
r
I
I
I
I
•
I
=----
•
•
I
I i
o' .:
0
0
Oo
Oo
0
'o
0 :o o: ,o
0
0 o, !' ""-1' ..............
• •
' . ,
I
r
•
•
•
0 -
N
"----~ __.
I 0 I ~'U L
----=
IC t AX: $HOULO J"""LLOW
$TA OAI::tO M.<'A.IUA £J(C PT
AS AIOTEO
--------------
.. ._. 11 ._,A ,, 4.0JC A T
CfMtr 6•.,1 ~4.1< #O W
'
•
• -
0 t•
•
TIMINC SCH£01./L -..-coNQ t:YCLI T7Attll
A40.UC AIM/W~U '~ I NCA r r AI/IIID• A4Y • •:.o ;II4AII n» •:~
4.,.,.. ru .. N All/rOW C""IN *"' .... AU ,.,
UAD I~ I~C. Yo IIC. ... IIIC. • • ••c . INIIIICrhOIV c ... c ...
INCA IA•r ~-·~-· .... ~ ..... -· .... .... 6.0 --· It IO<IWO
NUirON l:_...r i-'~·7 1--·· l.a.o
_ .. .... 1.7 ,_.
60UNQ
r CA'-A~A~O I:A4r .. o,~., •.• , • .o .. I: ..... ,. .. -IOU NO
I'OJt --_L. .... ... ,. . ••
ll.Arl I:Aor ••lc.,. .... ~ -· .... •.. •• 60UND
~NIIIOII'IE -r---t--· ..... , .. ...
aANNOC/IC _L. .... -· ,_ . .. I . If I
4NII.-..N ...J.._ _.J.. -· ""' ... ,_. I . I
.~ot;AN
,.._
•-tl.? ,, .. , •.. -· ........ ••• .. .. ,. ..
~I.AIIN.OAI ..... •.• 11.7 .... , .... .~ •. , , .. ,_,. 1 .0 •• • .., .....
.. ,.,.,,NC ...J.._ _.J.. .,., .... 1.7 •.. ,. ..
~AV'ITr•t_,J -r--r-..,_, ,... ,_ . ... --·
CIIJIII4/ (I) + + .,., ... •• •• /.It
I' ... -, ..
-
,. I ,..
~
,_
l
t .. •
..
·-• • • • i I i I I t ~ t ~ l ..
f ~· .)
I
,
•
•
·~ 'UL£
I I •. AI
O M lAIC A ro t;/L~AJ
A./IJ -, •• .60...., ~ ,.61>
•£c. .... •1c.
-:3 1 .0 I'P.I
--IP.I
~ --,._
--,.,
----, ..
-~ ---7
IJI ,~,
--· ,. ... 16.1 ~ 1 .• .....
'·· 1 .0 ..... ,,,
1 .0 HI -,. ,. ,.._
,. ... ,.... -
J-1.,.
' I I
-1
•
JtriD (4 ) ..
, ...
,.. ....
, ..
It .I> ....
......
,. ..
......
l.a.t> .....
..... -·
I
J'WrAL •10
••c ~
, ... .,.0
"" ,. ...
IW.-.....
""' , ..
..... , ..
-7 ....
,.,. .,_,. .... --· .....
u.. -· ..... , ...
~eo~ ,._.
..... ...
~ ....
..,.,. .. ,,. (I J
,
•
I
• . -••
77
• -
M
... -
I ..
f
~
•
•
NOTI•:
riJ L61"T T~·AJ tl'tlv.A!II W I LL 16 IIIOUU~60
W,.,IN 116$10tiiVTIAL D6111'1L~IWINT
,_
AND Dt'tr'IC4 /C~S"'C•AL DE!ti'IEL~·NT
,.t:t:M.t,41rl.
t•J 01''.-lr,. .W~II·O '~ ._,CitJJNIA.IC
0' ,., ... ....,_.,:,e·IV A VI.VI.IE
t;IIIEV AT ILATt ro IIECtA./14/uiJC, 01'"
NA.NIPDIN A "'IAIU£
CAI6WAT~$1CWAL
t•) LA,.A.,ITT£ l.tVTIII~ICrtON WILL A/Or
##OUh~l ~lt;NA LIZA TIQA.I UAITIL
DIV4LDitAA6-IVT ON A./ORTH$101 0'
~PD6AI .. ,.....,.lilfN L""Aifl'lrTI
ANII CI~IIV ,. CI!I-'LITID
NJ W t TN I•~TtNC COAJr.-oLLIII•, ,.,_,
.181DI.T#I AAJ TJNIIIVt; 1 17•r~N0.)
CQIIJT6JOL. MArJMtJU (;lteiAI r71WI
01V TN6 CIIIO-.s .TII4'£r C'.trOU .-r•IET
TNWI£. ~N AN. A VIIIACI
I~CTID T~·
..
• •
•
]-
0 t•
•
TIMINC SCH£DUL£
.. ~D CY'CLI TrA<IIE
...... OotJIC' JIIIMM~IV~ IA/IICA r"O ~· -..., ~K ., . ..,'* .,. • ·oo.,o~~,W
41'r ru_..V A~OW C,.,IN YIUMV AU J/OID .. ~::~:::., IEC . ,..
-~ . ... ...:. ~ ..e . ~ ~ "' .. ..
'NCA ~•r .. .._. 16 ... 16 ... --... ... 1 •• •.. ._ --IJ ,,.., •• I , ... ~., .... --.. .. ... '·· I .D ~
C.AU~O ,.,..r .... , ..... , .. , .. --.. ... ,,6 I .D IDuNO
'Oil --...L ...L -· ... •• ... ,, ....
64.Ar, &A•r ... ,. ··'~ -"' ... ... ,. •.. --ClllllfOKIC ---r -r--· ... •• -1.1 ...
IAAINOt:. --t -=F _, ... •• , . 1.6 "'
.Nil~ --..4-......... -· ... •• •• 1 •• . ..
LD<;AW
,_ .. , ..... ''-"I•·· •• -.. -" ... -.-
~~Alit'~ r..., f. ..... 110, .... --... .. " 1.• .... A ...
IIO WWINI; --..4-......... -· ... •• ... • • . ..
4AI'*A..,I1'T•t_,) ---r -r-••• ... ... •• • • ••
•CI,__IV (I ) --I + -· -.... .. •• ...
--...
·-,.
I , ..
-~ .. , ..
l
• .. .. --·-• • •
I I !
..,; ,, I#
'.1
•
1--
Sc 1£0UL£
CYC41 """"I
V ,III'Oittt# INCA rQ t;I~N . , .. -., m •:ooAAA -
-~ ... , ~~~(-) _.,_
~ -c. "" -
4 , .. . .. 11.0 16.0 -
'·· ... •.. , •..
'·· ... 40 rao -,_, ... , .. 0 uo
, ... •• 0 , .... -· -,_. ~ ... u.o -•• ... -· .....
I , .. ... , ... .... -•• •.. .. . .... .. ,.. ... . --•• ... -· ,._ .
~· ... .... -· •• ... .... ... -
,.., .. 4. 111111
••c. .... .... __ .,
.... -.o .... ... 0 -· -~~ -· -~~ ... -· ... -· ..... -· ..... .... -· -.. -· -· --· •• -·
•
•
_,,..,.,. (IJ
•
•
• -
0 -..., -
0
IP
• .
••
NOr••:
I' I '6'T r'IJIIW ""'ASI WILL ~ .. OUt~
... ,.,.,.41 111~061\iriA L 06V6L~INr
AAit/1 Ot''ICE /C~I#CIAL I:JI..V~NT
4~r1.
r•J .,..,.,.•~••a '~M'C'~
il' ~~N Altlllt,.!L~ •
Clll€1tJ AT EL.ATt ro ~CIIIt/4/IA.IC 01'
NAA<'~IAI AW.£NUI
~~AI AT 6AC.H • .lt;AJM..
t•J LIU'A.,ITr-6 UJTIII.S6CTION WI4L NOr _,.OU, ..• IC,NAl.IZAI".:;JN UNTIL
06,1~CIIJT ON A.OJ/IrH.tQ¥ 01'
,.,.,_,#DIAl ~TIIfi/V.IV L..,Ati'ITTI
AN4 Ct~N ~ Co41• ... 6TID .
N~ WITI¥ IM4TNJC COVTII'CLLIII., T#t/6
~OI.T#IAN ruttiii NC f'I7.ECt:M10.)
C:O..,Tif'O~ 4-'Afll .... f UJ/oll t;I6I.V n~
01V r,.,E ~ ... TI££T C'IQN .,..liT ,... • ..,......,,..,AVI ... ,I
~~--CT6D~
• .
,
•
•
•
0 ,. -
Englewood Wate r and Sewer Board
Re ular Meeting
Fe bruary 18, 1976
The meeting waa called to order at 5:10 p.m. by Vice-Chairm.n Schnackenbera.
Members present; Schnackenberg, Hayes, Mann, Ullery, Ba ock , and Wallace
Members absent 1 Sovern, Ful l erton, and Taylor
Also present: c. B. Carroll, Jr., Director of Utilities
I. DISCUSSION OF WATER PRESSURE PROBLEMS I THE FO~/CH!NANGO AREA
This item was referred to th Board by h~ City Counci and tabl d a t tb January Meting.
Hr. Fullerton and Hr . Taylor a r riv d at 5:15 p .a. and t n ated.
The Board members beaan to discuss some o! th pr ata c ollected
in the paat few years re lat ing to th problea, in ord r to d teraine the con•
trlbutina cauaea of the low pres ure, and d lin ate som potential solutiona.
Hr. Mann interrupted to expresa h ia feel i na that with all th talk of pressure,
flow, and aervice Lin size, the Board as bel exce aiv ly prof saional and
not representative of th citizens.
Hr. Fullerto and Hr. Schnaekenb r s uaaest d to • Mann at th y to a r·
riv at a solution to the pr ssure probl as to 6tudy a ailabl data
before aaklna any hasty d cisiooa.
Hr. Mann interjected h ia fee l in&a that there bad alr ady b eD ou atud
and that ao.ethin ahould be don •
There followed aoac diaeuasion o! alternativea:
1)
2)
3)
Turn
Th pre
closed valvaa o Layt
b en op n a ll al
puap at
sure boost
holate the 0 a
Tbh would
Av
lloth r ar a ID j par
f
pla app 1 aile lhtl, ox, Cala • a11d Hur o •
Thh ld coat $1
H • Tay lor au at cl that lh lvard ro alt atlu d&U action atarted •
•
J -
•
•
0 -
-3-
Mr. Taylor said that tbe Board should take the init at ive in educa ting tbe citizens about meters.
Feeling that time would be helpful in assimilating the new information,
Mr. Schnackenberg moved;
Ms. Ullery seconded: That the ite be tabled for fur ther discussion
at the next re ular me ting.
Th cotion carried unanimously,
V. MEMBERSHIP IN THE COLORADO WATER CONGRESS
After a short di1cus1ion of the benefits of memb rsh p, the i ncrea1ing member-
ship fee1 and the City's fund shortages,
Mr. Schnackenberg moved;
Hr. Wallace 1econded: That the Board recomm nd to City Council that the
City not belon to the Colorado Wat r Congre11
at the present ti
Tbe ~tion carried by a vote of seven to one.
VI. VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Th City Council ha1 discussed 1 v ral probl 1urrounding th Valley ater
District end is considering a suit aga n1t the dis trict for 1tre t d ges
i ncurred durina a water main break in 1972. Th r e hav b en s v ral unsuccessful
atteapt1 by the water departm nt to dissolv th dl1trict which no longer need•
to exist. Apparently, the di1tr ict aemb rs are lling t o pay up to 7~~ o£
the debt to the City and are also will ing to dissolve.
The Board decided to invite th Vall y Water Di 1trict Board m r1 to the
next regular meeting to discuss dissolut on,
VII. The Englewood lie ntenn ial C 1si has asked Hr . Carroll t o b Chair-
man of a prograa to celebrate tb Bicent nnial by pain ing !ire hydrants,
The Board .. y want to b come i nvolv d to tb extent b s tt in cr ter a for tb progr-.
VIII. Th prellainary documents are c let d
the 201 Grant . Th full appl cation il du to
Tb tin adjourn d at 7:11 p.a.
n prepara tion for a 1 in
c letad 1 April l1t.
for
• •
-
(
(
•
•
0 -
Englewood Wat r and s~ t Board
Re ular Meeting
February 18, 1976
The meeting was called to order at 5:10 p.m. by Vi~ •Chairman Schnackenberg.
Members preaent: Schnackenberg, Hayes, Mann, Ull ry, 8ab oc , and Wallace
Membera absent: Sovern, Fullerton, and Taylor
Also present: C. B. Carroll, Jr., Dir ctor of Utll i t ea
I. DISCUSSION OF WATER PRESSURE PROBLEMS I TH FOX/CH
Thia it vas referred to th Board by Lh~ City CoL~cil and tabl d at tb
January ~ettng.
Mr . Fullerton and Hr . Taylor arrlv d at 5:15 p •• and r aeated.
The Board memb ra began to discus aom of th pr
in th paat f v year• ralatin to the probl , in ord r
tributin& cau1ea of the to pre1sure, and d lineat
Mr . Mann interrupt d to express his feeling tha
fl , and 1ervice lin ai~e, th Board •• bein AC
not repreaentative of th citizen•.
r. Fullerto a d r. Sc
r ve at a solution to the
before .. i an hasty d
lO
Hr. nn int rj cted b l1 fa lln a that theta had alr a y
and that aa.cthtn 1hould b don •
Tb r fol o d • ll
l) Av '
2) Turn
n oth
3) holat 7
h .. , pla app a a to
and roo.
Tbh ld at $1
Hr. Ta lor at d t It'd I ro ln
actio ta
n enou
prea are,
ulonal and
to at•
date
atud
ar a• ia jeopard •
lac. I., ox, Calapa
"" nd & t
•
-
•
•
f •
•
-2-
Discussion ensued about pulling a sec t i on of the 4" main in Fox Street to
see if it was tubercular.
,_
Mr. Hayes moved;
Mr. Mann seconded: A motion to unearth the 4 " main in Fox Street, and,
after chec k i ng the pressure at the .. in and on a
service l ine both wi th and without the overhead
pumps on, to remove a section of the p ipe to deter-
mine its cond i t i on, replac i ng that sect i on with
a new section and check i ng the pressures again.
The tion carried unanimously.
The Board agreed to convene a sp cial me ting on Wednesday, February 25, 1976
at 5:00 p.m. to discuss the findin gs.
Mr. nn s cused at o:35 p.m.
II. AMENDMENT TO THE CONNECT R AGREEMENT WITH CHERRY HILLS VILLAGE SANITATION
DlST lCT
Carroll gave a brief d cr ption of the agre nt and the amen~nt as
drafted by the City Attorney. The amendment concerned &rantin& a revocable
permit to enabl Ch rry Hills Village Sanitation District to construct a aever
main in • Jefferson to conn ct to the City'• interceptor.
Aft r brief diacu sion,
Schnackenber& moved;
Mr. Hay • second d: That the Board reca..end to Ci ty Council approval
of th ndment to th connector a&re.-ent with
C rry H lls Village Sanitat on Di atrict.
80t ion carried unani80usly.
III. llE A R USE
carri d un n .-ou
lV. p T
th r
ASSOC IATION
Dry Cree , on the • It aide of Winde~re
inde~re ater Us rs ~aociation in order to
d.
ructi n a d cost recov ry,
Board r c nd to Clty c: 1 appro;ral
Wind r.era Wetar Oaara ~aoc i at ion'a raqu at
ly.
t r aervica .
STkOCTUU
Mr . Carroll a d
ar~t atudy of lna l d
'
• •
•
•
0
•
-3-
Hr. Taylor said that the Soard shou l d take the initiative in educating the citizens about meters .
Feeling that time would be helpful in assimilating the new inform.tion,
Hr. Schnackenberg moved;
Ms. Ullery seconded:
That the item be tabled for furt h r discussion
at the next r egul ar meeting.
Th e mot i on carried unan i mous ly.
V. MEMBERSHIP IN THE COLORADO WATER CO NGRE SS
After a short discuss i on of the benefits of memb rship, the increasing member-ship fees and the City's fund shortages,
Hr . Schnackenberg moved;
Hr. Wallace seconded;
That th Board r ecommend to City Council that the
City not bel ong to the Colorado Wat r Congress
at the present time.
The motion carr i d by a vote of seven to one.
VI. VALLEY WATER DISTRICT
Valley •ater
t damages
The City Counc i l has discuss d • v ral problems surround i rg th
Di atrict and ia c ons id r ing a a u it a gain s t the distr ict or atr
i ncurred durin& a ater ma in break in 1972. Tb re hav b att~ts by th ter deparba nt to dissolv tb district
to exist. Apparently, th district ra are w llin
ral unsuccessful
tch no long r needs
•P to 7~~ of the debt to th City and are al eo wlllin t dissolv •
The Board deci ded to
next r e gular aeeti to Dietr ct oard re to th
VII. Th
man
Th
th
VI II . Th preli•inary doc nta ar
th 201 Crant . ull spplicat
Tb ae tin adjourn d at 7 :12 P·•·
d n
to
• Carrol to b ir·
n f re hydraat
1 lt n cr ter!a !or
or apply or
by r!l let.
•
I
] ..... -
•
•
-
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION
OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
DATE; February 18, 1976
SUBJECT; AMENDMENT TO THE CONNECTOR ACREEHENT WITH CHERRY HILLS VILLACE
SANITATION DISTRICT
REC<HCEHDATIONa That the City Council approve th amendm nt to the conn ctor
agr em nt with Ch rry Hills Village Sanitation District.
Reapectfully au itt d,
ENGLEWOOD WAT
, Chairaan
t fl
•.
..
• •
,
-
•
•
•
·, •
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION
OR RECOMMENDATI ON OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWE R BOARD
DATE: February 18, 1976
SUBJECT: WINDERMERE WATER USERS ASSOCIATION
RECOtiCENDA.TION 1 That the City Council approve th Windermere Water Users
Association's request for water service.
eap ctfull au itted,
s B D
·~~~~--~~----~Wl= Fullnt011, Chdrun ()
AttA t 12
•.
'
• •
l -
•
•
0
•
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNC IL REGARDING ACTION
OR RECOMMENDATION OF THE ENGLEWOOD WATER AND SEWER BOARD
DATE: February 18, 1976
SUBJECT: MEMBERSH IP IN THE COLORADO WATER CONG RESS
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council not approve me~bcrs h ip :n the Colorado
Water Congr ss at the present tim •
esp ctfully su 1 t d,
D S It OAitD
Atta
"
• •
-
•
•
0 •• -
A BILL FOR
AN ORDlNPJ.K:E GRANTING TO THE CITY OF GIERRY HILLS VILlAGE SANITATICN
DIS1RICT, ARAPAHOE COONTY, COLORADO, ITS UCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A
REVOCABLE PERMIT FOR A LICENSE TO ENCROAGI I A PORTI().l OF EAST JEFFER-
SON DRIVE WITii ONE 21-Il'Oi DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER, SUBJECT TO CERTAI
TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ENGLEWOOD,
COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1
The City of Englewood, a Colorado municipal corporation, hereby
grant to the City of Cherry Hills Village Sanitation District, a quasi-
municipal corporation, its successors and assigns , a revocable permit
or license to encroach with one tw nt} ·one inch (21") diameter sanitary
se~er line in a portion of East Jefferson Drive, within the City of Engle-
wood, State of Colorado, described as follows:
100 2
( )
C ncing at an existing manhol at East Jefferson
Drive located at the approximate center line extended
of the alley between Pearl Street and Pennsylvania
Street, thence southeasterly in East Jefferson Drive
for a distance of approximately 925 fee to a point
on the east line of Section 3, Township 5 South,
Range 68 West, located appro imately 2 0 feet south
of h southeast corner of th northeast bord r,
north t quar er, Section 3, Town hip 5 South,
Ran 6 We t.
• 1 •
..
• •
•
•
of the plans showing the exact location and dimensions of the
encroachment shall be filed with the Director of Public Works.
(b) The licensee shall pay all costs of construction and maintenance
of the 21-inch sanitary sewer line within the areas of encroach-
ment, and upon revocation of this permit, as provided herein, or
upon abandonment, shall pay all costs of removing of said lines
from the areas of encroachment and return the street to its ori-
ginal condition under the supervision of the City Engineer.
(c) The licensee shall bear all expense incurred by affected utilities
in changing, repairing, removing or altering their installation
within the area of encroachment, or in the area adjacent thereto, if
said changing , repairing, moving or alter1ng are caused by con-
struction within the area of encroachment.
(d) This revocable permit, or license, shall not operate or be con-
strued to abridge, limi ~ or restrict the City of Englewood, a
Colorado municipal corporation, in exercising its right to make
full use of East Jefferson r ive as a public thoroughfare, nor
~all it operate to restrict city u ilities or utility companies
in the exercise of their ri ht to construct , remove, operate
and maintain their or its installation within th aid street.
(e) The licensee shall a re to undemnify and always save the City
of Englewood, a Color municipal corporation, harmless from
all costs, claims or damages arising out of the rights and
privileges granted in this permit.
(f) During the e isten c o aid en ro hment,
ors and ass1gns, at it or th 1r expense,
th City of f:.n lcwood, h 11 procure and
z -
,._
• •
-
•
•
0 -
or companies approved by the Director of Public Works of the
City of Englewood, and authorized to do business in the State
of Colorado; a certified copy or certified copies of all such
insurance policies shall be filed with the Director of Public
Works and each such policy shall contain a statement therein
or endorsement thereon that i will not be cancelled or ma -
terially changed or altered without at least fifteen (15)
days' prior written notice, by ce rtified mail to the said
Director of Public 'or s, and 1f such policy or policies
shall be for a pe 1fic term each such policy shall contain
a statement therein or endorsement thereon that written notice
of termination sh 11 be iven by registered mail to the said
Director of Public Works at 1 ast fifteen (15) days prior to
the termination of the term; all such insurance policies shall
be specifically endor ed to include all liability assumed by
the licensee or permitte h reunder and shall name the City
of Englewood, a Colorado municipal corporation, as beneficiary.
(g) The licensee shall remove and replace any and all cu rb and
gutter, sidewal and pavirg, hoth inside th areas of encroach-
ment and in the areas of the street adjoining thereto, that
becane broken, damaged or unsightly during the cours of con-
st ruction, without co t to th City of En le~ood. The licensee
h 11, in repairing any s ree cu s, r pl e s 1d cut. wi h a
mini.Jrum of six inches of basecour with thr inch s of s-
phaltlc concrete surfacing, said e cavation to r in free
from any settlement arising out of any su h '-'Or performed
within the limits of the tren h.
... _
..
•
-•
0 t•
•
to be present at a hearing to be conducted by the Council upon such matters
and thereat to present itsor their views and opinions thereon and to pre -
sent for consideration action or actions alternative to the revocation of
such license or pennit.
Section 4
That this license or pennit shall be of no force or effect until the
following things have been done and perfonned:
day
l 1
a) The licensee or penni ttee shall have filed with the Director of
Public Works a written acceptance of the terms and conditions
of this ordinance together with a fee adequate for filing with
the Clerk and Recorder in and for the County of Arapahoe, State
of Colorado; said acceptance shall be ut substantially the fol-
lowing fom:
Date: ___________ _
, the undersigned, do hereby accept all of the terms and con-
ditions recited in Ordinance No. __ , Series of -------
Signed by -~--y-,---:-.---.....,...----(Permittee or Licensee)
By ____ ~~~~~~~--------{ Name of Off1cer)
b) Th licen ee or pennitte shall have filed with the Director
o Public Wor 11 in urance policie and certificate her in
r ited; and
c) Th D1r or of
th fore o:m r
orks hall ha e c rtified in writm tha
t hav been perfo
Intr ed,
n:h, 19
d 1n full and p fir t read1n on tilt" 1 t
Bill or on da 0 r h
• 4 • • •
-
•
•
•
• I•
•
MAYOR
AITEST:
EX OFFICIO CiiY CLERK-TREASURER
I, William D. James , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
is a tru , accurate and complete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance, introduced,
read in full, and passed on first reading on the 1st day of March, 1976.
EX OFFICIO CITY CLERK-TREASURER
..
• •
,
•
•
0 -
MEMORANDUM TO TilE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGArtDING ACTION OR
RE COMMENDATION OF THE CI TY PLANNING AND ZONING COMM ISSION.
DATE : February 18, 1976
S BJECT: Amendment of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance
§22.5, Supplementary Regulations
§22. , Definitions
RECOM fE DATION.
William mov d:
Ed Smith second d: The Commission approve and recomm nd to City
Co uncil th iollo ing am ndm nts to the Compr h n iv Ordinance:
§22.8
..::...=.~=..-=:-.:... .=:..::.:;...:::..::::,=-=..::.....:;;. -A structur hich i built of uch
1.
2.
it would commonly b xpect d
or 1 b u ilt !or a purpo e that
r lati 1 hort, OR A Y
'T USE 0 C 'PA CY.
i b d on h lollo
th zon
b loca d,
th
'
•
-
•
•
0
•
AYES : Ed Smith, Tanguma, Wade, Williams, Jorgenson
NAYS: None
ABSENT : Don Smith, Jones, Parker, Pierson
The motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
By Order of the City Planning
and Zoning Commi sion.
•.
.....
'
• •
STAFF REPORT
Pag -1-
"Tem
STAFF REPORT RE:
S"
•
-
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
§22.8 Definitions
§22.5 Su
Am ndment to §22.5, Supplementary Regulations, of the
Compreh n ive Zoning Ordinance, and amendment to §22.8,
Definitions, of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance.
DATE TO HEARING:
lNITIAT D BY .
Th • C1 . Plann1ng and Zoning Commission.
A;., a r :>bout th time p r1od within
which stru tuJ cons.ukr d " emporary", th Planning
and Zon1ng Comm1 1on ha r qu t d that the d fin1t1on of
th t rm "t mporary tructure" b xpand d in th f1ni tions
and Suppl m ntar R gu lations of th Compr h n iv Zoning Ord1nan
ZO E DISTRICT:
Th am ndm nt to the Compr h n 1v Z nin Ord1n n
ould pply to t mporary tructu i all zon di tr ct
r
--
-
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -2-
"Tern Structures"
•
, .
•
In addition to the above, under §22.5 Supplementary
Regulations, th following regula tion should be adopted:
Structures, Temporary -use and t rm:
ALL TEMPORARY STRUCTURES SHALL CONFORM TO THE OCCUPANCY
OR USE FOR THE ZONED DISTRICT I WHICH IT IS TO BE LOCATED.
UCH TEMPORARY STRUCTURE SHALL NOT EX IST FOR A PERIOD OF lORE
THA SIX CO TI UOUS MONTHS U ESS OTHER WISE APPRO ED BY THE
COO E FORCEME T DIVISIO FOR A PERIOD OT TO EXCEED AN ADDITJO AL SIX 10 THS.
D OF PREVIOUS CITY ACTIO
To hi tim , tb Cod Enforc ment Official r viewing
an appl~cation for a permit for a temporary buildin ha reli d
on the d finition given in thr 'ngl ~ood Fire Cod This
allow for ach structure to be r vi w d on it o n meri and
a im limit cov rs only tho tructur s in Fir Zon o. 1
and 'o. 2: th c ntral bu ine area and the comm r ~ally
zoned ar long outh Broad ay, A regular buildin• permit
ued tor a t mporary stru tur Which conform to all
for a p rman nt tructure and a tim limit is
s t for th r moval of th tructur . Thi dat i agr d upon
build r and Chief Building Official, and it is h n r on th p rmit.
th Plannin and Zoning Co
ha propo d th chan
r cora nd d abo
LYSIS :
p r-
nt Offichl
in ttin
rt1cu1 r
on in
• •
-
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -3-
"Tem Structures"
•
0 , .
•
Temporary building permits are, therefore, limited to
structures in the Fire Zones mentioned, which include only the
central business area and the commercially zoned areas along
South Broadway . The definition, referring to "miscellaneous
structures", is perhaps too general to be adequate.
As an additional point of information, the 1970 Denver
Building Code has been amended to include the following definition:
"Building, Temporary: A temporary building that is
not intend d for p rmanent use, at one location. Temporary
shall mean us of said buildin for a period of time not to
exceed six (6) continuous months, unless otherwise approved by the Departm nt."
The abov definition ~o· s not specify that the structure
must be u d in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance, and the
staff is of th opinion that thi provision should be included.
•
• •
1-
(
•
•
-
MEMORANDUM TO THE ENGLEWOOD CITY COUNCIL REGARDING ACTION OR
RECOMME DATIO OF THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
DATE: F bruary 18, 1976
SUBJECT: Approval of R-2-C Zon District Designation
RECOMMENDATIO :
Wad mov d:
Smith William seconded: Th Planning Commi sion recomm nd
to City Council favorabl pa ag
oJ th am ndment of th Compr h n iv Zoning Map to d si nate the Jollowing ar a a R-2-C :
Beginning at a point on th c nt rlin of East Kenyon Avenu
at 1ts ~nt rs t on with th centerline of th Broadway -
Lincoln alle ; thence east along th centerline of Ea t
K nyon A nu to the centerline of the Sherman/Grant all y;
th n e outh along the c nterline of the Sherman/Grant all y
to its intersection with the c ~• terline of East Oxford Avenu
th nee w st along the c nt rline of East Oxford Avenu to th
cent rline ~f the Broadway Lincoln alley; thence north alon
aid c nt rlJ.n to the point o beginning.
Thi r comrn ndation i ba d on the followin reason :
1. Th ar a propos
3.
llia
Pi r n, n ith, on
1h ot d.
1 t d'
nrn n
•
,
•
ST H RE POR
Pag -1-
ST~FF REPORT RE :
•
•
lO E D S fRICT DESIGNATIO
Cas #7-7 6
Publ 1c llearinp. on th area previously zon•d R-2-A,
1 o-fruD1ly R s1denc Distr1cl , to R-2-C, ledium Dt•n il y
Re idence Di strict .
DATE TO BE CONSIDERED :
Februar 18 . 197'.
l.:._!_'!:J ATED BY :
Th Cit oi En ·l ood , Co lorado .
REL ATIO
Thi s r a
denc District.
th City Coun il
tr1ct ha b
r a ted sp ·
.r.on d. Th
Zon ing Map,
R-2-C .
R~A :
•
STAFF REPOR T
Pag -2-
•
-
ZONE DISTRICT DESIG 'ATION
Cas #7-76
2 . The proposed R-2 -C Di trict zoning would provide
a uitable tran iti n b tw n th Busin s District to th
w s t and th Singl ~family Di trict to the east.
3. The propos d R-2-C Di trict zoning would have a
stabilizing a n d protectiv ff t on th existing residential
m1 oJ ou and two-family units in this ar a. The propos d
zoni n lor t i area would xclude dwellings in excess of a
o-farr.ly u c , as well as to prot ct against encroachment of
, c o mrr r ial or industrial uses.
I CR IPTIO~ O F SUBJECT SITE OR AREA A D THE ADJACENT AREA:
u bJ ct area is an ight block area in siz , ituated
tor th part b twe n a single-family residential area on
he th Broadway busin ss strip on the west. North
of th subJ t area is Flood Junior High. South of the ar a
a l o n r L1ncoln St1eet is a continuation of single and two-family
1 t.: 1 d n c s under th R-2, I dium D nsi ty zoning . Th to
t h~ ~ou t h along South Sherman Str t, is primarily d d
1 t 1 nh l -fam1ly re id n
Th ubjcct area wa d
t h lat 1920's and 1940.
family u a ; howe r, om
s t~o-lamily dwelling with ba
t he r ar 144 ingl -family un1t
two -f a mily unit . Sea t r d
nnd lour-lamily units and on
a ll o f th i n g l
too t front tru tur
(1 75 ) ll'ith
TO Ttl R-2-C
'
•
STAFF REPORT
P ntOC' -3-
•
0
•
ZONE DISTRICT DESIGNATION
Case #7-76
r PS 1d nt of the a rea south of East Kenyon Avenue and north of
Ea t Oxford Av nu e on South Lincoln and South Sherman Str ets,
a 1ormer R-2-A Zon District, regarding multi-family dwelling s
a a p rmitt d u i n that area. Because of that concer , a
m, •ti ng was schedul don September 11, 1975, at which me eting
a p roximately seventy oi the residents of the subject area
at t nded. Four members of the Planning and Zoning Commission
an d members of th Planning staff were also in attendance.
A1t r c onsiderabl discussion at that meeting regarding the
t;.o po s i ble alt rnatives for futur zoning --R-1-C or R-2,
a large maj ority of thos pr e nt votC'd in favor of down-zoning
~ subj c t a rea from R-2-A, Two-family Residenc to R-1-C,
~ing l -fam i l y R sid n e. It a agr d that th City ould
po t th a r a for R-1-C z onin g as th y requ e sted .
A Pu b li H aring was h ld October 21 befor
P l a nning and Zoning Commission. The Commis ion sub equently
d ni d approval of th R-1-C, Singl -family R sid nc Distric
a a pro r Zon Di trict for t1 ar a. R ident appeale d
lhi r omm ndation to the Cit Counc il at their m ting of
'o o\~mi.H.'r 17, 1975. The City Council th n r !erre d th z oning
oi th i ar a back to th Planni Pg Commi si on for r apprai al.
c mb r 1, 1975, the City Co un il vot d to tabl con id ra-
on o f Bill o zon the pa re 1 in q ue tion to R-1-C until
1 h P lannin and Zoning Con11111s ion m t to consid r th creation
ot l dium Den ity Resid nc Di trict, which would be
trictiv than th R-2 Di tric t.
.. -
• •
•
STAFF REPORT
Page -4-
•
ZONE DISTRICT DES IGNATION
Cas e #7-76
restrictive to the development o f two-family units wh ich had
to have a minimum fronta gp of 75 feet . Unde r the prov isions
of the new R-2-C District , a two-family unit can be built on
a 50 foot frontage, with a maximum of two units under one
roof . The new R-2-C District inc orpor ates, as best as
possible, two situations to the satisfaction of the r e sidents
of the neighborhood . The R-2-C allows for the development of
two-family units, and at the same time limits new development
to a d e nsity and size that would be compatible with the
pr diminate l y single-famjly h aract r of this neighborhood.
The R-2-C District zoning will also allow for an
accept able transition from single-family uses to two-family uses.
•
;-
•.
'
• •
• . . -
I •
•
'
•
•
0 -
A BILL fOR
M ORDINAl CE REZO. L G A CERTAII\ PARCEL OF LAND WlTIH THE CITY OF
E 'GI..EI\'OOD, ARAPAHOe CCUNfY, STATE OF COLOIWXl, FR! 1 R 2-A, 1WO
FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT, to R-2 -C , t-IEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENCE
DISTRICT, AND At-lENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ACCORDINGLY .
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sect 'on 22.3 of th Comprehensive Zoning
Ordinance, a Public Hearing was held before the City Planning and
Zoning Commission on January 6, 1976, to rezone a certain parcel
of land Ithin th city fr001 R-2-A, Two Family Residence District
to R-2-C, ~dium Density Res1dence D1 tr1ct; and
1\HIRLAS, id Planning and ::on1n C 1Ss1on has considered
the propo · ed arnenJmen t and map chan and has subrn tted its f vor-
abl recOr.JIICndatlOn o h City Councll her for; and
1\HI:.Rf:.AS, pur uant to ction 2.:!.3 of th Comprehenstv Zomng
Ordinan e a 1b ic Hearing wa . h ld befor he City Council on
n t wn; and
to r :one a1d parL l cording to thl above de 1 -
h11LR1~, publ1c n essity, nv m n , he lth, tety, the
general " 1 t n.• and good zoning pra -tice JUS ify the propo~ed
amer dm nt to th~ ~aid 0 fiClal Zomng t-1ap, s h remafter e
orth.
• , 11U IU·R>RJ, AL J1 ORDAI rED BY lliF. CIJY C • Cl L OF THE CITY
OF l. 'G LI " )I), OL( RAOO, AS FOLLOI\ :
..
-
(
,
•
•
0 I• -
--..... "'" SERIES OF 1976
~.
The Offici•l Zo"i"g >~p of the City of EngleWood , Color'<fo , hereby
is ame nded.
day of March, 1976.
lnt""'""""· e•d in full •nd P'-''"' on fim "''ding on the '"
1976.
Publ;,hOd " • Bill for "" Ordinan e on the _ d•y of "'roh,
ATTEST:
1, IViUiillll D. J , do h r by Certify that t
i • tn. , «cur t nd c lote cop of • ill for
due d, r"" in full """p ed on fir t r t 19'6.
• .
• •
-
•
•
•
Section 2.
The Official Zoning ~~p of the City of Englewood, Colorado, hereby is amended.
Introduced , Ead in full and passed on first reading on the 1st day of March, 1976.
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the __ day of March, 1976.
MAYOR
AITEST:
EX OFFlClO CI1i' CLER.K-TRF.ASURER
I, Willlam D. James, do hereby certify that the hove and foregoing
is a true, accurate and comple te copy of a Bill for an Ord1nance, intro-
duced, read in full and pas ed on fir t reading on the __ d3y of rch, 1976 .
• •
t
•
..
RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1976
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE 1976 BUDGET IN THE GENERAL FUND.
WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted the 1976 annual budget; and
WHEREAS, the City Council had appropriated monies for contributions
to various service and civic organizations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and reviewed requests for
contributions and has voted to approve contributions in the amount of $1B,800;
and
WHEREAS, the total amount of contributions is $3,300 over the
budgeted amount.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
The following estimated revenues and appropriations are hereby
made in the General Fund.
Source of Funds
Fund Balance
Appropriations
City Council
Section 2.
($3,300)
S3,300
The City Manager and Director of Finance are hereby authorized to
make the above chang s to the 1976 budget of the City of Englewood.
ADOPTED AND APPROVED his 1st day of March, 1976.
AAVM
ATTEST :
I, Willia D. Ja s, ex of icfo City Cler -Tre surer of th City
o Engl od, Colorado, do h r by c rtify th th abov and for ofnq fs a
tru , accura and complet copy of Resolution o. ____ , S rfes of 1976. •
•
0 , •
•
A BILL FOR
AJIJ ORDINANCE AMENDING SECfiONS 8, 9(a) AND lO (a) OF CHAPTER 6, TIUE V,
OF TilE 1969 ENGLEWOOD MJNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO SALARIES FOR ALL CLAS-
SIFIED PERSONNEL OF TilE CITY OF ENGLE¥.00D .
BE IT ORDAINED BY TilE CITY COUNCIL OF TilE CITY OF ENGLEW<XXJ, COLORAOO,
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
That Section 8, Chapter 6 , Title V, of the '69 E.M .C. is hereby
amended to read as follows:
5-6-8: SAlARY AND WAGE SCHEDULE
The following table is ad o1 n ' for use in detennining salaries
for classified employees:
GRADE 1
GRADE 2
GRADE 3
GRADE 4
GRADE 5
GRADE 6
GRADE 7
G~DE 8
GRADE 9
GRADE 10
GRADE 11
GRADE 12
AD 13
A
$ 631
664
695
730
768
807
933
1,002
1,079
1 ,161
1,2"9
1,342
1,(j2
B
$ 664
695
730
768
807
846
980
1,052
1,134
1,217
1,308
1,408
1,514
0 tlOI\
t o r i.l
c
$ 695
730
768
807
846
889
1,027
1,107
1,189
1,280
1,375
1,479
1,589
D E
$ 730 $ 768
768 807
807 846
846 889
889 933
933 980
1,079 1,134
1,161 1,217
1 ,?49 1,308
1,342 1,408
1,442 1,514
1,550 1,6
1,668 1,751
F
$ 807
846
889
933
980
1,027
1,189
1,280
1,375
1,479
1,589
1,711
1.83
r , Ti tl , o t '6
•
'
• •
'
-
d· ,.
•
•
0
•
5-6-9: SALARIES FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT CLASSIFICATIONS
(a) Classified positions of the Police Department are hereby
classified within the salary schedule set forth below:
Rank Salary
Police Officer Fourth Class ............... $
Police Officer Third Class ...............• 891
995
1,081
1,152
1,367
1,505
1 ,674
Police Officer Second Class .............. .
Police Officer First Class ............... .
rgeant ..•........... ·. · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
Lieutenant ...........•....................
Captain .................................. .
Section 3.
That sub ect1on (a) of Sectinn 10, Chapter 6, Title V of the 69
E. I. C. 1 h reb en Jed to n . ..iJ ..t!> Hlllows:
0
5-6-10: SALARIES RlR FIRE DEP IT CLASSIFICATI
(a) The classified positions of the uniformed members of the
Fir Department are hereby classifi~ within th alary
schedule et forth below:
Rank
l") d
1:!:01
ion s.
u 10 ull
····· ........... .
t forth hll 1976.
ir t r di
. .. .
lary
$ 859
978
1,059
1 ,145
1 .233
1,302
1.415
1,584
tiv
1
•.
• •
-
'
•
•
•
RESOLUTJO 'it). , "f;RI r.s OF 1976 0
A RLSOLlJrl OF JIIE CITY COlNClL OF TilE CITY OF ENGLD\ iD,
COLO , RELATI · TO TilE APPOI 1El'IT OF TCM BURNS TO 11-IE
IUJSI 'G ,\lJil-lORITY o
1\lfi oRFAS, by Rc lut10n 'o o 18,
the d tcnninut ion of h Englewood
S~ries of 1972 , it wa .
ty Cm.mcil that th re
function in he C1tv is a nc d for a llous1 Authonty
of Englewood, Colorado; am
, ~, 111ER.I:I·Oiu ,
l"o•ulc 1! oJ the City
, tolora o Re ·iscd St tutc~
the byor c; all appoin
ty, which thority shall
d
ll)"or and City
.-...J , th t 1om Bums
1n ,\uthority for
S b
~
(:/
(
• .
• •
,
-
•
•
0
•
-------------~----------------------------~~~~~~~--~
•
Published as a Bill for an Ordinance on the ~day of March,
1976.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
EX OFFIClo CITY CLERK-TRFASURER
I , William D. James, do hereby certify that the above and fo re -
going is a true, accurate and complete copy of a Bill for an Ordinance
introduced, read in full, and passed on first reading on the 1 day
of March, 1976. ---
EX OFFICIO CITY CLERK-TREASURER
-:s -
•.
• •
•
•
•
•
, .
•
RJ scurr 1 o. · J ... SERIES OF 1976.
\ Rf ~"il1 J.UT10l . 01 : TilE CITY COUNCIL OF TI-lE CITY OF ENGI.D\ D, 1• ~
COLOR! , RELATI TO TilE APPOINTMENT Of TCM BUR.~S TO 11iE
I KXIS I 'G AUTIIOR l n .
1\lll!U \..S b} Rc
th J tcrmtn~tion ot
lut .ion , o. 48, Series of 1972, it was
he Fnglewood .. t Cotmci 1 that there
Authority to fun t.ion in thl' City
nd I
1s an d [or a llousi
of Engle oJ, Colorado;
I l\\, lllffiH liU ,
(<ll m 'll o! the Clty
ts h~ rchy opp01nt&l to
It\ ·{5) year te
nr:-.1:
olorado Re\iscd Statutes
the iayor -;hall appoint
ty, whi h A thority shall
nd
on aid llousmg Authority
by th t.Iyor and CJ t ·
Engle~ooJ, C orado, that '!om Burn s
the Engl ~ooJ lousmg 1\uthority fot
,._
Sb
'
• •
•
•
0 -
TO: WILLIAM D. JA.'1LS , lHRl.CfO OF ~I CE
fRa-t: BERNARD V. BERARDI 1, CITY ATIOR!;EY
IIAH: FEBRUJ\.RY 20, 1976
SUBJECT: ST. LOU LS CA11-IOLIC CHURCH SPECIAL EVlJI.iS LICI~S
Mr. Johannlsson del1vered to me yesterd y d f1le with refer -
ence to th special events permit for the St. Patri-:.k' s Day Fes -
tl al at th St. Loui s Ca tholic church for thelT annual spaghet i
dmne1.
·1 he counCll acuon request com s on to me Wl th a onment
ind1catu1g that the tate Li quor Division states that public
h aring for the special event permit ar not requued Also,
the lo al llcensing authority 1113} 01pprove or dis ppro\e without
a formal hearing.
A s ction of the s~cial ev nt permit, being Articl ,
Tttle 1 2 of the 'o loraJo R vied Statutes 1973, t tion 107 ,
pro id , 1n part, · follows:
"A[plilations for s pe ial ev nt permit shall b mad
!.lth h appro nat local 1i ensm authority on forms
prO\lJ•d b th state ... "
·n t on 10,) o f rncl b pro\ iJ s s foll ~o. :
. l
sJ__
• •
9 TO WTLLIAM JAMES
fF.BRUAR) 20 , 1976
•
0
•
I•
(b) n1e organization is temporarily occupying premises
other than its regular premise during such special events
as civ1 celebrations or co unty fairs , and that members of
the general public will b served during such sp ial events.
(c) Other exis t i ng facili t ies are not available or are
inadequa t e or the needs of the organization."
At ction 10o of Article 48 (3), the sta t ute prov1de
"TI1 hearing and publi not1c coneming such pe1m1 t :;h 11
conform to the provisions of Article 47 of th1 ltlc."
Ther are, 1n fact , two appli<..able pronsions of 11 tl 4 7, 1n tlons
119 and 140. 12-47-119 , C.R.S. 19 73, as Amended, provid , in per inent part, as follow :
for th county authoritie. o ~Y
or
lt, vinou ,
'
• •
t
-
(•
•
MEMo TO I~ILLIAM JAMES
f.J.:BRUAHY 20, 1976
•
•
Bernard J. Cullen , appears to be notarized a of the 17th day of
February. Ache k in the amount of twenty-five dollars made pay -
able to the State of Colo rado, Revenue Department, was dated Febru-ary 18.)
2. No t less than ten days' notice of th time and the place
of the hearing on such application must be made either by posting
a sign in a consp i cuous place on the premises or publication of
no tice in a newspaper of general circulation must be made.
3. A hear1ng must be held by the city coun cil to conform
Wlth Section 12-48 -103. (It appears too late to schedule a hear-
ing on the tirs t regular meeting in 1-tarch becau e publication or
pos ing for the ten-d ay period cannot be accomplished at this
time. The heanng on e application could be had on March 15, 1976~ if the proper sting or publication occur .)
, ~'-(~ ~ ''---
BERr\AR.n \-. B • I
I r t J llllllli
•
'
• •
•
0 , •
•
·---------~-
•
APPL ICANT:
COUNCIL AC TION REQUES T
LIQUOR AND ).2 BEER OUT LETS
St . Louis Catholic Church
3310 South Sherman
TYPE OF ACTION REQUESTED:
Initial hearing to set public hearing for St. Patrick's Day
Festival on March 19, 1976 at Parish Center, 3300 South Lincol n.
POLICE AND FB I REPORTS:
PREVIOUS CI TY COUNCIL ACTIONS DUR ING PRIOR TWO YEARS,
EXCWDI NG ANNU AL RENEWAL:
St . Patrick 's Day and spaghetti dinners 1n the past .
CITY ATT RNEY'S REVIEW:
•.
• •
f
•
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
•
0
•
Andy McCown, City Manager
Karl No I lenberger, Assistant City Manager
February 23, 1976
, .
SUBJECT: Retreats
As per your request, I wi I I a~mpt to summarize the possible types of
Council retreats as we i I as other pertinent factors.
1. Location.
The locat ion of a retreat is as diverse as the imagination at lows.
Posslbil ltles Include:
a. City Hal I -alI day session or two can be held at City Hal I
in the Community Room , Councl I rhambers or Conference Room A.
b. local home -a local home of one of the City Councl lmen or
city administration can be used. This offers a I lttle more
Informality. Coffee and rolls, informal meals and other
Items prohibited In City Hal I practically or legally can be
served.
c. local hotel -a hotel or meeting room could be used. Some
informal tty and breadth of menu Items is offered.
d . Out-of -town -an out-of-town overnight Cor two) can be arranged.
This me hod is th one used by City Councils in the past both
lth spouses and without. The Council has stayed at a private
lode (Security lite In Dill ion-1971) nd at guest ranches
CP aceful Val ley Lodge, Sou h St. Vrain Canyon -1973 and Gr y-
s one uest Ranch , Evergreen-1974). 0 her sites not yet
u d Include Swiss Village In Estes Park w Jch has as parat
tlng room building and Aspen lodg in Es es Perk as well as
ny oth rs. T e Cl y Council has had Friday hrough Sunday
retree s end rid y through Saturday re r ats. T major
dv n are he Informality and ability to et way from
I I he o her dl rae ton which c e e or a councl I n's
entlon.
2. £.cill..
~.
Cl
I s he
on a n lnt
yston Gu
The cost
A tw nl
nc in 1974 cost th
uld probably be around
uld probably o or
ra no I It y qu stlons on h
Is anyw r
• •
-
•
page 2
Andy McCown
February 23, 1976
4. Agenda.
•
0 t•
•
Samples of pa st agendas are enclosed. The variety of ·agenda Is de-
pendent upon the Council's desires.
These are the major Items I can think of concerning retreats. If you
desire added Information, please advise.
' ~~~~ N lt.J, r"'
Karl Nollenberger
Assistant City Manager
KN/sb
Encl osure s
•.
• •
•
,
•
City of Englewood
Englewood, Colorado
Attn: Hr. Stanley Dial
•
0 ~~
•
Re: Englewood City Coyncil Meeting Feb. 22-23, 1974
vn one Ot'+-.l.l.t.o
Overnight accomodations for 11 persons i $33.00 -----$363.00
Meeting Room -------------------------------------·-40.00
Coffee breaks ------------·------·······----········· 1.00
Extra Heals
2 Steak Dinners i $7.50 --------------------------
2 LYncheon i$4.00 --------------------------------
7 Ha• Dinners t $4.50 ------··-·-····--·----------
15.00
8.00
31.50
10 s Grah1ty
Total
Less Deposit
Balance Due
THANK YOU
Sybtotal
$464.50
46.45
$510.95
$100.00
$410.95
• •
,
-
•
•
0 I • -
SUGGESTED AGENDA ITEMS
Council Retreat, July 23 -25 , 191 1
1. Traffic Plan recommendations of traffic consultant. (We will have copies of
an interim report reciting the "Immediate Recommendations.")
2. Discussion of Englewood'1!1 directions of future development. Where is Englewood
going? Should the City play a role in controlling, promoting or guiding the commu-
nity's future? Do we need a plan or guide for development of our expanding core?
How do we get such a guide?
3. Review of a tentative six year capital informants plan. This study document will
be distributed to all advisory boards and department heads shortly for their review.
Their subsequent comments will be considered In developing the final recommended
plan to be submitted to you In September.
4. Possible further review of the "Name the Parks Guidelines,"
5. Report regarding the review of the procedures and organization of the Finance
Department.
6. Discussion of possible Department of Community Development with a greater
emphasis on positive and direct activities and responslbtllttea In the areas of
redevelopment, downtown core area guidance, low Income housing environmental
code enforcement, etc.
7. Where does Englewood have a role to play In leadership and guidance of Its
neighbors and the general south metropolitan community? What about serving
our neighboring cities with municipal services by contract? What about
c01111ol1dattoos ?
· • our City support development of a regional services authority? What
sh,. d we seek to hav included as mandatory functions and optional functiona ?
9. Th one municipals rvice with th greatest escalation of manpower coats is the
fire service. How can we use innovation and imaglnattve techDiquea to tnmcate
th ae costs? And better the servic ?
10. To what extent and bow should d partm nt heads and staff provide assiatanc
and guidanc for th various Boards and CommtasiODII of th City Council?
11. Updated r port r ardlng n gottatlooa wi th mploy a' asa oci atlon.
STANLEY H. DIAL
City f r
HD/
•.
'
• •
-
c
•
•
•
--
•
•
SUGGESTED AGENDA
COUNCIL RETREAT
May 18-20, 1973
Followtng Is a llst of Items which you may wish to consider for discussion during the Retreat:
1. The number and schedule of Council meetings. (Are two regular
meetings enough? Should a regular study session be scheduled each
month? Some cities regularly preceed their regular formal meetings
with a regular Informal meeting. Are Monday nights still the best for meetings?)
2. Methods of Improving the quality and shortening the length of Council meetings.
3. Council's e""J)ectattons and performance of the City Manager. Council
might meet privately first and then with the Manager.
4. Memorandum dated May 7, 1973, fropt Kells Waggoner. (Copies enclo ed.)
5. The South Platte River area developments:
(a) Annexation of Santa Fe-Unlon area. (Also, fire protection to th ar a.)
(b) Golf course report. (Copies en losed.)
(c) Propo ed Publtc &..rvtce Compan land option. 1o ""'"" ,,,.. 'J,.,._ lhh j
(d ) Floyd Winslow land.
(e) Possible merg r with Sheridan. (Dllcuulons with mobile hom 1 parka owners. )
6. Cor Ar Plannlnc taba •
7. Rec t dtecuaalcm tth J ho Holl rr r ard hla land boldln e.
tu. of emplo ••
9. Po alb! Chart r r 1 one :
(a) Pr ure and tlmt
(b) UD let pal jud ppolntlv •
• •
1
(
•
-
SUGGESTED AGENDA
COUNCIL RETREAT
~ay 18 -20, 1973
Page 2.
•
0
•
9. Possible Charter revisions: (Continued)
, .
(c) Provisions to exempt key employees from the classified service.
(d) Age requirement for voting and/or holding office in municipal
government.
(e) Other.
(Enclosed you will find copies of the Charter.)
10. Sale of Boreas Pass water rights to Coors.
11. Status of Housing and Urban Renewal Authorities.
12. X-rated films. (See enclosed Court !lndlngs.)
13. Overall 1973-74 financial projec tions and discuaaion of community
needs and priorities. (See enclosed Projection .)
14. Suggested Phases In and fV Storm Drainage Prop-ama. (See enclosure.)
15. What about montes for prop-ams for :
(a) 1b aged.
(b) Elementary school aged children.
(o) Employment of high school and junior h h school studeots.
(d ) Mental h alth.
(e) Oth r.
Ul. Travel ns pollcl s.
17. Out-of-ata trav 1 poltc •
1 • Pollee-Fir C r lcatton.
11. or th lfOOd o th or
20. Ad Joununet •
'
• •
-
(
•
-
TENTATIVE AGENDA
COUNCIL RETREAT
February 22-23 , ,,,,._.
Following is a suggested agenda schedule which, perhaps, we can review first
thing when we meet Friday evening.
Friday, February 22
1. Larry Wylie of Environmental Planning & Research wlll discuss the city
center planning during dinner. (Dinner wlll be at 6:30 P.M.)
Saturday, February 23
1. Rich Lorig (Personnel Director) anrl Karl Nollenberger (Director of
Finance) will be present from 10:00 A.M. through lunch on Saturday to
discuss general relationships with th Board, upcoming negotlatlons with
employee groups, and any other pertinent matters relating to their areas
of competence.
2.
3.
5,
(Copies of a memorandum to the City Manag r dated January 31 on a
labor relations course, a memorandum to th City Manager from the
Per onnel Director dated December 5 on th 1974 negotlatloo philosophy,
a m morandum from th Director of tlllll s to th Director of Personnel
relative to a possible grl vane ln th w r Plaut, and a memorandum
to th City Manager from then team r latlve to 1974 n gotlatlons ar enclosed.)
Dl
rg r to ta ov r alter lunch ln
lmpllcatlona of our aanttar
• (W may hav Cbarl s
for thl slon. )
raid f r ld rl •
d
clo ed.)
..
•
1-
(
•
•
TENTATIVE AGENDA
COUNCIL RETREAT
February 22-23
Page 2.
•
• •
6. Discussioo of the relatlooship of the City government with the Englewood
Chamber of Commerce. (Copies of various memoranda enclosed.)
7. Review of SRI Community Response question priorities. (The proposed
questions for the community attitude survey wlll be brought to the Retreat
Friday afternoon by Andy McCown. )
8. Discuastoo of various personnel matters.
9. Discuasioo of agenda preparation, conduct of Council meetings, Council
expectations of staff, etc.
10. Review of the normal procedure for use of eminent domai::l .n acquiring land by the City.
11. Discussion of poulble addltlooal t nnls courts.
12. Dlscuaetoo of capital tmprovem nt proj eta, relative priorities for pro-
grams and capital needs, and dtscuaelon of the City's current and futur
policies of land acqulsltloo and cood mnatton steps.
Respectfully,
...ib .. < -t
STANLEY H. DIAL •r
City Ma.nag r
RHD:dO
,_
•
• •
•
,
1-
(
(
•
•
0 ,. -
TO: Andy McCown, City Manager
FROM: Karl Nol lenberger, Assistant City Manager and
Kel Is Waggoner, Director of Publ lc Works
DATE: February 20, 1976
SUBJECT: Zuni Street Construction
The plans for construction of Zuni Street from Yale to Dartmouth are
moving forward at this time. Denver Is In the process of purchasing
the necessary right-of-way on their side and relocating the Ind iv iduals
whose homes wl I I be removed. Denver also fe Is that they wll I have the
necessary construction funds aval I able very shortly.
As you know, this project Is being financed by the Aid to Urban
Systems program with 74% federal aid to the project. This eaves Engle-
wood and Denver sharing the remaining 26 % of the construction costs.
The type of fInancIng w I II a I so be trw• for the Dartmouth Street con-
struction from Zuni to Santa Fe.
If these streets were not under a federal program we would probably
Include them In a special assessment district where the property owner
Is assessed for the Improvements and the resultant benefits to his
property. While the net share borne by the City and the property
owner combined Is greatly reduced under the Aid to Urban Systems pro-
gram, the breakdown Is such that the property owner comes out paying
nothing and the City pays for alI of th local share out of general tax revenues.
As a result of this, we have pursued wl h the City Attorney th pos-
slbll lty of assessing a portion of the local share to the property
owners. His verbal opinion was that there was apparent justification
for an Improvement dlstrlc to be formed If so desired by th City
Councl I. The prop rty owners uld pay only 26% of the assess nt If
the federal monies are Involved, or s im ply , th property owner would
get credit for the fed ra l monies on an equal basis with th City for
the City's share of the I rov nts such as In tersections.
The Ct y Attorne needs o
Councl I Is desirous ot
gl d o dl cuss I
Sb
t h r th Cit
ould be
,_
lob
'
• •
•
•
-
At the request of people living in the northwest Englewood
area, as evidenced by the petitions carrying some 79 signatures
which ·have been filed with the City on this date, I would like
to make the following motion:
I move that the City Council initiate the rez oning of the
following described area from R-1-C, Single-family Residence,
to R-2-C, Medium Density Residence, pursuant to §22.3-1 and
122.3-2 of the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance, and ask the
Planning Commission to determine whether the public necessity,
convenience, health, safety, morals, general welfare and good
zoning practice justifies that area be rezoned R-2-C, Mediua
Density Residential, and to submit its recommendation thereon
to the City Council in due course:
The subject area being bounded by the Evans/Adriatic alley
and alley extended on the north, the centerline of South
Tejon Street on the east; the centerline of Block 13, South-
lawn Gardens Subdivision on the south; and the centerline of
South Zuni Street on the west.
• •
•
§ 22 • 3 A'IE NDME NTS
• ,_
0 I• -
h. Appeals from the board. Any person or per-
sons jointJ y or severally aggrieved by any
decision of lhe Board, or any resident,
taxpa yet·, or any officer, department, Board
or Commission of the municipality may appeal
such decision by appropriate legal action to
a Court of Record having jurisdiction thereof.
§22.3-1 Requirement for chang£_.
Whenever the public necessity, convenience, health, saf~ty, morals, general welfare, or good zoning practice
justifies such action, and ~er having been submitted for
consideration by the Commission, the-c~~~i~ change
the zone or the regulations estab~shed by this Ordinance 1ft r __ Put:?l ~u!_ear~ l!S has--p en_ b.<' .lyon thf _p1r.lo_~~~~ change.
§2 2.3-2 initiation of chang!.
A proposed chang~ of zone may be submitted by the City
Coyncil, the Commission, or the Board without fee, or by an
appli<'ation with prope r fees by one or more of the owners of
property within the area proposed to be changed . Any proposed
amendment or change , initiated otherwise than by the City
Planning and Zonin Commission. shall be submitted to said
Commission for its examination and recommendation befor con-
sideration by the City Council.
122.3-3 A:'IICndment fe s of Plannil}g and Zoning Co mmi ssion.
shall
b th
aid
such
§22 .3-4
th Commission for zoning amendments
for amendment a 8\.un d termined
proc ling
v nt 1hall
•
0 I ~
•
----------------~
I
•
ROUGH IJRAF1V
~'--
Reverend Herbert R. Hosanna, Presid nt
and Members of the Board of Education
Dear Reverend Hosanna:
Over the last several weeks the Ellglel«Xld City Council has had the opportunity
to ·review the recCJlllendation to close the Scenic View Elementary School and the
benefits/problems created therein. Altrough we fully realize that the responsi-
bility for this decision lies with the Scrool Board, we also f eel hat as a City
Cooncil we have a responsibility to effectively camunicate with o ther elected
officials our feel~ on this matter and others of such rrutual concern.
The Council has net with parents fran the Scenic View area and the Planning and
~ Catrnission to discuss this problem. It is our feel ha fran city
gov rment stanipoint that there are other factors o consider in tl clos~
of the Scenic Vi w Scrool other than the effects he ucational sys
I t is our opinion that the clos~ of this scrool , or any ot r ne
scrool , versely affect property val s in that particular Ind
the clos~ of the Scenic View Scrool caul po sibly an tl his
resid 1al Ofc
t to
In
y. or •
•.
•
,
•
•
•
0 , .
•
-~----~--------~---------=~--~~-~-
Page 2
1. Request for rezoning fran the current R-1-C (Residential Zonillg)
n1ul ..... ~
to R-2-C ~Densit y Multi-Family Zoning).
2 . Dedic ation of land for e xtensions of add itional streets thereby
opening up development .
3. Active neighbortxxxi participation in school affairs and working
with the Scmol Board in efforts t o 1~~ the student populat ion
in the Scenic View area.
Therefore, we as the City Council feel that in light of these and o r
reasons that it might be beneficial to Englewood as a whole and to l e
Scenic View area in particular to keep the scmol open for an addi i onal
year in order to have proper time for evaluation of· the results of ctions
closing , do want to state that we know that whatev r ecision Board
makes will be 1n the bes interest of the camunity and he hool sy s em
you serv . Englewood always enjoy the reputation of rnin a .J..nins:; high
stancla:rds in educational d v lopnent ' am know that his will c ontlnu
under your capable am dedica ed 1 ership .
.31rlc re 1y'
J L . TA~. r
cc : Amy Me r
'
• •
•
I• -
Board of Adjustment and Appeals appointments 3/1 /76
W. Kelley Ollver, 3134 South Vtne, Englewood Business phone 399-974
John Kretling same
Water & Sewer appointments 3/1/76
David Hayes same
Thomas~ Glbaon, 4801 South IDea business 794-2611 X 34 r esidence 7 1-3343
P18DIIini & ZOilJ.Di appointments 3/1 /76
George Jorgen80n, same
Library a ppointments 3/1 /76
Su Mu ll e r (Mre. A. Gilbert) 2941 South Franklin 7 9-o95
Glenna B DDett. 3260 South Clarkaoo bu s ln a 7 51 100; res ldellc 7 1-51 3
Eerl uPr , sam
El tlon appolntm nt 3/1/76
Berb ra Bu (Mrl. Wayn L.), 410 uth • 7 -ots •
R tl lntm nt 3/1 /'1
VI rl , 4717
Rl rna -3 5
•
]-
• , .
•
ROLL CALL
A Moved Seconded ~e !y sta n sent Wf]lfams L_ so vern v
Na Ab Ab
_:,ml_tn _!""'
J'ann v
_Brown ~I-' t:layton _!"' k-~or _!~or V"
• •
,
•
] •.
• -
ROLL CALL
M ed S ded A Na Ab taf Ab t
ov econ ~e !.l. s n sen WfJ..!.!ams ~ .L_ ~ovem ~ 2!!!ill ..Jt::::.. L __!"4nn ~ _!rown ..t::...:: ~~on --1::::::: __l'!~or _r ~or ~
•
• •
,
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
M ed S nded A Na Ab taf ov eco ~e ~ s n sen Wf]Jfams _k"'_
~overn ~ ~ ~ ~ Jlllann y
~ ~rown "./
Ab t
~~on ,.
1::::. .JIIIayor Taylor _k" ..
• •
•
,
• -• , .
•
ROLL CALL
_ .. Moved Seconded Abstain Absent
,
'
'
•.
•
I
' I
•
•
frl
(}
, ,
Moved
.. /' I
•
0
•
ROLL CALL
t•
Abstain Absent
• •
,
• -•
• •
1
J
) ~ (' J ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Abstain Absent
'
• •
•
,
• -•.
0
•
ROLL CALL
M ed S nded ov eco
Wf 1 tfams
A I.Ye Na I_Y Ab taf s n Ab t sen
_sovem
~_l_~n
~nn
_IS_rown
_I..IBy~On
__!!_q_or _!_~or
I ,I' I
;
-{. //
l
• •
• -•
• t•
•
--
lV
I I ) >(, I ROLL CALL
"' ed s ded A Na Ab Ab ov econ ~eL ay sta n sent Williams ~ :..---~overn y
~tn v
lllann 1/
!/ urown v
~ayton v
Mayor Taylor ~
• •
t •
•
1-•.
• I•
•
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Me Na....l._ Abstain Absent 'f.!ll1ams _L 2_overn ~
2!!!.!!.!! ~ _llann .:::::::_
~rown .....-/
~~on -~ .::::. _11ayor .!l!l.!. or ~ '
•
• •
•
• • t -•.
• «•
•
l
.... ~;ved :,
Na_y_-~tafn Seconded _Me Absent Wfllfams ~ t-~overn -""' ~ ~~ ~
..L ~nn y ........-~.;: _!l_rown v I ~Ja_n_on ~ Mayor Tay_! or v
•
• •
•
I
• . ' -•
•
1----
I I. 1
ROLL CALL
M ed S ded A Ab taf Ab t
ov econ ~e I_Y s n sen lli!.!.fams
2_overn '" -~_lgl __!
~nn .::::::::._
_!S_r<M'I ' _l..la..l_ton ~ _!!_~or _!~or ~
'
• •
0
,
•
-
•
/
J
"' ed s ded ov econ
Wfl_liams
So vern
~lth
,..nn
Brown
;rayton
,.ayor Tl.)'lor
•
•
• t•
•
A 'Ye Na IY _.., Ab taf s n Ab t sen
V'
,._?
_y _..
.I/ ......
• •
,
• -• . , .
•
ROLL CALL
ov econ ~e ~ s n sen Wfl_! fams V'
M ed S ded A Na Ab taf Ab t
----2._overn ~ ~ L -~"" £_
_!rown ~ v
~l!l!_on ...!::::... _lll~r ~TayJor ~
• •
•
•
,
• -•.
0 , •
•
..
,_
.I
ROLL CALL
M ed S ded A ov econ ~e I}' s n sen Williams J.
Na Ab taf Ab t
r-sovern 1/ ~ :»m1tn L· ~ann c.-
_l!rown ' ~ Clayton ~ ~or _I~or ,.,.... ..
• •
•
•
• -
0 t•
•
--
ROLL CALL
Moved Se~onded
Abstain Absent
• •
•
,
• -
• L•
'·
p
ROLL CALL
I (
s Ab Moved econded A.Ye Nay Abstain sent W1111ams v
Sovern 1/"V
I~ ~1_th v
Mann v
_!J'OWI y
1 _~;Jayton v
Mayor Taylor /./"" ..
--... ·~
-· ... f;
•
t •
-
--
Mo eel s v econ ded -
•
•
•
• t•
•
ROLL CALL
Wffifalls
~overn
~
~nn
_!_nMI
~~on
~ .!':l..!_or
I •
A ~e Na ~ Ab
~
...!=._
...l:::::::_
..!:::::::.._
~
sta n Ab t sen
..
• •
• • l -
0 I•
•
1--
I ROLL CALL
I
Moved Seconded ~e Na_y_ Abstain Absent W1]11ms y
~ ~vern ..-"'
/
~ ~ ... "" -~rot«~ t-'
~llYl:On ~ ,..yor Taylor _t-" ..
• •
•
• -• •
ROLL CALL
, ,
"' ed s ded A Na Ab ta1 Ab t ov econ '.l_e I_Y_ s n sen W1J_I1ams
~overn .
__!'~ :lll'l_!!_ll .
Mann ....
Brown ....
'
~~~on ,_
~ Mayor 1 l..l!_ or ~r-
• •
' •
• -•.
0 , •
•
ROLL CALL
"' ed s ded A Na Ab tai Ab t OV econ ~e IY s n sen
Williams ~
~ So vern -, ____
:!lllltn -~
l'lann v ,..,
Brown /...-"""' LL
1. rayton v 1/ .. l'layor ..!_l_.l!Or ,...,.
• •
,
•
Moved Seconded
I
---
. )
•
•
• •
ROLL CALL
f
JL) • I
~~,~,
A 'Ye Wf 11 fa111s ,.
So vern v :.man ~
__P'Iann v
_Bro.n ..,.
Clayton ~ ~or TAY_!_Or _.,.
Nay
v
~
Abstain A bsent
'
• •
,
• -
0 , .
•
ROLL CALL
s A A Moved econded '.)'e Na_...r_ bsta1n bsent W1111ams ~ A
_so vern ~ ~ ~_!_t!l_ ~ --Mann --_!_r'OWI -_{;_l_ay_!on -Mayor Taylor -
r /; ('
J
I
• •
• ,_
-
0 I•
•
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Abstain Absent
• •
I •
-
M ed S ov
•
•
I I
econ
,.
ded
.~
•
0 I •
•
ROLL CALL
r
~~
/
l //
Wf_l]_iams
Sovern
~ltn
_""!_nn
l!rown
Clayton
_1114}'or _T4,l!Or
A ~ye Na lY Ab tai s
~
~ _.
~
_/,/' 1--
.!""". v
~
n Ab t sen
• •
I
• ,_
]-•.
0 L•
•
ROLL CALL
Abstain Absent
'
• •
•
t
•
0
·. •
ROLL CALL
"' ,,
Moved Seconded Aye Nay Abstain Absent
Wfllfams -Sovern 1/"
~ ---:~m1tn 1/"
Ill ann ~
Brown ~ ,__....~ ~layton ~
_l!ayor Taylor ~
•
• •
• -•.
0 I•
·, •
.-
ROLL CALL
/
A f
Moved Seconded A~e Nay Abstafn bsent Wfllfams .--
So vern . .----... :.11th _......
.....--~nn --_!rown ~ Clayton ~
Nyor Taylor ~
..
//~ /
• •
•
• -•,
• t•
•
ROLL CALL
,
ed s nded A Na Ab Ab ov eco 'Ye ,-IY sta n sent Williams -So vern -(.. Sllllth ?/ Pllann "" f'
Brown " v ....-t;layton ~ ..-Pllayar Taylor ~
(
•
• • •
,
• -
0 t•
•
]
.. ( ROLL CALL
(
!/·
I .
A Ab Ab Moved eco ed ~e ~ sta n sent ~ Williams ·" ~ _sovern ~
~..!!!I_ ~ l!.ann ,._..-
_!rown ...:::::::_
~l..l!_on __.
~r taylor .......--
• •
0
I •
• -•.
• C•
•
ROLL CALL
) Moved Seconded _}.y_e .-Na_y Abstain Absent Wfll iams v
Sovern ~
;)1111 t'1 ,... !,..-
~nn Y"'
~rown ,...,-
II<-\.layton ~-
_!!_ayor Taylor ~ '
• •
•
•
' ' -
0 , •
•
-
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded Aye Nav Abstain Absent
Williams ....
Sovern ......--
(/ Slllfth . v
Mann v
.... Brown .....
....... Clayton v
Mayor Taylor I/ '
•
• •
•
,
-
Mov ed s econ ded
...--.__..
•
0
•
ROLL CALL
A ~Ye Nav
Wf 11 fams _-1:?'". _..
~overn y"
Ji1111tn v
Mann v
Brown v
~Jayton v
Mayor Taylor y
b A sta n Absent
' '
•.
• •
• . ' -•
0
•
ROLL CALL
'
• •
•
•
]-
•
ROLL CALL
Moved Seconded An ~y Abstain Absent
Williams ,.... __,.-----~overn ~ ,.....
........... :11111tn Y"" v
Mann ....
/
BMMI ~
~:;Jayton v-
Mayor 'Taylor ~
• •
•
• -
• t•
•
ved Seconded A~e Nav Abstain Absent Williams v -So vern .~
---:Jm'l th .k-
~nn ~
~f'(MI ,..,..-
t::layton .,/' r--
l'layor Taylor /
• •
•
•
• • l -
0 , •
·, •
ROLL CALL
" ed s nded A Na Ab ta1 Ab t OY eco ~e lY s n sen lillJ..! IllS .J::::.. so vern _ ....... .,_., _:1111_1:n _!::'_
~nn ...-.......-__IS_f'Otllrl ...... L
1.ray1:on
~r _l_IYIOr 1/
/
• •
•
•.
0 , .
•
r
'I ,I 'I ROLL CALL J I ,, .... J..
J
,,f. I)
I "' •' • I f.-~ t'va
Moved Seconded ~ -Hey Abstain Absent
W1111ams
Sovern
:,ntltn
Jllann
Brown
1..1ayton ' ,., Nyor Taylor
• •
,
•
• -•.
0 I•
•
•
ROLL CALL
s ded A ov econ "l'_e I!Y s n sen Wf_llfams _v
£_ j_overn ..!"':_ ..!""" ~ L ...!!!_nn y f.--~ J!rown ..!:::::L. ~~on z_
_JIIIayor Taylor r
Na Ab ta1 Ab t
• •
,
•